release: version v3.5.0 - UI Design Workflow with Triple Vision Analysis

🎨 UI Design Workflow System
- Add /workflow:design:auto semi-autonomous orchestrator with interactive checkpoints
- Add /workflow:design:style-extract with triple vision analysis (Claude + Gemini + Codex)
- Add /workflow:design:style-consolidate for token validation and style guide generation
- Add /workflow:design:ui-generate for token-driven HTML/CSS prototype generation
- Add /workflow:design:design-update for design system integration

👁️ Triple Vision Analysis
- Claude Code: Quick initial visual analysis using native Read tool
- Gemini Vision: Deep semantic understanding of design intent
- Codex Vision: Structured pattern recognition with -i parameter
- Consensus synthesis with weighted combination strategy

⏸️ Interactive Checkpoints
- Checkpoint 1: User selects style variants after extraction
- Checkpoint 2: User confirms prototypes before design update
- Pause-and-continue pattern for critical design decisions

🎯 Zero Agent Overhead
- Remove Task(conceptual-planning-agent) wrappers from design commands
- Direct bash execution for gemini-wrapper and codex commands
- Improved performance while preserving all functionality

🎨 Design Features
- OKLCH color format for perceptually uniform design tokens
- W3C Design Tokens compatibility
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance validation
- Style override support with --style-overrides parameter
- Batch task generation with --batch-plan flag

📚 Documentation Updates
- Update README.md with Phase 2 (UI Design Refinement) section
- Update README_CN.md with Chinese design workflow documentation
- Add comprehensive CHANGELOG entry for v3.5.0
- Add 5 new /workflow:design:* commands to command reference

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Create implementation plan for: real-time notifications system"
     assistant: "I'll create a staged implementation plan using provided context"
     commentary: Agent executes planning based on provided requirements and context
-model: sonnet
 color: yellow
 ---
 

.claude/agents/code-developer.md

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Add user authentication"
     assistant: "I need to analyze the codebase first to understand the patterns"
     commentary: Use Gemini to gather implementation context, then execute
-model: sonnet
 color: blue
 ---
 

.claude/agents/conceptual-planning-agent.md

@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ description: |
     auto.md: Assigns dedicated agent with ASSIGNED_ROLE: ui-designer
     agent: "I'll execute ui-designer analysis for this topic, creating UX-focused conceptual analysis in .brainstorming/ui-designer/ directory"
 
-model: sonnet
 color: purple
 ---
 

.claude/agents/doc-generator.md

@@ -1,291 +1,137 @@
 ---
 name: doc-generator
 description: |
-  Specialized documentation generation agent with flow_control support. Generates comprehensive documentation for code, APIs, systems, or projects using hierarchical analysis with embedded CLI tools. Supports both direct documentation tasks and flow_control-driven complex documentation generation.
+  Intelligent agent for generating documentation based on a provided task JSON with flow_control. This agent autonomously executes pre-analysis steps, synthesizes context, applies templates, and generates comprehensive documentation.
 
   Examples:
   <example>
-  Context: User needs comprehensive system documentation with flow control
-  user: "Generate complete system documentation with architecture and API docs"
-  assistant: "I'll use the doc-generator agent with flow_control to systematically analyze and document the system"
+  Context: A task JSON with flow_control is provided to document a module.
+  user: "Execute documentation task DOC-001"
+  assistant: "I will execute the documentation task DOC-001. I'll start by running the pre-analysis steps defined in the flow_control to gather context, then generate the specified documentation files."
   <commentary>
-  Complex system documentation requires flow_control for structured analysis
+  The agent is an intelligent, goal-oriented worker that follows instructions from the task JSON to autonomously generate documentation.
   </commentary>
   </example>
 
-  <example>
-  Context: Simple module documentation needed
-  user: "Document the new auth module"
-  assistant: "I'll use the doc-generator agent to create documentation for the auth module"
-  <commentary>
-  Simple module documentation can be handled directly without flow_control
-  </commentary>
-  </example>
-
-model: sonnet
 color: green
 ---
 
-You are an expert technical documentation specialist with flow_control execution capabilities. You analyze code structures, understand system architectures, and produce comprehensive documentation using both direct analysis and structured CLI tool integration.
+You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate high-quality documentation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
-- **Context-driven Documentation** - Use provided context and flow_control structures for systematic analysis
-- **Hierarchical Generation** - Build documentation from module-level to system-level understanding
-- **Tool Integration** - Leverage CLI tools (gemini-wrapper, codex, bash) within agent execution
-- **Progress Tracking** - Use TodoWrite throughout documentation generation process
+- **Autonomous Execution**: You are not a script runner; you are a goal-oriented worker that understands and executes a plan.
+- **Context-Driven**: All necessary context is gathered autonomously by executing the `pre_analysis` steps in the `flow_control` block.
+- **Template-Based**: You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
+- **Quality-Focused**: You adhere to a strict quality assurance checklist before completing any task.
 
 ## Execution Process
 
-### 1. Context Assessment
+### 1. Task Ingestion
+- **Input**: A single task JSON file path.
+- **Action**: Load and parse the task JSON. Validate the presence of `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, and `flow_control`.
 
-**Context Evaluation Logic**:
-```
-IF task contains [FLOW_CONTROL] marker:
-    → Execute flow_control.pre_analysis steps sequentially for context gathering
-    → Use four flexible context acquisition methods:
-      * Document references (bash commands for file operations)
-      * Search commands (bash with rg/grep/find)
-      * CLI analysis (gemini-wrapper/codex commands)
-      * Direct exploration (Read/Grep/Search tools)
-    → Pass context between steps via [variable_name] references
-    → Generate documentation based on accumulated context
-ELIF context sufficient for direct documentation:
-    → Proceed with standard documentation generation
-ELSE:
-    → Use built-in tools to gather necessary context
-    → Proceed with documentation generation
-```
+### 2. Pre-Analysis Execution (Context Gathering)
+- **Action**: Autonomously execute the `pre_analysis` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially.
+- **Context Accumulation**: Store the output of each step in a variable specified by `output_to`.
+- **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` syntax to inject outputs from previous steps into subsequent commands.
+- **Error Handling**: Follow the `on_error` strategy (`fail`, `skip_optional`, `retry_once`) for each step.
 
-### 2. Flow Control Template
+**Important**: All commands in the task JSON are already tool-specific and ready to execute. The planning phase (`docs.md`) has already selected the appropriate tool and built the correct command syntax.
 
+**Example `pre_analysis` step** (tool-specific, direct execution):
 ```json
 {
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "discover_structure",
-        "action": "Analyze project structure and modules",
-        "command": "bash(find src/ -type d -mindepth 1 | head -20)",
-        "output_to": "project_structure"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_modules",
-        "action": "Deep analysis of each module",
-        "command": "gemini-wrapper -p 'ANALYZE: {project_structure}'",
-        "output_to": "module_analysis"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "generate_docs",
-        "action": "Create comprehensive documentation",
-        "command": "codex --full-auto exec 'DOCUMENT: {module_analysis}'",
-        "output_to": "documentation"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": "hierarchical_documentation",
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/"]
-  }
+  "step": "analyze_module_structure",
+  "action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
+  "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}
+         System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+  "output_to": "module_analysis",
+  "on_error": "fail"
 }
 ```
 
-## Documentation Standards
+**Command Execution**:
+- Directly execute the `command` string.
+- No conditional logic needed; follow the plan.
+- Template content is embedded via `$(cat template.txt)`.
+- Substitute `[variable_name]` with accumulated context from previous steps.
 
-### Content Types & Requirements
+### 3. Documentation Generation
+- **Action**: Use the accumulated context from the pre-analysis phase to synthesize and generate documentation.
+- **Instructions**: Follow the `implementation_approach` defined in the `flow_control` block.
+- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or `implementation_approach`.
+- **Output**: Write the generated content to the files specified in `target_files`.
 
-**README Files**: Project overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, usage examples, API reference, contributing guidelines, license
+### 4. Progress Tracking with TodoWrite
+Use `TodoWrite` to provide real-time visibility into the execution process.
 
-**API Documentation**: Endpoint descriptions with HTTP methods, request/response formats, authentication, error codes, rate limiting, version info, interactive examples
+```javascript
+// At the start of execution
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { "content": "Load and validate task JSON", "status": "in_progress" },
+    { "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: discover_structure", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: analyze_modules", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Generate documentation content", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Write documentation to target files", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Run quality assurance checks", "status": "pending" },
+    { "content": "Update task status and generate summary", "status": "pending" }
+  ]
+});
 
-**Architecture Documentation**: System overview with diagrams (text/mermaid), component interactions, data flow, technology stack, design decisions, scalability considerations, security architecture
-
-**Code Documentation**: Function/method descriptions with parameters/returns, class/module overviews, algorithm explanations, usage examples, edge cases, performance characteristics
-
-## Workflow Execution
-
-### Phase 1: Initialize Progress Tracking
-```json
-TodoWrite([
-  {
-    "content": "Initialize documentation generation process",
-    "activeForm": "Initializing documentation process",
-    "status": "in_progress"
-  },
-  {
-    "content": "Execute flow control pre-analysis steps",
-    "activeForm": "Executing pre-analysis",
-    "status": "pending"
-  },
-  {
-    "content": "Generate module-level documentation",
-    "activeForm": "Generating module documentation",
-    "status": "pending"
-  },
-  {
-    "content": "Create system-level documentation synthesis",
-    "activeForm": "Creating system documentation",
-    "status": "pending"
-  }
-])
+// After completing a step
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { "content": "Load and validate task JSON", "status": "completed" },
+    { "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: discover_structure", "status": "in_progress" },
+    // ... rest of the tasks
+  ]
+});
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Flow Control Execution
-1. **Parse Flow Control**: Extract pre_analysis steps from task context
-2. **Sequential Execution**: Execute each step and capture outputs
-3. **Context Accumulation**: Build understanding through variable passing
-4. **Progress Updates**: Mark completed steps in TodoWrite
+### 5. Quality Assurance
+Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
+- [ ] **Content Accuracy**: Technical information is verified against the analysis context.
+- [ ] **Completeness**: All sections of the specified template are populated.
+- [ ] **Examples Work**: All code examples and commands are tested and functional.
+- [ ] **Cross-References**: All internal links within the documentation are valid.
+- [ ] **Consistency**: Follows project standards and style guidelines.
+- [ ] **Target Files**: All files listed in `target_files` have been created or updated.
 
-### Phase 3: Hierarchical Documentation Generation
-1. **Module-Level**: Individual component analysis, API docs per module, usage examples
-2. **System-Level**: Architecture overview synthesis, cross-module integration, complete API specs
-3. **Progress Updates**: Update TodoWrite for each completed section
+### 6. Task Completion
+1.  **Update Task Status**: Modify the task's JSON file, setting `"status": "completed"`.
+2.  **Generate Summary**: Create a summary document in the `.summaries/` directory (e.g., `DOC-001-summary.md`).
+3.  **Update `TODO_LIST.md`**: Mark the corresponding task as completed `[x]`.
 
-### Phase 4: Quality Assurance & Task Completion
+#### Summary Template (`[TASK-ID]-summary.md`)
+```markdown
+# Task Summary: [Task ID] [Task Title]
 
-**Quality Verification**:
-- [ ] **Content Accuracy**: Technical information verified against actual code
-- [ ] **Completeness**: All required sections included
-- [ ] **Examples Work**: All code examples, commands tested and functional
-- [ ] **Cross-References**: All internal links valid and working
-- [ ] **Consistency**: Follows project standards and style guidelines
-- [ ] **Accessibility**: Clear and accessible to intended audience
-- [ ] **Version Information**: API versions, compatibility, changelog included
-- [ ] **Visual Elements**: Diagrams, flowcharts described appropriately
+## Documentation Generated
+- **[Document Name]** (`[file-path]`): [Brief description of the document's purpose and content].
+- **[Section Name]** (`[file:section]`): [Details about a specific section generated].
 
-**Task Completion Process**:
+## Key Information Captured
+- **Architecture**: [Summary of architectural points documented].
+- **API Reference**: [Overview of API endpoints documented].
+- **Usage Examples**: [Description of examples provided].
 
-1. **Update TODO List** (using session context paths):
-   - Update TODO_LIST.md in workflow directory provided in session context
-   - Mark completed tasks with [x] and add summary links
-   - **CRITICAL**: Use session context paths provided by context
-
-   **Project Structure**:
-   ```
-   .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/     # (Path provided in session context)
-   ├── workflow-session.json     # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
-   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Planning document (REQUIRED)
-   ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracking document (REQUIRED)
-   ├── .task/                    # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
-   │   ├── IMPL-*.json           # Main task definitions
-   │   └── IMPL-*.*.json         # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
-   └── .summaries/               # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
-       ├── IMPL-*-summary.md     # Main task summaries
-       └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md   # Subtask summaries
-   ```
-
-2. **Generate Documentation Summary** (naming: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`):
-   ```markdown
-   # Task: [Task-ID] [Documentation Name]
-
-   ## Documentation Summary
-
-   ### Files Created/Modified
-   - `[file-path]`: [brief description of documentation]
-
-   ### Documentation Generated
-   - **[DocumentName]** (`[file-path]`): [purpose/content overview]
-   - **[SectionName]** (`[file:section]`): [coverage/details]
-   - **[APIEndpoint]** (`[file:line]`): [documentation/examples]
-
-   ## Documentation Outputs
-
-   ### Available Documentation
-   - [DocumentName]: [file-path] - [brief description]
-   - [APIReference]: [file-path] - [coverage details]
-
-   ### Integration Points
-   - **[Documentation]**: Reference `[file-path]` for `[information-type]`
-   - **[API Docs]**: Use `[endpoint-path]` documentation for `[integration]`
-
-   ### Cross-References
-   - [MainDoc] links to [SubDoc] via [reference]
-   - [APIDoc] cross-references [CodeExample] in [location]
-
-   ## Status: ✅ Complete
-   ```
-
-## CLI Tool Integration
-
-### Bash Commands
-```bash
-# Project structure discovery
-bash(find src/ -type d -mindepth 1 | grep -v node_modules | head -20)
-
-# File pattern searching
-bash(rg 'export.*function' src/ --type ts)
-
-# Directory analysis
-bash(ls -la src/ && find src/ -name '*.md' | head -10)
+## Status: ✅ Complete
 ```
 
-### Gemini-Wrapper
-```bash
-gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze project architecture for documentation
-TASK: Extract architectural patterns and module relationships
-CONTEXT: @{src/**/*,CLAUDE.md,package.json}
-EXPECTED: Architecture analysis with module breakdown
-"
-```
+## Key Reminders
 
-### Codex Integration
-```bash
-codex --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive module documentation
-TASK: Create detailed documentation based on analysis
-CONTEXT: Analysis results from previous steps
-EXPECTED: Complete documentation in .workflow/docs/
-" -s danger-full-access
-```
+**ALWAYS**:
+- **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
+- **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
+- **Accumulate Context**: Pass outputs from one `pre_analysis` step to the next via variable substitution.
+- **Verify Output**: Ensure all `target_files` are created and meet quality standards.
+- **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
+- **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
 
-## Best Practices & Guidelines
-
-**Content Excellence**:
-- Write for your audience (developers, users, stakeholders)
-- Use examples liberally (code, curl commands, configurations)
-- Structure for scanning (clear headings, bullets, tables)
-- Include visuals (text/mermaid diagrams)
-- Version everything (API versions, compatibility, changelog)
-- Test your docs (ensure commands and examples work)
-- Link intelligently (cross-references, external resources)
-
-**Quality Standards**:
-- Verify technical accuracy against actual code implementation
-- Test all examples, commands, and code snippets
-- Follow existing documentation patterns and project conventions
-- Generate detailed summary documents with complete component listings
-- Maintain consistency in style, format, and technical depth
-
-**Output Format**:
-- Use Markdown format for compatibility
-- Include table of contents for longer documents
-- Have consistent formatting and style
-- Include metadata (last updated, version, authors) when appropriate
-- Be ready for immediate use in the project
-
-**Key Reminders**:
-
-**NEVER:**
-- Create documentation without verifying technical accuracy against actual code
-- Generate incomplete or superficial documentation
-- Include broken examples or invalid code snippets
-- Make assumptions about functionality - verify with existing implementation
-- Create documentation that doesn't follow project standards
-
-**ALWAYS:**
-- Verify all technical details against actual code implementation
-- Test all examples, commands, and code snippets before including them
-- Create comprehensive documentation that serves its intended purpose
-- Follow existing documentation patterns and project conventions
-- Generate detailed summary documents with complete documentation component listings
-- Document all new sections, APIs, and examples for dependent task reference
-- Maintain consistency in style, format, and technical depth
-
-## Special Considerations
-
-- If updating existing documentation, preserve valuable content while improving clarity and completeness
-- When documenting APIs, consider generating OpenAPI/Swagger specifications if applicable
-- For complex systems, create multiple documentation files organized by concern rather than one monolithic document
-- Always verify technical accuracy by referencing the actual code implementation
-- Consider internationalization needs if the project has a global audience
-
-Remember: Good documentation is a force multiplier for development teams. Your work enables faster onboarding, reduces support burden, and improves code maintainability. Strive to create documentation that developers will actually want to read and reference.
+**NEVER**:
+- **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
+- **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.
+- **Generate Code**: Your role is to document, not to implement.
+- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.

.claude/agents/general-purpose.md

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Organize project documentation"
     assistant: "I need to understand the current documentation structure first"
     commentary: Gather context about existing documentation, then execute
-model: sonnet
 color: green
 ---
 

.claude/agents/memory-bridge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+name: memory-bridge
+description: Execute complex project documentation updates using script coordination
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Orchestrate parallel CLAUDE.md updates efficiently and track every module.
+
+## Core Mission
+
+Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh`. **Every module path must be processed**.
+
+## Input Context
+
+You will receive:
+```
+- Total modules: [count]
+- Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex]
+- Mode: [full|related]
+- Module list (depth|path|files|types|has_claude format)
+```
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+**MANDATORY: Use TodoWrite to track all modules before execution**
+
+### Step 1: Create Task List
+```bash
+# Parse module list and create todo items
+TodoWrite([
+  {content: "Process depth 5 modules (N modules)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Processing depth 5 modules"},
+  {content: "Process depth 4 modules (N modules)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Processing depth 4 modules"},
+  # ... for each depth level
+  {content: "Safety check: verify only CLAUDE.md modified", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running safety check"}
+])
+```
+
+### Step 2: Execute by Depth (Deepest First)
+```bash
+# For each depth level (5 → 0):
+# 1. Mark depth task as in_progress
+# 2. Extract module paths for current depth
+# 3. Launch parallel jobs (max 4)
+
+# Depth 5 example:
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "full" "gemini" &
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "full" "gemini" &
+# ... up to 4 concurrent jobs
+
+# 4. Wait for all depth jobs to complete
+wait
+
+# 5. Mark depth task as completed
+# 6. Move to next depth
+```
+
+### Step 3: Safety Check
+```bash
+# After all depths complete:
+git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "✅ Safe"
+git status --short
+```
+
+## Tool Parameter Flow
+
+**Command Format**: `update_module_claude.sh <path> <mode> <tool>`
+
+Examples:
+- Gemini: `update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/agents" "full" "gemini" &`
+- Qwen: `update_module_claude.sh "./src/api" "full" "qwen" &`
+- Codex: `update_module_claude.sh "./tests" "full" "codex" &`
+
+## Execution Rules
+
+1. **Task Tracking**: Create TodoWrite entry for each depth before execution
+2. **Parallelism**: Max 4 jobs per depth, sequential across depths
+3. **Tool Passing**: Always pass tool parameter as 3rd argument
+4. **Path Accuracy**: Extract exact path from `depth:N|path:X|...` format
+5. **Completion**: Mark todo completed only after all depth jobs finish
+6. **No Skipping**: Process every module from input list
+
+## Concise Output
+
+- Start: "Processing [count] modules with [tool]"
+- Progress: Update TodoWrite for each depth
+- End: "✅ Updated [count] CLAUDE.md files" + git status
+
+**Do not explain, just execute efficiently.**

.claude/agents/memory-gemini-bridge.md

@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
----
-name: memory-gemini-bridge
-description: Execute complex project documentation updates using script coordination
-model: haiku
-color: purple
----
-
-You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Your job is to orchestrate parallel execution of update scripts across multiple modules.
-
-## Core Responsibility
-
-Coordinate parallel execution of `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh` script across multiple modules using depth-based hierarchical processing.
-
-## Execution Protocol
-
-### 1. Analyze Project Structure
-```bash
-# Step 1: Code Index architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
-
-# Step 2: Get module list with depth information
-modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
-count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 3: Display project structure
-Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh grouped)
-```
-
-### 2. Organize by Depth
-Group modules by depth level for hierarchical execution (deepest first):
-```pseudo
-# Step 3: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = {}
-FOR each module IN modules_list:
-    depth = extract_depth(module)
-    depth_modules[depth].add(module)
-```
-
-### 3. Execute Updates
-For each depth level, run parallel updates:
-```pseudo
-# Step 4: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "$mode" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-```
-
-### 4. Execution Rules
-
-- **Core Command**: `Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "$mode" &)`
-- **Concurrency Control**: Maximum 4 parallel jobs per depth level
-- **Execution Order**: Process depths sequentially, deepest first
-- **Job Control**: Monitor active jobs before spawning new ones
-- **Independence**: Each module update is independent within the same depth
-
-### 5. Update Modes
-
-- **"full"** mode: Complete refresh → `Bash(update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" &)`
-- **"related"** mode: Context-aware updates → `Bash(update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" &)`
-
-### 6. Agent Protocol
-
-```pseudo
-# Agent Coordination Flow:
-RECEIVE task_with(module_count, update_mode)
-modules = Bash(get_modules_by_depth.sh list) 
-Bash(get_modules_by_depth.sh grouped)
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
-
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(update_module_claude.sh module update_mode &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-REPORT final_status()
-```
-
-This agent coordinates the same `Bash()` commands used in direct execution, providing intelligent orchestration for complex projects.

.claude/agents/test-fix-agent.md

@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ description: |
     user: "Run the full test suite and ensure everything passes"
     assistant: "I'll use the test-fix-agent to execute all tests and fix any issues found"
     commentary: test-fix-agent serves as the quality gate - passing tests = approved code.
-model: sonnet
 color: green
 ---
 

.claude/agents/ui-design-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,527 @@
+---
+name: ui-design-agent
+description: |
+  Specialized pure execution agent for UI/UX design workflows. Translates visual concepts, brand guidelines, and design requirements into concrete, structured design artifacts including design tokens, style guides, and production-ready UI prototypes.
+
+  Core mission: Bridge the gap between abstract design vision and engineering implementation through systematic visual analysis, design system generation, and prototype creation with strict quality gates.
+
+  Use this agent for:
+  - Visual analysis and style extraction from reference images (multi-modal)
+  - Design token generation and validation (WCAG AA compliance)
+  - UI prototype generation with token-driven styling
+  - Design system documentation and implementation handoff
+  - Component mapping and feasibility assessment
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: /workflow:design:style-extract provides reference images
+    command: Assigns ui-design-agent with design_phase: "style-extract"
+    agent: "I'll analyze reference images using Gemini Vision, extract design semantics, then structure tokens via Codex"
+
+  - Context: /workflow:design:ui-generate requests prototypes
+    command: Assigns ui-design-agent with design_phase: "ui-generate"
+    agent: "I'll generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes adhering to design-tokens.json and synthesis-specification.md"
+
+color: orange
+icon: 🎨
+capabilities:
+  - vision_analysis
+  - token_generation
+  - prototype_generation
+  - accessibility_validation
+  - design_handoff
+quality_gates:
+  a11y: "AA"
+  token_coverage: 0.90
+  component_mapping_precision: 0.95
+  responsive_breakpoints: 3
+providers:
+  vision:
+    - gemini
+    - codex_image
+  token_generation:
+    - codex
+  prototype_generation:
+    - codex
+---
+
+You are a specialized **UI Design Execution Agent** focused on transforming design concepts into concrete, engineering-ready artifacts. Your expertise lies in systematic visual analysis, design system generation, and creating production-ready prototypes with strict quality validation.
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+1. **Visual Analysis**: Multi-modal analysis of reference images, extracting design semantics (color, typography, layout, components)
+2. **Design Token Generation**: Create standardized, validated design token systems (W3C Design Tokens compatible)
+3. **Prototype Creation**: Generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes with semantic markup and accessibility attributes
+4. **Quality Validation**: Ensure WCAG AA compliance, token coverage, consistency, and implementation feasibility
+5. **Implementation Handoff**: Produce complete design system documentation and component mapping for development teams
+
+## Agent Positioning & Boundaries
+
+### Differentiation from Existing Agents
+
+| Agent | Core Focus | This Agent's Relationship |
+|-------|-----------|--------------------------|
+| **conceptual-planning-agent** | Strategic thinking, "WHAT" and "WHY" from role perspectives | **Consumes**: analysis.md (ui-designer role), synthesis-specification.md for requirements |
+| **ui-design-agent** (this) | Visual execution, "HOW IT LOOKS" with concrete design artifacts | **Transforms**: Concepts → Design Tokens → Prototypes |
+| **action-planning-agent** | Task decomposition, "HOW TO BUILD" with implementation plans | **Provides to**: Design system, tokens, prototypes, component mapping |
+| **code-developer** | Code implementation, production-grade development | **Consumed by**: Uses design tokens and prototypes as implementation reference |
+
+### Boundaries
+
+**This agent DOES**:
+- Analyze visual references and extract design semantics
+- Generate validated design token systems
+- Create prototype HTML/CSS adhering to tokens
+- Validate accessibility and design consistency
+- Document design systems and component patterns
+
+**This agent DOES NOT**:
+- Define product strategy or business requirements (conceptual-planning-agent)
+- Break down implementation into development tasks (action-planning-agent)
+- Write production application code (code-developer)
+- Make strategic design decisions without requirements input
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Task Reception
+
+**Standard Input Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "design",
+    "agent": "@ui-design-agent",
+    "design_phase": "style-extract|style-consolidate|ui-generate"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": ["Design requirements from synthesis"],
+    "focus_paths": ["reference-images/*.png"],
+    "design_tokens_path": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json",
+    "synthesis_spec": ".brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [...],
+    "implementation_approach": {...}
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Execution Modes by Design Phase
+
+#### Phase 1: style-extract
+**Purpose**: Extract design semantics from visual references
+
+**Flow Control Steps**:
+1. **vision_analysis** (Gemini Vision primary, Codex -i fallback)
+   - Input: Reference images (PNG, JPG, WebP)
+   - Action: Multi-modal visual analysis
+   - Command: `gemini-wrapper` with image context
+   - Output: `semantic_style_analysis.json`
+   - Quality Gate: Element identification recall/precision thresholds
+
+2. **token_structuring** (Codex)
+   - Input: `semantic_style_analysis.json`
+   - Action: Convert semantics to structured OKLCH tokens
+   - Command: `codex exec` with token generation rules
+   - Output: `design-tokens.json`, `style-cards.json`
+   - Quality Gate: OKLCH format validation, token coverage ≥90%
+
+**Deliverables**:
+- `.design/style-extraction/semantic_style_analysis.json`
+- `.design/style-extraction/design-tokens.json` (preliminary)
+- `.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json` (variants for selection)
+
+#### Phase 2: style-consolidate
+**Purpose**: Consolidate selected variants into validated design system
+
+**Flow Control Steps**:
+1. **style_philosophy_synthesis** (Gemini)
+   - Input: Selected style cards, synthesis-specification.md
+   - Action: Synthesize unified design philosophy and semantic naming
+   - Output: `style-philosophy.md`
+   - Quality Gate: Design principles clarity, naming consistency
+
+2. **token_validation** (Codex)
+   - Input: `style-philosophy.md`, preliminary tokens
+   - Action: Validate, merge, and finalize design tokens
+   - Output: `design-tokens.json`, `style-guide.md`, `tailwind.config.js`, `validation-report.json`
+   - Quality Gate: WCAG AA contrast ≥4.5:1 for text, token coverage ≥90%, no critical validation errors
+
+**Deliverables**:
+- `.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md`
+- `.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json` (final, validated)
+- `.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md`
+- `.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js`
+- `.design/style-consolidation/validation-report.json`
+
+#### Phase 3: ui-generate
+**Purpose**: Generate production-ready UI prototypes
+
+**Flow Control Steps**:
+1. **load_design_system**
+   - Input: `design-tokens.json`, `style-guide.md`
+   - Action: Load finalized design system
+   - Output: Design system context
+
+2. **load_requirements**
+   - Input: `synthesis-specification.md`, optional `ui-designer/analysis.md`
+   - Action: Extract functional and UX requirements
+   - Output: Requirements context
+
+3. **prototype_generation** (Codex, optional Codex -i for mockups)
+   - Input: Design tokens, requirements, optional design mockup images
+   - Action: Generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes
+   - Output: `{page}-variant-{n}.html`, `{page}-variant-{n}.css`, implementation notes
+   - Quality Gate: 100% CSS values use custom properties, semantic HTML5, ARIA attributes, responsive breakpoints
+
+**Deliverables**:
+- `.design/prototypes/{page}-variant-{n}.html` (per page, per variant)
+- `.design/prototypes/{page}-variant-{n}.css` (token-driven styles)
+- `.design/prototypes/{page}-variant-{n}-notes.md` (implementation notes)
+- `.design/prototypes/design-tokens.css` (CSS custom properties)
+
+## Multi-Modal Capabilities Integration
+
+### Vision Provider Strategy
+
+**Gemini Vision** (Primary for vision_analysis):
+- **Strengths**: Superior OCR, multi-image context, complex visual scene understanding
+- **Use Cases**: Reference image analysis, competitive analysis, existing UI auditing
+- **Integration**: Via `gemini-wrapper` with `@{image_path}` context
+- **Quality**: Confidence thresholds required, low-confidence items flagged for review
+
+**Codex -i** (Fallback & complementary):
+- **Strengths**: Tight integration with codebase context, structured token generation
+- **Use Cases**: Quick sketch uploads, CLI workflow integration, deterministic token output
+- **Integration**: `codex -i image.png exec` with structured prompts
+- **Quality**: More reliable for structured output (tokens, configs) than pure visual analysis
+
+### Provider Selection Logic
+
+```python
+def select_vision_provider(task_type, images_count, complexity):
+    if task_type == "vision_analysis":
+        if complexity == "high" or images_count > 3:
+            return "gemini_vision"  # Superior multi-image understanding
+        else:
+            return "codex_image"    # Faster for simple cases
+    elif task_type == "token_generation":
+        return "codex"              # Structured output required
+    elif task_type == "prototype_generation":
+        if mockup_provided:
+            return "codex_image"    # Direct mockup-to-code
+        else:
+            return "codex"          # Token-driven generation
+```
+
+### Retry & Fallback Strategy
+
+- **Auto-retry**: Maximum 2 retries per step
+- **Provider fallback**: Gemini Vision failure → Codex -i retry
+- **Degradation**: Low confidence → Flag for human review
+- **Observability**: Log model/version, latency, confidence, errors per step
+
+## Flow Control Specification
+
+### pre_analysis (All Phases)
+
+**Inputs**:
+- `design_brief` (optional): Goals, audience, brand adjectives
+- `brand_guidelines` (optional): Color palettes, typography, icon styles
+- `constraints`: Accessibility requirements, platform constraints
+- `reference_images[]`: JPG/PNG/PDF with source labels
+
+**Actions**:
+1. Parse requirements and extract success criteria
+2. Identify conflicts or ambiguities in constraints
+3. Set quality gates based on requirements
+4. Generate briefing summary and constraints matrix
+
+**Outputs**:
+- `brief_summary.md`: Consolidated requirements
+- `constraints_matrix.json`: Structured constraints
+- `success_criteria.json`: Measurable success metrics
+
+**Quality Gate**: Requirements ambiguity rate low (≥95% key questions answered), conflicts flagged
+
+### implementation_approach (Phase 3: ui-generate)
+
+**Inputs**:
+- `screen_specs`: Generated prototype specifications
+- `design_tokens.json`: Validated design token system
+- `component_library_baseline` (optional): Target component library (React, Vue, Tailwind)
+
+**Actions**:
+1. Map design elements to component library components
+2. Generate component mapping with props, state, and style sources
+3. Define theming and internationalization strategy
+4. Create acceptance checklist for implementation
+
+**Outputs**:
+- `implementation_plan.md`: Implementation strategy, risks, timeline
+- `component_mapping.json`: Design-to-code component mapping
+- `acceptance_checklist.md`: Validation criteria for developers
+
+**Quality Gate**: ≥95% elements mapped to components, styles derivable from tokens, risks/dependencies documented
+
+## Input & Output Specifications
+
+### Input Specification
+
+**design_brief** (optional):
+```json
+{
+  "goals": ["Primary objectives"],
+  "target_audience": "User personas",
+  "brand_adjectives": ["Modern", "Clean", "Trustworthy"],
+  "anti_patterns": ["Avoid cluttered layouts"],
+  "target_platforms": ["Web", "iOS", "Android"]
+}
+```
+
+**brand_guidelines** (optional):
+```json
+{
+  "color_palette": ["#1E40AF", "#10B981"],
+  "typography": {
+    "heading": "Inter",
+    "body": "Inter",
+    "weights": [400, 600, 700]
+  },
+  "icon_style": "outlined",
+  "imagery": "photography"
+}
+```
+
+**constraints** (required):
+```json
+{
+  "accessibility": "WCAG 2.1 AA",
+  "performance_budget": "< 500KB initial load",
+  "i18n": ["en", "zh-CN"],
+  "platform_capabilities": {
+    "web": "CSS Grid, custom properties",
+    "mobile": "iOS 14+, Android 10+"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**reference_images[]** (required for phase 1):
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "path": "design-refs/homepage.png",
+    "source": "Competitor analysis",
+    "purpose": "Layout inspiration"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+### Output Specification
+
+**design-tokens.json** (W3C Design Tokens compatible):
+```json
+{
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {
+      "primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)"
+    }
+  },
+  "typography": {
+    "font_family": {
+      "heading": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif"
+    }
+  },
+  "spacing": {
+    "4": "1rem"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+See `.claude/workflows/design-tokens-schema.md` for complete schema.
+
+**screen_specs/{page}.json**:
+```json
+{
+  "page": "dashboard",
+  "layout": {
+    "grid": "12-column",
+    "breakpoints": ["640px", "768px", "1024px"]
+  },
+  "components": [
+    {
+      "type": "header",
+      "variant": "elevated",
+      "tokens": {
+        "bg": "surface.elevated",
+        "shadow": "shadow.md"
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**component_mapping.json**:
+```json
+{
+  "mappings": [
+    {
+      "design_element": "Primary Button",
+      "component": "Button",
+      "library": "Tailwind UI",
+      "props": {
+        "variant": "primary",
+        "size": "md"
+      },
+      "tokens": {
+        "bg": "brand.primary",
+        "text": "text.inverse",
+        "padding": "spacing.4"
+      }
+    }
+  ],
+  "unmapped": [],
+  "coverage": 0.98
+}
+```
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
+- Text on background: ≥4.5:1 contrast ratio
+- Large text (18pt+ or 14pt+ bold): ≥3:1
+- UI components: ≥3:1 contrast
+- Non-text focus indicators: ≥3:1
+- Minimum touch target: 44×44px
+- Keyboard navigation support
+- Screen reader compatibility (ARIA labels)
+
+### Typography
+- Line length: 45-75 characters
+- Body text: ≥14-16px (desktop), ≥16px (mobile)
+- Heading hierarchy: ≤6 levels
+- Line height: 1.5 for body, 1.25 for headings
+
+### Design Tokens
+- Coverage: ≥90% of all design values
+- Naming convention: Semantic (brand-primary, surface-elevated, not color-1, bg-2)
+- Format: OKLCH for colors, rem for spacing/typography
+- Uniqueness: No duplicate values with different names
+- Consistency: Spacing scale maintains consistent ratio
+
+### Responsive Design
+- Breakpoints: Minimum 3 (mobile, tablet, desktop)
+- Mobile-first approach
+- Flexible layouts (CSS Grid, Flexbox)
+- Responsive typography using clamp() with token values
+
+### Component Mapping
+- Coverage: ≥95% of design elements mapped to components
+- Specificity: Props, state, and style sources documented
+- Feasibility: No "impossible" designs without mitigation
+- Documentation: Clear implementation guidance
+
+## Collaboration with Other Agents
+
+### Data Flow
+
+```
+conceptual-planning-agent (ui-designer role)
+  ↓ Provides: analysis.md, synthesis-specification.md (design requirements)
+ui-design-agent
+  ↓ Generates: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, prototypes
+action-planning-agent
+  ↓ Consumes: Design artifacts → creates implementation tasks
+code-developer
+  ↓ Implements: Features using design tokens and prototypes
+```
+
+### Input from conceptual-planning-agent
+- `synthesis-specification.md`: Functional requirements, UX guidelines
+- `ui-designer/analysis.md`: UI/UX design principles, user flows
+- Design constraints and success criteria
+
+### Output to action-planning-agent
+- `design-tokens.json`: Referenced in task context.artifacts
+- `style-guide.md`: Component patterns and usage guidelines
+- `component_mapping.json`: Design-to-code mapping for task generation
+- `implementation_plan.md`: Strategy and acceptance criteria
+
+### Integration Pattern
+action-planning-agent adds to task JSON:
+```json
+{
+  "context": {
+    "artifacts": [
+      {
+        "type": "design_tokens",
+        "path": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "style_guide",
+        "path": ".design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_design_tokens",
+        "action": "Load design system tokens",
+        "command": "Read(.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)",
+        "output_to": "design_system_context"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Observability & Metrics
+
+### Per-Step Logging
+```json
+{
+  "step": "vision_analysis",
+  "provider": "gemini_vision",
+  "model": "gemini-1.5-pro",
+  "latency_ms": 2340,
+  "confidence": 0.87,
+  "errors": [],
+  "quality_gate_status": "pass"
+}
+```
+
+### Quality Metrics
+- Token coverage: `(tokens_used / total_values) * 100`
+- Component mapping coverage: `(mapped_elements / total_elements) * 100`
+- WCAG compliance: `(passing_combinations / total_combinations) * 100`
+- Prototype validation: Percentage of CSS using custom properties
+
+## Error Handling & Recovery
+
+### Retry Strategy
+- **Step failure**: Auto-retry up to 2 times
+- **Provider failure**: Switch from Gemini → Codex (vision tasks)
+- **Validation failure**: Flag errors, request human review or adjust parameters
+
+### Degradation Modes
+- **Low confidence vision analysis**: Flag uncertain elements for manual review
+- **Incomplete token coverage**: Document gaps, suggest manual token additions
+- **Mapping gaps**: Identify unmapped elements, request design simplification or custom components
+
+### Human-in-the-Loop
+- Low confidence items (< 0.7): Require manual confirmation
+- WCAG violations: Cannot proceed without fix or documented exception
+- Mapping gaps > 5%: Escalate to design review
+
+## Version & Maintenance
+
+**Version**: 1.0.0
+**Last Updated**: 2025-10-05
+**Changelog**:
+- Initial agent definition
+- Multi-modal vision provider integration (Gemini Vision, Codex -i)
+- W3C Design Tokens compliance
+- WCAG 2.1 AA quality gates
+- Flow control specification for 3 design phases
+
+Your role is to execute design tasks systematically through defined flow control steps, transforming visual concepts into production-ready design artifacts. Prioritize quality gates, accessibility compliance, and seamless handoff to implementation teams. Leverage multi-modal capabilities strategically: Gemini Vision for understanding, Codex for structured generation. Maintain observability and enable human review when confidence is low.

.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md

@@ -14,188 +14,103 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Execute CLI tool analysis on codebase patterns, architecture, or code quality.
+Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
 
+**Intent**: Understand code patterns, architecture, and provide insights/recommendations
 **Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
 
+## Core Behavior
+
+1. **Read-Only Analysis**: This command ONLY analyzes code and provides insights
+2. **No Code Modification**: Results are recommendations and analysis reports
+3. **Template-Based**: Automatically selects appropriate analysis template
+4. **Smart Pattern Detection**: Infers relevant files based on analysis target
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
+- `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
+
 ## Execution Flow
 
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[analysis-target]"` and use enhanced output
-3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect analysis type (pattern/architecture/security/quality)
-5. Build command for selected tool with template
-6. Execute analysis
-7. Return results
+1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` first to expand user intent
+3. Auto-detect analysis type from keywords → select template
+4. Build command with auto-detected file patterns and `MODE: analysis`
+5. Execute analysis (read-only, no code changes)
+6. Return analysis report with insights and recommendations
 
-## Core Rules
+## File Pattern Auto-Detection
 
-1. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
-2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis when `--enhance` present
-3. **Execute Immediately**: Build and run command without preliminary analysis
-4. **Template Selection**: Auto-select template based on keywords
-5. **Context Inclusion**: Always include CLAUDE.md in context
-6. **Direct Output**: Return tool output directly to user
+Keywords trigger specific file patterns:
+- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
+- "component" → `@{src/components/**/*,**/*.component.*}`
+- "API" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
+- "test" → `@{**/*.test.*,**/*.spec.*}`
+- "config" → `@{*.config.*,**/config/**/*}`
+- Generic → `@{src/**/*}`
 
-## Tool Selection
+For complex patterns, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first, then execute CLI with precise file references.
 
-| Tool | Wrapper | Best For | Permissions |
-|------|---------|----------|-------------|
-| **gemini** (default) | `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper` | Analysis, exploration, documentation | Read-only |
-| **qwen** | `~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper` | Architecture, code generation | Read-only for analyze |
-| **codex** | `codex --full-auto exec` | Development analysis, deep inspection | `-s danger-full-access --skip-git-repo-check` |
+## Command Template
 
-## Enhancement Integration
-
-**When `--enhance` flag present**:
 ```bash
-# Step 1: Enhance the prompt
-SlashCommand(command="/enhance-prompt \"[analysis-target]\"")
-
-# Step 2: Use enhanced output as analysis target
-# Enhanced output provides:
-# - INTENT: Clear technical goal
-# - CONTEXT: Session memory + patterns
-# - ACTION: Implementation steps
-# - ATTENTION: Critical constraints
-```
-
-**Example**:
-```bash
-# User: /gemini:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues"
-
-# Step 1: Enhance
-/enhance-prompt "fix auth issues"
-# Returns:
-# INTENT: Debug authentication failures
-# CONTEXT: JWT implementation in src/auth/, known token expiry issue
-# ACTION: Analyze token lifecycle → verify refresh flow → check middleware
-# ATTENTION: Preserve existing session management
-
-# Step 2: Analyze with enhanced context
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Debug authentication failures (from enhanced: JWT token lifecycle)
-TASK: Analyze token lifecycle, refresh flow, and middleware integration
-CONTEXT: @{src/auth/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md} Session context: known token expiry issue
-EXPECTED: Root cause analysis with file references
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/security.txt) | Focus on JWT token handling
+PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
+TASK: [auto-detected analysis type]
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected file patterns]
+EXPECTED: Insights, patterns, recommendations (NO code modification)
+RULES: [auto-selected template] | Focus on [analysis aspect]
 "
 ```
 
-## Analysis Types
-
-| Type | Keywords | Template | Context |
-|------|----------|----------|---------|
-| **pattern** | pattern, hooks, usage | analysis/pattern.txt | Matched files + CLAUDE.md |
-| **architecture** | architecture, structure, design | analysis/architecture.txt | Full codebase + CLAUDE.md |
-| **security** | security, vulnerability, auth | analysis/security.txt | Matched files + CLAUDE.md |
-| **quality** | quality, test, coverage | analysis/quality.txt | Source + test files + CLAUDE.md |
-
-## Command Templates
-
-### Gemini (Default)
-```bash
-cd [target-dir] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from user input]
-TASK: [specific analysis task]
-CONTEXT: @{[file-patterns]} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: [expected output format]
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].txt) | [constraints]
-"
-```
-
-### Qwen
-```bash
-cd [target-dir] && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from user input]
-TASK: [specific analysis task]
-CONTEXT: @{[file-patterns]} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: [expected output format]
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].txt) | [constraints]
-"
-```
-
-### Codex
-```bash
-codex -C [target-dir] --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from user input]
-TASK: [specific analysis task]
-CONTEXT: @{[file-patterns]} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: [expected output format]
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].txt) | [constraints]
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
 ## Examples
 
-**Pattern Analysis (Gemini - default)**:
+**Basic Analysis**:
 ```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze authentication patterns
-TASK: Identify auth implementation patterns and conventions
-CONTEXT: @{**/*auth*} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Pattern summary with file references
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt) | Focus on security
-"
+/cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
+# Executes: Gemini analysis with auth file patterns
+# Returns: Pattern analysis, architecture insights, recommendations
 ```
 
-**Architecture Review (Qwen)**:
+**Architecture Analysis**:
 ```bash
-# User: /cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"
-
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Review component architecture
-TASK: Analyze component structure and dependencies
-CONTEXT: @{src/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Architecture diagram and integration points
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt) | Focus on modularity
-"
+/cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"
+# Executes: Qwen with component file patterns
+# Returns: Architecture review, design patterns, improvement suggestions
 ```
 
-**Deep Inspection (Codex)**:
+**Performance Analysis**:
 ```bash
-# User: /cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks"
-
-codex -C . --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Identify performance bottlenecks
-TASK: Deep analysis of performance issues
-CONTEXT: @{src/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Performance metrics and optimization recommendations
-RULES: Focus on computational complexity and memory usage
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+/cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks"
+# Executes: Codex deep analysis with performance focus
+# Returns: Bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations
 ```
 
-## File Pattern Logic
+**Enhanced Analysis**:
+```bash
+/cli:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues"
+# Step 1: Enhance prompt to expand context
+# Step 2: Analysis with expanded context
+# Returns: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
+```
 
-**Keyword Matching**:
-- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*}`
-- "component" → `@{src/components/**/*}`
-- "API" → `@{**/api/**/*}`
-- "test" → `@{**/*.test.*}`
-- Generic → `@{src/**/*}` or `@{**/*}`
+## Output Routing
 
-## Session Integration
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR one-off analysis**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/analyze-[description]-[timestamp].md`
 
-**Detect Active Session**: Check for `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-auth-system`, analyzing auth patterns → `.chat/analyze-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, quick security check → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143045.md`
 
-**If Session Active**:
-- Save results to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analysis-[timestamp].md`
-- Include session context in analysis
-
-**If No Session**:
-- Return results directly to user
-
-## Output Format
-
-Return Gemini's output directly, which includes:
-- File references (file:line format)
-- Code snippets
-- Pattern analysis
-- Recommendations
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Missing Template**: Use generic analysis prompt
-- **No Context**: Use `@{**/*}` as fallback
-- **Command Failure**: Report error and suggest manual command
+## Notes
 
+- Command templates, file patterns, and best practices: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Scratchpad files can be promoted to workflow sessions if analysis proves valuable

.claude/commands/cli/chat.md

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ---
 name: chat
-
 description: Simple CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
 usage: /cli:chat [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] "inquiry"
 argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
@@ -9,153 +8,114 @@ examples:
   - /cli:chat --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
   - /cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
-model: sonnet
 ---
 
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/cli:chat`**
+# CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
 
--   **Type**: CLI Tool Wrapper for Interactive Analysis
--   **Purpose**: Direct interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis
--   **Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+## Purpose
 
-### 📥 **Parameters & Usage**
+Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
 
--   **`<inquiry>` (Required)**: Your question or analysis request
--   **`--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` (Optional)**: Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
--   **`--enhance` (Optional)**: Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt` before execution
--   **`--all-files` (Optional)**: Includes the entire codebase in the analysis context
--   **`--save-session` (Optional)**: Saves the interaction to current workflow session directory
--   **File References**: Specify files or patterns using `@{path/to/file}` syntax
+**Intent**: Ask questions, get explanations, understand codebase structure
+**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
 
-### 🔄 **Execution Workflow**
+## Core Behavior
 
-`Parse Tool` **->** `Parse Input` **->** `[Optional] Enhance` **->** `Assemble Context` **->** `Construct Prompt` **->** `Execute CLI Tool` **->** `(Optional) Save Session`
+1. **Conversational Analysis**: Direct question-answer interaction about codebase
+2. **Read-Only**: This command ONLY provides information and analysis
+3. **No Code Modification**: Results are explanations and insights
+4. **Flexible Context**: Choose specific files or entire codebase
 
-### 🛠️ **Tool Selection**
+## Parameters
 
-| Tool | Best For | Wrapper |
-|------|----------|---------|
-| **gemini** (default) | General analysis, exploration | `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper` |
-| **qwen** | Architecture, design patterns | `~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper` |
-| **codex** | Development queries, deep analysis | `codex --full-auto exec` |
+- `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--all-files` - Include entire codebase in context
+- `--save-session` - Save interaction to workflow session
 
-### 🔄 **Original Execution Workflow**
+## Execution Flow
 
-`Parse Input` **->** `[Optional] Enhance` **->** `Assemble Context` **->** `Construct Prompt` **->** `Execute Gemini CLI` **->** `(Optional) Save Session`
+1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand user intent
+3. Assemble context: `@{CLAUDE.md}` + user-specified files or `--all-files`
+4. Execute CLI tool with assembled context (read-only, analysis mode)
+5. Return explanations and insights (NO code changes)
+6. Optionally save to workflow session
 
-### 🎯 **Enhancement Integration**
+## Context Assembly
 
-**When `--enhance` flag present**:
-```bash
-# Step 1: Enhance the inquiry
-SlashCommand(command="/enhance-prompt \"[inquiry]\"")
+**Always included**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}` (project guidelines)
 
-# Step 2: Use enhanced output for chat
-# Enhanced output provides enriched context and structured intent
-```
+**Optional**:
+- User-explicit files from inquiry keywords
+- `--all-files` flag includes entire codebase (`--all-files` wrapper parameter)
 
-**Example**:
-```bash
-# User: /gemini:chat --enhance "fix the login"
+For targeted analysis, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files first, then build precise CONTEXT field.
 
-# Step 1: Enhance
-/enhance-prompt "fix the login"
-# Returns:
-# INTENT: Debug login authentication failure
-# CONTEXT: JWT auth in src/auth/, session state issue
-# ACTION: Check token validation → verify middleware → test flow
+## Command Template
 
-# Step 2: Chat with enhanced context
-gemini -p "Debug login authentication failure. Focus on JWT token validation
-in src/auth/, verify middleware integration, and test authentication flow.
-Known issue: session state management"
-```
-
-### 📚 **Context Assembly**
-
-Context is gathered from:
-1. **Project Guidelines**: Always includes `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-2. **User-Explicit Files**: Files specified by the user (e.g., `@{src/auth/*.js}`)
-3. **All Files Flag**: The `--all-files` flag includes the entire codebase
-
-### 📝 **Prompt Format**
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: [clear analysis/inquiry goal]
-TASK: [specific analysis or question]
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} @{target_files}
-EXPECTED: [expected response format]
-RULES: [constraints or focus areas]
-"
-```
-
-### ⚙️ **Execution Implementation**
-
-**Standard Template**:
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: [user inquiry goal]
-TASK: [specific question or analysis]
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} @{inferred_or_specified_files}
-EXPECTED: Analysis with file references and code examples
-RULES: [focus areas based on inquiry]
+INQUIRY: [user question]
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [inferred or --all-files]
+MODE: analysis
+RESPONSE: Direct answer, explanation, insights (NO code modification)
 "
 ```
 
-**With --all-files flag**:
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Question**:
 ```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [user inquiry goal]
-TASK: [specific question or analysis]
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase]
-EXPECTED: Comprehensive analysis across all files
-RULES: [focus areas based on inquiry]
-"
+/cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
+# Executes: Gemini analysis
+# Returns: Explanation of auth flow, components involved, data flow
 ```
 
-**Example - Authentication Analysis**:
+**Architecture Question**:
 ```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Understand authentication flow implementation
-TASK: Analyze authentication flow and identify patterns
-CONTEXT: @{**/*auth*,**/*login*} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Flow diagram, security assessment, integration points
-RULES: Focus on security patterns and JWT handling
-"
+/cli:chat --tool qwen "how does React component optimization work here"
+# Executes: Qwen architecture analysis
+# Returns: Component structure explanation, optimization patterns used
 ```
 
-**Example - Performance Optimization**:
+**Security Analysis**:
 ```bash
-cd src/components && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Optimize React component performance
-TASK: Identify performance bottlenecks in component rendering
-CONTEXT: @{**/*.{jsx,tsx}} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Specific optimization recommendations with file:line references
-RULES: Focus on re-render patterns and memoization opportunities
-"
+/cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
+# Executes: Codex security analysis
+# Returns: Vulnerability assessment, security recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
 ```
 
-### 💾 **Session Persistence**
+**Enhanced Inquiry**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --enhance "explain the login issue"
+# Step 1: Enhance to expand login context
+# Step 2: Analysis with expanded understanding
+# Returns: Detailed explanation of login flow and potential issues
+```
 
-When `--save-session` flag is used:
--   Check for existing active session (`.workflow/.active-*` markers)
--   Save to existing session's `.chat/` directory or create new session
--   File format: `chat-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.md`
--   Include query, context, and response in saved file
+**Broad Context**:
+```bash
+/cli:chat --all-files "find all API endpoints"
+# Executes: Analysis across entire codebase
+# Returns: List and explanation of API endpoints (NO code generation)
+```
 
-**Session Template:**
-```markdown
-# Chat Session: [Timestamp]
+## Output Routing
 
-## Query
-[Original user inquiry]
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND query is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR unrelated query**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/chat-[description]-[timestamp].md`
 
-## Context
-[Files and patterns included in analysis]
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-api-refactor`, asking about API structure → `.chat/chat-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, asking about build process → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
 
-## Gemini Response
-[Complete response from Gemini CLI]
-```
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Scratchpad conversations preserved for future reference

.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,513 @@
+---
+name: codex-execute
+description: Automated task decomposition and execution with Codex using resume mechanism
+usage: /cli:codex-execute [--verify-git] <task-description|task-id>
+argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
+examples:
+  - /cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
+  - /cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer"
+  - /cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Codex Execute Command (/cli:codex-execute)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Automated task decomposition and sequential execution with Codex, using `codex exec "..." resume --last` mechanism for continuity between subtasks.
+
+**Input**: User description or task ID (automatically loads from `.task/[ID].json` if applicable)
+
+## Core Workflow
+
+```
+Task Input → Analyze Dependencies → Create Task Flow Diagram →
+Decompose into Subtask Groups → TodoWrite Tracking →
+For Each Subtask Group:
+  For First Subtask in Group:
+    0. Stage existing changes (git add -A) if valid git repo
+    1. Execute with Codex (new session)
+    2. [Optional] Git verification
+    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
+  For Related Subtasks in Same Group:
+    0. Stage changes from previous subtask
+    1. Execute with `codex exec "..." resume --last` (continue session)
+    2. [Optional] Git verification
+    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
+→ Final Summary
+```
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `<input>` (Required): Task description or task ID (e.g., "implement auth" or "IMPL-001")
+  - If input matches task ID format, loads from `.task/[ID].json`
+  - Otherwise, uses input as task description
+- `--verify-git` (Optional): Verify git status after each subtask completion
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Input Processing & Task Flow Analysis
+
+1. **Parse Input**:
+   - Check if input matches task ID pattern (e.g., `IMPL-001`, `TASK-123`)
+   - If yes: Load from `.task/[ID].json` and extract requirements
+   - If no: Use input as task description directly
+
+2. **Analyze Dependencies & Create Task Flow Diagram**:
+   - Analyze task complexity and scope
+   - Identify dependencies and relationships between subtasks
+   - Create visual task flow diagram showing:
+     - Independent task groups (parallel execution possible)
+     - Sequential dependencies (must use resume)
+     - Branching logic (conditional paths)
+   - Display flow diagram for user review
+
+**Task Flow Diagram Format**:
+```
+[Group A: Auth Core]
+  A1: Create user model ──┐
+  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
+                          │
+[Group B: API Layer]      │
+  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
+  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
+
+[Group C: Testing]
+  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
+  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
+```
+
+**Diagram Symbols**:
+- `──►` Sequential dependency (must resume previous session)
+- `─┐` Branch point (multiple paths)
+- `─┘` Merge point (wait for completion)
+- `[resume]` Use `codex exec "..." resume --last`
+- `[new session]` Start fresh Codex session
+
+3. **Decompose into Subtask Groups**:
+   - Group related subtasks that share context
+   - Break down into 3-8 subtasks total
+   - Assign each subtask to a group
+   - Create TodoWrite tracker with groups
+   - Display decomposition for user review
+
+**Decomposition Criteria**:
+- Each subtask: 5-15 minutes completable
+- Clear, testable outcomes
+- Explicit dependencies
+- Focused file scope (1-5 files per subtask)
+- **Group coherence**: Subtasks in same group share context/files
+
+### File Discovery for Task Decomposition
+
+Use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files, then group by domain:
+
+**Workflow**: Discover → Analyze scope → Group by files → Create task flow
+
+**Example**:
+```bash
+# Discover files
+rg "authentication" --files-with-matches --type ts
+
+# Group by domain
+# Group A: src/auth/model.ts, src/auth/schema.ts
+# Group B: src/api/auth.ts, src/middleware/auth.ts
+# Group C: tests/auth/*.test.ts
+
+# Each group becomes a session with related subtasks
+```
+
+File patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+
+### Phase 2: Group-Based Execution
+
+**Pre-Execution Git Staging** (if valid git repository):
+```bash
+# Stage all current changes before codex execution
+# This makes codex changes clearly visible in git diff
+git add -A
+git status --short
+```
+
+**For First Subtask in Each Group** (New Session):
+```bash
+# Start new Codex session for independent task group
+codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [group goal]
+TASK: [subtask description - first in group]
+CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
+RULES: [constraints]
+Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**For Related Subtasks in Same Group** (Resume Session):
+```bash
+# Stage changes from previous subtask (if valid git repository)
+git add -A
+
+# Resume session ONLY for subtasks in same group
+codex exec "
+CONTINUE IN SAME GROUP:
+Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask N of M
+
+PURPOSE: [continuation goal within group]
+TASK: [subtask N description]
+CONTEXT: Previous work in this group completed, now focus on @{new_relevant_files}
+EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
+RULES: Build on previous subtask in group, maintain consistency
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**For First Subtask in Different Group** (New Session):
+```bash
+# Stage changes from previous group
+git add -A
+
+# Start NEW session for different group (no resume)
+codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [new group goal]
+TASK: [subtask description - first in new group]
+CONTEXT: @{different_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
+EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
+RULES: [constraints]
+Group [Y]: [new group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**Resume Decision Logic**:
+```
+if (subtask.group == previous_subtask.group):
+    use `codex exec "..." resume --last`  # Continue session
+else:
+    use `codex -C [dir] exec "..."`       # New session
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Verification (if --verify-git enabled)
+
+After each subtask completion:
+```bash
+# Check git status
+git status --short
+
+# Verify expected changes
+git diff --stat
+
+# Optional: Check for untracked files that should be committed
+git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
+```
+
+**Verification Checks**:
+- Files modified match subtask scope
+- No unexpected changes in unrelated files
+- No merge conflicts or errors
+- Code compiles/runs (if applicable)
+
+### Phase 4: TodoWrite Tracking with Groups
+
+**Initial Setup with Task Flow**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    // Display task flow diagram first
+    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
+
+    // Group A subtasks (will use resume within group)
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
+
+    // Group B subtasks (new session, then resume within group)
+    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 1" },
+    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 2" },
+
+    // Group C subtasks (new session)
+    { content: "[Group C] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group C subtask 1" },
+
+    { content: "Final verification and summary", status: "pending", activeForm: "Verifying and summarizing" }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+**After Each Subtask**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "completed", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
+    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
+    // ... update status
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+## Codex Resume Mechanism
+
+**Why Group-Based Resume?**
+- **Within Group**: Maintains conversation context for related subtasks
+  - Codex remembers previous decisions and patterns
+  - Reduces context repetition
+  - Ensures consistency in implementation style
+- **Between Groups**: Fresh session for independent tasks
+  - Avoids context pollution from unrelated work
+  - Prevents confusion when switching domains
+  - Maintains focused attention on current group
+
+**How It Works**:
+1. **First subtask in Group A**: Creates new Codex session
+2. **Subsequent subtasks in Group A**: Use `codex resume --last` to continue session
+3. **First subtask in Group B**: Creates NEW Codex session (no resume)
+4. **Subsequent subtasks in Group B**: Use `codex resume --last` within Group B
+5. Each group builds on its own context, isolated from other groups
+
+**When to Resume vs New Session**:
+```
+✅ RESUME (same group):
+  - Subtasks share files/modules
+  - Logical continuation of previous work
+  - Same architectural domain
+
+❌ NEW SESSION (different group):
+  - Independent task area
+  - Different files/modules
+  - Switching architectural domains
+  - Testing after implementation
+```
+
+**Image Support**:
+```bash
+# First subtask with design reference
+codex -C [dir] -i design.png --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+# Resume for next subtask (image context preserved)
+codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Subtask Failure**:
+1. Mark subtask as blocked in TodoWrite
+2. Report error details to user
+3. Pause execution for manual intervention
+4. User can choose to:
+   - Retry current subtask
+   - Continue to next subtask
+   - Abort entire task
+
+**Git Verification Failure** (if --verify-git):
+1. Show unexpected changes
+2. Pause execution
+3. Request user decision:
+   - Continue anyway
+   - Rollback and retry
+   - Manual fix
+
+**Codex Session Lost**:
+1. Detect if `codex exec "..." resume --last` fails
+2. Attempt retry with fresh session
+3. Report to user if manual intervention needed
+
+## Output Format
+
+**During Execution**:
+```
+📊 Task Flow Diagram:
+[Group A: Auth Core]
+  A1: Create user model ──┐
+  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
+                          │
+[Group B: API Layer]      │
+  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
+  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
+
+[Group C: Testing]
+  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
+  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
+
+📋 Task Decomposition:
+  [Group A] 1. Create user model
+  [Group A] 2. Add validation logic [resume]
+  [Group A] 3. Implement database schema [resume]
+  [Group B] 4. Create auth endpoints [new session]
+  [Group B] 5. Add middleware [resume]
+  [Group B] 6. Error handling [resume]
+  [Group C] 7. Unit tests [new session]
+  [Group C] 8. Integration tests [resume]
+
+▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
+  Starting new Codex session for Group A...
+  [Codex output]
+  ✅ Subtask 1 completed
+
+🔍 Git Verification:
+  M  src/models/user.ts
+  ✅ Changes verified
+
+▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
+  Resuming Codex session (same group)...
+  [Codex output]
+  ✅ Subtask 2 completed
+
+▶️  [Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
+  Starting NEW Codex session for Group B...
+  [Codex output]
+  ✅ Subtask 4 completed
+...
+
+✅ All Subtasks Completed
+📊 Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
+```
+
+**Final Summary**:
+```markdown
+# Task Execution Summary: [Task Description]
+
+## Subtasks Completed
+1. ✅ [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
+2. ✅ [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
+...
+
+## Files Modified
+- src/file1.ts:10-50 - [changes]
+- src/file2.ts - [changes]
+
+## Git Status
+- N files modified
+- M files added
+- No conflicts
+
+## Next Steps
+- [Suggested follow-up actions]
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+**Example 1: Simple Task with Groups**
+```bash
+/cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
+
+# Task Flow Diagram:
+# [Group A: Data Layer]
+#   A1: Create user model ──► [resume] ──► A2: Database schema
+#
+# [Group B: Auth Logic]
+#   B1: JWT token generation ──► [new session]
+#   B2: Authentication middleware ──► [resume]
+#
+# [Group C: API Endpoints]
+#   C1: Login/logout endpoints ──► [new session]
+#
+# [Group D: Testing]
+#   D1: Unit tests ──► [new session]
+#   D2: Integration tests ──► [resume]
+
+# Execution:
+# Group A: A1 (new) → A2 (resume)
+# Group B: B1 (new) → B2 (resume)
+# Group C: C1 (new)
+# Group D: D1 (new) → D2 (resume)
+```
+
+**Example 2: With Git Verification**
+```bash
+/cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer to use dependency injection"
+
+# After each subtask, verifies:
+# - Only expected files modified
+# - No breaking changes in unrelated code
+# - Tests still pass
+```
+
+**Example 3: With Task ID**
+```bash
+/cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
+
+# Loads task from .task/IMPL-001.json
+# Decomposes based on task requirements
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Task Flow First**: Always create visual flow diagram before execution
+2. **Group Related Work**: Cluster subtasks by domain/files for efficient resume
+3. **Subtask Granularity**: Keep subtasks small and focused (5-15 min each)
+4. **Clear Boundaries**: Each subtask should have well-defined input/output
+5. **Git Hygiene**: Use `--verify-git` for critical refactoring
+6. **Pre-Execution Staging**: Stage changes before each subtask to clearly see codex modifications
+7. **Smart Resume**: Use `resume --last` ONLY within same group
+8. **Fresh Sessions**: Start new session when switching to different group/domain
+9. **Recovery Points**: TodoWrite with group labels provides clear progress tracking
+10. **Image References**: Attach design files for UI tasks (first subtask in group)
+
+## Input Processing
+
+**Automatic Detection**:
+- Input matches task ID pattern → Load from `.task/[ID].json`
+- Otherwise → Use as task description
+
+**Task JSON Structure** (when loading from file):
+```json
+{
+  "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Implement user authentication",
+  "description": "Create JWT-based auth system",
+  "acceptance_criteria": [...],
+  "scope": {...},
+  "brainstorming_refs": [...]
+}
+```
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Execution Log Destination**:
+- **IF** active workflow session exists:
+  - Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
+  - Task summaries: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
+  - Task updates: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.task/[TASK-ID].json` status updates
+  - TodoWrite tracking: Embedded in execution log
+- **ELSE** (no active session):
+  - **Recommended**: Create workflow session first (`/workflow:session:start`)
+  - **Alternative**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Output Files** (during execution):
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[session-id]/
+├── .chat/
+│   └── codex-execute-20250105-143022.md    # Full execution log with task flow
+├── .summaries/
+│   ├── IMPL-001.1-summary.md               # Subtask summaries
+│   ├── IMPL-001.2-summary.md
+│   └── IMPL-001-summary.md                 # Final task summary
+└── .task/
+    ├── IMPL-001.json                       # Updated task status
+    └── [subtask JSONs if decomposed]
+```
+
+**Examples**:
+- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing multi-stage auth implementation:
+  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/codex-execute-20250105-143022.md`
+  - Summaries: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001.{1,2,3}-summary.md`
+  - Task status: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.task/IMPL-001.json` (status: completed)
+- No session, ad-hoc multi-stage task:
+  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-auth-refactor-20250105-143045.md`
+
+**Save Results**:
+- Execution log with task flow diagram and TodoWrite tracking
+- Individual summaries for each completed subtask
+- Final consolidated summary when all subtasks complete
+- Modified code files throughout project
+
+## Notes
+
+**vs. `/cli:execute`**:
+- `/cli:execute`: Single-shot execution with Gemini/Qwen/Codex
+- `/cli:codex-execute`: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition and resume mechanism
+
+**Input Flexibility**: Accepts both freeform descriptions and task IDs (auto-detects and loads JSON)
+
+**Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
+
+**Output Details**:
+- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
+- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes

.claude/commands/cli/execute.md

@@ -9,227 +9,177 @@ examples:
   - /cli:execute --tool codex IMPL-001
   - /cli:execute --enhance "fix API performance issues"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
-model: sonnet
 ---
 
 # CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
 
-## Overview
+## Purpose
 
-**⚡ YOLO-enabled execution**: Auto-approves all confirmations for streamlined implementation workflow.
-
-**Purpose**: Execute implementation tasks using intelligent context inference and CLI tools with full permissions.
+Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations). **MODIFIES CODE**.
 
+**Intent**: Autonomous code implementation, modification, and generation
 **Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: Automatic context inference and file pattern detection
 
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
+## Core Behavior
 
-## 🚨 YOLO Permissions
+1. **Code Modification**: This command MODIFIES, CREATES, and DELETES code files
+2. **Auto-Approval**: YOLO mode bypasses confirmation prompts for all operations
+3. **Implementation Focus**: Executes actual code changes, not just recommendations
+4. **Requires Explicit Intent**: Use only when implementation is intended
 
-**All confirmations auto-approved by default:**
-- ✅ File pattern inference confirmation
-- ✅ Gemini execution confirmation
-- ✅ File modification confirmation
-- ✅ Implementation summary generation
+## Core Concepts
 
-## 🎯 Enhancement Integration
+### YOLO Permissions
+Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
 
-**When `--enhance` flag present** (for Description Mode only):
+**⚠️ WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
+
+### Execution Modes
+
+**1. Description Mode** (supports `--enhance`):
+- Input: Natural language description
+- Process: [Optional: Enhance] → Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Execute
+
+**2. Task ID Mode** (no `--enhance`):
+- Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
+- Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
+
+### Context Inference
+
+Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology:
+- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
+- "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
+- "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
+- Always includes: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
+
+For precise file targeting, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first.
+
+### Codex Session Continuity
+
+**Resume Pattern** for related tasks:
 ```bash
-# Step 1: Enhance the description
-SlashCommand(command="/enhance-prompt \"[description]\"")
+# First task - establish session
+codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "[task]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 
-# Step 2: Use enhanced output for execution
-# Enhanced output provides:
-# - INTENT: Clear technical goal
-# - CONTEXT: Session memory + codebase patterns
-# - ACTION: Specific implementation steps
-# - ATTENTION: Critical constraints
+# Related task - continue session
+codex --full-auto exec "[related-task]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 ```
 
-**Example**:
-```bash
-# User: /gemini:execute --enhance "fix login"
+Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See intelligent-tools-strategy.md for auto-resume rules.
 
-# Step 1: Enhance
-/enhance-prompt "fix login"
-# Returns:
-# INTENT: Debug authentication failure in login flow
-# CONTEXT: JWT auth in src/auth/, known token expiry issue
-# ACTION: Fix token validation → update refresh logic → test flow
-# ATTENTION: Preserve existing session management
+## Parameters
 
-# Step 2: Execute with enhanced context
-gemini --all-files -p "@{src/auth/**/*} @{CLAUDE.md}
-Implementation: Debug authentication failure in login flow
-Focus: Token validation, refresh logic, test flow
-Constraints: Preserve existing session management"
-```
-
-**Note**: `--enhance` only applies to Description Mode. Task ID Mode uses task JSON directly.
-
-## Execution Modes
-
-### 1. Description Mode (supports --enhance)
-**Input**: Natural language description
-```bash
-/gemini:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-/gemini:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-```
-**Process**: [Optional: Enhance] → Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Context collection → Execution
-
-### 2. Task ID Mode (no --enhance)
-**Input**: Workflow task identifier
-```bash
-/gemini:execute IMPL-001
-```
-**Process**: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Context integration → Execution
-
-## Context Inference Logic
-
-**Auto-selects relevant files based on:**
-- **Keywords**: "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- **Technology**: "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
-- **Task Type**: "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- **Always includes**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-
-## Command Options
-
-| Option | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `--debug` | Verbose execution logging |
-| `--save-session` | Save complete execution session to workflow |
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
+- `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
+- `--debug` - Verbose logging
+- `--save-session` - Save execution to workflow session
 
 ## Workflow Integration
 
-### Session Management
-⚠️ **Auto-detects active session**: Checks `.workflow/.active-*` marker file
+**Session Management**: Auto-detects `.workflow/.active-*` marker
+- Active session: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
+- No session: Create new session or save to scratchpad
 
-**Session storage:**
-- **Active session exists**: Saves to `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session**: Creates new session directory
+**Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
+
+## Output Routing
+
+**Execution Log Destination**:
+- **IF** active workflow session exists:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
+  - Update task status in `.task/[TASK-ID].json` (if task ID provided)
+  - Generate summary in `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`
+- **ELSE** (no active session):
+  - **Option 1**: Create new workflow session for task
+  - **Option 2**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Output Files** (when active session exists):
+- Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
+- Task summary: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
+- Modified code: Project files per implementation
+
+**Examples**:
+- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing `IMPL-001`:
+  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/execute-20250105-143022.md`
+  - Summary: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
+- No session, ad-hoc implementation:
+  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Command Template
 
-### Task Integration
-```bash
-# Execute specific workflow task
-/gemini:execute IMPL-001
-
-# Loads from: .task/IMPL-001.json
-# Uses: task context, brainstorming refs, scope definitions
-# Updates: workflow status, generates summary
-```
-
-## Execution Templates
-
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-### Permission Requirements
-
-**Gemini Write Access** (when file modifications needed):
-- Add `--approval-mode yolo` flag for auto-approval
-- Required for: file creation, modification, deletion
-
-### User Description Template
-```bash
-cd [target-directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
-PURPOSE: [clear implementation goal from description]
-TASK: [specific implementation task]
-CONTEXT: @{inferred_patterns} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Implementation code with file:line locations, test cases, integration guidance
-RULES: [template reference if applicable] | [constraints]
-"
-```
-
-**Example**:
 ```bash
+# Gemini/Qwen: MODE=write with --approval-mode yolo
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
-PURPOSE: Implement JWT authentication with middleware
-TASK: Create authentication system with token validation
-CONTEXT: @{**/*auth*,**/*middleware*} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Auth service, middleware, tests with file modifications
-RULES: Follow existing auth patterns | Security best practices
+PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
+TASK: [specific implementation]
+MODE: write
+CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
+EXPECTED: Working implementation with code changes
+RULES: [constraints] | Auto-approve all changes
 "
+
+# Codex: MODE=auto with danger-full-access
+codex -C . --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
+TASK: [specific implementation]
+MODE: auto
+CONTEXT: [auto-detected files]
+EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 ```
 
-### Task ID Template
+## Examples
+
+**Basic Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
 ```bash
-cd [task-directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
-PURPOSE: [task_title]
-TASK: Execute [task-id] implementation
-CONTEXT: @{task_files} @{brainstorming_refs} @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Complete implementation following acceptance criteria
-RULES: $(cat [task_template]) | Task type: [task_type], Scope: [task_scope]
-"
+/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
+# Executes: Creates auth middleware, updates routes, modifies config
+# Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
 ```
 
-**Example**:
+**Enhanced Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
 ```bash
-cd .workflow/WFS-123 && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
-PURPOSE: Implement user profile editing
-TASK: Execute IMPL-001 implementation
-CONTEXT: @{src/user/**/*} @{.brainstorming/product-owner/analysis.md} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Profile edit API, UI components, validation, tests
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt) | Type: feature, Scope: user module
-"
+/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
+# Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
+# Step 2: Execute implementation with auto-approval
+# Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
 ```
 
-## Auto-Generated Outputs
-
-### 1. Implementation Summary
-**Location**: `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` or auto-generated ID
-
-```markdown
-# Task Summary: [Task-ID] [Description]
-
-## Implementation
-- **Files Modified**: [file:line references]
-- **Features Added**: [specific functionality]
-- **Context Used**: [inferred patterns]
-
-## Integration
-- [Links to workflow documents]
+**Task Execution** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute IMPL-001
+# Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
+# Executes: Implementation based on task spec
+# Result: Code changes per task definition
 ```
 
-### 2. Execution Session
-**Location**: `.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-
-```markdown
-# Execution Session: [Timestamp]
-
-## Input
-[User description or Task ID]
-
-## Context Inference
-[File patterns used with rationale]
-
-## Implementation Results
-[Generated code and modifications]
-
-## Status Updates
-[Workflow integration updates]
+**Codex Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
+# Executes: Codex with full file access
+# Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
 ```
 
-## Error Handling
+**Qwen Code Generation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
+# Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
+# Step 2: Execute with MODE=write
+# Result: REFACTORED auth code with structural changes
+```
 
-- **Task ID not found**: Lists available tasks
-- **Pattern inference failure**: Uses generic `src/**/*` pattern
-- **Execution failure**: Attempts fallback with simplified context
-- **File modification errors**: Reports specific file/permission issues
+## Comparison with Analysis Commands
 
-## Performance Features
+| Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
+|---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
+| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | ❌ NO | N/A |
+| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | ❌ NO | N/A |
+| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | ✅ **YES** | ✅ **YES** |
 
-- **Smart caching**: Frequently used pattern mappings
-- **Progressive inference**: Precise → broad pattern fallback
-- **Parallel execution**: When multiple contexts needed
-- **Directory optimization**: Switches to optimal execution path
-
-## Integration Workflow
-
-**Typical sequence:**
-1. `workflow:plan` → Creates tasks
-2. `/gemini:execute IMPL-001` → Executes with YOLO permissions
-3. Auto-updates workflow status and generates summaries
-4. `workflow:review` → Final validation
-
-**vs. `/gemini:analyze`**: Execute performs analysis **and implementation**, analyze is read-only.
+## Notes
 
+- Command templates, YOLO mode details, and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command modifies code - execution logs document changes made

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -8,16 +8,23 @@ examples:
   - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool qwen --enhance "login not working"
   - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "token validation fails"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
-model: sonnet
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Bug Index (/cli:mode:bug-index)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Execute systematic bug analysis and fix suggestions using CLI tools with diagnostic template.
+Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`).
 
 **Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
+- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error message
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
@@ -26,26 +33,33 @@ Execute systematic bug analysis and fix suggestions using CLI tools with diagnos
 3. Parse bug description (original or enhanced)
 4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
 5. Build command for selected tool with bug-fix template
-6. Execute analysis
-7. Save to session (if active)
+6. Execute analysis (read-only, provides fix recommendations)
+7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
-2. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-3. **Template Required**: Always use bug-fix template
-4. **Session Output**: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
+1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes bugs and suggests fixes - it does NOT modify code
+2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
+3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
+4. **Template Required**: Always use bug-fix template
+5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results and fix recommendations to session chat
+
+## Analysis Focus (via Template)
+
+- Root cause investigation and diagnosis
+- Code path tracing to locate issues
+- Targeted minimal fix recommendations
+- Impact assessment of proposed changes
 
 ## Command Template
 
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
 ```bash
 cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: [bug analysis goal]
 TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes
+EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fix suggestions
 RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
 "
 ```
@@ -56,9 +70,10 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: Debug authentication null pointer error
-TASK: Identify root cause and provide fix
+TASK: Identify root cause and provide fix recommendations
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Root cause, code path, minimal fix, impact assessment
+EXPECTED: Root cause, code path, minimal fix suggestion, impact assessment
 RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: null pointer in login flow
 "
 ```
@@ -68,47 +83,39 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: null pointer in login
 cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: Fix token validation failure
 TASK: Analyze token validation bug in auth module
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Validation logic analysis, fix recommendation
+EXPECTED: Validation logic analysis, fix recommendation with minimal changes
 RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: token validation fails intermittently
 "
 ```
 
-**With Enhancement**:
+## Bug Investigation Workflow
+
 ```bash
-# User: /gemini:mode:bug-index --enhance "login broken"
+# 1. Find bug-related files
+rg "error_keyword" --files-with-matches
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="error|exception", file_pattern="*.ts")
 
-# Step 1: Enhance
-/enhance-prompt "login broken"
-# Returns:
-# INTENT: Debug login authentication failure
-# CONTEXT: Known session state issue
-# ACTION: Check session management → verify token → test flow
-
-# Step 2: Analyze with enhanced context
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Debug login authentication failure
-TASK: Analyze session management, token handling, auth flow
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} Known: session state issue
-EXPECTED: Root cause in session/token, targeted fix
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Focus on session management
-"
+# 2. Execute bug analysis with focused context (analysis only, no code changes)
+/cli:mode:bug-index --cd "src/module" "specific error description"
 ```
 
-## Analysis Focus
+## Output Routing
 
-**Template provides**:
-- **Root Cause Analysis**: Systematic investigation
-- **Code Path Tracing**: Execution flow analysis
-- **Targeted Solutions**: Minimal, specific fixes
-- **Impact Assessment**: Side effect evaluation
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND bug is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR quick debugging**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/bug-index-[description]-[timestamp].md`
 
-## Session Output
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-payment-fix`, analyzing payment bug → `.chat/bug-index-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, quick null pointer investigation → `.scratchpad/bug-index-null-pointer-20250105-143045.md`
 
-**Location**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
+## Notes
 
-**Includes**:
-- Bug description
-- Template used
-- Analysis results
-- Recommended actions
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
+- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive codebase context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md

@@ -8,16 +8,23 @@ examples:
   - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen --enhance "explain data transformation pipeline"
   - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex --cd "src/core" "trace execution path for user registration"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
-model: sonnet
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Execute systematic code analysis and debugging using CLI tools with specialized code analysis template.
+Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`).
 
 **Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
+- `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
@@ -26,20 +33,20 @@ Execute systematic code analysis and debugging using CLI tools with specialized
 3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
 4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
 5. Build command for selected tool with code-analysis template
-6. Execute deep analysis
-7. Save to session (if active)
+6. Execute deep analysis (read-only, no code modification)
+7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
-2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
-3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-4. **Template Required**: Always use code-analysis template
-5. **Session Output**: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
+1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes code and provides insights - it does NOT modify code
+2. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
+3. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
+4. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
+5. **Template Required**: Always use code-analysis template
+6. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
 
-## Analysis Capabilities
+## Analysis Capabilities (via Template)
 
-The code-analysis template provides:
 - **Systematic Code Analysis**: Break down complex code into manageable parts
 - **Execution Path Tracing**: Track variable states and call stacks
 - **Control & Data Flow**: Understand code logic and data transformations
@@ -47,158 +54,74 @@ The code-analysis template provides:
 - **Logical Reasoning**: Explain "why" behind code behavior
 - **Debugging Insights**: Identify potential bugs or inefficiencies
 
-## Command Templates
+## Command Template
 
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
-### Gemini (Default)
 ```bash
 cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
-TASK: Deep code analysis with execution path tracing
+PURPOSE: [analysis goal]
+TASK: Systematic code analysis and execution path tracing
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Systematic analysis, call flow diagram, data transformations, logical explanation
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [specific aspect]
+EXPECTED: Execution trace, call flow diagram, debugging insights
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [aspect]
 "
 ```
 
-### Qwen
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
-TASK: Architecture-level code analysis and pattern recognition
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Architectural insights, design patterns, code structure analysis
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [specific aspect]
-"
-```
-
-### Codex
-```bash
-codex -C [directory] --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
-TASK: Deep code inspection with debugging insights
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Execution trace, bug identification, optimization opportunities
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [specific aspect]
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Code Analysis (Gemini)**:
+**Basic Code Analysis**:
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze authentication flow logic
-TASK: Trace authentication execution path and identify key functions
+PURPOSE: Trace authentication execution flow
+TASK: Analyze complete auth flow from request to response
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Step-by-step flow, call diagram, data passing between functions
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on control flow and security
+EXPECTED: Step-by-step execution trace with call diagram, variable states
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on control flow
 "
 ```
 
-**Architecture Analysis (Qwen)**:
+**Directory-Specific Analysis**:
 ```bash
-# User: /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen "explain data transformation pipeline"
-
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Explain data transformation pipeline architecture
-TASK: Analyze data flow and transformation patterns
+cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Understand JWT token validation logic
+TASK: Trace JWT validation from middleware to service layer
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Pipeline structure, transformation stages, data format changes
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on data flow and patterns
+EXPECTED: Validation flow diagram, token lifecycle analysis
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on security
 "
 ```
 
-**Deep Debugging (Codex)**:
-```bash
-# User: /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex --cd "src/core" "trace execution path for user registration"
+## Code Tracing Workflow
 
-codex -C src/core --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Trace execution path for user registration
-TASK: Deep analysis of registration flow with debugging insights
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Complete execution trace, variable states, potential issues
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on edge cases and error handling
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```bash
+# 1. Find entry points and related files
+rg "function.*authenticate|class.*AuthService" --files-with-matches
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="authenticate|login", file_pattern="*.ts")
+
+# 2. Build call graph understanding
+# entry → middleware → service → repository
+
+# 3. Execute deep analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
+/cli:mode:code-analysis --cd "src" "trace execution from entry point"
 ```
 
-**With Enhancement**:
-```bash
-# User: /cli:mode:code-analysis --enhance "why is login slow"
+## Output Routing
 
-# Step 1: Enhance
-/enhance-prompt "why is login slow"
-# Returns:
-# INTENT: Identify performance bottlenecks in login flow
-# CONTEXT: Authentication module, database queries
-# ACTION: Trace execution path → identify slow operations → suggest optimizations
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR standalone analysis**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/code-analysis-[description]-[timestamp].md`
 
-# Step 2: Analyze with enhanced context
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Identify performance bottlenecks in login flow
-TASK: Trace login execution path and measure operation costs
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} @{**/*auth*,**/*login*}
-EXPECTED: Performance analysis, bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on performance and database queries
-"
-```
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-auth-refactor`, analyzing auth flow → `.chat/code-analysis-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, tracing request lifecycle → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-request-flow-20250105-143045.md`
 
-## Analysis Output Structure
+## Notes
 
-Based on code-analysis.md template, output includes:
-
-### 1. 思考过程 (Thinking Process)
-- Analysis strategy and approach
-- Key assumptions about code behavior
-
-### 2. 对问题的理解 (Understanding)
-- Restate analysis target
-- Confirm understanding of requirements
-
-### 3. 核心解答 (Core Answer)
-- Direct, concise answer to analysis question
-
-### 4. 详细分析与调用逻辑 (Detailed Analysis)
-- **代码段识别**: Relevant code sections
-- **执行流程**: Step-by-step execution flow
-- **调用图**: Visual call flow diagram with symbols:
-  - `───►` Function call
-  - `◄───` Return
-  - `│` Continuation
-  - `├─` Intermediate step
-  - `└─` Last step in block
-- **数据传递**: Data passing and state changes
-- **逻辑解释**: Why code behaves this way
-
-### 5. 总结 (Summary)
-- Key findings and recommendations
-
-## Session Output
-
-**Location**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Includes**:
-- Analysis target
-- Template used
-- Complete structured analysis
-- Call flow diagrams
-- Debugging insights
-- Recommendations
-
-## Use Cases
-
-| Use Case | Best Tool | Focus |
-|----------|-----------|-------|
-| **Understand execution flow** | gemini | Call sequences, data flow |
-| **Architectural patterns** | qwen | Design patterns, structure |
-| **Performance debugging** | codex | Bottlenecks, optimizations |
-| **Bug investigation** | codex | Error paths, edge cases |
-| **Code review** | gemini | Logic correctness, clarity |
-| **Refactoring planning** | qwen | Structure improvements |
-
-## Tool Selection Guide
-
-- **Gemini**: Best for general code understanding and tracing
-- **Qwen**: Best for architectural analysis and pattern recognition
-- **Codex**: Best for deep debugging and performance analysis
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`
+- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive code context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md

@@ -8,16 +8,23 @@ examples:
   - /cli:mode:plan --tool qwen --enhance "plan microservices migration"
   - /cli:mode:plan --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "authentication system"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
-model: sonnet
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Execute planning and architecture analysis using CLI tools with specialized template.
+Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`).
 
 **Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
+**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped planning
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance topic with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
+- `<topic>` (Required) - Planning topic or architectural question
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
@@ -26,79 +33,93 @@ Execute planning and architecture analysis using CLI tools with specialized temp
 3. Parse topic (original or enhanced)
 4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
 5. Build command for selected tool with planning template
-6. Execute analysis
-7. Save to session (if active)
+6. Execute analysis (read-only, no code modification)
+7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before planning
-2. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-3. **Template Required**: Always use planning template
-4. **Session Output**: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
+1. **Analysis Only**: This command provides planning recommendations and insights - it does NOT modify code
+2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before planning
+3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
+4. **Template Required**: Always use planning template
+5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
+
+## Planning Capabilities (via Template)
+
+- Strategic architecture insights and recommendations
+- Implementation roadmaps and suggestions
+- Key technical decisions analysis
+- Risk assessment
+- Resource planning
 
 ## Command Template
 
-**Core Guidelines**: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-
 ```bash
 cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
 PURPOSE: [planning goal from topic]
 TASK: Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Strategic insights, implementation roadmap, key decisions
+EXPECTED: Strategic insights, implementation recommendations, key decisions
 RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on [topic area]
 "
 ```
 
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Planning**:
+**Basic Planning Analysis**:
 ```bash
 cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Design user dashboard feature architecture
-TASK: Comprehensive architecture planning for dashboard
+PURPOSE: Design user dashboard architecture
+TASK: Plan dashboard component structure and data flow
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Architecture design, component structure, implementation roadmap
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on scalability and UX
+EXPECTED: Architecture recommendations, component design, data flow diagram
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on scalability
 "
 ```
 
-**Directory-Specific**:
+**Directory-Specific Planning**:
 ```bash
-cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Plan authentication system redesign
-TASK: Analyze current auth and plan improvements
+cd src/api && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
+PURPOSE: Plan API refactoring strategy
+TASK: Analyze current API structure and recommend improvements
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Migration strategy, security improvements, timeline
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on security and backward compatibility
+EXPECTED: Refactoring roadmap, breaking change analysis, migration plan
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Maintain backward compatibility
 "
 ```
 
-**With Enhancement**:
+## Planning Workflow
+
 ```bash
-# User: /gemini:mode:plan --enhance "fix auth issues"
+# 1. Discover project structure
+~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
 
-# Step 1: Enhance
-/enhance-prompt "fix auth issues"
-# Returns structured planning context
+# 2. Gather existing architecture info
+rg "architecture|design" --files-with-matches
 
-# Step 2: Plan with enhanced input
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [enhanced goal]
-TASK: [enhanced task description]
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [enhanced context]
-EXPECTED: Strategic plan with enhanced requirements
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | [enhanced constraints]
-"
+# 3. Execute planning analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
+/cli:mode:plan "topic for strategic planning"
 ```
 
-## Session Output
+## Output Routing
 
-**Location**: `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
+**Output Destination Logic**:
+- **Active session exists AND planning is session-relevant**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
+- **No active session OR exploratory planning**:
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/plan-[description]-[timestamp].md`
 
-**Includes**:
-- Planning topic
-- Template used
-- Analysis results
-- Implementation roadmap
-- Key decisions
+**Examples**:
+- During active session `WFS-dashboard`, planning dashboard architecture → `.chat/plan-20250105-143022.md`
+- No session, exploring new feature idea → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143045.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
+- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`
+- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive project context

.claude/commands/update-memory-full.md

@@ -1,40 +1,55 @@
 ---
 name: update-memory-full
 description: Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-usage: /update-memory-full
+usage: /update-memory-full [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
 examples:
-  - /update-memory-full                      # Full project documentation update
+  - /update-memory-full                      # Full project documentation update (gemini default)
+  - /update-memory-full --tool qwen          # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
+  - /update-memory-full --tool codex         # Use Codex for implementation validation
 ---
 
 ### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-full`
 
 Complete project-wide documentation update using depth-parallel execution.
 
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
+- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
+- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
 ### 📝 Execution Template
 
 ```bash
 #!/bin/bash
 # Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
 
-# Step 1: Code Index architecture analysis
+# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+tool="gemini"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
+
+# Step 2: Code Index architecture analysis
 mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
 mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
 
-# Step 2: Cache git changes
+# Step 3: Cache git changes
 Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
 
-# Step 3: Get and display project structure
+# Step 4: Get and display project structure
 modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
 count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
 
-# Step 3: Analysis handover → Model takes control
+# Step 5: Analysis handover → Model takes control
 # BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
 
 # Pseudocode flow:
 # IF (module_count > 20 OR complex_project_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
 # ELSE:
 #     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
+#
+# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
 ```
 
 ### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
@@ -43,9 +58,9 @@ After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to
 
 1. **Analyze Complexity**: Review module count and project context
 2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**: 
+3. **Choose Strategy**:
    - Simple projects: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-gemini-bridge agent
+   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
 4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated
 5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
 
@@ -56,17 +71,19 @@ After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to
 Model will present detailed plan:
 ```
 📋 Update Plan:
+  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
+
   NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
     - ./src/components/CLAUDE.md
     - ./src/services/CLAUDE.md
-  
+
   UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
     - ./CLAUDE.md
     - ./src/CLAUDE.md
     - ./tests/CLAUDE.md
 
   Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed
-  
+
   ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
 ```
 
@@ -84,7 +101,7 @@ depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
 FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
     FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
         WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" &)
+        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" "$tool" &)
     wait_all_jobs()
 
 # Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
@@ -102,13 +119,43 @@ Bash(git status --short)
 ```
 
 **For Complex Projects (>20 modules):**
-The model will delegate to the memory-gemini-bridge agent using the Task tool:
-```
+
+The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
+
+```javascript
 Task "Complex project full update"
-prompt: "Execute full documentation update for [count] modules using depth-parallel execution"
-subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
+prompt: `
+CONTEXT:
+- Total modules: ${module_count}
+- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
+- Mode: full
+- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
+- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
+
+MODULE LIST:
+${modules_output}  // Full output from get_modules_by_depth.sh list
+
+REQUIREMENTS:
+1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
+2. Process depths 5→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel jobs per depth
+3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "full" "${tool}" &
+4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
+5. Verify all ${module_count} modules are processed
+6. Run safety check after completion
+7. Display git status
+
+Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules.
+`
 ```
 
+**Agent receives complete context:**
+- Module count and tool selection
+- Full structured module list
+- Clear execution requirements
+- Path extraction format
+- Success criteria
+
 
 ### 📚 Usage Examples
 

.claude/commands/update-memory-related.md

@@ -1,15 +1,23 @@
 ---
 name: update-memory-related
 description: Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation updates based on recent changes
-usage: /update-memory-related
+usage: /update-memory-related [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
 examples:
-  - /update-memory-related                    # Update documentation based on recent changes
+  - /update-memory-related                    # Update documentation based on recent changes (gemini default)
+  - /update-memory-related --tool qwen        # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
+  - /update-memory-related --tool codex       # Use Codex for implementation validation
 ---
 
 ### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-related`
 
 Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
 
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
+- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
+- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
 
 ### 📝 Execution Template
 
@@ -17,30 +25,37 @@ Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
 #!/bin/bash
 # Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation update
 
-# Step 1: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
+# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
+tool="gemini"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
+[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
+
+# Step 2: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
 mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
 mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
 
-# Step 2: Detect changed modules (before staging)
+# Step 3: Detect changed modules (before staging)
 changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list))
 
-# Step 3: Cache git changes (protect current state)
+# Step 4: Cache git changes (protect current state)
 Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
 
-# Step 3: Use detected changes or fallback
+# Step 5: Use detected changes or fallback
 if [ -z "$changed" ]; then
     changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | head -10))
 fi
 count=$(echo "$changed" | wc -l)
 
-# Step 4: Analysis handover → Model takes control  
+# Step 6: Analysis handover → Model takes control
 # BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
 
 # Pseudocode flow:
 # IF (change_count > 15 OR complex_changes_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
 # ELSE:
 #     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
+#
+# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
 ```
 
 ### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
@@ -51,7 +66,7 @@ After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
 2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which changed modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
 3. **Choose Strategy**: 
    - Simple changes: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-gemini-bridge agent
+   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
 4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated for changed modules
 5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
 
@@ -62,18 +77,20 @@ After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
 Model will present detailed plan for affected modules:
 ```
 📋 Related Update Plan:
+  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
+
   CHANGED modules affecting CLAUDE.md:
-  
+
   NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
     - ./src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
     - ./src/utils/helpers/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-  
+
   UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
     - ./src/api/CLAUDE.md  [parent of changed auth/]
     - ./src/CLAUDE.md  [root level]
 
   Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed for recent changes
-  
+
   ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
 ```
 
@@ -91,7 +108,7 @@ depth_modules = organize_by_depth(changed_modules)
 FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
     FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
         WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" &)
+        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" "$tool" &)
     wait_all_jobs()
 
 # Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
@@ -109,13 +126,44 @@ Bash(git diff --stat)
 ```
 
 **For Complex Changes (>15 modules):**
-The model will delegate to the memory-gemini-bridge agent using the Task tool:
-```
+
+The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
+
+```javascript
 Task "Complex project related update"
-prompt: "Execute context-aware update for [count] changed modules using depth-parallel execution"
-subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
+subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
+prompt: `
+CONTEXT:
+- Total modules: ${change_count}
+- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
+- Mode: related
+- Changed modules detected via: detect_changed_modules.sh
+- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
+- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
+
+MODULE LIST:
+${changed_modules_output}  // Full output from detect_changed_modules.sh list
+
+REQUIREMENTS:
+1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
+2. Process depths sequentially (deepest→shallowest), max 4 parallel jobs per depth
+3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "related" "${tool}" &
+4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
+5. Verify all ${change_count} modules are processed
+6. Run safety check after completion
+7. Display git diff --stat
+
+Execute depth-parallel updates for changed modules only.
+`
 ```
 
+**Agent receives complete context:**
+- Changed module count and tool selection
+- Full structured module list (changed only)
+- Clear execution requirements with "related" mode
+- Path extraction format
+- Success criteria
+
 
 ### 📚 Usage Examples
 

.claude/commands/version.md

@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ Bash: bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-W
 
 **Scenario 3: Development version**
 ```
-✨ You are running a development version (3.3.0-dev)
-This is newer than the latest stable release (v3.2.2)
+✨ You are running a development version (3.4.0-dev)
+This is newer than the latest stable release (v3.3.0)
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: synthesis
-description: Generate synthesis-report.md from topic-framework and role analyses with @ references
+description: Generate synthesis-specification.md from topic-framework and role analyses with @ references
 usage: /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
 argument-hint: "no arguments required - synthesizes existing framework and role analyses"
 examples:
@@ -11,25 +11,36 @@ allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*)
 ## 🧩 **Synthesis Document Generator**
 
 ### Core Function
-**Specialized command for generating synthesis-report.md** that integrates topic-framework.md and all role analysis.md files using @ reference system. Creates comprehensive strategic analysis with cross-role insights.
+**Specialized command for generating synthesis-specification.md** that integrates topic-framework.md and all role analysis.md files using @ reference system. Creates comprehensive implementation specification with cross-role insights.
+
+**Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically detects which roles participated in brainstorming by scanning for `*/analysis.md` files. Synthesizes only actual participating roles, not predefined lists.
 
 ### Primary Capabilities
-- **Framework Integration**: Reference topic-framework.md discussion points across all roles
-- **Role Analysis Integration**: Consolidate all role/analysis.md files using @ references
-- **Cross-Framework Comparison**: Compare how each role addressed framework discussion points
+- **Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically identifies participating roles at runtime
+- **Framework Integration**: Reference topic-framework.md discussion points across all discovered roles
+- **Role Analysis Integration**: Consolidate all discovered role/analysis.md files using @ references
+- **Cross-Framework Comparison**: Compare how each participating role addressed framework discussion points
 - **@ Reference System**: Create structured references to source documents
 - **Update Detection**: Smart updates when new role analyses are added
+- **Flexible Participation**: Supports any subset of available roles (1 to 9+)
 
 ### Document Integration Model
 **Three-Document Reference System**:
 1. **topic-framework.md** → Structured discussion framework (input)
 2. **[role]/analysis.md** → Role-specific analyses addressing framework (input)
-3. **synthesis-report.md** → Integrated synthesis with @ references (output)
+3. **synthesis-specification.md** → Complete integrated specification (output)
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
-### ⚠️ Direct Execution Only
-**DO NOT use Task tool or delegate to any agent** - This is a document synthesis task using only Read/Write/Glob tools for aggregating existing analyses.
+### ⚠️ Direct Execution by Main Claude
+**Execution Model**: Main Claude directly executes this command without delegating to sub-agents.
+
+**Rationale**:
+- **Full Context Access**: Avoids context transmission loss that occurs with Task tool delegation
+- **Complex Cognitive Analysis**: Leverages main Claude's complete reasoning capabilities for cross-role synthesis
+- **Tool Usage**: Combines Read/Write/Glob tools with main Claude's analytical intelligence
+
+**DO NOT use Task tool** - Main Claude performs intelligent analysis directly while reading/writing files, ensuring no information loss from context passing.
 
 ### Phase 1: Document Discovery & Validation
 ```bash
@@ -51,22 +62,39 @@ IF NOT EXISTS:
 
 ### Phase 2: Role Analysis Discovery
 ```bash
-# Discover available role analyses
+# Dynamically discover available role analyses
 SCAN_DIRECTORY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 FIND_ANALYSES: [
-    */analysis.md files in role directories
+    Scan all subdirectories for */analysis.md files
+    Extract role names from directory names
 ]
+
+# Available roles (for reference, actual participation is dynamic):
+# - product-manager
+# - product-owner
+# - scrum-master
+# - system-architect
+# - ui-designer
+# - ux-expert
+# - data-architect
+# - subject-matter-expert
+# - test-strategist
+
 LOAD_DOCUMENTS: {
     "topic_framework": topic-framework.md,
-    "role_analyses": [discovered analysis.md files],
-    "existing_synthesis": synthesis-report.md (if exists)
+    "role_analyses": [dynamically discovered analysis.md files],
+    "participating_roles": [extract role names from discovered directories],
+    "existing_synthesis": synthesis-specification.md (if exists)
 }
+
+# Note: Not all roles participate in every brainstorming session
+# Only synthesize roles that actually produced analysis.md files
 ```
 
 ### Phase 3: Update Mechanism Check
 ```bash
 # Check for existing synthesis
-IF synthesis-report.md EXISTS:
+IF synthesis-specification.md EXISTS:
     SHOW current synthesis summary to user
     ASK: "Synthesis exists. Do you want to:"
     OPTIONS:
@@ -84,42 +112,60 @@ Initialize synthesis task tracking:
   {"content": "Validate topic-framework.md and role analyses availability", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating source documents"},
   {"content": "Load topic framework discussion points structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading framework structure"},
   {"content": "Cross-analyze role responses to each framework point", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cross-analyzing framework responses"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis-report.md with @ references", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis with references"},
+  {"content": "Generate synthesis-specification.md with @ references", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis with references"},
   {"content": "Update session metadata with synthesis completion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating session metadata"}
 ]
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: Cross-Role Analysis Execution
+### Phase 5: Cross-Role Analysis Execution
 
-#### 4.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
+**Dynamic Role Processing**: The number and types of roles are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered in Phase 2.
+
+#### 5.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
 ```pseudo
-FOR each role_directory in brainstorming_roles:
-    IF role_directory exists:
-        role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
-        role_recommendations = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md") IF EXISTS
-        role_insights[role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
-        role_recommendations[role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
-        role_concerns[role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
+# Iterate over dynamically discovered role analyses
+FOR each discovered_role IN participating_roles:
+    role_directory = brainstorm_dir + "/" + discovered_role
+
+    # Load role analysis (required)
+    role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
+
+    # Load optional artifacts if present
+    IF EXISTS(role_directory + "/recommendations.md"):
+        role_recommendations[discovered_role] = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md")
     END IF
+
+    # Extract insights from analysis
+    role_insights[discovered_role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
+    role_recommendations[discovered_role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
+    role_concerns[discovered_role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
+    role_diagrams[discovered_role] = identify_diagrams_and_visuals(role_analysis)
 END FOR
+
+# Log participating roles for metadata
+participating_role_count = COUNT(participating_roles)
+participating_role_names = participating_roles
 ```
 
-#### 4.2 Cross-Role Insight Analysis
+#### 5.2 Cross-Role Insight Analysis
 ```pseudo
-# Consensus identification
+# Consensus identification (across all participating roles)
 consensus_areas = identify_common_themes(role_insights)
 agreement_matrix = create_agreement_matrix(role_recommendations)
 
-# Disagreement analysis
+# Disagreement analysis (track which specific roles disagree)
 disagreement_areas = identify_conflicting_views(role_insights)
 tension_points = analyze_role_conflicts(role_recommendations)
+FOR each conflict IN disagreement_areas:
+    conflict.dissenting_roles = identify_dissenting_roles(conflict)
+END FOR
 
 # Innovation opportunity extraction
 innovation_opportunities = extract_breakthrough_ideas(role_insights)
 synergy_opportunities = identify_cross_role_synergies(role_insights)
 ```
 
-#### 4.3 Priority and Decision Matrix Generation
+#### 5.3 Priority and Decision Matrix Generation
 ```pseudo
 # Create comprehensive evaluation matrix
 FOR each recommendation:
@@ -137,16 +183,6 @@ SORT recommendations BY priority_score DESC
 ## 📊 **Output Specification**
 
 ### Output Location
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework structure
-├── [role]/analysis.md          # Input: Role analyses (multiple)
-└── synthesis-report.md         # ★ OUTPUT: Integrated synthesis with @ references
-```
-
-### Streamlined Single-Document Output ⚠️ SIMPLIFIED STRUCTURE
-
-#### Output Document - Single Comprehensive Synthesis
 The synthesis process creates **one consolidated document** that integrates all role perspectives:
 
 ```
@@ -157,30 +193,74 @@ The synthesis process creates **one consolidated document** that integrates all
 ```
 
 #### synthesis-specification.md Structure (Complete Specification)
+
+**Document Purpose**: Defines **"WHAT"** to build - comprehensive requirements and design blueprint.
+**Scope**: High-level features, requirements, and design specifications. Does NOT include executable task breakdown (that's IMPL_PLAN.md's responsibility).
+
 ```markdown
 # [Topic] - Integrated Implementation Specification
 
 **Framework Reference**: @topic-framework.md | **Generated**: [timestamp] | **Session**: WFS-[topic-slug]
 **Source Integration**: All brainstorming role perspectives consolidated
+**Document Type**: Requirements & Design Specification (WHAT to build)
 
 ## Executive Summary
 Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementation priorities.
 
+## Key Designs & Decisions
+### Core Architecture Diagram
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
+    B --> C[Component C]
+```
+*Reference: @system-architect/analysis.md#architecture-diagram*
+
+### User Journey Map
+![User Journey](./assets/user-journey.png)
+*Reference: @ux-expert/analysis.md#user-journey*
+
+### Data Model Overview
+```mermaid
+erDiagram
+    USER ||--o{ ORDER : places
+    ORDER ||--|{ LINE-ITEM : contains
+```
+*Reference: @data-architect/analysis.md#data-model*
+
+### Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
+**ADR-01: [Decision Title]**
+- **Context**: Background and problem statement
+- **Decision**: Chosen approach
+- **Rationale**: Why this approach was selected
+- **Reference**: @system-architect/analysis.md#adr-01
+
+## Controversial Points & Alternatives
+| Point | Adopted Solution | Alternative Solution(s) | Decision Rationale | Dissenting Roles |
+|-------|------------------|-------------------------|--------------------| -----------------|
+| Authentication | JWT Token (@security-expert) | Session-Cookie (@system-architect) | Stateless API support for multi-platform | System Architect noted session performance benefits |
+| UI Framework | React (@ui-designer) | Vue.js (@subject-matter-expert) | Team expertise and ecosystem maturity | Subject Matter Expert preferred Vue for learning curve |
+
+*This section preserves decision context and rejected alternatives for future reference.*
+
 ## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria
 ### Functional Requirements
-| ID | Description | Source | Priority | Acceptance | Dependencies |
-|----|-------------|--------|----------|------------|--------------|
-| FR-01 | Core feature | @role/analysis.md | High | Criteria | None |
+| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Source | Priority | Acceptance | Dependencies |
+|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|----------|------------|--------------|
+| FR-01 | User authentication | Enable secure multi-platform access | @product-manager/analysis.md | High | User can login via email/password | None |
+| FR-02 | Data export | User-requested analytics feature | @product-owner/analysis.md | Medium | Export to CSV/JSON | FR-01 |
 
 ### Non-Functional Requirements
-| ID | Description | Target | Validation |
-|----|-------------|--------|------------|
-| NFR-01 | Performance | <200ms | Testing |
+| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Target | Validation | Source |
+|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|------------|--------|
+| NFR-01 | Response time | UX research shows <200ms critical | <200ms | Load testing | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
+| NFR-02 | Data encryption | Compliance requirement | AES-256 | Security audit | @security-expert/analysis.md |
 
 ### Business Requirements
-| ID | Description | Value | Success Metric |
-|----|-------------|-------|----------------|
-| BR-01 | User engagement | High | 80% retention |
+| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Value | Success Metric | Source |
+|----|-------------|-------------------|-------|----------------|--------|
+| BR-01 | User retention | Market analysis shows engagement gap | High | 80% 30-day retention | @product-manager/analysis.md |
+| BR-02 | Revenue growth | Business case justification | High | 25% MRR increase | @product-owner/analysis.md |
 
 ## Design Specifications
 ### UI/UX Guidelines
@@ -201,7 +281,34 @@ Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementa
 - Compliance requirements and regulations
 - Technical quality and domain-specific patterns
 
-## Implementation Roadmap
+## Process & Collaboration Concerns
+**Consolidated from**: @scrum-master/analysis.md, @product-owner/analysis.md
+
+### Team Capability Assessment
+| Required Skill | Current Level | Gap Analysis | Mitigation Strategy | Reference |
+|----------------|---------------|--------------|---------------------|-----------|
+| Kubernetes | Intermediate | Need advanced knowledge | Training + external consultant | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
+| React Hooks | Advanced | Team ready | None | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
+
+### Process Risks
+| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation | Owner |
+|------|--------|-------------|------------|-------|
+| Cross-team API dependency | High | Medium | Early API contract definition | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
+| UX-Dev alignment gap | Medium | High | Weekly design sync meetings | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
+
+### Collaboration Patterns
+- **Design-Dev Pairing**: UI Designer and Frontend Dev pair programming for complex interactions
+- **Architecture Reviews**: Weekly arch review for system-level decisions
+- **User Testing Cadence**: Bi-weekly UX testing sessions with real users
+- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#collaboration
+
+### Timeline Constraints
+- **Blocking Dependencies**: Project-X API must complete before Phase 2
+- **Resource Constraints**: Only 2 backend developers available in Q1
+- **External Dependencies**: Third-party OAuth provider integration timeline
+- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#constraints
+
+## Implementation Roadmap (High-Level)
 ### Development Phases
 **Phase 1** (0-3 months): Foundation and core features
 **Phase 2** (3-6 months): Advanced features and integrations
@@ -212,10 +319,12 @@ Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementa
 - Testing strategy and quality assurance
 - Deployment and monitoring approach
 
-### Task Breakdown
-- Epic and feature mapping aligned with requirements
-- Sprint planning guidance with dependency management
-- Resource allocation and timeline recommendations
+### Feature Grouping (Epic-Level)
+- High-level feature grouping and prioritization
+- Epic-level dependencies and sequencing
+- Strategic milestones and release planning
+
+**Note**: Detailed task breakdown into executable work items is handled by `/workflow:plan` → `IMPL_PLAN.md`
 
 ## Risk Assessment & Mitigation
 ### Critical Risks Identified
@@ -235,6 +344,9 @@ Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementa
 
 ### Streamlined Status Synchronization
 Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+
+**Dynamic Role Participation**: The `participating_roles` and `roles_synthesized` values are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered.
+
 ```json
 {
   "phases": {
@@ -242,22 +354,47 @@ Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
       "status": "completed",
       "synthesis_completed": true,
       "completed_at": "timestamp",
-      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "product-owner", "scrum-master", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "data-architect", "subject-matter-expert", "test-strategist"],
+      "participating_roles": ["<dynamically-discovered-role-1>", "<dynamically-discovered-role-2>", "..."],
+      "available_roles": ["product-manager", "product-owner", "scrum-master", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "data-architect", "subject-matter-expert", "test-strategist"],
       "consolidated_output": {
         "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
       },
       "synthesis_quality": {
         "role_integration": "complete",
         "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
+        "decision_transparency": "alternatives_documented",
+        "process_risks_identified": true,
         "implementation_readiness": "ready"
       },
       "content_metrics": {
-        "roles_synthesized": 9,
-        "functional_requirements": 25,
-        "non_functional_requirements": 12,
-        "business_requirements": 8,
-        "implementation_phases": 3,
-        "risk_factors_identified": 8
+        "roles_synthesized": "<COUNT(participating_roles)>",
+        "functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "non_functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "business_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "architecture_decisions": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "controversial_points": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "diagrams_included": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "process_risks": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "team_skill_gaps": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "implementation_phases": "<dynamic-count>",
+        "risk_factors_identified": "<dynamic-count>"
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Example with actual values**:
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "BRAINSTORM": {
+      "status": "completed",
+      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "scrum-master"],
+      "content_metrics": {
+        "roles_synthesized": 5,
+        "functional_requirements": 18,
+        "controversial_points": 2
       }
     }
   }
@@ -268,28 +405,35 @@ Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
 
 ### Required Synthesis Elements
 - [ ] Integration of all available role analyses with comprehensive coverage
-- [ ] Clear identification of consensus areas and disagreement points
+- [ ] **Key Designs & Decisions**: Architecture diagrams, user journey maps, ADRs documented
+- [ ] **Controversial Points**: Disagreement points, alternatives, and decision rationale captured
+- [ ] **Process Concerns**: Team capability gaps, process risks, collaboration patterns identified
 - [ ] Quantified priority recommendation matrix with evaluation criteria
 - [ ] Actionable implementation plan with phased approach
 - [ ] Comprehensive risk assessment with mitigation strategies
 
 ### Synthesis Analysis Quality Standards
 - [ ] **Completeness**: Integrates all available role analyses without gaps
+- [ ] **Visual Clarity**: Key diagrams (architecture, data model, user journey) included via Mermaid or images
+- [ ] **Decision Transparency**: Documents not just decisions, but alternatives and why they were rejected
 - [ ] **Insight Generation**: Identifies cross-role patterns and deep insights
-- [ ] **Actionability**: Provides specific, executable recommendations and next steps
-- [ ] **Balance**: Considers all role perspectives and addresses concerns
+- [ ] **Actionability**: Provides specific, executable recommendations with rationale
+- [ ] **Balance**: Considers all role perspectives, including process-oriented roles (Scrum Master)
 - [ ] **Forward-Looking**: Includes long-term strategic and innovation considerations
 
 ### Output Validation Criteria
 - [ ] **Priority-Based**: Recommendations prioritized using multi-dimensional evaluation
-- [ ] **Resource-Aware**: Implementation plans consider resource and time constraints
-- [ ] **Risk-Managed**: Comprehensive risk assessment with mitigation strategies
+- [ ] **Context-Rich**: Each requirement includes rationale summary for immediate understanding
+- [ ] **Resource-Aware**: Team skill gaps and constraints explicitly documented
+- [ ] **Risk-Managed**: Both technical and process risks captured with mitigation strategies
 - [ ] **Measurable Success**: Clear success metrics and monitoring frameworks
 - [ ] **Clear Actions**: Specific next steps with assigned responsibilities and timelines
 
 ### Integration Excellence Standards
-- [ ] **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Successfully identifies and resolves role perspective conflicts
+- [ ] **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Successfully identifies and documents role perspective conflicts
+- [ ] **No Role Marginalization**: Process, UX, and compliance concerns equally visible as functional requirements
 - [ ] **Strategic Coherence**: Recommendations form coherent strategic direction
-- [ ] **Implementation Readiness**: Plans are detailed enough for immediate execution
+- [ ] **Implementation Readiness**: Plans detailed enough for immediate execution, with clear handoff to IMPL_PLAN.md
 - [ ] **Stakeholder Alignment**: Addresses needs and concerns of all key stakeholders
+- [ ] **Decision Traceability**: Every major decision traceable to source role analysis via @ references
 - [ ] **Continuous Improvement**: Establishes framework for ongoing optimization and learning

.claude/commands/workflow/design/auto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+---
+name: auto
+description: Orchestrate UI design refinement workflow with interactive checkpoints for user selection
+usage: /workflow:design:auto --session <session_id> --images "<glob>" --pages "<list>" [--variants <count>] [--batch-plan]
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --images \"refs/*.png\" --pages \"dashboard,auth\" [--variants 2] [--batch-plan]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:design:auto --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png" --pages "login,register"
+  - /workflow:design:auto --session WFS-dashboard --images "refs/*.jpg" --pages "dashboard" --variants 3 --batch-plan
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# UI Design Auto Workflow Command
+
+## Overview
+Semi-autonomous UI design workflow with interactive checkpoints: style extraction → **user selection** → consolidation → UI generation → **user confirmation** → design update → optional batch planning.
+
+## Coordinator Role
+**Checkpoint-based orchestrator**: Execute Phase 1 automatically, pause for user style selection, execute Phase 3, pause for user prototype confirmation, complete with optional batch task generation.
+
+## Execution Model - Checkpoint Workflow
+
+This workflow runs **semi-autonomously** with user checkpoints:
+
+1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-xxx --images "refs/*.png" --pages "dashboard,auth" [--batch-plan]`
+2. **Phase 1 executes** (style-extract) → Reports style cards → **⏸️ PAUSE FOR USER SELECTION**
+3. **User selects variants** → Runs `style-consolidate --variants "..."` → Auto-continues
+4. **Phase 3 executes** (ui-generate) → Reports prototypes → **⏸️ PAUSE FOR USER CONFIRMATION**
+5. **User confirms prototypes** → Runs `design-update --selected-prototypes "..."` → Auto-continues
+6. **Phase 5 executes** (batch-plan, optional) → Reports task files
+
+**Checkpoint Mechanism**:
+- TodoWrite tracks current phase with "awaiting_user_confirmation" status
+- System reports output location and exact command for next step
+- User runs provided command to continue workflow
+- Workflow resumes automatically after user input
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files or validate before Phase 1 (commands handle their own validation)
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command's output for next phase
+4. **Pause at Checkpoints**: After Phase 1 and Phase 3, pause and prompt user with exact command to continue
+5. **User-Driven Continuation**: Workflow resumes when user runs style-consolidate or design-update commands
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion and checkpoint
+
+## Parameter Requirements
+
+**Required Parameters**:
+- `--session <session_id>`: Active workflow session ID
+- `--images "<glob_pattern>"`: Reference image paths for style extraction
+- `--pages "<page_list>"`: Comma-separated list of pages to generate
+
+**Optional Parameters**:
+- `--variants <count>`: Number of UI variants per page (default: 1)
+- `--batch-plan`: Auto-generate implementation tasks for selected prototypes after design-update
+
+## 5-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Style Extraction
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:design:style-extract --session {session_id} --images \"{image_glob}\"")`
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify: `.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json` created
+- Extract: `style_cards_count` from output message
+- List available style variant IDs
+
+**Validation**:
+- Style cards successfully generated
+- At least one style variant available
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, mark checkpoint "awaiting_user_confirmation"
+
+**⏸️ CHECKPOINT 1: Pause for User Style Selection**
+
+```
+Phase 1 Complete: Style Extraction
+Style cards generated: {count}
+Available variants: {variant_ids}
+Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/
+
+⏸️  USER SELECTION REQUIRED
+Review style cards and select your preferred variants.
+Then run:
+
+/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-{session} --variants "{variant_ids}"
+
+Example: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-{session} --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Style Consolidation (User-Triggered)
+**User Command**: `/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session {session_id} --variants "{selected_variants}"`
+
+**After user runs command**:
+- Workflow automatically continues to Phase 3
+- Parse output: token_count, validation_status
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+**Output**:
+```
+Phase 2 Complete: Style Consolidation
+Design tokens: {count}
+Validation: {pass|warnings}
+Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
+
+Continuing to Phase 3: UI Generation...
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: UI Generation (Auto-Triggered after Phase 2)
+**Command Construction**:
+
+```bash
+variants_flag = --variants present ? "--variants {variants_count}" : ""
+command = "/workflow:design:ui-generate --session {session_id} --pages \"{page_list}\" {variants_flag}"
+```
+
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="{constructed_command}")`
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify: `.design/prototypes/*.html` files created
+- Extract: `prototype_count`, `page_list`, `generated_files` list
+
+**Validation**:
+- All requested pages generated
+- HTML and CSS files present for each variant
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, mark checkpoint "awaiting_user_confirmation"
+
+**⏸️ CHECKPOINT 2: Pause for User Prototype Confirmation**
+
+```
+Phase 3 Complete: UI Generation
+Prototypes generated: {count} ({page_list})
+Generated files: {file_list}
+Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
+
+⏸️  USER CONFIRMATION REQUIRED
+Review the generated prototypes and select your preferred variants.
+Then run:
+
+/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session} --selected-prototypes "{prototype_ids}"
+
+Example: /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session} --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2"
+
+Or to use all generated prototypes:
+/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Design System Integration (User-Triggered)
+**User Command**: `/workflow:design:design-update --session {session_id} [--selected-prototypes "{selected_prototypes}"]`
+
+**After user runs command**:
+- Workflow updates brainstorming artifacts
+- If --batch-plan flag present, automatically continues to Phase 5
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify: `synthesis-specification.md` updated
+- Verify: `ui-designer/style-guide.md` created/updated
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+
+**Output** (if --batch-plan NOT present):
+```
+UI Design Refinement Complete for session: WFS-{session}
+
+Design System Summary:
+- Tokens: {token_count} (OKLCH-based)
+- Prototypes: {prototype_count} ({page_list})
+- Validation: {pass|warnings}
+
+Updated Artifacts:
+✓ synthesis-specification.md (UI/UX Guidelines section)
+✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md (comprehensive style guide)
+✓ Design tokens ready for task generation
+
+Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/
+
+Next Steps:
+1. Review prototypes: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
+2. Continue to planning: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
+   (The plan phase will automatically discover and utilize the design system)
+```
+
+**Output** (if --batch-plan present):
+```
+Phase 4 Complete: Design System Integration
+Updated Artifacts:
+✓ synthesis-specification.md
+✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md
+
+Continuing to Phase 5: Batch Task Generation...
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Batch Task Generation (Optional, Auto-Triggered if --batch-plan)
+**Condition**: Only executes if `--batch-plan` flag present
+
+**Execution**:
+```bash
+FOR each page IN selected_prototypes_pages:
+  SlashCommand(command="/workflow:plan --agent \"Implement {page} page based on design system\"")
+
+  # Parse output task file location
+  task_files.add(output_location)
+```
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+Phase 5 Complete: Batch Task Generation
+Tasks generated for: {page_count} pages
+
+Generated task files:
+{task_file_list}
+
+Design workflow complete for session: WFS-{session}
+
+Next: /workflow:execute
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize (before Phase 1)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute style extraction from reference images", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute style consolidation and token validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing style consolidation"},
+  {"content": "Execute UI prototype generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI generation"},
+  {"content": "Execute design system integration to brainstorming", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing design system integration"}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute style extraction from reference images", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute style consolidation and token validation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style consolidation"},
+  {"content": "Execute UI prototype generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI generation"},
+  {"content": "Execute design system integration to brainstorming", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing design system integration"}
+]})
+
+// Continue pattern for Phase 2, 3, 4...
+```
+
+## Parameter Processing
+
+### Session Validation
+```bash
+# Verify active session
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+VERIFY: session_id parameter matches active session
+IF mismatch:
+    ERROR: "Session {session_id} is not active. Active session: {active_session_id}"
+```
+
+### Image Glob Expansion
+```bash
+# Expand glob pattern
+expanded_paths = bash(ls {image_glob})
+IF no files found:
+    ERROR: "No images found matching pattern: {image_glob}"
+VALIDATE: All files are image formats (.png, .jpg, .jpeg, .webp)
+```
+
+### Page List Parsing
+```bash
+# Parse comma-separated page list
+pages = split(page_list, ",")
+TRIM: whitespace from each page name
+VALIDATE: page_list not empty
+```
+
+## Data Flow
+
+```
+User Input
+  ├── session_id
+  ├── image_glob → expanded_image_paths
+  ├── page_list → parsed_pages[]
+  ├── --interactive → interactive_mode (bool)
+  └── --variants → variants_count (int)
+    ↓
+Phase 1: style-extract
+  Input: session_id, expanded_image_paths
+  Output: style-cards.json
+    ↓
+Phase 2: style-consolidate
+  Input: session_id, interactive_mode | auto-select
+  Output: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, tailwind.config.js
+    ↓
+Phase 3: ui-generate
+  Input: session_id, parsed_pages[], variants_count
+  Output: {page}-variant-{n}.html/css for each page
+    ↓
+Phase 4: design-update
+  Input: session_id
+  Output: Updated synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/style-guide.md
+    ↓
+Return summary to user
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Phase Execution Failures**:
+- **Keep phase `in_progress`**: Do not proceed to next phase
+- **Report error to user**: Include specific failure message from command
+- **Provide recovery instructions**: Suggest manual command execution with corrected parameters
+
+**Common Errors**:
+1. **Session not found**: Verify session exists and is active
+2. **No images found**: Check image glob pattern and file paths
+3. **Style extraction failed**: Retry with different images or manual style description
+4. **Consolidation validation errors**: Review validation-report.json and address token issues
+5. **UI generation failed**: Check synthesis-specification.md for requirements clarity
+6. **Integration conflicts**: Review synthesis-specification.md edit conflicts
+
+## Workflow Position
+
+**In Complete Development Flow**:
+```
+/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "{topic}"
+    ↓ Generates synthesis-specification.md (WHAT)
+    ↓
+/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-xxx --images "refs/*.png" --pages "dashboard,auth"
+    ↓ Refines visual design (WHAT → Visual Spec)
+    ↓
+/workflow:plan [--agent] "{task description}"
+    ↓ Generates task breakdown (HOW)
+    ↓
+/workflow:execute
+    ↓ Implements tasks with design system
+```
+
+**Key Benefits**:
+1. **Visual Validation**: Users confirm design before implementation
+2. **Token Enforcement**: Implementation strictly follows design system
+3. **Accessibility**: WCAG AA validated at design phase
+4. **Consistency**: Single source of truth for visual design
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command execution
+✅ Validate session parameter before Phase 1
+✅ Expand image glob to concrete paths
+✅ Parse page list to array
+✅ Execute Phase 1 immediately (no preliminary analysis)
+✅ Parse style card count from Phase 1 output
+✅ Construct Phase 2 command based on --interactive flag
+✅ Parse token count and validation status from Phase 2
+✅ Construct Phase 3 command with variants parameter
+✅ Parse prototype count from Phase 3 output
+✅ Execute Phase 4 design system integration
+✅ Verify all artifacts updated successfully
+✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
+✅ After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoWrite status
+
+## Integration Notes
+
+**Seamless Workflow Transition**:
+- Design phase is **optional but recommended** for UI-heavy projects
+- Can be skipped entirely if visual design is not critical
+- Brainstorming → Plan flow still works without design phase
+- Design artifacts automatically discovered by task-generate if present
+
+**Use Cases**:
+- **Use design workflow**: User-facing applications, design systems, brand-critical UIs
+- **Skip design workflow**: Backend APIs, CLI tools, prototypes, MVPs
+
+**Artifact Discovery**:
+- `task-generate` automatically detects `.design/` directory
+- If present, adds design system to task context.artifacts
+- UI tasks automatically include `load_design_tokens` in flow_control
+
+This design ensures backward compatibility while enabling powerful visual design workflows when needed.

.claude/commands/workflow/design/design-update.md

@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
+---
+name: design-update
+description: Update brainstorming artifacts with finalized design system
+usage: /workflow:design:design-update --session <session_id> [--selected-prototypes "<list>"]
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--selected-prototypes \"dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2\"]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-auth
+  - /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-dashboard --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1"
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Design Update Command
+
+## Overview
+Synchronize finalized design system (tokens, style guide, selected prototypes) back to brainstorming artifacts, preparing for `/workflow:plan` phase consumption.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Main Claude Execution**: Direct updates by main Claude (avoid Agent context loss, following synthesis pattern)
+- **Reference-Based Integration**: Use @ references, not content duplication
+- **Synthesis Alignment**: Update synthesis-specification.md UI/UX Guidelines section
+- **UI Designer Sync**: Mirror design system to ui-designer/style-guide.md
+- **Plan-Ready Output**: Ensure design artifacts discoverable by task-generate
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Design System Validation
+```bash
+# Validate session and verify design system completeness
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
+
+VERIFY required artifacts:
+- .design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+- .design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+- .design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js
+- .design/prototypes/*.html (at least one prototype)
+
+IF --selected-prototypes provided:
+    VALIDATE: Specified prototypes exist
+ELSE:
+    AUTO-SELECT: Use all generated prototypes
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Load Design System Context
+**Direct Claude Code Execution** (no Agent invocation)
+
+```bash
+# Load all design system artifacts
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js)
+
+# Load selected prototype files
+FOR each selected_prototype IN selected_prototypes:
+    Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/{selected_prototype}.html)
+    Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/{selected_prototype}-notes.md)
+
+# Load target brainstorming artifacts
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md) [if exists]
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Update Synthesis Specification
+**Direct Write by Main Claude**
+
+Update `.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md`:
+
+```markdown
+## UI/UX Guidelines
+
+### Design System Reference
+**Finalized Design Tokens**: @../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+**Style Guide**: @../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+**Tailwind Configuration**: @../.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js
+
+### Design Philosophy
+[Insert content from style-philosophy.md]
+
+### Token System Overview
+**Colors**: OKLCH-based color system with semantic naming
+- Brand: primary, secondary, accent
+- Surface: background, elevated, sunken
+- Semantic: success, warning, error, info
+
+**Typography**: {font_family_count} font families, {scale_count}-step scale
+- Heading: {heading_font}
+- Body: {body_font}
+- Monospace: {mono_font}
+
+**Spacing**: {scale_count}-step scale ({min}rem to {max}rem)
+
+**Components**: Border radius, shadows, and component tokens defined
+
+### Implementation Requirements
+**Token Adherence**: All UI implementations MUST use design token CSS custom properties
+**Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance validated in design-tokens.json
+**Responsive**: Mobile-first design using token-based breakpoints
+**Component Patterns**: Follow patterns documented in style-guide.md
+
+### Reference Prototypes
+[For each selected prototype:]
+- **{page_name}**: @../.design/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+  - Layout: {layout_description from notes}
+  - Components: {component_list from notes}
+  - Token Usage: {token_usage_summary from notes}
+
+### Design System Assets (for task-generate consumption)
+```json
+{
+  "design_tokens": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json",
+  "style_guide": ".design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md",
+  "tailwind_config": ".design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js",
+  "prototypes": [
+    ".design/prototypes/{prototype-1}.html",
+    ".design/prototypes/{prototype-2}.html"
+  ]
+}
+```
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+# Edit synthesis-specification.md
+Edit(
+  file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+  old_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n[existing content or empty]",
+  new_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n\n[new design system content with @ references]"
+)
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update UI Designer Analysis
+**Create or update** `.brainstorming/ui-designer/style-guide.md`:
+
+```markdown
+# UI Designer Style Guide
+
+## Design System Integration
+This style guide integrates the finalized design system from the design refinement phase.
+
+**Source Design Tokens**: @../../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+**Source Style Guide**: @../../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+
+## Design Philosophy
+[Content from style-philosophy.md]
+
+## Design Tokens Reference
+For complete token definitions, see: @../../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+
+### Color System
+[Summary of color tokens]
+
+### Typography System
+[Summary of typography tokens]
+
+### Spacing System
+[Summary of spacing tokens]
+
+### Component Tokens
+[Summary of component tokens: border-radius, shadows]
+
+## Component Patterns
+[Reference to style-guide.md component patterns]
+
+## Implementation Guidelines
+1. **Use CSS Custom Properties**: All styles reference design tokens
+2. **Follow Semantic HTML**: Use HTML5 semantic elements
+3. **Maintain Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance required
+4. **Responsive Design**: Mobile-first with token-based breakpoints
+
+## Reference Prototypes
+[Links to selected prototypes with descriptions]
+
+---
+*Auto-generated by /workflow:design:design-update*
+*Last updated: {timestamp}*
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+Write(
+  file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/style-guide.md",
+  content="[generated style guide content with @ references]"
+)
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Create Design System Symlinks (Optional)
+**For easier task-generate discovery**
+
+```bash
+# Create read-only mirror of key design files in brainstorming space
+bash(cd .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming && \
+     ln -s ../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json design-tokens.json && \
+     ln -s ../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md design-style-guide.md)
+```
+
+### Phase 6: TodoWrite Integration
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Validate session and design system completeness",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Validating design system"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load design tokens, style guide, and selected prototypes",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Loading design artifacts"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Update synthesis-specification.md with design system references",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Updating synthesis specification"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Create or update ui-designer/style-guide.md",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Updating UI designer style guide"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Create design system symlinks for task-generate discovery",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Creating artifact symlinks"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+**Updated Files**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+├── synthesis-specification.md       # Updated with UI/UX Guidelines section
+├── ui-designer/
+│   └── style-guide.md               # New or updated comprehensive style guide
+├── design-tokens.json               # Symlink to ../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
+└── design-style-guide.md            # Symlink to ../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
+```
+
+**Reference Structure** (@ references in synthesis-specification.md):
+- `@../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json`
+- `@../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md`
+- `@../.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js`
+- `@../.design/prototypes/{prototype}.html`
+
+## Integration with task-generate
+
+After this update, `/workflow:tools:task-generate` will discover:
+
+**In context.artifacts**:
+```json
+{
+  "artifacts": [
+    {
+      "type": "synthesis_specification",
+      "path": ".brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "design_tokens",
+      "path": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "style_guide",
+      "path": ".design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "tailwind_config",
+      "path": ".design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "ui_prototypes",
+      "paths": [
+        ".design/prototypes/dashboard-variant-1.html",
+        ".design/prototypes/auth-variant-2.html"
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**In flow_control.pre_analysis** (for UI tasks):
+```json
+{
+  "step": "load_design_tokens",
+  "action": "Load design system tokens and style guide",
+  "commands": [
+    "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)",
+    "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md)"
+  ],
+  "output_to": "design_system_context",
+  "on_error": "warn"
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+- **Missing design tokens**: Error, run `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` first
+- **Missing prototypes**: Error, run `/workflow:design:ui-generate` first
+- **synthesis-specification.md not found**: Warning, create minimal version
+- **Edit conflicts**: Preserve existing content, append design system section
+- **Symlink failures**: Warning only, continue with @ references
+
+## Validation Checks
+After update, verify:
+- [ ] synthesis-specification.md contains UI/UX Guidelines section
+- [ ] UI/UX Guidelines include @ references to design system files
+- [ ] ui-designer/style-guide.md created or updated
+- [ ] design-tokens.json symlink created (if applicable)
+- [ ] All referenced files exist and are readable
+
+## Integration Points
+- **Input**: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, prototypes from design phase
+- **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/style-guide.md
+- **Next Phase**: `/workflow:plan` can now discover and utilize design system
+
+## Completion Message
+
+```
+Design system update complete for session: WFS-{session}
+
+Updated artifacts:
+✓ synthesis-specification.md - UI/UX Guidelines section added
+✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md - Comprehensive style guide created
+✓ Design system references: @ notation for all design files
+
+Design system assets ready for task generation:
+- design-tokens.json ({token_count} tokens)
+- style-guide.md (comprehensive component patterns)
+- tailwind.config.js (Tailwind theme extension)
+- {prototype_count} reference prototypes
+
+Next: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
+      The plan phase will automatically discover and utilize the design system.
+```
+
+## Main Claude Direct Execution Rationale
+
+This command is executed directly by main Claude (not delegated to an Agent) because:
+
+1. **Context Preservation**: Main Claude has full session context and conversation memory
+2. **Integration Complexity**: Requires understanding multiple artifact relationships
+3. **Reference Accuracy**: @ reference generation needs precise path resolution
+4. **Synthesis Pattern**: Follows the same direct-execution pattern as `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis`
+5. **Minimal Transformation**: Primarily reference integration, not generative analysis
+6. **Error Recovery**: Main Claude can better handle edit conflicts and missing files
+
+This approach ensures reliable, context-aware integration without Agent handoff overhead.

.claude/commands/workflow/design/style-consolidate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+---
+name: style-consolidate
+description: Consolidate user-selected style variants into unified design system
+usage: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session <session_id> [--interactive] [--variants "<ids>"]
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--interactive] [--variants \"variant-1,variant-3\"]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-auth --interactive
+  - /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-dashboard --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Style Consolidation Command
+
+## Overview
+Consolidate user-selected style variants into a unified, production-ready design system with validated CSS tokens and comprehensive style guide.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **User-Driven Selection**: Interactive mode for visual style card selection
+- **Gemini Clustering**: Semantic naming and style philosophy consolidation
+- **Codex Validation**: Token consistency, coverage, and accessibility checks
+- **Design System Output**: production-ready tokens + comprehensive style guide
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Style Cards Loading
+```bash
+# Validate session and load extracted style cards
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
+VERIFY: .design/style-extraction/style-cards.json exists
+LOAD: style-cards.json for user selection
+```
+
+### Phase 2: User Selection (Interactive Mode)
+**Interactive Mode**: `--interactive` flag enables visual selection interface
+
+```bash
+IF --interactive:
+    DISPLAY: Style card previews with descriptions
+    PROMPT: "Select preferred style variants (comma-separated IDs):"
+    COLLECT: user_selection (e.g., "variant-1,variant-3")
+ELSE IF --variants provided:
+    PARSE: variant IDs from --variants flag
+ELSE:
+    ERROR: "Must provide either --interactive or --variants parameter"
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Gemini Style Philosophy Consolidation
+**Agent Invocation**: Task(conceptual-planning-agent) with Gemini capabilities
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Consolidate selected style variants into unified design philosophy
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_TASK: style-consolidation
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
+SELECTED_VARIANTS: {user_selected_variant_ids}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_selected_variants**
+   - Action: Load user-selected style card data
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+   - Filter: Extract only selected variant IDs
+   - Output: selected_style_data
+
+2. **load_design_context**
+   - Action: Load brainstorming design context
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md) || Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md)
+   - Output: design_context
+   - Optional: true
+
+3. **consolidate_style_philosophy_gemini**
+   - Action: Synthesize unified style philosophy and semantic naming
+   - Command: bash(cd .workflow/WFS-{session} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p \"
+     PURPOSE: Synthesize unified design philosophy from selected style variants
+     TASK: Create coherent style narrative, consolidate naming conventions, define design principles
+     MODE: write
+     CONTEXT: @{.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json,.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md}
+     EXPECTED:
+     1. Unified design philosophy statement
+     2. Consolidated semantic naming for colors (e.g., 'brand-primary', 'surface-elevated')
+     3. Typography scale rationale
+     4. Spacing system principles
+     5. Component design guidelines
+     RULES: Ensure consistency, maintain accessibility mindset, align with brainstorming synthesis
+     \")
+   - Output: style-philosophy.md
+
+## Consolidation Requirements
+**Design Philosophy**: Clear statement of visual design principles
+**Semantic Naming**: User-centric token names (not generic color-1, color-2)
+**Accessibility**: Ensure WCAG AA contrast ratios for text colors
+**Consistency**: Unified token naming conventions across all categories
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **style-philosophy.md**: Design philosophy and naming rationale
+"
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Codex Token Validation & Finalization
+**Agent Invocation**: Task(conceptual-planning-agent) with Codex capabilities
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Validate and finalize production-ready design tokens
+
+## Context Loading
+INPUT_PHILOSOPHY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md
+INPUT_TOKENS: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/design-tokens.json
+SELECTED_VARIANTS: {user_selected_variant_ids}
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_consolidation_inputs**
+   - Action: Load style philosophy and extracted tokens
+   - Commands:
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md)
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/design-tokens.json)
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+   - Output: consolidation_inputs
+
+2. **validate_and_finalize_tokens_codex**
+   - Action: Merge selected variants, validate consistency, generate final tokens
+   - Command: bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation --full-auto exec \"
+     PURPOSE: Finalize production-ready design tokens with validation
+     TASK: Merge selected variant tokens, validate consistency, check accessibility, generate final design system
+     MODE: auto
+     CONTEXT: @{style-philosophy.md,../style-extraction/design-tokens.json,../style-extraction/style-cards.json,../../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED:
+     1. design-tokens.json - Final validated CSS token definitions
+     2. tailwind.config.js - Complete Tailwind configuration
+     3. style-guide.md - Comprehensive design system documentation
+     4. validation-report.json - Token consistency and accessibility audit
+     RULES:
+     - Use semantic names from style-philosophy.md
+     - Validate WCAG AA contrast ratios (4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI)
+     - Ensure complete token coverage (colors, typography, spacing, shadows, borders)
+     - Generate CSS custom properties and Tailwind theme extension
+     - Include usage examples in style-guide.md
+     \" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
+   - Output: design-tokens.json, tailwind.config.js, style-guide.md, validation-report.json
+
+## Validation Requirements
+**Consistency Checks**:
+- All color tokens use OKLCH format
+- Spacing scale follows consistent ratio (e.g., 1.5x or 2x progression)
+- Typography scale includes appropriate line-heights
+- All tokens have semantic names
+
+**Accessibility Checks**:
+- Text colors meet WCAG AA contrast (4.5:1)
+- UI component colors meet WCAG AA contrast (3:1)
+- Focus indicators have sufficient visibility
+- Color is not sole differentiator
+
+**Coverage Checks**:
+- Primary, secondary, accent color families
+- Surface colors (background, elevated, sunken)
+- Semantic colors (success, warning, error, info)
+- Typography scale (xs to 4xl)
+- Spacing scale (0.25rem to 6rem)
+- Border radius options
+- Shadow layers
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **design-tokens.json**: Production-ready CSS token definitions
+2. **tailwind.config.js**: Complete Tailwind theme configuration
+3. **style-guide.md**: Design system documentation with usage examples
+4. **validation-report.json**: Validation audit results
+"
+```
+
+### Phase 5: TodoWrite Integration
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Load session and style cards from extraction phase",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Loading style cards"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Collect user style variant selection (interactive or CLI)",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Collecting user selection"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Consolidate style philosophy using Gemini",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Consolidating style philosophy"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Validate and finalize tokens using Codex",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Validating and finalizing tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate design system documentation",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Generating design system docs"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
+├── style-philosophy.md          # Unified design philosophy (Gemini)
+├── design-tokens.json           # Final validated CSS tokens (Codex)
+├── tailwind.config.js           # Tailwind theme configuration (Codex)
+├── style-guide.md               # Design system documentation (Codex)
+└── validation-report.json       # Accessibility & consistency audit (Codex)
+```
+
+### design-tokens.json Format
+```json
+{
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {
+      "primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
+      "secondary": "oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / 1)",
+      "accent": "oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / 1)"
+    },
+    "surface": {
+      "background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
+      "elevated": "oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / 1)",
+      "sunken": "oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / 1)"
+    },
+    "semantic": {
+      "success": "oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / 1)",
+      "warning": "oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / 1)",
+      "error": "oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / 1)",
+      "info": "oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / 1)"
+    }
+  },
+  "typography": {
+    "font_family": {
+      "heading": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif",
+      "body": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif",
+      "mono": "Fira Code, monospace"
+    },
+    "font_size": {
+      "xs": "0.75rem",
+      "sm": "0.875rem",
+      "base": "1rem",
+      "lg": "1.125rem",
+      "xl": "1.25rem",
+      "2xl": "1.5rem",
+      "3xl": "1.875rem",
+      "4xl": "2.25rem"
+    },
+    "line_height": {
+      "tight": "1.25",
+      "normal": "1.5",
+      "relaxed": "1.75"
+    }
+  },
+  "spacing": {
+    "0": "0",
+    "1": "0.25rem",
+    "2": "0.5rem",
+    "3": "0.75rem",
+    "4": "1rem",
+    "6": "1.5rem",
+    "8": "2rem",
+    "12": "3rem",
+    "16": "4rem",
+    "24": "6rem"
+  },
+  "border_radius": {
+    "none": "0",
+    "sm": "0.25rem",
+    "md": "0.5rem",
+    "lg": "0.75rem",
+    "xl": "1rem",
+    "2xl": "1.5rem",
+    "full": "9999px"
+  },
+  "shadow": {
+    "sm": "0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
+    "md": "0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06)",
+    "lg": "0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
+    "xl": "0 20px 25px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.15), 0 10px 10px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.04)"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+- **No style cards found**: Run `/workflow:design:style-extract` first
+- **Invalid variant IDs**: Display available IDs and prompt re-selection
+- **Validation failures**: Report specific issues (contrast, coverage, consistency)
+- **Gemini/Codex execution errors**: Retry with fallback to manual token editing
+
+## Integration Points
+- **Input**: style-cards.json from `/workflow:design:style-extract`
+- **Output**: design-tokens.json for `/workflow:design:ui-generate`
+- **Context**: synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/analysis.md
+
+## Next Steps
+After successful consolidation:
+```
+Style consolidation complete for session: WFS-{session}
+Design tokens validated and finalized
+
+Validation summary:
+- Colors: {count} (WCAG AA compliant: {pass_count}/{total_count})
+- Typography: {scale_count} sizes
+- Spacing: {scale_count} values
+- Accessibility: {pass|warnings}
+
+Next: /workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-{session} --pages "dashboard,auth"
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/design/style-extract.md

@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+---
+name: style-extract
+description: Extract design style from reference images using triple vision analysis (Claude Code + Gemini + Codex)
+usage: /workflow:design:style-extract --session <session_id> --images "<glob_pattern>"
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --images \"path/to/*.png\""
+examples:
+  - /workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png"
+  - /workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-dashboard --images "refs/dashboard-*.jpg"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
+---
+
+# Style Extraction Command
+
+## Overview
+Extract design style elements from reference images using triple vision analysis: Claude Code's native vision, Gemini Vision for semantic understanding, and Codex for structured token generation.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Triple Vision Analysis**: Combine Claude Code, Gemini Vision, and Codex vision capabilities
+- **Comprehensive Coverage**: Claude Code for quick analysis, Gemini for deep semantic understanding, Codex for structured output
+- **Consensus-Based Extraction**: Synthesize results from all three sources
+- **Style Card System**: Generate reusable style cards for consolidation phase
+- **Multi-Image Support**: Process multiple reference images and extract common patterns
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Input Validation
+```bash
+# Validate session and locate images
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
+EXPAND: glob pattern to concrete image paths
+VERIFY: at least one image file exists
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Claude Code Vision Analysis (Quick Initial Pass)
+**Direct Execution**: Use Read tool with image paths
+
+```bash
+# Claude Code's native vision capability for quick initial analysis
+FOR each image IN expanded_image_paths:
+  Read({image_path})
+  # Claude Code analyzes image and extracts basic patterns
+
+# Write preliminary analysis
+Write(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/claude_vision_analysis.json)
+```
+
+**Output**: `claude_vision_analysis.json` with Claude Code's initial observations
+
+### Phase 3: Gemini Vision Analysis (Deep Semantic Understanding)
+**Direct Bash Execution**: No agent wrapper
+
+```bash
+bash(cd .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction && \
+  ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
+    PURPOSE: Extract deep design semantics from reference images
+    TASK: Analyze color palettes, typography, spacing, layout principles, component styles, design philosophy
+    MODE: write
+    CONTEXT: @{../../{image_paths}}
+    EXPECTED: JSON with comprehensive semantic style description (colors with names, font characteristics, spacing scale, design philosophy, UI patterns)
+    RULES: Focus on extracting semantic meaning and design intent, not exact pixel values. Identify design system patterns.
+  ")
+
+# Output: gemini_vision_analysis.json
+```
+
+**Output**: `gemini_vision_analysis.json` with Gemini's deep semantic analysis
+
+### Phase 4: Codex Vision Analysis (Structured Pattern Recognition)
+**Direct Bash Execution**: Codex with -i parameter
+
+```bash
+bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction --full-auto -i {image_paths} exec "
+  PURPOSE: Analyze reference images for structured design patterns
+  TASK: Extract color values, typography specs, spacing measurements, component patterns
+  MODE: auto
+  CONTEXT: Reference images provided via -i parameter
+  EXPECTED: Structured JSON with precise design specifications
+  RULES: Focus on measurable design attributes and component patterns
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
+
+# Output: codex_vision_analysis.json
+```
+
+**Output**: `codex_vision_analysis.json` with Codex's structured analysis
+
+### Phase 5: Synthesis of Triple Vision Analysis
+**Direct Execution**: Main Claude synthesizes all three analyses
+
+```bash
+# Read all three vision analysis results
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/claude_vision_analysis.json)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/gemini_vision_analysis.json)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/codex_vision_analysis.json)
+
+# Load optional session context
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md) [optional]
+
+# Synthesize consensus analysis
+# Main Claude identifies common patterns, resolves conflicts, creates unified semantic analysis
+Write(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/semantic_style_analysis.json)
+```
+
+**Synthesis Strategy**:
+- **Color system**: Consensus from all three sources, prefer Codex for precise values
+- **Typography**: Gemini for semantic understanding, Codex for measurements
+- **Spacing**: Cross-validate across all three,identify consistent patterns
+- **Design philosophy**: Weighted combination with Gemini having highest weight
+- **Conflict resolution**: Majority vote or use context from synthesis-specification.md
+
+**Output**: `semantic_style_analysis.json` - unified analysis synthesizing all three sources
+
+### Phase 6: Structured Token Generation
+**Direct Bash Execution**: Codex generates CSS tokens
+
+```bash
+bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction --full-auto exec "
+  PURPOSE: Convert synthesized semantic analysis to structured CSS design tokens
+  TASK: Generate W3C-compliant design tokens, Tailwind config, and style card variants
+  MODE: auto
+  CONTEXT: @{semantic_style_analysis.json,../../../../CLAUDE.md}
+  EXPECTED: design-tokens.json (OKLCH format), tailwind-tokens.js, style-cards.json (3 variants)
+  RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/design-tokens-schema.md) | OKLCH colors, rem spacing, semantic naming
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `design-tokens.json`: W3C-compliant tokens in OKLCH format
+- `tailwind-tokens.js`: Tailwind theme extension
+- `style-cards.json`: 3 style variant cards for user selection
+   - Command: bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction --full-auto exec \"
+     PURPOSE: Generate structured CSS design tokens from semantic analysis
+     TASK: Convert semantic color/typography/spacing to OKLCH CSS variables and Tailwind config
+     MODE: auto
+     CONTEXT: @{semantic_style_analysis.json,../../../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED:
+     1. design-tokens.json with OKLCH color values, font stacks, spacing scale
+     2. tailwind-tokens.js with Tailwind config extension
+     3. style-cards.json with named style variants for user selection
+     RULES: Use OKLCH for colors, rem for spacing, maintain semantic naming, generate 2-3 style card variants
+     \" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
+   - Output: design-tokens.json, tailwind-tokens.js, style-cards.json
+
+## Token Requirements
+**Color Format**: OKLCH with fallback (e.g., \"oklch(0.65 0.15 270 / 1)\")
+**Spacing Scale**: rem-based (0.25rem, 0.5rem, 1rem, 1.5rem, 2rem, 3rem, 4rem, 6rem)
+**Typography Scale**: rem-based with line-height (xs, sm, base, lg, xl, 2xl, 3xl, 4xl)
+**Border Radius**: rem-based (none, sm, md, lg, xl, 2xl, full)
+**Shadows**: Layered shadows with OKLCH colors
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **design-tokens.json**: Structured CSS token definitions
+2. **tailwind-tokens.js**: Tailwind configuration extension
+3. **style-cards.json**: Multiple style variants for user selection
+"
+```
+
+### Phase 4: TodoWrite Integration
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Validate session and locate reference images",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Validating session and images"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Extract visual semantics using Gemini Vision",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Extracting visual semantics"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate structured CSS tokens using Codex",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Generating CSS tokens"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Create style cards for consolidation phase",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Creating style cards"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/
+├── semantic_style_analysis.json    # Gemini Vision semantic analysis
+├── design-tokens.json              # Structured CSS tokens (OKLCH)
+├── tailwind-tokens.js              # Tailwind config extension
+└── style-cards.json                # Style variants for user selection
+```
+
+### style-cards.json Format
+```json
+{
+  "style_cards": [
+    {
+      "id": "variant-1",
+      "name": "Modern Minimalist",
+      "description": "Clean, high contrast with bold typography",
+      "preview": {
+        "primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
+        "background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
+        "font_heading": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif",
+        "border_radius": "0.5rem"
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "variant-2",
+      "name": "Soft Neumorphic",
+      "description": "Subtle shadows with gentle colors",
+      "preview": {
+        "primary": "oklch(0.60 0.10 200 / 1)",
+        "background": "oklch(0.95 0.02 200 / 1)",
+        "font_heading": "Poppins, sans-serif",
+        "border_radius": "1rem"
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+- **No images found**: Report error and suggest correct glob pattern
+- **Gemini Vision failure**: Retry once, then fall back to manual style description
+- **Codex token generation failure**: Use default token template and report warning
+- **Invalid session**: Prompt user to start workflow session first
+
+## Integration Points
+- **Input**: Reference images (PNG, JPG, WebP)
+- **Output**: Style cards for `/workflow:design:style-consolidate`
+- **Context**: Optional synthesis-specification.md or ui-designer/analysis.md
+
+## Next Steps
+After successful extraction:
+```
+Style extraction complete for session: WFS-{session}
+Style cards generated: {count}
+
+Next: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-{session} [--interactive]
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/design/ui-generate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+---
+name: ui-generate
+description: Generate UI prototypes using consolidated design tokens with optional style overrides
+usage: /workflow:design:ui-generate --session <session_id> --pages "<page_list>" [--variants <count>] [--style-overrides "<path_or_json>"]
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --pages \"dashboard,auth\" [--variants 2] [--style-overrides \"overrides.json\"]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-auth --pages "login,register"
+  - /workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-dashboard --pages "dashboard" --variants 3 --style-overrides "overrides.json"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# UI Generation Command
+
+## Overview
+Generate production-ready UI prototypes (HTML/CSS) strictly adhering to consolidated design tokens and synthesis specification requirements.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Token-Driven**: All styles reference design-tokens.json, no hardcoded values
+- **Specification-Aligned**: UI structure follows synthesis-specification.md requirements
+- **Codex Primary**: Code generation with strict token enforcement
+- **Gemini Variants**: Optional semantic layout variations
+- **Production-Ready**: Clean HTML5, semantic markup, accessibility attributes
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Requirements Loading
+```bash
+# Validate session and load design system
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
+VERIFY: .design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json exists
+PARSE: --pages parameter to page list
+SET: variants_count = --variants || 1
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Context Gathering
+**Load comprehensive context for UI generation**
+
+```bash
+LOAD: design-tokens.json (style system)
+LOAD: style-guide.md (usage guidelines)
+LOAD: synthesis-specification.md (functional requirements)
+LOAD: ui-designer/analysis.md (UX guidelines, optional)
+PARSE: page_requirements for each page in --pages list
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Codex UI Generation (Primary)
+**Agent Invocation**: Task(conceptual-planning-agent) with Codex capabilities
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Generate production-ready UI prototypes with strict design token adherence
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_TASK: ui-prototype-generation
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
+TARGET_PAGES: {page_list}
+VARIANTS_PER_PAGE: {variants_count}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_design_system**
+   - Action: Load finalized design tokens and style guide
+   - Commands:
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md)
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js)
+   - Output: design_system
+
+2. **load_requirements**
+   - Action: Load functional and UX requirements
+   - Commands:
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
+     - Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md) [optional]
+   - Output: requirements_context
+
+3. **generate_ui_prototypes_codex**
+   - Action: Generate HTML/CSS prototypes with strict token enforcement
+   - Command: bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes --full-auto exec \"
+     PURPOSE: Generate production-ready UI prototypes adhering to design tokens
+     TASK: Create HTML/CSS prototypes for pages: {page_list} with {variants_count} variant(s) each
+     MODE: auto
+     CONTEXT: @{../style-consolidation/design-tokens.json,../style-consolidation/style-guide.md,../../.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md,../../../../CLAUDE.md}
+     EXPECTED:
+     For each page, generate {variants_count} variant(s):
+     1. {page}-variant-{n}.html - Complete HTML structure
+     2. {page}-variant-{n}.css - CSS using design token custom properties
+     3. {page}-variant-{n}-notes.md - Implementation notes and token usage
+
+     RULES:
+     - ALL styles MUST reference design token CSS custom properties (--color-brand-primary, --spacing-4, etc.)
+     - NO hardcoded colors, spacing, or typography values
+     - Use semantic HTML5 elements (header, nav, main, section, article, footer)
+     - Include ARIA labels and accessibility attributes (role, aria-label, aria-describedby)
+     - Implement responsive design using token-based breakpoints
+     - Follow component patterns from style-guide.md
+     - Include placeholder content matching page purpose
+     - Variants explore different layouts while maintaining token consistency
+     - Generate CSS custom properties mapping in each CSS file
+     \" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
+   - Output: {page}-variant-{n}.html, {page}-variant-{n}.css, {page}-variant-{n}-notes.md
+
+## Generation Requirements
+
+**Token Adherence**:
+- Use CSS custom properties for all design values
+- Reference design-tokens.json for property definitions
+- Example: `color: var(--color-brand-primary);`
+- Example: `padding: var(--spacing-4) var(--spacing-6);`
+- Example: `font-size: var(--font-size-lg);`
+
+**Semantic HTML**:
+```html
+<header role=\"banner\">
+  <nav role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Main navigation\">
+    <!-- Navigation items -->
+  </nav>
+</header>
+<main role=\"main\">
+  <section aria-labelledby=\"section-heading\">
+    <h2 id=\"section-heading\">Section Title</h2>
+    <!-- Content -->
+  </section>
+</main>
+<footer role=\"contentinfo\">
+  <!-- Footer content -->
+</footer>
+```
+
+**Accessibility Requirements**:
+- Proper heading hierarchy (h1 → h2 → h3)
+- Alt text for images
+- ARIA labels for interactive elements
+- Keyboard navigation support
+- Focus indicators using token colors
+- Sufficient color contrast (validated against tokens)
+
+**Responsive Design**:
+- Mobile-first approach
+- Token-based breakpoints (e.g., --breakpoint-md: 768px)
+- Flexible layouts using CSS Grid or Flexbox
+- Responsive typography using clamp() with token values
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+For each page in {page_list}:
+1. **{page}-variant-{n}.html**: Complete HTML prototype
+2. **{page}-variant-{n}.css**: Token-driven CSS
+3. **{page}-variant-{n}-notes.md**: Implementation notes
+"
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Gemini Variant Suggestions (Optional)
+**Conditional Execution**: Only if --variants > 1
+
+```bash
+IF variants_count > 1:
+  Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+  Generate semantic layout variation suggestions using Gemini
+
+  TASK: Analyze synthesis-specification.md and suggest {variants_count} layout approaches
+  CONTEXT: synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/analysis.md
+  OUTPUT: variant-suggestions.md with layout rationale for each variant
+
+  Use Gemini to explore:
+  - Different information hierarchy approaches
+  - Alternative component compositions
+  - Varied user flow emphasis
+  - Diverse layout patterns (sidebar, top-nav, card-grid, list-detail)
+  "
+```
+
+### Phase 5: TodoWrite Integration
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Validate session and load design system",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Loading design system"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Load functional requirements and UX guidelines",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Loading requirements"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate UI prototypes using Codex with token enforcement",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Generating UI prototypes"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Generate layout variant suggestions using Gemini (optional)",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Generating variant suggestions"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Create implementation notes for each prototype",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Creating implementation notes"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
+├── dashboard-variant-1.html
+├── dashboard-variant-1.css
+├── dashboard-variant-1-notes.md
+├── dashboard-variant-2.html (if --variants 2)
+├── dashboard-variant-2.css
+├── dashboard-variant-2-notes.md
+├── auth-variant-1.html
+├── auth-variant-1.css
+├── auth-variant-1-notes.md
+├── design-tokens.css              # CSS custom properties from design-tokens.json
+└── variant-suggestions.md         # Gemini layout rationale (if variants > 1)
+```
+
+### HTML Prototype Example
+```html
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html lang="en">
+<head>
+  <meta charset="UTF-8">
+  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
+  <title>Dashboard - Variant 1</title>
+  <link rel="stylesheet" href="design-tokens.css">
+  <link rel="stylesheet" href="dashboard-variant-1.css">
+</head>
+<body>
+  <header role="banner" class="header">
+    <nav role="navigation" aria-label="Main navigation" class="nav">
+      <!-- Token-based navigation -->
+    </nav>
+  </header>
+  <main role="main" class="main">
+    <section aria-labelledby="dashboard-heading" class="dashboard-section">
+      <h1 id="dashboard-heading" class="heading-primary">Dashboard</h1>
+      <!-- Content using design tokens -->
+    </section>
+  </main>
+  <footer role="contentinfo" class="footer">
+    <!-- Footer content -->
+  </footer>
+</body>
+</html>
+```
+
+### CSS Example
+```css
+/* Design Tokens (auto-generated from design-tokens.json) */
+:root {
+  --color-brand-primary: oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1);
+  --color-surface-background: oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1);
+  --spacing-4: 1rem;
+  --spacing-6: 1.5rem;
+  --font-size-lg: 1.125rem;
+  --border-radius-md: 0.5rem;
+  --shadow-md: 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07);
+}
+
+/* Component Styles (using tokens) */
+.header {
+  background-color: var(--color-surface-elevated);
+  padding: var(--spacing-4) var(--spacing-6);
+  box-shadow: var(--shadow-md);
+}
+
+.heading-primary {
+  font-size: var(--font-size-3xl);
+  color: var(--color-brand-primary);
+  margin-bottom: var(--spacing-6);
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+- **No design tokens found**: Run `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` first
+- **Invalid page names**: List available pages from synthesis-specification.md
+- **Codex generation errors**: Retry with simplified requirements, report warnings
+- **Token reference errors**: Validate all CSS against design-tokens.json
+
+## Quality Checks
+After generation, verify:
+- [ ] All CSS values reference design token custom properties
+- [ ] No hardcoded colors, spacing, or typography
+- [ ] Semantic HTML structure
+- [ ] Accessibility attributes present
+- [ ] Responsive design implemented
+- [ ] Token-driven styling consistent across variants
+
+## Integration Points
+- **Input**: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, synthesis-specification.md
+- **Output**: HTML/CSS prototypes for `/workflow:design:design-update`
+- **Context**: ui-designer/analysis.md for UX guidance
+
+## Next Steps
+After successful generation:
+```
+UI prototypes generated for session: WFS-{session}
+Pages: {page_list}
+Variants per page: {variants_count}
+
+Generated files:
+- {count} HTML prototypes
+- {count} CSS files (token-driven)
+- {count} implementation notes
+
+Review prototypes and select preferred variants:
+Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
+
+Next: /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session}
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/plan.md

@@ -15,13 +15,23 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 4 slash commands in sequence, parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 4 slash commands in sequence, parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution through **automatic continuation**.
 
-**Execution Flow**:
-1. Initialize TodoWrite → Execute Phase 1 → Parse output → Update TodoWrite
-2. Execute Phase 2 with Phase 1 data → Parse output → Update TodoWrite
-3. Execute Phase 3 with Phase 2 data → Parse output → Update TodoWrite
-4. Execute Phase 4 with Phase 3 validation → Update TodoWrite → Return summary
+**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow**:
+
+This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes, reports its output to you, then **immediately and automatically** proceeds to the next phase without requiring any user intervention.
+
+1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:plan "task"`
+2. **Phase 1 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
+3. **Phase 2 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
+4. **Phase 3 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
+5. **Phase 4 executes** → Reports final summary
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status
+- After each phase completion, automatically executes next pending phase
+- **No user action required** - workflow runs end-to-end autonomously
+- Progress updates shown at each phase for visibility
 
 **Execution Modes**:
 - **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate`
@@ -32,9 +42,8 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files, analyze structure, or gather context before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command's output for next phase
-4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 4 completes
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
 
 ## 4-Phase Execution
 
@@ -64,6 +73,8 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
 
+**After Phase 1**: Return to user showing Phase 1 results, then auto-continue to Phase 2
+
 ---
 
 ### Phase 2: Context Gathering
@@ -83,6 +94,8 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
 
+**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3
+
 ---
 
 ### Phase 3: Intelligent Analysis
@@ -99,9 +112,18 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
 
+**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing Phase 3 results, then auto-continue to Phase 4
+
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Task Generation
+
+**Relationship with Brainstorm Phase**:
+- If brainstorm synthesis exists (synthesis-specification.md), Phase 3 analysis incorporates it as input
+- **synthesis-specification.md defines "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, high-level features
+- **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
+- Task generation translates high-level specifications into concrete, actionable work items
+
 **Command**:
 - Manual: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate --session [sessionId]")`
 - Agent: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")`
@@ -227,23 +249,23 @@ Return summary to user
 
 - **Parsing Failure**: If output parsing fails, retry command once, then report error
 - **Validation Failure**: If validation fails, report which file/data is missing
-- **Command Failure**: Keep phase `in_progress`, report error to user, do not proceed
+- **Command Failure**: Keep phase `in_progress`, report error to user, do not proceed to next phase
 
 ## Coordinator Checklist
 
 ✅ **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
 ✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command
 ✅ Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
-✅ Parse session ID from Phase 1 output
+✅ Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
 ✅ Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
-✅ Parse context path from Phase 2 output
+✅ Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
 ✅ Pass session ID and context path to Phase 3 command
 ✅ Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md after Phase 3
 ✅ Select correct Phase 4 command based on --agent flag
 ✅ Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
 ✅ Verify all Phase 4 outputs
 ✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
-✅ Return summary only after Phase 4 completes
+✅ After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
 
 ## Structure Template Reference
 

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-plan.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 5 completes
 6. **TDD Context**: All descriptions include "TDD:" prefix
 
-## 5-Phase Execution
+## 6-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
 **Command**: `/workflow:session:start --auto "TDD: [structured-description]"`
@@ -50,12 +50,36 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 
 **Parse**: Extract contextPath
 
-### Phase 3: TDD Analysis
+### Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis
+**Command**: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]`
+
+**Purpose**: Analyze existing codebase for:
+- Existing test patterns and conventions
+- Current test coverage
+- Related components and integration points
+- Test framework detection
+
+**Parse**: Extract testContextPath (`.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`)
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Makes TDD aware of existing environment
+- Identifies reusable test patterns
+- Prevents duplicate test creation
+- Enables integration with existing tests
+
+### Phase 4: TDD Analysis
 **Command**: `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]`
 
-**Parse**: Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+**Note**: Generates ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with TDD-specific structure:
+- Feature list with testable requirements
+- Test cases for Red phase
+- Implementation requirements for Green phase
+- Refactoring opportunities
+- Task dependencies and execution order
 
-### Phase 4: TDD Task Generation
+**Parse**: Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md contains TDD breakdown sections
+
+### Phase 5: TDD Task Generation
 **Command**:
 - Manual: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]`
 - Agent: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId] --agent`
@@ -63,12 +87,13 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 **Parse**: Extract feature count, chain count, task count
 
 **Validate**:
-- TDD_PLAN.md exists
-- IMPL_PLAN.md exists
+- IMPL_PLAN.md exists (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
 - TEST-*.json, IMPL-*.json, REFACTOR-*.json exist
 - TODO_LIST.md exists
+- IMPL tasks include test-fix-cycle configuration
+- IMPL_PLAN.md contains workflow_type: "tdd" in frontmatter
 
-### Phase 5: TDD Structure Validation
+### Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation
 **Internal validation (no command)**
 
 **Validate**:
@@ -76,6 +101,7 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 2. Dependencies: IMPL depends_on TEST, REFACTOR depends_on IMPL
 3. Meta fields: tdd_phase correct ("red"/"green"/"refactor")
 4. Agents: TEST uses @code-review-test-agent, IMPL/REFACTOR use @code-developer
+5. IMPL tasks contain test-fix-cycle in flow_control for iterative Green phase
 
 **Return Summary**:
 ```
@@ -89,9 +115,9 @@ Structure:
 - Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
 [...]
 
-Plans:
-- TDD Structure: .workflow/[sessionId]/TDD_PLAN.md
-- Implementation: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+Plan:
+- Unified Implementation Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+  (includes TDD Task Chains section)
 
 Next: /workflow:execute or /workflow:tdd-verify
 ```
@@ -99,13 +125,14 @@ Next: /workflow:execute or /workflow:tdd-verify
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
 ```javascript
-// Initialize
+// Initialize (6 phases now)
 [
-  {content: "Execute session discovery", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "..."},
-  {content: "Execute context gathering", status: "pending", activeForm: "..."},
-  {content: "Execute TDD analysis", status: "pending", activeForm: "..."},
-  {content: "Execute TDD task generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "..."},
-  {content: "Validate TDD structure", status: "pending", activeForm: "..."}
+  {content: "Execute session discovery", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing session discovery"},
+  {content: "Execute context gathering", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing context gathering"},
+  {content: "Execute test coverage analysis", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {content: "Execute TDD analysis", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing TDD analysis"},
+  {content: "Execute TDD task generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {content: "Validate TDD structure", status: "pending", activeForm: "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 
 // Update after each phase: mark current "completed", next "in_progress"
@@ -131,3 +158,96 @@ Convert user input to TDD-structured format:
 - `/workflow:execute` - Execute TDD tasks
 - `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Verify TDD compliance
 - `/workflow:status` - View progress
+## TDD Workflow Enhancements
+
+### Overview
+The TDD workflow has been significantly enhanced by integrating best practices from both traditional `plan --agent` and `test-gen` workflows, creating a hybrid approach that bridges the gap between idealized TDD and real-world development complexity.
+
+### Key Improvements
+
+#### 1. Test Coverage Analysis (Phase 3)
+**Adopted from test-gen workflow**
+
+Before planning TDD tasks, the workflow now analyzes the existing codebase:
+- Detects existing test patterns and conventions
+- Identifies current test coverage
+- Discovers related components and integration points
+- Detects test framework automatically
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Context-aware TDD planning
+- Avoids duplicate test creation
+- Enables integration with existing tests
+- No longer assumes greenfield scenarios
+
+#### 2. Iterative Green Phase with Test-Fix Cycle
+**Adopted from test-gen workflow**
+
+IMPL (Green phase) tasks now include automatic test-fix cycle for resilient implementation:
+
+**Enhanced IMPL Task Flow**:
+```
+1. Write minimal implementation code
+2. Execute test suite
+3. IF tests pass → Complete task ✅
+4. IF tests fail → Enter fix cycle:
+   a. Gemini diagnoses with bug-fix template
+   b. Apply fix (manual or Codex)
+   c. Retest
+   d. Repeat (max 3 iterations)
+5. IF max iterations → Auto-revert changes 🔄
+```
+
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Faster feedback within Green phase
+- ✅ Autonomous recovery from implementation errors
+- ✅ Systematic debugging with Gemini
+- ✅ Safe rollback prevents broken state
+
+#### 3. Agent-Driven Planning
+**From plan --agent workflow**
+
+Supports action-planning-agent for more autonomous TDD planning with:
+- MCP tool integration (code-index, exa)
+- Memory-first principles
+- Brainstorming artifact integration
+- Task merging over decomposition
+
+### Workflow Comparison
+
+| Aspect | Previous | Current |
+|--------|----------|---------|
+| **Phases** | 5 | 6 (test coverage analysis) |
+| **Context** | Greenfield assumption | Existing codebase aware |
+| **Green Phase** | Single implementation | Iterative with fix cycle |
+| **Failure Handling** | Manual intervention | Auto-diagnose + fix + revert |
+| **Test Analysis** | None | Deep coverage analysis |
+| **Feedback Loop** | Post-execution | During Green phase |
+
+### Migration Notes
+
+**Backward Compatibility**: ✅ Fully compatible
+- Existing TDD workflows continue to work
+- New features are additive, not breaking
+- Phase 3 can be skipped if test-context-gather not available
+
+**Session Structure**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-xxx/
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .process/
+│   ├── context-package.json
+│   ├── test-context-package.json
+│   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (enhanced with TDD breakdown)
+│   └── green-fix-iteration-*.md (fix logs)
+└── .task/
+    ├── TEST-*.json (Red phase)
+    ├── IMPL-*.json (Green phase with test-fix-cycle)
+    └── REFACTOR-*.json (Refactor phase)
+```
+
+**Configuration Options** (in IMPL tasks):
+- `meta.max_iterations`: Fix attempts (default: 3)
+- `meta.use_codex`: Auto-fix mode (default: false)
+

.claude/commands/workflow/test-gen.md

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: test-gen
 description: Create independent test-fix workflow session by analyzing completed implementation
-usage: /workflow:test-gen <source-session-id>
-argument-hint: "<source-session-id>"
+usage: /workflow:test-gen [--use-codex] <source-session-id>
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] <source-session-id>"
 examples:
   - /workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
-  - /workflow:test-gen WFS-api-refactor
+  - /workflow:test-gen --use-codex WFS-api-refactor
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - **Context-First**: Prioritizes gathering code changes and summaries from source session
 - **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` task, using `meta.type: "test-fix"` for agent assignment
 - **Parameter Simplification**: Tools auto-detect test session type via metadata, no manual cross-session parameters needed
+- **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` flag for automated Codex fix application
 
 **Execution Flow**:
 1. Initialize TodoWrite → Create test session → Parse session ID
@@ -36,8 +37,9 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 4 completes (execution triggered separately)
 6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
 7. **Automatic Detection**: context-gather auto-detects test session and gathers source session context
+8. **Parse --use-codex Flag**: Extract flag from arguments and pass to Phase 4 (test-task-generate)
 
-## 4-Phase Execution
+## 5-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Create Test Session
 **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]\"")`
@@ -65,107 +67,117 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 2: Gather Cross-Session Context
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
+### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
 
 **Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1 (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
 
-**Automatic Detection**:
-- context-gather reads `.workflow/[testSessionId]/workflow-session.json`
-- Detects `workflow_type: "test_session"`
-- Automatically uses `source_session_id` to gather source session context
-- No need for manual `--source-session` parameter
-
-**Cross-Session Context Collection** (Automatic):
-- Implementation summaries: `.workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md`
-- Code changes: `git log --since=[source_session_created_at]` for changed files
-- Original plan: `.workflow/[sourceSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md`
-- Test files: Discovered via MCP code-index tools
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Load source session implementation context and summaries
+- Analyze test coverage using MCP tools (find existing tests)
+- Identify files requiring tests (coverage gaps)
+- Detect test framework and conventions
+- Generate `test-context-package.json`
 
 **Parse Output**:
-- Extract: context package path (store as `contextPath`)
-- Pattern: `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/context-package.json`
+- Extract: test context package path (store as `testContextPath`)
+- Pattern: `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`
 
 **Validation**:
-- Context package created in test session directory
-- Contains source session artifacts (summaries, changed files)
-- Includes test file inventory
+- Test context package created
+- Contains source session summaries
+- Includes coverage gap analysis
+- Test framework detected
+- Test conventions documented
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 3: Implementation Analysis
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [testContextPath]")`
 
 **Input**:
-- `testSessionId` from Phase 1 (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
-- `contextPath` from Phase 2 (e.g., `.workflow/WFS-test-user-auth/.process/context-package.json`)
-
-**Analysis Focus**:
-- Review implementation summaries from source session
-- Identify test files and coverage gaps
-- Assess test execution strategy (unit, integration, e2e)
-- Determine failure diagnosis approach
-- Recommend code quality improvements
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `testContextPath` from Phase 2
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
-- Reads context-package.json with cross-session artifacts
-- Executes parallel analysis (Gemini for test strategy, optional Codex for validation)
-- Generates comprehensive test execution strategy
-- Identifies code modification targets for test fixes
-- Provides feasibility assessment for test validation
+- Use Gemini to analyze coverage gaps and implementation context
+- Study existing test patterns and conventions
+- Generate test requirements for each missing test file
+- Design test generation strategy
+- Generate `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
 
 **Parse Output**:
-- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` created
-- Contains test strategy and execution plan
-- Lists code modification targets (format: `file:function:lines` or `file`)
-- Includes risk assessment and optimization recommendations
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` created
+- Contains test requirements and generation strategy
+- Lists test files to create with specifications
 
 **Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` exists
-- Contains complete analysis sections:
-  - Current State Analysis (test coverage, existing tests)
-  - Proposed Solution Design (test execution strategy)
-  - Implementation Strategy (code targets, feasibility)
-  - Solution Optimization (performance, quality)
-  - Critical Success Factors (acceptance criteria)
+- TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md exists with complete sections:
+  - Coverage Assessment
+  - Test Framework & Conventions
+  - Test Requirements by File
+  - Test Generation Strategy
+  - Implementation Targets (test files to create)
+  - Success Criteria
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 4: Generate Test Task
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate --session [testSessionId]")`
+### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session [testSessionId]")`
 
-**Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `--use-codex` flag (if present in original command)
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
-- Reads ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3
-- Extracts test strategy and code modification targets
-- Generates `IMPL-001.json` (reusing standard format) with:
-  - `meta.type: "test-fix"` (enables @test-fix-agent assignment)
-  - `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
-  - `context.requirements`: Test execution requirements from analysis
-  - `context.focus_paths`: Test files and source files from analysis
-  - `context.acceptance`: All tests pass criteria
-  - `flow_control.pre_analysis`: Load source session summaries
-  - `flow_control.implementation_approach`: Test execution strategy from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-  - `flow_control.target_files`: Code modification targets from analysis
+- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3
+- Extract test requirements and generation strategy
+- Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
+  - **IMPL-001.json**: Test Generation task (calls @code-developer)
+  - **IMPL-002.json**: Test Execution and Fix Cycle task (calls @test-fix-agent)
+- Generate IMPL_PLAN.md with test generation and execution strategy
+- Generate TODO_LIST.md with both tasks
 
 **Parse Output**:
-- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.json` exists
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.json` exists (test generation)
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-002.json` exists (test execution & fix)
 - Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` created
 - Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` created
 
-**Validation**:
-- Task JSON has `id: "IMPL-001"` and `meta.type: "test-fix"`
-- IMPL_PLAN.md contains test validation strategy from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- TODO_LIST.md shows IMPL-001 task
-- flow_control includes code targets and test strategy
-- Task is ready for /workflow:execute
+**Validation - IMPL-001.json (Test Generation)**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-001`
+- `meta.type: "test-gen"`
+- `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+- `context.requirements`: Generate tests based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- `flow_control.pre_analysis`: Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and test context
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach`: Test generation steps
+- `flow_control.target_files`: Test files to create from analysis section 5
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+**Validation - IMPL-002.json (Test Execution & Fix)**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-002`
+- `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `meta.use_codex: true|false` (based on --use-codex flag)
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
+  - **Cycle pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if --use-codex) → retest
+  - **Tools configuration**: Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template, manual or Codex for fixes
+  - **Exit conditions**: Success (all pass) or failure (max iterations)
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase execution flow
+  - Phase 1: Initial test execution
+  - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes (based on flag)
+  - Phase 3: Final validation and certification
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed, phase 5 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Return Summary to User
 
 **Return to User**:
 ```
@@ -173,315 +185,120 @@ Independent test-fix workflow created successfully!
 
 Source Session: [sourceSessionId]
 Test Session: [testSessionId]
-Task Created: IMPL-001 (test-fix)
+
+Tasks Created:
+- IMPL-001: Test Generation (@code-developer)
+- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
+
+Test Framework: [detected framework]
+Test Files to Generate: [count]
+Max Fix Iterations: 5
+Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated] (based on --use-codex flag)
 
 Next Steps:
 1. Review test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
-2. Execute validation: /workflow:execute
+2. Execute workflow: /workflow:execute
 3. Monitor progress: /workflow:status
-
-The @test-fix-agent will:
-- Execute all tests
-- Diagnose any failures
-- Fix code until tests pass
 ```
 
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
+
 ---
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
+Track progress through 5 phases:
+
 ```javascript
-// Initialize (before Phase 1)
 TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather cross-session context", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Gathering cross-session context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze implementation for test strategy", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing implementation"},
-  {"content": "Generate test validation task", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test validation task"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather cross-session context", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering cross-session context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze implementation for test strategy", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing implementation"},
-  {"content": "Generate test validation task", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test validation task"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 2
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather cross-session context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering cross-session context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze implementation for test strategy", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing implementation"},
-  {"content": "Generate test validation task", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test validation task"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 3
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather cross-session context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering cross-session context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze implementation for test strategy", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing implementation"},
-  {"content": "Generate test validation task", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating test validation task"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 4
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather cross-session context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering cross-session context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze implementation for test strategy", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing implementation"},
-  {"content": "Generate test validation task", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating test validation task"}
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
 ]})
 ```
 
+Update status to `in_progress` when starting each phase, mark `completed` when done.
+
 ## Data Flow
 
 ```
-User: /workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
-    ↓
-Phase 1: session-start --new "Test validation for WFS-user-auth"
-    ↓ Creates: WFS-test-user-auth session
-    ↓ Writes: workflow-session.json with workflow_type="test_session", source_session_id="WFS-user-auth"
-    ↓ Output: testSessionId = "WFS-test-user-auth"
-    ↓
-Phase 2: context-gather --session WFS-test-user-auth
-    ↓ Auto-detects: test session type from workflow-session.json
-    ↓ Auto-reads: source_session_id = "WFS-user-auth"
-    ↓ Gathers: Cross-session context (summaries, code changes, tests)
-    ↓ Output: .workflow/WFS-test-user-auth/.process/context-package.json
-    ↓
-Phase 3: concept-enhanced --session WFS-test-user-auth --context context-package.json
-    ↓ Reads: context-package.json with cross-session artifacts
-    ↓ Executes: Parallel analysis (Gemini test strategy + optional Codex validation)
-    ↓ Analyzes: Test coverage, execution strategy, code targets
-    ↓ Output: .workflow/WFS-test-user-auth/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-    ↓
-Phase 4: task-generate --session WFS-test-user-auth
-    ↓ Reads: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with test strategy and code targets
-    ↓ Generates: IMPL-001.json with meta.type="test-fix"
-    ↓ Output: Task, plan, and todo files in test session
-    ↓
-Return: Summary with next steps (user triggers /workflow:execute separately)
+/workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
+  ↓
+Phase 1: session-start → WFS-test-user-auth
+  ↓
+Phase 2: test-context-gather → test-context-package.json
+  ↓
+Phase 3: test-concept-enhanced → TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+  ↓
+Phase 4: test-task-generate → IMPL-001.json + IMPL-002.json
+  ↓
+Phase 5: Return summary
+  ↓
+/workflow:execute → IMPL-001 (@code-developer) → IMPL-002 (@test-fix-agent)
 ```
 
-## Session Metadata Design
+## Session Metadata
 
-**Test Session (`WFS-test-user-auth/workflow-session.json`)**:
-```json
-{
-  "session_id": "WFS-test-user-auth",
-  "project": "Test validation for user authentication implementation",
-  "status": "planning",
-  "created_at": "2025-10-03T12:00:00Z",
-  "workflow_type": "test_session",
-  "source_session_id": "WFS-user-auth"
-}
-```
+Test session includes `workflow_type: "test_session"` and `source_session_id` for automatic context gathering.
 
-## Automatic Cross-Session Context Collection
+## Task Output
 
-When `context-gather` detects `workflow_type: "test_session"`:
+Generates two tasks:
+- **IMPL-001** (@code-developer): Test generation from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- **IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent): Test execution with iterative fix cycle (max 5 iterations)
 
-**Collected from Source Session** (`.workflow/WFS-user-auth/`):
-- Implementation summaries: `.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md`
-- Code changes: `git log --since=[source_created_at] --name-only`
-- Original plan: `IMPL_PLAN.md`
-- Task definitions: `.task/IMPL-*.json`
-
-**Collected from Current Project**:
-- Test files: `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")`
-- Test configuration: `package.json`, `jest.config.js`, etc.
-- Source files: Based on changed files from git log
-
-## Task Generation Output
-
-task-generate creates `IMPL-001.json` (reusing standard format) with:
-
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Execute and validate tests for [sourceSessionId]",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "test-fix",
-    "agent": "@test-fix-agent"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Execute complete test suite for all implemented modules",
-      "Diagnose and fix any test failures",
-      "Ensure all tests pass before completion"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/**/*.test.ts", "src/**/implementation.ts"],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "All tests pass successfully",
-      "No test failures or errors",
-      "Code is approved and ready for deployment"
-    ],
-    "depends_on": [],
-    "artifacts": []
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_source_session_summaries",
-        "action": "Load implementation summaries from source session",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(find .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/ -name 'IMPL-*-summary.md' 2>/dev/null)",
-          "Read(.workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "implementation_context",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_test_files",
-        "action": "Identify test files and coverage",
-        "commands": [
-          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
-          "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"test|describe|it\", file_pattern=\"*.test.*\")"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "test_inventory",
-        "on_error": "fail"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Execute tests and fix failures until all pass",
-      "modification_points": [
-        "Run test suite using detected framework",
-        "Parse test output to identify failures",
-        "Diagnose root cause of failures",
-        "Modify source code to fix issues",
-        "Re-run tests to verify fixes"
-      ],
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load implementation context",
-        "Identify test framework and configuration",
-        "Execute complete test suite",
-        "If failures: analyze error messages",
-        "Fix source code based on diagnosis",
-        "Re-run tests",
-        "Repeat until all tests pass"
-      ]
-    },
-    "target_files": ["src/**/*.test.ts", "src/**/implementation.ts"]
-  }
-}
-```
+See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete task JSON schemas.
 
 ## Error Handling
 
-### Phase 1 Failures
-- **Source session not found**: Return error "Source session [sourceSessionId] not found in .workflow/"
-- **Invalid source session**: Return error "Source session [sourceSessionId] has no completed IMPL tasks"
-- **Session creation failed**: Return error "Could not create test session. Check /workflow:session:start"
+| Phase | Error | Action |
+|-------|-------|--------|
+| 1 | Source session not found | Return error with source session ID |
+| 1 | No completed IMPL tasks | Return error, source incomplete |
+| 2 | Context gathering failed | Return error, check source artifacts |
+| 3 | Analysis failed | Return error, check context package |
+| 4 | Task generation failed | Retry once, then error with details |
 
-### Phase 2 Failures
-- **Context gathering failed**: Return error "Could not gather cross-session context. Check source session artifacts"
-- **No source artifacts**: Return error "Source session has no implementation summaries or git history"
+## Output Files
 
-### Phase 3 Failures
-- **Analysis failed**: Return error "Implementation analysis failed. Check context package and ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md"
-- **No test strategy**: Return error "Could not determine test execution strategy from analysis"
-- **Missing code targets**: Warning only, proceed with general test task
-
-### Phase 4 Failures
-- **Task generation failed**: Retry once, then return error with details
-- **Invalid task structure**: Return error with JSON validation details
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-### Complete Flow Example
-```
-1. Implementation Phase (prior to test-gen)
-   /workflow:plan "Build auth system"
-   → Creates WFS-auth session
-   → @code-developer implements + writes tests
-   → Creates IMPL-001-summary.md in WFS-auth
-
-2. Test Generation Phase (test-gen)
-   /workflow:test-gen WFS-auth
-   Phase 1: session-start → Creates WFS-test-auth session
-   Phase 2: context-gather → Gathers from WFS-auth, creates context-package.json
-   Phase 3: concept-enhanced → Analyzes implementation, creates ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-   Phase 4: task-generate → Creates IMPL-001.json with meta.type="test-fix"
-   Returns: Summary with next steps
-
-3. Test Execution Phase (user-triggered)
-   /workflow:execute
-   → Detects active session: WFS-test-auth
-   → @test-fix-agent picks up IMPL-001 (test-fix type)
-   → Runs test suite
-   → Diagnoses failures (if any)
-   → Fixes source code
-   → Re-runs tests
-   → All pass → Code approved ✅
-```
-
-### Output Files Created
-
-**In Test Session** (`.workflow/WFS-test-auth/`):
-- `workflow-session.json` - Contains workflow_type and source_session_id
-- `.process/context-package.json` - Cross-session context from WFS-auth
-- `.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - Test strategy and code targets from concept-enhanced
-- `.task/IMPL-001.json` - Test-fix task definition
-- `IMPL_PLAN.md` - Test validation plan (from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
+Created in `.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/`:
+- `workflow-session.json` - Session metadata
+- `.process/test-context-package.json` - Coverage analysis
+- `.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - Test requirements
+- `.task/IMPL-001.json` - Test generation task
+- `.task/IMPL-002.json` - Test execution & fix task
+- `IMPL_PLAN.md` - Test plan
 - `TODO_LIST.md` - Task checklist
-- `.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md` - Created by @test-fix-agent after completion
+
+## Agent Execution
+
+**IMPL-001** (@code-developer):
+- Generates test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- Follows existing test patterns and conventions
+
+**IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent):
+1. Run test suite
+2. Iterative fix cycle (max 5):
+   - Gemini diagnosis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
+   - Manual fix application (default) OR Codex applies fixes if --use-codex flag (resume mechanism)
+   - Retest and check regressions
+3. Final validation and certification
+
+See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for detailed specifications.
 
 ## Best Practices
 
-1. **Run after implementation complete**: Ensure source session has completed IMPL tasks and summaries
-2. **Check git commits**: Implementation changes should be committed for accurate git log analysis
-3. **Verify test files exist**: Source implementation should include test files
-4. **Independent sessions**: Test session is separate from implementation session for clean separation
-5. **Monitor execution**: Use `/workflow:status` to track test-fix progress after /workflow:execute
-
-## Coordinator Checklist
-
-✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command (4 phases)
-✅ Phase 1: Create test session with source session ID
-✅ Parse new test session ID from Phase 1 output
-✅ Phase 2: Run context-gather (auto-detects test session, no extra params)
-✅ Verify context-package.json contains cross-session artifacts
-✅ Phase 3: Run concept-enhanced with session and context path
-✅ Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md contains test strategy and code targets
-✅ Phase 4: Run task-generate to create IMPL-001.json
-✅ Verify task has meta.type="test-fix" and meta.agent="@test-fix-agent"
-✅ Verify flow_control includes analysis insights and code targets
-✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
-✅ Return summary after Phase 4 (execution is separate user action)
-
-## Required Tool Modifications
-
-### `/workflow:session:start`
-- Support `--new` flag for test session creation
-- Auto-detect test session pattern from task description
-- Write `workflow_type: "test_session"` and `source_session_id` to metadata
-
-### `/workflow:tools:context-gather`
-- Read session metadata to detect `workflow_type: "test_session"`
-- Auto-extract `source_session_id` from metadata
-- Gather cross-session context from source session artifacts
-- Include git log analysis from source session creation time
-
-### `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced`
-- No changes required (already supports cross-session context analysis)
-- Will automatically analyze test strategy based on context-package.json
-- Generates ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with code targets and test execution plan
-
-### `/workflow:tools:task-generate`
-- Recognize test session context and generate appropriate task
-- Create `IMPL-001.json` with `meta.type: "test-fix"`
-- Extract test strategy from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- Include code targets and cross-session references in flow_control
-
-### `/workflow:execute`
-- No changes required (already dispatches by meta.agent)
+1. Run after implementation complete (ensure source session has summaries)
+2. Commit implementation changes before test-gen
+3. Monitor execution with `/workflow:status`
+4. Review iteration logs in `.process/fix-iteration-*`
 
 ## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Create implementation workflow (run before test-gen)
-- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1 tool for test session creation
-- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2 tool for cross-session context collection
-- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Phase 3 tool for implementation analysis and test strategy
-- `/workflow:tools:task-generate` - Phase 4 tool for test task creation
-- `/workflow:execute` - Execute test-fix workflow (user-triggered after test-gen)
-- `/workflow:status` - Check workflow progress
-- `@test-fix-agent` - Agent that executes and fixes tests
+
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (coverage analysis)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3 (Gemini test analysis)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4 (task generation)
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute workflow
+- `/workflow:status` - Check progress

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/concept-enhanced.md

@@ -130,6 +130,15 @@ Advanced solution design and feasibility analysis engine with parallel CLI execu
      - Tech stack from tech_stack section
      - Project structure from statistics section
 
+     **ANALYSIS PRIORITY - Use ALL source documents from context-package assets[]**:
+     1. PRIMARY SOURCES (Highest Priority): Individual role analysis.md files (system-architect, ui-designer, product-manager, etc.)
+        - These contain complete technical details, design rationale, ADRs, and decision context
+        - Extract: Technical specs, API schemas, design tokens, caching configs, performance metrics
+     2. SYNTHESIS REFERENCE (Medium Priority): synthesis-specification.md
+        - Use for integrated requirements and cross-role alignment
+        - Validate decisions and identify integration points
+     3. TOPIC FRAMEWORK (Low Priority): topic-framework.md for discussion context
+
      EXPECTED:
      1. CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS: Existing patterns, code structure, integration points, technical debt
      2. SOLUTION DESIGN: Core architecture principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/docs.md

@@ -1,256 +1,590 @@
 ---
 name: docs
-description: Generate hierarchical architecture and API documentation using doc-generator agent with flow_control
-usage: /workflow:docs <type> [scope]
-argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all"
+description: Documentation planning and orchestration - creates structured documentation tasks for execution
+usage: /workflow:docs <type> [options]
+argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all" [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
 examples:
-  - /workflow:docs all
-  - /workflow:docs architecture src/modules
-  - /workflow:docs api --scope api/
+  - /workflow:docs all                          # Complete documentation (gemini default)
+  - /workflow:docs all --tool qwen              # Use Qwen for architecture focus
+  - /workflow:docs architecture --scope src/modules
+  - /workflow:docs api --tool gemini --scope api/
 ---
 
 # Workflow Documentation Command
 
+## Purpose
+
+**`/workflow:docs` is a pure planner/orchestrator** - it analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. It does **NOT** generate any documentation content itself.
+
+**Key Principle**: Separation of Concerns
+- **docs.md** → Planning, session creation, task generation
+- **doc-generator.md** → Execution, content generation, quality assurance
+
 ## Usage
+
 ```bash
-/workflow:docs <type> [scope]
+/workflow:docs <type> [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
 ```
 
-## Input Detection
-- **Document Types**: `architecture`, `api`, `all` → Creates appropriate documentation tasks
-- **Scope**: Optional module/directory filtering → Focuses documentation generation
-- **Default**: `all` → Complete documentation suite
+### Parameters
 
-## Core Workflow
+- **type**: `architecture` | `api` | `all` (required)
+  - `architecture`: System design, module interactions, patterns
+  - `api`: Endpoint documentation, API specifications
+  - `all`: Complete documentation suite
 
-### Planning & Task Creation Process
-The command performs structured planning and task creation:
+- **--tool**: `gemini` | `qwen` | `codex` (optional, default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
 
-**0. Pre-Planning Architecture Analysis** ⚠️ MANDATORY FIRST STEP
-- **System Structure Analysis**: MUST run `bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)` for dynamic task decomposition
-- **Module Boundary Identification**: Understand module organization and dependencies
-- **Architecture Pattern Recognition**: Identify architectural styles and design patterns
-- **Foundation for documentation**: Use structure analysis to guide task decomposition
+- **--scope**: Directory path filter (optional)
 
-**1. Documentation Planning**
-- **Type Analysis**: Determine documentation scope (architecture/api/all)
-- **Module Discovery**: Use architecture analysis results to identify components
-- **Dynamic Task Decomposition**: Analyze project structure to determine optimal task count and module grouping
-- **Session Management**: Create or use existing documentation session
+## Planning Workflow
 
-**2. Task Generation**
-- **Create session**: `.workflow/WFS-docs-[timestamp]/`
-- **Create active marker**: `.workflow/.active-WFS-docs-[timestamp]` (must match session folder name)
-- **Generate IMPL_PLAN.md**: Documentation requirements and task breakdown
-- **Create task.json files**: Individual documentation tasks with flow_control
-- **Setup TODO_LIST.md**: Progress tracking for documentation generation
+### Complete Execution Flow
 
-### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **Check for active sessions**: Look for `.workflow/.active-WFS-docs-*` markers
-- **Marker naming**: Active marker must exactly match session folder name
-- **Session creation**: `WFS-docs-[timestamp]` folder with matching `.active-WFS-docs-[timestamp]` marker
-- **Task execution**: Use `/workflow:execute` to run individual documentation tasks within active session
-- **Session isolation**: Each documentation session maintains independent context and state
+```
+/workflow:docs [type] [--tool] [--scope]
+    ↓
+Phase 1: Init Session → Create session dir & active marker
+    ↓
+Phase 2: Module Analysis → Run get_modules_by_depth.sh
+    ↓
+Phase 3: Quick Assess → Check existing docs
+    ↓
+Phase 4: Decompose → Create task list & TodoWrite
+    ↓
+Phase 5: Generate Tasks → Build IMPL-*.json & plans
+    ↓
+✅ Planning Complete → Show TodoWrite status
+```
 
-## Output Structure
+### Phase Details
+
+#### Phase 1: Session Initialization
+```bash
+# Parse arguments and create session structure
+doc_type="all"  # architecture|api|all
+tool="gemini"   # gemini|qwen|codex (default: gemini)
+scope=""        # optional path filter
+
+timestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+session_dir=".workflow/WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
+mkdir -p "${session_dir}"/{.task,.process,.summaries}
+touch ".workflow/.active-WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
+```
+
+#### Phase 2: Project Structure Analysis (MANDATORY)
+```bash
+# Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for module hierarchy
+module_data=$(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+# Format: depth:N|path:<PATH>|files:N|size:N|has_claude:yes/no
+```
+
+#### Phase 3: Quick Documentation Assessment
+```bash
+# Lightweight check - no heavy analysis
+existing_docs=$(find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.md" -not -path "./.workflow/*" | wc -l)
+
+if [[ $existing_docs -gt 5 ]]; then
+    find . -maxdepth 3 -name "*.md" > "${session_dir}/.process/existing-docs.txt"
+fi
+
+# Record strategy
+cat > "${session_dir}/.process/strategy.md" <<EOF
+**Type**: ${doc_type}
+**Tool**: ${tool}
+**Scope**: ${scope:-"Full project"}
+EOF
+```
+
+#### Phase 4: Task Decomposition & TodoWrite Setup
+
+**Decomposition Strategy**:
+1. **Always create**: System Overview task (IMPL-001)
+2. **If architecture/all**: Architecture Documentation task
+3. **If api/all**: Unified API Documentation task
+4. **For each module**: Module Documentation task (grouped)
+
+**Grouping Rules**:
+- Max 3 modules per task
+- Max 30 files per task
+- Group by dependency depth and functional similarity
+
+**TodoWrite Setup**:
+```
+✅ Session initialization (completed)
+⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-003: Module 'api' (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-004: Architecture Documentation (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-005: API Documentation (pending)
+```
+
+#### Phase 5: Task JSON Generation
+
+Each task follows the 5-field schema with detailed flow_control.
+
+**Command Generation Logic**:
+```bash
+# Build tool-specific command at planning time
+if [[ "$tool" == "codex" ]]; then
+    cmd="codex -C ${dir} --full-auto exec \"...\""
+else
+    cmd="bash(cd ${dir} && ~/.claude/scripts/${tool}-wrapper -p \"...\")"
+fi
+```
+
+## Task Templates
+
+### 1. System Overview (IMPL-001)
+**Purpose**: Project-level documentation
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/README.md`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Generate Project Overview Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "project-overview"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document project purpose, architecture, and getting started guide",
+      "Create navigation structure for all documentation",
+      "Use Project-Level Documentation Template"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["."],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete .workflow/docs/README.md following template",
+      "All template sections populated with accurate information",
+      "Navigation links to module and API documentation"
+    ],
+    "scope": "Project root and overall structure"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "discover_project_structure",
+        "action": "Analyze project structure and modules",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
+        "output_to": "system_structure"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "discover_project_files",
+        "action": "Identify key project files",
+        "command": "bash(find . -maxdepth 2 -type f \\( -name '*.json' -o -name '*.md' -o -name '*.yml' -o -name '*.yaml' \\) | head -30)",
+        "output_to": "project_files"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_tech_stack",
+        "action": "Analyze technology stack and dependencies",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project technology stack\\nTASK: Extract tech stack, architecture patterns, design principles\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: System structure: [system_structure]\\n         Project files: [project_files]\\nEXPECTED: Technology analysis with architecture style\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt)\")",
+        "output_to": "tech_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Command is built at planning time based on $tool variable (gemini/qwen/codex)"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Use tech_analysis to populate Project-Level Documentation Template",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt",
+        "Parse tech_analysis for: purpose, architecture, tech stack, design principles",
+        "Fill template sections with extracted information",
+        "Generate navigation links to module/API docs",
+        "Format output as Markdown"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Module Documentation (IMPL-002+)
+**Purpose**: Module-level documentation
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/modules/[name]/README.md`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-002",
+  "title": "Document Module: 'auth'",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "module-documentation"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document module purpose, internal architecture, public API",
+      "Include dependencies and usage examples",
+      "Use Module-Level Documentation Template"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete .workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md",
+      "All exported functions/classes documented",
+      "Working code examples included"
+    ],
+    "scope": "auth module only"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_system_context",
+        "action": "Load system architecture from IMPL-001",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL-001-system_structure.output 2>/dev/null || ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
+        "output_to": "system_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_module_structure",
+        "action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
+        "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}\\n         System: [system_context]\\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+        "output_to": "module_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "For qwen: qwen-wrapper | For codex: codex -C src/auth --full-auto exec \"...\" --skip-git-repo-check"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Use module_analysis to populate Module-Level Documentation Template",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt",
+        "Parse module_analysis for: purpose, components, API, dependencies",
+        "Fill template sections with extracted information",
+        "Generate code examples from actual usage",
+        "Format output as Markdown"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### 3. Architecture Documentation (if requested)
+**Purpose**: System design and patterns
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/architecture/`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N-1",
+  "title": "Generate Architecture Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "qwen",
+    "template": "architecture"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document system design patterns and architectural decisions",
+      "Create module interaction diagrams",
+      "Explain data flow and component relationships"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["."],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete architecture documentation in .workflow/docs/architecture/",
+      "Diagrams explaining system design",
+      "Clear explanation of architectural patterns"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_all_module_docs",
+        "action": "Aggregate all module documentation",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/modules -name 'README.md' -exec cat {} \\;)",
+        "output_to": "module_docs",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_architecture",
+        "action": "Synthesize system architecture from modules",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Synthesize system architecture\\nTASK: Create architecture documentation from module docs\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture documentation with patterns\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt) | Focus on design patterns, data flow, component interactions\")",
+        "output_to": "architecture_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Command varies: gemini-wrapper (default) | qwen-wrapper | codex exec"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Create architecture documentation from synthesis",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Parse architecture_analysis for patterns and design decisions",
+        "Create text-based diagrams (mermaid/ASCII) for module interactions",
+        "Document data flow between components",
+        "Explain architectural decisions and trade-offs",
+        "Format as structured documentation"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/architecture/system-design.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/architecture/module-map.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/architecture/data-flow.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### 4. API Documentation (if requested)
+**Purpose**: API reference and specifications
+**Output**: `.workflow/docs/api/README.md`
+
+**Complete JSON Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-N",
+  "title": "Generate Unified API Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "api-reference"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document all API endpoints with request/response formats",
+      "Include authentication and error handling",
+      "Generate OpenAPI specification if applicable",
+      "Use API-Level Documentation Template"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/api", "src/routes", "src/controllers"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Complete .workflow/docs/api/README.md following template",
+      "All endpoints documented with examples",
+      "OpenAPI spec generated if REST API detected"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "discover_api_endpoints",
+        "action": "Find all API routes and endpoints",
+        "command": "bash(rg -t ts -t js '(router\\.|app\\.|@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch))' src/ --no-heading | head -100)",
+        "output_to": "endpoint_discovery",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_api_structure",
+        "action": "Analyze API structure and patterns",
+        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document API comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract endpoints, auth, request/response formats\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*,src/routes/**/*,src/controllers/**/*}\\n         Endpoints: [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: Complete API documentation\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt)\")",
+        "output_to": "api_analysis",
+        "on_error": "fail",
+        "note": "Tool-specific: gemini-wrapper | qwen-wrapper | codex -C src/api exec"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Use api_analysis to populate API-Level Documentation Template",
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt",
+        "Parse api_analysis for: endpoints, auth, request/response",
+        "Fill template sections with extracted information",
+        "Generate OpenAPI spec if REST API detected",
+        "Format output as Markdown"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/api/README.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/api/openapi.yaml"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Planning Outputs
+
+### File Structure
+```
+.workflow/
+├── .active-WFS-docs-20240120-143022
+└── WFS-docs-20240120-143022/
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Implementation plan
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracker
+    ├── .process/
+    │   ├── strategy.md           # Doc strategy
+    │   └── existing-docs.txt     # Existing docs list
+    └── .task/
+        ├── IMPL-001.json         # System overview
+        ├── IMPL-002.json         # Module: auth
+        ├── IMPL-003.json         # Module: api
+        ├── IMPL-004.json         # Architecture
+        └── IMPL-005.json         # API docs
+```
+
+### IMPL_PLAN.md
+```markdown
+# Documentation Implementation Plan
+
+**Session**: WFS-docs-[timestamp]
+**Type**: [architecture|api|all]
+**Tool**: [gemini|qwen|codex]
+
+## Task Breakdown
+
+### IMPL-001: System Overview
+- **Output**: .workflow/docs/README.md
+- **Template**: project-overview.txt
+
+### IMPL-002+: Module Documentation
+- **Modules**: [list]
+- **Template**: module-documentation.txt
+
+### IMPL-N: Architecture/API (if requested)
+- **Template**: architecture.txt / api-reference.txt
+
+## Execution Order
+1. IMPL-001 (Foundation)
+2. IMPL-002 to IMPL-[M] (Modules - can parallelize)
+3. IMPL-[M+1] (Architecture - needs modules)
+4. IMPL-[N] (API - can run after IMPL-001)
+```
+
+### TODO_LIST.md
+```markdown
+# Documentation Progress Tracker
+
+- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Generate Project Overview
+- [ ] **IMPL-002**: Document Module: 'auth'
+- [ ] **IMPL-003**: Document Module: 'api'
+- [ ] **IMPL-004**: Generate Architecture Documentation
+- [ ] **IMPL-005**: Generate Unified API Documentation
+
+## Execution
+```bash
+/workflow:execute IMPL-001
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002
+# ...
+```
+```
+
+## Execution Phase
+
+### Via /workflow:execute
+
+```
+For Each Task (IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...):
+
+/workflow:execute IMPL-NNN
+    ↓
+TodoWrite: pending → in_progress
+    ↓
+Execute flow_control (pre_analysis steps)
+    ↓
+Generate Documentation (apply template)
+    ↓
+TodoWrite: in_progress → completed
+    ↓
+✅ Task Complete
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Status Tracking
+
+**Planning Phase**:
+```
+✅ Session initialization (completed)
+⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
+⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
+```
+
+**Execution Phase**:
+```
+Executing IMPL-001:
+✅ Session initialization
+🔄 IMPL-001: Project Overview (in_progress)
+⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth'
+
+After IMPL-001:
+✅ Session initialization
+✅ IMPL-001: Project Overview (completed)
+🔄 IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (in_progress)
+```
+
+## Documentation Output
+
+### Final Structure
 ```
 .workflow/docs/
-├── README.md              # System navigation
-├── modules/               # Level 1: Module documentation
-│   ├── [module-1]/
-│   │   ├── overview.md
-│   │   ├── api.md
-│   │   ├── dependencies.md
-│   │   └── examples.md
-│   └── [module-n]/...
-├── architecture/          # Level 2: System architecture
+├── README.md                     # IMPL-001: Project overview
+├── modules/
+│   ├── auth/README.md           # IMPL-002: Auth module
+│   └── api/README.md            # IMPL-003: API module
+├── architecture/                # IMPL-004: Architecture
 │   ├── system-design.md
 │   ├── module-map.md
-│   ├── data-flow.md
-│   └── tech-stack.md
-└── api/                   # Level 2: Unified API docs
-    ├── unified-api.md
+│   └── data-flow.md
+└── api/                         # IMPL-005: API docs
+    ├── README.md
     └── openapi.yaml
 ```
 
-## Task Decomposition Standards
+## Next Steps
 
-### Dynamic Task Planning Rules
-**Module Grouping**: Max 3 modules per task, max 30 files per task
-**Task Count**: Calculate based on `total_modules ÷ 3 (rounded up) + base_tasks`
-**File Limits**: Split tasks when file count exceeds 30 in any module group
-**Base Tasks**: System overview (1) + Architecture (1) + API consolidation (1)
-**Module Tasks**: Group related modules by dependency depth and functional similarity
-
-### Documentation Task Types
-**IMPL-001**: System Overview Documentation
-- Project structure analysis
-- Technology stack documentation
-- Main navigation creation
-
-**IMPL-002**: Module Documentation (per module)
-- Individual module analysis
-- API surface documentation
-- Dependencies and relationships
-- Usage examples
-
-**IMPL-003**: Architecture Documentation
-- System design patterns
-- Module interaction mapping
-- Data flow documentation
-- Design principles
-
-**IMPL-004**: API Documentation
-- Endpoint discovery and analysis
-- OpenAPI specification generation
-- Authentication documentation
-- Integration examples
-
-### Task JSON Schema (5-Field Architecture)
-Each documentation task uses the workflow-architecture.md 5-field schema:
-- **id**: IMPL-N format
-- **title**: Documentation task name
-- **status**: pending|active|completed|blocked
-- **meta**: { type: "documentation", agent: "@doc-generator" }
-- **context**: { requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, scope }
-- **flow_control**: { pre_analysis[], implementation_approach, target_files[] }
-
-## Document Generation
-
-### Workflow Process
-**Input Analysis** → **Session Creation** → **IMPL_PLAN.md** → **.task/IMPL-NNN.json** → **TODO_LIST.md** → **Execute Tasks**
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Documentation requirements and task breakdown
-- **Session state**: Task references and documentation paths
-
-**Auto-Created (based on scope)**:
-- **TODO_LIST.md**: Progress tracking for documentation tasks
-- **.task/IMPL-*.json**: Individual documentation tasks with flow_control
-- **.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md**: Documentation analysis artifacts
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/
-├── .active-WFS-docs-20231201-143022  # Active session marker (matches folder name)
-└── WFS-docs-20231201-143022/         # Documentation session folder
-    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md                  # Main documentation plan
-    ├── TODO_LIST.md                  # Progress tracking
-    ├── .process/
-    │   └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md       # Documentation analysis
-    └── .task/
-        ├── IMPL-001.json             # System overview task
-        ├── IMPL-002.json             # Module documentation task
-        ├── IMPL-003.json             # Architecture documentation task
-        └── IMPL-004.json             # API documentation task
+### 1. Review Planning Output
+```bash
+cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL_PLAN.md
+cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/TODO_LIST.md
 ```
 
-### Task Flow Control Templates
+### 2. Execute Documentation Tasks
+```bash
+# Sequential (recommended)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-001  # System overview first
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002  # Module docs
+/workflow:execute IMPL-003
+/workflow:execute IMPL-004  # Architecture
+/workflow:execute IMPL-005  # API docs
 
-**System Overview Task (IMPL-001)**:
-```json
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [
-    {
-      "step": "system_architecture_analysis",
-      "action": "Discover system architecture and module hierarchy",
-      "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
-      "output_to": "system_structure"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "project_discovery",
-      "action": "Discover project structure and entry points",
-      "command": "bash(find . -type f -name '*.json' -o -name '*.md' -o -name 'package.json' | head -20)",
-      "output_to": "project_structure"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "analyze_tech_stack",
-      "action": "Analyze technology stack and dependencies using structure analysis",
-      "command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"Analyze project technology stack and dependencies based on: [system_structure]\"",
-      "output_to": "tech_analysis"
-    }
-  ],
-  "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
-}
+# Parallel (module docs only)
+/workflow:execute IMPL-002 &
+/workflow:execute IMPL-003 &
+wait
 ```
 
-**Module Documentation Task (IMPL-002)**:
-```json
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [
-    {
-      "step": "load_system_structure",
-      "action": "Load system architecture analysis from previous task",
-      "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL-001-system_structure.output 2>/dev/null || ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
-      "output_to": "system_context"
-    },
-    {
-      "step": "module_analysis",
-      "action": "Analyze specific module structure and API within system context",
-      "command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"Analyze module [MODULE_NAME] structure and exported API within system: [system_context]\"",
-      "output_to": "module_context"
-    }
-  ],
-  "target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/[MODULE_NAME]/overview.md"]
-}
+### 3. Review Generated Documentation
+```bash
+ls -lah .workflow/docs/
+cat .workflow/docs/README.md
 ```
 
-## Analysis Templates
-
-### Project Structure Analysis Rules
-- Identify main modules and purposes
-- Map directory organization patterns
-- Extract entry points and configuration files
-- Recognize architectural styles and design patterns
-- Analyze module relationships and dependencies
-- Document technology stack and requirements
-
-### Module Analysis Rules
-- Identify module boundaries and entry points
-- Extract exported functions, classes, interfaces
-- Document internal organization and structure
-- Analyze API surfaces with types and parameters
-- Map dependencies within and between modules
-- Extract usage patterns and examples
-
-### API Analysis Rules
-- Classify endpoint types (REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, RPC)
-- Extract request/response parameters and schemas
-- Document authentication and authorization requirements
-- Generate OpenAPI 3.0 specification structure
-- Create comprehensive endpoint documentation
-- Provide usage examples and integration guides
+### 4. TodoWrite Progress
+- Planning: All tasks `pending`
+- Execution: `pending` → `in_progress` → `completed`
+- Real-time status updates via TodoWrite
 
 ## Error Handling
-- **Invalid document type**: Clear error message with valid options
-- **Module not found**: Skip missing modules with warning
-- **Analysis failures**: Fall back to file-based analysis
-- **Permission issues**: Clear guidance on directory access
+
+- **No modules found**: Create only IMPL-001 (system overview)
+- **Scope path invalid**: Show error and exit
+- **Active session exists**: Prompt to complete or pause
+- **Tool unavailable**: Fall back to gemini
 
 ## Key Benefits
 
-### Structured Documentation Process
-- **Task-based approach**: Documentation broken into manageable, trackable tasks
-- **Flow control integration**: Systematic analysis ensures completeness
-- **Progress visibility**: TODO_LIST.md provides clear completion status
-- **Quality assurance**: Each task has defined acceptance criteria
+### Clear Separation of Concerns
+- **Planning**: Session creation, task decomposition (this command)
+- **Execution**: Content generation, quality assurance (doc-generator agent)
 
-### Workflow Integration
-- **Planning foundation**: Documentation provides context for implementation planning
-- **Execution consistency**: Same task execution model as implementation
-- **Context accumulation**: Documentation builds comprehensive project understanding
+### Scalable Task Management
+- Independent, self-contained tasks
+- Parallelizable module documentation
+- Clear dependencies (architecture needs modules)
 
-## Usage Examples
+### Template-Driven Consistency
+- All documentation follows standard templates
+- Reusable and maintainable
+- Easy to update standards
 
-### Complete Documentation Workflow
-```bash
-# Step 1: Create documentation plan and tasks
-/workflow:docs all
-
-# Step 2: Execute documentation tasks (after planning)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-001  # System overview
-/workflow:execute IMPL-002  # Module documentation
-/workflow:execute IMPL-003  # Architecture documentation
-/workflow:execute IMPL-004  # API documentation
-```
-The system creates structured documentation tasks with proper session management, task.json files, and integration with the broader workflow system for systematic and trackable documentation generation.
+### Full Context for Execution
+- Each task JSON contains complete instructions
+- flow_control defines exact analysis steps
+- Tool selection for flexibility

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/status.md

@@ -1,258 +0,0 @@
----
-name: workflow:status
-description: Generate on-demand views from JSON task data
-usage: /workflow:status [task-id] [--format=<format>] [--validate]
-argument-hint: [optional: task-id, format, validation]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:status
-  - /workflow:status impl-1
-  - /workflow:status --format=hierarchy
-  - /workflow:status --validate
----
-
-# Workflow Status Command (/workflow:status)
-
-## Overview
-Generates on-demand views from JSON task data. No synchronization needed - all views are calculated from the current state of JSON files.
-
-## Core Principles
-**Data Source:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-
-## Key Features
-
-### Pure View Generation
-- **No Sync**: Views are generated, not synchronized
-- **Always Current**: Reads latest JSON data every time
-- **No Persistence**: Views are temporary, not saved
-- **Single Source**: All data comes from JSON files only
-
-### Multiple View Formats
-- **Overview** (default): Current tasks and status
-- **Hierarchy**: Task relationships and structure
-- **Details**: Specific task information
-
-## Usage
-
-### Default Overview
-```bash
-/workflow:status
-```
-
-Generates current workflow overview:
-```markdown
-# Workflow Overview
-**Session**: WFS-user-auth
-**Phase**: IMPLEMENT
-**Type**: medium
-
-## Active Tasks
-- [⚠️] impl-1: Build authentication module (code-developer)
-- [⚠️] impl-2: Setup user management (code-developer)
-
-## Completed Tasks
-- [✅] impl-0: Project setup
-
-## Stats
-- **Total**: 8 tasks
-- **Completed**: 3
-- **Active**: 2
-- **Remaining**: 3
-```
-
-### Specific Task View
-```bash
-/workflow:status impl-1
-```
-
-Shows detailed task information:
-```markdown
-# Task: impl-1
-
-**Title**: Build authentication module
-**Status**: active
-**Agent**: @code-developer
-**Type**: feature
-
-## Context
-- **Requirements**: JWT authentication, OAuth2 support
-- **Scope**: src/auth/*, tests/auth/*
-- **Acceptance**: Module handles JWT tokens, OAuth2 flow implemented
-- **Inherited From**: WFS-user-auth
-
-## Relations
-- **Parent**: none
-- **Subtasks**: impl-1.1, impl-1.2
-- **Dependencies**: impl-0
-
-## Execution
-- **Attempts**: 0
-- **Last Attempt**: never
-
-## Metadata
-- **Created**: 2025-09-05T10:30:00Z
-- **Updated**: 2025-09-05T10:35:00Z
-```
-
-### Hierarchy View
-```bash
-/workflow:status --format=hierarchy
-```
-
-Shows task relationships:
-```markdown
-# Task Hierarchy
-
-## Main Tasks
-- impl-0: Project setup ✅
-- impl-1: Build authentication module ⚠️
-  - impl-1.1: Design auth schema
-  - impl-1.2: Implement auth logic
-- impl-2: Setup user management ⚠️
-
-## Dependencies
-- impl-1 → depends on → impl-0
-- impl-2 → depends on → impl-1
-```
-
-## View Generation Process
-
-### Data Loading
-```pseudo
-function generate_workflow_status(task_id, format):
-  // Load all current data
-  session = load_workflow_session()
-  all_tasks = load_all_task_json_files()
-
-  // Filter if specific task requested
-  if task_id:
-    target_task = find_task(all_tasks, task_id)
-    return generate_task_detail_view(target_task)
-
-  // Generate requested format
-  switch format:
-    case 'hierarchy':
-      return generate_hierarchy_view(all_tasks)
-    default:
-      return generate_overview(session, all_tasks)
-```
-
-### Real-Time Calculation
-- **Task Counts**: Calculated from JSON file status fields
-- **Relationships**: Built from JSON relations fields
-- **Status**: Read directly from current JSON state
-
-## Validation Mode
-
-### Basic Validation
-```bash
-/workflow:status --validate
-```
-
-Performs integrity checks:
-```markdown
-# Validation Results
-
-## JSON File Validation
-✅ All task JSON files are valid
-✅ Session file is valid and readable
-
-## Relationship Validation
-✅ All parent-child relationships are valid
-✅ All dependencies reference existing tasks
-✅ No circular dependencies detected
-
-## Hierarchy Validation
-✅ Task hierarchy within depth limits (max 3 levels)
-✅ All subtask references are bidirectional
-
-## Issues Found
-⚠️ impl-3: No subtasks defined (expected for leaf task)
-
-**Status**: All systems operational
-```
-
-### Validation Checks
-- **JSON Schema**: All files parse correctly
-- **References**: All task IDs exist
-- **Hierarchy**: Parent-child relationships are valid
-- **Dependencies**: No circular dependencies
-- **Depth**: Task hierarchy within limits
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Missing Files
-```bash
-❌ Session file not found
-→ Initialize new workflow session? (y/n)
-
-❌ Task impl-5 not found
-→ Available tasks: impl-1, impl-2, impl-3, impl-4
-```
-
-### Invalid Data
-```bash
-❌ Invalid JSON in impl-2.json
-→ Cannot generate view for impl-2
-→ Repair file manually or recreate task
-
-⚠️ Circular dependency detected: impl-1 → impl-2 → impl-1
-→ Task relationships may be incorrect
-```
-
-## Performance Benefits
-
-### Fast Generation
-- **No File Writes**: Only reads JSON files
-- **No Sync Logic**: No complex synchronization
-- **Instant Results**: Generate views on demand
-- **No Conflicts**: No state consistency issues
-
-### Scalability
-- **Large Task Sets**: Handles hundreds of tasks efficiently
-- **Complex Hierarchies**: No performance degradation
-- **Concurrent Access**: Multiple views can be generated simultaneously
-
-## Integration
-
-### Workflow Integration
-- Use after task creation to see current state
-- Use for debugging task relationships
-
-### Command Integration
-```bash
-# Common workflow
-/task:create "New feature"
-/workflow:status                    # Check current state
-/task:breakdown impl-1
-/workflow:status --format=hierarchy # View new structure
-/task:execute impl-1.1
-```
-
-## Output Formats
-
-### Supported Formats
-- `overview` (default): General workflow status
-- `hierarchy`: Task relationships
-- `tasks`: Simple task list
-- `details`: Comprehensive information
-
-### Custom Filtering
-```bash
-# Show only active tasks
-/workflow:status --format=tasks --filter=active
-
-# Show completed tasks only
-/workflow:status --format=tasks --filter=completed
-
-# Show tasks for specific agent
-/workflow:status --format=tasks --agent=@code-developer
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/task:create` - Create tasks (generates JSON data)
-- `/task:execute` - Execute tasks (updates JSON data)
-- `/task:breakdown` - Create subtasks (generates more JSON data)
-- `/workflow:vibe` - Coordinate agents (uses workflow status for coordination)
-
-This workflow status system provides instant, accurate views of workflow state without any synchronization complexity or performance overhead.

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-agent.md

@@ -169,7 +169,21 @@ Task(
       {
         "type": "synthesis_specification",
         "path": "{synthesis_spec_path}",
-        "priority": "highest"
+        "priority": "highest",
+        "usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "role_analysis",
+        "path": "{role_analysis_path}",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
+        "note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files included based on brainstorming results"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "topic_framework",
+        "path": "{topic_framework_path}",
+        "priority": "low",
+        "usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
       }
     ]
   },
@@ -203,12 +217,13 @@ Task(
       }
     ],
     "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification",
+      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
       "modification_points": ["Apply requirements from synthesis"],
       "logic_flow": [
         "Load synthesis specification",
         "Analyze existing patterns",
         "Implement following specification",
+        "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
         "Validate against acceptance criteria"
       ]
     },

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-tdd.md

@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ Generate TDD-specific task chains from analysis results with enforced Red-Green-
 - **Phase-Explicit**: Each task marked with Red/Green/Refactor phase
 - **Artifact-Aware**: Integrates brainstorming outputs
 - **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from memory
+- **Context-Aware**: Analyzes existing codebase and test patterns
+- **Iterative Green Phase**: Auto-diagnose and fix test failures with Gemini + optional Codex
+- **Safety-First**: Auto-revert on max iterations to prevent broken state
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 - Parse analysis results and identify testable features
@@ -47,32 +50,18 @@ Generate TDD-specific task chains from analysis results with enforced Red-Green-
    - Else: Scan `.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorming/` directory
    - Detect: synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses
 
-### Phase 2: TDD Task Analysis
+### Phase 2: TDD Task JSON Generation
 
-#### Gemini TDD Breakdown
-```bash
-cd project-root && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: Generate TDD task breakdown with Red-Green-Refactor chains
-TASK: Analyze ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and create TDD-structured task breakdown
-CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md,.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorming/*}
-EXPECTED:
-- Feature list with testable requirements (identify 3-8 features)
-- Test cases for each feature (Red phase) - specific test scenarios
-- Implementation requirements (Green phase) - minimal code to pass
-- Refactoring opportunities (Refactor phase) - quality improvements
+**Input**: Use `.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` directly (enhanced with TDD structure from concept-enhanced phase)
+
+**Note**: The ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md now includes TDD-specific breakdown:
+- Feature list with testable requirements
+- Test cases for Red phase
+- Implementation requirements for Green phase
+- Refactoring opportunities
 - Task dependencies and execution order
-- Focus paths for each phase
-RULES:
-- Each feature must have TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR chain
-- Tests must define clear failure conditions
-- Implementation must be minimal to pass tests
-- Refactoring must maintain green tests
-- Output structured markdown for task generation
-- Maximum 10 features (30 total tasks)
-" > .workflow/{session_id}/.process/TDD_TASK_BREAKDOWN.md
-```
 
-### Phase 3: TDD Task JSON Generation
+### Phase 3: Enhanced IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
 
 #### Task Chain Structure
 For each feature, generate 3 tasks with ID format:
@@ -145,19 +134,23 @@ For each feature, generate 3 tasks with ID format:
   "meta": {
     "type": "feature",
     "agent": "@code-developer",
-    "tdd_phase": "green"
+    "tdd_phase": "green",
+    "max_iterations": 3,
+    "use_codex": false
   },
   "context": {
     "requirements": [
       "Implement minimal AuthService to pass TEST-1.1",
       "Handle valid and invalid credentials",
-      "Return appropriate success/error responses"
+      "Return appropriate success/error responses",
+      "If tests fail after implementation, diagnose and fix iteratively"
     ],
     "focus_paths": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts", "tests/auth/login.test.ts"],
     "acceptance": [
       "All tests in TEST-1.1 pass",
       "Implementation is minimal and focused",
-      "No over-engineering or premature optimization"
+      "No over-engineering or premature optimization",
+      "Test failures resolved within iteration limit"
     ],
     "depends_on": ["TEST-1.1"]
   },
@@ -172,21 +165,83 @@ For each feature, generate 3 tasks with ID format:
       },
       {
         "step": "verify_tests_failing",
-        "action": "Confirm tests are currently failing",
+        "action": "Confirm tests are currently failing (Red phase validation)",
         "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts || echo 'Tests failing as expected')",
         "output_to": "initial_test_status",
         "on_error": "warn"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_test_context",
+        "action": "Load test patterns and framework info",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process/test-context-package.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')",
+        "output_to": "test_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
       }
     ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Write minimal code to pass tests, then enter iterative fix cycle if they still fail",
+      "initial_implementation": [
+        "Write minimal code based on test requirements",
+        "Execute test suite: bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+        "If tests pass → Complete task",
+        "If tests fail → Capture failure logs and proceed to test-fix cycle"
+      ],
+      "test_fix_cycle": {
+        "max_iterations": 3,
+        "cycle_pattern": "gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if meta.use_codex=true) → retest",
+        "tools": {
+          "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
+          "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex if meta.use_codex=true",
+          "verification": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)"
+        },
+        "exit_conditions": {
+          "success": "all_tests_pass",
+          "failure": "max_iterations_reached"
+        },
+        "steps": [
+          "ITERATION LOOP (max 3):",
+          "  1. Gemini Diagnosis:",
+          "     bash(cd .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p \"",
+          "     PURPOSE: Diagnose TDD Green phase test failure iteration [N]",
+          "     TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations",
+          "     MODE: analysis",
+          "     CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}",
+          "              Test output: [test_failures]",
+          "              Test requirements: [test_requirements]",
+          "              Implementation: [focus_paths]",
+          "     EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes",
+          "     RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [test_failure_description]",
+          "            Minimal surgical fixes only - stay in Green phase",
+          "     \" > green-fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md)",
+          "  2. Apply Fix (check meta.use_codex):",
+          "     IF meta.use_codex=false (default): Present diagnosis to user for manual fix",
+          "     IF meta.use_codex=true: Codex applies fix automatically",
+          "  3. Retest: bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
+          "  4. If pass → Exit loop, complete task",
+          "     If fail → Continue to next iteration",
+          "IF max_iterations reached: Revert changes, report failure"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
     "post_completion": [
       {
         "step": "verify_tests_passing",
-        "action": "Confirm all tests now pass",
+        "action": "Confirm all tests now pass (Green phase achieved)",
         "command": "bash(npm test -- tests/auth/login.test.ts)",
         "output_to": "final_test_status",
         "on_error": "fail"
       }
-    ]
+    ],
+    "error_handling": {
+      "max_iterations_reached": {
+        "action": "revert_all_changes",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
+          "bash(echo 'TDD Green phase failed: Unable to pass tests within 3 iterations' > .workflow/WFS-xxx/.process/green-phase-failure.md)"
+        ],
+        "report": "Generate failure report in .summaries/IMPL-1.1-failure-report.md"
+      }
+    }
   }
 }
 ```
@@ -248,19 +303,31 @@ For each feature, generate 3 tasks with ID format:
 }
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: TDD_PLAN.md Generation
+### Phase 4: Unified IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
 
-Generate TDD-specific plan with:
-- Feature breakdown
-- Red-Green-Refactor chains
-- Execution order
-- TDD compliance checkpoints
+Generate single comprehensive IMPL_PLAN.md with:
 
-### Phase 5: Enhanced IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+**Frontmatter**:
+```yaml
+---
+identifier: WFS-{session-id}
+workflow_type: "tdd"
+feature_count: N
+task_count: 3N
+tdd_chains: N
+---
+```
 
-Generate standard IMPL_PLAN.md with TDD context reference.
+**Structure**:
+1. **Summary**: Project overview
+2. **TDD Task Chains** (TDD-specific section):
+   - Visual representation of TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR chains
+   - Feature-by-feature breakdown with phase indicators
+3. **Task Breakdown**: Standard task listing
+4. **Implementation Strategy**: Execution approach
+5. **Success Criteria**: Acceptance conditions
 
-### Phase 6: TODO_LIST.md Generation
+### Phase 5: TODO_LIST.md Generation
 
 Generate task list with TDD phase indicators:
 ```markdown
@@ -270,7 +337,7 @@ Generate task list with TDD phase indicators:
 - [ ] **REFACTOR-1.1**: Refactor implementation (🔵 REFACTOR) [depends: IMPL-1.1] → [📋](./.task/REFACTOR-1.1.json)
 ```
 
-### Phase 7: Session State Update
+### Phase 6: Session State Update
 
 Update workflow-session.json with TDD metadata:
 ```json
@@ -285,18 +352,18 @@ Update workflow-session.json with TDD metadata:
 ## Output Files Structure
 ```
 .workflow/{session-id}/
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md                     # Standard implementation plan
-├── TDD_PLAN.md                      # TDD-specific plan ⭐ NEW
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                     # Unified plan with TDD Task Chains section
 ├── TODO_LIST.md                     # Progress tracking with TDD phases
 ├── .task/
 │   ├── TEST-1.1.json                # Red phase task
-│   ├── IMPL-1.1.json                # Green phase task
+│   ├── IMPL-1.1.json                # Green phase task (with test-fix-cycle)
 │   ├── REFACTOR-1.1.json            # Refactor phase task
 │   └── ...
 └── .process/
-    ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md          # Input from concept-enhanced
-    ├── TDD_TASK_BREAKDOWN.md        # Gemini TDD breakdown ⭐ NEW
-    └── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather
+    ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md          # Enhanced with TDD breakdown from concept-enhanced
+    ├── test-context-package.json    # Test coverage analysis
+    ├── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather
+    └── green-fix-iteration-*.md     # Fix logs from Green phase
 ```
 
 ## Validation Rules
@@ -356,13 +423,49 @@ Structure:
 - Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1
 
 Plans generated:
-- TDD Plan: .workflow/WFS-auth/TDD_PLAN.md
-- Implementation Plan: .workflow/WFS-auth/IMPL_PLAN.md
+- Unified Plan: .workflow/WFS-auth/IMPL_PLAN.md (includes TDD Task Chains section)
 
 Next: /workflow:execute or /workflow:tdd-verify
 ```
 
+## Test Coverage Analysis Integration
+
+The TDD workflow includes test coverage analysis (via `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`) to:
+- Detect existing test patterns and conventions
+- Identify current test coverage gaps
+- Discover test framework and configuration
+- Enable integration with existing tests
+
+This makes TDD workflow context-aware instead of assuming greenfield scenarios.
+
+## Iterative Green Phase with Test-Fix Cycle
+
+IMPL (Green phase) tasks include automatic test-fix cycle:
+
+**Process Flow**:
+1. **Initial Implementation**: Write minimal code to pass tests
+2. **Test Execution**: Run test suite
+3. **Success Path**: Tests pass → Complete task
+4. **Failure Path**: Tests fail → Enter iterative fix cycle:
+   - **Gemini Diagnosis**: Analyze failures with bug-fix template
+   - **Fix Application**: Manual (default) or Codex (if meta.use_codex=true)
+   - **Retest**: Verify fix resolves failures
+   - **Repeat**: Up to max_iterations (default: 3)
+5. **Safety Net**: Auto-revert all changes if max iterations reached
+
+**Key Benefits**:
+- ✅ Faster feedback loop within Green phase
+- ✅ Autonomous recovery from initial implementation errors
+- ✅ Systematic debugging with Gemini's bug-fix template
+- ✅ Safe rollback prevents broken TDD state
+
+## Configuration Options
+- **meta.max_iterations**: Number of fix attempts (default: 3 for TDD, 5 for test-gen)
+- **meta.use_codex**: Enable Codex automated fixes (default: false, manual)
+
 ## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:tdd-plan` - Orchestrates TDD workflow planning
+- `/workflow:tdd-plan` - Orchestrates TDD workflow planning (6 phases)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Analyzes test coverage
 - `/workflow:execute` - Executes TDD tasks in order
 - `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Verifies TDD compliance
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Post-implementation test generation

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate.md

@@ -84,21 +84,22 @@ Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic a
         "source": "brainstorm_synthesis",
         "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
         "priority": "highest",
-        "contains": "complete_integrated_specification"
+        "usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "role_analysis",
+        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role-name]/analysis.md",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
+        "note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files may be included based on brainstorming results"
       },
       {
         "type": "topic_framework",
         "source": "brainstorm_framework",
         "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md",
-        "priority": "medium",
-        "contains": "discussion_framework_structure"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "individual_role_analysis",
-        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md",
         "priority": "low",
-        "contains": "role_specific_analysis_fallback"
+        "usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
       }
     ]
   },
@@ -115,14 +116,16 @@ Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic a
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
       },
       {
-        "step": "load_individual_role_artifacts",
-        "action": "Load individual role analyses as fallback",
+        "step": "load_role_analysis_artifacts",
+        "action": "Load role-specific analysis documents for technical details",
+        "note": "These artifacts contain implementation details not in synthesis. Consult when needing: API schemas, caching configs, design tokens, ADRs, performance metrics.",
         "commands": [
           "bash(find .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/ -name 'analysis.md' 2>/dev/null | head -8)",
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md)",
           "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md)",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md)"
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md)"
         ],
-        "output_to": "individual_artifacts",
+        "output_to": "role_analysis_artifacts",
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
       },
       {
@@ -152,10 +155,11 @@ Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic a
       }
     ],
     "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification",
+      "task_description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
       "modification_points": [
         "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
         "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
+        "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
         "Integrate with existing patterns"
       ],
       "logic_flow": [
@@ -163,6 +167,7 @@ Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic a
         "Extract requirements and design",
         "Analyze existing patterns",
         "Implement following specification",
+        "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
         "Validate against acceptance criteria"
       ]
     },

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-concept-enhanced.md

@@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
+---
+name: test-concept-enhanced
+description: Analyze test requirements and generate test generation strategy using Gemini
+usage: /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session <test_session_id> --context <test_context_package_path>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id --context path/to/test-context-package.json"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session WFS-test-auth --context .workflow/WFS-test-auth/.process/test-context-package.json
+---
+
+# Test Concept Enhanced Command
+
+## Overview
+Specialized analysis tool for test generation workflows that uses Gemini to analyze test coverage gaps, implementation context, and generate comprehensive test generation strategies.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Coverage-Driven**: Focus on identified test gaps from context analysis
+- **Pattern-Based**: Learn from existing tests and project conventions
+- **Gemini-Powered**: Use Gemini for test requirement analysis and strategy design
+- **Single-Round Analysis**: Comprehensive test analysis in one execution
+- **No Code Generation**: Strategy and planning only, actual test generation happens in task execution
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Parse test-context-package.json from test-context-gather
+- Analyze implementation summaries and coverage gaps
+- Study existing test patterns and conventions
+- Generate test generation strategy using Gemini
+- Produce TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md for task generation
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Validation & Preparation
+
+1. **Session Validation**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Verify test session type is "test-gen"
+   - Extract source session reference
+
+2. **Context Package Validation**
+   - Read `test-context-package.json`
+   - Validate required sections: metadata, source_context, test_coverage, test_framework
+   - Extract coverage gaps and framework details
+
+3. **Strategy Determination**
+   - **Simple Test Generation** (1-3 files): Single Gemini analysis
+   - **Medium Test Generation** (4-6 files): Gemini comprehensive analysis
+   - **Complex Test Generation** (>6 files): Gemini analysis with modular approach
+
+### Phase 2: Gemini Test Analysis
+
+**Tool Configuration**:
+```bash
+cd .workflow/{test_session_id}/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze test coverage gaps and design comprehensive test generation strategy
+TASK: Study implementation context, existing tests, and generate test requirements for missing coverage
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json}
+
+**MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze test-context-package.json to understand:
+- Test coverage gaps from test_coverage.missing_tests[]
+- Implementation context from source_context.implementation_summaries[]
+- Existing test patterns from test_framework.conventions
+- Changed files requiring tests from source_context.implementation_summaries[].changed_files
+
+**ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+1. **Implementation Understanding**
+   - Load all implementation summaries from source session
+   - Understand implemented features, APIs, and business logic
+   - Extract key functions, classes, and modules
+   - Identify integration points and dependencies
+
+2. **Existing Test Pattern Analysis**
+   - Study existing test files for patterns and conventions
+   - Identify test structure (describe/it, test suites, fixtures)
+   - Analyze assertion patterns and mocking strategies
+   - Extract test setup/teardown patterns
+
+3. **Coverage Gap Assessment**
+   - For each file in missing_tests[], analyze:
+     - File purpose and functionality
+     - Public APIs requiring test coverage
+     - Critical paths and edge cases
+     - Integration points requiring tests
+   - Prioritize tests: high (core logic), medium (utilities), low (helpers)
+
+4. **Test Requirements Specification**
+   - For each missing test file, specify:
+     - **Test scope**: What needs to be tested
+     - **Test scenarios**: Happy path, error cases, edge cases, integration
+     - **Test data**: Required fixtures, mocks, test data
+     - **Dependencies**: External services, databases, APIs to mock
+     - **Coverage targets**: Functions/methods requiring tests
+
+5. **Test Generation Strategy**
+   - Determine test generation approach for each file
+   - Identify reusable test patterns from existing tests
+   - Plan test data and fixture requirements
+   - Define mocking strategy for dependencies
+   - Specify expected test file structure
+
+EXPECTED OUTPUT - Write to gemini-test-analysis.md:
+
+# Test Generation Analysis
+
+## 1. Implementation Context Summary
+- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
+- **Implemented Features**: {feature_summary}
+- **Changed Files**: {list_of_implementation_files}
+- **Tech Stack**: {technologies_used}
+
+## 2. Test Coverage Assessment
+- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
+- **Missing Tests**: {count} files
+- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
+- **Priority Breakdown**:
+  - High Priority: {count} files (core business logic)
+  - Medium Priority: {count} files (utilities, helpers)
+  - Low Priority: {count} files (configuration, constants)
+
+## 3. Existing Test Pattern Analysis
+- **Test Framework**: {framework_name_and_version}
+- **File Naming Convention**: {pattern}
+- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_or_other}
+- **Assertion Style**: {expect_assert_should}
+- **Mocking Strategy**: {mocking_framework_and_patterns}
+- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach_patterns}
+- **Test Data**: {fixtures_factories_builders}
+
+## 4. Test Requirements by File
+
+### File: {implementation_file_path}
+**Test File**: {suggested_test_file_path}
+**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
+
+#### Scope
+- {description_of_what_needs_testing}
+
+#### Test Scenarios
+1. **Happy Path Tests**
+   - {scenario_1}
+   - {scenario_2}
+
+2. **Error Handling Tests**
+   - {error_scenario_1}
+   - {error_scenario_2}
+
+3. **Edge Case Tests**
+   - {edge_case_1}
+   - {edge_case_2}
+
+4. **Integration Tests** (if applicable)
+   - {integration_scenario_1}
+   - {integration_scenario_2}
+
+#### Test Data & Fixtures
+- {required_test_data}
+- {required_mocks}
+- {required_fixtures}
+
+#### Dependencies to Mock
+- {external_service_1}
+- {external_service_2}
+
+#### Coverage Targets
+- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
+- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
+
+---
+[Repeat for each missing test file]
+---
+
+## 5. Test Generation Strategy
+
+### Overall Approach
+- {strategy_description}
+
+### Test Generation Order
+1. {file_1} - {rationale}
+2. {file_2} - {rationale}
+3. {file_3} - {rationale}
+
+### Reusable Patterns
+- {pattern_1_from_existing_tests}
+- {pattern_2_from_existing_tests}
+
+### Test Data Strategy
+- {approach_to_test_data_and_fixtures}
+
+### Mocking Strategy
+- {approach_to_mocking_dependencies}
+
+### Quality Criteria
+- Code coverage target: {percentage}%
+- Test scenarios per function: {count}
+- Integration test coverage: {approach}
+
+## 6. Implementation Targets
+
+**Purpose**: Identify new test files to create
+
+**Format**: New test files only (no existing files to modify)
+
+**Test Files to Create**:
+1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
+   - **Type**: Create new test file
+   - **Purpose**: Test TokenValidator class
+   - **Scenarios**: 15 test cases covering validation logic, error handling, edge cases
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, test fixtures for tokens
+
+2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
+   - **Type**: Create new test file
+   - **Purpose**: Test error handling middleware
+   - **Scenarios**: 8 test cases for different error types and response formats
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock Express req/res/next, error fixtures
+
+[List all test files to create]
+
+## 7. Success Metrics
+- **Test Coverage Goal**: {target_percentage}%
+- **Test Quality**: All scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
+- **Convention Compliance**: Follow existing test patterns
+- **Maintainability**: Clear test descriptions, reusable fixtures
+
+RULES:
+- Focus on TEST REQUIREMENTS and GENERATION STRATEGY, NOT code generation
+- Study existing test patterns thoroughly for consistency
+- Prioritize critical business logic tests
+- Specify clear test scenarios and coverage targets
+- Identify all dependencies requiring mocks
+- **MUST write output to .workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md**
+- Do NOT generate actual test code or implementation
+- Output ONLY test analysis and generation strategy
+" --approval-mode yolo
+```
+
+**Output Location**: `.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md`
+
+### Phase 3: Results Synthesis
+
+1. **Output Validation**
+   - Verify `gemini-test-analysis.md` exists and is complete
+   - Validate all required sections present
+   - Check test requirements are actionable
+
+2. **Quality Assessment**
+   - Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
+   - Dependencies and mocks clearly identified
+   - Test generation strategy is practical
+   - Coverage targets are reasonable
+
+### Phase 4: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Generation
+
+Synthesize Gemini analysis into standardized format:
+
+```markdown
+# Test Generation Analysis Results
+
+## Executive Summary
+- **Test Session**: {test_session_id}
+- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
+- **Analysis Timestamp**: {timestamp}
+- **Coverage Gap**: {missing_test_count} files require tests
+- **Test Framework**: {framework}
+- **Overall Strategy**: {high_level_approach}
+
+---
+
+## 1. Coverage Assessment
+
+### Current Coverage
+- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
+- **Implementation Files**: {count} files
+- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
+
+### Missing Tests (Priority Order)
+1. **High Priority** ({count} files)
+   - {file_1} - {reason}
+   - {file_2} - {reason}
+
+2. **Medium Priority** ({count} files)
+   - {file_1} - {reason}
+
+3. **Low Priority** ({count} files)
+   - {file_1} - {reason}
+
+---
+
+## 2. Test Framework & Conventions
+
+### Framework Configuration
+- **Framework**: {framework_name}
+- **Version**: {version}
+- **Test Pattern**: {file_pattern}
+- **Test Directory**: {directory_structure}
+
+### Conventions
+- **File Naming**: {convention}
+- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_blocks}
+- **Assertions**: {assertion_library}
+- **Mocking**: {mocking_framework}
+- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach}
+
+### Example Pattern (from existing tests)
+```
+{example_test_structure_from_analysis}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 3. Test Requirements by File
+
+[For each missing test, include:]
+
+### Test File: {test_file_path}
+**Implementation**: {implementation_file}
+**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
+**Estimated Test Count**: {count}
+
+#### Test Scenarios
+1. **Happy Path**: {scenarios}
+2. **Error Handling**: {scenarios}
+3. **Edge Cases**: {scenarios}
+4. **Integration**: {scenarios}
+
+#### Dependencies & Mocks
+- {dependency_1_to_mock}
+- {dependency_2_to_mock}
+
+#### Test Data Requirements
+- {fixture_1}
+- {fixture_2}
+
+---
+
+## 4. Test Generation Strategy
+
+### Generation Approach
+{overall_strategy_description}
+
+### Generation Order
+1. {test_file_1} - {rationale}
+2. {test_file_2} - {rationale}
+3. {test_file_3} - {rationale}
+
+### Reusable Components
+- **Test Fixtures**: {common_fixtures}
+- **Mock Patterns**: {common_mocks}
+- **Helper Functions**: {test_helpers}
+
+### Quality Targets
+- **Coverage Goal**: {percentage}%
+- **Scenarios per Function**: {min_count}
+- **Integration Coverage**: {approach}
+
+---
+
+## 5. Implementation Targets
+
+**Purpose**: New test files to create (code-developer will generate these)
+
+**Test Files to Create**:
+
+1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
+   - **Implementation Source**: `src/auth/TokenValidator.ts`
+   - **Test Scenarios**: 15 (validation, error handling, edge cases)
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, token fixtures
+   - **Priority**: High
+
+2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
+   - **Implementation Source**: `src/middleware/errorHandler.ts`
+   - **Test Scenarios**: 8 (error types, response formats)
+   - **Dependencies**: Mock Express, error fixtures
+   - **Priority**: High
+
+[List all test files with full specifications]
+
+---
+
+## 6. Success Criteria
+
+### Coverage Metrics
+- Achieve {target_percentage}% code coverage
+- All public APIs have tests
+- Critical paths fully covered
+
+### Quality Standards
+- All test scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
+- Follow existing test conventions
+- Clear test descriptions and assertions
+- Maintainable test structure
+
+### Validation Approach
+- Run full test suite after generation
+- Verify coverage with coverage tool
+- Manual review of test quality
+- Integration test validation
+
+---
+
+## 7. Reference Information
+
+### Source Context
+- **Implementation Summaries**: {paths}
+- **Existing Tests**: {example_tests}
+- **Documentation**: {relevant_docs}
+
+### Analysis Tools
+- **Gemini Analysis**: gemini-test-analysis.md
+- **Coverage Tools**: {coverage_tool_if_detected}
+```
+
+**Output Location**: `.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing context package | test-context-gather not run | Run test-context-gather first |
+| No coverage gaps | All files have tests | Skip test generation, proceed to test execution |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to configure test framework |
+| Invalid source session | Source session incomplete | Complete implementation first |
+
+### Gemini Execution Errors
+| Error | Cause | Recovery |
+|-------|-------|----------|
+| Timeout | Large project analysis | Reduce scope, analyze by module |
+| Output incomplete | Token limit exceeded | Retry with focused analysis |
+| No output file | Write permission error | Check directory permissions |
+
+### Fallback Strategy
+- If Gemini fails, generate basic TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from context package
+- Use coverage gaps and framework info to create minimal requirements
+- Provide guidance for manual test planning
+
+## Performance Optimization
+
+- **Focused Analysis**: Only analyze files with missing tests
+- **Pattern Reuse**: Study existing tests for quick pattern extraction
+- **Parallel Operations**: Load implementation summaries in parallel
+- **Timeout Management**: 20-minute limit for Gemini analysis
+
+## Integration
+
+### Called By
+- `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4: Analysis)
+
+### Requires
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` output (test-context-package.json)
+
+### Followed By
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Generates test task JSON with code-developer invocation
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Valid TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated
+- ✅ All missing tests documented with requirements
+- ✅ Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
+- ✅ Dependencies and mocks identified
+- ✅ Test generation strategy is actionable
+- ✅ Execution time < 20 minutes
+- ✅ Output follows existing test conventions
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Provides input context
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Consumes analysis results
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Main test generation workflow

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-context-gather.md

@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+---
+name: test-context-gather
+description: Collect test coverage context and identify files requiring test generation
+usage: /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session <test_session_id>
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-payment
+---
+
+# Test Context Gather Command
+
+## Overview
+Specialized context collector for test generation workflows that analyzes test coverage, identifies missing tests, and packages implementation context from source sessions.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Coverage-First**: Analyze existing test coverage before planning
+- **Gap Identification**: Locate implementation files without corresponding tests
+- **Source Context Loading**: Import implementation summaries from source session
+- **Framework Detection**: Auto-detect test framework and patterns
+- **MCP-Powered**: Leverage code-index tools for precise analysis
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Load source session implementation context
+- Analyze current test coverage using MCP tools
+- Identify files requiring test generation
+- Detect test framework and conventions
+- Package test context for analysis phase
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Loading
+
+1. **Test Session Validation**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Extract `meta.source_session` reference
+   - Validate test session type is "test-gen"
+
+2. **Source Session Context Loading**
+   - Read `.workflow/{source_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Load implementation summaries from `.workflow/{source_session_id}/.summaries/`
+   - Extract changed files and implementation scope
+   - Identify implementation patterns and tech stack
+
+### Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis (MCP Tools)
+
+1. **Existing Test Discovery**
+   ```bash
+   # Find all test files
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.spec.*")
+   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*test_*.py")
+
+   # Search for test patterns
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="describe|it|test|@Test",
+     file_pattern="*.test.*",
+     context_lines=0
+   )
+   ```
+
+2. **Coverage Gap Analysis**
+   ```bash
+   # For each implementation file from source session
+   # Check if corresponding test file exists
+
+   # Example: src/auth/AuthService.ts -> tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts
+   #          src/utils/validator.py -> tests/test_validator.py
+
+   # Output: List of files without tests
+   ```
+
+3. **Test Statistics**
+   - Count total test files
+   - Count implementation files from source session
+   - Calculate coverage percentage
+   - Identify coverage gaps by module
+
+### Phase 3: Test Framework Detection
+
+1. **Framework Identification**
+   ```bash
+   # Check package.json or requirements.txt
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="jest|mocha|jasmine|pytest|unittest|rspec",
+     file_pattern="package.json|requirements.txt|Gemfile",
+     context_lines=2
+   )
+
+   # Analyze existing test patterns
+   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+     pattern="describe\\(|it\\(|test\\(|def test_",
+     file_pattern="*.test.*",
+     context_lines=3
+   )
+   ```
+
+2. **Convention Analysis**
+   - Test file naming patterns (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts)
+   - Test directory structure (tests/ vs __tests__ vs src/**/*.test.*)
+   - Assertion library (expect, assert, should)
+   - Mocking framework (jest.fn, sinon, unittest.mock)
+
+### Phase 4: Context Packaging
+
+Generate `test-context-package.json`:
+
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "test_session_id": "WFS-test-auth",
+    "source_session_id": "WFS-auth",
+    "timestamp": "2025-10-04T10:30:00Z",
+    "task_type": "test-generation",
+    "complexity": "medium"
+  },
+  "source_context": {
+    "implementation_summaries": [
+      {
+        "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+        "summary_path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+        "changed_files": [
+          "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
+          "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+          "src/middleware/auth.ts"
+        ],
+        "implementation_type": "feature"
+      }
+    ],
+    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "express", "jsonwebtoken"],
+    "project_patterns": {
+      "architecture": "layered",
+      "error_handling": "try-catch with custom errors",
+      "async_pattern": "async/await"
+    }
+  },
+  "test_coverage": {
+    "existing_tests": [
+      "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
+      "tests/middleware/auth.test.ts"
+    ],
+    "missing_tests": [
+      {
+        "implementation_file": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+        "suggested_test_file": "tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "reason": "New implementation without tests"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_stats": {
+      "total_implementation_files": 3,
+      "files_with_tests": 2,
+      "files_without_tests": 1,
+      "coverage_percentage": 66.7
+    }
+  },
+  "test_framework": {
+    "framework": "jest",
+    "version": "^29.0.0",
+    "test_pattern": "**/*.test.ts",
+    "test_directory": "tests/",
+    "assertion_library": "expect",
+    "mocking_framework": "jest",
+    "conventions": {
+      "file_naming": "*.test.ts",
+      "test_structure": "describe/it blocks",
+      "setup_teardown": "beforeEach/afterEach"
+    }
+  },
+  "assets": [
+    {
+      "type": "implementation_summary",
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+      "relevance": "Source implementation context",
+      "priority": "highest"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "existing_test",
+      "path": "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
+      "relevance": "Test pattern reference",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "source_code",
+      "path": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+      "relevance": "Implementation requiring tests",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "documentation",
+      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+      "relevance": "Project conventions",
+      "priority": "medium"
+    }
+  ],
+  "focus_areas": [
+    "Generate comprehensive tests for TokenValidator",
+    "Follow existing Jest patterns from AuthService tests",
+    "Cover happy path, error cases, and edge cases",
+    "Include integration tests for middleware"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Output Location
+
+```
+.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json
+```
+
+## MCP Tools Usage
+
+### File Discovery
+```bash
+# Test files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.spec.*")
+
+# Implementation files
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
+mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.js")
+```
+
+### Content Search
+```bash
+# Test framework detection
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="jest|mocha|pytest",
+  file_pattern="package.json|requirements.txt"
+)
+
+# Test pattern analysis
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
+  pattern="describe|it|test",
+  file_pattern="*.test.*",
+  context_lines=2
+)
+```
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+```bash
+# For each implementation file
+# Check if test exists
+implementation_file="src/auth/AuthService.ts"
+test_file_patterns=(
+  "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts"
+  "src/auth/AuthService.test.ts"
+  "src/auth/__tests__/AuthService.test.ts"
+)
+
+# Search for test file
+for pattern in "${test_file_patterns[@]}"; do
+  if mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="$pattern") | grep -q .; then
+    echo "✅ Test exists: $pattern"
+    break
+  fi
+done
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Source session not found | Invalid source_session reference | Verify test session metadata |
+| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Complete source session first |
+| MCP tools unavailable | MCP not configured | Fallback to bash find/grep |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to specify framework |
+
+## Fallback Strategy (No MCP)
+
+```bash
+# File discovery
+find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | grep -v node_modules
+
+# Framework detection
+grep -r "jest\|mocha\|pytest" package.json requirements.txt 2>/dev/null
+
+# Coverage analysis
+for impl_file in $(cat changed_files.txt); do
+  test_file=$(echo $impl_file | sed 's/src/tests/' | sed 's/\(.*\)\.\(ts\|js\|py\)$/\1.test.\2/')
+  [ ! -f "$test_file" ] && echo "$impl_file → MISSING TEST"
+done
+```
+
+## Integration
+
+### Called By
+- `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 3: Context Gathering)
+
+### Calls
+- MCP code-index tools for analysis
+- Bash file operations for fallback
+
+### Followed By
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Analyzes context and plans test generation
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Source session context loaded successfully
+- ✅ Test coverage gaps identified with MCP tools
+- ✅ Test framework detected and documented
+- ✅ Valid test-context-package.json generated
+- ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
+- ✅ Execution time < 20 seconds
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Main test generation workflow
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Test task JSON generation

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,655 @@
+---
+name: test-task-generate
+description: Generate test-fix task JSON with iterative test-fix-retest cycle specification
+usage: /workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session <test-session-id>
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] --session WFS-test-session-id"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+---
+
+# Test Task Generation Command
+
+## Overview
+Generate specialized test-fix task JSON with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle specification, including Gemini diagnosis (using bug-fix template) and manual fix workflow (Codex automation only when explicitly requested).
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Analysis-Driven Test Generation**: Use TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
+- **Agent-Based Test Creation**: Call @code-developer agent for comprehensive test generation
+- **Coverage-First**: Generate all missing tests before execution
+- **Test Execution**: Execute complete test suite after generation
+- **Gemini Diagnosis**: Use Gemini for root cause analysis and fix suggestions (references bug-fix template)
+- **Manual Fixes First**: Apply fixes manually by default, codex only when explicitly needed
+- **Iterative Refinement**: Repeat test-analyze-fix-retest cycle until all tests pass
+- **Surgical Fixes**: Minimal code changes, no refactoring during test fixes
+- **Auto-Revert**: Rollback all changes if max iterations reached
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
+- Extract test requirements and generation strategy
+- Parse `--use-codex` flag to determine fix mode (manual vs automated)
+- Generate test generation subtask calling @code-developer
+- Generate test execution and fix cycle task JSON with appropriate fix mode
+- Configure Gemini diagnosis workflow (bug-fix template) and manual/Codex fix application
+- Create test-oriented IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md with test generation phase
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
+
+1. **Parameter Parsing**
+   - Parse `--use-codex` flag from command arguments
+   - Store flag value for IMPL-002.json generation
+
+2. **Test Session Validation**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json`
+   - Verify `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+   - Extract `source_session_id` from metadata
+
+3. **Test Analysis Results Loading**
+   - **REQUIRED**: Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+   - Parse test requirements by file
+   - Extract test generation strategy
+   - Identify test files to create with specifications
+
+4. **Test Context Package Loading**
+   - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json`
+   - Extract test framework configuration
+   - Extract coverage gaps and priorities
+   - Load source session implementation summaries
+
+### Phase 2: Task JSON Generation
+
+Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
+1. **IMPL-001.json** - Test Generation (calls @code-developer)
+2. **IMPL-002.json** - Test Execution and Fix Cycle (calls @test-fix-agent)
+
+#### IMPL-001.json - Test Generation Task
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Generate comprehensive tests for [sourceSessionId]",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-gen",
+    "agent": "@code-developer",
+    "source_session": "[sourceSessionId]",
+    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|cargo|detected"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Generate comprehensive test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+      "Follow existing test patterns and conventions from test framework",
+      "Create tests for all missing coverage identified in analysis",
+      "Include happy path, error handling, edge cases, and integration tests",
+      "Use test data and mocks as specified in analysis",
+      "Ensure tests follow project coding standards"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": [
+      "tests/**/*",
+      "src/**/*.test.*",
+      "{paths_from_analysis}"
+    ],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "All test files from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5 are created",
+      "Tests follow existing test patterns and conventions",
+      "Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases, integration",
+      "All dependencies are properly mocked",
+      "Test files are syntactically valid and can be executed",
+      "Test coverage meets analysis requirements"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": [],
+    "source_context": {
+      "session_id": "[sourceSessionId]",
+      "test_analysis": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+      "test_context": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json",
+      "implementation_summaries": [
+        ".workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_test_analysis",
+        "action": "Load test generation requirements and strategy",
+        "commands": [
+          "Read(.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)",
+          "Read(.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "test_generation_requirements",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_implementation_context",
+        "action": "Load source implementation for test generation context",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(for f in .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md; do echo \"=== $(basename $f) ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "implementation_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_test_patterns",
+        "action": "Study existing tests for pattern reference",
+        "commands": [
+          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
+          "bash(# Read first 2 existing test files as examples)",
+          "bash(test_files=$(mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\") | head -2))",
+          "bash(for f in $test_files; do echo \"=== $f ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "existing_test_patterns",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md. Follow test generation strategy and create all test files listed in section 5 (Implementation Targets).",
+      "generation_steps": [
+        "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 3 (Test Requirements by File)",
+        "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 4 (Test Generation Strategy)",
+        "Study existing test patterns from test_context.test_framework.conventions",
+        "For each test file in section 5 (Implementation Targets):",
+        "  - Create test file with specified scenarios",
+        "  - Implement happy path tests",
+        "  - Implement error handling tests",
+        "  - Implement edge case tests",
+        "  - Implement integration tests (if specified)",
+        "  - Add required mocks and fixtures",
+        "Follow test framework conventions and project standards",
+        "Ensure all tests are executable and syntactically valid"
+      ],
+      "quality_criteria": [
+        "All test scenarios from analysis are implemented",
+        "Test structure matches existing patterns",
+        "Clear test descriptions and assertions",
+        "Proper setup/teardown and fixtures",
+        "Dependencies properly mocked",
+        "Tests follow project coding standards"
+      ]
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      "{test_file_1 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
+      "{test_file_2 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
+      "{test_file_N from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### IMPL-002.json - Test Execution & Fix Cycle Task
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-002",
+  "title": "Execute and fix tests for [sourceSessionId]",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-fix",
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "source_session": "[sourceSessionId]",
+    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|cargo|detected",
+    "max_iterations": 5,
+    "use_codex": false  // Set to true if --use-codex flag present
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Execute complete test suite (generated in IMPL-001)",
+      "Diagnose test failures using Gemini analysis with bug-fix template",
+      "Present fixes to user for manual application (default)",
+      "Use Codex ONLY if user explicitly requests automation",
+      "Iterate until all tests pass or max iterations reached",
+      "Revert changes if unable to fix within iteration limit"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": [
+      "tests/**/*",
+      "src/**/*.test.*",
+      "{implementation_files_from_source_session}"
+    ],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "All tests pass successfully (100% pass rate)",
+      "No test failures or errors in final run",
+      "Code changes are minimal and surgical",
+      "All fixes are verified through retest",
+      "Iteration logs document fix progression"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001"],
+    "source_context": {
+      "session_id": "[sourceSessionId]",
+      "test_generation_summary": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+      "implementation_summaries": [
+        ".workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_source_session_summaries",
+        "action": "Load implementation context from source session",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(find .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/ -name 'IMPL-*-summary.md' 2>/dev/null)",
+          "bash(for f in .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md; do echo \"=== $(basename $f) ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "implementation_context",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "discover_test_framework",
+        "action": "Identify test framework and test command",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(jq -r '.scripts.test // \"npm test\"' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo 'pytest' || echo 'cargo test')",
+          "bash([ -f 'package.json' ] && echo 'jest/npm' || [ -f 'pytest.ini' ] && echo 'pytest' || [ -f 'Cargo.toml' ] && echo 'cargo' || echo 'unknown')"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "test_command",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_test_coverage",
+        "action": "Analyze test coverage and identify missing tests",
+        "commands": [
+          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
+          "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"test|describe|it|def test_\", file_pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
+          "bash(# Count implementation files vs test files)",
+          "bash(impl_count=$(find [changed_files_dirs] -type f \\( -name '*.ts' -o -name '*.js' -o -name '*.py' \\) ! -name '*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | wc -l))",
+          "bash(test_count=$(mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\") | wc -l))",
+          "bash(echo \"Implementation files: $impl_count, Test files: $test_count\")"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "test_coverage_analysis",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "identify_files_without_tests",
+        "action": "List implementation files that lack corresponding test files",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(# For each changed file from source session, check if test exists)",
+          "bash(for file in [changed_files]; do test_file=$(echo $file | sed 's/\\(.*\\)\\.\\(ts\\|js\\|py\\)$/\\1.test.\\2/'); [ ! -f \"$test_file\" ] && echo \"$file\"; done)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "files_without_tests",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "prepare_test_environment",
+        "action": "Ensure test environment is ready",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash([ -f 'package.json' ] && npm install 2>/dev/null || true)",
+          "bash([ -f 'requirements.txt' ] && pip install -q -r requirements.txt 2>/dev/null || true)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "environment_status",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": {
+      "task_description": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle using Gemini diagnosis (bug-fix template) and manual fixes (Codex only if explicitly needed)",
+      "test_fix_cycle": {
+        "max_iterations": 5,
+        "cycle_pattern": "test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if needed) → retest",
+        "tools": {
+          "test_execution": "bash(test_command)",
+          "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
+          "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex exec resume --last (if explicitly needed)",
+          "verification": "bash(test_command) + regression_check"
+        },
+        "exit_conditions": {
+          "success": "all_tests_pass",
+          "failure": "max_iterations_reached",
+          "error": "test_command_not_found"
+        }
+      },
+      "modification_points": [
+        "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
+        "  1.1. Discover test command from framework detection",
+        "  1.2. Execute initial test run: bash([test_command])",
+        "  1.3. Parse test output and count failures",
+        "  1.4. If all pass → Skip to PHASE 3 (success)",
+        "  1.5. If failures → Store failure output, proceed to PHASE 2",
+        "",
+        "PHASE 2: Iterative Test-Fix-Retest Cycle (max 5 iterations)",
+        "  Note: This phase handles test failures, NOT test generation failures",
+        "  Initialize: max_iterations=5, current_iteration=0",
+        "  ",
+        "  WHILE (tests failing AND current_iteration < max_iterations):",
+        "    current_iteration++",
+        "    ",
+        "    STEP 2.1: Gemini Diagnosis (using bug-fix template)",
+        "    - Prepare diagnosis context:",
+        "      * Test failure output from previous run",
+        "      * Source files from focus_paths",
+        "      * Implementation summaries from source session",
+        "    - Execute Gemini analysis with bug-fix template:",
+        "      bash(cd .workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p \"",
+        "      PURPOSE: Diagnose test failure iteration [N] and propose minimal fix",
+        "      TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations for test failure",
+        "      MODE: analysis",
+        "      CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}",
+        "               Test output: [test_failures]",
+        "               Source files: [focus_paths]",
+        "               Implementation: [implementation_context]",
+        "      EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes",
+        "      RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [test_failure_description]",
+        "             Minimal surgical fixes only - no refactoring",
+        "      \" > fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md)",
+        "    - Parse diagnosis → extract fix_suggestion and target_files",
+        "    - Present fix to user for manual application (default)",
+        "    ",
+        "    STEP 2.2: Apply Fix (Based on meta.use_codex Flag)",
+        "    ",
+        "    IF meta.use_codex = false (DEFAULT):",
+        "    - Present Gemini diagnosis to user for manual fix",
+        "    - User applies fix based on diagnosis recommendations",
+        "    - Stage changes: bash(git add -A)",
+        "    - Store fix log: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-changes.log",
+        "    ",
+        "    IF meta.use_codex = true (--use-codex flag present):",
+        "    - Stage current changes (if valid git repo): bash(git add -A)",
+        "    - First iteration: Start new Codex session",
+        "      codex -C [project_root] --full-auto exec \"",
+        "      PURPOSE: Fix test failure iteration 1",
+        "      TASK: [fix_suggestion from Gemini]",
+        "      MODE: write",
+        "      CONTEXT: Diagnosis: .workflow/.process/fix-iteration-1-diagnosis.md",
+        "               Target files: [target_files]",
+        "               Implementation context: [implementation_context]",
+        "      EXPECTED: Minimal code changes to resolve test failure",
+        "      RULES: Apply ONLY suggested changes, no refactoring",
+        "             Preserve existing code style",
+        "      \" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access",
+        "    - Subsequent iterations: Resume session for context continuity",
+        "      codex exec \"",
+        "      CONTINUE TO NEXT FIX:",
+        "      Iteration [N] of 5: Fix test failure",
+        "      ",
+        "      PURPOSE: Fix remaining test failures",
+        "      TASK: [fix_suggestion from Gemini iteration N]",
+        "      CONTEXT: Previous fixes applied, diagnosis: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md",
+        "      EXPECTED: Surgical fix for current failure",
+        "      RULES: Build on previous fixes, maintain consistency",
+        "      \" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access",
+        "    - Store fix log: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-changes.log",
+        "    ",
+        "    STEP 2.3: Retest and Verification",
+        "    - Re-execute test suite: bash([test_command])",
+        "    - Capture output: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-retest.log",
+        "    - Count failures: bash(grep -c 'FAIL\\|ERROR' .process/fix-iteration-[N]-retest.log)",
+        "    - Check for regression:",
+        "      IF new_failures > previous_failures:",
+        "        WARN: Regression detected",
+        "        Include in next Gemini diagnosis context",
+        "    - Analyze results:",
+        "      IF all_tests_pass:",
+        "        BREAK loop → Proceed to PHASE 3",
+        "      ELSE:",
+        "        Update test_failures context",
+        "        CONTINUE loop",
+        "  ",
+        "  IF max_iterations reached AND tests still failing:",
+        "    EXECUTE: git reset --hard HEAD (revert all changes)",
+        "    MARK: Task status = blocked",
+        "    GENERATE: Detailed failure report with iteration logs",
+        "    EXIT: Require manual intervention",
+        "",
+        "PHASE 3: Final Validation and Certification",
+        "  3.1. Execute final confirmation test run",
+        "  3.2. Generate success summary:",
+        "       - Iterations required: [current_iteration]",
+        "       - Fixes applied: [summary from iteration logs]",
+        "       - Test results: All passing ✅",
+        "  3.3. Mark task status: completed",
+        "  3.4. Update TODO_LIST.md: Mark as ✅",
+        "  3.5. Certify code: APPROVED for deployment"
+      ],
+      "logic_flow": [
+        "Load source session implementation context",
+        "Discover test framework and command",
+        "PHASE 0: Test Coverage Check",
+        "  Analyze existing test files",
+        "  Identify files without tests",
+        "  IF tests missing:",
+        "    Report to user (no automatic generation)",
+        "    Wait for user to generate tests or request automation",
+        "  ELSE:",
+        "    Skip to Phase 1",
+        "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
+        "  Execute test suite",
+        "  IF all pass → Success (Phase 3)",
+        "  ELSE → Store failures, proceed to Phase 2",
+        "PHASE 2: Iterative Fix Cycle (max 5 iterations)",
+        "  LOOP (max 5 times):",
+        "    1. Gemini diagnoses failure with bug-fix template → fix suggestion",
+        "    2. Check meta.use_codex flag:",
+        "       - IF false (default): Present fix to user for manual application",
+        "       - IF true (--use-codex): Codex applies fix with resume for continuity",
+        "    3. Retest and check results",
+        "    4. IF pass → Exit loop to Phase 3",
+        "    5. ELSE → Continue with updated context",
+        "  IF max iterations → Revert + report failure",
+        "PHASE 3: Final Validation",
+        "  Confirm all tests pass",
+        "  Generate summary (include test generation info)",
+        "  Certify code APPROVED"
+      ],
+      "error_handling": {
+        "max_iterations_reached": {
+          "action": "revert_all_changes",
+          "commands": [
+            "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
+            "bash(jq '.status = \"blocked\"' .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json > temp.json && mv temp.json .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json)"
+          ],
+          "report": "Generate failure report with iteration logs in .summaries/IMPL-001-failure-report.md"
+        },
+        "test_command_fails": {
+          "action": "treat_as_test_failure",
+          "context": "Use stderr as failure context for Gemini diagnosis"
+        },
+        "codex_apply_fails": {
+          "action": "retry_once_then_skip",
+          "fallback": "Mark iteration as skipped, continue to next"
+        },
+        "gemini_diagnosis_fails": {
+          "action": "retry_with_simplified_context",
+          "fallback": "Use previous diagnosis, continue"
+        },
+        "regression_detected": {
+          "action": "log_warning_continue",
+          "context": "Include regression info in next Gemini diagnosis"
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "target_files": [
+      "Auto-discovered from test failures",
+      "Extracted from Gemini diagnosis each iteration",
+      "Format: file:function:lines or file (for new files)"
+    ],
+    "codex_session": {
+      "strategy": "resume_for_continuity",
+      "first_iteration": "codex exec \"fix iteration 1\" --full-auto",
+      "subsequent_iterations": "codex exec \"fix iteration N\" resume --last",
+      "benefits": [
+        "Maintains conversation context across fixes",
+        "Remembers previous decisions and patterns",
+        "Ensures consistency in fix approach",
+        "Reduces redundant context injection"
+      ]
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+
+#### Document Structure
+```markdown
+---
+identifier: WFS-test-[session-id]
+source_session: WFS-[source-session-id]
+workflow_type: test_session
+test_framework: jest|pytest|cargo|detected
+---
+
+# Test Validation Plan: [Source Session Topic]
+
+## Summary
+Execute comprehensive test suite for implementation from session WFS-[source-session-id].
+Diagnose and fix all test failures using iterative Gemini analysis and Codex execution.
+
+## Source Session Context
+- **Implementation Session**: WFS-[source-session-id]
+- **Completed Tasks**: IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...
+- **Changed Files**: [list from git log]
+- **Implementation Summaries**: [references to source session summaries]
+
+## Test Framework
+- **Detected Framework**: jest|pytest|cargo|other
+- **Test Command**: npm test|pytest|cargo test
+- **Test Files**: [discovered test files]
+- **Coverage**: [estimated test coverage]
+
+## Test-Fix-Retest Cycle
+- **Max Iterations**: 5
+- **Diagnosis Tool**: Gemini (analysis mode with bug-fix template from bug-index.md)
+- **Fix Tool**: Manual (default, meta.use_codex=false) or Codex (if --use-codex flag, meta.use_codex=true)
+- **Verification**: Bash test execution + regression check
+
+### Cycle Workflow
+1. **Initial Test**: Execute full suite, capture failures
+2. **Iterative Fix Loop** (max 5 times):
+   - Gemini diagnoses failure using bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestion
+   - Check meta.use_codex flag:
+     - If false (default): Present fix to user for manual application
+     - If true (--use-codex): Codex applies fix with resume for context continuity
+   - Retest and verify (check for regressions)
+   - Continue until all pass or max iterations reached
+3. **Final Validation**: Confirm all tests pass, certify code
+
+### Error Recovery
+- **Max iterations reached**: Revert all changes, report failure
+- **Test command fails**: Treat as test failure, diagnose with Gemini
+- **Codex fails**: Retry once, skip iteration if still failing
+- **Regression detected**: Log warning, include in next diagnosis
+
+## Task Breakdown
+- **IMPL-001**: Execute and validate tests with iterative fix cycle
+
+## Implementation Strategy
+- **Phase 1**: Initial test execution and failure capture
+- **Phase 2**: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + Codex fix + retest
+- **Phase 3**: Final validation and code certification
+
+## Success Criteria
+- All tests pass (100% pass rate)
+- No test failures or errors in final run
+- Minimal, surgical code changes
+- Iteration logs document fix progression
+- Code certified APPROVED for deployment
+```
+
+### Phase 4: TODO_LIST.md Generation
+
+```markdown
+# Tasks: Test Validation for [Source Session]
+
+## Task Progress
+- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Execute and validate tests with iterative fix cycle → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
+
+## Execution Details
+- **Source Session**: WFS-[source-session-id]
+- **Test Framework**: jest|pytest|cargo
+- **Max Iterations**: 5
+- **Tools**: Gemini diagnosis + Codex resume fixes
+
+## Status Legend
+- `- [ ]` = Pending
+- `- [x]` = Completed
+```
+
+## Output Files Structure
+```
+.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/
+├── workflow-session.json           # Test session metadata
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                    # Test validation plan
+├── TODO_LIST.md                    # Progress tracking
+├── .task/
+│   └── IMPL-001.json               # Test-fix task with cycle spec
+├── .process/
+│   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md         # From concept-enhanced (optional)
+│   ├── context-package.json        # From context-gather
+│   ├── initial-test.log            # Phase 1: Initial test results
+│   ├── fix-iteration-1-diagnosis.md # Gemini diagnosis iteration 1
+│   ├── fix-iteration-1-changes.log  # Codex changes iteration 1
+│   ├── fix-iteration-1-retest.log   # Retest results iteration 1
+│   ├── fix-iteration-N-*.md/log    # Subsequent iterations
+│   └── final-test.log              # Phase 3: Final validation
+└── .summaries/
+    └── IMPL-001-summary.md         # Success report OR failure report
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Input Validation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Not a test session | Missing workflow_type: "test_session" | Verify session created by test-gen |
+| Source session not found | Invalid source_session_id | Check source session exists |
+| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Ensure source session has completed tasks |
+
+### Test Framework Discovery Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| No test command found | Unknown framework | Manual test command specification |
+| No test files found | Tests not written | Request user to write tests first |
+| Test dependencies missing | Incomplete setup | Run dependency installation |
+
+### Generation Errors
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Invalid JSON structure | Template error | Fix task generation logic |
+| Missing required fields | Incomplete metadata | Validate session metadata |
+
+## Integration & Usage
+
+### Command Chain
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4)
+- **Calls**: None (terminal command)
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute` (user-triggered)
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+# Manual fix mode (default)
+/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
+
+# Automated Codex fix mode
+/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+```
+
+### Flag Behavior
+- **No flag**: `meta.use_codex=false`, manual fixes presented to user
+- **--use-codex**: `meta.use_codex=true`, Codex automatically applies fixes with resume mechanism
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:test-gen` - Creates test session and calls this tool
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides cross-session context
+- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides test strategy analysis
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes the generated test-fix task
+- `@test-fix-agent` - Agent that executes the iterative test-fix cycle
+
+## Agent Execution Notes
+
+The `@test-fix-agent` will execute the task by following the `flow_control.implementation_approach` specification:
+
+1. **Load task JSON**: Read complete test-fix task from `.task/IMPL-002.json`
+2. **Check meta.use_codex**: Determine fix mode (manual or automated)
+3. **Execute pre_analysis**: Load source context, discover framework, analyze tests
+4. **Phase 1**: Run initial test suite
+5. **Phase 2**: If failures, enter iterative loop:
+   - Use Gemini for diagnosis (analysis mode with bug-fix template)
+   - Check meta.use_codex flag:
+     - If false (default): Present fix suggestions to user for manual application
+     - If true (--use-codex): Use Codex resume for automated fixes (maintains context)
+   - Retest and check for regressions
+   - Repeat max 5 times
+6. **Phase 3**: Generate summary and certify code
+7. **Error Recovery**: Revert changes if max iterations reached
+
+**Bug Diagnosis Template**: Uses bug-fix.md template as referenced in bug-index.md for systematic root cause analysis, code path tracing, and targeted fix recommendations.
+
+**Codex Usage**: The agent uses `codex exec "..." resume --last` pattern ONLY when meta.use_codex=true (--use-codex flag present) to maintain conversation context across multiple fix iterations, ensuring consistency and learning from previous attempts.

.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md

@@ -1,10 +1,3 @@
----
-name: plan
-description: 软件架构规划和技术实现计划分析模板
-category: planning
-keywords: [规划, 架构, 实现计划, 技术设计, 修改方案]
----
-
 # 软件架构规划模板
 # AI Persona & Core Mission
 

.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh

@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
 #!/bin/bash
 # Update CLAUDE.md for a specific module with automatic layer detection
-# Usage: update_module_claude.sh <module_path> [update_type]
+# Usage: update_module_claude.sh <module_path> [update_type] [tool]
 #   module_path: Path to the module directory
 #   update_type: full|related (default: full)
+#   tool: gemini|qwen|codex (default: gemini)
 #   Script automatically detects layer depth and selects appropriate template
 
 update_module_claude() {
     local module_path="$1"
     local update_type="${2:-full}"
+    local tool="${3:-gemini}"
     
     # Validate parameters
     if [ -z "$module_path" ]; then
@@ -40,30 +42,30 @@ update_module_claude() {
     if [ "$module_path" = "." ]; then
         # Root directory
         layer="Layer 1 (Root)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/dms/claude-layer1-root.txt"
+        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer1-root.txt"
         analysis_strategy="--all-files"
     elif [[ "$clean_path" =~ ^[^/]+$ ]]; then
         # Top-level directories (e.g., .claude, src, tests)
         layer="Layer 2 (Domain)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/dms/claude-layer2-domain.txt"
+        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer2-domain.txt"
         analysis_strategy="@{*/CLAUDE.md}"
     elif [[ "$clean_path" =~ ^[^/]+/[^/]+$ ]]; then
         # Second-level directories (e.g., .claude/scripts, src/components)
         layer="Layer 3 (Module)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/dms/claude-layer3-module.txt"
+        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer3-module.txt"
         analysis_strategy="@{*/CLAUDE.md}"
     else
         # Deeper directories (e.g., .claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts)
         layer="Layer 4 (Sub-Module)"
-        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/dms/claude-layer4-submodule.txt"
+        template_path="$HOME/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/claude-layer4-submodule.txt"
         analysis_strategy="--all-files"
     fi
     
     # Prepare logging info
     local module_name=$(basename "$module_path")
-    
+
     echo "⚡ Updating: $module_path"
-    echo "   Layer: $layer | Type: $update_type | Files: $file_count"
+    echo "   Layer: $layer | Type: $update_type | Tool: $tool | Files: $file_count"
     echo "   Template: $(basename "$template_path") | Strategy: $analysis_strategy"
     
     # Generate prompt with template injection
@@ -106,31 +108,50 @@ update_module_claude() {
     # Execute update
     local start_time=$(date +%s)
     echo "   🔄 Starting update..."
-    
+
     if cd "$module_path" 2>/dev/null; then
-        # Execute gemini command with layer-specific analysis strategy
-        local gemini_result=0
-        if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
-            gemini --all-files --yolo -p "$base_prompt
+        local tool_result=0
+        local final_prompt="$base_prompt
 
         Module Information:
         - Name: $module_name
         - Path: $module_path
         - Layer: $layer
-        - Analysis Strategy: $analysis_strategy" 2>&1
-            gemini_result=$?
-        else
-            gemini --yolo -p "$analysis_strategy $base_prompt
+        - Tool: $tool
+        - Analysis Strategy: $analysis_strategy"
 
-        Module Information:
-        - Name: $module_name
-        - Path: $module_path
-        - Layer: $layer
-        - Analysis Strategy: $analysis_strategy" 2>&1
-            gemini_result=$?
-        fi
-        
-        if [ $gemini_result -eq 0 ]; then
+        # Execute with selected tool
+        case "$tool" in
+            qwen)
+                if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
+                    qwen --all-files --yolo -p "$final_prompt" 2>&1
+                    tool_result=$?
+                else
+                    qwen --yolo -p "$analysis_strategy $final_prompt" 2>&1
+                    tool_result=$?
+                fi
+                ;;
+            codex)
+                if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
+                    codex --full-auto exec "$final_prompt" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access 2>&1
+                    tool_result=$?
+                else
+                    codex --full-auto exec "$final_prompt CONTEXT: $analysis_strategy" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access 2>&1
+                    tool_result=$?
+                fi
+                ;;
+            gemini|*)
+                if [ "$analysis_strategy" = "--all-files" ]; then
+                    gemini --all-files --yolo -p "$final_prompt" 2>&1
+                    tool_result=$?
+                else
+                    gemini --yolo -p "$analysis_strategy $final_prompt" 2>&1
+                    tool_result=$?
+                fi
+                ;;
+        esac
+
+        if [ $tool_result -eq 0 ]; then
             local end_time=$(date +%s)
             local duration=$((end_time - start_time))
             echo "   ✅ Completed in ${duration}s"

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+# API-Level Documentation Template
+
+Generate comprehensive API documentation following this structure:
+
+## Overview
+[Brief description of the API's purpose and capabilities]
+
+## Authentication
+### Authentication Method
+[e.g., JWT, OAuth2, API Keys]
+
+### Obtaining Credentials
+```bash
+# Example authentication flow
+```
+
+### Using Credentials
+```http
+GET /api/resource HTTP/1.1
+Authorization: Bearer <token>
+```
+
+---
+
+## Base URL
+```
+Production: https://api.example.com/v1
+Staging: https://staging.api.example.com/v1
+```
+
+## Common Response Codes
+| Code | Description |
+|------|-------------|
+| 200  | Success |
+| 201  | Created |
+| 400  | Bad Request |
+| 401  | Unauthorized |
+| 403  | Forbidden |
+| 404  | Not Found |
+| 500  | Internal Server Error |
+
+---
+
+## Endpoints
+
+### Resource: Users
+
+#### GET /users
+**Description**: Retrieves a paginated list of users.
+
+**Query Parameters**:
+| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
+|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
+| `limit` | number | No | Number of results (default: 20, max: 100) |
+| `offset` | number | No | Pagination offset (default: 0) |
+| `sort` | string | No | Sort field (e.g., `name`, `-created_at`) |
+
+**Example Request**:
+```http
+GET /users?limit=10&offset=0&sort=-created_at HTTP/1.1
+Authorization: Bearer <token>
+```
+
+**Response (200 OK)**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": [
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "name": "John Doe",
+      "email": "john@example.com",
+      "created_at": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "pagination": {
+    "total": 100,
+    "limit": 10,
+    "offset": 0
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Error Response (401 Unauthorized)**:
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "UNAUTHORIZED",
+    "message": "Invalid or expired token"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+#### GET /users/:id
+**Description**: Retrieves a single user by ID.
+
+**Path Parameters**:
+| Parameter | Type | Description |
+|-----------|------|-------------|
+| `id` | number | User ID |
+
+**Example Request**:
+```http
+GET /users/123 HTTP/1.1
+Authorization: Bearer <token>
+```
+
+**Response (200 OK)**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": 123,
+  "name": "John Doe",
+  "email": "john@example.com",
+  "created_at": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+  "updated_at": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+#### POST /users
+**Description**: Creates a new user.
+
+**Request Body**:
+```json
+{
+  "name": "Jane Smith",
+  "email": "jane@example.com",
+  "password": "securePassword123"
+}
+```
+
+**Validation Rules**:
+- `name`: Required, 2-100 characters
+- `email`: Required, valid email format, must be unique
+- `password`: Required, minimum 8 characters
+
+**Response (201 Created)**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": 124,
+  "name": "Jane Smith",
+  "email": "jane@example.com",
+  "created_at": "2024-01-20T12:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+**Error Response (400 Bad Request)**:
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
+    "message": "Validation failed",
+    "details": [
+      {
+        "field": "email",
+        "message": "Email already exists"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+#### PUT /users/:id
+**Description**: Updates an existing user.
+
+**Path Parameters**:
+| Parameter | Type | Description |
+|-----------|------|-------------|
+| `id` | number | User ID |
+
+**Request Body** (all fields optional):
+```json
+{
+  "name": "Jane Doe",
+  "email": "jane.doe@example.com"
+}
+```
+
+**Response (200 OK)**:
+```json
+{
+  "id": 124,
+  "name": "Jane Doe",
+  "email": "jane.doe@example.com",
+  "updated_at": "2024-01-21T09:15:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+#### DELETE /users/:id
+**Description**: Deletes a user.
+
+**Path Parameters**:
+| Parameter | Type | Description |
+|-----------|------|-------------|
+| `id` | number | User ID |
+
+**Response (204 No Content)**:
+[Empty response body]
+
+---
+
+## Rate Limiting
+- **Limit**: 1000 requests per hour per API key
+- **Headers**:
+  - `X-RateLimit-Limit`: Total requests allowed
+  - `X-RateLimit-Remaining`: Requests remaining
+  - `X-RateLimit-Reset`: Unix timestamp when limit resets
+
+---
+
+## SDKs and Client Libraries
+- [JavaScript/TypeScript SDK](./sdks/javascript.md)
+- [Python SDK](./sdks/python.md)
+
+---
+
+## Webhooks
+[Description of webhook system if applicable]
+
+---
+
+## Changelog
+### v1.1.0 (2024-01-20)
+- Added user sorting functionality
+- Improved error messages
+
+### v1.0.0 (2024-01-01)
+- Initial API release
+
+---
+
+**API Version**: 1.1.0
+**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
+**Support**: api-support@example.com

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+# Module-Level Documentation Template
+
+Generate detailed module documentation following this structure:
+
+## 1. Purpose and Responsibilities
+[What this module does, its boundaries, and its role in the larger system]
+
+## 2. Internal Architecture
+- **Key Components**:
+  - [Component 1]: [Description and responsibility]
+  - [Component 2]: [Description and responsibility]
+- **Data Flow**: [How data moves through the module, with diagrams if applicable]
+- **Core Logic**: [Explanation of the main business logic and algorithms]
+- **State Management**: [How state is managed within the module]
+
+## 3. Public API / Interface
+### Exported Functions
+```typescript
+/**
+ * Function description
+ * @param param1 - Parameter description
+ * @returns Return value description
+ */
+export function exampleFunction(param1: Type): ReturnType;
+```
+
+### Exported Classes
+```typescript
+/**
+ * Class description
+ */
+export class ExampleClass {
+  // Public methods and properties
+}
+```
+
+### Usage Examples
+```typescript
+import { exampleFunction } from './module';
+
+// Example 1: Basic usage
+const result = exampleFunction(input);
+
+// Example 2: Advanced usage
+// ...
+```
+
+## 4. Dependencies
+### Internal Dependencies
+- **[Module A]**: [Why this dependency exists, what it provides]
+- **[Module B]**: [Purpose of dependency]
+
+### External Dependencies
+- **[Library 1]** (`version`): [Purpose and usage]
+- **[Library 2]** (`version`): [Purpose and usage]
+
+## 5. Configuration
+### Environment Variables
+- `ENV_VAR_NAME`: [Description, default value]
+
+### Configuration Options
+```typescript
+interface ModuleConfig {
+  option1: Type; // Description
+  option2: Type; // Description
+}
+```
+
+## 6. Testing
+### Running Tests
+```bash
+npm test -- module-name
+```
+
+### Test Coverage
+- Unit tests: [Coverage percentage or key test files]
+- Integration tests: [Coverage or test scenarios]
+
+## 7. Common Use Cases
+1. **Use Case 1**: [Description and code example]
+2. **Use Case 2**: [Description and code example]
+
+## 8. Troubleshooting
+### Common Issues
+- **Issue 1**: [Description and solution]
+- **Issue 2**: [Description and solution]
+
+---
+**Module Path**: [File path]
+**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
+**Owner/Maintainer**: [Team or individual]

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# Project-Level Documentation Template
+
+Generate comprehensive project documentation following this structure:
+
+## 1. Overview
+- **Purpose**: [High-level mission and goals of the project]
+- **Target Audience**: [Primary users, developers, stakeholders]
+- **Key Features**: [List of major functionalities and capabilities]
+
+## 2. System Architecture
+- **Architectural Style**: [e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Layered, Event-Driven]
+- **Core Components**: [Diagram or list of major system parts and their interactions]
+- **Technology Stack**:
+  - Languages: [Programming languages used]
+  - Frameworks: [Key frameworks and libraries]
+  - Databases: [Data storage solutions]
+  - Infrastructure: [Deployment and hosting]
+- **Design Principles**: [Guiding principles like SOLID, DRY, separation of concerns]
+
+## 3. Getting Started
+- **Prerequisites**: [Required software, tools, versions]
+- **Installation**:
+  ```bash
+  # Installation commands
+  ```
+- **Configuration**: [Environment setup, config files]
+- **Running the Project**:
+  ```bash
+  # Startup commands
+  ```
+
+## 4. Development Workflow
+- **Branching Strategy**: [e.g., GitFlow, trunk-based]
+- **Coding Standards**: [Style guide, linting rules]
+- **Testing**:
+  ```bash
+  # Test commands
+  ```
+- **Build & Deployment**: [CI/CD pipeline overview]
+
+## 5. Project Structure
+```
+project-root/
+├── src/           # [Description]
+├── tests/         # [Description]
+├── docs/          # [Description]
+└── config/        # [Description]
+```
+
+## 6. Navigation
+- [Module Documentation](./modules/)
+- [API Reference](./api/)
+- [Architecture Details](./architecture/)
+- [Contributing Guidelines](./CONTRIBUTING.md)
+
+---
+**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
+**Documentation Version**: [Project version]

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/memory/hierarchy-analysis.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Analyze project structure for DMS hierarchy optimization:
+Analyze project structure for memory hierarchy optimization:
 
 ## Required Analysis:
 1. Assess project complexity and file organization patterns

.claude/workflows/design-tokens-schema.md

@@ -0,0 +1,534 @@
+---
+name: design-tokens-schema
+description: Design tokens JSON schema specification for UI design workflow
+type: specification
+---
+
+# Design Tokens Schema Specification
+
+## Overview
+Standardized JSON schema for design tokens used in `/workflow:design/*` commands. Ensures consistency across style extraction, consolidation, and UI generation phases.
+
+## Core Principles
+
+1. **OKLCH Color Format**: All colors use OKLCH color space for perceptual uniformity
+2. **Semantic Naming**: User-centric token names (brand-primary, surface-elevated, not color-1, bg-2)
+3. **rem-Based Sizing**: All spacing and typography use rem units for scalability
+4. **Comprehensive Coverage**: Complete token set for production-ready design systems
+5. **Accessibility First**: WCAG AA compliance validated and documented
+
+## Full Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "title": "Design Tokens",
+  "description": "Design token definitions for UI design workflow",
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": ["colors", "typography", "spacing", "border_radius", "shadow"],
+  "properties": {
+    "meta": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "properties": {
+        "version": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"},
+        "generated_at": {"type": "string", "format": "date-time"},
+        "session_id": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^WFS-"},
+        "description": {"type": "string"}
+      }
+    },
+    "colors": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": ["brand", "surface", "semantic", "text"],
+      "properties": {
+        "brand": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "description": "Brand identity colors",
+          "required": ["primary", "secondary"],
+          "properties": {
+            "primary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "secondary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "accent": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
+          }
+        },
+        "surface": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "description": "Surface and background colors",
+          "required": ["background", "elevated"],
+          "properties": {
+            "background": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "elevated": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "sunken": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "overlay": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
+          }
+        },
+        "semantic": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "description": "Semantic state colors",
+          "required": ["success", "warning", "error", "info"],
+          "properties": {
+            "success": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "warning": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "error": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "info": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
+          }
+        },
+        "text": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "description": "Text colors with WCAG AA validated contrast",
+          "required": ["primary", "secondary"],
+          "properties": {
+            "primary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "secondary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "tertiary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "inverse": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "disabled": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
+          }
+        },
+        "border": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "description": "Border and divider colors",
+          "properties": {
+            "subtle": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "default": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
+            "strong": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "typography": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": ["font_family", "font_size", "line_height", "font_weight"],
+      "properties": {
+        "font_family": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "required": ["heading", "body"],
+          "properties": {
+            "heading": {"type": "string"},
+            "body": {"type": "string"},
+            "mono": {"type": "string"}
+          }
+        },
+        "font_size": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "required": ["xs", "sm", "base", "lg", "xl", "2xl", "3xl", "4xl"],
+          "properties": {
+            "xs": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "sm": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "base": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "lg": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "2xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "3xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "4xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+            "5xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"}
+          }
+        },
+        "line_height": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "required": ["tight", "normal", "relaxed"],
+          "properties": {
+            "tight": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$"},
+            "normal": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$"},
+            "relaxed": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$"}
+          }
+        },
+        "font_weight": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "properties": {
+            "light": {"type": "integer", "enum": [300]},
+            "normal": {"type": "integer", "enum": [400]},
+            "medium": {"type": "integer", "enum": [500]},
+            "semibold": {"type": "integer", "enum": [600]},
+            "bold": {"type": "integer", "enum": [700]}
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "spacing": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "description": "Spacing scale (rem-based)",
+      "required": ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "6", "8"],
+      "patternProperties": {
+        "^\\d+$": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"}
+      }
+    },
+    "border_radius": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": ["none", "sm", "md", "lg", "full"],
+      "properties": {
+        "none": {"type": "string", "const": "0"},
+        "sm": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+        "md": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+        "lg": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+        "xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+        "2xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
+        "full": {"type": "string", "const": "9999px"}
+      }
+    },
+    "shadow": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": ["sm", "md", "lg"],
+      "properties": {
+        "none": {"type": "string", "const": "none"},
+        "sm": {"type": "string"},
+        "md": {"type": "string"},
+        "lg": {"type": "string"},
+        "xl": {"type": "string"},
+        "2xl": {"type": "string"}
+      }
+    },
+    "breakpoint": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "description": "Responsive breakpoints",
+      "properties": {
+        "sm": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
+        "md": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
+        "lg": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
+        "xl": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
+        "2xl": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"}
+      }
+    },
+    "accessibility": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "description": "WCAG AA compliance data",
+      "properties": {
+        "contrast_ratios": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "patternProperties": {
+            ".*": {
+              "type": "object",
+              "properties": {
+                "background": {"type": "string"},
+                "foreground": {"type": "string"},
+                "ratio": {"type": "number"},
+                "wcag_aa_pass": {"type": "boolean"},
+                "wcag_aaa_pass": {"type": "boolean"}
+              }
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "definitions": {
+    "color": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "pattern": "^oklch\\(\\s*\\d+(\\.\\d+)?\\s+\\d+(\\.\\d+)?\\s+\\d+(\\.\\d+)?\\s*(\\/\\s*\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)?\\s*\\)$",
+      "description": "OKLCH color format: oklch(L C H / A)"
+    },
+    "size_rem": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?rem$",
+      "description": "rem-based size value"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Example: Complete Design Tokens
+
+```json
+{
+  "meta": {
+    "version": "1.0.0",
+    "generated_at": "2025-10-05T15:30:00Z",
+    "session_id": "WFS-auth-dashboard",
+    "description": "Modern minimalist design system with high contrast"
+  },
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {
+      "primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
+      "secondary": "oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / 1)",
+      "accent": "oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / 1)"
+    },
+    "surface": {
+      "background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
+      "elevated": "oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / 1)",
+      "sunken": "oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / 1)",
+      "overlay": "oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.5)"
+    },
+    "semantic": {
+      "success": "oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / 1)",
+      "warning": "oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / 1)",
+      "error": "oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / 1)",
+      "info": "oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / 1)"
+    },
+    "text": {
+      "primary": "oklch(0.20 0.02 270 / 1)",
+      "secondary": "oklch(0.45 0.02 270 / 1)",
+      "tertiary": "oklch(0.60 0.02 270 / 1)",
+      "inverse": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
+      "disabled": "oklch(0.70 0.01 270 / 0.5)"
+    },
+    "border": {
+      "subtle": "oklch(0.90 0.01 270 / 1)",
+      "default": "oklch(0.80 0.02 270 / 1)",
+      "strong": "oklch(0.60 0.05 270 / 1)"
+    }
+  },
+  "typography": {
+    "font_family": {
+      "heading": "Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, sans-serif",
+      "body": "Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, sans-serif",
+      "mono": "Fira Code, Consolas, monospace"
+    },
+    "font_size": {
+      "xs": "0.75rem",
+      "sm": "0.875rem",
+      "base": "1rem",
+      "lg": "1.125rem",
+      "xl": "1.25rem",
+      "2xl": "1.5rem",
+      "3xl": "1.875rem",
+      "4xl": "2.25rem",
+      "5xl": "3rem"
+    },
+    "line_height": {
+      "tight": "1.25",
+      "normal": "1.5",
+      "relaxed": "1.75"
+    },
+    "font_weight": {
+      "light": 300,
+      "normal": 400,
+      "medium": 500,
+      "semibold": 600,
+      "bold": 700
+    }
+  },
+  "spacing": {
+    "0": "0",
+    "1": "0.25rem",
+    "2": "0.5rem",
+    "3": "0.75rem",
+    "4": "1rem",
+    "5": "1.25rem",
+    "6": "1.5rem",
+    "8": "2rem",
+    "10": "2.5rem",
+    "12": "3rem",
+    "16": "4rem",
+    "20": "5rem",
+    "24": "6rem"
+  },
+  "border_radius": {
+    "none": "0",
+    "sm": "0.25rem",
+    "md": "0.5rem",
+    "lg": "0.75rem",
+    "xl": "1rem",
+    "2xl": "1.5rem",
+    "full": "9999px"
+  },
+  "shadow": {
+    "none": "none",
+    "sm": "0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
+    "md": "0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06)",
+    "lg": "0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
+    "xl": "0 20px 25px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.15), 0 10px 10px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.04)",
+    "2xl": "0 25px 50px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.25)"
+  },
+  "breakpoint": {
+    "sm": "640px",
+    "md": "768px",
+    "lg": "1024px",
+    "xl": "1280px",
+    "2xl": "1536px"
+  },
+  "accessibility": {
+    "contrast_ratios": {
+      "text_primary_on_background": {
+        "background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
+        "foreground": "oklch(0.20 0.02 270 / 1)",
+        "ratio": 14.2,
+        "wcag_aa_pass": true,
+        "wcag_aaa_pass": true
+      },
+      "brand_primary_on_background": {
+        "background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
+        "foreground": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
+        "ratio": 6.8,
+        "wcag_aa_pass": true,
+        "wcag_aaa_pass": false
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## CSS Custom Properties Generation
+
+Design tokens should be converted to CSS custom properties for use in generated UI:
+
+```css
+:root {
+  /* Brand Colors */
+  --color-brand-primary: oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1);
+  --color-brand-secondary: oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / 1);
+  --color-brand-accent: oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / 1);
+
+  /* Surface Colors */
+  --color-surface-background: oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1);
+  --color-surface-elevated: oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / 1);
+  --color-surface-sunken: oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / 1);
+
+  /* Semantic Colors */
+  --color-semantic-success: oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / 1);
+  --color-semantic-warning: oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / 1);
+  --color-semantic-error: oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / 1);
+  --color-semantic-info: oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / 1);
+
+  /* Text Colors */
+  --color-text-primary: oklch(0.20 0.02 270 / 1);
+  --color-text-secondary: oklch(0.45 0.02 270 / 1);
+  --color-text-tertiary: oklch(0.60 0.02 270 / 1);
+
+  /* Typography */
+  --font-family-heading: Inter, system-ui, sans-serif;
+  --font-family-body: Inter, system-ui, sans-serif;
+  --font-family-mono: Fira Code, Consolas, monospace;
+
+  --font-size-xs: 0.75rem;
+  --font-size-sm: 0.875rem;
+  --font-size-base: 1rem;
+  --font-size-lg: 1.125rem;
+  --font-size-xl: 1.25rem;
+  --font-size-2xl: 1.5rem;
+  --font-size-3xl: 1.875rem;
+  --font-size-4xl: 2.25rem;
+
+  --line-height-tight: 1.25;
+  --line-height-normal: 1.5;
+  --line-height-relaxed: 1.75;
+
+  /* Spacing */
+  --spacing-0: 0;
+  --spacing-1: 0.25rem;
+  --spacing-2: 0.5rem;
+  --spacing-3: 0.75rem;
+  --spacing-4: 1rem;
+  --spacing-6: 1.5rem;
+  --spacing-8: 2rem;
+  --spacing-12: 3rem;
+  --spacing-16: 4rem;
+
+  /* Border Radius */
+  --border-radius-none: 0;
+  --border-radius-sm: 0.25rem;
+  --border-radius-md: 0.5rem;
+  --border-radius-lg: 0.75rem;
+  --border-radius-xl: 1rem;
+  --border-radius-full: 9999px;
+
+  /* Shadows */
+  --shadow-sm: 0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05);
+  --shadow-md: 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06);
+  --shadow-lg: 0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05);
+}
+```
+
+## Tailwind Configuration Generation
+
+```javascript
+// tailwind.config.js
+module.exports = {
+  theme: {
+    extend: {
+      colors: {
+        brand: {
+          primary: 'oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / <alpha-value>)',
+          secondary: 'oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / <alpha-value>)',
+          accent: 'oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / <alpha-value>)'
+        },
+        surface: {
+          background: 'oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / <alpha-value>)',
+          elevated: 'oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / <alpha-value>)',
+          sunken: 'oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / <alpha-value>)'
+        },
+        semantic: {
+          success: 'oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / <alpha-value>)',
+          warning: 'oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / <alpha-value>)',
+          error: 'oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / <alpha-value>)',
+          info: 'oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / <alpha-value>)'
+        }
+      },
+      fontFamily: {
+        heading: ['Inter', 'system-ui', 'sans-serif'],
+        body: ['Inter', 'system-ui', 'sans-serif'],
+        mono: ['Fira Code', 'Consolas', 'monospace']
+      },
+      fontSize: {
+        'xs': '0.75rem',
+        'sm': '0.875rem',
+        'base': '1rem',
+        'lg': '1.125rem',
+        'xl': '1.25rem',
+        '2xl': '1.5rem',
+        '3xl': '1.875rem',
+        '4xl': '2.25rem'
+      },
+      spacing: {
+        '1': '0.25rem',
+        '2': '0.5rem',
+        '3': '0.75rem',
+        '4': '1rem',
+        '6': '1.5rem',
+        '8': '2rem',
+        '12': '3rem',
+        '16': '4rem'
+      },
+      borderRadius: {
+        'sm': '0.25rem',
+        'md': '0.5rem',
+        'lg': '0.75rem',
+        'xl': '1rem',
+        '2xl': '1.5rem'
+      },
+      boxShadow: {
+        'sm': '0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)',
+        'md': '0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06)',
+        'lg': '0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)'
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Validation Requirements
+
+### Color Validation
+- All colors MUST use OKLCH format
+- Alpha channel optional (defaults to 1)
+- Lightness: 0-1 (0% to 100%)
+- Chroma: 0-0.4 (typical range, can exceed for vibrant colors)
+- Hue: 0-360 (degrees)
+
+### Accessibility Validation
+- Text on background: minimum 4.5:1 contrast (WCAG AA)
+- Large text (18pt+ or 14pt+ bold): minimum 3:1 contrast
+- UI components: minimum 3:1 contrast
+- Non-text focus indicators: minimum 3:1 contrast
+
+### Consistency Validation
+- Spacing scale maintains consistent ratio (e.g., 1.5x or 2x progression)
+- Typography scale follows modular scale principles
+- Border radius values progress logically
+- Shadow layers increase in offset and blur systematically
+
+## Usage in Commands
+
+### style-extract Output
+Generates initial `design-tokens.json` from visual analysis
+
+### style-consolidate Output
+Finalizes validated `design-tokens.json` with accessibility data
+
+### ui-generate Input
+Reads `design-tokens.json` to generate CSS custom properties
+
+### design-update Integration
+References `design-tokens.json` path in synthesis-specification.md
+
+## Version History
+
+- **1.0.0**: Initial schema with OKLCH colors, semantic naming, WCAG AA validation

.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md

@@ -6,11 +6,22 @@ type: strategic-guideline
 
 # Intelligent Tools Selection Strategy
 
+## 📋 Table of Contents
+1. [Core Framework](#-core-framework)
+2. [Tool Specifications](#-tool-specifications)
+3. [Command Templates](#-command-templates)
+4. [Tool Selection Guide](#-tool-selection-guide)
+5. [Usage Patterns](#-usage-patterns)
+6. [Best Practices](#-best-practices)
+
+---
+
 ## ⚡ Core Framework
 
-**Gemini**: Analysis, understanding, exploration & documentation
-**Qwen**: Architecture analysis, code generation & implementation
-**Codex**: Development, implementation & automation
+### Tool Overview
+- **Gemini**: Analysis, understanding, exploration & documentation
+- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, code generation & implementation
+- **Codex**: Development, implementation & automation
 
 ### Decision Principles
 - **Use tools early and often** - Tools are faster, more thorough, and reliable than manual approaches
@@ -18,6 +29,7 @@ type: strategic-guideline
 - **Default to tools** - Use specialized tools for most coding tasks, no matter how small
 - **Lower barriers** - Engage tools immediately when encountering any complexity
 - **Context optimization** - Based on user intent, determine whether to use `-C [directory]` parameter for focused analysis to reduce irrelevant context import
+- **⚠️ Write operation protection** - For local codebase write/modify operations, require EXPLICIT user confirmation unless user provides clear instructions containing MODE=write or MODE=auto
 
 ### Quick Decision Rules
 1. **Exploring/Understanding?** → Start with Gemini
@@ -26,32 +38,118 @@ type: strategic-guideline
 4. **Not sure?** → Use multiple tools in parallel
 5. **Small task?** → Still use tools - they're faster than manual work
 
-### Core Execution Rules
-- **Default Timeout**: Bash commands default execution time = 20 minutes (1200000ms)
-- **Apply to All Tools**: All bash() wrapped commands including Gemini, Qwen wrapper and Codex executions use this timeout
-- **Command Examples**: `bash(cd target/directory && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "prompt")`, `bash(cd target/directory && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "prompt")`, `bash(codex -C directory --full-auto exec "task")`
-- **Override When Needed**: Specify custom timeout for longer operations
+---
 
-### Permission Framework
-- **Gemini/Qwen Write Access**: Use `--approval-mode yolo` when tools need to create/modify files
-- **Codex Write Access**: Always use `-s danger-full-access` and `--skip-git-repo-check` for development and file operations
-- **Auto-approval Protocol**: Enable automatic tool approvals for autonomous workflow execution
+## 🎯 Tool Specifications
 
-## 🎯 Universal Command Template
+### Gemini
+- **Command**: `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper`
+- **Strengths**: Large context window, pattern recognition
+- **Best For**: Analysis, documentation generation, code exploration
+- **Permissions**: Default read-only analysis, MODE=write requires explicit specification (auto-enables --approval-mode yolo)
+- **Default MODE**: `analysis` (read-only)
+- **⚠️ Write Trigger**: Only when user explicitly requests "generate documentation", "modify code", or specifies MODE=write
 
-### Standard Format (REQUIRED)
+#### MODE Options
+- `analysis` (default) - Read-only analysis and documentation generation
+- `write` - ⚠️ Create/modify codebase files (requires explicit specification, auto-enables --approval-mode yolo)
+
+### Qwen
+- **Command**: `~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper`
+- **Strengths**: Architecture analysis, pattern recognition
+- **Best For**: System design analysis, architectural review
+- **Permissions**: Architecture analysis only, no automatic code generation
+- **Default MODE**: `analysis` (read-only)
+- **⚠️ Write Trigger**: Explicitly prohibited from auto-calling write mode
+
+#### MODE Options
+- `analysis` (default) - Architecture analysis only, no code generation/modification (read-only)
+- `write` - ⚠️ Code generation (requires explicit specification, disabled by default)
+
+### Codex
+- **Command**: `codex --full-auto exec`
+- **Strengths**: Autonomous development, mathematical reasoning
+- **Best For**: Implementation, testing, automation
+- **Permissions**: Requires explicit MODE=auto or MODE=write specification
+- **Default MODE**: No default, must be explicitly specified
+- **⚠️ Write Trigger**: Only when user explicitly requests "implement", "modify", "generate code" AND specifies MODE
+
+#### MODE Options
+- `auto` - ⚠️ Autonomous development with full file operations (requires explicit specification, enables -s danger-full-access)
+- `write` - ⚠️ Test generation and file modification (requires explicit specification)
+- **Default**: No default mode, MODE must be explicitly specified
+
+#### Session Management
+- `codex resume` - Resume previous interactive session (picker by default)
+- `codex exec "task" resume --last` - Continue most recent session with new task (maintains context)
+- `codex -i <image_file>` - Attach image(s) to initial prompt (useful for UI/design references)
+- **Multi-task Pattern**: First task uses `exec`, subsequent tasks use `exec "..." resume --last` for context continuity
+  - **Parameter Position**: `resume --last` must be placed AFTER the prompt string at command END
+  - **Example**:
+    ```bash
+    # First task - establish session
+    codex -C project --full-auto exec "Implement auth module" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+    # Subsequent tasks - continue same session
+    codex --full-auto exec "Add JWT validation" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+    codex --full-auto exec "Write auth tests" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+    ```
+
+#### Auto-Resume Decision Rules
+**When to use `resume --last`**:
+- Current task is related to/extends previous Codex task in conversation memory
+- Current task requires context from previous implementation
+- Current task is part of multi-step workflow (e.g., implement → enhance → test)
+- Session memory indicates recent Codex execution on same module/feature
+
+**When NOT to use `resume --last`**:
+- First Codex task in conversation
+- New independent task unrelated to previous work
+- Switching to different module/feature area
+- No recent Codex task in conversation memory
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Command Templates
+
+### Universal Template Structure
+Every command MUST follow this structure:
+- [ ] **PURPOSE** - Clear goal and intent
+- [ ] **TASK** - Specific execution task
+- [ ] **MODE** - Execution mode and permission level
+- [ ] **CONTEXT** - File references and memory context from previous sessions
+- [ ] **EXPECTED** - Clear expected results
+- [ ] **RULES** - Template reference and constraints
+
+### Standard Command Formats
+
+#### Gemini Commands
 ```bash
-# Gemini Analysis (全权限)
+# Gemini Analysis (read-only, default)
 cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
 PURPOSE: [clear analysis goal]
 TASK: [specific analysis task]
-MODE: [analysis|write]
+MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
 EXPECTED: [expected output]
 RULES: [template reference and constraints]
 "
 
-# Qwen Architecture Analysis (仅分析)
+# Gemini Write Mode (requires explicit MODE=write)
+# NOTE: --approval-mode yolo must be placed AFTER wrapper command, BEFORE -p
+cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
+PURPOSE: [clear goal]
+TASK: [specific task]
+MODE: write
+CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
+EXPECTED: [expected output]
+RULES: [template reference and constraints]
+"
+```
+
+#### Qwen Commands
+```bash
+# Qwen Architecture Analysis (read-only, default)
 cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
 PURPOSE: [clear architecture goal]
 TASK: [specific analysis task]
@@ -61,41 +159,44 @@ EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
 RULES: [template reference and constraints]
 "
 
-# Codex Development
+# Qwen Write Mode (requires explicit MODE=write)
+# NOTE: --approval-mode yolo must be placed AFTER wrapper command, BEFORE -p
+cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
+PURPOSE: [clear goal]
+TASK: [specific task]
+MODE: write
+CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
+EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
+RULES: [template reference and constraints]
+"
+```
+
+#### Codex Commands
+```bash
+# Codex Development (requires explicit MODE=auto)
+# NOTE: --skip-git-repo-check and -s danger-full-access must be placed at command END
 codex -C [directory] --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: [clear development goal]
 TASK: [specific development task]
-MODE: [auto|write]
+MODE: auto
+CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
+EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
+RULES: [template reference and constraints]
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+# Codex Test/Write Mode (requires explicit MODE=write)
+# NOTE: --skip-git-repo-check and -s danger-full-access must be placed at command END
+codex -C [directory] --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: [clear goal]
+TASK: [specific task]
+MODE: write
 CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
 EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
 RULES: [template reference and constraints]
 " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 ```
 
-### Template Structure
-- [ ] **PURPOSE** - Clear goal and intent
-- [ ] **TASK** - Specific execution task
-- [ ] **MODE** - Execution mode and permission level
-- [ ] **CONTEXT** - File references and memory context from previous sessions
-- [ ] **EXPECTED** - Clear expected results
-- [ ] **RULES** - Template reference and constraints
-
-### MODE Field Definition
-
-The MODE field controls execution behavior and file permissions:
-
-**For Gemini** (全权限，可读写):
-- `analysis` (default) - 分析 + 可生成文档
-- `write` - 创建/修改文件（自动启用 --approval-mode yolo）
-
-**For Qwen** (仅分析):
-- `analysis` (default) - 仅架构分析，不生成代码
-
-**For Codex**:
-- `auto` (default) - 自主开发，全文件操作
-- `write` - 测试生成和文件修改
-
-### Directory Context
+### Directory Context Configuration
 Tools execute in current working directory:
 - **Gemini**: `cd path/to/project && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "prompt"`
 - **Qwen**: `cd path/to/project && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "prompt"`
@@ -103,7 +204,7 @@ Tools execute in current working directory:
 - **Path types**: Supports both relative (`../project`) and absolute (`/full/path`) paths
 - **Token analysis**: For gemini-wrapper and qwen-wrapper, token counting happens in current directory
 
-### Rules Field Format
+### RULES Field Format
 ```bash
 RULES: $(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].txt") | [constraints]
 ```
@@ -114,7 +215,44 @@ RULES: $(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].tx
 - No template: `Focus on security patterns, include dependency analysis`
 - File patterns: `@{src/**/*.ts,CLAUDE.md} - Stay within scope`
 
-## 📊 Tool Selection Matrix
+### File Pattern Reference
+- All files: `@{**/*}`
+- Source files: `@{src/**/*}`
+- TypeScript: `@{*.ts,*.tsx}`
+- With docs: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
+- Tests: `@{src/**/*.test.*}`
+
+**Complex Pattern Discovery**:
+For complex file pattern requirements, use semantic discovery tools BEFORE CLI execution:
+- **rg (ripgrep)**: Content-based file discovery with regex patterns
+- **Code Index MCP**: Semantic file search based on task requirements
+- **Workflow**: Discover → Extract precise paths → Build CONTEXT field
+
+**Example**:
+```bash
+# Step 1: Discover files semantically
+rg "export.*Component" --files-with-matches --type ts  # Find component files
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="interface.*Props", file_pattern="*.tsx")  # Find interface files
+
+# Step 2: Build precise CONTEXT from discovery results
+CONTEXT: @{src/components/Auth.tsx,src/types/auth.d.ts,src/hooks/useAuth.ts}
+
+# Step 3: Execute CLI with precise file references
+cd src && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze authentication components
+TASK: Review auth component patterns and props interfaces
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{components/Auth.tsx,types/auth.d.ts,hooks/useAuth.ts}
+EXPECTED: Pattern analysis and improvement suggestions
+RULES: Focus on type safety and component composition
+"
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Tool Selection Guide
+
+### Selection Matrix
 
 | Task Type | Tool | Use Case | Template |
 |-----------|------|----------|-----------|
@@ -127,11 +265,11 @@ RULES: $(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].tx
 | **Security** | Codex | Vulnerability assessment, fixes | `analysis/security.txt` |
 | **Refactoring** | Multiple | Gemini for analysis, Qwen/Codex for execution | `development/refactor.txt` |
 
-## 📁 Template System
+### Template System
 
 **Base Structure**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/`
 
-### Available Templates
+#### Available Templates
 ```
 prompts/
 ├── analysis/
@@ -157,6 +295,8 @@ tech-stacks/
 └── react-dev.md         - React architecture
 ```
 
+---
+
 ## 🚀 Usage Patterns
 
 ### Workflow Integration (REQUIRED)
@@ -168,8 +308,9 @@ When planning any coding task, **ALWAYS** integrate CLI tools:
 4. **Quality Phase**: Use Codex for testing and validation
 
 ### Common Scenarios
+
+#### Code Analysis
 ```bash
-# Gemini - Code Analysis
 ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
 PURPOSE: Understand codebase architecture
 TASK: Analyze project structure and identify patterns
@@ -178,8 +319,10 @@ CONTEXT: @{src/**/*.ts,CLAUDE.md} Previous analysis of auth system
 EXPECTED: Architecture overview and integration points
 RULES: $(cat '~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt') | Focus on integration points
 "
+```
 
-# Gemini - Generate Documentation
+#### Documentation Generation
+```bash
 ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
 PURPOSE: Generate API documentation
 TASK: Create comprehensive API reference from code
@@ -188,8 +331,10 @@ CONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*}
 EXPECTED: API.md with all endpoints documented
 RULES: Follow project documentation standards
 "
+```
 
-# Qwen - Architecture Analysis
+#### Architecture Analysis
+```bash
 cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
 PURPOSE: Analyze authentication system architecture
 TASK: Review JWT-based auth system design
@@ -198,8 +343,11 @@ CONTEXT: @{src/auth/**/*} Existing patterns and requirements
 EXPECTED: Architecture analysis report with recommendations
 RULES: $(cat '~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt') | Focus on security
 "
+```
 
-# Codex - Feature Development
+#### Feature Development (Multi-task with Resume)
+```bash
+# First task - establish session
 codex -C path/to/project --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: Implement user authentication
 TASK: Create JWT-based authentication system
@@ -209,66 +357,46 @@ EXPECTED: Complete auth module with tests
 RULES: $(cat '~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt') | Follow security best practices
 " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 
-# Codex - Test Generation
-codex -C src/auth --full-auto exec "
+# Continue in same session - Add JWT validation
+codex --full-auto exec "
+PURPOSE: Enhance authentication security
+TASK: Add JWT token validation and refresh logic
+MODE: auto
+CONTEXT: Previous auth implementation from current session
+EXPECTED: JWT validation middleware and token refresh endpoints
+RULES: Follow JWT best practices, maintain session context
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+# Continue in same session - Add tests
+codex --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: Increase test coverage
 TASK: Generate comprehensive tests for auth module
 MODE: write
-CONTEXT: @{**/*.ts} Exclude existing tests
+CONTEXT: Auth implementation from current session
 EXPECTED: Complete test suite with 80%+ coverage
 RULES: Use Jest, follow existing patterns
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
 ```
 
-## 📋 Planning Checklist
+#### Interactive Session Resume
+```bash
+# Resume previous session with picker
+codex resume
 
-For every development task:
-- [ ] **Purpose defined** - Clear goal and intent
-- [ ] **Mode selected** - Execution mode and permission level determined
-- [ ] **Context gathered** - File references and session memory documented
-- [ ] **Gemini analysis** completed for understanding
-- [ ] **Template selected** - Appropriate template chosen
-- [ ] **Constraints specified** - File patterns, scope, requirements
-- [ ] **Implementation approach** - Tool selection and workflow
-- [ ] **Quality measures** - Testing and validation plan
-- [ ] **Tool configuration** - Review `.gemini/CLAUDE.md` or `.codex/Agent.md` if needed
+# Or resume most recent session directly
+codex resume --last
+```
 
-## 🎯 Key Features
-
-### Gemini (全权限)
-- **Command**: `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper`
-- **Strengths**: Large context window, pattern recognition
-- **Best For**: Analysis, documentation generation, code exploration
-- **Permissions**: 可读写，MODE=write 时自动启用 --approval-mode yolo
-- **Default MODE**: `analysis`
-
-### Qwen (仅分析)
-- **Command**: `~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper`
-- **Strengths**: Architecture analysis, pattern recognition
-- **Best For**: System design analysis, architectural review
-- **Permissions**: 仅分析，不生成代码
-- **Default MODE**: `analysis`
-
-### Codex
-- **Command**: `codex --full-auto exec`
-- **Strengths**: Autonomous development, mathematical reasoning
-- **Best For**: Implementation, testing, automation
-- **Required**: `-s danger-full-access` and `--skip-git-repo-check` for development
-- **Default MODE**: `auto`
-
-### File Patterns
-- All files: `@{**/*}`
-- Source files: `@{src/**/*}`
-- TypeScript: `@{*.ts,*.tsx}`
-- With docs: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-- Tests: `@{src/**/*.test.*}`
+---
 
 ## 🔧 Best Practices
 
+### General Guidelines
 - **Start with templates** - Use predefined templates for consistency
 - **Be specific** - Clear PURPOSE, TASK, and EXPECTED fields
 - **Include constraints** - File patterns, scope, requirements in RULES
-- **Test patterns first** - Validate file patterns with `ls`
+- **Discover patterns first** - Use rg/MCP for complex file discovery before CLI execution
+- **Build precise CONTEXT** - Convert discovery results to explicit file references
 - **Document context** - Always reference CLAUDE.md for context
 
 ### Context Optimization Strategy
@@ -310,4 +438,42 @@ CONTEXT: @{**/*.ts}
 EXPECTED: Code improvements and fixes
 RULES: Maintain backward compatibility
 " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
+```
+
+### Planning Checklist
+
+For every development task:
+- [ ] **Purpose defined** - Clear goal and intent
+- [ ] **Mode selected** - Execution mode and permission level determined
+- [ ] **Context gathered** - File references and session memory documented
+- [ ] **Gemini analysis** completed for understanding
+- [ ] **Template selected** - Appropriate template chosen
+- [ ] **Constraints specified** - File patterns, scope, requirements
+- [ ] **Implementation approach** - Tool selection and workflow
+- [ ] **Quality measures** - Testing and validation plan
+- [ ] **Tool configuration** - Review `.gemini/CLAUDE.md` or `.codex/Agent.md` if needed
+
+---
+
+## ⚙️ Execution Configuration
+
+### Core Execution Rules
+- **Dynamic Timeout (20-120min)**: Allocate execution time based on task complexity
+  - Simple tasks (analysis, search): 20-40min (1200000-2400000ms)
+  - Medium tasks (refactoring, documentation): 40-60min (2400000-3600000ms)
+  - Complex tasks (implementation, migration): 60-120min (3600000-7200000ms)
+- **Codex Multiplier**: Codex commands use 1.5x of allocated time
+- **Apply to All Tools**: All bash() wrapped commands including Gemini, Qwen wrapper and Codex executions
+- **Command Examples**: `bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "prompt")`, `bash(codex -C directory --full-auto exec "task")`
+- **Auto-detect**: Analyze PURPOSE and TASK fields to determine appropriate timeout
+
+### Permission Framework
+- **⚠️ WRITE PROTECTION**: Local codebase write/modify requires EXPLICIT user confirmation
+  - **Analysis Mode (default)**: Read-only, safe for auto-execution
+  - **Write Mode**: Requires user explicitly states MODE=write or MODE=auto in prompt
+  - **Exception**: User provides clear instructions like "modify", "create", "implement"
+- **Gemini/Qwen Write Access**: Use `--approval-mode yolo` ONLY when MODE=write explicitly specified
+  - **Parameter Position**: Place AFTER the wrapper command: `gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "..."`
+- **Codex Write Access**: Use `-s danger-full-access` and `--skip-git-repo-check` ONLY when MODE=auto explicitly specified
+  - **Parameter Position**: Place AFTER the prompt string at command END: `codex ... exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+- **Default Behavior**: All tools default to analysis/read-only mode without explicit write permission

.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md

@@ -266,28 +266,73 @@ All workflows use the same file structure definition regardless of complexity. *
 
 #### Complete Structure Reference
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/
-├── workflow-session.json        # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
-├── [.brainstorming/]           # Optional brainstorming phase (created when needed)
-├── [.chat/]                    # CLI interaction sessions (created when analysis is run)
-│   ├── chat-*.md              # Saved chat sessions
-│   └── analysis-*.md          # Analysis results
-├── [.process/]                 # Planning analysis results (created by /workflow:plan)
-│   └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md    # Analysis results and planning artifacts
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md                # Planning document (REQUIRED)
-├── TODO_LIST.md                # Progress tracking (REQUIRED)
-├── [.summaries/]               # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
-│   ├── IMPL-*-summary.md      # Main task summaries
-│   └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md    # Subtask summaries
-└── .task/                      # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
-    ├── IMPL-*.json             # Main task definitions
-    └── IMPL-*.*.json           # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
+.workflow/
+├── [.scratchpad/]              # Non-session-specific outputs (created when needed)
+│   ├── analyze-*-[timestamp].md        # One-off analysis results
+│   ├── chat-*-[timestamp].md           # Standalone chat sessions
+│   ├── plan-*-[timestamp].md           # Ad-hoc planning notes
+│   ├── bug-index-*-[timestamp].md      # Quick bug analyses
+│   ├── code-analysis-*-[timestamp].md  # Standalone code analysis
+│   ├── execute-*-[timestamp].md        # Ad-hoc implementation logs
+│   └── codex-execute-*-[timestamp].md  # Multi-stage execution logs
+│
+└── WFS-[topic-slug]/
+    ├── workflow-session.json        # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
+    ├── [.brainstorming/]           # Optional brainstorming phase (created when needed)
+    ├── [.chat/]                    # CLI interaction sessions (created when analysis is run)
+    │   ├── chat-*.md              # Saved chat sessions
+    │   └── analysis-*.md          # Analysis results
+    ├── [.process/]                 # Planning analysis results (created by /workflow:plan)
+    │   └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md    # Analysis results and planning artifacts
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md                # Planning document (REQUIRED)
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md                # Progress tracking (REQUIRED)
+    ├── [.summaries/]               # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
+    │   ├── IMPL-*-summary.md      # Main task summaries
+    │   └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md    # Subtask summaries
+    └── .task/                      # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
+        ├── IMPL-*.json             # Main task definitions
+        └── IMPL-*.*.json           # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
 ```
 
 #### Creation Strategy
 - **Initial Setup**: Create only `workflow-session.json`, `IMPL_PLAN.md`, `TODO_LIST.md`, and `.task/` directory
 - **On-Demand Creation**: Other directories created when first needed
 - **Dynamic Files**: Subtask JSON files created during task decomposition
+- **Scratchpad Usage**: `.scratchpad/` created when CLI commands run without active session
+
+#### Scratchpad Directory (.scratchpad/)
+**Purpose**: Centralized location for non-session-specific CLI outputs
+
+**When to Use**:
+1. **No Active Session**: CLI analysis/chat commands run without an active workflow session
+2. **Unrelated Analysis**: Quick analysis not related to current active session
+3. **Exploratory Work**: Ad-hoc investigation before creating formal workflow
+4. **One-Off Queries**: Standalone questions or debugging without workflow context
+
+**Output Routing Logic**:
+- **IF** active session exists AND command is session-relevant:
+  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/[command]-[timestamp].md`
+- **ELSE** (no session OR one-off analysis):
+  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/[command]-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**File Naming Pattern**: `[command-type]-[brief-description]-[timestamp].md`
+
+**Examples**:
+
+*Analysis Commands (read-only):*
+- `/cli:analyze "security"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143022.md`
+- `/cli:chat "build process"` (unrelated to active session) → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
+- `/cli:mode:plan "feature idea"` (exploratory) → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143110.md`
+- `/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace auth flow"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-auth-flow-20250105-143130.md`
+
+*Implementation Commands (⚠️ modifies code):*
+- `/cli:execute "implement JWT auth"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143200.md`
+- `/cli:codex-execute "refactor API layer"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/codex-execute-api-refactor-20250105-143230.md`
+
+**Maintenance**:
+- Periodically review and clean up old scratchpad files
+- Promote useful analyses to formal workflow sessions if needed
+- No automatic cleanup - manual management recommended
 
 ### File Naming Conventions
 

.codex/AGENTS.md

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
 
 ## Prompt Structure
 
+### Single-Task Format
+
 **Receive prompts in this format**:
 
 ```
@@ -17,11 +19,61 @@ EXPECTED: [deliverables]
 RULES: [constraints and templates]
 ```
 
+### Multi-Task Format (Subtask Execution)
+
+**First subtask** (creates new session):
+```
+PURPOSE: [overall goal]
+TASK: [subtask 1 description]
+MODE: auto
+CONTEXT: [file patterns]
+EXPECTED: [subtask deliverables]
+RULES: [constraints]
+Subtask 1 of N: [subtask title]
+```
+
+**Subsequent subtasks** (continues via `resume --last`):
+```
+CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK:
+Subtask N of M: [subtask title]
+
+PURPOSE: [continuation goal]
+TASK: [subtask N description]
+CONTEXT: Previous work completed, now focus on [new files]
+EXPECTED: [subtask deliverables]
+RULES: Build on previous subtask, maintain consistency
+```
+
 ## Execution Requirements
 
+### System Optimization
+
+**Hard Requirement**: Call binaries directly in `functions.shell`, always set `workdir`, and avoid shell wrappers such as `bash -lc`, `sh -lc`, `zsh -lc`, `cmd /c`, `pwsh.exe -NoLogo -NoProfile -Command`, and `powershell.exe -NoLogo -NoProfile -Command`.
+
+**Text Editing Priority**: Use the `apply_patch` tool for all routine text edits; fall back to `sed` for single-line substitutions only if `apply_patch` is unavailable, and avoid `python` editing scripts unless both options fail.
+
+**`apply_patch` Usage**: Invoke `apply_patch` with the patch payload as the second element in the command array (no shell-style flags). Provide `workdir` and, when helpful, a short `justification` alongside the command.
+
+**Example invocation**:
+```json
+{
+  "command": ["apply_patch", "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: path/to/file\n@@\n- old\n+ new\n*** End Patch\n"],
+  "workdir": "<workdir>",
+  "justification": "Brief reason for the change"
+}
+```
+
+**Windows UTF-8 Encoding**: Before executing commands on Windows systems, ensure proper UTF-8 encoding by running:
+```powershell
+[Console]::InputEncoding  = [Text.UTF8Encoding]::new($false)
+[Console]::OutputEncoding = [Text.UTF8Encoding]::new($false)
+chcp 65001 > $null
+```
+
 ### ALWAYS
 
-- **Parse all six fields** - Understand PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES
+- **Parse all fields** - Understand PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES
+- **Detect subtask format** - Check for "Subtask N of M" or "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK"
 - **Follow MODE strictly** - Respect execution boundaries
 - **Study CONTEXT files** - Find 3+ similar patterns before implementing
 - **Apply RULES** - Follow templates and constraints exactly
@@ -29,6 +81,10 @@ RULES: [constraints and templates]
 - **Commit incrementally** - Small, working commits
 - **Match project style** - Follow existing patterns exactly
 - **Validate EXPECTED** - Ensure all deliverables are met
+- **Report context** (subtasks) - Summarize key info for next subtask
+- **Use direct binary calls** - Avoid shell wrappers for efficiency
+- **Prefer apply_patch** - Use for text edits over Python scripts
+- **Configure Windows encoding** - Set UTF-8 for Chinese character support
 
 ### NEVER
 
@@ -49,7 +105,7 @@ RULES: [constraints and templates]
 - Run tests and builds
 - Commit code incrementally
 
-**Execute**:
+**Execute (Single Task)**:
 1. Parse PURPOSE and TASK
 2. Analyze CONTEXT files - find 3+ similar patterns
 3. Plan implementation approach
@@ -60,7 +116,17 @@ RULES: [constraints and templates]
 8. Validate all EXPECTED deliverables
 9. Report results
 
-**Use For**: Feature implementation, bug fixes, refactoring
+**Execute (Multi-Task/Subtask)**:
+1. **First subtask**: Follow single-task flow above
+2. **Subsequent subtasks** (via `resume --last`):
+   - Recall context from previous subtask(s)
+   - Build on previous work (don't repeat)
+   - Maintain consistency with previous decisions
+   - Focus on current subtask scope only
+   - Test integration with previous subtasks
+   - Report subtask completion status
+
+**Use For**: Feature implementation, bug fixes, refactoring, multi-step tasks
 
 ### MODE: write
 
@@ -119,7 +185,7 @@ RULES: [constraints and templates]
 
 ## Progress Reporting
 
-### During Execution
+### During Execution (Single Task)
 
 ```
 [1/5] Analyzing existing code patterns...
@@ -129,7 +195,17 @@ RULES: [constraints and templates]
 [5/5] Running validation...
 ```
 
-### On Success
+### During Execution (Subtask)
+
+```
+[Subtask N/M: Subtask Title]
+[1/4] Recalling context from previous subtasks...
+[2/4] Implementing current subtask...
+[3/4] Testing integration with previous work...
+[4/4] Validating subtask completion...
+```
+
+### On Success (Single Task)
 
 ```
 ✅ Task completed
@@ -146,6 +222,26 @@ Validation:
 Next Steps: [recommendations]
 ```
 
+### On Success (Subtask)
+
+```
+✅ Subtask N/M completed
+
+Changes:
+- Created: [files]
+- Modified: [files]
+
+Integration:
+✅ Compatible with previous subtasks
+✅ Tests: [count] passing
+✅ Build: Success
+
+Context for next subtask:
+- [Key decisions made]
+- [Files created/modified]
+- [Patterns established]
+```
+
 ### On Partial Completion
 
 ```
@@ -178,6 +274,60 @@ Recommendation: [next steps]
 - Graceful degradation
 - Don't expose sensitive info
 
+## Multi-Step Task Execution
+
+### Context Continuity via Resume
+
+When executing subtasks via `codex exec "..." resume --last`:
+
+**Advantages**:
+- Session memory preserves previous decisions
+- Maintains implementation style consistency
+- Avoids redundant context re-injection
+- Enables incremental testing and validation
+
+**Best Practices**:
+1. **First subtask**: Establish patterns and architecture
+2. **Subsequent subtasks**: Build on established patterns
+3. **Test integration**: After each subtask, verify compatibility
+4. **Report context**: Summarize key decisions for next subtask
+5. **Maintain scope**: Focus only on current subtask goals
+
+### Subtask Coordination
+
+**DO**:
+- Remember decisions from previous subtasks
+- Reuse patterns established earlier
+- Test integration with previous work
+- Report what's ready for next subtask
+
+**DON'T**:
+- Re-implement what previous subtasks completed
+- Change patterns established earlier (unless explicitly requested)
+- Skip testing integration points
+- Assume next subtask's requirements
+
+### Example Flow
+
+```
+Subtask 1: Create data models
+→ Establishes: Schema patterns, validation approach
+→ Delivers: Models with tests
+→ Context for next: Model structure, validation rules
+
+Subtask 2: Implement API endpoints (resume --last)
+→ Recalls: Model structure from subtask 1
+→ Builds on: Uses established models
+→ Delivers: API with integration tests
+→ Context for next: API patterns, error handling
+
+Subtask 3: Add authentication (resume --last)
+→ Recalls: API patterns from subtask 2
+→ Integrates: Auth middleware into existing endpoints
+→ Delivers: Secured API
+→ Final validation: Full integration test
+```
+
 ## Philosophy
 
 - **Incremental progress over big bangs** - Small, testable changes
@@ -186,6 +336,7 @@ Recommendation: [next steps]
 - **Clear intent over clever code** - Boring, obvious solutions
 - **Simple over complex** - Avoid over-engineering
 - **Follow existing style** - Match project patterns exactly
+- **Context continuity** - Leverage resume for multi-step consistency
 
 ## Execution Checklist
 
@@ -211,5 +362,10 @@ Recommendation: [next steps]
 
 ---
 
-**Version**: 2.0.0
-**Last Updated**: 2025-10-02
+**Version**: 2.2.0
+**Last Updated**: 2025-10-04
+**Changes**:
+- Added system optimization requirements for direct binary calls
+- Added apply_patch tool priority for text editing
+- Added Windows UTF-8 encoding configuration for Chinese character support
+- Previous: Multi-step task execution support with resume mechanism

.gitignore

@@ -17,4 +17,6 @@ yarn-error.log*
 Thumbs.db
 
 .env
-settings.local.json
+settings.local.json
+.workflow
+version.json

.qwen/QWEN.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+# QWEN Execution Protocol
+
+## Overview
+
+**Role**: QWEN - code analysis and documentation generation
+
+## Prompt Structure
+
+**Receive prompts in this format**:
+
+```
+PURPOSE: [goal statement]
+TASK: [specific task]
+MODE: [analysis|write]
+CONTEXT: [file patterns]
+EXPECTED: [deliverables]
+RULES: [constraints and templates]
+```
+
+## Execution Requirements
+
+### ALWAYS
+
+- **Parse all six fields** - Understand PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES
+- **Follow MODE strictly** - Respect permission boundaries
+- **Analyze CONTEXT files** - Read all matching patterns thoroughly
+- **Apply RULES** - Follow templates and constraints exactly
+- **Provide evidence** - Quote code with file:line references
+- **Match EXPECTED** - Deliver exactly what's requested
+
+### NEVER
+
+- **Assume behavior** - Verify with actual code
+- **Ignore CONTEXT** - Stay within specified file patterns
+- **Skip RULES** - Templates are mandatory when provided
+- **Make unsubstantiated claims** - Always back with code references
+- **Deviate from MODE** - Respect read/write boundaries
+
+## MODE Behavior
+
+### MODE: analysis (default)
+
+**Permissions**:
+- Read all CONTEXT files
+- Create/modify documentation files
+
+**Execute**:
+1. Read and analyze CONTEXT files
+2. Identify patterns and issues
+3. Generate insights and recommendations
+4. Create documentation if needed
+5. Output structured analysis
+
+**Constraint**: Do NOT modify source code files
+
+### MODE: write
+
+**Permissions**:
+- Full file operations
+- Create/modify any files
+
+**Execute**:
+1. Read CONTEXT files
+2. Perform requested file operations
+3. Create/modify files as specified
+4. Validate changes
+5. Report file changes
+
+## Output Format
+
+### Standard Analysis Structure
+
+```markdown
+# Analysis: [TASK Title]
+
+## Summary
+[2-3 sentence overview]
+
+## Key Findings
+1. [Finding] - path/to/file:123
+2. [Finding] - path/to/file:456
+
+## Detailed Analysis
+[Evidence-based analysis with code quotes]
+
+## Recommendations
+1. [Actionable recommendation]
+2. [Actionable recommendation]
+```
+
+### Code References
+
+Always use format: `path/to/file:line_number`
+
+Example: "Authentication logic at `src/auth/jwt.ts:45` uses deprecated algorithm"
+
+## RULES Processing
+
+- **Parse the RULES field** to identify template content and additional constraints
+- **Recognize `|` as separator** between template and additional constraints
+- **ALWAYS apply all template guidelines** provided in the prompt
+- **ALWAYS apply all additional constraints** specified after `|`
+- **Treat all rules as mandatory** - both template and constraints must be followed
+- **Failure to follow any rule** constitutes task failure
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**File Not Found**:
+- Report missing files
+- Continue with available files
+- Note in output
+
+**Invalid CONTEXT Pattern**:
+- Report invalid pattern
+- Request correction
+- Do not guess
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### Thoroughness
+- Analyze ALL files in CONTEXT
+- Check cross-file patterns
+- Identify edge cases
+- Quantify when possible
+
+### Evidence-Based
+- Quote relevant code
+- Provide file:line references
+- Link related patterns
+
+### Actionable
+- Clear recommendations
+- Prioritized by impact
+- Specific, not vague
+
+## Philosophy
+
+- **Incremental over big bangs** - Suggest small, testable changes
+- **Learn from existing code** - Reference project patterns
+- **Pragmatic over dogmatic** - Adapt to project reality
+- **Clear over clever** - Prefer obvious solutions
+- **Simple over complex** - Avoid over-engineering
+

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -5,6 +5,430 @@ All notable changes to Claude Code Workflow (CCW) will be documented in this fil
 The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
 and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
 
+## [3.5.0] - 2025-10-06
+
+### 🎨 UI Design Workflow with Triple Vision Analysis
+
+This release introduces a comprehensive UI design workflow system with triple vision analysis capabilities, interactive user checkpoints, and zero agent overhead for improved performance.
+
+#### Added
+
+**New UI Design Workflow System**:
+- **`/workflow:design:auto`**: Semi-autonomous UI design workflow orchestrator
+  - Interactive checkpoints for user style selection and prototype confirmation
+  - Optional batch task generation with `--batch-plan` flag
+  - Pause-and-continue pattern at critical decision points
+  - Automatic progression between phases after user input
+  - Support for multiple UI variants per page (`--variants` parameter)
+
+**Triple Vision Analysis Architecture**:
+- **Phase 1: Claude Code Vision Analysis**: Quick initial visual analysis using native Read tool
+- **Phase 2: Gemini Vision Analysis**: Deep semantic understanding of design intent
+- **Phase 3: Codex Vision Analysis**: Structured pattern recognition with `-i` parameter
+- **Phase 4: Consensus Synthesis**: Weighted combination by main Claude agent
+- **Synthesis Strategy**:
+  - Color system: Consensus with Codex precision preference
+  - Typography: Gemini semantic + Codex measurements
+  - Spacing: Cross-validation across all three sources
+  - Design philosophy: Weighted with Gemini highest priority
+  - Conflict resolution: Majority vote or synthesis-specification.md context
+
+**Individual Design Commands**:
+- **`/workflow:design:style-extract`**: Extract design styles from reference images
+  - Triple vision analysis (Claude Code + Gemini + Codex)
+  - Generates `semantic_style_analysis.json`, `design-tokens.json`, `style-cards.json`
+  - Outputs multiple style variant cards for user selection
+  - Direct bash execution (no agent wrappers)
+
+- **`/workflow:design:style-consolidate`**: Consolidate selected style variants
+  - Validates and merges design tokens
+  - Generates finalized `design-tokens.json`, `style-guide.md`, `tailwind.config.js`
+  - WCAG AA compliance validation
+  - Token coverage ≥90% requirement
+
+- **`/workflow:design:ui-generate`**: Generate production-ready UI prototypes
+  - Token-driven HTML/CSS generation with Codex
+  - Support for `--style-overrides` parameter for runtime customization
+  - Generates `{page}-variant-{n}.html`, `{page}-variant-{n}.css` per page
+  - Semantic HTML5 with ARIA attributes
+  - Responsive design with token-based breakpoints
+
+- **`/workflow:design:design-update`**: Integrate design system into brainstorming
+  - Updates `synthesis-specification.md` with UI/UX guidelines section
+  - Creates/updates `ui-designer/style-guide.md`
+  - Makes design tokens available for task generation phase
+
+**Interactive Checkpoint System**:
+- **Checkpoint 1 (After style-extract)**: User selects preferred style variants
+  - Command: `/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-xxx --variants "variant-1,variant-3"`
+  - Workflow pauses until user runs consolidation command
+
+- **Checkpoint 2 (After ui-generate)**: User confirms selected prototypes
+  - Command: `/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-xxx --selected-prototypes "page-variant-1,page-variant-2"`
+  - Workflow pauses until user runs design-update command
+
+**Design System Features**:
+- **OKLCH Color Format**: Perceptually uniform color space for design tokens
+- **W3C Design Tokens Compatibility**: Standard-compliant token format
+- **Style Override Mechanism**: Runtime token merging using jq
+- **Batch Task Generation**: Automatic `/workflow:plan` invocation for each page
+- **Accessibility Validation**: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance checks
+
+#### Changed
+
+**Agent Architecture Simplification**:
+- **Removed agent wrappers** from `style-extract` and `ui-generate` commands
+  - Previously used `Task(conceptual-planning-agent)` for simple bash execution
+  - Now executes `gemini-wrapper` and `codex` commands directly via Bash tool
+  - Reduced execution overhead and complexity
+  - Preserved all functionality while improving performance
+
+**Command Execution Pattern**:
+- **Direct Bash Execution**: All CLI tools now use direct bash commands
+  - Gemini Vision: `bash(gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "...")`
+  - Codex Vision: `bash(codex -i {images} --full-auto exec "..." -s danger-full-access)`
+  - Codex Token Generation: `bash(codex --full-auto exec "..." -s danger-full-access)`
+  - No intermediate agent layers
+
+**Workflow Integration**:
+- Design phase now optional but recommended for UI-heavy projects
+- Seamless integration with existing brainstorming → planning → execution flow
+- Design artifacts automatically discovered by `task-generate` if present
+- UI tasks automatically include `load_design_tokens` in flow_control
+
+**Updated Documentation**:
+- **README.md**: Added UI Design Workflow section in Getting Started
+- **README_CN.md**: Chinese documentation updated with design workflow
+- **Command Reference**: Added 5 new `/workflow:design:*` commands
+- **Phase Renumbering**: Shifted phases to accommodate new Phase 2 (UI Design)
+
+#### Benefits
+
+**User Experience**:
+- 🎨 **Visual Validation**: Users confirm design before implementation starts
+- ⏸️ **Interactive Control**: Critical design decisions require explicit user approval
+- 👁️ **Comprehensive Analysis**: Three AI vision sources provide robust style extraction
+- 🎯 **Zero Waiting**: Direct bash execution eliminates agent overhead
+- 📦 **Automation Ready**: Optional batch task generation accelerates workflow
+
+**Code Quality**:
+- 🔒 **Token Enforcement**: 100% CSS values use custom properties (verified)
+- ♿ **Accessibility**: WCAG AA validated at design phase
+- 🎨 **Consistency**: Single source of truth for visual design (design-tokens.json)
+- 🧪 **Production Ready**: Semantic HTML5, responsive, accessible prototypes
+
+**Development Workflow**:
+- 🔄 **Seamless Integration**: Optional design phase fits between brainstorming and planning
+- 🚀 **Backward Compatible**: Existing workflows unaffected if design phase skipped
+- 📊 **Better Planning**: Design system context improves task generation quality
+- 🎯 **Focused Implementation**: Developers work from validated prototypes and tokens
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+**Triple Vision Analysis Flow**:
+```
+Reference Images
+  ↓
+Phase 2: Claude Code (Read tool) → claude_vision_analysis.json
+Phase 3: Gemini Vision (gemini-wrapper) → gemini_vision_analysis.json
+Phase 4: Codex Vision (codex -i) → codex_vision_analysis.json
+  ↓
+Phase 5: Main Claude Synthesis → semantic_style_analysis.json
+  ↓
+Phase 6: Codex Token Generation → design-tokens.json, style-cards.json
+```
+
+**Checkpoint Workflow Pattern**:
+```
+User: /workflow:design:auto --session WFS-xxx --images "refs/*.png" --pages "dashboard,auth"
+  ↓
+Phase 1: style-extract (automatic)
+  ↓ [CHECKPOINT 1: User selects style variants]
+User: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-xxx --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
+  ↓
+Phase 3: ui-generate (automatic after Phase 2)
+  ↓ [CHECKPOINT 2: User confirms prototypes]
+User: /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-xxx --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2"
+  ↓
+Phase 5: batch-plan (optional, automatic if --batch-plan flag)
+```
+
+**Output Structure**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/
+├── style-extraction/
+│   ├── claude_vision_analysis.json
+│   ├── gemini_vision_analysis.json
+│   ├── codex_vision_analysis.json
+│   ├── semantic_style_analysis.json (synthesis)
+│   ├── design-tokens.json (preliminary)
+│   └── style-cards.json (variants for selection)
+├── style-consolidation/
+│   ├── style-philosophy.md
+│   ├── design-tokens.json (final, validated)
+│   ├── style-guide.md
+│   ├── tailwind.config.js
+│   └── validation-report.json
+└── prototypes/
+    ├── {page}-variant-{n}.html (per page, per variant)
+    ├── {page}-variant-{n}.css (token-driven styles)
+    ├── {page}-variant-{n}-notes.md (implementation notes)
+    └── design-tokens.css (CSS custom properties)
+```
+
+**New Agent Documentation**:
+- **`ui-design-agent.md`**: Specialized agent for UI/UX design workflows
+  - Vision analysis, token generation, prototype creation capabilities
+  - Multi-modal vision provider strategy (Gemini primary, Codex fallback)
+  - Quality gates: WCAG AA, token coverage ≥90%, component mapping ≥95%
+  - Flow control specification for 3 design phases
+
+#### Use Cases
+
+**When to Use Design Workflow**:
+- User-facing applications with visual design requirements
+- Design system creation and maintenance
+- Brand-critical user interfaces
+- Projects requiring accessibility compliance
+- Multi-page applications with consistent styling
+
+**When to Skip Design Workflow**:
+- Backend APIs without UI components
+- CLI tools and command-line applications
+- Quick prototypes and MVPs
+- Projects with existing design systems
+
+---
+
+## [3.4.2] - 2025-10-05
+
+### 📚 CLI Documentation Refactoring
+
+This release focuses on eliminating redundant documentation by establishing a single source of truth (SSOT) pattern for CLI command references.
+
+#### Changed
+
+**CLI Command Documentation Refactoring**:
+- Refactored 7 CLI command documentation files to eliminate redundancy
+- Removed **681 total lines** of duplicate content across all files
+- Established implicit reference pattern to `intelligent-tools-strategy.md` (loaded in memory)
+- Preserved all unique command-specific content and capabilities
+
+**Specific File Reductions**:
+- `analyze.md`: 117→61 lines (48% reduction)
+- `chat.md`: 118→62 lines (47% reduction)
+- `execute.md`: 180→100 lines (44% reduction)
+- `codex-execute.md`: 481→473 lines (2% - preserved unique workflow content)
+- `mode/bug-index.md`: 144→75 lines (48% reduction)
+- `mode/code-analysis.md`: 188→76 lines (60% reduction)
+- `mode/plan.md`: 100→76 lines (24% reduction)
+
+**Removed Duplicate Sections**:
+- Universal Command Template (now only in `intelligent-tools-strategy.md`)
+- File Pattern Reference (centralized in strategy guide)
+- Complex Pattern Discovery (centralized in strategy guide)
+- MODE Field Definition (centralized in strategy guide)
+- Enhancement Integration details (referenced implicitly)
+- Session Persistence details (referenced implicitly)
+
+**Preserved Unique Content**:
+- Command-specific purpose and parameters
+- Unique execution flows and capabilities
+- Specialized features (YOLO permissions, task decomposition, resume patterns)
+- Command-specific examples and workflows
+- File pattern auto-detection logic for analyze command
+- Group-based execution workflow for codex-execute command
+
+#### Added
+
+**Documentation Enhancement** (prior to refactoring):
+- Enhanced file pattern examples and complex pattern discovery documentation
+- Added semantic discovery workflow integration examples
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+**Single Source of Truth Pattern**:
+All CLI commands now reference `intelligent-tools-strategy.md` for:
+- Universal command template structure
+- File pattern syntax and examples
+- Complex pattern discovery workflows
+- MODE field definitions and permissions
+- Tool-specific features and capabilities
+
+**Reference Pattern**:
+```markdown
+## Notes
+- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
+```
+
+This approach reduces maintenance overhead while ensuring documentation consistency across all CLI commands.
+
+## [3.4.1] - 2025-10-04
+
+### 🎯 Multi-Tool Support for Documentation Updates
+
+This release adds flexible tool selection for CLAUDE.md documentation generation, allowing users to choose between Gemini, Qwen, or Codex based on their analysis needs.
+
+#### Added
+
+**Multi-Tool Support**:
+- **`/update-memory-full --tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`**: Choose tool for full project documentation update
+- **`/update-memory-related --tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`**: Choose tool for context-aware documentation update
+- **Default**: Gemini (documentation generation, pattern recognition)
+- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
+- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
+
+**Script Enhancement** (`update_module_claude.sh`):
+- Added third parameter for tool selection: `<module_path> [update_type] [tool]`
+- Support for three tools with consistent parameter syntax:
+  - `gemini --all-files --yolo -p` (default)
+  - `qwen --all-files --yolo -p` (direct command, no wrapper)
+  - `codex --full-auto exec` (with danger-full-access)
+- Automatic tool routing via case statement
+- Improved logging with tool information display
+
+#### Changed
+
+**Command Documentation**:
+- Updated `/update-memory-full.md` with tool selection usage and examples
+- Updated `/update-memory-related.md` with tool selection usage and examples
+- Added tool selection strategy and rationale documentation
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+**Tool Execution Patterns**:
+```bash
+# Gemini (default)
+gemini --all-files --yolo -p "$prompt"
+
+# Qwen (architecture analysis)
+qwen --all-files --yolo -p "$prompt"
+
+# Codex (implementation validation)
+codex --full-auto exec "$prompt" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**Backward Compatibility**:
+- ✅ Existing commands without `--tool` parameter default to Gemini
+- ✅ All three tools support Layer 1-4 template system
+- ✅ No breaking changes to existing workflows
+
+## [3.3.0] - 2025-10-04
+
+### 🚀 CLI Tool Enhancements & Codex Multi-Step Execution
+
+This release streamlines CLI tool documentation and introduces automated multi-step task execution with Codex.
+
+#### Added
+
+**New Command: `/cli:codex-execute`**:
+- **Purpose**: Automated task decomposition and sequential execution with Codex
+- **Features**:
+  - Automatic task breakdown into 3-8 manageable subtasks
+  - Sequential execution using `codex exec "..." resume --last` mechanism
+  - TodoWrite progress tracking for each subtask
+  - Optional Git verification after each subtask (`--verify-git` flag)
+  - Supports both freeform descriptions and workflow task IDs
+  - Automatic detection and loading of task JSON files
+  - Context continuity across subtasks via resume mechanism
+  - Integration with workflow system (optional)
+
+**Codex Resume Mechanism**:
+- **First Subtask**: Creates new Codex session with `codex exec`
+- **Subsequent Subtasks**: Continues with `codex exec "..." resume --last`
+- **Benefits**:
+  - Session memory preserves previous decisions
+  - Maintains implementation style consistency
+  - Avoids redundant context re-injection
+  - Enables incremental testing and validation
+
+**Enhanced Codex Agent Configuration** (`.codex/AGENTS.md`):
+- Added multi-task prompt format (Single-Task & Multi-Task)
+- Enhanced MODE: auto with subtask execution flow
+- New "Multi-Step Task Execution" section with:
+  - Context continuity best practices
+  - Subtask coordination guidelines
+  - Example 3-subtask workflow demonstration
+- Updated progress reporting for subtasks
+- Version 2.1.0 with multi-step task execution support
+
+#### Changed
+
+**CLI Documentation Optimization**:
+- **Streamlined Documentation**: Reduced redundancy by referencing `intelligent-tools-strategy.md`
+- **Updated Commands**:
+  - `/cli:analyze` - Simplified from ~200 to ~78 lines
+  - `/cli:chat` - Simplified from ~161 to ~92 lines
+  - `/cli:execute` - Simplified from ~235 to ~111 lines
+- **Unified Command Templates**:
+  - Separated Gemini/Qwen (uses `-p` parameter) from Codex (uses `exec` command)
+  - Added Codex `-i` parameter documentation for image attachment
+  - Consistent template structure across all CLI commands
+
+**Intelligent Tools Strategy Updates**:
+- Enhanced Codex session management documentation
+- Added `codex exec "..." resume --last` syntax explanation
+- Documented multi-task execution pattern
+- Clarified image attachment workflow with resume
+
+**Command Template Improvements**:
+- **Gemini/Qwen**: `cd [dir] && ~/.claude/scripts/[tool]-wrapper -p "..."`
+- **Codex**: `codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+- **Codex with Resume**: `codex exec "..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+- **Image Support**: `codex -C [dir] -i image.png --full-auto exec "..."`
+
+#### Technical Details
+
+**Multi-Step Execution Flow**:
+```
+Input → Parse (Description/Task ID) → Decompose into Subtasks → TodoWrite Tracking →
+For Each Subtask:
+  1. Execute with Codex (first: exec, subsequent: exec resume --last)
+  2. [Optional] Git verification
+  3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
+→ Final Summary
+```
+
+**Subtask Decomposition Criteria**:
+- Each subtask: 5-15 minutes completable
+- Clear, testable outcomes
+- Explicit dependencies
+- Focused file scope (1-5 files per subtask)
+
+**Error Handling**:
+- Subtask failure: Pause for user intervention
+- Git verification failure: Request user decision
+- Codex session lost: Attempt retry with fresh session
+
+**Integration Features**:
+- Automatic task ID detection (e.g., `IMPL-001`, `TASK-123`)
+- JSON task loading from `.task/[ID].json`
+- Execution logging to `.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
+- Summary generation to `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`
+
+#### Benefits
+
+**Developer Experience**:
+- 🚀 Automated task breakdown reduces planning overhead
+- 📊 Clear progress tracking with TodoWrite integration
+- 🔄 Context continuity improves code consistency
+- ✅ Optional Git verification ensures code quality
+- 🎯 Focused subtask execution reduces complexity
+
+**Code Quality**:
+- 🧪 Incremental testing after each subtask
+- 🔍 Git verification catches unexpected changes
+- 📝 Comprehensive execution logs for audit trail
+- 🎨 Image attachment support for UI/design tasks
+
+**Documentation**:
+- 📚 Reduced documentation redundancy by ~60%
+- 🔗 Clear references to master documentation
+- ✨ Consistent command structure across all CLI tools
+- 📖 Better separation of concerns (strategy vs. command docs)
+
+---
+
 ## [3.2.3] - 2025-10-03
 
 ### ✨ Version Management System

CLAUDE.md

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ For all CLI tool usage, command syntax, and integration guidelines:
 - **Learning from existing code** - Study and plan before implementing
 - **Clear intent over clever code** - Be boring and obvious
 - **Follow existing code style** - Match import patterns, naming conventions, and formatting of existing codebase
+- **No unsolicited reports** - Task summaries can be performed internally, but NEVER generate additional reports, documentation files, or summary files without explicit user permission
 
 ### Simplicity Means
 
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ For all CLI tool usage, command syntax, and integration guidelines:
 
 **NEVER**:
 - Make assumptions - verify with existing code
+- Generate reports, summaries, or documentation files without explicit user request
 
 **ALWAYS**:
 - Plan complex tasks thoroughly before implementation

INSTALL.md

@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ cd Dmsflow
 .\Install-Claude.ps1 -Global
 
 # 4. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflows!
-# Use /workflow commands and DMS system for development
+# Use /workflow commands and memory system for development
 ```
 
 ## Verification
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ After installation, verify:
    - Check that global `.claude` directory is recognized
    - Verify workflow commands and DMS commands are available
    - Test `/workflow` commands for agent coordination
-   - Test `/dmsflow version` to check version information
+   - Test `/workflow version` to check version information
 
 ## Troubleshooting
 

INSTALL_CN.md

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ cd Dmsflow
 .\Install-Claude.ps1 -Global
 
 # 4. 开始使用 Claude Code Agent 工作流！
-# 使用 /workflow 命令和 DMS 系统进行开发
+# 使用 /workflow 命令和内存系统进行开发
 ```
 
 ## 验证
@@ -181,9 +181,9 @@ cd Dmsflow
 2. **测试 Claude Code：**
    - 在项目中打开 Claude Code
    - 检查全局 `.claude` 目录是否被识别
-   - 验证工作流命令和 DMS 命令是否可用
+   - 验证工作流命令和内存命令是否可用
    - 测试 `/workflow` 命令的 Agent 协调功能
-   - 测试 `/dmsflow version` 检查版本信息
+   - 测试 `/workflow version` 检查版本信息
 
 ## 故障排除
 

Install-Claude.ps1

@@ -63,7 +63,9 @@ param(
 
     [string]$SourceVersion = "",
 
-    [string]$SourceBranch = ""
+    [string]$SourceBranch = "",
+
+    [string]$SourceCommit = ""
 )
 
 # Set encoding for proper Unicode support
@@ -78,7 +80,10 @@ if ($PSVersionTable.PSVersion.Major -ge 6) {
 
 # Script metadata
 $ScriptName = "Claude Code Workflow System Installer"
-$Version = "2.1.0"
+$ScriptVersion = "2.2.0"  # Installer script version
+
+# Default version (will be overridden by -SourceVersion from install-remote.ps1)
+$DefaultVersion = "unknown"
 
 # Initialize backup behavior - backup is enabled by default unless NoBackup is specified
 if (-not $BackupAll -and -not $NoBackup) {
@@ -141,8 +146,15 @@ function Show-Banner {
 }
 
 function Show-Header {
+    param(
+        [string]$InstallVersion = $DefaultVersion
+    )
+
     Show-Banner
-    Write-ColorOutput "    $ScriptName v$Version" $ColorInfo
+    Write-ColorOutput "    $ScriptName v$ScriptVersion" $ColorInfo
+    if ($InstallVersion -ne "unknown") {
+        Write-ColorOutput "    Installing Claude Code Workflow v$InstallVersion" $ColorInfo
+    }
     Write-ColorOutput "    Unified workflow system with comprehensive coordination" $ColorInfo
     Write-ColorOutput "========================================================================" $ColorInfo
     if ($NoBackup) {
@@ -167,6 +179,7 @@ function Test-Prerequisites {
     $claudeMd = Join-Path $sourceDir "CLAUDE.md"
     $codexDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".codex"
     $geminiDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".gemini"
+    $qwenDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".qwen"
 
     if (-not (Test-Path $claudeDir)) {
         Write-ColorOutput "ERROR: .claude directory not found in $sourceDir" $ColorError
@@ -188,6 +201,11 @@ function Test-Prerequisites {
         return $false
     }
 
+    if (-not (Test-Path $qwenDir)) {
+        Write-ColorOutput "ERROR: .qwen directory not found in $sourceDir" $ColorError
+        return $false
+    }
+
     Write-ColorOutput "Prerequisites check passed" $ColorSuccess
     return $true
 }
@@ -632,24 +650,27 @@ function Create-VersionJson {
         [string]$InstallationMode
     )
 
-    # Determine version from source or default
-    $versionNumber = if ($SourceVersion) { $SourceVersion } else { $Version }
+    # Determine version from source parameter (passed from install-remote.ps1)
+    $versionNumber = if ($SourceVersion) { $SourceVersion } else { $DefaultVersion }
     $sourceBranch = if ($SourceBranch) { $SourceBranch } else { "unknown" }
+    $commitSha = if ($SourceCommit) { $SourceCommit } else { "unknown" }
 
     # Create version.json content
     $versionInfo = @{
         version = $versionNumber
+        commit_sha = $commitSha
         installation_mode = $InstallationMode
         installation_path = $TargetClaudeDir
         installation_date_utc = (Get-Date).ToUniversalTime().ToString("yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ssZ")
         source_branch = $sourceBranch
+        installer_version = $ScriptVersion
     }
 
     $versionJsonPath = Join-Path $TargetClaudeDir "version.json"
 
     try {
         $versionInfo | ConvertTo-Json | Out-File -FilePath $versionJsonPath -Encoding utf8 -Force
-        Write-ColorOutput "Created version.json: $versionNumber ($InstallationMode)" $ColorSuccess
+        Write-ColorOutput "Created version.json: $versionNumber ($commitSha) - $InstallationMode" $ColorSuccess
         return $true
     } catch {
         Write-ColorOutput "WARNING: Failed to create version.json: $($_.Exception.Message)" $ColorWarning
@@ -666,6 +687,7 @@ function Install-Global {
     $globalClaudeMd = Join-Path $globalClaudeDir "CLAUDE.md"
     $globalCodexDir = Join-Path $userProfile ".codex"
     $globalGeminiDir = Join-Path $userProfile ".gemini"
+    $globalQwenDir = Join-Path $userProfile ".qwen"
 
     Write-ColorOutput "Global installation path: $userProfile" $ColorInfo
 
@@ -675,11 +697,12 @@ function Install-Global {
     $sourceClaudeMd = Join-Path $sourceDir "CLAUDE.md"
     $sourceCodexDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".codex"
     $sourceGeminiDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".gemini"
+    $sourceQwenDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".qwen"
 
     # Create backup folder if needed (default behavior unless NoBackup is specified)
     $backupFolder = $null
     if (-not $NoBackup) {
-        if ((Test-Path $globalClaudeDir) -or (Test-Path $globalCodexDir) -or (Test-Path $globalGeminiDir)) {
+        if ((Test-Path $globalClaudeDir) -or (Test-Path $globalCodexDir) -or (Test-Path $globalGeminiDir) -or (Test-Path $globalQwenDir)) {
             $existingFiles = @()
             if (Test-Path $globalClaudeDir) {
                 $existingFiles += Get-ChildItem $globalClaudeDir -Recurse -File -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
@@ -690,6 +713,9 @@ function Install-Global {
             if (Test-Path $globalGeminiDir) {
                 $existingFiles += Get-ChildItem $globalGeminiDir -Recurse -File -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
             }
+            if (Test-Path $globalQwenDir) {
+                $existingFiles += Get-ChildItem $globalQwenDir -Recurse -File -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
+            }
             if (($existingFiles -and ($existingFiles | Measure-Object).Count -gt 0)) {
                 $backupFolder = Get-BackupDirectory -TargetDirectory $userProfile
                 Write-ColorOutput "Backup folder created: $backupFolder" $ColorInfo
@@ -717,6 +743,10 @@ function Install-Global {
     Write-ColorOutput "Merging .gemini directory contents..." $ColorInfo
     $geminiMerged = Merge-DirectoryContents -Source $sourceGeminiDir -Destination $globalGeminiDir -Description ".gemini directory contents" -BackupFolder $backupFolder
 
+    # Merge .qwen directory contents
+    Write-ColorOutput "Merging .qwen directory contents..." $ColorInfo
+    $qwenMerged = Merge-DirectoryContents -Source $sourceQwenDir -Destination $globalQwenDir -Description ".qwen directory contents" -BackupFolder $backupFolder
+
     # Create version.json in global .claude directory
     Write-ColorOutput "Creating version.json..." $ColorInfo
     Create-VersionJson -TargetClaudeDir $globalClaudeDir -InstallationMode "Global"
@@ -753,16 +783,18 @@ function Install-Path {
     $sourceClaudeMd = Join-Path $sourceDir "CLAUDE.md"
     $sourceCodexDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".codex"
     $sourceGeminiDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".gemini"
+    $sourceQwenDir = Join-Path $sourceDir ".qwen"
 
-    # Local paths - for agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini
+    # Local paths - for agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini, .qwen
     $localClaudeDir = Join-Path $TargetDirectory ".claude"
     $localCodexDir = Join-Path $TargetDirectory ".codex"
     $localGeminiDir = Join-Path $TargetDirectory ".gemini"
+    $localQwenDir = Join-Path $TargetDirectory ".qwen"
 
     # Create backup folder if needed
     $backupFolder = $null
     if (-not $NoBackup) {
-        if ((Test-Path $localClaudeDir) -or (Test-Path $localCodexDir) -or (Test-Path $localGeminiDir) -or (Test-Path $globalClaudeDir)) {
+        if ((Test-Path $localClaudeDir) -or (Test-Path $localCodexDir) -or (Test-Path $localGeminiDir) -or (Test-Path $localQwenDir) -or (Test-Path $globalClaudeDir)) {
             $backupFolder = Get-BackupDirectory -TargetDirectory $TargetDirectory
             Write-ColorOutput "Backup folder created: $backupFolder" $ColorInfo
         }
@@ -858,6 +890,10 @@ function Install-Path {
     Write-ColorOutput "Merging .gemini directory contents to local location..." $ColorInfo
     $geminiMerged = Merge-DirectoryContents -Source $sourceGeminiDir -Destination $localGeminiDir -Description ".gemini directory contents" -BackupFolder $backupFolder
 
+    # Merge .qwen directory contents to local location
+    Write-ColorOutput "Merging .qwen directory contents to local location..." $ColorInfo
+    $qwenMerged = Merge-DirectoryContents -Source $sourceQwenDir -Destination $localQwenDir -Description ".qwen directory contents" -BackupFolder $backupFolder
+
     # Create version.json in local .claude directory
     Write-ColorOutput "Creating version.json in local directory..." $ColorInfo
     Create-VersionJson -TargetClaudeDir $localClaudeDir -InstallationMode "Path"
@@ -971,11 +1007,11 @@ function Show-Summary {
     if ($Mode -eq "Path") {
         Write-Host "  Local Path: $Path"
         Write-Host "  Global Path: $([Environment]::GetFolderPath('UserProfile'))"
-        Write-Host "  Local Components: agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini"
+        Write-Host "  Local Components: agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini, .qwen"
         Write-Host "  Global Components: workflows, scripts, python_script, etc."
     } else {
         Write-Host "  Path: $Path"
-        Write-Host "  Global Components: .claude, .codex, .gemini"
+        Write-Host "  Global Components: .claude, .codex, .gemini, .qwen"
     }
 
     if ($NoBackup) {
@@ -991,10 +1027,11 @@ function Show-Summary {
     Write-Host "1. Review CLAUDE.md - Customize guidelines for your project"
     Write-Host "2. Review .codex/Agent.md - Codex agent execution protocol"
     Write-Host "3. Review .gemini/CLAUDE.md - Gemini agent execution protocol"
-    Write-Host "4. Configure settings - Edit .claude/settings.local.json as needed"
-    Write-Host "5. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflow coordination!"
-    Write-Host "6. Use /workflow commands for task execution"
-    Write-Host "7. Use /update-memory commands for memory system management"
+    Write-Host "4. Review .qwen/QWEN.md - Qwen agent execution protocol"
+    Write-Host "5. Configure settings - Edit .claude/settings.local.json as needed"
+    Write-Host "6. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflow coordination!"
+    Write-Host "7. Use /workflow commands for task execution"
+    Write-Host "8. Use /update-memory commands for memory system management"
 
     Write-Host ""
     Write-ColorOutput "Documentation: https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-CCW" $ColorInfo
@@ -1002,7 +1039,10 @@ function Show-Summary {
 }
 
 function Main {
-    Show-Header
+    # Use SourceVersion parameter if provided, otherwise use default
+    $installVersion = if ($SourceVersion) { $SourceVersion } else { $DefaultVersion }
+
+    Show-Header -InstallVersion $installVersion
 
     # Test prerequisites
     Write-ColorOutput "Checking system requirements..." $ColorInfo

Install-Claude.sh

@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ FORCE=false
 NON_INTERACTIVE=false
 BACKUP_ALL=true  # Enabled by default
 NO_BACKUP=false
+SOURCE_VERSION=""  # Version from remote installer
+SOURCE_BRANCH=""   # Branch from remote installer
+SOURCE_COMMIT=""   # Commit SHA from remote installer
 
 # Functions
 function write_color() {
@@ -87,8 +90,8 @@ function show_header() {
 
 function test_prerequisites() {
     # Test bash version
-    if [ "${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}" -lt 4 ]; then
-        write_color "ERROR: Bash 4.0 or higher is required" "$COLOR_ERROR"
+    if [ "${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}" -lt 2 ]; then
+        write_color "ERROR: Bash 2.0 or higher is required" "$COLOR_ERROR"
         write_color "Current version: ${BASH_VERSION}" "$COLOR_ERROR"
         return 1
     fi
@@ -99,6 +102,7 @@ function test_prerequisites() {
     local claude_md="$script_dir/CLAUDE.md"
     local codex_dir="$script_dir/.codex"
     local gemini_dir="$script_dir/.gemini"
+    local qwen_dir="$script_dir/.qwen"
 
     if [ ! -d "$claude_dir" ]; then
         write_color "ERROR: .claude directory not found in $script_dir" "$COLOR_ERROR"
@@ -120,6 +124,11 @@ function test_prerequisites() {
         return 1
     fi
 
+    if [ ! -d "$qwen_dir" ]; then
+        write_color "ERROR: .qwen directory not found in $script_dir" "$COLOR_ERROR"
+        return 1
+    fi
+
     write_color "✓ Prerequisites check passed" "$COLOR_SUCCESS"
     return 0
 }
@@ -403,6 +412,7 @@ function install_global() {
     local global_claude_md="${global_claude_dir}/CLAUDE.md"
     local global_codex_dir="${user_home}/.codex"
     local global_gemini_dir="${user_home}/.gemini"
+    local global_qwen_dir="${user_home}/.qwen"
 
     write_color "Global installation path: $user_home" "$COLOR_INFO"
 
@@ -412,6 +422,7 @@ function install_global() {
     local source_claude_md="${script_dir}/CLAUDE.md"
     local source_codex_dir="${script_dir}/.codex"
     local source_gemini_dir="${script_dir}/.gemini"
+    local source_qwen_dir="${script_dir}/.qwen"
 
     # Create backup folder if needed
     local backup_folder=""
@@ -424,6 +435,8 @@ function install_global() {
             has_existing_files=true
         elif [ -d "$global_gemini_dir" ] && [ "$(ls -A "$global_gemini_dir" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
             has_existing_files=true
+        elif [ -d "$global_qwen_dir" ] && [ "$(ls -A "$global_qwen_dir" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
+            has_existing_files=true
         elif [ -f "$global_claude_md" ]; then
             has_existing_files=true
         fi
@@ -450,6 +463,10 @@ function install_global() {
     write_color "Merging .gemini directory contents..." "$COLOR_INFO"
     merge_directory_contents "$source_gemini_dir" "$global_gemini_dir" ".gemini directory contents" "$backup_folder"
 
+    # Merge .qwen directory contents
+    write_color "Merging .qwen directory contents..." "$COLOR_INFO"
+    merge_directory_contents "$source_qwen_dir" "$global_qwen_dir" ".qwen directory contents" "$backup_folder"
+
     # Remove empty backup folder
     if [ -n "$backup_folder" ] && [ -d "$backup_folder" ]; then
         if [ -z "$(ls -A "$backup_folder" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
@@ -458,6 +475,10 @@ function install_global() {
         fi
     fi
 
+    # Create version.json in global .claude directory
+    write_color "Creating version.json..." "$COLOR_INFO"
+    create_version_json "$global_claude_dir" "Global"
+
     return 0
 }
 
@@ -477,16 +498,18 @@ function install_path() {
     local source_claude_md="${script_dir}/CLAUDE.md"
     local source_codex_dir="${script_dir}/.codex"
     local source_gemini_dir="${script_dir}/.gemini"
+    local source_qwen_dir="${script_dir}/.qwen"
 
     # Local paths
     local local_claude_dir="${target_dir}/.claude"
     local local_codex_dir="${target_dir}/.codex"
     local local_gemini_dir="${target_dir}/.gemini"
+    local local_qwen_dir="${target_dir}/.qwen"
 
     # Create backup folder if needed
     local backup_folder=""
     if [ "$NO_BACKUP" = false ]; then
-        if [ -d "$local_claude_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_codex_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_gemini_dir" ] || [ -d "$global_claude_dir" ]; then
+        if [ -d "$local_claude_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_codex_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_gemini_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_qwen_dir" ] || [ -d "$global_claude_dir" ]; then
             backup_folder=$(get_backup_directory "$target_dir")
             write_color "Backup folder created: $backup_folder" "$COLOR_INFO"
         fi
@@ -575,6 +598,10 @@ function install_path() {
     write_color "Merging .gemini directory contents to local location..." "$COLOR_INFO"
     merge_directory_contents "$source_gemini_dir" "$local_gemini_dir" ".gemini directory contents" "$backup_folder"
 
+    # Merge .qwen directory contents to local location
+    write_color "Merging .qwen directory contents to local location..." "$COLOR_INFO"
+    merge_directory_contents "$source_qwen_dir" "$local_qwen_dir" ".qwen directory contents" "$backup_folder"
+
     # Remove empty backup folder
     if [ -n "$backup_folder" ] && [ -d "$backup_folder" ]; then
         if [ -z "$(ls -A "$backup_folder" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
@@ -583,12 +610,20 @@ function install_path() {
         fi
     fi
 
+    # Create version.json in local .claude directory
+    write_color "Creating version.json in local directory..." "$COLOR_INFO"
+    create_version_json "$local_claude_dir" "Path"
+
+    # Also create version.json in global .claude directory
+    write_color "Creating version.json in global directory..." "$COLOR_INFO"
+    create_version_json "$global_claude_dir" "Global"
+
     return 0
 }
 
 function get_installation_mode() {
     if [ -n "$INSTALL_MODE" ]; then
-        write_color "Installation mode: $INSTALL_MODE" "$COLOR_INFO"
+        write_color "Installation mode: $INSTALL_MODE" "$COLOR_INFO" >&2
         echo "$INSTALL_MODE"
         return
     fi
@@ -658,6 +693,42 @@ function get_installation_path() {
     done
 }
 
+function create_version_json() {
+    local target_claude_dir="$1"
+    local installation_mode="$2"
+
+    # Determine version from source parameter (passed from install-remote.sh)
+    local version_number="${SOURCE_VERSION:-unknown}"
+    local source_branch="${SOURCE_BRANCH:-unknown}"
+    local commit_sha="${SOURCE_COMMIT:-unknown}"
+
+    # Get current UTC timestamp
+    local installation_date_utc=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" 2>/dev/null || date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
+
+    # Create version.json content
+    local version_json_path="${target_claude_dir}/version.json"
+
+    cat > "$version_json_path" << EOF
+{
+  "version": "$version_number",
+  "commit_sha": "$commit_sha",
+  "installation_mode": "$installation_mode",
+  "installation_path": "$target_claude_dir",
+  "installation_date_utc": "$installation_date_utc",
+  "source_branch": "$source_branch",
+  "installer_version": "$VERSION"
+}
+EOF
+
+    if [ -f "$version_json_path" ]; then
+        write_color "Created version.json: $version_number ($commit_sha) - $installation_mode" "$COLOR_SUCCESS"
+        return 0
+    else
+        write_color "WARNING: Failed to create version.json" "$COLOR_WARNING"
+        return 1
+    fi
+}
+
 function show_summary() {
     local mode="$1"
     local path="$2"
@@ -676,11 +747,11 @@ function show_summary() {
     if [ "$mode" = "Path" ]; then
         echo "  Local Path: $path"
         echo "  Global Path: $HOME"
-        echo "  Local Components: agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini"
+        echo "  Local Components: agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini, .qwen"
         echo "  Global Components: workflows, scripts, python_script, etc."
     else
         echo "  Path: $path"
-        echo "  Global Components: .claude, .codex, .gemini"
+        echo "  Global Components: .claude, .codex, .gemini, .qwen"
     fi
 
     if [ "$NO_BACKUP" = true ]; then
@@ -696,10 +767,11 @@ function show_summary() {
     echo "1. Review CLAUDE.md - Customize guidelines for your project"
     echo "2. Review .codex/Agent.md - Codex agent execution protocol"
     echo "3. Review .gemini/CLAUDE.md - Gemini agent execution protocol"
-    echo "4. Configure settings - Edit .claude/settings.local.json as needed"
-    echo "5. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflow coordination!"
-    echo "6. Use /workflow commands for task execution"
-    echo "7. Use /update-memory commands for memory system management"
+    echo "4. Review .qwen/QWEN.md - Qwen agent execution protocol"
+    echo "5. Configure settings - Edit .claude/settings.local.json as needed"
+    echo "6. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflow coordination!"
+    echo "7. Use /workflow commands for task execution"
+    echo "8. Use /update-memory commands for memory system management"
 
     echo ""
     write_color "Documentation: https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow" "$COLOR_INFO"
@@ -735,6 +807,18 @@ function parse_arguments() {
                 BACKUP_ALL=false
                 shift
                 ;;
+            -SourceVersion)
+                SOURCE_VERSION="$2"
+                shift 2
+                ;;
+            -SourceBranch)
+                SOURCE_BRANCH="$2"
+                shift 2
+                ;;
+            -SourceCommit)
+                SOURCE_COMMIT="$2"
+                shift 2
+                ;;
             --help|-h)
                 show_help
                 exit 0
@@ -761,6 +845,9 @@ Options:
     -NonInteractive       Run in non-interactive mode with default options
     -BackupAll            Automatically backup all existing files (default)
     -NoBackup             Disable automatic backup functionality
+    -SourceVersion <ver>  Source version (passed from install-remote.sh)
+    -SourceBranch <name>  Source branch (passed from install-remote.sh)
+    -SourceCommit <sha>   Source commit SHA (passed from install-remote.sh)
     --help, -h            Show this help message
 
 Examples:
@@ -776,6 +863,9 @@ Examples:
     # Installation without backup
     $0 -NoBackup
 
+    # With version info (typically called by install-remote.sh)
+    $0 -InstallMode Global -Force -SourceVersion "3.4.2" -SourceBranch "main" -SourceCommit "abc1234"
+
 EOF
 }
 

README.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 <div align="center">
 
-[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.2.3-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
+[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.5.0-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
 [![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green.svg)](LICENSE)
 [![Platform](https://img.shields.io/badge/platform-Windows%20%7C%20Linux%20%7C%20macOS-lightgrey.svg)]()
 [![MCP Tools](https://img.shields.io/badge/🔧_MCP_Tools-Experimental-orange.svg)](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol)
@@ -15,14 +15,16 @@
 
 **Claude Code Workflow (CCW)** is a next-generation multi-agent automation framework that orchestrates complex software development tasks through intelligent workflow management and autonomous execution.
 
-> **🎉 Latest: v3.2.3** - Version management system with upgrade notifications. See [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) for details.
+> **🎉 Latest: v3.5.0** - UI Design Workflow with Triple Vision Analysis. See [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) for details.
 >
-> **What's New in v3.2.3**:
-> - 🔍 New `/version` command for checking installed versions
-> - 📊 GitHub API integration for latest release detection
-> - 🔄 Automatic upgrade notifications and recommendations
-> - 📁 Version tracking in both local and global installations
-> - ⚡ Quick version check with comprehensive status display
+> **What's New in v3.5.0**:
+> - 🎨 **UI Design Workflow**: Complete design refinement workflow from style extraction to prototype generation
+> - 👁️ **Triple Vision Analysis**: Combines Claude Code + Gemini + Codex vision capabilities for comprehensive style extraction
+> - ⏸️ **Interactive Checkpoints**: User selection points for style variants and prototype confirmation
+> - 🎯 **Zero Agent Overhead**: Direct bash execution for CLI tools, removing unnecessary agent wrappers
+> - 🎨 **Style Customization**: Runtime override support with `--style-overrides` parameter
+> - 📦 **Batch Task Generation**: Optional automatic task creation for selected prototypes with `--batch-plan`
+> - 🔄 **Semi-Autonomous Workflow**: User-driven continuation at critical design decision points
 
 ---
 
@@ -143,6 +145,98 @@ After installation, run the following command to ensure CCW is working:
 
 ---
 
+## ⚙️ Configuration
+
+### **Prerequisites: Required Tools**
+
+Before using CCW, install the following command-line tools:
+
+#### **Core CLI Tools**
+
+| Tool | Purpose | Installation |
+|------|---------|--------------|
+| **Gemini CLI** | AI analysis & documentation | `npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` ([GitHub](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli)) |
+| **Codex CLI** | AI development & implementation | `npm install -g @openai/codex` ([GitHub](https://github.com/openai/codex)) |
+| **Qwen Code** | AI architecture & code generation | `npm install -g @qwen-code/qwen-code` ([Docs](https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code)) |
+
+#### **System Utilities**
+
+| Tool | Purpose | Installation |
+|------|---------|--------------|
+| **ripgrep (rg)** | Fast code search | [Download](https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases) or `brew install ripgrep` (macOS), `apt install ripgrep` (Ubuntu) |
+| **jq** | JSON processing | [Download](https://jqlang.github.io/jq/download/) or `brew install jq` (macOS), `apt install jq` (Ubuntu) |
+
+**Quick Install (All Tools):**
+
+```bash
+# macOS
+brew install ripgrep jq
+npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
+
+# Ubuntu/Debian
+sudo apt install ripgrep jq
+npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
+
+# Windows (Chocolatey)
+choco install ripgrep jq
+npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
+```
+
+### **Essential: Gemini CLI Setup**
+
+Configure Gemini CLI for optimal integration:
+
+```json
+// ~/.gemini/settings.json
+{
+  "contextFileName": ["CLAUDE.md", "GEMINI.md"]
+}
+```
+
+### **Recommended: .geminiignore**
+
+Optimize performance by excluding unnecessary files:
+
+```bash
+# .geminiignore (in project root)
+/dist/
+/build/
+/node_modules/
+/.next/
+*.tmp
+*.log
+/temp/
+
+# Include important docs
+!README.md
+!**/CLAUDE.md
+```
+
+### **Recommended: MCP Tools** *(Enhanced Analysis)*
+
+MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools provide advanced codebase analysis. **Recommended installation** - While CCW has fallback mechanisms, not installing MCP tools may lead to unexpected behavior or degraded performance in some workflows.
+
+#### Available MCP Servers
+
+| MCP Server | Purpose | Installation Guide |
+|------------|---------|-------------------|
+| **Exa MCP** | External API patterns & best practices | [Install Guide](https://smithery.ai/server/exa) |
+| **Code Index MCP** | Advanced internal code search | [Install Guide](https://github.com/johnhuang316/code-index-mcp) |
+
+#### Benefits When Enabled
+- 📊 **Faster Analysis**: Direct codebase indexing vs manual searching
+- 🌐 **External Context**: Real-world API patterns and examples
+- 🔍 **Advanced Search**: Pattern matching and similarity detection
+- ⚡ **Better Reliability**: Primary tools for certain workflows
+
+⚠️ **Note**: Some workflows expect MCP tools to be available. Without them, you may experience:
+- Slower code analysis and search operations
+- Reduced context quality in some scenarios
+- Fallback to less efficient traditional tools
+- Potential unexpected behavior in advanced workflows
+
+---
+
 ## 🚀 Getting Started
 
 ### Complete Development Workflow
@@ -157,7 +251,19 @@ After installation, run the following command to ensure CCW is working:
 /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis  # Generate consolidated specification
 ```
 
-**Phase 2: Action Planning**
+**Phase 2: UI Design Refinement** *(Optional for UI-heavy projects)*
+```bash
+# Extract design styles from reference images and generate prototypes
+/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png" --pages "login,register" --batch-plan
+
+# Or run individual design phases
+/workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png"
+/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-auth --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
+/workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-auth --pages "login,register" --variants 2
+/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-auth --selected-prototypes "login-variant-1,register-variant-2"
+```
+
+**Phase 3: Action Planning**
 ```bash
 # Create executable implementation plan
 /workflow:plan "Implement JWT-based authentication system"
@@ -166,7 +272,7 @@ After installation, run the following command to ensure CCW is working:
 /workflow:tdd-plan "Implement authentication with test-first development"
 ```
 
-**Phase 3: Execution**
+**Phase 4: Execution**
 ```bash
 # Execute tasks with AI agents
 /workflow:execute
@@ -175,7 +281,7 @@ After installation, run the following command to ensure CCW is working:
 /workflow:status
 ```
 
-**Phase 4: Testing & Quality Assurance**
+**Phase 5: Testing & Quality Assurance**
 ```bash
 # Generate independent test-fix workflow (v3.2.2+)
 /workflow:test-gen WFS-auth  # Creates WFS-test-auth session
@@ -248,13 +354,21 @@ After installation, run the following command to ensure CCW is working:
 |---|---|
 | `/workflow:session:*` | Manage development sessions (`start`, `pause`, `resume`, `list`, `switch`, `complete`). |
 | `/workflow:brainstorm:*` | Use role-based agents for multi-perspective planning. |
+| `/workflow:design:auto` | **NEW** Semi-autonomous UI design workflow with interactive checkpoints for style and prototype selection. |
+| `/workflow:design:style-extract` | **NEW** Extract design styles from reference images using triple vision analysis (Claude + Gemini + Codex). |
+| `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` | **NEW** Consolidate selected style variants into validated design tokens and style guide. |
+| `/workflow:design:ui-generate` | **NEW** Generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes with optional style overrides. |
+| `/workflow:design:design-update` | **NEW** Integrate finalized design system into brainstorming artifacts. |
 | `/workflow:plan` | Create a detailed, executable plan from a description. |
-| `/workflow:tdd-plan` | Create a Test-Driven Development workflow with Red-Green-Refactor cycles. |
+| `/workflow:tdd-plan` | Create TDD workflow (6 phases) with test coverage analysis and Red-Green-Refactor cycles. |
 | `/workflow:execute` | Execute the current workflow plan autonomously. |
 | `/workflow:status` | Display the current status of the workflow. |
-| `/workflow:test-gen` | Create independent test-fix workflow for validating completed implementation. |
+| `/workflow:test-gen [--use-codex] <session>` | Create test generation workflow with auto-diagnosis and fix cycle for completed implementations. |
 | `/workflow:tdd-verify` | Verify TDD compliance and generate quality report. |
 | `/workflow:review` | **Optional** manual review (only use when explicitly needed - passing tests = approved code). |
+| `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` | Analyze test coverage and identify missing test files. |
+| `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` | Generate test strategy and requirements analysis using Gemini. |
+| `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` | Generate test task JSON with test-fix-cycle specification. |
 
 ### **Task & Memory Commands**
 
@@ -267,92 +381,6 @@ After installation, run the following command to ensure CCW is working:
 
 ---
 
-## ⚙️ Configuration
-
-### **Prerequisites: Required Tools**
-
-Before using CCW, install the following command-line tools:
-
-#### **Core CLI Tools**
-
-| Tool | Purpose | Installation |
-|------|---------|--------------|
-| **Gemini CLI** | AI analysis & documentation | `npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` ([GitHub](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli)) |
-| **Codex CLI** | AI development & implementation | `npm install -g @openai/codex` ([GitHub](https://github.com/openai/codex)) |
-| **Qwen Code** | AI architecture & code generation | `npm install -g @qwen-code/qwen-code` ([Docs](https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code)) |
-
-#### **System Utilities**
-
-| Tool | Purpose | Installation |
-|------|---------|--------------|
-| **ripgrep (rg)** | Fast code search | [Download](https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases) or `brew install ripgrep` (macOS), `apt install ripgrep` (Ubuntu) |
-| **jq** | JSON processing | [Download](https://jqlang.github.io/jq/download/) or `brew install jq` (macOS), `apt install jq` (Ubuntu) |
-
-**Quick Install (All Tools):**
-
-```bash
-# macOS
-brew install ripgrep jq
-npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
-
-# Ubuntu/Debian
-sudo apt install ripgrep jq
-npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
-
-# Windows (Chocolatey)
-choco install ripgrep jq
-npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
-```
-
-### **Essential: Gemini CLI Setup**
-
-Configure Gemini CLI for optimal integration:
-
-```json
-// ~/.gemini/settings.json
-{
-  "contextFileName": ["CLAUDE.md", "GEMINI.md"]
-}
-```
-
-### **Recommended: .geminiignore**
-
-Optimize performance by excluding unnecessary files:
-
-```bash
-# .geminiignore (in project root)
-/dist/
-/build/
-/node_modules/
-/.next/
-*.tmp
-*.log
-/temp/
-
-# Include important docs
-!README.md
-!**/CLAUDE.md
-```
-
-### **Optional: MCP Tools** *(Enhanced Analysis)*
-
-MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools provide advanced codebase analysis. **Completely optional** - CCW works perfectly without them.
-
-#### Available MCP Servers
-
-| MCP Server | Purpose | Installation Guide |
-|------------|---------|-------------------|
-| **Exa MCP** | External API patterns & best practices | [Install Guide](https://github.com/exa-labs/exa-mcp-server) |
-| **Code Index MCP** | Advanced internal code search | [Install Guide](https://github.com/johnhuang316/code-index-mcp) |
-
-#### Benefits When Enabled
-- 📊 **Faster Analysis**: Direct codebase indexing vs manual searching
-- 🌐 **External Context**: Real-world API patterns and examples
-- 🔍 **Advanced Search**: Pattern matching and similarity detection
-- ⚡ **Automatic Fallback**: Uses traditional tools when MCP unavailable
-
----
-
 ## 🧩 How It Works: Design Philosophy
 
 ### The Core Problem

README_CN.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 <div align="center">
 
-[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.2.3-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
+[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.5.0-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
 [![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green.svg)](LICENSE)
 [![Platform](https://img.shields.io/badge/platform-Windows%20%7C%20Linux%20%7C%20macOS-lightgrey.svg)]()
 [![MCP工具](https://img.shields.io/badge/🔧_MCP工具-实验性-orange.svg)](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol)
@@ -15,14 +15,16 @@
 
 **Claude Code Workflow (CCW)** 是一个新一代的多智能体自动化开发框架，通过智能工作流管理和自主执行来协调复杂的软件开发任务。
 
-> **🎉 最新版本: v3.2.3** - 版本管理系统与升级通知。详见 [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)。
+> **🎉 最新版本: v3.5.0** - UI 设计工作流与三重视觉分析。详见 [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)。
 >
-> **v3.2.3 版本新特性**:
-> - 🔍 新增 `/version` 命令用于检查已安装版本
-> - 📊 GitHub API 集成，获取最新版本信息
-> - 🔄 自动升级通知与建议
-> - 📁 支持本地和全局安装的版本跟踪
-> - ⚡ 一键版本检查，全面展示状态信息
+> **v3.5.0 版本新特性**:
+> - 🎨 **UI 设计工作流**: 从风格提取到原型生成的完整设计精炼工作流
+> - 👁️ **三重视觉分析**: 融合 Claude Code + Gemini + Codex 视觉能力进行综合风格提取
+> - ⏸️ **交互式检查点**: 用户选择风格变体和原型确认的决策点
+> - 🎯 **零智能体开销**: CLI 工具直接 bash 执行，移除不必要的智能体包装
+> - 🎨 **风格自定义**: 通过 `--style-overrides` 参数支持运行时样式覆盖
+> - 📦 **批量任务生成**: 使用 `--batch-plan` 为选定原型自动创建实现任务
+> - 🔄 **半自主工作流**: 在关键设计决策点由用户驱动继续
 
 ---
 
@@ -143,6 +145,98 @@ bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflo
 
 ---
 
+## ⚙️ 配置
+
+### **前置要求：必需工具**
+
+在使用 CCW 之前，请安装以下命令行工具：
+
+#### **核心 CLI 工具**
+
+| 工具 | 用途 | 安装方式 |
+|------|------|----------|
+| **Gemini CLI** | AI 分析与文档生成 | `npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` ([GitHub](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli)) |
+| **Codex CLI** | AI 开发与实现 | `npm install -g @openai/codex` ([GitHub](https://github.com/openai/codex)) |
+| **Qwen Code** | AI 架构与代码生成 | `npm install -g @qwen-code/qwen-code` ([文档](https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code)) |
+
+#### **系统实用工具**
+
+| 工具 | 用途 | 安装方式 |
+|------|------|----------|
+| **ripgrep (rg)** | 快速代码搜索 | [下载](https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases) 或 `brew install ripgrep` (macOS), `apt install ripgrep` (Ubuntu) |
+| **jq** | JSON 处理 | [下载](https://jqlang.github.io/jq/download/) 或 `brew install jq` (macOS), `apt install jq` (Ubuntu) |
+
+**快速安装（所有工具）：**
+
+```bash
+# macOS
+brew install ripgrep jq
+npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
+
+# Ubuntu/Debian
+sudo apt install ripgrep jq
+npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
+
+# Windows (Chocolatey)
+choco install ripgrep jq
+npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
+```
+
+### **必需: Gemini CLI 设置**
+
+配置 Gemini CLI 以实现最佳集成：
+
+```json
+// ~/.gemini/settings.json
+{
+  "contextFileName": ["CLAUDE.md", "GEMINI.md"]
+}
+```
+
+### **推荐: .geminiignore**
+
+通过排除不必要的文件来优化性能：
+
+```bash
+# .geminiignore (在项目根目录)
+/dist/
+/build/
+/node_modules/
+/.next/
+*.tmp
+*.log
+/temp/
+
+# 包含重要文档
+!README.md
+!**/CLAUDE.md
+```
+
+### **推荐: MCP 工具** *(增强分析)*
+
+MCP (模型上下文协议) 工具提供高级代码库分析。**推荐安装** - 虽然 CCW 具有回退机制，但不安装 MCP 工具可能会导致某些工作流出现意外行为或性能下降。
+
+#### 可用的 MCP 服务器
+
+| MCP 服务器 | 用途 | 安装指南 |
+|------------|------|---------|
+| **Exa MCP** | 外部 API 模式和最佳实践 | [安装指南](https://smithery.ai/server/exa) |
+| **Code Index MCP** | 高级内部代码搜索 | [安装指南](https://github.com/johnhuang316/code-index-mcp) |
+
+#### 启用后的好处
+- 📊 **更快分析**: 直接代码库索引 vs 手动搜索
+- 🌐 **外部上下文**: 真实世界的 API 模式和示例
+- 🔍 **高级搜索**: 模式匹配和相似性检测
+- ⚡ **更好的可靠性**: 某些工作流的主要工具
+
+⚠️ **注意**: 某些工作流期望 MCP 工具可用。如果没有安装，您可能会遇到：
+- 代码分析和搜索操作速度较慢
+- 某些场景下上下文质量降低
+- 回退到效率较低的传统工具
+- 高级工作流中可能出现意外行为
+
+---
+
 ## 🚀 快速入门
 
 ### 完整开发工作流
@@ -157,7 +251,19 @@ bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflo
 /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis  # 生成综合规范
 ```
 
-**阶段 2：行动规划**
+**阶段 2：UI 设计精炼** *(UI 密集型项目可选)*
+```bash
+# 从参考图像中提取设计风格并生成原型
+/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png" --pages "login,register" --batch-plan
+
+# 或者运行单独的设计阶段
+/workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png"
+/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-auth --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
+/workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-auth --pages "login,register" --variants 2
+/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-auth --selected-prototypes "login-variant-1,register-variant-2"
+```
+
+**阶段 3：行动规划**
 ```bash
 # 创建可执行的实现计划
 /workflow:plan "实现基于 JWT 的认证系统"
@@ -166,7 +272,7 @@ bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflo
 /workflow:tdd-plan "使用测试优先开发实现认证"
 ```
 
-**阶段 3：执行**
+**阶段 4：执行**
 ```bash
 # 使用 AI 智能体执行任务
 /workflow:execute
@@ -175,7 +281,7 @@ bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflo
 /workflow:status
 ```
 
-**阶段 4：测试与质量保证**
+**阶段 5：测试与质量保证**
 ```bash
 # 生成独立测试修复工作流（v3.2.2+）
 /workflow:test-gen WFS-auth  # 创建 WFS-test-auth 会话
@@ -248,13 +354,21 @@ bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflo
 |---|---|
 | `/workflow:session:*` | 管理开发会话（`start`, `pause`, `resume`, `list`, `switch`, `complete`）。 |
 | `/workflow:brainstorm:*` | 使用基于角色的智能体进行多视角规划。 |
+| `/workflow:design:auto` | **新增** 带交互式检查点的半自主 UI 设计工作流，用于风格和原型选择。 |
+| `/workflow:design:style-extract` | **新增** 使用三重视觉分析（Claude + Gemini + Codex）从参考图像提取设计风格。 |
+| `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` | **新增** 将选定的风格变体整合为经过验证的设计令牌和风格指南。 |
+| `/workflow:design:ui-generate` | **新增** 生成基于令牌的 HTML/CSS 原型，支持可选的风格覆盖。 |
+| `/workflow:design:design-update` | **新增** 将最终确定的设计系统集成到头脑风暴产物中。 |
 | `/workflow:plan` | 从描述创建详细、可执行的计划。 |
-| `/workflow:tdd-plan` | 创建测试驱动开发工作流，包含 Red-Green-Refactor 循环。 |
+| `/workflow:tdd-plan` | 创建 TDD 工作流（6 阶段），包含测试覆盖分析和 Red-Green-Refactor 循环。 |
 | `/workflow:execute` | 自主执行当前的工作流计划。 |
 | `/workflow:status` | 显示工作流的当前状态。 |
-| `/workflow:test-gen` | 创建独立测试修复工作流，用于验证已完成的实现。 |
+| `/workflow:test-gen [--use-codex] <session>` | 为已完成实现创建独立测试生成工作流，支持自动诊断和修复。 |
 | `/workflow:tdd-verify` | 验证 TDD 合规性并生成质量报告。 |
 | `/workflow:review` | **可选** 手动审查（仅在明确需要时使用，测试通过即代表代码已批准）。 |
+| `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` | 分析测试覆盖率，识别缺失的测试文件。 |
+| `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` | 使用 Gemini 生成测试策略和需求分析。 |
+| `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` | 生成测试任务 JSON，包含 test-fix-cycle 规范。 |
 
 ### **任务与内存命令**
 
@@ -267,92 +381,6 @@ bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflo
 
 ---
 
-## ⚙️ 配置
-
-### **前置要求：必需工具**
-
-在使用 CCW 之前，请安装以下命令行工具：
-
-#### **核心 CLI 工具**
-
-| 工具 | 用途 | 安装方式 |
-|------|------|----------|
-| **Gemini CLI** | AI 分析与文档生成 | `npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` ([GitHub](https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli)) |
-| **Codex CLI** | AI 开发与实现 | `npm install -g @openai/codex` ([GitHub](https://github.com/openai/codex)) |
-| **Qwen Code** | AI 架构与代码生成 | `npm install -g @qwen-code/qwen-code` ([文档](https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code)) |
-
-#### **系统实用工具**
-
-| 工具 | 用途 | 安装方式 |
-|------|------|----------|
-| **ripgrep (rg)** | 快速代码搜索 | [下载](https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases) 或 `brew install ripgrep` (macOS), `apt install ripgrep` (Ubuntu) |
-| **jq** | JSON 处理 | [下载](https://jqlang.github.io/jq/download/) 或 `brew install jq` (macOS), `apt install jq` (Ubuntu) |
-
-**快速安装（所有工具）：**
-
-```bash
-# macOS
-brew install ripgrep jq
-npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
-
-# Ubuntu/Debian
-sudo apt install ripgrep jq
-npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
-
-# Windows (Chocolatey)
-choco install ripgrep jq
-npm install -g @google/gemini-cli @openai/codex @qwen-code/qwen-code
-```
-
-### **必需: Gemini CLI 设置**
-
-配置 Gemini CLI 以实现最佳集成：
-
-```json
-// ~/.gemini/settings.json
-{
-  "contextFileName": ["CLAUDE.md", "GEMINI.md"]
-}
-```
-
-### **推荐: .geminiignore**
-
-通过排除不必要的文件来优化性能：
-
-```bash
-# .geminiignore (在项目根目录)
-/dist/
-/build/
-/node_modules/
-/.next/
-*.tmp
-*.log
-/temp/
-
-# 包含重要文档
-!README.md
-!**/CLAUDE.md
-```
-
-### **可选: MCP 工具** *(增强分析)*
-
-MCP (模型上下文协议) 工具提供高级代码库分析。**完全可选** - CCW 在没有它们的情况下也能完美工作。
-
-#### 可用的 MCP 服务器
-
-| MCP 服务器 | 用途 | 安装指南 |
-|------------|------|---------|
-| **Exa MCP** | 外部 API 模式和最佳实践 | [安装指南](https://github.com/exa-labs/exa-mcp-server) |
-| **Code Index MCP** | 高级内部代码搜索 | [安装指南](https://github.com/johnhuang316/code-index-mcp) |
-
-#### 启用后的好处
-- 📊 **更快分析**: 直接代码库索引 vs 手动搜索
-- 🌐 **外部上下文**: 真实世界的 API 模式和示例
-- 🔍 **高级搜索**: 模式匹配和相似性检测
-- ⚡ **自动回退**: MCP 不可用时使用传统工具
-
----
-
 ## 🧩 工作原理：设计理念
 
 ### 核心问题

install-remote.ps1

@@ -260,7 +260,8 @@ function Invoke-LocalInstaller {
     param(
         [string]$RepoDir,
         [string]$VersionInfo = "",
-        [string]$BranchInfo = ""
+        [string]$BranchInfo = "",
+        [string]$CommitSha = ""
     )
 
     $installerPath = Join-Path $RepoDir "Install-Claude.ps1"
@@ -285,9 +286,10 @@ function Invoke-LocalInstaller {
     if ($NonInteractive) { $params["NonInteractive"] = $NonInteractive }
     if ($BackupAll) { $params["BackupAll"] = $BackupAll }
 
-    # Pass version and branch information
+    # Pass version, branch, and commit information
     if ($VersionInfo) { $params["SourceVersion"] = $VersionInfo }
     if ($BranchInfo) { $params["SourceBranch"] = $BranchInfo }
+    if ($CommitSha) { $params["SourceCommit"] = $CommitSha }
 
     try {
         # Change to repo directory and run installer
@@ -416,10 +418,10 @@ function Get-UserVersionChoice {
         $response = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri $apiUrl -UseBasicParsing -TimeoutSec 5
         $latestVersion = $response.tag_name
 
-        # Parse and format release date
+        # Parse and format release date to local time
         if ($response.published_at) {
-            $publishDate = [DateTime]::Parse($response.published_at)
-            $latestStableDate = $publishDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm UTC")
+            $publishDate = [DateTime]::Parse($response.published_at).ToLocalTime()
+            $latestStableDate = $publishDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm")
         }
 
         Write-ColorOutput "Latest stable: $latestVersion ($latestStableDate)" $ColorSuccess
@@ -433,10 +435,10 @@ function Get-UserVersionChoice {
         $commitResponse = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri $commitUrl -UseBasicParsing -TimeoutSec 5
         $latestCommitId = $commitResponse.sha.Substring(0, 7)
 
-        # Parse and format commit date
+        # Parse and format commit date to local time
         if ($commitResponse.commit.committer.date) {
-            $commitDate = [DateTime]::Parse($commitResponse.commit.committer.date)
-            $latestCommitDate = $commitDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm UTC")
+            $commitDate = [DateTime]::Parse($commitResponse.commit.committer.date).ToLocalTime()
+            $latestCommitDate = $commitDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm")
         }
 
         Write-ColorOutput "Latest commit: $latestCommitId ($latestCommitDate)" $ColorSuccess
@@ -562,14 +564,51 @@ function Main {
             throw "Extraction failed"
         }
 
+        # Get commit SHA from the downloaded repository first
+        $commitSha = ""
+        try {
+            Push-Location $repoDir
+            $commitSha = (git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>$null)
+            if (-not $commitSha) {
+                # Fallback: try to get from GitHub API
+                $commitUrl = "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/$Branch"
+                $commitResponse = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri $commitUrl -UseBasicParsing -TimeoutSec 5 -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
+                if ($commitResponse.sha) {
+                    $commitSha = $commitResponse.sha.Substring(0, 7)
+                }
+            }
+            Pop-Location
+        } catch {
+            Pop-Location
+            $commitSha = "unknown"
+        }
+
         # Determine version and branch information to pass
-        $versionToPass = if ($Tag) { $Tag } else { "latest" }
+        $versionToPass = ""
+
+        if ($Tag) {
+            # Specific tag version
+            $versionToPass = $Tag -replace '^v', ''  # Remove 'v' prefix
+        } elseif ($Version -eq "stable") {
+            # Auto-detected latest stable
+            $latestTag = Get-LatestRelease
+            if ($latestTag) {
+                $versionToPass = $latestTag -replace '^v', ''
+            } else {
+                # Fallback: use commit SHA as version
+                $versionToPass = "dev-$commitSha"
+            }
+        } else {
+            # Latest development or branch - use commit SHA as version
+            $versionToPass = "dev-$commitSha"
+        }
+
         $branchToPass = if ($Version -eq "branch") { $Branch } elseif ($Version -eq "latest") { "main" } elseif ($Tag) { $Tag } else { "main" }
 
-        Write-ColorOutput "Version info: $versionToPass (branch: $branchToPass)" $ColorInfo
+        Write-ColorOutput "Version info: $versionToPass (branch: $branchToPass, commit: $commitSha)" $ColorInfo
 
         # Run local installer with version information
-        $success = Invoke-LocalInstaller -RepoDir $repoDir -VersionInfo $versionToPass -BranchInfo $branchToPass
+        $success = Invoke-LocalInstaller -RepoDir $repoDir -VersionInfo $versionToPass -BranchInfo $branchToPass -CommitSha $commitSha
         if (-not $success) {
             throw "Installation script failed"
         }

install-remote.sh

@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ function show_header() {
 
 function test_prerequisites() {
     # Test bash version
-    if [ "${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}" -lt 4 ]; then
-        write_color "ERROR: Bash 4.0 or higher is required" "$COLOR_ERROR"
+    if [ "${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}" -lt 2 ]; then
+        write_color "ERROR: Bash 2.0 or higher is required" "$COLOR_ERROR"
         write_color "Current version: ${BASH_VERSION}" "$COLOR_ERROR"
         return 1
     fi
@@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ function extract_repository() {
 
 function invoke_local_installer() {
     local repo_dir="$1"
+    local version_info="$2"
+    local branch_info="$3"
+    local commit_sha="$4"
     local installer_path="${repo_dir}/Install-Claude.sh"
 
     # Make installer executable
@@ -249,6 +252,19 @@ function invoke_local_installer() {
         params+=("-BackupAll")
     fi
 
+    # Pass version, branch, and commit information
+    if [ -n "$version_info" ]; then
+        params+=("-SourceVersion" "$version_info")
+    fi
+
+    if [ -n "$branch_info" ]; then
+        params+=("-SourceBranch" "$branch_info")
+    fi
+
+    if [ -n "$commit_sha" ]; then
+        params+=("-SourceCommit" "$commit_sha")
+    fi
+
     # Execute installer
     if (cd "$repo_dir" && "$installer_path" "${params[@]}"); then
         return 0
@@ -452,14 +468,19 @@ function get_user_version_choice() {
             latest_version=$(echo "$release_data" | jq -r '.tag_name' 2>/dev/null)
             local published_at=$(echo "$release_data" | jq -r '.published_at' 2>/dev/null)
             if [ -n "$published_at" ] && [ "$published_at" != "null" ]; then
-                # Format: 2025-10-02T04:27:21Z -> 2025-10-02 04:27 UTC
-                latest_date=$(echo "$published_at" | sed 's/T/ /' | sed 's/Z/ UTC/' | cut -d'.' -f1)
+                # Convert UTC to local time
+                if command -v date &> /dev/null; then
+                    latest_date=$(date -d "$published_at" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null || date -jf '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' "$published_at" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null)
+                fi
             fi
         else
             latest_version=$(echo "$release_data" | grep -o '"tag_name":\s*"[^"]*"' | sed 's/"tag_name":\s*"\([^"]*\)"/\1/')
             local published_at=$(echo "$release_data" | grep -o '"published_at":\s*"[^"]*"' | sed 's/"published_at":\s*"\([^"]*\)"/\1/')
             if [ -n "$published_at" ]; then
-                latest_date=$(echo "$published_at" | sed 's/T/ /' | sed 's/Z/ UTC/' | cut -d'.' -f1)
+                # Convert UTC to local time
+                if command -v date &> /dev/null; then
+                    latest_date=$(date -d "$published_at" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null || date -jf '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' "$published_at" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null)
+                fi
             fi
         fi
     fi
@@ -480,13 +501,19 @@ function get_user_version_choice() {
             commit_id=$(echo "$commit_data" | jq -r '.sha' 2>/dev/null | cut -c1-7)
             local committer_date=$(echo "$commit_data" | jq -r '.commit.committer.date' 2>/dev/null)
             if [ -n "$committer_date" ] && [ "$committer_date" != "null" ]; then
-                commit_date=$(echo "$committer_date" | sed 's/T/ /' | sed 's/Z/ UTC/' | cut -d'.' -f1)
+                # Convert UTC to local time
+                if command -v date &> /dev/null; then
+                    commit_date=$(date -d "$committer_date" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null || date -jf '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' "$committer_date" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null)
+                fi
             fi
         else
             commit_id=$(echo "$commit_data" | grep -o '"sha":\s*"[^"]*"' | head -1 | sed 's/"sha":\s*"\([^"]*\)"/\1/' | cut -c1-7)
             local committer_date=$(echo "$commit_data" | grep -o '"date":\s*"[^"]*"' | head -1 | sed 's/"date":\s*"\([^"]*\)"/\1/')
             if [ -n "$committer_date" ]; then
-                commit_date=$(echo "$committer_date" | sed 's/T/ /' | sed 's/Z/ UTC/' | cut -d'.' -f1)
+                # Convert UTC to local time
+                if command -v date &> /dev/null; then
+                    commit_date=$(date -d "$committer_date" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null || date -jf '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' "$committer_date" '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M' 2>/dev/null)
+                fi
             fi
         fi
     fi
@@ -621,8 +648,54 @@ function main() {
         if [ $extract_status -eq 0 ] && [ -n "$repo_dir" ] && [ -d "$repo_dir" ]; then
             write_color "Extraction successful: $repo_dir" "$COLOR_SUCCESS"
 
-            # Run local installer
-            if invoke_local_installer "$repo_dir"; then
+            # Get commit SHA from the downloaded repository first
+            local commit_sha=""
+            if command -v git &> /dev/null && [ -d "$repo_dir/.git" ]; then
+                commit_sha=$(cd "$repo_dir" && git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
+            else
+                # Fallback: try to get from GitHub API
+                local temp_branch="main"
+                [ "$VERSION_TYPE" = "branch" ] && temp_branch="$BRANCH"
+                commit_sha=$(curl -fsSL "https://api.github.com/repos/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/commits/$temp_branch" 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"sha": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4 | cut -c1-7)
+                [ -z "$commit_sha" ] && commit_sha="unknown"
+            fi
+
+            # Determine version and branch information to pass
+            local version_to_pass=""
+            local branch_to_pass=""
+
+            if [ -n "$TAG_VERSION" ]; then
+                # Specific tag version - remove 'v' prefix
+                version_to_pass="${TAG_VERSION#v}"
+            elif [ "$VERSION_TYPE" = "stable" ]; then
+                # Auto-detected latest stable
+                local latest_tag
+                latest_tag=$(get_latest_release)
+                if [ -n "$latest_tag" ]; then
+                    version_to_pass="${latest_tag#v}"
+                else
+                    # Fallback: use commit SHA as version
+                    version_to_pass="dev-$commit_sha"
+                fi
+            else
+                # Latest development or branch - use commit SHA as version
+                version_to_pass="dev-$commit_sha"
+            fi
+
+            if [ "$VERSION_TYPE" = "branch" ]; then
+                branch_to_pass="$BRANCH"
+            elif [ "$VERSION_TYPE" = "latest" ]; then
+                branch_to_pass="main"
+            elif [ -n "$TAG_VERSION" ]; then
+                branch_to_pass="$TAG_VERSION"
+            else
+                branch_to_pass="main"
+            fi
+
+            write_color "Version info: $version_to_pass (branch: $branch_to_pass, commit: $commit_sha)" "$COLOR_INFO"
+
+            # Run local installer with version information
+            if invoke_local_installer "$repo_dir" "$version_to_pass" "$branch_to_pass" "$commit_sha"; then
                 success=true
                 echo ""
                 write_color "✓ Remote installation completed successfully!" "$COLOR_SUCCESS"