mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
重构 ccw cli 模板系统: - 新增 template-discovery.ts 模块,支持扁平化模板自动发现 - 添加 --rule <template> 选项,自动加载 protocol 和 template - 模板目录从嵌套结构 (prompts/category/file.txt) 迁移到扁平结构 (prompts/category-function.txt) - 更新所有 agent/command 文件,使用 $PROTO $TMPL 环境变量替代 $(cat ...) 模式 - 支持模糊匹配:--rule 02-review-architecture 可匹配 analysis-review-architecture.txt 其他更新: - Dashboard: 添加 Claude Manager 和 Issue Manager 页面 - Codex-lens: 增强 chain_search 和 clustering 模块 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
523 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
523 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: ccw
|
||
description: Stateless workflow orchestrator. Auto-selects optimal workflow based on task intent. Triggers "ccw", "workflow".
|
||
allowed-tools: Task(*), SlashCommand(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Grep(*), TodoWrite(*)
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# CCW - Claude Code Workflow Orchestrator
|
||
|
||
无状态工作流协调器,根据任务意图自动选择最优工作流。
|
||
|
||
## Workflow System Overview
|
||
|
||
CCW 提供两个工作流系统:**Main Workflow** 和 **Issue Workflow**,协同覆盖完整的软件开发生命周期。
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Main Workflow │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ Level 1 │ → │ Level 2 │ → │ Level 3 │ → │ Level 4 │ │
|
||
│ │ Rapid │ │ Lightweight │ │ Standard │ │ Brainstorm │ │
|
||
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
|
||
│ │ lite-lite- │ │ lite-plan │ │ plan │ │ brainstorm │ │
|
||
│ │ lite │ │ lite-fix │ │ tdd-plan │ │ :auto- │ │
|
||
│ │ │ │ multi-cli- │ │ test-fix- │ │ parallel │ │
|
||
│ │ │ │ plan │ │ gen │ │ ↓ │ │
|
||
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ plan │ │
|
||
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Complexity: ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━▶ │
|
||
│ Low High │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
│
|
||
│ After development
|
||
▼
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Issue Workflow │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ Accumulate │ → │ Plan │ → │ Execute │ │
|
||
│ │ Discover & │ │ Batch │ │ Parallel │ │
|
||
│ │ Collect │ │ Planning │ │ Execution │ │
|
||
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Supplementary role: Maintain main branch stability, worktree isolation │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Architecture
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ CCW Orchestrator (CLI-Enhanced + Requirement Analysis) │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ Phase 1 │ Input Analysis (rule-based, fast path) │
|
||
│ Phase 1.5 │ CLI Classification (semantic, smart path) │
|
||
│ Phase 1.75 │ Requirement Clarification (clarity < 2) │
|
||
│ Phase 2 │ Level Selection (intent → level → workflow) │
|
||
│ Phase 2.5 │ CLI Action Planning (high complexity) │
|
||
│ Phase 3 │ User Confirmation (optional) │
|
||
│ Phase 4 │ TODO Tracking Setup │
|
||
│ Phase 5 │ Execution Loop │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Level Quick Reference
|
||
|
||
| Level | Name | Workflows | Artifacts | Execution |
|
||
|-------|------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
|
||
| **1** | Rapid | `lite-lite-lite` | None | Direct execute |
|
||
| **2** | Lightweight | `lite-plan`, `lite-fix`, `multi-cli-plan` | Memory/Lightweight files | → `lite-execute` |
|
||
| **3** | Standard | `plan`, `tdd-plan`, `test-fix-gen` | Session persistence | → `execute` / `test-cycle-execute` |
|
||
| **4** | Brainstorm | `brainstorm:auto-parallel` → `plan` | Multi-role analysis + Session | → `execute` |
|
||
| **-** | Issue | `discover` → `plan` → `queue` → `execute` | Issue records | Worktree isolation (optional) |
|
||
|
||
## Workflow Selection Decision Tree
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Start
|
||
│
|
||
├─ Is it post-development maintenance?
|
||
│ ├─ Yes → Issue Workflow
|
||
│ └─ No ↓
|
||
│
|
||
├─ Are requirements clear?
|
||
│ ├─ Uncertain → Level 4 (brainstorm:auto-parallel)
|
||
│ └─ Clear ↓
|
||
│
|
||
├─ Need persistent Session?
|
||
│ ├─ Yes → Level 3 (plan / tdd-plan / test-fix-gen)
|
||
│ └─ No ↓
|
||
│
|
||
├─ Need multi-perspective / solution comparison?
|
||
│ ├─ Yes → Level 2 (multi-cli-plan)
|
||
│ └─ No ↓
|
||
│
|
||
├─ Is it a bug fix?
|
||
│ ├─ Yes → Level 2 (lite-fix)
|
||
│ └─ No ↓
|
||
│
|
||
├─ Need planning?
|
||
│ ├─ Yes → Level 2 (lite-plan)
|
||
│ └─ No → Level 1 (lite-lite-lite)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Intent Classification
|
||
|
||
### Priority Order (with Level Mapping)
|
||
|
||
| Priority | Intent | Patterns | Level | Flow |
|
||
|----------|--------|----------|-------|------|
|
||
| 1 | bugfix/hotfix | `urgent,production,critical` + bug | L2 | `bugfix.hotfix` |
|
||
| 1 | bugfix | `fix,bug,error,crash,fail` | L2 | `bugfix.standard` |
|
||
| 2 | issue batch | `issues,batch` + `fix,resolve` | Issue | `issue` |
|
||
| 3 | exploration | `不确定,explore,研究,what if` | L4 | `full` |
|
||
| 3 | multi-perspective | `多视角,权衡,比较方案,cross-verify` | L2 | `multi-cli-plan` |
|
||
| 4 | quick-task | `快速,简单,small,quick` + feature | L1 | `lite-lite-lite` |
|
||
| 5 | ui design | `ui,design,component,style` | L3/L4 | `ui` |
|
||
| 6 | tdd | `tdd,test-driven,先写测试` | L3 | `tdd` |
|
||
| 7 | test-fix | `测试失败,test fail,fix test` | L3 | `test-fix-gen` |
|
||
| 8 | review | `review,审查,code review` | L3 | `review-fix` |
|
||
| 9 | documentation | `文档,docs,readme` | L2 | `docs` |
|
||
| 99 | feature | complexity-based | L2/L3 | `rapid`/`coupled` |
|
||
|
||
### Quick Selection Guide
|
||
|
||
| Scenario | Recommended Workflow | Level |
|
||
|----------|---------------------|-------|
|
||
| Quick fixes, config adjustments | `lite-lite-lite` | 1 |
|
||
| Clear single-module features | `lite-plan → lite-execute` | 2 |
|
||
| Bug diagnosis and fix | `lite-fix` | 2 |
|
||
| Production emergencies | `lite-fix --hotfix` | 2 |
|
||
| Technology selection, solution comparison | `multi-cli-plan → lite-execute` | 2 |
|
||
| Multi-module changes, refactoring | `plan → verify → execute` | 3 |
|
||
| Test-driven development | `tdd-plan → execute → tdd-verify` | 3 |
|
||
| Test failure fixes | `test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute` | 3 |
|
||
| New features, architecture design | `brainstorm:auto-parallel → plan → execute` | 4 |
|
||
| Post-development issue fixes | Issue Workflow | - |
|
||
|
||
### Complexity Assessment
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
function assessComplexity(text) {
|
||
let score = 0
|
||
if (/refactor|重构|migrate|迁移|architect|架构|system|系统/.test(text)) score += 2
|
||
if (/multiple|多个|across|跨|all|所有|entire|整个/.test(text)) score += 2
|
||
if (/integrate|集成|api|database|数据库/.test(text)) score += 1
|
||
if (/security|安全|performance|性能|scale|扩展/.test(text)) score += 1
|
||
return score >= 4 ? 'high' : score >= 2 ? 'medium' : 'low'
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
| Complexity | Flow |
|
||
|------------|------|
|
||
| high | `coupled` (plan → verify → execute) |
|
||
| medium/low | `rapid` (lite-plan → lite-execute) |
|
||
|
||
### Dimension Extraction (WHAT/WHERE/WHY/HOW)
|
||
|
||
从用户输入提取四个维度,用于需求澄清和工作流选择:
|
||
|
||
| 维度 | 提取内容 | 示例模式 |
|
||
|------|----------|----------|
|
||
| **WHAT** | action + target | `创建/修复/重构/优化/分析` + 目标对象 |
|
||
| **WHERE** | scope + paths | `file/module/system` + 文件路径 |
|
||
| **WHY** | goal + motivation | `为了.../因为.../目的是...` |
|
||
| **HOW** | constraints + preferences | `必须.../不要.../应该...` |
|
||
|
||
**Clarity Score** (0-3):
|
||
- +0.5: 有明确 action
|
||
- +0.5: 有具体 target
|
||
- +0.5: 有文件路径
|
||
- +0.5: scope 不是 unknown
|
||
- +0.5: 有明确 goal
|
||
- +0.5: 有约束条件
|
||
- -0.5: 包含不确定词 (`不知道/maybe/怎么`)
|
||
|
||
### Requirement Clarification
|
||
|
||
当 `clarity_score < 2` 时触发需求澄清:
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
if (dimensions.clarity_score < 2) {
|
||
const questions = generateClarificationQuestions(dimensions)
|
||
// 生成问题:目标是什么? 范围是什么? 有什么约束?
|
||
AskUserQuestion({ questions })
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**澄清问题类型**:
|
||
- 目标不明确 → "你想要对什么进行操作?"
|
||
- 范围不明确 → "操作的范围是什么?"
|
||
- 目的不明确 → "这个操作的主要目标是什么?"
|
||
- 复杂操作 → "有什么特殊要求或限制?"
|
||
|
||
## TODO Tracking Protocol
|
||
|
||
### CRITICAL: Append-Only Rule
|
||
|
||
CCW 创建的 Todo **必须附加到现有列表**,不能覆盖用户的其他 Todo。
|
||
|
||
### Implementation
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// 1. 使用 CCW 前缀隔离工作流 todo
|
||
const prefix = `CCW:${flowName}`
|
||
|
||
// 2. 创建新 todo 时使用前缀格式
|
||
TodoWrite({
|
||
todos: [
|
||
...existingNonCCWTodos, // 保留用户的 todo
|
||
{ content: `${prefix}: [1/N] /command:step1`, status: "in_progress", activeForm: "..." },
|
||
{ content: `${prefix}: [2/N] /command:step2`, status: "pending", activeForm: "..." }
|
||
]
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// 3. 更新状态时只修改匹配前缀的 todo
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Todo Format
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
CCW:{flow}: [{N}/{Total}] /command:name
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Visual Example
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
✓ CCW:rapid: [1/2] /workflow:lite-plan
|
||
→ CCW:rapid: [2/2] /workflow:lite-execute
|
||
用户自己的 todo(保留不动)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Status Management
|
||
|
||
- 开始工作流:创建所有步骤 todo,第一步 `in_progress`
|
||
- 完成步骤:当前步骤 `completed`,下一步 `in_progress`
|
||
- 工作流结束:所有 CCW todo 标记 `completed`
|
||
|
||
## Execution Flow
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// 1. Check explicit command
|
||
if (input.startsWith('/workflow:') || input.startsWith('/issue:')) {
|
||
SlashCommand(input)
|
||
return
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// 2. Classify intent
|
||
const intent = classifyIntent(input) // See command.json intent_rules
|
||
|
||
// 3. Select flow
|
||
const flow = selectFlow(intent) // See command.json flows
|
||
|
||
// 4. Create todos with CCW prefix
|
||
createWorkflowTodos(flow)
|
||
|
||
// 5. Dispatch first command
|
||
SlashCommand(flow.steps[0].command, args: input)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## CLI Tool Integration
|
||
|
||
CCW 在特定条件下自动注入 CLI 调用:
|
||
|
||
| Condition | CLI Inject |
|
||
|-----------|------------|
|
||
| 大量代码上下文 (≥50k chars) | `gemini --mode analysis` |
|
||
| 高复杂度任务 | `gemini --mode analysis` |
|
||
| Bug 诊断 | `gemini --mode analysis` |
|
||
| 多任务执行 (≥3 tasks) | `codex --mode write` |
|
||
|
||
### CLI Enhancement Phases
|
||
|
||
**Phase 1.5: CLI-Assisted Classification**
|
||
|
||
当规则匹配不明确时,使用 CLI 辅助分类:
|
||
|
||
| 触发条件 | 说明 |
|
||
|----------|------|
|
||
| matchCount < 2 | 多个意图模式匹配 |
|
||
| complexity = high | 高复杂度任务 |
|
||
| input > 100 chars | 长输入需要语义理解 |
|
||
|
||
**Phase 2.5: CLI-Assisted Action Planning**
|
||
|
||
高复杂度任务的工作流优化:
|
||
|
||
| 触发条件 | 说明 |
|
||
|----------|------|
|
||
| complexity = high | 高复杂度任务 |
|
||
| steps >= 3 | 多步骤工作流 |
|
||
| input > 200 chars | 复杂需求描述 |
|
||
|
||
CLI 可返回建议:`use_default` | `modify` (调整步骤) | `upgrade` (升级工作流)
|
||
|
||
## Continuation Commands
|
||
|
||
工作流执行中的用户控制命令:
|
||
|
||
| 命令 | 作用 |
|
||
|------|------|
|
||
| `continue` | 继续执行下一步 |
|
||
| `skip` | 跳过当前步骤 |
|
||
| `abort` | 终止工作流 |
|
||
| `/workflow:*` | 切换到指定命令 |
|
||
| 自然语言 | 重新分析意图 |
|
||
|
||
## Workflow Flow Details
|
||
|
||
### Issue Workflow (Main Workflow 补充机制)
|
||
|
||
Issue Workflow 是 Main Workflow 的**补充机制**,专注于开发后的持续维护。
|
||
|
||
#### 设计理念
|
||
|
||
| 方面 | Main Workflow | Issue Workflow |
|
||
|------|---------------|----------------|
|
||
| **用途** | 主要开发周期 | 开发后维护 |
|
||
| **时机** | 功能开发阶段 | 主工作流完成后 |
|
||
| **范围** | 完整功能实现 | 针对性修复/增强 |
|
||
| **并行性** | 依赖分析 → Agent 并行 | Worktree 隔离 (可选) |
|
||
| **分支模型** | 当前分支工作 | 可使用隔离的 worktree |
|
||
|
||
#### 为什么 Main Workflow 不自动使用 Worktree?
|
||
|
||
**依赖分析已解决并行性问题**:
|
||
1. 规划阶段 (`/workflow:plan`) 执行依赖分析
|
||
2. 自动识别任务依赖和关键路径
|
||
3. 划分为**并行组**(独立任务)和**串行链**(依赖任务)
|
||
4. Agent 并行执行独立任务,无需文件系统隔离
|
||
|
||
#### 两阶段生命周期
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Phase 1: Accumulation (积累阶段) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Triggers: 任务完成后的 review、代码审查发现、测试失败 │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ discover │ │ discover- │ │ new │ │
|
||
│ │ Auto-find │ │ by-prompt │ │ Manual │ │
|
||
│ └────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ 持续积累 issues 到待处理队列 │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
│
|
||
│ 积累足够后
|
||
▼
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ Phase 2: Batch Resolution (批量解决阶段) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ plan │ ──→ │ queue │ ──→ │ execute │ │
|
||
│ │ --all- │ │ Optimize │ │ Parallel │ │
|
||
│ │ pending │ │ order │ │ execution │ │
|
||
│ └────────────┘ └────────────┘ └────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ 支持 worktree 隔离,保持主分支稳定 │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### 与 Main Workflow 的协作
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
开发迭代循环
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ Feature │ ──→ Main Workflow ──→ Done ──→│ Review │ │
|
||
│ │ Request │ (Level 1-4) └────┬────┘ │
|
||
│ └─────────┘ │ │
|
||
│ ▲ │ 发现 Issues │
|
||
│ │ ▼ │
|
||
│ │ ┌─────────┐ │
|
||
│ 继续 │ │ Issue │ │
|
||
│ 新功能│ │ Workflow│ │
|
||
│ │ └────┬────┘ │
|
||
│ │ ┌──────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │ │ 修复完成 │
|
||
│ │ ▼ │
|
||
│ ┌────┴────┐◀────── │
|
||
│ │ Main │ Merge │
|
||
│ │ Branch │ back │
|
||
│ └─────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
#### 命令列表
|
||
|
||
**积累阶段:**
|
||
```bash
|
||
/issue:discover # 多视角自动发现
|
||
/issue:discover-by-prompt # 基于提示发现
|
||
/issue:new # 手动创建
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**批量解决阶段:**
|
||
```bash
|
||
/issue:plan --all-pending # 批量规划所有待处理
|
||
/issue:queue # 生成优化执行队列
|
||
/issue:execute # 并行执行
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### lite-lite-lite vs multi-cli-plan
|
||
|
||
| 维度 | lite-lite-lite | multi-cli-plan |
|
||
|------|---------------|----------------|
|
||
| **产物** | 无文件 | IMPL_PLAN.md + plan.json + synthesis.json |
|
||
| **状态** | 无状态 | 持久化 session |
|
||
| **CLI选择** | 自动分析任务类型选择 | 配置驱动 |
|
||
| **迭代** | 通过 AskUser | 多轮收敛 |
|
||
| **执行** | 直接执行 | 通过 lite-execute |
|
||
| **适用** | 快速修复、简单功能 | 复杂多步骤实现 |
|
||
|
||
**选择指南**:
|
||
- 任务清晰、改动范围小 → `lite-lite-lite`
|
||
- 需要多视角分析、复杂架构 → `multi-cli-plan`
|
||
|
||
### multi-cli-plan vs lite-plan
|
||
|
||
| 维度 | multi-cli-plan | lite-plan |
|
||
|------|---------------|-----------|
|
||
| **上下文** | ACE 语义搜索 | 手动文件模式 |
|
||
| **分析** | 多 CLI 交叉验证 | 单次规划 |
|
||
| **迭代** | 多轮直到收敛 | 单轮 |
|
||
| **置信度** | 高 (共识驱动) | 中 (单一视角) |
|
||
| **适用** | 需要多视角的复杂任务 | 直接明确的实现 |
|
||
|
||
**选择指南**:
|
||
- 需求明确、路径清晰 → `lite-plan`
|
||
- 需要权衡、多方案比较 → `multi-cli-plan`
|
||
|
||
## Artifact Flow Protocol
|
||
|
||
工作流产出的自动流转机制,支持不同格式产出间的意图提取和完成度判断。
|
||
|
||
### 产出格式
|
||
|
||
| 命令 | 产出位置 | 格式 | 关键字段 |
|
||
|------|----------|------|----------|
|
||
| `/workflow:lite-plan` | memory://plan | structured_plan | tasks, files, dependencies |
|
||
| `/workflow:plan` | .workflow/{session}/IMPL_PLAN.md | markdown_plan | phases, tasks, risks |
|
||
| `/workflow:execute` | execution_log.json | execution_report | completed_tasks, errors |
|
||
| `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` | test_results.json | test_report | pass_rate, failures, coverage |
|
||
| `/workflow:review-session-cycle` | review_report.md | review_report | findings, severity_counts |
|
||
|
||
### 意图提取 (Intent Extraction)
|
||
|
||
流转到下一步时,自动提取关键信息:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
plan → execute:
|
||
提取: tasks (未完成), priority_order, files_to_modify, context_summary
|
||
|
||
execute → test:
|
||
提取: modified_files, test_scope (推断), pending_verification
|
||
|
||
test → fix:
|
||
条件: pass_rate < 0.95
|
||
提取: failures, error_messages, affected_files, suggested_fixes
|
||
|
||
review → fix:
|
||
条件: critical > 0 OR high > 3
|
||
提取: findings (critical/high), fix_priority, affected_files
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 完成度判断
|
||
|
||
**Test 完成度路由**:
|
||
```
|
||
pass_rate >= 0.95 AND coverage >= 0.80 → complete
|
||
pass_rate >= 0.95 AND coverage < 0.80 → add_more_tests
|
||
pass_rate >= 0.80 → fix_failures_then_continue
|
||
pass_rate < 0.80 → major_fix_required
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Review 完成度路由**:
|
||
```
|
||
critical == 0 AND high <= 3 → complete_or_optional_fix
|
||
critical > 0 → mandatory_fix
|
||
high > 3 → recommended_fix
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 流转决策模式
|
||
|
||
**plan_execute_test**:
|
||
```
|
||
plan → execute → test
|
||
↓ (if test fail)
|
||
extract_failures → fix → test (max 3 iterations)
|
||
↓ (if still fail)
|
||
manual_intervention
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**iterative_improvement**:
|
||
```
|
||
execute → test → fix → test → ...
|
||
loop until: pass_rate >= 0.95 OR iterations >= 3
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 使用示例
|
||
|
||
```javascript
|
||
// 执行完成后,根据产出决定下一步
|
||
const result = await execute(plan)
|
||
|
||
// 提取意图流转到测试
|
||
const testContext = extractIntent('execute_to_test', result)
|
||
// testContext = { modified_files, test_scope, pending_verification }
|
||
|
||
// 测试完成后,根据完成度决定路由
|
||
const testResult = await test(testContext)
|
||
const nextStep = evaluateCompletion('test', testResult)
|
||
// nextStep = 'fix_failures_then_continue' if pass_rate = 0.85
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Reference
|
||
|
||
- [command.json](command.json) - 命令元数据、Flow 定义、意图规则、Artifact Flow
|