Convert requirements-clarity to plugin format with English prompts

Changes:
- Migrate from .claude/skills/ to .claude/plugins/ structure
- Add claude.json plugin metadata
- Create instructions.md with all English prompts (no Chinese)
- Update README.md for plugin distribution
- Update .gitignore to allow .claude/plugins/

Plugin structure:
- claude.json: Plugin metadata (name, version, components)
- instructions.md: Main skill prompt (100% English)
- README.md: Plugin documentation and usage guide

Maintains all functionality:
- 100-point scoring system
- Iterative clarification (≥90 threshold)
- PRD generation with 4 sections
- Auto-activation on vague requirements

Fixes #17

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
swe-agent[bot]
2025-10-21 01:06:53 +00:00
parent 4110ee4600
commit 4d3789d0dc
4 changed files with 72 additions and 74 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
# Requirements Clarity Plugin
## Overview
This Claude Code plugin automatically detects vague requirements and transforms them into crystal-clear Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) through systematic clarification.
**Plugin vs Skill vs Command**:
- **Plugin**: Distributable package with metadata (`claude.json`)
- **Skill**: Auto-activated behavior (part of plugin)
- **Command**: Manual invocation (deprecated in favor of plugin)
## Installation
```bash
/plugin install requirements-clarity
```
Or add to your `.clauderc`:
```json
{
"plugins": {
"requirements-clarity": {
"enabled": true
}
}
}
```
## How It Works
### Automatic Activation
The plugin activates when Claude detects:
1. **Vague Feature Requests**
```
User: "add login feature"
User: "implement payment system"
User: "create user dashboard"
```
2. **Missing Technical Details**
- No technology stack mentioned
- No architecture or constraints specified
- No integration points identified
3. **Incomplete Specifications**
- No acceptance criteria
- No success metrics
- No edge cases or error handling
4. **Ambiguous Scope**
- Unclear boundaries ("user management" - what exactly?)
- No distinction between MVP and future features
### Clarification Process
```
User: "I want to implement a user login feature"
Claude detects vague requirement
Auto-activates requirements-clarity skill
Initial assessment: 35/100 clarity score
Round 1: Ask 2-3 targeted questions
User responds
Score update: 35 → 72
Round 2: Continue clarifying gaps
User responds
Score update: 72 → 93 ✓ (≥90 threshold)
Generate PRD files:
- ./.claude/specs/user-login/prd.md
- ./.claude/specs/user-login/clarification-log.md
```
## Scoring System (100 points)
| Dimension | Points | Criteria |
|-----------|--------|----------|
| **Functional Clarity** | 30 | Clear inputs/outputs (10), User interaction (10), Success criteria (10) |
| **Technical Specificity** | 25 | Tech stack (8), Integration points (8), Constraints (9) |
| **Implementation Completeness** | 25 | Edge cases (8), Error handling (9), Data validation (8) |
| **Business Context** | 20 | Problem statement (7), Target users (7), Success metrics (6) |
**Threshold**: ≥ 90 points required before PRD generation
## Output Structure
### 1. Clarification Log
`./.claude/specs/{feature-name}/clarification-log.md`
Documents the entire clarification conversation:
- Original requirement
- Each round of questions and answers
- Score progression
- Final assessment breakdown
### 2. Product Requirements Document
`./.claude/specs/{feature-name}/prd.md`
Structured PRD with four main sections:
#### Requirements Description
- Background: Business problem, target users, value proposition
- Feature Overview: Core functionality, boundaries, user scenarios
- Detailed Requirements: Inputs/outputs, interactions, data, edge cases
#### Design Decisions
- Technical Approach: Architecture, components, data storage, APIs
- Constraints: Performance, compatibility, security, scalability
- Risk Assessment: Technical, dependency, timeline risks
#### Acceptance Criteria
- Functional: Checklistable feature requirements
- Quality Standards: Code quality, testing, performance, security
- User Acceptance: UX, documentation, training
#### Execution Phases
- Phase 1: Preparation - Environment setup
- Phase 2: Core Development - Core implementation
- Phase 3: Integration & Testing - QA
- Phase 4: Deployment - Release
## Testing Guide
### Test Case 1: Vague Login Feature
**Input**:
```
"I want to implement a user login feature"
```
**Expected Behavior**:
1. Claude detects vague requirement
2. Announces activation of requirements-clarity skill
3. Shows initial score (~30-40/100)
4. Asks 2-3 questions about:
- Login method (username+password, phone+OTP, OAuth?)
- Functional scope (remember me, forgot password?)
- Technology stack (backend language, database, auth method?)
**Expected Output**:
- Score improves to ~70+ after round 1
- Additional questions about security, error handling, performance
- Final score ≥ 90
- PRD generated in `./.claude/specs/user-login/`
### Test Case 2: Ambiguous E-commerce Feature
**Input**:
```
"add shopping cart to the website"
```
**Expected Behavior**:
1. Auto-activation (no tech stack, no UX details, no constraints)
2. Questions about:
- Cart behavior (guest checkout? save for later? quantity limits?)
- User experience (inline cart vs dedicated page?)
- Backend integration (existing inventory system? payment gateway?)
- Data persistence (session storage, database, local storage?)
**Expected Output**:
- Iterative clarification (2-3 rounds)
- Score progression: ~25 → ~65 → ~92
- PRD with concrete shopping cart specifications
### Test Case 3: Technical Implementation Request
**Input**:
```
"Refactor the authentication service to use JWT tokens"
```
**Expected Behavior**:
1. May NOT activate (already fairly specific)
2. If activates, asks about:
- Token expiration strategy
- Refresh token implementation
- Migration plan from existing auth
- Backward compatibility requirements
### Test Case 4: Clear Requirement (Should NOT Activate)
**Input**:
```
"Fix the null pointer exception in auth.go line 45 by adding a nil check before accessing user.Email"
```
**Expected Behavior**:
- Skill does NOT activate (requirement is already clear)
- Claude proceeds directly to implementation
## Benefits
1. **Proactive Quality Gate**: Prevents unclear specs from proceeding to implementation
2. **Zero Friction**: Users describe features naturally, no command syntax needed
3. **Context Awareness**: Claude recognizes ambiguity patterns automatically
4. **Persistent Mode**: Stays active throughout clarification conversation
5. **Better UX**: Natural conversation flow vs explicit command invocation
## Configuration
No configuration needed - the plugin is automatically discovered by Claude Code when installed.
**Plugin Metadata** (in claude.json):
```json
{
"name": "requirements-clarity",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Automatically clarify vague requirements into actionable PRDs",
"components": {
"skills": ["requirements-clarity"]
}
}
```
## Troubleshooting
### Plugin Not Activating
**Problem**: Claude doesn't enter clarification mode for vague requirements
**Solutions**:
1. Verify plugin is installed: `/plugin list`
2. Check plugin is enabled in `.clauderc`
3. Ensure `instructions.md` exists in plugin directory
4. Try more explicit vague requirement: "add user feature"
### Premature PRD Generation
**Problem**: PRD generated before score reaches 90
**Solution**: This is a bug - instructions.md explicitly requires ≥90 threshold. Review the clarification log to see actual score.
### Over-Clarification
**Problem**: Claude asks too many questions for simple features
**Expected**: This is by design - better to over-clarify than under-specify. If the requirement is truly simple, answer questions quickly to reach 90+ score faster.
## Examples
### Example 1: Login Feature (Full Flow)
See full example in instructions.md under "Example Clarification Flow"
**Summary**:
- Input: "I want to implement a user login feature"
- Round 1: Login method, scope, tech stack → Score 35→72
- Round 2: Security, error handling, performance → Score 72→93
- Output: Complete PRD with bcrypt, JWT, PostgreSQL, Go backend
### Example 2: API Endpoint
**Input**: "create an API to get user profile"
**Round 1** (Score: 28/100):
```
Q1: What information should the API return? (name, email, avatar, preferences?)
Q2: Authentication required? (JWT, session, API key?)
Q3: Response format? (JSON, XML?) Any pagination?
```
**Round 2** (Score: 75/100):
```
Q1: Error handling: What if user not found? (404, custom error?)
Q2: Performance: Caching strategy? Expected QPS?
Q3: Privacy: Any fields that should be filtered based on requester?
```
**Round 3** (Score: 91/100):
```
PRD Generated:
- Endpoint: GET /api/v1/users/:id
- Auth: JWT required
- Response: JSON with name, email, avatar, bio
- Caching: Redis, 5min TTL
- Rate limit: 100 req/min per user
```
## References
- **Claude Code Plugins Documentation**: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/plugins
- **Original `/clarif` Command**: `development-essentials/commands/clarif.md`
- **Original Clarification Agent**: `development-essentials/agents/clarif-agent.md`
## Changelog
### v1.0.0 (2025-10-21)
- Converted skill to plugin format
- Added `claude.json` plugin metadata
- Translated all prompts to English (was mixed Chinese/English)
- Updated documentation for plugin distribution
- Maintained 100-point scoring system and PRD structure
- Compatible with Claude Code plugin system
---
**License**: MIT
**Author**: stellarlink
**Homepage**: https://github.com/cexll/myclaude