Claude-Code-Workflow/.codex/prompts/collaborative-plan-parallel.md

description, argument-hint

description	argument-hint
Parallel collaborative planning with Execution Groups - Multi-codex parallel task generation, execution group assignment, multi-branch strategy. Codex-optimized.	TASK="<description>" [--max-groups=3] [--group-strategy=automatic|balanced|manual] [--focus=<domain>]

Codex Collaborative-Plan-Parallel Workflow

Quick Start

Parallel collaborative planning workflow using Execution Groups architecture. Splits task into sub-domains, assigns them to execution groups, and prepares for multi-branch parallel development.

Core workflow: Understand → Group Assignment → Sequential Planning → Conflict Detection → Execution Strategy

Key features:

• Execution Groups: Sub-domains grouped for parallel execution by different codex instances
• Multi-branch strategy: Each execution group works on independent Git branch
• Codex instance assignment: Each group assigned to specific codex worker
• Dependency-aware grouping: Automatic or manual group assignment based on dependencies
• plan-note.md: Shared document with execution group sections

Note: Planning is still serial (Codex limitation), but output is structured for parallel execution.

Overview

This workflow enables structured planning for parallel execution:

1. Understanding & Group Assignment - Analyze requirements, identify sub-domains, assign to execution groups
2. Sequential Planning - Process each sub-domain serially via CLI analysis (planning phase only)
3. Conflict Detection - Scan for conflicts across execution groups
4. Execution Strategy - Generate branch strategy and codex assignment for parallel execution

The key innovation is Execution Groups - sub-domains are grouped by dependencies and complexity, enabling true parallel development with multiple codex instances.

Output Structure

.workflow/.planning/CPLAN-{slug}-{date}/
├── plan-note.md                      # ⭐ Core: Requirements + Groups + Tasks
├── requirement-analysis.json         # Phase 1: Sub-domain + group assignments
├── execution-groups.json             # ⭐ Phase 1: Group metadata + codex assignment
├── agents/                           # Phase 2: Per-domain plans (serial planning)
│   ├── {domain-1}/
│   │   └── plan.json
│   ├── {domain-2}/
│   │   └── plan.json
│   └── ...
├── conflicts.json                    # Phase 3: Conflict report
├── execution-strategy.md             # ⭐ Phase 4: Branch strategy + codex commands
└── plan.md                           # Phase 4: Human-readable summary

Output Artifacts

Phase 1: Understanding & Group Assignment

Artifact	Purpose
plan-note.md	Collaborative template with execution group sections
requirement-analysis.json	Sub-domain assignments with group IDs
execution-groups.json	⭐ Group metadata, codex assignment, branch names, dependencies

Phase 2: Sequential Planning (per Phase 1 in original)

Artifact	Purpose
agents/{domain}/plan.json	Detailed implementation plan per domain
Updated plan-note.md	Task pool and evidence sections filled per domain

Phase 3: Conflict Detection (same as original)

Artifact	Purpose
conflicts.json	Detected conflicts with types, severity, resolutions
Updated plan-note.md	Conflict markers section populated

Phase 4: Execution Strategy Generation

Artifact	Purpose
execution-strategy.md	⭐ Branch creation commands, codex execution commands per group, merge strategy
plan.md	Human-readable summary with execution groups

---

Implementation Details

Session Initialization

The workflow automatically generates a unique session identifier and directory structure.

Session ID Format: CPLAN-{slug}-{date}

• slug: Lowercase alphanumeric, max 30 chars
• date: YYYY-MM-DD format (UTC+8)

Session Directory: .workflow/.planning/{sessionId}/

Auto-Detection: If session folder exists with plan-note.md, automatically enters continue mode.

Session Variables:

• sessionId: Unique session identifier
• sessionFolder: Base directory for all artifacts
• maxGroups: Maximum execution groups (default: 3)
• groupStrategy: automatic | balanced | manual (default: automatic)

---

Phase 1: Understanding & Group Assignment

Objective: Analyze task requirements, identify sub-domains, assign to execution groups, and create the plan-note.md template.

Step 1.1: Analyze Task Description

Use built-in tools to understand the task scope and identify sub-domains.

Analysis Activities:

1. Extract task keywords - Identify key terms and concepts
2. Identify sub-domains - Split into 2-8 parallelizable focus areas
3. Analyze dependencies - Map cross-domain dependencies
4. Assess complexity - Evaluate task complexity per domain (Low/Medium/High)
5. Search for references - Find related documentation, README, architecture guides

Sub-Domain Identification Patterns:

Pattern	Keywords	Typical Group Assignment
Backend API	服务, 后端, API, 接口	Group with database if dependent
Frontend	界面, 前端, UI, 视图	Separate group (UI-focused)
Database	数据, 存储, 数据库, 持久化	Group with backend if tightly coupled
Testing	测试, 验证, QA	Can be separate or split across groups
Infrastructure	部署, 基础, 运维, 配置	Usually separate group

Step 1.2: Assign Execution Groups

Assign sub-domains to execution groups based on strategy.

Group Assignment Strategies:

1. Automatic Strategy (default)

• Logic: Group domains by dependency relationships
• Rule: Domains with direct dependencies → same group
• Rule: Independent domains → separate groups (up to maxGroups)
• Example:
  • Group 1: backend-api + database (dependent)
  • Group 2: frontend + ui-components (dependent)
  • Group 3: testing + documentation (independent)

2. Balanced Strategy

• Logic: Distribute domains evenly across groups by estimated effort
• Rule: Balance total complexity across groups
• Example:
  • Group 1: frontend (high) + testing (low)
  • Group 2: backend (high) + documentation (low)
  • Group 3: database (medium) + infrastructure (medium)

3. Manual Strategy

• Logic: Prompt user to manually assign domains to groups
• UI: Present domains with dependencies, ask for group assignments
• Validation: Check that dependencies are within same group or properly ordered

Codex Instance Assignment:

• Each group assigned to codex-{N} (e.g., codex-1, codex-2, codex-3)
• Instance names are logical identifiers for parallel execution
• Actual parallel execution happens in unified-execute-parallel workflow

Step 1.3: Generate execution-groups.json

Create the execution group metadata document.

execution-groups.json Structure:

{
  "session_id": "CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03",
  "total_groups": 3,
  "group_strategy": "automatic",
  "groups": [
    {
      "group_id": "EG-001",
      "codex_instance": "codex-1",
      "domains": ["frontend", "ui-components"],
      "branch_name": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend",
      "estimated_effort": "high",
      "task_id_range": "TASK-001~200",
      "dependencies_on_groups": [],
      "cross_group_files": []
    },
    {
      "group_id": "EG-002",
      "codex_instance": "codex-2",
      "domains": ["backend-api", "database"],
      "branch_name": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend",
      "estimated_effort": "medium",
      "task_id_range": "TASK-201~400",
      "dependencies_on_groups": [],
      "cross_group_files": []
    },
    {
      "group_id": "EG-003",
      "codex_instance": "codex-3",
      "domains": ["testing"],
      "branch_name": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing",
      "estimated_effort": "low",
      "task_id_range": "TASK-401~500",
      "dependencies_on_groups": ["EG-001", "EG-002"],
      "cross_group_files": []
    }
  ],
  "inter_group_dependencies": [
    {
      "from_group": "EG-003",
      "to_group": "EG-001",
      "dependency_type": "requires_completion",
      "description": "Testing requires frontend implementation"
    },
    {
      "from_group": "EG-003",
      "to_group": "EG-002",
      "dependency_type": "requires_completion",
      "description": "Testing requires backend API"
    }
  ]
}

Field Descriptions:

Field	Purpose
group_id	Unique execution group identifier (EG-001, EG-002, ...)
codex_instance	Logical codex worker name for parallel execution
domains[]	Sub-domains assigned to this group
branch_name	Git branch name for this group's work
estimated_effort	Complexity: low/medium/high
task_id_range	Non-overlapping TASK ID range (200 IDs per group)
dependencies_on_groups[]	Groups that must complete before this group starts
cross_group_files[]	Files modified by multiple groups (conflict risk)
inter_group_dependencies[]	Explicit cross-group dependency relationships

Step 1.4: Create plan-note.md Template with Groups

Generate structured template with execution group sections.

plan-note.md Structure:

• YAML Frontmatter: session_id, original_requirement, total_groups, group_strategy, status
• Section: 需求理解: Core objectives, key points, constraints, group strategy
• Section: 执行组划分: Table of groups with domains, branches, codex assignments
• Section: 任务池 - {Group ID} - {Domains}: Pre-allocated task section per execution group
• Section: 依赖关系: Cross-group dependencies
• Section: 冲突标记: Populated in Phase 3
• Section: 上下文证据 - {Group ID}: Evidence section per execution group

TASK ID Range Allocation: Each group receives 200 non-overlapping IDs (e.g., Group 1: TASK-001200, Group 2: TASK-201400).

Step 1.5: Update requirement-analysis.json with Groups

Extend requirement-analysis.json to include execution group assignments.

requirement-analysis.json Structure (extended):

{
  "session_id": "CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03",
  "original_requirement": "...",
  "complexity": "high",
  "total_groups": 3,
  "group_strategy": "automatic",
  "sub_domains": [
    {
      "focus_area": "frontend",
      "description": "...",
      "execution_group": "EG-001",
      "task_id_range": "TASK-001~100",
      "estimated_effort": "high",
      "dependencies": []
    },
    {
      "focus_area": "ui-components",
      "description": "...",
      "execution_group": "EG-001",
      "task_id_range": "TASK-101~200",
      "estimated_effort": "medium",
      "dependencies": ["frontend"]
    }
  ],
  "execution_groups_summary": [
    {
      "group_id": "EG-001",
      "domains": ["frontend", "ui-components"],
      "total_estimated_effort": "high"
    }
  ]
}

Success Criteria:

• 2-3 execution groups identified (up to maxGroups)
• Each group has 1-4 sub-domains
• Dependencies mapped (intra-group and inter-group)
• execution-groups.json created with complete metadata
• plan-note.md template includes group sections
• requirement-analysis.json extended with group assignments
• Branch names generated for each group
• Codex instance assigned to each group

---

Phase 2: Sequential Sub-Domain Planning

Objective: Process each sub-domain serially via CLI analysis (same as original workflow, but with group awareness).

Note: This phase is identical to original collaborative-plan-with-file Phase 2, with the following additions:

• CLI prompt includes execution group context
• Task IDs respect group's assigned range
• Cross-group dependencies explicitly documented

Step 2.1: Domain Planning Loop (Serial)

For each sub-domain in sequence:

1. Execute Gemini/Codex CLI analysis for the current domain
2. Include execution group metadata in CLI context
3. Parse CLI output into structured plan
4. Save detailed plan as agents/{domain}/plan.json
5. Update plan-note.md group section with task summaries and evidence

Planning Guideline: Wait for each domain's CLI analysis to complete before proceeding.

Step 2.2: CLI Planning with Group Context

Execute synchronous CLI analysis with execution group awareness.

CLI Analysis Scope (extended):

• PURPOSE: Generate detailed implementation plan for domain within execution group
• CONTEXT:
  • Domain description
  • Execution group ID and metadata
  • Related codebase files
  • Prior domain results within same group
  • Cross-group dependencies (if any)
• TASK: Analyze domain, identify tasks within group's ID range, define dependencies
• EXPECTED: JSON output with tasks, summaries, group-aware dependencies, effort estimates
• CONSTRAINTS:
  • Use only TASK IDs from assigned range
  • Document any cross-group dependencies
  • Flag files that might be modified by other groups

Cross-Group Dependency Handling:

• If a task depends on another group's completion, document as depends_on_group: "EG-XXX"
• Mark files that are likely modified by multiple groups as cross_group_risk: true

Step 2.3: Update plan-note.md Group Sections

Parse CLI output and update the plan-note.md sections for the current domain's group.

Task Summary Format (extended with group info):

• Task header: ### TASK-{ID}: {Title} [{domain}] [Group: {group_id}]
• Fields: 状态, 复杂度, 依赖, 范围, 执行组 (execution_group)
• Cross-group dependencies: 依赖执行组: EG-XXX
• Modification points with conflict risk flag
• Conflict risk assessment

Evidence Format (same as original)

Success Criteria:

• All domains processed sequentially
• agents/{domain}/plan.json created for each domain
• plan-note.md updated with group-aware task pools
• Cross-group dependencies explicitly documented
• Task IDs respect group ranges

---

Phase 3: Conflict Detection

Objective: Analyze plan-note.md for conflicts within and across execution groups.

Note: This phase extends original conflict detection with group-aware analysis.

Step 3.1: Parse plan-note.md (same as original)

Extract all tasks from all group sections.

Step 3.2: Detect Conflicts (Extended)

Scan all tasks for four categories of conflicts (added cross-group conflicts).

Conflict Types (extended):

Type	Severity	Detection Logic	Resolution
file_conflict	high	Same file:location modified by multiple domains within same group	Coordinate modification order
cross_group_file_conflict	critical	Same file modified by multiple execution groups	Requires merge coordination or branch rebase strategy
dependency_cycle	critical	Circular dependencies in task graph (within or across groups)	Remove or reorganize dependencies
strategy_conflict	medium	Multiple high-risk tasks in same file from different domains/groups	Review approaches and align on strategy

Detection Activities:

1. File Conflicts (Intra-Group): Group modification points by file:location within each group
2. Cross-Group File Conflicts: Identify files modified by multiple execution groups
3. Dependency Cycles: Build dependency graph including cross-group dependencies, detect cycles
4. Strategy Conflicts: Identify files with high-risk tasks from multiple groups

Cross-Group Conflict Detection:

• Parse cross_group_files[] from execution-groups.json
• Scan all tasks for files modified by multiple groups
• Flag as critical conflict requiring merge strategy

Step 3.3: Update execution-groups.json with Conflicts

Append detected cross-group conflicts to execution-groups.json.

Update Structure:

{
  "groups": [
    {
      "group_id": "EG-001",
      "cross_group_files": [
        {
          "file": "src/shared/config.ts",
          "conflicting_groups": ["EG-002"],
          "conflict_type": "both modify shared configuration",
          "resolution": "Coordinate changes or use merge strategy"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Step 3.4: Generate Conflict Artifacts (Extended)

Write conflict results with group context.

conflicts.json Structure (extended):

• detected_at: Detection timestamp
• total_conflicts: Number of conflicts
• intra_group_conflicts[]: Conflicts within single group
• cross_group_conflicts[]: ⭐ Conflicts across execution groups
• conflicts[]: All conflict objects with group IDs

plan-note.md Update: Populate "冲突标记" section with:

• Intra-group conflicts (can be resolved during group execution)
• Cross-group conflicts (require coordination or merge strategy)

Success Criteria:

• All tasks analyzed for intra-group and cross-group conflicts
• conflicts.json written with group-aware detection results
• execution-groups.json updated with cross_group_files
• plan-note.md updated with conflict markers
• Cross-group conflicts flagged as critical

---

Phase 4: Execution Strategy Generation

Objective: Generate branch strategy and codex execution commands for parallel development.

Step 4.1: Generate Branch Strategy

Create Git branch strategy for multi-branch parallel development.

Branch Strategy Decisions:

1. Independent Groups (no cross-group conflicts):

   • Each group works on independent branch from main
   • Branches can be merged independently
   • Parallel development fully supported

2. Dependent Groups (cross-group dependencies but no file conflicts):

   • Groups with dependencies must coordinate completion order
   • Independent branches, but merge order matters
   • Group A completes → merge to main → Group B starts/continues

3. Conflicting Groups (cross-group file conflicts):

   • Strategy 1: Sequential - Complete one group, merge, then start next
   • Strategy 2: Feature branch + rebase - Each group rebases on main periodically
   • Strategy 3: Shared integration branch - Both groups branch from shared base, coordinate merges

Default Strategy: Independent branches with merge order based on dependencies

Step 4.2: Generate execution-strategy.md

Create execution strategy document with concrete commands.

execution-strategy.md Structure:

# Execution Strategy: {session_id}

## Overview

- **Total Execution Groups**: {N}
- **Group Strategy**: {automatic|balanced|manual}
- **Branch Strategy**: {independent|dependent|conflicting}
- **Estimated Total Effort**: {sum of all groups}

## Execution Groups

### EG-001: Frontend Development
- **Codex Instance**: codex-1
- **Domains**: frontend, ui-components
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
- **Dependencies**: None (can start immediately)
- **Estimated Effort**: High

### EG-002: Backend Development
- **Codex Instance**: codex-2
- **Domains**: backend-api, database
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
- **Dependencies**: None (can start immediately)
- **Estimated Effort**: Medium

### EG-003: Testing
- **Codex Instance**: codex-3
- **Domains**: testing
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
- **Dependencies**: EG-001, EG-002 (must complete first)
- **Estimated Effort**: Low

## Branch Creation Commands

```bash
# Create branches for all execution groups
git checkout main
git pull

# Group 1: Frontend
git checkout -b feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
git push -u origin feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend

# Group 2: Backend
git checkout main
git checkout -b feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
git push -u origin feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend

# Group 3: Testing
git checkout main
git checkout -b feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
git push -u origin feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing

Parallel Execution Commands

Execute these commands in parallel (separate terminal sessions or background):

# Terminal 1: Execute Group 1 (Frontend)
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03/plan-note.md" \
  GROUP="EG-001" \
  /workflow:unified-execute-parallel

# Terminal 2: Execute Group 2 (Backend)
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03/plan-note.md" \
  GROUP="EG-002" \
  /workflow:unified-execute-parallel

# Terminal 3: Execute Group 3 (Testing) - starts after EG-001 and EG-002 complete
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03/plan-note.md" \
  GROUP="EG-003" \
  WAIT_FOR="EG-001,EG-002" \
  /workflow:unified-execute-parallel

Cross-Group Conflicts

Critical Conflicts Detected

1. File: src/shared/config.ts
   • Modified by: EG-001 (frontend), EG-002 (backend)
   • Resolution: Coordinate changes or use merge strategy
   • Recommendation: EG-001 completes first, EG-002 rebases before continuing

Resolution Strategy

• Option 1: Sequential execution (EG-001 → merge → EG-002 rebases)
• Option 2: Manual coordination (both groups align on config changes before execution)
• Option 3: Split file (refactor into separate configs if feasible)

Merge Strategy

Independent Groups (EG-001, EG-002)

# After EG-001 completes
git checkout main
git merge feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
git push

# After EG-002 completes
git checkout main
git merge feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
git push

Dependent Group (EG-003)

# After EG-001 and EG-002 merged to main
git checkout feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
git rebase main  # Update with latest changes
# Continue execution...

# After EG-003 completes
git checkout main
git merge feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
git push

Monitoring Progress

Track execution progress:

# Check execution logs for each group
cat .workflow/.execution/EXEC-eg-001-*/execution-events.md
cat .workflow/.execution/EXEC-eg-002-*/execution-events.md
cat .workflow/.execution/EXEC-eg-003-*/execution-events.md

Step 4.3: Generate plan.md Summary (Extended)

Create human-readable summary with execution group information.

plan.md Structure (extended):

Section	Content
Header	Session ID, task description, creation time
需求 (Requirements)	From plan-note.md "需求理解"
执行组划分 (Execution Groups)	⭐ Table of groups with domains, branches, codex assignments, dependencies
任务概览 (Task Overview)	All tasks grouped by execution group
冲突报告 (Conflict Report)	Intra-group and cross-group conflicts
执行策略 (Execution Strategy)	Branch strategy, parallel execution commands, merge order

Step 4.4: Display Completion Summary

Present session statistics with execution group information.

Summary Content:

• Session ID and directory path
• Total execution groups created
• Total domains planned
• Total tasks generated (per group and total)
• Conflict status (intra-group and cross-group)
• Execution strategy summary
• Next step: Use workflow:unified-execute-parallel with GROUP parameter

Success Criteria:

• execution-strategy.md generated with complete branch and execution strategy
• plan.md includes execution group information
• All artifacts present in session directory
• User informed of parallel execution approach and commands
• Cross-group conflicts clearly documented with resolution strategies

---

Configuration

Parameter	Default	Description
--max-groups	3	Maximum execution groups to create
--group-strategy	automatic	Group assignment: automatic / balanced / manual
--focus	None	Focus specific domain (optional)

Group Strategy Details:

• automatic: Group by dependency relationships (dependent domains in same group)
• balanced: Distribute evenly by estimated effort
• manual: Prompt user to assign domains to groups interactively

---

Error Handling & Recovery

Situation	Action	Recovery
Too many groups requested	Limit to maxGroups	Merge low-effort domains
Circular group dependencies	Stop execution, report error	Reorganize domain assignments
All domains in one group	Warning: No parallelization	Continue or prompt user to split
Cross-group file conflicts	Flag as critical	Suggest resolution strategies
Manual grouping timeout	Fall back to automatic	Continue with automatic strategy

---

Best Practices

Before Starting Planning

1. Clear Task Description: Detailed requirements for better grouping
2. Understand Dependencies: Know which modules depend on each other
3. Choose Group Strategy:
   • Use automatic for dependency-heavy tasks
   • Use balanced for independent features
   • Use manual for complex architectures you understand well

During Planning

1. Review Group Assignments: Check execution-groups.json makes sense
2. Verify Dependencies: Cross-group dependencies should be minimal
3. Check Branch Names: Ensure branch names follow project conventions
4. Monitor Conflicts: Review conflicts.json for cross-group file conflicts

After Planning

1. Review Execution Strategy: Read execution-strategy.md carefully
2. Resolve Critical Conflicts: Address cross-group file conflicts before execution
3. Prepare Environments: Ensure multiple codex instances can run in parallel
4. Plan Merge Order: Understand which groups must merge first

---

Migration from Original Workflow

Existing collaborative-plan-with-file sessions can be converted to parallel execution:

1. Read existing plan-note.md and requirement-analysis.json
2. Assign sub-domains to execution groups (run Step 1.2 manually)
3. Generate execution-groups.json and execution-strategy.md
4. Use workflow:unified-execute-parallel for execution

---

Now execute collaborative-plan-parallel for: $TASK