mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-11 02:33:51 +08:00
- Add concept-verify and action-plan-verify quality gate commands - Enhance IMPL_PLAN.md with CCW Workflow Context section - Add Artifact Usage Strategy for clear CCW artifact hierarchy - Update frontmatter with context_package, verification_history, phase_progression - Synchronize enhancements across task-generate, task-generate-agent, task-generate-tdd - Update synthesis, plan, and tdd-plan commands with verification guidance Makes CCW's multi-phase workflow and intelligent context gathering visible in generated documentation. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
631 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
631 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: task-generate-agent
|
|
description: Autonomous task generation using action-planning-agent with discovery and output phases
|
|
usage: /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session <session_id>
|
|
argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
|
|
examples:
|
|
- /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Autonomous Task Generation Command
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation.
|
|
|
|
## Core Philosophy
|
|
- **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
|
|
- **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
|
|
- **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
|
|
- **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and research
|
|
|
|
## Execution Lifecycle
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading
|
|
**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
|
|
|
|
**Agent Context Package**:
|
|
```javascript
|
|
{
|
|
"session_id": "WFS-[session-id]",
|
|
"session_metadata": {
|
|
// If in memory: use cached content
|
|
// Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
|
|
},
|
|
"analysis_results": {
|
|
// If in memory: use cached content
|
|
// Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
|
},
|
|
"artifacts_inventory": {
|
|
// If in memory: use cached list
|
|
// Else: Scan .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/ directory
|
|
"synthesis_specification": "path or null",
|
|
"topic_framework": "path or null",
|
|
"role_analyses": ["paths"]
|
|
},
|
|
"context_package": {
|
|
// If in memory: use cached content
|
|
// Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
|
|
},
|
|
"mcp_capabilities": {
|
|
"code_index": true,
|
|
"exa_code": true,
|
|
"exa_web": true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Discovery Actions**:
|
|
1. **Load Session Context** (if not in memory)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
if (!memory.has("workflow-session.json")) {
|
|
Read(.workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. **Load Analysis Results** (if not in memory)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
if (!memory.has("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")) {
|
|
Read(.workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
3. **Discover Artifacts** (if not in memory)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
if (!memory.has("artifacts_inventory")) {
|
|
bash(find .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/ -name "*.md" -type f)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
4. **MCP Code Analysis** (optional - enhance understanding)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
// Find relevant files for task context
|
|
mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
|
|
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
|
|
pattern="authentication|oauth",
|
|
file_pattern="*.ts"
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
5. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather best practices)
|
|
```javascript
|
|
// Get external examples for implementation
|
|
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
|
|
query="TypeScript JWT authentication best practices",
|
|
tokensNum="dynamic"
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
|
|
|
|
**Agent Invocation**:
|
|
```javascript
|
|
Task(
|
|
subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
|
|
description="Generate task JSON and implementation plan",
|
|
prompt=`
|
|
## Execution Context
|
|
|
|
**Session ID**: WFS-{session-id}
|
|
**Mode**: Two-Phase Autonomous Task Generation
|
|
|
|
## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
|
|
|
|
### Session Metadata
|
|
{session_metadata_content}
|
|
|
|
### Analysis Results
|
|
{analysis_results_content}
|
|
|
|
### Artifacts Inventory
|
|
- **Synthesis Specification**: {synthesis_spec_path}
|
|
- **Topic Framework**: {topic_framework_path}
|
|
- **Role Analyses**: {role_analyses_list}
|
|
|
|
### Context Package
|
|
{context_package_summary}
|
|
|
|
### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
|
|
**Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
|
|
**External Research**: {mcp_exa_research_results}
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2: Document Generation Task
|
|
|
|
### Task Decomposition Standards
|
|
**Core Principle**: Task Merging Over Decomposition
|
|
- **Merge Rule**: Execute together when possible
|
|
- **Decompose Only When**:
|
|
- Excessive workload (>2500 lines or >6 files)
|
|
- Different tech stacks or domains
|
|
- Sequential dependency blocking
|
|
- Parallel execution needed
|
|
|
|
**Task Limits**:
|
|
- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit)
|
|
- **Function-based**: Complete units (logic + UI + tests + config)
|
|
- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5) | Two-level (6-10) | Re-scope (>10)
|
|
|
|
### Required Outputs
|
|
|
|
#### 1. Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
|
|
**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/.task/
|
|
**Schema**: 5-field enhanced schema with artifacts
|
|
|
|
**Required Fields**:
|
|
\`\`\`json
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "IMPL-N[.M]",
|
|
"title": "Descriptive task name",
|
|
"status": "pending",
|
|
"meta": {
|
|
"type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test|docs",
|
|
"agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
|
|
},
|
|
"context": {
|
|
"requirements": ["extracted from analysis"],
|
|
"focus_paths": ["src/paths"],
|
|
"acceptance": ["measurable criteria"],
|
|
"depends_on": ["IMPL-N"],
|
|
"artifacts": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "synthesis_specification",
|
|
"path": "{synthesis_spec_path}",
|
|
"priority": "highest",
|
|
"usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "role_analysis",
|
|
"path": "{role_analysis_path}",
|
|
"priority": "high",
|
|
"usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
|
|
"note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files included based on brainstorming results"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "topic_framework",
|
|
"path": "{topic_framework_path}",
|
|
"priority": "low",
|
|
"usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"flow_control": {
|
|
"pre_analysis": [
|
|
{
|
|
"step": "load_synthesis_specification",
|
|
"action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification",
|
|
"commands": [
|
|
"bash(ls {synthesis_spec_path} 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')",
|
|
"Read({synthesis_spec_path})"
|
|
],
|
|
"output_to": "synthesis_specification",
|
|
"on_error": "skip_optional"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
|
|
"action": "Explore codebase using MCP",
|
|
"command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\\"[patterns]\\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\\"[patterns]\\")",
|
|
"output_to": "codebase_structure"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"step": "analyze_task_patterns",
|
|
"action": "Analyze existing code patterns",
|
|
"commands": [
|
|
"bash(cd \\"[focus_paths]\\")",
|
|
"bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \\"PURPOSE: Analyze patterns TASK: Review '[title]' CONTEXT: [synthesis_specification] EXPECTED: Pattern analysis RULES: Prioritize synthesis-specification.md\\")"
|
|
],
|
|
"output_to": "task_context",
|
|
"on_error": "fail"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"implementation_approach": {
|
|
"task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
|
|
"modification_points": ["Apply requirements from synthesis"],
|
|
"logic_flow": [
|
|
"Load synthesis specification",
|
|
"Analyze existing patterns",
|
|
"Implement following specification",
|
|
"Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
|
|
"Validate against acceptance criteria"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
#### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md
|
|
**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
|
|
**Structure**:
|
|
\`\`\`markdown
|
|
---
|
|
identifier: WFS-{session-id}
|
|
source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
|
|
analysis: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
|
|
artifacts: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/
|
|
context_package: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json # CCW smart context
|
|
workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design" # Indicates execution model
|
|
verification_history: # CCW quality gates
|
|
concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
|
|
action_plan_verify: "pending"
|
|
phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → analysis → concept_verify → planning" # CCW workflow phases
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
|
|
|
|
## 1. Summary
|
|
Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
|
|
|
|
**Core Objectives**:
|
|
- [Key objective 1]
|
|
- [Key objective 2]
|
|
|
|
**Technical Approach**:
|
|
- [High-level approach]
|
|
|
|
## 2. Context Analysis
|
|
|
|
### CCW Workflow Context
|
|
**Phase Progression**:
|
|
- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (synthesis-specification.md generated)
|
|
- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
|
|
- ✅ Phase 3: Enhanced Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel insights)
|
|
- ✅ Phase 4: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, synthesis updated | skipped)
|
|
- ⏳ Phase 5: Action Planning (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md)
|
|
|
|
**Quality Gates**:
|
|
- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (0 ambiguities remaining) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
|
|
- action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
|
|
|
|
**Context Package Summary**:
|
|
- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
|
|
- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
|
|
- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
|
|
- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {dependency count} dependencies identified
|
|
|
|
### Project Profile
|
|
- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
|
|
- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
|
|
- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
|
|
- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
|
|
|
|
### Module Structure
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
[Directory tree showing key modules]
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
### Dependencies
|
|
**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
|
|
**APIs**: [External services]
|
|
**Development**: [Testing, linting, CI/CD tools]
|
|
|
|
### Patterns & Conventions
|
|
- **Architecture**: [Key patterns like DI, Event-Driven]
|
|
- **Component Design**: [Design patterns]
|
|
- **State Management**: [State strategy]
|
|
- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
|
|
|
|
## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
|
|
|
|
### Artifact Usage Strategy
|
|
**Primary Reference (synthesis-specification.md)**:
|
|
- **What**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint from multi-role synthesis
|
|
- **When**: Every task references this first for requirements and design decisions
|
|
- **How**: Extract architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns, functional requirements, non-functional requirements
|
|
- **Priority**: Authoritative - overrides role-specific analyses when conflicts arise
|
|
- **CCW Value**: Consolidates insights from all brainstorming roles into single source of truth
|
|
|
|
**Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
|
|
- **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
|
|
- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure
|
|
- **Usage**: Tasks load this via \`flow_control.preparatory_steps\` for environment setup
|
|
- **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
|
|
|
|
**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
|
|
- **What**: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel analysis results
|
|
- **Content**: Optimization strategies, risk assessment, architecture review, implementation patterns
|
|
- **Usage**: Referenced in task planning for technical guidance and risk mitigation
|
|
- **CCW Value**: Multi-model parallel analysis providing comprehensive technical intelligence
|
|
|
|
### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
|
|
- **synthesis-specification.md**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
|
|
- Contains: Architecture design, UI/UX guidelines, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation roadmap, risk assessment
|
|
|
|
### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
|
|
- **topic-framework.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
|
|
- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Detailed architecture specifications
|
|
- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Layout and component specifications
|
|
- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Product vision and user stories
|
|
|
|
**Artifact Priority in Development**:
|
|
1. synthesis-specification.md (primary reference for all tasks)
|
|
2. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
|
|
3. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis and optimization strategies)
|
|
4. Role-specific analyses (fallback for detailed specifications)
|
|
|
|
## 4. Implementation Strategy
|
|
|
|
### Execution Strategy
|
|
**Execution Model**: [Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles]
|
|
|
|
**Rationale**: [Why this execution model fits the project]
|
|
|
|
**Parallelization Opportunities**:
|
|
- [List independent workstreams]
|
|
|
|
**Serialization Requirements**:
|
|
- [List critical dependencies]
|
|
|
|
### Architectural Approach
|
|
**Key Architecture Decisions**:
|
|
- [ADR references from synthesis]
|
|
- [Justification for architecture patterns]
|
|
|
|
**Integration Strategy**:
|
|
- [How modules communicate]
|
|
- [State management approach]
|
|
|
|
### Key Dependencies
|
|
**Task Dependency Graph**:
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
[High-level dependency visualization]
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
|
|
|
|
### Testing Strategy
|
|
**Testing Approach**:
|
|
- Unit testing: [Tools, scope]
|
|
- Integration testing: [Key integration points]
|
|
- E2E testing: [Critical user flows]
|
|
|
|
**Coverage Targets**:
|
|
- Lines: ≥70%
|
|
- Functions: ≥70%
|
|
- Branches: ≥65%
|
|
|
|
**Quality Gates**:
|
|
- [CI/CD gates]
|
|
- [Performance budgets]
|
|
|
|
## 5. Task Breakdown Summary
|
|
|
|
### Task Count
|
|
**{N} tasks** (flat hierarchy | two-level hierarchy, sequential | parallel execution)
|
|
|
|
### Task Structure
|
|
- **IMPL-1**: [Main task title]
|
|
- **IMPL-2**: [Main task title]
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
### Complexity Assessment
|
|
- **High**: [List with rationale]
|
|
- **Medium**: [List]
|
|
- **Low**: [List]
|
|
|
|
### Dependencies
|
|
[Reference Section 4.3 for dependency graph]
|
|
|
|
**Parallelization Opportunities**:
|
|
- [Specific task groups that can run in parallel]
|
|
|
|
## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
|
|
|
|
### Execution Strategy
|
|
|
|
**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): [Phase Name]**
|
|
- **Tasks**: IMPL-1, IMPL-2
|
|
- **Deliverables**:
|
|
- [Specific deliverable 1]
|
|
- [Specific deliverable 2]
|
|
- **Success Criteria**:
|
|
- [Measurable criterion]
|
|
|
|
**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): [Phase Name]**
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
### Resource Requirements
|
|
|
|
**Development Team**:
|
|
- [Team composition and skills]
|
|
|
|
**External Dependencies**:
|
|
- [Third-party services, APIs]
|
|
|
|
**Infrastructure**:
|
|
- [Development, staging, production environments]
|
|
|
|
## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
|
|
|
|
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
|
|
|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
|
|
| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Strategy] | [Role] |
|
|
|
|
**Critical Risks** (High impact + High probability):
|
|
- [Risk 1]: [Detailed mitigation plan]
|
|
|
|
**Monitoring Strategy**:
|
|
- [How risks will be monitored]
|
|
|
|
## 8. Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
**Functional Completeness**:
|
|
- [ ] All requirements from synthesis-specification.md implemented
|
|
- [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
|
|
|
|
**Technical Quality**:
|
|
- [ ] Test coverage ≥70%
|
|
- [ ] Bundle size within budget
|
|
- [ ] Performance targets met
|
|
|
|
**Operational Readiness**:
|
|
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
|
|
- [ ] Monitoring and logging configured
|
|
- [ ] Documentation complete
|
|
|
|
**Business Metrics**:
|
|
- [ ] [Key business metrics from synthesis]
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
#### 3. TODO_LIST.md
|
|
**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md
|
|
**Structure**:
|
|
\`\`\`markdown
|
|
# Tasks: {Session Topic}
|
|
|
|
## Task Progress
|
|
▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
|
|
- [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
|
|
- [ ] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json)
|
|
|
|
## Status Legend
|
|
- \`▸\` = Container task (has subtasks)
|
|
- \`- [ ]\` = Pending leaf task
|
|
- \`- [x]\` = Completed leaf task
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
### Execution Instructions
|
|
|
|
**Step 1: Extract Task Definitions**
|
|
- Parse analysis results for task recommendations
|
|
- Extract task ID, title, requirements, complexity
|
|
- Map artifacts to relevant tasks based on type
|
|
|
|
**Step 2: Generate Task JSON Files**
|
|
- Create individual .task/IMPL-*.json files
|
|
- Embed artifacts array with detected brainstorming outputs
|
|
- Generate flow_control with artifact loading steps
|
|
- Add MCP tool integration for codebase exploration
|
|
|
|
**Step 3: Create IMPL_PLAN.md**
|
|
- Summarize requirements and technical approach
|
|
- List detected artifacts with priorities
|
|
- Document task breakdown and dependencies
|
|
- Define execution strategy and success criteria
|
|
|
|
**Step 4: Generate TODO_LIST.md**
|
|
- List all tasks with container/leaf structure
|
|
- Link to task JSON files
|
|
- Use proper status indicators (▸, [ ], [x])
|
|
|
|
**Step 5: Update Session State**
|
|
- Update .workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
|
|
- Mark session as ready for execution
|
|
- Record task count and artifact inventory
|
|
|
|
### MCP Enhancement Examples
|
|
|
|
**Code Index Usage**:
|
|
\`\`\`javascript
|
|
// Discover authentication-related files
|
|
mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
|
|
|
|
// Search for OAuth patterns
|
|
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
|
|
pattern="oauth|jwt|authentication",
|
|
file_pattern="*.{ts,js}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Get file summary for key components
|
|
mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(
|
|
file_path="src/auth/index.ts"
|
|
)
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
**Exa Research Usage**:
|
|
\`\`\`javascript
|
|
// Get best practices for task implementation
|
|
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
|
|
query="TypeScript OAuth2 implementation patterns",
|
|
tokensNum="dynamic"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Research specific API usage
|
|
mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
|
|
query="Express.js JWT middleware examples",
|
|
tokensNum=5000
|
|
)
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
### Quality Validation
|
|
|
|
Before completion, verify:
|
|
- [ ] All task JSON files created in .task/ directory
|
|
- [ ] Each task JSON has 5 required fields
|
|
- [ ] Artifact references correctly mapped
|
|
- [ ] Flow control includes artifact loading steps
|
|
- [ ] MCP tool integration added where appropriate
|
|
- [ ] IMPL_PLAN.md follows required structure
|
|
- [ ] TODO_LIST.md matches task JSONs
|
|
- [ ] Dependency graph is acyclic
|
|
- [ ] Task count within limits (≤10)
|
|
- [ ] Session state updated
|
|
|
|
## Output
|
|
|
|
Generate all three documents and report completion status:
|
|
- Task JSON files created: N files
|
|
- Artifacts integrated: synthesis-spec, topic-framework, N role analyses
|
|
- MCP enhancements: code-index, exa-research
|
|
- Session ready for execution: /workflow:execute
|
|
`
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Command Integration
|
|
|
|
### Usage
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Basic usage
|
|
/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
|
|
|
|
# Called by /workflow:plan
|
|
SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-[id]")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Agent Context Passing
|
|
|
|
**Memory-Aware Context Assembly**:
|
|
```javascript
|
|
// Assemble context package for agent
|
|
const agentContext = {
|
|
session_id: "WFS-[id]",
|
|
|
|
// Use memory if available, else load
|
|
session_metadata: memory.has("workflow-session.json")
|
|
? memory.get("workflow-session.json")
|
|
: Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/workflow-session.json),
|
|
|
|
analysis_results: memory.has("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
|
|
? memory.get("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
|
|
: Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md),
|
|
|
|
artifacts_inventory: memory.has("artifacts_inventory")
|
|
? memory.get("artifacts_inventory")
|
|
: discoverArtifacts(),
|
|
|
|
context_package: memory.has("context-package.json")
|
|
? memory.get("context-package.json")
|
|
: Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json),
|
|
|
|
// Optional MCP enhancements
|
|
mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Related Commands
|
|
- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates planning and calls this command
|
|
- `/workflow:tools:task-generate` - Manual version without agent
|
|
- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package
|
|
- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides analysis results
|
|
- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks
|
|
|
|
## Key Differences from task-generate
|
|
|
|
| Feature | task-generate | task-generate-agent |
|
|
|---------|--------------|-------------------|
|
|
| Execution | Manual/scripted | Agent-driven |
|
|
| Phases | 6 phases | 2 phases (discovery + output) |
|
|
| MCP Integration | Optional | Enhanced with examples |
|
|
| Decision Logic | Command-driven | Agent-autonomous |
|
|
| Complexity | Higher control | Simpler delegation | |