mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-10 02:24:35 +08:00
a293a01d85
- Enhanced lite-execute, lite-fix, lite-lite-lite, lite-plan, multi-cli-plan, plan, replan, session complete, session solidify, and various UI design commands to support a --yes or -y flag for skipping user confirmations and auto-selecting defaults. - Updated argument hints and examples to reflect new auto mode functionality. - Implemented auto mode defaults for confirmation, execution methods, and code review options. - Improved error handling and validation in command parsing and execution processes.
744 lines
27 KiB
Markdown
744 lines
27 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: lite-execute
|
||
description: Execute tasks based on in-memory plan, prompt description, or file content
|
||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] [--in-memory] [\"task description\"|file-path]"
|
||
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), Bash(*)
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Workflow Lite-Execute Command (/workflow:lite-execute)
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
|
||
Flexible task execution command supporting three input modes: in-memory plan (from lite-plan), direct prompt description, or file content. Handles execution orchestration, progress tracking, and optional code review.
|
||
|
||
**Core capabilities:**
|
||
- Multi-mode input (in-memory plan, prompt description, or file path)
|
||
- Execution orchestration (Agent or Codex) with full context
|
||
- Live progress tracking via TodoWrite at execution call level
|
||
- Optional code review with selected tool (Gemini, Agent, or custom)
|
||
- Context continuity across multiple executions
|
||
- Intelligent format detection (Enhanced Task JSON vs plain text)
|
||
|
||
## Usage
|
||
|
||
### Command Syntax
|
||
```bash
|
||
/workflow:lite-execute [FLAGS] <INPUT>
|
||
|
||
# Flags
|
||
--in-memory Use plan from memory (called by lite-plan)
|
||
|
||
# Arguments
|
||
<input> Task description string, or path to file (required)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Input Modes
|
||
|
||
### Mode 1: In-Memory Plan
|
||
|
||
**Trigger**: Called by lite-plan after Phase 4 approval with `--in-memory` flag
|
||
|
||
**Input Source**: `executionContext` global variable set by lite-plan
|
||
|
||
**Content**: Complete execution context (see Data Structures section)
|
||
|
||
**Behavior**:
|
||
- Skip execution method selection (already set by lite-plan)
|
||
- Directly proceed to execution with full context
|
||
- All planning artifacts available (exploration, clarifications, plan)
|
||
|
||
### Mode 2: Prompt Description
|
||
|
||
**Trigger**: User calls with task description string
|
||
|
||
**Input**: Simple task description (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
|
||
|
||
**Behavior**:
|
||
- Store prompt as `originalUserInput`
|
||
- Create simple execution plan from prompt
|
||
- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
|
||
- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Agent/Other)
|
||
- Proceed to execution with `originalUserInput` included
|
||
|
||
**User Interaction**:
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// Parse --yes flag
|
||
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
|
||
|
||
let userSelection
|
||
|
||
if (autoYes) {
|
||
// Auto mode: Use defaults
|
||
console.log(`[--yes] Auto-confirming execution:`)
|
||
console.log(` - Execution method: Auto`)
|
||
console.log(` - Code review: Skip`)
|
||
|
||
userSelection = {
|
||
execution_method: "Auto",
|
||
code_review_tool: "Skip"
|
||
}
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Interactive mode: Ask user
|
||
userSelection = AskUserQuestion({
|
||
questions: [
|
||
{
|
||
question: "Select execution method:",
|
||
header: "Execution",
|
||
multiSelect: false,
|
||
options: [
|
||
{ label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
|
||
{ label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
|
||
{ label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
question: "Enable code review after execution?",
|
||
header: "Code Review",
|
||
multiSelect: false,
|
||
options: [
|
||
{ label: "Skip", description: "No review" },
|
||
{ label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" },
|
||
{ label: "Codex Review", description: "Git-aware review (prompt OR --uncommitted)" },
|
||
{ label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" }
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Mode 3: File Content
|
||
|
||
**Trigger**: User calls with file path
|
||
|
||
**Input**: Path to file containing task description or plan.json
|
||
|
||
**Step 1: Read and Detect Format**
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
fileContent = Read(filePath)
|
||
|
||
// Attempt JSON parsing
|
||
try {
|
||
jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
|
||
|
||
// Check if plan.json from lite-plan session
|
||
if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.tasks) {
|
||
planObject = jsonData
|
||
originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
|
||
isPlanJson = true
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Valid JSON but not plan.json - treat as plain text
|
||
originalUserInput = fileContent
|
||
isPlanJson = false
|
||
}
|
||
} catch {
|
||
// Not valid JSON - treat as plain text prompt
|
||
originalUserInput = fileContent
|
||
isPlanJson = false
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Step 2: Create Execution Plan**
|
||
|
||
If `isPlanJson === true`:
|
||
- Use `planObject` directly
|
||
- User selects execution method and code review
|
||
|
||
If `isPlanJson === false`:
|
||
- Treat file content as prompt (same behavior as Mode 2)
|
||
- Create simple execution plan from content
|
||
|
||
**Step 3: User Interaction**
|
||
|
||
- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
|
||
- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool
|
||
- Proceed to execution with full context
|
||
|
||
## Execution Process
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Input Parsing:
|
||
└─ Decision (mode detection):
|
||
├─ --in-memory flag → Mode 1: Load executionContext → Skip user selection
|
||
├─ Ends with .md/.json/.txt → Mode 3: Read file → Detect format
|
||
│ ├─ Valid plan.json → Use planObject → User selects method + review
|
||
│ └─ Not plan.json → Treat as prompt → User selects method + review
|
||
└─ Other → Mode 2: Prompt description → User selects method + review
|
||
|
||
Execution:
|
||
├─ Step 1: Initialize result tracking (previousExecutionResults = [])
|
||
├─ Step 2: Task grouping & batch creation
|
||
│ ├─ Extract explicit depends_on (no file/keyword inference)
|
||
│ ├─ Group: independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
|
||
│ ├─ Group: dependent tasks → sequential phases (respect dependencies)
|
||
│ └─ Create TodoWrite list for batches
|
||
├─ Step 3: Launch execution
|
||
│ ├─ Phase 1: All independent tasks (⚡ single batch, concurrent)
|
||
│ └─ Phase 2+: Dependent tasks by dependency order
|
||
├─ Step 4: Track progress (TodoWrite updates per batch)
|
||
└─ Step 5: Code review (if codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip")
|
||
|
||
Output:
|
||
└─ Execution complete with results in previousExecutionResults[]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Detailed Execution Steps
|
||
|
||
### Step 1: Initialize Execution Tracking
|
||
|
||
**Operations**:
|
||
- Initialize result tracking for multi-execution scenarios
|
||
- Set up `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity
|
||
- **In-Memory Mode**: Echo execution strategy from lite-plan for transparency
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// Initialize result tracking
|
||
previousExecutionResults = []
|
||
|
||
// In-Memory Mode: Echo execution strategy (transparency before execution)
|
||
if (executionContext) {
|
||
console.log(`
|
||
📋 Execution Strategy (from lite-plan):
|
||
Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod}
|
||
Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool}
|
||
Tasks: ${executionContext.planObject.tasks.length}
|
||
Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity}
|
||
${executionContext.executorAssignments ? ` Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''}
|
||
`)
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation
|
||
|
||
**Dependency Analysis & Grouping Algorithm**:
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// Use explicit depends_on from plan.json (no inference from file/keywords)
|
||
function extractDependencies(tasks) {
|
||
const taskIdToIndex = {}
|
||
tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
|
||
|
||
return tasks.map((task, i) => {
|
||
// Only use explicit depends_on from plan.json
|
||
const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
|
||
.map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
|
||
.filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
|
||
return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Group into batches: maximize parallel execution
|
||
function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
|
||
const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
|
||
const processed = new Set()
|
||
const calls = []
|
||
|
||
// Phase 1: All independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
|
||
const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
|
||
if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
|
||
independentTasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
|
||
calls.push({
|
||
method: executionMethod,
|
||
executionType: "parallel",
|
||
groupId: "P1",
|
||
taskSummary: independentTasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '),
|
||
tasks: independentTasks
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Phase 2: Dependent tasks → sequential batches (respect dependencies)
|
||
let sequentialIndex = 1
|
||
let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
|
||
|
||
while (remaining.length > 0) {
|
||
// Find tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied
|
||
const ready = remaining.filter(t =>
|
||
t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
if (ready.length === 0) {
|
||
console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining tasks')
|
||
ready.push(...remaining)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Group ready tasks (can run in parallel within this phase)
|
||
ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
|
||
calls.push({
|
||
method: executionMethod,
|
||
executionType: ready.length > 1 ? "parallel" : "sequential",
|
||
groupId: ready.length > 1 ? `P${calls.length + 1}` : `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
|
||
taskSummary: ready.map(t => t.title).join(ready.length > 1 ? ' | ' : ' → '),
|
||
tasks: ready
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
return calls
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(planObject.tasks, executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
|
||
|
||
TodoWrite({
|
||
todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
|
||
content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : "→"} ${c.id} (${c.tasks.length} tasks)`,
|
||
status: "pending",
|
||
activeForm: `Executing ${c.id}`
|
||
}))
|
||
})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Step 3: Launch Execution
|
||
|
||
**Executor Resolution** (任务级 executor 优先于全局设置):
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// 获取任务的 executor（优先使用 executorAssignments，fallback 到全局 executionMethod）
|
||
function getTaskExecutor(task) {
|
||
const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
|
||
if (assignments[task.id]) {
|
||
return assignments[task.id].executor // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
|
||
}
|
||
// Fallback: 全局 executionMethod 映射
|
||
const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
|
||
if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
|
||
if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
|
||
// Auto: 根据复杂度
|
||
return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex'
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// 按 executor 分组任务
|
||
function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
|
||
const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
|
||
tasks.forEach(task => {
|
||
const executor = getTaskExecutor(task)
|
||
groups[executor].push(task)
|
||
})
|
||
return groups
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Execution Flow**: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
|
||
```javascript
|
||
const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
|
||
const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")
|
||
|
||
// Phase 1: Launch all parallel batches (single message with multiple tool calls)
|
||
if (parallel.length > 0) {
|
||
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending" })) })
|
||
parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
|
||
previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
|
||
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending" })) })
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Phase 2: Execute sequential batches one by one
|
||
for (const call of sequential) {
|
||
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c === call ? "in_progress" : "..." })) })
|
||
result = await executeBatch(call)
|
||
previousExecutionResults.push(result)
|
||
TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: "completed" or "pending" })) })
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Unified Task Prompt Builder
|
||
|
||
**Task Formatting Principle**: Each task is a self-contained checklist. The executor only needs to know what THIS task requires. Same template for Agent and CLI.
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
|
||
// Task template (6 parts: Modification Points → Why → How → Reference → Risks → Done)
|
||
const formatTask = (t) => `
|
||
## ${t.title}
|
||
|
||
**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\` | **Action**: ${t.action}
|
||
|
||
### Modification Points
|
||
${t.modification_points.map(p => `- **${p.file}** → \`${p.target}\`: ${p.change}`).join('\n')}
|
||
|
||
${t.rationale ? `
|
||
### Why this approach (Medium/High)
|
||
${t.rationale.chosen_approach}
|
||
${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `\nKey factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''}
|
||
${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `\nTradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}
|
||
` : ''}
|
||
|
||
### How to do it
|
||
${t.description}
|
||
|
||
${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
|
||
|
||
${t.code_skeleton ? `
|
||
### Code skeleton (High)
|
||
${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
|
||
${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `\n**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
|
||
${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `\n**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
|
||
` : ''}
|
||
|
||
### Reference
|
||
- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
|
||
- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
|
||
${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}
|
||
|
||
${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `
|
||
### Risk mitigations (High)
|
||
${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}
|
||
` : ''}
|
||
|
||
### Done when
|
||
${t.acceptance.map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
|
||
${t.verification?.success_metrics?.length > 0 ? `\n**Success metrics**: ${t.verification.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}`
|
||
|
||
// Build prompt
|
||
const sections = []
|
||
|
||
if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
|
||
|
||
sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)
|
||
|
||
// Context (reference only)
|
||
const context = []
|
||
if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
|
||
context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
|
||
}
|
||
if (clarificationContext) {
|
||
context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
|
||
}
|
||
if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram) {
|
||
context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`)
|
||
}
|
||
if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
|
||
context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
|
||
}
|
||
// Project guidelines (user-defined constraints from /workflow:session:solidify)
|
||
context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n@.workflow/project-guidelines.json`)
|
||
if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)
|
||
|
||
sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
|
||
|
||
return sections.join('\n\n')
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Option A: Agent Execution**
|
||
|
||
When to use:
|
||
- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "agent"`
|
||
- 或 `executionMethod = "Agent"` (全局 fallback)
|
||
- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"` (全局 fallback)
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
Task(
|
||
subagent_type="code-developer",
|
||
run_in_background=false,
|
||
description=batch.taskSummary,
|
||
prompt=buildExecutionPrompt(batch)
|
||
)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Result Collection**: After completion, collect result following `executionResult` structure (see Data Structures section)
|
||
|
||
**Option B: CLI Execution (Codex)**
|
||
|
||
When to use:
|
||
- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "codex"`
|
||
- 或 `executionMethod = "Codex"` (全局 fallback)
|
||
- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium/High"` (全局 fallback)
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Execution with fixed IDs** (predictable ID pattern):
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// Launch CLI in background, wait for task hook callback
|
||
// Generate fixed execution ID: ${sessionId}-${groupId}
|
||
const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
|
||
const fixedExecutionId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}` // e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
|
||
|
||
// Check if resuming from previous failed execution
|
||
const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
|
||
|
||
// Build command with fixed ID (and optional resume for continuation)
|
||
const cli_command = previousCliId
|
||
? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
|
||
: `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}`
|
||
|
||
// Execute in background, stop output and wait for task hook callback
|
||
Bash(
|
||
command=cli_command,
|
||
run_in_background=true
|
||
)
|
||
// STOP HERE - CLI executes in background, task hook will notify on completion
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Resume on Failure** (with fixed ID):
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// If execution failed or timed out, offer resume option
|
||
if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
|
||
console.log(`
|
||
⚠️ Execution incomplete. Resume available:
|
||
Fixed ID: ${fixedExecutionId}
|
||
Lookup: ccw cli detail ${fixedExecutionId}
|
||
Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue tasks" --resume ${fixedExecutionId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}-retry
|
||
`)
|
||
|
||
// Store for potential retry in same session
|
||
batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedExecutionId
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Result Collection**: After completion, analyze output and collect result following `executionResult` structure (include `cliExecutionId` for resume capability)
|
||
|
||
**Option C: CLI Execution (Gemini)**
|
||
|
||
When to use: `getTaskExecutor(task) === "gemini"` (分析类任务)
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# 使用统一的 buildExecutionPrompt，切换 tool 和 mode
|
||
ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Step 4: Progress Tracking
|
||
|
||
Progress tracked at batch level (not individual task level). Icons: ⚡ (parallel, concurrent), → (sequential, one-by-one)
|
||
|
||
### Step 5: Code Review (Optional)
|
||
|
||
**Skip Condition**: Only run if `codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip"`
|
||
|
||
**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against plan acceptance criteria and verification requirements
|
||
- Read plan.json for task acceptance criteria and verification checklist
|
||
- Check each acceptance criterion is fulfilled
|
||
- Verify success metrics from verification field (Medium/High complexity)
|
||
- Run unit/integration tests specified in verification field
|
||
- Validate code quality and identify issues
|
||
- Ensure alignment with planned approach and risk mitigations
|
||
|
||
**Operations**:
|
||
- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review
|
||
- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt
|
||
- Codex Review: Two options - (A) with prompt for complex reviews, (B) `--uncommitted` flag only for quick reviews
|
||
- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, etc.)
|
||
|
||
**Unified Review Template** (All tools use same standard):
|
||
|
||
**Review Criteria**:
|
||
- **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify each criterion from plan.tasks[].acceptance
|
||
- **Verification Checklist** (Medium/High): Check unit_tests, integration_tests, success_metrics from plan.tasks[].verification
|
||
- **Code Quality**: Analyze quality, identify issues, suggest improvements
|
||
- **Plan Alignment**: Validate implementation matches planned approach and risk mitigations
|
||
|
||
**Shared Prompt Template** (used by all CLI tools):
|
||
```
|
||
PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against plan acceptance criteria and verification requirements
|
||
TASK: • Verify plan acceptance criteria fulfillment • Check verification requirements (unit tests, success metrics) • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence and risk mitigations
|
||
MODE: analysis
|
||
CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements including verification checklist
|
||
EXPECTED: Quality assessment with:
|
||
- Acceptance criteria verification (all tasks)
|
||
- Verification checklist validation (Medium/High: unit_tests, integration_tests, success_metrics)
|
||
- Issue identification
|
||
- Recommendations
|
||
Explicitly check each acceptance criterion and verification item from plan.json tasks.
|
||
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on plan acceptance criteria, verification requirements, and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Method 1: Agent Review (current agent)
|
||
# - Read plan.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
|
||
# - Apply unified review criteria (see Shared Prompt Template)
|
||
# - Report findings directly
|
||
|
||
# Method 2: Gemini Review (recommended)
|
||
ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool gemini --mode analysis
|
||
# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
|
||
|
||
# Method 3: Qwen Review (alternative)
|
||
ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool qwen --mode analysis
|
||
# Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
|
||
|
||
# Method 4: Codex Review (git-aware) - Two mutually exclusive options:
|
||
|
||
# Option A: With custom prompt (reviews uncommitted by default)
|
||
ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool codex --mode review
|
||
# Use for complex reviews with specific focus areas
|
||
|
||
# Option B: Target flag only (no prompt allowed)
|
||
ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
|
||
# Quick review of uncommitted changes without custom instructions
|
||
|
||
# ⚠️ IMPORTANT: -p prompt and target flags (--uncommitted/--base/--commit) are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Multi-Round Review with Fixed IDs**:
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// Generate fixed review ID
|
||
const reviewId = `${sessionId}-review`
|
||
|
||
// First review pass with fixed ID
|
||
const reviewResult = Bash(`ccw cli -p "[Review prompt]" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}`)
|
||
|
||
// If issues found, continue review dialog with fixed ID chain
|
||
if (hasUnresolvedIssues(reviewResult)) {
|
||
// Resume with follow-up questions
|
||
Bash(`ccw cli -p "Clarify the security concerns you mentioned" --resume ${reviewId} --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}-followup`)
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Implementation Note**: Replace `[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]` placeholder with actual template content, substituting:
|
||
- `@{plan.json}` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`
|
||
- `[@{exploration.json}]` → exploration files from artifacts (if exists)
|
||
|
||
### Step 6: Update Development Index
|
||
|
||
**Trigger**: After all executions complete (regardless of code review)
|
||
|
||
**Skip Condition**: Skip if `.workflow/project-tech.json` does not exist
|
||
|
||
**Operations**:
|
||
```javascript
|
||
const projectJsonPath = '.workflow/project-tech.json'
|
||
if (!fileExists(projectJsonPath)) return // Silent skip
|
||
|
||
const projectJson = JSON.parse(Read(projectJsonPath))
|
||
|
||
// Initialize if needed
|
||
if (!projectJson.development_index) {
|
||
projectJson.development_index = { feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: [] }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Detect category from keywords
|
||
function detectCategory(text) {
|
||
text = text.toLowerCase()
|
||
if (/\b(fix|bug|error|issue|crash)\b/.test(text)) return 'bugfix'
|
||
if (/\b(refactor|cleanup|reorganize)\b/.test(text)) return 'refactor'
|
||
if (/\b(doc|readme|comment)\b/.test(text)) return 'docs'
|
||
if (/\b(add|new|create|implement)\b/.test(text)) return 'feature'
|
||
return 'enhancement'
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Detect sub_feature from task file paths
|
||
function detectSubFeature(tasks) {
|
||
const dirs = tasks.map(t => t.file?.split('/').slice(-2, -1)[0]).filter(Boolean)
|
||
const counts = dirs.reduce((a, d) => { a[d] = (a[d] || 0) + 1; return a }, {})
|
||
return Object.entries(counts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])[0]?.[0] || 'general'
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const category = detectCategory(`${planObject.summary} ${planObject.approach}`)
|
||
const entry = {
|
||
title: planObject.summary.slice(0, 60),
|
||
sub_feature: detectSubFeature(planObject.tasks),
|
||
date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],
|
||
description: planObject.approach.slice(0, 100),
|
||
status: previousExecutionResults.every(r => r.status === 'completed') ? 'completed' : 'partial',
|
||
session_id: executionContext?.session?.id || null
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
projectJson.development_index[category].push(entry)
|
||
projectJson.statistics.last_updated = new Date().toISOString()
|
||
Write(projectJsonPath, JSON.stringify(projectJson, null, 2))
|
||
|
||
console.log(`✓ Development index: [${category}] ${entry.title}`)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Best Practices
|
||
|
||
**Input Modes**: In-memory (lite-plan), prompt (standalone), file (JSON/text)
|
||
**Task Grouping**: Based on explicit depends_on only; independent tasks run in single parallel batch
|
||
**Execution**: All independent tasks launch concurrently via single Claude message with multiple tool calls
|
||
|
||
## Error Handling
|
||
|
||
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|
||
|-------|-------|------------|
|
||
| Missing executionContext | --in-memory without context | Error: "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." |
|
||
| File not found | File path doesn't exist | Error: "File not found: {path}. Check file path." |
|
||
| Empty file | File exists but no content | Error: "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
|
||
| Invalid Enhanced Task JSON | JSON missing required fields | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
|
||
| Malformed JSON | JSON parsing fails | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
|
||
| Execution failure | Agent/Codex crashes | Display error, use fixed ID `${sessionId}-${groupId}` for resume: `ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume <fixed-id> --id <fixed-id>-retry` |
|
||
| Execution timeout | CLI exceeded timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
|
||
| Codex unavailable | Codex not installed | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
|
||
| Fixed ID not found | Custom ID lookup failed | Check `ccw cli history`, verify date directories |
|
||
|
||
## Data Structures
|
||
|
||
### executionContext (Input - Mode 1)
|
||
|
||
Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
{
|
||
planObject: {
|
||
summary: string,
|
||
approach: string,
|
||
tasks: [...],
|
||
estimated_time: string,
|
||
recommended_execution: string,
|
||
complexity: string
|
||
},
|
||
explorationsContext: {...} | null, // Multi-angle explorations
|
||
explorationAngles: string[], // List of exploration angles
|
||
explorationManifest: {...} | null, // Exploration manifest
|
||
clarificationContext: {...} | null,
|
||
executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto", // 全局默认
|
||
codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Agent Review" | string,
|
||
originalUserInput: string,
|
||
|
||
// 任务级 executor 分配（优先于 executionMethod）
|
||
executorAssignments: {
|
||
[taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
// Session artifacts location (saved by lite-plan)
|
||
session: {
|
||
id: string, // Session identifier: {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
|
||
folder: string, // Session folder path: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
|
||
artifacts: {
|
||
explorations: [{angle, path}], // exploration-{angle}.json paths
|
||
explorations_manifest: string, // explorations-manifest.json path
|
||
plan: string // plan.json path (always present)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Artifact Usage**:
|
||
- Artifact files contain detailed planning context
|
||
- Pass artifact paths to CLI tools and agents for enhanced context
|
||
- See execution options below for usage examples
|
||
|
||
### executionResult (Output)
|
||
|
||
Collected after each execution call completes:
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
{
|
||
executionId: string, // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
|
||
status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
|
||
tasksSummary: string, // Brief description of tasks handled
|
||
completionSummary: string, // What was completed
|
||
keyOutputs: string, // Files created/modified, key changes
|
||
notes: string, // Important context for next execution
|
||
fixedCliId: string | null // Fixed CLI execution ID (e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1")
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Appended to `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity in multi-execution scenarios.
|
||
|
||
## Post-Completion Expansion
|
||
|
||
完成后询问用户是否扩展为issue(test/enhance/refactor/doc)，选中项调用 `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`
|
||
|
||
**Fixed ID Pattern**: `${sessionId}-${groupId}` enables predictable lookup without auto-generated timestamps.
|
||
|
||
**Resume Usage**: If `status` is "partial" or "failed", use `fixedCliId` to resume:
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Lookup previous execution
|
||
ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
|
||
|
||
# Resume with new fixed ID for retry
|
||
ccw cli -p "Continue from where we left off" --resume ${fixedCliId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedCliId}-retry
|
||
```
|