refactor: spec-generator outputs from monolithic files to directory structure

Requirements, architecture, and epics now output as directories with
individual files per design point (_index.md + REQ-*.md/ADR-*.md/EPIC-*.md),
linked via relative paths for better referencing and downstream consumption.
Phase 6 handoff bridge simplified to read directly from individual EPIC files.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-02-11 17:24:18 +08:00
parent 5a4350beb4
commit 7aa1038951
9 changed files with 1394 additions and 136 deletions

View File

@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ Generates a complete specification package through 6 sequential phases:
| 1 | `spec-config.json` | Session configuration and state |
| 1 | `discovery-context.json` | Codebase exploration (optional) |
| 2 | `product-brief.md` | Product brief with multi-perspective synthesis |
| 3 | `requirements.md` | Detailed PRD with acceptance criteria |
| 4 | `architecture.md` | Architecture decisions and component design |
| 5 | `epics.md` | Epic/Story breakdown with dependencies |
| 3 | `requirements/` | `_index.md` + `REQ-NNN-{slug}.md` + `NFR-{type}-NNN-{slug}.md` |
| 4 | `architecture/` | `_index.md` + `ADR-NNN-{slug}.md` |
| 5 | `epics/` | `_index.md` + `EPIC-NNN-{slug}.md` |
| 6 | `readiness-report.md` | Quality validation report |
| 6 | `spec-summary.md` | One-page executive summary |

View File

@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ Phase 1: Discovery -> spec-config.json + discovery-context.json
|
Phase 2: Product Brief -> product-brief.md (multi-CLI parallel analysis)
|
Phase 3: Requirements (PRD) -> requirements.md
Phase 3: Requirements (PRD) -> requirements/ (_index.md + REQ-*.md + NFR-*.md)
|
Phase 4: Architecture -> architecture.md (multi-CLI review)
Phase 4: Architecture -> architecture/ (_index.md + ADR-*.md, multi-CLI review)
|
Phase 5: Epics & Stories -> epics.md
Phase 5: Epics & Stories -> epics/ (_index.md + EPIC-*.md)
|
Phase 6: Readiness Check -> readiness-report.md + spec-summary.md
|
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Phase 3: Requirements / PRD
|- Gemini CLI: expand goals into functional + non-functional requirements
|- Generate acceptance criteria per requirement
|- User priority sorting: MoSCoW (interactive, -y auto-assigns)
|- Output: requirements.md (from template)
|- Output: requirements/ directory (_index.md + REQ-*.md + NFR-*.md, from template)
Phase 4: Architecture
|- Ref: phases/04-architecture.md
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ Phase 4: Architecture
|- Codebase integration mapping (conditional)
|- Codex CLI: architecture challenge + review
|- Interactive ADR decisions (-y auto-accepts)
|- Output: architecture.md (from template)
|- Output: architecture/ directory (_index.md + ADR-*.md, from template)
Phase 5: Epics & Stories
|- Ref: phases/05-epics-stories.md
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Phase 5: Epics & Stories
|- Story generation: As a...I want...So that...
|- Dependency mapping (Mermaid)
|- Interactive validation (-y skips)
|- Output: epics.md (from template)
|- Output: epics/ directory (_index.md + EPIC-*.md, from template)
Phase 6: Readiness Check
|- Ref: phases/06-readiness-check.md
@@ -146,14 +146,21 @@ Bash(`mkdir -p "${workDir}"`);
```
.workflow/.spec/SPEC-{slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/
|- spec-config.json # Session configuration + phase state
|- discovery-context.json # Codebase exploration results (optional)
|- product-brief.md # Phase 2: Product brief
|- requirements.md # Phase 3: Detailed PRD
|- architecture.md # Phase 4: Architecture decisions
|- epics.md # Phase 5: Epic/Story breakdown
|- readiness-report.md # Phase 6: Quality report
|- spec-summary.md # Phase 6: One-page executive summary
├── spec-config.json # Session configuration + phase state
├── discovery-context.json # Codebase exploration results (optional)
├── product-brief.md # Phase 2: Product brief
├── requirements/ # Phase 3: Detailed PRD (directory)
│ ├── _index.md # Summary, MoSCoW table, traceability, links
│ ├── REQ-NNN-{slug}.md # Individual functional requirement
│ └── NFR-{type}-NNN-{slug}.md # Individual non-functional requirement
├── architecture/ # Phase 4: Architecture decisions (directory)
│ ├── _index.md # Overview, components, tech stack, links
│ └── ADR-NNN-{slug}.md # Individual Architecture Decision Record
├── epics/ # Phase 5: Epic/Story breakdown (directory)
│ ├── _index.md # Epic table, dependency map, MVP scope
│ └── EPIC-NNN-{slug}.md # Individual Epic with Stories
├── readiness-report.md # Phase 6: Quality report
└── spec-summary.md # Phase 6: One-page executive summary
```
## State Management
@@ -178,7 +185,8 @@ Bash(`mkdir -p "${workDir}"`);
},
"has_codebase": false,
"phasesCompleted": [
{ "phase": 1, "name": "discovery", "output_file": "spec-config.json", "completed_at": "ISO8601" }
{ "phase": 1, "name": "discovery", "output_file": "spec-config.json", "completed_at": "ISO8601" },
{ "phase": 3, "name": "requirements", "output_dir": "requirements/", "output_index": "requirements/_index.md", "file_count": 8, "completed_at": "ISO8601" }
]
}
```

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
# Phase 3: Requirements (PRD)
Generate a detailed Product Requirements Document with functional/non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and MoSCoW prioritization.
## Objective
- Read product-brief.md and extract goals, scope, constraints
- Expand each goal into functional requirements with acceptance criteria
- Generate non-functional requirements
- Apply MoSCoW priority labels (user input or auto)
- Generate requirements.md using template
## Input
- Dependency: `{workDir}/product-brief.md`
- Config: `{workDir}/spec-config.json`
- Template: `templates/requirements-prd.md` (directory structure: `_index.md` + `REQ-*.md` + `NFR-*.md`)
## Execution Steps
### Step 1: Load Phase 2 Context
```javascript
const specConfig = JSON.parse(Read(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`));
const productBrief = Read(`${workDir}/product-brief.md`);
// Extract key sections from product brief
// - Goals & Success Metrics table
// - Scope (in-scope items)
// - Target Users (personas)
// - Constraints
// - Technical perspective insights
```
### Step 2: Requirements Expansion via Gemini CLI
```javascript
Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate detailed functional and non-functional requirements from product brief.
Success: Complete PRD with testable acceptance criteria for every requirement.
PRODUCT BRIEF CONTEXT:
${productBrief}
TASK:
- For each goal in the product brief, generate 3-7 functional requirements
- Each requirement must have:
- Unique ID: REQ-NNN (zero-padded)
- Clear title
- Detailed description
- User story: As a [persona], I want [action] so that [benefit]
- 2-4 specific, testable acceptance criteria
- Generate non-functional requirements:
- Performance (response times, throughput)
- Security (authentication, authorization, data protection)
- Scalability (user load, data volume)
- Usability (accessibility, learnability)
- Assign initial MoSCoW priority based on:
- Must: Core functionality, cannot launch without
- Should: Important but has workaround
- Could: Nice-to-have, enhances experience
- Won't: Explicitly deferred
MODE: analysis
EXPECTED: Structured requirements with: ID, title, description, user story, acceptance criteria, priority, traceability to goals
CONSTRAINTS: Every requirement must be specific enough to estimate and test. No vague requirements like 'system should be fast'.
" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: true
});
// Wait for CLI result
```
### Step 3: User Priority Sorting (Interactive)
```javascript
if (!autoMode) {
// Present requirements grouped by initial priority
// Allow user to adjust MoSCoW labels
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "Review the Must-Have requirements. Any that should be reprioritized?",
header: "Must-Have",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "All correct", description: "Must-have requirements are accurate" },
{ label: "Too many", description: "Some should be Should/Could" },
{ label: "Missing items", description: "Some Should requirements should be Must" }
]
},
{
question: "What is the target MVP scope?",
header: "MVP Scope",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Must-Have only (Recommended)", description: "MVP includes only Must requirements" },
{ label: "Must + key Should", description: "Include critical Should items in MVP" },
{ label: "Comprehensive", description: "Include all Must and Should" }
]
}
]
});
// Apply user adjustments to priorities
} else {
// Auto mode: accept CLI-suggested priorities as-is
}
```
### Step 4: Generate requirements/ directory
```javascript
// Read template
const template = Read('templates/requirements-prd.md');
// Create requirements directory
Bash(`mkdir -p "${workDir}/requirements"`);
const status = autoMode ? 'complete' : 'draft';
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
// Parse CLI output into structured requirements
const funcReqs = parseFunctionalRequirements(cliOutput); // [{id, slug, title, priority, ...}]
const nfReqs = parseNonFunctionalRequirements(cliOutput); // [{id, type, slug, title, ...}]
// Step 4a: Write individual REQ-*.md files (one per functional requirement)
funcReqs.forEach(req => {
// Use REQ-NNN-{slug}.md template from templates/requirements-prd.md
// Fill: id, title, priority, description, user_story, acceptance_criteria, traces
Write(`${workDir}/requirements/REQ-${req.id}-${req.slug}.md`, reqContent);
});
// Step 4b: Write individual NFR-*.md files (one per non-functional requirement)
nfReqs.forEach(nfr => {
// Use NFR-{type}-NNN-{slug}.md template from templates/requirements-prd.md
// Fill: id, type, category, title, requirement, metric, target, traces
Write(`${workDir}/requirements/NFR-${nfr.type}-${nfr.id}-${nfr.slug}.md`, nfrContent);
});
// Step 4c: Write _index.md (summary + links to all individual files)
// Use _index.md template from templates/requirements-prd.md
// Fill: summary table, functional req links table, NFR links tables,
// data requirements, integration requirements, traceability matrix
Write(`${workDir}/requirements/_index.md`, indexContent);
// Update spec-config.json
specConfig.phasesCompleted.push({
phase: 3,
name: "requirements",
output_dir: "requirements/",
output_index: "requirements/_index.md",
file_count: funcReqs.length + nfReqs.length + 1,
completed_at: timestamp
});
Write(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`, JSON.stringify(specConfig, null, 2));
```
## Output
- **Directory**: `requirements/`
- `_index.md` — Summary, MoSCoW table, traceability matrix, links
- `REQ-NNN-{slug}.md` — Individual functional requirement (per requirement)
- `NFR-{type}-NNN-{slug}.md` — Individual non-functional requirement (per NFR)
- **Format**: Markdown with YAML frontmatter, cross-linked via relative paths
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] Functional requirements: >= 3 with REQ-NNN IDs, each in own file
- [ ] Every requirement file has >= 1 acceptance criterion
- [ ] Every requirement has MoSCoW priority tag in frontmatter
- [ ] Non-functional requirements: >= 1, each in own file
- [ ] User stories present for Must-have requirements
- [ ] `_index.md` links to all individual requirement files
- [ ] Traceability links to product-brief.md goals
- [ ] All files have valid YAML frontmatter
## Next Phase
Proceed to [Phase 4: Architecture](04-architecture.md) with the generated requirements.md.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
# Phase 4: Architecture
Generate technical architecture decisions, component design, and technology selections based on requirements.
## Objective
- Analyze requirements to identify core components and system architecture
- Generate Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with alternatives
- Map architecture to existing codebase (if applicable)
- Challenge architecture via Codex CLI review
- Generate architecture.md using template
## Input
- Dependency: `{workDir}/requirements/_index.md` (and individual `REQ-*.md` files)
- Reference: `{workDir}/product-brief.md`
- Optional: `{workDir}/discovery-context.json`
- Config: `{workDir}/spec-config.json`
- Template: `templates/architecture-doc.md`
## Execution Steps
### Step 1: Load Phase 2-3 Context
```javascript
const specConfig = JSON.parse(Read(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`));
const productBrief = Read(`${workDir}/product-brief.md`);
const requirements = Read(`${workDir}/requirements.md`);
let discoveryContext = null;
if (specConfig.has_codebase) {
try {
discoveryContext = JSON.parse(Read(`${workDir}/discovery-context.json`));
} catch (e) { /* no context */ }
}
```
### Step 2: Architecture Analysis via Gemini CLI
```javascript
Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate technical architecture for the specified requirements.
Success: Complete component architecture, tech stack, and ADRs with justified decisions.
PRODUCT BRIEF (summary):
${productBrief.slice(0, 3000)}
REQUIREMENTS:
${requirements.slice(0, 5000)}
${discoveryContext ? `EXISTING CODEBASE:
- Tech stack: ${JSON.stringify(discoveryContext.tech_stack || {})}
- Existing patterns: ${discoveryContext.existing_patterns?.slice(0,5).join('; ') || 'none'}
- Architecture constraints: ${discoveryContext.architecture_constraints?.slice(0,3).join('; ') || 'none'}
` : ''}
TASK:
- Define system architecture style (monolith, microservices, serverless, etc.) with justification
- Identify core components and their responsibilities
- Create component interaction diagram (Mermaid graph TD format)
- Specify technology stack: languages, frameworks, databases, infrastructure
- Generate 2-4 Architecture Decision Records (ADRs):
- Each ADR: context, decision, 2-3 alternatives with pros/cons, consequences
- Focus on: data storage, API design, authentication, key technical choices
- Define data model: key entities and relationships (Mermaid erDiagram format)
- Identify security architecture: auth, authorization, data protection
- List API endpoints (high-level)
${discoveryContext ? '- Map new components to existing codebase modules' : ''}
MODE: analysis
EXPECTED: Complete architecture with: style justification, component diagram, tech stack table, ADRs, data model, security controls, API overview
CONSTRAINTS: Architecture must support all Must-have requirements. Prefer proven technologies over cutting-edge.
" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: true
});
// Wait for CLI result
```
### Step 3: Architecture Review via Codex CLI
```javascript
// After receiving Gemini analysis, challenge it with Codex
Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Critical review of proposed architecture - identify weaknesses and risks.
Success: Actionable feedback with specific concerns and improvement suggestions.
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE:
${geminiArchitectureOutput.slice(0, 5000)}
REQUIREMENTS CONTEXT:
${requirements.slice(0, 2000)}
TASK:
- Challenge each ADR: are the alternatives truly the best options?
- Identify scalability bottlenecks in the component design
- Assess security gaps: authentication, authorization, data protection
- Evaluate technology choices: maturity, community support, fit
- Check for over-engineering or under-engineering
- Verify architecture covers all Must-have requirements
- Rate overall architecture quality: 1-5 with justification
MODE: analysis
EXPECTED: Architecture review with: per-ADR feedback, scalability concerns, security gaps, technology risks, quality rating
CONSTRAINTS: Be genuinely critical, not just validating. Focus on actionable improvements.
" --tool codex --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: true
});
// Wait for CLI result
```
### Step 4: Interactive ADR Decisions (Optional)
```javascript
if (!autoMode) {
// Present ADRs with review feedback to user
// For each ADR where review raised concerns:
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "Architecture review raised concerns. How should we proceed?",
header: "ADR Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Accept as-is", description: "Architecture is sound, proceed" },
{ label: "Incorporate feedback", description: "Adjust ADRs based on review" },
{ label: "Simplify", description: "Reduce complexity, fewer components" }
]
}
]
});
// Apply user decisions to architecture
}
```
### Step 5: Codebase Integration Mapping (Conditional)
```javascript
if (specConfig.has_codebase && discoveryContext) {
// Map new architecture components to existing code
const integrationMapping = discoveryContext.relevant_files.map(f => ({
new_component: "...", // matched from architecture
existing_module: f.path,
integration_type: "Extend|Replace|New",
notes: f.rationale
}));
// Include in architecture document
}
```
### Step 6: Generate architecture/ directory
```javascript
const template = Read('templates/architecture-doc.md');
// Create architecture directory
Bash(`mkdir -p "${workDir}/architecture"`);
const status = autoMode ? 'complete' : 'draft';
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
// Parse CLI outputs into structured ADRs
const adrs = parseADRs(geminiArchitectureOutput, codexReviewOutput); // [{id, slug, title, ...}]
// Step 6a: Write individual ADR-*.md files (one per decision)
adrs.forEach(adr => {
// Use ADR-NNN-{slug}.md template from templates/architecture-doc.md
// Fill: id, title, status, context, decision, alternatives, consequences, traces
Write(`${workDir}/architecture/ADR-${adr.id}-${adr.slug}.md`, adrContent);
});
// Step 6b: Write _index.md (overview + components + tech stack + links to ADRs)
// Use _index.md template from templates/architecture-doc.md
// Fill: system overview, component diagram, tech stack, ADR links table,
// data model, API design, security controls, infrastructure, codebase integration
Write(`${workDir}/architecture/_index.md`, indexContent);
// Update spec-config.json
specConfig.phasesCompleted.push({
phase: 4,
name: "architecture",
output_dir: "architecture/",
output_index: "architecture/_index.md",
file_count: adrs.length + 1,
completed_at: timestamp
});
Write(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`, JSON.stringify(specConfig, null, 2));
```
## Output
- **Directory**: `architecture/`
- `_index.md` — Overview, component diagram, tech stack, data model, security, links
- `ADR-NNN-{slug}.md` — Individual Architecture Decision Record (per ADR)
- **Format**: Markdown with YAML frontmatter, cross-linked to requirements via relative paths
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] Component diagram present in `_index.md` (Mermaid or ASCII)
- [ ] Tech stack specified (languages, frameworks, key libraries)
- [ ] >= 1 ADR file with alternatives considered
- [ ] Each ADR file lists >= 2 options
- [ ] `_index.md` ADR table links to all individual ADR files
- [ ] Integration points identified
- [ ] Data model described
- [ ] Codebase mapping present (if has_codebase)
- [ ] All files have valid YAML frontmatter
- [ ] ADR files link back to requirement files
## Next Phase
Proceed to [Phase 5: Epics & Stories](05-epics-stories.md) with the generated architecture.md.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
# Phase 5: Epics & Stories
Decompose the specification into executable Epics and Stories with dependency mapping.
## Objective
- Group requirements into 3-7 logical Epics
- Tag MVP subset of Epics
- Generate 2-5 Stories per Epic in standard user story format
- Map cross-Epic dependencies (Mermaid diagram)
- Generate epics.md using template
## Input
- Dependency: `{workDir}/requirements/_index.md`, `{workDir}/architecture/_index.md` (and individual files)
- Reference: `{workDir}/product-brief.md`
- Config: `{workDir}/spec-config.json`
- Template: `templates/epics-template.md` (directory structure: `_index.md` + `EPIC-*.md`)
## Execution Steps
### Step 1: Load Phase 2-4 Context
```javascript
const specConfig = JSON.parse(Read(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`));
const productBrief = Read(`${workDir}/product-brief.md`);
const requirements = Read(`${workDir}/requirements.md`);
const architecture = Read(`${workDir}/architecture.md`);
```
### Step 2: Epic Decomposition via Gemini CLI
```javascript
Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Decompose requirements into executable Epics and Stories for implementation planning.
Success: 3-7 Epics with prioritized Stories, dependency map, and MVP subset clearly defined.
PRODUCT BRIEF (summary):
${productBrief.slice(0, 2000)}
REQUIREMENTS:
${requirements.slice(0, 5000)}
ARCHITECTURE (summary):
${architecture.slice(0, 3000)}
TASK:
- Group requirements into 3-7 logical Epics:
- Each Epic: EPIC-NNN ID, title, description, priority (Must/Should/Could)
- Group by functional domain or user journey stage
- Tag MVP Epics (minimum set for initial release)
- For each Epic, generate 2-5 Stories:
- Each Story: STORY-{EPIC}-NNN ID, title
- User story format: As a [persona], I want [action] so that [benefit]
- 2-4 acceptance criteria per story (testable)
- Relative size estimate: S/M/L/XL
- Trace to source requirement(s): REQ-NNN
- Create dependency map:
- Cross-Epic dependencies (which Epics block others)
- Mermaid graph LR format
- Recommended execution order with rationale
- Define MVP:
- Which Epics are in MVP
- MVP definition of done (3-5 criteria)
- What is explicitly deferred post-MVP
MODE: analysis
EXPECTED: Structured output with: Epic list (ID, title, priority, MVP flag), Stories per Epic (ID, user story, AC, size, trace), dependency Mermaid diagram, execution order, MVP definition
CONSTRAINTS:
- Every Must-have requirement must appear in at least one Story
- Stories must be small enough to implement independently (no XL stories in MVP)
- Dependencies should be minimized across Epics
" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: true
});
// Wait for CLI result
```
### Step 3: Interactive Validation (Optional)
```javascript
if (!autoMode) {
// Present Epic overview table and dependency diagram
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
question: "Review the Epic breakdown. Any adjustments needed?",
header: "Epics",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Looks good", description: "Epic structure is appropriate" },
{ label: "Merge epics", description: "Some epics should be combined" },
{ label: "Split epic", description: "An epic is too large, needs splitting" },
{ label: "Adjust MVP", description: "Change which epics are in MVP" }
]
}
]
});
// Apply user adjustments
}
```
### Step 4: Generate epics/ directory
```javascript
const template = Read('templates/epics-template.md');
// Create epics directory
Bash(`mkdir -p "${workDir}/epics"`);
const status = autoMode ? 'complete' : 'draft';
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
// Parse CLI output into structured Epics
const epicsList = parseEpics(cliOutput); // [{id, slug, title, priority, mvp, size, stories[], reqs[], adrs[], deps[]}]
// Step 4a: Write individual EPIC-*.md files (one per Epic, stories included)
epicsList.forEach(epic => {
// Use EPIC-NNN-{slug}.md template from templates/epics-template.md
// Fill: id, title, priority, mvp, size, description, requirements links,
// architecture links, dependency links, stories with user stories + AC
Write(`${workDir}/epics/EPIC-${epic.id}-${epic.slug}.md`, epicContent);
});
// Step 4b: Write _index.md (overview + dependency map + MVP scope + traceability)
// Use _index.md template from templates/epics-template.md
// Fill: epic overview table (with links), dependency Mermaid diagram,
// execution order, MVP scope, traceability matrix, estimation summary
Write(`${workDir}/epics/_index.md`, indexContent);
// Update spec-config.json
specConfig.phasesCompleted.push({
phase: 5,
name: "epics-stories",
output_dir: "epics/",
output_index: "epics/_index.md",
file_count: epicsList.length + 1,
completed_at: timestamp
});
Write(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`, JSON.stringify(specConfig, null, 2));
```
## Output
- **Directory**: `epics/`
- `_index.md` — Overview table, dependency map, MVP scope, traceability matrix, links
- `EPIC-NNN-{slug}.md` — Individual Epic with Stories (per Epic)
- **Format**: Markdown with YAML frontmatter, cross-linked to requirements and architecture via relative paths
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] 3-7 Epic files with EPIC-NNN IDs
- [ ] >= 1 Epic tagged as MVP in frontmatter
- [ ] 2-5 Stories per Epic file
- [ ] Stories use "As a...I want...So that..." format
- [ ] `_index.md` has cross-Epic dependency map (Mermaid)
- [ ] `_index.md` links to all individual Epic files
- [ ] Relative sizing (S/M/L/XL) per Story
- [ ] Epic files link to requirement files and ADR files
- [ ] All files have valid YAML frontmatter
## Next Phase
Proceed to [Phase 6: Readiness Check](06-readiness-check.md) to validate the complete specification package.

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Validate the complete specification package, generate quality report and executi
## Input
- All Phase 2-5 outputs: `product-brief.md`, `requirements.md`, `architecture.md`, `epics.md`
- All Phase 2-5 outputs: `product-brief.md`, `requirements/_index.md` (+ `REQ-*.md`, `NFR-*.md`), `architecture/_index.md` (+ `ADR-*.md`), `epics/_index.md` (+ `EPIC-*.md`)
- Config: `{workDir}/spec-config.json`
- Reference: `specs/quality-gates.md`
@@ -24,10 +24,16 @@ Validate the complete specification package, generate quality report and executi
```javascript
const specConfig = JSON.parse(Read(`${workDir}/spec-config.json`));
const productBrief = Read(`${workDir}/product-brief.md`);
const requirements = Read(`${workDir}/requirements.md`);
const architecture = Read(`${workDir}/architecture.md`);
const epics = Read(`${workDir}/epics.md`);
const requirementsIndex = Read(`${workDir}/requirements/_index.md`);
const architectureIndex = Read(`${workDir}/architecture/_index.md`);
const epicsIndex = Read(`${workDir}/epics/_index.md`);
const qualityGates = Read('specs/quality-gates.md');
// Load individual files for deep validation
const reqFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/requirements/REQ-*.md`);
const nfrFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/requirements/NFR-*.md`);
const adrFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/architecture/ADR-*.md`);
const epicFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/epics/EPIC-*.md`);
```
### Step 2: Cross-Document Validation via Gemini CLI
@@ -42,14 +48,14 @@ DOCUMENTS TO VALIDATE:
=== PRODUCT BRIEF ===
${productBrief.slice(0, 3000)}
=== REQUIREMENTS ===
${requirements.slice(0, 4000)}
=== REQUIREMENTS INDEX (${reqFiles.length} REQ + ${nfrFiles.length} NFR files) ===
${requirementsIndex.slice(0, 3000)}
=== ARCHITECTURE ===
${architecture.slice(0, 3000)}
=== ARCHITECTURE INDEX (${adrFiles.length} ADR files) ===
${architectureIndex.slice(0, 2500)}
=== EPICS ===
${epics.slice(0, 3000)}
=== EPICS INDEX (${epicFiles.length} EPIC files) ===
${epicsIndex.slice(0, 2500)}
QUALITY CRITERIA (from quality-gates.md):
${qualityGates.slice(0, 2000)}
@@ -111,9 +117,9 @@ stepsCompleted: ["load-all", "cross-validation", "scoring", "report-generation"]
version: 1
dependencies:
- product-brief.md
- requirements.md
- architecture.md
- epics.md
- requirements/_index.md
- architecture/_index.md
- epics/_index.md
---`;
// Report content from CLI validation output:
@@ -139,9 +145,9 @@ stepsCompleted: ["synthesis"]
version: 1
dependencies:
- product-brief.md
- requirements.md
- architecture.md
- epics.md
- requirements/_index.md
- architecture/_index.md
- epics/_index.md
- readiness-report.md
---`;
@@ -161,13 +167,26 @@ Write(`${workDir}/spec-summary.md`, `${frontmatterSummary}\n\n${summaryContent}`
### Step 5: Update All Document Status
```javascript
// Update frontmatter status to 'complete' in all documents
const docs = ['product-brief.md', 'requirements.md', 'architecture.md', 'epics.md'];
for (const doc of docs) {
// Update frontmatter status to 'complete' in all documents (directories + single files)
// product-brief.md is a single file
const singleFiles = ['product-brief.md'];
singleFiles.forEach(doc => {
const content = Read(`${workDir}/${doc}`);
const updated = content.replace(/status: draft/, 'status: complete');
Write(`${workDir}/${doc}`, updated);
}
Write(`${workDir}/${doc}`, content.replace(/status: draft/, 'status: complete'));
});
// Update all files in directories (index + individual files)
const dirFiles = [
...Glob(`${workDir}/requirements/*.md`),
...Glob(`${workDir}/architecture/*.md`),
...Glob(`${workDir}/epics/*.md`)
];
dirFiles.forEach(filePath => {
const content = Read(filePath);
if (content.includes('status: draft')) {
Write(filePath, content.replace(/status: draft/, 'status: complete'));
}
});
// Update spec-config.json
specConfig.phasesCompleted.push({
@@ -214,23 +233,32 @@ AskUserQuestion({
if (selection === "Execute via lite-plan") {
// lite-plan accepts a text description directly
const epicsContent = Read(`${workDir}/epics.md`);
// Extract first MVP Epic's title + description as task input
const firstEpic = extractFirstMvpEpicDescription(epicsContent);
Skill(skill="workflow:lite-plan", args=`"${firstEpic}"`)
// Read first MVP Epic from individual EPIC-*.md files
const epicFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/epics/EPIC-*.md`);
const firstMvpFile = epicFiles.find(f => {
const content = Read(f);
return content.includes('mvp: true');
});
const epicContent = Read(firstMvpFile);
const title = extractTitle(epicContent); // First # heading
const description = extractSection(epicContent, "Description");
Skill(skill="workflow:lite-plan", args=`"${title}: ${description}"`)
}
if (selection === "Full planning" || selection === "Create roadmap") {
// === Bridge: Build brainstorm_artifacts compatible structure ===
// This enables workflow:plan's context-search-agent to discover spec artifacts
// via the standard .brainstorming/ directory convention.
// Reads from directory-based outputs (individual files), maps to .brainstorming/ format
// for context-search-agent auto-discovery → action-planning-agent consumption.
// Step A: Read all spec documents
// Step A: Read spec documents from directories
const specSummary = Read(`${workDir}/spec-summary.md`);
const productBrief = Read(`${workDir}/product-brief.md`);
const requirements = Read(`${workDir}/requirements.md`);
const architecture = Read(`${workDir}/architecture.md`);
const epics = Read(`${workDir}/epics.md`);
const requirementsIndex = Read(`${workDir}/requirements/_index.md`);
const architectureIndex = Read(`${workDir}/architecture/_index.md`);
const epicsIndex = Read(`${workDir}/epics/_index.md`);
// Read individual EPIC files (already split — direct mapping to feature-specs)
const epicFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/epics/EPIC-*.md`);
// Step B: Build structured description from spec-summary
const structuredDesc = `GOAL: ${extractGoal(specSummary)}
@@ -245,8 +273,8 @@ CONTEXT: Generated from spec session ${specConfig.session_id}. Source: ${workDir
const brainstormDir = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.brainstorming`;
Bash(`mkdir -p "${brainstormDir}/feature-specs"`);
// D.1: guidance-specification.md (highest priority - action-planning-agent reads first)
// Synthesized from spec-summary + product-brief key decisions + architecture decisions
// D.1: guidance-specification.md (highest priority action-planning-agent reads first)
// Synthesized from spec-summary + product-brief + architecture/requirements indexes
Write(`${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`, `
# ${specConfig.seed_analysis.problem_statement} - Confirmed Guidance Specification
@@ -259,80 +287,86 @@ ${extractSection(productBrief, "Vision")}
${extractSection(productBrief, "Goals")}
## 2. Requirements Summary
${extractSection(requirements, "Requirement Summary")}
${extractSection(requirementsIndex, "Functional Requirements")}
## 3. Architecture Decisions
${extractSection(architecture, "Architecture Decision Records")}
${extractSection(architecture, "Technology Stack")}
${extractSection(architectureIndex, "Architecture Decision Records")}
${extractSection(architectureIndex, "Technology Stack")}
## 4. Implementation Scope
${extractSection(epics, "Epic Overview")}
${extractSection(epics, "MVP Scope")}
${extractSection(epicsIndex, "Epic Overview")}
${extractSection(epicsIndex, "MVP Scope")}
## Feature Decomposition
${extractFeatureTable(epics)}
${extractSection(epicsIndex, "Traceability Matrix")}
## Appendix: Source Documents
| Document | Path | Description |
|----------|------|-------------|
| Product Brief | ${workDir}/product-brief.md | Vision, goals, scope |
| Requirements | ${workDir}/requirements.md | Functional + non-functional requirements |
| Architecture | ${workDir}/architecture.md | ADRs, tech stack, components |
| Epics | ${workDir}/epics.md | Epic/Story breakdown |
| Requirements | ${workDir}/requirements/ | _index.md + REQ-*.md + NFR-*.md |
| Architecture | ${workDir}/architecture/ | _index.md + ADR-*.md |
| Epics | ${workDir}/epics/ | _index.md + EPIC-*.md |
| Readiness Report | ${workDir}/readiness-report.md | Quality validation |
`);
// D.2: feature-index.json (each Epic mapped to a Feature)
// Path: feature-specs/feature-index.json (matches context-search-agent discovery at line 344)
const epicsList = parseEpics(epics); // Extract: id, slug, name, description, mvp, stories[]
const featureIndex = {
// D.2: feature-index.json (each EPIC file mapped to a Feature)
// Path: feature-specs/feature-index.json (matches context-search-agent discovery)
// Directly read from individual EPIC-*.md files (no monolithic parsing needed)
const features = epicFiles.map(epicFile => {
const content = Read(epicFile);
const fm = parseFrontmatter(content); // Extract YAML frontmatter
const basename = path.basename(epicFile, '.md'); // EPIC-001-slug
const epicNum = fm.id.replace('EPIC-', ''); // 001
const slug = basename.replace(/^EPIC-\d+-/, ''); // slug
return {
id: `F-${epicNum}`,
slug: slug,
name: extractTitle(content),
description: extractSection(content, "Description"),
priority: fm.mvp ? "High" : "Medium",
spec_path: `${brainstormDir}/feature-specs/F-${epicNum}-${slug}.md`,
source_epic: fm.id,
source_file: epicFile
};
});
Write(`${brainstormDir}/feature-specs/feature-index.json`, JSON.stringify({
version: "1.0",
source: "spec-generator",
spec_session: specConfig.session_id,
features: epicsList.map(epic => ({
id: `F-${epic.id.replace('EPIC-', '')}`,
slug: epic.slug,
name: epic.name,
description: epic.description,
priority: epic.mvp ? "High" : "Medium",
spec_path: `${brainstormDir}/feature-specs/F-${epic.id.replace('EPIC-','')}-${epic.slug}.md`,
source_epic: epic.id,
stories: epic.stories
})),
features,
cross_cutting_specs: []
};
Write(`${brainstormDir}/feature-specs/feature-index.json`, JSON.stringify(featureIndex, null, 2));
}, null, 2));
// D.3: Individual feature-spec files (one per Epic)
// D.3: Feature-spec files — directly adapt from individual EPIC-*.md files
// Since Epics are already individual documents, transform format directly
// Filename pattern: F-{num}-{slug}.md (matches context-search-agent glob F-*-*.md)
epicsList.forEach(epic => {
const epicDetail = extractEpicDetail(epics, epic.id);
const relatedReqs = extractRelatedRequirements(requirements, epic.id);
Write(`${brainstormDir}/feature-specs/F-${epic.id.replace('EPIC-','')}-${epic.slug}.md`, `
# Feature Spec: ${epic.id} - ${epic.name}
features.forEach(feature => {
const epicContent = Read(feature.source_file);
Write(feature.spec_path, `
# Feature Spec: ${feature.source_epic} - ${feature.name}
**Source**: ${workDir}/epics.md
**Priority**: ${epic.mvp ? "MVP" : "Post-MVP"}
**Related Requirements**: ${relatedReqs.join(', ')}
**Source**: ${feature.source_file}
**Priority**: ${feature.priority === "High" ? "MVP" : "Post-MVP"}
## Scope
${epicDetail.scope}
## Description
${extractSection(epicContent, "Description")}
## Stories
${epicDetail.stories.map(s => `- ${s.id}: ${s.title} (${s.estimate})`).join('\n')}
${extractSection(epicContent, "Stories")}
## Acceptance Criteria
${epicDetail.acceptanceCriteria}
## Requirements
${extractSection(epicContent, "Requirements")}
## Architecture Notes
${extractArchitectureNotes(architecture, epic.id)}
## Architecture
${extractSection(epicContent, "Architecture")}
`);
});
// Step E: Invoke downstream workflow
// context-search-agent will auto-discover .brainstorming/ files
// → context-package.json.brainstorm_artifacts populated
// → action-planning-agent loads guidance_specification (priority 1) + feature_index (priority 2)
// → action-planning-agent loads guidance_specification (P1) + feature_index (P2)
if (selection === "Full planning") {
Skill(skill="workflow:plan", args=`"${structuredDesc}"`)
} else {
@@ -341,11 +375,13 @@ ${extractArchitectureNotes(architecture, epic.id)}
}
if (selection === "Create Issues") {
// For each Epic, create an issue
const epics = Read(`${workDir}/epics.md`);
const epicsList = parseEpics(epics);
epicsList.forEach(epic => {
Skill(skill="issue:new", args=`"${epic.name}: ${epic.description}"`)
// For each EPIC file, create an issue (read directly from individual files)
const epicFiles = Glob(`${workDir}/epics/EPIC-*.md`);
epicFiles.forEach(epicFile => {
const content = Read(epicFile);
const title = extractTitle(content);
const description = extractSection(content, "Description");
Skill(skill="issue:new", args=`"${title}: ${description}"`)
});
}
@@ -354,12 +390,17 @@ if (selection === "Create Issues") {
#### Helper Functions Reference (pseudocode)
The following helper functions are used in the handoff bridge. They operate on the markdown content loaded from spec documents:
The following helper functions are used in the handoff bridge. They operate on markdown content from individual spec files:
```javascript
// Extract the first MVP Epic's title + scope as a one-line task description
function extractFirstMvpEpicDescription(epicsContent) {
// Find first Epic marked as MVP, return: "Epic Name - Brief scope description"
// Extract title from a markdown document (first # heading)
function extractTitle(markdown) {
// Return the text after the first # heading (e.g., "# EPIC-001: Title" → "Title")
}
// Parse YAML frontmatter from markdown (between --- markers)
function parseFrontmatter(markdown) {
// Return object with: id, priority, mvp, size, requirements, architecture, dependencies
}
// Extract GOAL/SCOPE from spec-summary frontmatter or ## sections
@@ -370,31 +411,6 @@ function extractScope(specSummary) { /* Return the Scope/MVP boundary */ }
function extractSection(markdown, sectionName) {
// Return content between ## {sectionName} and next ## heading
}
// Build a markdown table of Epics from epics.md
function extractFeatureTable(epicsContent) {
// Return: | Epic ID | Name | Priority | Story Count |
}
// Parse epics.md into structured Epic objects
function parseEpics(epicsContent) {
// Returns: [{ id, slug, name, description, mvp, stories[] }]
}
// Extract detailed Epic section (scope, stories, acceptance criteria)
function extractEpicDetail(epicsContent, epicId) {
// Returns: { scope, stories[], acceptanceCriteria }
}
// Find requirements related to a specific Epic
function extractRelatedRequirements(requirementsContent, epicId) {
// Returns: ["REQ-001", "REQ-003"] based on traceability references
}
// Extract architecture notes relevant to a specific Epic
function extractArchitectureNotes(architectureContent, epicId) {
// Returns: relevant ADRs, component references, tech stack notes
}
```
## Output
@@ -405,14 +421,14 @@ function extractArchitectureNotes(architectureContent, epicId) {
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] All 4 documents validated (product-brief, requirements, architecture, epics)
- [ ] All frontmatter parseable and valid
- [ ] Cross-references checked
- [ ] All document directories validated (product-brief, requirements/, architecture/, epics/)
- [ ] All frontmatter parseable and valid (index + individual files)
- [ ] Cross-references checked (relative links between directories)
- [ ] Overall quality score calculated
- [ ] No unresolved Error-severity issues
- [ ] Traceability matrix generated
- [ ] spec-summary.md created
- [ ] All document statuses updated to 'complete'
- [ ] All document statuses updated to 'complete' (all files in all directories)
- [ ] Handoff options presented
## Completion
@@ -421,13 +437,13 @@ This is the final phase. The specification package is ready for execution handof
### Output Files Manifest
| File | Phase | Description |
| Path | Phase | Description |
|------|-------|-------------|
| `spec-config.json` | 1 | Session configuration and state |
| `discovery-context.json` | 1 | Codebase exploration (optional) |
| `product-brief.md` | 2 | Product brief with multi-perspective synthesis |
| `requirements.md` | 3 | Detailed PRD with MoSCoW priorities |
| `architecture.md` | 4 | Architecture decisions and component design |
| `epics.md` | 5 | Epic/Story breakdown with dependencies |
| `requirements/` | 3 | Directory: `_index.md` + `REQ-*.md` + `NFR-*.md` |
| `architecture/` | 4 | Directory: `_index.md` + `ADR-*.md` |
| `epics/` | 5 | Directory: `_index.md` + `EPIC-*.md` |
| `readiness-report.md` | 6 | Quality validation report |
| `spec-summary.md` | 6 | One-page executive summary |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
# Architecture Document Template (Directory Structure)
Template for generating architecture decision documents as a directory of individual ADR files in Phase 4.
## Usage Context
| Phase | Usage |
|-------|-------|
| Phase 4 (Architecture) | Generate `architecture/` directory from requirements analysis |
| Output Location | `{workDir}/architecture/` |
## Output Structure
```
{workDir}/architecture/
├── _index.md # Overview, components, tech stack, data model, security
├── ADR-001-{slug}.md # Individual Architecture Decision Record
├── ADR-002-{slug}.md
└── ...
```
---
## Template: _index.md
```markdown
---
session_id: {session_id}
phase: 4
document_type: architecture-index
status: draft
generated_at: {timestamp}
version: 1
dependencies:
- ../spec-config.json
- ../product-brief.md
- ../requirements/_index.md
---
# Architecture: {product_name}
{executive_summary - high-level architecture approach and key decisions}
## System Overview
### Architecture Style
{description of chosen architecture style: microservices, monolith, serverless, etc.}
### System Context Diagram
```mermaid
C4Context
title System Context Diagram
Person(user, "User", "Primary user")
System(system, "{product_name}", "Core system")
System_Ext(ext1, "{external_system}", "{description}")
Rel(user, system, "Uses")
Rel(system, ext1, "Integrates with")
```
## Component Architecture
### Component Diagram
```mermaid
graph TD
subgraph "{product_name}"
A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
B --> C[Component C]
A --> D[Component D]
end
B --> E[External Service]
```
### Component Descriptions
| Component | Responsibility | Technology | Dependencies |
|-----------|---------------|------------|--------------|
| {component_name} | {what it does} | {tech stack} | {depends on} |
## Technology Stack
### Core Technologies
| Layer | Technology | Version | Rationale |
|-------|-----------|---------|-----------|
| Frontend | {technology} | {version} | {why chosen} |
| Backend | {technology} | {version} | {why chosen} |
| Database | {technology} | {version} | {why chosen} |
| Infrastructure | {technology} | {version} | {why chosen} |
### Key Libraries & Frameworks
| Library | Purpose | License |
|---------|---------|---------|
| {library_name} | {purpose} | {license} |
## Architecture Decision Records
| ADR | Title | Status | Key Choice |
|-----|-------|--------|------------|
| [ADR-001](ADR-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | Accepted | {one-line summary} |
| [ADR-002](ADR-002-{slug}.md) | {title} | Accepted | {one-line summary} |
| [ADR-003](ADR-003-{slug}.md) | {title} | Proposed | {one-line summary} |
## Data Architecture
### Data Model
```mermaid
erDiagram
ENTITY_A ||--o{ ENTITY_B : "has many"
ENTITY_A {
string id PK
string name
datetime created_at
}
ENTITY_B {
string id PK
string entity_a_id FK
string value
}
```
### Data Storage Strategy
| Data Type | Storage | Retention | Backup |
|-----------|---------|-----------|--------|
| {type} | {storage solution} | {retention policy} | {backup strategy} |
## API Design
### API Overview
| Endpoint | Method | Purpose | Auth |
|----------|--------|---------|------|
| {/api/resource} | {GET/POST/etc} | {purpose} | {auth type} |
## Security Architecture
### Security Controls
| Control | Implementation | Requirement |
|---------|---------------|-------------|
| Authentication | {approach} | [NFR-S-{NNN}](../requirements/NFR-S-{NNN}-{slug}.md) |
| Authorization | {approach} | [NFR-S-{NNN}](../requirements/NFR-S-{NNN}-{slug}.md) |
| Data Protection | {approach} | [NFR-S-{NNN}](../requirements/NFR-S-{NNN}-{slug}.md) |
## Infrastructure & Deployment
### Deployment Architecture
{description of deployment model: containers, serverless, VMs, etc.}
### Environment Strategy
| Environment | Purpose | Configuration |
|-------------|---------|---------------|
| Development | Local development | {config} |
| Staging | Pre-production testing | {config} |
| Production | Live system | {config} |
## Codebase Integration
{if has_codebase is true:}
### Existing Code Mapping
| New Component | Existing Module | Integration Type | Notes |
|--------------|----------------|------------------|-------|
| {component} | {existing module path} | Extend/Replace/New | {notes} |
### Migration Notes
{any migration considerations for existing code}
## Quality Attributes
| Attribute | Target | Measurement | ADR Reference |
|-----------|--------|-------------|---------------|
| Performance | {target} | {how measured} | [ADR-{NNN}](ADR-{NNN}-{slug}.md) |
| Scalability | {target} | {how measured} | [ADR-{NNN}](ADR-{NNN}-{slug}.md) |
| Reliability | {target} | {how measured} | [ADR-{NNN}](ADR-{NNN}-{slug}.md) |
## Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation |
|------|--------|-------------|------------|
| {risk} | High/Medium/Low | High/Medium/Low | {mitigation approach} |
## Open Questions
- [ ] {architectural question 1}
- [ ] {architectural question 2}
## References
- Derived from: [Requirements](../requirements/_index.md), [Product Brief](../product-brief.md)
- Next: [Epics & Stories](../epics/_index.md)
```
---
## Template: ADR-NNN-{slug}.md (Individual Architecture Decision Record)
```markdown
---
id: ADR-{NNN}
status: Accepted
traces_to: [{REQ-NNN}, {NFR-X-NNN}]
date: {timestamp}
---
# ADR-{NNN}: {decision_title}
## Context
{what is the situation that motivates this decision}
## Decision
{what is the chosen approach}
## Alternatives Considered
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|--------|------|------|
| {option_1 - chosen} | {pros} | {cons} |
| {option_2} | {pros} | {cons} |
| {option_3} | {pros} | {cons} |
## Consequences
- **Positive**: {positive outcomes}
- **Negative**: {tradeoffs accepted}
- **Risks**: {risks to monitor}
## Traces
- **Requirements**: [REQ-{NNN}](../requirements/REQ-{NNN}-{slug}.md), [NFR-X-{NNN}](../requirements/NFR-X-{NNN}-{slug}.md)
- **Implemented by**: [EPIC-{NNN}](../epics/EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md) (added in Phase 5)
```
---
## Variable Descriptions
| Variable | Source | Description |
|----------|--------|-------------|
| `{session_id}` | spec-config.json | Session identifier |
| `{timestamp}` | Runtime | ISO8601 generation timestamp |
| `{product_name}` | product-brief.md | Product/feature name |
| `{NNN}` | Auto-increment | ADR/requirement number |
| `{slug}` | Auto-generated | Kebab-case from decision title |
| `{has_codebase}` | spec-config.json | Whether existing codebase exists |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
# Epics & Stories Template (Directory Structure)
Template for generating epic/story breakdown as a directory of individual Epic files in Phase 5.
## Usage Context
| Phase | Usage |
|-------|-------|
| Phase 5 (Epics & Stories) | Generate `epics/` directory from requirements decomposition |
| Output Location | `{workDir}/epics/` |
## Output Structure
```
{workDir}/epics/
├── _index.md # Overview table + dependency map + MVP scope + execution order
├── EPIC-001-{slug}.md # Individual Epic with its Stories
├── EPIC-002-{slug}.md
└── ...
```
---
## Template: _index.md
```markdown
---
session_id: {session_id}
phase: 5
document_type: epics-index
status: draft
generated_at: {timestamp}
version: 1
dependencies:
- ../spec-config.json
- ../product-brief.md
- ../requirements/_index.md
- ../architecture/_index.md
---
# Epics & Stories: {product_name}
{executive_summary - overview of epic structure and MVP scope}
## Epic Overview
| Epic ID | Title | Priority | MVP | Stories | Est. Size |
|---------|-------|----------|-----|---------|-----------|
| [EPIC-001](EPIC-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | Must | Yes | {n} | {S/M/L/XL} |
| [EPIC-002](EPIC-002-{slug}.md) | {title} | Must | Yes | {n} | {S/M/L/XL} |
| [EPIC-003](EPIC-003-{slug}.md) | {title} | Should | No | {n} | {S/M/L/XL} |
## Dependency Map
```mermaid
graph LR
EPIC-001 --> EPIC-002
EPIC-001 --> EPIC-003
EPIC-002 --> EPIC-004
EPIC-003 --> EPIC-005
```
### Dependency Notes
{explanation of why these dependencies exist and suggested execution order}
### Recommended Execution Order
1. [EPIC-{NNN}](EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md): {reason - foundational}
2. [EPIC-{NNN}](EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md): {reason - depends on #1}
3. ...
## MVP Scope
### MVP Epics
{list of epics included in MVP with justification, linking to each}
### MVP Definition of Done
- [ ] {MVP completion criterion 1}
- [ ] {MVP completion criterion 2}
- [ ] {MVP completion criterion 3}
## Traceability Matrix
| Requirement | Epic | Stories | Architecture |
|-------------|------|---------|--------------|
| [REQ-001](../requirements/REQ-001-{slug}.md) | [EPIC-001](EPIC-001-{slug}.md) | STORY-001-001, STORY-001-002 | [ADR-001](../architecture/ADR-001-{slug}.md) |
| [REQ-002](../requirements/REQ-002-{slug}.md) | [EPIC-001](EPIC-001-{slug}.md) | STORY-001-003 | Component B |
| [REQ-003](../requirements/REQ-003-{slug}.md) | [EPIC-002](EPIC-002-{slug}.md) | STORY-002-001 | [ADR-002](../architecture/ADR-002-{slug}.md) |
## Estimation Summary
| Size | Meaning | Count |
|------|---------|-------|
| S | Small - well-understood, minimal risk | {n} |
| M | Medium - some complexity, moderate risk | {n} |
| L | Large - significant complexity, should consider splitting | {n} |
| XL | Extra Large - high complexity, must split before implementation | {n} |
## Risks & Considerations
| Risk | Affected Epics | Mitigation |
|------|---------------|------------|
| {risk description} | [EPIC-{NNN}](EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md) | {mitigation} |
## Open Questions
- [ ] {question about scope or implementation 1}
- [ ] {question about scope or implementation 2}
## References
- Derived from: [Requirements](../requirements/_index.md), [Architecture](../architecture/_index.md)
- Handoff to: execution workflows (lite-plan, plan, req-plan)
```
---
## Template: EPIC-NNN-{slug}.md (Individual Epic)
```markdown
---
id: EPIC-{NNN}
priority: {Must|Should|Could}
mvp: {true|false}
size: {S|M|L|XL}
requirements: [REQ-{NNN}]
architecture: [ADR-{NNN}]
dependencies: [EPIC-{NNN}]
status: draft
---
# EPIC-{NNN}: {epic_title}
**Priority**: {Must|Should|Could}
**MVP**: {Yes|No}
**Estimated Size**: {S|M|L|XL}
## Description
{detailed epic description}
## Requirements
- [REQ-{NNN}](../requirements/REQ-{NNN}-{slug}.md): {title}
- [REQ-{NNN}](../requirements/REQ-{NNN}-{slug}.md): {title}
## Architecture
- [ADR-{NNN}](../architecture/ADR-{NNN}-{slug}.md): {title}
- Component: {component_name}
## Dependencies
- [EPIC-{NNN}](EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md) (blocking): {reason}
- [EPIC-{NNN}](EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md) (soft): {reason}
## Stories
### STORY-{EPIC}-001: {story_title}
**User Story**: As a {persona}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] {criterion 1}
- [ ] {criterion 2}
- [ ] {criterion 3}
**Size**: {S|M|L|XL}
**Traces to**: [REQ-{NNN}](../requirements/REQ-{NNN}-{slug}.md)
---
### STORY-{EPIC}-002: {story_title}
**User Story**: As a {persona}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] {criterion 1}
- [ ] {criterion 2}
**Size**: {S|M|L|XL}
**Traces to**: [REQ-{NNN}](../requirements/REQ-{NNN}-{slug}.md)
```
---
## Variable Descriptions
| Variable | Source | Description |
|----------|--------|-------------|
| `{session_id}` | spec-config.json | Session identifier |
| `{timestamp}` | Runtime | ISO8601 generation timestamp |
| `{product_name}` | product-brief.md | Product/feature name |
| `{EPIC}` | Auto-increment | Epic number (3 digits) |
| `{NNN}` | Auto-increment | Story/requirement number |
| `{slug}` | Auto-generated | Kebab-case from epic/story title |
| `{S\|M\|L\|XL}` | CLI analysis | Relative size estimate |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
# Requirements PRD Template (Directory Structure)
Template for generating Product Requirements Document as a directory of individual requirement files in Phase 3.
## Usage Context
| Phase | Usage |
|-------|-------|
| Phase 3 (Requirements) | Generate `requirements/` directory from product brief expansion |
| Output Location | `{workDir}/requirements/` |
## Output Structure
```
{workDir}/requirements/
├── _index.md # Summary + MoSCoW table + traceability matrix + links
├── REQ-001-{slug}.md # Individual functional requirement
├── REQ-002-{slug}.md
├── NFR-P-001-{slug}.md # Non-functional: Performance
├── NFR-S-001-{slug}.md # Non-functional: Security
├── NFR-SC-001-{slug}.md # Non-functional: Scalability
├── NFR-U-001-{slug}.md # Non-functional: Usability
└── ...
```
---
## Template: _index.md
```markdown
---
session_id: {session_id}
phase: 3
document_type: requirements-index
status: draft
generated_at: {timestamp}
version: 1
dependencies:
- ../spec-config.json
- ../product-brief.md
---
# Requirements: {product_name}
{executive_summary - brief overview of what this PRD covers and key decisions}
## Requirement Summary
| Priority | Count | Coverage |
|----------|-------|----------|
| Must Have | {n} | {description of must-have scope} |
| Should Have | {n} | {description of should-have scope} |
| Could Have | {n} | {description of could-have scope} |
| Won't Have | {n} | {description of explicitly excluded} |
## Functional Requirements
| ID | Title | Priority | Traces To |
|----|-------|----------|-----------|
| [REQ-001](REQ-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | Must | [G-001](../product-brief.md#goals--success-metrics) |
| [REQ-002](REQ-002-{slug}.md) | {title} | Must | [G-001](../product-brief.md#goals--success-metrics) |
| [REQ-003](REQ-003-{slug}.md) | {title} | Should | [G-002](../product-brief.md#goals--success-metrics) |
## Non-Functional Requirements
### Performance
| ID | Title | Target |
|----|-------|--------|
| [NFR-P-001](NFR-P-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | {target value} |
### Security
| ID | Title | Standard |
|----|-------|----------|
| [NFR-S-001](NFR-S-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | {standard/framework} |
### Scalability
| ID | Title | Target |
|----|-------|--------|
| [NFR-SC-001](NFR-SC-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | {target value} |
### Usability
| ID | Title | Target |
|----|-------|--------|
| [NFR-U-001](NFR-U-001-{slug}.md) | {title} | {target value} |
## Data Requirements
### Data Entities
| Entity | Description | Key Attributes |
|--------|-------------|----------------|
| {entity_name} | {description} | {attr1, attr2, attr3} |
### Data Flows
{description of key data flows, optionally with Mermaid diagram}
## Integration Requirements
| System | Direction | Protocol | Data Format | Notes |
|--------|-----------|----------|-------------|-------|
| {system_name} | Inbound/Outbound/Both | {REST/gRPC/etc} | {JSON/XML/etc} | {notes} |
## Constraints & Assumptions
### Constraints
- {technical or business constraint 1}
- {technical or business constraint 2}
### Assumptions
- {assumption 1 - must be validated}
- {assumption 2 - must be validated}
## Priority Rationale
{explanation of MoSCoW prioritization decisions, especially for Should/Could boundaries}
## Traceability Matrix
| Goal | Requirements |
|------|-------------|
| G-001 | [REQ-001](REQ-001-{slug}.md), [REQ-002](REQ-002-{slug}.md), [NFR-P-001](NFR-P-001-{slug}.md) |
| G-002 | [REQ-003](REQ-003-{slug}.md), [NFR-S-001](NFR-S-001-{slug}.md) |
## Open Questions
- [ ] {unresolved question 1}
- [ ] {unresolved question 2}
## References
- Derived from: [Product Brief](../product-brief.md)
- Next: [Architecture](../architecture/_index.md)
```
---
## Template: REQ-NNN-{slug}.md (Individual Functional Requirement)
```markdown
---
id: REQ-{NNN}
type: functional
priority: {Must|Should|Could|Won't}
traces_to: [G-{NNN}]
status: draft
---
# REQ-{NNN}: {requirement_title}
**Priority**: {Must|Should|Could|Won't}
## Description
{detailed requirement description}
## User Story
As a {persona}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {specific, testable criterion 1}
- [ ] {specific, testable criterion 2}
- [ ] {specific, testable criterion 3}
## Traces
- **Goal**: [G-{NNN}](../product-brief.md#goals--success-metrics)
- **Architecture**: [ADR-{NNN}](../architecture/ADR-{NNN}-{slug}.md) (if applicable)
- **Implemented by**: [EPIC-{NNN}](../epics/EPIC-{NNN}-{slug}.md) (added in Phase 5)
```
---
## Template: NFR-{type}-NNN-{slug}.md (Individual Non-Functional Requirement)
```markdown
---
id: NFR-{type}-{NNN}
type: non-functional
category: {Performance|Security|Scalability|Usability}
priority: {Must|Should|Could}
status: draft
---
# NFR-{type}-{NNN}: {requirement_title}
**Category**: {Performance|Security|Scalability|Usability}
**Priority**: {Must|Should|Could}
## Requirement
{detailed requirement description}
## Metric & Target
| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
|--------|--------|--------------------|
| {metric} | {target value} | {how measured} |
## Traces
- **Goal**: [G-{NNN}](../product-brief.md#goals--success-metrics)
- **Architecture**: [ADR-{NNN}](../architecture/ADR-{NNN}-{slug}.md) (if applicable)
```
---
## Variable Descriptions
| Variable | Source | Description |
|----------|--------|-------------|
| `{session_id}` | spec-config.json | Session identifier |
| `{timestamp}` | Runtime | ISO8601 generation timestamp |
| `{product_name}` | product-brief.md | Product/feature name |
| `{NNN}` | Auto-increment | Requirement number (zero-padded 3 digits) |
| `{slug}` | Auto-generated | Kebab-case from requirement title |
| `{type}` | Category | P (Performance), S (Security), SC (Scalability), U (Usability) |
| `{Must\|Should\|Could\|Won't}` | User input / auto | MoSCoW priority tag |