mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-14 02:42:04 +08:00
89f6ac6804
- Phase 3: Added Mermaid diagram generation for system architecture, function modules, algorithms, class diagrams, sequence diagrams, and error flows. - Phase 4: Assembled analysis and diagrams into a structured CPCC-compliant document with section templates and figure numbering. - Phase 5: Developed compliance review process with iterative refinement based on analysis findings and user feedback. - Added CPCC compliance requirements and quality standards for project analysis reports. - Established a comprehensive project analysis skill with detailed execution flow and report types. - Enhanced error handling and recovery mechanisms throughout the analysis phases.
80 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
80 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
# Phase 1: Requirements Discovery
|
|
|
|
Collect user requirements before analysis begins.
|
|
|
|
## Execution
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Report Type Selection
|
|
|
|
```javascript
|
|
AskUserQuestion({
|
|
questions: [{
|
|
question: "What type of project analysis report would you like?",
|
|
header: "Report Type",
|
|
multiSelect: false,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{label: "Architecture (Recommended)", description: "System structure, module relationships, layer analysis, dependency graph"},
|
|
{label: "Design", description: "Design patterns, class relationships, component interactions, abstraction analysis"},
|
|
{label: "Methods", description: "Key algorithms, critical code paths, core function explanations with examples"},
|
|
{label: "Comprehensive", description: "All above combined into a complete project analysis"}
|
|
]
|
|
}]
|
|
})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Depth Level Selection
|
|
|
|
```javascript
|
|
AskUserQuestion({
|
|
questions: [{
|
|
question: "What depth level do you need?",
|
|
header: "Depth",
|
|
multiSelect: false,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{label: "Overview", description: "High-level understanding, suitable for onboarding"},
|
|
{label: "Detailed", description: "In-depth analysis with code examples"},
|
|
{label: "Deep-Dive", description: "Exhaustive analysis with implementation details"}
|
|
]
|
|
}]
|
|
})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Scope Definition
|
|
|
|
```javascript
|
|
AskUserQuestion({
|
|
questions: [{
|
|
question: "What scope should the analysis cover?",
|
|
header: "Scope",
|
|
multiSelect: false,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{label: "Full Project", description: "Analyze entire codebase"},
|
|
{label: "Specific Module", description: "Focus on a specific module or directory"},
|
|
{label: "Custom Path", description: "Specify custom path pattern"}
|
|
]
|
|
}]
|
|
})
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Focus Areas Mapping
|
|
|
|
| Report Type | Focus Areas |
|
|
|-------------|-------------|
|
|
| Architecture | Layer Structure, Module Dependencies, Entry Points, Data Flow |
|
|
| Design | Design Patterns, Class Relationships, Interface Contracts, State Management |
|
|
| Methods | Core Algorithms, Critical Paths, Public APIs, Complex Logic |
|
|
| Comprehensive | All above combined |
|
|
|
|
## Output
|
|
|
|
Save configuration to `analysis-config.json`:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "architecture|design|methods|comprehensive",
|
|
"depth": "overview|detailed|deep-dive",
|
|
"scope": "**/*|src/**/*|custom",
|
|
"focus_areas": ["..."]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|