mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
- Add batch processing mode to /task:replan command - Support for verification report input - TodoWrite integration for progress tracking - Automatic backup management - Enhance /workflow:action-plan-verify with batch remediation - Save verification report to .process directory - Provide batch replan command suggestions - Add comprehensive skill documentation - Codex: autonomous development workflows - Gemini/Qwen: code analysis and documentation - Context-search: strategic context gathering - Prompt-enhancer: ambiguous prompt refinement - Clean up CLAUDE.md strategy references 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.8 KiB
3.8 KiB
Gemini Analysis Mode Examples
📖 Template Structure: See Universal Template Structure for detailed field guidelines.
All examples demonstrate read-only analysis mode with comprehensive template usage.
Example 1: Architecture Analysis with Multiple Constraints
cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: Analyze authentication system architecture to identify security risks and scalability issues
TASK: Review JWT implementation, token management, session handling, and middleware integration
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{**/*.ts,**/*.json} Current system handles 10k users, planning to scale to 100k
EXPECTED: Architecture analysis report covering: security vulnerabilities, scalability bottlenecks, integration risks, priority recommendations with effort estimates
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt) | Focus on OWASP Top 10 | Follow OAuth 2.0 best practices | Consider microservices migration path | Include performance metrics
"
Key Points:
- PURPOSE: Clear goal (analyze) + reason (identify risks)
- TASK: Multiple specific aspects to review
- CONTEXT: File patterns + business context (scale requirements)
- EXPECTED: Multiple deliverables with specific coverage
- RULES: Template + multiple constraints separated by
|
Example 2: Pattern Discovery with Output Specifications
cd src && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: Identify and document error handling patterns to establish coding standards
TASK: Analyze error handling across all modules, categorize patterns (try-catch, promise rejection, async/await, custom error classes), identify inconsistencies
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{**/*.ts,!**/*.test.ts,!**/node_modules/**} Team size 5 developers, TypeScript 5.0, Node 20 LTS
EXPECTED: Pattern analysis document including: 1) Pattern catalog with code examples, 2) Consistency score by module, 3) Recommended standard pattern, 4) Migration guide from inconsistent patterns to standard
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt) | Focus on async/await patterns | Exclude test files | Consider error logging integration | Follow TypeScript strict mode conventions
"
Key Points:
- TASK: Break down into sub-tasks (analyze → categorize → identify)
- CONTEXT: Exclude patterns with
!+ tech stack context - EXPECTED: Numbered deliverables with clear output structure
- RULES: Multiple focus areas + exclusions + tech constraints
Example 3: Multi-Module Analysis with Dependency Tracing
~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: Understand data flow from API to database to identify performance bottlenecks
TASK: Trace data flow through: API endpoints → Controllers → Services → Repositories → Database, identify transformation points, analyze query patterns, measure complexity at each layer
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*.ts,src/controllers/**/*.ts,src/services/**/*.ts,src/repositories/**/*.ts,src/models/**/*.ts,CLAUDE.md} Current API response time avg 500ms, target <200ms
EXPECTED: Data flow diagram (Mermaid format), transformation analysis per layer, query complexity report, performance bottleneck identification with impact scores (high/medium/low), optimization recommendations prioritized by ROI
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt) | Map all transformation points | Identify N+1 query problems | Consider caching opportunities | Include database index recommendations | Follow repository pattern standards
"
Key Points:
- TASK: Multi-step trace with specific layers
- CONTEXT: Multiple module paths + performance metrics
- EXPECTED: Multiple output formats (diagram + reports) with prioritization
- RULES: Comprehensive constraint list with specific technical focuses