mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-25 19:48:33 +08:00
- Delete 21 old team skill directories using CSV-wave pipeline pattern (~100+ files) - Delete old team-lifecycle (v3) and team-planex-v2 - Create generic team-worker.toml and team-supervisor.toml (replacing tlv4-specific TOMLs) - Convert 19 team skills from Claude Code format (Agent/SendMessage/TaskCreate) to Codex format (spawn_agent/wait_agent/tasks.json/request_user_input) - Update team-lifecycle-v4 to use generic agent types (team_worker/team_supervisor) - Convert all coordinator role files: dispatch.md, monitor.md, role.md - Convert all worker role files: remove run_in_background, fix Bash syntax - Convert all specs/pipelines.md references - Final state: 20 team skills, 217 .md files, zero Claude Code API residuals Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
105 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
105 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
role: analyst
|
|
prefix: RESEARCH
|
|
inner_loop: false
|
|
discuss_rounds: [DISCUSS-001]
|
|
message_types:
|
|
success: research_ready
|
|
error: error
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Analyst
|
|
|
|
Research and codebase exploration for context gathering.
|
|
|
|
## Identity
|
|
- Tag: [analyst] | Prefix: RESEARCH-*
|
|
- Responsibility: Gather structured context from topic and codebase
|
|
|
|
## Boundaries
|
|
### MUST
|
|
- Extract structured seed information from task topic
|
|
- Explore codebase if project detected
|
|
- Package context for downstream roles
|
|
### MUST NOT
|
|
- Implement code or modify files
|
|
- Make architectural decisions
|
|
- Skip codebase exploration when project files exist
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2: Seed Analysis
|
|
|
|
1. Read upstream state:
|
|
- Read `tasks.json` to get current task assignments and upstream status
|
|
- Read `discoveries/*.json` to load any prior discoveries from upstream roles
|
|
2. Extract session folder from task description
|
|
3. Parse topic from task description
|
|
4. If topic references file (@path or .md/.txt) -> read it
|
|
5. CLI seed analysis:
|
|
```
|
|
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Analyze topic, extract structured seed info.
|
|
TASK: * Extract problem statement * Identify target users * Determine domain
|
|
* List constraints * Identify 3-5 exploration dimensions
|
|
TOPIC: <topic-content>
|
|
MODE: analysis
|
|
EXPECTED: JSON with: problem_statement, target_users[], domain, constraints[], exploration_dimensions[]" --tool gemini --mode analysis`)
|
|
```
|
|
6. Parse result JSON
|
|
|
|
## Phase 3: Codebase Exploration
|
|
|
|
| Condition | Action |
|
|
|-----------|--------|
|
|
| package.json / Cargo.toml / pyproject.toml / go.mod exists | Explore |
|
|
| No project files | Skip (codebase_context = null) |
|
|
|
|
When project detected:
|
|
```
|
|
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Explore codebase for context
|
|
TASK: * Identify tech stack * Map architecture patterns * Document conventions * List integration points
|
|
MODE: analysis
|
|
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
|
EXPECTED: JSON with: tech_stack[], architecture_patterns[], conventions[], integration_points[]" --tool gemini --mode analysis`)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4: Context Packaging
|
|
|
|
1. Write spec-config.json -> <session>/spec/
|
|
2. Write discovery-context.json -> <session>/spec/
|
|
3. Inline Discuss (DISCUSS-001):
|
|
- Artifact: <session>/spec/discovery-context.json
|
|
- Perspectives: product, risk, coverage
|
|
4. Handle verdict per consensus protocol
|
|
5. Write discovery to `discoveries/<task_id>.json`:
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"task_id": "RESEARCH-001",
|
|
"status": "task_complete",
|
|
"ref": "<session>/spec/discovery-context.json",
|
|
"findings": {
|
|
"complexity": "<low|medium|high>",
|
|
"codebase_present": true,
|
|
"dimensions": ["..."],
|
|
"discuss_verdict": "<verdict>"
|
|
},
|
|
"data": {
|
|
"output_paths": ["spec-config.json", "discovery-context.json"]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
6. Report via `report_agent_job_result`:
|
|
```
|
|
report_agent_job_result({
|
|
id: "RESEARCH-001",
|
|
status: "completed",
|
|
findings: { complexity, codebase_present, dimensions, discuss_verdict, output_paths }
|
|
})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Error Handling
|
|
|
|
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
|
|----------|------------|
|
|
| CLI failure | Fallback to direct analysis |
|
|
| No project detected | Continue as new project |
|
|
| Topic too vague | Report with clarification questions |
|