mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-10 02:24:35 +08:00
- Create brainstorming-framework.md to centralize common techniques and execution modes - Simplify conceptual-planning-agent.md from 280 to 170 lines (39% reduction) - Update all 9 brainstorm commands to reference framework instead of agent - Eliminate circular dependencies and improve maintainability Key improvements: - Separated concerns: principles -> framework -> commands -> agent - Role definitions now only exist in their respective command files - Creative techniques centralized in framework file - Agent focused solely on execution logic - Clear hierarchical reference structure without duplication 🤖 Generated with Claude Code Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
169 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
169 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
# Brainstorming Framework
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
Common creative techniques, execution modes, and quality standards for all brainstorming sessions.
|
|
|
|
## Creative Techniques
|
|
|
|
### SCAMPER Method
|
|
- **Substitute**: What can be substituted or replaced?
|
|
- **Combine**: What can be combined or merged?
|
|
- **Adapt**: What can be adapted from elsewhere?
|
|
- **Modify**: What can be magnified, minimized, or modified?
|
|
- **Put to other uses**: How else can this be used?
|
|
- **Eliminate**: What can be removed or simplified?
|
|
- **Reverse**: What can be rearranged or reversed?
|
|
|
|
### Six Thinking Hats
|
|
- **White Hat**: Facts, information, data
|
|
- **Red Hat**: Emotions, feelings, intuition
|
|
- **Black Hat**: Critical judgment, caution, problems
|
|
- **Yellow Hat**: Optimism, benefits, positive thinking
|
|
- **Green Hat**: Creativity, alternatives, new ideas
|
|
- **Blue Hat**: Process control, meta-thinking
|
|
|
|
### Additional Techniques
|
|
- **Mind Mapping**: Visual idea exploration and connection
|
|
- **Brainstorming**: Free-flowing idea generation
|
|
- **Brainwriting**: Silent idea generation and building
|
|
- **Random Word**: Stimulus-based creative thinking
|
|
- **What If**: Scenario-based exploration
|
|
- **Assumption Challenging**: Question fundamental assumptions
|
|
|
|
## Execution Modes
|
|
|
|
### Creative Mode (Default)
|
|
- **Techniques**: SCAMPER, Six Thinking Hats, wild ideas
|
|
- **Focus**: Innovation and unconventional solutions
|
|
- **Approach**:
|
|
- Emphasize divergent thinking and wild ideas
|
|
- Apply creative techniques extensively
|
|
- Encourage "what if" thinking and assumption challenging
|
|
- Focus on novel and unconventional solutions
|
|
|
|
### Analytical Mode
|
|
- **Techniques**: Root cause analysis, data-driven insights
|
|
- **Focus**: Evidence-based systematic problem-solving
|
|
- **Approach**:
|
|
- Use structured analysis frameworks
|
|
- Apply root cause analysis and logical thinking
|
|
- Emphasize evidence-based reasoning
|
|
- Focus on systematic problem-solving
|
|
|
|
### Strategic Mode
|
|
- **Techniques**: Systems thinking, scenario planning
|
|
- **Focus**: Long-term strategic positioning
|
|
- **Approach**:
|
|
- Apply strategic thinking frameworks
|
|
- Use systems thinking and long-term perspective
|
|
- Consider competitive dynamics and market forces
|
|
- Focus on strategic positioning and advantage
|
|
|
|
## Brainstorming Session Protocol
|
|
|
|
### Input Processing
|
|
```
|
|
Topic: [Challenge or opportunity description]
|
|
Mode: [creative|analytical|strategic]
|
|
Perspectives: [Selected role perspectives]
|
|
Context: [Current situation and constraints]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Execution Flow
|
|
```
|
|
1. Challenge Analysis → Define scope, constraints, success criteria
|
|
2. Perspective Setup → Establish role contexts and viewpoints
|
|
3. Ideation Phase → Generate ideas using appropriate techniques
|
|
4. Convergence Phase → Evaluate, synthesize, prioritize solutions
|
|
5. Documentation → Create structured session records
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Documentation Standards
|
|
|
|
### Session Summary Generation
|
|
Generate comprehensive session documentation including:
|
|
- Session metadata and configuration
|
|
- Challenge definition and scope
|
|
- Key insights and patterns
|
|
- Generated ideas with descriptions
|
|
- Perspective analysis from each role
|
|
- Evaluation and prioritization
|
|
- Recommendations and next steps
|
|
|
|
### Idea Documentation
|
|
For each significant idea, create detailed documentation:
|
|
- Concept description and core mechanism
|
|
- Multi-perspective analysis and implications
|
|
- Feasibility assessment (technical, resource, timeline)
|
|
- Impact potential (user, business, technical)
|
|
- Implementation considerations and prerequisites
|
|
- Success metrics and validation approach
|
|
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
|
|
|
|
## Output Format Standards
|
|
|
|
### Brainstorming Session Output
|
|
```
|
|
BRAINSTORMING_SUMMARY: [Comprehensive session overview]
|
|
CHALLENGE_DEFINITION: [Clear problem space definition]
|
|
KEY_INSIGHTS: [Major discoveries and patterns]
|
|
IDEA_INVENTORY: [Structured list of all generated ideas]
|
|
TOP_CONCEPTS: [5 most promising solutions with analysis]
|
|
PERSPECTIVE_SYNTHESIS: [Integration of role-based insights]
|
|
FEASIBILITY_ASSESSMENT: [Technical and resource evaluation]
|
|
IMPACT_ANALYSIS: [Expected outcomes and benefits]
|
|
RECOMMENDATIONS: [Prioritized next steps and actions]
|
|
WORKFLOW_INTEGRATION: [If applicable, workflow handoff preparation]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Multi-Role Analysis Output
|
|
```
|
|
ROLE_COORDINATION: [How perspectives were integrated]
|
|
PERSPECTIVE_INSIGHTS: [Key insights from each role]
|
|
SYNTHESIS_RESULTS: [Combined perspective analysis]
|
|
CONFLICT_RESOLUTION: [How role conflicts were addressed]
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE_COVERAGE: [Confirmation all aspects considered]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### Effective Session Facilitation
|
|
- **Clear Structure** → Follow defined phases and maintain session flow
|
|
- **Inclusive Participation** → Ensure all perspectives are heard and valued
|
|
- **Creative Environment** → Maintain judgment-free ideation atmosphere
|
|
- **Productive Tension** → Balance creativity with practical constraints
|
|
- **Actionable Outcomes** → Generate concrete next steps and recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Perspective Integration
|
|
- **Authentic Representation** → Accurately channel each role's mental models
|
|
- **Balanced Coverage** → Give appropriate attention to all perspectives
|
|
- **Constructive Synthesis** → Combine insights into stronger solutions
|
|
- **Conflict Navigation** → Address perspective tensions constructively
|
|
- **Comprehensive Analysis** → Ensure no critical aspects are overlooked
|
|
|
|
### Documentation Quality
|
|
- **Structured Capture** → Organize insights and ideas systematically
|
|
- **Clear Communication** → Present complex ideas in accessible format
|
|
- **Decision Support** → Provide frameworks for evaluating options
|
|
- **Implementation Ready** → Prepare outputs for next development phases
|
|
- **Traceability** → Maintain clear links between ideas and analysis
|
|
|
|
## Integration Guidelines
|
|
|
|
### With Brainstorming Principles
|
|
This framework works in conjunction with @~/.claude/workflows/brainstorming-principles.md which defines:
|
|
- Project structure establishment
|
|
- Session initialization requirements
|
|
- Directory creation protocols
|
|
- Agent coordination standards
|
|
|
|
### With Role Commands
|
|
Each role-specific brainstorm command implements this framework within their domain context:
|
|
- Applies appropriate techniques for their perspective
|
|
- Uses mode selection based on problem type
|
|
- Follows documentation standards
|
|
- Maintains quality criteria
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
This framework provides the common foundation for all brainstorming activities while allowing role-specific customization and focus. |