- Delete 21 old team skill directories using CSV-wave pipeline pattern (~100+ files) - Delete old team-lifecycle (v3) and team-planex-v2 - Create generic team-worker.toml and team-supervisor.toml (replacing tlv4-specific TOMLs) - Convert 19 team skills from Claude Code format (Agent/SendMessage/TaskCreate) to Codex format (spawn_agent/wait_agent/tasks.json/request_user_input) - Update team-lifecycle-v4 to use generic agent types (team_worker/team_supervisor) - Convert all coordinator role files: dispatch.md, monitor.md, role.md - Convert all worker role files: remove run_in_background, fix Bash syntax - Convert all specs/pipelines.md references - Final state: 20 team skills, 217 .md files, zero Claude Code API residuals Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.2 KiB
Pipeline Definitions
1. Pipeline Selection Criteria
| Keywords | Pipeline |
|---|---|
| spec, design, document, requirements | spec-only |
| implement, build, fix, code | impl-only |
| full, lifecycle, end-to-end | full-lifecycle |
| frontend, UI, react, vue | fe-only or fullstack |
| Ambiguous / unclear | request_user_input |
2. Spec-Only Pipeline
6 tasks + 2 optional checkpoints
RESEARCH-001 -> DRAFT-001 -> DRAFT-002 -> [CHECKPOINT-001] -> DRAFT-003 -> DRAFT-004 -> [CHECKPOINT-002] -> QUALITY-001
| Task | Role | Description |
|---|---|---|
| RESEARCH-001 | analyst | Research domain, competitors, constraints |
| DRAFT-001 | writer | Product brief, self-validate |
| DRAFT-002 | writer | Requirements PRD |
| CHECKPOINT-001 | supervisor | Brief<->PRD consistency, terminology alignment |
| DRAFT-003 | writer | Architecture design, self-validate |
| DRAFT-004 | writer | Epics & stories, self-validate |
| CHECKPOINT-002 | supervisor | Full spec consistency (4 docs), quality trend |
| QUALITY-001 | reviewer | Quality gate scoring |
Checkpoint: After QUALITY-001 -- pause for user approval before any implementation.
Supervision opt-out: Set supervision: false in tasks.json to skip CHECKPOINT tasks.
3. Impl-Only Pipeline
4 tasks + 1 optional checkpoint
PLAN-001 -> [CHECKPOINT-003] -> IMPL-001 -> TEST-001 + REVIEW-001
| Task | Role | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PLAN-001 | planner | Break down into implementation steps, assess complexity |
| CHECKPOINT-003 | supervisor | Plan<->input alignment, complexity sanity check |
| IMPL-001 | implementer | Execute implementation plan |
| TEST-001 | tester | Validate against acceptance criteria |
| REVIEW-001 | reviewer | Code review |
TEST-001 and REVIEW-001 run in parallel after IMPL-001 completes.
Supervision opt-out: Set supervision: false in tasks.json to skip CHECKPOINT tasks.
4. Full-Lifecycle Pipeline
10 tasks + 3 optional checkpoints = spec-only (6+2) + impl (4+1)
[Spec pipeline with CHECKPOINT-001/002] -> PLAN-001(blockedBy: QUALITY-001) -> [CHECKPOINT-003] -> IMPL-001 -> TEST-001 + REVIEW-001
PLAN-001 is blocked until QUALITY-001 passes and user approves the checkpoint.
Supervision opt-out: Set supervision: false in tasks.json to skip all CHECKPOINT tasks.
5. Frontend Pipelines
| Pipeline | Description |
|---|---|
fe-only |
Frontend implementation only: PLAN-001 -> IMPL-001 (fe-implementer) -> TEST-001 + REVIEW-001 |
fullstack |
Backend + frontend: PLAN-001 -> IMPL-001 (backend) + IMPL-002 (frontend) -> TEST-001 + REVIEW-001 |
full-lifecycle-fe |
Full spec pipeline -> fullstack impl pipeline |
6. Conditional Routing
PLAN-001 outputs a complexity assessment that determines the impl topology.
| Complexity | Modules | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Low | 1-2 | PLAN-001 -> IMPL-001 -> TEST + REVIEW |
| Medium | 3-4 | PLAN-001 -> ORCH-001 -> IMPL-{1..N} (parallel) -> TEST + REVIEW |
| High | 5+ | PLAN-001 -> ARCH-001 -> ORCH-001 -> IMPL-{1..N} -> TEST + REVIEW |
- ORCH-001 (orchestrator): Coordinates parallel IMPL tasks, manages dependencies
- ARCH-001 (architect): Detailed architecture decisions before orchestration
7. Task Metadata Registry
| Task ID | Role | Phase | Depends On | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RESEARCH-001 | analyst | research | - | P0 |
| DRAFT-001 | writer | product-brief | RESEARCH-001 | P0 |
| DRAFT-002 | writer | requirements | DRAFT-001 | P0 |
| DRAFT-003 | writer | architecture | DRAFT-002 | P0 |
| DRAFT-004 | writer | epics | DRAFT-003 | P0 |
| QUALITY-001 | reviewer | readiness | CHECKPOINT-002 (or DRAFT-004) | P0 |
| CHECKPOINT-001 | supervisor | checkpoint | DRAFT-002 | P1 |
| CHECKPOINT-002 | supervisor | checkpoint | DRAFT-004 | P1 |
| CHECKPOINT-003 | supervisor | checkpoint | PLAN-001 | P1 |
| PLAN-001 | planner | planning | QUALITY-001 (or user input) | P0 |
| ARCH-001 | architect | arch-detail | PLAN-001 | P1 |
| ORCH-001 | orchestrator | orchestration | PLAN-001 or ARCH-001 | P1 |
| IMPL-001 | implementer | implementation | PLAN-001 or ORCH-001 | P0 |
| IMPL-{N} | implementer | implementation | ORCH-001 | P0 |
| TEST-001 | tester | validation | IMPL-* | P0 |
| REVIEW-001 | reviewer | review | IMPL-* | P0 |
8. Dynamic Specialist Injection
When task content or user request matches trigger keywords, inject a specialist task.
| Trigger Keywords | Specialist Role | Task Prefix | Priority | Insert After |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| security, vulnerability, OWASP | security-expert | SECURITY-* | P0 | PLAN |
| performance, optimization, latency | performance-optimizer | PERF-* | P1 | IMPL |
| data, pipeline, ETL, migration | data-engineer | DATA-* | P0 | parallel with IMPL |
| devops, CI/CD, deployment, infra | devops-engineer | DEVOPS-* | P1 | IMPL |
| ML, model, training, inference | ml-engineer | ML-* | P0 | parallel with IMPL |
Injection rules:
- Specialist tasks inherit the session context and wisdom
- They write discoveries/{task_id}.json on completion like any other task
- P0 specialists block downstream tasks; P1 run in parallel