# /dev - Minimal Dev Workflow ## Overview A freshly designed lightweight development workflow with no legacy baggage, focused on delivering high-quality code fast. ## Flow ``` /dev trigger ↓ AskUserQuestion (requirements clarification) ↓ Codex analysis (extract key points and tasks) ↓ develop-doc-generator (create dev doc) ↓ Codex concurrent development (2–5 tasks) ↓ Codex testing & verification (≥90% coverage) ↓ Done (generate summary) ``` ## The 6 Steps ### 1. Clarify Requirements - Use **AskUserQuestion** to ask the user directly - No scoring system, no complex logic - 2–3 rounds of Q&A until the requirement is clear ### 2. Codex Analysis - Call codex to analyze the request - Extract: core functions, technical points, task list (2–5 items) - Output a structured analysis ### 3. Generate Dev Doc - Call the **develop-doc-generator** agent - Produce a single `dev-plan.md` - Include: task breakdown, file scope, dependencies, test commands ### 4. Concurrent Development - Work from the task list in dev-plan.md - Independent tasks → run in parallel - Conflicting tasks → run serially ### 5. Testing & Verification - Each codex task: - Implements the feature - Writes tests - Runs coverage - Reports results (≥90%) ### 6. Complete - Summarize task status - Record coverage ## Usage ```bash /dev "Implement user login with email + password" ``` **No options**, fixed workflow, works out of the box. ## Output Structure ``` .claude/specs/{feature_name}/ └── dev-plan.md # Dev document generated by agent ``` Only one file—minimal and clear. ## Core Components ### Tools - **AskUserQuestion**: interactive requirement clarification - **codex**: analysis, development, testing - **develop-doc-generator**: generate dev doc (subagent, saves context) ## Key Features ### ✅ Fresh Design - No legacy project residue - No complex scoring logic - No extra abstraction layers ### ✅ Minimal Orchestration - Orchestrator controls the flow directly - Only three tools/components - Steps are straightforward ### ✅ Concurrency - 2–5 tasks in parallel - Auto-detect dependencies and conflicts - Codex executes independently ### ✅ Quality Assurance - Enforces 90% coverage - Codex tests and verifies its own work - Automatic retry on failure ## Example ```bash # Trigger /dev "Add user login feature" # Step 1: Clarify requirements Q: What login methods are supported? A: Email + password Q: Should login be remembered? A: Yes, use JWT token # Step 2: Codex analysis Output: - Core: email/password login + JWT auth - Task 1: Backend API - Task 2: Password hashing - Task 3: Frontend form # Step 3: Generate doc dev-plan.md generated ✓ # Step 4-5: Concurrent development [task-1] Backend API → tests → 92% ✓ [task-2] Password hashing → tests → 95% ✓ [task-3] Frontend form → tests → 91% ✓ ``` ## Directory Structure ``` dev-workflow/ ├── README.md # This doc ├── commands/ │ └── dev.md # Workflow definition └── agents/ └── develop-doc-generator.md # Doc generator ``` Minimal structure, only three files. ## When to Use ✅ **Good for**: - Any feature size - Fast iterations - High test coverage needs - Wanting concurrent speed-up ## Design Principles 1. **KISS**: keep it simple 2. **Disposable**: no persistent config 3. **Quality first**: enforce 90% coverage 4. **Concurrency first**: leverage codex 5. **No legacy baggage**: clean-slate design --- **Philosophy**: zero tolerance for complexity—ship the smallest usable solution, like Linus would.