mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-06 16:31:12 +08:00
bf057a927b
- Introduced quality gates documentation outlining scoring dimensions and per-phase criteria. - Created a dynamic role library with definitions for core and specialist roles, including data engineer, devops engineer, ml engineer, orchestrator, performance optimizer, and security expert. - Added templates for architecture documents, epics and stories, product briefs, and requirements PRD to standardize outputs across phases.
99 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
99 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
role: planner
|
|
prefix: PLAN
|
|
inner_loop: true
|
|
discuss_rounds: []
|
|
input_artifact_types: [spec, architecture]
|
|
message_types:
|
|
success: plan_ready
|
|
revision: plan_revision
|
|
error: error
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Planner — Phase 2-4
|
|
|
|
## Phase 1.5: Load Spec Context (Full-Lifecycle)
|
|
|
|
If `<session-folder>/spec/` exists → load requirements/_index.md, architecture/_index.md, epics/_index.md, spec-config.json. Otherwise → impl-only mode.
|
|
|
|
**Check shared explorations**: Read `<session-folder>/explorations/cache-index.json` to see if analyst already cached useful explorations. Reuse rather than re-explore.
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2: Multi-Angle Exploration
|
|
|
|
**Objective**: Explore codebase to inform planning.
|
|
|
|
**Complexity routing**:
|
|
|
|
| Complexity | Criteria | Strategy |
|
|
|------------|----------|----------|
|
|
| Low | < 200 chars, no refactor/architecture keywords | ACE semantic search only |
|
|
| Medium | 200-500 chars or moderate scope | 2-3 angle explore subagent |
|
|
| High | > 500 chars, refactor/architecture, multi-module | 3-5 angle explore subagent |
|
|
|
|
For each angle, use CLI exploration (cache-aware — check cache-index.json before each call):
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Bash({
|
|
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Explore codebase from <angle> perspective to inform planning
|
|
TASK: • Search for <angle>-specific patterns • Identify relevant files • Document integration points
|
|
MODE: analysis
|
|
CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: Task keywords: <keywords>
|
|
EXPECTED: JSON with: relevant_files[], patterns[], integration_points[], recommendations[]
|
|
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on <angle> perspective" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-analyze-code-patterns`,
|
|
run_in_background: false
|
|
})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Phase 3: Plan Generation
|
|
|
|
**Objective**: Generate structured implementation plan.
|
|
|
|
| Complexity | Strategy |
|
|
|------------|----------|
|
|
| Low | Direct planning → single TASK-001 with plan.json |
|
|
| Medium/High | cli-lite-planning-agent with exploration results |
|
|
|
|
**CLI call** (Medium/High):
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Bash({
|
|
command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate structured implementation plan from exploration results
|
|
TASK: • Create plan.json with overview • Generate TASK-*.json files (2-7 tasks) • Define dependencies • Set convergence criteria
|
|
MODE: write
|
|
CONTEXT: @<session-folder>/explorations/*.json | Memory: Complexity: <complexity>
|
|
EXPECTED: Files: plan.json + .task/TASK-*.json. Schema: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json
|
|
CONSTRAINTS: 2-7 tasks, include id/title/files[].change/convergence.criteria/depends_on" --tool gemini --mode write --rule planning-breakdown-task-steps`,
|
|
run_in_background: false
|
|
})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Spec context** (full-lifecycle): Reference REQ-* IDs, follow ADR decisions, reuse Epic/Story decomposition.
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4: Submit for Approval
|
|
|
|
1. Read plan.json and TASK-*.json
|
|
2. Report to coordinator: complexity, task count, task list, approach, plan location
|
|
3. Wait for response: approved → complete; revision → update and resubmit
|
|
|
|
**Session files**:
|
|
```
|
|
<session-folder>/explorations/ (shared cache)
|
|
+-- cache-index.json
|
|
+-- explore-<angle>.json
|
|
|
|
<session-folder>/plan/
|
|
+-- explorations-manifest.json
|
|
+-- plan.json
|
|
+-- .task/TASK-*.json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Error Handling
|
|
|
|
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
|
|----------|------------|
|
|
| CLI exploration failure | Plan from description only |
|
|
| CLI planning failure | Fallback to direct planning |
|
|
| Plan rejected 3+ times | Notify coordinator, suggest alternative |
|
|
| Schema not found | Use basic structure |
|
|
| Cache index corrupt | Clear cache, re-explore all angles |
|