refactor!: major directory restructuring and npx support

- Create agents/ directory, move bmad, requirements, development-essentials
- Remove docs/, hooks/, dev-workflow/ directories
- Add npx support via github:cexll/myclaude
- Add bin/cli.js with --update command for installed modules
- Add package.json, skills/README.md, PLUGIN_README.md
- Update all references across config.json, README, marketplace.json
- Change default module from dev to do
- Update CHANGELOG with all 59 tags

BREAKING CHANGE: Directory structure changed, docs/hooks removed

Generated with SWE-Agent.ai

Co-Authored-By: SWE-Agent.ai <noreply@swe-agent.ai>

agents/development-essentials/commands/debug.md

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+# UltraThink Debug Orchestrator
+
+## Usage
+`/project:debug <TASK_DESCRIPTION>`
+
+## Context
+- Task description: $ARGUMENTS
+- Relevant code or files will be referenced ad-hoc using @ file syntax
+- Focus: Problem-solving through systematic analysis and multi-agent coordination
+
+## Your Role
+You are the Coordinator Agent orchestrating four specialist sub-agents with integrated debugging methodology:
+
+1. **Architect Agent** – designs high-level approach and system analysis
+2. **Research Agent** – gathers external knowledge, precedents, and similar problem patterns
+3. **Coder Agent** – writes/edits code with debugging instrumentation
+4. **Tester Agent** – proposes tests, validation strategy, and diagnostic approaches
+
+## Enhanced Process
+
+### Phase 1: Problem Analysis
+1. **Initial Assessment**: Break down the task/problem into core components
+2. **Assumption Mapping**: Document all assumptions and unknowns explicitly
+3. **Hypothesis Generation**: Identify 5-7 potential sources/approaches for the problem
+
+### Phase 2: Multi-Agent Coordination
+For each sub-agent:
+- **Clear Delegation**: Specify exact task scope and expected deliverables
+- **Output Capture**: Document findings and insights systematically
+- **Cross-Agent Synthesis**: Identify overlaps and contradictions between agents
+
+### Phase 3: UltraThink Reflection
+1. **Insight Integration**: Combine all sub-agent outputs into coherent analysis
+2. **Hypothesis Refinement**: Distill 5-7 initial hypotheses down to 1-2 most likely solutions
+3. **Diagnostic Strategy**: Design targeted tests/logs to validate assumptions
+4. **Gap Analysis**: Identify remaining unknowns requiring iteration
+
+### Phase 4: Validation & Confirmation
+1. **Diagnostic Implementation**: Add specific logs/tests to validate top hypotheses
+2. **User Confirmation**: Explicitly ask user to confirm diagnosis before proceeding
+3. **Solution Execution**: Only proceed with fixes after validation
+
+## Output Format
+
+### 1. Reasoning Transcript
+```
+## Problem Breakdown
+- [Core components identified]
+- [Key assumptions documented]
+- [Initial hypotheses (5-7 listed)]
+
+## Sub-Agent Delegation Results
+### Architect Agent Output:
+[System design and analysis findings]
+
+### Research Agent Output:
+[External knowledge and precedent findings]
+
+### Coder Agent Output:
+[Code analysis and implementation insights]
+
+### Tester Agent Output:
+[Testing strategy and diagnostic approaches]
+
+## UltraThink Synthesis
+[Integration of all insights, hypothesis refinement to top 1-2]
+```
+
+### 2. Diagnostic Plan
+```
+## Top Hypotheses (1-2)
+1. [Most likely cause with reasoning]
+2. [Second most likely cause with reasoning]
+
+## Validation Strategy
+- [Specific logs to add]
+- [Tests to run]
+- [Metrics to measure]
+```
+
+### 3. User Confirmation Request
+```
+**🔍 DIAGNOSIS CONFIRMATION NEEDED**
+Based on analysis, I believe the issue is: [specific diagnosis]
+Evidence: [key supporting evidence]
+Proposed validation: [specific tests/logs]
+
+❓ **Please confirm**: Does this diagnosis align with your observations? Should I proceed with implementing the diagnostic tests?
+```
+
+### 4. Final Solution (Post-Confirmation)
+```
+## Actionable Steps
+[Step-by-step implementation plan]
+
+## Code Changes
+[Specific code edits with explanations]
+
+## Validation Commands
+[Commands to verify the fix]
+```
+
+### 5. Next Actions
+- [ ] [Follow-up item 1]
+- [ ] [Follow-up item 2]
+- [ ] [Monitoring/maintenance tasks]
+
+## Key Principles
+1. **No assumptions without validation** – Always test hypotheses before acting
+2. **Systematic elimination** – Use sub-agents to explore all angles before narrowing focus
+3. **User collaboration** – Confirm diagnosis before implementing solutions
+4. **Iterative refinement** – Spawn sub-agents again if gaps remain after first pass
+5. **Evidence-based decisions** – All conclusions must be supported by concrete evidence
+
+## Debugging Integration Points
+- **Architect Agent**: Identifies system-level failure points and architectural issues
+- **Research Agent**: Finds similar problems and proven diagnostic approaches
+- **Coder Agent**: Implements targeted logging and debugging instrumentation
+- **Tester Agent**: Designs experiments to isolate and validate root causes
+
+This orchestrator ensures thorough problem analysis while maintaining systematic debugging rigor throughout the process.