mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-10 17:11:04 +08:00
62d8aa3623
- Implement tests for AssociationHighlight, DashboardToolbar, QueuePanel, SessionGroupTree, and TerminalDashboardPage to ensure proper functionality and state management. - Create tests for cliSessionStore, issueQueueIntegrationStore, queueExecutionStore, queueSchedulerStore, sessionManagerStore, and terminalGridStore to validate state resets and workspace scoping. - Mock necessary dependencies and state management hooks to isolate tests and ensure accurate behavior.
106 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
106 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
|
|
|
|
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
|
|
1. Read shared discoveries: .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson (if exists, skip if not)
|
|
2. Read project context: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Your Task
|
|
|
|
**Task ID**: {id}
|
|
**Title**: {title}
|
|
**Role**: {role}
|
|
**Description**: {description}
|
|
**Angle(s)**: {angle}
|
|
**GC Round**: {gc_round}
|
|
|
|
### Previous Tasks' Findings (Context)
|
|
{prev_context}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Execution Protocol
|
|
|
|
1. **Read discoveries**: Load shared discoveries from the session's discoveries.ndjson for cross-task context
|
|
2. **Use context**: Apply previous tasks' findings from prev_context above
|
|
3. **Execute by role**:
|
|
|
|
### Role: ideator (IDEA-* tasks)
|
|
- **Initial Generation** (gc_round = 0):
|
|
- For each angle listed in the Angle(s) field, generate 3+ ideas
|
|
- Each idea must include: title, description (2-3 sentences), key assumption, potential impact, implementation hint
|
|
- Self-review: ensure >= 6 ideas total, no duplicates, all angles covered
|
|
- **GC Revision** (gc_round > 0):
|
|
- Read critique findings from prev_context
|
|
- Focus on HIGH/CRITICAL severity challenges
|
|
- Retain unchallenged ideas intact
|
|
- Revise challenged ideas with revision rationale
|
|
- Replace unsalvageable ideas with new alternatives
|
|
|
|
### Role: challenger (CHALLENGE-* tasks)
|
|
- Read all idea findings from prev_context
|
|
- Challenge each idea across 4 dimensions:
|
|
- **Assumption Validity**: Does the core assumption hold? Counter-examples?
|
|
- **Feasibility**: Technical/resource/time feasibility?
|
|
- **Risk Assessment**: Worst case scenario? Hidden risks?
|
|
- **Competitive Analysis**: Better alternatives already exist?
|
|
- Assign severity per idea: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
|
|
- Determine GC signal:
|
|
- Any CRITICAL or HIGH severity → `REVISION_NEEDED`
|
|
- All MEDIUM or lower → `CONVERGED`
|
|
|
|
### Role: synthesizer (SYNTH-* tasks)
|
|
- Read all idea and critique findings from prev_context
|
|
- Execute synthesis steps:
|
|
1. **Theme Extraction**: Identify common themes, rate strength (1-10), list supporting ideas
|
|
2. **Conflict Resolution**: Identify contradictions, determine resolution approach
|
|
3. **Complementary Grouping**: Group complementary ideas together
|
|
4. **Gap Identification**: Discover uncovered perspectives
|
|
5. **Integrated Proposals**: Generate 1-3 consolidated proposals with feasibility score (1-10) and innovation score (1-10)
|
|
|
|
### Role: evaluator (EVAL-* tasks)
|
|
- Read synthesis findings from prev_context
|
|
- Score each proposal across 4 weighted dimensions:
|
|
- Feasibility (30%): Technical feasibility, resource needs, timeline
|
|
- Innovation (25%): Novelty, differentiation, breakthrough potential
|
|
- Impact (25%): Scope of impact, value creation, problem resolution
|
|
- Cost Efficiency (20%): Implementation cost, risk cost, opportunity cost
|
|
- Weighted score = (Feasibility * 0.30) + (Innovation * 0.25) + (Impact * 0.25) + (Cost * 0.20)
|
|
- Provide recommendation per proposal: Strong Recommend / Recommend / Consider / Pass
|
|
- Generate final ranking
|
|
|
|
4. **Share discoveries**: Append exploration findings to shared board:
|
|
```bash
|
|
echo '{"ts":"<ISO8601>","worker":"{id}","type":"<type>","data":{...}}' >> .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Discovery types to share:
|
|
- `idea`: {title, angle, description, assumption, impact} — generated idea
|
|
- `critique`: {idea_title, dimension, severity, challenge, rationale} — critique finding
|
|
- `theme`: {name, strength, supporting_ideas[]} — extracted theme
|
|
- `proposal`: {title, source_ideas[], feasibility, innovation, description} — integrated proposal
|
|
- `evaluation`: {proposal_title, weighted_score, rank, recommendation} — scored proposal
|
|
|
|
5. **Report result**: Return JSON via report_agent_job_result
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Output (report_agent_job_result)
|
|
|
|
Return JSON:
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "{id}",
|
|
"status": "completed" | "failed",
|
|
"findings": "Key discoveries and implementation notes (max 500 chars)",
|
|
"gc_signal": "REVISION_NEEDED | CONVERGED | (empty for non-challenger roles)",
|
|
"severity_summary": "CRITICAL:N HIGH:N MEDIUM:N LOW:N (challenger only, empty for others)",
|
|
"error": ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
**Role-specific findings guidance**:
|
|
- **ideator**: List idea count, angles covered, key themes. Example: "Generated 8 ideas across Technical, Product, Innovation. Top ideas: API Gateway, Event Sourcing, DevEx Platform."
|
|
- **challenger**: Summarize severity counts and GC signal. Example: "Challenged 8 ideas. 2 HIGH (require revision), 3 MEDIUM, 3 LOW. GC signal: REVISION_NEEDED."
|
|
- **synthesizer**: List proposal count and key themes. Example: "Synthesized 3 proposals from 5 themes. Top: Infrastructure Modernization (feasibility:8, innovation:7)."
|
|
- **evaluator**: List ranking and top recommendation. Example: "Ranked 3 proposals. #1: Infrastructure Modernization (7.85) - Strong Recommend."
|