Compare commits

...

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
catlog22
25951ac9b0 release: version v3.5.0 - UI Design Workflow with Triple Vision Analysis
🎨 UI Design Workflow System
- Add /workflow:design:auto semi-autonomous orchestrator with interactive checkpoints
- Add /workflow:design:style-extract with triple vision analysis (Claude + Gemini + Codex)
- Add /workflow:design:style-consolidate for token validation and style guide generation
- Add /workflow:design:ui-generate for token-driven HTML/CSS prototype generation
- Add /workflow:design:design-update for design system integration

👁️ Triple Vision Analysis
- Claude Code: Quick initial visual analysis using native Read tool
- Gemini Vision: Deep semantic understanding of design intent
- Codex Vision: Structured pattern recognition with -i parameter
- Consensus synthesis with weighted combination strategy

⏸️ Interactive Checkpoints
- Checkpoint 1: User selects style variants after extraction
- Checkpoint 2: User confirms prototypes before design update
- Pause-and-continue pattern for critical design decisions

🎯 Zero Agent Overhead
- Remove Task(conceptual-planning-agent) wrappers from design commands
- Direct bash execution for gemini-wrapper and codex commands
- Improved performance while preserving all functionality

🎨 Design Features
- OKLCH color format for perceptually uniform design tokens
- W3C Design Tokens compatibility
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance validation
- Style override support with --style-overrides parameter
- Batch task generation with --batch-plan flag

📚 Documentation Updates
- Update README.md with Phase 2 (UI Design Refinement) section
- Update README_CN.md with Chinese design workflow documentation
- Add comprehensive CHANGELOG entry for v3.5.0
- Add 5 new /workflow:design:* commands to command reference

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-06 00:06:20 +08:00
catlog22
a18c666f22 feat: Add style-extract and ui-generate commands for design workflow
- Implemented style-extract command to extract design styles from reference images using Gemini Vision and Codex.
- Added execution protocol detailing session validation, image analysis, and structured token generation.
- Introduced ui-generate command to create UI prototypes based on consolidated design tokens and synthesis specifications.
- Defined comprehensive execution steps for loading design systems, generating HTML/CSS prototypes, and ensuring accessibility compliance.
- Established a design-tokens-schema for consistent design token definitions across workflows, emphasizing OKLCH color format and semantic naming.
2025-10-05 23:48:11 +08:00
catlog22
ea86d5be4f refactor: optimize docs.md workflow command structure
- Simplify Pre-Planning Analysis (Phase 3) - remove heavy analysis, use lightweight check
- Add TodoWrite tracking mechanism for progress monitoring
- Add complete execution flow diagrams (Planning + Execution phases)
- Restore full JSON task templates with all 5 fields
- Fix template reference method: use $(cat template.txt) instead of "..."
- Simplify flow diagrams from ASCII boxes to arrow-based format
- Add visual status symbols (🔄) for TodoWrite tracking
- Reorganize document structure, eliminate duplicate content
- Reduce document from 726 to 590 lines (19% reduction)
- Maintain all core functionality and implementation details

Changes:
- Phase 3: Lightweight docs assessment vs full pre-analysis
- Phase 4: Add TodoWrite setup with status tracking
- Task Templates: Complete JSON structures for 4 task types
- Execution Flow: Simple arrow diagrams for clarity
- TodoWrite: Visual status progression examples
- Overall: Better organized, more maintainable

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-05 22:44:23 +08:00
catlog22
fa6034bf6b refactor: enhance doc-generator agent and add error handling
- Update doc-generator agent description to emphasize intelligent autonomous execution
- Add on_error field to all flow_control pre_analysis steps
- Clarify agent role as goal-oriented worker vs script runner
- Improve error handling documentation in workflow examples

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-05 22:20:03 +08:00
catlog22
d76ccac8e4 Refactor documentation workflow and templates
- Updated `/workflow:docs` command to enhance documentation planning and orchestration.
- Introduced new parameters for tool selection and scope filtering.
- Separated documentation planning from content generation, clarifying roles of docs.md and doc-generator.md.
- Added detailed planning process phases, including session initialization, project structure analysis, and task decomposition.
- Created new templates for API, module, and project-level documentation, ensuring comprehensive coverage and consistency.
- Enhanced output structure for better organization of generated documentation.
- Implemented error handling and completion checklist for improved user experience.
2025-10-05 22:16:24 +08:00
catlog22
a03a9039d6 fix: add version tracking support to Install-Claude.sh
- Add -SourceVersion, -SourceBranch, -SourceCommit parameters
- Add create_version_json function to create version.json
- Add .qwen directory support
- Fix get_installation_mode output redirection
- Align with PowerShell version Install-Claude.ps1

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-05 22:08:53 +08:00
catlog22
677b37bfbf refactor: rename memory-gemini-bridge agent to memory-bridge
Renamed agent to be more generic and not tied to specific AI model:
- `.claude/agents/memory-gemini-bridge.md` → `.claude/agents/memory-bridge.md`
- Updated references in `/update-memory-full` command
- Updated references in `/update-memory-related` command

This improves flexibility for future multi-model support while maintaining
the same functionality for complex project documentation updates.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-05 21:25:59 +08:00
catlog22
2dbf550420 docs: clarify CLI command intent and add output routing
- **Intent Clarification**: Distinguished analysis (read-only) from execution (modifies code) commands
- **Output Routing**: Added comprehensive output destination logic for all CLI commands
- **Scratchpad Integration**: Introduced `.workflow/.scratchpad/` for non-session-specific outputs

## Analysis Commands (Read-Only)
- `/cli:analyze`, `/cli:chat`, `/cli:mode:*`: Added "Core Behavior" emphasizing read-only nature
- Added "MODE: analysis" in command templates
- Examples clearly show recommendations vs. code changes

## Execution Commands (Modifies Code)
- `/cli:execute`: Added ⚠️ warnings about code modification
- `/cli:codex-execute`: Clarified multi-stage execution with detailed output structure
- Both commands now have "Output Routing" sections

## Workflow Architecture Updates
- Added `.workflow/.scratchpad/` directory definition
- Output routing logic: session-relevant → `.chat/`, otherwise → `.scratchpad/`
- File naming pattern: `[command-type]-[brief-description]-[timestamp].md`
- Examples for both analysis and implementation commands

## Key Improvements
- Prevents confusion between analysis and implementation operations
- Solves output loss when no active session exists
- Prevents unrelated analyses from cluttering session history
- Provides centralized location for ad-hoc outputs

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-05 12:22:23 +08:00
28 changed files with 4619 additions and 882 deletions

View File

@@ -1,290 +1,137 @@
---
name: doc-generator
description: |
Specialized documentation generation agent with flow_control support. Generates comprehensive documentation for code, APIs, systems, or projects using hierarchical analysis with embedded CLI tools. Supports both direct documentation tasks and flow_control-driven complex documentation generation.
Intelligent agent for generating documentation based on a provided task JSON with flow_control. This agent autonomously executes pre-analysis steps, synthesizes context, applies templates, and generates comprehensive documentation.
Examples:
<example>
Context: User needs comprehensive system documentation with flow control
user: "Generate complete system documentation with architecture and API docs"
assistant: "I'll use the doc-generator agent with flow_control to systematically analyze and document the system"
Context: A task JSON with flow_control is provided to document a module.
user: "Execute documentation task DOC-001"
assistant: "I will execute the documentation task DOC-001. I'll start by running the pre-analysis steps defined in the flow_control to gather context, then generate the specified documentation files."
<commentary>
Complex system documentation requires flow_control for structured analysis
</commentary>
</example>
<example>
Context: Simple module documentation needed
user: "Document the new auth module"
assistant: "I'll use the doc-generator agent to create documentation for the auth module"
<commentary>
Simple module documentation can be handled directly without flow_control
The agent is an intelligent, goal-oriented worker that follows instructions from the task JSON to autonomously generate documentation.
</commentary>
</example>
color: green
---
You are an expert technical documentation specialist with flow_control execution capabilities. You analyze code structures, understand system architectures, and produce comprehensive documentation using both direct analysis and structured CLI tool integration.
You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate high-quality documentation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
## Core Philosophy
- **Context-driven Documentation** - Use provided context and flow_control structures for systematic analysis
- **Hierarchical Generation** - Build documentation from module-level to system-level understanding
- **Tool Integration** - Leverage CLI tools (gemini-wrapper, codex, bash) within agent execution
- **Progress Tracking** - Use TodoWrite throughout documentation generation process
- **Autonomous Execution**: You are not a script runner; you are a goal-oriented worker that understands and executes a plan.
- **Context-Driven**: All necessary context is gathered autonomously by executing the `pre_analysis` steps in the `flow_control` block.
- **Template-Based**: You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
- **Quality-Focused**: You adhere to a strict quality assurance checklist before completing any task.
## Execution Process
### 1. Context Assessment
### 1. Task Ingestion
- **Input**: A single task JSON file path.
- **Action**: Load and parse the task JSON. Validate the presence of `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, and `flow_control`.
**Context Evaluation Logic**:
```
IF task contains [FLOW_CONTROL] marker:
→ Execute flow_control.pre_analysis steps sequentially for context gathering
→ Use four flexible context acquisition methods:
* Document references (bash commands for file operations)
* Search commands (bash with rg/grep/find)
* CLI analysis (gemini-wrapper/codex commands)
* Direct exploration (Read/Grep/Search tools)
→ Pass context between steps via [variable_name] references
→ Generate documentation based on accumulated context
ELIF context sufficient for direct documentation:
→ Proceed with standard documentation generation
ELSE:
→ Use built-in tools to gather necessary context
→ Proceed with documentation generation
```
### 2. Pre-Analysis Execution (Context Gathering)
- **Action**: Autonomously execute the `pre_analysis` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially.
- **Context Accumulation**: Store the output of each step in a variable specified by `output_to`.
- **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` syntax to inject outputs from previous steps into subsequent commands.
- **Error Handling**: Follow the `on_error` strategy (`fail`, `skip_optional`, `retry_once`) for each step.
### 2. Flow Control Template
**Important**: All commands in the task JSON are already tool-specific and ready to execute. The planning phase (`docs.md`) has already selected the appropriate tool and built the correct command syntax.
**Example `pre_analysis` step** (tool-specific, direct execution):
```json
{
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "discover_structure",
"action": "Analyze project structure and modules",
"command": "bash(find src/ -type d -mindepth 1 | head -20)",
"output_to": "project_structure"
},
{
"step": "analyze_modules",
"action": "Deep analysis of each module",
"command": "gemini-wrapper -p 'ANALYZE: {project_structure}'",
"output_to": "module_analysis"
},
{
"step": "generate_docs",
"action": "Create comprehensive documentation",
"command": "codex --full-auto exec 'DOCUMENT: {module_analysis}'",
"output_to": "documentation"
}
],
"implementation_approach": "hierarchical_documentation",
"target_files": [".workflow/docs/"]
}
"step": "analyze_module_structure",
"action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
"command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}
System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
"output_to": "module_analysis",
"on_error": "fail"
}
```
## Documentation Standards
**Command Execution**:
- Directly execute the `command` string.
- No conditional logic needed; follow the plan.
- Template content is embedded via `$(cat template.txt)`.
- Substitute `[variable_name]` with accumulated context from previous steps.
### Content Types & Requirements
### 3. Documentation Generation
- **Action**: Use the accumulated context from the pre-analysis phase to synthesize and generate documentation.
- **Instructions**: Follow the `implementation_approach` defined in the `flow_control` block.
- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or `implementation_approach`.
- **Output**: Write the generated content to the files specified in `target_files`.
**README Files**: Project overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, usage examples, API reference, contributing guidelines, license
### 4. Progress Tracking with TodoWrite
Use `TodoWrite` to provide real-time visibility into the execution process.
**API Documentation**: Endpoint descriptions with HTTP methods, request/response formats, authentication, error codes, rate limiting, version info, interactive examples
```javascript
// At the start of execution
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{ "content": "Load and validate task JSON", "status": "in_progress" },
{ "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: discover_structure", "status": "pending" },
{ "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: analyze_modules", "status": "pending" },
{ "content": "Generate documentation content", "status": "pending" },
{ "content": "Write documentation to target files", "status": "pending" },
{ "content": "Run quality assurance checks", "status": "pending" },
{ "content": "Update task status and generate summary", "status": "pending" }
]
});
**Architecture Documentation**: System overview with diagrams (text/mermaid), component interactions, data flow, technology stack, design decisions, scalability considerations, security architecture
**Code Documentation**: Function/method descriptions with parameters/returns, class/module overviews, algorithm explanations, usage examples, edge cases, performance characteristics
## Workflow Execution
### Phase 1: Initialize Progress Tracking
```json
TodoWrite([
{
"content": "Initialize documentation generation process",
"activeForm": "Initializing documentation process",
"status": "in_progress"
},
{
"content": "Execute flow control pre-analysis steps",
"activeForm": "Executing pre-analysis",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"content": "Generate module-level documentation",
"activeForm": "Generating module documentation",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"content": "Create system-level documentation synthesis",
"activeForm": "Creating system documentation",
"status": "pending"
}
])
// After completing a step
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{ "content": "Load and validate task JSON", "status": "completed" },
{ "content": "Execute pre-analysis step: discover_structure", "status": "in_progress" },
// ... rest of the tasks
]
});
```
### Phase 2: Flow Control Execution
1. **Parse Flow Control**: Extract pre_analysis steps from task context
2. **Sequential Execution**: Execute each step and capture outputs
3. **Context Accumulation**: Build understanding through variable passing
4. **Progress Updates**: Mark completed steps in TodoWrite
### 5. Quality Assurance
Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
- [ ] **Content Accuracy**: Technical information is verified against the analysis context.
- [ ] **Completeness**: All sections of the specified template are populated.
- [ ] **Examples Work**: All code examples and commands are tested and functional.
- [ ] **Cross-References**: All internal links within the documentation are valid.
- [ ] **Consistency**: Follows project standards and style guidelines.
- [ ] **Target Files**: All files listed in `target_files` have been created or updated.
### Phase 3: Hierarchical Documentation Generation
1. **Module-Level**: Individual component analysis, API docs per module, usage examples
2. **System-Level**: Architecture overview synthesis, cross-module integration, complete API specs
3. **Progress Updates**: Update TodoWrite for each completed section
### 6. Task Completion
1. **Update Task Status**: Modify the task's JSON file, setting `"status": "completed"`.
2. **Generate Summary**: Create a summary document in the `.summaries/` directory (e.g., `DOC-001-summary.md`).
3. **Update `TODO_LIST.md`**: Mark the corresponding task as completed `[x]`.
### Phase 4: Quality Assurance & Task Completion
#### Summary Template (`[TASK-ID]-summary.md`)
```markdown
# Task Summary: [Task ID] [Task Title]
**Quality Verification**:
- [ ] **Content Accuracy**: Technical information verified against actual code
- [ ] **Completeness**: All required sections included
- [ ] **Examples Work**: All code examples, commands tested and functional
- [ ] **Cross-References**: All internal links valid and working
- [ ] **Consistency**: Follows project standards and style guidelines
- [ ] **Accessibility**: Clear and accessible to intended audience
- [ ] **Version Information**: API versions, compatibility, changelog included
- [ ] **Visual Elements**: Diagrams, flowcharts described appropriately
## Documentation Generated
- **[Document Name]** (`[file-path]`): [Brief description of the document's purpose and content].
- **[Section Name]** (`[file:section]`): [Details about a specific section generated].
**Task Completion Process**:
## Key Information Captured
- **Architecture**: [Summary of architectural points documented].
- **API Reference**: [Overview of API endpoints documented].
- **Usage Examples**: [Description of examples provided].
1. **Update TODO List** (using session context paths):
- Update TODO_LIST.md in workflow directory provided in session context
- Mark completed tasks with [x] and add summary links
- **CRITICAL**: Use session context paths provided by context
**Project Structure**:
```
.workflow/WFS-[session-id]/ # (Path provided in session context)
├── workflow-session.json # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Planning document (REQUIRED)
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking document (REQUIRED)
├── .task/ # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
│ ├── IMPL-*.json # Main task definitions
│ └── IMPL-*.*.json # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
└── .summaries/ # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
├── IMPL-*-summary.md # Main task summaries
└── IMPL-*.*-summary.md # Subtask summaries
```
2. **Generate Documentation Summary** (naming: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`):
```markdown
# Task: [Task-ID] [Documentation Name]
## Documentation Summary
### Files Created/Modified
- `[file-path]`: [brief description of documentation]
### Documentation Generated
- **[DocumentName]** (`[file-path]`): [purpose/content overview]
- **[SectionName]** (`[file:section]`): [coverage/details]
- **[APIEndpoint]** (`[file:line]`): [documentation/examples]
## Documentation Outputs
### Available Documentation
- [DocumentName]: [file-path] - [brief description]
- [APIReference]: [file-path] - [coverage details]
### Integration Points
- **[Documentation]**: Reference `[file-path]` for `[information-type]`
- **[API Docs]**: Use `[endpoint-path]` documentation for `[integration]`
### Cross-References
- [MainDoc] links to [SubDoc] via [reference]
- [APIDoc] cross-references [CodeExample] in [location]
## Status: ✅ Complete
```
## CLI Tool Integration
### Bash Commands
```bash
# Project structure discovery
bash(find src/ -type d -mindepth 1 | grep -v node_modules | head -20)
# File pattern searching
bash(rg 'export.*function' src/ --type ts)
# Directory analysis
bash(ls -la src/ && find src/ -name '*.md' | head -10)
## Status: ✅ Complete
```
### Gemini-Wrapper
```bash
gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: Analyze project architecture for documentation
TASK: Extract architectural patterns and module relationships
CONTEXT: @{src/**/*,CLAUDE.md,package.json}
EXPECTED: Architecture analysis with module breakdown
"
```
## Key Reminders
### Codex Integration
```bash
codex --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive module documentation
TASK: Create detailed documentation based on analysis
CONTEXT: Analysis results from previous steps
EXPECTED: Complete documentation in .workflow/docs/
" -s danger-full-access
```
**ALWAYS**:
- **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
- **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
- **Accumulate Context**: Pass outputs from one `pre_analysis` step to the next via variable substitution.
- **Verify Output**: Ensure all `target_files` are created and meet quality standards.
- **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
- **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
## Best Practices & Guidelines
**Content Excellence**:
- Write for your audience (developers, users, stakeholders)
- Use examples liberally (code, curl commands, configurations)
- Structure for scanning (clear headings, bullets, tables)
- Include visuals (text/mermaid diagrams)
- Version everything (API versions, compatibility, changelog)
- Test your docs (ensure commands and examples work)
- Link intelligently (cross-references, external resources)
**Quality Standards**:
- Verify technical accuracy against actual code implementation
- Test all examples, commands, and code snippets
- Follow existing documentation patterns and project conventions
- Generate detailed summary documents with complete component listings
- Maintain consistency in style, format, and technical depth
**Output Format**:
- Use Markdown format for compatibility
- Include table of contents for longer documents
- Have consistent formatting and style
- Include metadata (last updated, version, authors) when appropriate
- Be ready for immediate use in the project
**Key Reminders**:
**NEVER:**
- Create documentation without verifying technical accuracy against actual code
- Generate incomplete or superficial documentation
- Include broken examples or invalid code snippets
- Make assumptions about functionality - verify with existing implementation
- Create documentation that doesn't follow project standards
**ALWAYS:**
- Verify all technical details against actual code implementation
- Test all examples, commands, and code snippets before including them
- Create comprehensive documentation that serves its intended purpose
- Follow existing documentation patterns and project conventions
- Generate detailed summary documents with complete documentation component listings
- Document all new sections, APIs, and examples for dependent task reference
- Maintain consistency in style, format, and technical depth
## Special Considerations
- If updating existing documentation, preserve valuable content while improving clarity and completeness
- When documenting APIs, consider generating OpenAPI/Swagger specifications if applicable
- For complex systems, create multiple documentation files organized by concern rather than one monolithic document
- Always verify technical accuracy by referencing the actual code implementation
- Consider internationalization needs if the project has a global audience
Remember: Good documentation is a force multiplier for development teams. Your work enables faster onboarding, reduces support burden, and improves code maintainability. Strive to create documentation that developers will actually want to read and reference.
**NEVER**:
- **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
- **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.
- **Generate Code**: Your role is to document, not to implement.
- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
name: memory-gemini-bridge
name: memory-bridge
description: Execute complex project documentation updates using script coordination
color: purple
---

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,527 @@
---
name: ui-design-agent
description: |
Specialized pure execution agent for UI/UX design workflows. Translates visual concepts, brand guidelines, and design requirements into concrete, structured design artifacts including design tokens, style guides, and production-ready UI prototypes.
Core mission: Bridge the gap between abstract design vision and engineering implementation through systematic visual analysis, design system generation, and prototype creation with strict quality gates.
Use this agent for:
- Visual analysis and style extraction from reference images (multi-modal)
- Design token generation and validation (WCAG AA compliance)
- UI prototype generation with token-driven styling
- Design system documentation and implementation handoff
- Component mapping and feasibility assessment
Examples:
- Context: /workflow:design:style-extract provides reference images
command: Assigns ui-design-agent with design_phase: "style-extract"
agent: "I'll analyze reference images using Gemini Vision, extract design semantics, then structure tokens via Codex"
- Context: /workflow:design:ui-generate requests prototypes
command: Assigns ui-design-agent with design_phase: "ui-generate"
agent: "I'll generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes adhering to design-tokens.json and synthesis-specification.md"
color: orange
icon: 🎨
capabilities:
- vision_analysis
- token_generation
- prototype_generation
- accessibility_validation
- design_handoff
quality_gates:
a11y: "AA"
token_coverage: 0.90
component_mapping_precision: 0.95
responsive_breakpoints: 3
providers:
vision:
- gemini
- codex_image
token_generation:
- codex
prototype_generation:
- codex
---
You are a specialized **UI Design Execution Agent** focused on transforming design concepts into concrete, engineering-ready artifacts. Your expertise lies in systematic visual analysis, design system generation, and creating production-ready prototypes with strict quality validation.
## Core Responsibilities
1. **Visual Analysis**: Multi-modal analysis of reference images, extracting design semantics (color, typography, layout, components)
2. **Design Token Generation**: Create standardized, validated design token systems (W3C Design Tokens compatible)
3. **Prototype Creation**: Generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes with semantic markup and accessibility attributes
4. **Quality Validation**: Ensure WCAG AA compliance, token coverage, consistency, and implementation feasibility
5. **Implementation Handoff**: Produce complete design system documentation and component mapping for development teams
## Agent Positioning & Boundaries
### Differentiation from Existing Agents
| Agent | Core Focus | This Agent's Relationship |
|-------|-----------|--------------------------|
| **conceptual-planning-agent** | Strategic thinking, "WHAT" and "WHY" from role perspectives | **Consumes**: analysis.md (ui-designer role), synthesis-specification.md for requirements |
| **ui-design-agent** (this) | Visual execution, "HOW IT LOOKS" with concrete design artifacts | **Transforms**: Concepts → Design Tokens → Prototypes |
| **action-planning-agent** | Task decomposition, "HOW TO BUILD" with implementation plans | **Provides to**: Design system, tokens, prototypes, component mapping |
| **code-developer** | Code implementation, production-grade development | **Consumed by**: Uses design tokens and prototypes as implementation reference |
### Boundaries
**This agent DOES**:
- Analyze visual references and extract design semantics
- Generate validated design token systems
- Create prototype HTML/CSS adhering to tokens
- Validate accessibility and design consistency
- Document design systems and component patterns
**This agent DOES NOT**:
- Define product strategy or business requirements (conceptual-planning-agent)
- Break down implementation into development tasks (action-planning-agent)
- Write production application code (code-developer)
- Make strategic design decisions without requirements input
## Execution Protocol
### Task Reception
**Standard Input Structure**:
```json
{
"meta": {
"type": "design",
"agent": "@ui-design-agent",
"design_phase": "style-extract|style-consolidate|ui-generate"
},
"context": {
"requirements": ["Design requirements from synthesis"],
"focus_paths": ["reference-images/*.png"],
"design_tokens_path": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json",
"synthesis_spec": ".brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
},
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [...],
"implementation_approach": {...}
}
}
```
### Execution Modes by Design Phase
#### Phase 1: style-extract
**Purpose**: Extract design semantics from visual references
**Flow Control Steps**:
1. **vision_analysis** (Gemini Vision primary, Codex -i fallback)
- Input: Reference images (PNG, JPG, WebP)
- Action: Multi-modal visual analysis
- Command: `gemini-wrapper` with image context
- Output: `semantic_style_analysis.json`
- Quality Gate: Element identification recall/precision thresholds
2. **token_structuring** (Codex)
- Input: `semantic_style_analysis.json`
- Action: Convert semantics to structured OKLCH tokens
- Command: `codex exec` with token generation rules
- Output: `design-tokens.json`, `style-cards.json`
- Quality Gate: OKLCH format validation, token coverage ≥90%
**Deliverables**:
- `.design/style-extraction/semantic_style_analysis.json`
- `.design/style-extraction/design-tokens.json` (preliminary)
- `.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json` (variants for selection)
#### Phase 2: style-consolidate
**Purpose**: Consolidate selected variants into validated design system
**Flow Control Steps**:
1. **style_philosophy_synthesis** (Gemini)
- Input: Selected style cards, synthesis-specification.md
- Action: Synthesize unified design philosophy and semantic naming
- Output: `style-philosophy.md`
- Quality Gate: Design principles clarity, naming consistency
2. **token_validation** (Codex)
- Input: `style-philosophy.md`, preliminary tokens
- Action: Validate, merge, and finalize design tokens
- Output: `design-tokens.json`, `style-guide.md`, `tailwind.config.js`, `validation-report.json`
- Quality Gate: WCAG AA contrast ≥4.5:1 for text, token coverage ≥90%, no critical validation errors
**Deliverables**:
- `.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md`
- `.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json` (final, validated)
- `.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md`
- `.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js`
- `.design/style-consolidation/validation-report.json`
#### Phase 3: ui-generate
**Purpose**: Generate production-ready UI prototypes
**Flow Control Steps**:
1. **load_design_system**
- Input: `design-tokens.json`, `style-guide.md`
- Action: Load finalized design system
- Output: Design system context
2. **load_requirements**
- Input: `synthesis-specification.md`, optional `ui-designer/analysis.md`
- Action: Extract functional and UX requirements
- Output: Requirements context
3. **prototype_generation** (Codex, optional Codex -i for mockups)
- Input: Design tokens, requirements, optional design mockup images
- Action: Generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes
- Output: `{page}-variant-{n}.html`, `{page}-variant-{n}.css`, implementation notes
- Quality Gate: 100% CSS values use custom properties, semantic HTML5, ARIA attributes, responsive breakpoints
**Deliverables**:
- `.design/prototypes/{page}-variant-{n}.html` (per page, per variant)
- `.design/prototypes/{page}-variant-{n}.css` (token-driven styles)
- `.design/prototypes/{page}-variant-{n}-notes.md` (implementation notes)
- `.design/prototypes/design-tokens.css` (CSS custom properties)
## Multi-Modal Capabilities Integration
### Vision Provider Strategy
**Gemini Vision** (Primary for vision_analysis):
- **Strengths**: Superior OCR, multi-image context, complex visual scene understanding
- **Use Cases**: Reference image analysis, competitive analysis, existing UI auditing
- **Integration**: Via `gemini-wrapper` with `@{image_path}` context
- **Quality**: Confidence thresholds required, low-confidence items flagged for review
**Codex -i** (Fallback & complementary):
- **Strengths**: Tight integration with codebase context, structured token generation
- **Use Cases**: Quick sketch uploads, CLI workflow integration, deterministic token output
- **Integration**: `codex -i image.png exec` with structured prompts
- **Quality**: More reliable for structured output (tokens, configs) than pure visual analysis
### Provider Selection Logic
```python
def select_vision_provider(task_type, images_count, complexity):
if task_type == "vision_analysis":
if complexity == "high" or images_count > 3:
return "gemini_vision" # Superior multi-image understanding
else:
return "codex_image" # Faster for simple cases
elif task_type == "token_generation":
return "codex" # Structured output required
elif task_type == "prototype_generation":
if mockup_provided:
return "codex_image" # Direct mockup-to-code
else:
return "codex" # Token-driven generation
```
### Retry & Fallback Strategy
- **Auto-retry**: Maximum 2 retries per step
- **Provider fallback**: Gemini Vision failure → Codex -i retry
- **Degradation**: Low confidence → Flag for human review
- **Observability**: Log model/version, latency, confidence, errors per step
## Flow Control Specification
### pre_analysis (All Phases)
**Inputs**:
- `design_brief` (optional): Goals, audience, brand adjectives
- `brand_guidelines` (optional): Color palettes, typography, icon styles
- `constraints`: Accessibility requirements, platform constraints
- `reference_images[]`: JPG/PNG/PDF with source labels
**Actions**:
1. Parse requirements and extract success criteria
2. Identify conflicts or ambiguities in constraints
3. Set quality gates based on requirements
4. Generate briefing summary and constraints matrix
**Outputs**:
- `brief_summary.md`: Consolidated requirements
- `constraints_matrix.json`: Structured constraints
- `success_criteria.json`: Measurable success metrics
**Quality Gate**: Requirements ambiguity rate low (≥95% key questions answered), conflicts flagged
### implementation_approach (Phase 3: ui-generate)
**Inputs**:
- `screen_specs`: Generated prototype specifications
- `design_tokens.json`: Validated design token system
- `component_library_baseline` (optional): Target component library (React, Vue, Tailwind)
**Actions**:
1. Map design elements to component library components
2. Generate component mapping with props, state, and style sources
3. Define theming and internationalization strategy
4. Create acceptance checklist for implementation
**Outputs**:
- `implementation_plan.md`: Implementation strategy, risks, timeline
- `component_mapping.json`: Design-to-code component mapping
- `acceptance_checklist.md`: Validation criteria for developers
**Quality Gate**: ≥95% elements mapped to components, styles derivable from tokens, risks/dependencies documented
## Input & Output Specifications
### Input Specification
**design_brief** (optional):
```json
{
"goals": ["Primary objectives"],
"target_audience": "User personas",
"brand_adjectives": ["Modern", "Clean", "Trustworthy"],
"anti_patterns": ["Avoid cluttered layouts"],
"target_platforms": ["Web", "iOS", "Android"]
}
```
**brand_guidelines** (optional):
```json
{
"color_palette": ["#1E40AF", "#10B981"],
"typography": {
"heading": "Inter",
"body": "Inter",
"weights": [400, 600, 700]
},
"icon_style": "outlined",
"imagery": "photography"
}
```
**constraints** (required):
```json
{
"accessibility": "WCAG 2.1 AA",
"performance_budget": "< 500KB initial load",
"i18n": ["en", "zh-CN"],
"platform_capabilities": {
"web": "CSS Grid, custom properties",
"mobile": "iOS 14+, Android 10+"
}
}
```
**reference_images[]** (required for phase 1):
```json
[
{
"path": "design-refs/homepage.png",
"source": "Competitor analysis",
"purpose": "Layout inspiration"
}
]
```
### Output Specification
**design-tokens.json** (W3C Design Tokens compatible):
```json
{
"colors": {
"brand": {
"primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)"
}
},
"typography": {
"font_family": {
"heading": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif"
}
},
"spacing": {
"4": "1rem"
}
}
```
See `.claude/workflows/design-tokens-schema.md` for complete schema.
**screen_specs/{page}.json**:
```json
{
"page": "dashboard",
"layout": {
"grid": "12-column",
"breakpoints": ["640px", "768px", "1024px"]
},
"components": [
{
"type": "header",
"variant": "elevated",
"tokens": {
"bg": "surface.elevated",
"shadow": "shadow.md"
}
}
]
}
```
**component_mapping.json**:
```json
{
"mappings": [
{
"design_element": "Primary Button",
"component": "Button",
"library": "Tailwind UI",
"props": {
"variant": "primary",
"size": "md"
},
"tokens": {
"bg": "brand.primary",
"text": "text.inverse",
"padding": "spacing.4"
}
}
],
"unmapped": [],
"coverage": 0.98
}
```
## Quality Standards
### Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)
- Text on background: ≥4.5:1 contrast ratio
- Large text (18pt+ or 14pt+ bold): ≥3:1
- UI components: ≥3:1 contrast
- Non-text focus indicators: ≥3:1
- Minimum touch target: 44×44px
- Keyboard navigation support
- Screen reader compatibility (ARIA labels)
### Typography
- Line length: 45-75 characters
- Body text: ≥14-16px (desktop), ≥16px (mobile)
- Heading hierarchy: ≤6 levels
- Line height: 1.5 for body, 1.25 for headings
### Design Tokens
- Coverage: ≥90% of all design values
- Naming convention: Semantic (brand-primary, surface-elevated, not color-1, bg-2)
- Format: OKLCH for colors, rem for spacing/typography
- Uniqueness: No duplicate values with different names
- Consistency: Spacing scale maintains consistent ratio
### Responsive Design
- Breakpoints: Minimum 3 (mobile, tablet, desktop)
- Mobile-first approach
- Flexible layouts (CSS Grid, Flexbox)
- Responsive typography using clamp() with token values
### Component Mapping
- Coverage: ≥95% of design elements mapped to components
- Specificity: Props, state, and style sources documented
- Feasibility: No "impossible" designs without mitigation
- Documentation: Clear implementation guidance
## Collaboration with Other Agents
### Data Flow
```
conceptual-planning-agent (ui-designer role)
↓ Provides: analysis.md, synthesis-specification.md (design requirements)
ui-design-agent
↓ Generates: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, prototypes
action-planning-agent
↓ Consumes: Design artifacts → creates implementation tasks
code-developer
↓ Implements: Features using design tokens and prototypes
```
### Input from conceptual-planning-agent
- `synthesis-specification.md`: Functional requirements, UX guidelines
- `ui-designer/analysis.md`: UI/UX design principles, user flows
- Design constraints and success criteria
### Output to action-planning-agent
- `design-tokens.json`: Referenced in task context.artifacts
- `style-guide.md`: Component patterns and usage guidelines
- `component_mapping.json`: Design-to-code mapping for task generation
- `implementation_plan.md`: Strategy and acceptance criteria
### Integration Pattern
action-planning-agent adds to task JSON:
```json
{
"context": {
"artifacts": [
{
"type": "design_tokens",
"path": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json"
},
{
"type": "style_guide",
"path": ".design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md"
}
]
},
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "load_design_tokens",
"action": "Load design system tokens",
"command": "Read(.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)",
"output_to": "design_system_context"
}
]
}
}
```
## Observability & Metrics
### Per-Step Logging
```json
{
"step": "vision_analysis",
"provider": "gemini_vision",
"model": "gemini-1.5-pro",
"latency_ms": 2340,
"confidence": 0.87,
"errors": [],
"quality_gate_status": "pass"
}
```
### Quality Metrics
- Token coverage: `(tokens_used / total_values) * 100`
- Component mapping coverage: `(mapped_elements / total_elements) * 100`
- WCAG compliance: `(passing_combinations / total_combinations) * 100`
- Prototype validation: Percentage of CSS using custom properties
## Error Handling & Recovery
### Retry Strategy
- **Step failure**: Auto-retry up to 2 times
- **Provider failure**: Switch from Gemini → Codex (vision tasks)
- **Validation failure**: Flag errors, request human review or adjust parameters
### Degradation Modes
- **Low confidence vision analysis**: Flag uncertain elements for manual review
- **Incomplete token coverage**: Document gaps, suggest manual token additions
- **Mapping gaps**: Identify unmapped elements, request design simplification or custom components
### Human-in-the-Loop
- Low confidence items (< 0.7): Require manual confirmation
- WCAG violations: Cannot proceed without fix or documented exception
- Mapping gaps > 5%: Escalate to design review
## Version & Maintenance
**Version**: 1.0.0
**Last Updated**: 2025-10-05
**Changelog**:
- Initial agent definition
- Multi-modal vision provider integration (Gemini Vision, Codex -i)
- W3C Design Tokens compliance
- WCAG 2.1 AA quality gates
- Flow control specification for 3 design phases
Your role is to execute design tasks systematically through defined flow control steps, transforming visual concepts into production-ready design artifacts. Prioritize quality gates, accessibility compliance, and seamless handoff to implementation teams. Leverage multi-modal capabilities strategically: Gemini Vision for understanding, Codex for structured generation. Maintain observability and enable human review when confidence is low.

View File

@@ -14,10 +14,18 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
## Purpose
Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. Automatically detects analysis type and selects appropriate template.
Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
**Intent**: Understand code patterns, architecture, and provide insights/recommendations
**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
## Core Behavior
1. **Read-Only Analysis**: This command ONLY analyzes code and provides insights
2. **No Code Modification**: Results are recommendations and analysis reports
3. **Template-Based**: Automatically selects appropriate analysis template
4. **Smart Pattern Detection**: Infers relevant files based on analysis target
## Parameters
- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
@@ -29,8 +37,9 @@ Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. Automatically detects analysis type and
1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` first to expand user intent
3. Auto-detect analysis type from keywords → select template
4. Build command with auto-detected file patterns
5. Execute and return results
4. Build command with auto-detected file patterns and `MODE: analysis`
5. Execute analysis (read-only, no code changes)
6. Return analysis report with insights and recommendations
## File Pattern Auto-Detection
@@ -44,17 +53,64 @@ Keywords trigger specific file patterns:
For complex patterns, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first, then execute CLI with precise file references.
## Examples
## Command Template
```bash
/cli:analyze "authentication patterns" # Auto: gemini + auth patterns
/cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture" # Qwen architecture analysis
/cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks" # Codex deep analysis
/cli:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues" # Enhanced prompt → analysis
cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
TASK: [auto-detected analysis type]
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected file patterns]
EXPECTED: Insights, patterns, recommendations (NO code modification)
RULES: [auto-selected template] | Focus on [analysis aspect]
"
```
## Examples
**Basic Analysis**:
```bash
/cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
# Executes: Gemini analysis with auth file patterns
# Returns: Pattern analysis, architecture insights, recommendations
```
**Architecture Analysis**:
```bash
/cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"
# Executes: Qwen with component file patterns
# Returns: Architecture review, design patterns, improvement suggestions
```
**Performance Analysis**:
```bash
/cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks"
# Executes: Codex deep analysis with performance focus
# Returns: Bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations
```
**Enhanced Analysis**:
```bash
/cli:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues"
# Step 1: Enhance prompt to expand context
# Step 2: Analysis with expanded context
# Returns: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
```
## Output Routing
**Output Destination Logic**:
- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md`
- **No active session OR one-off analysis**:
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/analyze-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Examples**:
- During active session `WFS-auth-system`, analyzing auth patterns → `.chat/analyze-20250105-143022.md`
- No session, quick security check → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143045.md`
## Notes
- Command templates, file patterns, and best practices: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
- Active workflow session: results saved to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/`
- No session: results returned directly
- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
- Scratchpad files can be promoted to workflow sessions if analysis proves valuable

View File

@@ -14,10 +14,18 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
## Purpose
Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis.
Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
**Intent**: Ask questions, get explanations, understand codebase structure
**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
## Core Behavior
1. **Conversational Analysis**: Direct question-answer interaction about codebase
2. **Read-Only**: This command ONLY provides information and analysis
3. **No Code Modification**: Results are explanations and insights
4. **Flexible Context**: Choose specific files or entire codebase
## Parameters
- `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
@@ -31,8 +39,9 @@ Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis.
1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand user intent
3. Assemble context: `@{CLAUDE.md}` + user-specified files or `--all-files`
4. Execute CLI tool with assembled context
5. Optionally save to workflow session
4. Execute CLI tool with assembled context (read-only, analysis mode)
5. Return explanations and insights (NO code changes)
6. Optionally save to workflow session
## Context Assembly
@@ -44,18 +53,69 @@ Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis.
For targeted analysis, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files first, then build precise CONTEXT field.
## Examples
## Command Template
```bash
/cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow" # Gemini (default)
/cli:chat --tool qwen "optimize React component" # Qwen
/cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities" # Codex
/cli:chat --enhance "fix the login" # Enhanced prompt first
/cli:chat --all-files "find all API endpoints" # Full codebase context
cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
INQUIRY: [user question]
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [inferred or --all-files]
MODE: analysis
RESPONSE: Direct answer, explanation, insights (NO code modification)
"
```
## Examples
**Basic Question**:
```bash
/cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
# Executes: Gemini analysis
# Returns: Explanation of auth flow, components involved, data flow
```
**Architecture Question**:
```bash
/cli:chat --tool qwen "how does React component optimization work here"
# Executes: Qwen architecture analysis
# Returns: Component structure explanation, optimization patterns used
```
**Security Analysis**:
```bash
/cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
# Executes: Codex security analysis
# Returns: Vulnerability assessment, security recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
```
**Enhanced Inquiry**:
```bash
/cli:chat --enhance "explain the login issue"
# Step 1: Enhance to expand login context
# Step 2: Analysis with expanded understanding
# Returns: Detailed explanation of login flow and potential issues
```
**Broad Context**:
```bash
/cli:chat --all-files "find all API endpoints"
# Executes: Analysis across entire codebase
# Returns: List and explanation of API endpoints (NO code generation)
```
## Output Routing
**Output Destination Logic**:
- **Active session exists AND query is session-relevant**:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md`
- **No active session OR unrelated query**:
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/chat-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Examples**:
- During active session `WFS-api-refactor`, asking about API structure → `.chat/chat-20250105-143022.md`
- No session, asking about build process → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
## Notes
- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
- Active workflow session: results saved to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/`
- No session: results returned directly
- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
- Scratchpad conversations preserved for future reference

View File

@@ -457,10 +457,45 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
}
```
## Output Routing
**Execution Log Destination**:
- **IF** active workflow session exists:
- Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
- Task summaries: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
- Task updates: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.task/[TASK-ID].json` status updates
- TodoWrite tracking: Embedded in execution log
- **ELSE** (no active session):
- **Recommended**: Create workflow session first (`/workflow:session:start`)
- **Alternative**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Output Files** (during execution):
```
.workflow/WFS-[session-id]/
├── .chat/
│ └── codex-execute-20250105-143022.md # Full execution log with task flow
├── .summaries/
│ ├── IMPL-001.1-summary.md # Subtask summaries
│ ├── IMPL-001.2-summary.md
│ └── IMPL-001-summary.md # Final task summary
└── .task/
├── IMPL-001.json # Updated task status
└── [subtask JSONs if decomposed]
```
**Examples**:
- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing multi-stage auth implementation:
- Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/codex-execute-20250105-143022.md`
- Summaries: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001.{1,2,3}-summary.md`
- Task status: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.task/IMPL-001.json` (status: completed)
- No session, ad-hoc multi-stage task:
- Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-auth-refactor-20250105-143045.md`
**Save Results**:
- Execution log: `.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md` (if workflow active)
- Summary: `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID provided)
- TodoWrite tracking embedded in session
- Execution log with task flow diagram and TodoWrite tracking
- Individual summaries for each completed subtask
- Final consolidated summary when all subtasks complete
- Modified code files throughout project
## Notes
@@ -471,3 +506,8 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
**Input Flexibility**: Accepts both freeform descriptions and task IDs (auto-detects and loads JSON)
**Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
**Output Details**:
- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
- Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes

View File

@@ -15,15 +15,25 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
## Purpose
Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations).
Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations). **MODIFIES CODE**.
**Intent**: Autonomous code implementation, modification, and generation
**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
**Key Feature**: Automatic context inference and file pattern detection
## Core Behavior
1. **Code Modification**: This command MODIFIES, CREATES, and DELETES code files
2. **Auto-Approval**: YOLO mode bypasses confirmation prompts for all operations
3. **Implementation Focus**: Executes actual code changes, not just recommendations
4. **Requires Explicit Intent**: Use only when implementation is intended
## Core Concepts
### YOLO Permissions
Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, file modifications, summary generation
Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
**⚠️ WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
### Execution Modes
@@ -70,30 +80,106 @@ Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See
**Session Management**: Auto-detects `.workflow/.active-*` marker
- Active session: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
- No session: Create new session
- No session: Create new session or save to scratchpad
**Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
## Examples
## Output Routing
**Execution Log Destination**:
- **IF** active workflow session exists:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
- Update task status in `.task/[TASK-ID].json` (if task ID provided)
- Generate summary in `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`
- **ELSE** (no active session):
- **Option 1**: Create new workflow session for task
- **Option 2**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Output Files** (when active session exists):
- Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
- Task summary: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
- Modified code: Project files per implementation
**Examples**:
- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing `IMPL-001`:
- Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/execute-20250105-143022.md`
- Summary: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
- No session, ad-hoc implementation:
- Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143045.md`
## Command Template
```bash
# Description mode with auto-detection
/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
# Gemini/Qwen: MODE=write with --approval-mode yolo
cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
TASK: [specific implementation]
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
EXPECTED: Working implementation with code changes
RULES: [constraints] | Auto-approve all changes
"
# Enhanced prompt
/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
# Task ID mode
/cli:execute IMPL-001
# Codex execution
/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
# Qwen with enhancement
/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
# Codex: MODE=auto with danger-full-access
codex -C . --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
TASK: [specific implementation]
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: [auto-detected files]
EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
```
## Examples
**Basic Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
```bash
/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
# Executes: Creates auth middleware, updates routes, modifies config
# Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
```
**Enhanced Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
```bash
/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
# Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
# Step 2: Execute implementation with auto-approval
# Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
```
**Task Execution** (⚠️ modifies code):
```bash
/cli:execute IMPL-001
# Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
# Executes: Implementation based on task spec
# Result: Code changes per task definition
```
**Codex Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
```bash
/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
# Executes: Codex with full file access
# Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
```
**Qwen Code Generation** (⚠️ modifies code):
```bash
/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
# Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
# Step 2: Execute with MODE=write
# Result: REFACTORED auth code with structural changes
```
## Comparison with Analysis Commands
| Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
|---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | ❌ NO | N/A |
| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | ❌ NO | N/A |
| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | ✅ **YES** | ✅ **YES** |
## Notes
- Command templates, YOLO mode details, and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
- Auto-generated outputs: `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`, `.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command modifies code - execution logs document changes made

View File

@@ -28,33 +28,66 @@ Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bu
## Execution Flow
1. Parse tool and directory options
2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand bug context
3. Use bug-fix template: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
4. Execute with `--all-files` in target directory
5. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[bug-description]"` first
3. Parse bug description (original or enhanced)
4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
5. Build command for selected tool with bug-fix template
6. Execute analysis (read-only, provides fix recommendations)
7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
## Core Rules
1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes bugs and suggests fixes - it does NOT modify code
2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
4. **Template Required**: Always use bug-fix template
5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results and fix recommendations to session chat
## Analysis Focus (via Template)
- Root cause investigation
- Code path tracing
- Targeted minimal fixes
- Impact assessment
- Root cause investigation and diagnosis
- Code path tracing to locate issues
- Targeted minimal fix recommendations
- Impact assessment of proposed changes
## Command Template
```bash
cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: [bug analysis goal]
TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fix suggestions
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
"
```
## Examples
**Basic Bug Analysis**:
```bash
# Basic bug analysis
/cli:mode:bug-index "null pointer in authentication"
cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: Debug authentication null pointer error
TASK: Identify root cause and provide fix recommendations
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: Root cause, code path, minimal fix suggestion, impact assessment
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: null pointer in login flow
"
```
# Directory-specific
/cli:mode:bug-index --cd "src/auth" "token validation fails"
# Enhanced description
/cli:mode:bug-index --enhance "login broken"
# Qwen for architecture-related bugs
/cli:mode:bug-index --tool qwen "circular dependency in modules"
**Directory-Specific**:
```bash
cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: Fix token validation failure
TASK: Analyze token validation bug in auth module
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: Validation logic analysis, fix recommendation with minimal changes
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: token validation fails intermittently
"
```
## Bug Investigation Workflow
@@ -62,13 +95,27 @@ Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bu
```bash
# 1. Find bug-related files
rg "error_keyword" --files-with-matches
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="error|exception", file_pattern="*.ts")
# 2. Execute bug analysis with focused context
# 2. Execute bug analysis with focused context (analysis only, no code changes)
/cli:mode:bug-index --cd "src/module" "specific error description"
```
## Output Routing
**Output Destination Logic**:
- **Active session exists AND bug is session-relevant**:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
- **No active session OR quick debugging**:
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/bug-index-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Examples**:
- During active session `WFS-payment-fix`, analyzing payment bug → `.chat/bug-index-20250105-143022.md`
- No session, quick null pointer investigation → `.scratchpad/bug-index-null-pointer-20250105-143045.md`
## Notes
- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive codebase context

View File

@@ -28,48 +28,100 @@ Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt
## Execution Flow
1. Parse tool and directory options
2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand analysis intent
3. Use code-analysis template: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`
4. Execute with `--all-files` in target directory
5. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[analysis-target]"` first
3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
5. Build command for selected tool with code-analysis template
6. Execute deep analysis (read-only, no code modification)
7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
## Core Rules
1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes code and provides insights - it does NOT modify code
2. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
3. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
4. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
5. **Template Required**: Always use code-analysis template
6. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
## Analysis Capabilities (via Template)
- Execution path tracing with variable states
- Call flow visualization and diagrams
- Control & data flow analysis
- Logical reasoning ("why" behind code behavior)
- Debugging insights and inefficiency detection
- **Systematic Code Analysis**: Break down complex code into manageable parts
- **Execution Path Tracing**: Track variable states and call stacks
- **Control & Data Flow**: Understand code logic and data transformations
- **Call Flow Visualization**: Diagram function calling sequences
- **Logical Reasoning**: Explain "why" behind code behavior
- **Debugging Insights**: Identify potential bugs or inefficiencies
## Command Template
```bash
cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: [analysis goal]
TASK: Systematic code analysis and execution path tracing
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
EXPECTED: Execution trace, call flow diagram, debugging insights
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [aspect]
"
```
## Examples
**Basic Code Analysis**:
```bash
# Basic code analysis
/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace authentication flow"
cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: Trace authentication execution flow
TASK: Analyze complete auth flow from request to response
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: Step-by-step execution trace with call diagram, variable states
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on control flow
"
```
# Directory-specific with enhancement
/cli:mode:code-analysis --cd "src/auth" --enhance "how does JWT work"
# Qwen for architecture analysis
/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen "explain microservices communication"
# Codex for deep tracing
/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex --cd "src/api" "trace request lifecycle"
**Directory-Specific Analysis**:
```bash
cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: Understand JWT token validation logic
TASK: Trace JWT validation from middleware to service layer
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: Validation flow diagram, token lifecycle analysis
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on security
"
```
## Code Tracing Workflow
```bash
# 1. Find entry points
rg "function.*main|export.*handler" --files-with-matches
# 1. Find entry points and related files
rg "function.*authenticate|class.*AuthService" --files-with-matches
mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="authenticate|login", file_pattern="*.ts")
# 2. Execute deep analysis
# 2. Build call graph understanding
# entry → middleware → service → repository
# 3. Execute deep analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
/cli:mode:code-analysis --cd "src" "trace execution from entry point"
```
## Output Routing
**Output Destination Logic**:
- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
- **No active session OR standalone analysis**:
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/code-analysis-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Examples**:
- During active session `WFS-auth-refactor`, analyzing auth flow → `.chat/code-analysis-20250105-143022.md`
- No session, tracing request lifecycle → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-request-flow-20250105-143045.md`
## Notes
- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`
- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive code context

View File

@@ -28,48 +28,98 @@ Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning templat
## Execution Flow
1. Parse tool and directory options
2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand planning context
3. Use planning template: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`
4. Execute with `--all-files` in target directory
5. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[topic]"` first
3. Parse topic (original or enhanced)
4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
5. Build command for selected tool with planning template
6. Execute analysis (read-only, no code modification)
7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
## Core Rules
1. **Analysis Only**: This command provides planning recommendations and insights - it does NOT modify code
2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before planning
3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
4. **Template Required**: Always use planning template
5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
## Planning Capabilities (via Template)
- Strategic architecture insights
- Implementation roadmaps
- Key technical decisions
- Strategic architecture insights and recommendations
- Implementation roadmaps and suggestions
- Key technical decisions analysis
- Risk assessment
- Resource planning
## Examples
## Command Template
```bash
# Basic planning
/cli:mode:plan "design user dashboard"
cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: [planning goal from topic]
TASK: Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
EXPECTED: Strategic insights, implementation recommendations, key decisions
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on [topic area]
"
```
# Enhanced with directory scope
/cli:mode:plan --cd "src/api" --enhance "plan API refactoring"
## Examples
# Qwen for architecture planning
/cli:mode:plan --tool qwen "plan microservices migration"
**Basic Planning Analysis**:
```bash
cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: Design user dashboard architecture
TASK: Plan dashboard component structure and data flow
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: Architecture recommendations, component design, data flow diagram
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on scalability
"
```
# Codex for technical planning
/cli:mode:plan --tool codex "plan testing strategy"
**Directory-Specific Planning**:
```bash
cd src/api && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
PURPOSE: Plan API refactoring strategy
TASK: Analyze current API structure and recommend improvements
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: Refactoring roadmap, breaking change analysis, migration plan
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Maintain backward compatibility
"
```
## Planning Workflow
```bash
# 1. Gather existing architecture info
# 1. Discover project structure
~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
# 2. Gather existing architecture info
rg "architecture|design" --files-with-matches
# 2. Execute planning analysis
# 3. Execute planning analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
/cli:mode:plan "topic for strategic planning"
```
## Output Routing
**Output Destination Logic**:
- **Active session exists AND planning is session-relevant**:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
- **No active session OR exploratory planning**:
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/plan-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**Examples**:
- During active session `WFS-dashboard`, planning dashboard architecture → `.chat/plan-20250105-143022.md`
- No session, exploring new feature idea → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143045.md`
## Notes
- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`
- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive project context

View File

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
# Pseudocode flow:
# IF (module_count > 20 OR complex_project_detected):
# → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
# → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
# ELSE:
# → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
#
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to
2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
3. **Choose Strategy**:
- Simple projects: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
- Complex projects: Delegate to memory-gemini-bridge agent
- Complex projects: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated
5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
@@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ Bash(git status --short)
**For Complex Projects (>20 modules):**
The model will delegate to the memory-gemini-bridge agent with structured context:
The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
```javascript
Task "Complex project full update"
subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
prompt: `
CONTEXT:
- Total modules: ${module_count}

View File

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ count=$(echo "$changed" | wc -l)
# Pseudocode flow:
# IF (change_count > 15 OR complex_changes_detected):
# → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
# → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
# ELSE:
# → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
#
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which changed modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
3. **Choose Strategy**:
- Simple changes: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
- Complex changes: Delegate to memory-gemini-bridge agent
- Complex changes: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated for changed modules
5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
@@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ Bash(git diff --stat)
**For Complex Changes (>15 modules):**
The model will delegate to the memory-gemini-bridge agent with structured context:
The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
```javascript
Task "Complex project related update"
subagent_type: "memory-gemini-bridge"
subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
prompt: `
CONTEXT:
- Total modules: ${change_count}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
---
name: auto
description: Orchestrate UI design refinement workflow with interactive checkpoints for user selection
usage: /workflow:design:auto --session <session_id> --images "<glob>" --pages "<list>" [--variants <count>] [--batch-plan]
argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --images \"refs/*.png\" --pages \"dashboard,auth\" [--variants 2] [--batch-plan]"
examples:
- /workflow:design:auto --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png" --pages "login,register"
- /workflow:design:auto --session WFS-dashboard --images "refs/*.jpg" --pages "dashboard" --variants 3 --batch-plan
allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
---
# UI Design Auto Workflow Command
## Overview
Semi-autonomous UI design workflow with interactive checkpoints: style extraction → **user selection** → consolidation → UI generation → **user confirmation** → design update → optional batch planning.
## Coordinator Role
**Checkpoint-based orchestrator**: Execute Phase 1 automatically, pause for user style selection, execute Phase 3, pause for user prototype confirmation, complete with optional batch task generation.
## Execution Model - Checkpoint Workflow
This workflow runs **semi-autonomously** with user checkpoints:
1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-xxx --images "refs/*.png" --pages "dashboard,auth" [--batch-plan]`
2. **Phase 1 executes** (style-extract) → Reports style cards → **⏸️ PAUSE FOR USER SELECTION**
3. **User selects variants** → Runs `style-consolidate --variants "..."` → Auto-continues
4. **Phase 3 executes** (ui-generate) → Reports prototypes → **⏸️ PAUSE FOR USER CONFIRMATION**
5. **User confirms prototypes** → Runs `design-update --selected-prototypes "..."` → Auto-continues
6. **Phase 5 executes** (batch-plan, optional) → Reports task files
**Checkpoint Mechanism**:
- TodoWrite tracks current phase with "awaiting_user_confirmation" status
- System reports output location and exact command for next step
- User runs provided command to continue workflow
- Workflow resumes automatically after user input
## Core Rules
1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files or validate before Phase 1 (commands handle their own validation)
3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command's output for next phase
4. **Pause at Checkpoints**: After Phase 1 and Phase 3, pause and prompt user with exact command to continue
5. **User-Driven Continuation**: Workflow resumes when user runs style-consolidate or design-update commands
6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion and checkpoint
## Parameter Requirements
**Required Parameters**:
- `--session <session_id>`: Active workflow session ID
- `--images "<glob_pattern>"`: Reference image paths for style extraction
- `--pages "<page_list>"`: Comma-separated list of pages to generate
**Optional Parameters**:
- `--variants <count>`: Number of UI variants per page (default: 1)
- `--batch-plan`: Auto-generate implementation tasks for selected prototypes after design-update
## 5-Phase Execution
### Phase 1: Style Extraction
**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:design:style-extract --session {session_id} --images \"{image_glob}\"")`
**Parse Output**:
- Verify: `.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json` created
- Extract: `style_cards_count` from output message
- List available style variant IDs
**Validation**:
- Style cards successfully generated
- At least one style variant available
**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, mark checkpoint "awaiting_user_confirmation"
**⏸️ CHECKPOINT 1: Pause for User Style Selection**
```
Phase 1 Complete: Style Extraction
Style cards generated: {count}
Available variants: {variant_ids}
Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/
⏸️ USER SELECTION REQUIRED
Review style cards and select your preferred variants.
Then run:
/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-{session} --variants "{variant_ids}"
Example: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-{session} --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
```
---
### Phase 2: Style Consolidation (User-Triggered)
**User Command**: `/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session {session_id} --variants "{selected_variants}"`
**After user runs command**:
- Workflow automatically continues to Phase 3
- Parse output: token_count, validation_status
**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
**Output**:
```
Phase 2 Complete: Style Consolidation
Design tokens: {count}
Validation: {pass|warnings}
Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
Continuing to Phase 3: UI Generation...
```
---
### Phase 3: UI Generation (Auto-Triggered after Phase 2)
**Command Construction**:
```bash
variants_flag = --variants present ? "--variants {variants_count}" : ""
command = "/workflow:design:ui-generate --session {session_id} --pages \"{page_list}\" {variants_flag}"
```
**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="{constructed_command}")`
**Parse Output**:
- Verify: `.design/prototypes/*.html` files created
- Extract: `prototype_count`, `page_list`, `generated_files` list
**Validation**:
- All requested pages generated
- HTML and CSS files present for each variant
**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, mark checkpoint "awaiting_user_confirmation"
**⏸️ CHECKPOINT 2: Pause for User Prototype Confirmation**
```
Phase 3 Complete: UI Generation
Prototypes generated: {count} ({page_list})
Generated files: {file_list}
Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
⏸️ USER CONFIRMATION REQUIRED
Review the generated prototypes and select your preferred variants.
Then run:
/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session} --selected-prototypes "{prototype_ids}"
Example: /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session} --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2"
Or to use all generated prototypes:
/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session}
```
---
### Phase 4: Design System Integration (User-Triggered)
**User Command**: `/workflow:design:design-update --session {session_id} [--selected-prototypes "{selected_prototypes}"]`
**After user runs command**:
- Workflow updates brainstorming artifacts
- If --batch-plan flag present, automatically continues to Phase 5
**Parse Output**:
- Verify: `synthesis-specification.md` updated
- Verify: `ui-designer/style-guide.md` created/updated
**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
**Output** (if --batch-plan NOT present):
```
UI Design Refinement Complete for session: WFS-{session}
Design System Summary:
- Tokens: {token_count} (OKLCH-based)
- Prototypes: {prototype_count} ({page_list})
- Validation: {pass|warnings}
Updated Artifacts:
✓ synthesis-specification.md (UI/UX Guidelines section)
✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md (comprehensive style guide)
✓ Design tokens ready for task generation
Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/
Next Steps:
1. Review prototypes: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
2. Continue to planning: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
(The plan phase will automatically discover and utilize the design system)
```
**Output** (if --batch-plan present):
```
Phase 4 Complete: Design System Integration
Updated Artifacts:
✓ synthesis-specification.md
✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md
Continuing to Phase 5: Batch Task Generation...
```
---
### Phase 5: Batch Task Generation (Optional, Auto-Triggered if --batch-plan)
**Condition**: Only executes if `--batch-plan` flag present
**Execution**:
```bash
FOR each page IN selected_prototypes_pages:
SlashCommand(command="/workflow:plan --agent \"Implement {page} page based on design system\"")
# Parse output task file location
task_files.add(output_location)
```
**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
**Return to User**:
```
Phase 5 Complete: Batch Task Generation
Tasks generated for: {page_count} pages
Generated task files:
{task_file_list}
Design workflow complete for session: WFS-{session}
Next: /workflow:execute
```
## TodoWrite Pattern
```javascript
// Initialize (before Phase 1)
TodoWrite({todos: [
{"content": "Execute style extraction from reference images", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
{"content": "Execute style consolidation and token validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing style consolidation"},
{"content": "Execute UI prototype generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI generation"},
{"content": "Execute design system integration to brainstorming", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing design system integration"}
]})
// After Phase 1
TodoWrite({todos: [
{"content": "Execute style extraction from reference images", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
{"content": "Execute style consolidation and token validation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style consolidation"},
{"content": "Execute UI prototype generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI generation"},
{"content": "Execute design system integration to brainstorming", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing design system integration"}
]})
// Continue pattern for Phase 2, 3, 4...
```
## Parameter Processing
### Session Validation
```bash
# Verify active session
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
VERIFY: session_id parameter matches active session
IF mismatch:
ERROR: "Session {session_id} is not active. Active session: {active_session_id}"
```
### Image Glob Expansion
```bash
# Expand glob pattern
expanded_paths = bash(ls {image_glob})
IF no files found:
ERROR: "No images found matching pattern: {image_glob}"
VALIDATE: All files are image formats (.png, .jpg, .jpeg, .webp)
```
### Page List Parsing
```bash
# Parse comma-separated page list
pages = split(page_list, ",")
TRIM: whitespace from each page name
VALIDATE: page_list not empty
```
## Data Flow
```
User Input
├── session_id
├── image_glob → expanded_image_paths
├── page_list → parsed_pages[]
├── --interactive → interactive_mode (bool)
└── --variants → variants_count (int)
Phase 1: style-extract
Input: session_id, expanded_image_paths
Output: style-cards.json
Phase 2: style-consolidate
Input: session_id, interactive_mode | auto-select
Output: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, tailwind.config.js
Phase 3: ui-generate
Input: session_id, parsed_pages[], variants_count
Output: {page}-variant-{n}.html/css for each page
Phase 4: design-update
Input: session_id
Output: Updated synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/style-guide.md
Return summary to user
```
## Error Handling
**Phase Execution Failures**:
- **Keep phase `in_progress`**: Do not proceed to next phase
- **Report error to user**: Include specific failure message from command
- **Provide recovery instructions**: Suggest manual command execution with corrected parameters
**Common Errors**:
1. **Session not found**: Verify session exists and is active
2. **No images found**: Check image glob pattern and file paths
3. **Style extraction failed**: Retry with different images or manual style description
4. **Consolidation validation errors**: Review validation-report.json and address token issues
5. **UI generation failed**: Check synthesis-specification.md for requirements clarity
6. **Integration conflicts**: Review synthesis-specification.md edit conflicts
## Workflow Position
**In Complete Development Flow**:
```
/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "{topic}"
↓ Generates synthesis-specification.md (WHAT)
/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-xxx --images "refs/*.png" --pages "dashboard,auth"
↓ Refines visual design (WHAT → Visual Spec)
/workflow:plan [--agent] "{task description}"
↓ Generates task breakdown (HOW)
/workflow:execute
↓ Implements tasks with design system
```
**Key Benefits**:
1. **Visual Validation**: Users confirm design before implementation
2. **Token Enforcement**: Implementation strictly follows design system
3. **Accessibility**: WCAG AA validated at design phase
4. **Consistency**: Single source of truth for visual design
## Coordinator Checklist
✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command execution
✅ Validate session parameter before Phase 1
✅ Expand image glob to concrete paths
✅ Parse page list to array
✅ Execute Phase 1 immediately (no preliminary analysis)
✅ Parse style card count from Phase 1 output
✅ Construct Phase 2 command based on --interactive flag
✅ Parse token count and validation status from Phase 2
✅ Construct Phase 3 command with variants parameter
✅ Parse prototype count from Phase 3 output
✅ Execute Phase 4 design system integration
✅ Verify all artifacts updated successfully
✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
✅ After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoWrite status
## Integration Notes
**Seamless Workflow Transition**:
- Design phase is **optional but recommended** for UI-heavy projects
- Can be skipped entirely if visual design is not critical
- Brainstorming → Plan flow still works without design phase
- Design artifacts automatically discovered by task-generate if present
**Use Cases**:
- **Use design workflow**: User-facing applications, design systems, brand-critical UIs
- **Skip design workflow**: Backend APIs, CLI tools, prototypes, MVPs
**Artifact Discovery**:
- `task-generate` automatically detects `.design/` directory
- If present, adds design system to task context.artifacts
- UI tasks automatically include `load_design_tokens` in flow_control
This design ensures backward compatibility while enabling powerful visual design workflows when needed.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
---
name: design-update
description: Update brainstorming artifacts with finalized design system
usage: /workflow:design:design-update --session <session_id> [--selected-prototypes "<list>"]
argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--selected-prototypes \"dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2\"]"
examples:
- /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-auth
- /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-dashboard --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1"
allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
---
# Design Update Command
## Overview
Synchronize finalized design system (tokens, style guide, selected prototypes) back to brainstorming artifacts, preparing for `/workflow:plan` phase consumption.
## Core Philosophy
- **Main Claude Execution**: Direct updates by main Claude (avoid Agent context loss, following synthesis pattern)
- **Reference-Based Integration**: Use @ references, not content duplication
- **Synthesis Alignment**: Update synthesis-specification.md UI/UX Guidelines section
- **UI Designer Sync**: Mirror design system to ui-designer/style-guide.md
- **Plan-Ready Output**: Ensure design artifacts discoverable by task-generate
## Execution Protocol
### Phase 1: Session & Design System Validation
```bash
# Validate session and verify design system completeness
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
VERIFY required artifacts:
- .design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
- .design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
- .design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js
- .design/prototypes/*.html (at least one prototype)
IF --selected-prototypes provided:
VALIDATE: Specified prototypes exist
ELSE:
AUTO-SELECT: Use all generated prototypes
```
### Phase 2: Load Design System Context
**Direct Claude Code Execution** (no Agent invocation)
```bash
# Load all design system artifacts
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js)
# Load selected prototype files
FOR each selected_prototype IN selected_prototypes:
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/{selected_prototype}.html)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/{selected_prototype}-notes.md)
# Load target brainstorming artifacts
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md) [if exists]
```
### Phase 3: Update Synthesis Specification
**Direct Write by Main Claude**
Update `.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md`:
```markdown
## UI/UX Guidelines
### Design System Reference
**Finalized Design Tokens**: @../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
**Style Guide**: @../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
**Tailwind Configuration**: @../.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js
### Design Philosophy
[Insert content from style-philosophy.md]
### Token System Overview
**Colors**: OKLCH-based color system with semantic naming
- Brand: primary, secondary, accent
- Surface: background, elevated, sunken
- Semantic: success, warning, error, info
**Typography**: {font_family_count} font families, {scale_count}-step scale
- Heading: {heading_font}
- Body: {body_font}
- Monospace: {mono_font}
**Spacing**: {scale_count}-step scale ({min}rem to {max}rem)
**Components**: Border radius, shadows, and component tokens defined
### Implementation Requirements
**Token Adherence**: All UI implementations MUST use design token CSS custom properties
**Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance validated in design-tokens.json
**Responsive**: Mobile-first design using token-based breakpoints
**Component Patterns**: Follow patterns documented in style-guide.md
### Reference Prototypes
[For each selected prototype:]
- **{page_name}**: @../.design/prototypes/{prototype}.html
- Layout: {layout_description from notes}
- Components: {component_list from notes}
- Token Usage: {token_usage_summary from notes}
### Design System Assets (for task-generate consumption)
```json
{
"design_tokens": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json",
"style_guide": ".design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md",
"tailwind_config": ".design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js",
"prototypes": [
".design/prototypes/{prototype-1}.html",
".design/prototypes/{prototype-2}.html"
]
}
```
```
**Implementation**:
```bash
# Edit synthesis-specification.md
Edit(
file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
old_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n[existing content or empty]",
new_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n\n[new design system content with @ references]"
)
```
### Phase 4: Update UI Designer Analysis
**Create or update** `.brainstorming/ui-designer/style-guide.md`:
```markdown
# UI Designer Style Guide
## Design System Integration
This style guide integrates the finalized design system from the design refinement phase.
**Source Design Tokens**: @../../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
**Source Style Guide**: @../../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
## Design Philosophy
[Content from style-philosophy.md]
## Design Tokens Reference
For complete token definitions, see: @../../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
### Color System
[Summary of color tokens]
### Typography System
[Summary of typography tokens]
### Spacing System
[Summary of spacing tokens]
### Component Tokens
[Summary of component tokens: border-radius, shadows]
## Component Patterns
[Reference to style-guide.md component patterns]
## Implementation Guidelines
1. **Use CSS Custom Properties**: All styles reference design tokens
2. **Follow Semantic HTML**: Use HTML5 semantic elements
3. **Maintain Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance required
4. **Responsive Design**: Mobile-first with token-based breakpoints
## Reference Prototypes
[Links to selected prototypes with descriptions]
---
*Auto-generated by /workflow:design:design-update*
*Last updated: {timestamp}*
```
**Implementation**:
```bash
Write(
file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/style-guide.md",
content="[generated style guide content with @ references]"
)
```
### Phase 5: Create Design System Symlinks (Optional)
**For easier task-generate discovery**
```bash
# Create read-only mirror of key design files in brainstorming space
bash(cd .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming && \
ln -s ../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json design-tokens.json && \
ln -s ../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md design-style-guide.md)
```
### Phase 6: TodoWrite Integration
```javascript
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{
content: "Validate session and design system completeness",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Validating design system"
},
{
content: "Load design tokens, style guide, and selected prototypes",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Loading design artifacts"
},
{
content: "Update synthesis-specification.md with design system references",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Updating synthesis specification"
},
{
content: "Create or update ui-designer/style-guide.md",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Updating UI designer style guide"
},
{
content: "Create design system symlinks for task-generate discovery",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Creating artifact symlinks"
}
]
});
```
## Output Structure
**Updated Files**:
```
.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
├── synthesis-specification.md # Updated with UI/UX Guidelines section
├── ui-designer/
│ └── style-guide.md # New or updated comprehensive style guide
├── design-tokens.json # Symlink to ../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json
└── design-style-guide.md # Symlink to ../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md
```
**Reference Structure** (@ references in synthesis-specification.md):
- `@../.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json`
- `@../.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md`
- `@../.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js`
- `@../.design/prototypes/{prototype}.html`
## Integration with task-generate
After this update, `/workflow:tools:task-generate` will discover:
**In context.artifacts**:
```json
{
"artifacts": [
{
"type": "synthesis_specification",
"path": ".brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
},
{
"type": "design_tokens",
"path": ".design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json"
},
{
"type": "style_guide",
"path": ".design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md"
},
{
"type": "tailwind_config",
"path": ".design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js"
},
{
"type": "ui_prototypes",
"paths": [
".design/prototypes/dashboard-variant-1.html",
".design/prototypes/auth-variant-2.html"
]
}
]
}
```
**In flow_control.pre_analysis** (for UI tasks):
```json
{
"step": "load_design_tokens",
"action": "Load design system tokens and style guide",
"commands": [
"bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)",
"bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md)"
],
"output_to": "design_system_context",
"on_error": "warn"
}
```
## Error Handling
- **Missing design tokens**: Error, run `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` first
- **Missing prototypes**: Error, run `/workflow:design:ui-generate` first
- **synthesis-specification.md not found**: Warning, create minimal version
- **Edit conflicts**: Preserve existing content, append design system section
- **Symlink failures**: Warning only, continue with @ references
## Validation Checks
After update, verify:
- [ ] synthesis-specification.md contains UI/UX Guidelines section
- [ ] UI/UX Guidelines include @ references to design system files
- [ ] ui-designer/style-guide.md created or updated
- [ ] design-tokens.json symlink created (if applicable)
- [ ] All referenced files exist and are readable
## Integration Points
- **Input**: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, prototypes from design phase
- **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/style-guide.md
- **Next Phase**: `/workflow:plan` can now discover and utilize design system
## Completion Message
```
Design system update complete for session: WFS-{session}
Updated artifacts:
✓ synthesis-specification.md - UI/UX Guidelines section added
✓ ui-designer/style-guide.md - Comprehensive style guide created
✓ Design system references: @ notation for all design files
Design system assets ready for task generation:
- design-tokens.json ({token_count} tokens)
- style-guide.md (comprehensive component patterns)
- tailwind.config.js (Tailwind theme extension)
- {prototype_count} reference prototypes
Next: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
The plan phase will automatically discover and utilize the design system.
```
## Main Claude Direct Execution Rationale
This command is executed directly by main Claude (not delegated to an Agent) because:
1. **Context Preservation**: Main Claude has full session context and conversation memory
2. **Integration Complexity**: Requires understanding multiple artifact relationships
3. **Reference Accuracy**: @ reference generation needs precise path resolution
4. **Synthesis Pattern**: Follows the same direct-execution pattern as `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis`
5. **Minimal Transformation**: Primarily reference integration, not generative analysis
6. **Error Recovery**: Main Claude can better handle edit conflicts and missing files
This approach ensures reliable, context-aware integration without Agent handoff overhead.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
---
name: style-consolidate
description: Consolidate user-selected style variants into unified design system
usage: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session <session_id> [--interactive] [--variants "<ids>"]
argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--interactive] [--variants \"variant-1,variant-3\"]"
examples:
- /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-auth --interactive
- /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-dashboard --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
---
# Style Consolidation Command
## Overview
Consolidate user-selected style variants into a unified, production-ready design system with validated CSS tokens and comprehensive style guide.
## Core Philosophy
- **User-Driven Selection**: Interactive mode for visual style card selection
- **Gemini Clustering**: Semantic naming and style philosophy consolidation
- **Codex Validation**: Token consistency, coverage, and accessibility checks
- **Design System Output**: production-ready tokens + comprehensive style guide
## Execution Protocol
### Phase 1: Session & Style Cards Loading
```bash
# Validate session and load extracted style cards
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
VERIFY: .design/style-extraction/style-cards.json exists
LOAD: style-cards.json for user selection
```
### Phase 2: User Selection (Interactive Mode)
**Interactive Mode**: `--interactive` flag enables visual selection interface
```bash
IF --interactive:
DISPLAY: Style card previews with descriptions
PROMPT: "Select preferred style variants (comma-separated IDs):"
COLLECT: user_selection (e.g., "variant-1,variant-3")
ELSE IF --variants provided:
PARSE: variant IDs from --variants flag
ELSE:
ERROR: "Must provide either --interactive or --variants parameter"
```
### Phase 3: Gemini Style Philosophy Consolidation
**Agent Invocation**: Task(conceptual-planning-agent) with Gemini capabilities
```bash
Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
[FLOW_CONTROL]
Consolidate selected style variants into unified design philosophy
## Context Loading
ASSIGNED_TASK: style-consolidation
OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
SELECTED_VARIANTS: {user_selected_variant_ids}
## Flow Control Steps
1. **load_selected_variants**
- Action: Load user-selected style card data
- Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
- Filter: Extract only selected variant IDs
- Output: selected_style_data
2. **load_design_context**
- Action: Load brainstorming design context
- Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md) || Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md)
- Output: design_context
- Optional: true
3. **consolidate_style_philosophy_gemini**
- Action: Synthesize unified style philosophy and semantic naming
- Command: bash(cd .workflow/WFS-{session} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p \"
PURPOSE: Synthesize unified design philosophy from selected style variants
TASK: Create coherent style narrative, consolidate naming conventions, define design principles
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @{.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json,.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md}
EXPECTED:
1. Unified design philosophy statement
2. Consolidated semantic naming for colors (e.g., 'brand-primary', 'surface-elevated')
3. Typography scale rationale
4. Spacing system principles
5. Component design guidelines
RULES: Ensure consistency, maintain accessibility mindset, align with brainstorming synthesis
\")
- Output: style-philosophy.md
## Consolidation Requirements
**Design Philosophy**: Clear statement of visual design principles
**Semantic Naming**: User-centric token names (not generic color-1, color-2)
**Accessibility**: Ensure WCAG AA contrast ratios for text colors
**Consistency**: Unified token naming conventions across all categories
## Expected Deliverables
1. **style-philosophy.md**: Design philosophy and naming rationale
"
```
### Phase 4: Codex Token Validation & Finalization
**Agent Invocation**: Task(conceptual-planning-agent) with Codex capabilities
```bash
Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
[FLOW_CONTROL]
Validate and finalize production-ready design tokens
## Context Loading
INPUT_PHILOSOPHY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md
INPUT_TOKENS: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/design-tokens.json
SELECTED_VARIANTS: {user_selected_variant_ids}
OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
## Flow Control Steps
1. **load_consolidation_inputs**
- Action: Load style philosophy and extracted tokens
- Commands:
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-philosophy.md)
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/design-tokens.json)
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
- Output: consolidation_inputs
2. **validate_and_finalize_tokens_codex**
- Action: Merge selected variants, validate consistency, generate final tokens
- Command: bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation --full-auto exec \"
PURPOSE: Finalize production-ready design tokens with validation
TASK: Merge selected variant tokens, validate consistency, check accessibility, generate final design system
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: @{style-philosophy.md,../style-extraction/design-tokens.json,../style-extraction/style-cards.json,../../../CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED:
1. design-tokens.json - Final validated CSS token definitions
2. tailwind.config.js - Complete Tailwind configuration
3. style-guide.md - Comprehensive design system documentation
4. validation-report.json - Token consistency and accessibility audit
RULES:
- Use semantic names from style-philosophy.md
- Validate WCAG AA contrast ratios (4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI)
- Ensure complete token coverage (colors, typography, spacing, shadows, borders)
- Generate CSS custom properties and Tailwind theme extension
- Include usage examples in style-guide.md
\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
- Output: design-tokens.json, tailwind.config.js, style-guide.md, validation-report.json
## Validation Requirements
**Consistency Checks**:
- All color tokens use OKLCH format
- Spacing scale follows consistent ratio (e.g., 1.5x or 2x progression)
- Typography scale includes appropriate line-heights
- All tokens have semantic names
**Accessibility Checks**:
- Text colors meet WCAG AA contrast (4.5:1)
- UI component colors meet WCAG AA contrast (3:1)
- Focus indicators have sufficient visibility
- Color is not sole differentiator
**Coverage Checks**:
- Primary, secondary, accent color families
- Surface colors (background, elevated, sunken)
- Semantic colors (success, warning, error, info)
- Typography scale (xs to 4xl)
- Spacing scale (0.25rem to 6rem)
- Border radius options
- Shadow layers
## Expected Deliverables
1. **design-tokens.json**: Production-ready CSS token definitions
2. **tailwind.config.js**: Complete Tailwind theme configuration
3. **style-guide.md**: Design system documentation with usage examples
4. **validation-report.json**: Validation audit results
"
```
### Phase 5: TodoWrite Integration
```javascript
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{
content: "Load session and style cards from extraction phase",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Loading style cards"
},
{
content: "Collect user style variant selection (interactive or CLI)",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Collecting user selection"
},
{
content: "Consolidate style philosophy using Gemini",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Consolidating style philosophy"
},
{
content: "Validate and finalize tokens using Codex",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Validating and finalizing tokens"
},
{
content: "Generate design system documentation",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Generating design system docs"
}
]
});
```
## Output Structure
```
.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/
├── style-philosophy.md # Unified design philosophy (Gemini)
├── design-tokens.json # Final validated CSS tokens (Codex)
├── tailwind.config.js # Tailwind theme configuration (Codex)
├── style-guide.md # Design system documentation (Codex)
└── validation-report.json # Accessibility & consistency audit (Codex)
```
### design-tokens.json Format
```json
{
"colors": {
"brand": {
"primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
"secondary": "oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / 1)",
"accent": "oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / 1)"
},
"surface": {
"background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
"elevated": "oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / 1)",
"sunken": "oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / 1)"
},
"semantic": {
"success": "oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / 1)",
"warning": "oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / 1)",
"error": "oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / 1)",
"info": "oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / 1)"
}
},
"typography": {
"font_family": {
"heading": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif",
"body": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif",
"mono": "Fira Code, monospace"
},
"font_size": {
"xs": "0.75rem",
"sm": "0.875rem",
"base": "1rem",
"lg": "1.125rem",
"xl": "1.25rem",
"2xl": "1.5rem",
"3xl": "1.875rem",
"4xl": "2.25rem"
},
"line_height": {
"tight": "1.25",
"normal": "1.5",
"relaxed": "1.75"
}
},
"spacing": {
"0": "0",
"1": "0.25rem",
"2": "0.5rem",
"3": "0.75rem",
"4": "1rem",
"6": "1.5rem",
"8": "2rem",
"12": "3rem",
"16": "4rem",
"24": "6rem"
},
"border_radius": {
"none": "0",
"sm": "0.25rem",
"md": "0.5rem",
"lg": "0.75rem",
"xl": "1rem",
"2xl": "1.5rem",
"full": "9999px"
},
"shadow": {
"sm": "0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
"md": "0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06)",
"lg": "0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
"xl": "0 20px 25px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.15), 0 10px 10px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.04)"
}
}
```
## Error Handling
- **No style cards found**: Run `/workflow:design:style-extract` first
- **Invalid variant IDs**: Display available IDs and prompt re-selection
- **Validation failures**: Report specific issues (contrast, coverage, consistency)
- **Gemini/Codex execution errors**: Retry with fallback to manual token editing
## Integration Points
- **Input**: style-cards.json from `/workflow:design:style-extract`
- **Output**: design-tokens.json for `/workflow:design:ui-generate`
- **Context**: synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/analysis.md
## Next Steps
After successful consolidation:
```
Style consolidation complete for session: WFS-{session}
Design tokens validated and finalized
Validation summary:
- Colors: {count} (WCAG AA compliant: {pass_count}/{total_count})
- Typography: {scale_count} sizes
- Spacing: {scale_count} values
- Accessibility: {pass|warnings}
Next: /workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-{session} --pages "dashboard,auth"
```

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
---
name: style-extract
description: Extract design style from reference images using triple vision analysis (Claude Code + Gemini + Codex)
usage: /workflow:design:style-extract --session <session_id> --images "<glob_pattern>"
argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --images \"path/to/*.png\""
examples:
- /workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png"
- /workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-dashboard --images "refs/dashboard-*.jpg"
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
---
# Style Extraction Command
## Overview
Extract design style elements from reference images using triple vision analysis: Claude Code's native vision, Gemini Vision for semantic understanding, and Codex for structured token generation.
## Core Philosophy
- **Triple Vision Analysis**: Combine Claude Code, Gemini Vision, and Codex vision capabilities
- **Comprehensive Coverage**: Claude Code for quick analysis, Gemini for deep semantic understanding, Codex for structured output
- **Consensus-Based Extraction**: Synthesize results from all three sources
- **Style Card System**: Generate reusable style cards for consolidation phase
- **Multi-Image Support**: Process multiple reference images and extract common patterns
## Execution Protocol
### Phase 1: Session & Input Validation
```bash
# Validate session and locate images
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
EXPAND: glob pattern to concrete image paths
VERIFY: at least one image file exists
```
### Phase 2: Claude Code Vision Analysis (Quick Initial Pass)
**Direct Execution**: Use Read tool with image paths
```bash
# Claude Code's native vision capability for quick initial analysis
FOR each image IN expanded_image_paths:
Read({image_path})
# Claude Code analyzes image and extracts basic patterns
# Write preliminary analysis
Write(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/claude_vision_analysis.json)
```
**Output**: `claude_vision_analysis.json` with Claude Code's initial observations
### Phase 3: Gemini Vision Analysis (Deep Semantic Understanding)
**Direct Bash Execution**: No agent wrapper
```bash
bash(cd .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction && \
~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
PURPOSE: Extract deep design semantics from reference images
TASK: Analyze color palettes, typography, spacing, layout principles, component styles, design philosophy
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @{../../{image_paths}}
EXPECTED: JSON with comprehensive semantic style description (colors with names, font characteristics, spacing scale, design philosophy, UI patterns)
RULES: Focus on extracting semantic meaning and design intent, not exact pixel values. Identify design system patterns.
")
# Output: gemini_vision_analysis.json
```
**Output**: `gemini_vision_analysis.json` with Gemini's deep semantic analysis
### Phase 4: Codex Vision Analysis (Structured Pattern Recognition)
**Direct Bash Execution**: Codex with -i parameter
```bash
bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction --full-auto -i {image_paths} exec "
PURPOSE: Analyze reference images for structured design patterns
TASK: Extract color values, typography specs, spacing measurements, component patterns
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: Reference images provided via -i parameter
EXPECTED: Structured JSON with precise design specifications
RULES: Focus on measurable design attributes and component patterns
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
# Output: codex_vision_analysis.json
```
**Output**: `codex_vision_analysis.json` with Codex's structured analysis
### Phase 5: Synthesis of Triple Vision Analysis
**Direct Execution**: Main Claude synthesizes all three analyses
```bash
# Read all three vision analysis results
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/claude_vision_analysis.json)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/gemini_vision_analysis.json)
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/codex_vision_analysis.json)
# Load optional session context
Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md) [optional]
# Synthesize consensus analysis
# Main Claude identifies common patterns, resolves conflicts, creates unified semantic analysis
Write(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/semantic_style_analysis.json)
```
**Synthesis Strategy**:
- **Color system**: Consensus from all three sources, prefer Codex for precise values
- **Typography**: Gemini for semantic understanding, Codex for measurements
- **Spacing**: Cross-validate across all three,identify consistent patterns
- **Design philosophy**: Weighted combination with Gemini having highest weight
- **Conflict resolution**: Majority vote or use context from synthesis-specification.md
**Output**: `semantic_style_analysis.json` - unified analysis synthesizing all three sources
### Phase 6: Structured Token Generation
**Direct Bash Execution**: Codex generates CSS tokens
```bash
bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: Convert synthesized semantic analysis to structured CSS design tokens
TASK: Generate W3C-compliant design tokens, Tailwind config, and style card variants
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: @{semantic_style_analysis.json,../../../../CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED: design-tokens.json (OKLCH format), tailwind-tokens.js, style-cards.json (3 variants)
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/design-tokens-schema.md) | OKLCH colors, rem spacing, semantic naming
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
```
**Output**:
- `design-tokens.json`: W3C-compliant tokens in OKLCH format
- `tailwind-tokens.js`: Tailwind theme extension
- `style-cards.json`: 3 style variant cards for user selection
- Command: bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction --full-auto exec \"
PURPOSE: Generate structured CSS design tokens from semantic analysis
TASK: Convert semantic color/typography/spacing to OKLCH CSS variables and Tailwind config
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: @{semantic_style_analysis.json,../../../../CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED:
1. design-tokens.json with OKLCH color values, font stacks, spacing scale
2. tailwind-tokens.js with Tailwind config extension
3. style-cards.json with named style variants for user selection
RULES: Use OKLCH for colors, rem for spacing, maintain semantic naming, generate 2-3 style card variants
\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
- Output: design-tokens.json, tailwind-tokens.js, style-cards.json
## Token Requirements
**Color Format**: OKLCH with fallback (e.g., \"oklch(0.65 0.15 270 / 1)\")
**Spacing Scale**: rem-based (0.25rem, 0.5rem, 1rem, 1.5rem, 2rem, 3rem, 4rem, 6rem)
**Typography Scale**: rem-based with line-height (xs, sm, base, lg, xl, 2xl, 3xl, 4xl)
**Border Radius**: rem-based (none, sm, md, lg, xl, 2xl, full)
**Shadows**: Layered shadows with OKLCH colors
## Expected Deliverables
1. **design-tokens.json**: Structured CSS token definitions
2. **tailwind-tokens.js**: Tailwind configuration extension
3. **style-cards.json**: Multiple style variants for user selection
"
```
### Phase 4: TodoWrite Integration
```javascript
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{
content: "Validate session and locate reference images",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Validating session and images"
},
{
content: "Extract visual semantics using Gemini Vision",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Extracting visual semantics"
},
{
content: "Generate structured CSS tokens using Codex",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Generating CSS tokens"
},
{
content: "Create style cards for consolidation phase",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Creating style cards"
}
]
});
```
## Output Structure
```
.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-extraction/
├── semantic_style_analysis.json # Gemini Vision semantic analysis
├── design-tokens.json # Structured CSS tokens (OKLCH)
├── tailwind-tokens.js # Tailwind config extension
└── style-cards.json # Style variants for user selection
```
### style-cards.json Format
```json
{
"style_cards": [
{
"id": "variant-1",
"name": "Modern Minimalist",
"description": "Clean, high contrast with bold typography",
"preview": {
"primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
"background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
"font_heading": "Inter, system-ui, sans-serif",
"border_radius": "0.5rem"
}
},
{
"id": "variant-2",
"name": "Soft Neumorphic",
"description": "Subtle shadows with gentle colors",
"preview": {
"primary": "oklch(0.60 0.10 200 / 1)",
"background": "oklch(0.95 0.02 200 / 1)",
"font_heading": "Poppins, sans-serif",
"border_radius": "1rem"
}
}
]
}
```
## Error Handling
- **No images found**: Report error and suggest correct glob pattern
- **Gemini Vision failure**: Retry once, then fall back to manual style description
- **Codex token generation failure**: Use default token template and report warning
- **Invalid session**: Prompt user to start workflow session first
## Integration Points
- **Input**: Reference images (PNG, JPG, WebP)
- **Output**: Style cards for `/workflow:design:style-consolidate`
- **Context**: Optional synthesis-specification.md or ui-designer/analysis.md
## Next Steps
After successful extraction:
```
Style extraction complete for session: WFS-{session}
Style cards generated: {count}
Next: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-{session} [--interactive]
```

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
---
name: ui-generate
description: Generate UI prototypes using consolidated design tokens with optional style overrides
usage: /workflow:design:ui-generate --session <session_id> --pages "<page_list>" [--variants <count>] [--style-overrides "<path_or_json>"]
argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --pages \"dashboard,auth\" [--variants 2] [--style-overrides \"overrides.json\"]"
examples:
- /workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-auth --pages "login,register"
- /workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-dashboard --pages "dashboard" --variants 3 --style-overrides "overrides.json"
allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
---
# UI Generation Command
## Overview
Generate production-ready UI prototypes (HTML/CSS) strictly adhering to consolidated design tokens and synthesis specification requirements.
## Core Philosophy
- **Token-Driven**: All styles reference design-tokens.json, no hardcoded values
- **Specification-Aligned**: UI structure follows synthesis-specification.md requirements
- **Codex Primary**: Code generation with strict token enforcement
- **Gemini Variants**: Optional semantic layout variations
- **Production-Ready**: Clean HTML5, semantic markup, accessibility attributes
## Execution Protocol
### Phase 1: Session & Requirements Loading
```bash
# Validate session and load design system
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
VERIFY: .design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json exists
PARSE: --pages parameter to page list
SET: variants_count = --variants || 1
```
### Phase 2: Context Gathering
**Load comprehensive context for UI generation**
```bash
LOAD: design-tokens.json (style system)
LOAD: style-guide.md (usage guidelines)
LOAD: synthesis-specification.md (functional requirements)
LOAD: ui-designer/analysis.md (UX guidelines, optional)
PARSE: page_requirements for each page in --pages list
```
### Phase 3: Codex UI Generation (Primary)
**Agent Invocation**: Task(conceptual-planning-agent) with Codex capabilities
```bash
Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
[FLOW_CONTROL]
Generate production-ready UI prototypes with strict design token adherence
## Context Loading
ASSIGNED_TASK: ui-prototype-generation
OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
TARGET_PAGES: {page_list}
VARIANTS_PER_PAGE: {variants_count}
## Flow Control Steps
1. **load_design_system**
- Action: Load finalized design tokens and style guide
- Commands:
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/design-tokens.json)
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/style-guide.md)
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/style-consolidation/tailwind.config.js)
- Output: design_system
2. **load_requirements**
- Action: Load functional and UX requirements
- Commands:
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)
- Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md) [optional]
- Output: requirements_context
3. **generate_ui_prototypes_codex**
- Action: Generate HTML/CSS prototypes with strict token enforcement
- Command: bash(codex -C .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes --full-auto exec \"
PURPOSE: Generate production-ready UI prototypes adhering to design tokens
TASK: Create HTML/CSS prototypes for pages: {page_list} with {variants_count} variant(s) each
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: @{../style-consolidation/design-tokens.json,../style-consolidation/style-guide.md,../../.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md,../../../../CLAUDE.md}
EXPECTED:
For each page, generate {variants_count} variant(s):
1. {page}-variant-{n}.html - Complete HTML structure
2. {page}-variant-{n}.css - CSS using design token custom properties
3. {page}-variant-{n}-notes.md - Implementation notes and token usage
RULES:
- ALL styles MUST reference design token CSS custom properties (--color-brand-primary, --spacing-4, etc.)
- NO hardcoded colors, spacing, or typography values
- Use semantic HTML5 elements (header, nav, main, section, article, footer)
- Include ARIA labels and accessibility attributes (role, aria-label, aria-describedby)
- Implement responsive design using token-based breakpoints
- Follow component patterns from style-guide.md
- Include placeholder content matching page purpose
- Variants explore different layouts while maintaining token consistency
- Generate CSS custom properties mapping in each CSS file
\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
- Output: {page}-variant-{n}.html, {page}-variant-{n}.css, {page}-variant-{n}-notes.md
## Generation Requirements
**Token Adherence**:
- Use CSS custom properties for all design values
- Reference design-tokens.json for property definitions
- Example: `color: var(--color-brand-primary);`
- Example: `padding: var(--spacing-4) var(--spacing-6);`
- Example: `font-size: var(--font-size-lg);`
**Semantic HTML**:
```html
<header role=\"banner\">
<nav role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Main navigation\">
<!-- Navigation items -->
</nav>
</header>
<main role=\"main\">
<section aria-labelledby=\"section-heading\">
<h2 id=\"section-heading\">Section Title</h2>
<!-- Content -->
</section>
</main>
<footer role=\"contentinfo\">
<!-- Footer content -->
</footer>
```
**Accessibility Requirements**:
- Proper heading hierarchy (h1 → h2 → h3)
- Alt text for images
- ARIA labels for interactive elements
- Keyboard navigation support
- Focus indicators using token colors
- Sufficient color contrast (validated against tokens)
**Responsive Design**:
- Mobile-first approach
- Token-based breakpoints (e.g., --breakpoint-md: 768px)
- Flexible layouts using CSS Grid or Flexbox
- Responsive typography using clamp() with token values
## Expected Deliverables
For each page in {page_list}:
1. **{page}-variant-{n}.html**: Complete HTML prototype
2. **{page}-variant-{n}.css**: Token-driven CSS
3. **{page}-variant-{n}-notes.md**: Implementation notes
"
```
### Phase 4: Gemini Variant Suggestions (Optional)
**Conditional Execution**: Only if --variants > 1
```bash
IF variants_count > 1:
Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
Generate semantic layout variation suggestions using Gemini
TASK: Analyze synthesis-specification.md and suggest {variants_count} layout approaches
CONTEXT: synthesis-specification.md, ui-designer/analysis.md
OUTPUT: variant-suggestions.md with layout rationale for each variant
Use Gemini to explore:
- Different information hierarchy approaches
- Alternative component compositions
- Varied user flow emphasis
- Diverse layout patterns (sidebar, top-nav, card-grid, list-detail)
"
```
### Phase 5: TodoWrite Integration
```javascript
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{
content: "Validate session and load design system",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Loading design system"
},
{
content: "Load functional requirements and UX guidelines",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Loading requirements"
},
{
content: "Generate UI prototypes using Codex with token enforcement",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Generating UI prototypes"
},
{
content: "Generate layout variant suggestions using Gemini (optional)",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Generating variant suggestions"
},
{
content: "Create implementation notes for each prototype",
status: "completed",
activeForm: "Creating implementation notes"
}
]
});
```
## Output Structure
```
.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
├── dashboard-variant-1.html
├── dashboard-variant-1.css
├── dashboard-variant-1-notes.md
├── dashboard-variant-2.html (if --variants 2)
├── dashboard-variant-2.css
├── dashboard-variant-2-notes.md
├── auth-variant-1.html
├── auth-variant-1.css
├── auth-variant-1-notes.md
├── design-tokens.css # CSS custom properties from design-tokens.json
└── variant-suggestions.md # Gemini layout rationale (if variants > 1)
```
### HTML Prototype Example
```html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Dashboard - Variant 1</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="design-tokens.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="dashboard-variant-1.css">
</head>
<body>
<header role="banner" class="header">
<nav role="navigation" aria-label="Main navigation" class="nav">
<!-- Token-based navigation -->
</nav>
</header>
<main role="main" class="main">
<section aria-labelledby="dashboard-heading" class="dashboard-section">
<h1 id="dashboard-heading" class="heading-primary">Dashboard</h1>
<!-- Content using design tokens -->
</section>
</main>
<footer role="contentinfo" class="footer">
<!-- Footer content -->
</footer>
</body>
</html>
```
### CSS Example
```css
/* Design Tokens (auto-generated from design-tokens.json) */
:root {
--color-brand-primary: oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1);
--color-surface-background: oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1);
--spacing-4: 1rem;
--spacing-6: 1.5rem;
--font-size-lg: 1.125rem;
--border-radius-md: 0.5rem;
--shadow-md: 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07);
}
/* Component Styles (using tokens) */
.header {
background-color: var(--color-surface-elevated);
padding: var(--spacing-4) var(--spacing-6);
box-shadow: var(--shadow-md);
}
.heading-primary {
font-size: var(--font-size-3xl);
color: var(--color-brand-primary);
margin-bottom: var(--spacing-6);
}
```
## Error Handling
- **No design tokens found**: Run `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` first
- **Invalid page names**: List available pages from synthesis-specification.md
- **Codex generation errors**: Retry with simplified requirements, report warnings
- **Token reference errors**: Validate all CSS against design-tokens.json
## Quality Checks
After generation, verify:
- [ ] All CSS values reference design token custom properties
- [ ] No hardcoded colors, spacing, or typography
- [ ] Semantic HTML structure
- [ ] Accessibility attributes present
- [ ] Responsive design implemented
- [ ] Token-driven styling consistent across variants
## Integration Points
- **Input**: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, synthesis-specification.md
- **Output**: HTML/CSS prototypes for `/workflow:design:design-update`
- **Context**: ui-designer/analysis.md for UX guidance
## Next Steps
After successful generation:
```
UI prototypes generated for session: WFS-{session}
Pages: {page_list}
Variants per page: {variants_count}
Generated files:
- {count} HTML prototypes
- {count} CSS files (token-driven)
- {count} implementation notes
Review prototypes and select preferred variants:
Location: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/prototypes/
Next: /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-{session}
```

View File

@@ -1,256 +1,590 @@
---
name: docs
description: Generate hierarchical architecture and API documentation using doc-generator agent with flow_control
usage: /workflow:docs <type> [scope]
argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all"
description: Documentation planning and orchestration - creates structured documentation tasks for execution
usage: /workflow:docs <type> [options]
argument-hint: "architecture"|"api"|"all" [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
examples:
- /workflow:docs all
- /workflow:docs architecture src/modules
- /workflow:docs api --scope api/
- /workflow:docs all # Complete documentation (gemini default)
- /workflow:docs all --tool qwen # Use Qwen for architecture focus
- /workflow:docs architecture --scope src/modules
- /workflow:docs api --tool gemini --scope api/
---
# Workflow Documentation Command
## Purpose
**`/workflow:docs` is a pure planner/orchestrator** - it analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. It does **NOT** generate any documentation content itself.
**Key Principle**: Separation of Concerns
- **docs.md** → Planning, session creation, task generation
- **doc-generator.md** → Execution, content generation, quality assurance
## Usage
```bash
/workflow:docs <type> [scope]
/workflow:docs <type> [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--scope <path>]
```
## Input Detection
- **Document Types**: `architecture`, `api`, `all` → Creates appropriate documentation tasks
- **Scope**: Optional module/directory filtering → Focuses documentation generation
- **Default**: `all` → Complete documentation suite
### Parameters
## Core Workflow
- **type**: `architecture` | `api` | `all` (required)
- `architecture`: System design, module interactions, patterns
- `api`: Endpoint documentation, API specifications
- `all`: Complete documentation suite
### Planning & Task Creation Process
The command performs structured planning and task creation:
- **--tool**: `gemini` | `qwen` | `codex` (optional, default: gemini)
- `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
- `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
- `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
**0. Pre-Planning Architecture Analysis** ⚠️ MANDATORY FIRST STEP
- **System Structure Analysis**: MUST run `bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)` for dynamic task decomposition
- **Module Boundary Identification**: Understand module organization and dependencies
- **Architecture Pattern Recognition**: Identify architectural styles and design patterns
- **Foundation for documentation**: Use structure analysis to guide task decomposition
- **--scope**: Directory path filter (optional)
**1. Documentation Planning**
- **Type Analysis**: Determine documentation scope (architecture/api/all)
- **Module Discovery**: Use architecture analysis results to identify components
- **Dynamic Task Decomposition**: Analyze project structure to determine optimal task count and module grouping
- **Session Management**: Create or use existing documentation session
## Planning Workflow
**2. Task Generation**
- **Create session**: `.workflow/WFS-docs-[timestamp]/`
- **Create active marker**: `.workflow/.active-WFS-docs-[timestamp]` (must match session folder name)
- **Generate IMPL_PLAN.md**: Documentation requirements and task breakdown
- **Create task.json files**: Individual documentation tasks with flow_control
- **Setup TODO_LIST.md**: Progress tracking for documentation generation
### Complete Execution Flow
### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
- **Check for active sessions**: Look for `.workflow/.active-WFS-docs-*` markers
- **Marker naming**: Active marker must exactly match session folder name
- **Session creation**: `WFS-docs-[timestamp]` folder with matching `.active-WFS-docs-[timestamp]` marker
- **Task execution**: Use `/workflow:execute` to run individual documentation tasks within active session
- **Session isolation**: Each documentation session maintains independent context and state
```
/workflow:docs [type] [--tool] [--scope]
Phase 1: Init Session → Create session dir & active marker
Phase 2: Module Analysis → Run get_modules_by_depth.sh
Phase 3: Quick Assess → Check existing docs
Phase 4: Decompose → Create task list & TodoWrite
Phase 5: Generate Tasks → Build IMPL-*.json & plans
✅ Planning Complete → Show TodoWrite status
```
## Output Structure
### Phase Details
#### Phase 1: Session Initialization
```bash
# Parse arguments and create session structure
doc_type="all" # architecture|api|all
tool="gemini" # gemini|qwen|codex (default: gemini)
scope="" # optional path filter
timestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
session_dir=".workflow/WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
mkdir -p "${session_dir}"/{.task,.process,.summaries}
touch ".workflow/.active-WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
```
#### Phase 2: Project Structure Analysis (MANDATORY)
```bash
# Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for module hierarchy
module_data=$(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
# Format: depth:N|path:<PATH>|files:N|size:N|has_claude:yes/no
```
#### Phase 3: Quick Documentation Assessment
```bash
# Lightweight check - no heavy analysis
existing_docs=$(find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.md" -not -path "./.workflow/*" | wc -l)
if [[ $existing_docs -gt 5 ]]; then
find . -maxdepth 3 -name "*.md" > "${session_dir}/.process/existing-docs.txt"
fi
# Record strategy
cat > "${session_dir}/.process/strategy.md" <<EOF
**Type**: ${doc_type}
**Tool**: ${tool}
**Scope**: ${scope:-"Full project"}
EOF
```
#### Phase 4: Task Decomposition & TodoWrite Setup
**Decomposition Strategy**:
1. **Always create**: System Overview task (IMPL-001)
2. **If architecture/all**: Architecture Documentation task
3. **If api/all**: Unified API Documentation task
4. **For each module**: Module Documentation task (grouped)
**Grouping Rules**:
- Max 3 modules per task
- Max 30 files per task
- Group by dependency depth and functional similarity
**TodoWrite Setup**:
```
✅ Session initialization (completed)
⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
⏳ IMPL-003: Module 'api' (pending)
⏳ IMPL-004: Architecture Documentation (pending)
⏳ IMPL-005: API Documentation (pending)
```
#### Phase 5: Task JSON Generation
Each task follows the 5-field schema with detailed flow_control.
**Command Generation Logic**:
```bash
# Build tool-specific command at planning time
if [[ "$tool" == "codex" ]]; then
cmd="codex -C ${dir} --full-auto exec \"...\""
else
cmd="bash(cd ${dir} && ~/.claude/scripts/${tool}-wrapper -p \"...\")"
fi
```
## Task Templates
### 1. System Overview (IMPL-001)
**Purpose**: Project-level documentation
**Output**: `.workflow/docs/README.md`
**Complete JSON Structure**:
```json
{
"id": "IMPL-001",
"title": "Generate Project Overview Documentation",
"status": "pending",
"meta": {
"type": "docs",
"agent": "@doc-generator",
"tool": "gemini",
"template": "project-overview"
},
"context": {
"requirements": [
"Document project purpose, architecture, and getting started guide",
"Create navigation structure for all documentation",
"Use Project-Level Documentation Template"
],
"focus_paths": ["."],
"acceptance": [
"Complete .workflow/docs/README.md following template",
"All template sections populated with accurate information",
"Navigation links to module and API documentation"
],
"scope": "Project root and overall structure"
},
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "discover_project_structure",
"action": "Analyze project structure and modules",
"command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
"output_to": "system_structure"
},
{
"step": "discover_project_files",
"action": "Identify key project files",
"command": "bash(find . -maxdepth 2 -type f \\( -name '*.json' -o -name '*.md' -o -name '*.yml' -o -name '*.yaml' \\) | head -30)",
"output_to": "project_files"
},
{
"step": "analyze_tech_stack",
"action": "Analyze technology stack and dependencies",
"command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project technology stack\\nTASK: Extract tech stack, architecture patterns, design principles\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: System structure: [system_structure]\\n Project files: [project_files]\\nEXPECTED: Technology analysis with architecture style\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt)\")",
"output_to": "tech_analysis",
"on_error": "fail",
"note": "Command is built at planning time based on $tool variable (gemini/qwen/codex)"
}
],
"implementation_approach": {
"task_description": "Use tech_analysis to populate Project-Level Documentation Template",
"logic_flow": [
"Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt",
"Parse tech_analysis for: purpose, architecture, tech stack, design principles",
"Fill template sections with extracted information",
"Generate navigation links to module/API docs",
"Format output as Markdown"
]
},
"target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
}
}
```
### 2. Module Documentation (IMPL-002+)
**Purpose**: Module-level documentation
**Output**: `.workflow/docs/modules/[name]/README.md`
**Complete JSON Structure**:
```json
{
"id": "IMPL-002",
"title": "Document Module: 'auth'",
"status": "pending",
"meta": {
"type": "docs",
"agent": "@doc-generator",
"tool": "gemini",
"template": "module-documentation"
},
"context": {
"requirements": [
"Document module purpose, internal architecture, public API",
"Include dependencies and usage examples",
"Use Module-Level Documentation Template"
],
"focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
"acceptance": [
"Complete .workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md",
"All exported functions/classes documented",
"Working code examples included"
],
"scope": "auth module only"
},
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "load_system_context",
"action": "Load system architecture from IMPL-001",
"command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL-001-system_structure.output 2>/dev/null || ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
"output_to": "system_context",
"on_error": "skip_optional"
},
{
"step": "analyze_module_structure",
"action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
"command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}\\n System: [system_context]\\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
"output_to": "module_analysis",
"on_error": "fail",
"note": "For qwen: qwen-wrapper | For codex: codex -C src/auth --full-auto exec \"...\" --skip-git-repo-check"
}
],
"implementation_approach": {
"task_description": "Use module_analysis to populate Module-Level Documentation Template",
"logic_flow": [
"Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt",
"Parse module_analysis for: purpose, components, API, dependencies",
"Fill template sections with extracted information",
"Generate code examples from actual usage",
"Format output as Markdown"
]
},
"target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/auth/README.md"]
}
}
```
### 3. Architecture Documentation (if requested)
**Purpose**: System design and patterns
**Output**: `.workflow/docs/architecture/`
**Complete JSON Structure**:
```json
{
"id": "IMPL-N-1",
"title": "Generate Architecture Documentation",
"status": "pending",
"meta": {
"type": "docs",
"agent": "@doc-generator",
"tool": "qwen",
"template": "architecture"
},
"context": {
"requirements": [
"Document system design patterns and architectural decisions",
"Create module interaction diagrams",
"Explain data flow and component relationships"
],
"focus_paths": ["."],
"acceptance": [
"Complete architecture documentation in .workflow/docs/architecture/",
"Diagrams explaining system design",
"Clear explanation of architectural patterns"
]
},
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "load_all_module_docs",
"action": "Aggregate all module documentation",
"command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/modules -name 'README.md' -exec cat {} \\;)",
"output_to": "module_docs",
"on_error": "fail"
},
{
"step": "analyze_architecture",
"action": "Synthesize system architecture from modules",
"command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Synthesize system architecture\\nTASK: Create architecture documentation from module docs\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture documentation with patterns\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/project-overview.txt) | Focus on design patterns, data flow, component interactions\")",
"output_to": "architecture_analysis",
"on_error": "fail",
"note": "Command varies: gemini-wrapper (default) | qwen-wrapper | codex exec"
}
],
"implementation_approach": {
"task_description": "Create architecture documentation from synthesis",
"logic_flow": [
"Parse architecture_analysis for patterns and design decisions",
"Create text-based diagrams (mermaid/ASCII) for module interactions",
"Document data flow between components",
"Explain architectural decisions and trade-offs",
"Format as structured documentation"
]
},
"target_files": [
".workflow/docs/architecture/system-design.md",
".workflow/docs/architecture/module-map.md",
".workflow/docs/architecture/data-flow.md"
]
}
}
```
### 4. API Documentation (if requested)
**Purpose**: API reference and specifications
**Output**: `.workflow/docs/api/README.md`
**Complete JSON Structure**:
```json
{
"id": "IMPL-N",
"title": "Generate Unified API Documentation",
"status": "pending",
"meta": {
"type": "docs",
"agent": "@doc-generator",
"tool": "gemini",
"template": "api-reference"
},
"context": {
"requirements": [
"Document all API endpoints with request/response formats",
"Include authentication and error handling",
"Generate OpenAPI specification if applicable",
"Use API-Level Documentation Template"
],
"focus_paths": ["src/api", "src/routes", "src/controllers"],
"acceptance": [
"Complete .workflow/docs/api/README.md following template",
"All endpoints documented with examples",
"OpenAPI spec generated if REST API detected"
]
},
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "discover_api_endpoints",
"action": "Find all API routes and endpoints",
"command": "bash(rg -t ts -t js '(router\\.|app\\.|@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch))' src/ --no-heading | head -100)",
"output_to": "endpoint_discovery",
"on_error": "skip_optional"
},
{
"step": "analyze_api_structure",
"action": "Analyze API structure and patterns",
"command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document API comprehensively\\nTASK: Extract endpoints, auth, request/response formats\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*,src/routes/**/*,src/controllers/**/*}\\n Endpoints: [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: Complete API documentation\\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt)\")",
"output_to": "api_analysis",
"on_error": "fail",
"note": "Tool-specific: gemini-wrapper | qwen-wrapper | codex -C src/api exec"
}
],
"implementation_approach": {
"task_description": "Use api_analysis to populate API-Level Documentation Template",
"logic_flow": [
"Load template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/api-reference.txt",
"Parse api_analysis for: endpoints, auth, request/response",
"Fill template sections with extracted information",
"Generate OpenAPI spec if REST API detected",
"Format output as Markdown"
]
},
"target_files": [
".workflow/docs/api/README.md",
".workflow/docs/api/openapi.yaml"
]
}
}
```
## Planning Outputs
### File Structure
```
.workflow/
├── .active-WFS-docs-20240120-143022
└── WFS-docs-20240120-143022/
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Implementation plan
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracker
├── .process/
│ ├── strategy.md # Doc strategy
│ └── existing-docs.txt # Existing docs list
└── .task/
├── IMPL-001.json # System overview
├── IMPL-002.json # Module: auth
├── IMPL-003.json # Module: api
├── IMPL-004.json # Architecture
└── IMPL-005.json # API docs
```
### IMPL_PLAN.md
```markdown
# Documentation Implementation Plan
**Session**: WFS-docs-[timestamp]
**Type**: [architecture|api|all]
**Tool**: [gemini|qwen|codex]
## Task Breakdown
### IMPL-001: System Overview
- **Output**: .workflow/docs/README.md
- **Template**: project-overview.txt
### IMPL-002+: Module Documentation
- **Modules**: [list]
- **Template**: module-documentation.txt
### IMPL-N: Architecture/API (if requested)
- **Template**: architecture.txt / api-reference.txt
## Execution Order
1. IMPL-001 (Foundation)
2. IMPL-002 to IMPL-[M] (Modules - can parallelize)
3. IMPL-[M+1] (Architecture - needs modules)
4. IMPL-[N] (API - can run after IMPL-001)
```
### TODO_LIST.md
```markdown
# Documentation Progress Tracker
- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Generate Project Overview
- [ ] **IMPL-002**: Document Module: 'auth'
- [ ] **IMPL-003**: Document Module: 'api'
- [ ] **IMPL-004**: Generate Architecture Documentation
- [ ] **IMPL-005**: Generate Unified API Documentation
## Execution
```bash
/workflow:execute IMPL-001
/workflow:execute IMPL-002
# ...
```
```
## Execution Phase
### Via /workflow:execute
```
For Each Task (IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...):
/workflow:execute IMPL-NNN
TodoWrite: pending → in_progress
Execute flow_control (pre_analysis steps)
Generate Documentation (apply template)
TodoWrite: in_progress → completed
✅ Task Complete
```
### TodoWrite Status Tracking
**Planning Phase**:
```
✅ Session initialization (completed)
⏳ IMPL-001: Project Overview (pending)
⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (pending)
```
**Execution Phase**:
```
Executing IMPL-001:
✅ Session initialization
🔄 IMPL-001: Project Overview (in_progress)
⏳ IMPL-002: Module 'auth'
After IMPL-001:
✅ Session initialization
✅ IMPL-001: Project Overview (completed)
🔄 IMPL-002: Module 'auth' (in_progress)
```
## Documentation Output
### Final Structure
```
.workflow/docs/
├── README.md # System navigation
├── modules/ # Level 1: Module documentation
│ ├── [module-1]/
│ ├── overview.md
│ │ ├── api.md
│ │ ├── dependencies.md
│ │ └── examples.md
│ └── [module-n]/...
├── architecture/ # Level 2: System architecture
├── README.md # IMPL-001: Project overview
├── modules/
│ ├── auth/README.md # IMPL-002: Auth module
└── api/README.md # IMPL-003: API module
├── architecture/ # IMPL-004: Architecture
│ ├── system-design.md
│ ├── module-map.md
── data-flow.md
│ └── tech-stack.md
└── api/ # Level 2: Unified API docs
├── unified-api.md
── data-flow.md
└── api/ # IMPL-005: API docs
├── README.md
└── openapi.yaml
```
## Task Decomposition Standards
## Next Steps
### Dynamic Task Planning Rules
**Module Grouping**: Max 3 modules per task, max 30 files per task
**Task Count**: Calculate based on `total_modules ÷ 3 (rounded up) + base_tasks`
**File Limits**: Split tasks when file count exceeds 30 in any module group
**Base Tasks**: System overview (1) + Architecture (1) + API consolidation (1)
**Module Tasks**: Group related modules by dependency depth and functional similarity
### Documentation Task Types
**IMPL-001**: System Overview Documentation
- Project structure analysis
- Technology stack documentation
- Main navigation creation
**IMPL-002**: Module Documentation (per module)
- Individual module analysis
- API surface documentation
- Dependencies and relationships
- Usage examples
**IMPL-003**: Architecture Documentation
- System design patterns
- Module interaction mapping
- Data flow documentation
- Design principles
**IMPL-004**: API Documentation
- Endpoint discovery and analysis
- OpenAPI specification generation
- Authentication documentation
- Integration examples
### Task JSON Schema (5-Field Architecture)
Each documentation task uses the workflow-architecture.md 5-field schema:
- **id**: IMPL-N format
- **title**: Documentation task name
- **status**: pending|active|completed|blocked
- **meta**: { type: "documentation", agent: "@doc-generator" }
- **context**: { requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, scope }
- **flow_control**: { pre_analysis[], implementation_approach, target_files[] }
## Document Generation
### Workflow Process
**Input Analysis** → **Session Creation****IMPL_PLAN.md****.task/IMPL-NNN.json** → **TODO_LIST.md****Execute Tasks**
**Always Created**:
- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Documentation requirements and task breakdown
- **Session state**: Task references and documentation paths
**Auto-Created (based on scope)**:
- **TODO_LIST.md**: Progress tracking for documentation tasks
- **.task/IMPL-*.json**: Individual documentation tasks with flow_control
- **.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md**: Documentation analysis artifacts
**Document Structure**:
```
.workflow/
├── .active-WFS-docs-20231201-143022 # Active session marker (matches folder name)
└── WFS-docs-20231201-143022/ # Documentation session folder
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Main documentation plan
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking
├── .process/
│ └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md # Documentation analysis
└── .task/
├── IMPL-001.json # System overview task
├── IMPL-002.json # Module documentation task
├── IMPL-003.json # Architecture documentation task
└── IMPL-004.json # API documentation task
### 1. Review Planning Output
```bash
cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL_PLAN.md
cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/TODO_LIST.md
```
### Task Flow Control Templates
### 2. Execute Documentation Tasks
```bash
# Sequential (recommended)
/workflow:execute IMPL-001 # System overview first
/workflow:execute IMPL-002 # Module docs
/workflow:execute IMPL-003
/workflow:execute IMPL-004 # Architecture
/workflow:execute IMPL-005 # API docs
**System Overview Task (IMPL-001)**:
```json
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "system_architecture_analysis",
"action": "Discover system architecture and module hierarchy",
"command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
"output_to": "system_structure"
},
{
"step": "project_discovery",
"action": "Discover project structure and entry points",
"command": "bash(find . -type f -name '*.json' -o -name '*.md' -o -name 'package.json' | head -20)",
"output_to": "project_structure"
},
{
"step": "analyze_tech_stack",
"action": "Analyze technology stack and dependencies using structure analysis",
"command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"Analyze project technology stack and dependencies based on: [system_structure]\"",
"output_to": "tech_analysis"
}
],
"target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
}
# Parallel (module docs only)
/workflow:execute IMPL-002 &
/workflow:execute IMPL-003 &
wait
```
**Module Documentation Task (IMPL-002)**:
```json
"flow_control": {
"pre_analysis": [
{
"step": "load_system_structure",
"action": "Load system architecture analysis from previous task",
"command": "bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-*/IMPL-001-system_structure.output 2>/dev/null || ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)",
"output_to": "system_context"
},
{
"step": "module_analysis",
"action": "Analyze specific module structure and API within system context",
"command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"Analyze module [MODULE_NAME] structure and exported API within system: [system_context]\"",
"output_to": "module_context"
}
],
"target_files": [".workflow/docs/modules/[MODULE_NAME]/overview.md"]
}
### 3. Review Generated Documentation
```bash
ls -lah .workflow/docs/
cat .workflow/docs/README.md
```
## Analysis Templates
### Project Structure Analysis Rules
- Identify main modules and purposes
- Map directory organization patterns
- Extract entry points and configuration files
- Recognize architectural styles and design patterns
- Analyze module relationships and dependencies
- Document technology stack and requirements
### Module Analysis Rules
- Identify module boundaries and entry points
- Extract exported functions, classes, interfaces
- Document internal organization and structure
- Analyze API surfaces with types and parameters
- Map dependencies within and between modules
- Extract usage patterns and examples
### API Analysis Rules
- Classify endpoint types (REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, RPC)
- Extract request/response parameters and schemas
- Document authentication and authorization requirements
- Generate OpenAPI 3.0 specification structure
- Create comprehensive endpoint documentation
- Provide usage examples and integration guides
### 4. TodoWrite Progress
- Planning: All tasks `pending`
- Execution: `pending``in_progress``completed`
- Real-time status updates via TodoWrite
## Error Handling
- **Invalid document type**: Clear error message with valid options
- **Module not found**: Skip missing modules with warning
- **Analysis failures**: Fall back to file-based analysis
- **Permission issues**: Clear guidance on directory access
- **No modules found**: Create only IMPL-001 (system overview)
- **Scope path invalid**: Show error and exit
- **Active session exists**: Prompt to complete or pause
- **Tool unavailable**: Fall back to gemini
## Key Benefits
### Structured Documentation Process
- **Task-based approach**: Documentation broken into manageable, trackable tasks
- **Flow control integration**: Systematic analysis ensures completeness
- **Progress visibility**: TODO_LIST.md provides clear completion status
- **Quality assurance**: Each task has defined acceptance criteria
### Clear Separation of Concerns
- **Planning**: Session creation, task decomposition (this command)
- **Execution**: Content generation, quality assurance (doc-generator agent)
### Workflow Integration
- **Planning foundation**: Documentation provides context for implementation planning
- **Execution consistency**: Same task execution model as implementation
- **Context accumulation**: Documentation builds comprehensive project understanding
### Scalable Task Management
- Independent, self-contained tasks
- Parallelizable module documentation
- Clear dependencies (architecture needs modules)
## Usage Examples
### Template-Driven Consistency
- All documentation follows standard templates
- Reusable and maintainable
- Easy to update standards
### Complete Documentation Workflow
```bash
# Step 1: Create documentation plan and tasks
/workflow:docs all
# Step 2: Execute documentation tasks (after planning)
/workflow:execute IMPL-001 # System overview
/workflow:execute IMPL-002 # Module documentation
/workflow:execute IMPL-003 # Architecture documentation
/workflow:execute IMPL-004 # API documentation
```
The system creates structured documentation tasks with proper session management, task.json files, and integration with the broader workflow system for systematic and trackable documentation generation.
### Full Context for Execution
- Each task JSON contains complete instructions
- flow_control defines exact analysis steps
- Tool selection for flexibility

View File

@@ -1,258 +0,0 @@
---
name: workflow:status
description: Generate on-demand views from JSON task data
usage: /workflow:status [task-id] [--format=<format>] [--validate]
argument-hint: [optional: task-id, format, validation]
examples:
- /workflow:status
- /workflow:status impl-1
- /workflow:status --format=hierarchy
- /workflow:status --validate
---
# Workflow Status Command (/workflow:status)
## Overview
Generates on-demand views from JSON task data. No synchronization needed - all views are calculated from the current state of JSON files.
## Core Principles
**Data Source:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
## Key Features
### Pure View Generation
- **No Sync**: Views are generated, not synchronized
- **Always Current**: Reads latest JSON data every time
- **No Persistence**: Views are temporary, not saved
- **Single Source**: All data comes from JSON files only
### Multiple View Formats
- **Overview** (default): Current tasks and status
- **Hierarchy**: Task relationships and structure
- **Details**: Specific task information
## Usage
### Default Overview
```bash
/workflow:status
```
Generates current workflow overview:
```markdown
# Workflow Overview
**Session**: WFS-user-auth
**Phase**: IMPLEMENT
**Type**: medium
## Active Tasks
- [⚠️] impl-1: Build authentication module (code-developer)
- [⚠️] impl-2: Setup user management (code-developer)
## Completed Tasks
- [✅] impl-0: Project setup
## Stats
- **Total**: 8 tasks
- **Completed**: 3
- **Active**: 2
- **Remaining**: 3
```
### Specific Task View
```bash
/workflow:status impl-1
```
Shows detailed task information:
```markdown
# Task: impl-1
**Title**: Build authentication module
**Status**: active
**Agent**: @code-developer
**Type**: feature
## Context
- **Requirements**: JWT authentication, OAuth2 support
- **Scope**: src/auth/*, tests/auth/*
- **Acceptance**: Module handles JWT tokens, OAuth2 flow implemented
- **Inherited From**: WFS-user-auth
## Relations
- **Parent**: none
- **Subtasks**: impl-1.1, impl-1.2
- **Dependencies**: impl-0
## Execution
- **Attempts**: 0
- **Last Attempt**: never
## Metadata
- **Created**: 2025-09-05T10:30:00Z
- **Updated**: 2025-09-05T10:35:00Z
```
### Hierarchy View
```bash
/workflow:status --format=hierarchy
```
Shows task relationships:
```markdown
# Task Hierarchy
## Main Tasks
- impl-0: Project setup ✅
- impl-1: Build authentication module ⚠️
- impl-1.1: Design auth schema
- impl-1.2: Implement auth logic
- impl-2: Setup user management ⚠️
## Dependencies
- impl-1 → depends on → impl-0
- impl-2 → depends on → impl-1
```
## View Generation Process
### Data Loading
```pseudo
function generate_workflow_status(task_id, format):
// Load all current data
session = load_workflow_session()
all_tasks = load_all_task_json_files()
// Filter if specific task requested
if task_id:
target_task = find_task(all_tasks, task_id)
return generate_task_detail_view(target_task)
// Generate requested format
switch format:
case 'hierarchy':
return generate_hierarchy_view(all_tasks)
default:
return generate_overview(session, all_tasks)
```
### Real-Time Calculation
- **Task Counts**: Calculated from JSON file status fields
- **Relationships**: Built from JSON relations fields
- **Status**: Read directly from current JSON state
## Validation Mode
### Basic Validation
```bash
/workflow:status --validate
```
Performs integrity checks:
```markdown
# Validation Results
## JSON File Validation
✅ All task JSON files are valid
✅ Session file is valid and readable
## Relationship Validation
✅ All parent-child relationships are valid
✅ All dependencies reference existing tasks
✅ No circular dependencies detected
## Hierarchy Validation
✅ Task hierarchy within depth limits (max 3 levels)
✅ All subtask references are bidirectional
## Issues Found
⚠️ impl-3: No subtasks defined (expected for leaf task)
**Status**: All systems operational
```
### Validation Checks
- **JSON Schema**: All files parse correctly
- **References**: All task IDs exist
- **Hierarchy**: Parent-child relationships are valid
- **Dependencies**: No circular dependencies
- **Depth**: Task hierarchy within limits
## Error Handling
### Missing Files
```bash
❌ Session file not found
→ Initialize new workflow session? (y/n)
❌ Task impl-5 not found
→ Available tasks: impl-1, impl-2, impl-3, impl-4
```
### Invalid Data
```bash
❌ Invalid JSON in impl-2.json
→ Cannot generate view for impl-2
→ Repair file manually or recreate task
⚠️ Circular dependency detected: impl-1 → impl-2 → impl-1
→ Task relationships may be incorrect
```
## Performance Benefits
### Fast Generation
- **No File Writes**: Only reads JSON files
- **No Sync Logic**: No complex synchronization
- **Instant Results**: Generate views on demand
- **No Conflicts**: No state consistency issues
### Scalability
- **Large Task Sets**: Handles hundreds of tasks efficiently
- **Complex Hierarchies**: No performance degradation
- **Concurrent Access**: Multiple views can be generated simultaneously
## Integration
### Workflow Integration
- Use after task creation to see current state
- Use for debugging task relationships
### Command Integration
```bash
# Common workflow
/task:create "New feature"
/workflow:status # Check current state
/task:breakdown impl-1
/workflow:status --format=hierarchy # View new structure
/task:execute impl-1.1
```
## Output Formats
### Supported Formats
- `overview` (default): General workflow status
- `hierarchy`: Task relationships
- `tasks`: Simple task list
- `details`: Comprehensive information
### Custom Filtering
```bash
# Show only active tasks
/workflow:status --format=tasks --filter=active
# Show completed tasks only
/workflow:status --format=tasks --filter=completed
# Show tasks for specific agent
/workflow:status --format=tasks --agent=@code-developer
```
## Related Commands
- `/task:create` - Create tasks (generates JSON data)
- `/task:execute` - Execute tasks (updates JSON data)
- `/task:breakdown` - Create subtasks (generates more JSON data)
- `/workflow:vibe` - Coordinate agents (uses workflow status for coordination)
This workflow status system provides instant, accurate views of workflow state without any synchronization complexity or performance overhead.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
# API-Level Documentation Template
Generate comprehensive API documentation following this structure:
## Overview
[Brief description of the API's purpose and capabilities]
## Authentication
### Authentication Method
[e.g., JWT, OAuth2, API Keys]
### Obtaining Credentials
```bash
# Example authentication flow
```
### Using Credentials
```http
GET /api/resource HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer <token>
```
---
## Base URL
```
Production: https://api.example.com/v1
Staging: https://staging.api.example.com/v1
```
## Common Response Codes
| Code | Description |
|------|-------------|
| 200 | Success |
| 201 | Created |
| 400 | Bad Request |
| 401 | Unauthorized |
| 403 | Forbidden |
| 404 | Not Found |
| 500 | Internal Server Error |
---
## Endpoints
### Resource: Users
#### GET /users
**Description**: Retrieves a paginated list of users.
**Query Parameters**:
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
| `limit` | number | No | Number of results (default: 20, max: 100) |
| `offset` | number | No | Pagination offset (default: 0) |
| `sort` | string | No | Sort field (e.g., `name`, `-created_at`) |
**Example Request**:
```http
GET /users?limit=10&offset=0&sort=-created_at HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer <token>
```
**Response (200 OK)**:
```json
{
"data": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"created_at": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z"
}
],
"pagination": {
"total": 100,
"limit": 10,
"offset": 0
}
}
```
**Error Response (401 Unauthorized)**:
```json
{
"error": {
"code": "UNAUTHORIZED",
"message": "Invalid or expired token"
}
}
```
---
#### GET /users/:id
**Description**: Retrieves a single user by ID.
**Path Parameters**:
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| `id` | number | User ID |
**Example Request**:
```http
GET /users/123 HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer <token>
```
**Response (200 OK)**:
```json
{
"id": 123,
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"created_at": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"updated_at": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
```
---
#### POST /users
**Description**: Creates a new user.
**Request Body**:
```json
{
"name": "Jane Smith",
"email": "jane@example.com",
"password": "securePassword123"
}
```
**Validation Rules**:
- `name`: Required, 2-100 characters
- `email`: Required, valid email format, must be unique
- `password`: Required, minimum 8 characters
**Response (201 Created)**:
```json
{
"id": 124,
"name": "Jane Smith",
"email": "jane@example.com",
"created_at": "2024-01-20T12:00:00Z"
}
```
**Error Response (400 Bad Request)**:
```json
{
"error": {
"code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
"message": "Validation failed",
"details": [
{
"field": "email",
"message": "Email already exists"
}
]
}
}
```
---
#### PUT /users/:id
**Description**: Updates an existing user.
**Path Parameters**:
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| `id` | number | User ID |
**Request Body** (all fields optional):
```json
{
"name": "Jane Doe",
"email": "jane.doe@example.com"
}
```
**Response (200 OK)**:
```json
{
"id": 124,
"name": "Jane Doe",
"email": "jane.doe@example.com",
"updated_at": "2024-01-21T09:15:00Z"
}
```
---
#### DELETE /users/:id
**Description**: Deletes a user.
**Path Parameters**:
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| `id` | number | User ID |
**Response (204 No Content)**:
[Empty response body]
---
## Rate Limiting
- **Limit**: 1000 requests per hour per API key
- **Headers**:
- `X-RateLimit-Limit`: Total requests allowed
- `X-RateLimit-Remaining`: Requests remaining
- `X-RateLimit-Reset`: Unix timestamp when limit resets
---
## SDKs and Client Libraries
- [JavaScript/TypeScript SDK](./sdks/javascript.md)
- [Python SDK](./sdks/python.md)
---
## Webhooks
[Description of webhook system if applicable]
---
## Changelog
### v1.1.0 (2024-01-20)
- Added user sorting functionality
- Improved error messages
### v1.0.0 (2024-01-01)
- Initial API release
---
**API Version**: 1.1.0
**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
**Support**: api-support@example.com

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
# Module-Level Documentation Template
Generate detailed module documentation following this structure:
## 1. Purpose and Responsibilities
[What this module does, its boundaries, and its role in the larger system]
## 2. Internal Architecture
- **Key Components**:
- [Component 1]: [Description and responsibility]
- [Component 2]: [Description and responsibility]
- **Data Flow**: [How data moves through the module, with diagrams if applicable]
- **Core Logic**: [Explanation of the main business logic and algorithms]
- **State Management**: [How state is managed within the module]
## 3. Public API / Interface
### Exported Functions
```typescript
/**
* Function description
* @param param1 - Parameter description
* @returns Return value description
*/
export function exampleFunction(param1: Type): ReturnType;
```
### Exported Classes
```typescript
/**
* Class description
*/
export class ExampleClass {
// Public methods and properties
}
```
### Usage Examples
```typescript
import { exampleFunction } from './module';
// Example 1: Basic usage
const result = exampleFunction(input);
// Example 2: Advanced usage
// ...
```
## 4. Dependencies
### Internal Dependencies
- **[Module A]**: [Why this dependency exists, what it provides]
- **[Module B]**: [Purpose of dependency]
### External Dependencies
- **[Library 1]** (`version`): [Purpose and usage]
- **[Library 2]** (`version`): [Purpose and usage]
## 5. Configuration
### Environment Variables
- `ENV_VAR_NAME`: [Description, default value]
### Configuration Options
```typescript
interface ModuleConfig {
option1: Type; // Description
option2: Type; // Description
}
```
## 6. Testing
### Running Tests
```bash
npm test -- module-name
```
### Test Coverage
- Unit tests: [Coverage percentage or key test files]
- Integration tests: [Coverage or test scenarios]
## 7. Common Use Cases
1. **Use Case 1**: [Description and code example]
2. **Use Case 2**: [Description and code example]
## 8. Troubleshooting
### Common Issues
- **Issue 1**: [Description and solution]
- **Issue 2**: [Description and solution]
---
**Module Path**: [File path]
**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
**Owner/Maintainer**: [Team or individual]

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
# Project-Level Documentation Template
Generate comprehensive project documentation following this structure:
## 1. Overview
- **Purpose**: [High-level mission and goals of the project]
- **Target Audience**: [Primary users, developers, stakeholders]
- **Key Features**: [List of major functionalities and capabilities]
## 2. System Architecture
- **Architectural Style**: [e.g., Monolith, Microservices, Layered, Event-Driven]
- **Core Components**: [Diagram or list of major system parts and their interactions]
- **Technology Stack**:
- Languages: [Programming languages used]
- Frameworks: [Key frameworks and libraries]
- Databases: [Data storage solutions]
- Infrastructure: [Deployment and hosting]
- **Design Principles**: [Guiding principles like SOLID, DRY, separation of concerns]
## 3. Getting Started
- **Prerequisites**: [Required software, tools, versions]
- **Installation**:
```bash
# Installation commands
```
- **Configuration**: [Environment setup, config files]
- **Running the Project**:
```bash
# Startup commands
```
## 4. Development Workflow
- **Branching Strategy**: [e.g., GitFlow, trunk-based]
- **Coding Standards**: [Style guide, linting rules]
- **Testing**:
```bash
# Test commands
```
- **Build & Deployment**: [CI/CD pipeline overview]
## 5. Project Structure
```
project-root/
├── src/ # [Description]
├── tests/ # [Description]
├── docs/ # [Description]
└── config/ # [Description]
```
## 6. Navigation
- [Module Documentation](./modules/)
- [API Reference](./api/)
- [Architecture Details](./architecture/)
- [Contributing Guidelines](./CONTRIBUTING.md)
---
**Last Updated**: [Auto-generated timestamp]
**Documentation Version**: [Project version]

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,534 @@
---
name: design-tokens-schema
description: Design tokens JSON schema specification for UI design workflow
type: specification
---
# Design Tokens Schema Specification
## Overview
Standardized JSON schema for design tokens used in `/workflow:design/*` commands. Ensures consistency across style extraction, consolidation, and UI generation phases.
## Core Principles
1. **OKLCH Color Format**: All colors use OKLCH color space for perceptual uniformity
2. **Semantic Naming**: User-centric token names (brand-primary, surface-elevated, not color-1, bg-2)
3. **rem-Based Sizing**: All spacing and typography use rem units for scalability
4. **Comprehensive Coverage**: Complete token set for production-ready design systems
5. **Accessibility First**: WCAG AA compliance validated and documented
## Full Schema
```json
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"title": "Design Tokens",
"description": "Design token definitions for UI design workflow",
"type": "object",
"required": ["colors", "typography", "spacing", "border_radius", "shadow"],
"properties": {
"meta": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"version": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"},
"generated_at": {"type": "string", "format": "date-time"},
"session_id": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^WFS-"},
"description": {"type": "string"}
}
},
"colors": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["brand", "surface", "semantic", "text"],
"properties": {
"brand": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Brand identity colors",
"required": ["primary", "secondary"],
"properties": {
"primary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"secondary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"accent": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
}
},
"surface": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Surface and background colors",
"required": ["background", "elevated"],
"properties": {
"background": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"elevated": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"sunken": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"overlay": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
}
},
"semantic": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Semantic state colors",
"required": ["success", "warning", "error", "info"],
"properties": {
"success": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"warning": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"error": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"info": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
}
},
"text": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Text colors with WCAG AA validated contrast",
"required": ["primary", "secondary"],
"properties": {
"primary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"secondary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"tertiary": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"inverse": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"disabled": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
}
},
"border": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Border and divider colors",
"properties": {
"subtle": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"default": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"},
"strong": {"$ref": "#/definitions/color"}
}
}
}
},
"typography": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["font_family", "font_size", "line_height", "font_weight"],
"properties": {
"font_family": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["heading", "body"],
"properties": {
"heading": {"type": "string"},
"body": {"type": "string"},
"mono": {"type": "string"}
}
},
"font_size": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["xs", "sm", "base", "lg", "xl", "2xl", "3xl", "4xl"],
"properties": {
"xs": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"sm": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"base": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"lg": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"2xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"3xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"4xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"5xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"}
}
},
"line_height": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["tight", "normal", "relaxed"],
"properties": {
"tight": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$"},
"normal": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$"},
"relaxed": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?$"}
}
},
"font_weight": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"light": {"type": "integer", "enum": [300]},
"normal": {"type": "integer", "enum": [400]},
"medium": {"type": "integer", "enum": [500]},
"semibold": {"type": "integer", "enum": [600]},
"bold": {"type": "integer", "enum": [700]}
}
}
}
},
"spacing": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Spacing scale (rem-based)",
"required": ["0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "6", "8"],
"patternProperties": {
"^\\d+$": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"}
}
},
"border_radius": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["none", "sm", "md", "lg", "full"],
"properties": {
"none": {"type": "string", "const": "0"},
"sm": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"md": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"lg": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"2xl": {"$ref": "#/definitions/size_rem"},
"full": {"type": "string", "const": "9999px"}
}
},
"shadow": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["sm", "md", "lg"],
"properties": {
"none": {"type": "string", "const": "none"},
"sm": {"type": "string"},
"md": {"type": "string"},
"lg": {"type": "string"},
"xl": {"type": "string"},
"2xl": {"type": "string"}
}
},
"breakpoint": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Responsive breakpoints",
"properties": {
"sm": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
"md": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
"lg": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
"xl": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"},
"2xl": {"type": "string", "pattern": "^\\d+px$"}
}
},
"accessibility": {
"type": "object",
"description": "WCAG AA compliance data",
"properties": {
"contrast_ratios": {
"type": "object",
"patternProperties": {
".*": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"background": {"type": "string"},
"foreground": {"type": "string"},
"ratio": {"type": "number"},
"wcag_aa_pass": {"type": "boolean"},
"wcag_aaa_pass": {"type": "boolean"}
}
}
}
}
}
}
},
"definitions": {
"color": {
"type": "string",
"pattern": "^oklch\\(\\s*\\d+(\\.\\d+)?\\s+\\d+(\\.\\d+)?\\s+\\d+(\\.\\d+)?\\s*(\\/\\s*\\d+(\\.\\d+)?)?\\s*\\)$",
"description": "OKLCH color format: oklch(L C H / A)"
},
"size_rem": {
"type": "string",
"pattern": "^\\d+(\\.\\d+)?rem$",
"description": "rem-based size value"
}
}
}
```
## Example: Complete Design Tokens
```json
{
"meta": {
"version": "1.0.0",
"generated_at": "2025-10-05T15:30:00Z",
"session_id": "WFS-auth-dashboard",
"description": "Modern minimalist design system with high contrast"
},
"colors": {
"brand": {
"primary": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
"secondary": "oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / 1)",
"accent": "oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / 1)"
},
"surface": {
"background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
"elevated": "oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / 1)",
"sunken": "oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / 1)",
"overlay": "oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.5)"
},
"semantic": {
"success": "oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / 1)",
"warning": "oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / 1)",
"error": "oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / 1)",
"info": "oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / 1)"
},
"text": {
"primary": "oklch(0.20 0.02 270 / 1)",
"secondary": "oklch(0.45 0.02 270 / 1)",
"tertiary": "oklch(0.60 0.02 270 / 1)",
"inverse": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
"disabled": "oklch(0.70 0.01 270 / 0.5)"
},
"border": {
"subtle": "oklch(0.90 0.01 270 / 1)",
"default": "oklch(0.80 0.02 270 / 1)",
"strong": "oklch(0.60 0.05 270 / 1)"
}
},
"typography": {
"font_family": {
"heading": "Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, sans-serif",
"body": "Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, sans-serif",
"mono": "Fira Code, Consolas, monospace"
},
"font_size": {
"xs": "0.75rem",
"sm": "0.875rem",
"base": "1rem",
"lg": "1.125rem",
"xl": "1.25rem",
"2xl": "1.5rem",
"3xl": "1.875rem",
"4xl": "2.25rem",
"5xl": "3rem"
},
"line_height": {
"tight": "1.25",
"normal": "1.5",
"relaxed": "1.75"
},
"font_weight": {
"light": 300,
"normal": 400,
"medium": 500,
"semibold": 600,
"bold": 700
}
},
"spacing": {
"0": "0",
"1": "0.25rem",
"2": "0.5rem",
"3": "0.75rem",
"4": "1rem",
"5": "1.25rem",
"6": "1.5rem",
"8": "2rem",
"10": "2.5rem",
"12": "3rem",
"16": "4rem",
"20": "5rem",
"24": "6rem"
},
"border_radius": {
"none": "0",
"sm": "0.25rem",
"md": "0.5rem",
"lg": "0.75rem",
"xl": "1rem",
"2xl": "1.5rem",
"full": "9999px"
},
"shadow": {
"none": "none",
"sm": "0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
"md": "0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06)",
"lg": "0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)",
"xl": "0 20px 25px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.15), 0 10px 10px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.04)",
"2xl": "0 25px 50px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.25)"
},
"breakpoint": {
"sm": "640px",
"md": "768px",
"lg": "1024px",
"xl": "1280px",
"2xl": "1536px"
},
"accessibility": {
"contrast_ratios": {
"text_primary_on_background": {
"background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
"foreground": "oklch(0.20 0.02 270 / 1)",
"ratio": 14.2,
"wcag_aa_pass": true,
"wcag_aaa_pass": true
},
"brand_primary_on_background": {
"background": "oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1)",
"foreground": "oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1)",
"ratio": 6.8,
"wcag_aa_pass": true,
"wcag_aaa_pass": false
}
}
}
}
```
## CSS Custom Properties Generation
Design tokens should be converted to CSS custom properties for use in generated UI:
```css
:root {
/* Brand Colors */
--color-brand-primary: oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / 1);
--color-brand-secondary: oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / 1);
--color-brand-accent: oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / 1);
/* Surface Colors */
--color-surface-background: oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / 1);
--color-surface-elevated: oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / 1);
--color-surface-sunken: oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / 1);
/* Semantic Colors */
--color-semantic-success: oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / 1);
--color-semantic-warning: oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / 1);
--color-semantic-error: oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / 1);
--color-semantic-info: oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / 1);
/* Text Colors */
--color-text-primary: oklch(0.20 0.02 270 / 1);
--color-text-secondary: oklch(0.45 0.02 270 / 1);
--color-text-tertiary: oklch(0.60 0.02 270 / 1);
/* Typography */
--font-family-heading: Inter, system-ui, sans-serif;
--font-family-body: Inter, system-ui, sans-serif;
--font-family-mono: Fira Code, Consolas, monospace;
--font-size-xs: 0.75rem;
--font-size-sm: 0.875rem;
--font-size-base: 1rem;
--font-size-lg: 1.125rem;
--font-size-xl: 1.25rem;
--font-size-2xl: 1.5rem;
--font-size-3xl: 1.875rem;
--font-size-4xl: 2.25rem;
--line-height-tight: 1.25;
--line-height-normal: 1.5;
--line-height-relaxed: 1.75;
/* Spacing */
--spacing-0: 0;
--spacing-1: 0.25rem;
--spacing-2: 0.5rem;
--spacing-3: 0.75rem;
--spacing-4: 1rem;
--spacing-6: 1.5rem;
--spacing-8: 2rem;
--spacing-12: 3rem;
--spacing-16: 4rem;
/* Border Radius */
--border-radius-none: 0;
--border-radius-sm: 0.25rem;
--border-radius-md: 0.5rem;
--border-radius-lg: 0.75rem;
--border-radius-xl: 1rem;
--border-radius-full: 9999px;
/* Shadows */
--shadow-sm: 0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05);
--shadow-md: 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06);
--shadow-lg: 0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05);
}
```
## Tailwind Configuration Generation
```javascript
// tailwind.config.js
module.exports = {
theme: {
extend: {
colors: {
brand: {
primary: 'oklch(0.45 0.20 270 / <alpha-value>)',
secondary: 'oklch(0.60 0.15 200 / <alpha-value>)',
accent: 'oklch(0.65 0.18 30 / <alpha-value>)'
},
surface: {
background: 'oklch(0.98 0.01 270 / <alpha-value>)',
elevated: 'oklch(1.00 0.00 0 / <alpha-value>)',
sunken: 'oklch(0.95 0.02 270 / <alpha-value>)'
},
semantic: {
success: 'oklch(0.55 0.15 150 / <alpha-value>)',
warning: 'oklch(0.70 0.18 60 / <alpha-value>)',
error: 'oklch(0.50 0.20 20 / <alpha-value>)',
info: 'oklch(0.60 0.15 240 / <alpha-value>)'
}
},
fontFamily: {
heading: ['Inter', 'system-ui', 'sans-serif'],
body: ['Inter', 'system-ui', 'sans-serif'],
mono: ['Fira Code', 'Consolas', 'monospace']
},
fontSize: {
'xs': '0.75rem',
'sm': '0.875rem',
'base': '1rem',
'lg': '1.125rem',
'xl': '1.25rem',
'2xl': '1.5rem',
'3xl': '1.875rem',
'4xl': '2.25rem'
},
spacing: {
'1': '0.25rem',
'2': '0.5rem',
'3': '0.75rem',
'4': '1rem',
'6': '1.5rem',
'8': '2rem',
'12': '3rem',
'16': '4rem'
},
borderRadius: {
'sm': '0.25rem',
'md': '0.5rem',
'lg': '0.75rem',
'xl': '1rem',
'2xl': '1.5rem'
},
boxShadow: {
'sm': '0 1px 2px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)',
'md': '0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.07), 0 2px 4px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.06)',
'lg': '0 10px 15px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.1), 0 4px 6px oklch(0.00 0.00 0 / 0.05)'
}
}
}
}
```
## Validation Requirements
### Color Validation
- All colors MUST use OKLCH format
- Alpha channel optional (defaults to 1)
- Lightness: 0-1 (0% to 100%)
- Chroma: 0-0.4 (typical range, can exceed for vibrant colors)
- Hue: 0-360 (degrees)
### Accessibility Validation
- Text on background: minimum 4.5:1 contrast (WCAG AA)
- Large text (18pt+ or 14pt+ bold): minimum 3:1 contrast
- UI components: minimum 3:1 contrast
- Non-text focus indicators: minimum 3:1 contrast
### Consistency Validation
- Spacing scale maintains consistent ratio (e.g., 1.5x or 2x progression)
- Typography scale follows modular scale principles
- Border radius values progress logically
- Shadow layers increase in offset and blur systematically
## Usage in Commands
### style-extract Output
Generates initial `design-tokens.json` from visual analysis
### style-consolidate Output
Finalizes validated `design-tokens.json` with accessibility data
### ui-generate Input
Reads `design-tokens.json` to generate CSS custom properties
### design-update Integration
References `design-tokens.json` path in synthesis-specification.md
## Version History
- **1.0.0**: Initial schema with OKLCH colors, semantic naming, WCAG AA validation

View File

@@ -266,28 +266,73 @@ All workflows use the same file structure definition regardless of complexity. *
#### Complete Structure Reference
```
.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/
├── workflow-session.json # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
├── [.brainstorming/] # Optional brainstorming phase (created when needed)
├── [.chat/] # CLI interaction sessions (created when analysis is run)
│ ├── chat-*.md # Saved chat sessions
── analysis-*.md # Analysis results
├── [.process/] # Planning analysis results (created by /workflow:plan)
── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md # Analysis results and planning artifacts
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Planning document (REQUIRED)
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking (REQUIRED)
── [.summaries/] # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
├── IMPL-*-summary.md # Main task summaries
── IMPL-*.*-summary.md # Subtask summaries
└── .task/ # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
├── IMPL-*.json # Main task definitions
└── IMPL-*.*.json # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
.workflow/
├── [.scratchpad/] # Non-session-specific outputs (created when needed)
│ ├── analyze-*-[timestamp].md # One-off analysis results
├── chat-*-[timestamp].md # Standalone chat sessions
│ ├── plan-*-[timestamp].md # Ad-hoc planning notes
── bug-index-*-[timestamp].md # Quick bug analyses
│ ├── code-analysis-*-[timestamp].md # Standalone code analysis
── execute-*-[timestamp].md # Ad-hoc implementation logs
│ └── codex-execute-*-[timestamp].md # Multi-stage execution logs
── WFS-[topic-slug]/
├── workflow-session.json # Session metadata and state (REQUIRED)
── [.brainstorming/] # Optional brainstorming phase (created when needed)
├── [.chat/] # CLI interaction sessions (created when analysis is run)
│ ├── chat-*.md # Saved chat sessions
│ └── analysis-*.md # Analysis results
├── [.process/] # Planning analysis results (created by /workflow:plan)
│ └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md # Analysis results and planning artifacts
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Planning document (REQUIRED)
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking (REQUIRED)
├── [.summaries/] # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
│ ├── IMPL-*-summary.md # Main task summaries
│ └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md # Subtask summaries
└── .task/ # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
├── IMPL-*.json # Main task definitions
└── IMPL-*.*.json # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
```
#### Creation Strategy
- **Initial Setup**: Create only `workflow-session.json`, `IMPL_PLAN.md`, `TODO_LIST.md`, and `.task/` directory
- **On-Demand Creation**: Other directories created when first needed
- **Dynamic Files**: Subtask JSON files created during task decomposition
- **Scratchpad Usage**: `.scratchpad/` created when CLI commands run without active session
#### Scratchpad Directory (.scratchpad/)
**Purpose**: Centralized location for non-session-specific CLI outputs
**When to Use**:
1. **No Active Session**: CLI analysis/chat commands run without an active workflow session
2. **Unrelated Analysis**: Quick analysis not related to current active session
3. **Exploratory Work**: Ad-hoc investigation before creating formal workflow
4. **One-Off Queries**: Standalone questions or debugging without workflow context
**Output Routing Logic**:
- **IF** active session exists AND command is session-relevant:
- Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/[command]-[timestamp].md`
- **ELSE** (no session OR one-off analysis):
- Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/[command]-[description]-[timestamp].md`
**File Naming Pattern**: `[command-type]-[brief-description]-[timestamp].md`
**Examples**:
*Analysis Commands (read-only):*
- `/cli:analyze "security"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143022.md`
- `/cli:chat "build process"` (unrelated to active session) → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
- `/cli:mode:plan "feature idea"` (exploratory) → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143110.md`
- `/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace auth flow"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-auth-flow-20250105-143130.md`
*Implementation Commands (⚠️ modifies code):*
- `/cli:execute "implement JWT auth"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143200.md`
- `/cli:codex-execute "refactor API layer"` (no session) → `.scratchpad/codex-execute-api-refactor-20250105-143230.md`
**Maintenance**:
- Periodically review and clean up old scratchpad files
- Promote useful analyses to formal workflow sessions if needed
- No automatic cleanup - manual management recommended
### File Naming Conventions

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,201 @@ All notable changes to Claude Code Workflow (CCW) will be documented in this fil
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
## [3.5.0] - 2025-10-06
### 🎨 UI Design Workflow with Triple Vision Analysis
This release introduces a comprehensive UI design workflow system with triple vision analysis capabilities, interactive user checkpoints, and zero agent overhead for improved performance.
#### Added
**New UI Design Workflow System**:
- **`/workflow:design:auto`**: Semi-autonomous UI design workflow orchestrator
- Interactive checkpoints for user style selection and prototype confirmation
- Optional batch task generation with `--batch-plan` flag
- Pause-and-continue pattern at critical decision points
- Automatic progression between phases after user input
- Support for multiple UI variants per page (`--variants` parameter)
**Triple Vision Analysis Architecture**:
- **Phase 1: Claude Code Vision Analysis**: Quick initial visual analysis using native Read tool
- **Phase 2: Gemini Vision Analysis**: Deep semantic understanding of design intent
- **Phase 3: Codex Vision Analysis**: Structured pattern recognition with `-i` parameter
- **Phase 4: Consensus Synthesis**: Weighted combination by main Claude agent
- **Synthesis Strategy**:
- Color system: Consensus with Codex precision preference
- Typography: Gemini semantic + Codex measurements
- Spacing: Cross-validation across all three sources
- Design philosophy: Weighted with Gemini highest priority
- Conflict resolution: Majority vote or synthesis-specification.md context
**Individual Design Commands**:
- **`/workflow:design:style-extract`**: Extract design styles from reference images
- Triple vision analysis (Claude Code + Gemini + Codex)
- Generates `semantic_style_analysis.json`, `design-tokens.json`, `style-cards.json`
- Outputs multiple style variant cards for user selection
- Direct bash execution (no agent wrappers)
- **`/workflow:design:style-consolidate`**: Consolidate selected style variants
- Validates and merges design tokens
- Generates finalized `design-tokens.json`, `style-guide.md`, `tailwind.config.js`
- WCAG AA compliance validation
- Token coverage ≥90% requirement
- **`/workflow:design:ui-generate`**: Generate production-ready UI prototypes
- Token-driven HTML/CSS generation with Codex
- Support for `--style-overrides` parameter for runtime customization
- Generates `{page}-variant-{n}.html`, `{page}-variant-{n}.css` per page
- Semantic HTML5 with ARIA attributes
- Responsive design with token-based breakpoints
- **`/workflow:design:design-update`**: Integrate design system into brainstorming
- Updates `synthesis-specification.md` with UI/UX guidelines section
- Creates/updates `ui-designer/style-guide.md`
- Makes design tokens available for task generation phase
**Interactive Checkpoint System**:
- **Checkpoint 1 (After style-extract)**: User selects preferred style variants
- Command: `/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-xxx --variants "variant-1,variant-3"`
- Workflow pauses until user runs consolidation command
- **Checkpoint 2 (After ui-generate)**: User confirms selected prototypes
- Command: `/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-xxx --selected-prototypes "page-variant-1,page-variant-2"`
- Workflow pauses until user runs design-update command
**Design System Features**:
- **OKLCH Color Format**: Perceptually uniform color space for design tokens
- **W3C Design Tokens Compatibility**: Standard-compliant token format
- **Style Override Mechanism**: Runtime token merging using jq
- **Batch Task Generation**: Automatic `/workflow:plan` invocation for each page
- **Accessibility Validation**: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance checks
#### Changed
**Agent Architecture Simplification**:
- **Removed agent wrappers** from `style-extract` and `ui-generate` commands
- Previously used `Task(conceptual-planning-agent)` for simple bash execution
- Now executes `gemini-wrapper` and `codex` commands directly via Bash tool
- Reduced execution overhead and complexity
- Preserved all functionality while improving performance
**Command Execution Pattern**:
- **Direct Bash Execution**: All CLI tools now use direct bash commands
- Gemini Vision: `bash(gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "...")`
- Codex Vision: `bash(codex -i {images} --full-auto exec "..." -s danger-full-access)`
- Codex Token Generation: `bash(codex --full-auto exec "..." -s danger-full-access)`
- No intermediate agent layers
**Workflow Integration**:
- Design phase now optional but recommended for UI-heavy projects
- Seamless integration with existing brainstorming → planning → execution flow
- Design artifacts automatically discovered by `task-generate` if present
- UI tasks automatically include `load_design_tokens` in flow_control
**Updated Documentation**:
- **README.md**: Added UI Design Workflow section in Getting Started
- **README_CN.md**: Chinese documentation updated with design workflow
- **Command Reference**: Added 5 new `/workflow:design:*` commands
- **Phase Renumbering**: Shifted phases to accommodate new Phase 2 (UI Design)
#### Benefits
**User Experience**:
- 🎨 **Visual Validation**: Users confirm design before implementation starts
- ⏸️ **Interactive Control**: Critical design decisions require explicit user approval
- 👁️ **Comprehensive Analysis**: Three AI vision sources provide robust style extraction
- 🎯 **Zero Waiting**: Direct bash execution eliminates agent overhead
- 📦 **Automation Ready**: Optional batch task generation accelerates workflow
**Code Quality**:
- 🔒 **Token Enforcement**: 100% CSS values use custom properties (verified)
-**Accessibility**: WCAG AA validated at design phase
- 🎨 **Consistency**: Single source of truth for visual design (design-tokens.json)
- 🧪 **Production Ready**: Semantic HTML5, responsive, accessible prototypes
**Development Workflow**:
- 🔄 **Seamless Integration**: Optional design phase fits between brainstorming and planning
- 🚀 **Backward Compatible**: Existing workflows unaffected if design phase skipped
- 📊 **Better Planning**: Design system context improves task generation quality
- 🎯 **Focused Implementation**: Developers work from validated prototypes and tokens
#### Technical Details
**Triple Vision Analysis Flow**:
```
Reference Images
Phase 2: Claude Code (Read tool) → claude_vision_analysis.json
Phase 3: Gemini Vision (gemini-wrapper) → gemini_vision_analysis.json
Phase 4: Codex Vision (codex -i) → codex_vision_analysis.json
Phase 5: Main Claude Synthesis → semantic_style_analysis.json
Phase 6: Codex Token Generation → design-tokens.json, style-cards.json
```
**Checkpoint Workflow Pattern**:
```
User: /workflow:design:auto --session WFS-xxx --images "refs/*.png" --pages "dashboard,auth"
Phase 1: style-extract (automatic)
↓ [CHECKPOINT 1: User selects style variants]
User: /workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-xxx --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
Phase 3: ui-generate (automatic after Phase 2)
↓ [CHECKPOINT 2: User confirms prototypes]
User: /workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-xxx --selected-prototypes "dashboard-variant-1,auth-variant-2"
Phase 5: batch-plan (optional, automatic if --batch-plan flag)
```
**Output Structure**:
```
.workflow/WFS-{session}/.design/
├── style-extraction/
│ ├── claude_vision_analysis.json
│ ├── gemini_vision_analysis.json
│ ├── codex_vision_analysis.json
│ ├── semantic_style_analysis.json (synthesis)
│ ├── design-tokens.json (preliminary)
│ └── style-cards.json (variants for selection)
├── style-consolidation/
│ ├── style-philosophy.md
│ ├── design-tokens.json (final, validated)
│ ├── style-guide.md
│ ├── tailwind.config.js
│ └── validation-report.json
└── prototypes/
├── {page}-variant-{n}.html (per page, per variant)
├── {page}-variant-{n}.css (token-driven styles)
├── {page}-variant-{n}-notes.md (implementation notes)
└── design-tokens.css (CSS custom properties)
```
**New Agent Documentation**:
- **`ui-design-agent.md`**: Specialized agent for UI/UX design workflows
- Vision analysis, token generation, prototype creation capabilities
- Multi-modal vision provider strategy (Gemini primary, Codex fallback)
- Quality gates: WCAG AA, token coverage ≥90%, component mapping ≥95%
- Flow control specification for 3 design phases
#### Use Cases
**When to Use Design Workflow**:
- User-facing applications with visual design requirements
- Design system creation and maintenance
- Brand-critical user interfaces
- Projects requiring accessibility compliance
- Multi-page applications with consistent styling
**When to Skip Design Workflow**:
- Backend APIs without UI components
- CLI tools and command-line applications
- Quick prototypes and MVPs
- Projects with existing design systems
---
## [3.4.2] - 2025-10-05
### 📚 CLI Documentation Refactoring

View File

@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ FORCE=false
NON_INTERACTIVE=false
BACKUP_ALL=true # Enabled by default
NO_BACKUP=false
SOURCE_VERSION="" # Version from remote installer
SOURCE_BRANCH="" # Branch from remote installer
SOURCE_COMMIT="" # Commit SHA from remote installer
# Functions
function write_color() {
@@ -99,6 +102,7 @@ function test_prerequisites() {
local claude_md="$script_dir/CLAUDE.md"
local codex_dir="$script_dir/.codex"
local gemini_dir="$script_dir/.gemini"
local qwen_dir="$script_dir/.qwen"
if [ ! -d "$claude_dir" ]; then
write_color "ERROR: .claude directory not found in $script_dir" "$COLOR_ERROR"
@@ -120,6 +124,11 @@ function test_prerequisites() {
return 1
fi
if [ ! -d "$qwen_dir" ]; then
write_color "ERROR: .qwen directory not found in $script_dir" "$COLOR_ERROR"
return 1
fi
write_color "✓ Prerequisites check passed" "$COLOR_SUCCESS"
return 0
}
@@ -403,6 +412,7 @@ function install_global() {
local global_claude_md="${global_claude_dir}/CLAUDE.md"
local global_codex_dir="${user_home}/.codex"
local global_gemini_dir="${user_home}/.gemini"
local global_qwen_dir="${user_home}/.qwen"
write_color "Global installation path: $user_home" "$COLOR_INFO"
@@ -412,6 +422,7 @@ function install_global() {
local source_claude_md="${script_dir}/CLAUDE.md"
local source_codex_dir="${script_dir}/.codex"
local source_gemini_dir="${script_dir}/.gemini"
local source_qwen_dir="${script_dir}/.qwen"
# Create backup folder if needed
local backup_folder=""
@@ -424,6 +435,8 @@ function install_global() {
has_existing_files=true
elif [ -d "$global_gemini_dir" ] && [ "$(ls -A "$global_gemini_dir" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
has_existing_files=true
elif [ -d "$global_qwen_dir" ] && [ "$(ls -A "$global_qwen_dir" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
has_existing_files=true
elif [ -f "$global_claude_md" ]; then
has_existing_files=true
fi
@@ -450,6 +463,10 @@ function install_global() {
write_color "Merging .gemini directory contents..." "$COLOR_INFO"
merge_directory_contents "$source_gemini_dir" "$global_gemini_dir" ".gemini directory contents" "$backup_folder"
# Merge .qwen directory contents
write_color "Merging .qwen directory contents..." "$COLOR_INFO"
merge_directory_contents "$source_qwen_dir" "$global_qwen_dir" ".qwen directory contents" "$backup_folder"
# Remove empty backup folder
if [ -n "$backup_folder" ] && [ -d "$backup_folder" ]; then
if [ -z "$(ls -A "$backup_folder" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
@@ -458,6 +475,10 @@ function install_global() {
fi
fi
# Create version.json in global .claude directory
write_color "Creating version.json..." "$COLOR_INFO"
create_version_json "$global_claude_dir" "Global"
return 0
}
@@ -477,16 +498,18 @@ function install_path() {
local source_claude_md="${script_dir}/CLAUDE.md"
local source_codex_dir="${script_dir}/.codex"
local source_gemini_dir="${script_dir}/.gemini"
local source_qwen_dir="${script_dir}/.qwen"
# Local paths
local local_claude_dir="${target_dir}/.claude"
local local_codex_dir="${target_dir}/.codex"
local local_gemini_dir="${target_dir}/.gemini"
local local_qwen_dir="${target_dir}/.qwen"
# Create backup folder if needed
local backup_folder=""
if [ "$NO_BACKUP" = false ]; then
if [ -d "$local_claude_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_codex_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_gemini_dir" ] || [ -d "$global_claude_dir" ]; then
if [ -d "$local_claude_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_codex_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_gemini_dir" ] || [ -d "$local_qwen_dir" ] || [ -d "$global_claude_dir" ]; then
backup_folder=$(get_backup_directory "$target_dir")
write_color "Backup folder created: $backup_folder" "$COLOR_INFO"
fi
@@ -575,6 +598,10 @@ function install_path() {
write_color "Merging .gemini directory contents to local location..." "$COLOR_INFO"
merge_directory_contents "$source_gemini_dir" "$local_gemini_dir" ".gemini directory contents" "$backup_folder"
# Merge .qwen directory contents to local location
write_color "Merging .qwen directory contents to local location..." "$COLOR_INFO"
merge_directory_contents "$source_qwen_dir" "$local_qwen_dir" ".qwen directory contents" "$backup_folder"
# Remove empty backup folder
if [ -n "$backup_folder" ] && [ -d "$backup_folder" ]; then
if [ -z "$(ls -A "$backup_folder" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
@@ -583,12 +610,20 @@ function install_path() {
fi
fi
# Create version.json in local .claude directory
write_color "Creating version.json in local directory..." "$COLOR_INFO"
create_version_json "$local_claude_dir" "Path"
# Also create version.json in global .claude directory
write_color "Creating version.json in global directory..." "$COLOR_INFO"
create_version_json "$global_claude_dir" "Global"
return 0
}
function get_installation_mode() {
if [ -n "$INSTALL_MODE" ]; then
write_color "Installation mode: $INSTALL_MODE" "$COLOR_INFO"
write_color "Installation mode: $INSTALL_MODE" "$COLOR_INFO" >&2
echo "$INSTALL_MODE"
return
fi
@@ -658,6 +693,42 @@ function get_installation_path() {
done
}
function create_version_json() {
local target_claude_dir="$1"
local installation_mode="$2"
# Determine version from source parameter (passed from install-remote.sh)
local version_number="${SOURCE_VERSION:-unknown}"
local source_branch="${SOURCE_BRANCH:-unknown}"
local commit_sha="${SOURCE_COMMIT:-unknown}"
# Get current UTC timestamp
local installation_date_utc=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" 2>/dev/null || date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
# Create version.json content
local version_json_path="${target_claude_dir}/version.json"
cat > "$version_json_path" << EOF
{
"version": "$version_number",
"commit_sha": "$commit_sha",
"installation_mode": "$installation_mode",
"installation_path": "$target_claude_dir",
"installation_date_utc": "$installation_date_utc",
"source_branch": "$source_branch",
"installer_version": "$VERSION"
}
EOF
if [ -f "$version_json_path" ]; then
write_color "Created version.json: $version_number ($commit_sha) - $installation_mode" "$COLOR_SUCCESS"
return 0
else
write_color "WARNING: Failed to create version.json" "$COLOR_WARNING"
return 1
fi
}
function show_summary() {
local mode="$1"
local path="$2"
@@ -676,11 +747,11 @@ function show_summary() {
if [ "$mode" = "Path" ]; then
echo " Local Path: $path"
echo " Global Path: $HOME"
echo " Local Components: agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini"
echo " Local Components: agents, commands, output-styles, .codex, .gemini, .qwen"
echo " Global Components: workflows, scripts, python_script, etc."
else
echo " Path: $path"
echo " Global Components: .claude, .codex, .gemini"
echo " Global Components: .claude, .codex, .gemini, .qwen"
fi
if [ "$NO_BACKUP" = true ]; then
@@ -696,10 +767,11 @@ function show_summary() {
echo "1. Review CLAUDE.md - Customize guidelines for your project"
echo "2. Review .codex/Agent.md - Codex agent execution protocol"
echo "3. Review .gemini/CLAUDE.md - Gemini agent execution protocol"
echo "4. Configure settings - Edit .claude/settings.local.json as needed"
echo "5. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflow coordination!"
echo "6. Use /workflow commands for task execution"
echo "7. Use /update-memory commands for memory system management"
echo "4. Review .qwen/QWEN.md - Qwen agent execution protocol"
echo "5. Configure settings - Edit .claude/settings.local.json as needed"
echo "6. Start using Claude Code with Agent workflow coordination!"
echo "7. Use /workflow commands for task execution"
echo "8. Use /update-memory commands for memory system management"
echo ""
write_color "Documentation: https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow" "$COLOR_INFO"
@@ -735,6 +807,18 @@ function parse_arguments() {
BACKUP_ALL=false
shift
;;
-SourceVersion)
SOURCE_VERSION="$2"
shift 2
;;
-SourceBranch)
SOURCE_BRANCH="$2"
shift 2
;;
-SourceCommit)
SOURCE_COMMIT="$2"
shift 2
;;
--help|-h)
show_help
exit 0
@@ -761,6 +845,9 @@ Options:
-NonInteractive Run in non-interactive mode with default options
-BackupAll Automatically backup all existing files (default)
-NoBackup Disable automatic backup functionality
-SourceVersion <ver> Source version (passed from install-remote.sh)
-SourceBranch <name> Source branch (passed from install-remote.sh)
-SourceCommit <sha> Source commit SHA (passed from install-remote.sh)
--help, -h Show this help message
Examples:
@@ -776,6 +863,9 @@ Examples:
# Installation without backup
$0 -NoBackup
# With version info (typically called by install-remote.sh)
$0 -InstallMode Global -Force -SourceVersion "3.4.2" -SourceBranch "main" -SourceCommit "abc1234"
EOF
}

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
<div align="center">
[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.4.2-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.5.0-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green.svg)](LICENSE)
[![Platform](https://img.shields.io/badge/platform-Windows%20%7C%20Linux%20%7C%20macOS-lightgrey.svg)]()
[![MCP Tools](https://img.shields.io/badge/🔧_MCP_Tools-Experimental-orange.svg)](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol)
@@ -15,15 +15,16 @@
**Claude Code Workflow (CCW)** is a next-generation multi-agent automation framework that orchestrates complex software development tasks through intelligent workflow management and autonomous execution.
> **🎉 Latest: v3.4.2** - CLI documentation refactoring & single source of truth. See [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) for details.
> **🎉 Latest: v3.5.0** - UI Design Workflow with Triple Vision Analysis. See [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) for details.
>
> **What's New in v3.4.2**:
> - 📚 **CLI Documentation Refactoring**: Eliminated 681 lines of duplicate content across 7 command files
> - 🎯 **Single Source of Truth**: Established implicit reference pattern to `intelligent-tools-strategy.md`
> - 🔍 **Documentation Consistency**: All CLI commands now reference centralized strategy guide
> - 💡 **Maintenance Optimization**: Reduced maintenance overhead while preserving unique command features
> - **Enhanced Clarity**: Streamlined documentation focuses on command-specific capabilities
> - 📖 **Better Organization**: File patterns, templates, and MODE definitions centralized
> **What's New in v3.5.0**:
> - 🎨 **UI Design Workflow**: Complete design refinement workflow from style extraction to prototype generation
> - 👁️ **Triple Vision Analysis**: Combines Claude Code + Gemini + Codex vision capabilities for comprehensive style extraction
> - ⏸️ **Interactive Checkpoints**: User selection points for style variants and prototype confirmation
> - 🎯 **Zero Agent Overhead**: Direct bash execution for CLI tools, removing unnecessary agent wrappers
> - 🎨 **Style Customization**: Runtime override support with `--style-overrides` parameter
> - 📦 **Batch Task Generation**: Optional automatic task creation for selected prototypes with `--batch-plan`
> - 🔄 **Semi-Autonomous Workflow**: User-driven continuation at critical design decision points
---
@@ -250,7 +251,19 @@ MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools provide advanced codebase analysis. **Recomme
/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis # Generate consolidated specification
```
**Phase 2: Action Planning**
**Phase 2: UI Design Refinement** *(Optional for UI-heavy projects)*
```bash
# Extract design styles from reference images and generate prototypes
/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png" --pages "login,register" --batch-plan
# Or run individual design phases
/workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png"
/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-auth --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
/workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-auth --pages "login,register" --variants 2
/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-auth --selected-prototypes "login-variant-1,register-variant-2"
```
**Phase 3: Action Planning**
```bash
# Create executable implementation plan
/workflow:plan "Implement JWT-based authentication system"
@@ -259,7 +272,7 @@ MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools provide advanced codebase analysis. **Recomme
/workflow:tdd-plan "Implement authentication with test-first development"
```
**Phase 3: Execution**
**Phase 4: Execution**
```bash
# Execute tasks with AI agents
/workflow:execute
@@ -268,7 +281,7 @@ MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools provide advanced codebase analysis. **Recomme
/workflow:status
```
**Phase 4: Testing & Quality Assurance**
**Phase 5: Testing & Quality Assurance**
```bash
# Generate independent test-fix workflow (v3.2.2+)
/workflow:test-gen WFS-auth # Creates WFS-test-auth session
@@ -341,6 +354,11 @@ MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools provide advanced codebase analysis. **Recomme
|---|---|
| `/workflow:session:*` | Manage development sessions (`start`, `pause`, `resume`, `list`, `switch`, `complete`). |
| `/workflow:brainstorm:*` | Use role-based agents for multi-perspective planning. |
| `/workflow:design:auto` | **NEW** Semi-autonomous UI design workflow with interactive checkpoints for style and prototype selection. |
| `/workflow:design:style-extract` | **NEW** Extract design styles from reference images using triple vision analysis (Claude + Gemini + Codex). |
| `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` | **NEW** Consolidate selected style variants into validated design tokens and style guide. |
| `/workflow:design:ui-generate` | **NEW** Generate token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes with optional style overrides. |
| `/workflow:design:design-update` | **NEW** Integrate finalized design system into brainstorming artifacts. |
| `/workflow:plan` | Create a detailed, executable plan from a description. |
| `/workflow:tdd-plan` | Create TDD workflow (6 phases) with test coverage analysis and Red-Green-Refactor cycles. |
| `/workflow:execute` | Execute the current workflow plan autonomously. |

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
<div align="center">
[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.4.2-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
[![Version](https://img.shields.io/badge/version-v3.5.0-blue.svg)](https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow/releases)
[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green.svg)](LICENSE)
[![Platform](https://img.shields.io/badge/platform-Windows%20%7C%20Linux%20%7C%20macOS-lightgrey.svg)]()
[![MCP工具](https://img.shields.io/badge/🔧_MCP工具-实验性-orange.svg)](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol)
@@ -15,15 +15,16 @@
**Claude Code Workflow (CCW)** 是一个新一代的多智能体自动化开发框架,通过智能工作流管理和自主执行来协调复杂的软件开发任务。
> **🎉 最新版本: v3.4.2** - CLI 文档重构与单一信息源。详见 [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)。
> **🎉 最新版本: v3.5.0** - UI 设计工作流与三重视觉分析。详见 [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)。
>
> **v3.4.2 版本新特性**:
> - 📚 **CLI 文档重构**: 消除 7 个命令文件中的 681 行重复内容
> - 🎯 **单一信息源**: 建立对 `intelligent-tools-strategy.md` 的隐式引用模式
> - 🔍 **文档一致性**: 所有 CLI 命令现在引用集中的策略指南
> - 💡 **维护优化**: 降低维护开销,同时保留独特的命令功能
> - **增强清晰度**: 精简的文档专注于命令特定功能
> - 📖 **更好的组织**: 文件模式、模板和 MODE 定义集中化
> **v3.5.0 版本新特性**:
> - 🎨 **UI 设计工作流**: 从风格提取到原型生成的完整设计精炼工作流
> - 👁️ **三重视觉分析**: 融合 Claude Code + Gemini + Codex 视觉能力进行综合风格提取
> - ⏸️ **交互式检查点**: 用户选择风格变体和原型确认的决策点
> - 🎯 **零智能体开销**: CLI 工具直接 bash 执行,移除不必要的智能体包装
> - 🎨 **风格自定义**: 通过 `--style-overrides` 参数支持运行时样式覆盖
> - 📦 **批量任务生成**: 使用 `--batch-plan` 为选定原型自动创建实现任务
> - 🔄 **半自主工作流**: 在关键设计决策点由用户驱动继续
---
@@ -250,7 +251,19 @@ MCP (模型上下文协议) 工具提供高级代码库分析。**推荐安装**
/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis # 生成综合规范
```
**阶段 2行动规划**
**阶段 2UI 设计精炼** *(UI 密集型项目可选)*
```bash
# 从参考图像中提取设计风格并生成原型
/workflow:design:auto --session WFS-auth --images "design-refs/*.png" --pages "login,register" --batch-plan
# 或者运行单独的设计阶段
/workflow:design:style-extract --session WFS-auth --images "refs/*.png"
/workflow:design:style-consolidate --session WFS-auth --variants "variant-1,variant-3"
/workflow:design:ui-generate --session WFS-auth --pages "login,register" --variants 2
/workflow:design:design-update --session WFS-auth --selected-prototypes "login-variant-1,register-variant-2"
```
**阶段 3行动规划**
```bash
# 创建可执行的实现计划
/workflow:plan "实现基于 JWT 的认证系统"
@@ -259,7 +272,7 @@ MCP (模型上下文协议) 工具提供高级代码库分析。**推荐安装**
/workflow:tdd-plan "使用测试优先开发实现认证"
```
**阶段 3:执行**
**阶段 4:执行**
```bash
# 使用 AI 智能体执行任务
/workflow:execute
@@ -268,7 +281,7 @@ MCP (模型上下文协议) 工具提供高级代码库分析。**推荐安装**
/workflow:status
```
**阶段 4:测试与质量保证**
**阶段 5:测试与质量保证**
```bash
# 生成独立测试修复工作流v3.2.2+
/workflow:test-gen WFS-auth # 创建 WFS-test-auth 会话
@@ -341,6 +354,11 @@ MCP (模型上下文协议) 工具提供高级代码库分析。**推荐安装**
|---|---|
| `/workflow:session:*` | 管理开发会话(`start`, `pause`, `resume`, `list`, `switch`, `complete`)。 |
| `/workflow:brainstorm:*` | 使用基于角色的智能体进行多视角规划。 |
| `/workflow:design:auto` | **新增** 带交互式检查点的半自主 UI 设计工作流,用于风格和原型选择。 |
| `/workflow:design:style-extract` | **新增** 使用三重视觉分析Claude + Gemini + Codex从参考图像提取设计风格。 |
| `/workflow:design:style-consolidate` | **新增** 将选定的风格变体整合为经过验证的设计令牌和风格指南。 |
| `/workflow:design:ui-generate` | **新增** 生成基于令牌的 HTML/CSS 原型,支持可选的风格覆盖。 |
| `/workflow:design:design-update` | **新增** 将最终确定的设计系统集成到头脑风暴产物中。 |
| `/workflow:plan` | 从描述创建详细、可执行的计划。 |
| `/workflow:tdd-plan` | 创建 TDD 工作流6 阶段),包含测试覆盖分析和 Red-Green-Refactor 循环。 |
| `/workflow:execute` | 自主执行当前的工作流计划。 |