Files
Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/commands/ccw.md

679 lines
26 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
name: ccw
description: Main workflow orchestrator - analyze intent, select workflow, execute command chain in main process
argument-hint: "\"task description\""
allowed-tools: Skill(*), TodoWrite(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(*), Glob(*)
---
# CCW Command - Main Workflow Orchestrator
Main process orchestrator: intent analysis → workflow selection → command chain execution.
## Skill 映射
命令链中的 workflow 操作通过 `Skill()` 调用。
| Skill | 包含操作 |
|-------|---------|
| `workflow-lite-plan` | lite-plan, lite-execute |
| `workflow-plan` | plan, plan-verify, replan |
| `workflow-execute` | execute |
| `workflow-multi-cli-plan` | multi-cli-plan |
| `workflow-test-fix` | test-fix-gen, test-cycle-execute |
| `workflow-tdd` | tdd-plan, tdd-verify |
| `review-cycle` | review-session-cycle, review-module-cycle, review-cycle-fix |
| `brainstorm` | auto-parallel, artifacts, role-analysis, synthesis |
独立命令workflow:brainstorm-with-file, workflow:debug-with-file, workflow:analyze-with-file, issue:*
## Core Concept: Minimum Execution Units (最小执行单元)
**Definition**: A set of commands that must execute together as an atomic group to achieve a meaningful workflow milestone.
**Why This Matters**:
- **Prevents Incomplete States**: Avoid stopping after task generation without execution
- **User Experience**: User gets complete results, not intermediate artifacts requiring manual follow-up
- **Workflow Integrity**: Maintains logical coherence of multi-step operations
**Key Units in CCW**:
| Unit Type | Pattern | Example |
|-----------|---------|---------|
| **Planning + Execution** | plan-cmd → execute-cmd | lite-plan → lite-execute |
| **Testing** | test-gen-cmd → test-exec-cmd | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute |
| **Review** | review-cmd → fix-cmd | review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix |
**Atomic Rules**:
1. CCW automatically groups commands into minimum units - never splits them
2. Pipeline visualization shows units with `【 】` markers
3. Error handling preserves unit boundaries (retry/skip affects whole unit)
## Execution Model
**Synchronous (Main Process)**: Commands execute via Skill in main process, blocking until complete.
```
User Input → Analyze Intent → Select Workflow → [Confirm] → Execute Chain
Skill (blocking)
Update TodoWrite
Next Command...
```
**vs ccw-coordinator**: External CLI execution with background tasks and hook callbacks.
## 5-Phase Workflow
### Phase 1: Analyze Intent
```javascript
function analyzeIntent(input) {
return {
goal: extractGoal(input),
scope: extractScope(input),
constraints: extractConstraints(input),
task_type: detectTaskType(input), // bugfix|feature|tdd|review|exploration|...
complexity: assessComplexity(input), // low|medium|high
clarity_score: calculateClarity(input) // 0-3 (>=2 = clear)
};
}
// Task type detection (priority order)
function detectTaskType(text) {
const patterns = {
'bugfix-hotfix': /urgent|production|critical/ && /fix|bug/,
// With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
'brainstorm': /brainstorm|ideation|头脑风暴|创意|发散思维|creative thinking|multi-perspective.*think|compare perspectives|探索.*可能/,
'brainstorm-to-issue': /brainstorm.*issue|头脑风暴.*issue|idea.*issue|想法.*issue|从.*头脑风暴|convert.*brainstorm/,
'debug-file': /debug.*document|hypothesis.*debug|troubleshoot.*track|investigate.*log|调试.*记录|假设.*验证|systematic debug|深度调试/,
'analyze-file': /analyze.*document|explore.*concept|understand.*architecture|investigate.*discuss|collaborative analysis|分析.*讨论|深度.*理解|协作.*分析/,
// Standard workflows
'bugfix': /fix|bug|error|crash|fail|debug/,
'issue-batch': /issues?|batch/ && /fix|resolve/,
'issue-transition': /issue workflow|structured workflow|queue|multi-stage/,
'exploration': /uncertain|explore|research|what if/,
'quick-task': /quick|simple|small/ && /feature|function/,
'ui-design': /ui|design|component|style/,
'tdd': /tdd|test-driven|test first/,
'test-fix': /test fail|fix test|failing test/,
'review': /review|code review/,
'documentation': /docs|documentation|readme/
};
for (const [type, pattern] of Object.entries(patterns)) {
if (pattern.test(text)) return type;
}
return 'feature';
}
```
**Output**: `Type: [task_type] | Goal: [goal] | Complexity: [complexity] | Clarity: [clarity_score]/3`
---
### Phase 1.5: Requirement Clarification (if clarity_score < 2)
```javascript
async function clarifyRequirements(analysis) {
if (analysis.clarity_score >= 2) return analysis;
const questions = generateClarificationQuestions(analysis); // Goal, Scope, Constraints
const answers = await AskUserQuestion({ questions });
return updateAnalysis(analysis, answers);
}
```
**Questions**: Goal (Create/Fix/Optimize/Analyze), Scope (Single file/Module/Cross-module/System), Constraints (Backward compat/Skip tests/Urgent hotfix)
---
### Phase 2: Select Workflow & Build Command Chain
```javascript
function selectWorkflow(analysis) {
const levelMap = {
'bugfix-hotfix': { level: 2, flow: 'bugfix.hotfix' },
// With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
'brainstorm': { level: 4, flow: 'brainstorm-with-file' }, // Multi-perspective ideation
'brainstorm-to-issue': { level: 4, flow: 'brainstorm-to-issue' }, // Brainstorm → Issue workflow
'debug-file': { level: 3, flow: 'debug-with-file' }, // Hypothesis-driven debugging
'analyze-file': { level: 3, flow: 'analyze-with-file' }, // Collaborative analysis
// Standard workflows
'bugfix': { level: 2, flow: 'bugfix.standard' },
'issue-batch': { level: 'Issue', flow: 'issue' },
'issue-transition': { level: 2.5, flow: 'rapid-to-issue' }, // Bridge workflow
'exploration': { level: 4, flow: 'full' },
'quick-task': { level: 2, flow: 'rapid' },
'ui-design': { level: analysis.complexity === 'high' ? 4 : 3, flow: 'ui' },
'tdd': { level: 3, flow: 'tdd' },
'test-fix': { level: 3, flow: 'test-fix-gen' },
'review': { level: 3, flow: 'review-cycle-fix' },
'documentation': { level: 2, flow: 'docs' },
'feature': { level: analysis.complexity === 'high' ? 3 : 2, flow: analysis.complexity === 'high' ? 'coupled' : 'rapid' }
};
const selected = levelMap[analysis.task_type] || levelMap['feature'];
return buildCommandChain(selected, analysis);
}
// Build command chain (port-based matching with Minimum Execution Units)
function buildCommandChain(workflow, analysis) {
const chains = {
// Level 2 - Lightweight
'rapid': [
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'quick-impl' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
// Level 2 Bridge - Lightweight to Issue Workflow
'rapid-to-issue': [
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → convert-to-plan】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl-to-issue' },
{ cmd: '/issue:convert-to-plan', args: '--latest-lite-plan -y', unit: 'quick-impl-to-issue' },
// Auto-continue to issue workflow
{ cmd: '/issue:queue', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/issue:execute', args: '--queue auto' }
],
'bugfix.standard': [
// Unit: Bug Fix【lite-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `--bugfix "${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'bug-fix' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'bug-fix' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
'bugfix.hotfix': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `--hotfix "${analysis.goal}"` }
],
'multi-cli-plan': [
// Unit: Multi-CLI Planning【multi-cli-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:multi-cli-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'multi-cli' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'multi-cli' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
'docs': [
// Unit: Quick Implementation【lite-plan → lite-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'quick-impl' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:lite-execute', args: '--in-memory', unit: 'quick-impl' }
],
// With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
'brainstorm-with-file': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:brainstorm-with-file', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
// Note: Has built-in post-completion options (create plan, create issue, deep analysis)
],
// Brainstorm-to-Issue workflow (bridge from brainstorm to issue execution)
'brainstorm-to-issue': [
// Note: Assumes brainstorm session already exists, or run brainstorm first
{ cmd: '/issue:from-brainstorm', args: `SESSION="${extractBrainstormSession(analysis)}" --auto` },
{ cmd: '/issue:queue', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/issue:execute', args: '--queue auto' }
],
'debug-with-file': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:debug-with-file', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
// Note: Self-contained with hypothesis-driven iteration and Gemini validation
],
'analyze-with-file': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:analyze-with-file', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` }
// Note: Self-contained with multi-round discussion and CLI exploration
],
// Level 3 - Standard
'coupled': [
// Unit: Verified Planning【plan → plan-verify】
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'verified-planning' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
// Execution
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
// Unit: Code Review【review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix】
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-cycle-fix', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
...(analysis.constraints?.includes('skip-tests') ? [] : [
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
])
],
'tdd': [
// Unit: TDD Planning + Execution【tdd-plan → execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-plan', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'tdd-planning' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '', unit: 'tdd-planning' },
// TDD Verification
{ cmd: '/workflow:tdd-verify', args: '' }
],
'test-fix-gen': [
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: `"${analysis.goal}"`, unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
],
'review-cycle-fix': [
// Unit: Code Review【review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix】
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-session-cycle', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:review-cycle-fix', args: '', unit: 'code-review' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
],
'ui': [
{ cmd: '/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
// Unit: Planning + Execution【plan → execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '', unit: 'plan-execute' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '', unit: 'plan-execute' }
],
// Level 4 - Brainstorm
'full': [
{ cmd: '/brainstorm', args: `"${analysis.goal}"` },
// Unit: Verified Planning【plan → plan-verify】
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:plan-verify', args: '', unit: 'verified-planning' },
// Execution
{ cmd: '/workflow:execute', args: '' },
// Unit: Test Validation【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-fix-gen', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' },
{ cmd: '/workflow:test-cycle-execute', args: '', unit: 'test-validation' }
],
// Issue Workflow
'issue': [
{ cmd: '/issue:discover', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/issue:plan', args: '--all-pending' },
{ cmd: '/issue:queue', args: '' },
{ cmd: '/issue:execute', args: '' }
]
};
return chains[workflow.flow] || chains['rapid'];
}
```
**Output**: `Level [X] - [flow] | Pipeline: [...] | Commands: [1. /cmd1 2. /cmd2 ...]`
---
### Phase 3: User Confirmation
```javascript
async function getUserConfirmation(chain) {
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Execute this command chain?",
header: "Confirm",
options: [
{ label: "Confirm", description: "Start" },
{ label: "Adjust", description: "Modify" },
{ label: "Cancel", description: "Abort" }
]
}]
});
if (response.error === "Cancel") throw new Error("Cancelled");
if (response.error === "Adjust") return await adjustChain(chain);
return chain;
}
```
---
### Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
```javascript
function setupTodoTracking(chain, workflow, analysis) {
const sessionId = `ccw-${Date.now()}`;
const stateDir = `.workflow/.ccw/${sessionId}`;
Bash(`mkdir -p "${stateDir}"`);
const todos = chain.map((step, i) => ({
content: `CCW:${workflow}: [${i + 1}/${chain.length}] ${step.cmd}`,
status: i === 0 ? 'in_progress' : 'pending',
activeForm: `Executing ${step.cmd}`
}));
TodoWrite({ todos });
// Initialize status.json for hook tracking
const state = {
session_id: sessionId,
workflow: workflow,
status: 'running',
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
analysis: analysis,
command_chain: chain.map((step, idx) => ({
index: idx,
command: step.cmd,
status: idx === 0 ? 'running' : 'pending'
})),
current_index: 0
};
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
return { sessionId, stateDir, state };
}
```
**Output**:
- TODO: `-> CCW:rapid: [1/3] /workflow:lite-plan | CCW:rapid: [2/3] /workflow:lite-execute | ...`
- Status File: `.workflow/.ccw/{session_id}/status.json`
---
### Phase 5: Execute Command Chain
```javascript
async function executeCommandChain(chain, workflow, trackingState) {
let previousResult = null;
const { sessionId, stateDir, state } = trackingState;
for (let i = 0; i < chain.length; i++) {
try {
// Update status: mark current as running
state.command_chain[i].status = 'running';
state.current_index = i;
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
const fullCommand = assembleCommand(chain[i], previousResult);
const result = await Skill({ skill: fullCommand });
previousResult = { ...result, success: true };
// Update status: mark current as completed, next as running
state.command_chain[i].status = 'completed';
if (i + 1 < chain.length) {
state.command_chain[i + 1].status = 'running';
}
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
updateTodoStatus(i, chain.length, workflow, 'completed');
} catch (error) {
// Update status on error
state.command_chain[i].status = 'failed';
state.status = 'error';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
const action = await handleError(chain[i], error, i);
if (action === 'retry') {
state.command_chain[i].status = 'pending';
state.status = 'running';
i--; // Retry
} else if (action === 'abort') {
state.status = 'failed';
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
return { success: false, error: error.message };
}
// 'skip' - continue
state.status = 'running';
}
}
// Mark workflow as completed
state.status = 'completed';
state.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
Write(`${stateDir}/status.json`, JSON.stringify(state, null, 2));
return { success: true, completed: chain.length, sessionId };
}
// Assemble full command with session/plan parameters
function assembleCommand(step, previousResult) {
let command = step.cmd;
if (step.args) {
command += ` ${step.args}`;
} else if (previousResult?.session_id) {
command += ` --session="${previousResult.session_id}"`;
}
return command;
}
// Update TODO: mark current as complete, next as in-progress
function updateTodoStatus(index, total, workflow, status) {
const todos = getAllCurrentTodos();
const updated = todos.map(todo => {
if (todo.content.startsWith(`CCW:${workflow}:`)) {
const stepNum = extractStepIndex(todo.content);
if (stepNum === index + 1) return { ...todo, status };
if (stepNum === index + 2 && status === 'completed') return { ...todo, status: 'in_progress' };
}
return todo;
});
TodoWrite({ todos: updated });
}
// Error handling: Retry/Skip/Abort
async function handleError(step, error, index) {
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: `${step.cmd} failed: ${error.message}`,
header: "Error",
options: [
{ label: "Retry", description: "Re-execute" },
{ label: "Skip", description: "Continue next" },
{ label: "Abort", description: "Stop" }
]
}]
});
return { Retry: 'retry', Skip: 'skip', Abort: 'abort' }[response.Error] || 'abort';
}
```
---
## Execution Flow Summary
```
User Input
|
Phase 1: Analyze Intent
|-- Extract: goal, scope, constraints, task_type, complexity, clarity
+-- If clarity < 2 -> Phase 1.5: Clarify Requirements
|
Phase 2: Select Workflow & Build Chain
|-- Map task_type -> Level (1/2/3/4/Issue)
|-- Select flow based on complexity
+-- Build command chain (port-based)
|
Phase 3: User Confirmation (optional)
|-- Show pipeline visualization
+-- Allow adjustment
|
Phase 4: Setup TODO Tracking & Status File
|-- Create todos with CCW prefix
+-- Initialize .workflow/.ccw/{session_id}/status.json
|
Phase 5: Execute Command Chain
|-- For each command:
| |-- Update status.json (current=running)
| |-- Assemble full command
| |-- Execute via Skill
| |-- Update status.json (current=completed, next=running)
| |-- Update TODO status
| +-- Handle errors (retry/skip/abort)
+-- Mark status.json as completed
```
---
## Pipeline Examples (with Minimum Execution Units)
**Note**: `【 】` marks Minimum Execution Units - commands execute together as atomic groups.
| Input | Type | Level | Pipeline (with Units) |
|-------|------|-------|-----------------------|
| "Add API endpoint" | feature (low) | 2 |【lite-plan → lite-execute】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
| "Fix login timeout" | bugfix | 2 |【lite-plan → lite-execute】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
| "Use issue workflow" | issue-transition | 2.5 |【lite-plan → convert-to-plan】→ queue → execute |
| "头脑风暴: 通知系统重构" | brainstorm | 4 | brainstorm-with-file → (built-in post-completion) |
| "从头脑风暴创建 issue" | brainstorm-to-issue | 4 | from-brainstorm → queue → execute |
| "深度调试 WebSocket 连接断开" | debug-file | 3 | debug-with-file → (hypothesis iteration) |
| "协作分析: 认证架构优化" | analyze-file | 3 | analyze-with-file → (multi-round discussion) |
| "OAuth2 system" | feature (high) | 3 |【plan → plan-verify】→ execute →【review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix】→【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
| "Implement with TDD" | tdd | 3 |【tdd-plan → execute】→ tdd-verify |
| "Uncertain: real-time arch" | exploration | 4 | brainstorm →【plan → plan-verify】→ execute →【test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute】|
---
## Key Design Principles
1. **Main Process Execution** - Use Skill in main process, no external CLI
2. **Intent-Driven** - Auto-select workflow based on task intent
3. **Port-Based Chaining** - Build command chain using port matching
4. **Minimum Execution Units** - Commands grouped into atomic units, never split (e.g., lite-plan → lite-execute)
5. **Progressive Clarification** - Low clarity triggers clarification phase
6. **TODO Tracking** - Use CCW prefix to isolate workflow todos
7. **Unit-Aware Error Handling** - Retry/skip/abort affects whole unit, not individual commands
8. **User Control** - Optional user confirmation at each phase
---
## State Management
### Dual Tracking System
**1. TodoWrite-Based Tracking** (UI Display): All execution state tracked via TodoWrite with `CCW:` prefix.
```javascript
// Initial state
todos = [
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [1/3] /workflow:lite-plan", status: "in_progress" },
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [2/3] /workflow:lite-execute", status: "pending" },
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [3/3] /workflow:test-cycle-execute", status: "pending" }
];
// After command 1 completes
todos = [
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [1/3] /workflow:lite-plan", status: "completed" },
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [2/3] /workflow:lite-execute", status: "in_progress" },
{ content: "CCW:rapid: [3/3] /workflow:test-cycle-execute", status: "pending" }
];
```
**2. Status.json Tracking**: Persistent state file for workflow monitoring.
**Location**: `.workflow/.ccw/{session_id}/status.json`
**Structure**:
```json
{
"session_id": "ccw-1706123456789",
"workflow": "rapid",
"status": "running|completed|failed|error",
"created_at": "2025-02-01T10:30:00Z",
"updated_at": "2025-02-01T10:35:00Z",
"analysis": {
"goal": "Add user authentication",
"scope": ["auth"],
"constraints": [],
"task_type": "feature",
"complexity": "medium"
},
"command_chain": [
{
"index": 0,
"command": "/workflow:lite-plan",
"status": "completed"
},
{
"index": 1,
"command": "/workflow:lite-execute",
"status": "running"
},
{
"index": 2,
"command": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"status": "pending"
}
],
"current_index": 1
}
```
**Status Values**:
- `running`: Workflow executing commands
- `completed`: All commands finished
- `failed`: User aborted or unrecoverable error
- `error`: Command execution failed (during error handling)
**Command Status Values**:
- `pending`: Not started
- `running`: Currently executing
- `completed`: Successfully finished
- `failed`: Execution failed
---
## With-File Workflows
**With-File workflows** provide documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration. They are self-contained and generate comprehensive session artifacts.
| Workflow | Purpose | Key Features | Output Folder |
|----------|---------|--------------|---------------|
| **brainstorm-with-file** | Multi-perspective ideation | Gemini/Codex/Claude perspectives, diverge-converge cycles | `.workflow/.brainstorm/` |
| **debug-with-file** | Hypothesis-driven debugging | Gemini validation, understanding evolution, NDJSON logging | `.workflow/.debug/` |
| **analyze-with-file** | Collaborative analysis | Multi-round Q&A, CLI exploration, documented discussions | `.workflow/.analysis/` |
**Detection Keywords**:
- **brainstorm**: 头脑风暴, 创意, 发散思维, multi-perspective, compare perspectives
- **debug-file**: 深度调试, 假设验证, systematic debug, hypothesis debug
- **analyze-file**: 协作分析, 深度理解, collaborative analysis, explore concept
**Characteristics**:
1. **Self-Contained**: Each workflow handles its own iteration loop
2. **Documented Process**: Creates evolving documents (brainstorm.md, understanding.md, discussion.md)
3. **Multi-CLI**: Uses Gemini/Codex/Claude for different perspectives
4. **Built-in Post-Completion**: Offers follow-up options (create plan, issue, etc.)
---
## Usage
```bash
# Auto-select workflow
/ccw "Add user authentication"
# Complex requirement (triggers clarification)
/ccw "Optimize system performance"
# Bug fix
/ccw "Fix memory leak in WebSocket handler"
# TDD development
/ccw "Implement user registration with TDD"
# Exploratory task
/ccw "Uncertain about architecture for real-time notifications"
# With-File workflows (documented exploration with multi-CLI collaboration)
/ccw "头脑风暴: 用户通知系统重新设计" # → brainstorm-with-file
/ccw "从头脑风暴 BS-通知系统-2025-01-28 创建 issue" # → brainstorm-to-issue (bridge)
/ccw "深度调试: 系统随机崩溃问题" # → debug-with-file
/ccw "协作分析: 理解现有认证架构的设计决策" # → analyze-with-file
```