feat(codex): add parallel execution workflows with worktree support

Add three new workflow commands for parallel development:

- collaborative-plan-parallel.md: Planning with execution group assignment
  - Supports automatic/balanced/manual group assignment strategies
  - Assigns codex instances and branch names per group
  - Detects cross-group conflicts and dependencies

- unified-execute-parallel.md: Worktree-based group execution
  - Executes tasks in isolated Git worktrees (.ccw/worktree/{group-id}/)
  - Enables true parallel execution across multiple codex instances
  - Simplified focus on execution only

- worktree-merge.md: Dependency-aware worktree merging
  - Merges completed worktrees in dependency order
  - Handles cross-group file conflicts
  - Optional worktree cleanup after merge

Key improvements:
- True parallel development via Git worktrees (vs branch switching)
- Clear separation of concerns (plan → execute → merge)
- Support for multi-codex coordination
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-02-03 21:17:45 +08:00
parent a8385e2ea5
commit bb4cd0529e
3 changed files with 1569 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,742 @@
---
description: Parallel collaborative planning with Execution Groups - Multi-codex parallel task generation, execution group assignment, multi-branch strategy. Codex-optimized.
argument-hint: "TASK=\"<description>\" [--max-groups=3] [--group-strategy=automatic|balanced|manual] [--focus=<domain>]"
---
# Codex Collaborative-Plan-Parallel Workflow
## Quick Start
Parallel collaborative planning workflow using **Execution Groups** architecture. Splits task into sub-domains, assigns them to execution groups, and prepares for multi-branch parallel development.
**Core workflow**: Understand → Group Assignment → Sequential Planning → Conflict Detection → Execution Strategy
**Key features**:
- **Execution Groups**: Sub-domains grouped for parallel execution by different codex instances
- **Multi-branch strategy**: Each execution group works on independent Git branch
- **Codex instance assignment**: Each group assigned to specific codex worker
- **Dependency-aware grouping**: Automatic or manual group assignment based on dependencies
- **plan-note.md**: Shared document with execution group sections
**Note**: Planning is still serial (Codex limitation), but output is structured for parallel execution.
## Overview
This workflow enables structured planning for parallel execution:
1. **Understanding & Group Assignment** - Analyze requirements, identify sub-domains, assign to execution groups
2. **Sequential Planning** - Process each sub-domain serially via CLI analysis (planning phase only)
3. **Conflict Detection** - Scan for conflicts across execution groups
4. **Execution Strategy** - Generate branch strategy and codex assignment for parallel execution
The key innovation is **Execution Groups** - sub-domains are grouped by dependencies and complexity, enabling true parallel development with multiple codex instances.
## Output Structure
```
.workflow/.planning/CPLAN-{slug}-{date}/
├── plan-note.md # ⭐ Core: Requirements + Groups + Tasks
├── requirement-analysis.json # Phase 1: Sub-domain + group assignments
├── execution-groups.json # ⭐ Phase 1: Group metadata + codex assignment
├── agents/ # Phase 2: Per-domain plans (serial planning)
│ ├── {domain-1}/
│ │ └── plan.json
│ ├── {domain-2}/
│ │ └── plan.json
│ └── ...
├── conflicts.json # Phase 3: Conflict report
├── execution-strategy.md # ⭐ Phase 4: Branch strategy + codex commands
└── plan.md # Phase 4: Human-readable summary
```
## Output Artifacts
### Phase 1: Understanding & Group Assignment
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `plan-note.md` | Collaborative template with execution group sections |
| `requirement-analysis.json` | Sub-domain assignments with group IDs |
| `execution-groups.json` | ⭐ Group metadata, codex assignment, branch names, dependencies |
### Phase 2: Sequential Planning (per Phase 1 in original)
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `agents/{domain}/plan.json` | Detailed implementation plan per domain |
| Updated `plan-note.md` | Task pool and evidence sections filled per domain |
### Phase 3: Conflict Detection (same as original)
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `conflicts.json` | Detected conflicts with types, severity, resolutions |
| Updated `plan-note.md` | Conflict markers section populated |
### Phase 4: Execution Strategy Generation
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `execution-strategy.md` | ⭐ Branch creation commands, codex execution commands per group, merge strategy |
| `plan.md` | Human-readable summary with execution groups |
---
## Implementation Details
### Session Initialization
The workflow automatically generates a unique session identifier and directory structure.
**Session ID Format**: `CPLAN-{slug}-{date}`
- `slug`: Lowercase alphanumeric, max 30 chars
- `date`: YYYY-MM-DD format (UTC+8)
**Session Directory**: `.workflow/.planning/{sessionId}/`
**Auto-Detection**: If session folder exists with plan-note.md, automatically enters continue mode.
**Session Variables**:
- `sessionId`: Unique session identifier
- `sessionFolder`: Base directory for all artifacts
- `maxGroups`: Maximum execution groups (default: 3)
- `groupStrategy`: automatic | balanced | manual (default: automatic)
---
## Phase 1: Understanding & Group Assignment
**Objective**: Analyze task requirements, identify sub-domains, assign to execution groups, and create the plan-note.md template.
### Step 1.1: Analyze Task Description
Use built-in tools to understand the task scope and identify sub-domains.
**Analysis Activities**:
1. **Extract task keywords** - Identify key terms and concepts
2. **Identify sub-domains** - Split into 2-8 parallelizable focus areas
3. **Analyze dependencies** - Map cross-domain dependencies
4. **Assess complexity** - Evaluate task complexity per domain (Low/Medium/High)
5. **Search for references** - Find related documentation, README, architecture guides
**Sub-Domain Identification Patterns**:
| Pattern | Keywords | Typical Group Assignment |
|---------|----------|--------------------------|
| Backend API | 服务, 后端, API, 接口 | Group with database if dependent |
| Frontend | 界面, 前端, UI, 视图 | Separate group (UI-focused) |
| Database | 数据, 存储, 数据库, 持久化 | Group with backend if tightly coupled |
| Testing | 测试, 验证, QA | Can be separate or split across groups |
| Infrastructure | 部署, 基础, 运维, 配置 | Usually separate group |
### Step 1.2: Assign Execution Groups
Assign sub-domains to execution groups based on strategy.
**Group Assignment Strategies**:
#### 1. Automatic Strategy (default)
- **Logic**: Group domains by dependency relationships
- **Rule**: Domains with direct dependencies → same group
- **Rule**: Independent domains → separate groups (up to maxGroups)
- **Example**:
- Group 1: backend-api + database (dependent)
- Group 2: frontend + ui-components (dependent)
- Group 3: testing + documentation (independent)
#### 2. Balanced Strategy
- **Logic**: Distribute domains evenly across groups by estimated effort
- **Rule**: Balance total complexity across groups
- **Example**:
- Group 1: frontend (high) + testing (low)
- Group 2: backend (high) + documentation (low)
- Group 3: database (medium) + infrastructure (medium)
#### 3. Manual Strategy
- **Logic**: Prompt user to manually assign domains to groups
- **UI**: Present domains with dependencies, ask for group assignments
- **Validation**: Check that dependencies are within same group or properly ordered
**Codex Instance Assignment**:
- Each group assigned to `codex-{N}` (e.g., codex-1, codex-2, codex-3)
- Instance names are logical identifiers for parallel execution
- Actual parallel execution happens in unified-execute-parallel workflow
### Step 1.3: Generate execution-groups.json
Create the execution group metadata document.
**execution-groups.json Structure**:
```json
{
"session_id": "CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03",
"total_groups": 3,
"group_strategy": "automatic",
"groups": [
{
"group_id": "EG-001",
"codex_instance": "codex-1",
"domains": ["frontend", "ui-components"],
"branch_name": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend",
"estimated_effort": "high",
"task_id_range": "TASK-001~200",
"dependencies_on_groups": [],
"cross_group_files": []
},
{
"group_id": "EG-002",
"codex_instance": "codex-2",
"domains": ["backend-api", "database"],
"branch_name": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend",
"estimated_effort": "medium",
"task_id_range": "TASK-201~400",
"dependencies_on_groups": [],
"cross_group_files": []
},
{
"group_id": "EG-003",
"codex_instance": "codex-3",
"domains": ["testing"],
"branch_name": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing",
"estimated_effort": "low",
"task_id_range": "TASK-401~500",
"dependencies_on_groups": ["EG-001", "EG-002"],
"cross_group_files": []
}
],
"inter_group_dependencies": [
{
"from_group": "EG-003",
"to_group": "EG-001",
"dependency_type": "requires_completion",
"description": "Testing requires frontend implementation"
},
{
"from_group": "EG-003",
"to_group": "EG-002",
"dependency_type": "requires_completion",
"description": "Testing requires backend API"
}
]
}
```
**Field Descriptions**:
| Field | Purpose |
|-------|---------|
| `group_id` | Unique execution group identifier (EG-001, EG-002, ...) |
| `codex_instance` | Logical codex worker name for parallel execution |
| `domains[]` | Sub-domains assigned to this group |
| `branch_name` | Git branch name for this group's work |
| `estimated_effort` | Complexity: low/medium/high |
| `task_id_range` | Non-overlapping TASK ID range (200 IDs per group) |
| `dependencies_on_groups[]` | Groups that must complete before this group starts |
| `cross_group_files[]` | Files modified by multiple groups (conflict risk) |
| `inter_group_dependencies[]` | Explicit cross-group dependency relationships |
### Step 1.4: Create plan-note.md Template with Groups
Generate structured template with execution group sections.
**plan-note.md Structure**:
- **YAML Frontmatter**: session_id, original_requirement, total_groups, group_strategy, status
- **Section: 需求理解**: Core objectives, key points, constraints, group strategy
- **Section: 执行组划分**: Table of groups with domains, branches, codex assignments
- **Section: 任务池 - {Group ID} - {Domains}**: Pre-allocated task section per execution group
- **Section: 依赖关系**: Cross-group dependencies
- **Section: 冲突标记**: Populated in Phase 3
- **Section: 上下文证据 - {Group ID}**: Evidence section per execution group
**TASK ID Range Allocation**: Each group receives 200 non-overlapping IDs (e.g., Group 1: TASK-001~200, Group 2: TASK-201~400).
### Step 1.5: Update requirement-analysis.json with Groups
Extend requirement-analysis.json to include execution group assignments.
**requirement-analysis.json Structure** (extended):
```json
{
"session_id": "CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03",
"original_requirement": "...",
"complexity": "high",
"total_groups": 3,
"group_strategy": "automatic",
"sub_domains": [
{
"focus_area": "frontend",
"description": "...",
"execution_group": "EG-001",
"task_id_range": "TASK-001~100",
"estimated_effort": "high",
"dependencies": []
},
{
"focus_area": "ui-components",
"description": "...",
"execution_group": "EG-001",
"task_id_range": "TASK-101~200",
"estimated_effort": "medium",
"dependencies": ["frontend"]
}
],
"execution_groups_summary": [
{
"group_id": "EG-001",
"domains": ["frontend", "ui-components"],
"total_estimated_effort": "high"
}
]
}
```
**Success Criteria**:
- 2-3 execution groups identified (up to maxGroups)
- Each group has 1-4 sub-domains
- Dependencies mapped (intra-group and inter-group)
- execution-groups.json created with complete metadata
- plan-note.md template includes group sections
- requirement-analysis.json extended with group assignments
- Branch names generated for each group
- Codex instance assigned to each group
---
## Phase 2: Sequential Sub-Domain Planning
**Objective**: Process each sub-domain serially via CLI analysis (same as original workflow, but with group awareness).
**Note**: This phase is identical to original collaborative-plan-with-file Phase 2, with the following additions:
- CLI prompt includes execution group context
- Task IDs respect group's assigned range
- Cross-group dependencies explicitly documented
### Step 2.1: Domain Planning Loop (Serial)
For each sub-domain in sequence:
1. Execute Gemini/Codex CLI analysis for the current domain
2. Include execution group metadata in CLI context
3. Parse CLI output into structured plan
4. Save detailed plan as `agents/{domain}/plan.json`
5. Update plan-note.md group section with task summaries and evidence
**Planning Guideline**: Wait for each domain's CLI analysis to complete before proceeding.
### Step 2.2: CLI Planning with Group Context
Execute synchronous CLI analysis with execution group awareness.
**CLI Analysis Scope** (extended):
- **PURPOSE**: Generate detailed implementation plan for domain within execution group
- **CONTEXT**:
- Domain description
- Execution group ID and metadata
- Related codebase files
- Prior domain results within same group
- Cross-group dependencies (if any)
- **TASK**: Analyze domain, identify tasks within group's ID range, define dependencies
- **EXPECTED**: JSON output with tasks, summaries, group-aware dependencies, effort estimates
- **CONSTRAINTS**:
- Use only TASK IDs from assigned range
- Document any cross-group dependencies
- Flag files that might be modified by other groups
**Cross-Group Dependency Handling**:
- If a task depends on another group's completion, document as `depends_on_group: "EG-XXX"`
- Mark files that are likely modified by multiple groups as `cross_group_risk: true`
### Step 2.3: Update plan-note.md Group Sections
Parse CLI output and update the plan-note.md sections for the current domain's group.
**Task Summary Format** (extended with group info):
- Task header: `### TASK-{ID}: {Title} [{domain}] [Group: {group_id}]`
- Fields: 状态, 复杂度, 依赖, 范围, **执行组** (execution_group)
- Cross-group dependencies: `依赖执行组: EG-XXX`
- Modification points with conflict risk flag
- Conflict risk assessment
**Evidence Format** (same as original)
**Success Criteria**:
- All domains processed sequentially
- `agents/{domain}/plan.json` created for each domain
- `plan-note.md` updated with group-aware task pools
- Cross-group dependencies explicitly documented
- Task IDs respect group ranges
---
## Phase 3: Conflict Detection
**Objective**: Analyze plan-note.md for conflicts within and across execution groups.
**Note**: This phase extends original conflict detection with group-aware analysis.
### Step 3.1: Parse plan-note.md (same as original)
Extract all tasks from all group sections.
### Step 3.2: Detect Conflicts (Extended)
Scan all tasks for four categories of conflicts (added cross-group conflicts).
**Conflict Types** (extended):
| Type | Severity | Detection Logic | Resolution |
|------|----------|-----------------|------------|
| file_conflict | high | Same file:location modified by multiple domains within same group | Coordinate modification order |
| cross_group_file_conflict | critical | Same file modified by multiple execution groups | Requires merge coordination or branch rebase strategy |
| dependency_cycle | critical | Circular dependencies in task graph (within or across groups) | Remove or reorganize dependencies |
| strategy_conflict | medium | Multiple high-risk tasks in same file from different domains/groups | Review approaches and align on strategy |
**Detection Activities**:
1. **File Conflicts (Intra-Group)**: Group modification points by file:location within each group
2. **Cross-Group File Conflicts**: Identify files modified by multiple execution groups
3. **Dependency Cycles**: Build dependency graph including cross-group dependencies, detect cycles
4. **Strategy Conflicts**: Identify files with high-risk tasks from multiple groups
**Cross-Group Conflict Detection**:
- Parse `cross_group_files[]` from execution-groups.json
- Scan all tasks for files modified by multiple groups
- Flag as critical conflict requiring merge strategy
### Step 3.3: Update execution-groups.json with Conflicts
Append detected cross-group conflicts to execution-groups.json.
**Update Structure**:
```json
{
"groups": [
{
"group_id": "EG-001",
"cross_group_files": [
{
"file": "src/shared/config.ts",
"conflicting_groups": ["EG-002"],
"conflict_type": "both modify shared configuration",
"resolution": "Coordinate changes or use merge strategy"
}
]
}
]
}
```
### Step 3.4: Generate Conflict Artifacts (Extended)
Write conflict results with group context.
**conflicts.json Structure** (extended):
- `detected_at`: Detection timestamp
- `total_conflicts`: Number of conflicts
- `intra_group_conflicts[]`: Conflicts within single group
- `cross_group_conflicts[]`: ⭐ Conflicts across execution groups
- `conflicts[]`: All conflict objects with group IDs
**plan-note.md Update**: Populate "冲突标记" section with:
- Intra-group conflicts (can be resolved during group execution)
- Cross-group conflicts (require coordination or merge strategy)
**Success Criteria**:
- All tasks analyzed for intra-group and cross-group conflicts
- `conflicts.json` written with group-aware detection results
- `execution-groups.json` updated with cross_group_files
- `plan-note.md` updated with conflict markers
- Cross-group conflicts flagged as critical
---
## Phase 4: Execution Strategy Generation
**Objective**: Generate branch strategy and codex execution commands for parallel development.
### Step 4.1: Generate Branch Strategy
Create Git branch strategy for multi-branch parallel development.
**Branch Strategy Decisions**:
1. **Independent Groups** (no cross-group conflicts):
- Each group works on independent branch from main
- Branches can be merged independently
- Parallel development fully supported
2. **Dependent Groups** (cross-group dependencies but no file conflicts):
- Groups with dependencies must coordinate completion order
- Independent branches, but merge order matters
- Group A completes → merge to main → Group B starts/continues
3. **Conflicting Groups** (cross-group file conflicts):
- Strategy 1: Sequential - Complete one group, merge, then start next
- Strategy 2: Feature branch + rebase - Each group rebases on main periodically
- Strategy 3: Shared integration branch - Both groups branch from shared base, coordinate merges
**Default Strategy**: Independent branches with merge order based on dependencies
### Step 4.2: Generate execution-strategy.md
Create execution strategy document with concrete commands.
**execution-strategy.md Structure**:
```markdown
# Execution Strategy: {session_id}
## Overview
- **Total Execution Groups**: {N}
- **Group Strategy**: {automatic|balanced|manual}
- **Branch Strategy**: {independent|dependent|conflicting}
- **Estimated Total Effort**: {sum of all groups}
## Execution Groups
### EG-001: Frontend Development
- **Codex Instance**: codex-1
- **Domains**: frontend, ui-components
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
- **Dependencies**: None (can start immediately)
- **Estimated Effort**: High
### EG-002: Backend Development
- **Codex Instance**: codex-2
- **Domains**: backend-api, database
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
- **Dependencies**: None (can start immediately)
- **Estimated Effort**: Medium
### EG-003: Testing
- **Codex Instance**: codex-3
- **Domains**: testing
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
- **Dependencies**: EG-001, EG-002 (must complete first)
- **Estimated Effort**: Low
## Branch Creation Commands
```bash
# Create branches for all execution groups
git checkout main
git pull
# Group 1: Frontend
git checkout -b feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
git push -u origin feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
# Group 2: Backend
git checkout main
git checkout -b feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
git push -u origin feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
# Group 3: Testing
git checkout main
git checkout -b feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
git push -u origin feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
```
## Parallel Execution Commands
Execute these commands in parallel (separate terminal sessions or background):
```bash
# Terminal 1: Execute Group 1 (Frontend)
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03/plan-note.md" \
GROUP="EG-001" \
/workflow:unified-execute-parallel
# Terminal 2: Execute Group 2 (Backend)
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03/plan-note.md" \
GROUP="EG-002" \
/workflow:unified-execute-parallel
# Terminal 3: Execute Group 3 (Testing) - starts after EG-001 and EG-002 complete
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03/plan-note.md" \
GROUP="EG-003" \
WAIT_FOR="EG-001,EG-002" \
/workflow:unified-execute-parallel
```
## Cross-Group Conflicts
### Critical Conflicts Detected
1. **File: src/shared/config.ts**
- Modified by: EG-001 (frontend), EG-002 (backend)
- Resolution: Coordinate changes or use merge strategy
- Recommendation: EG-001 completes first, EG-002 rebases before continuing
### Resolution Strategy
- **Option 1**: Sequential execution (EG-001 → merge → EG-002 rebases)
- **Option 2**: Manual coordination (both groups align on config changes before execution)
- **Option 3**: Split file (refactor into separate configs if feasible)
## Merge Strategy
### Independent Groups (EG-001, EG-002)
```bash
# After EG-001 completes
git checkout main
git merge feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
git push
# After EG-002 completes
git checkout main
git merge feature/cplan-auth-eg-002-backend
git push
```
### Dependent Group (EG-003)
```bash
# After EG-001 and EG-002 merged to main
git checkout feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
git rebase main # Update with latest changes
# Continue execution...
# After EG-003 completes
git checkout main
git merge feature/cplan-auth-eg-003-testing
git push
```
## Monitoring Progress
Track execution progress:
```bash
# Check execution logs for each group
cat .workflow/.execution/EXEC-eg-001-*/execution-events.md
cat .workflow/.execution/EXEC-eg-002-*/execution-events.md
cat .workflow/.execution/EXEC-eg-003-*/execution-events.md
```
```
### Step 4.3: Generate plan.md Summary (Extended)
Create human-readable summary with execution group information.
**plan.md Structure** (extended):
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| Header | Session ID, task description, creation time |
| 需求 (Requirements) | From plan-note.md "需求理解" |
| 执行组划分 (Execution Groups) | ⭐ Table of groups with domains, branches, codex assignments, dependencies |
| 任务概览 (Task Overview) | All tasks grouped by execution group |
| 冲突报告 (Conflict Report) | Intra-group and cross-group conflicts |
| 执行策略 (Execution Strategy) | Branch strategy, parallel execution commands, merge order |
### Step 4.4: Display Completion Summary
Present session statistics with execution group information.
**Summary Content**:
- Session ID and directory path
- Total execution groups created
- Total domains planned
- Total tasks generated (per group and total)
- Conflict status (intra-group and cross-group)
- Execution strategy summary
- Next step: Use `workflow:unified-execute-parallel` with GROUP parameter
**Success Criteria**:
- `execution-strategy.md` generated with complete branch and execution strategy
- `plan.md` includes execution group information
- All artifacts present in session directory
- User informed of parallel execution approach and commands
- Cross-group conflicts clearly documented with resolution strategies
---
## Configuration
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------------|
| `--max-groups` | 3 | Maximum execution groups to create |
| `--group-strategy` | automatic | Group assignment: automatic / balanced / manual |
| `--focus` | None | Focus specific domain (optional) |
**Group Strategy Details**:
- **automatic**: Group by dependency relationships (dependent domains in same group)
- **balanced**: Distribute evenly by estimated effort
- **manual**: Prompt user to assign domains to groups interactively
---
## Error Handling & Recovery
| Situation | Action | Recovery |
|-----------|--------|----------|
| Too many groups requested | Limit to maxGroups | Merge low-effort domains |
| Circular group dependencies | Stop execution, report error | Reorganize domain assignments |
| All domains in one group | Warning: No parallelization | Continue or prompt user to split |
| Cross-group file conflicts | Flag as critical | Suggest resolution strategies |
| Manual grouping timeout | Fall back to automatic | Continue with automatic strategy |
---
## Best Practices
### Before Starting Planning
1. **Clear Task Description**: Detailed requirements for better grouping
2. **Understand Dependencies**: Know which modules depend on each other
3. **Choose Group Strategy**:
- Use `automatic` for dependency-heavy tasks
- Use `balanced` for independent features
- Use `manual` for complex architectures you understand well
### During Planning
1. **Review Group Assignments**: Check execution-groups.json makes sense
2. **Verify Dependencies**: Cross-group dependencies should be minimal
3. **Check Branch Names**: Ensure branch names follow project conventions
4. **Monitor Conflicts**: Review conflicts.json for cross-group file conflicts
### After Planning
1. **Review Execution Strategy**: Read execution-strategy.md carefully
2. **Resolve Critical Conflicts**: Address cross-group file conflicts before execution
3. **Prepare Environments**: Ensure multiple codex instances can run in parallel
4. **Plan Merge Order**: Understand which groups must merge first
---
## When to Use This Workflow
### Use collaborative-plan-parallel when:
- Complex tasks with multiple independent sub-systems
- Want true parallel development with multiple developers/codex instances
- Need structured multi-branch development strategy
- Tasks have clear domain boundaries with minimal cross-dependencies
- Large projects requiring faster completion through parallelization
### Use collaborative-plan-with-file (original) when:
- Smaller tasks with high inter-domain dependencies
- Single developer/codex instance
- Prefer simpler linear execution
- Cross-domain coordination is critical
### Consider alternatives when:
- Simple single-domain tasks → use `workflow:lite-plan`
- Exploring ideas → use `workflow:brainstorm-with-file`
- Analyzing code → use `workflow:analyze-with-file`
- Ready to execute existing plan → use `workflow:unified-execute-parallel` with GROUP parameter
---
## Migration from Original Workflow
Existing `collaborative-plan-with-file` sessions can be converted to parallel execution:
1. Read existing `plan-note.md` and `requirement-analysis.json`
2. Assign sub-domains to execution groups (run Step 1.2 manually)
3. Generate `execution-groups.json` and `execution-strategy.md`
4. Use `workflow:unified-execute-parallel` for execution
---
**Now execute collaborative-plan-parallel for**: $TASK

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
---
description: Worktree-based parallel execution engine. Execute group tasks in isolated Git worktree. Codex-optimized.
argument-hint: "PLAN=\"<path>\" GROUP=\"<group-id>\" [--auto-commit] [--dry-run]"
---
# Codex Unified-Execute-Parallel Workflow
## Quick Start
Execute tasks for a specific execution group in isolated Git worktree.
**Core workflow**: Load Plan → Select Group → Create Worktree → Execute Tasks → Mark Complete
**Key features**:
- **Worktree isolation**: Each group executes in `.ccw/worktree/{group-id}/`
- **Parallel execution**: Multiple codex instances can run different groups simultaneously
- **Simple focus**: Execute only, merge handled by separate command
## Overview
1. **Plan & Group Selection** - Load plan, select execution group
2. **Worktree Setup** - Create Git worktree for group's branch
3. **Task Execution** - Execute group tasks serially in worktree
4. **Mark Complete** - Record completion status
**Note**: Merging is handled by `/workflow:worktree-merge` command.
## Output Structure
```
.ccw/worktree/
├── {group-id}/ # Git worktree for group
│ ├── (full project checkout)
│ └── .execution/ # Execution artifacts
│ ├── execution.md # Task overview
│ └── execution-events.md # Execution log
.workflow/.execution/
└── worktree-status.json # ⭐ All groups completion status
```
---
## Implementation Details
### Session Variables
- `planPath`: Path to plan file
- `groupId`: Selected execution group ID (required)
- `worktreePath`: `.ccw/worktree/{groupId}`
- `branchName`: From execution-groups.json
- `autoCommit`: Boolean for auto-commit mode
- `dryRun`: Boolean for dry-run mode
---
## Phase 1: Plan & Group Selection
**Objective**: Load plan, extract group metadata, filter tasks.
### Step 1.1: Load Plan File
Read plan file and execution-groups.json from same directory.
**Required Files**:
- `plan-note.md` or `plan.json` - Task definitions
- `execution-groups.json` - Group metadata with branch names
### Step 1.2: Select Group
Validate GROUP parameter.
**Validation**:
- Group exists in execution-groups.json
- Group has assigned tasks
- Branch name is defined
### Step 1.3: Filter Group Tasks
Extract only tasks belonging to selected group.
**Task Filtering**:
- Match by `execution_group` field, OR
- Match by `domain` if domain in group.domains
Build execution order from filtered tasks.
---
## Phase 2: Worktree Setup
**Objective**: Create Git worktree for isolated execution.
### Step 2.1: Create Worktree Directory
Ensure worktree base directory exists.
```bash
mkdir -p .ccw/worktree
```
### Step 2.2: Create Git Worktree
Create worktree with group's branch.
**If worktree doesn't exist**:
```bash
# Create branch and worktree
git worktree add -b {branch-name} .ccw/worktree/{group-id} main
```
**If worktree exists**:
```bash
# Verify worktree is on correct branch
cd .ccw/worktree/{group-id}
git status
```
**Branch Naming**: From execution-groups.json `branch_name` field.
### Step 2.3: Initialize Execution Folder
Create execution tracking folder inside worktree.
```bash
mkdir -p .ccw/worktree/{group-id}/.execution
```
Create initial `execution.md`:
- Group ID and branch name
- Task list for this group
- Start timestamp
**Success Criteria**:
- Worktree created at `.ccw/worktree/{group-id}/`
- Working on correct branch
- Execution folder initialized
---
## Phase 3: Task Execution
**Objective**: Execute group tasks serially in worktree.
### Step 3.1: Change to Worktree Directory
All execution happens inside worktree.
```bash
cd .ccw/worktree/{group-id}
```
### Step 3.2: Execute Tasks Sequentially
For each task in group:
1. Execute via CLI in worktree directory
2. Record result in `.execution/execution-events.md`
3. Auto-commit if enabled
4. Continue to next task
**CLI Execution**:
- `--cd .ccw/worktree/{group-id}` - Execute in worktree
- `--mode write` - Allow file modifications
### Step 3.3: Record Progress
Update `.execution/execution-events.md` after each task:
- Task ID and title
- Timestamp
- Status (completed/failed)
- Files modified
### Step 3.4: Auto-Commit (if enabled)
Commit task changes in worktree.
```bash
cd .ccw/worktree/{group-id}
git add .
git commit -m "feat: {task-title} [TASK-{id}]"
```
---
## Phase 4: Mark Complete
**Objective**: Record group completion status.
### Step 4.1: Update worktree-status.json
Write/update status file in main project.
**worktree-status.json** (in `.workflow/.execution/`):
```json
{
"plan_session": "CPLAN-auth-2025-02-03",
"groups": {
"EG-001": {
"worktree_path": ".ccw/worktree/EG-001",
"branch": "feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend",
"status": "completed",
"tasks_total": 15,
"tasks_completed": 15,
"tasks_failed": 0,
"completed_at": "2025-02-03T14:30:00Z"
},
"EG-002": {
"status": "in_progress",
"tasks_completed": 8,
"tasks_total": 12
}
}
}
```
### Step 4.2: Display Summary
Report group execution results:
- Group ID and worktree path
- Tasks completed/failed
- Next step: Use `/workflow:worktree-merge` to merge
---
## Configuration
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------------|
| `PLAN` | Auto-detect | Path to plan file |
| `GROUP` | Required | Execution group ID (e.g., EG-001) |
| `--auto-commit` | false | Commit after each task |
| `--dry-run` | false | Simulate without changes |
---
## Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| GROUP missing | Error: Require GROUP parameter |
| Group not found | Error: Check execution-groups.json |
| Worktree exists with wrong branch | Warning: Clean or remove existing worktree |
| Task fails | Record failure, continue to next |
---
## Parallel Execution Example
**3 terminals, 3 groups**:
```bash
# Terminal 1
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth/plan-note.md" GROUP="EG-001" --auto-commit
# Terminal 2
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth/plan-note.md" GROUP="EG-002" --auto-commit
# Terminal 3
PLAN=".workflow/.planning/CPLAN-auth/plan-note.md" GROUP="EG-003" --auto-commit
```
Each executes in isolated worktree:
- `.ccw/worktree/EG-001/`
- `.ccw/worktree/EG-002/`
- `.ccw/worktree/EG-003/`
After all complete, use `/workflow:worktree-merge` to merge.
---
**Now execute unified-execute-parallel for**: $PLAN with GROUP=$GROUP

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,556 @@
---
description: Merge completed worktrees back to main branch. Handle cross-group conflicts and dependency order.
argument-hint: "[--plan=<plan-session>] [--group=<group-id>] [--all] [--cleanup]"
---
# Codex Worktree-Merge Workflow
## Quick Start
Merge completed execution group worktrees back to main branch.
**Core workflow**: Load Status → Check Dependencies → Merge Groups → Cleanup Worktrees
**Key features**:
- **Dependency-aware merge**: Merge groups in correct order
- **Conflict detection**: Check for cross-group file conflicts
- **Selective or bulk merge**: Merge single group or all completed groups
- **Cleanup option**: Remove worktrees after successful merge
## Overview
1. **Load Status** - Read worktree-status.json and execution-groups.json
2. **Validate Dependencies** - Check group dependencies are merged first
3. **Merge Worktree** - Merge group's branch to main
4. **Update Status** - Mark group as merged
5. **Cleanup** (optional) - Remove worktree after merge
**Note**: This command only merges, execution is handled by `/workflow:unified-execute-parallel`.
## Input Files
```
.workflow/.execution/
└── worktree-status.json # Group completion status
.workflow/.planning/{session}/
├── execution-groups.json # Group metadata and dependencies
└── conflicts.json # Cross-group conflicts (if any)
.ccw/worktree/
├── {group-id}/ # Worktree to merge
│ ├── .execution/ # Execution logs
│ └── (modified files)
```
## Output
```
.workflow/.execution/
├── worktree-status.json # Updated with merge status
└── merge-log.md # Merge history and details
```
---
## Implementation Details
### Command Parameters
- `--plan=<session>`: Plan session ID (auto-detect if not provided)
- `--group=<id>`: Merge specific group (e.g., EG-001)
- `--all`: Merge all completed groups in dependency order
- `--cleanup`: Remove worktree after successful merge
**Examples**:
```bash
# Merge single group
--group=EG-001
# Merge all completed groups
--all
# Merge and cleanup
--group=EG-001 --cleanup
```
---
## Phase 1: Load Status
**Objective**: Read completion status and group metadata.
### Step 1.1: Load worktree-status.json
Read group completion status.
**Status File Location**: `.workflow/.execution/worktree-status.json`
**Required Fields**:
- `plan_session`: Planning session ID
- `groups[]`: Array of group status objects
- `status`: "completed" / "in_progress" / "failed"
- `worktree_path`: Path to worktree
- `branch`: Branch name
- `merge_status`: "not_merged" / "merged"
### Step 1.2: Load execution-groups.json
Read group dependencies.
**Metadata File**: `.workflow/.planning/{session}/execution-groups.json`
**Required Fields**:
- `groups[]`: Group metadata with dependencies
- `group_id`: Group identifier
- `dependencies_on_groups[]`: Groups that must merge first
- `cross_group_files[]`: Files modified by multiple groups
### Step 1.3: Determine Merge Targets
Select groups to merge based on parameters.
**Selection Logic**:
| Parameter | Behavior |
|-----------|----------|
| `--group=EG-001` | Merge only specified group |
| `--all` | Merge all groups with status="completed" |
| Neither | Prompt user to select from completed groups |
**Validation**:
- Group must have status="completed"
- Group's worktree must exist
- Group must not already be merged
---
## Phase 2: Validate Dependencies
**Objective**: Ensure dependencies are merged before target group.
### Step 2.1: Build Dependency Graph
Create merge order based on inter-group dependencies.
**Dependency Analysis**:
1. For target group, check `dependencies_on_groups[]`
2. For each dependency, verify merge status
3. Build topological order for merge sequence
**Example**:
```json
EG-003 depends on [EG-001, EG-002]
Merge order: EG-001, EG-002, then EG-003
```
### Step 2.2: Check Dependency Status
Validate all dependencies are merged.
**Check Logic**:
```
For each dependency in target.dependencies_on_groups:
├─ Check dependency.merge_status == "merged"
├─ If not merged: Error or prompt to merge dependency first
└─ If merged: Continue
```
**Options on Dependency Not Met**:
1. **Error**: Refuse to merge until dependencies merged
2. **Cascade**: Automatically merge dependencies first (if --all)
3. **Force**: Allow merge anyway (dangerous, use --force)
---
## Phase 3: Conflict Detection
**Objective**: Check for cross-group file conflicts before merge.
### Step 3.1: Load Cross-Group Files
Read files modified by multiple groups.
**Source**: `execution-groups.json``groups[].cross_group_files[]`
**Example**:
```json
{
"group_id": "EG-001",
"cross_group_files": [
{
"file": "src/shared/config.ts",
"conflicting_groups": ["EG-002"]
}
]
}
```
### Step 3.2: Check File Modifications
Compare file state across groups and main.
**Conflict Check**:
1. For each cross-group file:
- Get version on main branch
- Get version in target worktree
- Get version in conflicting group worktrees
2. If all different → conflict likely
3. If same → safe to merge
### Step 3.3: Report Conflicts
Display potential conflicts to user.
**Conflict Report**:
```markdown
## Potential Merge Conflicts
### File: src/shared/config.ts
- Modified by: EG-001 (target), EG-002
- Status: EG-002 already merged to main
- Action: Manual review recommended
### File: package.json
- Modified by: EG-001 (target), EG-003
- Status: EG-003 not yet merged
- Action: Safe to merge (EG-003 will handle conflict)
```
**User Decision**:
- Proceed with merge (handle conflicts manually if occur)
- Abort and review files first
- Coordinate with other group maintainers
---
## Phase 4: Merge Worktree
**Objective**: Merge group's branch from worktree to main.
### Step 4.1: Prepare Main Branch
Ensure main branch is up to date.
```bash
git checkout main
git pull origin main
```
### Step 4.2: Merge Group Branch
Merge from worktree's branch.
**Merge Command**:
```bash
# Strategy 1: Regular merge (creates merge commit)
git merge --no-ff {branch-name} -m "Merge {group-id}: {description}"
# Strategy 2: Squash merge (single commit)
git merge --squash {branch-name}
git commit -m "feat: {group-id} - {description}"
```
**Default**: Use regular merge to preserve history.
### Step 4.3: Handle Merge Conflicts
If conflicts occur, provide resolution guidance.
**Conflict Resolution**:
```bash
# List conflicting files
git status
# For each conflict:
# 1. Open file and resolve markers
# 2. Stage resolved file
git add {file}
# Complete merge
git commit
```
**Conflict Types**:
- **Cross-group file**: Expected, requires manual merge
- **Unexpected conflict**: Investigate cause
### Step 4.4: Push to Remote
Push merged changes.
```bash
git push origin main
```
**Validation**:
- Check CI/tests pass after merge
- Verify no regressions
---
## Phase 5: Update Status & Cleanup
**Objective**: Mark group as merged, optionally remove worktree.
### Step 5.1: Update worktree-status.json
Mark group as merged.
**Status Update**:
```json
{
"groups": {
"EG-001": {
"merge_status": "merged",
"merged_at": "2025-02-03T15:00:00Z",
"merged_to": "main",
"merge_commit": "abc123def456"
}
}
}
```
### Step 5.2: Append to merge-log.md
Record merge details.
**Merge Log Entry**:
```markdown
## EG-001: Frontend Development
- **Merged At**: 2025-02-03 15:00:00
- **Branch**: feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
- **Commit**: abc123def456
- **Tasks Completed**: 15/15
- **Conflicts**: 1 file (src/shared/config.ts) - resolved
- **Status**: Successfully merged to main
```
### Step 5.3: Cleanup Worktree (optional)
Remove worktree if --cleanup flag provided.
**Cleanup Commands**:
```bash
# Remove worktree
git worktree remove .ccw/worktree/{group-id}
# Delete branch (optional)
git branch -d {branch-name}
git push origin --delete {branch-name}
```
**When to Cleanup**:
- Group successfully merged
- No need to revisit worktree
- Disk space needed
**When to Keep**:
- May need to reference execution logs
- Other groups may need to coordinate
- Debugging merge issues
### Step 5.4: Display Summary
Report merge results.
**Summary Output**:
```
✓ Merged EG-001 to main
- Branch: feature/cplan-auth-eg-001-frontend
- Commit: abc123def456
- Tasks: 15/15 completed
- Conflicts: 1 resolved
- Worktree: Cleaned up
Remaining groups:
- EG-002: completed, ready to merge
- EG-003: in progress, waiting for dependencies
```
---
## Configuration
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------------|
| `--plan` | Auto-detect | Plan session ID |
| `--group` | Interactive | Group to merge |
| `--all` | false | Merge all completed groups |
| `--cleanup` | false | Remove worktree after merge |
| `--force` | false | Ignore dependency checks |
| `--squash` | false | Use squash merge instead of regular |
---
## Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Group not completed | Error: Complete execution first |
| Group already merged | Skip with warning |
| Dependencies not merged | Error or cascade merge (--all) |
| Merge conflict | Pause for manual resolution |
| Worktree not found | Error: Check worktree path |
| Push fails | Rollback merge, report error |
---
## Merge Strategies
### Strategy 1: Sequential Merge
Merge groups one by one in dependency order.
```bash
# Merge EG-001
--group=EG-001 --cleanup
# Merge EG-002
--group=EG-002 --cleanup
# Merge EG-003 (depends on EG-001, EG-002)
--group=EG-003 --cleanup
```
**Use When**:
- Want to review each merge carefully
- High risk of conflicts
- Testing between merges
### Strategy 2: Bulk Merge
Merge all completed groups at once.
```bash
--all --cleanup
```
**Use When**:
- Groups are independent
- Low conflict risk
- Want fast integration
### Strategy 3: Dependency-First
Merge dependencies before dependent groups.
```bash
# Automatically merges EG-001, EG-002 before EG-003
--group=EG-003 --cascade
```
**Use When**:
- Complex dependency graph
- Want automatic ordering
---
## Best Practices
### Before Merge
1. **Verify Completion**: Check all tasks in group completed
2. **Review Conflicts**: Read conflicts.json for cross-group files
3. **Test Worktree**: Run tests in worktree before merge
4. **Update Main**: Ensure main branch is current
### During Merge
1. **Follow Order**: Respect dependency order
2. **Review Conflicts**: Carefully resolve cross-group conflicts
3. **Test After Merge**: Run CI/tests after each merge
4. **Commit Often**: Keep merge history clean
### After Merge
1. **Update Status**: Ensure worktree-status.json reflects merge
2. **Keep Logs**: Archive merge-log.md for reference
3. **Cleanup Gradually**: Don't rush to delete worktrees
4. **Notify Team**: Inform others of merged groups
---
## Rollback Strategy
If merge causes issues:
```bash
# Find merge commit
git log --oneline
# Revert merge
git revert -m 1 {merge-commit}
git push origin main
# Or reset (dangerous, loses history)
git reset --hard HEAD~1
git push origin main --force
# Update status
# Mark group as not_merged in worktree-status.json
```
---
## Example Workflow
### Scenario: 3 Groups Complete
**Status**:
- EG-001: Completed (no dependencies)
- EG-002: Completed (no dependencies)
- EG-003: Completed (depends on EG-001, EG-002)
### Step 1: Merge Independent Groups
```bash
# Merge EG-001
--group=EG-001
# Test after merge
npm test
# Merge EG-002
--group=EG-002
# Test after merge
npm test
```
### Step 2: Merge Dependent Group
```bash
# EG-003 depends on EG-001, EG-002 (already merged)
--group=EG-003
# Final test
npm test
```
### Step 3: Cleanup All Worktrees
```bash
# Remove all merged worktrees
--cleanup-all
```
---
## When to Use This Workflow
### Use worktree-merge when:
- Execution groups completed via unified-execute-parallel
- Ready to integrate changes to main branch
- Need dependency-aware merge order
- Want to handle cross-group conflicts systematically
### Manual merge when:
- Single group with no dependencies
- Comfortable with Git merge commands
- No cross-group conflicts to handle
---
**Now execute worktree-merge for completed execution groups**