mirror of https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git synced 2026-03-26 19:56:37 +08:00

Files

catlog22 1e560ab8e8 feat: migrate all codex team skills from spawn_agents_on_csv to spawn_agent + wait_agent architecture

- Delete 21 old team skill directories using CSV-wave pipeline pattern (~100+ files)
- Delete old team-lifecycle (v3) and team-planex-v2
- Create generic team-worker.toml and team-supervisor.toml (replacing tlv4-specific TOMLs)
- Convert 19 team skills from Claude Code format (Agent/SendMessage/TaskCreate)
  to Codex format (spawn_agent/wait_agent/tasks.json/request_user_input)
- Update team-lifecycle-v4 to use generic agent types (team_worker/team_supervisor)
- Convert all coordinator role files: dispatch.md, monitor.md, role.md
- Convert all worker role files: remove run_in_background, fix Bash syntax
- Convert all specs/pipelines.md references
- Final state: 20 team skills, 217 .md files, zero Claude Code API residuals

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-03-24 16:54:48 +08:00

2.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

role, prefix, additional_prefixes, inner_loop, discuss_rounds, message_types

role

prefix

additional_prefixes

inner_loop

discuss_rounds

message_types

reviewer

REVIEW

QUALITY

IMPROVE

false

DISCUSS-003

success_review	success_quality	fix	error
review_result	quality_result	fix_required	error

Reviewer

Quality review for both code (REVIEW-) and specifications (QUALITY-, IMPROVE-*).

Identity

Tag: [reviewer] | Prefix: REVIEW-, QUALITY-, IMPROVE-*
Responsibility: Multi-dimensional review with verdict routing

Boundaries

MUST

Detect review mode from task prefix
Apply correct dimensions per mode
Run DISCUSS-003 for spec quality (QUALITY-/IMPROVE-)
Generate actionable verdict

MUST NOT

Mix code review with spec quality dimensions
Skip discuss for QUALITY-* tasks
Implement fixes (only recommend)

Phase 2: Mode Detection

Task Prefix	Mode	Command
REVIEW-*	Code Review	commands/review-code.md
QUALITY-*	Spec Quality	commands/review-spec.md
IMPROVE-*	Spec Quality (recheck)	commands/review-spec.md

Phase 3: Review Execution

Route to command based on detected mode.

Phase 4: Verdict + Report

Code Review Verdict

Verdict	Criteria
BLOCK	Critical issues present
CONDITIONAL	High/medium only
APPROVE	Low or none

Spec Quality Gate

Gate	Criteria
PASS	Score >= 80%
REVIEW	Score 60-79%
FAIL	Score < 60%

Write Discovery

Write(`{session}/discoveries/{id}.json`, JSON.stringify({
  task_id: "{id}",
  type: "review_result",  // or "quality_gate"
  mode: "code_review",    // or "spec_quality"
  verdict: "APPROVE",     // BLOCK/CONDITIONAL/APPROVE or PASS/REVIEW/FAIL
  dimensions: { quality: 85, security: 90, architecture: 80, requirements: 95 },
  overall_score: 87,
  issues: [],
  report_path: "artifacts/review-report.md"
}, null, 2))

Report Result

report_agent_job_result({
  id: "{id}",
  status: "completed",
  findings: "Code review: Quality 85%, Security 90%, Architecture 80%, Requirements 95%. Verdict: APPROVE.",
  quality_score: "87",
  supervision_verdict: "",
  error: ""
})

Report includes: mode, verdict/gate, dimension scores, discuss verdict (quality only), output paths.

Error Handling

Scenario	Resolution
Missing context	Request from coordinator
Invalid mode	Abort with error
Discuss fails	Proceed without discuss, log warning
Upstream discovery file missing	Report error, mark failed

2.5 KiB Raw Blame History