mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
- Add task saturation assessment to merge preparation with execution when appropriate - Optimize complexity thresholds: <3/<8 saturated tasks instead of <5/<15 - Enhance JSON schema with preparation_complexity, preparation_tasks, estimated_prep_time - Update execute.md to handle merged tasks with PREPARATION_INCLUDED marker - Add document reference paths for execution phase - Reduce task fragmentation while preserving complex preparation when needed 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
183 lines
6.7 KiB
Markdown
183 lines
6.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: plan
|
|
description: Create implementation plans with intelligent input detection
|
|
usage: /workflow:plan <input>
|
|
argument-hint: "text description"|file.md|ISS-001|template-name
|
|
examples:
|
|
- /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
|
|
- /workflow:plan requirements.md
|
|
- /workflow:plan ISS-001
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Workflow Plan Command (/workflow:plan)
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
Creates actionable implementation plans with intelligent input source detection. Supports text, files, issues, and templates through automatic recognition.
|
|
|
|
## Core Principles
|
|
**File Structure:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
```bash
|
|
/workflow:plan [--AM gemini|codex] <input>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Analysis Method Flag (--AM)
|
|
Optional flag to specify which CLI tool to use for context analysis:
|
|
- **gemini** (default): Uses Gemini CLI for pattern-based analysis and architectural understanding
|
|
- **codex**: Uses Codex CLI for autonomous development context gathering with intelligent file discovery
|
|
|
|
**Examples**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
/workflow:plan --AM codex "Build authentication system"
|
|
/workflow:plan --AM gemini requirements.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Input Detection Logic
|
|
The command automatically detects input type:
|
|
|
|
### File Input (Auto-detected)
|
|
```bash
|
|
/workflow:plan requirements.md
|
|
/workflow:plan config.json
|
|
```
|
|
**Triggers**: Extensions: .md, .txt, .json, .yaml, .yml
|
|
**Processing**: Reads file contents and extracts requirements
|
|
|
|
### Issue Input (Auto-detected)
|
|
```bash
|
|
/workflow:plan ISS-001
|
|
/workflow:plan ISSUE-123
|
|
```
|
|
**Triggers**: Patterns: ISS-*, ISSUE-*, *-request-*
|
|
**Processing**: Loads issue data and acceptance criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Text Input (Default)
|
|
```bash
|
|
/workflow:plan "Build user authentication with JWT and OAuth2"
|
|
```
|
|
**Triggers**: Everything else
|
|
**Processing**: Parse natural language requirements
|
|
|
|
## Automatic Behaviors
|
|
|
|
### Session Management
|
|
- Creates new session if none exists
|
|
- Uses active session if available
|
|
- Generates session ID: WFS-[topic-slug]
|
|
|
|
### Complexity Detection with Saturation
|
|
- **Simple**: <3 saturated tasks → Direct IMPL_PLAN.md
|
|
- **Medium**: 3-8 saturated tasks → IMPL_PLAN.md + TODO_LIST.md
|
|
- **Complex**: >8 saturated tasks → Full decomposition
|
|
|
|
**Note**: 1 complex preparation task = 0.5 saturated task for counting
|
|
|
|
### Task Generation with Saturation Control
|
|
- **Task Saturation Assessment**: Evaluates whether to merge preparation and execution
|
|
- **Default merge mode**: "Analyze and implement X" instead of "Analyze X" + "Implement X"
|
|
- **Smart splitting**: Only separate when preparation complexity > threshold
|
|
- Automatically creates .task/ files when complexity warrants
|
|
- Generates hierarchical task structure (max 2 levels)
|
|
- Main tasks with subtasks become container tasks (not directly executable)
|
|
- Updates session state with task references
|
|
- Runs project structure analysis to populate paths field
|
|
|
|
### Task Saturation Assessment
|
|
Evaluates whether to merge preparation and execution:
|
|
|
|
**Merge Conditions** (Saturated Tasks):
|
|
- Preparation work < 30min estimated
|
|
- Analysis scope ≤ 3 files
|
|
- No complex dependencies
|
|
- Single module operation
|
|
|
|
**Separate Preparation Conditions**:
|
|
- Cross-module architecture analysis (>5 modules)
|
|
- Deep performance analysis or security audit required
|
|
- Database migration design needed
|
|
- Third-party API integration research
|
|
|
|
**Task Examples**:
|
|
- **Saturated**: "IMPL-001: Analyze auth patterns and implement JWT token management"
|
|
- **Split needed**: "IMPL-001: Design cross-service auth architecture" + "IMPL-002: Implement auth service"
|
|
|
|
### Task Breakdown Process
|
|
- **Automatic decomposition**: Tasks with complexity >5 are broken into subtasks (impl-N.M format)
|
|
- **Container tasks**: Parent tasks with subtasks become containers (marked with ▸ in TODO_LIST)
|
|
- **Smart decomposition**: AI analyzes task title to suggest logical subtask structure
|
|
- **Context inheritance**: Subtasks inherit parent's requirements and scope, refined for specific needs
|
|
- **Agent assignment**: Automatic agent mapping based on subtask type (planning/code/test/review)
|
|
- **Maximum depth**: 2 levels (impl-N.M) to maintain manageable hierarchy
|
|
|
|
### Implementation Field Requirements
|
|
- **analysis_source**: Determines context gathering method (manual|auto-detected|gemini|codex)
|
|
- **Auto-assignment**: manual (user provides details) → auto-detected (system infers) → gemini/codex (needs analysis)
|
|
- **Required fields**: files (with path/location/modifications), context_notes, analysis_source
|
|
- **Paths format**: Semicolon-separated list (e.g., "src/auth;tests/auth;config/auth.json")
|
|
|
|
## Session Check Process
|
|
⚠️ **CRITICAL**: Check for existing active session before planning
|
|
|
|
1. **Check Active Session**: Check for `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
|
|
2. **Session Selection**: Use existing active session or create new
|
|
3. **Context Integration**: Load session state and existing context
|
|
|
|
## Output Documents
|
|
|
|
### Document References for Execution
|
|
|
|
#### Primary References
|
|
- **Planning Document**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/IMPL_PLAN.md`
|
|
- Used by: `/workflow:execute` for context loading
|
|
- Contains: Requirements, task overview, success criteria
|
|
|
|
- **Task Definitions**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/.task/impl-*.json`
|
|
- Used by: Agents for implementation context
|
|
- Contains: Complete task details with implementation field including preparation_complexity
|
|
|
|
- **Progress Tracking**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/TODO_LIST.md`
|
|
- Used by: `/workflow:execute` for status tracking
|
|
- Updated by: Agents after task completion
|
|
|
|
### IMPL_PLAN.md (Always Created)
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Implementation Plan - [Project Name]
|
|
*Generated from: [input_source]*
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
[Extracted requirements from input source]
|
|
|
|
## Task Breakdown
|
|
- **IMPL-001**: [Saturated task description with merged preparation and execution]
|
|
- **IMPL-002**: [Task description]
|
|
|
|
## Success Criteria
|
|
[Measurable completion conditions]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Optional TODO_LIST.md (Auto-triggered)
|
|
Created when complexity > simple or task count > 5
|
|
|
|
**TODO_LIST Structure**: Uses unified hierarchical list format
|
|
- Container tasks (with subtasks) marked with `▸` symbol
|
|
- Leaf tasks use standard `- [ ]` / `- [x]` checkboxes
|
|
- Indentation shows hierarchy (2 spaces per level)
|
|
- Container tasks represent logical grouping, not executable items
|
|
|
|
### Task JSON Files (Auto-created)
|
|
Generated in .task/ directory when decomposition enabled
|
|
|
|
## Error Handling
|
|
|
|
### Input Processing Errors
|
|
- **File not found**: Clear error message with suggestions
|
|
- **Invalid issue**: Verify issue ID exists
|
|
- **Unknown template**: List available templates
|
|
- **Empty input**: Prompt for valid input
|
|
- **Vague text input**: Auto-reject without guidance
|
|
- Rejected examples: "do something", "fix it", "make it better", "add feature"
|
|
- Response: Direct rejection message, no further assistance
|
|
|
|
**System ensures**: Unified planning interface with intelligent input detection and automatic complexity handling |