Files
Claude-Code-Workflow/.codex/skills/collaborative-plan-with-file/SKILL.md
catlog22 afd9729873 feat: add plan-converter skill for converting planning artifacts to unified JSONL format
- Implemented a new skill to convert various planning outputs (roadmap.jsonl, plan-note.md, conclusions.json, synthesis.json) into a standardized JSONL task format.
- Included detailed documentation on supported input formats, unified JSONL schema, execution process, and error handling.
- Added functions for parsing, transforming, and validating input data to ensure quality and consistency in the output.
2026-02-09 13:32:46 +08:00

774 lines
30 KiB
Markdown

---
name: collaborative-plan-with-file
description: Serial collaborative planning with Plan Note - Multi-domain serial task generation, unified plan-note.md, conflict detection. No agent delegation.
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] <task description> [--max-domains=5]"
---
# Collaborative-Plan-With-File Workflow
## Quick Start
Serial collaborative planning workflow using **Plan Note** architecture. Analyzes requirements, identifies sub-domains, generates detailed plans per domain serially, and detects conflicts across domains.
```bash
# Basic usage
/codex:collaborative-plan-with-file "Implement real-time notification system"
# With options
/codex:collaborative-plan-with-file "Refactor authentication module" --max-domains=4
/codex:collaborative-plan-with-file "Add payment gateway support" -y
```
**Core workflow**: Understand → Template → Serial Domain Planning → Conflict Detection → Completion
**Key features**:
- **plan-note.md**: Shared collaborative document with pre-allocated sections per domain
- **Serial domain planning**: Each sub-domain planned sequentially with full codebase context
- **Conflict detection**: Automatic file, dependency, and strategy conflict scanning
- **No merge needed**: Pre-allocated sections eliminate merge conflicts
## Auto Mode
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-approve splits, skip confirmations.
## Overview
This workflow enables structured planning through sequential phases:
1. **Understanding & Template** — Analyze requirements, identify sub-domains, create plan-note.md template
2. **Serial Domain Planning** — Plan each sub-domain sequentially using direct search and analysis
3. **Conflict Detection** — Scan plan-note.md for conflicts across all domains
4. **Completion** — Generate human-readable plan.md summary
The key innovation is the **Plan Note** architecture — a shared collaborative document with pre-allocated sections per sub-domain, eliminating merge conflicts even in serial execution.
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PLAN NOTE COLLABORATIVE PLANNING │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Phase 1: Understanding & Template Creation │
│ ├─ Analyze requirements (inline search & analysis) │
│ ├─ Identify 2-5 sub-domains (focus areas) │
│ ├─ Create plan-note.md with pre-allocated sections │
│ └─ Assign TASK ID ranges (no conflicts) │
│ │
│ Phase 2: Serial Domain Planning │
│ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Domain 1 │→ Explore codebase → Generate tasks.jsonl │
│ │ Section 1 │→ Fill task pool + evidence in plan-note.md │
│ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ ┌──────▼───────┐ │
│ │ Domain 2 │→ Explore codebase → Generate tasks.jsonl │
│ │ Section 2 │→ Fill task pool + evidence in plan-note.md │
│ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ ┌──────▼───────┐ │
│ │ Domain N │→ ... │
│ └──────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Phase 3: Conflict Detection (Single Source) │
│ ├─ Parse plan-note.md (all sections) │
│ ├─ Detect file/dependency/strategy conflicts │
│ └─ Update plan-note.md conflict section │
│ │
│ Phase 4: Completion (No Merge) │
│ ├─ Merge domain tasks.jsonl → session tasks.jsonl │
│ ├─ Generate plan.md (human-readable) │
│ └─ Ready for execution │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Output Structure
```
{projectRoot}/.workflow/.planning/CPLAN-{slug}-{date}/
├── plan-note.md # ⭐ Core: Requirements + Tasks + Conflicts
├── requirement-analysis.json # Phase 1: Sub-domain assignments
├── domains/ # Phase 2: Per-domain plans
│ ├── {domain-1}/
│ │ └── tasks.jsonl # Unified JSONL (one task per line)
│ ├── {domain-2}/
│ │ └── tasks.jsonl
│ └── ...
├── tasks.jsonl # ⭐ Merged unified JSONL (all domains)
├── conflicts.json # Phase 3: Conflict report
└── plan.md # Phase 4: Human-readable summary
```
## Output Artifacts
### Phase 1: Understanding & Template
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `plan-note.md` | Collaborative template with pre-allocated task pool and evidence sections per domain |
| `requirement-analysis.json` | Sub-domain assignments, TASK ID ranges, complexity assessment |
### Phase 2: Serial Domain Planning
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `domains/{domain}/tasks.jsonl` | Unified JSONL per domain (one task per line with convergence) |
| Updated `plan-note.md` | Task pool and evidence sections filled for each domain |
### Phase 3: Conflict Detection
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `conflicts.json` | Detected conflicts with types, severity, and resolutions |
| Updated `plan-note.md` | Conflict markers section populated |
### Phase 4: Completion
| Artifact | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `tasks.jsonl` | Merged unified JSONL from all domains (consumable by unified-execute) |
| `plan.md` | Human-readable summary with requirements, tasks, and conflicts |
---
## Implementation Details
### Session Initialization
##### Step 0: Initialize Session
```javascript
const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
// Detect project root
const projectRoot = Bash(`git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd`).trim()
// Parse arguments
const autoMode = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
const maxDomainsMatch = $ARGUMENTS.match(/--max-domains=(\d+)/)
const maxDomains = maxDomainsMatch ? parseInt(maxDomainsMatch[1]) : 5
// Clean task description
const taskDescription = $ARGUMENTS
.replace(/--yes|-y|--max-domains=\d+/g, '')
.trim()
const slug = taskDescription.toLowerCase()
.replace(/[^a-z0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+/g, '-')
.substring(0, 30)
const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
const sessionId = `CPLAN-${slug}-${dateStr}`
const sessionFolder = `${projectRoot}/.workflow/.planning/${sessionId}`
// Auto-detect continue: session folder + plan-note.md exists → continue mode
// If continue → load existing state and resume from incomplete phase
Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/domains`)
```
**Session Variables**:
- `sessionId`: Unique session identifier
- `sessionFolder`: Base directory for all artifacts
- `maxDomains`: Maximum number of sub-domains (default: 5)
- `autoMode`: Boolean for auto-confirmation
**Auto-Detection**: If session folder exists with plan-note.md, automatically enters continue mode.
---
## Phase 1: Understanding & Template Creation
**Objective**: Analyze task requirements, identify parallelizable sub-domains, and create the plan-note.md template with pre-allocated sections.
### Step 1.1: Analyze Task Description
Use built-in tools directly to understand the task scope and identify sub-domains.
**Analysis Activities**:
1. **Search for references** — Find related documentation, README files, and architecture guides
- Use: `mcp__ace-tool__search_context`, Grep, Glob, Read
- Read: `.workflow/project-tech.json`, `.workflow/project-guidelines.json` (if exists)
2. **Extract task keywords** — Identify key terms and concepts from the task description
3. **Identify ambiguities** — List any unclear points or multiple possible interpretations
4. **Clarify with user** — If ambiguities found, use AskUserQuestion for clarification
5. **Identify sub-domains** — Split into 2-{maxDomains} parallelizable focus areas based on task complexity
6. **Assess complexity** — Evaluate overall task complexity (Low/Medium/High)
**Sub-Domain Identification Patterns**:
| Pattern | Keywords |
|---------|----------|
| Backend API | 服务, 后端, API, 接口 |
| Frontend | 界面, 前端, UI, 视图 |
| Database | 数据, 存储, 数据库, 持久化 |
| Testing | 测试, 验证, QA |
| Infrastructure | 部署, 基础, 运维, 配置 |
**Guideline**: Prioritize identifying latest documentation (README, design docs, architecture guides). When ambiguities exist, ask user for clarification instead of assuming interpretations.
### Step 1.2: Create plan-note.md Template
Generate a structured template with pre-allocated sections for each sub-domain.
**plan-note.md Structure**:
```yaml
---
session_id: CPLAN-{slug}-{date}
original_requirement: "{task description}"
created_at: "{ISO timestamp}"
complexity: Low | Medium | High
sub_domains: ["{domain-1}", "{domain-2}", ...]
domain_task_id_ranges:
"{domain-1}": [1, 100]
"{domain-2}": [101, 200]
status: planning
---
```
**Sections**:
- `## 需求理解` — Core objectives, key points, constraints, split strategy
- `## 任务池 - {Domain N}` — Pre-allocated task section per domain (TASK-{range})
- `## 依赖关系` — Auto-generated after all domains complete
- `## 冲突标记` — Populated in Phase 3
- `## 上下文证据 - {Domain N}` — Evidence section per domain
**TASK ID Range Allocation**: Each domain receives a non-overlapping range of 100 IDs (e.g., Domain 1: TASK-001~100, Domain 2: TASK-101~200).
### Step 1.3: Generate requirement-analysis.json
```javascript
Write(`${sessionFolder}/requirement-analysis.json`, JSON.stringify({
session_id: sessionId,
original_requirement: taskDescription,
complexity: complexity, // Low | Medium | High
sub_domains: subDomains.map(sub => ({
focus_area: sub.focus_area,
description: sub.description,
task_id_range: sub.task_id_range,
estimated_effort: sub.estimated_effort,
dependencies: sub.dependencies // cross-domain dependencies
})),
total_domains: subDomains.length
}, null, 2))
```
**Success Criteria**:
- Latest documentation identified and referenced (if available)
- Ambiguities resolved via user clarification (if any found)
- 2-{maxDomains} clear sub-domains identified
- Each sub-domain can be planned independently
- Plan Note template includes all pre-allocated sections
- TASK ID ranges have no overlap (100 IDs per domain)
- Requirements understanding is comprehensive
---
## Phase 2: Serial Sub-Domain Planning
**Objective**: Plan each sub-domain sequentially, generating detailed plans and updating plan-note.md.
**Execution Model**: Serial inline execution — each domain explored and planned directly using search tools, one at a time.
### Step 2.1: User Confirmation (unless autoMode)
Display identified sub-domains and confirm before starting.
```javascript
if (!autoMode) {
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: `已识别 ${subDomains.length} 个子领域:\n${subDomains.map((s, i) =>
`${i+1}. ${s.focus_area}: ${s.description}`).join('\n')}\n\n确认开始规划?`,
header: "Confirm",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "开始规划", description: "逐域进行规划" },
{ label: "调整拆分", description: "修改子领域划分" },
{ label: "取消", description: "退出规划" }
]
}]
})
}
```
### Step 2.2: Serial Domain Planning
For each sub-domain, execute the full planning cycle inline:
```javascript
for (const sub of subDomains) {
// 1. Create domain directory
Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/domains/${sub.focus_area}`)
// 2. Explore codebase for domain-relevant context
// Use: mcp__ace-tool__search_context, Grep, Glob, Read
// Focus on:
// - Modules/components related to this domain
// - Existing patterns to follow
// - Integration points with other domains
// - Architecture constraints
// 3. Generate unified JSONL tasks (one task per line)
const domainTasks = [
// For each task within the assigned ID range:
{
id: `TASK-${String(sub.task_id_range[0]).padStart(3, '0')}`,
title: "...",
description: "...", // scope/goal of this task
type: "feature", // infrastructure|feature|enhancement|fix|refactor|testing
priority: "medium", // high|medium|low
effort: "medium", // small|medium|large
scope: "...", // Brief scope description
depends_on: [], // TASK-xxx references
convergence: {
criteria: ["... (testable)"], // Testable conditions
verification: "... (executable)", // Command or steps
definition_of_done: "... (business language)"
},
files: [ // Files to modify
{
path: "...",
action: "modify", // modify|create|delete
changes: ["..."], // Change descriptions
conflict_risk: "low" // low|medium|high
}
],
source: {
tool: "collaborative-plan-with-file",
session_id: sessionId,
original_id: `TASK-${String(sub.task_id_range[0]).padStart(3, '0')}`
}
}
// ... more tasks
]
// 4. Write domain tasks.jsonl (one task per line)
const jsonlContent = domainTasks.map(t => JSON.stringify(t)).join('\n')
Write(`${sessionFolder}/domains/${sub.focus_area}/tasks.jsonl`, jsonlContent)
// 5. Sync summary to plan-note.md
// Read current plan-note.md
// Locate pre-allocated sections:
// - Task Pool: "## 任务池 - ${toTitleCase(sub.focus_area)}"
// - Evidence: "## 上下文证据 - ${toTitleCase(sub.focus_area)}"
// Fill with task summaries and evidence
// Write back plan-note.md
}
```
**Task Summary Format** (for plan-note.md task pool sections):
```markdown
### TASK-{ID}: {Title} [{focus-area}]
- **状态**: pending
- **类型**: feature/fix/refactor/enhancement/testing/infrastructure
- **优先级**: high/medium/low
- **工作量**: small/medium/large
- **依赖**: TASK-xxx (if any)
- **范围**: Brief scope description
- **修改文件**: `file-path` (action): change summary
- **收敛标准**:
- criteria 1
- criteria 2
- **验证方式**: executable command or steps
- **完成定义**: business language definition
```
**Evidence Format** (for plan-note.md evidence sections):
```markdown
- **相关文件**: file list with relevance
- **现有模式**: patterns identified
- **约束**: constraints discovered
```
**Domain Planning Rules**:
- Each domain modifies ONLY its pre-allocated sections in plan-note.md
- Use assigned TASK ID range exclusively
- Include convergence criteria for each task (criteria + verification + definition_of_done)
- Include `files[]` with conflict_risk assessment per file
- Reference cross-domain dependencies explicitly
- Each task record must be self-contained (can be independently consumed by unified-execute)
### Step 2.3: Verify plan-note.md Consistency
After all domains are planned, verify the shared document.
**Verification Activities**:
1. Read final plan-note.md
2. Verify all task pool sections are populated
3. Verify all evidence sections are populated
4. Validate TASK ID uniqueness across all domains
5. Check for any section format inconsistencies
**Success Criteria**:
- `domains/{domain}/tasks.jsonl` created for each domain (unified JSONL format)
- Each task has convergence (criteria + verification + definition_of_done)
- `plan-note.md` updated with all task pools and evidence sections
- Task summaries follow consistent format
- No TASK ID overlaps across domains
---
## Phase 3: Conflict Detection
**Objective**: Analyze plan-note.md for conflicts across all domain contributions.
### Step 3.1: Parse plan-note.md
Extract all tasks from all "任务池" sections and domain tasks.jsonl files.
```javascript
// parsePlanNote(markdown)
// - Extract YAML frontmatter between `---` markers
// - Scan for heading patterns: /^(#{2,})\s+(.+)$/
// - Build sections array: { level, heading, start, content }
// - Return: { frontmatter, sections }
// Also load all domain tasks.jsonl for detailed data
// loadDomainTasks(sessionFolder, subDomains):
// const allTasks = []
// for (const sub of subDomains) {
// const jsonl = Read(`${sessionFolder}/domains/${sub.focus_area}/tasks.jsonl`)
// jsonl.split('\n').filter(l => l.trim()).forEach(line => {
// allTasks.push(JSON.parse(line))
// })
// }
// return allTasks
// extractTasksFromSection(content, sectionHeading)
// - Match: /### (TASK-\d+):\s+(.+?)\s+\[(.+?)\]/
// - For each: extract taskId, title, author
// - Parse details: status, type, priority, effort, depends_on, files, convergence
// - Return: array of task objects
// parseTaskDetails(content)
// - Extract via regex:
// - /\*\*状态\*\*:\s*(.+)/ → status
// - /\*\*类型\*\*:\s*(.+)/ → type
// - /\*\*优先级\*\*:\s*(.+)/ → priority
// - /\*\*工作量\*\*:\s*(.+)/ → effort
// - /\*\*依赖\*\*:\s*(.+)/ → depends_on (extract TASK-\d+ references)
// - Extract files: /- `([^`]+)` \((\w+)\):\s*(.+)/ → path, action, change
// - Return: { status, type, priority, effort, depends_on[], files[], convergence }
```
### Step 3.2: Detect Conflicts
Scan all tasks for three categories of conflicts.
**Conflict Types**:
| Type | Severity | Detection Logic | Resolution |
|------|----------|-----------------|------------|
| file_conflict | high | Same file:location modified by multiple domains | Coordinate modification order or merge changes |
| dependency_cycle | critical | Circular dependencies in task graph (DFS detection) | Remove or reorganize dependencies |
| strategy_conflict | medium | Multiple high-risk tasks in same file from different domains | Review approaches and align on single strategy |
**Detection Functions**:
```javascript
// detectFileConflicts(tasks)
// Build fileMap: { "file-path": [{ task_id, task_title, source_domain, changes }] }
// For each file with modifications from multiple domains:
// → conflict: type='file_conflict', severity='high'
// → include: file, tasks_involved, domains_involved, changes
// → resolution: 'Coordinate modification order or merge changes'
// detectDependencyCycles(tasks)
// Build dependency graph: { taskId: [dependsOn_taskIds] }
// DFS with recursion stack to detect cycles:
function detectCycles(tasks) {
const graph = new Map(tasks.map(t => [t.id, t.depends_on || []]))
const visited = new Set(), inStack = new Set(), cycles = []
function dfs(node, path) {
if (inStack.has(node)) { cycles.push([...path, node].join(' → ')); return }
if (visited.has(node)) return
visited.add(node); inStack.add(node)
;(graph.get(node) || []).forEach(dep => dfs(dep, [...path, node]))
inStack.delete(node)
}
tasks.forEach(t => { if (!visited.has(t.id)) dfs(t.id, []) })
return cycles
}
// detectStrategyConflicts(tasks)
// Group tasks by files they modify (from task.files[].path)
// For each file with tasks from multiple domains:
// Filter for tasks with files[].conflict_risk === 'high' or 'medium'
// If >1 high-risk from different domains:
// → conflict: type='strategy_conflict', severity='medium'
// → resolution: 'Review approaches and align on single strategy'
```
### Step 3.3: Generate Conflict Artifacts
Write conflict results and update plan-note.md.
```javascript
// 1. Write conflicts.json
Write(`${sessionFolder}/conflicts.json`, JSON.stringify({
detected_at: getUtc8ISOString(),
total_tasks: allTasks.length,
total_domains: subDomains.length,
total_conflicts: allConflicts.length,
conflicts: allConflicts // { type, severity, tasks_involved, description, suggested_resolution }
}, null, 2))
// 2. Update plan-note.md "## 冲突标记" section
// generateConflictMarkdown(conflicts):
// If empty: return '✅ 无冲突检测到'
// For each conflict:
// ### CONFLICT-{padded_index}: {description}
// - **严重程度**: critical | high | medium
// - **涉及任务**: TASK-xxx, TASK-yyy
// - **涉及领域**: domain-a, domain-b
// - **问题详情**: (based on conflict type)
// - **建议解决方案**: ...
// - **决策状态**: [ ] 待解决
// replaceSectionContent(markdown, sectionHeading, newContent):
// Find section heading position via regex
// Find next heading of same or higher level
// Replace content between heading and next section
// If section not found: append at end
```
**Success Criteria**:
- All tasks extracted and analyzed
- `conflicts.json` written with detection results
- `plan-note.md` updated with conflict markers
- All conflict types checked (file, dependency, strategy)
---
## Phase 4: Completion
**Objective**: Generate human-readable plan summary and finalize workflow.
### Step 4.1: Merge Domain tasks.jsonl
Merge all per-domain JSONL files into a single session-level `tasks.jsonl`.
```javascript
// Collect all domain tasks
const allDomainTasks = []
for (const sub of subDomains) {
const jsonl = Read(`${sessionFolder}/domains/${sub.focus_area}/tasks.jsonl`)
jsonl.split('\n').filter(l => l.trim()).forEach(line => {
allDomainTasks.push(JSON.parse(line))
})
}
// Write merged tasks.jsonl at session root
const mergedJsonl = allDomainTasks.map(t => JSON.stringify(t)).join('\n')
Write(`${sessionFolder}/tasks.jsonl`, mergedJsonl)
```
### Step 4.2: Generate plan.md
Create a human-readable summary from plan-note.md content.
**plan.md Structure**:
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| Header | Session ID, task description, creation time |
| 需求 (Requirements) | Copied from plan-note.md "需求理解" section |
| 子领域拆分 (Sub-Domains) | Each domain with description, task range, estimated effort |
| 任务概览 (Task Overview) | All tasks with complexity, dependencies, and target files |
| 冲突报告 (Conflict Report) | Summary of detected conflicts or "无冲突" |
| 执行指令 (Execution) | Command to execute the plan |
```javascript
const planMd = `# Collaborative Plan
**Session**: ${sessionId}
**Requirement**: ${taskDescription}
**Created**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
**Complexity**: ${complexity}
**Domains**: ${subDomains.length}
## 需求理解
${requirementSection}
## 子领域拆分
| # | Focus Area | Description | TASK Range | Effort |
|---|-----------|-------------|------------|--------|
${subDomains.map((s, i) => `| ${i+1} | ${s.focus_area} | ${s.description} | ${s.task_id_range[0]}-${s.task_id_range[1]} | ${s.estimated_effort} |`).join('\n')}
## 任务概览
${subDomains.map(sub => {
const domainTasks = allTasks.filter(t => t.source?.original_id?.startsWith('TASK') && t.source?.session_id === sessionId)
return `### ${sub.focus_area}\n\n` +
domainTasks.map(t => `- **${t.id}**: ${t.title} (${t.type}, ${t.effort}) ${t.depends_on.length ? '← ' + t.depends_on.join(', ') : ''}`).join('\n')
}).join('\n\n')}
## 冲突报告
${allConflicts.length === 0
? '✅ 无冲突检测到'
: allConflicts.map(c => `- **${c.type}** (${c.severity}): ${c.description}`).join('\n')}
## 执行
\`\`\`bash
/workflow:unified-execute-with-file PLAN="${sessionFolder}/tasks.jsonl"
\`\`\`
**Session artifacts**: \`${sessionFolder}/\`
`
Write(`${sessionFolder}/plan.md`, planMd)
```
### Step 4.3: Display Completion Summary
Present session statistics and next steps.
```javascript
// Display:
// - Session ID and directory path
// - Total domains planned
// - Total tasks generated
// - Conflict status (count and severity)
// - Execution command for next step
if (!autoMode) {
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: `规划完成:\n- ${subDomains.length} 个子领域\n- ${allTasks.length} 个任务\n- ${allConflicts.length} 个冲突\n\n下一步:`,
header: "Next Step",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Execute Plan", description: "使用 unified-execute 执行计划" },
{ label: "Review Conflicts", description: "查看并解决冲突" },
{ label: "Export", description: "导出 plan.md" },
{ label: "Done", description: "保存产物,稍后执行" }
]
}]
})
}
```
| Selection | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Execute Plan | `Skill(skill="workflow:unified-execute-with-file", args="PLAN=\"${sessionFolder}/tasks.jsonl\"")` |
| Review Conflicts | Display conflicts.json content for manual resolution |
| Export | Copy plan.md + plan-note.md to user-specified location |
| Done | Display artifact paths, end workflow |
**Success Criteria**:
- `plan.md` generated with complete summary
- `tasks.jsonl` merged at session root (consumable by unified-execute)
- All artifacts present in session directory
- User informed of completion and next steps
---
## Configuration
| Flag | Default | Description |
|------|---------|-------------|
| `--max-domains` | 5 | Maximum sub-domains to identify |
| `-y, --yes` | false | Auto-confirm all decisions |
## Iteration Patterns
### New Planning Session
```
User initiates: TASK="task description"
├─ No session exists → New session mode
├─ Analyze task with inline search tools
├─ Identify sub-domains
├─ Create plan-note.md template
├─ Generate requirement-analysis.json
├─ Serial domain planning:
│ ├─ Domain 1: explore → tasks.jsonl → fill plan-note.md
│ ├─ Domain 2: explore → tasks.jsonl → fill plan-note.md
│ └─ Domain N: ...
├─ Merge domain tasks.jsonl → session tasks.jsonl
├─ Verify plan-note.md consistency
├─ Detect conflicts
├─ Generate plan.md summary
└─ Report completion
```
### Continue Existing Session
```
User resumes: TASK="same task"
├─ Session exists → Continue mode
├─ Load plan-note.md and requirement-analysis.json
├─ Identify incomplete domains (empty task pool sections)
├─ Plan remaining domains serially
└─ Continue with conflict detection
```
---
## Error Handling & Recovery
| Situation | Action | Recovery |
|-----------|--------|----------|
| No codebase detected | Normal flow, pure requirement planning | Proceed without codebase context |
| Codebase search fails | Continue with available context | Note limitation in plan-note.md |
| Domain planning fails | Record error, continue with next domain | Retry failed domain or plan manually |
| Section not found in plan-note | Create section defensively | Continue with new section |
| No tasks generated for a domain | Review domain description | Refine scope and retry |
| Conflict detection fails | Continue with empty conflicts | Note in completion summary |
| Session folder conflict | Append timestamp suffix | Create unique folder |
| plan-note.md format inconsistency | Validate and fix format after each domain | Re-read and normalize |
---
## Best Practices
### Before Starting Planning
1. **Clear Task Description**: Detailed requirements lead to better sub-domain splitting
2. **Reference Documentation**: Ensure latest README and design docs are identified during Phase 1
3. **Clarify Ambiguities**: Resolve unclear requirements before committing to sub-domains
### During Planning
1. **Review Plan Note**: Check plan-note.md between domains to verify progress
2. **Verify Independence**: Ensure sub-domains are truly independent and have minimal overlap
3. **Check Dependencies**: Cross-domain dependencies should be documented explicitly
4. **Inspect Details**: Review `domains/{domain}/tasks.jsonl` for specifics when needed
5. **Consistent Format**: Follow task summary format strictly across all domains
6. **TASK ID Isolation**: Use pre-assigned non-overlapping ranges to prevent ID conflicts
### After Planning
1. **Resolve Conflicts**: Address high/critical conflicts before execution
2. **Review Summary**: Check plan.md for completeness and accuracy
3. **Validate Tasks**: Ensure all tasks have clear scope and modification targets
## When to Use
**Use collaborative-plan-with-file when:**
- A complex task spans multiple sub-domains (backend + frontend + database, etc.)
- Need structured multi-domain task breakdown with conflict detection
- Planning a feature that touches many parts of the codebase
- Want pre-allocated section organization for clear domain separation
**Use lite-plan when:**
- Single domain, clear task with no sub-domain splitting needed
- Quick planning without conflict detection
**Use req-plan-with-file when:**
- Requirement-level progressive roadmap needed (MVP → iterations)
- Higher-level decomposition before detailed planning
**Use analyze-with-file when:**
- Need in-depth analysis before planning
- Understanding and discussion, not task generation
---
**Now execute collaborative-plan-with-file for**: $ARGUMENTS