Claude-Code-Workflow/.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/instructions/agent-instruction.md at 3341a2e77242c1175cb151e7da3e9e078b552387

mirror of https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git synced 2026-03-10 17:11:04 +08:00

Files

catlog22 62d8aa3623 Add unit tests for various components and stores in the terminal dashboard

- Implement tests for AssociationHighlight, DashboardToolbar, QueuePanel, SessionGroupTree, and TerminalDashboardPage to ensure proper functionality and state management.
- Create tests for cliSessionStore, issueQueueIntegrationStore, queueExecutionStore, queueSchedulerStore, sessionManagerStore, and terminalGridStore to validate state resets and workspace scoping.
- Mock necessary dependencies and state management hooks to isolate tests and ensure accurate behavior.

2026-03-08 21:38:20 +08:00

4.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

TASK ASSIGNMENT

MANDATORY FIRST STEPS

Read shared discoveries: .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson (if exists, skip if not)
Read project context: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)

Your Task

Task ID: {id} Title: {title} Role: {role} Description: {description} Angle(s): {angle} GC Round: {gc_round}

Previous Tasks' Findings (Context)

{prev_context}

Execution Protocol

Read discoveries: Load shared discoveries from the session's discoveries.ndjson for cross-task context
Use context: Apply previous tasks' findings from prev_context above
Execute by role:

Role: ideator (IDEA-* tasks)

Initial Generation (gc_round = 0):
- For each angle listed in the Angle(s) field, generate 3+ ideas
- Each idea must include: title, description (2-3 sentences), key assumption, potential impact, implementation hint
- Self-review: ensure >= 6 ideas total, no duplicates, all angles covered
GC Revision (gc_round > 0):
- Read critique findings from prev_context
- Focus on HIGH/CRITICAL severity challenges
- Retain unchallenged ideas intact
- Revise challenged ideas with revision rationale
- Replace unsalvageable ideas with new alternatives

Role: challenger (CHALLENGE-* tasks)

Read all idea findings from prev_context
Challenge each idea across 4 dimensions:
- Assumption Validity: Does the core assumption hold? Counter-examples?
- Feasibility: Technical/resource/time feasibility?
- Risk Assessment: Worst case scenario? Hidden risks?
- Competitive Analysis: Better alternatives already exist?
Assign severity per idea: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
Determine GC signal:
- Any CRITICAL or HIGH severity → REVISION_NEEDED
- All MEDIUM or lower → CONVERGED

Role: synthesizer (SYNTH-* tasks)

Read all idea and critique findings from prev_context
Execute synthesis steps:
1. Theme Extraction: Identify common themes, rate strength (1-10), list supporting ideas
2. Conflict Resolution: Identify contradictions, determine resolution approach
3. Complementary Grouping: Group complementary ideas together
4. Gap Identification: Discover uncovered perspectives
5. Integrated Proposals: Generate 1-3 consolidated proposals with feasibility score (1-10) and innovation score (1-10)

Role: evaluator (EVAL-* tasks)

Read synthesis findings from prev_context
Score each proposal across 4 weighted dimensions:
- Feasibility (30%): Technical feasibility, resource needs, timeline
- Innovation (25%): Novelty, differentiation, breakthrough potential
- Impact (25%): Scope of impact, value creation, problem resolution
- Cost Efficiency (20%): Implementation cost, risk cost, opportunity cost
Weighted score = (Feasibility * 0.30) + (Innovation * 0.25) + (Impact * 0.25) + (Cost * 0.20)
Provide recommendation per proposal: Strong Recommend / Recommend / Consider / Pass
Generate final ranking

Share discoveries: Append exploration findings to shared board:
```
echo '{"ts":"<ISO8601>","worker":"{id}","type":"<type>","data":{...}}' >> .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson
```
Discovery types to share:
- idea: {title, angle, description, assumption, impact} — generated idea
- critique: {idea_title, dimension, severity, challenge, rationale} — critique finding
- theme: {name, strength, supporting_ideas[]} — extracted theme
- proposal: {title, source_ideas[], feasibility, innovation, description} — integrated proposal
- evaluation: {proposal_title, weighted_score, rank, recommendation} — scored proposal
Report result: Return JSON via report_agent_job_result

Output (report_agent_job_result)

Return JSON: { "id": "{id}", "status": "completed" | "failed", "findings": "Key discoveries and implementation notes (max 500 chars)", "gc_signal": "REVISION_NEEDED | CONVERGED | (empty for non-challenger roles)", "severity_summary": "CRITICAL:N HIGH:N MEDIUM:N LOW:N (challenger only, empty for others)", "error": "" }

Role-specific findings guidance:

ideator: List idea count, angles covered, key themes. Example: "Generated 8 ideas across Technical, Product, Innovation. Top ideas: API Gateway, Event Sourcing, DevEx Platform."
challenger: Summarize severity counts and GC signal. Example: "Challenged 8 ideas. 2 HIGH (require revision), 3 MEDIUM, 3 LOW. GC signal: REVISION_NEEDED."
synthesizer: List proposal count and key themes. Example: "Synthesized 3 proposals from 5 themes. Top: Infrastructure Modernization (feasibility:8, innovation:7)."
evaluator: List ranking and top recommendation. Example: "Ranked 3 proposals. #1: Infrastructure Modernization (7.85) - Strong Recommend."

4.7 KiB Raw Blame History