Files
Claude-Code-Workflow/.codex/skills/numerical-analysis-workflow/schemas/tasks-schema.md
catlog22 f389e3e6dd feat: add dynamic pipeline detection for team sessions v5 architecture
Backend:
- Fix readLegacyFiles to handle { name, prefix }[] role format
- Add roles backfill in getEffectiveTeamMeta when meta.json exists
- Ensure pipeline_stages and roles flow correctly to API response

Team Skills:
- Add pipeline metadata initialization to all 16 team skill coordinator roles
- Each skill now reports pipeline_stages and roles to meta.json at session init

Documentation:
- Update command references and component documentation
- Add numerical-analysis-workflow skill spec
- Sync zh/en translations for commands and components
2026-03-04 14:52:07 +08:00

163 lines
10 KiB
Markdown

# Numerical Analysis Workflow — CSV Schema
## Master CSV: tasks.csv
### Column Definitions
#### Input Columns (Set by Decomposer)
| Column | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|--------|------|----------|-------------|---------|
| `id` | string | Yes | Unique task identifier (T{wave}.{track}) | `"T2.1"` |
| `title` | string | Yes | Short task title | `"Mathematical Formulation"` |
| `description` | string | Yes | Detailed task description (self-contained) | `"Derive precise mathematical formulations..."` |
| `track_role` | string | Yes | Analysis role name | `"Mathematician"` |
| `analysis_dimension` | string | Yes | Analysis focus area | `"formula_derivation"` |
| `formula_refs` | string | No | References to formulas from earlier tasks (TaskID:formula_name;...) | `"T1.1:governing_eqs;T2.2:convergence_conds"` |
| `precision_req` | string | No | Required floating-point precision | `"double"` |
| `scope` | string | No | File/directory scope for analysis (glob) | `"src/solver/**"` |
| `deps` | string | No | Semicolon-separated dependency task IDs | `"T2.1;T2.2"` |
| `context_from` | string | No | Semicolon-separated task IDs for context | `"T1.1;T2.1"` |
#### Computed Columns (Set by Wave Engine)
| Column | Type | Description | Example |
|--------|------|-------------|---------|
| `wave` | integer | Wave number (1-6, fixed per diamond topology) | `3` |
| `prev_context` | string | Aggregated findings + formulas from context_from tasks (per-wave CSV only) | `"[T2.1] Weak form derived..."` |
#### Output Columns (Set by Agent)
| Column | Type | Description | Example |
|--------|------|-------------|---------|
| `status` | enum | `pending``completed` / `failed` / `skipped` | `"completed"` |
| `findings` | string | Key discoveries (max 500 chars) | `"Identified CFL condition..."` |
| `severity_distribution` | string | Issue counts by severity | `"Critical:0 High:2 Medium:3 Low:1"` |
| `latex_formulas` | string | Key LaTeX formulas (semicolon-separated) | `"\\Delta t \\leq \\frac{h}{c};\\kappa(A) = \\|A\\|\\|A^{-1}\\|"` |
| `doc_path` | string | Path to generated analysis document | `"docs/P3_Numerical_Stability_Report.md"` |
| `error` | string | Error message if failed | `""` |
---
### Example Data
```csv
id,title,description,track_role,analysis_dimension,formula_refs,precision_req,scope,deps,context_from,wave,status,findings,severity_distribution,latex_formulas,doc_path,error
"T1.1","Problem Domain Survey","Survey governing equations and mathematical models. Identify PDE types, boundary conditions, conservation laws, and physical domain.","Problem_Domain_Analyst","domain_modeling","","","src/**","","","1","completed","Identified Navier-Stokes equations with k-epsilon turbulence model. Incompressible flow assumption. No-slip boundary conditions.","Critical:0 High:0 Medium:1 Low:2","\\rho(\\frac{\\partial v}{\\partial t} + v \\cdot \\nabla v) = -\\nabla p + \\mu \\nabla^2 v","docs/P1_Domain_Survey.md",""
"T2.1","Mathematical Formulation","Derive precise mathematical formulations using LaTeX. Transform governing equations into weak forms suitable for FEM discretization.","Mathematician","formula_derivation","T1.1:governing_eqs","","src/**","T1.1","T1.1","2","completed","Weak form derived for NS equations. Galerkin formulation with inf-sup stable elements (Taylor-Hood P2/P1).","Critical:0 High:0 Medium:0 Low:1","\\int_\\Omega \\mu \\nabla u : \\nabla v \\, d\\Omega - \\int_\\Omega p \\nabla \\cdot v \\, d\\Omega = \\int_\\Omega f \\cdot v \\, d\\Omega","docs/P2_Mathematical_Formulation.md",""
"T3.2","Numerical Stability Report","Analyze numerical stability of selected algorithms. Evaluate condition numbers, error propagation characteristics, and precision requirements.","Stability_Analyst","stability_analysis","T2.1:weak_forms;T2.2:convergence_conds","double","src/solver/**","T2.1;T2.2","T2.1;T2.2","3","pending","","","","",""
```
---
### Column Lifecycle
```
Decomposer (Phase 1) Wave Engine (Phase 2) Agent (Execution)
───────────────────── ──────────────────── ─────────────────
id ───────────► id ──────────► id
title ───────────► title ──────────► (reads)
description ───────────► description ──────────► (reads)
track_role ───────────► track_role ──────────► (reads)
analysis_dimension ─────► analysis_dimension ────► (reads)
formula_refs ──────────► formula_refs ─────────► (reads)
precision_req ─────────► precision_req ─────────► (reads)
scope ───────────► scope ──────────► (reads)
deps ───────────► deps ──────────► (reads)
context_from───────────► context_from──────────► (reads)
wave ──────────► (reads)
prev_context ──────────► (reads)
status
findings
severity_distribution
latex_formulas
doc_path
error
```
---
## Output Schema (JSON)
Agent output via `report_agent_job_result`:
```json
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"id": { "type": "string", "description": "Task ID (T{wave}.{track})" },
"status": { "type": "string", "enum": ["completed", "failed"] },
"findings": { "type": "string", "description": "Key discoveries, max 500 chars" },
"severity_distribution": { "type": "string", "description": "Critical:N High:N Medium:N Low:N" },
"latex_formulas": { "type": "string", "description": "Key formulas in LaTeX, semicolon-separated" },
"doc_path": { "type": "string", "description": "Path to generated analysis document" },
"error": { "type": "string", "description": "Error message if failed" }
},
"required": ["id", "status", "findings"]
}
```
---
## Discovery Types
| Type | Dedup Key | Data Schema | Description |
|------|-----------|-------------|-------------|
| `governing_equation` | `eq_name` | `{eq_name, latex, domain, boundary_conditions}` | Governing equations found |
| `numerical_method` | `method_name` | `{method_name, type, order, stability_class}` | Numerical methods identified |
| `stability_issue` | `location` | `{location, condition_number, severity, description}` | Stability concerns |
| `convergence_property` | `method` | `{method, rate, order, conditions}` | Convergence properties |
| `precision_risk` | `location+operation` | `{location, operation, risk_type, recommendation}` | Float precision risks |
| `performance_bottleneck` | `location` | `{location, operation_count, memory_pattern, suggestion}` | Performance bottlenecks |
| `architecture_pattern` | `pattern_name` | `{pattern_name, files, description}` | Architecture patterns |
| `test_gap` | `component` | `{component, missing_coverage, priority}` | Missing test coverage |
### Discovery NDJSON Format
```jsonl
{"ts":"2026-03-04T10:00:00Z","worker":"T1.1","type":"governing_equation","data":{"eq_name":"Navier-Stokes","latex":"\\rho(\\frac{\\partial v}{\\partial t} + v \\cdot \\nabla v) = -\\nabla p + \\mu \\nabla^2 v","domain":"fluid_dynamics","boundary_conditions":"no-slip walls"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-04T10:05:00Z","worker":"T2.2","type":"convergence_property","data":{"method":"Galerkin FEM","rate":"optimal","order":"h^{k+1}","conditions":"quasi-uniform mesh"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-04T10:10:00Z","worker":"T3.2","type":"stability_issue","data":{"location":"src/solver/assembler.rs:142","condition_number":"1e12","severity":"High","description":"Ill-conditioned stiffness matrix"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-04T10:15:00Z","worker":"T5.3","type":"precision_risk","data":{"location":"src/solver/residual.rs:87","operation":"subtraction of nearly equal values","risk_type":"catastrophic_cancellation","recommendation":"Use compensated summation or reformulate"}}
```
---
## Validation Rules
| Rule | Check | Error |
|------|-------|-------|
| Unique IDs | No duplicate `id` values | "Duplicate task ID: {id}" |
| Valid deps | All dep IDs exist in tasks | "Unknown dependency: {dep_id}" |
| No self-deps | Task cannot depend on itself | "Self-dependency: {id}" |
| No circular deps | Topological sort completes | "Circular dependency detected involving: {ids}" |
| context_from valid | All context IDs exist and in earlier waves | "Invalid context_from: {id}" |
| Description non-empty | Every task has description | "Empty description for task: {id}" |
| Status enum | status in {pending, completed, failed, skipped} | "Invalid status: {status}" |
| Wave range | wave in {1..6} | "Invalid wave number: {wave}" |
| Track role valid | track_role matches known roles | "Unknown track_role: {role}" |
| Formula refs format | TaskID:formula_name pattern | "Malformed formula_refs: {value}" |
### Analysis Dimension Values
| Dimension | Used In Wave | Description |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|
| `domain_modeling` | 1 | Physical/mathematical domain survey |
| `architecture_analysis` | 1 | Software architecture analysis |
| `validation_design` | 1 | Validation and benchmark strategy |
| `formula_derivation` | 2 | Mathematical formulation and derivation |
| `convergence_analysis` | 2 | Convergence theory and error bounds |
| `complexity_analysis` | 2 | Computational complexity analysis |
| `method_selection` | 3 | Numerical method selection and design |
| `stability_analysis` | 3 | Numerical stability assessment |
| `performance_modeling` | 3 | Performance prediction and modeling |
| `implementation_analysis` | 4 | Module-level code analysis |
| `data_structure_review` | 4 | Data structure and memory layout review |
| `interface_analysis` | 4 | API contract and interface analysis |
| `optimization` | 5 | Function-level performance optimization |
| `edge_case_analysis` | 5 | Boundary and singularity handling |
| `precision_audit` | 5 | Floating-point precision audit |
| `integration_testing` | 6 | System integration testing |
| `benchmarking` | 6 | Performance benchmarking |
| `quality_assurance` | 6 | Final quality audit and synthesis |