- Add worktree module for git worktree management - Refactor do skill scripts from shell to Python for better maintainability - Add install.py for do skill installation - Update stop-hook to Python implementation - Enhance executor with additional configuration options - Update CLAUDE.md with first-principles thinking guidelines Generated with SWE-Agent.ai Co-Authored-By: SWE-Agent.ai <noreply@swe-agent.ai>
9.7 KiB
name, description, allowed-tools
| name | description | allowed-tools | |
|---|---|---|---|
| do | This skill should be used for structured feature development with codebase understanding. Triggers on /do command. Provides a 5-phase workflow (Understand, Clarify, Design, Implement, Complete) using codeagent-wrapper to orchestrate code-explorer, code-architect, code-reviewer, and develop agents in parallel. |
|
do - Feature Development Orchestrator
An orchestrator for systematic feature development. Invoke agents via codeagent-wrapper, never write code directly.
Loop Initialization (REQUIRED)
When triggered via /do <task>, follow these steps:
Step 1: Ask about worktree mode
Use AskUserQuestion to ask:
Develop in a separate worktree? (Isolates changes from main branch)
- Yes (Recommended for larger changes)
- No (Work directly in current directory)
Step 2: Initialize state
# If worktree mode selected:
python3 "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/setup-do.py" --worktree "<task description>"
# If no worktree:
python3 "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/setup-do.py" "<task description>"
This creates .claude/do.{task_id}.local.md with:
active: truecurrent_phase: 1max_phases: 5completion_promise: "<promise>DO_COMPLETE</promise>"use_worktree: true/false
Worktree Mode
When use_worktree: true in state file, ALL codeagent-wrapper calls that modify code MUST include --worktree:
# With worktree mode enabled
codeagent-wrapper --worktree --agent develop - . <<'EOF'
...
EOF
# Parallel tasks with worktree
codeagent-wrapper --worktree --parallel <<'EOF'
---TASK---
id: task1
agent: develop
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
...
EOF
The --worktree flag tells codeagent-wrapper to create/use a worktree internally. Read-only agents (code-explorer, code-architect, code-reviewer) do NOT need --worktree.
Loop State Management
After each phase, update .claude/do.{task_id}.local.md frontmatter:
current_phase: <next phase number>
phase_name: "<next phase name>"
When all 5 phases complete, output the completion signal:
<promise>DO_COMPLETE</promise>
To abort early, set active: false in the state file.
Hard Constraints
- Never write code directly. Delegate all code changes to
codeagent-wrapperagents. - Pass complete context forward. Every agent invocation includes the Context Pack.
- Parallel-first. Run independent tasks via
codeagent-wrapper --parallel. - Update state after each phase. Keep
.claude/do.{task_id}.local.mdcurrent. - Expect long-running
codeagent-wrappercalls. High-reasoning modes can take a long time; stay in the orchestrator role and wait for agents to complete. - Timeouts are not an escape hatch. If a
codeagent-wrapperinvocation times out/errors, retry (split/narrow the task if needed); never switch to direct implementation. - Respect worktree setting. If
use_worktree: true, always pass--worktreeto develop agent calls.
Agents
| Agent | Purpose | Needs --worktree |
|---|---|---|
code-explorer |
Trace code, map architecture, find patterns | No (read-only) |
code-architect |
Design approaches, file plans, build sequences | No (read-only) |
code-reviewer |
Review for bugs, simplicity, conventions | No (read-only) |
develop |
Implement code, run tests | Yes (if worktree enabled) |
Issue Severity Definitions
Blocking issues (require user input):
- Impacts core functionality or correctness
- Security vulnerabilities
- Architectural conflicts with existing patterns
- Ambiguous requirements with multiple valid interpretations
Minor issues (auto-fix without asking):
- Code style inconsistencies
- Naming improvements
- Missing documentation
- Non-critical test coverage gaps
Context Pack Template
## Original User Request
<verbatim request>
## Context Pack
- Phase: <1-5 name>
- Decisions: <requirements/constraints/choices>
- Code-explorer output: <paste or "None">
- Code-architect output: <paste or "None">
- Code-reviewer output: <paste or "None">
- Develop output: <paste or "None">
- Open questions: <list or "None">
## Current Task
<specific task>
## Acceptance Criteria
<checkable outputs>
5-Phase Workflow
Phase 1: Understand (Parallel, No Interaction)
Goal: Understand requirements and map codebase simultaneously.
Actions: Run code-architect and 2-3 code-explorer tasks in parallel.
codeagent-wrapper --parallel <<'EOF'
---TASK---
id: p1_requirements
agent: code-architect
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Context Pack
- Code-explorer output: None
- Code-architect output: None
## Current Task
1. Analyze requirements completeness (score 1-10)
2. Extract explicit requirements, constraints, acceptance criteria
3. Identify blocking questions (issues that prevent implementation)
4. Identify minor clarifications (nice-to-have but can proceed without)
Output format:
- Completeness score: X/10
- Requirements: [list]
- Non-goals: [list]
- Blocking questions: [list, if any]
- Minor clarifications: [list, if any]
## Acceptance Criteria
Concrete checklist; blocking vs minor questions clearly separated.
---TASK---
id: p1_similar_features
agent: code-explorer
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Current Task
Find 1-3 similar features, trace end-to-end. Return: key files with line numbers, call flow, extension points.
## Acceptance Criteria
Concrete file:line map + reuse points.
---TASK---
id: p1_architecture
agent: code-explorer
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Current Task
Map architecture for relevant subsystem. Return: module map + 5-10 key files.
## Acceptance Criteria
Clear boundaries; file:line references.
---TASK---
id: p1_conventions
agent: code-explorer
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Current Task
Identify testing patterns, conventions, config. Return: test commands + file locations.
## Acceptance Criteria
Test commands + relevant test file paths.
EOF
Phase 2: Clarify (Conditional)
Goal: Resolve blocking ambiguities only.
Actions:
- Review
p1_requirementsoutput for blocking questions - IF blocking questions exist → Use AskUserQuestion
- IF no blocking questions (completeness >= 8) → Skip to Phase 3, log "Requirements clear, proceeding"
# Only if blocking questions exist:
# Use AskUserQuestion with the blocking questions from Phase 1
Phase 3: Design (No Interaction)
Goal: Produce minimal-change implementation plan.
Actions: Invoke code-architect with all Phase 1 context to generate a single implementation plan.
codeagent-wrapper --agent code-architect - . <<'EOF'
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Context Pack
- Code-explorer output: <ALL Phase 1 explorer outputs>
- Code-architect output: <Phase 1 requirements + Phase 2 answers if any>
## Current Task
Design minimal-change implementation:
- Reuse existing abstractions
- Minimize new files
- Follow established patterns from code-explorer output
Output:
- File touch list with specific changes
- Build sequence
- Test plan
- Risks and mitigations
## Acceptance Criteria
Concrete, implementable blueprint with minimal moving parts.
EOF
Phase 4: Implement + Review (Single Interaction Point)
Goal: Build feature and review in one phase.
Actions:
- Invoke
developto implement (add--worktreeifuse_worktree: true):
# Check use_worktree from state file, add --worktree if true
codeagent-wrapper --worktree --agent develop - . <<'EOF'
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Context Pack
- Code-explorer output: <ALL Phase 1 outputs>
- Code-architect output: <Phase 3 blueprint>
## Current Task
Implement with minimal change set following the blueprint.
- Follow Phase 1 patterns
- Add/adjust tests per Phase 3 plan
- Run narrowest relevant tests
## Acceptance Criteria
Feature works end-to-end; tests pass; diff is minimal.
EOF
- Run parallel reviews (no --worktree needed, read-only):
codeagent-wrapper --parallel <<'EOF'
---TASK---
id: p4_correctness
agent: code-reviewer
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Context Pack
- Code-architect output: <Phase 3 blueprint>
- Develop output: <implementation output>
## Current Task
Review for correctness, edge cases, failure modes.
Classify each issue as BLOCKING or MINOR.
## Acceptance Criteria
Issues with file:line references, severity, and concrete fixes.
---TASK---
id: p4_simplicity
agent: code-reviewer
workdir: .
---CONTENT---
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Context Pack
- Code-architect output: <Phase 3 blueprint>
- Develop output: <implementation output>
## Current Task
Review for KISS: remove bloat, collapse needless abstractions.
Classify each issue as BLOCKING or MINOR.
## Acceptance Criteria
Actionable simplifications with severity and justification.
EOF
- Handle review results:
- MINOR issues only → Auto-fix via
develop(with--worktreeif enabled), no user interaction - BLOCKING issues → Use AskUserQuestion: "Fix now / Proceed as-is"
- MINOR issues only → Auto-fix via
Phase 5: Complete (No Interaction)
Goal: Document what was built.
Actions: Invoke code-reviewer to produce summary:
codeagent-wrapper --agent code-reviewer - . <<'EOF'
## Original User Request
/do <request>
## Context Pack
- Code-architect output: <Phase 3 blueprint>
- Code-reviewer output: <Phase 4 review outcomes>
- Develop output: <Phase 4 implementation + fixes>
## Current Task
Write completion summary:
- What was built
- Key decisions/tradeoffs
- Files modified (paths)
- How to verify (commands)
- Follow-ups (optional)
## Acceptance Criteria
Short, technical, actionable summary.
EOF
Output the completion signal:
<promise>DO_COMPLETE</promise>