refactor: enhance documentation on Minimum Execution Units and command grouping in CCW

This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-01-24 14:27:58 +08:00
parent 38e1cdc737
commit 2dcd1637f0
2 changed files with 294 additions and 90 deletions

View File

@@ -11,6 +11,75 @@ Interactive orchestration tool: analyze task → discover commands → recommend
**Execution Model**: Pseudocode guidance. Claude intelligently executes each phase based on context.
## Core Concept: Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
### What is a Minimum Execution Unit?
**Definition**: A set of commands that must execute together as an atomic group to achieve a meaningful workflow milestone. Splitting these commands breaks the logical flow and creates incomplete states.
**Why This Matters**:
- **Prevents Incomplete States**: Avoid stopping after task generation without execution
- **User Experience**: User gets complete results, not intermediate artifacts requiring manual follow-up
- **Workflow Integrity**: Maintains logical coherence of multi-step operations
### Minimum Execution Units
**Planning + Execution Units** (规划+执行单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|-----------|----------|---------|--------|
| **Quick Implementation** | lite-plan → lite-execute | Lightweight plan and immediate execution | Working code |
| **Multi-CLI Planning** | multi-cli-plan → lite-execute | Multi-perspective analysis and execution | Working code |
| **Bug Fix** | lite-fix → lite-execute | Quick bug diagnosis and fix execution | Fixed code |
| **Full Planning + Execution** | plan → execute | Detailed planning and execution | Working code |
| **Verified Planning + Execution** | plan → plan-verify → execute | Planning with verification and execution | Working code |
| **Replanning + Execution** | replan → execute | Update plan and execute changes | Working code |
| **TDD Planning + Execution** | tdd-plan → execute | Test-driven development planning and execution | Working code |
| **Test Generation + Execution** | test-gen → execute | Generate test suite and execute | Generated tests |
**Testing Units** (测试单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|-----------|----------|---------|--------|
| **Test Validation** | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute | Generate test tasks and execute test-fix cycle | Tests passed |
**Review Units** (审查单元):
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|-----------|----------|---------|--------|
| **Code Review (Session)** | review-session-cycle → review-fix | Complete review cycle and apply fixes | Fixed code |
| **Code Review (Module)** | review-module-cycle → review-fix | Module review cycle and apply fixes | Fixed code |
### Command-to-Unit Mapping (命令与最小单元的映射)
| Command | Can Precede | Atomic Units |
|---------|-----------|--------------|
| lite-plan | lite-execute | Quick Implementation |
| multi-cli-plan | lite-execute | Multi-CLI Planning |
| lite-fix | lite-execute | Bug Fix |
| plan | plan-verify, execute | Full Planning + Execution, Verified Planning + Execution |
| plan-verify | execute | Verified Planning + Execution |
| replan | execute | Replanning + Execution |
| test-gen | execute | Test Generation + Execution |
| tdd-plan | execute | TDD Planning + Execution |
| review-session-cycle | review-fix | Code Review (Session) |
| review-module-cycle | review-fix | Code Review (Module) |
| test-fix-gen | test-cycle-execute | Test Validation |
### Atomic Group Rules
1. **Never Split Units**: Coordinator must recommend complete units, not partial chains
2. **Multi-Unit Participation**: Some commands can participate in multiple units (e.g., plan → execute or plan → plan-verify → execute)
3. **User Override**: User can explicitly request partial execution (advanced mode)
4. **Visualization**: Pipeline view shows unit boundaries with `【 】` markers
5. **Validation**: Before execution, verify all unit commands are included
**Example Pipeline with Units**:
```
需求 → 【lite-plan → lite-execute】→ 代码 → 【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过
└──── Quick Implementation ────┘ └────── Test Validation ──────┘
```
## 3-Phase Workflow
### Phase 1: Analyze Requirements
@@ -77,37 +146,71 @@ const commandPorts = {
name: 'lite-plan',
input: ['requirement'], // 输入端口:需求
output: ['plan'], // 输出端口:计划
tags: ['planning']
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_group: 'quick-implementation' // 最小单元:与 lite-execute 绑定
},
'lite-execute': {
name: 'lite-execute',
input: ['plan'], // 输入端口:计划
input: ['plan', 'multi-cli-plan', 'lite-fix'], // 输入端口:可接受多种规划输出
output: ['code'], // 输出端口:代码
tags: ['execution']
tags: ['execution'],
atomic_groups: [ // 可参与多个最小单元
'quick-implementation', // lite-plan → lite-execute
'multi-cli-planning', // multi-cli-plan → lite-execute
'bug-fix' // lite-fix → lite-execute
]
},
'plan': {
name: 'plan',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['detailed-plan'],
tags: ['planning']
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_groups: [ // 可参与多个最小单元
'full-planning-execution', // plan → execute
'verified-planning-execution' // plan → plan-verify → execute
]
},
'plan-verify': {
name: 'plan-verify',
input: ['detailed-plan'],
output: ['verified-plan'],
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_group: 'verified-planning-execution' // 最小单元plan → plan-verify → execute
},
'replan': {
name: 'replan',
input: ['session', 'feedback'], // 输入端口:会话或反馈
output: ['replan'], // 输出端口:更新后的计划(供 execute 执行)
tags: ['planning'],
atomic_group: 'replanning-execution' // 最小单元:与 execute 绑定
},
'execute': {
name: 'execute',
input: ['detailed-plan'], // 从 plan 的输出匹配
input: ['detailed-plan', 'verified-plan', 'replan', 'test-tasks', 'tdd-tasks'], // 可接受多种规划输出
output: ['code'],
tags: ['execution']
tags: ['execution'],
atomic_groups: [ // 可参与多个最小单元
'full-planning-execution', // plan → execute
'verified-planning-execution', // plan → plan-verify → execute
'replanning-execution', // replan → execute
'test-generation-execution', // test-gen → execute
'tdd-planning-execution' // tdd-plan → execute
]
},
'test-cycle-execute': {
name: 'test-cycle-execute',
input: ['code'], // 输入端口:代码
input: ['test-tasks'], // 输入端口:测试任务(需先test-fix-gen生成)
output: ['test-passed'], // 输出端口:测试通过
tags: ['testing']
tags: ['testing'],
atomic_group: 'test-validation', // 最小单元:与 test-fix-gen 绑定
note: '需要先执行test-fix-gen生成测试任务再由此命令执行测试周期'
},
'tdd-plan': {
name: 'tdd-plan',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['tdd-tasks'], // TDD 任务
tags: ['planning', 'tdd']
output: ['tdd-tasks'], // TDD 任务(供 execute 执行)
tags: ['planning', 'tdd'],
atomic_group: 'tdd-planning-execution' // 最小单元:与 execute 绑定
},
'execute': {
name: 'execute',
@@ -124,8 +227,9 @@ const commandPorts = {
'lite-fix': {
name: 'lite-fix',
input: ['bug-report'], // 输入端口bug 报告
output: ['fixed-code'], // 输出端口:修复后的代码
tags: ['bugfix']
output: ['lite-fix'], // 输出端口:修复计划(供 lite-execute 执行)
tags: ['bugfix'],
atomic_group: 'bug-fix' // 最小单元:与 lite-execute 绑定
},
'debug': {
name: 'debug',
@@ -136,14 +240,17 @@ const commandPorts = {
'test-gen': {
name: 'test-gen',
input: ['code', 'session'], // 可接受代码或会话
output: ['tests'],
tags: ['testing']
output: ['test-tasks'], // 输出测试任务(IMPL-001,IMPL-002),供 execute 执行
tags: ['testing'],
atomic_group: 'test-generation-execution' // 最小单元:与 execute 绑定
},
'test-fix-gen': {
name: 'test-fix-gen',
input: ['failing-tests', 'session'],
output: ['test-tasks'],
tags: ['testing']
output: ['test-tasks'], // 输出测试任务,针对特定问题生成测试并在测试中修正
tags: ['testing'],
atomic_group: 'test-validation', // 最小单元:与 test-cycle-execute 绑定
note: '生成测试任务供test-cycle-execute执行'
},
'review': {
name: 'review',
@@ -153,9 +260,10 @@ const commandPorts = {
},
'review-fix': {
name: 'review-fix',
input: ['review-findings'],
input: ['review-findings', 'review-verified'], // Accept output from review-session-cycle or review-module-cycle
output: ['fixed-code'],
tags: ['review']
tags: ['review'],
atomic_group: 'code-review' // 最小单元:与 review-session-cycle/review-module-cycle 绑定
},
'brainstorm:auto-parallel': {
name: 'brainstorm:auto-parallel',
@@ -166,8 +274,9 @@ const commandPorts = {
'multi-cli-plan': {
name: 'multi-cli-plan',
input: ['requirement'],
output: ['comparison-plan'], // 对比分析计划
tags: ['planning', 'multi-cli']
output: ['multi-cli-plan'], // 对比分析计划(供 lite-execute 执行)
tags: ['planning', 'multi-cli'],
atomic_group: 'multi-cli-planning' // 最小单元:与 lite-execute 绑定
},
'plan-verify': {
name: 'plan-verify',
@@ -179,13 +288,15 @@ const commandPorts = {
name: 'review-session-cycle',
input: ['code', 'session'], // 可接受代码或会话
output: ['review-verified'], // 输出端口:审查通过
tags: ['review']
tags: ['review'],
atomic_group: 'code-review' // 最小单元:与 review-fix 绑定
},
'review-module-cycle': {
name: 'review-module-cycle',
input: ['module-pattern'], // 输入端口:模块模式
output: ['review-verified'], // 输出端口:审查通过
tags: ['review']
tags: ['review'],
atomic_group: 'code-review' // 最小单元:与 review-fix 绑定
}
};
```
@@ -639,13 +750,17 @@ Complexity: simple
Constraints: []
Task Type: feature
Pipeline:
需求 → lite-plan → 计划 → lite-execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Pipeline (with Minimum Execution Units):
需求 →lite-plan → lite-execute→ 代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过
Chain:
# Unit 1: Quick Implementation
1. /workflow:lite-plan --yes "Add API endpoint..."
2. /workflow:lite-execute --yes --in-memory
3. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
# Unit 2: Test Validation
3. /workflow:test-fix-gen --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
4. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-xxx"
```
### Complex Feature with Verification
@@ -656,16 +771,26 @@ Complexity: complex
Constraints: [no breaking changes]
Task Type: feature
Pipeline:
需求 → plan → 详细计划 → plan-verify → 验证计划 → execute → 代码
review-session-cycle → 审查通过 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Pipeline (with Minimum Execution Units):
需求 →plan → plan-verify→ 验证计划 → execute → 代码
review-session-cycle → review-fix】→ 修复代码
→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过
Chain:
# Unit 1: Full Planning (plan + plan-verify)
1. /workflow:plan --yes "Implement OAuth2..."
2. /workflow:plan-verify --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
# Execution phase
3. /workflow:execute --yes --resume-session="WFS-xxx"
# Unit 2: Code Review (review-session-cycle + review-fix)
4. /workflow:review-session-cycle --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
5. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
5. /workflow:review-fix --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
# Unit 3: Test Validation (test-fix-gen + test-cycle-execute)
6. /workflow:test-fix-gen --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
7. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-xxx"
```
### Quick Bug Fix
@@ -677,11 +802,12 @@ Constraints: [urgent]
Task Type: bugfix
Pipeline:
Bug报告 → lite-fix → 修复代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Bug报告 → lite-fix → 修复代码 → test-fix-gen → 测试任务 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Chain:
1. /workflow:lite-fix --yes "Fix login timeout..."
2. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
2. /workflow:test-fix-gen --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
3. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-xxx"
```
### Skip Tests
@@ -757,18 +883,22 @@ Chain:
### Test Generation from Implementation
```
Goal: Generate tests for completed user registration feature
Goal: Generate comprehensive tests for completed user registration feature
Scope: [auth, tests]
Complexity: medium
Constraints: []
Task Type: test-gen
Pipeline:
代码 → test-gen → 测试 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Pipeline (with Minimum Execution Units):
代码/会话test-gen → execute→ 测试通过
Chain:
# Unit: Test Generation (test-gen + execute)
1. /workflow:test-gen --yes "WFS-registration-20250124"
2. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-xxx"
2. /workflow:execute --yes --session="WFS-test-registration"
Note: test-gen creates IMPL-001 (test generation) and IMPL-002 (test execution & fix)
execute runs both tasks - this is a Minimum Execution Unit
```
### Review + Fix Workflow
@@ -779,13 +909,18 @@ Complexity: medium
Constraints: []
Task Type: review
Pipeline:
代码 → review → 审查发现 → review-fix → 修复代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Pipeline (with Minimum Execution Units):
代码 →review-session-cycle → review-fix→ 修复代码
→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】→ 测试通过
Chain:
1. /workflow:review --yes --session="WFS-payment-impl"
# Unit 1: Code Review (review-session-cycle + review-fix)
1. /workflow:review-session-cycle --yes --session="WFS-payment-impl"
2. /workflow:review-fix --yes --session="WFS-payment-impl"
3. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-payment-impl"
# Unit 2: Test Validation (test-fix-gen + test-cycle-execute)
3. /workflow:test-fix-gen --yes --session="WFS-payment-impl"
4. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-payment-impl"
```
### Brainstorm Workflow (Uncertain Requirements)
@@ -798,14 +933,15 @@ Task Type: brainstorm
Pipeline:
探索主题 → brainstorm:auto-parallel → 分析结果 → plan → 详细计划
→ plan-verify → 验证计划 → execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
→ plan-verify → 验证计划 → execute → 代码 → test-fix-gen → 测试任务 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Chain:
1. /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel --yes "Explore solutions for real-time..."
2. /workflow:plan --yes "Implement chosen notification approach..."
3. /workflow:plan-verify --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
4. /workflow:execute --yes --resume-session="WFS-xxx"
5. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
5. /workflow:test-fix-gen --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
6. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-xxx"
```
### Multi-CLI Plan (Multi-Perspective Analysis)
@@ -817,12 +953,13 @@ Constraints: []
Task Type: multi-cli
Pipeline:
需求 → multi-cli-plan → 对比计划 → lite-execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
需求 → multi-cli-plan → 对比计划 → lite-execute → 代码 → test-fix-gen → 测试任务 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过
Chain:
1. /workflow:multi-cli-plan --yes "Compare microservices vs monolith..."
2. /workflow:lite-execute --yes --in-memory
3. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
3. /workflow:test-fix-gen --yes --session="WFS-xxx"
4. /workflow:test-cycle-execute --yes --session="WFS-test-xxx"
```
## Execution Flow
@@ -886,18 +1023,32 @@ All from `~/.claude/commands/workflow/`:
**Tools**: context-gather, test-context-gather, task-generate, conflict-resolution, action-plan-verify
**Utility**: clean, init, replan
### Testing Commands Distinction
| Command | Purpose | Output | Follow-up |
|---------|---------|--------|-----------|
| **test-gen** | 广泛测试示例生成并进行测试 | test-tasks (IMPL-001, IMPL-002) | `/workflow:execute` |
| **test-fix-gen** | 针对特定问题生成测试并在测试中修正 | test-tasks | `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` |
| **test-cycle-execute** | 执行测试周期(迭代测试和修复) | test-passed | N/A (终点) |
**流程说明**:
- **test-gen → execute**: 生成全面的测试套件execute 执行生成和测试
- **test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute**: 针对特定问题生成修复任务test-cycle-execute 迭代测试和修复直到通过
### Task Type Routing (Pipeline View)
**Note**: `【 】` marks Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元) - these commands must execute together.
| Task Type | Pipeline |
|-----------|----------|
| **feature** (simple) | 需求 → lite-plan → 计划 → lite-execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **feature** (complex) | 需求 → plan → 详细计划 → plan-verify → 验证计划 → execute → 代码 → review-session-cycle → 审查通过 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **bugfix** | Bug报告 → lite-fix → 修复代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **feature** (simple) | 需求 →lite-plan → lite-execute→ 代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
| **feature** (complex) | 需求 →plan → plan-verify→ 验证计划 → execute → 代码 →review-session-cycle → review-fix】→ 修复代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
| **bugfix** | Bug报告 → lite-fix → 修复代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
| **tdd** | 需求 → tdd-plan → TDD任务 → execute → 代码 → tdd-verify → TDD验证通过 |
| **test-fix** | 失败测试 → test-fix-gen → 测试任务 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **test-gen** | 代码 → test-gen → 测试 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **review** | 代码 → review → 审查发现 → review-fix → 修复代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **brainstorm** | 探索主题 → brainstorm:auto-parallel → 分析结果 → plan → 详细计划 → execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **multi-cli** | 需求 → multi-cli-plan → 对比计划 → lite-execute → 代码 → test-cycle-execute → 测试通过 |
| **test-fix** | 失败测试 →test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
| **test-gen** | 代码/会话test-gen → execute→ 测试通过 |
| **review** | 代码 →【review-session-cycle/review-module-cycle → review-fix→ 修复代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
| **brainstorm** | 探索主题 → brainstorm:auto-parallel → 分析结果 →【plan → plan-verify】→ 验证计划 → execute → 代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
| **multi-cli** | 需求 → multi-cli-plan → 对比计划 → lite-execute → 代码 →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute→ 测试通过 |
Use `CommandRegistry.getAllCommandsSummary()` to discover all commands dynamically.

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,28 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(
Main process orchestrator: intent analysis → workflow selection → command chain execution.
## Core Concept: Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
**Definition**: A set of commands that must execute together as an atomic group to achieve a meaningful workflow milestone.
**Why This Matters**:
- **Prevents Incomplete States**: Avoid stopping after task generation without execution
- **User Experience**: User gets complete results, not intermediate artifacts requiring manual follow-up
- **Workflow Integrity**: Maintains logical coherence of multi-step operations
**Key Units in CCW**:
| Unit Type | Pattern | Example |
|-----------|---------|---------|
| **Planning + Execution** | plan-cmd → execute-cmd | lite-plan → lite-execute |
| **Testing** | test-gen-cmd → test-exec-cmd | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute |
| **Review** | review-cmd → fix-cmd | review-session-cycle → review-fix |
**Atomic Rules**:
1. CCW automatically groups commands into minimum units - never splits them
2. Pipeline visualization shows units with `【 】` markers
3. Error handling preserves unit boundaries (retry/skip affects whole unit)
## Execution Model
**Synchronous (Main Process)**: Commands execute via SlashCommand in main process, blocking until complete.
@@ -105,7 +127,7 @@ function selectWorkflow(analysis) {
return buildCommandChain(selected, analysis);
}
// Build command chain (port-based matching)
// Build command chain (port-based matching with Minimum Execution Units)
function buildCommandChain(workflow, analysis) {
const chains = {
// Level 1 - Rapid
@@ -115,17 +137,24 @@ function buildCommandChain(workflow, analysis) {
// Level 2 - Lightweight
'rapid': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory' },
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'quick-impl' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
'bugfix.standard': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-fix', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
// Unit: Bug Fix【lite-fix → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-fix', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'bug-fix' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'bug-fix' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
@@ -134,59 +163,80 @@ function buildCommandChain(workflow, analysis) {
],
'multi-cli-plan': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:multi-cli-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory' },
// Unit: Multi-CLI Planning【multi-cli-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:multi-cli-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'multi-cli' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'multi-cli' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
'docs': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory' }
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'quick-impl' }
],
// Level 3 - Standard
'coupled': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '' },
// Unit: Verified Planning【plan → plan-verify】
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'verified-planning' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
// Execution
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '' },
// Unit: Code Review【review-session-cycle → review-fix】
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-fix', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
'tdd': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
// Unit: TDD Planning + Execution【tdd-plan → execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'tdd-planning' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '', unit: 'tdd-planning' },
// TDD Verification
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-verify', args: '' }
],
'test-fix-gen': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
],
'review-fix': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:review', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-fix', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
// Unit: Code Review【review-session-cycle → review-fix】
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-fix', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
],
'ui': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' }
// Unit: Planning + Execution【plan → execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '', unit: 'plan-execute' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '', unit: 'plan-execute' }
],
// Level 4 - Brainstorm
'full': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '' },
// Unit: Verified Planning【plan → plan-verify】
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
// Execution
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '' }
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
],
// Issue Workflow
@@ -351,15 +401,17 @@ Phase 5: Execute Command Chain
---
## Pipeline Examples
## Pipeline Examples (with Minimum Execution Units)
| Input | Type | Level | Commands |
|-------|------|-------|----------|
| "Add API endpoint" | feature (low) | 2 | lite-plan → lite-execute → test-cycle-execute |
| "Fix login timeout" | bugfix | 2 | lite-fix → test-cycle-execute |
| "OAuth2 system" | feature (high) | 3 | plan → plan-verify → execute → review-session-cycle → test-cycle-execute |
| "Implement with TDD" | tdd | 3 | tdd-plan → execute → tdd-verify |
| "Uncertain: real-time arch" | exploration | 4 | brainstorm:auto-parallel → plan → plan-verify → execute → test-cycle-execute |
**Note**: `【 】` marks Minimum Execution Units - commands execute together as atomic groups.
| Input | Type | Level | Pipeline (with Units) |
|-------|------|-------|-----------------------|
| "Add API endpoint" | feature (low) | 2 |【lite-plan → lite-execute】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute|
| "Fix login timeout" | bugfix | 2 |【lite-fix → lite-execute】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
| "OAuth2 system" | feature (high) | 3 |plan → plan-verify→ execute →【review-session-cycle → review-fix】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute|
| "Implement with TDD" | tdd | 3 |【tdd-plan → execute】→ tdd-verify |
| "Uncertain: real-time arch" | exploration | 4 | brainstorm:auto-parallel →【plan → plan-verify】→ execute →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
---
@@ -368,10 +420,11 @@ Phase 5: Execute Command Chain
1. **Main Process Execution** - Use SlashCommand in main process, no external CLI
2. **Intent-Driven** - Auto-select workflow based on task intent
3. **Port-Based Chaining** - Build command chain using port matching
4. **Progressive Clarification** - Low clarity triggers clarification phase
5. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCW prefix to isolate workflow todos
6. **Error Resilient** - Support retry/skip/abort error handling
7. **User Control** - Optional user confirmation at each phase
4. **Minimum Execution Units** - Commands grouped into atomic units, never split (e.g., lite-plan → lite-execute)
5. **Progressive Clarification** - Low clarity triggers clarification phase
6. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCW prefix to isolate workflow todos
7. **Unit-Aware Error Handling** - Retry/skip/abort affects whole unit, not individual commands
8. **User Control** - Optional user confirmation at each phase
---