mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-10 02:24:35 +08:00
Compare commits
1 Commits
main
...
claude/che
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ab7bf32263 |
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# 中文回复准则
|
||||
|
||||
## 核心原则
|
||||
|
||||
- 所有回复使用简体中文
|
||||
- 技术术语保留英文，首次出现可添加中文解释
|
||||
- 代码变量名保持英文，注释使用中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 格式规范
|
||||
|
||||
- 中英文/数字间加空格：`使用 TypeScript 开发`、`共 3 个文件`
|
||||
- 使用中文标点：，。！？：；
|
||||
- 代码/命令用反引号：`npm install`
|
||||
|
||||
## Git Commit
|
||||
|
||||
- 使用中文提交信息
|
||||
- 格式：`类型: 简短描述`
|
||||
- 类型：feat/fix/refactor/docs/test/chore
|
||||
|
||||
## 保持英文
|
||||
|
||||
- 代码文件内容
|
||||
- 错误信息和日志
|
||||
- 文件路径和命令
|
||||
@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"_template_description": "Template for fix planning output. Planning agent reads this template and generates actual fix-plan.json",
|
||||
"_usage": "Planning agent should follow this structure when analyzing findings and creating fix plan",
|
||||
|
||||
"plan_id": "<string: plan-{timestamp}>",
|
||||
"created_at": "<string: ISO8601 timestamp>",
|
||||
"total_findings": "<number: total findings to fix>",
|
||||
|
||||
"execution_strategy": {
|
||||
"approach": "<string: hybrid|parallel|serial>",
|
||||
"parallel_limit": "<number: max concurrent agents, default 3>",
|
||||
"total_stages": "<number: how many stages in timeline>",
|
||||
"rationale": "<string: explain why this strategy was chosen>"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"groups": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"group_id": "<string: unique group identifier like G1, G2, ...>",
|
||||
"group_name": "<string: descriptive name for this group>",
|
||||
"findings": ["<array of finding IDs>"],
|
||||
|
||||
"fix_strategy": {
|
||||
"approach": "<string: high-level fix approach>",
|
||||
"rationale": "<string: why these findings were grouped together>",
|
||||
"complexity": "<string: low|medium|high>",
|
||||
"estimated_duration_minutes": "<number: estimated time>",
|
||||
"test_pattern": "<string: test file glob pattern like tests/auth/**/*.test.*>",
|
||||
"rollback_plan": "<string: what to do if fix fails>"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"risk_assessment": {
|
||||
"level": "<string: low|medium|high|critical>",
|
||||
"concerns": ["<array of strings: potential risks>"],
|
||||
"mitigation": "<string: how to mitigate risks>"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"timeline": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"stage": "<number: stage number 1-indexed>",
|
||||
"groups": ["<array of group IDs to execute in this stage>"],
|
||||
"execution_mode": "<string: parallel|serial>",
|
||||
"depends_on": ["<optional: array of group IDs this stage depends on>"],
|
||||
"rationale": "<string: why these groups are in this stage with this mode>"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"_instructions": {
|
||||
"grouping_principles": [
|
||||
"Group findings in the same file with same dimension",
|
||||
"Group findings with similar root causes (high semantic similarity)",
|
||||
"Consider file dependencies and execution order",
|
||||
"Balance group sizes for efficient parallel execution"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"execution_strategy_guidelines": [
|
||||
"Use parallel for independent groups in different files",
|
||||
"Use serial for dependent changes (e.g., shared utilities)",
|
||||
"Limit parallelism to 3 concurrent agents to avoid resource contention",
|
||||
"High-risk groups should be isolated for careful monitoring"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"test_strategy_guidelines": [
|
||||
"Identify test files related to changed code",
|
||||
"Use specific patterns for faster test execution",
|
||||
"Ensure test coverage captures all fix impacts",
|
||||
"Define clear pass criteria (usually 100% pass rate)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"risk_assessment_guidelines": [
|
||||
"Low: Simple fixes with comprehensive test coverage",
|
||||
"Medium: Moderate changes affecting multiple components",
|
||||
"High: Core logic changes or security-critical fixes",
|
||||
"Critical: Database schema changes or breaking API changes"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "fix-progress-template.json",
|
||||
"$comment": "Template for fix-progress-{N}.json - one per group, initialized by planning agent, updated by execution agent",
|
||||
|
||||
"progress_id": "fix-progress-N",
|
||||
"group_id": "GN",
|
||||
"group_name": "Group name from fix plan",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"phase": "waiting",
|
||||
|
||||
"assigned_agent": null,
|
||||
"started_at": null,
|
||||
"last_update": "ISO 8601 timestamp",
|
||||
|
||||
"findings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"finding_id": "finding-uuid",
|
||||
"finding_title": "Finding title from review",
|
||||
"file": "path/to/file.ts",
|
||||
"line": 0,
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"result": null,
|
||||
"attempts": 0,
|
||||
"started_at": null,
|
||||
"completed_at": null,
|
||||
"commit_hash": null,
|
||||
"test_passed": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"total_findings": 0,
|
||||
"pending": 0,
|
||||
"in_progress": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 0,
|
||||
"failed": 0,
|
||||
"percent_complete": 0.0
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"current_finding": null,
|
||||
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [],
|
||||
"current_step": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"errors": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,266 +0,0 @@
|
||||
生成符合 RESTful 规范的完整 Swagger/OpenAPI API 文档。
|
||||
|
||||
## 核心检查清单 ⚡
|
||||
□ 严格遵循 RESTful API 设计规范
|
||||
□ 每个接口必须包含：功能描述、请求方法、URL路径、参数说明
|
||||
□ 必须包含全局 Security 配置（Authorization Bearer Token）
|
||||
□ 使用中文命名目录，保持层级清晰
|
||||
□ 每个字段需注明：类型、是否必填、示例值、说明
|
||||
□ 包含成功和失败的响应示例
|
||||
□ 标注接口版本和最后更新时间
|
||||
|
||||
## OpenAPI 规范结构
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. 文档信息 (info)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
openapi: 3.0.3
|
||||
info:
|
||||
title: {项目名称} API
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
{项目描述}
|
||||
|
||||
## 认证方式
|
||||
所有需要认证的接口必须在请求头中携带 Bearer Token：
|
||||
```
|
||||
Authorization: Bearer <your-token>
|
||||
```
|
||||
version: "1.0.0"
|
||||
contact:
|
||||
name: API 支持
|
||||
email: api-support@example.com
|
||||
license:
|
||||
name: MIT
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. 服务器配置 (servers)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url: https://api.example.com/v1
|
||||
description: 生产环境
|
||||
- url: https://staging-api.example.com/v1
|
||||
description: 测试环境
|
||||
- url: http://localhost:3000/v1
|
||||
description: 开发环境
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. 全局安全配置 (security)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
components:
|
||||
securitySchemes:
|
||||
bearerAuth:
|
||||
type: http
|
||||
scheme: bearer
|
||||
bearerFormat: JWT
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
JWT Token 认证
|
||||
|
||||
获取方式：调用 POST /auth/login 接口
|
||||
有效期：24小时
|
||||
刷新：调用 POST /auth/refresh 接口
|
||||
|
||||
security:
|
||||
- bearerAuth: []
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. 接口路径规范 (paths)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
/users:
|
||||
get:
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- 用户管理
|
||||
summary: 获取用户列表
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
分页获取系统用户列表，支持按状态、角色筛选。
|
||||
|
||||
**适用环境**: 开发、测试、生产
|
||||
**前置条件**: 需要管理员权限
|
||||
operationId: listUsers
|
||||
security:
|
||||
- bearerAuth: []
|
||||
parameters:
|
||||
- name: page
|
||||
in: query
|
||||
required: false
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
type: integer
|
||||
default: 1
|
||||
minimum: 1
|
||||
description: 页码（从1开始）
|
||||
example: 1
|
||||
- name: limit
|
||||
in: query
|
||||
required: false
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
type: integer
|
||||
default: 20
|
||||
minimum: 1
|
||||
maximum: 100
|
||||
description: 每页数量
|
||||
example: 20
|
||||
responses:
|
||||
'200':
|
||||
description: 成功获取用户列表
|
||||
content:
|
||||
application/json:
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/UserListResponse'
|
||||
example:
|
||||
code: 0
|
||||
message: success
|
||||
data:
|
||||
items:
|
||||
- id: "usr_123"
|
||||
email: "user@example.com"
|
||||
name: "张三"
|
||||
total: 100
|
||||
page: 1
|
||||
limit: 20
|
||||
'401':
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/responses/UnauthorizedError'
|
||||
'403':
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/responses/ForbiddenError'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. 数据模型规范 (schemas)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
components:
|
||||
schemas:
|
||||
# 基础响应结构
|
||||
BaseResponse:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
required:
|
||||
- code
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- timestamp
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
code:
|
||||
type: integer
|
||||
description: 业务状态码，0表示成功
|
||||
example: 0
|
||||
message:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
description: 响应消息
|
||||
example: success
|
||||
timestamp:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
format: date-time
|
||||
description: 响应时间戳
|
||||
example: "2025-01-01T12:00:00Z"
|
||||
|
||||
# 错误响应
|
||||
ErrorResponse:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
required:
|
||||
- code
|
||||
- message
|
||||
properties:
|
||||
code:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
description: 错误码
|
||||
example: "AUTH_001"
|
||||
message:
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
description: 错误信息
|
||||
example: "Token 无效或已过期"
|
||||
details:
|
||||
type: object
|
||||
description: 错误详情
|
||||
additionalProperties: true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. 统一响应定义 (responses)
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
components:
|
||||
responses:
|
||||
UnauthorizedError:
|
||||
description: 认证失败
|
||||
content:
|
||||
application/json:
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'
|
||||
example:
|
||||
code: "AUTH_001"
|
||||
message: "Token 无效或已过期"
|
||||
ForbiddenError:
|
||||
description: 权限不足
|
||||
content:
|
||||
application/json:
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'
|
||||
example:
|
||||
code: "AUTH_003"
|
||||
message: "权限不足，需要管理员角色"
|
||||
NotFoundError:
|
||||
description: 资源不存在
|
||||
content:
|
||||
application/json:
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'
|
||||
example:
|
||||
code: "BIZ_002"
|
||||
message: "资源不存在"
|
||||
ValidationError:
|
||||
description: 参数验证失败
|
||||
content:
|
||||
application/json:
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'
|
||||
example:
|
||||
code: "PARAM_001"
|
||||
message: "参数格式错误"
|
||||
details:
|
||||
field: "email"
|
||||
reason: "邮箱格式不正确"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 接口文档必填项
|
||||
|
||||
每个接口必须包含：
|
||||
|
||||
1. **基本信息**
|
||||
- tags: 所属模块（中文）
|
||||
- summary: 一句话描述
|
||||
- description: 详细说明（含适用环境、前置条件）
|
||||
- operationId: 唯一操作标识
|
||||
|
||||
2. **安全配置**
|
||||
- security: 认证要求
|
||||
|
||||
3. **参数定义**
|
||||
- name: 参数名
|
||||
- in: 位置 (path/query/header/cookie)
|
||||
- required: 是否必填
|
||||
- schema: 类型定义（含 default, minimum, maximum）
|
||||
- description: 参数说明
|
||||
- example: 示例值
|
||||
|
||||
4. **响应定义**
|
||||
- 200: 成功响应（含完整示例）
|
||||
- 400: 参数错误
|
||||
- 401: 认证失败
|
||||
- 403: 权限不足
|
||||
- 404: 资源不存在（如适用）
|
||||
- 500: 服务器错误
|
||||
|
||||
5. **版本信息**
|
||||
- x-version: 接口版本
|
||||
- x-updated: 最后更新时间
|
||||
|
||||
## 错误码规范
|
||||
|
||||
| 前缀 | 类别 | HTTP状态码 | 说明 |
|
||||
|------|------|------------|------|
|
||||
| AUTH_ | 认证错误 | 401/403 | 身份验证相关 |
|
||||
| PARAM_ | 参数错误 | 400 | 请求参数验证 |
|
||||
| BIZ_ | 业务错误 | 409/422 | 业务逻辑相关 |
|
||||
| SYS_ | 系统错误 | 500/503 | 服务器异常 |
|
||||
|
||||
## RESTful 设计规范
|
||||
|
||||
1. **URL 命名**: 使用复数名词，小写，连字符分隔
|
||||
2. **HTTP 方法**: GET(查询)、POST(创建)、PUT(更新)、DELETE(删除)、PATCH(部分更新)
|
||||
3. **状态码**: 正确使用 2xx/3xx/4xx/5xx
|
||||
4. **分页**: 使用 page/limit 或 offset/limit
|
||||
5. **筛选**: 使用查询参数
|
||||
6. **版本**: URL 路径 (/v1/) 或 请求头
|
||||
@@ -1,122 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Rule Template: API Rules (Backend/Fullstack Only)
|
||||
|
||||
## Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Tech stack display name
|
||||
- {FILE_EXT}: File extension pattern
|
||||
- {API_FRAMEWORK}: API framework (Express, FastAPI, etc)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
- "**/api/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/routes/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/endpoints/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/controllers/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/handlers/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {TECH_STACK_NAME} API Rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Endpoint Design
|
||||
|
||||
[REST/GraphQL conventions from Exa research]
|
||||
|
||||
### URL Structure
|
||||
- Resource naming (plural nouns)
|
||||
- Nesting depth limits
|
||||
- Query parameter conventions
|
||||
- Version prefixing
|
||||
|
||||
### HTTP Methods
|
||||
- GET: Read operations
|
||||
- POST: Create operations
|
||||
- PUT/PATCH: Update operations
|
||||
- DELETE: Remove operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Status Codes
|
||||
- 2xx: Success responses
|
||||
- 4xx: Client errors
|
||||
- 5xx: Server errors
|
||||
|
||||
## Request Validation
|
||||
|
||||
[Input validation patterns]
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Validation
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
// Example validation schema
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Fields
|
||||
- Validation approach
|
||||
- Error messages format
|
||||
- Sanitization rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Response Format
|
||||
|
||||
[Standard response structures]
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Response
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"data": {},
|
||||
"meta": {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Pagination
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"data": [],
|
||||
"pagination": {
|
||||
"page": 1,
|
||||
"limit": 20,
|
||||
"total": 100
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Responses
|
||||
|
||||
[Error handling for APIs]
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Format
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"error": {
|
||||
"code": "ERROR_CODE",
|
||||
"message": "Human readable message",
|
||||
"details": {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Common Error Codes
|
||||
- VALIDATION_ERROR
|
||||
- NOT_FOUND
|
||||
- UNAUTHORIZED
|
||||
- FORBIDDEN
|
||||
|
||||
## Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
[Auth patterns]
|
||||
- Token handling
|
||||
- Permission checks
|
||||
- Rate limiting
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[API documentation standards]
|
||||
- OpenAPI/Swagger
|
||||
- Inline documentation
|
||||
- Example requests/responses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on API-specific patterns
|
||||
- Include request/response examples
|
||||
- Cover security considerations
|
||||
- Reference framework conventions
|
||||
@@ -1,122 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Rule Template: Component Rules (Frontend/Fullstack Only)
|
||||
|
||||
## Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Tech stack display name
|
||||
- {FILE_EXT}: File extension pattern
|
||||
- {UI_FRAMEWORK}: UI framework (React, Vue, etc)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
- "**/components/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/ui/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/views/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/pages/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {TECH_STACK_NAME} Component Rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[Organization patterns from Exa research]
|
||||
|
||||
### File Organization
|
||||
```
|
||||
components/
|
||||
├── common/ # Shared components
|
||||
├── features/ # Feature-specific
|
||||
├── layout/ # Layout components
|
||||
└── ui/ # Base UI elements
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Template
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
// Standard component structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions
|
||||
- PascalCase for components
|
||||
- Descriptive names
|
||||
- Prefix conventions (if any)
|
||||
|
||||
## Props & State
|
||||
|
||||
[State management guidelines]
|
||||
|
||||
### Props Definition
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
// Props type/interface example
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Props Best Practices
|
||||
- Required vs optional
|
||||
- Default values
|
||||
- Prop validation
|
||||
- Prop naming
|
||||
|
||||
### Local State
|
||||
- When to use local state
|
||||
- State initialization
|
||||
- State updates
|
||||
|
||||
### Shared State
|
||||
- State management approach
|
||||
- Context usage
|
||||
- Store patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Styling
|
||||
|
||||
[CSS/styling conventions]
|
||||
|
||||
### Approach
|
||||
- [CSS Modules/Styled Components/Tailwind/etc]
|
||||
|
||||
### Style Organization
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
// Style example
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Naming Conventions
|
||||
- Class naming (BEM, etc)
|
||||
- CSS variable usage
|
||||
- Theme integration
|
||||
|
||||
## Accessibility
|
||||
|
||||
[A11y requirements]
|
||||
|
||||
### Essential Requirements
|
||||
- Semantic HTML
|
||||
- ARIA labels
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation
|
||||
- Focus management
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing A11y
|
||||
- Automated checks
|
||||
- Manual testing
|
||||
- Screen reader testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance
|
||||
|
||||
[Performance guidelines]
|
||||
|
||||
### Optimization Patterns
|
||||
- Memoization
|
||||
- Lazy loading
|
||||
- Code splitting
|
||||
- Virtual lists
|
||||
|
||||
### Avoiding Re-renders
|
||||
- When to memoize
|
||||
- Callback optimization
|
||||
- State structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on component-specific patterns
|
||||
- Include framework-specific examples
|
||||
- Cover accessibility requirements
|
||||
- Address performance considerations
|
||||
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Rule Template: Configuration Rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Tech stack display name
|
||||
- {CONFIG_FILES}: List of config file patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
- "*.config.*"
|
||||
- ".*rc"
|
||||
- ".*rc.{js,json,yaml,yml}"
|
||||
- "package.json"
|
||||
- "tsconfig*.json"
|
||||
- "pyproject.toml"
|
||||
- "Cargo.toml"
|
||||
- "go.mod"
|
||||
- ".env*"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {TECH_STACK_NAME} Configuration Rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Setup
|
||||
|
||||
[Configuration guidelines from Exa research]
|
||||
|
||||
### Essential Config Files
|
||||
- [List primary config files]
|
||||
- [Purpose of each]
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
project/
|
||||
├── [config files]
|
||||
├── src/
|
||||
└── tests/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Tooling
|
||||
|
||||
[Linters, formatters, bundlers]
|
||||
|
||||
### Linting
|
||||
- Tool: [ESLint/Pylint/etc]
|
||||
- Config file: [.eslintrc/pyproject.toml/etc]
|
||||
- Key rules to enable
|
||||
|
||||
### Formatting
|
||||
- Tool: [Prettier/Black/etc]
|
||||
- Integration with editor
|
||||
- Pre-commit hooks
|
||||
|
||||
### Build Tools
|
||||
- Bundler: [Webpack/Vite/etc]
|
||||
- Build configuration
|
||||
- Optimization settings
|
||||
|
||||
## Environment
|
||||
|
||||
[Environment management]
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Variables
|
||||
- Naming conventions
|
||||
- Required vs optional
|
||||
- Secret handling
|
||||
- .env file structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Development vs Production
|
||||
- Environment-specific configs
|
||||
- Feature flags
|
||||
- Debug settings
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
[Dependency management]
|
||||
- Lock file usage
|
||||
- Version pinning strategy
|
||||
- Security updates
|
||||
- Peer dependencies
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on config file best practices
|
||||
- Include security considerations
|
||||
- Cover development workflow setup
|
||||
- Mention CI/CD integration where relevant
|
||||
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Rule Template: Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
## Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Tech stack display name
|
||||
- {FILE_EXT}: File extension pattern
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths: **/*.{FILE_EXT}
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {TECH_STACK_NAME} Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
## Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
[Synthesize core philosophy from Exa research]
|
||||
- Key paradigms and mental models
|
||||
- Design philosophy
|
||||
- Community conventions
|
||||
|
||||
## Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
[Language-specific naming rules]
|
||||
- Variables and functions
|
||||
- Classes and types
|
||||
- Files and directories
|
||||
- Constants and enums
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Organization
|
||||
|
||||
[Structure and module guidelines]
|
||||
- File structure patterns
|
||||
- Module boundaries
|
||||
- Import organization
|
||||
- Dependency management
|
||||
|
||||
## Type Safety
|
||||
|
||||
[Type system best practices - if applicable]
|
||||
- Type annotation guidelines
|
||||
- Generic usage patterns
|
||||
- Type inference vs explicit types
|
||||
- Null/undefined handling
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Documentation standards]
|
||||
- Comment style
|
||||
- JSDoc/docstring format
|
||||
- README conventions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on universal principles that apply to ALL files
|
||||
- Keep rules actionable and specific
|
||||
- Include rationale for each rule
|
||||
- Reference official style guides where applicable
|
||||
@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Rule Template: Implementation Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Tech stack display name
|
||||
- {FILE_EXT}: File extension pattern
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths: src/**/*.{FILE_EXT}
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {TECH_STACK_NAME} Implementation Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[With code examples from Exa research]
|
||||
|
||||
### Pattern 1: [Name]
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
// Example code
|
||||
```
|
||||
**When to use**: [Context]
|
||||
**Benefits**: [Why this pattern]
|
||||
|
||||
### Pattern 2: [Name]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
||||
|
||||
[Common mistakes with examples]
|
||||
|
||||
### Anti-Pattern 1: [Name]
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
// Bad example
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Problem**: [Why it's bad]
|
||||
**Solution**: [Better approach]
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
[Error handling conventions]
|
||||
- Error types and hierarchy
|
||||
- Try-catch patterns
|
||||
- Error propagation
|
||||
- Logging practices
|
||||
|
||||
## Async Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Asynchronous code conventions - if applicable]
|
||||
- Promise handling
|
||||
- Async/await usage
|
||||
- Concurrency patterns
|
||||
- Error handling in async code
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
[State handling patterns]
|
||||
- Local state patterns
|
||||
- Shared state approaches
|
||||
- Immutability practices
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- Focus on source code implementation
|
||||
- Provide concrete code examples
|
||||
- Show both good and bad patterns
|
||||
- Include context for when to apply each pattern
|
||||
@@ -1,81 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Rule Template: Testing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Tech stack display name
|
||||
- {FILE_EXT}: File extension pattern
|
||||
- {TEST_FRAMEWORK}: Primary testing framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
- "**/*.{test,spec}.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "tests/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "__tests__/**/*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/test_*.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
- "**/*_test.{FILE_EXT}"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# {TECH_STACK_NAME} Testing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Framework
|
||||
|
||||
[Recommended frameworks from Exa research]
|
||||
- Primary: {TEST_FRAMEWORK}
|
||||
- Assertion library
|
||||
- Mocking library
|
||||
- Coverage tool
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Structure
|
||||
|
||||
[Organization patterns]
|
||||
|
||||
### File Naming
|
||||
- Unit tests: `*.test.{ext}` or `*.spec.{ext}`
|
||||
- Integration tests: `*.integration.test.{ext}`
|
||||
- E2E tests: `*.e2e.test.{ext}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Organization
|
||||
```{lang}
|
||||
describe('[Component/Module]', () => {
|
||||
describe('[method/feature]', () => {
|
||||
it('should [expected behavior]', () => {
|
||||
// Arrange
|
||||
// Act
|
||||
// Assert
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Mocking & Fixtures
|
||||
|
||||
[Best practices]
|
||||
- Mock creation patterns
|
||||
- Fixture organization
|
||||
- Test data factories
|
||||
- Cleanup strategies
|
||||
|
||||
## Assertions
|
||||
|
||||
[Assertion patterns]
|
||||
- Common assertions
|
||||
- Custom matchers
|
||||
- Async assertions
|
||||
- Error assertions
|
||||
|
||||
## Coverage Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[Coverage guidelines]
|
||||
- Minimum coverage thresholds
|
||||
- What to cover vs skip
|
||||
- Coverage report interpretation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- Include framework-specific patterns
|
||||
- Show test structure examples
|
||||
- Cover both unit and integration testing
|
||||
- Include async testing patterns
|
||||
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Tech Stack Rules Generation Agent Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
## Context Variables
|
||||
- {TECH_STACK_NAME}: Normalized tech stack name (e.g., "typescript-react")
|
||||
- {PRIMARY_LANG}: Primary language (e.g., "typescript")
|
||||
- {FILE_EXT}: File extension pattern (e.g., "{ts,tsx}")
|
||||
- {FRAMEWORK_TYPE}: frontend | backend | fullstack | library
|
||||
- {COMPONENTS}: Array of tech components
|
||||
- {OUTPUT_DIR}: .claude/rules/tech/{TECH_STACK_NAME}/
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
Generate path-conditional rules for Claude Code automatic loading.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Execute Exa Research
|
||||
|
||||
Run 4-6 parallel queries based on tech stack:
|
||||
|
||||
**Base Queries** (always execute):
|
||||
```
|
||||
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: "{PRIMARY_LANG} best practices principles 2025", tokensNum: 8000)
|
||||
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: "{PRIMARY_LANG} implementation patterns examples", tokensNum: 7000)
|
||||
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: "{PRIMARY_LANG} testing strategies conventions", tokensNum: 5000)
|
||||
mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query: "{PRIMARY_LANG} configuration setup 2025", numResults: 5)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Component Queries** (for each framework in COMPONENTS):
|
||||
```
|
||||
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: "{PRIMARY_LANG} {component} integration patterns", tokensNum: 5000)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Read Rule Templates
|
||||
|
||||
Read each template file before generating content:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Read(~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/rule-core.txt)
|
||||
Read(~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/rule-patterns.txt)
|
||||
Read(~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/rule-testing.txt)
|
||||
Read(~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/rule-config.txt)
|
||||
Read(~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/rule-api.txt) # Only if backend/fullstack
|
||||
Read(~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/rule-components.txt) # Only if frontend/fullstack
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Generate Rule Files
|
||||
|
||||
Create directory and write files:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir -p "{OUTPUT_DIR}"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Always Generate**:
|
||||
- core.md (from rule-core.txt template)
|
||||
- patterns.md (from rule-patterns.txt template)
|
||||
- testing.md (from rule-testing.txt template)
|
||||
- config.md (from rule-config.txt template)
|
||||
|
||||
**Conditional**:
|
||||
- api.md: Only if FRAMEWORK_TYPE == 'backend' or 'fullstack'
|
||||
- components.md: Only if FRAMEWORK_TYPE == 'frontend' or 'fullstack'
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Write Metadata
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"tech_stack": "{TECH_STACK_NAME}",
|
||||
"primary_lang": "{PRIMARY_LANG}",
|
||||
"file_ext": "{FILE_EXT}",
|
||||
"framework_type": "{FRAMEWORK_TYPE}",
|
||||
"components": ["{COMPONENTS}"],
|
||||
"generated_at": "{ISO_TIMESTAMP}",
|
||||
"source": "exa-research",
|
||||
"files_generated": ["core.md", "patterns.md", "testing.md", "config.md", ...]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Report Completion
|
||||
|
||||
Provide summary:
|
||||
- Files created with their path patterns
|
||||
- Exa queries executed (count)
|
||||
- Sources consulted (count)
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
1. Every .md file MUST start with `paths` YAML frontmatter
|
||||
2. Use {FILE_EXT} consistently across all rule files
|
||||
3. Synthesize Exa research into actionable rules
|
||||
4. Include code examples from Exa sources
|
||||
5. Keep each file focused on its specific domain
|
||||
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
|
||||
PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive multi-layer test enhancement suggestions
|
||||
- Success: Cover L0-L3 layers with focus on API, integration, and error scenarios
|
||||
- Scope: Files with coverage gaps identified in TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
- Goal: Provide specific, actionable test case suggestions that increase coverage completeness
|
||||
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• L1 (Unit Tests): Suggest edge cases, boundary conditions, error paths, state transitions
|
||||
• L2.1 (Integration): Suggest module interaction patterns, dependency injection scenarios
|
||||
• L2.2 (API Contracts): Suggest request/response test cases, validation, status codes, error responses
|
||||
• L2.4 (External APIs): Suggest mock strategies, failure scenarios, timeout handling, retry logic
|
||||
• L2.5 (Failure Modes): Suggest exception hierarchies, error propagation, recovery strategies
|
||||
• Cross-cutting: Suggest performance test cases, security considerations
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
|
||||
CONTEXT: @.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
Memory: Project type, test framework, existing test patterns, coverage gaps
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECTED: Markdown report with structured test enhancement suggestions organized by:
|
||||
1. File-level test requirements (per file needing tests)
|
||||
2. Layer-specific test cases (L1, L2.1, L2.2, L2.4, L2.5)
|
||||
3. Each suggestion includes:
|
||||
- Test type and layer (e.g., "L2.2 API Contract Test")
|
||||
- Specific test case description (e.g., "POST /api/users - Invalid email format")
|
||||
- Expected behavior (e.g., "Returns 400 with validation error message")
|
||||
- Dependencies/mocks needed (e.g., "Mock email service")
|
||||
- Success criteria (e.g., "Status 400, error.field === 'email'")
|
||||
4. Test ordering/dependencies (which tests should run first)
|
||||
5. Integration test strategies (how components interact)
|
||||
6. Error scenario matrix (all failure modes covered)
|
||||
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS:
|
||||
- Focus on identified coverage gaps from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
- Prioritize API tests, integration tests, and error scenarios
|
||||
- No code generation - suggestions only with sufficient detail for implementation
|
||||
- Consider project conventions and existing test patterns
|
||||
- Each suggestion should be actionable and specific (not generic)
|
||||
- Output format: Markdown with clear section headers
|
||||
@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze test coverage gaps and design comprehensive test generation strategy
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Read test-context-package.json to understand coverage gaps and framework
|
||||
• Study implementation context from source session summaries
|
||||
• Analyze existing test patterns and conventions
|
||||
• Design test requirements for missing coverage
|
||||
• Generate actionable test generation strategy
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @test-context-package.json @../../../{source-session-id}/.summaries/*.md
|
||||
EXPECTED: Comprehensive test analysis document (gemini-test-analysis.md) with test requirements, scenarios, and generation strategy
|
||||
RULES:
|
||||
- Focus on test requirements and strategy, NOT code generation
|
||||
- Study existing test patterns for consistency
|
||||
- Prioritize critical business logic tests
|
||||
- Specify clear test scenarios and coverage targets
|
||||
- Identify all dependencies requiring mocks
|
||||
- Output ONLY test analysis and generation strategy
|
||||
|
||||
## ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Implementation Understanding
|
||||
- Load all implementation summaries from source session
|
||||
- Understand implemented features, APIs, and business logic
|
||||
- Extract key functions, classes, and modules
|
||||
- Identify integration points and dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Existing Test Pattern Analysis
|
||||
- Study existing test files for patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Identify test structure (describe/it, test suites, fixtures)
|
||||
- Analyze assertion patterns and mocking strategies
|
||||
- Extract test setup/teardown patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Coverage Gap Assessment
|
||||
For each file in missing_tests[], analyze:
|
||||
- File purpose and functionality
|
||||
- Public APIs requiring test coverage
|
||||
- Critical paths and edge cases
|
||||
- Integration points requiring tests
|
||||
- Priority: high (core logic), medium (utilities), low (helpers)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Test Requirements Specification
|
||||
For each missing test file, specify:
|
||||
- Test scope: What needs to be tested
|
||||
- Test scenarios: Happy path, error cases, edge cases, integration
|
||||
- Test data: Required fixtures, mocks, test data
|
||||
- Dependencies: External services, databases, APIs to mock
|
||||
- Coverage targets: Functions/methods requiring tests
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Test Generation Strategy
|
||||
- Determine test generation approach for each file
|
||||
- Identify reusable test patterns from existing tests
|
||||
- Plan test data and fixture requirements
|
||||
- Define mocking strategy for dependencies
|
||||
- Specify expected test file structure
|
||||
|
||||
## EXPECTED OUTPUT FORMAT
|
||||
|
||||
Write comprehensive analysis to gemini-test-analysis.md:
|
||||
|
||||
# Test Generation Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Implementation Context Summary
|
||||
- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
|
||||
- **Implemented Features**: {feature_summary}
|
||||
- **Changed Files**: {list_of_implementation_files}
|
||||
- **Tech Stack**: {technologies_used}
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Test Coverage Assessment
|
||||
- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
|
||||
- **Missing Tests**: {count} files
|
||||
- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
|
||||
- **Priority Breakdown**:
|
||||
- High Priority: {count} files (core business logic)
|
||||
- Medium Priority: {count} files (utilities, helpers)
|
||||
- Low Priority: {count} files (configuration, constants)
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Existing Test Pattern Analysis
|
||||
- **Test Framework**: {framework_name_and_version}
|
||||
- **File Naming Convention**: {pattern}
|
||||
- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_or_other}
|
||||
- **Assertion Style**: {expect_assert_should}
|
||||
- **Mocking Strategy**: {mocking_framework_and_patterns}
|
||||
- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach_patterns}
|
||||
- **Test Data**: {fixtures_factories_builders}
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Test Requirements by File
|
||||
|
||||
### File: {implementation_file_path}
|
||||
**Test File**: {suggested_test_file_path}
|
||||
**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scope
|
||||
- {description_of_what_needs_testing}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Test Scenarios
|
||||
1. **Happy Path Tests**
|
||||
- {scenario_1}
|
||||
- {scenario_2}
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Error Handling Tests**
|
||||
- {error_scenario_1}
|
||||
- {error_scenario_2}
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Edge Case Tests**
|
||||
- {edge_case_1}
|
||||
- {edge_case_2}
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Integration Tests** (if applicable)
|
||||
- {integration_scenario_1}
|
||||
- {integration_scenario_2}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Test Data & Fixtures
|
||||
- {required_test_data}
|
||||
- {required_mocks}
|
||||
- {required_fixtures}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Dependencies to Mock
|
||||
- {external_service_1}
|
||||
- {external_service_2}
|
||||
|
||||
#### Coverage Targets
|
||||
- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
|
||||
- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
[Repeat for each missing test file]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Test Generation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Approach
|
||||
- {strategy_description}
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Generation Order
|
||||
1. {file_1} - {rationale}
|
||||
2. {file_2} - {rationale}
|
||||
3. {file_3} - {rationale}
|
||||
|
||||
### Reusable Patterns
|
||||
- {pattern_1_from_existing_tests}
|
||||
- {pattern_2_from_existing_tests}
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Data Strategy
|
||||
- {approach_to_test_data_and_fixtures}
|
||||
|
||||
### Mocking Strategy
|
||||
- {approach_to_mocking_dependencies}
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Criteria
|
||||
- Code coverage target: {percentage}%
|
||||
- Test scenarios per function: {count}
|
||||
- Integration test coverage: {approach}
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Implementation Targets
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Identify new test files to create
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: New test files only (no existing files to modify)
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Files to Create**:
|
||||
1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
|
||||
- **Type**: Create new test file
|
||||
- **Purpose**: Test TokenValidator class
|
||||
- **Scenarios**: 15 test cases covering validation logic, error handling, edge cases
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, test fixtures for tokens
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
|
||||
- **Type**: Create new test file
|
||||
- **Purpose**: Test error handling middleware
|
||||
- **Scenarios**: 8 test cases for different error types and response formats
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: Mock Express req/res/next, error fixtures
|
||||
|
||||
[List all test files to create]
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Success Metrics
|
||||
- **Test Coverage Goal**: {target_percentage}%
|
||||
- **Test Quality**: All scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
|
||||
- **Convention Compliance**: Follow existing test patterns
|
||||
- **Maintainability**: Clear test descriptions, reusable fixtures
|
||||
@@ -1,176 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Validate technical feasibility and identify implementation risks for proposed solution design.
|
||||
|
||||
## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
|
||||
□ Read context-package.json and gemini-solution-design.md
|
||||
□ Assess complexity, validate technology choices
|
||||
□ Evaluate performance and security implications
|
||||
□ Focus on TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY and RISK ASSESSMENT
|
||||
□ Write output to specified .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/ path
|
||||
|
||||
## PREREQUISITE ANALYSIS
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Input Files
|
||||
1. **context-package.json**: Task requirements, source files, tech stack
|
||||
2. **gemini-solution-design.md**: Proposed solution design and architecture
|
||||
3. **workflow-session.json**: Session state and context
|
||||
4. **CLAUDE.md**: Project standards and conventions
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis Dependencies
|
||||
- Review Gemini's proposed solution design
|
||||
- Validate against actual codebase capabilities
|
||||
- Assess implementation complexity realistically
|
||||
- Identify gaps between design and execution
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUIRED VALIDATION
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Feasibility Assessment
|
||||
- **Complexity Rating**: Rate technical complexity (1-5 scale)
|
||||
- 1: Trivial - straightforward implementation
|
||||
- 2: Simple - well-known patterns
|
||||
- 3: Moderate - some challenges
|
||||
- 4: Complex - significant challenges
|
||||
- 5: Very Complex - high risk, major unknowns
|
||||
|
||||
- **Resource Requirements**: Estimate development effort
|
||||
- Development time (hours/days/weeks)
|
||||
- Required expertise level
|
||||
- Infrastructure needs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Technology Compatibility**: Validate proposed tech stack
|
||||
- Framework version compatibility
|
||||
- Library maturity and support
|
||||
- Integration with existing systems
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Risk Analysis
|
||||
- **Implementation Risks**: Technical challenges and blockers
|
||||
- Unknown implementation patterns
|
||||
- Missing capabilities or APIs
|
||||
- Breaking changes to existing code
|
||||
|
||||
- **Integration Challenges**: System integration concerns
|
||||
- Data format compatibility
|
||||
- API contract changes
|
||||
- Dependency conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
- **Performance Concerns**: Performance and scalability risks
|
||||
- Resource consumption (CPU, memory, I/O)
|
||||
- Latency and throughput impact
|
||||
- Caching and optimization needs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Security Concerns**: Security vulnerabilities and threats
|
||||
- Authentication/authorization gaps
|
||||
- Data exposure risks
|
||||
- Compliance violations
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Implementation Validation
|
||||
- **Development Approach**: Validate proposed implementation strategy
|
||||
- Verify module dependency order
|
||||
- Assess incremental development feasibility
|
||||
- Evaluate testing approach
|
||||
|
||||
- **Quality Standards**: Validate quality requirements
|
||||
- Test coverage achievability
|
||||
- Performance benchmark realism
|
||||
- Documentation completeness
|
||||
|
||||
- **Maintenance Implications**: Long-term sustainability
|
||||
- Code maintainability assessment
|
||||
- Technical debt evaluation
|
||||
- Evolution and extensibility
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Code Target Verification
|
||||
Review Gemini's proposed code targets:
|
||||
- **Validate existing targets**: Confirm file:function:lines exist
|
||||
- **Assess new file targets**: Evaluate necessity and placement
|
||||
- **Identify missing targets**: Suggest additional modification points
|
||||
- **Refine target specifications**: Provide more precise line numbers if possible
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Recommendations
|
||||
- **Must-Have Requirements**: Critical requirements for success
|
||||
- **Optimization Opportunities**: Performance and quality improvements
|
||||
- **Security Controls**: Essential security measures
|
||||
- **Risk Mitigation**: Strategies to reduce identified risks
|
||||
|
||||
## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
### Output File
|
||||
**Path**: `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
|
||||
**Format**: Follow structure from `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/analysis-results-structure.txt`
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Sections
|
||||
Focus on these sections from the template:
|
||||
- Executive Summary (with Codex perspective)
|
||||
- Current State Analysis (validation findings)
|
||||
- Implementation Strategy (feasibility assessment)
|
||||
- Solution Optimization (risk mitigation)
|
||||
- Confidence Scores (technical feasibility focus)
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Guidelines
|
||||
- ✅ Focus on technical feasibility and risk assessment
|
||||
- ✅ Verify code targets from Gemini's design
|
||||
- ✅ Provide concrete risk mitigation strategies
|
||||
- ✅ Quantify complexity and effort estimates
|
||||
- ❌ Do NOT create task breakdowns
|
||||
- ❌ Do NOT provide step-by-step implementation guides
|
||||
- ❌ Do NOT include code examples
|
||||
|
||||
## VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
|
||||
|
||||
### Complexity Scoring
|
||||
Rate each aspect on 1-5 scale:
|
||||
- Technical Complexity
|
||||
- Integration Complexity
|
||||
- Performance Risk
|
||||
- Security Risk
|
||||
- Maintenance Burden
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Classification
|
||||
- **LOW**: Minor issues, easily addressable
|
||||
- **MEDIUM**: Manageable challenges with clear mitigation
|
||||
- **HIGH**: Significant concerns requiring major mitigation
|
||||
- **CRITICAL**: Fundamental viability threats
|
||||
|
||||
### Feasibility Judgment
|
||||
- **PROCEED**: Technically feasible with acceptable risk
|
||||
- **PROCEED_WITH_MODIFICATIONS**: Feasible but needs adjustments
|
||||
- **RECONSIDER**: High risk, major changes needed
|
||||
- **REJECT**: Not feasible with current approach
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT INTEGRATION
|
||||
|
||||
### Gemini Analysis Integration
|
||||
- Review proposed architecture and design decisions
|
||||
- Validate assumptions and technology choices
|
||||
- Cross-check code targets against actual codebase
|
||||
- Assess realism of performance targets
|
||||
|
||||
### Codebase Reality Check
|
||||
- Verify existing code capabilities
|
||||
- Identify actual technical constraints
|
||||
- Assess team skill compatibility
|
||||
- Evaluate infrastructure readiness
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Context
|
||||
- Consider session history and previous decisions
|
||||
- Align with project architecture standards
|
||||
- Respect existing patterns and conventions
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION MODE
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode**: Analysis with write permission for output file
|
||||
**CLI Tool**: Codex with --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
**Timeout**: 60-90 minutes for complex tasks
|
||||
**Output**: Single file codex-feasibility-validation.md
|
||||
**Trigger**: Only for complex tasks (>6 modules)
|
||||
|
||||
## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
|
||||
□ context-package.json and gemini-solution-design.md read
|
||||
□ Complexity rated on 1-5 scale with justification
|
||||
□ All risk categories assessed (technical, integration, performance, security)
|
||||
□ Code targets verified and refined
|
||||
□ Risk mitigation strategies provided
|
||||
□ Resource requirements estimated
|
||||
□ Final feasibility judgment (PROCEED/RECONSIDER/REJECT)
|
||||
□ Output written to .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
|
||||
|
||||
Focus: Technical feasibility validation with realistic risk assessment and mitigation strategies.
|
||||
@@ -1,131 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Analyze and design optimal solution with comprehensive architecture evaluation and design decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
|
||||
□ Read context-package.json to understand task requirements, source files, tech stack
|
||||
□ Analyze current architecture patterns and code structure
|
||||
□ Propose solution design with key decisions and rationale
|
||||
□ Focus on SOLUTION IMPROVEMENTS and KEY DESIGN DECISIONS
|
||||
□ Write output to specified .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/ path
|
||||
|
||||
## ANALYSIS PRIORITY
|
||||
|
||||
### Source Hierarchy
|
||||
1. **PRIMARY**: Individual role analysis.md files (system-architect, ui-designer, data-architect, etc.)
|
||||
- Technical details and implementation considerations
|
||||
- Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
|
||||
- Design decision context and rationale
|
||||
|
||||
2. **SECONDARY**: role analysis documents
|
||||
- Integrated requirements across roles
|
||||
- Cross-role alignment and dependencies
|
||||
- Unified feature specifications
|
||||
|
||||
3. **REFERENCE**: guidance-specification.md
|
||||
- Discussion context and background
|
||||
- Initial problem framing
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Current State Assessment
|
||||
- Identify existing architectural patterns and code structure
|
||||
- Map integration points and dependencies
|
||||
- Evaluate technical debt and pain points
|
||||
- Assess framework compatibility and constraints
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Solution Design
|
||||
- Propose core architecture principles and approach
|
||||
- Design component architecture and data flow
|
||||
- Specify API contracts and integration strategy
|
||||
- Define technology stack with justification
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Key Design Decisions
|
||||
For each critical decision:
|
||||
- **Decision**: What is being decided
|
||||
- **Rationale**: Why this approach
|
||||
- **Alternatives Considered**: Other options and their tradeoffs
|
||||
- **Impact**: Implications on architecture, performance, maintainability
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum 2 key decisions required.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Code Modification Targets
|
||||
Identify specific code locations for changes:
|
||||
- **Existing files**: `file:function:lines` format (e.g., `src/auth/login.ts:validateUser:45-52`)
|
||||
- **New files**: `file` only (e.g., `src/auth/PasswordReset.ts`)
|
||||
- **Unknown lines**: `file:function:*` (e.g., `src/auth/service.ts:refreshToken:*`)
|
||||
|
||||
For each target:
|
||||
- Type: Modify existing | Create new
|
||||
- Modification/Purpose: What changes needed
|
||||
- Rationale: Why this target
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Critical Insights
|
||||
- Strengths: What works well in current/proposed design
|
||||
- Gaps: Missing capabilities or concerns
|
||||
- Risks: Technical, integration, performance, security
|
||||
- Optimization Opportunities: Performance, security, code quality
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Feasibility Assessment
|
||||
- Technical Complexity: Rating and analysis
|
||||
- Performance Impact: Expected characteristics
|
||||
- Resource Requirements: Development effort
|
||||
- Maintenance Burden: Ongoing considerations
|
||||
|
||||
## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
### Output File
|
||||
**Path**: `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
|
||||
**Format**: Follow structure from `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/analysis-results-structure.txt`
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Sections
|
||||
- Executive Summary with feasibility score
|
||||
- Current State Analysis
|
||||
- Proposed Solution Design with 2+ key decisions
|
||||
- Implementation Strategy with code targets
|
||||
- Solution Optimization (performance, security, quality)
|
||||
- Critical Success Factors
|
||||
- Confidence Scores with recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Guidelines
|
||||
- ✅ Focus on solution improvements and key design decisions
|
||||
- ✅ Include rationale, alternatives, and tradeoffs for decisions
|
||||
- ✅ Provide specific code targets in correct format
|
||||
- ✅ Quantify assessments with scores (X/5)
|
||||
- ❌ Do NOT create task lists or implementation steps
|
||||
- ❌ Do NOT include code examples or snippets
|
||||
- ❌ Do NOT create project management timelines
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT INTEGRATION
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Context
|
||||
- Load context-package.json for task requirements
|
||||
- Reference workflow-session.json for session state
|
||||
- Review CLAUDE.md for project standards
|
||||
|
||||
### Brainstorm Context
|
||||
If brainstorming artifacts exist:
|
||||
- Prioritize individual role analysis.md files
|
||||
- Use role analysis documents for integrated view
|
||||
- Reference guidance-specification.md for context
|
||||
|
||||
### Codebase Context
|
||||
- Identify similar patterns in existing code
|
||||
- Evaluate success/failure of current approaches
|
||||
- Ensure consistency with project architecture
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION MODE
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode**: Analysis with write permission for output file
|
||||
**CLI Tool**: Gemini wrapper with --approval-mode yolo
|
||||
**Timeout**: 40-60 minutes based on complexity
|
||||
**Output**: Single file gemini-solution-design.md
|
||||
|
||||
## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
|
||||
□ context-package.json read and analyzed
|
||||
□ All 7 required sections present in output
|
||||
□ 2+ key design decisions with rationale and alternatives
|
||||
□ Code targets specified in correct format
|
||||
□ Feasibility scores provided (X/5)
|
||||
□ Final recommendation (PROCEED/RECONSIDER/REJECT)
|
||||
□ Output written to .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
|
||||
|
||||
Focus: Comprehensive solution design emphasizing architecture decisions and critical insights.
|
||||
@@ -1,286 +0,0 @@
|
||||
IMPL_PLAN.md Template - Implementation Plan Document Structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Frontmatter
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
identifier: WFS-{session-id}
|
||||
source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
|
||||
analysis: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
artifacts: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.brainstorming/
|
||||
context_package: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json # CCW smart context
|
||||
workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design" # Indicates execution model
|
||||
verification_history: # CCW quality gates
|
||||
concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
|
||||
action_plan_verify: "pending"
|
||||
phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → analysis → concept_verify → planning" # CCW workflow phases
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Structure
|
||||
|
||||
# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Summary
|
||||
Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Objectives**:
|
||||
- [Key objective 1]
|
||||
- [Key objective 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Approach**:
|
||||
- [High-level approach]
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Context Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### CCW Workflow Context
|
||||
**Phase Progression**:
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (role analyses generated)
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 3: Enhanced Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel insights)
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 4: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, role analyses updated | skipped)
|
||||
- ⏳ Phase 5: Action Planning (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Gates**:
|
||||
- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (0 ambiguities remaining) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
|
||||
- plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Package Summary**:
|
||||
- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
|
||||
- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
|
||||
- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
|
||||
- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {dependency count} dependencies identified
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Profile
|
||||
- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
|
||||
- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
|
||||
- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
|
||||
- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
|
||||
|
||||
### Module Structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
[Directory tree showing key modules]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependencies
|
||||
**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
|
||||
**APIs**: [External services]
|
||||
**Development**: [Testing, linting, CI/CD tools]
|
||||
|
||||
### Patterns & Conventions
|
||||
- **Architecture**: [Key patterns like DI, Event-Driven]
|
||||
- **Component Design**: [Design patterns]
|
||||
- **State Management**: [State strategy]
|
||||
- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Artifact Usage Strategy
|
||||
**Primary Reference (role analyses)**:
|
||||
- **What**: Role-specific analyses from brainstorming providing multi-perspective insights
|
||||
- **When**: Every task references relevant role analyses for requirements and design decisions
|
||||
- **How**: Extract requirements, architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns from applicable role documents
|
||||
- **Priority**: Collective authoritative source - multiple role perspectives provide comprehensive coverage
|
||||
- **CCW Value**: Maintains role-specific expertise while enabling cross-role integration during planning
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
|
||||
- **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
|
||||
- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure
|
||||
- **Usage**: Tasks load this via `flow_control.preparatory_steps` for environment setup
|
||||
- **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
|
||||
- **What**: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel analysis results
|
||||
- **Content**: Optimization strategies, risk assessment, architecture review, implementation patterns
|
||||
- **Usage**: Referenced in task planning for technical guidance and risk mitigation
|
||||
- **CCW Value**: Multi-model parallel analysis providing comprehensive technical intelligence
|
||||
|
||||
### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
|
||||
- **role analyses**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
|
||||
- Contains: Architecture design, UI/UX guidelines, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation roadmap, risk assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
|
||||
- **guidance-specification.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
|
||||
- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Detailed architecture specifications
|
||||
- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Layout and component specifications
|
||||
- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Product vision and user stories
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifact Priority in Development**:
|
||||
1. role analyses (primary reference for all tasks)
|
||||
2. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
|
||||
3. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis and optimization strategies)
|
||||
4. Role-specific analyses (fallback for detailed specifications)
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Strategy
|
||||
**Execution Model**: [Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles]
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale**: [Why this execution model fits the project]
|
||||
|
||||
**Parallelization Opportunities**:
|
||||
- [List independent workstreams]
|
||||
|
||||
**Serialization Requirements**:
|
||||
- [List critical dependencies]
|
||||
|
||||
### Architectural Approach
|
||||
**Key Architecture Decisions**:
|
||||
- [ADR references from role analyses]
|
||||
- [Justification for architecture patterns]
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Strategy**:
|
||||
- [How modules communicate]
|
||||
- [State management approach]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Dependencies
|
||||
**Task Dependency Graph**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
[High-level dependency visualization]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Strategy
|
||||
**Testing Approach**:
|
||||
- Unit testing: [Tools, scope]
|
||||
- Integration testing: [Key integration points]
|
||||
- E2E testing: [Critical user flows]
|
||||
|
||||
**Coverage Targets**:
|
||||
- Lines: ≥70%
|
||||
- Functions: ≥70%
|
||||
- Branches: ≥65%
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Gates**:
|
||||
- [CI/CD gates]
|
||||
- [Performance budgets]
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Task Breakdown Summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Count
|
||||
**{N} tasks** (flat hierarchy | two-level hierarchy, sequential | parallel execution)
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Structure
|
||||
- **IMPL-1**: [Main task title]
|
||||
- **IMPL-2**: [Main task title]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
### Complexity Assessment
|
||||
- **High**: [List with rationale]
|
||||
- **Medium**: [List]
|
||||
- **Low**: [List]
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependencies
|
||||
[Reference Section 4.3 for dependency graph]
|
||||
|
||||
**Parallelization Opportunities**:
|
||||
- [Specific task groups that can run in parallel]
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): [Phase Name]**
|
||||
- **Tasks**: IMPL-1, IMPL-2
|
||||
- **Deliverables**:
|
||||
- [Specific deliverable 1]
|
||||
- [Specific deliverable 2]
|
||||
- **Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- [Measurable criterion]
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): [Phase Name]**
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
### Resource Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Development Team**:
|
||||
- [Team composition and skills]
|
||||
|
||||
**External Dependencies**:
|
||||
- [Third-party services, APIs]
|
||||
|
||||
**Infrastructure**:
|
||||
- [Development, staging, production environments]
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
|
||||
|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
|
||||
| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Strategy] | [Role] |
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Risks** (High impact + High probability):
|
||||
- [Risk 1]: [Detailed mitigation plan]
|
||||
|
||||
**Monitoring Strategy**:
|
||||
- [How risks will be monitored]
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Completeness**:
|
||||
- [ ] All requirements from role analyses implemented
|
||||
- [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Quality**:
|
||||
- [ ] Test coverage ≥70%
|
||||
- [ ] Bundle size within budget
|
||||
- [ ] Performance targets met
|
||||
|
||||
**Operational Readiness**:
|
||||
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
|
||||
- [ ] Monitoring and logging configured
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Business Metrics**:
|
||||
- [ ] [Key business metrics from role analyses]
|
||||
|
||||
## Template Usage Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
### When Generating IMPL_PLAN.md
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Fill Frontmatter Variables**:
|
||||
- Replace {session-id} with actual session ID
|
||||
- Set workflow_type based on planning phase
|
||||
- Update verification_history based on concept-verify results
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Populate CCW Workflow Context**:
|
||||
- Extract file/module counts from context-package.json
|
||||
- Document phase progression based on completed workflow steps
|
||||
- Update quality gate status (passed/skipped/pending)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Extract from Analysis Results**:
|
||||
- Core objectives from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
- Technical approach and architecture decisions
|
||||
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Reference Brainstorming Artifacts**:
|
||||
- List detected artifacts with correct paths
|
||||
- Document artifact priority and usage strategy
|
||||
- Map artifacts to specific tasks based on domain
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Define Implementation Strategy**:
|
||||
- Choose execution model (sequential/parallel/phased)
|
||||
- Identify parallelization opportunities
|
||||
- Document critical path and dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Break Down Tasks**:
|
||||
- List all task IDs and titles
|
||||
- Assess complexity (high/medium/low)
|
||||
- Create dependency graph visualization
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Set Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- Extract from role analyses
|
||||
- Include measurable metrics
|
||||
- Define quality gates
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before finalizing IMPL_PLAN.md:
|
||||
- [ ] All frontmatter fields populated correctly
|
||||
- [ ] CCW workflow context reflects actual phase progression
|
||||
- [ ] Brainstorming artifacts correctly referenced
|
||||
- [ ] Task breakdown matches generated task JSONs
|
||||
- [ ] Dependencies are acyclic and logical
|
||||
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||
- [ ] Risk assessment includes mitigation strategies
|
||||
- [ ] All {placeholder} variables replaced with actual values
|
||||
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Template for generating conflict-patterns.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Document recurring conflict patterns across workflow sessions with resolutions.
|
||||
|
||||
## File Location
|
||||
`.claude/skills/workflow-progress/conflict-patterns.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Update Strategy
|
||||
- **Incremental mode**: Add new conflicts, update frequency counters for existing patterns
|
||||
- **Full mode**: Regenerate entire conflict analysis from all sessions
|
||||
|
||||
## Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Workflow Conflict Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
### {Conflict_Pattern_Title}
|
||||
**Pattern**: {concise_pattern_description}
|
||||
**Sessions**: {session_id_1}, {session_id_2}
|
||||
**Resolution**: {resolution_strategy}
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Impact**:
|
||||
- Modified: {file_path_1}, {file_path_2}
|
||||
- Added: {file_path_3}
|
||||
- Tests: {test_file_path}
|
||||
|
||||
**Frequency**: {count} sessions
|
||||
**Severity**: {high|medium|low}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
### {Conflict_Pattern_Title}
|
||||
**Pattern**: {concise_pattern_description}
|
||||
**Sessions**: {session_id_list}
|
||||
**Resolution**: {resolution_strategy}
|
||||
|
||||
**Package Changes**:
|
||||
- Updated: {package_name}@{version}
|
||||
- Locked: {dependency_name}
|
||||
|
||||
**Frequency**: {count} sessions
|
||||
**Severity**: {high|medium|low}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
### {Conflict_Pattern_Title}
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
### {Conflict_Pattern_Title}
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Sources
|
||||
- IMPL_PLAN summaries: `.workflow/.archives/{session_id}/IMPL_PLAN.md`
|
||||
- Context packages: `.workflow/.archives/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json` (reference only)
|
||||
- Session lessons: `manifest.json` -> `archives[].lessons.challenges`
|
||||
|
||||
## Conflict Identification (Use CCW CLI)
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Pattern**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Identify conflict patterns from workflow sessions
|
||||
TASK: • Extract conflicts from IMPL_PLAN and lessons • Group by type (architecture/dependencies/testing/performance) • Identify recurring patterns (same conflict in different sessions) • Link resolutions to specific sessions
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.archives/*/IMPL_PLAN.md @.workflow/.archives/manifest.json
|
||||
EXPECTED: Conflict patterns with frequency and resolution
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule workflow-skill-aggregation --cd .workflow/.archives
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Pattern Grouping**:
|
||||
- **Architecture**: Design conflicts, incompatible strategies, interface mismatches
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: Version conflicts, library incompatibilities, package issues
|
||||
- **Testing**: Mock data inconsistencies, test environment issues, coverage gaps
|
||||
- **Performance**: Bottlenecks, optimization conflicts, resource issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Formatting Rules
|
||||
- Sort by frequency within each category
|
||||
- Include code impact for traceability
|
||||
- Mark high-frequency patterns (3+ sessions) as "RECURRING"
|
||||
- Keep resolution descriptions actionable
|
||||
- Use relative paths for file references
|
||||
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Template for generating lessons-learned.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Aggregate lessons learned from workflow sessions, categorized by functional domain and severity.
|
||||
|
||||
## File Location
|
||||
`.claude/skills/workflow-progress/lessons-learned.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Update Strategy
|
||||
- **Incremental mode**: Merge new session lessons into existing categories, update frequencies
|
||||
- **Full mode**: Regenerate entire lessons document from all sessions
|
||||
|
||||
## Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Workflow Lessons Learned
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices (Successes)
|
||||
|
||||
### {Domain_Category}
|
||||
- {success_pattern_1} (sessions: {session_id_1}, {session_id_2})
|
||||
- {success_pattern_2} (sessions: {session_id_3})
|
||||
|
||||
### {Domain_Category_2}
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Known Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
### High Priority
|
||||
- **{challenge_title}**: {description}
|
||||
- Affected sessions: {session_id_1}, {session_id_2}
|
||||
- Resolution: {resolution_strategy}
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium Priority
|
||||
- **{challenge_title}**: {description}
|
||||
- Affected sessions: {session_id_3}
|
||||
- Resolution: {resolution_strategy}
|
||||
|
||||
### Low Priority
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Watch Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical (3+ sessions)
|
||||
1. **{pattern_name}**: {description}
|
||||
- Frequency: {count} sessions
|
||||
- Affected: {session_list}
|
||||
- Mitigation: {mitigation_strategy}
|
||||
|
||||
### High Priority (2 sessions)
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
### Normal (1 session)
|
||||
...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Sources
|
||||
- Lessons: `manifest.json` -> `archives[].lessons.{successes|challenges|watch_patterns}`
|
||||
- Session metadata: `.workflow/.archives/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`
|
||||
|
||||
## Aggregation Rules (Use CCW CLI)
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Pattern**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Aggregate workflow lessons from session data
|
||||
TASK: • Group successes by functional domain • Categorize challenges by severity (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) • Identify watch patterns with frequency >= 2 • Mark CRITICAL patterns (3+ sessions)
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.archives/manifest.json
|
||||
EXPECTED: Aggregated lessons with frequency counts
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule workflow-skill-aggregation --cd .workflow/.archives
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity Classification**:
|
||||
- **HIGH**: Blocked development >4 hours OR repeated in 3+ sessions
|
||||
- **MEDIUM**: Required significant rework OR repeated in 2 sessions
|
||||
- **LOW**: Minor issues resolved quickly
|
||||
|
||||
**Pattern Identification**:
|
||||
- Successes in 3+ sessions → "Best Practices"
|
||||
- Challenges repeated 2+ times → "Known Issues"
|
||||
- Watch patterns frequency >= 2 → "High Priority Warnings"
|
||||
- Watch patterns frequency >= 3 → "CRITICAL"
|
||||
|
||||
## Formatting Rules
|
||||
- Sort by frequency (most common first)
|
||||
- Include session references for traceability
|
||||
- Use bold for challenge titles
|
||||
- Keep descriptions concise but actionable
|
||||
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Analysis Mode Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
## Mode Definition
|
||||
**Mode**: `analysis` (READ-ONLY)
|
||||
## Prompt Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: [development goal]
|
||||
TASK: [specific implementation task]
|
||||
MODE: [auto|write]
|
||||
CONTEXT: [file patterns]
|
||||
EXPECTED: [deliverables]
|
||||
RULES: [templates | additional constraints]
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Operation Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### ALLOWED Operations
|
||||
- **READ**: All CONTEXT files and analyze content
|
||||
- **ANALYZE**: Code patterns, architecture, dependencies
|
||||
- **GENERATE**: Text output, insights, recommendations
|
||||
- **DOCUMENT**: Analysis results in output response only
|
||||
|
||||
### FORBIDDEN Operations
|
||||
- **NO FILE CREATION**: Cannot create any files on disk
|
||||
- **NO FILE MODIFICATION**: Cannot modify existing files
|
||||
- **NO FILE DELETION**: Cannot delete any files
|
||||
- **NO DIRECTORY OPERATIONS**: Cannot create/modify directories
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL**: Absolutely NO file system operations - OUTPUT ONLY
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Parse** all 6 fields (PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES)
|
||||
2. **Read** and analyze CONTEXT files thoroughly
|
||||
3. **Identify** patterns, issues, and dependencies
|
||||
4. **Generate** insights and recommendations
|
||||
5. **Validate** EXPECTED deliverables met
|
||||
6. **Output** structured analysis (text response only)
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
- Analyze ALL CONTEXT files completely
|
||||
- Apply RULES (templates + constraints) exactly
|
||||
- Provide code evidence with `file:line` references
|
||||
- List all related/analyzed files at output beginning
|
||||
- Match EXPECTED deliverables precisely
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
- Assume behavior without code verification
|
||||
- Ignore CONTEXT file patterns
|
||||
- Skip RULES or templates
|
||||
- Make unsubstantiated claims
|
||||
- Create/modify/delete any files
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES Processing
|
||||
|
||||
- Parse RULES field to extract template content and constraints
|
||||
- Recognize `|` as separator: `template content | additional constraints`
|
||||
- Apply ALL template guidelines as mandatory
|
||||
- Treat rule violations as task failures
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
**File Not Found**: Report missing files, continue with available, note in output
|
||||
**Invalid CONTEXT Pattern**: Report invalid pattern, request correction, do not guess
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Standards
|
||||
|
||||
- **Thoroughness**: Analyze ALL files, check cross-file patterns, quantify metrics
|
||||
- **Evidence-Based**: Quote code with `file:line`, link patterns, support claims with examples
|
||||
- **Actionable**: Clear recommendations, prioritized by impact, incremental changes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Format Priority
|
||||
|
||||
**If template defines output format** → Follow template format EXACTLY
|
||||
|
||||
**If template has no format** → Use default format below
|
||||
|
||||
### Default Analysis Output
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Analysis: [TASK Title]
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Files
|
||||
- `path/to/file1.ext` - [Brief description of relevance]
|
||||
- `path/to/file2.ext` - [Brief description of relevance]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
[2-3 sentence overview]
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Findings
|
||||
1. [Finding] - path/to/file:123
|
||||
2. [Finding] - path/to/file:456
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Analysis
|
||||
[Evidence-based analysis with code quotes]
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
1. [Actionable recommendation]
|
||||
2. [Actionable recommendation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Code References
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: `path/to/file:line_number`
|
||||
**Example**: `src/auth/jwt.ts:45` - Authentication uses deprecated algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All CONTEXT files analyzed
|
||||
- [ ] Code evidence with `file:line` references
|
||||
- [ ] Specific, actionable recommendations
|
||||
- [ ] No unsubstantiated claims
|
||||
- [ ] EXPECTED deliverables met
|
||||
@@ -1,136 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Write Mode Protocol
|
||||
## Prompt Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: [development goal]
|
||||
TASK: [specific implementation task]
|
||||
MODE: [auto|write]
|
||||
CONTEXT: [file patterns]
|
||||
EXPECTED: [deliverables]
|
||||
RULES: [templates | additional constraints]
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Operation Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### MODE: write
|
||||
- **READ**: All CONTEXT files and analyze content
|
||||
- **CREATE**: New files (documentation, code, configuration)
|
||||
- **MODIFY**: Existing files (update content, refactor code)
|
||||
- **DELETE**: Files when explicitly required
|
||||
|
||||
**Restrictions**: Follow project conventions, cannot break existing functionality
|
||||
|
||||
**Constraint**: Must test every change
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
### MODE: write
|
||||
1. **Parse** all 6 fields (PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES)
|
||||
2. **Read** CONTEXT files, find 3+ similar patterns
|
||||
3. **Plan** implementation following RULES
|
||||
4. **Execute** requested file operations
|
||||
5. **Validate** changes
|
||||
6. **Report** file changes
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
- Study CONTEXT files - find 3+ similar patterns before implementing
|
||||
- Apply RULES exactly
|
||||
- Test continuously (auto mode)
|
||||
- Commit incrementally (auto mode)
|
||||
- Match project style exactly
|
||||
- List all created/modified files at output beginning
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
- Make assumptions without code verification
|
||||
- Ignore existing patterns
|
||||
- Skip tests (auto mode)
|
||||
- Use clever tricks over boring solutions
|
||||
- Break backward compatibility
|
||||
- Exceed 3 failed attempts without stopping
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**Three-Attempt Rule**: On 3rd failure, stop and report what attempted, what failed, root cause
|
||||
|
||||
| Error Type | Response |
|
||||
|------------|----------|
|
||||
| Syntax/Type | Review → Fix → Re-run tests |
|
||||
| Runtime | Analyze stack → Add handling → Test |
|
||||
| Test Failure | Debug → Review setup → Fix |
|
||||
| Build Failure | Check messages → Fix incrementally |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Format Priority
|
||||
|
||||
**If template defines output format** → Follow template format EXACTLY
|
||||
|
||||
**If template has no format** → Use default format below
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Implementation: [TASK Title]
|
||||
|
||||
## Changes
|
||||
- Created: `path/to/file1.ext` (X lines)
|
||||
- Modified: `path/to/file2.ext` (+Y/-Z lines)
|
||||
- Deleted: `path/to/file3.ext`
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
[2-3 sentence overview]
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
1. [Decision] - Rationale and reference to similar pattern
|
||||
2. [Decision] - path/to/reference:line
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Details
|
||||
[Evidence-based description with code references]
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
- Tests written: X new tests
|
||||
- Tests passing: Y/Z tests
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation
|
||||
✅ Tests: X passing
|
||||
✅ Build: Success
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
[Recommendations if any]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Partial Completion
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Task Status: Partially Completed
|
||||
|
||||
## Completed
|
||||
- [What worked]
|
||||
- Files: `path/to/completed.ext`
|
||||
|
||||
## Blocked
|
||||
- **Issue**: [What failed]
|
||||
- **Root Cause**: [Analysis]
|
||||
- **Attempted**: [Solutions tried - attempt X of 3]
|
||||
|
||||
## Required
|
||||
[What's needed to proceed]
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendation
|
||||
[Suggested next steps]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Code References
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: `path/to/file:line_number`
|
||||
**Example**: `src/auth/jwt.ts:45` - Implemented following pattern from `src/auth/session.ts:78`
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All tests pass
|
||||
- [ ] Build succeeds
|
||||
- [ ] All EXPECTED deliverables met
|
||||
- [ ] Code follows existing patterns
|
||||
- [ ] File changes listed at beginning
|
||||
@@ -1,151 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Conflict Resolution Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for conflict detection, strategy generation, and resolution output",
|
||||
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["conflicts", "summary"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"conflicts": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "brief", "severity", "category", "strategies", "recommended"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^CON-\\d{3}$",
|
||||
"description": "Conflict ID (CON-001, CON-002, ...)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"brief": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "一句话冲突摘要（中文）"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"severity": {
|
||||
"enum": ["Critical", "High", "Medium"],
|
||||
"description": "冲突严重程度"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"category": {
|
||||
"enum": ["Architecture", "API", "Data", "Dependency", "ModuleOverlap"],
|
||||
"description": "冲突类型"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"affected_files": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "受影响的文件路径"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "详细冲突描述"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"impact": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"scope": { "type": "string", "description": "影响的模块/组件" },
|
||||
"compatibility": { "enum": ["Yes", "No", "Partial"] },
|
||||
"migration_required": { "type": "boolean" },
|
||||
"estimated_effort": { "type": "string", "description": "人天估计" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"overlap_analysis": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "仅当 category=ModuleOverlap 时需要",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"new_module": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"scenarios": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"responsibilities": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"existing_modules": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"file": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"name": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"scenarios": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"overlap_scenarios": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"responsibilities": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"strategies": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"minItems": 2,
|
||||
"maxItems": 4,
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["name", "approach", "complexity", "risk", "effort", "pros", "cons"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": { "type": "string", "description": "策略名称（中文）" },
|
||||
"approach": { "type": "string", "description": "实现方法简述" },
|
||||
"complexity": { "enum": ["Low", "Medium", "High"] },
|
||||
"risk": { "enum": ["Low", "Medium", "High"] },
|
||||
"effort": { "type": "string", "description": "时间估计" },
|
||||
"pros": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "优点" },
|
||||
"cons": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "缺点" },
|
||||
"clarification_needed": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "需要用户澄清的问题（尤其是 ModuleOverlap）"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"modifications": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["file", "section", "change_type", "old_content", "new_content", "rationale"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"file": { "type": "string", "description": "相对项目根目录的完整路径" },
|
||||
"section": { "type": "string", "description": "Markdown heading 用于定位" },
|
||||
"change_type": { "enum": ["update", "add", "remove"] },
|
||||
"old_content": { "type": "string", "description": "原始内容片段（20-100字符，用于唯一匹配）" },
|
||||
"new_content": { "type": "string", "description": "修改后的内容" },
|
||||
"rationale": { "type": "string", "description": "修改理由" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommended": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"description": "推荐策略索引（0-based）"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"modification_suggestions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"minItems": 2,
|
||||
"maxItems": 5,
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "自定义处理建议（2-5条，中文）"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["total", "critical", "high", "medium"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"total": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"critical": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"high": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"medium": { "type": "integer" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_quality_standards": {
|
||||
"modifications": [
|
||||
"old_content: 20-100字符，确保 Edit 工具能唯一匹配",
|
||||
"new_content: 保持 markdown 格式",
|
||||
"change_type: update(替换), add(插入), remove(删除)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"user_facing_text": "brief, name, pros, cons, modification_suggestions 使用中文",
|
||||
"technical_fields": "severity, category, complexity, risk 使用英文"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,127 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Debug Log Entry Schema",
|
||||
"description": "NDJSON log entry for hypothesis-driven debugging workflow",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"sessionId",
|
||||
"runId",
|
||||
"hypothesisId",
|
||||
"location",
|
||||
"message",
|
||||
"data",
|
||||
"timestamp"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"sessionId": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^DBG-[a-z0-9-]+-\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$",
|
||||
"description": "Debug session identifier (e.g., 'DBG-stack-length-not-found-2025-12-18')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"runId": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^run-\\d+$",
|
||||
"description": "Reproduction run number (e.g., 'run-1', 'run-2')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"hypothesisId": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^H\\d+$",
|
||||
"description": "Hypothesis identifier being tested (e.g., 'H1', 'H2')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"location": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Code location in format 'file:function:line' or 'file:line'"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"message": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Human-readable description of what's being logged"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"data": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"additionalProperties": true,
|
||||
"description": "Captured values for hypothesis validation",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"keys_sample": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Sample of dictionary/object keys (first 30)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"value": {
|
||||
"description": "Captured value (any type)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"expected_value": {
|
||||
"description": "Expected value for comparison"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actual_type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Actual type of captured value"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Count of items (for arrays/collections)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"is_null": {
|
||||
"type": "boolean",
|
||||
"description": "Whether value is null/None"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"is_empty": {
|
||||
"type": "boolean",
|
||||
"description": "Whether collection is empty"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"comparison_result": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["match", "mismatch", "partial_match"],
|
||||
"description": "Result of value comparison"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Unix timestamp in milliseconds"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"severity": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["debug", "info", "warning", "error"],
|
||||
"default": "info",
|
||||
"description": "Log severity level"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"stack_trace": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Stack trace if capturing exception context"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"parent_entry_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Reference to parent log entry for nested contexts"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"examples": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "DBG-stack-length-not-found-2025-12-18",
|
||||
"runId": "run-1",
|
||||
"hypothesisId": "H1",
|
||||
"location": "rmxprt_api/core/rmxprt_parameter.py:sync_from_machine:642",
|
||||
"message": "Inspect stator keys from machine.to_dict and compare Stack Length vs Length",
|
||||
"data": {
|
||||
"keys_sample": ["Length", "Outer Diameter", "Inner Diameter", "Slot"],
|
||||
"stack_length_value": "未找到",
|
||||
"length_value": "120mm",
|
||||
"comparison_result": "mismatch"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"timestamp": 1734523456789
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sessionId": "DBG-registered-zero-2025-12-18",
|
||||
"runId": "run-1",
|
||||
"hypothesisId": "H2",
|
||||
"location": "rmxprt_api/utils/param_core.py:update_variables_from_result_model:670",
|
||||
"message": "Check result parameters count and sample keys",
|
||||
"data": {
|
||||
"count": 0,
|
||||
"is_empty": true,
|
||||
"sections_parsed": ["Stator", "Rotor", "General"],
|
||||
"expected_count": 145
|
||||
},
|
||||
"timestamp": 1734523457123
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,234 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Diagnosis Context Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Bug diagnosis results from cli-explore-agent for root cause analysis",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"symptom",
|
||||
"root_cause",
|
||||
"affected_files",
|
||||
"reproduction_steps",
|
||||
"fix_hints",
|
||||
"dependencies",
|
||||
"constraints",
|
||||
"clarification_needs",
|
||||
"_metadata"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"symptom": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["description", "error_message"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Human-readable description of the bug symptoms"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"error_message": {
|
||||
"type": ["string", "null"],
|
||||
"description": "Exact error message if available, null if no specific error"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"stack_trace": {
|
||||
"type": ["string", "null"],
|
||||
"description": "Stack trace excerpt if available"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"frequency": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["always", "intermittent", "rare", "unknown"],
|
||||
"description": "How often the bug occurs"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"user_impact": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "How the bug affects end users"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Observable symptoms and error manifestation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"root_cause": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["file", "issue", "confidence"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "File path where the root cause is located"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"line_range": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Line range containing the bug (e.g., '45-60')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"function": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Function or method name containing the bug"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"issue": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Description of what's wrong in the code"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"confidence": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Confidence score 0.0-1.0 (0.8+ high, 0.5-0.8 medium, <0.5 low)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"introduced_by": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Commit hash or date when bug was introduced (if known)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"category": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["logic_error", "edge_case", "race_condition", "null_reference", "type_mismatch", "resource_leak", "validation", "integration", "configuration", "other"],
|
||||
"description": "Bug category classification"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Root cause analysis with confidence score"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"affected_files": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"oneOf": [
|
||||
{"type": "string"},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["path", "relevance"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"path": {"type": "string", "description": "File path relative to project root"},
|
||||
"relevance": {"type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1, "description": "Relevance score 0.0-1.0 (0.7+ high, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low)"},
|
||||
"rationale": {"type": "string", "description": "Brief explanation of why this file is affected from this diagnosis angle"},
|
||||
"change_type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["fix_target", "needs_update", "test_coverage", "reference_only"],
|
||||
"description": "Type of change needed for this file"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Files affected by the bug. Prefer object format with relevance scores for synthesis prioritization."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reproduction_steps": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Step-by-step instructions to reproduce the bug"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"fix_hints": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["description", "approach"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "What needs to be fixed"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"approach": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Suggested fix approach with specific guidance"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"code_example": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Example code snippet showing the fix pattern"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"risk": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high"],
|
||||
"description": "Risk level of implementing this fix"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Actionable fix suggestions from this diagnosis angle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependencies": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "External and internal dependencies relevant to the bug"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"constraints": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Technical constraints and limitations affecting the fix"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"related_issues": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["similar_bug", "regression", "related_feature", "tech_debt"],
|
||||
"description": "Relationship type"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reference": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Issue ID, commit hash, or file reference"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Brief description of the relationship"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Related issues, regressions, or similar bugs found during diagnosis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"clarification_needs": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["question", "context", "options"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"question": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The clarification question to ask user"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Background context explaining why this clarification is needed"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"options": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Available options for user to choose from (2-4 options)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Ambiguities requiring user input before fix planning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["timestamp", "bug_description", "source"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of diagnosis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"bug_description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Original bug description that triggered diagnosis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"const": "cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
"description": "Agent that performed diagnosis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnosis_angle": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Diagnosis angle (e.g., 'error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnosis_index": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 4,
|
||||
"description": "Diagnosis index (1-4) in parallel diagnosis set"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"total_diagnoses": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 4,
|
||||
"description": "Total number of parallel diagnoses"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"duration_seconds": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Diagnosis duration in seconds"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,219 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"$id": "discovery-finding-schema",
|
||||
"title": "Discovery Finding Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for perspective-based issue discovery results",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["perspective", "discovery_id", "analysis_timestamp", "cli_tool_used", "summary", "findings"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"perspective": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["bug", "ux", "test", "quality", "security", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
|
||||
"description": "Discovery perspective"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"discovery_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^DSC-\\d{8}-\\d{6}$",
|
||||
"description": "Parent discovery session ID"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"analysis_timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of analysis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cli_tool_used": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["gemini", "qwen", "codex"],
|
||||
"description": "CLI tool that performed the analysis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Specific model version used",
|
||||
"examples": ["gemini-2.5-pro", "qwen-max"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"analysis_duration_ms": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"description": "Analysis duration in milliseconds"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["total_findings"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"total_findings": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"critical": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"high": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"medium": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"low": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"files_analyzed": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Summary statistics (FLAT structure, NOT nested)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"findings": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "perspective", "priority", "category", "description", "file", "line"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^dsc-[a-z]+-\\d{3}-[a-f0-9]{8}$",
|
||||
"description": "Unique finding ID: dsc-{perspective}-{seq}-{uuid8}",
|
||||
"examples": ["dsc-bug-001-a1b2c3d4"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"minLength": 10,
|
||||
"maxLength": 200,
|
||||
"description": "Concise finding title"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"perspective": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["bug", "ux", "test", "quality", "security", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"priority": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"],
|
||||
"description": "Priority level (lowercase only)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"category": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Perspective-specific category",
|
||||
"examples": ["null-check", "edge-case", "missing-test", "complexity", "injection"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"minLength": 20,
|
||||
"description": "Detailed description of the finding"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "File path relative to project root"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"line": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Line number of the finding"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"snippet": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Relevant code snippet"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"suggested_issue": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["title", "type", "priority"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Suggested issue title for export"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["bug", "feature", "enhancement", "refactor", "test", "docs"],
|
||||
"description": "Issue type"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"priority": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 5,
|
||||
"description": "Priority 1-5 (1=critical, 5=low)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tags": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Suggested tags for the issue"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Pre-filled issue suggestion for export"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"external_reference": {
|
||||
"type": ["object", "null"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"source": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"url": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" },
|
||||
"relevance": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "External reference from Exa research (if applicable)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"confidence": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Confidence score 0.0-1.0"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"impact": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Description of potential impact"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommendation": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Specific recommendation to address the finding"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"additionalProperties": true,
|
||||
"description": "Additional metadata (CWE ID, OWASP category, etc.)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Array of discovered findings"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cross_references": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"finding_id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"related_perspectives": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reason": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Cross-references to findings in other perspectives"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"examples": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"perspective": "bug",
|
||||
"discovery_id": "DSC-20250128-143022",
|
||||
"analysis_timestamp": "2025-01-28T14:35:00Z",
|
||||
"cli_tool_used": "gemini",
|
||||
"model": "gemini-2.5-pro",
|
||||
"analysis_duration_ms": 45000,
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"total_findings": 8,
|
||||
"critical": 1,
|
||||
"high": 2,
|
||||
"medium": 3,
|
||||
"low": 2,
|
||||
"files_analyzed": 5
|
||||
},
|
||||
"findings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "dsc-bug-001-a1b2c3d4",
|
||||
"title": "Missing null check in user validation",
|
||||
"perspective": "bug",
|
||||
"priority": "high",
|
||||
"category": "null-check",
|
||||
"description": "User object is accessed without null check after database query, which may fail if user doesn't exist",
|
||||
"file": "src/auth/validator.ts",
|
||||
"line": 45,
|
||||
"snippet": "const user = await db.findUser(id);\nreturn user.email; // user may be null",
|
||||
"suggested_issue": {
|
||||
"title": "Add null check in user validation",
|
||||
"type": "bug",
|
||||
"priority": 2,
|
||||
"tags": ["bug", "auth"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"external_reference": null,
|
||||
"confidence": 0.85,
|
||||
"impact": "Runtime error when user not found",
|
||||
"recommendation": "Add null check: if (!user) throw new NotFoundError('User not found');"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"cross_references": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"$id": "discovery-state-schema",
|
||||
"title": "Discovery State Schema (Merged)",
|
||||
"description": "Unified schema for issue discovery session (state + progress merged)",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["discovery_id", "target_pattern", "phase", "created_at"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"discovery_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Unique discovery session ID",
|
||||
"pattern": "^DSC-\\d{8}-\\d{6}$",
|
||||
"examples": ["DSC-20250128-143022"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"target_pattern": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "File/directory pattern being analyzed",
|
||||
"examples": ["src/auth/**", "codex-lens/**/*.py"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"phase": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["initialization", "parallel", "aggregation", "complete"],
|
||||
"description": "Current execution phase"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"created_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"updated_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"target": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Target module information",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"files_count": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"source": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"tests": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"total": { "type": "integer" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"project": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"version": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"perspectives": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Perspective analysis status (merged from progress)",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["name", "status"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["bug", "ux", "test", "quality", "security", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["pending", "in_progress", "completed", "failed"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"findings": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"external_research": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"enabled": { "type": "boolean", "default": false },
|
||||
"completed": { "type": "boolean", "default": false }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"results": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Aggregated results (final phase)",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"total_findings": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"issues_generated": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
|
||||
"priority_distribution": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"critical": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"high": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"medium": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"low": { "type": "integer" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"examples": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"discovery_id": "DSC-20251228-182237",
|
||||
"target_pattern": "codex-lens/**/*.py",
|
||||
"phase": "complete",
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-12-28T18:22:37+08:00",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2025-12-28T18:35:00+08:00",
|
||||
"target": {
|
||||
"files_count": { "source": 48, "tests": 44, "total": 93 },
|
||||
"project": { "name": "codex-lens", "version": "0.1.0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"perspectives": [
|
||||
{ "name": "bug", "status": "completed", "findings": 15 },
|
||||
{ "name": "test", "status": "completed", "findings": 11 },
|
||||
{ "name": "quality", "status": "completed", "findings": 12 }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"external_research": { "enabled": false, "completed": false },
|
||||
"results": {
|
||||
"total_findings": 37,
|
||||
"issues_generated": 15,
|
||||
"priority_distribution": { "critical": 4, "high": 13, "medium": 16, "low": 6 }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,124 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Exploration Context Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Code exploration results from cli-explore-agent for task context gathering",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"project_structure",
|
||||
"relevant_files",
|
||||
"patterns",
|
||||
"dependencies",
|
||||
"integration_points",
|
||||
"constraints",
|
||||
"clarification_needs",
|
||||
"_metadata"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"project_structure": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Overall architecture description: module organization, layer structure, component relationships"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"relevant_files": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"oneOf": [
|
||||
{"type": "string"},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["path", "relevance"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"path": {"type": "string", "description": "File path relative to project root"},
|
||||
"relevance": {"type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1, "description": "Relevance score 0.0-1.0 (0.7+ high, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low)"},
|
||||
"rationale": {"type": "string", "description": "Brief explanation of why this file is relevant from this exploration angle"}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "File paths to be modified or referenced for the task. Prefer object format with relevance scores for synthesis prioritization."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"patterns": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Existing code patterns, conventions, and styles found in the codebase"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependencies": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "External and internal module dependencies relevant to the task"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"integration_points": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Where this task connects with existing code: APIs, hooks, events, shared state"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"constraints": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Technical constraints and limitations affecting implementation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"clarification_needs": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["question", "context", "options"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"question": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The clarification question to ask user"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Background context explaining why this clarification is needed"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"options": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Available options for user to choose from (2-4 options)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommended": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"description": "Zero-based index of recommended option in the options array. Based on codebase patterns and best practices analysis."
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Ambiguities requiring user input before planning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["timestamp", "task_description", "source"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of exploration"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"task_description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Original task description that triggered exploration"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"const": "cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
"description": "Agent that performed exploration"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exploration_angle": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Agent-chosen exploration angle (e.g., 'architecture', 'security', 'dataflow')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exploration_index": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 4,
|
||||
"description": "Exploration index (1-4) in parallel exploration set"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"total_explorations": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 4,
|
||||
"description": "Total number of parallel explorations"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"duration_seconds": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Exploration duration in seconds"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,298 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Fix Plan Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Bug fix plan from cli-lite-planning-agent or direct planning",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"summary",
|
||||
"root_cause",
|
||||
"strategy",
|
||||
"tasks",
|
||||
"estimated_time",
|
||||
"recommended_execution",
|
||||
"severity",
|
||||
"risk_level",
|
||||
"_metadata"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "2-3 sentence overview of the fix plan"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"root_cause": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Consolidated root cause statement from all diagnoses"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["immediate_patch", "comprehensive_fix", "refactor"],
|
||||
"description": "Fix strategy: immediate_patch (minimal change), comprehensive_fix (proper solution), refactor (structural improvement)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"maxItems": 5,
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "scope", "action", "description", "implementation", "verification"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^FIX[0-9]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Task identifier (FIX1, FIX2, FIX3...)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Task title (action verb + target, e.g., 'Fix token validation edge case')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Task scope: module path (src/auth/), feature name, or single file. Prefer module level."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Primary file (deprecated, use scope + modification_points instead)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"action": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Fix", "Update", "Refactor", "Add", "Delete", "Configure"],
|
||||
"description": "Primary action type"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "What to fix (1-2 sentences)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"modification_points": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["file", "target", "change"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "File path within scope"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"target": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Function/class/line range (e.g., 'validateToken:45-60')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"change": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Brief description of change"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "All modification points for this fix task. Group related changes into one task."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"implementation": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"minItems": 2,
|
||||
"maxItems": 5,
|
||||
"description": "Step-by-step fix implementation guide"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"verification": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"maxItems": 3,
|
||||
"description": "Verification/test criteria to confirm fix works"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reference": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"pattern": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Pattern name to follow"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"files": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Reference file paths to study"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"examples": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Specific guidance or example references"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Reference materials for fix implementation (optional)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"depends_on": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^FIX[0-9]+$"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs this task depends on (e.g., ['FIX1'])"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"risk": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high"],
|
||||
"description": "Risk level of this specific fix task"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Fixed CLI execution ID for this fix task (e.g., 'session-FIX1', 'bugfix-001-diagnosis')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cli_execution": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["new", "resume", "fork", "merge_fork"],
|
||||
"description": "CLI execution strategy: new (no deps), resume (1 dep, continue), fork (1 dep, branch), merge_fork (N deps, combine)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resume_from": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Parent task's cli_execution_id (for resume/fork strategies)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"merge_from": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Multiple parents' cli_execution_ids (for merge_fork strategy)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "CLI execution strategy based on task dependencies"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Structured fix task breakdown (1-5 tasks)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"execution_order": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"phase": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Phase name (e.g., 'parallel-1', 'sequential-1')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs in this phase"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["parallel", "sequential"],
|
||||
"description": "Execution type"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Ordered execution phases"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exit_conditions": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"success": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Condition for successful fix completion"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"failure": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Condition that indicates fix failure"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Conditions for fix workflow termination"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Execution flow control (optional, auto-inferred from depends_on if not provided)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"focus_paths": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Key file paths affected by this fix (aggregated from tasks)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"test_strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["unit", "integration", "e2e", "smoke", "full"],
|
||||
"description": "Test scope to run after fix"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"specific_tests": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Specific test files or patterns to run"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"manual_verification": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Manual verification steps if automated tests not available"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Testing strategy for fix verification"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"rollback_plan": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["git_revert", "feature_flag", "manual"],
|
||||
"description": "Rollback strategy if fix fails"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"steps": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Rollback steps"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Rollback plan if fix causes issues (optional, recommended for high severity)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"estimated_time": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Total estimated fix time (e.g., '30 minutes', '2 hours')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommended_execution": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Agent", "Codex"],
|
||||
"description": "Recommended execution method based on complexity"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"severity": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Low", "Medium", "High", "Critical"],
|
||||
"description": "Bug severity level"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"risk_level": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["low", "medium", "high"],
|
||||
"description": "Risk level of implementing the fix"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["timestamp", "source"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of planning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["cli-lite-planning-agent", "direct-planning"],
|
||||
"description": "Planning source"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planning_mode": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["direct", "agent-based"],
|
||||
"description": "Planning execution mode"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagnosis_angles": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Diagnosis angles used for context"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"duration_seconds": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Planning duration in seconds"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,170 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Issues JSONL Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for each line in issues.jsonl (flat storage)",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "status", "created_at"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Issue ID (GH-123, ISS-xxx, DSC-001)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["registered", "planning", "planned", "queued", "executing", "completed", "failed", "paused"],
|
||||
"default": "registered"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"priority": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 5,
|
||||
"default": 3,
|
||||
"description": "1=critical, 2=high, 3=medium, 4=low, 5=trivial"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Issue context/description (markdown)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["github", "text", "discovery"],
|
||||
"description": "Source of the issue"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source_url": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Original source URL (for GitHub issues)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tags": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Issue tags"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"extended_context": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Minimal extended context for planning hints",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"location": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "file:line format (e.g., 'src/auth.ts:42')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"suggested_fix": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Suggested remediation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"notes": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Additional notes (user clarifications or discovery hints)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"affected_components": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Files/modules affected"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"feedback": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Execution feedback history (failures, clarifications, rejections) for planning phase reference",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["type", "stage", "content", "created_at"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["failure", "clarification", "rejection"],
|
||||
"description": "Type of feedback"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"stage": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["new", "plan", "execute"],
|
||||
"description": "Which stage the feedback occurred (new=creation, plan=planning, execute=execution)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "JSON string for failures (with solution_id, task_id, error_type, message, stack_trace) or plain text for clarifications/rejections"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"created_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "Timestamp when feedback was created"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lifecycle_requirements": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"test_strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["unit", "integration", "e2e", "manual", "auto"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"regression_scope": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["affected", "related", "full"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"acceptance_type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["automated", "manual", "both"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"commit_strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["per-task", "squash", "atomic"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"bound_solution_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "ID of the bound solution (null if none bound)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solution_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"default": 0,
|
||||
"description": "Number of candidate solutions"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"created_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"updated_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planned_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"completed_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"examples": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "DSC-001",
|
||||
"title": "Fix: SQLite connection pool memory leak",
|
||||
"status": "registered",
|
||||
"priority": 1,
|
||||
"context": "Connection pool cleanup only happens when MAX_POOL_SIZE is reached...",
|
||||
"source": "discovery",
|
||||
"tags": ["bug", "resource-leak", "critical"],
|
||||
"extended_context": {
|
||||
"location": "storage/sqlite_store.py:59",
|
||||
"suggested_fix": "Implement periodic cleanup or weak references",
|
||||
"notes": null
|
||||
},
|
||||
"affected_components": ["storage/sqlite_store.py"],
|
||||
"lifecycle_requirements": {
|
||||
"test_strategy": "unit",
|
||||
"regression_scope": "affected",
|
||||
"acceptance_type": "automated",
|
||||
"commit_strategy": "per-task"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"bound_solution_id": null,
|
||||
"solution_count": 0,
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-12-28T18:22:37Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,421 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Multi-CLI Discussion Artifact Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Visualization-friendly output for multi-CLI collaborative discussion agent",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["metadata", "discussionTopic", "relatedFiles", "planning", "decision", "decisionRecords"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["artifactId", "roundId", "timestamp", "contributingAgents"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"artifactId": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Unique ID for this artifact (e.g., 'MCP-auth-refactor-2026-01-13-round-1')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"roundId": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Discussion round number"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"contributingAgents": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/AgentIdentifier"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Agents that contributed to this artifact"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"durationSeconds": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Total duration in seconds"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exportFormats": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["markdown", "html"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Supported export formats"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"discussionTopic": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["title", "description", "status"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"included": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"description": "What's in scope"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"excluded": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"description": "What's explicitly out of scope"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"keyQuestions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"description": "Questions being explored"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["exploring", "analyzing", "debating", "decided", "blocked"],
|
||||
"description": "Discussion status"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tags": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Tags for filtering (e.g., ['auth', 'security', 'api'])"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"relatedFiles": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"fileTree": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/FileNode" },
|
||||
"description": "File tree structure"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependencyGraph": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/DependencyEdge" },
|
||||
"description": "Dependency relationships"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"impactSummary": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/FileImpact" },
|
||||
"description": "File impact summary"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planning": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"functional": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/Requirement" },
|
||||
"description": "Functional requirements"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"nonFunctional": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/Requirement" },
|
||||
"description": "Non-functional requirements"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"acceptanceCriteria": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/AcceptanceCriterion" },
|
||||
"description": "Acceptance criteria"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"decision": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["status", "confidenceScore"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["pending", "decided", "conflict"],
|
||||
"description": "Decision status"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"selectedSolution": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/Solution"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"rejectedAlternatives": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/RejectedSolution" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"confidenceScore": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Confidence score (0.0 to 1.0)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"decisionRecords": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"timeline": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/DecisionEvent" },
|
||||
"description": "Timeline of decision events"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_internal": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Internal analysis data (for debugging)",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"cli_analyses": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/CLIAnalysis" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cross_verification": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/CrossVerification"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"convergence": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/ConvergenceMetrics"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"definitions": {
|
||||
"I18nLabel": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["en", "zh"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"en": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"zh": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Multi-language label for UI display"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"AgentIdentifier": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["name", "id"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Gemini", "Codex", "Qwen", "Human", "System"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"id": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"FileNode": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["path", "type"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"path": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["file", "directory"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"modificationStatus": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["added", "modified", "deleted", "unchanged"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"impactScore": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"children": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/FileNode" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"codeSnippet": { "$ref": "#/definitions/CodeSnippet" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"DependencyEdge": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["source", "target", "relationship"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"source": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"target": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"relationship": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"FileImpact": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["filePath", "score", "reasoning"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"filePath": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"line": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"score": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reasoning": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"CodeSnippet": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["startLine", "endLine", "code"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"startLine": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"endLine": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"code": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"language": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"comment": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Requirement": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "description", "priority"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"priority": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"AcceptanceCriterion": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "description", "isMet"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"isMet": { "type": "boolean" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Solution": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "description"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"title": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"description": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"pros": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cons": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"estimatedEffort": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"risk": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"affectedFiles": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/FileImpact" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"sourceCLIs": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"RejectedSolution": {
|
||||
"allOf": [
|
||||
{ "$ref": "#/definitions/Solution" },
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["rejectionReason"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"rejectionReason": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"DecisionEvent": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["eventId", "timestamp", "type", "contributor", "summary"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"eventId": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["proposal", "argument", "agreement", "disagreement", "decision", "reversal"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"contributor": { "$ref": "#/definitions/AgentIdentifier" },
|
||||
"summary": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" },
|
||||
"evidence": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/Evidence" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reversibility": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["easily_reversible", "requires_refactoring", "irreversible"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Evidence": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["type", "content", "description"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["link", "code_snippet", "log_output", "benchmark", "reference"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"content": {},
|
||||
"description": { "$ref": "#/definitions/I18nLabel" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"CLIAnalysis": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["tool", "perspective", "feasibility_score"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"tool": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["gemini", "codex", "qwen"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"perspective": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"feasibility_score": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"findings": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"implementation_approaches": { "type": "array" },
|
||||
"technical_concerns": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"code_locations": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "$ref": "#/definitions/FileImpact" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"CrossVerification": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"agreements": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"disagreements": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resolution": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"ConvergenceMetrics": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"score": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"new_insights": { "type": "boolean" },
|
||||
"recommendation": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["continue", "converged", "user_input_needed"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,444 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Plan Object Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Implementation plan from cli-lite-planning-agent or direct planning",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"summary",
|
||||
"approach",
|
||||
"tasks",
|
||||
"estimated_time",
|
||||
"recommended_execution",
|
||||
"complexity",
|
||||
"_metadata"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "2-3 sentence overview of the implementation plan"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"approach": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "High-level implementation strategy and methodology"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"maxItems": 10,
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "scope", "action", "description", "implementation", "acceptance"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^T[0-9]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Task identifier (T1, T2, T3...)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Task title (action verb + target module/feature)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Task scope: module path (src/auth/), feature name, or single file. Prefer module/feature level over single file."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Primary file (deprecated, use scope + modification_points instead)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"action": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Create", "Update", "Implement", "Refactor", "Add", "Delete", "Configure", "Test", "Fix"],
|
||||
"description": "Primary action type"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "What to implement (1-2 sentences)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"modification_points": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["file", "target", "change"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "File path within scope"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"target": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Function/class/line range (e.g., 'validateToken:45-60')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"change": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Brief description of change"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "All modification points for this task. Group related changes (same feature/module) into one task with multiple modification_points."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"implementation": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"minItems": 2,
|
||||
"maxItems": 7,
|
||||
"description": "Step-by-step implementation guide"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reference": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"pattern": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Pattern name to follow"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"files": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Reference file paths to study"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"examples": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Specific guidance or example references"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Reference materials for implementation (optional)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"acceptance": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"maxItems": 4,
|
||||
"description": "Verification criteria (quantified, testable)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"depends_on": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^T[0-9]+$"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs this task depends on (e.g., ['T1', 'T2'])"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Fixed CLI execution ID for this task (e.g., 'session-T1', 'IMPL-001-analysis')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cli_execution": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"strategy": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["new", "resume", "fork", "merge_fork"],
|
||||
"description": "CLI execution strategy: new (no deps), resume (1 dep, continue), fork (1 dep, branch), merge_fork (N deps, combine)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resume_from": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Parent task's cli_execution_id (for resume/fork strategies)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"merge_from": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Multiple parents' cli_execution_ids (for merge_fork strategy)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "CLI execution strategy based on task dependencies"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"rationale": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"chosen_approach": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The selected implementation approach and why it was chosen"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"alternatives_considered": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Alternative approaches that were considered but not chosen"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"decision_factors": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Key factors that influenced the decision (performance, maintainability, cost, etc.)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tradeoffs": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Known tradeoffs of the chosen approach"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Design rationale explaining WHY this approach was chosen (required for Medium/High complexity)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"verification": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"unit_tests": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "List of unit test names/descriptions to create"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"integration_tests": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "List of integration test names/descriptions to create"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"manual_checks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Manual verification steps with specific actions"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"success_metrics": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Quantified metrics for success (e.g., 'Response time <200ms', 'Coverage >80%')"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Detailed verification steps beyond acceptance criteria (required for Medium/High complexity)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"risks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["description", "probability", "impact", "mitigation"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Description of the risk"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"probability": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Low", "Medium", "High"],
|
||||
"description": "Likelihood of the risk occurring"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"impact": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Low", "Medium", "High"],
|
||||
"description": "Impact severity if the risk occurs"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"mitigation": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Strategy to mitigate or prevent the risk"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"fallback": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Alternative approach if mitigation fails"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Risk assessment and mitigation strategies (required for High complexity)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"code_skeleton": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"interfaces": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"definition": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"purpose": {"type": "string"}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Key interface/type definitions"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"key_functions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"signature": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"purpose": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"returns": {"type": "string"}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Critical function signatures"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"classes": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"purpose": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"methods": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Key class structures"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Code skeleton with interface/function signatures (required for High complexity)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Structured task breakdown (1-10 tasks)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"data_flow": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"diagram": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "ASCII/text representation of data flow (e.g., 'A → B → C')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"stages": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["stage", "input", "output", "component"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"stage": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Stage name (e.g., 'Extraction', 'Processing', 'Storage')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Input data format/type"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"output": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Output data format/type"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"component": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Component/module handling this stage"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"transformations": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Data transformations applied in this stage"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Detailed data flow stages"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependencies": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "External dependencies or data sources"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Global data flow design showing how data moves through the system (required for High complexity)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"design_decisions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["decision", "rationale"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"decision": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The design decision made"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"rationale": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Why this decision was made"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tradeoff": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "What was traded off for this decision"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"alternatives": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Alternatives that were considered"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Global design decisions that affect the entire plan"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"execution_order": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"phase": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Phase name (e.g., 'parallel-1', 'sequential-1')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs in this phase"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["parallel", "sequential"],
|
||||
"description": "Execution type"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Ordered execution phases"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exit_conditions": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"success": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Condition for successful completion"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"failure": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Condition that indicates failure"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Conditions for workflow termination"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Execution flow control (optional, auto-inferred from depends_on if not provided)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"focus_paths": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Key file paths affected by this plan (aggregated from tasks)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"estimated_time": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Total estimated implementation time (e.g., '30 minutes', '2 hours')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommended_execution": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Agent", "Codex"],
|
||||
"description": "Recommended execution method based on complexity"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"complexity": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Low", "Medium", "High"],
|
||||
"description": "Task complexity level"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["timestamp", "source"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of planning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["cli-lite-planning-agent", "direct-planning"],
|
||||
"description": "Planning source"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planning_mode": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["direct", "agent-based"],
|
||||
"description": "Planning execution mode"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exploration_angles": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Exploration angles used for context"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"duration_seconds": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Planning duration in seconds"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Plan Verification Agent Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Defines dimensions, severity rules, and CLI templates for plan verification agent",
|
||||
|
||||
"dimensions": {
|
||||
"A": { "name": "User Intent Alignment", "tier": 1, "severity": "CRITICAL",
|
||||
"checks": ["Goal Alignment", "Scope Drift", "Success Criteria Match", "Intent Conflicts"] },
|
||||
"B": { "name": "Requirements Coverage", "tier": 1, "severity": "CRITICAL",
|
||||
"checks": ["Orphaned Requirements", "Unmapped Tasks", "NFR Coverage Gaps"] },
|
||||
"C": { "name": "Consistency Validation", "tier": 1, "severity": "CRITICAL",
|
||||
"checks": ["Requirement Conflicts", "Architecture Drift", "Terminology Drift", "Data Model Inconsistency"] },
|
||||
"D": { "name": "Dependency Integrity", "tier": 2, "severity": "HIGH",
|
||||
"checks": ["Circular Dependencies", "Missing Dependencies", "Broken Dependencies", "Logical Ordering"] },
|
||||
"E": { "name": "Synthesis Alignment", "tier": 2, "severity": "HIGH",
|
||||
"checks": ["Priority Conflicts", "Success Criteria Mismatch", "Risk Mitigation Gaps"] },
|
||||
"F": { "name": "Task Specification Quality", "tier": 3, "severity": "MEDIUM",
|
||||
"checks": ["Ambiguous Focus Paths", "Underspecified Acceptance", "Missing Artifacts", "Weak Flow Control"] },
|
||||
"G": { "name": "Duplication Detection", "tier": 4, "severity": "LOW",
|
||||
"checks": ["Overlapping Task Scope", "Redundant Coverage"] },
|
||||
"H": { "name": "Feasibility Assessment", "tier": 4, "severity": "LOW",
|
||||
"checks": ["Complexity Misalignment", "Resource Conflicts", "Skill Gap Risks"] },
|
||||
"I": { "name": "Constraints Compliance", "tier": 1, "severity": "CRITICAL",
|
||||
"checks": ["Consolidated Constraints Violation", "Phase Constraint Ignored", "User Constraint Override"] },
|
||||
"J": { "name": "N+1 Context Validation", "tier": 2, "severity": "HIGH",
|
||||
"checks": ["Deferred Item Included", "Decision Contradiction", "Revisit Flag Ignored"] }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"tiers": {
|
||||
"1": { "dimensions": ["A", "B", "C", "I"], "priority": "CRITICAL", "limit": null, "rule": "analysis-review-architecture" },
|
||||
"2": { "dimensions": ["D", "E", "J"], "priority": "HIGH", "limit": 15, "rule": "analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause" },
|
||||
"3": { "dimensions": ["F"], "priority": "MEDIUM", "limit": 20, "rule": "analysis-analyze-code-patterns" },
|
||||
"4": { "dimensions": ["G", "H"], "priority": "LOW", "limit": 15, "rule": "analysis-analyze-code-patterns" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"severity_rules": {
|
||||
"CRITICAL": ["User intent violation", "Synthesis authority violation", "Zero coverage", "Circular/broken deps", "Constraint violation"],
|
||||
"HIGH": ["NFR gaps", "Priority conflicts", "Missing risk mitigation", "Deferred item included", "Decision contradiction"],
|
||||
"MEDIUM": ["Terminology drift", "Missing refs", "Weak flow control"],
|
||||
"LOW": ["Style improvements", "Minor redundancy"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"quality_gate": {
|
||||
"BLOCK_EXECUTION": { "condition": "critical > 0", "emoji": "🛑" },
|
||||
"PROCEED_WITH_FIXES": { "condition": "critical == 0 && high > 0", "emoji": "⚠️" },
|
||||
"PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION": { "condition": "critical == 0 && high == 0 && medium > 0", "emoji": "✅" },
|
||||
"PROCEED": { "condition": "only low or none", "emoji": "✅" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"token_budget": { "total_findings": 50, "early_exit": "CRITICAL > 0 in Tier 1 → skip Tier 3-4" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,141 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Project Guidelines Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for project-guidelines.json - user-maintained rules and constraints",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["conventions", "constraints", "_metadata"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"conventions": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Coding conventions and standards",
|
||||
"required": ["coding_style", "naming_patterns", "file_structure", "documentation"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"coding_style": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Coding style rules (e.g., 'Use strict TypeScript mode', 'Prefer const over let')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"naming_patterns": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Naming conventions (e.g., 'Use camelCase for variables', 'Use PascalCase for components')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"file_structure": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "File organization rules (e.g., 'One component per file', 'Tests alongside source files')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"documentation": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Documentation requirements (e.g., 'JSDoc for public APIs', 'README for each module')"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"constraints": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Technical constraints and boundaries",
|
||||
"required": ["architecture", "tech_stack", "performance", "security"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"architecture": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Architecture constraints (e.g., 'No circular dependencies', 'Services must be stateless')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tech_stack": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Technology constraints (e.g., 'No new dependencies without review', 'Use native fetch over axios')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"performance": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Performance requirements (e.g., 'API response < 200ms', 'Bundle size < 500KB')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"security": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Security requirements (e.g., 'Sanitize all user input', 'No secrets in code')"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"quality_rules": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Enforceable quality rules",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["rule", "scope"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"rule": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The quality rule statement"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Where the rule applies (e.g., 'all', 'src/**', 'tests/**')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enforced_by": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "How the rule is enforced (e.g., 'eslint', 'pre-commit', 'code-review')"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"learnings": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Project learnings captured from workflow sessions",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["date", "insight"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"date": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date",
|
||||
"description": "Date the learning was captured (YYYY-MM-DD)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"session_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "WFS session ID where the learning originated"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"insight": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "The learning or insight captured"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Additional context about when/why this learning applies"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"category": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["architecture", "performance", "security", "testing", "workflow", "other"],
|
||||
"description": "Category of the learning"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["created_at", "version"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"created_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of creation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"version": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Schema version (e.g., '1.0.0')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"last_updated": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of last update"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"updated_by": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Who/what last updated the file (e.g., 'user', 'workflow:session:solidify')"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Project Tech Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for project-tech.json - auto-generated technical analysis (stack, architecture, components)",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"project_name",
|
||||
"initialized_at",
|
||||
"overview",
|
||||
"features",
|
||||
"statistics",
|
||||
"_metadata"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"project_name": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Project name extracted from git repo or directory"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"initialized_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of initialization"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"overview": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"description",
|
||||
"technology_stack",
|
||||
"architecture",
|
||||
"key_components"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Brief project description (e.g., 'TypeScript web application with React frontend')"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"technology_stack": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["languages", "frameworks", "build_tools", "test_frameworks"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"languages": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["name", "file_count", "primary"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Language name (e.g., TypeScript, Python)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"file_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of source files in this language"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"primary": {
|
||||
"type": "boolean",
|
||||
"description": "True if this is the primary language"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"frameworks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Detected frameworks (React, Express, Django, etc.)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"build_tools": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Build tools and package managers (npm, cargo, maven, etc.)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"test_frameworks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Testing frameworks (jest, pytest, go test, etc.)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"architecture": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["style", "layers", "patterns"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"style": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Architecture style (MVC, microservices, layered, etc.)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"layers": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Architectural layers (presentation, business-logic, data-access)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"patterns": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Design patterns (Repository, Factory, Singleton, etc.)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"key_components": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["name", "path", "description", "importance"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"name": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Component name"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"path": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Relative path to component directory"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Brief description of component functionality"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"importance": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["high", "medium", "low"],
|
||||
"description": "Component importance level"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "5-10 core modules/components"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"features": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["session_id", "title", "completed_at", "tags"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"session_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "WFS session identifier"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Feature title/description"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"completed_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of completion"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tags": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||||
"description": "Feature tags for categorization"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": "Completed workflow features (populated by /workflow:session:complete)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"development_index": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Categorized development history (lite-plan/lite-execute)",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"feature": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/devIndexEntry" } },
|
||||
"enhancement": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/devIndexEntry" } },
|
||||
"bugfix": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/devIndexEntry" } },
|
||||
"refactor": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/devIndexEntry" } },
|
||||
"docs": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/devIndexEntry" } }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"statistics": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["total_features", "total_sessions", "last_updated"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"total_features": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Count of completed features"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"total_sessions": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Count of workflow sessions"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"last_updated": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of last update"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["initialized_by", "analysis_timestamp", "analysis_mode"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"initialized_by": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Agent or tool that performed initialization"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"analysis_timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp of analysis"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"analysis_mode": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["deep-scan", "quick-scan", "bash-fallback"],
|
||||
"description": "Analysis mode used"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"$defs": {
|
||||
"devIndexEntry": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["title", "sub_feature", "date", "description", "status"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"title": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 60 },
|
||||
"sub_feature": { "type": "string", "description": "Module/component area" },
|
||||
"date": { "type": "string", "format": "date" },
|
||||
"description": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 100 },
|
||||
"status": { "type": "string", "enum": ["completed", "partial"] },
|
||||
"session_id": { "type": "string", "description": "lite-plan session ID" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,248 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Issue Execution Queue Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Execution queue supporting both task-level (T-N) and solution-level (S-N) granularity",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^QUE-[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}$",
|
||||
"description": "Queue ID in format QUE-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["active", "paused", "completed", "archived"],
|
||||
"default": "active"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"issue_ids": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Issues included in this queue"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solutions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Solution-level queue items (preferred for new queues)",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/solutionItem"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Task-level queue items (legacy format)",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/taskItem"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"conflicts": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Detected conflicts between items",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/conflict"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"execution_groups": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Parallel/Sequential execution groups",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/definitions/executionGroup"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"version": { "type": "string", "default": "2.0" },
|
||||
"queue_type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["solution", "task"],
|
||||
"description": "Queue granularity level"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"total_solutions": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"total_tasks": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"pending_count": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"ready_count": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"executing_count": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"completed_count": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"failed_count": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"last_queue_formation": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"last_updated": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"definitions": {
|
||||
"solutionItem": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["item_id", "issue_id", "solution_id", "status", "task_count", "files_touched"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"item_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^S-[0-9]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Solution-level queue item ID (S-1, S-2, ...)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"issue_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Source issue ID"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solution_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Bound solution ID"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["pending", "ready", "executing", "completed", "failed", "blocked"],
|
||||
"default": "pending"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"task_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Number of tasks in this solution"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"files_touched": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "All files modified by this solution"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"execution_order": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Order in execution sequence"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"execution_group": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Parallel (P*) or Sequential (S*) group ID"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"depends_on": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Solution IDs this item depends on"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"semantic_priority": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Semantic importance score (0.0-1.0)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"queued_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"started_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"completed_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"result": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"summary": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"files_modified": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"tasks_completed": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"commit_hashes": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"failure_reason": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"taskItem": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["item_id", "issue_id", "solution_id", "task_id", "status"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"item_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^T-[0-9]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Task-level queue item ID (T-1, T-2, ...)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"issue_id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"solution_id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"task_id": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["pending", "ready", "executing", "completed", "failed", "blocked"],
|
||||
"default": "pending"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"execution_order": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"execution_group": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"depends_on": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"semantic_priority": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1 },
|
||||
"queued_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"started_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"completed_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
|
||||
"result": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"files_modified": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"files_created": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"summary": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"commit_hash": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"failure_reason": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"conflict": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["file_conflict", "dependency_conflict", "resource_conflict"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"file": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Conflicting file path"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solutions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Solution IDs involved (for solution-level queues)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs involved (for task-level queues)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resolution": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["sequential", "merge", "manual"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resolution_order": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Execution order to resolve conflict"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"rationale": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Explanation of resolution decision"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"resolved": {
|
||||
"type": "boolean",
|
||||
"default": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"executionGroup": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "type"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^[PS][0-9]+$",
|
||||
"description": "Group ID (P1, P2 for parallel, S1, S2 for sequential)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["parallel", "sequential"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solutions": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Solution IDs in this group"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs in this group (legacy)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solution_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of solutions in group"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"task_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of tasks in group (legacy)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Issue Registry Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Global registry of all issues and their solutions",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"issues": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "List of registered issues",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "status", "created_at"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Issue ID (e.g., GH-123, TEXT-xxx)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["registered", "planning", "planned", "queued", "executing", "completed", "failed", "paused"],
|
||||
"default": "registered"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"priority": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 5,
|
||||
"default": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"solution_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"default": 0,
|
||||
"description": "Number of candidate solutions"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"bound_solution_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "ID of the bound solution (null if none bound)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["github", "text", "file"],
|
||||
"description": "Source of the issue"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"source_url": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Original source URL (for GitHub issues)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"created_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"updated_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planned_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"queued_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"completed_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"version": { "type": "string", "default": "1.0" },
|
||||
"total_issues": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"by_status": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"registered": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"planning": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"planned": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"queued": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"executing": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"completed": { "type": "integer" },
|
||||
"failed": { "type": "integer" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"last_updated": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"finding_id": "sec-001-a1b2c3d4",
|
||||
"original_dimension": "security",
|
||||
"iteration": 1,
|
||||
"analysis_timestamp": "2025-01-25T14:40:15Z",
|
||||
"cli_tool_used": "gemini",
|
||||
"root_cause": {
|
||||
"summary": "Legacy code from v1 migration, pre-ORM implementation",
|
||||
"details": "Query builder was ported from old codebase without security review. Team unaware of injection risks in string concatenation pattern. Code review at migration time focused on functionality, not security.",
|
||||
"affected_scope": "All query-builder.ts methods using string template literals (15 methods total)",
|
||||
"similar_patterns": [
|
||||
"src/database/user-queries.ts:buildEmailQuery",
|
||||
"src/database/order-queries.ts:buildOrderSearch"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"remediation_plan": {
|
||||
"approach": "Migrate to ORM prepared statements with input validation layer",
|
||||
"priority": "P0 - Critical (security vulnerability)",
|
||||
"estimated_effort": "4 hours development + 2 hours testing",
|
||||
"risk_level": "low",
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 1,
|
||||
"action": "Replace direct string concatenation with ORM query builder",
|
||||
"files": ["src/database/query-builder.ts:buildUserQuery:140-150"],
|
||||
"commands": [
|
||||
"Replace: const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;",
|
||||
"With: return db('users').where('id', userId).first();"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rationale": "ORM automatically parameterizes queries, eliminating injection risk",
|
||||
"validation": "Run: npm test -- src/database/query-builder.test.ts"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 2,
|
||||
"action": "Add input validation layer before ORM",
|
||||
"files": ["src/database/validators.ts:validateUserId:NEW"],
|
||||
"commands": [
|
||||
"Create validator: export function validateUserId(id: unknown): number { ... }",
|
||||
"Add schema: z.number().positive().int()"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rationale": "Defense in depth - validate types and ranges before database layer",
|
||||
"validation": "Run: npm test -- src/database/validators.test.ts"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 3,
|
||||
"action": "Apply pattern to all 15 similar methods",
|
||||
"files": ["src/database/query-builder.ts:ALL_METHODS"],
|
||||
"commands": ["Bulk replace string templates with ORM syntax"],
|
||||
"rationale": "Prevent similar vulnerabilities in other query methods",
|
||||
"validation": "Run: npm test -- src/database/"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rollback_strategy": "Git commit before each step, revert if tests fail. Staged rollout: dev → staging → production with monitoring."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"impact_assessment": {
|
||||
"files_affected": [
|
||||
"src/database/query-builder.ts (modify)",
|
||||
"src/database/validators.ts (new)",
|
||||
"src/database/user-queries.ts (modify)",
|
||||
"src/database/order-queries.ts (modify)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"tests_required": [
|
||||
"src/database/query-builder.test.ts (update existing)",
|
||||
"src/database/validators.test.ts (new)",
|
||||
"integration/security/sql-injection.test.ts (new)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"breaking_changes": false,
|
||||
"dependencies_updated": ["knex@2.5.1 (ORM library)"],
|
||||
"deployment_notes": "No downtime required. Database migrations not needed."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reassessed_severity": "high",
|
||||
"severity_change_reason": "Found existing WAF rules partially mitigate risk in production. Input validation at API gateway layer provides additional defense. Downgrade from critical to high, but still requires immediate fix.",
|
||||
"confidence_score": 0.95,
|
||||
"references": [
|
||||
"Project ORM migration guide: docs/architecture/orm-guide.md",
|
||||
"Knex.js parameterization: https://knexjs.org/guide/query-builder.html#where",
|
||||
"Similar incident: TICKET-1234 (previous SQL injection fix)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"status": "remediation_plan_ready"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"dimension": "security",
|
||||
"review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
|
||||
"analysis_timestamp": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
|
||||
"cli_tool_used": "gemini",
|
||||
"model": "gemini-2.5-pro",
|
||||
"analysis_duration_ms": 2145000,
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"total_findings": 15,
|
||||
"critical": 2,
|
||||
"high": 4,
|
||||
"medium": 6,
|
||||
"low": 3,
|
||||
"files_analyzed": 47,
|
||||
"lines_reviewed": 8932
|
||||
},
|
||||
"findings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "sec-001-a1b2c3d4",
|
||||
"title": "SQL Injection vulnerability in user query",
|
||||
"severity": "critical",
|
||||
"category": "injection",
|
||||
"description": "Direct string concatenation in SQL query allows injection attacks. User input is not sanitized before query execution.",
|
||||
"file": "src/database/query-builder.ts",
|
||||
"line": 145,
|
||||
"snippet": "const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;",
|
||||
"recommendation": "Use parameterized queries: db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?', [userId])",
|
||||
"references": [
|
||||
"OWASP Top 10 - A03:2021 Injection",
|
||||
"https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"impact": "Potential data breach, unauthorized access to user records, data manipulation",
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"cwe_id": "CWE-89",
|
||||
"owasp_category": "A03:2021-Injection"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"iteration": 0,
|
||||
"status": "pending_remediation",
|
||||
"cross_references": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"cross_references": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"finding_id": "sec-001-a1b2c3d4",
|
||||
"related_dimensions": ["quality", "architecture"],
|
||||
"reason": "Same file flagged in multiple dimensions"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -1,166 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Issue Solution Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for solution registered to an issue",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "tasks", "is_bound", "created_at"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Unique solution identifier: SOL-{issue-id}-{4-char-uid} where uid is 4 alphanumeric chars",
|
||||
"pattern": "^SOL-.+-[a-z0-9]{4}$",
|
||||
"examples": ["SOL-GH-123-a7x9", "SOL-ISS-20251229-001-b2k4"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "High-level summary of the solution"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"approach": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Technical approach or strategy"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Task breakdown for this solution",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": ["id", "title", "scope", "action", "implementation", "acceptance"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"pattern": "^T[0-9]+$"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"title": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Action verb + target"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Module path or feature area"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"action": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Create", "Update", "Implement", "Refactor", "Add", "Delete", "Configure", "Test", "Fix"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"description": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "1-2 sentences describing what to implement"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"modification_points": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"file": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"target": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"change": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"implementation": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Step-by-step implementation guide"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"test": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Test requirements",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"unit": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"integration": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"commands": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"coverage_target": { "type": "number" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"regression": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"description": "Regression check points"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"acceptance": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Acceptance criteria & verification",
|
||||
"required": ["criteria", "verification"],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"criteria": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"verification": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
|
||||
"manual_checks": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"commit": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Commit specification",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"type": { "type": "string", "enum": ["feat", "fix", "refactor", "test", "docs", "chore"] },
|
||||
"scope": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"message_template": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"breaking": { "type": "boolean" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"depends_on": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"default": [],
|
||||
"description": "Task IDs this task depends on"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"estimated_minutes": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Estimated time to complete"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"status": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Task status (optional, for tracking)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"priority": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"maximum": 5,
|
||||
"default": 3
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exploration_context": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "ACE exploration results",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"project_structure": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"relevant_files": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"items": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"patterns": { "type": "string" },
|
||||
"integration_points": { "type": "string" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"analysis": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Solution risk assessment",
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"risk": { "type": "string", "enum": ["low", "medium", "high"] },
|
||||
"impact": { "type": "string", "enum": ["low", "medium", "high"] },
|
||||
"complexity": { "type": "string", "enum": ["low", "medium", "high"] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"score": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Solution quality score (0.0-1.0)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"is_bound": {
|
||||
"type": "boolean",
|
||||
"default": false,
|
||||
"description": "Whether this solution is bound to the issue"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"created_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"bound_at": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"format": "date-time",
|
||||
"description": "When this solution was bound to the issue"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,158 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
|
||||
"title": "Plan Verification Findings Schema",
|
||||
"description": "Schema for plan verification findings output from cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"session_id",
|
||||
"timestamp",
|
||||
"verification_tiers_completed",
|
||||
"findings",
|
||||
"summary"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"session_id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Workflow session ID (e.g., WFS-20250127-143000)",
|
||||
"pattern": "^WFS-[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}$"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"timestamp": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "ISO 8601 timestamp when verification was completed",
|
||||
"format": "date-time"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"verification_tiers_completed": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "List of verification tiers completed (e.g., ['Tier 1', 'Tier 2'])",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["Tier 1", "Tier 2", "Tier 3", "Tier 4"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"minItems": 1,
|
||||
"maxItems": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"findings": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Array of all findings across all dimensions",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"id",
|
||||
"dimension",
|
||||
"dimension_name",
|
||||
"severity",
|
||||
"location",
|
||||
"summary",
|
||||
"recommendation"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"id": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Unique finding ID prefixed by severity (C1, H1, M1, L1)",
|
||||
"pattern": "^[CHML][0-9]+$"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dimension": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Verification dimension identifier",
|
||||
"enum": ["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dimension_name": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Human-readable dimension name",
|
||||
"enum": [
|
||||
"User Intent Alignment",
|
||||
"Requirements Coverage Analysis",
|
||||
"Consistency Validation",
|
||||
"Dependency Integrity",
|
||||
"Synthesis Alignment",
|
||||
"Task Specification Quality",
|
||||
"Duplication Detection",
|
||||
"Feasibility Assessment"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"severity": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Severity level of the finding",
|
||||
"enum": ["CRITICAL", "HIGH", "MEDIUM", "LOW"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"location": {
|
||||
"type": "array",
|
||||
"description": "Array of locations where issue was found (e.g., 'IMPL_PLAN.md:L45', 'task:IMPL-1.2', 'synthesis:FR-03')",
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"type": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"minItems": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Concise summary of the issue (1-2 sentences)",
|
||||
"minLength": 10,
|
||||
"maxLength": 500
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommendation": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Actionable recommendation to resolve the issue",
|
||||
"minLength": 10,
|
||||
"maxLength": 500
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"type": "object",
|
||||
"description": "Aggregate summary of verification results",
|
||||
"required": [
|
||||
"critical_count",
|
||||
"high_count",
|
||||
"medium_count",
|
||||
"low_count",
|
||||
"total_findings",
|
||||
"coverage_percentage",
|
||||
"recommendation"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"properties": {
|
||||
"critical_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of critical severity findings",
|
||||
"minimum": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"high_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of high severity findings",
|
||||
"minimum": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"medium_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of medium severity findings",
|
||||
"minimum": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"low_count": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Number of low severity findings",
|
||||
"minimum": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"total_findings": {
|
||||
"type": "integer",
|
||||
"description": "Total number of findings",
|
||||
"minimum": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"coverage_percentage": {
|
||||
"type": "number",
|
||||
"description": "Percentage of synthesis requirements covered by tasks (0-100)",
|
||||
"minimum": 0,
|
||||
"maximum": 100
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommendation": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"description": "Quality gate recommendation",
|
||||
"enum": [
|
||||
"BLOCK_EXECUTION",
|
||||
"PROCEED_WITH_FIXES",
|
||||
"PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION",
|
||||
"PROCEED"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,247 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
|
||||
|
||||
"duration": {
|
||||
"$type": "duration",
|
||||
"instant": { "$value": "0ms" },
|
||||
"fast": { "$value": "150ms" },
|
||||
"normal": { "$value": "300ms" },
|
||||
"slow": { "$value": "500ms" },
|
||||
"slower": { "$value": "1000ms" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"easing": {
|
||||
"$type": "cubicBezier",
|
||||
"linear": { "$value": "linear" },
|
||||
"ease-in": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 1, 1)" },
|
||||
"ease-out": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0, 0, 0.2, 1)" },
|
||||
"ease-in-out": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1)" },
|
||||
"spring": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.55, 0.265, 1.55)" },
|
||||
"bounce": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.6, 0.32, 1.6)" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"keyframes": {
|
||||
"_comment_pattern": "Define pairs (in/out, open/close, enter/exit)",
|
||||
"_comment_required": "Required keyframes for components",
|
||||
|
||||
"fade-in": {
|
||||
"0%": { "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"fade-out": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse of fade-in",
|
||||
"0%": { "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"slide-up": {
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "translateY(10px)", "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"slide-down": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse direction",
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "translateY(10px)", "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"scale-in": {
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "scale(0.95)", "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "scale(1)", "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"scale-out": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse of scale-in",
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "scale(1)", "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "scale(0.95)", "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"accordion-down": {
|
||||
"0%": { "height": "0", "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "height": "var(--radix-accordion-content-height)", "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accordion-up": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse",
|
||||
"0%": { "height": "var(--radix-accordion-content-height)", "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "height": "0", "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"dialog-open": {
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -48%) scale(0.96)", "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -50%) scale(1)", "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dialog-close": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse",
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -50%) scale(1)", "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -48%) scale(0.96)", "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"dropdown-open": {
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "scale(0.95) translateY(-4px)", "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "scale(1) translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dropdown-close": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse",
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "scale(1) translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "scale(0.95) translateY(-4px)", "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"toast-enter": {
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "translateX(100%)", "opacity": "0" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "translateX(0)", "opacity": "1" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"toast-exit": {
|
||||
"_comment": "reverse",
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "translateX(0)", "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "translateX(100%)", "opacity": "0" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"spin": {
|
||||
"0%": { "transform": "rotate(0deg)" },
|
||||
"100%": { "transform": "rotate(360deg)" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"pulse": {
|
||||
"0%, 100%": { "opacity": "1" },
|
||||
"50%": { "opacity": "0.5" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"interactions": {
|
||||
"_comment_pattern": "Define for each interactive component state",
|
||||
"_structure": {
|
||||
"property": "string - CSS properties (comma-separated)",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.*}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.*}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"button-hover": {
|
||||
"property": "background-color, transform",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.fast}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-out}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"button-active": {
|
||||
"property": "transform",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.instant}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-in}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"card-hover": {
|
||||
"property": "box-shadow, transform",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.normal}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"input-focus": {
|
||||
"property": "border-color, box-shadow",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.fast}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-out}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dropdown-toggle": {
|
||||
"property": "opacity, transform",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.fast}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-out}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accordion-toggle": {
|
||||
"property": "height, opacity",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.normal}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dialog-toggle": {
|
||||
"property": "opacity, transform",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.normal}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.spring}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tabs-switch": {
|
||||
"property": "color, border-color",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.fast}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"transitions": {
|
||||
"default": { "$value": "all {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in-out}" },
|
||||
"colors": { "$value": "color {duration.fast} {easing.linear}, background-color {duration.fast} {easing.linear}" },
|
||||
"transform": { "$value": "transform {duration.normal} {easing.spring}" },
|
||||
"opacity": { "$value": "opacity {duration.fast} {easing.linear}" },
|
||||
"all-smooth": { "$value": "all {duration.slow} {easing.ease-in-out}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"component_animations": {
|
||||
"_comment_pattern": "Map each component to its animations - MUST match design-tokens.json component list",
|
||||
"_structure": {
|
||||
"stateOrInteraction": {
|
||||
"animation": "keyframe-name {duration.*} {easing.*} OR none",
|
||||
"transition": "{interactions.*} OR none"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"button": {
|
||||
"hover": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.button-hover}" },
|
||||
"active": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.button-active}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"card": {
|
||||
"hover": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.card-hover}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"focus": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.input-focus}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dialog": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "dialog-open {duration.normal} {easing.spring}" },
|
||||
"close": { "animation": "dialog-close {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dropdown": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "dropdown-open {duration.fast} {easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"close": { "animation": "dropdown-close {duration.fast} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"toast": {
|
||||
"enter": { "animation": "toast-enter {duration.normal} {easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"exit": { "animation": "toast-exit {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accordion": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "accordion-down {duration.normal} {easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"close": { "animation": "accordion-up {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"_comment_missing": "Add mappings for: tabs, switch, checkbox, badge, alert"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"accessibility": {
|
||||
"prefers_reduced_motion": {
|
||||
"duration": "0ms",
|
||||
"keyframes": {},
|
||||
"note": "Disable animations when user prefers reduced motion",
|
||||
"css_rule": "@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { *, *::before, *::after { animation-duration: 0.01ms !important; animation-iteration-count: 1 !important; transition-duration: 0.01ms !important; } }"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"version": "string",
|
||||
"created": "ISO timestamp",
|
||||
"source": "code-import|explore|text",
|
||||
"code_snippets": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"animation_name": "string - keyframe/transition name",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_start": "number",
|
||||
"line_end": "number",
|
||||
"snippet": "string - complete @keyframes or transition code",
|
||||
"context_type": "css-keyframes|css-transition|js-animation|scss-animation|etc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_field_rules": {
|
||||
"schema": "$schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification",
|
||||
"duration_wrapper": "All duration values MUST use $value wrapper with ms units",
|
||||
"easing_wrapper": "All easing values MUST use $value wrapper with standard CSS easing or cubic-bezier()",
|
||||
"keyframes": "keyframes MUST define complete component state animations (open/close, enter/exit)",
|
||||
"interactions_refs": "interactions MUST reference duration and easing using {token.path} syntax",
|
||||
"component_mapping": "component_animations MUST map component states to specific keyframes and transitions",
|
||||
"component_coverage": "component_animations MUST be defined for all interactive and stateful components",
|
||||
"transitions_wrapper": "transitions MUST use $value wrapper for complete transition definitions",
|
||||
"accessibility": "accessibility.prefers_reduced_motion MUST be included with CSS media query rule",
|
||||
"code_snippets": "_metadata.code_snippets ONLY present in Code Import mode"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_animation_component_integration": {
|
||||
"requirement": "Each component in design-tokens.json component section MUST have corresponding entry in component_animations",
|
||||
"state_based": "State-based animations (dialog.open, accordion.close) MUST use keyframe animations",
|
||||
"interaction": "Interaction animations (button.hover, input.focus) MUST use transitions",
|
||||
"consistency": "All animation references use {token.path} syntax for consistency"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,342 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
|
||||
"name": "string - Token set name",
|
||||
"description": "string - Token set description",
|
||||
|
||||
"color": {
|
||||
"background": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" }, "$description": "optional" },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"card": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"card-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"border": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"input": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"ring": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
|
||||
"interactive": {
|
||||
"primary": {
|
||||
"default": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"hover": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"active": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"disabled": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"secondary": {
|
||||
"_comment": "Same structure as primary",
|
||||
"default": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"hover": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"active": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"disabled": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accent": {
|
||||
"_comment": "Same structure (no disabled state)",
|
||||
"default": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"hover": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"active": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"destructive": {
|
||||
"_comment": "Same structure (no active/disabled states)",
|
||||
"default": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"hover": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"muted": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"muted-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
|
||||
"chart": {
|
||||
"1": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"2": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"3": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"4": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"5": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"sidebar": {
|
||||
"background": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"primary": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"primary-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"accent": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"accent-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"border": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"ring": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"typography": {
|
||||
"font_families": {
|
||||
"sans": "string - 'Font Name', fallback1, fallback2",
|
||||
"serif": "string",
|
||||
"mono": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"font_sizes": {
|
||||
"xs": "0.75rem",
|
||||
"sm": "0.875rem",
|
||||
"base": "1rem",
|
||||
"lg": "1.125rem",
|
||||
"xl": "1.25rem",
|
||||
"2xl": "1.5rem",
|
||||
"3xl": "1.875rem",
|
||||
"4xl": "2.25rem"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"line_heights": {
|
||||
"tight": "number",
|
||||
"normal": "number",
|
||||
"relaxed": "number"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"letter_spacing": {
|
||||
"tight": "string",
|
||||
"normal": "string",
|
||||
"wide": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"combinations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "h1|h2|h3|h4|h5|h6|body|caption",
|
||||
"font_family": "sans|serif|mono",
|
||||
"font_size": "string - reference to font_sizes",
|
||||
"font_weight": "number - 400|500|600|700",
|
||||
"line_height": "string",
|
||||
"letter_spacing": "string"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"spacing": {
|
||||
"0": "0",
|
||||
"1": "0.25rem",
|
||||
"2": "0.5rem",
|
||||
"3": "0.75rem",
|
||||
"4": "1rem",
|
||||
"6": "1.5rem",
|
||||
"8": "2rem",
|
||||
"12": "3rem",
|
||||
"16": "4rem",
|
||||
"20": "5rem",
|
||||
"24": "6rem",
|
||||
"32": "8rem",
|
||||
"40": "10rem",
|
||||
"48": "12rem",
|
||||
"56": "14rem",
|
||||
"64": "16rem"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"opacity": {
|
||||
"disabled": "0.5",
|
||||
"hover": "0.8",
|
||||
"active": "1"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"shadows": {
|
||||
"2xs": "string - CSS shadow value",
|
||||
"xs": "string",
|
||||
"sm": "string",
|
||||
"DEFAULT": "string",
|
||||
"md": "string",
|
||||
"lg": "string",
|
||||
"xl": "string",
|
||||
"2xl": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"border_radius": {
|
||||
"sm": "string - calc() or fixed",
|
||||
"md": "string",
|
||||
"lg": "string",
|
||||
"xl": "string",
|
||||
"DEFAULT": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"breakpoints": {
|
||||
"sm": "640px",
|
||||
"md": "768px",
|
||||
"lg": "1024px",
|
||||
"xl": "1280px",
|
||||
"2xl": "1536px"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"component": {
|
||||
"_comment_pattern": "COMPONENT PATTERN - Apply to: button, card, input, dialog, dropdown, toast, accordion, tabs, switch, checkbox, badge, alert",
|
||||
"_example_button": {
|
||||
"$type": "component",
|
||||
"base": {
|
||||
"_comment": "Layout properties using camelCase",
|
||||
"display": "inline-flex|flex|block",
|
||||
"alignItems": "center",
|
||||
"borderRadius": "{border_radius.md}",
|
||||
"transition": "{transitions.default}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"size": {
|
||||
"small": { "height": "32px", "padding": "{spacing.2} {spacing.3}", "fontSize": "{typography.font_sizes.xs}" },
|
||||
"default": { "height": "40px", "padding": "{spacing.2} {spacing.4}" },
|
||||
"large": { "height": "48px", "padding": "{spacing.3} {spacing.6}", "fontSize": "{typography.font_sizes.base}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"variant": {
|
||||
"variantName": {
|
||||
"default": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.default}", "color": "{color.interactive.primary.foreground}" },
|
||||
"hover": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.hover}" },
|
||||
"active": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.active}" },
|
||||
"disabled": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.disabled}", "opacity": "{opacity.disabled}", "cursor": "not-allowed" },
|
||||
"focus": { "outline": "2px solid {color.ring}", "outlineOffset": "2px" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"state": {
|
||||
"_comment": "For stateful components (dialog, accordion, etc.)",
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "{animation.name.component-open} {animation.duration.normal} {animation.easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"closed": { "animation": "{animation.name.component-close} {animation.duration.normal} {animation.easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"elevation": {
|
||||
"$type": "elevation",
|
||||
"base": { "$value": "0" },
|
||||
"overlay": { "$value": "40" },
|
||||
"dropdown": { "$value": "50" },
|
||||
"dialog": { "$value": "50" },
|
||||
"tooltip": { "$value": "60" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"version": "string - W3C version or custom version",
|
||||
"created": "ISO timestamp - 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
"source": "code-import|explore|text",
|
||||
"theme_colors_guide": {
|
||||
"description": "Theme colors are the core brand identity colors that define the visual hierarchy and emotional tone of the design system",
|
||||
"primary": {
|
||||
"role": "Main brand color",
|
||||
"usage": "Primary actions (CTAs, key interactive elements, navigation highlights, primary buttons)",
|
||||
"contrast_requirement": "WCAG AA - 4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI components"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"secondary": {
|
||||
"role": "Supporting brand color",
|
||||
"usage": "Secondary actions and complementary elements (less prominent buttons, secondary navigation, supporting features)",
|
||||
"principle": "Should complement primary without competing for attention"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accent": {
|
||||
"role": "Highlight color for emphasis",
|
||||
"usage": "Attention-grabbing elements used sparingly (badges, notifications, special promotions, highlights)",
|
||||
"principle": "Should create strong visual contrast to draw focus"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"destructive": {
|
||||
"role": "Error and destructive action color",
|
||||
"usage": "Delete buttons, error messages, critical warnings",
|
||||
"principle": "Must signal danger or caution clearly"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"harmony_note": "All theme colors must work harmoniously together and align with brand identity. In multi-file extraction, prioritize definitions with semantic comments explaining brand intent."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"conflicts": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"token_name": "string - which token has conflicts",
|
||||
"category": "string - colors|typography|etc",
|
||||
"definitions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"value": "string - token value",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_number": "number",
|
||||
"context": "string - surrounding comment or null",
|
||||
"semantic_intent": "string - interpretation of definition"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"selected_value": "string - final chosen value",
|
||||
"selection_reason": "string - why this value was chosen"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"code_snippets": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": "colors|typography|spacing|shadows|border_radius|component",
|
||||
"token_name": "string - which token this snippet defines",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_start": "number",
|
||||
"line_end": "number",
|
||||
"snippet": "string - complete code block",
|
||||
"context_type": "css-variable|css-class|js-object|scss-variable|etc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"usage_recommendations": {
|
||||
"typography": {
|
||||
"common_sizes": {
|
||||
"small_text": "sm (0.875rem)",
|
||||
"body_text": "base (1rem)",
|
||||
"heading": "2xl-4xl"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"common_combinations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Heading + Body",
|
||||
"heading": "2xl",
|
||||
"body": "base",
|
||||
"use_case": "Article sections"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"spacing": {
|
||||
"size_guide": {
|
||||
"tight": "1-2 (0.25rem-0.5rem)",
|
||||
"normal": "4-6 (1rem-1.5rem)",
|
||||
"loose": "8-12 (2rem-3rem)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"common_patterns": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pattern": "padding-4 margin-bottom-6",
|
||||
"use_case": "Card content spacing",
|
||||
"pixel_value": "1rem padding, 1.5rem margin"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_field_rules": {
|
||||
"schema": "$schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification",
|
||||
"colors": "All color values MUST use OKLCH format with light/dark mode values",
|
||||
"types": "All tokens MUST include $type metadata (color, dimension, duration, component, elevation)",
|
||||
"states": "Color tokens MUST include interactive states (default, hover, active, disabled) where applicable",
|
||||
"fonts": "Typography font_families MUST include Google Fonts with fallback stacks",
|
||||
"spacing": "Spacing MUST use systematic scale (multiples of 0.25rem base unit)",
|
||||
"components": "Component definitions MUST be structured objects referencing other tokens via {token.path} syntax",
|
||||
"component_states": "Component definitions MUST include state-based styling (default, hover, active, focus, disabled)",
|
||||
"elevation": "elevation z-index values MUST be defined for layered components (overlay, dropdown, dialog, tooltip)",
|
||||
"metadata_guide": "_metadata.theme_colors_guide RECOMMENDED in all modes to help users understand theme color roles and usage",
|
||||
"metadata_conflicts": "_metadata.conflicts MANDATORY in Code Import mode when conflicting definitions detected",
|
||||
"metadata_snippets": "_metadata.code_snippets ONLY present in Code Import mode",
|
||||
"metadata_recommendations": "_metadata.usage_recommendations RECOMMENDED for universal components"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_required_components": {
|
||||
"_comment": "12+ components required, use pattern above",
|
||||
"button": "5 variants (primary, secondary, destructive, outline, ghost) + 3 sizes + states (default, hover, active, disabled, focus)",
|
||||
"card": "2 variants (default, interactive) + hover animations",
|
||||
"input": "states (default, focus, disabled, error) + 3 sizes",
|
||||
"dialog": "overlay + content + states (open, closed with animations)",
|
||||
"dropdown": "trigger (references button) + content + item (with states) + states (open, closed)",
|
||||
"toast": "2 variants (default, destructive) + states (enter, exit with animations)",
|
||||
"accordion": "trigger + content + states (open, closed with animations)",
|
||||
"tabs": "list + trigger (states: default, hover, active, disabled) + content",
|
||||
"switch": "root + thumb + states (checked, disabled)",
|
||||
"checkbox": "states (default, checked, disabled, focus)",
|
||||
"badge": "4 variants (default, secondary, destructive, outline)",
|
||||
"alert": "2 variants (default, destructive)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_token_reference_syntax": {
|
||||
"_comment": "Use {token.path} to reference other tokens",
|
||||
"examples": [
|
||||
"{color.interactive.primary.default}",
|
||||
"{spacing.4}",
|
||||
"{typography.font_sizes.sm}"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"resolution": "References are resolved during CSS generation",
|
||||
"nested": "Supports nested references (e.g., {component.button.base})"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_conflict_resolution_rules": {
|
||||
"_comment": "Code Import Mode only",
|
||||
"detect": "MUST detect when same token has different values across files",
|
||||
"read": "MUST read semantic comments (/* ... */) surrounding definitions",
|
||||
"prioritize": "MUST prioritize definitions with semantic intent over bare values",
|
||||
"record": "MUST record ALL definitions in conflicts array, not just selected one",
|
||||
"explain": "MUST explain selection_reason referencing semantic context",
|
||||
"verify": "For core theme tokens (primary, secondary, accent): MUST verify selected value aligns with overall color scheme described in comments"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,145 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
|
||||
"templates": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"target": "string - page/component name (e.g., hero-section, product-card)",
|
||||
"description": "string - layout description",
|
||||
"component_type": "universal|specialized",
|
||||
"device_type": "mobile|tablet|desktop|responsive",
|
||||
"layout_strategy": "string - grid-3col|flex-row|stack|sidebar|etc",
|
||||
|
||||
"structure": {
|
||||
"tag": "string - HTML5 semantic tag (header|nav|main|section|article|aside|footer|div|etc)",
|
||||
"attributes": {
|
||||
"class": "string - semantic class name",
|
||||
"role": "string - ARIA role (navigation|main|complementary|etc)",
|
||||
"aria-label": "string - ARIA label",
|
||||
"aria-describedby": "string - ARIA describedby",
|
||||
"data-state": "string - data attributes for state management (open|closed|etc)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"layout": {
|
||||
"_comment": "LAYOUT PROPERTIES ONLY - Use camelCase for property names",
|
||||
"display": "grid|flex|block|inline-flex",
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "{spacing.*} or CSS value (repeat(3, 1fr))",
|
||||
"grid-template-rows": "string",
|
||||
"gap": "{spacing.*}",
|
||||
"padding": "{spacing.*}",
|
||||
"margin": "{spacing.*}",
|
||||
"alignItems": "start|center|end|stretch",
|
||||
"justifyContent": "start|center|end|space-between|space-around",
|
||||
"flexDirection": "row|column",
|
||||
"flexWrap": "wrap|nowrap",
|
||||
"position": "relative|absolute|fixed|sticky",
|
||||
"top": "string",
|
||||
"right": "string",
|
||||
"bottom": "string",
|
||||
"left": "string",
|
||||
"width": "string",
|
||||
"height": "string",
|
||||
"maxWidth": "string",
|
||||
"minHeight": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"responsive": {
|
||||
"_comment": "ONLY properties that CHANGE at each breakpoint - NO repetition",
|
||||
"sm": {
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "1fr",
|
||||
"padding": "{spacing.4}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"md": {
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "repeat(2, 1fr)",
|
||||
"gap": "{spacing.6}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lg": {
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "repeat(3, 1fr)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"children": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"_comment": "Recursive structure - same fields as parent",
|
||||
"tag": "string",
|
||||
"attributes": {},
|
||||
"layout": {},
|
||||
"responsive": {},
|
||||
"children": [],
|
||||
"content": "string or {{placeholder}}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"content": "string - text content or {{placeholder}} for dynamic content"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"accessibility": {
|
||||
"patterns": [
|
||||
"string - ARIA patterns used (e.g., WAI-ARIA Tabs pattern, Dialog pattern)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"keyboard_navigation": [
|
||||
"string - keyboard shortcuts (e.g., Tab/Shift+Tab navigation, Escape to close)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_management": "string - focus trap strategy, initial focus target",
|
||||
"screen_reader_notes": [
|
||||
"string - screen reader announcements (e.g., Dialog opened, Tab selected)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"usage_guide": {
|
||||
"common_sizes": {
|
||||
"small": {
|
||||
"dimensions": "string - e.g., px-3 py-1.5 (height: ~32px)",
|
||||
"use_case": "string - Compact UI, mobile views"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"medium": {
|
||||
"dimensions": "string - e.g., px-4 py-2 (height: ~40px)",
|
||||
"use_case": "string - Default size for most contexts"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"large": {
|
||||
"dimensions": "string - e.g., px-6 py-3 (height: ~48px)",
|
||||
"use_case": "string - Prominent CTAs, hero sections"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"variant_recommendations": {
|
||||
"variant_name": {
|
||||
"description": "string - when to use this variant",
|
||||
"typical_actions": ["string - action examples"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"usage_context": [
|
||||
"string - typical usage scenarios (e.g., Landing page hero, Product listing grid)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"accessibility_tips": [
|
||||
"string - accessibility best practices (e.g., Ensure heading hierarchy, Add aria-label)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"extraction_metadata": {
|
||||
"source": "code-import|explore|text",
|
||||
"created": "ISO timestamp",
|
||||
"code_snippets": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"component_name": "string - which layout component",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_start": "number",
|
||||
"line_end": "number",
|
||||
"snippet": "string - complete HTML/CSS/JS code block",
|
||||
"context_type": "html-structure|css-utility|react-component|vue-component|etc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"_field_rules": {
|
||||
"schema": "$schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification",
|
||||
"semantic_tags": "structure.tag MUST use semantic HTML5 tags (header, nav, main, section, article, aside, footer)",
|
||||
"aria": "structure.attributes MUST include ARIA attributes where applicable (role, aria-label, aria-describedby)",
|
||||
"token_refs": "structure.layout MUST use {token.path} syntax for all spacing values",
|
||||
"no_visual": "structure.layout MUST NOT include visual styling (colors, fonts, shadows - those belong in design-tokens)",
|
||||
"layout_only": "structure.layout contains ONLY layout properties (display, grid, flex, position, spacing)",
|
||||
"breakpoints": "structure.responsive MUST define breakpoint-specific overrides matching breakpoint tokens",
|
||||
"no_repetition": "structure.responsive uses ONLY the properties that change at each breakpoint (no repetition)",
|
||||
"recursive": "structure.children inherits same structure recursively for nested elements",
|
||||
"component_type": "component_type MUST be 'universal' or 'specialized'",
|
||||
"accessibility": "accessibility MUST include patterns, keyboard_navigation, focus_management, screen_reader_notes",
|
||||
"usage_guide_universal": "usage_guide REQUIRED for universal components (buttons, inputs, forms, cards, navigation, etc.)",
|
||||
"usage_guide_specialized": "usage_guide OPTIONAL for specialized components (can be simplified or omitted)",
|
||||
"code_snippets": "extraction_metadata.code_snippets ONLY present in Code Import mode"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,538 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# CLI Tools Execution Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
1. [Configuration Reference](#configuration-reference)
|
||||
2. [Tool Selection](#tool-selection)
|
||||
3. [Prompt Template](#prompt-template)
|
||||
4. [CLI Execution](#cli-execution)
|
||||
5. [Auto-Invoke Triggers](#auto-invoke-triggers)
|
||||
6. [Best Practices](#best-practices)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Configuration File
|
||||
|
||||
**Path**: `~/.claude/cli-tools.json`
|
||||
|
||||
All tool availability, model selection, and routing are defined in this configuration file.
|
||||
|
||||
### Configuration Fields
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| `enabled` | Tool availability status |
|
||||
| `primaryModel` | Default model for the tool |
|
||||
| `secondaryModel` | Fallback model |
|
||||
| `tags` | Capability tags for routing |
|
||||
|
||||
### Tool Types
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Usage | Capabilities |
|
||||
|------|-------|--------------|
|
||||
| `builtin` | `--tool gemini` | Full (analysis + write tools) |
|
||||
| `cli-wrapper` | `--tool doubao` | Full (analysis + write tools) |
|
||||
| `api-endpoint` | `--tool g25` | **Analysis only** (no file write tools) |
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note**: `api-endpoint` tools only support analysis and code generation responses. They cannot create, modify, or delete files.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Selection
|
||||
|
||||
### Tag-Based Routing
|
||||
|
||||
Tools are selected based on **tags** defined in the configuration. Use tags to match task requirements to tool capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Common Tags
|
||||
|
||||
| Tag | Use Case |
|
||||
|-----|----------|
|
||||
| `analysis` | Code review, architecture analysis, exploration |
|
||||
| `implementation` | Feature development, bug fixes |
|
||||
| `documentation` | Doc generation, comments |
|
||||
| `testing` | Test creation, coverage analysis |
|
||||
| `refactoring` | Code restructuring |
|
||||
| `security` | Security audits, vulnerability scanning |
|
||||
|
||||
### Selection Algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Parse task intent → extract required capabilities
|
||||
2. Load cli-tools.json → get enabled tools with tags
|
||||
3. Match tags → filter tools supporting required capabilities
|
||||
4. Select tool → choose by priority (explicit > tag-match > default)
|
||||
5. Select model → use primaryModel, fallback to secondaryModel
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Selection Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─ Explicit --tool specified?
|
||||
│ └─→ YES: Use specified tool (validate enabled)
|
||||
│
|
||||
└─ NO: Tag-based selection
|
||||
├─ Task requires tags?
|
||||
│ └─→ Match tools with matching tags
|
||||
│ └─→ Multiple matches? Use first enabled
|
||||
│
|
||||
└─ No tag match?
|
||||
└─→ Use default tool (first enabled in config)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Explicit tool selection
|
||||
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool <tool-id> --mode <analysis|write|review>
|
||||
|
||||
# Model override
|
||||
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool <tool-id> --model <model-id> --mode <analysis|write>
|
||||
|
||||
# Code review (codex only)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool codex --mode review
|
||||
|
||||
# Tag-based auto-selection (future)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tags <tag1,tag2> --mode <analysis|write>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Tool Fallback Chain
|
||||
|
||||
When primary tool fails or is unavailable:
|
||||
1. Check `secondaryModel` for same tool
|
||||
2. Try next enabled tool with matching tags
|
||||
3. Fall back to default enabled tool
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt Template
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Prompt Template
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: [what] + [why] + [success criteria] + [constraints/scope]
|
||||
TASK: • [step 1: specific action] • [step 2: specific action] • [step 3: specific action]
|
||||
MODE: [analysis|write]
|
||||
CONTEXT: @[file patterns] | Memory: [session/tech/module context]
|
||||
EXPECTED: [deliverable format] + [quality criteria] + [structure requirements]
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: [domain constraints]" --tool <tool-id> --mode <analysis|write> --rule <category-template>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Intent Capture Checklist (Before CLI Execution)
|
||||
|
||||
**⚠️ CRITICAL**: Before executing any CLI command, verify these intent dimensions:
|
||||
|
||||
**Intent Validation Questions**:
|
||||
- [ ] Is the objective specific and measurable?
|
||||
- [ ] Are success criteria defined?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the scope clearly bounded?
|
||||
- [ ] Are constraints and limitations stated?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the expected output format clear?
|
||||
- [ ] Is the action level (read/write) explicit?
|
||||
|
||||
### Template Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Every command MUST include these fields:
|
||||
|
||||
- **PURPOSE**
|
||||
- Purpose: Goal + motivation + success
|
||||
- Components: What + Why + Success Criteria + Constraints
|
||||
- Bad Example: "Analyze code"
|
||||
- Good Example: "Identify security vulnerabilities in auth module to pass compliance audit; success = all OWASP Top 10 addressed; scope = src/auth/** only"
|
||||
|
||||
- **TASK**
|
||||
- Purpose: Actionable steps
|
||||
- Components: Specific verbs + targets
|
||||
- Bad Example: "• Review code • Find issues"
|
||||
- Good Example: "• Scan for SQL injection in query builders • Check XSS in template rendering • Verify CSRF token validation"
|
||||
|
||||
- **MODE**
|
||||
- Purpose: Permission level
|
||||
- Components: analysis / write / auto
|
||||
- Bad Example: (missing)
|
||||
- Good Example: "analysis" or "write"
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTEXT**
|
||||
- Purpose: File scope + history
|
||||
- Components: File patterns + Memory
|
||||
- Bad Example: "@**/*"
|
||||
- Good Example: "@src/auth/**/*.ts @shared/utils/security.ts \| Memory: Previous auth refactoring (WFS-001)"
|
||||
|
||||
- **EXPECTED**
|
||||
- Purpose: Output specification
|
||||
- Components: Format + Quality + Structure
|
||||
- Bad Example: "Report"
|
||||
- Good Example: "Markdown report with: severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, remediation code snippets, priority ranking"
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONSTRAINTS**
|
||||
- Purpose: Domain-specific constraints
|
||||
- Components: Scope limits, special requirements, focus areas
|
||||
- Bad Example: (missing or too vague)
|
||||
- Good Example: "Focus on authentication | Ignore test files | No breaking changes"
|
||||
|
||||
### CONTEXT Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: `CONTEXT: [file patterns] | Memory: [memory context]`
|
||||
|
||||
#### File Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@**/*`**: All files (default)
|
||||
- **`@src/**/*.ts`**: TypeScript in src
|
||||
- **`@../shared/**/*`**: Sibling directory (requires `--includeDirs`)
|
||||
- **`@CLAUDE.md`**: Specific file
|
||||
|
||||
#### Memory Context
|
||||
|
||||
Include when building on previous work:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Cross-task reference
|
||||
Memory: Building on auth refactoring (commit abc123), implementing refresh tokens
|
||||
|
||||
# Cross-module integration
|
||||
Memory: Integration with auth module, using shared error patterns from @shared/utils/errors.ts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Memory Sources**:
|
||||
- **Related Tasks**: Previous refactoring, extensions, conflict resolution
|
||||
- **Tech Stack Patterns**: Framework conventions, security guidelines
|
||||
- **Cross-Module References**: Integration points, shared utilities, type dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
#### Pattern Discovery Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
For complex requirements, discover files BEFORE CLI execution:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Step 1: Discover files (choose one method)
|
||||
# Method A: ACE semantic search (recommended)
|
||||
mcp__ace-tool__search_context(project_root_path="/path", query="React components with export")
|
||||
|
||||
# Method B: Ripgrep pattern search
|
||||
rg "export.*Component" --files-with-matches --type ts
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2: Build CONTEXT
|
||||
CONTEXT: @components/Auth.tsx @types/auth.d.ts | Memory: Previous type refactoring
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 3: Execute CLI
|
||||
ccw cli -p "..." --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --cd src
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### --rule Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
**Use `--rule` option to auto-load templates**:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-review-architecture
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Mode Protocol References
|
||||
|
||||
**`--rule` auto-loads Protocol based on mode**:
|
||||
- `--mode analysis` → analysis-protocol.md
|
||||
- `--mode write` → write-protocol.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Protocol Mapping**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`analysis`** mode
|
||||
- Permission: Read-only
|
||||
- Constraint: No file create/modify/delete
|
||||
|
||||
- **`write`** mode
|
||||
- Permission: Create/Modify/Delete files
|
||||
- Constraint: Full workflow execution
|
||||
|
||||
### Template System
|
||||
|
||||
**Available `--rule` template names**:
|
||||
|
||||
**Universal**:
|
||||
- `universal-rigorous-style` - Precise tasks
|
||||
- `universal-creative-style` - Exploratory tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis**:
|
||||
- `analysis-trace-code-execution` - Execution tracing
|
||||
- `analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause` - Bug diagnosis
|
||||
- `analysis-analyze-code-patterns` - Code patterns
|
||||
- `analysis-analyze-technical-document` - Document analysis
|
||||
- `analysis-review-architecture` - Architecture review
|
||||
- `analysis-review-code-quality` - Code review
|
||||
- `analysis-analyze-performance` - Performance analysis
|
||||
- `analysis-assess-security-risks` - Security assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Planning**:
|
||||
- `planning-plan-architecture-design` - Architecture design
|
||||
- `planning-breakdown-task-steps` - Task breakdown
|
||||
- `planning-design-component-spec` - Component design
|
||||
- `planning-plan-migration-strategy` - Migration strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Development**:
|
||||
- `development-implement-feature` - Feature implementation
|
||||
- `development-refactor-codebase` - Code refactoring
|
||||
- `development-generate-tests` - Test generation
|
||||
- `development-implement-component-ui` - UI component
|
||||
- `development-debug-runtime-issues` - Runtime debugging
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## CLI Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### MODE Options
|
||||
|
||||
- **`analysis`**
|
||||
- Permission: Read-only
|
||||
- Use For: Code review, architecture analysis, pattern discovery, exploration
|
||||
- Specification: Safe for all tools
|
||||
|
||||
- **`write`**
|
||||
- Permission: Create/Modify/Delete
|
||||
- Use For: Feature implementation, bug fixes, documentation, code creation, file modifications
|
||||
- Specification: Requires explicit `--mode write`
|
||||
|
||||
- **`review`**
|
||||
- Permission: Read-only (code review output)
|
||||
- Use For: Git-aware code review of uncommitted changes, branch diffs, specific commits
|
||||
- Specification: **codex only** - uses `codex review` subcommand
|
||||
- Tool Behavior:
|
||||
- `codex`: Executes `codex review` for structured code review
|
||||
- Other tools (gemini/qwen/claude): Accept mode but no operation change (treated as analysis)
|
||||
- **Constraint**: Target flags (`--uncommitted`, `--base`, `--commit`) and prompt are mutually exclusive
|
||||
- With prompt only: `ccw cli -p "Focus on security" --tool codex --mode review` (reviews uncommitted by default)
|
||||
- With target flag only: `ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --commit abc123` (no prompt allowed)
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Options
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--tool <tool>`**
|
||||
- Description: Tool from config (e.g., gemini, qwen, codex)
|
||||
- Default: First enabled tool in config
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--mode <mode>`**
|
||||
- Description: **REQUIRED**: analysis, write, review
|
||||
- Default: **NONE** (must specify)
|
||||
- Note: `review` mode triggers `codex review` subcommand for codex tool only
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--model <model>`**
|
||||
- Description: Model override
|
||||
- Default: Tool's primaryModel from config
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--cd <path>`**
|
||||
- Description: Working directory
|
||||
- Default: current
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--includeDirs <dirs>`**
|
||||
- Description: Additional directories (comma-separated)
|
||||
- Default: none
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--resume [id]`**
|
||||
- Description: Resume previous session
|
||||
- Default: -
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--rule <template>`**
|
||||
- Description: Template name, auto-loads protocol + template appended to prompt
|
||||
- Default: universal-rigorous-style
|
||||
- Auto-selects protocol based on --mode
|
||||
|
||||
### Directory Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
#### Working Directory (`--cd`)
|
||||
|
||||
When using `--cd`:
|
||||
- `@**/*` = Files within working directory tree only
|
||||
- CANNOT reference parent/sibling via @ alone
|
||||
- Must use `--includeDirs` for external directories
|
||||
|
||||
#### Include Directories (`--includeDirs`)
|
||||
|
||||
**TWO-STEP requirement for external files**:
|
||||
1. Add `--includeDirs` parameter
|
||||
2. Reference in CONTEXT with @ patterns
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Single directory
|
||||
ccw cli -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared
|
||||
|
||||
# Multiple directories
|
||||
ccw cli -p "..." --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared,../types,../utils
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Rule**: If CONTEXT contains `@../dir/**/*`, MUST include `--includeDirs ../dir`
|
||||
|
||||
**Benefits**: Excludes unrelated directories, reduces token usage
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Resume
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Use**:
|
||||
- Multi-round planning (analysis → planning → implementation)
|
||||
- Multi-model collaboration (tool A → tool B on same topic)
|
||||
- Topic continuity (building on previous findings)
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage**:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Continue analyzing" --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --resume # Resume last
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Fix issues found" --tool <tool-id> --mode write --resume <id> # Resume specific
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Merge findings" --tool <tool-id> --mode analysis --resume <id1>,<id2> # Merge multiple
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- **`--resume`**: Last session
|
||||
- **`--resume <id>`**: Specific session
|
||||
- **`--resume <id1>,<id2>`**: Merge sessions (comma-separated)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Assembly** (automatic):
|
||||
```
|
||||
=== PREVIOUS CONVERSATION ===
|
||||
USER PROMPT: [Previous prompt]
|
||||
ASSISTANT RESPONSE: [Previous output]
|
||||
=== CONTINUATION ===
|
||||
[Your new prompt]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Examples
|
||||
|
||||
#### Task-Type Specific Templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Task** (Security Audit):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Identify OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities in authentication module to pass security audit; success = all critical/high issues documented with remediation
|
||||
TASK: • Scan for injection flaws (SQL, command, LDAP) • Check authentication bypass vectors • Evaluate session management • Assess sensitive data exposure
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @src/auth/**/* @src/middleware/auth.ts | Memory: Using bcrypt for passwords, JWT for sessions
|
||||
EXPECTED: Security report with: severity matrix, file:line references, CVE mappings where applicable, remediation code snippets prioritized by risk
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on authentication | Ignore test files
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-assess-security-risks --cd src/auth
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Task** (New Feature):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Implement rate limiting for API endpoints to prevent abuse; must be configurable per-endpoint; backward compatible with existing clients
|
||||
TASK: • Create rate limiter middleware with sliding window • Implement per-route configuration • Add Redis backend for distributed state • Include bypass for internal services
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @src/middleware/**/* @src/config/**/* | Memory: Using Express.js, Redis already configured, existing middleware pattern in auth.ts
|
||||
EXPECTED: Production-ready code with: TypeScript types, unit tests, integration test, configuration example, migration guide
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Follow existing middleware patterns | No breaking changes
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode write --rule development-implement-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Bug Fix Task**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Fix memory leak in WebSocket connection handler causing server OOM after 24h; root cause must be identified before any fix
|
||||
TASK: • Trace connection lifecycle from open to close • Identify event listener accumulation • Check cleanup on disconnect • Verify garbage collection eligibility
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @src/websocket/**/* @src/services/connection-manager.ts | Memory: Using ws library, ~5000 concurrent connections in production
|
||||
EXPECTED: Root cause analysis with: memory profile, leak source (file:line), fix recommendation with code, verification steps
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on resource cleanup
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause --cd src
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Refactoring Task**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Refactor payment processing to use strategy pattern for multi-gateway support; no functional changes; all existing tests must pass
|
||||
TASK: • Extract gateway interface from current implementation • Create strategy classes for Stripe, PayPal • Implement factory for gateway selection • Migrate existing code to use strategies
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @src/payments/**/* @src/types/payment.ts | Memory: Currently only Stripe, adding PayPal next sprint, must support future gateways
|
||||
EXPECTED: Refactored code with: strategy interface, concrete implementations, factory class, updated tests, migration checklist
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Preserve all existing behavior | Tests must pass
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode write --rule development-refactor-codebase
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Review Task** (codex review mode):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Option 1: Custom prompt (reviews uncommitted changes by default)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Focus on security vulnerabilities and error handling" --tool codex --mode review
|
||||
|
||||
# Option 2: Target flag only (no prompt allowed with target flags)
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --base main
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --commit abc123
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note**: `--mode review` only triggers special behavior for `codex` tool. Target flags (`--uncommitted`, `--base`, `--commit`) and prompt are **mutually exclusive** - use one or the other, not both.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Permission Framework
|
||||
|
||||
**Single-Use Authorization**: Each execution requires explicit user instruction. Previous authorization does NOT carry over.
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode Hierarchy**:
|
||||
- `analysis`: Read-only, safe for auto-execution
|
||||
- `write`: Create/Modify/Delete files, full operations - requires explicit `--mode write`
|
||||
- `review`: Git-aware code review (codex only), read-only output - requires explicit `--mode review`
|
||||
- **Exception**: User provides clear instructions like "modify", "create", "implement"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto-Invoke Triggers
|
||||
|
||||
**Proactive CLI invocation** - Auto-invoke `ccw cli` when encountering these scenarios:
|
||||
|
||||
| Trigger Condition | Suggested Rule | When to Use |
|
||||
|-------------------|----------------|-------------|
|
||||
| **Self-repair fails** | `analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause` | After 1+ failed fix attempts |
|
||||
| **Ambiguous requirements** | `planning-breakdown-task-steps` | Task description lacks clarity |
|
||||
| **Architecture decisions** | `planning-plan-architecture-design` | Complex feature needs design |
|
||||
| **Pattern uncertainty** | `analysis-analyze-code-patterns` | Unsure of existing conventions |
|
||||
| **Critical code paths** | `analysis-assess-security-risks` | Security/performance sensitive |
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default mode**: `--mode analysis` (read-only, safe for auto-execution)
|
||||
- **No confirmation needed**: Invoke proactively when triggers match
|
||||
- **Wait for results**: Complete analysis before next action
|
||||
- **Tool selection**: Use context-appropriate tool or fallback chain (`gemini` → `qwen` → `codex`)
|
||||
- **Rule flexibility**: Suggested rules are guidelines, not requirements - choose the most appropriate template for the situation
|
||||
|
||||
### Example: Bug Fix with Auto-Invoke
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# After 1+ failed fix attempts, auto-invoke root cause analysis
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Identify root cause of [bug description]; success = actionable fix strategy
|
||||
TASK: • Trace execution flow • Identify failure point • Analyze state at failure • Determine fix approach
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @src/module/**/* | Memory: Previous fix attempts failed at [location]
|
||||
EXPECTED: Root cause analysis with: failure mechanism, stack trace interpretation, fix recommendation with code
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on [specific area]
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **Configuration-driven** - All tool selection from `cli-tools.json`
|
||||
- **Tag-based routing** - Match task requirements to tool capabilities
|
||||
- **Use tools early and often** - Tools are faster and more thorough
|
||||
- **Unified CLI** - Always use `ccw cli -p` for consistent parameter handling
|
||||
- **Default mode is analysis** - Omit `--mode` for read-only operations, explicitly use `--mode write` for file modifications
|
||||
- **Use `--rule` for templates** - Auto-loads protocol + template appended to prompt
|
||||
- **Write protection** - Require EXPLICIT `--mode write` for file operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **Use CCW unified interface** for all executions
|
||||
- **Always include template** - Use `--rule <template-name>` to load templates
|
||||
- **Be specific** - Clear PURPOSE, TASK, EXPECTED fields
|
||||
- **Include constraints** - File patterns, scope in CONSTRAINTS
|
||||
- **Leverage memory context** when building on previous work
|
||||
- **Discover patterns first** - Use rg/MCP before CLI execution
|
||||
- **Default to full context** - Use `@**/*` unless specific files needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Planning Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Purpose defined** - Clear goal and intent
|
||||
- [ ] **Mode selected** - `--mode analysis|write|review`
|
||||
- [ ] **Context gathered** - File references + memory (default `@**/*`)
|
||||
- [ ] **Directory navigation** - `--cd` and/or `--includeDirs`
|
||||
- [ ] **Tool selected** - Explicit `--tool` or tag-based auto-selection
|
||||
- [ ] **Rule template** - `--rule <template-name>` loads template
|
||||
- [ ] **Constraints** - Domain constraints in CONSTRAINTS field
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Load configuration** - Read `cli-tools.json` for available tools
|
||||
2. **Match by tags** - Select tool based on task requirements
|
||||
3. **Validate enabled** - Ensure selected tool is enabled
|
||||
4. **Execute with mode** - Always specify `--mode analysis|write|review`
|
||||
5. **Fallback gracefully** - Use secondary model or next matching tool on failure
|
||||
@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Coding Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Beliefs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Pursue good taste** - Eliminate edge cases to make code logic natural and elegant
|
||||
- **Embrace extreme simplicity** - Complexity is the root of all evil
|
||||
- **Be pragmatic** - Code must solve real-world problems, not hypothetical ones
|
||||
- **Data structures first** - Bad programmers worry about code; good programmers worry about data structures
|
||||
- **Never break backward compatibility** - Existing functionality is sacred and inviolable
|
||||
- **Incremental progress over big bangs** - Small changes that compile and pass tests
|
||||
- **Learning from existing code** - Study and plan before implementing
|
||||
- **Clear intent over clever code** - Be boring and obvious
|
||||
- **Follow existing code style** - Match import patterns, naming conventions, and formatting of existing codebase
|
||||
- **Minimize changes** - Only modify what's directly required; avoid refactoring, adding features, or "improving" code beyond the request
|
||||
- **No unsolicited documentation** - NEVER generate reports, documentation files, or summaries without explicit user request. If required, save to .workflow/.scratchpad/
|
||||
|
||||
## Simplicity Means
|
||||
|
||||
- Single responsibility per function/class
|
||||
- Avoid premature abstractions
|
||||
- No clever tricks - choose the boring solution
|
||||
- If you need to explain it, it's too complex
|
||||
|
||||
## Fix, Don't Hide
|
||||
|
||||
**Solve problems, don't silence symptoms** - Skipped tests, `@ts-ignore`, empty catch, `as any`, excessive timeouts = hiding bugs, not fixing them
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
- Make assumptions - verify with existing code
|
||||
- Generate reports, summaries, or documentation files without explicit user request
|
||||
- Use suppression mechanisms (`skip`, `ignore`, `disable`) without fixing root cause
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
- Plan complex tasks thoroughly before implementation
|
||||
- Generate task decomposition for multi-module work (>3 modules or >5 subtasks)
|
||||
- Track progress using TODO checklists for complex tasks
|
||||
- Validate planning documents before starting development
|
||||
- Commit working code incrementally
|
||||
- Update plan documentation and progress tracking as you go
|
||||
- Learn from existing implementations
|
||||
- Stop after 3 failed attempts and reassess
|
||||
- **Edit fallback**: When Edit tool fails 2+ times on same file, try Bash sed/awk first, then Write to recreate if still failing
|
||||
|
||||
## Learning the Codebase
|
||||
|
||||
- Find 3 similar features/components
|
||||
- Identify common patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Use same libraries/utilities when possible
|
||||
- Follow existing test patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Tooling
|
||||
|
||||
- Use project's existing build system
|
||||
- Use project's test framework
|
||||
- Use project's formatter/linter settings
|
||||
- Don't introduce new tools without strong justification
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Uniqueness Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Each layer owns its abstraction level** - no content sharing between layers
|
||||
- **Reference, don't duplicate** - point to other layers, never copy content
|
||||
- **Maintain perspective** - each layer sees the system at its appropriate scale
|
||||
- **Avoid implementation creep** - higher layers stay architectural
|
||||
|
||||
# Context Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Before implementation, always:
|
||||
- Identify 3+ existing similar patterns
|
||||
- Map dependencies and integration points
|
||||
- Understand testing framework and coding conventions
|
||||
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
|
||||
## Context Acquisition (MCP Tools Priority)
|
||||
|
||||
**For task context gathering and analysis, ALWAYS prefer MCP tools**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **mcp__ace-tool__search_context** - HIGHEST PRIORITY for code discovery
|
||||
- Semantic search with real-time codebase index
|
||||
- Use for: finding implementations, understanding architecture, locating patterns
|
||||
- Example: `mcp__ace-tool__search_context(project_root_path="/path", query="authentication logic")`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **smart_search** - Fallback for structured search
|
||||
- Use `smart_search(query="...")` for keyword/regex search
|
||||
- Use `smart_search(action="find_files", pattern="*.ts")` for file discovery
|
||||
- Supports modes: `auto`, `hybrid`, `exact`, `ripgrep`
|
||||
|
||||
3. **read_file** - Batch file reading
|
||||
- Read multiple files in parallel: `read_file(path="file1.ts")`, `read_file(path="file2.ts")`
|
||||
- Supports glob patterns: `read_file(path="src/**/*.config.ts")`
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority Order**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
ACE search_context (semantic) → smart_search (structured) → read_file (batch read) → shell commands (fallback)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER** use shell commands (`cat`, `find`, `grep`) when MCP tools are available.
|
||||
### read_file - Read File Contents
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: Read files found by smart_search
|
||||
|
||||
**How**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
read_file(path="/path/to/file.ts") // Single file
|
||||
read_file(path="/src/**/*.config.ts") // Pattern matching
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### edit_file - Modify Files
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: Built-in Edit tool fails or need advanced features
|
||||
|
||||
**How**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", old_string="...", new_string="...", mode="update")
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", line=10, content="...", mode="insert_after")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Modes**: `update` (replace text), `insert_after`, `insert_before`, `delete_line`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### write_file - Create/Overwrite Files
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: Create new files or completely replace content
|
||||
|
||||
**How**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
write_file(path="/new-file.ts", content="...")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Exa - External Search
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: Find documentation/examples outside codebase
|
||||
|
||||
**How**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
mcp__exa__search(query="React hooks 2025 documentation")
|
||||
mcp__exa__search(query="FastAPI auth example", numResults=10)
|
||||
mcp__exa__search(query="latest API docs", livecrawl="always")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Parameters**:
|
||||
- `query` (required): Search query string
|
||||
- `numResults` (optional): Number of results to return (default: 5)
|
||||
- `livecrawl` (optional): `"always"` or `"fallback"` for live crawling
|
||||
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# File Modification
|
||||
|
||||
Before modifying files, always:
|
||||
- Try built-in Edit tool first
|
||||
- Escalate to MCP tools when built-ins fail
|
||||
- Use write_file only as last resort
|
||||
|
||||
## MCP Tools Usage
|
||||
|
||||
### edit_file - Modify Files
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: Built-in Edit fails, need dry-run preview, or need line-based operations
|
||||
|
||||
**How**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", oldText="old", newText="new") // Replace text
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", oldText="old", newText="new", dryRun=true) // Preview diff
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", oldText="old", newText="new", replaceAll=true) // Replace all
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", mode="line", operation="insert_after", line=10, text="new line")
|
||||
edit_file(path="/file.ts", mode="line", operation="delete", line=5, end_line=8)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Modes**: `update` (replace text, default), `line` (line-based operations)
|
||||
|
||||
**Operations** (line mode): `insert_before`, `insert_after`, `replace`, `delete`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### write_file - Create/Overwrite Files
|
||||
|
||||
**When**: Create new files, completely replace content, or edit_file still fails
|
||||
|
||||
**How**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
write_file(path="/new-file.ts", content="file content here")
|
||||
write_file(path="/existing.ts", content="...", backup=true) // Create backup first
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Logic
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note**: Search priority is defined in `context-tools.md` - smart_search has HIGHEST PRIORITY for all discovery tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Search & Discovery** (defer to context-tools.md):
|
||||
1. **smart_search FIRST** for any code/file discovery
|
||||
2. Built-in Grep only for single-file exact line search (location already confirmed)
|
||||
3. Exa for external/public knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
**File Reading**:
|
||||
1. Unknown location → **smart_search first**, then Read
|
||||
2. Known confirmed file → Built-in Read directly
|
||||
3. Pattern matching → smart_search (action="find_files")
|
||||
|
||||
**File Editing**:
|
||||
1. Always try built-in Edit first
|
||||
2. Fails 1+ times → edit_file (MCP)
|
||||
3. Still fails → write_file (MCP)
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision Triggers
|
||||
|
||||
**Search tasks** → Always start with smart_search (per context-tools.md)
|
||||
**Known file edits** → Start with built-in Edit, escalate to MCP if fails
|
||||
**External knowledge** → Use Exa
|
||||
@@ -1,336 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Review Directory Specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Unified directory structure for all review commands (session-based and module-based) within workflow sessions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Session-Based**: All reviews run within a workflow session context
|
||||
2. **Unified Structure**: Same directory layout for all review types
|
||||
3. **Type Differentiation**: Review type indicated by metadata, not directory structure
|
||||
4. **Progressive Creation**: Directories created on-demand during review execution
|
||||
5. **Archive Support**: Reviews archived with their parent session
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Base Location
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Complete Structure
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
|
||||
├── review-state.json # Review orchestrator state machine
|
||||
├── review-progress.json # Real-time progress for dashboard polling
|
||||
├── review-metadata.json # Review configuration and scope
|
||||
├── dimensions/ # Per-dimension analysis results
|
||||
│ ├── security.json
|
||||
│ ├── architecture.json
|
||||
│ ├── quality.json
|
||||
│ ├── action-items.json
|
||||
│ ├── performance.json
|
||||
│ ├── maintainability.json
|
||||
│ └── best-practices.json
|
||||
├── iterations/ # Deep-dive iteration results
|
||||
│ ├── iteration-1-finding-{uuid}.json
|
||||
│ ├── iteration-2-finding-{uuid}.json
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
├── reports/ # Human-readable reports
|
||||
│ ├── security-analysis.md
|
||||
│ ├── security-cli-output.txt
|
||||
│ ├── architecture-analysis.md
|
||||
│ ├── architecture-cli-output.txt
|
||||
│ ├── ...
|
||||
│ ├── deep-dive-1-{uuid}.md
|
||||
│ └── deep-dive-2-{uuid}.md
|
||||
├── REVIEW-SUMMARY.md # Final consolidated summary
|
||||
└── dashboard.html # Interactive review dashboard
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Metadata Schema
|
||||
|
||||
**File**: `review-metadata.json`
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
|
||||
"review_type": "module|session",
|
||||
"session_id": "WFS-auth-system",
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"type": "module|session",
|
||||
"module_scope": {
|
||||
"target_pattern": "src/auth/**",
|
||||
"resolved_files": [
|
||||
"src/auth/service.ts",
|
||||
"src/auth/validator.ts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"file_count": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"session_scope": {
|
||||
"commit_range": "abc123..def456",
|
||||
"changed_files": [
|
||||
"src/auth/service.ts",
|
||||
"src/payment/processor.ts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"file_count": 2
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
|
||||
"max_iterations": 3,
|
||||
"cli_tools": {
|
||||
"primary": "gemini",
|
||||
"fallback": ["qwen", "codex"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Review State Schema
|
||||
|
||||
**File**: `review-state.json`
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
|
||||
"phase": "init|parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
|
||||
"current_iteration": 1,
|
||||
"dimensions_status": {
|
||||
"security": "pending|in_progress|completed|failed",
|
||||
"architecture": "completed",
|
||||
"quality": "in_progress",
|
||||
"action-items": "pending",
|
||||
"performance": "pending",
|
||||
"maintainability": "pending",
|
||||
"best-practices": "pending"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"severity_distribution": {
|
||||
"critical": 2,
|
||||
"high": 5,
|
||||
"medium": 12,
|
||||
"low": 8
|
||||
},
|
||||
"critical_files": [
|
||||
"src/auth/service.ts",
|
||||
"src/payment/processor.ts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"iterations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"iteration": 1,
|
||||
"findings_selected": ["uuid-1", "uuid-2", "uuid-3"],
|
||||
"completed_at": "2025-01-25T15:30:00Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"completion_criteria": {
|
||||
"critical_count": 0,
|
||||
"high_count_threshold": 5,
|
||||
"max_iterations": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"next_action": "execute_parallel_reviews|aggregate_findings|execute_deep_dive|generate_final_report|complete"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
**review-session-cycle** (auto-discover):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Auto-detect active session
|
||||
/workflow:review-session-cycle
|
||||
|
||||
# Or specify session explicitly
|
||||
/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-auth-system
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**review-module-cycle** (require session):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Must have active session or specify one
|
||||
/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/** --session WFS-auth-system
|
||||
|
||||
# Or use active session
|
||||
/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Creation Logic
|
||||
|
||||
**For review-module-cycle**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Check Active Session**: Search `.workflow/active/WFS-*`
|
||||
2. **If Found**: Use active session's `.review/` directory
|
||||
3. **If Not Found**:
|
||||
- **Option A** (Recommended): Prompt user to create session first
|
||||
- **Option B**: Auto-create review-only session: `WFS-review-{pattern-hash}`
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Flow**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Step 1: Start session
|
||||
/workflow:session:start --new "Review auth module"
|
||||
# Creates: .workflow/active/WFS-review-auth-module/
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2: Run review
|
||||
/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**
|
||||
# Creates: .workflow/active/WFS-review-auth-module/.review/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Phase 1 Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Both Commands Must:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Session Discovery**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Check for active session
|
||||
const sessions = Glob('.workflow/active/WFS-*');
|
||||
if (sessions.length === 0) {
|
||||
// Prompt user to create session first
|
||||
error("No active session found. Please run /workflow:session:start first");
|
||||
}
|
||||
const sessionId = sessions[0].match(/WFS-[^/]+/)[0];
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Create .review/ Structure**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const reviewDir = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.review/`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Create directory structure
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p ${reviewDir}/dimensions`);
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p ${reviewDir}/iterations`);
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p ${reviewDir}/reports`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Initialize Metadata**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Write review-metadata.json
|
||||
Write(`${reviewDir}/review-metadata.json`, JSON.stringify({
|
||||
review_id: `review-${timestamp}`,
|
||||
review_type: "module|session",
|
||||
session_id: sessionId,
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
scope: {...},
|
||||
dimensions: [...],
|
||||
max_iterations: 3,
|
||||
cli_tools: {...}
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// Write review-state.json
|
||||
Write(`${reviewDir}/review-state.json`, JSON.stringify({
|
||||
review_id: `review-${timestamp}`,
|
||||
phase: "init",
|
||||
current_iteration: 0,
|
||||
dimensions_status: {},
|
||||
severity_distribution: {},
|
||||
critical_files: [],
|
||||
iterations: [],
|
||||
completion_criteria: {},
|
||||
next_action: "execute_parallel_reviews"
|
||||
}));
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Generate Dashboard**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const template = Read('~/.claude/templates/review-cycle-dashboard.html');
|
||||
const dashboard = template
|
||||
.replace('{{SESSION_ID}}', sessionId)
|
||||
.replace('{{REVIEW_TYPE}}', reviewType)
|
||||
.replace('{{REVIEW_DIR}}', reviewDir);
|
||||
Write(`${reviewDir}/dashboard.html`, dashboard);
|
||||
|
||||
// Output to user
|
||||
console.log(`📊 Review Dashboard: file://${absolutePath(reviewDir)}/dashboard.html`);
|
||||
console.log(`📂 Review Output: ${reviewDir}`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Archive Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### On Session Completion
|
||||
|
||||
When `/workflow:session:complete` is called:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Preserve Review Directory**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Move entire session including .review/
|
||||
Bash(`mv .workflow/active/${sessionId} .workflow/archives/${sessionId}`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Review Archive Structure**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/archives/WFS-auth-system/
|
||||
├── workflow-session.json
|
||||
├── IMPL_PLAN.md
|
||||
├── TODO_LIST.md
|
||||
├── .task/
|
||||
├── .summaries/
|
||||
└── .review/ # Review results preserved
|
||||
├── review-metadata.json
|
||||
├── REVIEW-SUMMARY.md
|
||||
└── dashboard.html
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Access Archived Reviews**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Open archived dashboard
|
||||
start .workflow/archives/WFS-auth-system/.review/dashboard.html
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Unified Structure
|
||||
- Same directory layout for all review types
|
||||
- Consistent file naming and schemas
|
||||
- Easier maintenance and tooling
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Session Integration
|
||||
- Review history tracked with implementation
|
||||
- Easy correlation between code changes and reviews
|
||||
- Simplified archiving and retrieval
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Progressive Creation
|
||||
- Directories created only when needed
|
||||
- No upfront overhead
|
||||
- Clean session initialization
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Type Flexibility
|
||||
- Module-based and session-based reviews in same structure
|
||||
- Type indicated by metadata, not directory layout
|
||||
- Easy to add new review types
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Dashboard Consistency
|
||||
- Same dashboard template for both types
|
||||
- Unified progress tracking
|
||||
- Consistent user experience
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Path
|
||||
|
||||
### For Existing Commands
|
||||
|
||||
**review-session-cycle**:
|
||||
1. Change output from `.workflow/.reviews/session-{id}/` to `.workflow/active/{session-id}/.review/`
|
||||
2. Update Phase 1 to use session discovery
|
||||
3. Add review-metadata.json creation
|
||||
|
||||
**review-module-cycle**:
|
||||
1. Add session requirement (or auto-create)
|
||||
2. Change output from `.workflow/.reviews/module-{hash}/` to `.workflow/active/{session-id}/.review/`
|
||||
3. Update Phase 1 to use session discovery
|
||||
4. Add review-metadata.json creation
|
||||
|
||||
### Backward Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**For existing standalone reviews** in `.workflow/.reviews/`:
|
||||
- Keep for reference
|
||||
- Document migration in README
|
||||
- Provide migration script if needed
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Update workflow-architecture.md with .review/ structure
|
||||
- [ ] Update review-session-cycle.md command specification
|
||||
- [ ] Update review-module-cycle.md command specification
|
||||
- [ ] Update review-cycle-dashboard.html template
|
||||
- [ ] Create review-metadata.json schema validation
|
||||
- [ ] Update /workflow:session:complete to preserve .review/
|
||||
- [ ] Update documentation examples
|
||||
- [ ] Test both review types with new structure
|
||||
- [ ] Validate dashboard compatibility
|
||||
- [ ] Document migration path for existing reviews
|
||||
@@ -1,251 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"description": "Test quality and code validation configuration for AI-generated code",
|
||||
|
||||
"code_validation": {
|
||||
"description": "Pre-test validation for AI-generated code common errors",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"phases": {
|
||||
"L0_compilation": {
|
||||
"description": "TypeScript/JavaScript compilation check",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"commands": {
|
||||
"typescript": "npx tsc --noEmit --skipLibCheck",
|
||||
"javascript": "node --check"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"critical": true,
|
||||
"failure_blocks_tests": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"L0_imports": {
|
||||
"description": "Import statement validation",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"checks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "unresolved_imports",
|
||||
"description": "Check for unresolved module imports",
|
||||
"pattern": "Cannot find module|Module not found|Unable to resolve",
|
||||
"severity": "critical"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "circular_imports",
|
||||
"description": "Check for circular dependencies",
|
||||
"tool": "madge",
|
||||
"command": "npx madge --circular --extensions ts,tsx,js,jsx",
|
||||
"severity": "warning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "duplicate_imports",
|
||||
"description": "Check for duplicate imports",
|
||||
"eslint_rule": "import/no-duplicates",
|
||||
"severity": "error"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "unused_imports",
|
||||
"description": "Check for unused imports",
|
||||
"eslint_rule": "unused-imports/no-unused-imports",
|
||||
"severity": "warning"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"L0_variables": {
|
||||
"description": "Variable declaration validation",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"checks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "redeclaration",
|
||||
"description": "Check for variable redeclaration",
|
||||
"pattern": "Cannot redeclare|Duplicate identifier|has already been declared",
|
||||
"severity": "critical"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "scope_conflict",
|
||||
"description": "Check for scope conflicts",
|
||||
"eslint_rule": "no-shadow",
|
||||
"severity": "error"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "undefined_vars",
|
||||
"description": "Check for undefined variables",
|
||||
"eslint_rule": "no-undef",
|
||||
"severity": "critical"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "unused_vars",
|
||||
"description": "Check for unused variables",
|
||||
"eslint_rule": "@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars",
|
||||
"severity": "warning"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"L0_types": {
|
||||
"description": "TypeScript type validation",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"checks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "type_mismatch",
|
||||
"description": "Check for type mismatches",
|
||||
"pattern": "Type .* is not assignable to type",
|
||||
"severity": "critical"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "missing_types",
|
||||
"description": "Check for missing type definitions",
|
||||
"pattern": "Could not find a declaration file",
|
||||
"severity": "warning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "any_abuse",
|
||||
"description": "Check for excessive any type usage",
|
||||
"eslint_rule": "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any",
|
||||
"severity": "warning",
|
||||
"max_occurrences": 5
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "implicit_any",
|
||||
"description": "Check for implicit any",
|
||||
"pattern": "implicitly has an 'any' type",
|
||||
"severity": "error"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"severity_thresholds": {
|
||||
"critical": 0,
|
||||
"error": 3,
|
||||
"warning": 10
|
||||
},
|
||||
"max_retries": 2,
|
||||
"auto_fix": {
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"safe_fixes_only": true,
|
||||
"fixable_categories": ["imports", "formatting", "unused_vars"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"test_quality": {
|
||||
"description": "Test file quality validation (IMPL-001.5)",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"coverage": {
|
||||
"minimum_threshold": 80,
|
||||
"branch_threshold": 70,
|
||||
"function_threshold": 80,
|
||||
"line_threshold": 80
|
||||
},
|
||||
"anti_patterns": {
|
||||
"empty_test_body": {
|
||||
"pattern": "it\\(['\"].*['\"],\\s*\\(\\)\\s*=>\\s*\\{\\s*\\}\\)",
|
||||
"severity": "critical",
|
||||
"description": "Test with empty body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"missing_assertion": {
|
||||
"pattern": "it\\(['\"].*['\"],.*\\{[^}]*\\}\\)(?![\\s\\S]*expect)",
|
||||
"severity": "critical",
|
||||
"description": "Test without expect() assertion"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"skipped_without_reason": {
|
||||
"pattern": "(it|describe)\\.skip\\(['\"][^'\"]*['\"](?!.*\\/\\/ )",
|
||||
"severity": "error",
|
||||
"description": "Skipped test without comment explaining why"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"todo_test": {
|
||||
"pattern": "(it|test)\\.todo\\(",
|
||||
"severity": "warning",
|
||||
"description": "TODO test placeholder"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"only_test": {
|
||||
"pattern": "(it|describe)\\.only\\(",
|
||||
"severity": "critical",
|
||||
"description": "Focused test (will skip other tests)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"required_test_types": {
|
||||
"unit": {
|
||||
"min_per_function": 1,
|
||||
"must_include": ["happy_path"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"negative": {
|
||||
"min_per_public_api": 1,
|
||||
"description": "Error handling tests for public APIs"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"edge_case": {
|
||||
"required_scenarios": ["null", "undefined", "empty_string", "empty_array", "boundary_values"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"ai_specific_checks": {
|
||||
"description": "Checks specifically for AI-generated code patterns",
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"checks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "hallucinated_imports",
|
||||
"description": "Check for imports of non-existent packages",
|
||||
"validation": "npm_package_exists",
|
||||
"severity": "critical"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "inconsistent_naming",
|
||||
"description": "Check for naming inconsistencies within file",
|
||||
"pattern": "function (\\w+).*\\1(?!\\()",
|
||||
"severity": "warning"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "placeholder_code",
|
||||
"description": "Check for AI placeholder comments",
|
||||
"patterns": [
|
||||
"// TODO: implement",
|
||||
"// Add your code here",
|
||||
"// Implementation pending",
|
||||
"throw new Error\\(['\"]Not implemented['\"]\\)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"severity": "error"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "mock_in_production",
|
||||
"description": "Check for mock/stub code in production files",
|
||||
"patterns": [
|
||||
"jest\\.mock\\(",
|
||||
"sinon\\.",
|
||||
"vi\\.mock\\("
|
||||
],
|
||||
"exclude_paths": ["**/*.test.*", "**/*.spec.*", "**/test/**", "**/__tests__/**"],
|
||||
"severity": "critical"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"validation_commands": {
|
||||
"typescript_check": {
|
||||
"command": "npx tsc --noEmit --skipLibCheck",
|
||||
"timeout": 60000,
|
||||
"parse_errors": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"eslint_check": {
|
||||
"command": "npx eslint --format json",
|
||||
"timeout": 60000,
|
||||
"auto_fix_command": "npx eslint --fix"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"circular_deps_check": {
|
||||
"command": "npx madge --circular --extensions ts,tsx,js,jsx",
|
||||
"timeout": 30000
|
||||
},
|
||||
"package_validation": {
|
||||
"command": "npm ls --json",
|
||||
"timeout": 30000
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"gate_decisions": {
|
||||
"pass_criteria": {
|
||||
"critical_issues": 0,
|
||||
"error_issues": "<=3",
|
||||
"warning_issues": "<=10"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {
|
||||
"pass": "Proceed to IMPL-001.5 (Test Quality Gate)",
|
||||
"soft_fail": "Auto-fix and retry (max 2 attempts)",
|
||||
"hard_fail": "Block and report to user with fix suggestions"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,216 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Tool Strategy - When to Use What
|
||||
|
||||
> **Focus**: Decision triggers and selection logic, NOT syntax (already registered with Claude)
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Need context?
|
||||
├─ Exa available? → Use Exa (fastest, most comprehensive)
|
||||
├─ Large codebase (>500 files)? → codex_lens
|
||||
├─ Known files (<5)? → Read tool
|
||||
└─ Unknown files? → smart_search → Read tool
|
||||
|
||||
Need to modify files?
|
||||
├─ Built-in Edit fails? → mcp__ccw-tools__edit_file
|
||||
└─ Still fails? → mcp__ccw-tools__write_file
|
||||
|
||||
Need to search?
|
||||
├─ Semantic/concept search? → smart_search (mode=semantic)
|
||||
├─ Exact pattern match? → Grep tool
|
||||
└─ Multiple search modes needed? → smart_search (mode=auto)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Context Gathering Tools
|
||||
|
||||
### Exa (`mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use When**:
|
||||
- ✅ Researching external APIs, libraries, frameworks
|
||||
- ✅ Need recent documentation (post-cutoff knowledge)
|
||||
- ✅ Looking for implementation examples in public repos
|
||||
- ✅ Comparing architectural patterns across projects
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't Use When**:
|
||||
- ❌ Searching internal codebase (use smart_search/codex_lens)
|
||||
- ❌ Files already in working directory (use Read)
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Indicators**:
|
||||
- User mentions specific library/framework names
|
||||
- Questions about "best practices", "how does X work"
|
||||
- Need to verify current API signatures
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### read_file (`mcp__ccw-tools__read_file`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use When**:
|
||||
- ✅ Reading multiple related files at once (batch reading)
|
||||
- ✅ Need directory traversal with pattern matching
|
||||
- ✅ Searching file content with regex (`contentPattern`)
|
||||
- ✅ Want to limit depth/file count for large directories
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't Use When**:
|
||||
- ❌ Single file read → Use built-in Read tool (faster)
|
||||
- ❌ Unknown file locations → Use smart_search first
|
||||
- ❌ Need semantic search → Use smart_search or codex_lens
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Indicators**:
|
||||
- Need to read "all TypeScript files in src/"
|
||||
- Need to find "files containing TODO comments"
|
||||
- Want to read "up to 20 config files"
|
||||
|
||||
**Advantages over Built-in Read**:
|
||||
- Batch operation (multiple files in one call)
|
||||
- Pattern-based filtering (glob + content regex)
|
||||
- Directory traversal with depth control
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### codex_lens (`mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use When**:
|
||||
- ✅ Large codebase (>500 files) requiring repeated searches
|
||||
- ✅ Need semantic understanding of code relationships
|
||||
- ✅ Working across multiple sessions (persistent index)
|
||||
- ✅ Symbol-level navigation needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't Use When**:
|
||||
- ❌ Small project (<100 files) → Use smart_search (no indexing overhead)
|
||||
- ❌ One-time search → Use smart_search or Grep
|
||||
- ❌ Files change frequently → Indexing overhead not worth it
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Indicators**:
|
||||
- "Find all implementations of interface X"
|
||||
- "What calls this function across the codebase?"
|
||||
- Multi-session workflow on same codebase
|
||||
|
||||
**Action Selection**:
|
||||
- `init`: First time in new codebase
|
||||
- `search`: Find code patterns
|
||||
- `search_files`: Find files by path/name pattern
|
||||
- `symbol`: Get symbols in specific file
|
||||
- `status`: Check if index exists/is stale
|
||||
- `clean`: Remove stale index
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### smart_search (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use When**:
|
||||
- ✅ Don't know exact file locations
|
||||
- ✅ Need concept/semantic search ("authentication logic")
|
||||
- ✅ Medium-sized codebase (100-500 files)
|
||||
- ✅ One-time or infrequent searches
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't Use When**:
|
||||
- ❌ Known exact file path → Use Read directly
|
||||
- ❌ Large codebase + repeated searches → Use codex_lens
|
||||
- ❌ Exact pattern match → Use Grep (faster)
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode Selection**:
|
||||
- `auto`: Let tool decide (default, safest)
|
||||
- `exact`: Know exact pattern, need fast results
|
||||
- `fuzzy`: Typo-tolerant file/symbol names
|
||||
- `semantic`: Concept-based ("error handling", "data validation")
|
||||
- `graph`: Dependency/relationship analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Indicators**:
|
||||
- "Find files related to user authentication"
|
||||
- "Where is the payment processing logic?"
|
||||
- "Locate database connection setup"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. File Modification Tools
|
||||
|
||||
### edit_file (`mcp__ccw-tools__edit_file`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use When**:
|
||||
- ✅ Built-in Edit tool failed 1+ times
|
||||
- ✅ Need dry-run preview before applying
|
||||
- ✅ Need line-based operations (insert_after, insert_before)
|
||||
- ✅ Need to replace all occurrences
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't Use When**:
|
||||
- ❌ Built-in Edit hasn't failed yet → Try built-in first
|
||||
- ❌ Need to create new file → Use write_file
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Indicators**:
|
||||
- Built-in Edit returns "old_string not found"
|
||||
- Built-in Edit fails due to whitespace/formatting
|
||||
- Need to verify changes before applying (dryRun=true)
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode Selection**:
|
||||
- `mode=update`: Replace text (similar to built-in Edit)
|
||||
- `mode=line`: Line-based operations (insert_after, insert_before, delete)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### write_file (`mcp__ccw-tools__write_file`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use When**:
|
||||
- ✅ Creating brand new files
|
||||
- ✅ MCP edit_file still fails (last resort)
|
||||
- ✅ Need to completely replace file content
|
||||
- ✅ Need backup before overwriting
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't Use When**:
|
||||
- ❌ File exists + small change → Use Edit tools
|
||||
- ❌ Built-in Edit hasn't been tried → Try built-in Edit first
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Indicators**:
|
||||
- All Edit attempts failed
|
||||
- Need to create new file with specific content
|
||||
- User explicitly asks to "recreate file"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Decision Logic
|
||||
|
||||
### File Reading Priority
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Known single file? → Built-in Read
|
||||
2. Multiple files OR pattern matching? → mcp__ccw-tools__read_file
|
||||
3. Unknown location? → smart_search, then Read
|
||||
4. Large codebase + repeated access? → codex_lens
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### File Editing Priority
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Always try built-in Edit first
|
||||
2. Fails 1+ times? → mcp__ccw-tools__edit_file
|
||||
3. Still fails? → mcp__ccw-tools__write_file (last resort)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Search Tool Priority
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. External knowledge? → Exa
|
||||
2. Exact pattern in small codebase? → Built-in Grep
|
||||
3. Semantic/unknown location? → smart_search
|
||||
4. Large codebase + repeated searches? → codex_lens
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Anti-Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Don't**:
|
||||
- Use codex_lens for one-time searches in small projects
|
||||
- Use smart_search when file path is already known
|
||||
- Use write_file before trying Edit tools
|
||||
- Use Exa for internal codebase searches
|
||||
- Use read_file for single file when Read tool works
|
||||
|
||||
**Do**:
|
||||
- Start with simplest tool (Read, Edit, Grep)
|
||||
- Escalate to MCP tools when built-ins fail
|
||||
- Use semantic search (smart_search) for exploratory tasks
|
||||
- Use indexed search (codex_lens) for large, stable codebases
|
||||
- Use Exa for external/public knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Windows Platform Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
## Path Format
|
||||
|
||||
- **MCP Tools**: `D:\\path\\file.txt`
|
||||
- **Bash**: `D:/path/file.txt` or `/d/path/file.txt`
|
||||
- **Relative**: `./src/index.ts`
|
||||
|
||||
## Bash Rules (Prevent Garbage Files)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Null redirect**: `command > NUL 2>&1`
|
||||
2. **Quote all**: `echo "$VAR"`, `cat "file name.txt"`
|
||||
3. **Variable assignment**: `export VAR=value && command`
|
||||
4. **Regex escape**: `grep -F "State<T>"` or `grep "State\<T\>"`
|
||||
5. **Pipe output**: `command 2>&1 | ...` (avoid bare command output)
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Priority
|
||||
|
||||
MCP Tools > PowerShell > Git Bash > cmd
|
||||
@@ -1,942 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Workflow Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the complete workflow system architecture using a **JSON-only data model**, **marker-based session management**, and **unified file structure** with dynamic task decomposition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### JSON-Only Data Model
|
||||
**JSON files (.task/IMPL-*.json) are the only authoritative source of task state. All markdown documents are read-only generated views.**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Task State**: Stored exclusively in JSON files
|
||||
- **Documents**: Generated on-demand from JSON data
|
||||
- **No Synchronization**: Eliminates bidirectional sync complexity
|
||||
- **Performance**: Direct JSON access without parsing overhead
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Design Decisions
|
||||
- **JSON files are the single source of truth** - All markdown documents are read-only generated views
|
||||
- **Marker files for session tracking** - Ultra-simple active session management
|
||||
- **Unified file structure definition** - Same structure template for all workflows, created on-demand
|
||||
- **Dynamic task decomposition** - Subtasks created as needed during execution
|
||||
- **On-demand file creation** - Directories and files created only when required
|
||||
- **Agent-agnostic task definitions** - Complete context preserved for autonomous execution
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Management
|
||||
|
||||
### Directory-Based Session Management
|
||||
**Simple Location-Based Tracking**: Sessions in `.workflow/active/` directory
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
.workflow/
|
||||
├── active/
|
||||
│ ├── WFS-oauth-integration/ # Active session directory
|
||||
│ ├── WFS-user-profile/ # Active session directory
|
||||
│ └── WFS-bug-fix-123/ # Active session directory
|
||||
└── archives/
|
||||
└── WFS-old-feature/ # Archived session (completed)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Operations
|
||||
|
||||
#### Detect Active Session(s)
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
active_sessions=$(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
|
||||
count=$(echo "$active_sessions" | wc -l)
|
||||
|
||||
if [ -z "$active_sessions" ]; then
|
||||
echo "No active session"
|
||||
elif [ "$count" -eq 1 ]; then
|
||||
session_name=$(basename "$active_sessions")
|
||||
echo "Active session: $session_name"
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo "Multiple sessions found:"
|
||||
echo "$active_sessions" | while read session_dir; do
|
||||
session=$(basename "$session_dir")
|
||||
echo " - $session"
|
||||
done
|
||||
echo "Please specify which session to work with"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Archive Session
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mv .workflow/active/WFS-feature .workflow/archives/WFS-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session State Tracking
|
||||
Each session directory contains `workflow-session.json`:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "WFS-[topic-slug]",
|
||||
"project": "feature description",
|
||||
"type": "simple|medium|complex",
|
||||
"current_phase": "PLAN|IMPLEMENT|REVIEW",
|
||||
"status": "active|paused|completed",
|
||||
"progress": {
|
||||
"completed_phases": ["PLAN"],
|
||||
"current_tasks": ["IMPL-1", "IMPL-2"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Task System
|
||||
|
||||
### Hierarchical Task Structure
|
||||
**Maximum Depth**: 2 levels (IMPL-N.M format)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
IMPL-1 # Main task
|
||||
IMPL-1.1 # Subtask of IMPL-1 (dynamically created)
|
||||
IMPL-1.2 # Another subtask of IMPL-1
|
||||
IMPL-2 # Another main task
|
||||
IMPL-2.1 # Subtask of IMPL-2 (dynamically created)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task Status Rules**:
|
||||
- **Container tasks**: Parent tasks with subtasks (cannot be directly executed)
|
||||
- **Leaf tasks**: Only these can be executed directly
|
||||
- **Status inheritance**: Parent status derived from subtask completion
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhanced Task JSON Schema
|
||||
All task files use this unified 6-field schema with optional artifacts enhancement:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IMPL-1.2",
|
||||
"title": "Implement JWT authentication",
|
||||
"status": "pending|active|completed|blocked|container",
|
||||
"context_package_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.process/context-package.json",
|
||||
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
|
||||
"agent": "@code-developer|@action-planning-agent|@test-fix-agent|@universal-executor"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"requirements": ["JWT authentication", "OAuth2 support"],
|
||||
"focus_paths": ["src/auth", "tests/auth", "config/auth.json"],
|
||||
"acceptance": ["JWT validation works", "OAuth flow complete"],
|
||||
"parent": "IMPL-1",
|
||||
"depends_on": ["IMPL-1.1"],
|
||||
"inherited": {
|
||||
"from": "IMPL-1",
|
||||
"context": ["Authentication system design completed"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"shared_context": {
|
||||
"auth_strategy": "JWT with refresh tokens"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"artifacts": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "role_analyses",
|
||||
"source": "brainstorm_clarification",
|
||||
"path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md",
|
||||
"priority": "highest",
|
||||
"contains": "role_specific_requirements_and_design"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "check_patterns",
|
||||
"action": "Analyze existing patterns",
|
||||
"command": "bash(rg 'auth' [focus_paths] | head -10)",
|
||||
"output_to": "patterns"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "analyze_architecture",
|
||||
"action": "Review system architecture",
|
||||
"command": "gemini \"analyze patterns: [patterns]\"",
|
||||
"output_to": "design"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "check_deps",
|
||||
"action": "Check dependencies",
|
||||
"command": "bash(echo [depends_on] | xargs cat)",
|
||||
"output_to": "context"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 1,
|
||||
"title": "Set up authentication infrastructure",
|
||||
"description": "Install JWT library and create auth config following [design] patterns from [parent]",
|
||||
"modification_points": [
|
||||
"Add JWT library dependencies to package.json",
|
||||
"Create auth configuration file using [parent] patterns"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"logic_flow": [
|
||||
"Install jsonwebtoken library via npm",
|
||||
"Configure JWT secret and expiration from [inherited]",
|
||||
"Export auth config for use by [jwt_generator]"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": [],
|
||||
"output": "auth_config"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 2,
|
||||
"title": "Implement JWT generation",
|
||||
"description": "Create JWT token generation logic using [auth_config] and [inherited] validation patterns",
|
||||
"modification_points": [
|
||||
"Add JWT generation function in auth service",
|
||||
"Implement token signing with [auth_config]"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"logic_flow": [
|
||||
"User login → validate credentials with [inherited]",
|
||||
"Generate JWT payload with user data",
|
||||
"Sign JWT using secret from [auth_config]",
|
||||
"Return signed token"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": [1],
|
||||
"output": "jwt_generator"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 3,
|
||||
"title": "Implement JWT validation middleware",
|
||||
"description": "Create middleware to validate JWT tokens using [auth_config] and [shared] rules",
|
||||
"modification_points": [
|
||||
"Create validation middleware using [jwt_generator]",
|
||||
"Add token verification using [shared] rules",
|
||||
"Implement user attachment to request object"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"logic_flow": [
|
||||
"Protected route → extract JWT from Authorization header",
|
||||
"Validate token signature using [auth_config]",
|
||||
"Check token expiration and [shared] rules",
|
||||
"Decode payload and attach user to request",
|
||||
"Call next() or return 401 error"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"command": "bash(npm test -- middleware.test.ts)",
|
||||
"depends_on": [1, 2],
|
||||
"output": "auth_middleware"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"target_files": [
|
||||
"src/auth/login.ts:handleLogin:75-120",
|
||||
"src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken",
|
||||
"src/auth/PasswordReset.ts"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Focus Paths & Context Management
|
||||
|
||||
#### Context Package Path (Top-Level Field)
|
||||
The **context_package_path** field provides the location of the smart context package:
|
||||
- **Location**: Top-level field (not in `artifacts` array)
|
||||
- **Path**: `.workflow/WFS-session/.process/context-package.json`
|
||||
- **Purpose**: References the comprehensive context package containing project structure, dependencies, and brainstorming artifacts catalog
|
||||
- **Usage**: Loaded in `pre_analysis` steps via `Read({{context_package_path}})`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Focus Paths Format
|
||||
The **focus_paths** field specifies concrete project paths for task implementation:
|
||||
- **Array of strings**: `["folder1", "folder2", "specific_file.ts"]`
|
||||
- **Concrete paths**: Use actual directory/file names without wildcards
|
||||
- **Mixed types**: Can include both directories and specific files
|
||||
- **Relative paths**: From project root (e.g., `src/auth`, not `./src/auth`)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Artifacts Field ⚠️ NEW FIELD
|
||||
Optional field referencing brainstorming outputs for task execution:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
"artifacts": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "role_analyses|topic_framework|individual_role_analysis",
|
||||
"source": "brainstorm_clarification|brainstorm_framework|brainstorm_roles",
|
||||
"path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/document.md",
|
||||
"priority": "highest|high|medium|low"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Types & Priority**: role_analyses (highest) → topic_framework (medium) → individual_role_analysis (low)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flow Control Configuration
|
||||
The **flow_control** field manages task execution through structured sequential steps. For complete format specifications and usage guidelines, see [Flow Control Format Guide](#flow-control-format-guide) below.
|
||||
|
||||
**Quick Reference**:
|
||||
- **pre_analysis**: Context gathering steps (supports multiple command types)
|
||||
- **implementation_approach**: Implementation steps array with dependency management
|
||||
- **target_files**: Target files for modification (file:function:lines format)
|
||||
- **Variable references**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference step outputs
|
||||
- **Tool integration**: Supports Gemini, Codex, Bash commands, and MCP tools
|
||||
|
||||
## Flow Control Format Guide
|
||||
|
||||
The `[FLOW_CONTROL]` marker indicates that a task or prompt contains flow control steps for sequential execution. There are **two distinct formats** used in different scenarios:
|
||||
|
||||
### Format Comparison Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | Inline Format | JSON Format |
|
||||
|--------|--------------|-------------|
|
||||
| **Used In** | Brainstorm workflows | Implementation tasks |
|
||||
| **Agent** | conceptual-planning-agent | code-developer, test-fix-agent, doc-generator |
|
||||
| **Location** | Task() prompt (markdown) | .task/IMPL-*.json file |
|
||||
| **Persistence** | Temporary (prompt-only) | Persistent (file storage) |
|
||||
| **Complexity** | Simple (3-5 steps) | Complex (10+ steps) |
|
||||
| **Dependencies** | None | Full `depends_on` support |
|
||||
| **Purpose** | Load brainstorming context | Implement task with preparation |
|
||||
|
||||
### Inline Format (Brainstorm)
|
||||
|
||||
**Marker**: `[FLOW_CONTROL]` written directly in Task() prompt
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**: Markdown list format
|
||||
|
||||
**Used By**: Brainstorm commands (`auto-parallel.md`, role commands)
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent**: `conceptual-planning-agent`
|
||||
|
||||
**Example**:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
[FLOW_CONTROL]
|
||||
|
||||
### Flow Control Steps
|
||||
**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these pre_analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **load_topic_framework**
|
||||
- Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
|
||||
- Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
|
||||
- Output: topic_framework
|
||||
|
||||
2. **load_role_template**
|
||||
- Action: Load role-specific planning template
|
||||
- Command: bash($(cat "~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
|
||||
- Output: role_template
|
||||
|
||||
3. **load_session_metadata**
|
||||
- Action: Load session metadata and topic description
|
||||
- Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')
|
||||
- Output: session_metadata
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics**:
|
||||
- 3-5 simple context loading steps
|
||||
- Written directly in prompt (not persistent)
|
||||
- No dependency management between steps
|
||||
- Used for temporary context preparation
|
||||
- Variables: `[variable_name]` for output references
|
||||
|
||||
### JSON Format (Implementation)
|
||||
|
||||
**Marker**: `[FLOW_CONTROL]` used in TodoWrite or documentation to indicate task has flow control
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**: Complete JSON structure in task file
|
||||
|
||||
**Used By**: Implementation tasks (IMPL-*.json)
|
||||
|
||||
**Agents**: `code-developer`, `test-fix-agent`, `doc-generator`
|
||||
|
||||
**Example**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "load_role_analyses",
|
||||
"action": "Load role analysis documents from brainstorming",
|
||||
"commands": [
|
||||
"bash(ls .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')",
|
||||
"Glob(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md)",
|
||||
"Read(each discovered role analysis file)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"output_to": "role_analyses",
|
||||
"on_error": "skip_optional"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "local_codebase_exploration",
|
||||
"action": "Explore codebase using local search",
|
||||
"commands": [
|
||||
"bash(rg '^(function|class|interface).*auth' --type ts -n --max-count 15)",
|
||||
"bash(find . -name '*auth*' -type f | grep -v node_modules | head -10)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"output_to": "codebase_structure"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 1,
|
||||
"title": "Setup infrastructure",
|
||||
"description": "Install JWT library and create config following [role_analyses]",
|
||||
"modification_points": [
|
||||
"Add JWT library dependencies to package.json",
|
||||
"Create auth configuration file"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"logic_flow": [
|
||||
"Install jsonwebtoken library via npm",
|
||||
"Configure JWT secret from [role_analyses]",
|
||||
"Export auth config for use by [jwt_generator]"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": [],
|
||||
"output": "auth_config"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 2,
|
||||
"title": "Implement JWT generation",
|
||||
"description": "Create JWT token generation logic using [auth_config]",
|
||||
"modification_points": [
|
||||
"Add JWT generation function in auth service",
|
||||
"Implement token signing with [auth_config]"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"logic_flow": [
|
||||
"User login → validate credentials",
|
||||
"Generate JWT payload with user data",
|
||||
"Sign JWT using secret from [auth_config]",
|
||||
"Return signed token"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": [1],
|
||||
"output": "jwt_generator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"target_files": [
|
||||
"src/auth/login.ts:handleLogin:75-120",
|
||||
"src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics**:
|
||||
- Persistent storage in .task/IMPL-*.json files
|
||||
- Complete dependency management (`depends_on` arrays)
|
||||
- Two-phase structure: `pre_analysis` + `implementation_approach`
|
||||
- Error handling strategies (`on_error` field)
|
||||
- Target file specifications
|
||||
- Variables: `[variable_name]` for cross-step references
|
||||
|
||||
### JSON Format Field Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
#### pre_analysis Field
|
||||
**Purpose**: Context gathering phase before implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**: Array of step objects with sequential execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Step Fields**:
|
||||
- **step**: Step identifier (string, e.g., "load_role_analyses")
|
||||
- **action**: Human-readable description of the step
|
||||
- **command** or **commands**: Single command string or array of command strings
|
||||
- **output_to**: Variable name for storing step output
|
||||
- **on_error**: Error handling strategy (`skip_optional`, `fail`, `retry_once`, `manual_intervention`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Types Supported**:
|
||||
- **Bash commands**: `bash(command)` - Any shell command
|
||||
- **Tool calls**: `Read(file)`, `Glob(pattern)`, `Grep(pattern)`
|
||||
- **MCP tools**: `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa()`, `mcp__exa__web_search_exa()`
|
||||
- **CLI commands**: `gemini`, `qwen`, `codex --full-auto exec`
|
||||
|
||||
**Example**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "load_context",
|
||||
"action": "Load project context and patterns",
|
||||
"commands": [
|
||||
"bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')",
|
||||
"Read(CLAUDE.md)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"output_to": "project_structure",
|
||||
"on_error": "skip_optional"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### implementation_approach Field
|
||||
**Purpose**: Define implementation steps with dependency management
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**: Array of step objects (NOT object format)
|
||||
|
||||
**Step Fields (All Required)**:
|
||||
- **step**: Unique step number (1, 2, 3, ...) - serves as step identifier
|
||||
- **title**: Brief step title
|
||||
- **description**: Comprehensive implementation description with context variable references
|
||||
- **modification_points**: Array of specific code modification targets
|
||||
- **logic_flow**: Array describing business logic execution sequence
|
||||
- **depends_on**: Array of step numbers this step depends on (e.g., `[1]`, `[1, 2]`) - empty array `[]` for independent steps
|
||||
- **output**: Output variable name that can be referenced by subsequent steps via `[output_name]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Optional Fields**:
|
||||
- **command**: Command for step execution (supports any shell command or CLI tool)
|
||||
- When omitted: Agent interprets modification_points and logic_flow to execute
|
||||
- When specified: Command executes the step directly
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Modes**:
|
||||
- **Default (without command)**: Agent executes based on modification_points and logic_flow
|
||||
- **With command**: Specified command handles execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Field Usage**:
|
||||
- **Default approach**: Omit command field - let agent execute autonomously
|
||||
- **CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen)**: Add ONLY when user explicitly requests CLI tool usage
|
||||
- **Simple commands**: Can include bash commands, test commands, validation scripts
|
||||
- **Complex workflows**: Use command for multi-step operations or tool coordination
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Format Examples** (only when explicitly needed):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
// Simple Bash
|
||||
"command": "bash(npm install package)"
|
||||
"command": "bash(npm test)"
|
||||
|
||||
// Validation
|
||||
"command": "bash(test -f config.ts && grep -q 'JWT_SECRET' config.ts)"
|
||||
|
||||
// Codex (user requested)
|
||||
"command": "codex -C path --full-auto exec \"task\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access"
|
||||
|
||||
// Codex Resume (user requested, maintains context)
|
||||
"command": "codex --full-auto exec \"task\" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access"
|
||||
|
||||
// Gemini (user requested)
|
||||
"command": "gemini \"analyze [context]\""
|
||||
|
||||
// Qwen (fallback for Gemini)
|
||||
"command": "qwen \"analyze [context]\""
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example Step**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 2,
|
||||
"title": "Implement JWT generation",
|
||||
"description": "Create JWT token generation logic using [auth_config]",
|
||||
"modification_points": [
|
||||
"Add JWT generation function in auth service",
|
||||
"Implement token signing with [auth_config]"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"logic_flow": [
|
||||
"User login → validate credentials",
|
||||
"Generate JWT payload with user data",
|
||||
"Sign JWT using secret from [auth_config]",
|
||||
"Return signed token"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": [1],
|
||||
"output": "jwt_generator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### target_files Field
|
||||
**Purpose**: Specify files to be modified or created
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: Array of strings
|
||||
- **Existing files**: `"file:function:lines"` (e.g., `"src/auth/login.ts:handleLogin:75-120"`)
|
||||
- **New files**: `"path/to/NewFile.ts"` (file path only)
|
||||
|
||||
### Tool Reference
|
||||
|
||||
**Available Command Types**:
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini CLI**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
gemini "prompt"
|
||||
gemini --approval-mode yolo "prompt" # For write mode
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen CLI** (Gemini fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
qwen "prompt"
|
||||
qwen --approval-mode yolo "prompt" # For write mode
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex CLI**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
codex -C directory --full-auto exec "task" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
codex --full-auto exec "task" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Built-in Tools**:
|
||||
- `Read(file_path)` - Read file contents
|
||||
- `Glob(pattern)` - Find files by pattern
|
||||
- `Grep(pattern)` - Search content with regex
|
||||
- `bash(command)` - Execute bash command
|
||||
|
||||
**MCP Tools**:
|
||||
- `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query="...")` - Get code context from Exa
|
||||
- `mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query="...")` - Web search via Exa
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Commands**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bash(rg 'pattern' src/)
|
||||
bash(find . -name "*.ts")
|
||||
bash(npm test)
|
||||
bash(git log --oneline | head -5)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Variable System & Context Flow
|
||||
|
||||
**Variable Reference Syntax**:
|
||||
Both formats use `[variable_name]` syntax for referencing outputs from previous steps.
|
||||
|
||||
**Variable Types**:
|
||||
- **Step outputs**: `[step_output_name]` - Reference any pre_analysis step output
|
||||
- **Task properties**: `[task_property]` - Reference any task context field
|
||||
- **Previous results**: `[analysis_result]` - Reference accumulated context
|
||||
- **Implementation outputs**: Reference outputs from previous implementation steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
// Reference pre_analysis output
|
||||
"description": "Install JWT library following [role_analyses]"
|
||||
|
||||
// Reference previous step output
|
||||
"description": "Create middleware using [auth_config] and [jwt_generator]"
|
||||
|
||||
// Reference task context
|
||||
"command": "bash(cd [focus_paths] && npm test)"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Accumulation Process**:
|
||||
1. **Structure Analysis**: `get_modules_by_depth.sh` → project hierarchy
|
||||
2. **Pattern Analysis**: Tool-specific commands → existing patterns
|
||||
3. **Dependency Mapping**: Previous task summaries → inheritance context
|
||||
4. **Task Context Generation**: Combined analysis → task.context fields
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Inheritance Rules**:
|
||||
- **Parent → Child**: Container tasks pass context via `context.inherited`
|
||||
- **Dependency → Dependent**: Previous task summaries via `context.depends_on`
|
||||
- **Session → Task**: Global session context included in all tasks
|
||||
- **Module → Feature**: Module patterns inform feature implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Processing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
**conceptual-planning-agent** (Inline Format):
|
||||
- Parses markdown list from prompt
|
||||
- Executes 3-5 simple loading steps
|
||||
- No dependency resolution needed
|
||||
- Accumulates context in variables
|
||||
- Used only in brainstorm workflows
|
||||
|
||||
**code-developer, test-fix-agent** (JSON Format):
|
||||
- Loads complete task JSON from file
|
||||
- Executes `pre_analysis` steps sequentially
|
||||
- Processes `implementation_approach` with dependency resolution
|
||||
- Handles complex variable substitution
|
||||
- Updates task status in JSON file
|
||||
|
||||
### Usage Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
**Use Inline Format When**:
|
||||
- Running brainstorm workflows
|
||||
- Need 3-5 simple context loading steps
|
||||
- No persistence required
|
||||
- No dependencies between steps
|
||||
- Temporary context preparation
|
||||
|
||||
**Use JSON Format When**:
|
||||
- Implementing features or tasks
|
||||
- Need 10+ complex execution steps
|
||||
- Require dependency management
|
||||
- Need persistent task definitions
|
||||
- Complex variable flow between steps
|
||||
- Error handling strategies needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Variable Reference Syntax
|
||||
|
||||
Both formats use `[variable_name]` syntax for referencing outputs:
|
||||
|
||||
**Inline Format**:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
2. **analyze_context**
|
||||
- Action: Analyze using [topic_framework] and [role_template]
|
||||
- Output: analysis_results
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**JSON Format**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 2,
|
||||
"description": "Implement following [role_analyses] and [codebase_structure]",
|
||||
"depends_on": [1],
|
||||
"output": "implementation"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Validation Rules
|
||||
1. **ID Uniqueness**: All task IDs must be unique
|
||||
2. **Hierarchical Format**: Must follow IMPL-N[.M] pattern (maximum 2 levels)
|
||||
3. **Parent References**: All parent IDs must exist as JSON files
|
||||
4. **Status Consistency**: Status values from defined enumeration
|
||||
5. **Required Fields**: All 5 core fields must be present (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control)
|
||||
6. **Focus Paths Structure**: context.focus_paths must contain concrete paths (no wildcards)
|
||||
7. **Flow Control Format**: pre_analysis must be array with required fields
|
||||
8. **Dependency Integrity**: All task-level depends_on references must exist as JSON files
|
||||
9. **Artifacts Structure**: context.artifacts (optional) must use valid type, priority, and path format
|
||||
10. **Implementation Steps Array**: implementation_approach must be array of step objects
|
||||
11. **Step Number Uniqueness**: All step numbers within a task must be unique and sequential (1, 2, 3, ...)
|
||||
12. **Step Dependencies**: All step-level depends_on numbers must reference valid steps within same task
|
||||
13. **Step Sequence**: Step numbers should match array order (first item step=1, second item step=2, etc.)
|
||||
14. **Step Required Fields**: Each step must have step, title, description, modification_points, logic_flow, depends_on, output
|
||||
15. **Step Optional Fields**: command field is optional - when omitted, agent executes based on modification_points and logic_flow
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Unified File Structure
|
||||
All workflows use the same file structure definition regardless of complexity. **Directories and files are created on-demand as needed**, not all at once during initialization.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Complete Structure Reference
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/
|
||||
├── [.scratchpad/] # Non-session-specific outputs (created when needed)
|
||||
│ ├── analyze-*-[timestamp].md # One-off analysis results
|
||||
│ ├── chat-*-[timestamp].md # Standalone chat sessions
|
||||
│ ├── plan-*-[timestamp].md # Ad-hoc planning notes
|
||||
│ ├── bug-index-*-[timestamp].md # Quick bug analyses
|
||||
│ ├── code-analysis-*-[timestamp].md # Standalone code analysis
|
||||
│ ├── execute-*-[timestamp].md # Ad-hoc implementation logs
|
||||
│ └── codex-execute-*-[timestamp].md # Multi-stage execution logs
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── [design-run-*/] # Standalone UI design outputs (created when needed)
|
||||
│ └── (timestamped)/ # Timestamped design runs without session
|
||||
│ ├── .intermediates/ # Intermediate analysis files
|
||||
│ │ ├── style-analysis/ # Style analysis data
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── computed-styles.json # Extracted CSS values
|
||||
│ │ │ └── design-space-analysis.json # Design directions
|
||||
│ │ └── layout-analysis/ # Layout analysis data
|
||||
│ │ ├── dom-structure-{target}.json # DOM extraction
|
||||
│ │ └── inspirations/ # Layout research
|
||||
│ │ └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt
|
||||
│ ├── style-extraction/ # Final design systems
|
||||
│ │ ├── style-1/ # design-tokens.json, style-guide.md
|
||||
│ │ └── style-N/
|
||||
│ ├── layout-extraction/ # Layout templates
|
||||
│ │ └── layout-templates.json
|
||||
│ ├── prototypes/ # Generated HTML/CSS prototypes
|
||||
│ │ ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html # Final prototypes
|
||||
│ │ ├── compare.html # Interactive matrix view
|
||||
│ │ └── index.html # Navigation page
|
||||
│ └── .run-metadata.json # Run configuration
|
||||
│
|
||||
├── active/ # Active workflow sessions
|
||||
│ └── WFS-[topic-slug]/
|
||||
│ ├── workflow-session.json # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
|
||||
│ ├── [.brainstorming/] # Optional brainstorming phase (created when needed)
|
||||
│ ├── [.chat/] # CLI interaction sessions (created when analysis is run)
|
||||
│ │ ├── chat-*.md # Saved chat sessions
|
||||
│ │ └── analysis-*.md # Analysis results
|
||||
│ ├── [.process/] # Planning analysis results (created by /workflow:plan)
|
||||
│ │ └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md # Analysis results and planning artifacts
|
||||
│ ├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Planning document (REQUIRED)
|
||||
│ ├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking (REQUIRED)
|
||||
│ ├── [.summaries/] # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
|
||||
│ │ ├── IMPL-*-summary.md # Main task summaries
|
||||
│ │ └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md # Subtask summaries
|
||||
│ ├── [.review/] # Code review results (created by review commands)
|
||||
│ │ ├── review-metadata.json # Review configuration and scope
|
||||
│ │ ├── review-state.json # Review state machine
|
||||
│ │ ├── review-progress.json # Real-time progress tracking
|
||||
│ │ ├── dimensions/ # Per-dimension analysis results
|
||||
│ │ ├── iterations/ # Deep-dive iteration results
|
||||
│ │ ├── reports/ # Human-readable reports and CLI outputs
|
||||
│ │ ├── REVIEW-SUMMARY.md # Final consolidated summary
|
||||
│ │ └── dashboard.html # Interactive review dashboard
|
||||
│ ├── [design-*/] # UI design outputs (created by ui-design workflows)
|
||||
│ │ ├── .intermediates/ # Intermediate analysis files
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── style-analysis/ # Style analysis data
|
||||
│ │ │ │ ├── computed-styles.json # Extracted CSS values
|
||||
│ │ │ │ └── design-space-analysis.json # Design directions
|
||||
│ │ │ └── layout-analysis/ # Layout analysis data
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── dom-structure-{target}.json # DOM extraction
|
||||
│ │ │ └── inspirations/ # Layout research
|
||||
│ │ │ └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt
|
||||
│ │ ├── style-extraction/ # Final design systems
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── style-1/ # design-tokens.json, style-guide.md
|
||||
│ │ │ └── style-N/
|
||||
│ │ ├── layout-extraction/ # Layout templates
|
||||
│ │ │ └── layout-templates.json
|
||||
│ │ ├── prototypes/ # Generated HTML/CSS prototypes
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html # Final prototypes
|
||||
│ │ │ ├── compare.html # Interactive matrix view
|
||||
│ │ │ └── index.html # Navigation page
|
||||
│ │ └── .run-metadata.json # Run configuration
|
||||
│ └── .task/ # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
|
||||
│ ├── IMPL-*.json # Main task definitions
|
||||
│ └── IMPL-*.*.json # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
|
||||
└── archives/ # Completed workflow sessions
|
||||
└── WFS-[completed-topic]/ # Archived session directories
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Creation Strategy
|
||||
- **Initial Setup**: Create only `workflow-session.json`, `IMPL_PLAN.md`, `TODO_LIST.md`, and `.task/` directory
|
||||
- **On-Demand Creation**: Other directories created when first needed
|
||||
- **Dynamic Files**: Subtask JSON files created during task decomposition
|
||||
- **Scratchpad Usage**: `.scratchpad/` created when CLI commands run without active session
|
||||
- **Design Usage**: `design-{timestamp}/` created by UI design workflows in `.workflow/` directly for standalone design runs
|
||||
- **Review Usage**: `.review/` created by review commands (`/workflow:review-module-cycle`, `/workflow:review-session-cycle`) for comprehensive code quality analysis
|
||||
- **Intermediate Files**: `.intermediates/` contains analysis data (style/layout) separate from final deliverables
|
||||
- **Layout Templates**: `layout-extraction/layout-templates.json` contains structural templates for UI assembly
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scratchpad Directory (.scratchpad/)
|
||||
**Purpose**: Centralized location for non-session-specific CLI outputs
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Use**:
|
||||
1. **No Active Session**: CLI analysis/chat commands run without an active workflow session
|
||||
2. **Unrelated Analysis**: Quick analysis not related to current active session
|
||||
3. **Exploratory Work**: Ad-hoc investigation before creating formal workflow
|
||||
4. **One-Off Queries**: Standalone questions or debugging without workflow context
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Routing Logic**:
|
||||
- **IF** active session exists in `.workflow/active/` AND command is session-relevant:
|
||||
- Save to `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/[command]-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
- **ELSE** (no session OR one-off analysis):
|
||||
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/[command]-[description]-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
|
||||
**File Naming Pattern**: `[command-type]-[brief-description]-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
|
||||
*Workflow Commands (lightweight):*
|
||||
- `/workflow:lite-plan "feature idea"` (exploratory) → `.scratchpad/lite-plan-feature-idea-20250105-143110.md`
|
||||
- `/workflow:lite-fix "bug description"` (bug fixing) → `.scratchpad/lite-fix-bug-20250105-143130.md`
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note**: Direct CLI commands (`/cli:analyze`, `/cli:execute`, etc.) have been replaced by semantic invocation and workflow commands.
|
||||
|
||||
**Maintenance**:
|
||||
- Periodically review and clean up old scratchpad files
|
||||
- Promote useful analyses to formal workflow sessions if needed
|
||||
- No automatic cleanup - manual management recommended
|
||||
|
||||
### File Naming Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
#### Session Identifiers
|
||||
**Format**: `WFS-[topic-slug]`
|
||||
|
||||
**WFS Prefix Meaning**:
|
||||
- `WFS` = **W**ork**F**low **S**ession
|
||||
- Identifies directories as workflow session containers
|
||||
- Distinguishes workflow sessions from other project directories
|
||||
|
||||
**Naming Rules**:
|
||||
- Convert topic to lowercase with hyphens (e.g., "User Auth System" → `WFS-user-auth-system`)
|
||||
- Add `-NNN` suffix only if conflicts exist (e.g., `WFS-payment-integration-002`)
|
||||
- Maximum length: 50 characters including WFS- prefix
|
||||
|
||||
#### Document Naming
|
||||
- `workflow-session.json` - Session state (required)
|
||||
- `IMPL_PLAN.md` - Planning document (required)
|
||||
- `TODO_LIST.md` - Progress tracking (auto-generated when needed)
|
||||
- Chat sessions: `chat-analysis-*.md`
|
||||
- Task summaries: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Document Templates
|
||||
|
||||
#### TODO_LIST.md Template
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Tasks: [Session Topic]
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Progress
|
||||
▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
|
||||
- [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
|
||||
- [x] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-001.2-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-002-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Status Legend
|
||||
- `▸` = Container task (has subtasks)
|
||||
- `- [ ]` = Pending leaf task
|
||||
- `- [x]` = Completed leaf task
|
||||
- Maximum 2 levels: Main tasks and subtasks only
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Operations Guide
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Management
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create minimal required structure
|
||||
mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-topic-slug/.task
|
||||
echo '{"session_id":"WFS-topic-slug",...}' > .workflow/active/WFS-topic-slug/workflow-session.json
|
||||
echo '# Implementation Plan' > .workflow/active/WFS-topic-slug/IMPL_PLAN.md
|
||||
echo '# Tasks' > .workflow/active/WFS-topic-slug/TODO_LIST.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Operations
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create task
|
||||
echo '{"id":"IMPL-1","title":"New task",...}' > .task/IMPL-1.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Update task status
|
||||
jq '.status = "active"' .task/IMPL-1.json > temp && mv temp .task/IMPL-1.json
|
||||
|
||||
# Generate TODO list from JSON state
|
||||
generate_todo_list_from_json .task/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Directory Creation (On-Demand)
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir -p .brainstorming # When brainstorming is initiated
|
||||
mkdir -p .chat # When analysis commands are run
|
||||
mkdir -p .summaries # When first task completes
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Consistency Checks & Recovery
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Validate session directory structure
|
||||
if [ -d ".workflow/active/" ]; then
|
||||
for session_dir in .workflow/active/WFS-*; do
|
||||
if [ ! -f "$session_dir/workflow-session.json" ]; then
|
||||
echo "⚠️ Missing workflow-session.json in $session_dir"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
fi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Recovery Strategies**:
|
||||
- **Missing Session File**: Recreate workflow-session.json from template
|
||||
- **Corrupted Session File**: Restore from template with basic metadata
|
||||
- **Broken Task Hierarchy**: Reconstruct parent-child relationships from task JSON files
|
||||
- **Orphaned Sessions**: Move incomplete sessions to archives/
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity Classification
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Complexity Rules
|
||||
**Complexity is determined by task count and decomposition needs:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Complexity | Task Count | Hierarchy Depth | Decomposition Behavior |
|
||||
|------------|------------|----------------|----------------------|
|
||||
| **Simple** | <5 tasks | 1 level (IMPL-N) | Direct execution, minimal decomposition |
|
||||
| **Medium** | 5-15 tasks | 2 levels (IMPL-N.M) | Moderate decomposition, context coordination |
|
||||
| **Complex** | >15 tasks | 2 levels (IMPL-N.M) | Frequent decomposition, multi-agent orchestration |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow Characteristics & Tool Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
#### Simple Workflows
|
||||
- **Examples**: Bug fixes, small feature additions, configuration changes
|
||||
- **Task Decomposition**: Usually single-level tasks, minimal breakdown needed
|
||||
- **Agent Coordination**: Direct execution without complex orchestration
|
||||
- **Tool Strategy**: `bash()` commands, `grep()` for pattern matching
|
||||
|
||||
#### Medium Workflows
|
||||
- **Examples**: New features, API endpoints with integration, database schema changes
|
||||
- **Task Decomposition**: Two-level hierarchy when decomposition is needed
|
||||
- **Agent Coordination**: Context coordination between related tasks
|
||||
- **Tool Strategy**: `gemini` for pattern analysis, `codex --full-auto` for implementation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Complex Workflows
|
||||
- **Examples**: Major features, architecture refactoring, security implementations, multi-service deployments
|
||||
- **Task Decomposition**: Frequent use of two-level hierarchy with dynamic subtask creation
|
||||
- **Agent Coordination**: Multi-agent orchestration with deep context analysis
|
||||
- **Tool Strategy**: `gemini` for architecture analysis, `codex --full-auto` for complex problem solving, `bash()` commands for flexible analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Assessment & Upgrades
|
||||
- **During Creation**: System evaluates requirements and assigns complexity
|
||||
- **During Execution**: Can upgrade (Simple→Medium→Complex) but never downgrade
|
||||
- **Override Allowed**: Users can specify higher complexity manually
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Assignment
|
||||
Based on task type and title keywords:
|
||||
- **Planning tasks** → @action-planning-agent
|
||||
- **Implementation** → @code-developer (code + tests)
|
||||
- **Test execution/fixing** → @test-fix-agent
|
||||
- **Review** → @universal-executor (optional, only when explicitly requested)
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Context
|
||||
Agents receive complete task JSON plus workflow context:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"task": { /* complete task JSON */ },
|
||||
"workflow": {
|
||||
"session": "WFS-user-auth",
|
||||
"phase": "IMPLEMENT"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Claude Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
- **Coding Philosophy**: @~/.ccw/workflows/coding-philosophy.md
|
||||
|
||||
## CLI Endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
- **CLI Tools Usage**: @~/.ccw/workflows/cli-tools-usage.md
|
||||
- **CLI Endpoints Config**: @~/.claude/cli-tools.json
|
||||
|
||||
**Strictly follow the cli-tools.json configuration**
|
||||
|
||||
Available CLI endpoints are dynamically defined by the config file
|
||||
## Tool Execution
|
||||
|
||||
- **Context Requirements**: @~/.ccw/workflows/context-tools.md
|
||||
- **File Modification**: @~/.ccw/workflows/file-modification.md
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Calls
|
||||
- **Always use `run_in_background: false`** for Task tool agent calls: `Task({ subagent_type: "xxx", prompt: "...", run_in_background: false })` to ensure synchronous execution and immediate result visibility
|
||||
- **TaskOutput usage**: Only use `TaskOutput({ task_id: "xxx", block: false })` + sleep loop to poll completion status. NEVER read intermediate output during agent/CLI execution - wait for final result only
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Tool Calls (ccw cli)
|
||||
- **Default: Use Bash `run_in_background: true`** - Unless otherwise specified, always execute CLI calls in background using Bash tool's background mode:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({
|
||||
command: "ccw cli -p '...' --tool gemini",
|
||||
run_in_background: true // Bash tool parameter, not ccw cli parameter
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
- **After CLI call**: Stop output immediately - let CLI execute in background. **DO NOT use TaskOutput polling** - wait for hook callback to receive results
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Analysis Calls
|
||||
- **Wait for results**: MUST wait for CLI analysis to complete before taking any write action. Do NOT proceed with fixes while analysis is running
|
||||
- **Value every call**: Each CLI invocation is valuable and costly. NEVER waste analysis results:
|
||||
- Aggregate multiple analysis results before proposing solutions
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Auto-Invoke Triggers
|
||||
- **Reference**: See `cli-tools-usage.md` → [Auto-Invoke Triggers](#auto-invoke-triggers) for full specification
|
||||
- **Key scenarios**: Self-repair fails, ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions, pattern uncertainty, critical code paths
|
||||
- **Principles**: Default `--mode analysis`, no confirmation needed, wait for completion, flexible rule selection
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
- **Prefer `mcp__ide__getDiagnostics`** for code error checking over shell-based TypeScript compilation
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,391 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: cli-discuss-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Multi-CLI collaborative discussion agent with cross-verification and solution synthesis.
|
||||
Orchestrates 5-phase workflow: Context Prep → CLI Execution → Cross-Verify → Synthesize → Output
|
||||
color: magenta
|
||||
allowed-tools: mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), Grep(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are a specialized CLI discussion agent that orchestrates multiple CLI tools to analyze tasks, cross-verify findings, and synthesize structured solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Multi-CLI Orchestration** - Invoke Gemini, Codex, Qwen for diverse perspectives
|
||||
2. **Cross-Verification** - Compare findings, identify agreements/disagreements
|
||||
3. **Solution Synthesis** - Merge approaches, score and rank by consensus
|
||||
4. **Context Enrichment** - ACE semantic search for supplementary context
|
||||
|
||||
**Discussion Modes**:
|
||||
- `initial` → First round, establish baseline analysis (parallel execution)
|
||||
- `iterative` → Build on previous rounds with user feedback (parallel + resume)
|
||||
- `verification` → Cross-verify specific approaches (serial execution)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Execution Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Context Preparation
|
||||
↓ Parse input, enrich with ACE if needed, create round folder
|
||||
Phase 2: Multi-CLI Execution
|
||||
↓ Build prompts, execute CLIs with fallback chain, parse outputs
|
||||
Phase 3: Cross-Verification
|
||||
↓ Compare findings, identify agreements/disagreements, resolve conflicts
|
||||
Phase 4: Solution Synthesis
|
||||
↓ Extract approaches, merge similar, score and rank top 3
|
||||
Phase 5: Output Generation
|
||||
↓ Calculate convergence, generate questions, write synthesis.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Schema
|
||||
|
||||
**From orchestrator** (may be JSON strings):
|
||||
- `task_description` - User's task or requirement
|
||||
- `round_number` - Current discussion round (1, 2, 3...)
|
||||
- `session` - `{ id, folder }` for output paths
|
||||
- `ace_context` - `{ relevant_files[], detected_patterns[], architecture_insights }`
|
||||
- `previous_rounds` - Array of prior SynthesisResult (optional)
|
||||
- `user_feedback` - User's feedback from last round (optional)
|
||||
- `cli_config` - `{ tools[], timeout, fallback_chain[], mode }` (optional)
|
||||
- `tools`: Default `['gemini', 'codex']` or `['gemini', 'codex', 'claude']`
|
||||
- `fallback_chain`: Default `['gemini', 'codex', 'claude']`
|
||||
- `mode`: `'parallel'` (default) or `'serial'`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Schema
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Path**: `{session.folder}/rounds/{round_number}/synthesis.json`
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"round": 1,
|
||||
"solutions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Solution Name",
|
||||
"source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"],
|
||||
"feasibility": 0.85,
|
||||
"effort": "low|medium|high",
|
||||
"risk": "low|medium|high",
|
||||
"summary": "Brief analysis summary",
|
||||
"implementation_plan": {
|
||||
"approach": "High-level technical approach",
|
||||
"tasks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "T1",
|
||||
"name": "Task name",
|
||||
"depends_on": [],
|
||||
"files": [{"file": "path", "line": 10, "action": "modify|create|delete"}],
|
||||
"key_point": "Critical consideration for this task"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "T2",
|
||||
"name": "Second task",
|
||||
"depends_on": ["T1"],
|
||||
"files": [{"file": "path2", "line": 1, "action": "create"}],
|
||||
"key_point": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"execution_flow": "T1 → T2 → T3 (T2,T3 can parallel after T1)",
|
||||
"milestones": ["Interface defined", "Core logic complete", "Tests passing"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependencies": {
|
||||
"internal": ["@/lib/module"],
|
||||
"external": ["npm:package@version"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"technical_concerns": ["Potential blocker 1", "Risk area 2"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"convergence": {
|
||||
"score": 0.75,
|
||||
"new_insights": true,
|
||||
"recommendation": "converged|continue|user_input_needed"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cross_verification": {
|
||||
"agreements": ["point 1"],
|
||||
"disagreements": ["point 2"],
|
||||
"resolution": "how resolved"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"clarification_questions": ["question 1?"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Schema Fields**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Purpose |
|
||||
|-------|---------|
|
||||
| `feasibility` | Quantitative viability score (0-1) |
|
||||
| `summary` | Narrative analysis summary |
|
||||
| `implementation_plan.approach` | High-level technical strategy |
|
||||
| `implementation_plan.tasks[]` | Discrete implementation tasks |
|
||||
| `implementation_plan.tasks[].depends_on` | Task dependencies (IDs) |
|
||||
| `implementation_plan.tasks[].key_point` | Critical consideration for task |
|
||||
| `implementation_plan.execution_flow` | Visual task sequence |
|
||||
| `implementation_plan.milestones` | Key checkpoints |
|
||||
| `technical_concerns` | Specific risks/blockers |
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: Solutions ranked by internal scoring (array order = priority). `pros/cons` merged into `summary` and `technical_concerns`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Context Preparation
|
||||
|
||||
**Parse input** (handle JSON strings from orchestrator):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const ace_context = typeof input.ace_context === 'string'
|
||||
? JSON.parse(input.ace_context) : input.ace_context || {}
|
||||
const previous_rounds = typeof input.previous_rounds === 'string'
|
||||
? JSON.parse(input.previous_rounds) : input.previous_rounds || []
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**ACE Supplementary Search** (when needed):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Trigger conditions:
|
||||
// - Round > 1 AND relevant_files < 5
|
||||
// - Previous solutions reference unlisted files
|
||||
if (shouldSupplement) {
|
||||
mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
|
||||
project_root_path: process.cwd(),
|
||||
query: `Implementation patterns for ${task_keywords}`
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Create round folder**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir -p {session.folder}/rounds/{round_number}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Multi-CLI Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### Available CLI Tools
|
||||
|
||||
三方 CLI 工具:
|
||||
- **gemini** - Google Gemini (deep code analysis perspective)
|
||||
- **codex** - OpenAI Codex (implementation verification perspective)
|
||||
- **claude** - Anthropic Claude (architectural analysis perspective)
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Modes
|
||||
|
||||
**Parallel Mode** (default, faster):
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─ gemini ─┐
|
||||
│ ├─→ merge results → cross-verify
|
||||
└─ codex ──┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Execute multiple CLIs simultaneously
|
||||
- Merge outputs after all complete
|
||||
- Use when: time-sensitive, independent analysis needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Serial Mode** (for cross-verification):
|
||||
```
|
||||
gemini → (output) → codex → (verify) → claude
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Each CLI receives prior CLI's output
|
||||
- Explicit verification chain
|
||||
- Use when: deep verification required, controversial solutions
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode Selection**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const execution_mode = cli_config.mode || 'parallel'
|
||||
// parallel: Promise.all([cli1, cli2, cli3])
|
||||
// serial: await cli1 → await cli2(cli1.output) → await cli3(cli2.output)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Prompt Template
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze task from {perspective} perspective, verify technical feasibility
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Analyze: \"{task_description}\"
|
||||
• Examine codebase patterns and architecture
|
||||
• Identify implementation approaches with trade-offs
|
||||
• Provide file:line references for integration points
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: {ace_context_summary}
|
||||
{previous_rounds_section}
|
||||
{cross_verify_section}
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON with feasibility_score, findings, implementation_approaches, technical_concerns, code_locations
|
||||
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS:
|
||||
- Specific file:line references
|
||||
- Quantify effort estimates
|
||||
- Concrete pros/cons
|
||||
" --tool {tool} --mode analysis {resume_flag}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Resume Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Resume** - Continue from previous CLI session:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Resume last session
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Continue analysis..." --tool gemini --resume
|
||||
|
||||
# Resume specific session
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Verify findings..." --tool codex --resume <session-id>
|
||||
|
||||
# Merge multiple sessions
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Synthesize all..." --tool claude --resume <id1>,<id2>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Resume**:
|
||||
- Round > 1: Resume previous round's CLI session for context
|
||||
- Cross-verification: Resume primary CLI session for secondary to verify
|
||||
- User feedback: Resume with new constraints from user input
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Assembly** (automatic):
|
||||
```
|
||||
=== PREVIOUS CONVERSATION ===
|
||||
USER PROMPT: [Previous CLI prompt]
|
||||
ASSISTANT RESPONSE: [Previous CLI output]
|
||||
=== CONTINUATION ===
|
||||
[New prompt with updated context]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Fallback Chain
|
||||
|
||||
Execute primary tool → On failure, try next in chain:
|
||||
```
|
||||
gemini → codex → claude → degraded-analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-Verification Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Second+ CLI receives prior analysis for verification:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cross_verification": {
|
||||
"agrees_with": ["verified point 1"],
|
||||
"disagrees_with": ["challenged point 1"],
|
||||
"additions": ["new insight 1"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Cross-Verification
|
||||
|
||||
**Compare CLI outputs**:
|
||||
1. Group similar findings across CLIs
|
||||
2. Identify multi-CLI agreements (2+ CLIs agree)
|
||||
3. Identify disagreements (conflicting conclusions)
|
||||
4. Generate resolution based on evidence weight
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"agreements": ["Approach X proposed by gemini, codex"],
|
||||
"disagreements": ["Effort estimate differs: gemini=low, codex=high"],
|
||||
"resolution": "Resolved using code evidence from gemini"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Solution Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract and merge approaches**:
|
||||
1. Collect implementation_approaches from all CLIs
|
||||
2. Normalize names, merge similar approaches
|
||||
3. Combine pros/cons/affected_files from multiple sources
|
||||
4. Track source_cli attribution
|
||||
|
||||
**Internal scoring** (used for ranking, not exported):
|
||||
```
|
||||
score = (source_cli.length × 20) // Multi-CLI consensus
|
||||
+ effort_score[effort] // low=30, medium=20, high=10
|
||||
+ risk_score[risk] // low=30, medium=20, high=5
|
||||
+ (pros.length - cons.length) × 5 // Balance
|
||||
+ min(affected_files.length × 3, 15) // Specificity
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Top 3 solutions, ranked in array order (highest score first)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Output Generation
|
||||
|
||||
### Convergence Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
score = agreement_ratio × 0.5 // agreements / (agreements + disagreements)
|
||||
+ avg_feasibility × 0.3 // average of CLI feasibility_scores
|
||||
+ stability_bonus × 0.2 // +0.2 if no new insights vs previous rounds
|
||||
|
||||
recommendation:
|
||||
- score >= 0.8 → "converged"
|
||||
- disagreements > 3 → "user_input_needed"
|
||||
- else → "continue"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Clarification Questions
|
||||
|
||||
Generate from:
|
||||
1. Unresolved disagreements (max 2)
|
||||
2. Technical concerns raised (max 2)
|
||||
3. Trade-off decisions needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Max 4 questions total**
|
||||
|
||||
### Write Output
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Write({
|
||||
file_path: `${session.folder}/rounds/${round_number}/synthesis.json`,
|
||||
content: JSON.stringify(artifact, null, 2)
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI Failure**: Try fallback chain → Degraded analysis if all fail
|
||||
|
||||
**Parse Failure**: Extract bullet points from raw output as fallback
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeout**: Return partial results with timeout flag
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Standards
|
||||
|
||||
| Criteria | Good | Bad |
|
||||
|----------|------|-----|
|
||||
| File references | `src/auth/login.ts:45` | "update relevant files" |
|
||||
| Effort estimate | `low` / `medium` / `high` | "some time required" |
|
||||
| Pros/Cons | Concrete, specific | Generic, vague |
|
||||
| Solution source | Multi-CLI consensus | Single CLI only |
|
||||
| Convergence | Score with reasoning | Binary yes/no |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
2. Execute multiple CLIs for cross-verification
|
||||
2. Parse CLI outputs with fallback extraction
|
||||
3. Include file:line references in affected_files
|
||||
4. Calculate convergence score accurately
|
||||
5. Write synthesis.json to round folder
|
||||
6. Use `run_in_background: false` for CLI calls
|
||||
7. Limit solutions to top 3
|
||||
8. Limit clarification questions to 4
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
1. Execute implementation code (analysis only)
|
||||
2. Return without writing synthesis.json
|
||||
3. Skip cross-verification phase
|
||||
4. Generate more than 4 clarification questions
|
||||
5. Ignore previous round context
|
||||
6. Assume solution without multi-CLI validation
|
||||
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ You are an intelligent CLI execution specialist that autonomously orchestrates c
|
||||
2. **Qwen (Fallback)** - Same capabilities as Gemini, use when unavailable
|
||||
3. **Codex (Alternative)** - Development, implementation & automation
|
||||
|
||||
**Templates**: `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
|
||||
**Templates**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
|
||||
- `analysis/` - pattern.txt, architecture.txt, code-execution-tracing.txt, security.txt, quality.txt
|
||||
- `development/` - feature.txt, refactor.txt, testing.txt, bug-diagnosis.txt
|
||||
- `planning/` - task-breakdown.txt, architecture-planning.txt
|
||||
- `memory/` - claude-module-unified.txt
|
||||
|
||||
**Reference**: See `~/.ccw/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md` for complete usage guide
|
||||
**Reference**: See `~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md` for complete usage guide
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Execution Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,38 +61,13 @@ Score = 0
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract Keywords**: domains (auth, api, database, ui), technologies (react, typescript, node), actions (implement, refactor, test)
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Context Loading** (when executing from plan.json):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Load task-specific context from plan fields
|
||||
const task = plan.tasks.find(t => t.id === taskId)
|
||||
const context = {
|
||||
// Base context
|
||||
scope: task.scope,
|
||||
modification_points: task.modification_points,
|
||||
implementation: task.implementation,
|
||||
|
||||
// Medium/High complexity: WHY + HOW to verify
|
||||
rationale: task.rationale?.chosen_approach, // Why this approach
|
||||
verification: task.verification?.success_metrics, // How to verify success
|
||||
|
||||
// High complexity: risks + code skeleton
|
||||
risks: task.risks?.map(r => r.mitigation), // Risk mitigations to follow
|
||||
code_skeleton: task.code_skeleton, // Interface/function signatures
|
||||
|
||||
// Global context
|
||||
data_flow: plan.data_flow?.diagram // Data flow overview
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Context Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Project Structure**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
|
||||
~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Content Search**:
|
||||
@@ -125,11 +100,11 @@ CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
# Specific patterns
|
||||
CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md @src/**/* @*.ts
|
||||
|
||||
# Cross-directory (requires --includeDirs)
|
||||
# Cross-directory (requires --include-directories)
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/* @../types/**/*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Template Selection** (`~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`):
|
||||
**2. Template Selection** (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`):
|
||||
```
|
||||
analyze → analysis/code-execution-tracing.txt | analysis/pattern.txt
|
||||
execute → development/feature.txt
|
||||
@@ -137,10 +112,9 @@ plan → planning/architecture-planning.txt | planning/task-breakdown.txt
|
||||
bug-fix → development/bug-diagnosis.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. CONSTRAINTS Field**:
|
||||
- Use `--rule <template>` option to auto-load protocol + template (appended to prompt)
|
||||
- Template names: `category-function` format (e.g., `analysis-code-patterns`, `development-feature`)
|
||||
- NEVER escape: `\"`, `\'` breaks shell parsing
|
||||
**3. RULES Field**:
|
||||
- Use `$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{path}.txt)` directly
|
||||
- NEVER escape: `\$`, `\"`, `\'` breaks command substitution
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Structured Prompt**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@@ -149,31 +123,7 @@ TASK: {specific_task_with_details}
|
||||
MODE: {analysis|write|auto}
|
||||
CONTEXT: {structured_file_references}
|
||||
EXPECTED: {clear_output_expectations}
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: {constraints}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**5. Plan-Aware Prompt Enhancement** (when executing from plan.json):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Include rationale in PURPOSE (Medium/High)
|
||||
PURPOSE: {task.description}
|
||||
Approach: {task.rationale.chosen_approach}
|
||||
Decision factors: {task.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
# Include code skeleton in TASK (High)
|
||||
TASK: {task.implementation.join('\n')}
|
||||
Key interfaces: {task.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => i.signature)}
|
||||
Key functions: {task.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => f.signature)}
|
||||
|
||||
# Include verification in EXPECTED
|
||||
EXPECTED: {task.acceptance.join(', ')}
|
||||
Success metrics: {task.verification.success_metrics.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
# Include risk mitigations in CONSTRAINTS (High)
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: {constraints}
|
||||
Risk mitigations: {task.risks.map(r => r.mitigation).join('; ')}
|
||||
|
||||
# Include data flow context (High)
|
||||
Memory: Data flow: {plan.data_flow.diagram}
|
||||
RULES: $(cat {selected_template}) | {constraints}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -184,7 +134,7 @@ Memory: Data flow: {plan.data_flow.diagram}
|
||||
```
|
||||
analyze|plan → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=analysis
|
||||
execute (simple|medium) → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=write
|
||||
execute (complex) → codex + mode=write
|
||||
execute (complex) → codex + mode=auto
|
||||
discuss → multi (gemini + codex parallel)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -194,45 +144,46 @@ discuss → multi (gemini + codex parallel)
|
||||
- Codex: `gpt-5` (default), `gpt5-codex` (large context)
|
||||
- **Position**: `-m` after prompt, before flags
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Templates (CCW Unified CLI)
|
||||
### Command Templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini/Qwen (Analysis)**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
cd {dir} && gemini -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: {goal}
|
||||
TASK: {task}
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED: {output}
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: {constraints}
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-code-patterns --cd {dir}
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt)
|
||||
" -m gemini-2.5-pro
|
||||
|
||||
# Qwen fallback: Replace '--tool gemini' with '--tool qwen'
|
||||
# Qwen fallback: Replace 'gemini' with 'qwen'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini/Qwen (Write)**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode write --cd {dir}
|
||||
cd {dir} && gemini -p "..." --approval-mode yolo
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex (Write)**:
|
||||
**Codex (Auto)**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd {dir}
|
||||
codex -C {dir} --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
|
||||
# Resume: Add 'resume --last' after prompt
|
||||
codex --full-auto exec "..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Directory** (Gemini/Qwen):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared
|
||||
cd src/auth && gemini -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --include-directories ../shared
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Directory Scope**:
|
||||
- `@` only references current directory + subdirectories
|
||||
- External dirs: MUST use `--includeDirs` + explicit CONTEXT reference
|
||||
- External dirs: MUST use `--include-directories` + explicit CONTEXT reference
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeout**: Simple 20min | Medium 40min | Complex 60min (Codex ×1.5)
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**: Use `run_in_background=false` for all CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Output Routing
|
||||
@@ -252,25 +203,11 @@ find .workflow/active/ -name 'WFS-*' -type d
|
||||
**Timestamp**: {iso_timestamp} | **Session**: {session_id} | **Task**: {task_id}
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Intent {intent} | Complexity {complexity} | Keywords {keywords}
|
||||
[Medium/High] Rationale: {task.rationale.chosen_approach}
|
||||
[High] Risks: {task.risks.map(r => `${r.description} → ${r.mitigation}`).join('; ')}
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Files ({N}) | Patterns {patterns} | Dependencies {deps}
|
||||
[High] Data Flow: {plan.data_flow.diagram}
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Enhanced Prompt
|
||||
{full_prompt}
|
||||
[High] Code Skeleton:
|
||||
- Interfaces: {task.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => i.name).join(', ')}
|
||||
- Functions: {task.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => f.signature).join('; ')}
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Tool {tool} | Command {cmd} | Result {status} | Duration {time}
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Log {path} | Summary {summary_path}
|
||||
[Medium/High] Verification Checklist:
|
||||
- Unit Tests: {task.verification.unit_tests.join(', ')}
|
||||
- Success Metrics: {task.verification.success_metrics.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps: {actions}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -308,7 +245,7 @@ Codex unavailable → Gemini/Qwen write mode
|
||||
|
||||
## Templates Reference
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
|
||||
**Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis** (`analysis/`):
|
||||
- `pattern.txt` - Code pattern analysis
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,186 +1,620 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: cli-explore-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Read-only code exploration agent with dual-source analysis strategy (Bash + Gemini CLI).
|
||||
Orchestrates 4-phase workflow: Task Understanding → Analysis Execution → Schema Validation → Output Generation
|
||||
Read-only code exploration and structural analysis agent specialized in module discovery, dependency mapping, and architecture comprehension using dual-source strategy (Bash rapid scan + Gemini CLI semantic analysis).
|
||||
|
||||
Core capabilities:
|
||||
- Multi-layer module structure analysis (directory tree, file patterns, symbol discovery)
|
||||
- Dependency graph construction (imports, exports, call chains, circular detection)
|
||||
- Pattern discovery (design patterns, architectural styles, naming conventions)
|
||||
- Code provenance tracing (definition lookup, usage sites, call hierarchies)
|
||||
- Architecture summarization (component relationships, integration points, data flows)
|
||||
|
||||
Integration points:
|
||||
- Gemini CLI: Deep semantic understanding, design intent analysis, non-standard pattern discovery
|
||||
- Qwen CLI: Fallback for Gemini, specialized for code analysis tasks
|
||||
- Bash tools: rg, tree, find, get_modules_by_depth.sh for rapid structural scanning
|
||||
- MCP Code Index: Optional integration for enhanced file discovery and search
|
||||
|
||||
Key optimizations:
|
||||
- Dual-source strategy: Bash structural scan (speed) + Gemini semantic analysis (depth)
|
||||
- Language-agnostic analysis with syntax-aware extensions
|
||||
- Progressive disclosure: Quick overview → detailed analysis → dependency deep-dive
|
||||
- Context-aware filtering based on task requirements
|
||||
|
||||
color: yellow
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are a specialized CLI exploration agent that autonomously analyzes codebases and generates structured outputs.
|
||||
You are a specialized **CLI Exploration Agent** that executes read-only code analysis tasks autonomously to discover module structures, map dependencies, and understand architectural patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Capabilities
|
||||
## Agent Operation
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Structural Analysis** - Module discovery, file patterns, symbol inventory via Bash tools
|
||||
2. **Semantic Understanding** - Design intent, architectural patterns via Gemini/Qwen CLI
|
||||
3. **Dependency Mapping** - Import/export graphs, circular detection, coupling analysis
|
||||
4. **Structured Output** - Schema-compliant JSON generation with validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Modes**:
|
||||
- `quick-scan` → Bash only (10-30s)
|
||||
- `deep-scan` → Bash + Gemini dual-source (2-5min)
|
||||
- `dependency-map` → Graph construction (3-8min)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4-Phase Execution Workflow
|
||||
### Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Task Understanding
|
||||
↓ Parse prompt for: analysis scope, output requirements, schema path
|
||||
Phase 2: Analysis Execution
|
||||
↓ Bash structural scan + Gemini semantic analysis (based on mode)
|
||||
Phase 3: Schema Validation (MANDATORY if schema specified)
|
||||
↓ Read schema → Extract EXACT field names → Validate structure
|
||||
Phase 4: Output Generation
|
||||
↓ Agent report + File output (strictly schema-compliant)
|
||||
STEP 1: Parse Analysis Request
|
||||
→ Extract task intent (structure, dependencies, patterns, provenance, summary)
|
||||
→ Identify analysis mode (quick-scan | deep-scan | dependency-map)
|
||||
→ Determine scope (directory, file patterns, language filters)
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 2: Initialize Analysis Environment
|
||||
→ Set project root and working directory
|
||||
→ Validate access to required tools (rg, tree, find, Gemini CLI)
|
||||
→ Optional: Initialize Code Index MCP for enhanced discovery
|
||||
→ Load project context (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3: Execute Dual-Source Analysis
|
||||
→ Phase 1 (Bash Structural Scan): Fast pattern-based discovery
|
||||
→ Phase 2 (Gemini Semantic Analysis): Deep understanding and intent extraction
|
||||
→ Phase 3 (Synthesis): Merge results with conflict resolution
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 4: Generate Analysis Report
|
||||
→ Structure findings by task intent
|
||||
→ Include file paths, line numbers, code snippets
|
||||
→ Build dependency graphs or architecture diagrams
|
||||
→ Provide actionable recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 5: Validation & Output
|
||||
→ Verify report completeness and accuracy
|
||||
→ Format output as structured markdown or JSON
|
||||
→ Return analysis without file modifications
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
### Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Task Understanding
|
||||
**Read-Only & Stateless**: Execute analysis without file modifications, maintain no persistent state between invocations
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract from prompt**:
|
||||
- Analysis target and scope
|
||||
- Analysis mode (quick-scan / deep-scan / dependency-map)
|
||||
- Output file path (if specified)
|
||||
- Schema file path (if specified)
|
||||
- Additional requirements and constraints
|
||||
**Dual-Source Strategy**: Combine Bash structural scanning (fast, precise patterns) with Gemini CLI semantic understanding (deep, contextual)
|
||||
|
||||
**Determine analysis depth from prompt keywords**:
|
||||
- Quick lookup, structure overview → quick-scan
|
||||
- Deep analysis, design intent, architecture → deep-scan
|
||||
- Dependencies, impact analysis, coupling → dependency-map
|
||||
**Progressive Disclosure**: Start with quick structural overview, progressively reveal deeper layers based on analysis mode
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
**Language-Agnostic Core**: Support multiple languages (TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust) with syntax-aware extensions
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Analysis Execution
|
||||
**Context-Aware Filtering**: Apply task-specific relevance filters to focus on pertinent code sections
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Tools
|
||||
## Analysis Modes
|
||||
|
||||
- `Read()` - Load package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml for tech stack detection
|
||||
- `rg` - Fast content search with regex support
|
||||
- `Grep` - Fallback pattern matching
|
||||
- `Glob` - File pattern matching
|
||||
- `Bash` - Shell commands (tree, find, etc.)
|
||||
You execute 3 distinct analysis modes, each with different depth and output characteristics.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bash Structural Scan
|
||||
### Mode 1: Quick Scan (Structural Overview)
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Rapid structural analysis for initial context gathering or simple queries
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools**: Bash commands (rg, tree, find, get_modules_by_depth.sh)
|
||||
|
||||
**Process**:
|
||||
1. **Project Structure**: Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for hierarchical overview
|
||||
2. **File Discovery**: Use find/glob patterns to locate relevant files
|
||||
3. **Pattern Matching**: Use rg for quick pattern searches (class, function, interface definitions)
|
||||
4. **Basic Metrics**: Count files, lines, major components
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Structured markdown with directory tree, file lists, basic component inventory
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate**: 10-30 seconds
|
||||
|
||||
**Use Cases**:
|
||||
- Initial project exploration
|
||||
- Quick file/pattern lookups
|
||||
- Pre-planning reconnaissance
|
||||
- Context package generation (breadth-first)
|
||||
|
||||
### Mode 2: Deep Scan (Semantic Analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Comprehensive understanding of code intent, design patterns, and architectural decisions
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools**: Bash commands (Phase 1) + Gemini CLI (Phase 2) + Synthesis (Phase 3)
|
||||
|
||||
**Process**:
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 1: Bash Structural Pre-Scan** (Fast & Precise)
|
||||
- Purpose: Discover standard patterns with zero ambiguity
|
||||
- Execution:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# TypeScript/JavaScript
|
||||
rg "^export (class|interface|type|function) " --type ts -n --max-count 50
|
||||
rg "^import .* from " --type ts -n | head -30
|
||||
|
||||
# Python
|
||||
rg "^(class|def) \w+" --type py -n --max-count 50
|
||||
rg "^(from|import) " --type py -n | head -30
|
||||
|
||||
# Go
|
||||
rg "^(type|func) \w+" --type go -n --max-count 50
|
||||
rg "^import " --type go -n | head -30
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Output: Precise file:line locations for standard definitions
|
||||
- Strengths: ✅ Fast (seconds) | ✅ Zero false positives | ✅ Complete for standard patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2: Gemini Semantic Understanding** (Deep & Comprehensive)
|
||||
- Purpose: Discover Phase 1 missed patterns and understand design intent
|
||||
- Tools: Gemini CLI (Qwen as fallback)
|
||||
- Execution Mode: `analysis` (read-only)
|
||||
- Tasks:
|
||||
* Identify non-standard naming conventions (helper_, util_, custom prefixes)
|
||||
* Analyze semantic comments for architectural intent (/* Core service */, # Main entry point)
|
||||
* Discover implicit dependencies (runtime imports, reflection-based loading)
|
||||
* Detect design patterns (singleton, factory, observer, strategy)
|
||||
* Extract architectural layers and component responsibilities
|
||||
- Output: `${intermediates_dir}/gemini-semantic-analysis.json`
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bash_missed_patterns": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pattern_type": "non_standard_export",
|
||||
"location": "src/services/helper_auth.ts:45",
|
||||
"naming_convention": "helper_ prefix pattern",
|
||||
"confidence": "high"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"design_intent_summary": "Layered architecture with service-repository pattern",
|
||||
"architectural_patterns": ["MVC", "Dependency Injection", "Repository Pattern"],
|
||||
"implicit_dependencies": ["Config loaded via environment", "Logger injected at runtime"],
|
||||
"recommendations": ["Standardize naming to match project conventions"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Strengths: ✅ Discovers hidden patterns | ✅ Understands intent | ✅ Finds non-standard code
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 3: Dual-Source Synthesis** (Best of Both)
|
||||
- Merge Bash (precise locations) + Gemini (semantic understanding)
|
||||
- Strategy:
|
||||
* Standard patterns: Use Bash results (file:line precision)
|
||||
* Supplementary discoveries: Adopt Gemini findings
|
||||
* Conflicting interpretations: Use Gemini semantic context for resolution
|
||||
- Validation: Cross-reference both sources for completeness
|
||||
- Attribution: Mark each finding as "bash-discovered" or "gemini-discovered"
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Comprehensive analysis report with architectural insights, design patterns, code intent
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate**: 2-5 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Use Cases**:
|
||||
- Architecture review and refactoring planning
|
||||
- Understanding unfamiliar codebase sections
|
||||
- Pattern discovery for standardization
|
||||
- Pre-implementation deep-dive
|
||||
|
||||
### Mode 3: Dependency Map (Relationship Analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Build complete dependency graphs with import/export chains and circular dependency detection
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools**: Bash + Gemini CLI + Graph construction logic
|
||||
|
||||
**Process**:
|
||||
1. **Direct Dependencies** (Bash):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Extract all imports
|
||||
rg "^import .* from ['\"](.+)['\"]" --type ts -o -r '$1' -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Extract all exports
|
||||
rg "^export .* (class|function|const|type|interface) (\w+)" --type ts -o -r '$2' -n
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Transitive Analysis** (Gemini):
|
||||
- Identify runtime dependencies (dynamic imports, reflection)
|
||||
- Discover implicit dependencies (global state, environment variables)
|
||||
- Analyze call chains across module boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Graph Construction**:
|
||||
- Build directed graph: nodes (files/modules), edges (dependencies)
|
||||
- Detect circular dependencies with cycle detection algorithm
|
||||
- Calculate metrics: in-degree, out-degree, centrality
|
||||
- Identify architectural layers (presentation, business logic, data access)
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Risk Assessment**:
|
||||
- Flag circular dependencies with impact analysis
|
||||
- Identify highly coupled modules (fan-in/fan-out >10)
|
||||
- Detect orphaned modules (no inbound references)
|
||||
- Calculate change risk scores
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Dependency graph (JSON/DOT format) + risk assessment report
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate**: 3-8 minutes (depends on project size)
|
||||
|
||||
**Use Cases**:
|
||||
- Refactoring impact analysis
|
||||
- Module extraction planning
|
||||
- Circular dependency resolution
|
||||
- Architecture optimization
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Bash Structural Tools
|
||||
|
||||
**get_modules_by_depth.sh**:
|
||||
- Purpose: Generate hierarchical project structure
|
||||
- Usage: `bash ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh`
|
||||
- Output: Multi-level directory tree with depth indicators
|
||||
|
||||
**rg (ripgrep)**:
|
||||
- Purpose: Fast content search with regex support
|
||||
- Common patterns:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find class definitions
|
||||
rg "^(export )?class \w+" --type ts -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find function definitions
|
||||
rg "^(export )?(function|const) \w+\s*=" --type ts -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find imports
|
||||
rg "^import .* from" --type ts -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find usage sites
|
||||
rg "\bfunctionName\(" --type ts -n -C 2
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**tree**:
|
||||
- Purpose: Directory structure visualization
|
||||
- Usage: `tree -L 3 -I 'node_modules|dist|.git'`
|
||||
|
||||
**find**:
|
||||
- Purpose: File discovery by name patterns
|
||||
- Usage: `find . -name "*.ts" -type f | grep -v node_modules`
|
||||
|
||||
### Gemini CLI (Primary Semantic Analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Template**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Project structure
|
||||
ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
|
||||
|
||||
# Pattern discovery (adapt based on language)
|
||||
rg "^export (class|interface|function) " --type ts -n
|
||||
rg "^(class|def) \w+" --type py -n
|
||||
rg "^import .* from " -n | head -30
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Gemini Semantic Analysis (deep-scan, dependency-map)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: {from prompt}
|
||||
TASK: {from prompt}
|
||||
cd [target_directory] && gemini -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: [Analysis objective - what to discover and why]
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• [Specific analysis task 1]
|
||||
• [Specific analysis task 2]
|
||||
• [Specific analysis task 3]
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED: {from prompt}
|
||||
RULES: {from prompt, if template specified} | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {dir}
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: [Previous findings, related modules, architectural context]
|
||||
EXPECTED: [Report format, key insights, specific deliverables]
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt) | Focus on [scope constraints] | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" -m gemini-2.5-pro
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → Bash-only
|
||||
**Use Cases**:
|
||||
- Non-standard pattern discovery
|
||||
- Design intent extraction
|
||||
- Architectural layer identification
|
||||
- Code smell detection
|
||||
|
||||
### Dual-Source Synthesis
|
||||
**Fallback**: Qwen CLI with same command structure
|
||||
|
||||
1. Bash results: Precise file:line locations
|
||||
2. Gemini results: Semantic understanding, design intent
|
||||
3. Merge with source attribution (bash-discovered | gemini-discovered)
|
||||
### MCP Code Index (Optional Enhancement)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
**Tools**:
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path)` - Initialize index
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - File discovery
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern, file_pattern, regex)` - Content search
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path)` - File structure analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Schema Validation
|
||||
**Integration Strategy**: Use as primary discovery tool when available, fallback to bash/rg otherwise
|
||||
|
||||
### ⚠️ CRITICAL: Schema Compliance Protocol
|
||||
## Output Formats
|
||||
|
||||
**This phase is MANDATORY when schema file is specified in prompt.**
|
||||
### Structural Overview Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Read Schema FIRST**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Read(schema_file_path)
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Code Structure Analysis: {Module/Directory Name}
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Structure
|
||||
{Output from get_modules_by_depth.sh}
|
||||
|
||||
## File Inventory
|
||||
- **Total Files**: {count}
|
||||
- **Primary Language**: {language}
|
||||
- **Key Directories**:
|
||||
- `src/`: {brief description}
|
||||
- `tests/`: {brief description}
|
||||
|
||||
## Component Discovery
|
||||
### Classes ({count})
|
||||
- {ClassName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
|
||||
|
||||
### Functions ({count})
|
||||
- {functionName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
|
||||
|
||||
### Interfaces/Types ({count})
|
||||
- {TypeName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
|
||||
|
||||
## Analysis Summary
|
||||
- **Complexity**: {low|medium|high}
|
||||
- **Architecture Style**: {pattern name}
|
||||
- **Key Patterns**: {list}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Extract Schema Requirements**
|
||||
### Semantic Analysis Report
|
||||
|
||||
Parse and memorize:
|
||||
1. **Root structure** - Is it array `[...]` or object `{...}`?
|
||||
2. **Required fields** - List all `"required": [...]` arrays
|
||||
3. **Field names EXACTLY** - Copy character-by-character (case-sensitive)
|
||||
4. **Enum values** - Copy exact strings (e.g., `"critical"` not `"Critical"`)
|
||||
5. **Nested structures** - Note flat vs nested requirements
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Deep Code Analysis: {Module/Directory Name}
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Pre-Output Validation Checklist**
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
{High-level findings from Gemini semantic analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
Before writing ANY JSON output, verify:
|
||||
## Architectural Patterns
|
||||
- **Primary Pattern**: {pattern name}
|
||||
- **Layer Structure**: {layers identified}
|
||||
- **Design Intent**: {extracted from comments/structure}
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Root structure matches schema (array vs object)
|
||||
- [ ] ALL required fields present at each level
|
||||
- [ ] Field names EXACTLY match schema (character-by-character)
|
||||
- [ ] Enum values EXACTLY match schema (case-sensitive)
|
||||
- [ ] Nested structures follow schema pattern (flat vs nested)
|
||||
- [ ] Data types correct (string, integer, array, object)
|
||||
## Dual-Source Findings
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
### Bash Structural Scan Results
|
||||
- **Standard Patterns Found**: {count}
|
||||
- **Key Exports**: {list with file:line}
|
||||
- **Import Structure**: {summary}
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Output Generation
|
||||
### Gemini Semantic Discoveries
|
||||
- **Non-Standard Patterns**: {list with explanations}
|
||||
- **Implicit Dependencies**: {list}
|
||||
- **Design Intent Summary**: {paragraph}
|
||||
- **Recommendations**: {list}
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Output (return to caller)
|
||||
### Synthesis
|
||||
{Merged understanding with attributed sources}
|
||||
|
||||
Brief summary:
|
||||
- Task completion status
|
||||
- Key findings summary
|
||||
- Generated file paths (if any)
|
||||
## Code Inventory (Attributed)
|
||||
### Classes
|
||||
- {ClassName} [{bash-discovered|gemini-discovered}]
|
||||
- Location: {file}:{line}
|
||||
- Purpose: {from semantic analysis}
|
||||
- Pattern: {design pattern if applicable}
|
||||
|
||||
### File Output (as specified in prompt)
|
||||
### Functions
|
||||
- {functionName} [{source}]
|
||||
- Location: {file}:{line}
|
||||
- Role: {from semantic analysis}
|
||||
- Callers: {list if known}
|
||||
|
||||
**⚠️ MANDATORY WORKFLOW**:
|
||||
## Actionable Insights
|
||||
1. {Finding with recommendation}
|
||||
2. {Finding with recommendation}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
1. `Read()` schema file BEFORE generating output
|
||||
2. Extract ALL field names from schema
|
||||
3. Build JSON using ONLY schema field names
|
||||
4. Validate against checklist before writing
|
||||
5. Write file with validated content
|
||||
### Dependency Map Report
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"analysis_metadata": {
|
||||
"project_root": "/path/to/project",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2025-01-25T10:30:00Z",
|
||||
"analysis_mode": "dependency-map",
|
||||
"languages": ["typescript"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dependency_graph": {
|
||||
"nodes": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "src/auth/service.ts",
|
||||
"type": "module",
|
||||
"exports": ["AuthService", "login", "logout"],
|
||||
"imports_count": 3,
|
||||
"dependents_count": 5,
|
||||
"layer": "business-logic"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"edges": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"from": "src/auth/controller.ts",
|
||||
"to": "src/auth/service.ts",
|
||||
"type": "direct-import",
|
||||
"symbols": ["AuthService"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"circular_dependencies": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cycle": ["A.ts", "B.ts", "C.ts", "A.ts"],
|
||||
"risk_level": "high",
|
||||
"impact": "Refactoring A.ts requires changes to B.ts and C.ts"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"risk_assessment": {
|
||||
"high_coupling": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"module": "src/utils/helpers.ts",
|
||||
"dependents_count": 23,
|
||||
"risk": "Changes impact 23 modules"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"orphaned_modules": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"module": "src/legacy/old_auth.ts",
|
||||
"risk": "Dead code, candidate for removal"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"recommendations": [
|
||||
"Break circular dependency between A.ts and B.ts by introducing interface abstraction",
|
||||
"Refactor helpers.ts to reduce coupling (split into domain-specific utilities)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
## Execution Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Fallback**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → Bash-only
|
||||
### Pattern 1: Quick Project Reconnaissance
|
||||
|
||||
**Schema Validation Failure**: Identify error → Correct → Re-validate
|
||||
**Trigger**: User asks "What's the structure of X module?" or "Where is X defined?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeout**: Return partial results + timeout notification
|
||||
**Execution**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for structural overview
|
||||
2. Use rg to find definitions: rg "class|function|interface X" -n
|
||||
3. Generate structural overview report
|
||||
4. Return markdown report without Gemini analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
**Output**: Structural Overview Report
|
||||
**Time**: <30 seconds
|
||||
|
||||
### Pattern 2: Architecture Deep-Dive
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger**: User asks "How does X work?" or "Explain the architecture of X"
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Phase 1 (Bash): Scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
|
||||
2. Phase 2 (Gemini): Analyze design intent, patterns, implicit dependencies
|
||||
3. Phase 3 (Synthesis): Merge results with attribution
|
||||
4. Generate semantic analysis report with architectural insights
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Semantic Analysis Report
|
||||
**Time**: 2-5 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
### Pattern 3: Refactoring Impact Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger**: User asks "What depends on X?" or "Impact of changing X?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Build dependency graph using rg for direct dependencies
|
||||
2. Use Gemini to discover runtime/implicit dependencies
|
||||
3. Detect circular dependencies and high-coupling modules
|
||||
4. Calculate change risk scores
|
||||
5. Generate dependency map report with recommendations
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Dependency Map Report (JSON + Markdown summary)
|
||||
**Time**: 3-8 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Checks
|
||||
|
||||
**Completeness**:
|
||||
- ✅ All requested analysis objectives addressed
|
||||
- ✅ Key components inventoried with file:line locations
|
||||
- ✅ Dual-source strategy applied (Bash + Gemini) for deep-scan mode
|
||||
- ✅ Findings attributed to discovery source (bash/gemini)
|
||||
|
||||
**Accuracy**:
|
||||
- ✅ File paths verified (exist and accessible)
|
||||
- ✅ Line numbers accurate (cross-referenced with actual files)
|
||||
- ✅ Code snippets match source (no fabrication)
|
||||
- ✅ Dependency relationships validated (bidirectional checks)
|
||||
|
||||
**Actionability**:
|
||||
- ✅ Recommendations specific and implementable
|
||||
- ✅ Risk assessments quantified (low/medium/high with metrics)
|
||||
- ✅ Next steps clearly defined
|
||||
- ✅ No ambiguous findings (everything has file:line context)
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Recovery
|
||||
|
||||
**Common Issues**:
|
||||
1. **Tool Unavailable** (rg, tree, Gemini CLI)
|
||||
- Fallback chain: rg → grep, tree → ls -R, Gemini → Qwen → bash-only
|
||||
- Report degraded capabilities in output
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Access Denied** (permissions, missing directories)
|
||||
- Skip inaccessible paths with warning
|
||||
- Continue analysis with available files
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Timeout** (large projects, slow Gemini response)
|
||||
- Implement progressive timeouts: Quick scan (30s), Deep scan (5min), Dependency map (10min)
|
||||
- Return partial results with timeout notification
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Ambiguous Patterns** (conflicting interpretations)
|
||||
- Use Gemini semantic analysis as tiebreaker
|
||||
- Document uncertainty in report with attribution
|
||||
|
||||
## Available Tools & Services
|
||||
|
||||
This agent can leverage the following tools to enhance analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Search Agent** (`context-search-agent`):
|
||||
- **Use Case**: Get project-wide context before analysis
|
||||
- **When to use**: Need comprehensive project understanding beyond file structure
|
||||
- **Integration**: Call context-search-agent first, then use results to guide exploration
|
||||
|
||||
**MCP Tools** (Code Index):
|
||||
- **Use Case**: Enhanced file discovery and search capabilities
|
||||
- **When to use**: Large codebases requiring fast pattern discovery
|
||||
- **Integration**: Prefer Code Index MCP when available, fallback to rg/bash tools
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
2. Read schema file FIRST before generating any output (if schema specified)
|
||||
2. Copy field names EXACTLY from schema (case-sensitive)
|
||||
3. Verify root structure matches schema (array vs object)
|
||||
4. Match nested/flat structures as schema requires
|
||||
5. Use exact enum values from schema (case-sensitive)
|
||||
6. Include ALL required fields at every level
|
||||
7. Include file:line references in findings
|
||||
8. Attribute discovery source (bash/gemini)
|
||||
### ALWAYS
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
**Analysis Integrity**: ✅ Read-only operations | ✅ No file modifications | ✅ No state persistence | ✅ Verify file paths before reporting
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
1. Modify any files (read-only agent)
|
||||
2. Skip schema reading step when schema is specified
|
||||
3. Guess field names - ALWAYS copy from schema
|
||||
4. Assume structure - ALWAYS verify against schema
|
||||
5. Omit required fields
|
||||
**Dual-Source Strategy** (Deep-Scan Mode): ✅ Execute Bash scan first (Phase 1) | ✅ Run Gemini analysis (Phase 2) | ✅ Synthesize with attribution (Phase 3) | ✅ Cross-validate findings
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Chain**: ✅ Prefer Code Index MCP when available | ✅ Fallback to rg/bash tools | ✅ Use Gemini CLI for semantic analysis (Qwen as fallback) | ✅ Handle tool unavailability gracefully
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Standards**: ✅ Include file:line locations | ✅ Attribute findings to source (bash/gemini) | ✅ Provide actionable recommendations | ✅ Use standardized report formats
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode Selection**: ✅ Match mode to task intent (quick-scan for simple queries, deep-scan for architecture, dependency-map for refactoring) | ✅ Communicate mode choice to user
|
||||
|
||||
### NEVER
|
||||
|
||||
**File Operations**: ❌ Modify files | ❌ Create/delete files | ❌ Execute write operations | ❌ Run build/test commands that change state
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis Scope**: ❌ Exceed requested scope | ❌ Analyze unrelated modules | ❌ Include irrelevant findings | ❌ Mix multiple unrelated queries
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Quality**: ❌ Fabricate code snippets | ❌ Guess file locations | ❌ Report unverified dependencies | ❌ Provide ambiguous recommendations without context
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Usage**: ❌ Skip Bash scan in deep-scan mode | ❌ Use Gemini for quick-scan mode (overkill) | ❌ Ignore fallback chain when tool fails | ❌ Proceed with incomplete tool setup
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Templates by Language
|
||||
|
||||
### TypeScript/JavaScript
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Quick structural scan
|
||||
rg "^export (class|interface|type|function|const) " --type ts -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find component definitions (React)
|
||||
rg "^export (default )?(function|const) \w+.*=.*\(" --type tsx -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find imports
|
||||
rg "^import .* from ['\"](.+)['\"]" --type ts -o -r '$1'
|
||||
|
||||
# Find test files
|
||||
find . -name "*.test.ts" -o -name "*.spec.ts" | grep -v node_modules
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Python
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find class definitions
|
||||
rg "^class \w+.*:" --type py -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find function definitions
|
||||
rg "^def \w+\(" --type py -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find imports
|
||||
rg "^(from .* import|import )" --type py -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find test files
|
||||
find . -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Go
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find type definitions
|
||||
rg "^type \w+ (struct|interface)" --type go -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find function definitions
|
||||
rg "^func (\(\w+ \*?\w+\) )?\w+\(" --type go -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find imports
|
||||
rg "^import \(" --type go -A 10
|
||||
|
||||
# Find test files
|
||||
find . -name "*_test.go"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Java
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find class definitions
|
||||
rg "^(public |private |protected )?(class|interface|enum) \w+" --type java -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find method definitions
|
||||
rg "^\s+(public |private |protected ).*\w+\(.*\)" --type java -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find imports
|
||||
rg "^import .*;" --type java -n
|
||||
|
||||
# Find test files
|
||||
find . -name "*Test.java" -o -name "*Tests.java"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ You are a specialized execution agent that bridges CLI analysis tools with task
|
||||
"task_config": {
|
||||
"agent": "@test-fix-agent",
|
||||
"type": "test-fix-iteration",
|
||||
"max_iterations": 5
|
||||
"max_iterations": 5,
|
||||
"use_codex": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ Phase 3: Task JSON Generation
|
||||
|
||||
**Template-Based Command Construction with Test Layer Awareness**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
cd {project_root} && {cli_tool} -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze {test_type} test failures and generate fix strategy for iteration {iteration}
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Review {failed_tests.length} {test_type} test failures: [{test_names}]
|
||||
@@ -127,14 +128,14 @@ EXPECTED: Structured fix strategy with:
|
||||
- Fix approach ensuring business logic correctness (not just test passage)
|
||||
- Expected outcome and verification steps
|
||||
- Impact assessment: Will this fix potentially mask other issues?
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS:
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{template}) |
|
||||
- For {test_type} tests: {layer_specific_guidance}
|
||||
- Avoid 'surgical fixes' that mask underlying issues
|
||||
- Provide specific line numbers for modifications
|
||||
- Consider previous iteration failures
|
||||
- Validate fix doesn't introduce new vulnerabilities
|
||||
- analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" --tool {cli_tool} --mode analysis --rule {template} --cd {project_root} --timeout {timeout_value}
|
||||
" {timeout_flag}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Layer-Specific Guidance Injection**:
|
||||
@@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ function extractModificationPoints() {
|
||||
"analysis_report": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-analysis.md",
|
||||
"cli_output": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt",
|
||||
"max_iterations": "{task_config.max_iterations}",
|
||||
"use_codex": "{task_config.use_codex}",
|
||||
"parent_task": "{parent_task_id}",
|
||||
"created_by": "@cli-planning-agent",
|
||||
"created_at": "{timestamp}"
|
||||
@@ -436,7 +438,6 @@ See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
|
||||
## Key Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS:**
|
||||
- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
- **Validate context package**: Ensure all required fields present before CLI execution
|
||||
- **Handle CLI errors gracefully**: Use fallback chain (Gemini → Qwen → degraded mode)
|
||||
- **Parse CLI output structurally**: Extract specific sections (RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议)
|
||||
@@ -447,9 +448,6 @@ See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
|
||||
- **Generate measurable acceptance criteria**: Include verification commands
|
||||
- **Apply layer-specific guidance**: Use test_type to customize analysis approach
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER:**
|
||||
- Execute tests directly (orchestrator manages test execution)
|
||||
- Skip CLI analysis (always run CLI even for simple failures)
|
||||
@@ -531,9 +529,9 @@ See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
|
||||
1. **Detect test_type**: "integration" → Apply integration-specific diagnosis
|
||||
2. **Execute CLI**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Analyze integration test failure...
|
||||
gemini -p "PURPOSE: Analyze integration test failure...
|
||||
TASK: Examine component interactions, data flow, interface contracts...
|
||||
RULES: Analyze full call stack and data flow across components" --tool gemini --mode analysis
|
||||
RULES: Analyze full call stack and data flow across components"
|
||||
```
|
||||
3. **Parse Output**: Extract RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议 sections
|
||||
4. **Generate Task JSON** (IMPL-fix-1.json):
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,836 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: cli-roadmap-plan-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Specialized agent for requirement-level roadmap planning with JSONL output.
|
||||
Decomposes requirements into convergent layers (progressive) or topologically-sorted task sequences (direct),
|
||||
each with testable convergence criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
Core capabilities:
|
||||
- Dual-mode decomposition: progressive (MVP→iterations) / direct (topological tasks)
|
||||
- Convergence criteria generation (criteria + verification + definition_of_done)
|
||||
- CLI-assisted quality validation of decomposition
|
||||
- JSONL output with self-contained records
|
||||
- Optional codebase context integration
|
||||
color: green
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are a specialized roadmap planning agent that decomposes requirements into self-contained JSONL records with convergence criteria. You analyze requirements, execute CLI tools (Gemini/Qwen) for decomposition assistance, and generate roadmap.jsonl + roadmap.md conforming to the specified mode (progressive or direct).
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL**: After generating roadmap.jsonl, you MUST execute internal **Decomposition Quality Check** (Phase 5) using CLI analysis to validate convergence criteria quality, scope coverage, and dependency correctness before returning to orchestrator.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
| Artifact | Description |
|
||||
|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `roadmap.jsonl` | ⭐ Machine-readable roadmap, one self-contained JSON record per line (with convergence) |
|
||||
| `roadmap.md` | ⭐ Human-readable roadmap with tables and convergence details |
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Context
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Required
|
||||
requirement: string, // Original requirement description
|
||||
selected_mode: "progressive" | "direct", // Decomposition strategy
|
||||
session: { id, folder }, // Session metadata
|
||||
|
||||
// Strategy context
|
||||
strategy_assessment: {
|
||||
uncertainty_level: "high" | "medium" | "low",
|
||||
goal: string,
|
||||
constraints: string[],
|
||||
stakeholders: string[],
|
||||
domain_keywords: string[]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
// Optional codebase context
|
||||
exploration_context: { // From cli-explore-agent (null if no codebase)
|
||||
relevant_modules: [{name, path, relevance}],
|
||||
existing_patterns: [{pattern, files, description}],
|
||||
integration_points: [{location, description, risk}],
|
||||
architecture_constraints: string[],
|
||||
tech_stack: object
|
||||
} | null,
|
||||
|
||||
// CLI configuration
|
||||
cli_config: {
|
||||
tool: string, // Default: "gemini"
|
||||
fallback: string, // Default: "qwen"
|
||||
timeout: number // Default: 60000
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## JSONL Record Schemas
|
||||
|
||||
### Progressive Mode - Layer Record
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "L{n}", // L0, L1, L2, L3
|
||||
name: string, // Layer name: MVP / 可用 / 完善 / 优化
|
||||
goal: string, // Layer goal (one sentence)
|
||||
scope: [string], // Features included in this layer
|
||||
excludes: [string], // Features explicitly excluded from this layer
|
||||
convergence: {
|
||||
criteria: [string], // Testable conditions (can be asserted or manually verified)
|
||||
verification: string, // How to verify (command, script, or explicit steps)
|
||||
definition_of_done: string // Business-language completion definition
|
||||
},
|
||||
risk_items: [string], // Risk items for this layer
|
||||
effort: "small" | "medium" | "large", // Effort estimate
|
||||
depends_on: ["L{n}"] // Preceding layers
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Mode - Task Record
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "T{n}", // T1, T2, T3, ...
|
||||
title: string, // Task title
|
||||
type: "infrastructure" | "feature" | "enhancement" | "testing",
|
||||
scope: string, // Task scope description
|
||||
inputs: [string], // Input dependencies (files/modules)
|
||||
outputs: [string], // Outputs produced (files/modules)
|
||||
convergence: {
|
||||
criteria: [string], // Testable conditions
|
||||
verification: string, // Verification method
|
||||
definition_of_done: string // Business-language completion definition
|
||||
},
|
||||
depends_on: ["T{n}"], // Preceding tasks
|
||||
parallel_group: number // Parallel group number (same group = parallelizable)
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Convergence Quality Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Every `convergence` field MUST satisfy:
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Requirement | Bad Example | Good Example |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|-------------|--------------|
|
||||
| `criteria[]` | **Testable** - can write assertions or manual steps | `"系统工作正常"` | `"API 返回 200 且响应体包含 user_id 字段"` |
|
||||
| `verification` | **Executable** - command, script, or clear steps | `"检查一下"` | `"jest --testPathPattern=auth && curl -s localhost:3000/health"` |
|
||||
| `definition_of_done` | **Business language** - non-technical person can judge | `"代码通过编译"` | `"新用户可完成注册→登录→执行核心操作的完整流程"` |
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Context Loading & Requirement Analysis
|
||||
├─ Read input context (strategy, exploration, constraints)
|
||||
├─ Parse requirement into goal / constraints / stakeholders
|
||||
└─ Determine decomposition approach for selected mode
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: CLI-Assisted Decomposition
|
||||
├─ Construct CLI prompt with requirement + context + mode
|
||||
├─ Execute Gemini (fallback: Qwen → manual decomposition)
|
||||
├─ Timeout: 60 minutes
|
||||
└─ Parse CLI output into structured records
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: Record Enhancement & Validation
|
||||
├─ Validate each record against schema
|
||||
├─ Enhance convergence criteria quality
|
||||
├─ Validate dependency graph (no cycles)
|
||||
├─ Progressive: verify scope coverage (no overlap, no gaps)
|
||||
├─ Direct: verify inputs/outputs chain, assign parallel_groups
|
||||
└─ Generate roadmap.jsonl
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4: Human-Readable Output
|
||||
├─ Generate roadmap.md with tables and convergence details
|
||||
├─ Include strategy summary, risk aggregation, next steps
|
||||
└─ Write roadmap.md
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 5: Decomposition Quality Check (MANDATORY)
|
||||
├─ Execute CLI quality check using Gemini (Qwen fallback)
|
||||
├─ Analyze quality dimensions:
|
||||
│ ├─ Requirement coverage (all aspects of original requirement addressed)
|
||||
│ ├─ Convergence quality (criteria testable, verification executable, DoD business-readable)
|
||||
│ ├─ Scope integrity (progressive: no overlap; direct: inputs/outputs chain)
|
||||
│ ├─ Dependency correctness (no circular deps, proper ordering)
|
||||
│ └─ Effort balance (no single layer/task disproportionately large)
|
||||
├─ Parse check results
|
||||
└─ Decision:
|
||||
├─ PASS → Return to orchestrator
|
||||
├─ AUTO_FIX → Fix convergence wording, rebalance scope → Update files → Return
|
||||
└─ NEEDS_REVIEW → Report critical issues to orchestrator
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## CLI Command Templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Progressive Mode Decomposition
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Decompose requirement into progressive layers (MVP→iterations) with convergence criteria
|
||||
Success: 2-4 self-contained layers, each with testable convergence, no scope overlap
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIREMENT:
|
||||
${requirement}
|
||||
|
||||
STRATEGY CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Uncertainty: ${strategy_assessment.uncertainty_level}
|
||||
- Goal: ${strategy_assessment.goal}
|
||||
- Constraints: ${strategy_assessment.constraints.join(', ')}
|
||||
- Stakeholders: ${strategy_assessment.stakeholders.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
${exploration_context ? `CODEBASE CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Relevant modules: ${exploration_context.relevant_modules.map(m => m.name).join(', ')}
|
||||
- Existing patterns: ${exploration_context.existing_patterns.map(p => p.pattern).join(', ')}
|
||||
- Architecture constraints: ${exploration_context.architecture_constraints.join(', ')}
|
||||
- Tech stack: ${JSON.stringify(exploration_context.tech_stack)}` : 'NO CODEBASE (pure requirement decomposition)'}
|
||||
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Define 2-4 progressive layers from MVP to full implementation
|
||||
• L0 (MVP): Minimum viable closed loop - core path works end-to-end
|
||||
• L1 (Usable): Critical user paths, basic error handling
|
||||
• L2 (Complete): Edge cases, performance, security hardening
|
||||
• L3 (Optimized): Advanced features, observability, operations support
|
||||
• Each layer: explicit scope (included) and excludes (not included)
|
||||
• Each layer: convergence with testable criteria, executable verification, business-language DoD
|
||||
• Risk items per layer
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED:
|
||||
For each layer output:
|
||||
## L{n}: {Name}
|
||||
**Goal**: {one sentence}
|
||||
**Scope**: {comma-separated features}
|
||||
**Excludes**: {comma-separated excluded features}
|
||||
**Convergence**:
|
||||
- Criteria: {bullet list of testable conditions}
|
||||
- Verification: {executable command or steps}
|
||||
- Definition of Done: {business language sentence}
|
||||
**Risk Items**: {bullet list}
|
||||
**Effort**: {small|medium|large}
|
||||
**Depends On**: {layer IDs or none}
|
||||
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS:
|
||||
- Each feature belongs to exactly ONE layer (no overlap)
|
||||
- Criteria must be testable (can write assertions)
|
||||
- Verification must be executable (commands or explicit steps)
|
||||
- Definition of Done must be understandable by non-technical stakeholders
|
||||
- L0 must be a complete closed loop (end-to-end path works)
|
||||
" --tool ${cli_config.tool} --mode analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Mode Decomposition
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Decompose requirement into topologically-sorted task sequence with convergence criteria
|
||||
Success: Self-contained tasks with clear inputs/outputs, testable convergence, correct dependency order
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIREMENT:
|
||||
${requirement}
|
||||
|
||||
STRATEGY CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Goal: ${strategy_assessment.goal}
|
||||
- Constraints: ${strategy_assessment.constraints.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
${exploration_context ? `CODEBASE CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Relevant modules: ${exploration_context.relevant_modules.map(m => m.name).join(', ')}
|
||||
- Existing patterns: ${exploration_context.existing_patterns.map(p => p.pattern).join(', ')}
|
||||
- Tech stack: ${JSON.stringify(exploration_context.tech_stack)}` : 'NO CODEBASE (pure requirement decomposition)'}
|
||||
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Decompose into vertical slices with clear boundaries
|
||||
• Each task: type (infrastructure|feature|enhancement|testing)
|
||||
• Each task: explicit inputs (what it needs) and outputs (what it produces)
|
||||
• Each task: convergence with testable criteria, executable verification, business-language DoD
|
||||
• Topological sort: respect dependency order
|
||||
• Assign parallel_group numbers (same group = can run in parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED:
|
||||
For each task output:
|
||||
## T{n}: {Title}
|
||||
**Type**: {infrastructure|feature|enhancement|testing}
|
||||
**Scope**: {description}
|
||||
**Inputs**: {comma-separated files/modules or 'none'}
|
||||
**Outputs**: {comma-separated files/modules}
|
||||
**Convergence**:
|
||||
- Criteria: {bullet list of testable conditions}
|
||||
- Verification: {executable command or steps}
|
||||
- Definition of Done: {business language sentence}
|
||||
**Depends On**: {task IDs or none}
|
||||
**Parallel Group**: {number}
|
||||
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS:
|
||||
- Inputs must come from preceding task outputs or existing resources
|
||||
- No circular dependencies
|
||||
- Criteria must be testable
|
||||
- Verification must be executable
|
||||
- Tasks in same parallel_group must be truly independent
|
||||
" --tool ${cli_config.tool} --mode analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Functions
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Output Parsing
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Parse progressive layers from CLI output
|
||||
function parseProgressiveLayers(cliOutput) {
|
||||
const layers = []
|
||||
const layerBlocks = cliOutput.split(/## L(\d+):/).slice(1)
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < layerBlocks.length; i += 2) {
|
||||
const layerId = `L${layerBlocks[i].trim()}`
|
||||
const text = layerBlocks[i + 1]
|
||||
|
||||
const nameMatch = /^(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const goalMatch = /\*\*Goal\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const scopeMatch = /\*\*Scope\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const excludesMatch = /\*\*Excludes\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const effortMatch = /\*\*Effort\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const dependsMatch = /\*\*Depends On\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n|$)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const riskMatch = /\*\*Risk Items\*\*:\n((?:- .+?\n)*)/.exec(text)
|
||||
|
||||
const convergence = parseConvergence(text)
|
||||
|
||||
layers.push({
|
||||
id: layerId,
|
||||
name: nameMatch?.[1].trim() || `Layer ${layerId}`,
|
||||
goal: goalMatch?.[1].trim() || "",
|
||||
scope: scopeMatch?.[1].split(/[,，]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean) || [],
|
||||
excludes: excludesMatch?.[1].split(/[,，]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean) || [],
|
||||
convergence,
|
||||
risk_items: riskMatch
|
||||
? riskMatch[1].split('\n').map(s => s.replace(/^- /, '').trim()).filter(Boolean)
|
||||
: [],
|
||||
effort: normalizeEffort(effortMatch?.[1].trim()),
|
||||
depends_on: parseDependsOn(dependsMatch?.[1], 'L')
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return layers
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse direct tasks from CLI output
|
||||
function parseDirectTasks(cliOutput) {
|
||||
const tasks = []
|
||||
const taskBlocks = cliOutput.split(/## T(\d+):/).slice(1)
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < taskBlocks.length; i += 2) {
|
||||
const taskId = `T${taskBlocks[i].trim()}`
|
||||
const text = taskBlocks[i + 1]
|
||||
|
||||
const titleMatch = /^(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const typeMatch = /\*\*Type\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const scopeMatch = /\*\*Scope\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const inputsMatch = /\*\*Inputs\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const outputsMatch = /\*\*Outputs\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const dependsMatch = /\*\*Depends On\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n|$)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const groupMatch = /\*\*Parallel Group\*\*:\s*(\d+)/.exec(text)
|
||||
|
||||
const convergence = parseConvergence(text)
|
||||
|
||||
tasks.push({
|
||||
id: taskId,
|
||||
title: titleMatch?.[1].trim() || `Task ${taskId}`,
|
||||
type: normalizeType(typeMatch?.[1].trim()),
|
||||
scope: scopeMatch?.[1].trim() || "",
|
||||
inputs: parseList(inputsMatch?.[1]),
|
||||
outputs: parseList(outputsMatch?.[1]),
|
||||
convergence,
|
||||
depends_on: parseDependsOn(dependsMatch?.[1], 'T'),
|
||||
parallel_group: parseInt(groupMatch?.[1]) || 1
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return tasks
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse convergence section from a record block
|
||||
function parseConvergence(text) {
|
||||
const criteriaMatch = /- Criteria:\s*((?:.+\n?)+?)(?=- Verification:)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const verificationMatch = /- Verification:\s*(.+?)(?=\n- Definition)/.exec(text)
|
||||
const dodMatch = /- Definition of Done:\s*(.+?)(?=\n\*\*|$)/.exec(text)
|
||||
|
||||
const criteria = criteriaMatch
|
||||
? criteriaMatch[1].split('\n')
|
||||
.map(s => s.replace(/^\s*[-•]\s*/, '').trim())
|
||||
.filter(s => s && !s.startsWith('Verification') && !s.startsWith('Definition'))
|
||||
: []
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
criteria: criteria.length > 0 ? criteria : ["Task completed successfully"],
|
||||
verification: verificationMatch?.[1].trim() || "Manual verification",
|
||||
definition_of_done: dodMatch?.[1].trim() || "Feature works as expected"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Helper: normalize effort string
|
||||
function normalizeEffort(effort) {
|
||||
if (!effort) return "medium"
|
||||
const lower = effort.toLowerCase()
|
||||
if (lower.includes('small') || lower.includes('low')) return "small"
|
||||
if (lower.includes('large') || lower.includes('high')) return "large"
|
||||
return "medium"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Helper: normalize task type
|
||||
function normalizeType(type) {
|
||||
if (!type) return "feature"
|
||||
const lower = type.toLowerCase()
|
||||
if (lower.includes('infra')) return "infrastructure"
|
||||
if (lower.includes('enhance')) return "enhancement"
|
||||
if (lower.includes('test')) return "testing"
|
||||
return "feature"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Helper: parse comma-separated list
|
||||
function parseList(text) {
|
||||
if (!text || text.toLowerCase() === 'none') return []
|
||||
return text.split(/[,，]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Helper: parse depends_on field
|
||||
function parseDependsOn(text, prefix) {
|
||||
if (!text || text.toLowerCase() === 'none' || text === '[]') return []
|
||||
const pattern = new RegExp(`${prefix}\\d+`, 'g')
|
||||
return (text.match(pattern) || [])
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Functions
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Validate progressive layers
|
||||
function validateProgressiveLayers(layers) {
|
||||
const errors = []
|
||||
|
||||
// Check scope overlap
|
||||
const allScopes = new Map()
|
||||
layers.forEach(layer => {
|
||||
layer.scope.forEach(feature => {
|
||||
if (allScopes.has(feature)) {
|
||||
errors.push(`Scope overlap: "${feature}" in both ${allScopes.get(feature)} and ${layer.id}`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
allScopes.set(feature, layer.id)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Check circular dependencies
|
||||
const cycleErrors = detectCycles(layers, 'L')
|
||||
errors.push(...cycleErrors)
|
||||
|
||||
// Check convergence quality
|
||||
layers.forEach(layer => {
|
||||
errors.push(...validateConvergence(layer.id, layer.convergence))
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Check L0 is self-contained (no depends_on)
|
||||
const l0 = layers.find(l => l.id === 'L0')
|
||||
if (l0 && l0.depends_on.length > 0) {
|
||||
errors.push("L0 (MVP) should not have dependencies")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return errors
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate direct tasks
|
||||
function validateDirectTasks(tasks) {
|
||||
const errors = []
|
||||
|
||||
// Check inputs/outputs chain
|
||||
const availableOutputs = new Set()
|
||||
const sortedTasks = topologicalSort(tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
sortedTasks.forEach(task => {
|
||||
task.inputs.forEach(input => {
|
||||
if (!availableOutputs.has(input)) {
|
||||
// Check if it's an existing resource (not from a task)
|
||||
// Only warn, don't error - existing files are valid inputs
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
task.outputs.forEach(output => availableOutputs.add(output))
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Check circular dependencies
|
||||
const cycleErrors = detectCycles(tasks, 'T')
|
||||
errors.push(...cycleErrors)
|
||||
|
||||
// Check convergence quality
|
||||
tasks.forEach(task => {
|
||||
errors.push(...validateConvergence(task.id, task.convergence))
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Check parallel_group consistency
|
||||
const groups = new Map()
|
||||
tasks.forEach(task => {
|
||||
if (!groups.has(task.parallel_group)) groups.set(task.parallel_group, [])
|
||||
groups.get(task.parallel_group).push(task)
|
||||
})
|
||||
groups.forEach((groupTasks, groupId) => {
|
||||
if (groupTasks.length > 1) {
|
||||
// Tasks in same group should not depend on each other
|
||||
const ids = new Set(groupTasks.map(t => t.id))
|
||||
groupTasks.forEach(task => {
|
||||
task.depends_on.forEach(dep => {
|
||||
if (ids.has(dep)) {
|
||||
errors.push(`Parallel group ${groupId}: ${task.id} depends on ${dep} but both in same group`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
return errors
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate convergence quality
|
||||
function validateConvergence(recordId, convergence) {
|
||||
const errors = []
|
||||
|
||||
// Check criteria are testable (not vague)
|
||||
const vaguePatterns = /正常|正确|好|可以|没问题|works|fine|good|correct/i
|
||||
convergence.criteria.forEach((criterion, i) => {
|
||||
if (vaguePatterns.test(criterion) && criterion.length < 15) {
|
||||
errors.push(`${recordId} criteria[${i}]: Too vague - "${criterion}"`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Check verification is executable
|
||||
if (convergence.verification.length < 10) {
|
||||
errors.push(`${recordId} verification: Too short, needs executable steps`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check definition_of_done is business language
|
||||
const technicalPatterns = /compile|build|lint|npm|npx|jest|tsc|eslint/i
|
||||
if (technicalPatterns.test(convergence.definition_of_done)) {
|
||||
errors.push(`${recordId} definition_of_done: Should be business language, not technical commands`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return errors
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Detect circular dependencies
|
||||
function detectCycles(records, prefix) {
|
||||
const errors = []
|
||||
const graph = new Map(records.map(r => [r.id, r.depends_on]))
|
||||
const visited = new Set()
|
||||
const inStack = new Set()
|
||||
|
||||
function dfs(node, path) {
|
||||
if (inStack.has(node)) {
|
||||
errors.push(`Circular dependency detected: ${[...path, node].join(' → ')}`)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (visited.has(node)) return
|
||||
|
||||
visited.add(node)
|
||||
inStack.add(node)
|
||||
;(graph.get(node) || []).forEach(dep => dfs(dep, [...path, node]))
|
||||
inStack.delete(node)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
records.forEach(r => {
|
||||
if (!visited.has(r.id)) dfs(r.id, [])
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
return errors
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Topological sort
|
||||
function topologicalSort(tasks) {
|
||||
const result = []
|
||||
const visited = new Set()
|
||||
const taskMap = new Map(tasks.map(t => [t.id, t]))
|
||||
|
||||
function visit(taskId) {
|
||||
if (visited.has(taskId)) return
|
||||
visited.add(taskId)
|
||||
const task = taskMap.get(taskId)
|
||||
if (task) {
|
||||
task.depends_on.forEach(dep => visit(dep))
|
||||
result.push(task)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tasks.forEach(t => visit(t.id))
|
||||
return result
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### JSONL & Markdown Generation
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Generate roadmap.jsonl
|
||||
function generateJsonl(records) {
|
||||
return records.map(record => JSON.stringify(record)).join('\n') + '\n'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate roadmap.md for progressive mode
|
||||
function generateProgressiveRoadmapMd(layers, input) {
|
||||
return `# 需求路线图
|
||||
|
||||
**Session**: ${input.session.id}
|
||||
**需求**: ${input.requirement}
|
||||
**策略**: progressive
|
||||
**不确定性**: ${input.strategy_assessment.uncertainty_level}
|
||||
**生成时间**: ${new Date().toISOString()}
|
||||
|
||||
## 策略评估
|
||||
|
||||
- 目标: ${input.strategy_assessment.goal}
|
||||
- 约束: ${input.strategy_assessment.constraints.join(', ') || '无'}
|
||||
- 利益方: ${input.strategy_assessment.stakeholders.join(', ') || '无'}
|
||||
|
||||
## 路线图概览
|
||||
|
||||
| 层级 | 名称 | 目标 | 工作量 | 依赖 |
|
||||
|------|------|------|--------|------|
|
||||
${layers.map(l => `| ${l.id} | ${l.name} | ${l.goal} | ${l.effort} | ${l.depends_on.length ? l.depends_on.join(', ') : '-'} |`).join('\n')}
|
||||
|
||||
## 各层详情
|
||||
|
||||
${layers.map(l => `### ${l.id}: ${l.name}
|
||||
|
||||
**目标**: ${l.goal}
|
||||
|
||||
**范围**: ${l.scope.join('、')}
|
||||
|
||||
**排除**: ${l.excludes.join('、') || '无'}
|
||||
|
||||
**收敛标准**:
|
||||
${l.convergence.criteria.map(c => `- ✅ ${c}`).join('\n')}
|
||||
- 🔍 **验证方法**: ${l.convergence.verification}
|
||||
- 🎯 **完成定义**: ${l.convergence.definition_of_done}
|
||||
|
||||
**风险项**: ${l.risk_items.length ? l.risk_items.map(r => `\n- ⚠️ ${r}`).join('') : '无'}
|
||||
|
||||
**工作量**: ${l.effort}
|
||||
`).join('\n---\n\n')}
|
||||
|
||||
## 风险汇总
|
||||
|
||||
${layers.flatMap(l => l.risk_items.map(r => `- **${l.id}**: ${r}`)).join('\n') || '无已识别风险'}
|
||||
|
||||
## 下一步
|
||||
|
||||
每个层级可独立执行：
|
||||
\`\`\`bash
|
||||
/workflow:lite-plan "${layers[0]?.name}: ${layers[0]?.scope.join(', ')}"
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
路线图 JSONL 文件: \`${input.session.folder}/roadmap.jsonl\`
|
||||
`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate roadmap.md for direct mode
|
||||
function generateDirectRoadmapMd(tasks, input) {
|
||||
return `# 需求路线图
|
||||
|
||||
**Session**: ${input.session.id}
|
||||
**需求**: ${input.requirement}
|
||||
**策略**: direct
|
||||
**生成时间**: ${new Date().toISOString()}
|
||||
|
||||
## 策略评估
|
||||
|
||||
- 目标: ${input.strategy_assessment.goal}
|
||||
- 约束: ${input.strategy_assessment.constraints.join(', ') || '无'}
|
||||
|
||||
## 任务序列
|
||||
|
||||
| 组 | ID | 标题 | 类型 | 依赖 |
|
||||
|----|-----|------|------|------|
|
||||
${tasks.map(t => `| ${t.parallel_group} | ${t.id} | ${t.title} | ${t.type} | ${t.depends_on.length ? t.depends_on.join(', ') : '-'} |`).join('\n')}
|
||||
|
||||
## 各任务详情
|
||||
|
||||
${tasks.map(t => `### ${t.id}: ${t.title}
|
||||
|
||||
**类型**: ${t.type} | **并行组**: ${t.parallel_group}
|
||||
|
||||
**范围**: ${t.scope}
|
||||
|
||||
**输入**: ${t.inputs.length ? t.inputs.join(', ') : '无（起始任务）'}
|
||||
**输出**: ${t.outputs.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
**收敛标准**:
|
||||
${t.convergence.criteria.map(c => `- ✅ ${c}`).join('\n')}
|
||||
- 🔍 **验证方法**: ${t.convergence.verification}
|
||||
- 🎯 **完成定义**: ${t.convergence.definition_of_done}
|
||||
`).join('\n---\n\n')}
|
||||
|
||||
## 下一步
|
||||
|
||||
每个任务可独立执行：
|
||||
\`\`\`bash
|
||||
/workflow:lite-plan "${tasks[0]?.title}: ${tasks[0]?.scope}"
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
路线图 JSONL 文件: \`${input.session.folder}/roadmap.jsonl\`
|
||||
`
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Fallback Decomposition
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Manual decomposition when CLI fails
|
||||
function manualProgressiveDecomposition(requirement, context) {
|
||||
return [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "L0", name: "MVP", goal: "最小可用闭环",
|
||||
scope: ["核心功能"], excludes: ["高级功能", "优化"],
|
||||
convergence: {
|
||||
criteria: ["核心路径端到端可跑通"],
|
||||
verification: "手动测试核心流程",
|
||||
definition_of_done: "用户可完成一次核心操作的完整流程"
|
||||
},
|
||||
risk_items: ["技术选型待验证"], effort: "medium", depends_on: []
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "L1", name: "可用", goal: "关键用户路径完善",
|
||||
scope: ["错误处理", "输入校验"], excludes: ["性能优化", "监控"],
|
||||
convergence: {
|
||||
criteria: ["所有用户输入有校验", "错误场景有提示"],
|
||||
verification: "单元测试 + 手动测试错误场景",
|
||||
definition_of_done: "用户遇到问题时有清晰的引导和恢复路径"
|
||||
},
|
||||
risk_items: [], effort: "medium", depends_on: ["L0"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function manualDirectDecomposition(requirement, context) {
|
||||
return [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "T1", title: "基础设施搭建", type: "infrastructure",
|
||||
scope: "项目骨架和基础配置",
|
||||
inputs: [], outputs: ["project-structure"],
|
||||
convergence: {
|
||||
criteria: ["项目可构建无报错", "基础配置完成"],
|
||||
verification: "npm run build (或对应构建命令)",
|
||||
definition_of_done: "项目基础框架就绪，可开始功能开发"
|
||||
},
|
||||
depends_on: [], parallel_group: 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: "T2", title: "核心功能实现", type: "feature",
|
||||
scope: "核心业务逻辑",
|
||||
inputs: ["project-structure"], outputs: ["core-module"],
|
||||
convergence: {
|
||||
criteria: ["核心 API/功能可调用", "返回预期结果"],
|
||||
verification: "运行核心功能测试",
|
||||
definition_of_done: "核心业务功能可正常使用"
|
||||
},
|
||||
depends_on: ["T1"], parallel_group: 2
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Decomposition Quality Check (MANDATORY)
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
|
||||
After generating roadmap.jsonl, **MUST** execute CLI quality check before returning to orchestrator.
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | Check Criteria | Critical? |
|
||||
|-----------|---------------|-----------|
|
||||
| **Requirement Coverage** | All aspects of original requirement addressed in layers/tasks | Yes |
|
||||
| **Convergence Quality** | criteria testable, verification executable, DoD business-readable | Yes |
|
||||
| **Scope Integrity** | Progressive: no overlap/gaps; Direct: inputs/outputs chain valid | Yes |
|
||||
| **Dependency Correctness** | No circular deps, proper ordering | Yes |
|
||||
| **Effort Balance** | No single layer/task disproportionately large | No |
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Quality Check Command
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Validate roadmap decomposition quality
|
||||
Success: All quality dimensions pass
|
||||
|
||||
ORIGINAL REQUIREMENT:
|
||||
${requirement}
|
||||
|
||||
ROADMAP (${selected_mode} mode):
|
||||
${roadmapJsonlContent}
|
||||
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Requirement Coverage: Does the roadmap address ALL aspects of the requirement?
|
||||
• Convergence Quality: Are criteria testable? Is verification executable? Is DoD business-readable?
|
||||
• Scope Integrity: ${selected_mode === 'progressive' ? 'No scope overlap between layers, no feature gaps' : 'Inputs/outputs chain is valid, parallel groups are correct'}
|
||||
• Dependency Correctness: No circular dependencies
|
||||
• Effort Balance: No disproportionately large items
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
EXPECTED:
|
||||
## Quality Check Results
|
||||
### Requirement Coverage: PASS|FAIL
|
||||
[details]
|
||||
### Convergence Quality: PASS|FAIL
|
||||
[details and specific issues per record]
|
||||
### Scope Integrity: PASS|FAIL
|
||||
[details]
|
||||
### Dependency Correctness: PASS|FAIL
|
||||
[details]
|
||||
### Effort Balance: PASS|FAIL
|
||||
[details]
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendation: PASS|AUTO_FIX|NEEDS_REVIEW
|
||||
## Fixes (if AUTO_FIX):
|
||||
[specific fixes as JSON patches]
|
||||
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only validation, do not modify files
|
||||
" --tool ${cli_config.tool} --mode analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Auto-Fix Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
| Issue Type | Auto-Fix Action |
|
||||
|-----------|----------------|
|
||||
| Vague criteria | Replace with specific, testable conditions |
|
||||
| Technical DoD | Rewrite in business language |
|
||||
| Missing scope items | Add to appropriate layer/task |
|
||||
| Effort imbalance | Suggest split (report to orchestrator) |
|
||||
|
||||
After fixes, update `roadmap.jsonl` and `roadmap.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Fallback chain: Gemini → Qwen → manual decomposition
|
||||
try {
|
||||
result = executeCLI(cli_config.tool, prompt)
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
result = executeCLI(cli_config.fallback, prompt)
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
// Manual fallback
|
||||
records = selected_mode === 'progressive'
|
||||
? manualProgressiveDecomposition(requirement, exploration_context)
|
||||
: manualDirectDecomposition(requirement, exploration_context)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
- Parse CLI output into structured records with full convergence fields
|
||||
- Validate all records against schema before writing JSONL
|
||||
- Check for circular dependencies
|
||||
- Ensure convergence criteria are testable (not vague)
|
||||
- Ensure verification is executable (commands or explicit steps)
|
||||
- Ensure definition_of_done uses business language
|
||||
- Run Phase 5 quality check before returning
|
||||
- Write both roadmap.jsonl AND roadmap.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
- Output vague convergence criteria ("works correctly", "系统正常")
|
||||
- Create circular dependencies
|
||||
- Skip convergence validation
|
||||
- Skip Phase 5 quality check
|
||||
- Return without writing both output files
|
||||
@@ -24,12 +24,9 @@ You are a code execution specialist focused on implementing high-quality, produc
|
||||
- **Context-driven** - Use provided context and existing code patterns
|
||||
- **Quality over speed** - Write boring, reliable code that works
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Task Status: Mark In Progress
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
jq --arg ts "$(date -Iseconds)" '.status="in_progress" | .status_history += [{"from":.status,"to":"in_progress","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Context Assessment
|
||||
**Input Sources**:
|
||||
@@ -38,128 +35,58 @@ jq --arg ts "$(date -Iseconds)" '.status="in_progress" | .status_history += [{"f
|
||||
- Project CLAUDE.md standards
|
||||
- **context-package.json** (when available in workflow tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Package** :
|
||||
`context-package.json` provides artifact paths - read using Read tool or ccw session:
|
||||
**Context Package** (CCW Workflow):
|
||||
`context-package.json` provides artifact paths - extract dynamically using `jq`:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Get context package content from session using Read tool
|
||||
Read(.workflow/active/${SESSION_ID}/.process/context-package.json)
|
||||
# Returns parsed JSON with brainstorm_artifacts, focus_paths, etc.
|
||||
# Get role analysis paths from context package
|
||||
jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path' context-package.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task JSON Parsing** (when task JSON path provided):
|
||||
Read task JSON and extract structured context:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Task JSON Fields:
|
||||
├── context.requirements[] → What to implement (list of requirements)
|
||||
├── context.acceptance[] → How to verify (validation commands)
|
||||
├── context.focus_paths[] → Where to focus (directories/files)
|
||||
├── context.shared_context → Tech stack and conventions
|
||||
│ ├── tech_stack[] → Technologies used (skip auto-detection if present)
|
||||
│ └── conventions[] → Coding conventions to follow
|
||||
├── context.artifacts[] → Additional context sources
|
||||
└── flow_control → Execution instructions
|
||||
├── pre_analysis[] → Context gathering steps (execute first)
|
||||
├── implementation_approach[] → Implementation steps (execute sequentially)
|
||||
└── target_files[] → Files to create/modify
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Parsing Priority**:
|
||||
1. Read task JSON from provided path
|
||||
2. Extract `context.requirements` as implementation goals
|
||||
3. Extract `context.acceptance` as verification criteria
|
||||
4. If `context.shared_context.tech_stack` exists → skip auto-detection, use provided stack
|
||||
5. Process `flow_control` if present
|
||||
|
||||
**Pre-Analysis: Smart Tech Stack Loading**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Priority 1: Use tech_stack from task JSON if available
|
||||
if [[ -n "$TASK_JSON_TECH_STACK" ]]; then
|
||||
# Map tech stack names to guideline files
|
||||
# e.g., ["FastAPI", "SQLAlchemy"] → python-dev.md
|
||||
case "$TASK_JSON_TECH_STACK" in
|
||||
*FastAPI*|*Django*|*SQLAlchemy*) TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/python-dev.md) ;;
|
||||
*React*|*Next*) TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/react-dev.md) ;;
|
||||
*TypeScript*) TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/typescript-dev.md) ;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
# Priority 2: Auto-detect from file extensions (fallback)
|
||||
elif [[ "$TASK_DESCRIPTION" =~ (implement|create|build|develop|code|write|add|fix|refactor) ]]; then
|
||||
# Smart detection: Only load tech stack for development tasks
|
||||
if [[ "$TASK_DESCRIPTION" =~ (implement|create|build|develop|code|write|add|fix|refactor) ]]; then
|
||||
# Simple tech stack detection based on file extensions
|
||||
if ls *.ts *.tsx 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/typescript-dev.md)
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/typescript-dev.md)
|
||||
elif grep -q "react" package.json 2>/dev/null; then
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/react-dev.md)
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/react-dev.md)
|
||||
elif ls *.py requirements.txt 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/python-dev.md)
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/python-dev.md)
|
||||
elif ls *.java pom.xml build.gradle 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/java-dev.md)
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/java-dev.md)
|
||||
elif ls *.go go.mod 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/go-dev.md)
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/go-dev.md)
|
||||
elif ls *.js package.json 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/javascript-dev.md)
|
||||
TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/javascript-dev.md)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Evaluation**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
STEP 1: Parse Task JSON (if path provided)
|
||||
→ Read task JSON file from provided path
|
||||
→ Extract and store in memory:
|
||||
• [requirements] ← context.requirements[]
|
||||
• [acceptance_criteria] ← context.acceptance[]
|
||||
• [tech_stack] ← context.shared_context.tech_stack[] (skip auto-detection if present)
|
||||
• [conventions] ← context.shared_context.conventions[]
|
||||
• [focus_paths] ← context.focus_paths[]
|
||||
IF task is development-related (implement|create|build|develop|code|write|add|fix|refactor):
|
||||
→ Execute smart tech stack detection and load guidelines into [tech_guidelines] variable
|
||||
→ All subsequent development must follow loaded tech stack principles
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
→ Skip tech stack loading for non-development tasks
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 2: Execute Pre-Analysis (if flow_control.pre_analysis exists in Task JSON)
|
||||
→ Execute each pre_analysis step sequentially
|
||||
→ Store each step's output in memory using output_to variable name
|
||||
→ These variables are available for STEP 3
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3: Execute Implementation (choose one path)
|
||||
IF flow_control.implementation_approach exists:
|
||||
→ Follow implementation_approach steps sequentially
|
||||
→ Substitute [variable_name] placeholders with stored values BEFORE execution
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
→ Use [requirements] as implementation goals
|
||||
→ Use [conventions] as coding guidelines
|
||||
→ Modify files in [focus_paths]
|
||||
→ Verify against [acceptance_criteria] on completion
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Pre-Analysis Execution** (flow_control.pre_analysis):
|
||||
```
|
||||
For each step in pre_analysis[]:
|
||||
step.step → Step identifier (string name)
|
||||
step.action → Description of what to do
|
||||
step.commands → Array of commands to execute (see Command-to-Tool Mapping)
|
||||
step.output_to → Variable name to store results in memory
|
||||
step.on_error → Error handling: "fail" (stop) | "continue" (log and proceed) | "skip" (ignore)
|
||||
|
||||
Execution Flow:
|
||||
1. For each step in order:
|
||||
2. For each command in step.commands[]:
|
||||
3. Parse command format → Map to actual tool
|
||||
4. Execute tool → Capture output
|
||||
5. Concatenate all outputs → Store in [step.output_to] variable
|
||||
6. Continue to next step (or handle error per on_error)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Command-to-Tool Mapping** (explicit tool bindings):
|
||||
```
|
||||
Command Format → Actual Tool Call
|
||||
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
"Read(path)" → Read tool: Read(file_path=path)
|
||||
"bash(command)" → Bash tool: Bash(command=command)
|
||||
"Search(pattern,path)" → Grep tool: Grep(pattern=pattern, path=path)
|
||||
"Glob(pattern)" → Glob tool: Glob(pattern=pattern)
|
||||
"mcp__xxx__yyy(args)" → MCP tool: mcp__xxx__yyy(args)
|
||||
|
||||
Example Parsing:
|
||||
"Read(backend/app/models/simulation.py)"
|
||||
→ Tool: Read
|
||||
→ Parameter: file_path = "backend/app/models/simulation.py"
|
||||
→ Execute: Read(file_path="backend/app/models/simulation.py")
|
||||
→ Store output in [output_to] variable
|
||||
IF context sufficient for implementation:
|
||||
→ Apply [tech_guidelines] if loaded, otherwise use general best practices
|
||||
→ Proceed with implementation
|
||||
ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
|
||||
→ Check for [FLOW_CONTROL] marker:
|
||||
- Execute flow_control.pre_analysis steps sequentially for context gathering
|
||||
- Use four flexible context acquisition methods:
|
||||
* Document references (cat commands)
|
||||
* Search commands (grep/rg/find)
|
||||
* CLI analysis (gemini/codex)
|
||||
* Free exploration (Read/Grep/Search tools)
|
||||
- Pass context between steps via [variable_name] references
|
||||
- Include [tech_guidelines] in context if available
|
||||
→ Extract patterns and conventions from accumulated context
|
||||
→ Apply tech stack principles if guidelines were loaded
|
||||
→ Proceed with execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
### Module Verification Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -176,146 +103,29 @@ Example Parsing:
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Approach Execution**:
|
||||
When task JSON contains `flow_control.implementation_approach` array:
|
||||
1. **Sequential Processing**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
|
||||
2. **Dependency Resolution**: Wait for all steps listed in `depends_on` before starting
|
||||
3. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
|
||||
4. **Step Structure**:
|
||||
- `step`: Unique identifier (1, 2, 3...)
|
||||
- `title`: Step title
|
||||
- `description`: Detailed description with variable references
|
||||
- `modification_points`: Code modification targets
|
||||
- `logic_flow`: Business logic sequence
|
||||
- `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
|
||||
- `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
|
||||
- `output`: Variable name for this step's output
|
||||
5. **Execution Rules**:
|
||||
- Execute step 1 first (typically has `depends_on: []`)
|
||||
- For each subsequent step, verify all `depends_on` steps completed
|
||||
- Substitute `[variable_name]` with actual outputs from previous steps
|
||||
- Store this step's result in the `output` variable for future steps
|
||||
- If `command` field present, execute it; otherwise use agent capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Step Structure**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
step → Unique identifier (1, 2, 3...)
|
||||
title → Step title for logging
|
||||
description → What to implement (may contain [variable_name] placeholders)
|
||||
modification_points → Specific code changes required (files to create/modify)
|
||||
logic_flow → Business logic sequence to implement
|
||||
command → (Optional) CLI command to execute
|
||||
depends_on → Array of step numbers that must complete first
|
||||
output → Variable name to store this step's result
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Flow**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
// Read task-level execution config (Single Source of Truth)
|
||||
const executionMethod = task.meta?.execution_config?.method || 'agent';
|
||||
const cliTool = task.meta?.execution_config?.cli_tool || getDefaultCliTool(); // See ~/.claude/cli-tools.json
|
||||
|
||||
// Phase 1: Execute pre_analysis (always by Agent)
|
||||
const preAnalysisResults = {};
|
||||
for (const step of task.flow_control.pre_analysis || []) {
|
||||
const result = executePreAnalysisStep(step);
|
||||
preAnalysisResults[step.output_to] = result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Phase 2: Determine execution mode (based on task.meta.execution_config.method)
|
||||
// Two modes: 'cli' (call CLI tool) or 'agent' (execute directly)
|
||||
|
||||
IF executionMethod === 'cli':
|
||||
// CLI Handoff: Full context passed to CLI via buildCliHandoffPrompt
|
||||
→ const cliPrompt = buildCliHandoffPrompt(preAnalysisResults, task, taskJsonPath)
|
||||
→ const cliCommand = buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt)
|
||||
→ Bash({ command: cliCommand, run_in_background: false, timeout: 3600000 })
|
||||
|
||||
ELSE (executionMethod === 'agent'):
|
||||
// Execute implementation steps directly
|
||||
FOR each step in implementation_approach[]:
|
||||
1. Variable Substitution: Replace [variable_name] with preAnalysisResults
|
||||
2. Read modification_points[] as files to create/modify
|
||||
3. Read logic_flow[] as implementation sequence
|
||||
4. For each file in modification_points:
|
||||
• If "Create new file: path" → Use Write tool
|
||||
• If "Modify file: path" → Use Edit tool
|
||||
• If "Add to file: path" → Use Edit tool (append)
|
||||
5. Follow logic_flow sequence
|
||||
6. Use [focus_paths] from context as working directory scope
|
||||
7. Store result in [step.output] variable
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI Handoff Functions**:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Get default CLI tool from cli-tools.json
|
||||
function getDefaultCliTool() {
|
||||
// Read ~/.claude/cli-tools.json and return first enabled tool
|
||||
// Fallback order: gemini → qwen → codex (first enabled in config)
|
||||
return firstEnabledTool || 'gemini'; // System default fallback
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Build CLI prompt from pre-analysis results and task
|
||||
function buildCliHandoffPrompt(preAnalysisResults, task, taskJsonPath) {
|
||||
const contextSection = Object.entries(preAnalysisResults)
|
||||
.map(([key, value]) => `### ${key}\n${value}`)
|
||||
.join('\n\n');
|
||||
|
||||
const conventions = task.context.shared_context?.conventions?.join(' | ') || '';
|
||||
const constraints = `Follow existing patterns | No breaking changes${conventions ? ' | ' + conventions : ''}`;
|
||||
|
||||
return `
|
||||
PURPOSE: ${task.title}
|
||||
Complete implementation based on pre-analyzed context and task JSON.
|
||||
|
||||
## TASK JSON
|
||||
Read full task definition: ${taskJsonPath}
|
||||
|
||||
## TECH STACK
|
||||
${task.context.shared_context?.tech_stack?.map(t => `- ${t}`).join('\n') || 'Auto-detect from project files'}
|
||||
|
||||
## PRE-ANALYSIS CONTEXT
|
||||
${contextSection}
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUIREMENTS
|
||||
${task.context.requirements?.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n') || task.context.requirements}
|
||||
|
||||
## ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
|
||||
${task.context.acceptance?.map(a => `- ${a}`).join('\n') || task.context.acceptance}
|
||||
|
||||
## TARGET FILES
|
||||
${task.flow_control.target_files?.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n') || 'See task JSON modification_points'}
|
||||
|
||||
## FOCUS PATHS
|
||||
${task.context.focus_paths?.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n') || 'See task JSON'}
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: ${constraints}
|
||||
`.trim();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Build CLI command with resume strategy
|
||||
function buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt) {
|
||||
const cli = task.cli_execution || {};
|
||||
const escapedPrompt = cliPrompt.replace(/"/g, '\\"');
|
||||
const baseCmd = `ccw cli -p "${escapedPrompt}"`;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (cli.strategy) {
|
||||
case 'new':
|
||||
return `${baseCmd} --tool ${cliTool} --mode write --id ${task.cli_execution_id}`;
|
||||
case 'resume':
|
||||
return `${baseCmd} --resume ${cli.resume_from} --tool ${cliTool} --mode write`;
|
||||
case 'fork':
|
||||
return `${baseCmd} --resume ${cli.resume_from} --id ${task.cli_execution_id} --tool ${cliTool} --mode write`;
|
||||
case 'merge_fork':
|
||||
return `${baseCmd} --resume ${cli.merge_from.join(',')} --id ${task.cli_execution_id} --tool ${cliTool} --mode write`;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
// Fallback: no resume, no id
|
||||
return `${baseCmd} --tool ${cliTool} --mode write`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Config Reference** (from task.meta.execution_config):
|
||||
| Field | Values | Description |
|
||||
|-------|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `method` | `agent` / `cli` | Execution mode (default: agent) |
|
||||
| `cli_tool` | See `~/.claude/cli-tools.json` | CLI tool preference (first enabled tool as default) |
|
||||
| `enable_resume` | `true` / `false` | Enable CLI session resume |
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI Execution Reference** (from task.cli_execution):
|
||||
| Field | Values | Description |
|
||||
|-------|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| `strategy` | `new` / `resume` / `fork` / `merge_fork` | Resume strategy |
|
||||
| `resume_from` | `{session}-{task_id}` | Parent task CLI ID (resume/fork) |
|
||||
| `merge_from` | `[{id1}, {id2}]` | Parent task CLI IDs (merge_fork) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Resume Strategy Examples**:
|
||||
- **New task** (no dependencies): `--id WFS-001-IMPL-001`
|
||||
- **Resume** (single dependency, single child): `--resume WFS-001-IMPL-001`
|
||||
- **Fork** (single dependency, multiple children): `--resume WFS-001-IMPL-001 --id WFS-001-IMPL-002`
|
||||
- **Merge** (multiple dependencies): `--resume WFS-001-IMPL-001,WFS-001-IMPL-002 --id WFS-001-IMPL-003`
|
||||
**CLI Command Execution (CLI Execute Mode)**:
|
||||
When step contains `command` field with Codex CLI, execute via Bash tool. For Codex resume:
|
||||
- First task (`depends_on: []`): `codex -C [path] --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
|
||||
- Subsequent tasks (has `depends_on`): Add `resume --last` flag to maintain session context
|
||||
|
||||
**Test-Driven Development**:
|
||||
- Write tests first (red → green → refactor)
|
||||
@@ -349,18 +159,12 @@ function buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt) {
|
||||
|
||||
**Upon completing any task:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify Implementation**:
|
||||
1. **Verify Implementation**:
|
||||
- Code compiles and runs
|
||||
- All tests pass
|
||||
- Functionality works as specified
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update Task JSON Status**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Mark task as completed (run in task directory)
|
||||
jq --arg ts "$(date -Iseconds)" '.status="completed" | .status_history += [{"from":"in_progress","to":"completed","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Update TODO List**:
|
||||
2. **Update TODO List**:
|
||||
- Update TODO_LIST.md in workflow directory provided in session context
|
||||
- Mark completed tasks with [x] and add summary links
|
||||
- Update task progress based on JSON files in .task/ directory
|
||||
@@ -493,16 +297,7 @@ Before completing any task, verify:
|
||||
- Make assumptions - verify with existing code
|
||||
- Create unnecessary complexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool (CLI Execution in Agent)**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls - agent cannot receive task hook callbacks
|
||||
- Set timeout ≥60 minutes for CLI commands (hooks don't propagate to subagents):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Bash(command="ccw cli -p '...' --tool <cli-tool> --mode write", timeout=3600000) // 60 min
|
||||
// <cli-tool>: First enabled tool from ~/.claude/cli-tools.json (e.g., gemini, qwen, codex)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS:**
|
||||
- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
- Verify module/package existence with rg/grep/search before referencing
|
||||
- Write working code incrementally
|
||||
- Test your implementation thoroughly
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ You are a conceptual planning specialist focused on **dedicated single-role** st
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Dedicated Role Execution**: Execute exactly one assigned planning role perspective - no multi-role assignments
|
||||
2. **Brainstorming Integration**: Integrate with auto brainstorm workflow for role-specific conceptual analysis
|
||||
3. **Template-Driven Analysis**: Use planning role templates loaded via `$(cat template)`
|
||||
@@ -70,7 +68,7 @@ def handle_brainstorm_assignment(prompt):
|
||||
|
||||
# Execute role template loading via $(cat template)
|
||||
if step_name == "load_role_template":
|
||||
processed_command = f"bash($(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md))"
|
||||
processed_command = f"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md))"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
processed_command = process_context_variables(command, context_vars)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -106,12 +104,12 @@ This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm
|
||||
|
||||
2. **load_role_template**
|
||||
- Action: Load role-specific planning template
|
||||
- Command: bash($(cat "~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
|
||||
- Command: bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
|
||||
- Output: role_template
|
||||
|
||||
3. **load_session_metadata**
|
||||
- Action: Load session metadata
|
||||
- Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
|
||||
- Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
|
||||
- Output: session_metadata
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -121,6 +119,17 @@ This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm
|
||||
- No dependency management
|
||||
- Used for temporary context preparation
|
||||
|
||||
### NOT Handled by This Agent
|
||||
|
||||
**JSON format** (used by code-developer, test-fix-agent):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [...],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [...]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This complete JSON format is stored in `.task/IMPL-*.json` files and handled by implementation agents, not conceptual-planning-agent.
|
||||
|
||||
### Role-Specific Analysis Dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -137,14 +146,14 @@ This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini Analysis Integration**: Pattern-based analysis results are integrated into role output documents:
|
||||
- Enhanced analysis documents with codebase insights and architectural patterns
|
||||
**Gemini Analysis Integration**: Pattern-based analysis results are integrated into the single role's output:
|
||||
- Enhanced `analysis.md` with codebase insights and architectural patterns
|
||||
- Role-specific technical recommendations based on existing conventions
|
||||
- Pattern-based best practices from actual code examination
|
||||
- Realistic feasibility assessments based on current implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex Analysis Integration**: Autonomous analysis results provide comprehensive insights:
|
||||
- Enhanced analysis documents with autonomous development recommendations
|
||||
- Enhanced `analysis.md` with autonomous development recommendations
|
||||
- Role-specific strategy based on intelligent system understanding
|
||||
- Autonomous development approaches and implementation guidance
|
||||
- Self-guided optimization and integration recommendations
|
||||
@@ -157,7 +166,7 @@ When called, you receive:
|
||||
- **User Context**: Specific requirements, constraints, and expectations from user discussion
|
||||
- **Output Location**: Directory path for generated analysis files
|
||||
- **Role Hint** (optional): Suggested role or role selection guidance
|
||||
- **context-package.json** : Artifact paths catalog - use Read tool to get context package from `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
|
||||
- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Artifact paths catalog - extract using `jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path'`
|
||||
- **ASSIGNED_ROLE** (optional): Specific role assignment
|
||||
- **ANALYSIS_DIMENSIONS** (optional): Role-specific analysis dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -165,7 +174,7 @@ When called, you receive:
|
||||
**Auto Brainstorm Integration**: Role assignment comes from auto.md workflow:
|
||||
1. **Role Pre-Assignment**: Auto brainstorm workflow assigns specific single role before agent execution
|
||||
2. **Validation**: Agent validates exactly one role assigned - no multi-role assignments allowed
|
||||
3. **Template Loading**: Use `$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<assigned-role>.md)` for role template
|
||||
3. **Template Loading**: Use `$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<assigned-role>.md)` for role template
|
||||
4. **Output Directory**: Use designated `.brainstorming/[role]/` directory for role-specific outputs
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Options Include:
|
||||
@@ -190,7 +199,7 @@ When called, you receive:
|
||||
### Role Template Integration
|
||||
Documentation formats and structures are defined in role-specific templates loaded via:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
$(cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<assigned-role>.md)
|
||||
$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<assigned-role>.md)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Each planning role template contains:
|
||||
@@ -220,23 +229,26 @@ Generate documents according to loaded role template specifications:
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Location**: `.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[assigned-role]/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Files**:
|
||||
- **analysis.md**: Index document with overview (optionally with `@` references to sub-documents)
|
||||
**Required Files**:
|
||||
- **analysis.md**: Main role perspective analysis incorporating user context and role template
|
||||
- **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
|
||||
- **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
|
||||
- **analysis-{slug}.md**: Section content documents (slug from section heading: lowercase, hyphens)
|
||||
- Maximum 5 sub-documents (merge related sections if needed)
|
||||
- **Content**: Analysis AND recommendations sections
|
||||
- **Auto-split if large**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md)
|
||||
- **Content**: Includes both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
|
||||
- **[role-deliverables]/**: Directory for specialized role outputs as defined in planning role template (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
**File Structure Example**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/
|
||||
├── analysis.md # Index with overview + @references
|
||||
├── analysis-architecture-assessment.md # Section content
|
||||
├── analysis-technology-evaluation.md # Section content
|
||||
├── analysis-integration-strategy.md # Section content
|
||||
└── analysis-recommendations.md # Section content (max 5 sub-docs total)
|
||||
├── analysis.md # Main system architecture analysis with recommendations
|
||||
├── analysis-1.md # (Optional) Continuation if content >800 lines
|
||||
└── deliverables/ # (Optional) Additional role-specific outputs
|
||||
├── technical-architecture.md # System design specifications
|
||||
├── technology-stack.md # Technology selection rationale
|
||||
└── scalability-plan.md # Scaling strategy
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: ALL files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix. Max 5 sub-documents.
|
||||
NOTE: ALL brainstorming output files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix
|
||||
FORBIDDEN: recommendations.md, recommendations-*.md, or any non-'analysis' prefixed files
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Role-Specific Planning Process
|
||||
@@ -256,10 +268,14 @@ NOTE: ALL files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix. Max 5 sub-documents.
|
||||
- **Validate Against Template**: Ensure analysis meets role template requirements and standards
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Brainstorming Documentation Phase
|
||||
- **Create analysis.md**: Main document with overview (optionally with `@` references)
|
||||
- **Create sub-documents**: `analysis-{slug}.md` for major sections (max 5)
|
||||
- **Create analysis.md**: Generate comprehensive role perspective analysis in designated output directory
|
||||
- **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
|
||||
- **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
|
||||
- **Content**: Include both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
|
||||
- **Auto-split**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files total)
|
||||
- **Generate Role Deliverables**: Create specialized outputs as defined in planning role template (optional)
|
||||
- **Validate Output Structure**: Ensure all files saved to correct `.brainstorming/[role]/` directory
|
||||
- **Naming Validation**: Verify ALL files start with `analysis` prefix
|
||||
- **Naming Validation**: Verify NO files with `recommendations` prefix exist
|
||||
- **Quality Review**: Ensure outputs meet role template standards and user requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## Role-Specific Analysis Framework
|
||||
@@ -308,14 +324,5 @@ When analysis is complete, ensure:
|
||||
- **Relevance**: Directly addresses user's specified requirements
|
||||
- **Actionability**: Provides concrete next steps and recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Size Limits
|
||||
|
||||
**Per-role limits** (prevent context overflow):
|
||||
- `analysis.md`: < 3000 words
|
||||
- `analysis-*.md`: < 2000 words each (max 5 sub-documents)
|
||||
- Total: < 15000 words per role
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategies**: Be concise, use bullet points, reference don't repeat, prioritize top 3-5 items, defer details
|
||||
|
||||
**If exceeded**: Split essential vs nice-to-have, move extras to `analysis-appendix.md` (counts toward limit), use executive summary style
|
||||
|
||||
### Windows Path Format Guidelines
|
||||
- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ You are a context discovery specialist focused on gathering relevant project inf
|
||||
### 1. Reference Documentation (Project Standards)
|
||||
**Tools**:
|
||||
- `Read()` - Load CLAUDE.md, README.md, architecture docs
|
||||
- `Bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')` - Project structure
|
||||
- `Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)` - Project structure
|
||||
- `Glob()` - Find documentation files
|
||||
|
||||
**Use**: Phase 0 foundation setup
|
||||
@@ -44,19 +44,19 @@ You are a context discovery specialist focused on gathering relevant project inf
|
||||
**Use**: Unfamiliar APIs/libraries/patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Existing Code Discovery
|
||||
**Primary (CCW CodexLens MCP)**:
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="init", path=".")` - Initialize index for directory
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search", query="pattern", path=".")` - Content search (requires query)
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search_files", query="pattern")` - File name search, returns paths only (requires query)
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="symbol", file="path")` - Extract all symbols from file (no query, returns functions/classes/variables)
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="update", files=[...])` - Update index for specific files
|
||||
**Primary (Code-Index MCP)**:
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__set_project_path()` - Initialize index
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - File pattern matching
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Content search
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary()` - File structure analysis
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()` - Update index
|
||||
|
||||
**Fallback (CLI)**:
|
||||
- `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast content search
|
||||
- `find` - File discovery
|
||||
- `Grep` - Pattern matching
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority**: CodexLens MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
|
||||
**Priority**: Code-Index MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
|
||||
|
||||
## Simplified Execution Process (3 Phases)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -77,11 +77,12 @@ if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
|
||||
|
||||
**1.2 Foundation Setup**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// 1. Initialize CodexLens (if available)
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "init", path: "." })
|
||||
// 1. Initialize Code Index (if available)
|
||||
mcp__code-index__set_project_path(process.cwd())
|
||||
mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Project Structure
|
||||
bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')
|
||||
bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Load Documentation (if not in memory)
|
||||
if (!memory.has("CLAUDE.md")) Read(CLAUDE.md)
|
||||
@@ -99,87 +100,7 @@ if (!memory.has("README.md")) Read(README.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
Execute all tracks in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: Historical archive analysis (querying `.workflow/archives/manifest.json`) is optional and should be performed if the manifest exists. Inject findings into `conflict_detection.historical_conflicts[]`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Track 0: Exploration Synthesis (Optional)
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger**: When `explorations-manifest.json` exists in session `.process/` folder
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Transform raw exploration data into prioritized, deduplicated insights. This is NOT simple aggregation - it synthesizes `critical_files` (priority-ranked), deduplicates patterns/integration_points, and generates `conflict_indicators`.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Check for exploration results from context-gather parallel explore phase
|
||||
const manifestPath = `.workflow/active/${session_id}/.process/explorations-manifest.json`;
|
||||
if (file_exists(manifestPath)) {
|
||||
const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(manifestPath));
|
||||
|
||||
// Load full exploration data from each file
|
||||
const explorationData = manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
|
||||
...exp,
|
||||
data: JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// Build explorations array with summaries
|
||||
const explorations = explorationData.map(exp => ({
|
||||
angle: exp.angle,
|
||||
file: exp.file,
|
||||
path: exp.path,
|
||||
index: exp.data._metadata?.exploration_index || exp.index,
|
||||
summary: {
|
||||
relevant_files_count: exp.data.relevant_files?.length || 0,
|
||||
key_patterns: exp.data.patterns,
|
||||
integration_points: exp.data.integration_points
|
||||
}
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// SYNTHESIS (not aggregation): Transform raw data into prioritized insights
|
||||
const aggregated_insights = {
|
||||
// CRITICAL: Synthesize priority-ranked critical_files from multiple relevant_files lists
|
||||
// - Deduplicate by path
|
||||
// - Rank by: mention count across angles + individual relevance scores
|
||||
// - Top 10-15 files only (focused, actionable)
|
||||
critical_files: synthesizeCriticalFiles(explorationData.flatMap(e => e.data.relevant_files || [])),
|
||||
|
||||
// SYNTHESIS: Generate conflict indicators from pattern mismatches, constraint violations
|
||||
conflict_indicators: synthesizeConflictIndicators(explorationData),
|
||||
|
||||
// Deduplicate clarification questions (merge similar questions)
|
||||
clarification_needs: deduplicateQuestions(explorationData.flatMap(e => e.data.clarification_needs || [])),
|
||||
|
||||
// Preserve source attribution for traceability
|
||||
constraints: explorationData.map(e => ({ constraint: e.data.constraints, source_angle: e.angle })).filter(c => c.constraint),
|
||||
|
||||
// Deduplicate patterns across angles (merge identical patterns)
|
||||
all_patterns: deduplicatePatterns(explorationData.map(e => ({ patterns: e.data.patterns, source_angle: e.angle }))),
|
||||
|
||||
// Deduplicate integration points (merge by file:line location)
|
||||
all_integration_points: deduplicateIntegrationPoints(explorationData.map(e => ({ points: e.data.integration_points, source_angle: e.angle })))
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Store for Phase 3 packaging
|
||||
exploration_results = { manifest_path: manifestPath, exploration_count: manifest.exploration_count,
|
||||
complexity: manifest.complexity, angles: manifest.angles_explored,
|
||||
explorations, aggregated_insights };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Synthesis helper functions (conceptual)
|
||||
function synthesizeCriticalFiles(allRelevantFiles) {
|
||||
// 1. Group by path
|
||||
// 2. Count mentions across angles
|
||||
// 3. Average relevance scores
|
||||
// 4. Rank by: (mention_count * 0.6) + (avg_relevance * 0.4)
|
||||
// 5. Return top 10-15 with mentioned_by_angles attribution
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function synthesizeConflictIndicators(explorationData) {
|
||||
// 1. Detect pattern mismatches across angles
|
||||
// 2. Identify constraint violations
|
||||
// 3. Flag files mentioned with conflicting integration approaches
|
||||
// 4. Assign severity: critical/high/medium/low
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
Execute all 3 tracks in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Track 1: Reference Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -211,18 +132,18 @@ mcp__exa__web_search_exa({
|
||||
|
||||
**Layer 1: File Pattern Discovery**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Primary: CodexLens MCP
|
||||
const files = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "*{keyword}*" })
|
||||
// Primary: Code-Index MCP
|
||||
const files = mcp__code-index__find_files("*{keyword}*")
|
||||
// Fallback: find . -iname "*{keyword}*" -type f
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Layer 2: Content Search**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Primary: CodexLens MCP
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
|
||||
action: "search",
|
||||
query: "{keyword}",
|
||||
path: "."
|
||||
// Primary: Code-Index MCP
|
||||
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
|
||||
pattern: "{keyword}",
|
||||
file_pattern: "*.ts",
|
||||
output_mode: "files_with_matches"
|
||||
})
|
||||
// Fallback: rg "{keyword}" -t ts --files-with-matches
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -230,10 +151,11 @@ mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
|
||||
**Layer 3: Semantic Patterns**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Find definitions (class, interface, function)
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
|
||||
action: "search",
|
||||
query: "^(export )?(class|interface|type|function) .*{keyword}",
|
||||
path: "."
|
||||
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
|
||||
pattern: "^(export )?(class|interface|type|function) .*{keyword}",
|
||||
regex: true,
|
||||
output_mode: "content",
|
||||
context_lines: 2
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -241,22 +163,21 @@ mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Get file summaries for imports/exports
|
||||
for (const file of discovered_files) {
|
||||
const summary = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "symbol", file: file })
|
||||
// summary: {symbols: [{name, type, line}]}
|
||||
const summary = mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file)
|
||||
// summary: {imports, functions, classes, line_count}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Layer 5: Config & Tests**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Config files
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "*.config.*" })
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "package.json" })
|
||||
mcp__code-index__find_files("*.config.*")
|
||||
mcp__code-index__find_files("package.json")
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
|
||||
action: "search",
|
||||
query: "(describe|it|test).*{keyword}",
|
||||
path: "."
|
||||
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
|
||||
pattern: "(describe|it|test).*{keyword}",
|
||||
file_pattern: "*.{test,spec}.*"
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -448,12 +369,7 @@ Calculate risk level based on:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"path": "system-architect/analysis.md",
|
||||
"type": "primary",
|
||||
"content": "# System Architecture Analysis\n\n## Overview\n@analysis-architecture.md\n@analysis-recommendations.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"path": "system-architect/analysis-architecture.md",
|
||||
"type": "supplementary",
|
||||
"content": "# Architecture Assessment\n\n..."
|
||||
"content": "# System Architecture Analysis\n\n## Overview\n..."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -475,40 +391,33 @@ Calculate risk level based on:
|
||||
},
|
||||
"affected_modules": ["auth", "user-model", "middleware"],
|
||||
"mitigation_strategy": "Incremental refactoring with backward compatibility"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"exploration_results": {
|
||||
"manifest_path": ".workflow/active/{session}/.process/explorations-manifest.json",
|
||||
"exploration_count": 3,
|
||||
"complexity": "Medium",
|
||||
"angles": ["architecture", "dependencies", "testing"],
|
||||
"explorations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"angle": "architecture",
|
||||
"file": "exploration-architecture.json",
|
||||
"path": ".workflow/active/{session}/.process/exploration-architecture.json",
|
||||
"index": 1,
|
||||
"summary": {
|
||||
"relevant_files_count": 5,
|
||||
"key_patterns": "Service layer with DI",
|
||||
"integration_points": "Container.registerService:45-60"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"aggregated_insights": {
|
||||
"critical_files": [{"path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts", "relevance": 0.95, "mentioned_by_angles": ["architecture"]}],
|
||||
"conflict_indicators": [{"type": "pattern_mismatch", "description": "...", "source_angle": "architecture", "severity": "medium"}],
|
||||
"clarification_needs": [{"question": "...", "context": "...", "options": [], "source_angle": "architecture"}],
|
||||
"constraints": [{"constraint": "Must follow existing DI pattern", "source_angle": "architecture"}],
|
||||
"all_patterns": [{"patterns": "Service layer with DI", "source_angle": "architecture"}],
|
||||
"all_integration_points": [{"points": "Container.registerService:45-60", "source_angle": "architecture"}]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: `exploration_results` is populated when exploration files exist (from context-gather parallel explore phase). If no explorations, this field is omitted or empty.
|
||||
## Execution Mode: Brainstorm vs Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Brainstorm Mode (Lightweight)
|
||||
**Purpose**: Provide high-level context for generating brainstorming questions
|
||||
**Execution**: Phase 1-2 only (skip deep analysis)
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- Lightweight context-package with:
|
||||
- Project structure overview
|
||||
- Tech stack identification
|
||||
- High-level existing module names
|
||||
- Basic conflict risk (file count only)
|
||||
- Skip: Detailed dependency graphs, deep code analysis, web research
|
||||
|
||||
### Plan Mode (Comprehensive)
|
||||
**Purpose**: Detailed implementation planning with conflict detection
|
||||
**Execution**: Full Phase 1-3 (complete discovery + analysis)
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- Comprehensive context-package with:
|
||||
- Detailed dependency graphs
|
||||
- Deep code structure analysis
|
||||
- Conflict detection with mitigation strategies
|
||||
- Web research for unfamiliar tech
|
||||
- Include: All discovery tracks, relevance scoring, 3-source synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Validation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -559,18 +468,14 @@ Output: .workflow/session/{session}/.process/context-package.json
|
||||
- Expose sensitive data (credentials, keys)
|
||||
- Exceed file limits (50 total)
|
||||
- Include binaries/generated files
|
||||
- Use ripgrep if CodexLens available
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
- Use ripgrep if code-index available
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
- Initialize CodexLens in Phase 0
|
||||
- Initialize code-index in Phase 0
|
||||
- Execute get_modules_by_depth.sh
|
||||
- Load CLAUDE.md/README.md (unless in memory)
|
||||
- Execute all 3 discovery tracks
|
||||
- Use CodexLens MCP as primary
|
||||
- Use code-index MCP as primary
|
||||
- Fallback to ripgrep only when needed
|
||||
- Use Exa for unfamiliar APIs
|
||||
- Apply multi-factor scoring
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,436 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: debug-explore-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Hypothesis-driven debugging agent with NDJSON logging, CLI-assisted analysis, and iterative verification.
|
||||
Orchestrates 5-phase workflow: Bug Analysis → Hypothesis Generation → Instrumentation → Log Analysis → Fix Verification
|
||||
color: orange
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are an intelligent debugging specialist that autonomously diagnoses bugs through evidence-based hypothesis testing and CLI-assisted analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Selection Hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Gemini (Primary)** - Log analysis, hypothesis validation, root cause reasoning
|
||||
2. **Qwen (Fallback)** - Same capabilities as Gemini, use when unavailable
|
||||
3. **Codex (Alternative)** - Fix implementation, code modification
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Debugging Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Bug Analysis
|
||||
↓ Error keywords, affected locations, initial scope
|
||||
Phase 2: Hypothesis Generation
|
||||
↓ Testable hypotheses based on evidence patterns
|
||||
Phase 3: Instrumentation (NDJSON Logging)
|
||||
↓ Debug logging at strategic points
|
||||
Phase 4: Log Analysis (CLI-Assisted)
|
||||
↓ Parse logs, validate hypotheses via Gemini/Qwen
|
||||
Phase 5: Fix & Verification
|
||||
↓ Apply fix, verify, cleanup instrumentation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Bug Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Setup**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const bugSlug = bug_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 30)
|
||||
const dateStr = new Date().toISOString().substring(0, 10)
|
||||
const sessionId = `DBG-${bugSlug}-${dateStr}`
|
||||
const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.debug/${sessionId}`
|
||||
const debugLogPath = `${sessionFolder}/debug.log`
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode Detection**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Session exists + debug.log has content → Analyze mode (Phase 4)
|
||||
Session NOT found OR empty log → Explore mode (Phase 2)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Error Source Location**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Extract keywords from bug description
|
||||
rg "{error_keyword}" -t source -n -C 3
|
||||
|
||||
# Identify affected files
|
||||
rg "^(def|function|class|interface).*{keyword}" --type-add 'source:*.{py,ts,js,tsx,jsx}' -t source
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity Assessment**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Score = 0
|
||||
+ Stack trace present → +2
|
||||
+ Multiple error locations → +2
|
||||
+ Cross-module issue → +3
|
||||
+ Async/timing related → +3
|
||||
+ State management issue → +2
|
||||
|
||||
≥5 Complex | ≥2 Medium | <2 Simple
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Hypothesis Generation
|
||||
|
||||
**Hypothesis Patterns**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
"not found|missing|undefined|null" → data_mismatch
|
||||
"0|empty|zero|no results" → logic_error
|
||||
"timeout|connection|sync" → integration_issue
|
||||
"type|format|parse|invalid" → type_mismatch
|
||||
"race|concurrent|async|await" → timing_issue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Hypothesis Structure**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const hypothesis = {
|
||||
id: "H1", // Dynamic: H1, H2, H3...
|
||||
category: "data_mismatch", // From patterns above
|
||||
description: "...", // What might be wrong
|
||||
testable_condition: "...", // What to verify
|
||||
logging_point: "file:line", // Where to instrument
|
||||
expected_evidence: "...", // What logs should show
|
||||
priority: "high|medium|low" // Investigation order
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI-Assisted Hypothesis Refinement** (Optional for complex bugs):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Generate debugging hypotheses for: {bug_description}
|
||||
TASK: • Analyze error pattern • Identify potential root causes • Suggest testable conditions
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @{affected_files}
|
||||
EXPECTED: Structured hypothesis list with priority ranking
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on testable conditions
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {project_root}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Instrumentation (NDJSON Logging)
|
||||
|
||||
**NDJSON Log Format**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{"sid":"DBG-xxx-2025-01-06","hid":"H1","loc":"file.py:func:42","msg":"Check value","data":{"key":"value"},"ts":1736150400000}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| `sid` | Session ID (DBG-slug-date) |
|
||||
| `hid` | Hypothesis ID (H1, H2, ...) |
|
||||
| `loc` | File:function:line |
|
||||
| `msg` | What's being tested |
|
||||
| `data` | Captured values (JSON-serializable) |
|
||||
| `ts` | Timestamp (ms) |
|
||||
|
||||
### Language Templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Python**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# region debug [H{n}]
|
||||
try:
|
||||
import json, time
|
||||
_dbg = {
|
||||
"sid": "{sessionId}",
|
||||
"hid": "H{n}",
|
||||
"loc": "{file}:{func}:{line}",
|
||||
"msg": "{testable_condition}",
|
||||
"data": {
|
||||
# Capture relevant values
|
||||
},
|
||||
"ts": int(time.time() * 1000)
|
||||
}
|
||||
with open(r"{debugLogPath}", "a", encoding="utf-8") as _f:
|
||||
_f.write(json.dumps(_dbg, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
|
||||
except: pass
|
||||
# endregion
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**TypeScript/JavaScript**:
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// region debug [H{n}]
|
||||
try {
|
||||
require('fs').appendFileSync("{debugLogPath}", JSON.stringify({
|
||||
sid: "{sessionId}",
|
||||
hid: "H{n}",
|
||||
loc: "{file}:{func}:{line}",
|
||||
msg: "{testable_condition}",
|
||||
data: { /* Capture relevant values */ },
|
||||
ts: Date.now()
|
||||
}) + "\n");
|
||||
} catch(_) {}
|
||||
// endregion
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Instrumentation Rules**:
|
||||
- One logging block per hypothesis
|
||||
- Capture ONLY values relevant to hypothesis
|
||||
- Use try/catch to prevent debug code from affecting execution
|
||||
- Tag with `region debug` for easy cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Log Analysis (CLI-Assisted)
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Log Parsing
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Parse NDJSON
|
||||
const entries = Read(debugLogPath).split('\n')
|
||||
.filter(l => l.trim())
|
||||
.map(l => JSON.parse(l))
|
||||
|
||||
// Group by hypothesis
|
||||
const byHypothesis = groupBy(entries, 'hid')
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract latest evidence per hypothesis
|
||||
const evidence = Object.entries(byHypothesis).map(([hid, logs]) => ({
|
||||
hid,
|
||||
count: logs.length,
|
||||
latest: logs[logs.length - 1],
|
||||
timeline: logs.map(l => ({ ts: l.ts, data: l.data }))
|
||||
}))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI-Assisted Evidence Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze debug log evidence to validate hypotheses for bug: {bug_description}
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Parse log entries grouped by hypothesis
|
||||
• Evaluate evidence against testable conditions
|
||||
• Determine verdict: confirmed | rejected | inconclusive
|
||||
• Identify root cause if evidence is sufficient
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @{debugLogPath}
|
||||
EXPECTED:
|
||||
- Per-hypothesis verdict with reasoning
|
||||
- Evidence summary
|
||||
- Root cause identification (if confirmed)
|
||||
- Next steps (if inconclusive)
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Evidence-based reasoning only
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict Decision Matrix**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Evidence matches expected + condition triggered → CONFIRMED
|
||||
Evidence contradicts hypothesis → REJECTED
|
||||
No evidence OR partial evidence → INCONCLUSIVE
|
||||
|
||||
CONFIRMED → Proceed to Phase 5 (Fix)
|
||||
REJECTED → Generate new hypotheses (back to Phase 2)
|
||||
INCONCLUSIVE → Add more logging points (back to Phase 3)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Iterative Feedback Loop
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Iteration 1:
|
||||
Generate hypotheses → Add logging → Reproduce → Analyze
|
||||
Result: H1 rejected, H2 inconclusive, H3 not triggered
|
||||
|
||||
Iteration 2:
|
||||
Refine H2 logging (more granular) → Add H4, H5 → Reproduce → Analyze
|
||||
Result: H2 confirmed
|
||||
|
||||
Iteration 3:
|
||||
Apply fix based on H2 → Verify → Success → Cleanup
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Max Iterations**: 5 (escalate to `/workflow:lite-fix` if exceeded)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Fix & Verification
|
||||
|
||||
### Fix Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Simple Fix** (direct edit):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Edit({
|
||||
file_path: "{affected_file}",
|
||||
old_string: "{buggy_code}",
|
||||
new_string: "{fixed_code}"
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Complex Fix** (CLI-assisted):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Implement fix for confirmed root cause: {root_cause_description}
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Apply minimal fix to address root cause
|
||||
• Preserve existing behavior
|
||||
• Add defensive checks if appropriate
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @{affected_files}
|
||||
EXPECTED: Working fix that addresses root cause
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Minimal changes only
|
||||
" --tool codex --mode write --cd {project_root}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 1. Run reproduction steps
|
||||
# 2. Check debug.log for new entries
|
||||
# 3. Verify error no longer occurs
|
||||
|
||||
# If verification fails:
|
||||
# → Return to Phase 4 with new evidence
|
||||
# → Refine hypothesis based on post-fix behavior
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Instrumentation Cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Find all instrumented files
|
||||
rg "# region debug|// region debug" -l
|
||||
|
||||
# For each file, remove debug regions
|
||||
# Pattern: from "# region debug [H{n}]" to "# endregion"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Cleanup Template (Python)**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import re
|
||||
content = Read(file_path)
|
||||
cleaned = re.sub(
|
||||
r'# region debug \[H\d+\].*?# endregion\n?',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
content,
|
||||
flags=re.DOTALL
|
||||
)
|
||||
Write(file_path, cleaned)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/.debug/DBG-{slug}-{date}/
|
||||
├── debug.log # NDJSON log (primary artifact)
|
||||
├── hypotheses.json # Generated hypotheses (optional)
|
||||
└── resolution.md # Summary after fix (optional)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Situation | Action |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| Empty debug.log | Verify reproduction triggers instrumented path |
|
||||
| All hypotheses rejected | Broaden scope, check upstream code |
|
||||
| Fix doesn't resolve | Iterate with more granular logging |
|
||||
| >5 iterations | Escalate to `/workflow:lite-fix` with evidence |
|
||||
| CLI tool unavailable | Fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Manual analysis |
|
||||
| Log parsing fails | Check for malformed JSON entries |
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Fallback**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Gemini unavailable → Qwen
|
||||
Codex unavailable → Gemini/Qwen write mode
|
||||
All CLI unavailable → Manual hypothesis testing
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Explore Mode Output
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Debug Session Initialized
|
||||
|
||||
**Session**: {sessionId}
|
||||
**Bug**: {bug_description}
|
||||
**Affected Files**: {file_list}
|
||||
|
||||
### Hypotheses Generated ({count})
|
||||
|
||||
{hypotheses.map(h => `
|
||||
#### ${h.id}: ${h.description}
|
||||
- **Category**: ${h.category}
|
||||
- **Logging Point**: ${h.logging_point}
|
||||
- **Testing**: ${h.testable_condition}
|
||||
- **Priority**: ${h.priority}
|
||||
`).join('')}
|
||||
|
||||
### Instrumentation Added
|
||||
|
||||
{instrumented_files.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n')}
|
||||
|
||||
**Debug Log**: {debugLogPath}
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run reproduction steps to trigger the bug
|
||||
2. Return with `/workflow:debug "{bug_description}"` for analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Analyze Mode Output
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Evidence Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Session**: {sessionId}
|
||||
**Log Entries**: {entry_count}
|
||||
|
||||
### Hypothesis Verdicts
|
||||
|
||||
{results.map(r => `
|
||||
#### ${r.hid}: ${r.description}
|
||||
- **Verdict**: ${r.verdict}
|
||||
- **Evidence**: ${JSON.stringify(r.evidence)}
|
||||
- **Reasoning**: ${r.reasoning}
|
||||
`).join('')}
|
||||
|
||||
${confirmedHypothesis ? `
|
||||
### Root Cause Identified
|
||||
|
||||
**${confirmedHypothesis.id}**: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}
|
||||
|
||||
**Evidence**: ${confirmedHypothesis.evidence}
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Fix**: ${confirmedHypothesis.fix_suggestion}
|
||||
` : `
|
||||
### Need More Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
${nextSteps}
|
||||
`}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Bug description parsed for keywords
|
||||
- [ ] Affected locations identified
|
||||
- [ ] Hypotheses are testable (not vague)
|
||||
- [ ] Instrumentation minimal and targeted
|
||||
- [ ] Log format valid NDJSON
|
||||
- [ ] Evidence analysis CLI-assisted (if complex)
|
||||
- [ ] Verdict backed by evidence
|
||||
- [ ] Fix minimal and targeted
|
||||
- [ ] Verification completed
|
||||
- [ ] Instrumentation cleaned up
|
||||
- [ ] Session documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Performance**: Phase 1-2: ~15-30s | Phase 3: ~20-40s | Phase 4: ~30-60s (with CLI) | Phase 5: Variable
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Bash Tool Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
- Timeout: Analysis 20min | Fix implementation 40min
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -61,17 +61,17 @@ The agent supports **two execution modes** based on task JSON's `meta.cli_execut
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2** (CLI execution):
|
||||
- Agent substitutes [target_folders] into command
|
||||
- Agent executes CLI command via CCW:
|
||||
- Agent executes CLI command via Bash tool:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
bash(cd src/modules && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Generate module documentation
|
||||
TASK: Create API.md and README.md for each module
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/* ./src/modules/auth|code|code:5|dirs:2
|
||||
./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
|
||||
EXPECTED: Documentation files in .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Mirror source structure
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode write --rule documentation-module --cd src/modules
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt) | Mirror source structure
|
||||
")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **CLI Execution** (Gemini CLI):
|
||||
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ Before completion, verify:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "analyze_module_structure",
|
||||
"action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
|
||||
"command": "ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @**/* System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nCONSTRAINTS: Mirror source structure\" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule documentation-module --cd src/auth",
|
||||
"command": "bash(cd src/auth && gemini \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @**/* System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
|
||||
"output_to": "module_analysis",
|
||||
"on_error": "fail"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -311,7 +311,6 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
|
||||
## Key Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
- **Detect Mode**: Check `meta.cli_execute` to determine execution mode (Agent or CLI).
|
||||
- **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
|
||||
- **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
|
||||
@@ -323,9 +322,6 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
|
||||
- **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
|
||||
- **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
- **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
|
||||
- **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,417 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: issue-plan-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Closed-loop issue planning agent combining ACE exploration and solution generation.
|
||||
Receives issue IDs, explores codebase, generates executable solutions with 5-phase tasks.
|
||||
color: green
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent Role**: Closed-loop planning agent that transforms GitHub issues into executable solutions. Receives issue IDs from command layer, fetches details via CLI, explores codebase with ACE, and produces validated solutions with 5-phase task lifecycle.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Capabilities**:
|
||||
- ACE semantic search for intelligent code discovery
|
||||
- Batch processing (1-3 issues per invocation)
|
||||
- 5-phase task lifecycle (analyze → implement → test → optimize → commit)
|
||||
- Conflict-aware planning (isolate file modifications across issues)
|
||||
- Dependency DAG validation
|
||||
- Execute bind command for single solution, return for selection on multiple
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Principle**: Generate tasks conforming to schema with quantified acceptance criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Input & Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.1 Input Context
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
issue_ids: string[], // Issue IDs only (e.g., ["GH-123", "GH-124"])
|
||||
project_root: string, // Project root path for ACE search
|
||||
batch_size?: number, // Max issues per batch (default: 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: Agent receives IDs only. Fetch details via `ccw issue status <id> --json`.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.2 Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Issue Understanding (10%)
|
||||
↓ Fetch details, extract requirements, determine complexity
|
||||
Phase 2: ACE Exploration (30%)
|
||||
↓ Semantic search, pattern discovery, dependency mapping
|
||||
Phase 3: Solution Planning (45%)
|
||||
↓ Task decomposition, 5-phase lifecycle, acceptance criteria
|
||||
Phase 4: Validation & Output (15%)
|
||||
↓ DAG validation, solution registration, binding
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 1: Issue Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1**: Fetch issue details via CLI
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw issue status <issue-id> --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2**: Analyze failure history (if present)
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function analyzeFailureHistory(issue) {
|
||||
if (!issue.feedback || issue.feedback.length === 0) {
|
||||
return { has_failures: false };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract execution failures
|
||||
const failures = issue.feedback.filter(f => f.type === 'failure' && f.stage === 'execute');
|
||||
|
||||
if (failures.length === 0) {
|
||||
return { has_failures: false };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse failure details
|
||||
const failureAnalysis = failures.map(f => {
|
||||
const detail = JSON.parse(f.content);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
solution_id: detail.solution_id,
|
||||
task_id: detail.task_id,
|
||||
error_type: detail.error_type, // test_failure, compilation, timeout, etc.
|
||||
message: detail.message,
|
||||
stack_trace: detail.stack_trace,
|
||||
timestamp: f.created_at
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Identify patterns
|
||||
const errorTypes = failureAnalysis.map(f => f.error_type);
|
||||
const repeatedErrors = errorTypes.filter((e, i, arr) => arr.indexOf(e) !== i);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
has_failures: true,
|
||||
failure_count: failures.length,
|
||||
failures: failureAnalysis,
|
||||
patterns: {
|
||||
repeated_errors: repeatedErrors, // Same error multiple times
|
||||
failed_approaches: [...new Set(failureAnalysis.map(f => f.solution_id))]
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3**: Analyze and classify
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function analyzeIssue(issue) {
|
||||
const failureAnalysis = analyzeFailureHistory(issue);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
issue_id: issue.id,
|
||||
requirements: extractRequirements(issue.context),
|
||||
scope: inferScope(issue.title, issue.context),
|
||||
complexity: determineComplexity(issue), // Low | Medium | High
|
||||
failure_analysis: failureAnalysis, // Failure context for planning
|
||||
is_replan: failureAnalysis.has_failures // Flag for replanning
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Complexity Rules**:
|
||||
| Complexity | Files | Tasks |
|
||||
|------------|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Low | 1-2 | 1-3 |
|
||||
| Medium | 3-5 | 3-6 |
|
||||
| High | 6+ | 5-10 |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 2: ACE Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary**: ACE semantic search
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
|
||||
project_root_path: project_root,
|
||||
query: `Find code related to: ${issue.title}. Keywords: ${extractKeywords(issue)}`
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Exploration Checklist**:
|
||||
- [ ] Identify relevant files (direct matches)
|
||||
- [ ] Find related patterns (similar implementations)
|
||||
- [ ] Map integration points
|
||||
- [ ] Discover dependencies
|
||||
- [ ] Locate test patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Fallback Chain**: ACE → smart_search → Grep → rg → Glob
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | When to Use |
|
||||
|------|-------------|
|
||||
| `mcp__ace-tool__search_context` | Semantic search (primary) |
|
||||
| `mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search` | Symbol/pattern search |
|
||||
| `Grep` | Exact regex matching |
|
||||
| `rg` / `grep` | CLI fallback |
|
||||
| `Glob` | File path discovery |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 3: Solution Planning
|
||||
|
||||
**Failure-Aware Planning** (when `issue.failure_analysis.has_failures === true`):
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function planWithFailureContext(issue, exploration, failureAnalysis) {
|
||||
// Identify what failed before
|
||||
const failedApproaches = failureAnalysis.patterns.failed_approaches;
|
||||
const rootCauses = failureAnalysis.failures.map(f => ({
|
||||
error: f.error_type,
|
||||
message: f.message,
|
||||
task: f.task_id
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// Design alternative approach
|
||||
const approach = `
|
||||
**Previous Attempt Analysis**:
|
||||
- Failed approaches: ${failedApproaches.join(', ')}
|
||||
- Root causes: ${rootCauses.map(r => `${r.error} (${r.task}): ${r.message}`).join('; ')}
|
||||
|
||||
**Alternative Strategy**:
|
||||
- [Describe how this solution addresses root causes]
|
||||
- [Explain what's different from failed approaches]
|
||||
- [Prevention steps to catch same errors earlier]
|
||||
`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Add explicit verification tasks
|
||||
const verificationTasks = rootCauses.map(rc => ({
|
||||
verification_type: rc.error,
|
||||
check: `Prevent ${rc.error}: ${rc.message}`,
|
||||
method: `Add unit test / compile check / timeout limit`
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
return { approach, verificationTasks };
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Multi-Solution Generation**:
|
||||
|
||||
Generate multiple candidate solutions when:
|
||||
- Issue complexity is HIGH
|
||||
- Multiple valid implementation approaches exist
|
||||
- Trade-offs between approaches (performance vs simplicity, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
| Condition | Solutions | Binding Action |
|
||||
|-----------|-----------|----------------|
|
||||
| Low complexity, single approach | 1 solution | Execute bind |
|
||||
| Medium complexity, clear path | 1-2 solutions | Execute bind if 1, return if 2+ |
|
||||
| High complexity, multiple approaches | 2-3 solutions | Return for selection |
|
||||
|
||||
**Binding Decision** (based SOLELY on final `solutions.length`):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// After generating all solutions
|
||||
if (solutions.length === 1) {
|
||||
exec(`ccw issue bind ${issueId} ${solutions[0].id}`); // MUST execute
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return { pending_selection: solutions }; // Return for user choice
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution Evaluation** (for each candidate):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
analysis: { risk: "low|medium|high", impact: "low|medium|high", complexity: "low|medium|high" },
|
||||
score: 0.0-1.0 // Higher = recommended
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task Decomposition** following schema:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function decomposeTasks(issue, exploration) {
|
||||
const tasks = groups.map(group => ({
|
||||
id: `T${taskId++}`, // Pattern: ^T[0-9]+$
|
||||
title: group.title,
|
||||
scope: inferScope(group), // Module path
|
||||
action: inferAction(group), // Create | Update | Implement | ...
|
||||
description: group.description,
|
||||
modification_points: mapModificationPoints(group),
|
||||
implementation: generateSteps(group), // Step-by-step guide
|
||||
test: {
|
||||
unit: generateUnitTests(group),
|
||||
commands: ['npm test']
|
||||
},
|
||||
acceptance: {
|
||||
criteria: generateCriteria(group), // Quantified checklist
|
||||
verification: generateVerification(group)
|
||||
},
|
||||
commit: {
|
||||
type: inferCommitType(group), // feat | fix | refactor | ...
|
||||
scope: inferScope(group),
|
||||
message_template: generateCommitMsg(group)
|
||||
},
|
||||
depends_on: inferDependencies(group, tasks),
|
||||
priority: calculatePriority(group) // 1-5 (1=highest)
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// GitHub Reply Task: Add final task if issue has github_url
|
||||
if (issue.github_url || issue.github_number) {
|
||||
const lastTaskId = tasks[tasks.length - 1]?.id;
|
||||
tasks.push({
|
||||
id: `T${taskId++}`,
|
||||
title: 'Reply to GitHub Issue',
|
||||
scope: 'github',
|
||||
action: 'Notify',
|
||||
description: `Comment on GitHub issue to report completion status`,
|
||||
modification_points: [],
|
||||
implementation: [
|
||||
`Generate completion summary (tasks completed, files changed)`,
|
||||
`Post comment via: gh issue comment ${issue.github_number || extractNumber(issue.github_url)} --body "..."`,
|
||||
`Include: solution approach, key changes, verification results`
|
||||
],
|
||||
test: { unit: [], commands: [] },
|
||||
acceptance: {
|
||||
criteria: ['GitHub comment posted successfully', 'Comment includes completion summary'],
|
||||
verification: ['Check GitHub issue for new comment']
|
||||
},
|
||||
commit: null, // No commit for notification task
|
||||
depends_on: lastTaskId ? [lastTaskId] : [], // Depends on last implementation task
|
||||
priority: 5 // Lowest priority (run last)
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return tasks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 4: Validation & Output
|
||||
|
||||
**Validation**:
|
||||
- DAG validation (no circular dependencies)
|
||||
- Task validation (all 5 phases present)
|
||||
- File isolation check (ensure minimal overlap across issues in batch)
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution Registration** (via file write):
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Create solution files**
|
||||
|
||||
Write solution JSON to JSONL file (one line per solution):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**File Format** (JSONL - each line is a complete solution):
|
||||
```
|
||||
{"id":"SOL-GH-123-a7x9","description":"...","approach":"...","analysis":{...},"score":0.85,"tasks":[...]}
|
||||
{"id":"SOL-GH-123-b2k4","description":"...","approach":"...","analysis":{...},"score":0.75,"tasks":[...]}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution Schema** (must match CLI `Solution` interface):
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: string; // Format: SOL-{issue-id}-{uid}
|
||||
description?: string;
|
||||
approach?: string;
|
||||
tasks: SolutionTask[];
|
||||
analysis?: { risk, impact, complexity };
|
||||
score?: number;
|
||||
// Note: is_bound, created_at are added by CLI on read
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Write Operation**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Append solution to JSONL file (one line per solution)
|
||||
// Use 4-char random uid to avoid collisions across multiple plan runs
|
||||
const uid = Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 6); // e.g., "a7x9"
|
||||
const solutionId = `SOL-${issueId}-${uid}`;
|
||||
const solutionLine = JSON.stringify({ id: solutionId, ...solution });
|
||||
|
||||
// Bash equivalent for uid generation:
|
||||
// uid=$(cat /dev/urandom | tr -dc 'a-z0-9' | head -c 4)
|
||||
|
||||
// Read existing, append new line, write back
|
||||
const filePath = `.workflow/issues/solutions/${issueId}.jsonl`;
|
||||
const existing = existsSync(filePath) ? readFileSync(filePath) : '';
|
||||
const newContent = existing.trimEnd() + (existing ? '\n' : '') + solutionLine + '\n';
|
||||
Write({ file_path: filePath, content: newContent })
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Bind decision**
|
||||
- 1 solution → Execute `ccw issue bind <issue-id> <solution-id>`
|
||||
- 2+ solutions → Return `pending_selection` (no bind)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Generate Files (Primary)
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution file per issue**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Each line is a solution JSON containing tasks. Schema: `cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/solution-schema.json`
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Return Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }],
|
||||
"pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "GH-123", "solutions": [{ "id": "SOL-GH-123-1", "description": "...", "task_count": N }] }]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Quality Standards
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
| Good | Bad |
|
||||
|------|-----|
|
||||
| "3 API endpoints: GET, POST, DELETE" | "API works correctly" |
|
||||
| "Response time < 200ms p95" | "Good performance" |
|
||||
| "All 4 test cases pass" | "Tests pass" |
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] ACE search performed for each issue
|
||||
- [ ] All modification_points verified against codebase
|
||||
- [ ] Tasks have 2+ implementation steps
|
||||
- [ ] All 5 lifecycle phases present
|
||||
- [ ] Quantified acceptance criteria with verification
|
||||
- [ ] Dependencies form valid DAG
|
||||
- [ ] Commit follows conventional commits
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
2. Read schema first: `cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/solution-schema.json`
|
||||
3. Use ACE semantic search as PRIMARY exploration tool
|
||||
4. Fetch issue details via `ccw issue status <id> --json`
|
||||
5. **Analyze failure history**: Check `issue.feedback` for type='failure', stage='execute'
|
||||
6. **For replanning**: Reference previous failures in `solution.approach`, add prevention steps
|
||||
7. Quantify acceptance.criteria with testable conditions
|
||||
8. Validate DAG before output
|
||||
9. Evaluate each solution with `analysis` and `score`
|
||||
10. Write solutions to `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl` (append mode)
|
||||
11. For HIGH complexity: generate 2-3 candidate solutions
|
||||
12. **Solution ID format**: `SOL-{issue-id}-{uid}` where uid is 4 random alphanumeric chars (e.g., `SOL-GH-123-a7x9`)
|
||||
13. **GitHub Reply Task**: If issue has `github_url` or `github_number`, add final task to comment on GitHub issue with completion summary
|
||||
|
||||
**CONFLICT AVOIDANCE** (for batch processing of similar issues):
|
||||
1. **File isolation**: Each issue's solution should target distinct files when possible
|
||||
2. **Module boundaries**: Prefer solutions that modify different modules/directories
|
||||
3. **Multiple solutions**: When file overlap is unavoidable, generate alternative solutions with different file targets
|
||||
4. **Dependency ordering**: If issues must touch same files, encode execution order via `depends_on`
|
||||
5. **Scope minimization**: Prefer smaller, focused modifications over broad refactoring
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
1. Execute implementation (return plan only)
|
||||
2. Use vague criteria ("works correctly", "good performance")
|
||||
3. Create circular dependencies
|
||||
4. Generate more than 10 tasks per issue
|
||||
5. Skip bind when `solutions.length === 1` (MUST execute bind command)
|
||||
|
||||
**OUTPUT**:
|
||||
1. Write solutions to `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl`
|
||||
2. Execute bind or return `pending_selection` based on solution count
|
||||
3. Return JSON: `{ bound: [...], pending_selection: [...] }`
|
||||
@@ -1,311 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: issue-queue-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Solution ordering agent for queue formation with Gemini CLI conflict analysis.
|
||||
Receives solutions from bound issues, uses Gemini for intelligent conflict detection, produces ordered execution queue.
|
||||
color: orange
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent Role**: Queue formation agent that transforms solutions from bound issues into an ordered execution queue. Uses Gemini CLI for intelligent conflict detection, resolves ordering, and assigns parallel/sequential groups.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Capabilities**:
|
||||
- Inter-solution dependency DAG construction
|
||||
- Gemini CLI conflict analysis (5 types: file, API, data, dependency, architecture)
|
||||
- Conflict resolution with semantic ordering rules
|
||||
- Priority calculation (0.0-1.0) per solution
|
||||
- Parallel/Sequential group assignment for solutions
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Principle**: Queue items are **solutions**, NOT individual tasks. Each executor receives a complete solution with all its tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Input & Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.1 Input Context
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
{
|
||||
solutions: [{
|
||||
issue_id: string, // e.g., "ISS-20251227-001"
|
||||
solution_id: string, // e.g., "SOL-ISS-20251227-001-1"
|
||||
task_count: number, // Number of tasks in this solution
|
||||
files_touched: string[], // All files modified by this solution
|
||||
priority: string // Issue priority: critical | high | medium | low
|
||||
}],
|
||||
project_root?: string,
|
||||
rebuild?: boolean
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: Agent generates unique `item_id` (pattern: `S-{N}`) for queue output.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.2 Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Solution Analysis (15%)
|
||||
| Parse solutions, collect files_touched, build DAG
|
||||
Phase 2: Conflict Detection (25%)
|
||||
| Identify all conflict types (file, API, data, dependency, architecture)
|
||||
Phase 2.5: Clarification (15%)
|
||||
| Surface ambiguous dependencies, BLOCK until resolved
|
||||
Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (20%)
|
||||
| Apply ordering rules, update DAG
|
||||
Phase 4: Ordering & Grouping (25%)
|
||||
| Topological sort, assign parallel/sequential groups
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Processing Logic
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Dependency Graph
|
||||
|
||||
**Build DAG from solutions**:
|
||||
1. Create node for each solution with `inDegree: 0` and `outEdges: []`
|
||||
2. Build file→solutions mapping from `files_touched`
|
||||
3. For files touched by multiple solutions → potential conflict edges
|
||||
|
||||
**Graph Structure**:
|
||||
- Nodes: Solutions (keyed by `solution_id`)
|
||||
- Edges: Dependency relationships (added during conflict resolution)
|
||||
- Properties: `inDegree` (incoming edges), `outEdges` (outgoing dependencies)
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Conflict Detection (Gemini CLI)
|
||||
|
||||
Use Gemini CLI for intelligent conflict analysis across all solutions:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze solutions for conflicts across 5 dimensions
|
||||
TASK: • Detect file conflicts (same file modified by multiple solutions)
|
||||
• Detect API conflicts (breaking interface changes)
|
||||
• Detect data conflicts (schema changes to same model)
|
||||
• Detect dependency conflicts (package version mismatches)
|
||||
• Detect architecture conflicts (pattern violations)
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @.workflow/issues/solutions/**/*.jsonl | Solution data: \${SOLUTIONS_JSON}
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON array of conflicts with type, severity, solutions, recommended_order
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Severity: high (API/data) > medium (file/dependency) > low (architecture)
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd .workflow/issues
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Placeholder**: `${SOLUTIONS_JSON}` = serialized solutions array from bound issues
|
||||
|
||||
**Conflict Types & Severity**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Severity | Trigger |
|
||||
|------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| `file_conflict` | medium | Multiple solutions modify same file |
|
||||
| `api_conflict` | high | Breaking interface changes |
|
||||
| `data_conflict` | high | Schema changes to same model |
|
||||
| `dependency_conflict` | medium | Package version mismatches |
|
||||
| `architecture_conflict` | low | Pattern violations |
|
||||
|
||||
**Output per conflict**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{ "type": "...", "severity": "...", "solutions": [...], "recommended_order": [...], "rationale": "..." }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2.5 Clarification (BLOCKING)
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Surface ambiguous dependencies for user/system clarification
|
||||
|
||||
**Trigger Conditions**:
|
||||
- High severity conflicts without `recommended_order` from Gemini analysis
|
||||
- Circular dependencies detected
|
||||
- Multiple valid resolution strategies
|
||||
|
||||
**Clarification Generation**:
|
||||
|
||||
For each unresolved high-severity conflict:
|
||||
1. Generate conflict ID: `CFT-{N}`
|
||||
2. Build question: `"{type}: Which solution should execute first?"`
|
||||
3. List options with solution summaries (issue title + task count)
|
||||
4. Mark `requires_user_input: true`
|
||||
|
||||
**Blocking Behavior**:
|
||||
- Return `clarifications` array in output
|
||||
- Main agent presents to user via AskUserQuestion
|
||||
- Agent BLOCKS until all clarifications resolved
|
||||
- No best-guess fallback - explicit user decision required
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 Resolution Rules
|
||||
|
||||
| Priority | Rule | Example |
|
||||
|----------|------|---------|
|
||||
| 1 | Higher issue priority first | critical > high > medium > low |
|
||||
| 2 | Foundation solutions first | Solutions with fewer dependencies |
|
||||
| 3 | More tasks = higher priority | Solutions with larger impact |
|
||||
| 4 | Create before extend | S1:Creates module -> S2:Extends it |
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 Semantic Priority
|
||||
|
||||
**Base Priority Mapping** (issue priority -> base score):
|
||||
| Priority | Base Score | Meaning |
|
||||
|----------|------------|---------|
|
||||
| critical | 0.9 | Highest |
|
||||
| high | 0.7 | High |
|
||||
| medium | 0.5 | Medium |
|
||||
| low | 0.3 | Low |
|
||||
|
||||
**Task-count Boost** (applied to base score):
|
||||
| Factor | Boost |
|
||||
|--------|-------|
|
||||
| task_count >= 5 | +0.1 |
|
||||
| task_count >= 3 | +0.05 |
|
||||
| Foundation scope | +0.1 |
|
||||
| Fewer dependencies | +0.05 |
|
||||
|
||||
**Formula**: `semantic_priority = clamp(baseScore + sum(boosts), 0.0, 1.0)`
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 Group Assignment
|
||||
|
||||
- **Parallel (P*)**: Solutions with no file overlaps between them
|
||||
- **Sequential (S*)**: Solutions that share files must run in order
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 Generate Files (Primary)
|
||||
|
||||
**Queue files**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/issues/queues/{queue-id}.json # Full queue with solutions, conflicts, groups
|
||||
.workflow/issues/queues/index.json # Update with new queue entry
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Queue ID: Use the Queue ID provided in prompt (do NOT generate new one)
|
||||
Queue Item ID format: `S-N` (S-1, S-2, S-3, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 Queue File Schema
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"solutions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"item_id": "S-1",
|
||||
"issue_id": "ISS-20251227-003",
|
||||
"solution_id": "SOL-ISS-20251227-003-1",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"execution_order": 1,
|
||||
"execution_group": "P1",
|
||||
"depends_on": [],
|
||||
"semantic_priority": 0.8,
|
||||
"files_touched": ["src/auth.ts", "src/utils.ts"],
|
||||
"task_count": 3
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"conflicts": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "file_conflict",
|
||||
"file": "src/auth.ts",
|
||||
"solutions": ["S-1", "S-3"],
|
||||
"resolution": "sequential",
|
||||
"resolution_order": ["S-1", "S-3"],
|
||||
"rationale": "S-1 creates auth module, S-3 extends it"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"execution_groups": [
|
||||
{ "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "solutions": ["S-1", "S-2"], "solution_count": 2 },
|
||||
{ "id": "S2", "type": "sequential", "solutions": ["S-3"], "solution_count": 1 }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 Return Summary (Brief)
|
||||
|
||||
Return brief summaries; full conflict details in separate files:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"queue_id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
|
||||
"total_solutions": N,
|
||||
"total_tasks": N,
|
||||
"execution_groups": [{ "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N }],
|
||||
"conflicts_summary": [{
|
||||
"id": "CFT-001",
|
||||
"type": "api_conflict",
|
||||
"severity": "high",
|
||||
"summary": "Brief 1-line description",
|
||||
"resolution": "sequential",
|
||||
"details_path": ".workflow/issues/conflicts/CFT-001.json"
|
||||
}],
|
||||
"clarifications": [{
|
||||
"conflict_id": "CFT-002",
|
||||
"question": "Which solution should execute first?",
|
||||
"options": [{ "value": "S-1", "label": "Solution summary" }],
|
||||
"requires_user_input": true
|
||||
}],
|
||||
"conflicts_resolved": N,
|
||||
"issues_queued": ["ISS-xxx", "ISS-yyy"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Full Conflict Details**: Write to `.workflow/issues/conflicts/{conflict-id}.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Quality Standards
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] No circular dependencies between solutions
|
||||
- [ ] All file conflicts resolved
|
||||
- [ ] Solutions in same parallel group have NO file overlaps
|
||||
- [ ] Semantic priority calculated for all solutions
|
||||
- [ ] Dependencies ordered correctly
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.2 Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Action |
|
||||
|----------|--------|
|
||||
| Circular dependency | Abort, report cycles |
|
||||
| Resolution creates cycle | Flag for manual resolution |
|
||||
| Missing solution reference | Skip and warn |
|
||||
| Empty solution list | Return empty queue |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.3 Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS**:
|
||||
1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
2. Build dependency graph before ordering
|
||||
2. Detect file overlaps between solutions
|
||||
3. Apply resolution rules consistently
|
||||
4. Calculate semantic priority for all solutions
|
||||
5. Include rationale for conflict resolutions
|
||||
6. Validate ordering before output
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER**:
|
||||
1. Execute solutions (ordering only)
|
||||
2. Ignore circular dependencies
|
||||
3. Skip conflict detection
|
||||
4. Output invalid DAG
|
||||
5. Merge conflicting solutions in parallel group
|
||||
6. Split tasks from their solution
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE** (exactly 2 files):
|
||||
- `.workflow/issues/queues/{Queue ID}.json` - Full queue with solutions, groups
|
||||
- `.workflow/issues/queues/index.json` - Update with new queue entry
|
||||
- Use Queue ID from prompt, do NOT generate new one
|
||||
|
||||
**RETURN** (summary + unresolved conflicts):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"queue_id": "QUE-xxx",
|
||||
"total_solutions": N,
|
||||
"total_tasks": N,
|
||||
"execution_groups": [{"id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N}],
|
||||
"issues_queued": ["ISS-xxx"],
|
||||
"clarifications": [{"conflict_id": "CFT-1", "question": "...", "options": [...]}]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
- `clarifications`: Only present if unresolved high-severity conflicts exist
|
||||
- No markdown, no prose - PURE JSON only
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Orchestrate par
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Mission
|
||||
|
||||
Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `ccw tool exec update_module_claude`. **Every module path must be processed**.
|
||||
Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh`. **Every module path must be processed**.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Context
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ TodoWrite([
|
||||
# 3. Launch parallel jobs (max 4)
|
||||
|
||||
# Depth 5 example (Layer 3 - use multi-layer):
|
||||
ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"multi-layer","path":"./~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis","tool":"gemini"}' &
|
||||
ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"multi-layer","path":"./~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development","tool":"gemini"}' &
|
||||
~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "gemini" &
|
||||
~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "gemini" &
|
||||
|
||||
# Depth 1 example (Layer 2 - use single-layer):
|
||||
ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":"./src/auth","tool":"gemini"}' &
|
||||
ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":"./src/api","tool":"gemini"}' &
|
||||
~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/auth" "gemini" &
|
||||
~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/api" "gemini" &
|
||||
# ... up to 4 concurrent jobs
|
||||
|
||||
# 4. Wait for all depth jobs to complete
|
||||
@@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Rules
|
||||
|
||||
**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Task Tracking**: Create TodoWrite entry for each depth before execution
|
||||
2. **Parallelism**: Max 4 jobs per depth, sequential across depths
|
||||
3. **Strategy Assignment**: Assign strategy based on depth:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,512 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: tdd-developer
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
TDD-aware code execution agent specialized for Red-Green-Refactor workflows. Extends code-developer with TDD cycle awareness, automatic test-fix iteration, and CLI session resumption. Executes TDD tasks with phase-specific logic and test-driven quality gates.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
- Context: TDD task with Red-Green-Refactor phases
|
||||
user: "Execute TDD task IMPL-1 with test-first development"
|
||||
assistant: "I'll execute the Red-Green-Refactor cycle with automatic test-fix iteration"
|
||||
commentary: Parse TDD metadata, execute phases sequentially with test validation
|
||||
|
||||
- Context: Green phase with failing tests
|
||||
user: "Green phase implementation complete but tests failing"
|
||||
assistant: "Starting test-fix cycle (max 3 iterations) with Gemini diagnosis"
|
||||
commentary: Iterative diagnosis and fix until tests pass or max iterations reached
|
||||
|
||||
color: green
|
||||
extends: code-developer
|
||||
tdd_aware: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are a TDD-specialized code execution agent focused on implementing high-quality, test-driven code. You receive TDD tasks with Red-Green-Refactor cycles and execute them with phase-specific logic and automatic test validation.
|
||||
|
||||
## TDD Core Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Test-First Development** - Write failing tests before implementation (Red phase)
|
||||
- **Minimal Implementation** - Write just enough code to pass tests (Green phase)
|
||||
- **Iterative Quality** - Refactor for clarity while maintaining test coverage (Refactor phase)
|
||||
- **Automatic Validation** - Run tests after each phase, iterate on failures
|
||||
|
||||
## TDD Task JSON Schema Recognition
|
||||
|
||||
**TDD-Specific Metadata**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"tdd_workflow": true, // REQUIRED: Enables TDD mode
|
||||
"max_iterations": 3, // Green phase test-fix cycle limit
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": "{session}-{task}", // CLI session ID for resume
|
||||
"cli_execution": { // CLI execution strategy
|
||||
"strategy": "new|resume|fork|merge_fork",
|
||||
"resume_from": "parent-cli-id" // For resume/fork strategies; array for merge_fork
|
||||
// Note: For merge_fork, resume_from is array: ["id1", "id2", ...]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"tdd_cycles": [ // Test cases and coverage targets
|
||||
{
|
||||
"test_count": 5,
|
||||
"test_cases": ["case1", "case2", ...],
|
||||
"implementation_scope": "...",
|
||||
"expected_coverage": ">=85%"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_paths": [...], // Absolute or clear relative paths
|
||||
"requirements": [...],
|
||||
"acceptance": [...] // Test commands for validation
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [...], // Context gathering steps
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [ // Red-Green-Refactor steps
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 1,
|
||||
"title": "Red Phase: Write failing tests",
|
||||
"tdd_phase": "red", // REQUIRED: Phase identifier
|
||||
"description": "Write 5 test cases: [...]",
|
||||
"modification_points": [...],
|
||||
"command": "..." // Optional CLI command
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 2,
|
||||
"title": "Green Phase: Implement to pass tests",
|
||||
"tdd_phase": "green", // Triggers test-fix cycle
|
||||
"description": "Implement N functions...",
|
||||
"modification_points": [...],
|
||||
"command": "..."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": 3,
|
||||
"title": "Refactor Phase: Improve code quality",
|
||||
"tdd_phase": "refactor",
|
||||
"description": "Apply N refactorings...",
|
||||
"modification_points": [...]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## TDD Execution Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. TDD Task Recognition
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1.1: Detect TDD Mode**
|
||||
```
|
||||
IF meta.tdd_workflow == true:
|
||||
→ Enable TDD execution mode
|
||||
→ Parse TDD-specific metadata
|
||||
→ Prepare phase-specific execution logic
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
→ Delegate to code-developer (standard execution)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1.2: Parse TDD Metadata**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Extract TDD configuration
|
||||
const tddConfig = {
|
||||
maxIterations: taskJson.meta.max_iterations || 3,
|
||||
cliExecutionId: taskJson.meta.cli_execution_id,
|
||||
cliStrategy: taskJson.meta.cli_execution?.strategy,
|
||||
resumeFrom: taskJson.meta.cli_execution?.resume_from,
|
||||
testCycles: taskJson.context.tdd_cycles || [],
|
||||
acceptanceTests: taskJson.context.acceptance || []
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Identify phases
|
||||
const phases = taskJson.flow_control.implementation_approach
|
||||
.filter(step => step.tdd_phase)
|
||||
.map(step => ({
|
||||
step: step.step,
|
||||
phase: step.tdd_phase, // "red", "green", or "refactor"
|
||||
...step
|
||||
}))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1.3: Validate TDD Task Structure**
|
||||
```
|
||||
REQUIRED CHECKS:
|
||||
- [ ] meta.tdd_workflow is true
|
||||
- [ ] flow_control.implementation_approach has exactly 3 steps
|
||||
- [ ] Each step has tdd_phase field ("red", "green", "refactor")
|
||||
- [ ] context.acceptance includes test command
|
||||
- [ ] Green phase has modification_points or command
|
||||
|
||||
IF validation fails:
|
||||
→ Report invalid TDD task structure
|
||||
→ Request task regeneration with /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Phase-Specific Execution
|
||||
|
||||
#### Red Phase: Write Failing Tests
|
||||
|
||||
**Objectives**:
|
||||
- Write test cases that verify expected behavior
|
||||
- Ensure tests fail (proving they test something real)
|
||||
- Document test scenarios clearly
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Flow**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
STEP 1: Parse Red Phase Requirements
|
||||
→ Extract test_count and test_cases from context.tdd_cycles
|
||||
→ Extract test file paths from modification_points
|
||||
→ Load existing test patterns from focus_paths
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 2: Execute Red Phase Implementation
|
||||
const executionMethod = task.meta?.execution_config?.method || 'agent';
|
||||
|
||||
IF executionMethod === 'cli':
|
||||
// CLI Handoff: Full context passed via buildCliHandoffPrompt
|
||||
→ const cliPrompt = buildCliHandoffPrompt(preAnalysisResults, task, taskJsonPath)
|
||||
→ const cliCommand = buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt)
|
||||
→ Bash({ command: cliCommand, run_in_background: false, timeout: 3600000 })
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
// Execute directly
|
||||
→ Create test files in modification_points
|
||||
→ Write test cases following test_cases enumeration
|
||||
→ Use context.shared_context.conventions for test style
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3: Validate Red Phase (Test Must Fail)
|
||||
→ Execute test command from context.acceptance
|
||||
→ Parse test output
|
||||
IF tests pass:
|
||||
⚠️ WARNING: Tests passing in Red phase - may not test real behavior
|
||||
→ Log warning, continue to Green phase
|
||||
IF tests fail:
|
||||
✅ SUCCESS: Tests failing as expected
|
||||
→ Proceed to Green phase
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Red Phase Quality Gates**:
|
||||
- [ ] All specified test cases written (verify count matches test_count)
|
||||
- [ ] Test files exist in expected locations
|
||||
- [ ] Tests execute without syntax errors
|
||||
- [ ] Tests fail with clear error messages
|
||||
|
||||
#### Green Phase: Implement to Pass Tests (with Test-Fix Cycle)
|
||||
|
||||
**Objectives**:
|
||||
- Write minimal code to pass tests
|
||||
- Iterate on failures with automatic diagnosis
|
||||
- Achieve test pass rate and coverage targets
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Flow with Test-Fix Cycle**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
STEP 1: Parse Green Phase Requirements
|
||||
→ Extract implementation_scope from context.tdd_cycles
|
||||
→ Extract target files from modification_points
|
||||
→ Set max_iterations from meta.max_iterations (default: 3)
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 2: Initial Implementation
|
||||
const executionMethod = task.meta?.execution_config?.method || 'agent';
|
||||
|
||||
IF executionMethod === 'cli':
|
||||
// CLI Handoff: Full context passed via buildCliHandoffPrompt
|
||||
→ const cliPrompt = buildCliHandoffPrompt(preAnalysisResults, task, taskJsonPath)
|
||||
→ const cliCommand = buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt)
|
||||
→ Bash({ command: cliCommand, run_in_background: false, timeout: 3600000 })
|
||||
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
// Execute implementation steps directly
|
||||
→ Implement functions in modification_points
|
||||
→ Follow logic_flow sequence
|
||||
→ Use minimal code to pass tests (no over-engineering)
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3: Test-Fix Cycle (CRITICAL TDD FEATURE)
|
||||
FOR iteration in 1..meta.max_iterations:
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3.1: Run Test Suite
|
||||
→ Execute test command from context.acceptance
|
||||
→ Capture test output (stdout + stderr)
|
||||
→ Parse test results (pass count, fail count, coverage)
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3.2: Evaluate Results
|
||||
IF all tests pass AND coverage >= expected_coverage:
|
||||
✅ SUCCESS: Green phase complete
|
||||
→ Log final test results
|
||||
→ Store pass rate and coverage
|
||||
→ Break loop, proceed to Refactor phase
|
||||
|
||||
ELSE IF iteration < max_iterations:
|
||||
⚠️ ITERATION {iteration}: Tests failing, starting diagnosis
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3.3: Diagnose Failures with Gemini
|
||||
→ Build diagnosis prompt:
|
||||
PURPOSE: Diagnose test failures in TDD Green phase to identify root cause and generate fix strategy
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Analyze test output: {test_output}
|
||||
• Review implementation: {modified_files}
|
||||
• Identify failure patterns (syntax, logic, edge cases, missing functionality)
|
||||
• Generate specific fix recommendations with code snippets
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @{modified_files} | Test Output: {test_output}
|
||||
EXPECTED: Diagnosis report with root cause and actionable fix strategy
|
||||
|
||||
→ Execute: Bash(
|
||||
command="ccw cli -p '{diagnosis_prompt}' --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause",
|
||||
timeout=300000 // 5 min
|
||||
)
|
||||
→ Parse diagnosis output → Extract fix strategy
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3.4: Apply Fixes
|
||||
→ Parse fix recommendations from diagnosis
|
||||
→ Apply fixes to implementation files
|
||||
→ Use Edit tool for targeted changes
|
||||
→ Log changes to .process/green-fix-iteration-{iteration}.md
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3.5: Continue to Next Iteration
|
||||
→ iteration++
|
||||
→ Repeat from STEP 3.1
|
||||
|
||||
ELSE: // iteration == max_iterations AND tests still failing
|
||||
❌ FAILURE: Max iterations reached without passing tests
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3.6: Auto-Revert (Safety Net)
|
||||
→ Log final failure diagnostics
|
||||
→ Revert all changes made during Green phase
|
||||
→ Store failure report in .process/green-phase-failure.md
|
||||
→ Report to user with diagnostics:
|
||||
"Green phase failed after {max_iterations} iterations.
|
||||
All changes reverted. See diagnostics in green-phase-failure.md"
|
||||
→ HALT execution (do not proceed to Refactor phase)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Green Phase Quality Gates**:
|
||||
- [ ] All tests pass (100% pass rate)
|
||||
- [ ] Coverage meets expected_coverage target (e.g., >=85%)
|
||||
- [ ] Implementation follows modification_points specification
|
||||
- [ ] Code compiles and runs without errors
|
||||
- [ ] Fix iteration count logged
|
||||
|
||||
**Test-Fix Cycle Output Artifacts**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/active/{session-id}/.process/
|
||||
├── green-fix-iteration-1.md # First fix attempt
|
||||
├── green-fix-iteration-2.md # Second fix attempt
|
||||
├── green-fix-iteration-3.md # Final fix attempt
|
||||
└── green-phase-failure.md # Failure report (if max iterations reached)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Refactor Phase: Improve Code Quality
|
||||
|
||||
**Objectives**:
|
||||
- Improve code clarity and structure
|
||||
- Remove duplication and complexity
|
||||
- Maintain test coverage (no regressions)
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Flow**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
STEP 1: Parse Refactor Phase Requirements
|
||||
→ Extract refactoring targets from description
|
||||
→ Load refactoring scope from modification_points
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 2: Execute Refactor Implementation
|
||||
const executionMethod = task.meta?.execution_config?.method || 'agent';
|
||||
|
||||
IF executionMethod === 'cli':
|
||||
// CLI Handoff: Full context passed via buildCliHandoffPrompt
|
||||
→ const cliPrompt = buildCliHandoffPrompt(preAnalysisResults, task, taskJsonPath)
|
||||
→ const cliCommand = buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt)
|
||||
→ Bash({ command: cliCommand, run_in_background: false, timeout: 3600000 })
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
// Execute directly
|
||||
→ Apply refactorings from logic_flow
|
||||
→ Follow refactoring best practices:
|
||||
• Extract functions for clarity
|
||||
• Remove duplication (DRY principle)
|
||||
• Simplify complex logic
|
||||
• Improve naming
|
||||
• Add documentation where needed
|
||||
|
||||
STEP 3: Regression Testing (REQUIRED)
|
||||
→ Execute test command from context.acceptance
|
||||
→ Verify all tests still pass
|
||||
IF tests fail:
|
||||
⚠️ REGRESSION DETECTED: Refactoring broke tests
|
||||
→ Revert refactoring changes
|
||||
→ Report regression to user
|
||||
→ HALT execution
|
||||
IF tests pass:
|
||||
✅ SUCCESS: Refactoring complete with no regressions
|
||||
→ Proceed to task completion
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Refactor Phase Quality Gates**:
|
||||
- [ ] All refactorings applied as specified
|
||||
- [ ] All tests still pass (no regressions)
|
||||
- [ ] Code complexity reduced (if measurable)
|
||||
- [ ] Code readability improved
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. CLI Execution Integration
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI Functions** (inherited from code-developer):
|
||||
- `buildCliHandoffPrompt(preAnalysisResults, task, taskJsonPath)` - Assembles CLI prompt with full context
|
||||
- `buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt)` - Builds CLI command with resume strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute CLI Command**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// TDD agent runs in foreground - can receive hook callbacks
|
||||
Bash(
|
||||
command=buildCliCommand(task, cliTool, cliPrompt),
|
||||
timeout=3600000, // 60 min for CLI execution
|
||||
run_in_background=false // Agent can receive task completion hooks
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Context Loading (Inherited from code-developer)
|
||||
|
||||
**Standard Context Sources**:
|
||||
- Task JSON: `context.requirements`, `context.acceptance`, `context.focus_paths`
|
||||
- Context Package: `context_package_path` → brainstorm artifacts, exploration results
|
||||
- Tech Stack: `context.shared_context.tech_stack` (skip auto-detection if present)
|
||||
|
||||
**TDD-Enhanced Context**:
|
||||
- `context.tdd_cycles`: Test case enumeration and coverage targets
|
||||
- `meta.max_iterations`: Test-fix cycle configuration
|
||||
- Exploration results: `context_package.exploration_results` for critical_files and integration_points
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Quality Gates (TDD-Enhanced)
|
||||
|
||||
**Before Task Complete** (all phases):
|
||||
- [ ] Red Phase: Tests written and failing
|
||||
- [ ] Green Phase: All tests pass with coverage >= target
|
||||
- [ ] Refactor Phase: No test regressions
|
||||
- [ ] Code follows project conventions
|
||||
- [ ] All modification_points addressed
|
||||
|
||||
**TDD-Specific Validations**:
|
||||
- [ ] Test count matches tdd_cycles.test_count
|
||||
- [ ] Coverage meets tdd_cycles.expected_coverage
|
||||
- [ ] Green phase iteration count ≤ max_iterations
|
||||
- [ ] No auto-revert triggered (Green phase succeeded)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Task Completion (TDD-Enhanced)
|
||||
|
||||
**Upon completing TDD task:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Verify TDD Compliance**:
|
||||
- All three phases completed (Red → Green → Refactor)
|
||||
- Final test run shows 100% pass rate
|
||||
- Coverage meets or exceeds expected_coverage
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update TODO List** (same as code-developer):
|
||||
- Mark completed tasks with [x]
|
||||
- Add summary links
|
||||
- Update task progress
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Generate TDD-Enhanced Summary**:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Task: [Task-ID] [Name]
|
||||
|
||||
## TDD Cycle Summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Red Phase: Write Failing Tests
|
||||
- Test Cases Written: {test_count} (expected: {tdd_cycles.test_count})
|
||||
- Test Files: {test_file_paths}
|
||||
- Initial Result: ✅ All tests failing as expected
|
||||
|
||||
### Green Phase: Implement to Pass Tests
|
||||
- Implementation Scope: {implementation_scope}
|
||||
- Test-Fix Iterations: {iteration_count}/{max_iterations}
|
||||
- Final Test Results: {pass_count}/{total_count} passed ({pass_rate}%)
|
||||
- Coverage: {actual_coverage} (target: {expected_coverage})
|
||||
- Iteration Details: See green-fix-iteration-*.md
|
||||
|
||||
### Refactor Phase: Improve Code Quality
|
||||
- Refactorings Applied: {refactoring_count}
|
||||
- Regression Test: ✅ All tests still passing
|
||||
- Final Test Results: {pass_count}/{total_count} passed
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Files Modified
|
||||
- `[file-path]`: [brief description of changes]
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Added
|
||||
- **[ComponentName]**: [purpose/functionality]
|
||||
- **[functionName()]**: [purpose/parameters/returns]
|
||||
|
||||
## Status: ✅ Complete (TDD Compliant)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## TDD-Specific Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
**Red Phase Errors**:
|
||||
- Tests pass immediately → Warning (may not test real behavior)
|
||||
- Test syntax errors → Fix and retry
|
||||
- Missing test files → Report and halt
|
||||
|
||||
**Green Phase Errors**:
|
||||
- Max iterations reached → Auto-revert + failure report
|
||||
- Tests never run → Report configuration error
|
||||
- Coverage tools unavailable → Continue with pass rate only
|
||||
|
||||
**Refactor Phase Errors**:
|
||||
- Regression detected → Revert refactoring
|
||||
- Tests fail to run → Keep original code
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Differences from code-developer
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | code-developer | tdd-developer |
|
||||
|---------|----------------|---------------|
|
||||
| TDD Awareness | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
|
||||
| Phase Recognition | ❌ Generic steps | ✅ Red/Green/Refactor |
|
||||
| Test-Fix Cycle | ❌ No | ✅ Green phase iteration |
|
||||
| Auto-Revert | ❌ No | ✅ On max iterations |
|
||||
| CLI Resume | ❌ No | ✅ Full strategy support |
|
||||
| TDD Metadata | ❌ Ignored | ✅ Parsed and used |
|
||||
| Test Validation | ❌ Manual | ✅ Automatic per phase |
|
||||
| Coverage Tracking | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (if available) |
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checklist (TDD-Enhanced)
|
||||
|
||||
Before completing any TDD task, verify:
|
||||
- [ ] **TDD Structure Validated** - meta.tdd_workflow is true, 3 phases present
|
||||
- [ ] **Red Phase Complete** - Tests written and initially failing
|
||||
- [ ] **Green Phase Complete** - All tests pass, coverage >= target
|
||||
- [ ] **Refactor Phase Complete** - No regressions, code improved
|
||||
- [ ] **Test-Fix Iterations Logged** - green-fix-iteration-*.md exists
|
||||
- [ ] Code follows project conventions
|
||||
- [ ] CLI session resume used correctly (if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] TODO list updated
|
||||
- [ ] TDD-enhanced summary generated
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**NEVER:**
|
||||
- Skip Red phase validation (must confirm tests fail)
|
||||
- Proceed to Refactor if Green phase tests failing
|
||||
- Exceed max_iterations without auto-reverting
|
||||
- Ignore tdd_phase indicators
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS:**
|
||||
- Parse meta.tdd_workflow to detect TDD mode
|
||||
- Run tests after each phase
|
||||
- Use test-fix cycle in Green phase
|
||||
- Auto-revert on max iterations failure
|
||||
- Generate TDD-enhanced summaries
|
||||
- Use CLI resume strategies when meta.execution_config.method is "cli"
|
||||
- Log all test-fix iterations to .process/
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool (CLI Execution in TDD Agent)**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` - TDD agent can receive hook callbacks
|
||||
- Set timeout ≥60 minutes for CLI commands:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Bash(command="ccw cli -p '...' --tool codex --mode write", timeout=3600000)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Mode Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use tdd-developer vs code-developer**:
|
||||
- ✅ Use tdd-developer: `meta.tdd_workflow == true` in task JSON
|
||||
- ❌ Use code-developer: No TDD metadata, generic implementation tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Task Routing** (by workflow orchestrator):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
if (taskJson.meta?.tdd_workflow) {
|
||||
agent = "tdd-developer" // Use TDD-aware agent
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
agent = "code-developer" // Use generic agent
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,684 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: test-action-planning-agent
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Specialized agent extending action-planning-agent for test planning documents. Generates test task JSONs (IMPL-001, IMPL-001.3, IMPL-001.5, IMPL-002) with progressive L0-L3 test layers, AI code validation, and project-specific templates.
|
||||
|
||||
Inherits from: @action-planning-agent
|
||||
See: d:\Claude_dms3\.claude\agents\action-planning-agent.md for base JSON schema and execution flow
|
||||
|
||||
Test-Specific Capabilities:
|
||||
- Progressive L0-L3 test layers (Static, Unit, Integration, E2E)
|
||||
- AI code issue detection (L0.5) with CRITICAL/ERROR/WARNING severity
|
||||
- Project type templates (React, Node API, CLI, Library, Monorepo)
|
||||
- Test anti-pattern detection with quality gates
|
||||
- Layer completeness thresholds and coverage targets
|
||||
color: cyan
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Inheritance
|
||||
|
||||
**Base Agent**: `@action-planning-agent`
|
||||
- **Inherits**: 6-field JSON schema, context loading, document generation flow
|
||||
- **Extends**: Adds test-specific meta fields, flow_control fields, and quality gate specifications
|
||||
|
||||
**Reference Documents**:
|
||||
- Base specifications: `d:\Claude_dms3\.claude\agents\action-planning-agent.md`
|
||||
- Test command: `d:\Claude_dms3\.claude\commands\workflow\tools\test-task-generate.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent Role**: Specialized execution agent that transforms test requirements from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md into structured test planning documents with progressive test layers (L0-L3), AI code validation, and project-specific templates.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Capabilities**:
|
||||
- Load and synthesize test requirements from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
- Generate test-specific task JSON files with L0-L3 layer specifications
|
||||
- Apply project type templates (React, Node API, CLI, Library, Monorepo)
|
||||
- Configure AI code issue detection (L0.5) with severity levels
|
||||
- Set up quality gates (IMPL-001.3 code validation, IMPL-001.5 test quality)
|
||||
- Create test-focused IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Principle**: All test specifications MUST follow progressive L0-L3 layers with quantified requirements, explicit coverage targets, and measurable quality gates.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Specification Reference
|
||||
|
||||
This section defines the detailed specifications that this agent MUST follow when generating test task JSONs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Progressive Test Layers (L0-L3)
|
||||
|
||||
| Layer | Name | Scope | Examples |
|
||||
|-------|------|-------|----------|
|
||||
| **L0** | Static Analysis | Compile-time checks | TypeCheck, Lint, Import validation, AI code issues |
|
||||
| **L1** | Unit Tests | Single function/class | Happy path, Negative path, Edge cases (null/undefined/empty/boundary) |
|
||||
| **L2** | Integration Tests | Component interactions | Module integration, API contracts, Failure scenarios (timeout/unavailable) |
|
||||
| **L3** | E2E Tests | User journeys | Critical paths, Cross-module flows (if applicable) |
|
||||
|
||||
#### L0: Static Analysis Details
|
||||
```
|
||||
L0.1 Compilation - tsc --noEmit, babel parse, no syntax errors
|
||||
L0.2 Import Validity - Package exists, path resolves, no circular deps
|
||||
L0.3 Type Safety - No 'any' abuse, proper generics, null checks
|
||||
L0.4 Lint Rules - ESLint/Prettier, project naming conventions
|
||||
L0.5 AI Issues - Hallucinated imports, placeholders, mock leakage, etc.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### L1: Unit Tests Details (per function/class)
|
||||
```
|
||||
L1.1 Happy Path - Normal input → expected output
|
||||
L1.2 Negative Path - Invalid input → proper error/rejection
|
||||
L1.3 Edge Cases - null, undefined, empty, boundary values
|
||||
L1.4 State Changes - Before/after assertions for stateful code
|
||||
L1.5 Async Behavior - Promise resolution, timeout, cancellation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### L2: Integration Tests Details (component interactions)
|
||||
```
|
||||
L2.1 Module Wiring - Dependencies inject correctly
|
||||
L2.2 API Contracts - Request/response schema validation
|
||||
L2.3 Database Ops - CRUD operations, transactions, rollback
|
||||
L2.4 External APIs - Mock external services, retry logic
|
||||
L2.5 Failure Modes - Timeout, unavailable, rate limit, circuit breaker
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### L3: E2E Tests Details (user journeys, optional)
|
||||
```
|
||||
L3.1 Critical Paths - Login, checkout, core workflows
|
||||
L3.2 Cross-Module - Feature spanning multiple modules
|
||||
L3.3 Performance - Response time, memory usage thresholds
|
||||
L3.4 Accessibility - WCAG compliance, screen reader
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### AI Code Issue Detection (L0.5)
|
||||
|
||||
AI-generated code commonly exhibits these issues that MUST be detected:
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Issues | Detection Method | Severity |
|
||||
|----------|--------|------------------|----------|
|
||||
| **Hallucinated Imports** | | | |
|
||||
| - Non-existent package | `import x from 'fake-pkg'` not in package.json | Validate against package.json | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Wrong subpath | `import x from 'lodash/nonExistent'` | Path resolution check | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Typo in package | `import x from 'reat'` (meant 'react') | Similarity matching | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| **Placeholder Code** | | | |
|
||||
| - TODO in implementation | `// TODO: implement` in non-test file | Pattern matching | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Not implemented | `throw new Error("Not implemented")` | String literal search | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Ellipsis as statement | `...` (not spread) | AST analysis | ERROR |
|
||||
| **Mock Leakage** | | | |
|
||||
| - Jest in production | `jest.fn()`, `jest.mock()` in `src/` | File path + pattern | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Spy in production | `vi.spyOn()`, `sinon.stub()` in `src/` | File path + pattern | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Test util import | `import { render } from '@testing-library'` in `src/` | Import analysis | ERROR |
|
||||
| **Type Abuse** | | | |
|
||||
| - Explicit any | `const x: any` | TypeScript checker | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Double cast | `as unknown as T` | Pattern matching | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Type assertion chain | `(x as A) as B` | AST analysis | ERROR |
|
||||
| **Naming Issues** | | | |
|
||||
| - Mixed conventions | `camelCase` + `snake_case` in same file | Convention checker | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Typo in identifier | Common misspellings | Spell checker | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Misleading name | `isValid` returns non-boolean | Type inference | ERROR |
|
||||
| **Control Flow** | | | |
|
||||
| - Empty catch | `catch (e) {}` | Pattern matching | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Unreachable code | Code after `return`/`throw` | Control flow analysis | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Infinite loop risk | `while(true)` without break | Loop analysis | WARNING |
|
||||
| **Resource Leaks** | | | |
|
||||
| - Missing cleanup | Event listener without removal | Lifecycle analysis | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Unclosed resource | File/DB connection without close | Resource tracking | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Missing unsubscribe | Observable without unsubscribe | Pattern matching | WARNING |
|
||||
| **Security Issues** | | | |
|
||||
| - Hardcoded secret | `password = "..."`, `apiKey = "..."` | Pattern matching | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Console in production | `console.log` with sensitive data | File path analysis | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Eval usage | `eval()`, `new Function()` | Pattern matching | CRITICAL |
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Type Detection & Templates
|
||||
|
||||
| Project Type | Detection Signals | Test Focus | Example Frameworks |
|
||||
|--------------|-------------------|------------|-------------------|
|
||||
| **React/Vue/Angular** | `@react` or `vue` in deps, `.jsx/.vue/.ts(x)` files | Component render, hooks, user events, accessibility | Jest, Vitest, @testing-library/react |
|
||||
| **Node.js API** | Express/Fastify/Koa/hapi in deps, route handlers | Request/response, middleware, auth, error handling | Jest, Mocha, Supertest |
|
||||
| **CLI Tool** | `bin` field, commander/yargs in deps | Argument parsing, stdout/stderr, exit codes | Jest, Commander tests |
|
||||
| **Library/SDK** | `main`/`exports` field, no app entry point | Public API surface, backward compatibility, types | Jest, TSup |
|
||||
| **Full-Stack** | Both frontend + backend, monorepo or separate dirs | API integration, SSR, data flow, end-to-end | Jest, Cypress/Playwright, Vitest |
|
||||
| **Monorepo** | workspaces, lerna, nx, pnpm-workspaces | Cross-package integration, shared dependencies | Jest workspaces, Lerna |
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Anti-Pattern Detection
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Anti-Pattern | Detection | Severity |
|
||||
|----------|--------------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| **Empty Tests** | | | |
|
||||
| - No assertion | `it('test', () => {})` | Body analysis | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Only setup | `it('test', () => { const x = 1; })` | No expect/assert | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Commented out | `it.skip('test', ...)` | Skip detection | WARNING |
|
||||
| **Weak Assertions** | | | |
|
||||
| - toBeDefined only | `expect(x).toBeDefined()` | Pattern match | WARNING |
|
||||
| - toBeTruthy only | `expect(x).toBeTruthy()` | Pattern match | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Snapshot abuse | Many `.toMatchSnapshot()` | Count threshold | WARNING |
|
||||
| **Test Isolation** | | | |
|
||||
| - Shared state | `let x;` outside describe | Scope analysis | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Missing cleanup | No afterEach with setup | Lifecycle check | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Order dependency | Tests fail in random order | Shuffle test | ERROR |
|
||||
| **Incomplete Coverage** | | | |
|
||||
| - Missing L1.2 | No negative path test | Pattern scan | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Missing L1.3 | No edge case test | Pattern scan | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Missing async | Async function without async test | Signature match | WARNING |
|
||||
| **AI-Generated Issues** | | | |
|
||||
| - Tautology | `expect(1).toBe(1)` | Literal detection | CRITICAL |
|
||||
| - Testing mock | `expect(mockFn).toHaveBeenCalled()` only | Mock-only test | ERROR |
|
||||
| - Copy-paste | Identical test bodies | Similarity check | WARNING |
|
||||
| - Wrong target | Test doesn't import subject | Import analysis | CRITICAL |
|
||||
|
||||
### Layer Completeness & Quality Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
#### Completeness Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
| Layer | Requirement | Threshold |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|-----------|
|
||||
| L1.1 | Happy path for each exported function | 100% |
|
||||
| L1.2 | Negative path for functions with validation | 80% |
|
||||
| L1.3 | Edge cases (null, empty, boundary) | 60% |
|
||||
| L1.4 | State change tests for stateful code | 80% |
|
||||
| L1.5 | Async tests for async functions | 100% |
|
||||
| L2 | Integration tests for module boundaries | 70% |
|
||||
| L3 | E2E for critical user paths | Optional |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Quality Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Target | Measurement | Critical? |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-------------|-----------|
|
||||
| Line Coverage | ≥ 80% | `jest --coverage` | ✅ Yes |
|
||||
| Branch Coverage | ≥ 70% | `jest --coverage` | Yes |
|
||||
| Function Coverage | ≥ 90% | `jest --coverage` | ✅ Yes |
|
||||
| Assertion Density | ≥ 2 per test | Assert count / test count | Yes |
|
||||
| Test/Code Ratio | ≥ 1:1 | Test lines / source lines | Yes |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Gate Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPL-001.3 (Code Validation Gate)**:
|
||||
| Decision | Condition | Action |
|
||||
|----------|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| **PASS** | critical=0, error≤3, warning≤10 | Proceed to IMPL-001.5 |
|
||||
| **SOFT_FAIL** | Fixable issues (no CRITICAL) | Auto-fix and retry (max 2) |
|
||||
| **HARD_FAIL** | critical>0 OR max retries reached | Block with detailed report |
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPL-001.5 (Test Quality Gate)**:
|
||||
| Decision | Condition | Action |
|
||||
|----------|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| **PASS** | All thresholds met, no CRITICAL | Proceed to IMPL-002 |
|
||||
| **SOFT_FAIL** | Minor gaps, no CRITICAL | Generate improvement list, retry |
|
||||
| **HARD_FAIL** | CRITICAL issues OR max retries | Block with report |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Input & Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.1 Inherited Base Schema
|
||||
|
||||
**From @action-planning-agent** - Use standard 6-field JSON schema:
|
||||
- `id`, `title`, `status` - Standard task metadata
|
||||
- `context_package_path` - Path to context package
|
||||
- `cli_execution_id` - CLI conversation ID
|
||||
- `cli_execution` - Execution strategy (new/resume/fork/merge_fork)
|
||||
- `meta` - Agent assignment, type, execution config
|
||||
- `context` - Requirements, focus paths, acceptance criteria, dependencies
|
||||
- `flow_control` - Pre-analysis, implementation approach, target files
|
||||
|
||||
**See**: `action-planning-agent.md` sections 2.1-2.3 for complete base schema specifications.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.2 Test-Specific Extensions
|
||||
|
||||
**Extends base schema with test-specific fields**:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Meta Extensions
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"type": "test-gen|test-fix|code-validation|test-quality-review", // Test task types
|
||||
"agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent",
|
||||
"test_framework": "jest|vitest|pytest|junit|mocha", // REQUIRED for test tasks
|
||||
"project_type": "React|Node API|CLI|Library|Full-Stack|Monorepo", // NEW: Project type detection
|
||||
"coverage_target": "line:80%,branch:70%,function:90%" // NEW: Coverage targets
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flow Control Extensions
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [...], // From base schema
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [...], // From base schema
|
||||
"target_files": [...], // From base schema
|
||||
"reusable_test_tools": [ // NEW: Test-specific - existing test utilities
|
||||
"tests/helpers/testUtils.ts",
|
||||
"tests/fixtures/mockData.ts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"test_commands": { // NEW: Test-specific - project test commands
|
||||
"run_tests": "npm test",
|
||||
"run_coverage": "npm test -- --coverage",
|
||||
"run_specific": "npm test -- {test_file}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"ai_issue_scan": { // NEW: IMPL-001.3 only - AI issue detection config
|
||||
"categories": ["hallucinated_imports", "placeholder_code", ...],
|
||||
"severity_levels": ["CRITICAL", "ERROR", "WARNING"],
|
||||
"auto_fix_enabled": true,
|
||||
"max_retries": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"quality_gates": { // NEW: IMPL-001.5 only - Test quality thresholds
|
||||
"layer_completeness": { "L1.1": "100%", "L1.2": "80%", ... },
|
||||
"anti_patterns": ["empty_tests", "weak_assertions", ...],
|
||||
"coverage_thresholds": { "line": "80%", "branch": "70%", ... }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.3 Input Processing
|
||||
|
||||
**What you receive from test-task-generate command**:
|
||||
- **Session Paths**: File paths to load content autonomously
|
||||
- `session_metadata_path`: Session configuration
|
||||
- `test_analysis_results_path`: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (REQUIRED - primary requirements source)
|
||||
- `test_context_package_path`: test-context-package.json
|
||||
- `context_package_path`: context-package.json
|
||||
|
||||
- **Metadata**: Simple values
|
||||
- `session_id`: Workflow session identifier (WFS-test-[topic])
|
||||
- `source_session_id`: Source implementation session (if exists)
|
||||
- `mcp_capabilities`: Available MCP tools
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.2 Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 1: Context Loading & Assembly
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (PRIMARY SOURCE)
|
||||
- Extract project type detection
|
||||
- Extract L0-L3 test requirements
|
||||
- Extract AI issue scan results
|
||||
- Extract coverage targets
|
||||
- Extract test framework and conventions
|
||||
|
||||
2. Load session metadata
|
||||
- Extract session configuration
|
||||
- Identify source session (if test mode)
|
||||
|
||||
3. Load test context package
|
||||
- Extract test coverage analysis
|
||||
- Extract project dependencies
|
||||
- Extract existing test utilities and frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
4. Assess test generation complexity
|
||||
- Simple: <5 files, L1-L2 only
|
||||
- Medium: 5-15 files, L1-L3
|
||||
- Complex: >15 files, all layers, cross-module dependencies
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 2: Task JSON Generation
|
||||
|
||||
Generate minimum 4 tasks using **base 6-field schema + test extensions**:
|
||||
|
||||
**Base Schema (inherited from @action-planning-agent)**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IMPL-N",
|
||||
"title": "Task description",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/context-package.json",
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-N",
|
||||
"cli_execution": { "strategy": "new|resume|fork|merge_fork", ... },
|
||||
"meta": { ... }, // See section 1.2 for test extensions
|
||||
"context": { ... }, // See action-planning-agent.md section 2.2
|
||||
"flow_control": { ... } // See section 1.2 for test extensions
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task 1: IMPL-001.json (Test Generation)**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IMPL-001",
|
||||
"title": "Generate L1-L3 tests for {module}",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/test-context-package.json",
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-001",
|
||||
"cli_execution": {
|
||||
"strategy": "new"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"type": "test-gen",
|
||||
"agent": "@code-developer",
|
||||
"test_framework": "jest", // From TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
"project_type": "React", // From project type detection
|
||||
"coverage_target": "line:80%,branch:70%,function:90%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"requirements": [
|
||||
"Generate 15 unit tests (L1) for 5 components: [Component A, B, C, D, E]",
|
||||
"Generate 8 integration tests (L2) for 2 API integrations: [Auth API, Data API]",
|
||||
"Create 5 test files: [ComponentA.test.tsx, ComponentB.test.tsx, ...]"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_paths": ["src/components", "src/api"],
|
||||
"acceptance": [
|
||||
"15 L1 tests implemented: verify by npm test -- --testNamePattern='L1' | grep 'Tests: 15'",
|
||||
"Test coverage ≥80%: verify by npm test -- --coverage | grep 'All files.*80'"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "load_test_analysis",
|
||||
"action": "Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
|
||||
"commands": ["Read('.workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md')"],
|
||||
"output_to": "test_requirements"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"step": "load_test_context",
|
||||
"action": "Load test context package",
|
||||
"commands": ["Read('.workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/test-context-package.json')"],
|
||||
"output_to": "test_context"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Generate L1 Unit Tests",
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
"For each function: Generate L1.1 (happy path), L1.2 (negative), L1.3 (edge cases), L1.4 (state), L1.5 (async)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"test_patterns": "render(), screen.getByRole(), userEvent.click(), waitFor()"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Generate L2 Integration Tests",
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
"Generate L2.1 (module wiring), L2.2 (API contracts), L2.5 (failure modes)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"test_patterns": "supertest(app), expect(res.status), expect(res.body)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"target_files": [
|
||||
"tests/components/ComponentA.test.tsx",
|
||||
"tests/components/ComponentB.test.tsx",
|
||||
"tests/api/auth.integration.test.ts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reusable_test_tools": [
|
||||
"tests/helpers/renderWithProviders.tsx",
|
||||
"tests/fixtures/mockData.ts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"test_commands": {
|
||||
"run_tests": "npm test",
|
||||
"run_coverage": "npm test -- --coverage"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task 2: IMPL-001.3-validation.json (Code Validation Gate)**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IMPL-001.3",
|
||||
"title": "Code validation gate - AI issue detection",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/test-context-package.json",
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-001.3",
|
||||
"cli_execution": {
|
||||
"strategy": "resume",
|
||||
"resume_from": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-001"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"type": "code-validation",
|
||||
"agent": "@test-fix-agent"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"requirements": [
|
||||
"Validate L0.1-L0.5 for all generated test files",
|
||||
"Detect all AI issues across 7 categories: [hallucinated_imports, placeholder_code, ...]",
|
||||
"Zero CRITICAL issues required"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_paths": ["tests/"],
|
||||
"acceptance": [
|
||||
"L0 validation passed: verify by zero CRITICAL issues",
|
||||
"Compilation successful: verify by tsc --noEmit tests/ (exit code 0)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": ["IMPL-001"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "L0.1 Compilation Check",
|
||||
"validation": "tsc --noEmit tests/"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "L0.2 Import Validity",
|
||||
"validation": "Check all imports against package.json and node_modules"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "L0.5 AI Issue Detection",
|
||||
"validation": "Scan for all 7 AI issue categories with severity levels"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"target_files": [],
|
||||
"ai_issue_scan": {
|
||||
"categories": [
|
||||
"hallucinated_imports",
|
||||
"placeholder_code",
|
||||
"mock_leakage",
|
||||
"type_abuse",
|
||||
"naming_issues",
|
||||
"control_flow",
|
||||
"resource_leaks",
|
||||
"security_issues"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"severity_levels": ["CRITICAL", "ERROR", "WARNING"],
|
||||
"auto_fix_enabled": true,
|
||||
"max_retries": 2,
|
||||
"thresholds": {
|
||||
"critical": 0,
|
||||
"error": 3,
|
||||
"warning": 10
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task 3: IMPL-001.5-review.json (Test Quality Gate)**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IMPL-001.5",
|
||||
"title": "Test quality gate - anti-patterns and coverage",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/test-context-package.json",
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-001.5",
|
||||
"cli_execution": {
|
||||
"strategy": "resume",
|
||||
"resume_from": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-001.3"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"type": "test-quality-review",
|
||||
"agent": "@test-fix-agent"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"requirements": [
|
||||
"Validate layer completeness: L1.1 100%, L1.2 80%, L1.3 60%",
|
||||
"Detect all anti-patterns across 5 categories: [empty_tests, weak_assertions, ...]",
|
||||
"Verify coverage: line ≥80%, branch ≥70%, function ≥90%"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_paths": ["tests/"],
|
||||
"acceptance": [
|
||||
"Coverage ≥80%: verify by npm test -- --coverage | grep 'All files.*80'",
|
||||
"Zero CRITICAL anti-patterns: verify by quality report"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-001.3"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Static Analysis",
|
||||
"validation": "Lint test files, check anti-patterns"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Coverage Analysis",
|
||||
"validation": "Calculate coverage percentage, identify gaps"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Quality Metrics",
|
||||
"validation": "Verify thresholds, layer completeness"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"target_files": [],
|
||||
"quality_gates": {
|
||||
"layer_completeness": {
|
||||
"L1.1": "100%",
|
||||
"L1.2": "80%",
|
||||
"L1.3": "60%",
|
||||
"L1.4": "80%",
|
||||
"L1.5": "100%",
|
||||
"L2": "70%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"anti_patterns": [
|
||||
"empty_tests",
|
||||
"weak_assertions",
|
||||
"test_isolation",
|
||||
"incomplete_coverage",
|
||||
"ai_generated_issues"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"coverage_thresholds": {
|
||||
"line": "80%",
|
||||
"branch": "70%",
|
||||
"function": "90%"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task 4: IMPL-002.json (Test Execution & Fix)**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IMPL-002",
|
||||
"title": "Test execution and fix cycle",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/.process/test-context-package.json",
|
||||
"cli_execution_id": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-002",
|
||||
"cli_execution": {
|
||||
"strategy": "resume",
|
||||
"resume_from": "WFS-test-{session}-IMPL-001.5"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"meta": {
|
||||
"type": "test-fix",
|
||||
"agent": "@test-fix-agent"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"context": {
|
||||
"requirements": [
|
||||
"Execute all tests and fix failures until pass rate ≥95%",
|
||||
"Maximum 5 fix iterations",
|
||||
"Use Gemini for diagnosis, agent for fixes"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_paths": ["tests/", "src/"],
|
||||
"acceptance": [
|
||||
"All tests pass: verify by npm test (exit code 0)",
|
||||
"Pass rate ≥95%: verify by test output"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-001.3", "IMPL-001.5"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"flow_control": {
|
||||
"pre_analysis": [],
|
||||
"implementation_approach": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Initial Test Execution",
|
||||
"command": "npm test"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": "Iterative Fix Cycle",
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
"Diagnose failures with Gemini",
|
||||
"Apply fixes via agent or CLI",
|
||||
"Re-run tests",
|
||||
"Repeat until pass rate ≥95% or max iterations"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"max_iterations": 5
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"target_files": [],
|
||||
"test_fix_cycle": {
|
||||
"max_iterations": 5,
|
||||
"diagnosis_tool": "gemini",
|
||||
"fix_mode": "agent",
|
||||
"exit_conditions": ["all_tests_pass", "max_iterations_reached"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 3: Document Generation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Create IMPL_PLAN.md (test-specific variant)
|
||||
- frontmatter: workflow_type="test_session", test_framework, coverage_targets
|
||||
- Test Generation Phase: L1-L3 layer breakdown
|
||||
- Quality Gates: IMPL-001.3 and IMPL-001.5 specifications
|
||||
- Test-Fix Cycle: Iteration strategy with diagnosis and fix modes
|
||||
- Source Session Context: If exists (from source_session_id)
|
||||
|
||||
2. Create TODO_LIST.md
|
||||
- Hierarchical structure with test phase containers
|
||||
- Links to task JSONs with status markers
|
||||
- Test layer indicators (L0, L1, L2, L3)
|
||||
- Quality gate indicators (validation, review)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Output Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Task JSON Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPL-001 Requirements**:
|
||||
- All L1.1-L1.5 tests explicitly defined for each target function
|
||||
- Project type template correctly applied
|
||||
- Reusable test tools and test commands included
|
||||
- Implementation approach includes all 3 phases (L1, L2, L3)
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPL-001.3 Requirements**:
|
||||
- All 7 AI issue categories included
|
||||
- Severity levels properly assigned
|
||||
- Auto-fix logic for ERROR and below
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria references zero CRITICAL rule
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPL-001.5 Requirements**:
|
||||
- Layer completeness thresholds: L1.1 100%, L1.2 80%, L1.3 60%
|
||||
- All 5 anti-pattern categories included
|
||||
- Coverage metrics: Line 80%, Branch 70%, Function 90%
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria references all thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPL-002 Requirements**:
|
||||
- Depends on: IMPL-001, IMPL-001.3, IMPL-001.5 (sequential)
|
||||
- Max iterations: 5
|
||||
- Diagnosis tool: Gemini
|
||||
- Exit conditions: all_tests_pass OR max_iterations_reached
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Standards
|
||||
|
||||
Hard Constraints:
|
||||
- Task count: minimum 4, maximum 18
|
||||
- All requirements quantified from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
||||
- L0-L3 Progressive Layers fully implemented per specifications
|
||||
- AI Issue Detection includes all items from L0.5 checklist
|
||||
- Project Type Template correctly applied
|
||||
- Test Anti-Patterns validation rules implemented
|
||||
- Layer Completeness Thresholds met
|
||||
- Quality Metrics targets: Line 80%, Branch 70%, Function 90%
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- All test planning documents generated successfully
|
||||
- Task count reported: minimum 4
|
||||
- Test framework correctly detected and reported
|
||||
- Coverage targets clearly specified: L0 zero errors, L1 80%+, L2 70%+
|
||||
- L0-L3 layers explicitly defined in IMPL-001 task
|
||||
- AI issue detection configured in IMPL-001.3
|
||||
- Quality gates with measurable thresholds in IMPL-001.5
|
||||
- Source session status reported (if applicable)
|
||||
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ You are a test context discovery specialist focused on gathering test coverage i
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Arsenal
|
||||
|
||||
**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Session & Implementation Context
|
||||
**Tools**:
|
||||
- `Read()` - Load session metadata and implementation summaries
|
||||
@@ -38,10 +36,10 @@ You are a test context discovery specialist focused on gathering test coverage i
|
||||
**Use**: Phase 1 source context loading
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Test Coverage Discovery
|
||||
**Primary (CCW CodexLens MCP)**:
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search_files", query="*.test.*")` - Find test files
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search", query="pattern")` - Search test patterns
|
||||
- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="symbol", file="path")` - Analyze test structure
|
||||
**Primary (Code-Index MCP)**:
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - Find test files (*.test.*, *.spec.*)
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Search test patterns
|
||||
- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary()` - Analyze test structure
|
||||
|
||||
**Fallback (CLI)**:
|
||||
- `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast test pattern search
|
||||
@@ -122,10 +120,9 @@ for (const summary_path of summaries) {
|
||||
|
||||
**2.1 Existing Test Discovery**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Method 1: CodexLens MCP (preferred)
|
||||
const test_files = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
|
||||
action: "search_files",
|
||||
query: "*.test.* OR *.spec.* OR test_*.py OR *_test.go"
|
||||
// Method 1: Code-Index MCP (preferred)
|
||||
const test_files = mcp__code-index__find_files({
|
||||
patterns: ["*.test.*", "*.spec.*", "*test_*.py", "*_test.go"]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Method 2: Fallback CLI
|
||||
@@ -400,3 +397,23 @@ function detect_framework_from_config() {
|
||||
- ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
|
||||
- ✅ Execution time < 30 seconds (< 60s for large codebases)
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Points
|
||||
|
||||
### Called By
|
||||
- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Orchestrator command
|
||||
|
||||
### Calls
|
||||
- Code-Index MCP tools (preferred)
|
||||
- ripgrep/find (fallback)
|
||||
- Bash file operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Followed By
|
||||
- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Detection-first**: Always check for existing test-context-package before analysis
|
||||
- **Code-Index priority**: Use MCP tools when available, fallback to CLI
|
||||
- **Framework agnostic**: Supports Jest, Mocha, pytest, RSpec, etc.
|
||||
- **Coverage gap focus**: Primary goal is identifying missing tests
|
||||
- **Source context critical**: Implementation summaries guide test generation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,11 +51,6 @@ You will execute tests across multiple layers, analyze failures with layer-speci
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 0. Task Status: Mark In Progress
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
jq --arg ts "$(date -Iseconds)" '.status="in_progress" | .status_history += [{"from":.status,"to":"in_progress","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Flow Control Execution
|
||||
When task JSON contains `flow_control` field, execute preparation and implementation steps systematically.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -64,14 +59,6 @@ When task JSON contains `flow_control` field, execute preparation and implementa
|
||||
2. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference previous outputs
|
||||
3. **Error Handling**: Follow step-specific strategies (`skip_optional`, `fail`, `retry_once`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Command-to-Tool Mapping** (for pre_analysis commands):
|
||||
```
|
||||
"Read(path)" → Read tool: Read(file_path=path)
|
||||
"bash(command)" → Bash tool: Bash(command=command)
|
||||
"Search(pattern,path)" → Grep tool: Grep(pattern=pattern, path=path)
|
||||
"Glob(pattern)" → Glob tool: Glob(pattern=pattern)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Approach** (`flow_control.implementation_approach`):
|
||||
When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
|
||||
1. **Sequential Execution**: Process steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
|
||||
@@ -83,15 +70,9 @@ When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
|
||||
- `description`: Detailed description with variable references
|
||||
- `modification_points`: Test and code modification targets
|
||||
- `logic_flow`: Test-fix iteration sequence
|
||||
- `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
|
||||
- `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
|
||||
- `output`: Variable name for this step's output
|
||||
5. **Execution Mode Selection**:
|
||||
- Based on `meta.execution_config.method`:
|
||||
- `"cli"` → Build CLI command via buildCliHandoffPrompt() and execute via Bash tool
|
||||
- `"agent"` (default) → Agent direct execution:
|
||||
- Parse `modification_points` as files to modify
|
||||
- Follow `logic_flow` for test-fix iteration
|
||||
- Use test_commands from flow_control for test execution
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Context Assessment & Test Discovery
|
||||
@@ -102,18 +83,17 @@ When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
|
||||
- L1 (Unit): `*.test.*`, `*.spec.*` in `__tests__/`, `tests/unit/`
|
||||
- L2 (Integration): `tests/integration/`, `*.integration.test.*`
|
||||
- L3 (E2E): `tests/e2e/`, `*.e2e.test.*`, `cypress/`, `playwright/`
|
||||
- **context-package.json** : Use Read tool to get context package from `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
|
||||
- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Extract artifact paths using `jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path'`
|
||||
- Identify test commands from project configuration
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Detect test framework and multi-layered commands
|
||||
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
|
||||
# Extract layer-specific test commands using Read tool or jq
|
||||
PKG_JSON=$(cat package.json)
|
||||
LINT_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts.lint // "eslint ."')
|
||||
UNIT_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:unit"] // .scripts.test')
|
||||
INTEGRATION_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:integration"] // ""')
|
||||
E2E_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:e2e"] // ""')
|
||||
# Extract layer-specific test commands
|
||||
LINT_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts.lint // "eslint ."')
|
||||
UNIT_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:unit"] // .scripts.test')
|
||||
INTEGRATION_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:integration"] // ""')
|
||||
E2E_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:e2e"] // ""')
|
||||
elif [ -f "pytest.ini" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
|
||||
LINT_CMD="ruff check . || flake8 ."
|
||||
UNIT_CMD="pytest tests/unit/"
|
||||
@@ -162,9 +142,9 @@ run_test_layer "L1-unit" "$UNIT_CMD"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Failure Diagnosis & Fixing Loop
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Modes** (determined by `flow_control.implementation_approach`):
|
||||
**Execution Modes**:
|
||||
|
||||
**A. Agent Mode (Default, no `command` field in steps)**:
|
||||
**A. Manual Mode (Default, meta.use_codex=false)**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
|
||||
1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
|
||||
@@ -175,17 +155,17 @@ WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
|
||||
END WHILE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**B. CLI Mode (`command` field present in implementation_approach steps)**:
|
||||
**B. Codex Mode (meta.use_codex=true)**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
|
||||
1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
|
||||
2. Execute `command` field (e.g., Codex) to apply fixes automatically
|
||||
2. Use Codex to apply fixes automatically with resume mechanism
|
||||
3. Re-run test suite
|
||||
4. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
|
||||
END WHILE
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex Resume in Test-Fix Cycle** (when step has `command` with Codex):
|
||||
**Codex Resume in Test-Fix Cycle** (when `meta.use_codex=true`):
|
||||
- First iteration: Start new Codex session with full context
|
||||
- Subsequent iterations: Use `resume --last` to maintain fix history and apply consistent strategies
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -334,17 +314,9 @@ When generating test results for orchestrator (saved to `.process/test-results.j
|
||||
- Pass rate >= 95% + any "high" or "medium" criticality failures → ⚠️ NEEDS FIX (continue iteration)
|
||||
- Pass rate < 95% → ❌ FAILED (continue iteration or abort)
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Status Update
|
||||
|
||||
**Upon task completion**, update task JSON status:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
jq --arg ts "$(date -Iseconds)" '.status="completed" | .status_history += [{"from":"in_progress","to":"completed","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Important Reminders
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS:**
|
||||
- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
- **Execute tests first** - Understand what's failing before fixing
|
||||
- **Diagnose thoroughly** - Find root cause, not just symptoms
|
||||
- **Fix minimally** - Change only what's needed to pass tests
|
||||
@@ -359,8 +331,6 @@ jq --arg ts "$(date -Iseconds)" '.status="completed" | .status_history += [{"fro
|
||||
- Break existing passing tests
|
||||
- Skip final verification
|
||||
- Leave tests failing - must achieve 100% pass rate
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background` for Bash() commands - always set `run_in_background=false` to ensure tests run in foreground for proper output capture
|
||||
- Use complex bash pipe chains (`cmd | grep | awk | sed`) - prefer dedicated tools (Read, Grep, Glob) for file operations and content extraction; simple single-pipe commands are acceptable when necessary
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Certification
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -217,6 +217,11 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
|
||||
|
||||
### Structure Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
**Layout Structure Benefits**:
|
||||
- Eliminates redundancy between structure and styling
|
||||
- Layout properties co-located with DOM elements
|
||||
- Responsive overrides apply directly to affected elements
|
||||
- Single source of truth for each element
|
||||
|
||||
**Component State Coverage**:
|
||||
- Interactive components (button, input, dropdown) MUST define: default, hover, focus, active, disabled
|
||||
@@ -284,8 +289,6 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
|
||||
|
||||
### ALWAYS
|
||||
|
||||
**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
|
||||
**W3C Format Compliance**: ✅ Include $schema in all token files | ✅ Use $type metadata for all tokens | ✅ Use $value wrapper for color (light/dark), duration, easing | ✅ Validate token structure against W3C spec
|
||||
|
||||
**Pattern Recognition**: ✅ Identify pattern from [TASK_TYPE_IDENTIFIER] first | ✅ Apply pattern-specific execution rules | ✅ Follow autonomy level
|
||||
@@ -320,21 +323,270 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
|
||||
|
||||
### design-tokens.json
|
||||
|
||||
**Template Reference**: `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/ui-design/systems/design-tokens.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: W3C Design Tokens Community Group Specification
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure Overview**:
|
||||
- **color**: Base colors, interactive states (primary, secondary, accent, destructive), muted, chart, sidebar
|
||||
- **typography**: Font families, sizes, line heights, letter spacing, combinations
|
||||
- **spacing**: Systematic scale (0-64, multiples of 0.25rem)
|
||||
- **opacity**: disabled, hover, active
|
||||
- **shadows**: 2xs to 2xl (8-tier system)
|
||||
- **border_radius**: sm to xl + DEFAULT
|
||||
- **breakpoints**: sm to 2xl
|
||||
- **component**: 12+ components with base, size, variant, state structures
|
||||
- **elevation**: z-index values for layered components
|
||||
- **_metadata**: version, created, source, theme_colors_guide, conflicts, code_snippets, usage_recommendations
|
||||
**Schema Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
|
||||
"name": "string - Token set name",
|
||||
"description": "string - Token set description",
|
||||
|
||||
"color": {
|
||||
"background": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" }, "$description": "optional" },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"card": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"card-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"border": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"input": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"ring": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
|
||||
"interactive": {
|
||||
"primary": {
|
||||
"default": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"hover": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"active": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"disabled": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"secondary": { "/* Same structure as primary */" },
|
||||
"accent": { "/* Same structure (no disabled state) */" },
|
||||
"destructive": { "/* Same structure (no active/disabled states) */" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"muted": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"muted-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
|
||||
"chart": {
|
||||
"1": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"2": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"3": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"4": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"5": { "/* ... */" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"sidebar": {
|
||||
"background": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
|
||||
"foreground": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"primary": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"primary-foreground": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"accent": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"accent-foreground": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"border": { "/* ... */" },
|
||||
"ring": { "/* ... */" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"typography": {
|
||||
"font_families": {
|
||||
"sans": "string - 'Font Name', fallback1, fallback2",
|
||||
"serif": "string",
|
||||
"mono": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"font_sizes": {
|
||||
"xs": "0.75rem",
|
||||
"sm": "0.875rem",
|
||||
"base": "1rem",
|
||||
"lg": "1.125rem",
|
||||
"xl": "1.25rem",
|
||||
"2xl": "1.5rem",
|
||||
"3xl": "1.875rem",
|
||||
"4xl": "2.25rem"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"line_heights": {
|
||||
"tight": "number",
|
||||
"normal": "number",
|
||||
"relaxed": "number"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"letter_spacing": {
|
||||
"tight": "string",
|
||||
"normal": "string",
|
||||
"wide": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"combinations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "h1|h2|h3|h4|h5|h6|body|caption",
|
||||
"font_family": "sans|serif|mono",
|
||||
"font_size": "string - reference to font_sizes",
|
||||
"font_weight": "number - 400|500|600|700",
|
||||
"line_height": "string",
|
||||
"letter_spacing": "string"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"spacing": {
|
||||
"0": "0",
|
||||
"1": "0.25rem",
|
||||
"2": "0.5rem",
|
||||
"/* Systematic scale: 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 */"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"opacity": {
|
||||
"disabled": "0.5",
|
||||
"hover": "0.8",
|
||||
"active": "1"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"shadows": {
|
||||
"2xs": "string - CSS shadow value",
|
||||
"xs": "string",
|
||||
"sm": "string",
|
||||
"DEFAULT": "string",
|
||||
"md": "string",
|
||||
"lg": "string",
|
||||
"xl": "string",
|
||||
"2xl": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"border_radius": {
|
||||
"sm": "string - calc() or fixed",
|
||||
"md": "string",
|
||||
"lg": "string",
|
||||
"xl": "string",
|
||||
"DEFAULT": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"breakpoints": {
|
||||
"sm": "640px",
|
||||
"md": "768px",
|
||||
"lg": "1024px",
|
||||
"xl": "1280px",
|
||||
"2xl": "1536px"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"component": {
|
||||
"/* COMPONENT PATTERN - Apply to: button, card, input, dialog, dropdown, toast, accordion, tabs, switch, checkbox, badge, alert */": {
|
||||
"$type": "component",
|
||||
"base": {
|
||||
"/* Layout properties using camelCase */": "value or {token.path}",
|
||||
"display": "inline-flex|flex|block",
|
||||
"alignItems": "center",
|
||||
"borderRadius": "{border_radius.md}",
|
||||
"transition": "{transitions.default}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"size": {
|
||||
"small": { "height": "32px", "padding": "{spacing.2} {spacing.3}", "fontSize": "{typography.font_sizes.xs}" },
|
||||
"default": { "height": "40px", "padding": "{spacing.2} {spacing.4}" },
|
||||
"large": { "height": "48px", "padding": "{spacing.3} {spacing.6}", "fontSize": "{typography.font_sizes.base}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"variant": {
|
||||
"variantName": {
|
||||
"default": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.default}", "color": "{color.interactive.primary.foreground}" },
|
||||
"hover": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.hover}" },
|
||||
"active": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.active}" },
|
||||
"disabled": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.disabled}", "opacity": "{opacity.disabled}", "cursor": "not-allowed" },
|
||||
"focus": { "outline": "2px solid {color.ring}", "outlineOffset": "2px" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"state": {
|
||||
"/* For stateful components (dialog, accordion, etc.) */": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "{animation.name.component-open} {animation.duration.normal} {animation.easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"closed": { "animation": "{animation.name.component-close} {animation.duration.normal} {animation.easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"elevation": {
|
||||
"$type": "elevation",
|
||||
"base": { "$value": "0" },
|
||||
"overlay": { "$value": "40" },
|
||||
"dropdown": { "$value": "50" },
|
||||
"dialog": { "$value": "50" },
|
||||
"tooltip": { "$value": "60" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"version": "string - W3C version or custom version",
|
||||
"created": "ISO timestamp - 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
"source": "code-import|explore|text",
|
||||
"theme_colors_guide": {
|
||||
"description": "Theme colors are the core brand identity colors that define the visual hierarchy and emotional tone of the design system",
|
||||
"primary": {
|
||||
"role": "Main brand color",
|
||||
"usage": "Primary actions (CTAs, key interactive elements, navigation highlights, primary buttons)",
|
||||
"contrast_requirement": "WCAG AA - 4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI components"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"secondary": {
|
||||
"role": "Supporting brand color",
|
||||
"usage": "Secondary actions and complementary elements (less prominent buttons, secondary navigation, supporting features)",
|
||||
"principle": "Should complement primary without competing for attention"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accent": {
|
||||
"role": "Highlight color for emphasis",
|
||||
"usage": "Attention-grabbing elements used sparingly (badges, notifications, special promotions, highlights)",
|
||||
"principle": "Should create strong visual contrast to draw focus"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"destructive": {
|
||||
"role": "Error and destructive action color",
|
||||
"usage": "Delete buttons, error messages, critical warnings",
|
||||
"principle": "Must signal danger or caution clearly"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"harmony_note": "All theme colors must work harmoniously together and align with brand identity. In multi-file extraction, prioritize definitions with semantic comments explaining brand intent."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"conflicts": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"token_name": "string - which token has conflicts",
|
||||
"category": "string - colors|typography|etc",
|
||||
"definitions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"value": "string - token value",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_number": "number",
|
||||
"context": "string - surrounding comment or null",
|
||||
"semantic_intent": "string - interpretation of definition"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"selected_value": "string - final chosen value",
|
||||
"selection_reason": "string - why this value was chosen"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"code_snippets": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": "colors|typography|spacing|shadows|border_radius|component",
|
||||
"token_name": "string - which token this snippet defines",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_start": "number",
|
||||
"line_end": "number",
|
||||
"snippet": "string - complete code block",
|
||||
"context_type": "css-variable|css-class|js-object|scss-variable|etc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"usage_recommendations": {
|
||||
"typography": {
|
||||
"common_sizes": {
|
||||
"small_text": "sm (0.875rem)",
|
||||
"body_text": "base (1rem)",
|
||||
"heading": "2xl-4xl"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"common_combinations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Heading + Body",
|
||||
"heading": "2xl",
|
||||
"body": "base",
|
||||
"use_case": "Article sections"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"spacing": {
|
||||
"size_guide": {
|
||||
"tight": "1-2 (0.25rem-0.5rem)",
|
||||
"normal": "4-6 (1rem-1.5rem)",
|
||||
"loose": "8-12 (2rem-3rem)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"common_patterns": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pattern": "padding-4 margin-bottom-6",
|
||||
"use_case": "Card content spacing",
|
||||
"pixel_value": "1rem padding, 1.5rem margin"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Components** (12+ components, use pattern above):
|
||||
- **button**: 5 variants (primary, secondary, destructive, outline, ghost) + 3 sizes + states (default, hover, active, disabled, focus)
|
||||
@@ -385,26 +637,136 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
|
||||
|
||||
### layout-templates.json
|
||||
|
||||
**Template Reference**: `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/ui-design/systems/layout-templates.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Optimization**: Unified structure combining DOM and styling into single hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure Overview**:
|
||||
- **templates[]**: Array of layout templates
|
||||
- **target**: page/component name (hero-section, product-card)
|
||||
- **component_type**: universal | specialized
|
||||
- **device_type**: mobile | tablet | desktop | responsive
|
||||
- **layout_strategy**: grid-3col, flex-row, stack, sidebar, etc.
|
||||
- **structure**: Unified DOM + layout hierarchy
|
||||
- **tag**: HTML5 semantic tags
|
||||
- **attributes**: class, role, aria-*, data-state
|
||||
- **layout**: Layout properties only (display, grid, flex, position, spacing) using {token.path}
|
||||
- **responsive**: Breakpoint-specific overrides (ONLY changed properties)
|
||||
- **children**: Recursive structure
|
||||
- **content**: Text or {{placeholder}}
|
||||
- **accessibility**: patterns, keyboard_navigation, focus_management, screen_reader_notes
|
||||
- **usage_guide**: common_sizes, variant_recommendations, usage_context, accessibility_tips
|
||||
- **extraction_metadata**: source, created, code_snippets
|
||||
**Schema Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
|
||||
"templates": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"target": "string - page/component name (e.g., hero-section, product-card)",
|
||||
"description": "string - layout description",
|
||||
"component_type": "universal|specialized",
|
||||
"device_type": "mobile|tablet|desktop|responsive",
|
||||
"layout_strategy": "string - grid-3col|flex-row|stack|sidebar|etc",
|
||||
|
||||
"structure": {
|
||||
"tag": "string - HTML5 semantic tag (header|nav|main|section|article|aside|footer|div|etc)",
|
||||
"attributes": {
|
||||
"class": "string - semantic class name",
|
||||
"role": "string - ARIA role (navigation|main|complementary|etc)",
|
||||
"aria-label": "string - ARIA label",
|
||||
"aria-describedby": "string - ARIA describedby",
|
||||
"data-state": "string - data attributes for state management (open|closed|etc)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"layout": {
|
||||
"/* LAYOUT PROPERTIES ONLY - Use camelCase for property names */": "",
|
||||
"display": "grid|flex|block|inline-flex",
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "{spacing.*} or CSS value (repeat(3, 1fr))",
|
||||
"grid-template-rows": "string",
|
||||
"gap": "{spacing.*}",
|
||||
"padding": "{spacing.*}",
|
||||
"margin": "{spacing.*}",
|
||||
"alignItems": "start|center|end|stretch",
|
||||
"justifyContent": "start|center|end|space-between|space-around",
|
||||
"flexDirection": "row|column",
|
||||
"flexWrap": "wrap|nowrap",
|
||||
"position": "relative|absolute|fixed|sticky",
|
||||
"top|right|bottom|left": "string",
|
||||
"width": "string",
|
||||
"height": "string",
|
||||
"maxWidth": "string",
|
||||
"minHeight": "string"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"responsive": {
|
||||
"/* ONLY properties that CHANGE at each breakpoint - NO repetition */": "",
|
||||
"sm": {
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "1fr",
|
||||
"padding": "{spacing.4}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"md": {
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "repeat(2, 1fr)",
|
||||
"gap": "{spacing.6}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lg": {
|
||||
"grid-template-columns": "repeat(3, 1fr)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"children": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"/* Recursive structure - same fields as parent */": "",
|
||||
"tag": "string",
|
||||
"attributes": {},
|
||||
"layout": {},
|
||||
"responsive": {},
|
||||
"children": [],
|
||||
"content": "string or {{placeholder}}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"content": "string - text content or {{placeholder}} for dynamic content"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"accessibility": {
|
||||
"patterns": [
|
||||
"string - ARIA patterns used (e.g., WAI-ARIA Tabs pattern, Dialog pattern)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"keyboard_navigation": [
|
||||
"string - keyboard shortcuts (e.g., Tab/Shift+Tab navigation, Escape to close)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"focus_management": "string - focus trap strategy, initial focus target",
|
||||
"screen_reader_notes": [
|
||||
"string - screen reader announcements (e.g., Dialog opened, Tab selected)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"usage_guide": {
|
||||
"common_sizes": {
|
||||
"small": {
|
||||
"dimensions": "string - e.g., px-3 py-1.5 (height: ~32px)",
|
||||
"use_case": "string - Compact UI, mobile views"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"medium": {
|
||||
"dimensions": "string - e.g., px-4 py-2 (height: ~40px)",
|
||||
"use_case": "string - Default size for most contexts"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"large": {
|
||||
"dimensions": "string - e.g., px-6 py-3 (height: ~48px)",
|
||||
"use_case": "string - Prominent CTAs, hero sections"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"variant_recommendations": {
|
||||
"variant_name": {
|
||||
"description": "string - when to use this variant",
|
||||
"typical_actions": ["string - action examples"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"usage_context": [
|
||||
"string - typical usage scenarios (e.g., Landing page hero, Product listing grid)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"accessibility_tips": [
|
||||
"string - accessibility best practices (e.g., Ensure heading hierarchy, Add aria-label)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"extraction_metadata": {
|
||||
"source": "code-import|explore|text",
|
||||
"created": "ISO timestamp",
|
||||
"code_snippets": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"component_name": "string - which layout component",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_start": "number",
|
||||
"line_end": "number",
|
||||
"snippet": "string - complete HTML/CSS/JS code block",
|
||||
"context_type": "html-structure|css-utility|react-component|vue-component|etc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Field Rules**:
|
||||
- $schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification
|
||||
@@ -422,25 +784,149 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
|
||||
- usage_guide OPTIONAL for specialized components (can be simplified or omitted)
|
||||
- extraction_metadata.code_snippets ONLY present in Code Import mode
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure Optimization Benefits**:
|
||||
- Eliminates redundancy between dom_structure and css_layout_rules
|
||||
- Layout properties are co-located with corresponding DOM elements
|
||||
- Responsive overrides apply directly to the element they affect
|
||||
- Single source of truth for each element's structure and layout
|
||||
- Easier to maintain and understand hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
### animation-tokens.json
|
||||
|
||||
**Template Reference**: `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/ui-design/systems/animation-tokens.json`
|
||||
**Schema Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure Overview**:
|
||||
- **duration**: instant (0ms), fast (150ms), normal (300ms), slow (500ms), slower (1000ms)
|
||||
- **easing**: linear, ease-in, ease-out, ease-in-out, spring, bounce
|
||||
- **keyframes**: Animation definitions in pairs (in/out, open/close, enter/exit)
|
||||
- Required: fade-in/out, slide-up/down, scale-in/out, accordion-down/up, dialog-open/close, dropdown-open/close, toast-enter/exit, spin, pulse
|
||||
- **interactions**: Component interaction animations with property, duration, easing
|
||||
- button-hover/active, card-hover, input-focus, dropdown-toggle, accordion-toggle, dialog-toggle, tabs-switch
|
||||
- **transitions**: default, colors, transform, opacity, all-smooth
|
||||
- **component_animations**: Maps components to animations (MUST match design-tokens.json components)
|
||||
- State-based: dialog, dropdown, toast, accordion (use keyframes)
|
||||
- Interaction: button, card, input, tabs (use transitions)
|
||||
- **accessibility**: prefers_reduced_motion with CSS rule
|
||||
- **_metadata**: version, created, source, code_snippets
|
||||
"duration": {
|
||||
"$type": "duration",
|
||||
"instant": { "$value": "0ms" },
|
||||
"fast": { "$value": "150ms" },
|
||||
"normal": { "$value": "300ms" },
|
||||
"slow": { "$value": "500ms" },
|
||||
"slower": { "$value": "1000ms" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"easing": {
|
||||
"$type": "cubicBezier",
|
||||
"linear": { "$value": "linear" },
|
||||
"ease-in": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 1, 1)" },
|
||||
"ease-out": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0, 0, 0.2, 1)" },
|
||||
"ease-in-out": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1)" },
|
||||
"spring": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.55, 0.265, 1.55)" },
|
||||
"bounce": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.6, 0.32, 1.6)" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"keyframes": {
|
||||
"/* PATTERN: Define pairs (in/out, open/close, enter/exit) */": {
|
||||
"0%": { "/* CSS properties */": "value" },
|
||||
"100%": { "/* CSS properties */": "value" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"/* Required keyframes for components: */": "",
|
||||
"fade-in": { "0%": { "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"fade-out": { "/* reverse of fade-in */" },
|
||||
"slide-up": { "0%": { "transform": "translateY(10px)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"slide-down": { "/* reverse direction */" },
|
||||
"scale-in": { "0%": { "transform": "scale(0.95)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "scale(1)", "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"scale-out": { "/* reverse of scale-in */" },
|
||||
"accordion-down": { "0%": { "height": "0", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "height": "var(--radix-accordion-content-height)", "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"accordion-up": { "/* reverse */" },
|
||||
"dialog-open": { "0%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -48%) scale(0.96)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -50%) scale(1)", "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"dialog-close": { "/* reverse */" },
|
||||
"dropdown-open": { "0%": { "transform": "scale(0.95) translateY(-4px)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "scale(1) translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"dropdown-close": { "/* reverse */" },
|
||||
"toast-enter": { "0%": { "transform": "translateX(100%)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "translateX(0)", "opacity": "1" } },
|
||||
"toast-exit": { "/* reverse */" },
|
||||
"spin": { "0%": { "transform": "rotate(0deg)" }, "100%": { "transform": "rotate(360deg)" } },
|
||||
"pulse": { "0%, 100%": { "opacity": "1" }, "50%": { "opacity": "0.5" } }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"interactions": {
|
||||
"/* PATTERN: Define for each interactive component state */": {
|
||||
"property": "string - CSS properties (comma-separated)",
|
||||
"duration": "{duration.*}",
|
||||
"easing": "{easing.*}"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"button-hover": { "property": "background-color, transform", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"button-active": { "property": "transform", "duration": "{duration.instant}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in}" },
|
||||
"card-hover": { "property": "box-shadow, transform", "duration": "{duration.normal}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}" },
|
||||
"input-focus": { "property": "border-color, box-shadow", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"dropdown-toggle": { "property": "opacity, transform", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"accordion-toggle": { "property": "height, opacity", "duration": "{duration.normal}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}" },
|
||||
"dialog-toggle": { "property": "opacity, transform", "duration": "{duration.normal}", "easing": "{easing.spring}" },
|
||||
"tabs-switch": { "property": "color, border-color", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"transitions": {
|
||||
"default": { "$value": "all {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in-out}" },
|
||||
"colors": { "$value": "color {duration.fast} {easing.linear}, background-color {duration.fast} {easing.linear}" },
|
||||
"transform": { "$value": "transform {duration.normal} {easing.spring}" },
|
||||
"opacity": { "$value": "opacity {duration.fast} {easing.linear}" },
|
||||
"all-smooth": { "$value": "all {duration.slow} {easing.ease-in-out}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"component_animations": {
|
||||
"/* PATTERN: Map each component to its animations - MUST match design-tokens.json component list */": {
|
||||
"stateOrInteraction": {
|
||||
"animation": "keyframe-name {duration.*} {easing.*} OR none",
|
||||
"transition": "{interactions.*} OR none"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"button": {
|
||||
"hover": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.button-hover}" },
|
||||
"active": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.button-active}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"card": {
|
||||
"hover": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.card-hover}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"input": {
|
||||
"focus": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.input-focus}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dialog": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "dialog-open {duration.normal} {easing.spring}" },
|
||||
"close": { "animation": "dialog-close {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dropdown": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "dropdown-open {duration.fast} {easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"close": { "animation": "dropdown-close {duration.fast} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"toast": {
|
||||
"enter": { "animation": "toast-enter {duration.normal} {easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"exit": { "animation": "toast-exit {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"accordion": {
|
||||
"open": { "animation": "accordion-down {duration.normal} {easing.ease-out}" },
|
||||
"close": { "animation": "accordion-up {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"/* Add mappings for: tabs, switch, checkbox, badge, alert */" : {}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"accessibility": {
|
||||
"prefers_reduced_motion": {
|
||||
"duration": "0ms",
|
||||
"keyframes": {},
|
||||
"note": "Disable animations when user prefers reduced motion",
|
||||
"css_rule": "@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { *, *::before, *::after { animation-duration: 0.01ms !important; animation-iteration-count: 1 !important; transition-duration: 0.01ms !important; } }"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"_metadata": {
|
||||
"version": "string",
|
||||
"created": "ISO timestamp",
|
||||
"source": "code-import|explore|text",
|
||||
"code_snippets": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"animation_name": "string - keyframe/transition name",
|
||||
"source_file": "string - absolute path",
|
||||
"line_start": "number",
|
||||
"line_end": "number",
|
||||
"snippet": "string - complete @keyframes or transition code",
|
||||
"context_type": "css-keyframes|css-transition|js-animation|scss-animation|etc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Field Rules**:
|
||||
- $schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -120,11 +120,7 @@ Before completing any task, verify:
|
||||
- Make assumptions - verify with existing materials
|
||||
- Skip quality verification steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Bash Tool**:
|
||||
- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS:**
|
||||
- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
|
||||
- Verify resource/dependency existence before referencing
|
||||
- Execute tasks systematically and incrementally
|
||||
- Test and validate work thoroughly
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"defaultTool": "gemini",
|
||||
"promptFormat": "plain",
|
||||
"smartContext": {
|
||||
"enabled": false,
|
||||
"maxFiles": 10
|
||||
},
|
||||
"nativeResume": true,
|
||||
"recursiveQuery": true,
|
||||
"cache": {
|
||||
"injectionMode": "auto",
|
||||
"defaultPrefix": "",
|
||||
"defaultSuffix": ""
|
||||
},
|
||||
"codeIndexMcp": "ace",
|
||||
"$schema": "./cli-settings.schema.json"
|
||||
}
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,364 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: ccw-debug
|
||||
description: Debug coordinator - analyze issue, select debug strategy, execute debug workflow in main process
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--mode cli|debug|test|bidirectional] [--yes|-y] \"bug description\""
|
||||
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CCW-Debug Command - Debug Coordinator
|
||||
|
||||
Debug orchestrator: issue analysis → strategy selection → debug execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Concept: Debug Units (调试单元)
|
||||
|
||||
**Definition**: Debug commands grouped into logical units for different root cause strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Debug Units**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Type | Pattern | Example |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| **Quick Diagnosis** | CLI analysis only | cli → recommendation |
|
||||
| **Hypothesis-Driven** | Debug exploration | debug-with-file → apply fix |
|
||||
| **Test-Driven** | Test generation/iteration | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute |
|
||||
| **Convergence** | Parallel debug + test | debug + test (parallel) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Atomic Rules**:
|
||||
1. CLI mode: Analysis only, recommendation for user action
|
||||
2. Debug/Test modes: Full cycle (analysis → fix → validate)
|
||||
3. Bidirectional mode: Parallel execution, merge findings
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Model
|
||||
|
||||
**Synchronous (Main Process)**: Debug commands execute via Skill, blocking until complete.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input → Analyze Issue → Select Strategy → [Confirm] → Execute Debug
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Skill (blocking)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update TodoWrite
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Generate Fix/Report
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Analyze Issue
|
||||
|
||||
**Input** → Extract (description, symptoms) → Assess (error_type, clarity, complexity, scope) → **Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Values |
|
||||
|-------|--------|
|
||||
| error_type | syntax \| logic \| async \| integration \| unknown |
|
||||
| clarity | 0-3 (≥2 = clear) |
|
||||
| complexity | low \| medium \| high |
|
||||
| scope | single-module \| cross-module \| system |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Mode Detection (Priority Order)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Input Keywords → Mode
|
||||
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
quick|fast|immediate|recommendation|suggest → cli
|
||||
test|fail|coverage|pass → test
|
||||
multiple|system|distributed|concurrent → bidirectional
|
||||
(default) → debug
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `IssueType: [type] | Clarity: [clarity]/3 | Complexity: [complexity] | RecommendedMode: [mode]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1.5: Issue Clarification (if clarity < 2)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis → Check clarity ≥ 2?
|
||||
↓
|
||||
YES → Continue to Phase 2
|
||||
↓
|
||||
NO → Ask Questions → Update Analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions Asked**: Error Symptoms, When It Occurs, Affected Components, Reproducibility
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Select Debug Strategy & Build Command Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis → Detect Mode (keywords) → Build Command Chain → Debug Workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Command Chain Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Command Chain | Execution |
|
||||
|------|---------------|-----------|
|
||||
| **cli** | ccw cli --mode analysis --rule analysis-diagnose-bug-root-cause | Analysis only |
|
||||
| **debug** | debug-with-file → test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute | Sequential |
|
||||
| **test** | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute | Sequential |
|
||||
| **bidirectional** | (debug-with-file ∥ test-fix-gen ∥ test-cycle-execute) → merge-findings | Parallel → Merge |
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: `∥` = parallel execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `Mode: [mode] | Strategy: [strategy] | Commands: [1. /cmd1 2. /cmd2]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Debug Chain → Show Strategy → Ask User → User Decision:
|
||||
- ✓ Confirm → Continue to Phase 4
|
||||
- ⚙ Change Mode → Select Different Mode (back to Phase 2)
|
||||
- ✗ Cancel → Abort
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Debug Chain → Create Session Dir → Initialize Tracking → Tracking State
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Structure**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Session ID: CCWD-{issue-slug}-{date}
|
||||
Session Dir: .workflow/.ccw-debug/{session_id}/
|
||||
|
||||
TodoWrite:
|
||||
CCWD:{mode}: [1/n] /command1 [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWD:{mode}: [2/n] /command2 [pending]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
status.json:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "CCWD-...",
|
||||
"mode": "debug|cli|test|bidirectional",
|
||||
"status": "running",
|
||||
"parallel_execution": false|true,
|
||||
"issue": { description, error_type, clarity, complexity },
|
||||
"command_chain": [...],
|
||||
"findings": { debug, test, merged }
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- TODO: `-> CCWD:debug: [1/3] /workflow:debug-with-file | ...`
|
||||
- Status File: `.workflow/.ccw-debug/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Execute Debug Chain
|
||||
|
||||
#### For Bidirectional Mode (Parallel Execution)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Start Commands (parallel) → Execute debug-with-file ∥ test-fix-gen ∥ test-cycle-execute
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Collect Results → Merge Findings
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update status.json (findings.merged)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Mark completed
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### For Sequential Modes (cli, debug, test)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Start Command → Update status (running) → Execute via Skill → Result
|
||||
↓
|
||||
CLI Mode? → YES → Ask Escalation → Escalate or Done
|
||||
→ NO → Continue
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update status (completed) → Next Command
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Error? → YES → Ask Action (Retry/Skip/Abort)
|
||||
→ NO → Continue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Error Handling Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Command Error → Update status (failed) → Ask User:
|
||||
- Retry → Re-execute (same index)
|
||||
- Skip → Continue next command
|
||||
- Abort → Stop execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### CLI Mode Escalation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
CLI Result → Findings.confidence?
|
||||
↓
|
||||
High → Present findings → User decides:
|
||||
• Done (end here)
|
||||
• Escalate to debug mode
|
||||
• Escalate to test mode
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Low → Recommend escalation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 1: Analyze Issue
|
||||
|-- Extract: description, error_type, clarity, complexity, scope
|
||||
+-- If clarity < 2 -> Phase 1.5: Clarify Issue
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 2: Select Debug Strategy & Build Chain
|
||||
|-- Detect mode: cli | debug | test | bidirectional
|
||||
|-- Build command chain based on mode
|
||||
|-- Parallel execution for bidirectional
|
||||
+-- Consider escalation points (cli → debug/test)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 3: User Confirmation (optional)
|
||||
|-- Show debug strategy
|
||||
+-- Allow mode change
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|-- Create todos with CCWD prefix
|
||||
+-- Initialize .workflow/.ccw-debug/{session_id}/status.json
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 5: Execute Debug Chain
|
||||
|-- For sequential modes: execute commands in order
|
||||
|-- For bidirectional: execute debug + test in parallel
|
||||
|-- CLI mode: present findings, ask for escalation
|
||||
|-- Merge findings (bidirectional mode)
|
||||
+-- Update status and TODO
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Debug Pipeline Examples
|
||||
|
||||
| Issue | Mode | Pipeline |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|
|
||||
| "Login timeout error (quick)" | cli | ccw cli → analysis → (escalate or done) |
|
||||
| "User login fails intermittently" | debug | debug-with-file → test-gen → test-cycle |
|
||||
| "Authentication tests failing" | test | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute |
|
||||
| "Multi-module auth + db sync issue" | bidirectional | (debug ∥ test) → merge findings |
|
||||
|
||||
**Legend**: `∥` = parallel execution
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
### Dual Tracking System
|
||||
|
||||
**1. TodoWrite-Based Tracking** (UI Display):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
// Initial state (debug mode)
|
||||
CCWD:debug: [1/3] /workflow:debug-with-file [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWD:debug: [2/3] /workflow:test-fix-gen [pending]
|
||||
CCWD:debug: [3/3] /workflow:test-cycle-execute [pending]
|
||||
|
||||
// CLI mode: only 1 command
|
||||
CCWD:cli: [1/1] ccw cli --mode analysis [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Bidirectional mode
|
||||
CCWD:bidirectional: [1/3] /workflow:debug-with-file [in_progress] ∥
|
||||
CCWD:bidirectional: [2/3] /workflow:test-fix-gen [in_progress] ∥
|
||||
CCWD:bidirectional: [3/3] /workflow:test-cycle-execute [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWD:bidirectional: [4/4] merge-findings [pending]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Status.json Tracking**: Persistent state for debug monitoring.
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `.workflow/.ccw-debug/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "CCWD-auth-timeout-2025-02-02",
|
||||
"mode": "debug",
|
||||
"status": "running|completed|failed",
|
||||
"parallel_execution": false,
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-02-02T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2025-02-02T10:05:00Z",
|
||||
"issue": {
|
||||
"description": "User login timeout after 30 seconds",
|
||||
"error_type": "async",
|
||||
"clarity": 3,
|
||||
"complexity": "medium"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"command_chain": [
|
||||
{ "index": 0, "command": "/workflow:debug-with-file", "unit": "sequential", "status": "completed" },
|
||||
{ "index": 1, "command": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "sequential", "status": "in_progress" },
|
||||
{ "index": 2, "command": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "sequential", "status": "pending" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"current_index": 1,
|
||||
"findings": {
|
||||
"debug": { "root_cause": "...", "confidence": "high" },
|
||||
"test": { "failure_pattern": "..." },
|
||||
"merged": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Status Values**:
|
||||
- `running`: Debug workflow in progress
|
||||
- `completed`: Debug finished, fix applied
|
||||
- `failed`: Debug aborted or unfixable
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode-Specific Fields**:
|
||||
- `cli` mode: No findings field (recommendation-only)
|
||||
- `debug`/`test`: Single finding source
|
||||
- `bidirectional`: All three findings + merged result
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Issue-Focused** - Diagnose root cause, not symptoms
|
||||
2. **Mode-Driven** - 4 debug strategies for different issues
|
||||
3. **Parallel Capability** - Bidirectional mode for complex systems
|
||||
4. **Escalation Support** - CLI → debug/test mode progression
|
||||
5. **Quick Diagnosis** - CLI mode for immediate recommendations
|
||||
6. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCWD prefix to isolate debug todos
|
||||
7. **Finding Convergence** - Merge parallel results for consensus
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Auto-select mode
|
||||
/ccw-debug "Login failed: token validation error"
|
||||
|
||||
# Explicit mode selection
|
||||
/ccw-debug --mode cli "Quick diagnosis: API 500 error"
|
||||
/ccw-debug --mode debug "User profile sync intermittent failure"
|
||||
/ccw-debug --mode test "Permission check failing"
|
||||
/ccw-debug --mode bidirectional "Multi-module auth + cache sync issue"
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto mode (skip confirmations)
|
||||
/ccw-debug --yes "Production hotfix: database connection timeout"
|
||||
|
||||
# Resume or escalate from previous session
|
||||
/ccw-debug --mode debug --source-session CCWD-login-timeout-2025-01-27
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mode Selection Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User calls: /ccw-debug "issue description"
|
||||
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "quick", "fast", "recommendation"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: CLI (2-5 min analysis, optional escalation)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "test", "fail", "coverage"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Test (automated iteration, ≥95% pass)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "multiple", "system", "distributed"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Bidirectional (parallel debug + test)
|
||||
│
|
||||
└─ Default → Debug (full hypothesis-driven workflow)
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,456 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: ccw-plan
|
||||
description: Planning coordinator - analyze requirements, select planning strategy, execute planning workflow in main process
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--mode lite|multi-cli|full|plan-verify|replan|cli|issue|rapid-to-issue|brainstorm-with-file|analyze-with-file] [--yes|-y] \"task description\""
|
||||
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(*), Glob(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CCW-Plan Command - Planning Coordinator
|
||||
|
||||
Planning orchestrator: requirement analysis → strategy selection → planning execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Concept: Planning Units (规划单元)
|
||||
|
||||
**Definition**: Planning commands are grouped into logical units based on verification requirements and collaboration strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
**Planning Units**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Type | Pattern | Example |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| **Quick Planning** | plan-cmd (no verify) | lite-plan |
|
||||
| **Verified Planning** | plan-cmd → verify-cmd | plan → plan-verify |
|
||||
| **Collaborative Planning** | multi-cli-plan (implicit verify) | multi-cli-plan |
|
||||
| **With-File Planning** | brainstorm-with-file or analyze-with-file | brainstorm + plan options |
|
||||
| **CLI-Assisted Planning** | ccw cli (analysis) → recommendations | quick analysis + decision |
|
||||
| **Issue Workflow Planning** | plan → issue workflow (discover/queue/execute) | rapid-to-issue bridge |
|
||||
|
||||
**Atomic Rules**:
|
||||
1. Lite mode: No verification (fast iteration)
|
||||
2. Plan-verify mode: Mandatory quality gate
|
||||
3. Multi-cli/Full mode: Optional verification (via --skip-verify flag)
|
||||
4. With-File modes: Self-contained iteration with built-in post-completion options
|
||||
5. CLI mode: Quick analysis, user-driven decisions
|
||||
6. Issue modes: Planning integrated into issue workflow lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Model
|
||||
|
||||
**Synchronous (Main Process)**: Planning commands execute via Skill, blocking until complete.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input → Analyze Requirements → Select Strategy → [Confirm] → Execute Planning
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Skill (blocking)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update TodoWrite
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Generate Artifacts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Analyze Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Input** → Extract (goal, scope, constraints) → Assess (complexity, clarity, criticality) → **Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Values |
|
||||
|-------|--------|
|
||||
| complexity | low \| medium \| high |
|
||||
| clarity | 0-3 (≥2 = clear) |
|
||||
| criticality | normal \| high \| critical |
|
||||
| scope | single-module \| cross-module \| system \| batch-issues |
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `Type: [task_type] | Goal: [goal] | Complexity: [complexity] | Clarity: [clarity]/3 | Criticality: [criticality]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1.5: Requirement Clarification (if clarity < 2)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis → Check clarity ≥ 2?
|
||||
↓
|
||||
YES → Continue to Phase 2
|
||||
↓
|
||||
NO → Ask Questions → Update Analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions Asked**: Goal (Create/Fix/Optimize/Analyze), Scope (Single file/Module/Cross-module/System), Constraints (Backward compat/Skip tests/Urgent hotfix)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Select Planning Strategy & Build Command Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis → Detect Mode (keywords) → Build Command Chain → Planning Workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Mode Detection (Priority Order)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Input Keywords → Mode
|
||||
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
quick|fast|immediate|recommendation|suggest → cli
|
||||
issues?|batch|issue workflow|structured workflow|queue → issue
|
||||
issue transition|rapid.*issue|plan.*issue|convert.*issue → rapid-to-issue
|
||||
brainstorm|ideation|头脑风暴|创意|发散思维|multi-perspective → brainstorm-with-file
|
||||
analyze.*document|explore.*concept|collaborative analysis → analyze-with-file
|
||||
production|critical|payment|auth → plan-verify
|
||||
adjust|modify|change plan → replan
|
||||
uncertain|explore → full
|
||||
complex|multiple module|integrate → multi-cli
|
||||
(default) → lite
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Command Chain Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Command Chain | Verification | Use Case |
|
||||
|------|---------------|--------------|----------|
|
||||
| **cli** | ccw cli --mode analysis --rule planning-* | None | Quick planning recommendation |
|
||||
| **issue** | /issue:discover → /issue:plan → /issue:queue → /issue:execute | Optional | Batch issue planning & execution |
|
||||
| **rapid-to-issue** | lite-plan → /issue:convert-to-plan → queue → execute | Optional | Quick planning → Issue workflow bridge |
|
||||
| **brainstorm-with-file** | /workflow:brainstorm-with-file → (plan/issue options) | Self-contained | Multi-perspective ideation |
|
||||
| **analyze-with-file** | /workflow:analyze-with-file → (plan/issue options) | Self-contained | Collaborative architecture analysis |
|
||||
| **lite** | lite-plan | None | Fast simple planning |
|
||||
| **multi-cli** | multi-cli-plan → [plan-verify] | Optional | Multi-model collaborative planning |
|
||||
| **full** | brainstorm → plan → [plan-verify] | Optional | Comprehensive brainstorm + planning |
|
||||
| **plan-verify** | plan → **plan-verify** | **Mandatory** | Production/critical features |
|
||||
| **replan** | replan | None | Plan refinement/adjustment |
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**:
|
||||
- `[ ]` = optional verification
|
||||
- **bold** = mandatory quality gate
|
||||
- With-File modes include built-in post-completion options to create plans/issues
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `Mode: [mode] | Strategy: [strategy] | Commands: [1. /cmd1 2. /cmd2]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Planning Chain → Show Strategy → Ask User → User Decision:
|
||||
- ✓ Confirm → Continue to Phase 4
|
||||
- ⚙ Adjust → Change Mode (back to Phase 2)
|
||||
- ✗ Cancel → Abort
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Planning Chain → Create Session Dir → Initialize Tracking → Tracking State
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Structure**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Session ID: CCWP-{goal-slug}-{date}
|
||||
Session Dir: .workflow/.ccw-plan/{session_id}/
|
||||
|
||||
TodoWrite:
|
||||
CCWP:{mode}: [1/n] /command1 [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWP:{mode}: [2/n] /command2 [pending]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
status.json:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "CCWP-...",
|
||||
"mode": "plan-verify",
|
||||
"status": "running",
|
||||
"command_chain": [...],
|
||||
"quality_gate": "pending" // plan-verify mode only
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- TODO: `-> CCWP:plan-verify: [1/2] /workflow:plan | ...`
|
||||
- Status File: `.workflow/.ccw-plan/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Execute Planning Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Start Command → Update status (running) → Execute via Skill → Result
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### For Plan-Verify Mode (Quality Gate)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Quality Gate → PASS → Mark completed → Next command
|
||||
↓ FAIL (plan-verify mode)
|
||||
Ask User → Refine: replan + re-verify
|
||||
→ Override: continue anyway
|
||||
→ Abort: stop planning
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Error Handling Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Command Error → Update status (failed) → Ask User:
|
||||
- Retry → Re-execute (same index)
|
||||
- Skip → Continue next command
|
||||
- Abort → Stop execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Planning Pipeline Examples
|
||||
|
||||
| Input | Mode | Pipeline | Use Case |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|----------|
|
||||
| "Quick: should we use OAuth2?" | cli | ccw cli --mode analysis → recommendation | Immediate planning advice |
|
||||
| "Plan user login system" | lite | lite-plan | Fast simple planning |
|
||||
| "Implement OAuth2 auth" | multi-cli | multi-cli-plan → [plan-verify] | Multi-model collaborative planning |
|
||||
| "Design notification system" | full | brainstorm → plan → [plan-verify] | Comprehensive brainstorm + planning |
|
||||
| "Payment processing (prod)" | plan-verify | plan → **plan-verify** | Production critical (mandatory gate) |
|
||||
| "头脑风暴: 用户通知系统重新设计" | brainstorm-with-file | brainstorm-with-file → (plan/issue options) | Multi-perspective ideation |
|
||||
| "协作分析: 认证架构设计决策" | analyze-with-file | analyze-with-file → (plan/issue options) | Collaborative analysis |
|
||||
| "Batch plan: handle 10 pending issues" | issue | /issue:discover → plan → queue → execute | Batch issue planning |
|
||||
| "Plan and create issues" | rapid-to-issue | lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute | Quick plan → Issue workflow |
|
||||
| "Update existing plan" | replan | replan | Plan refinement/adjustment |
|
||||
|
||||
**Legend**:
|
||||
- `[ ]` = optional verification
|
||||
- **bold** = mandatory quality gate
|
||||
- **With-File modes** include built-in post-completion options to create plans/issues
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
### Dual Tracking System
|
||||
|
||||
**1. TodoWrite-Based Tracking** (UI Display):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
// Plan-verify mode (mandatory quality gate)
|
||||
CCWP:plan-verify: [1/2] /workflow:plan [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWP:plan-verify: [2/2] /workflow:plan-verify [pending]
|
||||
|
||||
// CLI mode (quick recommendations)
|
||||
CCWP:cli: [1/1] ccw cli --mode analysis [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Issue mode (batch planning)
|
||||
CCWP:issue: [1/4] /issue:discover [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWP:issue: [2/4] /issue:plan [pending]
|
||||
CCWP:issue: [3/4] /issue:queue [pending]
|
||||
CCWP:issue: [4/4] /issue:execute [pending]
|
||||
|
||||
// Rapid-to-issue mode (planning → issue bridge)
|
||||
CCWP:rapid-to-issue: [1/4] /workflow:lite-plan [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWP:rapid-to-issue: [2/4] /issue:convert-to-plan [pending]
|
||||
CCWP:rapid-to-issue: [3/4] /issue:queue [pending]
|
||||
CCWP:rapid-to-issue: [4/4] /issue:execute [pending]
|
||||
|
||||
// Brainstorm-with-file mode (self-contained)
|
||||
CCWP:brainstorm-with-file: [1/1] /workflow:brainstorm-with-file [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Analyze-with-file mode (self-contained)
|
||||
CCWP:analyze-with-file: [1/1] /workflow:analyze-with-file [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Lite mode (fast simple planning)
|
||||
CCWP:lite: [1/1] /workflow:lite-plan [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Multi-CLI mode (collaborative planning)
|
||||
CCWP:multi-cli: [1/1] /workflow:multi-cli-plan [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Full mode (brainstorm + planning with optional verification)
|
||||
CCWP:full: [1/2] /workflow:brainstorm [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWP:full: [2/2] /workflow:plan [pending]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Status.json Tracking**: Persistent state for planning monitoring.
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `.workflow/.ccw-plan/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "CCWP-oauth-auth-2025-02-02",
|
||||
"mode": "plan-verify",
|
||||
"status": "running|completed|failed",
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-02-02T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2025-02-02T10:05:00Z",
|
||||
"analysis": {
|
||||
"goal": "Implement OAuth2 authentication",
|
||||
"complexity": "high",
|
||||
"clarity_score": 2,
|
||||
"criticality": "high"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"command_chain": [
|
||||
{ "index": 0, "command": "/workflow:plan", "mandatory": false, "status": "completed" },
|
||||
{ "index": 1, "command": "/workflow:plan-verify", "mandatory": true, "status": "running" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"current_index": 1,
|
||||
"quality_gate": "pending|PASS|FAIL"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Status Values**:
|
||||
- `running`: Planning in progress
|
||||
- `completed`: Planning finished successfully
|
||||
- `failed`: Planning aborted or quality gate failed
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Gate Values** (plan-verify mode only):
|
||||
- `pending`: Verification not started
|
||||
- `PASS`: Plan meets quality standards
|
||||
- `FAIL`: Plan needs refinement
|
||||
|
||||
**Mode-Specific Fields**:
|
||||
- **plan-verify**: `quality_gate` field (pending|PASS|FAIL)
|
||||
- **cli**: No command_chain, stores CLI recommendations and user decision
|
||||
- **issue**: includes issue discovery results and queue configuration
|
||||
- **rapid-to-issue**: includes plan output and conversion to issue
|
||||
- **with-file modes**: stores session artifacts and post-completion options
|
||||
- **other modes**: basic command_chain tracking
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Extended Planning Modes
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI-Assisted Planning (cli mode)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Quick Input → ccw cli --mode analysis --rule planning-* → Recommendations → User Decision:
|
||||
- ✓ Accept → Create lite-plan from recommendations
|
||||
- ↗ Escalate → Switch to multi-cli or full mode
|
||||
- ✗ Done → Stop (recommendation only)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Use Cases**:
|
||||
- Quick architecture decision questions
|
||||
- Planning approach recommendations
|
||||
- Pattern/library selection advice
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI Rules** (auto-selected based on context):
|
||||
- `planning-plan-architecture-design` - Architecture decisions
|
||||
- `planning-breakdown-task-steps` - Task decomposition
|
||||
- `planning-design-component-spec` - Component specifications
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### With-File Planning Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
**With-File workflows** provide documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration, generating comprehensive session artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Purpose | Key Features | Output Folder |
|
||||
|------|---------|--------------|---------------|
|
||||
| **brainstorm-with-file** | Multi-perspective ideation | Gemini/Codex/Claude perspectives, diverge-converge | `.workflow/.brainstorm/` |
|
||||
| **analyze-with-file** | Collaborative architecture analysis | Multi-round Q&A, CLI exploration, documented discussions | `.workflow/.analysis/` |
|
||||
|
||||
**Detection Keywords**:
|
||||
- **brainstorm-with-file**: 头脑风暴, 创意, 发散思维, multi-perspective, ideation
|
||||
- **analyze-with-file**: 协作分析, 深度理解, collaborative analysis, explore concept
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics**:
|
||||
1. **Self-Contained**: Each workflow handles its own iteration loop
|
||||
2. **Documented Process**: Creates evolving documents (brainstorm.md, discussion.md)
|
||||
3. **Multi-CLI**: Uses Gemini/Codex/Claude for different perspectives
|
||||
4. **Built-in Post-Completion**: Offers follow-up options (create plan, create issue, deep dive)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue Workflow Integration
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Purpose | Command Chain | Typical Use |
|
||||
|------|---------|---------------|-------------|
|
||||
| **issue** | Batch issue planning | discover → plan → queue → execute | Multiple issues in codebase |
|
||||
| **rapid-to-issue** | Quick plan → Issue workflow | lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute | Fast iteration → structured execution |
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue Workflow Bridge**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
lite-plan (in-memory) → /issue:convert-to-plan → Creates issue JSON
|
||||
↓
|
||||
/issue:queue → Form execution queue
|
||||
↓
|
||||
/issue:execute → DAG-based parallel execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**When to use Issue Workflow**:
|
||||
- Need structured multi-stage execution (queue-based)
|
||||
- Want parallel DAG execution
|
||||
- Multiple related changes as individual commits
|
||||
- Converting brainstorm/plan output to executable tasks
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Planning-Focused** - Pure planning coordination, no execution
|
||||
2. **Mode-Driven** - 10 planning modes for different needs (lite/multi-cli/full/plan-verify/replan + cli/issue/rapid-to-issue/brainstorm-with-file/analyze-with-file)
|
||||
3. **CLI Integration** - Quick analysis for immediate recommendations
|
||||
4. **With-File Support** - Multi-CLI collaboration with documented artifacts
|
||||
5. **Issue Workflow Bridge** - Seamless transition from planning to structured execution
|
||||
6. **Quality Gates** - Mandatory verification for production features
|
||||
7. **Flexible Verification** - Optional for exploration, mandatory for critical features
|
||||
8. **Progressive Clarification** - Low clarity triggers requirement questions
|
||||
9. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCWP prefix to isolate planning todos
|
||||
10. **Handoff Ready** - Generates artifacts ready for execution phase
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Auto-select mode (keyword-based detection)
|
||||
/ccw-plan "Add user authentication"
|
||||
|
||||
# Standard planning modes
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode lite "Add logout endpoint"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode multi-cli "Implement OAuth2"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode full "Design notification system"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode plan-verify "Payment processing (production)"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode replan --session WFS-auth-2025-01-28
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI-assisted planning (quick recommendations)
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode cli "Quick: should we use OAuth2 or JWT?"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode cli "Which state management pattern for React app?"
|
||||
|
||||
# With-File workflows (multi-CLI collaboration)
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode brainstorm-with-file "头脑风暴: 用户通知系统重新设计"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode analyze-with-file "协作分析: 认证架构的设计决策"
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue workflow integration
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode issue "Batch plan: handle all pending security issues"
|
||||
/ccw-plan --mode rapid-to-issue "Plan user profile feature and create issue"
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto mode (skip confirmations)
|
||||
/ccw-plan --yes "Quick feature: user profile endpoint"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mode Selection Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User calls: /ccw-plan "task description"
|
||||
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "quick", "fast", "recommendation"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: CLI (quick analysis → recommendations)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "issue", "batch", "queue"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Issue (batch planning → execution queue)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "plan.*issue", "rapid.*issue"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Rapid-to-Issue (lite-plan → issue bridge)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "头脑风暴", "brainstorm", "ideation"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Brainstorm-with-file (multi-CLI ideation)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "协作分析", "analyze.*document"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Analyze-with-file (collaborative analysis)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "production", "critical", "payment"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Plan-Verify (mandatory quality gate)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "adjust", "modify", "change plan"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Replan (refine existing plan)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "uncertain", "explore"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Full (brainstorm → plan → [verify])
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "complex", "multiple module"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Multi-CLI (collaborative planning)
|
||||
│
|
||||
└─ Default → Lite (fast simple planning)
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,387 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: ccw-test
|
||||
description: Test coordinator - analyze testing needs, select test strategy, execute test workflow in main process
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--mode gen|fix|verify|tdd] [--yes|-y] \"test description\""
|
||||
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CCW-Test Command - Test Coordinator
|
||||
|
||||
Test orchestrator: testing needs analysis → strategy selection → test execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Concept: Test Units (测试单元)
|
||||
|
||||
**Definition**: Test commands grouped into logical units based on testing objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Units**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Type | Pattern | Example |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| **Generation Only** | test-gen (no execution) | test-fix-gen |
|
||||
| **Test + Fix Cycle** | test-gen → test-execute-fix | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute |
|
||||
| **Verification Only** | existing-tests → execute | execute-tests |
|
||||
| **TDD Cycle** | tdd-plan → tdd-execute → verify | Red-Green-Refactor |
|
||||
|
||||
**Atomic Rules**:
|
||||
1. Gen mode: Generate tests only (no execution)
|
||||
2. Fix mode: Generate + auto-iteration until ≥95% pass
|
||||
3. Verify mode: Execute existing tests + report
|
||||
4. TDD mode: Full Red-Green-Refactor cycle compliance
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Model
|
||||
|
||||
**Synchronous (Main Process)**: Test commands execute via Skill, blocking until complete.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input → Analyze Testing Needs → Select Strategy → [Confirm] → Execute Tests
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Skill (blocking)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update TodoWrite
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Generate Tests/Results
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Analyze Testing Needs
|
||||
|
||||
**Input** → Extract (description, target_module, existing_tests) → Assess (testing_goal, framework, coverage_target) → **Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Values |
|
||||
|-------|--------|
|
||||
| testing_goal | generate \| fix \| verify \| tdd |
|
||||
| framework | jest \| vitest \| pytest \| ... |
|
||||
| coverage_target | 0-100 (default: 80) |
|
||||
| existing_tests | true \| false |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Mode Detection (Priority Order)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Input Keywords → Mode
|
||||
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
generate|create|write test|need test → gen
|
||||
fix|repair|failing|broken → fix
|
||||
verify|validate|check|run test → verify
|
||||
tdd|test-driven|test first → tdd
|
||||
(default) → fix
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `TestingGoal: [goal] | Mode: [mode] | Target: [module] | Framework: [framework]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1.5: Testing Clarification (if needed)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis → Check testing_goal known?
|
||||
↓
|
||||
YES → Check target_module set?
|
||||
↓
|
||||
YES → Continue to Phase 2
|
||||
↓
|
||||
NO → Ask Questions → Update Analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions Asked**: Testing Goal, Target Module/Files, Coverage Requirements, Test Framework
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Select Test Strategy & Build Command Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis → Detect Mode (keywords) → Build Command Chain → Test Workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Command Chain Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Command Chain | Behavior |
|
||||
|------|---------------|----------|
|
||||
| **gen** | test-fix-gen | Generate only, no execution |
|
||||
| **fix** | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute (iterate) | Auto-iteration until ≥95% pass or max iterations |
|
||||
| **verify** | execute-existing-tests → coverage-report | Execute + report only |
|
||||
| **tdd** | tdd-plan → execute → tdd-verify | Red-Green-Refactor cycle compliance |
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: `(iterate)` = auto-iteration until pass_rate ≥ 95% or max_iterations reached
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `Mode: [mode] | Strategy: [strategy] | Commands: [1. /cmd1 2. /cmd2]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Test Chain → Show Strategy → Ask User → User Decision:
|
||||
- ✓ Confirm → Continue to Phase 4
|
||||
- ⚙ Change Mode → Select Different Mode (back to Phase 2)
|
||||
- ✗ Cancel → Abort
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Test Chain → Create Session Dir → Initialize Tracking → Tracking State
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Structure**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Session ID: CCWT-{target-module-slug}-{date}
|
||||
Session Dir: .workflow/.ccw-test/{session_id}/
|
||||
|
||||
TodoWrite:
|
||||
CCWT:{mode}: [1/n] /command1 [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWT:{mode}: [2/n] /command2 [pending]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
status.json:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "CCWT-...",
|
||||
"mode": "gen|fix|verify|tdd",
|
||||
"status": "running",
|
||||
"testing": { description, target_module, framework, coverage_target },
|
||||
"command_chain": [...],
|
||||
"test_metrics": { total_tests, passed, failed, pass_rate, iteration_count, coverage }
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- TODO: `-> CCWT:fix: [1/2] /workflow:test-fix-gen | CCWT:fix: [2/2] /workflow:test-cycle-execute`
|
||||
- Status File: `.workflow/.ccw-test/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Execute Test Chain
|
||||
|
||||
#### For All Modes (Sequential Execution)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Start Command → Update status (running) → Execute via Skill → Result
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update test_metrics → Next Command
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Error? → YES → Ask Action (Retry/Skip/Abort)
|
||||
→ NO → Continue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### For Fix Mode (Auto-Iteration)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
test-fix-gen completes → test-cycle-execute begins
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Check pass_rate ≥ 95%?
|
||||
↓ ↓
|
||||
YES → Complete NO → Check iteration < max?
|
||||
↓ ↓
|
||||
YES → Iteration NO → Complete
|
||||
| (analyze failures
|
||||
| generate fix
|
||||
| re-execute tests)
|
||||
|
|
||||
└→ Loop back to pass_rate check
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Error Handling Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Command Error → Update status (failed) → Ask User:
|
||||
- Retry → Re-execute (same index)
|
||||
- Skip → Continue next command
|
||||
- Abort → Stop execution
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Test Metrics Update
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
After Each Execution → Collect test_metrics:
|
||||
- total_tests: number
|
||||
- passed/failed: count
|
||||
- pass_rate: percentage
|
||||
- iteration_count: increment (fix mode)
|
||||
- coverage: line/branch/function
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update status.json → Update TODO with iteration info (if fix mode)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 1: Analyze Testing Needs
|
||||
|-- Extract: description, testing_goal, target_module, existing_tests
|
||||
+-- If unclear -> Phase 1.5: Clarify Testing Needs
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 2: Select Test Strategy & Build Chain
|
||||
|-- Detect mode: gen | fix | verify | tdd
|
||||
|-- Build command chain based on mode
|
||||
+-- Configure iteration limits (fix mode)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 3: User Confirmation (optional)
|
||||
|-- Show test strategy
|
||||
+-- Allow mode change
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|-- Create todos with CCWT prefix
|
||||
+-- Initialize .workflow/.ccw-test/{session_id}/status.json
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 5: Execute Test Chain
|
||||
|-- For each command:
|
||||
| |-- Update status.json (current=running)
|
||||
| |-- Execute via Skill
|
||||
| |-- Test-fix cycle: iterate until ≥95% pass or max iterations
|
||||
| |-- Update test_metrics in status.json
|
||||
| +-- Update TODO status
|
||||
+-- Mark status.json as completed
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Pipeline Examples
|
||||
|
||||
| Input | Mode | Pipeline | Iteration |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|-----------|
|
||||
| "Generate tests for auth module" | gen | test-fix-gen | No execution |
|
||||
| "Fix failing authentication tests" | fix | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute (iterate) | Max 3 iterations |
|
||||
| "Run existing test suite" | verify | execute-tests → coverage-report | One-time |
|
||||
| "Implement user profile with TDD" | tdd | tdd-plan → execute → tdd-verify | Red-Green-Refactor |
|
||||
|
||||
**Legend**: `(iterate)` = auto-iteration until ≥95% pass rate
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
### Dual Tracking System
|
||||
|
||||
**1. TodoWrite-Based Tracking** (UI Display):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
// Initial state (fix mode)
|
||||
CCWT:fix: [1/2] /workflow:test-fix-gen [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWT:fix: [2/2] /workflow:test-cycle-execute [pending]
|
||||
|
||||
// During iteration (fix mode, iteration 2/3)
|
||||
CCWT:fix: [1/2] /workflow:test-fix-gen [completed]
|
||||
CCWT:fix: [2/2] /workflow:test-cycle-execute [in_progress] (iteration 2/3, pass rate: 78%)
|
||||
|
||||
// Gen mode (no execution)
|
||||
CCWT:gen: [1/1] /workflow:test-fix-gen [in_progress]
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify mode (one-time)
|
||||
CCWT:verify: [1/2] execute-existing-tests [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWT:verify: [2/2] generate-coverage-report [pending]
|
||||
|
||||
// TDD mode (Red-Green-Refactor)
|
||||
CCWT:tdd: [1/3] /workflow:tdd-plan [in_progress]
|
||||
CCWT:tdd: [2/3] /workflow:execute [pending]
|
||||
CCWT:tdd: [3/3] /workflow:tdd-verify [pending]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Status.json Tracking**: Persistent state for test monitoring.
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `.workflow/.ccw-test/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "CCWT-auth-module-2025-02-02",
|
||||
"mode": "fix",
|
||||
"status": "running|completed|failed",
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-02-02T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2025-02-02T10:05:00Z",
|
||||
"testing": {
|
||||
"description": "Fix failing authentication tests",
|
||||
"target_module": "src/auth/**/*.ts",
|
||||
"framework": "jest",
|
||||
"coverage_target": 80
|
||||
},
|
||||
"command_chain": [
|
||||
{ "index": 0, "command": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "sequential", "status": "completed" },
|
||||
{ "index": 1, "command": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-fix-cycle", "max_iterations": 3, "status": "in_progress" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"current_index": 1,
|
||||
"test_metrics": {
|
||||
"total_tests": 42,
|
||||
"passed": 38,
|
||||
"failed": 4,
|
||||
"pass_rate": 90.5,
|
||||
"iteration_count": 2,
|
||||
"coverage": {
|
||||
"line": 82.3,
|
||||
"branch": 75.6,
|
||||
"function": 88.1
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Status Values**:
|
||||
- `running`: Test workflow in progress
|
||||
- `completed`: Tests passing (≥95%) or generation complete
|
||||
- `failed`: Test workflow aborted
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Metrics** (updated during execution):
|
||||
- `total_tests`: Number of tests executed
|
||||
- `pass_rate`: Percentage of passing tests (target: ≥95%)
|
||||
- `iteration_count`: Number of test-fix iterations (fix mode)
|
||||
- `coverage`: Line/branch/function coverage percentages
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Testing-Focused** - Pure test coordination, no implementation
|
||||
2. **Mode-Driven** - 4 test strategies for different needs
|
||||
3. **Auto-Iteration** - Fix mode iterates until ≥95% pass rate
|
||||
4. **Metrics Tracking** - Real-time test metrics in status.json
|
||||
5. **Coverage-Driven** - Coverage targets guide test generation
|
||||
6. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCWT prefix to isolate test todos
|
||||
7. **TDD Compliance** - TDD mode enforces Red-Green-Refactor cycle
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Auto-select mode
|
||||
/ccw-test "Test user authentication module"
|
||||
|
||||
# Explicit mode selection
|
||||
/ccw-test --mode gen "Generate tests for payment module"
|
||||
/ccw-test --mode fix "Fix failing authentication tests"
|
||||
/ccw-test --mode verify "Validate current test suite"
|
||||
/ccw-test --mode tdd "Implement user profile with TDD"
|
||||
|
||||
# Custom configuration
|
||||
/ccw-test --mode fix --max-iterations 5 --pass-threshold 98 "Fix all tests"
|
||||
/ccw-test --target "src/auth/**/*.ts" "Test authentication module"
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto mode (skip confirmations)
|
||||
/ccw-test --yes "Quick test validation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mode Selection Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User calls: /ccw-test "test description"
|
||||
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "generate", "create", "write test"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Gen (generate only, no execution)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "fix", "repair", "failing"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Fix (auto-iterate until ≥95% pass)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "verify", "validate", "run test"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: Verify (execute existing tests)
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ Keywords: "tdd", "test-driven", "test first"
|
||||
│ └─ Mode: TDD (Red-Green-Refactor cycle)
|
||||
│
|
||||
└─ Default → Fix (most common: fix failing tests)
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,666 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: ccw
|
||||
description: Main workflow orchestrator - analyze intent, select workflow, execute command chain in main process
|
||||
argument-hint: "\"task description\""
|
||||
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(*), Glob(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CCW Command - Main Workflow Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
Main process orchestrator: intent analysis → workflow selection → command chain execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Concept: Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
|
||||
|
||||
**Definition**: A set of commands that must execute together as an atomic group to achieve a meaningful workflow milestone.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why This Matters**:
|
||||
- **Prevents Incomplete States**: Avoid stopping after task generation without execution
|
||||
- **User Experience**: User gets complete results, not intermediate artifacts requiring manual follow-up
|
||||
- **Workflow Integrity**: Maintains logical coherence of multi-step operations
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Units in CCW**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Type | Pattern | Example |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| **Planning + Execution** | plan-cmd → execute-cmd | lite-plan → lite-execute |
|
||||
| **Testing** | test-gen-cmd → test-exec-cmd | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute |
|
||||
| **Review** | review-cmd → fix-cmd | review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix |
|
||||
|
||||
**Atomic Rules**:
|
||||
1. CCW automatically groups commands into minimum units - never splits them
|
||||
2. Pipeline visualization shows units with `【 】` markers
|
||||
3. Error handling preserves unit boundaries (retry/skip affects whole unit)
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Model
|
||||
|
||||
**Synchronous (Main Process)**: Commands execute via Skill in main process, blocking until complete.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input → Analyze Intent → Select Workflow → [Confirm] → Execute Chain
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Skill (blocking)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Update TodoWrite
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Next Command...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**vs ccw-coordinator**: External CLI execution with background tasks and hook callbacks.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5-Phase Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Analyze Intent
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function analyzeIntent(input) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
goal: extractGoal(input),
|
||||
scope: extractScope(input),
|
||||
constraints: extractConstraints(input),
|
||||
task_type: detectTaskType(input), // bugfix|feature|tdd|review|exploration|...
|
||||
complexity: assessComplexity(input), // low|medium|high
|
||||
clarity_score: calculateClarity(input) // 0-3 (>=2 = clear)
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Task type detection (priority order)
|
||||
function detectTaskType(text) {
|
||||
const patterns = {
|
||||
'bugfix-hotfix': /urgent|production|critical/ && /fix|bug/,
|
||||
// With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
|
||||
'brainstorm': /brainstorm|ideation|头脑风暴|创意|发散思维|creative thinking|multi-perspective.*think|compare perspectives|探索.*可能/,
|
||||
'brainstorm-to-issue': /brainstorm.*issue|头脑风暴.*issue|idea.*issue|想法.*issue|从.*头脑风暴|convert.*brainstorm/,
|
||||
'debug-file': /debug.*document|hypothesis.*debug|troubleshoot.*track|investigate.*log|调试.*记录|假设.*验证|systematic debug|深度调试/,
|
||||
'analyze-file': /analyze.*document|explore.*concept|understand.*architecture|investigate.*discuss|collaborative analysis|分析.*讨论|深度.*理解|协作.*分析/,
|
||||
// Standard workflows
|
||||
'bugfix': /fix|bug|error|crash|fail|debug/,
|
||||
'issue-batch': /issues?|batch/ && /fix|resolve/,
|
||||
'issue-transition': /issue workflow|structured workflow|queue|multi-stage/,
|
||||
'exploration': /uncertain|explore|research|what if/,
|
||||
'quick-task': /quick|simple|small/ && /feature|function/,
|
||||
'ui-design': /ui|design|component|style/,
|
||||
'tdd': /tdd|test-driven|test first/,
|
||||
'test-fix': /test fail|fix test|failing test/,
|
||||
'review': /review|code review/,
|
||||
'documentation': /docs|documentation|readme/
|
||||
};
|
||||
for (const [type, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) {
|
||||
if (pattern.test(text)) return type;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 'feature';
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `Type: [task_type] | Goal: [goal] | Complexity: [complexity] | Clarity: [clarity_score]/3`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1.5: Requirement Clarification (if clarity_score < 2)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function clarifyRequirements(analysis) {
|
||||
if (analysis.clarity_score >= 2) return analysis;
|
||||
|
||||
const questions = generateClarificationQuestions(analysis); // Goal, Scope, Constraints
|
||||
const answers = await AskUserQuestion({ questions });
|
||||
return updateAnalysis(analysis, answers);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions**: Goal (Create/Fix/Optimize/Analyze), Scope (Single file/Module/Cross-module/System), Constraints (Backward compat/Skip tests/Urgent hotfix)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Select Workflow & Build Command Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function selectWorkflow(analysis) {
|
||||
const levelMap = {
|
||||
'bugfix-hotfix': { level: 2, flow: 'bugfix.hotfix' },
|
||||
// With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
|
||||
'brainstorm': { level: 4, flow: 'brainstorm-with-file' }, // Multi-perspective ideation
|
||||
'brainstorm-to-issue': { level: 4, flow: 'brainstorm-to-issue' }, // Brainstorm → Issue workflow
|
||||
'debug-file': { level: 3, flow: 'debug-with-file' }, // Hypothesis-driven debugging
|
||||
'analyze-file': { level: 3, flow: 'analyze-with-file' }, // Collaborative analysis
|
||||
// Standard workflows
|
||||
'bugfix': { level: 2, flow: 'bugfix.standard' },
|
||||
'issue-batch': { level: 'Issue', flow: 'issue' },
|
||||
'issue-transition': { level: 2.5, flow: 'rapid-to-issue' }, // Bridge workflow
|
||||
'exploration': { level: 4, flow: 'full' },
|
||||
'quick-task': { level: 1, flow: 'lite-lite-lite' },
|
||||
'ui-design': { level: analysis.complexity === 'high' ? 4 : 3, flow: 'ui' },
|
||||
'tdd': { level: 3, flow: 'tdd' },
|
||||
'test-fix': { level: 3, flow: 'test-fix-gen' },
|
||||
'review': { level: 3, flow: 'review-cycle-fix' },
|
||||
'documentation': { level: 2, flow: 'docs' },
|
||||
'feature': { level: analysis.complexity === 'high' ? 3 : 2, flow: analysis.complexity === 'high' ? 'coupled' : 'rapid' }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const selected = levelMap[analysis.task_type] || levelMap['feature'];
|
||||
return buildCommandChain(selected, analysis);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Build command chain (port-based matching with Minimum Execution Units)
|
||||
function buildCommandChain(workflow, analysis) {
|
||||
const chains = {
|
||||
// Level 1 - Rapid
|
||||
'lite-lite-lite': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-lite-lite', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Level 2 - Lightweight
|
||||
'rapid': [
|
||||
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → lite-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'quick-impl' },
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
])
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Level 2 Bridge - Lightweight to Issue Workflow
|
||||
'rapid-to-issue': [
|
||||
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → convert-to-plan】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl-to-issue' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:convert-to-plan', args: '--latest-lite-plan -y', unit: 'quick-impl-to-issue' },
|
||||
// Auto-continue to issue workflow
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:queue', args: '' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:execute', args: '--queue auto' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'bugfix.standard': [
|
||||
// Unit: Bug Fix【lite-fix → lite-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-fix', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'bug-fix' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'bug-fix' },
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
])
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'bugfix.hotfix': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-fix', args: `--hotfix "${analysis.goal}"` }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'multi-cli-plan': [
|
||||
// Unit: Multi-CLI Planning【multi-cli-plan → lite-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:multi-cli-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'multi-cli' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'multi-cli' },
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
])
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'docs': [
|
||||
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → lite-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'quick-impl' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
|
||||
'brainstorm-with-file': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:brainstorm-with-file', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
|
||||
// Note: Has built-in post-completion options (create plan, create issue, deep analysis)
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Brainstorm-to-Issue workflow (bridge from brainstorm to issue execution)
|
||||
'brainstorm-to-issue': [
|
||||
// Note: Assumes brainstorm session already exists, or run brainstorm first
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:from-brainstorm', args: `SESSION="${extractBrainstormSession(analysis)}" --auto` },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:queue', args: '' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:execute', args: '--queue auto' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'debug-with-file': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:debug-with-file', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
|
||||
// Note: Self-contained with hypothesis-driven iteration and Gemini validation
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'analyze-with-file': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:analyze-with-file', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
|
||||
// Note: Self-contained with multi-round discussion and CLI exploration
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Level 3 - Standard
|
||||
'coupled': [
|
||||
// Unit: Verified Planning【plan → plan-verify】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'verified-planning' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
|
||||
// Execution
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
|
||||
// Unit: Code Review【review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-cycle-fix', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
])
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'tdd': [
|
||||
// Unit: TDD Planning + Execution【tdd-plan → execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'tdd-planning' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '', unit: 'tdd-planning' },
|
||||
// TDD Verification
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-verify', args: '' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'test-fix-gen': [
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'review-cycle-fix': [
|
||||
// Unit: Code Review【review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-cycle-fix', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
'ui': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
|
||||
// Unit: Planning + Execution【plan → execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '', unit: 'plan-execute' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '', unit: 'plan-execute' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Level 4 - Brainstorm
|
||||
'full': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
|
||||
// Unit: Verified Planning【plan → plan-verify】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
|
||||
// Execution
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
|
||||
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
// Issue Workflow
|
||||
'issue': [
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:discover', args: '' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:plan', args: '--all-pending' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:queue', args: '' },
|
||||
{ cmd: '/issue:execute', args: '' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
return chains[workflow.flow] || chains['rapid'];
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `Level [X] - [flow] | Pipeline: [...] | Commands: [1. /cmd1 2. /cmd2 ...]`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function getUserConfirmation(chain) {
|
||||
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Execute this command chain?",
|
||||
header: "Confirm",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Confirm", description: "Start" },
|
||||
{ label: "Adjust", description: "Modify" },
|
||||
{ label: "Cancel", description: "Abort" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (response.error === "Cancel") throw new Error("Cancelled");
|
||||
if (response.error === "Adjust") return await adjustChain(chain);
|
||||
return chain;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function setupTodoTracking(chain, workflow, analysis) {
|
||||
const sessionId = `ccw-${Date.now()}`;
|
||||
const stateDir = `.workflow/.ccw/${sessionId}`;
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p "${stateDir}"`);
|
||||
|
||||
const todos = chain.map((step, i) => ({
|
||||
content: `CCW:${workflow}: [${i + 1}/${chain.length}] ${step.cmd}`,
|
||||
status: i === 0 ? 'in_progress' : 'pending',
|
||||
activeForm: `Executing ${step.cmd}`
|
||||
}));
|
||||
TodoWrite({ todos });
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize status.json for hook tracking
|
||||
const state = {
|
||||
session_id: sessionId,
|
||||
workflow: workflow,
|
||||
status: 'running',
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
analysis: analysis,
|
||||
command_chain: chain.map((step, idx) => ({
|
||||
index: idx,
|
||||
command: step.cmd,
|
||||
status: idx === 0 ? 'running' : 'pending'
|
||||
})),
|
||||
current_index: 0
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
return { sessionId, stateDir, state };
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- TODO: `-> CCW:rapid: [1/3] /workflow:lite-plan | CCW:rapid: [2/3] /workflow:lite-execute | ...`
|
||||
- Status File: `.workflow/.ccw/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Execute Command Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function executeCommandChain(chain, workflow, trackingState) {
|
||||
let previousResult = null;
|
||||
const { sessionId, stateDir, state } = trackingState;
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < chain.length; i++) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Update status: mark current as running
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'running';
|
||||
state.current_index = i;
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
const fullCommand = assembleCommand(chain[i], previousResult);
|
||||
const result = await Skill({ skill: fullCommand });
|
||||
|
||||
previousResult = { ...result, success: true };
|
||||
|
||||
// Update status: mark current as completed, next as running
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'completed';
|
||||
if (i + 1 < chain.length) {
|
||||
state.command_chain[i + 1].status = 'running';
|
||||
}
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
updateTodoStatus(i, chain.length, workflow, 'completed');
|
||||
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
// Update status on error
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'failed';
|
||||
state.status = 'error';
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
const action = await handleError(chain[i], error, i);
|
||||
if (action === 'retry') {
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'pending';
|
||||
state.status = 'running';
|
||||
i--; // Retry
|
||||
} else if (action === 'abort') {
|
||||
state.status = 'failed';
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
return { success: false, error: error.message };
|
||||
}
|
||||
// 'skip' - continue
|
||||
state.status = 'running';
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Mark workflow as completed
|
||||
state.status = 'completed';
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
return { success: true, completed: chain.length, sessionId };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Assemble full command with session/plan parameters
|
||||
function assembleCommand(step, previousResult) {
|
||||
let command = step.cmd;
|
||||
if (step.args) {
|
||||
command += ` ${step.args}`;
|
||||
} else if (previousResult?.session_id) {
|
||||
command += ` --session="${previousResult.session_id}"`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return command;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Update TODO: mark current as complete, next as in-progress
|
||||
function updateTodoStatus(index, total, workflow, status) {
|
||||
const todos = getAllCurrentTodos();
|
||||
const updated = todos.map(todo => {
|
||||
if (todo.content.startsWith(`CCW:${workflow}:`)) {
|
||||
const stepNum = extractStepIndex(todo.content);
|
||||
if (stepNum === index + 1) return { ...todo, status };
|
||||
if (stepNum === index + 2 && status === 'completed') return { ...todo, status: 'in_progress' };
|
||||
}
|
||||
return todo;
|
||||
});
|
||||
TodoWrite({ todos: updated });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Error handling: Retry/Skip/Abort
|
||||
async function handleError(step, error, index) {
|
||||
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `${step.cmd} failed: ${error.message}`,
|
||||
header: "Error",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Retry", description: "Re-execute" },
|
||||
{ label: "Skip", description: "Continue next" },
|
||||
{ label: "Abort", description: "Stop" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
return { Retry: 'retry', Skip: 'skip', Abort: 'abort' }[response.Error] || 'abort';
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 1: Analyze Intent
|
||||
|-- Extract: goal, scope, constraints, task_type, complexity, clarity
|
||||
+-- If clarity < 2 -> Phase 1.5: Clarify Requirements
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 2: Select Workflow & Build Chain
|
||||
|-- Map task_type -> Level (1/2/3/4/Issue)
|
||||
|-- Select flow based on complexity
|
||||
+-- Build command chain (port-based)
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 3: User Confirmation (optional)
|
||||
|-- Show pipeline visualization
|
||||
+-- Allow adjustment
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|
||||
|-- Create todos with CCW prefix
|
||||
+-- Initialize .workflow/.ccw/{session_id}/status.json
|
||||
|
|
||||
Phase 5: Execute Command Chain
|
||||
|-- For each command:
|
||||
| |-- Update status.json (current=running)
|
||||
| |-- Assemble full command
|
||||
| |-- Execute via Skill
|
||||
| |-- Update status.json (current=completed, next=running)
|
||||
| |-- Update TODO status
|
||||
| +-- Handle errors (retry/skip/abort)
|
||||
+-- Mark status.json as completed
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Pipeline Examples (with Minimum Execution Units)
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: `【 】` marks Minimum Execution Units - commands execute together as atomic groups.
|
||||
|
||||
| Input | Type | Level | Pipeline (with Units) |
|
||||
|-------|------|-------|-----------------------|
|
||||
| "Add API endpoint" | feature (low) | 2 |【lite-plan → lite-execute】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
|
||||
| "Fix login timeout" | bugfix | 2 |【lite-fix → lite-execute】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
|
||||
| "Use issue workflow" | issue-transition | 2.5 |【lite-plan → convert-to-plan】→ queue → execute |
|
||||
| "头脑风暴: 通知系统重构" | brainstorm | 4 | brainstorm-with-file → (built-in post-completion) |
|
||||
| "从头脑风暴创建 issue" | brainstorm-to-issue | 4 | from-brainstorm → queue → execute |
|
||||
| "深度调试 WebSocket 连接断开" | debug-file | 3 | debug-with-file → (hypothesis iteration) |
|
||||
| "协作分析: 认证架构优化" | analyze-file | 3 | analyze-with-file → (multi-round discussion) |
|
||||
| "OAuth2 system" | feature (high) | 3 |【plan → plan-verify】→ execute →【review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
|
||||
| "Implement with TDD" | tdd | 3 |【tdd-plan → execute】→ tdd-verify |
|
||||
| "Uncertain: real-time arch" | exploration | 4 | brainstorm:auto-parallel →【plan → plan-verify】→ execute →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Main Process Execution** - Use Skill in main process, no external CLI
|
||||
2. **Intent-Driven** - Auto-select workflow based on task intent
|
||||
3. **Port-Based Chaining** - Build command chain using port matching
|
||||
4. **Minimum Execution Units** - Commands grouped into atomic units, never split (e.g., lite-plan → lite-execute)
|
||||
5. **Progressive Clarification** - Low clarity triggers clarification phase
|
||||
6. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCW prefix to isolate workflow todos
|
||||
7. **Unit-Aware Error Handling** - Retry/skip/abort affects whole unit, not individual commands
|
||||
8. **User Control** - Optional user confirmation at each phase
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## State Management
|
||||
|
||||
### Dual Tracking System
|
||||
|
||||
**1. TodoWrite-Based Tracking** (UI Display): All execution state tracked via TodoWrite with `CCW:` prefix.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Initial state
|
||||
todos = [
|
||||
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [1/3] /workflow:lite-plan", status: "in_progress" },
|
||||
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [2/3] /workflow:lite-execute", status: "pending" },
|
||||
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [3/3] /workflow:test-cycle-execute", status: "pending" }
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
// After command 1 completes
|
||||
todos = [
|
||||
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [1/3] /workflow:lite-plan", status: "completed" },
|
||||
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [2/3] /workflow:lite-execute", status: "in_progress" },
|
||||
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [3/3] /workflow:test-cycle-execute", status: "pending" }
|
||||
];
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Status.json Tracking**: Persistent state file for workflow monitoring.
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `.workflow/.ccw/{session_id}/status.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure**:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "ccw-1706123456789",
|
||||
"workflow": "rapid",
|
||||
"status": "running|completed|failed|error",
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-02-01T10:30:00Z",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2025-02-01T10:35:00Z",
|
||||
"analysis": {
|
||||
"goal": "Add user authentication",
|
||||
"scope": ["auth"],
|
||||
"constraints": [],
|
||||
"task_type": "feature",
|
||||
"complexity": "medium"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"command_chain": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 0,
|
||||
"command": "/workflow:lite-plan",
|
||||
"status": "completed"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 1,
|
||||
"command": "/workflow:lite-execute",
|
||||
"status": "running"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 2,
|
||||
"command": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
|
||||
"status": "pending"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"current_index": 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Status Values**:
|
||||
- `running`: Workflow executing commands
|
||||
- `completed`: All commands finished
|
||||
- `failed`: User aborted or unrecoverable error
|
||||
- `error`: Command execution failed (during error handling)
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Status Values**:
|
||||
- `pending`: Not started
|
||||
- `running`: Currently executing
|
||||
- `completed`: Successfully finished
|
||||
- `failed`: Execution failed
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## With-File Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
**With-File workflows** provide documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration. They are self-contained and generate comprehensive session artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
| Workflow | Purpose | Key Features | Output Folder |
|
||||
|----------|---------|--------------|---------------|
|
||||
| **brainstorm-with-file** | Multi-perspective ideation | Gemini/Codex/Claude perspectives, diverge-converge cycles | `.workflow/.brainstorm/` |
|
||||
| **debug-with-file** | Hypothesis-driven debugging | Gemini validation, understanding evolution, NDJSON logging | `.workflow/.debug/` |
|
||||
| **analyze-with-file** | Collaborative analysis | Multi-round Q&A, CLI exploration, documented discussions | `.workflow/.analysis/` |
|
||||
|
||||
**Detection Keywords**:
|
||||
- **brainstorm**: 头脑风暴, 创意, 发散思维, multi-perspective, compare perspectives
|
||||
- **debug-file**: 深度调试, 假设验证, systematic debug, hypothesis debug
|
||||
- **analyze-file**: 协作分析, 深度理解, collaborative analysis, explore concept
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics**:
|
||||
1. **Self-Contained**: Each workflow handles its own iteration loop
|
||||
2. **Documented Process**: Creates evolving documents (brainstorm.md, understanding.md, discussion.md)
|
||||
3. **Multi-CLI**: Uses Gemini/Codex/Claude for different perspectives
|
||||
4. **Built-in Post-Completion**: Offers follow-up options (create plan, issue, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Auto-select workflow
|
||||
/ccw "Add user authentication"
|
||||
|
||||
# Complex requirement (triggers clarification)
|
||||
/ccw "Optimize system performance"
|
||||
|
||||
# Bug fix
|
||||
/ccw "Fix memory leak in WebSocket handler"
|
||||
|
||||
# TDD development
|
||||
/ccw "Implement user registration with TDD"
|
||||
|
||||
# Exploratory task
|
||||
/ccw "Uncertain about architecture for real-time notifications"
|
||||
|
||||
# With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
|
||||
/ccw "头脑风暴: 用户通知系统重新设计" # → brainstorm-with-file
|
||||
/ccw "从头脑风暴 BS-通知系统-2025-01-28 创建 issue" # → brainstorm-to-issue (bridge)
|
||||
/ccw "深度调试: 系统随机崩溃问题" # → debug-with-file
|
||||
/ccw "协作分析: 理解现有认证架构的设计决策" # → analyze-with-file
|
||||
```
|
||||
87
.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md
Normal file
87
.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: analyze
|
||||
description: Read-only codebase analysis using Gemini (default), Qwen, or Codex with auto-pattern detection and template selection
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*), Task(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Analyze Command (/cli:analyze)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Read-only - does NOT modify code**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Selection**:
|
||||
- **gemini** (default) - Best for code analysis
|
||||
- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
|
||||
- **codex** - Alternative for deep analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
|
||||
- `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini** (Primary):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool gemini # or omit (default)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen** (Fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool qwen
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex** (Alternative):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool codex
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Codebase analysis with pattern detection",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${analysis_target}
|
||||
Mode: analyze
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
|
||||
Execute codebase analysis with auto-pattern detection:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Context Discovery:
|
||||
- Extract keywords from analysis target
|
||||
- Auto-detect file patterns (auth→auth files, component→components, etc.)
|
||||
- Discover additional relevant files using MCP
|
||||
- Build comprehensive file context
|
||||
|
||||
2. Template Selection:
|
||||
- Auto-select analysis template based on keywords
|
||||
- Apply appropriate analysis methodology
|
||||
- Include @CLAUDE.md for project context
|
||||
|
||||
3. CLI Command Construction:
|
||||
- Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for deep analysis)
|
||||
- Context: @CLAUDE.md + auto-detected patterns + discovered files
|
||||
- Mode: analysis (read-only)
|
||||
- Expected: Insights, recommendations, pattern analysis
|
||||
|
||||
4. Execution & Output:
|
||||
- Execute CLI tool with assembled context
|
||||
- Generate comprehensive analysis report
|
||||
- Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Read-only**: Analyzes code, does NOT modify files
|
||||
- **Auto-pattern**: Detects file patterns from keywords (auth→auth files, component→components, API→api/routes, test→test files)
|
||||
- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
82
.claude/commands/cli/chat.md
Normal file
82
.claude/commands/cli/chat.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: chat
|
||||
description: Read-only Q&A interaction with Gemini/Qwen/Codex for codebase questions with automatic context inference
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Read-only - does NOT modify code**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Selection**:
|
||||
- **gemini** (default) - Best for Q&A and explanations
|
||||
- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
|
||||
- **codex** - Alternative for technical deep-dives
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt`
|
||||
- `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini** (Primary):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool gemini # or omit (default)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen** (Fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool qwen
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex** (Alternative):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool codex
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated Q&A:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Codebase Q&A with intelligent context discovery",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${inquiry}
|
||||
Mode: chat
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
|
||||
Execute codebase Q&A with intelligent context discovery:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Context Discovery:
|
||||
- Parse inquiry to identify relevant topics/keywords
|
||||
- Discover related files using MCP/ripgrep (prioritize precision)
|
||||
- Include @CLAUDE.md + discovered files
|
||||
- Validate context relevance to question
|
||||
|
||||
2. CLI Command Construction:
|
||||
- Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for deep dives)
|
||||
- Context: @CLAUDE.md + discovered file patterns
|
||||
- Mode: analysis (read-only)
|
||||
- Expected: Clear, accurate answer with code references
|
||||
|
||||
3. Execution & Output:
|
||||
- Execute CLI tool with assembled context
|
||||
- Validate answer completeness
|
||||
- Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Read-only**: Provides answers, does NOT modify code
|
||||
- **Context**: `@CLAUDE.md` + inferred or all files (`@**/*`)
|
||||
- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ name: cli-init
|
||||
description: Generate .gemini/ and .qwen/ config directories with settings.json and ignore files based on workspace technology detection
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|all] [--output path] [--preview]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
|
||||
group: cli
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Initialization Command (/cli:cli-init)
|
||||
@@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ target/
|
||||
### Step 2: Workspace Analysis (MANDATORY FIRST)
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Analyze workspace structure
|
||||
bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{"format":"json"}')
|
||||
bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh json)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Technology Detection
|
||||
@@ -429,6 +428,15 @@ docker-compose.override.yml
|
||||
/cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
- **Automatic Detection**: No manual configuration needed
|
||||
- **Multi-Tool Support**: Configure Gemini and Qwen simultaneously
|
||||
- **Technology Aware**: Rules adapted to actual project stack
|
||||
- **Maintainable**: Clear sections for easy customization
|
||||
- **Consistent**: Follows gitignore syntax standards
|
||||
- **Safe**: Creates backups of existing files
|
||||
- **Flexible**: Initialize specific tools or all at once
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Selection Guide
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
519
.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md
Normal file
519
.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,519 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: codex-execute
|
||||
description: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition into grouped subtasks using resume mechanism for context continuity
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Codex Execute Command (/cli:codex-execute)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Automated task decomposition and sequential execution with Codex, using `codex exec "..." resume --last` mechanism for continuity between subtasks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**: User description or task ID (automatically loads from `.task/[ID].json` if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Task Input → Analyze Dependencies → Create Task Flow Diagram →
|
||||
Decompose into Subtask Groups → TodoWrite Tracking →
|
||||
For Each Subtask Group:
|
||||
For First Subtask in Group:
|
||||
0. Stage existing changes (git add -A) if valid git repo
|
||||
1. Execute with Codex (new session)
|
||||
2. [Optional] Git verification
|
||||
3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
|
||||
For Related Subtasks in Same Group:
|
||||
0. Stage changes from previous subtask
|
||||
1. Execute with `codex exec "..." resume --last` (continue session)
|
||||
2. [Optional] Git verification
|
||||
3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
|
||||
→ Final Summary
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `<input>` (Required): Task description or task ID (e.g., "implement auth" or "IMPL-001")
|
||||
- If input matches task ID format, loads from `.task/[ID].json`
|
||||
- Otherwise, uses input as task description
|
||||
- `--verify-git` (Optional): Verify git status after each subtask completion
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Input Processing & Task Flow Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Parse Input**:
|
||||
- Check if input matches task ID pattern (e.g., `IMPL-001`, `TASK-123`)
|
||||
- If yes: Load from `.task/[ID].json` and extract requirements
|
||||
- If no: Use input as task description directly
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Analyze Dependencies & Create Task Flow Diagram**:
|
||||
- Analyze task complexity and scope
|
||||
- Identify dependencies and relationships between subtasks
|
||||
- Create visual task flow diagram showing:
|
||||
- Independent task groups (parallel execution possible)
|
||||
- Sequential dependencies (must use resume)
|
||||
- Branching logic (conditional paths)
|
||||
- Display flow diagram for user review
|
||||
|
||||
**Task Flow Diagram Format**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
[Group A: Auth Core]
|
||||
A1: Create user model ──┐
|
||||
A2: Add validation ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
|
||||
│
|
||||
[Group B: API Layer] │
|
||||
B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
|
||||
B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
|
||||
|
||||
[Group C: Testing]
|
||||
C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
|
||||
C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Diagram Symbols**:
|
||||
- `──►` Sequential dependency (must resume previous session)
|
||||
- `─┐` Branch point (multiple paths)
|
||||
- `─┘` Merge point (wait for completion)
|
||||
- `[resume]` Use `codex exec "..." resume --last`
|
||||
- `[new session]` Start fresh Codex session
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Decompose into Subtask Groups**:
|
||||
- Group related subtasks that share context
|
||||
- Break down into 3-8 subtasks total
|
||||
- Assign each subtask to a group
|
||||
- Create TodoWrite tracker with groups
|
||||
- Display decomposition for user review
|
||||
|
||||
**Decomposition Criteria**:
|
||||
- Each subtask: 5-15 minutes completable
|
||||
- Clear, testable outcomes
|
||||
- Explicit dependencies
|
||||
- Focused file scope (1-5 files per subtask)
|
||||
- **Group coherence**: Subtasks in same group share context/files
|
||||
|
||||
### File Discovery for Task Decomposition
|
||||
|
||||
Use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files, then group by domain:
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow**: Discover → Analyze scope → Group by files → Create task flow
|
||||
|
||||
**Example**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Discover files
|
||||
rg "authentication" --files-with-matches --type ts
|
||||
|
||||
# Group by domain
|
||||
# Group A: src/auth/model.ts, src/auth/schema.ts
|
||||
# Group B: src/api/auth.ts, src/middleware/auth.ts
|
||||
# Group C: tests/auth/*.test.ts
|
||||
|
||||
# Each group becomes a session with related subtasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
File patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Group-Based Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Pre-Execution Git Staging** (if valid git repository):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Stage all current changes before codex execution
|
||||
# This makes codex changes clearly visible in git diff
|
||||
git add -A
|
||||
git status --short
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**For First Subtask in Each Group** (New Session):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Start new Codex session for independent task group
|
||||
codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
|
||||
PURPOSE: [group goal]
|
||||
TASK: [subtask description - first in group]
|
||||
CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @CLAUDE.md
|
||||
EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
|
||||
RULES: [constraints]
|
||||
Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
|
||||
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**For Related Subtasks in Same Group** (Resume Session):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Stage changes from previous subtask (if valid git repository)
|
||||
git add -A
|
||||
|
||||
# Resume session ONLY for subtasks in same group
|
||||
codex exec "
|
||||
CONTINUE IN SAME GROUP:
|
||||
Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask N of M
|
||||
|
||||
PURPOSE: [continuation goal within group]
|
||||
TASK: [subtask N description]
|
||||
CONTEXT: Previous work in this group completed, now focus on @{new_relevant_files}
|
||||
EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
|
||||
RULES: Build on previous subtask in group, maintain consistency
|
||||
" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**For First Subtask in Different Group** (New Session):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Stage changes from previous group
|
||||
git add -A
|
||||
|
||||
# Start NEW session for different group (no resume)
|
||||
codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
|
||||
PURPOSE: [new group goal]
|
||||
TASK: [subtask description - first in new group]
|
||||
CONTEXT: @{different_files} @CLAUDE.md
|
||||
EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
|
||||
RULES: [constraints]
|
||||
Group [Y]: [new group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
|
||||
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Resume Decision Logic**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
if (subtask.group == previous_subtask.group):
|
||||
use `codex exec "..." resume --last` # Continue session
|
||||
else:
|
||||
use `codex -C [dir] exec "..."` # New session
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Verification (if --verify-git enabled)
|
||||
|
||||
After each subtask completion:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check git status
|
||||
git status --short
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify expected changes
|
||||
git diff --stat
|
||||
|
||||
# Optional: Check for untracked files that should be committed
|
||||
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Verification Checks**:
|
||||
- Files modified match subtask scope
|
||||
- No unexpected changes in unrelated files
|
||||
- No merge conflicts or errors
|
||||
- Code compiles/runs (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: TodoWrite Tracking with Groups
|
||||
|
||||
**Initial Setup with Task Flow**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
TodoWrite({
|
||||
todos: [
|
||||
// Display task flow diagram first
|
||||
{ content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
|
||||
|
||||
// Group A subtasks (will use resume within group)
|
||||
{ content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
|
||||
|
||||
// Group B subtasks (new session, then resume within group)
|
||||
{ content: "[Group B] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 1" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Group B] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 2" },
|
||||
|
||||
// Group C subtasks (new session)
|
||||
{ content: "[Group C] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group C subtask 1" },
|
||||
|
||||
{ content: "Final verification and summary", status: "pending", activeForm: "Verifying and summarizing" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After Each Subtask**:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
TodoWrite({
|
||||
todos: [
|
||||
{ content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "completed", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
|
||||
// ... update status
|
||||
]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Codex Resume Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
**Why Group-Based Resume?**
|
||||
- **Within Group**: Maintains conversation context for related subtasks
|
||||
- Codex remembers previous decisions and patterns
|
||||
- Reduces context repetition
|
||||
- Ensures consistency in implementation style
|
||||
- **Between Groups**: Fresh session for independent tasks
|
||||
- Avoids context pollution from unrelated work
|
||||
- Prevents confusion when switching domains
|
||||
- Maintains focused attention on current group
|
||||
|
||||
**How It Works**:
|
||||
1. **First subtask in Group A**: Creates new Codex session
|
||||
2. **Subsequent subtasks in Group A**: Use `codex resume --last` to continue session
|
||||
3. **First subtask in Group B**: Creates NEW Codex session (no resume)
|
||||
4. **Subsequent subtasks in Group B**: Use `codex resume --last` within Group B
|
||||
5. Each group builds on its own context, isolated from other groups
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Resume vs New Session**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
RESUME (same group):
|
||||
- Subtasks share files/modules
|
||||
- Logical continuation of previous work
|
||||
- Same architectural domain
|
||||
|
||||
NEW SESSION (different group):
|
||||
- Independent task area
|
||||
- Different files/modules
|
||||
- Switching architectural domains
|
||||
- Testing after implementation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Image Support**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# First subtask with design reference
|
||||
codex -C [dir] -i design.png --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
|
||||
# Resume for next subtask (image context preserved)
|
||||
codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
**Subtask Failure**:
|
||||
1. Mark subtask as blocked in TodoWrite
|
||||
2. Report error details to user
|
||||
3. Pause execution for manual intervention
|
||||
4. Use AskUserQuestion for recovery decision:
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Codex execution failed for the subtask. How should the workflow proceed?",
|
||||
header: "Recovery",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Retry Subtask", description: "Attempt to execute the same subtask again." },
|
||||
{ label: "Skip Subtask", description: "Continue to the next subtask in the plan." },
|
||||
{ label: "Abort Workflow", description: "Stop the entire execution." }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Git Verification Failure** (if --verify-git):
|
||||
1. Show unexpected changes
|
||||
2. Pause execution
|
||||
3. Request user decision:
|
||||
- Continue anyway
|
||||
- Rollback and retry
|
||||
- Manual fix
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex Session Lost**:
|
||||
1. Detect if `codex exec "..." resume --last` fails
|
||||
2. Attempt retry with fresh session
|
||||
3. Report to user if manual intervention needed
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
**During Execution**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Task Flow Diagram:
|
||||
[Group A: Auth Core]
|
||||
A1: Create user model ──┐
|
||||
A2: Add validation ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
|
||||
│
|
||||
[Group B: API Layer] │
|
||||
B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
|
||||
B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
|
||||
|
||||
[Group C: Testing]
|
||||
C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
|
||||
C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
|
||||
|
||||
Task Decomposition:
|
||||
[Group A] 1. Create user model
|
||||
[Group A] 2. Add validation logic [resume]
|
||||
[Group A] 3. Implement database schema [resume]
|
||||
[Group B] 4. Create auth endpoints [new session]
|
||||
[Group B] 5. Add middleware [resume]
|
||||
[Group B] 6. Error handling [resume]
|
||||
[Group C] 7. Unit tests [new session]
|
||||
[Group C] 8. Integration tests [resume]
|
||||
|
||||
[Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
|
||||
Starting new Codex session for Group A...
|
||||
[Codex output]
|
||||
Subtask 1 completed
|
||||
|
||||
Git Verification:
|
||||
M src/models/user.ts
|
||||
Changes verified
|
||||
|
||||
[Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
|
||||
Resuming Codex session (same group)...
|
||||
[Codex output]
|
||||
Subtask 2 completed
|
||||
|
||||
[Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
|
||||
Starting NEW Codex session for Group B...
|
||||
[Codex output]
|
||||
Subtask 4 completed
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
All Subtasks Completed
|
||||
Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Final Summary**:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Task Execution Summary: [Task Description]
|
||||
|
||||
## Subtasks Completed
|
||||
1. [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
|
||||
2. [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Modified
|
||||
- src/file1.ts:10-50 - [changes]
|
||||
- src/file2.ts - [changes]
|
||||
|
||||
## Git Status
|
||||
- N files modified
|
||||
- M files added
|
||||
- No conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
- [Suggested follow-up actions]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
**Example 1: Simple Task with Groups**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
|
||||
|
||||
# Task Flow Diagram:
|
||||
# [Group A: Data Layer]
|
||||
# A1: Create user model ──► [resume] ──► A2: Database schema
|
||||
#
|
||||
# [Group B: Auth Logic]
|
||||
# B1: JWT token generation ──► [new session]
|
||||
# B2: Authentication middleware ──► [resume]
|
||||
#
|
||||
# [Group C: API Endpoints]
|
||||
# C1: Login/logout endpoints ──► [new session]
|
||||
#
|
||||
# [Group D: Testing]
|
||||
# D1: Unit tests ──► [new session]
|
||||
# D2: Integration tests ──► [resume]
|
||||
|
||||
# Execution:
|
||||
# Group A: A1 (new) → A2 (resume)
|
||||
# Group B: B1 (new) → B2 (resume)
|
||||
# Group C: C1 (new)
|
||||
# Group D: D1 (new) → D2 (resume)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example 2: With Git Verification**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer to use dependency injection"
|
||||
|
||||
# After each subtask, verifies:
|
||||
# - Only expected files modified
|
||||
# - No breaking changes in unrelated code
|
||||
# - Tests still pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example 3: With Task ID**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
|
||||
|
||||
# Loads task from .task/IMPL-001.json
|
||||
# Decomposes based on task requirements
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Task Flow First**: Always create visual flow diagram before execution
|
||||
2. **Group Related Work**: Cluster subtasks by domain/files for efficient resume
|
||||
3. **Subtask Granularity**: Keep subtasks small and focused (5-15 min each)
|
||||
4. **Clear Boundaries**: Each subtask should have well-defined input/output
|
||||
5. **Git Hygiene**: Use `--verify-git` for critical refactoring
|
||||
6. **Pre-Execution Staging**: Stage changes before each subtask to clearly see codex modifications
|
||||
7. **Smart Resume**: Use `resume --last` ONLY within same group
|
||||
8. **Fresh Sessions**: Start new session when switching to different group/domain
|
||||
9. **Recovery Points**: TodoWrite with group labels provides clear progress tracking
|
||||
10. **Image References**: Attach design files for UI tasks (first subtask in group)
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Processing
|
||||
|
||||
**Automatic Detection**:
|
||||
- Input matches task ID pattern → Load from `.task/[ID].json`
|
||||
- Otherwise → Use as task description
|
||||
|
||||
**Task JSON Structure** (when loading from file):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"task_id": "IMPL-001",
|
||||
"title": "Implement user authentication",
|
||||
"description": "Create JWT-based auth system",
|
||||
"acceptance_criteria": [...],
|
||||
"scope": {...},
|
||||
"brainstorming_refs": [...]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Routing
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Log Destination**:
|
||||
- **IF** active workflow session exists:
|
||||
- Execution log: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
- Task summaries: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
|
||||
- Task updates: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.task/[TASK-ID].json` status updates
|
||||
- TodoWrite tracking: Embedded in execution log
|
||||
- **ELSE** (no active session):
|
||||
- **Recommended**: Create workflow session first (`/workflow:session:start`)
|
||||
- **Alternative**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Files** (during execution):
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/active/WFS-[session-id]/
|
||||
├── .chat/
|
||||
│ └── codex-execute-20250105-143022.md # Full execution log with task flow
|
||||
├── .summaries/
|
||||
│ ├── IMPL-001.1-summary.md # Subtask summaries
|
||||
│ ├── IMPL-001.2-summary.md
|
||||
│ └── IMPL-001-summary.md # Final task summary
|
||||
└── .task/
|
||||
├── IMPL-001.json # Updated task status
|
||||
└── [subtask JSONs if decomposed]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing multi-stage auth implementation:
|
||||
- Log: `.workflow/active/WFS-auth-system/.chat/codex-execute-20250105-143022.md`
|
||||
- Summaries: `.workflow/active/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001.{1,2,3}-summary.md`
|
||||
- Task status: `.workflow/active/WFS-auth-system/.task/IMPL-001.json` (status: completed)
|
||||
- No session, ad-hoc multi-stage task:
|
||||
- Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-auth-refactor-20250105-143045.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Save Results**:
|
||||
- Execution log with task flow diagram and TodoWrite tracking
|
||||
- Individual summaries for each completed subtask
|
||||
- Final consolidated summary when all subtasks complete
|
||||
- Modified code files throughout project
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**vs. `/cli:execute`**:
|
||||
- `/cli:execute`: Single-shot execution with Gemini/Qwen/Codex
|
||||
- `/cli:codex-execute`: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition and resume mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
**Input Flexibility**: Accepts both freeform descriptions and task IDs (auto-detects and loads JSON)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Details**:
|
||||
- Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
|
||||
- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes
|
||||
@@ -1,361 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: codex-review
|
||||
description: Interactive code review using Codex CLI via ccw endpoint with configurable review target, model, and custom instructions
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--uncommitted|--base <branch>|--commit <sha>] [--model <model>] [--title <title>] [prompt]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: Bash(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Codex Review Command (/cli:codex-review)
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Interactive code review command that invokes `codex review` via ccw cli endpoint with guided parameter selection.
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex Review Parameters** (from `codex review --help`):
|
||||
| Parameter | Description |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `[PROMPT]` | Custom review instructions (positional) |
|
||||
| `-c model=<model>` | Override model via config |
|
||||
| `--uncommitted` | Review staged, unstaged, and untracked changes |
|
||||
| `--base <BRANCH>` | Review changes against base branch |
|
||||
| `--commit <SHA>` | Review changes introduced by a commit |
|
||||
| `--title <TITLE>` | Optional commit title for review summary |
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt Template Format
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the standard ccw cli prompt template:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: [what] + [why] + [success criteria] + [constraints/scope]
|
||||
TASK: • [step 1] • [step 2] • [step 3]
|
||||
MODE: review
|
||||
CONTEXT: [review target description] | Memory: [relevant context]
|
||||
EXPECTED: [deliverable format] + [quality criteria]
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: [focus constraints]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS - START HERE
|
||||
|
||||
**When this command is triggered, follow these exact steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Parse Arguments
|
||||
|
||||
Check if user provided arguments directly:
|
||||
- `--uncommitted` → Record target = uncommitted
|
||||
- `--base <branch>` → Record target = base, branch name
|
||||
- `--commit <sha>` → Record target = commit, sha value
|
||||
- `--model <model>` → Record model selection
|
||||
- `--title <title>` → Record title
|
||||
- Remaining text → Use as custom focus/prompt
|
||||
|
||||
If no target specified → Continue to Step 2 for interactive selection.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Interactive Parameter Selection
|
||||
|
||||
**2.1 Review Target Selection**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "What do you want to review?",
|
||||
header: "Review Target",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Uncommitted changes (Recommended)", description: "Review staged, unstaged, and untracked changes" },
|
||||
{ label: "Compare to branch", description: "Review changes against a base branch (e.g., main)" },
|
||||
{ label: "Specific commit", description: "Review changes introduced by a specific commit" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2.2 Branch/Commit Input (if needed)**
|
||||
|
||||
If "Compare to branch" selected:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Which base branch to compare against?",
|
||||
header: "Base Branch",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "main", description: "Compare against main branch" },
|
||||
{ label: "master", description: "Compare against master branch" },
|
||||
{ label: "develop", description: "Compare against develop branch" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If "Specific commit" selected:
|
||||
- Run `git log --oneline -10` to show recent commits
|
||||
- Ask user to provide commit SHA or select from list
|
||||
|
||||
**2.3 Model Selection (Optional)**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Which model to use for review?",
|
||||
header: "Model",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Default", description: "Use codex default model (gpt-5.2)" },
|
||||
{ label: "o3", description: "OpenAI o3 reasoning model" },
|
||||
{ label: "gpt-4.1", description: "GPT-4.1 model" },
|
||||
{ label: "o4-mini", description: "OpenAI o4-mini (faster)" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2.4 Review Focus Selection**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "What should the review focus on?",
|
||||
header: "Focus Area",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "General review (Recommended)", description: "Comprehensive review: correctness, style, bugs, docs" },
|
||||
{ label: "Security focus", description: "Security vulnerabilities, input validation, auth issues" },
|
||||
{ label: "Performance focus", description: "Performance bottlenecks, complexity, resource usage" },
|
||||
{ label: "Code quality", description: "Readability, maintainability, SOLID principles" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Build Prompt and Command
|
||||
|
||||
**3.1 Construct Prompt Based on Focus**
|
||||
|
||||
**General Review Prompt:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: Comprehensive code review to identify issues, improve quality, and ensure best practices; success = actionable feedback with clear priorities
|
||||
TASK: • Review code correctness and logic errors • Check coding standards and consistency • Identify potential bugs and edge cases • Evaluate documentation completeness
|
||||
MODE: review
|
||||
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Project conventions from CLAUDE.md
|
||||
EXPECTED: Structured review report with: severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, specific improvement suggestions, priority ranking
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on actionable feedback
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Security Focus Prompt:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: Security-focused code review to identify vulnerabilities and security risks; success = all security issues documented with remediation
|
||||
TASK: • Scan for injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command) • Check authentication and authorization logic • Evaluate input validation and sanitization • Identify sensitive data exposure risks
|
||||
MODE: review
|
||||
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Security best practices, OWASP Top 10
|
||||
EXPECTED: Security report with: vulnerability classification, CVE references where applicable, remediation code snippets, risk severity matrix
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Security-first analysis | Flag all potential vulnerabilities
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Performance Focus Prompt:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: Performance-focused code review to identify bottlenecks and optimization opportunities; success = measurable improvement recommendations
|
||||
TASK: • Analyze algorithmic complexity (Big-O) • Identify memory allocation issues • Check for N+1 queries and blocking operations • Evaluate caching opportunities
|
||||
MODE: review
|
||||
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Performance patterns and anti-patterns
|
||||
EXPECTED: Performance report with: complexity analysis, bottleneck identification, optimization suggestions with expected impact, benchmark recommendations
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Performance optimization focus
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Code Quality Focus Prompt:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: Code quality review to improve maintainability and readability; success = cleaner, more maintainable code
|
||||
TASK: • Assess SOLID principles adherence • Identify code duplication and abstraction opportunities • Review naming conventions and clarity • Evaluate test coverage implications
|
||||
MODE: review
|
||||
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Project coding standards
|
||||
EXPECTED: Quality report with: principle violations, refactoring suggestions, naming improvements, maintainability score
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Code quality and maintainability focus
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3.2 Build Target Description**
|
||||
|
||||
Based on selection, set `{target_description}`:
|
||||
- Uncommitted: `Reviewing uncommitted changes (staged + unstaged + untracked)`
|
||||
- Base branch: `Reviewing changes against {branch} branch`
|
||||
- Commit: `Reviewing changes introduced by commit {sha}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Execute via CCW CLI
|
||||
|
||||
Build and execute the ccw cli command:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Base structure
|
||||
ccw cli -p "<PROMPT>" --tool codex --mode review [OPTIONS]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Command Construction:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Variables from user selection
|
||||
TARGET_FLAG="" # --uncommitted | --base <branch> | --commit <sha>
|
||||
MODEL_FLAG="" # --model <model> (if not default)
|
||||
TITLE_FLAG="" # --title "<title>" (if provided)
|
||||
|
||||
# Build target flag
|
||||
if [ "$target" = "uncommitted" ]; then
|
||||
TARGET_FLAG="--uncommitted"
|
||||
elif [ "$target" = "base" ]; then
|
||||
TARGET_FLAG="--base $branch"
|
||||
elif [ "$target" = "commit" ]; then
|
||||
TARGET_FLAG="--commit $sha"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Build model flag (only if not default)
|
||||
if [ "$model" != "default" ] && [ -n "$model" ]; then
|
||||
MODEL_FLAG="--model $model"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Build title flag (if provided)
|
||||
if [ -n "$title" ]; then
|
||||
TITLE_FLAG="--title \"$title\""
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Execute
|
||||
ccw cli -p "$PROMPT" --tool codex --mode review $TARGET_FLAG $MODEL_FLAG $TITLE_FLAG
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Full Example Commands:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Option 1: With custom prompt (reviews uncommitted by default):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Comprehensive code review to identify issues and improve quality; success = actionable feedback with priorities
|
||||
TASK: • Review correctness and logic • Check standards compliance • Identify bugs and edge cases • Evaluate documentation
|
||||
MODE: review
|
||||
CONTEXT: Reviewing uncommitted changes | Memory: Project conventions
|
||||
EXPECTED: Structured report with severity levels, file:line refs, improvement suggestions
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Actionable feedback
|
||||
" --tool codex --mode review --rule analysis-review-code-quality
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Option 2: Target flag only (no prompt allowed):**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Execute and Display Results
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
Bash({
|
||||
command: "ccw cli -p \"$PROMPT\" --tool codex --mode review $FLAGS",
|
||||
run_in_background: true
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Wait for completion and display formatted results.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Usage Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Execution (No Interaction)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Review uncommitted changes with default settings
|
||||
/cli:codex-review --uncommitted
|
||||
|
||||
# Review against main branch
|
||||
/cli:codex-review --base main
|
||||
|
||||
# Review specific commit
|
||||
/cli:codex-review --commit abc123
|
||||
|
||||
# Review with custom model
|
||||
/cli:codex-review --uncommitted --model o3
|
||||
|
||||
# Review with security focus
|
||||
/cli:codex-review --uncommitted security
|
||||
|
||||
# Full options
|
||||
/cli:codex-review --base main --model o3 --title "Auth Feature" security
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Interactive Mode
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Start interactive selection (guided flow)
|
||||
/cli:codex-review
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Focus Area Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
| User Selection | Prompt Focus | Key Checks |
|
||||
|----------------|--------------|------------|
|
||||
| General review | Comprehensive | Correctness, style, bugs, docs |
|
||||
| Security focus | Security-first | Injection, auth, validation, exposure |
|
||||
| Performance focus | Optimization | Complexity, memory, queries, caching |
|
||||
| Code quality | Maintainability | SOLID, duplication, naming, tests |
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
### No Changes to Review
|
||||
```
|
||||
No changes found for review target. Suggestions:
|
||||
- For --uncommitted: Make some code changes first
|
||||
- For --base: Ensure branch exists and has diverged
|
||||
- For --commit: Verify commit SHA exists
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Invalid Branch
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show available branches
|
||||
git branch -a --list | head -20
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Invalid Commit
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Show recent commits
|
||||
git log --oneline -10
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Uses `ccw cli --tool codex --mode review` endpoint
|
||||
- Model passed via prompt (codex uses `-c model=` internally)
|
||||
- Target flags (`--uncommitted`, `--base`, `--commit`) passed through to codex
|
||||
- Prompt follows standard ccw cli template format for consistency
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: Target flags and prompt are mutually exclusive**
|
||||
|
||||
The codex CLI has a constraint where target flags (`--uncommitted`, `--base`, `--commit`) cannot be used with a positional `[PROMPT]` argument:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
error: the argument '--uncommitted' cannot be used with '[PROMPT]'
|
||||
error: the argument '--base <BRANCH>' cannot be used with '[PROMPT]'
|
||||
error: the argument '--commit <SHA>' cannot be used with '[PROMPT]'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Behavior:**
|
||||
- When ANY target flag is specified, ccw cli automatically skips template concatenation (systemRules/roles)
|
||||
- The review uses codex's default review behavior for the specified target
|
||||
- Custom prompts are only supported WITHOUT target flags (reviews uncommitted changes by default)
|
||||
|
||||
**Valid combinations:**
|
||||
| Command | Result |
|
||||
|---------|--------|
|
||||
| `codex review "Focus on security"` | ✓ Custom prompt, reviews uncommitted (default) |
|
||||
| `codex review --uncommitted` | ✓ No prompt, uses default review |
|
||||
| `codex review --base main` | ✓ No prompt, uses default review |
|
||||
| `codex review --commit abc123` | ✓ No prompt, uses default review |
|
||||
| `codex review --uncommitted "prompt"` | ✗ Invalid - mutually exclusive |
|
||||
| `codex review --base main "prompt"` | ✗ Invalid - mutually exclusive |
|
||||
| `codex review --commit abc123 "prompt"` | ✗ Invalid - mutually exclusive |
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# ✓ Valid: prompt only (reviews uncommitted by default)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Focus on security" --tool codex --mode review
|
||||
|
||||
# ✓ Valid: target flag only (no prompt)
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --base main
|
||||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --commit abc123
|
||||
|
||||
# ✗ Invalid: target flag with prompt (will fail)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Review this" --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Review this" --tool codex --mode review --base main
|
||||
ccw cli -p "Review this" --tool codex --mode review --commit abc123
|
||||
```
|
||||
320
.claude/commands/cli/discuss-plan.md
Normal file
320
.claude/commands/cli/discuss-plan.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: discuss-plan
|
||||
description: Multi-round collaborative planning using Gemini, Codex, and Claude synthesis with iterative discussion cycles (read-only, no code changes)
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--topic '...'] [--task-id '...'] [--rounds N]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Discuss-Plan Command (/cli:discuss-plan)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Orchestrates a multi-model collaborative discussion for in-depth planning and problem analysis. This command facilitates an iterative dialogue between Gemini, Codex, and Claude (the orchestrating AI) to explore a topic from multiple perspectives, refine ideas, and build a robust plan.
|
||||
|
||||
**This command is for discussion and planning ONLY. It does NOT modify any code.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Workflow: The Discussion Loop
|
||||
|
||||
The command operates in iterative rounds, allowing the plan to evolve with each cycle. The user can choose to continue for more rounds or conclude when consensus is reached.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Topic Input → [Round 1: Gemini → Codex → Claude] → [User Review] →
|
||||
[Round 2: Gemini → Codex → Claude] → ... → Final Plan
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Model Roles & Priority
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority Order**: Gemini > Codex > Claude
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Gemini (The Analyst)** - Priority 1
|
||||
- Kicks off each round with deep analysis
|
||||
- Provides foundational ideas and draft plans
|
||||
- Analyzes current context or previous synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Codex (The Architect/Critic)** - Priority 2
|
||||
- Reviews Gemini's output critically
|
||||
- Uses deep reasoning for technical trade-offs
|
||||
- Proposes alternative strategies
|
||||
- **Participates purely in conversational/reasoning capacity**
|
||||
- Uses resume mechanism to maintain discussion context
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Claude (The Synthesizer/Moderator)** - Priority 3
|
||||
- Synthesizes discussion from Gemini and Codex
|
||||
- Highlights agreements and contentions
|
||||
- Structures refined plan
|
||||
- Poses key questions for next round
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `<input>` (Required): Topic description or task ID (e.g., "Design a new caching layer" or `PLAN-002`)
|
||||
- `--rounds <N>` (Optional): Maximum number of discussion rounds (default: prompts after each round)
|
||||
- `--task-id <id>` (Optional): Associates discussion with workflow task ID
|
||||
- `--topic <description>` (Optional): High-level topic for discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Initial Setup
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Input Processing**: Parse topic or task ID
|
||||
2. **Context Gathering**: Identify relevant files based on topic
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Discussion Round
|
||||
|
||||
Each round consists of three sequential steps, tracked via `TodoWrite`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Gemini's Analysis (Priority 1)**
|
||||
|
||||
Gemini analyzes the topic and proposes preliminary plan.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Round 1: CONTEXT_INPUT is the initial topic
|
||||
# Subsequent rounds: CONTEXT_INPUT is the synthesis from previous round
|
||||
gemini -p "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze and propose a plan for '[topic]'
|
||||
TASK: Provide initial analysis, identify key modules, and draft implementation plan
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md [auto-detected files]
|
||||
INPUT: [CONTEXT_INPUT]
|
||||
EXPECTED: Structured analysis and draft plan for discussion
|
||||
RULES: Focus on technical depth and practical considerations
|
||||
"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Codex's Critique (Priority 2)**
|
||||
|
||||
Codex reviews Gemini's output using conversational reasoning. Uses `resume --last` to maintain context across rounds.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# First round (new session)
|
||||
codex --full-auto exec "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Critically review technical plan
|
||||
TASK: Review the provided plan, identify weaknesses, suggest alternatives, reason about trade-offs
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md [relevant files]
|
||||
INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis]
|
||||
EXPECTED: Critical review with alternative ideas and risk analysis
|
||||
RULES: Focus on architectural soundness and implementation feasibility
|
||||
" --skip-git-repo-check
|
||||
|
||||
# Subsequent rounds (resume discussion)
|
||||
codex --full-auto exec "
|
||||
PURPOSE: Re-evaluate plan based on latest synthesis
|
||||
TASK: Review updated plan and discussion points, provide further critique or refined ideas
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: Previous discussion context (maintained via resume)
|
||||
INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis for current round]
|
||||
EXPECTED: Updated critique building on previous discussion
|
||||
RULES: Build on previous insights, avoid repeating points
|
||||
" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)**
|
||||
|
||||
Claude (orchestrating AI) synthesizes both outputs:
|
||||
|
||||
- Summarizes Gemini's proposal and Codex's critique
|
||||
- Highlights agreements and disagreements
|
||||
- Structures consolidated plan
|
||||
- Presents open questions for next round
|
||||
- This synthesis becomes input for next round
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: User Review and Iteration
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Present Synthesis**: Show synthesized plan and key discussion points
|
||||
2. **Continue or Conclude**: Use AskUserQuestion to prompt user:
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Round of discussion complete. What is the next step?",
|
||||
header: "Next Round",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Start another round", description: "Continue the discussion to refine the plan further." },
|
||||
{ label: "Conclude and finalize", description: "End the discussion and save the final plan." }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Loop or Finalize**:
|
||||
- Continue → New round with Gemini analyzing latest synthesis
|
||||
- Conclude → Save final synthesized document
|
||||
|
||||
## TodoWrite Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
Progress tracked for each round and model.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Example for 2-round discussion
|
||||
TodoWrite({
|
||||
todos: [
|
||||
// Round 1
|
||||
{ content: "[Round 1] Gemini: Analyzing topic", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing with Gemini" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Round 1] Codex: Critiquing plan", status: "completed", activeForm: "Critiquing with Codex" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Round 1] Claude: Synthesizing discussion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Synthesizing discussion" },
|
||||
{ content: "[User Action] Review Round 1 and decide next step", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Awaiting user decision" },
|
||||
|
||||
// Round 2
|
||||
{ content: "[Round 2] Gemini: Analyzing refined plan", status: "pending", activeForm: "Analyzing refined plan" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Round 2] Codex: Re-evaluating plan [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Re-evaluating with Codex" },
|
||||
{ content: "[Round 2] Claude: Finalizing plan", status: "pending", activeForm: "Finalizing plan" },
|
||||
{ content: "Discussion complete - Final plan generated", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating final document" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Routing
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Log**: Entire multi-round discussion logged to single file:
|
||||
- `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/discuss-plan-[topic]-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
- **Final Plan**: Clean final version saved upon conclusion:
|
||||
- `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/plan-[topic].md`
|
||||
- **Scratchpad**: If no session active:
|
||||
- `.workflow/.scratchpad/discuss-plan-[topic]-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Discussion Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Each round's output is structured as:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Round N: [Topic]
|
||||
|
||||
### Gemini's Analysis (Priority 1)
|
||||
[Gemini's full analysis and proposal]
|
||||
|
||||
### Codex's Critique (Priority 2)
|
||||
[Codex's critical review and alternatives]
|
||||
|
||||
### Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)
|
||||
**Points of Agreement:**
|
||||
- [Agreement 1]
|
||||
- [Agreement 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Points of Contention:**
|
||||
- [Issue 1]: Gemini suggests X, Codex suggests Y
|
||||
- [Issue 2]: Trade-off between A and B
|
||||
|
||||
**Consolidated Plan:**
|
||||
[Structured plan incorporating both perspectives]
|
||||
|
||||
**Open Questions for Next Round:**
|
||||
1. [Question 1]
|
||||
2. [Question 2]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 1: Multi-Round Architecture Discussion
|
||||
|
||||
**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Design a real-time notification system"`
|
||||
|
||||
**Round 1**:
|
||||
1. **Gemini**: Proposes WebSocket-based architecture with RabbitMQ message queue
|
||||
2. **Codex**: Critiques as overly complex for MVP. Suggests Server-Sent Events (SSE) for simplicity (one-way notifications). Questions RabbitMQ necessity, proposes simpler Redis Pub/Sub
|
||||
3. **Claude**: Synthesizes views:
|
||||
- **Plan A (Gemini)**: WebSockets + RabbitMQ (highly scalable, complex)
|
||||
- **Plan B (Codex)**: SSE + Redis (simpler, less overhead)
|
||||
- **Open Question**: Is bi-directional communication critical, or is simplicity priority?
|
||||
4. **User Action**: Opts for another round to explore trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
**Round 2**:
|
||||
1. **Gemini**: Analyzes synthesized document. Notes that if features like "user is typing" indicators are roadmapped, WebSockets better long-term. Drafts plan starting with SSE/Redis but designing for easy migration
|
||||
2. **Codex**: Reviews migration plan. Reasons that migration itself could be complex. If feature set likely to expand, starting with WebSockets using managed service might be best cost/benefit
|
||||
3. **Claude**: Synthesizes new discussion:
|
||||
- **Consensus**: Simple SSE/Redis too short-sighted
|
||||
- **Refined Options**:
|
||||
1. Phased approach (SSE → WebSocket) with clear migration plan
|
||||
2. Direct WebSocket with managed service (Pusher, Ably) to reduce ops overhead
|
||||
- **Recommendation**: Option 2 most robust and future-proof
|
||||
4. **User Action**: Agrees with recommendation, concludes discussion
|
||||
|
||||
**Final Output**: Planning document saved with:
|
||||
- Chosen architecture (Managed WebSocket service)
|
||||
- Multi-round reasoning
|
||||
- High-level implementation steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 2: Feature Design Discussion
|
||||
|
||||
**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Design user permission system" --rounds 2`
|
||||
|
||||
**Round 1**:
|
||||
1. **Gemini**: Proposes RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) with predefined roles
|
||||
2. **Codex**: Suggests ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) for more flexibility
|
||||
3. **Claude**: Synthesizes trade-offs between simplicity (RBAC) vs flexibility (ABAC)
|
||||
|
||||
**Round 2**:
|
||||
1. **Gemini**: Analyzes hybrid approach - RBAC for core permissions, attributes for fine-grained control
|
||||
2. **Codex**: Reviews hybrid model, identifies implementation challenges
|
||||
3. **Claude**: Final plan with phased rollout strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Automatic Conclusion**: Command concludes after 2 rounds as specified
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 3: Problem-Solving Discussion
|
||||
|
||||
**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Debug memory leak in data pipeline" --task-id ISSUE-042`
|
||||
|
||||
**Round 1**:
|
||||
1. **Gemini**: Identifies potential leak sources (unclosed handles, growing cache, event listeners)
|
||||
2. **Codex**: Adds profiling tool recommendations, suggests memory monitoring
|
||||
3. **Claude**: Structures debugging plan with phased approach
|
||||
|
||||
**User Decision**: Single round sufficient, concludes with debugging strategy
|
||||
|
||||
## Consensus Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Continue:**
|
||||
- Significant disagreement between models
|
||||
- Open questions requiring deeper analysis
|
||||
- Trade-offs need more exploration
|
||||
- User wants additional perspectives
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Conclude:**
|
||||
- Models converge on solution
|
||||
- All key questions addressed
|
||||
- User satisfied with plan depth
|
||||
- Maximum rounds reached (if specified)
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison with Other Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Models | Rounds | Discussion | Implementation | Use Case |
|
||||
|---------|--------|--------|------------|----------------|----------|
|
||||
| `/cli:mode:plan` | Gemini | 1 | NO | NO | Single-model planning |
|
||||
| `/cli:analyze` | Gemini/Qwen | 1 | NO | NO | Code analysis |
|
||||
| `/cli:execute` | Any | 1 | NO | YES | Direct implementation |
|
||||
| `/cli:codex-execute` | Codex | 1 | NO | YES | Multi-stage implementation |
|
||||
| `/cli:discuss-plan` | **Gemini+Codex+Claude** | **Multiple** | **YES** | **NO** | **Multi-perspective planning** |
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Use for Complex Decisions**: Ideal for architectural decisions, design trade-offs, problem-solving
|
||||
2. **Start with Broad Topic**: Let first round establish scope, subsequent rounds refine
|
||||
3. **Review Each Synthesis**: Claude's synthesis is key decision point - review carefully
|
||||
4. **Know When to Stop**: Don't over-iterate - 2-3 rounds usually sufficient
|
||||
5. **Task Association**: Use `--task-id` for traceability in workflow
|
||||
6. **Save Intermediate Results**: Each round's synthesis saved automatically
|
||||
7. **Let Models Disagree**: Divergent views often reveal important trade-offs
|
||||
8. **Focus Questions**: Use Claude's open questions to guide next round
|
||||
|
||||
## Breaking Discussion Loops
|
||||
|
||||
**Detecting Loops:**
|
||||
- Models repeating same arguments
|
||||
- No new insights emerging
|
||||
- Trade-offs well understood
|
||||
|
||||
**Breaking Strategies:**
|
||||
1. **User Decision**: Make executive decision when enough info gathered
|
||||
2. **Timeboxing**: Set max rounds upfront with `--rounds`
|
||||
3. **Criteria-Based**: Define decision criteria before starting
|
||||
4. **Hybrid Approach**: Accept multiple valid solutions in final plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Pure Discussion**: This command NEVER modifies code - only produces planning documents
|
||||
- **Codex Role**: Codex participates as reasoning/critique tool, not executor
|
||||
- **Resume Context**: Codex maintains discussion context via `resume --last`
|
||||
- **Priority System**: Ensures Gemini leads analysis, Codex provides critique, Claude synthesizes
|
||||
- **Output Quality**: Multi-perspective discussion produces more robust plans than single-model analysis
|
||||
- Command patterns and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
|
||||
- For implementation after discussion, use `/cli:execute` or `/cli:codex-execute` separately
|
||||
202
.claude/commands/cli/execute.md
Normal file
202
.claude/commands/cli/execute.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: execute
|
||||
description: Autonomous code implementation with YOLO auto-approval using Gemini/Qwen/Codex, supports task ID or description input with automatic file pattern detection
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations). **MODIFIES CODE**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Intent**: Autonomous code implementation, modification, and generation
|
||||
**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
|
||||
**Key Feature**: Automatic context inference and file pattern detection
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Modification**: This command MODIFIES, CREATES, and DELETES code files
|
||||
2. **Auto-Approval**: YOLO mode bypasses confirmation prompts for all operations
|
||||
3. **Implementation Focus**: Executes actual code changes, not just recommendations
|
||||
4. **Requires Explicit Intent**: Use only when implementation is intended
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
### YOLO Permissions
|
||||
Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
|
||||
|
||||
**WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Modes
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Description Mode** (supports `--enhance`):
|
||||
- Input: Natural language description
|
||||
- Process: [Optional: Enhance] → Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Execute
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Task ID Mode** (no `--enhance`):
|
||||
- Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
|
||||
- Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Agent Mode** (default):
|
||||
- Input: Description or task-id
|
||||
- Process: 5-Phase Workflow → Context Discovery → Optimal Tool Selection → Execute
|
||||
|
||||
### Context Inference
|
||||
|
||||
Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology (each @ references one pattern):
|
||||
- "auth" → `@**/*auth* @**/*user*`
|
||||
- "React" → `@src/**/*.jsx @src/**/*.tsx`
|
||||
- "api" → `@**/api/**/* @**/routes/**/*`
|
||||
- Always includes: `@CLAUDE.md @**/*CLAUDE.md`
|
||||
|
||||
For precise file targeting, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first.
|
||||
|
||||
### Codex Session Continuity
|
||||
|
||||
**Resume Pattern** for related tasks:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# First task - establish session
|
||||
codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "[task]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
|
||||
# Related task - continue session
|
||||
codex --full-auto exec "[related-task]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See intelligent-tools-strategy.md for auto-resume rules.
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: auto-select by agent based on complexity)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
|
||||
- `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
|
||||
- `--debug` - Verbose logging
|
||||
- `--save-session` - Save execution to workflow session
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow Integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Management**: Auto-detects active session from `.workflow/active/` directory
|
||||
- Active session: Save to `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
|
||||
- No session: Create new session or save to scratchpad
|
||||
|
||||
**Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated implementation:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Autonomous code implementation with YOLO auto-approval",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${description_or_task_id}
|
||||
Mode: execute
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
Task-ID: ${task_id}
|
||||
|
||||
Execute autonomous code implementation with full modification permissions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Task Analysis:
|
||||
${task_id ? '- Load task spec from .task/' + task_id + '.json' : ''}
|
||||
- Parse requirements and implementation scope
|
||||
- Classify complexity (simple/medium/complex)
|
||||
- Extract keywords for context discovery
|
||||
|
||||
2. Context Discovery:
|
||||
- Discover implementation files using MCP/ripgrep
|
||||
- Identify existing patterns and conventions (CLAUDE.md)
|
||||
- Map dependencies and integration points
|
||||
- Gather related tests and documentation
|
||||
- Auto-detect file patterns from keywords
|
||||
|
||||
3. Tool Selection & Execution:
|
||||
- Complexity assessment:
|
||||
* Simple/Medium → Gemini/Qwen (MODE=write, --approval-mode yolo)
|
||||
* Complex → Codex (MODE=auto, --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
|
||||
- Tool preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select based on complexity'}
|
||||
- Apply appropriate implementation template
|
||||
- Execute with YOLO auto-approval (bypasses all confirmations)
|
||||
|
||||
4. Implementation:
|
||||
- Modify/create/delete code files per requirements
|
||||
- Follow existing code patterns and conventions
|
||||
- Include comprehensive context in CLI command
|
||||
- Ensure working implementation with proper error handling
|
||||
|
||||
5. Output & Documentation:
|
||||
- Save execution log: .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md
|
||||
${task_id ? '- Generate task summary: .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/' + task_id + '-summary.md' : ''}
|
||||
${task_id ? '- Update task status in .task/' + task_id + '.json' : ''}
|
||||
- Document all code changes made
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ YOLO Mode: All file operations auto-approved without confirmation
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md` + `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
**Basic Implementation** (modifies code):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
|
||||
# Agent Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=medium, keywords=['jwt', 'auth', 'middleware']
|
||||
# Agent Phase 2: Discovers auth patterns, existing middleware structure
|
||||
# Agent Phase 3: Selects Gemini (medium complexity)
|
||||
# Agent Phase 4: Executes with auto-approval
|
||||
# Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Complex Implementation** (modifies code):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:execute "implement OAuth2 authentication with token refresh"
|
||||
# Agent Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=complex, keywords=['oauth2', 'auth', 'token', 'refresh']
|
||||
# Agent Phase 2: MCP discovers auth patterns, existing middleware, JWT dependencies
|
||||
# Agent Phase 3: Enhances prompt with discovered patterns and best practices
|
||||
# Agent Phase 4: Selects Codex (complex task), executes with comprehensive context
|
||||
# Agent Phase 5: Saves execution log + generates implementation summary
|
||||
# Result: Complete OAuth2 implementation + detailed execution log
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhanced Implementation** (modifies code):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
|
||||
# Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
|
||||
# Step 2: Execute implementation with auto-approval
|
||||
# Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Task Execution** (modifies code):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:execute IMPL-001
|
||||
# Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
|
||||
# Executes: Implementation based on task spec
|
||||
# Result: Code changes per task definition
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex Implementation** (modifies code):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
|
||||
# Executes: Codex with full file access
|
||||
# Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen Code Generation** (modifies code):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
|
||||
# Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
|
||||
# Step 2: Execute with MODE=write
|
||||
# Result: REFACTORED auth code with structural changes
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison with Analysis Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
|
||||
|---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
|
||||
| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | NO | N/A |
|
||||
| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | NO | N/A |
|
||||
| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | **YES** | **YES** |
|
||||
96
.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-diagnosis.md
Normal file
96
.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-diagnosis.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bug-diagnosis
|
||||
description: Read-only bug root cause analysis using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with systematic diagnosis template for fix suggestions
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Mode: Bug Diagnosis (/cli:mode:bug-diagnosis)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Systematic bug diagnosis with root cause analysis template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`).
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Selection**:
|
||||
- **gemini** (default) - Best for bug diagnosis
|
||||
- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
|
||||
- **codex** - Alternative for complex bug analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt`
|
||||
- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused diagnosis
|
||||
- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error details
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini** (Primary):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Uses gemini by default, or specify explicitly
|
||||
--tool gemini
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen** (Fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool qwen
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex** (Alternative):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool codex
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated bug diagnosis:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Bug root cause diagnosis with fix suggestions",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${bug_description}
|
||||
Mode: bug-diagnosis
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
|
||||
Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
|
||||
|
||||
Execute systematic bug diagnosis and root cause analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Context Discovery:
|
||||
- Locate error traces, stack traces, and log messages
|
||||
- Find related code sections and affected modules
|
||||
- Identify data flow paths leading to the bug
|
||||
- Discover test cases related to bug area
|
||||
- Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive context gathering
|
||||
|
||||
2. Root Cause Analysis:
|
||||
- Apply diagnostic template methodology
|
||||
- Trace execution to identify failure point
|
||||
- Analyze state, data, and logic causing issue
|
||||
- Document potential root causes with evidence
|
||||
- Assess bug severity and impact scope
|
||||
|
||||
3. CLI Command Construction:
|
||||
- Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex bugs)
|
||||
- Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
|
||||
- Context: @**/* + error traces + affected code
|
||||
- Mode: analysis (read-only)
|
||||
- Template: analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
|
||||
|
||||
4. Output Generation:
|
||||
- Root cause diagnosis with evidence
|
||||
- Fix suggestions and recommendations
|
||||
- Prevention strategies
|
||||
- Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-diagnosis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Read-only**: Diagnoses bugs, does NOT modify code
|
||||
- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`
|
||||
- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-diagnosis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
98
.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md
Normal file
98
.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: code-analysis
|
||||
description: Read-only execution path tracing using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with specialized analysis template for call flow and optimization
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt`).
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Selection**:
|
||||
- **gemini** (default) - Best for code analysis and tracing
|
||||
- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
|
||||
- **codex** - Alternative for complex analysis tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
|
||||
- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
|
||||
- `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini** (Primary):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool gemini "trace auth flow"
|
||||
# OR (default)
|
||||
/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace auth flow"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen** (Fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen "trace auth flow"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex** (Alternative):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex "trace auth flow"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated code analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Execution path tracing and call flow analysis",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${analysis_target}
|
||||
Mode: code-analysis
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
|
||||
Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt
|
||||
|
||||
Execute systematic code analysis with execution path tracing:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Context Discovery:
|
||||
- Identify entry points and function signatures
|
||||
- Trace call chains and execution flows
|
||||
- Discover related files (implementations, dependencies, tests)
|
||||
- Map data flow and state transformations
|
||||
- Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive file discovery
|
||||
|
||||
2. Analysis Execution:
|
||||
- Apply execution tracing template
|
||||
- Generate call flow diagrams (textual)
|
||||
- Document execution paths and branching logic
|
||||
- Identify optimization opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
3. CLI Command Construction:
|
||||
- Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex analysis)
|
||||
- Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
|
||||
- Context: @**/* + discovered execution context
|
||||
- Mode: analysis (read-only)
|
||||
- Template: analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt
|
||||
|
||||
4. Output Generation:
|
||||
- Execution trace documentation
|
||||
- Call flow analysis with diagrams
|
||||
- Performance and optimization insights
|
||||
- Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Read-only**: Analyzes code, does NOT modify files
|
||||
- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt`
|
||||
- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
126
.claude/commands/cli/mode/document-analysis.md
Normal file
126
.claude/commands/cli/mode/document-analysis.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: document-analysis
|
||||
description: Read-only technical document/paper analysis using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with systematic comprehension template for insights extraction
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] document path or topic"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*), Read(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Mode: Document Analysis (/cli:mode:document-analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Systematic analysis of technical documents, research papers, API documentation, and technical specifications.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Selection**:
|
||||
- **gemini** (default) - Best for document comprehension and structure analysis
|
||||
- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
|
||||
- **codex** - Alternative for complex technical documents
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped document discovery
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt`
|
||||
- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for document search
|
||||
- `<document-path-or-topic>` (Required) - File path or topic description
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini** (Primary):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:mode:document-analysis "README.md"
|
||||
/cli:mode:document-analysis --tool gemini "analyze API documentation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen** (Fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:mode:document-analysis --tool qwen "docs/architecture.md"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex** (Alternative):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/cli:mode:document-analysis --tool codex "research paper in docs/"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** for automated document analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Systematic document comprehension and insights extraction",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${document_path_or_topic}
|
||||
Mode: document-analysis
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
|
||||
Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-technical-document.txt
|
||||
|
||||
Execute systematic document analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Document Discovery:
|
||||
- Locate target document(s) via path or topic keywords
|
||||
- Identify document type (README, API docs, research paper, spec, tutorial)
|
||||
- Detect document format (Markdown, PDF, plain text, reStructuredText)
|
||||
- Discover related documents (references, appendices, examples)
|
||||
- Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive file discovery
|
||||
|
||||
2. Pre-Analysis Planning (Required):
|
||||
- Determine document structure (sections, hierarchy, flow)
|
||||
- Identify key components (abstract, methodology, implementation details)
|
||||
- Map dependencies and cross-references
|
||||
- Assess document scope and complexity
|
||||
- Plan analysis approach based on document type
|
||||
|
||||
3. CLI Command Construction:
|
||||
- Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex docs)
|
||||
- Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
|
||||
- Context: @{document_paths} + @CLAUDE.md + related files
|
||||
- Mode: analysis (read-only)
|
||||
- Template: analysis/02-analyze-technical-document.txt
|
||||
|
||||
4. Analysis Execution:
|
||||
- Apply 6-field template structure (PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES)
|
||||
- Execute multi-phase analysis protocol with pre-planning
|
||||
- Perform self-critique before final output
|
||||
- Generate structured report with evidence-based insights
|
||||
|
||||
5. Output Generation:
|
||||
- Comprehensive document analysis report
|
||||
- Structured insights with section references
|
||||
- Critical assessment with evidence
|
||||
- Actionable recommendations
|
||||
- Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/doc-analysis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Read-only**: Analyzes documents, does NOT modify files
|
||||
- **Evidence-based**: All claims must reference specific sections/pages
|
||||
- **Pre-planning**: Requires analysis approach planning before execution
|
||||
- **Precise language**: Direct, accurate wording - no persuasive embellishment
|
||||
- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/doc-analysis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Types Supported
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Focus Areas | Key Outputs |
|
||||
|------|-------------|-------------|
|
||||
| README | Purpose, setup, usage | Integration steps, quick-start guide |
|
||||
| API Documentation | Endpoints, parameters, responses | API usage patterns, integration points |
|
||||
| Research Paper | Methodology, findings, validity | Applicable techniques, implementation feasibility |
|
||||
| Specification | Requirements, standards, constraints | Compliance checklist, implementation requirements |
|
||||
| Tutorial | Learning path, examples, exercises | Key concepts, practical applications |
|
||||
| Architecture Docs | System design, components, patterns | Design decisions, integration points, trade-offs |
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Scope Definition**: Clearly define what aspects to analyze before starting
|
||||
2. **Layered Reading**: Structure/Overview → Details → Critical Analysis → Synthesis
|
||||
3. **Evidence Trail**: Track section references for all extracted information
|
||||
4. **Gap Identification**: Note missing information or unclear sections explicitly
|
||||
5. **Actionable Output**: Focus on insights that inform decisions or actions
|
||||
93
.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md
Normal file
93
.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: plan
|
||||
description: Read-only architecture planning using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with strategic planning template for modification plans and impact analysis
|
||||
argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
|
||||
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Strategic software architecture planning template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt`).
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Selection**:
|
||||
- **gemini** (default) - Best for architecture planning
|
||||
- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
|
||||
- **codex** - Alternative for implementation planning
|
||||
|
||||
## Parameters
|
||||
|
||||
- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
|
||||
- `--enhance` - Enhance task with `/enhance-prompt`
|
||||
- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
|
||||
- `<planning-task>` (Required) - Architecture planning task or modification requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini** (Primary):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool gemini # or omit (default)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Qwen** (Fallback):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool qwen
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Codex** (Alternative):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
--tool codex
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated planning:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
|
||||
description="Architecture planning with impact analysis",
|
||||
prompt=`
|
||||
Task: ${planning_task}
|
||||
Mode: plan
|
||||
Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
|
||||
Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
|
||||
Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
|
||||
Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt
|
||||
|
||||
Execute strategic architecture planning:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Context Discovery:
|
||||
- Analyze current architecture structure
|
||||
- Identify affected components and modules
|
||||
- Map dependencies and integration points
|
||||
- Assess modification impacts (scope, complexity, risks)
|
||||
|
||||
2. Planning Analysis:
|
||||
- Apply strategic planning template
|
||||
- Generate modification plan with phases
|
||||
- Document architectural decisions and rationale
|
||||
- Identify potential conflicts and mitigation strategies
|
||||
|
||||
3. CLI Command Construction:
|
||||
- Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for implementation guidance)
|
||||
- Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
|
||||
- Context: @**/* (full architecture context)
|
||||
- Mode: analysis (read-only, no code generation)
|
||||
- Template: planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt
|
||||
|
||||
4. Output Generation:
|
||||
- Strategic modification plan
|
||||
- Impact analysis and risk assessment
|
||||
- Implementation roadmap
|
||||
- Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
|
||||
`
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- **Read-only**: Creates modification plans, does NOT generate code
|
||||
- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt`
|
||||
- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
|
||||
@@ -1,513 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: codex-coordinator
|
||||
description: Command orchestration tool for Codex - analyze requirements, recommend command chain, execute sequentially with state persistence
|
||||
argument-hint: "TASK=\"<task description>\" [--depth=standard|deep] [--auto-confirm] [--verbose]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Codex Coordinator Command
|
||||
|
||||
Interactive orchestration tool for Codex commands: analyze task → discover commands → recommend chain → execute sequentially → track state.
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Model**: Intelligent agent-driven workflow. Claude analyzes each phase and orchestrates command execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Concept: Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
|
||||
|
||||
### What is a Minimum Execution Unit?
|
||||
|
||||
**Definition**: A set of commands that must execute together as an atomic group to achieve a meaningful workflow milestone. Splitting these commands breaks the logical flow and creates incomplete states.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why This Matters**:
|
||||
- **Prevents Incomplete States**: Avoid stopping after task generation without execution
|
||||
- **User Experience**: User gets complete results, not intermediate artifacts requiring manual follow-up
|
||||
- **Workflow Integrity**: Maintains logical coherence of multi-step operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Codex Minimum Execution Units
|
||||
|
||||
**Planning + Execution Units** (规划+执行单元):
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| **Quick Implementation** | lite-plan-a → execute | Lightweight plan and immediate execution | Working code |
|
||||
| **Bug Fix** | lite-fix → execute | Quick bug diagnosis and fix execution | Fixed code |
|
||||
| **Issue Workflow** | issue-discover → issue-plan → issue-queue → issue-execute | Complete issue lifecycle | Completed issues |
|
||||
| **Discovery & Analysis** | issue-discover → issue-discover-by-prompt | Issue discovery with multiple perspectives | Generated issues |
|
||||
| **Brainstorm to Execution** | brainstorm-with-file → execute | Brainstorm ideas then implement | Working code |
|
||||
|
||||
**With-File Workflows** (文档化单元):
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose | Output |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| **Brainstorm With File** | brainstorm-with-file | Multi-perspective ideation with documentation | brainstorm.md |
|
||||
| **Debug With File** | debug-with-file | Hypothesis-driven debugging with documentation | understanding.md |
|
||||
| **Analyze With File** | analyze-with-file | Collaborative analysis with documentation | discussion.md |
|
||||
| **Clean & Analyze** | clean → analyze-with-file | Cleanup then analyze | Cleaned code + analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
### Command-to-Unit Mapping (命令与最小单元的映射)
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Precedes | Atomic Units |
|
||||
|---------|----------|--------------|
|
||||
| lite-plan-a | execute, brainstorm-with-file | Quick Implementation |
|
||||
| lite-fix | execute | Bug Fix |
|
||||
| issue-discover | issue-plan | Issue Workflow |
|
||||
| issue-plan | issue-queue | Issue Workflow |
|
||||
| issue-queue | issue-execute | Issue Workflow |
|
||||
| brainstorm-with-file | execute, issue-execute | Brainstorm to Execution |
|
||||
| debug-with-file | execute | Debug With File |
|
||||
| analyze-with-file | (standalone) | Analyze With File |
|
||||
| clean | analyze-with-file, execute | Clean & Analyze |
|
||||
| quick-plan-with-file | execute | Quick Planning with File |
|
||||
| merge-plans-with-file | execute | Merge Multiple Plans |
|
||||
| unified-execute-with-file | (terminal) | Execute with File Tracking |
|
||||
|
||||
### Atomic Group Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Never Split Units**: Coordinator must recommend complete units, not partial chains
|
||||
2. **Multi-Unit Participation**: Some commands can participate in multiple units
|
||||
3. **User Override**: User can explicitly request partial execution (advanced mode)
|
||||
4. **Visualization**: Pipeline view shows unit boundaries with 【 】markers
|
||||
5. **Validation**: Before execution, verify all unit commands are included
|
||||
|
||||
**Example Pipeline with Units**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
需求 → 【lite-plan-a → execute】→ 代码 → 【issue-discover → issue-plan → issue-queue → issue-execute】→ 完成
|
||||
└──── Quick Implementation ────┘ └────────── Issue Workflow ─────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 3-Phase Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Analyze Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Parse task to extract: goal, scope, complexity, and task type.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function analyzeRequirements(taskDescription) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
goal: extractMainGoal(taskDescription), // e.g., "Fix login bug"
|
||||
scope: extractScope(taskDescription), // e.g., ["auth", "login"]
|
||||
complexity: determineComplexity(taskDescription), // 'simple' | 'medium' | 'complex'
|
||||
task_type: detectTaskType(taskDescription) // See task type patterns below
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Task Type Detection Patterns
|
||||
function detectTaskType(text) {
|
||||
// Priority order (first match wins)
|
||||
if (/fix|bug|error|crash|fail|debug|diagnose/.test(text)) return 'bugfix';
|
||||
if (/生成|generate|discover|找出|issue|问题/.test(text)) return 'discovery';
|
||||
if (/plan|规划|设计|design|analyze|分析/.test(text)) return 'analysis';
|
||||
if (/清理|cleanup|clean|refactor|重构/.test(text)) return 'cleanup';
|
||||
if (/头脑|brainstorm|创意|ideation/.test(text)) return 'brainstorm';
|
||||
if (/合并|merge|combine|batch/.test(text)) return 'batch-planning';
|
||||
return 'feature'; // Default
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Complexity Assessment
|
||||
function determineComplexity(text) {
|
||||
let score = 0;
|
||||
if (/refactor|重构|migrate|迁移|architect|架构|system|系统/.test(text)) score += 2;
|
||||
if (/multiple|多个|across|跨|all|所有|entire|整个/.test(text)) score += 2;
|
||||
if (/integrate|集成|api|database|数据库/.test(text)) score += 1;
|
||||
if (/security|安全|performance|性能|scale|扩展/.test(text)) score += 1;
|
||||
return score >= 4 ? 'complex' : score >= 2 ? 'medium' : 'simple';
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Display to user**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Analysis Complete:
|
||||
Goal: [extracted goal]
|
||||
Scope: [identified areas]
|
||||
Complexity: [level]
|
||||
Task Type: [detected type]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Discover Commands & Recommend Chain
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic command chain assembly using task type and complexity matching.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Available Codex Commands (Discovery)
|
||||
|
||||
All commands from `~/.codex/prompts/`:
|
||||
- **Planning**: @~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md, @~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-b.md, @~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-c.md, @~/.codex/prompts/quick-plan-with-file.md, @~/.codex/prompts/merge-plans-with-file.md
|
||||
- **Execution**: @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md, @~/.codex/prompts/unified-execute-with-file.md
|
||||
- **Bug Fixes**: @~/.codex/prompts/lite-fix.md, @~/.codex/prompts/debug-with-file.md
|
||||
- **Discovery**: @~/.codex/prompts/issue-discover.md, @~/.codex/prompts/issue-discover-by-prompt.md, @~/.codex/prompts/issue-plan.md, @~/.codex/prompts/issue-queue.md, @~/.codex/prompts/issue-execute.md
|
||||
- **Analysis**: @~/.codex/prompts/analyze-with-file.md
|
||||
- **Brainstorming**: @~/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md, @~/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-to-cycle.md
|
||||
- **Cleanup**: @~/.codex/prompts/clean.md, @~/.codex/prompts/compact.md
|
||||
|
||||
#### Recommendation Algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function recommendCommandChain(analysis) {
|
||||
// Step 1: 根据任务类型确定流程
|
||||
const { inputPort, outputPort } = determinePortFlow(analysis.task_type, analysis.complexity);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Claude 根据命令特性和任务特征，智能选择命令序列
|
||||
const chain = selectChainByTaskType(analysis);
|
||||
|
||||
return chain;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 任务类型对应的端口流
|
||||
function determinePortFlow(taskType, complexity) {
|
||||
const flows = {
|
||||
'bugfix': { flow: ['lite-fix', 'execute'], depth: complexity === 'complex' ? 'deep' : 'standard' },
|
||||
'discovery': { flow: ['issue-discover', 'issue-plan', 'issue-queue', 'issue-execute'], depth: 'standard' },
|
||||
'analysis': { flow: ['analyze-with-file'], depth: complexity === 'complex' ? 'deep' : 'standard' },
|
||||
'cleanup': { flow: ['clean'], depth: 'standard' },
|
||||
'brainstorm': { flow: ['brainstorm-with-file', 'execute'], depth: complexity === 'complex' ? 'deep' : 'standard' },
|
||||
'batch-planning': { flow: ['merge-plans-with-file', 'execute'], depth: 'standard' },
|
||||
'feature': { flow: complexity === 'complex' ? ['lite-plan-b'] : ['lite-plan-a', 'execute'], depth: complexity === 'complex' ? 'deep' : 'standard' }
|
||||
};
|
||||
return flows[taskType] || flows['feature'];
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Display to User
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Recommended Command Chain:
|
||||
|
||||
Pipeline (管道视图):
|
||||
需求 → @~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md → 计划 → @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md → 代码完成
|
||||
|
||||
Commands (命令列表):
|
||||
1. @~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md
|
||||
2. @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md
|
||||
|
||||
Proceed? [Confirm / Show Details / Adjust / Cancel]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2b: Get User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Ask user for confirmation before proceeding with execution.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function getUserConfirmation(chain) {
|
||||
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: 'Proceed with this command chain?',
|
||||
header: 'Confirm Chain',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Confirm and execute', description: 'Proceed with commands' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Show details', description: 'View each command' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Adjust chain', description: 'Remove or reorder' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Cancel', description: 'Abort' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return response;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Execute Sequential Command Chain
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function executeCommandChain(chain, analysis) {
|
||||
const sessionId = `codex-coord-${Date.now()}`;
|
||||
const stateDir = `.workflow/.codex-coordinator/${sessionId}`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Create state directory
|
||||
const state = {
|
||||
session_id: sessionId,
|
||||
status: 'running',
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
analysis: analysis,
|
||||
command_chain: chain.map((cmd, idx) => ({ ...cmd, index: idx, status: 'pending' })),
|
||||
execution_results: [],
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Save initial state
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < chain.length; i++) {
|
||||
const cmd = chain[i];
|
||||
console.log(`[${i+1}/${chain.length}] Executing: @~/.codex/prompts/${cmd.name}.md`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Update status to running
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'running';
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Build command with parameters using full path
|
||||
let commandStr = `@~/.codex/prompts/${cmd.name}.md`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Add parameters based on previous results and task context
|
||||
if (i > 0 && state.execution_results.length > 0) {
|
||||
const lastResult = state.execution_results[state.execution_results.length - 1];
|
||||
commandStr += ` --resume="${lastResult.session_id || lastResult.artifact}"`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// For analysis-based commands, add depth parameter
|
||||
if (analysis.complexity === 'complex' && (cmd.name.includes('analyze') || cmd.name.includes('plan'))) {
|
||||
commandStr += ` --depth=deep`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add task description for planning commands
|
||||
if (cmd.type === 'planning' && i === 0) {
|
||||
commandStr += ` TASK="${analysis.goal}"`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Execute command via Bash (spawning as background task)
|
||||
// Format: @~/.codex/prompts/command-name.md [] parameters
|
||||
// Note: This simulates the execution; actual implementation uses hook callbacks
|
||||
console.log(`Executing: ${commandStr}`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Save execution record
|
||||
state.execution_results.push({
|
||||
index: i,
|
||||
command: cmd.name,
|
||||
status: 'in-progress',
|
||||
started_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
session_id: null,
|
||||
artifact: null
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'completed';
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`[${i+1}/${chain.length}] ✓ Completed: @~/.codex/prompts/${cmd.name}.md`);
|
||||
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
state.command_chain[i].status = 'failed';
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`❌ Command failed: ${error.message}`);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state.status = 'completed';
|
||||
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
|
||||
Write(`${stateDir}/state.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`\n✅ Orchestration Complete: ${state.session_id}`);
|
||||
return state;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## State File Structure
|
||||
|
||||
**Location**: `.workflow/.codex-coordinator/{session_id}/state.json`
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "codex-coord-20250129-143025",
|
||||
"status": "running|waiting|completed|failed",
|
||||
"created_at": "2025-01-29T14:30:25Z",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2025-01-29T14:35:45Z",
|
||||
"analysis": {
|
||||
"goal": "Fix login authentication bug",
|
||||
"scope": ["auth", "login"],
|
||||
"complexity": "medium",
|
||||
"task_type": "bugfix"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"command_chain": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 0,
|
||||
"name": "lite-fix",
|
||||
"type": "bugfix",
|
||||
"status": "completed"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 1,
|
||||
"name": "execute",
|
||||
"type": "execution",
|
||||
"status": "pending"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"execution_results": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"index": 0,
|
||||
"command": "lite-fix",
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"started_at": "2025-01-29T14:30:25Z",
|
||||
"session_id": "fix-login-2025-01-29",
|
||||
"artifact": ".workflow/.lite-fix/fix-login-2025-01-29/fix-plan.json"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Status Values
|
||||
|
||||
- `running`: Orchestrator actively executing
|
||||
- `waiting`: Paused, waiting for external events
|
||||
- `completed`: All commands finished successfully
|
||||
- `failed`: Error occurred or user aborted
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Type Routing (Pipeline Summary)
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: 【 】marks Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元) - these commands must execute together.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task Type | Pipeline | Minimum Units |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|---|
|
||||
| **bugfix** | Bug报告 →【@~/.codex/prompts/lite-fix.md → @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md】→ 修复代码 | Bug Fix |
|
||||
| **discovery** | 需求 →【@~/.codex/prompts/issue-discover.md → @~/.codex/prompts/issue-plan.md → @~/.codex/prompts/issue-queue.md → @~/.codex/prompts/issue-execute.md】→ 完成 issues | Issue Workflow |
|
||||
| **analysis** | 需求 → @~/.codex/prompts/analyze-with-file.md → 分析报告 | Analyze With File |
|
||||
| **cleanup** | 代码库 → @~/.codex/prompts/clean.md → 清理完成 | Cleanup |
|
||||
| **brainstorm** | 主题 →【@~/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md → @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md】→ 实现代码 | Brainstorm to Execution |
|
||||
| **batch-planning** | 需求集合 →【@~/.codex/prompts/merge-plans-with-file.md → @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md】→ 代码完成 | Merge Multiple Plans |
|
||||
| **feature** (simple) | 需求 →【@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md → @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md】→ 代码 | Quick Implementation |
|
||||
| **feature** (complex) | 需求 → @~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-b.md → 详细计划 → @~/.codex/prompts/execute.md → 代码 | Complex Planning |
|
||||
|
||||
## Available Commands Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Planning Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **lite-plan-a** | Lightweight merged-mode planning | `@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md TASK="..."` | plan.json |
|
||||
| **lite-plan-b** | Multi-angle exploration planning | `@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-b.md TASK="..."` | plan.json |
|
||||
| **lite-plan-c** | Parallel angle planning | `@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-c.md TASK="..."` | plan.json |
|
||||
| **quick-plan-with-file** | Quick planning with file tracking | `@~/.codex/prompts/quick-plan-with-file.md TASK="..."` | plan + docs |
|
||||
| **merge-plans-with-file** | Merge multiple plans | `@~/.codex/prompts/merge-plans-with-file.md PLANS="..."` | merged-plan.json |
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **execute** | Execute tasks from plan | `@~/.codex/prompts/execute.md SESSION=".../plan/"` | Working code |
|
||||
| **unified-execute-with-file** | Execute with file tracking | `@~/.codex/prompts/unified-execute-with-file.md SESSION="..."` | Code + tracking |
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fix Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **lite-fix** | Quick bug diagnosis and planning | `@~/.codex/prompts/lite-fix.md BUG="..."` | fix-plan.json |
|
||||
| **debug-with-file** | Hypothesis-driven debugging | `@~/.codex/prompts/debug-with-file.md BUG="..."` | understanding.md |
|
||||
|
||||
### Discovery Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **issue-discover** | Multi-perspective issue discovery | `@~/.codex/prompts/issue-discover.md PATTERN="src/**"` | issues.jsonl |
|
||||
| **issue-discover-by-prompt** | Prompt-based discovery | `@~/.codex/prompts/issue-discover-by-prompt.md PROMPT="..."` | issues |
|
||||
| **issue-plan** | Plan issue solutions | `@~/.codex/prompts/issue-plan.md --all-pending` | issue-plans.json |
|
||||
| **issue-queue** | Form execution queue | `@~/.codex/prompts/issue-queue.md --from-plan` | queue.json |
|
||||
| **issue-execute** | Execute issue queue | `@~/.codex/prompts/issue-execute.md QUEUE="..."` | Completed |
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **analyze-with-file** | Collaborative analysis | `@~/.codex/prompts/analyze-with-file.md TOPIC="..."` | discussion.md |
|
||||
|
||||
### Brainstorm Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **brainstorm-with-file** | Multi-perspective brainstorming | `@~/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md TOPIC="..."` | brainstorm.md |
|
||||
| **brainstorm-to-cycle** | Bridge brainstorm to execution | `@~/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-to-cycle.md` | Executable plan |
|
||||
|
||||
### Utility Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Purpose | Usage | Output |
|
||||
|---------|---------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| **clean** | Intelligent code cleanup | `@~/.codex/prompts/clean.md` | Cleaned code |
|
||||
| **compact** | Compact session memory | `@~/.codex/prompts/compact.md SESSION="..."` | Compressed state |
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input: TASK="..."
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Phase 1: analyzeRequirements(task)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Phase 2: recommendCommandChain(analysis)
|
||||
Display pipeline and commands
|
||||
↓
|
||||
User Confirmation
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Phase 3: executeCommandChain(chain, analysis)
|
||||
├─ For each command:
|
||||
│ ├─ Update state to "running"
|
||||
│ ├─ Build command string with parameters
|
||||
│ ├─ Execute @command [] with parameters
|
||||
│ ├─ Save execution results
|
||||
│ └─ Update state to "completed"
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Output completion summary
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Atomic Execution** - Never split minimum execution units
|
||||
2. **State Persistence** - All state saved to JSON
|
||||
3. **User Control** - Confirmation before execution
|
||||
4. **Context Passing** - Parameters chain across commands
|
||||
5. **Resume Support** - Can resume from state.json
|
||||
6. **Intelligent Routing** - Task type determines command chain
|
||||
7. **Complexity Awareness** - Different paths for simple vs complex tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Invocation Format
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: `@~/.codex/prompts/<command-name>.md <parameters>`
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md TASK="Implement user authentication"
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/execute.md SESSION=".workflow/.lite-plan/..."
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/lite-fix.md BUG="Login fails with 404 error"
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/issue-discover.md PATTERN="src/auth/**"
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md TOPIC="Improve user onboarding"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Situation | Action |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| Unknown task type | Default to feature implementation |
|
||||
| Command not found | Error: command not available |
|
||||
| Execution fails | Report error, offer retry or skip |
|
||||
| Invalid parameters | Validate and ask for correction |
|
||||
| Circular dependency | Detect and report |
|
||||
| All commands fail | Report and suggest manual intervention |
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Management
|
||||
|
||||
**Resume Previous Session**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Find session in .workflow/.codex-coordinator/
|
||||
2. Load state.json
|
||||
3. Identify last completed command
|
||||
4. Restart from next pending command
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**View Session Progress**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
cat .workflow/.codex-coordinator/{session-id}/state.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
The coordinator workflow follows these steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Parse Input**: Extract task description from TASK parameter
|
||||
2. **Analyze**: Determine goal, scope, complexity, and task type
|
||||
3. **Recommend**: Build optimal command chain based on analysis
|
||||
4. **Confirm**: Display pipeline and request user approval
|
||||
5. **Execute**: Run commands sequentially with state tracking
|
||||
6. **Report**: Display final results and artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
To use this coordinator, invoke it as a Claude Code command (not a Codex command):
|
||||
|
||||
From the Claude Code CLI, you would call Codex commands like:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md TASK="Your task description"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or with options:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@~/.codex/prompts/lite-plan-a.md TASK="..." --depth=deep
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This coordinator orchestrates such Codex commands based on your task requirements.
|
||||
93
.claude/commands/enhance-prompt.md
Normal file
93
.claude/commands/enhance-prompt.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: enhance-prompt
|
||||
description: Enhanced prompt transformation using session memory and intent analysis with --enhance flag detection
|
||||
argument-hint: "user input to enhance"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Systematically enhances user prompts by leveraging session memory context and intent analysis, translating ambiguous requests into actionable specifications.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
**Enhancement Pipeline:**
|
||||
`Intent Translation` → `Context Integration` → `Structured Output`
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Sources:**
|
||||
- Session memory (conversation history, previous analysis)
|
||||
- Implicit technical requirements
|
||||
- User intent patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Enhancement Rules
|
||||
|
||||
### Intent Translation
|
||||
|
||||
| User Says | Translate To | Focus |
|
||||
|-----------|--------------|-------|
|
||||
| "fix" | Debug and resolve | Root cause → preserve behavior |
|
||||
| "improve" | Enhance/optimize | Performance/readability |
|
||||
| "add" | Implement feature | Integration + edge cases |
|
||||
| "refactor" | Restructure quality | Maintain behavior |
|
||||
| "update" | Modernize | Version compatibility |
|
||||
|
||||
### Context Integration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Memory:**
|
||||
- Reference recent conversation context
|
||||
- Reuse previously identified patterns
|
||||
- Build on established understanding
|
||||
- Infer technical requirements from discussion
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# User: "add login"
|
||||
# Session Memory: Previous auth discussion, JWT mentioned
|
||||
# Inferred: JWT-based auth, integrate with existing session management
|
||||
# Action: Implement JWT authentication with session persistence
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
INTENT: [Clear technical goal]
|
||||
CONTEXT: [Session memory + codebase patterns]
|
||||
ACTION: [Specific implementation steps]
|
||||
ATTENTION: [Critical constraints]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Examples
|
||||
|
||||
**Example 1:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Input: "fix login button"
|
||||
INTENT: Debug non-functional login button
|
||||
CONTEXT: From session - OAuth flow discussed, known state issue
|
||||
ACTION: Check event binding → verify state updates → test auth flow
|
||||
ATTENTION: Preserve existing OAuth integration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example 2:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Input: "refactor payment code"
|
||||
INTENT: Restructure payment module for maintainability
|
||||
CONTEXT: Session memory - PCI compliance requirements, Stripe integration patterns
|
||||
ACTION: Extract reusable validators → isolate payment gateway logic → maintain adapter pattern
|
||||
ATTENTION: Zero behavior change, maintain PCI compliance, full test coverage
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Enhancement Triggers
|
||||
|
||||
- Ambiguous language: "fix", "improve", "clean up"
|
||||
- Vague requests requiring clarification
|
||||
- Complex technical requirements
|
||||
- Architecture changes
|
||||
- Critical systems: auth, payment, security
|
||||
- Multi-step refactoring
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Session Memory First**: Leverage conversation context and established understanding
|
||||
2. **Context Reuse**: Build on previous discussions and decisions
|
||||
3. **Clear Output**: Structured, actionable specifications
|
||||
4. **Intent Clarification**: Transform vague requests into specific technical goals
|
||||
5. **Avoid Duplication**: Reference existing context, don't repeat
|
||||
@@ -1,675 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Flow Template Generator
|
||||
|
||||
Generate workflow templates for meta-skill/flow-coordinator.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/meta-skill:flow-create [template-name] [--output <path>]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/meta-skill:flow-create bugfix-v2
|
||||
/meta-skill:flow-create my-workflow --output ~/.claude/skills/my-skill/templates/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User Input → Phase 1: Template Design → Phase 2: Step Definition → Phase 3: Generate JSON
|
||||
↓ ↓ ↓
|
||||
Name + Description Define workflow steps Write template file
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Template Design
|
||||
|
||||
Gather basic template information:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function designTemplate(input) {
|
||||
const templateName = parseTemplateName(input) || await askTemplateName();
|
||||
|
||||
const metadata = await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
question: "What is the purpose of this workflow template?",
|
||||
header: "Purpose",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Feature Development", description: "Implement new features with planning and testing" },
|
||||
{ label: "Bug Fix", description: "Diagnose and fix bugs with verification" },
|
||||
{ label: "TDD Development", description: "Test-driven development workflow" },
|
||||
{ label: "Code Review", description: "Review cycle with findings and fixes" },
|
||||
{ label: "Testing", description: "Test generation and validation" },
|
||||
{ label: "Issue Workflow", description: "Complete issue lifecycle (discover → plan → queue → execute)" },
|
||||
{ label: "With-File Workflow", description: "Documented exploration (brainstorm/debug/analyze)" },
|
||||
{ label: "Custom", description: "Define custom workflow purpose" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
question: "What complexity level?",
|
||||
header: "Level",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Level 1 (Rapid)", description: "1-2 steps, ultra-lightweight (lite-lite-lite)" },
|
||||
{ label: "Level 2 (Lightweight)", description: "2-4 steps, quick implementation" },
|
||||
{ label: "Level 3 (Standard)", description: "4-6 steps, with verification and testing" },
|
||||
{ label: "Level 4 (Full)", description: "6+ steps, brainstorm + full workflow" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
name: templateName,
|
||||
description: generateDescription(templateName, metadata.Purpose),
|
||||
level: parseLevel(metadata.Level),
|
||||
purpose: metadata.Purpose
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Step Definition
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2.1: Select Command Category
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function selectCommandCategory() {
|
||||
return await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Select command category",
|
||||
header: "Category",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Planning", description: "lite-plan, plan, multi-cli-plan, tdd-plan, quick-plan-with-file" },
|
||||
{ label: "Execution", description: "lite-execute, execute, unified-execute-with-file" },
|
||||
{ label: "Testing", description: "test-fix-gen, test-cycle-execute, test-gen, tdd-verify" },
|
||||
{ label: "Review", description: "review-session-cycle, review-module-cycle, review-cycle-fix" },
|
||||
{ label: "Bug Fix", description: "lite-fix, debug-with-file" },
|
||||
{ label: "Brainstorm", description: "brainstorm-with-file, brainstorm:auto-parallel" },
|
||||
{ label: "Analysis", description: "analyze-with-file" },
|
||||
{ label: "Issue", description: "discover, plan, queue, execute, from-brainstorm, convert-to-plan" },
|
||||
{ label: "Utility", description: "clean, init, replan, status" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2.2: Select Specific Command
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function selectCommand(category) {
|
||||
const commandOptions = {
|
||||
'Planning': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:lite-plan", description: "Lightweight merged-mode planning" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:plan", description: "Full planning with architecture design" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:multi-cli-plan", description: "Multi-CLI collaborative planning (Gemini+Codex+Claude)" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:tdd-plan", description: "TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:quick-plan-with-file", description: "Rapid planning with minimal docs" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:plan-verify", description: "Verify plan against requirements" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:replan", description: "Update plan and execute changes" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Execution': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:lite-execute", description: "Execute from in-memory plan" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:execute", description: "Execute from planning session" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:unified-execute-with-file", description: "Universal execution engine" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:lite-lite-lite", description: "Ultra-lightweight multi-tool execution" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Testing': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:test-fix-gen", description: "Generate test tasks for specific issues" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", description: "Execute iterative test-fix cycle (>=95% pass)" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:test-gen", description: "Generate comprehensive test suite" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:tdd-verify", description: "Verify TDD workflow compliance" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Review': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:review-session-cycle", description: "Session-based multi-dimensional code review" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:review-module-cycle", description: "Module-focused code review" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:review-cycle-fix", description: "Fix review findings with prioritization" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:review", description: "Post-implementation review" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Bug Fix': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:lite-fix", description: "Lightweight bug diagnosis and fix" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:debug-with-file", description: "Hypothesis-driven debugging with documentation" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Brainstorm': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:brainstorm-with-file", description: "Multi-perspective ideation with documentation" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel", description: "Parallel multi-role brainstorming" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Analysis': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:analyze-with-file", description: "Collaborative analysis with documentation" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Issue': [
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:discover", description: "Multi-perspective issue discovery" },
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:discover-by-prompt", description: "Prompt-based issue discovery with Gemini" },
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:plan", description: "Plan issue solutions" },
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:queue", description: "Form execution queue with conflict analysis" },
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:execute", description: "Execute issue queue with DAG orchestration" },
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:from-brainstorm", description: "Convert brainstorm to issue" },
|
||||
{ label: "/issue:convert-to-plan", description: "Convert planning artifacts to issue solutions" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
'Utility': [
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:clean", description: "Intelligent code cleanup" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:init", description: "Initialize project-level state" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:replan", description: "Interactive workflow replanning" },
|
||||
{ label: "/workflow:status", description: "Generate workflow status views" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
return await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Select ${category} command`,
|
||||
header: "Command",
|
||||
options: commandOptions[category] || commandOptions['Planning'],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2.3: Select Execution Unit
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function selectExecutionUnit() {
|
||||
return await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Select execution unit (atomic command group)",
|
||||
header: "Unit",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
// Planning + Execution Units
|
||||
{ label: "quick-implementation", description: "【lite-plan → lite-execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "multi-cli-planning", description: "【multi-cli-plan → lite-execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "full-planning-execution", description: "【plan → execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "verified-planning-execution", description: "【plan → plan-verify → execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "replanning-execution", description: "【replan → execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "tdd-planning-execution", description: "【tdd-plan → execute】" },
|
||||
// Testing Units
|
||||
{ label: "test-validation", description: "【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "test-generation-execution", description: "【test-gen → execute】" },
|
||||
// Review Units
|
||||
{ label: "code-review", description: "【review-*-cycle → review-cycle-fix】" },
|
||||
// Bug Fix Units
|
||||
{ label: "bug-fix", description: "【lite-fix → lite-execute】" },
|
||||
// Issue Units
|
||||
{ label: "issue-workflow", description: "【discover → plan → queue → execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "rapid-to-issue", description: "【lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute】" },
|
||||
{ label: "brainstorm-to-issue", description: "【from-brainstorm → queue → execute】" },
|
||||
// With-File Units (self-contained)
|
||||
{ label: "brainstorm-with-file", description: "Self-contained brainstorming workflow" },
|
||||
{ label: "debug-with-file", description: "Self-contained debugging workflow" },
|
||||
{ label: "analyze-with-file", description: "Self-contained analysis workflow" },
|
||||
// Standalone
|
||||
{ label: "standalone", description: "Single command, no atomic grouping" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2.4: Select Execution Mode
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function selectExecutionMode() {
|
||||
return await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Execution mode for this step?",
|
||||
header: "Mode",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "mainprocess", description: "Run in main process (blocking, synchronous)" },
|
||||
{ label: "async", description: "Run asynchronously (background, hook callbacks)" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Complete Step Definition Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function defineSteps(templateDesign) {
|
||||
// Suggest steps based on purpose
|
||||
const suggestedSteps = getSuggestedSteps(templateDesign.purpose);
|
||||
|
||||
const customize = await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Use suggested steps or customize?",
|
||||
header: "Steps",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Use Suggested", description: `Suggested: ${suggestedSteps.map(s => s.cmd).join(' → ')}` },
|
||||
{ label: "Customize", description: "Modify or add custom steps" },
|
||||
{ label: "Start Empty", description: "Define all steps from scratch" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (customize.Steps === "Use Suggested") {
|
||||
return suggestedSteps;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Interactive step definition
|
||||
const steps = [];
|
||||
let addMore = true;
|
||||
while (addMore) {
|
||||
const category = await selectCommandCategory();
|
||||
const command = await selectCommand(category.Category);
|
||||
const unit = await selectExecutionUnit();
|
||||
const execMode = await selectExecutionMode();
|
||||
const contextHint = await askContextHint(command.Command);
|
||||
|
||||
steps.push({
|
||||
cmd: command.Command,
|
||||
args: command.Command.includes('plan') || command.Command.includes('fix') ? '"{{goal}}"' : undefined,
|
||||
unit: unit.Unit,
|
||||
execution: {
|
||||
type: "slash-command",
|
||||
mode: execMode.Mode
|
||||
},
|
||||
contextHint: contextHint
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const continueAdding = await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Added step ${steps.length}: ${command.Command}. Add another?`,
|
||||
header: "Continue",
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Add More", description: "Define another step" },
|
||||
{ label: "Done", description: "Finish step definition" }
|
||||
],
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
addMore = continueAdding.Continue === "Add More";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return steps;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Suggested Step Templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Development (Level 2 - Rapid)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "rapid",
|
||||
"description": "Quick implementation with testing",
|
||||
"level": 2,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-plan", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "quick-implementation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Create lightweight implementation plan" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute", "args": "--in-memory", "unit": "quick-implementation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Execute implementation based on plan" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate test tasks" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle until pass rate >= 95%" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Development (Level 3 - Coupled)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "coupled",
|
||||
"description": "Full workflow with verification, review, and testing",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:plan", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "verified-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Create detailed implementation plan" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:plan-verify", "unit": "verified-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Verify plan against requirements" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:execute", "unit": "verified-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute implementation" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:review-session-cycle", "unit": "code-review", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Multi-dimensional code review" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:review-cycle-fix", "unit": "code-review", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Fix review findings" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate test tasks" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fix (Level 2)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "bugfix",
|
||||
"description": "Bug diagnosis and fix with testing",
|
||||
"level": 2,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-fix", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "bug-fix", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Diagnose and plan bug fix" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute", "args": "--in-memory", "unit": "bug-fix", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Execute bug fix" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate regression tests" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Verify fix with tests" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Fix Hotfix (Level 2)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "bugfix-hotfix",
|
||||
"description": "Urgent production bug fix (no tests)",
|
||||
"level": 2,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-fix", "args": "--hotfix \"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "standalone", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Emergency hotfix mode" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### TDD Development (Level 3)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "tdd",
|
||||
"description": "Test-driven development with Red-Green-Refactor",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:tdd-plan", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "tdd-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Create TDD task chain" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:execute", "unit": "tdd-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute TDD cycle" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:tdd-verify", "unit": "standalone", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Verify TDD compliance" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Review (Level 3)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "review",
|
||||
"description": "Code review cycle with fixes and testing",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:review-session-cycle", "unit": "code-review", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Multi-dimensional code review" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:review-cycle-fix", "unit": "code-review", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Fix review findings" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate tests for fixes" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Verify fixes pass tests" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Fix (Level 3)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "test-fix",
|
||||
"description": "Fix failing tests",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate test fix tasks" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue Workflow (Level Issue)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "issue",
|
||||
"description": "Complete issue lifecycle",
|
||||
"level": "Issue",
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:discover", "unit": "issue-workflow", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Discover issues from codebase" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:plan", "args": "--all-pending", "unit": "issue-workflow", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Plan issue solutions" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:queue", "unit": "issue-workflow", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Form execution queue" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:execute", "unit": "issue-workflow", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute issue queue" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Rapid to Issue (Level 2.5)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "rapid-to-issue",
|
||||
"description": "Bridge lightweight planning to issue workflow",
|
||||
"level": 2,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-plan", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "rapid-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Create lightweight plan" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:convert-to-plan", "args": "--latest-lite-plan -y", "unit": "rapid-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Convert to issue plan" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:queue", "unit": "rapid-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Form execution queue" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:execute", "args": "--queue auto", "unit": "rapid-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute issue queue" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Brainstorm to Issue (Level 4)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "brainstorm-to-issue",
|
||||
"description": "Bridge brainstorm session to issue workflow",
|
||||
"level": 4,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:from-brainstorm", "args": "SESSION=\"{{session}}\" --auto", "unit": "brainstorm-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Convert brainstorm to issue" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:queue", "unit": "brainstorm-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Form execution queue" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/issue:execute", "args": "--queue auto", "unit": "brainstorm-to-issue", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute issue queue" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### With-File: Brainstorm (Level 4)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "brainstorm",
|
||||
"description": "Multi-perspective ideation with documentation",
|
||||
"level": 4,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:brainstorm-with-file", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "brainstorm-with-file", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Multi-CLI brainstorming with documented diverge-converge cycles" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### With-File: Debug (Level 3)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "debug",
|
||||
"description": "Hypothesis-driven debugging with documentation",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:debug-with-file", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "debug-with-file", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Hypothesis-driven debugging with Gemini validation" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### With-File: Analyze (Level 3)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "analyze",
|
||||
"description": "Collaborative analysis with documentation",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:analyze-with-file", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "analyze-with-file", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Multi-round collaborative analysis with CLI exploration" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Full Workflow (Level 4)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "full",
|
||||
"description": "Complete workflow: brainstorm → plan → execute → test",
|
||||
"level": 4,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "standalone", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Parallel multi-perspective brainstorming" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:plan", "unit": "verified-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Create detailed plan from brainstorm" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:plan-verify", "unit": "verified-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Verify plan quality" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:execute", "unit": "verified-planning-execution", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute implementation" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate comprehensive tests" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute test cycle" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Multi-CLI Planning (Level 3)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "multi-cli-plan",
|
||||
"description": "Multi-CLI collaborative planning with cross-verification",
|
||||
"level": 3,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:multi-cli-plan", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "multi-cli-planning", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Gemini+Codex+Claude collaborative planning" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute", "args": "--in-memory", "unit": "multi-cli-planning", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Execute converged plan" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Generate tests" },
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute", "unit": "test-validation", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" }, "contextHint": "Execute test cycle" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Ultra-Lightweight (Level 1)
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "lite-lite-lite",
|
||||
"description": "Ultra-lightweight multi-tool execution",
|
||||
"level": 1,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{ "cmd": "/workflow:lite-lite-lite", "args": "\"{{goal}}\"", "unit": "standalone", "execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" }, "contextHint": "Direct execution with minimal overhead" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Port Reference
|
||||
|
||||
Each command has input/output ports for pipeline composition:
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Input Port | Output Port | Atomic Unit |
|
||||
|---------|------------|-------------|-------------|
|
||||
| **Planning** |
|
||||
| lite-plan | requirement | plan | quick-implementation |
|
||||
| plan | requirement | detailed-plan | full-planning-execution |
|
||||
| plan-verify | detailed-plan | verified-plan | verified-planning-execution |
|
||||
| multi-cli-plan | requirement | multi-cli-plan | multi-cli-planning |
|
||||
| tdd-plan | requirement | tdd-tasks | tdd-planning-execution |
|
||||
| replan | session, feedback | replan | replanning-execution |
|
||||
| **Execution** |
|
||||
| lite-execute | plan, multi-cli-plan, lite-fix | code | (multiple) |
|
||||
| execute | detailed-plan, verified-plan, replan, tdd-tasks | code | (multiple) |
|
||||
| **Testing** |
|
||||
| test-fix-gen | failing-tests, session | test-tasks | test-validation |
|
||||
| test-cycle-execute | test-tasks | test-passed | test-validation |
|
||||
| test-gen | code, session | test-tasks | test-generation-execution |
|
||||
| tdd-verify | code | tdd-verified | standalone |
|
||||
| **Review** |
|
||||
| review-session-cycle | code, session | review-verified | code-review |
|
||||
| review-module-cycle | module-pattern | review-verified | code-review |
|
||||
| review-cycle-fix | review-findings | fixed-code | code-review |
|
||||
| **Bug Fix** |
|
||||
| lite-fix | bug-report | lite-fix | bug-fix |
|
||||
| debug-with-file | bug-report | understanding-document | debug-with-file |
|
||||
| **With-File** |
|
||||
| brainstorm-with-file | exploration-topic | brainstorm-document | brainstorm-with-file |
|
||||
| analyze-with-file | analysis-topic | discussion-document | analyze-with-file |
|
||||
| **Issue** |
|
||||
| issue:discover | codebase | pending-issues | issue-workflow |
|
||||
| issue:plan | pending-issues | issue-plans | issue-workflow |
|
||||
| issue:queue | issue-plans, converted-plan | execution-queue | issue-workflow |
|
||||
| issue:execute | execution-queue | completed-issues | issue-workflow |
|
||||
| issue:convert-to-plan | plan | converted-plan | rapid-to-issue |
|
||||
| issue:from-brainstorm | brainstorm-document | converted-plan | brainstorm-to-issue |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
|
||||
|
||||
**Definition**: Commands that must execute together as an atomic group.
|
||||
|
||||
| Unit Name | Commands | Purpose |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| **quick-implementation** | lite-plan → lite-execute | Lightweight plan and execution |
|
||||
| **multi-cli-planning** | multi-cli-plan → lite-execute | Multi-perspective planning and execution |
|
||||
| **bug-fix** | lite-fix → lite-execute | Bug diagnosis and fix |
|
||||
| **full-planning-execution** | plan → execute | Detailed planning and execution |
|
||||
| **verified-planning-execution** | plan → plan-verify → execute | Planning with verification |
|
||||
| **replanning-execution** | replan → execute | Update plan and execute |
|
||||
| **tdd-planning-execution** | tdd-plan → execute | TDD planning and execution |
|
||||
| **test-validation** | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute | Test generation and fix cycle |
|
||||
| **test-generation-execution** | test-gen → execute | Generate and execute tests |
|
||||
| **code-review** | review-*-cycle → review-cycle-fix | Review and fix findings |
|
||||
| **issue-workflow** | discover → plan → queue → execute | Complete issue lifecycle |
|
||||
| **rapid-to-issue** | lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute | Bridge to issue workflow |
|
||||
| **brainstorm-to-issue** | from-brainstorm → queue → execute | Brainstorm to issue bridge |
|
||||
| **brainstorm-with-file** | (self-contained) | Multi-perspective ideation |
|
||||
| **debug-with-file** | (self-contained) | Hypothesis-driven debugging |
|
||||
| **analyze-with-file** | (self-contained) | Collaborative analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Generate JSON
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function generateTemplate(design, steps, outputPath) {
|
||||
const template = {
|
||||
name: design.name,
|
||||
description: design.description,
|
||||
level: design.level,
|
||||
steps: steps
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const finalPath = outputPath || `~/.claude/skills/flow-coordinator/templates/${design.name}.json`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Write template
|
||||
Write(finalPath, JSON.stringify(template, null, 2));
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate
|
||||
const validation = validateTemplate(template);
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`✅ Template created: ${finalPath}`);
|
||||
console.log(` Steps: ${template.steps.length}`);
|
||||
console.log(` Level: ${template.level}`);
|
||||
console.log(` Units: ${[...new Set(template.steps.map(s => s.unit))].join(', ')}`);
|
||||
|
||||
return { path: finalPath, template, validation };
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "template-name",
|
||||
"description": "Template description",
|
||||
"level": 2,
|
||||
"steps": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cmd": "/workflow:command",
|
||||
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
|
||||
"unit": "unit-name",
|
||||
"execution": {
|
||||
"type": "slash-command",
|
||||
"mode": "mainprocess"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"contextHint": "Description of what this step does"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
**Create a quick bugfix template**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
/meta-skill:flow-create hotfix-simple
|
||||
|
||||
→ Purpose: Bug Fix
|
||||
→ Level: 2 (Lightweight)
|
||||
→ Steps: Use Suggested
|
||||
→ Output: ~/.claude/skills/flow-coordinator/templates/hotfix-simple.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Create a custom multi-stage workflow**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
/meta-skill:flow-create complex-feature --output ~/.claude/skills/my-project/templates/
|
||||
|
||||
→ Purpose: Feature Development
|
||||
→ Level: 3 (Standard)
|
||||
→ Steps: Customize
|
||||
→ Step 1: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel (standalone, mainprocess)
|
||||
→ Step 2: /workflow:plan (verified-planning-execution, mainprocess)
|
||||
→ Step 3: /workflow:plan-verify (verified-planning-execution, mainprocess)
|
||||
→ Step 4: /workflow:execute (verified-planning-execution, async)
|
||||
→ Step 5: /workflow:review-session-cycle (code-review, mainprocess)
|
||||
→ Step 6: /workflow:review-cycle-fix (code-review, mainprocess)
|
||||
→ Done
|
||||
→ Output: ~/.claude/skills/my-project/templates/complex-feature.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,718 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: convert-to-plan
|
||||
description: Convert planning artifacts (lite-plan, workflow session, markdown) to issue solutions
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] [--issue <id>] [--supplement] <SOURCE>"
|
||||
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Skip confirmation, auto-create issue and bind solution.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue Convert-to-Plan Command (/issue:convert-to-plan)
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Converts various planning artifact formats into issue workflow solutions with intelligent detection and automatic binding.
|
||||
|
||||
**Supported Sources** (auto-detected):
|
||||
- **lite-plan**: `.workflow/.lite-plan/{slug}/plan.json`
|
||||
- **workflow-session**: `WFS-xxx` ID or `.workflow/active/{session}/` folder
|
||||
- **markdown**: Any `.md` file with implementation/task content
|
||||
- **json**: Direct JSON files matching plan-json-schema
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Convert lite-plan to new issue (auto-creates issue)
|
||||
/issue:convert-to-plan ".workflow/.lite-plan/implement-auth-2026-01-25"
|
||||
|
||||
# Convert workflow session to existing issue
|
||||
/issue:convert-to-plan WFS-auth-impl --issue GH-123
|
||||
|
||||
# Supplement existing solution with additional tasks
|
||||
/issue:convert-to-plan "./docs/additional-tasks.md" --issue ISS-001 --supplement
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto mode - skip confirmations
|
||||
/issue:convert-to-plan ".workflow/.lite-plan/my-plan" -y
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Options
|
||||
|
||||
| Option | Description | Default |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| `<SOURCE>` | Planning artifact path or WFS-xxx ID | Required |
|
||||
| `--issue <id>` | Bind to existing issue instead of creating new | Auto-create |
|
||||
| `--supplement` | Add tasks to existing solution (requires --issue) | false |
|
||||
| `-y, --yes` | Skip all confirmations | false |
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Data Access Principle
|
||||
|
||||
**⚠️ Important**: Use CLI commands for all issue/solution operations.
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | Correct | Incorrect |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|-----------|
|
||||
| Get issue | `ccw issue status <id> --json` | Read issues.jsonl directly |
|
||||
| Create issue | `ccw issue init <id> --title "..."` | Write to issues.jsonl |
|
||||
| Bind solution | `ccw issue bind <id> <sol-id>` | Edit issues.jsonl |
|
||||
| List solutions | `ccw issue solutions --issue <id> --brief` | Read solutions/*.jsonl |
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution Schema Reference
|
||||
|
||||
Target format for all extracted data (from solution-schema.json):
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
interface Solution {
|
||||
id: string; // SOL-{issue-id}-{4-char-uid}
|
||||
description?: string; // High-level summary
|
||||
approach?: string; // Technical strategy
|
||||
tasks: Task[]; // Required: at least 1 task
|
||||
exploration_context?: object; // Optional: source context
|
||||
analysis?: { risk, impact, complexity };
|
||||
score?: number; // 0.0-1.0
|
||||
is_bound: boolean;
|
||||
created_at: string;
|
||||
bound_at?: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface Task {
|
||||
id: string; // T1, T2, T3... (pattern: ^T[0-9]+$)
|
||||
title: string; // Required: action verb + target
|
||||
scope: string; // Required: module path or feature area
|
||||
action: Action; // Required: Create|Update|Implement|...
|
||||
description?: string;
|
||||
modification_points?: Array<{file, target, change}>;
|
||||
implementation: string[]; // Required: step-by-step guide
|
||||
test?: { unit?, integration?, commands?, coverage_target? };
|
||||
acceptance: { criteria: string[], verification: string[] }; // Required
|
||||
commit?: { type, scope, message_template, breaking? };
|
||||
depends_on?: string[];
|
||||
priority?: number; // 1-5 (default: 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type Action = 'Create' | 'Update' | 'Implement' | 'Refactor' | 'Add' | 'Delete' | 'Configure' | 'Test' | 'Fix';
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Parse Arguments & Detect Source Type
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const input = userInput.trim();
|
||||
const flags = parseFlags(userInput); // --issue, --supplement, -y/--yes
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract source path (first non-flag argument)
|
||||
const source = extractSourceArg(input);
|
||||
|
||||
// Detect source type
|
||||
function detectSourceType(source) {
|
||||
// Check for WFS-xxx pattern (workflow session ID)
|
||||
if (source.match(/^WFS-[\w-]+$/)) {
|
||||
return { type: 'workflow-session-id', path: `.workflow/active/${source}` };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if directory
|
||||
const isDir = Bash(`test -d "${source}" && echo "dir" || echo "file"`).trim() === 'dir';
|
||||
|
||||
if (isDir) {
|
||||
// Check for lite-plan indicator
|
||||
const hasPlanJson = Bash(`test -f "${source}/plan.json" && echo "yes" || echo "no"`).trim() === 'yes';
|
||||
if (hasPlanJson) {
|
||||
return { type: 'lite-plan', path: source };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for workflow session indicator
|
||||
const hasSession = Bash(`test -f "${source}/workflow-session.json" && echo "yes" || echo "no"`).trim() === 'yes';
|
||||
if (hasSession) {
|
||||
return { type: 'workflow-session', path: source };
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check file extensions
|
||||
if (source.endsWith('.json')) {
|
||||
return { type: 'json-file', path: source };
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (source.endsWith('.md')) {
|
||||
return { type: 'markdown-file', path: source };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if path exists at all
|
||||
const exists = Bash(`test -e "${source}" && echo "yes" || echo "no"`).trim() === 'yes';
|
||||
if (!exists) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`E001: Source not found: ${source}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return { type: 'unknown', path: source };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const sourceInfo = detectSourceType(source);
|
||||
if (sourceInfo.type === 'unknown') {
|
||||
throw new Error(`E002: Unable to detect source format for: ${source}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`Detected source type: ${sourceInfo.type}`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Extract Data Using Format-Specific Extractor
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
let extracted = { title: '', approach: '', tasks: [], metadata: {} };
|
||||
|
||||
switch (sourceInfo.type) {
|
||||
case 'lite-plan':
|
||||
extracted = extractFromLitePlan(sourceInfo.path);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 'workflow-session':
|
||||
case 'workflow-session-id':
|
||||
extracted = extractFromWorkflowSession(sourceInfo.path);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 'markdown-file':
|
||||
extracted = await extractFromMarkdownAI(sourceInfo.path);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 'json-file':
|
||||
extracted = extractFromJsonFile(sourceInfo.path);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate extraction
|
||||
if (!extracted.tasks || extracted.tasks.length === 0) {
|
||||
throw new Error('E006: No tasks extracted from source');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure task IDs are normalized to T1, T2, T3...
|
||||
extracted.tasks = normalizeTaskIds(extracted.tasks);
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`Extracted: ${extracted.tasks.length} tasks`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Extractor: Lite-Plan
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function extractFromLitePlan(folderPath) {
|
||||
const planJson = Read(`${folderPath}/plan.json`);
|
||||
const plan = JSON.parse(planJson);
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
title: plan.summary?.split('.')[0]?.trim() || 'Untitled Plan',
|
||||
description: plan.summary,
|
||||
approach: plan.approach,
|
||||
tasks: plan.tasks.map(t => ({
|
||||
id: t.id,
|
||||
title: t.title,
|
||||
scope: t.scope || '',
|
||||
action: t.action || 'Implement',
|
||||
description: t.description || t.title,
|
||||
modification_points: t.modification_points || [],
|
||||
implementation: Array.isArray(t.implementation) ? t.implementation : [t.implementation || ''],
|
||||
test: t.verification ? {
|
||||
unit: t.verification.unit_tests,
|
||||
integration: t.verification.integration_tests,
|
||||
commands: t.verification.manual_checks
|
||||
} : {},
|
||||
acceptance: {
|
||||
criteria: Array.isArray(t.acceptance) ? t.acceptance : [t.acceptance || ''],
|
||||
verification: t.verification?.manual_checks || []
|
||||
},
|
||||
depends_on: t.depends_on || [],
|
||||
priority: 3
|
||||
})),
|
||||
metadata: {
|
||||
source_type: 'lite-plan',
|
||||
source_path: folderPath,
|
||||
complexity: plan.complexity,
|
||||
estimated_time: plan.estimated_time,
|
||||
exploration_angles: plan._metadata?.exploration_angles || [],
|
||||
original_timestamp: plan._metadata?.timestamp
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Extractor: Workflow Session
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function extractFromWorkflowSession(sessionPath) {
|
||||
// Load session metadata
|
||||
const sessionJson = Read(`${sessionPath}/workflow-session.json`);
|
||||
const session = JSON.parse(sessionJson);
|
||||
|
||||
// Load IMPL_PLAN.md for approach (if exists)
|
||||
let approach = '';
|
||||
const implPlanPath = `${sessionPath}/IMPL_PLAN.md`;
|
||||
const hasImplPlan = Bash(`test -f "${implPlanPath}" && echo "yes" || echo "no"`).trim() === 'yes';
|
||||
if (hasImplPlan) {
|
||||
const implPlan = Read(implPlanPath);
|
||||
// Extract overview/approach section
|
||||
const overviewMatch = implPlan.match(/##\s*(?:Overview|Approach|Strategy)\s*\n([\s\S]*?)(?=\n##|$)/i);
|
||||
approach = overviewMatch?.[1]?.trim() || implPlan.split('\n').slice(0, 10).join('\n');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Load all task JSONs from .task folder
|
||||
const taskFiles = Glob({ pattern: `${sessionPath}/.task/IMPL-*.json` });
|
||||
const tasks = taskFiles.map(f => {
|
||||
const taskJson = Read(f);
|
||||
const task = JSON.parse(taskJson);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
id: task.id?.replace(/^IMPL-0*/, 'T') || 'T1', // IMPL-001 → T1
|
||||
title: task.title,
|
||||
scope: task.scope || inferScopeFromTask(task),
|
||||
action: capitalizeAction(task.type) || 'Implement',
|
||||
description: task.description,
|
||||
modification_points: task.implementation?.modification_points || [],
|
||||
implementation: task.implementation?.steps || [],
|
||||
test: task.implementation?.test || {},
|
||||
acceptance: {
|
||||
criteria: task.acceptance_criteria || [],
|
||||
verification: task.verification_steps || []
|
||||
},
|
||||
commit: task.commit,
|
||||
depends_on: (task.depends_on || []).map(d => d.replace(/^IMPL-0*/, 'T')),
|
||||
priority: task.priority || 3
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
title: session.name || session.description?.split('.')[0] || 'Workflow Session',
|
||||
description: session.description || session.name,
|
||||
approach: approach || session.description,
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
metadata: {
|
||||
source_type: 'workflow-session',
|
||||
source_path: sessionPath,
|
||||
session_id: session.id,
|
||||
created_at: session.created_at
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function inferScopeFromTask(task) {
|
||||
if (task.implementation?.modification_points?.length) {
|
||||
const files = task.implementation.modification_points.map(m => m.file);
|
||||
// Find common directory prefix
|
||||
const dirs = files.map(f => f.split('/').slice(0, -1).join('/'));
|
||||
return [...new Set(dirs)][0] || '';
|
||||
}
|
||||
return '';
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function capitalizeAction(type) {
|
||||
if (!type) return 'Implement';
|
||||
const map = { feature: 'Implement', bugfix: 'Fix', refactor: 'Refactor', test: 'Test', docs: 'Update' };
|
||||
return map[type.toLowerCase()] || type.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + type.slice(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Extractor: Markdown (AI-Assisted via Gemini)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
async function extractFromMarkdownAI(filePath) {
|
||||
const fileContent = Read(filePath);
|
||||
|
||||
// Use Gemini CLI for intelligent extraction
|
||||
const cliPrompt = `PURPOSE: Extract implementation plan from markdown document for issue solution conversion. Must output ONLY valid JSON.
|
||||
TASK: • Analyze document structure • Identify title/summary • Extract approach/strategy section • Parse tasks from any format (lists, tables, sections, code blocks) • Normalize each task to solution schema
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: Document content provided below
|
||||
EXPECTED: Valid JSON object with format:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "extracted title",
|
||||
"approach": "extracted approach/strategy",
|
||||
"tasks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "T1",
|
||||
"title": "task title",
|
||||
"scope": "module or feature area",
|
||||
"action": "Implement|Update|Create|Fix|Refactor|Add|Delete|Configure|Test",
|
||||
"description": "what to do",
|
||||
"implementation": ["step 1", "step 2"],
|
||||
"acceptance": ["criteria 1", "criteria 2"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Output ONLY valid JSON - no markdown, no explanation | Action must be one of: Create, Update, Implement, Refactor, Add, Delete, Configure, Test, Fix | Tasks must have id, title, scope, action, implementation (array), acceptance (array)
|
||||
|
||||
DOCUMENT CONTENT:
|
||||
${fileContent}`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Execute Gemini CLI
|
||||
const result = Bash(`ccw cli -p '${cliPrompt.replace(/'/g, "'\\''")}' --tool gemini --mode analysis`, { timeout: 120000 });
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse JSON from result (may be wrapped in markdown code block)
|
||||
let jsonText = result.trim();
|
||||
const jsonMatch = jsonText.match(/```(?:json)?\s*([\s\S]*?)```/);
|
||||
if (jsonMatch) {
|
||||
jsonText = jsonMatch[1].trim();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const extracted = JSON.parse(jsonText);
|
||||
|
||||
// Normalize tasks
|
||||
const tasks = (extracted.tasks || []).map((t, i) => ({
|
||||
id: t.id || `T${i + 1}`,
|
||||
title: t.title || 'Untitled task',
|
||||
scope: t.scope || '',
|
||||
action: validateAction(t.action) || 'Implement',
|
||||
description: t.description || t.title,
|
||||
modification_points: t.modification_points || [],
|
||||
implementation: Array.isArray(t.implementation) ? t.implementation : [t.implementation || ''],
|
||||
test: t.test || {},
|
||||
acceptance: {
|
||||
criteria: Array.isArray(t.acceptance) ? t.acceptance : [t.acceptance || ''],
|
||||
verification: t.verification || []
|
||||
},
|
||||
depends_on: t.depends_on || [],
|
||||
priority: t.priority || 3
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
title: extracted.title || 'Extracted Plan',
|
||||
description: extracted.summary || extracted.title,
|
||||
approach: extracted.approach || '',
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
metadata: {
|
||||
source_type: 'markdown',
|
||||
source_path: filePath,
|
||||
extraction_method: 'gemini-ai'
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
// Provide more context for debugging
|
||||
throw new Error(`E005: Failed to extract tasks from markdown. Gemini response was not valid JSON. Error: ${e.message}. Response preview: ${jsonText.substring(0, 200)}...`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function validateAction(action) {
|
||||
const validActions = ['Create', 'Update', 'Implement', 'Refactor', 'Add', 'Delete', 'Configure', 'Test', 'Fix'];
|
||||
if (!action) return null;
|
||||
const normalized = action.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + action.slice(1).toLowerCase();
|
||||
return validActions.includes(normalized) ? normalized : null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Extractor: JSON File
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function extractFromJsonFile(filePath) {
|
||||
const content = Read(filePath);
|
||||
const plan = JSON.parse(content);
|
||||
|
||||
// Detect if it's already solution format or plan format
|
||||
if (plan.tasks && Array.isArray(plan.tasks)) {
|
||||
// Map tasks to normalized format
|
||||
const tasks = plan.tasks.map((t, i) => ({
|
||||
id: t.id || `T${i + 1}`,
|
||||
title: t.title,
|
||||
scope: t.scope || '',
|
||||
action: t.action || 'Implement',
|
||||
description: t.description || t.title,
|
||||
modification_points: t.modification_points || [],
|
||||
implementation: Array.isArray(t.implementation) ? t.implementation : [t.implementation || ''],
|
||||
test: t.test || t.verification || {},
|
||||
acceptance: normalizeAcceptance(t.acceptance),
|
||||
depends_on: t.depends_on || [],
|
||||
priority: t.priority || 3
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
title: plan.summary?.split('.')[0] || plan.title || 'JSON Plan',
|
||||
description: plan.summary || plan.description,
|
||||
approach: plan.approach,
|
||||
tasks: tasks,
|
||||
metadata: {
|
||||
source_type: 'json',
|
||||
source_path: filePath,
|
||||
complexity: plan.complexity,
|
||||
original_metadata: plan._metadata
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
throw new Error('E002: JSON file does not contain valid plan structure (missing tasks array)');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function normalizeAcceptance(acceptance) {
|
||||
if (!acceptance) return { criteria: [], verification: [] };
|
||||
if (typeof acceptance === 'object' && acceptance.criteria) return acceptance;
|
||||
if (Array.isArray(acceptance)) return { criteria: acceptance, verification: [] };
|
||||
return { criteria: [String(acceptance)], verification: [] };
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Normalize Task IDs
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function normalizeTaskIds(tasks) {
|
||||
return tasks.map((t, i) => ({
|
||||
...t,
|
||||
id: `T${i + 1}`,
|
||||
// Also normalize depends_on references
|
||||
depends_on: (t.depends_on || []).map(d => {
|
||||
// Handle various ID formats: IMPL-001, T1, 1, etc.
|
||||
const num = d.match(/\d+/)?.[0];
|
||||
return num ? `T${parseInt(num)}` : d;
|
||||
})
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Resolve Issue (Create or Find)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
let issueId = flags.issue;
|
||||
let existingSolution = null;
|
||||
|
||||
if (issueId) {
|
||||
// Validate issue exists
|
||||
let issueCheck;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
issueCheck = Bash(`ccw issue status ${issueId} --json 2>/dev/null`).trim();
|
||||
if (!issueCheck || issueCheck === '') {
|
||||
throw new Error('empty response');
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`E003: Issue not found: ${issueId}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const issue = JSON.parse(issueCheck);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if issue already has bound solution
|
||||
if (issue.bound_solution_id && !flags.supplement) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`E004: Issue ${issueId} already has bound solution (${issue.bound_solution_id}). Use --supplement to add tasks.`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Load existing solution for supplement mode
|
||||
if (flags.supplement && issue.bound_solution_id) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const solResult = Bash(`ccw issue solution ${issue.bound_solution_id} --json`).trim();
|
||||
existingSolution = JSON.parse(solResult);
|
||||
console.log(`Loaded existing solution with ${existingSolution.tasks.length} tasks`);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to load existing solution: ${e.message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Create new issue via ccw issue create (auto-generates correct ID)
|
||||
// Smart extraction: title from content, priority from complexity
|
||||
const title = extracted.title || 'Converted Plan';
|
||||
const context = extracted.description || extracted.approach || title;
|
||||
|
||||
// Auto-determine priority based on complexity
|
||||
const complexityMap = { high: 2, medium: 3, low: 4 };
|
||||
const priority = complexityMap[extracted.metadata.complexity?.toLowerCase()] || 3;
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Use heredoc to avoid shell escaping issues
|
||||
const createResult = Bash(`ccw issue create << 'EOF'
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": ${JSON.stringify(title)},
|
||||
"context": ${JSON.stringify(context)},
|
||||
"priority": ${priority},
|
||||
"source": "converted"
|
||||
}
|
||||
EOF`).trim();
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse result to get created issue ID
|
||||
const created = JSON.parse(createResult);
|
||||
issueId = created.id;
|
||||
console.log(`Created issue: ${issueId} (priority: ${priority})`);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to create issue: ${e.message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Generate Solution
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Generate solution ID
|
||||
function generateSolutionId(issueId) {
|
||||
const chars = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789';
|
||||
let uid = '';
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
|
||||
uid += chars[Math.floor(Math.random() * chars.length)];
|
||||
}
|
||||
return `SOL-${issueId}-${uid}`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let solution;
|
||||
const solutionId = generateSolutionId(issueId);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags.supplement && existingSolution) {
|
||||
// Supplement mode: merge with existing solution
|
||||
const maxTaskId = Math.max(...existingSolution.tasks.map(t => parseInt(t.id.slice(1))));
|
||||
|
||||
const newTasks = extracted.tasks.map((t, i) => ({
|
||||
...t,
|
||||
id: `T${maxTaskId + i + 1}`
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
solution = {
|
||||
...existingSolution,
|
||||
tasks: [...existingSolution.tasks, ...newTasks],
|
||||
approach: existingSolution.approach + '\n\n[Supplementary] ' + (extracted.approach || ''),
|
||||
updated_at: new Date().toISOString()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`Supplementing: ${existingSolution.tasks.length} existing + ${newTasks.length} new = ${solution.tasks.length} total tasks`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// New solution
|
||||
solution = {
|
||||
id: solutionId,
|
||||
description: extracted.description || extracted.title,
|
||||
approach: extracted.approach,
|
||||
tasks: extracted.tasks,
|
||||
exploration_context: extracted.metadata.exploration_angles ? {
|
||||
exploration_angles: extracted.metadata.exploration_angles
|
||||
} : undefined,
|
||||
analysis: {
|
||||
risk: 'medium',
|
||||
impact: 'medium',
|
||||
complexity: extracted.metadata.complexity?.toLowerCase() || 'medium'
|
||||
},
|
||||
is_bound: false,
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
_conversion_metadata: {
|
||||
source_type: extracted.metadata.source_type,
|
||||
source_path: extracted.metadata.source_path,
|
||||
converted_at: new Date().toISOString()
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Confirm & Persist
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Display preview
|
||||
console.log(`
|
||||
## Conversion Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue**: ${issueId}
|
||||
**Solution**: ${flags.supplement ? existingSolution.id : solutionId}
|
||||
**Tasks**: ${solution.tasks.length}
|
||||
**Mode**: ${flags.supplement ? 'Supplement' : 'New'}
|
||||
|
||||
### Tasks:
|
||||
${solution.tasks.map(t => `- ${t.id}: ${t.title} [${t.action}]`).join('\n')}
|
||||
`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Confirm if not auto mode
|
||||
if (!flags.yes && !flags.y) {
|
||||
const confirm = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Create solution for issue ${issueId} with ${solution.tasks.length} tasks?`,
|
||||
header: 'Confirm',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Yes, create solution', description: 'Create and bind solution' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Cancel', description: 'Abort without changes' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (!confirm.answers?.['Confirm']?.includes('Yes')) {
|
||||
console.log('Cancelled.');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Persist solution (following issue-plan-agent pattern)
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p .workflow/issues/solutions`);
|
||||
|
||||
const solutionFile = `.workflow/issues/solutions/${issueId}.jsonl`;
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags.supplement) {
|
||||
// Supplement mode: update existing solution line atomically
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const existingContent = Read(solutionFile);
|
||||
const lines = existingContent.trim().split('\n').filter(l => l);
|
||||
const updatedLines = lines.map(line => {
|
||||
const sol = JSON.parse(line);
|
||||
if (sol.id === existingSolution.id) {
|
||||
return JSON.stringify(solution);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return line;
|
||||
});
|
||||
// Atomic write: write entire content at once
|
||||
Write({ file_path: solutionFile, content: updatedLines.join('\n') + '\n' });
|
||||
console.log(`✓ Updated solution: ${existingSolution.id}`);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to update solution: ${e.message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Note: No need to rebind - solution is already bound to issue
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// New solution: append to JSONL file (following issue-plan-agent pattern)
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const solutionLine = JSON.stringify(solution);
|
||||
|
||||
// Read existing content, append new line, write atomically
|
||||
const existing = Bash(`test -f "${solutionFile}" && cat "${solutionFile}" || echo ""`).trim();
|
||||
const newContent = existing ? existing + '\n' + solutionLine + '\n' : solutionLine + '\n';
|
||||
Write({ file_path: solutionFile, content: newContent });
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`✓ Created solution: ${solutionId}`);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to write solution: ${e.message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Bind solution to issue
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Bash(`ccw issue bind ${issueId} ${solutionId}`);
|
||||
console.log(`✓ Bound solution to issue`);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
// Cleanup: remove solution file on bind failure
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Bash(`rm -f "${solutionFile}"`);
|
||||
} catch (cleanupError) {
|
||||
// Ignore cleanup errors
|
||||
}
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to bind solution: ${e.message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Update issue status to planned
|
||||
try {
|
||||
Bash(`ccw issue update ${issueId} --status planned`);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Failed to update issue status: ${e.message}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 7: Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
console.log(`
|
||||
## Done
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue**: ${issueId}
|
||||
**Solution**: ${flags.supplement ? existingSolution.id : solutionId}
|
||||
**Tasks**: ${solution.tasks.length}
|
||||
**Status**: planned
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps:
|
||||
- \`/issue:queue\` → Form execution queue
|
||||
- \`ccw issue status ${issueId}\` → View issue details
|
||||
- \`ccw issue solution ${flags.supplement ? existingSolution.id : solutionId}\` → View solution
|
||||
`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Code | Resolution |
|
||||
|-------|------|------------|
|
||||
| Source not found | E001 | Check path exists |
|
||||
| Invalid source format | E002 | Verify file contains valid plan structure |
|
||||
| Issue not found | E003 | Check issue ID or omit --issue to create new |
|
||||
| Solution already bound | E004 | Use --supplement to add tasks |
|
||||
| AI extraction failed | E005 | Check markdown structure, try simpler format |
|
||||
| No tasks extracted | E006 | Source must contain at least 1 task |
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/issue:plan` - Generate solutions from issue exploration
|
||||
- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue from bound solutions
|
||||
- `/issue:execute` - Execute queue with DAG parallelism
|
||||
- `ccw issue status <id>` - View issue details
|
||||
- `ccw issue solution <id>` - View solution details
|
||||
@@ -1,768 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: issue:discover-by-prompt
|
||||
description: Discover issues from user prompt with Gemini-planned iterative multi-agent exploration. Uses ACE semantic search for context gathering and supports cross-module comparison (e.g., frontend vs backend API contracts).
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] <prompt> [--scope=src/**] [--depth=standard|deep] [--max-iterations=5]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Glob(*), Grep(*), mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*), mcp__exa__search(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-continue all iterations, skip confirmations.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue Discovery by Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Discover issues based on user description
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Check if frontend API calls match backend implementations"
|
||||
|
||||
# Compare specific modules
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Verify auth flow consistency between mobile and web clients" --scope=src/auth/**,src/mobile/**
|
||||
|
||||
# Deep exploration with more iterations
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Find all places where error handling is inconsistent" --depth=deep --max-iterations=8
|
||||
|
||||
# Focused backend-frontend contract check
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Compare REST API definitions with frontend fetch calls"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Difference from `/issue:discover`**:
|
||||
- `discover`: Pre-defined perspectives (bug, security, etc.), parallel execution
|
||||
- `discover-by-prompt`: User-driven prompt, Gemini-planned strategy, iterative exploration
|
||||
|
||||
## What & Why
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Concept
|
||||
|
||||
Prompt-driven issue discovery with intelligent planning. Instead of fixed perspectives, this command:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Analyzes user intent** via Gemini to understand what to find
|
||||
2. **Plans exploration strategy** dynamically based on codebase structure
|
||||
3. **Executes iterative multi-agent exploration** with feedback loops
|
||||
4. **Performs cross-module comparison** when detecting comparison intent
|
||||
|
||||
### Value Proposition
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Natural Language Input**: Describe what you want to find, not how to find it
|
||||
2. **Intelligent Planning**: Gemini designs optimal exploration strategy
|
||||
3. **Iterative Refinement**: Each round builds on previous discoveries
|
||||
4. **Cross-Module Analysis**: Compare frontend/backend, mobile/web, old/new implementations
|
||||
5. **Adaptive Exploration**: Adjusts direction based on findings
|
||||
|
||||
### Use Cases
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Example Prompt |
|
||||
|----------|----------------|
|
||||
| API Contract | "Check if frontend calls match backend endpoints" |
|
||||
| Error Handling | "Find inconsistent error handling patterns" |
|
||||
| Migration Gap | "Compare old auth with new auth implementation" |
|
||||
| Feature Parity | "Verify mobile has all web features" |
|
||||
| Schema Drift | "Check if TypeScript types match API responses" |
|
||||
| Integration | "Find mismatches between service A and service B" |
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Prompt Analysis & Initialization
|
||||
├─ Parse user prompt and flags
|
||||
├─ Detect exploration intent (comparison/search/verification)
|
||||
└─ Initialize discovery session
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 1.5: ACE Context Gathering
|
||||
├─ Use ACE semantic search to understand codebase structure
|
||||
├─ Identify relevant modules based on prompt keywords
|
||||
├─ Collect architecture context for Gemini planning
|
||||
└─ Build initial context package
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: Gemini Strategy Planning
|
||||
├─ Feed ACE context + prompt to Gemini CLI
|
||||
├─ Gemini analyzes and generates exploration strategy
|
||||
├─ Create exploration dimensions with search targets
|
||||
├─ Define comparison matrix (if comparison intent)
|
||||
└─ Set success criteria and iteration limits
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: Iterative Agent Exploration (with ACE)
|
||||
├─ Iteration 1: Initial exploration by assigned agents
|
||||
│ ├─ Agent A: ACE search + explore dimension 1
|
||||
│ ├─ Agent B: ACE search + explore dimension 2
|
||||
│ └─ Collect findings, update shared context
|
||||
├─ Iteration 2-N: Refined exploration
|
||||
│ ├─ Analyze previous findings
|
||||
│ ├─ ACE search for related code paths
|
||||
│ ├─ Execute targeted exploration
|
||||
│ └─ Update cumulative findings
|
||||
└─ Termination: Max iterations or convergence
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4: Cross-Analysis & Synthesis
|
||||
├─ Compare findings across dimensions
|
||||
├─ Identify discrepancies and issues
|
||||
├─ Calculate confidence scores
|
||||
└─ Generate issue candidates
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary
|
||||
├─ Convert findings to issue format
|
||||
├─ Write discovery outputs
|
||||
└─ Prompt user for next action
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Exploration Dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
Dimensions are **dynamically generated by Gemini** based on the user prompt. Not limited to predefined categories.
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Prompt | Generated Dimensions |
|
||||
|--------|---------------------|
|
||||
| "Check API contracts" | frontend-calls, backend-handlers |
|
||||
| "Find auth issues" | auth-module (single dimension) |
|
||||
| "Compare old/new implementations" | legacy-code, new-code |
|
||||
| "Audit payment flow" | payment-service, validation, logging |
|
||||
| "Find error handling gaps" | error-handlers, error-types, recovery-logic |
|
||||
|
||||
Gemini analyzes the prompt + ACE context to determine:
|
||||
- How many dimensions are needed (1 to N)
|
||||
- What each dimension should focus on
|
||||
- Whether comparison is needed between dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
### Iteration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Iteration Loop │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ 1. Plan: What to explore this iteration │
|
||||
│ └─ Based on: previous findings + unexplored areas │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 2. Execute: Launch agents for this iteration │
|
||||
│ └─ Each agent: explore → collect → return summary │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 3. Analyze: Process iteration results │
|
||||
│ └─ New findings? Gaps? Contradictions? │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 4. Decide: Continue or terminate │
|
||||
│ └─ Terminate if: max iterations OR convergence OR │
|
||||
│ high confidence on all questions │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Prompt Analysis & Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Step 1: Parse arguments
|
||||
const { prompt, scope, depth, maxIterations } = parseArgs(args);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Generate discovery ID
|
||||
const discoveryId = `DBP-${formatDate(new Date(), 'YYYYMMDD-HHmmss')}`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 3: Create output directory
|
||||
const outputDir = `.workflow/issues/discoveries/${discoveryId}`;
|
||||
await mkdir(outputDir, { recursive: true });
|
||||
await mkdir(`${outputDir}/iterations`, { recursive: true });
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 4: Detect intent type from prompt
|
||||
const intentType = detectIntent(prompt);
|
||||
// Returns: 'comparison' | 'search' | 'verification' | 'audit'
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 5: Initialize discovery state
|
||||
await writeJson(`${outputDir}/discovery-state.json`, {
|
||||
discovery_id: discoveryId,
|
||||
type: 'prompt-driven',
|
||||
prompt: prompt,
|
||||
intent_type: intentType,
|
||||
scope: scope || '**/*',
|
||||
depth: depth || 'standard',
|
||||
max_iterations: maxIterations || 5,
|
||||
phase: 'initialization',
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
iterations: [],
|
||||
cumulative_findings: [],
|
||||
comparison_matrix: null // filled for comparison intent
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1.5: ACE Context Gathering
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Use ACE semantic search to gather codebase context before Gemini planning.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Step 1: Extract keywords from prompt for semantic search
|
||||
const keywords = extractKeywords(prompt);
|
||||
// e.g., "frontend API calls match backend" → ["frontend", "API", "backend", "endpoints"]
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Use ACE to understand codebase structure
|
||||
const aceQueries = [
|
||||
`Project architecture and module structure for ${keywords.join(', ')}`,
|
||||
`Where are ${keywords[0]} implementations located?`,
|
||||
`How does ${keywords.slice(0, 2).join(' ')} work in this codebase?`
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
const aceResults = [];
|
||||
for (const query of aceQueries) {
|
||||
const result = await mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
|
||||
project_root_path: process.cwd(),
|
||||
query: query
|
||||
});
|
||||
aceResults.push({ query, result });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 3: Build context package for Gemini (kept in memory)
|
||||
const aceContext = {
|
||||
prompt_keywords: keywords,
|
||||
codebase_structure: aceResults[0].result,
|
||||
relevant_modules: aceResults.slice(1).map(r => r.result),
|
||||
detected_patterns: extractPatterns(aceResults)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 4: Update state (no separate file)
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
phase: 'context-gathered',
|
||||
ace_context: {
|
||||
queries_executed: aceQueries.length,
|
||||
modules_identified: aceContext.relevant_modules.length
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// aceContext passed to Phase 2 in memory
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**ACE Query Strategy by Intent Type**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Intent | ACE Queries |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| **comparison** | "frontend API calls", "backend API handlers", "API contract definitions" |
|
||||
| **search** | "{keyword} implementations", "{keyword} usage patterns" |
|
||||
| **verification** | "expected behavior for {feature}", "test coverage for {feature}" |
|
||||
| **audit** | "all {category} patterns", "{category} security concerns" |
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Gemini Strategy Planning
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Gemini analyzes user prompt + ACE context to design optimal exploration strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Step 1: Load ACE context gathered in Phase 1.5
|
||||
const aceContext = await readJson(`${outputDir}/ace-context.json`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Build Gemini planning prompt with ACE context
|
||||
const planningPrompt = `
|
||||
PURPOSE: Analyze discovery prompt and create exploration strategy based on codebase context
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
• Parse user intent from prompt: "${prompt}"
|
||||
• Use codebase context to identify specific modules and files to explore
|
||||
• Create exploration dimensions with precise search targets
|
||||
• Define comparison matrix structure (if comparison intent)
|
||||
• Set success criteria and iteration strategy
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @${scope || '**/*'} | Discovery type: ${intentType}
|
||||
|
||||
## Codebase Context (from ACE semantic search)
|
||||
${JSON.stringify(aceContext, null, 2)}
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON exploration plan following exploration-plan-schema.json:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"intent_analysis": { "type": "${intentType}", "primary_question": "...", "sub_questions": [...] },
|
||||
"dimensions": [{ "name": "...", "description": "...", "search_targets": [...], "focus_areas": [...], "agent_prompt": "..." }],
|
||||
"comparison_matrix": { "dimension_a": "...", "dimension_b": "...", "comparison_points": [...] },
|
||||
"success_criteria": [...],
|
||||
"estimated_iterations": N,
|
||||
"termination_conditions": [...]
|
||||
}
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Use ACE context to inform targets | Focus on actionable plan
|
||||
`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 3: Execute Gemini planning
|
||||
Bash({
|
||||
command: `ccw cli -p "${planningPrompt}" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
|
||||
run_in_background: true,
|
||||
timeout: 300000
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 4: Parse Gemini output and validate against schema
|
||||
const explorationPlan = await parseGeminiPlanOutput(geminiResult);
|
||||
validateAgainstSchema(explorationPlan, 'exploration-plan-schema.json');
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 5: Enhance plan with ACE-discovered file paths
|
||||
explorationPlan.dimensions = explorationPlan.dimensions.map(dim => ({
|
||||
...dim,
|
||||
ace_suggested_files: aceContext.relevant_modules
|
||||
.filter(m => m.relevance_to === dim.name)
|
||||
.map(m => m.file_path)
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 6: Update state (plan kept in memory, not persisted)
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
phase: 'planned',
|
||||
exploration_plan: {
|
||||
dimensions_count: explorationPlan.dimensions.length,
|
||||
has_comparison_matrix: !!explorationPlan.comparison_matrix,
|
||||
estimated_iterations: explorationPlan.estimated_iterations
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// explorationPlan passed to Phase 3 in memory
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini Planning Responsibilities**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Responsibility | Input | Output |
|
||||
|----------------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| Intent Analysis | User prompt | type, primary_question, sub_questions |
|
||||
| Dimension Design | ACE context + prompt | dimensions with search_targets |
|
||||
| Comparison Matrix | Intent type + modules | comparison_points (if applicable) |
|
||||
| Iteration Strategy | Depth setting | estimated_iterations, termination_conditions |
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini Planning Output Schema**:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"intent_analysis": {
|
||||
"type": "comparison|search|verification|audit",
|
||||
"primary_question": "string",
|
||||
"sub_questions": ["string"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dimensions": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "frontend",
|
||||
"description": "Client-side API calls and error handling",
|
||||
"search_targets": ["src/api/**", "src/hooks/**"],
|
||||
"focus_areas": ["fetch calls", "error boundaries", "response parsing"],
|
||||
"agent_prompt": "Explore frontend API consumption patterns..."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "backend",
|
||||
"description": "Server-side API implementations",
|
||||
"search_targets": ["src/server/**", "src/routes/**"],
|
||||
"focus_areas": ["endpoint handlers", "response schemas", "error responses"],
|
||||
"agent_prompt": "Explore backend API implementations..."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"comparison_matrix": {
|
||||
"dimension_a": "frontend",
|
||||
"dimension_b": "backend",
|
||||
"comparison_points": [
|
||||
{"aspect": "endpoints", "frontend_check": "fetch URLs", "backend_check": "route paths"},
|
||||
{"aspect": "methods", "frontend_check": "HTTP methods used", "backend_check": "methods accepted"},
|
||||
{"aspect": "payloads", "frontend_check": "request body structure", "backend_check": "expected schema"},
|
||||
{"aspect": "responses", "frontend_check": "response parsing", "backend_check": "response format"},
|
||||
{"aspect": "errors", "frontend_check": "error handling", "backend_check": "error responses"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"success_criteria": [
|
||||
"All API endpoints mapped between frontend and backend",
|
||||
"Discrepancies identified with file:line references",
|
||||
"Each finding includes remediation suggestion"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"estimated_iterations": 3,
|
||||
"termination_conditions": [
|
||||
"All comparison points verified",
|
||||
"No new findings in last iteration",
|
||||
"Confidence > 0.8 on primary question"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Iterative Agent Exploration (with ACE)
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Multi-agent iterative exploration using ACE for semantic search within each iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
let iteration = 0;
|
||||
let cumulativeFindings = [];
|
||||
let sharedContext = { aceDiscoveries: [], crossReferences: [] };
|
||||
let shouldContinue = true;
|
||||
|
||||
while (shouldContinue && iteration < maxIterations) {
|
||||
iteration++;
|
||||
const iterationDir = `${outputDir}/iterations/${iteration}`;
|
||||
await mkdir(iterationDir, { recursive: true });
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 1: ACE-assisted iteration planning
|
||||
// Use previous findings to guide ACE queries for this iteration
|
||||
const iterationAceQueries = iteration === 1
|
||||
? explorationPlan.dimensions.map(d => d.focus_areas[0]) // Initial queries from plan
|
||||
: deriveQueriesFromFindings(cumulativeFindings); // Follow-up queries from findings
|
||||
|
||||
// Execute ACE searches to find related code
|
||||
const iterationAceResults = [];
|
||||
for (const query of iterationAceQueries) {
|
||||
const result = await mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
|
||||
project_root_path: process.cwd(),
|
||||
query: `${query} in ${explorationPlan.scope}`
|
||||
});
|
||||
iterationAceResults.push({ query, result });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Update shared context with ACE discoveries
|
||||
sharedContext.aceDiscoveries.push(...iterationAceResults);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Plan this iteration based on ACE results
|
||||
const iterationPlan = planIteration(iteration, explorationPlan, cumulativeFindings, iterationAceResults);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 3: Launch dimension agents with ACE context
|
||||
const agentPromises = iterationPlan.dimensions.map(dimension =>
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: `Explore ${dimension.name} (iteration ${iteration})`,
|
||||
prompt: buildDimensionPromptWithACE(dimension, iteration, cumulativeFindings, iterationAceResults, iterationDir)
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for iteration agents
|
||||
const iterationResults = await Promise.all(agentPromises);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 4: Collect and analyze iteration findings
|
||||
const iterationFindings = await collectIterationFindings(iterationDir, iterationPlan.dimensions);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 5: Cross-reference findings between dimensions
|
||||
if (iterationPlan.dimensions.length > 1) {
|
||||
const crossRefs = findCrossReferences(iterationFindings, iterationPlan.dimensions);
|
||||
sharedContext.crossReferences.push(...crossRefs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cumulativeFindings.push(...iterationFindings);
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 6: Decide whether to continue
|
||||
const convergenceCheck = checkConvergence(iterationFindings, cumulativeFindings, explorationPlan);
|
||||
shouldContinue = !convergenceCheck.converged;
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 7: Update state (iteration summary embedded in state)
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
iterations: [...state.iterations, {
|
||||
number: iteration,
|
||||
findings_count: iterationFindings.length,
|
||||
ace_queries: iterationAceQueries.length,
|
||||
cross_references: sharedContext.crossReferences.length,
|
||||
new_discoveries: convergenceCheck.newDiscoveries,
|
||||
confidence: convergenceCheck.confidence,
|
||||
continued: shouldContinue
|
||||
}],
|
||||
cumulative_findings: cumulativeFindings
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**ACE in Iteration Loop**:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Iteration N
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─→ ACE Search (based on previous findings)
|
||||
│ └─ Query: "related code paths for {finding.category}"
|
||||
│ └─ Result: Additional files to explore
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─→ Agent Exploration (with ACE context)
|
||||
│ └─ Agent receives: dimension targets + ACE suggestions
|
||||
│ └─ Agent can call ACE for deeper search
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─→ Cross-Reference Analysis
|
||||
│ └─ Compare findings between dimensions
|
||||
│ └─ Identify discrepancies
|
||||
│
|
||||
└─→ Convergence Check
|
||||
└─ New findings? Continue
|
||||
└─ No new findings? Terminate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Dimension Agent Prompt Template (with ACE)**:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function buildDimensionPromptWithACE(dimension, iteration, previousFindings, aceResults, outputDir) {
|
||||
// Filter ACE results relevant to this dimension
|
||||
const relevantAceResults = aceResults.filter(r =>
|
||||
r.query.includes(dimension.name) || dimension.focus_areas.some(fa => r.query.includes(fa))
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
return `
|
||||
## Task Objective
|
||||
Explore ${dimension.name} dimension for issue discovery (Iteration ${iteration})
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
- Dimension: ${dimension.name}
|
||||
- Description: ${dimension.description}
|
||||
- Search Targets: ${dimension.search_targets.join(', ')}
|
||||
- Focus Areas: ${dimension.focus_areas.join(', ')}
|
||||
|
||||
## ACE Semantic Search Results (Pre-gathered)
|
||||
The following files/code sections were identified by ACE as relevant to this dimension:
|
||||
${JSON.stringify(relevantAceResults.map(r => ({ query: r.query, files: r.result.slice(0, 5) })), null, 2)}
|
||||
|
||||
**Use ACE for deeper exploration**: You have access to mcp__ace-tool__search_context.
|
||||
When you find something interesting, use ACE to find related code:
|
||||
- mcp__ace-tool__search_context({ project_root_path: ".", query: "related to {finding}" })
|
||||
|
||||
${iteration > 1 ? `
|
||||
## Previous Findings to Build Upon
|
||||
${summarizePreviousFindings(previousFindings, dimension.name)}
|
||||
|
||||
## This Iteration Focus
|
||||
- Explore areas not yet covered (check ACE results for new files)
|
||||
- Verify/deepen previous findings
|
||||
- Follow leads from previous discoveries
|
||||
- Use ACE to find cross-references between dimensions
|
||||
` : ''}
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
|
||||
1. Read exploration plan: ${outputDir}/../exploration-plan.json
|
||||
2. Read schema: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-finding-schema.json
|
||||
3. Review ACE results above for starting points
|
||||
4. Explore files identified by ACE
|
||||
|
||||
## Exploration Instructions
|
||||
${dimension.agent_prompt}
|
||||
|
||||
## ACE Usage Guidelines
|
||||
- Use ACE when you need to find:
|
||||
- Where a function/class is used
|
||||
- Related implementations in other modules
|
||||
- Cross-module dependencies
|
||||
- Similar patterns elsewhere in codebase
|
||||
- Query format: Natural language, be specific
|
||||
- Example: "Where is UserService.authenticate called from?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Write JSON file**: ${outputDir}/${dimension.name}.json
|
||||
Follow discovery-finding-schema.json:
|
||||
- findings: [{id, title, category, description, file, line, snippet, confidence, related_dimension}]
|
||||
- coverage: {files_explored, areas_covered, areas_remaining}
|
||||
- leads: [{description, suggested_search}] // for next iteration
|
||||
- ace_queries_used: [{query, result_count}] // track ACE usage
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Return summary**:
|
||||
- Total findings this iteration
|
||||
- Key discoveries
|
||||
- ACE queries that revealed important code
|
||||
- Recommended next exploration areas
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
- [ ] JSON written to ${outputDir}/${dimension.name}.json
|
||||
- [ ] Each finding has file:line reference
|
||||
- [ ] ACE used for cross-references where applicable
|
||||
- [ ] Coverage report included
|
||||
- [ ] Leads for next iteration identified
|
||||
`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Cross-Analysis & Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// For comparison intent, perform cross-analysis
|
||||
if (intentType === 'comparison' && explorationPlan.comparison_matrix) {
|
||||
const comparisonResults = [];
|
||||
|
||||
for (const point of explorationPlan.comparison_matrix.comparison_points) {
|
||||
const dimensionAFindings = cumulativeFindings.filter(f =>
|
||||
f.related_dimension === explorationPlan.comparison_matrix.dimension_a &&
|
||||
f.category.includes(point.aspect)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const dimensionBFindings = cumulativeFindings.filter(f =>
|
||||
f.related_dimension === explorationPlan.comparison_matrix.dimension_b &&
|
||||
f.category.includes(point.aspect)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Compare and find discrepancies
|
||||
const discrepancies = findDiscrepancies(dimensionAFindings, dimensionBFindings, point);
|
||||
|
||||
comparisonResults.push({
|
||||
aspect: point.aspect,
|
||||
dimension_a_count: dimensionAFindings.length,
|
||||
dimension_b_count: dimensionBFindings.length,
|
||||
discrepancies: discrepancies,
|
||||
match_rate: calculateMatchRate(dimensionAFindings, dimensionBFindings)
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Write comparison analysis
|
||||
await writeJson(`${outputDir}/comparison-analysis.json`, {
|
||||
matrix: explorationPlan.comparison_matrix,
|
||||
results: comparisonResults,
|
||||
summary: {
|
||||
total_discrepancies: comparisonResults.reduce((sum, r) => sum + r.discrepancies.length, 0),
|
||||
overall_match_rate: average(comparisonResults.map(r => r.match_rate)),
|
||||
critical_mismatches: comparisonResults.filter(r => r.match_rate < 0.5)
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Prioritize all findings
|
||||
const prioritizedFindings = prioritizeFindings(cumulativeFindings, explorationPlan);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Convert high-confidence findings to issues
|
||||
const issueWorthy = prioritizedFindings.filter(f =>
|
||||
f.confidence >= 0.7 || f.priority === 'critical' || f.priority === 'high'
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const issues = issueWorthy.map(finding => ({
|
||||
id: `ISS-${discoveryId}-${finding.id}`,
|
||||
title: finding.title,
|
||||
description: finding.description,
|
||||
source: {
|
||||
discovery_id: discoveryId,
|
||||
finding_id: finding.id,
|
||||
dimension: finding.related_dimension
|
||||
},
|
||||
file: finding.file,
|
||||
line: finding.line,
|
||||
priority: finding.priority,
|
||||
category: finding.category,
|
||||
suggested_fix: finding.suggested_fix,
|
||||
confidence: finding.confidence,
|
||||
status: 'discovered',
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString()
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// Write issues
|
||||
await writeJsonl(`${outputDir}/discovery-issues.jsonl`, issues);
|
||||
|
||||
// Update final state (summary embedded in state, no separate file)
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
phase: 'complete',
|
||||
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
results: {
|
||||
total_iterations: iteration,
|
||||
total_findings: cumulativeFindings.length,
|
||||
issues_generated: issues.length,
|
||||
comparison_match_rate: comparisonResults
|
||||
? average(comparisonResults.map(r => r.match_rate))
|
||||
: null
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Prompt user for next action
|
||||
await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Discovery complete: ${issues.length} issues from ${cumulativeFindings.length} findings across ${iteration} iterations. What next?`,
|
||||
header: "Next Step",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Export to Issues (Recommended)", description: `Export ${issues.length} issues for planning` },
|
||||
{ label: "Review Details", description: "View comparison analysis and iteration details" },
|
||||
{ label: "Run Deeper", description: "Continue with more iterations" },
|
||||
{ label: "Skip", description: "Complete without exporting" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output File Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/issues/discoveries/
|
||||
└── {DBP-YYYYMMDD-HHmmss}/
|
||||
├── discovery-state.json # Session state with iteration tracking
|
||||
├── iterations/
|
||||
│ ├── 1/
|
||||
│ │ └── {dimension}.json # Dimension findings
|
||||
│ ├── 2/
|
||||
│ │ └── {dimension}.json
|
||||
│ └── ...
|
||||
├── comparison-analysis.json # Cross-dimension comparison (if applicable)
|
||||
└── discovery-issues.jsonl # Generated issue candidates
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Simplified Design**:
|
||||
- ACE context and Gemini plan kept in memory, not persisted
|
||||
- Iteration summaries embedded in state
|
||||
- No separate summary.md (state.json contains all needed info)
|
||||
|
||||
## Schema References
|
||||
|
||||
| Schema | Path | Used By |
|
||||
|--------|------|---------|
|
||||
| **Discovery State** | `discovery-state-schema.json` | Orchestrator (state tracking) |
|
||||
| **Discovery Finding** | `discovery-finding-schema.json` | Dimension agents (output) |
|
||||
| **Exploration Plan** | `exploration-plan-schema.json` | Gemini output validation (memory only) |
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Options
|
||||
|
||||
| Flag | Default | Description |
|
||||
|------|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| `--scope` | `**/*` | File pattern to explore |
|
||||
| `--depth` | `standard` | `standard` (3 iterations) or `deep` (5+ iterations) |
|
||||
| `--max-iterations` | 5 | Maximum exploration iterations |
|
||||
| `--tool` | `gemini` | Planning tool (gemini/qwen) |
|
||||
| `--plan-only` | `false` | Stop after Phase 2 (Gemini planning), show plan for user review |
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 1: Single Module Deep Dive
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Find all potential issues in the auth module" --scope=src/auth/**
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini plans** (single dimension):
|
||||
- Dimension: auth-module
|
||||
- Focus: security vulnerabilities, edge cases, error handling, test gaps
|
||||
|
||||
**Iterations**: 2-3 (until no new findings)
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 2: API Contract Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Check if API calls match implementations" --scope=src/**
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini plans** (comparison):
|
||||
- Dimension 1: api-consumers (fetch calls, hooks, services)
|
||||
- Dimension 2: api-providers (handlers, routes, controllers)
|
||||
- Comparison matrix: endpoints, methods, payloads, responses
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 3: Multi-Module Audit
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Audit the payment flow for issues" --scope=src/payment/**
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Gemini plans** (multi-dimension):
|
||||
- Dimension 1: payment-logic (calculations, state transitions)
|
||||
- Dimension 2: validation (input checks, business rules)
|
||||
- Dimension 3: error-handling (failure modes, recovery)
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 4: Plan Only Mode
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:discover-by-prompt "Find inconsistent patterns" --plan-only
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Stops after Gemini planning, outputs:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Gemini Plan:
|
||||
- Intent: search
|
||||
- Dimensions: 2 (pattern-definitions, pattern-usages)
|
||||
- Estimated iterations: 3
|
||||
|
||||
Continue with exploration? [Y/n]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# After discovery, plan solutions
|
||||
/issue:plan DBP-001-01,DBP-001-02
|
||||
|
||||
# View all discoveries
|
||||
/issue:manage
|
||||
|
||||
# Standard perspective-based discovery
|
||||
/issue:discover src/auth/** --perspectives=security,bug
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Be Specific in Prompts**: More specific prompts lead to better Gemini planning
|
||||
2. **Scope Appropriately**: Narrow scope for focused comparison, wider for audits
|
||||
3. **Review Exploration Plan**: Check `exploration-plan.json` before long explorations
|
||||
4. **Use Standard Depth First**: Start with standard, go deep only if needed
|
||||
5. **Combine with `/issue:discover`**: Use prompt-based for comparisons, perspective-based for audits
|
||||
@@ -1,472 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: issue:discover
|
||||
description: Discover potential issues from multiple perspectives (bug, UX, test, quality, security, performance, maintainability, best-practices) using CLI explore. Supports Exa external research for security and best-practices perspectives.
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] <path-pattern> [--perspectives=bug,ux,...] [--external]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Glob(*), Grep(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-select all perspectives, skip confirmations.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue Discovery Command
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Discover issues in specific module (interactive perspective selection)
|
||||
/issue:discover src/auth/**
|
||||
|
||||
# Discover with specific perspectives
|
||||
/issue:discover src/payment/** --perspectives=bug,security,test
|
||||
|
||||
# Discover with external research for all perspectives
|
||||
/issue:discover src/api/** --external
|
||||
|
||||
# Discover in multiple modules
|
||||
/issue:discover src/auth/**,src/payment/**
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Discovery Scope**: Specified modules/files only
|
||||
**Output Directory**: `.workflow/issues/discoveries/{discovery-id}/`
|
||||
**Available Perspectives**: bug, ux, test, quality, security, performance, maintainability, best-practices
|
||||
**Exa Integration**: Auto-enabled for security and best-practices perspectives
|
||||
**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
|
||||
|
||||
## What & Why
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Concept
|
||||
Multi-perspective issue discovery orchestrator that explores code from different angles to identify potential bugs, UX improvements, test gaps, and other actionable items. Unlike code review (which assesses existing code quality), discovery focuses on **finding opportunities for improvement and potential problems**.
|
||||
|
||||
**vs Code Review**:
|
||||
- **Code Review** (`review-module-cycle`): Evaluates code quality against standards
|
||||
- **Issue Discovery** (`issue:discover`): Finds actionable issues, bugs, and improvement opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
### Value Proposition
|
||||
1. **Proactive Issue Detection**: Find problems before they become bugs
|
||||
2. **Multi-Perspective Analysis**: Each perspective surfaces different types of issues
|
||||
3. **External Benchmarking**: Compare against industry best practices via Exa
|
||||
4. **Direct Issue Integration**: Discoveries can be exported to issue tracker
|
||||
5. **Dashboard Management**: View, filter, and export discoveries via CCW dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
|
||||
└─ Parse target pattern, create session, initialize output structure
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: Interactive Perspective Selection
|
||||
└─ AskUserQuestion for perspective selection (or use --perspectives)
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: Parallel Perspective Analysis
|
||||
├─ Launch N @cli-explore-agent instances (one per perspective)
|
||||
├─ Security & Best-Practices auto-trigger Exa research
|
||||
├─ Agent writes perspective JSON, returns summary
|
||||
└─ Update discovery-progress.json
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4: Aggregation & Prioritization
|
||||
├─ Collect agent return summaries
|
||||
├─ Load perspective JSON files
|
||||
├─ Merge findings, deduplicate by file+line
|
||||
└─ Calculate priority scores
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary
|
||||
├─ Convert high-priority discoveries to issue format
|
||||
├─ Write to discovery-issues.jsonl
|
||||
├─ Generate single summary.md from agent returns
|
||||
└─ Update discovery-state.json to complete
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 6: User Action Prompt
|
||||
└─ AskUserQuestion for next step (export/dashboard/skip)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Perspectives
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Perspectives
|
||||
|
||||
| Perspective | Focus | Categories | Exa |
|
||||
|-------------|-------|------------|-----|
|
||||
| **bug** | Potential Bugs | edge-case, null-check, resource-leak, race-condition, boundary, exception-handling | - |
|
||||
| **ux** | User Experience | error-message, loading-state, feedback, accessibility, interaction, consistency | - |
|
||||
| **test** | Test Coverage | missing-test, edge-case-test, integration-gap, coverage-hole, assertion-quality | - |
|
||||
| **quality** | Code Quality | complexity, duplication, naming, documentation, code-smell, readability | - |
|
||||
| **security** | Security Issues | injection, auth, encryption, input-validation, data-exposure, access-control | ✓ |
|
||||
| **performance** | Performance | n-plus-one, memory-usage, caching, algorithm, blocking-operation, resource | - |
|
||||
| **maintainability** | Maintainability | coupling, cohesion, tech-debt, extensibility, module-boundary, interface-design | - |
|
||||
| **best-practices** | Best Practices | convention, pattern, framework-usage, anti-pattern, industry-standard | ✓ |
|
||||
|
||||
### Interactive Perspective Selection
|
||||
|
||||
When no `--perspectives` flag is provided, the command uses AskUserQuestion:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Select primary discovery focus:",
|
||||
header: "Focus",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Bug + Test + Quality", description: "Quick scan: potential bugs, test gaps, code quality (Recommended)" },
|
||||
{ label: "Security + Performance", description: "System audit: security issues, performance bottlenecks" },
|
||||
{ label: "Maintainability + Best-practices", description: "Long-term health: coupling, tech debt, conventions" },
|
||||
{ label: "Full analysis", description: "All 7 perspectives (comprehensive, takes longer)" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Combinations**:
|
||||
- Quick scan: bug, test, quality
|
||||
- Full analysis: all perspectives
|
||||
- Security audit: security, bug, quality
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Step 1: Parse target pattern and resolve files
|
||||
const resolvedFiles = await expandGlobPattern(targetPattern);
|
||||
if (resolvedFiles.length === 0) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`No files matched pattern: ${targetPattern}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Generate discovery ID
|
||||
const discoveryId = `DSC-${formatDate(new Date(), 'YYYYMMDD-HHmmss')}`;
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 3: Create output directory
|
||||
const outputDir = `.workflow/issues/discoveries/${discoveryId}`;
|
||||
await mkdir(outputDir, { recursive: true });
|
||||
await mkdir(`${outputDir}/perspectives`, { recursive: true });
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 4: Initialize unified discovery state (merged state+progress)
|
||||
await writeJson(`${outputDir}/discovery-state.json`, {
|
||||
discovery_id: discoveryId,
|
||||
target_pattern: targetPattern,
|
||||
phase: "initialization",
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
target: { files_count: { total: resolvedFiles.length }, project: {} },
|
||||
perspectives: [], // filled after selection: [{name, status, findings}]
|
||||
external_research: { enabled: false, completed: false },
|
||||
results: { total_findings: 0, issues_generated: 0, priority_distribution: {} }
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2: Perspective Selection**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Check for --perspectives flag
|
||||
let selectedPerspectives = [];
|
||||
|
||||
if (args.perspectives) {
|
||||
selectedPerspectives = args.perspectives.split(',').map(p => p.trim());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Interactive selection via AskUserQuestion
|
||||
const response = await AskUserQuestion({...});
|
||||
selectedPerspectives = parseSelectedPerspectives(response);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate and update state
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
'metadata.perspectives': selectedPerspectives,
|
||||
phase: 'parallel'
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 3: Parallel Perspective Analysis**
|
||||
|
||||
Launch N agents in parallel (one per selected perspective):
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Launch agents in parallel - agents write JSON and return summary
|
||||
const agentPromises = selectedPerspectives.map(perspective =>
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: `Discover ${perspective} issues`,
|
||||
prompt: buildPerspectivePrompt(perspective, discoveryId, resolvedFiles, outputDir)
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for all agents - collect their return summaries
|
||||
const results = await Promise.all(agentPromises);
|
||||
// results contain agent summaries for final report
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 4: Aggregation & Prioritization**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Load all perspective JSON files written by agents
|
||||
const allFindings = [];
|
||||
for (const perspective of selectedPerspectives) {
|
||||
const jsonPath = `${outputDir}/perspectives/${perspective}.json`;
|
||||
if (await fileExists(jsonPath)) {
|
||||
const data = await readJson(jsonPath);
|
||||
allFindings.push(...data.findings.map(f => ({ ...f, perspective })));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Deduplicate and prioritize
|
||||
const prioritizedFindings = deduplicateAndPrioritize(allFindings);
|
||||
|
||||
// Update unified state
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
phase: 'aggregation',
|
||||
'results.total_findings': prioritizedFindings.length,
|
||||
'results.priority_distribution': countByPriority(prioritizedFindings)
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Convert high-priority findings to issues
|
||||
const issueWorthy = prioritizedFindings.filter(f =>
|
||||
f.priority === 'critical' || f.priority === 'high' || f.priority_score >= 0.7
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Write discovery-issues.jsonl
|
||||
await writeJsonl(`${outputDir}/discovery-issues.jsonl`, issues);
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate single summary.md from agent return summaries
|
||||
// Orchestrator briefly summarizes what agents returned (NO detailed reports)
|
||||
await writeSummaryFromAgentReturns(outputDir, results, prioritizedFindings, issues);
|
||||
|
||||
// Update final state
|
||||
await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
|
||||
phase: 'complete',
|
||||
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
'results.issues_generated': issues.length
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 6: User Action Prompt**
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Prompt user for next action based on discovery results
|
||||
const hasHighPriority = issues.some(i => i.priority === 'critical' || i.priority === 'high');
|
||||
const hasMediumFindings = prioritizedFindings.some(f => f.priority === 'medium');
|
||||
|
||||
await AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Discovery complete: ${issues.length} issues generated, ${prioritizedFindings.length} total findings. What would you like to do next?`,
|
||||
header: "Next Step",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: hasHighPriority ? [
|
||||
{ label: "Export to Issues (Recommended)", description: `${issues.length} high-priority issues found - export to issue tracker for planning` },
|
||||
{ label: "Open Dashboard", description: "Review findings in ccw view before exporting" },
|
||||
{ label: "Skip", description: "Complete discovery without exporting" }
|
||||
] : hasMediumFindings ? [
|
||||
{ label: "Open Dashboard (Recommended)", description: "Review medium-priority findings in ccw view to decide which to export" },
|
||||
{ label: "Export to Issues", description: `Export ${issues.length} issues to tracker` },
|
||||
{ label: "Skip", description: "Complete discovery without exporting" }
|
||||
] : [
|
||||
{ label: "Skip (Recommended)", description: "No significant issues found - complete discovery" },
|
||||
{ label: "Open Dashboard", description: "Review all findings in ccw view" },
|
||||
{ label: "Export to Issues", description: `Export ${issues.length} issues anyway` }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Handle response
|
||||
if (response === "Export to Issues") {
|
||||
// Append to issues.jsonl
|
||||
await appendJsonl('.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl', issues);
|
||||
console.log(`Exported ${issues.length} issues. Run /issue:plan to continue.`);
|
||||
} else if (response === "Open Dashboard") {
|
||||
console.log('Run `ccw view` and navigate to Issues > Discovery to manage findings.');
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output File Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/issues/discoveries/
|
||||
├── index.json # Discovery session index
|
||||
└── {discovery-id}/
|
||||
├── discovery-state.json # Unified state (merged state+progress)
|
||||
├── perspectives/
|
||||
│ └── {perspective}.json # Per-perspective findings
|
||||
├── external-research.json # Exa research results (if enabled)
|
||||
├── discovery-issues.jsonl # Generated candidate issues
|
||||
└── summary.md # Single summary (from agent returns)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema References
|
||||
|
||||
**External Schema Files** (agent MUST read and follow exactly):
|
||||
|
||||
| Schema | Path | Purpose |
|
||||
|--------|------|---------|
|
||||
| **Discovery State** | `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-state-schema.json` | Session state machine |
|
||||
| **Discovery Finding** | `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-finding-schema.json` | Perspective analysis results |
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent Invocation Template
|
||||
|
||||
**Perspective Analysis Agent**:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: `Discover ${perspective} issues`,
|
||||
prompt: `
|
||||
## Task Objective
|
||||
Discover potential ${perspective} issues in specified module files.
|
||||
|
||||
## Discovery Context
|
||||
- Discovery ID: ${discoveryId}
|
||||
- Perspective: ${perspective}
|
||||
- Target Pattern: ${targetPattern}
|
||||
- Resolved Files: ${resolvedFiles.length} files
|
||||
- Output Directory: ${outputDir}
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
|
||||
1. Read discovery state: ${outputDir}/discovery-state.json
|
||||
2. Read schema: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-finding-schema.json
|
||||
3. Analyze target files for ${perspective} concerns
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Write JSON file**: ${outputDir}/perspectives/${perspective}.json
|
||||
- Follow discovery-finding-schema.json exactly
|
||||
- Each finding: id, title, priority, category, description, file, line, snippet, suggested_issue, confidence
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Return summary** (DO NOT write report file):
|
||||
- Return a brief text summary of findings
|
||||
- Include: total findings, priority breakdown, key issues
|
||||
- This summary will be used by orchestrator for final report
|
||||
|
||||
## Perspective-Specific Guidance
|
||||
${getPerspectiveGuidance(perspective)}
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
- [ ] JSON written to ${outputDir}/perspectives/${perspective}.json
|
||||
- [ ] Summary returned with findings count and key issues
|
||||
- [ ] Each finding includes actionable suggested_issue
|
||||
- [ ] Priority uses lowercase enum: critical/high/medium/low
|
||||
`
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Exa Research Agent** (for security and best-practices):
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: `External research for ${perspective} via Exa`,
|
||||
prompt: `
|
||||
## Task Objective
|
||||
Research industry best practices for ${perspective} using Exa search
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Steps
|
||||
1. Read project tech stack: .workflow/project-tech.json
|
||||
2. Use Exa to search for best practices
|
||||
3. Synthesize findings relevant to this project
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Write JSON file**: ${outputDir}/external-research.json
|
||||
- Include sources, key_findings, gap_analysis, recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Return summary** (DO NOT write report file):
|
||||
- Brief summary of external research findings
|
||||
- Key recommendations for the project
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
- [ ] JSON written to ${outputDir}/external-research.json
|
||||
- [ ] Summary returned with key recommendations
|
||||
- [ ] Findings are relevant to project's tech stack
|
||||
`
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Perspective Guidance Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function getPerspectiveGuidance(perspective) {
|
||||
const guidance = {
|
||||
bug: `
|
||||
Focus: Null checks, edge cases, resource leaks, race conditions, boundary conditions, exception handling
|
||||
Priority: Critical=data corruption/crash, High=malfunction, Medium=edge case issues, Low=minor
|
||||
`,
|
||||
ux: `
|
||||
Focus: Error messages, loading states, feedback, accessibility, interaction patterns, form validation
|
||||
Priority: Critical=inaccessible, High=confusing, Medium=inconsistent, Low=cosmetic
|
||||
`,
|
||||
test: `
|
||||
Focus: Missing unit tests, edge case coverage, integration gaps, assertion quality, test isolation
|
||||
Priority: Critical=no security tests, High=no core logic tests, Medium=weak coverage, Low=minor gaps
|
||||
`,
|
||||
quality: `
|
||||
Focus: Complexity, duplication, naming, documentation, code smells, readability
|
||||
Priority: Critical=unmaintainable, High=significant issues, Medium=naming/docs, Low=minor refactoring
|
||||
`,
|
||||
security: `
|
||||
Focus: Input validation, auth/authz, injection, XSS/CSRF, data exposure, access control
|
||||
Priority: Critical=auth bypass/injection, High=missing authz, Medium=weak validation, Low=headers
|
||||
`,
|
||||
performance: `
|
||||
Focus: N+1 queries, memory leaks, caching, algorithm efficiency, blocking operations
|
||||
Priority: Critical=memory leaks, High=N+1/inefficient, Medium=missing cache, Low=minor optimization
|
||||
`,
|
||||
maintainability: `
|
||||
Focus: Coupling, interface design, tech debt, extensibility, module boundaries, configuration
|
||||
Priority: Critical=unrelated code changes, High=unclear boundaries, Medium=coupling, Low=refactoring
|
||||
`,
|
||||
'best-practices': `
|
||||
Focus: Framework conventions, language patterns, anti-patterns, deprecated APIs, coding standards
|
||||
Priority: Critical=anti-patterns causing bugs, High=convention violations, Medium=style, Low=cosmetic
|
||||
`
|
||||
};
|
||||
return guidance[perspective] || 'General code discovery analysis';
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Dashboard Integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Viewing Discoveries
|
||||
|
||||
Open CCW dashboard to manage discoveries:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ccw view
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Navigate to **Issues > Discovery** to:
|
||||
- View all discovery sessions
|
||||
- Filter findings by perspective and priority
|
||||
- Preview finding details
|
||||
- Select and export findings as issues
|
||||
|
||||
### Exporting to Issues
|
||||
|
||||
From the dashboard, select findings and click "Export as Issues" to:
|
||||
1. Convert discoveries to standard issue format
|
||||
2. Append to `.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl`
|
||||
3. Set status to `registered`
|
||||
4. Continue with `/issue:plan` workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# After discovery, plan solutions for exported issues
|
||||
/issue:plan DSC-001,DSC-002,DSC-003
|
||||
|
||||
# Or use interactive management
|
||||
/issue:manage
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Start Focused**: Begin with specific modules rather than entire codebase
|
||||
2. **Use Quick Scan First**: Start with bug, test, quality for fast results
|
||||
3. **Review Before Export**: Not all discoveries warrant issues - use dashboard to filter
|
||||
4. **Combine Perspectives**: Run related perspectives together (e.g., security + bug)
|
||||
5. **Enable Exa for New Tech**: When using unfamiliar frameworks, enable external research
|
||||
@@ -1,608 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: execute
|
||||
description: Execute queue with DAG-based parallel orchestration (one commit per solution)
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] --queue <queue-id> [--worktree [<existing-path>]]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-confirm execution, use recommended settings.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue Execute Command (/issue:execute)
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Minimal orchestrator that dispatches **solution IDs** to executors. Each executor receives a complete solution with all its tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Design Principles:**
|
||||
- `queue dag` → returns parallel batches with solution IDs (S-1, S-2, ...)
|
||||
- `detail <id>` → READ-ONLY solution fetch (returns full solution with all tasks)
|
||||
- `done <id>` → update solution completion status
|
||||
- No race conditions: status changes only via `done`
|
||||
- **Executor handles all tasks within a solution sequentially**
|
||||
- **Single worktree for entire queue**: One worktree isolates ALL queue execution from main workspace
|
||||
|
||||
## Queue ID Requirement (MANDATORY)
|
||||
|
||||
**Queue ID is REQUIRED.** You MUST specify which queue to execute via `--queue <queue-id>`.
|
||||
|
||||
### If Queue ID Not Provided
|
||||
|
||||
When `--queue` parameter is missing, you MUST:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **List available queues** by running:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const result = Bash('ccw issue queue list --brief --json');
|
||||
const index = JSON.parse(result);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Display available queues** to user:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Available Queues:
|
||||
ID Status Progress Issues
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
→ QUE-20251215-001 active 3/10 ISS-001, ISS-002
|
||||
QUE-20251210-002 active 0/5 ISS-003
|
||||
QUE-20251205-003 completed 8/8 ISS-004
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Stop and ask user** to specify which queue to execute:
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Which queue would you like to execute?",
|
||||
header: "Queue",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: index.queues
|
||||
.filter(q => q.status === 'active')
|
||||
.map(q => ({
|
||||
label: q.id,
|
||||
description: `${q.status}, ${q.completed_solutions || 0}/${q.total_solutions || 0} completed, Issues: ${q.issue_ids.join(', ')}`
|
||||
}))
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **After user selection**, continue execution with the selected queue ID.
|
||||
|
||||
**DO NOT auto-select queues.** Explicit user confirmation is required to prevent accidental execution of wrong queue.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:execute --queue QUE-xxx # Execute specific queue (REQUIRED)
|
||||
/issue:execute --queue QUE-xxx --worktree # Execute in isolated worktree
|
||||
/issue:execute --queue QUE-xxx --worktree /path/to/existing/worktree # Resume
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Parallelism**: Determined automatically by task dependency DAG (no manual control)
|
||||
**Executor & Dry-run**: Selected via interactive prompt (AskUserQuestion)
|
||||
**Worktree**: Creates ONE worktree for the entire queue execution (not per-solution)
|
||||
|
||||
**⭐ Recommended Executor**: **Codex** - Best for long-running autonomous work (2hr timeout), supports background execution and full write access
|
||||
|
||||
**Worktree Options**:
|
||||
- `--worktree` - Create a new worktree with timestamp-based name
|
||||
- `--worktree <existing-path>` - Resume in an existing worktree (for recovery/continuation)
|
||||
|
||||
**Resume**: Use `git worktree list` to find existing worktrees from interrupted executions
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 0: Validate Queue ID (REQUIRED)
|
||||
├─ If --queue provided → use specified queue
|
||||
├─ If --queue missing → list queues, prompt user to select
|
||||
└─ Store QUEUE_ID for all subsequent commands
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 0.5 (if --worktree): Setup Queue Worktree
|
||||
├─ Create ONE worktree for entire queue: .ccw/worktrees/queue-<timestamp>
|
||||
├─ All subsequent execution happens in this worktree
|
||||
└─ Main workspace remains clean and untouched
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 1: Get DAG & User Selection
|
||||
├─ ccw issue queue dag --queue ${QUEUE_ID} → { parallel_batches: [["S-1","S-2"], ["S-3"]] }
|
||||
└─ AskUserQuestion → executor type (codex|gemini|agent), dry-run mode, worktree mode
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: Dispatch Parallel Batch (DAG-driven)
|
||||
├─ Parallelism determined by DAG (no manual limit)
|
||||
├─ All executors work in the SAME worktree (or main if no worktree)
|
||||
├─ For each solution ID in batch (parallel - all at once):
|
||||
│ ├─ Executor calls: ccw issue detail <id> (READ-ONLY)
|
||||
│ ├─ Executor gets FULL SOLUTION with all tasks
|
||||
│ ├─ Executor implements all tasks sequentially (T1 → T2 → T3)
|
||||
│ ├─ Executor tests + verifies each task
|
||||
│ ├─ Executor commits ONCE per solution (with formatted summary)
|
||||
│ └─ Executor calls: ccw issue done <id>
|
||||
└─ Wait for batch completion
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: Next Batch (repeat Phase 2)
|
||||
└─ ccw issue queue dag → check for newly-ready solutions
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4 (if --worktree): Worktree Completion
|
||||
├─ All batches complete → prompt for merge strategy
|
||||
└─ Options: Create PR / Merge to main / Keep branch
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 0: Validate Queue ID
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Check if --queue was provided
|
||||
let QUEUE_ID = args.queue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!QUEUE_ID) {
|
||||
// List available queues
|
||||
const listResult = Bash('ccw issue queue list --brief --json').trim();
|
||||
const index = JSON.parse(listResult);
|
||||
|
||||
if (index.queues.length === 0) {
|
||||
console.log('No queues found. Use /issue:queue to create one first.');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Filter active queues only
|
||||
const activeQueues = index.queues.filter(q => q.status === 'active');
|
||||
|
||||
if (activeQueues.length === 0) {
|
||||
console.log('No active queues found.');
|
||||
console.log('Available queues:', index.queues.map(q => `${q.id} (${q.status})`).join(', '));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Display and prompt user
|
||||
console.log('\nAvailable Queues:');
|
||||
console.log('ID'.padEnd(22) + 'Status'.padEnd(12) + 'Progress'.padEnd(12) + 'Issues');
|
||||
console.log('-'.repeat(70));
|
||||
for (const q of index.queues) {
|
||||
const marker = q.id === index.active_queue_id ? '→ ' : ' ';
|
||||
console.log(marker + q.id.padEnd(20) + q.status.padEnd(12) +
|
||||
`${q.completed_solutions || 0}/${q.total_solutions || 0}`.padEnd(12) +
|
||||
q.issue_ids.join(', '));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: "Which queue would you like to execute?",
|
||||
header: "Queue",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: activeQueues.map(q => ({
|
||||
label: q.id,
|
||||
description: `${q.completed_solutions || 0}/${q.total_solutions || 0} completed, Issues: ${q.issue_ids.join(', ')}`
|
||||
}))
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
QUEUE_ID = answer['Queue'];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`\n## Executing Queue: ${QUEUE_ID}\n`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Get DAG & User Selection
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Get dependency graph and parallel batches (QUEUE_ID required)
|
||||
const dagJson = Bash(`ccw issue queue dag --queue ${QUEUE_ID}`).trim();
|
||||
const dag = JSON.parse(dagJson);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dag.error || dag.ready_count === 0) {
|
||||
console.log(dag.error || 'No solutions ready for execution');
|
||||
console.log('Use /issue:queue to form a queue first');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`
|
||||
## Queue DAG (Solution-Level)
|
||||
|
||||
- Total Solutions: ${dag.total}
|
||||
- Ready: ${dag.ready_count}
|
||||
- Completed: ${dag.completed_count}
|
||||
- Parallel in batch 1: ${dag.parallel_batches[0]?.length || 0}
|
||||
`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Interactive selection via AskUserQuestion
|
||||
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
question: 'Select executor type:',
|
||||
header: 'Executor',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Codex (Recommended)', description: 'Autonomous coding with full write access' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Gemini', description: 'Large context analysis and implementation' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Agent', description: 'Claude Code sub-agent for complex tasks' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
question: 'Execution mode:',
|
||||
header: 'Mode',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Execute (Recommended)', description: 'Run all ready solutions' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Dry-run', description: 'Show DAG and batches without executing' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
question: 'Use git worktree for queue isolation?',
|
||||
header: 'Worktree',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Yes (Recommended)', description: 'Create ONE worktree for entire queue - main stays clean' },
|
||||
{ label: 'No', description: 'Work directly in current directory' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const executor = answer['Executor'].toLowerCase().split(' ')[0]; // codex|gemini|agent
|
||||
const isDryRun = answer['Mode'].includes('Dry-run');
|
||||
const useWorktree = answer['Worktree'].includes('Yes');
|
||||
|
||||
// Dry run mode
|
||||
if (isDryRun) {
|
||||
console.log('### Parallel Batches (Dry-run):\n');
|
||||
dag.parallel_batches.forEach((batch, i) => {
|
||||
console.log(`Batch ${i + 1}: ${batch.join(', ')}`);
|
||||
});
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 0 & 2: Setup Queue Worktree & Dispatch
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Parallelism determined by DAG - no manual limit
|
||||
// All solutions in same batch have NO file conflicts and can run in parallel
|
||||
const batch = dag.parallel_batches[0] || [];
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize TodoWrite
|
||||
TodoWrite({
|
||||
todos: batch.map(id => ({
|
||||
content: `Execute solution ${id}`,
|
||||
status: 'pending',
|
||||
activeForm: `Executing solution ${id}`
|
||||
}))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`\n### Executing Solutions (DAG batch 1): ${batch.join(', ')}`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse existing worktree path from args if provided
|
||||
// Example: --worktree /path/to/existing/worktree
|
||||
const existingWorktree = args.worktree && typeof args.worktree === 'string' ? args.worktree : null;
|
||||
|
||||
// Setup ONE worktree for entire queue (not per-solution)
|
||||
let worktreePath = null;
|
||||
let worktreeBranch = null;
|
||||
|
||||
if (useWorktree) {
|
||||
const repoRoot = Bash('git rev-parse --show-toplevel').trim();
|
||||
const worktreeBase = `${repoRoot}/.ccw/worktrees`;
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p "${worktreeBase}"`);
|
||||
Bash('git worktree prune'); // Cleanup stale worktrees
|
||||
|
||||
if (existingWorktree) {
|
||||
// Resume mode: Use existing worktree
|
||||
worktreePath = existingWorktree;
|
||||
worktreeBranch = Bash(`git -C "${worktreePath}" branch --show-current`).trim();
|
||||
console.log(`Resuming in existing worktree: ${worktreePath} (branch: ${worktreeBranch})`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Create mode: ONE worktree for the entire queue
|
||||
const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[-:T]/g, '').slice(0, 14);
|
||||
worktreeBranch = `queue-exec-${dag.queue_id || timestamp}`;
|
||||
worktreePath = `${worktreeBase}/${worktreeBranch}`;
|
||||
Bash(`git worktree add "${worktreePath}" -b "${worktreeBranch}"`);
|
||||
console.log(`Created queue worktree: ${worktreePath}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Launch ALL solutions in batch in parallel (DAG guarantees no conflicts)
|
||||
// All executors work in the SAME worktree (or main if no worktree)
|
||||
const executions = batch.map(solutionId => {
|
||||
updateTodo(solutionId, 'in_progress');
|
||||
return dispatchExecutor(solutionId, executor, worktreePath);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await Promise.all(executions);
|
||||
batch.forEach(id => updateTodo(id, 'completed'));
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Executor Dispatch
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// worktreePath: path to shared worktree (null if not using worktree)
|
||||
function dispatchExecutor(solutionId, executorType, worktreePath = null) {
|
||||
// If worktree is provided, executor works in that directory
|
||||
// No per-solution worktree creation - ONE worktree for entire queue
|
||||
|
||||
// Pre-defined values (replaced at dispatch time, NOT by executor)
|
||||
const SOLUTION_ID = solutionId;
|
||||
const WORK_DIR = worktreePath || null;
|
||||
|
||||
// Build prompt without markdown code blocks to avoid escaping issues
|
||||
const prompt = `
|
||||
## Execute Solution: ${SOLUTION_ID}
|
||||
${WORK_DIR ? `Working Directory: ${WORK_DIR}` : ''}
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Get Solution Details
|
||||
Run this command to get the full solution with all tasks:
|
||||
ccw issue detail ${SOLUTION_ID}
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Execute All Tasks Sequentially
|
||||
The detail command returns a FULL SOLUTION with all tasks.
|
||||
Execute each task in order (T1 → T2 → T3 → ...):
|
||||
|
||||
For each task:
|
||||
- Follow task.implementation steps
|
||||
- Run task.test commands
|
||||
- Verify task.acceptance criteria
|
||||
- Do NOT commit after each task
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Commit Solution (Once)
|
||||
After ALL tasks pass, commit once with clean conventional format.
|
||||
|
||||
Command:
|
||||
git add -A
|
||||
git commit -m "<type>(<scope>): <brief description>"
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
git commit -m "feat(auth): add token refresh mechanism"
|
||||
git commit -m "fix(payment): resolve timeout in checkout flow"
|
||||
git commit -m "refactor(api): simplify error handling"
|
||||
|
||||
Replace <type> with: feat|fix|refactor|docs|test|chore
|
||||
Replace <scope> with: affected module name
|
||||
Replace <description> with: brief summary (NO solution/issue IDs)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Report Completion
|
||||
On success, run:
|
||||
ccw issue done ${SOLUTION_ID} --result '{
|
||||
"solution_id": "<solution-id>",
|
||||
"issue_id": "<issue-id>",
|
||||
"commit": {
|
||||
"hash": "<commit-hash>",
|
||||
"type": "<commit-type>",
|
||||
"scope": "<commit-scope>",
|
||||
"message": "<commit-message>"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"analysis": {
|
||||
"risk": "<low|medium|high>",
|
||||
"impact": "<low|medium|high>",
|
||||
"complexity": "<low|medium|high>"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"tasks_completed": [
|
||||
{"id": "T1", "title": "...", "action": "...", "scope": "..."},
|
||||
{"id": "T2", "title": "...", "action": "...", "scope": "..."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"files_modified": ["<file1>", "<file2>"],
|
||||
"tests_passed": true,
|
||||
"verification": {
|
||||
"all_tests_passed": true,
|
||||
"acceptance_criteria_met": true,
|
||||
"regression_checked": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"summary": "<brief description of accomplishment>"
|
||||
}'
|
||||
|
||||
On failure, run:
|
||||
ccw issue done ${SOLUTION_ID} --fail --reason '{
|
||||
"task_id": "<TX>",
|
||||
"error_type": "<test_failure|build_error|other>",
|
||||
"message": "<error details>",
|
||||
"files_attempted": ["<file1>", "<file2>"],
|
||||
"commit": null
|
||||
}'
|
||||
|
||||
### Important Notes
|
||||
- Do NOT cleanup worktree - it is shared by all solutions in the queue
|
||||
- Replace all <placeholder> values with actual values from your execution
|
||||
`;
|
||||
|
||||
// For CLI tools, pass --cd to set working directory
|
||||
const cdOption = worktreePath ? ` --cd "${worktreePath}"` : '';
|
||||
|
||||
if (executorType === 'codex') {
|
||||
return Bash(
|
||||
`ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(prompt)}" --tool codex --mode write --id exec-${solutionId}${cdOption}`,
|
||||
{ timeout: 7200000, run_in_background: true } // 2hr for full solution
|
||||
);
|
||||
} else if (executorType === 'gemini') {
|
||||
return Bash(
|
||||
`ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(prompt)}" --tool gemini --mode write --id exec-${solutionId}${cdOption}`,
|
||||
{ timeout: 3600000, run_in_background: true }
|
||||
);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: 'code-developer',
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: `Execute solution ${solutionId}`,
|
||||
prompt: worktreePath ? `Working directory: ${worktreePath}\n\n${prompt}` : prompt
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Check Next Batch
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Refresh DAG after batch completes (use same QUEUE_ID)
|
||||
const refreshedDag = JSON.parse(Bash(`ccw issue queue dag --queue ${QUEUE_ID}`).trim());
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`
|
||||
## Batch Complete
|
||||
|
||||
- Solutions Completed: ${refreshedDag.completed_count}/${refreshedDag.total}
|
||||
- Next ready: ${refreshedDag.ready_count}
|
||||
`);
|
||||
|
||||
if (refreshedDag.ready_count > 0) {
|
||||
console.log(`Run \`/issue:execute --queue ${QUEUE_ID}\` again for next batch.`);
|
||||
// Note: If resuming, pass existing worktree path:
|
||||
// /issue:execute --queue ${QUEUE_ID} --worktree <worktreePath>
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Worktree Completion (after ALL batches)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Only run when ALL solutions completed AND using worktree
|
||||
if (useWorktree && refreshedDag.ready_count === 0 && refreshedDag.completed_count === refreshedDag.total) {
|
||||
console.log('\n## All Solutions Completed - Worktree Cleanup');
|
||||
|
||||
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Queue complete. What to do with worktree branch "${worktreeBranch}"?`,
|
||||
header: 'Merge',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Create PR (Recommended)', description: 'Push branch and create pull request' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Merge to main', description: 'Merge all commits and cleanup worktree' },
|
||||
{ label: 'Keep branch', description: 'Cleanup worktree, keep branch for manual handling' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const repoRoot = Bash('git rev-parse --show-toplevel').trim();
|
||||
|
||||
if (answer['Merge'].includes('Create PR')) {
|
||||
Bash(`git -C "${worktreePath}" push -u origin "${worktreeBranch}"`);
|
||||
Bash(`gh pr create --title "Queue ${dag.queue_id}" --body "Issue queue execution - all solutions completed" --head "${worktreeBranch}"`);
|
||||
Bash(`git worktree remove "${worktreePath}"`);
|
||||
console.log(`PR created for branch: ${worktreeBranch}`);
|
||||
} else if (answer['Merge'].includes('Merge to main')) {
|
||||
// Check main is clean
|
||||
const mainDirty = Bash('git status --porcelain').trim();
|
||||
if (mainDirty) {
|
||||
console.log('Warning: Main has uncommitted changes. Falling back to PR.');
|
||||
Bash(`git -C "${worktreePath}" push -u origin "${worktreeBranch}"`);
|
||||
Bash(`gh pr create --title "Queue ${dag.queue_id}" --body "Issue queue execution (main had uncommitted changes)" --head "${worktreeBranch}"`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Bash(`git merge --no-ff "${worktreeBranch}" -m "Merge queue ${dag.queue_id}"`);
|
||||
Bash(`git branch -d "${worktreeBranch}"`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Bash(`git worktree remove "${worktreePath}"`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Bash(`git worktree remove "${worktreePath}"`);
|
||||
console.log(`Branch ${worktreeBranch} kept for manual handling`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Parallel Execution Model
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Orchestrator │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ 0. Validate QUEUE_ID (required, or prompt user to select) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 0.5 (if --worktree) Create ONE worktree for entire queue │
|
||||
│ → .ccw/worktrees/queue-exec-<queue-id> │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 1. ccw issue queue dag --queue ${QUEUE_ID} │
|
||||
│ → { parallel_batches: [["S-1","S-2"], ["S-3"]] } │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 2. Dispatch batch 1 (parallel, SAME worktree): │
|
||||
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ Shared Queue Worktree (or main) │ │
|
||||
│ │ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ Executor 1 │ │ Executor 2 │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ detail S-1 │ │ detail S-2 │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ [T1→T2→T3] │ │ [T1→T2] │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ commit S-1 │ │ commit S-2 │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ │ done S-1 │ │ done S-2 │ │ │
|
||||
│ │ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 3. ccw issue queue dag (refresh) │
|
||||
│ → S-3 now ready → dispatch batch 2 (same worktree) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ 4. (if --worktree) ALL batches complete → cleanup worktree │
|
||||
│ → Prompt: Create PR / Merge to main / Keep branch │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this works for parallel:**
|
||||
- **ONE worktree for entire queue** → all solutions share same isolated workspace
|
||||
- `detail <id>` is READ-ONLY → no race conditions
|
||||
- Each executor handles **all tasks within a solution** sequentially
|
||||
- **One commit per solution** with formatted summary (not per-task)
|
||||
- `done <id>` updates only its own solution status
|
||||
- `queue dag` recalculates ready solutions after each batch
|
||||
- Solutions in same batch have NO file conflicts (DAG guarantees)
|
||||
- **Main workspace stays clean** until merge/PR decision
|
||||
|
||||
## CLI Endpoint Contract
|
||||
|
||||
### `ccw issue queue list --brief --json`
|
||||
Returns queue index for selection (used when --queue not provided):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"active_queue_id": "QUE-20251215-001",
|
||||
"queues": [
|
||||
{ "id": "QUE-20251215-001", "status": "active", "issue_ids": ["ISS-001"], "total_solutions": 5, "completed_solutions": 2 }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `ccw issue queue dag --queue <queue-id>`
|
||||
Returns dependency graph with parallel batches (solution-level, **--queue required**):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"queue_id": "QUE-...",
|
||||
"total": 3,
|
||||
"ready_count": 2,
|
||||
"completed_count": 0,
|
||||
"nodes": [
|
||||
{ "id": "S-1", "issue_id": "ISS-xxx", "status": "pending", "ready": true, "task_count": 3 },
|
||||
{ "id": "S-2", "issue_id": "ISS-yyy", "status": "pending", "ready": true, "task_count": 2 },
|
||||
{ "id": "S-3", "issue_id": "ISS-zzz", "status": "pending", "ready": false, "depends_on": ["S-1"] }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"parallel_batches": [["S-1", "S-2"], ["S-3"]]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `ccw issue detail <item_id>`
|
||||
Returns FULL SOLUTION with all tasks (READ-ONLY):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"item_id": "S-1",
|
||||
"issue_id": "ISS-xxx",
|
||||
"solution_id": "SOL-xxx",
|
||||
"status": "pending",
|
||||
"solution": {
|
||||
"id": "SOL-xxx",
|
||||
"approach": "...",
|
||||
"tasks": [
|
||||
{ "id": "T1", "title": "...", "implementation": [...], "test": {...} },
|
||||
{ "id": "T2", "title": "...", "implementation": [...], "test": {...} },
|
||||
{ "id": "T3", "title": "...", "implementation": [...], "test": {...} }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"exploration_context": { "relevant_files": [...] }
|
||||
},
|
||||
"execution_hints": { "executor": "codex", "estimated_minutes": 180 }
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `ccw issue done <item_id>`
|
||||
Marks solution completed/failed, updates queue state, checks for queue completion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Resolution |
|
||||
|-------|------------|
|
||||
| No queue | Run /issue:queue first |
|
||||
| No ready solutions | Dependencies blocked, check DAG |
|
||||
| Executor timeout | Solution not marked done, can retry |
|
||||
| Solution failure | Use `ccw issue retry` to reset |
|
||||
| Partial task failure | Executor reports which task failed via `done --fail` |
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/issue:plan` - Plan issues with solutions
|
||||
- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue
|
||||
- `ccw issue queue dag` - View dependency graph
|
||||
- `ccw issue detail <id>` - View task details
|
||||
- `ccw issue retry` - Reset failed tasks
|
||||
@@ -1,382 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: from-brainstorm
|
||||
description: Convert brainstorm session ideas into issue with executable solution for parallel-dev-cycle
|
||||
argument-hint: "SESSION=\"<session-id>\" [--idea=<index>] [--auto] [-y|--yes]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-select highest-scored idea, skip confirmations, create issue directly.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue From-Brainstorm Command (/issue:from-brainstorm)
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Bridge command that converts **brainstorm-with-file** session output into executable **issue + solution** for parallel-dev-cycle consumption.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core workflow**: Load Session → Select Idea → Convert to Issue → Generate Solution → Bind & Ready
|
||||
|
||||
**Input sources**:
|
||||
- **synthesis.json** - Main brainstorm results with top_ideas
|
||||
- **perspectives.json** - Multi-CLI perspectives (creative/pragmatic/systematic)
|
||||
- **.brainstorming/** - Synthesis artifacts (clarifications, enhancements from role analyses)
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**:
|
||||
- **Issue** (ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN) - Full context with clarifications
|
||||
- **Solution** (SOL-{issue-id}-{uid}) - Structured tasks for parallel-dev-cycle
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Interactive mode - select idea, confirm before creation
|
||||
/issue:from-brainstorm SESSION="BS-rate-limiting-2025-01-28"
|
||||
|
||||
# Pre-select idea by index
|
||||
/issue:from-brainstorm SESSION="BS-auth-system-2025-01-28" --idea=0
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto mode - select highest scored, no confirmations
|
||||
/issue:from-brainstorm SESSION="BS-caching-2025-01-28" --auto -y
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Arguments
|
||||
|
||||
| Argument | Required | Type | Default | Description |
|
||||
|----------|----------|------|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| SESSION | Yes | String | - | Session ID or path to `.workflow/.brainstorm/BS-xxx` |
|
||||
| --idea | No | Integer | - | Pre-select idea by index (0-based) |
|
||||
| --auto | No | Flag | false | Auto-select highest-scored idea |
|
||||
| -y, --yes | No | Flag | false | Skip all confirmations |
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Structures
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue Schema (Output)
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
interface Issue {
|
||||
id: string; // ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN
|
||||
title: string; // From idea.title
|
||||
status: 'planned'; // Auto-set after solution binding
|
||||
priority: number; // 1-5 (derived from idea.score)
|
||||
context: string; // Full description with clarifications
|
||||
source: 'brainstorm';
|
||||
labels: string[]; // ['brainstorm', perspective, feasibility]
|
||||
|
||||
// Structured fields
|
||||
expected_behavior: string; // From key_strengths
|
||||
actual_behavior: string; // From main_challenges
|
||||
affected_components: string[]; // Extracted from description
|
||||
|
||||
_brainstorm_metadata: {
|
||||
session_id: string;
|
||||
idea_score: number;
|
||||
novelty: number;
|
||||
feasibility: string;
|
||||
clarifications_count: number;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Solution Schema (Output)
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
interface Solution {
|
||||
id: string; // SOL-{issue-id}-{4-char-uid}
|
||||
description: string; // idea.title
|
||||
approach: string; // idea.description
|
||||
tasks: Task[]; // Generated from idea.next_steps
|
||||
|
||||
analysis: {
|
||||
risk: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
|
||||
impact: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
|
||||
complexity: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high';
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
is_bound: boolean; // true
|
||||
created_at: string;
|
||||
bound_at: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface Task {
|
||||
id: string; // T1, T2, T3...
|
||||
title: string; // Actionable task name
|
||||
scope: string; // design|implementation|testing|documentation
|
||||
action: string; // Implement|Design|Research|Test|Document
|
||||
description: string;
|
||||
|
||||
implementation: string[]; // Step-by-step guide
|
||||
acceptance: {
|
||||
criteria: string[]; // What defines success
|
||||
verification: string[]; // How to verify
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
priority: number; // 1-5
|
||||
depends_on: string[]; // Task dependencies
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Session Loading
|
||||
├─ Validate session path
|
||||
├─ Load synthesis.json (required)
|
||||
├─ Load perspectives.json (optional - multi-CLI insights)
|
||||
├─ Load .brainstorming/** (optional - synthesis artifacts)
|
||||
└─ Validate top_ideas array exists
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: Idea Selection
|
||||
├─ Auto mode: Select highest scored idea
|
||||
├─ Pre-selected: Use --idea=N index
|
||||
└─ Interactive: Display table, ask user to select
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: Enrich Issue Context
|
||||
├─ Base: idea.description + key_strengths + main_challenges
|
||||
├─ Add: Relevant clarifications (Requirements/Architecture/Feasibility)
|
||||
├─ Add: Multi-perspective insights (creative/pragmatic/systematic)
|
||||
└─ Add: Session metadata (session_id, completion date, clarification count)
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4: Create Issue
|
||||
├─ Generate issue data with enriched context
|
||||
├─ Calculate priority from idea.score (0-10 → 1-5)
|
||||
├─ Create via: ccw issue create (heredoc for JSON)
|
||||
└─ Returns: ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 5: Generate Solution Tasks
|
||||
├─ T1: Research & Validate (if main_challenges exist)
|
||||
├─ T2: Design & Specification (if key_strengths exist)
|
||||
├─ T3+: Implementation tasks (from idea.next_steps)
|
||||
└─ Each task includes: implementation steps + acceptance criteria
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 6: Bind Solution
|
||||
├─ Write solution to .workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
|
||||
├─ Bind via: ccw issue bind {issue-id} {solution-id}
|
||||
├─ Update issue status to 'planned'
|
||||
└─ Returns: SOL-{issue-id}-{uid}
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 7: Next Steps
|
||||
└─ Offer: Form queue | Convert another idea | View details | Done
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Context Enrichment Logic
|
||||
|
||||
### Base Context (Always Included)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Description**: `idea.description`
|
||||
- **Why This Idea**: `idea.key_strengths[]`
|
||||
- **Challenges to Address**: `idea.main_challenges[]`
|
||||
- **Implementation Steps**: `idea.next_steps[]`
|
||||
|
||||
### Enhanced Context (If Available)
|
||||
|
||||
**From Synthesis Artifacts** (`.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md`):
|
||||
- Extract clarifications matching categories: Requirements, Architecture, Feasibility
|
||||
- Format: `**{Category}** ({role}): {question} → {answer}`
|
||||
- Limit: Top 3 most relevant
|
||||
|
||||
**From Perspectives** (`perspectives.json`):
|
||||
- **Creative**: First insight from `perspectives.creative.insights[0]`
|
||||
- **Pragmatic**: First blocker from `perspectives.pragmatic.blockers[0]`
|
||||
- **Systematic**: First pattern from `perspectives.systematic.patterns[0]`
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Metadata**:
|
||||
- Session ID, Topic, Completion Date
|
||||
- Clarifications count (if synthesis artifacts loaded)
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Generation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 1: Research & Validation
|
||||
**Trigger**: `idea.main_challenges.length > 0`
|
||||
- **Title**: "Research & Validate Approach"
|
||||
- **Scope**: design
|
||||
- **Action**: Research
|
||||
- **Implementation**: Investigate blockers, review similar implementations, validate with team
|
||||
- **Acceptance**: Blockers documented, feasibility assessed, approach validated
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 2: Design & Specification
|
||||
**Trigger**: `idea.key_strengths.length > 0`
|
||||
- **Title**: "Design & Create Specification"
|
||||
- **Scope**: design
|
||||
- **Action**: Design
|
||||
- **Implementation**: Create design doc, define success criteria, plan phases
|
||||
- **Acceptance**: Design complete, metrics defined, plan outlined
|
||||
|
||||
### Task 3+: Implementation Tasks
|
||||
**Trigger**: `idea.next_steps[]`
|
||||
- **Title**: From `next_steps[i]` (max 60 chars)
|
||||
- **Scope**: Inferred from keywords (test→testing, api→backend, ui→frontend)
|
||||
- **Action**: Detected from verbs (implement, create, update, fix, test, document)
|
||||
- **Implementation**: Execute step + follow design + write tests
|
||||
- **Acceptance**: Step implemented + tests passing + code reviewed
|
||||
|
||||
### Fallback Task
|
||||
**Trigger**: No tasks generated from above
|
||||
- **Title**: `idea.title`
|
||||
- **Scope**: implementation
|
||||
- **Action**: Implement
|
||||
- **Generic implementation + acceptance criteria**
|
||||
|
||||
## Priority Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue Priority (1-5)
|
||||
```
|
||||
idea.score: 0-10
|
||||
priority = max(1, min(5, ceil((10 - score) / 2)))
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
score 9-10 → priority 1 (critical)
|
||||
score 7-8 → priority 2 (high)
|
||||
score 5-6 → priority 3 (medium)
|
||||
score 3-4 → priority 4 (low)
|
||||
score 0-2 → priority 5 (lowest)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Task Priority (1-5)
|
||||
- Research task: 1 (highest)
|
||||
- Design task: 2
|
||||
- Implementation tasks: 3 by default, decrement for later tasks
|
||||
- Testing/documentation: 4-5
|
||||
|
||||
### Complexity Analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
risk: main_challenges.length > 2 ? 'high' : 'medium'
|
||||
impact: score >= 8 ? 'high' : score >= 6 ? 'medium' : 'low'
|
||||
complexity: main_challenges > 3 OR tasks > 5 ? 'high'
|
||||
tasks > 3 ? 'medium' : 'low'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## CLI Integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue Creation
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Uses heredoc to avoid shell escaping
|
||||
ccw issue create << 'EOF'
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "...",
|
||||
"context": "...",
|
||||
"priority": 3,
|
||||
"source": "brainstorm",
|
||||
"labels": ["brainstorm", "creative", "feasibility-high"],
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Solution Binding
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Append solution to JSONL file
|
||||
echo '{"id":"SOL-xxx","tasks":[...]}' >> .workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
|
||||
|
||||
# Bind to issue
|
||||
ccw issue bind {issue-id} {solution-id}
|
||||
|
||||
# Update status
|
||||
ccw issue update {issue-id} --status planned
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Message | Resolution |
|
||||
|-------|---------|------------|
|
||||
| Session not found | synthesis.json missing | Check session ID, list available sessions |
|
||||
| No ideas | top_ideas array empty | Complete brainstorm workflow first |
|
||||
| Invalid idea index | Index out of range | Check valid range 0 to N-1 |
|
||||
| Issue creation failed | ccw issue create error | Verify CLI endpoint working |
|
||||
| Solution binding failed | Bind error | Check issue exists, retry |
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Interactive Mode
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:from-brainstorm SESSION="BS-rate-limiting-2025-01-28"
|
||||
|
||||
# Output:
|
||||
# | # | Title | Score | Feasibility |
|
||||
# |---|-------|-------|-------------|
|
||||
# | 0 | Token Bucket Algorithm | 8.5 | High |
|
||||
# | 1 | Sliding Window Counter | 7.2 | Medium |
|
||||
# | 2 | Fixed Window | 6.1 | High |
|
||||
|
||||
# User selects: #0
|
||||
|
||||
# Result:
|
||||
# ✓ Created issue: ISS-20250128-001
|
||||
# ✓ Created solution: SOL-ISS-20250128-001-ab3d
|
||||
# ✓ Bound solution to issue
|
||||
# → Next: /issue:queue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:from-brainstorm SESSION="BS-caching-2025-01-28" --auto
|
||||
|
||||
# Result:
|
||||
# Auto-selected: Redis Cache Layer (Score: 9.2/10)
|
||||
# ✓ Created issue: ISS-20250128-002
|
||||
# ✓ Solution with 4 tasks
|
||||
# → Status: planned
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
brainstorm-with-file
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ synthesis.json
|
||||
├─ perspectives.json
|
||||
└─ .brainstorming/** (optional)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
/issue:from-brainstorm ◄─── This command
|
||||
│
|
||||
├─ ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN (enriched issue)
|
||||
└─ SOL-{issue-id}-{uid} (structured solution)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
/issue:queue
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
/parallel-dev-cycle
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
RA → EP → CD → VAS
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Files Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Files
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/.brainstorm/BS-{slug}-{date}/
|
||||
├── synthesis.json # REQUIRED - Top ideas with scores
|
||||
├── perspectives.json # OPTIONAL - Multi-CLI insights
|
||||
├── brainstorm.md # Reference only
|
||||
└── .brainstorming/ # OPTIONAL - Synthesis artifacts
|
||||
├── system-architect/
|
||||
│ └── analysis.md # Contains clarifications + enhancements
|
||||
├── api-designer/
|
||||
│ └── analysis.md
|
||||
└── ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Files
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/issues/
|
||||
├── solutions/
|
||||
│ └── ISS-YYYYMMDD-001.jsonl # Created solution (JSONL)
|
||||
└── (managed by ccw issue CLI)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/workflow:brainstorm-with-file` - Generate brainstorm sessions
|
||||
- `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` - Add clarifications to brainstorm
|
||||
- `/issue:new` - Create issues from GitHub or text
|
||||
- `/issue:plan` - Generate solutions via exploration
|
||||
- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue
|
||||
- `/issue:execute` - Execute with parallel-dev-cycle
|
||||
- `ccw issue status <id>` - View issue
|
||||
- `ccw issue solution <id>` - View solution
|
||||
@@ -1,416 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: new
|
||||
description: Create structured issue from GitHub URL or text description
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] <github-url | text-description> [--priority 1-5]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), AskUserQuestion(*), mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Skip clarification questions, create issue with inferred details.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue New Command (/issue:new)
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Principle
|
||||
|
||||
**Requirement Clarity Detection** → Ask only when needed
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Clear Input (GitHub URL, structured text) → Direct creation
|
||||
Unclear Input (vague description) → Minimal clarifying questions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Issue Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
interface Issue {
|
||||
id: string; // GH-123 or ISS-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS
|
||||
title: string;
|
||||
status: 'registered' | 'planned' | 'queued' | 'in_progress' | 'completed' | 'failed';
|
||||
priority: number; // 1 (critical) to 5 (low)
|
||||
context: string; // Problem description (single source of truth)
|
||||
source: 'github' | 'text' | 'discovery';
|
||||
source_url?: string;
|
||||
labels?: string[];
|
||||
|
||||
// GitHub binding (for non-GitHub sources that publish to GitHub)
|
||||
github_url?: string; // https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123
|
||||
github_number?: number; // 123
|
||||
|
||||
// Optional structured fields
|
||||
expected_behavior?: string;
|
||||
actual_behavior?: string;
|
||||
affected_components?: string[];
|
||||
|
||||
// Feedback history (failures + human clarifications)
|
||||
feedback?: {
|
||||
type: 'failure' | 'clarification' | 'rejection';
|
||||
stage: string; // new/plan/execute
|
||||
content: string;
|
||||
created_at: string;
|
||||
}[];
|
||||
|
||||
// Solution binding
|
||||
bound_solution_id: string | null;
|
||||
|
||||
// Timestamps
|
||||
created_at: string;
|
||||
updated_at: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Reference
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Clear inputs - direct creation
|
||||
/issue:new https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123
|
||||
/issue:new "Login fails with special chars. Expected: success. Actual: 500 error"
|
||||
|
||||
# Vague input - will ask clarifying questions
|
||||
/issue:new "something wrong with auth"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Input Analysis & Clarity Detection
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const input = userInput.trim();
|
||||
const flags = parseFlags(userInput); // --priority
|
||||
|
||||
// Detect input type and clarity
|
||||
const isGitHubUrl = input.match(/github\.com\/[\w-]+\/[\w-]+\/issues\/\d+/);
|
||||
const isGitHubShort = input.match(/^#(\d+)$/);
|
||||
const hasStructure = input.match(/(expected|actual|affects|steps):/i);
|
||||
|
||||
// Clarity score: 0-3
|
||||
let clarityScore = 0;
|
||||
if (isGitHubUrl || isGitHubShort) clarityScore = 3; // GitHub = fully clear
|
||||
else if (hasStructure) clarityScore = 2; // Structured text = clear
|
||||
else if (input.length > 50) clarityScore = 1; // Long text = somewhat clear
|
||||
else clarityScore = 0; // Vague
|
||||
|
||||
let issueData = {};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Data Extraction (GitHub or Text)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
if (isGitHubUrl || isGitHubShort) {
|
||||
// GitHub - fetch via gh CLI
|
||||
const result = Bash(`gh issue view ${extractIssueRef(input)} --json number,title,body,labels,url`);
|
||||
const gh = JSON.parse(result);
|
||||
issueData = {
|
||||
id: `GH-${gh.number}`,
|
||||
title: gh.title,
|
||||
source: 'github',
|
||||
source_url: gh.url,
|
||||
labels: gh.labels.map(l => l.name),
|
||||
context: gh.body?.substring(0, 500) || gh.title,
|
||||
...parseMarkdownBody(gh.body)
|
||||
};
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Text description
|
||||
issueData = {
|
||||
id: `ISS-${new Date().toISOString().replace(/[-:T]/g, '').slice(0, 14)}`,
|
||||
source: 'text',
|
||||
...parseTextDescription(input)
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Lightweight Context Hint (Conditional)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// ACE search ONLY for medium clarity (1-2) AND missing components
|
||||
// Skip for: GitHub (has context), vague (needs clarification first)
|
||||
// Note: Deep exploration happens in /issue:plan, this is just a quick hint
|
||||
|
||||
if (clarityScore >= 1 && clarityScore <= 2 && !issueData.affected_components?.length) {
|
||||
const keywords = extractKeywords(issueData.context);
|
||||
|
||||
if (keywords.length >= 2) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const aceResult = mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
|
||||
project_root_path: process.cwd(),
|
||||
query: keywords.slice(0, 3).join(' ')
|
||||
});
|
||||
issueData.affected_components = aceResult.files?.slice(0, 3) || [];
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
// ACE failure is non-blocking
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Conditional Clarification (Only if Unclear)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// ONLY ask questions if clarity is low - simple open-ended prompt
|
||||
if (clarityScore < 2 && (!issueData.context || issueData.context.length < 20)) {
|
||||
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: 'Please describe the issue in more detail:',
|
||||
header: 'Clarify',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Provide details', description: 'Describe what, where, and expected behavior' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Use custom text input (via "Other")
|
||||
if (answer.customText) {
|
||||
issueData.context = answer.customText;
|
||||
issueData.title = answer.customText.split(/[.\n]/)[0].substring(0, 60);
|
||||
issueData.feedback = [{
|
||||
type: 'clarification',
|
||||
stage: 'new',
|
||||
content: answer.customText,
|
||||
created_at: new Date().toISOString()
|
||||
}];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: GitHub Publishing Decision (Non-GitHub Sources)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// For non-GitHub sources, ask if user wants to publish to GitHub
|
||||
let publishToGitHub = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (issueData.source !== 'github') {
|
||||
const publishAnswer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: 'Would you like to publish this issue to GitHub?',
|
||||
header: 'Publish',
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: 'Yes, publish to GitHub', description: 'Create issue on GitHub and link it' },
|
||||
{ label: 'No, keep local only', description: 'Store as local issue without GitHub sync' }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
publishToGitHub = publishAnswer.answers?.['Publish']?.includes('Yes');
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Create Issue
|
||||
|
||||
**Summary Display:**
|
||||
- Show ID, title, source, affected files (if any)
|
||||
|
||||
**Confirmation** (only for vague inputs, clarityScore < 2):
|
||||
- Use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm before creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue Creation** (via CLI endpoint):
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Option 1: Pipe input (recommended for complex JSON - avoids shell escaping)
|
||||
echo '{"title":"...", "context":"...", "priority":3}' | ccw issue create
|
||||
|
||||
# Option 2: Heredoc (for multi-line JSON)
|
||||
ccw issue create << 'EOF'
|
||||
{"title":"...", "context":"含\"引号\"的内容", "priority":3}
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
|
||||
# Option 3: --data parameter (simple cases only)
|
||||
ccw issue create --data '{"title":"...", "priority":3}'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI Endpoint Features:**
|
||||
| Feature | Description |
|
||||
|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| Auto-increment ID | `ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN` (e.g., `ISS-20251229-001`) |
|
||||
| Trailing newline | Proper JSONL format, no corruption |
|
||||
| JSON output | Returns created issue with all fields |
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create issue via pipe (recommended)
|
||||
echo '{"title": "Login fails with special chars", "context": "500 error when password contains quotes", "priority": 2}' | ccw issue create
|
||||
|
||||
# Or with heredoc for complex JSON
|
||||
ccw issue create << 'EOF'
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "Login fails with special chars",
|
||||
"context": "500 error when password contains \"quotes\"",
|
||||
"priority": 2,
|
||||
"source": "text",
|
||||
"expected_behavior": "Login succeeds",
|
||||
"actual_behavior": "500 Internal Server Error"
|
||||
}
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
|
||||
# Output (JSON)
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "ISS-20251229-001",
|
||||
"title": "Login fails with special chars",
|
||||
"status": "registered",
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**GitHub Publishing** (if user opted in):
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Step 1: Create local issue FIRST
|
||||
const localIssue = createLocalIssue(issueData); // ccw issue create
|
||||
|
||||
// Step 2: Publish to GitHub if requested
|
||||
if (publishToGitHub) {
|
||||
const ghResult = Bash(`gh issue create --title "${issueData.title}" --body "${issueData.context}"`);
|
||||
// Parse GitHub URL from output
|
||||
const ghUrl = ghResult.match(/https:\/\/github\.com\/[\w-]+\/[\w-]+\/issues\/\d+/)?.[0];
|
||||
const ghNumber = parseInt(ghUrl?.match(/\/issues\/(\d+)/)?.[1]);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ghNumber) {
|
||||
// Step 3: Update local issue with GitHub binding
|
||||
Bash(`ccw issue update ${localIssue.id} --github-url "${ghUrl}" --github-number ${ghNumber}`);
|
||||
// Or via pipe:
|
||||
// echo '{"github_url":"${ghUrl}","github_number":${ghNumber}}' | ccw issue update ${localIssue.id}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Create local issue (ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN) → stored in .workflow/issues.jsonl
|
||||
2. If publishToGitHub:
|
||||
a. gh issue create → returns GitHub URL
|
||||
b. Update local issue with github_url + github_number binding
|
||||
3. Both local and GitHub issues exist, linked together
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example with GitHub Publishing:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# User creates text issue
|
||||
/issue:new "Login fails with special chars. Expected: success. Actual: 500"
|
||||
|
||||
# System asks: "Would you like to publish this issue to GitHub?"
|
||||
# User selects: "Yes, publish to GitHub"
|
||||
|
||||
# Output:
|
||||
# ✓ Local issue created: ISS-20251229-001
|
||||
# ✓ Published to GitHub: https://github.com/org/repo/issues/123
|
||||
# ✓ GitHub binding saved to local issue
|
||||
# → Next step: /issue:plan ISS-20251229-001
|
||||
|
||||
# Resulting issue JSON:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "ISS-20251229-001",
|
||||
"title": "Login fails with special chars",
|
||||
"source": "text",
|
||||
"github_url": "https://github.com/org/repo/issues/123",
|
||||
"github_number": 123,
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Completion:**
|
||||
- Display created issue ID
|
||||
- Show GitHub URL (if published)
|
||||
- Show next step: `/issue:plan <id>`
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Input Analysis
|
||||
└─ Detect clarity score (GitHub URL? Structured text? Keywords?)
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: Data Extraction (branched by clarity)
|
||||
┌────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────┐
|
||||
│ Score 3 │ Score 1-2 │ Score 0 │
|
||||
│ GitHub │ Text + ACE │ Vague │
|
||||
├────────────┼─────────────────┼──────────────┤
|
||||
│ gh CLI │ Parse struct │ AskQuestion │
|
||||
│ → parse │ + quick hint │ (1 question) │
|
||||
│ │ (3 files max) │ → feedback │
|
||||
└────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────┘
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: GitHub Publishing Decision (non-GitHub only)
|
||||
├─ Source = github: Skip (already from GitHub)
|
||||
└─ Source ≠ github: AskUserQuestion
|
||||
├─ Yes → publishToGitHub = true
|
||||
└─ No → publishToGitHub = false
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4: Create Issue
|
||||
├─ Score ≥ 2: Direct creation
|
||||
└─ Score < 2: Confirm first → Create
|
||||
└─ If publishToGitHub: gh issue create → link URL
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Deep exploration & lifecycle deferred to /issue:plan
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Helper Functions
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
function extractKeywords(text) {
|
||||
const stopWords = new Set(['the', 'a', 'an', 'is', 'are', 'was', 'were', 'not', 'with']);
|
||||
return text
|
||||
.toLowerCase()
|
||||
.split(/\W+/)
|
||||
.filter(w => w.length > 3 && !stopWords.has(w))
|
||||
.slice(0, 5);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function parseTextDescription(text) {
|
||||
const result = { title: '', context: '' };
|
||||
const sentences = text.split(/\.(?=\s|$)/);
|
||||
|
||||
result.title = sentences[0]?.trim().substring(0, 60) || 'Untitled';
|
||||
result.context = text.substring(0, 500);
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract structured fields if present
|
||||
const expected = text.match(/expected:?\s*([^.]+)/i);
|
||||
const actual = text.match(/actual:?\s*([^.]+)/i);
|
||||
const affects = text.match(/affects?:?\s*([^.]+)/i);
|
||||
|
||||
if (expected) result.expected_behavior = expected[1].trim();
|
||||
if (actual) result.actual_behavior = actual[1].trim();
|
||||
if (affects) {
|
||||
result.affected_components = affects[1].split(/[,\s]+/).filter(c => c.includes('/') || c.includes('.'));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function parseMarkdownBody(body) {
|
||||
if (!body) return {};
|
||||
const result = {};
|
||||
|
||||
const problem = body.match(/##?\s*(problem|description)[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
|
||||
const expected = body.match(/##?\s*expected[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
|
||||
const actual = body.match(/##?\s*actual[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
|
||||
|
||||
if (problem) result.context = problem[2].trim().substring(0, 500);
|
||||
if (expected) result.expected_behavior = expected[2].trim();
|
||||
if (actual) result.actual_behavior = actual[2].trim();
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Clear Input (No Questions)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:new https://github.com/org/repo/issues/42
|
||||
# → Fetches, parses, creates immediately
|
||||
|
||||
/issue:new "Login fails with special chars. Expected: success. Actual: 500"
|
||||
# → Parses structure, creates immediately
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Vague Input (1 Question)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:new "auth broken"
|
||||
# → Asks: "Input unclear. What is the issue about?"
|
||||
# → User provides details → saved to feedback[]
|
||||
# → Creates issue
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/issue:plan` - Plan solution for issue
|
||||
@@ -1,335 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: plan
|
||||
description: Batch plan issue resolution using issue-plan-agent (explore + plan closed-loop)
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] --all-pending <issue-id>[,<issue-id>,...] [--batch-size 3]"
|
||||
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), Skill(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-bind solutions without confirmation, use recommended settings.
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue Plan Command (/issue:plan)
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Unified planning command using **issue-plan-agent** that combines exploration and planning into a single closed-loop workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
**Behavior:**
|
||||
- Single solution per issue → auto-bind
|
||||
- Multiple solutions → return for user selection
|
||||
- Agent handles file generation
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
**⚠️ Data Access Principle**: Issues and solutions files can grow very large. To avoid context overflow:
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | Correct | Incorrect |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|-----------|
|
||||
| List issues (brief) | `ccw issue list --status pending --brief` | `Read('issues.jsonl')` |
|
||||
| Read issue details | `ccw issue status <id> --json` | `Read('issues.jsonl')` |
|
||||
| Update status | `ccw issue update <id> --status ...` | Direct file edit |
|
||||
| Bind solution | `ccw issue bind <id> <sol-id>` | Direct file edit |
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Options**:
|
||||
- `--brief`: JSON with minimal fields (id, title, status, priority, tags)
|
||||
- `--json`: Full JSON (agent use only)
|
||||
|
||||
**Orchestration vs Execution**:
|
||||
- **Command (orchestrator)**: Use `--brief` for minimal context
|
||||
- **Agent (executor)**: Fetch full details → `ccw issue status <id> --json`
|
||||
|
||||
**ALWAYS** use CLI commands for CRUD operations. **NEVER** read entire `issues.jsonl` or `solutions/*.jsonl` directly.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/issue:plan [<issue-id>[,<issue-id>,...]] [FLAGS]
|
||||
|
||||
# Examples
|
||||
/issue:plan # Default: --all-pending
|
||||
/issue:plan GH-123 # Single issue
|
||||
/issue:plan GH-123,GH-124,GH-125 # Batch (up to 3)
|
||||
/issue:plan --all-pending # All pending issues (explicit)
|
||||
|
||||
# Flags
|
||||
--batch-size <n> Max issues per agent batch (default: 3)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Process
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Phase 1: Issue Loading & Intelligent Grouping
|
||||
├─ Parse input (single, comma-separated, or --all-pending)
|
||||
├─ Fetch issue metadata (ID, title, tags)
|
||||
├─ Validate issues exist (create if needed)
|
||||
└─ Intelligent grouping via Gemini (semantic similarity, max 3 per batch)
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent)
|
||||
├─ Launch issue-plan-agent per batch
|
||||
├─ Agent performs:
|
||||
│ ├─ ACE semantic search for each issue
|
||||
│ ├─ Codebase exploration (files, patterns, dependencies)
|
||||
│ ├─ Solution generation with task breakdown
|
||||
│ └─ Conflict detection across issues
|
||||
└─ Output: solution JSON per issue
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 3: Solution Registration & Binding
|
||||
├─ Append solutions to solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
|
||||
├─ Single solution per issue → auto-bind
|
||||
├─ Multiple candidates → AskUserQuestion to select
|
||||
└─ Update issues.jsonl with bound_solution_id
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 4: Summary
|
||||
├─ Display bound solutions
|
||||
├─ Show task counts per issue
|
||||
└─ Display next steps (/issue:queue)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Issue Loading (Brief Info Only)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const batchSize = flags.batchSize || 3;
|
||||
let issues = []; // {id, title, tags} - brief info for grouping only
|
||||
|
||||
// Default to --all-pending if no input provided
|
||||
const useAllPending = flags.allPending || !userInput || userInput.trim() === '';
|
||||
|
||||
if (useAllPending) {
|
||||
// Get pending issues with brief metadata via CLI
|
||||
const result = Bash(`ccw issue list --status pending,registered --json`).trim();
|
||||
const parsed = result ? JSON.parse(result) : [];
|
||||
issues = parsed.map(i => ({ id: i.id, title: i.title || '', tags: i.tags || [] }));
|
||||
|
||||
if (issues.length === 0) {
|
||||
console.log('No pending issues found.');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
console.log(`Found ${issues.length} pending issues`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Parse comma-separated issue IDs, fetch brief metadata
|
||||
const ids = userInput.includes(',')
|
||||
? userInput.split(',').map(s => s.trim())
|
||||
: [userInput.trim()];
|
||||
|
||||
for (const id of ids) {
|
||||
Bash(`ccw issue init ${id} --title "Issue ${id}" 2>/dev/null || true`);
|
||||
const info = Bash(`ccw issue status ${id} --json`).trim();
|
||||
const parsed = info ? JSON.parse(info) : {};
|
||||
issues.push({ id, title: parsed.title || '', tags: parsed.tags || [] });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Note: Agent fetches full issue content via `ccw issue status <id> --json`
|
||||
|
||||
// Intelligent grouping: Analyze issues by title/tags, group semantically similar ones
|
||||
// Strategy: Same module/component, related bugs, feature clusters
|
||||
// Constraint: Max ${batchSize} issues per batch
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`Processing ${issues.length} issues in ${batches.length} batch(es)`);
|
||||
|
||||
TodoWrite({
|
||||
todos: batches.map((_, i) => ({
|
||||
content: `Plan batch ${i+1}`,
|
||||
status: 'pending',
|
||||
activeForm: `Planning batch ${i+1}`
|
||||
}))
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent) - PARALLEL
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p .workflow/issues/solutions`);
|
||||
const pendingSelections = []; // Collect multi-solution issues for user selection
|
||||
const agentResults = []; // Collect all agent results for conflict aggregation
|
||||
|
||||
// Build prompts for all batches
|
||||
const agentTasks = batches.map((batch, batchIndex) => {
|
||||
const issueList = batch.map(i => `- ${i.id}: ${i.title}${i.tags.length ? ` [${i.tags.join(', ')}]` : ''}`).join('\n');
|
||||
const batchIds = batch.map(i => i.id);
|
||||
|
||||
const issuePrompt = `
|
||||
## Plan Issues
|
||||
|
||||
**Issues** (grouped by similarity):
|
||||
${issueList}
|
||||
|
||||
**Project Root**: ${process.cwd()}
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Context (MANDATORY)
|
||||
1. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack, architecture)
|
||||
2. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (constraints and conventions)
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
1. Fetch issue details: ccw issue status <id> --json
|
||||
2. **Analyze failure history** (if issue.feedback exists):
|
||||
- Extract failure details from issue.feedback (type='failure', stage='execute')
|
||||
- Parse error_type, message, task_id, solution_id from content JSON
|
||||
- Identify failure patterns: repeated errors, root causes, blockers
|
||||
- **Constraint**: Avoid repeating failed approaches
|
||||
3. Load project context files
|
||||
4. Explore codebase (ACE semantic search)
|
||||
5. Plan solution with tasks (schema: solution-schema.json)
|
||||
- **If previous solution failed**: Reference failure analysis in solution.approach
|
||||
- Add explicit verification steps to prevent same failure mode
|
||||
6. **If github_url exists**: Add final task to comment on GitHub issue
|
||||
7. Write solution to: .workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
|
||||
8. **CRITICAL - Binding Decision**:
|
||||
- Single solution → **MUST execute**: ccw issue bind <issue-id> <solution-id>
|
||||
- Multiple solutions → Return pending_selection only (no bind)
|
||||
|
||||
### Failure-Aware Planning Rules
|
||||
- **Extract failure patterns**: Parse issue.feedback where type='failure' and stage='execute'
|
||||
- **Identify root causes**: Analyze error_type (test_failure, compilation, timeout, etc.)
|
||||
- **Design alternative approach**: Create solution that addresses root cause
|
||||
- **Add prevention steps**: Include explicit verification to catch same error earlier
|
||||
- **Document lessons**: Reference previous failures in solution.approach
|
||||
|
||||
### Rules
|
||||
- Solution ID format: SOL-{issue-id}-{uid} (uid: 4 random alphanumeric chars, e.g., a7x9)
|
||||
- Single solution per issue → auto-bind via ccw issue bind
|
||||
- Multiple solutions → register only, return pending_selection
|
||||
- Tasks must have quantified acceptance.criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Return Summary
|
||||
{"bound":[{"issue_id":"...","solution_id":"...","task_count":N}],"pending_selection":[{"issue_id":"...","solutions":[{"id":"...","description":"...","task_count":N}]}]}
|
||||
`;
|
||||
|
||||
return { batchIndex, batchIds, issuePrompt, batch };
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Launch agents in parallel (max 10 concurrent)
|
||||
const MAX_PARALLEL = 10;
|
||||
for (let i = 0; i < agentTasks.length; i += MAX_PARALLEL) {
|
||||
const chunk = agentTasks.slice(i, i + MAX_PARALLEL);
|
||||
const taskIds = [];
|
||||
|
||||
// Launch chunk in parallel
|
||||
for (const { batchIndex, batchIds, issuePrompt, batch } of chunk) {
|
||||
updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'in_progress');
|
||||
const taskId = Task(
|
||||
subagent_type="issue-plan-agent",
|
||||
run_in_background=true,
|
||||
description=`Explore & plan ${batch.length} issues: ${batchIds.join(', ')}`,
|
||||
prompt=issuePrompt
|
||||
);
|
||||
taskIds.push({ taskId, batchIndex });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`Launched ${taskIds.length} agents (batch ${i/MAX_PARALLEL + 1}/${Math.ceil(agentTasks.length/MAX_PARALLEL)})...`);
|
||||
|
||||
// Collect results from this chunk
|
||||
for (const { taskId, batchIndex } of taskIds) {
|
||||
const result = TaskOutput(task_id=taskId, block=true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract JSON from potential markdown code blocks (agent may wrap in ```json...```)
|
||||
const jsonText = extractJsonFromMarkdown(result);
|
||||
let summary;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
summary = JSON.parse(jsonText);
|
||||
} catch (e) {
|
||||
console.log(`⚠ Batch ${batchIndex + 1}: Failed to parse agent result, skipping`);
|
||||
updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'completed');
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
agentResults.push(summary); // Store for Phase 3 conflict aggregation
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify binding for bound issues (agent should have executed bind)
|
||||
for (const item of summary.bound || []) {
|
||||
const status = JSON.parse(Bash(`ccw issue status ${item.issue_id} --json`).trim());
|
||||
if (status.bound_solution_id === item.solution_id) {
|
||||
console.log(`✓ ${item.issue_id}: ${item.solution_id} (${item.task_count} tasks)`);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Fallback: agent failed to bind, execute here
|
||||
Bash(`ccw issue bind ${item.issue_id} ${item.solution_id}`);
|
||||
console.log(`✓ ${item.issue_id}: ${item.solution_id} (${item.task_count} tasks) [recovered]`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Collect pending selections for Phase 3
|
||||
for (const pending of summary.pending_selection || []) {
|
||||
pendingSelections.push(pending);
|
||||
}
|
||||
updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'completed');
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Solution Selection (if pending)
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Handle multi-solution issues
|
||||
for (const pending of pendingSelections) {
|
||||
if (pending.solutions.length === 0) continue;
|
||||
|
||||
const options = pending.solutions.slice(0, 4).map(sol => ({
|
||||
label: `${sol.id} (${sol.task_count} tasks)`,
|
||||
description: sol.description || sol.approach || 'No description'
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Issue ${pending.issue_id}: which solution to bind?`,
|
||||
header: pending.issue_id,
|
||||
options: options,
|
||||
multiSelect: false
|
||||
}]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const selected = answer[Object.keys(answer)[0]];
|
||||
if (!selected || selected === 'Other') continue;
|
||||
|
||||
const solId = selected.split(' ')[0];
|
||||
Bash(`ccw issue bind ${pending.issue_id} ${solId}`);
|
||||
console.log(`✓ ${pending.issue_id}: ${solId} bound`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Summary
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Count planned issues via CLI
|
||||
const planned = JSON.parse(Bash(`ccw issue list --status planned --brief`) || '[]');
|
||||
const plannedCount = planned.length;
|
||||
|
||||
console.log(`
|
||||
## Done: ${issues.length} issues → ${plannedCount} planned
|
||||
|
||||
Next: \`/issue:queue\` → \`/issue:execute\`
|
||||
`);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Resolution |
|
||||
|-------|------------|
|
||||
| Issue not found | Auto-create in issues.jsonl |
|
||||
| ACE search fails | Agent falls back to ripgrep |
|
||||
| No solutions generated | Display error, suggest manual planning |
|
||||
| User cancels selection | Skip issue, continue with others |
|
||||
| File conflicts | Agent detects and suggests resolution order |
|
||||
|
||||
## Bash Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Avoid**: `$(cmd)`, `$var`, `for` loops — will be escaped incorrectly
|
||||
|
||||
**Use**: Simple commands + `&&` chains, quote comma params `"pending,registered"`
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before completing, verify:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All input issues have solutions in `solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl`
|
||||
- [ ] Single solution issues are auto-bound (`bound_solution_id` set)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-solution issues returned in `pending_selection` for user choice
|
||||
- [ ] Each solution has executable tasks with `modification_points`
|
||||
- [ ] Task acceptance criteria are quantified (not vague)
|
||||
- [ ] Conflicts detected and reported (if multiple issues touch same files)
|
||||
- [ ] Issue status updated to `planned` after binding
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue from bound solutions
|
||||
- `ccw issue list` - List all issues
|
||||
- `ccw issue status` - View issue and solution details
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user