Harmonize orchestrator files (ccw.md, ccw-coordinator.md) with cross-file consistency fixes, and add missing -y/--yes non-interactive bypass gates to 7 skills that declared auto mode support but had blocking AskUserQuestion calls: team-planex, issue:discover, issue:plan, issue:queue, issue:execute, workflow:debug-with-file, issue:from-brainstorm.
41 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| name | description | argument-hint | allowed-tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| ccw-coordinator | Command orchestration tool - analyze requirements, recommend chain, execute sequentially with state persistence | [task description] | Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Grep(*) |
CCW Coordinator Command
Interactive orchestration tool: analyze task → discover commands → recommend chain → execute sequentially → track state.
Execution Model: Pseudocode guidance. Claude intelligently executes each phase based on context.
Skill 映射
命令端口定义中的 workflow 操作通过 Skill() 调用。
| Skill | 包含操作 |
|---|---|
workflow-lite-plan |
lite-plan, lite-execute |
workflow-plan |
plan, plan-verify, replan |
workflow-execute |
execute |
workflow-multi-cli-plan |
multi-cli-plan |
workflow-test-fix |
test-fix-gen, test-cycle-execute |
workflow-tdd-plan |
tdd-plan, tdd-verify |
review-cycle |
review-session-cycle, review-module-cycle, review-cycle-fix |
brainstorm |
auto-parallel, artifacts, role-analysis, synthesis |
spec-generator |
product-brief → PRD → architecture → epics |
workflow:collaborative-plan-with-file |
understanding agent → parallel agents → plan-note.md |
workflow:roadmap-with-file |
strategic requirement roadmap → issue creation → execution-plan.json |
workflow:integration-test-cycle |
explore → test dev → test-fix cycle → reflection |
workflow:refactor-cycle |
tech debt discovery → prioritize → execute → validate |
team-planex |
planner + executor wave pipeline(适合大量零散 issue 或 roadmap 产出的清晰 issue,实现 0→1 开发) |
Core Concept: Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
What is a Minimum Execution Unit?
Definition: A set of commands that must execute together as an atomic group to achieve a meaningful workflow milestone. Splitting these commands breaks the logical flow and creates incomplete states.
Why This Matters:
- Prevents Incomplete States: Avoid stopping after task generation without execution
- User Experience: User gets complete results, not intermediate artifacts requiring manual follow-up
- Workflow Integrity: Maintains logical coherence of multi-step operations
Minimum Execution Units
Planning + Execution Units (规划+执行单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Implementation | lite-plan → lite-execute | Lightweight plan and immediate execution | Working code |
| Multi-CLI Planning | multi-cli-plan → lite-execute | Multi-perspective analysis and execution | Working code |
| Bug Fix | lite-plan (--bugfix) → lite-execute | Quick bug diagnosis and fix execution | Fixed code |
| Full Planning + Execution | plan → execute | Detailed planning and execution | Working code |
| Verified Planning + Execution | plan → plan-verify → execute | Planning with verification and execution | Working code |
| Replanning + Execution | replan → execute | Update plan and execute changes | Working code |
| TDD Planning + Execution | tdd-plan → execute | Test-driven development planning and execution | Working code |
| Test Generation + Execution | test-gen → execute | Generate test suite and execute | Generated tests |
| Spec-Driven Full Pipeline | spec-generator → plan → execute | Specification-driven development | Working code |
Testing Units (测试单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Validation | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute | Generate test tasks and execute test-fix cycle | Tests passed |
Review Units (审查单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code Review (Session) | review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix | Complete review cycle and apply fixes | Fixed code |
| Code Review (Module) | review-module-cycle → review-cycle-fix | Module review cycle and apply fixes | Fixed code |
Issue Units (Issue单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue Workflow | discover → plan → queue → execute | Complete issue lifecycle | Completed issues |
| Rapid-to-Issue | lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute | Bridge lite workflow to issue workflow | Completed issues |
| Brainstorm-to-Issue | from-brainstorm → queue → execute | Bridge brainstorm session to issue workflow | Completed issues |
With-File Units (文档化单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyze to Plan | analyze-with-file → lite-plan | Collaborative analysis → auto chain to lite-plan | discussion.md + code |
| Brainstorm to Plan | brainstorm-with-file → lite-plan | Multi-perspective ideation → auto chain to lite-plan | brainstorm.md + code |
| Debug With File | debug-with-file | Hypothesis-driven debugging with documentation | understanding.md |
| Collaborative Plan | collaborative-plan-with-file → unified-execute-with-file | Multi-agent collaborative planning and execution | plan-note.md + code |
| Roadmap Plan | roadmap-with-file → team-planex | Requirement decomposition and wave execution | execution-plan.json + code |
Cycle Units (循环单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integration Test Cycle | integration-test-cycle | Self-iterating integration test with reflection | Tests passed |
| Refactor Cycle | refactor-cycle | Tech debt discovery and refactoring | Refactored code |
Command-to-Unit Mapping (命令与最小单元的映射)
| Command | Can Precede | Atomic Units |
|---|---|---|
| lite-plan | lite-execute, convert-to-plan | Quick Implementation, Rapid-to-Issue, Bug Fix |
| multi-cli-plan | lite-execute | Multi-CLI Planning |
| plan | plan-verify, execute | Full Planning + Execution, Verified Planning + Execution |
| plan-verify | execute | Verified Planning + Execution |
| replan | execute | Replanning + Execution |
| test-gen | execute | Test Generation + Execution |
| tdd-plan | execute | TDD Planning + Execution |
| spec-generator | plan | Spec-Driven Full Pipeline |
| review-session-cycle | review-cycle-fix | Code Review (Session) |
| review-module-cycle | review-cycle-fix | Code Review (Module) |
| test-fix-gen | test-cycle-execute | Test Validation |
| issue:discover | issue:plan | Issue Workflow |
| issue:plan | issue:queue | Issue Workflow |
| convert-to-plan | issue:queue | Rapid-to-Issue |
| issue:queue | issue:execute | Issue Workflow, Rapid-to-Issue, Brainstorm-to-Issue |
| issue:from-brainstorm | issue:queue | Brainstorm-to-Issue |
| analyze-with-file | lite-plan (auto) | Analyze to Plan |
| brainstorm-with-file | lite-plan (auto), issue:from-brainstorm | Brainstorm to Plan, Brainstorm-to-Issue |
| collaborative-plan-with-file | unified-execute-with-file | Collaborative Plan |
| roadmap-with-file | team-planex | Roadmap Plan |
| unified-execute-with-file | (terminal) | Collaborative Plan |
| integration-test-cycle | (standalone) | Integration Test Cycle |
| refactor-cycle | (standalone) | Refactor Cycle |
| team-planex | (standalone) | Roadmap Plan (executor) |
| debug-with-file | (standalone) | Debug With File |
Atomic Group Rules
- Never Split Units: Coordinator must recommend complete units, not partial chains
- Multi-Unit Participation: Some commands can participate in multiple units (e.g., plan → execute or plan → plan-verify → execute)
- User Override: User can explicitly request partial execution (advanced mode)
- Visualization: Pipeline view shows unit boundaries with
【 】markers - Validation: Before execution, verify all unit commands are included
Example Pipeline with Units:
需求 → 【lite-plan → lite-execute】→ 代码 → 【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过
└──── Quick Implementation ────┘ └────── Test Validation ──────┘
3-Phase Workflow
Phase 1: Analyze Requirements
Parse task to extract: goal, scope, constraints, complexity, and task type.
function analyzeRequirements(taskDescription) {
return {
goal: extractMainGoal(taskDescription),
scope: extractScope(taskDescription),
constraints: extractConstraints(taskDescription),
complexity: determineComplexity(taskDescription),
task_type: detectTaskType(taskDescription)
};
}
// Task Type Detection Patterns (harmonized with ccw.md priority order)
function detectTaskType(text) {
// Priority order (first match wins)
// Urgent bugfix (dual condition - must come first)
if (/urgent|production|critical/.test(text) && /fix|bug/.test(text)) return 'bugfix-hotfix';
// With-File workflow patterns (specific keywords - must come before generic bugfix)
if (/brainstorm.*issue|头脑风暴.*issue|idea.*issue|想法.*issue|从.*头脑风暴|convert.*brainstorm/.test(text)) return 'brainstorm-to-issue';
if (/brainstorm|ideation|头脑风暴|创意|发散思维|creative thinking/.test(text)) return 'brainstorm-file';
if (/debug.*document|hypothesis.*debug|深度调试|假设.*验证|systematic debug/.test(text)) return 'debug-file';
if (/analyze.*document|collaborative analysis|协作分析|深度.*理解/.test(text)) return 'analyze-file';
if (/collaborative.*plan|协作.*规划|多人.*规划|multi.*agent.*plan|Plan Note|分工.*规划/.test(text)) return 'collaborative-plan';
if (/roadmap|需求.*规划|需求.*拆解|requirement.*plan|progressive.*plan|路线.*图/.test(text)) return 'roadmap';
if (/spec.*gen|specification|PRD|产品需求|产品文档|产品规格/.test(text)) return 'spec-driven';
// Cycle workflow patterns
if (/integration.*test|集成测试|端到端.*测试|e2e.*test|integration.*cycle/.test(text)) return 'integration-test';
if (/refactor|重构|tech.*debt|技术债务/.test(text)) return 'refactor';
// Team workflows (kept: team-planex only)
if (/team.*plan.*exec|team.*planex|团队.*规划.*执行|并行.*规划.*执行|wave.*pipeline/.test(text)) return 'team-planex';
// Standard workflows
if (/multi.*cli|多.*CLI|多模型.*协作|multi.*model.*collab/.test(text)) return 'multi-cli';
if (/fix|bug|error|crash|fail|debug|diagnose/.test(text)) return 'bugfix';
if (/tdd|test-driven|先写测试|test first/.test(text)) return 'tdd';
if (/测试失败|test fail|fix test|failing test/.test(text)) return 'test-fix';
if (/generate test|写测试|add test|补充测试/.test(text)) return 'test-gen';
if (/review|审查|code review/.test(text)) return 'review';
// Issue workflow patterns
if (/issues?.*batch|batch.*issues?|批量.*issue|issue.*批量/.test(text)) return 'issue-batch';
if (/issue workflow|structured workflow|queue|multi-stage|转.*issue|issue.*流程/.test(text)) return 'issue-transition';
// Additional task types (harmonized with ccw.md)
if (/不确定|explore|研究|what if|权衡/.test(text)) return 'exploration';
if (/quick|simple|small/.test(text) && /feature|function/.test(text)) return 'quick-task';
if (/ui|design|component|style/.test(text)) return 'ui-design';
if (/docs|documentation|readme/.test(text)) return 'documentation';
return 'feature'; // Default
}
// Complexity Assessment
function determineComplexity(text) {
let score = 0;
if (/refactor|重构|migrate|迁移|architect|架构|system|系统/.test(text)) score += 2;
if (/multiple|多个|across|跨|all|所有|entire|整个/.test(text)) score += 2;
if (/integrate|集成|api|database|数据库/.test(text)) score += 1;
if (/security|安全|performance|性能|scale|扩展/.test(text)) score += 1;
return score >= 4 ? 'complex' : score >= 2 ? 'medium' : 'simple';
}
Display to user:
Analysis Complete:
Goal: [extracted goal]
Scope: [identified areas]
Constraints: [identified constraints]
Complexity: [level]
Task Type: [detected type]
Phase 2: Discover Commands & Recommend Chain
Dynamic command chain assembly using port-based matching.
Command Port Definition
Each command has input/output ports (tags) for pipeline composition:
const commandPorts = {
'lite-plan': {
name: 'lite-plan',
input: ['requirement', 'discussion-document', 'brainstorm-document'],
output: ['plan'],
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_group: 'quick-implementation'
},
'lite-execute': {
name: 'lite-execute',
input: ['plan', 'multi-cli-plan'],
output: ['code'],
tags: ['execution'],
atomic_groups: ['quick-implementation', 'multi-cli-planning', 'bug-fix']
},
'plan': {
name: 'plan',
input: ['requirement', 'specification'],
output: ['detailed-plan'],
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_groups: ['full-planning-execution', 'verified-planning-execution', 'spec-driven']
},
'plan-verify': {
name: 'plan-verify',
input: ['detailed-plan'],
output: ['verified-plan'],
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_group: 'verified-planning-execution'
},
'replan': {
name: 'replan',
input: ['session', 'feedback'],
output: ['replan'],
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_group: 'replanning-execution'
},
'execute': {
name: 'execute',
input: ['detailed-plan', 'verified-plan', 'replan', 'test-tasks', 'tdd-tasks'],
output: ['code'],
tags: ['execution'],
atomic_groups: ['full-planning-execution', 'verified-planning-execution', 'replanning-execution', 'test-generation-execution', 'tdd-planning-execution', 'spec-driven']
},
'test-cycle-execute': {
name: 'test-cycle-execute',
input: ['test-tasks'],
output: ['test-passed'],
tags: ['testing'],
atomic_group: 'test-validation',
note: '需要先执行test-fix-gen生成测试任务,再由此命令执行测试周期'
},
'tdd-plan': {
name: 'tdd-plan',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['tdd-tasks'],
tags: ['planning', 'tdd'],
atomic_group: 'tdd-planning-execution'
},
'tdd-verify': {
name: 'tdd-verify',
input: ['code'],
output: ['tdd-verified'],
tags: ['testing'],
note: 'Internal sub-command of workflow-tdd-plan Skill, not in explicit pipelines'
},
'lite-plan-bugfix': {
name: 'lite-plan',
input: ['bug-report'],
output: ['plan'],
tags: ['bugfix', 'planning'],
atomic_group: 'bug-fix',
type: 'skill',
note: '通过 --bugfix 参数传递 bugfix 语义'
},
'debug': {
name: 'debug',
input: ['bug-report'],
output: ['debug-log'],
tags: ['bugfix'],
note: 'Standalone debug sub-command, used internally by lite-plan --bugfix'
},
'test-gen': {
name: 'test-gen',
input: ['code', 'session'],
output: ['test-tasks'],
tags: ['testing'],
atomic_group: 'test-generation-execution'
},
'test-fix-gen': {
name: 'test-fix-gen',
input: ['failing-tests', 'session'],
output: ['test-tasks'],
tags: ['testing'],
atomic_group: 'test-validation',
note: '生成测试任务供test-cycle-execute执行'
},
'review': {
name: 'review',
input: ['code', 'session'],
output: ['review-findings'],
tags: ['review'],
note: 'Base review command, pipelines use review-session-cycle or review-module-cycle instead'
},
'review-cycle-fix': {
name: 'review-cycle-fix',
input: ['review-findings', 'review-verified'],
output: ['fixed-code'],
tags: ['review'],
atomic_group: 'code-review'
},
'brainstorm': {
name: 'brainstorm',
input: ['exploration-topic'],
output: ['brainstorm-analysis'],
tags: ['brainstorm'],
type: 'skill'
},
'multi-cli-plan': {
name: 'multi-cli-plan',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['multi-cli-plan'],
tags: ['planning', 'multi-cli'],
atomic_group: 'multi-cli-planning'
},
'review-session-cycle': {
name: 'review-session-cycle',
input: ['code', 'session'],
output: ['review-verified'],
tags: ['review'],
atomic_group: 'code-review'
},
'review-module-cycle': {
name: 'review-module-cycle',
input: ['module-pattern'],
output: ['review-verified'],
tags: ['review'],
atomic_group: 'code-review'
},
// Issue workflow commands
'issue:discover': {
name: 'issue:discover',
input: ['codebase'],
output: ['pending-issues'],
tags: ['issue'],
atomic_group: 'issue-workflow'
},
'issue:plan': {
name: 'issue:plan',
input: ['pending-issues'],
output: ['issue-plans'],
tags: ['issue'],
atomic_group: 'issue-workflow'
},
'issue:queue': {
name: 'issue:queue',
input: ['issue-plans', 'converted-plan'],
output: ['execution-queue'],
tags: ['issue'],
atomic_groups: ['issue-workflow', 'rapid-to-issue']
},
'issue:execute': {
name: 'issue:execute',
input: ['execution-queue'],
output: ['completed-issues'],
tags: ['issue'],
atomic_groups: ['issue-workflow', 'rapid-to-issue']
},
'issue:convert-to-plan': {
name: 'issue:convert-to-plan',
input: ['plan'],
output: ['converted-plan'],
tags: ['issue', 'planning'],
atomic_group: 'rapid-to-issue'
},
// With-File workflows
'brainstorm-with-file': {
name: 'brainstorm-with-file',
input: ['exploration-topic'],
output: ['brainstorm-document'],
tags: ['brainstorm', 'with-file'],
atomic_group: 'brainstorm-to-plan',
note: 'Auto chains to lite-plan with brainstorm artifacts'
},
'issue:from-brainstorm': {
name: 'issue:from-brainstorm',
input: ['brainstorm-document'],
output: ['converted-plan'],
tags: ['issue', 'brainstorm'],
atomic_group: 'brainstorm-to-issue'
},
'debug-with-file': {
name: 'debug-with-file',
input: ['bug-report'],
output: ['understanding-document'],
tags: ['bugfix', 'with-file'],
note: 'Self-contained workflow with hypothesis-driven iteration'
},
'analyze-with-file': {
name: 'analyze-with-file',
input: ['analysis-topic'],
output: ['discussion-document'],
tags: ['analysis', 'with-file'],
atomic_group: 'analyze-to-plan',
note: 'Auto chains to lite-plan with analysis artifacts'
},
// Collaborative planning workflows
'collaborative-plan-with-file': {
name: 'collaborative-plan-with-file',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['plan-note'],
tags: ['planning', 'with-file'],
atomic_group: 'collaborative-plan',
note: 'Multi-agent collaborative planning with Plan Note shared doc'
},
'unified-execute-with-file': {
name: 'unified-execute-with-file',
input: ['plan-note', 'brainstorm-document', 'discussion-document'],
output: ['code'],
tags: ['execution', 'with-file'],
atomic_group: 'collaborative-plan'
},
'roadmap-with-file': {
name: 'roadmap-with-file',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['execution-plan'],
tags: ['planning', 'with-file'],
atomic_group: 'roadmap-plan',
note: 'Requirement decomposition with issue creation'
},
// Spec-driven workflow
'spec-generator': {
name: 'spec-generator',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['specification'],
tags: ['planning', 'specification'],
atomic_group: 'spec-driven',
note: '6-phase specification: product-brief → PRD → architecture → epics'
},
// Cycle workflows (self-iterating with reflection)
'integration-test-cycle': {
name: 'integration-test-cycle',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['test-passed'],
tags: ['testing', 'cycle'],
note: 'Self-contained: explore → test dev → test-fix cycle → reflection'
},
'refactor-cycle': {
name: 'refactor-cycle',
input: ['codebase'],
output: ['refactored-code'],
tags: ['refactoring', 'cycle'],
note: 'Self-contained: tech debt discovery → prioritize → execute → validate'
},
// Team workflows (kept: team-planex only)
'team-planex': {
name: 'team-planex',
input: ['requirement', 'execution-plan'],
output: ['code'],
tags: ['team'],
note: 'Self-contained: planner + executor wave pipeline'
}
};
Recommendation Algorithm
async function recommendCommandChain(analysis) {
const { inputPort, outputPort } = determinePortFlow(analysis.task_type, analysis.constraints);
const chain = selectChainByPorts(inputPort, outputPort, analysis);
return chain;
}
function determinePortFlow(taskType, constraints) {
const flows = {
'bugfix': { inputPort: 'bug-report', outputPort: constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? 'fixed-code' : 'test-passed' },
'tdd': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'tdd-verified' },
'test-fix': { inputPort: 'failing-tests', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
'test-gen': { inputPort: 'code', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
'review': { inputPort: 'code', outputPort: 'review-verified' },
'brainstorm': { inputPort: 'exploration-topic', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
'multi-cli': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
// Issue workflow types
'issue-batch': { inputPort: 'codebase', outputPort: 'completed-issues' },
'issue-transition': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'completed-issues' },
// With-File workflow types (auto chain to lite-plan)
'brainstorm-file': { inputPort: 'exploration-topic', outputPort: 'code' },
'brainstorm-to-issue': { inputPort: 'brainstorm-document', outputPort: 'completed-issues' },
'debug-file': { inputPort: 'bug-report', outputPort: 'understanding-document' },
'analyze-file': { inputPort: 'analysis-topic', outputPort: 'code' },
'collaborative-plan': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'code' },
'roadmap': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'code' },
'spec-driven': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
// Cycle workflow types
'integration-test': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
'refactor': { inputPort: 'codebase', outputPort: 'refactored-code' },
// Team workflows (kept: team-planex only)
'team-planex': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'code' },
// Additional task types (harmonized with ccw.md)
'bugfix-hotfix': { inputPort: 'bug-report', outputPort: 'fixed-code' },
'exploration': { inputPort: 'exploration-topic', outputPort: 'test-passed' },
'quick-task': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? 'code' : 'test-passed' },
'ui-design': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'code' },
'documentation': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: 'code' },
'feature': { inputPort: 'requirement', outputPort: constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? 'code' : 'test-passed' }
};
return flows[taskType] || flows['feature'];
}
Display to User
Recommended Command Chain:
Pipeline (管道视图):
需求 → lite-plan → 计划 → lite-execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Commands (命令列表):
1. /workflow-lite-plan
2. /workflow:lite-execute
3. /workflow-test-fix
Proceed? [Confirm / Show Details / Adjust / Cancel]
Phase 2b: Get User Confirmation
async function getUserConfirmation(chain) {
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: 'Proceed with this command chain?',
header: 'Confirm',
options: [
{ label: 'Confirm and execute', description: 'Proceed with commands' },
{ label: 'Show details', description: 'View each command' },
{ label: 'Adjust chain', description: 'Remove or reorder' },
{ label: 'Cancel', description: 'Abort' }
]
}]
});
if (response.confirm === 'Cancel') throw new Error('Cancelled');
if (response.confirm === 'Show details') {
displayCommandDetails(chain);
return getUserConfirmation(chain);
}
if (response.confirm === 'Adjust chain') {
return await adjustChain(chain);
}
return chain;
}
Phase 3: Execute Sequential Command Chain
async function executeCommandChain(chain, analysis) {
const sessionId = `ccw-coord-${Date.now()}`;
const stateDir = `.workflow/.ccw-coordinator/${sessionId}`;
Bash(`mkdir -p "${stateDir}"`);
const state = {
session_id: sessionId,
status: 'running',
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
analysis: analysis,
command_chain: chain.map((cmd, idx) => ({ ...cmd, index: idx, status: 'pending' })),
execution_results: [],
prompts_used: []
};
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
for (let i = 0; i < chain.length; i++) {
const cmd = chain[i];
console.log(`[${i+1}/${chain.length}] ${cmd.command}`);
state.command_chain[i].status = 'running';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
let promptContent = formatCommand(cmd, state.execution_results, analysis);
let prompt = `${promptContent}\n\nTask: ${analysis.goal}`;
if (state.execution_results.length > 0) {
prompt += '\n\nPrevious results:\n';
state.execution_results.forEach(r => {
if (r.session_id) {
prompt += `- ${r.command}: ${r.session_id} (${r.artifacts?.join(', ') || 'completed'})\n`;
}
});
}
state.prompts_used.push({ index: i, command: cmd.command, prompt: prompt });
try {
const taskId = Bash(
`ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(prompt)}" --tool claude --mode write`,
{ run_in_background: true }
).task_id;
state.execution_results.push({
index: i, command: cmd.command, status: 'in-progress',
task_id: taskId, session_id: null, artifacts: [],
timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
});
state.command_chain[i].status = 'running';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
console.log(`[${i+1}/${chain.length}] ${cmd.command}\n`);
break; // Stop, wait for hook callback
} catch (error) {
state.command_chain[i].status = 'failed';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
const action = await AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: `${cmd.command} failed to start: ${error.message}. What to do?`,
header: 'Error',
options: [
{ label: 'Retry', description: 'Try again' },
{ label: 'Skip', description: 'Continue next command' },
{ label: 'Abort', description: 'Stop execution' }
]
}]
});
if (action.error === 'Retry') { state.command_chain[i].status = 'pending'; state.execution_results.pop(); i--; }
else if (action.error === 'Skip') { state.execution_results[state.execution_results.length - 1].status = 'skipped'; }
else if (action.error === 'Abort') { state.status = 'failed'; break; }
}
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
}
if (state.status !== 'failed') state.status = 'waiting';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
return state;
}
// Smart parameter assembly
function formatCommand(cmd, previousResults, analysis) {
let prompt = `/workflow:${cmd.name} -y`;
const name = cmd.name;
// Planning commands - take task description
if (['lite-plan', 'plan', 'tdd-plan', 'multi-cli-plan'].includes(name)) {
prompt += ` "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'lite-execute') {
const hasPlan = previousResults.some(r => r.command.includes('plan'));
prompt += hasPlan ? ' --in-memory' : ` "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'execute') {
const plan = previousResults.find(r => r.command.includes('plan'));
if (plan?.session_id) prompt += ` --resume-session="${plan.session_id}"`;
} else if (name === 'lite-plan' && analysis.task_type === 'bugfix') {
prompt += ` --bugfix "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'debug') {
prompt += ` "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'brainstorm') {
prompt = `/brainstorm -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'spec-generator') {
prompt = `/spec-generator -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'test-gen') {
const impl = previousResults.find(r => r.command.includes('execute') || r.command.includes('lite-execute'));
prompt += impl?.session_id ? ` "${impl.session_id}"` : ` "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'test-fix-gen') {
const latest = previousResults.filter(r => r.session_id).pop();
prompt += latest?.session_id ? ` "${latest.session_id}"` : ` "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'review') {
const latest = previousResults.filter(r => r.session_id).pop();
if (latest?.session_id) prompt += ` --session="${latest.session_id}"`;
} else if (name === 'review-cycle-fix') {
const review = previousResults.find(r => r.command.includes('review'));
const latest = review || previousResults.filter(r => r.session_id).pop();
if (latest?.session_id) prompt += ` --session="${latest.session_id}"`;
} else if (name === 'tdd-verify') {
const exec = previousResults.find(r => r.command.includes('execute'));
if (exec?.session_id) prompt += ` --session="${exec.session_id}"`;
} else if (name.includes('test') || name.includes('review') || name.includes('verify')) {
const latest = previousResults.filter(r => r.session_id).pop();
if (latest?.session_id) prompt += ` --session="${latest.session_id}"`;
// Issue workflow commands
} else if (name === 'issue:discover') {
prompt = `/issue:discover -y`;
} else if (name === 'issue:plan') {
prompt = `/issue:plan -y --all-pending`;
} else if (name === 'issue:queue') {
prompt = `/issue:queue -y`;
} else if (name === 'issue:execute') {
prompt = `/issue:execute -y --queue auto`;
} else if (name === 'issue:convert-to-plan' || name === 'convert-to-plan') {
prompt = `/issue:convert-to-plan -y --latest-lite-plan`;
// With-File workflows
} else if (name === 'brainstorm-with-file') {
prompt = `/workflow:brainstorm-with-file -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'debug-with-file') {
prompt = `/workflow:debug-with-file -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'analyze-with-file') {
prompt = `/workflow:analyze-with-file -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'issue:from-brainstorm' || name === 'from-brainstorm') {
const sessionMatch = analysis.goal.match(/BS-[\w-]+/);
prompt = sessionMatch
? `/issue:from-brainstorm -y SESSION="${sessionMatch[0]}" --auto`
: `/issue:from-brainstorm -y --auto`;
// Collaborative planning workflows
} else if (name === 'collaborative-plan-with-file') {
prompt = `/workflow:collaborative-plan-with-file -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'unified-execute-with-file') {
prompt = `/workflow:unified-execute-with-file -y`;
} else if (name === 'roadmap-with-file') {
prompt = `/workflow:roadmap-with-file -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
// Cycle workflows (self-contained)
} else if (name === 'integration-test-cycle') {
prompt = `/workflow:integration-test-cycle -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
} else if (name === 'refactor-cycle') {
prompt = `/workflow:refactor-cycle -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
// Team workflows (kept: team-planex only)
} else if (name === 'team-planex') {
prompt = `/team-planex -y "${analysis.goal}"`;
}
return prompt;
}
// Hook callback: Called when background CLI completes
async function handleCliCompletion(sessionId, taskId, output) {
const stateDir = `.workflow/.ccw-coordinator/${sessionId}`;
const state = JSON.parse(Read(`${stateDir}/state.json`));
const pendingIdx = state.execution_results.findIndex(r => r.task_id === taskId);
if (pendingIdx === -1) return;
const parsed = parseOutput(output);
const cmdIdx = state.execution_results[pendingIdx].index;
state.execution_results[pendingIdx] = {
...state.execution_results[pendingIdx],
status: parsed.sessionId ? 'completed' : 'failed',
session_id: parsed.sessionId,
artifacts: parsed.artifacts,
completed_at: new Date().toISOString()
};
state.command_chain[cmdIdx].status = parsed.sessionId ? 'completed' : 'failed';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
const nextIdx = cmdIdx + 1;
if (nextIdx < state.command_chain.length) {
await resumeChainExecution(sessionId, nextIdx);
} else {
state.status = 'completed';
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
}
}
State File Structure
Location: .workflow/.ccw-coordinator/{session_id}/state.json
{
"session_id": "ccw-coord-20250124-143025",
"status": "running|waiting|completed|failed",
"created_at": "2025-01-24T14:30:25Z",
"updated_at": "2025-01-24T14:35:45Z",
"analysis": {
"goal": "Implement user registration",
"scope": ["authentication", "user_management"],
"constraints": ["no breaking changes"],
"complexity": "medium"
},
"command_chain": [
{ "index": 0, "command": "/workflow-plan", "name": "plan", "status": "completed" },
{ "index": 1, "command": "/workflow-execute", "name": "execute", "status": "running" }
],
"execution_results": [
{
"index": 0, "command": "/workflow-plan", "status": "completed",
"task_id": "task-001", "session_id": "WFS-plan-20250124",
"artifacts": ["IMPL_PLAN.md"], "timestamp": "2025-01-24T14:30:25Z"
}
]
}
Status Values: running → waiting → completed | failed
Status Flow
running → waiting → [hook callback] → waiting → [hook callback] → completed
↓ ↑
failed ←────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Skill & Command Discovery
workflow 操作通过 Skill() 调用对应的 Skill。
// Skill 调用方式
Skill({ skill: 'workflow-lite-plan', args: '"task description"' });
Skill({ skill: 'workflow-execute', args: '--resume-session="WFS-xxx"' });
Skill({ skill: 'brainstorm', args: '"exploration topic"' });
Skill({ skill: 'spec-generator', args: '"product specification"' });
// 命名空间命令调用方式
Skill({ skill: 'workflow:brainstorm-with-file', args: '"topic"' });
Skill({ skill: 'workflow:roadmap-with-file', args: '"requirement"' });
Skill({ skill: 'issue:discover', args: '' });
CLI Execution Model
CLI Invocation Format
IMPORTANT: The ccw cli command executes prompts through external tools. The format is:
ccw cli -p "PROMPT_CONTENT" --tool <tool> --mode <mode>
Parameters:
-p "PROMPT_CONTENT": The prompt content to execute (required)--tool <tool>: CLI tool to use (e.g.,claude,gemini,qwen)--mode <mode>: Execution mode (analysisorwrite)
Note: -y is a command parameter inside the prompt, NOT a ccw cli parameter.
Prompt Assembly
The prompt content MUST start with the workflow command, followed by task context:
/workflow:<command> -y <parameters>
Task: <description>
<optional_context>
Serial Blocking
CRITICAL: Commands execute one-by-one. After launching CLI in background:
- Orchestrator stops immediately (
break) - Wait for hook callback - DO NOT use TaskOutput polling
- Hook callback triggers next command
Available Skills & Commands
Skills
| Skill | 包含操作 |
|---|---|
workflow-lite-plan |
lite-plan, lite-execute |
workflow-plan |
plan, plan-verify, replan |
workflow-execute |
execute |
workflow-multi-cli-plan |
multi-cli-plan |
workflow-test-fix |
test-fix-gen, test-cycle-execute |
workflow-tdd-plan |
tdd-plan, tdd-verify |
review-cycle |
review-session-cycle, review-module-cycle, review-cycle-fix |
brainstorm |
auto-parallel, artifacts, role-analysis, synthesis |
spec-generator |
product-brief → PRD → architecture → epics |
team-planex |
planner + executor wave pipeline |
Commands(命名空间 Skill)
With-File Workflows: workflow:brainstorm-with-file, workflow:debug-with-file, workflow:analyze-with-file, workflow:collaborative-plan-with-file, workflow:roadmap-with-file Cycle Workflows: workflow:integration-test-cycle, workflow:refactor-cycle Execution: workflow:unified-execute-with-file Design: workflow:ui-design:* Session Management: workflow:session:start, workflow:session:resume, workflow:session:complete, workflow:session:solidify, workflow:session:list, workflow:session:sync Utility: workflow:clean, workflow:init, workflow:init-guidelines, workflow:status Issue Workflow: issue:discover, issue:discover-by-prompt, issue:plan, issue:queue, issue:execute, issue:convert-to-plan, issue:from-brainstorm, issue:new
Testing Commands Distinction
| Command | Purpose | Output | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| test-gen | 广泛测试示例生成并进行测试 | test-tasks (IMPL-001, IMPL-002) | Skill(workflow-execute) |
| test-fix-gen | 针对特定问题生成测试并在测试中修正 | test-tasks | Skill(workflow-test-fix) → test-cycle-execute |
| test-cycle-execute | 执行测试周期(迭代测试和修复) | test-passed | N/A (终点) |
Task Type Routing (Pipeline Summary)
Note: 【 】 marks Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元) - these commands must execute together.
| Task Type | Pipeline | Minimum Units |
|---|---|---|
| feature (simple) | 需求 →【lite-plan → lite-execute】→ 代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过 | Quick Implementation + Test Validation |
| feature (complex) | 需求 →【plan → plan-verify】→ validate → execute → 代码 → review → fix | Full Planning + Code Review + Testing |
| bugfix | Bug报告 → lite-plan (--bugfix) → 修复代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过 | Bug Fix + Test Validation |
| tdd | 需求 → tdd-plan → TDD任务 → execute → 代码 → tdd-verify | TDD Planning + Execution |
| test-fix | 失败测试 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过 | Test Validation |
| test-gen | 代码/会话 →【test-gen → execute】→ 测试通过 | Test Generation + Execution |
| review | 代码 →【review-* → review-cycle-fix】→ 修复代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过 | Code Review + Testing |
| brainstorm | 探索主题 → brainstorm → 分析 →【plan → plan-verify】→ execute → test | Exploration + Planning + Execution |
| multi-cli | 需求 → multi-cli-plan → 对比分析 → lite-execute → test | Multi-Perspective + Testing |
| spec-driven | 需求 →【spec-generator → plan → execute】→ 代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过 | Spec-Driven + Testing |
| issue-batch | 代码库 →【discover → plan → queue → execute】→ 完成 issues | Issue Workflow |
| issue-transition | 需求 →【lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute】→ 完成 issues | Rapid-to-Issue |
| analyze-file | 分析主题 →【analyze-with-file → lite-plan → lite-execute】→ 代码 | Analyze to Plan |
| brainstorm-file | 主题 →【brainstorm-with-file → lite-plan → lite-execute】→ 代码 | Brainstorm to Plan |
| brainstorm-to-issue | brainstorm.md →【from-brainstorm → queue → execute】→ 完成 issues | Brainstorm to Issue |
| debug-file | Bug报告 → debug-with-file → understanding.md (自包含) | Debug With File |
| collaborative-plan | 需求 →【collaborative-plan-with-file → unified-execute-with-file】→ 代码 | Collaborative Plan |
| roadmap | 需求 →【roadmap-with-file → team-planex】→ 代码 | Roadmap Plan |
| integration-test | 需求/模块 → integration-test-cycle → 测试通过 (自包含) | Integration Test Cycle |
| refactor | 代码库 → refactor-cycle → 重构后代码 (自包含) | Refactor Cycle |
| team-planex | 需求 → team-planex → 代码 (自包含) | Team Plan+Execute |
| bugfix-hotfix | Bug报告(紧急) → lite-plan (--hotfix) → 修复代码 | Hotfix (skip tests) |
| exploration | 探索主题 → brainstorm →【plan → execute】→ 代码 → test | Exploration + Planning |
| quick-task | 需求 →【lite-plan → lite-execute】→ 代码 → test | Quick Implementation |
| ui-design | UI需求 → ui-design:explore → plan → execute → 代码 | UI Design |
| documentation | 文档需求 → lite-plan → lite-execute → 文档 | Documentation |
Refer to the Skill 映射 section above for available Skills and Commands.