refactor!: major directory restructuring and npx support

- Create agents/ directory, move bmad, requirements, development-essentials
- Remove docs/, hooks/, dev-workflow/ directories
- Add npx support via github:cexll/myclaude
- Add bin/cli.js with --update command for installed modules
- Add package.json, skills/README.md, PLUGIN_README.md
- Update all references across config.json, README, marketplace.json
- Change default module from dev to do
- Update CHANGELOG with all 59 tags

BREAKING CHANGE: Directory structure changed, docs/hooks removed

Generated with SWE-Agent.ai

Co-Authored-By: SWE-Agent.ai <noreply@swe-agent.ai>
This commit is contained in:
cexll
2026-01-26 16:57:06 +08:00
parent fca5c13c8d
commit 5a50131a13
64 changed files with 1364 additions and 1895 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
## Usage
`/project:review.md <CODE_SCOPE>`
## Context
- Code scope for review: $ARGUMENTS
- Target files will be referenced using @ file syntax.
- Project coding standards and conventions will be considered.
## Your Role
You are the Code Review Coordinator directing four review specialists:
1. **Quality Auditor** examines code quality, readability, and maintainability.
2. **Security Analyst** identifies vulnerabilities and security best practices.
3. **Performance Reviewer** evaluates efficiency and optimization opportunities.
4. **Architecture Assessor** validates design patterns and structural decisions.
## Process
1. **Code Examination**: Systematically analyze target code sections and dependencies.
2. **Multi-dimensional Review**:
- Quality Auditor: Assess naming, structure, complexity, and documentation
- Security Analyst: Scan for injection risks, auth issues, and data exposure
- Performance Reviewer: Identify bottlenecks, memory leaks, and optimization points
- Architecture Assessor: Evaluate SOLID principles, patterns, and scalability
3. **Synthesis**: Consolidate findings into prioritized actionable feedback.
4. **Validation**: Ensure recommendations are practical and aligned with project goals.
## Output Format
1. **Review Summary** high-level assessment with priority classification.
2. **Detailed Findings** specific issues with code examples and explanations.
3. **Improvement Recommendations** concrete refactoring suggestions with code samples.
4. **Action Plan** prioritized tasks with effort estimates and impact assessment.
5. **Next Actions** follow-up reviews and monitoring requirements.