mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-11 02:33:51 +08:00
39a35c24b1
- Streamlined analysis templates (architecture, pattern, performance, quality, security) - Simplified development templates (component, debugging, feature, refactor, testing) - Optimized documentation templates (api, folder-navigation, module-readme, project-architecture, project-examples, project-readme) - Enhanced planning templates (concept-eval, migration, task-breakdown) - Improved verification templates (codex-technical, cross-validation, gemini-strategic) - Updated claude-module-unified memory template - Refined workflow-architecture documentation 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
29 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
29 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
Cross-validate strategic (Gemini) and technical (Codex) assessments.
|
|
|
|
## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
|
|
□ Identify both consensus and conflict between the two analyses
|
|
□ Synthesize a unified risk profile and recommendation set
|
|
□ Resolve conflicting suggestions with a balanced approach
|
|
□ Frame final decisions as clear choices for the user
|
|
|
|
## REQUIRED CROSS-VALIDATION ANALYSIS
|
|
1. **Consensus Identification**: Find where both analyses agree.
|
|
2. **Conflict Resolution**: Analyze and resolve discrepancies.
|
|
3. **Risk Level Synthesis**: Combine risk assessments into a single profile.
|
|
4. **Recommendation Integration**: Synthesize recommendations into a unified plan.
|
|
5. **Quality Assurance Framework**: Establish combined quality metrics.
|
|
|
|
## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
|
|
- **Cross-Validation Summary**: Overall grade, confidence score, and risk profile.
|
|
- **Synthesis Report**: Consensus areas, conflict areas, and integrated recommendations.
|
|
- **User Approval Framework**: A clear breakdown of changes for user approval.
|
|
- **Modification Categories**: Classify changes by type (e.g., Task Structure, Technical).
|
|
|
|
## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
|
|
□ Both consensus and conflict between analyses are identified and documented
|
|
□ Risks and recommendations are synthesized into a single, coherent plan
|
|
□ Conflicting points are resolved with balanced, well-reasoned proposals
|
|
□ Final output is structured to facilitate clear user decisions
|
|
|
|
Focus: A balanced integration of strategic and technical perspectives to produce a single, actionable plan.
|