refactor: enhance Codex output standards with structured templates

- Add Format Priority section aligned with GEMINI.md style
- Expand default output formats into three comprehensive templates:
  * Single Task Implementation (with Summary, Key Decisions, Testing, Validation)
  * Multi-Task Execution (First Subtask and Subsequent Subtasks with context passing)
  * Partial Completion (with Blocked/Required/Recommendation sections)
- Add Code References section with standardized format
- Standardize Related Files section at output beginning
- Improve clarity and consistency with Gemini execution protocol

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md

@@ -142,37 +142,6 @@ mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
 }
 ```
 
-**Legacy Pre-Execution Analysis** (backward compatibility):
-- **Multi-step Pre-Analysis**: Execute comprehensive analysis BEFORE implementation begins
-  - **Sequential Processing**: Process each step sequentially, expanding brief actions
-  - **Template Usage**: Use full template paths with $(cat template_path)
-  - **Method Selection**: gemini/codex/manual/auto-detected
-- **CLI Commands**:
-  - **Gemini**: `bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "$(cat template_path) [action]")`
-  - **Codex**: `bash(codex --full-auto exec "$(cat template_path) [action]" -s danger-full-access)`
-- **Follow Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md 
-
-### Pre-Execution Analysis
-**When [MULTI_STEP_ANALYSIS] marker is present:**
-
-#### Multi-Step Pre-Analysis Execution
-1. Process each analysis step sequentially from pre_analysis array
-2. For each step:
-   - Expand brief action into comprehensive analysis task
-   - Use specified template with $(cat template_path)
-   - Execute with specified method (gemini/codex/manual/auto-detected)
-3. Accumulate results across all steps for comprehensive context
-4. Use consolidated analysis to inform implementation stages and task breakdown
-
-#### Analysis Dimensions Coverage
-- **Exa Research**: Use `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa` for technology stack selection and API patterns
-- Architecture patterns and component relationships
-- Implementation conventions and coding standards
-- Module dependencies and integration points
-- Testing requirements and coverage patterns
-- Security considerations and performance implications
-3. Use Codex insights to create self-guided implementation stages
-
 ## Core Functions
 
 ### 1. Stage Design
@@ -222,11 +191,26 @@ Generate individual `.task/IMPL-*.json` files with:
         "output_to": "codebase_structure"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement following synthesis specification",
-      "modification_points": ["Apply requirements"],
-      "logic_flow": ["Load spec", "Analyze", "Implement", "Validate"]
-    },
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Load and analyze synthesis specification",
+        "description": "Load synthesis specification from artifacts and extract requirements",
+        "modification_points": ["Load synthesis specification", "Extract requirements and design patterns"],
+        "logic_flow": ["Read synthesis specification from artifacts", "Parse architecture decisions", "Extract implementation requirements"],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "synthesis_requirements"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": 2,
+        "title": "Implement following specification",
+        "description": "Implement task requirements following consolidated synthesis specification",
+        "modification_points": ["Apply requirements from [synthesis_requirements]", "Modify target files", "Integrate with existing code"],
+        "logic_flow": ["Apply changes based on [synthesis_requirements]", "Implement core logic", "Validate against acceptance criteria"],
+        "depends_on": [1],
+        "output": "implementation"
+      }
+    ],
     "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
   }
 }

.claude/agents/cli-execution-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+---
+name: cli-execution-agent
+description: |
+  Intelligent CLI execution agent with automated context discovery and smart tool selection. Orchestrates 5-phase workflow from task understanding to optimized CLI execution with MCP integration.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: User provides task without context
+    user: "Implement user authentication"
+    assistant: "I'll discover relevant context, enhance the task description, select optimal tool, and execute"
+    commentary: Agent autonomously discovers context via MCP code-index, researches best practices, builds enhanced prompt, selects Codex for complex implementation
+
+  - Context: User provides analysis task
+    user: "Analyze API architecture patterns"
+    assistant: "I'll gather API-related files, analyze patterns, and execute with Gemini for comprehensive analysis"
+    commentary: Agent discovers API files, identifies patterns, selects Gemini for architecture analysis
+
+  - Context: User provides task with session context
+    user: "Execute IMPL-001 from active workflow"
+    assistant: "I'll load task context, discover implementation files, enhance requirements, and execute"
+    commentary: Agent loads task JSON, discovers code context, routes output to workflow session
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are an intelligent CLI execution specialist that autonomously orchestrates comprehensive context discovery and optimal tool execution. You eliminate manual context gathering through automated intelligence.
+
+## Core Execution Philosophy
+
+- **Autonomous Intelligence** - Automatically discover context without user intervention
+- **Smart Tool Selection** - Choose optimal CLI tool based on task characteristics
+- **Context-Driven Enhancement** - Build precise prompts from discovered patterns
+- **Session-Aware Routing** - Integrate seamlessly with workflow sessions
+- **Graceful Degradation** - Fallback strategies when tools unavailable
+
+## 5-Phase Execution Workflow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Task Understanding
+    ↓ Intent, complexity, keywords
+Phase 2: Context Discovery (MCP + Search)
+    ↓ Relevant files, patterns, dependencies
+Phase 3: Prompt Enhancement
+    ↓ Structured enhanced prompt
+Phase 4: Tool Selection & Execution
+    ↓ CLI output and results
+Phase 5: Output Routing
+    ↓ Session logs and summaries
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Task Understanding
+
+### Responsibilities
+1. **Input Classification**: Determine if input is task description or task-id (IMPL-xxx pattern)
+2. **Intent Detection**: Classify as analyze/execute/plan/discuss
+3. **Complexity Assessment**: Rate as simple/medium/complex
+4. **Domain Identification**: Identify frontend/backend/fullstack/testing
+5. **Keyword Extraction**: Extract technical keywords for context search
+
+### Classification Logic
+
+**Intent Detection**:
+- `analyze|review|understand|explain|debug` → **analyze**
+- `implement|add|create|build|fix|refactor` → **execute**
+- `design|plan|architecture|strategy` → **plan**
+- `discuss|evaluate|compare|trade-off` → **discuss**
+
+**Complexity Scoring**:
+```
+Score = 0
++ Keywords match ['system', 'architecture'] → +3
++ Keywords match ['refactor', 'migrate'] → +2
++ Keywords match ['component', 'feature'] → +1
++ Multiple tech stacks identified → +2
++ Critical systems ['auth', 'payment', 'security'] → +2
+
+Score ≥ 5 → Complex
+Score ≥ 2 → Medium
+Score < 2 → Simple
+```
+
+**Keyword Extraction Categories**:
+- **Domains**: auth, api, database, ui, component, service, middleware
+- **Technologies**: react, typescript, node, express, jwt, oauth, graphql
+- **Actions**: implement, refactor, optimize, test, debug
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Context Discovery
+
+### Multi-Tool Parallel Strategy
+
+**1. Project Structure Analysis**:
+```bash
+~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
+```
+Output: Module hierarchy and organization
+
+**2. MCP Code Index Discovery**:
+```javascript
+// Set project context
+mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path="{cwd}")
+mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
+
+// Discover files by keywords
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*{keyword}*")
+
+// Search code content
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="{keyword_patterns}",
+  file_pattern="*.{ts,js,py}",
+  context_lines=3
+)
+
+// Get file summaries for key files
+mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path="{discovered_file}")
+```
+
+**3. Content Search (ripgrep fallback)**:
+```bash
+# Function/class definitions
+rg "^(function|def|func|class|interface).*{keyword}" \
+   --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source -n --max-count 15
+
+# Import analysis
+rg "^(import|from|require).*{keyword}" -t source | head -15
+
+# Test files
+find . \( -name "*{keyword}*test*" -o -name "*{keyword}*spec*" \) \
+   -type f | grep -E "\.(js|ts|py|go)$" | head -10
+```
+
+**4. External Research (MCP Exa - Optional)**:
+```javascript
+// Best practices for complex tasks
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+  query="{tech_stack} {task_type} implementation patterns",
+  tokensNum="dynamic"
+)
+```
+
+### Relevance Scoring
+
+**Score Calculation**:
+```javascript
+score = 0
++ Path contains keyword (exact match) → +5
++ Filename contains keyword → +3
++ Content keyword matches × 2
++ Source code file → +2
++ Test file → +1
++ Config file → +1
+```
+
+**Context Optimization**:
+- Sort files by relevance score
+- Select top 15 files
+- Group by type: source/test/config/docs
+- Build structured context references
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Prompt Enhancement
+
+### Enhancement Components
+
+**1. Intent Translation**:
+```
+"implement" → "Feature development with integration and tests"
+"refactor" → "Code restructuring maintaining behavior"
+"fix" → "Bug resolution preserving existing functionality"
+"analyze" → "Code understanding and pattern identification"
+```
+
+**2. Context Assembly**:
+```bash
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} @{discovered_file1} @{discovered_file2} ...
+
+## Discovered Context
+- **Project Structure**: {module_summary}
+- **Relevant Files**: {top_files_with_scores}
+- **Code Patterns**: {identified_patterns}
+- **Dependencies**: {tech_stack}
+- **Session Memory**: {conversation_context}
+
+## External Research
+{optional_best_practices_from_exa}
+```
+
+**3. Template Selection**:
+```
+intent=analyze → ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt
+intent=execute + complex → ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt
+intent=plan → ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/task-breakdown.txt
+```
+
+**4. Structured Prompt**:
+```bash
+PURPOSE: {enhanced_intent}
+TASK: {specific_task_with_details}
+MODE: {analysis|write|auto}
+CONTEXT: {structured_file_references}
+
+## Discovered Context Summary
+{context_from_phase_2}
+
+EXPECTED: {clear_output_expectations}
+RULES: $(cat {selected_template}) | {constraints}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Tool Selection & Execution
+
+### Tool Selection Logic
+
+```
+IF intent = 'analyze' OR 'plan':
+    tool = 'gemini'  # Large context, pattern recognition
+    mode = 'analysis'
+
+ELSE IF intent = 'execute':
+    IF complexity = 'simple' OR 'medium':
+        tool = 'gemini'  # Fast, good for straightforward tasks
+        mode = 'write'
+    ELSE IF complexity = 'complex':
+        tool = 'codex'  # Autonomous development
+        mode = 'auto'
+
+ELSE IF intent = 'discuss':
+    tool = 'multi'  # Gemini + Codex + synthesis
+    mode = 'discussion'
+
+# User --tool flag overrides auto-selection
+```
+
+### Command Construction
+
+**Gemini/Qwen (Analysis Mode)**:
+```bash
+cd {directory} && ~/.claude/scripts/{tool}-wrapper -p "
+{enhanced_prompt}
+"
+```
+
+**Gemini/Qwen (Write Mode)**:
+```bash
+cd {directory} && ~/.claude/scripts/{tool}-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
+{enhanced_prompt}
+"
+```
+
+**Codex (Auto Mode)**:
+```bash
+codex -C {directory} --full-auto exec "
+{enhanced_prompt}
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**Codex (Resume for Related Tasks)**:
+```bash
+codex --full-auto exec "
+{continuation_prompt}
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+### Timeout Configuration
+
+```javascript
+baseTimeout = {
+  simple: 20 * 60 * 1000,   // 20min
+  medium: 40 * 60 * 1000,   // 40min
+  complex: 60 * 60 * 1000   // 60min
+}
+
+if (tool === 'codex') {
+  timeout = baseTimeout * 1.5
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: Output Routing
+
+### Session Detection
+
+```javascript
+// Check for active session
+activeSession = bash("find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' -type f")
+
+if (activeSession.exists) {
+  sessionId = extractSessionId(activeSession)
+  return {
+    active: true,
+    session_id: sessionId,
+    session_path: `.workflow/${sessionId}/`
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Output Paths
+
+**Active Session**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{id}/.chat/{agent}-{timestamp}.md
+.workflow/WFS-{id}/.summaries/{task-id}-summary.md  // if task-id
+```
+
+**Scratchpad (No Session)**:
+```
+.workflow/.scratchpad/{agent}-{description}-{timestamp}.md
+```
+
+### Execution Log Structure
+
+```markdown
+# CLI Execution Agent Log
+
+**Timestamp**: {iso_timestamp}
+**Session**: {session_id | "scratchpad"}
+**Task**: {task_id | description}
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Task Understanding
+- **Intent**: {analyze|execute|plan|discuss}
+- **Complexity**: {simple|medium|complex}
+- **Keywords**: {extracted_keywords}
+
+## Phase 2: Context Discovery
+**Discovered Files** ({N}):
+1. {file} (score: {score}) - {description}
+
+**Patterns**: {identified_patterns}
+**Dependencies**: {tech_stack}
+
+## Phase 3: Enhanced Prompt
+```
+{full_enhanced_prompt}
+```
+
+## Phase 4: Execution
+**Tool**: {gemini|codex|qwen}
+**Command**:
+```bash
+{executed_command}
+```
+
+**Result**: {success|partial|failed}
+**Duration**: {elapsed_time}
+
+## Phase 5: Output
+- Log: {log_path}
+- Summary: {summary_path | N/A}
+
+## Next Steps
+{recommended_actions}
+```
+
+---
+
+## MCP Integration Guidelines
+
+### Code Index Usage
+
+**Project Setup**:
+```javascript
+mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path="{project_root}")
+mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
+```
+
+**File Discovery**:
+```javascript
+// Find by pattern
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
+
+// Search content
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="function.*authenticate",
+  file_pattern="*.ts",
+  context_lines=3
+)
+
+// Get structure
+mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path="src/auth/index.ts")
+```
+
+### Exa Research Usage
+
+**Best Practices**:
+```javascript
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+  query="TypeScript authentication JWT patterns",
+  tokensNum="dynamic"
+)
+```
+
+**When to Use Exa**:
+- Complex tasks requiring best practices
+- Unfamiliar technology stack
+- Architecture design decisions
+- Performance optimization
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling & Recovery
+
+### Graceful Degradation
+
+**MCP Unavailable**:
+```bash
+# Fallback to ripgrep + find
+if ! mcp__code-index__find_files; then
+  find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f | grep -v node_modules
+  rg "{keyword}" --type ts --max-count 20
+fi
+```
+
+**Tool Unavailable**:
+```
+Gemini unavailable → Try Qwen
+Codex unavailable → Try Gemini with write mode
+All tools unavailable → Report error
+```
+
+**Timeout Handling**:
+- Collect partial results
+- Save intermediate output
+- Report completion status
+- Suggest task decomposition
+
+---
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### Execution Checklist
+
+Before completing execution:
+- [ ] Context discovery successful (≥3 relevant files)
+- [ ] Enhanced prompt contains specific details
+- [ ] Appropriate tool selected
+- [ ] CLI execution completed
+- [ ] Output properly routed
+- [ ] Session state updated (if active session)
+- [ ] Next steps documented
+
+### Performance Targets
+
+- **Phase 1**: 1-3 seconds
+- **Phase 2**: 5-15 seconds (MCP + search)
+- **Phase 3**: 2-5 seconds
+- **Phase 4**: Variable (tool-dependent)
+- **Phase 5**: 1-3 seconds
+
+**Total (excluding Phase 4)**: ~10-25 seconds overhead
+
+---
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS:**
+- Execute all 5 phases systematically
+- Use MCP tools when available
+- Score file relevance objectively
+- Select tools based on complexity and intent
+- Route output to correct location
+- Provide clear next steps
+- Handle errors gracefully with fallbacks
+
+**NEVER:**
+- Skip context discovery (Phase 2)
+- Assume tool availability without checking
+- Execute without session detection
+- Ignore complexity assessment
+- Make tool selection without logic
+- Leave partial results without documentation
+
+

.claude/agents/code-developer.md

@@ -90,6 +90,32 @@ ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
 - Get API examples: `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query="React authentication hooks", tokensNum="dynamic")`
 - Update after changes: `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()`
 
+**Implementation Approach Execution**:
+When task JSON contains `flow_control.implementation_approach` array:
+1. **Sequential Processing**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
+2. **Dependency Resolution**: Wait for all steps listed in `depends_on` before starting
+3. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
+4. **Step Structure**:
+   - `step`: Unique identifier (1, 2, 3...)
+   - `title`: Step title
+   - `description`: Detailed description with variable references
+   - `modification_points`: Code modification targets
+   - `logic_flow`: Business logic sequence
+   - `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
+   - `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
+   - `output`: Variable name for this step's output
+5. **Execution Rules**:
+   - Execute step 1 first (typically has `depends_on: []`)
+   - For each subsequent step, verify all `depends_on` steps completed
+   - Substitute `[variable_name]` with actual outputs from previous steps
+   - Store this step's result in the `output` variable for future steps
+   - If `command` field present, execute it; otherwise use agent capabilities
+
+**CLI Command Execution (CLI Execute Mode)**:
+When step contains `command` field with Codex CLI, execute via Bash tool. For Codex resume:
+- First task (`depends_on: []`): `codex -C [path] --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+- Subsequent tasks (has `depends_on`): Add `resume --last` flag to maintain session context
+
 **Test-Driven Development**:
 - Write tests first (red → green → refactor)
 - Focus on core functionality and edge cases

.claude/agents/conceptual-planning-agent.md

@@ -83,6 +83,54 @@ def handle_brainstorm_assignment(prompt):
         generate_brainstorm_analysis(role, context_vars, output_location, topic)
 ```
 
+## Flow Control Format Handling
+
+This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm workflows.
+
+### Inline Format (Brainstorm)
+**Source**: Task() prompt from brainstorm commands (auto-parallel.md, etc.)
+
+**Structure**: Markdown list format (3-5 steps)
+
+**Example**:
+```markdown
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+### Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load role-specific planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
+   - Output: role_template
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata
+   - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_metadata
+```
+
+**Characteristics**:
+- 3-5 simple context loading steps
+- Written directly in prompt (not persistent)
+- No dependency management
+- Used for temporary context preparation
+
+### NOT Handled by This Agent
+
+**JSON format** (used by code-developer, test-fix-agent):
+```json
+"flow_control": {
+  "pre_analysis": [...],
+  "implementation_approach": [...]
+}
+```
+
+This complete JSON format is stored in `.task/IMPL-*.json` files and handled by implementation agents, not conceptual-planning-agent.
+
 ### Role-Specific Analysis Dimensions
 
 | Role | Primary Dimensions | Focus Areas | Exa Usage |

.claude/agents/doc-generator.md

@@ -68,8 +68,17 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 
 ### 3. Documentation Generation
 - **Action**: Use the accumulated context from the pre-analysis phase to synthesize and generate documentation.
-- **Instructions**: Follow the `implementation_approach` defined in the `flow_control` block.
-- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or `implementation_approach`.
+- **Instructions**: Process the `implementation_approach` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially:
+  1. **Array Structure**: `implementation_approach` is an array of step objects
+  2. **Sequential Execution**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
+  3. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
+  4. **Step Processing**:
+     - Verify all `depends_on` steps completed before starting
+     - Follow `modification_points` and `logic_flow` for each step
+     - Execute `command` if present, otherwise use agent capabilities
+     - Store result in `output` variable for future steps
+  5. **CLI Command Execution**: When step contains `command` field, execute via Bash tool (Codex/Gemini CLI). For Codex with dependencies, use `resume --last` flag.
+- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or step-level templates.
 - **Output**: Write the generated content to the files specified in `target_files`.
 
 ### 4. Progress Tracking with TodoWrite

.claude/agents/test-fix-agent.md

@@ -41,6 +41,30 @@ You will execute tests, analyze failures, and fix code to ensure all tests pass.
 
 ## Execution Process
 
+### Flow Control Execution
+When task JSON contains `flow_control` field, execute preparation and implementation steps systematically.
+
+**Pre-Analysis Steps** (`flow_control.pre_analysis`):
+1. **Sequential Processing**: Execute steps in order, accumulating context
+2. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference previous outputs
+3. **Error Handling**: Follow step-specific strategies (`skip_optional`, `fail`, `retry_once`)
+
+**Implementation Approach** (`flow_control.implementation_approach`):
+When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
+1. **Sequential Execution**: Process steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
+2. **Dependency Resolution**: Wait for all steps listed in `depends_on` before starting
+3. **Variable References**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
+4. **Step Structure**:
+   - `step`: Step number (1, 2, 3...)
+   - `title`: Step title
+   - `description`: Detailed description with variable references
+   - `modification_points`: Test and code modification targets
+   - `logic_flow`: Test-fix iteration sequence
+   - `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
+   - `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
+   - `output`: Variable name for this step's output
+
+
 ### 1. Context Assessment & Test Discovery
 - Analyze task context to identify test files and source code paths
 - Load test framework configuration (Jest, Pytest, Mocha, etc.)
@@ -61,16 +85,34 @@ fi
 - Parse test results to identify failures
 
 ### 3. Failure Diagnosis & Fixing Loop
+
+**Execution Modes**:
+
+**A. Manual Mode (Default, meta.use_codex=false)**:
 ```
-WHILE tests are failing:
-    1. Analyze failure output
-    2. Identify root cause in source code
-    3. Modify source code to fix issue
-    4. Re-run affected tests
+WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
+    1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
+    2. Present fix recommendations to user
+    3. User applies fixes manually
+    4. Re-run test suite
     5. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
 END WHILE
 ```
 
+**B. Codex Mode (meta.use_codex=true)**:
+```
+WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
+    1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
+    2. Use Codex to apply fixes automatically with resume mechanism
+    3. Re-run test suite
+    4. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
+END WHILE
+```
+
+**Codex Resume in Test-Fix Cycle** (when `meta.use_codex=true`):
+- First iteration: Start new Codex session with full context
+- Subsequent iterations: Use `resume --last` to maintain fix history and apply consistent strategies
+
 ### 4. Code Quality Certification
 - All tests pass → Code is APPROVED ✅
 - Generate summary documenting:

.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md

@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: analyze
 description: Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen)
-usage: /cli:analyze [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] <analysis-target>
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
-examples:
-  - /cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
-  - /cli:analyze --tool qwen "API security"
-  - /cli:analyze --tool codex --enhance "performance bottlenecks"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Analyze Command (/cli:analyze)
@@ -28,12 +23,15 @@ Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code*
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--agent` - Use cli-execution-agent for automated context discovery (5-phase intelligent mode)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini, ignored in agent mode)
 - `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
 - `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
+### Standard Mode (Default)
+
 1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
 2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` first to expand user intent
 3. Auto-detect analysis type from keywords → select template
@@ -41,6 +39,32 @@ Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code*
 5. Execute analysis (read-only, no code changes)
 6. Return analysis report with insights and recommendations
 
+### Agent Mode (`--agent` flag)
+
+Delegate task to `cli-execution-agent` for intelligent execution with automated context discovery.
+
+**Agent invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Analyze codebase with automated context discovery",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${analysis_target}
+    Mode: analyze
+    Tool Preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    ${enhance_flag ? 'Enhance: true' : ''}
+
+    Agent will autonomously:
+    - Discover relevant files and patterns
+    - Build enhanced analysis prompt
+    - Select optimal tool and execute
+    - Route output to session/scratchpad
+  `
+)
+```
+
+The agent handles all phases internally (understanding, discovery, enhancement, execution, routing).
+
 ## File Pattern Auto-Detection
 
 Keywords trigger specific file patterns:
@@ -68,13 +92,24 @@ RULES: [auto-selected template] | Focus on [analysis aspect]
 
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Analysis**:
+**Basic Analysis (Standard Mode)**:
 ```bash
 /cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
 # Executes: Gemini analysis with auth file patterns
 # Returns: Pattern analysis, architecture insights, recommendations
 ```
 
+**Intelligent Analysis (Agent Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:analyze --agent "authentication patterns"
+# Phase 1: Classifies intent=analyze, complexity=simple, keywords=['auth', 'patterns']
+# Phase 2: MCP discovers 12 auth files, identifies patterns
+# Phase 3: Builds enhanced prompt with discovered context
+# Phase 4: Executes Gemini with comprehensive file references
+# Phase 5: Saves execution log with all 5 phases documented
+# Returns: Comprehensive analysis + detailed execution log
+```
+
 **Architecture Analysis**:
 ```bash
 /cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"

.claude/commands/cli/chat.md

@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: chat
 description: Simple CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
-usage: /cli:chat [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] "inquiry"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
-examples:
-  - /cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-  - /cli:chat --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
-  - /cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
@@ -29,13 +24,16 @@ Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - d
 ## Parameters
 
 - `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--agent` - Use cli-execution-agent for automated context discovery (5-phase intelligent mode)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini, ignored in agent mode)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt` first
 - `--all-files` - Include entire codebase in context
 - `--save-session` - Save interaction to workflow session
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
+### Standard Mode (Default)
+
 1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
 2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand user intent
 3. Assemble context: `@{CLAUDE.md}` + user-specified files or `--all-files`
@@ -43,6 +41,32 @@ Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - d
 5. Return explanations and insights (NO code changes)
 6. Optionally save to workflow session
 
+### Agent Mode (`--agent` flag)
+
+Delegate inquiry to `cli-execution-agent` for intelligent Q&A with automated context discovery.
+
+**Agent invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Answer question with automated context discovery",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${inquiry}
+    Mode: analyze (Q&A)
+    Tool Preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    ${all_files_flag ? 'Scope: all-files' : ''}
+
+    Agent will autonomously:
+    - Discover files relevant to the question
+    - Build Q&A prompt with precise context
+    - Execute and generate comprehensive answer
+    - Save conversation log
+  `
+)
+```
+
+The agent handles all phases internally.
+
 ## Context Assembly
 
 **Always included**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}` (project guidelines)
@@ -66,13 +90,24 @@ RESPONSE: Direct answer, explanation, insights (NO code modification)
 
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Question**:
+**Basic Question (Standard Mode)**:
 ```bash
 /cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
 # Executes: Gemini analysis
 # Returns: Explanation of auth flow, components involved, data flow
 ```
 
+**Intelligent Q&A (Agent Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --agent "how does JWT token refresh work in this codebase"
+# Phase 1: Understands inquiry = JWT refresh mechanism
+# Phase 2: Discovers JWT files, refresh logic, middleware patterns
+# Phase 3: Builds Q&A prompt with discovered implementation details
+# Phase 4: Executes Gemini with precise context for accurate answer
+# Phase 5: Saves conversation log with discovered context
+# Returns: Detailed answer with code references + execution log
+```
+
 **Architecture Question**:
 ```bash
 /cli:chat --tool qwen "how does React component optimization work here"

.claude/commands/cli/cli-init.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: cli-init
 description: Initialize CLI tool configurations (Gemini and Qwen) based on workspace analysis
-usage: /cli:cli-init [--tool <gemini|qwen|all>] [--output=<path>] [--preview]
 argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|all] [--output path] [--preview]"
-examples:
-  - /cli:cli-init
-  - /cli:cli-init --tool qwen
-  - /cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
-  - /cli:cli-init --output=.config/
 allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
@@ -452,4 +446,4 @@ docker-compose.override.yml
 | **Gemini-only workflow** | `/cli:cli-init --tool gemini` | Creates .gemini/ and .geminiignore only |
 | **Qwen-only workflow** | `/cli:cli-init --tool qwen` | Creates .qwen/ and .qwenignore only |
 | **Preview before commit** | `/cli:cli-init --preview` | Shows what would be generated |
-| **Update configurations** | `/cli:cli-init` | Regenerates all files with backups |
+| **Update configurations** | `/cli:cli-init` | Regenerates all files with backups |

.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: codex-execute
 description: Automated task decomposition and execution with Codex using resume mechanism
-usage: /cli:codex-execute [--verify-git] <task-description|task-id>
 argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
-  - /cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer"
-  - /cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/cli/discuss-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+---
+name: discuss-plan
+description: Orchestrates an iterative, multi-model discussion for planning and analysis without implementation.
+argument-hint: "[--topic '...'] [--task-id '...'] [--rounds N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Discuss-Plan Command (/cli:discuss-plan)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Orchestrates a multi-model collaborative discussion for in-depth planning and problem analysis. This command facilitates an iterative dialogue between Gemini, Codex, and Claude (the orchestrating AI) to explore a topic from multiple perspectives, refine ideas, and build a robust plan.
+
+**This command is for discussion and planning ONLY. It does NOT modify any code.**
+
+## Core Workflow: The Discussion Loop
+
+The command operates in iterative rounds, allowing the plan to evolve with each cycle. The user can choose to continue for more rounds or conclude when consensus is reached.
+
+```
+Topic Input → [Round 1: Gemini → Codex → Claude] → [User Review] →
+[Round 2: Gemini → Codex → Claude] → ... → Final Plan
+```
+
+### Model Roles & Priority
+
+**Priority Order**: Gemini > Codex > Claude
+
+1.  **Gemini (The Analyst)** - Priority 1
+    - Kicks off each round with deep analysis
+    - Provides foundational ideas and draft plans
+    - Analyzes current context or previous synthesis
+
+2.  **Codex (The Architect/Critic)** - Priority 2
+    - Reviews Gemini's output critically
+    - Uses deep reasoning for technical trade-offs
+    - Proposes alternative strategies
+    - **Participates purely in conversational/reasoning capacity**
+    - Uses resume mechanism to maintain discussion context
+
+3.  **Claude (The Synthesizer/Moderator)** - Priority 3
+    - Synthesizes discussion from Gemini and Codex
+    - Highlights agreements and contentions
+    - Structures refined plan
+    - Poses key questions for next round
+
+## Parameters
+
+-   `<input>` (Required): Topic description or task ID (e.g., "Design a new caching layer" or `PLAN-002`)
+-   `--rounds <N>` (Optional): Maximum number of discussion rounds (default: prompts after each round)
+-   `--task-id <id>` (Optional): Associates discussion with workflow task ID
+-   `--topic <description>` (Optional): High-level topic for discussion
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Initial Setup
+
+1.  **Input Processing**: Parse topic or task ID
+2.  **Context Gathering**: Identify relevant files based on topic
+
+### Phase 2: Discussion Round
+
+Each round consists of three sequential steps, tracked via `TodoWrite`.
+
+**Step 1: Gemini's Analysis (Priority 1)**
+
+Gemini analyzes the topic and proposes preliminary plan.
+
+```bash
+# Round 1: CONTEXT_INPUT is the initial topic
+# Subsequent rounds: CONTEXT_INPUT is the synthesis from previous round
+~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze and propose a plan for '[topic]'
+TASK: Provide initial analysis, identify key modules, and draft implementation plan
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
+INPUT: [CONTEXT_INPUT]
+EXPECTED: Structured analysis and draft plan for discussion
+RULES: Focus on technical depth and practical considerations
+"
+```
+
+**Step 2: Codex's Critique (Priority 2)**
+
+Codex reviews Gemini's output using conversational reasoning. Uses `resume --last` to maintain context across rounds.
+
+```bash
+# First round (new session)
+codex --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: Critically review technical plan
+TASK: Review the provided plan, identify weaknesses, suggest alternatives, reason about trade-offs
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [relevant files]
+INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis]
+EXPECTED: Critical review with alternative ideas and risk analysis
+RULES: Focus on architectural soundness and implementation feasibility
+" --skip-git-repo-check
+
+# Subsequent rounds (resume discussion)
+codex --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: Re-evaluate plan based on latest synthesis
+TASK: Review updated plan and discussion points, provide further critique or refined ideas
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: Previous discussion context (maintained via resume)
+INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis for current round]
+EXPECTED: Updated critique building on previous discussion
+RULES: Build on previous insights, avoid repeating points
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check
+```
+
+**Step 3: Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)**
+
+Claude (orchestrating AI) synthesizes both outputs:
+
+-   Summarizes Gemini's proposal and Codex's critique
+-   Highlights agreements and disagreements
+-   Structures consolidated plan
+-   Presents open questions for next round
+-   This synthesis becomes input for next round
+
+### Phase 3: User Review and Iteration
+
+1.  **Present Synthesis**: Show synthesized plan and key discussion points
+2.  **Continue or Conclude**: Prompt user:
+    - **(1)** Start another round of discussion
+    - **(2)** Conclude and finalize the plan
+3.  **Loop or Finalize**:
+    -   Continue → New round with Gemini analyzing latest synthesis
+    -   Conclude → Save final synthesized document
+
+## TodoWrite Tracking
+
+Progress tracked for each round and model.
+
+```javascript
+// Example for 2-round discussion
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    // Round 1
+    { content: "[Round 1] Gemini: Analyzing topic", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing with Gemini" },
+    { content: "[Round 1] Codex: Critiquing plan", status: "completed", activeForm: "Critiquing with Codex" },
+    { content: "[Round 1] Claude: Synthesizing discussion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Synthesizing discussion" },
+    { content: "[User Action] Review Round 1 and decide next step", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Awaiting user decision" },
+
+    // Round 2
+    { content: "[Round 2] Gemini: Analyzing refined plan", status: "pending", activeForm: "Analyzing refined plan" },
+    { content: "[Round 2] Codex: Re-evaluating plan [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Re-evaluating with Codex" },
+    { content: "[Round 2] Claude: Finalizing plan", status: "pending", activeForm: "Finalizing plan" },
+    { content: "Discussion complete - Final plan generated", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating final document" }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+-   **Primary Log**: Entire multi-round discussion logged to single file:
+    -   `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/discuss-plan-[topic]-[timestamp].md`
+-   **Final Plan**: Clean final version saved upon conclusion:
+    -   `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/plan-[topic].md`
+-   **Scratchpad**: If no session active:
+    -   `.workflow/.scratchpad/discuss-plan-[topic]-[timestamp].md`
+
+## Discussion Structure
+
+Each round's output is structured as:
+
+```markdown
+## Round N: [Topic]
+
+### Gemini's Analysis (Priority 1)
+[Gemini's full analysis and proposal]
+
+### Codex's Critique (Priority 2)
+[Codex's critical review and alternatives]
+
+### Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)
+**Points of Agreement:**
+- [Agreement 1]
+- [Agreement 2]
+
+**Points of Contention:**
+- [Issue 1]: Gemini suggests X, Codex suggests Y
+- [Issue 2]: Trade-off between A and B
+
+**Consolidated Plan:**
+[Structured plan incorporating both perspectives]
+
+**Open Questions for Next Round:**
+1. [Question 1]
+2. [Question 2]
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Multi-Round Architecture Discussion
+
+**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Design a real-time notification system"`
+
+**Round 1**:
+1.  **Gemini**: Proposes WebSocket-based architecture with RabbitMQ message queue
+2.  **Codex**: Critiques as overly complex for MVP. Suggests Server-Sent Events (SSE) for simplicity (one-way notifications). Questions RabbitMQ necessity, proposes simpler Redis Pub/Sub
+3.  **Claude**: Synthesizes views:
+    -   **Plan A (Gemini)**: WebSockets + RabbitMQ (highly scalable, complex)
+    -   **Plan B (Codex)**: SSE + Redis (simpler, less overhead)
+    -   **Open Question**: Is bi-directional communication critical, or is simplicity priority?
+4.  **User Action**: Opts for another round to explore trade-offs
+
+**Round 2**:
+1.  **Gemini**: Analyzes synthesized document. Notes that if features like "user is typing" indicators are roadmapped, WebSockets better long-term. Drafts plan starting with SSE/Redis but designing for easy migration
+2.  **Codex**: Reviews migration plan. Reasons that migration itself could be complex. If feature set likely to expand, starting with WebSockets using managed service might be best cost/benefit
+3.  **Claude**: Synthesizes new discussion:
+    -   **Consensus**: Simple SSE/Redis too short-sighted
+    -   **Refined Options**:
+        1.  Phased approach (SSE → WebSocket) with clear migration plan
+        2.  Direct WebSocket with managed service (Pusher, Ably) to reduce ops overhead
+    -   **Recommendation**: Option 2 most robust and future-proof
+4.  **User Action**: Agrees with recommendation, concludes discussion
+
+**Final Output**: Planning document saved with:
+- Chosen architecture (Managed WebSocket service)
+- Multi-round reasoning
+- High-level implementation steps
+
+### Example 2: Feature Design Discussion
+
+**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Design user permission system" --rounds 2`
+
+**Round 1**:
+1.  **Gemini**: Proposes RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) with predefined roles
+2.  **Codex**: Suggests ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) for more flexibility
+3.  **Claude**: Synthesizes trade-offs between simplicity (RBAC) vs flexibility (ABAC)
+
+**Round 2**:
+1.  **Gemini**: Analyzes hybrid approach - RBAC for core permissions, attributes for fine-grained control
+2.  **Codex**: Reviews hybrid model, identifies implementation challenges
+3.  **Claude**: Final plan with phased rollout strategy
+
+**Automatic Conclusion**: Command concludes after 2 rounds as specified
+
+### Example 3: Problem-Solving Discussion
+
+**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Debug memory leak in data pipeline" --task-id ISSUE-042`
+
+**Round 1**:
+1.  **Gemini**: Identifies potential leak sources (unclosed handles, growing cache, event listeners)
+2.  **Codex**: Adds profiling tool recommendations, suggests memory monitoring
+3.  **Claude**: Structures debugging plan with phased approach
+
+**User Decision**: Single round sufficient, concludes with debugging strategy
+
+## Consensus Mechanisms
+
+**When to Continue:**
+- Significant disagreement between models
+- Open questions requiring deeper analysis
+- Trade-offs need more exploration
+- User wants additional perspectives
+
+**When to Conclude:**
+- Models converge on solution
+- All key questions addressed
+- User satisfied with plan depth
+- Maximum rounds reached (if specified)
+
+## Comparison with Other Commands
+
+| Command | Models | Rounds | Discussion | Implementation | Use Case |
+|---------|--------|--------|------------|----------------|----------|
+| `/cli:mode:plan` | Gemini | 1 | ❌ NO | ❌ NO | Single-model planning |
+| `/cli:analyze` | Gemini/Qwen | 1 | ❌ NO | ❌ NO | Code analysis |
+| `/cli:execute` | Any | 1 | ❌ NO | ✅ YES | Direct implementation |
+| `/cli:codex-execute` | Codex | 1 | ❌ NO | ✅ YES | Multi-stage implementation |
+| `/cli:discuss-plan` | **Gemini+Codex+Claude** | **Multiple** | ✅ **YES** | ❌ **NO** | **Multi-perspective planning** |
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1.  **Use for Complex Decisions**: Ideal for architectural decisions, design trade-offs, problem-solving
+2.  **Start with Broad Topic**: Let first round establish scope, subsequent rounds refine
+3.  **Review Each Synthesis**: Claude's synthesis is key decision point - review carefully
+4.  **Know When to Stop**: Don't over-iterate - 2-3 rounds usually sufficient
+5.  **Task Association**: Use `--task-id` for traceability in workflow
+6.  **Save Intermediate Results**: Each round's synthesis saved automatically
+7.  **Let Models Disagree**: Divergent views often reveal important trade-offs
+8.  **Focus Questions**: Use Claude's open questions to guide next round
+
+## Breaking Discussion Loops
+
+**Detecting Loops:**
+- Models repeating same arguments
+- No new insights emerging
+- Trade-offs well understood
+
+**Breaking Strategies:**
+1.  **User Decision**: Make executive decision when enough info gathered
+2.  **Timeboxing**: Set max rounds upfront with `--rounds`
+3.  **Criteria-Based**: Define decision criteria before starting
+4.  **Hybrid Approach**: Accept multiple valid solutions in final plan
+
+## Notes
+
+-   **Pure Discussion**: This command NEVER modifies code - only produces planning documents
+-   **Codex Role**: Codex participates as reasoning/critique tool, not executor
+-   **Resume Context**: Codex maintains discussion context via `resume --last`
+-   **Priority System**: Ensures Gemini leads analysis, Codex provides critique, Claude synthesizes
+-   **Output Quality**: Multi-perspective discussion produces more robust plans than single-model analysis
+-   Command patterns and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+-   Output routing details: see workflow-architecture.md
+-   For implementation after discussion, use `/cli:execute` or `/cli:codex-execute` separately

.claude/commands/cli/execute.md

@@ -1,14 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: execute
 description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference
-usage: /cli:execute [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] <description|task-id>
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /cli:execute "implement user authentication system"
-  - /cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
-  - /cli:execute --tool codex IMPL-001
-  - /cli:execute --enhance "fix API performance issues"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
@@ -45,6 +39,10 @@ Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summar
 - Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
 - Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
 
+**3. Agent Mode** (`--agent` flag):
+- Input: Description or task-id
+- Process: 5-Phase Workflow → Context Discovery → Optimal Tool Selection → Execute
+
 ### Context Inference
 
 Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology:
@@ -70,7 +68,8 @@ Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--agent` - Use cli-execution-agent for automated context discovery (5-phase intelligent mode)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini, ignored in agent mode unless specified)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
 - `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
 - `--debug` - Verbose logging
@@ -107,8 +106,9 @@ Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See
 - No session, ad-hoc implementation:
   - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143045.md`
 
-## Command Template
+## Execution Modes
 
+### Standard Mode (Default)
 ```bash
 # Gemini/Qwen: MODE=write with --approval-mode yolo
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
@@ -130,15 +130,52 @@ EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
 " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 ```
 
+### Agent Mode (`--agent` flag)
+
+Delegate implementation to `cli-execution-agent` for intelligent execution with automated context discovery.
+
+**Agent invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Implement with automated context discovery and optimal tool selection",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${description_or_task_id}
+    Mode: execute
+    Tool Preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    ${enhance_flag ? 'Enhance: true' : ''}
+
+    Agent will autonomously:
+    - Discover implementation files and dependencies
+    - Assess complexity and select optimal tool
+    - Execute with YOLO permissions (auto-approve)
+    - Generate task summary if task-id provided
+  `
+)
+```
+
+The agent handles all phases internally, including complexity-based tool selection.
+
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+**Basic Implementation (Standard Mode)** (⚠️ modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
 # Executes: Creates auth middleware, updates routes, modifies config
 # Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
 ```
 
+**Intelligent Implementation (Agent Mode)** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute --agent "implement OAuth2 authentication with token refresh"
+# Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=complex, keywords=['oauth2', 'auth', 'token', 'refresh']
+# Phase 2: MCP discovers auth patterns, existing middleware, JWT dependencies
+# Phase 3: Enhances prompt with discovered patterns and best practices
+# Phase 4: Selects Codex (complex task), executes with comprehensive context
+# Phase 5: Saves execution log + generates implementation summary
+# Result: Complete OAuth2 implementation + detailed execution log
+```
+
 **Enhanced Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: bug-index
 description: Bug analysis and fix suggestions using CLI tools
-usage: /cli:mode:bug-index [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "bug description"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
-examples:
-  - /cli:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error"
-  - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool qwen --enhance "login not working"
-  - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "token validation fails"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Bug Index (/cli:mode:bug-index)
@@ -21,13 +16,16 @@ Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bu
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--agent` - Use cli-execution-agent for automated context discovery (5-phase intelligent mode)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini, ignored in agent mode)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt` first
 - `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
 - `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error message
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
+### Standard Mode (Default)
+
 1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
 2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[bug-description]"` first
 3. Parse bug description (original or enhanced)
@@ -36,6 +34,33 @@ Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bu
 6. Execute analysis (read-only, provides fix recommendations)
 7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
 
+### Agent Mode (`--agent` flag)
+
+Delegate bug analysis to `cli-execution-agent` for intelligent debugging with automated context discovery.
+
+**Agent invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Analyze bug with automated context discovery",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${bug_description}
+    Mode: debug (bug analysis)
+    Tool Preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    ${cd_flag ? `Directory Scope: ${cd_path}` : ''}
+    Template: bug-fix
+
+    Agent will autonomously:
+    - Discover bug-related files and error traces
+    - Build debug prompt with bug-fix template
+    - Execute analysis and provide fix recommendations
+    - Save analysis log
+  `
+)
+```
+
+The agent handles all phases internally.
+
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes bugs and suggests fixes - it does NOT modify code
@@ -66,7 +91,25 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
 
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Bug Analysis**:
+**Basic Bug Analysis (Standard Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:mode:bug-index "null pointer error in login flow"
+# Executes: Gemini with bug-fix template
+# Returns: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations
+```
+
+**Intelligent Bug Analysis (Agent Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:mode:bug-index --agent "intermittent token validation failure"
+# Phase 1: Classifies as debug task, extracts keywords ['token', 'validation', 'failure']
+# Phase 2: MCP discovers token validation code, middleware, test files with errors
+# Phase 3: Builds debug prompt with bug-fix template + discovered error patterns
+# Phase 4: Executes Gemini with comprehensive bug context
+# Phase 5: Saves analysis log with detailed fix recommendations
+# Returns: Root cause analysis + code path traces + minimal fix suggestions
+```
+
+**Standard Template Example**:
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: Debug authentication null pointer error

.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md

@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: code-analysis
 description: Deep code analysis and debugging using CLI tools with specialized template
-usage: /cli:mode:code-analysis [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "analysis target"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
-examples:
-  - /cli:mode:code-analysis "analyze authentication flow logic"
-  - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen --enhance "explain data transformation pipeline"
-  - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex --cd "src/core" "trace execution path for user registration"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
@@ -21,13 +16,16 @@ Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--agent` - Use cli-execution-agent for automated context discovery (5-phase intelligent mode)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini, ignored in agent mode)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
 - `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
 - `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
+### Standard Mode (Default)
+
 1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
 2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[analysis-target]"` first
 3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
@@ -36,6 +34,33 @@ Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt
 6. Execute deep analysis (read-only, no code modification)
 7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
 
+### Agent Mode (`--agent` flag)
+
+Delegate code analysis to `cli-execution-agent` for intelligent execution path tracing with automated context discovery.
+
+**Agent invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Analyze code execution paths with automated context discovery",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${analysis_target}
+    Mode: code-analysis (execution tracing)
+    Tool Preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    ${cd_flag ? `Directory Scope: ${cd_path}` : ''}
+    Template: code-analysis
+
+    Agent will autonomously:
+    - Discover execution paths and call flows
+    - Build analysis prompt with code-analysis template
+    - Execute deep tracing analysis
+    - Generate call diagrams and save log
+  `
+)
+```
+
+The agent handles all phases internally.
+
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes code and provides insights - it does NOT modify code
@@ -69,7 +94,25 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [aspect]
 
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Code Analysis**:
+**Basic Code Analysis (Standard Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace authentication execution flow"
+# Executes: Gemini with code-analysis template
+# Returns: Execution trace, call diagram, debugging insights
+```
+
+**Intelligent Code Analysis (Agent Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:mode:code-analysis --agent "trace JWT token validation from request to database"
+# Phase 1: Classifies as deep analysis, keywords ['jwt', 'token', 'validation', 'database']
+# Phase 2: MCP discovers request handler → middleware → service → repository chain
+# Phase 3: Builds analysis prompt with code-analysis template + complete call path
+# Phase 4: Executes Gemini with traced execution paths
+# Phase 5: Saves detailed analysis with call flow diagrams and variable states
+# Returns: Complete execution trace + call diagram + data flow analysis
+```
+
+**Standard Template Example**:
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: Trace authentication execution flow

.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: plan
 description: Project planning and architecture analysis using CLI tools
-usage: /cli:mode:plan [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "topic"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
-examples:
-  - /cli:mode:plan "design user dashboard"
-  - /cli:mode:plan --tool qwen --enhance "plan microservices migration"
-  - /cli:mode:plan --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "authentication system"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
@@ -21,13 +16,16 @@ Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning templat
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--agent` - Use cli-execution-agent for automated context discovery (5-phase intelligent mode)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini, ignored in agent mode)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance topic with `/enhance-prompt` first
 - `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
 - `<topic>` (Required) - Planning topic or architectural question
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
+### Standard Mode (Default)
+
 1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
 2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[topic]"` first
 3. Parse topic (original or enhanced)
@@ -36,6 +34,33 @@ Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning templat
 6. Execute analysis (read-only, no code modification)
 7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
 
+### Agent Mode (`--agent` flag)
+
+Delegate planning to `cli-execution-agent` for intelligent strategic planning with automated architecture discovery.
+
+**Agent invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Create strategic plan with automated architecture discovery",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${planning_topic}
+    Mode: plan (strategic planning)
+    Tool Preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    ${cd_flag ? `Directory Scope: ${cd_path}` : ''}
+    Template: plan
+
+    Agent will autonomously:
+    - Discover project structure and existing architecture
+    - Build planning prompt with plan template
+    - Execute strategic planning analysis
+    - Generate implementation roadmap and save
+  `
+)
+```
+
+The agent handles all phases internally.
+
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Analysis Only**: This command provides planning recommendations and insights - it does NOT modify code
@@ -67,7 +92,25 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on [topic area]
 
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Planning Analysis**:
+**Basic Planning Analysis (Standard Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:mode:plan "design user dashboard architecture"
+# Executes: Gemini with planning template
+# Returns: Architecture recommendations, component design, roadmap
+```
+
+**Intelligent Planning (Agent Mode)**:
+```bash
+/cli:mode:plan --agent "design microservices architecture for payment system"
+# Phase 1: Classifies as architectural planning, keywords ['microservices', 'payment', 'architecture']
+# Phase 2: MCP discovers existing services, payment flows, integration patterns
+# Phase 3: Builds planning prompt with plan template + current architecture context
+# Phase 4: Executes Gemini with comprehensive project understanding
+# Phase 5: Saves planning document with implementation roadmap and migration strategy
+# Returns: Strategic architecture plan + implementation roadmap + risk assessment
+```
+
+**Standard Template Example**:
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: Design user dashboard architecture

.claude/commands/enhance-prompt.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: enhance-prompt
 description: Context-aware prompt enhancement using session memory and codebase analysis
-usage: /enhance-prompt <user_input>
 argument-hint: "user input to enhance"
-examples:
-  - /enhance-prompt "add user profile editing"
-  - /enhance-prompt "fix login button"
-  - /enhance-prompt "clean up the payment code"
 ---
 
 ## Overview
@@ -36,7 +31,7 @@ FUNCTION should_use_gemini(user_prompt):
 END
 ```
 
-**Gemini Integration:** @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
+**Gemini Integration:** ~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
 
 ## Enhancement Rules
 

.claude/commands/memory/docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,828 @@
+---
+name: docs
+description: Documentation planning and orchestration - creates structured documentation tasks for execution
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-generate]"
+---
+
+# Documentation Workflow (/memory:docs)
+
+## Overview
+Lightweight planner that analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. Does NOT generate documentation content itself - delegates to doc-generator agent.
+
+**Documentation Output**: All generated documentation is placed in `.workflow/docs/` directory with **mirrored project structure**. For example:
+- Source: `src/modules/auth/index.ts` → Docs: `.workflow/docs/src/modules/auth/API.md`
+- Source: `lib/core/utils.js` → Docs: `.workflow/docs/lib/core/README.md`
+
+**Two Execution Modes**:
+- **Default**: CLI analyzes in `pre_analysis` (MODE=analysis), agent writes docs in `implementation_approach`
+- **--cli-generate**: CLI generates docs in `implementation_approach` (MODE=write)
+
+## Path Mirroring Strategy
+
+**Principle**: Documentation structure **mirrors** source code structure.
+
+| Source Path | Documentation Path |
+|------------|-------------------|
+| `src/modules/auth/index.ts` | `.workflow/docs/src/modules/auth/API.md` |
+| `src/modules/auth/middleware/` | `.workflow/docs/src/modules/auth/middleware/README.md` |
+| `lib/core/utils.js` | `.workflow/docs/lib/core/API.md` |
+| `lib/core/helpers/` | `.workflow/docs/lib/core/helpers/README.md` |
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Easy to locate documentation for any source file
+- Maintains logical organization
+- Clear 1:1 mapping between code and docs
+- Supports any project structure (src/, lib/, packages/, etc.)
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:docs [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-generate]
+```
+
+- **path**: Target directory (default: current directory)
+  - Specifies the directory to generate documentation for
+
+- **--mode**: Documentation generation mode (default: full)
+  - `full`: Complete documentation (modules + project README + ARCHITECTURE + EXAMPLES)
+    - Level 1: Module tree documentation
+    - Level 2: Project README.md
+    - Level 3: ARCHITECTURE.md + EXAMPLES.md + HTTP API (optional)
+  - `partial`: Module documentation only
+    - Level 1: Module tree documentation (API.md + README.md)
+    - Skips project-level documentation
+
+- **--tool**: CLI tool selection (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
+
+- **--cli-generate**: Enable CLI-based documentation generation (optional)
+  - When enabled: CLI generates docs with MODE=write in implementation_approach
+  - When disabled (default): CLI analyzes with MODE=analysis in pre_analysis
+
+## Planning Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Initialize Session
+
+#### Step 1: Create Session and Generate Config
+```bash
+# Create session structure and initialize config in one step
+bash(
+  # Parse arguments
+  path="${1:-.}"
+  tool="gemini"
+  mode="full"
+  cli_generate=false
+  shift
+  while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
+    case "$1" in
+      --tool) tool="$2"; shift 2 ;;
+      --mode) mode="$2"; shift 2 ;;
+      --cli-generate) cli_generate=true; shift ;;
+      *) shift ;;
+    esac
+  done
+
+  # Detect paths
+  project_root=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
+  if [[ "$path" == /* ]] || [[ "$path" == [A-Z]:* ]]; then
+    target_path="$path"
+  else
+    target_path=$(cd "$path" 2>/dev/null && pwd || echo "$PWD/$path")
+  fi
+
+  # Create session
+  timestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+  session="WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
+  mkdir -p ".workflow/${session}"/{.task,.process,.summaries}
+  touch ".workflow/.active-${session}"
+
+  # Generate single config file with all info
+  cat > ".workflow/${session}/.process/config.json" <<EOF
+{
+  "session_id": "${session}",
+  "timestamp": "$(date -Iseconds)",
+  "path": "${path}",
+  "target_path": "${target_path}",
+  "project_root": "${project_root}",
+  "mode": "${mode}",
+  "tool": "${tool}",
+  "cli_generate": ${cli_generate}
+}
+EOF
+
+  echo "✓ Session initialized: ${session}"
+  echo "✓ Target: ${target_path}"
+  echo "✓ Mode: ${mode}"
+  echo "✓ Tool: ${tool}, CLI generate: ${cli_generate}"
+)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```
+✓ Session initialized: WFS-docs-20240120-143022
+✓ Target: /d/Claude_dms3
+✓ Mode: full
+✓ Tool: gemini, CLI generate: false
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analyze Structure
+
+#### Step 1: Discover and Classify Folders
+```bash
+# Run analysis pipeline (module discovery + folder classification)
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh > .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt)
+```
+
+**Output Sample** (folder-analysis.txt):
+```
+./src/modules/auth|code|code:5|dirs:2
+./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
+./src/utils|navigation|code:0|dirs:4
+```
+
+#### Step 2: Extract Top-Level Directories
+```bash
+# Group folders by top-level directory
+bash(awk -F'|' '{
+  path = $1
+  gsub(/^\.\//, "", path)
+  split(path, parts, "/")
+  if (length(parts) >= 2) print parts[1] "/" parts[2]
+  else if (length(parts) == 1 && parts[1] != ".") print parts[1]
+}' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt | sort -u > .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/top-level-dirs.txt)
+```
+
+**Output** (top-level-dirs.txt):
+```
+src/modules
+src/utils
+lib/core
+```
+
+#### Step 3: Generate Analysis Summary
+```bash
+# Calculate statistics
+bash(
+  total=$(wc -l < .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt)
+  code_count=$(grep '|code|' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt | wc -l)
+  nav_count=$(grep '|navigation|' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt | wc -l)
+  top_dirs=$(wc -l < .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/top-level-dirs.txt)
+
+  echo "📊 Folder Analysis Complete:"
+  echo "  - Total folders: $total"
+  echo "  - Code folders: $code_count"
+  echo "  - Navigation folders: $nav_count"
+  echo "  - Top-level dirs: $top_dirs"
+)
+
+# Update config with statistics
+bash(jq '. + {analysis: {total: "15", code: "8", navigation: "7", top_level: "3"}}' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json > .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json.tmp && mv .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json.tmp .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Detect Update Mode
+
+#### Step 1: Count Existing Documentation in .workflow/docs/
+```bash
+# Check .workflow/docs/ directory and count existing files
+bash(if [[ -d ".workflow/docs" ]]; then
+  find .workflow/docs -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+else
+  echo "0"
+fi)
+```
+
+**Output**: `5` (existing docs in .workflow/docs/)
+
+#### Step 2: List Existing Documentation
+```bash
+# List existing files in .workflow/docs/ (for task context)
+bash(if [[ -d ".workflow/docs" ]]; then
+  find .workflow/docs -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null > .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/existing-docs.txt
+else
+  touch .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/existing-docs.txt
+fi)
+```
+
+**Output** (existing-docs.txt):
+```
+.workflow/docs/src/modules/auth/API.md
+.workflow/docs/src/modules/auth/README.md
+.workflow/docs/lib/core/README.md
+.workflow/docs/README.md
+```
+
+#### Step 3: Update Config with Update Status
+```bash
+# Determine update status (create or update) and update config
+bash(
+  existing_count=$(find .workflow/docs -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+  if [[ $existing_count -gt 0 ]]; then
+    jq ". + {update_mode: \"update\", existing_docs: $existing_count}" .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json > .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json.tmp && mv .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json.tmp .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json
+  else
+    jq '. + {update_mode: "create", existing_docs: 0}' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json > .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json.tmp && mv .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json.tmp .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json
+  fi
+)
+
+# Display strategy summary
+bash(
+  mode=$(jq -r '.mode' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+  update_mode=$(jq -r '.update_mode' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+  existing=$(jq -r '.existing_docs' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+  tool=$(jq -r '.tool' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+  cli_gen=$(jq -r '.cli_generate' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+
+  echo "📋 Documentation Strategy:"
+  echo "  - Path: $(jq -r '.target_path' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)"
+  echo "  - Mode: $mode ($([ "$mode" = "full" ] && echo "complete docs" || echo "modules only"))"
+  echo "  - Update: $update_mode ($existing existing files)"
+  echo "  - Tool: $tool, CLI generate: $cli_gen"
+)
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Decompose Tasks
+
+#### Task Hierarchy
+```
+Level 1: Module Trees (always, parallel execution)
+  ├─ IMPL-001: Document 'src/modules/'
+  ├─ IMPL-002: Document 'src/utils/'
+  └─ IMPL-003: Document 'lib/'
+
+Level 2: Project README (mode=full only, depends on Level 1)
+  └─ IMPL-004: Generate Project README
+
+Level 3: Architecture & Examples (mode=full only, depends on Level 2)
+  ├─ IMPL-005: Generate ARCHITECTURE.md + EXAMPLES.md
+  └─ IMPL-006: Generate HTTP API (optional)
+```
+
+#### Step 1: Generate Level 1 Tasks (Module Trees)
+```bash
+# Read top-level directories and create tasks
+bash(
+  task_count=0
+  while read -r top_dir; do
+    task_count=$((task_count + 1))
+    task_id=$(printf "IMPL-%03d" $task_count)
+    echo "Creating $task_id for '$top_dir'"
+    # Generate task JSON (see Task Templates section)
+  done < .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/top-level-dirs.txt
+)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```
+Creating IMPL-001 for 'src/modules'
+Creating IMPL-002 for 'src/utils'
+Creating IMPL-003 for 'lib'
+```
+
+#### Step 2: Generate Level 2-3 Tasks (Full Mode Only)
+```bash
+# Check documentation mode
+bash(jq -r '.mode' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+
+# If full mode, create project-level tasks
+bash(
+  mode=$(jq -r '.mode' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+  if [[ "$mode" == "full" ]]; then
+    echo "Creating IMPL-004: Project README"
+    echo "Creating IMPL-005: ARCHITECTURE.md + EXAMPLES.md"
+    # Optional: Check for HTTP API endpoints
+    if grep -r "router\.|@Get\|@Post" src/ >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+      echo "Creating IMPL-006: HTTP API docs"
+    fi
+  else
+    echo "Partial mode: Skipping project-level tasks"
+  fi
+)
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Task JSONs
+
+#### Step 1: Extract Configuration
+```bash
+# Read config values from JSON
+bash(jq -r '.tool' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+bash(jq -r '.cli_generate' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+```
+
+**Output**: `tool=gemini`, `cli_generate=false`
+
+#### Step 2: Determine CLI Command Strategy
+```bash
+# Determine MODE and placement based on cli_generate flag
+bash(
+  cli_generate=$(jq -r '.cli_generate' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+
+  if [[ "$cli_generate" == "true" ]]; then
+    echo "mode=write"
+    echo "placement=implementation_approach"
+    echo "approval_flag=--approval-mode yolo"
+  else
+    echo "mode=analysis"
+    echo "placement=pre_analysis"
+    echo "approval_flag="
+  fi
+)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```
+mode=analysis
+placement=pre_analysis
+approval_flag=
+```
+
+#### Step 3: Build Tool-Specific Commands
+```bash
+# Generate command templates based on tool selection
+bash(
+  tool=$(jq -r '.tool' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+
+  if [[ "$tool" == "codex" ]]; then
+    echo "codex -C \${dir} --full-auto exec \"...\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access"
+  else
+    echo "bash(cd \${dir} && ~/.claude/scripts/${tool}-wrapper ${approval_flag} -p \"...\")"
+  fi
+)
+```
+
+## Task Templates
+
+### Level 1: Module Tree Task
+
+**Path Mapping**: Source `src/modules/` → Output `.workflow/docs/src/modules/`
+
+**Default Mode (cli_generate=false)**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Document Module Tree: 'src/modules/'",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs-tree",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_generate": false,
+    "source_path": "src/modules",
+    "output_path": ".workflow/docs/src/modules"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Analyze source code in src/modules/",
+      "Generate docs to .workflow/docs/src/modules/ (mirrored structure)",
+      "For code folders: generate API.md + README.md",
+      "For navigation folders: generate README.md only"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/modules"],
+    "folder_analysis_file": "${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_docs",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/${top_dir} -name '*.md' 2>/dev/null | xargs cat || echo 'No existing docs')",
+        "output_to": "existing_module_docs"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_folder_analysis",
+        "command": "bash(grep '^src/modules' ${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt)",
+        "output_to": "target_folders"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_module_tree",
+        "command": "bash(cd src/modules && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze module structure\\nTASK: Generate documentation outline\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*} [target_folders]\\nEXPECTED: Structure outline\\nRULES: Analyze only\")",
+        "output_to": "tree_outline",
+        "note": "CLI for analysis only"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate module tree documentation",
+        "description": "Analyze source folders and generate docs to .workflow/docs/ with mirrored structure",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse folder types from [target_folders]",
+          "Parse structure from [tree_outline]",
+          "For src/modules/auth/ → write to .workflow/docs/src/modules/auth/",
+          "Generate API.md for code folders",
+          "Generate README.md for all folders"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Parse [target_folders] to get folder types",
+          "Parse [tree_outline] for structure",
+          "For each folder in source:",
+          "  - Map source_path to .workflow/docs/{source_path}",
+          "  - If type == 'code': Generate API.md + README.md",
+          "  - Elif type == 'navigation': Generate README.md only"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "module_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${top_dir}/*/API.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/${top_dir}/*/README.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**CLI Generate Mode (cli_generate=true)**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Document Module Tree: 'src/modules/'",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs-tree",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_generate": true,
+    "source_path": "src/modules",
+    "output_path": ".workflow/docs/src/modules"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Analyze source code in src/modules/",
+      "Generate docs to .workflow/docs/src/modules/ (mirrored structure)",
+      "CLI generates documentation files directly"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/modules"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_docs",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/${top_dir} -name '*.md' 2>/dev/null | xargs cat || echo 'No existing docs')",
+        "output_to": "existing_module_docs"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_folder_analysis",
+        "command": "bash(grep '^src/modules' ${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt)",
+        "output_to": "target_folders"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Parse folder analysis",
+        "description": "Parse [target_folders] to get folder types and structure",
+        "modification_points": ["Extract folder types", "Identify code vs navigation folders"],
+        "logic_flow": ["Parse [target_folders] to get folder types", "Prepare folder list for CLI generation"],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "folder_types"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": 2,
+        "title": "Generate documentation via CLI",
+        "description": "Call CLI to generate docs to .workflow/docs/ with mirrored structure using MODE=write",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Execute CLI generation command",
+          "Generate files to .workflow/docs/src/modules/ (mirrored path)",
+          "Generate API.md and README.md files"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "CLI analyzes source code in src/modules/",
+          "CLI writes documentation to .workflow/docs/src/modules/",
+          "Maintains directory structure mirroring"
+        ],
+        "command": "bash(cd src/modules && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p \"PURPOSE: Generate module docs\\nTASK: Create documentation files in .workflow/docs/src/modules/\\nMODE: write\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*} [target_folders] [existing_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: API.md and README.md in .workflow/docs/src/modules/\\nRULES: Mirror source structure, generate complete docs\")",
+        "depends_on": [1],
+        "output": "generated_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${top_dir}/*/API.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/${top_dir}/*/README.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 2: Project README Task
+
+**Default Mode**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-004",
+  "title": "Generate Project README",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-002", "IMPL-003"],
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_generate": false
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_readme",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing README')",
+        "output_to": "existing_readme"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_module_docs",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/README.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/api/*' | xargs cat)",
+        "output_to": "all_module_docs",
+        "note": "Load all module docs from mirrored structure"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_project",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project structure\\nTASK: Extract overview from modules\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Project outline\")",
+        "output_to": "project_outline"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate project README",
+        "description": "Generate project README with navigation links while preserving existing user modifications",
+        "modification_points": ["Parse [project_outline] and [all_module_docs]", "Generate project README structure", "Add navigation links to modules", "Preserve [existing_readme] user modifications"],
+        "logic_flow": ["Parse [project_outline] and [all_module_docs]", "Generate project README with navigation links", "Preserve [existing_readme] user modifications"],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "project_readme"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 3: Architecture & Examples Documentation Task
+
+**Default Mode**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-005",
+  "title": "Generate Architecture & Examples Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-004"],
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_generate": false
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_docs",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing ARCHITECTURE'; echo '---SEPARATOR---'; cat .workflow/docs/EXAMPLES.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing EXAMPLES')",
+        "output_to": "existing_arch_examples"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_all_docs",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/README.md && find .workflow/docs -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/README.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/api/*' | xargs cat)",
+        "output_to": "all_docs",
+        "note": "Load README + all module docs from mirrored structure"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_architecture_and_examples",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze system architecture and generate examples\\nTASK: Synthesize architectural overview and usage patterns\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture outline + Examples outline\")",
+        "output_to": "arch_examples_outline"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate architecture and examples documentation",
+        "description": "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md and EXAMPLES.md while preserving existing user modifications",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [arch_examples_outline] and [all_docs]",
+          "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md structure with system design and patterns",
+          "Generate EXAMPLES.md structure with code snippets and usage examples",
+          "Preserve [existing_arch_examples] user modifications"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Parse [arch_examples_outline] and [all_docs]",
+          "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md with system design",
+          "Generate EXAMPLES.md with code snippets",
+          "Preserve [existing_arch_examples] modifications"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "arch_examples_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/EXAMPLES.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 3: HTTP API Documentation Task (Optional)
+
+**Default Mode**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-006",
+  "title": "Generate HTTP API Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-004"],
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_generate": false
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "discover_api_endpoints",
+        "command": "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern='router\\.|@(Get|Post)', file_pattern='*.{ts,js}')",
+        "output_to": "endpoint_discovery"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_api_docs",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/api/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing API docs')",
+        "output_to": "existing_api_docs"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_api",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document HTTP API\\nTASK: Analyze API endpoints\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*} [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: API outline\")",
+        "output_to": "api_outline"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate HTTP API documentation",
+        "description": "Generate HTTP API documentation while preserving existing user modifications",
+        "modification_points": ["Parse [api_outline] and [endpoint_discovery]", "Generate HTTP API documentation", "Document endpoints and request/response formats", "Preserve [existing_api_docs] modifications"],
+        "logic_flow": ["Parse [api_outline] and [endpoint_discovery]", "Generate HTTP API documentation", "Preserve [existing_api_docs] modifications"],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "api_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/api/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Session Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/
+├── .active-WFS-docs-20240120-143022        # Active session marker
+└── WFS-docs-20240120-143022/
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md                         # Implementation plan
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md                         # Progress tracker
+    ├── .process/
+    │   ├── config.json                      # Single config (all settings + stats)
+    │   ├── folder-analysis.txt              # Folder classification results
+    │   ├── top-level-dirs.txt               # Top-level directory list
+    │   └── existing-docs.txt                # Existing documentation paths
+    └── .task/
+        ├── IMPL-001.json                    # Module tree task
+        ├── IMPL-002.json                    # Module tree task
+        ├── IMPL-003.json                    # Module tree task
+        ├── IMPL-004.json                    # Project README (full mode)
+        ├── IMPL-005.json                    # ARCHITECTURE.md + EXAMPLES.md (full mode)
+        └── IMPL-006.json                    # HTTP API docs (optional)
+```
+
+**Config File Structure** (config.json):
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-docs-20240120-143022",
+  "timestamp": "2024-01-20T14:30:22+08:00",
+  "path": ".",
+  "target_path": "/d/Claude_dms3",
+  "project_root": "/d/Claude_dms3",
+  "mode": "full",
+  "tool": "gemini",
+  "cli_generate": false,
+  "update_mode": "update",
+  "existing_docs": 5,
+  "analysis": {
+    "total": "15",
+    "code": "8",
+    "navigation": "7",
+    "top_level": "3"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Generated Documentation
+
+**Structure mirrors project source directories**:
+
+```
+.workflow/docs/
+├── src/                               # Mirrors src/ directory
+│   ├── modules/                       # Level 1 output
+│   │   ├── README.md                  # Navigation for src/modules/
+│   │   ├── auth/
+│   │   │   ├── API.md                 # Auth module API signatures
+│   │   │   ├── README.md              # Auth module documentation
+│   │   │   └── middleware/
+│   │   │       ├── API.md             # Middleware API
+│   │   │       └── README.md          # Middleware docs
+│   │   └── api/
+│   │       ├── API.md                 # API module signatures
+│   │       └── README.md              # API module docs
+│   └── utils/                         # Level 1 output
+│       └── README.md                  # Utils navigation
+├── lib/                               # Mirrors lib/ directory
+│   └── core/
+│       ├── API.md
+│       └── README.md
+├── README.md                          # Level 2 output (root only)
+├── ARCHITECTURE.md                    # Level 3 output (root only)
+├── EXAMPLES.md                        # Level 3 output (root only)
+└── api/                               # Level 3 output (optional)
+    └── README.md                      # HTTP API reference
+```
+
+## Execution Commands
+
+### Full Mode (--mode full)
+```bash
+# Level 1 - Module documentation (parallel)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-001
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002
+/workflow:execute IMPL-003
+
+# Level 2 - Project README (after Level 1)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-004
+
+# Level 3 - Architecture & Examples (after Level 2)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-005  # ARCHITECTURE.md + EXAMPLES.md
+/workflow:execute IMPL-006  # HTTP API (if present)
+```
+
+### Partial Mode (--mode partial)
+```bash
+# Only Level 1 tasks generated (module documentation)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-001
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002
+/workflow:execute IMPL-003
+```
+
+## Simple Bash Commands
+
+### Session Management
+```bash
+# Create session and initialize config (all in one)
+bash(
+  session="WFS-docs-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
+  mkdir -p ".workflow/${session}"/{.task,.process,.summaries}
+  touch ".workflow/.active-${session}"
+  cat > ".workflow/${session}/.process/config.json" <<EOF
+{"session_id":"${session}","timestamp":"$(date -Iseconds)","path":".","mode":"full","tool":"gemini","cli_generate":false}
+EOF
+  echo "Session: ${session}"
+)
+
+# Read session config
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+
+# Extract config values
+bash(jq -r '.tool' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+bash(jq -r '.mode' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.json)
+
+# List session tasks
+bash(ls .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.task/*.json)
+```
+
+### Analysis Commands
+```bash
+# Discover and classify folders (scans project source)
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh)
+
+# Count existing docs (in .workflow/docs/ directory)
+bash(if [[ -d ".workflow/docs" ]]; then find .workflow/docs -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l; else echo "0"; fi)
+
+# List existing documentation (in .workflow/docs/ directory)
+bash(if [[ -d ".workflow/docs" ]]; then find .workflow/docs -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null; fi)
+```
+
+## Template Reference
+
+**Available Templates**:
+- `api.txt`: Unified template for Code API (Part A) and HTTP API (Part B)
+- `module-readme.txt`: Module purpose, usage, dependencies
+- `folder-navigation.txt`: Navigation README for folders with subdirectories
+- `project-readme.txt`: Project overview, getting started, module navigation
+- `project-architecture.txt`: System structure, module map, design patterns
+- `project-examples.txt`: End-to-end usage examples
+
+**Template Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/`
+
+## CLI Generate Mode Summary
+
+| Mode | CLI Placement | CLI MODE | Agent Role |
+|------|---------------|----------|------------|
+| **Default** | pre_analysis | analysis | Generates documentation files |
+| **--cli-generate** | implementation_approach | write | Validates and coordinates CLI output |
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute documentation tasks
+- `/workflow:status` - View task progress
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Mark session complete

.claude/commands/memory/update-memory-full.md

@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+---
+name: update-full
+description: Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex] [--path <directory>]"
+---
+
+# Full Documentation Update (/memory:update-full)
+
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command orchestrates project-wide CLAUDE.md updates** using depth-parallel execution strategy with intelligent complexity detection.
+
+**Execution Model**:
+
+1. **Initial Analysis**: Cache git changes, discover module structure
+2. **Complexity Detection**: Analyze module count, determine strategy
+3. **Plan Presentation**: Show user exactly what will be updated
+4. **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Update modules by depth (highest to lowest)
+5. **Safety Verification**: Ensure only CLAUDE.md files modified
+
+**Tool Selection**:
+- `--tool gemini` (default): Documentation generation, pattern recognition
+- `--tool qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design docs
+- `--tool codex`: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
+**Path Parameter**:
+- `--path <directory>` (optional): Target specific directory for updates
+- If not specified: Updates entire project from current directory
+- If specified: Changes to target directory before discovery
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Analyze First**: Run git cache and module discovery before any updates
+2. **Scope Control**: Use --path to target specific directories, default is entire project
+3. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+4. **Depth-Parallel**: Same depth runs parallel (max 4 jobs), different depths sequential
+5. **Safety Check**: Verify only CLAUDE.md files modified, revert if source files touched
+6. **Independent Commands**: Each update is a separate bash() call
+7. **No Background Bash Tool**: Never use `run_in_background` parameter in bash() calls; use shell `&` for parallelism
+
+## Execution Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Analysis
+
+**Cache git changes:**
+```bash
+bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
+```
+
+**Get module structure:**
+
+*If no --path parameter:*
+```bash
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list)
+```
+
+*If --path parameter specified:*
+```bash
+bash(cd <target-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list)
+```
+
+**Example with path:**
+```bash
+# Update only .claude directory
+bash(cd .claude && ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list)
+
+# Update specific feature directory
+bash(cd src/features/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list)
+```
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract module paths from `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` format
+- Count total modules
+- Identify which modules have/need CLAUDE.md
+
+**Example output:**
+```
+depth:5|path:./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis|files:5|has_claude:no
+depth:4|path:./.claude/commands/cli/mode|files:3|has_claude:no
+depth:3|path:./.claude/commands/cli|files:6|has_claude:no
+depth:0|path:.|files:14|has_claude:yes
+```
+
+**Validation**:
+- If --path specified, directory exists and is accessible
+- Module list contains depth and path information
+- At least one module exists
+- All paths are relative to target directory (if --path used)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+- **Simple projects (≤20 modules)**: Present plan to user, wait for approval
+- **Complex projects (>20 modules)**: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
+
+**Plan format:**
+```
+📋 Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini
+  Total modules: 31
+
+  NEW CLAUDE.md files (30):
+    - ./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/CLAUDE.md
+    - ./.claude/commands/cli/mode/CLAUDE.md
+    - ... (28 more)
+
+  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (1):
+    - ./CLAUDE.md
+
+  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**User Confirmation Required**: No execution without explicit approval
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Depth-Parallel Execution
+
+**Pattern**: Process highest depth first, parallel within depth, sequential across depths.
+
+**Command structure:**
+```bash
+bash(cd <module-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "<tool>" &)
+```
+
+**Example - Depth 5 (8 modules):**
+```bash
+bash(cd ./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+```bash
+bash(cd ./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+```bash
+bash(cd ./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+```bash
+bash(cd ./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/implementation && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+*Wait for depth 5 completion...*
+
+**Example - Depth 4 (7 modules):**
+```bash
+bash(cd ./.claude/commands/cli/mode && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+```bash
+bash(cd ./.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+*Continue for remaining depths (3 → 2 → 1 → 0)...*
+
+**Execution Rules**:
+- Each command is separate bash() call
+- Up to 4 concurrent jobs per depth
+- Wait for all jobs in current depth before proceeding
+- Extract path from `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` format
+- All paths relative to target directory (current dir or --path value)
+
+**Path Context**:
+- Without --path: Paths relative to current directory
+- With --path: Paths relative to specified target directory
+- Module discovery runs in target directory context
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Safety Verification
+
+**Check modified files:**
+```bash
+bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified")
+```
+
+**Expected output:**
+```
+✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified
+```
+
+**If non-CLAUDE.md files detected:**
+```
+⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified
+Modified files: src/index.ts, package.json
+→ Run: git restore --staged .
+```
+
+**Display final status:**
+```bash
+bash(git status --short)
+```
+
+**Example output:**
+```
+A  .claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/CLAUDE.md
+A  .claude/commands/cli/mode/CLAUDE.md
+M  CLAUDE.md
+... (30 more files)
+```
+
+## Command Pattern Reference
+
+**Single module update:**
+```bash
+bash(cd <module-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "<tool>" &)
+```
+
+**Components**:
+- `cd <module-path>` - Navigate to module (from `path:` field)
+- `&&` - Ensure cd succeeds
+- `update_module_claude.sh` - Update script
+- `"."` - Current directory
+- `"full"` - Full update mode
+- `"<tool>"` - gemini/qwen/codex
+- `&` - Background execution
+
+**Path extraction:**
+```bash
+# From: depth:5|path:./src/auth|files:10|has_claude:no
+# Extract: ./src/auth
+# Command: bash(cd ./src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+## Complex Projects Strategy
+
+For projects >20 modules, delegate to memory-bridge agent:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+  description="Complex project full update",
+  prompt=`
+CONTEXT:
+- Total modules: ${module_count}
+- Tool: ${tool}
+- Mode: full
+
+MODULE LIST:
+${modules_output}
+
+REQUIREMENTS:
+1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level
+2. Process depths N→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel per depth
+3. Command: cd "<path>" && update_module_claude.sh "." "full" "${tool}" &
+4. Extract path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
+5. Verify all modules processed
+6. Run safety check
+7. Display git status
+`
+)
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Invalid path parameter**: Report error if --path directory doesn't exist, abort execution
+- **Module discovery failure**: Report error, abort execution
+- **User declines approval**: Abort execution, no changes made
+- **Safety check failure**: Automatic staging revert, report modified files
+- **Update script failure**: Report failed modules, continue with remaining
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+✅ Parse `--tool` parameter (default: gemini)
+✅ Parse `--path` parameter (optional, default: current directory)
+✅ Execute git cache in current directory
+✅ Execute module discovery (with cd if --path specified)
+✅ Parse module list, count total modules
+✅ Determine strategy based on module count (≤20 vs >20)
+✅ Present plan with exact file paths
+✅ **Wait for user confirmation** (simple projects only)
+✅ Organize modules by depth
+✅ For each depth (highest to lowest):
+  - Launch up to 5 parallel updates
+  - Wait for depth completion
+  - Proceed to next depth
+✅ Run safety check after all updates
+✅ Display git status
+✅ Report completion summary
+
+
+
+## Tool Parameter Reference
+
+**Gemini** (default):
+- Best for: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
+- Context window: Large, handles complex codebases
+- Output style: Comprehensive, detailed explanations
+
+**Qwen**:
+- Best for: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
+- Context window: Large, similar to Gemini
+- Output style: Structured, systematic analysis
+
+**Codex**:
+- Best for: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+- Capabilities: Mathematical reasoning, autonomous development
+- Output style: Technical, implementation-focused
+
+## Path Parameter Reference
+
+**Use Cases**:
+
+**Update configuration directory only:**
+```bash
+/memory:update-full --path .claude
+```
+- Updates only .claude directory and subdirectories
+- Useful after workflow or command modifications
+- Faster than full project update
+
+**Update specific feature module:**
+```bash
+/memory:update-full --path src/features/auth
+```
+- Updates authentication feature and sub-modules
+- Ideal for feature-specific documentation
+- Isolates scope for targeted updates
+
+**Update nested structure:**
+```bash
+/memory:update-full --path .claude/workflows/cli-templates
+```
+- Updates deeply nested directory tree
+- Maintains relative path structure in output
+- All module paths relative to specified directory
+
+**Best Practices**:
+- Use `--path` when working on specific features/modules
+- Omit `--path` for project-wide architectural changes
+- Combine with `--tool` for specialized documentation needs
+- Verify directory exists before execution (automatic validation)

.claude/commands/memory/update-memory-related.md

@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
+---
+name: update-related
+description: Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation updates based on recent changes
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
+---
+
+# Related Documentation Update (/memory:update-related)
+
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command orchestrates context-aware CLAUDE.md updates** for modules affected by recent changes using intelligent change detection.
+
+**Execution Model**:
+
+1. **Change Detection**: Analyze git changes to identify affected modules
+2. **Complexity Analysis**: Evaluate change count and determine strategy
+3. **Plan Presentation**: Show user which modules need updates
+4. **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Update affected modules by depth (highest to lowest)
+5. **Safety Verification**: Ensure only CLAUDE.md files modified
+
+**Tool Selection**:
+- `--tool gemini` (default): Documentation generation, pattern recognition
+- `--tool qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design docs
+- `--tool codex`: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Detect Changes First**: Use git diff to identify affected modules before updates
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Related Mode**: Update only changed modules and their parent contexts
+4. **Depth-Parallel**: Same depth runs parallel (max 4 jobs), different depths sequential
+5. **Safety Check**: Verify only CLAUDE.md files modified, revert if source files touched
+6. **No Background Bash Tool**: Never use `run_in_background` parameter in bash() calls; use shell `&` for parallelism
+
+## Execution Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Change Detection & Analysis
+
+**Refresh code index:**
+```bash
+bash(mcp__code-index__refresh_index)
+```
+
+**Detect changed modules:**
+```bash
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list)
+```
+
+**Cache git changes:**
+```bash
+bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
+```
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract changed module paths from `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` format
+- Count affected modules
+- Identify which modules have/need CLAUDE.md updates
+
+**Example output:**
+```
+depth:3|path:./src/api/auth|files:5|types:[ts]|has_claude:no|change:new
+depth:2|path:./src/api|files:12|types:[ts]|has_claude:yes|change:modified
+depth:1|path:./src|files:8|types:[ts]|has_claude:yes|change:parent
+depth:0|path:.|files:14|has_claude:yes|change:parent
+```
+
+**Fallback behavior**:
+- If no git changes detected, use recent modules (first 10 by depth)
+
+**Validation**:
+- Changed module list contains valid paths
+- At least one affected module exists
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+- **Simple changes (≤15 modules)**: Present plan to user, wait for approval
+- **Complex changes (>15 modules)**: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
+
+**Plan format:**
+```
+📋 Related Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini
+  Changed modules: 4
+
+  NEW CLAUDE.md files (1):
+    - ./src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md [new module]
+
+  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (3):
+    - ./src/api/CLAUDE.md [parent of changed auth/]
+    - ./src/CLAUDE.md [parent context]
+    - ./CLAUDE.md [root level]
+
+  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**User Confirmation Required**: No execution without explicit approval
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Depth-Parallel Execution
+
+**Pattern**: Process highest depth first, parallel within depth, sequential across depths.
+
+**Command structure:**
+```bash
+bash(cd <module-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "<tool>" &)
+```
+
+**Example - Depth 3 (new module):**
+```bash
+bash(cd ./src/api/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+*Wait for depth 3 completion...*
+
+**Example - Depth 2 (modified parent):**
+```bash
+bash(cd ./src/api && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+*Wait for depth 2 completion...*
+
+**Example - Depth 1 & 0 (parent contexts):**
+```bash
+bash(cd ./src && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "gemini" &)
+```
+```bash
+bash(cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+*Wait for all depths completion...*
+
+**Execution Rules**:
+- Each command is separate bash() call
+- Up to 4 concurrent jobs per depth
+- Wait for all jobs in current depth before proceeding
+- Use "related" mode (not "full") for context-aware updates
+- Extract path from `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` format
+
+**Related Mode Behavior**:
+- Updates module based on recent git changes
+- Includes parent context for better documentation coherence
+- More efficient than full updates for iterative development
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Safety Verification
+
+**Check modified files:**
+```bash
+bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified")
+```
+
+**Expected output:**
+```
+✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified
+```
+
+**If non-CLAUDE.md files detected:**
+```
+⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified
+Modified files: src/api/auth/index.ts, package.json
+→ Run: git restore --staged .
+```
+
+**Display final statistics:**
+```bash
+bash(git diff --stat)
+```
+
+**Example output:**
+```
+.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/CLAUDE.md | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++
+src/api/CLAUDE.md                                          | 23 +++++++++--
+src/CLAUDE.md                                              | 12 ++++--
+CLAUDE.md                                                  | 8 ++--
+4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+```
+
+## Command Pattern Reference
+
+**Single module update:**
+```bash
+bash(cd <module-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "<tool>" &)
+```
+
+**Components**:
+- `cd <module-path>` - Navigate to module (from `path:` field)
+- `&&` - Ensure cd succeeds
+- `update_module_claude.sh` - Update script
+- `"."` - Current directory
+- `"related"` - Related mode (context-aware, change-based)
+- `"<tool>"` - gemini/qwen/codex
+- `&` - Background execution
+
+**Path extraction:**
+```bash
+# From: depth:3|path:./src/api/auth|files:5|change:new|has_claude:no
+# Extract: ./src/api/auth
+# Command: bash(cd ./src/api/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "gemini" &)
+```
+
+**Mode comparison:**
+- `"full"` - Complete module documentation regeneration
+- `"related"` - Context-aware update based on recent changes (faster)
+
+## Complex Changes Strategy
+
+For changes affecting >15 modules, delegate to memory-bridge agent:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+  description="Complex project related update",
+  prompt=`
+CONTEXT:
+- Total modules: ${change_count}
+- Tool: ${tool}
+- Mode: related
+
+MODULE LIST:
+${changed_modules_output}
+
+REQUIREMENTS:
+1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level
+2. Process depths N→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel per depth
+3. Command: cd "<path>" && update_module_claude.sh "." "related" "${tool}" &
+4. Extract path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
+5. Verify all ${change_count} modules processed
+6. Run safety check
+7. Display git diff --stat
+`
+)
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **No changes detected**: Use fallback mode (recent 10 modules)
+- **Change detection failure**: Report error, abort execution
+- **User declines approval**: Abort execution, no changes made
+- **Safety check failure**: Automatic staging revert, report modified files
+- **Update script failure**: Report failed modules, continue with remaining
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+✅ Parse `--tool` parameter (default: gemini)
+✅ Refresh code index for accurate change detection
+✅ Detect changed modules via detect_changed_modules.sh
+✅ Cache git changes to protect current state
+✅ Parse changed module list, count affected modules
+✅ Apply fallback if no changes detected (recent 10 modules)
+✅ Determine strategy based on change count (≤15 vs >15)
+✅ Present plan with exact file paths and change types
+✅ **Wait for user confirmation** (simple changes only)
+✅ Organize modules by depth
+✅ For each depth (highest to lowest):
+  - Launch up to 4 parallel updates with "related" mode
+  - Wait for depth completion
+  - Proceed to next depth
+✅ Run safety check after all updates
+✅ Display git diff statistics
+✅ Report completion summary
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Daily development update (default: gemini)
+/memory:update-related
+
+# After feature work with specific tool
+/memory:update-related --tool qwen
+
+# Code quality review after implementation
+/memory:update-related --tool codex
+```
+
+## Tool Parameter Reference
+
+**Gemini** (default):
+- Best for: Documentation generation, pattern recognition
+- Use case: Daily development updates, feature documentation
+- Output style: Comprehensive, contextual explanations
+
+**Qwen**:
+- Best for: Architecture analysis, system design
+- Use case: Structural changes, API design updates
+- Output style: Structured, systematic documentation
+
+**Codex**:
+- Best for: Implementation validation, code quality
+- Use case: After implementation, refactoring work
+- Output style: Technical, implementation-focused
+
+## Comparison with Full Update
+
+| Aspect | Related Update | Full Update |
+|--------|----------------|-------------|
+| **Scope** | Changed modules only | All project modules |
+| **Speed** | Fast (minutes) | Slower (10-30 min) |
+| **Use case** | Daily development | Major refactoring |
+| **Mode** | `"related"` | `"full"` |
+| **Trigger** | After commits | After major changes |
+| **Complexity threshold** | ≤15 modules | ≤20 modules |

.claude/commands/task/breakdown.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: breakdown
 description: Intelligent task decomposition with context-aware subtask generation
-usage: /task:breakdown <task-id>
-argument-hint: task-id
-examples:
-  - /task:breakdown IMPL-1
-  - /task:breakdown IMPL-1.1
-  - /task:breakdown impl-3
+argument-hint: "task-id"
 ---
 
 # Task Breakdown Command (/task:breakdown)

.claude/commands/task/create.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: create
 description: Create implementation tasks with automatic context awareness
-usage: /task:create "title"
-argument-hint: "task title"
-examples:
-  - /task:create "Implement user authentication"
-  - /task:create "Build REST API endpoints"
-  - /task:create "Fix login validation bug"
+argument-hint: "\"task title\""
 ---
 
 # Task Create Command (/task:create)

.claude/commands/task/execute.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: execute
 description: Execute tasks with appropriate agents and context-aware orchestration
-usage: /task:execute <task-id>
-argument-hint: task-id
-examples:
-  - /task:execute IMPL-1
-  - /task:execute IMPL-1.2
-  - /task:execute IMPL-3
+argument-hint: "task-id"
 ---
 
 ### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/task:execute`**

.claude/commands/task/replan.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: replan
 description: Replan individual tasks with detailed user input and change tracking
-usage: /task:replan <task-id> [input]
-argument-hint: task-id ["text"|file.md|ISS-001]
-examples:
-  - /task:replan IMPL-1 "Add OAuth2 authentication support"
-  - /task:replan IMPL-1 updated-specs.md
-  - /task:replan IMPL-1 ISS-001
+argument-hint: "task-id [\"text\"|file.md]"
 ---
 
 # Task Replan Command (/task:replan)
@@ -38,12 +33,6 @@ Replans individual tasks with multiple input options, change tracking, and versi
 ```
 Supports: .md, .txt, .json, .yaml
 
-### Issue Reference
-```bash
-/task:replan IMPL-1 ISS-001
-```
-Loads issue description and requirements
-
 ### Interactive Mode
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 --interactive

.claude/commands/update-memory-full.md

@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update-memory-full
-description: Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-usage: /update-memory-full [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
-argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
-examples:
-  - /update-memory-full                      # Full project documentation update (gemini default)
-  - /update-memory-full --tool qwen          # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
-  - /update-memory-full --tool codex         # Use Codex for implementation validation
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-full`
-
-Complete project-wide documentation update using depth-parallel execution.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
-- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
-- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/bash
-# Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-
-# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-tool="gemini"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
-
-# Step 2: Code Index architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
-
-# Step 3: Cache git changes
-Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
-
-# Step 4: Get and display project structure
-modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
-count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 5: Analysis handover → Model takes control
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-
-# Pseudocode flow:
-# IF (module_count > 20 OR complex_project_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-# ELSE:
-#     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
-#
-# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to:
-
-1. **Analyze Complexity**: Review module count and project context
-2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**:
-   - Simple projects: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
-4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
-
-### 📋 Execution Strategies
-
-**For Simple Projects (≤20 modules):**
-
-Model will present detailed plan:
-```
-📋 Update Plan:
-  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
-
-  NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
-    - ./src/components/CLAUDE.md
-    - ./src/services/CLAUDE.md
-
-  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
-    - ./CLAUDE.md
-    - ./src/CLAUDE.md
-    - ./tests/CLAUDE.md
-
-  Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed
-
-  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
-```
-
-```pseudo
-# ⚠️ MANDATORY: User confirmation → MUST await explicit approval  
-IF user_explicitly_confirms():
-    continue_execution()
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-
-# Step 4: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
-
-# Step 5: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" "$tool" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-# Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
-non_claude=$(Bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || true))
-if [ -n "$non_claude" ]; then
-    Bash(git restore --staged .)
-    echo "⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified, staging reverted"
-    echo "Modified files: $non_claude"
-else
-    echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified, staging preserved"
-fi
-
-# Step 7: Display changes → Final status
-Bash(git status --short)
-```
-
-**For Complex Projects (>20 modules):**
-
-The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
-
-```javascript
-Task "Complex project full update"
-subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-prompt: `
-CONTEXT:
-- Total modules: ${module_count}
-- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
-- Mode: full
-- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
-- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
-
-MODULE LIST:
-${modules_output}  // Full output from get_modules_by_depth.sh list
-
-REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
-2. Process depths 5→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel jobs per depth
-3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "full" "${tool}" &
-4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
-5. Verify all ${module_count} modules are processed
-6. Run safety check after completion
-7. Display git status
-
-Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules.
-`
-```
-
-**Agent receives complete context:**
-- Module count and tool selection
-- Full structured module list
-- Clear execution requirements
-- Path extraction format
-- Success criteria
-
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Complete project documentation refresh
-/update-memory-full
-
-# After major architectural changes
-/update-memory-full
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Separated Commands**: Each bash operation is a discrete, trackable step
-- **Intelligent Complexity Detection**: Model analyzes project context for optimal strategy
-- **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Same depth modules run in parallel, depths run sequentially
-- **Git Integration**: Auto-cache changes before, safety check and show status after
-- **Safety Protection**: Automatic detection and revert of unintended source code modifications
-- **Module Detection**: Uses get_modules_by_depth.sh for structure discovery
-- **User Confirmation**: Clear plan presentation with approval step
-- **CLAUDE.md Only**: Only updates documentation, never source code

.claude/commands/update-memory-related.md

@@ -1,187 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update-memory-related
-description: Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation updates based on recent changes
-usage: /update-memory-related [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
-argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
-examples:
-  - /update-memory-related                    # Update documentation based on recent changes (gemini default)
-  - /update-memory-related --tool qwen        # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
-  - /update-memory-related --tool codex       # Use Codex for implementation validation
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-related`
-
-Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
-- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
-- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
-
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/bash
-# Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation update
-
-# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-tool="gemini"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
-
-# Step 2: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-
-# Step 3: Detect changed modules (before staging)
-changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list))
-
-# Step 4: Cache git changes (protect current state)
-Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
-
-# Step 5: Use detected changes or fallback
-if [ -z "$changed" ]; then
-    changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | head -10))
-fi
-count=$(echo "$changed" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 6: Analysis handover → Model takes control
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-
-# Pseudocode flow:
-# IF (change_count > 15 OR complex_changes_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-# ELSE:
-#     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
-#
-# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
-
-1. **Analyze Changes**: Review change count and complexity  
-2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which changed modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**: 
-   - Simple changes: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
-4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated for changed modules
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
-
-### 📋 Execution Strategies
-
-**For Simple Changes (≤15 modules):**
-
-Model will present detailed plan for affected modules:
-```
-📋 Related Update Plan:
-  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
-
-  CHANGED modules affecting CLAUDE.md:
-
-  NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
-    - ./src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-    - ./src/utils/helpers/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-
-  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
-    - ./src/api/CLAUDE.md  [parent of changed auth/]
-    - ./src/CLAUDE.md  [root level]
-
-  Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed for recent changes
-
-  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
-```
-
-```pseudo
-# ⚠️ MANDATORY: User confirmation → MUST await explicit approval
-IF user_explicitly_confirms():
-    continue_execution()
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-
-# Step 4: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(changed_modules)
-
-# Step 5: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" "$tool" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-# Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
-non_claude=$(Bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || true))
-if [ -n "$non_claude" ]; then
-    Bash(git restore --staged .)
-    echo "⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified, staging reverted"
-    echo "Modified files: $non_claude"
-else
-    echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified, staging preserved"
-fi
-
-# Step 7: Display changes → Final status
-Bash(git diff --stat)
-```
-
-**For Complex Changes (>15 modules):**
-
-The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
-
-```javascript
-Task "Complex project related update"
-subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-prompt: `
-CONTEXT:
-- Total modules: ${change_count}
-- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
-- Mode: related
-- Changed modules detected via: detect_changed_modules.sh
-- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
-- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
-
-MODULE LIST:
-${changed_modules_output}  // Full output from detect_changed_modules.sh list
-
-REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
-2. Process depths sequentially (deepest→shallowest), max 4 parallel jobs per depth
-3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "related" "${tool}" &
-4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
-5. Verify all ${change_count} modules are processed
-6. Run safety check after completion
-7. Display git diff --stat
-
-Execute depth-parallel updates for changed modules only.
-`
-```
-
-**Agent receives complete context:**
-- Changed module count and tool selection
-- Full structured module list (changed only)
-- Clear execution requirements with "related" mode
-- Path extraction format
-- Success criteria
-
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Daily development update
-/update-memory-related
-
-# After feature work
-/update-memory-related
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Separated Commands**: Each bash operation is a discrete, trackable step
-- **Intelligent Change Analysis**: Model analyzes change complexity for optimal strategy
-- **Change Detection**: Automatically finds affected modules using git diff
-- **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Same depth modules run in parallel, depths run sequentially  
-- **Git Integration**: Auto-cache changes, show diff statistics after
-- **Fallback Mode**: Updates recent files when no git changes found
-- **User Confirmation**: Clear plan presentation with approval step
-- **CLAUDE.md Only**: Only updates documentation, never source code

.claude/commands/version.md

@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: version
 description: Display version information and check for updates
-usage: /version
-examples:
-  - /version
 allowed-tools: Bash(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/action-plan-verify.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: action-plan-verify
 description: Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis of IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json before execution
-usage: /workflow:action-plan-verify [--session <session-id>]
-argument-hint: "optional: --session <session-id>"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:action-plan-verify
-  - /workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-auth
+argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
 allowed-tools: Read(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/api-designer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,585 @@
+---
+name: api-designer
+description: Generate or update api-designer/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🔌 **API Designer Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating api-designer/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from backend API design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **API Design Focus**: RESTful/GraphQL API design, endpoint structure, and contract definition
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **API Architecture**: RESTful/GraphQL design patterns and best practices
+- **Endpoint Design**: Resource modeling, URL structure, and HTTP method selection
+- **Data Contracts**: Request/response schemas, validation rules, and data transformation
+- **API Documentation**: OpenAPI/Swagger specifications and developer experience
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (API Contract Within Architectural Framework)**
+- **API Contract Definition**: Specific endpoint paths, HTTP methods, and status codes
+- **Resource Modeling**: Mapping domain entities to RESTful resources or GraphQL types
+- **Request/Response Schemas**: Detailed data contracts, validation rules, and error formats
+- **API Versioning Strategy**: Version management, deprecation policies, and migration paths
+- **Developer Experience**: API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger), code examples, and SDKs
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **System Architecture Decisions**: Microservices vs monolithic, overall communication patterns → Defers to **System Architect**
+- **Canonical Data Model**: Underlying data schemas and entity relationships → Defers to **Data Architect**
+- **UI/Frontend Integration**: How clients consume the API → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **FROM System Architect**: Receives architectural constraints (REST vs GraphQL, sync vs async) that define the design space
+- **FROM Data Architect**: Receives canonical data model and translates it into public API data contracts (as projection/view)
+- **TO Frontend Teams**: Provides complete API specifications, documentation, and integration guides
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Check existing analysis
+CHECK: brainstorm_dir/api-designer/analysis.md
+IF EXISTS:
+    SHOW existing analysis summary
+    ASK: "Analysis exists. Do you want to:"
+    OPTIONS:
+      1. "Update with new insights" → Update existing
+      2. "Replace completely" → Generate new
+      3. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+ELSE:
+    CREATE new analysis
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Task Generation
+**Framework-Based Analysis** (when topic-framework.md exists):
+```bash
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Generate API designer analysis addressing topic framework
+
+     ## Framework Integration Required
+     **MANDATORY**: Load and address topic-framework.md discussion points
+     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+     **Output Location**: {session.brainstorm_dir}/api-designer/analysis.md
+
+     ## Analysis Requirements
+     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read topic-framework.md completely
+     2. **Address Each Discussion Point**: Respond to all 5 framework sections from API design perspective
+     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../topic-framework.md
+     4. **API Design Focus**: Emphasize endpoint structure, data contracts, versioning strategies
+     5. **Structured Response**: Use framework structure for analysis organization
+
+     ## Framework Sections to Address
+     - Core Requirements (from API design perspective)
+     - Technical Considerations (detailed API architecture analysis)
+     - User Experience Factors (developer experience and API usability)
+     - Implementation Challenges (API design risks and solutions)
+     - Success Metrics (API performance metrics and adoption tracking)
+
+     ## Output Structure Required
+     ```markdown
+     # API Designer Analysis: [Topic]
+
+     **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md
+     **Role Focus**: Backend API Design and Contract Definition
+
+     ## Core Requirements Analysis
+     [Address framework requirements from API design perspective]
+
+     ## Technical Considerations
+     [Detailed API architecture and endpoint design analysis]
+
+     ## Developer Experience Factors
+     [API usability, documentation, and integration ease]
+
+     ## Implementation Challenges
+     [API design risks and mitigation strategies]
+
+     ## Success Metrics
+     [API performance metrics, adoption rates, and developer satisfaction]
+
+     ## API Design-Specific Recommendations
+     [Detailed API design recommendations and best practices]
+     ```",
+     description="Generate API designer framework-based analysis")
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update Mechanism
+**Analysis Update Process**:
+```bash
+# For existing analysis updates
+IF update_mode = "incremental":
+    Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         prompt="Update existing API designer analysis
+
+         ## Current Analysis Context
+         **Existing Analysis**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/api-designer/analysis.md
+         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+
+         ## Update Requirements
+         1. **Preserve Structure**: Maintain existing analysis structure
+         2. **Add New Insights**: Integrate new API design insights and recommendations
+         3. **Framework Alignment**: Ensure continued alignment with topic framework
+         4. **API Updates**: Add new endpoint patterns, versioning strategies, documentation improvements
+         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../topic-framework.md reference
+
+         ## Update Instructions
+         - Read existing analysis completely
+         - Identify areas for enhancement or new insights
+         - Add API design depth while preserving original structure
+         - Update recommendations with new API design patterns and approaches
+         - Maintain framework discussion point addressing",
+         description="Update API designer analysis incrementally")
+```
+
+## Document Structure
+
+### Output Files
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
+├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
+└── api-designer/
+    └── analysis.md            # ★ OUTPUT: Framework-based analysis
+```
+
+### Analysis Structure
+**Required Elements**:
+- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md (if framework exists)
+- **Role Focus**: Backend API Design and Contract Definition perspective
+- **5 Framework Sections**: Address each framework discussion point
+- **API Design Recommendations**: Endpoint-specific insights and solutions
+
+## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
+
+### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
+Session detection and selection:
+```bash
+# Check for active sessions
+active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
+if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
+  prompt_user_to_select_session()
+else
+  use_existing_or_create_new()
+fi
+```
+
+### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
+**API Designer Perspective Questioning**
+
+Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive API design context:
+
+#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
+1. **API Type & Architecture**
+   - RESTful, GraphQL, or hybrid API approach?
+   - Synchronous vs asynchronous communication patterns?
+   - Real-time requirements (WebSocket, Server-Sent Events)?
+
+2. **Resource Modeling & Endpoints**
+   - What are the core domain resources/entities?
+   - Expected CRUD operations for each resource?
+   - Complex query requirements (filtering, sorting, pagination)?
+
+3. **Data Contracts & Validation**
+   - Request/response data format requirements (JSON, XML, Protocol Buffers)?
+   - Input validation and sanitization requirements?
+   - Data transformation and mapping needs?
+
+4. **API Management & Governance**
+   - API versioning strategy requirements?
+   - Authentication and authorization mechanisms?
+   - Rate limiting and throttling requirements?
+   - API documentation and developer portal needs?
+
+5. **Integration & Compatibility**
+   - Client platforms consuming the API (web, mobile, third-party)?
+   - Backward compatibility requirements?
+   - External API integrations needed?
+
+#### Context Validation
+- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
+- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
+- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/api-designer-context.md`
+
+### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
+**Dedicated Agent Execution**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute dedicated api-designer conceptual analysis for: {topic}
+
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: api-designer
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/api-designer/
+USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
+
+Flow Control Steps:
+[
+  {
+    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
+    \"action\": \"Load api-designer planning template\",
+    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/api-designer.md))\",
+    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
+  }
+]
+
+Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
+- Apply api-designer perspective to topic analysis
+- Focus on endpoint design, data contracts, and API governance
+- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
+- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
+- Address all user context from questioning phase
+
+Deliverables:
+- analysis.md: Main API design analysis
+- api-specification.md: Detailed endpoint specifications
+- data-contracts.md: Request/response schemas and validation rules
+- api-documentation.md: API documentation strategy and templates
+
+Embody api-designer role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
+```
+
+### Progress Tracking
+TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Gather API designer context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
+  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to api-designer-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
+  {"content": "Load api-designer planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
+  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for api-designer role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
+]
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Specification**
+
+### Output Location
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/api-designer/
+├── analysis.md                 # Primary API design analysis
+├── api-specification.md        # Detailed endpoint specifications (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+├── data-contracts.md           # Request/response schemas and validation rules
+├── versioning-strategy.md      # API versioning and backward compatibility plan
+└── developer-guide.md          # API usage documentation and integration examples
+```
+
+### Document Templates
+
+#### analysis.md Structure
+```markdown
+# API Design Analysis: {Topic}
+*Generated: {timestamp}*
+
+## Executive Summary
+[Key API design findings and recommendations overview]
+
+## API Architecture Overview
+### API Type Selection (REST/GraphQL/Hybrid)
+### Communication Patterns
+### Authentication & Authorization Strategy
+
+## Resource Modeling
+### Core Domain Resources
+### Resource Relationships
+### URL Structure and Naming Conventions
+
+## Endpoint Design
+### Resource Endpoints
+- GET /api/v1/resources
+- POST /api/v1/resources
+- GET /api/v1/resources/{id}
+- PUT /api/v1/resources/{id}
+- DELETE /api/v1/resources/{id}
+
+### Query Parameters
+- Filtering: ?filter[field]=value
+- Sorting: ?sort=field,-field2
+- Pagination: ?page=1&limit=20
+
+### HTTP Methods and Status Codes
+- Success responses (2xx)
+- Client errors (4xx)
+- Server errors (5xx)
+
+## Data Contracts
+### Request Schemas
+[JSON Schema or OpenAPI definitions]
+
+### Response Schemas
+[JSON Schema or OpenAPI definitions]
+
+### Validation Rules
+- Required fields
+- Data types and formats
+- Business logic constraints
+
+## API Versioning Strategy
+### Versioning Approach (URL/Header/Accept)
+### Version Lifecycle Management
+### Deprecation Policy
+### Migration Paths
+
+## Security & Governance
+### Authentication Mechanisms
+- OAuth 2.0 / JWT / API Keys
+### Authorization Patterns
+- RBAC / ABAC / Resource-based
+### Rate Limiting & Throttling
+### CORS and Security Headers
+
+## Error Handling
+### Standard Error Response Format
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "ERROR_CODE",
+    "message": "Human-readable error message",
+    "details": [],
+    "trace_id": "uuid"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Error Code Taxonomy
+### Validation Error Responses
+
+## API Documentation
+### OpenAPI/Swagger Specification
+### Developer Portal Requirements
+### Code Examples and SDKs
+### Changelog and Migration Guides
+
+## Performance Optimization
+### Response Caching Strategies
+### Compression (gzip, brotli)
+### Field Selection (sparse fieldsets)
+### Bulk Operations and Batch Endpoints
+
+## Monitoring & Observability
+### API Metrics
+- Request count, latency, error rates
+- Endpoint usage analytics
+### Logging Strategy
+### Distributed Tracing
+
+## Developer Experience
+### API Usability Assessment
+### Integration Complexity
+### SDK and Client Library Needs
+### Sandbox and Testing Environments
+```
+
+#### api-specification.md Structure
+```markdown
+# API Specification: {Topic}
+*OpenAPI 3.0 Specification*
+
+## API Information
+- **Title**: {API Name}
+- **Version**: 1.0.0
+- **Base URL**: https://api.example.com/v1
+- **Contact**: api-team@example.com
+
+## Endpoints
+
+### Users API
+
+#### GET /users
+**Description**: Retrieve a list of users
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `page` (query, integer): Page number (default: 1)
+- `limit` (query, integer): Items per page (default: 20, max: 100)
+- `sort` (query, string): Sort field (e.g., "created_at", "-updated_at")
+- `filter[status]` (query, string): Filter by user status
+
+**Response 200**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": [
+    {
+      "id": "uuid",
+      "username": "string",
+      "email": "string",
+      "created_at": "2025-10-15T00:00:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "meta": {
+    "page": 1,
+    "limit": 20,
+    "total": 100
+  },
+  "links": {
+    "self": "/users?page=1",
+    "next": "/users?page=2",
+    "prev": null
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### POST /users
+**Description**: Create a new user
+
+**Request Body**:
+```json
+{
+  "username": "string (required, 3-50 chars)",
+  "email": "string (required, valid email)",
+  "password": "string (required, min 8 chars)",
+  "profile": {
+    "first_name": "string (optional)",
+    "last_name": "string (optional)"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Response 201**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": {
+    "id": "uuid",
+    "username": "string",
+    "email": "string",
+    "created_at": "2025-10-15T00:00:00Z"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Response 400** (Validation Error):
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
+    "message": "Request validation failed",
+    "details": [
+      {
+        "field": "email",
+        "message": "Invalid email format"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+[Continue for all endpoints...]
+
+## Authentication
+
+### OAuth 2.0 Flow
+1. Client requests authorization
+2. User grants permission
+3. Client receives access token
+4. Client uses token in requests
+
+**Header Format**:
+```
+Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
+```
+
+## Rate Limiting
+
+**Headers**:
+- `X-RateLimit-Limit`: 1000
+- `X-RateLimit-Remaining`: 999
+- `X-RateLimit-Reset`: 1634270400
+
+**Response 429** (Too Many Requests):
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED",
+    "message": "API rate limit exceeded",
+    "retry_after": 3600
+  }
+}
+```
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Status Synchronization
+Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "BRAINSTORM": {
+      "api_designer": {
+        "status": "completed",
+        "completed_at": "timestamp",
+        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/api-designer/",
+        "key_insights": ["endpoint_design", "versioning_strategy", "data_contracts"]
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Cross-Role Collaboration
+API designer perspective provides:
+- **API Contract Specifications** → Frontend Developer
+- **Data Schema Requirements** → Data Architect
+- **Security Requirements** → Security Expert
+- **Integration Endpoints** → System Architect
+- **Performance Constraints** → DevOps Engineer
+
+## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
+
+### Required Analysis Elements
+- [ ] Complete endpoint inventory with HTTP methods and paths
+- [ ] Detailed request/response schemas with validation rules
+- [ ] Clear versioning strategy and backward compatibility plan
+- [ ] Comprehensive error handling and status code usage
+- [ ] API documentation strategy (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+
+### API Design Principles
+- [ ] **Consistency**: Uniform naming conventions and patterns across all endpoints
+- [ ] **Simplicity**: Intuitive resource modeling and URL structures
+- [ ] **Flexibility**: Support for filtering, sorting, pagination, and field selection
+- [ ] **Security**: Proper authentication, authorization, and input validation
+- [ ] **Performance**: Caching strategies, compression, and efficient data structures
+
+### Developer Experience Validation
+- [ ] API is self-documenting with clear endpoint descriptions
+- [ ] Error messages are actionable and helpful for debugging
+- [ ] Response formats are consistent and predictable
+- [ ] Code examples and integration guides are provided
+- [ ] Sandbox environment available for testing
+
+### Technical Completeness
+- [ ] **Resource Modeling**: All domain entities mapped to API resources
+- [ ] **CRUD Coverage**: Complete create, read, update, delete operations
+- [ ] **Query Capabilities**: Advanced filtering, sorting, and search functionality
+- [ ] **Versioning**: Clear version management and migration paths
+- [ ] **Monitoring**: API metrics, logging, and tracing strategies defined
+
+### Integration Readiness
+- [ ] **Client Compatibility**: API works with all target client platforms
+- [ ] **External Integration**: Third-party API dependencies identified
+- [ ] **Backward Compatibility**: Changes don't break existing clients
+- [ ] **Migration Path**: Clear upgrade paths for API consumers
+- [ ] **SDK Support**: Client libraries and code generation considered

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/artifacts.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: artifacts
 description: Generate role-specific topic-framework.md dynamically based on selected roles
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>" [--roles "role1,role2,role3"]
 argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for framework generation"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize database performance" --roles "system-architect,data-architect,subject-matter-expert"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Implement secure authentication system" --roles "ui-designer,ux-expert,subject-matter-expert"
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
@@ -368,4 +363,4 @@ ELSE:
 ### Integration Points
 - **Compatible with**: Other brainstorming commands in the same session
 - **Builds foundation for**: More detailed planning and implementation phases
-- **Outputs used by**: `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` command for cross-analysis integration
+- **Outputs used by**: `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` command for cross-analysis integration

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-parallel.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: auto-parallel
 description: Parallel brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and concurrent execution
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>"
 argument-hint: "topic or challenge description"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Implement secure authentication system"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
@@ -19,6 +14,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*
 
 ## Role Selection Logic
 - **Technical & Architecture**: `architecture|system|performance|database|security` → system-architect, data-architect, security-expert, subject-matter-expert
+- **API & Backend**: `api|endpoint|rest|graphql|backend|interface|contract|service` → api-designer, system-architect, data-architect
 - **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, user-researcher, product-manager, ux-expert, product-owner
 - **Business & Process**: `business|process|workflow|cost|innovation|testing` → business-analyst, innovation-lead, test-strategist
 - **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
@@ -28,7 +24,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*
 
 **Template Loading**: `bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role-name>.md"))`
 **Template Source**: `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
-**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
+**Available Roles**: api-designer, data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
 
 **Example**:
 ```bash
@@ -75,6 +71,7 @@ Auto command coordinates independent specialized commands:
 
 **Role Selection Logic**:
 - **Technical**: `architecture|system|performance|database` → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
+- **API & Backend**: `api|endpoint|rest|graphql|backend|interface|contract|service` → api-designer, system-architect, data-architect
 - **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
 - **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
 - **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
@@ -327,4 +324,4 @@ Command coordination model: artifacts command → parallel role analysis → syn
 - **Agent self-management**: Agents handle their own workflow and validation
 - **Concurrent operation**: No inter-agent dependencies enabling parallel execution
 - **Reference-based synthesis**: Post-processing integration without content duplication
-- **TodoWrite orchestration**: Progress tracking and workflow control throughout entire process
+- **TodoWrite orchestration**: Progress tracking and workflow control throughout entire process

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-squeeze.md

@@ -1,258 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto-squeeze
-description: Orchestrate 3-phase brainstorming workflow by executing commands sequentially
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "<topic>"
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for coordinated brainstorming"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Implement secure authentication system"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Brainstorm Auto-Squeeze Command
-
-## Coordinator Role
-
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute brainstorming commands in sequence (artifacts → roles → synthesis), auto-select relevant roles, and ensure complete brainstorming workflow execution.
-
-**Execution Flow**:
-1. Initialize TodoWrite → Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) → Validate framework → Update TodoWrite
-2. Select 2-3 relevant roles → Display selection → Execute Phase 2 (role analyses) → Update TodoWrite
-3. Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) → Validate outputs → Return summary
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
-2. **Auto-Select Roles**: Analyze topic keywords to select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
-3. **Display Selection**: Show selected roles to user before execution
-4. **Sequential Execution**: Execute role commands one by one, not in parallel
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until synthesis completes
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every command completion
-
-## 3-Phase Execution
-
-### Phase 1: Framework Generation
-
-**Step 1.1: Role Selection**
-Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic below)
-
-**Step 1.2: Generate Role-Specific Framework**
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"[topic]\" --roles \"[role1,role2,role3]\"")`
-
-**Input**: Selected roles from step 1.1
-
-**Parse Output**:
-- Verify topic-framework.md created with role-specific sections
-
-**Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md` exists
-- Contains sections for each selected role
-- Includes cross-role integration points
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, mark "Display selected roles" as in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution
-
-**Step 2.1: Role Selection**
-Use keyword analysis to auto-select 2-3 roles:
-
-**Role Selection Logic**:
-- **Technical/Architecture keywords**: `architecture|system|performance|database|api|backend|scalability`
-  → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **UI/UX keywords**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|frontend|experience`
-  → ui-designer, ux-expert
-- **Product/Business keywords**: `product|feature|business|workflow|process|customer`
-  → product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile/Delivery keywords**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery`
-  → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise keywords**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation`
-  → subject-matter-expert
-- **Default**: product-manager (if no clear match)
-
-**Selection Rules**:
-- Maximum 3 roles
-- Select most relevant role first based on strongest keyword match
-- Include complementary perspectives (e.g., if system-architect selected, also consider security-expert)
-
-**Step 2.2: Display Selected Roles**
-Show selection to user before execution:
-```
-Selected roles for analysis:
-- ui-designer (UI/UX perspective)
-- system-architect (Technical architecture)
-- security-expert (Security considerations)
-```
-
-**Step 2.3: Execute Role Commands Sequentially**
-Execute each selected role command one by one:
-
-**Commands**:
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:system-architect")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:data-architect")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-manager")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-owner")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:test-strategist")`
-
-**Validation** (after each role):
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md` exists
-- Contains role-specific analysis
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark each role task completed after execution, start next role as in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis")`
-
-**Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md` exists
-- Contains cross-references to role analyses using @ notation
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
-
-**Return to User**:
-```
-Brainstorming complete for topic: [topic]
-Framework: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md
-Roles analyzed: [role1], [role2], [role3]
-Synthesis: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md
-```
-
-## TodoWrite Pattern
-
-```javascript
-// Initialize (before Phase 1)
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// After displaying roles
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// Continue pattern for each role and synthesis...
-```
-
-## Data Flow
-
-```
-User Input (topic)
-    ↓
-Role Selection (analyze topic keywords)
-    ↓ Output: 2-3 selected roles (e.g., ui-designer, system-architect, security-expert)
-    ↓
-Phase 1: artifacts "topic" --roles "role1,role2,role3"
-    ↓ Input: topic + selected roles
-    ↓ Output: role-specific topic-framework.md
-    ↓
-Display: Show selected roles to user
-    ↓
-Phase 2: Execute each role command sequentially
-    ↓ Role 1 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓ Role 2 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓ Role 3 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓
-Phase 3: synthesis
-    ↓ Input: role-specific framework + all role analyses
-    ↓ Output: synthesis-report.md with role-targeted insights
-    ↓
-Return summary to user
-```
-
-**Session Context**: All commands use active brainstorming session, sharing:
-- Role-specific topic framework
-- Role-targeted analyses
-- Cross-role integration points
-- Synthesis with role-specific insights
-
-**Key Improvement**: Framework is generated with roles parameter, ensuring all discussion points are relevant to selected roles
-
-## Role Selection Examples
-
-### Example 1: UI-Focused Topic
-**Topic**: "Redesign user authentication interface"
-**Keywords detected**: user, interface, design
-**Selected roles**:
-- ui-designer (primary: UI/UX match)
-- ux-expert (secondary: user experience)
-- subject-matter-expert (complementary: auth standards)
-
-### Example 2: Architecture Topic
-**Topic**: "Design scalable microservices architecture"
-**Keywords detected**: architecture, scalable, system
-**Selected roles**:
-- system-architect (primary: architecture match)
-- data-architect (secondary: scalability/data)
-- subject-matter-expert (complementary: domain expertise)
-
-### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
-**Topic**: "Optimize team sprint planning and delivery process"
-**Keywords detected**: sprint, team, delivery, process
-**Selected roles**:
-- scrum-master (primary: agile process match)
-- product-owner (secondary: backlog/delivery focus)
-- product-manager (complementary: product strategy)
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Framework Generation Failure**: Stop workflow, report error, do not proceed to role selection
-- **Role Analysis Failure**: Log failure, continue with remaining roles, note in final summary
-- **Synthesis Failure**: Retry once, if still fails report partial completion with available analyses
-- **Session Error**: Report session issue, prompt user to check session status
-
-## Output Structure
-
-```
-.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Phase 1 output
-├── [role1]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 1)
-├── [role2]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 2)
-├── [role3]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 3)
-└── synthesis-report.md        # Phase 3 output
-```
-
-## Coordinator Checklist
-
-✅ Initialize TodoWrite with framework + display + N roles + synthesis tasks
-✅ Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) immediately
-✅ Validate topic-framework.md exists
-✅ Analyze topic keywords for role selection
-✅ Auto-select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
-✅ Display selected roles to user with rationale
-✅ Execute each role command sequentially
-✅ Validate each role's analysis.md after execution
-✅ Update TodoWrite after each role completion
-✅ Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) after all roles complete
-✅ Validate synthesis-report.md exists
-✅ Return summary with all generated files

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/data-architect.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: data-architect
 description: Generate or update data-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "user analytics data pipeline"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "real-time data processing system"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
@@ -27,6 +22,26 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Data Quality Management**: Data accuracy, completeness, and consistency
 - **Analytics and Insights**: Data analysis and business intelligence solutions
 
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Canonical Data Model - Source of Truth)**
+- **Canonical Data Model**: The authoritative, system-wide data schema representing domain entities and relationships
+- **Entity-Relationship Design**: Defining entities, attributes, relationships, and constraints
+- **Data Normalization & Optimization**: Ensuring data integrity, reducing redundancy, and optimizing storage
+- **Database Schema Design**: Physical database structures, indexes, partitioning strategies
+- **Data Pipeline Architecture**: ETL/ELT processes, data warehousing, and analytics pipelines
+- **Data Governance**: Data quality standards, retention policies, and compliance requirements
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **API Data Contracts**: Public-facing request/response schemas exposed by APIs → Defers to **API Designer**
+- **System Integration Patterns**: How services communicate at the macro level → Defers to **System Architect**
+- **UI Data Presentation**: How data is displayed to users → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO API Designer**: Provides canonical data model that API Designer translates into public API data contracts (as projection/view)
+- **TO System Architect**: Provides data flow requirements and storage constraints to inform system design
+- **FROM System Architect**: Receives system-level integration requirements and scalability constraints
+
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
@@ -202,4 +217,4 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Integration Points
 - **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Data architecture insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
-- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-manager.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: product-manager
 description: Generate or update product-manager/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-owner.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: product-owner
 description: Generate or update product-owner/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/scrum-master.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: scrum-master
 description: Generate or update scrum-master/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/subject-matter-expert.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: subject-matter-expert
 description: Generate or update subject-matter-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md

@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: synthesis
 description: Generate synthesis-specification.md from topic-framework and role analyses with @ references
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
 argument-hint: "no arguments required - synthesizes existing framework and role analyses"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
@@ -497,4 +494,4 @@ If you want to skip verification and proceed directly:
 /workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
 ```
 
-⚠️ **Warning**: Skipping verification increases risk of late-stage issues and rework.
+⚠️ **Warning**: Skipping verification increases risk of late-stage issues and rework.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/system-architect.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: system-architect
 description: Generate or update system-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect "user authentication redesign"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
@@ -26,6 +22,25 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Performance & Scalability**: Capacity planning and optimization strategies
 - **Integration Patterns**: System communication and data flow design
 
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Macro-Architecture)**
+- **System-Level Architecture**: Service boundaries, deployment topology, and system composition
+- **Cross-Service Communication Patterns**: Choosing between microservices/monolithic, event-driven/request-response, sync/async patterns
+- **Technology Stack Decisions**: Language, framework, database, and infrastructure choices
+- **Non-Functional Requirements**: Scalability, performance, availability, disaster recovery, and monitoring strategies
+- **Integration Planning**: How systems and services connect at the macro level (not specific API contracts)
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **API Contract Details**: Specific endpoint definitions, URL structures, HTTP methods → Defers to **API Designer**
+- **Data Schemas**: Detailed data model design and entity relationships → Defers to **Data Architect**
+- **UI/UX Design**: Interface design and user experience → Defers to **UX Expert** and **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO API Designer**: Provides architectural constraints (REST vs GraphQL, sync vs async) that define the API design space
+- **TO Data Architect**: Provides system-level data flow requirements and integration patterns
+- **FROM Data Architect**: Receives canonical data model to inform system integration design
+
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
@@ -369,4 +384,4 @@ System architect perspective provides:
 - [ ] **Resource Planning**: Resource requirements clearly defined and realistic
 - [ ] **Risk Management**: Technical risks identified with mitigation plans
 - [ ] **Performance Validation**: Architecture can meet performance requirements
-- [ ] **Evolution Strategy**: Design allows for future growth and changes
+- [ ] **Evolution Strategy**: Design allows for future growth and changes

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ui-designer.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: ui-designer
 description: Generate or update ui-designer/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "mobile app navigation improvement"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
@@ -22,10 +17,31 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
 ### Analysis Scope
-- **User Experience Design**: Intuitive and efficient user experiences
-- **Interface Design**: Beautiful and functional user interfaces
-- **Interaction Design**: Smooth user interaction flows and micro-interactions
-- **Accessibility Design**: Inclusive design meeting WCAG compliance
+- **Visual Design**: Color palettes, typography, spacing, and visual hierarchy implementation
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished, pixel-perfect interface designs
+- **Design System Implementation**: Component libraries, design tokens, and style guides
+- **Micro-Interactions & Animations**: Transition effects, loading states, and interactive feedback
+- **Responsive Design**: Layout adaptations for different screen sizes and devices
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Concrete Visual Interface Implementation)**
+- **Visual Design Language**: Colors, typography, iconography, spacing, and overall aesthetic
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished designs showing exactly how the interface will look
+- **Design System Components**: Building and documenting reusable UI components (buttons, inputs, cards, etc.)
+- **Design Tokens**: Defining variables for colors, spacing, typography that can be used in code
+- **Micro-Interactions**: Hover states, transitions, animations, and interactive feedback details
+- **Responsive Layouts**: Adapting designs for mobile, tablet, and desktop breakpoints
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **User Research & Personas**: User behavior analysis and needs assessment → Defers to **UX Expert**
+- **Information Architecture**: Content structure and navigation strategy → Defers to **UX Expert**
+- **Low-Fidelity Wireframes**: Structural layouts without visual design → Defers to **UX Expert**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **FROM UX Expert**: Receives wireframes, user flows, and information architecture as the foundation for visual design
+- **TO Frontend Developers**: Provides design specifications, component libraries, and design tokens for implementation
+- **WITH API Designer**: Coordinates on data presentation and form validation feedback (visual aspects only)
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
@@ -202,4 +218,4 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Integration Points
 - **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UI/UX insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
-- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ux-expert.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: ux-expert
 description: Generate or update ux-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert [topic]
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
@@ -22,10 +17,31 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
 ### Analysis Scope
-- **User Interface Design**: Visual hierarchy, layout patterns, and component design
-- **Interaction Patterns**: User flows, navigation, and microinteractions
-- **Usability Optimization**: Accessibility, cognitive load, and user testing strategies
-- **Design Systems**: Component libraries, design tokens, and consistency frameworks
+- **User Research**: User personas, behavioral analysis, and needs assessment
+- **Information Architecture**: Content structure, navigation hierarchy, and mental models
+- **User Journey Mapping**: User flows, task analysis, and interaction models
+- **Usability Strategy**: Accessibility planning, cognitive load reduction, and user testing frameworks
+- **Wireframing**: Low-fidelity layouts and structural prototypes (not visual design)
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Abstract User Experience & Research)**
+- **User Research & Personas**: Understanding target users, their goals, pain points, and behaviors
+- **Information Architecture**: Organizing content and defining navigation structures at a conceptual level
+- **User Journey Mapping**: Defining user flows, task sequences, and interaction models
+- **Wireframes & Low-Fidelity Prototypes**: Structural layouts showing information hierarchy (boxes and arrows, not colors/fonts)
+- **Usability Testing Strategy**: Planning user testing, A/B tests, and validation methods
+- **Accessibility Planning**: WCAG compliance strategy and inclusive design principles
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **Visual Design**: Colors, typography, spacing, visual style → Defers to **UI Designer**
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished, pixel-perfect designs → Defers to **UI Designer**
+- **Component Implementation**: Design system components, CSS, animations → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO UI Designer**: Provides wireframes, user flows, and information architecture that UI Designer will transform into high-fidelity visual designs
+- **FROM User Research**: May receive external research data to inform UX decisions
+- **TO Product Owner**: Provides user insights and validation results to inform feature prioritization
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 

.claude/commands/workflow/concept-clarify.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: concept-clarify
 description: Identify underspecified areas in brainstorming artifacts through targeted clarification questions before action planning
-usage: /workflow:concept-clarify [--session <session-id>]
-argument-hint: "optional: --session <session-id>"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:concept-clarify
-  - /workflow:concept-clarify --session WFS-auth
+argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/execute.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: execute
 description: Coordinate agents for existing workflow tasks with automatic discovery
-usage: /workflow:execute [--resume-session="session-id"]
-argument-hint: [--resume-session="session-id"]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:execute
-  - /workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-user-auth"
+argument-hint: "[--resume-session=\"session-id\"]"
 ---
 
 # Workflow Execute Command
@@ -429,10 +425,28 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
         "on_error": "skip_optional|fail|retry_once"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement following consolidated synthesis specification...",
-      "modification_points": ["Apply synthesis specification requirements..."]
-    },
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Implement task following synthesis specification",
+        "description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
+          "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
+          "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
+          "Integrate with existing patterns"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load synthesis specification",
+          "Parse architecture and requirements",
+          "Implement following specification",
+          "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
+          "Validate against acceptance criteria"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "implementation"
+      }
+    ],
     "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
   }
 }

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/close.md

@@ -1,142 +0,0 @@
----
-name: close
-description: Close a completed or obsolete workflow issue
-usage: /workflow:issue:close <issue-id> [reason]
-
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:close ISS-001
-  - /workflow:issue:close ISS-001 "Feature implemented in PR #42"
-  - /workflow:issue:close ISS-002 "Duplicate of ISS-001"
----
-
-# Close Workflow Issue (/workflow:issue:close)
-
-## Purpose
-Mark an issue as closed/resolved with optional reason documentation.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:close <issue-id> ["reason"]
-```
-
-## Closing Process
-
-### Quick Close
-Simple closure without reason:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:close ISS-001
-```
-
-### Close with Reason
-Include closure reason:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:close ISS-001 "Feature implemented in PR #42"
-/workflow/issue/close ISS-002 "Duplicate of ISS-001"  
-/workflow/issue/close ISS-003 "No longer relevant"
-```
-
-### Interactive Close (Default)
-Without reason, prompts for details:
-```
-Closing Issue ISS-001: Add OAuth2 social login support
-Current Status: Open | Priority: High | Type: Feature
-
-Why is this issue being closed?
-1. ✅ Completed - Issue resolved successfully
-2. 🔄 Duplicate - Duplicate of another issue
-3. ❌ Invalid - Issue is invalid or not applicable  
-4. 🚫 Won't Fix - Decided not to implement
-5. 📝 Custom reason
-
-Choice: _
-```
-
-## Closure Categories
-
-### Completed (Default)
-- Issue was successfully resolved
-- Implementation finished
-- Requirements met
-- Ready for review/testing
-
-### Duplicate
-- Same as existing issue
-- Consolidated into another issue
-- Reference to primary issue provided
-
-### Invalid
-- Issue description unclear
-- Not a valid problem/request
-- Outside project scope
-- Misunderstanding resolved
-
-### Won't Fix
-- Decided not to implement
-- Business decision to decline
-- Technical constraints prevent
-- Priority too low
-
-### Custom Reason
-- Specific project context
-- Detailed explanation needed
-- Complex closure scenario
-
-## Closure Effects
-
-### Status Update
-- Changes status from "open" to "closed"
-- Records closure details
-- Saves closure reason and category
-
-### Integration Cleanup
-- Unlinks from workflow tasks (if integrated)
-- Removes from active TodoWrite items
-- Updates session statistics
-
-### History Preservation
-- Maintains full issue history
-- Records closure details
-- Preserves for future reference
-
-## Session Updates
-
-### Statistics
-Updates session issue counts:
-- Decrements open issues
-- Increments closed issues
-- Updates completion metrics
-
-### Progress Tracking
-- Updates workflow progress
-- Refreshes TodoWrite status
-- Updates session health metrics
-
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Issue closure confirmation
-- Closure reason and category
-- Updated session statistics  
-- Related actions taken
-
-## Reopening
-Closed issues can be reopened:
-```bash
-/workflow/issue/update ISS-001 --status=open
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Issue not found**: Lists available open issues
-- **Already closed**: Shows current status and closure info
-- **Integration conflicts**: Handles task unlinking gracefully
-- **File errors**: Validates and repairs issue files
-
-## Archive Management
-Closed issues:
-- Remain in .issues/ directory
-- Are excluded from default listings
-- Can be viewed with `/workflow/issue/list --closed`
-- Maintain full searchability
-
----
-
-**Result**: Issue properly closed with documented reason and session cleanup

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/create.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
----
-name: create
-description: Create a new issue or change request
-usage: /workflow:issue:create "issue description"
-
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:create "Add OAuth2 social login support"
-  - /workflow:issue:create "Fix user avatar security vulnerability"
----
-
-# Create Workflow Issue (/workflow:issue:create)
-
-## Purpose
-Create a new issue or change request within the current workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:create "issue description"
-```
-
-## Automatic Behavior
-
-### Issue ID Generation
-- Generates unique ID: ISS-001, ISS-002, etc.
-- Sequential numbering within session
-- Stored in session's .issues/ directory
-
-### Type Detection
-Automatically detects issue type from description:
-- **Bug**: Contains words like "fix", "error", "bug", "broken"
-- **Feature**: Contains words like "add", "implement", "create", "new"
-- **Optimization**: Contains words like "improve", "optimize", "performance"
-- **Documentation**: Contains words like "document", "readme", "docs"
-- **Refactor**: Contains words like "refactor", "cleanup", "restructure"
-
-### Priority Assessment
-Auto-assigns priority based on keywords:
-- **Critical**: "critical", "urgent", "blocker", "security"
-- **High**: "important", "major", "significant"
-- **Medium**: Default for most issues
-- **Low**: "minor", "enhancement", "nice-to-have"
-
-## Issue Storage
-
-### File Structure
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[session]/.issues/
-├── ISS-001.json          # Issue metadata
-├── ISS-002.json          # Another issue
-└── issue-registry.json   # Issue index
-```
-
-### Issue Metadata
-Each issue stores:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "ISS-001",
-  "title": "Add OAuth2 social login support",
-  "type": "feature",
-  "priority": "high",
-  "status": "open",
-  "created_at": "2025-09-08T10:00:00Z",
-  "category": "authentication",
-  "estimated_impact": "medium",
-  "blocking": false,
-  "session_id": "WFS-oauth-integration"
-}
-```
-
-## Session Integration
-
-### Active Session Check
-- Uses current active session (marker file)
-- Creates .issues/ directory if needed
-- Updates session's issue tracking
-
-### TodoWrite Integration
-Optionally adds to task list:
-- Creates todo for issue investigation
-- Links issue to implementation tasks
-- Updates progress tracking
-
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Generated issue ID
-- Detected type and priority
-- Storage location
-- Integration status
-- Quick actions available
-
-## Quick Actions
-After creation:
-- **View**: `/workflow:issue:list`
-- **Update**: `/workflow:issue:update ISS-001`
-- **Integrate**: Link to workflow tasks
-- **Close**: `/workflow:issue:close ISS-001`
-
-## Error Handling
-- **No active session**: Prompts to start session first
-- **Directory creation**: Handles permission issues
-- **Duplicate description**: Warns about similar issues
-- **Invalid description**: Prompts for meaningful description
-
----
-
-**Result**: New issue created and ready for management within workflow

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/list.md

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
----
-name: list
-description: List and filter workflow issues
-usage: /workflow:issue:list
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:list
-  - /workflow:issue:list --open
-  - /workflow:issue:list --priority=high
----
-
-# List Workflow Issues (/workflow:issue:list)
-
-## Purpose
-Display all issues and change requests within the current workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:list [filter]
-```
-
-## Optional Filters
-Simple keyword-based filtering:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:list --open           # Only open issues
-/workflow:issue:list --closed         # Only closed issues
-/workflow:issue:list --critical       # Critical priority
-/workflow:issue:list --high           # High priority
-/workflow:issue:list --bug            # Bug type issues
-/workflow:issue:list --feature        # Feature type issues
-/workflow:issue:list --blocking       # Blocking issues only
-```
-
-## Display Format
-
-### Open Issues
-```
-🔴 ISS-001: Add OAuth2 social login support
-   Type: Feature | Priority: High | Created: 2025-09-07
-   Status: Open | Impact: Medium
-   
-🔴 ISS-002: Fix user avatar security vulnerability  
-   Type: Bug | Priority: Critical | Created: 2025-09-08
-   Status: Open | Impact: High | 🚫 BLOCKING
-```
-
-### Closed Issues
-```
-✅ ISS-003: Update authentication documentation
-   Type: Documentation | Priority: Low
-   Status: Closed | Completed: 2025-09-05
-   Reason: Documentation updated in PR #45
-```
-
-### Integrated Issues
-```
-🔗 ISS-004: Implement rate limiting
-   Type: Feature | Priority: Medium
-   Status: Integrated → IMPL-003
-   Integrated: 2025-09-06 | Task: IMPL-3.json
-```
-
-## Summary Stats
-```
-📊 Issue Summary for WFS-oauth-integration:
-   Total: 4 issues
-   🔴 Open: 2 | ✅ Closed: 1 | 🔗 Integrated: 1
-   🚫 Blocking: 1 | ⚡ Critical: 1 | 📈 High: 1
-```
-
-## Empty State
-If no issues exist:
-```
-No issues found for current session.
-
-Create your first issue:
-/workflow:issue:create "describe the issue or request"
-```
-
-## Quick Actions
-For each issue, shows available actions:
-- **Update**: `/workflow:issue:update ISS-001`
-- **Integrate**: Link to workflow tasks  
-- **Close**: `/workflow:issue:close ISS-001`
-- **View Details**: Full issue information
-
-## Session Context
-- Lists issues from current active session
-- Shows session name and directory
-- Indicates if .issues/ directory exists
-
-## Sorting
-Issues are sorted by:
-1. Blocking status (blocking first)
-2. Priority (critical → high → medium → low)
-3. Creation date (newest first)
-
-## Performance
-- Fast loading from JSON files
-- Cached issue registry
-- Efficient filtering
-
----
-
-**Result**: Complete overview of all workflow issues with their current status

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/update.md

@@ -1,135 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update
-description: Update an existing workflow issue
-usage: /workflow:issue:update <issue-id> [changes]
-
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:update ISS-001
-  - /workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --priority=critical
-  - /workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --status=closed
----
-
-# Update Workflow Issue (/workflow:issue:update)
-
-## Purpose
-Modify attributes and status of an existing workflow issue.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:update <issue-id> [options]
-```
-
-## Quick Updates
-Simple attribute changes:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --priority=critical
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --status=closed
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --blocking
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --type=bug
-```
-
-## Interactive Mode (Default)
-Without options, opens interactive editor:
-```
-Issue ISS-001: Add OAuth2 social login support
-Current Status: Open | Priority: High | Type: Feature
-
-What would you like to update?
-1. Status (open → closed/integrated)
-2. Priority (high → critical/medium/low)  
-3. Type (feature → bug/optimization/etc)
-4. Description
-5. Add comment
-6. Toggle blocking status
-7. Cancel
-
-Choice: _
-```
-
-## Available Updates
-
-### Status Changes
-- **open** → **closed**: Issue resolved
-- **open** → **integrated**: Linked to workflow task
-- **closed** → **open**: Reopen issue
-- **integrated** → **open**: Unlink from tasks
-
-### Priority Levels
-- **critical**: Urgent, blocking progress
-- **high**: Important, should address soon
-- **medium**: Standard priority
-- **low**: Nice-to-have, can defer
-
-### Issue Types  
-- **bug**: Something broken that needs fixing
-- **feature**: New functionality to implement
-- **optimization**: Performance or efficiency improvement
-- **refactor**: Code structure improvement
-- **documentation**: Documentation updates
-
-### Additional Options
-- **blocking/non-blocking**: Whether issue blocks progress
-- **description**: Update issue description
-- **comments**: Add notes and updates
-
-## Update Process
-
-### Validation
-- Verifies issue exists in current session
-- Checks valid status transitions
-- Validates priority and type values
-
-### Change Tracking
-- Records update details
-- Tracks who made changes
-- Maintains change history
-
-### File Updates
-- Updates ISS-XXX.json file
-- Refreshes issue-registry.json
-- Updates session statistics
-
-## Change History
-Maintains audit trail:
-```json
-{
-  "changes": [
-    {
-      "field": "priority",
-      "old_value": "high",
-      "new_value": "critical",
-      "reason": "Security implications discovered"
-    }
-  ]
-}
-```
-
-## Integration Effects
-
-### Task Integration
-When status changes to "integrated":
-- Links to workflow task (optional)
-- Updates task context with issue reference
-- Creates bidirectional linking
-
-### Session Updates
-- Updates session issue statistics
-- Refreshes TodoWrite if applicable
-- Updates workflow progress tracking
-
-## Output
-Shows:
-- What was changed
-- Before and after values
-- Integration status
-- Available next actions
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Issue not found**: Lists available issues
-- **Invalid status**: Shows valid transitions
-- **Permission errors**: Clear error messages
-- **File corruption**: Validates and repairs
-
----
-
-**Result**: Issue successfully updated with change tracking and integration

.claude/commands/workflow/plan.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: plan
 description: Orchestrate 4-phase planning workflow by executing commands and passing context between phases
-usage: /workflow:plan [--agent] <input>
-argument-hint: "[--agent] \"text description\"|file.md|ISS-001"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
-  - /workflow:plan --agent "Build authentication system"
-  - /workflow:plan requirements.md
-  - /workflow:plan ISS-001
+argument-hint: "[--agent] [--cli-execute] \"text description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -36,6 +30,7 @@ This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes,
 **Execution Modes**:
 - **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate`
 - **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent`
+- **CLI Execute Mode** (`--cli-execute`): Generate tasks with Codex execution commands
 
 ## Core Rules
 
@@ -114,6 +109,14 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **After Phase 3**: Return to user showing Phase 3 results, then auto-continue to Phase 4
 
+**Memory State Check**:
+- Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
+- If memory usage is high (>110K tokens or approaching context limits):
+  - **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/compact")`
+  - This optimizes memory before proceeding to Phase 4
+- Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
+- Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
+
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Task Generation
@@ -124,9 +127,23 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 - **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
 - Task generation translates high-level specifications into concrete, actionable work items
 
-**Command**:
+**Command Selection**:
 - Manual: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate --session [sessionId]")`
 - Agent: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")`
+- CLI Execute: Add `--cli-execute` flag to either command
+
+**Flag Combination**:
+- `--cli-execute` alone: Manual task generation with CLI execution
+- `--agent --cli-execute`: Agent task generation with CLI execution
+
+**Command Examples**:
+```bash
+# Manual with CLI execution
+/workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
+
+# Agent with CLI execution
+/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
+```
 
 **Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
 
@@ -202,12 +219,6 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
    - Extract goal, scope, requirements
    - Format into structured description
 
-4. **Issue Reference** (e.g., `ISS-001`) → Read and structure:
-   - Read issue file
-   - Extract title as goal
-   - Extract description as scope/context
-   - Format into structured description
-
 ## Data Flow
 
 ```
@@ -266,7 +277,10 @@ Return summary to user
 ✅ Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
 ✅ Pass session ID and context path to Phase 3 command
 ✅ Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md after Phase 3
-✅ Select correct Phase 4 command based on --agent flag
+✅ **Build Phase 4 command** based on flags:
+  - Base command: `/workflow:tools:task-generate` (or `-agent` if `--agent` flag)
+  - Add `--session [sessionId]`
+  - Add `--cli-execute` if flag present
 ✅ Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
 ✅ Verify all Phase 4 outputs
 ✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
@@ -297,4 +311,4 @@ CONSTRAINTS: [Limitations or boundaries]
 
 # Phase 2
 /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-123 "GOAL: Build authentication\nSCOPE: JWT, login, registration\nCONTEXT: REST API"
-```
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/resume.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: resume
 description: Intelligent workflow session resumption with automatic progress analysis
-usage: /workflow:resume "<session-id>"
 argument-hint: "session-id for workflow session to resume"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:resume "WFS-user-auth"
-  - /workflow:resume "WFS-api-integration"
-  - /workflow:resume "WFS-database-migration"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/review.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: review
 description: Optional specialized review (security, architecture, docs) for completed implementation
-usage: /workflow:review [--type=<type>] [session-id]
-argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [session-id]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:review                           # Quality review of active session
-  - /workflow:review --type=security           # Security audit of active session
-  - /workflow:review --type=architecture WFS-user-auth  # Architecture review of specific session
-  - /workflow:review --type=action-items       # Pre-deployment verification
+argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [optional: session-id]"
 ---
 
 ### 🚀 Command Overview: `/workflow:review`

.claude/commands/workflow/session/complete.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: complete
 description: Mark the active workflow session as complete and remove active flag
-usage: /workflow:session:complete
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:complete
   - /workflow:session:complete --detailed

.claude/commands/workflow/session/list.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: list
 description: List all workflow sessions with status
-usage: /workflow:session:list
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:list
 ---

.claude/commands/workflow/session/pause.md

@@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pause
-description: Pause the active workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:pause
-examples:
-  - /workflow:session:pause
----
-
-# Pause Workflow Session (/workflow:session:pause)
-
-## Overview
-Pause the currently active workflow session, saving all state for later resumption.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:session:pause      # Pause current active session
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Step 1: Find Active Session
-```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
-```
-
-### Step 2: Get Session Name
-```bash
-basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//'
-```
-
-### Step 3: Update Session Status
-```bash
-jq '.status = "paused"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 4: Add Pause Timestamp
-```bash
-jq '.paused_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 5: Remove Active Marker
-```bash
-rm .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Find active session**: `ls .workflow/.active-*`
-- **Get session name**: `basename marker | sed 's/^\.active-//'`
-- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "paused"' session.json > temp.json`
-- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.paused_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
-- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-session`
-
-### Pause Result
-```
-Session WFS-user-auth paused
-- Status: paused
-- Paused at: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
-- Tasks preserved: 8 tasks
-- Can resume with: /workflow:session:resume
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:resume` - Resume paused session
-- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all sessions including paused
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Check session state

.claude/commands/workflow/session/resume.md

@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: resume
 description: Resume the most recently paused workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:resume
-examples:
-  - /workflow:session:resume
 ---
 
 # Resume Workflow Session (/workflow:session:resume)

.claude/commands/workflow/session/start.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: start
 description: Discover existing sessions or start a new workflow session with intelligent session management
-usage: /workflow:session:start [--auto|--new] [task_description]
 argument-hint: [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:start

.claude/commands/workflow/session/switch.md

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
----
-name: switch
-description: Switch to a different workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:switch <session-id>
-argument-hint: session-id to switch to
-examples:
-  - /workflow:session:switch WFS-oauth-integration
-  - /workflow:session:switch WFS-user-profile
----
-
-# Switch Workflow Session (/workflow:session:switch)
-
-## Overview
-Switch the active session to a different workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:session:switch WFS-session-name     # Switch to specific session
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Step 1: Validate Target Session
-```bash
-test -d .workflow/WFS-target-session && echo "Session exists"
-```
-
-### Step 2: Pause Current Session
-```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
-jq '.status = "paused"' .workflow/current-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-```
-
-### Step 3: Remove Current Active Marker
-```bash
-rm .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-### Step 4: Activate Target Session
-```bash
-jq '.status = "active"' .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 5: Create New Active Marker
-```bash
-touch .workflow/.active-WFS-target-session
-```
-
-### Step 6: Add Switch Timestamp
-```bash
-jq '.switched_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Check session exists**: `test -d .workflow/WFS-session`
-- **Find current active**: `ls .workflow/.active-*`
-- **Pause current**: `jq '.status = "paused"' session.json > temp.json`
-- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-*`
-- **Activate target**: `jq '.status = "active"' target.json > temp.json`
-- **Create marker**: `touch .workflow/.active-target`
-
-### Switch Result
-```
-Switched to session: WFS-oauth-integration
-- Previous: WFS-user-auth (paused)
-- Current: WFS-oauth-integration (active)
-- Switched at: 2025-09-15T15:45:00Z
-- Ready for: /workflow:execute
-```
-
-### Error Handling
-```bash
-# Session not found
-test -d .workflow/WFS-nonexistent || echo "Error: Session not found"
-
-# No sessions available
-ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null || echo "No sessions available"
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all available sessions
-- `/workflow:session:pause` - Pause current before switching
-- `/workflow:execute` - Continue with new active session

.claude/commands/workflow/status.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: workflow:status
 description: Generate on-demand views from JSON task data
-usage: /workflow:status [task-id]
-argument-hint: [optional: task-id]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:status
-  - /workflow:status impl-1
-  - /workflow:status --validate
+argument-hint: "[optional: task-id]"
 ---
 
 # Workflow Status Command (/workflow:status)

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-plan.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-plan
 description: Orchestrate TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chains
-usage: /workflow:tdd-plan [--agent] <input>
-argument-hint: "[--agent] \"feature description\"|file.md|ISS-001"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tdd-plan "Implement user authentication"
-  - /workflow:tdd-plan --agent requirements.md
-  - /workflow:tdd-plan ISS-001
+argument-hint: "[--agent] \"feature description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-verify.md

@@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-verify
 description: Verify TDD workflow compliance and generate quality report
-usage: /workflow:tdd-verify [session-id]
-argument-hint: "[WFS-session-id]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tdd-verify
-  - /workflow:tdd-verify WFS-auth
+
+argument-hint: "[optional: WFS-session-id]"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/test-gen.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: test-gen
 description: Create independent test-fix workflow session by analyzing completed implementation
-usage: /workflow:test-gen [--use-codex] <source-session-id>
-argument-hint: "[--use-codex] <source-session-id>"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
-  - /workflow:test-gen --use-codex WFS-api-refactor
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] source-session-id"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -127,11 +123,12 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session [testSessionId]")`
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session [testSessionId]")`
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
-- `--use-codex` flag (if present in original command)
+- `--use-codex` flag (if present in original command) - Controls IMPL-002 fix mode
+- `--cli-execute` flag (if present in original command) - Controls IMPL-001 generation mode
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/concept-enhanced.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: concept-enhanced
 description: Enhanced intelligent analysis with parallel CLI execution and design blueprint generation
-usage: /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session <session_id> --context <context_package_path>
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --context path/to/context-package.json"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session WFS-auth --context .workflow/WFS-auth/.process/context-package.json
@@ -11,47 +10,40 @@ examples:
 # Enhanced Analysis Command (/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced)
 
 ## Overview
-Advanced solution design and feasibility analysis engine with parallel CLI execution that processes standardized context packages and produces comprehensive technical analysis focused on solution improvements, key design decisions, and critical insights.
+Advanced solution design and feasibility analysis engine with parallel CLI execution. Processes standardized context packages to produce ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focused on solution improvements, key design decisions, and critical insights.
 
-**Analysis Focus**: Produces ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with solution design, architectural rationale, feasibility assessment, and optimization strategies. Does NOT generate task breakdowns or implementation plans.
+**Scope**: Solution-focused technical analysis only. Does NOT generate task breakdowns or implementation plans.
 
-**Independent Usage**: This command can be called directly by users or as part of the `/workflow:plan` command. It accepts context packages and provides solution-focused technical analysis.
+**Usage**: Standalone command or integrated into `/workflow:plan`. Accepts context packages and orchestrates Gemini/Codex for comprehensive analysis.
 
-## Core Philosophy
-- **Solution-Focused**: Emphasize design decisions, architectural rationale, and critical insights
-- **Context-Driven**: Precise analysis based on comprehensive context packages
-- **Intelligent Tool Selection**: Choose optimal tools based on task complexity (Gemini for design, Codex for validation)
+## Core Philosophy & Responsibilities
+- **Solution-Focused Analysis**: Emphasize design decisions, architectural rationale, and critical insights (exclude task planning)
+- **Context-Driven**: Parse and validate context-package.json for precise analysis
+- **Intelligent Tool Selection**: Gemini for design (all tasks), Codex for validation (complex tasks only)
 - **Parallel Execution**: Execute multiple CLI tools simultaneously for efficiency
-- **No Task Planning**: Exclude implementation steps, task breakdowns, and project planning
+- **Solution Design**: Evaluate architecture, identify key design decisions with rationale
+- **Feasibility Assessment**: Analyze technical complexity, risks, implementation readiness
+- **Optimization Recommendations**: Performance, security, and code quality improvements
+- **Perspective Synthesis**: Integrate multi-tool insights into unified assessment
 - **Single Output**: Generate only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with technical analysis
 
-## Core Responsibilities
-- **Context Package Parsing**: Read and validate context-package.json
-- **Parallel CLI Orchestration**: Execute Gemini (solution design) and optionally Codex (feasibility validation)
-- **Solution Design Analysis**: Evaluate architecture, identify key design decisions with rationale
-- **Feasibility Assessment**: Analyze technical complexity, risks, and implementation readiness
-- **Optimization Recommendations**: Propose performance, security, and code quality improvements
-- **Perspective Synthesis**: Integrate Gemini and Codex insights into unified solution assessment
-- **Technical Analysis Report**: Generate ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focused on design decisions and critical insights (NO task planning)
-
 ## Analysis Strategy Selection
 
 ### Tool Selection by Task Complexity
 
 **Simple Tasks (≤3 modules)**:
-- **Primary Tool**: Gemini (rapid understanding and pattern recognition)
-- **Support Tool**: Code-index (structural analysis)
-- **Execution Mode**: Single-round analysis, focus on existing patterns
+- **Primary**: Gemini (rapid understanding + pattern recognition)
+- **Support**: Code-index (structural analysis)
+- **Mode**: Single-round analysis
 
 **Medium Tasks (4-6 modules)**:
-- **Primary Tool**: Gemini (comprehensive single-round analysis and architecture design)
-- **Support Tools**: Code-index + Exa (external best practices)
-- **Execution Mode**: Single comprehensive analysis covering understanding + architecture design
+- **Primary**: Gemini (comprehensive analysis + architecture design)
+- **Support**: Code-index + Exa (best practices)
+- **Mode**: Single comprehensive round
 
 **Complex Tasks (>6 modules)**:
-- **Primary Tools**: Gemini (single comprehensive analysis) + Codex (implementation validation)
-- **Analysis Strategy**: Gemini handles understanding + architecture in one round, Codex validates implementation
-- **Execution Mode**: Parallel execution - Gemini comprehensive analysis + Codex validation
+- **Primary**: Gemini (comprehensive analysis) + Codex (validation)
+- **Mode**: Parallel execution - Gemini design + Codex feasibility
 
 ### Tool Preferences by Tech Stack
 
@@ -78,168 +70,82 @@ Advanced solution design and feasibility analysis engine with parallel CLI execu
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
 ### Phase 1: Validation & Preparation
-1. **Session Validation**
-   - Verify session directory exists: `.workflow/{session_id}/`
-   - Load session metadata from `workflow-session.json`
-   - Validate session state and task context
-
-2. **Context Package Validation**
-   - Verify context package exists at specified path
-   - Validate JSON format and structure
-   - Assess context package size and complexity
-
-3. **Task Analysis & Classification**
-   - Parse task description and extract keywords
-   - Identify technical domain and complexity level
-   - Determine required analysis depth and scope
-   - Load existing session context and task summaries
-
-4. **Tool Selection Strategy**
-   - **Simple/Medium Tasks**: Single Gemini comprehensive analysis
-   - **Complex Tasks**: Gemini comprehensive + Codex validation
-   - Load appropriate prompt templates and configurations
+1. **Session Validation**: Verify `.workflow/{session_id}/` exists, load `workflow-session.json`
+2. **Context Package Validation**: Verify path, validate JSON format and structure
+3. **Task Analysis**: Extract keywords, identify domain/complexity, determine scope
+4. **Tool Selection**: Gemini (all tasks), +Codex (complex only), load templates
 
 ### Phase 2: Analysis Preparation
-1. **Workspace Setup**
-   - Create analysis output directory: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/`
-   - Initialize log files and monitoring structures
-   - Set process limits and resource management
-
-2. **Context Optimization**
-   - Filter high-priority assets from context package
-   - Organize project structure and dependencies
-   - Prepare template references and rule configurations
-
-3. **Execution Environment**
-   - Configure CLI tools with write permissions
-   - Set timeout parameters and monitoring intervals
-   - Prepare error handling and recovery mechanisms
+1. **Workspace Setup**: Create `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/`, initialize logs, set resource limits
+2. **Context Optimization**: Filter high-priority assets, organize structure, prepare templates
+3. **Execution Environment**: Configure CLI tools, set timeouts, prepare error handling
 
 ### Phase 3: Parallel Analysis Execution
 1. **Gemini Solution Design & Architecture Analysis**
-   - **Tool Configuration**:
-     ```bash
-     ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-     PURPOSE: Analyze and design optimal solution for {task_description}
-     TASK: Evaluate current architecture, propose solution design, and identify key design decisions
-     CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
+   ```bash
+   ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+   PURPOSE: Analyze and design optimal solution for {task_description}
+   TASK: Evaluate current architecture, propose solution design, identify key design decisions
+   CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
 
-     **MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json to understand:
-     - Task requirements from metadata.task_description
-     - Relevant source files from assets[] array
-     - Tech stack from tech_stack section
-     - Project structure from statistics section
+   **MANDATORY**: Read context-package.json to understand task requirements, source files, tech stack, project structure
 
-     **ANALYSIS PRIORITY - Use ALL source documents from context-package assets[]**:
-     1. PRIMARY SOURCES (Highest Priority): Individual role analysis.md files (system-architect, ui-designer, product-manager, etc.)
-        - These contain complete technical details, design rationale, ADRs, and decision context
-        - Extract: Technical specs, API schemas, design tokens, caching configs, performance metrics
-     2. SYNTHESIS REFERENCE (Medium Priority): synthesis-specification.md
-        - Use for integrated requirements and cross-role alignment
-        - Validate decisions and identify integration points
-     3. TOPIC FRAMEWORK (Low Priority): topic-framework.md for discussion context
+   **ANALYSIS PRIORITY**:
+   1. PRIMARY: Individual role analysis.md files (system-architect, ui-designer, etc.) - technical details, ADRs, decision context
+   2. SECONDARY: synthesis-specification.md - integrated requirements, cross-role alignment
+   3. REFERENCE: topic-framework.md - discussion context
 
-     EXPECTED:
-     1. CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS: Existing patterns, code structure, integration points, technical debt
-     2. SOLUTION DESIGN: Core architecture principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale
-     3. CRITICAL INSIGHTS: What works well, identified gaps, technical risks, architectural tradeoffs
-     4. OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES: Performance improvements, security enhancements, code quality recommendations
-     5. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Complexity analysis, compatibility evaluation, implementation readiness
-     6. **OUTPUT FILE**: Write complete analysis to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
+   EXPECTED:
+   1. CURRENT STATE: Existing patterns, code structure, integration points, technical debt
+   2. SOLUTION DESIGN: Core principles, system design, key decisions with rationale
+   3. CRITICAL INSIGHTS: Strengths, gaps, risks, tradeoffs
+   4. OPTIMIZATION: Performance, security, code quality recommendations
+   5. FEASIBILITY: Complexity analysis, compatibility, implementation readiness
+   6. OUTPUT: Write to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
 
-     RULES:
-     - Focus on SOLUTION IMPROVEMENTS and KEY DESIGN DECISIONS, NOT task planning
-     - Provide architectural rationale, evaluate alternatives, assess tradeoffs
-     - **CRITICAL**: Identify code targets - existing files as "file:function:lines", new files as "file"
-     - For modifications: specify exact files/functions/line ranges
-     - For new files: specify file path only (no function or lines)
-     - Do NOT create task lists, implementation steps, or code examples
-     - Do NOT generate any code snippets or implementation details
-     - **MUST write output to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md**
-     - Output ONLY architectural analysis and design recommendations
-     " --approval-mode yolo
-     ```
-   - **Output Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
+   RULES:
+   - Focus on SOLUTION IMPROVEMENTS and KEY DESIGN DECISIONS (NO task planning)
+   - Identify code targets: existing "file:function:lines", new files "file"
+   - Do NOT create task lists, implementation steps, or code examples
+   " --approval-mode yolo
+   ```
+   Output: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
 
 2. **Codex Technical Feasibility Validation** (Complex Tasks Only)
-   - **Tool Configuration**:
-     ```bash
-     codex --full-auto exec "
-     PURPOSE: Validate technical feasibility and identify implementation risks for {task_description}
-     TASK: Assess implementation complexity, validate technology choices, evaluate performance and security implications
-     CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
+   ```bash
+   codex --full-auto exec "
+   PURPOSE: Validate technical feasibility and identify implementation risks for {task_description}
+   TASK: Assess complexity, validate technology choices, evaluate performance/security implications
+   CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
 
-     **MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze:
-     - .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json for task context
-     - .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md for proposed solution design
-     - Relevant source files listed in context-package.json assets[]
+   **MANDATORY**: Read context-package.json, gemini-solution-design.md, and relevant source files
 
-     EXPECTED:
-     1. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Technical complexity rating, resource requirements, technology compatibility
-     2. RISK ANALYSIS: Implementation risks, integration challenges, performance concerns, security vulnerabilities
-     3. TECHNICAL VALIDATION: Development approach validation, quality standards assessment, maintenance implications
-     4. CRITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Must-have requirements, optimization opportunities, security controls
-     5. **OUTPUT FILE**: Write validation results to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
+   EXPECTED:
+   1. FEASIBILITY: Complexity rating, resource requirements, technology compatibility
+   2. RISK ANALYSIS: Implementation risks, integration challenges, performance/security concerns
+   3. VALIDATION: Development approach, quality standards, maintenance implications
+   4. RECOMMENDATIONS: Must-have requirements, optimization opportunities, security controls
+   5. OUTPUT: Write to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
 
-     RULES:
-     - Focus on TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY and RISK ASSESSMENT, NOT implementation planning
-     - Validate architectural decisions, identify potential issues, recommend optimizations
-     - **CRITICAL**: Verify code targets - existing files "file:function:lines", new files "file"
-     - Confirm exact locations for modifications, identify additional new files if needed
-     - Do NOT create task breakdowns, step-by-step guides, or code examples
-     - Do NOT generate any code snippets or implementation details
-     - **MUST write output to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md**
-     - Output ONLY feasibility analysis and risk assessment
-     " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-     ```
-   - **Output Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
+   RULES:
+   - Focus on TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY and RISK ASSESSMENT (NO implementation planning)
+   - Verify code targets: existing "file:function:lines", new files "file"
+   - Do NOT create task breakdowns, step-by-step guides, or code examples
+   " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+   ```
+   Output: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
 
-3. **Parallel Execution Management**
-   - Launch both tools simultaneously for complex tasks
-   - Monitor execution progress with timeout controls
-   - Handle process completion and error scenarios
-   - Maintain execution logs for debugging and recovery
+3. **Parallel Execution**: Launch tools simultaneously, monitor progress, handle completion/errors, maintain logs
 
 ### Phase 4: Results Collection & Synthesis
-1. **Output Validation & Collection**
-   - **Gemini Results**: Validate `gemini-solution-design.md` contains complete solution analysis
-   - **Codex Results**: For complex tasks, validate `codex-feasibility-validation.md` with technical assessment
-   - **Fallback Processing**: Use execution logs if primary outputs are incomplete
-   - **Status Classification**: Mark each tool as completed, partial, failed, or skipped
-
-2. **Quality Assessment**
-   - **Design Quality**: Verify architectural decisions have clear rationale and alternatives analysis
-   - **Insight Depth**: Assess quality of critical insights and risk identification
-   - **Feasibility Rigor**: Validate completeness of technical feasibility assessment
-   - **Optimization Value**: Check actionability of optimization recommendations
-
-3. **Analysis Synthesis Strategy**
-   - **Simple/Medium Tasks**: Direct integration of Gemini solution design
-   - **Complex Tasks**: Synthesis of Gemini design with Codex feasibility validation
-   - **Conflict Resolution**: Identify architectural disagreements and provide balanced resolution
-   - **Confidence Scoring**: Assess overall solution confidence based on multi-tool consensus
+1. **Output Validation**: Validate gemini-solution-design.md (all), codex-feasibility-validation.md (complex), use logs if incomplete, classify status
+2. **Quality Assessment**: Verify design rationale, insight depth, feasibility rigor, optimization value
+3. **Synthesis Strategy**: Direct integration (simple/medium), multi-tool synthesis (complex), resolve conflicts, score confidence
 
 ### Phase 5: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Generation
-1. **Structured Report Assembly**
-   - **Executive Summary**: Analysis focus, overall assessment, recommendation status
-   - **Current State Analysis**: Architecture overview, compatibility, critical findings
-   - **Proposed Solution Design**: Core principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale
-   - **Implementation Strategy**: Development approach, feasibility assessment, risk mitigation
-   - **Solution Optimization**: Performance, security, code quality recommendations
-   - **Critical Success Factors**: Technical requirements, quality metrics, success validation
-   - **Confidence & Recommendations**: Assessment scores, final recommendation with rationale
-
-2. **Report Generation Guidelines**
-   - **Focus**: Solution improvements, key design decisions, critical insights
-   - **Exclude**: Task breakdowns, implementation steps, project planning
-   - **Emphasize**: Architectural rationale, tradeoff analysis, risk assessment
-   - **Structure**: Clear sections with decision justification and feasibility scoring
-
-3. **Final Output**
-   - **Primary Output**: `ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - comprehensive solution design and technical analysis
-   - **Single File Policy**: Only generate ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md, no supplementary files
-   - **Report Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
-   - **Content Focus**: Technical insights, design decisions, optimization strategies
+1. **Report Sections**: Executive Summary, Current State, Solution Design, Implementation Strategy, Optimization, Success Factors, Confidence Scores
+2. **Guidelines**: Focus on solution improvements and design decisions (exclude task planning), emphasize rationale/tradeoffs/risk assessment
+3. **Output**: Single file `ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` at `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/` with technical insights and optimization strategies
 
 ## Analysis Results Format
 
@@ -318,35 +224,22 @@ Generated ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focuses on **solution improvements, key design dec
 ### Code Modification Targets
 **Purpose**: Specific code locations for modification AND new files to create
 
-**Format**:
-- Existing files: `file:function:lines` (with line numbers)
-- New files: `file` (no function or lines)
-
 **Identified Targets**:
 1. **Target**: `src/auth/AuthService.ts:login:45-52`
    - **Type**: Modify existing
    - **Modification**: Enhance error handling
-   - **Rationale**: Current logic lacks validation for edge cases
+   - **Rationale**: Current logic lacks validation
 
 2. **Target**: `src/auth/PasswordReset.ts`
    - **Type**: Create new file
    - **Purpose**: Password reset functionality
    - **Rationale**: New feature requirement
 
-3. **Target**: `src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken:30-45`
-   - **Type**: Modify existing
-   - **Modification**: Add token expiry check
-   - **Rationale**: Security requirement for JWT validation
-
-4. **Target**: `tests/auth/PasswordReset.test.ts`
-   - **Type**: Create new file
-   - **Purpose**: Test coverage for password reset
-   - **Rationale**: Test requirement for new feature
-
-**Note**:
-- For new files, only specify the file path (no function or lines)
-- For existing files without line numbers, use `file:function:*` format
-- Task generation will refine these during the `analyze_task_patterns` step
+**Format Rules**:
+- Existing files: `file:function:lines` (with line numbers)
+- New files: `file` (no function or lines)
+- Unknown lines: `file:function:*`
+- Task generation will refine these targets during `analyze_task_patterns` step
 
 ### Feasibility Assessment
 - **Technical Complexity**: {complexity_rating_and_analysis}
@@ -438,94 +331,46 @@ Generated ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focuses on **solution improvements, key design dec
 - **External Resources**: {external_references_and_best_practices}
 ```
 
-## Error Handling & Fallbacks
+## Execution Management
 
-### Error Handling & Recovery Strategies
+### Error Handling & Recovery
+1. **Pre-execution**: Verify session/context package, confirm CLI tools, validate dependencies
+2. **Monitoring & Timeout**: Track progress, 30-min limit, manage parallel execution, maintain status
+3. **Partial Recovery**: Generate results with incomplete outputs, use logs, provide next steps
+4. **Error Recovery**: Auto error detection, structured workflows, graceful degradation
 
-1. **Pre-execution Validation**
-   - **Session Verification**: Ensure session directory and metadata exist
-   - **Context Package Validation**: Verify JSON format and content structure
-   - **Tool Availability**: Confirm CLI tools are accessible and configured
-   - **Prerequisite Checks**: Validate all required dependencies and permissions
-
-2. **Execution Monitoring & Timeout Management**
-   - **Progress Monitoring**: Track analysis execution with regular status checks
-   - **Timeout Controls**: 30-minute execution limit with graceful termination
-   - **Process Management**: Handle parallel tool execution and resource limits
-   - **Status Tracking**: Maintain real-time execution state and completion status
-
-3. **Partial Results Recovery**
-   - **Fallback Strategy**: Generate analysis results even with incomplete outputs
-   - **Log Integration**: Use execution logs when primary outputs are unavailable
-   - **Recovery Mode**: Create partial analysis reports with available data
-   - **Guidance Generation**: Provide next steps and retry recommendations
-
-4. **Resource Management**
-   - **Disk Space Monitoring**: Check available storage and cleanup temporary files
-   - **Process Limits**: Set CPU and memory constraints for analysis execution
-   - **Performance Optimization**: Manage resource utilization and system load
-   - **Cleanup Procedures**: Remove outdated logs and temporary files
-
-5. **Comprehensive Error Recovery**
-   - **Error Detection**: Automatic error identification and classification
-   - **Recovery Workflows**: Structured approach to handling different failure modes
-   - **Status Reporting**: Clear communication of issues and resolution attempts
-   - **Graceful Degradation**: Provide useful outputs even with partial failures
-
-## Performance Optimization
-
-### Analysis Optimization Strategies
-- **Parallel Analysis**: Execute multiple tools in parallel to reduce total time
+### Performance & Resource Optimization
+- **Parallel Analysis**: Execute multiple tools simultaneously to reduce time
 - **Context Sharding**: Analyze large projects by module shards
-- **Caching Mechanism**: Reuse analysis results for similar contexts
-- **Incremental Analysis**: Perform incremental analysis based on changes
+- **Caching**: Reuse results for similar contexts
+- **Resource Management**: Monitor disk/CPU/memory, set limits, cleanup temporary files
+- **Timeout Control**: `timeout 600s` with partial result generation on failure
 
-### Resource Management
-```bash
-# Set analysis timeout
-timeout 600s analysis_command || {
-  echo "⚠️ Analysis timeout, generating partial results"
-  # Generate partial results
-}
+## Integration & Success Criteria
 
-# Memory usage monitoring
-memory_usage=$(ps -o pid,vsz,rss,comm -p $$)
-if [ "$memory_usage" -gt "$memory_limit" ]; then
-  echo "⚠️ High memory usage detected, optimizing..."
-fi
-```
+### Input/Output Interface
+**Input**:
+- `--session` (required): Session ID (e.g., WFS-auth)
+- `--context` (required): Context package path
+- `--depth` (optional): Analysis depth (quick|full|deep)
+- `--focus` (optional): Analysis focus areas
 
-## Integration Points
+**Output**:
+- Single file: `ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` at `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/`
+- No supplementary files (JSON, roadmap, templates)
 
-### Input Interface
-- **Required**: `--session` parameter specifying session ID (e.g., WFS-auth)
-- **Required**: `--context` parameter specifying context package path
-- **Optional**: `--depth` specify analysis depth (quick|full|deep)
-- **Optional**: `--focus` specify analysis focus areas
+### Quality & Success Validation
+**Quality Checks**: Completeness, consistency, feasibility validation
 
-### Output Interface
-- **Primary**: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md - solution design and technical analysis
-- **Location**: .workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- **Single Output Policy**: Only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md is generated
-- **No Supplementary Files**: No additional JSON, roadmap, or template files
-
-## Quality Assurance
-
-### Analysis Quality Checks
-- **Completeness Check**: Ensure all required analysis sections are completed
-- **Consistency Check**: Verify consistency of multi-tool analysis results
-- **Feasibility Validation**: Ensure recommended implementation plans are feasible
-
-### Success Criteria
-- ✅ **Solution-Focused Analysis**: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md emphasizes solution improvements, design decisions, and critical insights
-- ✅ **Single Output File**: Only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated, no supplementary files
-- ✅ **Design Decision Depth**: Clear rationale for architectural choices with alternatives and tradeoffs
-- ✅ **Feasibility Assessment**: Technical complexity, risk analysis, and implementation readiness evaluation
-- ✅ **Optimization Strategies**: Performance, security, and code quality recommendations
-- ✅ **Parallel Execution**: Efficient concurrent tool execution (Gemini + Codex for complex tasks)
-- ✅ **Robust Error Handling**: Comprehensive validation, timeout management, and partial result recovery
-- ✅ **Confidence Scoring**: Multi-dimensional assessment with clear recommendation status
-- ✅ **No Task Planning**: Exclude task breakdowns, implementation steps, and project planning details
+**Success Criteria**:
+- ✅ Solution-focused analysis (design decisions, critical insights, NO task planning)
+- ✅ Single output file only
+- ✅ Design decision depth with rationale/alternatives/tradeoffs
+- ✅ Feasibility assessment (complexity, risks, readiness)
+- ✅ Optimization strategies (performance, security, quality)
+- ✅ Parallel execution efficiency (Gemini + Codex for complex tasks)
+- ✅ Robust error handling (validation, timeout, partial recovery)
+- ✅ Confidence scoring with clear recommendation status
 
 ## Related Commands
 - `/context:gather` - Generate context packages required by this command

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/context-gather.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: gather
 description: Intelligently collect project context based on task description and package into standardized JSON
-usage: /workflow:tools:context-gather --session <session_id> "<task_description>"
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id \"task description\""
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-user-auth "Implement user authentication system"

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/docs.md

@@ -1,590 +0,0 @@
----
-name: docs
-description: Documentation planning and orchestration - creates structured documentation tasks for execution
-usage: /workflow:docs <type> [options]
-argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all" [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:docs all                          # Complete documentation (gemini default)
-  - /workflow:docs all --tool qwen              # Use Qwen for architecture focus
-  - /workflow:docs architecture --scope src/modules
-  - /workflow:docs api --tool gemini --scope api/
----
-
-# Workflow Documentation Command
-
-## Purpose
-
-**`/workflow:docs` is a lightweight planner/orchestrator** - it analyzes project structure using metadata tools, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. It does **NOT** generate any documentation content itself.
-
-**Key Principle**: Lightweight Planning + Targeted Execution
-- **docs.md** → Collect metadata (paths, structure), generate task JSONs with path references
-- **doc-generator.md** → Execute targeted analysis on focus_paths, generate content
-
-**Optimization Philosophy**:
-- **Planning phase**: Minimal context - only metadata (module paths, file lists via `get_modules_by_depth.sh` and Code Index MCP)
-- **Task JSON**: Store path references, not content
-- **Execution phase**: Targeted deep analysis within focus_paths scope
-
-## Usage
-
-```bash
-/workflow:docs <type> [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
-```
-
-### Parameters
-
-- **type**: `architecture` | `api` | `all` (required)
-  - `architecture`: System design, module interactions, patterns
-  - `api`: Endpoint documentation, API specifications
-  - `all`: Complete documentation suite
-
-- **--tool**: `gemini` | `qwen` | `codex` (optional, default: gemini)
-  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
-  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
-  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
-
-- **--scope**: Directory path filter (optional)
-
-## Planning Workflow
-
-### Complete Execution Flow
-
-```
-/workflow:docs [type] [--tool] [--scope]
-    ↓
-Phase 1: Init Session → Create session dir & active marker
-    ↓
-Phase 2: Module Analysis → Run get_modules_by_depth.sh
-    ↓
-Phase 3: Quick Assess → Check existing docs
-    ↓
-Phase 4: Decompose → Create task list & TodoWrite
-    ↓
-Phase 5: Generate Tasks → Build IMPL-*.json & plans
-    ↓
-✅ Planning Complete → Show TodoWrite status
-```
-
-### Phase Details
-
-#### Phase 1: Session Initialization
-```bash
-# Parse arguments and create session structure
-doc_type="all"  # architecture|api|all
-tool="gemini"   # gemini|qwen|codex (default: gemini)
-scope=""        # optional path filter
-
-timestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
-session_dir=".workflow/WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
-mkdir -p "${session_dir}"/{.task,.process,.summaries}
-touch ".workflow/.active-WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
-```
-
-#### Phase 2: Lightweight Metadata Collection (MANDATORY)
-```bash
-# Step 1: Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for module hierarchy (metadata only)
-module_data=$(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
-# Format: depth:N|path:<PATH>|files:N|size:N|has_claude:yes/no
-
-# Step 2: Use Code Index MCP for file discovery (optional, for better precision)
-# Example: mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="src/**/")
-# This finds directories without loading content
-
-# IMPORTANT: Do NOT read file contents in planning phase
-# Only collect: paths, file counts, module structure
-```
-
-#### Phase 3: Quick Documentation Assessment
-```bash
-# Lightweight check - no heavy analysis
-existing_docs=$(find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.md" -not -path "./.workflow/*" | wc -l)
-
-if [[ $existing_docs -gt 5 ]]; then
-    find . -maxdepth 3 -name "*.md" > "${session_dir}/.process/existing-docs.txt"
-fi
-
-# Record strategy
-cat > "${session_dir}/.process/strategy.md" <<EOF
-**Type**: ${doc_type}
-**Tool**: ${tool}
-**Scope**: ${scope:-"Full project"}
-EOF
-```
-
-#### Phase 4: Task Decomposition & TodoWrite Setup
-
-**Decomposition Strategy**:
-1. **Always create**: System Overview task (IMPL-001)
-2. **If architecture/all**: Architecture Documentation task
-3. **If api/all**: Unified API Documentation task
-4. **For each module**: Module Documentation task (grouped)
-
-**Grouping Rules**:
-- Max 3 modules per task
-- Max 30 files per task
-- Group by dependency depth and functional similarity
-
-**TodoWrite Setup**:
-```
-✅ Session initialization (completed)
-⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
-⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
-⏳ IMPL-003: Module 'api' (pending)
-⏳ IMPL-004: Architecture Documentation (pending)
-⏳ IMPL-005: API Documentation (pending)
-```
-
-#### Phase 5: Task JSON Generation
-
-Each task follows the 5-field schema with detailed flow_control.
-
-**Command Generation Logic**:
-```bash
-# Build tool-specific command at planning time
-if [[ "$tool" == "codex" ]]; then
-    cmd="codex -C ${dir} --full-auto exec \"...\""
-else
-    cmd="bash(cd ${dir} && ~/.claude/scripts/${tool}-wrapper -p \"...\")"
-fi
-```
-
-## Task Templates
-
-### 1. System Overview (IMPL-001)
-**Purpose**: Project-level documentation
-**Output**: `.workflow/docs/README.md`
-
-**Complete JSON Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Generate Project Overview Documentation",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "template": "project-overview"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Document project purpose, architecture, and getting started guide",
-      "Create navigation structure for all documentation",
-      "Use Project-Level Documentation Template"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["."],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "Complete .workflow/docs/README.md following template",
-      "All template sections populated with accurate information",
-      "Navigation links to module and API documentation"
-    ],
-    "scope": "Project root and overall structure"
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "discover_project_structure",
-        "action": "Get project module hierarchy metadata",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
-        "output_to": "system_structure",
-        "on_error": "fail",
-        "note": "Lightweight metadata only - no file content"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_tech_stack",
-        "action": "Analyze technology stack from key config files",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project technology stack\\nTASK: Extract tech stack from key config files\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{package.json,pom.xml,build.gradle,requirements.txt,go.mod,Cargo.toml,CLAUDE.md}\\nEXPECTED: Technology list and architecture style\\nRULES: Be concise, focus on stack only\")",
-        "output_to": "tech_stack_analysis",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional",
-        "note": "Only analyze config files - small, controlled context"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Use system_structure and tech_stack_analysis to populate Project Overview Template",
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt",
-        "Fill sections using [system_structure] and [tech_stack_analysis]",
-        "Generate navigation links based on module paths",
-        "Format output as Markdown"
-      ]
-    },
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 2. Module Documentation (IMPL-002+)
-**Purpose**: Module-level documentation
-**Output**: `.workflow/docs/modules/[name]/README.md`
-
-**Complete JSON Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-002",
-  "title": "Document Module: 'auth'",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "template": "module-documentation"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Document module purpose, internal architecture, public API",
-      "Include dependencies and usage examples",
-      "Use Module-Level Documentation Template"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "Complete .workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md",
-      "All exported functions/classes documented",
-      "Working code examples included"
-    ],
-    "scope": "auth module only"
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_module_content",
-        "action": "Perform deep analysis of the specific module's content",
-        "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document 'auth' module comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}\\nEXPECTED: Structured analysis of module content\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
-        "output_to": "module_analysis",
-        "on_error": "fail",
-        "note": "Analysis strictly limited to focus_paths ('src/auth') - controlled context"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Use the detailed [module_analysis] to populate the Module-Level Documentation Template",
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt",
-        "Fill sections using [module_analysis]",
-        "Generate code examples from actual usage",
-        "Format output as Markdown"
-      ]
-    },
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 3. Architecture Documentation (if requested)
-**Purpose**: System design and patterns
-**Output**: `.workflow/docs/architecture/`
-
-**Complete JSON Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-N-1",
-  "title": "Generate Architecture Documentation",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "qwen",
-    "template": "architecture"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Document system design patterns and architectural decisions",
-      "Create module interaction diagrams",
-      "Explain data flow and component relationships"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["."],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "Complete architecture documentation in .workflow/docs/architecture/",
-      "Diagrams explaining system design",
-      "Clear explanation of architectural patterns"
-    ]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_all_module_docs",
-        "action": "Aggregate all module documentation",
-        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/modules -name 'README.md' -exec cat {} \\;)",
-        "output_to": "module_docs",
-        "on_error": "fail"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_architecture",
-        "action": "Synthesize system architecture from modules",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Synthesize system architecture\\nTASK: Create architecture documentation from module docs\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture documentation with patterns\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt) | Focus on design patterns, data flow, component interactions\")",
-        "output_to": "architecture_analysis",
-        "on_error": "fail",
-        "note": "Command varies: gemini-wrapper (default) | qwen-wrapper | codex exec"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Create architecture documentation from synthesis",
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Parse architecture_analysis for patterns and design decisions",
-        "Create text-based diagrams (mermaid/ASCII) for module interactions",
-        "Document data flow between components",
-        "Explain architectural decisions and trade-offs",
-        "Format as structured documentation"
-      ]
-    },
-    "target_files": [
-      ".workflow/docs/architecture/system-design.md",
-      ".workflow/docs/architecture/module-map.md",
-      ".workflow/docs/architecture/data-flow.md"
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 4. API Documentation (if requested)
-**Purpose**: API reference and specifications
-**Output**: `.workflow/docs/api/README.md`
-
-**Complete JSON Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-N",
-  "title": "Generate Unified API Documentation",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "template": "api-reference"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Document all API endpoints with request/response formats",
-      "Include authentication and error handling",
-      "Generate OpenAPI specification if applicable",
-      "Use API-Level Documentation Template"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/api", "src/routes", "src/controllers"],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "Complete .workflow/docs/api/README.md following template",
-      "All endpoints documented with examples",
-      "OpenAPI spec generated if REST API detected"
-    ]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "discover_api_endpoints",
-        "action": "Find all API routes and endpoints using MCP",
-        "command": "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern='router\\.|app\\.|@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch)', file_pattern='*.{ts,js}', output_mode='content', head_limit=100)",
-        "output_to": "endpoint_discovery",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional",
-        "note": "Use MCP instead of rg for better structure"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_api_structure",
-        "action": "Analyze API structure and patterns",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document API comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract endpoints, auth, request/response formats\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*,src/routes/**/*,src/controllers/**/*}\\nEXPECTED: Complete API documentation\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt)\")",
-        "output_to": "api_analysis",
-        "on_error": "fail",
-        "note": "Analysis limited to API-related paths - controlled context"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Use api_analysis to populate API-Level Documentation Template",
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt",
-        "Parse api_analysis for: endpoints, auth, request/response",
-        "Fill template sections with extracted information",
-        "Generate OpenAPI spec if REST API detected",
-        "Format output as Markdown"
-      ]
-    },
-    "target_files": [
-      ".workflow/docs/api/README.md",
-      ".workflow/docs/api/openapi.yaml"
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-## Planning Outputs
-
-### File Structure
-```
-.workflow/
-├── .active-WFS-docs-20240120-143022
-└── WFS-docs-20240120-143022/
-    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Implementation plan
-    ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracker
-    ├── .process/
-    │   ├── strategy.md           # Doc strategy
-    │   └── existing-docs.txt     # Existing docs list
-    └── .task/
-        ├── IMPL-001.json         # System overview
-        ├── IMPL-002.json         # Module: auth
-        ├── IMPL-003.json         # Module: api
-        ├── IMPL-004.json         # Architecture
-        └── IMPL-005.json         # API docs
-```
-
-### IMPL_PLAN.md
-```markdown
-# Documentation Implementation Plan
-
-**Session**: WFS-docs-[timestamp]
-**Type**: [architecture|api|all]
-**Tool**: [gemini|qwen|codex]
-
-## Task Breakdown
-
-### IMPL-001: System Overview
-- **Output**: .workflow/docs/README.md
-- **Template**: project-overview.txt
-
-### IMPL-002+: Module Documentation
-- **Modules**: [list]
-- **Template**: module-documentation.txt
-
-### IMPL-N: Architecture/API (if requested)
-- **Template**: architecture.txt / api-reference.txt
-
-## Execution Order
-1. IMPL-001 (Foundation)
-2. IMPL-002 to IMPL-[M] (Modules - can parallelize)
-3. IMPL-[M+1] (Architecture - needs modules)
-4. IMPL-[N] (API - can run after IMPL-001)
-```
-
-### TODO_LIST.md
-```markdown
-# Documentation Progress Tracker
-
-- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Generate Project Overview
-- [ ] **IMPL-002**: Document Module: 'auth'
-- [ ] **IMPL-003**: Document Module: 'api'
-- [ ] **IMPL-004**: Generate Architecture Documentation
-- [ ] **IMPL-005**: Generate Unified API Documentation
-
-## Execution
-```bash
-/workflow:execute IMPL-001
-/workflow:execute IMPL-002
-# ...
-```
-```
-
-## Execution Phase
-
-### Via /workflow:execute
-
-```
-For Each Task (IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...):
-
-/workflow:execute IMPL-NNN
-    ↓
-TodoWrite: pending → in_progress
-    ↓
-Execute flow_control (pre_analysis steps)
-    ↓
-Generate Documentation (apply template)
-    ↓
-TodoWrite: in_progress → completed
-    ↓
-✅ Task Complete
-```
-
-### TodoWrite Status Tracking
-
-**Planning Phase**:
-```
-✅ Session initialization (completed)
-⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
-⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
-```
-
-**Execution Phase**:
-```
-Executing IMPL-001:
-✅ Session initialization
-🔄 IMPL-001: Project Overview (in_progress)
-⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth'
-
-After IMPL-001:
-✅ Session initialization
-✅ IMPL-001: Project Overview (completed)
-🔄 IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (in_progress)
-```
-
-## Documentation Output
-
-### Final Structure
-```
-.workflow/docs/
-├── README.md                     # IMPL-001: Project overview
-├── modules/
-│   ├── auth/README.md           # IMPL-002: Auth module
-│   └── api/README.md            # IMPL-003: API module
-├── architecture/                # IMPL-004: Architecture
-│   ├── system-design.md
-│   ├── module-map.md
-│   └── data-flow.md
-└── api/                         # IMPL-005: API docs
-    ├── README.md
-    └── openapi.yaml
-```
-
-## Next Steps
-
-### 1. Review Planning Output
-```bash
-cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL_PLAN.md
-cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/TODO_LIST.md
-```
-
-### 2. Execute Documentation Tasks
-```bash
-# Sequential (recommended)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-001  # System overview first
-/workflow:execute IMPL-002  # Module docs
-/workflow:execute IMPL-003
-/workflow:execute IMPL-004  # Architecture
-/workflow:execute IMPL-005  # API docs
-
-# Parallel (module docs only)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-002 &
-/workflow:execute IMPL-003 &
-wait
-```
-
-### 3. Review Generated Documentation
-```bash
-ls -lah .workflow/docs/
-cat .workflow/docs/README.md
-```
-
-### 4. TodoWrite Progress
-- Planning: All tasks `pending`
-- Execution: `pending` → `in_progress` → `completed`
-- Real-time status updates via TodoWrite
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **No modules found**: Create only IMPL-001 (system overview)
-- **Scope path invalid**: Show error and exit
-- **Active session exists**: Prompt to complete or pause
-- **Tool unavailable**: Fall back to gemini
-
-## Key Benefits
-
-### Clear Separation of Concerns
-- **Planning**: Session creation, task decomposition (this command)
-- **Execution**: Content generation, quality assurance (doc-generator agent)
-
-### Scalable Task Management
-- Independent, self-contained tasks
-- Parallelizable module documentation
-- Clear dependencies (architecture needs modules)
-
-### Template-Driven Consistency
-- All documentation follows standard templates
-- Reusable and maintainable
-- Easy to update standards
-
-### Full Context for Execution
-- Each task JSON contains complete instructions
-- flow_control defines exact analysis steps
-- Tool selection for flexibility

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-agent.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: task-generate-agent
 description: Autonomous task generation using action-planning-agent with discovery and output phases
-usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session <session_id>
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
@@ -216,17 +215,29 @@ Task(
         "on_error": "fail"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
-      "modification_points": ["Apply requirements from synthesis"],
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load synthesis specification",
-        "Analyze existing patterns",
-        "Implement following specification",
-        "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
-        "Validate against acceptance criteria"
-      ]
-    },
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Implement task following synthesis specification",
+        "description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
+          "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
+          "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
+          "Integrate with existing patterns"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load synthesis specification and relevant role artifacts",
+          "Execute MCP code-index discovery for relevant files",
+          "Analyze existing patterns and identify modification targets",
+          "Implement following specification",
+          "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
+          "Validate against acceptance criteria"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "implementation"
+      }
+    ],
     "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
   }
 }

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-tdd.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: task-generate-tdd
 description: Generate TDD task chains with Red-Green-Refactor dependencies
-usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session <session_id> [--agent]
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--agent]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth --agent
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*), TodoWrite(*)
 ---
 
@@ -178,51 +174,53 @@ For each feature, generate 3 tasks with ID format:
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Write minimal code to pass tests, then enter iterative fix cycle if they still fail",
-      "initial_implementation": [
-        "Write minimal code based on test requirements",
-        "Execute test suite: bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
-        "If tests pass → Complete task",
-        "If tests fail → Capture failure logs and proceed to test-fix cycle"
-      ],
-      "test_fix_cycle": {
-        "max_iterations": 3,
-        "cycle_pattern": "gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if meta.use_codex=true) → retest",
-        "tools": {
-          "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
-          "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex if meta.use_codex=true",
-          "verification": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)"
-        },
-        "exit_conditions": {
-          "success": "all_tests_pass",
-          "failure": "max_iterations_reached"
-        },
-        "steps": [
-          "ITERATION LOOP (max 3):",
-          "  1. Gemini Diagnosis:",
-          "     bash(cd .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p \"",
-          "     PURPOSE: Diagnose TDD Green phase test failure iteration [N]",
-          "     TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations",
-          "     MODE: analysis",
-          "     CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}",
-          "              Test output: [test_failures]",
-          "              Test requirements: [test_requirements]",
-          "              Implementation: [focus_paths]",
-          "     EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes",
-          "     RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [test_failure_description]",
-          "            Minimal surgical fixes only - stay in Green phase",
-          "     \" > green-fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md)",
-          "  2. Apply Fix (check meta.use_codex):",
-          "     IF meta.use_codex=false (default): Present diagnosis to user for manual fix",
-          "     IF meta.use_codex=true: Codex applies fix automatically",
-          "  3. Retest: bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
-          "  4. If pass → Exit loop, complete task",
-          "     If fail → Continue to next iteration",
-          "IF max_iterations reached: Revert changes, report failure"
-        ]
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Implement minimal code to pass tests",
+        "description": "Write minimal code based on test requirements following TDD principles - no over-engineering",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Load test requirements from TEST phase",
+          "Create/modify implementation files",
+          "Implement only what tests require",
+          "Focus on passing tests, not perfection"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load test requirements from [test_requirements]",
+          "Parse test expectations and edge cases",
+          "Write minimal implementation code",
+          "Avoid premature optimization or abstraction"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "initial_implementation"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": 2,
+        "title": "Test and iteratively fix until passing",
+        "description": "Run tests and enter iterative fix cycle if needed (max 3 iterations with auto-revert on failure)",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Execute test suite",
+          "If tests fail: diagnose with Gemini",
+          "Apply fixes (manual or Codex if meta.use_codex=true)",
+          "Retest and iterate"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Run test suite",
+          "If all tests pass → Complete",
+          "If tests fail → Enter iteration loop (max 3):",
+          "  Extract failure messages and stack traces",
+          "  Use Gemini bug-fix template for diagnosis",
+          "  Generate targeted fix recommendations",
+          "  Apply fixes (manual or Codex)",
+          "  Rerun tests",
+          "  If pass → Complete, if fail → Continue iteration",
+          "If max_iterations reached → Trigger auto-revert"
+        ],
+        "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+        "depends_on": [1],
+        "output": "test_results"
       }
-    },
+    ],
     "post_completion": [
       {
         "step": "verify_tests_passing",

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate.md

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 ---
 name: task-generate
 description: Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with artifacts integration
-usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate --session <session_id>
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--cli-execute]"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
 ---
 
 # Task Generation Command
@@ -12,12 +12,30 @@ examples:
 ## Overview
 Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic artifact detection and integration.
 
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Agent Mode (Default)
+Tasks execute within agent context using agent's capabilities:
+- Agent reads synthesis specifications
+- Agent implements following requirements
+- Agent validates implementation
+- **Benefit**: Seamless context within single agent execution
+
+### CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`)
+Tasks execute using Codex CLI with resume mechanism:
+- Each task uses `codex exec` command in `implementation_approach`
+- First task establishes Codex session
+- Subsequent tasks use `codex exec "..." resume --last` for context continuity
+- **Benefit**: Codex's autonomous development capabilities with persistent context
+- **Use Case**: Complex implementation requiring Codex's reasoning and iteration
+
 ## Core Philosophy
 - **Analysis-Driven**: Generate from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
 - **Artifact-Aware**: Auto-detect brainstorming outputs
 - **Context-Rich**: Embed comprehensive context in task JSON
 - **Flow-Control Ready**: Pre-define implementation steps
 - **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from memory
+- **CLI-Aware**: Support Codex resume mechanism for persistent context
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 - Parse analysis results and extract tasks
@@ -154,23 +172,52 @@ Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic a
         "on_error": "fail"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
-      "modification_points": [
-        "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
-        "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
-        "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
-        "Integrate with existing patterns"
-      ],
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load synthesis specification",
-        "Extract requirements and design",
-        "Analyze existing patterns",
-        "Implement following specification",
-        "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
-        "Validate against acceptance criteria"
-      ]
-    },
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Implement task following synthesis specification",
+        "description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
+          "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
+          "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
+          "Integrate with existing patterns"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load synthesis specification",
+          "Extract requirements and design",
+          "Analyze existing patterns",
+          "Implement following specification",
+          "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
+          "Validate against acceptance criteria"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "implementation"
+      }
+    ],
+
+    // CLI Execute Mode: Use Codex command (when --cli-execute flag present)
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
+        "description": "Use Codex CLI to implement '[title]' following synthesis specification with autonomous development capabilities",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Codex loads synthesis specification and artifacts",
+          "Codex implements following requirements",
+          "Codex validates and tests implementation"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Establish or resume Codex session",
+          "Pass synthesis specification to Codex",
+          "Codex performs autonomous implementation",
+          "Codex validates against acceptance criteria"
+        ],
+        "command": "bash(codex -C [focus_paths] --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: [title] TASK: [requirements] MODE: auto CONTEXT: @{[synthesis_path],[artifacts_paths]} EXPECTED: [acceptance] RULES: Follow synthesis-specification.md\" [resume_flag] --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "implementation"
+      }
+    ],
     "target_files": ["file:function:lines"]
   }
 }
@@ -182,7 +229,37 @@ Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic a
 3. Generate task context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance)
 4. **Determine modification targets**: Extract specific code locations from analysis
 5. Build flow_control with artifact loading steps and target_files
-6. Create individual task JSON files in `.task/`
+6. **CLI Execute Mode**: If `--cli-execute` flag present, generate Codex commands
+7. Create individual task JSON files in `.task/`
+
+#### Codex Resume Mechanism (CLI Execute Mode)
+
+**Session Continuity Strategy**:
+- **First Task** (no depends_on or depends_on=[]): Establish new Codex session
+  - Command: `codex -C [path] --full-auto exec "[prompt]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+  - Creates new session context
+
+- **Subsequent Tasks** (has depends_on): Resume previous Codex session
+  - Command: `codex --full-auto exec "[prompt]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+  - Maintains context from previous implementation
+  - **Critical**: `resume --last` flag enables context continuity
+
+**Resume Flag Logic**:
+```javascript
+// Determine resume flag based on task dependencies
+const resumeFlag = task.context.depends_on && task.context.depends_on.length > 0
+  ? "resume --last"
+  : "";
+
+// First task (IMPL-001): no resume flag
+// Later tasks (IMPL-002, IMPL-003): use "resume --last"
+```
+
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Shared context across related tasks
+- ✅ Codex learns from previous implementations
+- ✅ Consistent patterns and conventions
+- ✅ Reduced redundant analysis
 
 #### Target Files Generation (Critical)
 **Purpose**: Identify specific code locations for modification AND new files to create
@@ -543,8 +620,82 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
 ```
 
+## CLI Execute Mode Examples
+
+### Example 1: First Task (Establish Session)
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Implement user authentication module",
+  "context": {
+    "depends_on": [],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
+    "requirements": ["JWT-based authentication", "Login and registration endpoints"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "implementation_approach": [{
+      "step": 1,
+      "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
+      "command": "bash(codex -C src/auth --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Implement user authentication module TASK: JWT-based authentication with login and registration MODE: auto CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md} EXPECTED: Complete auth module with tests RULES: Follow synthesis specification\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
+      "depends_on": [],
+      "output": "implementation"
+    }]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Example 2: Subsequent Task (Resume Session)
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-002",
+  "title": "Add password reset functionality",
+  "context": {
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001"],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
+    "requirements": ["Password reset via email", "Token validation"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "implementation_approach": [{
+      "step": 1,
+      "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
+      "command": "bash(codex --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Add password reset functionality TASK: Password reset via email with token validation MODE: auto CONTEXT: Previous auth implementation from session EXPECTED: Password reset endpoints with email integration RULES: Maintain consistency with existing auth patterns\" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
+      "depends_on": [],
+      "output": "implementation"
+    }]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Example 3: Third Task (Continue Session)
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-003",
+  "title": "Implement role-based access control",
+  "context": {
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-002"],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
+    "requirements": ["User roles and permissions", "Middleware for route protection"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "implementation_approach": [{
+      "step": 1,
+      "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
+      "command": "bash(codex --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Implement role-based access control TASK: User roles, permissions, and route protection middleware MODE: auto CONTEXT: Existing auth system from session EXPECTED: RBAC system integrated with current auth RULES: Use established patterns from session context\" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
+      "depends_on": [],
+      "output": "implementation"
+    }]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Pattern Summary**:
+- IMPL-001: Fresh start with `-C src/auth` and full prompt
+- IMPL-002: Resume with `resume --last`, references "previous auth implementation"
+- IMPL-003: Resume with `resume --last`, references "existing auth system"
+
 ## Related Commands
 - `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates entire planning
+- `/workflow:plan --cli-execute` - Planning with CLI execution mode
 - `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package
 - `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides analysis results
 - `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/tdd-coverage-analysis.md

@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-coverage-analysis
 description: Analyze test coverage and TDD cycle execution
-usage: /workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis --session <session_id>
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis --session WFS-auth
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-concept-enhanced.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: test-concept-enhanced
 description: Analyze test requirements and generate test generation strategy using Gemini
-usage: /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session <test_session_id> --context <test_context_package_path>
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id --context path/to/test-context-package.json"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session WFS-test-auth --context .workflow/WFS-test-auth/.process/test-context-package.json

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-context-gather.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: test-context-gather
 description: Collect test coverage context and identify files requiring test generation
-usage: /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session <test_session_id>
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-auth

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md

@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 ---
 name: test-task-generate
 description: Generate test-fix task JSON with iterative test-fix-retest cycle specification
-usage: /workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session <test-session-id>
-argument-hint: "[--use-codex] --session WFS-test-session-id"
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session WFS-test-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
   - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --session WFS-test-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
 ---
 
 # Test Task Generation Command
@@ -13,6 +14,16 @@ examples:
 ## Overview
 Generate specialized test-fix task JSON with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle specification, including Gemini diagnosis (using bug-fix template) and manual fix workflow (Codex automation only when explicitly requested).
 
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Test Generation (IMPL-001)
+- **Agent Mode (Default)**: @code-developer generates tests within agent context
+- **CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`)**: Use Codex CLI for autonomous test generation
+
+### Test Fix (IMPL-002)
+- **Manual Mode (Default)**: Gemini diagnosis → user applies fixes
+- **Codex Mode (`--use-codex`)**: Gemini diagnosis → Codex applies fixes with resume mechanism
+
 ## Core Philosophy
 - **Analysis-Driven Test Generation**: Use TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
 - **Agent-Based Test Creation**: Call @code-developer agent for comprehensive test generation
@@ -38,8 +49,9 @@ Generate specialized test-fix task JSON with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle
 ### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
 
 1. **Parameter Parsing**
-   - Parse `--use-codex` flag from command arguments
-   - Store flag value for IMPL-002.json generation
+   - Parse `--use-codex` flag from command arguments → Controls IMPL-002 fix mode
+   - Parse `--cli-execute` flag from command arguments → Controls IMPL-001 generation mode
+   - Store flag values for task JSON generation
 
 2. **Test Session Validation**
    - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json`
@@ -143,31 +155,53 @@ Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md. Follow test generation strategy and create all test files listed in section 5 (Implementation Targets).",
-      "generation_steps": [
-        "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 3 (Test Requirements by File)",
-        "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 4 (Test Generation Strategy)",
-        "Study existing test patterns from test_context.test_framework.conventions",
-        "For each test file in section 5 (Implementation Targets):",
-        "  - Create test file with specified scenarios",
-        "  - Implement happy path tests",
-        "  - Implement error handling tests",
-        "  - Implement edge case tests",
-        "  - Implement integration tests (if specified)",
-        "  - Add required mocks and fixtures",
-        "Follow test framework conventions and project standards",
-        "Ensure all tests are executable and syntactically valid"
+    // Agent Mode (Default): Agent implements tests
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate comprehensive test suite",
+        "description": "Generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md. Follow test generation strategy and create all test files listed in section 5 (Implementation Targets).",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md sections 3 and 4",
+          "Study existing test patterns",
+          "Create test files with all required scenarios",
+          "Implement happy path, error handling, edge case, and integration tests",
+          "Add required mocks and fixtures"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 3 (Test Requirements by File)",
+          "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 4 (Test Generation Strategy)",
+          "Study existing test patterns from test_context.test_framework.conventions",
+          "For each test file in section 5 (Implementation Targets): Create test file with specified scenarios, Implement happy path tests, Implement error handling tests, Implement edge case tests, Implement integration tests (if specified), Add required mocks and fixtures",
+          "Follow test framework conventions and project standards",
+          "Ensure all tests are executable and syntactically valid"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "test_suite"
+      }
+    ],
+
+    // CLI Execute Mode (--cli-execute): Use Codex command (alternative format shown below)
+    "implementation_approach": [{
+      "step": 1,
+      "title": "Generate tests using Codex",
+      "description": "Use Codex CLI to autonomously generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+      "modification_points": [
+        "Codex loads TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and existing test patterns",
+        "Codex generates all test files listed in analysis section 5",
+        "Codex ensures tests follow framework conventions"
       ],
-      "quality_criteria": [
-        "All test scenarios from analysis are implemented",
-        "Test structure matches existing patterns",
-        "Clear test descriptions and assertions",
-        "Proper setup/teardown and fixtures",
-        "Dependencies properly mocked",
-        "Tests follow project coding standards"
-      ]
-    },
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Start new Codex session",
+        "Pass TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md to Codex",
+        "Codex studies existing test patterns",
+        "Codex generates comprehensive test suite",
+        "Codex validates test syntax and executability"
+      ],
+      "command": "bash(codex -C [focus_paths] --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive test suite TASK: Create test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5 MODE: write CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md,.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process/test-context-package.json} EXPECTED: All test files with happy path, error handling, edge cases, integration tests RULES: Follow test framework conventions, ensure tests are executable\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
+      "depends_on": [],
+      "output": "test_generation"
+    }],
     "target_files": [
       "{test_file_1 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
       "{test_file_2 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
@@ -279,24 +313,27 @@ Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
       }
     ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle using Gemini diagnosis (bug-fix template) and manual fixes (Codex only if explicitly needed)",
-      "test_fix_cycle": {
-        "max_iterations": 5,
-        "cycle_pattern": "test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if needed) → retest",
-        "tools": {
-          "test_execution": "bash(test_command)",
-          "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
-          "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex exec resume --last (if explicitly needed)",
-          "verification": "bash(test_command) + regression_check"
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle",
+        "description": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle using Gemini diagnosis (bug-fix template) and manual fixes (Codex only if meta.use_codex=true). Max 5 iterations with automatic revert on failure.",
+        "test_fix_cycle": {
+          "max_iterations": 5,
+          "cycle_pattern": "test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if needed) → retest",
+          "tools": {
+            "test_execution": "bash(test_command)",
+            "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
+            "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex exec resume --last (if explicitly needed)",
+            "verification": "bash(test_command) + regression_check"
+          },
+          "exit_conditions": {
+            "success": "all_tests_pass",
+            "failure": "max_iterations_reached",
+            "error": "test_command_not_found"
+          }
         },
-        "exit_conditions": {
-          "success": "all_tests_pass",
-          "failure": "max_iterations_reached",
-          "error": "test_command_not_found"
-        }
-      },
-      "modification_points": [
+        "modification_points": [
         "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
         "  1.1. Discover test command from framework detection",
         "  1.2. Execute initial test run: bash([test_command])",
@@ -428,33 +465,36 @@ Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
         "  Generate summary (include test generation info)",
         "  Certify code APPROVED"
       ],
-      "error_handling": {
-        "max_iterations_reached": {
-          "action": "revert_all_changes",
-          "commands": [
-            "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
-            "bash(jq '.status = \"blocked\"' .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json > temp.json && mv temp.json .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json)"
-          ],
-          "report": "Generate failure report with iteration logs in .summaries/IMPL-001-failure-report.md"
+        "error_handling": {
+          "max_iterations_reached": {
+            "action": "revert_all_changes",
+            "commands": [
+              "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
+              "bash(jq '.status = \"blocked\"' .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json > temp.json && mv temp.json .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json)"
+            ],
+            "report": "Generate failure report with iteration logs in .summaries/IMPL-001-failure-report.md"
+          },
+          "test_command_fails": {
+            "action": "treat_as_test_failure",
+            "context": "Use stderr as failure context for Gemini diagnosis"
+          },
+          "codex_apply_fails": {
+            "action": "retry_once_then_skip",
+            "fallback": "Mark iteration as skipped, continue to next"
+          },
+          "gemini_diagnosis_fails": {
+            "action": "retry_with_simplified_context",
+            "fallback": "Use previous diagnosis, continue"
+          },
+          "regression_detected": {
+            "action": "log_warning_continue",
+            "context": "Include regression info in next Gemini diagnosis"
+          }
         },
-        "test_command_fails": {
-          "action": "treat_as_test_failure",
-          "context": "Use stderr as failure context for Gemini diagnosis"
-        },
-        "codex_apply_fails": {
-          "action": "retry_once_then_skip",
-          "fallback": "Mark iteration as skipped, continue to next"
-        },
-        "gemini_diagnosis_fails": {
-          "action": "retry_with_simplified_context",
-          "fallback": "Use previous diagnosis, continue"
-        },
-        "regression_detected": {
-          "action": "log_warning_continue",
-          "context": "Include regression info in next Gemini diagnosis"
-        }
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "test_fix_results"
       }
-    },
+    ],
     "target_files": [
       "Auto-discovered from test failures",
       "Extracted from Gemini diagnosis each iteration",

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/batch-generate.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: batch-generate
 description: Prompt-driven batch UI generation using target-style-centric parallel execution
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:batch-generate --prompt "<description>" [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--device-type "desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive"] [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:batch-generate --prompt "Dashboard with metrics cards" --style-variants 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:batch-generate --prompt "Auth pages: login, signup" --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:ui-design:batch-generate --prompt "Navbar, hero, footer components" --target-type component
-  - /workflow:ui-design:batch-generate --prompt "Mobile e-commerce app" --device-type mobile
+argument-hint: [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--device-type "desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive"] [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*), mcp__exa__web_search_exa(*)
 ---
 
@@ -52,48 +47,49 @@ ELSE:
     bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" -printf "%T@ %p\n" | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
 
 # Get variant counts
-style_variants = --style-variants OR bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
+style_variants = --style-variants OR bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 layout_variants = --layout-variants OR 3
 ```
 
 **Output**: `base_path`, `target_list[]`, `target_type`, `device_type`, `style_variants`, `layout_variants`
 
-### Step 2: Detect Token Sources
+### Step 2: Validate Design Tokens
 ```bash
-# Check consolidated (priority 1) or proposed (priority 2)
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "consolidated")
-# OR
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "proposed")
+# Check design tokens exist
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
 
-# If proposed: Create temp consolidation dirs + write tokens
-FOR style_id IN 1..style_variants:
-    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id})
-    Write({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json, proposed_tokens)
-
-# Load design space analysis (optional)
-IF exists({base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json):
-    design_space_analysis = Read({base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json)
+# Load design space analysis (optional, from intermediates)
+IF exists({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/design-space-analysis.json):
+    design_space_analysis = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/design-space-analysis.json)
 ```
 
-**Output**: `token_sources{}`, `consolidated_count`, `proposed_count`, `design_space_analysis`
+**Output**: `design_tokens_valid`, `design_space_analysis`
 
-### Step 3: Gather Layout Inspiration
+### Step 3: Gather Layout Inspiration (Reuse or Create)
 ```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations)
+# Check if layout inspirations already exist from layout-extract phase
+inspiration_source = "{base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations"
 
-# For each target: Research via MCP
 FOR target IN target_list:
-    search_query = "{target} {target_type} layout patterns variations"
-    mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query=search_query, numResults=5)
+    # Priority 1: Reuse existing inspiration from layout-extract
+    IF exists({inspiration_source}/{target}-layout-ideas.txt):
+        # Reuse existing inspiration (no action needed)
+        REPORT: "Using existing layout inspiration for {target}"
+    ELSE:
+        # Priority 2: Generate new inspiration via MCP
+        bash(mkdir -p {inspiration_source})
+        search_query = "{target} {target_type} layout patterns variations"
+        mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query=search_query, numResults=5)
 
-    # Extract context from prompt for this target
-    target_requirements = extract_relevant_context_from_prompt(prompt_text, target)
+        # Extract context from prompt for this target
+        target_requirements = extract_relevant_context_from_prompt(prompt_text, target)
 
-    # Write simple inspiration file
-    Write({base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, inspiration_content)
+        # Write inspiration file to centralized location
+        Write({inspiration_source}/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, inspiration_content)
+        REPORT: "Created new layout inspiration for {target}"
 ```
 
-**Output**: `T` inspiration text files
+**Output**: `T` inspiration text files (reused or created in `.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/`)
 
 ## Phase 2: Target-Style-Centric Batch Generation (Agent)
 
@@ -131,8 +127,8 @@ Task(ui-design-agent): `
   ${design_attributes ? "DESIGN_ATTRIBUTES: " + JSON.stringify(design_attributes) : ""}
 
   ## Reference
-  - Layout inspiration: Read("{base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt")
-  - Design tokens: Read("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
+  - Layout inspiration: Read("{base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt")
+  - Design tokens: Read("{base_path}/style-extraction/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
     Parse ALL token values (colors, typography, spacing, borders, shadows, breakpoints)
   ${design_attributes ? "- Adapt DOM to: density, visual_weight, formality, organic_vs_geometric" : ""}
 
@@ -247,18 +243,19 @@ Quality:
 - Style-aware: {design_space_analysis ? 'HTML adapts to design_attributes' : 'Standard structure'}
 - CSS: Self-contained (direct token values, no var())
 - Device-optimized: {device_type} layouts
-- Tokens: {consolidated_count} consolidated, {proposed_count} proposed
-{IF proposed_count > 0: '  💡 For production: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate'}
+- Tokens: Production-ready (WCAG AA compliant)
 
 Generated Files:
 {base_path}/prototypes/
-├── _inspirations/ ({T} text files)
 ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html ({S×L×T} prototypes)
 ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.css
 ├── compare.html (interactive matrix)
 ├── index.html (navigation)
 └── PREVIEW.md (instructions)
 
+Layout Inspirations:
+{base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/ ({T} text files, reused or created)
+
 Preview:
 1. Open compare.html (recommended)
 2. Open index.html
@@ -275,11 +272,10 @@ Next: /workflow:ui-design:update
 bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" -printf "%T@ %p\n" | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
 
 # Count style variants
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 
-# Check token sources
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "consolidated")
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "proposed")
+# Check design tokens exist
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
 ```
 
 ### Validation Commands
@@ -293,8 +289,11 @@ bash(test -f {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html && echo "exists")
 
 ### File Operations
 ```bash
-# Create directories
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations)
+# Create prototypes directory
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes)
+
+# Create inspirations directory (if needed)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations)
 
 # Run preview script
 bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
@@ -304,15 +303,17 @@ bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
 
 ```
 {base_path}/
+├── .intermediates/
+│   └── layout-analysis/
+│       └── inspirations/
+│           └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt  # Layout inspiration (reused or created)
 ├── prototypes/
-│   ├── _inspirations/
-│   │   └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt  # Layout inspiration
 │   ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html  # Final prototypes
 │   ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.css
 │   ├── compare.html
 │   ├── index.html
 │   └── PREVIEW.md
-└── style-consolidation/
+└── style-extraction/
     └── style-{s}/
         ├── design-tokens.json
         └── style-guide.md
@@ -322,8 +323,8 @@ bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
 
 ### Common Errors
 ```
-ERROR: No token sources found
-→ Run /workflow:ui-design:extract or /workflow:ui-design:consolidate
+ERROR: No design tokens found
+→ Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first
 
 ERROR: No targets extracted from prompt
 → Use --targets explicitly or rephrase prompt
@@ -369,9 +370,14 @@ ERROR: Script permission denied
 
 ## Integration
 
-**Input**: Prompt, design-tokens.json, design-space-analysis.json (optional)
+**Input**:
+- Required: Prompt, design-tokens.json
+- Optional: design-space-analysis.json (from `.intermediates/style-analysis/`)
+- Reuses: Layout inspirations from `.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/` (if available from layout-extract)
+
 **Output**: S×L×T prototypes for `/workflow:ui-design:update`
-**Compatible**: extract, consolidate, explore-auto, imitate-auto outputs
+**Compatible**: style-extract, explore-auto, imitate-auto outputs
+**Optimization**: Reuses layout inspirations from layout-extract phase, avoiding duplicate MCP searches
 
 ## Usage Examples
 

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/capture.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: capture
 description: Batch screenshot capture for UI design workflows using MCP or local fallback
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:capture --url-map "<map>" [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>]
 argument-hint: --url-map "target:url,..." [--base-path path] [--session id]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:capture --url-map "home:https://linear.app, pricing:https://linear.app/pricing"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:capture --session WFS-auth --url-map "dashboard:https://app.com/dash"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:capture --base-path ".workflow/.design/run-20250110" --url-map "hero:https://example.com#hero"
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), ListMcpResourcesTool(*), mcp__chrome-devtools__*, mcp__playwright__*
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/consolidate.md

@@ -1,272 +0,0 @@
----
-name: consolidate
-description: Consolidate style variants into independent design systems and plan layout strategies
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path ".workflow/WFS-auth/design-run-20250109-143022" --variants 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session WFS-auth --variants 2
-  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path "./.workflow/.design/run-20250109-150533"  # Uses all variants
-  - /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session WFS-auth  # Process all variants from extraction
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# Design System Consolidation Command
-
-## Overview
-Consolidate style variants into independent production-ready design systems. Refines raw token proposals from `style-extract` into finalized design tokens and style guides.
-
-**Strategy**: Philosophy-Driven Refinement
-- **Agent-Driven**: Uses ui-design-agent for N variant generation
-- **Token Refinement**: Transforms proposed_tokens into complete systems
-- **Production-Ready**: design-tokens.json + style-guide.md per variant
-- **Matrix-Ready**: Provides style variants for generate phase
-
-## Phase 1: Setup & Validation
-
-### Step 1: Resolve Base Path & Load Style Cards
-```bash
-# Determine base path
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
-# OR use --base-path / --session parameters
-
-# Load style cards
-bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
-```
-
-### Step 2: Memory Check (Skip if Already Done)
-```bash
-# Check if already consolidated
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
-```
-
-**If exists**: Skip to completion message
-
-### Step 3: Select Variants
-```bash
-# Determine variant count (default: all from style-cards.json)
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -c "\"id\": \"variant-")
-
-# Validate variant count
-# Priority: --variants parameter → total_variants from style-cards.json
-```
-
-**Output**: `variants_count`, `selected_variants[]`
-
-### Step 4: Load Design Context (Optional)
-```bash
-# Load brainstorming context
-bash(test -f {base_path}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md && cat it)
-
-# Load design space analysis
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json && cat it)
-```
-
-**Output**: `design_context`, `design_space_analysis`
-
-## Phase 2: Design System Synthesis (Agent)
-
-**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` for all variants
-
-### Step 1: Create Output Directories
-```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{{1..{variants_count}}})
-```
-
-### Step 2: Launch Agent Task
-For all variants (1 to {variants_count}):
-```javascript
-Task(ui-design-agent): `
-  [DESIGN_TOKEN_GENERATION_TASK]
-  Generate {variants_count} independent design systems using philosophy-driven refinement
-
-  SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: Philosophy-driven refinement | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
-
-  CRITICAL PATH: Use loop index (N) for directories: style-1/, style-2/, ..., style-N/
-
-  VARIANT DATA:
-  {FOR each variant with index N:
-    VARIANT INDEX: {N} | ID: {variant.id} | NAME: {variant.name}
-    Design Philosophy: {variant.design_philosophy}
-    Proposed Tokens: {variant.proposed_tokens}
-    {IF design_space_analysis: Design Attributes: {attributes}, Anti-keywords: {anti_keywords}}
-  }
-
-  ## 参考
-  - Style cards: Each variant's proposed_tokens and design_philosophy
-  - Design space analysis: design_attributes (saturation, weight, formality, organic/geometric, innovation, density)
-  - Anti-keywords: Explicit constraints to avoid
-  - WCAG AA: 4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI (use built-in AI knowledge)
-
-  ## 生成
-  For EACH variant (use loop index N for paths):
-  1. {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{N}/design-tokens.json
-     - Complete token structure: colors, typography, spacing, border_radius, shadows, breakpoints
-     - All colors in OKLCH format
-     - Apply design_attributes to token values (saturation→chroma, density→spacing, etc.)
-
-  2. {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{N}/style-guide.md
-     - Expanded design philosophy
-     - Complete color system with accessibility notes
-     - Typography documentation
-     - Usage guidelines
-
-  ## 注意
-  - ✅ Use Write() tool immediately for each file
-  - ✅ Use loop index N for directory names: style-1/, style-2/, etc.
-  - ❌ DO NOT use variant.id in paths (metadata only)
-  - ❌ NO external research or MCP calls (pure AI refinement)
-  - Apply philosophy-driven refinement: design_attributes guide token values
-  - Maintain divergence: Use anti_keywords to prevent variant convergence
-  - Complete each variant's files before moving to next variant
-`
-```
-
-**Output**: Agent generates `variants_count × 2` files
-
-## Phase 3: Verify Output
-
-### Step 1: Check Files Created
-```bash
-# Verify all design systems created
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-*/design-tokens.json | wc -l)
-
-# Validate structure
-bash(cat {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
-```
-
-### Step 2: Verify File Sizes
-```bash
-bash(ls -lh {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/)
-```
-
-**Output**: `variants_count × 2` files verified
-
-## Completion
-
-### Todo Update
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {content: "Setup and load style cards", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading style cards"},
-  {content: "Select variants and load context", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading context"},
-  {content: "Generate design systems (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating systems"},
-  {content: "Verify output files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Verifying files"}
-]});
-```
-
-### Output Message
-```
-✅ Design system consolidation complete!
-
-Configuration:
-- Session: {session_id}
-- Variants: {variants_count}
-- Philosophy-driven refinement (zero MCP calls)
-
-Generated Files:
-{base_path}/style-consolidation/
-├── style-1/ (design-tokens.json, style-guide.md)
-├── style-2/ (same structure)
-└── style-{variants_count}/ (same structure)
-
-Next: /workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id} --style-variants {variants_count} --targets "dashboard,auth"
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Path Operations
-```bash
-# Find design directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
-
-# Load style cards
-bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
-
-# Count variants
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -c "\"id\": \"variant-")
-```
-
-### Validation Commands
-```bash
-# Check if already consolidated
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
-
-# Verify output
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-*/design-tokens.json | wc -l)
-
-# Validate structure
-bash(cat design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
-```
-
-### File Operations
-```bash
-# Create directories
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{{1..3}})
-
-# Check file sizes
-bash(ls -lh {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/)
-```
-
-## Output Structure
-
-```
-{base_path}/
-└── style-consolidation/
-    ├── style-1/
-    │   ├── design-tokens.json
-    │   └── style-guide.md
-    ├── style-2/
-    │   ├── design-tokens.json
-    │   └── style-guide.md
-    └── style-N/ (same structure)
-```
-
-## design-tokens.json Format
-
-```json
-{
-  "colors": {
-    "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
-    "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
-    "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
-    "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
-    "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
-  },
-  "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
-  "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", ..., "24": "6rem"},
-  "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", ..., "full": "9999px"},
-  "shadows": {"sm": "...", "md": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "..."},
-  "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
-}
-```
-
-**Requirements**: OKLCH colors, complete coverage, semantic naming
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Common Errors
-```
-ERROR: No style cards found
-→ Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first
-
-ERROR: Invalid variant count
-→ List available count, auto-select all
-
-ERROR: Agent file creation failed
-→ Check agent output, verify Write() operations
-```
-
-## Key Features
-
-- **Philosophy-Driven Refinement** - Pure AI token refinement using design_attributes
-- **Agent-Driven** - Uses ui-design-agent for multi-file generation
-- **Separate Design Systems** - N independent systems (one per variant)
-- **Production-Ready** - WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors, semantic naming
-- **Zero MCP Calls** - Faster execution, better divergence preservation
-
-## Integration
-
-**Input**: `style-cards.json` from `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract`
-**Output**: `style-consolidation/style-{N}/` for each variant
-**Next**: `/workflow:ui-design:generate --style-variants N`
-
-**Note**: After consolidate, use `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` to generate layout templates before running generate.

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/explore-auto.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: explore-auto
 description: Exploratory UI design workflow with style-centric batch generation
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto [--prompt "<desc>"] [--images "<glob>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>] [--batch-plan]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Generate 3 style variants for modern blog: home, article, author"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "SaaS dashboard and settings with 2 layout options"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --images "refs/*.png" --prompt "E-commerce: home, product, cart" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "navbar,hero" --target-type "component" --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 2
+argument-hint: "[--prompt "<desc>"] [--images "<glob>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>] [--batch-plan]""
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*), Task(conceptual-planning-agent)
 ---
 
@@ -26,11 +20,10 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 1. User triggers: `/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto [params]`
 2. Phase 0c: Target confirmation → User confirms → **IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 1**
 3. Phase 1 (style-extract) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-4. Phase 2 (style-consolidate) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-5. Phase 2.5 (layout-extract) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-6. **Phase 3 (ui-assembly)** → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-7. Phase 4 (design-update) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-8. Phase 5 (batch-plan, optional) → Reports completion
+4. Phase 2 (layout-extract) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
+5. **Phase 3 (ui-assembly)** → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
+6. Phase 4 (design-update) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
+7. Phase 5 (batch-plan, optional) → Reports completion
 
 **Phase Transition Mechanism**:
 - **Phase 0c (User Interaction)**: User confirms targets → IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 1
@@ -97,8 +90,8 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 
 **Matrix Mode** (style-centric):
 - Generates `style_variants × layout_variants × targets` prototypes
-- **Phase 1**: `style_variants` style options with design_attributes (extract)
-- **Phase 2**: `style_variants` independent design systems (consolidate)
+- **Phase 1**: `style_variants` complete design systems (extract)
+- **Phase 2**: Layout templates extraction (layout-extract)
 - **Phase 3**: Style-centric batch generation (generate)
   - Sub-phase 1: `targets × layout_variants` target-specific layout plans
   - **Sub-phase 2**: `S` style-centric agents (each handles `L×T` combinations)
@@ -286,18 +279,7 @@ SlashCommand(command)
 # Upon completion, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 2 (auto-continue)
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Style Consolidation
-```bash
-command = "/workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path \"{base_path}\" " +
-          "--variants {style_variants}"
-SlashCommand(command)
-
-# Output: {style_variants} independent design systems with tokens.css
-# SlashCommand blocks until phase complete
-# Upon completion, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 2.5 (auto-continue)
-```
-
-### Phase 2.5: Layout Extraction
+### Phase 2: Layout Extraction
 ```bash
 targets_string = ",".join(inferred_target_list)
 command = "/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --base-path \"{base_path}\" " +
@@ -366,7 +348,6 @@ IF --batch-plan:
 // Initialize IMMEDIATELY after Phase 0c user confirmation to track multi-phase execution
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
-  {"content": "Execute style consolidation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
   {"content": "Execute layout extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
   {"content": "Execute UI assembly", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
   {"content": "Execute design integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."}
@@ -448,9 +429,8 @@ Architecture: Style-Centric Batch Generation
 Run ID: {run_id} | Session: {session_id or "standalone"}
 Type: {icon} {target_type} | Device: {device_type} | Matrix: {s}×{l}×{n} = {total} prototypes
 
-Phase 1: {s} style variants with design_attributes (style-extract)
-Phase 2: {s} design systems with tokens.css (consolidate)
-Phase 2.5: {n×l} layout templates (layout-extract explore mode)
+Phase 1: {s} complete design systems (style-extract)
+Phase 2: {n×l} layout templates (layout-extract explore mode)
   - Device: {device_type} layouts
   - {n} targets × {l} layout variants = {n×l} structural templates
 Phase 3: UI Assembly (generate)
@@ -472,11 +452,13 @@ Design Quality:
 ✅ Device-Optimized: Layouts designed for {device_type}
 
 📂 {base_path}/
-  ├── style-extraction/       ({s} style cards + design-space-analysis.json)
-  ├── style-consolidation/    ({s} design systems with tokens.css)
-  ├── layout-extraction/      ({n×l} layout templates + layout-space-analysis.json)
-  ├── prototypes/             ({total} assembled prototypes)
-  └── .run-metadata.json      (includes device type)
+  ├── .intermediates/          (Intermediate analysis files)
+  │   ├── style-analysis/      (computed-styles.json, design-space-analysis.json)
+  │   └── layout-analysis/     (dom-structure-*.json, inspirations/*.txt)
+  ├── style-extraction/        ({s} complete design systems)
+  ├── layout-extraction/       ({n×l} layout templates + layout-space-analysis.json)
+  ├── prototypes/              ({total} assembled prototypes)
+  └── .run-metadata.json       (includes device type)
 
 🌐 Preview: {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html
   - Interactive {s}×{l} matrix view

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/explore-layers.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: explore-layers
 description: Interactive deep UI capture with depth-controlled layer exploration
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:explore-layers --url <url> --depth <1-5> [--session <id>] [--base-path <path>]
 argument-hint: --url <url> --depth <1-5> [--session id] [--base-path path]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-layers --url "https://app.linear.app" --depth 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-layers --url "https://notion.so" --depth 2 --session WFS-notion-ui
-  - /workflow:ui-design:explore-layers --url "https://app.com/dashboard" --depth 4
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), mcp__chrome-devtools__*
 ---
 

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/generate.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: generate
 description: Assemble UI prototypes by combining layout templates with design tokens (pure assembler)
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:generate [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 2
-  - /workflow:ui-design:generate --base-path ".workflow/WFS-auth/design-run-20250109-143022"
+argument-hint: [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -15,14 +11,14 @@ allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*)
 Pure assembler that combines pre-extracted layout templates with design tokens to generate UI prototypes (`style × layout × targets`). No layout design logic - purely combines existing components.
 
 **Strategy**: Pure Assembly
-- **Input**: `layout-templates.json` + `design-tokens.json`
+- **Input**: `layout-templates.json` + `design-tokens.json` (+ reference images if available)
 - **Process**: Combine structure (DOM) with style (tokens)
 - **Output**: Complete HTML/CSS prototypes
 - **No Design Logic**: All layout and style decisions already made
+- **Automatic Image Reference**: If source images exist in layout templates, they're automatically used for visual context
 
 **Prerequisite Commands**:
-- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → Style tokens
-- `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` → Final design tokens
+- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → Complete design systems (design-tokens.json + style-guide.md)
 - `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → Layout structure
 
 ## Phase 1: Setup & Validation
@@ -33,7 +29,9 @@ Pure assembler that combines pre-extracted layout templates with design tokens t
 bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
 
 # Get style count
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
+
+# Image reference auto-detected from layout template source_image_path
 ```
 
 ### Step 2: Load Layout Templates
@@ -51,10 +49,10 @@ Read({base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
 ### Step 3: Validate Design Tokens
 ```bash
 # Check design tokens exist for all styles
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
 
 # For each style variant: Load design tokens
-Read({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{id}/design-tokens.json)
+Read({base_path}/style-extraction/style-{id}/design-tokens.json)
 ```
 
 **Output**: `design_tokens[]` for all style variants
@@ -82,18 +80,29 @@ Task(ui-design-agent): `
   1. Layout Template:
      Read("{base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json")
      Find template where: target={target} AND variant_id="layout-{layout_id}"
-     Extract: dom_structure, css_layout_rules, device_type
+     Extract: dom_structure, css_layout_rules, device_type, source_image_path
 
   2. Design Tokens:
-     Read("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
+     Read("{base_path}/style-extraction/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
      Extract: ALL token values (colors, typography, spacing, borders, shadows, breakpoints)
 
+  3. Reference Image (AUTO-DETECTED):
+     IF template.source_image_path exists:
+       Read(template.source_image_path)
+       Purpose: Additional visual context for better placeholder content generation
+       Note: This is for reference only - layout and style decisions already made
+     ELSE:
+       Use generic placeholder content
+
   ## Assembly Process
   1. Build HTML: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html
      - Recursively build from template.dom_structure
      - Add: <!DOCTYPE html>, <head>, <meta viewport>
      - CSS link: <link href="{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.css">
-     - Inject placeholder content (Lorem ipsum, sample data)
+     - Inject placeholder content:
+       * Default: Use Lorem ipsum, generic sample data
+       * If reference image available: Generate more contextually appropriate placeholders
+         (e.g., realistic headings, meaningful text snippets that match the visual context)
      - Preserve all attributes from dom_structure
 
   2. Build CSS: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.css
@@ -173,6 +182,7 @@ Configuration:
 - Device Type: {device_type}
 - Targets: {targets}
 - Total Prototypes: {S × L × T}
+- Image Reference: Auto-detected (uses source images when available in layout templates)
 
 Assembly Process:
 - Pure assembly: Combined pre-extracted layouts + design tokens
@@ -181,7 +191,7 @@ Assembly Process:
 
 Quality:
 - Structure: From layout-extract (DOM, CSS layout rules)
-- Style: From consolidate (design tokens)
+- Style: From style-extract (design tokens)
 - CSS: Token values directly applied (var() replaced)
 - Device-optimized: Layouts match device_type from templates
 
@@ -211,7 +221,7 @@ Next: /workflow:ui-design:update
 bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
 
 # Count style variants
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 ```
 
 ### Validation Commands
@@ -220,7 +230,7 @@ bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
 bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
 
 # Check design tokens exist
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
 
 # Count generated files
 bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-*-layout-*.html | wc -l)
@@ -244,9 +254,9 @@ bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
 {base_path}/
 ├── layout-extraction/
 │   └── layout-templates.json      # Input (from layout-extract)
-├── style-consolidation/
+├── style-extraction/
 │   └── style-{s}/
-│       ├── design-tokens.json     # Input (from consolidate)
+│       ├── design-tokens.json     # Input (from style-extract)
 │       └── style-guide.md
 └── prototypes/
     ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html  # Assembled prototypes
@@ -264,7 +274,7 @@ ERROR: Layout templates not found
 → Run /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract first
 
 ERROR: Design tokens not found
-→ Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate first
+→ Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first
 
 ERROR: Agent assembly failed
 → Check inputs exist, validate JSON structure
@@ -300,8 +310,7 @@ ERROR: Script permission denied
 ## Integration
 
 **Prerequisites**:
-- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `style-cards.json`
-- `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` → `design-tokens.json`
+- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `design-tokens.json` + `style-guide.md`
 - `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → `layout-templates.json`
 
 **Input**: `layout-templates.json` + `design-tokens.json`

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/imitate-auto.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: imitate-auto
-description: High-speed multi-page UI replication with batch screenshot and optional token refinement
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "<map>" [--capture-mode <batch|deep>] [--depth <1-5>] [--session <id>] [--refine-tokens] [--prompt "<desc>"]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "home:https://linear.app, features:https://linear.app/features"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --session WFS-payment --url-map "pricing:https://stripe.com/pricing"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "dashboard:https://app.com/dash" --refine-tokens
-  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "app:https://app.com" --capture-mode deep --depth 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "home:https://example.com, about:https://example.com/about" --prompt "Focus on minimalist design"
+description: High-speed multi-page UI replication with batch screenshot capture
+argument-hint: --url-map "<map>" [--capture-mode <batch|deep>] [--depth <1-5>] [--session <id>] [--prompt "<desc>"]
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -25,11 +19,10 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 1. User triggers: `/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "..."`
 2. Phase 0: Initialize and parse parameters
 3. Phase 1: Screenshot capture (batch or deep mode) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-4. Phase 2: Style extraction (visual tokens) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
+4. Phase 2: Style extraction (complete design systems) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
 5. Phase 2.5: Layout extraction (structure templates) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-6. Phase 3: Token processing (conditional consolidate) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-7. Phase 4: Batch UI assembly → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-8. Phase 5: Design system integration → Reports completion
+6. Phase 3: Batch UI assembly → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
+7. Phase 4: Design system integration → Reports completion
 
 **Phase Transition Mechanism**:
 - `SlashCommand` is BLOCKING - execution pauses until completion
@@ -73,13 +66,10 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
   - Enable automatic design system integration (Phase 5)
   - If not provided: standalone mode (`.workflow/.design/`)
 
-- `--refine-tokens` (Optional, default: false): Enable full token refinement
-  - `false` (default): Fast path, skip consolidate (~30-60s faster)
-  - `true`: Production quality, execute full consolidate (philosophy-driven refinement)
-
 - `--prompt "<desc>"` (Optional): Style extraction guidance
   - Influences extract command analysis focus
   - Example: `"Focus on dark mode"`, `"Emphasize minimalist design"`
+  - **Note**: Design systems are now production-ready by default (no separate consolidate step)
 
 ## Execution Modes
 
@@ -92,14 +82,11 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
   - Captures page layers at different depths (1-5)
   - Only processes first URL from url-map
 
-**Token Processing Modes**:
-- **Fast-Track** (default): Skip consolidate, use proposed tokens directly (~2s)
-  - Best for rapid prototyping and testing
-  - Tokens may lack philosophy-driven refinement
-- **Production** (--refine-tokens): Full consolidate with WCAG validation (~60s)
-  - Philosophy-driven token refinement
-  - Complete accessibility validation
-  - Production-ready design system
+**Token Processing**:
+- **Direct Generation**: Complete design systems generated in style-extract phase
+  - Production-ready design-tokens.json with WCAG compliance
+  - Complete style-guide.md documentation
+  - No separate consolidation step required (~30-60s faster)
 
 **Session Integration**:
 - `--session` flag determines session integration or standalone execution
@@ -169,7 +156,6 @@ FOR pair IN split(url_map_string, ","):
 VALIDATE: len(target_names) > 0, "url-map must contain at least one target:url pair"
 
 primary_target = target_names[0]  # First target as primary style source
-refine_tokens_mode = --refine-tokens OR false
 
 # Parse capture mode
 capture_mode = --capture-mode OR "batch"
@@ -204,7 +190,6 @@ metadata = {
         "url_map": url_map,
         "capture_mode": capture_mode,
         "depth": depth IF capture_mode == "deep" ELSE null,
-        "refine_tokens": refine_tokens_mode,
         "prompt": --prompt OR null
     },
     "targets": target_names,
@@ -223,7 +208,6 @@ ELSE:
     REPORT: "    Targets: {len(target_names)} pages"
     REPORT: "    Primary source: '{primary_target}' ({url_map[primary_target]})"
     REPORT: "    All targets: {', '.join(target_names)}"
-REPORT: "  Token refinement: {refine_tokens_mode ? 'Enabled (production quality)' : 'Disabled (fast-track)'}"
 IF --prompt:
     REPORT: "  Prompt guidance: \"{--prompt}\""
 REPORT: ""
@@ -232,9 +216,8 @@ REPORT: ""
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Initialize and parse url-map", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing"},
   {content: capture_mode == "batch" ? f"Batch screenshot capture ({len(target_names)} targets)" : f"Deep exploration (depth {depth})", status: "pending", activeForm: "Capturing screenshots"},
-  {content: "Extract style (visual tokens)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting style"},
+  {content: "Extract style (complete design systems)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting style"},
   {content: "Extract layout (structure templates)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting layout"},
-  {content: refine_tokens_mode ? "Refine design tokens via consolidate" : "Fast token adaptation (skip consolidate)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Processing tokens"},
   {content: f"Assemble UI for {len(target_names)} targets", status: "pending", activeForm: "Assembling UI"},
   {content: session_id ? "Integrate design system" : "Standalone completion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Completing"}
 ]})
@@ -376,31 +359,31 @@ CATCH error:
     ERROR: "Cannot proceed without visual tokens"
     EXIT 1
 
-# style-extract outputs to: {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json
+# style-extract outputs to: {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
 
 # Verify extraction results
-style_cards_path = "{base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json"
+design_tokens_path = "{base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json"
+style_guide_path = "{base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md"
 
-IF NOT exists(style_cards_path):
-    ERROR: "style-extract command did not generate style-cards.json"
-    ERROR: "Expected: {style_cards_path}"
+IF NOT exists(design_tokens_path):
+    ERROR: "style-extract command did not generate design-tokens.json"
+    ERROR: "Expected: {design_tokens_path}"
     EXIT 1
 
-style_cards = Read(style_cards_path)
-
-IF len(style_cards.style_cards) != 1:
-    ERROR: "Expected single variant in imitate mode, got {len(style_cards.style_cards)}"
+IF NOT exists(style_guide_path):
+    ERROR: "style-extract command did not generate style-guide.md"
+    ERROR: "Expected: {style_guide_path}"
     EXIT 1
 
-extracted_style = style_cards.style_cards[0]
+design_tokens = Read(design_tokens_path)
 
 REPORT: ""
 REPORT: "✅ Phase 2 complete:"
-REPORT: "   Style: '{extracted_style.name}'"
-REPORT: "   Philosophy: {extracted_style.design_philosophy}"
-REPORT: "   Tokens: {count_tokens(extracted_style.proposed_tokens)} visual tokens"
+REPORT: "   Output: style-extraction/style-1/"
+REPORT: "   Files: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md"
+REPORT: "   Quality: Production-ready (WCAG AA)"
 
-TodoWrite(mark_completed: "Extract style (visual tokens)",
+TodoWrite(mark_completed: "Extract style (complete design systems)",
           mark_in_progress: "Extract layout (structure templates)")
 ```
 
@@ -450,125 +433,20 @@ REPORT: "   Templates: {template_count} layout structures"
 REPORT: "   Targets: {', '.join(target_names)}"
 
 TodoWrite(mark_completed: "Extract layout (structure templates)",
-          mark_in_progress: refine_tokens_mode ? "Refine design tokens via consolidate" : "Fast token adaptation")
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Token Processing (Conditional Consolidate)
-
-```bash
-REPORT: ""
-REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
-REPORT: "🚀 Phase 3: Token Processing"
-REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
-
-IF refine_tokens_mode:
-    # Path A: Full consolidate (production quality)
-    REPORT: "🔧 Using full consolidate for production-ready tokens"
-    REPORT: "   Benefits:"
-    REPORT: "   • Philosophy-driven token refinement"
-    REPORT: "   • WCAG AA accessibility validation"
-    REPORT: "   • Complete design system documentation"
-    REPORT: "   • Token gap filling and consistency checks"
-    REPORT: ""
-
-    consolidate_command = f"/workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path \"{base_path}\" --variants 1"
-
-    REPORT: f"Calling consolidate command..."
-
-    TRY:
-        SlashCommand(consolidate_command)
-    CATCH error:
-        ERROR: "Token consolidation failed: {error}"
-        ERROR: "Cannot proceed without refined tokens"
-        EXIT 1
-
-    # consolidate outputs to: {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json
-    tokens_path = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json"
-
-    IF NOT exists(tokens_path):
-        ERROR: "consolidate command did not generate design-tokens.json"
-        ERROR: "Expected: {tokens_path}"
-        EXIT 1
-
-    REPORT: ""
-    REPORT: "✅ Full consolidate complete"
-    REPORT: "   Output: style-consolidation/style-1/"
-    REPORT: "   Quality: Production-ready"
-    token_quality = "production-ready (consolidated)"
-    time_spent_estimate = "~60s"
-
-ELSE:
-    # Path B: Fast Token Adaptation
-    REPORT: "⚡ Fast token adaptation (skipping consolidate for speed)"
-    REPORT: "   Note: Using proposed tokens from extraction phase"
-    REPORT: "   For production quality, re-run with --refine-tokens flag"
-    REPORT: ""
-
-    # Directly copy proposed_tokens to consolidation directory
-    style_cards = Read("{base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json")
-    proposed_tokens = style_cards.style_cards[0].proposed_tokens
-
-    # Create directory and write tokens
-    consolidation_dir = "{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1"
-    Bash(mkdir -p "{consolidation_dir}")
-
-    tokens_path = f"{consolidation_dir}/design-tokens.json"
-    Write(tokens_path, JSON.stringify(proposed_tokens, null, 2))
-
-    # Create simplified style guide
-    variant = style_cards.style_cards[0]
-    simple_guide = f"""# Design System: {variant.name}
-
-## Design Philosophy
-{variant.design_philosophy}
-
-## Description
-{variant.description}
-
-## Design Tokens
-All tokens in `design-tokens.json` follow OKLCH color space.
-
-**Note**: Generated in fast-track imitate mode using proposed tokens from extraction.
-For production-ready quality with philosophy-driven refinement, re-run with `--refine-tokens` flag.
-
-## Color Preview
-- Primary: {variant.preview.primary if variant.preview else "N/A"}
-- Background: {variant.preview.background if variant.preview else "N/A"}
-
-## Typography Preview
-- Heading Font: {variant.preview.font_heading if variant.preview else "N/A"}
-
-## Token Categories
-{list_token_categories(proposed_tokens)}
-"""
-
-    Write(f"{consolidation_dir}/style-guide.md", simple_guide)
-
-    REPORT: "✅ Fast adaptation complete (~2s vs ~60s with consolidate)"
-    REPORT: "   Output: style-consolidation/style-1/"
-    REPORT: "   Quality: Proposed (not refined)"
-    REPORT: "   Time saved: ~30-60s"
-    token_quality = "proposed (fast-track)"
-    time_spent_estimate = "~2s"
-
-REPORT: ""
-REPORT: "Token processing summary:"
-REPORT: "   Path: {refine_tokens_mode ? 'Full consolidate' : 'Fast adaptation'}"
-REPORT: "   Quality: {token_quality}"
-REPORT: "   Time: {time_spent_estimate}"
-
-TodoWrite(mark_completed: refine_tokens_mode ? "Refine design tokens via consolidate" : "Fast token adaptation",
           mark_in_progress: f"Assemble UI for {len(target_names)} targets")
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: Batch UI Assembly
+### Phase 3: Batch UI Assembly
 
 ```bash
 REPORT: ""
 REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
-REPORT: "🚀 Phase 4: Batch UI Assembly"
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 3: Batch UI Assembly"
 REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
 
+# Note: design-tokens.json already generated in Phase 2 (style-extract)
+# Located at: {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
+
 # Build targets string
 targets_string = ",".join(target_names)
 
@@ -608,12 +486,12 @@ TodoWrite(mark_completed: f"Assemble UI for {len(target_names)} targets",
           mark_in_progress: session_id ? "Integrate design system" : "Standalone completion")
 ```
 
-### Phase 5: Design System Integration
+### Phase 4: Design System Integration
 
 ```bash
 REPORT: ""
 REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
-REPORT: "🚀 Phase 5: Design System Integration"
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 4: Design System Integration"
 REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
 
 IF session_id:
@@ -642,9 +520,8 @@ metadata.status = "completed"
 metadata.completion_time = current_timestamp()
 metadata.outputs = {
     "screenshots": f"{base_path}/screenshots/",
-    "style_system": f"{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/",
+    "style_system": f"{base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/",
     "prototypes": f"{base_path}/prototypes/",
-    "token_quality": token_quality,
     "captured_count": captured_count,
     "generated_count": generated_count
 }
@@ -656,9 +533,9 @@ TodoWrite(mark_completed: session_id ? "Integrate design system" : "Standalone c
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Initialize and parse url-map", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing"},
   {content: capture_mode == "batch" ? f"Batch screenshot capture ({len(target_names)} targets)" : f"Deep exploration (depth {depth})", status: "completed", activeForm: "Capturing"},
-  {content: "Extract unified design system", status: "completed", activeForm: "Extracting"},
-  {content: refine_tokens_mode ? "Refine design tokens via consolidate" : "Fast token adaptation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Processing"},
-  {content: f"Generate UI for {len(target_names)} targets", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating"},
+  {content: "Extract style (complete design systems)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Extracting"},
+  {content: "Extract layout (structure templates)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Extracting layout"},
+  {content: f"Assemble UI for {len(target_names)} targets", status: "completed", activeForm: "Assembling"},
   {content: session_id ? "Integrate design system" : "Standalone completion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Completing"}
 ]})
 ```
@@ -680,24 +557,18 @@ Run ID: {run_id}
 Phase 1 - Screenshot Capture: ✅ {IF capture_mode == "batch": f"{captured_count}/{total_requested} screenshots" ELSE: f"{captured_count} screenshots ({total_layers} layers)"}
   {IF capture_mode == "batch" AND captured_count < total_requested: f"⚠️ {total_requested - captured_count} missing" ELSE: "All targets captured"}
 
-Phase 2 - Style Extraction: ✅ Single unified design system
-  Style: {extracted_style.name}
-  Philosophy: {extracted_style.design_philosophy[:80]}...
+Phase 2 - Style Extraction: ✅ Production-ready design systems
+  Output: style-extraction/style-1/ (design-tokens.json + style-guide.md)
+  Quality: WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors
 
-Phase 3 - Token Processing: ✅ {token_quality}
-  {IF refine_tokens_mode:
-    "Full consolidate (~60s)"
-    "Quality: Production-ready with philosophy-driven refinement"
-  ELSE:
-    "Fast adaptation (~2s, saved ~30-60s)"
-    "Quality: Proposed tokens (for production, use --refine-tokens)"
-  }
+Phase 2.5 - Layout Extraction: ✅ Structure templates
+  Templates: {template_count} layout structures
 
-Phase 4 - UI Generation: ✅ {generated_count} pages generated
+Phase 3 - UI Assembly: ✅ {generated_count} pages assembled
   Targets: {', '.join(target_names)}
   Configuration: 1 style × 1 layout × {generated_count} pages
 
-Phase 5 - Integration: {IF session_id: "✅ Integrated into session" ELSE: "⏭️ Standalone mode"}
+Phase 4 - Integration: {IF session_id: "✅ Integrated into session" ELSE: "⏭️ Standalone mode"}
 
 ━━━ 📂 Output Structure ━━━
 
@@ -716,12 +587,12 @@ ELSE:
 │   │   └── {layers}.png
 │   └── layer-map.json
 }
-├── style-extraction/               # Design analysis
-│   └── style-cards.json
-├── style-consolidation/            # {token_quality}
+├── style-extraction/               # Production-ready design systems
 │   └── style-1/
 │       ├── design-tokens.json
 │       └── style-guide.md
+├── layout-extraction/              # Structure templates
+│   └── layout-templates.json
 └── prototypes/                     # {generated_count} HTML/CSS files
     ├── {target1}-style-1-layout-1.html + .css
     ├── {target2}-style-1-layout-1.html + .css
@@ -756,13 +627,6 @@ ELSE:
 3. Explore prototypes in {base_path}/prototypes/ directory
 }
 
-{IF NOT refine_tokens_mode:
-💡 Production Quality Tip:
-   Fast-track mode used proposed tokens for speed.
-   For production-ready quality with full token refinement:
-   /workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --url-map "{url_map_command_string}" --refine-tokens {f"--session {session_id}" if session_id else ""}
-}
-
 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 ```
 
@@ -773,9 +637,9 @@ ELSE:
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Initialize and parse url-map", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Initializing"},
   {content: "Batch screenshot capture", status: "pending", activeForm: "Capturing screenshots"},
-  {content: "Extract unified design system", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting style"},
-  {content: refine_tokens ? "Refine tokens via consolidate" : "Fast token adaptation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Processing tokens"},
-  {content: "Generate UI for all targets", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating UI"},
+  {content: "Extract style (complete design systems)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting style"},
+  {content: "Extract layout (structure templates)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting layout"},
+  {content: "Assemble UI for all targets", status: "pending", activeForm: "Assembling UI"},
   {content: "Integrate design system", status: "pending", activeForm: "Integrating"}
 ]})
 
@@ -824,7 +688,7 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 ## Key Features
 
 - **🚀 Dual Capture**: Batch mode for speed, deep mode for detail
-- **⚡ Fast-Track Option**: Skip consolidate for 30-60s time savings
+- **⚡ Production-Ready**: Complete design systems generated directly (~30-60s faster)
 - **🎨 High-Fidelity**: Single unified design system from primary target
 - **📦 Autonomous**: No user intervention required between phases
 - **🔄 Reproducible**: Deterministic flow with isolated run directories
@@ -838,10 +702,10 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 # Result: 2 prototypes with fast-track tokens
 ```
 
-### 2. Production-Ready with Session
+### 2. Session Integration
 ```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --session WFS-payment --url-map "pricing:https://stripe.com/pricing" --refine-tokens
-# Result: 1 prototype with production tokens, integrated into session
+/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto --session WFS-payment --url-map "pricing:https://stripe.com/pricing"
+# Result: 1 prototype with production-ready design system, integrated into session
 ```
 
 ### 3. Deep Exploration Mode
@@ -858,16 +722,16 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 
 ## Integration Points
 
-- **Input**: `--url-map` (multiple target:url pairs) + optional `--capture-mode`, `--depth`, `--session`, `--refine-tokens`, `--prompt`
-- **Output**: Complete design system in `{base_path}/` (screenshots, style-extraction, style-consolidation, prototypes)
+- **Input**: `--url-map` (multiple target:url pairs) + optional `--capture-mode`, `--depth`, `--session`, `--prompt`
+- **Output**: Complete design system in `{base_path}/` (screenshots, style-extraction, layout-extraction, prototypes)
 - **Sub-commands Called**:
   1. Phase 1 (conditional):
      - `--capture-mode batch`: `/workflow:ui-design:capture` (multi-URL batch)
      - `--capture-mode deep`: `/workflow:ui-design:explore-layers` (single-URL depth exploration)
-  2. `/workflow:ui-design:extract` (Phase 2)
-  3. `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` (Phase 3, conditional)
-  4. `/workflow:ui-design:generate` (Phase 4)
-  5. `/workflow:ui-design:update` (Phase 5, if --session)
+  2. `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` (Phase 2 - complete design systems)
+  3. `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` (Phase 2.5 - structure templates)
+  4. `/workflow:ui-design:generate` (Phase 3 - pure assembly)
+  5. `/workflow:ui-design:update` (Phase 4, if --session)
 
 ## Completion Output
 
@@ -878,20 +742,20 @@ Mode: {capture_mode} | Session: {session_id or "standalone"}
 Run ID: {run_id}
 
 Phase 1 - Screenshot Capture: ✅ {captured_count} screenshots
-Phase 2 - Style Extraction: ✅ Single unified design system
-Phase 3 - Token Processing: ✅ {token_quality}
-Phase 4 - UI Generation: ✅ {generated_count} pages generated
-Phase 5 - Integration: {IF session_id: "✅ Integrated" ELSE: "⏭️ Standalone"}
+Phase 2 - Style Extraction: ✅ Production-ready design systems
+Phase 2.5 - Layout Extraction: ✅ Structure templates
+Phase 3 - UI Assembly: ✅ {generated_count} pages assembled
+Phase 4 - Integration: {IF session_id: "✅ Integrated" ELSE: "⏭️ Standalone"}
 
 Design Quality:
 ✅ High-Fidelity Replication: Accurate style from primary target
 ✅ Token-Driven Styling: 100% var() usage
-✅ {IF refine_tokens: "Production-Ready: WCAG validated" ELSE: "Fast-Track: Proposed tokens"}
+✅ Production-Ready: WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors
 
 📂 {base_path}/
   ├── screenshots/                  # {captured_count} screenshots
-  ├── style-extraction/             # Design analysis
-  ├── style-consolidation/          # {token_quality}
+  ├── style-extraction/style-1/     # Production-ready design system
+  ├── layout-extraction/            # Structure templates
   └── prototypes/                   # {generated_count} HTML/CSS files
 
 🌐 Preview: {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/layout-extract.md

@@ -1,21 +1,18 @@
 ---
 name: layout-extract
 description: Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text prompts
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--urls "<list>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--mode <imitate|explore>] [--variants <count>] [--device-type <desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive>]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --urls "home:https://linear.app" --mode imitate --targets "home"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --images "refs/*.png" --mode explore --variants 3 --targets "dashboard"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --prompt "Two-column blog with sticky sidebar" --mode explore --variants 2 --targets "blog-post"
-  - /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --session WFS-auth --urls "login:https://clerk.dev" --device-type mobile --targets "login"
+argument-hint: [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--urls "<list>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--mode <imitate|explore>] [--variants <count>] [--device-type <desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive>]
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), Task(ui-design-agent), mcp__exa__web_search_exa(*)
 ---
 
 # Layout Extraction Command
 
 ## Overview
+
 Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text prompts using AI analysis. This command separates the "scaffolding" (HTML structure and CSS layout) from the "paint" (visual tokens handled by `style-extract`).
 
 **Strategy**: AI-Driven Structural Analysis
+
 - **Agent-Powered**: Uses `ui-design-agent` for deep structural analysis
 - **Dual-Mode**:
   - `imitate`: High-fidelity replication of single layout structure
@@ -27,6 +24,7 @@ Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text promp
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Detect Input, Mode & Targets
+
 ```bash
 # Detect input source
 # Priority: --urls + --images → hybrid | --urls → url | --images → image | --prompt → text
@@ -70,15 +68,59 @@ Read({image_path})  # Load each image
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Memory Check (Skip if Already Done)
+### Step 2.5: Extract DOM Structure (URL Mode - Enhancement)
 ```bash
-# Check if layouts already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
+# If URLs are available, extract real DOM structure
+# This provides accurate layout data to supplement visual analysis
+
+# For each URL in url_list:
+IF url_available AND mcp_chrome_devtools_available:
+    # Read extraction script
+    Read(~/.claude/scripts/extract-layout-structure.js)
+
+    # Open page in Chrome DevTools
+    mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page(url="{target_url}")
+
+    # Execute layout extraction script
+    result = mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script(function="[SCRIPT_CONTENT]")
+
+    # Save DOM structure for this target (intermediate file)
+    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis)
+    Write({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/dom-structure-{target}.json, result)
+
+    dom_structure_available = true
+ELSE:
+    dom_structure_available = false
 ```
 
-**If exists**: Skip to completion message
+**Extraction Script Reference**: `~/.claude/scripts/extract-layout-structure.js`
 
-**Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `targets[]`, `device_type`, loaded inputs
+**Usage**: Read the script file and use content directly in `mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script()`
+
+**Script returns**:
+- `metadata`: Extraction timestamp, URL, method
+- `patterns`: Layout pattern statistics (flexColumn, flexRow, grid counts)
+- `structure`: Hierarchical DOM tree with layout properties
+
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Real flex/grid configuration (justifyContent, alignItems, gap, etc.)
+- ✅ Accurate element bounds (x, y, width, height)
+- ✅ Structural hierarchy with depth control
+- ✅ Layout pattern identification (flex-row, flex-column, grid-NCol)
+
+### Step 3: Memory Check
+```bash
+# 1. Check if inputs cached in session memory
+IF session_has_inputs: SKIP Step 2 file reading
+
+# 2. Check if output already exists
+bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
+IF exists: SKIP to completion
+```
+
+---
+
+**Phase 0 Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `targets[]`, `device_type`, loaded inputs
 
 ## Phase 1: Layout Research (Explore Mode Only)
 
@@ -92,13 +134,13 @@ bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists
 
 ### Step 2: Gather Layout Inspiration (Explore Mode)
 ```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations)
 
 # For each target: Research via MCP
 # mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query="{target} layout patterns {device_type}", numResults=5)
 
 # Write inspiration file
-Write({base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, inspiration_content)
+Write({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, inspiration_content)
 ```
 
 **Output**: Inspiration text files for each target (explore mode only)
@@ -120,14 +162,28 @@ Task(ui-design-agent): `
   - Targets: {targets}  // List of page/component names
   - Variants per Target: {variants_count}
   - Device Type: {device_type}
-  ${exploration_mode ? "- Layout Inspiration: Read('" + base_path + "/layout-extraction/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt')" : ""}
+  ${exploration_mode ? "- Layout Inspiration: Read('" + base_path + "/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt')" : ""}
+  ${dom_structure_available ? "- DOM Structure Data: Read('" + base_path + "/.intermediates/layout-analysis/dom-structure-{target}.json') - USE THIS for accurate layout properties" : ""}
 
   ## Analysis & Generation
+  ${dom_structure_available ? "IMPORTANT: You have access to real DOM structure data with accurate flex/grid properties, bounds, and hierarchy. Use this data as ground truth for layout analysis." : ""}
   For EACH target in {targets}:
     For EACH variant (1 to {variants_count}):
-      1. **Analyze Structure**: Deconstruct reference to understand layout, hierarchy, responsiveness
+      1. **Analyze Structure**:
+         ${dom_structure_available ?
+           "- Use DOM structure data as primary source for layout properties" +
+           "- Extract real flex/grid configurations (display, flexDirection, justifyContent, alignItems, gap)" +
+           "- Use actual element bounds for responsive breakpoint decisions" +
+           "- Preserve identified patterns (flex-row, flex-column, grid-NCol)" +
+           "- Reference screenshots for visual context only" :
+           "- Deconstruct reference images/URLs to understand layout, hierarchy, responsiveness"}
       2. **Define Philosophy**: Short description (e.g., "Asymmetrical grid with overlapping content areas")
-      3. **Generate DOM Structure**: JSON object representing semantic HTML5 structure
+      3. **Generate DOM Structure**:
+         ${dom_structure_available ?
+           "- Base structure on extracted DOM tree from .intermediates" +
+           "- Preserve semantic tags and hierarchy from dom-structure-{target}.json" +
+           "- Maintain layout patterns identified in patterns field" :
+           "- JSON object representing semantic HTML5 structure"}
          - Semantic tags: <header>, <nav>, <main>, <aside>, <section>, <footer>
          - ARIA roles and accessibility attributes
          - Device-specific structure:
@@ -139,7 +195,12 @@ Task(ui-design-agent): `
       4. **Define Component Hierarchy**: High-level array of main layout regions
          Example: ["header", "main-content", "sidebar", "footer"]
       5. **Generate CSS Layout Rules**:
-         - Focus ONLY on layout (Grid, Flexbox, position, alignment, gap, etc.)
+         ${dom_structure_available ?
+           "- Use real layout properties from DOM structure data" +
+           "- Convert extracted flex/grid values to CSS rules" +
+           "- Preserve actual gap, justifyContent, alignItems values" +
+           "- Use element bounds to inform responsive breakpoints" :
+           "- Focus ONLY on layout (Grid, Flexbox, position, alignment, gap, etc.)"}
          - Use CSS Custom Properties for spacing/breakpoints: var(--spacing-4), var(--breakpoint-md)
          - Device-specific styles (mobile-first @media for responsive)
          - NO colors, NO fonts, NO shadows - layout structure only
@@ -149,6 +210,11 @@ Task(ui-design-agent): `
   Each template must include:
   - target (string)
   - variant_id (string, e.g., "layout-1")
+  - source_image_path (string, REQUIRED): Path to the primary reference image used for this layout analysis
+    * For image input: Use the actual image file path from {images_pattern}
+    * For URL input: Use the screenshot path if available, or empty string
+    * For text/prompt input: Use empty string
+    * Example: "{base_path}/screenshots/home.png"
   - device_type (string)
   - design_philosophy (string)
   - dom_structure (JSON object)
@@ -225,7 +291,7 @@ bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
 
 # Create output directories
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction)
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations)  # explore mode only
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations)  # explore mode only
 ```
 
 ### Validation Commands
@@ -247,7 +313,7 @@ bash(ls {images_pattern})
 Read({image_path})
 
 # Write inspiration files (explore mode)
-Write({base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, content)
+Write({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, content)
 
 # Write layout templates
 bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
@@ -257,11 +323,14 @@ bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
 
 ```
 {base_path}/
-└── layout-extraction/
-    ├── layout-templates.json         # Structural layout templates
-    ├── layout-space-analysis.json    # Layout directions (explore mode only)
-    └── _inspirations/                 # Explore mode only
-        └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt  # Layout inspiration research
+├── .intermediates/                    # Intermediate analysis files
+│   └── layout-analysis/
+│       ├── dom-structure-{target}.json   # Extracted DOM structure (URL mode only)
+│       └── inspirations/                 # Explore mode only
+│           └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt # Layout inspiration research
+└── layout-extraction/                 # Final layout templates
+    ├── layout-templates.json          # Structural layout templates
+    └── layout-space-analysis.json     # Layout directions (explore mode only)
 ```
 
 ## layout-templates.json Format
@@ -281,6 +350,7 @@ bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
     {
       "target": "home",
       "variant_id": "layout-1",
+      "source_image_path": "{base_path}/screenshots/home.png",
       "device_type": "responsive",
       "design_philosophy": "Responsive 3-column holy grail layout with fixed header and footer",
       "dom_structure": {
@@ -342,10 +412,13 @@ ERROR: MCP search failed (explore mode)
 
 ## Key Features
 
+- **Hybrid Extraction Strategy** - Combines real DOM structure data with AI visual analysis
+- **Accurate Layout Properties** - Chrome DevTools extracts real flex/grid configurations, bounds, and hierarchy
 - **Separation of Concerns** - Decouples layout (structure) from style (visuals)
 - **Structural Exploration** - Explore mode enables A/B testing of different layouts
 - **Token-Based Layout** - CSS uses `var()` placeholders for instant design system adaptation
 - **Device-Specific** - Tailored structures for different screen sizes
+- **Graceful Fallback** - Works with images/text when URL unavailable
 - **Foundation for Assembly** - Provides structural blueprint for refactored `generate` command
 - **Agent-Powered** - Deep structural analysis with AI
 
@@ -354,10 +427,9 @@ ERROR: MCP search failed (explore mode)
 **Workflow Position**: Between style extraction and prototype generation
 
 **New Workflow**:
-1. `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `style-cards.json` (Visual tokens)
-2. `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` → `design-tokens.json` (Final visual system)
-3. `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → `layout-templates.json` (Structural templates)
-4. `/workflow:ui-design:generate` (Refactored as assembler):
+1. `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `design-tokens.json` + `style-guide.md` (Complete design systems)
+2. `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → `layout-templates.json` (Structural templates)
+3. `/workflow:ui-design:generate` (Pure assembler):
    - **Reads**: `design-tokens.json` + `layout-templates.json`
    - **Action**: For each style × layout combination:
      1. Build HTML from `dom_structure`

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/style-extract.md

@@ -1,26 +1,21 @@
 ---
 name: style-extract
 description: Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's analysis
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:style-extract [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--mode <imitate|explore>] [--variants <count>]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:style-extract --images "design-refs/*.png" --mode explore --variants 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:style-extract --prompt "Modern minimalist blog, dark theme" --mode explore --variants 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png" --prompt "Linear.app style" --mode imitate
-  - /workflow:ui-design:style-extract --base-path ".workflow/WFS-auth/design-run-20250109-143022" --images "refs/*.png" --mode explore --variants 3
-  - /workflow:ui-design:style-extract --prompt "Bold vibrant" --mode imitate  # High-fidelity single style
+argument-hint: "[--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--mode <imitate|explore>] [--variants <count>]"
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
 # Style Extraction Command
 
 ## Overview
-Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's built-in analysis. Generates `style-cards.json` with multiple design variants containing token proposals for consolidation.
+Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's built-in analysis. Directly generates production-ready design systems with complete `design-tokens.json` and `style-guide.md` for each variant.
 
 **Strategy**: AI-Driven Design Space Exploration
 - **Claude-Native**: 100% Claude analysis, no external tools
-- **Single Output**: `style-cards.json` with embedded token proposals
+- **Direct Output**: Complete design systems (design-tokens.json + style-guide.md)
 - **Flexible Input**: Images, text prompts, or both (hybrid mode)
 - **Maximum Contrast**: AI generates maximally divergent design directions
+- **Production-Ready**: WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors, semantic naming
 
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
@@ -45,7 +40,48 @@ bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
 # OR use --base-path / --session parameters
 ```
 
-### Step 2: Load Inputs
+### Step 2: Extract Computed Styles (URL Mode - Optional Enhancement)
+```bash
+# If URL is available from capture metadata, extract real CSS values
+# This provides accurate design tokens to supplement visual analysis
+
+# Check for URL metadata from capture phase
+Read({base_path}/.metadata/capture-urls.json)  # If exists
+
+# For each URL in capture metadata:
+IF url_available AND mcp_chrome_devtools_available:
+    # Read extraction script
+    Read(~/.claude/scripts/extract-computed-styles.js)
+
+    # Open page in Chrome DevTools
+    mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page(url="{target_url}")
+
+    # Execute extraction script directly
+    result = mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script(function="[SCRIPT_CONTENT]")
+
+    # Save computed styles to intermediates directory
+    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis)
+    Write({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/computed-styles.json, result)
+
+    computed_styles_available = true
+ELSE:
+    computed_styles_available = false
+```
+
+**Extraction Script Reference**: `~/.claude/scripts/extract-computed-styles.js`
+
+**Usage**: Read the script file and use content directly in `mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script()`
+
+**Script returns**:
+- `metadata`: Extraction timestamp, URL, method
+- `tokens`: Organized design tokens (colors, borderRadii, shadows, fontSizes, fontWeights, spacing)
+
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Pixel-perfect accuracy for border-radius, box-shadow, padding, etc.
+- ✅ Eliminates guessing from visual analysis
+- ✅ Provides ground truth for design tokens
+
+### Step 3: Load Inputs
 ```bash
 # For image mode
 bash(ls {images_pattern})  # Expand glob pattern
@@ -58,15 +94,19 @@ Read({image_path})  # Load each image
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Memory Check (Skip if Already Done)
+### Step 3: Memory Check
 ```bash
-# Check if already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "exists")
+# 1. Check if inputs cached in session memory
+IF session_has_inputs: SKIP Step 2 file reading
+
+# 2. Check if output already exists
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
+IF exists: SKIP to completion
 ```
 
-**If exists**: Skip to completion message
+---
 
-**Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `loaded_images[]` or `prompt_guidance`
+**Phase 0 Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `loaded_images[]` or `prompt_guidance`
 
 ## Phase 1: Design Space Analysis (Explore Mode Only)
 
@@ -99,42 +139,101 @@ AI analyzes requirements and generates `variants_count` maximally contrasting de
 
 ### Step 4: Write Design Space Analysis
 ```bash
-bash(echo '{design_space_analysis}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis)
+bash(echo '{design_space_analysis}' > {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/design-space-analysis.json)
 
 # Verify output
-bash(test -f design-space-analysis.json && echo "saved")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/design-space-analysis.json && echo "saved")
 ```
 
-**Output**: `design-space-analysis.json` for consolidation phase
+**Output**: `design-space-analysis.json` (intermediate analysis file)
 
-## Phase 2: Style Synthesis & File Write
+## Phase 2: Design System Generation (Agent)
 
-### Step 1: Claude Native Analysis
-AI generates `variants_count` design style proposals:
+**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` for all variants
 
-**Input**:
-- Input mode (image/text/hybrid)
-- Visual references or text guidance
-- Design space analysis (explore mode only)
-- Variant-specific directions (explore mode only)
-
-**Analysis Rules**:
-- **Explore mode**: Each variant follows pre-defined philosophy and attributes, maintains maximum contrast
-- **Imitate mode**: High-fidelity replication of reference design
-- OKLCH color format
-- Complete token proposals (colors, typography, spacing, border_radius, shadows, breakpoints)
-- WCAG AA accessibility (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
-
-**Output Format**: `style-cards.json` with:
-- extraction_metadata (session_id, input_mode, extraction_mode, timestamp, variants_count)
-- style_cards[] (id, name, description, design_philosophy, preview, proposed_tokens)
-
-### Step 2: Write Style Cards
+### Step 1: Create Output Directories
 ```bash
-bash(echo '{style_cards_json}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/style-{{1..{variants_count}}})
 ```
 
-**Output**: `style-cards.json` with `variants_count` complete variants
+### Step 2: Launch Agent Task
+For all variants (1 to {variants_count}):
+```javascript
+Task(ui-design-agent): `
+  [DESIGN_SYSTEM_GENERATION_TASK]
+  Generate {variants_count} independent production-ready design systems
+
+  SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: {extraction_mode} | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+
+  CRITICAL PATH: Use loop index (N) for directories: style-1/, style-2/, ..., style-N/
+
+  VARIANT DATA:
+  {FOR each variant with index N:
+    VARIANT INDEX: {N}
+    {IF extraction_mode == "explore":
+      Design Philosophy: {divergent_direction[N].philosophy_name}
+      Design Attributes: {divergent_direction[N].design_attributes}
+      Search Keywords: {divergent_direction[N].search_keywords}
+      Anti-keywords: {divergent_direction[N].anti_keywords}
+    }
+  }
+
+  ## Input Analysis
+  - Input mode: {input_mode} (image/text/hybrid)
+  - Visual references: {loaded_images OR prompt_guidance}
+  - Computed styles: {computed_styles if available}
+  - Design space analysis: {design_space_analysis if explore mode}
+
+  ## Analysis Rules
+  - **Explore mode**: Each variant follows pre-defined philosophy and attributes
+  - **Imitate mode**: High-fidelity replication of reference design
+    - If computed_styles available: Use as ground truth for border-radius, shadows, spacing, typography, colors
+    - Otherwise: Visual inference
+  - OKLCH color format (convert RGB from computed styles)
+  - WCAG AA compliance: 4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI
+
+  ## Generate (For EACH variant, use loop index N for paths)
+  1. {base_path}/style-extraction/style-{N}/design-tokens.json
+     - Complete token structure: colors, typography, spacing, border_radius, shadows, breakpoints
+     - All colors in OKLCH format
+     - {IF explore mode: Apply design_attributes to token values (saturation→chroma, density→spacing, etc.)}
+
+  2. {base_path}/style-extraction/style-{N}/style-guide.md
+     - Expanded design philosophy
+     - Complete color system with accessibility notes
+     - Typography documentation
+     - Usage guidelines
+
+  ## Critical Requirements
+  - ✅ Use Write() tool immediately for each file
+  - ✅ Use loop index N for directory names: style-1/, style-2/, etc.
+  - ❌ NO external research or MCP calls (pure AI generation)
+  - {IF explore mode: Apply philosophy-driven refinement using design_attributes}
+  - {IF explore mode: Maintain divergence using anti_keywords}
+  - Complete each variant's files before moving to next variant
+`
+```
+
+**Output**: Agent generates `variants_count × 2` files
+
+## Phase 3: Verify Output
+
+### Step 1: Check Files Created
+```bash
+# Verify all design systems created
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-*/design-tokens.json | wc -l)
+
+# Validate structure
+bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
+```
+
+### Step 2: Verify File Sizes
+```bash
+bash(ls -lh {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/)
+```
+
+**Output**: `variants_count × 2` files verified
 
 ## Completion
 
@@ -143,7 +242,8 @@ bash(echo '{style_cards_json}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Setup and input validation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating inputs"},
   {content: "Design space analysis (explore mode)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing design space"},
-  {content: "Style synthesis and file write", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating style cards"}
+  {content: "Design system generation (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating design systems"},
+  {content: "Verify output files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Verifying files"}
 ]});
 ```
 
@@ -156,6 +256,7 @@ Configuration:
 - Extraction Mode: {extraction_mode} (imitate/explore)
 - Input Mode: {input_mode} (image/text/hybrid)
 - Variants: {variants_count}
+- Production-Ready: Complete design systems generated
 
 {IF extraction_mode == "explore":
 Design Space Analysis:
@@ -163,14 +264,19 @@ Design Space Analysis:
 - Min contrast distance: {design_space_analysis.contrast_verification.min_pairwise_distance}
 }
 
-Generated Variants:
-{FOR each card: - {card.name} - {card.design_philosophy}}
+Generated Files:
+{base_path}/style-extraction/
+├── style-1/ (design-tokens.json, style-guide.md)
+├── style-2/ (same structure)
+└── style-{variants_count}/ (same structure)
 
-Output Files:
-- {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json
-{IF extraction_mode == "explore": - {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json}
+{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
+Intermediate Analysis:
+{base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/design-space-analysis.json
+}
 
-Next: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {variants_count}
+Next: /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --session {session_id} --targets "..."
+  OR: /workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id}
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands
@@ -190,13 +296,13 @@ bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/)
 ### Validation Commands
 ```bash
 # Check if already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "exists")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
 
 # Count variants
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -c "\"id\": \"variant-")
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 
-# Validate JSON
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -q "extraction_metadata" && echo "valid")
+# Validate JSON structure
+bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
 ```
 
 ### File Operations
@@ -204,46 +310,50 @@ bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -q "extraction_metadata" && echo "valid")
 # Load brainstorming context
 bash(test -f .brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md && cat it)
 
-# Write output
-bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+# Create directories
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/style-{{1..3}})
 
 # Verify output
-bash(test -f design-space-analysis.json && echo "saved")
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/)
+bash(test -f {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/design-space-analysis.json && echo "saved")
 ```
 
 ## Output Structure
 
 ```
-{base_path}/style-extraction/
-├── style-cards.json              # Complete style variants with token proposals
-└── design-space-analysis.json    # Design directions (explore mode only)
+{base_path}/
+├── .intermediates/                  # Intermediate analysis files
+│   └── style-analysis/
+│       ├── computed-styles.json     # Extracted CSS values from DOM (if URL available)
+│       └── design-space-analysis.json  # Design directions (explore mode only)
+└── style-extraction/                # Final design systems
+    ├── style-1/
+    │   ├── design-tokens.json       # Production-ready design tokens
+    │   └── style-guide.md           # Design philosophy and usage guide
+    ├── style-2/ (same structure)
+    └── style-N/ (same structure)
 ```
 
-## style-cards.json Format
+## design-tokens.json Format
 
 ```json
 {
-  "extraction_metadata": {"session_id": "...", "input_mode": "image|text|hybrid", "extraction_mode": "imitate|explore", "timestamp": "...", "variants_count": N},
-  "style_cards": [
-    {
-      "id": "variant-1", "name": "Style Name", "description": "...",
-      "design_philosophy": "Core principles",
-      "preview": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "background": "oklch(...)", "font_heading": "...", "border_radius": "..."},
-      "proposed_tokens": {
-        "colors": {"brand": {...}, "surface": {...}, "semantic": {...}, "text": {...}, "border": {...}},
-        "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
-        "spacing": {"0": "0", ..., "24": "6rem"},
-        "border_radius": {"none": "0", ..., "full": "9999px"},
-        "shadows": {"sm": "...", ..., "xl": "..."},
-        "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
-      }
-    }
-    // Repeat for all variants
-  ]
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
+    "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
+    "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
+    "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
+    "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
+  },
+  "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
+  "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", ..., "24": "6rem"},
+  "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", ..., "full": "9999px"},
+  "shadows": {"sm": "...", "md": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "..."},
+  "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
 }
 ```
 
-**Requirements**: All colors in OKLCH format, complete token proposals, semantic naming
+**Requirements**: OKLCH colors, complete coverage, semantic naming, WCAG AA compliance
 
 ## Error Handling
 
@@ -261,17 +371,21 @@ ERROR: Claude JSON parsing error
 
 ## Key Features
 
+- **Direct Design System Generation** - Complete design-tokens.json + style-guide.md in one step
+- **Hybrid Extraction Strategy** - Combines computed CSS values (ground truth) with AI visual analysis
+- **Pixel-Perfect Accuracy** - Chrome DevTools extracts exact border-radius, shadows, spacing values
 - **AI-Driven Design Space Exploration** - 6D attribute space analysis for maximum contrast
 - **Variant-Specific Directions** - Each variant has unique philosophy, keywords, anti-patterns
 - **Maximum Contrast Guarantee** - Variants maximally distant in attribute space
-- **Claude-Native** - No external tools, fast deterministic synthesis
-- **Flexible Input** - Images, text, or hybrid mode
-- **Production-Ready** - OKLCH colors, WCAG AA, semantic naming
+- **Flexible Input** - Images, text, URLs, or hybrid mode
+- **Graceful Fallback** - Falls back to pure visual inference if URL unavailable
+- **Production-Ready** - OKLCH colors, WCAG AA compliance, semantic naming
+- **Agent-Driven** - Autonomous multi-file generation with ui-design-agent
 
 ## Integration
 
 **Input**: Reference images or text prompts
-**Output**: `style-cards.json` for consolidation
-**Next**: `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {count}`
+**Output**: `style-extraction/style-{N}/` with design-tokens.json + style-guide.md
+**Next**: `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --session {session_id}` OR `/workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id}`
 
-**Note**: This command only extracts visual style (colors, typography, spacing). For layout structure extraction, use `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract`.
+**Note**: This command extracts visual style (colors, typography, spacing) and generates production-ready design systems. For layout structure extraction, use `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract`.

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/update.md

@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: update
 description: Update brainstorming artifacts with finalized design system references
-usage: /workflow:ui-design:update --session <session_id> [--selected-prototypes "<list>"]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:ui-design:update --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:ui-design:update --session WFS-dashboard --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1"
+argument-hint: --session <session_id> [--selected-prototypes "<list>"]
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -33,13 +30,11 @@ CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files; VALIDATE: session_id matches active ses
 # Verify design artifacts in latest design run
 latest_design = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/WFS-{session}/design-*")
 
-# Detect design system structure (unified vs separate)
-IF exists({latest_design}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json):
-    design_system_mode = "unified"; design_tokens_path = "style-consolidation/design-tokens.json"; style_guide_path = "style-consolidation/style-guide.md"
-ELSE IF exists({latest_design}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json):
-    design_system_mode = "separate"; design_tokens_path = "style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json"; style_guide_path = "style-consolidation/style-1/style-guide.md"
+# Detect design system structure
+IF exists({latest_design}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json):
+    design_system_mode = "separate"; design_tokens_path = "style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json"; style_guide_path = "style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md"
 ELSE:
-    ERROR: "No design tokens found. Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate first"
+    ERROR: "No design tokens found. Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first"
 
 VERIFY: {latest_design}/{design_tokens_path}, {latest_design}/{style_guide_path}, {latest_design}/prototypes/*.html
 
@@ -205,15 +200,15 @@ Next: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
 
 **@ Reference Format** (synthesis-specification.md):
 ```
-@../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
-@../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+@../design-{run_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
+@../design-{run_id}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md
 @../design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
 ```
 
 **@ Reference Format** (ui-designer/style-guide.md):
 ```
-@../../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
-@../../design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+@../../design-{run_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
+@../../design-{run_id}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md
 @../../design-{run_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
 ```
 
@@ -233,8 +228,8 @@ After this update, `/workflow:plan` will discover design assets through:
   "task_id": "IMPL-001",
   "context": {
     "design_system": {
-      "tokens": "design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json",
-      "style_guide": "design-{run_id}/style-consolidation/style-guide.md",
+      "tokens": "design-{run_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json",
+      "style_guide": "design-{run_id}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md",
       "prototypes": ["design-{run_id}/prototypes/dashboard-variant-1.html"]
     }
   }
@@ -243,7 +238,7 @@ After this update, `/workflow:plan` will discover design assets through:
 
 ## Error Handling
 
-- **Missing design artifacts**: Error with message "Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate and /workflow:ui-design:generate first"
+- **Missing design artifacts**: Error with message "Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract and /workflow:ui-design:generate first"
 - **synthesis-specification.md not found**: Warning, create minimal version with just UI/UX Guidelines
 - **ui-designer/ directory missing**: Create directory and file
 - **Edit conflicts**: Preserve existing content, append or replace only UI/UX Guidelines section
@@ -268,7 +263,7 @@ After update, verify:
 
 ## Integration Points
 
-- **Input**: Design system artifacts from `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` and `/workflow:ui-design:generate`
+- **Input**: Design system artifacts from `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` and `/workflow:ui-design:generate`
 - **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/style-guide.md with @ references
 - **Next Phase**: `/workflow:plan` discovers and utilizes design system through @ references
 - **Auto Integration**: Automatically triggered by `/workflow:ui-design:auto` workflow

.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# Classify folders by type for documentation generation
+# Usage: get_modules_by_depth.sh | classify-folders.sh
+# Output: folder_path|folder_type|code:N|dirs:N
+
+while IFS='|' read -r depth_info path_info files_info types_info claude_info; do
+  # Extract folder path from format "path:./src/modules"
+  folder_path=$(echo "$path_info" | cut -d':' -f2-)
+
+  # Skip if path extraction failed
+  [[ -z "$folder_path" || ! -d "$folder_path" ]] && continue
+
+  # Count code files (maxdepth 1)
+  code_files=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type f \
+    \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" \
+       -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.rs" \
+       -o -name "*.c" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.cs" \) \
+    2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+
+  # Count subdirectories
+  subfolders=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type d \
+    -not -path "$folder_path" 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+
+  # Determine folder type
+  if [[ $code_files -gt 0 ]]; then
+    folder_type="code"  # API.md + README.md
+  elif [[ $subfolders -gt 0 ]]; then
+    folder_type="navigation"  # README.md only
+  else
+    folder_type="skip"  # Empty or no relevant content
+  fi
+
+  # Output classification result
+  echo "${folder_path}|${folder_type}|code:${code_files}|dirs:${subfolders}"
+done

.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh

@@ -2,32 +2,88 @@
 # Detect modules affected by git changes or recent modifications
 # Usage: detect_changed_modules.sh [format]
 #   format: list|grouped|paths (default: paths)
+#
+# Features:
+# - Respects .gitignore patterns (current directory or git root)
+# - Detects git changes (staged, unstaged, or last commit)
+# - Falls back to recently modified files (last 24 hours)
+
+# Build exclusion filters from .gitignore
+build_exclusion_filters() {
+    local filters=""
+
+    # Common system/cache directories to exclude
+    local system_excludes=(
+        ".git" "__pycache__" "node_modules" ".venv" "venv" "env"
+        "dist" "build" ".cache" ".pytest_cache" ".mypy_cache"
+        "coverage" ".nyc_output" "logs" "tmp" "temp"
+    )
+
+    for exclude in "${system_excludes[@]}"; do
+        filters+=" -not -path '*/$exclude' -not -path '*/$exclude/*'"
+    done
+
+    # Find and parse .gitignore (current dir first, then git root)
+    local gitignore_file=""
+
+    # Check current directory first
+    if [ -f ".gitignore" ]; then
+        gitignore_file=".gitignore"
+    else
+        # Try to find git root and check for .gitignore there
+        local git_root=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
+        if [ -n "$git_root" ] && [ -f "$git_root/.gitignore" ]; then
+            gitignore_file="$git_root/.gitignore"
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Parse .gitignore if found
+    if [ -n "$gitignore_file" ]; then
+        while IFS= read -r line; do
+            # Skip empty lines and comments
+            [[ -z "$line" || "$line" =~ ^[[:space:]]*# ]] && continue
+
+            # Remove trailing slash and whitespace
+            line=$(echo "$line" | sed 's|/$||' | xargs)
+
+            # Skip wildcards patterns (too complex for simple find)
+            [[ "$line" =~ \* ]] && continue
+
+            # Add to filters
+            filters+=" -not -path '*/$line' -not -path '*/$line/*'"
+        done < "$gitignore_file"
+    fi
+
+    echo "$filters"
+}
 
 detect_changed_modules() {
     local format="${1:-paths}"
     local changed_files=""
     local affected_dirs=""
-    
+    local exclusion_filters=$(build_exclusion_filters)
+
     # Step 1: Try to get git changes (staged + unstaged)
     if git rev-parse --git-dir > /dev/null 2>&1; then
         changed_files=$(git diff --name-only HEAD 2>/dev/null; git diff --name-only --cached 2>/dev/null)
-        
+
         # If no changes in working directory, check last commit
         if [ -z "$changed_files" ]; then
             changed_files=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD 2>/dev/null)
         fi
     fi
-    
+
     # Step 2: If no git changes, find recently modified source files (last 24 hours)
+    # Apply exclusion filters from .gitignore
     if [ -z "$changed_files" ]; then
-        changed_files=$(find . -type f \( \
-            -name "*.md" -o \
-            -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.tsx" -o \
-            -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" -o \
-            -name "*.java" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.c" -o -name "*.h" -o \
-            -name "*.sh" -o -name "*.ps1" -o \
-            -name "*.json" -o -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" \
-        \) -not -path '*/.*' -mtime -1 2>/dev/null)
+        changed_files=$(eval "find . -type f \( \
+            -name '*.md' -o \
+            -name '*.js' -o -name '*.ts' -o -name '*.jsx' -o -name '*.tsx' -o \
+            -name '*.py' -o -name '*.go' -o -name '*.rs' -o \
+            -name '*.java' -o -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.c' -o -name '*.h' -o \
+            -name '*.sh' -o -name '*.ps1' -o \
+            -name '*.json' -o -name '*.yaml' -o -name '*.yml' \
+        \) $exclusion_filters -mtime -1 2>/dev/null")
     fi
     
     # Step 3: Extract unique parent directories

.claude/scripts/extract-computed-styles.js

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/**
+ * Extract Computed Styles from DOM
+ *
+ * This script extracts real CSS computed styles from a webpage's DOM
+ * to provide accurate design tokens for UI replication.
+ *
+ * Usage: Execute this function via Chrome DevTools evaluate_script
+ */
+
+(() => {
+  /**
+   * Extract unique values from a set and sort them
+   */
+  const uniqueSorted = (set) => {
+    return Array.from(set)
+      .filter(v => v && v !== 'none' && v !== '0px' && v !== 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)')
+      .sort();
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Parse rgb/rgba to OKLCH format (placeholder - returns original for now)
+   */
+  const toOKLCH = (color) => {
+    // TODO: Implement actual RGB to OKLCH conversion
+    // For now, return the original color with a note
+    return `${color} /* TODO: Convert to OKLCH */`;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Extract only key styles from an element
+   */
+  const extractKeyStyles = (element) => {
+    const s = window.getComputedStyle(element);
+    return {
+      color: s.color,
+      bg: s.backgroundColor,
+      borderRadius: s.borderRadius,
+      boxShadow: s.boxShadow,
+      fontSize: s.fontSize,
+      fontWeight: s.fontWeight,
+      padding: s.padding,
+      margin: s.margin
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Main extraction function - extract all critical design tokens
+   */
+  const extractDesignTokens = () => {
+    // Include all key UI elements
+    const selectors = [
+      'button', '.btn', '[role="button"]',
+      'input', 'textarea', 'select',
+      'h1', 'h2', 'h3', 'h4', 'h5', 'h6',
+      '.card', 'article', 'section',
+      'a', 'p', 'nav', 'header', 'footer'
+    ];
+
+    // Collect all design tokens
+    const tokens = {
+      colors: new Set(),
+      borderRadii: new Set(),
+      shadows: new Set(),
+      fontSizes: new Set(),
+      fontWeights: new Set(),
+      spacing: new Set()
+    };
+
+    // Extract from all elements
+    selectors.forEach(selector => {
+      try {
+        const elements = document.querySelectorAll(selector);
+        elements.forEach(element => {
+          const s = extractKeyStyles(element);
+
+          // Collect all tokens (no limits)
+          if (s.color && s.color !== 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)') tokens.colors.add(s.color);
+          if (s.bg && s.bg !== 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)') tokens.colors.add(s.bg);
+          if (s.borderRadius && s.borderRadius !== '0px') tokens.borderRadii.add(s.borderRadius);
+          if (s.boxShadow && s.boxShadow !== 'none') tokens.shadows.add(s.boxShadow);
+          if (s.fontSize) tokens.fontSizes.add(s.fontSize);
+          if (s.fontWeight) tokens.fontWeights.add(s.fontWeight);
+
+          // Extract all spacing values
+          [s.padding, s.margin].forEach(val => {
+            if (val && val !== '0px') {
+              val.split(' ').forEach(v => {
+                if (v && v !== '0px') tokens.spacing.add(v);
+              });
+            }
+          });
+        });
+      } catch (e) {
+        console.warn(`Error: ${selector}`, e);
+      }
+    });
+
+    // Return all tokens (no element details to save context)
+    return {
+      metadata: {
+        extractedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
+        url: window.location.href,
+        method: 'computed-styles'
+      },
+      tokens: {
+        colors: uniqueSorted(tokens.colors),
+        borderRadii: uniqueSorted(tokens.borderRadii),  // ALL radius values
+        shadows: uniqueSorted(tokens.shadows),          // ALL shadows
+        fontSizes: uniqueSorted(tokens.fontSizes),
+        fontWeights: uniqueSorted(tokens.fontWeights),
+        spacing: uniqueSorted(tokens.spacing)
+      }
+    };
+  };
+
+  // Execute and return results
+  return extractDesignTokens();
+})();

.claude/scripts/extract-layout-structure.js

@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/**
+ * Extract Layout Structure from DOM
+ *
+ * Extracts real layout information from DOM to provide accurate
+ * structural data for UI replication.
+ *
+ * Usage: Execute via Chrome DevTools evaluate_script
+ */
+
+(() => {
+  /**
+   * Get element's bounding box relative to viewport
+   */
+  const getBounds = (element) => {
+    const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect();
+    return {
+      x: Math.round(rect.x),
+      y: Math.round(rect.y),
+      width: Math.round(rect.width),
+      height: Math.round(rect.height)
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Extract layout properties from an element
+   */
+  const extractLayoutProps = (element) => {
+    const s = window.getComputedStyle(element);
+
+    return {
+      // Core layout
+      display: s.display,
+      position: s.position,
+
+      // Flexbox
+      flexDirection: s.flexDirection,
+      justifyContent: s.justifyContent,
+      alignItems: s.alignItems,
+      flexWrap: s.flexWrap,
+      gap: s.gap,
+
+      // Grid
+      gridTemplateColumns: s.gridTemplateColumns,
+      gridTemplateRows: s.gridTemplateRows,
+      gridAutoFlow: s.gridAutoFlow,
+
+      // Dimensions
+      width: s.width,
+      height: s.height,
+      maxWidth: s.maxWidth,
+      minWidth: s.minWidth,
+
+      // Spacing
+      padding: s.padding,
+      margin: s.margin
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Identify layout pattern for an element
+   */
+  const identifyPattern = (props) => {
+    const { display, flexDirection, gridTemplateColumns } = props;
+
+    if (display === 'flex') {
+      if (flexDirection === 'column') return 'flex-column';
+      if (flexDirection === 'row') return 'flex-row';
+      return 'flex';
+    }
+
+    if (display === 'grid') {
+      const cols = gridTemplateColumns;
+      if (cols && cols !== 'none') {
+        const colCount = cols.split(' ').length;
+        return `grid-${colCount}col`;
+      }
+      return 'grid';
+    }
+
+    if (display === 'inline-flex') return 'inline-flex';
+    if (display === 'block') return 'block';
+
+    return display;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Build layout tree recursively
+   */
+  const buildLayoutTree = (element, depth = 0, maxDepth = 3) => {
+    if (depth > maxDepth) return null;
+
+    const props = extractLayoutProps(element);
+    const bounds = getBounds(element);
+    const pattern = identifyPattern(props);
+
+    // Get semantic role
+    const tagName = element.tagName.toLowerCase();
+    const classes = Array.from(element.classList).slice(0, 3); // Max 3 classes
+    const role = element.getAttribute('role');
+
+    // Build node
+    const node = {
+      tag: tagName,
+      classes: classes,
+      role: role,
+      pattern: pattern,
+      bounds: bounds,
+      layout: {
+        display: props.display,
+        position: props.position
+      }
+    };
+
+    // Add flex/grid specific properties
+    if (props.display === 'flex' || props.display === 'inline-flex') {
+      node.layout.flexDirection = props.flexDirection;
+      node.layout.justifyContent = props.justifyContent;
+      node.layout.alignItems = props.alignItems;
+      node.layout.gap = props.gap;
+    }
+
+    if (props.display === 'grid') {
+      node.layout.gridTemplateColumns = props.gridTemplateColumns;
+      node.layout.gridTemplateRows = props.gridTemplateRows;
+      node.layout.gap = props.gap;
+    }
+
+    // Process children for container elements
+    if (props.display === 'flex' || props.display === 'grid' || props.display === 'block') {
+      const children = Array.from(element.children);
+      if (children.length > 0 && children.length < 50) { // Limit to 50 children
+        node.children = children
+          .map(child => buildLayoutTree(child, depth + 1, maxDepth))
+          .filter(child => child !== null);
+      }
+    }
+
+    return node;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Find main layout containers
+   */
+  const findMainContainers = () => {
+    const selectors = [
+      'body > header',
+      'body > nav',
+      'body > main',
+      'body > footer',
+      '[role="banner"]',
+      '[role="navigation"]',
+      '[role="main"]',
+      '[role="contentinfo"]'
+    ];
+
+    const containers = [];
+
+    selectors.forEach(selector => {
+      const element = document.querySelector(selector);
+      if (element) {
+        const tree = buildLayoutTree(element, 0, 3);
+        if (tree) {
+          containers.push(tree);
+        }
+      }
+    });
+
+    return containers;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Analyze layout patterns
+   */
+  const analyzePatterns = (containers) => {
+    const patterns = {
+      flexColumn: 0,
+      flexRow: 0,
+      grid: 0,
+      sticky: 0,
+      fixed: 0
+    };
+
+    const analyze = (node) => {
+      if (!node) return;
+
+      if (node.pattern === 'flex-column') patterns.flexColumn++;
+      if (node.pattern === 'flex-row') patterns.flexRow++;
+      if (node.pattern && node.pattern.startsWith('grid')) patterns.grid++;
+      if (node.layout.position === 'sticky') patterns.sticky++;
+      if (node.layout.position === 'fixed') patterns.fixed++;
+
+      if (node.children) {
+        node.children.forEach(analyze);
+      }
+    };
+
+    containers.forEach(analyze);
+    return patterns;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Main extraction function
+   */
+  const extractLayout = () => {
+    const containers = findMainContainers();
+    const patterns = analyzePatterns(containers);
+
+    return {
+      metadata: {
+        extractedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
+        url: window.location.href,
+        method: 'layout-structure'
+      },
+      patterns: patterns,
+      structure: containers
+    };
+  };
+
+  // Execute and return results
+  return extractLayout();
+})();

.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper

@@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ GREEN='\033[0;32m'
 YELLOW='\033[1;33m'
 NC='\033[0m' # No Color
 
+# Respect custom Gemini base URL
+if [[ -n "$GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL" ]]; then
+    echo -e "${GREEN}🌐 Using custom Gemini base URL: $GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL${NC}" >&2
+    export GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL
+fi
+
 # Function to count tokens (approximate: chars/4) - optimized version
 count_tokens() {
     local total_chars=0

.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ build_exclusion_filters() {
 
         # OS and editor files
         ".DS_Store" "Thumbs.db" "desktop.ini"
-        "*.stackdump" "core" "*.core"
+        "*.stackdump" "*.core"
 
         # Cloud and deployment
         ".serverless" ".terraform" "terraform.tfstate"

.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh

@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ for style in $styles; do
 ### Style ${style}
 
 EOF3
-    style_guide="../style-consolidation/style-${style}/style-guide.md"
+    style_guide="../style-extraction/style-${style}/style-guide.md"
     if [[ -f "$style_guide" ]]; then
         head -n 10 "$style_guide" | tail -n +2 >> PREVIEW.md 2>/dev/null || echo "Design philosophy and tokens" >> PREVIEW.md
     else

.claude/scripts/ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ auto_detect_pages() {
 # Auto-detect style variants count
 auto_detect_style_variants() {
     local base_path="$1"
-    local style_dir="$base_path/../style-consolidation"
+    local style_dir="$base_path/../style-extraction"
 
     if [ ! -d "$style_dir" ]; then
         log_warning "Style consolidation directory not found: $style_dir"
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ fi
 
 # Validate STYLE_VARIANTS against actual style directories
 if [ "$STYLE_VARIANTS" -gt 0 ]; then
-    style_dir="$BASE_PATH/../style-consolidation"
+    style_dir="$BASE_PATH/../style-extraction"
 
     if [ ! -d "$style_dir" ]; then
         log_error "Style consolidation directory not found: $style_dir"
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ for page in "${PAGE_ARRAY[@]}"; do
             # Define file paths
             TEMPLATE_HTML="_templates/${page}-layout-${l}.html"
             STRUCTURAL_CSS="_templates/${page}-layout-${l}.css"
-            TOKEN_CSS="../style-consolidation/style-${s}/tokens.css"
+            TOKEN_CSS="../style-extraction/style-${s}/tokens.css"
             OUTPUT_HTML="${page}-style-${s}-layout-${l}.html"
 
             # Copy template and replace placeholders
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ across all style variants. The HTML structure is identical for all ${page}-layou
 prototypes, with only the design tokens (colors, fonts, spacing) varying.
 
 ## Design System Reference
-Refer to \`../style-consolidation/style-${s}/style-guide.md\` for:
+Refer to \`../style-extraction/style-${s}/style-guide.md\` for:
 - Design philosophy
 - Token usage guidelines
 - Component patterns
@@ -742,9 +742,9 @@ for s in $(seq 1 "$STYLE_VARIANTS"); do
     cat >> PREVIEW.md <<STYLEEOF
 
 ### Style ${s}
-- **Tokens:** \`../style-consolidation/style-${s}/design-tokens.json\`
-- **CSS Variables:** \`../style-consolidation/style-${s}/tokens.css\`
-- **Style Guide:** \`../style-consolidation/style-${s}/style-guide.md\`
+- **Tokens:** \`../style-extraction/style-${s}/design-tokens.json\`
+- **CSS Variables:** \`../style-extraction/style-${s}/tokens.css\`
+- **Style Guide:** \`../style-extraction/style-${s}/style-guide.md\`
 STYLEEOF
 done
 

.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh

@@ -1,72 +1,101 @@
 #!/bin/bash
-# Update CLAUDE.md for a specific module with automatic layer detection
+# Update CLAUDE.md for a specific module with unified template
 # Usage: update_module_claude.sh <module_path> [update_type] [tool]
 #   module_path: Path to the module directory
 #   update_type: full|related (default: full)
 #   tool: gemini|qwen|codex (default: gemini)
-#   Script automatically detects layer depth and selects appropriate template
+#
+# Features:
+# - Respects .gitignore patterns (current directory or git root)
+# - Unified template for all modules (folders and files)
+# - Template-based documentation generation
+
+# Build exclusion filters from .gitignore
+build_exclusion_filters() {
+    local filters=""
+
+    # Common system/cache directories to exclude
+    local system_excludes=(
+        ".git" "__pycache__" "node_modules" ".venv" "venv" "env"
+        "dist" "build" ".cache" ".pytest_cache" ".mypy_cache"
+        "coverage" ".nyc_output" "logs" "tmp" "temp"
+    )
+
+    for exclude in "${system_excludes[@]}"; do
+        filters+=" -not -path '*/$exclude' -not -path '*/$exclude/*'"
+    done
+
+    # Find and parse .gitignore (current dir first, then git root)
+    local gitignore_file=""
+
+    # Check current directory first
+    if [ -f ".gitignore" ]; then
+        gitignore_file=".gitignore"
+    else
+        # Try to find git root and check for .gitignore there
+        local git_root=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
+        if [ -n "$git_root" ] && [ -f "$git_root/.gitignore" ]; then
+            gitignore_file="$git_root/.gitignore"
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Parse .gitignore if found
+    if [ -n "$gitignore_file" ]; then
+        while IFS= read -r line; do
+            # Skip empty lines and comments
+            [[ -z "$line" || "$line" =~ ^[[:space:]]*# ]] && continue
+
+            # Remove trailing slash and whitespace
+            line=$(echo "$line" | sed 's|/$||' | xargs)
+
+            # Skip wildcards patterns (too complex for simple find)
+            [[ "$line" =~ \* ]] && continue
+
+            # Add to filters
+            filters+=" -not -path '*/$line' -not -path '*/$line/*'"
+        done < "$gitignore_file"
+    fi
+
+    echo "$filters"
+}
 
 update_module_claude() {
     local module_path="$1"
     local update_type="${2:-full}"
     local tool="${3:-gemini}"
-    
+
     # Validate parameters
     if [ -z "$module_path" ]; then
         echo "❌ Error: Module path is required"
         echo "Usage: update_module_claude.sh <module_path> [update_type]"
         return 1
     fi
-    
+
     if [ ! -d "$module_path" ]; then
         echo "❌ Error: Directory '$module_path' does not exist"
         return 1
     fi
-    
-    # Check if directory has files
-    local file_count=$(find "$module_path" -maxdepth 1 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+
+    # Build exclusion filters from .gitignore
+    local exclusion_filters=$(build_exclusion_filters)
+
+    # Check if directory has files (excluding gitignored paths)
+    local file_count=$(eval "find \"$module_path\" -maxdepth 1 -type f $exclusion_filters 2>/dev/null" | wc -l)
     if [ $file_count -eq 0 ]; then
-        echo "⚠️  Skipping '$module_path' - no files found"
+        echo "⚠️  Skipping '$module_path' - no files found (after .gitignore filtering)"
         return 0
     fi
     
-    # Determine documentation layer based on path patterns
-    local layer=""
-    local template_path=""
-    local analysis_strategy=""
-    
-    # Clean path for pattern matching
-    local clean_path=$(echo "$module_path" | sed 's|^\./||')
-    
-    # Pattern-based layer detection
-    if [ "$module_path" = "." ]; then
-        # Root directory
-        layer="Layer 1 (Root)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer1-root.txt"
-        analysis_strategy="--all-files"
-    elif [[ "$clean_path" =~ ^[^/]+$ ]]; then
-        # Top-level directories (e.g., .claude, src, tests)
-        layer="Layer 2 (Domain)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer2-domain.txt"
-        analysis_strategy="@{*/CLAUDE.md}"
-    elif [[ "$clean_path" =~ ^[^/]+/[^/]+$ ]]; then
-        # Second-level directories (e.g., .claude/scripts, src/components)
-        layer="Layer 3 (Module)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer3-module.txt"
-        analysis_strategy="@{*/CLAUDE.md}"
-    else
-        # Deeper directories (e.g., .claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts)
-        layer="Layer 4 (Sub-Module)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer4-submodule.txt"
-        analysis_strategy="--all-files"
-    fi
+    # Use unified template for all modules
+    local template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-module-unified.txt"
+    local analysis_strategy="--all-files"
     
     # Prepare logging info
     local module_name=$(basename "$module_path")
 
     echo "⚡ Updating: $module_path"
-    echo "   Layer: $layer | Type: $update_type | Tool: $tool | Files: $file_count"
-    echo "   Template: $(basename "$template_path") | Strategy: $analysis_strategy"
+    echo "   Type: $update_type | Tool: $tool | Files: $file_count"
+    echo "   Template: $(basename "$template_path")"
     
     # Generate prompt with template injection
     local template_content=""
@@ -74,7 +103,7 @@ update_module_claude() {
         template_content=$(cat "$template_path")
     else
         echo "   ⚠️  Template not found: $template_path, using fallback"
-        template_content="Update CLAUDE.md documentation for this module following hierarchy standards."
+        template_content="Update CLAUDE.md documentation for this module: document structure, key components, dependencies, and integration points."
     fi
     
     local update_context=""
@@ -82,8 +111,7 @@ update_module_claude() {
         update_context="
         Update Mode: Complete refresh
         - Perform comprehensive analysis of all content
-        - Document patterns, architecture, and purpose
-        - Consider existing documentation hierarchy
+        - Document module structure, dependencies, and key components
         - Follow template guidelines strictly"
     else
         update_context="
@@ -96,13 +124,13 @@ update_module_claude() {
     
     local base_prompt="
     ⚠️ CRITICAL RULES - MUST FOLLOW:
-    1. ONLY modify CLAUDE.md files at any hierarchy level
+    1. ONLY modify CLAUDE.md files
     2. NEVER modify source code files
     3. Focus exclusively on updating documentation
     4. Follow the template guidelines exactly
-    
+
     $template_content
-    
+
     $update_context"
     
     # Execute update
@@ -116,38 +144,21 @@ update_module_claude() {
         Module Information:
         - Name: $module_name
         - Path: $module_path
-        - Layer: $layer
-        - Tool: $tool
-        - Analysis Strategy: $analysis_strategy"
+        - Tool: $tool"
 
-        # Execute with selected tool
+        # Execute with selected tool (always use --all-files)
         case "$tool" in
             qwen)
-                if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
-                    qwen --all-files --yolo -p "$final_prompt" 2>&1
-                    tool_result=$?
-                else
-                    qwen --yolo -p "$analysis_strategy $final_prompt" 2>&1
-                    tool_result=$?
-                fi
+                qwen --all-files --yolo -p "$final_prompt" 2>&1
+                tool_result=$?
                 ;;
             codex)
-                if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
-                    codex --full-auto exec "$final_prompt" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access 2>&1
-                    tool_result=$?
-                else
-                    codex --full-auto exec "$final_prompt CONTEXT: $analysis_strategy" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access 2>&1
-                    tool_result=$?
-                fi
+                codex --full-auto exec "$final_prompt" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access 2>&1
+                tool_result=$?
                 ;;
             gemini|*)
-                if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
-                    gemini --all-files --yolo -p "$final_prompt" 2>&1
-                    tool_result=$?
-                else
-                    gemini --yolo -p "$analysis_strategy $final_prompt" 2>&1
-                    tool_result=$?
-                fi
+                gemini --all-files --yolo -p "$final_prompt" 2>&1
+                tool_result=$?
                 ;;
         esac
 

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt

@@ -1,16 +1,29 @@
-Analyze system architecture and design decisions:
+Analyze system architecture and design decisions.
 
-## Required Analysis:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Analyze system-wide structure, not just isolated components
+□ Provide file:line references for key architectural elements
+□ Distinguish between intended design and actual implementation
+□ Apply RULES template requirements exactly as specified
+
+## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
 1. Identify main architectural patterns and design principles
 2. Map module dependencies and component relationships
 3. Assess integration points and data flow patterns
 4. Evaluate scalability and maintainability aspects
 5. Document architectural trade-offs and design decisions
 
-## Output Requirements:
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
 - Architectural diagrams or textual descriptions
 - Dependency mapping with specific file references
 - Integration point documentation with examples
 - Scalability assessment and bottleneck identification
+- Prioritized recommendations for architectural improvement
 
-Focus on high-level design patterns and system-wide architectural concerns.
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ All major components and their relationships analyzed
+□ Key architectural decisions and trade-offs are documented
+□ Data flow and integration points are clearly mapped
+□ Scalability and maintainability findings are supported by evidence
+
+Focus: High-level design patterns and system-wide architectural concerns.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt

@@ -1,16 +1,28 @@
-Analyze implementation patterns and code structure:
+Analyze implementation patterns and code structure.
 
-## Required Analysis:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Analyze ALL files in CONTEXT (not just samples)
+□ Provide file:line references for every pattern identified
+□ Distinguish between good patterns and anti-patterns
+□ Apply RULES template requirements exactly as specified
+
+## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
 1. Identify common code patterns and architectural decisions
 2. Extract reusable utilities and shared components
 3. Document existing conventions and coding standards
 4. Assess pattern consistency and identify anti-patterns
 5. Suggest improvements and optimization opportunities
 
-## Output Requirements:
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
 - Specific file:line references for all findings
 - Code snippets demonstrating identified patterns
 - Clear recommendations for pattern improvements
-- Standards compliance assessment
+- Standards compliance assessment with priority levels
 
-Focus on actionable insights and concrete implementation guidance.
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ All CONTEXT files analyzed (not partial coverage)
+□ Every pattern backed by code reference (file:line)
+□ Anti-patterns clearly distinguished from good patterns
+□ Recommendations prioritized by impact
+
+Focus: Actionable insights with concrete implementation guidance.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/performance.txt

@@ -1,16 +1,29 @@
-Analyze performance characteristics and optimization opportunities:
+Analyze performance characteristics and optimization opportunities.
 
-## Required Analysis:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Focus on measurable metrics (e.g., latency, memory, CPU usage)
+□ Provide file:line references for all identified bottlenecks
+□ Distinguish between algorithmic and resource-based issues
+□ Apply RULES template requirements exactly as specified
+
+## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
 1. Identify performance bottlenecks and resource usage patterns
 2. Assess algorithm efficiency and data structure choices
 3. Evaluate caching strategies and optimization techniques
 4. Review memory management and resource cleanup
 5. Document performance metrics and improvement opportunities
 
-## Output Requirements:
-- Performance bottleneck identification with specific locations
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
+- Performance bottleneck identification with specific file:line locations
 - Algorithm complexity analysis and optimization suggestions
 - Caching pattern documentation and recommendations
 - Memory usage patterns and optimization opportunities
+- Prioritized list of performance improvements
 
-Focus on measurable performance improvements and concrete optimization strategies.
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ All CONTEXT files analyzed for performance characteristics
+□ Every bottleneck is backed by a code reference (file:line)
+□ Both algorithmic and resource-related issues are covered
+□ Recommendations are prioritized by potential impact
+
+Focus: Measurable performance improvements and concrete optimization strategies.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/quality.txt

@@ -1,16 +1,29 @@
-Analyze code quality and maintainability aspects:
+Analyze code quality and maintainability aspects.
 
-## Required Analysis:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Analyze against the project's established coding standards
+□ Provide file:line references for all quality issues
+□ Assess both implementation code and test coverage
+□ Apply RULES template requirements exactly as specified
+
+## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
 1. Assess code organization and structural quality
 2. Evaluate naming conventions and readability standards
 3. Review error handling and logging practices
 4. Analyze test coverage and testing strategies
 5. Document technical debt and improvement priorities
 
-## Output Requirements:
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
 - Code quality metrics and specific improvement areas
 - Naming convention consistency analysis
-- Error handling pattern documentation
+- Error handling and logging pattern documentation
 - Test coverage assessment with gap identification
+- Prioritized list of technical debt to address
 
-Focus on maintainability improvements and long-term code health.
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ All CONTEXT files analyzed for code quality
+□ Every finding is backed by a code reference (file:line)
+□ Both code and test quality have been evaluated
+□ Recommendations are prioritized by impact on maintainability
+
+Focus: Maintainability improvements and long-term code health.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/security.txt

@@ -1,16 +1,29 @@
-Analyze security implementation and potential vulnerabilities:
+Analyze security implementation and potential vulnerabilities.
 
-## Required Analysis:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Identify all data entry points and external system interfaces
+□ Provide file:line references for all potential vulnerabilities
+□ Classify risks by severity and type (e.g., OWASP Top 10)
+□ Apply RULES template requirements exactly as specified
+
+## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
 1. Identify authentication and authorization mechanisms
 2. Assess input validation and sanitization practices
 3. Review data encryption and secure storage methods
 4. Evaluate API security and access control patterns
 5. Document security risks and compliance considerations
 
-## Output Requirements:
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
 - Security vulnerability findings with file:line references
 - Authentication/authorization pattern documentation
-- Input validation examples and gaps
+- Input validation examples and identified gaps
 - Encryption usage patterns and recommendations
+- Prioritized remediation plan based on risk level
 
-Focus on identifying security gaps and providing actionable remediation steps.
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ All CONTEXT files analyzed for security vulnerabilities
+□ Every finding is backed by a code reference (file:line)
+□ Both authentication and data handling are covered
+□ Recommendations include clear, actionable remediation steps
+
+Focus: Identifying security gaps and providing actionable remediation steps.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/component.txt

@@ -1,37 +1,55 @@
-You are tasked with creating a reusable component in this codebase. Follow these guidelines:
+Create a reusable component following project conventions and best practices.
 
-## Design Phase:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Analyze existing component patterns BEFORE implementing
+□ Follow established naming conventions and prop patterns
+□ Include comprehensive tests (unit + visual + accessibility)
+□ Provide complete TypeScript types and documentation
+
+## IMPLEMENTATION PHASES
+
+### Design Phase
 1. Analyze existing component patterns and structures
 2. Identify reusable design principles and styling approaches
 3. Review component hierarchy and prop patterns
 4. Study existing component documentation and usage
 
-## Development Phase:
+### Development Phase
 1. Create component with proper TypeScript interfaces
 2. Implement following established naming conventions
 3. Add appropriate default props and validation
 4. Include comprehensive prop documentation
 
-## Styling Phase:
+### Styling Phase
 1. Follow existing styling methodology (CSS modules, styled-components, etc.)
 2. Ensure responsive design principles
 3. Add proper theming support if applicable
 4. Include accessibility considerations (ARIA, keyboard navigation)
 
-## Testing Phase:
+### Testing Phase
 1. Write component tests covering all props and states
 2. Test accessibility compliance
 3. Add visual regression tests if applicable
 4. Test component in different contexts and layouts
 
-## Documentation Phase:
+### Documentation Phase
 1. Create usage examples and code snippets
 2. Document all props and their purposes
 3. Include accessibility guidelines
 4. Add integration examples with other components
 
-## Output Requirements:
-- Provide complete component implementation
-- Include comprehensive TypeScript types
-- Show usage examples and integration patterns
-- Document component API and best practices
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
+- Complete component implementation with TypeScript types
+- Usage examples and integration patterns
+- Component API documentation and best practices
+- Test suite with accessibility validation
+- File:line references for pattern sources
+
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ Implementation follows existing component patterns
+□ Complete TypeScript types and prop documentation
+□ Comprehensive tests (unit + visual + accessibility)
+□ Accessibility compliance (ARIA, keyboard navigation)
+□ Usage examples and integration documented
+
+Focus: Production-ready reusable component with comprehensive documentation and testing.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/debugging.txt

@@ -1,37 +1,55 @@
-You are tasked with debugging and resolving issues in this codebase. Follow these systematic guidelines:
+Debug and resolve issues systematically in the codebase.
 
-## Issue Analysis Phase:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Identify and reproduce the issue completely before fixing
+□ Perform root cause analysis (not just symptom treatment)
+□ Provide file:line references for all changes
+□ Add tests to prevent regression of this specific issue
+
+## IMPLEMENTATION PHASES
+
+### Issue Analysis Phase
 1. Identify and reproduce the reported issue
 2. Analyze error logs and stack traces
 3. Study code flow and identify potential failure points
 4. Review recent changes that might have introduced the issue
 
-## Investigation Phase:
+### Investigation Phase
 1. Add strategic logging and debugging statements
 2. Use debugging tools and profilers as appropriate
 3. Test with different input conditions and edge cases
 4. Isolate the root cause through systematic elimination
 
-## Root Cause Analysis:
+### Root Cause Analysis
 1. Document the exact cause of the issue
 2. Identify contributing factors and conditions
 3. Assess impact scope and affected functionality
 4. Determine if similar issues exist elsewhere
 
-## Resolution Phase:
+### Resolution Phase
 1. Implement minimal, targeted fix for the root cause
 2. Ensure fix doesn't introduce new issues or regressions
 3. Add proper error handling and validation
 4. Include defensive programming measures
 
-## Prevention Phase:
+### Prevention Phase
 1. Add tests to prevent regression of this issue
 2. Improve error messages and logging
 3. Add monitoring or alerts for early detection
 4. Document lessons learned and prevention strategies
 
-## Output Requirements:
-- Provide detailed root cause analysis
-- Show exact code changes made to resolve the issue
-- Include new tests added to prevent regression
-- Document debugging process and lessons learned
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
+- Detailed root cause analysis with file:line references
+- Exact code changes made to resolve the issue
+- New tests added to prevent regression
+- Debugging process documentation and lessons learned
+- Impact assessment and affected functionality
+
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ Root cause identified and documented (not just symptoms)
+□ Minimal fix applied without introducing new issues
+□ Tests added to prevent this specific regression
+□ Similar issues checked and addressed if found
+□ Prevention measures documented
+
+Focus: Systematic root cause resolution with regression prevention.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt

@@ -1,31 +1,49 @@
-You are tasked with implementing a new feature in this codebase. Follow these guidelines:
+Implement a new feature following project conventions and best practices.
 
-## Analysis Phase:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Study existing code patterns BEFORE implementing
+□ Follow established project conventions and architecture
+□ Include comprehensive tests (unit + integration)
+□ Provide file:line references for all changes
+
+## IMPLEMENTATION PHASES
+
+### Analysis Phase
 1. Study existing code patterns and conventions
 2. Identify similar features and their implementation approaches
 3. Review project architecture and design principles
 4. Understand dependencies and integration points
 
-## Implementation Phase:
+### Implementation Phase
 1. Create feature following established patterns
 2. Implement with proper error handling and validation
 3. Add comprehensive logging for debugging
 4. Follow security best practices
 
-## Integration Phase:
+### Integration Phase
 1. Ensure seamless integration with existing systems
 2. Update configuration files as needed
 3. Add proper TypeScript types and interfaces
 4. Update documentation and comments
 
-## Testing Phase:
+### Testing Phase
 1. Write unit tests covering edge cases
 2. Add integration tests for feature workflows
 3. Verify error scenarios are properly handled
 4. Test performance and security implications
 
-## Output Requirements:
-- Provide file:line references for all changes
-- Include code examples demonstrating key patterns
-- Explain architectural decisions made
-- Document any new dependencies or configurations
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
+- File:line references for all changes
+- Code examples demonstrating key patterns
+- Explanation of architectural decisions made
+- Documentation of new dependencies or configurations
+- Test coverage summary
+
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ Implementation follows existing patterns (no divergence)
+□ Complete test coverage (unit + integration)
+□ Documentation updated (code comments + external docs)
+□ Integration verified (no breaking changes)
+□ Security and performance validated
+
+Focus: Production-ready implementation with comprehensive testing and documentation.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/refactor.txt

@@ -1,37 +1,55 @@
-You are tasked with refactoring existing code to improve quality, performance, or maintainability. Follow these guidelines:
+Refactor existing code to improve quality, performance, or maintainability.
 
-## Analysis Phase:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Preserve existing functionality (no behavioral changes unless specified)
+□ Ensure all existing tests continue to pass
+□ Plan incremental changes (avoid big-bang refactoring)
+□ Provide file:line references for all modifications
+
+## IMPLEMENTATION PHASES
+
+### Analysis Phase
 1. Identify code smells and technical debt
 2. Analyze performance bottlenecks and inefficiencies
 3. Review code complexity and maintainability metrics
 4. Study existing test coverage and identify gaps
 
-## Planning Phase:
+### Planning Phase
 1. Create refactoring strategy preserving existing functionality
 2. Identify breaking changes and migration paths
 3. Plan incremental refactoring steps
 4. Consider backward compatibility requirements
 
-## Refactoring Phase:
+### Refactoring Phase
 1. Apply SOLID principles and design patterns
 2. Improve code readability and documentation
 3. Optimize performance while maintaining functionality
 4. Reduce code duplication and improve reusability
 
-## Validation Phase:
+### Validation Phase
 1. Ensure all existing tests continue to pass
 2. Add new tests for improved code coverage
 3. Verify performance improvements with benchmarks
 4. Test edge cases and error scenarios
 
-## Migration Phase:
+### Migration Phase
 1. Update dependent code to use refactored interfaces
 2. Update documentation and usage examples
 3. Provide migration guides for breaking changes
 4. Add deprecation warnings for old interfaces
 
-## Output Requirements:
-- Provide before/after code comparisons
-- Document performance improvements achieved
-- Include migration instructions for breaking changes
-- Show updated test coverage and quality metrics
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
+- Before/after code comparisons with file:line references
+- Performance improvements documented with benchmarks
+- Migration instructions for breaking changes
+- Updated test coverage and quality metrics
+- Technical debt reduction summary
+
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ All existing tests pass (functionality preserved)
+□ New tests added for improved coverage
+□ Performance verified with benchmarks (if applicable)
+□ Backward compatibility maintained or migration provided
+□ Documentation updated with refactoring changes
+
+Focus: Incremental quality improvement while preserving functionality.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/testing.txt

@@ -1,43 +1,61 @@
-You are tasked with creating comprehensive tests for this codebase. Follow these guidelines:
+Create comprehensive tests for the codebase.
 
-## Test Strategy Phase:
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Analyze existing test coverage and identify gaps
+□ Follow project testing frameworks and conventions
+□ Include unit, integration, and end-to-end tests
+□ Ensure tests are reliable and deterministic
+
+## IMPLEMENTATION PHASES
+
+### Test Strategy Phase
 1. Analyze existing test coverage and identify gaps
 2. Study codebase architecture and critical paths
 3. Identify edge cases and error scenarios
 4. Review testing frameworks and conventions used
 
-## Unit Testing Phase:
+### Unit Testing Phase
 1. Write tests for individual functions and methods
 2. Test all branches and conditional logic
 3. Cover edge cases and boundary conditions
 4. Mock external dependencies appropriately
 
-## Integration Testing Phase:
+### Integration Testing Phase
 1. Test interactions between components and modules
 2. Verify API endpoints and data flow
 3. Test database operations and transactions
 4. Validate external service integrations
 
-## End-to-End Testing Phase:
+### End-to-End Testing Phase
 1. Test complete user workflows and scenarios
 2. Verify critical business logic and processes
 3. Test error handling and recovery mechanisms
 4. Validate performance under load
 
-## Quality Assurance:
+### Quality Assurance
 1. Ensure tests are reliable and deterministic
 2. Make tests readable and maintainable
 3. Add proper test documentation and comments
 4. Follow testing best practices and conventions
 
-## Test Data Management:
+### Test Data Management
 1. Create realistic test data and fixtures
 2. Ensure test isolation and cleanup
 3. Use factories or builders for complex objects
 4. Handle sensitive data appropriately in tests
 
-## Output Requirements:
-- Provide comprehensive test suite with high coverage
-- Include performance benchmarks where relevant
-- Document testing strategy and conventions used
-- Show test coverage metrics and quality improvements
+## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
+- Comprehensive test suite with high coverage
+- Performance benchmarks where relevant
+- Testing strategy and conventions documentation
+- Test coverage metrics and quality improvements
+- File:line references for tested code
+
+## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
+□ Test coverage gaps identified and filled
+□ All test types included (unit + integration + e2e)
+□ Tests are reliable and deterministic (no flaky tests)
+□ Test data properly managed (isolation + cleanup)
+□ Testing conventions followed consistently
+
+Focus: High-quality, reliable test suite with comprehensive coverage.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt

@@ -1,240 +0,0 @@
-# API-Level Documentation Template
-
-Generate comprehensive API documentation following this structure:
-
-## Overview
-[Brief description of the API's purpose and capabilities]
-
-## Authentication
-### Authentication Method
-[e.g., JWT, OAuth2, API Keys]
-
-### Obtaining Credentials
-```bash
-# Example authentication flow
-```
-
-### Using Credentials
-```http
-GET /api/resource HTTP/1.1
-Authorization: Bearer <token>
-```
-
----
-
-## Base URL
-```
-Production: https://api.example.com/v1
-Staging: https://staging.api.example.com/v1
-```
-
-## Common Response Codes
-| Code | Description |
-|------|-------------|
-| 200  | Success |
-| 201  | Created |
-| 400  | Bad Request |
-| 401  | Unauthorized |
-| 403  | Forbidden |
-| 404  | Not Found |
-| 500  | Internal Server Error |
-
----
-
-## Endpoints
-
-### Resource: Users
-
-#### GET /users
-**Description**: Retrieves a paginated list of users.
-
-**Query Parameters**:
-| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
-|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
-| `limit` | number | No | Number of results (default: 20, max: 100) |
-| `offset` | number | No | Pagination offset (default: 0) |
-| `sort` | string | No | Sort field (e.g., `name`, `-created_at`) |
-
-**Example Request**:
-```http
-GET /users?limit=10&offset=0&sort=-created_at HTTP/1.1
-Authorization: Bearer <token>
-```
-
-**Response (200 OK)**:
-```json
-{
-  "data": [
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "name": "John Doe",
-      "email": "john@example.com",
-      "created_at": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z"
-    }
-  ],
-  "pagination": {
-    "total": 100,
-    "limit": 10,
-    "offset": 0
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Error Response (401 Unauthorized)**:
-```json
-{
-  "error": {
-    "code": "UNAUTHORIZED",
-    "message": "Invalid or expired token"
-  }
-}
-```
-
----
-
-#### GET /users/:id
-**Description**: Retrieves a single user by ID.
-
-**Path Parameters**:
-| Parameter | Type | Description |
-|-----------|------|-------------|
-| `id` | number | User ID |
-
-**Example Request**:
-```http
-GET /users/123 HTTP/1.1
-Authorization: Bearer <token>
-```
-
-**Response (200 OK)**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": 123,
-  "name": "John Doe",
-  "email": "john@example.com",
-  "created_at": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
-  "updated_at": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
-}
-```
-
----
-
-#### POST /users
-**Description**: Creates a new user.
-
-**Request Body**:
-```json
-{
-  "name": "Jane Smith",
-  "email": "jane@example.com",
-  "password": "securePassword123"
-}
-```
-
-**Validation Rules**:
-- `name`: Required, 2-100 characters
-- `email`: Required, valid email format, must be unique
-- `password`: Required, minimum 8 characters
-
-**Response (201 Created)**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": 124,
-  "name": "Jane Smith",
-  "email": "jane@example.com",
-  "created_at": "2024-01-20T12:00:00Z"
-}
-```
-
-**Error Response (400 Bad Request)**:
-```json
-{
-  "error": {
-    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
-    "message": "Validation failed",
-    "details": [
-      {
-        "field": "email",
-        "message": "Email already exists"
-      }
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
----
-
-#### PUT /users/:id
-**Description**: Updates an existing user.
-
-**Path Parameters**:
-| Parameter | Type | Description |
-|-----------|------|-------------|
-| `id` | number | User ID |
-
-**Request Body** (all fields optional):
-```json
-{
-  "name": "Jane Doe",
-  "email": "jane.doe@example.com"
-}
-```
-
-**Response (200 OK)**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": 124,
-  "name": "Jane Doe",
-  "email": "jane.doe@example.com",
-  "updated_at": "2024-01-21T09:15:00Z"
-}
-```
-
----
-
-#### DELETE /users/:id
-**Description**: Deletes a user.
-
-**Path Parameters**:
-| Parameter | Type | Description |
-|-----------|------|-------------|
-| `id` | number | User ID |
-
-**Response (204 No Content)**:
-[Empty response body]
-
----
-
-## Rate Limiting
-- **Limit**: 1000 requests per hour per API key
-- **Headers**:
-  - `X-RateLimit-Limit`: Total requests allowed
-  - `X-RateLimit-Remaining`: Requests remaining
-  - `X-RateLimit-Reset`: Unix timestamp when limit resets
-
----
-
-## SDKs and Client Libraries
-- [JavaScript/TypeScript SDK](./sdks/javascript.md)
-- [Python SDK](./sdks/python.md)
-
----
-
-## Webhooks
-[Description of webhook system if applicable]
-
----
-
-## Changelog
-### v1.1.0 (2024-01-20)
-- Added user sorting functionality
-- Improved error messages
-
-### v1.0.0 (2024-01-01)
-- Initial API release
-
----
-
-**API Version**: 1.1.0
-**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
-**Support**: api-support@example.com

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Generate comprehensive API documentation for code or HTTP services.
+
+## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
+□ Include only sections relevant to the project type (Code API vs. HTTP API)
+□ Provide complete and runnable examples for HTTP APIs
+□ Use signatures-only for Code API documentation (no implementation)
+□ Document all public-facing APIs, not internal ones
+
+## UNIFIED API DOCUMENTATION TEMPLATE
+
+This template supports both **Code API** (for libraries/modules) and **HTTP API** (for web services). Include only the sections relevant to your project type.
+
+--- 
+
+...(content truncated)...