Files
Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/skills/software-manual/specs/quality-standards.md
catlog22 7aa1cda367 feat: add issue discovery view for managing discovery sessions and findings
- Implemented main render function for the issue discovery view.
- Added data loading functions to fetch discoveries, details, findings, and progress.
- Created rendering functions for discovery list and detail sections.
- Introduced filtering and searching capabilities for findings.
- Implemented actions for exporting and dismissing findings.
- Added polling mechanism to track discovery progress.
- Included utility functions for HTML escaping and cleanup.
2025-12-28 17:21:07 +08:00

254 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Quality Standards
Quality gates and standards for software manual generation.
## Quality Dimensions
### 1. Completeness (25%)
All required sections present and adequately covered.
| Requirement | Weight | Criteria |
|-------------|--------|----------|
| Overview section | 5 | Product intro, features, quick start |
| UI Guide | 5 | All major screens documented |
| API Reference | 5 | All public APIs documented |
| Configuration | 4 | All config options explained |
| Troubleshooting | 3 | Common issues addressed |
| Examples | 3 | Multi-level examples provided |
**Scoring**:
- 100%: All sections present with adequate depth
- 80%: All sections present, some lacking depth
- 60%: Missing 1-2 sections
- 40%: Missing 3+ sections
- 0%: Critical sections missing (overview, UI guide)
### 2. Consistency (25%)
Terminology, style, and structure uniform across sections.
| Aspect | Check |
|--------|-------|
| Terminology | Same term for same concept throughout |
| Formatting | Consistent heading levels, code block styles |
| Tone | Consistent formality level |
| Cross-references | All internal links valid |
| Screenshot naming | Follow `ss-{feature}-{action}` pattern |
**Scoring**:
- 100%: Zero inconsistencies
- 80%: 1-3 minor inconsistencies
- 60%: 4-6 inconsistencies
- 40%: 7-10 inconsistencies
- 0%: Pervasive inconsistencies
### 3. Depth (25%)
Content provides sufficient detail for target audience.
| Level | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| Shallow | Basic descriptions only |
| Standard | Descriptions + usage examples |
| Deep | Descriptions + examples + edge cases + best practices |
**Per-Section Depth Check**:
- [ ] Explains "what" (definition)
- [ ] Explains "why" (rationale)
- [ ] Explains "how" (procedure)
- [ ] Provides examples
- [ ] Covers edge cases
- [ ] Includes tips/best practices
**Scoring**:
- 100%: Deep coverage on all critical sections
- 80%: Standard coverage on all sections
- 60%: Shallow coverage on some sections
- 40%: Missing depth in critical areas
- 0%: Superficial throughout
### 4. Readability (25%)
Clear, user-friendly writing that's easy to follow.
| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Sentence length | Average < 20 words |
| Paragraph length | Average < 5 sentences |
| Heading hierarchy | Proper H1 > H2 > H3 nesting |
| Code blocks | Language specified |
| Lists | Used for 3+ items |
| Screenshots | Placed near relevant text |
**Structural Elements**:
- [ ] Clear section headers
- [ ] Numbered steps for procedures
- [ ] Bullet lists for options/features
- [ ] Tables for comparisons
- [ ] Code blocks with syntax highlighting
- [ ] Screenshots with captions
**Scoring**:
- 100%: All readability criteria met
- 80%: Minor structural issues
- 60%: Some sections hard to follow
- 40%: Significant readability problems
- 0%: Unclear, poorly structured
## Overall Quality Score
```
Overall = (Completeness × 0.25) + (Consistency × 0.25) +
(Depth × 0.25) + (Readability × 0.25)
```
**Quality Gates**:
| Gate | Threshold | Action |
|------|-----------|--------|
| Pass | ≥ 80% | Proceed to HTML generation |
| Review | 60-79% | Address warnings, proceed with caution |
| Fail | < 60% | Must address errors before continuing |
## Issue Classification
### Errors (Must Fix)
- Missing required sections
- Invalid cross-references
- Broken screenshot markers
- Code blocks without language
- Incomplete procedures (missing steps)
### Warnings (Should Fix)
- Terminology inconsistencies
- Sections lacking depth
- Missing examples
- Long paragraphs (> 7 sentences)
- Screenshots missing captions
### Info (Nice to Have)
- Optimization suggestions
- Additional example opportunities
- Alternative explanations
- Enhancement ideas
## Quality Checklist
### Pre-Generation
- [ ] All agents completed successfully
- [ ] No errors in consolidation report
- [ ] Overall score ≥ 60%
### Post-Generation
- [ ] HTML renders correctly
- [ ] Search returns relevant results
- [ ] All screenshots display
- [ ] Theme toggle works
- [ ] Print preview looks good
### Final Review
- [ ] User previewed and approved
- [ ] File size reasonable (< 10MB)
- [ ] No console errors in browser
- [ ] Accessible (keyboard navigation works)
## Automated Checks
```javascript
function runQualityChecks(workDir) {
const results = {
completeness: checkCompleteness(workDir),
consistency: checkConsistency(workDir),
depth: checkDepth(workDir),
readability: checkReadability(workDir)
};
results.overall = (
results.completeness * 0.25 +
results.consistency * 0.25 +
results.depth * 0.25 +
results.readability * 0.25
);
return results;
}
function checkCompleteness(workDir) {
const requiredSections = [
'section-overview.md',
'section-ui-guide.md',
'section-api-reference.md',
'section-configuration.md',
'section-troubleshooting.md',
'section-examples.md'
];
const existing = Glob(`${workDir}/sections/section-*.md`);
const found = requiredSections.filter(s =>
existing.some(e => e.endsWith(s))
);
return (found.length / requiredSections.length) * 100;
}
function checkConsistency(workDir) {
// Check terminology, cross-references, naming conventions
const issues = [];
// ... implementation ...
return Math.max(0, 100 - issues.length * 10);
}
function checkDepth(workDir) {
// Check content length, examples, edge cases
const sections = Glob(`${workDir}/sections/section-*.md`);
let totalScore = 0;
for (const section of sections) {
const content = Read(section);
let sectionScore = 0;
if (content.length > 500) sectionScore += 20;
if (content.includes('```')) sectionScore += 20;
if (content.includes('Example')) sectionScore += 20;
if (content.match(/\d+\./g)?.length > 3) sectionScore += 20;
if (content.includes('Note:') || content.includes('Tip:')) sectionScore += 20;
totalScore += sectionScore;
}
return totalScore / sections.length;
}
function checkReadability(workDir) {
// Check structure, formatting, organization
const sections = Glob(`${workDir}/sections/section-*.md`);
let issues = 0;
for (const section of sections) {
const content = Read(section);
// Check heading hierarchy
if (!content.startsWith('# ')) issues++;
// Check code block languages
const codeBlocks = content.match(/```\w*/g);
if (codeBlocks?.some(b => b === '```')) issues++;
// Check paragraph length
const paragraphs = content.split('\n\n');
if (paragraphs.some(p => p.split('. ').length > 7)) issues++;
}
return Math.max(0, 100 - issues * 10);
}
```