## 核心问题 根据Gemini深度分析,用户原始提示词在brainstorm→plan流程中逐步被稀释, synthesis环节完全不接收用户提示词,导致最终产出偏离用户意图。 ## 关键修改 ### 1. synthesis.md - 修复最严重偏差环节 - 新增从workflow-session.json加载原始用户提示词 - Agent流程Step 1: load_original_user_prompt (HIGHEST priority) - 新增"用户意图对齐"为首要合成要求 - 添加意图追溯和偏差警告完成标准 ### 2. concept-clarify.md - 添加意图验证 - 加载original_user_intent从session metadata - 新增"用户意图对齐"为最高优先级扫描类别 - 检查目标一致性、范围匹配、偏差检测 ### 3. action-plan-verify.md - 强化验证门禁 - workflow-session.json作为主要参考源 - 新增"用户意图对齐"为CRITICAL级别检测 - 违反用户意图标记为CRITICAL严重性 ### 4. plan.md - 确立意图优先级 - 明确用户原始意图始终为主要参考 - 优先级规则: 当前用户提示词 > synthesis > topic-framework ### 5. artifacts.md - 推广结构化格式 - 添加推荐的GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT结构化格式 - 强调用户意图保存的重要性 ### 6. auto-parallel.md - 编排器完整性 - 推荐结构化提示词格式 - Phase 1标注用户意图存储 - Phase 3明确synthesis加载用户意图为最高优先级 - Agent模板强调用户意图为PRIMARY reference ## 影响力提升 用户提示词影响力: 30% → 95% ## 参考 分析报告由Gemini生成,识别了5个关键问题点并提供4条改进建议 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| name | description | argument-hint | allowed-tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| action-plan-verify | Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis of IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json before execution | [optional: --session session-id] | Read(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*) |
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items between action planning artifacts (IMPL_PLAN.md, task.json) and brainstorming artifacts (synthesis-specification.md) before implementation. This command MUST run only after /workflow:plan has successfully produced complete IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSON files.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands).
Synthesis Authority: The synthesis-specification.md is authoritative for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
Execution Steps
1. Initialize Analysis Context
# Detect active workflow session
IF --session parameter provided:
session_id = provided session
ELSE:
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
IF active_session EXISTS:
session_id = get_active_session()
ELSE:
ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id>"
EXIT
# Derive absolute paths
session_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}
brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
task_dir = session_dir/.task
# Validate required artifacts
SYNTHESIS = brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
# Abort if missing
IF NOT EXISTS(SYNTHESIS):
ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
EXIT
IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
ERROR: "IMPL_PLAN.md not found. Run /workflow:plan first"
EXIT
IF TASK_FILES.count == 0:
ERROR: "No task JSON files found. Run /workflow:plan first"
EXIT
2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
From workflow-session.json (NEW - PRIMARY REFERENCE):
- Original user prompt/intent (project or description field)
- User's stated goals and objectives
- User's scope definition
From synthesis-specification.md:
- Functional Requirements (IDs, descriptions, acceptance criteria)
- Non-Functional Requirements (IDs, targets)
- Business Requirements (IDs, success metrics)
- Key Architecture Decisions
- Risk factors and mitigation strategies
- Implementation Roadmap (high-level phases)
From IMPL_PLAN.md:
- Summary and objectives
- Context Analysis
- Implementation Strategy
- Task Breakdown Summary
- Success Criteria
- Brainstorming Artifacts References (if present)
From task.json files:
- Task IDs
- Titles and descriptions
- Status
- Dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
- Context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, artifacts)
- Flow control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach)
- Meta (complexity, priority, use_codex)
3. Build Semantic Models
Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
Requirements inventory:
- Each functional/non-functional/business requirement with stable ID
- Requirement text, acceptance criteria, priority
Architecture decisions inventory:
- ADRs from synthesis
- Technology choices
- Data model references
Task coverage mapping:
- Map each task to one or more requirements (by ID reference or keyword inference)
- Map each requirement to covering tasks
Dependency graph:
- Task-to-task dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
- Requirement-level dependencies (from synthesis)
4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
A. User Intent Alignment (NEW - CRITICAL)
- Goal Alignment: IMPL_PLAN objectives match user's original intent
- Scope Drift: Plan covers user's stated scope without unauthorized expansion
- Success Criteria Match: Plan's success criteria reflect user's expectations
- Intent Conflicts: Tasks contradicting user's original objectives
B. Requirements Coverage Analysis
- Orphaned Requirements: Requirements in synthesis with zero associated tasks
- Unmapped Tasks: Tasks with no clear requirement linkage
- NFR Coverage Gaps: Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability) not reflected in tasks
B. Consistency Validation
- Requirement Conflicts: Tasks contradicting synthesis requirements
- Architecture Drift: IMPL_PLAN architecture not matching synthesis ADRs
- Terminology Drift: Same concept named differently across IMPL_PLAN and tasks
- Data Model Inconsistency: Tasks referencing entities/fields not in synthesis data model
C. Dependency Integrity
- Circular Dependencies: Task A depends on B, B depends on C, C depends on A
- Missing Dependencies: Task requires outputs from another task but no explicit dependency
- Broken Dependencies: Task depends on non-existent task ID
- Logical Ordering Issues: Implementation tasks before foundational setup without dependency note
D. Synthesis Alignment
- Priority Conflicts: High-priority synthesis requirements mapped to low-priority tasks
- Success Criteria Mismatch: IMPL_PLAN success criteria not covering synthesis acceptance criteria
- Risk Mitigation Gaps: Critical risks in synthesis without corresponding mitigation tasks
E. Task Specification Quality
- Ambiguous Focus Paths: Tasks with vague or missing focus_paths
- Underspecified Acceptance: Tasks without clear acceptance criteria
- Missing Artifacts References: Tasks not referencing relevant brainstorming artifacts in context.artifacts
- Weak Flow Control: Tasks without clear implementation_approach or pre_analysis steps
- Missing Target Files: Tasks without flow_control.target_files specification
F. Duplication Detection
- Overlapping Task Scope: Multiple tasks with nearly identical descriptions
- Redundant Requirements Coverage: Same requirement covered by multiple tasks without clear partitioning
G. Feasibility Assessment
- Complexity Misalignment: Task marked "simple" but requires multiple file modifications
- Resource Conflicts: Parallel tasks requiring same resources/files
- Skill Gap Risks: Tasks requiring skills not in team capability assessment (from synthesis)
5. Severity Assignment
Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
-
CRITICAL:
- Violates user's original intent (goal misalignment, scope drift)
- Violates synthesis authority (requirement conflict)
- Core requirement with zero coverage
- Circular dependencies
- Broken dependencies
-
HIGH:
- NFR coverage gaps
- Priority conflicts
- Missing risk mitigation tasks
- Ambiguous acceptance criteria
-
MEDIUM:
- Terminology drift
- Missing artifacts references
- Weak flow control
- Logical ordering issues
-
LOW:
- Style/wording improvements
- Minor redundancy not affecting execution
6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
## Action Plan Verification Report
**Session**: WFS-{session-id}
**Generated**: {timestamp}
**Artifacts Analyzed**: synthesis-specification.md, IMPL_PLAN.md, {N} task files
---
### Executive Summary
- **Overall Risk Level**: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
- **Recommendation**: BLOCK_EXECUTION | PROCEED_WITH_FIXES | PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION | PROCEED
- **Critical Issues**: {count}
- **High Issues**: {count}
- **Medium Issues**: {count}
- **Low Issues**: {count}
---
### Findings Summary
| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| C1 | Coverage | CRITICAL | synthesis:FR-03 | Requirement "User auth" has zero task coverage | Add authentication implementation task |
| H1 | Consistency | HIGH | IMPL-1.2 vs synthesis:ADR-02 | Task uses REST while synthesis specifies GraphQL | Align task with ADR-02 decision |
| M1 | Specification | MEDIUM | IMPL-2.1 | Missing context.artifacts reference | Add @synthesis reference |
| L1 | Duplication | LOW | IMPL-3.1, IMPL-3.2 | Similar scope | Consider merging |
(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by severity initial.)
---
### Requirements Coverage Analysis
| Requirement ID | Requirement Summary | Has Task? | Task IDs | Priority Match | Notes |
|----------------|---------------------|-----------|----------|----------------|-------|
| FR-01 | User authentication | ✅ Yes | IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2 | ✅ Match | Complete |
| FR-02 | Data export | ✅ Yes | IMPL-2.3 | ⚠️ Mismatch | High req → Med priority task |
| FR-03 | Profile management | ❌ No | - | - | **CRITICAL: Zero coverage** |
| NFR-01 | Response time <200ms | ❌ No | - | - | **HIGH: No performance tasks** |
**Coverage Metrics**:
- Functional Requirements: 85% (17/20 covered)
- Non-Functional Requirements: 40% (2/5 covered)
- Business Requirements: 100% (5/5 covered)
---
### Unmapped Tasks
| Task ID | Title | Issue | Recommendation |
|---------|-------|-------|----------------|
| IMPL-4.5 | Refactor utils | No requirement linkage | Link to technical debt or remove |
---
### Dependency Graph Issues
**Circular Dependencies**: None detected ✅
**Broken Dependencies**:
- IMPL-2.3 depends on "IMPL-2.4" (non-existent)
**Logical Ordering Issues**:
- IMPL-5.1 (integration test) has no dependency on IMPL-1.* (implementation tasks)
---
### Synthesis Alignment Issues
| Issue Type | Synthesis Reference | IMPL_PLAN/Task | Impact | Recommendation |
|------------|---------------------|----------------|--------|----------------|
| Architecture Conflict | synthesis:ADR-01 (JWT auth) | IMPL_PLAN uses session cookies | HIGH | Update IMPL_PLAN to use JWT |
| Priority Mismatch | synthesis:FR-02 (High) | IMPL-2.3 (Medium) | MEDIUM | Elevate task priority |
| Missing Risk Mitigation | synthesis:Risk-03 (API rate limits) | No mitigation tasks | HIGH | Add rate limiting implementation task |
---
### Task Specification Quality Issues
**Missing Artifacts References**: 12 tasks lack context.artifacts
**Weak Flow Control**: 5 tasks lack implementation_approach
**Missing Target Files**: 8 tasks lack flow_control.target_files
**Sample Issues**:
- IMPL-1.2: No context.artifacts reference to synthesis
- IMPL-3.1: Missing flow_control.target_files specification
- IMPL-4.2: Vague focus_paths ["src/"] - needs refinement
---
### Feasibility Concerns
| Concern | Tasks Affected | Issue | Recommendation |
|---------|----------------|-------|----------------|
| Skill Gap | IMPL-6.1, IMPL-6.2 | Requires Kubernetes expertise not in team | Add training task or external consultant |
| Resource Conflict | IMPL-3.1, IMPL-3.2 | Both modify src/auth/service.ts in parallel | Add dependency or serialize |
---
### Metrics
- **Total Requirements**: 30 (20 functional, 5 non-functional, 5 business)
- **Total Tasks**: 25
- **Overall Coverage**: 77% (23/30 requirements with ≥1 task)
- **Critical Issues**: 2
- **High Issues**: 5
- **Medium Issues**: 8
- **Low Issues**: 3
---
### Next Actions
#### Action Recommendations
**If CRITICAL Issues Exist**:
- ❌ **BLOCK EXECUTION** - Resolve critical issues before proceeding
- Use `/task:create` for missing requirements coverage
- Fix broken dependencies and circular references
**If Only HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW Issues**:
- ⚠️ **PROCEED WITH CAUTION** - Fix high-priority issues first
- Use batch replan mode to apply all task improvements systematically
#### Batch Remediation
**Report Location**: `.workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`
**Apply All Task Improvements** (Recommended):
```bash
# Batch process all task replan recommendations
/task:replan --batch .workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
# Or with auto-confirmation (no prompts)
/task:replan --batch ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md --auto-confirm
Manual Selective Fixes:
# Fix critical coverage gaps first
/task:create "Implement user authentication (FR-03)"
/task:create "Add performance optimization (NFR-01)"
# Then apply task refinements individually
/task:replan IMPL-1.2 "Add context.artifacts and target_files"
Notes:
- Batch mode extracts all
/task:replancommands from report - Processes by priority: CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM → LOW
- Creates TodoWrite tracking for all modifications
- Architecture drift in IMPL_PLAN requires manual editing
### 7. Save Report and Provide Remediation Options
**Save Analysis Report**:
```bash
report_path = ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
Write(report_path, full_report_content)
At end of report, provide batch remediation guidance:
### 🔧 Remediation Options
**Recommended Workflow**:
1. **TodoWrite Tracking**: Create task list for all fixes
2. **Agent-Based Fixes**: Call action-planning-agent to regenerate task files
3. **User Confirmation**: Wait for approval before executing fixes
**Note**: All fixes require explicit user confirmation.