mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-02 15:23:19 +08:00
- Rename skill directory from workflow-lite-plan to workflow-lite-planex (planex = plan + execute) - Remove standalone lite-execute command entry from command.json and analyze_commands.py - Update all 60+ files referencing workflow-lite-plan to use workflow-lite-planex - Update descriptions to clarify Phase 1: plan → Phase 2: execute architecture - Remove lite-execute as standalone command from orchestrator routing tables - Update docs (EN/ZH) to reflect unified planex naming and phase descriptions
132 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
132 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: workflow-lite-planex
|
||
description: Lightweight planning and execution skill (Phase 1: plan, Phase 2: execute). Triggers on "workflow-lite-planex".
|
||
allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Workflow Lite-Planex
|
||
|
||
Unified lightweight planning and execution skill (planex = plan + execute). Phase 1 handles planning pipeline, Phase 2 handles execution.
|
||
|
||
## Architecture Overview
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ SKILL.md (Prompt Enhancement + Dispatch) │
|
||
│ → Enhance prompt → Dispatch to Phase 1 (lite-plan) │
|
||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
|
||
│
|
||
↓
|
||
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
|
||
│ lite-plan │ │lite-execute│
|
||
│ Phase 1 │──handoff─→│ Phase 2 │
|
||
│ Plan │ │ Execute │
|
||
└───────────┘ └───────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Compact Recovery (Phase Persistence)
|
||
|
||
Multi-phase execution (lite-plan → lite-execute) spans long conversations that trigger context compression. Uses **双重保险**: TodoWrite 跟踪 active phase 保护其不被压缩,sentinel 作为兜底。
|
||
|
||
> **⚠️ COMPACT DIRECTIVE**: Context compression MUST check TodoWrite phase status.
|
||
> The phase currently marked `in_progress` is the active execution phase — preserve its FULL content.
|
||
> Only compress phases marked `completed` or `pending`.
|
||
|
||
## Routing
|
||
|
||
Trigger `workflow-lite-planex` → dispatches to Phase 1 (lite-plan). Phase 1 internally hands off to Phase 2 (lite-execute) after plan confirmation.
|
||
|
||
| Phase | Document | Description |
|
||
|-------|----------|-------------|
|
||
| Phase 1 | [phases/01-lite-plan.md](phases/01-lite-plan.md) | Planning pipeline (explore → plan → confirm → handoff to Phase 2) |
|
||
| Phase 2 | [phases/02-lite-execute.md](phases/02-lite-execute.md) | Execution engine (internal, called by Phase 1 Phase 5) |
|
||
|
||
## Interactive Preference Collection
|
||
|
||
Before dispatching, collect workflow preferences via AskUserQuestion:
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// ★ 统一 auto mode 检测:-y/--yes 从 $ARGUMENTS 或 ccw 传播
|
||
const autoYes = /\b(-y|--yes)\b/.test($ARGUMENTS)
|
||
|
||
if (autoYes) {
|
||
// 自动模式:跳过所有询问,使用默认值
|
||
workflowPreferences = { autoYes: true, forceExplore: false }
|
||
} else if (mode === 'plan') {
|
||
const prefResponse = AskUserQuestion({
|
||
questions: [
|
||
{
|
||
question: "是否跳过所有确认步骤(自动模式)?",
|
||
header: "Auto Mode",
|
||
multiSelect: false,
|
||
options: [
|
||
{ label: "Interactive (Recommended)", description: "交互模式,包含确认步骤" },
|
||
{ label: "Auto", description: "跳过所有确认,自动执行" }
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
question: "是否强制执行代码探索阶段?",
|
||
header: "Exploration",
|
||
multiSelect: false,
|
||
options: [
|
||
{ label: "Auto-detect (Recommended)", description: "智能判断是否需要探索" },
|
||
{ label: "Force explore", description: "强制执行代码探索" }
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
})
|
||
workflowPreferences = {
|
||
autoYes: prefResponse.autoMode === 'Auto',
|
||
forceExplore: prefResponse.exploration === 'Force explore'
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**workflowPreferences** is passed to phase execution as context variable, referenced as `workflowPreferences.autoYes` and `workflowPreferences.forceExplore` within phases.
|
||
|
||
## Prompt Enhancement
|
||
|
||
After collecting preferences, enhance context and dispatch:
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// Step 1: Load project context via ccw spec
|
||
Bash('ccw spec load --category planning')
|
||
|
||
// Step 2: Log available context
|
||
console.log('Project context loaded via: ccw spec load --category planning')
|
||
|
||
// Step 3: Dispatch to Phase 1 (workflowPreferences available as context)
|
||
// Read phases/01-lite-plan.md and execute
|
||
// Phase 1 internally hands off to Phase 2 (lite-execute) after plan confirmation
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Execution Flow
|
||
|
||
### Plan Mode
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
1. Collect preferences via AskUserQuestion (autoYes, forceExplore)
|
||
2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
|
||
3. Read phases/01-lite-plan.md
|
||
4. Execute lite-plan pipeline (Phase 1-5 within the phase doc)
|
||
5. lite-plan Phase 5 directly reads and executes Phase 2 (lite-execute) with executionContext
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Usage
|
||
|
||
Task description provided as arguments → interactive preference collection → planning pipeline → execution.
|
||
|
||
**Plan mode only**: lite-plan handles planning (Phase 1) and automatically hands off to lite-execute (Phase 2) for execution. There is no standalone execute mode.
|
||
|
||
## Phase Reference Documents
|
||
|
||
| Phase | Document | Purpose | Compact |
|
||
|-------|----------|---------|---------|
|
||
| 1 | [phases/01-lite-plan.md](phases/01-lite-plan.md) | Complete planning pipeline: exploration, clarification, planning, confirmation, handoff | TodoWrite 驱动 |
|
||
| 2 | [phases/02-lite-execute.md](phases/02-lite-execute.md) | Complete execution engine: input modes, task grouping, batch execution, code review | TodoWrite 驱动 + 🔄 sentinel |
|
||
|
||
**Compact Rules**:
|
||
1. **TodoWrite `in_progress`** → 保留完整内容,禁止压缩
|
||
2. **TodoWrite `completed`** → 可压缩为摘要
|
||
3. **🔄 sentinel fallback** → Phase 2 包含 compact sentinel;若 compact 后仅存 sentinel 而无完整 Step 协议,必须立即 `Read("phases/02-lite-execute.md")` 恢复
|