Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/workflows/cli-tools-usage.md

CLI Tools Execution Specification

Table of Contents

1. Configuration Reference
2. Tool Selection
3. Prompt Template
4. CLI Execution
5. Execution Configuration
6. Best Practices

---

Configuration Reference

Configuration File

Path: .claude/cli-tools.json

All tool availability, model selection, and routing are defined in this configuration file.

Configuration Fields

Field	Description
enabled	Tool availability status
primaryModel	Default model for the tool
secondaryModel	Fallback model
tags	Capability tags for routing

Tool Types

Type	Usage	Capabilities
builtin	--tool gemini	Full (analysis + write tools)
cli-wrapper	--tool doubao	Full (analysis + write tools)
api-endpoint	--tool g25	Analysis only (no file write tools)

Note

: api-endpoint tools only support analysis and code generation responses. They cannot create, modify, or delete files.

---

Tool Selection

Tag-Based Routing

Tools are selected based on tags defined in the configuration. Use tags to match task requirements to tool capabilities.

Common Tags

Tag	Use Case
analysis	Code review, architecture analysis, exploration
implementation	Feature development, bug fixes
documentation	Doc generation, comments
testing	Test creation, coverage analysis
refactoring	Code restructuring
security	Security audits, vulnerability scanning

Selection Algorithm

1. Parse task intent → extract required capabilities
2. Load cli-tools.json → get enabled tools with tags
3. Match tags → filter tools supporting required capabilities
4. Select tool → choose by priority (explicit > tag-match > default)
5. Select model → use primaryModel, fallback to secondaryModel

Selection Decision Tree

┌─ Explicit --tool specified?
│  └─→ YES: Use specified tool (validate enabled)
│
└─ NO: Tag-based selection
   ├─ Task requires tags?
   │  └─→ Match tools with matching tags
   │     └─→ Multiple matches? Use first enabled
   │
   └─ No tag match?
      └─→ Use default tool (first enabled in config)

Command Structure

# Explicit tool selection
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool <tool-id> --mode <analysis|write|review>

# Model override
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool <tool-id> --model <model-id> --mode <analysis|write>

# Code review (codex only)
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool codex --mode review

# Tag-based auto-selection (future)
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tags <tag1,tag2> --mode <analysis|write>

Tool Fallback Chain

When primary tool fails or is unavailable:

1. Check secondaryModel for same tool
2. Try next enabled tool with matching tags
3. Fall back to default enabled tool

---

Prompt Template

Universal Prompt Template

# Use --rule to auto-load protocol and template as $PROTO and $TMPL
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: [what] + [why] + [success criteria] + [constraints/scope]
TASK: • [step 1: specific action] • [step 2: specific action] • [step 3: specific action]
MODE: [analysis|write]
CONTEXT: @[file patterns] | Memory: [session/tech/module context]
EXPECTED: [deliverable format] + [quality criteria] + [structure requirements]
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | [domain constraints]
" --tool <tool-id> --mode <analysis|write> --rule <category-template>

Intent Capture Checklist (Before CLI Execution)

⚠️ CRITICAL: Before executing any CLI command, verify these intent dimensions:

Intent Validation Questions:

• Is the objective specific and measurable?
• Are success criteria defined?
• Is the scope clearly bounded?
• Are constraints and limitations stated?
• Is the expected output format clear?
• Is the action level (read/write) explicit?

Template Structure

Every command MUST include these fields:

• PURPOSE

  • Purpose: Goal + motivation + success
  • Components: What + Why + Success Criteria + Constraints
  • Bad Example: "Analyze code"
  • Good Example: "Identify security vulnerabilities in auth module to pass compliance audit; success = all OWASP Top 10 addressed; scope = src/auth/** only"

• TASK

  • Purpose: Actionable steps
  • Components: Specific verbs + targets
  • Bad Example: "• Review code • Find issues"
  • Good Example: "• Scan for SQL injection in query builders • Check XSS in template rendering • Verify CSRF token validation"

• MODE

  • Purpose: Permission level
  • Components: analysis / write / auto
  • Bad Example: (missing)
  • Good Example: "analysis" or "write"

• CONTEXT

  • Purpose: File scope + history
  • Components: File patterns + Memory
  • Bad Example: "@**/*"
  • Good Example: "@src/auth/**/*.ts @shared/utils/security.ts | Memory: Previous auth refactoring (WFS-001)"

• EXPECTED

  • Purpose: Output specification
  • Components: Format + Quality + Structure
  • Bad Example: "Report"
  • Good Example: "Markdown report with: severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, remediation code snippets, priority ranking"

• RULES

  • Purpose: Protocol + template + constraints
  • Components: $PROTO + $TMPL + domain rules (variables loaded beforehand)
  • Bad Example: (missing)
  • Good Example: "$PROTO $TMPL | Focus on authentication | Ignore test files" (where PROTO and TMPL are pre-loaded variables)

CONTEXT Configuration

Format: CONTEXT: [file patterns] | Memory: [memory context]

File Patterns

• @**/*: All files (default)
• @src/**/*.ts: TypeScript in src
• @../shared/**/*: Sibling directory (requires --includeDirs)
• @CLAUDE.md: Specific file

Memory Context

Include when building on previous work:

# Cross-task reference
Memory: Building on auth refactoring (commit abc123), implementing refresh tokens

# Cross-module integration
Memory: Integration with auth module, using shared error patterns from @shared/utils/errors.ts

Memory Sources:

• Related Tasks: Previous refactoring, extensions, conflict resolution
• Tech Stack Patterns: Framework conventions, security guidelines
• Cross-Module References: Integration points, shared utilities, type dependencies

Pattern Discovery Workflow

For complex requirements, discover files BEFORE CLI execution:

# Step 1: Discover files
rg "export.*Component" --files-with-matches --type ts

# Step 2: Build CONTEXT
CONTEXT: @components/Auth.tsx @types/auth.d.ts | Memory: Previous type refactoring

# Step 3: Execute CLI
ccw cli -p "..." --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --cd src

RULES Configuration

使用 --rule 选项自动加载模板：

ccw cli -p "... RULES: \$PROTO \$TMPL | constraints" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-architecture

--rule 工作原理：

1. 自动从 ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/ 发现模板
2. 根据 --mode 自动加载对应 protocol（analysis-protocol.md 或 write-protocol.md）
3. 设置环境变量 $PROTO（protocol）和 $TMPL（template）供子进程使用
4. 在提示词中用 $PROTO 和 $TMPL 引用

模板选择：从 Task-Template Matrix 选择或使用通用模板：

• universal-rigorous-style - 精确型任务
• universal-creative-style - 探索型任务

Mode Protocol References

--rule 自动处理 Protocol：

• --mode analysis → $PROTO = analysis-protocol.md
• --mode write → $PROTO = write-protocol.md

Protocol 映射：

• analysis 模式

  • 权限：只读操作
  • 约束：禁止文件创建/修改/删除

• write 模式

  • 权限：创建/修改/删除文件
  • 约束：完整工作流执行能力

Template System

Base Path: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/

Naming Convention: category-function.txt

• 第一段为分类（analysis, development, planning 等）
• 第二段为功能描述

Universal Templates:

• universal-rigorous-style - 精确型任务
• universal-creative-style - 探索型任务

Task-Template Matrix:

Analysis:

• Execution Tracing: analysis-trace-code-execution
• Bug Diagnosis: analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause
• Code Patterns: analysis-analyze-code-patterns
• Document Analysis: analysis-analyze-technical-document
• Architecture Review: analysis-review-architecture
• Code Review: analysis-review-code-quality
• Performance: analysis-analyze-performance
• Security: analysis-assess-security-risks

Planning:

• Architecture: planning-plan-architecture-design
• Task Breakdown: planning-breakdown-task-steps
• Component Design: planning-design-component-spec
• Migration: planning-plan-migration-strategy

Development:

• Feature: development-implement-feature
• Refactoring: development-refactor-codebase
• Tests: development-generate-tests
• UI Component: development-implement-component-ui
• Debugging: development-debug-runtime-issues

---

CLI Execution

MODE Options

• analysis

  • Permission: Read-only
  • Use For: Code review, architecture analysis, pattern discovery, exploration
  • Specification: Safe for all tools

• write

  • Permission: Create/Modify/Delete
  • Use For: Feature implementation, bug fixes, documentation, code creation, file modifications
  • Specification: Requires explicit --mode write

• review

  • Permission: Read-only (code review output)
  • Use For: Git-aware code review of uncommitted changes, branch diffs, specific commits
  • Specification: codex only - uses codex review subcommand with --uncommitted by default
  • Tool Behavior:
    • codex: Executes codex review --uncommitted [prompt] for structured code review
    • Other tools (gemini/qwen/claude): Accept mode but no operation change (treated as analysis)

Command Options

• --tool <tool>

  • Description: Tool from config (e.g., gemini, qwen, codex)
  • Default: First enabled tool in config

• --mode <mode>

  • Description: REQUIRED: analysis, write, review
  • Default: NONE (must specify)
  • Note: review mode triggers codex review subcommand for codex tool only

• --model <model>

  • Description: Model override
  • Default: Tool's primaryModel from config

• --cd <path>

  • Description: Working directory
  • Default: current

• --includeDirs <dirs>

  • Description: Additional directories (comma-separated)
  • Default: none

• --resume [id]

  • Description: Resume previous session
  • Default: -

• --rule <template>

  • Description: 模板名称，自动加载 protocol + template 为 $PROTO 和 $TMPL 环境变量
  • Default: none
  • 根据 --mode 自动选择 protocol

Directory Configuration

Working Directory (--cd)

When using --cd:

• @**/* = Files within working directory tree only
• CANNOT reference parent/sibling via @ alone
• Must use --includeDirs for external directories

Include Directories (--includeDirs)

TWO-STEP requirement for external files:

1. Add --includeDirs parameter
2. Reference in CONTEXT with @ patterns

# Single directory
ccw cli -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared

# Multiple directories
ccw cli -p "..." --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared,../types,../utils

Rule: If CONTEXT contains @../dir/**/*, MUST include --includeDirs ../dir

Benefits: Excludes unrelated directories, reduces token usage

Session Resume

When to Use:

• Multi-round planning (analysis → planning → implementation)
• Multi-model collaboration (tool A → tool B on same topic)
• Topic continuity (building on previous findings)

Usage:

ccw cli -p "Continue analyzing" --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --resume              # Resume last
ccw cli -p "Fix issues found" --tool <tool-id> --mode write --resume <id>              # Resume specific
ccw cli -p "Merge findings" --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --resume <id1>,<id2>      # Merge multiple

• --resume: Last session
• --resume <id>: Specific session
• --resume <id1>,<id2>: Merge sessions (comma-separated)

Context Assembly (automatic):

=== PREVIOUS CONVERSATION ===
USER PROMPT: [Previous prompt]
ASSISTANT RESPONSE: [Previous output]
=== CONTINUATION ===
[Your new prompt]

Command Examples

Task-Type Specific Templates

Analysis Task (Security Audit):

ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Identify OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in authentication module to pass security audit; success = all critical/high issues documented with remediation
TASK: • Scan for injection flaws (SQL, command, LDAP) • Check authentication bypass vectors • Evaluate session management • Assess sensitive data exposure
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @src/auth/**/* @src/middleware/auth.ts | Memory: Using bcrypt for passwords, JWT for sessions
EXPECTED: Security report with: severity matrix, file:line references, CVE mappings where applicable, remediation code snippets prioritized by risk
RULES: \$PROTO \$TMPL | Focus on authentication | Ignore test files
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-assess-security-risks --cd src/auth

Implementation Task (New Feature):

ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Implement rate limiting for API endpoints to prevent abuse; must be configurable per-endpoint; backward compatible with existing clients
TASK: • Create rate limiter middleware with sliding window • Implement per-route configuration • Add Redis backend for distributed state • Include bypass for internal services
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @src/middleware/**/* @src/config/**/* | Memory: Using Express.js, Redis already configured, existing middleware pattern in auth.ts
EXPECTED: Production-ready code with: TypeScript types, unit tests, integration test, configuration example, migration guide
RULES: \$PROTO \$TMPL | Follow existing middleware patterns | No breaking changes
" --tool gemini --mode write --rule development-implement-feature

Bug Fix Task:

ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Fix memory leak in WebSocket connection handler causing server OOM after 24h; root cause must be identified before any fix
TASK: • Trace connection lifecycle from open to close • Identify event listener accumulation • Check cleanup on disconnect • Verify garbage collection eligibility
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @src/websocket/**/* @src/services/connection-manager.ts | Memory: Using ws library, ~5000 concurrent connections in production
EXPECTED: Root cause analysis with: memory profile, leak source (file:line), fix recommendation with code, verification steps
RULES: \$PROTO \$TMPL | Focus on resource cleanup
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause --cd src

Refactoring Task:

ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Refactor payment processing to use strategy pattern for multi-gateway support; no functional changes; all existing tests must pass
TASK: • Extract gateway interface from current implementation • Create strategy classes for Stripe, PayPal • Implement factory for gateway selection • Migrate existing code to use strategies
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @src/payments/**/* @src/types/payment.ts | Memory: Currently only Stripe, adding PayPal next sprint, must support future gateways
EXPECTED: Refactored code with: strategy interface, concrete implementations, factory class, updated tests, migration checklist
RULES: \$PROTO \$TMPL | Preserve all existing behavior | Tests must pass
" --tool gemini --mode write --rule development-refactor-codebase

Code Review Task (codex review mode):

# Review uncommitted changes (default)
ccw cli -p "Focus on security vulnerabilities and error handling" --tool codex --mode review

# Review with custom instructions
ccw cli -p "Check for breaking changes in API contracts and backward compatibility" --tool codex --mode review

Note

: --mode review only triggers special behavior for codex tool (uses codex review --uncommitted). Other tools accept the mode but execute as standard analysis.

---

Permission Framework

Single-Use Authorization: Each execution requires explicit user instruction. Previous authorization does NOT carry over.

Mode Hierarchy:

• analysis: Read-only, safe for auto-execution
• write: Create/Modify/Delete files, full operations - requires explicit --mode write
• review: Git-aware code review (codex only), read-only output - requires explicit --mode review
• Exception: User provides clear instructions like "modify", "create", "implement"

---

Best Practices

Core Principles

• Configuration-driven - All tool selection from cli-tools.json
• Tag-based routing - Match task requirements to tool capabilities
• Use tools early and often - Tools are faster and more thorough
• Unified CLI - Always use ccw cli -p for consistent parameter handling
• Default mode is analysis - Omit --mode for read-only operations, explicitly use --mode write for file modifications
• Use --rule for templates - 自动加载 protocol + template 为 $PROTO 和 $TMPL 环境变量
• Write protection - Require EXPLICIT --mode write for file operations

Workflow Principles

• Use CCW unified interface for all executions
• Always include template - 使用 --rule <template-name> 加载模板
• Be specific - Clear PURPOSE, TASK, EXPECTED fields
• Include constraints - File patterns, scope in RULES
• Leverage memory context when building on previous work
• Discover patterns first - Use rg/MCP before CLI execution
• Default to full context - Use @**/* unless specific files needed

Planning Checklist

• Purpose defined - Clear goal and intent
• Mode selected - --mode analysis|write|review
• Context gathered - File references + memory (default @**/*)
• Directory navigation - --cd and/or --includeDirs
• Tool selected - Explicit --tool or tag-based auto-selection
• Rule template - --rule <template-name> 自动加载 protocol + template
• Constraints specified - Scope, requirements

Execution Workflow

1. Load configuration - Read cli-tools.json for available tools
2. Match by tags - Select tool based on task requirements
3. Validate enabled - Ensure selected tool is enabled
4. Execute with mode - Always specify --mode analysis|write|review
5. Fallback gracefully - Use secondary model or next matching tool on failure