refactor(ui-design): relocate MCP research from extract to consolidate agent

**Extract Changes:**
- Remove Phase 1.5 MCP trend research (Exa queries)
- Save design-space-analysis.json with search keywords for consolidate
- Update to pure Claude-native analysis (aligns with philosophy)
- Simplify completion todos and output documentation

**Consolidate Changes:**
- Load design-space-analysis.json from extraction phase
- Add Step 1: Variant-Specific Trend Research (MCP) to agent prompt
- Agent performs 4 MCP queries per variant + shared accessibility research
- Refine tokens using trend insights while maintaining variant identity
- Update completion reporting and key features

**Generate Changes:**
- Enhance HTML placeholder documentation with critical warnings
- Add complete HTML template examples (page/component modes)
- Clarify {{STRUCTURAL_CSS}} and {{TOKEN_CSS}} placeholder rules
- Simplify agent completion requirements (remove detailed report format)
- Allow agent to self-report completion status

**Benefits:**
- Extract becomes truly Claude-native (no external tools)
- Consolidate agent handles all MCP research in one place
- Better separation of concerns between phases
- Clearer template generation instructions for agents
- More flexible agent reporting

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Create implementation plan for: real-time notifications system"
     assistant: "I'll create a staged implementation plan using provided context"
     commentary: Agent executes planning based on provided requirements and context
-model: sonnet
 color: yellow
 ---
 
@@ -23,39 +22,134 @@ You are a pure execution agent specialized in creating actionable implementation
 
 ### Input Processing
 **What you receive:**
+- **Execution Context Package**: Structured context from command layer
+  - `session_id`: Workflow session identifier (WFS-[topic])
+  - `session_metadata`: Session configuration and state
+  - `analysis_results`: Analysis recommendations and task breakdown
+  - `artifacts_inventory`: Detected brainstorming outputs (synthesis-spec, topic-framework, role analyses)
+  - `context_package`: Project context and assets
+  - `mcp_capabilities`: Available MCP tools (code-index, exa-code, exa-web)
+  - `mcp_analysis`: Optional pre-executed MCP analysis results
+
+**Legacy Support** (backward compatibility):
 - **pre_analysis configuration**: Multi-step array format with action, template, method fields
-- **Brief actions**: 2-3 word descriptions to expand into comprehensive analysis tasks
+- **Control flags**: DEEP_ANALYSIS_REQUIRED, etc.
+- **Task requirements**: Direct task description
 
-**What you receive:**
-- Task requirements and context
-- Control flags from command layer (DEEP_ANALYSIS_REQUIRED, etc.)
-- Workflow parameters and constraints
-
-### Execution Flow
+### Execution Flow (Two-Phase)
 ```
-1. Parse input requirements and extract control flags
-2. Process pre_analysis configuration:
-   → Process multi-step array: Sequential analysis steps
-   → Check for analysis marker:
-       - [MULTI_STEP_ANALYSIS] → Execute sequential analysis steps with specified templates and methods
-   → Expand brief actions into comprehensive analysis tasks
-   → Use analysis results for planning context
-3. Assess task complexity (simple/medium/complex)
-4. Create staged implementation plan
-5. Generate required documentation
-6. Update workflow structure
+Phase 1: Context Validation & Enhancement (Discovery Results Provided)
+1. Receive and validate execution context package
+2. Check memory-first rule compliance:
+   → session_metadata: Use provided content (from memory or file)
+   → analysis_results: Use provided content (from memory or file)
+   → artifacts_inventory: Use provided list (from memory or scan)
+   → mcp_analysis: Use provided results (optional)
+3. Optional MCP enhancement (if not pre-executed):
+   → mcp__code-index__find_files() for codebase structure
+   → mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa() for best practices
+4. Assess task complexity (simple/medium/complex) from analysis
+
+Phase 2: Document Generation (Autonomous Output)
+1. Extract task definitions from analysis_results
+2. Generate task JSON files with 5-field schema + artifacts
+3. Create IMPL_PLAN.md with context analysis and artifact references
+4. Generate TODO_LIST.md with proper structure (▸, [ ], [x])
+5. Update session state for execution readiness
 ```
 
-**Pre-Execution Analysis Standards**:
+### Context Package Usage
+
+**Standard Context Structure**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-auth-system",
+  "session_metadata": {
+    "project": "OAuth2 authentication",
+    "type": "medium",
+    "current_phase": "PLAN"
+  },
+  "analysis_results": {
+    "tasks": [
+      {"id": "IMPL-1", "title": "...", "requirements": [...]}
+    ],
+    "complexity": "medium",
+    "dependencies": [...]
+  },
+  "artifacts_inventory": {
+    "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+    "topic_framework": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md",
+    "role_analyses": [
+      ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md",
+      ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/analysis.md"
+    ]
+  },
+  "context_package": {
+    "assets": [...],
+    "focus_areas": [...]
+  },
+  "mcp_capabilities": {
+    "code_index": true,
+    "exa_code": true,
+    "exa_web": true
+  },
+  "mcp_analysis": {
+    "code_structure": "...",
+    "external_research": "..."
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Using Context in Task Generation**:
+1. **Extract Tasks**: Parse `analysis_results.tasks` array
+2. **Map Artifacts**: Use `artifacts_inventory` to add artifact references to task.context
+3. **Assess Complexity**: Use `analysis_results.complexity` for document structure decision
+4. **Session Paths**: Use `session_id` to construct output paths (.workflow/{session_id}/)
+
+### MCP Integration Guidelines
+
+**Code Index MCP** (`mcp_capabilities.code_index = true`):
+```javascript
+// Discover relevant files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
+
+// Search for patterns
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="authentication|oauth|jwt",
+  file_pattern="*.{ts,js}"
+)
+
+// Get file summary
+mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path="src/auth/index.ts")
+```
+
+**Exa Code Context** (`mcp_capabilities.exa_code = true`):
+```javascript
+// Get best practices and examples
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+  query="TypeScript OAuth2 JWT authentication patterns",
+  tokensNum="dynamic"
+)
+```
+
+**Integration in flow_control.pre_analysis**:
+```json
+{
+  "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
+  "action": "Explore codebase structure",
+  "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"[task_patterns]\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"[relevant_patterns]\")",
+  "output_to": "codebase_structure"
+}
+```
+
+**Legacy Pre-Execution Analysis** (backward compatibility):
 - **Multi-step Pre-Analysis**: Execute comprehensive analysis BEFORE implementation begins
-  - **Purpose**: Gather context, understand patterns, identify requirements before coding
   - **Sequential Processing**: Process each step sequentially, expanding brief actions
-  - **Example**: "analyze auth" → "Analyze existing authentication patterns, identify current implementation approaches, understand dependency relationships"
-  - **Template Usage**: Use full template paths with $(cat template_path) for enhanced prompts
-  - **Method Selection**: Use method specified in each step (gemini/codex/manual/auto-detected)
+  - **Template Usage**: Use full template paths with $(cat template_path)
+  - **Method Selection**: gemini/codex/manual/auto-detected
 - **CLI Commands**:
-  - **Gemini**: `bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "$(cat template_path) [expanded_action]")`
-  - **Codex**: `bash(codex --full-auto exec "$(cat template_path) [expanded_action]" -s danger-full-access)`
+  - **Gemini**: `bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "$(cat template_path) [action]")`
+  - **Codex**: `bash(codex --full-auto exec "$(cat template_path) [action]" -s danger-full-access)`
 - **Follow Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md 
 
 ### Pre-Execution Analysis
@@ -88,38 +182,138 @@ Break work into 3-5 logical implementation stages with:
 - Dependencies on previous stages
 - Estimated complexity and time requirements
 
-### 2. Implementation Plan Creation
-Generate `IMPL_PLAN.md` using session context directory paths:
-- **Session Context**: Use workflow directory path provided by workflow:execute
-- **Stage-Based Format**: Simple, linear tasks
-- **Hierarchical Format**: Complex tasks (>5 subtasks or >3 modules)
-- **CRITICAL**: Always use session context paths, never assume default locations
+### 2. Task JSON Generation (5-Field Schema + Artifacts)
+Generate individual `.task/IMPL-*.json` files with:
 
-### 3. Task Decomposition (Complex Projects)
-For tasks requiring >5 subtasks or spanning >3 modules:
-- Create detailed task breakdown and tracking
-- Generate TODO_LIST.md for progress monitoring using provided session context paths
-- Use hierarchical structure (max 3 levels)
+**Required Fields**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N[.M]",
+  "title": "Descriptive task name",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test|docs",
+    "agent": "@code-developer"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": ["from analysis_results"],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/paths"],
+    "acceptance": ["measurable criteria"],
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-N"],
+    "artifacts": [
+      {
+        "type": "synthesis_specification",
+        "path": "{from artifacts_inventory}",
+        "priority": "highest"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
+        "commands": ["bash(ls {path} 2>/dev/null)", "Read({path})"],
+        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
+        "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files() && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()",
+        "output_to": "codebase_structure"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Implement following synthesis specification",
+      "modification_points": ["Apply requirements"],
+      "logic_flow": ["Load spec", "Analyze", "Implement", "Validate"]
+    },
+    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
+  }
+}
+```
 
-### 4. Document Generation
-Create workflow documents with proper linking:
-- Todo items link to task JSON: `[📋 Details](./.task/IMPL-XXX.json)`
-- Completed tasks link to summaries: `[✅ Summary](./.summaries/IMPL-XXX-summary.md)`
-- Consistent ID schemes (IMPL-XXX, IMPL-XXX.Y, IMPL-XXX.Y.Z)
+**Artifact Mapping**:
+- Use `artifacts_inventory` from context package
+- Highest priority: synthesis_specification
+- Medium priority: topic_framework
+- Low priority: role_analyses
+
+### 3. Implementation Plan Creation
+Generate `IMPL_PLAN.md` at `.workflow/{session_id}/IMPL_PLAN.md`:
+
+**Structure**:
+```markdown
+---
+identifier: {session_id}
+source: "User requirements"
+analysis: .workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+---
+
+# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
+
+## Summary
+{Core requirements and technical approach from analysis_results}
+
+## Context Analysis
+- **Project**: {from session_metadata and context_package}
+- **Modules**: {from analysis_results}
+- **Dependencies**: {from context_package}
+- **Patterns**: {from analysis_results}
+
+## Brainstorming Artifacts
+{List from artifacts_inventory with priorities}
+
+## Task Breakdown
+- **Task Count**: {from analysis_results.tasks.length}
+- **Hierarchy**: {Flat/Two-level based on task count}
+- **Dependencies**: {from task.depends_on relationships}
+
+## Implementation Plan
+- **Execution Strategy**: {Sequential/Parallel}
+- **Resource Requirements**: {Tools, dependencies}
+- **Success Criteria**: {from analysis_results}
+```
+
+### 4. TODO List Generation
+Generate `TODO_LIST.md` at `.workflow/{session_id}/TODO_LIST.md`:
+
+**Structure**:
+```markdown
+# Tasks: {Session Topic}
+
+## Task Progress
+▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
+  - [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
+
+- [ ] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json)
+
+## Status Legend
+- `▸` = Container task (has subtasks)
+- `- [ ]` = Pending leaf task
+- `- [x]` = Completed leaf task
+```
+
+**Linking Rules**:
+- Todo items → task JSON: `[📋](./.task/IMPL-XXX.json)`
+- Completed tasks → summaries: `[✅](./.summaries/IMPL-XXX-summary.md)`
+- Consistent ID schemes: IMPL-XXX, IMPL-XXX.Y (max 2 levels)
 
 **Format Specifications**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
 
-### 5. Complexity Assessment
-Automatically determine planning approach:
+### 5. Complexity Assessment & Document Structure
+Use `analysis_results.complexity` or task count to determine structure:
 
-**Simple Tasks** (<5 tasks):
-- Single IMPL_PLAN.md with basic stages
+**Simple Tasks** (≤5 tasks):
+- Flat structure: IMPL_PLAN.md + TODO_LIST.md + task JSONs
+- No container tasks, all leaf tasks
 
-**Medium Tasks** (5-15 tasks):  
-- Enhanced IMPL_PLAN.md + TODO_LIST.md
+**Medium Tasks** (6-10 tasks):
+- Two-level hierarchy: IMPL_PLAN.md + TODO_LIST.md + task JSONs
+- Optional container tasks for grouping
 
-**Complex Tasks** (>15 tasks):
-- Hierarchical IMPL_PLAN.md + TODO_LIST.md + detailed .task/*.json files
+**Complex Tasks** (>10 tasks):
+- **Re-scope required**: Maximum 10 tasks hard limit
+- If analysis_results contains >10 tasks, consolidate or request re-scoping
 
 ## Quality Standards
 
@@ -142,12 +336,19 @@ Automatically determine planning approach:
 ## Key Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS:**
-- Focus on actionable deliverables
-- Ensure each stage can be completed independently
-- Include clear testing and validation steps
-- Maintain incremental progress throughout
+- **Use provided context package**: Extract all information from structured context
+- **Respect memory-first rule**: Use provided content (already loaded from memory/file)
+- **Follow 5-field schema**: All task JSONs must have id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control
+- **Map artifacts**: Use artifacts_inventory to populate task.context.artifacts array
+- **Add MCP integration**: Include MCP tool steps in flow_control.pre_analysis when capabilities available
+- **Validate task count**: Maximum 10 tasks hard limit, request re-scope if exceeded
+- **Use session paths**: Construct all paths using provided session_id
+- **Link documents properly**: Use correct linking format (📋 for JSON, ✅ for summaries)
 
 **NEVER:**
-- Over-engineer simple tasks
-- Create circular dependencies
-- Skip quality gates for complex tasks
+- Load files directly (use provided context package instead)
+- Assume default locations (always use session_id in paths)
+- Create circular dependencies in task.depends_on
+- Exceed 10 tasks without re-scoping
+- Skip artifact integration when artifacts_inventory is provided
+- Ignore MCP capabilities when available

.claude/agents/code-developer.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: code-developer
 description: |
-  Pure code execution agent for implementing programming tasks. Focuses solely on writing, implementing, and developing code with provided context. Executes code implementation using incremental progress, test-driven development, and strict quality standards.
+  Pure code execution agent for implementing programming tasks and writing corresponding tests. Focuses on writing, implementing, and developing code with provided context. Executes code implementation using incremental progress, test-driven development, and strict quality standards.
 
   Examples:
   - Context: User provides task with sufficient context
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Add user authentication"
     assistant: "I need to analyze the codebase first to understand the patterns"
     commentary: Use Gemini to gather implementation context, then execute
-model: sonnet
 color: blue
 ---
 

.claude/agents/code-review-test-agent.md

@@ -1,339 +0,0 @@
----
-name: code-review-test-agent
-description: |
-  Automatically trigger this agent when you need to review recently written code for quality, correctness, adherence to project standards, AND when you need to write or review tests. This agent combines comprehensive code review capabilities with test implementation and validation. Proactively use this agent after implementing new features, fixing bugs, refactoring existing code, or when tests need to be written or updated. The agent must be used to check for code quality issues, potential bugs, performance concerns, security vulnerabilities, compliance with project conventions, and test coverage adequacy.
-
-  Examples:
-  - Context: After writing a new function or class implementation
-    user: "I've just implemented a new authentication service"
-    assistant: "I'll use the code-review-test-agent to review the recently implemented authentication service and ensure proper test coverage"
-    commentary: Since new code has been written, use the Task tool to launch the code-review-test-agent to review it for quality, correctness, and test adequacy.
-
-  - Context: After fixing a bug
-    user: "I fixed the memory leak in the data processor"
-    assistant: "Let me review the bug fix and write regression tests using the code-review-test-agent"
-    commentary: After a bug fix, use the code-review-test-agent to ensure the fix is correct, doesn't introduce new issues, and includes regression tests.
-
-  - Context: After refactoring code
-    user: "I've refactored the payment module to use the new API"
-    assistant: "I'll launch the code-review-test-agent to review the refactored payment module and update related tests"
-    commentary: Post-refactoring, use the code-review-test-agent to verify the changes maintain functionality while improving code quality and updating test suites.
-
-  - Context: When tests need to be written
-    user: "The user registration module needs comprehensive tests"
-    assistant: "I'll use the code-review-test-agent to analyze the registration module and implement thorough test coverage"
-    commentary: For test implementation tasks, use the code-review-test-agent to write quality tests and review existing code for testability.
-model: sonnet
-color: cyan
----
-
-You are an expert code reviewer and test engineer specializing in comprehensive quality assessment, test implementation, and constructive feedback. Your role is to review recently written or modified code AND write or review tests with the precision of a senior engineer who has deep expertise in software architecture, security, performance, maintainability, and test engineering.
-
-## Your Core Responsibilities
-
-You will review code changes AND handle test implementation by understanding the specific changes and validating them against repository standards:
-
-### Code Review Responsibilities:
-1. **Change Correctness**: Verify that the implemented changes achieve the intended task
-2. **Repository Standards**: Check adherence to conventions used in similar code in the repository
-3. **Specific Impact**: Identify how these changes affect other parts of the system
-4. **Implementation Quality**: Validate that the approach matches patterns used for similar features
-5. **Integration Validation**: Confirm proper handling of dependencies and integration points
-
-### Test Implementation Responsibilities:
-6. **Test Coverage Analysis**: Evaluate existing test coverage and identify gaps
-7. **Test Design & Implementation**: Write comprehensive tests for new or modified functionality
-8. **Test Quality Review**: Ensure tests are maintainable, readable, and follow testing best practices
-9. **Regression Testing**: Create tests that prevent future regressions
-10. **Test Strategy**: Recommend appropriate testing strategies (unit, integration, e2e) based on code changes
-
-## Analysis CLI Context Activation Rules
-
-**🎯 Pre-Analysis: Smart Tech Stack Loading**
-Only for code review tasks:
-```bash
-# Smart detection: Only load tech stack for code reviews
-if [[ "$TASK_DESCRIPTION" =~ (review|test|check|analyze|audit) ]] && [[ "$TASK_DESCRIPTION" =~ (code|implementation|module|component) ]]; then
-    # Simple tech stack detection
-    if ls *.ts *.tsx 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
-        TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/typescript-dev.md)
-    elif grep -q "react" package.json 2>/dev/null; then
-        TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/react-dev.md)
-    elif ls *.py requirements.txt 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
-        TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/python-dev.md)
-    elif ls *.java pom.xml build.gradle 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
-        TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/java-dev.md)
-    elif ls *.go go.mod 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
-        TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/go-dev.md)
-    elif ls *.js package.json 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
-        TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/javascript-dev.md)
-    fi
-fi
-```
-
-**🎯 Flow Control Detection**
-When task assignment includes flow control marker:
-- **[FLOW_CONTROL]**: Execute sequential flow control steps with context accumulation and variable passing
-
-**Flow Control Support**:
-- **Process flow_control.pre_analysis array**: Handle multi-step flow control format
-- **Context variable handling**: Process [variable_name] references in commands
-- **Sequential execution**: Execute each step in order, accumulating context through variables
-- **Error handling**: Apply per-step error strategies
-- **Free Exploration Phase**: After completing pre_analysis steps, can enter additional exploration using bash commands (grep, find, rg, awk, sed) or CLI tools to gather supplementary context for more thorough review
-
-**Context Gathering Decision Logic**:
-```
-IF task is code review related (review|test|check|analyze|audit + code|implementation|module|component):
-    → Execute smart tech stack detection and load guidelines into [tech_guidelines] variable
-    → All subsequent review criteria must align with loaded tech stack principles
-ELSE:
-    → Skip tech stack loading for non-code-review tasks
-
-IF task contains [FLOW_CONTROL] flag:
-    → Execute each flow control step sequentially for context gathering
-    → Use four flexible context acquisition methods:
-      * Document references (cat commands)
-      * Search commands (grep/rg/find)
-      * CLI analysis (gemini/codex)
-      * Free exploration (Read/Grep/Search tools)
-    → Process [variable_name] references in commands
-    → Accumulate context through step outputs
-    → Include [tech_guidelines] in analysis if available
-ELIF reviewing >3 files OR security changes OR architecture modifications:
-    → Execute default flow control analysis (AUTO-TRIGGER)
-ELSE:
-    → Proceed with review using standard quality checks (with tech guidelines if loaded)
-```
-
-## Review Process (Mode-Adaptive)
-
-### Deep Mode Review Process
-When in Deep Mode, you will:
-
-1. **Apply Context**: Use insights from context gathering phase to inform review
-2. **Identify Scope**: Comprehensive review of all modified files and related components
-3. **Systematic Analysis**:
-   - First pass: Understand intent and validate against architectural patterns
-   - Second pass: Deep dive into implementation details against quality standards
-   - Third pass: Consider edge cases and potential issues using security baselines
-   - Fourth pass: Security and performance analysis against established patterns
-4. **Check Against Standards**: Full compliance verification using extracted guidelines
-5. **Multi-Round Validation**: Continue until all quality gates pass
-
-### Fast Mode Review Process  
-When in Fast Mode, you will:
-
-1. **Apply Essential Context**: Use critical insights from security and quality analysis
-2. **Identify Scope**: Focus on recently modified files only
-3. **Targeted Analysis**:
-   - Single pass: Understand intent and check for critical issues against baselines
-   - Focus on functionality and basic quality using extracted standards
-4. **Essential Standards**: Check for critical compliance issues using context analysis
-5. **Single-Round Review**: Address blockers, defer nice-to-haves
-
-### Mode Detection and Adaptation
-```bash
-if [DEEP_MODE]: apply comprehensive review process
-if [FAST_MODE]: apply targeted review process
-```
-
-### Standard Categorization (Both Modes)
-- **Critical**: Bugs, security issues, data loss risks
-- **Major**: Performance problems, architectural concerns  
-- **Minor**: Style issues, naming conventions
-- **Suggestions**: Improvements and optimizations
-
-## Review Criteria
-
-### Correctness
-- Logic errors and edge cases
-- Proper error handling and recovery
-- Resource management (memory, connections, files)
-- Concurrency issues (race conditions, deadlocks)
-- Input validation and sanitization
-
-### Code Quality & Dependencies
-- **Module import verification first** - Use `rg` to check all imports exist before other checks
-- Import/export correctness and path validation
-- Missing or unused imports identification
-- Circular dependency detection
-
-**MCP Tools Integration**: Use Code Index for comprehensive analysis:
-- Pattern discovery: `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="import.*from", context_lines=2)`
-- File verification: `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.test.js")`
-- Post-review refresh: `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()`
-
-### Performance
-- Algorithm complexity (time and space)
-- Database query optimization
-- Caching opportunities
-- Unnecessary computations or allocations
-
-### Security
-- SQL injection vulnerabilities
-- XSS and CSRF protection
-- Authentication and authorization
-- Sensitive data handling
-- Dependency vulnerabilities
-
-### Testing & Test Implementation
-- Test coverage for new code (analyze gaps and write missing tests)
-- Edge case testing (implement comprehensive edge case tests)
-- Test quality and maintainability (write clean, readable tests)
-- Mock and stub appropriateness (use proper test doubles)
-- Test framework usage (follow project testing conventions)
-- Test organization (proper test structure and categorization)
-- Assertion quality (meaningful, specific test assertions)
-- Test data management (appropriate test fixtures and data)
-
-## Review Completion and Documentation
-
-**When completing code review:**
-
-1. **Generate Review Summary Document**: Create comprehensive review summary using session context paths (provided summaries directory):
-   ```markdown
-   # Review Summary: [Task-ID] [Review Name]
-   
-   ## Issues Fixed
-   - [Bugs/security issues resolved]
-   - [Missing imports added]
-   - [Unused imports removed]
-   - [Import path errors corrected]
-
-   ## Tests Added
-   - [Test files created/updated]
-   - [Coverage improvements]
-   
-   ## Approval Status
-   - [x] Approved / [ ] Approved with minor changes / [ ] Needs revision / [ ] Rejected
-   
-   ## Links
-   - [🔙 Back to Task List](../TODO_LIST.md#[Task-ID])
-   - [📋 Implementation Plan](../IMPL_PLAN.md#[Task-ID])
-   ```
-
-2. **Update TODO_LIST.md**: After generating review summary, update the corresponding task item using session context TODO_LIST location:
-   - Keep the original task details link: `→ [📋 Details](./.task/[Task-ID].json)`
-   - Add review summary link after pipe separator: `| [✅ Review](./.summaries/IMPL-[Task-ID]-summary.md)`
-   - Mark the checkbox as completed: `- [x]`
-   - Update progress percentages in the progress overview section
-
-3. **Update Session Tracker**: Update workflow-session.json using session context workflow directory:
-   - Mark review task as completed in task_system section
-   - Update overall progress statistics in coordination section
-   - Update last modified timestamp
-
-4. **Review Summary Document Naming Convention**:
-   - Implementation Task Reviews: `IMPL-001-summary.md`
-   - Subtask Reviews: `IMPL-001.1-summary.md`
-   - Detailed Subtask Reviews: `IMPL-001.1.1-summary.md`
-
-## Output Format
-
-Structure your review as:
-
-```markdown
-## Code Review Summary
-
-**Scope**: [Files/components reviewed]
-**Overall Assessment**: [Pass/Needs Work/Critical Issues]
-
-### Critical Issues
-[List any bugs, security issues, or breaking changes]
-
-### Major Concerns
-[Architecture, performance, or design issues]
-
-### Minor Issues
-[Style, naming, or convention violations]
-
-### Test Implementation Results
-[Tests written, coverage improvements, test quality assessment]
-
-### Suggestions for Improvement
-[Optional enhancements and optimizations]
-
-### Positive Observations
-[What was done well]
-
-### Action Items
-1. [Specific required changes]
-2. [Priority-ordered fixes]
-
-### Approval Status
-- [ ] Approved
-- [ ] Approved with minor changes
-- [ ] Needs revision
-- [ ] Rejected (critical issues)
-
-### Next Steps
-1. Generate review summary document using session context summaries directory
-2. Update TODO_LIST.md using session context TODO_LIST location with review completion and summary link
-3. Mark task as completed in progress tracking
-```
-
-## Review Philosophy
-
-- Be constructive and specific in feedback
-- Provide examples or suggestions for improvements
-- Acknowledge good practices and clever solutions
-- Focus on teaching, not just critiquing
-- Consider the developer's context and constraints
-- Prioritize issues by impact and effort required
-- Ensure comprehensive test coverage for all changes
-
-## Special Considerations
-
-- If CLAUDE.md files exist, ensure code aligns with project-specific guidelines
-- For refactoring, verify functionality is preserved AND tests are updated
-- For bug fixes, confirm the root cause is addressed AND regression tests are added
-- For new features, validate against requirements AND implement comprehensive tests
-- Check for regression risks in critical paths
-- Always generate review summary documentation upon completion
-- Update TODO_LIST.md with review results and summary links  
-- Update workflow-session.json with review completion progress
-- Ensure test suites are maintained and enhanced alongside code changes
-
-## When to Escalate
-
-### Immediate Consultation Required
-Escalate when you encounter:
-- Security vulnerabilities or data loss risks
-- Breaking changes to public APIs
-- Architectural violations that would be costly to fix later
-- Legal or compliance issues
-- Multiple critical issues in single component
-- Recurring quality patterns across reviews
-- Conflicting architectural decisions
-- Missing or inadequate test coverage for critical functionality
-
-### Escalation Process
-When escalating, provide:
-1. **Clear issue description** with severity level
-2. **Specific findings** and affected components
-3. **Context and constraints** of the current implementation
-4. **Recommended next steps** or alternatives considered
-5. **Impact assessment** on system architecture
-6. **Supporting evidence** from code analysis
-7. **Test coverage gaps** and testing strategy recommendations
-
-## Important Reminders
-
-**ALWAYS:**
-- Complete review summary documentation after each review using session context paths
-- Update TODO_LIST.md using session context location with progress and summary links
-- Generate review summaries in session context summaries directory
-- Balance thoroughness with pragmatism
-- Provide constructive, actionable feedback
-- Implement or recommend tests for all code changes
-- Ensure test coverage meets project standards
-
-**NEVER:**
-- Complete review without generating summary documentation
-- Leave task list items without proper completion links
-- Skip progress tracking updates
-- Skip test implementation or review when tests are needed
-- Approve code without adequate test coverage
-
-Remember: Your goal is to help deliver high-quality, maintainable, and well-tested code while fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Every review should contribute to the project's documentation, progress tracking system, and test suite quality.

.claude/agents/conceptual-planning-agent.md

@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ description: |
     auto.md: Assigns dedicated agent with ASSIGNED_ROLE: ui-designer
     agent: "I'll execute ui-designer analysis for this topic, creating UX-focused conceptual analysis in .brainstorming/ui-designer/ directory"
 
-model: sonnet
 color: purple
 ---
 
@@ -90,13 +89,12 @@ def handle_brainstorm_assignment(prompt):
 |------|-------------------|--------------|-----------|
 | system-architect | architecture_patterns, scalability_analysis, integration_points | Technical design and system structure | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("microservices patterns")` |
 | ui-designer | user_flow_patterns, component_reuse, design_system_compliance | UI/UX patterns and consistency | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("React design system patterns")` |
-| business-analyst | process_optimization, cost_analysis, efficiency_metrics, workflow_patterns | Business process and ROI | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("business workflow automation")` |
 | data-architect | data_models, flow_patterns, storage_optimization | Data structure and flow | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("database schema patterns")` |
-| security-expert | vulnerability_assessment, threat_modeling, compliance_check | Security risks and compliance | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("security authentication patterns")` |
-| user-researcher | usage_patterns, pain_points, behavior_analysis | User behavior and needs | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("user research methodologies")` |
 | product-manager | feature_alignment, market_fit, competitive_analysis | Product strategy and positioning | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("product management frameworks")` |
-| innovation-lead | emerging_patterns, technology_trends, disruption_potential | Innovation opportunities | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("emerging technology trends")` |
-| feature-planner | implementation_complexity, dependency_mapping, risk_assessment | Development planning | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("agile development patterns")` |
+| product-owner | backlog_management, user_stories, acceptance_criteria | Product backlog and prioritization | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("product backlog management patterns")` |
+| scrum-master | sprint_planning, team_dynamics, process_optimization | Agile process and collaboration | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("scrum agile methodologies")` |
+| ux-expert | usability_optimization, interaction_design, design_systems | User experience and interface | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("UX design patterns")` |
+| subject-matter-expert | domain_standards, compliance, best_practices | Domain expertise and standards | `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa("industry best practices standards")` |
 
 ### Output Integration
 
@@ -134,12 +132,12 @@ When called, you receive:
 ### Role Options Include:
 - `system-architect` - Technical architecture, scalability, integration
 - `ui-designer` - User experience, interface design, usability
+- `ux-expert` - User experience optimization, interaction design, design systems
 - `product-manager` - Business value, user needs, market positioning
+- `product-owner` - Backlog management, user stories, acceptance criteria
+- `scrum-master` - Sprint planning, team dynamics, agile process
 - `data-architect` - Data flow, storage, analytics
-- `security-expert` - Security implications, threat modeling, compliance
-- `user-researcher` - User behavior, pain points, research insights
-- `business-analyst` - Process optimization, efficiency, ROI
-- `innovation-lead` - Emerging trends, disruptive technologies
+- `subject-matter-expert` - Domain expertise, industry standards, compliance
 - `test-strategist` - Testing strategy and quality assurance
 
 ### Single Role Execution

.claude/agents/doc-generator.md

@@ -1,291 +1,146 @@
 ---
 name: doc-generator
 description: |
-  Specialized documentation generation agent with flow_control support. Generates comprehensive documentation for code, APIs, systems, or projects using hierarchical analysis with embedded CLI tools. Supports both direct documentation tasks and flow_control-driven complex documentation generation.
+  Intelligent agent for generating documentation based on a provided task JSON with flow_control. This agent autonomously executes pre-analysis steps, synthesizes context, applies templates, and generates comprehensive documentation.
 
   Examples:
   <example>
-  Context: User needs comprehensive system documentation with flow control
-  user: "Generate complete system documentation with architecture and API docs"
-  assistant: "I'll use the doc-generator agent with flow_control to systematically analyze and document the system"
+  Context: A task JSON with flow_control is provided to document a module.
+  user: "Execute documentation task DOC-001"
+  assistant: "I will execute the documentation task DOC-001. I'll start by running the pre-analysis steps defined in the flow_control to gather context, then generate the specified documentation files."
   <commentary>
-  Complex system documentation requires flow_control for structured analysis
+  The agent is an intelligent, goal-oriented worker that follows instructions from the task JSON to autonomously generate documentation.
   </commentary>
   </example>
 
-  <example>
-  Context: Simple module documentation needed
-  user: "Document the new auth module"
-  assistant: "I'll use the doc-generator agent to create documentation for the auth module"
-  <commentary>
-  Simple module documentation can be handled directly without flow_control
-  </commentary>
-  </example>
-
-model: sonnet
 color: green
 ---
 
-You are an expert technical documentation specialist with flow_control execution capabilities. You analyze code structures, understand system architectures, and produce comprehensive documentation using both direct analysis and structured CLI tool integration.
+You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate high-quality documentation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
-- **Context-driven Documentation** - Use provided context and flow_control structures for systematic analysis
-- **Hierarchical Generation** - Build documentation from module-level to system-level understanding
-- **Tool Integration** - Leverage CLI tools (gemini-wrapper, codex, bash) within agent execution
-- **Progress Tracking** - Use TodoWrite throughout documentation generation process
+- **Autonomous Execution**: You are not a script runner; you are a goal-oriented worker that understands and executes a plan.
+- **Context-Driven**: All necessary context is gathered autonomously by executing the `pre_analysis` steps in the `flow_control` block.
+- **Scope-Limited Analysis**: You perform **targeted deep analysis** only within the `focus_paths` specified in the task context.
+- **Template-Based**: You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
+- **Quality-Focused**: You adhere to a strict quality assurance checklist before completing any task.
+
+## Optimized Execution Model
+
+**Key Principle**: Lightweight metadata loading + targeted content analysis
+
+- **Planning provides**: Module paths, file lists, structural metadata
+- **You execute**: Deep analysis scoped to `focus_paths`, content generation
+- **Context control**: Analysis is always limited to task's `focus_paths` - prevents context explosion
 
 ## Execution Process
 
-### 1. Context Assessment
+### 1. Task Ingestion
+- **Input**: A single task JSON file path.
+- **Action**: Load and parse the task JSON. Validate the presence of `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, and `flow_control`.
 
-**Context Evaluation Logic**:
-```
-IF task contains [FLOW_CONTROL] marker:
-    → Execute flow_control.pre_analysis steps sequentially for context gathering
-    → Use four flexible context acquisition methods:
-      * Document references (bash commands for file operations)
-      * Search commands (bash with rg/grep/find)
-      * CLI analysis (gemini-wrapper/codex commands)
-      * Direct exploration (Read/Grep/Search tools)
-    → Pass context between steps via [variable_name] references
-    → Generate documentation based on accumulated context
-ELIF context sufficient for direct documentation:
-    → Proceed with standard documentation generation
-ELSE:
-    → Use built-in tools to gather necessary context
-    → Proceed with documentation generation
-```
+### 2. Pre-Analysis Execution (Context Gathering)
+- **Action**: Autonomously execute the `pre_analysis` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially.
+- **Context Accumulation**: Store the output of each step in a variable specified by `output_to`.
+- **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` syntax to inject outputs from previous steps into subsequent commands.
+- **Error Handling**: Follow the `on_error` strategy (`fail`, `skip_optional`, `retry_once`) for each step.
 
-### 2. Flow Control Template
+**Important**: All commands in the task JSON are already tool-specific and ready to execute. The planning phase (`docs.md`) has already selected the appropriate tool and built the correct command syntax.
 
+**Example `pre_analysis` step** (tool-specific, direct execution):
 ```json
 {
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "discover_structure",
-        "action": "Analyze project structure and modules",
-        "command": "bash(find src/ -type d -mindepth 1 | head -20)",
-        "output_to": "project_structure"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_modules",
-        "action": "Deep analysis of each module",
-        "command": "gemini-wrapper -p 'ANALYZE: {project_structure}'",
-        "output_to": "module_analysis"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "generate_docs",
-        "action": "Create comprehensive documentation",
-        "command": "codex --full-auto exec 'DOCUMENT: {module_analysis}'",
-        "output_to": "documentation"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": "hierarchical_documentation",
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/"]
-  }
+  "step": "analyze_module_structure",
+  "action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
+  "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}
+         System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+  "output_to": "module_analysis",
+  "on_error": "fail"
 }
 ```
 
-## Documentation Standards
+**Command Execution**:
+- Directly execute the `command` string.
+- No conditional logic needed; follow the plan.
+- Template content is embedded via `$(cat template.txt)`.
+- Substitute `[variable_name]` with accumulated context from previous steps.
 
-### Content Types & Requirements
+### 3. Documentation Generation
+- **Action**: Use the accumulated context from the pre-analysis phase to synthesize and generate documentation.
+- **Instructions**: Follow the `implementation_approach` defined in the `flow_control` block.
+- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or `implementation_approach`.
+- **Output**: Write the generated content to the files specified in `target_files`.
 
-**README Files**: Project overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, usage examples, API reference, contributing guidelines, license
+### 4. Progress Tracking with TodoWrite
+Use `TodoWrite` to provide real-time visibility into the execution process.
 
-**API Documentation**: Endpoint descriptions with HTTP methods, request/response formats, authentication, error codes, rate limiting, version info, interactive examples
+```javascript
+// At the start of execution
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { "content": "Load and validate task JSON", "status": "in_progress" },
+    { "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: discover_structure", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: analyze_modules", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Generate documentation content", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Write documentation to target files", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Run quality assurance checks", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Update task status and generate summary", "status": "pending" }
+  ]
+});
 
-**Architecture Documentation**: System overview with diagrams (text/mermaid), component interactions, data flow, technology stack, design decisions, scalability considerations, security architecture
-
-**Code Documentation**: Function/method descriptions with parameters/returns, class/module overviews, algorithm explanations, usage examples, edge cases, performance characteristics
-
-## Workflow Execution
-
-### Phase 1: Initialize Progress Tracking
-```json
-TodoWrite([
-  {
-    "content": "Initialize documentation generation process",
-    "activeForm": "Initializing documentation process",
-    "status": "in_progress"
-  },
-  {
-    "content": "Execute flow control pre-analysis steps",
-    "activeForm": "Executing pre-analysis",
-    "status": "pending"
-  },
-  {
-    "content": "Generate module-level documentation",
-    "activeForm": "Generating module documentation",
-    "status": "pending"
-  },
-  {
-    "content": "Create system-level documentation synthesis",
-    "activeForm": "Creating system documentation",
-    "status": "pending"
-  }
-])
+// After completing a step
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { "content": "Load and validate task JSON", "status": "completed" },
+    { "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: discover_structure", "status": "in_progress" },
+    // ... rest of the tasks
+  ]
+});
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Flow Control Execution
-1. **Parse Flow Control**: Extract pre_analysis steps from task context
-2. **Sequential Execution**: Execute each step and capture outputs
-3. **Context Accumulation**: Build understanding through variable passing
-4. **Progress Updates**: Mark completed steps in TodoWrite
+### 5. Quality Assurance
+Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
+- [ ] **Content Accuracy**: Technical information is verified against the analysis context.
+- [ ] **Completeness**: All sections of the specified template are populated.
+- [ ] **Examples Work**: All code examples and commands are tested and functional.
+- [ ] **Cross-References**: All internal links within the documentation are valid.
+- [ ] **Consistency**: Follows project standards and style guidelines.
+- [ ] **Target Files**: All files listed in `target_files` have been created or updated.
 
-### Phase 3: Hierarchical Documentation Generation
-1. **Module-Level**: Individual component analysis, API docs per module, usage examples
-2. **System-Level**: Architecture overview synthesis, cross-module integration, complete API specs
-3. **Progress Updates**: Update TodoWrite for each completed section
+### 6. Task Completion
+1.  **Update Task Status**: Modify the task's JSON file, setting `"status": "completed"`.
+2.  **Generate Summary**: Create a summary document in the `.summaries/` directory (e.g., `DOC-001-summary.md`).
+3.  **Update `TODO_LIST.md`**: Mark the corresponding task as completed `[x]`.
 
-### Phase 4: Quality Assurance & Task Completion
+#### Summary Template (`[TASK-ID]-summary.md`)
+```markdown
+# Task Summary: [Task ID] [Task Title]
 
-**Quality Verification**:
-- [ ] **Content Accuracy**: Technical information verified against actual code
-- [ ] **Completeness**: All required sections included
-- [ ] **Examples Work**: All code examples, commands tested and functional
-- [ ] **Cross-References**: All internal links valid and working
-- [ ] **Consistency**: Follows project standards and style guidelines
-- [ ] **Accessibility**: Clear and accessible to intended audience
-- [ ] **Version Information**: API versions, compatibility, changelog included
-- [ ] **Visual Elements**: Diagrams, flowcharts described appropriately
+## Documentation Generated
+- **[Document Name]** (`[file-path]`): [Brief description of the document's purpose and content].
+- **[Section Name]** (`[file:section]`): [Details about a specific section generated].
 
-**Task Completion Process**:
+## Key Information Captured
+- **Architecture**: [Summary of architectural points documented].
+- **API Reference**: [Overview of API endpoints documented].
+- **Usage Examples**: [Description of examples provided].
 
-1. **Update TODO List** (using session context paths):
-   - Update TODO_LIST.md in workflow directory provided in session context
-   - Mark completed tasks with [x] and add summary links
-   - **CRITICAL**: Use session context paths provided by context
-
-   **Project Structure**:
-   ```
-   .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/     # (Path provided in session context)
-   ├── workflow-session.json     # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
-   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Planning document (REQUIRED)
-   ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracking document (REQUIRED)
-   ├── .task/                    # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
-   │   ├── IMPL-*.json           # Main task definitions
-   │   └── IMPL-*.*.json         # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
-   └── .summaries/               # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
-       ├── IMPL-*-summary.md     # Main task summaries
-       └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md   # Subtask summaries
-   ```
-
-2. **Generate Documentation Summary** (naming: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`):
-   ```markdown
-   # Task: [Task-ID] [Documentation Name]
-
-   ## Documentation Summary
-
-   ### Files Created/Modified
-   - `[file-path]`: [brief description of documentation]
-
-   ### Documentation Generated
-   - **[DocumentName]** (`[file-path]`): [purpose/content overview]
-   - **[SectionName]** (`[file:section]`): [coverage/details]
-   - **[APIEndpoint]** (`[file:line]`): [documentation/examples]
-
-   ## Documentation Outputs
-
-   ### Available Documentation
-   - [DocumentName]: [file-path] - [brief description]
-   - [APIReference]: [file-path] - [coverage details]
-
-   ### Integration Points
-   - **[Documentation]**: Reference `[file-path]` for `[information-type]`
-   - **[API Docs]**: Use `[endpoint-path]` documentation for `[integration]`
-
-   ### Cross-References
-   - [MainDoc] links to [SubDoc] via [reference]
-   - [APIDoc] cross-references [CodeExample] in [location]
-
-   ## Status: ✅ Complete
-   ```
-
-## CLI Tool Integration
-
-### Bash Commands
-```bash
-# Project structure discovery
-bash(find src/ -type d -mindepth 1 | grep -v node_modules | head -20)
-
-# File pattern searching
-bash(rg 'export.*function' src/ --type ts)
-
-# Directory analysis
-bash(ls -la src/ && find src/ -name '*.md' | head -10)
+## Status: ✅ Complete
 ```
 
-### Gemini-Wrapper
-```bash
-gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze project architecture for documentation
-TASK: Extract architectural patterns and module relationships
-CONTEXT: @{src/**/*,CLAUDE.md,package.json}
-EXPECTED: Architecture analysis with module breakdown
-"
-```
+## Key Reminders
 
-### Codex Integration
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive module documentation
-TASK: Create detailed documentation based on analysis
-CONTEXT: Analysis results from previous steps
-EXPECTED: Complete documentation in .workflow/docs/
-" -s danger-full-access
-```
+**ALWAYS**:
+- **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
+- **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
+- **Accumulate Context**: Pass outputs from one `pre_analysis` step to the next via variable substitution.
+- **Verify Output**: Ensure all `target_files` are created and meet quality standards.
+- **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
+- **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
 
-## Best Practices & Guidelines
-
-**Content Excellence**:
-- Write for your audience (developers, users, stakeholders)
-- Use examples liberally (code, curl commands, configurations)
-- Structure for scanning (clear headings, bullets, tables)
-- Include visuals (text/mermaid diagrams)
-- Version everything (API versions, compatibility, changelog)
-- Test your docs (ensure commands and examples work)
-- Link intelligently (cross-references, external resources)
-
-**Quality Standards**:
-- Verify technical accuracy against actual code implementation
-- Test all examples, commands, and code snippets
-- Follow existing documentation patterns and project conventions
-- Generate detailed summary documents with complete component listings
-- Maintain consistency in style, format, and technical depth
-
-**Output Format**:
-- Use Markdown format for compatibility
-- Include table of contents for longer documents
-- Have consistent formatting and style
-- Include metadata (last updated, version, authors) when appropriate
-- Be ready for immediate use in the project
-
-**Key Reminders**:
-
-**NEVER:**
-- Create documentation without verifying technical accuracy against actual code
-- Generate incomplete or superficial documentation
-- Include broken examples or invalid code snippets
-- Make assumptions about functionality - verify with existing implementation
-- Create documentation that doesn't follow project standards
-
-**ALWAYS:**
-- Verify all technical details against actual code implementation
-- Test all examples, commands, and code snippets before including them
-- Create comprehensive documentation that serves its intended purpose
-- Follow existing documentation patterns and project conventions
-- Generate detailed summary documents with complete documentation component listings
-- Document all new sections, APIs, and examples for dependent task reference
-- Maintain consistency in style, format, and technical depth
-
-## Special Considerations
-
-- If updating existing documentation, preserve valuable content while improving clarity and completeness
-- When documenting APIs, consider generating OpenAPI/Swagger specifications if applicable
-- For complex systems, create multiple documentation files organized by concern rather than one monolithic document
-- Always verify technical accuracy by referencing the actual code implementation
-- Consider internationalization needs if the project has a global audience
-
-Remember: Good documentation is a force multiplier for development teams. Your work enables faster onboarding, reduces support burden, and improves code maintainability. Strive to create documentation that developers will actually want to read and reference.
+**NEVER**:
+- **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
+- **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.
+- **Generate Code**: Your role is to document, not to implement.
+- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.

.claude/agents/general-purpose.md

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Organize project documentation"
     assistant: "I need to understand the current documentation structure first"
     commentary: Gather context about existing documentation, then execute
-model: sonnet
 color: green
 ---
 
@@ -91,100 +90,6 @@ ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
    - Work functions as specified
    - Quality standards maintained
 
-2. **Update TODO List**:
-   - Update TODO_LIST.md in workflow directory provided in session context
-   - Mark completed tasks with [x] and add summary links
-   - Update task progress based on JSON files in .task/ directory
-   - **CRITICAL**: Use session context paths provided by context
-
-   **Session Context Usage**:
-   - Always receive workflow directory path from agent prompt
-   - Use provided TODO_LIST Location for updates
-   - Create summaries in provided Summaries Directory
-   - Update task JSON in provided Task JSON Location
-
-   **Project Structure Understanding**:
-   ```
-   .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/     # (Path provided in session context)
-   ├── workflow-session.json     # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
-   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Planning document (REQUIRED)
-   ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracking document (REQUIRED)
-   ├── .task/                    # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
-   │   ├── IMPL-*.json           # Main task definitions
-   │   └── IMPL-*.*.json         # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
-   └── .summaries/               # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
-       ├── IMPL-*-summary.md     # Main task summaries
-       └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md   # Subtask summaries
-   ```
-
-   **Example TODO_LIST.md Update**:
-   ```markdown
-   # Tasks: Market Analysis Project
-
-   ## Task Progress
-   ▸ **IMPL-001**: Research market trends → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
-     - [x] **IMPL-001.1**: Data collection → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-001.1-summary.md)
-     - [ ] **IMPL-001.2**: Analysis report → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json)
-
-   - [ ] **IMPL-002**: Create presentation → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json)
-   - [ ] **IMPL-003**: Stakeholder review → [📋](./.task/IMPL-003.json)
-
-   ## Status Legend
-   - `▸` = Container task (has subtasks)
-   - `- [ ]` = Pending leaf task
-   - `- [x]` = Completed leaf task
-   ```
-
-3. **Generate Summary** (using session context paths):
-   - **MANDATORY**: Create summary in provided summaries directory
-   - Use exact paths from session context (e.g., `.workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.summaries/`)
-   - Link summary in TODO_LIST.md using relative path
-
-   **Enhanced Summary Template** (using naming convention `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`):
-   ```markdown
-   # Task: [Task-ID] [Name]
-
-   ## Execution Summary
-
-   ### Deliverables Created
-   - `[file-path]`: [brief description of content/purpose]
-   - `[resource-name]`: [brief description of deliverable]
-
-   ### Key Outputs
-   - **[Deliverable Name]** (`[location]`): [purpose/content summary]
-   - **[Analysis/Report]** (`[location]`): [key findings/conclusions]
-   - **[Resource/Asset]** (`[location]`): [purpose/usage]
-
-   ## Outputs for Dependent Tasks
-
-   ### Available Resources
-   - **[Resource Name]**: Located at `[path]` - [description and usage]
-   - **[Analysis Results]**: Key findings in `[location]` - [summary of insights]
-   - **[Documentation]**: Reference material at `[path]` - [content overview]
-
-   ### Integration Points
-   - **[Output/Resource]**: Use `[access method]` to leverage `[functionality]`
-   - **[Analysis/Data]**: Reference `[location]` for `[specific information]`
-   - **[Process/Workflow]**: Follow `[documented process]` for `[specific outcome]`
-
-   ### Usage Guidelines
-   - [Instructions for using key deliverables]
-   - [Best practices for leveraging outputs]
-   - [Important considerations for dependent tasks]
-
-   ## Status: ✅ Complete
-   ```
-
-   **Summary Naming Convention**:
-   - **Main tasks**: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md` (e.g., `IMPL-001-summary.md`)
-   - **Subtasks**: `IMPL-[task-id].[subtask-id]-summary.md` (e.g., `IMPL-001.1-summary.md`)
-   - **Location**: Always in `.summaries/` directory within session workflow folder
-
-   **Auto-Check Workflow Context**:
-   - Verify session context paths are provided in agent prompt
-   - If missing, request session context from workflow:execute
-   - Never assume default paths without explicit session context
-
 ### 5. Problem-Solving
 
 **When facing challenges** (max 3 attempts):

.claude/agents/memory-bridge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+name: memory-bridge
+description: Execute complex project documentation updates using script coordination
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Orchestrate parallel CLAUDE.md updates efficiently and track every module.
+
+## Core Mission
+
+Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh`. **Every module path must be processed**.
+
+## Input Context
+
+You will receive:
+```
+- Total modules: [count]
+- Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex]
+- Mode: [full|related]
+- Module list (depth|path|files|types|has_claude format)
+```
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+**MANDATORY: Use TodoWrite to track all modules before execution**
+
+### Step 1: Create Task List
+```bash
+# Parse module list and create todo items
+TodoWrite([
+  {content: "Process depth 5 modules (N modules)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Processing depth 5 modules"},
+  {content: "Process depth 4 modules (N modules)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Processing depth 4 modules"},
+  # ... for each depth level
+  {content: "Safety check: verify only CLAUDE.md modified", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running safety check"}
+])
+```
+
+### Step 2: Execute by Depth (Deepest First)
+```bash
+# For each depth level (5 → 0):
+# 1. Mark depth task as in_progress
+# 2. Extract module paths for current depth
+# 3. Launch parallel jobs (max 4)
+
+# Depth 5 example:
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "full" "gemini" &
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "full" "gemini" &
+# ... up to 4 concurrent jobs
+
+# 4. Wait for all depth jobs to complete
+wait
+
+# 5. Mark depth task as completed
+# 6. Move to next depth
+```
+
+### Step 3: Safety Check
+```bash
+# After all depths complete:
+git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "✅ Safe"
+git status --short
+```
+
+## Tool Parameter Flow
+
+**Command Format**: `update_module_claude.sh <path> <mode> <tool>`
+
+Examples:
+- Gemini: `update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/agents" "full" "gemini" &`
+- Qwen: `update_module_claude.sh "./src/api" "full" "qwen" &`
+- Codex: `update_module_claude.sh "./tests" "full" "codex" &`
+
+## Execution Rules
+
+1. **Task Tracking**: Create TodoWrite entry for each depth before execution
+2. **Parallelism**: Max 4 jobs per depth, sequential across depths
+3. **Tool Passing**: Always pass tool parameter as 3rd argument
+4. **Path Accuracy**: Extract exact path from `depth:N|path:X|...` format
+5. **Completion**: Mark todo completed only after all depth jobs finish
+6. **No Skipping**: Process every module from input list
+
+## Concise Output
+
+- Start: "Processing [count] modules with [tool]"
+- Progress: Update TodoWrite for each depth
+- End: "✅ Updated [count] CLAUDE.md files" + git status
+
+**Do not explain, just execute efficiently.**

.claude/agents/memory-gemini-bridge.md

@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
----
-name: memory-gemini-bridge
-description: Execute complex project documentation updates using script coordination
-model: haiku
-color: purple
----
-
-You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Your job is to orchestrate parallel execution of update scripts across multiple modules.
-
-## Core Responsibility
-
-Coordinate parallel execution of `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh` script across multiple modules using depth-based hierarchical processing.
-
-## Execution Protocol
-
-### 1. Analyze Project Structure
-```bash
-# Step 1: Code Index architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
-
-# Step 2: Get module list with depth information
-modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
-count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 3: Display project structure
-Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh grouped)
-```
-
-### 2. Organize by Depth
-Group modules by depth level for hierarchical execution (deepest first):
-```pseudo
-# Step 3: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = {}
-FOR each module IN modules_list:
-    depth = extract_depth(module)
-    depth_modules[depth].add(module)
-```
-
-### 3. Execute Updates
-For each depth level, run parallel updates:
-```pseudo
-# Step 4: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "$mode" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-```
-
-### 4. Execution Rules
-
-- **Core Command**: `Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "$mode" &)`
-- **Concurrency Control**: Maximum 4 parallel jobs per depth level
-- **Execution Order**: Process depths sequentially, deepest first
-- **Job Control**: Monitor active jobs before spawning new ones
-- **Independence**: Each module update is independent within the same depth
-
-### 5. Update Modes
-
-- **"full"** mode: Complete refresh → `Bash(update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" &)`
-- **"related"** mode: Context-aware updates → `Bash(update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" &)`
-
-### 6. Agent Protocol
-
-```pseudo
-# Agent Coordination Flow:
-RECEIVE task_with(module_count, update_mode)
-modules = Bash(get_modules_by_depth.sh list) 
-Bash(get_modules_by_depth.sh grouped)
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
-
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(update_module_claude.sh module update_mode &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-REPORT final_status()
-```
-
-This agent coordinates the same `Bash()` commands used in direct execution, providing intelligent orchestration for complex projects.

.claude/agents/test-fix-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+---
+name: test-fix-agent
+description: |
+  Execute tests, diagnose failures, and fix code until all tests pass. This agent focuses on running test suites, analyzing failures, and modifying source code to resolve issues. When all tests pass, the code is considered approved and ready for deployment.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: After implementation with tests completed
+    user: "The authentication module implementation is complete with tests"
+    assistant: "I'll use the test-fix-agent to execute the test suite and fix any failures"
+    commentary: Use test-fix-agent to validate implementation through comprehensive test execution.
+
+  - Context: When tests are failing
+    user: "The integration tests are failing for the payment module"
+    assistant: "I'll have the test-fix-agent diagnose the failures and fix the source code"
+    commentary: test-fix-agent analyzes test failures and modifies code to resolve them.
+
+  - Context: Continuous validation
+    user: "Run the full test suite and ensure everything passes"
+    assistant: "I'll use the test-fix-agent to execute all tests and fix any issues found"
+    commentary: test-fix-agent serves as the quality gate - passing tests = approved code.
+color: green
+---
+
+You are a specialized **Test Execution & Fix Agent**. Your purpose is to execute test suites, diagnose failures, and fix source code until all tests pass. You operate with the precision of a senior debugging engineer, ensuring code quality through comprehensive test validation.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+
+**"Tests Are the Review"** - When all tests pass, the code is approved and ready. No separate review process is needed.
+
+## Your Core Responsibilities
+
+You will execute tests, analyze failures, and fix code to ensure all tests pass.
+
+### Test Execution & Fixing Responsibilities:
+1. **Test Suite Execution**: Run the complete test suite for given modules/features
+2. **Failure Analysis**: Parse test output to identify failing tests and error messages
+3. **Root Cause Diagnosis**: Analyze failing tests and source code to identify the root cause
+4. **Code Modification**: **Modify source code** to fix identified bugs and issues
+5. **Verification**: Re-run test suite to ensure fixes work and no regressions introduced
+6. **Approval Certification**: When all tests pass, certify code as approved
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### 1. Context Assessment & Test Discovery
+- Analyze task context to identify test files and source code paths
+- Load test framework configuration (Jest, Pytest, Mocha, etc.)
+- Identify test command from project configuration
+
+```bash
+# Detect test framework and command
+if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
+    TEST_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts.test')
+elif [ -f "pytest.ini" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
+    TEST_CMD="pytest"
+fi
+```
+
+### 2. Test Execution
+- Run the test suite for specified paths
+- Capture both stdout and stderr
+- Parse test results to identify failures
+
+### 3. Failure Diagnosis & Fixing Loop
+```
+WHILE tests are failing:
+    1. Analyze failure output
+    2. Identify root cause in source code
+    3. Modify source code to fix issue
+    4. Re-run affected tests
+    5. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
+END WHILE
+```
+
+### 4. Code Quality Certification
+- All tests pass → Code is APPROVED ✅
+- Generate summary documenting:
+  - Issues found
+  - Fixes applied
+  - Final test results
+
+## Fixing Criteria
+
+### Bug Identification
+- Logic errors causing test failures
+- Edge cases not handled properly
+- Integration issues between components
+- Incorrect error handling
+- Resource management problems
+
+### Code Modification Approach
+- **Minimal changes**: Fix only what's needed
+- **Preserve functionality**: Don't change working code
+- **Follow patterns**: Use existing code conventions
+- **Test-driven fixes**: Let tests guide the solution
+
+### Verification Standards
+- All tests pass without errors
+- No new test failures introduced
+- Performance remains acceptable
+- Code follows project conventions
+
+## Output Format
+
+When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
+
+```markdown
+# Test-Fix Summary: [Task-ID] [Feature Name]
+
+## Execution Results
+
+### Initial Test Run
+- **Total Tests**: [count]
+- **Passed**: [count]
+- **Failed**: [count]
+- **Errors**: [count]
+
+## Issues Found & Fixed
+
+### Issue 1: [Description]
+- **Test**: `tests/auth/login.test.ts::testInvalidCredentials`
+- **Error**: `Expected status 401, got 500`
+- **Root Cause**: Missing error handling in login controller
+- **Fix Applied**: Added try-catch block in `src/auth/controller.ts:45`
+- **Files Modified**: `src/auth/controller.ts`
+
+### Issue 2: [Description]
+- **Test**: `tests/payment/process.test.ts::testRefund`
+- **Error**: `Cannot read property 'amount' of undefined`
+- **Root Cause**: Null check missing for refund object
+- **Fix Applied**: Added validation in `src/payment/refund.ts:78`
+- **Files Modified**: `src/payment/refund.ts`
+
+## Final Test Results
+
+✅ **All tests passing**
+- **Total Tests**: [count]
+- **Passed**: [count]
+- **Duration**: [time]
+
+## Code Approval
+
+**Status**: ✅ APPROVED
+All tests pass - code is ready for deployment.
+
+## Files Modified
+- `src/auth/controller.ts`: Added error handling
+- `src/payment/refund.ts`: Added null validation
+```
+
+## Important Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS:**
+- **Execute tests first** - Understand what's failing before fixing
+- **Diagnose thoroughly** - Find root cause, not just symptoms
+- **Fix minimally** - Change only what's needed to pass tests
+- **Verify completely** - Run full suite after each fix
+- **Document fixes** - Explain what was changed and why
+- **Certify approval** - When tests pass, code is approved
+
+**NEVER:**
+- Skip test execution - always run tests first
+- Make changes without understanding the failure
+- Fix symptoms without addressing root cause
+- Break existing passing tests
+- Skip final verification
+- Leave tests failing - must achieve 100% pass rate
+
+## Quality Certification
+
+**Your ultimate responsibility**: Ensure all tests pass. When they do, the code is automatically approved and ready for production. You are the final quality gate.
+
+**Tests passing = Code approved = Mission complete** ✅

.claude/agents/ui-design-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,547 @@
+---
+name: ui-design-agent
+description: |
+  Specialized agent for UI design token management and prototype generation with MCP-enhanced research capabilities.
+
+  Core capabilities:
+  - Design token synthesis and validation (W3C format, WCAG AA compliance)
+  - Layout strategy generation informed by modern UI trends
+  - Token-driven prototype generation with semantic markup
+  - Design system documentation and quality assurance
+  - Cross-platform responsive design (mobile, tablet, desktop)
+
+  Integration points:
+  - Exa MCP: Design trend research, modern UI patterns, implementation best practices
+  - Code Index MCP: Codebase pattern discovery, existing implementation analysis
+
+color: orange
+---
+
+You are a specialized **UI Design Agent** that executes design generation tasks autonomously. You are invoked by orchestrator commands (e.g., `consolidate.md`, `generate.md`) to produce production-ready design systems and prototypes.
+
+## Core Capabilities
+
+### 1. Design Token Synthesis
+
+**Invoked by**: `consolidate.md`
+**Input**: Style variants with proposed_tokens from extraction phase
+**Task**: Generate production-ready design token systems
+
+**Deliverables**:
+- `design-tokens.json`: W3C-compliant token definitions using OKLCH colors
+- `style-guide.md`: Comprehensive design system documentation
+- `layout-strategies.json`: MCP-researched layout variant definitions
+- `tokens.css`: CSS custom properties with Google Fonts imports
+
+**Quality Standards**:
+- WCAG AA contrast compliance (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+- Complete token coverage (colors, typography, spacing, radius, shadows, breakpoints)
+- Semantic naming conventions
+- OKLCH color format for all color values
+
+### 2. Layout Strategy Generation
+
+**Invoked by**: `consolidate.md` Phase 2.5
+**Input**: Project context from synthesis-specification.md
+**Task**: Research and generate adaptive layout strategies
+
+**Process**:
+- Query Exa MCP for modern UI layout trends (2024-2025)
+- Extract project type and tech stack context
+- Generate 3-5 layout strategies with semantic names
+- Document rationale and application guidelines
+
+**Output**: layout-strategies.json with strategy definitions
+
+### 3. UI Prototype Generation
+
+**Invoked by**: `generate.md` Phase 2a
+**Input**: Design tokens, layout strategies, target specifications
+**Task**: Generate style-agnostic HTML/CSS templates
+
+**Process**:
+- Research implementation patterns via Exa MCP (components, responsive design, accessibility, HTML semantics, CSS architecture)
+- Extract exact token variable names from design-tokens.json
+- Generate semantic HTML5 structure with ARIA attributes
+- Create structural CSS using 100% CSS custom properties
+- Implement mobile-first responsive design
+
+**Deliverables**:
+- `{target}-layout-{id}.html`: Style-agnostic HTML structure
+- `{target}-layout-{id}.css`: Token-driven structural CSS
+
+**Quality Standards**:
+- 🎯 **ADAPTIVE**: Multi-device responsive (375px+, 768px+, 1024px+)
+- 🔄 **STYLE-SWITCHABLE**: Runtime theme switching via token swapping
+- 🏗️ **SEMANTIC**: HTML5 structure with proper element hierarchy
+- ♿ **ACCESSIBLE**: ARIA attributes for WCAG AA compliance
+- 📱 **MOBILE-FIRST**: Progressive enhancement approach
+- 🎨 **TOKEN-DRIVEN**: Zero hardcoded values
+
+### 4. Consistency Validation
+
+**Invoked by**: `generate.md` Phase 3.5
+**Input**: Multiple target prototypes for same style/layout combination
+**Task**: Validate cross-target design consistency
+
+**Deliverables**:
+- Consistency reports identifying shared component variations
+- Token usage verification
+- Accessibility compliance checks
+- Layout strategy adherence validation
+
+## Design Standards
+
+### Token-Driven Design
+
+**Philosophy**:
+- All visual properties use CSS custom properties (`var()`)
+- No hardcoded values in production code
+- Runtime style switching via token file swapping
+- Theme-agnostic template architecture
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Extract exact token names from design-tokens.json
+- Validate all `var()` references against known tokens
+- Use literal CSS values only when tokens unavailable (e.g., transitions)
+- Enforce strict token naming conventions
+
+### Color System (OKLCH Mandatory)
+
+**Format**: `oklch(L C H / A)`
+- **Lightness (L)**: 0-1 scale (0 = black, 1 = white)
+- **Chroma (C)**: 0-0.4 typical range (color intensity)
+- **Hue (H)**: 0-360 degrees (color angle)
+- **Alpha (A)**: 0-1 scale (opacity)
+
+**Why OKLCH**:
+- Perceptually uniform color space
+- Predictable contrast ratios for accessibility
+- Better interpolation for gradients and animations
+- Consistent lightness across different hues
+
+**Required Token Categories**:
+- Base: `--background`, `--foreground`, `--card`, `--card-foreground`
+- Brand: `--primary`, `--primary-foreground`, `--secondary`, `--secondary-foreground`
+- UI States: `--muted`, `--muted-foreground`, `--accent`, `--accent-foreground`, `--destructive`, `--destructive-foreground`
+- Elements: `--border`, `--input`, `--ring`
+- Charts: `--chart-1` through `--chart-5`
+- Sidebar: `--sidebar`, `--sidebar-foreground`, `--sidebar-primary`, `--sidebar-primary-foreground`, `--sidebar-accent`, `--sidebar-accent-foreground`, `--sidebar-border`, `--sidebar-ring`
+
+**Guidelines**:
+- Avoid generic blue/indigo unless explicitly required
+- Test contrast ratios for all foreground/background pairs (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+- Provide light and dark mode variants when applicable
+
+### Typography System
+
+**Google Fonts Integration** (Mandatory):
+- Always use Google Fonts with proper fallback stacks
+- Include font weights in @import (e.g., 400;500;600;700)
+
+**Default Font Options**:
+- **Monospace**: 'JetBrains Mono', 'Fira Code', 'Source Code Pro', 'IBM Plex Mono', 'Roboto Mono', 'Space Mono', 'Geist Mono'
+- **Sans-serif**: 'Inter', 'Roboto', 'Open Sans', 'Poppins', 'Montserrat', 'Outfit', 'Plus Jakarta Sans', 'DM Sans', 'Geist'
+- **Serif**: 'Merriweather', 'Playfair Display', 'Lora', 'Source Serif Pro', 'Libre Baskerville'
+- **Display**: 'Space Grotesk', 'Oxanium', 'Architects Daughter'
+
+**Required Tokens**:
+- `--font-sans`: Primary body font with fallbacks
+- `--font-serif`: Serif font for headings/emphasis
+- `--font-mono`: Monospace for code/technical content
+
+**Import Pattern**:
+```css
+@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@400;500;600;700&display=swap');
+```
+
+### Visual Effects System
+
+**Shadow Tokens** (7-tier system):
+- `--shadow-2xs`: Minimal elevation
+- `--shadow-xs`: Very low elevation
+- `--shadow-sm`: Low elevation (buttons, inputs)
+- `--shadow`: Default elevation (cards)
+- `--shadow-md`: Medium elevation (dropdowns)
+- `--shadow-lg`: High elevation (modals)
+- `--shadow-xl`: Very high elevation
+- `--shadow-2xl`: Maximum elevation (overlays)
+
+**Shadow Styles**:
+```css
+/* Modern style (soft, 0 offset with blur) */
+--shadow-sm: 0 1px 3px 0px hsl(0 0% 0% / 0.10), 0 1px 2px -1px hsl(0 0% 0% / 0.10);
+
+/* Neo-brutalism style (hard, flat with offset) */
+--shadow-sm: 4px 4px 0px 0px hsl(0 0% 0% / 1.00), 4px 1px 2px -1px hsl(0 0% 0% / 1.00);
+```
+
+**Border Radius System**:
+- `--radius`: Base value (0px for brutalism, 0.625rem for modern)
+- `--radius-sm`: calc(var(--radius) - 4px)
+- `--radius-md`: calc(var(--radius) - 2px)
+- `--radius-lg`: var(--radius)
+- `--radius-xl`: calc(var(--radius) + 4px)
+
+**Spacing System**:
+- `--spacing`: Base unit (typically 0.25rem / 4px)
+- Use systematic scale with multiples of base unit
+
+### Accessibility Standards
+
+**WCAG AA Compliance** (Mandatory):
+- Text contrast: minimum 4.5:1 (7:1 for AAA)
+- UI component contrast: minimum 3:1
+- Color alone not used to convey information
+- Focus indicators visible and distinct
+
+**Semantic Markup**:
+- Proper heading hierarchy (h1 unique per page, logical h2-h6)
+- Landmark roles (banner, navigation, main, complementary, contentinfo)
+- ARIA attributes (labels, roles, states, describedby)
+- Keyboard navigation support
+
+### Responsive Design
+
+**Mobile-First Strategy** (Mandatory):
+- Base styles for mobile (375px+)
+- Progressive enhancement for larger screens
+- Fluid typography and spacing
+- Touch-friendly interactive targets (44x44px minimum)
+
+**Breakpoint Strategy**:
+- Use token-based breakpoints (`--breakpoint-sm`, `--breakpoint-md`, `--breakpoint-lg`)
+- Test at minimum: 375px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px
+- Use relative units (rem, em, %, vw/vh) over fixed pixels
+- Support container queries where appropriate
+
+## Agent Operation
+
+### Invocation Model
+
+You are invoked by orchestrator commands to execute specific generation tasks:
+
+**Token Generation** (by `consolidate.md`):
+- Synthesize design tokens from style variants
+- Generate layout strategies based on MCP research
+- Produce design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, layout-strategies.json
+
+**Prototype Generation** (by `generate.md`):
+- Generate style-agnostic HTML/CSS templates
+- Create token-driven prototypes using template instantiation
+- Produce responsive, accessible HTML/CSS files
+
+**Consistency Validation** (by `generate.md` Phase 3.5):
+- Validate cross-target design consistency
+- Generate consistency reports for multi-page workflows
+
+### Execution Principles
+
+**Autonomous Operation**:
+- Receive all parameters from orchestrator command
+- Execute task without user interaction
+- Return results through file system outputs
+
+**Target Independence** (CRITICAL):
+- Each invocation processes EXACTLY ONE target (page or component)
+- Do NOT combine multiple targets into a single template
+- Even if targets will coexist in final application, generate them independently
+- **Example Scenario**:
+  - Task: Generate template for "login" (workflow has: ["login", "sidebar"])
+  - ❌ WRONG: Generate login page WITH sidebar included
+  - ✅ CORRECT: Generate login page WITHOUT sidebar (sidebar is separate target)
+- **Verification Before Output**:
+  - Confirm template includes ONLY the specified target
+  - Check no cross-contamination from other targets in workflow
+  - Each target must be standalone and reusable
+
+**Quality-First**:
+- Apply all design standards automatically
+- Validate outputs against quality gates before completion
+- Document any deviations or warnings in output files
+
+**Research-Informed**:
+- Use MCP tools for trend research and pattern discovery
+- Integrate modern best practices into generation decisions
+- Cache research results for session reuse
+
+**Complete Outputs**:
+- Generate all required files and documentation
+- Include metadata and implementation notes
+- Validate file format and completeness
+
+### Performance Optimization
+
+**Two-Layer Generation**:
+- **Layer 1**: Generate style-agnostic templates (creative, expensive)
+- **Layer 2**: Instantiate style-specific prototypes (fast file operations)
+- **Performance gain**: S× faster (S = style variant count)
+
+**Script Integration**:
+- `convert_tokens_to_css.sh`: Token JSON → CSS conversion (~200ms)
+- `ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh`: Template instantiation (~5-10s for full matrix)
+- Auto-detection of configuration from directory structure
+
+### Scope & Boundaries
+
+**Your Responsibilities**:
+- Execute assigned generation task completely
+- Apply all quality standards automatically
+- Research when parameters require trend-informed decisions
+- Validate outputs against quality gates
+- Generate complete documentation
+
+**NOT Your Responsibilities**:
+- User interaction or confirmation
+- Workflow orchestration or sequencing
+- Parameter collection or validation
+- Strategic design decisions (provided by brainstorming phase)
+- Task scheduling or dependency management
+
+## Technical Integration
+
+### MCP Integration
+
+**Exa MCP: Design Research & Trends**
+
+*Use Cases*:
+1. **Layout Trend Research**
+   - Query: "modern web UI layout patterns design systems {project_type} 2024 2025"
+   - Purpose: Inform layout strategy generation with current trends
+
+2. **Implementation Pattern Research**
+   - Multi-dimensional queries: component patterns, responsive design, accessibility (WCAG 2.2), HTML semantics, CSS architecture
+   - Purpose: Inform template generation with modern best practices
+
+*Best Practices*:
+- Use `tokensNum="dynamic"` for token efficiency
+- Include 2024-2025 in search terms for current trends
+- Extract context (tech stack, project type) before querying
+
+*Tool Usage*:
+```javascript
+// Generic pattern
+research_results = mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+  query="specific topic + context + year range",
+  tokensNum="dynamic"
+)
+
+// Web search for trends
+trend_results = mcp__exa__web_search_exa(
+  query="UI design trends {domain} 2024",
+  numResults=5
+)
+```
+
+**Code Index MCP: Pattern Discovery**
+
+*Use Cases*:
+1. **Existing Pattern Analysis**
+   - Search existing component implementations
+   - Discover naming conventions and architectural patterns
+   - Extract reusable code structures
+
+2. **File Discovery & Verification**
+   - Find generated template files
+   - Verify output structure completeness
+   - Validate file organization
+
+*Tool Usage*:
+```javascript
+// Find patterns
+patterns = mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="component.*interface|class.*Component",
+  file_pattern="*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js}"
+)
+
+// Discover files
+templates = mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*template*.{html,css}")
+
+// Analyze structure
+summary = mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path="path/to/component.tsx")
+```
+
+### Tool Operations
+
+**File Operations**:
+- **Read**: Load design tokens, layout strategies, project artifacts
+- **Write**: Generate design-tokens.json, tokens.css, HTML/CSS prototypes, documentation
+- **Edit**: Update token definitions, refine layout strategies
+
+**Script Execution**:
+```bash
+# Token conversion
+cat design-tokens.json | ~/.claude/scripts/convert_tokens_to_css.sh > tokens.css
+
+# Prototype instantiation
+~/.claude/scripts/ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh {prototypes_dir} \
+  --session-id {id} \
+  --mode {page|component}
+```
+
+**Agent Delegation**:
+```javascript
+Task(ui-design-agent): "
+  [TASK_TYPE_IDENTIFIER]
+
+  Clear task description with context and requirements
+
+  ## Context
+  - Key parameters and input files
+  - Quality standards and constraints
+
+  ## Output Format
+  - Expected deliverables
+  - File format specifications
+"
+```
+
+## Quality Assurance
+
+### Validation Checks
+
+**Design Token Completeness**:
+- ✅ All required categories present (colors, typography, spacing, radius, shadows, breakpoints)
+- ✅ Token names follow semantic conventions
+- ✅ OKLCH color format for all color values
+- ✅ Font families include fallback stacks
+- ✅ Spacing scale is systematic and consistent
+
+**Accessibility Compliance**:
+- ✅ Color contrast ratios meet WCAG AA (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+- ✅ Heading hierarchy validation
+- ✅ Landmark role presence check
+- ✅ ARIA attribute completeness
+- ✅ Keyboard navigation support
+
+**CSS Token Usage**:
+- ✅ Extract all `var()` references from generated CSS
+- ✅ Verify all variables exist in design-tokens.json
+- ✅ Flag any hardcoded values (colors, fonts, spacing)
+- ✅ Report token usage coverage (target: 100%)
+
+### Validation Strategies
+
+**Pre-Generation**:
+- Verify all input files exist and are valid JSON
+- Check token completeness and naming conventions
+- Validate project context availability
+
+**During Generation**:
+- Monitor agent task completion
+- Validate output file creation
+- Check file content format and completeness
+
+**Post-Generation**:
+- Run CSS token usage validation
+- Test prototype rendering
+- Verify preview file generation
+- Check accessibility compliance
+
+### Error Handling & Recovery
+
+**Common Issues**:
+
+1. **Missing Google Fonts Import**
+   - Detection: Fonts not loading, browser uses fallback
+   - Recovery: Re-run convert_tokens_to_css.sh script
+   - Prevention: Script auto-generates import (version 4.2.1+)
+
+2. **CSS Variable Name Mismatches**
+   - Detection: Styles not applied, var() references fail
+   - Recovery: Extract exact names from design-tokens.json, regenerate template
+   - Prevention: Include full variable name list in generation prompts
+
+3. **Incomplete Token Coverage**
+   - Detection: Missing token categories or incomplete scales
+   - Recovery: Review source tokens, add missing values, regenerate
+   - Prevention: Validate token completeness before generation
+
+4. **WCAG Contrast Failures**
+   - Detection: Contrast ratios below WCAG AA thresholds
+   - Recovery: Adjust OKLCH lightness (L) channel, regenerate tokens
+   - Prevention: Test contrast ratios during token generation
+
+## Reference
+
+### Token System Reference
+
+**Color Tokens** (OKLCH format mandatory):
+- Base: `--background`, `--foreground`, `--card`, `--card-foreground`
+- Brand: `--primary`, `--primary-foreground`, `--secondary`, `--secondary-foreground`
+- UI States: `--muted`, `--muted-foreground`, `--accent`, `--accent-foreground`, `--destructive`, `--destructive-foreground`
+- Elements: `--border`, `--input`, `--ring`
+- Charts: `--chart-1` through `--chart-5`
+- Sidebar: `--sidebar`, `--sidebar-foreground`, `--sidebar-primary`, `--sidebar-primary-foreground`, `--sidebar-accent`, `--sidebar-accent-foreground`, `--sidebar-border`, `--sidebar-ring`
+
+**Typography Tokens**:
+- `--font-sans`: Primary body font (Google Fonts with fallbacks)
+- `--font-serif`: Serif font for headings/emphasis
+- `--font-mono`: Monospace for code/technical content
+
+**Visual Effect Tokens**:
+- Radius: `--radius` (base), `--radius-sm`, `--radius-md`, `--radius-lg`, `--radius-xl`
+- Shadows: `--shadow-2xs`, `--shadow-xs`, `--shadow-sm`, `--shadow`, `--shadow-md`, `--shadow-lg`, `--shadow-xl`, `--shadow-2xl`
+- Spacing: `--spacing` (base unit, typically 0.25rem)
+- Tracking: `--tracking-normal` (letter spacing)
+
+**CSS Generation Pattern**:
+```css
+:root {
+  /* Colors (OKLCH) */
+  --primary: oklch(0.5555 0.15 270);
+  --background: oklch(1.0000 0 0);
+
+  /* Typography */
+  --font-sans: 'Inter', system-ui, sans-serif;
+
+  /* Visual Effects */
+  --radius: 0.5rem;
+  --shadow-sm: 0 1px 3px 0 hsl(0 0% 0% / 0.1);
+  --spacing: 0.25rem;
+}
+
+/* Apply tokens globally */
+body {
+  font-family: var(--font-sans);
+  background-color: var(--background);
+  color: var(--foreground);
+}
+
+h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
+  font-family: var(--font-sans);
+}
+```
+
+### Version & Changelog
+
+**Version**: 4.2.0
+**Last Updated**: 2025-10-09
+
+**Changelog**:
+- **4.2.0** (2025-10-09): Streamlined structure and removed workflow incompatibilities
+  - **REORGANIZED**: Consolidated structure from 10 major sections to 6 logical groups
+  - **REMOVED**: Duplicate design standards (merged "Design Principles" and "Execution Guidelines > Design Standards")
+  - **REMOVED**: Duplicate tool usage sections (merged into "Technical Integration")
+  - **REMOVED**: Redundant MCP research content (consolidated into single "MCP Integration" section)
+  - **MERGED**: "Execution Context" + "Execution Guidelines" → "Agent Operation"
+  - **SIMPLIFIED**: Tool usage documentation (removed redundant "Tool Usage Protocols")
+  - **CLARIFIED**: Agent role as task executor (not workflow coordinator)
+  - **Compatibility**: 100% aligned with explore-auto.md and generate.md workflows
+  - **Size reduction**: ~40% fewer lines while retaining all key information
+
+- **4.1.0** (2025-10-09): Integrated design.mdc standards
+  - Added comprehensive OKLCH color system guidelines
+  - Documented Google Fonts integration standards
+  - Added 7-tier shadow system specification
+  - Included neo-brutalism and modern design style templates
+
+- **4.0.0** (2025-10-09): Generalized agent definition
+  - Removed task-specific implementation details
+  - Abstracted capabilities and responsibilities
+  - Enhanced MCP integration documentation
+
+- **3.0.0** (2025-10-09): Task-focused architecture
+  - Added consolidate.md and generate.md task execution
+  - Enhanced MCP integration (Exa, Code Index)
+  - Integrated convert_tokens_to_css.sh and ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh

.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+---
+name: analyze
+description: Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen)
+usage: /cli:analyze [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] <analysis-target>
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
+examples:
+  - /cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
+  - /cli:analyze --tool qwen "API security"
+  - /cli:analyze --tool codex --enhance "performance bottlenecks"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Analyze Command (/cli:analyze)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
+
+**Intent**: Understand code patterns, architecture, and provide insights/recommendations
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+
+## Core Behavior
+
+1. **Read-Only Analysis**: This command ONLY analyzes code and provides insights
+2. **No Code Modification**: Results are recommendations and analysis reports
+3. **Template-Based**: Automatically selects appropriate analysis template
+4. **Smart Pattern Detection**: Infers relevant files based on analysis target
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
+- `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` first to expand user intent
+3. Auto-detect analysis type from keywords → select template
+4. Build command with auto-detected file patterns and `MODE: analysis`
+5. Execute analysis (read-only, no code changes)
+6. Return analysis report with insights and recommendations
+
+## File Pattern Auto-Detection
+
+Keywords trigger specific file patterns:
+- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
+- "component" → `@{src/components/**/*,**/*.component.*}`
+- "API" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
+- "test" → `@{**/*.test.*,**/*.spec.*}`
+- "config" → `@{*.config.*,**/config/**/*}`
+- Generic → `@{src/**/*}`
+
+For complex patterns, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first, then execute CLI with precise file references.
+
+## Command Template
+
+```bash
+cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
+TASK: [auto-detected analysis type]
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected file patterns]
+EXPECTED: Insights, patterns, recommendations (NO code modification)
+RULES: [auto-selected template] | Focus on [analysis aspect]
+"
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Analysis**:
+```bash
+/cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
+# Executes: Gemini analysis with auth file patterns
+# Returns: Pattern analysis, architecture insights, recommendations
+```
+
+**Architecture Analysis**:
+```bash
+/cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"
+# Executes: Qwen with component file patterns
+# Returns: Architecture review, design patterns, improvement suggestions
+```
+
+**Performance Analysis**:
+```bash
+/cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks"
+# Executes: Codex deep analysis with performance focus
+# Returns: Bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations
+```
+
+**Enhanced Analysis**:
+```bash
+/cli:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues"
+# Step 1: Enhance prompt to expand context
+# Step 2: Analysis with expanded context
+# Returns: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR one-off analysis**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/analyze-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-auth-system`, analyzing auth patterns → `.chat/analyze-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, quick security check → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates, file patterns, and best practices: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Scratchpad files can be promoted to workflow sessions if analysis proves valuable

.claude/commands/cli/chat.md

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+---
+name: chat
+description: Simple CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
+usage: /cli:chat [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] "inquiry"
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
+examples:
+  - /cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
+  - /cli:chat --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
+  - /cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
+
+**Intent**: Ask questions, get explanations, understand codebase structure
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+
+## Core Behavior
+
+1. **Conversational Analysis**: Direct question-answer interaction about codebase
+2. **Read-Only**: This command ONLY provides information and analysis
+3. **No Code Modification**: Results are explanations and insights
+4. **Flexible Context**: Choose specific files or entire codebase
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--all-files` - Include entire codebase in context
+- `--save-session` - Save interaction to workflow session
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand user intent
+3. Assemble context: `@{CLAUDE.md}` + user-specified files or `--all-files`
+4. Execute CLI tool with assembled context (read-only, analysis mode)
+5. Return explanations and insights (NO code changes)
+6. Optionally save to workflow session
+
+## Context Assembly
+
+**Always included**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}` (project guidelines)
+
+**Optional**:
+- User-explicit files from inquiry keywords
+- `--all-files` flag includes entire codebase (`--all-files` wrapper parameter)
+
+For targeted analysis, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files first, then build precise CONTEXT field.
+
+## Command Template
+
+```bash
+cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+INQUIRY: [user question]
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [inferred or --all-files]
+MODE: analysis
+RESPONSE: Direct answer, explanation, insights (NO code modification)
+"
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Question**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
+# Executes: Gemini analysis
+# Returns: Explanation of auth flow, components involved, data flow
+```
+
+**Architecture Question**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --tool qwen "how does React component optimization work here"
+# Executes: Qwen architecture analysis
+# Returns: Component structure explanation, optimization patterns used
+```
+
+**Security Analysis**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
+# Executes: Codex security analysis
+# Returns: Vulnerability assessment, security recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
+```
+
+**Enhanced Inquiry**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --enhance "explain the login issue"
+# Step 1: Enhance to expand login context
+# Step 2: Analysis with expanded understanding
+# Returns: Detailed explanation of login flow and potential issues
+```
+
+**Broad Context**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --all-files "find all API endpoints"
+# Executes: Analysis across entire codebase
+# Returns: List and explanation of API endpoints (NO code generation)
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND query is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR unrelated query**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/chat-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-api-refactor`, asking about API structure → `.chat/chat-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, asking about build process → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Scratchpad conversations preserved for future reference

.claude/commands/cli/cli-init.md

@@ -0,0 +1,455 @@
+---
+name: cli-init
+description: Initialize CLI tool configurations (Gemini and Qwen) based on workspace analysis
+usage: /cli:cli-init [--tool <gemini|qwen|all>] [--output=<path>] [--preview]
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|all] [--output path] [--preview]"
+examples:
+  - /cli:cli-init
+  - /cli:cli-init --tool qwen
+  - /cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
+  - /cli:cli-init --output=.config/
+allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Initialization Command (/cli:cli-init)
+
+## Overview
+Initializes CLI tool configurations for the workspace by:
+1. Analyzing current workspace using `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to identify technology stacks
+2. Generating ignore files (`.geminiignore` and `.qwenignore`) with filtering rules optimized for detected technologies
+3. Creating configuration directories (`.gemini/` and `.qwen/`) with settings.json files
+
+**Supported Tools**: gemini, qwen, all (default: all)
+
+## Core Functionality
+
+### Configuration Generation
+1. **Workspace Analysis**: Runs `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to analyze project structure
+2. **Technology Stack Detection**: Identifies tech stacks based on file extensions, directories, and configuration files
+3. **Config Creation**: Generates tool-specific configuration directories and settings files
+4. **Ignore Rules Generation**: Creates ignore files with filtering patterns for detected technologies
+
+### Generated Files
+
+#### Configuration Directories
+Creates tool-specific configuration directories:
+
+**For Gemini** (`.gemini/`):
+- `.gemini/settings.json`:
+```json
+{
+  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+}
+```
+
+**For Qwen** (`.qwen/`):
+- `.qwen/settings.json`:
+```json
+{
+  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+}
+```
+
+#### Ignore Files
+Uses gitignore syntax to filter files from CLI tool analysis:
+- `.geminiignore` - For Gemini CLI
+- `.qwenignore` - For Qwen CLI
+
+Both files have identical content based on detected technologies.
+
+### Supported Technology Stacks
+
+#### Frontend Technologies
+- **React/Next.js**: Ignores build artifacts, .next/, node_modules
+- **Vue/Nuxt**: Ignores .nuxt/, dist/, .cache/
+- **Angular**: Ignores dist/, .angular/, node_modules
+- **Webpack/Vite**: Ignores build outputs, cache directories
+
+#### Backend Technologies
+- **Node.js**: Ignores node_modules, package-lock.json, npm-debug.log
+- **Python**: Ignores __pycache__, .venv, *.pyc, .pytest_cache
+- **Java**: Ignores target/, .gradle/, *.class, .mvn/
+- **Go**: Ignores vendor/, *.exe, go.sum (when appropriate)
+- **C#/.NET**: Ignores bin/, obj/, *.dll, *.pdb
+
+#### Database & Infrastructure
+- **Docker**: Ignores .dockerignore, docker-compose.override.yml
+- **Kubernetes**: Ignores *.secret.yaml, helm charts temp files
+- **Database**: Ignores *.db, *.sqlite, database dumps
+
+### Generated Rules Structure
+
+#### Base Rules (Always Included)
+```
+# Version Control
+.git/
+.svn/
+.hg/
+
+# OS Files
+.DS_Store
+Thumbs.db
+*.tmp
+*.swp
+
+# IDE Files
+.vscode/
+.idea/
+.vs/
+
+# Logs
+*.log
+logs/
+```
+
+#### Technology-Specific Rules
+Rules are added based on detected technologies:
+
+**Node.js Projects** (package.json detected):
+```
+# Node.js
+node_modules/
+npm-debug.log*
+.npm/
+.yarn/
+package-lock.json
+yarn.lock
+.pnpm-store/
+```
+
+**Python Projects** (requirements.txt, setup.py, pyproject.toml detected):
+```
+# Python
+__pycache__/
+*.py[cod]
+.venv/
+venv/
+.pytest_cache/
+.coverage
+htmlcov/
+```
+
+**Java Projects** (pom.xml, build.gradle detected):
+```
+# Java
+target/
+.gradle/
+*.class
+*.jar
+*.war
+.mvn/
+```
+
+## Command Options
+
+### Tool Selection
+
+**Initialize All Tools (default)**:
+```bash
+/cli:cli-init
+```
+- Creates `.gemini/`, `.qwen/` directories with settings.json
+- Creates `.geminiignore` and `.qwenignore` files
+- Sets contextfilename to "CLAUDE.md" for both
+
+**Initialize Gemini Only**:
+```bash
+/cli:cli-init --tool gemini
+```
+- Creates only `.gemini/` directory and `.geminiignore` file
+
+**Initialize Qwen Only**:
+```bash
+/cli:cli-init --tool qwen
+```
+- Creates only `.qwen/` directory and `.qwenignore` file
+
+### Preview Mode
+```bash
+/cli:cli-init --preview
+```
+- Shows what would be generated without creating files
+- Displays detected technologies, configuration, and ignore rules
+
+### Custom Output Path
+```bash
+/cli:cli-init --output=.config/
+```
+- Generates files in specified directory
+- Creates directories if they don't exist
+
+### Combined Options
+```bash
+/cli:cli-init --tool qwen --preview
+/cli:cli-init --tool all --output=.config/
+```
+
+## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS ⚡ START HERE
+
+**When this command is triggered, follow these exact steps:**
+
+### Step 1: Parse Tool Selection
+```bash
+# Extract --tool flag (default: all)
+# Options: gemini, qwen, all
+```
+
+### Step 2: Workspace Analysis (MANDATORY FIRST)
+```bash
+# Analyze workspace structure
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh json)
+```
+
+### Step 3: Technology Detection
+```bash
+# Check for common tech stack indicators
+bash(find . -name "package.json" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -1)
+bash(find . -name "requirements.txt" -o -name "setup.py" -o -name "pyproject.toml" | head -1)
+bash(find . -name "pom.xml" -o -name "build.gradle" | head -1)
+bash(find . -name "Dockerfile" | head -1)
+```
+
+### Step 4: Generate Configuration Files
+
+**For Gemini** (if --tool is gemini or all):
+```bash
+# Create .gemini/ directory and settings.json
+mkdir -p .gemini
+echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .gemini/settings.json
+
+# Create .geminiignore file with detected technology rules
+# Backup existing files if present
+```
+
+**For Qwen** (if --tool is qwen or all):
+```bash
+# Create .qwen/ directory and settings.json
+mkdir -p .qwen
+echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .qwen/settings.json
+
+# Create .qwenignore file with detected technology rules
+# Backup existing files if present
+```
+
+### Step 5: Validation
+```bash
+# Verify generated files are valid
+bash(ls -la .gemini* .qwen* 2>/dev/null || echo "Configuration files created")
+```
+
+## Implementation Process (Technical Details)
+
+### Phase 1: Tool Selection
+1. Parse `--tool` flag from command arguments
+2. Determine which configurations to generate:
+   - `gemini`: Generate .gemini/ and .geminiignore only
+   - `qwen`: Generate .qwen/ and .qwenignore only
+   - `all` (default): Generate both sets of files
+
+### Phase 2: Workspace Analysis
+1. Execute `get_modules_by_depth.sh json` to get structured project data
+2. Parse JSON output to identify directories and files
+3. Scan for technology indicators:
+   - Configuration files (package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
+   - Directory patterns (src/, tests/, etc.)
+   - File extensions (.js, .py, .java, etc.)
+4. Detect project name from directory name or package.json
+
+### Phase 3: Technology Detection
+```bash
+# Technology detection logic
+detect_nodejs() {
+    [ -f "package.json" ] || find . -name "package.json" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -1
+}
+
+detect_python() {
+    [ -f "requirements.txt" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ] || [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || \
+    find . -name "*.py" -not -path "*/__pycache__/*" | head -1
+}
+
+detect_java() {
+    [ -f "pom.xml" ] || [ -f "build.gradle" ] || \
+    find . -name "*.java" | head -1
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Configuration Generation
+**For each selected tool**, create:
+
+1. **Config Directory**:
+   - Create `.gemini/` or `.qwen/` directory if it doesn't exist
+   - Generate `settings.json` with contextfilename setting
+   - Set contextfilename to "CLAUDE.md" by default
+
+2. **Settings.json Format** (identical for both tools):
+```json
+{
+  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Ignore Rules Generation
+1. Start with base rules (always included)
+2. Add technology-specific rules based on detection
+3. Add workspace-specific patterns if found
+4. Sort and deduplicate rules
+5. Generate identical content for both `.geminiignore` and `.qwenignore`
+
+### Phase 6: File Creation
+1. **Generate config directories**: Create `.gemini/` and/or `.qwen/` directories with settings.json
+2. **Generate ignore files**: Create organized ignore files with sections
+3. **Create backups**: Backup existing files if present
+4. **Validate**: Check generated files are valid
+
+## Generated File Format
+
+### Configuration Files
+```json
+// .gemini/settings.json or .qwen/settings.json
+{
+  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+}
+```
+
+### Ignore Files
+```
+# .geminiignore / .qwenignore
+# Generated by Claude Code /cli:cli-init command
+# Creation date: 2024-01-15 10:30:00
+# Detected technologies: Node.js, Python, Docker
+#
+# This file uses gitignore syntax to filter files for CLI tool analysis
+# Edit this file to customize filtering rules for your project
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Base Rules (Always Applied)
+# ============================================================================
+
+# Version Control
+.git/
+.svn/
+.hg/
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Node.js (Detected: package.json found)
+# ============================================================================
+
+node_modules/
+npm-debug.log*
+.npm/
+yarn-error.log
+package-lock.json
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Python (Detected: requirements.txt, *.py files found)
+# ============================================================================
+
+__pycache__/
+*.py[cod]
+.venv/
+.pytest_cache/
+.coverage
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Docker (Detected: Dockerfile found)
+# ============================================================================
+
+.dockerignore
+docker-compose.override.yml
+
+# ============================================================================
+# Custom Rules (Add your project-specific rules below)
+# ============================================================================
+
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Missing Dependencies
+- If `get_modules_by_depth.sh` not found, show error with path to script
+- Gracefully handle cases where script fails
+
+### Write Permissions
+- Check write permissions before attempting file creation
+- Show clear error message if cannot write to target location
+
+### Backup Existing Files
+- If `.gemini/` directory exists, create backup as `.gemini.backup/`
+- If `.qwen/` directory exists, create backup as `.qwen.backup/`
+- If `.geminiignore` exists, create backup as `.geminiignore.backup`
+- If `.qwenignore` exists, create backup as `.qwenignore.backup`
+- Include timestamp in backup filename
+
+## Integration Points
+
+### Workflow Commands
+- **After `/cli:plan`**: Suggest running cli-init for better analysis
+- **Before analysis**: Recommend updating ignore patterns for cleaner results
+
+### CLI Tool Integration
+- Automatically update when new technologies detected
+- Integrate with `intelligent-tools-strategy.md` recommendations
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+### Basic Project Setup
+```bash
+# Initialize all CLI tools (Gemini + Qwen)
+/cli:cli-init
+
+# Initialize only Gemini
+/cli:cli-init --tool gemini
+
+# Initialize only Qwen
+/cli:cli-init --tool qwen
+
+# Preview what would be generated
+/cli:cli-init --preview
+
+# Generate in subdirectory
+/cli:cli-init --output=.config/
+```
+
+### Technology Migration
+```bash
+# After adding new tech stack (e.g., Docker)
+/cli:cli-init  # Regenerates all config and ignore files with new rules
+
+# Check what changed
+/cli:cli-init --preview  # Compare with existing configuration
+
+# Update only Qwen configuration
+/cli:cli-init --tool qwen
+```
+
+### Tool-Specific Initialization
+```bash
+# Setup for Gemini-only workflow
+/cli:cli-init --tool gemini
+
+# Setup for Qwen-only workflow
+/cli:cli-init --tool qwen
+
+# Setup both with preview
+/cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
+```
+
+## Key Benefits
+
+- **Automatic Detection**: No manual configuration needed
+- **Multi-Tool Support**: Configure Gemini and Qwen simultaneously
+- **Technology Aware**: Rules adapted to actual project stack
+- **Maintainable**: Clear sections for easy customization
+- **Consistent**: Follows gitignore syntax standards
+- **Safe**: Creates backups of existing files
+- **Flexible**: Initialize specific tools or all at once
+
+## Tool Selection Guide
+
+| Scenario | Command | Result |
+|----------|---------|--------|
+| **New project, using both tools** | `/cli:cli-init` | Creates .gemini/, .qwen/, .geminiignore, .qwenignore |
+| **Gemini-only workflow** | `/cli:cli-init --tool gemini` | Creates .gemini/ and .geminiignore only |
+| **Qwen-only workflow** | `/cli:cli-init --tool qwen` | Creates .qwen/ and .qwenignore only |
+| **Preview before commit** | `/cli:cli-init --preview` | Shows what would be generated |
+| **Update configurations** | `/cli:cli-init` | Regenerates all files with backups |

.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,513 @@
+---
+name: codex-execute
+description: Automated task decomposition and execution with Codex using resume mechanism
+usage: /cli:codex-execute [--verify-git] <task-description|task-id>
+argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
+examples:
+  - /cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
+  - /cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer"
+  - /cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Codex Execute Command (/cli:codex-execute)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Automated task decomposition and sequential execution with Codex, using `codex exec "..." resume --last` mechanism for continuity between subtasks.
+
+**Input**: User description or task ID (automatically loads from `.task/[ID].json` if applicable)
+
+## Core Workflow
+
+```
+Task Input → Analyze Dependencies → Create Task Flow Diagram →
+Decompose into Subtask Groups → TodoWrite Tracking →
+For Each Subtask Group:
+  For First Subtask in Group:
+    0. Stage existing changes (git add -A) if valid git repo
+    1. Execute with Codex (new session)
+    2. [Optional] Git verification
+    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
+  For Related Subtasks in Same Group:
+    0. Stage changes from previous subtask
+    1. Execute with `codex exec "..." resume --last` (continue session)
+    2. [Optional] Git verification
+    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
+→ Final Summary
+```
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `<input>` (Required): Task description or task ID (e.g., "implement auth" or "IMPL-001")
+  - If input matches task ID format, loads from `.task/[ID].json`
+  - Otherwise, uses input as task description
+- `--verify-git` (Optional): Verify git status after each subtask completion
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Input Processing & Task Flow Analysis
+
+1. **Parse Input**:
+   - Check if input matches task ID pattern (e.g., `IMPL-001`, `TASK-123`)
+   - If yes: Load from `.task/[ID].json` and extract requirements
+   - If no: Use input as task description directly
+
+2. **Analyze Dependencies & Create Task Flow Diagram**:
+   - Analyze task complexity and scope
+   - Identify dependencies and relationships between subtasks
+   - Create visual task flow diagram showing:
+     - Independent task groups (parallel execution possible)
+     - Sequential dependencies (must use resume)
+     - Branching logic (conditional paths)
+   - Display flow diagram for user review
+
+**Task Flow Diagram Format**:
+```
+[Group A: Auth Core]
+  A1: Create user model ──┐
+  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
+                          │
+[Group B: API Layer]      │
+  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
+  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
+
+[Group C: Testing]
+  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
+  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
+```
+
+**Diagram Symbols**:
+- `──►` Sequential dependency (must resume previous session)
+- `─┐` Branch point (multiple paths)
+- `─┘` Merge point (wait for completion)
+- `[resume]` Use `codex exec "..." resume --last`
+- `[new session]` Start fresh Codex session
+
+3. **Decompose into Subtask Groups**:
+   - Group related subtasks that share context
+   - Break down into 3-8 subtasks total
+   - Assign each subtask to a group
+   - Create TodoWrite tracker with groups
+   - Display decomposition for user review
+
+**Decomposition Criteria**:
+- Each subtask: 5-15 minutes completable
+- Clear, testable outcomes
+- Explicit dependencies
+- Focused file scope (1-5 files per subtask)
+- **Group coherence**: Subtasks in same group share context/files
+
+### File Discovery for Task Decomposition
+
+Use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files, then group by domain:
+
+**Workflow**: Discover → Analyze scope → Group by files → Create task flow
+
+**Example**:
+```bash
+# Discover files
+rg "authentication" --files-with-matches --type ts
+
+# Group by domain
+# Group A: src/auth/model.ts, src/auth/schema.ts
+# Group B: src/api/auth.ts, src/middleware/auth.ts
+# Group C: tests/auth/*.test.ts
+
+# Each group becomes a session with related subtasks
+```
+
+File patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+
+### Phase 2: Group-Based Execution
+
+**Pre-Execution Git Staging** (if valid git repository):
+```bash
+# Stage all current changes before codex execution
+# This makes codex changes clearly visible in git diff
+git add -A
+git status --short
+```
+
+**For First Subtask in Each Group** (New Session):
+```bash
+# Start new Codex session for independent task group
+codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [group goal]
+TASK: [subtask description - first in group]
+CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
+RULES: [constraints]
+Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**For Related Subtasks in Same Group** (Resume Session):
+```bash
+# Stage changes from previous subtask (if valid git repository)
+git add -A
+
+# Resume session ONLY for subtasks in same group
+codex exec "
+CONTINUE IN SAME GROUP:
+Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask N of M
+
+PURPOSE: [continuation goal within group]
+TASK: [subtask N description]
+CONTEXT: Previous work in this group completed, now focus on @{new_relevant_files}
+EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
+RULES: Build on previous subtask in group, maintain consistency
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**For First Subtask in Different Group** (New Session):
+```bash
+# Stage changes from previous group
+git add -A
+
+# Start NEW session for different group (no resume)
+codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [new group goal]
+TASK: [subtask description - first in new group]
+CONTEXT: @{different_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
+RULES: [constraints]
+Group [Y]: [new group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**Resume Decision Logic**:
+```
+if (subtask.group == previous_subtask.group):
+    use `codex exec "..." resume --last`  # Continue session
+else:
+    use `codex -C [dir] exec "..."`       # New session
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Verification (if --verify-git enabled)
+
+After each subtask completion:
+```bash
+# Check git status
+git status --short
+
+# Verify expected changes
+git diff --stat
+
+# Optional: Check for untracked files that should be committed
+git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
+```
+
+**Verification Checks**:
+- Files modified match subtask scope
+- No unexpected changes in unrelated files
+- No merge conflicts or errors
+- Code compiles/runs (if applicable)
+
+### Phase 4: TodoWrite Tracking with Groups
+
+**Initial Setup with Task Flow**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    // Display task flow diagram first
+    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
+
+    // Group A subtasks (will use resume within group)
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
+
+    // Group B subtasks (new session, then resume within group)
+    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 1" },
+    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 2" },
+
+    // Group C subtasks (new session)
+    { content: "[Group C] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group C subtask 1" },
+
+    { content: "Final verification and summary", status: "pending", activeForm: "Verifying and summarizing" }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+**After Each Subtask**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "completed", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
+    // ... update status
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+## Codex Resume Mechanism
+
+**Why Group-Based Resume?**
+- **Within Group**: Maintains conversation context for related subtasks
+  - Codex remembers previous decisions and patterns
+  - Reduces context repetition
+  - Ensures consistency in implementation style
+- **Between Groups**: Fresh session for independent tasks
+  - Avoids context pollution from unrelated work
+  - Prevents confusion when switching domains
+  - Maintains focused attention on current group
+
+**How It Works**:
+1. **First subtask in Group A**: Creates new Codex session
+2. **Subsequent subtasks in Group A**: Use `codex resume --last` to continue session
+3. **First subtask in Group B**: Creates NEW Codex session (no resume)
+4. **Subsequent subtasks in Group B**: Use `codex resume --last` within Group B
+5. Each group builds on its own context, isolated from other groups
+
+**When to Resume vs New Session**:
+```
+✅ RESUME (same group):
+  - Subtasks share files/modules
+  - Logical continuation of previous work
+  - Same architectural domain
+
+❌ NEW SESSION (different group):
+  - Independent task area
+  - Different files/modules
+  - Switching architectural domains
+  - Testing after implementation
+```
+
+**Image Support**:
+```bash
+# First subtask with design reference
+codex -C [dir] -i design.png --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+# Resume for next subtask (image context preserved)
+codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Subtask Failure**:
+1. Mark subtask as blocked in TodoWrite
+2. Report error details to user
+3. Pause execution for manual intervention
+4. User can choose to:
+   - Retry current subtask
+   - Continue to next subtask
+   - Abort entire task
+
+**Git Verification Failure** (if --verify-git):
+1. Show unexpected changes
+2. Pause execution
+3. Request user decision:
+   - Continue anyway
+   - Rollback and retry
+   - Manual fix
+
+**Codex Session Lost**:
+1. Detect if `codex exec "..." resume --last` fails
+2. Attempt retry with fresh session
+3. Report to user if manual intervention needed
+
+## Output Format
+
+**During Execution**:
+```
+📊 Task Flow Diagram:
+[Group A: Auth Core]
+  A1: Create user model ──┐
+  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
+                          │
+[Group B: API Layer]      │
+  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
+  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
+
+[Group C: Testing]
+  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
+  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
+
+📋 Task Decomposition:
+  [Group A] 1. Create user model
+  [Group A] 2. Add validation logic [resume]
+  [Group A] 3. Implement database schema [resume]
+  [Group B] 4. Create auth endpoints [new session]
+  [Group B] 5. Add middleware [resume]
+  [Group B] 6. Error handling [resume]
+  [Group C] 7. Unit tests [new session]
+  [Group C] 8. Integration tests [resume]
+
+▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
+  Starting new Codex session for Group A...
+  [Codex output]
+  ✅ Subtask 1 completed
+
+🔍 Git Verification:
+  M  src/models/user.ts
+  ✅ Changes verified
+
+▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
+  Resuming Codex session (same group)...
+  [Codex output]
+  ✅ Subtask 2 completed
+
+▶️  [Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
+  Starting NEW Codex session for Group B...
+  [Codex output]
+  ✅ Subtask 4 completed
+...
+
+✅ All Subtasks Completed
+📊 Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
+```
+
+**Final Summary**:
+```markdown
+# Task Execution Summary: [Task Description]
+
+## Subtasks Completed
+1. ✅ [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
+2. ✅ [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
+...
+
+## Files Modified
+- src/file1.ts:10-50 - [changes]
+- src/file2.ts - [changes]
+
+## Git Status
+- N files modified
+- M files added
+- No conflicts
+
+## Next Steps
+- [Suggested follow-up actions]
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Example 1: Simple Task with Groups**
+```bash
+/cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
+
+# Task Flow Diagram:
+# [Group A: Data Layer]
+#   A1: Create user model ──► [resume] ──► A2: Database schema
+#
+# [Group B: Auth Logic]
+#   B1: JWT token generation ──► [new session]
+#   B2: Authentication middleware ──► [resume]
+#
+# [Group C: API Endpoints]
+#   C1: Login/logout endpoints ──► [new session]
+#
+# [Group D: Testing]
+#   D1: Unit tests ──► [new session]
+#   D2: Integration tests ──► [resume]
+
+# Execution:
+# Group A: A1 (new) → A2 (resume)
+# Group B: B1 (new) → B2 (resume)
+# Group C: C1 (new)
+# Group D: D1 (new) → D2 (resume)
+```
+
+**Example 2: With Git Verification**
+```bash
+/cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer to use dependency injection"
+
+# After each subtask, verifies:
+# - Only expected files modified
+# - No breaking changes in unrelated code
+# - Tests still pass
+```
+
+**Example 3: With Task ID**
+```bash
+/cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
+
+# Loads task from .task/IMPL-001.json
+# Decomposes based on task requirements
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Task Flow First**: Always create visual flow diagram before execution
+2. **Group Related Work**: Cluster subtasks by domain/files for efficient resume
+3. **Subtask Granularity**: Keep subtasks small and focused (5-15 min each)
+4. **Clear Boundaries**: Each subtask should have well-defined input/output
+5. **Git Hygiene**: Use `--verify-git` for critical refactoring
+6. **Pre-Execution Staging**: Stage changes before each subtask to clearly see codex modifications
+7. **Smart Resume**: Use `resume --last` ONLY within same group
+8. **Fresh Sessions**: Start new session when switching to different group/domain
+9. **Recovery Points**: TodoWrite with group labels provides clear progress tracking
+10. **Image References**: Attach design files for UI tasks (first subtask in group)
+
+## Input Processing
+
+**Automatic Detection**:
+- Input matches task ID pattern → Load from `.task/[ID].json`
+- Otherwise → Use as task description
+
+**Task JSON Structure** (when loading from file):
+```json
+{
+  "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Implement user authentication",
+  "description": "Create JWT-based auth system",
+  "acceptance_criteria": [...],
+  "scope": {...},
+  "brainstorming_refs": [...]
+}
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Execution Log Destination**:
+- **IF** active workflow session exists:
+  - Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
+  - Task summaries: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
+  - Task updates: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.task/[TASK-ID].json` status updates
+  - TodoWrite tracking: Embedded in execution log
+- **ELSE** (no active session):
+  - **Recommended**: Create workflow session first (`/workflow:session:start`)
+  - **Alternative**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Output Files** (during execution):
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[session-id]/
+├── .chat/
+│   └── codex-execute-20250105-143022.md    # Full execution log with task flow
+├── .summaries/
+│   ├── IMPL-001.1-summary.md               # Subtask summaries
+│   ├── IMPL-001.2-summary.md
+│   └── IMPL-001-summary.md                 # Final task summary
+└── .task/
+    ├── IMPL-001.json                       # Updated task status
+    └── [subtask JSONs if decomposed]
+```
+
+**Examples**:
+- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing multi-stage auth implementation:
+  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/codex-execute-20250105-143022.md`
+  - Summaries: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001.{1,2,3}-summary.md`
+  - Task status: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.task/IMPL-001.json` (status: completed)
+- No session, ad-hoc multi-stage task:
+  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-auth-refactor-20250105-143045.md`
+
+**Save Results**:
+- Execution log with task flow diagram and TodoWrite tracking
+- Individual summaries for each completed subtask
+- Final consolidated summary when all subtasks complete
+- Modified code files throughout project
+
+## Notes
+
+**vs. `/cli:execute`**:
+- `/cli:execute`: Single-shot execution with Gemini/Qwen/Codex
+- `/cli:codex-execute`: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition and resume mechanism
+
+**Input Flexibility**: Accepts both freeform descriptions and task IDs (auto-detects and loads JSON)
+
+**Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
+
+**Output Details**:
+- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
+- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes

.claude/commands/cli/execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+---
+name: execute
+description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference
+usage: /cli:execute [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] <description|task-id>
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
+examples:
+  - /cli:execute "implement user authentication system"
+  - /cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
+  - /cli:execute --tool codex IMPL-001
+  - /cli:execute --enhance "fix API performance issues"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations). **MODIFIES CODE**.
+
+**Intent**: Autonomous code implementation, modification, and generation
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: Automatic context inference and file pattern detection
+
+## Core Behavior
+
+1. **Code Modification**: This command MODIFIES, CREATES, and DELETES code files
+2. **Auto-Approval**: YOLO mode bypasses confirmation prompts for all operations
+3. **Implementation Focus**: Executes actual code changes, not just recommendations
+4. **Requires Explicit Intent**: Use only when implementation is intended
+
+## Core Concepts
+
+### YOLO Permissions
+Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
+
+**⚠️ WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
+
+### Execution Modes
+
+**1. Description Mode** (supports `--enhance`):
+- Input: Natural language description
+- Process: [Optional: Enhance] → Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Execute
+
+**2. Task ID Mode** (no `--enhance`):
+- Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
+- Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
+
+### Context Inference
+
+Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology:
+- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
+- "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
+- "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
+- Always includes: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
+
+For precise file targeting, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first.
+
+### Codex Session Continuity
+
+**Resume Pattern** for related tasks:
+```bash
+# First task - establish session
+codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "[task]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+# Related task - continue session
+codex --full-auto exec "[related-task]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See intelligent-tools-strategy.md for auto-resume rules.
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
+- `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
+- `--debug` - Verbose logging
+- `--save-session` - Save execution to workflow session
+
+## Workflow Integration
+
+**Session Management**: Auto-detects `.workflow/.active-*` marker
+- Active session: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
+- No session: Create new session or save to scratchpad
+
+**Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Execution Log Destination**:
+- **IF** active workflow session exists:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
+  - Update task status in `.task/[TASK-ID].json` (if task ID provided)
+  - Generate summary in `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`
+- **ELSE** (no active session):
+  - **Option 1**: Create new workflow session for task
+  - **Option 2**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Output Files** (when active session exists):
+- Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
+- Task summary: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
+- Modified code: Project files per implementation
+
+**Examples**:
+- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing `IMPL-001`:
+  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/execute-20250105-143022.md`
+  - Summary: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
+- No session, ad-hoc implementation:
+  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Command Template
+
+```bash
+# Gemini/Qwen: MODE=write with --approval-mode yolo
+cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
+PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
+TASK: [specific implementation]
+MODE: write
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
+EXPECTED: Working implementation with code changes
+RULES: [constraints] | Auto-approve all changes
+"
+
+# Codex: MODE=auto with danger-full-access
+codex -C . --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
+TASK: [specific implementation]
+MODE: auto
+CONTEXT: [auto-detected files]
+EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
+# Executes: Creates auth middleware, updates routes, modifies config
+# Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
+```
+
+**Enhanced Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
+# Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
+# Step 2: Execute implementation with auto-approval
+# Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
+```
+
+**Task Execution** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute IMPL-001
+# Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
+# Executes: Implementation based on task spec
+# Result: Code changes per task definition
+```
+
+**Codex Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
+# Executes: Codex with full file access
+# Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
+```
+
+**Qwen Code Generation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
+# Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
+# Step 2: Execute with MODE=write
+# Result: REFACTORED auth code with structural changes
+```
+
+## Comparison with Analysis Commands
+
+| Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
+|---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
+| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | ❌ NO | N/A |
+| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | ❌ NO | N/A |
+| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | ✅ **YES** | ✅ **YES** |
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates, YOLO mode details, and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command modifies code - execution logs document changes made

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+---
+name: bug-index
+description: Bug analysis and fix suggestions using CLI tools
+usage: /cli:mode:bug-index [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "bug description"
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
+examples:
+  - /cli:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error"
+  - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool qwen --enhance "login not working"
+  - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "token validation fails"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Mode: Bug Index (/cli:mode:bug-index)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`).
+
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
+- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error message
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
+2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[bug-description]"` first
+3. Parse bug description (original or enhanced)
+4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
+5. Build command for selected tool with bug-fix template
+6. Execute analysis (read-only, provides fix recommendations)
+7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes bugs and suggests fixes - it does NOT modify code
+2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
+3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
+4. **Template Required**: Always use bug-fix template
+5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results and fix recommendations to session chat
+
+## Analysis Focus (via Template)
+
+- Root cause investigation and diagnosis
+- Code path tracing to locate issues
+- Targeted minimal fix recommendations
+- Impact assessment of proposed changes
+
+## Command Template
+
+```bash
+cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: [bug analysis goal]
+TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
+EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fix suggestions
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
+"
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Bug Analysis**:
+```bash
+cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Debug authentication null pointer error
+TASK: Identify root cause and provide fix recommendations
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: Root cause, code path, minimal fix suggestion, impact assessment
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: null pointer in login flow
+"
+```
+
+**Directory-Specific**:
+```bash
+cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Fix token validation failure
+TASK: Analyze token validation bug in auth module
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: Validation logic analysis, fix recommendation with minimal changes
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: token validation fails intermittently
+"
+```
+
+## Bug Investigation Workflow
+
+```bash
+# 1. Find bug-related files
+rg "error_keyword" --files-with-matches
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="error|exception", file_pattern="*.ts")
+
+# 2. Execute bug analysis with focused context (analysis only, no code changes)
+/cli:mode:bug-index --cd "src/module" "specific error description"
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND bug is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR quick debugging**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/bug-index-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-payment-fix`, analyzing payment bug → `.chat/bug-index-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, quick null pointer investigation → `.scratchpad/bug-index-null-pointer-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
+- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive codebase context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+---
+name: code-analysis
+description: Deep code analysis and debugging using CLI tools with specialized template
+usage: /cli:mode:code-analysis [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "analysis target"
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
+examples:
+  - /cli:mode:code-analysis "analyze authentication flow logic"
+  - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen --enhance "explain data transformation pipeline"
+  - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex --cd "src/core" "trace execution path for user registration"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`).
+
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
+- `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
+2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[analysis-target]"` first
+3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
+4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
+5. Build command for selected tool with code-analysis template
+6. Execute deep analysis (read-only, no code modification)
+7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes code and provides insights - it does NOT modify code
+2. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
+3. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
+4. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
+5. **Template Required**: Always use code-analysis template
+6. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
+
+## Analysis Capabilities (via Template)
+
+- **Systematic Code Analysis**: Break down complex code into manageable parts
+- **Execution Path Tracing**: Track variable states and call stacks
+- **Control & Data Flow**: Understand code logic and data transformations
+- **Call Flow Visualization**: Diagram function calling sequences
+- **Logical Reasoning**: Explain "why" behind code behavior
+- **Debugging Insights**: Identify potential bugs or inefficiencies
+
+## Command Template
+
+```bash
+cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: [analysis goal]
+TASK: Systematic code analysis and execution path tracing
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
+EXPECTED: Execution trace, call flow diagram, debugging insights
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [aspect]
+"
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Code Analysis**:
+```bash
+cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Trace authentication execution flow
+TASK: Analyze complete auth flow from request to response
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: Step-by-step execution trace with call diagram, variable states
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on control flow
+"
+```
+
+**Directory-Specific Analysis**:
+```bash
+cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Understand JWT token validation logic
+TASK: Trace JWT validation from middleware to service layer
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: Validation flow diagram, token lifecycle analysis
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on security
+"
+```
+
+## Code Tracing Workflow
+
+```bash
+# 1. Find entry points and related files
+rg "function.*authenticate|class.*AuthService" --files-with-matches
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="authenticate|login", file_pattern="*.ts")
+
+# 2. Build call graph understanding
+# entry → middleware → service → repository
+
+# 3. Execute deep analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
+/cli:mode:code-analysis --cd "src" "trace execution from entry point"
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR standalone analysis**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/code-analysis-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-auth-refactor`, analyzing auth flow → `.chat/code-analysis-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, tracing request lifecycle → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-request-flow-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`
+- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive code context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+---
+name: plan
+description: Project planning and architecture analysis using CLI tools
+usage: /cli:mode:plan [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "topic"
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
+examples:
+  - /cli:mode:plan "design user dashboard"
+  - /cli:mode:plan --tool qwen --enhance "plan microservices migration"
+  - /cli:mode:plan --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "authentication system"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`).
+
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped planning
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance topic with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
+- `<topic>` (Required) - Planning topic or architectural question
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
+2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[topic]"` first
+3. Parse topic (original or enhanced)
+4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
+5. Build command for selected tool with planning template
+6. Execute analysis (read-only, no code modification)
+7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Analysis Only**: This command provides planning recommendations and insights - it does NOT modify code
+2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before planning
+3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
+4. **Template Required**: Always use planning template
+5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
+
+## Planning Capabilities (via Template)
+
+- Strategic architecture insights and recommendations
+- Implementation roadmaps and suggestions
+- Key technical decisions analysis
+- Risk assessment
+- Resource planning
+
+## Command Template
+
+```bash
+cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: [planning goal from topic]
+TASK: Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
+EXPECTED: Strategic insights, implementation recommendations, key decisions
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on [topic area]
+"
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Planning Analysis**:
+```bash
+cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Design user dashboard architecture
+TASK: Plan dashboard component structure and data flow
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: Architecture recommendations, component design, data flow diagram
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on scalability
+"
+```
+
+**Directory-Specific Planning**:
+```bash
+cd src/api && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Plan API refactoring strategy
+TASK: Analyze current API structure and recommend improvements
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: Refactoring roadmap, breaking change analysis, migration plan
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Maintain backward compatibility
+"
+```
+
+## Planning Workflow
+
+```bash
+# 1. Discover project structure
+~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
+
+# 2. Gather existing architecture info
+rg "architecture|design" --files-with-matches
+
+# 3. Execute planning analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
+/cli:mode:plan "topic for strategic planning"
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND planning is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR exploratory planning**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/plan-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-dashboard`, planning dashboard architecture → `.chat/plan-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, exploring new feature idea → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`
+- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive project context

.claude/commands/codex/analyze.md

@@ -1,155 +0,0 @@
----
-name: analyze
-description: Quick analysis of codebase patterns, architecture, and code quality using Codex CLI
-usage: /codex:analyze <analysis-type>
-argument-hint: "analysis target or type"
-examples:
-  - /codex:analyze "React hooks patterns"
-  - /codex:analyze "authentication security"
-  - /codex:analyze "performance bottlenecks"
-  - /codex:analyze "API design patterns"
-model: haiku
----
-
-# Codex Analysis Command (/codex:analyze)
-
-## Overview
-Quick analysis tool for codebase insights using intelligent pattern detection and template-driven analysis with Codex CLI.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md
-
-⚠️ **Critical Difference**: Codex has **NO `--all-files` flag** - you MUST use `@` patterns to reference files.
-
-## Analysis Types
-
-| Type | Purpose | Example |
-|------|---------|---------|
-| **pattern** | Code pattern detection | "React hooks usage patterns" |
-| **architecture** | System structure analysis | "component hierarchy structure" |
-| **security** | Security vulnerabilities | "authentication vulnerabilities" |
-| **performance** | Performance bottlenecks | "rendering performance issues" |
-| **quality** | Code quality assessment | "testing coverage analysis" |
-| **dependencies** | Third-party analysis | "outdated package dependencies" |
-
-## Quick Usage
-
-### Basic Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "authentication patterns"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*auth*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt)" -s danger-full-access`
-
-### Targeted Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "React component architecture"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{src/components/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt)" -s danger-full-access`
-
-### Security Focus
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "API security vulnerabilities"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{**/api/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/security.txt)" -s danger-full-access`
-
-## Codex-Specific Patterns
-
-**Essential File Patterns** (Required for Codex):
-```bash
-@{**/*}                    # All files recursively
-@{src/**/*}               # All source files
-@{*.ts,*.js}              # Specific file types
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} # Documentation hierarchy
-@{package.json,*.config.*} # Configuration files
-```
-
-## Templates Used
-
-Templates are automatically selected based on analysis type:
-- **Pattern Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt`
-- **Architecture Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt`
-- **Security Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/security.txt`
-- **Performance Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/performance.txt`
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-⚠️ **Session Check**: Automatically detects active workflow session via `.workflow/.active-*` marker file.
-
-**Analysis results saved to:**
-- Active session: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/analysis-[timestamp].md`
-- No session: Temporary analysis output
-
-## Common Patterns
-
-### Technology Stack Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "project technology stack"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{package.json,*.config.*,CLAUDE.md} [analysis prompt]" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### Code Quality Review
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "code quality and standards"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{src/**/*,test/**/*,CLAUDE.md} [analysis prompt]" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### Migration Planning
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "legacy code modernization"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx},CLAUDE.md} [analysis prompt]" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### Module-Specific Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:analyze "authentication module patterns"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{src/auth/**/*,**/*auth*,CLAUDE.md} [analysis prompt]" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Output Format
-
-Analysis results include:
-- **File References**: Specific file:line locations
-- **Code Examples**: Relevant code snippets
-- **Patterns Found**: Common patterns and anti-patterns
-- **Recommendations**: Actionable improvements
-- **Integration Points**: How components connect
-
-## Execution Templates
-
-### Basic Analysis Template
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "@{inferred_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Analysis Type: [analysis_type]
-
-Provide:
-- Pattern identification and analysis
-- Code quality assessment
-- Architecture insights
-- Specific recommendations with file:line references" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### Template-Enhanced Analysis
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "@{inferred_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/[template].txt)
-
-Focus: [analysis_type]
-Context: [user_description]" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Error Prevention
-
-- **Always include @ patterns**: Commands without file references will fail
-- **Test patterns first**: Validate @ patterns match existing files
-- **Use comprehensive patterns**: `@{**/*}` when unsure of file structure
-- **Include documentation**: Always add `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}` for context
-
-## Codex vs Gemini
-
-| Feature | Codex | Gemini |
-|---------|-------|--------|
-| File Loading | `@` patterns **required** | `--all-files` available |
-| Command Structure | `codex exec "@{patterns}"` | `gemini --all-files -p` |
-| Pattern Flexibility | Must be explicit | Auto-includes with flag |
-
-For detailed syntax, patterns, and advanced usage see:
-**@~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md**

.claude/commands/codex/chat.md

@@ -1,189 +0,0 @@
----
-name: chat
-
-description: Simple Codex CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis and development
-usage: /codex:chat "inquiry"
-argument-hint: "your question or development request"
-examples:
-  - /codex:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-  - /codex:chat "how can I optimize this React component performance?"
-  - /codex:chat "implement user profile editing functionality"
-allowed-tools: Bash(codex:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/codex:chat`**
-
--   **Type**: Basic Codex CLI Wrapper
--   **Purpose**: Direct interaction with the `codex` CLI for simple codebase analysis and development
--   **Core Tool**: `Bash(codex:*)` - Executes the external Codex CLI tool
-
-⚠️ **Critical Difference**: Codex has **NO `--all-files` flag** - you MUST use `@` patterns to reference files.
-
-### 📥 **Parameters & Usage**
-
--   **`<inquiry>` (Required)**: Your question or development request
--   **`@{patterns}` (Required)**: File patterns must be explicitly specified
--   **`--save-session` (Optional)**: Saves the interaction to current workflow session directory
--   **`--full-auto` (Optional)**: Enable autonomous development mode
-
-### 🔄 **Execution Workflow**
-
-`Parse Input` **->** `Infer File Patterns` **->** `Construct Prompt` **->** `Execute Codex CLI` **->** `(Optional) Save Session`
-
-### 📚 **Context Assembly**
-
-Context is gathered from:
-1. **Project Guidelines**: Always includes `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-2. **Inferred Patterns**: Auto-detects relevant files based on inquiry keywords
-3. **Comprehensive Fallback**: Uses `@{**/*}` when pattern inference unclear
-
-### 📝 **Prompt Format**
-
-```
-=== CONTEXT ===
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [Project guidelines]
-@{inferred_patterns} [Auto-detected or comprehensive patterns]
-
-=== USER INPUT ===
-[The user inquiry text]
-```
-
-### ⚙️ **Execution Implementation**
-
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION execute_codex_chat(user_inquiry, flags):
-  // Always include project guidelines
-  patterns = "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}"
-  
-  // Infer relevant file patterns from inquiry keywords
-  inferred_patterns = infer_file_patterns(user_inquiry)
-  IF inferred_patterns:
-    patterns += "," + inferred_patterns
-  ELSE:
-    patterns += ",@{**/*}"  // Fallback to all files
-  
-  // Construct prompt
-  prompt = "=== CONTEXT ===\n" + patterns + "\n"
-  prompt += "\n=== USER INPUT ===\n" + user_inquiry
-  
-  // Execute codex CLI
-  IF flags contain "--full-auto":
-    result = execute_tool("Bash(codex:*)", "--full-auto", prompt)
-  ELSE:
-    result = execute_tool("Bash(codex:*)", "exec", prompt)
-  
-  // Save session if requested
-  IF flags contain "--save-session":
-    save_chat_session(user_inquiry, patterns, result)
-  
-  RETURN result
-END FUNCTION
-```
-
-### 🎯 **Pattern Inference Logic**
-
-**Auto-detects file patterns based on keywords:**
-
-| Keywords | Inferred Pattern | Purpose |
-|----------|-----------------|---------|
-| "auth", "login", "user" | `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}` | Authentication code |
-| "React", "component" | `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}` | React components |
-| "API", "endpoint", "route" | `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}` | API code |
-| "test", "spec" | `@{test/**/*,**/*.test.*,**/*.spec.*}` | Test files |
-| "config", "setup" | `@{*.config.*,package.json}` | Configuration |
-| "database", "db", "model" | `@{**/models/**/*,**/db/**/*}` | Database code |
-| "style", "css" | `@{**/*.{css,scss,sass}}` | Styling files |
-
-**Fallback**: If no keywords match, uses `@{**/*}` for comprehensive analysis.
-
-### 💾 **Session Persistence**
-
-When `--save-session` flag is used:
--   Check for existing active session (`.workflow/.active-*` markers)
--   Save to existing session's `.chat/` directory or create new session
--   File format: `chat-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.md`
--   Include query, context patterns, and response in saved file
-
-**Session Template:**
-```markdown
-# Chat Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Query
-[Original user inquiry]
-
-## Context Patterns
-[File patterns used in analysis]
-
-## Codex Response
-[Complete response from Codex CLI]
-
-## Pattern Inference
-[How file patterns were determined]
-```
-
-### 🔧 **Usage Examples**
-
-#### Basic Development Chat
-```bash
-/codex:chat "implement password reset functionality"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,**/*auth*,**/*user*} implement password reset functionality" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-#### Architecture Discussion
-```bash
-/codex:chat "how should I structure the user management module?"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,**/*user*,src/**/*} how should I structure the user management module?" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-#### Performance Optimization
-```bash
-/codex:chat "optimize React component rendering performance"
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}} optimize React component rendering performance" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-#### Full Auto Mode
-```bash
-/codex:chat "create a complete user dashboard with charts" --full-auto
-# Executes: codex --full-auto exec "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,**/*user*,**/*dashboard*} create a complete user dashboard with charts" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### ⚠️ **Error Prevention**
-
--   **Pattern validation**: Ensures @ patterns match existing files
--   **Fallback patterns**: Uses comprehensive `@{**/*}` when inference fails
--   **Context verification**: Always includes project guidelines
--   **Session handling**: Graceful handling of missing workflow directories
-
-### 📊 **Codex vs Gemini Chat**
-
-| Feature | Codex Chat | Gemini Chat |
-|---------|------------|-------------|
-| File Loading | `@` patterns **required** | `--all-files` available |
-| Pattern Inference | Automatic keyword-based | Manual or --all-files |
-| Development Focus | Code generation & implementation | Analysis & exploration |
-| Automation | `--full-auto` mode available | Interactive only |
-| Command Structure | `codex exec "@{patterns}"` | `gemini --all-files -p` |
-
-### 🚀 **Advanced Features**
-
-#### Multi-Pattern Inference
-```bash
-/codex:chat "implement React authentication with API integration"
-# Infers: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,src/**/*.{jsx,tsx},**/*auth*,**/api/**/*}
-```
-
-#### Context-Aware Development
-```bash
-/codex:chat "add unit tests for the payment processing module"
-# Infers: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,**/*payment*,test/**/*,**/*.test.*}
-```
-
-#### Configuration Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:chat "review and optimize build configuration"
-# Infers: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md,*.config.*,package.json,webpack.*,vite.*}
-```
-
-For detailed syntax, patterns, and advanced usage see:
-**@~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md**

.claude/commands/codex/execute.md

@@ -1,223 +0,0 @@
----
-name: execute
-description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference using Codex CLI
-usage: /codex:execute <description|task-id>
-argument-hint: "implementation description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /codex:execute "implement user authentication system" 
-  - /codex:execute "optimize React component performance"
-  - /codex:execute IMPL-001 
-  - /codex:execute "fix API performance issues"
-allowed-tools: Bash(codex:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Codex Execute Command (/codex:execute)
-
-## Overview
-
-**⚡ YOLO-enabled execution**: Auto-approves all confirmations for streamlined implementation workflow.
-
-**Purpose**: Execute implementation tasks using intelligent context inference and Codex CLI with full permissions.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md
-
-⚠️ **Critical Difference**: Codex has **NO `--all-files` flag** - you MUST use `@` patterns to reference files.
-
-## 🚨 YOLO Permissions
-
-**All confirmations auto-approved by default:**
-- ✅ File pattern inference confirmation
-- ✅ Codex execution confirmation  
-- ✅ File modification confirmation
-- ✅ Implementation summary generation
-
-## Execution Modes
-
-### 1. Description Mode
-**Input**: Natural language description
-```bash
-/codex:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-```
-**Process**: Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Context collection → Execution
-
-### 2. Task ID Mode  
-**Input**: Workflow task identifier
-```bash
-/codex:execute IMPL-001
-```
-**Process**: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Context integration → Execution
-
-### 3. Full Auto Mode
-**Input**: Complex development tasks
-```bash
-/codex:execute "create complete todo application with React and TypeScript"
-```
-**Process**: Uses `codex --full-auto ... -s danger-full-access` for autonomous implementation
-
-## Context Inference Logic
-
-**Auto-selects relevant files based on:**
-- **Keywords**: "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- **Technology**: "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
-- **Task Type**: "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- **Always includes**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-
-## Essential Codex Patterns
-
-**Required File Patterns** (No --all-files available):
-```bash
-@{**/*}                    # All files recursively (equivalent to --all-files)
-@{src/**/*}               # All source files
-@{*.ts,*.js}              # Specific file types
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} # Documentation hierarchy
-@{package.json,*.config.*} # Configuration files
-```
-
-## Command Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--debug` | Verbose execution logging |
-| `--save-session` | Save complete execution session to workflow |
-| `--full-auto` | Enable autonomous development mode |
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-### Session Management
-⚠️ **Auto-detects active session**: Checks `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
-
-**Session storage:**
-- **Active session exists**: Saves to `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session**: Creates new session directory
-
-### Task Integration
-```bash
-# Execute specific workflow task
-/codex:execute IMPL-001
-
-# Loads from: .task/impl-001.json
-# Uses: task context, brainstorming refs, scope definitions
-# Updates: workflow status, generates summary
-```
-
-## Execution Templates
-
-### User Description Template
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "@{inferred_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Implementation Task: [user_description]
-
-Provide:
-- Specific implementation code
-- File modification locations (file:line)
-- Test cases
-- Integration guidance" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### Task ID Template
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "@{task_files} @{brainstorming_refs} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Task: [task_title] (ID: [task-id])
-Type: [task_type]
-Scope: [task_scope]
-
-Execute implementation following task acceptance criteria." -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-### Full Auto Template
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Development Task: [user_description]
-
-Autonomous implementation with:
-- Architecture decisions
-- Code generation
-- Testing
-- Documentation" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Auto-Generated Outputs
-
-### 1. Implementation Summary
-**Location**: `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` or auto-generated ID
-
-```markdown
-# Task Summary: [Task-ID] [Description]
-
-## Implementation
-- **Files Modified**: [file:line references]
-- **Features Added**: [specific functionality]
-- **Context Used**: [inferred patterns]
-
-## Integration
-- [Links to workflow documents]
-```
-
-### 2. Execution Session
-**Location**: `.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-
-```markdown
-# Execution Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Input
-[User description or Task ID]
-
-## Context Inference
-[File patterns used with rationale]
-
-## Implementation Results
-[Generated code and modifications]
-
-## Status Updates
-[Workflow integration updates]
-```
-
-## Development Templates Used
-
-Based on task type, automatically selects:
-- **Feature Development**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt`
-- **Component Creation**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/component.txt`
-- **Code Refactoring**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/refactor.txt`
-- **Bug Fixing**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt`
-- **Test Generation**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/testing.txt`
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Task ID not found**: Lists available tasks
-- **Pattern inference failure**: Uses generic `@{src/**/*}` pattern
-- **Execution failure**: Attempts fallback with simplified context
-- **File modification errors**: Reports specific file/permission issues
-- **Missing @ patterns**: Auto-adds `@{**/*}` for comprehensive context
-
-## Performance Features
-
-- **Smart caching**: Frequently used pattern mappings
-- **Progressive inference**: Precise → broad pattern fallback
-- **Parallel execution**: When multiple contexts needed
-- **Directory optimization**: Uses `--cd` flag when beneficial
-
-## Integration Workflow
-
-**Typical sequence:**
-1. `workflow:plan` → Creates tasks
-2. `/codex:execute IMPL-001` → Executes with YOLO permissions
-3. Auto-updates workflow status and generates summaries
-4. `workflow:review` → Final validation
-
-**vs. `/codex:analyze`**: Execute performs analysis **and implementation**, analyze is read-only.
-
-## Codex vs Gemini Execution
-
-| Feature | Codex | Gemini |
-|---------|-------|--------|
-| File Loading | `@` patterns **required** | `--all-files` available |
-| Automation Level | Full autonomous with `--full-auto` | Manual implementation |
-| Command Structure | `codex exec "@{patterns}"` | `gemini --all-files -p` |
-| Development Focus | Code generation & implementation | Analysis & planning |
-
-For detailed patterns, syntax, and templates see:
-**@~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md**

.claude/commands/codex/mode/auto.md

@@ -1,285 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto
-description: Full autonomous development mode with intelligent template selection and execution
-usage: /codex:mode:auto "description of development task"
-argument-hint: "description of what you want to develop or implement"
-examples:
-  - /codex:mode:auto "create user authentication system with JWT"
-  - /codex:mode:auto "build real-time chat application with React"
-  - /codex:mode:auto "implement payment processing with Stripe integration"
-  - /codex:mode:auto "develop REST API with user management features"
-allowed-tools: Bash(ls:*), Bash(codex:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Full Auto Development Mode (/codex:mode:auto)
-
-## Overview
-Leverages Codex's `--full-auto` mode for autonomous development with intelligent template selection and comprehensive context gathering.
-
-**Process**: Analyze Input → Select Templates → Gather Context → Execute Autonomous Development
-
-⚠️ **Critical Feature**: Uses `codex --full-auto ... -s danger-full-access` for maximum autonomous capability with mandatory `@` pattern requirements.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Autonomous Development Examples
-```bash
-# Complete application development
-/codex:mode:auto "create todo application with React and TypeScript"
-
-# Feature implementation
-/codex:mode:auto "implement user authentication with JWT and refresh tokens"
-
-# System integration
-/codex:mode:auto "add payment processing with Stripe to existing e-commerce system"
-
-# Architecture implementation
-/codex:mode:auto "build microservices API with user management and notification system"
-```
-
-## Template Selection Logic
-
-### Dynamic Template Discovery
-**Templates auto-discovered from**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
-
-Templates are dynamically read from development-focused directories:
-- `development/` - Feature implementation, component creation, refactoring
-- `automation/` - Project scaffolding, migration, deployment
-- `analysis/` - Architecture analysis, pattern detection
-- `integration/` - API design, database operations
-
-### Template Metadata Parsing
-
-Each template contains YAML frontmatter with:
-```yaml
----
-name: template-name
-description: Template purpose description
-category: development|automation|analysis|integration
-keywords: [keyword1, keyword2, keyword3]
-development_type: feature|component|refactor|debug|testing
----
-```
-
-**Auto-selection based on:**
-- **Development keywords**: Matches user input against development-specific keywords
-- **Template type**: Direct matching for development types
-- **Architecture patterns**: Semantic matching for system design
-- **Technology stack**: Framework and library detection
-
-## Command Execution
-
-### Step 1: Template Discovery
-```bash
-# Dynamically discover development templates
-cd "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts" && echo "Discovering development templates..." && for dir in development automation analysis integration; do if [ -d "$dir" ]; then echo "=== $dir templates ==="; for template_file in "$dir"/*.txt; do if [ -f "$template_file" ]; then echo "Template: $(basename "$template_file")"; head -10 "$template_file" 2>/dev/null | grep -E "^(name|description|keywords):" || echo "No metadata"; echo; fi; done; fi; done
-```
-
-### Step 2: Dynamic Template Analysis & Selection
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION select_development_template(user_input):
-  template_dirs = ["development", "automation", "analysis", "integration"]
-  template_metadata = {}
-  
-  # Parse all development templates for metadata
-  FOR each dir in template_dirs:
-    templates = list_files("~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/" + dir + "/*.txt")
-    FOR each template_file in templates:
-      content = read_file(template_file)
-      yaml_front = extract_yaml_frontmatter(content)
-      template_metadata[template_file] = {
-        "name": yaml_front.name,
-        "description": yaml_front.description,
-        "keywords": yaml_front.keywords || [],
-        "category": yaml_front.category || dir,
-        "development_type": yaml_front.development_type || "general"
-      }
-  
-  input_lower = user_input.toLowerCase()
-  best_match = null
-  highest_score = 0
-  
-  # Score each template against user input
-  FOR each template, metadata in template_metadata:
-    score = 0
-    
-    # Development keyword matching (highest weight)
-    development_keywords = ["implement", "create", "build", "develop", "add", "generate"]
-    FOR each dev_keyword in development_keywords:
-      IF input_lower.contains(dev_keyword):
-        score += 5
-    
-    # Template-specific keyword matching
-    FOR each keyword in metadata.keywords:
-      IF input_lower.contains(keyword.toLowerCase()):
-        score += 3
-    
-    # Development type matching
-    IF input_lower.contains(metadata.development_type.toLowerCase()):
-      score += 4
-    
-    # Technology stack detection
-    tech_keywords = ["react", "vue", "angular", "node", "express", "api", "database", "auth"]
-    FOR each tech in tech_keywords:
-      IF input_lower.contains(tech):
-        score += 2
-    
-    IF score > highest_score:
-      highest_score = score
-      best_match = template
-  
-  # Default to feature.txt for development tasks
-  RETURN best_match || "development/feature.txt"
-END FUNCTION
-```
-
-### Step 3: Execute with Full Auto Mode
-```bash
-# Autonomous development execution with comprehensive context
-codex --full-auto "@{**/*} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[selected_template])
-
-Development Task: [user_input]
-
-Autonomous Implementation Requirements:
-- Complete feature development
-- Code generation with best practices
-- Automatic testing integration
-- Documentation updates
-- Error handling and validation" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Essential Codex Auto Patterns
-
-**Required File Patterns** (Comprehensive context for autonomous development):
-```bash
-@{**/*}                    # All files for full context understanding
-@{src/**/*}               # Source code for pattern detection
-@{package.json,*.config.*} # Configuration and dependencies
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} # Project guidelines and standards
-@{test/**/*,**/*.test.*}   # Existing tests for pattern matching
-@{docs/**/*,README.*}      # Documentation for context
-```
-
-## Development Template Categories
-
-### Feature Development Templates
-- **feature.txt**: Complete feature implementation with integration
-- **component.txt**: Reusable component creation with props and state
-- **refactor.txt**: Code improvement and optimization
-
-### Automation Templates  
-- **scaffold.txt**: Project structure and boilerplate generation
-- **migration.txt**: System upgrades and data migrations
-- **deployment.txt**: CI/CD and deployment automation
-
-### Analysis Templates (for context)
-- **architecture.txt**: System structure understanding
-- **pattern.txt**: Code pattern detection for consistency
-- **security.txt**: Security analysis for safe development
-
-### Integration Templates
-- **api-design.txt**: RESTful API development
-- **database.txt**: Database schema and operations
-
-## Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--list-templates` | Show available development templates and exit |
-| `--template <name>` | Force specific template (overrides auto-selection) |
-| `--debug` | Show template selection reasoning and context patterns |
-| `--save-session` | Save complete development session to workflow |
-| `--no-auto` | Use `codex exec` instead of `--full-auto` mode |
-
-### Manual Template Override
-```bash
-# Force specific development template
-/codex:mode:auto "user authentication" --template component.txt
-/codex:mode:auto "fix login issues" --template debugging.txt
-```
-
-### Development Template Listing
-```bash
-# List all available development templates
-/codex:mode:auto --list-templates
-# Output:
-# Development templates in ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/:
-# - development/feature.txt (Complete feature implementation) [Keywords: implement, feature, integration]
-# - development/component.txt (Reusable component creation) [Keywords: component, react, vue]
-# - automation/scaffold.txt (Project structure generation) [Keywords: scaffold, setup, boilerplate]
-# - [any-new-template].txt (Auto-discovered from any category)
-```
-
-## Auto-Selection Examples
-
-### Development Task Detection
-```bash
-# Feature development → development/feature.txt
-"implement user dashboard with analytics charts" 
-
-# Component creation → development/component.txt
-"create reusable button component with multiple variants"
-
-# System architecture → automation/scaffold.txt
-"build complete e-commerce platform with React and Node.js"
-
-# API development → integration/api-design.txt
-"develop REST API for user management with authentication"
-
-# Performance optimization → development/refactor.txt
-"optimize React application performance and bundle size"
-```
-
-## Autonomous Development Workflow
-
-### Full Context Gathering
-1. **Project Analysis**: `@{**/*}` provides complete codebase context
-2. **Pattern Detection**: Understands existing code patterns and conventions
-3. **Dependency Analysis**: Reviews package.json and configuration files
-4. **Test Pattern Recognition**: Follows existing test structures
-
-### Intelligent Implementation
-1. **Architecture Decisions**: Makes informed choices based on existing patterns
-2. **Code Generation**: Creates code matching project style and conventions
-3. **Integration**: Ensures new code integrates seamlessly with existing system
-4. **Quality Assurance**: Includes error handling, validation, and testing
-
-### Autonomous Features
-- **Smart File Creation**: Creates necessary files and directories
-- **Dependency Management**: Adds required packages automatically
-- **Test Generation**: Creates comprehensive test suites
-- **Documentation Updates**: Updates relevant documentation files
-- **Configuration Updates**: Modifies config files as needed
-
-## Session Integration
-
-When `--save-session` used, saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/auto-[template]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Session includes:**
-- Original development request
-- Template selection reasoning
-- Complete context patterns used
-- Autonomous development results
-- Files created/modified
-- Integration guidance
-
-## Performance Features
-
-- **Parallel Context Loading**: Loads multiple file patterns simultaneously  
-- **Smart Caching**: Caches template selections for similar requests
-- **Progressive Development**: Builds features incrementally with validation
-- **Rollback Capability**: Can revert changes if issues detected
-
-## Codex vs Gemini Auto Mode
-
-| Feature | Codex Auto | Gemini Auto |
-|---------|------------|-------------|
-| Primary Purpose | Autonomous development | Analysis and planning |
-| File Loading | `@{**/*}` required | `--all-files` available |
-| Output | Complete implementations | Analysis and recommendations |
-| Template Focus | Development-oriented | Analysis-oriented |
-| Execution Mode | `--full-auto` autonomous | Interactive guidance |
-
-This command maximizes Codex's autonomous development capabilities while ensuring comprehensive context and intelligent template selection for optimal results.

.claude/commands/codex/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -1,269 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bug-index
-description: Bug analysis, debugging, and automated fix implementation using Codex
-usage: /codex:mode:bug-index "bug description"
-argument-hint: "description of the bug or error you're experiencing"
-examples:
-  - /codex:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error in login flow"
-  - /codex:mode:bug-index "React component not re-rendering after state change"
-  - /codex:mode:bug-index "database connection timeout in production"
-  - /codex:mode:bug-index "API endpoints returning 500 errors randomly"
-allowed-tools: Bash(codex:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Bug Analysis & Fix Command (/codex:mode:bug-index)
-
-## Overview
-Systematic bug analysis, debugging, and automated fix implementation using expert diagnostic templates with Codex CLI.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md
-
-⚠️ **Critical Difference**: Codex has **NO `--all-files` flag** - you MUST use `@` patterns to reference files.
-
-**Enhancement over Gemini**: Codex can **analyze AND implement fixes**, not just provide recommendations.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Bug Analysis & Fix
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "authentication error during login"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*auth*,**/*login*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt)" -s danger-full-access`
-
-### Comprehensive Bug Investigation
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "React state not updating in dashboard"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx},**/*dashboard*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt)" -s danger-full-access`
-
-### Production Error Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "API timeout issues in production environment"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{**/api/**/*,*.config.*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt)" -s danger-full-access`
-
-## Codex-Specific Debugging Patterns
-
-**Essential File Patterns** (Required for effective debugging):
-```bash
-@{**/*error*,**/*bug*}     # Error-related files
-@{src/**/*}               # Source code for bug analysis
-@{**/logs/**/*}           # Log files for error traces
-@{test/**/*,**/*.test.*}   # Tests to understand expected behavior
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} # Project guidelines
-@{*.config.*,package.json} # Configuration for environment issues
-```
-
-## Command Execution
-
-**Debugging Template Used**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt`
-
-**Executes**:
-```bash
-codex exec "@{inferred_bug_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt)
-
-Context: Comprehensive codebase analysis for bug investigation
-Bug Description: [user_description]
-Fix Implementation: Provide working code solutions" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Bug Pattern Inference
-
-**Auto-detects relevant files based on bug description:**
-
-| Bug Keywords | Inferred Patterns | Focus Area |
-|-------------|------------------|------------|
-| "auth", "login", "token" | `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*,**/*login*}` | Authentication code |
-| "React", "component", "render" | `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}` | React components |
-| "API", "endpoint", "server" | `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}` | Backend code |
-| "database", "db", "query" | `@{**/models/**/*,**/db/**/*}` | Database code |
-| "timeout", "connection" | `@{*.config.*,**/*config*}` | Configuration issues |
-| "test", "spec" | `@{test/**/*,**/*.test.*}` | Test-related bugs |
-| "build", "compile" | `@{*.config.*,package.json,webpack.*}` | Build issues |
-| "style", "css", "layout" | `@{**/*.{css,scss,sass}}` | Styling bugs |
-
-## Analysis & Fix Focus
-
-### Comprehensive Bug Analysis Provides:
-- **Root Cause Analysis**: Systematic investigation with file:line references
-- **Code Path Tracing**: Following execution flow through the codebase
-- **Error Pattern Detection**: Identifying similar issues across the codebase
-- **Context Understanding**: Leveraging existing code patterns
-- **Impact Assessment**: Understanding potential side effects of fixes
-
-### Codex Enhancement - Automated Fixes:
-- **Working Code Solutions**: Actual implementation fixes
-- **Multiple Fix Options**: Different approaches with trade-offs
-- **Test Case Generation**: Tests to prevent regression
-- **Configuration Updates**: Environment and config fixes
-- **Documentation Updates**: Updated comments and documentation
-
-## Debugging Templates & Approaches
-
-### Error Investigation
-```bash
-# Uses: debugging.txt template for systematic analysis
-/codex:mode:bug-index "null pointer exception in user service"
-# Provides: Stack trace analysis, variable state inspection, fix implementation
-```
-
-### Performance Bug Analysis
-```bash
-# Uses: debugging.txt + performance.txt combination
-/codex:mode:bug-index "slow database queries causing timeout"
-# Provides: Query optimization, indexing suggestions, connection pool fixes
-```
-
-### Integration Bug Fixes
-```bash
-# Uses: debugging.txt + integration/api-design.txt
-/codex:mode:bug-index "third-party API integration failing randomly"
-# Provides: Error handling, retry logic, fallback implementations
-```
-
-## Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--comprehensive` | Use `@{**/*}` for complete codebase analysis |
-| `--save-session` | Save bug analysis and fixes to workflow session |
-| `--implement-fix` | Auto-implement the recommended fix (default in Codex) |
-| `--generate-tests` | Create tests to prevent regression |
-| `--debug-mode` | Verbose debugging output with pattern explanations |
-
-### Comprehensive Debugging
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "intermittent authentication failures" --comprehensive
-# Uses: @{**/*} for complete system analysis
-```
-
-### Bug Fix with Testing
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "user registration validation errors" --generate-tests
-# Provides: Bug fix + comprehensive test suite
-```
-
-## Session Output
-
-When `--save-session` used, saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Session includes:**
-- Bug description and symptoms
-- File patterns used for analysis
-- Root cause analysis with evidence
-- Implemented fix with code changes
-- Test cases to prevent regression
-- Monitoring and prevention recommendations
-
-## Debugging Output Structure
-
-### Bug Analysis Template Output:
-```markdown
-# Bug Analysis: [Description]
-
-## Problem Investigation
-- Symptoms and error messages
-- Affected components and files
-- Reproduction steps
-
-## Root Cause Analysis
-- Code path analysis with file:line references
-- Variable states and data flow
-- Configuration and environment factors
-
-## Implemented Fixes
-- Primary solution with code changes
-- Alternative approaches considered
-- Trade-offs and design decisions
-
-## Testing & Validation
-- Test cases to verify fix
-- Regression prevention tests
-- Performance impact assessment
-
-## Monitoring & Prevention
-- Error handling improvements
-- Logging enhancements  
-- Code quality improvements
-```
-
-## Context-Aware Bug Fixing
-
-### Existing Pattern Integration
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "authentication middleware not working"
-# Analyzes existing auth patterns in codebase
-# Implements fix consistent with current architecture
-# Updates related middleware to match patterns
-```
-
-### Technology Stack Compatibility
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "React hooks causing infinite renders"
-# Reviews current React version and patterns
-# Implements fix using appropriate hooks API
-# Updates other components with similar issues
-```
-
-## Advanced Debugging Features
-
-### Multi-File Bug Tracking
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "user data inconsistency between frontend and backend"
-# Analyzes both frontend and backend code
-# Identifies data flow discrepancies  
-# Implements synchronized fixes across stack
-```
-
-### Production Issue Investigation
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "memory leak in production server"
-# Reviews server code and configuration
-# Analyzes log patterns and resource usage
-# Implements monitoring and leak prevention
-```
-
-### Error Handling Enhancement
-```bash
-/codex:mode:bug-index "unhandled promise rejections causing crashes"
-# Identifies all async operations without error handling
-# Implements comprehensive error handling strategy
-# Adds logging and monitoring for similar issues
-```
-
-## Bug Prevention Features
-
-- **Pattern Analysis**: Identifies similar bugs across codebase
-- **Code Quality Improvements**: Suggests structural improvements
-- **Error Handling Enhancement**: Adds robust error handling
-- **Test Coverage**: Creates tests to prevent similar issues
-- **Documentation Updates**: Improves code documentation
-
-## Codex vs Gemini Bug Analysis
-
-| Feature | Codex Bug-Index | Gemini Bug-Index |
-|---------|-----------------|------------------|
-| File Context | `@` patterns **required** | `--all-files` available |
-| Output | Analysis + working fixes | Analysis + recommendations |
-| Implementation | Automatic code changes | Manual implementation needed |
-| Testing | Auto-generates test cases | Suggests testing approach |
-| Integration | Updates related code | Focuses on specific bug |
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-### Bug Fixing Workflow
-```bash
-# 1. Analyze and fix the bug
-/codex:mode:bug-index "user login failing with token errors"
-
-# 2. Review the implemented changes
-/workflow:review
-
-# 3. Execute any additional tasks identified
-/codex:execute "implement additional error handling for edge cases"
-```
-
-For detailed syntax, patterns, and advanced usage see:
-**@~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md**

.claude/commands/codex/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,260 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan
-description: Development planning and implementation strategy using specialized templates with Codex
-usage: /codex:mode:plan "planning topic"
-argument-hint: "development planning topic or implementation challenge"
-examples:
-  - /codex:mode:plan "design user dashboard feature architecture"
-  - /codex:mode:plan "plan microservices migration with implementation"
-  - /codex:mode:plan "implement real-time notification system with React"
-allowed-tools: Bash(codex:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Development Planning Command (/codex:mode:plan)
-
-## Overview
-Comprehensive development planning and implementation strategy using expert planning templates with Codex CLI.
--   **Directory Analysis Rule**: When user intends to analyze specific directory (cd XXX), use: `codex --cd XXX --full-auto exec "prompt" -s danger-full-access` or `cd "XXX" && codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*} prompt" -s danger-full-access`
--   **Default Mode**: `--full-auto exec` autonomous development mode (RECOMMENDED for all tasks).
-
-
-⚠️ **Critical Difference**: Codex has **NO `--all-files` flag** - you MUST use `@` patterns to reference files.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Development Planning
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "design authentication system with implementation"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/task-breakdown.txt) design authentication system with implementation" -s danger-full-access`
-
-### Architecture Planning with Context
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "microservices migration strategy"
-```
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{src/**/*,*.config.*,CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/migration.txt) microservices migration strategy" -s danger-full-access`
-
-### Feature Implementation Planning
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "real-time notifications with WebSocket integration"
-```
-
-**Executes**: `codex --full-auto exec "@{**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt) Additional Planning Context:$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/task-breakdown.txt) real-time notifications with WebSocket integration" -s danger-full-access`
-
-## Codex-Specific Planning Patterns
-
-**Essential File Patterns** (Required for comprehensive planning):
-```bash
-@{**/*}                    # All files for complete context
-@{src/**/*}               # Source code architecture
-@{*.config.*,package.json} # Configuration and dependencies
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} # Project guidelines
-@{docs/**/*,README.*}      # Documentation for context
-@{test/**/*}              # Testing patterns
-```
-
-## Command Execution
-
-**Planning Templates Used**: 
-- Primary: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/task-breakdown.txt`
-- Migration: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/migration.txt`
-- Combined with development templates for implementation guidance
-
-**Executes**:
-```bash
-codex exec "@{**/*} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/task-breakdown.txt)
-
-Context: Complete codebase analysis for informed planning
-Planning Topic: [user_description]
-Implementation Focus: Development strategy with code generation guidance"
-```
-
-## Planning Focus Areas
-
-### Development Planning Provides:
-- **Requirements Analysis**: Functional and technical requirements
-- **Architecture Design**: System structure with implementation details  
-- **Implementation Strategy**: Step-by-step development approach with code examples
-- **Technology Selection**: Framework and library recommendations
-- **Task Decomposition**: Detailed task breakdown with dependencies
-- **Code Structure Planning**: File organization and module design
-- **Testing Strategy**: Test planning and coverage approach
-- **Integration Planning**: API design and data flow
-
-### Codex Enhancement:
-- **Implementation Guidance**: Actual code patterns and examples
-- **Automated Scaffolding**: Template generation for planned components
-- **Dependency Analysis**: Required packages and configurations
-- **Pattern Detection**: Leverages existing codebase patterns
-
-## Planning Templates
-
-### Task Breakdown Planning
-```bash
-# Uses: planning/task-breakdown.txt
-/codex:mode:plan "implement user authentication system"
-# Provides: Detailed task list, dependencies, implementation order
-```
-
-### Migration Planning
-```bash
-# Uses: planning/migration.txt
-/codex:mode:plan "migrate from REST to GraphQL API"
-# Provides: Migration strategy, compatibility planning, rollout approach
-```
-
-### Feature Planning with Implementation
-```bash
-# Uses: development/feature.txt + planning/task-breakdown.txt
-/codex:mode:plan "build real-time chat application"
-# Provides: Architecture + implementation roadmap + code examples
-```
-
-## Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--comprehensive` | Use `@{**/*}` for complete codebase context |
-| `--save-session` | Save planning analysis to workflow session |
-| `--with-implementation` | Include code generation in planning |
-| `--template <name>` | Force specific planning template |
-
-### Comprehensive Planning
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "design payment system architecture" --comprehensive
-# Uses: @{**/*} pattern for maximum context
-```
-
-### Planning with Implementation
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "implement user dashboard" --with-implementation
-# Combines planning templates with development templates for actionable output
-```
-
-## Session Output
-
-When `--save-session` used, saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Session includes:**
-- Planning topic and requirements
-- Template combination used
-- Complete architecture analysis
-- Implementation roadmap with tasks
-- Code structure recommendations
-- Technology stack decisions
-- Integration strategies
-- Next steps and action items
-
-## Planning Template Structure
-
-### Task Breakdown Template Output:
-```markdown
-# Development Plan: [Topic]
-
-## Requirements Analysis
-- Functional requirements
-- Technical requirements
-- Constraints and dependencies
-
-## Architecture Design
-- System components
-- Data flow
-- Integration points
-
-## Implementation Strategy
-- Development phases
-- Task breakdown
-- Dependencies and blockers
-- Estimated effort
-
-## Code Structure
-- File organization
-- Module design
-- Component hierarchy
-
-## Technology Decisions
-- Framework selection
-- Library recommendations
-- Configuration requirements
-
-## Testing Approach
-- Testing strategy
-- Coverage requirements
-- Test automation
-
-## Action Items
-- [ ] Detailed task list with priorities
-- [ ] Implementation order
-- [ ] Review checkpoints
-```
-
-## Context-Aware Planning
-
-### Existing Codebase Integration
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "add user roles and permissions system"
-# Analyzes existing authentication patterns
-# Plans integration with current user management
-# Suggests compatible implementation approach
-```
-
-### Technology Stack Analysis
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "implement real-time features"
-# Reviews current tech stack (React, Node.js, etc.)
-# Recommends compatible WebSocket/SSE solutions
-# Plans integration with existing architecture
-```
-
-## Planning Workflow Integration
-
-### Pre-Development Planning
-1. **Architecture Analysis**: Understand current system structure
-2. **Requirement Planning**: Define scope and objectives
-3. **Implementation Strategy**: Create detailed development plan
-4. **Task Creation**: Generate actionable tasks for execution
-
-### Planning to Execution Flow
-```bash
-# 1. Plan the implementation
-/codex:mode:plan "implement user dashboard with analytics"
-
-# 2. Execute the plan
-/codex:execute "implement user dashboard based on planning analysis"
-
-# 3. Review and iterate
-/workflow:review
-```
-
-## Codex vs Gemini Planning
-
-| Feature | Codex Planning | Gemini Planning |
-|---------|----------------|-----------------|
-| File Context | `@` patterns **required** | `--all-files` available |
-| Output Focus | Implementation-ready plans | Analysis and strategy |
-| Code Examples | Includes actual code patterns | Conceptual guidance |
-| Integration | Direct execution pathway | Planning only |
-| Templates | Development + planning combined | Planning focused |
-
-## Advanced Planning Features
-
-### Multi-Phase Planning
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "modernize legacy application architecture"
-# Provides: Phase-by-phase migration strategy
-# Includes: Compatibility planning, risk assessment
-# Generates: Implementation timeline with milestones
-```
-
-### Cross-System Integration Planning
-```bash
-/codex:mode:plan "integrate third-party payment system with existing e-commerce"
-# Analyzes: Current system architecture
-# Plans: Integration approach and data flow
-# Recommends: Security and error handling strategies
-```
-
-For detailed syntax, patterns, and advanced usage see:
-**@~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md**

.claude/commands/enhance-prompt.md

@@ -1,201 +1,117 @@
 ---
 name: enhance-prompt
-description: Dynamic prompt enhancement for complex requirements - Structured enhancement of user prompts before agent execution
+description: Context-aware prompt enhancement using session memory and codebase analysis
 usage: /enhance-prompt <user_input>
-argument-hint: [--gemini] "user input to enhance"
+argument-hint: "user input to enhance"
 examples:
   - /enhance-prompt "add user profile editing"
   - /enhance-prompt "fix login button"
   - /enhance-prompt "clean up the payment code"
 ---
 
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/enhance-prompt`**
+## Overview
 
--   **Type**: Prompt Engineering Command
--   **Purpose**: To systematically enhance raw user prompts, translating them into clear, context-rich, and actionable specifications before agent execution.
--   **Key Feature**: Dynamically integrates with Gemini for deep, codebase-aware analysis.
+Systematically enhances user prompts by combining session memory context with codebase patterns, translating ambiguous requests into actionable specifications.
 
-### 📥 **Command Parameters**
+## Core Protocol
 
--   `<user_input>`: **(Required)** The raw text prompt from the user that needs enhancement.
--   `--gemini`: **(Optional)** An explicit flag to force the full Gemini collaboration flow, ensuring codebase analysis is performed even for simple prompts.
+**Enhancement Pipeline:**
+`Intent Translation` → `Context Integration` → `Gemini Analysis (if needed)` → `Structured Output`
 
-### 🔄 **Core Enhancement Protocol**
+**Context Sources:**
+- Session memory (conversation history, previous analysis)
+- Codebase patterns (via Gemini when triggered)
+- Implicit technical requirements
 
-This is the standard pipeline every prompt goes through for structured enhancement.
-
-`Step 1: Intent Translation` **->** `Step 2: Context Extraction` **->** `Step 3: Key Points Identification` **->** `Step 4: Optional Gemini Consultation`
-
-### 🧠 **Gemini Collaboration Logic**
-
-This logic determines when to invoke Gemini for deeper, codebase-aware insights.
+## Gemini Trigger Logic
 
 ```pseudo
-FUNCTION decide_enhancement_path(user_prompt, options):
-  // Set of keywords that indicate high complexity or architectural changes.
+FUNCTION should_use_gemini(user_prompt):
   critical_keywords = ["refactor", "migrate", "redesign", "auth", "payment", "security"]
 
-  // Conditions for triggering Gemini analysis.
-  use_gemini = FALSE
-  IF options.gemini_flag is TRUE:
-    use_gemini = TRUE
-  ELSE IF prompt_affects_multiple_modules(user_prompt, threshold=3):
-    use_gemini = TRUE
-  ELSE IF any_keyword_in_prompt(critical_keywords, user_prompt):
-    use_gemini = TRUE
-
-  // Execute the appropriate enhancement flow.
-  enhanced_prompt = run_standard_enhancement(user_prompt) // Steps 1-3
-
-  IF use_gemini is TRUE:
-    // This action corresponds to calling the Gemini CLI tool programmatically.
-    // e.g., `gemini --all-files -p "..."` based on the derived context.
-    gemini_insights = execute_tool("gemini","-P" enhanced_prompt) // Calls the Gemini CLI
-    enhanced_prompt.append(gemini_insights)
-
-  RETURN enhanced_prompt
-END FUNCTION
+  RETURN (
+    prompt_affects_multiple_modules(user_prompt, threshold=3) OR
+    any_keyword_in_prompt(critical_keywords, user_prompt)
+  )
+END
 ```
 
-### 📚 **Enhancement Rules**
+**Gemini Integration:** @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
 
--   **Ambiguity Resolution**: Generic terms are translated into specific technical intents.
-    -   `"fix"` → Identify the specific bug and preserve existing functionality.
-    -   `"improve"` → Enhance performance or readability while maintaining compatibility.
-    -   `"add"` → Implement a new feature and integrate it with existing code.
-    -   `"refactor"` → Restructure code to improve quality while preserving external behavior.
--   **Implicit Context Inference**: Missing technical context is automatically inferred.
-    ```bash
-    # User: "add login"
-    # Inferred Context:
-    # - Authentication system implementation
-    # - Frontend login form + backend validation
-    # - Session management considerations
-    # - Security best practices (e.g., password handling)
-    ```
--   **Technical Translation**: Business goals are converted into technical specifications.
-    ```bash
-    # User: "make it faster"
-    # Translated Intent:
-    # - Identify performance bottlenecks
-    # - Define target metrics/benchmarks
-    # - Profile before optimizing
-    # - Document performance gains and trade-offs
-    ```
+## Enhancement Rules
 
-### 🗺️ **Enhancement Translation Matrix**
+### Intent Translation
 
-| User Says          | → Translate To          | Key Context             | Focus Areas                 |
-| ------------------ | ----------------------- | ----------------------- | --------------------------- |
-| "make it work"     | Fix functionality       | Debug implementation    | Root cause → fix → test     |
-| "add [feature]"    | Implement capability    | Integration points      | Core function + edge cases  |
-| "improve [area]"   | Optimize/enhance        | Current limits          | Measurable improvements     |
-| "fix [bug]"        | Resolve issue           | Bug symptoms            | Root cause + prevention     |
-| "refactor [code]"  | Restructure quality     | Structure pain points   | Maintain behavior           |
-| "update [component]" | Modernize               | Version compatibility   | Migration path              |
+| User Says | Translate To | Focus |
+|-----------|--------------|-------|
+| "fix" | Debug and resolve | Root cause → preserve behavior |
+| "improve" | Enhance/optimize | Performance/readability |
+| "add" | Implement feature | Integration + edge cases |
+| "refactor" | Restructure quality | Maintain behavior |
+| "update" | Modernize | Version compatibility |
 
-### ⚡ **Automatic Invocation Triggers**
+### Context Integration Strategy
 
-The `/enhance-prompt` command is designed to run automatically when the system detects:
--   Ambiguous user language (e.g., "fix", "improve", "clean up").
--   Tasks impacting multiple modules or components (>3).
--   Requests for system architecture changes.
--   Modifications to critical systems (auth, payment, security).
--   Complex refactoring requests.
+**Session Memory First:**
+- Reference recent conversation context
+- Reuse previously identified patterns
+- Build on established understanding
 
-### 🛠️ **Gemini Integration Protocol (Internal)**
+**Codebase Analysis (via Gemini):**
+- Only when complexity requires it
+- Focus on integration points
+- Identify existing patterns
 
-**Gemini Integration**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-This section details how the system programmatically interacts with the Gemini CLI.
--   **Primary Tool**: All Gemini analysis is performed via direct calls to the `gemini` command-line tool (e.g., `gemini --all-files -p "..."`).
--   **Central Guidelines**: All CLI usage patterns, syntax, and context detection rules are defined in the central guidelines document:
--   **Template Selection**: For specific analysis types, the system references the template selection guide:
-    -   **All Templates**: `gemini-template-rules.md` - provides guidance on selecting appropriate templates
-    -   **Template Library**: `cli-templates/` - contains actual prompt and command templates
-
-### 📝 **Enhancement Examples**
-
-This card contains the original, unmodified examples to demonstrate the command's output.
-
-#### Example 1: Feature Request (with Gemini Integration)
+**Example:**
 ```bash
-# User Input: "add user profile editing"
-
-# Standard Enhancement:
-TRANSLATED_INTENT: Implement user profile editing feature
-DOMAIN_CONTEXT: User management system
-ACTION_TYPE: Create new feature
-COMPLEXITY: Medium (multi-component)
-
-# Gemini Analysis Added:
-GEMINI_PATTERN_ANALYSIS: FormValidator used in AccountSettings, PreferencesEditor
-GEMINI_ARCHITECTURE: UserService → ProfileRepository → UserModel pattern
-
-# Final Enhanced Structure:
-ENRICHED_CONTEXT:
-- Frontend: Profile form using FormValidator pattern
-- Backend: API endpoints following UserService pattern
-- Database: User model via ProfileRepository
-- Auth: Permission checks using AuthGuard pattern
-
-KEY_POINTS:
-- Data validation using existing FormValidator
-- Image upload via SecureUploadService
-- Field permissions with AuthGuard middleware
-
-ATTENTION_AREAS:
-- Security: Use SecureUploadService for file handling
-- Performance: Lazy loading patterns (ProfileImage.tsx)
+# User: "add login"
+# Session Memory: Previous auth discussion, JWT mentioned
+# Inferred: JWT-based auth, integrate with existing session management
+# Gemini (if multi-module): Analyze AuthService patterns, middleware structure
 ```
 
-#### Example 2: Bug Fix
+## Output Structure
+
 ```bash
-# User Input: "login button doesn't work"
-
-# Enhanced Structure:
-TRANSLATED_INTENT: Debug and fix non-functional login button
-DOMAIN_CONTEXT: Authentication UI
-ACTION_TYPE: Fix bug
-COMPLEXITY: Simple (single component)
-
-KEY_POINTS:
-- Identify root cause (event/state/API)
-- Preserve existing auth flow
-- Add error handling if missing
-
-ATTENTION_AREAS:
-- Don't break existing functionality
-- Test edge cases and user states
+INTENT: [Clear technical goal]
+CONTEXT: [Session memory + codebase patterns]
+ACTION: [Specific implementation steps]
+ATTENTION: [Critical constraints]
 ```
 
-#### Example 3: Refactoring Request
+### Output Examples
+
+**Simple (no Gemini):**
 ```bash
-# User Input: "clean up the payment code"
-
-# Enhanced Structure:
-TRANSLATED_INTENT: Refactor payment module for maintainability
-DOMAIN_CONTEXT: Payment processing system
-ACTION_TYPE: Refactor
-COMPLEXITY: Complex (critical system)
-
-KEY_POINTS:
-- Maintain exact functionality
-- Improve code organization
-- Extract reusable components
-
-ATTENTION_AREAS:
-- Critical: No behavior changes
-- Security: Maintain PCI compliance
-- Testing: Comprehensive coverage
+# Input: "fix login button"
+INTENT: Debug non-functional login button
+CONTEXT: From session - OAuth flow discussed, known state issue
+ACTION: Check event binding → verify state updates → test auth flow
+ATTENTION: Preserve existing OAuth integration
 ```
 
-### ✨ **Key Benefits**
+**Complex (with Gemini):**
+```bash
+# Input: "refactor payment code"
+INTENT: Restructure payment module for maintainability
+CONTEXT: Session memory - PCI compliance requirements
+         Gemini - PaymentService → StripeAdapter pattern identified
+ACTION: Extract reusable validators → isolate payment gateway logic
+ATTENTION: Zero behavior change, maintain PCI compliance, full test coverage
+```
 
-1.  **Clarity**: Ambiguous requests become clear specifications.
-2.  **Completeness**: Implicit requirements become explicit.
-3.  **Context**: Missing context is automatically inferred.
-4.  **Codebase Awareness**: Gemini provides actual patterns from the project.
-5.  **Quality**: Attention areas prevent common mistakes.
-6.  **Efficiency**: Agents receive structured, actionable input.
-7.  **Smart Flow Control**: Seamless integration with workflows.
+## Automatic Triggers
+
+- Ambiguous language: "fix", "improve", "clean up"
+- Multi-module impact (>3 modules)
+- Architecture changes
+- Critical systems: auth, payment, security
+- Complex refactoring
+
+## Key Principles
+
+1. **Memory First**: Leverage session context before analysis
+2. **Minimal Gemini**: Only when complexity demands it
+3. **Context Reuse**: Build on previous understanding
+4. **Clear Output**: Structured, actionable specifications
+5. **Avoid Duplication**: Reference existing context, don't repeat

.claude/commands/gemini/analyze.md

@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
----
-name: analyze
-description: Quick analysis of codebase patterns, architecture, and code quality using Gemini CLI
-usage: /gemini:analyze <analysis-type>
-argument-hint: "analysis target or type"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:analyze "React hooks patterns"
-  - /gemini:analyze "authentication security"
-  - /gemini:analyze "performance bottlenecks"
-  - /gemini:analyze "API design patterns"
-model: haiku
----
-
-# Gemini Analysis Command (/gemini:analyze)
-
-## Overview
-Quick analysis tool for codebase insights using intelligent pattern detection and template-driven analysis.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-## Analysis Types
-
-| Type | Purpose | Example |
-|------|---------|---------|
-| **pattern** | Code pattern detection | "React hooks usage patterns" |
-| **architecture** | System structure analysis | "component hierarchy structure" |
-| **security** | Security vulnerabilities | "authentication vulnerabilities" |
-| **performance** | Performance bottlenecks | "rendering performance issues" |
-| **quality** | Code quality assessment | "testing coverage analysis" |
-| **dependencies** | Third-party analysis | "outdated package dependencies" |
-
-## Quick Usage
-
-### Basic Analysis
-```bash
-/gemini:analyze "authentication patterns"
-```
-**Executes**: `gemini -p -a "@{**/*auth*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(template:analysis/pattern.txt)"`
-
-### Targeted Analysis
-```bash
-/gemini:analyze "React component architecture"
-```
-**Executes**: `gemini -p -a "@{src/components/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(template:analysis/architecture.txt)"`
-
-### Security Focus
-```bash
-/gemini:analyze "API security vulnerabilities"
-```
-**Executes**: `gemini -p -a "@{**/api/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(template:analysis/security.txt)"`
-
-## Templates Used
-
-Templates are automatically selected based on analysis type:
-- **Pattern Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt`
-- **Architecture Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt`
-- **Security Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/security.txt`
-- **Performance Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/performance.txt`
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-⚠️ **Session Check**: Automatically detects active workflow session via `.workflow/.active-*` marker file.
-
-**Analysis results saved to:**
-- Active session: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/analysis-[timestamp].md`
-- No session: Temporary analysis output
-
-## Common Patterns
-
-### Technology Stack Analysis
-```bash
-/gemini:analyze "project technology stack"
-# Auto-detects: package.json, config files, dependencies
-```
-
-### Code Quality Review
-```bash
-/gemini:analyze "code quality and standards"
-# Auto-targets: source files, test files, CLAUDE.md
-```
-
-### Migration Planning
-```bash
-/gemini:analyze "legacy code modernization"
-# Focuses: older patterns, deprecated APIs, upgrade paths
-```
-
-## Output Format
-
-Analysis results include:
-- **File References**: Specific file:line locations
-- **Code Examples**: Relevant code snippets
-- **Patterns Found**: Common patterns and anti-patterns
-- **Recommendations**: Actionable improvements
-- **Integration Points**: How components connect
-

.claude/commands/gemini/chat.md

@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
----
-name: chat
-
-description: Simple Gemini CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
-usage: /gemini:chat "inquiry"
-argument-hint: "your question or analysis request"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-  - /gemini:chat "how can I optimize this React component performance?"
-  - /gemini:chat "review security vulnerabilities in src/auth/"
-allowed-tools: Bash(gemini:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/gemini:chat`**
-
--   **Type**: Basic Gemini CLI Wrapper
--   **Purpose**: Direct interaction with the `gemini` CLI for simple codebase analysis
--   **Core Tool**: `Bash(gemini:*)` - Executes the external Gemini CLI tool
-
-### 📥 **Parameters & Usage**
-
--   **`<inquiry>` (Required)**: Your question or analysis request
--   **`--all-files` (Optional)**: Includes the entire codebase in the analysis context
--   **`--save-session` (Optional)**: Saves the interaction to current workflow session directory
--   **File References**: Specify files or patterns using `@{path/to/file}` syntax
-
-### 🔄 **Execution Workflow**
-
-`Parse Input` **->** `Assemble Context` **->** `Construct Prompt` **->** `Execute Gemini CLI` **->** `(Optional) Save Session`
-
-### 📚 **Context Assembly**
-
-Context is gathered from:
-1. **Project Guidelines**: Always includes `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-2. **User-Explicit Files**: Files specified by the user (e.g., `@{src/auth/*.js}`)
-3. **All Files Flag**: The `--all-files` flag includes the entire codebase
-
-### 📝 **Prompt Format**
-
-```
-=== CONTEXT ===
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [Project guidelines]
-@{target_files} [User-specified files or all files if --all-files is used]
-
-=== USER INPUT ===
-[The user inquiry text]
-```
-
-### ⚙️ **Execution Implementation**
-
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION execute_gemini_chat(user_inquiry, flags):
-  // Construct basic prompt
-  prompt = "=== CONTEXT ===\n"
-  prompt += "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}\n"
-  
-  // Add user-specified files or all files
-  IF flags contain "--all-files":
-    result = execute_tool("Bash(gemini:*)", "--all-files", "-p", prompt + user_inquiry)
-  ELSE:
-    prompt += "\n=== USER INPUT ===\n" + user_inquiry
-    result = execute_tool("Bash(gemini:*)", "-p", prompt)
-  
-  // Save session if requested
-  IF flags contain "--save-session":
-    save_chat_session(user_inquiry, result)
-  
-  RETURN result
-END FUNCTION
-```
-
-### 💾 **Session Persistence**
-
-When `--save-session` flag is used:
--   Check for existing active session (`.workflow/.active-*` markers)
--   Save to existing session's `.chat/` directory or create new session
--   File format: `chat-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.md`
--   Include query, context, and response in saved file
-
-**Session Template:**
-```markdown
-# Chat Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Query
-[Original user inquiry]
-
-## Context
-[Files and patterns included in analysis]
-
-## Gemini Response
-[Complete response from Gemini CLI]
-```

.claude/commands/gemini/execute.md

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
----
-name: execute
-description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference
-usage: /gemini:execute <description|task-id>
-argument-hint: "implementation description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:execute "implement user authentication system" 
-  - /gemini:execute "optimize React component performance"
-  - /gemini:execute IMPL-001 
-  - /gemini:execute "fix API performance issues"
-allowed-tools: Bash(gemini:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Gemini Execute Command (/gemini:execute)
-
-## Overview
-
-**⚡ YOLO-enabled execution**: Auto-approves all confirmations for streamlined implementation workflow.
-
-**Purpose**: Execute implementation tasks using intelligent context inference and Gemini CLI with full permissions.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-## 🚨 YOLO Permissions
-
-**All confirmations auto-approved by default:**
-- ✅ File pattern inference confirmation
-- ✅ Gemini execution confirmation  
-- ✅ File modification confirmation
-- ✅ Implementation summary generation
-
-## Execution Modes
-
-### 1. Description Mode
-**Input**: Natural language description
-```bash
-/gemini:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-```
-**Process**: Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Context collection → Execution
-
-### 2. Task ID Mode  
-**Input**: Workflow task identifier
-```bash
-/gemini:execute IMPL-001
-```
-**Process**: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Context integration → Execution
-
-## Context Inference Logic
-
-**Auto-selects relevant files based on:**
-- **Keywords**: "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- **Technology**: "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
-- **Task Type**: "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- **Always includes**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-
-## Command Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--debug` | Verbose execution logging |
-| `--save-session` | Save complete execution session to workflow |
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-### Session Management
-⚠️ **Auto-detects active session**: Checks `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
-
-**Session storage:**
-- **Active session exists**: Saves to `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session**: Creates new session directory
-
-### Task Integration
-```bash
-# Execute specific workflow task
-/gemini:execute IMPL-001
-
-# Loads from: .task/IMPL-001.json
-# Uses: task context, brainstorming refs, scope definitions
-# Updates: workflow status, generates summary
-```
-
-## Execution Templates
-
-### User Description Template
-```bash
-gemini --all-files -p "@{inferred_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Implementation Task: [user_description]
-
-Provide:
-- Specific implementation code
-- File modification locations (file:line)
-- Test cases
-- Integration guidance"
-```
-
-### Task ID Template
-```bash
-gemini --all-files -p "@{task_files} @{brainstorming_refs} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Task: [task_title] (ID: [task-id])
-Type: [task_type]
-Scope: [task_scope]
-
-Execute implementation following task acceptance criteria."
-```
-
-## Auto-Generated Outputs
-
-### 1. Implementation Summary
-**Location**: `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` or auto-generated ID
-
-```markdown
-# Task Summary: [Task-ID] [Description]
-
-## Implementation
-- **Files Modified**: [file:line references]
-- **Features Added**: [specific functionality]
-- **Context Used**: [inferred patterns]
-
-## Integration
-- [Links to workflow documents]
-```
-
-### 2. Execution Session
-**Location**: `.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-
-```markdown
-# Execution Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Input
-[User description or Task ID]
-
-## Context Inference
-[File patterns used with rationale]
-
-## Implementation Results
-[Generated code and modifications]
-
-## Status Updates
-[Workflow integration updates]
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Task ID not found**: Lists available tasks
-- **Pattern inference failure**: Uses generic `src/**/*` pattern
-- **Execution failure**: Attempts fallback with simplified context
-- **File modification errors**: Reports specific file/permission issues
-
-## Performance Features
-
-- **Smart caching**: Frequently used pattern mappings
-- **Progressive inference**: Precise → broad pattern fallback
-- **Parallel execution**: When multiple contexts needed
-- **Directory optimization**: Switches to optimal execution path
-
-## Integration Workflow
-
-**Typical sequence:**
-1. `workflow:plan` → Creates tasks
-2. `/gemini:execute IMPL-001` → Executes with YOLO permissions
-3. Auto-updates workflow status and generates summaries
-4. `workflow:review` → Final validation
-
-**vs. `/gemini:analyze`**: Execute performs analysis **and implementation**, analyze is read-only.
-

.claude/commands/gemini/mode/auto.md

@@ -1,188 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto
-description: Auto-select and execute appropriate template based on user input analysis
-usage: /gemini:mode:auto "description of task or problem"
-argument-hint: "description of what you want to analyze or plan"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:mode:auto "authentication system keeps crashing during login"
-  - /gemini:mode:auto "design a real-time notification architecture"
-  - /gemini:mode:auto "database connection errors in production"
-  - /gemini:mode:auto "plan user dashboard with analytics features"
-allowed-tools: Bash(ls:*), Bash(gemini:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Auto Template Selection (/gemini:mode:auto)
-
-## Overview
-Automatically analyzes user input to select the most appropriate template and execute Gemini CLI with optimal context.
-
-**Directory Analysis Rule**: Intelligent detection of directory context intent - automatically navigate to target directory when analysis scope is directory-specific.
-
-**--cd Parameter Rule**: When `--cd` parameter is provided, always execute `cd "[path]" && gemini --all-files -p "prompt"` to ensure analysis occurs in the specified directory context.
-
-**Process**: List Templates → Analyze Input → Select Template → Execute with Context
-
-## Usage
-
-### Auto-Detection Examples
-```bash
-# Bug-related keywords → selects bug-fix.md
-/gemini:mode:auto "React component not rendering after state update"
-
-# Planning keywords → selects plan.md  
-/gemini:mode:auto "design microservices architecture for user management"
-
-# Error/crash keywords → selects bug-fix.md
-/gemini:mode:auto "API timeout errors in production environment"
-
-# Architecture/design keywords → selects plan.md
-/gemini:mode:auto "implement real-time chat system architecture"
-
-# With directory context
-/gemini:mode:auto "authentication issues" --cd "src/auth"
-```
-
-## Template Selection Logic
-
-### Dynamic Template Discovery
-**Templates auto-discovered from**: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/`
-
-Templates are dynamically read from the directory, including their metadata (name, description, keywords) from the YAML frontmatter.
-
-### Template Metadata Parsing
-
-Each template contains YAML frontmatter with:
-```yaml
----
-name: template-name
-description: Template purpose description
-category: template-category
-keywords: [keyword1, keyword2, keyword3]
----
-```
-
-**Auto-selection based on:**
-- **Template keywords**: Matches user input against template-defined keywords
-- **Template name**: Direct name matching (e.g., "bug-fix" matches bug-related queries)  
-- **Template description**: Semantic matching against description text
-
-## Command Execution
-
-### Step 1: Template Discovery
-```bash
-# Dynamically discover all templates and extract YAML frontmatter
-cd "~/.claude/prompt-templates" && echo "Discovering templates..." && for template_file in *.md; do echo "=== $template_file ==="; head -6 "$template_file" 2>/dev/null || echo "Error reading $template_file"; echo; done
-```
-
-### Step 2: Dynamic Template Analysis & Selection
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION select_template(user_input):
-  templates = list_directory("~/.claude/prompt-templates/")
-  template_metadata = {}
-  
-  # Parse all templates for metadata
-  FOR each template_file in templates:
-    content = read_file(template_file)
-    yaml_front = extract_yaml_frontmatter(content)
-    template_metadata[template_file] = {
-      "name": yaml_front.name,
-      "description": yaml_front.description, 
-      "keywords": yaml_front.keywords || [],
-      "category": yaml_front.category || "general"
-    }
-  
-  input_lower = user_input.toLowerCase()
-  best_match = null
-  highest_score = 0
-  
-  # Score each template against user input
-  FOR each template, metadata in template_metadata:
-    score = 0
-    
-    # Keyword matching (highest weight)
-    FOR each keyword in metadata.keywords:
-      IF input_lower.contains(keyword.toLowerCase()):
-        score += 3
-    
-    # Template name matching
-    IF input_lower.contains(metadata.name.toLowerCase()):
-      score += 2
-    
-    # Description semantic matching  
-    FOR each word in metadata.description.split():
-      IF input_lower.contains(word.toLowerCase()) AND word.length > 3:
-        score += 1
-    
-    IF score > highest_score:
-      highest_score = score
-      best_match = template
-  
-  # Default to first template if no matches
-  RETURN best_match || templates[0]
-END FUNCTION
-```
-
-### Step 3: Execute with Dynamically Selected Template
-```bash
-# Basic execution with selected template
-gemini --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/[selected_template])
-
-User Input: [user_input]"
-
-# With --cd parameter
-cd "[specified_directory]" && gemini --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/[selected_template])
-
-User Input: [user_input]"
-```
-
-**Template selection is completely dynamic** - any new templates added to the directory will be automatically discovered and available for selection based on their YAML frontmatter.
-
-
-### Manual Template Override
-```bash
-# Force specific template
-/gemini:mode:auto "user authentication" --template bug-fix.md
-/gemini:mode:auto "fix login issues" --template plan.md
-```
-
-### Dynamic Template Listing
-```bash
-# List all dynamically discovered templates
-/gemini:mode:auto --list-templates
-# Output:
-# Dynamically discovered templates in ~/.claude/prompt-templates/:
-# - bug-fix.md (用于定位bug并提供修改建议) [Keywords: 规划, bug, 修改方案]
-# - plan.md (软件架构规划和技术实现计划分析模板) [Keywords: 规划, 架构, 实现计划, 技术设计, 修改方案]
-# - [any-new-template].md (Auto-discovered description) [Keywords: auto-parsed]
-```
-
-**Complete template discovery** - new templates are automatically detected and their metadata parsed from YAML frontmatter.
-
-## Auto-Selection Examples
-
-### Dynamic Selection Examples
-```bash
-# Selection based on template keywords and metadata
-"login system crashes on startup" → Matches template with keywords: [bug, 修改方案]
-"design user dashboard with analytics" → Matches template with keywords: [规划, 架构, 技术设计]  
-"database timeout errors in production" → Matches template with keywords: [bug, 修改方案]
-"implement real-time notification system" → Matches template with keywords: [规划, 实现计划, 技术设计]
-
-# Any new templates added will be automatically matched
-"[user input]" → Dynamically matches against all template keywords and descriptions
-```
-
-
-## Session Integration
-
-saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/auto-[template]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Session includes:**
-- Original user input
-- Template selection reasoning
-- Template used
-- Complete analysis results
-
-This command streamlines template usage by automatically detecting user intent and selecting the optimal template for analysis.

.claude/commands/gemini/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bug-index
-description: Bug analysis and fix suggestions using specialized template
-usage: /gemini:mode:bug-index "bug description"
-argument-hint: "description of the bug or error you're experiencing"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error in login flow"
-  - /gemini:mode:bug-index "React component not re-rendering after state change"
-  - /gemini:mode:bug-index "database connection timeout in production"
-allowed-tools: Bash(gemini:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Bug Analysis Command (/gemini:mode:bug-index)
-
-## Overview
-Systematic bug analysis and fix suggestions using expert diagnostic template.
-
-**Directory Analysis Rule**: Intelligent detection of directory context intent - automatically navigate to target directory when analysis scope is directory-specific.
-
-**--cd Parameter Rule**: When `--cd` parameter is provided, always execute `cd "[path]" && gemini --all-files -p "prompt"` to ensure analysis occurs in the specified directory context.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Bug Analysis
-```bash
-/gemini:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error"
-```
-
-### Bug Analysis with Directory Context
-```bash
-/gemini:mode:bug-index "authentication error" --cd "src/auth"
-```
-
-
-### Save to Workflow Session
-```bash
-/gemini:mode:bug-index "API timeout issues" --save-session
-```
-
-## Command Execution
-
-**Template Used**: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
-
-**Executes**:
-```bash
-# Basic usage
-gemini --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md)
-
-Bug Description: [user_description]"
-
-# With --cd parameter
-cd "[specified_directory]" && gemini --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md)
-
-Bug Description: [user_description]"
-```
-
-## Analysis Focus
-
-The bug-fix template provides:
-- **Root Cause Analysis**: Systematic investigation
-- **Code Path Tracing**: Following execution flow  
-- **Targeted Solutions**: Specific, minimal fixes
-- **Impact Assessment**: Understanding side effects
-
-
-## Session Output
-
-saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Includes:**
-- Bug description
-- Template used  
-- Analysis results
-- Recommended actions

.claude/commands/gemini/mode/plan-precise.md

@@ -1,140 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan-precise
-description: Precise path planning analysis for complex projects
-usage: /gemini:mode:plan-precise "planning topic"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:mode:plan-precise "design authentication system"
-  - /gemini:mode:plan-precise "refactor database layer architecture"
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/gemini:mode:plan-precise`
-
-Precise path-based planning analysis using user-specified directories instead of --all-files.
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```pseudo
-# Precise path planning with user-specified scope
-
-PLANNING_TOPIC = user_argument
-PATHS_FILE = "./planning-paths.txt"
-
-# Step 1: Check paths file exists
-IF not file_exists(PATHS_FILE):
-    Write(PATHS_FILE, template_content)
-    echo "📝 Created planning-paths.txt in project root"
-    echo "Please edit file and add paths to analyze"
-    # USER_INPUT: User edits planning-paths.txt and presses Enter
-    wait_for_user_input()
-ELSE:
-    echo "📁 Using existing planning-paths.txt"
-    echo "Current paths preview:"
-    Bash(grep -v '^#' "$PATHS_FILE" | grep -v '^$' | head -5)
-    # USER_INPUT: User confirms y/n
-    user_confirm = prompt("Continue with these paths? (y/n): ")
-    IF user_confirm != "y":
-        echo "Please edit planning-paths.txt and retry"
-        exit
-
-# Step 2: Read and validate paths
-paths_ref = Bash(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh "$PATHS_FILE")
-
-IF paths_ref is empty:
-    echo "❌ No valid paths found in planning-paths.txt"
-    echo "Please add at least one path and retry"
-    exit
-
-echo "🎯 Analysis paths: $paths_ref"
-echo "📋 Planning topic: $PLANNING_TOPIC"
-
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After bash script prepares paths, model takes control to:
-
-1. **Present Configuration**: Show user the detected paths and analysis scope
-2. **Request Confirmation**: Wait for explicit user approval  
-3. **Execute Analysis**: Run gemini with precise path references
-
-### 📋 Execution Flow
-
-```pseudo
-# Step 1: Present plan to user
-PRESENT_PLAN:
-  📋 Precise Path Planning Configuration:
-  
-  Topic: design authentication system
-  Paths: src/auth/**/* src/middleware/auth* tests/auth/**/* config/auth.json
-  Gemini Reference: $(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh ./planning-paths.txt)
-  
-  ⚠️ Continue with analysis? (y/n)
-
-# Step 2: MANDATORY user confirmation  
-IF user_confirms():
-    # Step 3: Execute gemini analysis
-    Bash(gemini -p "$(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh ./planning-paths.txt) @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-
-Planning Topic: $PLANNING_TOPIC")
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-    echo "Edit planning-paths.txt and retry"
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Root Level Config**: `./planning-paths.txt` in project root (no subdirectories)
-- **Simple Workflow**: Check file → Present plan → Confirm → Execute  
-- **Path Focused**: Only analyzes user-specified paths, not entire project
-- **No Complexity**: No validation, suggestions, or result saving - just core function
-- **Template Creation**: Auto-creates template file if missing
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Create analysis for authentication system
-/gemini:mode:plan-precise "design authentication system"
-
-# System creates planning-paths.txt (if needed)
-# User edits: src/auth/**/* tests/auth/**/* config/auth.json  
-# System confirms paths and executes analysis
-```
-
-### 🔍 Complete Execution Example
-
-```bash
-# 1. Command execution
-$ /gemini:mode:plan-precise "design authentication system"
-
-# 2. System output
-📋 Precise Path Planning Configuration:
-
-Topic: design authentication system
-Paths: src/auth/**/* src/middleware/auth* tests/auth/**/* config/auth.json
-Gemini Reference: @{src/auth/**/*,src/middleware/auth*,tests/auth/**/*,config/auth.json}
-
-⚠️ Continue with analysis? (y/n)
-
-# 3. User confirms
-$ y
-
-# 4. Actual gemini command executed
-$ gemini -p "$(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh ./planning-paths.txt) @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-
-Planning Topic: design authentication system"
-```
-
-### 🔧 Path File Format
-
-Simple text file in project root: `./planning-paths.txt`
-
-```
-# Comments start with #
-src/auth/**/*
-src/middleware/auth*  
-tests/auth/**/*
-config/auth.json
-docs/auth/*.md
-```
-

.claude/commands/gemini/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan
-description: Project planning and architecture analysis using Gemini CLI with specialized template
-usage: /gemini:mode:plan "planning topic"
-argument-hint: "planning topic or architectural challenge to analyze"
-examples:
-  - /gemini:mode:plan "design user dashboard feature architecture"
-  - /gemini:mode:plan "plan microservices migration strategy"
-  - /gemini:mode:plan "implement real-time notification system"
-allowed-tools: Bash(gemini:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Planning Analysis Command (/gemini:mode:plan)
-
-## Overview
-**This command uses Gemini CLI for comprehensive project planning and architecture analysis.** It leverages Gemini CLI's powerful codebase analysis capabilities combined with expert planning templates to provide strategic insights and implementation roadmaps.
-
-### Key Features
-- **Gemini CLI Integration**: Utilizes Gemini CLI's deep codebase analysis for informed planning decisions
-
-**--cd Parameter Rule**: When `--cd` parameter is provided, always execute `cd "[path]" && gemini --all-files -p "prompt"` to ensure analysis occurs in the specified directory context.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Usage
-```bash
-/gemini:mode:plan "design authentication system"
-```
-
-### Directory-Specific Analysis
-```bash
-/gemini:mode:plan "design authentication system" --cd "src/auth"
-```
-
-## Command Execution
-
-**Smart Directory Detection**: Auto-detects relevant directories based on topic keywords 
-
-**Executes**:
-```bash
-# Project-wide analysis
-gemini --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-Planning Topic: [user_description]"
-
-# Directory-specific analysis  
-cd "[directory]" && gemini --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-Planning Topic: [user_description]"
-```
-
-
-## Session Output
-
-saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Includes:**
-- Planning topic
-- Template used
-- Analysis results  
-- Implementation roadmap
-- Key decisions

.claude/commands/qwen/analyze.md

@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
----
-name: analyze
-description: Quick analysis of codebase patterns, architecture, and code quality using qwen CLI
-usage: /qwen:analyze <analysis-type>
-argument-hint: "analysis target or type"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:analyze "React hooks patterns"
-  - /qwen:analyze "authentication security"
-  - /qwen:analyze "performance bottlenecks"
-  - /qwen:analyze "API design patterns"
-model: haiku
----
-
-# qwen Analysis Command (/qwen:analyze)
-
-## Overview
-Quick analysis tool for codebase insights using intelligent pattern detection and template-driven analysis.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-## Analysis Types
-
-| Type | Purpose | Example |
-|------|---------|---------|
-| **pattern** | Code pattern detection | "React hooks usage patterns" |
-| **architecture** | System structure analysis | "component hierarchy structure" |
-| **security** | Security vulnerabilities | "authentication vulnerabilities" |
-| **performance** | Performance bottlenecks | "rendering performance issues" |
-| **quality** | Code quality assessment | "testing coverage analysis" |
-| **dependencies** | Third-party analysis | "outdated package dependencies" |
-
-## Quick Usage
-
-### Basic Analysis
-```bash
-/qwen:analyze "authentication patterns"
-```
-**Executes**: `qwen -p -a "@{**/*auth*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(template:analysis/pattern.txt)"`
-
-### Targeted Analysis
-```bash
-/qwen:analyze "React component architecture"
-```
-**Executes**: `qwen -p -a "@{src/components/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(template:analysis/architecture.txt)"`
-
-### Security Focus
-```bash
-/qwen:analyze "API security vulnerabilities"
-```
-**Executes**: `qwen -p -a "@{**/api/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} $(template:analysis/security.txt)"`
-
-## Templates Used
-
-Templates are automatically selected based on analysis type:
-- **Pattern Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt`
-- **Architecture Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt`
-- **Security Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/security.txt`
-- **Performance Analysis**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/performance.txt`
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-⚠️ **Session Check**: Automatically detects active workflow session via `.workflow/.active-*` marker file.
-
-**Analysis results saved to:**
-- Active session: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/analysis-[timestamp].md`
-- No session: Temporary analysis output
-
-## Common Patterns
-
-### Technology Stack Analysis
-```bash
-/qwen:analyze "project technology stack"
-# Auto-detects: package.json, config files, dependencies
-```
-
-### Code Quality Review
-```bash
-/qwen:analyze "code quality and standards"
-# Auto-targets: source files, test files, CLAUDE.md
-```
-
-### Migration Planning
-```bash
-/qwen:analyze "legacy code modernization"
-# Focuses: older patterns, deprecated APIs, upgrade paths
-```
-
-## Output Format
-
-Analysis results include:
-- **File References**: Specific file:line locations
-- **Code Examples**: Relevant code snippets
-- **Patterns Found**: Common patterns and anti-patterns
-- **Recommendations**: Actionable improvements
-- **Integration Points**: How components connect
-

.claude/commands/qwen/chat.md

@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
----
-name: chat
-
-description: Simple qwen CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
-usage: /qwen:chat "inquiry"
-argument-hint: "your question or analysis request"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-  - /qwen:chat "how can I optimize this React component performance?"
-  - /qwen:chat "review security vulnerabilities in src/auth/"
-allowed-tools: Bash(qwen:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/qwen:chat`**
-
--   **Type**: Basic qwen CLI Wrapper
--   **Purpose**: Direct interaction with the `qwen` CLI for simple codebase analysis
--   **Core Tool**: `Bash(qwen:*)` - Executes the external qwen CLI tool
-
-### 📥 **Parameters & Usage**
-
--   **`<inquiry>` (Required)**: Your question or analysis request
--   **`--all-files` (Optional)**: Includes the entire codebase in the analysis context
--   **`--save-session` (Optional)**: Saves the interaction to current workflow session directory
--   **File References**: Specify files or patterns using `@{path/to/file}` syntax
-
-### 🔄 **Execution Workflow**
-
-`Parse Input` **->** `Assemble Context` **->** `Construct Prompt` **->** `Execute qwen CLI` **->** `(Optional) Save Session`
-
-### 📚 **Context Assembly**
-
-Context is gathered from:
-1. **Project Guidelines**: Always includes `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-2. **User-Explicit Files**: Files specified by the user (e.g., `@{src/auth/*.js}`)
-3. **All Files Flag**: The `--all-files` flag includes the entire codebase
-
-### 📝 **Prompt Format**
-
-```
-=== CONTEXT ===
-@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [Project guidelines]
-@{target_files} [User-specified files or all files if --all-files is used]
-
-=== USER INPUT ===
-[The user inquiry text]
-```
-
-### ⚙️ **Execution Implementation**
-
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION execute_qwen_chat(user_inquiry, flags):
-  // Construct basic prompt
-  prompt = "=== CONTEXT ===\n"
-  prompt += "@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}\n"
-  
-  // Add user-specified files or all files
-  IF flags contain "--all-files":
-    result = execute_tool("Bash(qwen:*)", "--all-files", "-p", prompt + user_inquiry)
-  ELSE:
-    prompt += "\n=== USER INPUT ===\n" + user_inquiry
-    result = execute_tool("Bash(qwen:*)", "-p", prompt)
-  
-  // Save session if requested
-  IF flags contain "--save-session":
-    save_chat_session(user_inquiry, result)
-  
-  RETURN result
-END FUNCTION
-```
-
-### 💾 **Session Persistence**
-
-When `--save-session` flag is used:
--   Check for existing active session (`.workflow/.active-*` markers)
--   Save to existing session's `.chat/` directory or create new session
--   File format: `chat-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.md`
--   Include query, context, and response in saved file
-
-**Session Template:**
-```markdown
-# Chat Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Query
-[Original user inquiry]
-
-## Context
-[Files and patterns included in analysis]
-
-## qwen Response
-[Complete response from qwen CLI]
-```

.claude/commands/qwen/execute.md

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
----
-name: execute
-description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference
-usage: /qwen:execute <description|task-id>
-argument-hint: "implementation description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:execute "implement user authentication system" 
-  - /qwen:execute "optimize React component performance"
-  - /qwen:execute IMPL-001 
-  - /qwen:execute "fix API performance issues"
-allowed-tools: Bash(qwen:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# qwen Execute Command (/qwen:execute)
-
-## Overview
-
-**⚡ YOLO-enabled execution**: Auto-approves all confirmations for streamlined implementation workflow.
-
-**Purpose**: Execute implementation tasks using intelligent context inference and qwen CLI with full permissions.
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-## 🚨 YOLO Permissions
-
-**All confirmations auto-approved by default:**
-- ✅ File pattern inference confirmation
-- ✅ qwen execution confirmation  
-- ✅ File modification confirmation
-- ✅ Implementation summary generation
-
-## Execution Modes
-
-### 1. Description Mode
-**Input**: Natural language description
-```bash
-/qwen:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-```
-**Process**: Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Context collection → Execution
-
-### 2. Task ID Mode  
-**Input**: Workflow task identifier
-```bash
-/qwen:execute IMPL-001
-```
-**Process**: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Context integration → Execution
-
-## Context Inference Logic
-
-**Auto-selects relevant files based on:**
-- **Keywords**: "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- **Technology**: "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
-- **Task Type**: "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- **Always includes**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-
-## Command Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--debug` | Verbose execution logging |
-| `--save-session` | Save complete execution session to workflow |
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-### Session Management
-⚠️ **Auto-detects active session**: Checks `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
-
-**Session storage:**
-- **Active session exists**: Saves to `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session**: Creates new session directory
-
-### Task Integration
-```bash
-# Execute specific workflow task
-/qwen:execute IMPL-001
-
-# Loads from: .task/IMPL-001.json
-# Uses: task context, brainstorming refs, scope definitions
-# Updates: workflow status, generates summary
-```
-
-## Execution Templates
-
-### User Description Template
-```bash
-qwen --all-files -p "@{inferred_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Implementation Task: [user_description]
-
-Provide:
-- Specific implementation code
-- File modification locations (file:line)
-- Test cases
-- Integration guidance"
-```
-
-### Task ID Template
-```bash
-qwen --all-files -p "@{task_files} @{brainstorming_refs} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-
-Task: [task_title] (ID: [task-id])
-Type: [task_type]
-Scope: [task_scope]
-
-Execute implementation following task acceptance criteria."
-```
-
-## Auto-Generated Outputs
-
-### 1. Implementation Summary
-**Location**: `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` or auto-generated ID
-
-```markdown
-# Task Summary: [Task-ID] [Description]
-
-## Implementation
-- **Files Modified**: [file:line references]
-- **Features Added**: [specific functionality]
-- **Context Used**: [inferred patterns]
-
-## Integration
-- [Links to workflow documents]
-```
-
-### 2. Execution Session
-**Location**: `.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-
-```markdown
-# Execution Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Input
-[User description or Task ID]
-
-## Context Inference
-[File patterns used with rationale]
-
-## Implementation Results
-[Generated code and modifications]
-
-## Status Updates
-[Workflow integration updates]
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Task ID not found**: Lists available tasks
-- **Pattern inference failure**: Uses generic `src/**/*` pattern
-- **Execution failure**: Attempts fallback with simplified context
-- **File modification errors**: Reports specific file/permission issues
-
-## Performance Features
-
-- **Smart caching**: Frequently used pattern mappings
-- **Progressive inference**: Precise → broad pattern fallback
-- **Parallel execution**: When multiple contexts needed
-- **Directory optimization**: Switches to optimal execution path
-
-## Integration Workflow
-
-**Typical sequence:**
-1. `workflow:plan` → Creates tasks
-2. `/qwen:execute IMPL-001` → Executes with YOLO permissions
-3. Auto-updates workflow status and generates summaries
-4. `workflow:review` → Final validation
-
-**vs. `/qwen:analyze`**: Execute performs analysis **and implementation**, analyze is read-only.
-

.claude/commands/qwen/mode/auto.md

@@ -1,188 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto
-description: Auto-select and execute appropriate template based on user input analysis
-usage: /qwen:mode:auto "description of task or problem"
-argument-hint: "description of what you want to analyze or plan"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:mode:auto "authentication system keeps crashing during login"
-  - /qwen:mode:auto "design a real-time notification architecture"
-  - /qwen:mode:auto "database connection errors in production"
-  - /qwen:mode:auto "plan user dashboard with analytics features"
-allowed-tools: Bash(ls:*), Bash(qwen:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Auto Template Selection (/qwen:mode:auto)
-
-## Overview
-Automatically analyzes user input to select the most appropriate template and execute qwen CLI with optimal context.
-
-**Directory Analysis Rule**: Intelligent detection of directory context intent - automatically navigate to target directory when analysis scope is directory-specific.
-
-**--cd Parameter Rule**: When `--cd` parameter is provided, always execute `cd "[path]" && qwen --all-files -p "prompt"` to ensure analysis occurs in the specified directory context.
-
-**Process**: List Templates → Analyze Input → Select Template → Execute with Context
-
-## Usage
-
-### Auto-Detection Examples
-```bash
-# Bug-related keywords → selects bug-fix.md
-/qwen:mode:auto "React component not rendering after state update"
-
-# Planning keywords → selects plan.md  
-/qwen:mode:auto "design microservices architecture for user management"
-
-# Error/crash keywords → selects bug-fix.md
-/qwen:mode:auto "API timeout errors in production environment"
-
-# Architecture/design keywords → selects plan.md
-/qwen:mode:auto "implement real-time chat system architecture"
-
-# With directory context
-/qwen:mode:auto "authentication issues" --cd "src/auth"
-```
-
-## Template Selection Logic
-
-### Dynamic Template Discovery
-**Templates auto-discovered from**: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/`
-
-Templates are dynamically read from the directory, including their metadata (name, description, keywords) from the YAML frontmatter.
-
-### Template Metadata Parsing
-
-Each template contains YAML frontmatter with:
-```yaml
----
-name: template-name
-description: Template purpose description
-category: template-category
-keywords: [keyword1, keyword2, keyword3]
----
-```
-
-**Auto-selection based on:**
-- **Template keywords**: Matches user input against template-defined keywords
-- **Template name**: Direct name matching (e.g., "bug-fix" matches bug-related queries)  
-- **Template description**: Semantic matching against description text
-
-## Command Execution
-
-### Step 1: Template Discovery
-```bash
-# Dynamically discover all templates and extract YAML frontmatter
-cd "~/.claude/prompt-templates" && echo "Discovering templates..." && for template_file in *.md; do echo "=== $template_file ==="; head -6 "$template_file" 2>/dev/null || echo "Error reading $template_file"; echo; done
-```
-
-### Step 2: Dynamic Template Analysis & Selection
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION select_template(user_input):
-  templates = list_directory("~/.claude/prompt-templates/")
-  template_metadata = {}
-  
-  # Parse all templates for metadata
-  FOR each template_file in templates:
-    content = read_file(template_file)
-    yaml_front = extract_yaml_frontmatter(content)
-    template_metadata[template_file] = {
-      "name": yaml_front.name,
-      "description": yaml_front.description, 
-      "keywords": yaml_front.keywords || [],
-      "category": yaml_front.category || "general"
-    }
-  
-  input_lower = user_input.toLowerCase()
-  best_match = null
-  highest_score = 0
-  
-  # Score each template against user input
-  FOR each template, metadata in template_metadata:
-    score = 0
-    
-    # Keyword matching (highest weight)
-    FOR each keyword in metadata.keywords:
-      IF input_lower.contains(keyword.toLowerCase()):
-        score += 3
-    
-    # Template name matching
-    IF input_lower.contains(metadata.name.toLowerCase()):
-      score += 2
-    
-    # Description semantic matching  
-    FOR each word in metadata.description.split():
-      IF input_lower.contains(word.toLowerCase()) AND word.length > 3:
-        score += 1
-    
-    IF score > highest_score:
-      highest_score = score
-      best_match = template
-  
-  # Default to first template if no matches
-  RETURN best_match || templates[0]
-END FUNCTION
-```
-
-### Step 3: Execute with Dynamically Selected Template
-```bash
-# Basic execution with selected template
-qwen --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/[selected_template])
-
-User Input: [user_input]"
-
-# With --cd parameter
-cd "[specified_directory]" && qwen --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/[selected_template])
-
-User Input: [user_input]"
-```
-
-**Template selection is completely dynamic** - any new templates added to the directory will be automatically discovered and available for selection based on their YAML frontmatter.
-
-
-### Manual Template Override
-```bash
-# Force specific template
-/qwen:mode:auto "user authentication" --template bug-fix.md
-/qwen:mode:auto "fix login issues" --template plan.md
-```
-
-### Dynamic Template Listing
-```bash
-# List all dynamically discovered templates
-/qwen:mode:auto --list-templates
-# Output:
-# Dynamically discovered templates in ~/.claude/prompt-templates/:
-# - bug-fix.md (用于定位bug并提供修改建议) [Keywords: 规划, bug, 修改方案]
-# - plan.md (软件架构规划和技术实现计划分析模板) [Keywords: 规划, 架构, 实现计划, 技术设计, 修改方案]
-# - [any-new-template].md (Auto-discovered description) [Keywords: auto-parsed]
-```
-
-**Complete template discovery** - new templates are automatically detected and their metadata parsed from YAML frontmatter.
-
-## Auto-Selection Examples
-
-### Dynamic Selection Examples
-```bash
-# Selection based on template keywords and metadata
-"login system crashes on startup" → Matches template with keywords: [bug, 修改方案]
-"design user dashboard with analytics" → Matches template with keywords: [规划, 架构, 技术设计]  
-"database timeout errors in production" → Matches template with keywords: [bug, 修改方案]
-"implement real-time notification system" → Matches template with keywords: [规划, 实现计划, 技术设计]
-
-# Any new templates added will be automatically matched
-"[user input]" → Dynamically matches against all template keywords and descriptions
-```
-
-
-## Session Integration
-
-saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/auto-[template]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Session includes:**
-- Original user input
-- Template selection reasoning
-- Template used
-- Complete analysis results
-
-This command streamlines template usage by automatically detecting user intent and selecting the optimal template for analysis.

.claude/commands/qwen/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bug-index
-description: Bug analysis and fix suggestions using specialized template
-usage: /qwen:mode:bug-index "bug description"
-argument-hint: "description of the bug or error you're experiencing"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error in login flow"
-  - /qwen:mode:bug-index "React component not re-rendering after state change"
-  - /qwen:mode:bug-index "database connection timeout in production"
-allowed-tools: Bash(qwen:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Bug Analysis Command (/qwen:mode:bug-index)
-
-## Overview
-Systematic bug analysis and fix suggestions using expert diagnostic template.
-
-**Directory Analysis Rule**: Intelligent detection of directory context intent - automatically navigate to target directory when analysis scope is directory-specific.
-
-**--cd Parameter Rule**: When `--cd` parameter is provided, always execute `cd "[path]" && qwen --all-files -p "prompt"` to ensure analysis occurs in the specified directory context.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Bug Analysis
-```bash
-/qwen:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error"
-```
-
-### Bug Analysis with Directory Context
-```bash
-/qwen:mode:bug-index "authentication error" --cd "src/auth"
-```
-
-
-### Save to Workflow Session
-```bash
-/qwen:mode:bug-index "API timeout issues" --save-session
-```
-
-## Command Execution
-
-**Template Used**: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
-
-**Executes**:
-```bash
-# Basic usage
-qwen --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md)
-
-Bug Description: [user_description]"
-
-# With --cd parameter
-cd "[specified_directory]" && qwen --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md)
-
-Bug Description: [user_description]"
-```
-
-## Analysis Focus
-
-The bug-fix template provides:
-- **Root Cause Analysis**: Systematic investigation
-- **Code Path Tracing**: Following execution flow  
-- **Targeted Solutions**: Specific, minimal fixes
-- **Impact Assessment**: Understanding side effects
-
-
-## Session Output
-
-saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Includes:**
-- Bug description
-- Template used  
-- Analysis results
-- Recommended actions

.claude/commands/qwen/mode/plan-precise.md

@@ -1,140 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan-precise
-description: Precise path planning analysis for complex projects
-usage: /qwen:mode:plan-precise "planning topic"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:mode:plan-precise "design authentication system"
-  - /qwen:mode:plan-precise "refactor database layer architecture"
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/qwen:mode:plan-precise`
-
-Precise path-based planning analysis using user-specified directories instead of --all-files.
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```pseudo
-# Precise path planning with user-specified scope
-
-PLANNING_TOPIC = user_argument
-PATHS_FILE = "./planning-paths.txt"
-
-# Step 1: Check paths file exists
-IF not file_exists(PATHS_FILE):
-    Write(PATHS_FILE, template_content)
-    echo "📝 Created planning-paths.txt in project root"
-    echo "Please edit file and add paths to analyze"
-    # USER_INPUT: User edits planning-paths.txt and presses Enter
-    wait_for_user_input()
-ELSE:
-    echo "📁 Using existing planning-paths.txt"
-    echo "Current paths preview:"
-    Bash(grep -v '^#' "$PATHS_FILE" | grep -v '^$' | head -5)
-    # USER_INPUT: User confirms y/n
-    user_confirm = prompt("Continue with these paths? (y/n): ")
-    IF user_confirm != "y":
-        echo "Please edit planning-paths.txt and retry"
-        exit
-
-# Step 2: Read and validate paths
-paths_ref = Bash(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh "$PATHS_FILE")
-
-IF paths_ref is empty:
-    echo "❌ No valid paths found in planning-paths.txt"
-    echo "Please add at least one path and retry"
-    exit
-
-echo "🎯 Analysis paths: $paths_ref"
-echo "📋 Planning topic: $PLANNING_TOPIC"
-
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After bash script prepares paths, model takes control to:
-
-1. **Present Configuration**: Show user the detected paths and analysis scope
-2. **Request Confirmation**: Wait for explicit user approval  
-3. **Execute Analysis**: Run qwen with precise path references
-
-### 📋 Execution Flow
-
-```pseudo
-# Step 1: Present plan to user
-PRESENT_PLAN:
-  📋 Precise Path Planning Configuration:
-  
-  Topic: design authentication system
-  Paths: src/auth/**/* src/middleware/auth* tests/auth/**/* config/auth.json
-  qwen Reference: $(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh ./planning-paths.txt)
-  
-  ⚠️ Continue with analysis? (y/n)
-
-# Step 2: MANDATORY user confirmation  
-IF user_confirms():
-    # Step 3: Execute qwen analysis
-    Bash(qwen -p "$(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh ./planning-paths.txt) @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-
-Planning Topic: $PLANNING_TOPIC")
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-    echo "Edit planning-paths.txt and retry"
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Root Level Config**: `./planning-paths.txt` in project root (no subdirectories)
-- **Simple Workflow**: Check file → Present plan → Confirm → Execute  
-- **Path Focused**: Only analyzes user-specified paths, not entire project
-- **No Complexity**: No validation, suggestions, or result saving - just core function
-- **Template Creation**: Auto-creates template file if missing
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Create analysis for authentication system
-/qwen:mode:plan-precise "design authentication system"
-
-# System creates planning-paths.txt (if needed)
-# User edits: src/auth/**/* tests/auth/**/* config/auth.json  
-# System confirms paths and executes analysis
-```
-
-### 🔍 Complete Execution Example
-
-```bash
-# 1. Command execution
-$ /qwen:mode:plan-precise "design authentication system"
-
-# 2. System output
-📋 Precise Path Planning Configuration:
-
-Topic: design authentication system
-Paths: src/auth/**/* src/middleware/auth* tests/auth/**/* config/auth.json
-qwen Reference: @{src/auth/**/*,src/middleware/auth*,tests/auth/**/*,config/auth.json}
-
-⚠️ Continue with analysis? (y/n)
-
-# 3. User confirms
-$ y
-
-# 4. Actual qwen command executed
-$ qwen -p "$(.claude/scripts/read-paths.sh ./planning-paths.txt) @{CLAUDE.md} $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-
-Planning Topic: design authentication system"
-```
-
-### 🔧 Path File Format
-
-Simple text file in project root: `./planning-paths.txt`
-
-```
-# Comments start with #
-src/auth/**/*
-src/middleware/auth*  
-tests/auth/**/*
-config/auth.json
-docs/auth/*.md
-```
-

.claude/commands/qwen/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan
-description: Project planning and architecture analysis using qwen CLI with specialized template
-usage: /qwen:mode:plan "planning topic"
-argument-hint: "planning topic or architectural challenge to analyze"
-examples:
-  - /qwen:mode:plan "design user dashboard feature architecture"
-  - /qwen:mode:plan "plan microservices migration strategy"
-  - /qwen:mode:plan "implement real-time notification system"
-allowed-tools: Bash(qwen:*)
-model: sonnet
----
-
-# Planning Analysis Command (/qwen:mode:plan)
-
-## Overview
-**This command uses qwen CLI for comprehensive project planning and architecture analysis.** It leverages qwen CLI's powerful codebase analysis capabilities combined with expert planning templates to provide strategic insights and implementation roadmaps.
-
-### Key Features
-- **qwen CLI Integration**: Utilizes qwen CLI's deep codebase analysis for informed planning decisions
-
-**--cd Parameter Rule**: When `--cd` parameter is provided, always execute `cd "[path]" && qwen --all-files -p "prompt"` to ensure analysis occurs in the specified directory context.
-
-## Usage
-
-### Basic Usage
-```bash
-/qwen:mode:plan "design authentication system"
-```
-
-### Directory-Specific Analysis
-```bash
-/qwen:mode:plan "design authentication system" --cd "src/auth"
-```
-
-## Command Execution
-
-**Smart Directory Detection**: Auto-detects relevant directories based on topic keywords 
-
-**Executes**:
-```bash
-# Project-wide analysis
-qwen --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-Planning Topic: [user_description]"
-
-# Directory-specific analysis  
-cd "[directory]" && qwen --all-files -p "$(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md)
-Planning Topic: [user_description]"
-```
-
-
-## Session Output
-
-saves to:
-`.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Includes:**
-- Planning topic
-- Template used
-- Analysis results  
-- Implementation roadmap
-- Key decisions

.claude/commands/task/breakdown.md

@@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 ### Agent Assignment
 - **Design/Planning** → `@planning-agent`
 - **Implementation** → `@code-developer`
-- **Testing** → `@code-review-test-agent`
-- **Review** → `@review-agent`
+- **Testing** → `@code-developer` (type: "test-gen")
+- **Test Validation** → `@test-fix-agent` (type: "test-fix")
+- **Review** → `@general-purpose` (optional)
 
 ### Context Inheritance
 - Subtasks inherit parent requirements
@@ -161,8 +162,8 @@ See @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md for:
 
 ▸ impl-1: Build authentication (container)
   ├── impl-1.1: Design schema → @planning-agent
-  ├── impl-1.2: Implement logic → @code-developer
-  └── impl-1.3: Write tests → @code-review-test-agent
+  ├── impl-1.2: Implement logic + tests → @code-developer
+  └── impl-1.3: Execute & fix tests → @test-fix-agent
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling

.claude/commands/task/create.md

@@ -107,8 +107,9 @@ Tasks inherit from:
 Based on task type and title keywords:
 - **Build/Implement** → @code-developer
 - **Design/Plan** → @planning-agent
-- **Test/Validate** → @code-review-test-agent
-- **Review/Audit** → @review-agent`
+- **Test Generation** → @code-developer (type: "test-gen")
+- **Test Execution/Fix** → @test-fix-agent (type: "test-fix")
+- **Review/Audit** → @general-purpose (optional, only when explicitly requested)
 
 ## Validation Rules
 

.claude/commands/task/execute.md

@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ examples:
     -   Executes step-by-step, requiring user confirmation at each checkpoint.
     -   Allows for dynamic adjustments and manual review during the process.
 -   **review**
-    -   Executes under the supervision of a `@review-agent`.
-    -   Performs quality checks and provides detailed feedback at each step.
+    -   Optional manual review using `@general-purpose`.
+    -   Used only when explicitly requested by user.
 
 ### 🤖 **Agent Selection Logic**
 
@@ -45,10 +45,12 @@ FUNCTION select_agent(task, agent_override):
                 RETURN "@code-developer"
             WHEN CONTAINS "Design schema", "Plan":
                 RETURN "@planning-agent"
-            WHEN CONTAINS "Write tests":
-                RETURN "@code-review-test-agent"
+            WHEN CONTAINS "Write tests", "Generate tests":
+                RETURN "@code-developer" // type: test-gen
+            WHEN CONTAINS "Execute tests", "Fix tests", "Validate":
+                RETURN "@test-fix-agent" // type: test-fix
             WHEN CONTAINS "Review code":
-                RETURN "@review-agent"
+                RETURN "@general-purpose" // Optional manual review
             DEFAULT:
                 RETURN "@code-developer" // Default agent
         END CASE
@@ -232,13 +234,15 @@ Different agents receive context tailored to their function, including implement
 - Implementation risks and mitigation strategies
 - Architecture implications from implementation.context_notes
 
-**`@code-review-test-agent`**: 
-- Files to test from implementation.files[].path
-- Logic flows to validate from implementation.modifications.logic_flow
-- Error conditions to test from implementation.context_notes.error_handling
-- Performance benchmarks from implementation.context_notes.performance_considerations
+**`@test-fix-agent`**:
+- Test files to execute from task.context.focus_paths
+- Source files to fix from implementation.files[].path
+- Expected behaviors from implementation.modifications.logic_flow
+- Error conditions to validate from implementation.context_notes.error_handling
+- Performance requirements from implementation.context_notes.performance_considerations
 
-**`@review-agent`**: 
+**`@general-purpose`**:
+- Used for optional manual reviews when explicitly requested
 - Code quality standards and implementation patterns
 - Security considerations from implementation.context_notes.risks
 - Dependency validation from implementation.context_notes.dependencies

.claude/commands/update-memory-full.md

@@ -1,40 +1,55 @@
 ---
 name: update-memory-full
 description: Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-usage: /update-memory-full
+usage: /update-memory-full [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
 examples:
-  - /update-memory-full                      # Full project documentation update
+  - /update-memory-full                      # Full project documentation update (gemini default)
+  - /update-memory-full --tool qwen          # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
+  - /update-memory-full --tool codex         # Use Codex for implementation validation
 ---
 
 ### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-full`
 
 Complete project-wide documentation update using depth-parallel execution.
 
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
+- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
+- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
 ### 📝 Execution Template
 
 ```bash
 #!/bin/bash
 # Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
 
-# Step 1: Code Index architecture analysis
+# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+tool="gemini"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
+
+# Step 2: Code Index architecture analysis
 mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
 mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
 
-# Step 2: Cache git changes
+# Step 3: Cache git changes
 Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
 
-# Step 3: Get and display project structure
+# Step 4: Get and display project structure
 modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
 count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
 
-# Step 3: Analysis handover → Model takes control
+# Step 5: Analysis handover → Model takes control
 # BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
 
 # Pseudocode flow:
 # IF (module_count > 20 OR complex_project_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
 # ELSE:
 #     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
+#
+# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
 ```
 
 ### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
@@ -43,9 +58,9 @@ After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to
 
 1. **Analyze Complexity**: Review module count and project context
 2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**: 
+3. **Choose Strategy**:
    - Simple projects: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-gemini-bridge agent
+   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
 4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated
 5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
 
@@ -56,17 +71,19 @@ After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to
 Model will present detailed plan:
 ```
 📋 Update Plan:
+  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
+
   NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
     - ./src/components/CLAUDE.md
     - ./src/services/CLAUDE.md
-  
+
   UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
     - ./CLAUDE.md
     - ./src/CLAUDE.md
     - ./tests/CLAUDE.md
 
   Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed
-  
+
   ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
 ```
 
@@ -84,7 +101,7 @@ depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
 FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
     FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
         WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" &)
+        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" "$tool" &)
     wait_all_jobs()
 
 # Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
@@ -102,13 +119,43 @@ Bash(git status --short)
 ```
 
 **For Complex Projects (>20 modules):**
-The model will delegate to the memory-gemini-bridge agent using the Task tool:
-```
+
+The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
+
+```javascript
 Task "Complex project full update"
-prompt: "Execute full documentation update for [count] modules using depth-parallel execution"
-subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
+prompt: `
+CONTEXT:
+- Total modules: ${module_count}
+- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
+- Mode: full
+- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
+- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
+
+MODULE LIST:
+${modules_output}  // Full output from get_modules_by_depth.sh list
+
+REQUIREMENTS:
+1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
+2. Process depths 5→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel jobs per depth
+3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "full" "${tool}" &
+4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
+5. Verify all ${module_count} modules are processed
+6. Run safety check after completion
+7. Display git status
+
+Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules.
+`
 ```
 
+**Agent receives complete context:**
+- Module count and tool selection
+- Full structured module list
+- Clear execution requirements
+- Path extraction format
+- Success criteria
+
 
 ### 📚 Usage Examples
 

.claude/commands/update-memory-related.md

@@ -1,15 +1,23 @@
 ---
 name: update-memory-related
 description: Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation updates based on recent changes
-usage: /update-memory-related
+usage: /update-memory-related [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
 examples:
-  - /update-memory-related                    # Update documentation based on recent changes
+  - /update-memory-related                    # Update documentation based on recent changes (gemini default)
+  - /update-memory-related --tool qwen        # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
+  - /update-memory-related --tool codex       # Use Codex for implementation validation
 ---
 
 ### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-related`
 
 Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
 
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
+- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
+- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
 
 ### 📝 Execution Template
 
@@ -17,30 +25,37 @@ Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
 #!/bin/bash
 # Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation update
 
-# Step 1: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
+# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+tool="gemini"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
+
+# Step 2: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
 mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
 mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
 
-# Step 2: Detect changed modules (before staging)
+# Step 3: Detect changed modules (before staging)
 changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list))
 
-# Step 3: Cache git changes (protect current state)
+# Step 4: Cache git changes (protect current state)
 Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
 
-# Step 3: Use detected changes or fallback
+# Step 5: Use detected changes or fallback
 if [ -z "$changed" ]; then
     changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | head -10))
 fi
 count=$(echo "$changed" | wc -l)
 
-# Step 4: Analysis handover → Model takes control  
+# Step 6: Analysis handover → Model takes control
 # BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
 
 # Pseudocode flow:
 # IF (change_count > 15 OR complex_changes_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
 # ELSE:
 #     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
+#
+# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
 ```
 
 ### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
@@ -51,7 +66,7 @@ After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
 2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which changed modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
 3. **Choose Strategy**: 
    - Simple changes: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-gemini-bridge agent
+   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
 4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated for changed modules
 5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
 
@@ -62,18 +77,20 @@ After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
 Model will present detailed plan for affected modules:
 ```
 📋 Related Update Plan:
+  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
+
   CHANGED modules affecting CLAUDE.md:
-  
+
   NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
     - ./src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
     - ./src/utils/helpers/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-  
+
   UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
     - ./src/api/CLAUDE.md  [parent of changed auth/]
     - ./src/CLAUDE.md  [root level]
 
   Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed for recent changes
-  
+
   ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
 ```
 
@@ -91,7 +108,7 @@ depth_modules = organize_by_depth(changed_modules)
 FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
     FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
         WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" &)
+        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" "$tool" &)
     wait_all_jobs()
 
 # Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
@@ -109,13 +126,44 @@ Bash(git diff --stat)
 ```
 
 **For Complex Changes (>15 modules):**
-The model will delegate to the memory-gemini-bridge agent using the Task tool:
-```
+
+The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
+
+```javascript
 Task "Complex project related update"
-prompt: "Execute context-aware update for [count] changed modules using depth-parallel execution"
-subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
+prompt: `
+CONTEXT:
+- Total modules: ${change_count}
+- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
+- Mode: related
+- Changed modules detected via: detect_changed_modules.sh
+- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
+- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
+
+MODULE LIST:
+${changed_modules_output}  // Full output from detect_changed_modules.sh list
+
+REQUIREMENTS:
+1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
+2. Process depths sequentially (deepest→shallowest), max 4 parallel jobs per depth
+3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "related" "${tool}" &
+4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
+5. Verify all ${change_count} modules are processed
+6. Run safety check after completion
+7. Display git diff --stat
+
+Execute depth-parallel updates for changed modules only.
+`
 ```
 
+**Agent receives complete context:**
+- Changed module count and tool selection
+- Full structured module list (changed only)
+- Clear execution requirements with "related" mode
+- Path extraction format
+- Success criteria
+
 
 ### 📚 Usage Examples
 

.claude/commands/version.md

@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+---
+name: version
+description: Display version information and check for updates
+usage: /version
+examples:
+  - /version
+allowed-tools: Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Version Command (/version)
+
+## Purpose
+Display local and global installation versions, check for the latest updates from GitHub, and provide upgrade recommendations.
+
+## Execution Flow
+1. **Local Version Check**: Read version information from `./.claude/version.json` if it exists.
+2. **Global Version Check**: Read version information from `~/.claude/version.json` if it exists.
+3. **Fetch Remote Versions**: Use GitHub API to get the latest stable release tag and the latest commit hash from the main branch.
+4. **Compare & Suggest**: Compare installed versions with the latest remote versions and provide upgrade suggestions if applicable.
+
+## Step 1: Check Local Version
+
+### Check if local version.json exists
+```bash
+bash(test -f ./.claude/version.json && echo "found" || echo "not_found")
+```
+
+### Read local version (if exists)
+```bash
+bash(cat ./.claude/version.json)
+```
+
+### Extract version with jq (preferred)
+```bash
+bash(cat ./.claude/version.json | grep -o '"version": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+```
+
+### Extract installation date
+```bash
+bash(cat ./.claude/version.json | grep -o '"installation_date_utc": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+```
+
+**Output Format**:
+```
+Local Version: 3.2.1
+Installed: 2025-10-03T12:00:00Z
+```
+
+## Step 2: Check Global Version
+
+### Check if global version.json exists
+```bash
+bash(test -f ~/.claude/version.json && echo "found" || echo "not_found")
+```
+
+### Read global version
+```bash
+bash(cat ~/.claude/version.json)
+```
+
+### Extract version
+```bash
+bash(cat ~/.claude/version.json | grep -o '"version": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+```
+
+### Extract installation date
+```bash
+bash(cat ~/.claude/version.json | grep -o '"installation_date_utc": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+```
+
+**Output Format**:
+```
+Global Version: 3.2.1
+Installed: 2025-10-03T12:00:00Z
+```
+
+## Step 3: Fetch Latest Stable Release
+
+### Call GitHub API for latest release (with timeout)
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+### Extract tag name (version)
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"tag_name": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+### Extract release name
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"name": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+### Extract published date
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"published_at": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+**Output Format**:
+```
+Latest Stable: v3.2.2
+Release: v3.2.2: Independent Test-Gen Workflow with Cross-Session Context
+Published: 2025-10-03T04:10:08Z
+```
+
+## Step 4: Fetch Latest Main Branch
+
+### Call GitHub API for latest commit on main (with timeout)
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+### Extract commit SHA (short)
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"sha": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4 | cut -c1-7, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+### Extract commit message (first line only)
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null | grep '"message":' | cut -d'"' -f4 | cut -d'\' -f1, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+### Extract commit date
+```bash
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"date": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4, timeout: 30000)
+```
+
+**Output Format**:
+```
+Latest Dev: a03415b
+Message: feat: Add version tracking and upgrade check system
+Date: 2025-10-03T04:46:44Z
+```
+
+## Step 5: Compare Versions and Suggest Upgrade
+
+### Normalize versions (remove 'v' prefix)
+```bash
+bash(echo "v3.2.1" | sed 's/^v//')
+```
+
+### Compare two versions
+```bash
+bash(printf "%s\n%s" "3.2.1" "3.2.2" | sort -V | tail -n 1)
+```
+
+### Check if versions are equal
+```bash
+# If equal: Up to date
+# If remote newer: Upgrade available
+# If local newer: Development version
+```
+
+**Output Scenarios**:
+
+**Scenario 1: Up to date**
+```
+✅ You are on the latest stable version (3.2.1)
+```
+
+**Scenario 2: Upgrade available**
+```
+⬆️ A newer stable version is available: v3.2.2
+Your version: 3.2.1
+
+To upgrade:
+PowerShell: iex (iwr -useb https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/main/install-remote.ps1)
+Bash: bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/main/install-remote.sh)
+```
+
+**Scenario 3: Development version**
+```
+✨ You are running a development version (3.4.0-dev)
+This is newer than the latest stable release (v3.3.0)
+```
+
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Basic Operations
+```bash
+# Check local version file
+bash(test -f ./.claude/version.json && cat ./.claude/version.json)
+
+# Check global version file
+bash(test -f ~/.claude/version.json && cat ~/.claude/version.json)
+
+# Extract version from JSON
+bash(cat version.json | grep -o '"version": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+
+# Extract date from JSON
+bash(cat version.json | grep -o '"installation_date_utc": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+
+# Fetch latest release (with timeout)
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null, timeout: 30000)
+
+# Extract tag name
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"tag_name": *"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4, timeout: 30000)
+
+# Extract release name
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"name": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4, timeout: 30000)
+
+# Fetch latest commit (with timeout)
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null, timeout: 30000)
+
+# Extract commit SHA
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"sha": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4 | cut -c1-7, timeout: 30000)
+
+# Extract commit message (first line)
+bash(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main" 2>/dev/null | grep '"message":' | cut -d'"' -f4 | cut -d'\' -f1, timeout: 30000)
+
+# Compare versions
+bash(printf "%s\n%s" "3.2.1" "3.2.2" | sort -V | tail -n 1)
+
+# Remove 'v' prefix
+bash(echo "v3.2.1" | sed 's/^v//')
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### No installation found
+```
+WARNING: Claude Code Workflow not installed
+Install using:
+PowerShell: iex (iwr -useb https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/main/install-remote.ps1)
+```
+
+### Network error
+```
+ERROR: Could not fetch latest version from GitHub
+Check your network connection
+```
+
+### Invalid version.json
+```
+ERROR: version.json is invalid or corrupted
+```
+
+## Design Notes
+
+- Uses simple, direct bash commands instead of complex functions
+- Each step is independent and can be executed separately
+- Fallback to grep/sed for JSON parsing (no jq dependency required)
+- Network calls use curl with error suppression and 30-second timeout
+- Version comparison uses `sort -V` for accurate semantic versioning
+- Use `/commits/main` API instead of `/branches/main` for more reliable commit info
+- Extract first line of commit message using `cut -d'\' -f1` to handle JSON escape sequences
+
+## API Endpoints
+
+### GitHub API Used
+- **Latest Release**: `https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases/latest`
+  - Fields: `tag_name`, `name`, `published_at`
+- **Latest Commit**: `https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/main`
+  - Fields: `sha`, `commit.message`, `commit.author.date`
+
+### Timeout Configuration
+All network calls should use `timeout: 30000` (30 seconds) to handle slow connections.
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/cli:cli-init` - Initialize CLI configurations
+- `/workflow:session:list` - List workflow sessions

.claude/commands/workflow/action-plan-verify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+---
+name: action-plan-verify
+description: Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis of IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json before execution
+usage: /workflow:action-plan-verify [--session <session-id>]
+argument-hint: "optional: --session <session-id>"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:action-plan-verify
+  - /workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-auth
+allowed-tools: Read(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Goal
+
+Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items between action planning artifacts (`IMPL_PLAN.md`, `task.json`) and brainstorming artifacts (`synthesis-specification.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/workflow:plan` has successfully produced complete `IMPL_PLAN.md` and task JSON files.
+
+## Operating Constraints
+
+**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands).
+
+**Synthesis Authority**: The `synthesis-specification.md` is **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
+
+```bash
+# Detect active workflow session
+IF --session parameter provided:
+    session_id = provided session
+ELSE:
+    CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+    IF active_session EXISTS:
+        session_id = get_active_session()
+    ELSE:
+        ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id>"
+        EXIT
+
+# Derive absolute paths
+session_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}
+brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
+task_dir = session_dir/.task
+
+# Validate required artifacts
+SYNTHESIS = brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
+IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
+TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
+
+# Abort if missing
+IF NOT EXISTS(SYNTHESIS):
+    ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
+    EXIT
+
+IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
+    ERROR: "IMPL_PLAN.md not found. Run /workflow:plan first"
+    EXIT
+
+IF TASK_FILES.count == 0:
+    ERROR: "No task JSON files found. Run /workflow:plan first"
+    EXIT
+```
+
+### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
+
+Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
+
+**From synthesis-specification.md**:
+- Functional Requirements (IDs, descriptions, acceptance criteria)
+- Non-Functional Requirements (IDs, targets)
+- Business Requirements (IDs, success metrics)
+- Key Architecture Decisions
+- Risk factors and mitigation strategies
+- Implementation Roadmap (high-level phases)
+
+**From IMPL_PLAN.md**:
+- Summary and objectives
+- Context Analysis
+- Implementation Strategy
+- Task Breakdown Summary
+- Success Criteria
+- Brainstorming Artifacts References (if present)
+
+**From task.json files**:
+- Task IDs
+- Titles and descriptions
+- Status
+- Dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
+- Context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, artifacts)
+- Flow control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach)
+- Meta (complexity, priority, use_codex)
+
+### 3. Build Semantic Models
+
+Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
+
+**Requirements inventory**:
+- Each functional/non-functional/business requirement with stable ID
+- Requirement text, acceptance criteria, priority
+
+**Architecture decisions inventory**:
+- ADRs from synthesis
+- Technology choices
+- Data model references
+
+**Task coverage mapping**:
+- Map each task to one or more requirements (by ID reference or keyword inference)
+- Map each requirement to covering tasks
+
+**Dependency graph**:
+- Task-to-task dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
+- Requirement-level dependencies (from synthesis)
+
+### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
+
+Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
+
+#### A. Requirements Coverage Analysis
+
+- **Orphaned Requirements**: Requirements in synthesis with zero associated tasks
+- **Unmapped Tasks**: Tasks with no clear requirement linkage
+- **NFR Coverage Gaps**: Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability) not reflected in tasks
+
+#### B. Consistency Validation
+
+- **Requirement Conflicts**: Tasks contradicting synthesis requirements
+- **Architecture Drift**: IMPL_PLAN architecture not matching synthesis ADRs
+- **Terminology Drift**: Same concept named differently across IMPL_PLAN and tasks
+- **Data Model Inconsistency**: Tasks referencing entities/fields not in synthesis data model
+
+#### C. Dependency Integrity
+
+- **Circular Dependencies**: Task A depends on B, B depends on C, C depends on A
+- **Missing Dependencies**: Task requires outputs from another task but no explicit dependency
+- **Broken Dependencies**: Task depends on non-existent task ID
+- **Logical Ordering Issues**: Implementation tasks before foundational setup without dependency note
+
+#### D. Synthesis Alignment
+
+- **Priority Conflicts**: High-priority synthesis requirements mapped to low-priority tasks
+- **Success Criteria Mismatch**: IMPL_PLAN success criteria not covering synthesis acceptance criteria
+- **Risk Mitigation Gaps**: Critical risks in synthesis without corresponding mitigation tasks
+
+#### E. Task Specification Quality
+
+- **Ambiguous Focus Paths**: Tasks with vague or missing focus_paths
+- **Underspecified Acceptance**: Tasks without clear acceptance criteria
+- **Missing Artifacts References**: Tasks not referencing relevant brainstorming artifacts in context.artifacts
+- **Weak Flow Control**: Tasks without clear implementation_approach or pre_analysis steps
+- **Missing Target Files**: Tasks without flow_control.target_files specification
+
+#### F. Duplication Detection
+
+- **Overlapping Task Scope**: Multiple tasks with nearly identical descriptions
+- **Redundant Requirements Coverage**: Same requirement covered by multiple tasks without clear partitioning
+
+#### G. Feasibility Assessment
+
+- **Complexity Misalignment**: Task marked "simple" but requires multiple file modifications
+- **Resource Conflicts**: Parallel tasks requiring same resources/files
+- **Skill Gap Risks**: Tasks requiring skills not in team capability assessment (from synthesis)
+
+### 5. Severity Assignment
+
+Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
+
+- **CRITICAL**:
+  - Violates synthesis authority (requirement conflict)
+  - Core requirement with zero coverage
+  - Circular dependencies
+  - Broken dependencies
+
+- **HIGH**:
+  - NFR coverage gaps
+  - Priority conflicts
+  - Missing risk mitigation tasks
+  - Ambiguous acceptance criteria
+
+- **MEDIUM**:
+  - Terminology drift
+  - Missing artifacts references
+  - Weak flow control
+  - Logical ordering issues
+
+- **LOW**:
+  - Style/wording improvements
+  - Minor redundancy not affecting execution
+
+### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
+
+Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
+
+```markdown
+## Action Plan Verification Report
+
+**Session**: WFS-{session-id}
+**Generated**: {timestamp}
+**Artifacts Analyzed**: synthesis-specification.md, IMPL_PLAN.md, {N} task files
+
+---
+
+### Executive Summary
+
+- **Overall Risk Level**: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
+- **Recommendation**: BLOCK_EXECUTION | PROCEED_WITH_FIXES | PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION | PROCEED
+- **Critical Issues**: {count}
+- **High Issues**: {count}
+- **Medium Issues**: {count}
+- **Low Issues**: {count}
+
+---
+
+### Findings Summary
+
+| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
+| C1 | Coverage | CRITICAL | synthesis:FR-03 | Requirement "User auth" has zero task coverage | Add authentication implementation task |
+| H1 | Consistency | HIGH | IMPL-1.2 vs synthesis:ADR-02 | Task uses REST while synthesis specifies GraphQL | Align task with ADR-02 decision |
+| M1 | Specification | MEDIUM | IMPL-2.1 | Missing context.artifacts reference | Add @synthesis reference |
+| L1 | Duplication | LOW | IMPL-3.1, IMPL-3.2 | Similar scope | Consider merging |
+
+(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by severity initial.)
+
+---
+
+### Requirements Coverage Analysis
+
+| Requirement ID | Requirement Summary | Has Task? | Task IDs | Priority Match | Notes |
+|----------------|---------------------|-----------|----------|----------------|-------|
+| FR-01 | User authentication | ✅ Yes | IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2 | ✅ Match | Complete |
+| FR-02 | Data export | ✅ Yes | IMPL-2.3 | ⚠️ Mismatch | High req → Med priority task |
+| FR-03 | Profile management | ❌ No | - | - | **CRITICAL: Zero coverage** |
+| NFR-01 | Response time <200ms | ❌ No | - | - | **HIGH: No performance tasks** |
+
+**Coverage Metrics**:
+- Functional Requirements: 85% (17/20 covered)
+- Non-Functional Requirements: 40% (2/5 covered)
+- Business Requirements: 100% (5/5 covered)
+
+---
+
+### Unmapped Tasks
+
+| Task ID | Title | Issue | Recommendation |
+|---------|-------|-------|----------------|
+| IMPL-4.5 | Refactor utils | No requirement linkage | Link to technical debt or remove |
+
+---
+
+### Dependency Graph Issues
+
+**Circular Dependencies**: None detected ✅
+
+**Broken Dependencies**:
+- IMPL-2.3 depends on "IMPL-2.4" (non-existent)
+
+**Logical Ordering Issues**:
+- IMPL-5.1 (integration test) has no dependency on IMPL-1.* (implementation tasks)
+
+---
+
+### Synthesis Alignment Issues
+
+| Issue Type | Synthesis Reference | IMPL_PLAN/Task | Impact | Recommendation |
+|------------|---------------------|----------------|--------|----------------|
+| Architecture Conflict | synthesis:ADR-01 (JWT auth) | IMPL_PLAN uses session cookies | HIGH | Update IMPL_PLAN to use JWT |
+| Priority Mismatch | synthesis:FR-02 (High) | IMPL-2.3 (Medium) | MEDIUM | Elevate task priority |
+| Missing Risk Mitigation | synthesis:Risk-03 (API rate limits) | No mitigation tasks | HIGH | Add rate limiting implementation task |
+
+---
+
+### Task Specification Quality Issues
+
+**Missing Artifacts References**: 12 tasks lack context.artifacts
+**Weak Flow Control**: 5 tasks lack implementation_approach
+**Missing Target Files**: 8 tasks lack flow_control.target_files
+
+**Sample Issues**:
+- IMPL-1.2: No context.artifacts reference to synthesis
+- IMPL-3.1: Missing flow_control.target_files specification
+- IMPL-4.2: Vague focus_paths ["src/"] - needs refinement
+
+---
+
+### Feasibility Concerns
+
+| Concern | Tasks Affected | Issue | Recommendation |
+|---------|----------------|-------|----------------|
+| Skill Gap | IMPL-6.1, IMPL-6.2 | Requires Kubernetes expertise not in team | Add training task or external consultant |
+| Resource Conflict | IMPL-3.1, IMPL-3.2 | Both modify src/auth/service.ts in parallel | Add dependency or serialize |
+
+---
+
+### Metrics
+
+- **Total Requirements**: 30 (20 functional, 5 non-functional, 5 business)
+- **Total Tasks**: 25
+- **Overall Coverage**: 77% (23/30 requirements with ≥1 task)
+- **Critical Issues**: 2
+- **High Issues**: 5
+- **Medium Issues**: 8
+- **Low Issues**: 3
+
+---
+
+### Next Actions
+
+#### If CRITICAL Issues Exist (Current Status: 2 CRITICAL)
+**Recommendation**: ❌ **BLOCK EXECUTION** - Resolve CRITICAL issues before proceeding
+
+**Required Actions**:
+1. **CRITICAL**: Add authentication implementation tasks to cover FR-03
+2. **CRITICAL**: Add performance optimization tasks to cover NFR-01
+
+#### If Only HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW Issues
+**Recommendation**: ⚠️ **PROCEED WITH CAUTION** - Issues are non-blocking but should be addressed
+
+**Suggested Improvements**:
+1. Add context.artifacts references to all tasks (use /task:replan)
+2. Fix broken dependency IMPL-2.3 → IMPL-2.4
+3. Add flow_control.target_files to underspecified tasks
+
+#### Command Suggestions
+```bash
+# Fix critical coverage gaps
+/task:create "Implement user authentication (FR-03)"
+/task:create "Add performance optimization (NFR-01)"
+
+# Refine existing tasks
+/task:replan IMPL-1.2 "Add context.artifacts and target_files"
+
+# Update IMPL_PLAN if architecture drift detected
+# (Manual edit required)
+```
+```
+
+### 7. Provide Remediation Options
+
+At end of report, ask the user:
+
+```markdown
+### 🔧 Remediation Options
+
+Would you like me to:
+1. **Generate task suggestions** for unmapped requirements (no auto-creation)
+2. **Provide specific edit commands** for top N issues (you execute manually)
+3. **Create remediation checklist** for systematic fixing
+
+(Do NOT apply fixes automatically - this is read-only analysis)
+```
+
+### 8. Update Session Metadata
+
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "PLAN": {
+      "status": "completed",
+      "action_plan_verification": {
+        "completed": true,
+        "completed_at": "timestamp",
+        "overall_risk_level": "HIGH",
+        "recommendation": "PROCEED_WITH_FIXES",
+        "issues": {
+          "critical": 2,
+          "high": 5,
+          "medium": 8,
+          "low": 3
+        },
+        "coverage": {
+          "functional_requirements": 0.85,
+          "non_functional_requirements": 0.40,
+          "business_requirements": 1.00
+        },
+        "report_path": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Operating Principles
+
+### Context Efficiency
+- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings
+- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
+- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
+- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent IDs and counts
+
+### Analysis Guidelines
+- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
+- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
+- **Prioritize synthesis violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
+- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances)
+- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
+
+### Verification Taxonomy
+- **Coverage**: Requirements → Tasks mapping
+- **Consistency**: Cross-artifact alignment
+- **Dependencies**: Task ordering and relationships
+- **Synthesis Alignment**: Adherence to authoritative requirements
+- **Task Quality**: Specification completeness
+- **Feasibility**: Implementation risks
+
+## Behavior Rules
+
+- **If no issues found**: Report "✅ Action plan verification passed. No issues detected." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:execute`.
+- **If CRITICAL issues exist**: Recommend blocking execution until resolved.
+- **If only HIGH/MEDIUM issues**: User may proceed with caution, but provide improvement suggestions.
+- **If IMPL_PLAN.md or task files missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:plan` first.
+- **Always provide actionable remediation suggestions**: Don't just identify problems—suggest solutions.
+
+## Context
+
+{ARGS}

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/artifacts.md

@@ -1,51 +1,63 @@
 ---
 name: artifacts
-description: Topic discussion, decomposition, and analysis artifacts generation through structured inquiry
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>"
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for discussion and analysis"
+description: Generate role-specific topic-framework.md dynamically based on selected roles
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>" [--roles "role1,role2,role3"]
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for framework generation"
 examples:
   - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Implement secure authentication system"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize database performance" --roles "system-architect,data-architect,subject-matter-expert"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Implement secure authentication system" --roles "ui-designer,ux-expert,subject-matter-expert"
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
-# Workflow Brainstorm Artifacts Command
+# Topic Framework Generator Command
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>"
+/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>" [--roles "role1,role2,role3"]
 ```
 
 ## Purpose
-Dedicated command for topic discussion, decomposition, and analysis artifacts generation. This command focuses on interactive exploration and documentation creation without complex agent workflows.
+**Generate dynamic topic-framework.md tailored to selected roles**. Creates role-specific discussion frameworks that address relevant perspectives. If no roles specified, generates comprehensive framework covering common analysis areas.
+
+## Role-Based Framework Generation
+
+**Dynamic Generation**: Framework content adapts based on selected roles
+- **With roles**: Generate targeted discussion points for specified roles only
+- **Without roles**: Generate comprehensive framework covering all common areas
 
 ## Core Workflow
 
-### Discussion & Artifacts Generation Process
+### Topic Framework Generation Process
 
-**0. Session Management** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **MCP Tools Integration**: Use Code Index for technical context, Exa for industry insights
+**Phase 1: Session Management** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
 - **Active session detection**: Check `.workflow/.active-*` markers
 - **Session selection**: Prompt user if multiple active sessions found
 - **Auto-creation**: Create `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Context isolation**: Each session maintains independent analysis state
+- **Framework check**: Check if `topic-framework.md` exists (update vs create mode)
 
-**1. Topic Discussion & Inquiry**
-- **Interactive exploration**: Direct conversation about topic aspects
-- **Structured questioning**: Key areas of investigation
-- **Context gathering**: User input and requirements clarification
-- **Perspective collection**: Multiple viewpoints and considerations
+**Phase 2: Role Analysis** ⚠️ NEW
+- **Parse roles parameter**: Extract roles from `--roles "role1,role2,role3"` if provided
+- **Role validation**: Verify each role is valid (matches available role commands)
+- **Store role list**: Save selected roles to session metadata for reference
+- **Default behavior**: If no roles specified, use comprehensive coverage
 
-**2. Topic Decomposition**
-- **Component identification**: Break down topic into key areas
-- **Relationship mapping**: Connections between components
-- **Priority assessment**: Importance and urgency evaluation
-- **Constraint analysis**: Limitations and requirements
+**Phase 3: Dynamic Topic Analysis**
+- **Scope definition**: Define topic boundaries and objectives
+- **Stakeholder identification**: Identify key users and stakeholders based on selected roles
+- **Requirements gathering**: Extract requirements relevant to selected roles
+- **Context collection**: Gather context appropriate for role perspectives
 
-**3. Analysis Artifacts Generation**
-- **Discussion summary**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/discussion-summary.md` - Key points and insights
-- **Component analysis**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/component-analysis.md` - Detailed decomposition
+**Phase 4: Role-Specific Framework Generation**
+- **Discussion points creation**: Generate 3-5 discussion areas **tailored to selected roles**
+- **Role-targeted questions**: Create questions specifically for chosen roles
+- **Framework document**: Generate `topic-framework.md` with role-specific sections
+- **Validation check**: Ensure framework addresses all selected role perspectives
+
+**Phase 5: Metadata Storage**
+- **Save role assignment**: Store selected roles in session metadata
+- **Framework versioning**: Track which roles framework addresses
+- **Update tracking**: Maintain role evolution if framework updated
 
 ## Implementation Standards
 
@@ -74,62 +86,200 @@ Dedicated command for topic discussion, decomposition, and analysis artifacts ge
 
 ## Document Generation
 
-**Workflow**: Topic Discussion → Component Analysis → Documentation
+**Primary Output**: Single structured `topic-framework.md` document
 
 **Document Structure**:
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
-├── discussion-summary.md       # Main conversation and insights
-└── component-analysis.md       # Detailed topic breakdown
+└── topic-framework.md          # ★ STRUCTURED FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT
 ```
 
-**Document Templates**:
+**Note**: `workflow-session.json` is located at `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/workflow-session.json` (session root), not inside `.brainstorming/`.
 
-### discussion-summary.md
+## Framework Template Structures
+
+### Dynamic Role-Based Framework
+
+Framework content adapts based on `--roles` parameter:
+
+#### Option 1: Specific Roles Provided
 ```markdown
-# Topic Discussion Summary: [topic]
+# [Topic] - Discussion Framework
 
-## Overview
-Brief description of the topic and its scope.
+## Topic Overview
+- **Scope**: [Topic boundaries relevant to selected roles]
+- **Objectives**: [Goals from perspective of selected roles]
+- **Context**: [Background focusing on role-specific concerns]
+- **Target Roles**: ui-designer, system-architect, subject-matter-expert
 
-## Key Insights
-- Major points discovered during discussion
-- Important considerations identified
-- Critical success factors
+## Role-Specific Discussion Points
 
-## Questions Explored
-- Primary areas of investigation
-- User responses and clarifications
-- Open questions requiring further research
+### For UI Designer
+1. **User Interface Requirements**
+   - What interface components are needed?
+   - What user interactions must be supported?
+   - What visual design considerations apply?
 
-## Next Steps
-- Recommended follow-up actions
-- Areas needing deeper analysis
+2. **User Experience Challenges**
+   - What are the key user journeys?
+   - What accessibility requirements exist?
+   - How to balance aesthetics with functionality?
+
+### For System Architect
+1. **Architecture Decisions**
+   - What architectural patterns fit this solution?
+   - What scalability requirements exist?
+   - How does this integrate with existing systems?
+
+2. **Technical Implementation**
+   - What technology stack is appropriate?
+   - What are the performance requirements?
+   - What dependencies must be managed?
+
+### For Subject Matter Expert
+1. **Domain Expertise & Standards**
+   - What industry standards and best practices apply?
+   - What regulatory compliance requirements exist?
+   - What domain-specific patterns should be followed?
+
+2. **Technical Quality & Risk**
+   - What technical debt considerations exist?
+   - What scalability and maintenance implications apply?
+   - What knowledge transfer and documentation is needed?
+
+## Cross-Role Integration Points
+- How do UI decisions impact architecture?
+- How does architecture constrain UI possibilities?
+- What domain standards affect both UI and architecture?
+
+## Framework Usage
+**For Role Agents**: Address your specific section + integration points
+**Reference Format**: @../topic-framework.md in your analysis.md
+**Update Process**: Use /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts to update
+
+---
+*Generated for roles: ui-designer, system-architect, subject-matter-expert*
+*Last updated: [timestamp]*
 ```
 
-### component-analysis.md
+#### Option 2: No Roles Specified (Comprehensive)
 ```markdown
-# Component Analysis: [topic]
+# [Topic] - Discussion Framework
 
-## Core Components
-Detailed breakdown of main topic elements:
+## Topic Overview
+- **Scope**: [Comprehensive topic boundaries]
+- **Objectives**: [All-encompassing goals]
+- **Context**: [Full background and constraints]
+- **Stakeholders**: [All relevant parties]
 
-### Component 1: [Name]
-- **Purpose**: What it does
-- **Dependencies**: What it relies on
-- **Interfaces**: How it connects to other components
+## Core Discussion Areas
 
-### Component 2: [Name]
-- **Purpose**:
-- **Dependencies**:
-- **Interfaces**:
+### 1. Requirements & Objectives
+- What are the fundamental requirements?
+- What are the critical success factors?
+- What constraints must be considered?
 
-## Component Relationships
-- How components interact
-- Data flow between components
-- Critical dependencies
+### 2. Technical & Architecture
+- What are the technical challenges?
+- What architectural decisions are needed?
+- What integration points exist?
+
+### 3. User Experience & Design
+- Who are the primary users?
+- What are the key user journeys?
+- What usability requirements exist?
+
+### 4. Security & Compliance
+- What security requirements exist?
+- What compliance considerations apply?
+- What data protection is needed?
+
+### 5. Implementation & Operations
+- What are the implementation risks?
+- What resources are required?
+- How will this be maintained?
+
+## Available Role Perspectives
+Framework supports analysis from any of these roles:
+- **Technical**: system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
+- **Product & Design**: ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
+- **Agile & Quality**: scrum-master, test-strategist
+
+---
+*Comprehensive framework - adaptable to any role*
+*Last updated: [timestamp]*
 ```
 
+## Role-Specific Content Generation
+
+### Available Roles and Their Focus Areas
+
+**Technical Roles**:
+- `system-architect`: Architecture patterns, scalability, technology stack, integration
+- `data-architect`: Data modeling, processing workflows, analytics, storage
+- `subject-matter-expert`: Domain expertise, industry standards, compliance, best practices
+
+**Product & Design Roles**:
+- `ui-designer`: User interface, visual design, interaction patterns, accessibility
+- `ux-expert`: User experience optimization, usability testing, interaction design, design systems
+- `product-manager`: Business value, feature prioritization, market positioning, roadmap
+- `product-owner`: Backlog management, user stories, acceptance criteria, stakeholder alignment
+
+**Agile & Quality Roles**:
+- `scrum-master`: Sprint planning, team dynamics, process optimization, delivery management
+- `test-strategist`: Testing strategies, quality assurance, test automation, validation approaches
+
+### Dynamic Discussion Point Generation
+
+**For each selected role, generate**:
+1. **2-3 core discussion areas** specific to that role's perspective
+2. **3-5 targeted questions** per discussion area
+3. **Cross-role integration points** showing how roles interact
+
+**Example mapping**:
+```javascript
+// If roles = ["ui-designer", "system-architect"]
+Generate:
+- UI Designer section: UI Requirements, UX Challenges
+- System Architect section: Architecture Decisions, Technical Implementation
+- Integration Points: UI↔Architecture dependencies
+```
+
+### Framework Generation Examples
+
+#### Example 1: Architecture-Heavy Topic
+```bash
+/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Design scalable microservices platform" --roles "system-architect,data-architect,subject-matter-expert"
+```
+**Generated framework focuses on**:
+- Service architecture and communication patterns
+- Data flow and storage strategies
+- Domain standards and best practices
+
+#### Example 2: User-Focused Topic
+```bash
+/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Improve user onboarding experience" --roles "ui-designer,ux-expert,product-manager"
+```
+**Generated framework focuses on**:
+- Onboarding flow and UI components
+- User experience optimization and usability
+- Business value and success metrics
+
+#### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
+```bash
+/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize sprint delivery process" --roles "scrum-master,product-owner,test-strategist"
+```
+**Generated framework focuses on**:
+- Sprint planning and team collaboration
+- Backlog management and prioritization
+- Quality assurance and testing strategies
+
+#### Example 4: Comprehensive Analysis
+```bash
+/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Build real-time collaboration feature"
+```
+**Generated framework covers** all aspects (no roles specified)
+
 ## Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
 - **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before processing
 - **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active sessions
@@ -162,19 +312,46 @@ Detailed breakdown of main topic elements:
 - **Alternatives**: What other approaches exist?
 - **Migration**: How do we transition from current state?
 
-## Quality Standards
+## Update Mechanism ⚠️ SMART UPDATES
 
-### Discussion Excellence
-- **Comprehensive exploration**: Cover all relevant aspects of the topic
-- **Clear documentation**: Capture insights in structured, readable format
-- **Actionable outcomes**: Generate practical next steps and recommendations
-- **User-driven**: Follow user interests and priorities in the discussion
+### Framework Update Logic
+```bash
+# Check existing framework
+IF topic-framework.md EXISTS:
+    SHOW current framework to user
+    ASK: "Framework exists. Do you want to:"
+    OPTIONS:
+      1. "Replace completely" → Generate new framework
+      2. "Add discussion points" → Append to existing
+      3. "Refine existing points" → Interactive editing
+      4. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+ELSE:
+    CREATE new framework
+```
 
-### Documentation Quality
-- **Structured format**: Use consistent templates for easy navigation
-- **Complete coverage**: Document all important discussion points
-- **Clear language**: Avoid jargon, explain technical concepts
-- **Practical focus**: Emphasize actionable insights and recommendations
+### Update Strategies
+
+**1. Complete Replacement**
+- Backup existing framework as `topic-framework-[timestamp].md.backup`
+- Generate completely new framework
+- Preserve role-specific analysis points from previous version
+
+**2. Incremental Addition**
+- Load existing framework
+- Identify new discussion areas through user interaction
+- Add new sections while preserving existing structure
+- Update framework usage instructions
+
+**3. Refinement Mode**
+- Interactive editing of existing discussion points
+- Allow modification of scope, objectives, and questions
+- Preserve framework structure and role assignments
+- Update timestamp and version info
+
+### Version Control
+- **Backup Creation**: Always backup before major changes
+- **Change Tracking**: Include change summary in framework footer
+- **Rollback Support**: Keep previous version accessible
 
 ## Error Handling
 - **Session creation failure**: Provide clear error message and retry option

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-parallel.md

@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+---
+name: auto-parallel
+description: Parallel brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and concurrent execution
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>"
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Build real-time collaboration feature"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Implement secure authentication system"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Brainstorm Parallel Auto Command
+
+## Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>"
+```
+
+## Role Selection Logic
+- **Technical & Architecture**: `architecture|system|performance|database|security` → system-architect, data-architect, security-expert, subject-matter-expert
+- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, user-researcher, product-manager, ux-expert, product-owner
+- **Business & Process**: `business|process|workflow|cost|innovation|testing` → business-analyst, innovation-lead, test-strategist
+- **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
+- **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
+- **Multi-role**: Complex topics automatically select 2-3 complementary roles
+- **Default**: `product-manager` if no clear match
+
+**Template Loading**: `bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role-name>.md"))`
+**Template Source**: `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
+**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
+
+**Example**:
+```bash
+bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/system-architect.md"))
+bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ui-designer.md"))
+```
+
+## Core Workflow
+
+### Structured Topic Processing → Role Analysis → Synthesis
+The command follows a structured three-phase approach with dedicated document types:
+
+**Phase 1: Framework Generation** ⚠️ COMMAND EXECUTION
+- **Role selection**: Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic)
+- **Call artifacts command**: Execute `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --roles "{role1,role2,role3}"` using SlashCommand tool
+- **Role-specific framework**: Generate framework with sections tailored to selected roles
+
+**Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution** ⚠️ PARALLEL AGENT ANALYSIS
+- **Parallel execution**: Multiple roles execute simultaneously for faster completion
+- **Independent agents**: Each role gets dedicated conceptual-planning-agent running in parallel
+- **Shared framework**: All roles reference the same topic framework for consistency
+- **Concurrent generation**: Role-specific analysis documents generated simultaneously
+- **Progress tracking**: Parallel agents update progress independently
+
+**Phase 3: Synthesis Generation** ⚠️ COMMAND EXECUTION
+- **Call synthesis command**: Execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` using SlashCommand tool
+
+## Implementation Standards
+
+### Simplified Command Orchestration ⚠️ STREAMLINED
+Auto command coordinates independent specialized commands:
+
+**Command Sequence**:
+1. **Role Selection**: Auto-select 2-3 relevant roles based on topic keywords
+2. **Generate Role-Specific Framework**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --roles "{role1,role2,role3}"`
+3. **Parallel Role Analysis**: Execute selected role agents in parallel, each reading their specific framework section
+4. **Generate Synthesis**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis`
+
+**SlashCommand Integration**:
+1. **artifacts command**: Called via SlashCommand tool with `--roles` parameter for role-specific framework generation
+2. **role agents**: Each agent reads its dedicated section in the role-specific framework
+3. **synthesis command**: Called via SlashCommand tool for final integration with role-targeted insights
+4. **Command coordination**: SlashCommand handles execution and validation
+
+**Role Selection Logic**:
+- **Technical**: `architecture|system|performance|database` → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
+- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
+- **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
+- **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
+- **Auto-select**: 2-3 most relevant roles based on topic analysis
+
+### Simplified Processing Standards
+
+**Core Principles**:
+1. **Minimal preprocessing** - Only workflow-session.json and basic role selection
+2. **Agent autonomy** - Agents handle their own context and validation
+3. **Parallel execution** - Multiple agents can work simultaneously
+4. **Post-processing synthesis** - Integration happens after agent completion
+5. **TodoWrite control** - Progress tracking throughout all phases
+
+**Implementation Rules**:
+- **Maximum 3 roles**: Auto-selected based on simple keyword mapping
+- **No upfront validation**: Agents handle their own context requirements
+- **Parallel execution**: Each agent operates concurrently without dependencies
+- **Synthesis at end**: Integration only after all agents complete
+
+**Agent Self-Management** (Agents decide their own approach):
+- **Context gathering**: Agents determine what questions to ask
+- **Template usage**: Agents load and apply their own role templates
+- **Analysis depth**: Agents determine appropriate level of detail
+- **Documentation**: Agents create their own file structure and content
+
+### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
+- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before role processing
+- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active brainstorming sessions
+- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
+- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
+- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session for all role processing
+- **Context preservation**: Each role's context and agent output stored in session directory
+- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent brainstorming state and role assignments
+
+## Document Generation
+
+**Command Coordination Workflow**: artifacts → parallel role analysis → synthesis
+
+**Output Structure**: Coordinated commands generate framework, role analyses, and synthesis documents as defined in their respective command specifications.
+
+
+## Agent Prompt Templates
+
+### Task Agent Invocation Template
+
+
+```bash
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: {role-name} perspective for {topic}
+
+     ## Role Assignment
+     **ASSIGNED_ROLE**: {role-name}
+     **TOPIC**: {user-provided-topic}
+     **OUTPUT_LOCATION**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/
+
+     ## Execution Instructions
+     [FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+     ### Flow Control Steps
+     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these pre_analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
+
+     1. **load_topic_framework**
+        - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+        - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'Topic framework not found')
+        - Output: topic_framework
+
+     2. **load_role_template**
+        - Action: Load {role-name} planning template
+        - Command: bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
+        - Output: role_template
+
+     3. **load_session_metadata**
+        - Action: Load session metadata and topic description
+        - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')
+        - Output: session_metadata
+
+     ### Implementation Context
+     **Topic Framework**: Use loaded topic-framework.md for structured analysis
+     **Role Focus**: {role-name} domain expertise and perspective
+     **Analysis Type**: Address framework discussion points from role perspective
+     **Template Framework**: Combine role template with topic framework structure
+     **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing all topic framework points
+
+     ### Session Context
+     **Workflow Directory**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/
+     **Output Directory**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/
+     **Session JSON**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json
+
+     ### Dependencies & Context
+     **Topic**: {user-provided-topic}
+     **Role Template**: "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"
+     **User Requirements**: To be gathered through interactive questioning
+
+     ## Completion Requirements
+     1. Execute all flow control steps in sequence (load topic framework, role template, session metadata)
+     2. **Address Topic Framework**: Respond to all discussion points in topic-framework.md from role perspective
+     3. Apply role template guidelines within topic framework structure
+     4. Generate structured role analysis addressing framework points
+     5. Create single comprehensive deliverable in OUTPUT_LOCATION:
+        - analysis.md (structured analysis addressing all topic framework points with role-specific insights)
+     6. Include framework reference: @../topic-framework.md in analysis.md
+     7. Update workflow-session.json with completion status",
+     description="Execute {role-name} brainstorming analysis")
+```
+
+### Parallel Role Agent调用示例
+```bash
+# Execute multiple roles in parallel using single message with multiple Task calls
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: system-architect perspective for {topic}...",
+     description="Execute system-architect brainstorming analysis")
+
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: ui-designer perspective for {topic}...",
+     description="Execute ui-designer brainstorming analysis")
+
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: security-expert perspective for {topic}...",
+     description="Execute security-expert brainstorming analysis")
+```
+
+### Direct Synthesis Process (Command-Driven)
+**Synthesis execution**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` after role completion
+
+
+## TodoWrite Control Flow ⚠️ CRITICAL
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+**MANDATORY**: Use Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite tool throughout entire brainstorming workflow:
+
+```javascript
+// Phase 1: Create initial todo list for command-coordinated brainstorming workflow
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Initialize brainstorming session and detect active sessions",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Initializing brainstorming session"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Select roles based on topic keyword analysis",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Selecting roles for brainstorming analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute artifacts command with selected roles for role-specific framework",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating role-specific topic framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute [role-1] analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL] addressing framework",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing [role-1] structured framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute [role-2] analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL] addressing framework",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing [role-2] structured framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute synthesis command using SlashCommand for final integration",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing synthesis command for integrated analysis"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+
+// Phase 2: Update status as workflow progresses - ONLY ONE task should be in_progress at a time
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Initialize brainstorming session and detect active sessions",
+      status: "completed",  // Mark completed preprocessing
+      activeForm: "Initializing brainstorming session"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Select roles for topic analysis and create workflow-session.json",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Mark current task as in_progress
+      activeForm: "Selecting roles and creating session metadata"
+    },
+    // ... other tasks remain pending
+  ]
+});
+
+// Phase 3: Parallel agent execution tracking
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    // ... previous completed tasks
+    {
+      content: "Execute system-architect analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
+      activeForm: "Executing system-architect brainstorming analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute ui-designer analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
+      activeForm: "Executing ui-designer brainstorming analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute security-expert analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
+      activeForm: "Executing security-expert brainstorming analysis"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**TodoWrite Integration Rules**:
+1. **Create initial todos**: All workflow phases at start
+2. **Mark in_progress**: Multiple parallel tasks can be in_progress simultaneously
+3. **Update immediately**: After each task completion
+4. **Track agent execution**: Include [agent-type] and [FLOW_CONTROL] markers for parallel agents
+5. **Final synthesis**: Mark synthesis as in_progress only after all parallel agents complete
+
+## Reference Information
+
+### Structured Processing Schema
+Each role processing follows structured framework pattern:
+- **topic_framework**: Structured discussion framework document
+- **role**: Selected planning role name with framework reference
+- **agent**: Dedicated conceptual-planning-agent instance
+- **structured_analysis**: Agent addresses all framework discussion points
+- **output**: Role-specific analysis.md addressing topic framework structure
+
+### File Structure Reference
+**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
+**Role Templates**: @~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/
+
+### Execution Integration
+Command coordination model: artifacts command → parallel role analysis → synthesis command
+
+
+## Error Handling
+- **Role selection failure**: Default to `product-manager` with explanation
+- **Agent execution failure**: Agent-specific retry with minimal dependencies
+- **Template loading issues**: Agent handles graceful degradation
+- **Synthesis conflicts**: Synthesis agent highlights disagreements without resolution
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### Agent Autonomy Excellence
+- **Single role focus**: Each agent handles exactly one role independently
+- **Self-contained execution**: Agent manages own context, validation, and output
+- **Parallel processing**: Multiple agents can execute simultaneously
+- **Complete ownership**: Agent produces entire role-specific analysis package
+
+### Minimal Coordination Excellence
+- **Lightweight handoff**: Only topic and role assignment provided
+- **Agent self-management**: Agents handle their own workflow and validation
+- **Concurrent operation**: No inter-agent dependencies enabling parallel execution
+- **Reference-based synthesis**: Post-processing integration without content duplication
+- **TodoWrite orchestration**: Progress tracking and workflow control throughout entire process

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-squeeze.md

@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+---
+name: auto-squeeze
+description: Orchestrate 3-phase brainstorming workflow by executing commands sequentially
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "<topic>"
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for coordinated brainstorming"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Build real-time collaboration feature"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Implement secure authentication system"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Brainstorm Auto-Squeeze Command
+
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute brainstorming commands in sequence (artifacts → roles → synthesis), auto-select relevant roles, and ensure complete brainstorming workflow execution.
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. Initialize TodoWrite → Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) → Validate framework → Update TodoWrite
+2. Select 2-3 relevant roles → Display selection → Execute Phase 2 (role analyses) → Update TodoWrite
+3. Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) → Validate outputs → Return summary
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
+2. **Auto-Select Roles**: Analyze topic keywords to select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
+3. **Display Selection**: Show selected roles to user before execution
+4. **Sequential Execution**: Execute role commands one by one, not in parallel
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until synthesis completes
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every command completion
+
+## 3-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Framework Generation
+
+**Step 1.1: Role Selection**
+Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic below)
+
+**Step 1.2: Generate Role-Specific Framework**
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"[topic]\" --roles \"[role1,role2,role3]\"")`
+
+**Input**: Selected roles from step 1.1
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify topic-framework.md created with role-specific sections
+
+**Validation**:
+- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md` exists
+- Contains sections for each selected role
+- Includes cross-role integration points
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, mark "Display selected roles" as in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution
+
+**Step 2.1: Role Selection**
+Use keyword analysis to auto-select 2-3 roles:
+
+**Role Selection Logic**:
+- **Technical/Architecture keywords**: `architecture|system|performance|database|api|backend|scalability`
+  → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
+- **UI/UX keywords**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|frontend|experience`
+  → ui-designer, ux-expert
+- **Product/Business keywords**: `product|feature|business|workflow|process|customer`
+  → product-manager, product-owner
+- **Agile/Delivery keywords**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery`
+  → scrum-master, product-owner
+- **Domain Expertise keywords**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation`
+  → subject-matter-expert
+- **Default**: product-manager (if no clear match)
+
+**Selection Rules**:
+- Maximum 3 roles
+- Select most relevant role first based on strongest keyword match
+- Include complementary perspectives (e.g., if system-architect selected, also consider security-expert)
+
+**Step 2.2: Display Selected Roles**
+Show selection to user before execution:
+```
+Selected roles for analysis:
+- ui-designer (UI/UX perspective)
+- system-architect (Technical architecture)
+- security-expert (Security considerations)
+```
+
+**Step 2.3: Execute Role Commands Sequentially**
+Execute each selected role command one by one:
+
+**Commands**:
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:system-architect")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:data-architect")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-manager")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-owner")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert")`
+- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:test-strategist")`
+
+**Validation** (after each role):
+- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md` exists
+- Contains role-specific analysis
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark each role task completed after execution, start next role as in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis")`
+
+**Validation**:
+- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md` exists
+- Contains cross-references to role analyses using @ notation
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+Brainstorming complete for topic: [topic]
+Framework: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md
+Roles analyzed: [role1], [role2], [role3]
+Synthesis: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize (before Phase 1)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
+  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
+  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
+  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
+  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
+  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
+  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
+]})
+
+// After displaying roles
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
+  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
+  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
+  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
+]})
+
+// Continue pattern for each role and synthesis...
+```
+
+## Data Flow
+
+```
+User Input (topic)
+    ↓
+Role Selection (analyze topic keywords)
+    ↓ Output: 2-3 selected roles (e.g., ui-designer, system-architect, security-expert)
+    ↓
+Phase 1: artifacts "topic" --roles "role1,role2,role3"
+    ↓ Input: topic + selected roles
+    ↓ Output: role-specific topic-framework.md
+    ↓
+Display: Show selected roles to user
+    ↓
+Phase 2: Execute each role command sequentially
+    ↓ Role 1 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
+    ↓ Role 2 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
+    ↓ Role 3 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
+    ↓
+Phase 3: synthesis
+    ↓ Input: role-specific framework + all role analyses
+    ↓ Output: synthesis-report.md with role-targeted insights
+    ↓
+Return summary to user
+```
+
+**Session Context**: All commands use active brainstorming session, sharing:
+- Role-specific topic framework
+- Role-targeted analyses
+- Cross-role integration points
+- Synthesis with role-specific insights
+
+**Key Improvement**: Framework is generated with roles parameter, ensuring all discussion points are relevant to selected roles
+
+## Role Selection Examples
+
+### Example 1: UI-Focused Topic
+**Topic**: "Redesign user authentication interface"
+**Keywords detected**: user, interface, design
+**Selected roles**:
+- ui-designer (primary: UI/UX match)
+- ux-expert (secondary: user experience)
+- subject-matter-expert (complementary: auth standards)
+
+### Example 2: Architecture Topic
+**Topic**: "Design scalable microservices architecture"
+**Keywords detected**: architecture, scalable, system
+**Selected roles**:
+- system-architect (primary: architecture match)
+- data-architect (secondary: scalability/data)
+- subject-matter-expert (complementary: domain expertise)
+
+### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
+**Topic**: "Optimize team sprint planning and delivery process"
+**Keywords detected**: sprint, team, delivery, process
+**Selected roles**:
+- scrum-master (primary: agile process match)
+- product-owner (secondary: backlog/delivery focus)
+- product-manager (complementary: product strategy)
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Framework Generation Failure**: Stop workflow, report error, do not proceed to role selection
+- **Role Analysis Failure**: Log failure, continue with remaining roles, note in final summary
+- **Synthesis Failure**: Retry once, if still fails report partial completion with available analyses
+- **Session Error**: Report session issue, prompt user to check session status
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/
+├── topic-framework.md          # Phase 1 output
+├── [role1]/
+│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 1)
+├── [role2]/
+│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 2)
+├── [role3]/
+│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 3)
+└── synthesis-report.md        # Phase 3 output
+```
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+✅ Initialize TodoWrite with framework + display + N roles + synthesis tasks
+✅ Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) immediately
+✅ Validate topic-framework.md exists
+✅ Analyze topic keywords for role selection
+✅ Auto-select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
+✅ Display selected roles to user with rationale
+✅ Execute each role command sequentially
+✅ Validate each role's analysis.md after execution
+✅ Update TodoWrite after each role completion
+✅ Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) after all roles complete
+✅ Validate synthesis-report.md exists
+✅ Return summary with all generated files

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto.md

@@ -1,245 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto
-description: Intelligent brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and guided context gathering
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto "<topic>"
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto "Implement secure authentication system"
-allowed-tools: Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Brainstorm Auto Command
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:auto "<topic>"
-```
-
-## Role Selection Logic
-- **Technical & Architecture**: `architecture|system|performance|database|security` → system-architect, data-architect, security-expert
-- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature` → ui-designer, user-researcher, product-manager
-- **Business & Process**: `business|process|workflow|cost|innovation|testing` → business-analyst, innovation-lead, test-strategist
-- **Multi-role**: Complex topics automatically select 2-3 complementary roles
-- **Default**: `product-manager` if no clear match
-
-**Template Loading**: `bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role-name>.md))`
-**Template Source**: `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
-**Available Roles**: business-analyst, data-architect, feature-planner, innovation-lead, product-manager, security-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, user-researcher
-
-**Example**:
-```bash
-bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/system-architect.md))
-bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ui-designer.md))
-ls ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/  # Show all available roles
-```
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Analysis & Planning Process
-The command performs dedicated role analysis through:
-
-**0. Session Management** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **MCP Tools Integration**: Use Code Index for codebase context, Exa for external insights
-- **Active session detection**: Check `.workflow/.active-*` markers
-- **Session selection**: Prompt user if multiple active sessions found
-- **Auto-creation**: Create `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Context isolation**: Each session maintains independent brainstorming state
-
-**1. Role Selection & Template Loading**
-- **Keyword analysis**: Extract topic keywords and map to planning roles
-- **Template loading**: Load role templates via `bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role>.md))`
-- **Role validation**: Verify against `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
-- **Multi-role detection**: Select 1-3 complementary roles based on topic complexity
-
-**2. Sequential Role Processing** ⚠️ CRITICAL ARCHITECTURE
-- **One Role = One Agent**: Each role gets dedicated conceptual-planning-agent
-- **Context gathering**: Role-specific questioning with validation
-- **Agent submission**: Complete context handoff to single-role agents
-- **Progress tracking**: Real-time TodoWrite updates per role
-
-**3. Analysis Artifacts Generated**
-- **Role contexts**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/[role]-context.md` - User responses per role
-- **Agent outputs**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md` - Dedicated role analysis
-- **Session metadata**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/auto-session.json` - Agent assignments and validation
-- **Synthesis**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/synthesis/integrated-analysis.md` - Multi-role integration
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Dedicated Agent Architecture ⚠️ CRITICAL
-Agents receive dedicated role assignments with complete context isolation:
-
-```json
-"agent_assignment": {
-  "role": "system-architect",
-  "agent_id": "conceptual-planning-agent-system-architect",
-  "context_source": ".workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/system-architect-context.md",
-  "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/system-architect/",
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_role_template",
-        "action": "Load system-architect planning template",
-        "command": "bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/system-architect.md))",
-        "output_to": "role_template"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_user_context",
-        "action": "Load user responses and context for role analysis",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/system-architect-context.md)",
-        "output_to": "user_context"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_content_analysis",
-        "action": "Load existing content analysis documents if available",
-        "command": "bash(find .workflow/*/.brainstorming/ -name '*.md' -path '*/analysis/*' -o -name 'content-analysis.md' | head -5 | xargs cat 2>/dev/null || echo 'No content analysis found')",
-        "output_to": "content_analysis"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_session_metadata",
-        "action": "Load session metadata and previous analysis state",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/auto-session.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')",
-        "output_to": "session_metadata"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Execute dedicated system-architect conceptual analysis for: [topic]",
-      "role_focus": "system-architect",
-      "user_context": "Direct user responses from context gathering phase",
-      "deliverables": "conceptual_analysis, strategic_recommendations, role_perspective"
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Context Accumulation & Role Isolation**:
-1. **Role template loading**: Planning role template with domain expertise via CLI
-2. **User context loading**: Direct user responses and context from interactive questioning
-3. **Content analysis integration**: Existing analysis documents and session metadata
-4. **Context validation**: Minimum response requirements with re-prompting
-5. **Conceptual analysis**: Role-specific perspective on topic without implementation details
-6. **Agent delegation**: Complete context handoff to dedicated conceptual-planning-agent with all references
-
-**Content Sources**:
-- Role templates: `bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role>.md))` from `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
-- User responses: `bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/<role>-context.md)` from interactive questioning phase
-- Content analysis: `bash(find .workflow/*/.brainstorming/ -name '*.md' -path '*/analysis/*')` existing analysis documents
-- Session metadata: `bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/auto-session.json)` for analysis state and context
-- Conceptual focus: Strategic and planning perspective without technical implementation
-
-**Trigger Conditions**: Topic analysis matches role domains, user provides adequate context responses, role template successfully loaded
-
-### Role Processing Standards
-
-**Core Principles**:
-1. **Sequential Processing** - Complete each role fully before proceeding to next
-2. **Context Validation** - Ensure adequate detail before agent submission
-3. **Dedicated Assignment** - One conceptual-planning-agent per role
-4. **Progress Tracking** - Real-time TodoWrite updates for role processing stages
-
-**Implementation Rules**:
-- **Maximum 3 roles**: Auto-selected based on topic complexity and domain overlap
-- **Context validation**: Minimum response length and completeness checks
-- **Agent isolation**: Each agent receives only role-specific context
-- **Error recovery**: Role-specific validation and retry logic
-
-**Role Question Templates**:
-- **system-architect**: Scale requirements, integration needs, technology constraints, non-functional requirements
-- **security-expert**: Sensitive data types, compliance requirements, threat concerns, auth/authz needs
-- **ui-designer**: User personas, platform support, design guidelines, accessibility requirements
-- **product-manager**: Business objectives, stakeholders, success metrics, timeline constraints
-- **data-architect**: Data types, volume projections, compliance needs, analytics requirements
-
-### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before role processing
-- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active brainstorming sessions
-- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
-- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session for all role processing
-- **Context preservation**: Each role's context and agent output stored in session directory
-- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent brainstorming state and role assignments
-
-## Document Generation
-
-**Workflow**: Interactive Discussion → Topic Decomposition → Role Selection → Context Gathering → Agent Delegation → Documentation → Synthesis
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **discussion-summary.md**: Main conversation points and key insights from interactive discussion
-- **component-analysis.md**: Detailed breakdown of topic components from discussion phase
-- **auto-session.json**: Agent assignments, context validation, completion tracking
-- **[role]-context.md**: User responses per role with question-answer pairs
-
-**Auto-Created (per role)**:
-- **[role]/analysis.md**: Main role analysis from dedicated agent
-- **[role]/recommendations.md**: Role-specific recommendations
-- **[role]-template.md**: Loaded role planning template
-
-**Auto-Created (multi-role)**:
-- **synthesis/integrated-analysis.md**: Cross-role integration and consensus analysis
-- **synthesis/consensus-matrix.md**: Agreement/disagreement analysis
-- **synthesis/priority-recommendations.md**: Prioritized action items
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
-├── discussion-summary.md       # Main conversation and insights
-├── component-analysis.md       # Detailed topic breakdown
-├── auto-session.json           # Session metadata and agent tracking
-├── system-architect-context.md # User responses for system-architect
-├── system-architect-template.md# Loaded role template
-├── system-architect/           # Dedicated agent outputs
-│   ├── analysis.md
-│   ├── recommendations.md
-│   └── deliverables/
-├── ui-designer-context.md      # User responses for ui-designer
-├── ui-designer/                # Dedicated agent outputs
-│   └── analysis.md
-└── synthesis/                  # Multi-role integration
-    ├── integrated-analysis.md
-    ├── consensus-matrix.md
-    └── priority-recommendations.md
-```
-
-## Reference Information
-
-### Role Processing Schema (Sequential Architecture)
-Each role processing follows dedicated agent pattern:
-- **role**: Selected planning role name
-- **template**: Loaded from cli-templates/planning-roles/
-- **context**: User responses with validation
-- **agent**: Dedicated conceptual-planning-agent instance
-- **output**: Role-specific analysis directory
-
-### File Structure Reference
-**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-**Role Templates**: @~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/
-
-### Execution Integration
-Documents created for synthesis and action planning:
-- **auto-session.json**: Agent tracking and session metadata
-- **[role]-context.md**: Context loading for role analysis
-- **[role]/analysis.md**: Role-specific analysis outputs
-- **synthesis/**: Multi-role integration for comprehensive planning
-
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Role selection failure**: Default to `product-manager` with explanation
-- **Context validation failure**: Re-prompt with minimum requirements
-- **Agent execution failure**: Role-specific retry with corrected context
-- **Template loading issues**: Graceful degradation with fallback questions
-- **Multi-role conflicts**: Synthesis agent handles disagreement resolution
-
-## Quality Standards
-
-### Dedicated Agent Excellence
-- **Single role focus**: Each agent handles exactly one role - no multi-role assignments
-- **Complete context**: Each agent receives comprehensive role-specific context
-- **Sequential processing**: Roles processed one at a time with full validation
-- **Dedicated output**: Each agent produces role-specific analysis and deliverables
-
-### Context Collection Excellence
-- **Role-specific questioning**: Targeted questions for each role's domain expertise
-- **Context validation**: Verification before agent submission to ensure completeness
-- **User guidance**: Clear explanations of role perspective and question importance
-- **Response quality**: Minimum response requirements with re-prompting for insufficient detail

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/business-analyst.md

@@ -1,273 +0,0 @@
----
-name: business-analyst
-description: Business analyst perspective brainstorming for process optimization and business efficiency analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:business-analyst <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from business analysis perspective"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:business-analyst "workflow automation opportunities"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:business-analyst "business process optimization"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:business-analyst "cost reduction initiatives"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
----
-
-## 📊 **Role Overview: Business Analyst**
-
-### Role Definition
-Business process expert responsible for analyzing workflows, identifying requirements, and optimizing business operations to maximize value and efficiency.
-
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **Process Analysis**: Analyze existing business processes for efficiency and improvement opportunities
-- **Requirements Analysis**: Identify and define business requirements and functional specifications
-- **Value Assessment**: Evaluate solution business value and return on investment
-- **Change Management**: Plan and manage business process changes
-
-### Focus Areas
-- **Process Optimization**: Workflows, automation opportunities, efficiency improvements
-- **Data Analysis**: Business metrics, KPI design, performance measurement
-- **Cost-Benefit**: ROI analysis, cost optimization, value creation
-- **Risk Management**: Business risks, compliance requirements, change risks
-
-### Success Metrics
-- Process efficiency improvements (time/cost reduction)
-- Requirements clarity and completeness
-- Stakeholder satisfaction levels
-- ROI achievement and value delivery
-
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. Business Process Analysis**
-- What are the bottlenecks and inefficiencies in current business processes?
-- Which processes can be automated or simplified?
-- What are the obstacles in cross-departmental collaboration?
-
-**2. Business Requirements Identification**
-- What are the core needs of stakeholders?
-- What are the business objectives and success metrics?
-- How should functional and non-functional requirements be prioritized?
-
-**3. Value and Benefit Analysis**
-- What is the expected business value of the solution?
-- How does implementation cost compare to expected benefits?
-- What are the risk assessments and mitigation strategies?
-
-**4. Implementation and Change Management**
-- How will changes impact existing processes?
-- What training and adaptation requirements exist?
-- What success metrics and monitoring mechanisms are needed?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
-```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
-```
-
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**Business Analyst Perspective Questioning**
-
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive business analyst context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-
-**1. Business Process Analysis**
-- What are the current business processes and workflows that need analysis?
-- Which departments, teams, or stakeholders are involved in these processes?
-- What are the key bottlenecks, inefficiencies, or pain points you've observed?
-- What metrics or KPIs are currently used to measure process performance?
-
-**2. Cost and Resource Analysis**
-- What are the current costs associated with these processes (time, money, resources)?
-- How much time do stakeholders spend on these activities daily/weekly?
-- What technology, tools, or systems are currently being used?
-- What budget constraints or financial targets need to be considered?
-
-**3. Business Requirements and Objectives**
-- What are the primary business objectives this analysis should achieve?
-- Who are the key stakeholders and what are their specific needs?
-- What are the success criteria and how will you measure improvement?
-- Are there any compliance, regulatory, or governance requirements?
-
-**4. Change Management and Implementation**
-- How ready is the organization for process changes?
-- What training or change management support might be needed?
-- What timeline or deadlines are we working with?
-- What potential resistance or challenges do you anticipate?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/business-analyst-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
-
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-Execute dedicated business analyst conceptual analysis for: {topic}
-
-ASSIGNED_ROLE: business-analyst
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/business-analyst/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
-
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load business-analyst planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/business-analyst.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
-
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply business analyst perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on process optimization, cost-benefit analysis, and change management
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
-
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main business analyst analysis
-- recommendations.md: Business analyst recommendations
-- deliverables/: Business analyst-specific outputs as defined in role template
-
-Embody business analyst role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
-```
-
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather business analyst context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to business-analyst-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load business-analyst planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for business-analyst role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
-```
-
-## 📊 **Output Structure**
-
-### Output Location
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/business-analyst/
-├── analysis.md                 # Main business analysis and process assessment
-├── requirements.md             # Detailed business requirements and specifications
-├── business-case.md            # Cost-benefit analysis and financial justification
-└── implementation-plan.md      # Change management and implementation strategy
-```
-
-### Document Templates
-
-#### analysis.md Structure
-```markdown
-# Business Analyst Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
-
-## Executive Summary
-[Overview of key business analysis findings and recommendations]
-
-## Current State Assessment
-### Business Process Mapping
-### Stakeholder Analysis
-### Performance Metrics Analysis
-### Pain Points and Inefficiencies
-
-## Business Requirements
-### Functional Requirements
-### Non-Functional Requirements
-### Stakeholder Needs Analysis
-### Requirements Prioritization
-
-## Process Optimization Opportunities
-### Automation Potential
-### Workflow Improvements
-### Resource Optimization
-### Quality Enhancements
-
-## Financial Analysis
-### Cost-Benefit Analysis
-### ROI Calculations
-### Budget Requirements
-### Financial Projections
-
-## Risk Assessment
-### Business Risks
-### Operational Risks
-### Mitigation Strategies
-### Contingency Planning
-
-## Implementation Strategy
-### Change Management Plan
-### Training Requirements
-### Timeline and Milestones
-### Success Metrics and KPIs
-
-## Recommendations
-### Immediate Actions (0-3 months)
-### Medium-term Initiatives (3-12 months)
-### Long-term Strategic Goals (12+ months)
-### Resource Requirements
-```
-
-## 🔄 **Session Integration**
-
-### Status Synchronization
-After analysis completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "business_analyst": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/business-analyst/",
-        "key_insights": ["process_optimization", "cost_saving", "efficiency_gain"]
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Collaboration with Other Roles
-Business analyst perspective provides to other roles:
-- **Business requirements and constraints** → Product Manager
-- **Process technology requirements** → System Architect
-- **Business process interface needs** → UI Designer
-- **Business data requirements** → Data Architect
-- **Business security requirements** → Security Expert
-
-## ✅ **Quality Standards**
-
-### Required Analysis Elements
-- [ ] Detailed business process mapping
-- [ ] Clear requirements specifications and priorities
-- [ ] Quantified cost-benefit analysis
-- [ ] Comprehensive risk assessment
-- [ ] Actionable implementation plan
-
-### Business Analysis Principles Checklist
-- [ ] Value-oriented: Focus on business value creation
-- [ ] Data-driven: Analysis based on facts and data
-- [ ] Holistic thinking: Consider entire business ecosystem
-- [ ] Risk awareness: Identify and manage various risks
-- [ ] Sustainability: Long-term maintainability and improvement
-
-### Analysis Quality Metrics
-- [ ] Requirements completeness and accuracy
-- [ ] Quantified benefits from process optimization
-- [ ] Comprehensiveness of risk assessment
-- [ ] Feasibility of implementation plan
-- [ ] Stakeholder satisfaction levels

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/data-architect.md

@@ -1,274 +1,205 @@
 ---
 name: data-architect
-description: Data architect perspective brainstorming for data modeling, flow, and analytics analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from data architecture perspective"
+description: Generate or update data-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect
   - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "user analytics data pipeline"
   - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "real-time data processing system"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "data warehouse modernization"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
-## 📊 **Role Overview: Data Architect**
+## 📊 **Data Architect Analysis Generator**
 
-### Role Definition
-Strategic data professional responsible for designing scalable, efficient data architectures that enable data-driven decision making through robust data models, processing pipelines, and analytics platforms.
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating data-architect/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from data architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **Data Model Design**: Create efficient and scalable data models and schemas
-- **Data Flow Design**: Plan data collection, processing, and storage workflows
-- **Data Quality Management**: Ensure data accuracy, completeness, and consistency
-- **Analytics and Insights**: Design data analysis and business intelligence solutions
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Data Architecture Focus**: Data models, pipelines, governance, and analytics perspective
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
-### Focus Areas
-- **Data Modeling**: Relational models, NoSQL, data warehouses, lakehouse architectures
-- **Data Pipelines**: ETL/ELT processes, real-time processing, batch processing
-- **Data Governance**: Data quality, security, privacy, compliance frameworks
-- **Analytics Platforms**: BI tools, machine learning infrastructure, reporting systems
+### Analysis Scope
+- **Data Model Design**: Efficient and scalable data models and schemas
+- **Data Flow Design**: Data collection, processing, and storage workflows
+- **Data Quality Management**: Data accuracy, completeness, and consistency
+- **Analytics and Insights**: Data analysis and business intelligence solutions
 
-### Success Metrics
-- Data quality and consistency metrics
-- Processing performance and throughput
-- Analytics accuracy and business impact
-- Data governance and compliance adherence
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. Data Requirements and Sources**
-- What data is needed to support business decisions and analytics?
-- How reliable and high-quality are the available data sources?
-- What is the balance between real-time and historical data needs?
-
-**2. Data Architecture and Storage**
-- What is the most appropriate data storage solution for requirements?
-- How should we design scalable and maintainable data models?
-- What are the optimal data partitioning and indexing strategies?
-
-**3. Data Processing and Workflows**
-- What are the performance requirements for data processing?
-- How should we design fault-tolerant and resilient data pipelines?
-- What data versioning and change management strategies are needed?
-
-**4. Analytics and Reporting**
-- How can we support diverse analytical requirements and use cases?
-- What balance between real-time dashboards and periodic reports is optimal?
-- What self-service analytics and data visualization capabilities are needed?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
 ```
 
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**Data Architect Perspective Questioning**
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
 
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive data architect context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-
-**1. Data Models and Flow Patterns**
-- What types of data will you be working with (structured, semi-structured, unstructured)?
-- What are the expected data volumes and growth projections?
-- What are the primary data sources and how frequently will data be updated?
-- Are there existing data models or schemas that need to be considered?
-
-**2. Storage Strategies and Performance**
-- What are the query performance requirements and expected response times?
-- Do you need real-time processing, batch processing, or both?
-- What are the data retention and archival requirements?
-- Are there specific compliance or regulatory requirements for data storage?
-
-**3. Analytics Requirements and Insights**
-- What types of analytics and reporting capabilities are needed?
-- Who are the primary users of the data and what are their skill levels?
-- What business intelligence or machine learning use cases need to be supported?
-- Are there specific dashboard or visualization requirements?
-
-**4. Data Governance and Quality**
-- What data quality standards and validation rules need to be implemented?
-- Who owns the data and what are the access control requirements?
-- Are there data privacy or security concerns that need to be addressed?
-- What data lineage and auditing capabilities are required?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/data-architect-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
 
 ```bash
 Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
 [FLOW_CONTROL]
 
-Execute dedicated data architect conceptual analysis for: {topic}
+Execute data-architect analysis for existing topic framework
 
+## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: data-architect
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/data-architect/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load data-architect planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/data-architect.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
 
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply data architect perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on data models, flow patterns, storage strategies, and analytics requirements
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load data-architect planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/data-architect.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
 
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main data architect analysis
-- recommendations.md: Data architect recommendations
-- deliverables/: Data architect-specific outputs as defined in role template
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
 
-Embody data architect role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from data architecture perspective
+**Role Focus**: Data models, pipelines, governance, analytics platforms
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive data architecture analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with data architecture expertise
+- Provide data model designs, pipeline architectures, and governance strategies
+- Include scalability, performance, and quality considerations
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
 ```
 
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather data architect context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to data-architect-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load data-architect planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for data-architect role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute data-architect analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing data-architect framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured data-architect analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with data-architect completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
 ```
 
-## 📊 **Output Specification**
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
 
-### Output Location
+### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
-├── analysis.md                 # Primary data architecture analysis
-├── data-model.md               # Data models, schemas, and relationships
-├── pipeline-design.md          # Data processing and ETL/ELT workflows
-└── governance-plan.md          # Data quality, security, and governance
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
 ```
 
-### Document Templates
-
-#### analysis.md Structure
+### Analysis Document Structure
 ```markdown
-# Data Architect Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
+# Data Architect Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
-## Executive Summary
-[Key data architecture findings and recommendations overview]
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: Data Architecture perspective
 
-## Current Data Landscape
-### Existing Data Sources
-### Current Data Architecture
-### Data Quality Assessment
-### Performance Bottlenecks
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with data architecture expertise]
 
-## Data Requirements Analysis
-### Business Data Needs
-### Technical Data Requirements
-### Data Volume and Growth Projections
-### Real-time vs Batch Processing Needs
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[Data architecture perspective on requirements]
 
-## Proposed Data Architecture
-### Data Model Design
-### Storage Architecture
-### Processing Pipeline Design
-### Integration Patterns
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Data model, pipeline, and storage considerations]
 
-## Data Quality and Governance
-### Data Quality Framework
-### Governance Policies
-### Security and Privacy Controls
-### Compliance Requirements
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[Data access patterns and analytics user experience]
 
-## Analytics and Reporting Strategy
-### Business Intelligence Architecture
-### Self-Service Analytics Design
-### Performance Monitoring
-### Scalability Planning
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Data migration, quality, and governance challenges]
 
-## Implementation Roadmap
-### Migration Strategy
-### Technology Stack Recommendations
-### Resource Requirements
-### Risk Mitigation Plan
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[Data quality metrics and analytics success criteria]
+
+## Data Architecture Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific data architecture recommendations and solutions]
+
+---
+*Generated by data-architect analysis addressing structured framework*
 ```
 
 ## 🔄 **Session Integration**
 
-### Status Synchronization
-Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+### Completion Status Update
 ```json
 {
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "data_architect": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/data-architect/",
-        "key_insights": ["data_model_optimization", "pipeline_architecture", "analytics_strategy"]
-      }
-    }
+  "data_architect": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
-### Cross-Role Collaboration
-Data architect perspective provides:
-- **Data Storage Requirements** → System Architect
-- **Analytics Data Requirements** → Product Manager
-- **Data Visualization Specifications** → UI Designer
-- **Data Security Framework** → Security Expert
-- **Feature Data Requirements** → Feature Planner
-
-## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
-
-### Required Architecture Elements
-- [ ] Comprehensive data model with clear relationships and constraints
-- [ ] Scalable data pipeline design with error handling and monitoring
-- [ ] Data quality framework with validation rules and metrics
-- [ ] Governance plan addressing security, privacy, and compliance
-- [ ] Analytics architecture supporting business intelligence needs
-
-### Data Architecture Principles
-- [ ] **Scalability**: Architecture can handle data volume and velocity growth
-- [ ] **Quality**: Built-in data validation, cleansing, and quality monitoring
-- [ ] **Security**: Data protection, access controls, and privacy compliance
-- [ ] **Performance**: Optimized for query performance and processing efficiency
-- [ ] **Maintainability**: Clear data lineage, documentation, and change management
-
-### Implementation Validation
-- [ ] **Technical Feasibility**: All proposed solutions are technically achievable
-- [ ] **Performance Requirements**: Architecture meets processing and query performance needs
-- [ ] **Cost Effectiveness**: Storage and processing costs are optimized and sustainable
-- [ ] **Governance Compliance**: Meets regulatory and organizational data requirements
-- [ ] **Future Readiness**: Design accommodates anticipated growth and changing needs
-
-### Data Quality Standards
-- [ ] **Accuracy**: Data validation rules ensure correctness and consistency
-- [ ] **Completeness**: Strategies for handling missing data and ensuring coverage
-- [ ] **Timeliness**: Data freshness requirements met through appropriate processing
-- [ ] **Consistency**: Data definitions and formats standardized across systems
-- [ ] **Lineage**: Complete data lineage tracking from source to consumption
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Data architecture insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/feature-planner.md

@@ -1,273 +0,0 @@
----
-name: feature-planner
-description: Feature planner perspective brainstorming for feature development and planning analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:feature-planner <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from feature planning perspective"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:feature-planner "user dashboard enhancement"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:feature-planner "mobile app feature roadmap"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:feature-planner "integration capabilities planning"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
----
-
-## 🔧 **Role Overview: Feature Planner**
-
-### Role Definition
-Feature development specialist responsible for transforming business requirements into actionable feature specifications, managing development priorities, and ensuring successful feature delivery through strategic planning and execution.
-
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **Feature Specification**: Transform business requirements into detailed feature specifications
-- **Development Planning**: Create development roadmaps and manage feature priorities
-- **Quality Assurance**: Design testing strategies and acceptance criteria
-- **Delivery Management**: Plan feature releases and manage implementation timelines
-
-### Focus Areas
-- **Feature Design**: User stories, acceptance criteria, feature specifications
-- **Development Planning**: Sprint planning, milestones, dependency management
-- **Quality Assurance**: Testing strategies, quality gates, acceptance processes
-- **Release Management**: Release planning, version control, change management
-
-### Success Metrics
-- Feature delivery on time and within scope
-- Quality standards and acceptance criteria met
-- User satisfaction with delivered features
-- Development team productivity and efficiency
-
-## 🧠 **分析框架**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. Feature Requirements and Scope**
-- What are the core feature requirements and user stories?
-- How should MVP and full feature versions be planned?
-- What cross-feature dependencies and integration requirements exist?
-
-**2. Implementation Complexity and Feasibility**
-- What is the technical implementation complexity and what challenges exist?
-- What extensions or modifications to existing systems are required?
-- What third-party services and API integrations are needed?
-
-**3. Development Resources and Timeline**
-- What are the development effort estimates and time projections?
-- What skills and team configurations are required?
-- What development risks exist and how can they be mitigated?
-
-**4. Testing and Quality Assurance**
-- What testing strategies and test case designs are needed?
-- What quality standards and acceptance criteria should be defined?
-- What user acceptance and feedback mechanisms are required?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
-```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
-```
-
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**Feature Planner Perspective Questioning**
-
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive feature planner context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-
-**1. Implementation Complexity and Scope**
-- What is the scope and complexity of the features you want to plan?
-- Are there existing features or systems that need to be extended or integrated?
-- What are the technical constraints or requirements that need to be considered?
-- How do these features fit into the overall product roadmap?
-
-**2. Dependency Mapping and Integration**
-- What other features, systems, or teams does this depend on?
-- Are there any external APIs, services, or third-party integrations required?
-- What are the data dependencies and how will data flow between components?
-- What are the potential blockers or risks that could impact development?
-
-**3. Risk Assessment and Mitigation**
-- What are the main technical, business, or timeline risks?
-- Are there any unknowns or areas that need research or prototyping?
-- What fallback plans or alternative approaches should be considered?
-- How will quality and testing be ensured throughout development?
-
-**4. Technical Feasibility and Resource Planning**
-- What is the estimated development effort and timeline?
-- What skills, expertise, or team composition is needed?
-- Are there any specific technologies, tools, or frameworks required?
-- What are the performance, scalability, or maintenance considerations?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/feature-planner-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
-
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-Execute dedicated feature planner conceptual analysis for: {topic}
-
-ASSIGNED_ROLE: feature-planner
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/feature-planner/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
-
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load feature-planner planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/feature-planner.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
-
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply feature planner perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on implementation complexity, dependency mapping, risk assessment, and technical feasibility
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
-
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main feature planner analysis
-- recommendations.md: Feature planner recommendations
-- deliverables/: Feature planner-specific outputs as defined in role template
-
-Embody feature planner role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
-```
-
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather feature planner context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to feature-planner-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load feature-planner planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for feature-planner role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
-```
-
-## 📊 **输出结构**
-
-### 保存位置
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/feature-planner/
-├── analysis.md                 # 主要功能分析和规范
-├── user-stories.md             # 详细用户故事和验收标准
-├── development-plan.md         # 开发时间线和资源规划
-└── testing-strategy.md         # 质量保证和测试方法
-```
-
-### 文档模板
-
-#### analysis.md 结构
-```markdown
-# Feature Planner Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
-
-## Executive Summary
-[核心功能规划发现和建议概述]
-
-## Feature Requirements Overview
-### Core Feature Specifications
-### User Story Summary
-### Feature Scope and Boundaries
-### Success Criteria and KPIs
-
-## Feature Architecture Design
-### Feature Components and Modules
-### Integration Points and Dependencies
-### APIs and Data Interfaces
-### Configuration and Customization
-
-## Development Planning
-### Effort Estimation and Complexity
-### Development Phases and Milestones
-### Resource Requirements
-### Risk Assessment and Mitigation
-
-## Quality Assurance Strategy
-### Testing Approach and Coverage
-### Performance and Scalability Testing
-### User Acceptance Testing Plan
-### Quality Gates and Standards
-
-## Delivery and Release Strategy
-### Release Planning and Versioning
-### Deployment Strategy
-### Feature Rollout Plan
-### Post-Release Support
-
-## Feature Prioritization
-### Priority Matrix (High/Medium/Low)
-### Business Value Assessment
-### Development Complexity Analysis
-### Recommended Implementation Order
-
-## Implementation Roadmap
-### Phase 1: Core Features (Weeks 1-4)
-### Phase 2: Enhanced Features (Weeks 5-8)
-### Phase 3: Advanced Features (Weeks 9-12)
-### Continuous Improvement Plan
-```
-
-## 🔄 **会话集成**
-
-### 状态同步
-分析完成后，更新 `workflow-session.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "feature_planner": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/feature-planner/",
-        "key_insights": ["feature_specification", "development_timeline", "quality_requirement"]
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 与其他角色的协作
-功能规划师视角为其他角色提供：
-- **功能优先级和规划** → Product Manager
-- **技术实现需求** → System Architect
-- **界面功能要求** → UI Designer
-- **数据功能需求** → Data Architect
-- **功能安全需求** → Security Expert
-
-## ✅ **质量标准**
-
-### 必须包含的规划元素
-- [ ] 详细的功能规范和用户故事
-- [ ] 现实的开发时间估算
-- [ ] 全面的测试策略
-- [ ] 明确的质量标准
-- [ ] 可执行的发布计划
-
-### 功能规划原则检查
-- [ ] 用户价值：每个功能都有明确的用户价值
-- [ ] 可测试性：所有功能都有验收标准
-- [ ] 可维护性：考虑长期维护和扩展
-- [ ] 可交付性：计划符合团队能力和资源
-- [ ] 可测量性：有明确的成功指标
-
-### 交付质量评估
-- [ ] 功能完整性和正确性
-- [ ] 性能和稳定性指标
-- [ ] 用户体验和满意度
-- [ ] 代码质量和可维护性
-- [ ] 文档完整性和准确性

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/innovation-lead.md

@@ -1,273 +0,0 @@
----
-name: innovation-lead
-description: Innovation lead perspective brainstorming for emerging technologies and future opportunities analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:innovation-lead <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from innovation and emerging technology perspective"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:innovation-lead "AI integration opportunities"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:innovation-lead "future technology trends"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:innovation-lead "disruptive innovation strategy"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
----
-
-## 🚀 **Role Overview: Innovation Lead**
-
-### Role Definition
-Visionary technology strategist responsible for identifying emerging technology trends, evaluating disruptive innovation opportunities, and designing future-ready solutions that create competitive advantage and drive market transformation.
-
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **Trend Identification**: Identify and analyze emerging technology trends and market opportunities
-- **Innovation Strategy**: Develop innovation roadmaps and technology development strategies
-- **Technology Assessment**: Evaluate new technology application potential and feasibility
-- **Future Planning**: Design forward-looking product and service concepts
-
-### Focus Areas
-- **Emerging Technologies**: AI, blockchain, IoT, AR/VR, quantum computing, and other frontier technologies
-- **Market Trends**: Industry transformation, user behavior evolution, business model innovation
-- **Innovation Opportunities**: Disruptive innovation, blue ocean markets, technology convergence opportunities
-- **Future Vision**: Long-term technology roadmaps, proof of concepts, prototype development
-
-### Success Metrics
-- Innovation impact and market differentiation
-- Technology adoption rates and competitive advantage
-- Future readiness and strategic positioning
-- Breakthrough opportunity identification and validation
-
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. Emerging Trends and Technology Opportunities**
-- Which emerging technologies will have the greatest impact on our industry?
-- What is the technology maturity level and adoption timeline?
-- What new opportunities does technology convergence create?
-
-**2. Disruption Potential and Innovation Assessment**
-- What is the potential for disruptive innovation and its impact?
-- What innovation opportunities exist within current solutions?
-- What unmet market needs and demands exist?
-
-**3. Competitive Advantage and Market Analysis**
-- What are competitors' innovation strategies and directions?
-- What market gaps and blue ocean opportunities exist?
-- What technological barriers and first-mover advantages are available?
-
-**4. Implementation and Risk Assessment**
-- What is the feasibility and risk of technology implementation?
-- What are the investment requirements and expected returns?
-- What organizational innovation capabilities and adaptability are needed?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
-```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
-```
-
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**Innovation Lead Perspective Questioning**
-
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive innovation lead context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-
-**1. Emerging Trends and Future Technologies**
-- What emerging technologies or trends do you think will be most relevant to this topic?
-- Are there any specific industries or markets you want to explore for innovation opportunities?
-- What time horizon are you considering (near-term, medium-term, long-term disruption)?
-- Are there any particular technology domains you want to focus on (AI, IoT, blockchain, etc.)?
-
-**2. Innovation Opportunities and Market Potential**
-- What current limitations or pain points could be addressed through innovation?
-- Are there any unmet market needs or underserved segments you're aware of?
-- What would disruptive success look like in this context?
-- Are there cross-industry innovations that could be applied to this domain?
-
-**3. Disruption Potential and Competitive Landscape**
-- Who are the current market leaders and what are their innovation strategies?
-- What startup activity or venture capital investment trends are you seeing?
-- Are there any potential platform shifts or ecosystem changes on the horizon?
-- What would make a solution truly differentiated in the marketplace?
-
-**4. Implementation and Strategic Considerations**
-- What organizational capabilities or partnerships would be needed for innovation?
-- Are there regulatory, technical, or market barriers to consider?
-- What level of risk tolerance exists for breakthrough vs. incremental innovation?
-- How important is first-mover advantage versus fast-follower strategies?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/innovation-lead-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
-
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-Execute dedicated innovation lead conceptual analysis for: {topic}
-
-ASSIGNED_ROLE: innovation-lead
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/innovation-lead/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
-
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load innovation-lead planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/innovation-lead.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
-
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply innovation lead perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on emerging trends, disruption potential, competitive advantage, and future opportunities
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
-
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main innovation lead analysis
-- recommendations.md: Innovation lead recommendations
-- deliverables/: Innovation lead-specific outputs as defined in role template
-
-Embody innovation lead role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
-```
-
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather innovation lead context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to innovation-lead-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load innovation-lead planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for innovation-lead role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
-```
-
-## 📊 **输出结构**
-
-### 保存位置
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/innovation-lead/
-├── analysis.md                 # 主要创新分析和机会评估
-├── technology-roadmap.md       # 技术趋势和未来场景
-├── innovation-concepts.md      # 突破性想法和概念开发
-└── strategy-implementation.md  # 创新策略和执行计划
-```
-
-### 文档模板
-
-#### analysis.md 结构
-```markdown
-# Innovation Lead Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
-
-## Executive Summary
-[核心创新机会和战略建议概述]
-
-## Technology Landscape Assessment
-### Emerging Technologies Overview
-### Technology Maturity Analysis
-### Convergence Opportunities
-### Disruptive Potential Assessment
-
-## Innovation Opportunity Analysis
-### Market Whitespace Identification
-### Unmet Needs and Pain Points
-### Disruptive Innovation Potential
-### Blue Ocean Opportunities
-
-## Competitive Intelligence
-### Competitor Innovation Strategies
-### Patent Landscape Analysis
-### Startup Ecosystem Insights
-### Investment and Funding Trends
-
-## Future Scenarios and Trends
-### Short-term Innovations (0-2 years)
-### Medium-term Disruptions (2-5 years)
-### Long-term Transformations (5+ years)
-### Wild Card Scenarios
-
-## Innovation Concepts
-### Breakthrough Ideas
-### Proof-of-Concept Opportunities
-### Platform Innovation Possibilities
-### Ecosystem Partnership Ideas
-
-## Strategic Recommendations
-### Innovation Investment Priorities
-### Technology Partnership Strategy
-### Capability Building Requirements
-### Risk Mitigation Approaches
-
-## Implementation Roadmap
-### Innovation Pilot Programs
-### Technology Validation Milestones
-### Scaling and Commercialization Plan
-### Success Metrics and KPIs
-```
-
-## 🔄 **会话集成**
-
-### 状态同步
-分析完成后，更新 `workflow-session.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "innovation_lead": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/innovation-lead/",
-        "key_insights": ["breakthrough_opportunity", "emerging_technology", "disruptive_potential"]
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 与其他角色的协作
-创新领导视角为其他角色提供：
-- **创新机会和趋势** → Product Manager
-- **新技术可行性** → System Architect
-- **未来用户体验趋势** → UI Designer
-- **新兴数据技术** → Data Architect
-- **创新安全挑战** → Security Expert
-
-## ✅ **质量标准**
-
-### 必须包含的创新元素
-- [ ] 全面的技术趋势分析
-- [ ] 明确的创新机会识别
-- [ ] 具体的概念验证方案
-- [ ] 现实的实施路线图
-- [ ] 前瞻性的风险评估
-
-### 创新思维原则检查
-- [ ] 前瞻性：关注未来3-10年趋势
-- [ ] 颠覆性：寻找破坏性创新机会
-- [ ] 系统性：考虑技术生态系统影响
-- [ ] 可行性：平衡愿景与现实可能
-- [ ] 差异化：创造独特竞争优势
-
-### 创新价值评估
-- [ ] 市场影响的潜在规模
-- [ ] 技术可行性和成熟度
-- [ ] 竞争优势的可持续性
-- [ ] 投资回报的时间框架
-- [ ] 组织实施的复杂度

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-manager.md

@@ -1,248 +1,205 @@
 ---
 name: product-manager
-description: Product manager perspective brainstorming for user needs and business value analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from product management perspective"
+description: Generate or update product-manager/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager
   - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "user authentication redesign"
   - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "mobile app performance optimization"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "feature prioritization strategy"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
-## 🎯 **Role Overview: Product Manager**
+## 🎯 **Product Manager Analysis Generator**
 
-### Role Definition
-Strategic product leader focused on maximizing user value and business impact through data-driven decisions and market-oriented thinking.
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating product-manager/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from product strategy perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **User Needs Analysis**: Identify and validate genuine user problems and requirements
-- **Business Value Assessment**: Quantify commercial impact and return on investment
-- **Market Positioning**: Analyze competitive landscape and identify opportunities
-- **Product Strategy**: Develop roadmaps, priorities, and go-to-market approaches
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Product Strategy Focus**: User needs, business value, and market positioning
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
-### Focus Areas
-- **User Experience**: Journey mapping, satisfaction metrics, conversion optimization
-- **Business Metrics**: ROI, user growth, retention rates, revenue impact
-- **Market Dynamics**: Competitive analysis, differentiation, market trends
-- **Product Lifecycle**: Feature evolution, technical debt management, scalability
+### Analysis Scope
+- **User Needs Analysis**: Target users, problems, and value propositions
+- **Business Impact Assessment**: ROI, metrics, and commercial outcomes
+- **Market Positioning**: Competitive analysis and differentiation
+- **Product Strategy**: Roadmaps, priorities, and go-to-market approaches
 
-### Success Metrics
-- User satisfaction scores and engagement metrics
-- Business KPIs (revenue, growth, retention)
-- Market share and competitive positioning
-- Product adoption and feature utilization rates
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. User Value Assessment**
-- What genuine user problem does this solve?
-- Who are the target users and what are their core needs?
-- How does this improve the user experience measurably?
-
-**2. Business Impact Evaluation**
-- What are the expected business outcomes?
-- How does the cost-benefit analysis look?
-- What impact will this have on existing workflows?
-
-**3. Market Opportunity Analysis**
-- What gaps exist in current market solutions?
-- What is our unique competitive advantage?
-- Is the timing right for this initiative?
-
-**4. Execution Feasibility**
-- What resources and timeline are required?
-- What are the technical and market risks?
-- Do we have the right team capabilities?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
 ```
 
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**Product Manager Perspective Questioning**
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
 
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive product management context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-1. **Business Objectives & Metrics**
-   - Primary business goals and success metrics?
-   - Revenue impact expectations and timeline?
-   - Key stakeholders and decision makers?
-
-2. **Target Users & Market**
-   - Primary user segments and personas?
-   - User pain points and current solutions?
-   - Competitive landscape and differentiation needs?
-
-3. **Product Strategy & Scope**
-   - Feature priorities and user value propositions?
-   - Resource constraints and timeline expectations?
-   - Integration with existing product ecosystem?
-
-4. **Success Criteria & Risk Assessment**
-   - How will success be measured and validated?
-   - Market and technical risks to consider?
-   - Go-to-market strategy requirements?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/product-manager-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
 
 ```bash
 Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
 [FLOW_CONTROL]
 
-Execute dedicated product-manager conceptual analysis for: {topic}
+Execute product-manager analysis for existing topic framework
 
+## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: product-manager
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/product-manager/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load product-manager planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/product-manager.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
 
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply product-manager perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on user value, business impact, and market positioning
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load product-manager planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/product-manager.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
 
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main product management analysis
-- recommendations.md: Product strategy recommendations
-- deliverables/: Product-specific outputs as defined in role template
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
 
-Embody product-manager role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from product strategy perspective
+**Role Focus**: User value, business impact, market positioning, product strategy
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive product strategy analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with product management expertise
+- Provide actionable business strategies and user value propositions
+- Include market analysis and competitive positioning insights
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
 ```
 
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather product manager context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to product-manager-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load product-manager planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for product-manager role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute product-manager analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing product-manager framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured product-manager analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with product-manager completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
 ```
 
-## 📊 **Output Specification**
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
 
-### Output Location
+### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
-├── analysis.md                 # Primary product management analysis
-├── business-case.md            # Business justification and metrics
-├── user-research.md            # User research and market insights
-└── roadmap.md                  # Strategic recommendations and timeline
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
 ```
 
-### Document Templates
-
-#### analysis.md Structure
+### Analysis Document Structure
 ```markdown
-# Product Manager Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
+# Product Manager Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
-## Executive Summary
-[Key findings and recommendations overview]
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: Product Strategy perspective
 
-## User Needs Analysis
-### Target User Segments
-### Core Problems Identified
-### User Journey Mapping
-### Priority Requirements
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with product management expertise]
 
-## Business Impact Assessment
-### Revenue Impact
-### Cost Analysis
-### ROI Projections
-### Risk Assessment
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[Product strategy perspective on user needs and requirements]
 
-## Competitive Analysis
-### Market Position
-### Differentiation Opportunities
-### Competitive Advantages
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Business and technical feasibility considerations]
 
-## Strategic Recommendations
-### Immediate Actions (0-3 months)
-### Medium-term Initiatives (3-12 months)
-### Long-term Vision (12+ months)
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[User value proposition and market positioning analysis]
+
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Business execution and go-to-market considerations]
+
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[Product success metrics and business KPIs]
+
+## Product Strategy Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific product management strategies and business solutions]
+
+---
+*Generated by product-manager analysis addressing structured framework*
 ```
 
 ## 🔄 **Session Integration**
 
-### Status Synchronization
-Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+### Completion Status Update
 ```json
 {
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "product_manager": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/product-manager/",
-        "key_insights": ["user_value_proposition", "business_impact_assessment", "strategic_recommendations"]
-      }
-    }
+  "product_manager": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
-### Cross-Role Collaboration
-Product manager perspective provides:
-- **User Requirements Definition** → UI Designer
-- **Business Constraints and Objectives** → System Architect
-- **Feature Prioritization** → Feature Planner
-- **Market Requirements** → Innovation Lead
-- **Success Metrics** → Business Analyst
-
-## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
-
-### Required Analysis Elements
-- [ ] Clear user value proposition with supporting evidence
-- [ ] Quantified business impact assessment with metrics
-- [ ] Actionable product strategy recommendations
-- [ ] Data-driven priority rankings
-- [ ] Well-defined success criteria and KPIs
-
-### Output Quality Standards
-- [ ] Analysis grounded in real user needs and market data
-- [ ] Business justification with clear logic and assumptions
-- [ ] Recommendations are specific and actionable
-- [ ] Timeline and milestones are realistic and achievable
-- [ ] Risk identification is comprehensive and accurate
-
-### Product Management Principles
-- [ ] **User-Centric**: All decisions prioritize user value and experience
-- [ ] **Data-Driven**: Conclusions supported by metrics and research
-- [ ] **Market-Aware**: Considers competitive landscape and trends
-- [ ] **Business-Focused**: Aligns with commercial objectives and constraints
-- [ ] **Execution-Ready**: Provides clear next steps and success measures
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Product strategy insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-owner.md

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+---
+name: product-owner
+description: Generate or update product-owner/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner "user authentication redesign"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner "mobile app performance optimization"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🎯 **Product Owner Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating product-owner/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Product Backlog Focus**: Feature prioritization, user stories, and acceptance criteria
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **Backlog Management**: User story creation, refinement, and prioritization
+- **Stakeholder Alignment**: Requirements gathering, value definition, and expectation management
+- **Feature Prioritization**: ROI analysis, MoSCoW method, and value-driven delivery
+- **Acceptance Criteria**: Definition of Done, acceptance testing, and quality standards
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute product-owner analysis for existing topic framework
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: product-owner
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load product-owner planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/product-owner.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective
+**Role Focus**: Backlog management, stakeholder alignment, feature prioritization, acceptance criteria
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive product ownership analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with product ownership expertise
+- Provide actionable user stories and acceptance criteria definitions
+- Include feature prioritization and stakeholder alignment strategies
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
+```
+
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute product-owner analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing product-owner framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured product-owner analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with product-owner completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
+
+### Framework-Based Analysis
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+```
+
+### Analysis Document Structure
+```markdown
+# Product Owner Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
+
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: Product Backlog & Feature Prioritization perspective
+
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with product ownership expertise]
+
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[User story formulation and backlog refinement perspective]
+
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Technical feasibility and implementation sequencing considerations]
+
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[User value definition and acceptance criteria analysis]
+
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Sprint planning, dependency management, and delivery strategies]
+
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[Feature adoption, value delivery metrics, and stakeholder satisfaction indicators]
+
+## Product Owner Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific backlog management and feature prioritization strategies]
+
+---
+*Generated by product-owner analysis addressing structured framework*
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Completion Status Update
+```json
+{
+  "product_owner": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Product ownership insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/scrum-master.md

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+---
+name: scrum-master
+description: Generate or update scrum-master/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master "user authentication redesign"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master "mobile app performance optimization"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🎯 **Scrum Master Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating scrum-master/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from agile process and team collaboration perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Agile Process Focus**: Sprint planning, team dynamics, and delivery optimization
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **Sprint Planning**: Task breakdown, estimation, and iteration planning
+- **Team Collaboration**: Communication patterns, impediment removal, and facilitation
+- **Process Optimization**: Agile ceremonies, retrospectives, and continuous improvement
+- **Delivery Management**: Velocity tracking, burndown analysis, and release planning
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute scrum-master analysis for existing topic framework
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: scrum-master
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load scrum-master planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/scrum-master.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from agile process and team collaboration perspective
+**Role Focus**: Sprint planning, team dynamics, process optimization, delivery management
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive agile process analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with scrum mastery expertise
+- Provide actionable sprint planning and team facilitation strategies
+- Include process optimization and impediment removal insights
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
+```
+
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute scrum-master analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing scrum-master framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured scrum-master analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with scrum-master completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
+
+### Framework-Based Analysis
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+```
+
+### Analysis Document Structure
+```markdown
+# Scrum Master Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
+
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: Agile Process & Team Collaboration perspective
+
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with scrum mastery expertise]
+
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[Sprint planning and iteration breakdown perspective]
+
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Technical debt management and process considerations]
+
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[User story refinement and acceptance criteria analysis]
+
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Impediment identification and removal strategies]
+
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[Velocity tracking, burndown metrics, and team performance indicators]
+
+## Scrum Master Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific agile process optimization and team facilitation strategies]
+
+---
+*Generated by scrum-master analysis addressing structured framework*
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Completion Status Update
+```json
+{
+  "scrum_master": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Agile process insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/security-expert.md

@@ -1,328 +0,0 @@
----
-name: security-expert
-description: Security expert perspective brainstorming for threat modeling and security architecture analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:security-expert <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from cybersecurity perspective"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:security-expert "user authentication security review"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:security-expert "API security architecture"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:security-expert "data protection compliance strategy"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
----
-
-## 🔒 **Role Overview: Security Expert**
-
-### Role Definition
-Cybersecurity specialist focused on identifying threats, designing security controls, and ensuring comprehensive protection of systems, data, and users through proactive security architecture and risk management.
-
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **Threat Modeling**: Identify and analyze potential security threats and attack vectors
-- **Security Architecture**: Design robust security controls and defensive measures
-- **Risk Assessment**: Evaluate security risks and develop mitigation strategies
-- **Compliance Management**: Ensure adherence to security standards and regulations
-
-### Focus Areas
-- **Application Security**: Code security, input validation, authentication, authorization
-- **Infrastructure Security**: Network security, system hardening, access controls
-- **Data Protection**: Encryption, privacy controls, data classification, compliance
-- **Operational Security**: Monitoring, incident response, security awareness, procedures
-
-### Success Metrics
-- Vulnerability reduction and remediation rates
-- Security incident prevention and response times
-- Compliance audit results and regulatory adherence
-- Security awareness and training effectiveness
-
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. Threat Landscape Assessment**
-- What are the primary threat vectors and attack scenarios?
-- Who are the potential threat actors and what are their motivations?
-- What are the current vulnerabilities and exposure risks?
-
-**2. Security Architecture Design**
-- What security controls and defensive measures are needed?
-- How should we implement defense-in-depth strategies?
-- What authentication and authorization mechanisms are appropriate?
-
-**3. Risk Management and Compliance**
-- What are the regulatory and compliance requirements?
-- How should we prioritize and manage identified security risks?
-- What security policies and procedures need to be established?
-
-**4. Implementation and Operations**
-- How should we integrate security into development and operations?
-- What monitoring and detection capabilities are required?
-- How should we plan for incident response and recovery?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
-```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
-```
-
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**Security Expert Perspective Questioning**
-
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive security context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-1. **Threat Assessment & Attack Vectors**
-   - Sensitive data types and classification levels?
-   - Known threat actors and attack scenarios?
-   - Current security vulnerabilities and concerns?
-
-2. **Compliance & Regulatory Requirements**
-   - Applicable compliance standards (GDPR, SOX, HIPAA)?
-   - Industry-specific security requirements?
-   - Audit and reporting obligations?
-
-3. **Security Architecture & Controls**
-   - Authentication and authorization needs?
-   - Data encryption and protection requirements?
-   - Network security and access control strategy?
-
-4. **Incident Response & Monitoring**
-   - Security monitoring and detection capabilities?
-   - Incident response procedures and team readiness?
-   - Business continuity and disaster recovery plans?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/security-expert-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
-
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-Execute dedicated security-expert conceptual analysis for: {topic}
-
-ASSIGNED_ROLE: security-expert
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/security-expert/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
-
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load security-expert planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/security-expert.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
-
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply security-expert perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on threat modeling, security architecture, and risk assessment
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
-
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main security analysis
-- recommendations.md: Security recommendations
-- deliverables/: Security-specific outputs as defined in role template
-
-Embody security-expert role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
-```
-
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather security expert context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to security-expert-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load security-expert planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for security-expert role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Conceptual Planning Agent Coordination
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-Conduct security expert perspective brainstorming for: {topic}
-
-ROLE CONTEXT: Security Expert
-- Focus Areas: Threat modeling, security architecture, risk management, compliance
-- Analysis Framework: Security-first approach with emphasis on defense-in-depth and risk mitigation
-- Success Metrics: Vulnerability reduction, incident prevention, compliance adherence, security maturity
-
-USER CONTEXT: {captured_user_requirements_from_session}
-
-ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Threat Modeling and Risk Assessment
-   - Identify potential threat actors and their capabilities
-   - Map attack vectors and potential attack paths
-   - Analyze system vulnerabilities and exposure points
-   - Assess business impact and likelihood of security incidents
-
-2. Security Architecture Design
-   - Design authentication and authorization mechanisms
-   - Plan encryption and data protection strategies
-   - Design network security and access controls
-   - Plan security monitoring and logging architecture
-
-3. Application Security Analysis
-   - Review secure coding practices and input validation
-   - Analyze session management and state security
-   - Assess API security and integration points
-   - Plan for secure software development lifecycle
-
-4. Infrastructure and Operations Security
-   - Design system hardening and configuration management
-   - Plan security monitoring and SIEM integration
-   - Design incident response and recovery procedures
-   - Plan security awareness and training programs
-
-5. Compliance and Regulatory Analysis
-   - Identify applicable compliance frameworks (GDPR, SOX, PCI-DSS, etc.)
-   - Map security controls to regulatory requirements
-   - Plan compliance monitoring and audit procedures
-   - Design privacy protection and data handling policies
-
-6. Security Implementation Planning
-   - Prioritize security controls based on risk assessment
-   - Plan phased security implementation approach
-   - Design security testing and validation procedures
-   - Plan ongoing security maintenance and updates
-
-OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS: Save comprehensive analysis to:
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/security-expert/
-- analysis.md (main security analysis and threat model)
-- security-architecture.md (security controls and defensive measures)
-- compliance-plan.md (regulatory compliance and policy framework)
-- implementation-guide.md (security implementation and operational procedures)
-
-Apply cybersecurity expertise to create comprehensive security solutions that protect against threats while enabling business objectives."
-```
-
-## 📊 **Output Specification**
-
-### Output Location
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/security-expert/
-├── analysis.md                 # Primary security analysis and threat modeling
-├── security-architecture.md    # Security controls and defensive measures
-├── compliance-plan.md          # Regulatory compliance and policy framework
-└── implementation-guide.md     # Security implementation and operational procedures
-```
-
-### Document Templates
-
-#### analysis.md Structure
-```markdown
-# Security Expert Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
-
-## Executive Summary
-[Key security findings and recommendations overview]
-
-## Threat Landscape Assessment
-### Threat Actor Analysis
-### Attack Vector Identification
-### Vulnerability Assessment
-### Risk Prioritization Matrix
-
-## Security Requirements Analysis
-### Functional Security Requirements
-### Compliance and Regulatory Requirements
-### Business Continuity Requirements
-### Privacy and Data Protection Needs
-
-## Security Architecture Design
-### Authentication and Authorization Framework
-### Data Protection and Encryption Strategy
-### Network Security and Access Controls
-### Monitoring and Detection Capabilities
-
-## Risk Management Strategy
-### Risk Assessment Methodology
-### Risk Mitigation Controls
-### Residual Risk Acceptance Criteria
-### Continuous Risk Monitoring Plan
-
-## Implementation Security Plan
-### Security Control Implementation Priorities
-### Security Testing and Validation Approach
-### Incident Response and Recovery Procedures
-### Security Awareness and Training Program
-
-## Compliance and Governance
-### Regulatory Compliance Framework
-### Security Policy and Procedure Requirements
-### Audit and Assessment Planning
-### Governance and Oversight Structure
-```
-
-## 🔄 **Session Integration**
-
-### Status Synchronization
-Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "security_expert": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/security-expert/",
-        "key_insights": ["threat_model", "security_controls", "compliance_requirements"]
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Cross-Role Collaboration
-Security expert perspective provides:
-- **Security Architecture Requirements** → System Architect
-- **Security Compliance Constraints** → Product Manager
-- **Secure Interface Design Requirements** → UI Designer
-- **Data Protection Requirements** → Data Architect
-- **Security Feature Specifications** → Feature Planner
-
-## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
-
-### Required Security Elements
-- [ ] Comprehensive threat model with identified attack vectors and mitigations
-- [ ] Security architecture design with layered defensive controls
-- [ ] Risk assessment with prioritized mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Compliance framework addressing all relevant regulatory requirements
-- [ ] Implementation plan with security testing and validation procedures
-
-### Security Architecture Principles
-- [ ] **Defense-in-Depth**: Multiple layers of security controls and protective measures
-- [ ] **Least Privilege**: Minimal access rights granted based on need-to-know basis
-- [ ] **Zero Trust**: Verify and validate all access requests regardless of location
-- [ ] **Security by Design**: Security considerations integrated from initial design phase
-- [ ] **Fail Secure**: System failures default to secure state with controlled recovery
-
-### Risk Management Standards
-- [ ] **Threat Coverage**: All identified threats have corresponding mitigation controls
-- [ ] **Risk Tolerance**: Security risks align with organizational risk appetite
-- [ ] **Continuous Monitoring**: Ongoing security monitoring and threat detection capabilities
-- [ ] **Incident Response**: Comprehensive incident response and recovery procedures
-- [ ] **Compliance Adherence**: Full compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks
-
-### Implementation Readiness
-- [ ] **Control Effectiveness**: Security controls are tested and validated for effectiveness
-- [ ] **Integration Planning**: Security solutions integrate with existing infrastructure
-- [ ] **Operational Procedures**: Clear procedures for security operations and maintenance
-- [ ] **Training and Awareness**: Security awareness programs for all stakeholders
-- [ ] **Continuous Improvement**: Framework for ongoing security assessment and enhancement

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/subject-matter-expert.md

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+---
+name: subject-matter-expert
+description: Generate or update subject-matter-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert "user authentication redesign"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert "mobile app performance optimization"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🎯 **Subject Matter Expert Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from domain knowledge and technical expertise perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Domain Expertise Focus**: Deep technical knowledge, industry standards, and best practices
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **Domain Knowledge**: Industry-specific expertise, regulatory requirements, and compliance
+- **Technical Standards**: Best practices, design patterns, and architectural guidelines
+- **Risk Assessment**: Technical debt, scalability concerns, and maintenance implications
+- **Knowledge Transfer**: Documentation strategies, training requirements, and expertise sharing
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute subject-matter-expert analysis for existing topic framework
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: subject-matter-expert
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load subject-matter-expert planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/subject-matter-expert.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from domain expertise and technical standards perspective
+**Role Focus**: Domain knowledge, technical standards, risk assessment, knowledge transfer
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive domain expertise analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with subject matter expertise
+- Provide actionable technical standards and best practices recommendations
+- Include risk assessment and compliance considerations
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
+```
+
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute subject-matter-expert analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing subject-matter-expert framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured subject-matter-expert analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with subject-matter-expert completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
+
+### Framework-Based Analysis
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+```
+
+### Analysis Document Structure
+```markdown
+# Subject Matter Expert Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
+
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: Domain Expertise & Technical Standards perspective
+
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with subject matter expertise]
+
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[Domain-specific requirements and industry standards perspective]
+
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Deep technical analysis, architectural patterns, and best practices]
+
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[Domain-specific usability standards and industry conventions]
+
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Technical risks, scalability concerns, and maintenance implications]
+
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[Domain-specific KPIs, compliance metrics, and quality standards]
+
+## Subject Matter Expert Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific technical expertise and industry best practices]
+
+---
+*Generated by subject-matter-expert analysis addressing structured framework*
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Completion Status Update
+```json
+{
+  "subject_matter_expert": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Domain expertise insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md

@@ -1,111 +1,171 @@
 ---
 name: synthesis
-description: Synthesize all brainstorming role perspectives into comprehensive analysis and recommendations
+description: Generate synthesis-specification.md from topic-framework and role analyses with @ references
 usage: /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
-argument-hint: "no arguments required - analyzes existing brainstorming session outputs"
+argument-hint: "no arguments required - synthesizes existing framework and role analyses"
 examples:
   - /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
-## 🧩 **Command Overview: Brainstorm Synthesis**
+## 🧩 **Synthesis Document Generator**
 
 ### Core Function
-Cross-role integration command that synthesizes all brainstorming role perspectives into comprehensive strategic analysis, actionable recommendations, and prioritized implementation roadmaps.
+**Specialized command for generating synthesis-specification.md** that integrates topic-framework.md and all role analysis.md files using @ reference system. Creates comprehensive implementation specification with cross-role insights.
+
+**Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically detects which roles participated in brainstorming by scanning for `*/analysis.md` files. Synthesizes only actual participating roles, not predefined lists.
 
 ### Primary Capabilities
-- **Cross-Role Integration**: Consolidate analysis results from all brainstorming role perspectives
-- **Insight Synthesis**: Identify consensus areas, disagreement points, and breakthrough opportunities
-- **Decision Support**: Generate prioritized recommendations and strategic action plans
-- **Comprehensive Reporting**: Create integrated brainstorming summary reports with implementation guidance
+- **Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically identifies participating roles at runtime
+- **Framework Integration**: Reference topic-framework.md discussion points across all discovered roles
+- **Role Analysis Integration**: Consolidate all discovered role/analysis.md files using @ references
+- **Cross-Framework Comparison**: Compare how each participating role addressed framework discussion points
+- **@ Reference System**: Create structured references to source documents
+- **Update Detection**: Smart updates when new role analyses are added
+- **Flexible Participation**: Supports any subset of available roles (1 to 9+)
 
-### Analysis Scope Coverage
-- **Product Management**: User needs, business value, market opportunities
-- **System Architecture**: Technical design, technology selection, implementation feasibility
-- **User Experience**: Interface design, usability, accessibility standards
-- **Data Architecture**: Data models, processing workflows, analytics capabilities
-- **Security Expert**: Threat assessment, security controls, compliance requirements
-- **User Research**: Behavioral insights, needs validation, experience optimization
-- **Business Analysis**: Process optimization, cost-benefit analysis, change management
-- **Innovation Leadership**: Technology trends, innovation opportunities, future planning
-- **Feature Planning**: Development planning, quality assurance, delivery management
+### Document Integration Model
+**Three-Document Reference System**:
+1. **topic-framework.md** → Structured discussion framework (input)
+2. **[role]/analysis.md** → Role-specific analyses addressing framework (input)
+3. **synthesis-specification.md** → Complete integrated specification (output)
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
-### Phase 1: Session Detection & Data Collection
+### ⚠️ Direct Execution by Main Claude
+**Execution Model**: Main Claude directly executes this command without delegating to sub-agents.
+
+**Rationale**:
+- **Full Context Access**: Avoids context transmission loss that occurs with Task tool delegation
+- **Complex Cognitive Analysis**: Leverages main Claude's complete reasoning capabilities for cross-role synthesis
+- **Tool Usage**: Combines Read/Write/Glob tools with main Claude's analytical intelligence
+
+**DO NOT use Task tool** - Main Claude performs intelligent analysis directly while reading/writing files, ensuring no information loss from context passing.
+
+### Phase 1: Document Discovery & Validation
 ```bash
 # Detect active brainstorming session
 CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    load_context_from(session_id)
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 ELSE:
-    ERROR: "No active brainstorming session found. Please run role-specific brainstorming commands first."
+    ERROR: "No active brainstorming session found"
+    EXIT
+
+# Validate required documents
+CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+IF NOT EXISTS:
+    ERROR: "topic-framework.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts first"
     EXIT
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Role Output Scanning
+### Phase 2: Role Analysis Discovery
 ```bash
-# Scan all role brainstorming outputs
+# Dynamically discover available role analyses
 SCAN_DIRECTORY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-COLLECT_OUTPUTS: [
-    product-manager/analysis.md,
-    system-architect/analysis.md,
-    ui-designer/analysis.md,
-    data-architect/analysis.md,
-    security-expert/analysis.md,
-    user-researcher/analysis.md,
-    business-analyst/analysis.md,
-    innovation-lead/analysis.md,
-    feature-planner/analysis.md
+FIND_ANALYSES: [
+    Scan all subdirectories for */analysis.md files
+    Extract role names from directory names
 ]
+
+# Available roles (for reference, actual participation is dynamic):
+# - product-manager
+# - product-owner
+# - scrum-master
+# - system-architect
+# - ui-designer
+# - ux-expert
+# - data-architect
+# - subject-matter-expert
+# - test-strategist
+
+LOAD_DOCUMENTS: {
+    "topic_framework": topic-framework.md,
+    "role_analyses": [dynamically discovered analysis.md files],
+    "participating_roles": [extract role names from discovered directories],
+    "existing_synthesis": synthesis-specification.md (if exists)
+}
+
+# Note: Not all roles participate in every brainstorming session
+# Only synthesize roles that actually produced analysis.md files
 ```
 
-### Phase 3: Task Tracking Initialization
-Initialize synthesis analysis task tracking:
+### Phase 3: Update Mechanism Check
+```bash
+# Check for existing synthesis
+IF synthesis-specification.md EXISTS:
+    SHOW current synthesis summary to user
+    ASK: "Synthesis exists. Do you want to:"
+    OPTIONS:
+      1. "Regenerate completely" → Create new synthesis
+      2. "Update with new analyses" → Integrate new role analyses
+      3. "Preserve existing" → Exit without changes
+ELSE:
+    CREATE new synthesis
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Synthesis Generation Process
+Initialize synthesis task tracking:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Initialize brainstorming synthesis session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Initializing synthesis"},
-  {"content": "Collect and analyze all role perspectives", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Collecting role analyses"},
-  {"content": "Identify cross-role insights and patterns", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying insights"},
-  {"content": "Generate consensus and disagreement analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing consensus"},
-  {"content": "Create prioritized recommendations matrix", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating recommendations"},
-  {"content": "Generate comprehensive synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"},
-  {"content": "Create action plan with implementation priorities", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating action plan"}
+  {"content": "Validate topic-framework.md and role analyses availability", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating source documents"},
+  {"content": "Load topic framework discussion points structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading framework structure"},
+  {"content": "Cross-analyze role responses to each framework point", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cross-analyzing framework responses"},
+  {"content": "Generate synthesis-specification.md with @ references", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis with references"},
+  {"content": "Update session metadata with synthesis completion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating session metadata"}
 ]
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: Cross-Role Analysis Execution
+### Phase 5: Cross-Role Analysis Execution
 
-#### 4.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
+**Dynamic Role Processing**: The number and types of roles are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered in Phase 2.
+
+#### 5.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
 ```pseudo
-FOR each role_directory in brainstorming_roles:
-    IF role_directory exists:
-        role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
-        role_recommendations = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md") IF EXISTS
-        role_insights[role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
-        role_recommendations[role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
-        role_concerns[role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
+# Iterate over dynamically discovered role analyses
+FOR each discovered_role IN participating_roles:
+    role_directory = brainstorm_dir + "/" + discovered_role
+
+    # Load role analysis (required)
+    role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
+
+    # Load optional artifacts if present
+    IF EXISTS(role_directory + "/recommendations.md"):
+        role_recommendations[discovered_role] = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md")
     END IF
+
+    # Extract insights from analysis
+    role_insights[discovered_role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
+    role_recommendations[discovered_role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
+    role_concerns[discovered_role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
+    role_diagrams[discovered_role] = identify_diagrams_and_visuals(role_analysis)
 END FOR
+
+# Log participating roles for metadata
+participating_role_count = COUNT(participating_roles)
+participating_role_names = participating_roles
 ```
 
-#### 4.2 Cross-Role Insight Analysis
+#### 5.2 Cross-Role Insight Analysis
 ```pseudo
-# Consensus identification
+# Consensus identification (across all participating roles)
 consensus_areas = identify_common_themes(role_insights)
 agreement_matrix = create_agreement_matrix(role_recommendations)
 
-# Disagreement analysis
+# Disagreement analysis (track which specific roles disagree)
 disagreement_areas = identify_conflicting_views(role_insights)
 tension_points = analyze_role_conflicts(role_recommendations)
+FOR each conflict IN disagreement_areas:
+    conflict.dissenting_roles = identify_dissenting_roles(conflict)
+END FOR
 
 # Innovation opportunity extraction
 innovation_opportunities = extract_breakthrough_ideas(role_insights)
 synergy_opportunities = identify_cross_role_synergies(role_insights)
 ```
 
-#### 4.3 Priority and Decision Matrix Generation
+#### 5.3 Priority and Decision Matrix Generation
 ```pseudo
 # Create comprehensive evaluation matrix
 FOR each recommendation:
@@ -123,136 +183,170 @@ SORT recommendations BY priority_score DESC
 ## 📊 **Output Specification**
 
 ### Output Location
+The synthesis process creates **one consolidated document** that integrates all role perspectives:
+
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/
-├── synthesis-report.md          # Comprehensive synthesis analysis report
-├── recommendations-matrix.md    # Priority recommendation matrix
-├── action-plan.md              # Implementation action plan
-├── consensus-analysis.md       # Consensus and disagreement analysis
-└── brainstorm-summary.json     # Machine-readable synthesis data
+├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework structure
+├── [role]/analysis.md          # Input: Role analyses (multiple)
+└── synthesis-specification.md  # ★ OUTPUT: Complete integrated specification
 ```
 
-### Core Output Documents
+#### synthesis-specification.md Structure (Complete Specification)
+
+**Document Purpose**: Defines **"WHAT"** to build - comprehensive requirements and design blueprint.
+**Scope**: High-level features, requirements, and design specifications. Does NOT include executable task breakdown (that's IMPL_PLAN.md's responsibility).
 
-#### synthesis-report.md Structure
 ```markdown
-# Brainstorming Synthesis Report: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp} | Session: WFS-{topic-slug}*
+# [Topic] - Integrated Implementation Specification
+
+**Framework Reference**: @topic-framework.md | **Generated**: [timestamp] | **Session**: WFS-[topic-slug]
+**Source Integration**: All brainstorming role perspectives consolidated
+**Document Type**: Requirements & Design Specification (WHAT to build)
 
 ## Executive Summary
-### Key Findings Overview
-### Strategic Recommendations
-### Implementation Priority
-### Success Metrics
+Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementation priorities.
 
-## Participating Perspectives Analysis
-### Roles Analyzed: {list_of_completed_roles}
-### Coverage Assessment: {completeness_percentage}%
-### Analysis Quality Score: {quality_assessment}
+## Key Designs & Decisions
+### Core Architecture Diagram
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
+    B --> C[Component C]
+```
+*Reference: @system-architect/analysis.md#architecture-diagram*
 
-## Cross-Role Insights Synthesis
+### User Journey Map
+![User Journey](./assets/user-journey.png)
+*Reference: @ux-expert/analysis.md#user-journey*
 
-### 🤝 Consensus Areas
-**Strong Agreement (3+ roles)**:
-1. **{consensus_theme_1}**
-   - Supporting roles: {role1, role2, role3}
-   - Key insight: {shared_understanding}
-   - Business impact: {impact_assessment}
+### Data Model Overview
+```mermaid
+erDiagram
+    USER ||--o{ ORDER : places
+    ORDER ||--|{ LINE-ITEM : contains
+```
+*Reference: @data-architect/analysis.md#data-model*
 
-2. **{consensus_theme_2}**
-   - Supporting roles: {role1, role2, role4}
-   - Key insight: {shared_understanding}
-   - Business impact: {impact_assessment}
+### Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
+**ADR-01: [Decision Title]**
+- **Context**: Background and problem statement
+- **Decision**: Chosen approach
+- **Rationale**: Why this approach was selected
+- **Reference**: @system-architect/analysis.md#adr-01
 
-### ⚡ Breakthrough Ideas
-**Innovation Opportunities**:
-1. **{breakthrough_idea_1}**
-   - Origin: {source_role}
-   - Cross-role support: {supporting_roles}
-   - Innovation potential: {potential_assessment}
+## Controversial Points & Alternatives
+| Point | Adopted Solution | Alternative Solution(s) | Decision Rationale | Dissenting Roles |
+|-------|------------------|-------------------------|--------------------| -----------------|
+| Authentication | JWT Token (@security-expert) | Session-Cookie (@system-architect) | Stateless API support for multi-platform | System Architect noted session performance benefits |
+| UI Framework | React (@ui-designer) | Vue.js (@subject-matter-expert) | Team expertise and ecosystem maturity | Subject Matter Expert preferred Vue for learning curve |
 
-2. **{breakthrough_idea_2}**
-   - Origin: {source_role}
-   - Cross-role support: {supporting_roles}
-   - Innovation potential: {potential_assessment}
+*This section preserves decision context and rejected alternatives for future reference.*
 
-### 🔄 Areas of Disagreement
-**Tension Points Requiring Resolution**:
-1. **{disagreement_area_1}**
-   - Conflicting views: {role1_view} vs {role2_view}
-   - Root cause: {underlying_issue}
-   - Resolution approach: {recommended_resolution}
+## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria
+### Functional Requirements
+| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Source | Priority | Acceptance | Dependencies |
+|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|----------|------------|--------------|
+| FR-01 | User authentication | Enable secure multi-platform access | @product-manager/analysis.md | High | User can login via email/password | None |
+| FR-02 | Data export | User-requested analytics feature | @product-owner/analysis.md | Medium | Export to CSV/JSON | FR-01 |
 
-2. **{disagreement_area_2}**
-   - Conflicting views: {role1_view} vs {role2_view}
-   - Root cause: {underlying_issue}
-   - Resolution approach: {recommended_resolution}
+### Non-Functional Requirements
+| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Target | Validation | Source |
+|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|------------|--------|
+| NFR-01 | Response time | UX research shows <200ms critical | <200ms | Load testing | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
+| NFR-02 | Data encryption | Compliance requirement | AES-256 | Security audit | @security-expert/analysis.md |
 
-## Comprehensive Recommendations Matrix
+### Business Requirements
+| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Value | Success Metric | Source |
+|----|-------------|-------------------|-------|----------------|--------|
+| BR-01 | User retention | Market analysis shows engagement gap | High | 80% 30-day retention | @product-manager/analysis.md |
+| BR-02 | Revenue growth | Business case justification | High | 25% MRR increase | @product-owner/analysis.md |
 
-### 🎯 High Priority (Immediate Action)
-| Recommendation | Business Impact | Technical Feasibility | Implementation Effort | Risk Level | Supporting Roles |
-|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|---------------------|------------|------------------|
-| {rec_1}        | High           | High                 | Medium              | Low        | PM, Arch, UX     |
-| {rec_2}        | High           | Medium               | Low                 | Medium     | BA, PM, FP       |
+## Design Specifications
+### UI/UX Guidelines
+**Consolidated from**: @ui-designer/analysis.md, @ux-expert/analysis.md
+- Component specifications and interaction patterns
+- Visual design system and accessibility requirements
+- User flow and interface specifications
 
-### 📋 Medium Priority (Strategic Planning)
-| Recommendation | Business Impact | Technical Feasibility | Implementation Effort | Risk Level | Supporting Roles |
-|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|---------------------|------------|------------------|
-| {rec_3}        | Medium         | High                 | High                | Medium     | Arch, DA, Sec    |
-| {rec_4}        | Medium         | Medium               | Medium              | Low        | UX, UR, PM       |
+### Architecture Design
+**Consolidated from**: @system-architect/analysis.md, @data-architect/analysis.md
+- System architecture and component interactions
+- Data flow and storage strategy
+- Technology stack decisions
 
-### 🔬 Research Priority (Future Investigation)
-| Recommendation | Business Impact | Technical Feasibility | Implementation Effort | Risk Level | Supporting Roles |
-|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|---------------------|------------|------------------|
-| {rec_5}        | High           | Unknown              | High                | High       | IL, Arch, PM     |
-| {rec_6}        | Medium         | Low                  | High                | High       | IL, DA, Sec      |
+### Domain Expertise & Standards
+**Consolidated from**: @subject-matter-expert/analysis.md
+- Industry standards and best practices
+- Compliance requirements and regulations
+- Technical quality and domain-specific patterns
 
-## Implementation Strategy
+## Process & Collaboration Concerns
+**Consolidated from**: @scrum-master/analysis.md, @product-owner/analysis.md
 
-### Phase 1: Foundation (0-3 months)
-- **Focus**: High-priority, low-effort recommendations
-- **Key Actions**: {action_list}
-- **Success Metrics**: {metrics_list}
-- **Required Resources**: {resource_list}
+### Team Capability Assessment
+| Required Skill | Current Level | Gap Analysis | Mitigation Strategy | Reference |
+|----------------|---------------|--------------|---------------------|-----------|
+| Kubernetes | Intermediate | Need advanced knowledge | Training + external consultant | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
+| React Hooks | Advanced | Team ready | None | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
 
-### Phase 2: Development (3-9 months)
-- **Focus**: Medium-priority strategic initiatives
-- **Key Actions**: {action_list}
-- **Success Metrics**: {metrics_list}
-- **Required Resources**: {resource_list}
+### Process Risks
+| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation | Owner |
+|------|--------|-------------|------------|-------|
+| Cross-team API dependency | High | Medium | Early API contract definition | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
+| UX-Dev alignment gap | Medium | High | Weekly design sync meetings | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
 
-### Phase 3: Innovation (9+ months)
-- **Focus**: Research and breakthrough opportunities
-- **Key Actions**: {action_list}
-- **Success Metrics**: {metrics_list}
-- **Required Resources**: {resource_list}
+### Collaboration Patterns
+- **Design-Dev Pairing**: UI Designer and Frontend Dev pair programming for complex interactions
+- **Architecture Reviews**: Weekly arch review for system-level decisions
+- **User Testing Cadence**: Bi-weekly UX testing sessions with real users
+- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#collaboration
 
-## Risk Assessment and Mitigation
+### Timeline Constraints
+- **Blocking Dependencies**: Project-X API must complete before Phase 2
+- **Resource Constraints**: Only 2 backend developers available in Q1
+- **External Dependencies**: Third-party OAuth provider integration timeline
+- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#constraints
 
+## Implementation Roadmap (High-Level)
+### Development Phases
+**Phase 1** (0-3 months): Foundation and core features
+**Phase 2** (3-6 months): Advanced features and integrations
+**Phase 3** (6+ months): Optimization and innovation
+
+### Technical Guidelines
+- Development standards and code organization
+- Testing strategy and quality assurance
+- Deployment and monitoring approach
+
+### Feature Grouping (Epic-Level)
+- High-level feature grouping and prioritization
+- Epic-level dependencies and sequencing
+- Strategic milestones and release planning
+
+**Note**: Detailed task breakdown into executable work items is handled by `/workflow:plan` → `IMPL_PLAN.md`
+
+## Risk Assessment & Mitigation
 ### Critical Risks Identified
-1. **{risk_1}**: {description} | Mitigation: {strategy}
-2. **{risk_2}**: {description} | Mitigation: {strategy}
+1. **Risk**: Description | **Mitigation**: Strategy
+2. **Risk**: Description | **Mitigation**: Strategy
 
 ### Success Factors
-- {success_factor_1}
-- {success_factor_2}
-- {success_factor_3}
-
-## Next Steps and Follow-up
-### Immediate Actions Required
-### Decision Points Needing Resolution
-### Continuous Monitoring Requirements
-### Future Brainstorming Sessions Recommended
+- Key factors for implementation success
+- Continuous monitoring requirements
+- Quality gates and validation checkpoints
 
 ---
-*This synthesis integrates insights from {role_count} perspectives to provide comprehensive strategic guidance.*
+*Complete implementation specification consolidating all role perspectives into actionable guidance*
 ```
 
 ## 🔄 **Session Integration**
 
-### Status Synchronization
+### Streamlined Status Synchronization
 Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+
+**Dynamic Role Participation**: The `participating_roles` and `roles_synthesized` values are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered.
+
 ```json
 {
   "phases": {
@@ -260,18 +354,47 @@ Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
       "status": "completed",
       "synthesis_completed": true,
       "completed_at": "timestamp",
-      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", "ui-designer", ...],
-      "key_outputs": {
-        "synthesis_report": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md",
-        "action_plan": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/action-plan.md",
-        "recommendations_matrix": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/recommendations-matrix.md"
+      "participating_roles": ["<dynamically-discovered-role-1>", "<dynamically-discovered-role-2>", "..."],
+      "available_roles": ["product-manager", "product-owner", "scrum-master", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "data-architect", "subject-matter-expert", "test-strategist"],
+      "consolidated_output": {
+        "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
       },
-      "metrics": {
-        "roles_analyzed": 9,
-        "consensus_areas": 5,
-        "breakthrough_ideas": 3,
-        "high_priority_recommendations": 8,
-        "implementation_phases": 3
+      "synthesis_quality": {
+        "role_integration": "complete",
+        "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
+        "decision_transparency": "alternatives_documented",
+        "process_risks_identified": true,
+        "implementation_readiness": "ready"
+      },
+      "content_metrics": {
+        "roles_synthesized": "<COUNT(participating_roles)>",
+        "functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "non_functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "business_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "architecture_decisions": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "controversial_points": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "diagrams_included": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "process_risks": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "team_skill_gaps": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "implementation_phases": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "risk_factors_identified": "<dynamic-count>"
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Example with actual values**:
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "BRAINSTORM": {
+      "status": "completed",
+      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "scrum-master"],
+      "content_metrics": {
+        "roles_synthesized": 5,
+        "functional_requirements": 18,
+        "controversial_points": 2
       }
     }
   }
@@ -282,28 +405,96 @@ Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
 
 ### Required Synthesis Elements
 - [ ] Integration of all available role analyses with comprehensive coverage
-- [ ] Clear identification of consensus areas and disagreement points
+- [ ] **Key Designs & Decisions**: Architecture diagrams, user journey maps, ADRs documented
+- [ ] **Controversial Points**: Disagreement points, alternatives, and decision rationale captured
+- [ ] **Process Concerns**: Team capability gaps, process risks, collaboration patterns identified
 - [ ] Quantified priority recommendation matrix with evaluation criteria
 - [ ] Actionable implementation plan with phased approach
 - [ ] Comprehensive risk assessment with mitigation strategies
 
 ### Synthesis Analysis Quality Standards
 - [ ] **Completeness**: Integrates all available role analyses without gaps
+- [ ] **Visual Clarity**: Key diagrams (architecture, data model, user journey) included via Mermaid or images
+- [ ] **Decision Transparency**: Documents not just decisions, but alternatives and why they were rejected
 - [ ] **Insight Generation**: Identifies cross-role patterns and deep insights
-- [ ] **Actionability**: Provides specific, executable recommendations and next steps
-- [ ] **Balance**: Considers all role perspectives and addresses concerns
+- [ ] **Actionability**: Provides specific, executable recommendations with rationale
+- [ ] **Balance**: Considers all role perspectives, including process-oriented roles (Scrum Master)
 - [ ] **Forward-Looking**: Includes long-term strategic and innovation considerations
 
 ### Output Validation Criteria
 - [ ] **Priority-Based**: Recommendations prioritized using multi-dimensional evaluation
-- [ ] **Resource-Aware**: Implementation plans consider resource and time constraints
-- [ ] **Risk-Managed**: Comprehensive risk assessment with mitigation strategies
+- [ ] **Context-Rich**: Each requirement includes rationale summary for immediate understanding
+- [ ] **Resource-Aware**: Team skill gaps and constraints explicitly documented
+- [ ] **Risk-Managed**: Both technical and process risks captured with mitigation strategies
 - [ ] **Measurable Success**: Clear success metrics and monitoring frameworks
 - [ ] **Clear Actions**: Specific next steps with assigned responsibilities and timelines
 
 ### Integration Excellence Standards
-- [ ] **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Successfully identifies and resolves role perspective conflicts
+- [ ] **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Successfully identifies and documents role perspective conflicts
+- [ ] **No Role Marginalization**: Process, UX, and compliance concerns equally visible as functional requirements
 - [ ] **Strategic Coherence**: Recommendations form coherent strategic direction
-- [ ] **Implementation Readiness**: Plans are detailed enough for immediate execution
+- [ ] **Implementation Readiness**: Plans detailed enough for immediate execution, with clear handoff to IMPL_PLAN.md
 - [ ] **Stakeholder Alignment**: Addresses needs and concerns of all key stakeholders
-- [ ] **Continuous Improvement**: Establishes framework for ongoing optimization and learning
+- [ ] **Decision Traceability**: Every major decision traceable to source role analysis via @ references
+- [ ] **Continuous Improvement**: Establishes framework for ongoing optimization and learning
+
+## 🚀 **Recommended Next Steps**
+
+After synthesis completion, follow this recommended workflow:
+
+### Option 1: Standard Planning Workflow (Recommended)
+```bash
+# Step 1: Verify conceptual clarity (Quality Gate)
+/workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
+# → Interactive Q&A (up to 5 questions) to clarify ambiguities in synthesis
+
+# Step 2: Proceed to action planning (after concept verification)
+/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}
+# → Generates IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json files
+
+# Step 3: Verify action plan quality (Quality Gate)
+/workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
+# → Read-only analysis to catch issues before execution
+
+# Step 4: Start implementation
+/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
+```
+
+### Option 2: TDD Workflow
+```bash
+# Step 1: Verify conceptual clarity
+/workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
+
+# Step 2: Generate TDD task chains (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR)
+/workflow:tdd-plan --session WFS-{session-id} "Feature description"
+
+# Step 3: Verify TDD plan quality
+/workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
+
+# Step 4: Execute TDD workflow
+/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
+```
+
+### Quality Gates Explained
+
+**`/workflow:concept-verify`** (Phase 2 - After Brainstorming):
+- **Purpose**: Detect and resolve conceptual ambiguities before detailed planning
+- **Time**: 10-20 minutes (interactive)
+- **Value**: Reduces downstream rework by 40-60%
+- **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md with clarifications
+
+**`/workflow:action-plan-verify`** (Phase 4 - After Planning):
+- **Purpose**: Validate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json consistency and completeness
+- **Time**: 5-10 minutes (read-only analysis)
+- **Value**: Prevents execution of flawed plans, saves 2-5 days
+- **Output**: Verification report with actionable recommendations
+
+### Skip Verification? (Not Recommended)
+
+If you want to skip verification and proceed directly:
+```bash
+/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}
+/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
+```
+
+⚠️ **Warning**: Skipping verification increases risk of late-stage issues and rework.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/system-architect.md

@@ -1,57 +1,164 @@
 ---
 name: system-architect
-description: System architect perspective brainstorming for technical architecture and scalability analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from system architecture perspective"
+description: Generate or update system-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect
   - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect "microservices migration strategy"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect "system performance optimization"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
-## 🏗️ **Role Overview: System Architect**
+## 🏗️ **System Architect Analysis Generator**
 
-### Role Definition
-Technical leader responsible for designing scalable, maintainable, and high-performance system architectures that align with business requirements and industry best practices.
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating system-architect/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from system architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **Technical Architecture Design**: Create scalable and maintainable system architectures
-- **Technology Selection**: Evaluate and choose appropriate technology stacks and tools
-- **System Integration**: Design inter-system communication and integration patterns
-- **Performance Optimization**: Identify bottlenecks and propose optimization solutions
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Architecture Focus**: Technical architecture, scalability, and system design perspective
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
-### Focus Areas
-- **Scalability**: Capacity planning, load handling, elastic scaling strategies
-- **Reliability**: High availability design, fault tolerance, disaster recovery
-- **Security**: Architectural security, data protection, access control patterns
-- **Maintainability**: Code quality, modular design, technical debt management
+### Analysis Scope
+- **Technical Architecture**: Scalable and maintainable system design
+- **Technology Selection**: Stack evaluation and architectural decisions
+- **Performance & Scalability**: Capacity planning and optimization strategies
+- **Integration Patterns**: System communication and data flow design
 
-### Success Metrics
-- System performance benchmarks (latency, throughput)
-- Availability and uptime metrics
-- Scalability handling capacity growth
-- Technical debt and maintenance efficiency
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
 
-### Key Analysis Questions
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Check existing analysis
+CHECK: brainstorm_dir/system-architect/analysis.md
+IF EXISTS:
+    SHOW existing analysis summary
+    ASK: "Analysis exists. Do you want to:"
+    OPTIONS:
+      1. "Update with new insights" → Update existing
+      2. "Replace completely" → Generate new
+      3. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+ELSE:
+    CREATE new analysis
+```
 
-**1. Architecture Design Assessment**
-- What are the strengths and limitations of current architecture?
-- How should we design architecture to meet business requirements?
-- What are the trade-offs between microservices vs monolithic approaches?
+### Phase 3: Agent Task Generation
+**Framework-Based Analysis** (when topic-framework.md exists):
+```bash
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Generate system architect analysis addressing topic framework
 
-**2. Technology Selection Strategy**
-- Which technology stack best fits current requirements?
-- What are the risks and benefits of introducing new technologies?
-- How well does team expertise align with technology choices?
+     ## Framework Integration Required
+     **MANDATORY**: Load and address topic-framework.md discussion points
+     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+     **Output Location**: {session.brainstorm_dir}/system-architect/analysis.md
 
-**3. System Integration Planning**
-- How should systems efficiently integrate and communicate?
-- What are the third-party service integration strategies?
+     ## Analysis Requirements
+     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read topic-framework.md completely
+     2. **Address Each Discussion Point**: Respond to all 5 framework sections from system architecture perspective
+     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../topic-framework.md
+     4. **Technical Focus**: Emphasize scalability, architecture patterns, technology decisions
+     5. **Structured Response**: Use framework structure for analysis organization
+
+     ## Framework Sections to Address
+     - Core Requirements (from architecture perspective)
+     - Technical Considerations (detailed architectural analysis)
+     - User Experience Factors (technical UX considerations)
+     - Implementation Challenges (architecture risks and solutions)
+     - Success Metrics (technical metrics and monitoring)
+
+     ## Output Structure Required
+     ```markdown
+     # System Architect Analysis: [Topic]
+
+     **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md
+     **Role Focus**: System Architecture and Technical Design
+
+     ## Core Requirements Analysis
+     [Address framework requirements from architecture perspective]
+
+     ## Technical Considerations
+     [Detailed architectural analysis]
+
+     ## User Experience Factors
+     [Technical aspects of UX implementation]
+
+     ## Implementation Challenges
+     [Architecture risks and mitigation strategies]
+
+     ## Success Metrics
+     [Technical metrics and system monitoring]
+
+     ## Architecture-Specific Recommendations
+     [Detailed technical recommendations]
+     ```",
+     description="Generate system architect framework-based analysis")
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update Mechanism
+**Analysis Update Process**:
+```bash
+# For existing analysis updates
+IF update_mode = "incremental":
+    Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         prompt="Update existing system architect analysis
+
+         ## Current Analysis Context
+         **Existing Analysis**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/system-architect/analysis.md
+         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+
+         ## Update Requirements
+         1. **Preserve Structure**: Maintain existing analysis structure
+         2. **Add New Insights**: Integrate new technical insights and recommendations
+         3. **Framework Alignment**: Ensure continued alignment with topic framework
+         4. **Technical Updates**: Add new architecture patterns, technology considerations
+         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../topic-framework.md reference
+
+         ## Update Instructions
+         - Read existing analysis completely
+         - Identify areas for enhancement or new insights
+         - Add technical depth while preserving original structure
+         - Update recommendations with new architectural approaches
+         - Maintain framework discussion point addressing",
+         description="Update system architect analysis incrementally")
+```
+
+## Document Structure
+
+### Output Files
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
+├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
+└── system-architect/
+    └── analysis.md            # ★ OUTPUT: Framework-based analysis
+```
+
+### Analysis Structure
+**Required Elements**:
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md (if framework exists)
+- **Role Focus**: System Architecture and Technical Design perspective
+- **5 Framework Sections**: Address each framework discussion point
+- **Technical Recommendations**: Architecture-specific insights and solutions
 - How should we design APIs and manage versioning?
 
 **4. Performance and Scalability**

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ui-designer.md

@@ -1,328 +1,205 @@
 ---
 name: ui-designer
-description: UI designer perspective brainstorming for user experience and interface design analysis
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from UI/UX design perspective"
+description: Generate or update ui-designer/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer
   - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "user authentication redesign"
   - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "mobile app navigation improvement"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "accessibility enhancement strategy"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
-## 🎨 **Role Overview: UI Designer**
+## 🎨 **UI Designer Analysis Generator**
 
-### Role Definition
-Creative professional responsible for designing intuitive, accessible, and visually appealing user interfaces that create exceptional user experiences aligned with business goals and user needs.
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating ui-designer/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from UI/UX design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **User Experience Design**: Create intuitive and efficient user experiences
-- **Interface Design**: Design beautiful and functional user interfaces
-- **Interaction Design**: Design smooth user interaction flows and micro-interactions
-- **Accessibility Design**: Ensure products are inclusive and accessible to all users
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **UI/UX Focus**: User experience, interface design, and accessibility perspective
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
-### Focus Areas
-- **User Experience**: User journeys, usability, satisfaction metrics, conversion optimization
-- **Visual Design**: Interface aesthetics, brand consistency, visual hierarchy
-- **Interaction Design**: Workflow optimization, feedback mechanisms, responsiveness
-- **Accessibility**: WCAG compliance, inclusive design, assistive technology support
+### Analysis Scope
+- **User Experience Design**: Intuitive and efficient user experiences
+- **Interface Design**: Beautiful and functional user interfaces
+- **Interaction Design**: Smooth user interaction flows and micro-interactions
+- **Accessibility Design**: Inclusive design meeting WCAG compliance
 
-### Success Metrics
-- User satisfaction scores and usability metrics
-- Task completion rates and conversion metrics
-- Accessibility compliance scores
-- Visual design consistency and brand alignment
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
-## 🧠 **Analysis Framework**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. User Needs and Behavior Analysis**
-- What are the main pain points users experience during interactions?
-- What gaps exist between user expectations and actual experience?
-- What are the specific needs of different user segments?
-
-**2. Interface and Interaction Design**
-- How can we simplify operational workflows?
-- Is the information architecture logical and intuitive?
-- Are interaction feedback mechanisms timely and clear?
-
-**3. Visual and Brand Strategy**
-- Does the visual design support and strengthen brand identity?
-- Are color schemes, typography, and layouts appropriate and effective?
-- How can we ensure cross-platform consistency?
-
-**4. Technical Implementation Considerations**
-- What are the technical feasibility constraints for design concepts?
-- What responsive design requirements must be addressed?
-- How do performance considerations impact user experience?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
 ```
 
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**UI Designer Perspective Questioning**
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
 
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive UI/UX design context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-1. **User Experience & Personas**
-   - Primary user personas and their key characteristics?
-   - Current user pain points and usability issues?
-   - Platform requirements (web, mobile, desktop)?
-
-2. **Design System & Branding**
-   - Existing design system and brand guidelines?
-   - Visual design preferences and constraints?
-   - Accessibility and compliance requirements?
-
-3. **User Journey & Interactions**
-   - Key user workflows and task flows?
-   - Critical interaction points and user goals?
-   - Performance and responsive design requirements?
-
-4. **Implementation & Integration**
-   - Technical constraints and development capabilities?
-   - Integration with existing UI components?
-   - Testing and validation approach?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/ui-designer-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
 
 ```bash
 Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
 [FLOW_CONTROL]
 
-Execute dedicated ui-designer conceptual analysis for: {topic}
+Execute ui-designer analysis for existing topic framework
 
+## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: ui-designer
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/ui-designer/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load ui-designer planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ui-designer.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
 
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply ui-designer perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on user experience, interface design, and interaction patterns
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load ui-designer planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ui-designer.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
 
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main UI/UX design analysis
-- recommendations.md: Design recommendations
-- deliverables/: UI-specific outputs as defined in role template
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
 
-Embody ui-designer role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from UI/UX perspective
+**Role Focus**: User experience design, interface optimization, accessibility compliance
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive UI/UX analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with UI/UX design expertise
+- Provide actionable design recommendations and interface solutions
+- Include accessibility considerations and WCAG compliance planning
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
 ```
 
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather ui-designer context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to ui-designer-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load ui-designer planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for ui-designer role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute ui-designer analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing ui-designer framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured ui-designer analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with ui-designer completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: Conceptual Planning Agent Coordination
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-Conduct UI designer perspective brainstorming for: {topic}
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
 
-ROLE CONTEXT: UI Designer
-- Focus Areas: User experience, interface design, visual design, accessibility
-- Analysis Framework: User-centered design approach with emphasis on usability and accessibility
-- Success Metrics: User satisfaction, task completion rates, accessibility compliance, visual appeal
-
-USER CONTEXT: {captured_user_requirements_from_session}
-
-ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:
-1. User Experience Analysis
-   - Identify current UX pain points and friction areas
-   - Map user journeys and identify optimization opportunities
-   - Analyze user behavior patterns and preferences
-   - Evaluate task completion flows and success rates
-
-2. Interface Design Assessment
-   - Review current interface design and information architecture
-   - Identify visual hierarchy and navigation issues  
-   - Assess consistency across different screens and states
-   - Evaluate mobile and desktop interface differences
-
-3. Visual Design Strategy
-   - Develop visual design concepts aligned with brand guidelines
-   - Create color schemes, typography, and spacing systems
-   - Design iconography and visual elements
-   - Plan for dark mode and theme variations
-
-4. Interaction Design Planning
-   - Design micro-interactions and animation strategies
-   - Plan feedback mechanisms and loading states
-   - Create error handling and validation UX
-   - Design responsive behavior and breakpoints
-
-5. Accessibility and Inclusion
-   - Evaluate WCAG 2.1 compliance requirements
-   - Design for screen readers and assistive technologies
-   - Plan for color blindness and visual impairments
-   - Ensure keyboard navigation and focus management
-
-6. Prototyping and Testing Strategy
-   - Plan for wireframes, mockups, and interactive prototypes
-   - Design user testing scenarios and success metrics
-   - Create A/B testing strategies for key interactions
-   - Plan for iterative design improvements
-
-OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS: Save comprehensive analysis to:
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
-- analysis.md (main UI/UX analysis)
-- design-system.md (visual design guidelines and components)
-- user-flows.md (user journey maps and interaction flows)
-- accessibility-plan.md (accessibility requirements and implementation)
-
-Apply UI/UX design expertise to create user-centered, accessible, and visually appealing solutions."
+### Framework-Based Analysis
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
 ```
 
-## 📊 **Output Specification**
-
-### Output Location
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
-├── analysis.md                 # Primary UI/UX analysis
-├── design-system.md            # Visual design guidelines and components
-├── user-flows.md               # User journey maps and interaction flows
-└── accessibility-plan.md       # Accessibility requirements and implementation
-```
-
-### Document Templates
-
-#### analysis.md Structure
+### Analysis Document Structure
 ```markdown
-# UI Designer Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
+# UI Designer Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
-## Executive Summary
-[Key UX findings and design recommendations overview]
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: UI/UX Design perspective
 
-## Current UX Assessment
-### User Pain Points
-### Interface Issues
-### Accessibility Gaps
-### Performance Impact on UX
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with UI/UX expertise]
 
-## User Experience Strategy
-### Target User Personas
-### User Journey Mapping
-### Key Interaction Points
-### Success Metrics
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[UI/UX perspective on requirements]
 
-## Visual Design Approach
-### Brand Alignment
-### Color and Typography Strategy
-### Layout and Spacing System
-### Iconography and Visual Elements
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Interface and design system considerations]
 
-## Interface Design Plan
-### Information Architecture
-### Navigation Strategy
-### Component Library
-### Responsive Design Approach
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[Detailed UX analysis and recommendations]
 
-## Accessibility Implementation
-### WCAG Compliance Plan
-### Assistive Technology Support
-### Inclusive Design Features
-### Testing Strategy
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Design implementation and accessibility considerations]
 
-## Prototyping and Validation
-### Wireframe Strategy
-### Interactive Prototype Plan
-### User Testing Approach
-### Iteration Framework
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[UX metrics and usability success criteria]
+
+## UI/UX Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific design recommendations and solutions]
+
+---
+*Generated by ui-designer analysis addressing structured framework*
 ```
 
 ## 🔄 **Session Integration**
 
-### Status Synchronization
-Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+### Completion Status Update
 ```json
 {
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "ui_designer": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/",
-        "key_insights": ["ux_improvement", "accessibility_requirement", "design_pattern"]
-      }
-    }
+  "ui_designer": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
-### Cross-Role Collaboration
-UI designer perspective provides:
-- **User Interface Requirements** → System Architect
-- **User Experience Metrics and Goals** → Product Manager
-- **Data Visualization Requirements** → Data Architect
-- **Secure Interaction Design Patterns** → Security Expert
-- **Feature Interface Specifications** → Feature Planner
-
-## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
-
-### Required Design Elements
-- [ ] Comprehensive user journey analysis with pain points identified
-- [ ] Complete interface design solution with visual mockups
-- [ ] Accessibility compliance plan meeting WCAG 2.1 standards
-- [ ] Responsive design strategy for multiple devices and screen sizes
-- [ ] Usability testing plan with clear success metrics
-
-### Design Principles Validation
-- [ ] **User-Centered**: All design decisions prioritize user needs and goals
-- [ ] **Consistency**: Interface elements and interactions maintain visual and functional consistency
-- [ ] **Accessibility**: Design meets WCAG guidelines and supports assistive technologies
-- [ ] **Usability**: Operations are simple, intuitive, with minimal learning curve
-- [ ] **Visual Appeal**: Design supports brand identity while creating positive user emotions
-
-### UX Quality Metrics
-- [ ] **Task Success**: High task completion rates with minimal errors
-- [ ] **Efficiency**: Optimal task completion times with streamlined workflows
-- [ ] **Satisfaction**: Positive user feedback and high satisfaction scores
-- [ ] **Accessibility**: Full compliance with accessibility standards and inclusive design
-- [ ] **Consistency**: Uniform experience across different devices and platforms
-
-### Implementation Readiness
-- [ ] **Design System**: Comprehensive component library and style guide
-- [ ] **Prototyping**: Interactive prototypes demonstrating key user flows
-- [ ] **Documentation**: Clear specifications for development implementation
-- [ ] **Testing Plan**: Structured approach for usability and accessibility validation
-- [ ] **Iteration Strategy**: Framework for continuous design improvement based on user feedback
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UI/UX insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/user-researcher.md

@@ -1,267 +0,0 @@
----
-name: user-researcher
-description: User researcher perspective brainstorming for user behavior analysis and research insights
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:user-researcher <topic>
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge to analyze from user research perspective"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:user-researcher "user onboarding experience"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:user-researcher "mobile app usability issues"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:user-researcher "feature adoption analysis"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*)
----
-
-## 🔍 **Role Overview: User Researcher**
-
-### Role Definition
-User experience research specialist responsible for understanding user behavior, identifying needs and pain points, and transforming research insights into actionable product improvements that enhance user satisfaction and engagement.
-
-### Core Responsibilities
-- **User Behavior Research**: Deep analysis of user behavior patterns and motivations
-- **User Needs Discovery**: Research to discover unmet user needs and requirements
-- **Usability Assessment**: Evaluate product usability and user experience issues
-- **User Insights Generation**: Transform research findings into actionable product insights
-
-### Focus Areas
-- **User Behavior**: Usage patterns, decision paths, task completion methods
-- **User Needs**: Explicit needs, implicit needs, emotional requirements
-- **User Experience**: Pain points, satisfaction levels, emotional responses, expectations
-- **Market Segmentation**: User personas, demographic segments, usage scenarios
-
-### Success Metrics
-- User satisfaction and engagement scores
-- Task success rates and completion times
-- Quality and actionability of research insights
-- Impact of research on product decisions
-
-## 🧠 **分析框架**
-
-@~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md
-
-### Key Analysis Questions
-
-**1. User Understanding and Insights**
-- What are the real needs and pain points of target users?
-- What are the user behavior patterns and usage scenarios?
-- What are the differentiated needs of various user groups?
-
-**2. User Experience Analysis**
-- What are the main issues with the current user experience?
-- What obstacles and friction points exist in user task completion?
-- What gaps exist between user satisfaction and expectations?
-
-**3. Research Methods and Validation**
-- Which research methods are most suitable for the current problem?
-- How can hypotheses and design decisions be validated?
-- How can continuous user feedback be collected?
-
-**4. Insights Translation and Application**
-- How can research findings be translated into product improvements?
-- How can product decisions and design be influenced?
-- How can a user-centered culture be established?
-
-## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
-
-### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
-Session detection and selection:
-```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
-  prompt_user_to_select_session()
-else
-  use_existing_or_create_new()
-fi
-```
-
-### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
-**User Researcher Perspective Questioning**
-
-Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive user researcher context:
-
-#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
-
-**1. User Behavior Patterns and Insights**
-- Who are the primary users and what are their key characteristics?
-- What user behaviors, patterns, or pain points have you observed?
-- Are there specific user segments or personas you're particularly interested in?
-- What user feedback or data do you already have available?
-
-**2. Research Focus and Pain Points**
-- What specific user experience problems or questions need to be addressed?
-- Are there particular user tasks, workflows, or touchpoints to focus on?
-- What assumptions about users need to be validated or challenged?
-- What gaps exist in your current understanding of user needs?
-
-**3. Research Context and Constraints**
-- What research has been done previously and what were the key findings?
-- Are there specific research methods you prefer or want to avoid?
-- What timeline and resources are available for user research?
-- Who are the key stakeholders that need to understand user insights?
-
-**4. User Testing Strategy and Goals**
-- What specific user experience improvements are you hoping to achieve?
-- How do you currently measure user satisfaction or success?
-- Are there competitive products or experiences you want to benchmark against?
-- What would successful user research outcomes look like for this project?
-
-#### Context Validation
-- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
-- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
-- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/user-researcher-context.md`
-
-### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
-**Dedicated Agent Execution**
-
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-Execute dedicated user researcher conceptual analysis for: {topic}
-
-ASSIGNED_ROLE: user-researcher
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/user-researcher/
-USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
-
-Flow Control Steps:
-[
-  {
-    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
-    \"action\": \"Load user-researcher planning template\",
-    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/user-researcher.md))\",
-    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
-  }
-]
-
-Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
-- Apply user researcher perspective to topic analysis
-- Focus on user behavior patterns, pain points, research insights, and user testing strategy
-- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
-- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
-- Address all user context from questioning phase
-
-Deliverables:
-- analysis.md: Main user researcher analysis
-- recommendations.md: User researcher recommendations
-- deliverables/: User researcher-specific outputs as defined in role template
-
-Embody user researcher role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
-```
-
-### Progress Tracking
-TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
-```json
-[
-  {"content": "Gather user researcher context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
-  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to user-researcher-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
-  {"content": "Load user-researcher planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
-  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for user-researcher role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
-]
-```
-
-## 📊 **输出结构**
-
-### 保存位置
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/user-researcher/
-├── analysis.md                     # 主要用户研究分析
-├── user-personas.md                # 详细用户画像和细分
-├── research-plan.md                # 方法论和研究方法
-└── insights-recommendations.md     # 关键发现和可执行建议
-```
-
-### 文档模板
-
-#### analysis.md 结构
-```markdown
-# User Researcher Analysis: {Topic}
-*Generated: {timestamp}*
-
-## Executive Summary
-[核心用户研究发现和建议概述]
-
-## Current User Landscape
-### User Base Overview
-### Behavioral Patterns
-### Usage Statistics and Trends
-### Satisfaction Metrics
-
-## User Needs Analysis
-### Primary User Needs
-### Unmet Needs and Gaps
-### Need Prioritization Matrix
-### Emotional and Functional Needs
-
-## User Experience Assessment
-### Current UX Strengths
-### Major Pain Points and Friction
-### Usability Issues Identified
-### Accessibility Gaps
-
-## User Behavior Insights
-### User Journey Mapping
-### Decision-Making Patterns
-### Task Completion Analysis
-### Behavioral Segments
-
-## Research Recommendations
-### Recommended Research Methods
-### Key Research Questions
-### Success Metrics and KPIs
-### Research Timeline and Resources
-
-## Actionable Insights
-### Immediate UX Improvements
-### Product Feature Recommendations
-### Long-term User Strategy
-### Success Measurement Plan
-```
-
-## 🔄 **会话集成**
-
-### 状态同步
-分析完成后，更新 `workflow-session.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "user_researcher": {
-        "status": "completed",
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/user-researcher/",
-        "key_insights": ["user_behavior_pattern", "unmet_need", "usability_issue"]
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 与其他角色的协作
-用户研究员视角为其他角色提供：
-- **用户需求和洞察** → Product Manager
-- **用户行为数据** → Data Architect
-- **用户体验要求** → UI Designer
-- **用户安全需求** → Security Expert
-- **功能使用场景** → Feature Planner
-
-## ✅ **质量标准**
-
-### 必须包含的研究元素
-- [ ] 详细的用户行为分析
-- [ ] 明确的用户需求识别
-- [ ] 全面的用户体验评估
-- [ ] 科学的研究方法设计
-- [ ] 可执行的改进建议
-
-### 用户研究原则检查
-- [ ] 以人为本：所有分析以用户为中心
-- [ ] 基于证据：结论有数据和研究支撑
-- [ ] 行为导向：关注实际行为而非声明意图
-- [ ] 情境考虑：分析使用场景和环境因素
-- [ ] 持续迭代：建立持续研究和改进机制
-
-### 洞察质量评估
-- [ ] 洞察的新颖性和深度
-- [ ] 建议的可操作性和具体性
-- [ ] 影响评估的准确性
-- [ ] 研究方法的科学性
-- [ ] 用户代表性的覆盖度

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ux-expert.md

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+---
+name: ux-expert
+description: Generate or update ux-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert [topic]
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert "user authentication redesign"
+  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert "mobile app performance optimization"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🎯 **UX Expert Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating ux-expert/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from user experience and interface design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **UX Design Focus**: User interface, interaction patterns, and usability optimization
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **User Interface Design**: Visual hierarchy, layout patterns, and component design
+- **Interaction Patterns**: User flows, navigation, and microinteractions
+- **Usability Optimization**: Accessibility, cognitive load, and user testing strategies
+- **Design Systems**: Component libraries, design tokens, and consistency frameworks
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Determine execution mode
+IF framework_mode == true:
+    mode = "framework_based_analysis"
+    topic_ref = load_framework_topic()
+    discussion_points = extract_framework_points()
+ELSE:
+    mode = "standalone_analysis"
+    topic_ref = provided_topic
+    discussion_points = generate_basic_structure()
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Execution with Flow Control
+**Framework-Based Analysis Generation**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute ux-expert analysis for existing topic framework
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: ux-expert
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
+ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load ux-expert planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ux-expert.md))
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from user experience and interface design perspective
+**Role Focus**: UI design, interaction patterns, usability optimization, design systems
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive UX design analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with UX design expertise
+- Provide actionable interface design and usability optimization strategies
+- Include accessibility considerations and interaction pattern recommendations
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+"
+```
+
+## 📋 **TodoWrite Integration**
+
+### Workflow Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Detect active session and locate topic framework",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute ux-expert analysis using conceptual-planning-agent with FLOW_CONTROL",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Executing ux-expert framework analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate analysis.md addressing all framework discussion points",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Generating structured ux-expert analysis"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update workflow-session.json with ux-expert completion status",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Updating session metadata"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Structure**
+
+### Framework-Based Analysis
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+```
+
+### Analysis Document Structure
+```markdown
+# UX Expert Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
+
+## Framework Reference
+**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Role Focus**: User Experience & Interface Design perspective
+
+## Discussion Points Analysis
+[Address each point from topic-framework.md with UX design expertise]
+
+### Core Requirements (from framework)
+[User interface and interaction design requirements perspective]
+
+### Technical Considerations (from framework)
+[Design system implementation and technical feasibility considerations]
+
+### User Experience Factors (from framework)
+[Usability optimization, accessibility, and user-centered design analysis]
+
+### Implementation Challenges (from framework)
+[Design implementation challenges and progressive enhancement strategies]
+
+### Success Metrics (from framework)
+[UX metrics including usability testing, user satisfaction, and design KPIs]
+
+## UX Expert Specific Recommendations
+[Role-specific interface design patterns and usability optimization strategies]
+
+---
+*Generated by ux-expert analysis addressing structured framework*
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Completion Status Update
+```json
+{
+  "ux_expert": {
+    "status": "completed",
+    "framework_addressed": true,
+    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Integration Points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UX design insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/concept-eval.md

@@ -1,407 +0,0 @@
----
-name: concept-eval
-description: Evaluate concept planning before implementation with intelligent tool analysis
-usage: /workflow:concept-eval [--tool gemini|codex|both] <input>
-argument-hint: [--tool gemini|codex|both] "concept description"|file.md|ISS-001
-examples:
-  - /workflow:concept-eval "Build microservices architecture"
-  - /workflow:concept-eval --tool gemini requirements.md
-  - /workflow:concept-eval --tool both ISS-001
-allowed-tools: Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Concept Evaluation Command
-
-## Overview
-Pre-planning evaluation command that assesses concept feasibility, identifies potential issues, and provides optimization recommendations before formal planning begins. **Works before `/workflow:plan`** to catch conceptual problems early and improve initial design quality.
-
-## Core Responsibilities
-- **Concept Analysis**: Evaluate design concepts for architectural soundness
-- **Feasibility Assessment**: Technical and resource feasibility evaluation
-- **Risk Identification**: Early identification of potential implementation risks
-- **Optimization Suggestions**: Generate actionable improvement recommendations
-- **Context Integration**: Leverage existing codebase patterns and documentation
-- **Tool Selection**: Use gemini for strategic analysis, codex for technical assessment
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:concept-eval [--tool gemini|codex|both] <input>
-```
-
-## Parameters
-- **--tool**: Specify evaluation tool (default: both)
-  - `gemini`: Strategic and architectural evaluation
-  - `codex`: Technical feasibility and implementation assessment
-  - `both`: Comprehensive dual-perspective analysis
-- **input**: Concept description, file path, or issue reference
-
-## Input Detection
-- **Files**: `.md/.txt/.json/.yaml/.yml` → Reads content and extracts concept requirements
-- **Issues**: `ISS-*`, `ISSUE-*`, `*-request-*` → Loads issue data and requirement specifications
-- **Text**: Everything else → Parses natural language concept descriptions
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Evaluation Process
-The command performs comprehensive concept evaluation through:
-
-**0. Context Preparation** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **MCP Tools Integration**: Use Code Index for codebase exploration, Exa for external context
-- **Documentation loading**: Automatic context gathering based on concept scope
-  - **Always check**: `CLAUDE.md`, `README.md` - Project context and conventions
-  - **For architecture concepts**: `.workflow/docs/architecture/`, existing system patterns
-  - **For specific modules**: `.workflow/docs/modules/[relevant-module]/` documentation
-  - **For API concepts**: `.workflow/docs/api/` specifications
-- **Claude Code Memory Integration**: Access conversation history and previous work context
-  - **Session Memory**: Current session analysis and decisions
-  - **Project Memory**: Previous implementations and lessons learned
-  - **Pattern Memory**: Successful approaches and anti-patterns identified
-  - **Context Continuity**: Reference previous concept evaluations and outcomes
-- **Context-driven selection**: Only load documentation relevant to the concept scope
-- **Pattern analysis**: Identify existing implementation patterns and conventions
-
-**1. Input Processing & Context Gathering**
-- Parse input to extract concept requirements and scope
-- Automatic tool assignment based on evaluation needs:
-  - **Strategic evaluation** (gemini): Architectural soundness, design patterns, business alignment
-  - **Technical assessment** (codex): Implementation complexity, technical feasibility, resource requirements
-  - **Comprehensive analysis** (both): Combined strategic and technical evaluation
-- Load relevant project documentation and existing patterns
-
-**2. Concept Analysis** ⚠️ CRITICAL EVALUATION PHASE
-- **Conceptual integrity**: Evaluate design coherence and completeness
-- **Architectural soundness**: Assess alignment with existing system architecture
-- **Technical feasibility**: Analyze implementation complexity and resource requirements
-- **Risk assessment**: Identify potential technical and business risks
-- **Dependency analysis**: Map required dependencies and integration points
-
-**3. Evaluation Execution**
-Based on tool selection, execute appropriate analysis:
-
-**Gemini Strategic Analysis**:
-```bash
-~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Strategic evaluation of concept design and architecture
-TASK: Analyze concept for architectural soundness, design patterns, and strategic alignment
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,README.md,.workflow/docs/**/*} Concept requirements and existing patterns | Previous conversation context and Claude Code session memory for continuity and pattern recognition
-EXPECTED: Strategic assessment with architectural recommendations informed by session history
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/concept-eval.txt) | Focus on strategic soundness and design quality | Reference previous evaluations and lessons learned
-"
-```
-
-**Codex Technical Assessment**:
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Technical feasibility assessment of concept implementation
-TASK: Evaluate implementation complexity, technical risks, and resource requirements
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,README.md,src/**/*} Concept requirements and existing codebase | Current session work context and previous technical decisions
-EXPECTED: Technical assessment with implementation recommendations building on session memory
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/concept-eval.txt) | Focus on technical feasibility and implementation complexity | Consider previous technical approaches and outcomes
-" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**Combined Analysis** (when --tool both):
-Execute both analyses in parallel, then synthesize results for comprehensive evaluation.
-
-**4. Optimization Recommendations**
-- **Design improvements**: Architectural and design optimization suggestions
-- **Risk mitigation**: Strategies to address identified risks
-- **Implementation approach**: Recommended technical approaches and patterns
-- **Resource optimization**: Efficient resource utilization strategies
-- **Integration suggestions**: Optimal integration with existing systems
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Evaluation Criteria ⚠️ CRITICAL
-Concept evaluation focuses on these key dimensions:
-
-**Strategic Evaluation (Gemini)**:
-1. **Architectural Soundness**: Design coherence and system integration
-2. **Business Alignment**: Concept alignment with business objectives
-3. **Scalability Considerations**: Long-term growth and expansion potential
-4. **Design Patterns**: Appropriate use of established design patterns
-5. **Risk Assessment**: Strategic and business risk identification
-
-**Technical Assessment (Codex)**:
-1. **Implementation Complexity**: Technical difficulty and effort estimation
-2. **Technical Feasibility**: Availability of required technologies and skills
-3. **Resource Requirements**: Development time, infrastructure, and team resources
-4. **Integration Challenges**: Technical integration complexity and risks
-5. **Performance Implications**: System performance and scalability impact
-
-### Evaluation Context Loading ⚠️ CRITICAL
-Context preparation ensures comprehensive evaluation:
-
-```json
-// Context loading strategy for concept evaluation
-"context_preparation": {
-  "required_docs": [
-    "CLAUDE.md",
-    "README.md"
-  ],
-  "conditional_docs": {
-    "architecture_concepts": [
-      ".workflow/docs/architecture/",
-      "docs/system-design.md"
-    ],
-    "api_concepts": [
-      ".workflow/docs/api/",
-      "api-documentation.md"
-    ],
-    "module_concepts": [
-      ".workflow/docs/modules/[relevant-module]/",
-      "src/[module]/**/*.md"
-    ]
-  },
-  "pattern_analysis": {
-    "existing_implementations": "src/**/*",
-    "configuration_patterns": "config/",
-    "test_patterns": "test/**/*"
-  },
-  "claude_code_memory": {
-    "session_context": "Current session conversation history and decisions",
-    "project_memory": "Previous implementations and lessons learned across sessions",
-    "pattern_memory": "Successful approaches and anti-patterns identified",
-    "evaluation_history": "Previous concept evaluations and their outcomes",
-    "technical_decisions": "Past technical choices and their rationale",
-    "architectural_evolution": "System architecture changes and migration patterns"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Analysis Output Structure
-
-**Evaluation Categories**:
-```markdown
-## Concept Evaluation Summary
-
-### ✅ Strengths Identified
-- [ ] **Design Quality**: Well-defined architectural approach
-- [ ] **Technical Approach**: Appropriate technology selection
-- [ ] **Integration**: Good fit with existing systems
-
-### ⚠️ Areas for Improvement
-- [ ] **Complexity**: Reduce implementation complexity in module X
-- [ ] **Dependencies**: Simplify dependency management approach
-- [ ] **Scalability**: Address potential performance bottlenecks
-
-### ❌ Critical Issues
-- [ ] **Architecture**: Conflicts with existing system design
-- [ ] **Resources**: Insufficient resources for proposed timeline
-- [ ] **Risk**: High technical risk in component Y
-
-### 🎯 Optimization Recommendations
-- [ ] **Alternative Approach**: Consider microservices instead of monolithic design
-- [ ] **Technology Stack**: Use existing React patterns instead of Vue
-- [ ] **Implementation Strategy**: Phase implementation to reduce risk
-```
-
-## Document Generation & Output
-
-**Evaluation Workflow**: Input Processing → Context Loading → Analysis Execution → Report Generation → Recommendations
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **CONCEPT_EVALUATION.md**: Complete evaluation results and recommendations
-- **evaluation-session.json**: Evaluation metadata and tool configuration
-- **OPTIMIZATION_SUGGESTIONS.md**: Actionable improvement recommendations
-
-**Auto-Created (for comprehensive analysis)**:
-- **strategic-analysis.md**: Gemini strategic evaluation results
-- **technical-assessment.md**: Codex technical feasibility analysis
-- **risk-assessment-matrix.md**: Comprehensive risk evaluation
-- **implementation-roadmap.md**: Recommended implementation approach
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.evaluation/
-├── evaluation-session.json        # Evaluation session metadata
-├── CONCEPT_EVALUATION.md          # Complete evaluation results
-├── OPTIMIZATION_SUGGESTIONS.md    # Actionable recommendations
-├── strategic-analysis.md          # Gemini strategic evaluation
-├── technical-assessment.md        # Codex technical assessment
-├── risk-assessment-matrix.md      # Risk evaluation matrix
-└── implementation-roadmap.md      # Recommended approach
-```
-
-### Evaluation Implementation
-
-**Session-Aware Evaluation**:
-```bash
-# Check for existing sessions and context
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
-if [ -n "$active_sessions" ]; then
-  echo "Found active sessions: $active_sessions"
-  echo "Concept evaluation will consider existing session context"
-fi
-
-# Create evaluation session directory
-evaluation_session="CE-$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
-mkdir -p ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session"
-
-# Store evaluation metadata
-cat > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/evaluation-session.json" << EOF
-{
-  "session_id": "$evaluation_session",
-  "timestamp": "$(date -Iseconds)",
-  "concept_input": "$input_description",
-  "tool_selection": "$tool_choice",
-  "context_loaded": [
-    "CLAUDE.md",
-    "README.md"
-  ],
-  "evaluation_scope": "$evaluation_scope"
-}
-EOF
-```
-
-**Tool Execution Pattern**:
-```bash
-# Execute based on tool selection
-case "$tool_choice" in
-  "gemini")
-    echo "Performing strategic concept evaluation with Gemini..."
-    ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "$gemini_prompt" > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/strategic-analysis.md"
-    ;;
-  "codex")
-    echo "Performing technical assessment with Codex..."
-    codex --full-auto exec "$codex_prompt" -s danger-full-access > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/technical-assessment.md"
-    ;;
-  "both"|*)
-    echo "Performing comprehensive evaluation with both tools..."
-    ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "$gemini_prompt" > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/strategic-analysis.md" &
-    codex --full-auto exec "$codex_prompt" -s danger-full-access > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/technical-assessment.md" &
-    wait # Wait for both analyses to complete
-
-    # Synthesize results
-    ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-    PURPOSE: Synthesize strategic and technical concept evaluations
-    TASK: Combine analyses and generate integrated recommendations
-    CONTEXT: @{.workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/strategic-analysis.md,.workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/technical-assessment.md}
-    EXPECTED: Integrated evaluation with prioritized recommendations
-    RULES: Focus on actionable insights and clear next steps
-    " > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/CONCEPT_EVALUATION.md"
-    ;;
-esac
-```
-
-## Integration with Workflow Commands
-
-### Workflow Position
-**Pre-Planning Phase**: Use before formal planning to optimize concept quality
-```
-concept-eval → plan → plan-verify → execute
-```
-
-### Usage Scenarios
-
-**Early Concept Validation**:
-```bash
-# Validate initial concept before detailed planning
-/workflow:concept-eval "Build real-time notification system using WebSockets"
-```
-
-**Architecture Review**:
-```bash
-# Strategic architecture evaluation
-/workflow:concept-eval --tool gemini architecture-proposal.md
-```
-
-**Technical Feasibility Check**:
-```bash
-# Technical implementation assessment
-/workflow:concept-eval --tool codex "Implement ML-based recommendation engine"
-```
-
-**Comprehensive Analysis**:
-```bash
-# Full strategic and technical evaluation
-/workflow:concept-eval --tool both ISS-042
-```
-
-### Integration Benefits
-- **Early Risk Detection**: Identify issues before detailed planning
-- **Quality Improvement**: Optimize concepts before implementation planning
-- **Resource Efficiency**: Avoid detailed planning of infeasible concepts
-- **Decision Support**: Data-driven concept selection and refinement
-- **Team Alignment**: Clear evaluation criteria and recommendations
-
-## Error Handling & Edge Cases
-
-### Input Validation
-```bash
-# Validate input format and accessibility
-if [[ -z "$input" ]]; then
-  echo "Error: Concept input required"
-  echo "Usage: /workflow:concept-eval [--tool gemini|codex|both] <input>"
-  exit 1
-fi
-
-# Check file accessibility for file inputs
-if [[ "$input" =~ \.(md|txt|json|yaml|yml)$ ]] && [[ ! -f "$input" ]]; then
-  echo "Error: File not found: $input"
-  echo "Please provide a valid file path or concept description"
-  exit 1
-fi
-```
-
-### Tool Availability
-```bash
-# Check tool availability
-if [[ "$tool_choice" == "gemini" ]] || [[ "$tool_choice" == "both" ]]; then
-  if ! command -v ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper &> /dev/null; then
-    echo "Warning: Gemini wrapper not available, using codex only"
-    tool_choice="codex"
-  fi
-fi
-
-if [[ "$tool_choice" == "codex" ]] || [[ "$tool_choice" == "both" ]]; then
-  if ! command -v codex &> /dev/null; then
-    echo "Warning: Codex not available, using gemini only"
-    tool_choice="gemini"
-  fi
-fi
-```
-
-### Recovery Strategies
-```bash
-# Fallback to manual evaluation if tools fail
-if [[ "$evaluation_failed" == "true" ]]; then
-  echo "Automated evaluation failed, generating manual evaluation template..."
-  cat > ".workflow/.evaluation/$evaluation_session/manual-evaluation-template.md" << EOF
-# Manual Concept Evaluation
-
-## Concept Description
-$input_description
-
-## Evaluation Checklist
-- [ ] **Architectural Soundness**: Does the concept align with existing architecture?
-- [ ] **Technical Feasibility**: Are required technologies available and mature?
-- [ ] **Resource Requirements**: Are time and team resources realistic?
-- [ ] **Integration Complexity**: How complex is integration with existing systems?
-- [ ] **Risk Assessment**: What are the main technical and business risks?
-
-## Recommendations
-[Provide manual evaluation and recommendations]
-EOF
-fi
-```
-
-## Quality Standards
-
-### Evaluation Excellence
-- **Comprehensive Analysis**: Consider all aspects of concept feasibility
-- **Context-Rich Assessment**: Leverage full project context and existing patterns
-- **Actionable Recommendations**: Provide specific, implementable suggestions
-- **Risk-Aware Evaluation**: Identify and assess potential implementation risks
-
-### User Experience Excellence
-- **Clear Results**: Present evaluation results in actionable format
-- **Focused Recommendations**: Prioritize most critical optimization suggestions
-- **Integration Guidance**: Provide clear next steps for concept refinement
-- **Tool Transparency**: Clear indication of which tools were used and why
-
-### Output Quality
-- **Structured Reports**: Consistent, well-organized evaluation documentation
-- **Evidence-Based**: All recommendations backed by analysis and reasoning
-- **Prioritized Actions**: Clear indication of critical vs. optional improvements
-- **Implementation Ready**: Evaluation results directly usable for planning phase

.claude/commands/workflow/concept-verify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+---
+name: concept-verify
+description: Identify underspecified areas in brainstorming artifacts through targeted clarification questions before action planning
+usage: /workflow:concept-verify [--session <session-id>]
+argument-hint: "optional: --session <session-id>"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:concept-verify
+  - /workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-auth
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Outline
+
+**Goal**: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in brainstorming artifacts (synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses) before moving to action planning phase.
+
+**Timing**: This command runs AFTER `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` and BEFORE `/workflow:plan`. It serves as a quality gate to ensure conceptual clarity before detailed task planning.
+
+**Execution steps**:
+
+1. **Session Detection & Validation**
+   ```bash
+   # Detect active workflow session
+   IF --session parameter provided:
+       session_id = provided session
+   ELSE:
+       CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+       IF active_session EXISTS:
+           session_id = get_active_session()
+       ELSE:
+           ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id> or start a session."
+           EXIT
+
+   # Validate brainstorming completion
+   brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+   CHECK: brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
+   IF NOT EXISTS:
+       ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
+       EXIT
+
+   CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+   IF NOT EXISTS:
+       WARN: "topic-framework.md not found. Verification will be limited."
+   ```
+
+2. **Load Brainstorming Artifacts**
+   ```bash
+   # Load primary artifacts
+   synthesis_spec = Read(brainstorm_dir + "/synthesis-specification.md")
+   topic_framework = Read(brainstorm_dir + "/topic-framework.md") # if exists
+
+   # Discover role analyses
+   role_analyses = Glob(brainstorm_dir + "/*/analysis.md")
+   participating_roles = extract_role_names(role_analyses)
+   ```
+
+3. **Ambiguity & Coverage Scan**
+
+   Perform structured scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: **Clear** / **Partial** / **Missing**.
+
+   **Requirements Clarity**:
+   - Functional requirements specificity and measurability
+   - Non-functional requirements with quantified targets
+   - Business requirements with success metrics
+   - Acceptance criteria completeness
+
+   **Architecture & Design Clarity**:
+   - Architecture decisions with rationale
+   - Data model completeness (entities, relationships, constraints)
+   - Technology stack justification
+   - Integration points and API contracts
+
+   **User Experience & Interface**:
+   - User journey completeness
+   - Critical interaction flows
+   - Error/edge case handling
+   - Accessibility and localization considerations
+
+   **Implementation Feasibility**:
+   - Team capability vs. required skills
+   - External dependencies and failure modes
+   - Resource constraints (timeline, personnel)
+   - Technical constraints and tradeoffs
+
+   **Risk & Mitigation**:
+   - Critical risks identified
+   - Mitigation strategies defined
+   - Success factors clarity
+   - Monitoring and quality gates
+
+   **Process & Collaboration**:
+   - Role responsibilities and handoffs
+   - Collaboration patterns defined
+   - Timeline and milestone clarity
+   - Dependency management strategy
+
+   **Decision Traceability**:
+   - Controversial points documented
+   - Alternatives considered and rejected
+   - Decision rationale clarity
+   - Consensus vs. dissent tracking
+
+   **Terminology & Consistency**:
+   - Canonical terms defined
+   - Consistent naming across artifacts
+   - No unresolved placeholders (TODO, TBD, ???)
+
+   For each category with **Partial** or **Missing** status, add to candidate question queue unless:
+   - Clarification would not materially change implementation strategy
+   - Information is better deferred to planning phase
+
+4. **Generate Prioritized Question Queue**
+
+   Internally generate prioritized queue of candidate questions (maximum 5):
+
+   **Constraints**:
+   - Maximum 5 questions per session
+   - Each question must be answerable with:
+     * Multiple-choice (2-5 mutually exclusive options), OR
+     * Short answer (≤5 words)
+   - Only include questions whose answers materially impact:
+     * Architecture decisions
+     * Data modeling
+     * Task decomposition
+     * Risk mitigation
+     * Success criteria
+   - Ensure category coverage balance
+   - Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk
+
+   **Prioritization Heuristic**:
+   ```
+   priority_score = (impact_on_planning * 0.4) +
+                    (uncertainty_level * 0.3) +
+                    (risk_if_unresolved * 0.3)
+   ```
+
+   If zero high-impact ambiguities found, proceed to **Step 8** (report success).
+
+5. **Sequential Question Loop** (Interactive)
+
+   Present **EXACTLY ONE** question at a time:
+
+   **Multiple-choice format**:
+   ```markdown
+   **Question {N}/5**: {Question text}
+
+   | Option | Description |
+   |--------|-------------|
+   | A | {Option A description} |
+   | B | {Option B description} |
+   | C | {Option C description} |
+   | D | {Option D description} |
+   | Short | Provide different answer (≤5 words) |
+   ```
+
+   **Short-answer format**:
+   ```markdown
+   **Question {N}/5**: {Question text}
+
+   Format: Short answer (≤5 words)
+   ```
+
+   **Answer Validation**:
+   - Validate answer maps to option or fits ≤5 word constraint
+   - If ambiguous, ask quick disambiguation (doesn't count as new question)
+   - Once satisfactory, record in working memory and proceed to next question
+
+   **Stop Conditions**:
+   - All critical ambiguities resolved
+   - User signals completion ("done", "no more", "proceed")
+   - Reached 5 questions
+
+   **Never reveal future queued questions in advance**.
+
+6. **Integration After Each Answer** (Incremental Update)
+
+   After each accepted answer:
+
+   ```bash
+   # Ensure Clarifications section exists
+   IF synthesis_spec NOT contains "## Clarifications":
+       Insert "## Clarifications" section after "# [Topic]" heading
+
+   # Create session subsection
+   IF NOT contains "### Session YYYY-MM-DD":
+       Create "### Session {today's date}" under "## Clarifications"
+
+   # Append clarification entry
+   APPEND: "- Q: {question} → A: {answer}"
+
+   # Apply clarification to appropriate section
+   CASE category:
+       Functional Requirements → Update "## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria"
+       Architecture → Update "## Key Designs & Decisions" or "## Design Specifications"
+       User Experience → Update "## Design Specifications > UI/UX Guidelines"
+       Risk → Update "## Risk Assessment & Mitigation"
+       Process → Update "## Process & Collaboration Concerns"
+       Data Model → Update "## Key Designs & Decisions > Data Model Overview"
+       Non-Functional → Update "## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria > Non-Functional Requirements"
+
+   # Remove obsolete/contradictory statements
+   IF clarification invalidates existing statement:
+       Replace statement instead of duplicating
+
+   # Save immediately
+   Write(synthesis_specification.md)
+   ```
+
+7. **Validation After Each Write**
+
+   - [ ] Clarifications section contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer
+   - [ ] Total asked questions ≤ 5
+   - [ ] Updated sections contain no lingering placeholders
+   - [ ] No contradictory earlier statements remain
+   - [ ] Markdown structure valid
+   - [ ] Terminology consistent across all updated sections
+
+8. **Completion Report**
+
+   After questioning loop ends or early termination:
+
+   ```markdown
+   ## ✅ Concept Verification Complete
+
+   **Session**: WFS-{session-id}
+   **Questions Asked**: {count}/5
+   **Artifacts Updated**: synthesis-specification.md
+   **Sections Touched**: {list section names}
+
+   ### Coverage Summary
+
+   | Category | Status | Notes |
+   |----------|--------|-------|
+   | Requirements Clarity | ✅ Resolved | Acceptance criteria quantified |
+   | Architecture & Design | ✅ Clear | No ambiguities found |
+   | Implementation Feasibility | ⚠️ Deferred | Team training plan to be defined in IMPL_PLAN |
+   | Risk & Mitigation | ✅ Resolved | Critical risks now have mitigation strategies |
+   | ... | ... | ... |
+
+   **Legend**:
+   - ✅ Resolved: Was Partial/Missing, now addressed
+   - ✅ Clear: Already sufficient
+   - ⚠️ Deferred: Low impact, better suited for planning phase
+   - ❌ Outstanding: Still Partial/Missing but question quota reached
+
+   ### Recommendations
+
+   - ✅ **PROCEED to /workflow:plan**: Conceptual foundation is clear
+   - OR ⚠️ **Address Outstanding Items First**: {list critical outstanding items}
+   - OR 🔄 **Run /workflow:concept-verify Again**: If new information available
+
+   ### Next Steps
+   ```bash
+   /workflow:plan  # Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json
+   ```
+   ```
+
+9. **Update Session Metadata**
+
+   ```json
+   {
+     "phases": {
+       "BRAINSTORM": {
+         "status": "completed",
+         "concept_verification": {
+           "completed": true,
+           "completed_at": "timestamp",
+           "questions_asked": 3,
+           "categories_clarified": ["Requirements", "Risk", "Architecture"],
+           "outstanding_items": [],
+           "recommendation": "PROCEED_TO_PLANNING"
+         }
+       }
+     }
+   }
+   ```
+
+## Behavior Rules
+
+- **If no meaningful ambiguities found**: Report "No critical ambiguities detected. Conceptual foundation is clear." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:plan`.
+- **If synthesis-specification.md missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` first.
+- **Never exceed 5 questions** (disambiguation retries don't count as new questions).
+- **Respect user early termination**: Signals like "stop", "done", "proceed" should stop questioning.
+- **If quota reached with high-impact items unresolved**: Explicitly flag them under "Outstanding" with recommendation to address before planning.
+- **Avoid speculative tech stack questions** unless absence blocks conceptual clarity.
+
+## Operating Principles
+
+### Context Efficiency
+- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable clarifications
+- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
+- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent analysis
+
+### Verification Guidelines
+- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections**: Report them accurately
+- **Prioritize high-impact ambiguities**: Focus on what affects planning
+- **Use examples over exhaustive rules**: Cite specific instances
+- **Report zero issues gracefully**: Emit success report with coverage statistics
+- **Update incrementally**: Save after each answer to minimize context loss
+
+## Context
+
+{ARGS}

.claude/commands/workflow/docs.md

@@ -1,256 +0,0 @@
----
-name: docs
-description: Generate hierarchical architecture and API documentation using doc-generator agent with flow_control
-usage: /workflow:docs <type> [scope]
-argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:docs all
-  - /workflow:docs architecture src/modules
-  - /workflow:docs api --scope api/
----
-
-# Workflow Documentation Command
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:docs <type> [scope]
-```
-
-## Input Detection
-- **Document Types**: `architecture`, `api`, `all` → Creates appropriate documentation tasks
-- **Scope**: Optional module/directory filtering → Focuses documentation generation
-- **Default**: `all` → Complete documentation suite
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Planning & Task Creation Process
-The command performs structured planning and task creation:
-
-**0. Pre-Planning Architecture Analysis** ⚠️ MANDATORY FIRST STEP
-- **System Structure Analysis**: MUST run `bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)` for dynamic task decomposition
-- **Module Boundary Identification**: Understand module organization and dependencies
-- **Architecture Pattern Recognition**: Identify architectural styles and design patterns
-- **Foundation for documentation**: Use structure analysis to guide task decomposition
-
-**1. Documentation Planning**
-- **Type Analysis**: Determine documentation scope (architecture/api/all)
-- **Module Discovery**: Use architecture analysis results to identify components
-- **Dynamic Task Decomposition**: Analyze project structure to determine optimal task count and module grouping
-- **Session Management**: Create or use existing documentation session
-
-**2. Task Generation**
-- **Create session**: `.workflow/WFS-docs-[timestamp]/`
-- **Create active marker**: `.workflow/.active-WFS-docs-[timestamp]` (must match session folder name)
-- **Generate IMPL_PLAN.md**: Documentation requirements and task breakdown
-- **Create task.json files**: Individual documentation tasks with flow_control
-- **Setup TODO_LIST.md**: Progress tracking for documentation generation
-
-### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **Check for active sessions**: Look for `.workflow/.active-WFS-docs-*` markers
-- **Marker naming**: Active marker must exactly match session folder name
-- **Session creation**: `WFS-docs-[timestamp]` folder with matching `.active-WFS-docs-[timestamp]` marker
-- **Task execution**: Use `/workflow:execute` to run individual documentation tasks within active session
-- **Session isolation**: Each documentation session maintains independent context and state
-
-## Output Structure
-```
-.workflow/docs/
-├── README.md              # System navigation
-├── modules/               # Level 1: Module documentation
-│   ├── [module-1]/
-│   │   ├── overview.md
-│   │   ├── api.md
-│   │   ├── dependencies.md
-│   │   └── examples.md
-│   └── [module-n]/...
-├── architecture/          # Level 2: System architecture
-│   ├── system-design.md
-│   ├── module-map.md
-│   ├── data-flow.md
-│   └── tech-stack.md
-└── api/                   # Level 2: Unified API docs
-    ├── unified-api.md
-    └── openapi.yaml
-```
-
-## Task Decomposition Standards
-
-### Dynamic Task Planning Rules
-**Module Grouping**: Max 3 modules per task, max 30 files per task
-**Task Count**: Calculate based on `total_modules ÷ 3 (rounded up) + base_tasks`
-**File Limits**: Split tasks when file count exceeds 30 in any module group
-**Base Tasks**: System overview (1) + Architecture (1) + API consolidation (1)
-**Module Tasks**: Group related modules by dependency depth and functional similarity
-
-### Documentation Task Types
-**IMPL-001**: System Overview Documentation
-- Project structure analysis
-- Technology stack documentation
-- Main navigation creation
-
-**IMPL-002**: Module Documentation (per module)
-- Individual module analysis
-- API surface documentation
-- Dependencies and relationships
-- Usage examples
-
-**IMPL-003**: Architecture Documentation
-- System design patterns
-- Module interaction mapping
-- Data flow documentation
-- Design principles
-
-**IMPL-004**: API Documentation
-- Endpoint discovery and analysis
-- OpenAPI specification generation
-- Authentication documentation
-- Integration examples
-
-### Task JSON Schema (5-Field Architecture)
-Each documentation task uses the workflow-architecture.md 5-field schema:
-- **id**: IMPL-N format
-- **title**: Documentation task name
-- **status**: pending|active|completed|blocked
-- **meta**: { type: "documentation", agent: "@doc-generator" }
-- **context**: { requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, scope }
-- **flow_control**: { pre_analysis[], implementation_approach, target_files[] }
-
-## Document Generation
-
-### Workflow Process
-**Input Analysis** → **Session Creation** → **IMPL_PLAN.md** → **.task/IMPL-NNN.json** → **TODO_LIST.md** → **Execute Tasks**
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Documentation requirements and task breakdown
-- **Session state**: Task references and documentation paths
-
-**Auto-Created (based on scope)**:
-- **TODO_LIST.md**: Progress tracking for documentation tasks
-- **.task/IMPL-*.json**: Individual documentation tasks with flow_control
-- **.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md**: Documentation analysis artifacts
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/
-├── .active-WFS-docs-20231201-143022  # Active session marker (matches folder name)
-└── WFS-docs-20231201-143022/         # Documentation session folder
-    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md                  # Main documentation plan
-    ├── TODO_LIST.md                  # Progress tracking
-    ├── .process/
-    │   └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md       # Documentation analysis
-    └── .task/
-        ├── IMPL-001.json             # System overview task
-        ├── IMPL-002.json             # Module documentation task
-        ├── IMPL-003.json             # Architecture documentation task
-        └── IMPL-004.json             # API documentation task
-```
-
-### Task Flow Control Templates
-
-**System Overview Task (IMPL-001)**:
-```json
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [
-    {
-      "step": "system_architecture_analysis",
-      "action": "Discover system architecture and module hierarchy",
-      "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
-      "output_to": "system_structure"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "project_discovery",
-      "action": "Discover project structure and entry points",
-      "command": "bash(find . -type f -name '*.json' -o -name '*.md' -o -name 'package.json' | head -20)",
-      "output_to": "project_structure"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "analyze_tech_stack",
-      "action": "Analyze technology stack and dependencies using structure analysis",
-      "command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"Analyze project technology stack and dependencies based on: [system_structure]\"",
-      "output_to": "tech_analysis"
-    }
-  ],
-  "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
-}
-```
-
-**Module Documentation Task (IMPL-002)**:
-```json
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [
-    {
-      "step": "load_system_structure",
-      "action": "Load system architecture analysis from previous task",
-      "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL-001-system_structure.output 2>/dev/null || ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
-      "output_to": "system_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "module_analysis",
-      "action": "Analyze specific module structure and API within system context",
-      "command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"Analyze module [MODULE_NAME] structure and exported API within system: [system_context]\"",
-      "output_to": "module_context"
-    }
-  ],
-  "target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/[MODULE_NAME]/overview.md"]
-}
-```
-
-## Analysis Templates
-
-### Project Structure Analysis Rules
-- Identify main modules and purposes
-- Map directory organization patterns
-- Extract entry points and configuration files
-- Recognize architectural styles and design patterns
-- Analyze module relationships and dependencies
-- Document technology stack and requirements
-
-### Module Analysis Rules
-- Identify module boundaries and entry points
-- Extract exported functions, classes, interfaces
-- Document internal organization and structure
-- Analyze API surfaces with types and parameters
-- Map dependencies within and between modules
-- Extract usage patterns and examples
-
-### API Analysis Rules
-- Classify endpoint types (REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, RPC)
-- Extract request/response parameters and schemas
-- Document authentication and authorization requirements
-- Generate OpenAPI 3.0 specification structure
-- Create comprehensive endpoint documentation
-- Provide usage examples and integration guides
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Invalid document type**: Clear error message with valid options
-- **Module not found**: Skip missing modules with warning
-- **Analysis failures**: Fall back to file-based analysis
-- **Permission issues**: Clear guidance on directory access
-
-## Key Benefits
-
-### Structured Documentation Process
-- **Task-based approach**: Documentation broken into manageable, trackable tasks
-- **Flow control integration**: Systematic analysis ensures completeness
-- **Progress visibility**: TODO_LIST.md provides clear completion status
-- **Quality assurance**: Each task has defined acceptance criteria
-
-### Workflow Integration
-- **Planning foundation**: Documentation provides context for implementation planning
-- **Execution consistency**: Same task execution model as implementation
-- **Context accumulation**: Documentation builds comprehensive project understanding
-
-## Usage Examples
-
-### Complete Documentation Workflow
-```bash
-# Step 1: Create documentation plan and tasks
-/workflow:docs all
-
-# Step 2: Execute documentation tasks (after planning)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-001  # System overview
-/workflow:execute IMPL-002  # Module documentation
-/workflow:execute IMPL-003  # Architecture documentation
-/workflow:execute IMPL-004  # API documentation
-```
-The system creates structured documentation tasks with proper session management, task.json files, and integration with the broader workflow system for systematic and trackable documentation generation.

.claude/commands/workflow/execute.md

@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: execute
 description: Coordinate agents for existing workflow tasks with automatic discovery
-usage: /workflow:execute
-argument-hint: none
+usage: /workflow:execute [--resume-session="session-id"]
+argument-hint: [--resume-session="session-id"]
 examples:
   - /workflow:execute
+  - /workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-user-auth"
 ---
 
 # Workflow Execute Command
@@ -12,9 +13,12 @@ examples:
 ## Overview
 Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption**, providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
 
+**Resume Mode**: When called with `--resume-session` flag, skips discovery phase and directly enters TodoWrite generation and agent execution for the specified session.
+
 ## Core Rules
 **Complete entire workflow autonomously without user interruption, using TodoWrite for comprehensive progress tracking.**
 **Execute all discovered pending tasks sequentially until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
+**Auto-complete session when all tasks finished: Call `/workflow:session:complete` upon workflow completion.**
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 - **Session Discovery**: Identify and select active workflow sessions
@@ -24,6 +28,7 @@ Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, ag
 - **Flow Control Execution**: Execute pre-analysis steps and context accumulation
 - **Status Synchronization**: Update task JSON files and workflow state
 - **Autonomous Completion**: Continue execution until all tasks complete or reach blocking state
+- **Session Auto-Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all workflow tasks finished
 
 ## Execution Philosophy
 - **Discovery-first**: Auto-discover existing plans and tasks
@@ -38,9 +43,10 @@ Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, ag
 
 ### Flow Control Rules
 1. **Auto-trigger**: When `task.flow_control.pre_analysis` array exists in task JSON, agents execute these steps
-2. **Sequential Processing**: Agents execute steps in order, accumulating context
-3. **Variable Passing**: Agents use `[variable_name]` syntax to reference step outputs
+2. **Sequential Processing**: Agents execute steps in order, accumulating context including artifacts
+3. **Variable Passing**: Agents use `[variable_name]` syntax to reference step outputs including artifact content
 4. **Error Handling**: Agents follow step-specific error strategies (`fail`, `skip_optional`, `retry_once`)
+5. **Artifacts Priority**: When artifacts exist in task.context.artifacts, load synthesis specifications first
 
 ### Execution Pattern
 ```
@@ -50,31 +56,51 @@ Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implement
 ```
 
 ### Context Accumulation Process (Executed by Agents)
+- **Load Artifacts**: Agents retrieve synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs from `context.artifacts`
 - **Load Dependencies**: Agents retrieve summaries from `context.depends_on` tasks
-- **Execute Analysis**: Agents run CLI tools with accumulated context
+- **Execute Analysis**: Agents run CLI tools with accumulated context including artifacts
 - **Prepare Implementation**: Agents build comprehensive context for implementation
-- **Continue Implementation**: Agents use all accumulated context for task execution
+- **Continue Implementation**: Agents use all accumulated context including artifacts for task execution
 
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
-### Phase 1: Discovery
+### Resume Mode Detection
+**Special Flag Processing**: When `--resume-session="session-id"` is provided:
+1. **Skip Discovery Phase**: Use provided session ID directly
+2. **Load Specified Session**: Read session state from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
+3. **Direct TodoWrite Generation**: Skip to Phase 3 (Planning) immediately
+4. **Accelerated Execution**: Enter agent coordination without validation delays
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery (Normal Mode Only)
 1. **Check Active Sessions**: Find `.workflow/.active-*` markers
 2. **Select Session**: If multiple found, prompt user selection
 3. **Load Session State**: Read `workflow-session.json` and `IMPL_PLAN.md`
 4. **Scan Tasks**: Analyze `.task/*.json` files for ready tasks
 
-### Phase 2: Analysis
+**Note**: In resume mode, this phase is completely skipped.
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis (Normal Mode Only)
 1. **Dependency Resolution**: Build execution order based on `depends_on`
 2. **Status Validation**: Filter tasks with `status: "pending"` and met dependencies
 3. **Agent Assignment**: Determine agent type from `meta.agent` or `meta.type`
 4. **Context Preparation**: Load dependency summaries and inherited context
 
-### Phase 3: Planning
-1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list with status markers
-2. **Mark Initial Status**: Set first task as `in_progress`
-3. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use
+**Note**: In resume mode, this phase is also skipped as session analysis was already completed by `/workflow:status`.
+
+### Phase 3: Planning (Resume Mode Entry Point)
+**This is where resume mode directly enters after skipping Phases 1 & 2**
+
+1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list with status markers from session state
+2. **Mark Initial Status**: Set first pending task as `in_progress`
+3. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
 4. **Prepare Complete Task JSON**: Include pre_analysis and flow control steps for agent consumption
-5. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure all required context is available
+5. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure all required context is available from existing session
+
+**Resume Mode Behavior**:
+- Load existing session state directly from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
+- Use session's task files and summaries without discovery
+- Generate TodoWrite from current session progress
+- Proceed immediately to agent execution
 
 ### Phase 4: Execution
 1. **Pass Task with Flow Control**: Include complete task JSON with `pre_analysis` steps for agent execution
@@ -88,10 +114,12 @@ Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implement
 2. **Generate Summary**: Create task summary in `.summaries/`
 3. **Update TodoWrite**: Mark current task complete, advance to next
 4. **Synchronize State**: Update session state and workflow status
+5. **Check Workflow Complete**: Verify all tasks are completed
+6. **Auto-Complete Session**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all tasks finished
 
 ## Task Discovery & Queue Building
 
-### Session Discovery Process
+### Session Discovery Process (Normal Mode)
 ```
 ├── Check for .active-* markers in .workflow/
 ├── If multiple active sessions found → Prompt user to select
@@ -102,6 +130,16 @@ Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implement
 └── Build execution queue of ready tasks from selected session
 ```
 
+### Resume Mode Process (--resume-session flag)
+```
+├── Use provided session-id directly (skip discovery)
+├── Validate .workflow/{session-id}/ directory exists
+├── Load session's workflow-session.json and IMPL_PLAN.md directly
+├── Scan session's .task/ directory for task JSON files
+├── Use existing task statuses and dependencies (no re-analysis needed)
+└── Build execution queue from session state (prioritize pending/in-progress tasks)
+```
+
 ### Task Status Logic
 ```
 pending + dependencies_met → executable
@@ -114,11 +152,21 @@ blocked → skip until dependencies clear
 
 #### TodoWrite Workflow Rules
 1. **Initial Creation**: Generate TodoWrite from discovered pending tasks for entire workflow
+   - **Normal Mode**: Create from discovery results
+   - **Resume Mode**: Create from existing session state and current progress
 2. **Single In-Progress**: Mark ONLY ONE task as `in_progress` at a time
 3. **Immediate Updates**: Update status after each task completion without user interruption
 4. **Status Synchronization**: Sync with JSON task files after updates
 5. **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
 
+#### Resume Mode TodoWrite Generation
+**Special behavior when `--resume-session` flag is present**:
+- Load existing session progress from `.workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
+- Identify currently in-progress or next pending task
+- Generate TodoWrite starting from interruption point
+- Preserve completed task history in TodoWrite display
+- Focus on remaining pending tasks for execution
+
 #### TodoWrite Tool Usage
 **Use Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite tool** to track workflow progress in real-time:
 
@@ -137,9 +185,9 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic"
     },
     {
-      content: "Execute IMPL-2: Review implementations [code-review-agent]",
+      content: "Execute TEST-FIX-1: Validate implementation tests [test-fix-agent]",
       status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-2: Review implementations"
+      activeForm: "Executing TEST-FIX-1: Validate implementation tests"
     }
   ]
 });
@@ -164,41 +212,57 @@ TodoWrite({
 - **Immediate Completion**: Mark tasks `completed` immediately after finishing
 - **Status Sync**: Sync TodoWrite status with JSON task files after each update
 - **Full Execution**: Continue TodoWrite tracking until all workflow tasks complete
+- **Workflow Completion Check**: When all tasks marked `completed`, auto-call `/workflow:session:complete`
 
 #### TODO_LIST.md Update Timing
 - **Before Agent Launch**: Update TODO_LIST.md to mark task as `in_progress` (⚠️)
 - **After Task Complete**: Update TODO_LIST.md to mark as `completed` (✅), advance to next
 - **On Error**: Keep as `in_progress` in TODO_LIST.md, add error note
+- **Workflow Complete**: When all tasks completed, call `/workflow:session:complete`
 - **Session End**: Sync all TODO_LIST.md statuses with JSON task files
 
 ### 3. Agent Context Management
 **Comprehensive context preparation** for autonomous agent execution:
 
 #### Context Sources (Priority Order)
-1. **Complete Task JSON**: Full task definition including all fields
-2. **Flow Control Context**: Accumulated outputs from pre_analysis steps
-3. **Dependency Summaries**: Previous task completion summaries
-4. **Session Context**: Workflow paths and session metadata
-5. **Inherited Context**: Parent task context and shared variables
+1. **Complete Task JSON**: Full task definition including all fields and artifacts
+2. **Artifacts Context**: Brainstorming outputs and synthesis specifications from task.context.artifacts
+3. **Flow Control Context**: Accumulated outputs from pre_analysis steps (including artifact loading)
+4. **Dependency Summaries**: Previous task completion summaries
+5. **Session Context**: Workflow paths and session metadata
+6. **Inherited Context**: Parent task context and shared variables
 
 #### Context Assembly Process
 ```
-1. Load Task JSON → Base context
-2. Execute Flow Control → Accumulated context
-3. Load Dependencies → Dependency context
-4. Prepare Session Paths → Session context
-5. Combine All → Complete agent context
+1. Load Task JSON → Base context (including artifacts array)
+2. Load Artifacts → Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs
+3. Execute Flow Control → Accumulated context (with artifact loading steps)
+4. Load Dependencies → Dependency context
+5. Prepare Session Paths → Session context
+6. Combine All → Complete agent context with artifact integration
 ```
 
 #### Agent Context Package Structure
 ```json
 {
-  "task": { /* Complete task JSON */ },
+  "task": { /* Complete task JSON with artifacts array */ },
+  "artifacts": {
+    "synthesis_specification": { "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md", "priority": "highest" },
+    "topic_framework": { "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md", "priority": "medium" },
+    "role_analyses": [ /* Individual role analysis files */ ],
+    "available_artifacts": [ /* All detected brainstorming artifacts */ ]
+  },
   "flow_context": {
-    "step_outputs": { "pattern_analysis": "...", "dependency_context": "..." }
+    "step_outputs": {
+      "synthesis_specification": "...",
+      "individual_artifacts": "...",
+      "pattern_analysis": "...",
+      "dependency_context": "..."
+    }
   },
   "session": {
     "workflow_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/",
+    "brainstorming_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/",
     "todo_list_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/TODO_LIST.md",
     "summaries_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/",
     "task_json_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.task/IMPL-1.1.json"
@@ -209,10 +273,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 ```
 
 #### Context Validation Rules
-- **Task JSON Complete**: All 5 fields present and valid
-- **Flow Control Ready**: All pre_analysis steps completed if present
+- **Task JSON Complete**: All 5 fields present and valid, including artifacts array in context
+- **Artifacts Available**: Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs accessible
+- **Flow Control Ready**: All pre_analysis steps completed including artifact loading steps
 - **Dependencies Loaded**: All depends_on summaries available
-- **Session Paths Valid**: All workflow paths exist and accessible
+- **Session Paths Valid**: All workflow paths exist and accessible, including .brainstorming directory
 - **Agent Assignment**: Valid agent type specified in meta.agent
 
 ### 4. Agent Execution Pattern
@@ -220,61 +285,175 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 #### Agent Prompt Template
 ```bash
-Task(subagent_type="{agent_type}",
-     prompt="Execute {task_id}: {task_title}
+Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
+     prompt="**TASK EXECUTION WITH FULL JSON LOADING**
 
-     ## Task Definition
-     **ID**: {task_id}
-     **Type**: {task_type}
-     **Agent**: {assigned_agent}
+     ## STEP 1: Load Complete Task JSON
+     **MANDATORY**: First load the complete task JSON from: {session.task_json_path}
 
-     ## Execution Instructions
-     {flow_control_marker}
+     cat {session.task_json_path}
 
-     ### Flow Control Steps (if [FLOW_CONTROL] present)
-     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these pre_analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
-     {pre_analysis_steps}
+     **CRITICAL**: Validate all 5 required fields are present:
+     - id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control
 
-     ### Implementation Context
-     **Requirements**: {context.requirements}
-     **Focus Paths**: {context.focus_paths}
-     **Acceptance Criteria**: {context.acceptance}
-     **Target Files**: {flow_control.target_files}
+     ## STEP 2: Task Definition (From Loaded JSON)
+     **ID**: Use id field from JSON
+     **Title**: Use title field from JSON
+     **Type**: Use meta.type field from JSON
+     **Agent**: Use meta.agent field from JSON
+     **Status**: Verify status is pending or active
 
-     ### Session Context
+     ## STEP 3: Flow Control Execution (if flow_control.pre_analysis exists)
+     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute pre_analysis steps sequentially from loaded JSON:
+
+     **PRIORITY: Artifact Loading Steps First**
+     1. **Load Synthesis Specification** (if present): Priority artifact loading for consolidated design
+     2. **Load Individual Artifacts** (fallback): Load role-specific brainstorming outputs if synthesis unavailable
+     3. **Execute Remaining Steps**: Continue with other pre_analysis steps
+
+     For each step in flow_control.pre_analysis array:
+     1. Execute step.command/commands with variable substitution (support both single command and commands array)
+     2. Store output to step.output_to variable
+     3. Handle errors per step.on_error strategy (skip_optional, fail, retry_once)
+     4. Pass accumulated variables to next step including artifact context
+
+     **Special Artifact Loading Commands**:
+     - Use `bash(ls path 2>/dev/null || echo 'file not found')` for artifact existence checks
+     - Use `Read(path)` for loading artifact content
+     - Use `find` commands for discovering multiple artifact files
+     - Reference artifacts in subsequent steps using output variables: [synthesis_specification], [individual_artifacts]
+
+     ## STEP 4: Implementation Context (From JSON context field)
+     **Requirements**: Use context.requirements array from JSON
+     **Focus Paths**: Use context.focus_paths array from JSON
+     **Acceptance Criteria**: Use context.acceptance array from JSON
+     **Dependencies**: Use context.depends_on array from JSON
+     **Parent Context**: Use context.inherited object from JSON
+     **Artifacts**: Use context.artifacts array from JSON (synthesis specifications, brainstorming outputs)
+     **Target Files**: Use flow_control.target_files array from JSON
+     **Implementation Approach**: Use flow_control.implementation_approach object from JSON (with artifact integration)
+
+     ## STEP 5: Session Context (Provided by workflow:execute)
      **Workflow Directory**: {session.workflow_dir}
      **TODO List Path**: {session.todo_list_path}
      **Summaries Directory**: {session.summaries_dir}
      **Task JSON Path**: {session.task_json_path}
+     **Flow Context**: {flow_context.step_outputs}
 
-     ### Dependencies & Context
-     **Dependencies**: {context.depends_on}
-     **Inherited Context**: {context.inherited}
-     **Previous Outputs**: {flow_context.step_outputs}
+     ## STEP 6: Agent Completion Requirements
+     1. **Load Task JSON**: Read and validate complete task structure
+     2. **Execute Flow Control**: Run all pre_analysis steps if present
+     3. **Implement Solution**: Follow implementation_approach from JSON
+     4. **Update Progress**: Mark task status in JSON as completed
+     5. **Update TODO List**: Update TODO_LIST.md at provided path
+     6. **Generate Summary**: Create completion summary in summaries directory
+     7. **Check Workflow Complete**: After task completion, check if all workflow tasks done
+     8. **Auto-Complete Session**: If all tasks completed, call SlashCommand(\"/workflow:session:complete\")
 
-     ## Completion Requirements
-     1. Execute all flow control steps if present
-     2. Implement according to acceptance criteria
-     3. Update TODO_LIST.md at provided path
-     4. Generate summary in summaries directory
-     5. Mark task as completed in task JSON",
-     description="{task_description}")
+     **JSON UPDATE COMMAND**:
+     Update task status to completed using jq:
+     jq '.status = \"completed\"' {session.task_json_path} > temp.json && mv temp.json {session.task_json_path}
+
+     **WORKFLOW COMPLETION CHECK**:
+     After updating task status, check if workflow is complete:
+     total_tasks=\$(find .workflow/*/\.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+     completed_tasks=\$(find .workflow/*/\.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+     if [ \$total_tasks -eq \$completed_tasks ]; then
+       SlashCommand(command=\"/workflow:session:complete\")
+     fi"),
+     description="Execute task with full JSON loading and validation")
+```
+
+#### Agent JSON Loading Specification
+**MANDATORY AGENT PROTOCOL**: All agents must follow this exact loading sequence:
+
+1. **JSON Loading**: First action must be `cat {session.task_json_path}`
+2. **Field Validation**: Verify all 5 required fields exist: `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, `flow_control`
+3. **Structure Parsing**: Parse nested fields correctly:
+   - `meta.type` and `meta.agent` (NOT flat `task_type`)
+   - `context.requirements`, `context.focus_paths`, `context.acceptance`
+   - `context.depends_on`, `context.inherited`
+   - `flow_control.pre_analysis` array, `flow_control.target_files`
+4. **Flow Control Execution**: If `flow_control.pre_analysis` exists, execute steps sequentially
+5. **Status Management**: Update JSON status upon completion
+
+**JSON Field Reference**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-1.2",
+  "title": "Task title",
+  "status": "pending|active|completed|blocked",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
+    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": ["req1", "req2"],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/path1", "src/path2"],
+    "acceptance": ["criteria1", "criteria2"],
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-1.1"],
+    "inherited": { "from": "parent", "context": ["info"] },
+    "artifacts": [
+      {
+        "type": "synthesis_specification",
+        "source": "brainstorm_synthesis",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+        "priority": "highest",
+        "contains": "complete_integrated_specification"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "individual_role_analysis",
+        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md",
+        "priority": "low",
+        "contains": "role_specific_analysis_fallback"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
+        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification from brainstorming",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(ls .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'synthesis specification not found')",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "step_name",
+        "command": "bash_command",
+        "output_to": "variable",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional|fail|retry_once"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Implement following consolidated synthesis specification...",
+      "modification_points": ["Apply synthesis specification requirements..."]
+    },
+    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
+  }
+}
 ```
 
 #### Execution Flow
-1. **Prepare Agent Context**: Assemble complete context package
-2. **Generate Prompt**: Fill template with task and context data
-3. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with structured prompt
-4. **Monitor Execution**: Track progress and handle errors
-5. **Collect Results**: Process agent outputs and update status
+1. **Load Task JSON**: Agent reads and validates complete JSON structure
+2. **Execute Flow Control**: Agent runs pre_analysis steps if present
+3. **Prepare Implementation**: Agent uses implementation_approach from JSON
+4. **Launch Implementation**: Agent follows focus_paths and target_files
+5. **Update Status**: Agent marks JSON status as completed
+6. **Generate Summary**: Agent creates completion summary
 
 #### Agent Assignment Rules
 ```
 meta.agent specified → Use specified agent
 meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
   - "feature" → @code-developer
-  - "test" → @code-review-test-agent
-  - "review" → @code-review-agent
+  - "test-gen" → @code-developer
+  - "test-fix" → @test-fix-agent
+  - "review" → @general-purpose
   - "docs" → @doc-generator
 ```
 
@@ -307,7 +486,7 @@ meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
 |-------|-------|------------|---------|
 | No active session | No `.active-*` markers found | Create or resume session | `/workflow:plan "project"` |
 | Multiple sessions | Multiple `.active-*` markers | Select specific session | Manual choice prompt |
-| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure | `/workflow:status --validate` |
+| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure | `/workflow:session:status --validate` |
 | Missing task files | Broken task references | Regenerate tasks | `/task:create` or repair |
 
 ### Execution Phase Errors
@@ -381,7 +560,7 @@ fi
 ### Basic Usage
 ```bash
 /workflow:execute          # Execute all pending tasks autonomously
-/workflow:status           # Check progress
+/workflow:session:status           # Check progress
 /task:execute IMPL-1.2     # Execute specific task
 ```
 

.claude/commands/workflow/gemini-init.md

@@ -1,300 +0,0 @@
----
-name: gemini-init
-description: Initialize Gemini CLI configuration with .gemini config and .geminiignore based on workspace analysis
-usage: /workflow:gemini-init [--output=<path>] [--preview]
-argument-hint: [optional: output path, preview flag]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:gemini-init
-  - /workflow:gemini-init --output=.config/
-  - /workflow:gemini-init --preview
----
-
-# Gemini Initialization Command
-
-## Overview
-Initializes Gemini CLI configuration for the workspace by:
-1. Analyzing current workspace using `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to identify technology stacks
-2. Generating `.geminiignore` file with filtering rules optimized for detected technologies
-3. Creating `.gemini` configuration file with contextfilename and other settings
-
-## Core Functionality
-
-### Configuration Generation
-1. **Workspace Analysis**: Runs `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to analyze project structure
-2. **Technology Stack Detection**: Identifies tech stacks based on file extensions, directories, and configuration files
-3. **Gemini Config Creation**: Generates `.gemini` file with contextfilename and workspace-specific settings
-4. **Ignore Rules Generation**: Creates `.geminiignore` file with filtering patterns for detected technologies
-
-### Generated Files
-
-#### .gemini Configuration File
-Contains Gemini CLI contextfilename setting:
-```json
-{
-  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
-}
-```
-
-#### .geminiignore Filter File
-Uses gitignore syntax to filter files from Gemini CLI analysis
-
-### Supported Technology Stacks
-
-#### Frontend Technologies
-- **React/Next.js**: Ignores build artifacts, .next/, node_modules
-- **Vue/Nuxt**: Ignores .nuxt/, dist/, .cache/
-- **Angular**: Ignores dist/, .angular/, node_modules
-- **Webpack/Vite**: Ignores build outputs, cache directories
-
-#### Backend Technologies
-- **Node.js**: Ignores node_modules, package-lock.json, npm-debug.log
-- **Python**: Ignores __pycache__, .venv, *.pyc, .pytest_cache
-- **Java**: Ignores target/, .gradle/, *.class, .mvn/
-- **Go**: Ignores vendor/, *.exe, go.sum (when appropriate)
-- **C#/.NET**: Ignores bin/, obj/, *.dll, *.pdb
-
-#### Database & Infrastructure
-- **Docker**: Ignores .dockerignore, docker-compose.override.yml
-- **Kubernetes**: Ignores *.secret.yaml, helm charts temp files
-- **Database**: Ignores *.db, *.sqlite, database dumps
-
-### Generated Rules Structure
-
-#### Base Rules (Always Included)
-```
-# Version Control
-.git/
-.svn/
-.hg/
-
-# OS Files
-.DS_Store
-Thumbs.db
-*.tmp
-*.swp
-
-# IDE Files
-.vscode/
-.idea/
-.vs/
-
-# Logs
-*.log
-logs/
-```
-
-#### Technology-Specific Rules
-Rules are added based on detected technologies:
-
-**Node.js Projects** (package.json detected):
-```
-# Node.js
-node_modules/
-npm-debug.log*
-.npm/
-.yarn/
-package-lock.json
-yarn.lock
-.pnpm-store/
-```
-
-**Python Projects** (requirements.txt, setup.py, pyproject.toml detected):
-```
-# Python
-__pycache__/
-*.py[cod]
-.venv/
-venv/
-.pytest_cache/
-.coverage
-htmlcov/
-```
-
-**Java Projects** (pom.xml, build.gradle detected):
-```
-# Java
-target/
-.gradle/
-*.class
-*.jar
-*.war
-.mvn/
-```
-
-## Command Options
-
-### Basic Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:gemini-init
-```
-- Analyzes workspace and generates `.gemini` and `.geminiignore` in current directory
-- Creates backup of existing files if present
-- Sets contextfilename to "CLAUDE.md" by default
-
-### Preview Mode
-```bash
-/workflow:gemini-init --preview
-```
-- Shows what would be generated without creating files
-- Displays detected technologies, configuration, and ignore rules
-
-### Custom Output Path
-```bash
-/workflow:gemini-init --output=.config/
-```
-- Generates files in specified directory
-- Creates directories if they don't exist
-
-## Implementation Process
-
-### Phase 1: Workspace Analysis
-1. Execute `get_modules_by_depth.sh json` to get structured project data
-2. Parse JSON output to identify directories and files
-3. Scan for technology indicators:
-   - Configuration files (package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
-   - Directory patterns (src/, tests/, etc.)
-   - File extensions (.js, .py, .java, etc.)
-4. Detect project name from directory name or package.json
-
-### Phase 2: Technology Detection
-```bash
-# Technology detection logic
-detect_nodejs() {
-    [ -f "package.json" ] || find . -name "package.json" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -1
-}
-
-detect_python() {
-    [ -f "requirements.txt" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ] || [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || \
-    find . -name "*.py" -not -path "*/__pycache__/*" | head -1
-}
-
-detect_java() {
-    [ -f "pom.xml" ] || [ -f "build.gradle" ] || \
-    find . -name "*.java" | head -1
-}
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Configuration Generation
-1. **Gemini Config (.gemini)**:
-   - Generate simple JSON config with contextfilename setting
-   - Set contextfilename to "CLAUDE.md" by default
-
-### Phase 4: Ignore Rules Generation
-1. Start with base rules (always included)
-2. Add technology-specific rules based on detection
-3. Add workspace-specific patterns if found
-4. Sort and deduplicate rules
-
-### Phase 5: File Creation
-1. **Generate .gemini config**: Write JSON configuration file
-2. **Generate .geminiignore**: Create organized ignore file with sections
-3. **Create backups**: Backup existing files if present
-4. **Validate**: Check generated files are valid
-
-## Generated File Format
-
-```
-# .geminiignore
-# Generated by Claude Code workflow:gemini-ignore command
-# Creation date: 2024-01-15 10:30:00
-# Detected technologies: Node.js, Python, Docker
-#
-# This file uses gitignore syntax to filter files for Gemini CLI analysis
-# Edit this file to customize filtering rules for your project
-
-# ============================================================================
-# Base Rules (Always Applied)
-# ============================================================================
-
-# Version Control
-.git/
-.svn/
-.hg/
-
-# ============================================================================
-# Node.js (Detected: package.json found)
-# ============================================================================
-
-node_modules/
-npm-debug.log*
-.npm/
-yarn-error.log
-package-lock.json
-
-# ============================================================================
-# Python (Detected: requirements.txt, *.py files found)
-# ============================================================================
-
-__pycache__/
-*.py[cod]
-.venv/
-.pytest_cache/
-.coverage
-
-# ============================================================================
-# Docker (Detected: Dockerfile found)
-# ============================================================================
-
-.dockerignore
-docker-compose.override.yml
-
-# ============================================================================
-# Custom Rules (Add your project-specific rules below)
-# ============================================================================
-
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Missing Dependencies
-- If `get_modules_by_depth.sh` not found, show error with path to script
-- Gracefully handle cases where script fails
-
-### Write Permissions
-- Check write permissions before attempting file creation
-- Show clear error message if cannot write to target location
-
-### Backup Existing Files
-- If `.geminiignore` exists, create backup as `.geminiignore.backup`
-- Include timestamp in backup filename
-
-## Integration Points
-
-### Workflow Commands
-- **After `/workflow:plan`**: Suggest running gemini-ignore for better analysis
-- **Before analysis**: Recommend updating ignore patterns for cleaner results
-
-### CLI Tool Integration
-- Automatically update when new technologies detected
-- Integrate with `intelligent-tools-strategy.md` recommendations
-
-## Usage Examples
-
-### Basic Project Setup
-```bash
-# New project - initialize Gemini configuration
-/workflow:gemini-init
-
-# Preview what would be generated
-/workflow:gemini-init --preview
-
-# Generate in subdirectory
-/workflow:gemini-init --output=.config/
-```
-
-### Technology Migration
-```bash
-# After adding new tech stack (e.g., Docker)
-/workflow:gemini-init  # Regenerates both config and ignore files with new rules
-
-# Check what changed
-/workflow:gemini-init --preview  # Compare with existing configuration
-```
-
-## Key Benefits
-
-- **Automatic Detection**: No manual configuration needed
-- **Technology Aware**: Rules adapted to actual project stack
-- **Maintainable**: Clear sections for easy customization
-- **Consistent**: Follows gitignore syntax standards
-- **Safe**: Creates backups of existing files

.claude/commands/workflow/plan-verify.md

@@ -1,550 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan-verify
-description: Cross-validate action plans using gemini and codex analysis before execution
-usage: /workflow:plan-verify
-argument-hint: none
-examples:
-  - /workflow:plan-verify
-allowed-tools: Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Plan Verify Command
-
-## Overview
-Cross-validates existing workflow plans using gemini and codex analysis to ensure plan quality, feasibility, and completeness before execution. **Works between `/workflow:plan` and `/workflow:execute`** to catch potential issues early and suggest improvements.
-
-## Core Responsibilities
-- **Session Discovery**: Identify active workflow sessions with completed plans
-- **Dual Analysis**: Independent gemini and codex plan evaluation
-- **Cross-Validation**: Compare analyses to identify consensus and conflicts
-- **Modification Suggestions**: Generate actionable improvement recommendations
-- **User Approval**: Interactive approval process for suggested changes
-- **Plan Updates**: Apply approved modifications to workflow documents
-
-## Execution Philosophy
-- **Quality Assurance**: Comprehensive plan validation before implementation
-- **Dual Perspective**: Technical feasibility (codex) + strategic assessment (gemini)
-- **User Control**: All modifications require explicit user approval
-- **Non-Destructive**: Original plans preserved with versioned updates
-- **Context-Rich**: Full workflow context provided to both analysis tools
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Verification Process
-The command performs comprehensive cross-validation through:
-
-**0. Session Management** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **Active session detection**: Check `.workflow/.active-*` markers
-- **Session validation**: Ensure session has completed IMPL_PLAN.md
-- **Plan readiness check**: Verify tasks exist in `.task/` directory
-- **Context availability**: Confirm analysis artifacts are present
-
-**1. Context Preparation & Analysis Setup**
-- **Plan context loading**: Load IMPL_PLAN.md, task definitions, and analysis results
-- **Documentation gathering**: Collect relevant CLAUDE.md, README.md, and workflow docs
-- **Dependency mapping**: Analyze task relationships and constraints
-- **Validation criteria setup**: Establish evaluation framework
-
-**2. Parallel Dual Analysis** ⚠️ CRITICAL ARCHITECTURE
-- **Gemini Analysis**: Strategic and architectural plan evaluation
-- **Codex Analysis**: Technical feasibility and implementation assessment
-- **Independent execution**: Both tools analyze simultaneously with full context
-- **Comprehensive evaluation**: Each tool evaluates different aspects
-
-**3. Cross-Validation & Synthesis**
-- **Consensus identification**: Areas where both analyses agree
-- **Conflict analysis**: Discrepancies between gemini and codex evaluations
-- **Risk assessment**: Combined evaluation of potential issues
-- **Improvement opportunities**: Synthesized recommendations
-
-**4. Interactive Approval Process**
-- **Results presentation**: Clear display of findings and suggestions
-- **User decision points**: Approval/rejection of each modification category
-- **Selective application**: User controls which changes to implement
-- **Confirmation workflow**: Multi-step approval for significant changes
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Dual Analysis Architecture ⚠️ CRITICAL
-Both tools receive identical context but focus on different validation aspects:
-
-```json
-{
-  "gemini_analysis": {
-    "focus": "strategic_validation",
-    "aspects": [
-      "architectural_soundness",
-      "task_decomposition_logic",
-      "dependency_coherence",
-      "business_alignment",
-      "risk_identification"
-    ],
-    "context_sources": [
-      "IMPL_PLAN.md",
-      ".process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
-      "CLAUDE.md",
-      ".workflow/docs/"
-    ]
-  },
-  "codex_analysis": {
-    "focus": "technical_feasibility",
-    "aspects": [
-      "implementation_complexity",
-      "technical_dependencies",
-      "code_structure_assessment",
-      "testing_completeness",
-      "execution_readiness"
-    ],
-    "context_sources": [
-      ".task/*.json",
-      "target_files from flow_control",
-      "existing codebase patterns",
-      "technical documentation"
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Analysis Execution Pattern
-
-**Gemini Strategic Analysis**:
-```bash
-~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Strategic validation of workflow implementation plan
-TASK: Evaluate plan architecture, task decomposition, and business alignment
-CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-*/IMPL_PLAN.md,.workflow/WFS-*/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md,CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Strategic assessment with architectural recommendations
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/verification/gemini-strategic.txt) | Focus on strategic soundness and risk identification
-"
-```
-
-**Codex Technical Analysis**:
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Technical feasibility assessment of workflow implementation plan
-TASK: Evaluate implementation complexity, dependencies, and execution readiness
-CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-*/.task/*.json,CLAUDE.md,README.md} Target files and flow control definitions
-EXPECTED: Technical assessment with implementation recommendations
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/verification/codex-technical.txt) | Focus on technical feasibility and code quality
-" -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**Cross-Validation Analysis**:
-```bash
-~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Cross-validate and synthesize strategic and technical assessments
-TASK: Compare analyses, resolve conflicts, and generate integrated recommendations
-CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-*/.verification/gemini-analysis.md,.workflow/WFS-*/.verification/codex-analysis.md}
-EXPECTED: Synthesized recommendations with user approval framework
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/verification/cross-validation.txt) | Focus on balanced integration and user decision points
-"
-```
-
-### Cross-Validation Matrix
-
-**Validation Categories**:
-1. **Task Decomposition**: Is breakdown logical and complete?
-2. **Dependency Management**: Are task relationships correctly modeled?
-3. **Implementation Scope**: Is each task appropriately sized?
-4. **Technical Feasibility**: Are implementation approaches viable?
-5. **Context Completeness**: Do tasks have adequate context?
-6. **Testing Coverage**: Are testing requirements sufficient?
-7. **Documentation Quality**: Are requirements clear and complete?
-
-**Consensus Analysis**:
-- **Agreement Areas**: Both tools identify same strengths/issues
-- **Divergent Views**: Different perspectives requiring user decision
-- **Risk Levels**: Combined assessment of implementation risks
-- **Priority Recommendations**: Most critical improvements identified
-
-### User Approval Workflow
-
-**Interactive Approval Process**:
-1. **Results Presentation**: Show analysis summary and key findings
-2. **Category-based Approval**: Present modifications grouped by type
-3. **Impact Assessment**: Explain consequences of each change
-4. **Selective Implementation**: User chooses which changes to apply
-5. **Confirmation Steps**: Final review before plan modification
-
-**Step-by-Step User Interaction**:
-
-**Step 1: Present Analysis Summary**
-```
-## Verification Results for WFS-[session-name]
-
-### Analysis Summary
-- **Gemini Strategic Grade**: B+ (Strong architecture, minor business alignment issues)
-- **Codex Technical Grade**: A- (High implementation feasibility, good code structure)
-- **Combined Risk Level**: Medium (Dependency complexity, timeline concerns)
-- **Overall Recommendation**: Proceed with modifications
-
-### Key Findings
-✅ **Strengths Identified**: Task decomposition logical, technical approach sound
-⚠️ **Areas for Improvement**: Missing error handling, unclear success criteria
-❌ **Critical Issues**: Circular dependency in IMPL-3 → IMPL-1 chain
-```
-
-**Step 2: Category-based Modification Approval**
-```bash
-# Interactive prompts for each category
-echo "Review the following modification categories:"
-echo ""
-echo "=== CRITICAL CHANGES (Must be addressed) ==="
-read -p "1. Fix circular dependency IMPL-3 → IMPL-1? [Y/n]: " fix_dependency
-read -p "2. Add missing error handling context to IMPL-2? [Y/n]: " add_error_handling
-
-echo ""
-echo "=== IMPORTANT IMPROVEMENTS (Recommended) ==="
-read -p "3. Merge granular tasks IMPL-1.1 + IMPL-1.2? [Y/n]: " merge_tasks
-read -p "4. Enhance success criteria for IMPL-4? [Y/n]: " enhance_criteria
-
-echo ""
-echo "=== OPTIONAL ENHANCEMENTS (Nice to have) ==="
-read -p "5. Add API documentation task? [y/N]: " add_docs_task
-read -p "6. Include performance testing in IMPL-3? [y/N]: " add_perf_tests
-```
-
-**Step 3: Impact Assessment Display**
-For each approved change, show detailed impact:
-```
-Change: Merge tasks IMPL-1.1 + IMPL-1.2
-Impact:
-- Files affected: .task/IMPL-1.1.json, .task/IMPL-1.2.json → .task/IMPL-1.json
-- Dependencies: IMPL-2.depends_on changes from ["IMPL-1.1", "IMPL-1.2"] to ["IMPL-1"]
-- Estimated time: Reduces from 8h to 6h (reduced coordination overhead)
-- Risk: Low (combining related functionality)
-```
-
-**Step 4: Modification Confirmation**
-```bash
-echo "Summary of approved changes:"
-echo "✓ Fix circular dependency IMPL-3 → IMPL-1"
-echo "✓ Add error handling context to IMPL-2"
-echo "✓ Merge tasks IMPL-1.1 + IMPL-1.2"
-echo "✗ Enhance success criteria for IMPL-4 (user declined)"
-echo ""
-read -p "Apply these modifications to the workflow plan? [Y/n]: " final_approval
-
-if [[ "$final_approval" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]] || [[ -z "$final_approval" ]]; then
-  echo "Creating backups and applying modifications..."
-else
-  echo "Modifications cancelled. Original plan preserved."
-fi
-```
-
-**Approval Categories**:
-```markdown
-## Verification Results Summary
-
-### ✅ Consensus Recommendations (Both gemini and codex agree)
-- [ ] **Task Decomposition**: Merge IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2 (too granular)
-- [ ] **Dependencies**: Add missing dependency IMPL-3 → IMPL-4
-- [ ] **Context**: Enhance context.requirements for IMPL-2
-
-### ⚠️ Conflicting Assessments (gemini vs codex differ)
-- [ ] **Scope**: gemini suggests splitting IMPL-5, codex suggests keeping merged
-- [ ] **Testing**: gemini prioritizes integration tests, codex emphasizes unit tests
-
-### 🔍 Individual Tool Recommendations
-#### Gemini (Strategic)
-- [ ] **Architecture**: Consider API versioning strategy
-- [ ] **Risk**: Add rollback plan for database migrations
-
-#### Codex (Technical)
-- [ ] **Implementation**: Use existing auth patterns in /src/auth/
-- [ ] **Dependencies**: Update package.json dependencies first
-```
-
-## Document Generation & Modification
-
-**Verification Workflow**: Analysis → Cross-Validation → User Approval → Plan Updates → Versioning
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **VERIFICATION_RESULTS.md**: Complete analysis results and recommendations
-- **verification-session.json**: Analysis metadata and user decisions
-- **PLAN_MODIFICATIONS.md**: Record of approved changes
-
-**Auto-Created (if modifications approved)**:
-- **IMPL_PLAN.md.backup**: Original plan backup before modifications
-- **Updated task JSONs**: Modified .task/*.json files with improvements
-- **MODIFICATION_LOG.md**: Detailed change log with timestamps
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.verification/
-├── verification-session.json      # Analysis session metadata
-├── VERIFICATION_RESULTS.md        # Complete analysis results
-├── PLAN_MODIFICATIONS.md          # Approved changes record
-├── gemini-analysis.md             # Gemini strategic analysis
-├── codex-analysis.md              # Codex technical analysis
-├── cross-validation-matrix.md     # Comparison analysis
-└── backups/
-    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md.backup        # Original plan backup
-    └── task-backups/              # Original task JSON backups
-```
-
-### Modification Implementation
-
-**Safe Modification Process**:
-1. **Backup Creation**: Save original files before any changes
-2. **Atomic Updates**: Apply all approved changes together
-3. **Validation**: Verify modified plans are still valid
-4. **Rollback Capability**: Easy restoration if issues arise
-
-**Implementation Commands**:
-
-**Step 1: Create Backups**
-```bash
-# Create backup directory with timestamp
-backup_dir=".workflow/WFS-$session/.verification/backups/$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)"
-mkdir -p "$backup_dir/task-backups"
-
-# Backup main plan and task files
-cp IMPL_PLAN.md "$backup_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md.backup"
-cp -r .task/ "$backup_dir/task-backups/"
-
-# Create backup manifest
-echo "Backup created at $(date)" > "$backup_dir/backup-manifest.txt"
-echo "Session: $session" >> "$backup_dir/backup-manifest.txt"
-echo "Files backed up:" >> "$backup_dir/backup-manifest.txt"
-ls -la IMPL_PLAN.md .task/*.json >> "$backup_dir/backup-manifest.txt"
-```
-
-**Step 2: Apply Approved Modifications**
-```bash
-# Example: Merge tasks IMPL-1.1 + IMPL-1.2
-if [[ "$merge_tasks" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then
-  echo "Merging IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2..."
-
-  # Combine task contexts
-  jq -s '
-    {
-      "id": "IMPL-1",
-      "title": (.[0].title + " and " + .[1].title),
-      "status": "pending",
-      "meta": .[0].meta,
-      "context": {
-        "requirements": (.[0].context.requirements + " " + .[1].context.requirements),
-        "focus_paths": (.[0].context.focus_paths + .[1].context.focus_paths | unique),
-        "acceptance": (.[0].context.acceptance + .[1].context.acceptance),
-        "depends_on": (.[0].context.depends_on + .[1].context.depends_on | unique)
-      },
-      "flow_control": {
-        "target_files": (.[0].flow_control.target_files + .[1].flow_control.target_files | unique),
-        "implementation_approach": .[0].flow_control.implementation_approach
-      }
-    }
-  ' .task/IMPL-1.1.json .task/IMPL-1.2.json > .task/IMPL-1.json
-
-  # Remove old task files
-  rm .task/IMPL-1.1.json .task/IMPL-1.2.json
-
-  # Update dependent tasks
-  for task_file in .task/*.json; do
-    jq '
-      if .context.depends_on then
-        .context.depends_on = [
-          .context.depends_on[] |
-          if . == "IMPL-1.1" or . == "IMPL-1.2" then "IMPL-1"
-          else .
-          end
-        ] | unique
-      else . end
-    ' "$task_file" > "$task_file.tmp" && mv "$task_file.tmp" "$task_file"
-  done
-fi
-
-# Example: Fix circular dependency
-if [[ "$fix_dependency" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then
-  echo "Fixing circular dependency IMPL-3 → IMPL-1..."
-
-  # Remove problematic dependency
-  jq 'if .id == "IMPL-3" then .context.depends_on = (.context.depends_on - ["IMPL-1"]) else . end' \
-    .task/IMPL-3.json > .task/IMPL-3.json.tmp && mv .task/IMPL-3.json.tmp .task/IMPL-3.json
-fi
-
-# Example: Add error handling context
-if [[ "$add_error_handling" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then
-  echo "Adding error handling context to IMPL-2..."
-
-  jq '.context.requirements += " Include comprehensive error handling and user feedback for all failure scenarios."' \
-    .task/IMPL-2.json > .task/IMPL-2.json.tmp && mv .task/IMPL-2.json.tmp .task/IMPL-2.json
-fi
-```
-
-**Step 3: Validation and Cleanup**
-```bash
-# Validate modified JSON files
-echo "Validating modified task files..."
-for task_file in .task/*.json; do
-  if ! jq empty "$task_file" 2>/dev/null; then
-    echo "ERROR: Invalid JSON in $task_file - restoring backup"
-    cp "$backup_dir/task-backups/$(basename $task_file)" "$task_file"
-  else
-    echo "✓ $task_file is valid"
-  fi
-done
-
-# Update IMPL_PLAN.md with modification summary
-cat >> IMPL_PLAN.md << EOF
-
-## Plan Verification and Modifications
-
-**Verification Date**: $(date)
-**Modifications Applied**:
-$(if [[ "$merge_tasks" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then echo "- Merged IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2 for better cohesion"; fi)
-$(if [[ "$fix_dependency" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then echo "- Fixed circular dependency in IMPL-3"; fi)
-$(if [[ "$add_error_handling" =~ ^[Yy]$ ]]; then echo "- Enhanced error handling requirements in IMPL-2"; fi)
-
-**Backup Location**: $backup_dir
-**Analysis Reports**: .verification/VERIFICATION_RESULTS.md
-EOF
-
-# Generate modification log
-cat > .verification/MODIFICATION_LOG.md << EOF
-# Plan Modification Log
-
-## Session: $session
-## Date: $(date)
-
-### Applied Modifications
-$(echo "Changes applied based on cross-validation analysis")
-
-### Backup Information
-- Backup Directory: $backup_dir
-- Original Files: IMPL_PLAN.md, .task/*.json
-- Restore Command: cp $backup_dir/* ./
-
-### Validation Results
-$(echo "All modified files validated successfully")
-EOF
-
-echo "Modifications applied successfully!"
-echo "Backup created at: $backup_dir"
-echo "Modification log: .verification/MODIFICATION_LOG.md"
-```
-
-**Change Categories & Implementation**:
-
-**Task Modifications**:
-- **Task Merging**: Combine related tasks with dependency updates
-- **Task Splitting**: Divide complex tasks with new dependencies
-- **Context Enhancement**: Add missing requirements or acceptance criteria
-- **Dependency Updates**: Add/remove/modify depends_on relationships
-
-**Plan Enhancements**:
-- **Requirements Clarification**: Improve requirement definitions
-- **Success Criteria**: Add measurable acceptance criteria
-- **Risk Mitigation**: Add risk assessment and mitigation steps
-- **Documentation Updates**: Enhance context and documentation
-
-## Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers
-- **Plan validation**: Ensure active session has completed IMPL_PLAN.md
-- **Task readiness**: Verify .task/ directory contains valid task definitions
-- **Analysis prerequisites**: Confirm planning analysis artifacts exist
-- **Context isolation**: Each session maintains independent verification state
-
-## Error Handling & Recovery
-
-### Verification Phase Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| No active session | Missing `.active-*` markers | Run `/workflow:plan` first |
-| Incomplete plan | Missing IMPL_PLAN.md | Complete planning phase |
-| No task definitions | Empty .task/ directory | Regenerate tasks |
-| Analysis tool failure | Tool execution error | Retry with fallback context |
-
-### Recovery Procedures
-
-**Session Recovery**:
-```bash
-# Validate session readiness
-if [ ! -f ".workflow/$session/IMPL_PLAN.md" ]; then
-  echo "Plan incomplete - run /workflow:plan first"
-  exit 1
-fi
-
-# Check task definitions exist
-if [ ! -d ".workflow/$session/.task/" ] || [ -z "$(ls .workflow/$session/.task/)" ]; then
-  echo "No task definitions found - regenerate tasks"
-  exit 1
-fi
-```
-
-**Analysis Recovery**:
-```bash
-# Retry failed analysis with reduced context
-if [ "$GEMINI_FAILED" = "true" ]; then
-  echo "Retrying gemini analysis with minimal context..."
-fi
-
-# Use fallback analysis if tools unavailable
-if [ "$TOOLS_UNAVAILABLE" = "true" ]; then
-  echo "Using manual validation checklist..."
-fi
-```
-
-## Usage Examples & Integration
-
-### Complete Verification Workflow
-```bash
-# 1. After completing planning
-/workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
-
-# 2. Verify the plan before execution
-/workflow:verify
-
-# 3. Review and approve suggested modifications
-# (Interactive prompts guide through approval process)
-
-# 4. Execute verified plan
-/workflow:execute
-```
-
-### Common Scenarios
-
-#### Quick Verification Check
-```bash
-/workflow:verify --quick    # Basic validation without modifications
-```
-
-#### Re-verification After Changes
-```bash
-/workflow:verify --recheck  # Re-run after manual plan modifications
-```
-
-#### Verification with Custom Focus
-```bash
-/workflow:verify --focus=technical    # Emphasize technical analysis
-/workflow:verify --focus=strategic    # Emphasize strategic analysis
-```
-
-### Integration Points
-- **After Planning**: Use after `/workflow:plan` to validate created plans
-- **Before Execution**: Use before `/workflow:execute` to ensure quality
-- **Plan Iteration**: Use during iterative planning refinement
-- **Quality Assurance**: Use as standard practice for complex workflows
-
-### Key Benefits
-- **Early Issue Detection**: Catch problems before implementation starts
-- **Dual Perspective**: Both strategic and technical validation
-- **Quality Assurance**: Systematic plan evaluation and improvement
-- **Risk Mitigation**: Identify potential issues and dependencies
-- **User Control**: All changes require explicit approval
-- **Non-Destructive**: Original plans preserved with full rollback capability
-
-## Quality Standards
-
-### Analysis Excellence
-- **Comprehensive Context**: Both tools receive complete workflow context
-- **Independent Analysis**: Tools analyze separately to avoid bias
-- **Focused Evaluation**: Each tool evaluates its domain expertise
-- **Objective Assessment**: Clear criteria and measurable recommendations
-
-### User Experience Excellence
-- **Clear Presentation**: Results displayed in actionable format
-- **Informed Decisions**: Impact assessment for all suggested changes
-- **Selective Control**: Granular approval of individual modifications
-- **Safe Operations**: Full backup and rollback capability
-- **Transparent Process**: Complete audit trail of all changes

.claude/commands/workflow/plan.md

@@ -1,308 +1,300 @@
 ---
 name: plan
-description: Create implementation plans with intelligent input detection
-usage: /workflow:plan <input>
-argument-hint: "text description"|file.md|ISS-001
+description: Orchestrate 4-phase planning workflow by executing commands and passing context between phases
+usage: /workflow:plan [--agent] <input>
+argument-hint: "[--agent] \"text description\"|file.md|ISS-001"
 examples:
   - /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
+  - /workflow:plan --agent "Build authentication system"
   - /workflow:plan requirements.md
   - /workflow:plan ISS-001
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
-# Workflow Plan Command
+# Workflow Plan Command (/workflow:plan)
 
-## 🚀 MCP Tools Integration (NEW!)
+## Coordinator Role
 
-**Enhanced with MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools for advanced codebase analysis:**
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 4 slash commands in sequence, parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution through **automatic continuation**.
 
-### Required MCP Servers
-1. **Exa MCP Server** - External API patterns and examples
-   - Repository: https://github.com/exa-labs/exa-mcp-server
-   - Function: `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa()` - Get external best practices
+**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow**:
 
-2. **Code Index MCP** - Internal codebase exploration
-   - Repository: https://github.com/johnhuang316/code-index-mcp
-   - Functions:
-     - `mcp__code-index__find_files()` - File pattern matching
-     - `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Advanced code search
+This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes, reports its output to you, then **immediately and automatically** proceeds to the next phase without requiring any user intervention.
 
-### Installation & Setup
-Please install these MCP servers to enable enhanced codebase analysis. The workflow will automatically use them when available.
+1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:plan "task"`
+2. **Phase 1 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
+3. **Phase 2 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
+4. **Phase 3 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
+5. **Phase 4 executes** → Reports final summary
 
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:plan <input>
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status
+- After each phase completion, automatically executes next pending phase
+- **No user action required** - workflow runs end-to-end autonomously
+- Progress updates shown at each phase for visibility
+
+**Execution Modes**:
+- **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate`
+- **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent`
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files, analyze structure, or gather context before Phase 1
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command's output for next phase
+4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+
+## 4-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Session Discovery
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
+
+**Task Description Structure**:
+```
+GOAL: [Clear, concise objective]
+SCOPE: [What's included/excluded]
+CONTEXT: [Relevant background or constraints]
 ```
 
-## Input Detection
-- **Files**: `.md/.txt/.json/.yaml/.yml` → Reads content and extracts requirements
-- **Issues**: `ISS-*`, `ISSUE-*`, `*-request-*` → Loads issue data and acceptance criteria
-- **Text**: Everything else → Parses natural language requirements
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Analysis & Planning Process
-The command performs comprehensive analysis through:
-
-**0. Pre-Analysis Documentation Check** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **Selective documentation loading based on task requirements**:
-  - **Always check**: `.workflow/docs/README.md` - System navigation and module index
-  - **For architecture tasks**: `.workflow/docs/architecture/system-design.md`, `module-map.md`
-  - **For specific modules**: `.workflow/docs/modules/[relevant-module]/overview.md`
-  - **For API tasks**: `.workflow/docs/api/unified-api.md`
-- **Context-driven selection**: Only load documentation relevant to the specific task scope
-- **Foundation for analysis**: Use relevant docs to understand affected components and dependencies
-
-**1. Context Gathering & Intelligence Selection**
-- Reading relevant CLAUDE.md documentation based on task requirements
-- Automatic tool assignment based on complexity:
-  - **Simple tasks** (≤3 modules): Direct CLI tools with intelligent path navigation and multi-round analysis
-    ```bash
-    # Analyze specific directory
-    cd "src/auth" && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-    PURPOSE: Analyze authentication patterns
-    TASK: Review auth implementation for security patterns
-    CONTEXT: Focus on JWT handling and user validation
-    EXPECTED: Security assessment and recommendations
-    RULES: Focus on security vulnerabilities and best practices
-    "
-
-    # Implement in specific directory
-    codex -C src/components --full-auto exec "
-    PURPOSE: Create user profile component
-    TASK: Build responsive profile component with form validation
-    CONTEXT: Use existing component patterns
-    EXPECTED: Complete component with tests
-    RULES: Follow existing component architecture
-    " -s danger-full-access
-    ```
-  - **Complex tasks** (>3 modules): Specialized task agents with autonomous CLI tool orchestration and cross-module coordination
-- Flow control integration with automatic tool selection
-
-**2. Project Structure Analysis** ⚠️ CRITICAL PRE-PLANNING STEP
-- **Documentation Context First**: Reference `.workflow/docs/` content from `/workflow:docs` command if available
-- **Complexity assessment**: Count total saturated tasks
-- **Decomposition strategy**: Flat (≤5) | Hierarchical (6-10) | Re-scope (>10)
-- **Module boundaries**: Identify relationships and dependencies using existing documentation
-- **File grouping**: Cohesive file sets and target_files generation
-- **Pattern recognition**: Existing implementations and conventions
-
-**3. Analysis Artifacts Generated**
-- **ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md**: Context analysis, codebase structure, pattern identification, task decomposition
-- **Context mapping**: Project structure, dependencies, cohesion groups
-- **Implementation strategy**: Tool selection and execution approach
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Context Management & Agent Execution
-
-**Agent Context Loading** ⚠️ CRITICAL
-The following pre_analysis steps are generated for agent execution:
-
-```json
-// Example pre_analysis steps generated by /workflow:plan for agent execution
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [
-    {
-      "step": "load_planning_context",
-      "action": "Load plan-generated analysis and context",
-      "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'planning analysis not found')",
-      "output_to": "planning_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
-      "action": "Explore codebase structure and patterns using MCP tools",
-      "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"[task_focus_patterns]\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"[relevant_patterns]\", file_pattern=\"[target_extensions]\")",
-      "output_to": "codebase_structure"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "mcp_external_context",
-      "action": "Get external API examples and best practices",
-      "command": "mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query=\"[task_technology] [task_patterns]\", tokensNum=\"dynamic\")",
-      "output_to": "external_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "load_dependencies",
-      "action": "Retrieve dependency task summaries",
-      "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[session]/.summaries/IMPL-[dependency_id]-summary.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'dependency summary not found')",
-      "output_to": "dependency_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "load_documentation",
-      "action": "Retrieve relevant documentation based on task scope and requirements",
-      "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/README.md $(if [[ \"$TASK_TYPE\" == *\"architecture\"* ]]; then echo .workflow/docs/architecture/*.md; fi) $(if [[ \"$TASK_MODULES\" ]]; then for module in $TASK_MODULES; do echo .workflow/docs/modules/$module/*.md; done; fi) $(if [[ \"$TASK_TYPE\" == *\"api\"* ]]; then echo .workflow/docs/api/*.md; fi) CLAUDE.md README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'documentation not found')",
-      "output_to": "doc_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "gather_task_context",
-      "action": "Analyze task context and dependencies without implementation",
-      "command": "bash(cd \"[task_focus_paths]\" && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze task context and patterns TASK: Review existing patterns and dependencies for '[task_title]' CONTEXT: Task ID [task_id], Focus paths: [task_focus_paths], MCP findings: [codebase_structure] [external_context] EXPECTED: Pattern analysis, dependency mapping, and architectural insights RULES: Focus on understanding existing code patterns, no implementation\")",
-      "output_to": "task_context",
-      "on_error": "fail"
-    }
-  ]
-}
+**Example**:
+```
+GOAL: Build JWT-based authentication system
+SCOPE: User registration, login, token validation
+CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 ```
 
-**Context Accumulation Guidelines**:
-Flow_control design should follow these principles:
-1. **Structure Analysis**: Project hierarchy and patterns
-2. **Dependency Mapping**: Previous task summaries → inheritance context
-3. **Task Context Generation**: Combined analysis → task.context fields
-4. **CLI Tool Analysis**: Use Gemini/Codex appropriately for pattern analysis when needed
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: `SESSION_ID: WFS-[id]` (store as `sessionId`)
 
-**MCP Integration Principles**:
-- **Code Index First**: Use `mcp__code-index__` for internal codebase exploration before external tools
-- **Exa for Context**: Use `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa` to supplement with external API patterns and examples
-- **Automatic Fallback**: If MCP tools unavailable, workflow uses traditional bash/CLI tools
-- **Enhanced Analysis**: MCP tools provide deeper codebase understanding and external best practices
+**Validation**:
+- Session ID successfully extracted
+- Session directory `.workflow/[sessionId]/` exists
 
-**Benefits of MCP Integration**:
-- **Faster Analysis**: Direct codebase indexing vs. manual file searching
-- **External Context**: Real-world API patterns and implementation examples
-- **Pattern Recognition**: Advanced code pattern matching and similarity detection
-- **Comprehensive Coverage**: Both internal code exploration and external best practice lookup
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
 
-**Implementation Approach Planning**:
-Each task's `flow_control.implementation_approach` defines execution strategy (planning phase):
+**After Phase 1**: Return to user showing Phase 1 results, then auto-continue to Phase 2
 
-1. **task_description**: Implementation strategy definition:
-   - Clear implementation goal to be executed later
-   - Planned reference to patterns from pre_analysis results
-   - Integration strategy with existing codebase
+---
 
-2. **modification_points**: Planned code modification targets:
-   - Specific code changes to be made during execution
-   - Planned use of parent task patterns via `[parent]` context
-   - Integration points with existing components via `[context]` from dependencies
+### Phase 2: Context Gathering
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
 
-3. **logic_flow**: Business logic execution plan:
-   - Step-by-step workflow to be implemented
-   - Planned data flow between components
-   - Integration points using `[inherited]` and `[shared]` context
+**Use Same Structured Description**: Pass the same structured format from Phase 1
 
-4. **target_files**: Target file specifications for execution:
-   - `src/auth/login.ts:handleLogin:75-120` (planned function and line range)
-   - `src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken` (planned function target)
-   - Must align with task's `context.focus_paths`
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
 
-**Variable Reference System**:
-- `[design]` - Results from pre_analysis steps
-- `[parent]` - Context inherited from parent tasks
-- `[context]` - Dependencies from related tasks
-- `[inherited]` - Shared context from session
-- `[shared]` - Global rules and patterns 
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: context-package.json path (store as `contextPath`)
+- Typical pattern: `.workflow/[sessionId]/.context/context-package.json`
 
-**Content Sources**:
-- Task summaries: `.workflow/WFS-[session]/.summaries/`
-- Documentation: `.workflow/docs/`, `CLAUDE.md`, `README.md`, config files
-- Analysis artifacts: `.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
-- Dependency contexts: `.workflow/WFS-[session]/.task/IMPL-*.json`
+**Validation**:
+- Context package path extracted
+- File exists and is valid JSON
 
-### Task Decomposition Standards
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
 
-**Rules**:
-- **Maximum 10 tasks**: Hard limit - exceeding requires re-scoping
-- **Function-based**: Complete functional units with related files (logic + UI + tests + config)
-- **File cohesion**: Group tightly coupled components in same task
-- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5 tasks) | Two-level (6-10 tasks) | Re-scope (>10 tasks)
+**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3
 
+---
 
-### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before any planning
-- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active sessions
-- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
-- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session to maintain context
-- **⚠️ Dependency context**: MUST read ALL previous task summary documents from selected session before planning
-- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent context and state
+### Phase 3: Intelligent Analysis
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
 
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1, `contextPath` from Phase 2
 
-**Task Patterns**:
-- ✅ **Correct (Function-based)**: `IMPL-001: User authentication system` (models + routes + components + middleware + tests)
-- ❌ **Wrong (File/step-based)**: `IMPL-001: Create database model`, `IMPL-002: Create API endpoint`
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md created
 
+**Validation**:
+- File `.workflow/[sessionId]/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` exists
+- Contains task recommendations section
 
-## Document Generation
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
 
-**Workflow**: Identifier Creation → Folder Structure → IMPL_PLAN.md → .task/IMPL-NNN.json → TODO_LIST.md
+**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing Phase 3 results, then auto-continue to Phase 4
 
-**Always Created**:
-- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Requirements, task breakdown, success criteria
-- **Session state**: Task references and paths
+---
 
-**Auto-Created (complexity > simple)**:
-- **TODO_LIST.md**: Hierarchical progress tracking
-- **.task/*.json**: Individual task definitions with flow_control
-- **.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md**: Analysis results and planning artifacts
+### Phase 4: Task Generation
 
-**Document Structure**:
+**Relationship with Brainstorm Phase**:
+- If brainstorm synthesis exists (synthesis-specification.md), Phase 3 analysis incorporates it as input
+- **synthesis-specification.md defines "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, high-level features
+- **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
+- Task generation translates high-level specifications into concrete, actionable work items
+
+**Command**:
+- Manual: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate --session [sessionId]")`
+- Agent: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")`
+
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Validation**:
+- `.workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` exists
+- `.workflow/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
+- `.workflow/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+
+**Return to User**:
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md          # Main planning document
-├── TODO_LIST.md          # Progress tracking (if complex)
-├── .process/
-│   └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md  # Analysis results and planning artifacts
-└── .task/
-    ├── IMPL-001.json     # Task definitions with flow_control
-    └── IMPL-002.json
+Planning complete for session: [sessionId]
+Tasks generated: [count]
+Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+
+✅ Recommended Next Steps:
+1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify plan quality before execution
+2. /workflow:status  # Review task breakdown
+3. /workflow:execute  # Start implementation (after verification)
+
+⚠️ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues early
 ```
 
-### IMPL_PLAN.md Structure ⚠️ REQUIRED FORMAT
+## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-**File Header** (required)：
-- **Identifier**: Unique project identifier and session ID, format WFS-[topic]
-- **Source**: Input type, e.g. "User requirements analysis"
-- **Analysis**: Analysis document reference
+```javascript
+// Initialize (before Phase 1)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute intelligent analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing intelligent analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]})
 
-**Summary** (execution overview)：
-- Concise description of core requirements and objectives
-- Technical direction and implementation approach
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute intelligent analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing intelligent analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]})
 
-**Context Analysis** (context analysis)：
-- **Project** - Project type and architectural patterns
-- **Modules** - Involved modules and component list
-- **Dependencies** - Dependency mapping and constraints
-- **Patterns** - Identified code patterns and conventions
+// Continue pattern for Phase 2, 3, 4...
+```
 
-**Task Breakdown** (task decomposition)：
-- **Task Count** - Total task count and complexity level
-- **Hierarchy** - Task organization structure (flat/hierarchical)
-- **Dependencies** - Inter-task dependency graph
+## Input Processing
 
-**Implementation Plan** (implementation plan)：
-- **Execution Strategy** - Execution strategy and methodology
-- **Resource Requirements** - Required resources and tool selection
-- **Success Criteria** - Success criteria and acceptance conditions
+**Convert User Input to Structured Format**:
 
+1. **Simple Text** → Structure it:
+   ```
+   User: "Build authentication system"
 
-## Reference Information
+   Structured:
+   GOAL: Build authentication system
+   SCOPE: Core authentication features
+   CONTEXT: New implementation
+   ```
 
-### Task JSON Schema (5-Field Architecture)
-Each task.json uses the workflow-architecture.md 5-field schema:
-- **id**: IMPL-N[.M] format (max 2 levels)
-- **title**: Descriptive task name
-- **status**: pending|active|completed|blocked|container
-- **meta**: { type, agent }
-- **context**: { requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, parent, depends_on, inherited, shared_context }
-- **flow_control**: { pre_analysis[], implementation_approach, target_files[] }
+2. **Detailed Text** → Extract components:
+   ```
+   User: "Add JWT authentication with email/password login and token refresh"
 
-### File Structure Reference
-**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
+   Structured:
+   GOAL: Implement JWT-based authentication
+   SCOPE: Email/password login, token generation, token refresh endpoints
+   CONTEXT: JWT token-based security, refresh token rotation
+   ```
 
-### Execution Integration
-Documents created for `/workflow:execute`:
-- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Context loading and requirements
-- **.task/*.json**: Agent implementation context
-- **TODO_LIST.md**: Status tracking (container tasks with ▸, leaf tasks with checkboxes)
+3. **File Reference** (e.g., `requirements.md`) → Read and structure:
+   - Read file content
+   - Extract goal, scope, requirements
+   - Format into structured description
+
+4. **Issue Reference** (e.g., `ISS-001`) → Read and structure:
+   - Read issue file
+   - Extract title as goal
+   - Extract description as scope/context
+   - Format into structured description
+
+## Data Flow
+
+```
+User Input (task description)
+    ↓
+[Convert to Structured Format]
+    ↓ Structured Description:
+    ↓   GOAL: [objective]
+    ↓   SCOPE: [boundaries]
+    ↓   CONTEXT: [background]
+    ↓
+Phase 1: session:start --auto "structured-description"
+    ↓ Output: sessionId
+    ↓ Session Memory: Previous tasks, context, artifacts
+    ↓
+Phase 2: context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + session memory + structured description
+    ↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json)
+    ↓
+Phase 3: concept-enhanced --session sessionId --context contextPath
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + session memory
+    ↓ Output: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+    ↓
+Phase 4: task-generate[--agent] --session sessionId
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md + session memory
+    ↓ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
+    ↓
+Return summary to user
+```
+
+**Session Memory Flow**: Each phase receives session ID, which provides access to:
+- Previous task summaries
+- Existing context and analysis
+- Brainstorming artifacts
+- Session-specific configuration
+
+**Structured Description Benefits**:
+- **Clarity**: Clear separation of goal, scope, and context
+- **Consistency**: Same format across all phases
+- **Traceability**: Easy to track what was requested
+- **Precision**: Better context gathering and analysis
 
 ## Error Handling
-- **Vague input**: Auto-reject ("fix it", "make better", etc.)
-- **File not found**: Clear suggestions
-- **>10 tasks**: Force re-scoping into iterations
 
-## Planning-Only Constraint
-This command creates implementation plans but does not execute them.
-Use `/workflow:execute` for actual implementation.
+- **Parsing Failure**: If output parsing fails, retry command once, then report error
+- **Validation Failure**: If validation fails, report which file/data is missing
+- **Command Failure**: Keep phase `in_progress`, report error to user, do not proceed to next phase
 
+## Coordinator Checklist
 
+✅ **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
+✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command
+✅ Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
+✅ Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
+✅ Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
+✅ Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
+✅ Pass session ID and context path to Phase 3 command
+✅ Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md after Phase 3
+✅ Select correct Phase 4 command based on --agent flag
+✅ Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
+✅ Verify all Phase 4 outputs
+✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
+✅ After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
+
+## Structure Template Reference
+
+**Minimal Structure**:
+```
+GOAL: [What to achieve]
+SCOPE: [What's included]
+CONTEXT: [Relevant info]
+```
+
+**Detailed Structure** (optional, when more context available):
+```
+GOAL: [Primary objective]
+SCOPE: [Included features/components]
+CONTEXT: [Existing system, constraints, dependencies]
+REQUIREMENTS: [Specific technical requirements]
+CONSTRAINTS: [Limitations or boundaries]
+```
+
+**Usage in Commands**:
+```bash
+# Phase 1
+/workflow:session:start --auto "GOAL: Build authentication\nSCOPE: JWT, login, registration\nCONTEXT: REST API"
+
+# Phase 2
+/workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-123 "GOAL: Build authentication\nSCOPE: JWT, login, registration\nCONTEXT: REST API"
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/resume.md

@@ -1,419 +1,98 @@
 ---
 name: resume
-description: Intelligent workflow resumption with automatic interruption point detection
-usage: /workflow:resume [options]
-argument-hint: [--from TASK-ID] [--retry] [--skip TASK-ID] [--force]
+description: Intelligent workflow session resumption with automatic progress analysis
+usage: /workflow:resume "<session-id>"
+argument-hint: "session-id for workflow session to resume"
 examples:
-  - /workflow:resume
-  - /workflow:resume --from impl-1.2
-  - /workflow:resume --retry impl-1.1
-  - /workflow:resume --skip impl-2.1 --from impl-2.2
+  - /workflow:resume "WFS-user-auth"
+  - /workflow:resume "WFS-api-integration"
+  - /workflow:resume "WFS-database-migration"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
-# Workflow Resume Command (/workflow:resume)
-
-## Overview
-Intelligently resumes interrupted workflows with automatic detection of interruption points, context restoration, and flexible recovery strategies. Maintains execution continuity while adapting to various interruption scenarios.
-
-## Core Principles
-**File Structure:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-
-**Dependency Context Rules:**
-- **For tasks with dependencies**: MUST read previous task summary documents before resuming
-- **Context inheritance**: Use dependency summaries to maintain consistency and avoid duplicate work
+# Sequential Workflow Resume Command
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:resume [--from TASK-ID] [--retry] [--skip TASK-ID] [--force]
+/workflow:resume "<session-id>"
 ```
 
-### Recovery Options
+## Purpose
+**Sequential command coordination for workflow resumption** by first analyzing current session status, then continuing execution with special resume context. This command orchestrates intelligent session resumption through two-step process.
 
-#### Automatic Recovery (Default)
+## Command Coordination Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Status Analysis
+1. **Call status command**: Execute `/workflow:status` to analyze current session state
+2. **Verify session information**: Check session ID, progress, and current task status
+3. **Identify resume point**: Determine where workflow was interrupted
+
+### Phase 2: Resume Execution
+1. **Call execute with resume flag**: Execute `/workflow:execute --resume-session="{session-id}"`
+2. **Pass session context**: Provide analyzed session information to execute command
+3. **Direct agent execution**: Skip discovery phase, directly enter TodoWrite and agent execution
+
+## Implementation Protocol
+
+### Sequential Command Execution
 ```bash
-/workflow:resume
-```
-**Behavior**:
-- Auto-detects interruption point from task statuses
-- Resumes from first incomplete task in dependency order
-- Rebuilds agent context automatically
+# Phase 1: Analyze current session status
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:status")
 
-#### Targeted Recovery
-```bash
-/workflow:resume --from impl-1.2
-```
-**Behavior**:
-- Resumes from specific task ID
-- Validates dependencies are met
-- Updates subsequent task readiness
-
-#### Retry Failed Tasks
-```bash
-/workflow:resume --retry impl-1.1
-```
-**Behavior**:
-- Retries previously failed task
-- Analyzes failure context
-- Applies enhanced error handling
-
-#### Skip Blocked Tasks
-```bash
-/workflow:resume --skip impl-2.1 --from impl-2.2
-```
-**Behavior**:
-- Marks specified task as skipped
-- Continues execution from target task
-- Adjusts dependency chain
-
-#### Force Recovery
-```bash
-/workflow:resume --force
-```
-**Behavior**:
-- Bypasses dependency validation
-- Forces execution regardless of task states
-- For emergency recovery scenarios
-
-## Interruption Detection Logic
-
-### Session State Analysis
-```
-Interruption Analysis:
-├── Load active session from .workflow/.active-* marker
-├── Read workflow-session.json for last execution state
-├── Scan .task/ directory for task statuses
-├── Analyze TODO_LIST.md progress markers
-├── Check .summaries/ for completion records
-└── Detect interruption point and failure patterns
+# Phase 2: Resume execution with special flag
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:execute --resume-session=\"{session-id}\"")
 ```
 
-**Detection Criteria**:
-- **Normal Interruption**: Last task marked as "in_progress" without completion
-- **Failure Interruption**: Task marked as "failed" with error context
-- **Dependency Interruption**: Tasks blocked due to failed dependencies
-- **Agent Interruption**: Agent execution terminated without status update
-
-### Context Restoration Process
-```json
-{
-  "interruption_analysis": {
-    "session_id": "WFS-user-auth",
-    "last_active_task": "impl-1.2",
-    "interruption_type": "agent_timeout",
-    "interruption_time": "2025-09-15T14:30:00Z",
-    "affected_tasks": ["impl-1.2", "impl-1.3"],
-    "pending_dependencies": [],
-    "recovery_strategy": "retry_with_enhanced_context"
-  },
-  "execution_state": {
-    "completed_tasks": ["impl-1.1"],
-    "failed_tasks": [],
-    "in_progress_tasks": ["impl-1.2"],
-    "pending_tasks": ["impl-1.3", "impl-2.1"],
-    "skipped_tasks": [],
-    "blocked_tasks": []
-  }
-}
-```
-
-## Resume Execution Flow
-
-### 1. Session Discovery & Validation
-```
-Session Validation:
-├── Verify active session exists (.workflow/.active-*)
-├── Load session metadata (workflow-session.json)
-├── Validate task files integrity (.task/*.json)
-├── Check IMPL_PLAN.md consistency
-└── Rebuild execution context
-```
-
-**Validation Checks**:
-- **Session Integrity**: All required files present and readable
-- **Task Consistency**: Task JSON files match TODO_LIST.md entries
-- **Dependency Chain**: Task dependencies are logically consistent
-- **Agent Context**: Previous agent outputs available in .summaries/
-
-### 2. Interruption Point Analysis
-```pseudo
-function detect_interruption():
-  last_execution = read_session_state()
-  task_statuses = scan_task_files()
-
-  for task in dependency_order:
-    if task.status == "in_progress" and no_completion_summary():
-      return InterruptionPoint(task, "agent_interruption")
-    elif task.status == "failed":
-      return InterruptionPoint(task, "task_failure")
-    elif task.status == "pending" and dependencies_met(task):
-      return InterruptionPoint(task, "ready_to_execute")
-
-  return InterruptionPoint(null, "workflow_complete")
-```
-
-### 3. Context Reconstruction
-**Agent Context Rebuilding**:
-```bash
-# Reconstruct complete agent context from interruption point
-Task(subagent_type="code-developer",
-     prompt="[RESUME_CONTEXT] [FLOW_CONTROL] Resume impl-1.2: Implement JWT authentication
-
-     RESUMPTION CONTEXT:
-     - Interruption Type: agent_timeout
-     - Previous Attempt: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
-     - Completed Tasks: impl-1.1 (auth schema design)
-     - Current Task State: in_progress
-     - Recovery Strategy: retry_with_enhanced_context
-     - Interrupted at Flow Step: analyze_patterns
-
-     AVAILABLE CONTEXT:
-     - Completed Task Summaries: .workflow/WFS-user-auth/.summaries/impl-1.1-summary.md
-     - Previous Progress: Check .workflow/WFS-user-auth/TODO_LIST.md for partial completion
-     - Task Definition: .workflow/WFS-user-auth/.task/impl-1.2.json
-     - Session State: .workflow/WFS-user-auth/workflow-session.json
-
-     FLOW CONTROL RECOVERY:
-     Resume from step: analyze_patterns
-     $(cat .workflow/WFS-user-auth/.task/impl-1.2.json | jq -r '.flow_control.pre_analysis[] | "- Step: " + .step + " | Action: " + .action + " | Command: " + .command')
-
-     CONTEXT RECOVERY STEPS:
-     1. MANDATORY: Read previous task summary documents for all dependencies
-     2. Load dependency summaries from context.depends_on
-     3. Restore previous step outputs if available
-     4. Resume from interrupted flow control step
-     5. Execute remaining steps with accumulated context
-     6. Generate comprehensive summary with dependency outputs
-
-     Focus Paths: $(cat .workflow/WFS-user-auth/.task/impl-1.2.json | jq -r '.context.focus_paths[]')
-     Target Files: $(cat .workflow/WFS-user-auth/.task/impl-1.2.json | jq -r '.flow_control.target_files[]')
-
-     IMPORTANT:
-     1. Resume flow control from interrupted step with error recovery
-     2. Ensure context continuity through step chain
-     3. Create enhanced summary for dependent tasks
-     4. Update progress tracking upon successful completion",
-
-     description="Resume interrupted task with flow control step recovery")
-```
-
-### 4. Resume Coordination with TodoWrite
-**Always First**: Update TodoWrite with resumption plan
-```markdown
-# Workflow Resume Coordination
-*Session: WFS-[topic-slug] - RESUMPTION*
-
-## Interruption Analysis
-- **Interruption Point**: impl-1.2 (JWT implementation)
-- **Interruption Type**: agent_timeout
-- **Last Activity**: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
-- **Recovery Strategy**: retry_with_enhanced_context
-
-## Resume Execution Plan
-- [x] **TASK-001**: [Completed] Design auth schema (impl-1.1)
-- [ ] **TASK-002**: [RESUME] [Agent: code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL] Implement JWT authentication (impl-1.2)
-- [ ] **TASK-003**: [Pending] [Agent: code-review-agent] Review implementations (impl-1.3)
-- [ ] **TASK-004**: Update session state and mark workflow complete
-
-**Resume Markers**:
-- [RESUME] = Task being resumed from interruption point
-- [RETRY] = Task being retried after failure
-- [SKIP] = Task marked as skipped in recovery
-```
-
-## Recovery Strategies
-
-### Strategy Selection Matrix
-| Interruption Type | Default Strategy | Alternative Options |
-|------------------|------------------|-------------------|
-| Agent Timeout | retry_with_enhanced_context | skip_and_continue, manual_review |
-| Task Failure | analyze_and_retry | skip_task, force_continue |
-| Dependency Block | resolve_dependencies | skip_blockers, manual_intervention |
-| Context Loss | rebuild_full_context | partial_recovery, restart_from_checkpoint |
-
-### Enhanced Context Recovery
-```bash
-# For agent timeout or context loss scenarios
-1. Load all completion summaries
-2. Analyze current codebase state
-3. Compare against expected task progress
-4. Rebuild comprehensive agent context
-5. Resume with enhanced error handling
-```
-
-### Failure Analysis Recovery
-```bash
-# For task failure scenarios
-1. Parse failure logs and error context
-2. Identify root cause (code, dependency, logic)
-3. Apply targeted recovery strategy
-4. Retry with failure-specific enhancements
-5. Escalate to manual review if repeated failures
-```
-
-### Dependency Resolution Recovery
-```bash
-# For dependency block scenarios
-1. Analyze blocked dependency chain
-2. Identify minimum viable completion set
-3. Offer skip options for non-critical dependencies
-4. Resume with adjusted execution plan
-```
-
-## Status Synchronization
-
-### Task Status Updates
-```json
-// Before resumption
-{
-  "id": "impl-1.2",
-  "status": "in_progress",
-  "execution": {
-    "attempts": 1,
-    "last_attempt": "2025-09-15T14:30:00Z",
-    "interruption_reason": "agent_timeout"
-  }
-}
-
-// After successful resumption
-{
-  "id": "impl-1.2",
-  "status": "completed",
-  "execution": {
-    "attempts": 2,
-    "last_attempt": "2025-09-15T15:45:00Z",
-    "completion_time": "2025-09-15T15:45:00Z",
-    "recovery_strategy": "retry_with_enhanced_context"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Session State Updates
-```json
-{
-  "current_phase": "EXECUTE",
-  "last_execute_run": "2025-09-15T15:45:00Z",
-  "resume_count": 1,
-  "interruption_history": [
+### Progress Tracking
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
     {
-      "timestamp": "2025-09-15T14:30:00Z",
-      "reason": "agent_timeout",
-      "affected_task": "impl-1.2",
-      "recovery_strategy": "retry_with_enhanced_context"
+      content: "Analyze current session status and progress",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Analyzing session status"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Resume workflow execution with session context",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Resuming workflow execution"
     }
   ]
-}
+});
 ```
 
-## Error Handling & Recovery
+## Resume Information Flow
 
-### Detection Failures
-```bash
-# No active session
-❌ No active workflow session found
-→ Use: /workflow:session:start or /workflow:plan first
+### Status Analysis Results
+The `/workflow:status` command provides:
+- **Session ID**: Current active session identifier
+- **Current Progress**: Completed, in-progress, and pending tasks
+- **Interruption Point**: Last executed task and next pending task
+- **Session State**: Overall workflow status
 
-# Corrupted session state
-⚠️ Session state corrupted or inconsistent
-→ Use: /workflow:resume --force for emergency recovery
+### Execute Command Context
+The special `--resume-session` flag tells `/workflow:execute`:
+- **Skip Discovery**: Don't search for sessions, use provided session ID
+- **Direct Execution**: Go straight to TodoWrite generation and agent launching
+- **Context Restoration**: Use existing session state and summaries
+- **Resume Point**: Continue from identified interruption point
 
-# Task dependency conflicts
-❌ Task dependency chain has conflicts
-→ Use: /workflow:resume --skip [task-id] to bypass blockers
-```
+## Error Handling
 
-### Recovery Failures
-```bash
-# Repeated task failures
-❌ Task impl-1.2 failed 3 times
-→ Manual Review Required: Check .summaries/impl-1.2-failure-analysis.md
-→ Use: /workflow:resume --skip impl-1.2 to continue
+### Session Validation Failures
+- **Session not found**: Report missing session, suggest available sessions
+- **Session inactive**: Recommend activating session first
+- **Status command fails**: Retry once, then report analysis failure
 
-# Agent context reconstruction failures
-⚠️ Cannot rebuild agent context for impl-1.2
-→ Use: /workflow:resume --force --from impl-1.3 to skip problematic task
+### Execute Resumption Failures
+- **No pending tasks**: Report workflow completion status
+- **Execute command fails**: Report resumption failure, suggest manual intervention
 
-# Critical dependency failures
-❌ Critical dependency impl-1.1 failed validation
-→ Use: /workflow:plan to regenerate tasks or manual intervention required
-```
+## Success Criteria
+1. **Status analysis complete**: Session state properly analyzed and reported
+2. **Execute command launched**: Resume execution started with proper context
+3. **Agent coordination**: TodoWrite and agent execution initiated successfully
+4. **Context preservation**: Session state and progress properly maintained
 
-## Advanced Resume Features
-
-### Step-Level Recovery
-- **Flow Control Interruption Detection**: Identify which flow control step was interrupted
-- **Step Context Restoration**: Restore accumulated context up to interruption point
-- **Partial Step Recovery**: Resume from specific flow control step
-- **Context Chain Validation**: Verify context continuity through step sequence
-
-#### Step-Level Resume Options
-```bash
-# Resume from specific flow control step
-/workflow:resume --from-step analyze_patterns impl-1.2
-
-# Retry specific step with enhanced context
-/workflow:resume --retry-step gather_context impl-1.2
-
-# Skip failing step and continue with next
-/workflow:resume --skip-step analyze_patterns impl-1.2
-```
-
-### Enhanced Context Recovery
-- **Dependency Summary Integration**: Automatic loading of prerequisite task summaries
-- **Variable State Restoration**: Restore step output variables from previous execution
-- **Command State Recovery**: Detect partial command execution and resume appropriately
-- **Error Context Preservation**: Maintain error information for improved retry strategies
-
-### Checkpoint System
-- **Step-Level Checkpoints**: Created after each successful flow control step
-- **Context State Snapshots**: Save variable states at each checkpoint
-- **Rollback Capability**: Option to resume from previous valid step checkpoint
-
-### Parallel Task Recovery
-```bash
-# Resume multiple independent tasks simultaneously
-/workflow:resume --parallel --from impl-2.1,impl-3.1
-```
-
-### Resume with Analysis Refresh
-```bash
-# Resume with updated project analysis
-/workflow:resume --refresh-analysis --from impl-1.2
-```
-
-### Conditional Resume
-```bash
-# Resume only if specific conditions are met
-/workflow:resume --if-dependencies-met --from impl-1.3
-```
-
-## Integration Points
-
-### Automatic Behaviors
-- **Interruption Detection**: Continuous monitoring during execution
-- **Context Preservation**: Automatic context saving at task boundaries
-- **Recovery Planning**: Dynamic strategy selection based on interruption type
-- **Progress Restoration**: Seamless continuation of TodoWrite coordination
-
-### Next Actions
-```bash
-# After successful resumption
-/context                     # View updated workflow status
-/workflow:execute           # Continue normal execution
-/workflow:review            # Move to review phase when complete
-```
-
-## Resume Command Workflow Integration
-
-```mermaid
-graph TD
-    A[/workflow:resume] --> B[Detect Active Session]
-    B --> C[Analyze Interruption Point]
-    C --> D[Select Recovery Strategy]
-    D --> E[Rebuild Agent Context]
-    E --> F[Update TodoWrite Plan]
-    F --> G[Execute Resume Coordination]
-    G --> H[Monitor & Update Status]
-    H --> I[Continue Normal Workflow]
-```
-
-**System ensures**: Robust workflow continuity with intelligent interruption handling and seamless recovery integration.
+---
+*Sequential command coordination for workflow session resumption*

.claude/commands/workflow/review.md

@@ -1,85 +1,272 @@
 ---
 name: review
-description: Execute review phase for quality validation
-usage: /workflow:review
-argument-hint: none
+description: Optional specialized review (security, architecture, docs) for completed implementation
+usage: /workflow:review [--type=<type>] [session-id]
+argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [session-id]"
 examples:
-  - /workflow:review
+  - /workflow:review                           # Quality review of active session
+  - /workflow:review --type=security           # Security audit of active session
+  - /workflow:review --type=architecture WFS-user-auth  # Architecture review of specific session
+  - /workflow:review --type=action-items       # Pre-deployment verification
 ---
 
-# Workflow Review Command (/workflow:review)
+### 🚀 Command Overview: `/workflow:review`
 
-## Overview
-Final phase for quality validation, testing, and completion.
+**Optional specialized review** for completed implementations. In the standard workflow, **passing tests = approved code**. Use this command only when specialized review is required (security, architecture, compliance, docs).
 
-## Core Principles
-**Session Management:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
+## Philosophy: "Tests Are the Review"
 
-## Review Process
+- ✅ **Default**: All tests pass → Code approved
+- 🔍 **Optional**: Specialized reviews for:
+  - 🔒 Security audits (vulnerabilities, auth/authz)
+  - 🏗️ Architecture compliance (patterns, technical debt)
+  - 📋 Action items verification (requirements met, acceptance criteria)
 
-1. **Validation Checks**
-   - All tasks completed
-   - Tests passing
-   - Code quality metrics
-   - Documentation complete
+## Review Types
 
-2. **Generate Review Report**
+| Type | Focus | Use Case |
+|------|-------|----------|
+| `quality` | Code quality, best practices, maintainability | Default general review |
+| `security` | Security vulnerabilities, data handling, access control | Security audits |
+| `architecture` | Architectural patterns, technical debt, design decisions | Architecture compliance |
+| `action-items` | Requirements met, acceptance criteria verified, action items completed | Pre-deployment verification |
+
+**Notes**:
+- For documentation generation, use `/workflow:tools:docs`
+- For CLAUDE.md updates, use `/update-memory-related`
+
+## Execution Template
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# Optional specialized review for completed implementation
+
+# Step 1: Session ID resolution
+if [ -n "$SESSION_ARG" ]; then
+    sessionId="$SESSION_ARG"
+else
+    sessionId=$(find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' | head -1 | sed 's/.*active-//')
+fi
+
+# Step 2: Validation
+if [ ! -d ".workflow/${sessionId}" ]; then
+    echo "❌ Session ${sessionId} not found"
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Check for completed tasks
+if [ ! -d ".workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
+    echo "❌ No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first"
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# Step 3: Determine review type (default: quality)
+review_type="${TYPE_ARG:-quality}"
+
+# Redirect docs review to specialized command
+if [ "$review_type" = "docs" ]; then
+    echo "💡 For documentation generation, please use:"
+    echo "   /workflow:tools:docs"
+    echo ""
+    echo "The docs command provides:"
+    echo "  - Hierarchical architecture documentation"
+    echo "  - API documentation generation"
+    echo "  - Documentation structure analysis"
+    exit 0
+fi
+
+# Step 4: Analysis handover → Model takes control
+# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
+```
+
+### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
+
+After bash validation, the model takes control to:
+
+1. **Load Context**: Read completed task summaries and changed files
+   ```bash
+   # Load implementation summaries
+   cat .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/IMPL-*.md
+
+   # Load test results (if available)
+   cat .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/TEST-FIX-*.md 2>/dev/null
+
+   # Get changed files
+   git log --since="$(cat .workflow/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json | jq -r .created_at)" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+   ```
+
+2. **Perform Specialized Review**: Based on `review_type`
+
+   **Security Review** (`--type=security`):
+   - Use MCP code search for security patterns:
+     ```bash
+     mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="password|token|secret|auth", file_pattern="*.{ts,js,py}")
+     mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="eval|exec|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML", file_pattern="*.{ts,js,tsx}")
+     ```
+   - Use Gemini for security analysis:
+     ```bash
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     PURPOSE: Security audit of completed implementation
+     TASK: Review code for security vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, auth/authz issues
+     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED: Security findings report with severity levels
+     RULES: Focus on OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data validation, injection risks
+     " --approval-mode yolo
+     ```
+
+   **Architecture Review** (`--type=architecture`):
+   - Use Qwen for architecture analysis:
+     ```bash
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
+     PURPOSE: Architecture compliance review
+     TASK: Evaluate adherence to architectural patterns, identify technical debt, review design decisions
+     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED: Architecture assessment with recommendations
+     RULES: Check for patterns, separation of concerns, modularity, scalability
+     " --approval-mode yolo
+     ```
+
+   **Quality Review** (`--type=quality`):
+   - Use Gemini for code quality:
+     ```bash
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     PURPOSE: Code quality and best practices review
+     TASK: Assess code readability, maintainability, adherence to best practices
+     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED: Quality assessment with improvement suggestions
+     RULES: Check for code smells, duplication, complexity, naming conventions
+     " --approval-mode yolo
+     ```
+
+   **Action Items Review** (`--type=action-items`):
+   - Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria met:
+     ```bash
+     # Load task requirements and acceptance criteria
+     find .workflow/${sessionId}/.task -name "IMPL-*.json" -exec jq -r '
+       "Task: " + .id + "\n" +
+       "Requirements: " + (.context.requirements | join(", ")) + "\n" +
+       "Acceptance: " + (.context.acceptance | join(", "))
+     ' {} \;
+
+     # Check implementation summaries against requirements
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     PURPOSE: Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria are met
+     TASK: Cross-check implementation summaries against original requirements
+     CONTEXT: @{.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED:
+     - Requirements coverage matrix
+     - Acceptance criteria verification
+     - Missing/incomplete action items
+     - Pre-deployment readiness assessment
+     RULES:
+     - Check each requirement has corresponding implementation
+     - Verify all acceptance criteria are met
+     - Flag any incomplete or missing action items
+     - Assess deployment readiness
+     " --approval-mode yolo
+     ```
+
+
+3. **Generate Review Report**: Create structured report
    ```markdown
-   # Review Report
-   
-   ## Task Completion
-   - Total: 10
-   - Completed: 10
-   - Success Rate: 100%
-   
-   ## Quality Metrics
-   - Test Coverage: 85%
-   - Code Quality: A
-   - Documentation: Complete
-   
-   ## Issues Found
-   - Minor: 2
-   - Major: 0
-   - Critical: 0
+   # Review Report: ${review_type}
+
+   **Session**: ${sessionId}
+   **Date**: $(date)
+   **Type**: ${review_type}
+
+   ## Summary
+   - Tasks Reviewed: [count IMPL tasks]
+   - Files Changed: [count files]
+   - Severity: [High/Medium/Low]
+
+   ## Findings
+
+   ### Critical Issues
+   - [Issue 1 with file:line reference]
+   - [Issue 2 with file:line reference]
+
+   ### Recommendations
+   - [Recommendation 1]
+   - [Recommendation 2]
+
+   ### Positive Observations
+   - [Good pattern observed]
+
+   ## Action Items
+   - [ ] [Action 1]
+   - [ ] [Action 2]
    ```
 
-3. **Update Session**
-   ```json
-   {
-     "current_phase": "REVIEW",
-     "phases": {
-       "REVIEW": {
-         "status": "completed",
-         "output": "REVIEW.md",
-         "test_results": {
-           "passed": 45,
-           "failed": 0,
-           "coverage": 85
-         }
-       }
-     }
-   }
+4. **Output Files**:
+   ```bash
+   # Save review report
+   Write(.workflow/${sessionId}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md)
+
+   # Update session metadata
+   # (optional) Update workflow-session.json with review status
    ```
 
-## Auto-fix (Default)
-Auto-fix is enabled by default:
-- Automatically fixes minor issues
-- Runs formatters and linters
-- Updates documentation
-- Re-runs tests
+5. **Optional: Update Memory** (if docs review or significant findings):
+   ```bash
+   # If architecture or quality issues found, suggest memory update
+   if [ "$review_type" = "architecture" ] || [ "$review_type" = "quality" ]; then
+       echo "💡 Consider updating project documentation:"
+       echo "   /update-memory-related"
+   fi
+   ```
 
-## Completion Criteria
-- All tasks marked complete
-- Tests passing (configurable threshold)
-- No critical issues
-- Documentation updated
+## Usage Examples
 
-## Output Files
-- `REVIEW.md` - Review report
-- `workflow-session.json` - Updated with results
-- `test-results.json` - Detailed test output
+```bash
+# General quality review after implementation
+/workflow:review
+
+# Security audit before deployment
+/workflow:review --type=security
+
+# Architecture review for specific session
+/workflow:review --type=architecture WFS-payment-integration
+
+# Documentation review
+/workflow:review --type=docs
+```
+
+## ✨ Features
+
+- **Simple Validation**: Check session exists and has completed tasks
+- **No Complex Orchestration**: Direct analysis, no multi-phase pipeline
+- **Specialized Reviews**: Different prompts and tools for different review types
+- **MCP Integration**: Fast code search for security and architecture patterns
+- **CLI Tool Integration**: Gemini for analysis, Qwen for architecture
+- **Structured Output**: Markdown reports with severity levels and action items
+- **Optional Memory Update**: Suggests documentation updates for significant findings
+
+## Integration with Workflow
+
+```
+Standard Workflow:
+  plan → execute → test-gen → execute ✅
+
+Optional Review (when needed):
+  plan → execute → test-gen → execute → review (security/architecture/docs)
+```
+
+**When to Use**:
+- Before production deployment (security review + action-items review)
+- After major feature (architecture review)
+- Before code freeze (quality review)
+- Pre-deployment verification (action-items review)
+
+**When NOT to Use**:
+- Regular development (tests are sufficient)
+- Simple bug fixes (test-fix-agent handles it)
+- Minor changes (update-memory-related is enough)
 
 ## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:execute` - Must complete first
-- `/task:status` - Check task completion
-- `/workflow:status` - View overall status
+
+- `/workflow:execute` - Must complete implementation first
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Primary quality gate (tests)
+- `/workflow:tools:docs` - Generate hierarchical documentation (use instead of `--type=docs`)
+- `/update-memory-related` - Update CLAUDE.md docs after architecture findings
+- `/workflow:status` - Check session status

.claude/commands/workflow/session/complete.md

@@ -2,184 +2,105 @@
 name: complete
 description: Mark the active workflow session as complete and remove active flag
 usage: /workflow:session:complete
-
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:complete
+  - /workflow:session:complete --detailed
 ---
 
 # Complete Workflow Session (/workflow:session:complete)
 
-## Purpose
+## Overview
 Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, update its status, and remove the active flag marker.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:complete
+/workflow:session:complete           # Complete current active session
+/workflow:session:complete --detailed # Show detailed completion summary
 ```
 
-## Behavior
+## Implementation Flow
 
-### Session Completion Process
-1. **Locate Active Session**: Find current active session via `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
-2. **Update Session Status**: Modify `workflow-session.json` with completion data
-3. **Remove Active Flag**: Delete `.workflow/.active-[session-name]` marker file
-4. **Generate Summary**: Display completion report and statistics
-
-### Status Updates
-Updates `workflow-session.json` with:
-- **status**: "completed"
-- **completed_at**: Current timestamp
-- **final_phase**: Current phase at completion
-- **completion_type**: "manual" (distinguishes from automatic completion)
-
-### State Preservation
-Preserves all session data:
-- Implementation plans and documents
-- Task execution history
-- Generated artifacts and reports
-- Session configuration and metadata
-
-## Completion Summary Display
-
-### Session Overview
-```
-✅ Session Completed: WFS-oauth-integration
-   Description: Implement OAuth2 authentication
-   Created: 2025-09-07 14:30:00
-   Completed: 2025-09-12 16:45:00
-   Duration: 5 days, 2 hours, 15 minutes
-   Final Phase: IMPLEMENTATION
-```
-
-### Progress Summary
-```
-📊 Session Statistics:
-   - Tasks completed: 5/5 (100%)
-   - Files modified: 12
-   - Tests created: 8
-   - Documentation updated: 3 files
-   - Average task duration: 2.5 hours
-```
-
-### Generated Artifacts
-```
-📄 Session Artifacts:
-   ✅ IMPL_PLAN.md (Complete implementation plan)
-   ✅ TODO_LIST.md (Final task status)
-   ✅ .task/ (5 completed task files)
-   📊 reports/ (Session reports available)
-```
-
-### Archive Information
-```
-🗂️  Session Archive:
-   Directory: .workflow/WFS-oauth-integration/
-   Status: Completed and archived
-   Access: Use /context WFS-oauth-integration for review
-```
-
-## No Active Session
-If no active session exists:
-```
-⚠️  No Active Session to Complete
-
-Available Options:
-- View all sessions: /workflow:session:list
-- Start new session: /workflow:session:start "task description"
-- Resume paused session: /workflow:session:resume
-```
-
-## Next Steps Suggestions
-After completion, displays contextual actions:
-```
-🎯 What's Next:
-- View session archive: /context WFS-oauth-integration
-- Start related session: /workflow:session:start "build on OAuth work"
-- Review all sessions: /workflow:session:list
-- Create project report: /workflow/report
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Common Error Scenarios
-- **No active session**: Clear message with alternatives
-- **Corrupted session state**: Validates before completion, offers recovery
-- **File system issues**: Handles permissions and access problems
-- **Incomplete tasks**: Warns about unfinished work, allows forced completion
-
-### Validation Checks
-Before completing, verifies:
-- Session directory exists and is accessible
-- `workflow-session.json` is valid and readable
-- Marker file exists and matches session
-- No critical errors in session state
-
-### Forced Completion
-For problematic sessions:
+### Step 1: Find Active Session
 ```bash
-# Option to force completion despite issues
-/workflow:session:complete --force
+ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
 ```
 
-## Integration with Workflow System
-
-### Session Lifecycle
-Completes the session workflow:
-- INIT → PLAN → IMPLEMENT → **COMPLETE**
-- Maintains session history for reference
-- Preserves all artifacts and documentation
-
-### TodoWrite Integration
-- Synchronizes final TODO state
-- Marks all remaining tasks as archived
-- Preserves task history in session directory
-
-### Context System
-- Session remains accessible via `/context <session-id>`
-- All documents and reports remain available
-- Can be referenced for future sessions
-
-## Command Variations
-
-### Basic Completion
+### Step 2: Get Session Name
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:complete
+basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//'
 ```
 
-### With Summary Options
+### Step 3: Update Session Status
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:complete --detailed    # Show detailed statistics
-/workflow:session:complete --quiet       # Minimal output
-/workflow:session:complete --force       # Force completion despite issues
+jq '.status = "completed"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
-## Session State After Completion
-
-### Directory Structure Preserved
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[session-name]/
-├── workflow-session.json    # Updated with completion data
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md            # Preserved
-├── TODO_LIST.md            # Final state preserved
-├── .task/                  # All task files preserved
-└── reports/                # Generated reports preserved
+### Step 4: Add Completion Timestamp
+```bash
+jq '.completed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
-### Session JSON Example
-```json
-{
-  "id": "WFS-oauth-integration",
-  "description": "Implement OAuth2 authentication",
-  "status": "completed",
-  "created_at": "2025-09-07T14:30:00Z",
-  "completed_at": "2025-09-12T16:45:00Z",
-  "completion_type": "manual",
-  "final_phase": "IMPLEMENTATION",
-  "tasks_completed": 5,
-  "tasks_total": 5
-}
+### Step 5: Count Final Statistics
+```bash
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
 ```
 
----
+### Step 6: Remove Active Marker
+```bash
+rm .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
+```
 
-**Result**: Current active session is marked as complete, archived, and no longer active. All session data is preserved for future reference.
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Basic Operations
+- **Find active session**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
+- **Get session name**: `basename marker | sed 's/^\.active-//'`
+- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "completed"' session.json > temp.json`
+- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.completed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
+- **Count tasks**: `find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l`
+- **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l`
+- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-session`
+
+### Completion Result
+```
+Session WFS-user-auth completed
+- Status: completed
+- Started: 2025-09-15T10:00:00Z
+- Completed: 2025-09-15T16:30:00Z
+- Duration: 6h 30m
+- Total tasks: 8
+- Completed tasks: 8
+- Success rate: 100%
+```
+
+### Detailed Summary (--detailed flag)
+```
+Session Completion Summary:
+├── Session: WFS-user-auth
+├── Project: User authentication system
+├── Total time: 6h 30m
+├── Tasks completed: 8/8 (100%)
+├── Files generated: 24 files
+├── Summaries created: 8 summaries
+├── Status: All tasks completed successfully
+└── Location: .workflow/WFS-user-auth/
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+```bash
+# No active session
+find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f 2>/dev/null || echo "No active session found"
+
+# Incomplete tasks
+task_count=$(find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l)
+summary_count=$(find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+test $task_count -eq $summary_count || echo "Warning: Not all tasks completed"
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:session:list` - View all sessions including completed
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Start new session
+- `/workflow:status` - Check completion status before completing

.claude/commands/workflow/session/list.md

@@ -2,82 +2,104 @@
 name: list
 description: List all workflow sessions with status
 usage: /workflow:session:list
+examples:
+  - /workflow:session:list
 ---
 
-# List Workflow Sessions (/workflow/session/list)
+# List Workflow Sessions (/workflow:session:list)
 
-## Purpose
+## Overview
 Display all workflow sessions with their current status, progress, and metadata.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow/session/list
+/workflow:session:list       # Show all sessions with status
 ```
 
-## Output Format
+## Implementation Flow
 
-### Active Session (Highlighted)
+### Step 1: Find All Sessions
+```bash
+ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
 ```
+
+### Step 2: Check Active Session
+```bash
+ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
+```
+
+### Step 3: Read Session Metadata
+```bash
+jq -r '.session_id, .status, .project' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
+
+### Step 4: Count Task Progress
+```bash
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+```
+
+### Step 5: Get Creation Time
+```bash
+jq -r '.created_at // "unknown"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
+
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Basic Operations
+- **List sessions**: `find .workflow/ -maxdepth 1 -type d -name "WFS-*"`
+- **Find active**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
+- **Read session data**: `jq -r '.session_id, .status' session.json`
+- **Count tasks**: `find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l`
+- **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l`
+- **Get timestamp**: `jq -r '.created_at' session.json`
+
+## Simple Output Format
+
+### Session List Display
+```
+Workflow Sessions:
+
 ✅ WFS-oauth-integration (ACTIVE)
-   Description: Implement OAuth2 authentication
-   Phase: IMPLEMENTATION
-   Created: 2025-09-07 14:30:00
-   Directory: .workflow/WFS-oauth-integration/
-   Progress: 3/5 tasks completed
+   Project: OAuth2 authentication system
+   Status: active
+   Progress: 3/8 tasks completed
+   Created: 2025-09-15T10:30:00Z
+
+⏸️ WFS-user-profile (PAUSED)
+   Project: User profile management
+   Status: paused
+   Progress: 1/5 tasks completed
+   Created: 2025-09-14T14:15:00Z
+
+📁 WFS-database-migration (COMPLETED)
+   Project: Database schema migration
+   Status: completed
+   Progress: 4/4 tasks completed
+   Created: 2025-09-13T09:00:00Z
+
+Total: 3 sessions (1 active, 1 paused, 1 completed)
 ```
 
-### Paused Sessions
-```
-⏸️  WFS-user-profile (PAUSED)
-   Description: Build user profile management
-   Phase: PLANNING  
-   Created: 2025-09-06 10:15:00
-   Last active: 2025-09-07 09:20:00
-   Directory: .workflow/WFS-user-profile/
+### Status Indicators
+- **✅**: Active session
+- **⏸️**: Paused session
+- **📁**: Completed session
+- **❌**: Error/corrupted session
+
+### Quick Commands
+```bash
+# Count all sessions
+ls .workflow/WFS-* | wc -l
+
+# Show only active
+ls .workflow/.active-* | basename | sed 's/^\.active-//'
+
+# Show recent sessions
+ls -t .workflow/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -3
 ```
 
-### Completed Sessions
-```
-✅ WFS-bug-fix-123 (COMPLETED)
-   Description: Fix login security vulnerability
-   Completed: 2025-09-05 16:45:00
-   Directory: .workflow/WFS-bug-fix-123/
-```
-
-## Status Indicators
-- **✅ ACTIVE**: Currently active session (has marker file)
-- **⏸️ PAUSED**: Session paused, can be resumed
-- **✅ COMPLETED**: Session finished successfully
-- **❌ FAILED**: Session ended with errors
-- **🔄 INTERRUPTED**: Session was interrupted unexpectedly
-
-## Session Discovery
-Searches for:
-- `.workflow/WFS-*` directories
-- Reads `workflow-session.json` from each
-- Checks for `.active-*` marker files
-- Sorts by last activity date
-
-## Quick Actions
-For each session, shows available actions:
-- **Resume**: `/workflow/session/resume` (paused sessions)
-- **Switch**: `/workflow/session/switch <session-id>`
-- **View**: `/context <session-id>`
-
-## Empty State
-If no sessions exist:
-```
-No workflow sessions found.
-
-Create a new session:
-/workflow/session/start "your task description"
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Directory access**: Handles permission issues
-- **Corrupted sessions**: Shows warning but continues listing
-- **Missing metadata**: Shows partial info with warnings
-
----
-
-**Result**: Complete overview of all workflow sessions and their current state
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Create new session
+- `/workflow:session:switch` - Switch to different session
+- `/workflow:session:status` - Detailed session info

.claude/commands/workflow/session/pause.md

@@ -2,64 +2,68 @@
 name: pause
 description: Pause the active workflow session
 usage: /workflow:session:pause
-
+examples:
+  - /workflow:session:pause
 ---
 
 # Pause Workflow Session (/workflow:session:pause)
 
-## Purpose
+## Overview
 Pause the currently active workflow session, saving all state for later resumption.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:pause
+/workflow:session:pause      # Pause current active session
 ```
 
-## Behavior
+## Implementation Flow
 
-### State Preservation
-- Saves complete session state to `workflow-session.json`
-- Preserves context across all phases
-- Maintains TodoWrite synchronization
-- Creates checkpoint timestamp
-
-### Active Session Handling
-- Removes `.workflow/.active-[session-name]` marker file
-- Session becomes paused (no longer active)
-- Other commands will work in temporary mode
-
-### Context Saved
-- Current phase and progress
-- Generated documents and artifacts
-- Task execution state
-- Agent context and history
-
-## Status Update
-Updates session status to:
-- **status**: "paused"
-- **paused_at**: Current timestamp
-- **resumable**: true
-
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Session ID that was paused
-- Current phase and progress
-- Resume instructions
-- Session directory location
-
-## Resume Instructions
-Shows how to resume:
+### Step 1: Find Active Session
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:resume        # Resume this session
-/workflow:session:list          # View all sessions
-/workflow:session:switch <id>   # Switch to different session
+ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
 ```
 
-## Error Handling
-- **No active session**: Clear message that no session is active
-- **Save errors**: Handles file system issues gracefully
-- **State corruption**: Validates session state before saving
+### Step 2: Get Session Name
+```bash
+basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//'
+```
 
----
+### Step 3: Update Session Status
+```bash
+jq '.status = "paused"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
 
-**Result**: Active session is safely paused and can be resumed later
+### Step 4: Add Pause Timestamp
+```bash
+jq '.paused_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
+
+### Step 5: Remove Active Marker
+```bash
+rm .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
+```
+
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Basic Operations
+- **Find active session**: `ls .workflow/.active-*`
+- **Get session name**: `basename marker | sed 's/^\.active-//'`
+- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "paused"' session.json > temp.json`
+- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.paused_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
+- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-session`
+
+### Pause Result
+```
+Session WFS-user-auth paused
+- Status: paused
+- Paused at: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
+- Tasks preserved: 8 tasks
+- Can resume with: /workflow:session:resume
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:session:resume` - Resume paused session
+- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all sessions including paused
+- `/workflow:session:status` - Check session state

.claude/commands/workflow/session/resume.md

@@ -2,81 +2,74 @@
 name: resume
 description: Resume the most recently paused workflow session
 usage: /workflow:session:resume
-
+examples:
+  - /workflow:session:resume
 ---
 
 # Resume Workflow Session (/workflow:session:resume)
 
-## Purpose
+## Overview
 Resume the most recently paused workflow session, restoring all context and state.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:resume
+/workflow:session:resume     # Resume most recent paused session
 ```
 
-## Resume Logic
+## Implementation Flow
 
-### Session Detection
-- Finds most recently paused session
-- Loads session state from `workflow-session.json`
-- Validates session integrity
+### Step 1: Find Paused Sessions
+```bash
+ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
+```
 
-### State Restoration
-- Creates `.workflow/.active-[session-name]` marker file
-- Loads current phase from session state
-- Restores appropriate agent context
-- Continues from exact interruption point
+### Step 2: Check Session Status
+```bash
+jq -r '.status' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
 
-### Context Continuity
-- Restores TodoWrite state
-- Loads phase-specific context
-- Maintains full audit trail
-- Preserves document references
+### Step 3: Find Most Recent Paused
+```bash
+ls -t .workflow/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -1
+```
 
-## Phase-Specific Resume
+### Step 4: Update Session Status
+```bash
+jq '.status = "active"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
 
-### Planning Phase
-- Resumes planning document generation
-- Maintains requirement analysis progress
-- Continues task breakdown where left off
+### Step 5: Add Resume Timestamp
+```bash
+jq '.resumed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
 
-### Implementation Phase  
-- Resumes task execution state
-- Maintains agent coordination
-- Continues from current task
+### Step 6: Create Active Marker
+```bash
+touch .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
+```
 
-### Review Phase
-- Resumes validation process
-- Maintains quality checks
-- Continues review workflow
+## Simple Bash Commands
 
-## Session Validation
-Before resuming, validates:
-- Session directory exists
-- Required documents present
-- State consistency
-- No corruption detected
+### Basic Operations
+- **List sessions**: `ls .workflow/WFS-*`
+- **Check status**: `jq -r '.status' session.json`
+- **Find recent**: `ls -t .workflow/*/workflow-session.json | head -1`
+- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "active"' session.json > temp.json`
+- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.resumed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
+- **Create marker**: `touch .workflow/.active-session`
 
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Resumed session ID and description
-- Current phase and progress
-- Available next actions
-- Session directory location
+### Resume Result
+```
+Session WFS-user-auth resumed
+- Status: active
+- Paused at: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
+- Resumed at: 2025-09-15T15:45:00Z
+- Ready for: /workflow:execute
+```
 
-## Error Handling
-- **No paused sessions**: Lists available sessions to switch to
-- **Corrupted session**: Attempts recovery or suggests manual repair
-- **Directory missing**: Clear error with recovery options
-- **State inconsistency**: Validates and repairs where possible
-
-## Next Actions
-After resuming:
-- Use `/context` to view current session state
-- Continue with phase-appropriate commands
-- Check TodoWrite status for next steps
-
----
-
-**Result**: Previously paused session is now active and ready to continue
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:session:pause` - Pause current session
+- `/workflow:execute` - Continue workflow execution
+- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all sessions

.claude/commands/workflow/session/start.md

@@ -1,69 +1,221 @@
 ---
 name: start
-description: Start a new workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:start "task description"
-
+description: Discover existing sessions or start a new workflow session with intelligent session management
+usage: /workflow:session:start [--auto|--new] [task_description]
+argument-hint: [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
 examples:
-  - /workflow:session:start "implement OAuth2 authentication"
-  - /workflow:session:start "fix login bug"
+  - /workflow:session:start
+  - /workflow:session:start --auto "implement OAuth2 authentication"
+  - /workflow:session:start --new "fix login bug"
 ---
 
 # Start Workflow Session (/workflow:session:start)
 
-## Purpose
-Initialize a new workflow session for the given task description.
+## Overview
+Manages workflow sessions with three operation modes: discovery (manual), auto (intelligent), and force-new.
 
-## Usage
+## Mode 1: Discovery Mode (Default)
+
+### Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow/session/start "task description"
+/workflow:session:start
 ```
 
-## Automatic Behaviors
-
-### Session Creation
-- Generates unique session ID: WFS-[topic-slug]
-- Creates `.workflow/.active-[session-name]` marker file
-- Deactivates any existing active session
-
-### Complexity Detection
-Automatically determines complexity based on task description:
-- **Simple**: Single module, <5 tasks
-- **Medium**: Multiple modules, 5-15 tasks  
-- **Complex**: Large scope, >15 tasks
-
-### Directory Structure
-Creates session directory with:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/
-├── workflow-session.json    # Session metadata
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md            # Initial planning template
-├── .task/                  # Task management
-└── reports/                # Report generation
+### Step 1: Check Active Sessions
+```bash
+bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null)
 ```
 
-### Phase Initialization
-- **Simple**: Ready for direct implementation
-- **Medium/Complex**: Ready for planning phase
+### Step 2: List All Sessions
+```bash
+bash(ls -1 .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null | head -5)
+```
 
-## Session State
-Creates `workflow-session.json` with:
-- Session ID and description
-- Current phase: INIT → PLAN
-- Document tracking
-- Task system configuration
-- Active marker reference
+### Step 3: Display Session Metadata
+```bash
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json)
+```
 
-## Next Steps
-After starting a session:
-- Use `/workflow/plan` to create implementation plan
-- Use `/workflow/execute` to begin implementation
-- Use `/context` to view session status
+### Step 4: User Decision
+Present session information and wait for user to select or create session.
 
-## Error Handling
-- **Duplicate session**: Warns if similar session exists
-- **Invalid description**: Prompts for valid task description
-- **Directory conflicts**: Handles existing directories gracefully
+**Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-[user-selected-id]`
 
----
+## Mode 2: Auto Mode (Intelligent)
 
-**Creates**: New active workflow session ready for planning and execution
+### Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:session:start --auto "task description"
+```
+
+### Step 1: Check Active Sessions Count
+```bash
+bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+```
+
+### Step 2a: No Active Sessions → Create New
+```bash
+# Generate session slug
+bash(echo "implement OAuth2 auth" | sed 's/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/-/g' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | cut -c1-50)
+
+# Create directory structure
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.process)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.task)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.summaries)
+
+# Create metadata
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-implement-oauth2-auth","project":"implement OAuth2 auth","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/workflow-session.json)
+
+# Mark as active
+bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-implement-oauth2-auth)
+```
+
+**Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-implement-oauth2-auth`
+
+### Step 2b: Single Active Session → Check Relevance
+```bash
+# Extract session ID
+bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+
+# Read project name from metadata
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json | grep -o '"project":"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+
+# Check keyword match (manual comparison)
+# If task contains project keywords → Reuse session
+# If task unrelated → Create new session (use Step 2a)
+```
+
+**Output (reuse)**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-promptmaster-platform`
+**Output (new)**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-[new-slug]`
+
+### Step 2c: Multiple Active Sessions → Use First
+```bash
+# Get first active session
+bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+
+# Output warning and session ID
+# WARNING: Multiple active sessions detected
+# SESSION_ID: WFS-first-session
+```
+
+## Mode 3: Force New Mode
+
+### Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:session:start --new "task description"
+```
+
+### Step 1: Generate Unique Session Slug
+```bash
+# Convert to slug
+bash(echo "fix login bug" | sed 's/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/-/g' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | cut -c1-50)
+
+# Check if exists, add counter if needed
+bash(ls .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug 2>/dev/null && echo "WFS-fix-login-bug-2" || echo "WFS-fix-login-bug")
+```
+
+### Step 2: Create Session Structure
+```bash
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/.process)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/.task)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/.summaries)
+```
+
+### Step 3: Create Metadata
+```bash
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-fix-login-bug","project":"fix login bug","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/workflow-session.json)
+```
+
+### Step 4: Mark Active and Clean Old Markers
+```bash
+bash(rm .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null)
+bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-fix-login-bug)
+```
+
+**Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-fix-login-bug`
+
+## Output Format Specification
+
+### Success
+```
+SESSION_ID: WFS-session-slug
+```
+
+### Error
+```
+ERROR: --auto mode requires task description
+ERROR: Failed to create session directory
+```
+
+### Analysis (Auto Mode)
+```
+ANALYSIS: Task relevance = high
+DECISION: Reusing existing session
+SESSION_ID: WFS-promptmaster-platform
+```
+
+## Command Integration
+
+### For /workflow:plan (Use Auto Mode)
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"implement OAuth2 authentication\"")
+
+# Parse session ID from output
+grep "^SESSION_ID:" | awk '{print $2}'
+```
+
+### For Interactive Workflows (Use Discovery Mode)
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start")
+```
+
+### For New Isolated Work (Use Force New Mode)
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"experimental feature\"")
+```
+
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Basic Operations
+```bash
+# Check active sessions
+bash(ls .workflow/.active-*)
+
+# List all sessions
+bash(ls .workflow/WFS-*)
+
+# Read session metadata
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/workflow-session.json)
+
+# Create session directories
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.process)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.task)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.summaries)
+
+# Mark session as active
+bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-[session-id])
+
+# Clean active markers
+bash(rm .workflow/.active-*)
+```
+
+### Generate Session Slug
+```bash
+bash(echo "Task Description" | sed 's/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/-/g' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | cut -c1-50)
+```
+
+### Create Metadata JSON
+```bash
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-test","project":"test project","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/WFS-test/workflow-session.json)
+```
+
+## Session ID Format
+- Pattern: `WFS-[lowercase-slug]`
+- Characters: `a-z`, `0-9`, `-` only
+- Max length: 50 characters
+- Uniqueness: Add numeric suffix if collision (`WFS-auth-2`, `WFS-auth-3`)
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:plan` - Uses `--auto` mode for session management
+- `/workflow:execute` - Uses discovery mode for session selection
+- `/workflow:session:status` - Shows detailed session information

.claude/commands/workflow/session/status.md

@@ -1,112 +0,0 @@
----
-name: status
-description: Show detailed status of active workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:status
-
----
-
-# Workflow Session Status (/workflow:session:status)
-
-## Purpose
-Display comprehensive status information for the currently active workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:session:status
-```
-
-## Status Display
-
-### Active Session Overview
-```
-🚀 Active Session: WFS-oauth-integration
-   Description: Implement OAuth2 authentication
-   Created: 2025-09-07 14:30:00
-   Last updated: 2025-09-08 09:15:00
-   Directory: .workflow/WFS-oauth-integration/
-```
-
-### Phase Information
-```
-📋 Current Phase: IMPLEMENTATION
-   Status: In Progress
-   Started: 2025-09-07 15:00:00
-   Progress: 60% complete
-   
-   Completed Phases: ✅ INIT ✅ PLAN
-   Current Phase: 🔄 IMPLEMENT  
-   Pending Phases: ⏳ REVIEW
-```
-
-### Task Progress
-```
-📝 Task Status (3/5 completed):
-   ✅ IMPL-001: Setup OAuth2 client configuration
-   ✅ IMPL-002: Implement Google OAuth integration  
-   🔄 IMPL-003: Add Facebook OAuth support (IN PROGRESS)
-   ⏳ IMPL-004: Create user profile mapping
-   ⏳ IMPL-005: Add OAuth security validation
-```
-
-### Document Status
-```
-📄 Generated Documents:
-   ✅ IMPL_PLAN.md (Complete)
-   ✅ TODO_LIST.md (Auto-updated)
-   📝 .task/IMPL-*.json (5 tasks)
-   📊 reports/ (Ready for generation)
-```
-
-### Session Health
-```
-🔍 Session Health: ✅ HEALTHY
-   - Marker file: ✅ Present
-   - Directory: ✅ Accessible  
-   - State file: ✅ Valid
-   - Task files: ✅ Consistent
-   - Last checkpoint: 2025-09-08 09:10:00
-```
-
-## No Active Session
-If no session is active:
-```
-⚠️  No Active Session
-
-Available Sessions:
-- WFS-user-profile (PAUSED) - Use: /workflow/session/switch WFS-user-profile
-- WFS-bug-fix-123 (COMPLETED) - Use: /context WFS-bug-fix-123
-
-Create New Session:
-/workflow:session:start "your task description"
-```
-
-## Quick Actions
-Shows contextual next steps:
-```
-🎯 Suggested Actions:
-- Continue current task: /task/execute IMPL-003
-- View full context: /context  
-- Execute workflow: /workflow/execute
-- Plan next steps: /workflow/plan
-```
-
-## Error Detection
-Identifies common issues:
-- Missing marker file
-- Corrupted session state
-- Inconsistent task files
-- Directory permission problems
-
-## Performance Info
-```
-⚡ Session Performance:
-   - Tasks completed: 3/5 (60%)
-   - Average task time: 2.5 hours
-   - Estimated completion: 2025-09-08 14:00:00
-   - Files modified: 12
-   - Tests passing: 98%
-```
-
----
-
-**Result**: Comprehensive view of active session status and health

.claude/commands/workflow/session/switch.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 name: switch
 description: Switch to a different workflow session
 usage: /workflow:session:switch <session-id>
-
+argument-hint: session-id to switch to
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:switch WFS-oauth-integration
   - /workflow:session:switch WFS-user-profile
@@ -10,76 +10,78 @@ examples:
 
 # Switch Workflow Session (/workflow:session:switch)
 
-## Purpose
+## Overview
 Switch the active session to a different workflow session.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:switch <session-id>
+/workflow:session:switch WFS-session-name     # Switch to specific session
 ```
 
-## Session Switching Process
+## Implementation Flow
 
-### Validation
-- Verifies target session exists
-- Checks session directory integrity
-- Validates session state
-
-### Active Session Handling
-- Automatically pauses currently active session
-- Saves current session state
-- Removes current `.active-*` marker file
-
-### Target Session Activation
-- Creates `.active-[target-session]` marker file
-- Updates session status to "active"
-- Loads session context and state
-
-### State Transition
-```
-Current Active → Paused (auto-saved)
-Target Session → Active (context loaded)
+### Step 1: Validate Target Session
+```bash
+test -d .workflow/WFS-target-session && echo "Session exists"
 ```
 
-## Context Loading
-After switching:
-- Loads target session's phase and progress
-- Restores appropriate agent context
-- Makes session's documents available
-- Updates TodoWrite to target session's tasks
+### Step 2: Pause Current Session
+```bash
+ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
+jq '.status = "paused"' .workflow/current-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+```
 
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Previous active session (now paused)
-- New active session details
-- Current phase and progress
-- Available next actions
+### Step 3: Remove Current Active Marker
+```bash
+rm .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null
+```
 
-## Session ID Formats
-Accepts various formats:
-- Full ID: `WFS-oauth-integration`
-- Partial match: `oauth` (if unique)
-- Index from list: `1` (from session list order)
+### Step 4: Activate Target Session
+```bash
+jq '.status = "active"' .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json
+```
 
-## Error Handling
-- **Session not found**: Lists available sessions
-- **Invalid session**: Shows session validation errors
-- **Already active**: No-op with confirmation message
-- **Switch failure**: Maintains current session, shows error
+### Step 5: Create New Active Marker
+```bash
+touch .workflow/.active-WFS-target-session
+```
 
-## Quick Reference
-After switching, shows:
-- Session description and phase
-- Recent activity and progress
-- Suggested next commands
-- Directory location
+### Step 6: Add Switch Timestamp
+```bash
+jq '.switched_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json
+```
 
-## Integration
-Commands executed after switch will:
-- Use new active session context
-- Save artifacts to new session directory
-- Update new session's state and progress
+## Simple Bash Commands
 
----
+### Basic Operations
+- **Check session exists**: `test -d .workflow/WFS-session`
+- **Find current active**: `ls .workflow/.active-*`
+- **Pause current**: `jq '.status = "paused"' session.json > temp.json`
+- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-*`
+- **Activate target**: `jq '.status = "active"' target.json > temp.json`
+- **Create marker**: `touch .workflow/.active-target`
 
-**Result**: Different session is now active and ready for work
+### Switch Result
+```
+Switched to session: WFS-oauth-integration
+- Previous: WFS-user-auth (paused)
+- Current: WFS-oauth-integration (active)
+- Switched at: 2025-09-15T15:45:00Z
+- Ready for: /workflow:execute
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+```bash
+# Session not found
+test -d .workflow/WFS-nonexistent || echo "Error: Session not found"
+
+# No sessions available
+ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null || echo "No sessions available"
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all available sessions
+- `/workflow:session:pause` - Pause current before switching
+- `/workflow:execute` - Continue with new active session

.claude/commands/workflow/status.md

@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: workflow:status
 description: Generate on-demand views from JSON task data
-usage: /workflow:status [task-id] [--format=<format>] [--validate]
-argument-hint: [optional: task-id, format, validation]
+usage: /workflow:status [task-id]
+argument-hint: [optional: task-id]
 examples:
   - /workflow:status
   - /workflow:status impl-1
-  - /workflow:status --format=hierarchy
   - /workflow:status --validate
 ---
 
@@ -15,244 +14,116 @@ examples:
 ## Overview
 Generates on-demand views from JSON task data. No synchronization needed - all views are calculated from the current state of JSON files.
 
-## Core Principles
-**Data Source:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-
-## Key Features
-
-### Pure View Generation
-- **No Sync**: Views are generated, not synchronized
-- **Always Current**: Reads latest JSON data every time
-- **No Persistence**: Views are temporary, not saved
-- **Single Source**: All data comes from JSON files only
-
-### Multiple View Formats
-- **Overview** (default): Current tasks and status
-- **Hierarchy**: Task relationships and structure
-- **Details**: Specific task information
-
 ## Usage
-
-### Default Overview
 ```bash
-/workflow:status
+/workflow:status                    # Show current workflow overview
+/workflow:status impl-1             # Show specific task details
+/workflow:status --validate         # Validate workflow integrity
 ```
 
-Generates current workflow overview:
+## Implementation Flow
+
+### Step 1: Find Active Session
+```bash
+find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -1
+```
+
+### Step 2: Load Session Data
+```bash
+cat .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+```
+
+### Step 3: Scan Task Files
+```bash
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
+```
+
+### Step 4: Generate Task Status
+```bash
+cat .workflow/WFS-session/.task/impl-1.json | jq -r '.status'
+```
+
+### Step 5: Count Task Progress
+```bash
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l
+find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+```
+
+### Step 6: Display Overview
 ```markdown
 # Workflow Overview
-**Session**: WFS-user-auth
-**Phase**: IMPLEMENT
-**Type**: medium
+**Session**: WFS-session-name
+**Progress**: 3/8 tasks completed
 
 ## Active Tasks
-- [⚠️] impl-1: Build authentication module (code-developer)
-- [⚠️] impl-2: Setup user management (code-developer)
+- [⚠️] impl-1: Current task in progress
+- [ ] impl-2: Next pending task
 
 ## Completed Tasks
-- [✅] impl-0: Project setup
-
-## Stats
-- **Total**: 8 tasks
-- **Completed**: 3
-- **Active**: 2
-- **Remaining**: 3
+- [✅] impl-0: Setup completed
 ```
 
-### Specific Task View
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Basic Operations
+- **Find active session**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
+- **Read session info**: `cat .workflow/session/workflow-session.json`
+- **List tasks**: `find .workflow/session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f`
+- **Check task status**: `cat task.json | jq -r '.status'`
+- **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f | wc -l`
+
+### Task Status Check
+- **pending**: Not started yet
+- **active**: Currently in progress
+- **completed**: Finished with summary
+- **blocked**: Waiting for dependencies
+
+### Validation Commands
 ```bash
-/workflow:status impl-1
+# Check session exists
+test -f .workflow/.active-* && echo "Session active"
+
+# Validate task files
+for f in .workflow/session/.task/*.json; do jq empty "$f" && echo "Valid: $f"; done
+
+# Check summaries match
+find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l
+find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
 ```
 
-Shows detailed task information:
-```markdown
-# Task: impl-1
+## Simple Output Format
 
-**Title**: Build authentication module
-**Status**: active
-**Agent**: @code-developer
-**Type**: feature
+### Default Overview
+```
+Session: WFS-user-auth
+Status: ACTIVE
+Progress: 5/12 tasks
 
-## Context
-- **Requirements**: JWT authentication, OAuth2 support
-- **Scope**: src/auth/*, tests/auth/*
-- **Acceptance**: Module handles JWT tokens, OAuth2 flow implemented
-- **Inherited From**: WFS-user-auth
-
-## Relations
-- **Parent**: none
-- **Subtasks**: impl-1.1, impl-1.2
-- **Dependencies**: impl-0
-
-## Execution
-- **Attempts**: 0
-- **Last Attempt**: never
-
-## Metadata
-- **Created**: 2025-09-05T10:30:00Z
-- **Updated**: 2025-09-05T10:35:00Z
+Current: impl-3 (Building API endpoints)
+Next: impl-4 (Adding authentication)
+Completed: impl-1, impl-2
 ```
 
-### Hierarchy View
-```bash
-/workflow:status --format=hierarchy
+### Task Details
+```
+Task: impl-1
+Title: Build authentication module
+Status: completed
+Agent: code-developer
+Created: 2025-09-15
+Completed: 2025-09-15
+Summary: .summaries/impl-1-summary.md
 ```
 
-Shows task relationships:
-```markdown
-# Task Hierarchy
-
-## Main Tasks
-- impl-0: Project setup ✅
-- impl-1: Build authentication module ⚠️
-  - impl-1.1: Design auth schema
-  - impl-1.2: Implement auth logic
-- impl-2: Setup user management ⚠️
-
-## Dependencies
-- impl-1 → depends on → impl-0
-- impl-2 → depends on → impl-1
+### Validation Results
 ```
-
-## View Generation Process
-
-### Data Loading
-```pseudo
-function generate_workflow_status(task_id, format):
-  // Load all current data
-  session = load_workflow_session()
-  all_tasks = load_all_task_json_files()
-
-  // Filter if specific task requested
-  if task_id:
-    target_task = find_task(all_tasks, task_id)
-    return generate_task_detail_view(target_task)
-
-  // Generate requested format
-  switch format:
-    case 'hierarchy':
-      return generate_hierarchy_view(all_tasks)
-    default:
-      return generate_overview(session, all_tasks)
-```
-
-### Real-Time Calculation
-- **Task Counts**: Calculated from JSON file status fields
-- **Relationships**: Built from JSON relations fields
-- **Status**: Read directly from current JSON state
-
-## Validation Mode
-
-### Basic Validation
-```bash
-/workflow:status --validate
-```
-
-Performs integrity checks:
-```markdown
-# Validation Results
-
-## JSON File Validation
-✅ All task JSON files are valid
-✅ Session file is valid and readable
-
-## Relationship Validation
-✅ All parent-child relationships are valid
-✅ All dependencies reference existing tasks
-✅ No circular dependencies detected
-
-## Hierarchy Validation
-✅ Task hierarchy within depth limits (max 3 levels)
-✅ All subtask references are bidirectional
-
-## Issues Found
-⚠️ impl-3: No subtasks defined (expected for leaf task)
-
-**Status**: All systems operational
-```
-
-### Validation Checks
-- **JSON Schema**: All files parse correctly
-- **References**: All task IDs exist
-- **Hierarchy**: Parent-child relationships are valid
-- **Dependencies**: No circular dependencies
-- **Depth**: Task hierarchy within limits
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Missing Files
-```bash
-❌ Session file not found
-→ Initialize new workflow session? (y/n)
-
-❌ Task impl-5 not found
-→ Available tasks: impl-1, impl-2, impl-3, impl-4
-```
-
-### Invalid Data
-```bash
-❌ Invalid JSON in impl-2.json
-→ Cannot generate view for impl-2
-→ Repair file manually or recreate task
-
-⚠️ Circular dependency detected: impl-1 → impl-2 → impl-1
-→ Task relationships may be incorrect
-```
-
-## Performance Benefits
-
-### Fast Generation
-- **No File Writes**: Only reads JSON files
-- **No Sync Logic**: No complex synchronization
-- **Instant Results**: Generate views on demand
-- **No Conflicts**: No state consistency issues
-
-### Scalability
-- **Large Task Sets**: Handles hundreds of tasks efficiently
-- **Complex Hierarchies**: No performance degradation
-- **Concurrent Access**: Multiple views can be generated simultaneously
-
-## Integration
-
-### Workflow Integration
-- Use after task creation to see current state
-- Use for debugging task relationships
-
-### Command Integration
-```bash
-# Common workflow
-/task:create "New feature"
-/workflow:status                    # Check current state
-/task:breakdown impl-1
-/workflow:status --format=hierarchy # View new structure
-/task:execute impl-1.1
-```
-
-## Output Formats
-
-### Supported Formats
-- `overview` (default): General workflow status
-- `hierarchy`: Task relationships
-- `tasks`: Simple task list
-- `details`: Comprehensive information
-
-### Custom Filtering
-```bash
-# Show only active tasks
-/workflow:status --format=tasks --filter=active
-
-# Show completed tasks only
-/workflow:status --format=tasks --filter=completed
-
-# Show tasks for specific agent
-/workflow:status --format=tasks --agent=@code-developer
+✅ Session file valid
+✅ 8 task files found
+✅ 3 summaries found
+⚠️ 5 tasks pending completion
 ```
 
 ## Related Commands
-
-- `/task:create` - Create tasks (generates JSON data)
-- `/task:execute` - Execute tasks (updates JSON data)
-- `/task:breakdown` - Create subtasks (generates more JSON data)
-- `/workflow:vibe` - Coordinate agents (uses workflow status for coordination)
-
-This workflow status system provides instant, accurate views of workflow state without any synchronization complexity or performance overhead.
+- `/workflow:execute` - Uses this for task discovery
+- `/workflow:resume` - Uses this for progress analysis
+- `/workflow:session:status` - Shows session metadata

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
+---
+name: tdd-plan
+description: Orchestrate TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chains
+usage: /workflow:tdd-plan [--agent] <input>
+argument-hint: "[--agent] \"feature description\"|file.md|ISS-001"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tdd-plan "Implement user authentication"
+  - /workflow:tdd-plan --agent requirements.md
+  - /workflow:tdd-plan ISS-001
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# TDD Workflow Plan Command (/workflow:tdd-plan)
+
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 5 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation.
+
+**Execution Modes**:
+- **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd`
+- **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --agent`
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data for next phase
+4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous output
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 7 completes (with concept verification)
+6. **TDD Context**: All descriptions include "TDD:" prefix
+7. **Quality Gate**: Phase 5 concept verification ensures clarity before task generation
+
+## 7-Phase Execution (with Concept Verification)
+
+### Phase 1: Session Discovery
+**Command**: `/workflow:session:start --auto "TDD: [structured-description]"`
+
+**TDD Structured Format**:
+```
+TDD: [Feature Name]
+GOAL: [Objective]
+SCOPE: [Included/excluded]
+CONTEXT: [Background]
+TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
+```
+
+**Parse**: Extract sessionId
+
+### Phase 2: Context Gathering
+**Command**: `/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] "TDD: [structured-description]"`
+
+**Parse**: Extract contextPath
+
+### Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis
+**Command**: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]`
+
+**Purpose**: Analyze existing codebase for:
+- Existing test patterns and conventions
+- Current test coverage
+- Related components and integration points
+- Test framework detection
+
+**Parse**: Extract testContextPath (`.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`)
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Makes TDD aware of existing environment
+- Identifies reusable test patterns
+- Prevents duplicate test creation
+- Enables integration with existing tests
+
+### Phase 4: TDD Analysis
+**Command**: `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]`
+
+**Note**: Generates ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with TDD-specific structure:
+- Feature list with testable requirements
+- Test cases for Red phase
+- Implementation requirements for Green phase
+- Refactoring opportunities
+- Task dependencies and execution order
+
+**Parse**: Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md contains TDD breakdown sections
+
+### Phase 5: Concept Verification (NEW QUALITY GATE)
+**Command**: `/workflow:concept-verify --session [sessionId]`
+
+**Purpose**: Verify conceptual clarity before TDD task generation
+- Clarify test requirements and acceptance criteria
+- Resolve ambiguities in expected behavior
+- Validate TDD approach is appropriate
+
+**Behavior**:
+- If no ambiguities found → Auto-proceed to Phase 6
+- If ambiguities exist → Interactive clarification (up to 5 questions)
+- After clarifications → Auto-proceed to Phase 6
+
+**Parse**: Verify concept verification completed (check for clarifications section in ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md or synthesis file if exists)
+
+### Phase 6: TDD Task Generation
+**Command**:
+- Manual: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]`
+- Agent: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId] --agent`
+
+**Parse**: Extract feature count, chain count, task count
+
+**Validate**:
+- IMPL_PLAN.md exists (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
+- TEST-*.json, IMPL-*.json, REFACTOR-*.json exist
+- TODO_LIST.md exists
+- IMPL tasks include test-fix-cycle configuration
+- IMPL_PLAN.md contains workflow_type: "tdd" in frontmatter
+
+### Phase 7: TDD Structure Validation & Action Plan Verification (RECOMMENDED)
+**Internal validation first, then recommend external verification**
+
+**Internal Validation**:
+1. Each feature has TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR chain
+2. Dependencies: IMPL depends_on TEST, REFACTOR depends_on IMPL
+3. Meta fields: tdd_phase correct ("red"/"green"/"refactor")
+4. Agents: TEST uses @code-review-test-agent, IMPL/REFACTOR use @code-developer
+5. IMPL tasks contain test-fix-cycle in flow_control for iterative Green phase
+
+**Return Summary**:
+```
+TDD Planning complete for session: [sessionId]
+
+Features analyzed: [N]
+TDD chains generated: [N]
+Total tasks: [3N]
+
+Structure:
+- Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
+[...]
+
+Plan:
+- Unified Implementation Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+  (includes TDD Task Chains section with workflow_type: "tdd")
+
+✅ Recommended Next Steps:
+1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify TDD plan quality
+2. /workflow:execute --session [sessionId]  # Start TDD execution
+3. /workflow:tdd-verify [sessionId]  # Post-execution TDD compliance check
+
+⚠️ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task dependencies
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize (7 phases now with concept verification)
+[
+  {content: "Execute session discovery", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing session discovery"},
+  {content: "Execute context gathering", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {content: "Execute test coverage analysis", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {content: "Execute TDD analysis", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing TDD analysis"},
+  {content: "Execute concept verification", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing concept verification"},
+  {content: "Execute TDD task generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {content: "Validate TDD structure", status: "pending", activeForm: "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+
+// Update after each phase: mark current "completed", next "in_progress"
+```
+
+## Input Processing
+
+Convert user input to TDD-structured format:
+
+**Simple text** → Add TDD context
+**Detailed text** → Extract components with TEST_FOCUS
+**File/Issue** → Read and structure with TDD
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Parsing failure**: Retry once, then report
+- **Validation failure**: Report missing/invalid data
+- **Command failure**: Keep phase in_progress, report error
+- **TDD validation failure**: Report incomplete chains or wrong dependencies
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:plan` - Standard (non-TDD) planning
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute TDD tasks
+- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Verify TDD compliance
+- `/workflow:status` - View progress
+## TDD Workflow Enhancements
+
+### Overview
+The TDD workflow has been significantly enhanced by integrating best practices from both traditional `plan --agent` and `test-gen` workflows, creating a hybrid approach that bridges the gap between idealized TDD and real-world development complexity.
+
+### Key Improvements
+
+#### 1. Test Coverage Analysis (Phase 3)
+**Adopted from test-gen workflow**
+
+Before planning TDD tasks, the workflow now analyzes the existing codebase:
+- Detects existing test patterns and conventions
+- Identifies current test coverage
+- Discovers related components and integration points
+- Detects test framework automatically
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Context-aware TDD planning
+- Avoids duplicate test creation
+- Enables integration with existing tests
+- No longer assumes greenfield scenarios
+
+#### 2. Iterative Green Phase with Test-Fix Cycle
+**Adopted from test-gen workflow**
+
+IMPL (Green phase) tasks now include automatic test-fix cycle for resilient implementation:
+
+**Enhanced IMPL Task Flow**:
+```
+1. Write minimal implementation code
+2. Execute test suite
+3. IF tests pass → Complete task ✅
+4. IF tests fail → Enter fix cycle:
+   a. Gemini diagnoses with bug-fix template
+   b. Apply fix (manual or Codex)
+   c. Retest
+   d. Repeat (max 3 iterations)
+5. IF max iterations → Auto-revert changes 🔄
+```
+
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Faster feedback within Green phase
+- ✅ Autonomous recovery from implementation errors
+- ✅ Systematic debugging with Gemini
+- ✅ Safe rollback prevents broken state
+
+#### 3. Agent-Driven Planning
+**From plan --agent workflow**
+
+Supports action-planning-agent for more autonomous TDD planning with:
+- MCP tool integration (code-index, exa)
+- Memory-first principles
+- Brainstorming artifact integration
+- Task merging over decomposition
+
+### Workflow Comparison
+
+| Aspect | Previous | Current |
+|--------|----------|---------|
+| **Phases** | 5 | 6 (test coverage analysis) |
+| **Context** | Greenfield assumption | Existing codebase aware |
+| **Green Phase** | Single implementation | Iterative with fix cycle |
+| **Failure Handling** | Manual intervention | Auto-diagnose + fix + revert |
+| **Test Analysis** | None | Deep coverage analysis |
+| **Feedback Loop** | Post-execution | During Green phase |
+
+### Migration Notes
+
+**Backward Compatibility**: ✅ Fully compatible
+- Existing TDD workflows continue to work
+- New features are additive, not breaking
+- Phase 3 can be skipped if test-context-gather not available
+
+**Session Structure**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-xxx/
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .process/
+│   ├── context-package.json
+│   ├── test-context-package.json
+│   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (enhanced with TDD breakdown)
+│   └── green-fix-iteration-*.md (fix logs)
+└── .task/
+    ├── TEST-*.json (Red phase)
+    ├── IMPL-*.json (Green phase with test-fix-cycle)
+    └── REFACTOR-*.json (Refactor phase)
+```
+
+**Configuration Options** (in IMPL tasks):
+- `meta.max_iterations`: Fix attempts (default: 3)
+- `meta.use_codex`: Auto-fix mode (default: false)
+

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-verify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
+---
+name: tdd-verify
+description: Verify TDD workflow compliance and generate quality report
+usage: /workflow:tdd-verify [session-id]
+argument-hint: "[WFS-session-id]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tdd-verify
+  - /workflow:tdd-verify WFS-auth
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*)
+---
+
+# TDD Verification Command (/workflow:tdd-verify)
+
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 4 phases to verify TDD workflow compliance, test coverage, and Red-Green-Refactor cycle execution.
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Verify TDD task chain structure
+- Analyze test coverage
+- Validate TDD cycle execution
+- Generate compliance report
+
+## 4-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Session Discovery
+**Auto-detect or use provided session**
+
+```bash
+# If session-id provided
+sessionId = argument
+
+# Else auto-detect active session
+find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' | head -1 | sed 's/.*active-//'
+```
+
+**Extract**: sessionId
+
+**Validation**: Session directory exists
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Task Chain Validation
+**Validate TDD structure using bash commands**
+
+```bash
+# Load all task JSONs
+find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json'
+
+# Extract task IDs
+find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.id' {} \;
+
+# Check dependencies
+find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name 'IMPL-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' {} \;
+find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name 'REFACTOR-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' {} \;
+
+# Check meta fields
+find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.tdd_phase' {} \;
+find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent' {} \;
+```
+
+**Validation**:
+- For each feature N, verify TEST-N.M → IMPL-N.M → REFACTOR-N.M exists
+- IMPL-N.M.context.depends_on includes TEST-N.M
+- REFACTOR-N.M.context.depends_on includes IMPL-N.M
+- TEST tasks have tdd_phase="red" and agent="@code-review-test-agent"
+- IMPL/REFACTOR tasks have tdd_phase="green"/"refactor" and agent="@code-developer"
+
+**Extract**: Chain validation report
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Test Execution Analysis
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis --session [sessionId]")`
+
+**Input**: sessionId from Phase 1
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Coverage metrics (line, branch, function percentages)
+- TDD cycle verification results
+- Compliance score
+
+**Validation**:
+- `.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/test-results.json` exists
+- `.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/coverage-report.json` exists
+- `.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md` exists
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Compliance Report Generation
+**Gemini analysis for comprehensive TDD compliance report**
+
+```bash
+cd project-root && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+PURPOSE: Generate TDD compliance report
+TASK: Analyze TDD workflow execution and generate quality report
+CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{sessionId}/.task/*.json,.workflow/{sessionId}/.summaries/*,.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md}
+EXPECTED:
+- TDD compliance score (0-100)
+- Chain completeness verification
+- Test coverage analysis summary
+- Quality recommendations
+- Red-Green-Refactor cycle validation
+- Best practices adherence assessment
+RULES: Focus on TDD best practices and workflow adherence. Be specific about violations and improvements.
+" > .workflow/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+```
+
+**Output**: TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+TDD Verification Report - Session: {sessionId}
+
+## Chain Validation
+✅ Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1 (Complete)
+✅ Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1 (Complete)
+⚠️  Feature 3: TEST-3.1 → IMPL-3.1 (Missing REFACTOR phase)
+
+## Test Execution
+✅ All TEST tasks produced failing tests
+✅ All IMPL tasks made tests pass
+✅ All REFACTOR tasks maintained green tests
+
+## Coverage Metrics
+Line Coverage: {percentage}%
+Branch Coverage: {percentage}%
+Function Coverage: {percentage}%
+
+## Compliance Score: {score}/100
+
+Detailed report: .workflow/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+
+Recommendations:
+- Complete missing REFACTOR-3.1 task
+- Consider additional edge case tests for Feature 2
+- Improve test failure message clarity in Feature 1
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize (before Phase 1)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Identify target session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Identifying target session"},
+  {"content": "Validate task chain structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating task chain structure"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test execution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test execution"},
+  {"content": "Generate compliance report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating compliance report"}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Identify target session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Identifying target session"},
+  {"content": "Validate task chain structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating task chain structure"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test execution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test execution"},
+  {"content": "Generate compliance report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating compliance report"}
+]})
+
+// Continue pattern for Phase 2, 3, 4...
+```
+
+## Validation Logic
+
+### Chain Validation Algorithm
+```
+1. Load all task JSONs from .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/
+2. Extract task IDs and group by feature number
+3. For each feature:
+   - Check TEST-N.M exists
+   - Check IMPL-N.M exists
+   - Check REFACTOR-N.M exists (optional but recommended)
+   - Verify IMPL-N.M depends_on TEST-N.M
+   - Verify REFACTOR-N.M depends_on IMPL-N.M
+   - Verify meta.tdd_phase values
+   - Verify meta.agent assignments
+4. Calculate chain completeness score
+5. Report incomplete or invalid chains
+```
+
+### Compliance Scoring
+```
+Base Score: 100 points
+
+Deductions:
+- Missing TEST task: -30 points per feature
+- Missing IMPL task: -30 points per feature
+- Missing REFACTOR task: -10 points per feature
+- Wrong dependency: -15 points per error
+- Wrong agent: -5 points per error
+- Wrong tdd_phase: -5 points per error
+- Test didn't fail initially: -10 points per feature
+- Tests didn't pass after IMPL: -20 points per feature
+- Tests broke during REFACTOR: -15 points per feature
+
+Final Score: Max(0, Base Score - Deductions)
+```
+
+## Output Files
+```
+.workflow/{session-id}/
+├── TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md     # Comprehensive compliance report ⭐
+└── .process/
+    ├── test-results.json         # From tdd-coverage-analysis
+    ├── coverage-report.json      # From tdd-coverage-analysis
+    └── tdd-cycle-report.md       # From tdd-coverage-analysis
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Session Discovery Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| No active session | No .active-* file | Provide session-id explicitly |
+| Multiple active sessions | Multiple .active-* files | Provide session-id explicitly |
+| Session not found | Invalid session-id | Check available sessions |
+
+### Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Task files missing | Incomplete planning | Run tdd-plan first |
+| Invalid JSON | Corrupted task files | Regenerate tasks |
+| Missing summaries | Tasks not executed | Execute tasks before verify |
+
+### Analysis Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Coverage tool missing | No test framework | Configure testing first |
+| Tests fail to run | Code errors | Fix errors before verify |
+| Gemini analysis fails | Token limit / API error | Retry or reduce context |
+
+## Integration & Usage
+
+### Command Chain
+- **Called After**: `/workflow:execute` (when TDD tasks completed)
+- **Calls**: `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis`, Gemini wrapper
+- **Related**: `/workflow:tdd-plan`, `/workflow:status`
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+# Auto-detect active session
+/workflow:tdd-verify
+
+# Specify session
+/workflow:tdd-verify WFS-auth
+```
+
+### When to Use
+- After completing all TDD tasks in a workflow
+- Before merging TDD workflow branch
+- For TDD process quality assessment
+- To identify missing TDD steps
+
+## TDD Compliance Report Structure
+
+```markdown
+# TDD Compliance Report - {Session ID}
+
+**Generated**: {timestamp}
+**Session**: {sessionId}
+**Workflow Type**: TDD
+
+## Executive Summary
+Overall Compliance Score: {score}/100
+Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
+
+## Chain Analysis
+
+### Feature 1: {Feature Name}
+**Status**: ✅ Complete
+**Chain**: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
+
+- ✅ **Red Phase**: Test created and failed with clear message
+- ✅ **Green Phase**: Minimal implementation made test pass
+- ✅ **Refactor Phase**: Code improved, tests remained green
+
+### Feature 2: {Feature Name}
+**Status**: ⚠️ Incomplete
+**Chain**: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 (Missing REFACTOR-2.1)
+
+- ✅ **Red Phase**: Test created and failed
+- ⚠️ **Green Phase**: Implementation seems over-engineered
+- ❌ **Refactor Phase**: Missing
+
+**Issues**:
+- REFACTOR-2.1 task not completed
+- IMPL-2.1 implementation exceeded minimal scope
+
+[Repeat for all features]
+
+## Test Coverage Analysis
+
+### Coverage Metrics
+- Line Coverage: {percentage}% {status}
+- Branch Coverage: {percentage}% {status}
+- Function Coverage: {percentage}% {status}
+
+### Coverage Gaps
+- {file}:{lines} - Uncovered error handling
+- {file}:{lines} - Uncovered edge case
+
+## TDD Cycle Validation
+
+### Red Phase (Write Failing Test)
+- ✅ {N}/{total} features had failing tests initially
+- ⚠️ Feature 3: No evidence of initial test failure
+
+### Green Phase (Make Test Pass)
+- ✅ {N}/{total} implementations made tests pass
+- ✅ All implementations minimal and focused
+
+### Refactor Phase (Improve Quality)
+- ⚠️ {N}/{total} features completed refactoring
+- ❌ Feature 2, 4: Refactoring step skipped
+
+## Best Practices Assessment
+
+### Strengths
+- Clear test descriptions
+- Good test coverage
+- Consistent naming conventions
+- Well-structured code
+
+### Areas for Improvement
+- Some implementations over-engineered in Green phase
+- Missing refactoring steps
+- Test failure messages could be more descriptive
+
+## Recommendations
+
+### High Priority
+1. Complete missing REFACTOR tasks (Features 2, 4)
+2. Verify initial test failures for Feature 3
+3. Simplify over-engineered implementations
+
+### Medium Priority
+1. Add edge case tests for Features 1, 3
+2. Improve test failure message clarity
+3. Increase branch coverage to >85%
+
+### Low Priority
+1. Add more descriptive test names
+2. Consider parameterized tests for similar scenarios
+3. Document TDD process learnings
+
+## Conclusion
+{Summary of compliance status and next steps}
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:tdd-plan` - Creates TDD workflow
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes TDD tasks
+- `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis` - Analyzes test coverage
+- `/workflow:status` - Views workflow progress

.claude/commands/workflow/test-gen.md

@@ -1,319 +1,304 @@
 ---
 name: test-gen
-description: Generate comprehensive test workflow based on completed implementation tasks
-usage: /workflow:test-gen [session-id]
-argument-hint: "WFS-session-id"
+description: Create independent test-fix workflow session by analyzing completed implementation
+usage: /workflow:test-gen [--use-codex] <source-session-id>
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] <source-session-id>"
 examples:
-  - /workflow:test-gen
   - /workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
+  - /workflow:test-gen --use-codex WFS-api-refactor
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
-# Workflow Test Generation Command
+# Workflow Test Generation Command (/workflow:test-gen)
 
-## Overview
-Automatically generates comprehensive test workflows based on completed implementation tasks. **Creates dedicated test session with full test coverage planning**, including unit tests, integration tests, and validation workflows that mirror the implementation structure.
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Creates an independent test-fix workflow session for validating a completed implementation. It reuses the standard planning toolchain with automatic cross-session context gathering.
+
+**Core Principles**:
+- **Session Isolation**: Creates new `WFS-test-[source]` session to keep verification separate from implementation
+- **Context-First**: Prioritizes gathering code changes and summaries from source session
+- **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` task, using `meta.type: "test-fix"` for agent assignment
+- **Parameter Simplification**: Tools auto-detect test session type via metadata, no manual cross-session parameters needed
+- **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` flag for automated Codex fix application
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. Initialize TodoWrite → Create test session → Parse session ID
+2. Gather cross-session context (automatic) → Parse context path
+3. Analyze implementation with concept-enhanced → Parse ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+4. Generate test task from analysis → Return summary
 
 ## Core Rules
-**Analyze completed implementation workflows to generate comprehensive test coverage workflows.**
-**Create dedicated test session with systematic test task decomposition following implementation patterns.**
 
-## Core Responsibilities
-- **Implementation Analysis**: Analyze completed tasks and their deliverables
-- **Test Coverage Planning**: Generate comprehensive test strategies for all implementations
-- **Test Workflow Creation**: Create structured test session following workflow architecture
-- **Task Decomposition**: Break down test requirements into executable test tasks
-- **Dependency Mapping**: Establish test dependencies based on implementation relationships
-- **Agent Assignment**: Assign appropriate test agents for different test types
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 test session creation
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files or analyze before Phase 1
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase for next phase
+4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 4 completes (execution triggered separately)
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+7. **Automatic Detection**: context-gather auto-detects test session and gathers source session context
+8. **Parse --use-codex Flag**: Extract flag from arguments and pass to Phase 4 (test-task-generate)
 
-## Execution Philosophy
-- **Coverage-driven**: Ensure all implemented features have corresponding tests
-- **Implementation-aware**: Tests reflect actual implementation patterns and dependencies
-- **Systematic approach**: Follow established workflow patterns for test planning
-- **Agent-optimized**: Assign specialized agents for different test types
-- **Continuous validation**: Include ongoing test execution and maintenance tasks
+## 5-Phase Execution
 
-## Test Generation Lifecycle
+### Phase 1: Create Test Session
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]\"")`
 
-### Phase 1: Implementation Discovery
-1. **Session Analysis**: Identify active or recently completed implementation session
-2. **Task Analysis**: Parse completed IMPL-* tasks and their deliverables
-3. **Code Analysis**: Examine implemented files and functionality
-4. **Pattern Recognition**: Identify testing requirements from implementation patterns
+**Input**: `sourceSessionId` from user argument (e.g., `WFS-user-auth`)
 
-### Phase 2: Test Strategy Planning
-1. **Coverage Mapping**: Map implementation components to test requirements
-2. **Test Type Classification**: Categorize tests (unit, integration, e2e, performance)
-3. **Dependency Analysis**: Establish test execution dependencies
-4. **Tool Selection**: Choose appropriate testing frameworks and tools
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Creates new session with pattern `WFS-test-[source-slug]` (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
+- Writes metadata to `workflow-session.json`:
+  - `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+  - `source_session_id: "[sourceSessionId]"`
+- Returns new session ID for subsequent phases
 
-### Phase 3: Test Workflow Creation
-1. **Session Creation**: Create dedicated test session `WFS-test-[base-session]`
-2. **Plan Generation**: Create TEST_PLAN.md with comprehensive test strategy
-3. **Task Decomposition**: Generate TEST-* task definitions following workflow patterns
-4. **Agent Assignment**: Assign specialized test agents for execution
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: new test session ID (store as `testSessionId`)
+- Pattern: `WFS-test-[slug]`
 
-### Phase 4: Test Session Setup
-1. **Structure Creation**: Establish test workflow directory structure
-2. **Context Preparation**: Link test tasks to implementation context
-3. **Flow Control Setup**: Configure test execution flow and dependencies
-4. **Documentation Generation**: Create test documentation and tracking files
+**Validation**:
+- Source session `.workflow/[sourceSessionId]/` exists
+- Source session has completed IMPL tasks (`.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md`)
+- New test session directory created
+- Metadata includes `workflow_type` and `source_session_id`
 
-## Test Discovery & Analysis Process
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
 
-### Implementation Analysis
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1 (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Load source session implementation context and summaries
+- Analyze test coverage using MCP tools (find existing tests)
+- Identify files requiring tests (coverage gaps)
+- Detect test framework and conventions
+- Generate `test-context-package.json`
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: test context package path (store as `testContextPath`)
+- Pattern: `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`
+
+**Validation**:
+- Test context package created
+- Contains source session summaries
+- Includes coverage gap analysis
+- Test framework detected
+- Test conventions documented
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [testContextPath]")`
+
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `testContextPath` from Phase 2
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Use Gemini to analyze coverage gaps and implementation context
+- Study existing test patterns and conventions
+- Generate test requirements for each missing test file
+- Design test generation strategy
+- Generate `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` created
+- Contains test requirements and generation strategy
+- Lists test files to create with specifications
+
+**Validation**:
+- TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md exists with complete sections:
+  - Coverage Assessment
+  - Test Framework & Conventions
+  - Test Requirements by File
+  - Test Generation Strategy
+  - Implementation Targets (test files to create)
+  - Success Criteria
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `--use-codex` flag (if present in original command)
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3
+- Extract test requirements and generation strategy
+- Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
+  - **IMPL-001.json**: Test Generation task (calls @code-developer)
+  - **IMPL-002.json**: Test Execution and Fix Cycle task (calls @test-fix-agent)
+- Generate IMPL_PLAN.md with test generation and execution strategy
+- Generate TODO_LIST.md with both tasks
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.json` exists (test generation)
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-002.json` exists (test execution & fix)
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` created
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` created
+
+**Validation - IMPL-001.json (Test Generation)**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-001`
+- `meta.type: "test-gen"`
+- `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+- `context.requirements`: Generate tests based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- `flow_control.pre_analysis`: Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and test context
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach`: Test generation steps
+- `flow_control.target_files`: Test files to create from analysis section 5
+
+**Validation - IMPL-002.json (Test Execution & Fix)**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-002`
+- `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `meta.use_codex: true|false` (based on --use-codex flag)
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
+  - **Cycle pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if --use-codex) → retest
+  - **Tools configuration**: Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template, manual or Codex for fixes
+  - **Exit conditions**: Success (all pass) or failure (max iterations)
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase execution flow
+  - Phase 1: Initial test execution
+  - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes (based on flag)
+  - Phase 3: Final validation and certification
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed, phase 5 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Return Summary to User
+
+**Return to User**:
 ```
-├── Load completed implementation session
-├── Analyze IMPL_PLAN.md and completed tasks
-├── Scan .summaries/ for implementation deliverables
-├── Examine target_files from task definitions
-├── Identify implemented features and components
-├── Map code coverage requirements
-└── Generate test coverage matrix
+Independent test-fix workflow created successfully!
+
+Source Session: [sourceSessionId]
+Test Session: [testSessionId]
+
+Tasks Created:
+- IMPL-001: Test Generation (@code-developer)
+- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
+
+Test Framework: [detected framework]
+Test Files to Generate: [count]
+Max Fix Iterations: 5
+Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated] (based on --use-codex flag)
+
+Next Steps:
+1. Review test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+2. Execute workflow: /workflow:execute
+3. Monitor progress: /workflow:status
 ```
 
-### Test Pattern Recognition
-```
-Implementation Pattern → Test Pattern
-├── API endpoints → API testing + contract testing
-├── Database models → Data validation + migration testing
-├── UI components → Component testing + user workflow testing
-├── Business logic → Unit testing + integration testing
-├── Authentication → Security testing + access control testing
-├── Configuration → Environment testing + deployment testing
-└── Performance critical → Load testing + performance testing
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
+
+---
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+Track progress through 5 phases:
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]})
 ```
 
-## Test Workflow Structure
+Update status to `in_progress` when starting each phase, mark `completed` when done.
+
+## Data Flow
 
-### Generated Test Session Structure
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-test-[base-session]/
-├── TEST_PLAN.md                 # Comprehensive test planning document
-├── TODO_LIST.md                 # Test execution progress tracking
-├── .process/
-│   ├── TEST_ANALYSIS.md         # Test coverage analysis results
-│   └── COVERAGE_MATRIX.md       # Implementation-to-test mapping
-├── .task/
-│   ├── TEST-001.json           # Unit test tasks
-│   ├── TEST-002.json           # Integration test tasks
-│   ├── TEST-003.json           # E2E test tasks
-│   └── TEST-004.json           # Performance test tasks
-├── .summaries/                  # Test execution summaries
-└── .context/
-    ├── impl-context.md         # Implementation context reference
-    └── test-fixtures.md        # Test data and fixture planning
+/workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
+  ↓
+Phase 1: session-start → WFS-test-user-auth
+  ↓
+Phase 2: test-context-gather → test-context-package.json
+  ↓
+Phase 3: test-concept-enhanced → TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+  ↓
+Phase 4: test-task-generate → IMPL-001.json + IMPL-002.json
+  ↓
+Phase 5: Return summary
+  ↓
+/workflow:execute → IMPL-001 (@code-developer) → IMPL-002 (@test-fix-agent)
 ```
 
-## Test Task Types & Agent Assignment
+## Session Metadata
 
-### Task Categories
-1. **Unit Tests** (`TEST-U-*`)
-   - **Agent**: `code-review-test-agent`
-   - **Scope**: Individual function/method testing
-   - **Dependencies**: Implementation files
+Test session includes `workflow_type: "test_session"` and `source_session_id` for automatic context gathering.
 
-2. **Integration Tests** (`TEST-I-*`)
-   - **Agent**: `code-review-test-agent`
-   - **Scope**: Component interaction testing
-   - **Dependencies**: Unit tests completion
+## Task Output
 
-3. **End-to-End Tests** (`TEST-E-*`)
-   - **Agent**: `general-purpose`
-   - **Scope**: User workflow and system testing
-   - **Dependencies**: Integration tests completion
+Generates two tasks:
+- **IMPL-001** (@code-developer): Test generation from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- **IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent): Test execution with iterative fix cycle (max 5 iterations)
 
-4. **Performance Tests** (`TEST-P-*`)
-   - **Agent**: `code-developer`
-   - **Scope**: Load, stress, and performance validation
-   - **Dependencies**: E2E tests completion
+See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete task JSON schemas.
 
-5. **Security Tests** (`TEST-S-*`)
-   - **Agent**: `code-review-test-agent`
-   - **Scope**: Security validation and vulnerability testing
-   - **Dependencies**: Implementation completion
+## Error Handling
 
-6. **Documentation Tests** (`TEST-D-*`)
-   - **Agent**: `doc-generator`
-   - **Scope**: Documentation validation and example testing
-   - **Dependencies**: Feature tests completion
+| Phase | Error | Action |
+|-------|-------|--------|
+| 1 | Source session not found | Return error with source session ID |
+| 1 | No completed IMPL tasks | Return error, source incomplete |
+| 2 | Context gathering failed | Return error, check source artifacts |
+| 3 | Analysis failed | Return error, check context package |
+| 4 | Task generation failed | Retry once, then error with details |
 
-## Test Task JSON Schema
+## Output Files
 
-Each test task follows the 5-field workflow architecture with test-specific extensions:
+Created in `.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/`:
+- `workflow-session.json` - Session metadata
+- `.process/test-context-package.json` - Coverage analysis
+- `.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - Test requirements
+- `.task/IMPL-001.json` - Test generation task
+- `.task/IMPL-002.json` - Test execution & fix task
+- `IMPL_PLAN.md` - Test plan
+- `TODO_LIST.md` - Task checklist
 
-### Basic Test Task Structure
-```json
-{
-  "id": "TEST-U-001",
-  "title": "Unit tests for authentication service",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "unit-test",
-    "agent": "code-review-test-agent",
-    "test_framework": "jest",
-    "coverage_target": "90%",
-    "impl_reference": "IMPL-001"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": "Test all authentication service functions with edge cases",
-    "focus_paths": ["src/auth/", "tests/unit/auth/"],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "All auth service functions tested",
-      "Edge cases covered",
-      "90% code coverage achieved",
-      "Tests pass in CI/CD pipeline"
-    ],
-    "depends_on": [],
-    "impl_context": "IMPL-001-summary.md",
-    "test_data": "auth-test-fixtures.json"
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_impl_context",
-        "action": "Load implementation context and deliverables",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[base-session]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md)",
-        "output_to": "impl_context"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_test_coverage",
-        "action": "Analyze existing test coverage and gaps",
-        "command": "bash(find src/auth/ -name '*.js' -o -name '*.ts' | head -20)",
-        "output_to": "coverage_analysis"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": "test-driven",
-    "target_files": [
-      "tests/unit/auth/auth-service.test.js",
-      "tests/unit/auth/auth-utils.test.js",
-      "tests/fixtures/auth-test-data.json"
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
+## Agent Execution
 
-## Test Context Management
+**IMPL-001** (@code-developer):
+- Generates test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- Follows existing test patterns and conventions
 
-### Implementation Context Integration
-Test tasks automatically inherit context from corresponding implementation tasks:
+**IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent):
+1. Run test suite
+2. Iterative fix cycle (max 5):
+   - Gemini diagnosis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
+   - Manual fix application (default) OR Codex applies fixes if --use-codex flag (resume mechanism)
+   - Retest and check regressions
+3. Final validation and certification
 
-```json
-"context": {
-  "impl_reference": "IMPL-001",
-  "impl_summary": ".workflow/WFS-[base-session]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
-  "impl_files": ["src/auth/service.js", "src/auth/middleware.js"],
-  "test_requirements": "derived from implementation acceptance criteria",
-  "coverage_requirements": "90% line coverage, 80% branch coverage"
-}
-```
+See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for detailed specifications.
 
-### Flow Control for Test Execution
-```json
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [
-    {
-      "step": "load_impl_deliverables",
-      "action": "Load implementation files and analyze test requirements",
-      "command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze implementation for test requirements TASK: Review [impl_files] and identify test cases CONTEXT: @{[impl_files]} EXPECTED: Comprehensive test case list RULES: Focus on edge cases and integration points\""
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "setup_test_environment",
-      "action": "Prepare test environment and fixtures",
-      "command": "codex --full-auto exec \"Setup test environment for [test_framework] with fixtures for [feature_name]\" -s danger-full-access"
-    }
-  ]
-}
-```
+## Best Practices
 
-## Session Management & Integration
+1. Run after implementation complete (ensure source session has summaries)
+2. Commit implementation changes before test-gen
+3. Monitor execution with `/workflow:status`
+4. Review iteration logs in `.process/fix-iteration-*`
 
-### Test Session Creation Process
-1. **Base Session Discovery**: Identify implementation session to test
-2. **Test Session Creation**: Create `WFS-test-[base-session]` directory structure
-3. **Context Linking**: Establish references to implementation context
-4. **Active Marker**: Create `.active-test-[base-session]` marker for session management
+## Related Commands
 
-### Integration with Execute Command
-Test workflows integrate seamlessly with existing execute infrastructure:
-- Use same TodoWrite progress tracking
-- Follow same agent orchestration patterns
-- Support same flow control mechanisms
-- Maintain same session isolation and management
-
-## Usage Examples
-
-### Generate Tests for Completed Implementation
-```bash
-# After completing an implementation workflow
-/workflow:execute  # Complete implementation tasks
-
-# Generate comprehensive test workflow
-/workflow:test-gen  # Auto-detects active session
-
-# Execute test workflow
-/workflow:execute  # Runs test tasks
-```
-
-### Generate Tests for Specific Session
-```bash
-# Generate tests for specific implementation session
-/workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth-system
-
-# Check test workflow status
-/workflow:status --session=WFS-test-user-auth-system
-
-# Execute specific test category
-/task:execute TEST-U-001  # Run unit tests
-```
-
-### Multi-Phase Test Generation
-```bash
-# Generate and execute tests in phases
-/workflow:test-gen WFS-api-implementation
-/task:execute TEST-U-*     # Unit tests first
-/task:execute TEST-I-*     # Integration tests
-/task:execute TEST-E-*     # E2E tests last
-```
-
-## Error Handling & Recovery
-
-### Implementation Analysis Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| No completed implementations | No IMPL-* tasks found | Complete implementation tasks first |
-| Missing implementation context | Corrupted summaries | Regenerate summaries from task results |
-| Invalid implementation files | File references broken | Update file paths and re-analyze |
-
-### Test Generation Errors
-| Error | Cause | Recovery Strategy |
-|-------|-------|------------------|
-| Test framework not detected | No testing setup found | Prompt for test framework selection |
-| Insufficient implementation context | Missing implementation details | Request additional implementation documentation |
-| Test session collision | Test session already exists | Merge or create versioned test session |
-
-## Key Benefits
-
-### Comprehensive Coverage
-- **Implementation-driven**: Tests generated based on actual implementation patterns
-- **Multi-layered**: Unit, integration, E2E, and specialized testing
-- **Dependency-aware**: Test execution follows logical dependency chains
-- **Agent-optimized**: Specialized agents for different test types
-
-### Workflow Integration
-- **Seamless execution**: Uses existing workflow infrastructure
-- **Progress tracking**: Full TodoWrite integration for test progress
-- **Context preservation**: Maintains links to implementation context
-- **Session management**: Independent test sessions with proper isolation
-
-### Maintenance & Evolution
-- **Updateable**: Test workflows can evolve with implementation changes
-- **Traceable**: Clear mapping from implementation to test requirements
-- **Extensible**: Support for new test types and frameworks
-- **Documentable**: Comprehensive test documentation and coverage reports
-
-## Integration Points
-- **Planning**: Integrates with `/workflow:plan` for test planning
-- **Execution**: Uses `/workflow:execute` for test task execution
-- **Status**: Works with `/workflow:status` for test progress tracking
-- **Documentation**: Coordinates with `/workflow:docs` for test documentation
-- **Review**: Supports `/workflow:review` for test validation and coverage analysis
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (coverage analysis)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3 (Gemini test analysis)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4 (task generation)
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute workflow
+- `/workflow:status` - Check progress

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/concept-enhanced.md

@@ -0,0 +1,533 @@
+---
+name: concept-enhanced
+description: Enhanced intelligent analysis with parallel CLI execution and design blueprint generation
+usage: /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session <session_id> --context <context_package_path>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --context path/to/context-package.json"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session WFS-auth --context .workflow/WFS-auth/.process/context-package.json
+  - /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session WFS-payment --context .workflow/WFS-payment/.process/context-package.json
+---
+
+# Enhanced Analysis Command (/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced)
+
+## Overview
+Advanced solution design and feasibility analysis engine with parallel CLI execution that processes standardized context packages and produces comprehensive technical analysis focused on solution improvements, key design decisions, and critical insights.
+
+**Analysis Focus**: Produces ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with solution design, architectural rationale, feasibility assessment, and optimization strategies. Does NOT generate task breakdowns or implementation plans.
+
+**Independent Usage**: This command can be called directly by users or as part of the `/workflow:plan` command. It accepts context packages and provides solution-focused technical analysis.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Solution-Focused**: Emphasize design decisions, architectural rationale, and critical insights
+- **Context-Driven**: Precise analysis based on comprehensive context packages
+- **Intelligent Tool Selection**: Choose optimal tools based on task complexity (Gemini for design, Codex for validation)
+- **Parallel Execution**: Execute multiple CLI tools simultaneously for efficiency
+- **No Task Planning**: Exclude implementation steps, task breakdowns, and project planning
+- **Single Output**: Generate only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with technical analysis
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- **Context Package Parsing**: Read and validate context-package.json
+- **Parallel CLI Orchestration**: Execute Gemini (solution design) and optionally Codex (feasibility validation)
+- **Solution Design Analysis**: Evaluate architecture, identify key design decisions with rationale
+- **Feasibility Assessment**: Analyze technical complexity, risks, and implementation readiness
+- **Optimization Recommendations**: Propose performance, security, and code quality improvements
+- **Perspective Synthesis**: Integrate Gemini and Codex insights into unified solution assessment
+- **Technical Analysis Report**: Generate ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focused on design decisions and critical insights (NO task planning)
+
+## Analysis Strategy Selection
+
+### Tool Selection by Task Complexity
+
+**Simple Tasks (≤3 modules)**:
+- **Primary Tool**: Gemini (rapid understanding and pattern recognition)
+- **Support Tool**: Code-index (structural analysis)
+- **Execution Mode**: Single-round analysis, focus on existing patterns
+
+**Medium Tasks (4-6 modules)**:
+- **Primary Tool**: Gemini (comprehensive single-round analysis and architecture design)
+- **Support Tools**: Code-index + Exa (external best practices)
+- **Execution Mode**: Single comprehensive analysis covering understanding + architecture design
+
+**Complex Tasks (>6 modules)**:
+- **Primary Tools**: Gemini (single comprehensive analysis) + Codex (implementation validation)
+- **Analysis Strategy**: Gemini handles understanding + architecture in one round, Codex validates implementation
+- **Execution Mode**: Parallel execution - Gemini comprehensive analysis + Codex validation
+
+### Tool Preferences by Tech Stack
+
+```json
+{
+  "frontend": {
+    "primary": "gemini",
+    "secondary": "codex",
+    "focus": ["component_design", "state_management", "ui_patterns"]
+  },
+  "backend": {
+    "primary": "codex",
+    "secondary": "gemini",
+    "focus": ["api_design", "data_flow", "security", "performance"]
+  },
+  "fullstack": {
+    "primary": "gemini",
+    "secondary": "codex",
+    "focus": ["system_architecture", "integration", "data_consistency"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Validation & Preparation
+1. **Session Validation**
+   - Verify session directory exists: `.workflow/{session_id}/`
+   - Load session metadata from `workflow-session.json`
+   - Validate session state and task context
+
+2. **Context Package Validation**
+   - Verify context package exists at specified path
+   - Validate JSON format and structure
+   - Assess context package size and complexity
+
+3. **Task Analysis & Classification**
+   - Parse task description and extract keywords
+   - Identify technical domain and complexity level
+   - Determine required analysis depth and scope
+   - Load existing session context and task summaries
+
+4. **Tool Selection Strategy**
+   - **Simple/Medium Tasks**: Single Gemini comprehensive analysis
+   - **Complex Tasks**: Gemini comprehensive + Codex validation
+   - Load appropriate prompt templates and configurations
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Preparation
+1. **Workspace Setup**
+   - Create analysis output directory: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/`
+   - Initialize log files and monitoring structures
+   - Set process limits and resource management
+
+2. **Context Optimization**
+   - Filter high-priority assets from context package
+   - Organize project structure and dependencies
+   - Prepare template references and rule configurations
+
+3. **Execution Environment**
+   - Configure CLI tools with write permissions
+   - Set timeout parameters and monitoring intervals
+   - Prepare error handling and recovery mechanisms
+
+### Phase 3: Parallel Analysis Execution
+1. **Gemini Solution Design & Architecture Analysis**
+   - **Tool Configuration**:
+     ```bash
+     ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     PURPOSE: Analyze and design optimal solution for {task_description}
+     TASK: Evaluate current architecture, propose solution design, and identify key design decisions
+     CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
+
+     **MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json to understand:
+     - Task requirements from metadata.task_description
+     - Relevant source files from assets[] array
+     - Tech stack from tech_stack section
+     - Project structure from statistics section
+
+     **ANALYSIS PRIORITY - Use ALL source documents from context-package assets[]**:
+     1. PRIMARY SOURCES (Highest Priority): Individual role analysis.md files (system-architect, ui-designer, product-manager, etc.)
+        - These contain complete technical details, design rationale, ADRs, and decision context
+        - Extract: Technical specs, API schemas, design tokens, caching configs, performance metrics
+     2. SYNTHESIS REFERENCE (Medium Priority): synthesis-specification.md
+        - Use for integrated requirements and cross-role alignment
+        - Validate decisions and identify integration points
+     3. TOPIC FRAMEWORK (Low Priority): topic-framework.md for discussion context
+
+     EXPECTED:
+     1. CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS: Existing patterns, code structure, integration points, technical debt
+     2. SOLUTION DESIGN: Core architecture principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale
+     3. CRITICAL INSIGHTS: What works well, identified gaps, technical risks, architectural tradeoffs
+     4. OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES: Performance improvements, security enhancements, code quality recommendations
+     5. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Complexity analysis, compatibility evaluation, implementation readiness
+     6. **OUTPUT FILE**: Write complete analysis to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
+
+     RULES:
+     - Focus on SOLUTION IMPROVEMENTS and KEY DESIGN DECISIONS, NOT task planning
+     - Provide architectural rationale, evaluate alternatives, assess tradeoffs
+     - **CRITICAL**: Identify code targets - existing files as "file:function:lines", new files as "file"
+     - For modifications: specify exact files/functions/line ranges
+     - For new files: specify file path only (no function or lines)
+     - Do NOT create task lists, implementation steps, or code examples
+     - Do NOT generate any code snippets or implementation details
+     - **MUST write output to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md**
+     - Output ONLY architectural analysis and design recommendations
+     " --approval-mode yolo
+     ```
+   - **Output Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
+
+2. **Codex Technical Feasibility Validation** (Complex Tasks Only)
+   - **Tool Configuration**:
+     ```bash
+     codex --full-auto exec "
+     PURPOSE: Validate technical feasibility and identify implementation risks for {task_description}
+     TASK: Assess implementation complexity, validate technology choices, evaluate performance and security implications
+     CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
+
+     **MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze:
+     - .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json for task context
+     - .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md for proposed solution design
+     - Relevant source files listed in context-package.json assets[]
+
+     EXPECTED:
+     1. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Technical complexity rating, resource requirements, technology compatibility
+     2. RISK ANALYSIS: Implementation risks, integration challenges, performance concerns, security vulnerabilities
+     3. TECHNICAL VALIDATION: Development approach validation, quality standards assessment, maintenance implications
+     4. CRITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Must-have requirements, optimization opportunities, security controls
+     5. **OUTPUT FILE**: Write validation results to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
+
+     RULES:
+     - Focus on TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY and RISK ASSESSMENT, NOT implementation planning
+     - Validate architectural decisions, identify potential issues, recommend optimizations
+     - **CRITICAL**: Verify code targets - existing files "file:function:lines", new files "file"
+     - Confirm exact locations for modifications, identify additional new files if needed
+     - Do NOT create task breakdowns, step-by-step guides, or code examples
+     - Do NOT generate any code snippets or implementation details
+     - **MUST write output to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md**
+     - Output ONLY feasibility analysis and risk assessment
+     " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+     ```
+   - **Output Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
+
+3. **Parallel Execution Management**
+   - Launch both tools simultaneously for complex tasks
+   - Monitor execution progress with timeout controls
+   - Handle process completion and error scenarios
+   - Maintain execution logs for debugging and recovery
+
+### Phase 4: Results Collection & Synthesis
+1. **Output Validation & Collection**
+   - **Gemini Results**: Validate `gemini-solution-design.md` contains complete solution analysis
+   - **Codex Results**: For complex tasks, validate `codex-feasibility-validation.md` with technical assessment
+   - **Fallback Processing**: Use execution logs if primary outputs are incomplete
+   - **Status Classification**: Mark each tool as completed, partial, failed, or skipped
+
+2. **Quality Assessment**
+   - **Design Quality**: Verify architectural decisions have clear rationale and alternatives analysis
+   - **Insight Depth**: Assess quality of critical insights and risk identification
+   - **Feasibility Rigor**: Validate completeness of technical feasibility assessment
+   - **Optimization Value**: Check actionability of optimization recommendations
+
+3. **Analysis Synthesis Strategy**
+   - **Simple/Medium Tasks**: Direct integration of Gemini solution design
+   - **Complex Tasks**: Synthesis of Gemini design with Codex feasibility validation
+   - **Conflict Resolution**: Identify architectural disagreements and provide balanced resolution
+   - **Confidence Scoring**: Assess overall solution confidence based on multi-tool consensus
+
+### Phase 5: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Generation
+1. **Structured Report Assembly**
+   - **Executive Summary**: Analysis focus, overall assessment, recommendation status
+   - **Current State Analysis**: Architecture overview, compatibility, critical findings
+   - **Proposed Solution Design**: Core principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale
+   - **Implementation Strategy**: Development approach, feasibility assessment, risk mitigation
+   - **Solution Optimization**: Performance, security, code quality recommendations
+   - **Critical Success Factors**: Technical requirements, quality metrics, success validation
+   - **Confidence & Recommendations**: Assessment scores, final recommendation with rationale
+
+2. **Report Generation Guidelines**
+   - **Focus**: Solution improvements, key design decisions, critical insights
+   - **Exclude**: Task breakdowns, implementation steps, project planning
+   - **Emphasize**: Architectural rationale, tradeoff analysis, risk assessment
+   - **Structure**: Clear sections with decision justification and feasibility scoring
+
+3. **Final Output**
+   - **Primary Output**: `ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - comprehensive solution design and technical analysis
+   - **Single File Policy**: Only generate ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md, no supplementary files
+   - **Report Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+   - **Content Focus**: Technical insights, design decisions, optimization strategies
+
+## Analysis Results Format
+
+Generated ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focuses on **solution improvements, key design decisions, and critical insights** (NOT task planning):
+
+```markdown
+# Technical Analysis & Solution Design
+
+## Executive Summary
+- **Analysis Focus**: {core_problem_or_improvement_area}
+- **Analysis Timestamp**: {timestamp}
+- **Tools Used**: {analysis_tools}
+- **Overall Assessment**: {feasibility_score}/5 - {recommendation_status}
+
+---
+
+## 1. Current State Analysis
+
+### Architecture Overview
+- **Existing Patterns**: {key_architectural_patterns}
+- **Code Structure**: {current_codebase_organization}
+- **Integration Points**: {system_integration_touchpoints}
+- **Technical Debt Areas**: {identified_debt_with_impact}
+
+### Compatibility & Dependencies
+- **Framework Alignment**: {framework_compatibility_assessment}
+- **Dependency Analysis**: {critical_dependencies_and_risks}
+- **Migration Considerations**: {backward_compatibility_concerns}
+
+### Critical Findings
+- **Strengths**: {what_works_well}
+- **Gaps**: {missing_capabilities_or_issues}
+- **Risks**: {identified_technical_and_business_risks}
+
+---
+
+## 2. Proposed Solution Design
+
+### Core Architecture Principles
+- **Design Philosophy**: {key_design_principles}
+- **Architectural Approach**: {chosen_architectural_pattern_with_rationale}
+- **Scalability Strategy**: {how_solution_scales}
+
+### System Design
+- **Component Architecture**: {high_level_component_design}
+- **Data Flow**: {data_flow_patterns_and_state_management}
+- **API Design**: {interface_contracts_and_specifications}
+- **Integration Strategy**: {how_components_integrate}
+
+### Key Design Decisions
+1. **Decision**: {critical_design_choice}
+   - **Rationale**: {why_this_approach}
+   - **Alternatives Considered**: {other_options_and_tradeoffs}
+   - **Impact**: {implications_on_architecture}
+
+2. **Decision**: {another_critical_choice}
+   - **Rationale**: {reasoning}
+   - **Alternatives Considered**: {tradeoffs}
+   - **Impact**: {consequences}
+
+### Technical Specifications
+- **Technology Stack**: {chosen_technologies_with_justification}
+- **Code Organization**: {module_structure_and_patterns}
+- **Testing Strategy**: {testing_approach_and_coverage}
+- **Performance Targets**: {performance_requirements_and_benchmarks}
+
+---
+
+## 3. Implementation Strategy
+
+### Development Approach
+- **Core Implementation Pattern**: {primary_implementation_strategy}
+- **Module Dependencies**: {dependency_graph_and_order}
+- **Quality Assurance**: {qa_approach_and_validation}
+
+### Code Modification Targets
+**Purpose**: Specific code locations for modification AND new files to create
+
+**Format**:
+- Existing files: `file:function:lines` (with line numbers)
+- New files: `file` (no function or lines)
+
+**Identified Targets**:
+1. **Target**: `src/auth/AuthService.ts:login:45-52`
+   - **Type**: Modify existing
+   - **Modification**: Enhance error handling
+   - **Rationale**: Current logic lacks validation for edge cases
+
+2. **Target**: `src/auth/PasswordReset.ts`
+   - **Type**: Create new file
+   - **Purpose**: Password reset functionality
+   - **Rationale**: New feature requirement
+
+3. **Target**: `src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken:30-45`
+   - **Type**: Modify existing
+   - **Modification**: Add token expiry check
+   - **Rationale**: Security requirement for JWT validation
+
+4. **Target**: `tests/auth/PasswordReset.test.ts`
+   - **Type**: Create new file
+   - **Purpose**: Test coverage for password reset
+   - **Rationale**: Test requirement for new feature
+
+**Note**:
+- For new files, only specify the file path (no function or lines)
+- For existing files without line numbers, use `file:function:*` format
+- Task generation will refine these during the `analyze_task_patterns` step
+
+### Feasibility Assessment
+- **Technical Complexity**: {complexity_rating_and_analysis}
+- **Performance Impact**: {expected_performance_characteristics}
+- **Resource Requirements**: {development_resources_needed}
+- **Maintenance Burden**: {ongoing_maintenance_considerations}
+
+### Risk Mitigation
+- **Technical Risks**: {implementation_risks_and_mitigation}
+- **Integration Risks**: {compatibility_challenges_and_solutions}
+- **Performance Risks**: {performance_concerns_and_strategies}
+- **Security Risks**: {security_vulnerabilities_and_controls}
+
+---
+
+## 4. Solution Optimization
+
+### Performance Optimization
+- **Optimization Strategies**: {key_performance_improvements}
+- **Caching Strategy**: {caching_approach_and_invalidation}
+- **Resource Management**: {resource_utilization_optimization}
+- **Bottleneck Mitigation**: {identified_bottlenecks_and_solutions}
+
+### Security Enhancements
+- **Security Model**: {authentication_authorization_approach}
+- **Data Protection**: {data_security_and_encryption}
+- **Vulnerability Mitigation**: {known_vulnerabilities_and_controls}
+- **Compliance**: {regulatory_and_compliance_considerations}
+
+### Code Quality
+- **Code Standards**: {coding_conventions_and_patterns}
+- **Testing Coverage**: {test_strategy_and_coverage_goals}
+- **Documentation**: {documentation_requirements}
+- **Maintainability**: {maintainability_practices}
+
+---
+
+## 5. Critical Success Factors
+
+### Technical Requirements
+- **Must Have**: {essential_technical_capabilities}
+- **Should Have**: {important_but_not_critical_features}
+- **Nice to Have**: {optional_enhancements}
+
+### Quality Metrics
+- **Performance Benchmarks**: {measurable_performance_targets}
+- **Code Quality Standards**: {quality_metrics_and_thresholds}
+- **Test Coverage Goals**: {testing_coverage_requirements}
+- **Security Standards**: {security_compliance_requirements}
+
+### Success Validation
+- **Acceptance Criteria**: {how_to_validate_success}
+- **Testing Strategy**: {validation_testing_approach}
+- **Monitoring Plan**: {production_monitoring_strategy}
+- **Rollback Plan**: {failure_recovery_strategy}
+
+---
+
+## 6. Analysis Confidence & Recommendations
+
+### Assessment Scores
+- **Conceptual Integrity**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
+- **Architectural Soundness**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
+- **Technical Feasibility**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
+- **Implementation Readiness**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
+- **Overall Confidence**: {overall_score}/5
+
+### Final Recommendation
+**Status**: {PROCEED|PROCEED_WITH_MODIFICATIONS|RECONSIDER|REJECT}
+
+**Rationale**: {clear_explanation_of_recommendation}
+
+**Critical Prerequisites**: {what_must_be_resolved_before_proceeding}
+
+---
+
+## 7. Reference Information
+
+### Tool Analysis Summary
+- **Gemini Insights**: {key_architectural_and_pattern_insights}
+- **Codex Validation**: {technical_feasibility_and_implementation_notes}
+- **Consensus Points**: {agreements_between_tools}
+- **Conflicting Views**: {disagreements_and_resolution}
+
+### Context & Resources
+- **Analysis Context**: {context_package_reference}
+- **Documentation References**: {relevant_documentation}
+- **Related Patterns**: {similar_implementations_in_codebase}
+- **External Resources**: {external_references_and_best_practices}
+```
+
+## Error Handling & Fallbacks
+
+### Error Handling & Recovery Strategies
+
+1. **Pre-execution Validation**
+   - **Session Verification**: Ensure session directory and metadata exist
+   - **Context Package Validation**: Verify JSON format and content structure
+   - **Tool Availability**: Confirm CLI tools are accessible and configured
+   - **Prerequisite Checks**: Validate all required dependencies and permissions
+
+2. **Execution Monitoring & Timeout Management**
+   - **Progress Monitoring**: Track analysis execution with regular status checks
+   - **Timeout Controls**: 30-minute execution limit with graceful termination
+   - **Process Management**: Handle parallel tool execution and resource limits
+   - **Status Tracking**: Maintain real-time execution state and completion status
+
+3. **Partial Results Recovery**
+   - **Fallback Strategy**: Generate analysis results even with incomplete outputs
+   - **Log Integration**: Use execution logs when primary outputs are unavailable
+   - **Recovery Mode**: Create partial analysis reports with available data
+   - **Guidance Generation**: Provide next steps and retry recommendations
+
+4. **Resource Management**
+   - **Disk Space Monitoring**: Check available storage and cleanup temporary files
+   - **Process Limits**: Set CPU and memory constraints for analysis execution
+   - **Performance Optimization**: Manage resource utilization and system load
+   - **Cleanup Procedures**: Remove outdated logs and temporary files
+
+5. **Comprehensive Error Recovery**
+   - **Error Detection**: Automatic error identification and classification
+   - **Recovery Workflows**: Structured approach to handling different failure modes
+   - **Status Reporting**: Clear communication of issues and resolution attempts
+   - **Graceful Degradation**: Provide useful outputs even with partial failures
+
+## Performance Optimization
+
+### Analysis Optimization Strategies
+- **Parallel Analysis**: Execute multiple tools in parallel to reduce total time
+- **Context Sharding**: Analyze large projects by module shards
+- **Caching Mechanism**: Reuse analysis results for similar contexts
+- **Incremental Analysis**: Perform incremental analysis based on changes
+
+### Resource Management
+```bash
+# Set analysis timeout
+timeout 600s analysis_command || {
+  echo "⚠️ Analysis timeout, generating partial results"
+  # Generate partial results
+}
+
+# Memory usage monitoring
+memory_usage=$(ps -o pid,vsz,rss,comm -p $$)
+if [ "$memory_usage" -gt "$memory_limit" ]; then
+  echo "⚠️ High memory usage detected, optimizing..."
+fi
+```
+
+## Integration Points
+
+### Input Interface
+- **Required**: `--session` parameter specifying session ID (e.g., WFS-auth)
+- **Required**: `--context` parameter specifying context package path
+- **Optional**: `--depth` specify analysis depth (quick|full|deep)
+- **Optional**: `--focus` specify analysis focus areas
+
+### Output Interface
+- **Primary**: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md - solution design and technical analysis
+- **Location**: .workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- **Single Output Policy**: Only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md is generated
+- **No Supplementary Files**: No additional JSON, roadmap, or template files
+
+## Quality Assurance
+
+### Analysis Quality Checks
+- **Completeness Check**: Ensure all required analysis sections are completed
+- **Consistency Check**: Verify consistency of multi-tool analysis results
+- **Feasibility Validation**: Ensure recommended implementation plans are feasible
+
+### Success Criteria
+- ✅ **Solution-Focused Analysis**: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md emphasizes solution improvements, design decisions, and critical insights
+- ✅ **Single Output File**: Only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated, no supplementary files
+- ✅ **Design Decision Depth**: Clear rationale for architectural choices with alternatives and tradeoffs
+- ✅ **Feasibility Assessment**: Technical complexity, risk analysis, and implementation readiness evaluation
+- ✅ **Optimization Strategies**: Performance, security, and code quality recommendations
+- ✅ **Parallel Execution**: Efficient concurrent tool execution (Gemini + Codex for complex tasks)
+- ✅ **Robust Error Handling**: Comprehensive validation, timeout management, and partial result recovery
+- ✅ **Confidence Scoring**: Multi-dimensional assessment with clear recommendation status
+- ✅ **No Task Planning**: Exclude task breakdowns, implementation steps, and project planning details
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/context:gather` - Generate context packages required by this command
+- `/workflow:plan` - Call this command for analysis
+- `/task:create` - Create specific tasks based on analysis results

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/context-gather.md

@@ -0,0 +1,301 @@
+---
+name: gather
+description: Intelligently collect project context based on task description and package into standardized JSON
+usage: /workflow:tools:context-gather --session <session_id> "<task_description>"
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id \"task description\""
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-user-auth "Implement user authentication system"
+  - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-payment "Refactor payment module API"
+  - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-bugfix "Fix login validation error"
+---
+
+# Context Gather Command (/workflow:tools:context-gather)
+
+## Overview
+Intelligent context collector that gathers relevant information from project codebase, documentation, and dependencies based on task descriptions, generating standardized context packages.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Intelligent Collection**: Auto-identify relevant resources based on keyword analysis
+- **Comprehensive Coverage**: Collect code, documentation, configurations, and dependencies
+- **Standardized Output**: Generate unified format context-package.json
+- **Efficient Execution**: Optimize collection strategies to avoid irrelevant information
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- **Keyword Extraction**: Extract core keywords from task descriptions
+- **Smart Documentation Loading**: Load relevant project documentation based on keywords
+- **Code Structure Analysis**: Analyze project structure to locate relevant code files
+- **Dependency Discovery**: Identify tech stack and dependency relationships
+- **MCP Tools Integration**: Leverage code-index tools for enhanced collection
+- **Context Packaging**: Generate standardized JSON context packages
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Phase 1: Task Analysis
+1. **Keyword Extraction**
+   - Parse task description to extract core keywords
+   - Identify technical domain (auth, API, frontend, backend, etc.)
+   - Determine complexity level (simple, medium, complex)
+
+2. **Scope Determination**
+   - Define collection scope based on keywords
+   - Identify potentially involved modules and components
+   - Set file type filters
+
+### Phase 2: Project Structure Exploration
+1. **Architecture Analysis**
+   - Use `~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh` for comprehensive project structure
+   - Analyze project layout and module organization
+   - Identify key directories and components
+
+2. **Code File Location**
+   - Use MCP tools for precise search: `mcp__code-index__find_files()` and `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()`
+   - Search for relevant source code files based on keywords
+   - Locate implementation files, interfaces, and modules
+
+3. **Documentation Collection**
+   - Load CLAUDE.md and README.md
+   - Load relevant documentation from .workflow/docs/ based on keywords
+   - Collect configuration files (package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
+
+### Phase 3: Intelligent Filtering & Association
+1. **Relevance Scoring**
+   - Score based on keyword match degree
+   - Score based on file path relevance
+   - Score based on code content relevance
+
+2. **Dependency Analysis**
+   - Analyze import/require statements
+   - Identify inter-module dependencies
+   - Determine core and optional dependencies
+
+### Phase 4: Context Packaging
+1. **Standardized Output**
+   - Generate context-package.json
+   - Organize resources by type and importance
+   - Add relevance descriptions and usage recommendations
+
+## Context Package Format
+
+Generated context package format:
+
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "task_description": "Implement user authentication system",
+    "timestamp": "2025-09-29T10:30:00Z",
+    "keywords": ["user", "authentication", "JWT", "login"],
+    "complexity": "medium",
+    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "node.js", "express"],
+    "session_id": "WFS-user-auth"
+  },
+  "assets": [
+    {
+      "type": "documentation",
+      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+      "relevance": "Project development standards and conventions",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "documentation",
+      "path": ".workflow/docs/architecture/security.md",
+      "relevance": "Security architecture design guidance",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "source_code",
+      "path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
+      "relevance": "Existing authentication service implementation",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "source_code",
+      "path": "src/models/User.ts",
+      "relevance": "User data model definition",
+      "priority": "medium"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "config",
+      "path": "package.json",
+      "relevance": "Project dependencies and tech stack",
+      "priority": "medium"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "test",
+      "path": "tests/auth/*.test.ts",
+      "relevance": "Authentication related test cases",
+      "priority": "medium"
+    }
+  ],
+  "tech_stack": {
+    "frameworks": ["express", "typescript"],
+    "libraries": ["jsonwebtoken", "bcrypt"],
+    "testing": ["jest", "supertest"]
+  },
+  "statistics": {
+    "total_files": 15,
+    "source_files": 8,
+    "docs_files": 4,
+    "config_files": 2,
+    "test_files": 1
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## MCP Tools Integration
+
+### Code Index Integration
+```bash
+# Set project path
+mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path="{current_project_path}")
+
+# Refresh index to ensure latest
+mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
+
+# Search relevant files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*{keyword}*")
+
+# Search code content
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="{keyword_patterns}",
+  file_pattern="*.{ts,js,py,go,md}",
+  context_lines=3
+)
+```
+
+
+## Session ID Integration
+
+### Session ID Usage
+- **Required Parameter**: `--session WFS-session-id`
+- **Session Context Loading**: Load existing session state and task summaries
+- **Session Continuity**: Maintain context across pipeline phases
+
+### Session State Management
+```bash
+# Validate session exists
+if [ ! -d ".workflow/${session_id}" ]; then
+  echo "❌ Session ${session_id} not found"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+# Load session metadata
+session_metadata=".workflow/${session_id}/workflow-session.json"
+```
+
+## Output Location
+
+Context package output location:
+```
+.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Common Error Handling
+1. **No Active Session**: Create temporary session directory
+2. **MCP Tools Unavailable**: Fallback to traditional bash commands
+3. **Permission Errors**: Prompt user to check file permissions
+4. **Large Project Optimization**: Limit file count, prioritize high-relevance files
+
+### Graceful Degradation Strategy
+```bash
+# Fallback when MCP unavailable
+if ! command -v mcp__code-index__find_files; then
+  # Use find command for file discovery
+  find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*"
+
+  # Alternative pattern matching
+  find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" \) -exec grep -l "{keyword}" {} \;
+fi
+
+# Use ripgrep instead of MCP search
+rg "{keywords}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source --max-count 30
+
+# Content-based search with context
+rg -A 3 -B 3 "{keywords}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source
+
+# Quick relevance check
+grep -r --include="*.{ts,js,py,go}" -l "{keywords}" . | head -15
+
+# Test files discovery
+find . -name "*test*" -o -name "*spec*" | grep -E "\.(ts|js|py|go)$" | head -10
+
+# Import/dependency analysis
+rg "^(import|from|require|#include)" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source | head -20
+```
+
+## Performance Optimization
+
+### Large Project Optimization Strategy
+- **File Count Limit**: Maximum 50 files per type
+- **Size Filtering**: Skip oversized files (>10MB)
+- **Depth Limit**: Maximum search depth of 3 levels
+- **Caching Strategy**: Cache project structure analysis results
+
+### Parallel Processing
+- Documentation collection and code search in parallel
+- MCP tool calls and traditional commands in parallel
+- Reduce I/O wait time
+
+## Essential Bash Commands (Max 10)
+
+### 1. Project Structure Analysis
+```bash
+~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
+```
+
+### 2. File Discovery by Keywords
+```bash
+find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*"
+```
+
+### 3. Content Search in Code Files
+```bash
+rg "{keyword}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source --max-count 20
+```
+
+### 4. Configuration Files Discovery
+```bash
+find . -maxdepth 3 \( -name "*.json" -o -name "package.json" -o -name "requirements.txt" -o -name "Cargo.toml" \) -not -path "*/node_modules/*"
+```
+
+### 5. Documentation Files Collection
+```bash
+find . -name "*.md" -o -name "README*" -o -name "CLAUDE.md" | grep -v node_modules | head -10
+```
+
+### 6. Test Files Location
+```bash
+find . \( -name "*test*" -o -name "*spec*" \) -type f | grep -E "\.(js|ts|py|go)$" | head -10
+```
+
+### 7. Function/Class Definitions Search
+```bash
+rg "^(function|def|func|class|interface)" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source -n --max-count 15
+```
+
+### 8. Import/Dependency Analysis
+```bash
+rg "^(import|from|require|#include)" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source | head -15
+```
+
+### 9. Workflow Session Information
+```bash
+find .workflow/ -name "*.json" -path "*/${session_id}/*" -o -name "workflow-session.json" | head -5
+```
+
+### 10. Context-Aware Content Search
+```bash
+rg -A 2 -B 2 "{keywords}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source --max-count 10
+```
+
+## Success Criteria
+- Generate valid context-package.json file
+- Contains sufficient relevant information for subsequent analysis
+- Execution time controlled within 30 seconds
+- File relevance accuracy rate >80%
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Consumes output of this command for analysis
+- `/workflow:plan` - Calls this command to gather context
+- `/workflow:status` - Can display context collection status

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,590 @@
+---
+name: docs
+description: Documentation planning and orchestration - creates structured documentation tasks for execution
+usage: /workflow:docs <type> [options]
+argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all" [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
+examples:
+  - /workflow:docs all                          # Complete documentation (gemini default)
+  - /workflow:docs all --tool qwen              # Use Qwen for architecture focus
+  - /workflow:docs architecture --scope src/modules
+  - /workflow:docs api --tool gemini --scope api/
+---
+
+# Workflow Documentation Command
+
+## Purpose
+
+**`/workflow:docs` is a lightweight planner/orchestrator** - it analyzes project structure using metadata tools, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. It does **NOT** generate any documentation content itself.
+
+**Key Principle**: Lightweight Planning + Targeted Execution
+- **docs.md** → Collect metadata (paths, structure), generate task JSONs with path references
+- **doc-generator.md** → Execute targeted analysis on focus_paths, generate content
+
+**Optimization Philosophy**:
+- **Planning phase**: Minimal context - only metadata (module paths, file lists via `get_modules_by_depth.sh` and Code Index MCP)
+- **Task JSON**: Store path references, not content
+- **Execution phase**: Targeted deep analysis within focus_paths scope
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:docs <type> [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
+```
+
+### Parameters
+
+- **type**: `architecture` | `api` | `all` (required)
+  - `architecture`: System design, module interactions, patterns
+  - `api`: Endpoint documentation, API specifications
+  - `all`: Complete documentation suite
+
+- **--tool**: `gemini` | `qwen` | `codex` (optional, default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
+
+- **--scope**: Directory path filter (optional)
+
+## Planning Workflow
+
+### Complete Execution Flow
+
+```
+/workflow:docs [type] [--tool] [--scope]
+    ↓
+Phase 1: Init Session → Create session dir & active marker
+    ↓
+Phase 2: Module Analysis → Run get_modules_by_depth.sh
+    ↓
+Phase 3: Quick Assess → Check existing docs
+    ↓
+Phase 4: Decompose → Create task list & TodoWrite
+    ↓
+Phase 5: Generate Tasks → Build IMPL-*.json & plans
+    ↓
+✅ Planning Complete → Show TodoWrite status
+```
+
+### Phase Details
+
+#### Phase 1: Session Initialization
+```bash
+# Parse arguments and create session structure
+doc_type="all"  # architecture|api|all
+tool="gemini"   # gemini|qwen|codex (default: gemini)
+scope=""        # optional path filter
+
+timestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+session_dir=".workflow/WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
+mkdir -p "${session_dir}"/{.task,.process,.summaries}
+touch ".workflow/.active-WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
+```
+
+#### Phase 2: Lightweight Metadata Collection (MANDATORY)
+```bash
+# Step 1: Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for module hierarchy (metadata only)
+module_data=$(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+# Format: depth:N|path:<PATH>|files:N|size:N|has_claude:yes/no
+
+# Step 2: Use Code Index MCP for file discovery (optional, for better precision)
+# Example: mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="src/**/")
+# This finds directories without loading content
+
+# IMPORTANT: Do NOT read file contents in planning phase
+# Only collect: paths, file counts, module structure
+```
+
+#### Phase 3: Quick Documentation Assessment
+```bash
+# Lightweight check - no heavy analysis
+existing_docs=$(find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.md" -not -path "./.workflow/*" | wc -l)
+
+if [[ $existing_docs -gt 5 ]]; then
+    find . -maxdepth 3 -name "*.md" > "${session_dir}/.process/existing-docs.txt"
+fi
+
+# Record strategy
+cat > "${session_dir}/.process/strategy.md" <<EOF
+**Type**: ${doc_type}
+**Tool**: ${tool}
+**Scope**: ${scope:-"Full project"}
+EOF
+```
+
+#### Phase 4: Task Decomposition & TodoWrite Setup
+
+**Decomposition Strategy**:
+1. **Always create**: System Overview task (IMPL-001)
+2. **If architecture/all**: Architecture Documentation task
+3. **If api/all**: Unified API Documentation task
+4. **For each module**: Module Documentation task (grouped)
+
+**Grouping Rules**:
+- Max 3 modules per task
+- Max 30 files per task
+- Group by dependency depth and functional similarity
+
+**TodoWrite Setup**:
+```
+✅ Session initialization (completed)
+⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-003: Module 'api' (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-004: Architecture Documentation (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-005: API Documentation (pending)
+```
+
+#### Phase 5: Task JSON Generation
+
+Each task follows the 5-field schema with detailed flow_control.
+
+**Command Generation Logic**:
+```bash
+# Build tool-specific command at planning time
+if [[ "$tool" == "codex" ]]; then
+    cmd="codex -C ${dir} --full-auto exec \"...\""
+else
+    cmd="bash(cd ${dir} && ~/.claude/scripts/${tool}-wrapper -p \"...\")"
+fi
+```
+
+## Task Templates
+
+### 1. System Overview (IMPL-001)
+**Purpose**: Project-level documentation
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/README.md`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Generate Project Overview Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "project-overview"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document project purpose, architecture, and getting started guide",
+      "Create navigation structure for all documentation",
+      "Use Project-Level Documentation Template"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["."],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete .workflow/docs/README.md following template",
+      "All template sections populated with accurate information",
+      "Navigation links to module and API documentation"
+    ],
+    "scope": "Project root and overall structure"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "discover_project_structure",
+        "action": "Get project module hierarchy metadata",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
+        "output_to": "system_structure",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Lightweight metadata only - no file content"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_tech_stack",
+        "action": "Analyze technology stack from key config files",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project technology stack\\nTASK: Extract tech stack from key config files\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{package.json,pom.xml,build.gradle,requirements.txt,go.mod,Cargo.toml,CLAUDE.md}\\nEXPECTED: Technology list and architecture style\\nRULES: Be concise, focus on stack only\")",
+        "output_to": "tech_stack_analysis",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional",
+        "note": "Only analyze config files - small, controlled context"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Use system_structure and tech_stack_analysis to populate Project Overview Template",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt",
+        "Fill sections using [system_structure] and [tech_stack_analysis]",
+        "Generate navigation links based on module paths",
+        "Format output as Markdown"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Module Documentation (IMPL-002+)
+**Purpose**: Module-level documentation
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/modules/[name]/README.md`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-002",
+  "title": "Document Module: 'auth'",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "module-documentation"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document module purpose, internal architecture, public API",
+      "Include dependencies and usage examples",
+      "Use Module-Level Documentation Template"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete .workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md",
+      "All exported functions/classes documented",
+      "Working code examples included"
+    ],
+    "scope": "auth module only"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_module_content",
+        "action": "Perform deep analysis of the specific module's content",
+        "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document 'auth' module comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}\\nEXPECTED: Structured analysis of module content\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+        "output_to": "module_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Analysis strictly limited to focus_paths ('src/auth') - controlled context"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Use the detailed [module_analysis] to populate the Module-Level Documentation Template",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt",
+        "Fill sections using [module_analysis]",
+        "Generate code examples from actual usage",
+        "Format output as Markdown"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### 3. Architecture Documentation (if requested)
+**Purpose**: System design and patterns
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/architecture/`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N-1",
+  "title": "Generate Architecture Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "qwen",
+    "template": "architecture"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document system design patterns and architectural decisions",
+      "Create module interaction diagrams",
+      "Explain data flow and component relationships"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["."],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete architecture documentation in .workflow/docs/architecture/",
+      "Diagrams explaining system design",
+      "Clear explanation of architectural patterns"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_all_module_docs",
+        "action": "Aggregate all module documentation",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/modules -name 'README.md' -exec cat {} \\;)",
+        "output_to": "module_docs",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_architecture",
+        "action": "Synthesize system architecture from modules",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Synthesize system architecture\\nTASK: Create architecture documentation from module docs\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture documentation with patterns\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt) | Focus on design patterns, data flow, component interactions\")",
+        "output_to": "architecture_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Command varies: gemini-wrapper (default) | qwen-wrapper | codex exec"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Create architecture documentation from synthesis",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Parse architecture_analysis for patterns and design decisions",
+        "Create text-based diagrams (mermaid/ASCII) for module interactions",
+        "Document data flow between components",
+        "Explain architectural decisions and trade-offs",
+        "Format as structured documentation"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/architecture/system-design.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/architecture/module-map.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/architecture/data-flow.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### 4. API Documentation (if requested)
+**Purpose**: API reference and specifications
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/api/README.md`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N",
+  "title": "Generate Unified API Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "api-reference"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document all API endpoints with request/response formats",
+      "Include authentication and error handling",
+      "Generate OpenAPI specification if applicable",
+      "Use API-Level Documentation Template"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/api", "src/routes", "src/controllers"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete .workflow/docs/api/README.md following template",
+      "All endpoints documented with examples",
+      "OpenAPI spec generated if REST API detected"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "discover_api_endpoints",
+        "action": "Find all API routes and endpoints using MCP",
+        "command": "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern='router\\.|app\\.|@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch)', file_pattern='*.{ts,js}', output_mode='content', head_limit=100)",
+        "output_to": "endpoint_discovery",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional",
+        "note": "Use MCP instead of rg for better structure"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_api_structure",
+        "action": "Analyze API structure and patterns",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document API comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract endpoints, auth, request/response formats\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*,src/routes/**/*,src/controllers/**/*}\\nEXPECTED: Complete API documentation\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt)\")",
+        "output_to": "api_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Analysis limited to API-related paths - controlled context"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Use api_analysis to populate API-Level Documentation Template",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt",
+        "Parse api_analysis for: endpoints, auth, request/response",
+        "Fill template sections with extracted information",
+        "Generate OpenAPI spec if REST API detected",
+        "Format output as Markdown"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/api/README.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/api/openapi.yaml"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Planning Outputs
+
+### File Structure
+```
+.workflow/
+├── .active-WFS-docs-20240120-143022
+└── WFS-docs-20240120-143022/
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Implementation plan
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracker
+    ├── .process/
+    │   ├── strategy.md           # Doc strategy
+    │   └── existing-docs.txt     # Existing docs list
+    └── .task/
+        ├── IMPL-001.json         # System overview
+        ├── IMPL-002.json         # Module: auth
+        ├── IMPL-003.json         # Module: api
+        ├── IMPL-004.json         # Architecture
+        └── IMPL-005.json         # API docs
+```
+
+### IMPL_PLAN.md
+```markdown
+# Documentation Implementation Plan
+
+**Session**: WFS-docs-[timestamp]
+**Type**: [architecture|api|all]
+**Tool**: [gemini|qwen|codex]
+
+## Task Breakdown
+
+### IMPL-001: System Overview
+- **Output**: .workflow/docs/README.md
+- **Template**: project-overview.txt
+
+### IMPL-002+: Module Documentation
+- **Modules**: [list]
+- **Template**: module-documentation.txt
+
+### IMPL-N: Architecture/API (if requested)
+- **Template**: architecture.txt / api-reference.txt
+
+## Execution Order
+1. IMPL-001 (Foundation)
+2. IMPL-002 to IMPL-[M] (Modules - can parallelize)
+3. IMPL-[M+1] (Architecture - needs modules)
+4. IMPL-[N] (API - can run after IMPL-001)
+```
+
+### TODO_LIST.md
+```markdown
+# Documentation Progress Tracker
+
+- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Generate Project Overview
+- [ ] **IMPL-002**: Document Module: 'auth'
+- [ ] **IMPL-003**: Document Module: 'api'
+- [ ] **IMPL-004**: Generate Architecture Documentation
+- [ ] **IMPL-005**: Generate Unified API Documentation
+
+## Execution
+```bash
+/workflow:execute IMPL-001
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002
+# ...
+```
+```
+
+## Execution Phase
+
+### Via /workflow:execute
+
+```
+For Each Task (IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...):
+
+/workflow:execute IMPL-NNN
+    ↓
+TodoWrite: pending → in_progress
+    ↓
+Execute flow_control (pre_analysis steps)
+    ↓
+Generate Documentation (apply template)
+    ↓
+TodoWrite: in_progress → completed
+    ↓
+✅ Task Complete
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Status Tracking
+
+**Planning Phase**:
+```
+✅ Session initialization (completed)
+⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
+```
+
+**Execution Phase**:
+```
+Executing IMPL-001:
+✅ Session initialization
+🔄 IMPL-001: Project Overview (in_progress)
+⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth'
+
+After IMPL-001:
+✅ Session initialization
+✅ IMPL-001: Project Overview (completed)
+🔄 IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (in_progress)
+```
+
+## Documentation Output
+
+### Final Structure
+```
+.workflow/docs/
+├── README.md                     # IMPL-001: Project overview
+├── modules/
+│   ├── auth/README.md           # IMPL-002: Auth module
+│   └── api/README.md            # IMPL-003: API module
+├── architecture/                # IMPL-004: Architecture
+│   ├── system-design.md
+│   ├── module-map.md
+│   └── data-flow.md
+└── api/                         # IMPL-005: API docs
+    ├── README.md
+    └── openapi.yaml
+```
+
+## Next Steps
+
+### 1. Review Planning Output
+```bash
+cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL_PLAN.md
+cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/TODO_LIST.md
+```
+
+### 2. Execute Documentation Tasks
+```bash
+# Sequential (recommended)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-001  # System overview first
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002  # Module docs
+/workflow:execute IMPL-003
+/workflow:execute IMPL-004  # Architecture
+/workflow:execute IMPL-005  # API docs
+
+# Parallel (module docs only)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002 &
+/workflow:execute IMPL-003 &
+wait
+```
+
+### 3. Review Generated Documentation
+```bash
+ls -lah .workflow/docs/
+cat .workflow/docs/README.md
+```
+
+### 4. TodoWrite Progress
+- Planning: All tasks `pending`
+- Execution: `pending` → `in_progress` → `completed`
+- Real-time status updates via TodoWrite
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **No modules found**: Create only IMPL-001 (system overview)
+- **Scope path invalid**: Show error and exit
+- **Active session exists**: Prompt to complete or pause
+- **Tool unavailable**: Fall back to gemini
+
+## Key Benefits
+
+### Clear Separation of Concerns
+- **Planning**: Session creation, task decomposition (this command)
+- **Execution**: Content generation, quality assurance (doc-generator agent)
+
+### Scalable Task Management
+- Independent, self-contained tasks
+- Parallelizable module documentation
+- Clear dependencies (architecture needs modules)
+
+### Template-Driven Consistency
+- All documentation follows standard templates
+- Reusable and maintainable
+- Easy to update standards
+
+### Full Context for Execution
+- Each task JSON contains complete instructions
+- flow_control defines exact analysis steps
+- Tool selection for flexibility

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,631 @@
+---
+name: task-generate-agent
+description: Autonomous task generation using action-planning-agent with discovery and output phases
+usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session <session_id>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
+---
+
+# Autonomous Task Generation Command
+
+## Overview
+Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
+- **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
+- **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
+- **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and research
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading
+**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
+
+**Agent Context Package**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-[session-id]",
+  "session_metadata": {
+    // If in memory: use cached content
+    // Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
+  },
+  "analysis_results": {
+    // If in memory: use cached content
+    // Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+  },
+  "artifacts_inventory": {
+    // If in memory: use cached list
+    // Else: Scan .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/ directory
+    "synthesis_specification": "path or null",
+    "topic_framework": "path or null",
+    "role_analyses": ["paths"]
+  },
+  "context_package": {
+    // If in memory: use cached content
+    // Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
+  },
+  "mcp_capabilities": {
+    "code_index": true,
+    "exa_code": true,
+    "exa_web": true
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Discovery Actions**:
+1. **Load Session Context** (if not in memory)
+   ```javascript
+   if (!memory.has("workflow-session.json")) {
+     Read(.workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json)
+   }
+   ```
+
+2. **Load Analysis Results** (if not in memory)
+   ```javascript
+   if (!memory.has("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")) {
+     Read(.workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Discover Artifacts** (if not in memory)
+   ```javascript
+   if (!memory.has("artifacts_inventory")) {
+     bash(find .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/ -name "*.md" -type f)
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **MCP Code Analysis** (optional - enhance understanding)
+   ```javascript
+   // Find relevant files for task context
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="authentication|oauth",
+     file_pattern="*.ts"
+   )
+   ```
+
+5. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather best practices)
+   ```javascript
+   // Get external examples for implementation
+   mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+     query="TypeScript JWT authentication best practices",
+     tokensNum="dynamic"
+   )
+   ```
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
+
+**Agent Invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
+  description="Generate task JSON and implementation plan",
+  prompt=`
+## Execution Context
+
+**Session ID**: WFS-{session-id}
+**Mode**: Two-Phase Autonomous Task Generation
+
+## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
+
+### Session Metadata
+{session_metadata_content}
+
+### Analysis Results
+{analysis_results_content}
+
+### Artifacts Inventory
+- **Synthesis Specification**: {synthesis_spec_path}
+- **Topic Framework**: {topic_framework_path}
+- **Role Analyses**: {role_analyses_list}
+
+### Context Package
+{context_package_summary}
+
+### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
+**Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
+**External Research**: {mcp_exa_research_results}
+
+## Phase 2: Document Generation Task
+
+### Task Decomposition Standards
+**Core Principle**: Task Merging Over Decomposition
+- **Merge Rule**: Execute together when possible
+- **Decompose Only When**:
+  - Excessive workload (>2500 lines or >6 files)
+  - Different tech stacks or domains
+  - Sequential dependency blocking
+  - Parallel execution needed
+
+**Task Limits**:
+- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit)
+- **Function-based**: Complete units (logic + UI + tests + config)
+- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5) | Two-level (6-10) | Re-scope (>10)
+
+### Required Outputs
+
+#### 1. Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/.task/
+**Schema**: 5-field enhanced schema with artifacts
+
+**Required Fields**:
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N[.M]",
+  "title": "Descriptive task name",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test|docs",
+    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": ["extracted from analysis"],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/paths"],
+    "acceptance": ["measurable criteria"],
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-N"],
+    "artifacts": [
+      {
+        "type": "synthesis_specification",
+        "path": "{synthesis_spec_path}",
+        "priority": "highest",
+        "usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "role_analysis",
+        "path": "{role_analysis_path}",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
+        "note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files included based on brainstorming results"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "topic_framework",
+        "path": "{topic_framework_path}",
+        "priority": "low",
+        "usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
+        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(ls {synthesis_spec_path} 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')",
+          "Read({synthesis_spec_path})"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
+        "action": "Explore codebase using MCP",
+        "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\\"[patterns]\\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\\"[patterns]\\")",
+        "output_to": "codebase_structure"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_task_patterns",
+        "action": "Analyze existing code patterns",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cd \\"[focus_paths]\\")",
+          "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \\"PURPOSE: Analyze patterns TASK: Review '[title]' CONTEXT: [synthesis_specification] EXPECTED: Pattern analysis RULES: Prioritize synthesis-specification.md\\")"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "task_context",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+      "modification_points": ["Apply requirements from synthesis"],
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load synthesis specification",
+        "Analyze existing patterns",
+        "Implement following specification",
+        "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
+        "Validate against acceptance criteria"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
+  }
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+#### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md
+**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
+**Structure**:
+\`\`\`markdown
+---
+identifier: WFS-{session-id}
+source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
+analysis: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+artifacts: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/
+context_package: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
+workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design"  # Indicates execution model
+verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
+  concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
+  action_plan_verify: "pending"
+phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → analysis → concept_verify → planning"  # CCW workflow phases
+---
+
+# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
+
+## 1. Summary
+Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
+
+**Core Objectives**:
+- [Key objective 1]
+- [Key objective 2]
+
+**Technical Approach**:
+- [High-level approach]
+
+## 2. Context Analysis
+
+### CCW Workflow Context
+**Phase Progression**:
+- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (synthesis-specification.md generated)
+- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
+- ✅ Phase 3: Enhanced Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel insights)
+- ✅ Phase 4: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, synthesis updated | skipped)
+- ⏳ Phase 5: Action Planning (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md)
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (0 ambiguities remaining) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
+- action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
+
+**Context Package Summary**:
+- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
+- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
+- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
+- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {dependency count} dependencies identified
+
+### Project Profile
+- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
+- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
+- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
+- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
+
+### Module Structure
+\`\`\`
+[Directory tree showing key modules]
+\`\`\`
+
+### Dependencies
+**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
+**APIs**: [External services]
+**Development**: [Testing, linting, CI/CD tools]
+
+### Patterns & Conventions
+- **Architecture**: [Key patterns like DI, Event-Driven]
+- **Component Design**: [Design patterns]
+- **State Management**: [State strategy]
+- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
+
+## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
+
+### Artifact Usage Strategy
+**Primary Reference (synthesis-specification.md)**:
+- **What**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint from multi-role synthesis
+- **When**: Every task references this first for requirements and design decisions
+- **How**: Extract architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns, functional requirements, non-functional requirements
+- **Priority**: Authoritative - overrides role-specific analyses when conflicts arise
+- **CCW Value**: Consolidates insights from all brainstorming roles into single source of truth
+
+**Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
+- **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
+- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure
+- **Usage**: Tasks load this via \`flow_control.preparatory_steps\` for environment setup
+- **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
+
+**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
+- **What**: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel analysis results
+- **Content**: Optimization strategies, risk assessment, architecture review, implementation patterns
+- **Usage**: Referenced in task planning for technical guidance and risk mitigation
+- **CCW Value**: Multi-model parallel analysis providing comprehensive technical intelligence
+
+### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
+- **synthesis-specification.md**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
+  - Contains: Architecture design, UI/UX guidelines, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation roadmap, risk assessment
+
+### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
+- **topic-framework.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
+- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Detailed architecture specifications
+- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Layout and component specifications
+- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Product vision and user stories
+
+**Artifact Priority in Development**:
+1. synthesis-specification.md (primary reference for all tasks)
+2. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
+3. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis and optimization strategies)
+4. Role-specific analyses (fallback for detailed specifications)
+
+## 4. Implementation Strategy
+
+### Execution Strategy
+**Execution Model**: [Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles]
+
+**Rationale**: [Why this execution model fits the project]
+
+**Parallelization Opportunities**:
+- [List independent workstreams]
+
+**Serialization Requirements**:
+- [List critical dependencies]
+
+### Architectural Approach
+**Key Architecture Decisions**:
+- [ADR references from synthesis]
+- [Justification for architecture patterns]
+
+**Integration Strategy**:
+- [How modules communicate]
+- [State management approach]
+
+### Key Dependencies
+**Task Dependency Graph**:
+\`\`\`
+[High-level dependency visualization]
+\`\`\`
+
+**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
+
+### Testing Strategy
+**Testing Approach**:
+- Unit testing: [Tools, scope]
+- Integration testing: [Key integration points]
+- E2E testing: [Critical user flows]
+
+**Coverage Targets**:
+- Lines: ≥70%
+- Functions: ≥70%
+- Branches: ≥65%
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- [CI/CD gates]
+- [Performance budgets]
+
+## 5. Task Breakdown Summary
+
+### Task Count
+**{N} tasks** (flat hierarchy | two-level hierarchy, sequential | parallel execution)
+
+### Task Structure
+- **IMPL-1**: [Main task title]
+- **IMPL-2**: [Main task title]
+...
+
+### Complexity Assessment
+- **High**: [List with rationale]
+- **Medium**: [List]
+- **Low**: [List]
+
+### Dependencies
+[Reference Section 4.3 for dependency graph]
+
+**Parallelization Opportunities**:
+- [Specific task groups that can run in parallel]
+
+## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
+
+### Execution Strategy
+
+**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): [Phase Name]**
+- **Tasks**: IMPL-1, IMPL-2
+- **Deliverables**:
+  - [Specific deliverable 1]
+  - [Specific deliverable 2]
+- **Success Criteria**:
+  - [Measurable criterion]
+
+**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): [Phase Name]**
+...
+
+### Resource Requirements
+
+**Development Team**:
+- [Team composition and skills]
+
+**External Dependencies**:
+- [Third-party services, APIs]
+
+**Infrastructure**:
+- [Development, staging, production environments]
+
+## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
+
+| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
+|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
+| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Strategy] | [Role] |
+
+**Critical Risks** (High impact + High probability):
+- [Risk 1]: [Detailed mitigation plan]
+
+**Monitoring Strategy**:
+- [How risks will be monitored]
+
+## 8. Success Criteria
+
+**Functional Completeness**:
+- [ ] All requirements from synthesis-specification.md implemented
+- [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
+
+**Technical Quality**:
+- [ ] Test coverage ≥70%
+- [ ] Bundle size within budget
+- [ ] Performance targets met
+
+**Operational Readiness**:
+- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
+- [ ] Monitoring and logging configured
+- [ ] Documentation complete
+
+**Business Metrics**:
+- [ ] [Key business metrics from synthesis]
+\`\`\`
+
+#### 3. TODO_LIST.md
+**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md
+**Structure**:
+\`\`\`markdown
+# Tasks: {Session Topic}
+
+## Task Progress
+▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
+  - [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
+  - [ ] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json)
+
+- [ ] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json)
+
+## Status Legend
+- \`▸\` = Container task (has subtasks)
+- \`- [ ]\` = Pending leaf task
+- \`- [x]\` = Completed leaf task
+\`\`\`
+
+### Execution Instructions
+
+**Step 1: Extract Task Definitions**
+- Parse analysis results for task recommendations
+- Extract task ID, title, requirements, complexity
+- Map artifacts to relevant tasks based on type
+
+**Step 2: Generate Task JSON Files**
+- Create individual .task/IMPL-*.json files
+- Embed artifacts array with detected brainstorming outputs
+- Generate flow_control with artifact loading steps
+- Add MCP tool integration for codebase exploration
+
+**Step 3: Create IMPL_PLAN.md**
+- Summarize requirements and technical approach
+- List detected artifacts with priorities
+- Document task breakdown and dependencies
+- Define execution strategy and success criteria
+
+**Step 4: Generate TODO_LIST.md**
+- List all tasks with container/leaf structure
+- Link to task JSON files
+- Use proper status indicators (▸, [ ], [x])
+
+**Step 5: Update Session State**
+- Update .workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
+- Mark session as ready for execution
+- Record task count and artifact inventory
+
+### MCP Enhancement Examples
+
+**Code Index Usage**:
+\`\`\`javascript
+// Discover authentication-related files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
+
+// Search for OAuth patterns
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="oauth|jwt|authentication",
+  file_pattern="*.{ts,js}"
+)
+
+// Get file summary for key components
+mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(
+  file_path="src/auth/index.ts"
+)
+\`\`\`
+
+**Exa Research Usage**:
+\`\`\`javascript
+// Get best practices for task implementation
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+  query="TypeScript OAuth2 implementation patterns",
+  tokensNum="dynamic"
+)
+
+// Research specific API usage
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+  query="Express.js JWT middleware examples",
+  tokensNum=5000
+)
+\`\`\`
+
+### Quality Validation
+
+Before completion, verify:
+- [ ] All task JSON files created in .task/ directory
+- [ ] Each task JSON has 5 required fields
+- [ ] Artifact references correctly mapped
+- [ ] Flow control includes artifact loading steps
+- [ ] MCP tool integration added where appropriate
+- [ ] IMPL_PLAN.md follows required structure
+- [ ] TODO_LIST.md matches task JSONs
+- [ ] Dependency graph is acyclic
+- [ ] Task count within limits (≤10)
+- [ ] Session state updated
+
+## Output
+
+Generate all three documents and report completion status:
+- Task JSON files created: N files
+- Artifacts integrated: synthesis-spec, topic-framework, N role analyses
+- MCP enhancements: code-index, exa-research
+- Session ready for execution: /workflow:execute
+`
+)
+```
+
+## Command Integration
+
+### Usage
+```bash
+# Basic usage
+/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
+
+# Called by /workflow:plan
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-[id]")
+```
+
+### Agent Context Passing
+
+**Memory-Aware Context Assembly**:
+```javascript
+// Assemble context package for agent
+const agentContext = {
+  session_id: "WFS-[id]",
+
+  // Use memory if available, else load
+  session_metadata: memory.has("workflow-session.json")
+    ? memory.get("workflow-session.json")
+    : Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/workflow-session.json),
+
+  analysis_results: memory.has("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
+    ? memory.get("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
+    : Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md),
+
+  artifacts_inventory: memory.has("artifacts_inventory")
+    ? memory.get("artifacts_inventory")
+    : discoverArtifacts(),
+
+  context_package: memory.has("context-package.json")
+    ? memory.get("context-package.json")
+    : Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json),
+
+  // Optional MCP enhancements
+  mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
+}
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates planning and calls this command
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate` - Manual version without agent
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package
+- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides analysis results
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks
+
+## Key Differences from task-generate
+
+| Feature | task-generate | task-generate-agent |
+|---------|--------------|-------------------|
+| Execution | Manual/scripted | Agent-driven |
+| Phases | 6 phases | 2 phases (discovery + output) |
+| MCP Integration | Optional | Enhanced with examples |
+| Decision Logic | Command-driven | Agent-autonomous |
+| Complexity | Higher control | Simpler delegation |

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-tdd.md

@@ -0,0 +1,723 @@
+---
+name: task-generate-tdd
+description: Generate TDD task chains with Red-Green-Refactor dependencies
+usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session <session_id> [--agent]
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--agent]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth --agent
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*), TodoWrite(*)
+---
+
+# TDD Task Generation Command
+
+## Overview
+Generate TDD-specific task chains from analysis results with enforced Red-Green-Refactor structure and dependencies.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **TDD-First**: Every feature starts with a failing test
+- **Chain-Enforced**: Dependencies ensure proper TDD cycle
+- **Phase-Explicit**: Each task marked with Red/Green/Refactor phase
+- **Artifact-Aware**: Integrates brainstorming outputs
+- **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from memory
+- **Context-Aware**: Analyzes existing codebase and test patterns
+- **Iterative Green Phase**: Auto-diagnose and fix test failures with Gemini + optional Codex
+- **Safety-First**: Auto-revert on max iterations to prevent broken state
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Parse analysis results and identify testable features
+- Generate Red-Green-Refactor task chains for each feature
+- Enforce proper dependencies (TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR)
+- Create TDD_PLAN.md and enhanced IMPL_PLAN.md
+- Generate TODO_LIST.md with TDD phase indicators
+- Update session state for TDD execution
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
+**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
+
+1. **Session Validation**
+   - If session metadata in memory → Skip loading
+   - Else: Load `.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+
+2. **Analysis Results Loading**
+   - If ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md in memory → Skip loading
+   - Else: Read `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+
+3. **Artifact Discovery**
+   - If artifact inventory in memory → Skip scanning
+   - Else: Scan `.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorming/` directory
+   - Detect: synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses
+
+### Phase 2: TDD Task JSON Generation
+
+**Input**: Use `.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` directly (enhanced with TDD structure from concept-enhanced phase)
+
+**Note**: The ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md now includes TDD-specific breakdown:
+- Feature list with testable requirements
+- Test cases for Red phase
+- Implementation requirements for Green phase
+- Refactoring opportunities
+- Task dependencies and execution order
+
+### Phase 3: Enhanced IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+
+#### Task Chain Structure
+For each feature, generate 3 tasks with ID format:
+- **TEST-N.M** (Red phase)
+- **IMPL-N.M** (Green phase)
+- **REFACTOR-N.M** (Refactor phase)
+
+#### Chain Dependency Rules
+- **IMPL depends_on TEST**: Cannot implement before test exists
+- **REFACTOR depends_on IMPL**: Cannot refactor before implementation
+- **Cross-feature dependencies**: If Feature 2 needs Feature 1, then `IMPL-2.1 depends_on ["REFACTOR-1.1"]`
+
+#### Agent Assignment
+- **TEST tasks** → `@code-review-test-agent`
+- **IMPL tasks** → `@code-developer`
+- **REFACTOR tasks** → `@code-developer`
+
+#### Meta Fields
+- `meta.type`: "test" | "feature" | "refactor"
+- `meta.agent`: Agent for task execution
+- `meta.tdd_phase`: "red" | "green" | "refactor"
+
+#### Task JSON Examples
+
+**RED Phase - Test Task (TEST-1.1.json)**
+```json
+{
+  "id": "TEST-1.1",
+  "title": "Write failing test for user authentication",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test",
+    "agent": "@code-review-test-agent",
+    "tdd_phase": "red"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Write test case for login with valid credentials",
+      "Test should fail with 'AuthService not implemented' error",
+      "Include tests for invalid credentials and edge cases"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["tests/auth/login.test.ts"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Test file created with at least 3 test cases",
+      "Test runs and fails with clear error message",
+      "Test assertions define expected behavior"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": []
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "check_test_framework",
+        "action": "Verify test framework is configured",
+        "command": "bash(npm list jest || npm list vitest)",
+        "output_to": "test_framework_info",
+        "on_error": "warn"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**GREEN Phase - Implementation Task (IMPL-1.1.json)**
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-1.1",
+  "title": "Implement user authentication to pass tests",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "feature",
+    "agent": "@code-developer",
+    "tdd_phase": "green",
+    "max_iterations": 3,
+    "use_codex": false
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Implement minimal AuthService to pass TEST-1.1",
+      "Handle valid and invalid credentials",
+      "Return appropriate success/error responses",
+      "If tests fail after implementation, diagnose and fix iteratively"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts", "tests/auth/login.test.ts"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "All tests in TEST-1.1 pass",
+      "Implementation is minimal and focused",
+      "No over-engineering or premature optimization",
+      "Test failures resolved within iteration limit"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": ["TEST-1.1"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_test_requirements",
+        "action": "Read test specifications from TEST phase",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-xxx/.summaries/TEST-1.1-summary.md)",
+        "output_to": "test_requirements",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "verify_tests_failing",
+        "action": "Confirm tests are currently failing (Red phase validation)",
+        "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts || echo 'Tests failing as expected')",
+        "output_to": "initial_test_status",
+        "on_error": "warn"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_test_context",
+        "action": "Load test patterns and framework info",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process/test-context-package.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')",
+        "output_to": "test_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Write minimal code to pass tests, then enter iterative fix cycle if they still fail",
+      "initial_implementation": [
+        "Write minimal code based on test requirements",
+        "Execute test suite: bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+        "If tests pass → Complete task",
+        "If tests fail → Capture failure logs and proceed to test-fix cycle"
+      ],
+      "test_fix_cycle": {
+        "max_iterations": 3,
+        "cycle_pattern": "gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if meta.use_codex=true) → retest",
+        "tools": {
+          "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
+          "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex if meta.use_codex=true",
+          "verification": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)"
+        },
+        "exit_conditions": {
+          "success": "all_tests_pass",
+          "failure": "max_iterations_reached"
+        },
+        "steps": [
+          "ITERATION LOOP (max 3):",
+          "  1. Gemini Diagnosis:",
+          "     bash(cd .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p \"",
+          "     PURPOSE: Diagnose TDD Green phase test failure iteration [N]",
+          "     TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations",
+          "     MODE: analysis",
+          "     CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}",
+          "              Test output: [test_failures]",
+          "              Test requirements: [test_requirements]",
+          "              Implementation: [focus_paths]",
+          "     EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes",
+          "     RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [test_failure_description]",
+          "            Minimal surgical fixes only - stay in Green phase",
+          "     \" > green-fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md)",
+          "  2. Apply Fix (check meta.use_codex):",
+          "     IF meta.use_codex=false (default): Present diagnosis to user for manual fix",
+          "     IF meta.use_codex=true: Codex applies fix automatically",
+          "  3. Retest: bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+          "  4. If pass → Exit loop, complete task",
+          "     If fail → Continue to next iteration",
+          "IF max_iterations reached: Revert changes, report failure"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    "post_completion": [
+      {
+        "step": "verify_tests_passing",
+        "action": "Confirm all tests now pass (Green phase achieved)",
+        "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+        "output_to": "final_test_status",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      }
+    ],
+    "error_handling": {
+      "max_iterations_reached": {
+        "action": "revert_all_changes",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
+          "bash(echo 'TDD Green phase failed: Unable to pass tests within 3 iterations' > .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process/green-phase-failure.md)"
+        ],
+        "report": "Generate failure report in .summaries/IMPL-1.1-failure-report.md"
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**REFACTOR Phase - Refactoring Task (REFACTOR-1.1.json)**
+```json
+{
+  "id": "REFACTOR-1.1",
+  "title": "Refactor authentication implementation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "refactor",
+    "agent": "@code-developer",
+    "tdd_phase": "refactor"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Improve code quality while keeping tests green",
+      "Remove duplication in credential validation",
+      "Improve error handling and logging",
+      "Enhance code readability and maintainability"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts", "tests/auth/login.test.ts"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Code quality improved (complexity, readability)",
+      "All tests still pass after refactoring",
+      "No new functionality added",
+      "Duplication eliminated"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-1.1"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "verify_tests_passing",
+        "action": "Run tests to confirm green state before refactoring",
+        "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+        "output_to": "test_status",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_code_quality",
+        "action": "Run linter and complexity analysis",
+        "command": "bash(npm run lint src/auth/AuthService.ts)",
+        "output_to": "quality_metrics",
+        "on_error": "warn"
+      }
+    ],
+    "post_completion": [
+      {
+        "step": "verify_tests_still_passing",
+        "action": "Confirm tests remain green after refactoring",
+        "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+        "output_to": "final_test_status",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Unified IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+
+Generate single comprehensive IMPL_PLAN.md with enhanced 8-section structure:
+
+**Frontmatter**:
+```yaml
+---
+identifier: WFS-{session-id}
+source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
+analysis: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+artifacts: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/
+context_package: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
+workflow_type: "tdd"  # TDD-specific workflow
+verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
+  concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
+  action_plan_verify: "pending"
+phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → test_context → analysis → concept_verify → tdd_planning"  # TDD workflow phases
+feature_count: N
+task_count: 3N
+tdd_chains: N
+---
+```
+
+**Complete Structure** (8 Sections):
+
+```markdown
+# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
+
+## 1. Summary
+Core requirements, objectives, and TDD-specific technical approach (2-3 paragraphs max).
+
+**Core Objectives**:
+- [Key objective 1]
+- [Key objective 2]
+
+**Technical Approach**:
+- TDD-driven development with Red-Green-Refactor cycles
+- [Other high-level approaches]
+
+## 2. Context Analysis
+
+### CCW Workflow Context
+**Phase Progression** (TDD-specific):
+- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (synthesis-specification.md generated)
+- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
+- ✅ Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis (test-context-package.json: existing test patterns identified)
+- ✅ Phase 4: TDD Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: test-first requirements with Gemini/Qwen insights)
+- ✅ Phase 5: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, test requirements clarified | skipped)
+- ⏳ Phase 6: TDD Task Generation (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md with TDD chains)
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (test requirements clarified, 0 ambiguities) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
+- action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute for TDD dependency validation)
+
+**Context Package Summary**:
+- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
+- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
+- **Test Context**: {existing test patterns, coverage baseline, test framework detected}
+- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
+- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {test file count} tests identified
+
+### Project Profile
+- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
+- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
+- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
+- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
+- **TDD Framework**: Testing framework and tools
+
+### Module Structure
+```
+[Directory tree showing key modules and test directories]
+```
+
+### Dependencies
+**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
+**Testing**: [Test framework, mocking libraries]
+**Development**: [Linting, CI/CD tools]
+
+### Patterns & Conventions
+- **Architecture**: [Key patterns]
+- **Testing Patterns**: [Unit, integration, E2E patterns]
+- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
+
+## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
+
+### Artifact Usage Strategy
+**Primary Reference (synthesis-specification.md)**:
+- **What**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint from multi-role synthesis
+- **When**: Every TDD task (TEST/IMPL/REFACTOR) references this for requirements and acceptance criteria
+- **How**: Extract testable requirements, architecture decisions, expected behaviors
+- **Priority**: Authoritative - defines what to test and how to implement
+- **CCW Value**: Consolidates insights from all brainstorming roles into single source of truth for TDD
+
+**Context Intelligence (context-package.json & test-context-package.json)**:
+- **What**: Smart context from CCW's context-gather and test-context-gather phases
+- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing test patterns, test framework configuration
+- **Usage**: RED phase loads test patterns, GREEN phase loads implementation context
+- **CCW Value**: Automated discovery of existing tests and patterns for TDD consistency
+
+**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
+- **What**: Gemini/Qwen parallel analysis with TDD-specific breakdown
+- **Content**: Testable requirements, test scenarios, implementation strategies, risk assessment
+- **Usage**: RED phase references test cases, GREEN phase references implementation approach
+- **CCW Value**: Multi-model analysis providing comprehensive TDD guidance
+
+### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
+- **synthesis-specification.md**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
+  - Contains: Architecture design, functional/non-functional requirements
+
+### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
+- **topic-framework.md**: Discussion framework
+- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Architecture specifications
+- **Role-specific analyses**: [Other relevant analyses]
+
+**Artifact Priority in Development**:
+1. synthesis-specification.md (primary reference for test cases and implementation)
+2. test-context-package.json (existing test patterns for TDD consistency)
+3. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
+4. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis with TDD breakdown)
+5. Role-specific analyses (supplementary)
+
+## 4. Implementation Strategy
+
+### Execution Strategy
+**Execution Model**: TDD Cycles (Red-Green-Refactor)
+
+**Rationale**: Test-first approach ensures correctness and reduces bugs
+
+**TDD Cycle Pattern**:
+- RED: Write failing test
+- GREEN: Implement minimal code to pass (with test-fix cycle if needed)
+- REFACTOR: Improve code quality while keeping tests green
+
+**Parallelization Opportunities**:
+- [Independent features that can be developed in parallel]
+
+### Architectural Approach
+**Key Architecture Decisions**:
+- [ADR references from synthesis]
+- [TDD-compatible architecture patterns]
+
+**Integration Strategy**:
+- [How modules communicate]
+- [Test isolation strategy]
+
+### Key Dependencies
+**Task Dependency Graph**:
+```
+Feature 1:
+  TEST-1.1 (RED)
+      ↓
+  IMPL-1.1 (GREEN) [with test-fix cycle]
+      ↓
+  REFACTOR-1.1 (REFACTOR)
+
+Feature 2:
+  TEST-2.1 (RED) [depends on REFACTOR-1.1 if related]
+      ↓
+  IMPL-2.1 (GREEN)
+      ↓
+  REFACTOR-2.1 (REFACTOR)
+```
+
+**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck features]
+
+### Testing Strategy
+**TDD Testing Approach**:
+- Unit testing: Each feature has comprehensive unit tests
+- Integration testing: Cross-feature integration
+- E2E testing: Critical user flows after all TDD cycles
+
+**Coverage Targets**:
+- Lines: ≥80% (TDD ensures high coverage)
+- Functions: ≥80%
+- Branches: ≥75%
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- All tests must pass before moving to next phase
+- Refactor phase must maintain test success
+
+## 5. TDD Task Chains (TDD-Specific Section)
+
+### Feature-by-Feature TDD Chains
+
+**Feature 1: {Feature Name}**
+```
+🔴 TEST-1.1: Write failing test for {feature}
+    ↓
+🟢 IMPL-1.1: Implement to pass tests (includes test-fix cycle: max 3 iterations)
+    ↓
+🔵 REFACTOR-1.1: Refactor implementation while keeping tests green
+```
+
+**Feature 2: {Feature Name}**
+```
+🔴 TEST-2.1: Write failing test for {feature}
+    ↓
+🟢 IMPL-2.1: Implement to pass tests (includes test-fix cycle)
+    ↓
+🔵 REFACTOR-2.1: Refactor implementation
+```
+
+[Continue for all N features]
+
+### TDD Task Breakdown Summary
+- **Total Features**: {N}
+- **Total Tasks**: {3N} (N TEST + N IMPL + N REFACTOR)
+- **TDD Chains**: {N}
+
+## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
+
+### Execution Strategy
+
+**TDD Cycle Execution**: Feature-by-feature sequential TDD cycles
+
+**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): Foundation Features**
+- **Features**: Feature 1, Feature 2
+- **Tasks**: TEST-1.1, IMPL-1.1, REFACTOR-1.1, TEST-2.1, IMPL-2.1, REFACTOR-2.1
+- **Deliverables**:
+  - Complete TDD cycles for foundation features
+  - All tests passing
+- **Success Criteria**:
+  - ≥80% test coverage
+  - All RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles completed
+
+**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): Advanced Features**
+[Continue with remaining features]
+
+### Resource Requirements
+
+**Development Team**:
+- [Team composition with TDD experience]
+
+**External Dependencies**:
+- [Testing frameworks, mocking services]
+
+**Infrastructure**:
+- [CI/CD with test automation]
+
+## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
+
+| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
+|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
+| Tests fail repeatedly in GREEN phase | High | Medium | Test-fix cycle (max 3 iterations) with auto-revert | Dev Team |
+| Complex features hard to test | High | Medium | Break down into smaller testable units | Architect |
+| [Other risks] | Med/Low | Med/Low | [Strategies] | [Owner] |
+
+**Critical Risks** (TDD-Specific):
+- **GREEN phase failures**: Mitigated by test-fix cycle with Gemini diagnosis
+- **Test coverage gaps**: Mitigated by TDD-first approach ensuring tests before code
+
+**Monitoring Strategy**:
+- Track TDD cycle completion rate
+- Monitor test success rate per iteration
+
+## 8. Success Criteria
+
+**Functional Completeness**:
+- [ ] All features implemented through TDD cycles
+- [ ] All RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles completed successfully
+
+**Technical Quality**:
+- [ ] Test coverage ≥80% (ensured by TDD)
+- [ ] All tests passing (GREEN state achieved)
+- [ ] Code refactored for quality (REFACTOR phase completed)
+
+**Operational Readiness**:
+- [ ] CI/CD pipeline with automated test execution
+- [ ] Test failure alerting configured
+
+**TDD Compliance**:
+- [ ] Every feature has TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR chain
+- [ ] No implementation without tests (RED-first principle)
+- [ ] Refactoring did not break tests
+```
+
+### Phase 5: TODO_LIST.md Generation
+
+Generate task list with TDD phase indicators:
+```markdown
+## Feature 1: {Feature Name}
+- [ ] **TEST-1.1**: Write failing test (🔴 RED) → [📋](./.task/TEST-1.1.json)
+- [ ] **IMPL-1.1**: Implement to pass tests (🟢 GREEN) [depends: TEST-1.1] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-1.1.json)
+- [ ] **REFACTOR-1.1**: Refactor implementation (🔵 REFACTOR) [depends: IMPL-1.1] → [📋](./.task/REFACTOR-1.1.json)
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Session State Update
+
+Update workflow-session.json with TDD metadata:
+```json
+{
+  "workflow_type": "tdd",
+  "feature_count": 10,
+  "task_count": 30,
+  "tdd_chains": 10
+}
+```
+
+## Output Files Structure
+```
+.workflow/{session-id}/
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                     # Unified plan with TDD Task Chains section
+├── TODO_LIST.md                     # Progress tracking with TDD phases
+├── .task/
+│   ├── TEST-1.1.json                # Red phase task
+│   ├── IMPL-1.1.json                # Green phase task (with test-fix-cycle)
+│   ├── REFACTOR-1.1.json            # Refactor phase task
+│   └── ...
+└── .process/
+    ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md          # Enhanced with TDD breakdown from concept-enhanced
+    ├── test-context-package.json    # Test coverage analysis
+    ├── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather
+    └── green-fix-iteration-*.md     # Fix logs from Green phase
+```
+
+## Validation Rules
+
+### Chain Completeness
+- Every TEST-N.M must have corresponding IMPL-N.M and REFACTOR-N.M
+
+### Dependency Enforcement
+- IMPL-N.M must have `depends_on: ["TEST-N.M"]`
+- REFACTOR-N.M must have `depends_on: ["IMPL-N.M"]`
+
+### Task Limits
+- Maximum 10 features (30 tasks total)
+- Flat hierarchy only
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Input Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Session not found | Invalid session ID | Verify session exists |
+| Analysis missing | Incomplete planning | Run concept-enhanced first |
+
+### TDD Generation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Feature count exceeds 10 | Too many features | Re-scope requirements |
+| Missing test framework | No test config | Configure testing first |
+| Invalid chain structure | Parsing error | Fix TDD breakdown |
+
+## Integration & Usage
+
+### Command Chain
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:tdd-plan` (Phase 4)
+- **Calls**: Gemini wrapper for TDD breakdown
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute`, `/workflow:tdd-verify`
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+# Manual mode (default)
+/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth
+
+# Agent mode (autonomous task generation)
+/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth --agent
+```
+
+### Expected Output
+```
+TDD task generation complete for session: WFS-auth
+
+Features analyzed: 5
+TDD chains generated: 5
+Total tasks: 15 (5 TEST + 5 IMPL + 5 REFACTOR)
+
+Structure:
+- Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
+- Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1
+
+Plans generated:
+- Unified Plan: .workflow/WFS-auth/IMPL_PLAN.md (includes TDD Task Chains section)
+
+Next: /workflow:execute or /workflow:tdd-verify
+```
+
+## Test Coverage Analysis Integration
+
+The TDD workflow includes test coverage analysis (via `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`) to:
+- Detect existing test patterns and conventions
+- Identify current test coverage gaps
+- Discover test framework and configuration
+- Enable integration with existing tests
+
+This makes TDD workflow context-aware instead of assuming greenfield scenarios.
+
+## Iterative Green Phase with Test-Fix Cycle
+
+IMPL (Green phase) tasks include automatic test-fix cycle:
+
+**Process Flow**:
+1. **Initial Implementation**: Write minimal code to pass tests
+2. **Test Execution**: Run test suite
+3. **Success Path**: Tests pass → Complete task
+4. **Failure Path**: Tests fail → Enter iterative fix cycle:
+   - **Gemini Diagnosis**: Analyze failures with bug-fix template
+   - **Fix Application**: Manual (default) or Codex (if meta.use_codex=true)
+   - **Retest**: Verify fix resolves failures
+   - **Repeat**: Up to max_iterations (default: 3)
+5. **Safety Net**: Auto-revert all changes if max iterations reached
+
+**Key Benefits**:
+- ✅ Faster feedback loop within Green phase
+- ✅ Autonomous recovery from initial implementation errors
+- ✅ Systematic debugging with Gemini's bug-fix template
+- ✅ Safe rollback prevents broken TDD state
+
+## Configuration Options
+- **meta.max_iterations**: Number of fix attempts (default: 3 for TDD, 5 for test-gen)
+- **meta.use_codex**: Enable Codex automated fixes (default: false, manual)
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:tdd-plan` - Orchestrates TDD workflow planning (6 phases)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Analyzes test coverage
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes TDD tasks in order
+- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Verifies TDD compliance
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Post-implementation test generation

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,550 @@
+---
+name: task-generate
+description: Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with artifacts integration
+usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate --session <session_id>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
+---
+
+# Task Generation Command
+
+## Overview
+Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic artifact detection and integration.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Analysis-Driven**: Generate from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- **Artifact-Aware**: Auto-detect brainstorming outputs
+- **Context-Rich**: Embed comprehensive context in task JSON
+- **Flow-Control Ready**: Pre-define implementation steps
+- **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from memory
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Parse analysis results and extract tasks
+- Detect and integrate brainstorming artifacts
+- Generate enhanced task JSON files (5-field schema)
+- Create IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
+- Update session state for execution
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
+**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
+
+1. **Session Validation**
+   - If session metadata in memory → Skip loading
+   - Else: Load `.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+
+2. **Analysis Results Loading**
+   - If ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md in memory → Skip loading
+   - Else: Read `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+
+3. **Artifact Discovery**
+   - If artifact inventory in memory → Skip scanning
+   - Else: Scan `.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorming/` directory
+   - Detect: synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses
+
+### Phase 2: Task JSON Generation
+
+#### Task Decomposition Standards
+**Core Principle: Task Merging Over Decomposition**
+- **Merge Rule**: Execute together when possible
+- **Decompose Only When**:
+  - Excessive workload (>2500 lines or >6 files)
+  - Different tech stacks or domains
+  - Sequential dependency blocking
+  - Parallel execution needed
+
+**Task Limits**:
+- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit)
+- **Function-based**: Complete units (logic + UI + tests + config)
+- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5) | Two-level (6-10) | Re-scope (>10)
+
+#### Enhanced Task JSON Schema (5-Field + Artifacts)
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N[.M]",
+  "title": "Descriptive task name",
+  "status": "pending|active|completed|blocked|container",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
+    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": ["Clear requirement from analysis"],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/module/path", "tests/module/path"],
+    "acceptance": ["Measurable acceptance criterion"],
+    "parent": "IMPL-N",
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-N.M"],
+    "inherited": {"shared_patterns": [], "common_dependencies": []},
+    "shared_context": {"tech_stack": [], "conventions": []},
+    "artifacts": [
+      {
+        "type": "synthesis_specification",
+        "source": "brainstorm_synthesis",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+        "priority": "highest",
+        "usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "role_analysis",
+        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role-name]/analysis.md",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
+        "note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files may be included based on brainstorming results"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "topic_framework",
+        "source": "brainstorm_framework",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md",
+        "priority": "low",
+        "usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
+        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(ls .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_role_analysis_artifacts",
+        "action": "Load role-specific analysis documents for technical details",
+        "note": "These artifacts contain implementation details not in synthesis. Consult when needing: API schemas, caching configs, design tokens, ADRs, performance metrics.",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(find .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/ -name 'analysis.md' 2>/dev/null | head -8)",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md)",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md)",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "role_analysis_artifacts",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_planning_context",
+        "action": "Load plan-generated analysis",
+        "commands": [
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/context-package.json)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "planning_context"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
+        "action": "Explore codebase using MCP tools",
+        "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"[patterns]\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"[patterns]\")",
+        "output_to": "codebase_structure"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_task_patterns",
+        "action": "Analyze existing code patterns and identify modification targets",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cd \"[focus_paths]\")",
+          "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Identify modification targets TASK: Analyze '[title]' and locate specific files/functions/lines to modify CONTEXT: [synthesis_specification] [individual_artifacts] EXPECTED: Code locations in format 'file:function:lines' RULES: Prioritize synthesis-specification.md, identify exact modification points\")"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "task_context_with_targets",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+      "modification_points": [
+        "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
+        "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
+        "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
+        "Integrate with existing patterns"
+      ],
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load synthesis specification",
+        "Extract requirements and design",
+        "Analyze existing patterns",
+        "Implement following specification",
+        "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
+        "Validate against acceptance criteria"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": ["file:function:lines"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### Task Generation Process
+1. Parse analysis results and extract task definitions
+2. Detect brainstorming artifacts with priority scoring
+3. Generate task context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance)
+4. **Determine modification targets**: Extract specific code locations from analysis
+5. Build flow_control with artifact loading steps and target_files
+6. Create individual task JSON files in `.task/`
+
+#### Target Files Generation (Critical)
+**Purpose**: Identify specific code locations for modification AND new files to create
+
+**Source Data Priority**:
+1. **ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md** - Should contain identified code locations
+2. **Gemini/MCP Analysis** - From `analyze_task_patterns` step
+3. **Context Package** - File references from `focus_paths`
+
+**Format**: `["file:function:lines"]` or `["file"]` (for new files)
+- `file`: Relative path from project root (e.g., `src/auth/AuthService.ts`)
+- `function`: Function/method name to modify (e.g., `login`, `validateToken`) - **omit for new files**
+- `lines`: Approximate line range (e.g., `45-52`, `120-135`) - **omit for new files**
+
+**Examples**:
+```json
+"target_files": [
+  "src/auth/AuthService.ts:login:45-52",
+  "src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken:30-45",
+  "src/auth/PasswordReset.ts",
+  "tests/auth/PasswordReset.test.ts",
+  "tests/auth.test.ts:testLogin:15-20"
+]
+```
+
+**Generation Strategy**:
+- **New files to create** → Use `["path/to/NewFile.ts"]` (no function or lines)
+- **Existing files with specific locations** → Use `["file:function:lines"]`
+- **Existing files with function only** → Search lines using MCP/grep `["file:function:*"]`
+- **Existing files (explore entire)** → Mark as `["file.ts:*:*"]`
+- **No specific targets** → Leave empty `[]` (agent explores focus_paths)
+
+### Phase 3: Artifact Detection & Integration
+
+#### Artifact Priority
+1. **synthesis-specification.md** (highest) - Complete integrated spec
+2. **topic-framework.md** (medium) - Discussion framework
+3. **role/analysis.md** (low) - Individual perspectives
+
+#### Artifact-Task Mapping
+- **synthesis-specification.md** → All tasks
+- **ui-designer/analysis.md** → UI/Frontend tasks
+- **ux-expert/analysis.md** → UX/Interaction tasks
+- **system-architect/analysis.md** → Architecture/Backend tasks
+- **subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** → Domain/Standards tasks
+- **data-architect/analysis.md** → Data/API tasks
+- **scrum-master/analysis.md** → Sprint/Process tasks
+- **product-owner/analysis.md** → Backlog/Story tasks
+
+### Phase 4: IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+
+#### Document Structure
+```markdown
+---
+identifier: WFS-{session-id}
+source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
+analysis: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+artifacts: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/
+context_package: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
+workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design"  # Indicates execution model
+verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
+  concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
+  action_plan_verify: "pending"
+phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → analysis → concept_verify → planning"  # CCW workflow phases
+---
+
+# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
+
+## 1. Summary
+Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
+
+**Core Objectives**:
+- [Key objective 1]
+- [Key objective 2]
+
+**Technical Approach**:
+- [High-level approach]
+
+## 2. Context Analysis
+
+### CCW Workflow Context
+**Phase Progression**:
+- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (synthesis-specification.md generated)
+- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
+- ✅ Phase 3: Enhanced Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel insights)
+- ✅ Phase 4: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, synthesis updated | skipped)
+- ⏳ Phase 5: Action Planning (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md)
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (0 ambiguities remaining) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
+- action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
+
+**Context Package Summary**:
+- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
+- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
+- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
+- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {dependency count} dependencies identified
+
+### Project Profile
+- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
+- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
+- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
+- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
+
+### Module Structure
+```
+[Directory tree showing key modules]
+```
+
+### Dependencies
+**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
+**APIs**: [External services]
+**Development**: [Testing, linting, CI/CD tools]
+
+### Patterns & Conventions
+- **Architecture**: [Key patterns like DI, Event-Driven]
+- **Component Design**: [Design patterns]
+- **State Management**: [State strategy]
+- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
+
+## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
+
+### Artifact Usage Strategy
+**Primary Reference (synthesis-specification.md)**:
+- **What**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint from multi-role synthesis
+- **When**: Every task references this first for requirements and design decisions
+- **How**: Extract architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns, functional requirements, non-functional requirements
+- **Priority**: Authoritative - overrides role-specific analyses when conflicts arise
+- **CCW Value**: Consolidates insights from all brainstorming roles into single source of truth
+
+**Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
+- **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
+- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure
+- **Usage**: Tasks load this via `flow_control.preparatory_steps` for environment setup
+- **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
+
+**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
+- **What**: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel analysis results
+- **Content**: Optimization strategies, risk assessment, architecture review, implementation patterns
+- **Usage**: Referenced in task planning for technical guidance and risk mitigation
+- **CCW Value**: Multi-model parallel analysis providing comprehensive technical intelligence
+
+### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
+- **synthesis-specification.md**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
+  - Contains: Architecture design, UI/UX guidelines, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation roadmap, risk assessment
+
+### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
+- **topic-framework.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
+- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Detailed architecture specifications
+- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Layout and component specifications
+- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Product vision and user stories
+
+**Artifact Priority in Development**:
+1. synthesis-specification.md (primary reference for all tasks)
+2. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
+3. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis and optimization strategies)
+4. Role-specific analyses (fallback for detailed specifications)
+
+## 4. Implementation Strategy
+
+### Execution Strategy
+**Execution Model**: [Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles]
+
+**Rationale**: [Why this execution model fits the project]
+
+**Parallelization Opportunities**:
+- [List independent workstreams]
+
+**Serialization Requirements**:
+- [List critical dependencies]
+
+### Architectural Approach
+**Key Architecture Decisions**:
+- [ADR references from synthesis]
+- [Justification for architecture patterns]
+
+**Integration Strategy**:
+- [How modules communicate]
+- [State management approach]
+
+### Key Dependencies
+**Task Dependency Graph**:
+```
+[High-level dependency visualization]
+```
+
+**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
+
+### Testing Strategy
+**Testing Approach**:
+- Unit testing: [Tools, scope]
+- Integration testing: [Key integration points]
+- E2E testing: [Critical user flows]
+
+**Coverage Targets**:
+- Lines: ≥70%
+- Functions: ≥70%
+- Branches: ≥65%
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+- [CI/CD gates]
+- [Performance budgets]
+
+## 5. Task Breakdown Summary
+
+### Task Count
+**{N} tasks** (flat hierarchy | two-level hierarchy, sequential | parallel execution)
+
+### Task Structure
+- **IMPL-1**: [Main task title]
+- **IMPL-2**: [Main task title]
+...
+
+### Complexity Assessment
+- **High**: [List with rationale]
+- **Medium**: [List]
+- **Low**: [List]
+
+### Dependencies
+[Reference Section 4.3 for dependency graph]
+
+**Parallelization Opportunities**:
+- [Specific task groups that can run in parallel]
+
+## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
+
+### Execution Strategy
+
+**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): [Phase Name]**
+- **Tasks**: IMPL-1, IMPL-2
+- **Deliverables**:
+  - [Specific deliverable 1]
+  - [Specific deliverable 2]
+- **Success Criteria**:
+  - [Measurable criterion]
+
+**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): [Phase Name]**
+...
+
+### Resource Requirements
+
+**Development Team**:
+- [Team composition and skills]
+
+**External Dependencies**:
+- [Third-party services, APIs]
+
+**Infrastructure**:
+- [Development, staging, production environments]
+
+## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
+
+| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
+|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
+| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Strategy] | [Role] |
+
+**Critical Risks** (High impact + High probability):
+- [Risk 1]: [Detailed mitigation plan]
+
+**Monitoring Strategy**:
+- [How risks will be monitored]
+
+## 8. Success Criteria
+
+**Functional Completeness**:
+- [ ] All requirements from synthesis-specification.md implemented
+- [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
+
+**Technical Quality**:
+- [ ] Test coverage ≥70%
+- [ ] Bundle size within budget
+- [ ] Performance targets met
+
+**Operational Readiness**:
+- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
+- [ ] Monitoring and logging configured
+- [ ] Documentation complete
+
+**Business Metrics**:
+- [ ] [Key business metrics from synthesis]
+```
+
+### Phase 5: TODO_LIST.md Generation
+
+#### Document Structure
+```markdown
+# Tasks: [Session Topic]
+
+## Task Progress
+▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
+  - [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
+  - [x] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-001.2-summary.md)
+
+- [x] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-002-summary.md)
+
+## Status Legend
+- `▸` = Container task (has subtasks)
+- `- [ ]` = Pending leaf task
+- `- [x]` = Completed leaf task
+- Maximum 2 levels: Main tasks and subtasks only
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Session State Update
+1. Update workflow-session.json with task count and artifacts
+2. Validate all output files (task JSONs, IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md)
+3. Generate completion report
+
+## Output Files Structure
+```
+.workflow/{session-id}/
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                     # Implementation plan
+├── TODO_LIST.md                     # Progress tracking
+├── .task/
+│   ├── IMPL-1.json                  # Container task
+│   ├── IMPL-1.1.json                # Leaf task with flow_control
+│   └── IMPL-1.2.json                # Leaf task with flow_control
+├── .brainstorming/                  # Input artifacts
+│   ├── synthesis-specification.md
+│   ├── topic-framework.md
+│   └── {role}/analysis.md
+└── .process/
+    ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md          # Input from concept-enhanced
+    └── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Input Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Session not found | Invalid session ID | Verify session exists |
+| Analysis missing | Incomplete planning | Run concept-enhanced first |
+| Invalid format | Corrupted results | Regenerate analysis |
+
+### Task Generation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Count exceeds limit | >10 tasks | Re-scope requirements |
+| Invalid structure | Missing fields | Fix analysis results |
+| Dependency cycle | Circular refs | Adjust dependencies |
+
+### Artifact Integration Errors
+| Error | Cause | Recovery |
+|-------|-------|----------|
+| Artifact not found | Missing output | Continue without artifacts |
+| Invalid format | Corrupted file | Skip artifact loading |
+| Path invalid | Moved/deleted | Update references |
+
+## Integration & Usage
+
+### Command Chain
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:plan` (Phase 4)
+- **Calls**: None (terminal command)
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute`, `/workflow:status`
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates entire planning
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package
+- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides analysis results
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/tdd-coverage-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+---
+name: tdd-coverage-analysis
+description: Analyze test coverage and TDD cycle execution
+usage: /workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis --session <session_id>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis --session WFS-auth
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# TDD Coverage Analysis Command
+
+## Overview
+Analyze test coverage and verify Red-Green-Refactor cycle execution for TDD workflow validation.
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Extract test files from TEST tasks
+- Run test suite with coverage
+- Parse coverage metrics
+- Verify TDD cycle execution (Red -> Green -> Refactor)
+- Generate coverage and cycle reports
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Extract Test Tasks
+```bash
+find .workflow/{session_id}/.task/ -name 'TEST-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.focus_paths[]' {} \;
+```
+
+**Output**: List of test directories/files from all TEST tasks
+
+### Phase 2: Run Test Suite
+```bash
+# Node.js/JavaScript
+npm test -- --coverage --json > .workflow/{session_id}/.process/test-results.json
+
+# Python
+pytest --cov --json-report > .workflow/{session_id}/.process/test-results.json
+
+# Other frameworks (detect from project)
+[test_command] --coverage --json-output .workflow/{session_id}/.process/test-results.json
+```
+
+**Output**: test-results.json with coverage data
+
+### Phase 3: Parse Coverage Data
+```bash
+jq '.coverage' .workflow/{session_id}/.process/test-results.json > .workflow/{session_id}/.process/coverage-report.json
+```
+
+**Extract**:
+- Line coverage percentage
+- Branch coverage percentage
+- Function coverage percentage
+- Uncovered lines/branches
+
+### Phase 4: Verify TDD Cycle
+
+For each TDD chain (TEST-N.M -> IMPL-N.M -> REFACTOR-N.M):
+
+**1. Red Phase Verification**
+```bash
+# Check TEST task summary
+cat .workflow/{session_id}/.summaries/TEST-N.M-summary.md
+```
+
+Verify:
+- Tests were created
+- Tests failed initially
+- Failure messages were clear
+
+**2. Green Phase Verification**
+```bash
+# Check IMPL task summary
+cat .workflow/{session_id}/.summaries/IMPL-N.M-summary.md
+```
+
+Verify:
+- Implementation was completed
+- Tests now pass
+- Implementation was minimal
+
+**3. Refactor Phase Verification**
+```bash
+# Check REFACTOR task summary
+cat .workflow/{session_id}/.summaries/REFACTOR-N.M-summary.md
+```
+
+Verify:
+- Refactoring was completed
+- Tests still pass
+- Code quality improved
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Analysis Report
+
+Create `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md`:
+
+```markdown
+# TDD Cycle Analysis - {Session ID}
+
+## Coverage Metrics
+- **Line Coverage**: {percentage}%
+- **Branch Coverage**: {percentage}%
+- **Function Coverage**: {percentage}%
+
+## Coverage Details
+### Covered
+- {covered_lines} lines
+- {covered_branches} branches
+- {covered_functions} functions
+
+### Uncovered
+- Lines: {uncovered_line_numbers}
+- Branches: {uncovered_branch_locations}
+
+## TDD Cycle Verification
+
+### Feature 1: {Feature Name}
+**Chain**: TEST-1.1 -> IMPL-1.1 -> REFACTOR-1.1
+
+- [PASS] **Red Phase**: Tests created and failed initially
+- [PASS] **Green Phase**: Implementation made tests pass
+- [PASS] **Refactor Phase**: Refactoring maintained green tests
+
+### Feature 2: {Feature Name}
+**Chain**: TEST-2.1 -> IMPL-2.1 -> REFACTOR-2.1
+
+- [PASS] **Red Phase**: Tests created and failed initially
+- [WARN] **Green Phase**: Tests pass but implementation seems over-engineered
+- [PASS] **Refactor Phase**: Refactoring maintained green tests
+
+[Repeat for all features]
+
+## TDD Compliance Summary
+- **Total Chains**: {N}
+- **Complete Cycles**: {N}
+- **Incomplete Cycles**: {0}
+- **Compliance Score**: {score}/100
+
+## Gaps Identified
+- Feature 3: Missing initial test failure verification
+- Feature 5: No refactoring step completed
+
+## Recommendations
+- Complete missing refactoring steps
+- Add edge case tests for Feature 2
+- Verify test failure messages are descriptive
+```
+
+## Output Files
+```
+.workflow/{session-id}/
+└── .process/
+    ├── test-results.json         # Raw test execution results
+    ├── coverage-report.json      # Parsed coverage data
+    └── tdd-cycle-report.md       # TDD cycle analysis
+```
+
+## Test Framework Detection
+
+Auto-detect test framework from project:
+
+```bash
+# Check for test frameworks
+if [ -f "package.json" ] && grep -q "jest\|mocha\|vitest" package.json; then
+    TEST_CMD="npm test -- --coverage --json"
+elif [ -f "pytest.ini" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
+    TEST_CMD="pytest --cov --json-report"
+elif [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then
+    TEST_CMD="cargo test -- --test-threads=1 --nocapture"
+elif [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
+    TEST_CMD="go test -coverprofile=coverage.out -json ./..."
+else
+    TEST_CMD="echo 'No supported test framework found'"
+fi
+```
+
+## TDD Cycle Verification Algorithm
+
+```
+For each feature N:
+  1. Load TEST-N.M-summary.md
+     IF summary missing:
+       Mark: "Red phase incomplete"
+       SKIP to next feature
+
+     CHECK: Contains "test" AND "fail"
+     IF NOT found:
+       Mark: "Red phase verification failed"
+     ELSE:
+       Mark: "Red phase [PASS]"
+
+  2. Load IMPL-N.M-summary.md
+     IF summary missing:
+       Mark: "Green phase incomplete"
+       SKIP to next feature
+
+     CHECK: Contains "pass" OR "green"
+     IF NOT found:
+       Mark: "Green phase verification failed"
+     ELSE:
+       Mark: "Green phase [PASS]"
+
+  3. Load REFACTOR-N.M-summary.md
+     IF summary missing:
+       Mark: "Refactor phase incomplete"
+       CONTINUE (refactor is optional)
+
+     CHECK: Contains "refactor" AND "pass"
+     IF NOT found:
+       Mark: "Refactor phase verification failed"
+     ELSE:
+       Mark: "Refactor phase [PASS]"
+
+  4. Calculate chain score:
+     - Red + Green + Refactor all [PASS] = 100%
+     - Red + Green [PASS], Refactor missing = 80%
+     - Red [PASS], Green missing = 40%
+     - All missing = 0%
+```
+
+## Coverage Metrics Calculation
+
+```bash
+# Parse coverage from test-results.json
+line_coverage=$(jq '.coverage.lineCoverage' test-results.json)
+branch_coverage=$(jq '.coverage.branchCoverage' test-results.json)
+function_coverage=$(jq '.coverage.functionCoverage' test-results.json)
+
+# Calculate overall score
+overall_score=$(echo "($line_coverage + $branch_coverage + $function_coverage) / 3" | bc)
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Test Execution Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Test framework not found | No test config | Configure test framework first |
+| Tests fail to run | Syntax errors | Fix code before analysis |
+| Coverage not available | Missing coverage tool | Install coverage plugin |
+
+### Cycle Verification Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Summary missing | Task not executed | Execute tasks before analysis |
+| Invalid summary format | Corrupted file | Re-run task to regenerate |
+| No test evidence | Tests not committed | Ensure tests are committed |
+
+## Integration & Usage
+
+### Command Chain
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:tdd-verify` (Phase 3)
+- **Calls**: Test framework commands (npm test, pytest, etc.)
+- **Followed By**: Compliance report generation
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis --session WFS-auth
+```
+
+### Expected Output
+```
+TDD Coverage Analysis complete for session: WFS-auth
+
+## Coverage Results
+Line Coverage: 87%
+Branch Coverage: 82%
+Function Coverage: 91%
+
+## TDD Cycle Verification
+[PASS] Feature 1: Complete (Red -> Green -> Refactor)
+[PASS] Feature 2: Complete (Red -> Green -> Refactor)
+[WARN] Feature 3: Incomplete (Red -> Green, missing Refactor)
+
+Overall Compliance: 93/100
+
+Detailed report: .workflow/WFS-auth/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Uses this tool for verification
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` - Generates tasks this tool analyzes
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes tasks before analysis

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-concept-enhanced.md

@@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
+---
+name: test-concept-enhanced
+description: Analyze test requirements and generate test generation strategy using Gemini
+usage: /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session <test_session_id> --context <test_context_package_path>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id --context path/to/test-context-package.json"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session WFS-test-auth --context .workflow/WFS-test-auth/.process/test-context-package.json
+---
+
+# Test Concept Enhanced Command
+
+## Overview
+Specialized analysis tool for test generation workflows that uses Gemini to analyze test coverage gaps, implementation context, and generate comprehensive test generation strategies.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Coverage-Driven**: Focus on identified test gaps from context analysis
+- **Pattern-Based**: Learn from existing tests and project conventions
+- **Gemini-Powered**: Use Gemini for test requirement analysis and strategy design
+- **Single-Round Analysis**: Comprehensive test analysis in one execution
+- **No Code Generation**: Strategy and planning only, actual test generation happens in task execution
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Parse test-context-package.json from test-context-gather
+- Analyze implementation summaries and coverage gaps
+- Study existing test patterns and conventions
+- Generate test generation strategy using Gemini
+- Produce TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md for task generation
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Validation & Preparation
+
+1. **Session Validation**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Verify test session type is "test-gen"
+   - Extract source session reference
+
+2. **Context Package Validation**
+   - Read `test-context-package.json`
+   - Validate required sections: metadata, source_context, test_coverage, test_framework
+   - Extract coverage gaps and framework details
+
+3. **Strategy Determination**
+   - **Simple Test Generation** (1-3 files): Single Gemini analysis
+   - **Medium Test Generation** (4-6 files): Gemini comprehensive analysis
+   - **Complex Test Generation** (>6 files): Gemini analysis with modular approach
+
+### Phase 2: Gemini Test Analysis
+
+**Tool Configuration**:
+```bash
+cd .workflow/{test_session_id}/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze test coverage gaps and design comprehensive test generation strategy
+TASK: Study implementation context, existing tests, and generate test requirements for missing coverage
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json}
+
+**MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze test-context-package.json to understand:
+- Test coverage gaps from test_coverage.missing_tests[]
+- Implementation context from source_context.implementation_summaries[]
+- Existing test patterns from test_framework.conventions
+- Changed files requiring tests from source_context.implementation_summaries[].changed_files
+
+**ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+1. **Implementation Understanding**
+   - Load all implementation summaries from source session
+   - Understand implemented features, APIs, and business logic
+   - Extract key functions, classes, and modules
+   - Identify integration points and dependencies
+
+2. **Existing Test Pattern Analysis**
+   - Study existing test files for patterns and conventions
+   - Identify test structure (describe/it, test suites, fixtures)
+   - Analyze assertion patterns and mocking strategies
+   - Extract test setup/teardown patterns
+
+3. **Coverage Gap Assessment**
+   - For each file in missing_tests[], analyze:
+     - File purpose and functionality
+     - Public APIs requiring test coverage
+     - Critical paths and edge cases
+     - Integration points requiring tests
+   - Prioritize tests: high (core logic), medium (utilities), low (helpers)
+
+4. **Test Requirements Specification**
+   - For each missing test file, specify:
+     - **Test scope**: What needs to be tested
+     - **Test scenarios**: Happy path, error cases, edge cases, integration
+     - **Test data**: Required fixtures, mocks, test data
+     - **Dependencies**: External services, databases, APIs to mock
+     - **Coverage targets**: Functions/methods requiring tests
+
+5. **Test Generation Strategy**
+   - Determine test generation approach for each file
+   - Identify reusable test patterns from existing tests
+   - Plan test data and fixture requirements
+   - Define mocking strategy for dependencies
+   - Specify expected test file structure
+
+EXPECTED OUTPUT - Write to gemini-test-analysis.md:
+
+# Test Generation Analysis
+
+## 1. Implementation Context Summary
+- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
+- **Implemented Features**: {feature_summary}
+- **Changed Files**: {list_of_implementation_files}
+- **Tech Stack**: {technologies_used}
+
+## 2. Test Coverage Assessment
+- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
+- **Missing Tests**: {count} files
+- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
+- **Priority Breakdown**:
+  - High Priority: {count} files (core business logic)
+  - Medium Priority: {count} files (utilities, helpers)
+  - Low Priority: {count} files (configuration, constants)
+
+## 3. Existing Test Pattern Analysis
+- **Test Framework**: {framework_name_and_version}
+- **File Naming Convention**: {pattern}
+- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_or_other}
+- **Assertion Style**: {expect_assert_should}
+- **Mocking Strategy**: {mocking_framework_and_patterns}
+- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach_patterns}
+- **Test Data**: {fixtures_factories_builders}
+
+## 4. Test Requirements by File
+
+### File: {implementation_file_path}
+**Test File**: {suggested_test_file_path}
+**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
+
+#### Scope
+- {description_of_what_needs_testing}
+
+#### Test Scenarios
+1. **Happy Path Tests**
+   - {scenario_1}
+   - {scenario_2}
+
+2. **Error Handling Tests**
+   - {error_scenario_1}
+   - {error_scenario_2}
+
+3. **Edge Case Tests**
+   - {edge_case_1}
+   - {edge_case_2}
+
+4. **Integration Tests** (if applicable)
+   - {integration_scenario_1}
+   - {integration_scenario_2}
+
+#### Test Data & Fixtures
+- {required_test_data}
+- {required_mocks}
+- {required_fixtures}
+
+#### Dependencies to Mock
+- {external_service_1}
+- {external_service_2}
+
+#### Coverage Targets
+- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
+- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
+
+---
+[Repeat for each missing test file]
+---
+
+## 5. Test Generation Strategy
+
+### Overall Approach
+- {strategy_description}
+
+### Test Generation Order
+1. {file_1} - {rationale}
+2. {file_2} - {rationale}
+3. {file_3} - {rationale}
+
+### Reusable Patterns
+- {pattern_1_from_existing_tests}
+- {pattern_2_from_existing_tests}
+
+### Test Data Strategy
+- {approach_to_test_data_and_fixtures}
+
+### Mocking Strategy
+- {approach_to_mocking_dependencies}
+
+### Quality Criteria
+- Code coverage target: {percentage}%
+- Test scenarios per function: {count}
+- Integration test coverage: {approach}
+
+## 6. Implementation Targets
+
+**Purpose**: Identify new test files to create
+
+**Format**: New test files only (no existing files to modify)
+
+**Test Files to Create**:
+1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
+   - **Type**: Create new test file
+   - **Purpose**: Test TokenValidator class
+   - **Scenarios**: 15 test cases covering validation logic, error handling, edge cases
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, test fixtures for tokens
+
+2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
+   - **Type**: Create new test file
+   - **Purpose**: Test error handling middleware
+   - **Scenarios**: 8 test cases for different error types and response formats
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock Express req/res/next, error fixtures
+
+[List all test files to create]
+
+## 7. Success Metrics
+- **Test Coverage Goal**: {target_percentage}%
+- **Test Quality**: All scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
+- **Convention Compliance**: Follow existing test patterns
+- **Maintainability**: Clear test descriptions, reusable fixtures
+
+RULES:
+- Focus on TEST REQUIREMENTS and GENERATION STRATEGY, NOT code generation
+- Study existing test patterns thoroughly for consistency
+- Prioritize critical business logic tests
+- Specify clear test scenarios and coverage targets
+- Identify all dependencies requiring mocks
+- **MUST write output to .workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md**
+- Do NOT generate actual test code or implementation
+- Output ONLY test analysis and generation strategy
+" --approval-mode yolo
+```
+
+**Output Location**: `.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md`
+
+### Phase 3: Results Synthesis
+
+1. **Output Validation**
+   - Verify `gemini-test-analysis.md` exists and is complete
+   - Validate all required sections present
+   - Check test requirements are actionable
+
+2. **Quality Assessment**
+   - Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
+   - Dependencies and mocks clearly identified
+   - Test generation strategy is practical
+   - Coverage targets are reasonable
+
+### Phase 4: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Generation
+
+Synthesize Gemini analysis into standardized format:
+
+```markdown
+# Test Generation Analysis Results
+
+## Executive Summary
+- **Test Session**: {test_session_id}
+- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
+- **Analysis Timestamp**: {timestamp}
+- **Coverage Gap**: {missing_test_count} files require tests
+- **Test Framework**: {framework}
+- **Overall Strategy**: {high_level_approach}
+
+---
+
+## 1. Coverage Assessment
+
+### Current Coverage
+- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
+- **Implementation Files**: {count} files
+- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
+
+### Missing Tests (Priority Order)
+1. **High Priority** ({count} files)
+   - {file_1} - {reason}
+   - {file_2} - {reason}
+
+2. **Medium Priority** ({count} files)
+   - {file_1} - {reason}
+
+3. **Low Priority** ({count} files)
+   - {file_1} - {reason}
+
+---
+
+## 2. Test Framework & Conventions
+
+### Framework Configuration
+- **Framework**: {framework_name}
+- **Version**: {version}
+- **Test Pattern**: {file_pattern}
+- **Test Directory**: {directory_structure}
+
+### Conventions
+- **File Naming**: {convention}
+- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_blocks}
+- **Assertions**: {assertion_library}
+- **Mocking**: {mocking_framework}
+- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach}
+
+### Example Pattern (from existing tests)
+```
+{example_test_structure_from_analysis}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 3. Test Requirements by File
+
+[For each missing test, include:]
+
+### Test File: {test_file_path}
+**Implementation**: {implementation_file}
+**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
+**Estimated Test Count**: {count}
+
+#### Test Scenarios
+1. **Happy Path**: {scenarios}
+2. **Error Handling**: {scenarios}
+3. **Edge Cases**: {scenarios}
+4. **Integration**: {scenarios}
+
+#### Dependencies & Mocks
+- {dependency_1_to_mock}
+- {dependency_2_to_mock}
+
+#### Test Data Requirements
+- {fixture_1}
+- {fixture_2}
+
+---
+
+## 4. Test Generation Strategy
+
+### Generation Approach
+{overall_strategy_description}
+
+### Generation Order
+1. {test_file_1} - {rationale}
+2. {test_file_2} - {rationale}
+3. {test_file_3} - {rationale}
+
+### Reusable Components
+- **Test Fixtures**: {common_fixtures}
+- **Mock Patterns**: {common_mocks}
+- **Helper Functions**: {test_helpers}
+
+### Quality Targets
+- **Coverage Goal**: {percentage}%
+- **Scenarios per Function**: {min_count}
+- **Integration Coverage**: {approach}
+
+---
+
+## 5. Implementation Targets
+
+**Purpose**: New test files to create (code-developer will generate these)
+
+**Test Files to Create**:
+
+1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
+   - **Implementation Source**: `src/auth/TokenValidator.ts`
+   - **Test Scenarios**: 15 (validation, error handling, edge cases)
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, token fixtures
+   - **Priority**: High
+
+2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
+   - **Implementation Source**: `src/middleware/errorHandler.ts`
+   - **Test Scenarios**: 8 (error types, response formats)
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock Express, error fixtures
+   - **Priority**: High
+
+[List all test files with full specifications]
+
+---
+
+## 6. Success Criteria
+
+### Coverage Metrics
+- Achieve {target_percentage}% code coverage
+- All public APIs have tests
+- Critical paths fully covered
+
+### Quality Standards
+- All test scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
+- Follow existing test conventions
+- Clear test descriptions and assertions
+- Maintainable test structure
+
+### Validation Approach
+- Run full test suite after generation
+- Verify coverage with coverage tool
+- Manual review of test quality
+- Integration test validation
+
+---
+
+## 7. Reference Information
+
+### Source Context
+- **Implementation Summaries**: {paths}
+- **Existing Tests**: {example_tests}
+- **Documentation**: {relevant_docs}
+
+### Analysis Tools
+- **Gemini Analysis**: gemini-test-analysis.md
+- **Coverage Tools**: {coverage_tool_if_detected}
+```
+
+**Output Location**: `.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing context package | test-context-gather not run | Run test-context-gather first |
+| No coverage gaps | All files have tests | Skip test generation, proceed to test execution |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to configure test framework |
+| Invalid source session | Source session incomplete | Complete implementation first |
+
+### Gemini Execution Errors
+| Error | Cause | Recovery |
+|-------|-------|----------|
+| Timeout | Large project analysis | Reduce scope, analyze by module |
+| Output incomplete | Token limit exceeded | Retry with focused analysis |
+| No output file | Write permission error | Check directory permissions |
+
+### Fallback Strategy
+- If Gemini fails, generate basic TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from context package
+- Use coverage gaps and framework info to create minimal requirements
+- Provide guidance for manual test planning
+
+## Performance Optimization
+
+- **Focused Analysis**: Only analyze files with missing tests
+- **Pattern Reuse**: Study existing tests for quick pattern extraction
+- **Parallel Operations**: Load implementation summaries in parallel
+- **Timeout Management**: 20-minute limit for Gemini analysis
+
+## Integration
+
+### Called By
+- `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4: Analysis)
+
+### Requires
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` output (test-context-package.json)
+
+### Followed By
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Generates test task JSON with code-developer invocation
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Valid TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated
+- ✅ All missing tests documented with requirements
+- ✅ Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
+- ✅ Dependencies and mocks identified
+- ✅ Test generation strategy is actionable
+- ✅ Execution time < 20 minutes
+- ✅ Output follows existing test conventions
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Provides input context
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Consumes analysis results
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Main test generation workflow

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-context-gather.md

@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+---
+name: test-context-gather
+description: Collect test coverage context and identify files requiring test generation
+usage: /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session <test_session_id>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-payment
+---
+
+# Test Context Gather Command
+
+## Overview
+Specialized context collector for test generation workflows that analyzes test coverage, identifies missing tests, and packages implementation context from source sessions.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Coverage-First**: Analyze existing test coverage before planning
+- **Gap Identification**: Locate implementation files without corresponding tests
+- **Source Context Loading**: Import implementation summaries from source session
+- **Framework Detection**: Auto-detect test framework and patterns
+- **MCP-Powered**: Leverage code-index tools for precise analysis
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Load source session implementation context
+- Analyze current test coverage using MCP tools
+- Identify files requiring test generation
+- Detect test framework and conventions
+- Package test context for analysis phase
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Loading
+
+1. **Test Session Validation**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Extract `meta.source_session` reference
+   - Validate test session type is "test-gen"
+
+2. **Source Session Context Loading**
+   - Read `.workflow/{source_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Load implementation summaries from `.workflow/{source_session_id}/.summaries/`
+   - Extract changed files and implementation scope
+   - Identify implementation patterns and tech stack
+
+### Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis (MCP Tools)
+
+1. **Existing Test Discovery**
+   ```bash
+   # Find all test files
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.spec.*")
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*test_*.py")
+
+   # Search for test patterns
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="describe|it|test|@Test",
+     file_pattern="*.test.*",
+     context_lines=0
+   )
+   ```
+
+2. **Coverage Gap Analysis**
+   ```bash
+   # For each implementation file from source session
+   # Check if corresponding test file exists
+
+   # Example: src/auth/AuthService.ts -> tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts
+   #          src/utils/validator.py -> tests/test_validator.py
+
+   # Output: List of files without tests
+   ```
+
+3. **Test Statistics**
+   - Count total test files
+   - Count implementation files from source session
+   - Calculate coverage percentage
+   - Identify coverage gaps by module
+
+### Phase 3: Test Framework Detection
+
+1. **Framework Identification**
+   ```bash
+   # Check package.json or requirements.txt
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="jest|mocha|jasmine|pytest|unittest|rspec",
+     file_pattern="package.json|requirements.txt|Gemfile",
+     context_lines=2
+   )
+
+   # Analyze existing test patterns
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="describe\\(|it\\(|test\\(|def test_",
+     file_pattern="*.test.*",
+     context_lines=3
+   )
+   ```
+
+2. **Convention Analysis**
+   - Test file naming patterns (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts)
+   - Test directory structure (tests/ vs __tests__ vs src/**/*.test.*)
+   - Assertion library (expect, assert, should)
+   - Mocking framework (jest.fn, sinon, unittest.mock)
+
+### Phase 4: Context Packaging
+
+Generate `test-context-package.json`:
+
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "test_session_id": "WFS-test-auth",
+    "source_session_id": "WFS-auth",
+    "timestamp": "2025-10-04T10:30:00Z",
+    "task_type": "test-generation",
+    "complexity": "medium"
+  },
+  "source_context": {
+    "implementation_summaries": [
+      {
+        "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+        "summary_path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+        "changed_files": [
+          "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
+          "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+          "src/middleware/auth.ts"
+        ],
+        "implementation_type": "feature"
+      }
+    ],
+    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "express", "jsonwebtoken"],
+    "project_patterns": {
+      "architecture": "layered",
+      "error_handling": "try-catch with custom errors",
+      "async_pattern": "async/await"
+    }
+  },
+  "test_coverage": {
+    "existing_tests": [
+      "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
+      "tests/middleware/auth.test.ts"
+    ],
+    "missing_tests": [
+      {
+        "implementation_file": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+        "suggested_test_file": "tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "reason": "New implementation without tests"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_stats": {
+      "total_implementation_files": 3,
+      "files_with_tests": 2,
+      "files_without_tests": 1,
+      "coverage_percentage": 66.7
+    }
+  },
+  "test_framework": {
+    "framework": "jest",
+    "version": "^29.0.0",
+    "test_pattern": "**/*.test.ts",
+    "test_directory": "tests/",
+    "assertion_library": "expect",
+    "mocking_framework": "jest",
+    "conventions": {
+      "file_naming": "*.test.ts",
+      "test_structure": "describe/it blocks",
+      "setup_teardown": "beforeEach/afterEach"
+    }
+  },
+  "assets": [
+    {
+      "type": "implementation_summary",
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+      "relevance": "Source implementation context",
+      "priority": "highest"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "existing_test",
+      "path": "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
+      "relevance": "Test pattern reference",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "source_code",
+      "path": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+      "relevance": "Implementation requiring tests",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "documentation",
+      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+      "relevance": "Project conventions",
+      "priority": "medium"
+    }
+  ],
+  "focus_areas": [
+    "Generate comprehensive tests for TokenValidator",
+    "Follow existing Jest patterns from AuthService tests",
+    "Cover happy path, error cases, and edge cases",
+    "Include integration tests for middleware"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Output Location
+
+```
+.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json
+```
+
+## MCP Tools Usage
+
+### File Discovery
+```bash
+# Test files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.spec.*")
+
+# Implementation files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.js")
+```
+
+### Content Search
+```bash
+# Test framework detection
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="jest|mocha|pytest",
+  file_pattern="package.json|requirements.txt"
+)
+
+# Test pattern analysis
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="describe|it|test",
+  file_pattern="*.test.*",
+  context_lines=2
+)
+```
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+```bash
+# For each implementation file
+# Check if test exists
+implementation_file="src/auth/AuthService.ts"
+test_file_patterns=(
+  "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts"
+  "src/auth/AuthService.test.ts"
+  "src/auth/__tests__/AuthService.test.ts"
+)
+
+# Search for test file
+for pattern in "${test_file_patterns[@]}"; do
+  if mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="$pattern") | grep -q .; then
+    echo "✅ Test exists: $pattern"
+    break
+  fi
+done
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Source session not found | Invalid source_session reference | Verify test session metadata |
+| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Complete source session first |
+| MCP tools unavailable | MCP not configured | Fallback to bash find/grep |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to specify framework |
+
+## Fallback Strategy (No MCP)
+
+```bash
+# File discovery
+find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | grep -v node_modules
+
+# Framework detection
+grep -r "jest\|mocha\|pytest" package.json requirements.txt 2>/dev/null
+
+# Coverage analysis
+for impl_file in $(cat changed_files.txt); do
+  test_file=$(echo $impl_file | sed 's/src/tests/' | sed 's/\(.*\)\.\(ts\|js\|py\)$/\1.test.\2/')
+  [ ! -f "$test_file" ] && echo "$impl_file → MISSING TEST"
+done
+```
+
+## Integration
+
+### Called By
+- `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 3: Context Gathering)
+
+### Calls
+- MCP code-index tools for analysis
+- Bash file operations for fallback
+
+### Followed By
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Analyzes context and plans test generation
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Source session context loaded successfully
+- ✅ Test coverage gaps identified with MCP tools
+- ✅ Test framework detected and documented
+- ✅ Valid test-context-package.json generated
+- ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
+- ✅ Execution time < 20 seconds
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Main test generation workflow
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Test task JSON generation

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,655 @@
+---
+name: test-task-generate
+description: Generate test-fix task JSON with iterative test-fix-retest cycle specification
+usage: /workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session <test-session-id>
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] --session WFS-test-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+---
+
+# Test Task Generation Command
+
+## Overview
+Generate specialized test-fix task JSON with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle specification, including Gemini diagnosis (using bug-fix template) and manual fix workflow (Codex automation only when explicitly requested).
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Analysis-Driven Test Generation**: Use TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
+- **Agent-Based Test Creation**: Call @code-developer agent for comprehensive test generation
+- **Coverage-First**: Generate all missing tests before execution
+- **Test Execution**: Execute complete test suite after generation
+- **Gemini Diagnosis**: Use Gemini for root cause analysis and fix suggestions (references bug-fix template)
+- **Manual Fixes First**: Apply fixes manually by default, codex only when explicitly needed
+- **Iterative Refinement**: Repeat test-analyze-fix-retest cycle until all tests pass
+- **Surgical Fixes**: Minimal code changes, no refactoring during test fixes
+- **Auto-Revert**: Rollback all changes if max iterations reached
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
+- Extract test requirements and generation strategy
+- Parse `--use-codex` flag to determine fix mode (manual vs automated)
+- Generate test generation subtask calling @code-developer
+- Generate test execution and fix cycle task JSON with appropriate fix mode
+- Configure Gemini diagnosis workflow (bug-fix template) and manual/Codex fix application
+- Create test-oriented IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md with test generation phase
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
+
+1. **Parameter Parsing**
+   - Parse `--use-codex` flag from command arguments
+   - Store flag value for IMPL-002.json generation
+
+2. **Test Session Validation**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Verify `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+   - Extract `source_session_id` from metadata
+
+3. **Test Analysis Results Loading**
+   - **REQUIRED**: Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+   - Parse test requirements by file
+   - Extract test generation strategy
+   - Identify test files to create with specifications
+
+4. **Test Context Package Loading**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json`
+   - Extract test framework configuration
+   - Extract coverage gaps and priorities
+   - Load source session implementation summaries
+
+### Phase 2: Task JSON Generation
+
+Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
+1. **IMPL-001.json** - Test Generation (calls @code-developer)
+2. **IMPL-002.json** - Test Execution and Fix Cycle (calls @test-fix-agent)
+
+#### IMPL-001.json - Test Generation Task
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Generate comprehensive tests for [sourceSessionId]",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-gen",
+    "agent": "@code-developer",
+    "source_session": "[sourceSessionId]",
+    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|cargo|detected"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Generate comprehensive test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+      "Follow existing test patterns and conventions from test framework",
+      "Create tests for all missing coverage identified in analysis",
+      "Include happy path, error handling, edge cases, and integration tests",
+      "Use test data and mocks as specified in analysis",
+      "Ensure tests follow project coding standards"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": [
+      "tests/**/*",
+      "src/**/*.test.*",
+      "{paths_from_analysis}"
+    ],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "All test files from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5 are created",
+      "Tests follow existing test patterns and conventions",
+      "Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases, integration",
+      "All dependencies are properly mocked",
+      "Test files are syntactically valid and can be executed",
+      "Test coverage meets analysis requirements"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": [],
+    "source_context": {
+      "session_id": "[sourceSessionId]",
+      "test_analysis": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+      "test_context": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json",
+      "implementation_summaries": [
+        ".workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_test_analysis",
+        "action": "Load test generation requirements and strategy",
+        "commands": [
+          "Read(.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)",
+          "Read(.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "test_generation_requirements",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_implementation_context",
+        "action": "Load source implementation for test generation context",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(for f in .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md; do echo \"=== $(basename $f) ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "implementation_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_test_patterns",
+        "action": "Study existing tests for pattern reference",
+        "commands": [
+          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
+          "bash(# Read first 2 existing test files as examples)",
+          "bash(test_files=$(mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\") | head -2))",
+          "bash(for f in $test_files; do echo \"=== $f ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "existing_test_patterns",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md. Follow test generation strategy and create all test files listed in section 5 (Implementation Targets).",
+      "generation_steps": [
+        "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 3 (Test Requirements by File)",
+        "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 4 (Test Generation Strategy)",
+        "Study existing test patterns from test_context.test_framework.conventions",
+        "For each test file in section 5 (Implementation Targets):",
+        "  - Create test file with specified scenarios",
+        "  - Implement happy path tests",
+        "  - Implement error handling tests",
+        "  - Implement edge case tests",
+        "  - Implement integration tests (if specified)",
+        "  - Add required mocks and fixtures",
+        "Follow test framework conventions and project standards",
+        "Ensure all tests are executable and syntactically valid"
+      ],
+      "quality_criteria": [
+        "All test scenarios from analysis are implemented",
+        "Test structure matches existing patterns",
+        "Clear test descriptions and assertions",
+        "Proper setup/teardown and fixtures",
+        "Dependencies properly mocked",
+        "Tests follow project coding standards"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      "{test_file_1 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
+      "{test_file_2 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
+      "{test_file_N from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### IMPL-002.json - Test Execution & Fix Cycle Task
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-002",
+  "title": "Execute and fix tests for [sourceSessionId]",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-fix",
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "source_session": "[sourceSessionId]",
+    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|cargo|detected",
+    "max_iterations": 5,
+    "use_codex": false  // Set to true if --use-codex flag present
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Execute complete test suite (generated in IMPL-001)",
+      "Diagnose test failures using Gemini analysis with bug-fix template",
+      "Present fixes to user for manual application (default)",
+      "Use Codex ONLY if user explicitly requests automation",
+      "Iterate until all tests pass or max iterations reached",
+      "Revert changes if unable to fix within iteration limit"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": [
+      "tests/**/*",
+      "src/**/*.test.*",
+      "{implementation_files_from_source_session}"
+    ],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "All tests pass successfully (100% pass rate)",
+      "No test failures or errors in final run",
+      "Code changes are minimal and surgical",
+      "All fixes are verified through retest",
+      "Iteration logs document fix progression"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001"],
+    "source_context": {
+      "session_id": "[sourceSessionId]",
+      "test_generation_summary": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+      "implementation_summaries": [
+        ".workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_source_session_summaries",
+        "action": "Load implementation context from source session",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(find .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/ -name 'IMPL-*-summary.md' 2>/dev/null)",
+          "bash(for f in .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md; do echo \"=== $(basename $f) ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "implementation_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "discover_test_framework",
+        "action": "Identify test framework and test command",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(jq -r '.scripts.test // \"npm test\"' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo 'pytest' || echo 'cargo test')",
+          "bash([ -f 'package.json' ] && echo 'jest/npm' || [ -f 'pytest.ini' ] && echo 'pytest' || [ -f 'Cargo.toml' ] && echo 'cargo' || echo 'unknown')"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "test_command",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_test_coverage",
+        "action": "Analyze test coverage and identify missing tests",
+        "commands": [
+          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
+          "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"test|describe|it|def test_\", file_pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
+          "bash(# Count implementation files vs test files)",
+          "bash(impl_count=$(find [changed_files_dirs] -type f \\( -name '*.ts' -o -name '*.js' -o -name '*.py' \\) ! -name '*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | wc -l))",
+          "bash(test_count=$(mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\") | wc -l))",
+          "bash(echo \"Implementation files: $impl_count, Test files: $test_count\")"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "test_coverage_analysis",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "identify_files_without_tests",
+        "action": "List implementation files that lack corresponding test files",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(# For each changed file from source session, check if test exists)",
+          "bash(for file in [changed_files]; do test_file=$(echo $file | sed 's/\\(.*\\)\\.\\(ts\\|js\\|py\\)$/\\1.test.\\2/'); [ ! -f \"$test_file\" ] && echo \"$file\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "files_without_tests",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "prepare_test_environment",
+        "action": "Ensure test environment is ready",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash([ -f 'package.json' ] && npm install 2>/dev/null || true)",
+          "bash([ -f 'requirements.txt' ] && pip install -q -r requirements.txt 2>/dev/null || true)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "environment_status",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle using Gemini diagnosis (bug-fix template) and manual fixes (Codex only if explicitly needed)",
+      "test_fix_cycle": {
+        "max_iterations": 5,
+        "cycle_pattern": "test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if needed) → retest",
+        "tools": {
+          "test_execution": "bash(test_command)",
+          "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
+          "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex exec resume --last (if explicitly needed)",
+          "verification": "bash(test_command) + regression_check"
+        },
+        "exit_conditions": {
+          "success": "all_tests_pass",
+          "failure": "max_iterations_reached",
+          "error": "test_command_not_found"
+        }
+      },
+      "modification_points": [
+        "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
+        "  1.1. Discover test command from framework detection",
+        "  1.2. Execute initial test run: bash([test_command])",
+        "  1.3. Parse test output and count failures",
+        "  1.4. If all pass → Skip to PHASE 3 (success)",
+        "  1.5. If failures → Store failure output, proceed to PHASE 2",
+        "",
+        "PHASE 2: Iterative Test-Fix-Retest Cycle (max 5 iterations)",
+        "  Note: This phase handles test failures, NOT test generation failures",
+        "  Initialize: max_iterations=5, current_iteration=0",
+        "  ",
+        "  WHILE (tests failing AND current_iteration < max_iterations):",
+        "    current_iteration++",
+        "    ",
+        "    STEP 2.1: Gemini Diagnosis (using bug-fix template)",
+        "    - Prepare diagnosis context:",
+        "      * Test failure output from previous run",
+        "      * Source files from focus_paths",
+        "      * Implementation summaries from source session",
+        "    - Execute Gemini analysis with bug-fix template:",
+        "      bash(cd .workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p \"",
+        "      PURPOSE: Diagnose test failure iteration [N] and propose minimal fix",
+        "      TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations for test failure",
+        "      MODE: analysis",
+        "      CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}",
+        "               Test output: [test_failures]",
+        "               Source files: [focus_paths]",
+        "               Implementation: [implementation_context]",
+        "      EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes",
+        "      RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [test_failure_description]",
+        "             Minimal surgical fixes only - no refactoring",
+        "      \" > fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md)",
+        "    - Parse diagnosis → extract fix_suggestion and target_files",
+        "    - Present fix to user for manual application (default)",
+        "    ",
+        "    STEP 2.2: Apply Fix (Based on meta.use_codex Flag)",
+        "    ",
+        "    IF meta.use_codex = false (DEFAULT):",
+        "    - Present Gemini diagnosis to user for manual fix",
+        "    - User applies fix based on diagnosis recommendations",
+        "    - Stage changes: bash(git add -A)",
+        "    - Store fix log: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-changes.log",
+        "    ",
+        "    IF meta.use_codex = true (--use-codex flag present):",
+        "    - Stage current changes (if valid git repo): bash(git add -A)",
+        "    - First iteration: Start new Codex session",
+        "      codex -C [project_root] --full-auto exec \"",
+        "      PURPOSE: Fix test failure iteration 1",
+        "      TASK: [fix_suggestion from Gemini]",
+        "      MODE: write",
+        "      CONTEXT: Diagnosis: .workflow/.process/fix-iteration-1-diagnosis.md",
+        "               Target files: [target_files]",
+        "               Implementation context: [implementation_context]",
+        "      EXPECTED: Minimal code changes to resolve test failure",
+        "      RULES: Apply ONLY suggested changes, no refactoring",
+        "             Preserve existing code style",
+        "      \" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access",
+        "    - Subsequent iterations: Resume session for context continuity",
+        "      codex exec \"",
+        "      CONTINUE TO NEXT FIX:",
+        "      Iteration [N] of 5: Fix test failure",
+        "      ",
+        "      PURPOSE: Fix remaining test failures",
+        "      TASK: [fix_suggestion from Gemini iteration N]",
+        "      CONTEXT: Previous fixes applied, diagnosis: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md",
+        "      EXPECTED: Surgical fix for current failure",
+        "      RULES: Build on previous fixes, maintain consistency",
+        "      \" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access",
+        "    - Store fix log: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-changes.log",
+        "    ",
+        "    STEP 2.3: Retest and Verification",
+        "    - Re-execute test suite: bash([test_command])",
+        "    - Capture output: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-retest.log",
+        "    - Count failures: bash(grep -c 'FAIL\\|ERROR' .process/fix-iteration-[N]-retest.log)",
+        "    - Check for regression:",
+        "      IF new_failures > previous_failures:",
+        "        WARN: Regression detected",
+        "        Include in next Gemini diagnosis context",
+        "    - Analyze results:",
+        "      IF all_tests_pass:",
+        "        BREAK loop → Proceed to PHASE 3",
+        "      ELSE:",
+        "        Update test_failures context",
+        "        CONTINUE loop",
+        "  ",
+        "  IF max_iterations reached AND tests still failing:",
+        "    EXECUTE: git reset --hard HEAD (revert all changes)",
+        "    MARK: Task status = blocked",
+        "    GENERATE: Detailed failure report with iteration logs",
+        "    EXIT: Require manual intervention",
+        "",
+        "PHASE 3: Final Validation and Certification",
+        "  3.1. Execute final confirmation test run",
+        "  3.2. Generate success summary:",
+        "       - Iterations required: [current_iteration]",
+        "       - Fixes applied: [summary from iteration logs]",
+        "       - Test results: All passing ✅",
+        "  3.3. Mark task status: completed",
+        "  3.4. Update TODO_LIST.md: Mark as ✅",
+        "  3.5. Certify code: APPROVED for deployment"
+      ],
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load source session implementation context",
+        "Discover test framework and command",
+        "PHASE 0: Test Coverage Check",
+        "  Analyze existing test files",
+        "  Identify files without tests",
+        "  IF tests missing:",
+        "    Report to user (no automatic generation)",
+        "    Wait for user to generate tests or request automation",
+        "  ELSE:",
+        "    Skip to Phase 1",
+        "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
+        "  Execute test suite",
+        "  IF all pass → Success (Phase 3)",
+        "  ELSE → Store failures, proceed to Phase 2",
+        "PHASE 2: Iterative Fix Cycle (max 5 iterations)",
+        "  LOOP (max 5 times):",
+        "    1. Gemini diagnoses failure with bug-fix template → fix suggestion",
+        "    2. Check meta.use_codex flag:",
+        "       - IF false (default): Present fix to user for manual application",
+        "       - IF true (--use-codex): Codex applies fix with resume for continuity",
+        "    3. Retest and check results",
+        "    4. IF pass → Exit loop to Phase 3",
+        "    5. ELSE → Continue with updated context",
+        "  IF max iterations → Revert + report failure",
+        "PHASE 3: Final Validation",
+        "  Confirm all tests pass",
+        "  Generate summary (include test generation info)",
+        "  Certify code APPROVED"
+      ],
+      "error_handling": {
+        "max_iterations_reached": {
+          "action": "revert_all_changes",
+          "commands": [
+            "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
+            "bash(jq '.status = \"blocked\"' .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json > temp.json && mv temp.json .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json)"
+          ],
+          "report": "Generate failure report with iteration logs in .summaries/IMPL-001-failure-report.md"
+        },
+        "test_command_fails": {
+          "action": "treat_as_test_failure",
+          "context": "Use stderr as failure context for Gemini diagnosis"
+        },
+        "codex_apply_fails": {
+          "action": "retry_once_then_skip",
+          "fallback": "Mark iteration as skipped, continue to next"
+        },
+        "gemini_diagnosis_fails": {
+          "action": "retry_with_simplified_context",
+          "fallback": "Use previous diagnosis, continue"
+        },
+        "regression_detected": {
+          "action": "log_warning_continue",
+          "context": "Include regression info in next Gemini diagnosis"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      "Auto-discovered from test failures",
+      "Extracted from Gemini diagnosis each iteration",
+      "Format: file:function:lines or file (for new files)"
+    ],
+    "codex_session": {
+      "strategy": "resume_for_continuity",
+      "first_iteration": "codex exec \"fix iteration 1\" --full-auto",
+      "subsequent_iterations": "codex exec \"fix iteration N\" resume --last",
+      "benefits": [
+        "Maintains conversation context across fixes",
+        "Remembers previous decisions and patterns",
+        "Ensures consistency in fix approach",
+        "Reduces redundant context injection"
+      ]
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+
+#### Document Structure
+```markdown
+---
+identifier: WFS-test-[session-id]
+source_session: WFS-[source-session-id]
+workflow_type: test_session
+test_framework: jest|pytest|cargo|detected
+---
+
+# Test Validation Plan: [Source Session Topic]
+
+## Summary
+Execute comprehensive test suite for implementation from session WFS-[source-session-id].
+Diagnose and fix all test failures using iterative Gemini analysis and Codex execution.
+
+## Source Session Context
+- **Implementation Session**: WFS-[source-session-id]
+- **Completed Tasks**: IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...
+- **Changed Files**: [list from git log]
+- **Implementation Summaries**: [references to source session summaries]
+
+## Test Framework
+- **Detected Framework**: jest|pytest|cargo|other
+- **Test Command**: npm test|pytest|cargo test
+- **Test Files**: [discovered test files]
+- **Coverage**: [estimated test coverage]
+
+## Test-Fix-Retest Cycle
+- **Max Iterations**: 5
+- **Diagnosis Tool**: Gemini (analysis mode with bug-fix template from bug-index.md)
+- **Fix Tool**: Manual (default, meta.use_codex=false) or Codex (if --use-codex flag, meta.use_codex=true)
+- **Verification**: Bash test execution + regression check
+
+### Cycle Workflow
+1. **Initial Test**: Execute full suite, capture failures
+2. **Iterative Fix Loop** (max 5 times):
+   - Gemini diagnoses failure using bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestion
+   - Check meta.use_codex flag:
+     - If false (default): Present fix to user for manual application
+     - If true (--use-codex): Codex applies fix with resume for context continuity
+   - Retest and verify (check for regressions)
+   - Continue until all pass or max iterations reached
+3. **Final Validation**: Confirm all tests pass, certify code
+
+### Error Recovery
+- **Max iterations reached**: Revert all changes, report failure
+- **Test command fails**: Treat as test failure, diagnose with Gemini
+- **Codex fails**: Retry once, skip iteration if still failing
+- **Regression detected**: Log warning, include in next diagnosis
+
+## Task Breakdown
+- **IMPL-001**: Execute and validate tests with iterative fix cycle
+
+## Implementation Strategy
+- **Phase 1**: Initial test execution and failure capture
+- **Phase 2**: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + Codex fix + retest
+- **Phase 3**: Final validation and code certification
+
+## Success Criteria
+- All tests pass (100% pass rate)
+- No test failures or errors in final run
+- Minimal, surgical code changes
+- Iteration logs document fix progression
+- Code certified APPROVED for deployment
+```
+
+### Phase 4: TODO_LIST.md Generation
+
+```markdown
+# Tasks: Test Validation for [Source Session]
+
+## Task Progress
+- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Execute and validate tests with iterative fix cycle → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
+
+## Execution Details
+- **Source Session**: WFS-[source-session-id]
+- **Test Framework**: jest|pytest|cargo
+- **Max Iterations**: 5
+- **Tools**: Gemini diagnosis + Codex resume fixes
+
+## Status Legend
+- `- [ ]` = Pending
+- `- [x]` = Completed
+```
+
+## Output Files Structure
+```
+.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/
+├── workflow-session.json           # Test session metadata
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                    # Test validation plan
+├── TODO_LIST.md                    # Progress tracking
+├── .task/
+│   └── IMPL-001.json               # Test-fix task with cycle spec
+├── .process/
+│   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md         # From concept-enhanced (optional)
+│   ├── context-package.json        # From context-gather
+│   ├── initial-test.log            # Phase 1: Initial test results
+│   ├── fix-iteration-1-diagnosis.md # Gemini diagnosis iteration 1
+│   ├── fix-iteration-1-changes.log  # Codex changes iteration 1
+│   ├── fix-iteration-1-retest.log   # Retest results iteration 1
+│   ├── fix-iteration-N-*.md/log    # Subsequent iterations
+│   └── final-test.log              # Phase 3: Final validation
+└── .summaries/
+    └── IMPL-001-summary.md         # Success report OR failure report
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Input Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Not a test session | Missing workflow_type: "test_session" | Verify session created by test-gen |
+| Source session not found | Invalid source_session_id | Check source session exists |
+| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Ensure source session has completed tasks |
+
+### Test Framework Discovery Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| No test command found | Unknown framework | Manual test command specification |
+| No test files found | Tests not written | Request user to write tests first |
+| Test dependencies missing | Incomplete setup | Run dependency installation |
+
+### Generation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Invalid JSON structure | Template error | Fix task generation logic |
+| Missing required fields | Incomplete metadata | Validate session metadata |
+
+## Integration & Usage
+
+### Command Chain
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4)
+- **Calls**: None (terminal command)
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute` (user-triggered)
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+# Manual fix mode (default)
+/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
+
+# Automated Codex fix mode
+/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+```
+
+### Flag Behavior
+- **No flag**: `meta.use_codex=false`, manual fixes presented to user
+- **--use-codex**: `meta.use_codex=true`, Codex automatically applies fixes with resume mechanism
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Creates test session and calls this tool
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides cross-session context
+- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides test strategy analysis
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes the generated test-fix task
+- `@test-fix-agent` - Agent that executes the iterative test-fix cycle
+
+## Agent Execution Notes
+
+The `@test-fix-agent` will execute the task by following the `flow_control.implementation_approach` specification:
+
+1. **Load task JSON**: Read complete test-fix task from `.task/IMPL-002.json`
+2. **Check meta.use_codex**: Determine fix mode (manual or automated)
+3. **Execute pre_analysis**: Load source context, discover framework, analyze tests
+4. **Phase 1**: Run initial test suite
+5. **Phase 2**: If failures, enter iterative loop:
+   - Use Gemini for diagnosis (analysis mode with bug-fix template)
+   - Check meta.use_codex flag:
+     - If false (default): Present fix suggestions to user for manual application
+     - If true (--use-codex): Use Codex resume for automated fixes (maintains context)
+   - Retest and check for regressions
+   - Repeat max 5 times
+6. **Phase 3**: Generate summary and certify code
+7. **Error Recovery**: Revert changes if max iterations reached
+
+**Bug Diagnosis Template**: Uses bug-fix.md template as referenced in bug-index.md for systematic root cause analysis, code path tracing, and targeted fix recommendations.
+
+**Codex Usage**: The agent uses `codex exec "..." resume --last` pattern ONLY when meta.use_codex=true (--use-codex flag present) to maintain conversation context across multiple fix iterations, ensuring consistency and learning from previous attempts.

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/consolidate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,419 @@
+---
+name: consolidate
+description: Consolidate style variants into independent design systems and plan layout strategies
+usage: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
+argument-hint: "[--base-path \".workflow/WFS-xxx/design-run-xxx\"] [--variants 3] [--layout-variants 3]"
+parameters:
+  - name: --variants
+    type: number
+    default: all available variants from style-cards.json
+    description: "Number of style variants to consolidate (1-N). Processes first N variants from style-cards.json. Creates style-N directories."
+  - name: --session
+    type: string
+    description: "Workflow session ID (e.g., WFS-auth). Finds latest design run in session directory."
+  - name: --base-path
+    type: string
+    description: "Custom base path for input/output. Overrides --session if provided."
+examples:
+  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path ".workflow/WFS-auth/design-run-20250109-143022" --variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session WFS-auth --variants 2
+  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path "./.workflow/.design/run-20250109-150533"  # Uses all variants
+  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session WFS-auth  # Process all variants from extraction
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Design System Consolidation Command
+
+## Overview
+Consolidate user-selected style variants into **independent production-ready design systems**. This command serves as the **Style Planning Phase**, focusing exclusively on design tokens and style guides for the subsequent generation phase.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Style System Focus**: Exclusively handles design system consolidation
+- **Agent-Driven**: Uses ui-design-agent for multi-file generation efficiency
+- **Separate Design Systems**: Generates N independent design systems (one per variant)
+- **Token Refinement**: Refines `proposed_tokens` from each variant into complete systems
+- **Intelligent Synthesis**: Ensures completeness and consistency
+- **Production-Ready**: Complete design system(s) with documentation
+- **Matrix-Ready**: Provides style variants for style × layout matrix exploration in generate phase
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Path Resolution & Variant Loading
+
+```bash
+# Determine base path
+IF --base-path: base_path = {provided_base_path}
+ELSE IF --session: base_path = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/WFS-{session}/design-*")
+ELSE: base_path = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/.design/*")
+
+# Verify extraction output exists
+style_cards_path = "{base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json"
+VERIFY: exists(style_cards_path)
+
+# Load style cards
+style_cards = Read(style_cards_path)
+total_variants = len(style_cards.style_cards)
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Variant Selection
+
+```bash
+# Determine how many variants to consolidate
+IF --variants:
+    variants_count = {provided_count}
+    VALIDATE: 1 <= variants_count <= total_variants
+ELSE:
+    variants_count = total_variants
+
+# Select first N variants
+selected_variants = style_cards.style_cards[0:variants_count]
+VERIFY: selected_variants.length > 0
+
+REPORT: "📦 Generating {variants_count} independent design systems"
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Load Design Context (Optional)
+
+```bash
+# Load brainstorming context if available
+design_context = ""
+IF exists({base_path}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md):
+    design_context = Read(synthesis-specification.md)
+ELSE IF exists({base_path}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md):
+    design_context = Read(ui-designer/analysis.md)
+
+# Load design space analysis from extraction phase
+design_space_analysis = {}
+design_space_path = "{base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json"
+IF exists(design_space_path):
+    design_space_analysis = Read(design_space_path)
+    REPORT: "📊 Loaded design space analysis with {len(design_space_analysis.divergent_directions)} variant directions"
+ELSE:
+    REPORT: "⚠️ No design space analysis found - trend research will be skipped"
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Design System Synthesis (Agent Execution)
+
+```bash
+REPORT: "🤖 Using agent for separate design system generation..."
+
+# Create output directories
+Bash(mkdir -p "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{{1..{variants_count}}}")
+
+# Prepare agent task prompt
+agent_task_prompt = """
+Generate {variants_count} independent production-ready design systems with external trend research and WRITE them to the file system.
+
+## Context
+SESSION: {session_id}
+MODE: Separate design system generation with MCP trend research
+BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+VARIANTS TO PROCESS: {variants_count}
+
+## Variant Data
+{FOR each variant IN selected_variants:
+  ---
+  Variant ID: {variant.id} | Name: {variant.name}
+  Description: {variant.description}
+  Design Philosophy: {variant.design_philosophy}
+  Proposed Tokens: {JSON.stringify(variant.proposed_tokens, null, 2)}
+  ---
+}
+
+{IF design_context: DESIGN CONTEXT (from brainstorming): {design_context}}
+
+{IF design_space_analysis:
+## Design Space Analysis (for MCP Research)
+{JSON.stringify(design_space_analysis, null, 2)}
+
+Note: Each variant has search_keywords and anti_keywords for trend research.
+}
+
+## Task
+For EACH variant (1 to {variants_count}):
+1. **Perform Variant-Specific Trend Research** (if design space analysis available)
+2. **Refine design tokens** using research insights
+3. **Generate and WRITE 2 files** to the file system
+
+## Step 1: Variant-Specific Trend Research (MCP)
+
+IF design_space_analysis is provided, FOR EACH variant:
+
+1. **Extract Research Parameters** from design space analysis:
+   - philosophy_name: The variant's design philosophy
+   - search_keywords: Keywords for trend research
+   - anti_keywords: Patterns to avoid
+
+2. **Build Variant-Specific Queries**:
+   ```javascript
+   queries = [
+     `{philosophy_name} UI design color palettes {search_keywords[:3]} 2024 2025`,
+     `{philosophy_name} typography trends {search_keywords[:3]} web design 2024`,
+     `{philosophy_name} layout patterns {search_keywords[:3]} design systems 2024`,
+     `design systems {philosophy_name} NOT {anti_keywords[:2]}`
+   ]
+   ```
+
+3. **Execute MCP Searches**:
+   ```javascript
+   trend_research = {
+     colors: mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query=queries[0], tokensNum=2000),
+     typography: mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query=queries[1], tokensNum=2000),
+     layout: mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query=queries[2], tokensNum=2000),
+     contrast: mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query=queries[3], tokensNum=2000)
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Shared Accessibility Research** (execute once, apply to all variants):
+   ```javascript
+   accessibility_guidelines = mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+     query="WCAG 2.2 accessibility color contrast ARIA best practices 2024",
+     tokensNum=1500
+   )
+   ```
+
+5. **Use Research Results** to inform token refinement:
+   - Color token refinement guided by `trend_research.colors`
+   - Typography refinement guided by `trend_research.typography`
+   - Layout spacing informed by `trend_research.layout`
+   - Contrast validation using `trend_research.contrast` and `accessibility_guidelines`
+
+IF design_space_analysis is NOT provided:
+- Skip trend research
+- Refine tokens based solely on variant's existing philosophy and proposed tokens
+
+## Step 2: Refinement Rules (apply to each variant)
+1. **Complete Token Coverage**: Ensure all categories present (colors, typography, spacing, etc.)
+2. **Fill Gaps**: Generate missing tokens based on variant's philosophy and trend research
+3. **Maintain Style Identity**: Preserve unique characteristics from proposed tokens
+4. **Semantic Naming**: Use clear names (e.g., "brand-primary" not "color-1")
+5. **Accessibility**: Validate WCAG AA contrast using accessibility guidelines (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+6. **OKLCH Format**: All colors use oklch(L C H / A) format
+7. **Design Philosophy**: Expand variant's design philosophy using trend insights
+8. **Trend Integration**: Incorporate modern trends from MCP research while maintaining variant identity
+
+## Step 3: File Write Instructions
+For EACH variant {variant_id} (1 to {variants_count}), WRITE these 2 files:
+
+### File 1: Design Tokens
+**Path**: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{variant_id}/design-tokens.json
+**Content**: Complete design token JSON with structure:
+```json
+{
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
+    "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
+    "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
+    "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
+    "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
+  },
+  "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
+  "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", ..., "24": "6rem"},
+  "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", ..., "full": "9999px"},
+  "shadows": {"sm": "...", "md": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "..."},
+  "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
+}
+```
+
+### File 2: Style Guide
+**Path**: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{variant_id}/style-guide.md
+**Content**: Markdown documentation with structure:
+```markdown
+# Design System Style Guide - {variant.name}
+
+## Design Philosophy
+{Expanded variant philosophy}
+
+## Color System
+### Brand Colors, Surface Colors, Semantic Colors, Text Colors, Border Colors
+{List all with usage and accessibility notes}
+
+## Typography
+### Font Families, Type Scale, Usage Examples
+{Complete typography documentation}
+
+## Spacing System, Component Guidelines
+{Spacing patterns and component token examples}
+
+## Accessibility
+- All text meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 minimum)
+- UI components meet WCAG AA (3:1 minimum)
+- Focus indicators are clearly visible
+```
+
+## Write Operation Instructions
+- Use Write() tool for each file with the absolute paths provided above
+- Verify each write operation succeeds
+- Report completion with file paths and sizes
+- DO NOT return file contents as text
+
+## Example Write Operations
+```javascript
+// For variant 1
+Write("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json", JSON.stringify(tokens, null, 2))
+Write("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/style-guide.md", guide_content)
+
+// For variant 2
+Write("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-2/design-tokens.json", JSON.stringify(tokens, null, 2))
+Write("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-2/style-guide.md", guide_content)
+```
+
+## Expected Final Report
+Report which files were written and their sizes:
+```
+✅ Written: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json (12.5 KB)
+✅ Written: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/style-guide.md (8.3 KB)
+✅ Written: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-2/design-tokens.json (11.8 KB)
+✅ Written: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-2/style-guide.md (7.9 KB)
+... (for all {variants_count} variants)
+```
+
+## Critical Requirements
+- Generate files for ALL {variants_count} variants
+- Use sequential IDs: style-1, style-2, ..., style-{variants_count}
+- Each variant must be complete and independent
+- Maintain consistent structure across all variants
+- Write files directly using Write() tool - do NOT return contents as text
+"""
+
+# Execute agent task
+Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent", description="Generate {variants_count} separate design systems", prompt=agent_task_prompt)
+
+REPORT: "✅ Agent task dispatched for {variants_count} design systems"
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Verify Agent File Creation
+```bash
+REPORT: "📝 Verifying agent file creation for {variants_count} design systems..."
+
+# Verify each variant's files were created by agent
+FOR variant_id IN range(1, variants_count + 1):
+    tokens_path = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{variant_id}/design-tokens.json"
+    guide_path = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{variant_id}/style-guide.md"
+
+    # Verify files exist
+    VERIFY: exists(tokens_path), "Design tokens not created by agent for style-{variant_id}"
+    VERIFY: exists(guide_path), "Style guide not created by agent for style-{variant_id}"
+
+    # Optional: Validate JSON structure
+    TRY:
+        tokens = Read(tokens_path)
+        tokens_json = parse_json(tokens)
+        VALIDATE: tokens_json.colors exists, "Missing colors in design-tokens.json"
+        VALIDATE: tokens_json.typography exists, "Missing typography in design-tokens.json"
+        VALIDATE: tokens_json.spacing exists, "Missing spacing in design-tokens.json"
+
+        tokens_size = get_file_size(tokens_path)
+        guide_size = get_file_size(guide_path)
+        REPORT: "  ✅ style-{variant_id}/ verified ({tokens_size} KB tokens, {guide_size} KB guide)"
+    CATCH error:
+        ERROR: "Validation failed for style-{variant_id}: {error}"
+        REPORT: "  ⚠️ Files exist but validation failed - review agent output"
+
+REPORT: "✅ All {variants_count} design systems verified"
+```
+
+**Output Structure**:
+```
+{base_path}/style-consolidation/
+├── style-1/ (design-tokens.json, style-guide.md)
+├── style-2/ (same structure)
+└── style-N/ (same structure)
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Completion & Reporting
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {content: "Load session and style cards", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading style cards"},
+  {content: "Select variants for consolidation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Selecting variants"},
+  {content: "Load design context and space analysis", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading context"},
+  {content: "Perform variant-specific trend research", status: "completed", activeForm: "Researching design trends"},
+  {content: "Generate design systems via agent", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating design systems"},
+  {content: "Process agent results and write files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Writing output files"}
+]});
+```
+
+**Completion Message**:
+```
+✅ Design system consolidation complete for session: {session_id}
+
+{IF design_space_analysis:
+🔍 Trend Research Performed:
+- {variants_count} × 4 variant-specific MCP queries ({variants_count * 4} total)
+- 1 shared accessibility research query
+- Each variant refined with independent trend guidance
+}
+
+Generated {variants_count} independent design systems:
+{FOR each variant: - {variant.name} ({variant.id})}
+
+📂 Output: {base_path}/style-consolidation/
+├── style-1/ (design-tokens.json, style-guide.md)
+├── style-2/ (same structure)
+└── style-{variants_count}/ (same structure)
+
+Next: /workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id} --style-variants {variants_count} --targets "dashboard,auth" --layout-variants N
+
+Note: When called from /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto, UI generation is triggered automatically.
+Layout planning is now handled in the generate phase for each specific target.
+```
+
+## design-tokens.json Format
+
+**Token structure** (all variants follow identical structure with different values):
+
+```json
+{
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
+    "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
+    "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
+    "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
+    "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
+  },
+  "typography": {
+    "font_family": {"heading": "...", "body": "...", "mono": "..."},
+    "font_size": {"xs": "...", "sm": "...", "base": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "...", "2xl": "...", "3xl": "...", "4xl": "..."},
+    "font_weight": {"normal": "400", "medium": "500", "semibold": "600", "bold": "700"},
+    "line_height": {"tight": "1.25", "normal": "1.5", "relaxed": "1.75"},
+    "letter_spacing": {"tight": "-0.025em", "normal": "0", "wide": "0.025em"}
+  },
+  "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", ..., "24": "6rem"},
+  "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", ..., "full": "9999px"},
+  "shadows": {"sm": "...", "md": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "..."},
+  "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", "md": "768px", "lg": "1024px", "xl": "1280px", "2xl": "1536px"}
+}
+```
+
+**Requirements**: All colors in OKLCH format, complete token coverage, semantic naming
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **No style cards found**: Report error, suggest running `/workflow:ui-design:extract` first
+- **Invalid variant count**: List available count, auto-select all if called from auto workflow
+- **Parsing errors**: Retry with stricter format instructions
+- **Validation warnings**: Report but continue (non-blocking)
+- **Missing categories**: Claude will fill gaps based on design philosophy
+
+## Key Features
+
+1. **Variant-Specific Trend Research** 🆕 - Agent performs independent MCP queries for each variant (4 queries per variant); Uses design space analysis keywords from extraction phase; Each variant researches its specific design philosophy; Shared accessibility research applied to all variants; Eliminates convergence by maintaining variant-specific research
+2. **Agent-Driven Architecture** - Uses ui-design-agent for multi-file generation and MCP research; Parallel generation of N independent design systems with external trend integration; Structured output parsing with labeled sections; Agent handles both research and synthesis
+3. **Separate Design Systems (Matrix-Ready)** - Generates N independent design systems (one per variant); Each variant maintains unique style identity enhanced by trend research; Provides style foundation for style × layout matrix exploration in generate phase
+4. **Token Refinement with Trend Integration** 🆕 - Reads `proposed_tokens` from style cards; Loads design space analysis for research parameters; Agent performs MCP trend research per variant; Refines tokens using research insights while maintaining style identity
+5. **Complete Design System Output** - design-tokens.json (CSS tokens per variant); style-guide.md (documentation per variant with trend insights)
+6. **Production-Ready Quality** - WCAG AA accessibility validation with MCP research; OKLCH color format for perceptual uniformity; Semantic token naming; Complete token coverage; Modern trends integration
+7. **Streamlined Workflow** - Sequential phases with clear responsibilities; Agent handles MCP research, token refinement, and file generation; Reproducible with deterministic structure; Context-aware (integrates brainstorming and design space analysis)
+8. **Clear Separation of Concerns** - Consolidation focuses on style systems with trend research; Extraction focuses on Claude-native analysis; Layout planning delegated to generate phase for target-specific optimization
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- **Input**:
+  - `style-cards.json` from `/workflow:ui-design:extract` (with `proposed_tokens`)
+  - `design-space-analysis.json` from extraction phase (with search keywords for MCP research)
+  - `--variants` parameter (default: all variants)
+- **Output**: Style Systems: `style-consolidation/style-{n}/design-tokens.json` and `style-guide.md` for each variant (enhanced with trend research)
+- **Context**: Optional `synthesis-specification.md` or `ui-designer/analysis.md`
+- **Auto Integration**: Automatically triggered by `/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto` workflow
+- **Next Command**: `/workflow:ui-design:generate --style-variants N --targets "..." --layout-variants M` performs target-specific layout planning

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/explore-auto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,626 @@
+---
+name: explore-auto
+description: Exploratory UI design workflow - Generate and compare multiple style × layout combinations (3×3 matrix exploration)
+usage: /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto [--prompt "<desc>"] [--images "<glob>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>] [--batch-plan]
+argument-hint: "[--prompt \"Modern SaaS with 3 styles\"] [--images \"refs/*.png\"] [--targets \"dashboard,auth,navbar,hero\"] [--target-type \"auto\"] [--session WFS-xxx] [--style-variants 3] [--layout-variants 3]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Generate 3 style variants for modern blog: home, article, author"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "SaaS dashboard and settings with 2 layout options"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --images "refs/*.png" --prompt "E-commerce: home, product, cart" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "navbar,hero" --target-type "component" --prompt "Compare 3 navigation bar designs" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 2
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "card,form,button" --images "refs/*.png" --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "home,dashboard" --target-type "page"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*), Task(conceptual-planning-agent)
+---
+
+# UI Design Auto Workflow Command
+
+## Overview & Execution Model
+
+**Fully autonomous orchestrator**: Executes all design phases sequentially from style extraction to design integration, with optional batch planning.
+
+**Unified Target System**: Generates `style_variants × layout_variants × targets` prototypes, where targets can be:
+- **Pages** (full-page layouts): home, dashboard, settings, etc.
+- **Components** (isolated UI elements): navbar, card, hero, form, etc.
+- **Mixed**: Can combine both in a single workflow
+
+**Autonomous Flow**:
+1. User triggers: `/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto [params]`
+2. Phase 1 (style-extract) → Auto-continues
+3. Phase 2 (style-consolidate) → Auto-continues
+4. Phase 3 (ui-generate) → Auto-continues with unified target list
+5. Phase 4 (design-update) → Auto-continues
+6. Phase 5 (batch-plan, optional) → Reports completion
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**: TodoWrite tracks phase status. Upon completion, coordinator constructs next command and executes immediately. No user intervention required.
+
+**Target Type Detection**: Automatically inferred from prompt/targets, or explicitly set via `--target-type`.
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: TodoWrite initialization → Phase 1 execution
+2. **No Preliminary Validation**: Sub-commands handle their own validation
+3. **Parse & Pass**: Extract data from each output for next phase
+4. **Default to All**: When selecting variants/prototypes, use ALL generated items
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after each phase
+
+## Parameter Requirements
+
+**Optional Parameters** (all have smart defaults):
+- `--targets "<list>"`: Comma-separated targets (pages/components) to generate (inferred from prompt/session if omitted)
+- `--target-type "page|component|auto"`: Explicitly set target type (default: `auto` - intelligent detection)
+- `--session <id>`: Workflow session ID (standalone mode if omitted)
+- `--images "<glob>"`: Reference image paths (default: `design-refs/*`)
+- `--prompt "<description>"`: Design style and target description
+- `--style-variants <count>`: Style variants (default: inferred from prompt or 3, range: 1-5)
+- `--layout-variants <count>`: Layout variants per style (default: inferred or 3, range: 1-5)
+- `--batch-plan`: Auto-generate implementation tasks after design-update
+
+**Legacy Parameters** (maintained for backward compatibility):
+- `--pages "<list>"`: Alias for `--targets` with `--target-type page`
+- `--components "<list>"`: Alias for `--targets` with `--target-type component`
+
+**Input Rules**:
+- Must provide at least one: `--images` or `--prompt` or `--targets`
+- Multiple parameters can be combined for guided analysis
+- If `--targets` not provided, intelligently inferred from prompt/session
+
+**Supported Target Types**:
+- **Pages** (full layouts): home, dashboard, settings, profile, login, etc.
+- **Components** (UI elements):
+  - Navigation: navbar, header, menu, breadcrumb, tabs, sidebar
+  - Content: hero, card, list, table, grid, timeline
+  - Input: form, search, filter, input-group
+  - Feedback: modal, alert, toast, badge, progress
+  - Media: gallery, carousel, video-player, image-card
+  - Other: footer, pagination, dropdown, tooltip, avatar
+
+**Intelligent Prompt Parsing**: Extracts variant counts from natural language:
+- "Generate **3 style variants**" → `--style-variants 3`
+- "**2 layout options**" → `--layout-variants 2`
+- "Create **4 styles** with **2 layouts each**" → `--style-variants 4 --layout-variants 2`
+- Explicit flags override prompt inference
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+**Matrix Mode** (unified):
+- Generates `style_variants × layout_variants × targets` prototypes
+- **Phase 1**: `style_variants` style options
+- **Phase 2**: `style_variants` independent design systems
+- **Phase 3**: `style_variants × layout_variants × targets` prototypes
+  - Pages: Full-page layouts with complete structure
+  - Components: Isolated elements with minimal wrapper
+  - Mixed: Combination based on intelligent detection
+
+**Integrated vs. Standalone**:
+- `--session` flag determines session integration or standalone execution
+
+## 6-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 0a: Intelligent Prompt Parsing
+```bash
+# Extract variant counts from prompt if not explicitly provided
+IF --prompt provided AND (NOT --style-variants OR NOT --layout-variants):
+    # Parse: "3 style variants", "4 styles", "2 layout options", "3 layouts each"
+    style_match = regex_search(prompt_text, r"(\d+)\s*(style\s*variants?|styles?)")
+    layout_match = regex_search(prompt_text, r"(\d+)\s*(layout\s*(variants?|options?)|layouts?)")
+
+    style_variants = style_match ? int(match[1]) : (--style-variants OR 3)
+    layout_variants = layout_match ? int(match[1]) : (--layout-variants OR 3)
+ELSE:
+    style_variants = --style-variants OR 3
+    layout_variants = --layout-variants OR 3
+
+VALIDATE: 1 <= style_variants <= 5, 1 <= layout_variants <= 5
+STORE: style_variants, layout_variants
+```
+
+### Phase 0b: Run Initialization & Directory Setup
+```bash
+# Generate run ID and determine base path
+run_id = "run-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
+
+IF --session:
+    base_path = ".workflow/WFS-{session_id}/design-${run_id}"
+ELSE:
+    base_path = ".workflow/.design/${run_id}"
+
+# Create directories
+Bash(mkdir -p "${base_path}/{style-extraction,style-consolidation,prototypes}")
+
+# Initialize metadata
+Write({base_path}/.run-metadata.json): {
+  "run_id": "${run_id}",
+  "session_id": "${session_id}",
+  "timestamp": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)",
+  "workflow": "ui-design:auto",
+  "parameters": {
+    "style_variants": ${style_variants},
+    "layout_variants": ${layout_variants},
+    "pages": "${inferred_page_list}",
+    "prompt": "${prompt_text}",
+    "images": "${images_pattern}"
+  },
+  "status": "in_progress"
+}
+
+STORE: run_id, base_path
+```
+
+### Phase 0c: Unified Target Inference with Intelligent Type Detection
+```bash
+target_list = []
+target_type = "auto"  # auto, page, component
+target_source = "none"
+
+# Step 1: Handle legacy parameters (backward compatibility)
+IF --pages provided:
+    target_list = split_and_clean(--pages, delimiters=[",", ";", "、"])
+    target_type = "page"
+    target_source = "explicit_legacy"
+    REPORT: "📋 Using explicitly provided pages (legacy): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+ELSE IF --components provided:
+    target_list = split_and_clean(--components, delimiters=[",", ";", "、"])
+    target_type = "component"
+    target_source = "explicit_legacy"
+    REPORT: "🧩 Using explicitly provided components (legacy): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Step 2: Handle unified --targets parameter
+ELSE IF --targets provided:
+    target_list = split_and_clean(--targets, delimiters=[",", ";", "、"])
+    target_source = "explicit"
+
+    # Override type if explicitly set
+    IF --target-type provided AND --target-type != "auto":
+        target_type = --target-type
+        REPORT: "🎯 Using explicitly provided targets with type '{target_type}': {', '.join(target_list)}"
+    ELSE:
+        # Intelligent type detection
+        target_type = detect_target_type(target_list)
+        REPORT: "🎯 Using explicitly provided targets (detected type: {target_type}): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Step 3: Dynamic prompt analysis
+ELSE IF --prompt provided:
+    REPORT: "🔍 Analyzing prompt to identify targets..."
+
+    # Internal Claude analysis
+    analysis_prompt = """
+    Analyze the UI design request and identify targets (pages or components) with their types.
+
+    Request: "{prompt_text}"
+
+    Output JSON:
+    {
+      "targets": [
+        {"name": "normalized-name", "type": "page|component", "purpose": "description", "priority": "high|medium|low"}
+      ],
+      "primary_type": "page|component|mixed",
+      "shared_elements": ["header", "footer"],
+      "context": "application context description"
+    }
+
+    Rules:
+    - Normalize to URL-friendly (lowercase, hyphens, no spaces)
+    - Detect type: page (full layouts like home, dashboard) vs component (UI elements like navbar, card)
+    - Consolidate synonyms (homepage → home, navigation → navbar)
+    - Common pages: home, dashboard, settings, profile, login, signup
+    - Common components: navbar, header, hero, card, form, button, modal, footer
+    - If prompt mentions "page", "screen", "view" → type: page
+    - If prompt mentions "component", "element", "widget" → type: component
+    """
+
+    target_structure = analyze_prompt_structure(analysis_prompt, prompt_text)
+    target_list = extract_target_names_from_structure(target_structure)
+    target_type = target_structure.primary_type OR detect_target_type(target_list)
+    target_source = "prompt_analysis"
+
+    IF target_list:
+        REPORT: "🎯 Identified targets from prompt (type: {target_type}):"
+        FOR target IN target_structure.targets:
+            icon = "📄" IF target.type == "page" ELSE "🧩"
+            REPORT: "   {icon} {target.name}: {target.purpose} [{target.priority}]"
+        IF target_structure.shared_elements:
+            REPORT: "🔧 Shared elements: {', '.join(shared_elements)}"
+
+# Step 4: Extract from synthesis-specification.md (for session mode)
+ELSE IF --session AND exists(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md):
+    synthesis = Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
+    target_list = extract_targets_from_synthesis(synthesis)  # Returns pages by default
+    target_type = "page"
+    target_source = "synthesis"
+    REPORT: "📋 Extracted from synthesis: {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Step 5: Fallback default
+IF NOT target_list:
+    target_list = ["home"]
+    target_type = "page"
+    target_source = "default"
+    REPORT: "⚠️ No targets identified, using default: 'home' (page)"
+
+# Validate and clean target names
+validated_targets = []
+invalid_targets = []
+FOR target IN target_list:
+    cleaned = target.strip().lower().replace(" ", "-")
+    IF regex_match(cleaned, r"^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9_-]*$"):
+        validated_targets.append(cleaned)
+    ELSE:
+        invalid_targets.append(target)
+
+IF invalid_targets:
+    REPORT: "⚠️ Skipped invalid: {', '.join(invalid_targets)}"
+
+IF NOT validated_targets:
+    validated_targets = ["home"]
+    target_type = "page"
+    REPORT: "⚠️ All invalid, using default: 'home'"
+
+# Override target type if explicitly set
+IF --target-type provided AND --target-type != "auto":
+    target_type = --target-type
+    REPORT: "🔧 Target type overridden to: {target_type}"
+
+# Interactive confirmation
+type_emoji = "📄" IF target_type == "page" ELSE ("🧩" IF target_type == "component" ELSE "🎯")
+type_label = "PAGES" IF target_type == "page" ELSE ("COMPONENTS" IF target_type == "component" ELSE "TARGETS")
+
+REPORT: ""
+REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+REPORT: "{type_emoji} {type_label} CONFIRMATION"
+REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+REPORT: "Type: {target_type}"
+REPORT: "Source: {target_source}"
+REPORT: "Targets ({len(validated_targets)}): {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+REPORT: ""
+REPORT: "Options:"
+REPORT: "  • 'continue/yes' - proceed"
+REPORT: "  • 'targets: item1,item2' - replace list"
+REPORT: "  • 'skip: item-name' - remove targets"
+REPORT: "  • 'add: item-name' - add targets"
+REPORT: "  • 'type: page|component' - change type"
+REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+
+user_input = WAIT_FOR_USER_INPUT()
+
+# Process input
+IF user_input MATCHES r"^(continue|yes|ok|proceed)$":
+    REPORT: "✅ Proceeding with {len(validated_targets)} {target_type}(s): {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+ELSE IF user_input MATCHES r"^targets:\s*(.+)$":
+    new_targets = split_and_clean(extract_after("targets:"), [",", ";"])
+    validated_targets = [t.strip().lower().replace(" ", "-") for t in new_targets if t.strip()]
+    REPORT: "✅ Updated: {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+ELSE IF user_input MATCHES r"^skip:\s*(.+)$":
+    to_skip = [t.strip().lower() for t in extract_after("skip:").split(",")]
+    validated_targets = [t for t in validated_targets if t not in to_skip]
+    REPORT: "✅ Removed: {', '.join(to_skip)}, Final: {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+ELSE IF user_input MATCHES r"^add:\s*(.+)$":
+    to_add = [t.strip().lower().replace(" ", "-") for t in extract_after("add:").split(",") if t.strip()]
+    validated_targets.extend(to_add)
+    validated_targets = list(dict.fromkeys(validated_targets))  # Remove duplicates
+    REPORT: "✅ Added: {', '.join(to_add)}, Final: {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+ELSE IF user_input MATCHES r"^type:\s*(page|component)$":
+    target_type = extract_after("type:").strip()
+    REPORT: "✅ Type changed to: {target_type}"
+ELSE:
+    REPORT: "⚠️ Invalid input, proceeding with: {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+
+IF NOT validated_targets:
+    validated_targets = ["home"]
+    target_type = "page"
+
+STORE: inferred_target_list = validated_targets
+STORE: target_type = target_type
+STORE: target_inference_source = target_source
+STORE: target_structure_data = target_structure IF exists(target_structure) ELSE {}
+```
+
+**Helper Function: detect_target_type()**
+```bash
+detect_target_type(target_list):
+    # Common page keywords
+    page_keywords = ["home", "dashboard", "settings", "profile", "login", "signup", "auth",
+                     "landing", "about", "contact", "pricing", "account", "admin"]
+
+    # Common component keywords
+    component_keywords = ["navbar", "header", "footer", "hero", "card", "button", "form",
+                          "modal", "alert", "toast", "menu", "sidebar", "breadcrumb", "tabs",
+                          "table", "list", "grid", "carousel", "gallery", "search", "filter"]
+
+    page_matches = 0
+    component_matches = 0
+
+    FOR target IN target_list:
+        IF target IN page_keywords:
+            page_matches += 1
+        ELSE IF target IN component_keywords:
+            component_matches += 1
+        ELSE IF contains_keyword(target, ["page", "screen", "view"]):
+            page_matches += 1
+        ELSE IF contains_keyword(target, ["component", "widget", "element"]):
+            component_matches += 1
+
+    # Decision logic
+    IF component_matches > page_matches:
+        RETURN "component"
+    ELSE IF page_matches > 0 OR len(target_list) == 0:
+        RETURN "page"
+    ELSE:
+        # Ambiguous - default to page
+        RETURN "page"
+```
+
+### Phase 1: Style Extraction
+**Command**:
+```bash
+images_flag = --images present ? "--images \"{image_glob}\"" : ""
+prompt_flag = --prompt present ? "--prompt \"{prompt_text}\"" : ""
+run_base_flag = "--base-path \"{base_path}\""
+
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:extract {run_base_flag} {images_flag} {prompt_flag} --variants {style_variants}"
+SlashCommand(command)
+```
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 2
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Style Consolidation (Separate Design Systems)
+**Command**:
+```bash
+run_base_flag = "--base-path \"{base_path}\""
+
+# Consolidate generates independent design systems by default
+# IMPORTANT: Pass --layout-variants to ensure correct number of layout strategies are generated
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:consolidate {run_base_flag} --variants {style_variants} --layout-variants {layout_variants}"
+SlashCommand(command)
+```
+**Result**: Generates `style_variants` independent design systems:
+- `style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json`
+- `style-consolidation/style-{N}/design-tokens.json`
+
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 3
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Matrix UI Generation (Unified)
+**Command**:
+```bash
+run_base_flag = "--base-path \"{base_path}\""
+
+# Build unified targets string
+targets_string = ",".join(inferred_target_list)
+VERIFY: targets_string matches r"^[a-z0-9_-]+(,[a-z0-9_-]+)*$"
+
+# Prepare command with unified parameters
+targets_flag = "--targets \"{targets_string}\""
+type_flag = "--target-type \"{target_type}\""
+
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:generate {run_base_flag} {targets_flag} {type_flag} --style-variants {style_variants} --layout-variants {layout_variants}"
+
+total_prototypes = style_variants * layout_variants * len(inferred_target_list)
+
+# Report based on type
+IF target_type == "page":
+    type_icon = "📄"
+    type_label = "Pages"
+    context_note = "Full-page layouts"
+ELSE IF target_type == "component":
+    type_icon = "🧩"
+    type_label = "Components"
+    context_note = "Isolated elements with minimal wrapper"
+ELSE:
+    type_icon = "🎯"
+    type_label = "Targets"
+    context_note = "Mixed pages and components"
+
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 3: Matrix UI Generation"
+REPORT: "   {type_icon} {type_label}: {targets_string}"
+REPORT: "   Matrix: {style_variants}×{layout_variants}"
+REPORT: "   Total: {total_prototypes} prototypes"
+REPORT: "   Context: {context_note}"
+
+SlashCommand(command)
+```
+
+**Result**:
+- File naming: `{target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html`
+- Total: `style_variants × layout_variants × targets`
+- Matrix view: `compare.html` with interactive grid
+- Rendering: Full-page for pages, minimal wrapper for components
+
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 4
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Design System Integration
+**Command**:
+```bash
+session_flag = --session present ? "--session {session_id}" : ""
+
+# Omit --selected-prototypes to use ALL generated prototypes
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:update {session_flag}"
+SlashCommand(command)
+```
+**Auto-Continue**: If `--batch-plan` present → Phase 5, else complete
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Batch Task Generation (Optional)
+**Condition**: Only if `--batch-plan` flag present
+
+**Execution**:
+```bash
+FOR target IN inferred_target_list:
+    IF target_type == "page":
+        SlashCommand("/workflow:plan --agent \"Implement {target} page based on design system\"")
+    ELSE IF target_type == "component":
+        SlashCommand("/workflow:plan --agent \"Implement {target} component based on design system\"")
+    ELSE:
+        SlashCommand("/workflow:plan --agent \"Implement {target} based on design system\"")
+```
+**Completion**: Workflow complete
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute style consolidation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing style consolidation"},
+  {"content": "Execute UI prototype generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI generation"},
+  {"content": "Execute design system integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing design system integration"}
+]})
+
+// After each phase: Mark current completed, next in_progress, rest pending
+// Phase 1 done → Phase 2 in_progress
+// Phase 2 done → Phase 3 in_progress
+// ... continues until all completed
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Phase Failures**: Workflow halts, keeps failed phase `in_progress`, reports error with recovery instructions
+- **Ambiguity**: Defaults to ALL available items (variants/prototypes) to ensure autonomous continuation
+
+## Key Features & Workflow Position
+
+**Core Improvements**:
+- **Zero External Dependencies**: Pure Claude + agents, no CLI tools
+- **Streamlined Commands**: Unified patterns, no tool-specific flags
+- **Reproducible Flow**: Deterministic phase dependencies
+- **Intelligent Parsing**: Natural language → variant counts, pages
+- **Run Isolation**: Each execution in timestamped run directory
+
+**Workflow Bridge**: Connects brainstorming (`synthesis-specification.md`) → design phase → planning (`/workflow:plan`) in fully automated fashion with matrix-based design exploration.
+
+## Example Execution Flows
+
+### Example 1: Default 3×3 Matrix (Page Mode - Prompt Inference)
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Modern minimalist blog with home, article, and author pages"
+
+# Auto-detected type: page
+# Inferred: 3 style variants, 3 layout variants (default)
+# Targets: home, article, author
+# Total: 27 full-page prototypes (3×3×3)
+```
+
+### Example 2: Custom 2×2 Matrix with Session
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --session WFS-ecommerce --images "refs/*.png" --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 2
+
+# Auto-detected from session synthesis
+# Total: 2×2×N prototypes (N from inference)
+```
+
+### Example 3: Unified - Navbar Design Comparison
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "navbar,hero" --target-type "component" --prompt "Compare 3 navigation bar designs for SaaS product" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 2
+
+# Explicit type: component
+# Targets: navbar, hero
+# Matrix: 3 styles × 2 layouts
+# Total: 12 component prototypes (3×2×2)
+# Output: navbar-style-1-layout-1.html, navbar-style-1-layout-2.html, ...
+```
+
+### Example 4: Unified - Card & Form Exploration
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "card,form,button" --images "refs/*.png" --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 3
+
+# Auto-detected type: component (based on keywords)
+# Targets: card, form, button
+# Matrix: 2 styles × 3 layouts
+# Total: 18 component prototypes (2×3×3)
+# Context: Each component in minimal wrapper for isolated comparison
+```
+
+### Example 5: Intelligent Parsing + Batch Planning
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --session WFS-saas --prompt "Create 4 styles with 2 layouts for SaaS dashboard and settings" --batch-plan
+
+# Auto-detected type: page
+# Parsed: 4 styles, 2 layouts
+# Targets: dashboard, settings
+# Total: 16 full-page prototypes (4×2×2)
+# Auto-generates implementation tasks for each target
+```
+
+### Example 6: Auto-Detected Components from Prompt
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Design exploration for pricing table and testimonial card components" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 2
+
+# Auto-detected type: component (keyword: "components")
+# Inferred targets: pricing-table, testimonial-card
+# Matrix: 3 styles × 2 layouts
+# Total: 12 component prototypes (3×2×2)
+```
+
+### Example 7: Legacy Parameter Support
+```bash
+# Using legacy --pages parameter (backward compatible)
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --pages "home,dashboard,settings"
+
+# Equivalent to: --targets "home,dashboard,settings" --target-type "page"
+```
+
+### Example 8: Mixed Mode (Future Enhancement)
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "home,dashboard,navbar,hero,card" --target-type "auto"
+
+# Auto-detection: home, dashboard → page; navbar, hero, card → component
+# Generates appropriate wrapper for each target type
+# Future: Support per-target type specification
+```
+
+## Final Completion Message
+
+**Unified Template**:
+```
+✅ UI Design Explore-Auto Workflow Complete!
+
+Run ID: {run_id}
+Session: {session_id or "standalone"}
+Type: {target_type_icon} {target_type_label}
+Matrix: {style_variants}×{layout_variants} ({total_prototypes} total prototypes)
+Input: {images and/or prompt summary}
+
+Phase 1 - Style Extraction: {style_variants} style variants
+Phase 2 - Style Consolidation: {style_variants} independent design systems
+Phase 3 - Matrix Generation: {style_variants}×{layout_variants}×{target_count} = {total_prototypes} prototypes
+Phase 4 - Design Update: Brainstorming artifacts updated
+{IF batch-plan: Phase 5 - Task Generation: {task_count} implementation tasks created}
+
+📂 Run Output: {base_path}/
+  ├── style-consolidation/  ({style_variants} design systems)
+  ├── prototypes/           ({total_prototypes} HTML/CSS files)
+  └── .run-metadata.json    (run configuration)
+
+🌐 Interactive Preview: {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html
+  - {style_variants}×{layout_variants} matrix view with synchronized scrolling
+  - {IF target_type == "component": "Isolated rendering with minimal wrapper" ELSE: "Full-page layouts"}
+  - Side-by-side comparison for design decisions
+  - Selection export for implementation
+
+{target_type_icon} Targets Explored: {', '.join(inferred_target_list)}
+  Type: {target_type}
+  Context: {IF target_type == "page": "Full-page layouts" ELSE IF target_type == "component": "Isolated UI elements" ELSE: "Mixed targets"}
+
+{IF batch-plan:
+📋 Implementation Tasks: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.task/
+Next: /workflow:execute to begin implementation
+}
+{ELSE:
+Next Steps:
+1. Open compare.html to preview all variants
+2. Select preferred style×layout combinations per target
+3. Run /workflow:plan to create implementation tasks
+{IF target_type == "component": "4. Integrate selected components into pages"}
+}
+```
+
+**Dynamic Values**:
+- `target_type_icon`: "📄" for page, "🧩" for component, "🎯" for mixed/auto
+- `target_type_label`: "Pages" for page, "Components" for component, "Targets" for mixed/auto
+- `target_count`: `len(inferred_target_list)`
+- All other placeholders are resolved from stored phase data

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/extract.md

@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
+---
+name: extract
+description: Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's analysis
+usage: /workflow:ui-design:extract [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--variants <count>]
+argument-hint: "[--base-path \".workflow/WFS-xxx/design-run-xxx\"] [--session WFS-xxx] [--images \"refs/*.png\"] [--prompt \"Modern minimalist\"] [--variants 3]"
+parameters:
+  - name: --variants
+    type: number
+    default: 1
+    description: "Number of design variants to extract (1-5). Each variant will be maximally contrasting. Generates style-cards.json with variant-N IDs."
+  - name: --images
+    type: string
+    description: "Glob pattern for reference images (e.g., 'refs/*.png'). Supports PNG, JPG, WebP."
+  - name: --prompt
+    type: string
+    description: "Text description of desired style (e.g., 'Modern minimalist blog'). Can be combined with --images."
+  - name: --session
+    type: string
+    description: "Workflow session ID (e.g., WFS-auth). Creates design run in session directory."
+  - name: --base-path
+    type: string
+    description: "Custom base path for output. Overrides --session if provided."
+examples:
+  - /workflow:ui-design:extract --images "design-refs/*.png" --variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:extract --prompt "Modern minimalist blog, dark theme" --variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:extract --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png" --prompt "Linear.app style" --variants 2
+  - /workflow:ui-design:extract --base-path ".workflow/WFS-auth/design-run-20250109-143022" --images "refs/*.png" --variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:extract --prompt "Bold vibrant" --variants 1  # Single variant (default)
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# Style Extraction Command
+
+## Overview
+Extract design style elements from reference images or text prompts using Claude's built-in analysis capabilities. Generates a single, comprehensive `style-cards.json` file containing multiple design variants with complete token proposals.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Claude-Native**: 100% Claude-driven analysis, no external tools
+- **Single Output**: Only `style-cards.json` with embedded token proposals
+- **Sequential Execution**: Generate multiple style variants in one pass
+- **Flexible Input**: Images, text prompts, or both (hybrid mode)
+- **Reproducible**: Deterministic output structure
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 0: Parameter Detection & Validation
+
+```bash
+# Detect input source
+IF --images AND --prompt: input_mode = "hybrid"  # Text guides image analysis
+ELSE IF --images: input_mode = "image"
+ELSE IF --prompt: input_mode = "text"
+ELSE: ERROR: "Must provide --images or --prompt"
+
+# Determine base path (PRIORITY: --base-path > --session > standalone)
+IF --base-path:
+    base_path = {provided_base_path}; session_mode = "integrated"
+    session_id = base_path matches ".workflow/WFS-*/design-*" ? extract_session_id(base_path) : "standalone"
+ELSE:
+    run_id = "run-" + timestamp()
+    IF --session:
+        session_mode = "integrated"; session_id = {provided_session}
+        base_path = ".workflow/WFS-{session_id}/design-{run_id}/"
+    ELSE:
+        session_mode = "standalone"; base_path = ".workflow/.design/{run_id}/"
+
+# Set variant count
+variants_count = --variants OR 1; VALIDATE: 1 <= variants_count <= 5
+```
+
+### Phase 1: Input Loading & Validation
+
+```bash
+# Expand and validate inputs
+IF input_mode IN ["image", "hybrid"]:
+    expanded_images = Glob({--images pattern}); VERIFY: expanded_images.length > 0
+    FOR each image: image_data[i] = Read({image_path})
+
+IF input_mode IN ["text", "hybrid"]:
+    VALIDATE: --prompt is non-empty; prompt_guidance = {--prompt value}
+
+CREATE: {base_path}/style-extraction/
+```
+
+### Phase 0.5: AI-Driven Design Space Divergence
+
+```bash
+# Step 1: Load project context
+project_context = ""
+IF exists({base_path}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md):
+    project_context = Read(synthesis-specification.md)
+ELSE IF exists({base_path}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md):
+    project_context = Read(ui-designer/analysis.md)
+
+REPORT: "🎨 Analyzing design space to generate maximally contrasting directions..."
+
+# Step 2: AI-driven divergent direction generation
+divergence_prompt = """
+Analyze user requirements and generate {variants_count} MAXIMALLY CONTRASTING design directions.
+
+USER INPUT:
+{IF prompt_guidance: Prompt: "{prompt_guidance}"}
+{IF project_context: Project Context Summary: {extract_key_points(project_context, max_lines=10)}}
+{IF images: Reference Images: {image_count} images will be analyzed in next phase}
+
+DESIGN ATTRIBUTE SPACE (maximize contrast):
+- Color Saturation: [monochrome, muted, moderate, vibrant, hypersaturated]
+- Visual Weight: [minimal, light, balanced, bold, heavy]
+- Formality: [playful, casual, professional, formal, luxury]
+- Organic vs Geometric: [organic/fluid, soft, balanced, geometric, brutalist]
+- Innovation: [timeless, modern, contemporary, trendy, experimental]
+- Density: [spacious, airy, balanced, compact, dense]
+
+TASK:
+1. Identify design space center point from user requirements
+2. Generate {variants_count} directions that:
+   - Are MAXIMALLY DISTANT from each other in attribute space
+   - Each occupies a distinct region/quadrant of the design spectrum
+   - Together provide diverse aesthetic options
+   - Are contextually appropriate for project type
+   - Have clear, memorable philosophical differences
+3. For each direction, generate:
+   - Specific search keywords for MCP research (3-5 keywords)
+   - Anti-keywords to avoid (2-3 keywords)
+   - Clear rationale explaining contrast with other variants
+
+OUTPUT FORMAT: Valid JSON only, no markdown:
+{"design_space_center": {attributes}, "divergent_directions": [
+  {"id": "variant-1", "philosophy_name": "Brief name 2-3 words",
+   "design_attributes": {attribute_scores}, "search_keywords": [...],
+   "anti_keywords": [...], "rationale": "..."}
+], "contrast_verification": {"min_pairwise_distance": "0.75", "strategy": "..."}}
+
+RULES: Output ONLY valid JSON, maximize inter-variant distance, ensure each variant
+occupies distinct aesthetic region, avoid overlapping attributes
+"""
+
+# Execute AI analysis
+divergent_directions = parse_json(Claude_Native_Analysis(divergence_prompt))
+
+REPORT: "✅ Generated {variants_count} contrasting design directions:"
+FOR direction IN divergent_directions.divergent_directions:
+    REPORT: "  - {direction.philosophy_name}: {direction.rationale}"
+
+design_space_analysis = divergent_directions
+
+# Step 3: Save design space analysis for consolidation phase
+Write({file_path: "{base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json",
+       content: JSON.stringify(design_space_analysis, null, 2)})
+REPORT: "💾 Saved design space analysis to design-space-analysis.json"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Variant-Specific Style Synthesis (Claude Native Analysis)
+
+**Analysis Prompt Template**:
+```
+Generate {variants_count} design style proposals, each guided by its pre-analyzed design direction.
+
+INPUT MODE: {input_mode}
+{IF input_mode IN ["image", "hybrid"]: VISUAL REFERENCES: {list of loaded images}}
+{IF input_mode IN ["text", "hybrid"]: TEXT GUIDANCE: "{prompt_guidance}"}
+
+DESIGN SPACE ANALYSIS: {design_space_analysis summary}
+
+VARIANT-SPECIFIC DESIGN DIRECTIONS:
+{FOR each direction IN design_space_analysis.divergent_directions:
+---
+VARIANT: {direction.id} | PHILOSOPHY: {direction.philosophy_name}
+DESIGN ATTRIBUTES: {direction.design_attributes}
+SEARCH KEYWORDS: {direction.search_keywords}
+ANTI-PATTERNS (avoid): {direction.anti_keywords}
+RATIONALE: {direction.rationale}
+---}
+
+TASK: Generate {variants_count} design style variants where EACH variant:
+1. Strictly follows its pre-defined design philosophy and attributes
+2. Maintains maximum contrast with other variants' attributes
+3. Incorporates its design direction and avoids its anti-patterns
+4. Uses OKLCH color space for all color values
+5. Includes complete, production-ready design token proposals
+6. Applies WCAG AA accessibility guidelines (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+
+CRITICAL RULES FOR CONTRAST:
+- Variant-1 should feel completely different from Variant-2/3
+- Use each variant's specific attribute scores (e.g., "monochrome" vs "vibrant")
+- Each variant should embody its unique design direction
+- If Variant-1 is "minimal/geometric", Variant-2 must be "bold/organic" or similar contrast
+
+OUTPUT FORMAT: JSON matching this structure:
+{"extraction_metadata": {"session_id": "...", "input_mode": "...", "timestamp": "...", "variants_count": N},
+ "style_cards": [
+   {"id": "variant-1", "name": "Concise Style Name (2-3 words)", "description": "2-3 sentences",
+    "design_philosophy": "Core design principles",
+    "preview": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "background": "oklch(...)", "font_heading": "...", "border_radius": "..."},
+    "proposed_tokens": {
+      "colors": {"brand": {...}, "surface": {...}, "semantic": {...}, "text": {...}, "border": {...}},
+      "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
+      "spacing": {"0": "0", ..., "24": "6rem"},
+      "border_radius": {"none": "0", ..., "full": "9999px"},
+      "shadows": {"sm": "...", ..., "xl": "..."},
+      "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
+    }}
+   // Repeat for ALL {variants_count} variants
+ ]}
+
+RULES: Each variant must strictly adhere to pre-defined attributes; maximize visual contrast;
+all colors in OKLCH format; complete token structures; semantic naming;
+WCAG AA accessibility (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Parse & Write Output
+
+```bash
+style_cards_data = parse_json(claude_response)
+Write({file_path: "{base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json", content: style_cards_data})
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Completion
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {content: "Validate inputs and create directories", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating inputs"},
+  {content: "Analyze design space for maximum contrast", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing design space"},
+  {content: `Generate ${variants_count} divergent design directions`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating directions"},
+  {content: "Save design space analysis for consolidation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Saving design space analysis"},
+  {content: `Generate ${variants_count} contrasting style variants`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating variants"}
+]});
+```
+
+**Completion Message**:
+```
+✅ Style extraction complete for session: {session_id}
+
+Input mode: {input_mode}
+{IF image mode: Images analyzed: {count}}
+{IF prompt mode: Prompt: "{truncated_prompt}"}
+
+🎨 Design Space Analysis:
+- Generated {variants_count} MAXIMALLY CONTRASTING design directions
+- Min pairwise contrast distance: {design_space_analysis.contrast_verification.min_pairwise_distance}
+- Strategy: {design_space_analysis.contrast_verification.strategy}
+
+Generated {variants_count} style variant(s):
+{FOR each card: - {card.name} ({card.id}) - {card.design_philosophy}}
+
+📂 Outputs:
+- {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json
+- {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json
+
+Next: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {variants_count} [--layout-variants <count>]
+
+Note: When called from /workflow:ui-design:auto, consolidation is triggered automatically.
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/design-{run_id}/style-extraction/
+├── style-cards.json              # Complete style variants with token proposals
+└── design-space-analysis.json    # Design directions for consolidation phase
+
+OR (standalone mode):
+
+.workflow/.design/{run_id}/style-extraction/
+├── style-cards.json
+└── design-space-analysis.json
+```
+
+### style-cards.json Format
+
+**Schema Structure**:
+
+```json
+{
+  "extraction_metadata": {"session_id": "string", "input_mode": "image|text|hybrid",
+                           "timestamp": "ISO 8601", "variants_count": "number"},
+  "style_cards": [
+    {
+      "id": "variant-{n}", "name": "Concise Style Name (2-3 words)",
+      "description": "2-3 sentence description of visual language and UX",
+      "design_philosophy": "Core design principles for this variant",
+      "preview": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "background": "oklch(...)",
+                  "font_heading": "Font family, fallbacks", "border_radius": "value"},
+      "proposed_tokens": {
+        "colors": {
+          "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
+          "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
+          "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
+          "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
+          "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
+        },
+        "typography": {
+          "font_family": {"heading": "...", "body": "...", "mono": "..."},
+          "font_size": {"xs": "...", "sm": "...", "base": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "...", "2xl": "...", "3xl": "...", "4xl": "..."},
+          "font_weight": {"normal": "400", "medium": "500", "semibold": "600", "bold": "700"},
+          "line_height": {"tight": "1.25", "normal": "1.5", "relaxed": "1.75"},
+          "letter_spacing": {"tight": "-0.025em", "normal": "0", "wide": "0.025em"}
+        },
+        "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", "2": "0.5rem", "3": "0.75rem", "4": "1rem",
+                    "5": "1.25rem", "6": "1.5rem", "8": "2rem", "10": "2.5rem", "12": "3rem",
+                    "16": "4rem", "20": "5rem", "24": "6rem"},
+        "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", "md": "0.5rem", "lg": "0.75rem",
+                          "xl": "1rem", "full": "9999px"},
+        "shadows": {"sm": "0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
+                    "md": "0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07)",
+                    "lg": "0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.10)",
+                    "xl": "0 20px 25px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.15)"},
+        "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", "md": "768px", "lg": "1024px", "xl": "1280px", "2xl": "1536px"}
+      }
+    }
+    // Repeat structure for variants_count total (variant-1, variant-2, ..., variant-n)
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Key Structural Requirements**:
+- Each variant MUST have complete, independent token proposals (all categories present)
+- All colors MUST use OKLCH format: `oklch(L C H / A)`
+- Token keys MUST match exactly across all variants for consistency
+- Variants differ in VALUES, not structure
+- Production-ready: no placeholders or incomplete sections
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **No images found**: Report glob pattern and suggest corrections
+- **Invalid prompt**: Require non-empty string for text mode
+- **Claude JSON parsing error**: Retry with stricter format instructions
+- **Invalid session**: Create standalone session automatically in `.workflow/.scratchpad/`
+- **Invalid variant count**: Clamp to 1-5 range and warn user
+
+## Key Features
+
+1. **🚀 AI-Driven Design Space Exploration** 🆕
+   - Phase 0.5: AI analyzes requirements and generates MAXIMALLY CONTRASTING design directions
+   - Uses 6-dimensional design attribute space (color saturation, visual weight, formality, organic/geometric, innovation, density)
+   - Ensures each variant occupies a distinct region of the design spectrum
+   - Generates search keywords and anti-patterns for each variant
+   - Provides contrast verification with minimum pairwise distance metrics
+
+2. **🎯 Variant-Specific Design Directions** 🆕
+   - AI generates search keywords and anti-patterns for each variant
+   - Each variant has distinct design philosophy (e.g., "minimal brutalist" vs "bold vibrant")
+   - Philosophy-specific keywords guide synthesis
+   - Design space analysis saved for consolidation phase
+   - Trend research deferred to consolidation for better integration
+
+3. **🔒 Maximum Contrast Guarantee**
+   - AI-driven divergence ensures variants are maximally distant in attribute space
+   - Each variant has distinct: philosophy, color saturation, visual weight, formality, etc.
+   - Explicit anti-patterns prevent variants from borrowing each other's characteristics
+   - Contrast verification built into design space analysis
+
+4. **100% Claude-Native Analysis**
+   - No external tools (gemini-wrapper, codex, or MCP) - pure Claude
+   - Single-pass comprehensive analysis guided by design space analysis
+   - Fast, deterministic style synthesis without external dependencies
+
+5. **Streamlined Output**
+   - Single file (`style-cards.json`) vs. multiple scattered files
+   - Eliminates `semantic_style_analysis.json`, `design-tokens.json`, `tailwind-tokens.js` clutter
+   - Each variant contains complete token proposals embedded
+
+6. **Flexible Input Modes**
+   - Image-only: Analyze visual references through each variant's philosophical lens
+   - Text-only: Generate from descriptions with maximum divergence
+   - Hybrid: Text guides image analysis while maintaining variant independence
+   - All modes enhanced with AI-driven design space analysis
+
+7. **Context-Aware & Dynamic**
+   - Extracts design keywords from user prompts (e.g., "minimalist", "Linear.app")
+   - Considers project type from brainstorming artifacts
+   - Dynamically generates design directions based on project context
+   - No hardcoded design philosophies - fully adaptive
+
+8. **Production-Ready Token Proposals**
+   - Complete design system proposals per variant
+   - OKLCH color format for perceptual uniformity and accessibility
+   - Semantic naming conventions
+   - WCAG AA accessibility considerations built-in
+   - Variant-specific token sets (not generic)
+
+9. **Workflow Integration**
+   - Integrated mode: Works within existing workflow sessions
+   - Standalone mode: Auto-creates session in scratchpad
+   - Context-aware: Can reference synthesis-specification.md or ui-designer/analysis.md
+   - Contrast metrics included in completion report
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- **Input**: Reference images (PNG, JPG, WebP) via glob patterns, or text prompts
+- **Output**: `style-cards.json` for `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate`
+- **Context**: Optional brainstorming artifacts (`synthesis-specification.md`, `ui-designer/analysis.md`)
+- **Auto Integration**: Automatically triggered by `/workflow:ui-design:auto` workflow
+- **Next Step**: `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {count} [--layout-variants <count>]` (add `--keep-separate` for matrix mode)

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/generate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,836 @@
+---
+name: generate
+description: Generate UI prototypes in matrix mode (style × layout combinations) for pages or components
+usage: /workflow:ui-design:generate [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
+argument-hint: "[--targets \"dashboard,auth,navbar,hero\"] [--target-type \"page\"] [--base-path \".workflow/WFS-xxx/design-run-xxx\"] [--style-variants 3] [--layout-variants 3]"
+parameters:
+  - name: --style-variants
+    type: number
+    default: 3
+    description: "Number of style variants to generate prototypes for (1-5). Auto-validates against actual style-* directories. ⚠️ Recommend omitting to use auto-detection."
+  - name: --layout-variants
+    type: number
+    default: auto-detected from layout-strategies.json
+    description: "Number of layout variants. Default: loaded from consolidation output. Can override for manual testing."
+  - name: --targets
+    type: string
+    description: "Comma-separated list of targets (pages or components) to generate"
+  - name: --target-type
+    type: string
+    default: page
+    description: "Type of targets: 'page' (full layout) or 'component' (isolated element)"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --base-path ".workflow/WFS-auth/design-run-20250109-143022" --targets "dashboard,settings" --target-type "page" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 3
+  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --session WFS-auth --targets "home,pricing" --target-type "page" --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 2
+  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --base-path "./.workflow/.design/run-20250109-150533"  # ✅ Recommended: auto-detect variants
+  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --targets "navbar,hero,card" --target-type "component" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 2
+  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --pages "home,dashboard" --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 2  # Legacy syntax
+executor: → @ui-design-agent
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# UI Generation Command (Matrix Mode)
+
+**Executor**: → @ui-design-agent
+**Parallel Generation**: Phase 2a → @ui-design-agent (L×T tasks)
+
+## Overview
+Generate production-ready UI prototypes (HTML/CSS) in `style × layout` matrix mode, strictly adhering to consolidated design tokens from separate style design systems. Supports both full-page layouts and isolated component generation.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Unified Generation**: Single mode generating `style_variants × layout_variants × targets` prototypes
+- **Target Types**: Supports pages (full layouts) and components (isolated UI elements)
+- **Agent-Driven**: Uses `Task(ui-design-agent)` for parallel generation
+- **Token-Driven**: All styles reference per-style design-tokens.json; no hardcoded values
+- **Production-Ready**: Semantic HTML5, ARIA attributes, responsive design
+- **Template-Based**: Decouples HTML structure from CSS styling for optimal performance
+- **Adaptive Wrapper**: Full-page structure for pages, minimal wrapper for components
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Path Resolution & Context Loading
+
+```bash
+# 1. Determine base path
+IF --base-path: base_path = {provided_base_path}
+ELSE IF --session: base_path = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/WFS-{session}/design-*")
+ELSE: base_path = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/.design/*")
+
+# 2. Determine style variant count and layout variant count
+style_variants = --style-variants OR 3; VALIDATE: 1 <= style_variants <= 5
+layout_variants = --layout-variants OR 3; VALIDATE: 1 <= layout_variants <= 5
+
+# Validate against actual style directories
+actual_style_count = count_directories({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-*)
+
+IF actual_style_count == 0:
+    ERROR: "No style directories found"; SUGGEST: "Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate first"; EXIT 1
+
+IF style_variants > actual_style_count:
+    WARN: "⚠️ Requested {style_variants}, but only {actual_style_count} exist"
+    REPORT: "   Available styles: {list_directories}"; style_variants = actual_style_count
+
+REPORT: "✅ Validated style variants: {style_variants}"
+
+# 3. Enhanced target list parsing with type detection
+target_list = []; target_type = "page"  # Default
+
+# Priority 1: Unified --targets parameter
+IF --targets:
+    raw_targets = {--targets value}
+    target_list = split_and_clean(raw_targets, delimiters=[",", ";", "、"])
+    target_list = [t.strip().lower().replace(" ", "-") for t in target_list if t.strip()]
+
+    target_type = --target-type provided ? {--target-type} : detect_target_type(target_list)
+    REPORT: "🎯 Using provided targets ({target_type}): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Priority 2: Legacy --pages parameter
+ELSE IF --pages:
+    raw_targets = {--pages value}
+    target_list = split_and_clean(raw_targets, delimiters=[",", ";", "、"])
+    target_list = [t.strip().lower().replace(" ", "-") for t in target_list if t.strip()]
+    target_type = "page"
+    REPORT: "📋 Using provided pages (legacy): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Priority 3: Extract from synthesis-specification.md
+ELSE IF --session:
+    synthesis_spec = Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
+    target_list = extract_targets_from_synthesis(synthesis_spec); target_type = "page"
+    REPORT: "📋 Extracted from synthesis: {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Priority 4: Detect from existing prototypes or default
+ELSE:
+    target_list = detect_from_prototypes({base_path}/prototypes/) OR ["home"]; target_type = "page"
+    REPORT: "📋 Detected/default targets: {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# 4. Validate target names
+validated_targets = [t for t in target_list if regex_match(t, r"^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9_-]*$")]
+invalid_targets = [t for t in target_list if t not in validated_targets]
+
+IF invalid_targets: REPORT: "⚠️ Skipped invalid target names: {', '.join(invalid_targets)}"
+VALIDATE: validated_targets not empty, "No valid targets found"
+target_list = validated_targets
+
+STORE: target_list, target_type
+
+# 5. Verify design systems exist
+FOR style_id IN range(1, style_variants + 1):
+    VERIFY: exists({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json)
+    VERIFY: exists({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/style-guide.md)
+
+# 6. Load requirements (if integrated mode)
+IF --session: synthesis_spec = Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
+```
+
+### Phase 1.5: Target-Specific Layout Planning
+
+```bash
+REPORT: "📐 Planning {layout_variants} layout strategies for each target..."
+
+CREATE: {base_path}/prototypes/_templates/
+
+# For each target, plan its specific layouts
+FOR target IN target_list:
+    REPORT: "  Planning layouts for '{target}' ({target_type})..."
+
+    FOR layout_id IN range(1, layout_variants + 1):
+        Task(ui-design-agent): "
+          [TARGET_LAYOUT_PLANNING]
+
+          Generate a concrete, actionable layout plan for a specific target and WRITE it to the file system.
+
+          ## Context
+          TARGET: {target}
+          TARGET_TYPE: {target_type}
+          LAYOUT_ID: {layout_id}
+          BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+          {IF --session: PROJECT_REQUIREMENTS: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)}
+
+          ## Task
+          Research, design, and WRITE a modern, innovative layout plan specifically for '{target}'.
+
+          ## Research Phase (Use MCP Tools)
+          1. Search for modern {target_type} layout patterns:
+             mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+               query=\"modern {target} {target_type} layout design patterns 2024 2025\",
+               tokensNum=\"dynamic\"
+             )
+          2. Search for {target}-specific UI best practices
+
+          ## Layout Planning Rules
+
+          **For PAGES (target_type='page')**:
+          - Define macro-layout: main regions (header, sidebar, main, footer)
+          - Specify grid/flexbox structure for content organization
+          - Define responsive breakpoints and behavior
+          - Include navigation and page-level components
+
+          **For COMPONENTS (target_type='component')**:
+          - Define micro-layout: internal element arrangement
+          - Specify alignment, spacing, and element sizing
+          - Focus on component-specific structure (no header/footer)
+          - Optimize for reusability and composition
+
+          ## File Write Instructions
+          Generate layout plan JSON and WRITE it using Write() tool:
+
+          **Path**: {base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.json
+
+          **Content** - JSON with this EXACT structure:
+          ```json
+          {
+            \"id\": \"layout-{layout_id}\",
+            \"target\": \"{target}\",
+            \"target_type\": \"{target_type}\",
+            \"name\": \"Descriptive name (2-4 words)\",
+            \"description\": \"Detailed description (2-3 sentences explaining structure, use cases, and unique aspects)\",
+            \"structure\": {
+              // For pages, include:
+              \"type\": \"sidebar-main\" | \"centered\" | \"asymmetric\" | \"grid-dashboard\",
+              \"regions\": [\"header\", \"sidebar\", \"main\", \"footer\"],
+              \"grid\": {
+                \"columns\": 12,
+                \"rows\": \"auto\",
+                \"gap\": \"var(--spacing-6)\"
+              },
+              \"sidebar\": {
+                \"position\": \"left\" | \"right\",
+                \"width\": \"250px\",
+                \"fixed\": true,
+                \"collapsible\": true
+              },
+              \"responsive\": {
+                \"mobile\": {\"columns\": 1, \"sidebar\": \"hidden\"},
+                \"tablet\": {\"columns\": 6, \"sidebar\": \"overlay\"},
+                \"desktop\": {\"columns\": 12, \"sidebar\": \"fixed\"}
+              },
+
+              // For components, include:
+              \"arrangement\": \"flex-column\" | \"flex-row\" | \"grid\",
+              \"alignment\": \"center\" | \"start\" | \"end\" | \"stretch\",
+              \"spacing\": \"compact\" | \"normal\" | \"relaxed\",
+              \"element_order\": [\"icon\", \"title\", \"description\", \"action\"]
+            },
+            \"semantic_hints\": [
+              \"dashboard\",
+              \"data-visualization\",
+              \"navigation-sidebar\",
+              \"card-based\"
+            ],
+            \"accessibility_features\": [
+              \"skip-navigation\",
+              \"landmark-regions\",
+              \"keyboard-navigation\",
+              \"screen-reader-optimized\"
+            ],
+            \"research_references\": [
+              \"URL or description of research source 1\",
+              \"URL or description of research source 2\"
+            ]
+          }
+          ```
+
+          ## Write Operation Instructions
+          - Use Write() tool with the absolute path provided above
+          - Create directory if needed: Bash('mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes/_templates')
+          - Verify write operation succeeds
+
+          ## Example Write Operation
+          ```javascript
+          Write(\"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.json\", JSON.stringify(layout_plan, null, 2))
+          ```
+
+          ## Completion
+          Report successful file creation with path confirmation.
+
+          ## Critical Requirements
+          - ✅ Layout plan is ONLY for '{target}' - tailor to this specific target's needs
+          - ✅ Consider {target_type} type (page vs component) when designing structure
+          - ✅ Research modern patterns using MCP tools before designing
+          - ✅ Provide concrete, implementable structure (not abstract descriptions)
+          - ✅ Different layout IDs should explore meaningfully different approaches
+          - ✅ Use semantic naming and clear documentation
+          - ✅ Write file directly using Write() tool - do NOT return contents as text
+        "
+
+# Wait for all agent tasks to complete
+REPORT: "⏳ Waiting for layout planning agents to complete..."
+
+# Verify agent created layout JSON files
+REPORT: "📝 Verifying agent file creation..."
+
+FOR target IN target_list:
+    FOR layout_id IN range(1, layout_variants + 1):
+        layout_json_label = f"{target}-layout-{layout_id}.json"
+        json_path = f"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{layout_json_label}"
+
+        # Verify file exists
+        VERIFY: exists(json_path), f"Layout JSON not created by agent: {layout_json_label}"
+
+        # Validate JSON structure
+        TRY:
+            layout_json_content = Read(json_path)
+            layout_plan = JSON.parse(layout_json_content)
+
+            # Validate required fields
+            VALIDATE: layout_plan.id == f"layout-{layout_id}", f"Invalid layout ID in {layout_json_label}"
+            VALIDATE: layout_plan.target == target, f"Invalid target in {layout_json_label}"
+            VALIDATE: layout_plan.target_type == target_type, f"Invalid target_type in {layout_json_label}"
+            VALIDATE: layout_plan.name exists, f"Missing 'name' field in {layout_json_label}"
+            VALIDATE: layout_plan.structure exists, f"Missing 'structure' field in {layout_json_label}"
+
+            file_size = get_file_size(json_path)
+            REPORT: f"   ✓ Verified: {layout_json_label} - {layout_plan.name} ({file_size} KB)"
+        CATCH error:
+            ERROR: f"Validation failed for {layout_json_label}: {error}"
+            REPORT: f"   ⚠️ File exists but validation failed - review agent output"
+
+REPORT: f"✅ Phase 1.5 complete: Verified {len(target_list) × layout_variants} target-specific layout files"
+```
+
+### Phase 1.6: Token Variable Name Extraction
+
+```bash
+REPORT: "📋 Extracting design token variable names..."
+tokens_json_path = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json"
+VERIFY: exists(tokens_json_path), "Design tokens not found. Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate first."
+
+design_tokens = Read(tokens_json_path)
+
+# Extract all available token categories and variable names
+token_reference = {
+  "colors": {"brand": list(keys), "surface": list(keys), "semantic": list(keys), "text": list(keys), "border": list(keys)},
+  "typography": {"font_family": list(keys), "font_size": list(keys), "font_weight": list(keys), "line_height": list(keys), "letter_spacing": list(keys)},
+  "spacing": list(keys), "border_radius": list(keys), "shadows": list(keys), "breakpoints": list(keys)
+}
+
+# Generate complete variable name lists for Agent prompt
+color_vars = []; FOR category, keys: FOR key: color_vars.append(f"--color-{category}-{key}")
+typography_vars = []; FOR category, keys: FOR key: typography_vars.append(f"--{category.replace('_', '-')}-{key}")
+spacing_vars = [f"--spacing-{key}" for key in token_reference.spacing]
+radius_vars = [f"--border-radius-{key}" for key in token_reference.border_radius]
+shadow_vars = [f"--shadow-{key}" for key in token_reference.shadows]
+breakpoint_vars = [f"--breakpoint-{key}" for key in token_reference.breakpoints]
+
+all_token_vars = color_vars + typography_vars + spacing_vars + radius_vars + shadow_vars + breakpoint_vars
+
+REPORT: f"✅ Extracted {len(all_token_vars)} design token variables from design-tokens.json"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Optimized Matrix UI Generation
+
+**Strategy**: Two-layer generation reduces complexity from `O(S×L×T)` to `O(L×T)`, achieving **`S` times faster** performance.
+
+- **Layer 1**: Generate `L × T` layout templates (HTML structure + structural CSS) by agent
+- **Layer 2**: Instantiate `S × L × T` final prototypes via fast file operations
+
+#### Phase 2a: Layout Template Generation
+
+**Parallel Executor**: → @ui-design-agent
+
+```bash
+CREATE: {base_path}/prototypes/_templates/
+CREATE: {base_path}/prototypes/
+
+# Launch parallel template generation tasks → @ui-design-agent
+# Total agent tasks: layout_variants × len(target_list)
+FOR layout_id IN range(1, layout_variants + 1):
+    FOR target IN target_list:
+        # Read the target-specific layout plan
+        layout_json_path = f"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.json"
+        layout_plan = Read(layout_json_path)
+
+        Task(ui-design-agent): "
+          [UI_LAYOUT_TEMPLATE_GENERATION]
+
+          🚨 **CRITICAL: TARGET INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENT** 🚨
+          You are generating a template for EXACTLY ONE target: '{target}'.
+          - Do NOT include content from other targets in the workflow
+          - This template is for '{target}' ONLY - treat it as a standalone UI entity
+          - Even if '{target}' might coexist with other targets in a final application,
+            your task is to create an INDEPENDENT, REUSABLE template for '{target}' alone
+
+          Generate a **style-agnostic** layout template for a specific {target_type} and layout strategy.
+
+          🎯 **CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS**:
+          ✅ **ADAPTIVE**: Multi-device responsive design (mobile, tablet, desktop)
+          ✅ **STYLE-SWITCHABLE**: Support runtime theme/style switching via CSS variables
+          ✅ **TOKEN-DRIVEN**: 100% CSS variable usage, zero hardcoded values
+          ✅ **INDEPENDENT**: Template for '{target}' only, no other targets included
+          ✅ **RESEARCH-INFORMED**: Use MCP tools to research modern UI patterns as needed
+
+          ## Context
+          LAYOUT_ID: {layout_id} | TARGET: {target} | TARGET_TYPE: {target_type}
+          BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+          {IF --session: Requirements: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md}
+
+          **Target Type Details**:
+          {IF target_type == "page":
+            - Type: Full-page layout | Wrapper: Complete HTML document (<html>, <head>, <body>)
+            - Navigation: Include header/navigation | Footer: Include page footer
+            - Content: Complete page content structure
+          }
+          {ELSE IF target_type == "component":
+            - Type: Isolated UI component | Wrapper: Minimal container for demonstration
+            - Navigation: Exclude header/footer | Container: Simple wrapper (e.g., <div class=\"component-container\">)
+            - Content: Focus solely on component design
+          }
+
+          ## Task
+          Generate TWO files that work together as a reusable template.
+
+          ### File 1: HTML Template (`{target}-layout-{layout_id}.html`)
+
+          **Structure Requirements**:
+          - Semantic HTML5 elements with ARIA attributes
+          - Complete {target_type} wrapper (full document for pages, minimal for components)
+          - Zero hardcoded styles, colors, or spacing
+          - Responsive structure ready for mobile/tablet/desktop
+
+          **⚠️ CRITICAL: CSS Placeholder Links**
+
+          You MUST include these EXACT placeholder links in the `<head>` section:
+
+          ```html
+          <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{STRUCTURAL_CSS}}\">
+          <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{TOKEN_CSS}}\">
+          ```
+
+          **Placeholder Rules**:
+          1. Use EXACTLY `{{STRUCTURAL_CSS}}` and `{{TOKEN_CSS}}` with double curly braces
+          2. Place in `<head>` AFTER `<meta>` tags, BEFORE `</head>` closing tag
+          3. DO NOT substitute with actual paths - the script handles this
+          4. DO NOT add any other CSS `<link>` tags
+          5. These enable runtime style switching for all variants
+
+          **Complete HTML Template Examples**:
+
+          {IF target_type == \"page\":
+          ```html
+          <!DOCTYPE html>
+          <html lang=\"en\">
+          <head>
+            <meta charset=\"UTF-8\">
+            <meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0\">
+            <title>{target} - Layout {layout_id}</title>
+            <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{STRUCTURAL_CSS}}\">
+            <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{TOKEN_CSS}}\">
+          </head>
+          <body>
+            <header><nav aria-label=\"Main navigation\"><!-- Nav content --></nav></header>
+            <main><!-- Page content --></main>
+            <footer><!-- Footer content --></footer>
+          </body>
+          </html>
+          ```
+          }
+
+          {ELSE IF target_type == \"component\":
+          ```html
+          <!DOCTYPE html>
+          <html lang=\"en\">
+          <head>
+            <meta charset=\"UTF-8\">
+            <meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0\">
+            <title>{target} Component - Layout {layout_id}</title>
+            <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{STRUCTURAL_CSS}}\">
+            <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"{{TOKEN_CSS}}\">
+          </head>
+          <body>
+            <div class=\"component-container\">
+              <!-- Component content only -->
+            </div>
+          </body>
+          </html>
+          ```
+          }
+
+          ### File 2: CSS Template (`{target}-layout-{layout_id}.css`)
+          - 🎨 **TOKEN-DRIVEN STYLING**: ALL values use `var()` for dynamic theme switching
+          - 🔄 **RUNTIME SWITCHABLE**: `background-color: var(--color-surface-background);`
+          - 🚫 **ZERO LITERALS**: NO hardcoded values (#4F46E5, 16px, Arial)
+          - 📐 **SEMANTIC NAMING**: BEM or descriptive class naming
+          - 📱 **MOBILE-FIRST**: Responsive design using token-based breakpoints
+          - {IF target_type == "component": "Focus styles on component only, minimal global styles"}
+
+          ## Layout Plan (Target-Specific)
+          Implement the following pre-defined layout plan for this target:
+
+          **Layout JSON Path**: {layout_json_path}
+          **Layout Plan**:
+          ```json
+          {JSON.stringify(layout_plan, null, 2)}
+          ```
+
+          **Critical**: Your job is to IMPLEMENT this exact layout plan, not to redesign it.
+          - Follow the structure defined in the 'structure' field
+          - Use semantic hints for appropriate HTML elements
+          - Respect the target_type (page vs component) wrapper requirements
+          - Apply the specified responsive behavior
+
+          ## Token Usage Requirements (STRICT - USE EXACT NAMES)
+
+          **CRITICAL**: You MUST use ONLY the variable names listed below.
+          DO NOT invent variable names like --color-background-base, --radius-md, --transition-base, etc.
+
+          **Available Variables** ({len(all_token_vars)} total):
+          - Color variables ({len(color_vars)}): --color-brand-primary, --color-surface-background, --color-text-primary, etc.
+          - Typography variables ({len(typography_vars)}): --font-family-heading, --font-size-base, --font-weight-bold, etc.
+          - Spacing variables ({len(spacing_vars)}): --spacing-0, --spacing-1, ..., --spacing-24
+          - Border radius ({len(radius_vars)}): --border-radius-none, --border-radius-sm, ..., --border-radius-full
+          - Shadows ({len(shadow_vars)}): --shadow-sm, --shadow-md, --shadow-lg, --shadow-xl
+          - Breakpoints ({len(breakpoint_vars)}): --breakpoint-sm, --breakpoint-md, --breakpoint-lg, etc.
+
+          **STRICT RULES**:
+          1. Use ONLY the variables listed above - NO custom variable names
+          2. If you need a value not in the list, use the closest semantic match
+          3. For missing tokens (like transitions), use literal CSS values: `transition: all 0.2s ease;`
+          4. NO hardcoded colors, fonts, or spacing (e.g., #4F46E5, 16px, Arial)
+          5. All `var()` references must match exact variable names above
+
+          ## File Write Instructions
+          Generate TWO template files and WRITE them using Write() tool:
+
+          ### File 1: HTML Template
+          **Path**: {base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.html
+          **Content**: Reusable HTML structure with CSS placeholders
+
+          ### File 2: CSS Template
+          **Path**: {base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.css
+          **Content**: Structural CSS using var() for all values
+
+          ## Write Operation Instructions
+          - Use Write() tool for both files with absolute paths provided above
+          - Create directory if needed: Bash('mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes/_templates')
+          - Verify each write operation succeeds
+
+          ## Example Write Operations
+          ```javascript
+          Write(\"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.html\", html_content)
+          Write(\"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{target}-layout-{layout_id}.css\", css_content)
+          ```
+
+          ## Completion
+          Report successful file creation for both HTML and CSS templates with path confirmation.
+
+          🎯 **CRITICAL QUALITY GATES**:
+          ✅ **ADAPTIVE**: Works on mobile (375px), tablet (768px), desktop (1024px+)
+          ✅ **STYLE-SWITCHABLE**: Change {{TOKEN_CSS}} link → instant theme switching
+          ✅ **TOKEN-ONLY**: 100% var() usage, inspectable with \"Search for: #|px|rem\" → 0 matches in values
+          ✅ **REUSABLE**: Same HTML/CSS structure works for ALL style variants
+          ✅ **FILE-WRITTEN**: Files written directly to file system, not returned as text
+
+          **Wrapper Strategy**:
+          {IF target_type == "page": Use complete HTML document structure with navigation and footer.}
+          {ELSE: Use minimal wrapper with component container only.}
+
+          DO NOT return file contents as text - write them directly using Write() tool.
+        "
+
+REPORT: "⏳ Phase 2a: Waiting for agents to complete template generation..."
+```
+
+#### Phase 2a.5: Verify Agent Template File Creation
+
+```bash
+REPORT: "📝 Phase 2a.5: Verifying agent template file creation..."
+
+# Verify each agent created template files
+FOR layout_id IN range(1, layout_variants + 1):
+    FOR target IN target_list:
+        html_label = f"{target}-layout-{layout_id}.html"
+        css_label = f"{target}-layout-{layout_id}.css"
+
+        html_path = f"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{html_label}"
+        css_path = f"{base_path}/prototypes/_templates/{css_label}"
+
+        # Verify files exist
+        VERIFY: exists(html_path), f"HTML template not created by agent: {html_label}"
+        VERIFY: exists(css_path), f"CSS template not created by agent: {css_label}"
+
+        # Validate content
+        TRY:
+            html_content = Read(html_path)
+            css_content = Read(css_path)
+
+            # Basic validation checks
+            VALIDATE: len(html_content) > 100, f"HTML template too short: {html_label}"
+            VALIDATE: len(css_content) > 50, f"CSS template too short: {css_label}"
+            VALIDATE: "<!DOCTYPE html>" in html_content OR "<div" in html_content, f"Invalid HTML structure: {html_label}"
+            VALIDATE: "var(--" in css_content, f"Missing CSS variables: {css_label}"
+
+            html_size = get_file_size(html_path)
+            css_size = get_file_size(css_path)
+            REPORT: f"   ✓ Verified: {html_label} ({html_size} KB) + {css_label} ({css_size} KB)"
+        CATCH error:
+            ERROR: f"Validation failed for {target}-layout-{layout_id}: {error}"
+            REPORT: f"   ⚠️ Files exist but validation failed - review agent output"
+
+REPORT: "✅ Phase 2a.5 complete: Verified {layout_variants * len(target_list) * 2} template files"
+```
+
+#### Phase 2b: Prototype Instantiation
+
+```bash
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 2b: Instantiating prototypes from templates..."
+
+# Step 1: Convert design tokens to CSS for each style
+REPORT: "   Converting design tokens to CSS variables..."
+
+# Check for jq dependency
+IF NOT command_exists("jq"):
+    ERROR: "jq is not installed or not in PATH. The conversion script requires jq."
+    REPORT: "Please install jq: macOS: brew install jq | Linux: apt-get install jq | Windows: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/download/"
+    EXIT 1
+
+# Convert design tokens to CSS for each style variant
+FOR style_id IN range(1, style_variants + 1):
+    tokens_json_path = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-${style_id}/design-tokens.json"
+    tokens_css_path = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-${style_id}/tokens.css"
+    script_path = "~/.claude/scripts/convert_tokens_to_css.sh"
+
+    # Verify input file exists
+    IF NOT exists(tokens_json_path): REPORT: "   ✗ ERROR: Input file not found"; CONTINUE
+
+    # Execute conversion: cat input.json | script.sh > output.css
+    Bash(cat "${tokens_json_path}" | "${script_path}" > "${tokens_css_path}")
+
+    # Verify output was generated
+    IF exit_code == 0 AND exists(tokens_css_path):
+        REPORT: "   ✓ Generated tokens.css for style-${style_id}"
+    ELSE:
+        REPORT: "   ✗ ERROR: Failed to generate tokens.css for style-${style_id}"
+
+# Step 2: Use ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh script for instantiation
+prototypes_dir = "{base_path}/prototypes"; targets_csv = ','.join(target_list)
+session_id = --session provided ? {session_id} : "standalone"
+
+# Execute instantiation script with target type
+Bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh "{prototypes_dir}" --session-id "{session_id}" --mode "{target_type}")
+
+# The script auto-detects: Targets, Style variants, Layout variants
+# The script generates:
+# 1. S × L × T HTML prototypes with CSS links
+# 2. Implementation notes for each prototype
+# 3. compare.html (interactive matrix)
+# 4. index.html (navigation page)
+# 5. PREVIEW.md (documentation)
+
+REPORT: "✅ Phase 2b complete: Instantiated {style_variants * layout_variants * len(target_list)} final prototypes"
+REPORT: "   Mode: {target_type} | Performance: {style_variants}× faster than original approach"
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Verify Preview Files
+
+```bash
+REPORT: "🔍 Phase 3: Verifying preview files..."
+
+expected_files = ["{base_path}/prototypes/compare.html", "{base_path}/prototypes/index.html", "{base_path}/prototypes/PREVIEW.md"]
+
+all_present = true
+FOR file_path IN expected_files:
+    IF exists(file_path): REPORT: "   ✓ Found: {basename(file_path)}"
+    ELSE: REPORT: "   ✗ Missing: {basename(file_path)}"; all_present = false
+
+IF all_present: REPORT: "✅ Phase 3 complete: All preview files verified"
+ELSE: WARN: "⚠️ Some preview files missing - script may have failed"
+
+# Optional: Generate fallback design-tokens.css for reference
+fallback_css_path = "{base_path}/prototypes/design-tokens.css"
+IF NOT exists(fallback_css_path):
+    Write(fallback_css_path, "/* Auto-generated fallback CSS custom properties */\n/* See style-consolidation/style-{n}/tokens.css for actual values */")
+    REPORT: "   ✓ Generated fallback design-tokens.css"
+```
+
+### Phase 3.5: Cross-Target Consistency Validation
+
+**Condition**: Only executes if `len(target_list) > 1 AND target_type == "page"`
+
+```bash
+# Skip if single target or component mode
+IF len(target_list) <= 1 OR target_type == "component": SKIP to Phase 4
+
+# For multi-page workflows, validate cross-page consistency → @ui-design-agent
+FOR style_id IN range(1, style_variants + 1):
+    FOR layout_id IN range(1, layout_variants + 1):
+        Task(@ui-design-agent): "
+          [CROSS_PAGE_CONSISTENCY_VALIDATION]
+
+          Validate design consistency across multiple {target_type}s for Style-{style_id} Layout-{layout_id}
+
+          🎯 **VALIDATION FOCUS**:
+          ✅ **ADAPTIVE CONSISTENCY**: Same responsive behavior across all pages
+          ✅ **STYLE-SWITCHING**: Verify token references enable uniform theme switching
+          ✅ **CROSS-PAGE HARMONY**: Shared components use identical CSS variables
+
+          ## Context
+          STYLE_ID: {style_id} | LAYOUT_ID: {layout_id} | TARGETS: {target_list} | TARGET_TYPE: {target_type}
+          BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+
+          ## Input Files
+          FOR each target: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html/css
+
+          ## Validation Tasks
+          1. **Shared Component Consistency**: Check header/nav/footer structure matches
+          2. **Token Usage Consistency**: Verify same design-tokens file, no hardcoded values
+          3. **Accessibility Consistency**: ARIA attributes, heading hierarchy, landmark roles
+          4. **Layout Strategy Adherence**: Layout-{layout_id} strategy applied consistently
+
+          ## Output
+          Generate consistency report markdown file at:
+          {base_path}/prototypes/consistency-report-s{style_id}-l{layout_id}.md
+
+          Include validation results, issues found, and recommendations.
+          Focus on truly shared elements. Page-specific content variations are acceptable.
+        "
+
+# Aggregate consistency reports
+Write({base_path}/prototypes/CONSISTENCY_SUMMARY.md):
+# Multi-{target_type.capitalize()} Consistency Summary
+
+## Validated Combinations
+- Style Variants: {style_variants} | Layout Variants: {layout_variants}
+- Total Reports: {style_variants * layout_variants}
+
+## Report Files
+{FOR s, l: - [Style {s} Layout {l}](./consistency-report-s{s}-l{l}.md)}
+
+Run `/workflow:ui-design:update` once all issues are resolved.
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Completion
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {content: "Resolve paths and load design systems", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading design systems"},
+  {content: `Plan ${target_list.length}×${layout_variants} target-specific layouts`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Planning layouts"},
+  {content: "Extract design token variable names", status: "completed", activeForm: "Extracting token variables"},
+  {content: `Generate ${layout_variants}×${target_list.length} layout templates using target-specific plans`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating templates"},
+  {content: "Convert design tokens to CSS variables", status: "completed", activeForm: "Converting tokens"},
+  {content: `Instantiate ${style_variants}×${layout_variants}×${target_list.length} prototypes using script`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Running script"},
+  {content: "Verify preview files generation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Verifying files"}
+]});
+```
+
+**Completion Message**:
+```
+✅ Optimized Matrix UI generation complete!
+
+Configuration:
+- Style Variants: {style_variants}
+- Layout Variants: {layout_variants} (target-specific planning)
+- Target Type: {target_type_icon} {target_type}
+- Targets: {target_list}
+- Total Prototypes: {style_variants * layout_variants * len(target_list)}
+- Layout Plans: {len(target_list) × layout_variants} target-specific JSON files generated
+
+Performance Metrics:
+- Layout Templates Generated: {layout_variants * len(target_list)} (Agent tasks)
+- Prototypes Instantiated: {style_variants * layout_variants * len(target_list)} (script-based)
+- Preview Files: compare.html, index.html, PREVIEW.md (auto-generated)
+- Speed Improvement: {style_variants}× faster than previous approach
+- Resource Efficiency: {100 * (1 - 1/style_variants)}% reduction in Agent calls
+- Script: ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh v3.0 with auto-detection
+
+Generated Structure:
+📂 {base_path}/prototypes/
+├── _templates/
+│   ├── {target}-layout-{l}.json ({len(target_list) × layout_variants} layout plans)
+│   ├── {target}-layout-{l}.html ({layout_variants * len(target_list)} HTML templates)
+│   └── {target}-layout-{l}.css ({layout_variants * len(target_list)} CSS templates)
+├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html ({style_variants * layout_variants * len(target_list)} final prototypes)
+├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}-notes.md
+├── compare.html (interactive matrix visualization)
+└── index.html (quick navigation)
+
+🌐 Interactive Preview:
+1. Matrix View: Open compare.html (recommended)
+2. Quick Index: Open index.html
+3. Instructions: See PREVIEW.md
+
+{IF target_type == "component": Note: Components are rendered with minimal wrapper for isolated comparison.}
+
+Next: /workflow:ui-design:update {--session flag if applicable}
+
+Note: When called from /workflow:ui-design:auto, design-update is triggered automatically.
+
+**Dynamic Values**: target_type_icon: "📄" for page, "🧩" for component
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+{base_path}/prototypes/
+├── _templates/                            # Target-specific layout plans and templates
+│   ├── {target}-layout-1.json            # Layout plan JSON (target-specific)
+│   ├── {target}-layout-1.html            # Style-agnostic HTML structure
+│   ├── {target}-layout-1.css             # Structural CSS with var() references
+│   └── ... (T × L layout plans + templates)
+├── compare.html                           # Interactive matrix visualization
+├── index.html                             # Simple navigation page
+├── PREVIEW.md                             # Preview instructions
+├── design-tokens.css                      # CSS custom properties fallback
+├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html    # Final prototypes (copied from templates)
+├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}-notes.md  # Implementation notes
+└── ... (S × L × T total final files)
+
+{base_path}/style-consolidation/
+├── style-1/ (design-tokens.json, tokens.css, style-guide.md)
+├── style-2/ (same structure)
+└── ...
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Pre-execution Checks
+- **No design systems found**: Error - Run `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` first
+- **Invalid target names**: Extract from synthesis-specification.md or error with validation message
+- **Missing templates directory**: Auto-created in Phase 1.5
+- **Unsupported target type**: Error if target_type not in ["page", "component"]
+- **Layout planning failures**: Check Phase 1.5 agent outputs for errors
+
+### Phase-Specific Errors
+- **Agent execution errors (Phase 2a)**: Report details, suggest retry with specific phase
+- **Token conversion errors (Phase 2b)**: Check design-tokens.json format, validate JSON schema
+- **Script execution errors (Phase 2b)**: Check script exists, permissions, output for specific errors
+- **Preview generation errors (Phase 3)**: Check script completed, verify template exists, review Phase 2b output
+
+### Recovery Strategies
+- **Partial failure**: Script reports generated vs failed counts - review logs
+- **Missing templates**: Indicates Phase 2a issue - regenerate templates
+- **Auto-detection failures**: Use manual mode with explicit parameters
+- **Permission errors**: Run `chmod +x ~/.claude/scripts/ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh`
+
+## Quality Checks
+
+After generation, ensure:
+- [ ] All CSS values reference design token custom properties
+- [ ] No hardcoded colors, spacing, or typography
+- [ ] Semantic HTML structure with proper element hierarchy
+- [ ] ARIA attributes present for accessibility
+- [ ] Responsive design implemented with mobile-first approach
+- [ ] File naming follows `{target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}` convention
+- [ ] compare.html loads correctly with all prototypes
+- [ ] Template files are reusable and style-agnostic
+- [ ] Appropriate wrapper used (full-page for pages, minimal for components)
+
+## Key Features
+
+1. **Target-Specific Layout Planning** 🆕 - Each target gets custom-designed layouts; Agent researches modern patterns using MCP tools; Layout plans saved as structured JSON
+2. **Unified Target Generation** - Supports both pages (full layouts) and components (isolated elements); Backward compatible with legacy `--pages` parameter
+3. **Optimized Template-Based Architecture** - Generates `L × T` reusable templates plus `L × T` layout plans; **`S` times faster**
+4. **Three-Layer Generation Strategy** - Layer 1: Layout planning (target-specific); Layer 2: Template generation (implements plans); Layer 3: Fast instantiation; Agent autonomously uses MCP tools
+5. **Script-Based Instantiation (v3.0)** - Uses `ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh` for efficient file operations; Auto-detection; Robust error handling; Integrated preview generation; Supports both page and component modes
+6. **Consistent Cross-Style Layouts** - Same layout structure applied uniformly; Easier to compare styles; Simplified maintenance
+7. **Dynamic Style Injection** - CSS custom properties enable runtime style switching; Each style variant has its own `tokens.css` file
+8. **Interactive Visualization** - Full-featured compare.html; Matrix grid view with synchronized scrolling; Enhanced index.html with statistics; Comprehensive PREVIEW.md
+9. **Production-Ready Output** - Semantic HTML5 and ARIA attributes (WCAG 2.2); Mobile-first responsive design; Token-driven styling; Implementation notes
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- **Input**: Per-style `design-tokens.json` from `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate`; `--targets` and `--layout-variants` parameters; Optional: `synthesis-specification.md` for target requirements; Target type specification
+- **Output**: Target-specific `layout-{n}.json` files; Matrix HTML/CSS prototypes for `/workflow:ui-design:update`
+- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/_template-compare-matrix.html` (global)
+- **Auto Integration**: Automatically triggered by `/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto` workflow
+- **Key Change**: Layout planning moved from consolidate to generate phase; Each target gets custom-designed layouts
+- **Backward Compatibility**: Legacy `--pages` parameter continues to work

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/imitate-auto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
+---
+name: imitate-auto
+description: Imitation-focused UI design workflow - Rapidly replicate a single design style from URL or images (skip exploration, direct to implementation)
+usage: /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto [--url "<url>"] [--images "<glob>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--session <id>]
+argument-hint: "[--url \"https://example.com\"] [--images \"refs/*.png\"] [--prompt \"Imitate dark mode style\"] [--targets \"dashboard,settings\"] [--target-type \"page\"]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://linear.app" --targets "home,features,pricing"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --images "refs/design.png" --prompt "Imitate this minimalist design for dashboard and settings"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://stripe.com" --session WFS-payment
+  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --images "refs/*.png" --targets "home"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://example.com" --targets "navbar,hero" --target-type "component"
+  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --images "refs/*.png" --pages "home"  # Legacy syntax
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# UI Design Imitate-Auto Workflow Command
+
+## Overview & Philosophy
+
+**Fast-track UI imitation workflow**: Replicates a single design style from reference source (URL or images), bypassing exploration and consolidation phases for maximum speed (~2-3× faster than explore-auto).
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Imitation over Exploration**: Focus on replicating specific design, not generating variants
+- **Single Mode**: Always 1 style × 1 layout × N pages
+- **Speed Optimized**: Bypasses `consolidate` step via direct token extraction
+- **Reference-Driven**: Requires URL or images as primary input
+- **Auto-Screenshot**: Supports Playwright/Chrome with manual upload fallback
+
+**Streamlined Flow**:
+1. User triggers → Phase 0 (initialization) → Phase 0.5 (screenshot capture) → Phase 1 (style extraction) → Phase 2 (token adaptation) → Phase 3 (prototype generation) → Phase 4 (integration) → Complete
+
+**Performance**: ~2-3× faster than explore-auto for single-style scenarios
+
+**Ideal For**: MVP development, high-fidelity prototyping, design replication, studying successful patterns
+**Not For**: Design exploration, generating multiple alternatives, novel design creation
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: TodoWrite initialization → Phase 0 execution
+2. **No Multi-Variant**: Always 1 style × 1 layout × N pages
+3. **Reference Required**: Must provide `--url` OR `--images`
+4. **Auto-Continue**: Automatic phase progression without pausing
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after each phase
+
+## Parameter Requirements
+
+**Required** (at least one):
+- `--url "<url>"`: Website URL to imitate (e.g., "https://linear.app")
+- `--images "<glob>"`: Local reference images (e.g., "refs/*.png")
+
+**Optional**:
+- `--targets "<list>"`: Comma-separated targets (pages/components) to generate (inferred from prompt if omitted)
+- `--target-type "page|component"`: Explicitly set target type (default: intelligent detection)
+- `--session <id>"`: Workflow session ID (standalone if omitted)
+- `--prompt "<desc>"`: Additional design guidance (e.g., "Focus on dark mode")
+
+**Legacy Parameters** (maintained for backward compatibility):
+- `--pages "<list>"`: Alias for `--targets` with `--target-type page`
+
+**Not Supported**:
+- `--style-variants`: Always 1 (single style)
+- `--layout-variants`: Always 1 (single layout)
+- `--batch-plan`: Not supported in imitate mode
+
+## 5-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 0: Simplified Initialization
+```bash
+# Generate run ID and determine base path
+run_id = "run-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
+
+IF --session:
+    base_path = ".workflow/WFS-{session_id}/design-${run_id}"
+ELSE:
+    base_path = ".workflow/.design/${run_id}"
+
+# Create directories (simpler than explore-auto)
+Bash(mkdir -p "${base_path}/{style-extraction,style-consolidation/style-1,prototypes}")
+
+# Initialize metadata
+Write({base_path}/.run-metadata.json): {
+  "run_id": "${run_id}",
+  "session_id": "${session_id}",
+  "timestamp": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)",
+  "workflow": "ui-design:imitate-auto",
+  "mode": "single_style_imitation",
+  "parameters": {
+    "url": "${url_value}",
+    "images": "${images_pattern}",
+    "pages": "${inferred_page_list}",
+    "prompt": "${prompt_text}"
+  },
+  "status": "in_progress"
+}
+
+# Unified target inference (simplified for imitate mode, no interactive confirmation)
+target_list = []
+target_type = "page"  # Default to page for imitate mode
+target_source = "none"
+
+# Step 1: Handle legacy --pages parameter (backward compatibility)
+IF --pages provided:
+    target_list = split_and_clean({--pages value}, [",", ";", "、"])
+    target_type = "page"
+    target_source = "explicit_legacy"
+    REPORT: "📋 Using explicitly provided pages (legacy): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Step 2: Handle unified --targets parameter
+ELSE IF --targets provided:
+    target_list = split_and_clean({--targets value}, [",", ";", "、"])
+    target_source = "explicit"
+
+    # Override type if explicitly set
+    IF --target-type provided:
+        target_type = --target-type
+        REPORT: "🎯 Using explicitly provided targets with type '{target_type}': {', '.join(target_list)}"
+    ELSE:
+        # Intelligent type detection (same logic as explore-auto)
+        target_type = detect_target_type(target_list)
+        REPORT: "🎯 Using explicitly provided targets (detected type: {target_type}): {', '.join(target_list)}"
+
+# Step 3: Extract from prompt
+ELSE IF --prompt provided:
+    # Extract from prompt: "for dashboard and settings" or "pages: home, about"
+    target_list = extract_targets_from_prompt(prompt_text)
+    target_source = "prompt_inferred"
+    IF NOT target_list:
+        target_list = ["home"]
+
+    # Detect type from prompt or targets
+    IF --target-type provided:
+        target_type = --target-type
+    ELSE:
+        target_type = detect_target_type(target_list)
+
+# Step 4: Fallback default
+ELSE:
+    target_list = ["home"]
+    target_type = "page"
+    target_source = "default"
+
+# Validate and clean target names
+validated_targets = []
+FOR target IN target_list:
+    cleaned = target.strip().lower().replace(" ", "-")
+    IF regex_match(cleaned, r"^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9_-]*$"):
+        validated_targets.append(cleaned)
+
+IF NOT validated_targets:
+    validated_targets = ["home"]
+    target_type = "page"
+
+type_emoji = "📄" IF target_type == "page" ELSE "🧩"
+type_label = "pages" IF target_type == "page" ELSE "components"
+
+REPORT: "📋 Imitate mode: {len(validated_targets)} {type_label} with single style"
+REPORT: "   {type_emoji} Targets: {', '.join(validated_targets)}"
+REPORT: "   Type: {target_type}"
+REPORT: "   Reference: {url_value OR images_pattern}"
+
+STORE: run_id, base_path, inferred_target_list = validated_targets, target_type = target_type
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 0.5: URL Screenshot Capture (Auto-Fallback)
+
+**Condition**: Only if `--url` provided
+
+**Execution**:
+```bash
+IF --url provided:
+    REPORT: "📸 Phase 0.5: Capturing screenshots..."
+    screenshot_dir = "{base_path}/screenshots"
+    Bash(mkdir -p "{screenshot_dir}")
+
+    screenshot_success = false
+    screenshot_files = []
+
+    # Method 1: Playwright CLI (preferred)
+    TRY:
+        REPORT: "   Attempting Playwright..."
+        Bash(npx playwright screenshot "{url_value}" "{screenshot_dir}/full-page.png" --full-page --timeout 30000)
+        screenshot_files.append("{screenshot_dir}/full-page.png")
+        screenshot_success = true
+        REPORT: "   ✅ Playwright screenshot captured"
+    CATCH:
+        REPORT: "   ⚠️ Playwright failed"
+
+    # Method 2: Chrome DevTools (fallback)
+    IF NOT screenshot_success:
+        TRY:
+            REPORT: "   Attempting Chrome headless..."
+            Bash(google-chrome --headless --disable-gpu --screenshot="{screenshot_dir}/full-page.png" --window-size=1920,1080 "{url_value}")
+            screenshot_files.append("{screenshot_dir}/full-page.png")
+            screenshot_success = true
+            REPORT: "   ✅ Chrome screenshot captured"
+        CATCH:
+            REPORT: "   ⚠️ Chrome failed"
+
+    # Manual upload fallback
+    IF NOT screenshot_success:
+        REPORT: ""
+        REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+        REPORT: "⚠️  AUTOMATED SCREENSHOT FAILED"
+        REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+        REPORT: "Unable to capture: {url_value}"
+        REPORT: ""
+        REPORT: "Manual screenshot required:"
+        REPORT: "  1. Visit: {url_value}"
+        REPORT: "  2. Take full-page screenshot"
+        REPORT: "  3. Save to: {screenshot_dir}/"
+        REPORT: ""
+        REPORT: "Options:"
+        REPORT: "  • 'ready' - screenshot saved"
+        REPORT: "  • 'skip' - use URL analysis only"
+        REPORT: "  • 'abort' - cancel workflow"
+        REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
+
+        user_response = WAIT_FOR_USER_INPUT()
+
+        IF user_response MATCHES r"^(ready|done|ok)$":
+            screenshot_files = Glob("{screenshot_dir}/*.{png,jpg,jpeg}")
+            IF screenshot_files:
+                screenshot_success = true
+                REPORT: "✅ Manual screenshot detected"
+            ELSE:
+                REPORT: "❌ No screenshot found, using URL analysis only"
+        ELSE IF user_response MATCHES r"^skip$":
+            REPORT: "⏭️  Skipping screenshot, using URL analysis"
+        ELSE IF user_response MATCHES r"^abort$":
+            ERROR: "Workflow aborted by user"
+            EXIT
+        ELSE:
+            REPORT: "⚠️ Invalid input, proceeding with URL analysis"
+
+    # Store results
+    IF screenshot_success:
+        STORE: screenshot_mode = "with_screenshots", screenshot_paths = screenshot_files
+        REPORT: "✅ Screenshot capture complete: {len(screenshot_files)} image(s)"
+    ELSE:
+        STORE: screenshot_mode = "url_only", screenshot_paths = []
+        REPORT: "ℹ️  Proceeding with URL analysis only"
+ELSE:
+    STORE: screenshot_mode = "manual_images", screenshot_paths = []
+    REPORT: "ℹ️  Using provided images (--images parameter)"
+```
+
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 1
+
+---
+
+### Phase 1: Single Style Extraction
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+# Determine input based on screenshot capture
+IF screenshot_mode == "with_screenshots":
+    screenshot_glob = "{base_path}/screenshots/*.{png,jpg,jpeg}"
+    images_flag = "--images \"{screenshot_glob}\""
+    url_flag = ""
+    source_desc = "captured screenshots from {url_value}"
+ELSE IF screenshot_mode == "url_only":
+    url_flag = "--url \"{url_value}\""
+    images_flag = ""
+    source_desc = "URL analysis of {url_value}"
+ELSE IF screenshot_mode == "manual_images":
+    images_flag = --images present ? "--images \"{image_glob}\"" : ""
+    url_flag = ""
+    source_desc = "user-provided images"
+
+prompt_flag = --prompt present ? "--prompt \"{prompt_text}\"" : ""
+run_base_flag = "--base-path \"{base_path}\""
+
+# Construct optimized extraction prompt
+enhanced_prompt = "Extract a single, high-fidelity design system that accurately imitates the visual style from {source_desc}. {prompt_text}"
+
+# Force single variant
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:extract {run_base_flag} {url_flag} {images_flag} --prompt \"{enhanced_prompt}\" --variants 1"
+
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 1: Style Extraction"
+REPORT: "   Source: {source_desc}"
+REPORT: "   Mode: Single style (imitation-optimized)"
+
+SlashCommand(command)
+```
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 2
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Fast Token Adaptation (Bypass Consolidate)
+
+**Action**: Direct extraction of design tokens, bypassing heavy `consolidate` step
+
+**Execution**:
+```bash
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 2: Fast token adaptation (bypassing consolidate)"
+
+# Read single style card
+style_cards = Read({base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+style_card = style_cards.style_cards[0]
+
+design_tokens = style_card.proposed_tokens
+philosophy = style_card.design_philosophy
+style_name = style_card.name
+
+# Write design-tokens.json directly
+Write({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json, JSON.stringify(design_tokens, null, 2))
+
+# Create minimal style-guide.md
+Write({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/style-guide.md):
+# Design System: {style_name}
+
+## Design Philosophy
+{philosophy}
+
+## Description
+{style_card.description}
+
+## Design Tokens
+All tokens in `design-tokens.json` follow OKLCH color space.
+
+**Key Colors**:
+- Primary: {design_tokens.colors.brand.primary}
+- Background: {design_tokens.colors.surface.background}
+- Text: {design_tokens.colors.text.primary}
+
+**Typography**:
+- Heading: {design_tokens.typography.font_family.heading}
+- Body: {design_tokens.typography.font_family.body}
+
+**Spacing Scale**: {design_tokens.spacing.keys().length} values
+
+*Note: Generated in imitate mode for fast replication.*
+
+REPORT: "✅ Tokens extracted and formatted"
+REPORT: "   Style: {style_name}"
+REPORT: "   Bypassed consolidate for {performance_gain}× speed"
+```
+
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 3
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Single Prototype Generation
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+run_base_flag = "--base-path \"{base_path}\""
+targets_string = ",".join(inferred_target_list)
+targets_flag = "--targets \"{targets_string}\""
+type_flag = "--target-type \"{target_type}\""
+
+# Force 1×1 mode
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:generate {run_base_flag} {targets_flag} {type_flag} --style-variants 1 --layout-variants 1"
+
+type_emoji = "📄" IF target_type == "page" ELSE "🧩"
+type_label = "page(s)" IF target_type == "page" ELSE "component(s)"
+
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 3: Generating {len(inferred_target_list)} {type_label}"
+REPORT: "   {type_emoji} Targets: {targets_string}"
+REPORT: "   Mode: 1×1 (imitation-optimized)"
+
+SlashCommand(command)
+```
+
+**Result**:
+- Prototypes: `{target}-style-1-layout-1.html`
+- Total: `len(inferred_target_list)`
+- Type: {target_type} (full-page for pages, minimal wrapper for components)
+
+**Auto-Continue**: On completion → Phase 4
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Design System Integration
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+IF --session:
+    session_flag = "--session {session_id}"
+    command = "/workflow:ui-design:update {session_flag}"
+    SlashCommand(command)
+ELSE:
+    REPORT: "ℹ️ Standalone mode: Skipping integration"
+    REPORT: "   Prototypes at: {base_path}/prototypes/"
+```
+
+**Completion**: Workflow complete
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Initialize run directory and infer targets", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
+  {"content": "Capture screenshots from URL (if provided)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Capturing screenshots"},
+  {"content": "Extract single design style from reference", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting style"},
+  {"content": "Adapt tokens (bypass consolidate)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Adapting tokens"},
+  {"content": "Generate single-style prototypes", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating prototypes"},
+  {"content": "Integrate design system", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Integrating design"}
+]})
+
+// Update after each phase: Mark current completed, next in_progress
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **No reference source**: Error if neither `--url` nor `--images` provided
+- **Screenshot capture failure**:
+  - Tries 2 methods: Playwright → Chrome DevTools
+  - Falls back to manual upload: user uploads screenshot, skips, or aborts
+  - Gracefully handles missing Playwright/Chrome
+- **Invalid URL/images**: Report error, suggest alternative input
+- **Token extraction failure**: Fallback to minimal default design system
+
+## Performance Comparison
+
+| Aspect | explore-auto | imitate-auto |
+|--------|--------------|--------------|
+| **Purpose** | Design exploration | Design replication |
+| **Input** | Optional URL/images | **Required** URL or images |
+| **Variants** | 1-5 styles × 1-5 layouts | Always 1 × 1 |
+| **Consolidate** | Full consolidation | **Bypassed** (direct tokens) |
+| **Speed** | Baseline | **~2-3× faster** |
+| **Output** | Matrix (S×L×P) | Direct (1×1×P) |
+| **Phases** | 6 phases | 5 phases |
+
+**Performance Benefits**:
+1. **Skipped consolidate**: Saves ~30-60s (most expensive phase)
+2. **Single variant**: Reduces extraction complexity
+3. **Direct token mapping**: Simple file ops vs AI synthesis
+4. **Streamlined decisions**: No variant selection/confirmation
+
+## Example Execution Flows
+
+### Example 1: URL with Auto-Screenshot (Pages)
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://linear.app" --targets "home,features,pricing"
+
+# Flow:
+# 0. Init: 3 pages identified
+# 0.5. Screenshot: Playwright captures linear.app
+# 1. Extract: Single style from screenshot
+# 2. Adapt: Direct tokens (~2s vs consolidate's ~45s)
+# 3. Generate: 3 page prototypes
+# 4. Complete
+# Time: ~2-3 min (vs 5-7 min with explore-auto)
+```
+
+### Example 2: Images with Guidance (Page Mode)
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --images "refs/dark-theme.png" --prompt "Focus on dark mode" --targets "dashboard"
+
+# Flow: 0 → 0.5 (skip) → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4
+# Output: dashboard-style-1-layout-1.html
+# Type: page (full-page layout)
+```
+
+### Example 3: Component Mode
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://example.com" --targets "navbar,hero,card" --target-type "component"
+
+# Flow: 0 → 0.5 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4
+# Output: navbar-style-1-layout-1.html, hero-style-1-layout-1.html, card-style-1-layout-1.html
+# Type: component (minimal wrapper for isolated comparison)
+```
+
+### Example 4: URL with Manual Screenshot
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://stripe.com/pricing" --targets "pricing"
+
+# 0.5. Screenshot:
+#      ⚠️ Playwright failed → Chrome failed
+#      📸 User prompted for manual upload
+#      User saves screenshot → types 'ready' → ✅ continues
+#      OR types 'skip' → ⚠️ uses URL analysis only
+# Continues: 1 → 2 → 3 → 4
+```
+
+### Example 5: Legacy Parameter Support
+```bash
+# Using legacy --pages parameter (backward compatible)
+/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url "https://example.com" --pages "home,dashboard"
+
+# Equivalent to: --targets "home,dashboard" --target-type "page"
+```
+
+## Final Completion Message
+
+```
+✅ UI Design Imitation Complete!
+
+Mode: Single Style Replication
+Run ID: {run_id}
+Session: {session_id or "standalone"}
+Reference: {url OR images}
+Type: {target_type_icon} {target_type_label}
+
+Phase 0 - Initialization: {target_count} {target_type}(s) prepared
+Phase 0.5 - Screenshot Capture: {screenshot_status}
+  {IF success: ✅ Captured via {method}}
+  {ELSE: ⚠️ URL analysis only}
+Phase 1 - Style Extraction: Single style extracted
+Phase 2 - Token Adaptation: Bypassed consolidate (⚡ {time_saved}s saved)
+Phase 3 - Prototype Generation: {target_count} {target_type} prototypes created
+Phase 4 - Design Integration: {integrated OR "Standalone mode"}
+
+📂 Output: {base_path}/
+  ├── style-extraction/style-cards.json (1 style card)
+  ├── style-consolidation/style-1/ (design tokens)
+  └── prototypes/ ({target_count} HTML/CSS files)
+
+🌐 Preview: {base_path}/prototypes/index.html
+
+{target_type_icon} Targets: {', '.join(inferred_target_list)}
+  Type: {target_type}
+  Context: {IF target_type == "page": "Full-page layouts" ELSE: "Isolated components with minimal wrapper"}
+
+Performance:
+- Design system: ~{time}s (vs ~{consolidate_time}s with consolidate)
+- Total workflow: ~{total_time}s
+- Speed improvement: ~{improvement}× faster than explore-auto
+
+{IF session:
+Next: /workflow:plan to create implementation tasks
+}
+{ELSE:
+Prototypes ready: {base_path}/prototypes/
+}
+```
+
+**Dynamic Values**:
+- `target_type_icon`: "📄" for page, "🧩" for component
+- `target_type_label`: "Pages" for page, "Components" for component
+- `target_count`: `len(inferred_target_list)`
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/update.md

@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+---
+name: update
+description: Update brainstorming artifacts with finalized design system references
+usage: /workflow:ui-design:update --session <session_id> [--selected-prototypes "<list>"]
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--selected-prototypes \"dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2\"]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:ui-design:update --session WFS-auth
+  - /workflow:ui-design:update --session WFS-dashboard --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1"
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Design Update Command
+
+## Overview
+Synchronize finalized design system references to brainstorming artifacts, preparing them for `/workflow:plan` consumption. This command updates **references only** (via @ notation), not content duplication.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Reference-Only Updates**: Use @ references, no content duplication
+- **Main Claude Execution**: Direct updates by main Claude (no Agent handoff)
+- **Synthesis Alignment**: Update synthesis-specification.md UI/UX Guidelines section
+- **Plan-Ready Output**: Ensure design artifacts discoverable by task-generate
+- **Minimal Reading**: Verify file existence, don't read design content
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Artifact Validation
+
+```bash
+# Validate session
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
+
+# Verify required design artifacts exist in latest design run
+latest_design = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/WFS-{session}/design-*")
+
+# Detect design system structure (unified vs separate)
+IF exists({latest_design}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json):
+    # Unified mode (single design system)
+    design_system_mode = "unified"
+    design_tokens_path = "style-consolidation/design-tokens.json"
+    style_guide_path = "style-consolidation/style-guide.md"
+ELSE IF exists({latest_design}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json):
+    # Separate mode (per-style design systems)
+    design_system_mode = "separate"
+    design_tokens_path = "style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json"
+    style_guide_path = "style-consolidation/style-1/style-guide.md"
+ELSE:
+    ERROR: "No design tokens found. Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate first"
+
+VERIFY:
+- {latest_design}/{design_tokens_path}
+- {latest_design}/{style_guide_path}
+- {latest_design}/prototypes/*.html (at least one prototype)
+
+REPORT: "📋 Design system mode: {design_system_mode}"
+REPORT: "   Tokens: {design_tokens_path}"
+
+# Prototype selection
+IF --selected-prototypes provided:
+    VALIDATE: Specified prototypes exist
+    selected_list = parse_comma_separated(--selected-prototypes)
+ELSE:
+    AUTO-SELECT: Use all generated prototypes
+    selected_list = Glob({latest_design}/prototypes/*.html)
+
+REPORT: "Found {count} design artifacts, {prototype_count} prototypes"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Load Target Artifacts Only
+
+**What to Load**: Only the files we need to **update**, not the design files we're referencing.
+
+```bash
+# Load target brainstorming artifacts (files to be updated)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md) [if exists]
+
+# Optional: Read prototype notes for descriptions (minimal context)
+FOR each selected_prototype IN selected_list:
+    Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/{selected_prototype}-notes.md)
+    # Extract: layout_strategy, page_name only
+```
+
+**Note**: We do **NOT** read design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, or prototype HTML. We only verify they exist and generate @ references to them.
+
+### Phase 3: Update Synthesis Specification
+
+Update `.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md` with design system references.
+
+**Target Section**: `## UI/UX Guidelines`
+
+**Content Template**:
+```markdown
+## UI/UX Guidelines
+
+### Design System Reference
+**Finalized Design Tokens**: @../design-{run_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+**Style Guide**: @../design-{run_id}/{style_guide_path}
+**Design System Mode**: {design_system_mode}
+
+### Implementation Requirements
+**Token Adherence**: All UI implementations MUST use design token CSS custom properties
+**Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance validated in design-tokens.json
+**Responsive**: Mobile-first design using token-based breakpoints
+**Component Patterns**: Follow patterns documented in style-guide.md
+
+### Reference Prototypes
+{FOR each selected_prototype:
+- **{page_name}**: @../design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+  - Layout: {layout_strategy from notes}
+}
+
+### Design System Assets
+```json
+{
+  "design_tokens": "design-{run_id}/{design_tokens_path}",
+  "style_guide": "design-{run_id}/{style_guide_path}",
+  "design_system_mode": "{design_system_mode}",
+  "prototypes": [
+    {FOR each: "design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html"}
+  ]
+}
+```
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+# Option 1: Edit existing section
+Edit(
+  file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+  old_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n[existing content]",
+  new_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n\n[new design reference content]"
+)
+
+# Option 2: Append if section doesn't exist
+IF section not found:
+    Edit(
+      file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+      old_string="[end of document]",
+      new_string="\n\n## UI/UX Guidelines\n\n[new design reference content]"
+    )
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update UI Designer Style Guide
+
+Create or update `.brainstorming/ui-designer/style-guide.md`:
+
+```markdown
+# UI Designer Style Guide
+
+## Design System Integration
+This style guide references the finalized design system from the design refinement phase.
+
+**Design Tokens**: @../../design-{run_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+**Style Guide**: @../../design-{run_id}/{style_guide_path}
+**Design System Mode**: {design_system_mode}
+
+## Implementation Guidelines
+1. **Use CSS Custom Properties**: All styles reference design tokens
+2. **Follow Semantic HTML**: Use HTML5 semantic elements
+3. **Maintain Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance required
+4. **Responsive Design**: Mobile-first with token-based breakpoints
+
+## Reference Prototypes
+{FOR each selected_prototype:
+- **{page_name}**: @../../design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+}
+
+## Token System
+For complete token definitions and usage examples, see:
+- Design Tokens: @../../design-{run_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+- Style Guide: @../../design-{run_id}/{style_guide_path}
+
+---
+*Auto-generated by /workflow:ui-design:update*
+*Last updated: {timestamp}*
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+Write(
+  file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/style-guide.md",
+  content="[generated content with @ references]"
+)
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Completion
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {content: "Validate session and design system artifacts", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating artifacts"},
+    {content: "Load target brainstorming artifacts", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading target files"},
+    {content: "Update synthesis-specification.md with design references", status: "completed", activeForm: "Updating synthesis spec"},
+    {content: "Create/update ui-designer/style-guide.md", status: "completed", activeForm: "Updating UI designer guide"}
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**Completion Message**:
+```
+✅ Design system references updated for session: WFS-{session}
+
+Updated artifacts:
+✓ synthesis-specification.md - UI/UX Guidelines section with @ references
+✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md - Design system reference guide
+
+Design system assets ready for /workflow:plan:
+- design-tokens.json
+- style-guide.md
+- {prototype_count} reference prototypes
+
+Next: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
+      The plan phase will automatically discover and utilize the design system.
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+**Updated Files**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+├── synthesis-specification.md       # Updated with UI/UX Guidelines section
+└── ui-designer/
+    └── style-guide.md               # New or updated design reference guide
+```
+
+**@ Reference Format** (used in synthesis-specification.md):
+```
+@../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+@../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+@../design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+```
+
+**@ Reference Format** (used in ui-designer/style-guide.md):
+```
+@../../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+@../../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+@../../design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+```
+
+## Integration with /workflow:plan
+
+After this update, `/workflow:plan` will discover design assets through:
+
+**Phase 3: Intelligent Analysis** (`/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced`)
+- Reads synthesis-specification.md
+- Discovers @ references to design system files
+- Includes design system context in ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+**Phase 4: Task Generation** (`/workflow:tools:task-generate`)
+- Reads ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- Discovers design assets from synthesis-specification.md
+- Includes design system paths in task JSON files
+
+**Example Task JSON** (generated by task-generate):
+```json
+{
+  "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+  "context": {
+    "design_system": {
+      "tokens": "design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json",
+      "style_guide": "design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/style-guide.md",
+      "prototypes": ["design-{run_id}/prototypes/dashboard-variant-1.html"]
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Missing design artifacts**: Error with message "Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate and /workflow:ui-design:generate first"
+- **synthesis-specification.md not found**: Warning, create minimal version with just UI/UX Guidelines
+- **ui-designer/ directory missing**: Create directory and file
+- **Edit conflicts**: Preserve existing content, append or replace only UI/UX Guidelines section
+- **Invalid prototype names**: Skip invalid entries, continue with valid ones
+
+## Validation Checks
+
+After update, verify:
+- [ ] synthesis-specification.md contains UI/UX Guidelines section
+- [ ] UI/UX Guidelines include @ references (not content duplication)
+- [ ] ui-designer/style-guide.md created or updated
+- [ ] All @ referenced files exist and are accessible
+- [ ] @ reference paths are relative and correct
+
+## Key Features
+
+1. **Reference-Only Updates**
+   - Uses @ notation for file references
+   - No content duplication between design and brainstorming spaces
+   - Lightweight, maintainable approach
+
+2. **Main Claude Direct Execution**
+   - No Agent handoff (preserves context)
+   - Simple reference generation (no complex synthesis)
+   - Reliable path resolution
+
+3. **Plan-Ready Output**
+   - `/workflow:plan` Phase 3 can discover design system
+   - Task generation includes design asset paths
+   - Clear integration points for implementation tasks
+
+4. **Minimal Reading**
+   - Only reads target files to update (synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/analysis.md)
+   - Verifies design file existence (no content reading)
+   - Optional: reads prototype notes for descriptions
+
+5. **Flexible Prototype Selection**
+   - Auto-select all prototypes (default)
+   - Manual selection via --selected-prototypes parameter
+   - Validates prototype existence before referencing
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- **Input**: Design system artifacts from `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` and `/workflow:ui-design:generate`
+- **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/style-guide.md with @ references
+- **Next Phase**: `/workflow:plan` discovers and utilizes design system through @ references
+- **Auto Integration**: Automatically triggered by `/workflow:ui-design:auto` workflow
+
+## Why Main Claude Execution?
+
+This command is executed directly by main Claude (not delegated to an Agent) because:
+
+1. **Simple Reference Generation**: Only generating file paths, not complex synthesis
+2. **Context Preservation**: Main Claude has full session and conversation context
+3. **Minimal Transformation**: Primarily updating references, not analyzing content
+4. **Path Resolution**: Requires precise relative path calculation
+5. **Edit Operations**: Better error recovery for Edit conflicts
+6. **Synthesis Pattern**: Follows same direct-execution pattern as other reference updates
+
+This ensures reliable, lightweight integration without Agent handoff overhead.