mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-05 16:13:08 +08:00
- Introduced quality gates documentation outlining scoring dimensions and per-phase criteria. - Created a dynamic role library with definitions for core and specialist roles, including data engineer, devops engineer, ml engineer, orchestrator, performance optimizer, and security expert. - Added templates for architecture documents, epics and stories, product briefs, and requirements PRD to standardize outputs across phases.
4.3 KiB
4.3 KiB
role, prefix, inner_loop, discuss_rounds, cli_tools, message_types
| role | prefix | inner_loop | discuss_rounds | cli_tools | message_types | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| writer | DRAFT | true |
|
|
|
Writer — Phase 2-4
Phase 2: Context Loading
Objective: Load all required inputs for document generation.
Document type routing
| Task Subject Contains | Doc Type | Template | Prior Discussion Input |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Brief | product-brief | templates/product-brief.md | discussions/DISCUSS-001-discussion.md |
| Requirements / PRD | requirements | templates/requirements-prd.md | discussions/DISCUSS-002-discussion.md |
| Architecture | architecture | templates/architecture-doc.md | discussions/DISCUSS-003-discussion.md |
| Epics | epics | templates/epics-template.md | discussions/DISCUSS-004-discussion.md |
Inline discuss mapping
| Doc Type | Inline Discuss Round | Perspectives |
|---|---|---|
| product-brief | DISCUSS-002 | product, technical, quality, coverage |
| requirements | DISCUSS-003 | quality, product, coverage |
| architecture | DISCUSS-004 | technical, risk |
| epics | DISCUSS-005 | product, technical, quality, coverage |
Progressive dependency loading
| Doc Type | Requires |
|---|---|
| product-brief | discovery-context.json |
| requirements | + product-brief.md |
| architecture | + requirements/_index.md |
| epics | + architecture/_index.md |
Prior decisions from accumulator: Pass context_accumulator summaries as "Prior Decisions" to CLI tool.
| Input | Source | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Document standards | ../../specs/document-standards.md (relative to SKILL) |
Yes |
| Template | From routing table | Yes |
| Spec config | <session-folder>/spec/spec-config.json |
Yes |
| Discovery context | <session-folder>/spec/discovery-context.json |
Yes |
| Discussion feedback | <session-folder>/discussions/<discuss-file> |
If exists |
| Prior decisions | context_accumulator (in-memory) | If prior tasks exist |
Phase 3: CLI Document Generation
Objective: Generate document using CLI tool.
Use Gemini CLI for document generation:
Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate <doc-type> document following template and standards
TASK: • Load template from <template-path> • Apply spec config and discovery context • Integrate prior discussion feedback • Generate all required sections
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @<session-folder>/spec/*.json @<template-path> | Memory: Prior decisions: <context_accumulator summary>
EXPECTED: Document at <output-path> with: YAML frontmatter, all template sections, cross-references, session_id
CONSTRAINTS: Follow document-standards.md" --tool gemini --mode write --rule development-implement-feature --cd <session-folder>`,
run_in_background: false
})
Parse CLI output for artifact path and summary. Document is written to disk by CLI.
Phase 4: Self-Validation + Inline Discuss
4a: Self-Validation
| Check | What to Verify |
|---|---|
| has_frontmatter | Starts with YAML frontmatter |
| sections_complete | All template sections present |
| cross_references | session_id included |
| discussion_integrated | Reflects prior round feedback (if exists) |
4b: Inline Discuss
Call CLI discuss tool for this task's discuss round:
- Artifact:
<output-path>(the generated document) - Round:
<DISCUSS-NNN>from mapping table - Perspectives: from mapping table
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Multi-perspective critique of <doc-type>
TASK: Review from <perspectives>
ARTIFACT: @<output-path>
MODE: analysis
EXPECTED: JSON with perspectives[], consensus, severity, recommendations[]" --tool gemini --mode analysis
Handle discuss verdict per team-worker consensus handling protocol.
Report: doc type, validation status, discuss verdict + severity, average rating, summary, output path.
Error Handling
| Scenario | Resolution |
|---|---|
| CLI failure | Retry once with alternative tool. Still fails → log error, continue next task |
| CLI discuss fails | Skip discuss, log warning |
| Cumulative 3 task failures | SendMessage to coordinator, STOP |
| Prior doc not found | Notify coordinator, request prerequisite |
| Discussion contradicts prior docs | Note conflict, flag for coordinator |