Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/skills/team-command-designer/specs/quality-standards.md

Quality Standards for Team Commands

Quality assessment criteria for generated team command .md files.

When to Use

Phase	Usage	Section
Phase 5	Score generated command	All dimensions
Phase 3	Guide generation quality	Checklist

---

Quality Dimensions

1. Completeness (25%)

Score	Criteria
100%	All 15 required sections present with substantive content
80%	12+ sections present, minor gaps in non-critical areas
60%	Core sections present (front matter, message bus, 5 phases, error handling)
40%	Missing critical sections
0%	Skeleton only

Required Sections Checklist:

• YAML front matter with group: team
• Overview with core capabilities
• Role Definition (name, responsibility, communication)
• Message Bus section with team_msg examples
• Message Types table
• Execution Process overview diagram
• Phase 1: Task Discovery implementation
• Phase 2: Context Loading implementation
• Phase 3: Core Work implementation
• Phase 4: Validation/Summary implementation
• Phase 5: Report + Loop implementation
• Error Handling table
• Code examples in all phases

2. Pattern Compliance (25%)

Score	Criteria
100%	All 8 infrastructure patterns + selected collaboration patterns fully implemented
80%	6 core infra patterns + at least 1 collaboration pattern with convergence
60%	Minimum 6 infra patterns, collaboration patterns present but incomplete
40%	Missing critical patterns (message bus or task lifecycle)
0%	No pattern compliance

Infrastructure Pattern Checklist:

• Pattern 1: Message bus - team_msg before every SendMessage
• Pattern 2: YAML front matter - all fields present, group: team
• Pattern 3: Task lifecycle - TaskList/Get/Update flow
• Pattern 4: Five-phase structure - all 5 phases present
• Pattern 5: Complexity-adaptive (if applicable)
• Pattern 6: Coordinator spawn compatible
• Pattern 7: Error handling table
• Pattern 8: Session files (if applicable)

Collaboration Pattern Checklist:

• At least one CP selected (CP-1 minimum)
• Each selected CP has convergence criteria defined
• Each selected CP has feedback loop mechanism
• Each selected CP has timeout/fallback behavior
• CP-specific message types registered in message bus section
• Escalation path defined (CP-5) for error scenarios

3. Integration (25%)

Score	Criteria
100%	All integration checks pass, spawn snippet ready
80%	Minor integration notes, no blocking issues
60%	Some checks need attention but functional
40%	Task prefix conflict or missing critical tools
0%	Incompatible with team system

4. Consistency (25%)

Score	Criteria
100%	Role name, task prefix, message types consistent throughout
80%	Minor inconsistencies in non-critical areas
60%	Some mixed terminology but intent clear
40%	Confusing or contradictory content
0%	Internally inconsistent

---

Quality Gates

Gate	Threshold	Action
PASS	>= 80%	Deliver to .claude/commands/team/{team-name}/
REVIEW	60-79%	Fix recommendations, re-validate
FAIL	< 60%	Major rework needed, re-run from Phase 3

---

Issue Classification

Errors (Must Fix)

• Missing YAML front matter
• Missing group: team
• No message bus section
• No task lifecycle (TaskList/Get/Update)
• No SendMessage to coordinator
• Task prefix conflicts with existing

Warnings (Should Fix)

• Missing error handling table
• Incomplete Phase implementation (skeleton only)
• Missing team_msg before some SendMessage calls
• No complexity-adaptive routing when role is complex

Info (Nice to Have)

• Code examples could be more detailed
• Additional message type examples
• Session file structure documentation
• CLI integration examples