feat(codex): convert 4 workflow commands to Codex prompt format with serial execution

Convert parallel multi-agent/multi-CLI workflows to Codex-compatible serial execution:

- brainstorm-with-file: Parallel Creative/Pragmatic/Systematic perspectives → Serial CLI execution
- analyze-with-file: cli-explore-agent + parallel CLI → Native tools (Glob/Grep/Read) + serial Gemini CLI
- collaborative-plan-with-file: Parallel sub-agents → Serial domain planning loop
- unified-execute-with-file: DAG-based parallel wave execution → Serial task-by-task execution

Key Technical Changes:
- YAML header: Remove 'name' and 'allowed-tools' fields
- Variables: $ARGUMENTS → $TOPIC/$TASK/$PLAN
- Task agents: Task() calls → ccw cli commands with --tool flag
- Parallel execution: Parallel Task/Bash calls → Sequential loops
- Session format: Match existing Codex prompt structure

Pattern: For multi-step workflows, use explicit wait points with " Wait for completion before proceeding"
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-02-01 17:20:00 +08:00
parent e9789e747a
commit 8dc115a894
4 changed files with 1551 additions and 1352 deletions

View File

@@ -1,29 +1,24 @@
---
description: Interactive collaborative analysis with documented discussions, CLI-assisted exploration, and evolving understanding. Supports depth control and iteration limits.
argument-hint: "TOPIC=\"<topic or question>\" [--depth=standard|deep|full] [--max-iterations=<n>] [--verbose]"
description: Interactive collaborative analysis with documented discussions, CLI-assisted exploration, and evolving understanding. Serial analysis for Codex.
argument-hint: "TOPIC=\"<question or topic>\" [--focus=<area>] [--depth=quick|standard|deep] [--continue]"
---
# Codex Analyze-With-File Prompt
## Overview
Interactive collaborative analysis workflow with **documented discussion process**. Records understanding evolution, facilitates multi-round Q&A, and uses deep analysis for codebase and concept exploration.
Interactive collaborative analysis workflow with **documented discussion process**. Records understanding evolution, facilitates multi-round Q&A, and uses CLI tools for deep exploration.
**Core workflow**: Topic → Explore → Discuss → Document → Refine → Conclude
**Key features**:
- **discussion.md**: Timeline of discussions and understanding evolution
- **Multi-round Q&A**: Iterative clarification with user
- **Analysis-assisted exploration**: Deep codebase and concept analysis
- **Consolidated insights**: Synthesizes discussions into actionable conclusions
- **Flexible continuation**: Resume analysis sessions to build on previous work
## Target Topic
**$TOPIC**
- `--depth`: Analysis depth (standard|deep|full)
- `--max-iterations`: Max discussion rounds
**Parameters**:
- `--focus`: Focus area (code|architecture|practice|diagnosis, default: code)
- `--depth`: Analysis depth (quick/standard/deep, default: standard)
- `--continue`: Resume existing analysis session
## Execution Process
@@ -35,54 +30,68 @@ Session Detection:
Phase 1: Topic Understanding
├─ Parse topic/question
├─ Identify analysis dimensions (architecture, implementation, concept, etc.)
├─ Identify analysis dimensions
├─ Initial scoping with user
└─ Document initial understanding in discussion.md
└─ Initialize discussion.md
Phase 2: Exploration (Parallel)
├─ Search codebase for relevant patterns
├─ Analyze code structure and dependencies
└─ Aggregate findings into exploration summary
Phase 2: CLI Exploration (Serial)
├─ Step 1: Codebase context gathering (Glob/Grep/Read)
├─ Step 2: Gemini CLI analysis (build on codebase findings)
└─ Aggregate findings into explorations.json
Phase 3: Interactive Discussion (Multi-Round)
├─ Present exploration findings
├─ Facilitate Q&A with user
├─ Capture user insights and requirements
├─ Capture user insights and corrections
├─ Actions: Deepen | Adjust | Answer | Complete
├─ Update discussion.md with each round
└─ Repeat until user is satisfied or clarity achieved
└─ Repeat until clarity achieved (max 5 rounds)
Phase 4: Synthesis & Conclusion
├─ Consolidate all insights
├─ Update discussion.md with conclusions
├─ Generate actionable recommendations
└─ Optional: Create follow-up tasks or issues
├─ Generate conclusions with recommendations
├─ Update discussion.md with final synthesis
└─ Offer follow-up options
Output:
├─ .workflow/.analysis/{slug}-{date}/discussion.md (evolving document)
├─ .workflow/.analysis/{slug}-{date}/explorations.json (findings)
├─ .workflow/.analysis/{slug}-{date}/discussion.md (evolution)
├─ .workflow/.analysis/{slug}-{date}/exploration-codebase.json (codebase context)
├─ .workflow/.analysis/{slug}-{date}/explorations.json (CLI findings)
└─ .workflow/.analysis/{slug}-{date}/conclusions.json (final synthesis)
```
## Output Structure
```
.workflow/.analysis/ANL-{slug}-{date}/
├── discussion.md # ⭐ Evolution of understanding & discussions
├── exploration-codebase.json # Phase 2: Codebase context
├── explorations.json # Phase 2: CLI analysis findings
└── conclusions.json # Phase 4: Final synthesis
```
---
## Implementation Details
### Session Setup & Mode Detection
### Session Setup
```javascript
const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
const topicSlug = "$TOPIC".toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 40)
const topicSlug = "$TOPIC".toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+/g, '-').substring(0, 40)
const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
const sessionId = `ANL-${topicSlug}-${dateStr}`
const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.analysis/${sessionId}`
const discussionPath = `${sessionFolder}/discussion.md`
const explorationPath = `${sessionFolder}/exploration-codebase.json`
const explorationsPath = `${sessionFolder}/explorations.json`
const conclusionsPath = `${sessionFolder}/conclusions.json`
// Auto-detect mode
const sessionExists = fs.existsSync(sessionFolder)
const hasDiscussion = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(discussionPath)
const mode = hasDiscussion ? 'continue' : 'new'
if (!sessionExists) {
@@ -97,15 +106,14 @@ if (!sessionExists) {
#### Step 1.1: Parse Topic & Identify Dimensions
```javascript
// Analyze topic to determine analysis dimensions
const ANALYSIS_DIMENSIONS = {
architecture: ['架构', 'architecture', 'design', 'structure', '设计'],
implementation: ['实现', 'implement', 'code', 'coding', '代码'],
performance: ['性能', 'performance', 'optimize', 'bottleneck', '优化'],
security: ['安全', 'security', 'auth', 'permission', '权限'],
concept: ['概念', 'concept', 'theory', 'principle', '原理'],
comparison: ['比较', 'compare', 'vs', 'difference', '区别'],
decision: ['决策', 'decision', 'choice', 'tradeoff', '选择']
architecture: ['架构', 'architecture', 'design', 'structure', '设计', 'pattern'],
implementation: ['实现', 'implement', 'code', 'coding', '代码', 'logic'],
performance: ['性能', 'performance', 'optimize', 'bottleneck', '优化', 'speed'],
security: ['安全', 'security', 'auth', 'permission', '权限', 'vulnerability'],
concept: ['概念', 'concept', 'theory', 'principle', '原理', 'understand'],
comparison: ['比较', 'compare', 'vs', 'difference', '区别', 'versus'],
decision: ['决策', 'decision', 'choice', 'tradeoff', '选择', 'trade-off']
}
function identifyDimensions(topic) {
@@ -118,7 +126,7 @@ function identifyDimensions(topic) {
}
}
return matched.length > 0 ? matched : ['general']
return matched.length > 0 ? matched : ['architecture', 'implementation']
}
const dimensions = identifyDimensions("$TOPIC")
@@ -129,14 +137,12 @@ const dimensions = identifyDimensions("$TOPIC")
Ask user to scope the analysis:
- Focus areas: 代码实现 / 架构设计 / 最佳实践 / 问题诊断
- Analysis depth: Quick Overview / Standard Analysis / Deep Dive
- Analysis depth: 快速概览 / 标准分析 / 深度挖掘
#### Step 1.3: Create/Update discussion.md
For new session:
#### Step 1.3: Initialize discussion.md
```markdown
# Analysis Discussion
# Analysis Session
**Session ID**: ${sessionId}
**Topic**: $TOPIC
@@ -145,10 +151,17 @@ For new session:
---
## User Context
## Analysis Context
**Focus Areas**: ${userFocusAreas.join(', ')}
**Analysis Depth**: ${analysisDepth}
**Focus Areas**: ${focusAreas.join(', ')}
**Depth**: ${analysisDepth}
**Scope**: ${scope || 'Full codebase'}
---
## Initial Questions
${keyQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
---
@@ -156,90 +169,112 @@ For new session:
### Round 1 - Initial Understanding (${timestamp})
#### Topic Analysis
Based on topic "$TOPIC":
- **Primary dimensions**: ${dimensions.join(', ')}
- **Initial scope**: ${initialScope}
- **Key questions to explore**:
- ${question1}
- ${question2}
- ${question3}
#### Next Steps
- Search codebase for relevant patterns
- Gather insights via analysis
- Prepare discussion points for user
#### Key Questions
${keyQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
---
## Current Understanding
${initialUnderstanding}
```
For continue session, append:
```markdown
### Round ${n} - Continuation (${timestamp})
#### Previous Context
Resuming analysis based on prior discussion.
#### New Focus
${newFocusFromUser}
*To be populated after exploration phases*
```
---
### Phase 2: Exploration
### Phase 2: CLI Exploration (Serial)
#### Step 2.1: Codebase Search
#### Step 2.1: Codebase Context Gathering
Use built-in tools (no agent needed):
```javascript
// Extract keywords from topic
const keywords = extractTopicKeywords("$TOPIC")
// 1. Get project structure
const modules = bash("ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'")
// Search codebase for relevant code
const searchResults = []
for (const keyword of keywords) {
const results = Grep({ pattern: keyword, path: ".", output_mode: "content", "-C": 3 })
searchResults.push({ keyword, results })
// 2. Search for related code
const topicKeywords = extractKeywords("$TOPIC")
const relatedFiles = Grep({
pattern: topicKeywords.join('|'),
path: "src/",
output_mode: "files_with_matches"
})
// 3. Read project tech context
const projectTech = Read(".workflow/project-tech.json")
// Build exploration context
const explorationContext = {
relevant_files: relatedFiles.map(f => ({ path: f, relevance: 'high' })),
patterns: extractPatterns(modules),
constraints: projectTech?.constraints || [],
integration_points: projectTech?.integrations || []
}
// Identify affected files and patterns
const relevantLocations = analyzeSearchResults(searchResults)
Write(`${sessionFolder}/exploration-codebase.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationContext, null, 2))
```
#### Step 2.2: Pattern Analysis
#### Step 2.2: Gemini CLI Analysis
Analyze the codebase from identified dimensions:
**CLI Call** (synchronous):
```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Analyze '${topic}' from ${dimensions.join(', ')} perspectives
Success: Actionable insights with clear reasoning
1. Architecture patterns and structure
2. Implementation conventions
3. Dependency relationships
4. Potential issues or improvements
PRIOR CODEBASE CONTEXT:
- Key files: ${explorationContext.relevant_files.slice(0,5).map(f => f.path).join(', ')}
- Patterns found: ${explorationContext.patterns.slice(0,3).join(', ')}
- Constraints: ${explorationContext.constraints.slice(0,3).join(', ')}
TASK:
• Build on exploration findings above
• Analyze common patterns and anti-patterns
• Highlight potential issues or opportunities
• Generate discussion points for user clarification
• Provide 3-5 key insights with evidence
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* | Topic: $TOPIC
EXPECTED:
- Structured analysis with clear sections
- Specific insights tied to evidence (file:line references where applicable)
- Questions to deepen understanding
- Recommendations with rationale
- Confidence levels (high/medium/low) for each conclusion
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on ${dimensions.join(', ')} | Ignore test files
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```
**⏳ Wait for completion**
#### Step 2.3: Aggregate Findings
```javascript
// Aggregate into explorations.json
const explorations = {
session_id: sessionId,
timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
topic: "$TOPIC",
dimensions: dimensions,
sources: [
{ type: "codebase", summary: codebaseSummary },
{ type: "analysis", summary: analysisSummary }
{ type: 'codebase', summary: 'Project structure and related files' },
{ type: 'cli_analysis', summary: 'Gemini deep analysis' }
],
key_findings: [...],
discussion_points: [...],
open_questions: [...]
key_findings: [
// Populated from CLI analysis
],
discussion_points: [
// Questions for user engagement
],
open_questions: [
// Unresolved items
]
}
Write(explorationsPath, JSON.stringify(explorations, null, 2))
@@ -247,104 +282,194 @@ Write(explorationsPath, JSON.stringify(explorations, null, 2))
#### Step 2.4: Update discussion.md
```markdown
#### Exploration Results (${timestamp})
Append Round 2 section:
**Sources Analyzed**:
${sources.map(s => `- ${s.type}: ${s.summary}`).join('\n')}
```markdown
### Round 2 - Initial Exploration (${timestamp})
#### Codebase Findings
${explorationContext.relevant_files.slice(0,5).map(f => `- ${f.path}: ${f.relevance}`).join('\n')}
#### Analysis Results
**Key Findings**:
${keyFindings.map((f, i) => `${i+1}. ${f}`).join('\n')}
${keyFindings.map(f => `- 📍 ${f}`).join('\n')}
**Points for Discussion**:
${discussionPoints.map((p, i) => `${i+1}. ${p}`).join('\n')}
**Discussion Points**:
${discussionPoints.map(p => `- ❓ ${p}`).join('\n')}
**Open Questions**:
${openQuestions.map((q, i) => `- ${q}`).join('\n')}
**Recommendations**:
${recommendations.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n')}
---
```
---
### Phase 3: Interactive Discussion (Multi-Round)
### Phase 3: Interactive Discussion
#### Step 3.1: Present Findings & Gather Feedback
#### Step 3.1: Present & Gather Feedback
```javascript
// Maximum discussion rounds
const MAX_ROUNDS = 5
let roundNumber = 1
let discussionComplete = false
let roundNumber = 3
while (!discussionComplete && roundNumber <= MAX_ROUNDS) {
// Display current findings
while (!analysisComplete && roundNumber <= MAX_ROUNDS) {
// Present current findings
console.log(`
## Discussion Round ${roundNumber}
## Analysis Round ${roundNumber}
${currentFindings}
### Current Understanding
${currentUnderstanding}
### Key Points for Your Input
${discussionPoints.map((p, i) => `${i+1}. ${p}`).join('\n')}
### Key Questions Still Open
${openQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
### User Options:
- 继续深入: Deepen current direction
- 调整方向: Change analysis angle
- 有具体问题: Ask specific question
- 分析完成: Ready for synthesis
`)
// Gather user input
// Options:
// - 同意,继续深入: Deepen analysis in current direction
// - 需要调整方向: Get user's adjusted focus
// - 分析完成: Exit loop
// - 有具体问题: Answer specific questions
// User selects direction:
// - 继续深入: Deepen analysis in current direction
// - 调整方向: Change focus area
// - 有具体问题: Capture specific questions
// - 分析完成: Exit discussion loop
// Process user response and update understanding
updateDiscussionDocument(roundNumber, userResponse, findings)
roundNumber++
}
```
#### Step 3.2: Document Each Round
#### Step 3.2: Deepen Analysis
**CLI Call** (synchronous):
```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Deepen analysis on '${topic}' - more detailed investigation
Success: Comprehensive understanding with actionable insights
PRIOR FINDINGS:
${priorFindings.join('\n')}
DEEPEN ON:
${focusAreas.map(a => `- ${a}: ${details}`).join('\n')}
TASK:
• Elaborate on prior findings
• Investigate edge cases or special scenarios
• Identify patterns not yet discussed
• Suggest implementation or improvement approaches
• Rate risk/impact for each finding (1-5)
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/*
EXPECTED:
- Detailed breakdown of prior findings
- Risk/impact assessment
- Specific improvement suggestions
- Code examples or patterns where applicable
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```
#### Step 3.3: Adjust Direction
**CLI Call** (synchronous):
```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Analyze '${topic}' from different perspective: ${newFocus}
Success: Fresh insights from new angle
PRIOR ANALYSIS:
${priorAnalysis}
NEW FOCUS:
Shift emphasis to: ${newFocus}
TASK:
• Analyze topic from new perspective
• Identify what was missed in prior analysis
• Generate insights specific to new focus
• Cross-reference with prior findings
• Suggest next investigation steps
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/*
EXPECTED:
- New perspective insights
- Gaps in prior analysis
- Integrated view (prior + new)
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```
#### Step 3.4: Answer Specific Questions
**CLI Call** (synchronous):
```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Answer specific questions about '${topic}'
Success: Clear, evidence-based answers
QUESTIONS FROM USER:
${userQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
PRIOR CONTEXT:
${priorAnalysis}
TASK:
• Answer each question directly
• Provide evidence or examples
• Clarify any ambiguous points
• Suggest related investigation
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/*
EXPECTED:
- Direct answer to each question
- Supporting evidence
- Confidence level for each answer
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```
#### Step 3.5: Document Each Round
Append to discussion.md:
```markdown
### Round ${n} - Discussion (${timestamp})
### Round ${n} - ${action} (${timestamp})
#### User Input
#### User Direction
- **Action**: ${action}
- **Focus**: ${focus || 'Same as prior'}
${userInputSummary}
#### Analysis Results
${userResponse === 'adjustment' ? `
**Direction Adjustment**: ${adjustmentDetails}
` : ''}
**Key Findings**:
${newFindings.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n')}
${userResponse === 'questions' ? `
**User Questions**:
${userQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
**Insights**:
${insights.map(i => `- 💡 ${i}`).join('\n')}
**Answers**:
${answers.map((a, i) => `${i+1}. ${a}`).join('\n')}
` : ''}
#### Updated Understanding
Based on user feedback:
- ${insight1}
- ${insight2}
**Next Steps**:
${nextSteps.map(s => `${s.priority} - ${s.action}`).join('\n')}
#### Corrected Assumptions
${corrections.length > 0 ? corrections.map(c => `
- ~~${c.wrong}~~ → ${c.corrected}
- Reason: ${c.reason}
`).join('\n') : 'None'}
#### New Insights
${newInsights.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')}
${corrections.map(c => `- ~~${c.before}~~ → ${c.after}`).join('\n')}
```
---
### Phase 4: Synthesis & Conclusion
#### Step 4.1: Consolidate Insights
#### Step 4.1: Final Synthesis
```javascript
const conclusions = {
@@ -353,21 +478,20 @@ const conclusions = {
completed: getUtc8ISOString(),
total_rounds: roundNumber,
summary: "...",
summary: executiveSummary,
key_conclusions: [
{ point: "...", evidence: "...", confidence: "high|medium|low" }
{ point: '...', evidence: '...', confidence: 'high|medium|low' }
],
recommendations: [
{ action: "...", rationale: "...", priority: "high|medium|low" }
{ action: '...', rationale: '...', priority: 'high|medium|low' }
],
open_questions: [...],
open_questions: remainingQuestions,
follow_up_suggestions: [
{ type: "issue", summary: "..." },
{ type: "task", summary: "..." }
{ type: 'issue|task|research', summary: '...' }
]
}
@@ -379,164 +503,108 @@ Write(conclusionsPath, JSON.stringify(conclusions, null, 2))
```markdown
---
## Conclusions (${timestamp})
## Synthesis & Conclusions (${timestamp})
### Summary
${summaryParagraph}
### Executive Summary
${summary}
### Key Conclusions
${conclusions.key_conclusions.map((c, i) => `
${keyConclusions.map((c, i) => `
${i+1}. **${c.point}** (Confidence: ${c.confidence})
- Evidence: ${c.evidence}
Evidence: ${c.evidence}
`).join('\n')}
### Recommendations
${conclusions.recommendations.map((r, i) => `
${i+1}. **${r.action}** (Priority: ${r.priority})
- Rationale: ${r.rationale}
${recommendations.map((r, i) => `
${i+1}. **[${r.priority}]** ${r.action}
Rationale: ${r.rationale}
`).join('\n')}
### Remaining Questions
### Remaining Open Questions
${conclusions.open_questions.map(q => `- ${q}`).join('\n')}
${openQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
---
## Current Understanding (Final)
### What We Established
${established.map(p => `- ✅ ${p}`).join('\n')}
${establishedPoints.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n')}
### What Was Clarified/Corrected
${corrections.map(c => `- ~~${c.original}~~ → ${c.corrected}`).join('\n')}
### What Was Clarified
${clarified.map(c => `- ~~${c.before}~~ → ${c.after}`).join('\n')}
### Key Insights
${keyInsights.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')}
${insights.map(i => `- 💡 ${i}`).join('\n')}
---
## Session Statistics
- **Total Rounds**: ${totalRounds}
- **Duration**: ${duration}
- **Sources Used**: ${sources.join(', ')}
- **Artifacts Generated**: discussion.md, explorations.json, conclusions.json
- **Key Findings**: ${keyFindings.length}
- **Dimensions Analyzed**: ${dimensions.join(', ')}
- **Artifacts**: discussion.md, exploration-codebase.json, explorations.json, conclusions.json
```
#### Step 4.3: Post-Completion Options
Offer follow-up options:
- Create Issue: Convert conclusions to actionable issues
- Generate Task: Create implementation tasks
- Export Report: Generate standalone analysis report
- Complete: No further action needed
- Create Issue (for findings)
- Generate Task (for improvements)
- Export Report
- Complete
---
## Session Folder Structure
## Configuration
```
.workflow/.analysis/ANL-{slug}-{date}/
├── discussion.md # Evolution of understanding & discussions
├── explorations.json # Exploration findings
├── conclusions.json # Final synthesis
└── exploration-*.json # Individual exploration results (optional)
```
### Analysis Dimensions
## Discussion Document Template
| Dimension | Keywords |
|-----------|----------|
| architecture | 架构, architecture, design, structure, 设计 |
| implementation | 实现, implement, code, coding, 代码 |
| performance | 性能, performance, optimize, bottleneck, 优化 |
| security | 安全, security, auth, permission, 权限 |
| concept | 概念, concept, theory, principle, 原理 |
| comparison | 比较, compare, vs, difference, 区别 |
| decision | 决策, decision, choice, tradeoff, 选择 |
```markdown
# Analysis Discussion
### Depth Settings
**Session ID**: ANL-xxx-2025-01-25
**Topic**: [topic or question]
**Started**: 2025-01-25T10:00:00+08:00
**Dimensions**: [architecture, implementation, ...]
| Depth | Time | Scope | Questions |
|-------|------|-------|-----------|
| Quick (10-15min) | 1-2 | Surface level | 3-5 key |
| Standard (30-60min) | 2-4 | Moderate depth | 5-8 key |
| Deep (1-2hr) | 4+ | Comprehensive | 10+ key |
---
## User Context
## Error Handling
**Focus Areas**: [user-selected focus]
**Analysis Depth**: [quick|standard|deep]
| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| CLI timeout | Retry with shorter prompt, skip analysis |
| No relevant findings | Broaden search, adjust keywords |
| User disengaged | Summarize progress, offer break point |
| Max rounds reached | Force synthesis, highlight remaining questions |
| Session folder conflict | Append timestamp suffix |
---
## Discussion Timeline
### Round 1 - Initial Understanding (2025-01-25 10:00)
#### Topic Analysis
...
#### Exploration Results
...
### Round 2 - Discussion (2025-01-25 10:15)
#### User Input
...
#### Updated Understanding
...
#### Corrected Assumptions
- ~~[wrong]~~ → [corrected]
### Round 3 - Deep Dive (2025-01-25 10:30)
...
---
## Conclusions (2025-01-25 11:00)
### Summary
...
### Key Conclusions
...
### Recommendations
...
---
## Current Understanding (Final)
### What We Established
- [confirmed points]
### What Was Clarified/Corrected
- ~~[original assumption]~~ → [corrected understanding]
### Key Insights
- [insights gained]
---
## Session Statistics
- **Total Rounds**: 3
- **Duration**: 1 hour
- **Sources Used**: codebase exploration, analysis
- **Artifacts Generated**: discussion.md, explorations.json, conclusions.json
```
## Iteration Flow
```
First Call (TOPIC="topic"):
├─ No session exists → New mode
├─ Identify analysis dimensions
├─ Identify dimensions
├─ Scope with user
├─ Create discussion.md with initial understanding
├─ Launch explorations
├─ Create discussion.md
├─ Codebase exploration
├─ Gemini CLI analysis
└─ Enter discussion loop
Continue Call (TOPIC="topic"):
@@ -549,10 +617,10 @@ Discussion Loop:
├─ Present current findings
├─ Gather user feedback
├─ Process response:
│ ├─ Agree → Deepen analysis
│ ├─ Adjust → Change direction
│ ├─ Question → Answer then continue
│ └─ Complete → Exit loop
│ ├─ Deepen → Deeper analysis on same topic
│ ├─ Adjust → Shift analysis focus
│ ├─ Questions → Answer specific questions
│ └─ Complete → Exit loop for synthesis
├─ Update discussion.md
└─ Repeat until complete or max rounds
@@ -562,49 +630,6 @@ Completion:
└─ Offer follow-up options
```
## Consolidation Rules
When updating "Current Understanding":
1. **Promote confirmed insights**: Move validated findings to "What We Established"
2. **Track corrections**: Keep important wrong→right transformations
3. **Focus on current state**: What do we know NOW
4. **Avoid timeline repetition**: Don't copy discussion details
5. **Preserve key learnings**: Keep insights valuable for future reference
**Bad (cluttered)**:
```markdown
## Current Understanding
In round 1 we discussed X, then in round 2 user said Y, and we explored Z...
```
**Good (consolidated)**:
```markdown
## Current Understanding
### What We Established
- The authentication flow uses JWT with refresh tokens
- Rate limiting is implemented at API gateway level
### What Was Clarified
- ~~Assumed Redis for sessions~~ → Actually uses database-backed sessions
### Key Insights
- Current architecture supports horizontal scaling
- Security audit recommended before production
```
## Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Exploration fails | Continue with available context, note limitation |
| User timeout in discussion | Save state, show resume instructions |
| Max rounds reached | Force synthesis, offer continuation option |
| No relevant findings | Broaden search, ask user for clarification |
| Session folder conflict | Append timestamp suffix |
---
**Now execute the analyze-with-file workflow for topic**: $TOPIC
**Now execute the analysis-with-file workflow for topic**: $TOPIC

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,549 @@
---
description: Serial collaborative planning with Plan Note - Single-agent sequential task generation, unified plan-note.md, conflict detection. Codex-optimized.
argument-hint: "TASK=\"<description>\" [--max-domains=5] [--focus=<domain>]"
---
# Codex Collaborative-Plan-With-File Prompt
## Overview
Serial collaborative planning workflow using **Plan Note** architecture:
1. **Understanding**: Analyze requirements and identify 2-5 sub-domains
2. **Sequential Planning**: Process each sub-domain sequentially, generating plan.json + updating plan-note.md
3. **Conflict Detection**: Scan plan-note.md for conflicts
4. **Completion**: Generate executable plan.md summary
**Note**: Codex does not support parallel agent execution. All domains processed serially.
## Target Task
**$TASK**
**Parameters**:
- `--max-domains`: Maximum sub-domains to identify (default: 5)
- `--focus`: Focus specific domain (optional)
## Execution Process
```
Session Detection:
├─ Check if planning session exists for task
├─ EXISTS + plan-note.md exists → Continue mode
└─ NOT_FOUND → New session mode
Phase 1: Understanding & Template Creation
├─ Analyze task description (Glob/Grep/Bash)
├─ Identify 2-5 sub-domains
├─ Create plan-note.md template
└─ Generate requirement-analysis.json
Phase 2: Sequential Sub-Domain Planning (Serial)
├─ For each sub-domain (LOOP):
│ ├─ Gemini CLI: Generate detailed plan
│ ├─ Extract task summary
│ └─ Update plan-note.md section
└─ Complete all domains sequentially
Phase 3: Conflict Detection
├─ Parse plan-note.md
├─ Extract all tasks from all sections
├─ Detect file/dependency/strategy conflicts
└─ Update conflict markers in plan-note.md
Phase 4: Completion
├─ Generate conflicts.json
├─ Generate plan.md summary
└─ Ready for execution
Output:
├─ .workflow/.planning/{slug}-{date}/plan-note.md (executable)
├─ .workflow/.planning/{slug}-{date}/requirement-analysis.json (metadata)
├─ .workflow/.planning/{slug}-{date}/conflicts.json (conflict report)
├─ .workflow/.planning/{slug}-{date}/plan.md (human-readable)
└─ .workflow/.planning/{slug}-{date}/agents/{domain}/plan.json (detailed)
```
## Output Structure
```
.workflow/.planning/CPLAN-{slug}-{date}/
├── plan-note.md # ⭐ Core: Requirements + Tasks + Conflicts
├── requirement-analysis.json # Phase 1: Sub-domain assignments
├── agents/ # Phase 2: Per-domain plans (serial)
│ ├── {domain-1}/
│ │ └── plan.json # Detailed plan
│ ├── {domain-2}/
│ │ └── plan.json
│ └── ...
├── conflicts.json # Phase 3: Conflict report
└── plan.md # Phase 4: Human-readable summary
```
---
## Implementation Details
### Session Setup
```javascript
const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
const taskSlug = "$TASK".toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+/g, '-').substring(0, 30)
const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
const sessionId = `CPLAN-${taskSlug}-${dateStr}`
const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.planning/${sessionId}`
const planNotePath = `${sessionFolder}/plan-note.md`
const requirementsPath = `${sessionFolder}/requirement-analysis.json`
const conflictsPath = `${sessionFolder}/conflicts.json`
const planPath = `${sessionFolder}/plan.md`
// Auto-detect mode
const sessionExists = fs.existsSync(sessionFolder)
const hasPlanNote = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(planNotePath)
const mode = hasPlanNote ? 'continue' : 'new'
if (!sessionExists) {
bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/agents`)
}
```
---
### Phase 1: Understanding & Template Creation
#### Step 1.1: Analyze Task Description
Use built-in tools (no agent):
```javascript
// 1. Extract task keywords
const taskKeywords = extractKeywords("$TASK")
// 2. Identify sub-domains via analysis
// Example: "Implement real-time notification system"
// → Domains: [Backend API, Frontend UI, Notification Service, Data Storage, Testing]
const subDomains = identifySubDomains("$TASK", {
maxDomains: 5, // --max-domains parameter
keywords: taskKeywords
})
// 3. Estimate scope
const complexity = assessComplexity("$TASK")
```
#### Step 1.2: Create plan-note.md Template
Generate structured template:
```markdown
---
session_id: ${sessionId}
original_requirement: |
$TASK
created_at: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
complexity: ${complexity}
sub_domains: ${subDomains.map(d => d.name).join(', ')}
status: in_progress
---
# 协作规划
**Session ID**: ${sessionId}
**任务**: $TASK
**复杂度**: ${complexity}
**创建时间**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
---
## 需求理解
### 核心目标
${extractObjectives("$TASK")}
### 关键要点
${extractKeyPoints("$TASK")}
### 约束条件
${extractConstraints("$TASK")}
### 拆分策略
${subDomains.length} 个子领域:
${subDomains.map((d, i) => `${i+1}. **${d.name}**: ${d.description}`).join('\n')}
---
## 任务池 - ${subDomains[0].name}
*(TASK-001 ~ TASK-100)*
*待由规划流程填充*
---
## 任务池 - ${subDomains[1].name}
*(TASK-101 ~ TASK-200)*
*待由规划流程填充*
---
## 依赖关系
*所有子域规划完成后自动生成*
---
## 冲突标记
*冲突检测阶段生成*
---
## 上下文证据 - ${subDomains[0].name}
*相关文件、现有模式、约束等*
---
## 上下文证据 - ${subDomains[1].name}
*相关文件、现有模式、约束等*
---
```
#### Step 1.3: Generate requirement-analysis.json
```javascript
const requirements = {
session_id: sessionId,
original_requirement: "$TASK",
complexity: complexity,
sub_domains: subDomains.map((domain, index) => ({
focus_area: domain.name,
description: domain.description,
task_id_range: [index * 100 + 1, (index + 1) * 100],
estimated_effort: domain.effort,
dependencies: domain.dependencies || []
})),
total_domains: subDomains.length
}
Write(requirementsPath, JSON.stringify(requirements, null, 2))
```
---
### Phase 2: Sequential Sub-Domain Planning
#### Step 2.1: Plan Each Domain Sequentially
```javascript
for (let i = 0; i < subDomains.length; i++) {
const domain = subDomains[i]
const domainFolder = `${sessionFolder}/agents/${domain.slug}`
const domainPlanPath = `${domainFolder}/plan.json`
console.log(`Planning Domain ${i+1}/${subDomains.length}: ${domain.name}`)
// Execute Gemini CLI for this domain
// ⏳ Wait for completion before proceeding to next domain
}
```
#### Step 2.2: CLI Planning for Current Domain
**CLI Call** (synchronous):
```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Generate detailed implementation plan for domain '${domain.name}' in task: $TASK
Success: Comprehensive task breakdown with clear dependencies and effort estimates
DOMAIN CONTEXT:
- Focus Area: ${domain.name}
- Description: ${domain.description}
- Task ID Range: ${domain.task_id_range[0]}-${domain.task_id_range[1]}
- Related Domains: ${relatedDomains.join(', ')}
PRIOR DOMAINS (if any):
${completedDomains.map(d => `- ${d.name}: ${completedTaskCount} tasks`).join('\n')}
TASK:
• Analyze ${domain.name} in detail
• Identify all necessary tasks (use TASK-ID range: ${domain.task_id_range[0]}-${domain.task_id_range[1]})
• Define task dependencies and order
• Estimate effort and complexity for each task
• Identify file modifications needed
• Assess conflict risks with other domains
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/*
EXPECTED:
JSON output with:
- tasks[]: {id, title, description, complexity, depends_on[], files_to_modify[], conflict_risk}
- summary: Overview of domain plan
- interdependencies: Links to other domains
- total_effort: Estimated effort points
OUTPUT FORMAT: Structured JSON
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```
#### Step 2.3: Parse and Update plan-note.md
After CLI completes for each domain:
```javascript
// Parse CLI output
const planJson = parseCLIOutput(cliResult)
// Save detailed plan
Write(domainPlanPath, JSON.stringify(planJson, null, 2))
// Extract task summary
const taskSummary = planJson.tasks.map((t, idx) => `
### TASK-${t.id}: ${t.title} [${domain.slug}]
**状态**: 规划中
**复杂度**: ${t.complexity}
**依赖**: ${t.depends_on.length > 0 ? t.depends_on.map(d => `TASK-${d}`).join(', ') : 'None'}
**范围**: ${t.description}
**修改点**:
${t.files_to_modify.map(f => `- \`${f.path}:${f.line_range}\`: ${f.summary}`).join('\n')}
**冲突风险**: ${t.conflict_risk}
`).join('\n')
// Update plan-note.md
updatePlanNoteSection(
planNotePath,
`## 任务池 - ${domain.name}`,
taskSummary
)
// Extract evidence
const evidence = `
**相关文件**:
${planJson.related_files.map(f => `- ${f.path}: ${f.relevance}`).join('\n')}
**现有模式**:
${planJson.existing_patterns.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n')}
**约束**:
${planJson.constraints.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}
`
updatePlanNoteSection(
planNotePath,
`## 上下文证据 - ${domain.name}`,
evidence
)
```
#### Step 2.4: Process All Domains
```javascript
const completedDomains = []
for (const domain of subDomains) {
// Step 2.2: CLI call (synchronous)
const cliResult = executeCLI(domain)
// Step 2.3: Parse and update
updatePlanNoteFromCLI(domain, cliResult)
completedDomains.push(domain)
console.log(`✅ Completed: ${domain.name}`)
}
```
---
### Phase 3: Conflict Detection
#### Step 3.1: Parse plan-note.md
```javascript
const planContent = Read(planNotePath)
const sections = parsePlanNoteSections(planContent)
const allTasks = []
// Extract tasks from all domains
for (const section of sections) {
if (section.heading.includes('任务池')) {
const tasks = extractTasks(section.content)
allTasks.push(...tasks)
}
}
```
#### Step 3.2: Detect Conflicts
```javascript
const conflicts = []
// 1. File conflicts
const fileMap = new Map()
for (const task of allTasks) {
for (const file of task.files_to_modify) {
const key = `${file.path}:${file.line_range}`
if (!fileMap.has(key)) fileMap.set(key, [])
fileMap.get(key).push(task)
}
}
for (const [location, tasks] of fileMap.entries()) {
if (tasks.length > 1) {
const agents = new Set(tasks.map(t => t.domain))
if (agents.size > 1) {
conflicts.push({
type: 'file_conflict',
severity: 'high',
location: location,
tasks_involved: tasks.map(t => t.id),
agents_involved: Array.from(agents),
description: `Multiple domains modifying: ${location}`,
suggested_resolution: 'Coordinate modification order'
})
}
}
}
// 2. Dependency cycles
const depGraph = buildDependencyGraph(allTasks)
const cycles = detectCycles(depGraph)
for (const cycle of cycles) {
conflicts.push({
type: 'dependency_cycle',
severity: 'critical',
tasks_involved: cycle,
description: `Circular dependency: ${cycle.join(' → ')}`,
suggested_resolution: 'Remove or reorganize dependencies'
})
}
// Write conflicts.json
Write(conflictsPath, JSON.stringify({
detected_at: getUtc8ISOString(),
total_conflicts: conflicts.length,
conflicts: conflicts
}, null, 2))
```
#### Step 3.3: Update plan-note.md
```javascript
const conflictMarkdown = generateConflictMarkdown(conflicts)
updatePlanNoteSection(
planNotePath,
'## 冲突标记',
conflictMarkdown
)
```
---
### Phase 4: Completion
#### Step 4.1: Generate plan.md
```markdown
# 实现计划
**Session**: ${sessionId}
**任务**: $TASK
**创建**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
---
## 需求
${copySection(planNotePath, '## 需求理解')}
---
## 子领域拆分
${subDomains.map((domain, i) => `
### ${i+1}. ${domain.name}
- **描述**: ${domain.description}
- **任务范围**: TASK-${domain.task_id_range[0]} ~ TASK-${domain.task_id_range[1]}
- **预估工作量**: ${domain.effort}
`).join('\n')}
---
## 任务概览
${allTasks.map(t => `
### ${t.id}: ${t.title}
- **复杂度**: ${t.complexity}
- **依赖**: ${t.depends_on.length > 0 ? t.depends_on.join(', ') : 'None'}
- **文件**: ${t.files_to_modify.map(f => f.path).join(', ')}
`).join('\n')}
---
## 冲突报告
${conflicts.length > 0
? `检测到 ${conflicts.length} 个冲突:\n${copySection(planNotePath, '## 冲突标记')}`
: '✅ 无冲突检测到'}
---
## 执行指令
\`\`\`bash
/workflow:unified-execute-with-file ${planPath}
\`\`\`
```
#### Step 4.2: Write Summary
```javascript
Write(planPath, planMarkdown)
```
---
## Configuration
### Sub-Domain Identification
Common domain patterns:
- Backend API: "服务", "后端", "API", "接口"
- Frontend: "界面", "前端", "UI", "视图"
- Database: "数据", "存储", "数据库", "持久化"
- Testing: "测试", "验证", "QA"
- Infrastructure: "部署", "基础", "运维", "配置"
---
## Error Handling
| Error | Resolution |
|-------|------------|
| CLI timeout | Retry with shorter prompt |
| No tasks generated | Review domain description, retry |
| Section not found | Recreate section in plan-note.md |
| Conflict detection fails | Continue with empty conflicts |
---
## Best Practices
1. **Clear Task Description**: Detailed requirements → better sub-domains
2. **Review plan-note.md**: Check before moving to next phase
3. **Resolve Conflicts**: Address before execution
4. **Inspect Details**: Review agents/{domain}/plan.json for specifics
---
**Now execute collaborative-plan-with-file for**: $TASK

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff