mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-12 02:37:45 +08:00
- Create intelligent-tools.md as strategic guide for tool selection - Reference intelligent-tools.md from CLAUDE.md for global access - Add three analysis levels to plan.md (quick/standard/deep) - Separate tool selection strategy from plan command implementation - Maintain clear separation of concerns between strategy and execution 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
87 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
87 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: intelligent-tools
|
|
description: Strategic tool selection guide - references unified tool documentation
|
|
type: strategic-guideline
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Intelligent Tools Selection Strategy
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
This document provides strategic guidance for selecting the appropriate analysis tool based on task characteristics and project requirements.
|
|
|
|
## Tool Documentation References
|
|
- **Gemini CLI**: @~/.claude/workflows/gemini-unified.md
|
|
- **Codex CLI**: @~/.claude/workflows/codex-unified.md
|
|
|
|
## Tool Characteristics Comparison
|
|
|
|
### Gemini
|
|
- **Strengths**:
|
|
- Large context window for analyzing many files simultaneously
|
|
- Excellent pattern recognition across modules
|
|
- Superior for architectural and structural analysis
|
|
- **Optimal Use Cases**:
|
|
- Large codebase analysis (>50 files)
|
|
- Cross-module pattern detection
|
|
- Coding convention analysis
|
|
- Refactoring with broad dependencies
|
|
|
|
### Codex
|
|
- **Strengths**:
|
|
- Superior mathematical and algorithmic reasoning
|
|
- Deeper technical knowledge base
|
|
- Better for focused, deep analysis
|
|
- **Optimal Use Cases**:
|
|
- Complex algorithm analysis
|
|
- Security vulnerability assessment
|
|
- Performance optimization
|
|
- Database schema design
|
|
- API protocol specifications
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Selection Matrix
|
|
|
|
| Analysis Need | Recommended Tool | Rationale |
|
|
|--------------|------------------|-----------|
|
|
| Project Architecture | Gemini | Needs broad context across many files |
|
|
| Algorithm Optimization | Codex | Requires deep mathematical reasoning |
|
|
| Security Analysis | Codex | Leverages deeper security knowledge |
|
|
| Code Patterns | Gemini | Pattern recognition across modules |
|
|
| Refactoring | Gemini | Needs understanding of all dependencies |
|
|
| API Design | Codex | Technical specification expertise |
|
|
| Test Coverage | Gemini | Cross-module test understanding |
|
|
| Performance Tuning | Codex | Mathematical optimization capabilities |
|
|
|
|
## Parallel Analysis Strategy
|
|
|
|
For complex projects requiring both broad context and deep analysis:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Use Task agents to run both tools in parallel
|
|
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
prompt="Use Gemini (see @~/.claude/workflows/gemini-unified.md) for architectural analysis")
|
|
+
|
|
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
prompt="Use Codex (see @~/.claude/workflows/codex-unified.md) for algorithmic analysis")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Guidelines
|
|
|
|
1. **Default Selection**: Let project characteristics drive tool choice
|
|
2. **Complexity Thresholds**:
|
|
- Simple projects (≤50 files): Either tool based on content type
|
|
- Medium projects (50-200 files): Gemini for overview, Codex for specifics
|
|
- Large projects (>200 files): Parallel analysis with both tools
|
|
|
|
3. **Content-Based Selection**:
|
|
- Mathematical/algorithmic content → Codex
|
|
- Architectural/structural content → Gemini
|
|
- Mixed content → Both via Task agents
|
|
|
|
## Usage in Commands
|
|
|
|
Commands should reference this strategy guide for tool selection decisions.
|
|
Specific tool usage syntax and examples are documented in their respective unified guides.
|
|
|
|
**See also**:
|
|
- Gemini detailed usage: @~/.claude/workflows/gemini-unified.md
|
|
- Codex detailed usage: @~/.claude/workflows/codex-unified.md |