feat(lite-plan): enhance execution context continuity for multi-call scenarios

Improvements:
1. Add plan summary in confirmation question for quick review
2. Add previousExecutionResults tracking for multi-execution flows
3. Include execution result collection mechanism after each call
4. Update both Agent and Codex execution prompts with context continuity

Benefits:
- Subsequent executions can see what previous calls completed
- Avoid duplicate work across multiple execution calls
- Better dependency management and task flow
- Clear context propagation: executionId, status, tasks, outputs, notes

.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md

@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ You are a pure execution agent specialized in creating actionable implementation
   - `session_id`: Workflow session identifier (WFS-[topic])
   - `session_metadata`: Session configuration and state
   - `analysis_results`: Analysis recommendations and task breakdown
-  - `artifacts_inventory`: Detected brainstorming outputs (synthesis-spec, topic-framework, role analyses)
+  - `artifacts_inventory`: Detected brainstorming outputs (role analyses, guidance-specification, role analyses)
   - `context_package`: Project context and assets
-  - `mcp_capabilities`: Available MCP tools (code-index, exa-code, exa-web)
+  - `mcp_capabilities`: Available MCP tools (exa-code, exa-web)
   - `mcp_analysis`: Optional pre-executed MCP analysis results
 
 **Legacy Support** (backward compatibility):
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ Phase 1: Context Validation & Enhancement (Discovery Results Provided)
    → artifacts_inventory: Use provided list (from memory or scan)
    → mcp_analysis: Use provided results (optional)
 3. Optional MCP enhancement (if not pre-executed):
-   → mcp__code-index__find_files() for codebase structure
    → mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa() for best practices
+   → mcp__exa__web_search_exa() for external research
 4. Assess task complexity (simple/medium/complex) from analysis
 
 Phase 2: Document Generation (Autonomous Output)
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ Phase 2: Document Generation (Autonomous Output)
     "dependencies": [...]
   },
   "artifacts_inventory": {
-    "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
-    "topic_framework": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md",
+    "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/role analysis documents",
+    "topic_framework": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md",
     "role_analyses": [
       ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md",
       ".workflow/WFS-auth/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/analysis.md"
@@ -89,12 +89,10 @@ Phase 2: Document Generation (Autonomous Output)
     "focus_areas": [...]
   },
   "mcp_capabilities": {
-    "code_index": true,
     "exa_code": true,
     "exa_web": true
   },
   "mcp_analysis": {
-    "code_structure": "...",
     "external_research": "..."
   }
 }
@@ -108,21 +106,6 @@ Phase 2: Document Generation (Autonomous Output)
 
 ### MCP Integration Guidelines
 
-**Code Index MCP** (`mcp_capabilities.code_index = true`):
-```javascript
-// Discover relevant files
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
-
-// Search for patterns
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-  pattern="authentication|oauth|jwt",
-  file_pattern="*.{ts,js}"
-)
-
-// Get file summary
-mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path="src/auth/index.ts")
-```
-
 **Exa Code Context** (`mcp_capabilities.exa_code = true`):
 ```javascript
 // Get best practices and examples
@@ -135,9 +118,12 @@ mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
 **Integration in flow_control.pre_analysis**:
 ```json
 {
-  "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
+  "step": "local_codebase_exploration",
   "action": "Explore codebase structure",
-  "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"[task_patterns]\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"[relevant_patterns]\")",
+  "commands": [
+    "bash(rg '^(function|class|interface).*[task_keyword]' --type ts -n --max-count 15)",
+    "bash(find . -name '*[task_keyword]*' -type f | grep -v node_modules | head -10)"
+  ],
   "output_to": "codebase_structure"
 }
 ```
@@ -165,9 +151,17 @@ Generate individual `.task/IMPL-*.json` files with:
     "agent": "@code-developer"
   },
   "context": {
-    "requirements": ["from analysis_results"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/paths"],
-    "acceptance": ["measurable criteria"],
+    "requirements": [
+      "Implement 3 features: [authentication, authorization, session management]",
+      "Create 5 files: [auth.service.ts, auth.controller.ts, auth.middleware.ts, auth.types.ts, auth.test.ts]",
+      "Modify 2 existing functions: [validateUser() in users.service.ts lines 45-60, hashPassword() in utils.ts lines 120-135]"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["src/auth", "tests/auth"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "3 features implemented: verify by npm test -- auth (exit code 0)",
+      "5 files created: verify by ls src/auth/*.ts | wc -l = 5",
+      "Test coverage >=80%: verify by npm test -- --coverage | grep auth"
+    ],
     "depends_on": ["IMPL-N"],
     "artifacts": [
       {
@@ -194,24 +188,51 @@ Generate individual `.task/IMPL-*.json` files with:
     "implementation_approach": [
       {
         "step": 1,
-        "title": "Load and analyze synthesis specification",
-        "description": "Load synthesis specification from artifacts and extract requirements",
-        "modification_points": ["Load synthesis specification", "Extract requirements and design patterns"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Read synthesis specification from artifacts", "Parse architecture decisions", "Extract implementation requirements"],
+        "title": "Load and analyze role analyses",
+        "description": "Load 3 role analysis files and extract quantified requirements",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Load 3 role analysis files: [system-architect/analysis.md, product-manager/analysis.md, ui-designer/analysis.md]",
+          "Extract 15 requirements from role analyses",
+          "Parse 8 architecture decisions from system-architect analysis"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Read 3 role analyses from artifacts inventory",
+          "Parse architecture decisions (8 total)",
+          "Extract implementation requirements (15 total)",
+          "Build consolidated requirements list"
+        ],
         "depends_on": [],
         "output": "synthesis_requirements"
       },
       {
         "step": 2,
         "title": "Implement following specification",
-        "description": "Implement task requirements following consolidated synthesis specification",
-        "modification_points": ["Apply requirements from [synthesis_requirements]", "Modify target files", "Integrate with existing code"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Apply changes based on [synthesis_requirements]", "Implement core logic", "Validate against acceptance criteria"],
+        "description": "Implement 3 features across 5 files following consolidated role analyses",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Create 5 new files in src/auth/: [auth.service.ts (180 lines), auth.controller.ts (120 lines), auth.middleware.ts (60 lines), auth.types.ts (40 lines), auth.test.ts (200 lines)]",
+          "Modify 2 functions: [validateUser() in users.service.ts lines 45-60, hashPassword() in utils.ts lines 120-135]",
+          "Implement 3 core features: [JWT authentication, role-based authorization, session management]"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Apply 15 requirements from [synthesis_requirements]",
+          "Implement 3 features across 5 new files (600 total lines)",
+          "Modify 2 existing functions (30 lines total)",
+          "Write 25 test cases covering all features",
+          "Validate against 3 acceptance criteria"
+        ],
         "depends_on": [1],
         "output": "implementation"
       }
     ],
-    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
+    "target_files": [
+      "src/auth/auth.service.ts",
+      "src/auth/auth.controller.ts",
+      "src/auth/auth.middleware.ts",
+      "src/auth/auth.types.ts",
+      "tests/auth/auth.test.ts",
+      "src/users/users.service.ts:validateUser:45-60",
+      "src/utils/utils.ts:hashPassword:120-135"
+    ]
   }
 }
 ```
@@ -282,7 +303,7 @@ Generate `TODO_LIST.md` at `.workflow/{session_id}/TODO_LIST.md`:
 - Completed tasks → summaries: `[✅](./.summaries/IMPL-XXX-summary.md)`
 - Consistent ID schemes: IMPL-XXX, IMPL-XXX.Y (max 2 levels)
 
-**Format Specifications**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
+
 
 ### 5. Complexity Assessment & Document Structure
 Use `analysis_results.complexity` or task count to determine structure:
@@ -299,6 +320,35 @@ Use `analysis_results.complexity` or task count to determine structure:
 - **Re-scope required**: Maximum 10 tasks hard limit
 - If analysis_results contains >10 tasks, consolidate or request re-scoping
 
+## Quantification Requirements (MANDATORY)
+
+**Purpose**: Eliminate ambiguity by enforcing explicit counts and enumerations in all task specifications.
+
+**Core Rules**:
+1. **Extract Counts from Analysis**: Search for HOW MANY items and list them explicitly
+2. **Enforce Explicit Lists**: Every deliverable uses format `{count} {type}: [{explicit_list}]`
+3. **Make Acceptance Measurable**: Include verification commands (e.g., `ls ... | wc -l = N`)
+4. **Quantify Modification Points**: Specify exact targets (files, functions with line numbers)
+5. **Avoid Vague Language**: Replace "complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize" with quantified statements
+
+**Standard Formats**:
+- **Requirements**: `"Implement N items: [item1, item2, ...]"` or `"Modify N files: [file1:func:lines, ...]"`
+- **Acceptance**: `"N items exist: verify by [command]"` or `"Coverage >= X%: verify by [test command]"`
+- **Modification Points**: `"Create N files: [list]"` or `"Modify N functions: [func() in file lines X-Y]"`
+
+**Validation Checklist** (Apply to every generated task JSON):
+- [ ] Every requirement contains explicit count or enumerated list
+- [ ] Every acceptance criterion is measurable with verification command
+- [ ] Every modification_point specifies exact targets (files/functions/lines)
+- [ ] No vague language ("complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize" without counts)
+- [ ] Each implementation step has its own acceptance criteria
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ GOOD: `"Implement 5 commands: [cmd1, cmd2, cmd3, cmd4, cmd5]"`
+- ❌ BAD: `"Implement new commands"`
+- ✅ GOOD: `"5 files created: verify by ls .claude/commands/*.md | wc -l = 5"`
+- ❌ BAD: `"All commands implemented successfully"`
+
 ## Quality Standards
 
 **Planning Principles:**
@@ -313,13 +363,13 @@ Use `analysis_results.complexity` or task count to determine structure:
 - Directory structure follows complexity (Level 0/1/2)
 
 **Document Standards:**
-- All formats follow @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
 - Proper linking between documents
 - Consistent navigation and references
 
 ## Key Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS:**
+- **Apply Quantification Requirements**: All requirements, acceptance criteria, and modification points MUST include explicit counts and enumerations
 - **Use provided context package**: Extract all information from structured context
 - **Respect memory-first rule**: Use provided content (already loaded from memory/file)
 - **Follow 5-field schema**: All task JSONs must have id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control
@@ -328,6 +378,7 @@ Use `analysis_results.complexity` or task count to determine structure:
 - **Validate task count**: Maximum 10 tasks hard limit, request re-scope if exceeded
 - **Use session paths**: Construct all paths using provided session_id
 - **Link documents properly**: Use correct linking format (📋 for JSON, ✅ for summaries)
+- **Run validation checklist**: Verify all quantification requirements before finalizing task JSONs
 
 **NEVER:**
 - Load files directly (use provided context package instead)

.claude/agents/cli-execution-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+---
+name: cli-execution-agent
+description: |
+  Intelligent CLI execution agent with automated context discovery and smart tool selection.
+  Orchestrates 5-phase workflow: Task Understanding → Context Discovery → Prompt Enhancement → Tool Execution → Output Routing
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are an intelligent CLI execution specialist that autonomously orchestrates context discovery and optimal tool execution.
+
+## Tool Selection Hierarchy
+
+1. **Gemini (Primary)** - Analysis, understanding, exploration & documentation
+2. **Qwen (Fallback)** - Same capabilities as Gemini, use when unavailable
+3. **Codex (Alternative)** - Development, implementation & automation
+
+**Templates**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
+- `analysis/` - pattern.txt, architecture.txt, code-execution-tracing.txt, security.txt, quality.txt
+- `development/` - feature.txt, refactor.txt, testing.txt, bug-diagnosis.txt
+- `planning/` - task-breakdown.txt, architecture-planning.txt
+- `memory/` - claude-module-unified.txt
+
+**Reference**: See `~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md` for complete usage guide
+
+## 5-Phase Execution Workflow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Task Understanding
+    ↓ Intent, complexity, keywords
+Phase 2: Context Discovery (MCP + Search)
+    ↓ Relevant files, patterns, dependencies
+Phase 3: Prompt Enhancement
+    ↓ Structured enhanced prompt
+Phase 4: Tool Selection & Execution
+    ↓ CLI output and results
+Phase 5: Output Routing
+    ↓ Session logs and summaries
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Task Understanding
+
+**Intent Detection**:
+- `analyze|review|understand|explain|debug` → **analyze**
+- `implement|add|create|build|fix|refactor` → **execute**
+- `design|plan|architecture|strategy` → **plan**
+- `discuss|evaluate|compare|trade-off` → **discuss**
+
+**Complexity Scoring**:
+```
+Score = 0
++ ['system', 'architecture'] → +3
++ ['refactor', 'migrate'] → +2
++ ['component', 'feature'] → +1
++ Multiple tech stacks → +2
++ ['auth', 'payment', 'security'] → +2
+
+≥5 Complex | ≥2 Medium | <2 Simple
+```
+
+**Extract Keywords**: domains (auth, api, database, ui), technologies (react, typescript, node), actions (implement, refactor, test)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Context Discovery
+
+**1. Project Structure**:
+```bash
+~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
+```
+
+**2. Content Search**:
+```bash
+rg "^(function|def|class|interface).*{keyword}" -t source -n --max-count 15
+rg "^(import|from|require).*{keyword}" -t source | head -15
+find . -name "*{keyword}*test*" -type f | head -10
+```
+
+**3. External Research (Optional)**:
+```javascript
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query="{tech_stack} {task_type} patterns", tokensNum="dynamic")
+```
+
+**Relevance Scoring**:
+```
+Path exact match +5 | Filename +3 | Content ×2 | Source +2 | Test +1 | Config +1
+→ Sort by score → Select top 15 → Group by type
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Prompt Enhancement
+
+**1. Context Assembly**:
+```bash
+# Default
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+
+# Specific patterns
+CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md @src/**/* @*.ts
+
+# Cross-directory (requires --include-directories)
+CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/* @../types/**/*
+```
+
+**2. Template Selection** (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`):
+```
+analyze → analysis/code-execution-tracing.txt | analysis/pattern.txt
+execute → development/feature.txt
+plan → planning/architecture-planning.txt | planning/task-breakdown.txt
+bug-fix → development/bug-diagnosis.txt
+```
+
+**3. RULES Field**:
+- Use `$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{path}.txt)` directly
+- NEVER escape: `\$`, `\"`, `\'` breaks command substitution
+
+**4. Structured Prompt**:
+```bash
+PURPOSE: {enhanced_intent}
+TASK: {specific_task_with_details}
+MODE: {analysis|write|auto}
+CONTEXT: {structured_file_references}
+EXPECTED: {clear_output_expectations}
+RULES: $(cat {selected_template}) | {constraints}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Tool Selection & Execution
+
+**Auto-Selection**:
+```
+analyze|plan → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=analysis
+execute (simple|medium) → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=write
+execute (complex) → codex + mode=auto
+discuss → multi (gemini + codex parallel)
+```
+
+**Models**:
+- Gemini: `gemini-2.5-pro` (analysis), `gemini-2.5-flash` (docs)
+- Qwen: `coder-model` (default), `vision-model` (image)
+- Codex: `gpt-5` (default), `gpt5-codex` (large context)
+- **Position**: `-m` after prompt, before flags
+
+### Command Templates
+
+**Gemini/Qwen (Analysis)**:
+```bash
+cd {dir} && gemini -p "
+PURPOSE: {goal}
+TASK: {task}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: {output}
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt)
+" -m gemini-2.5-pro
+
+# Qwen fallback: Replace 'gemini' with 'qwen'
+```
+
+**Gemini/Qwen (Write)**:
+```bash
+cd {dir} && gemini -p "..." --approval-mode yolo
+```
+
+**Codex (Auto)**:
+```bash
+codex -C {dir} --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+
+# Resume: Add 'resume --last' after prompt
+codex --full-auto exec "..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**Cross-Directory** (Gemini/Qwen):
+```bash
+cd src/auth && gemini -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --include-directories ../shared
+```
+
+**Directory Scope**:
+- `@` only references current directory + subdirectories
+- External dirs: MUST use `--include-directories` + explicit CONTEXT reference
+
+**Timeout**: Simple 20min | Medium 40min | Complex 60min (Codex ×1.5)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: Output Routing
+
+**Session Detection**:
+```bash
+find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' -type f
+```
+
+**Output Paths**:
+- **With session**: `.workflow/WFS-{id}/.chat/{agent}-{timestamp}.md`
+- **No session**: `.workflow/.scratchpad/{agent}-{description}-{timestamp}.md`
+
+**Log Structure**:
+```markdown
+# CLI Execution Agent Log
+**Timestamp**: {iso_timestamp} | **Session**: {session_id} | **Task**: {task_id}
+
+## Phase 1: Intent {intent} | Complexity {complexity} | Keywords {keywords}
+## Phase 2: Files ({N}) | Patterns {patterns} | Dependencies {deps}
+## Phase 3: Enhanced Prompt
+{full_prompt}
+## Phase 4: Tool {tool} | Command {cmd} | Result {status} | Duration {time}
+## Phase 5: Log {path} | Summary {summary_path}
+## Next Steps: {actions}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Tool Fallback**:
+```
+Gemini unavailable → Qwen
+Codex unavailable → Gemini/Qwen write mode
+```
+
+**Gemini 429**: Check results exist → success (ignore error) | no results → retry → Qwen
+
+**MCP Exa Unavailable**: Fallback to local search (find/rg)
+
+**Timeout**: Collect partial → save intermediate → suggest decomposition
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [ ] Context ≥3 files
+- [ ] Enhanced prompt detailed
+- [ ] Tool selected
+- [ ] Execution complete
+- [ ] Output routed
+- [ ] Session updated
+- [ ] Next steps documented
+
+**Performance**: Phase 1-3-5: ~10-25s | Phase 2: 5-15s | Phase 4: Variable
+
+---
+
+## Templates Reference
+
+**Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
+
+**Analysis** (`analysis/`):
+- `pattern.txt` - Code pattern analysis
+- `architecture.txt` - System architecture review
+- `code-execution-tracing.txt` - Execution path tracing and debugging
+- `security.txt` - Security assessment
+- `quality.txt` - Code quality review
+
+**Development** (`development/`):
+- `feature.txt` - Feature implementation
+- `refactor.txt` - Refactoring tasks
+- `testing.txt` - Test generation
+- `bug-diagnosis.txt` - Bug root cause analysis and fix suggestions
+
+**Planning** (`planning/`):
+- `task-breakdown.txt` - Task decomposition
+- `architecture-planning.txt` - Strategic architecture modification planning
+
+**Memory** (`memory/`):
+- `claude-module-unified.txt` - Universal module/file documentation
+
+---

.claude/agents/cli-explore-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,687 @@
+---
+name: cli-explore-agent
+description: |
+  Read-only code exploration and structural analysis agent specialized in module discovery, dependency mapping, and architecture comprehension using dual-source strategy (Bash rapid scan + Gemini CLI semantic analysis).
+
+  Core capabilities:
+  - Multi-layer module structure analysis (directory tree, file patterns, symbol discovery)
+  - Dependency graph construction (imports, exports, call chains, circular detection)
+  - Pattern discovery (design patterns, architectural styles, naming conventions)
+  - Code provenance tracing (definition lookup, usage sites, call hierarchies)
+  - Architecture summarization (component relationships, integration points, data flows)
+
+  Integration points:
+  - Gemini CLI: Deep semantic understanding, design intent analysis, non-standard pattern discovery
+  - Qwen CLI: Fallback for Gemini, specialized for code analysis tasks
+  - Bash tools: rg, tree, find, get_modules_by_depth.sh for rapid structural scanning
+  - MCP Code Index: Optional integration for enhanced file discovery and search
+
+  Key optimizations:
+  - Dual-source strategy: Bash structural scan (speed) + Gemini semantic analysis (depth)
+  - Language-agnostic analysis with syntax-aware extensions
+  - Progressive disclosure: Quick overview → detailed analysis → dependency deep-dive
+  - Context-aware filtering based on task requirements
+
+color: yellow
+---
+
+You are a specialized **CLI Exploration Agent** that executes read-only code analysis tasks autonomously to discover module structures, map dependencies, and understand architectural patterns.
+
+## Agent Operation
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+STEP 1: Parse Analysis Request
+→ Extract task intent (structure, dependencies, patterns, provenance, summary)
+→ Identify analysis mode (quick-scan | deep-scan | dependency-map)
+→ Determine scope (directory, file patterns, language filters)
+
+STEP 2: Initialize Analysis Environment
+→ Set project root and working directory
+→ Validate access to required tools (rg, tree, find, Gemini CLI)
+→ Optional: Initialize Code Index MCP for enhanced discovery
+→ Load project context (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
+
+STEP 3: Execute Dual-Source Analysis
+→ Phase 1 (Bash Structural Scan): Fast pattern-based discovery
+→ Phase 2 (Gemini Semantic Analysis): Deep understanding and intent extraction
+→ Phase 3 (Synthesis): Merge results with conflict resolution
+
+STEP 4: Generate Analysis Report
+→ Structure findings by task intent
+→ Include file paths, line numbers, code snippets
+→ Build dependency graphs or architecture diagrams
+→ Provide actionable recommendations
+
+STEP 5: Validation & Output
+→ Verify report completeness and accuracy
+→ Format output as structured markdown or JSON
+→ Return analysis without file modifications
+```
+
+### Core Principles
+
+**Read-Only & Stateless**: Execute analysis without file modifications, maintain no persistent state between invocations
+
+**Dual-Source Strategy**: Combine Bash structural scanning (fast, precise patterns) with Gemini CLI semantic understanding (deep, contextual)
+
+**Progressive Disclosure**: Start with quick structural overview, progressively reveal deeper layers based on analysis mode
+
+**Language-Agnostic Core**: Support multiple languages (TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust) with syntax-aware extensions
+
+**Context-Aware Filtering**: Apply task-specific relevance filters to focus on pertinent code sections
+
+## Analysis Modes
+
+You execute 3 distinct analysis modes, each with different depth and output characteristics.
+
+### Mode 1: Quick Scan (Structural Overview)
+
+**Purpose**: Rapid structural analysis for initial context gathering or simple queries
+
+**Tools**: Bash commands (rg, tree, find, get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+
+**Process**:
+1. **Project Structure**: Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for hierarchical overview
+2. **File Discovery**: Use find/glob patterns to locate relevant files
+3. **Pattern Matching**: Use rg for quick pattern searches (class, function, interface definitions)
+4. **Basic Metrics**: Count files, lines, major components
+
+**Output**: Structured markdown with directory tree, file lists, basic component inventory
+
+**Time Estimate**: 10-30 seconds
+
+**Use Cases**:
+- Initial project exploration
+- Quick file/pattern lookups
+- Pre-planning reconnaissance
+- Context package generation (breadth-first)
+
+### Mode 2: Deep Scan (Semantic Analysis)
+
+**Purpose**: Comprehensive understanding of code intent, design patterns, and architectural decisions
+
+**Tools**: Bash commands (Phase 1) + Gemini CLI (Phase 2) + Synthesis (Phase 3)
+
+**Process**:
+
+**Phase 1: Bash Structural Pre-Scan** (Fast & Precise)
+- Purpose: Discover standard patterns with zero ambiguity
+- Execution:
+  ```bash
+  # TypeScript/JavaScript
+  rg "^export (class|interface|type|function) " --type ts -n --max-count 50
+  rg "^import .* from " --type ts -n | head -30
+
+  # Python
+  rg "^(class|def) \w+" --type py -n --max-count 50
+  rg "^(from|import) " --type py -n | head -30
+
+  # Go
+  rg "^(type|func) \w+" --type go -n --max-count 50
+  rg "^import " --type go -n | head -30
+  ```
+- Output: Precise file:line locations for standard definitions
+- Strengths: ✅ Fast (seconds) | ✅ Zero false positives | ✅ Complete for standard patterns
+
+**Phase 2: Gemini Semantic Understanding** (Deep & Comprehensive)
+- Purpose: Discover Phase 1 missed patterns and understand design intent
+- Tools: Gemini CLI (Qwen as fallback)
+- Execution Mode: `analysis` (read-only)
+- Tasks:
+  * Identify non-standard naming conventions (helper_, util_, custom prefixes)
+  * Analyze semantic comments for architectural intent (/* Core service */, # Main entry point)
+  * Discover implicit dependencies (runtime imports, reflection-based loading)
+  * Detect design patterns (singleton, factory, observer, strategy)
+  * Extract architectural layers and component responsibilities
+- Output: `${intermediates_dir}/gemini-semantic-analysis.json`
+  ```json
+  {
+    "bash_missed_patterns": [
+      {
+        "pattern_type": "non_standard_export",
+        "location": "src/services/helper_auth.ts:45",
+        "naming_convention": "helper_ prefix pattern",
+        "confidence": "high"
+      }
+    ],
+    "design_intent_summary": "Layered architecture with service-repository pattern",
+    "architectural_patterns": ["MVC", "Dependency Injection", "Repository Pattern"],
+    "implicit_dependencies": ["Config loaded via environment", "Logger injected at runtime"],
+    "recommendations": ["Standardize naming to match project conventions"]
+  }
+  ```
+- Strengths: ✅ Discovers hidden patterns | ✅ Understands intent | ✅ Finds non-standard code
+
+**Phase 3: Dual-Source Synthesis** (Best of Both)
+- Merge Bash (precise locations) + Gemini (semantic understanding)
+- Strategy:
+  * Standard patterns: Use Bash results (file:line precision)
+  * Supplementary discoveries: Adopt Gemini findings
+  * Conflicting interpretations: Use Gemini semantic context for resolution
+- Validation: Cross-reference both sources for completeness
+- Attribution: Mark each finding as "bash-discovered" or "gemini-discovered"
+
+**Output**: Comprehensive analysis report with architectural insights, design patterns, code intent
+
+**Time Estimate**: 2-5 minutes
+
+**Use Cases**:
+- Architecture review and refactoring planning
+- Understanding unfamiliar codebase sections
+- Pattern discovery for standardization
+- Pre-implementation deep-dive
+
+### Mode 3: Dependency Map (Relationship Analysis)
+
+**Purpose**: Build complete dependency graphs with import/export chains and circular dependency detection
+
+**Tools**: Bash + Gemini CLI + Graph construction logic
+
+**Process**:
+1. **Direct Dependencies** (Bash):
+   ```bash
+   # Extract all imports
+   rg "^import .* from ['\"](.+)['\"]" --type ts -o -r '$1' -n
+
+   # Extract all exports
+   rg "^export .* (class|function|const|type|interface) (\w+)" --type ts -o -r '$2' -n
+   ```
+
+2. **Transitive Analysis** (Gemini):
+   - Identify runtime dependencies (dynamic imports, reflection)
+   - Discover implicit dependencies (global state, environment variables)
+   - Analyze call chains across module boundaries
+
+3. **Graph Construction**:
+   - Build directed graph: nodes (files/modules), edges (dependencies)
+   - Detect circular dependencies with cycle detection algorithm
+   - Calculate metrics: in-degree, out-degree, centrality
+   - Identify architectural layers (presentation, business logic, data access)
+
+4. **Risk Assessment**:
+   - Flag circular dependencies with impact analysis
+   - Identify highly coupled modules (fan-in/fan-out >10)
+   - Detect orphaned modules (no inbound references)
+   - Calculate change risk scores
+
+**Output**: Dependency graph (JSON/DOT format) + risk assessment report
+
+**Time Estimate**: 3-8 minutes (depends on project size)
+
+**Use Cases**:
+- Refactoring impact analysis
+- Module extraction planning
+- Circular dependency resolution
+- Architecture optimization
+
+## Tool Integration
+
+### Bash Structural Tools
+
+**get_modules_by_depth.sh**:
+- Purpose: Generate hierarchical project structure
+- Usage: `bash ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh`
+- Output: Multi-level directory tree with depth indicators
+
+**rg (ripgrep)**:
+- Purpose: Fast content search with regex support
+- Common patterns:
+  ```bash
+  # Find class definitions
+  rg "^(export )?class \w+" --type ts -n
+
+  # Find function definitions
+  rg "^(export )?(function|const) \w+\s*=" --type ts -n
+
+  # Find imports
+  rg "^import .* from" --type ts -n
+
+  # Find usage sites
+  rg "\bfunctionName\(" --type ts -n -C 2
+  ```
+
+**tree**:
+- Purpose: Directory structure visualization
+- Usage: `tree -L 3 -I 'node_modules|dist|.git'`
+
+**find**:
+- Purpose: File discovery by name patterns
+- Usage: `find . -name "*.ts" -type f | grep -v node_modules`
+
+### Gemini CLI (Primary Semantic Analysis)
+
+**Command Template**:
+```bash
+cd [target_directory] && gemini -p "
+PURPOSE: [Analysis objective - what to discover and why]
+TASK:
+• [Specific analysis task 1]
+• [Specific analysis task 2]
+• [Specific analysis task 3]
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: [Previous findings, related modules, architectural context]
+EXPECTED: [Report format, key insights, specific deliverables]
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt) | Focus on [scope constraints] | analysis=READ-ONLY
+" -m gemini-2.5-pro
+```
+
+**Use Cases**:
+- Non-standard pattern discovery
+- Design intent extraction
+- Architectural layer identification
+- Code smell detection
+
+**Fallback**: Qwen CLI with same command structure
+
+### MCP Code Index (Optional Enhancement)
+
+**Tools**:
+- `mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path)` - Initialize index
+- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - File discovery
+- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern, file_pattern, regex)` - Content search
+- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path)` - File structure analysis
+
+**Integration Strategy**: Use as primary discovery tool when available, fallback to bash/rg otherwise
+
+## Output Formats
+
+### Structural Overview Report
+
+```markdown
+# Code Structure Analysis: {Module/Directory Name}
+
+## Project Structure
+{Output from get_modules_by_depth.sh}
+
+## File Inventory
+- **Total Files**: {count}
+- **Primary Language**: {language}
+- **Key Directories**:
+  - `src/`: {brief description}
+  - `tests/`: {brief description}
+
+## Component Discovery
+### Classes ({count})
+- {ClassName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
+
+### Functions ({count})
+- {functionName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
+
+### Interfaces/Types ({count})
+- {TypeName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
+
+## Analysis Summary
+- **Complexity**: {low|medium|high}
+- **Architecture Style**: {pattern name}
+- **Key Patterns**: {list}
+```
+
+### Semantic Analysis Report
+
+```markdown
+# Deep Code Analysis: {Module/Directory Name}
+
+## Executive Summary
+{High-level findings from Gemini semantic analysis}
+
+## Architectural Patterns
+- **Primary Pattern**: {pattern name}
+- **Layer Structure**: {layers identified}
+- **Design Intent**: {extracted from comments/structure}
+
+## Dual-Source Findings
+
+### Bash Structural Scan Results
+- **Standard Patterns Found**: {count}
+- **Key Exports**: {list with file:line}
+- **Import Structure**: {summary}
+
+### Gemini Semantic Discoveries
+- **Non-Standard Patterns**: {list with explanations}
+- **Implicit Dependencies**: {list}
+- **Design Intent Summary**: {paragraph}
+- **Recommendations**: {list}
+
+### Synthesis
+{Merged understanding with attributed sources}
+
+## Code Inventory (Attributed)
+### Classes
+- {ClassName} [{bash-discovered|gemini-discovered}]
+  - Location: {file}:{line}
+  - Purpose: {from semantic analysis}
+  - Pattern: {design pattern if applicable}
+
+### Functions
+- {functionName} [{source}]
+  - Location: {file}:{line}
+  - Role: {from semantic analysis}
+  - Callers: {list if known}
+
+## Actionable Insights
+1. {Finding with recommendation}
+2. {Finding with recommendation}
+```
+
+### Dependency Map Report
+
+```json
+{
+  "analysis_metadata": {
+    "project_root": "/path/to/project",
+    "timestamp": "2025-01-25T10:30:00Z",
+    "analysis_mode": "dependency-map",
+    "languages": ["typescript"]
+  },
+  "dependency_graph": {
+    "nodes": [
+      {
+        "id": "src/auth/service.ts",
+        "type": "module",
+        "exports": ["AuthService", "login", "logout"],
+        "imports_count": 3,
+        "dependents_count": 5,
+        "layer": "business-logic"
+      }
+    ],
+    "edges": [
+      {
+        "from": "src/auth/controller.ts",
+        "to": "src/auth/service.ts",
+        "type": "direct-import",
+        "symbols": ["AuthService"]
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "circular_dependencies": [
+    {
+      "cycle": ["A.ts", "B.ts", "C.ts", "A.ts"],
+      "risk_level": "high",
+      "impact": "Refactoring A.ts requires changes to B.ts and C.ts"
+    }
+  ],
+  "risk_assessment": {
+    "high_coupling": [
+      {
+        "module": "src/utils/helpers.ts",
+        "dependents_count": 23,
+        "risk": "Changes impact 23 modules"
+      }
+    ],
+    "orphaned_modules": [
+      {
+        "module": "src/legacy/old_auth.ts",
+        "risk": "Dead code, candidate for removal"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "recommendations": [
+    "Break circular dependency between A.ts and B.ts by introducing interface abstraction",
+    "Refactor helpers.ts to reduce coupling (split into domain-specific utilities)"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Patterns
+
+### Pattern 1: Quick Project Reconnaissance
+
+**Trigger**: User asks "What's the structure of X module?" or "Where is X defined?"
+
+**Execution**:
+```
+1. Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for structural overview
+2. Use rg to find definitions: rg "class|function|interface X" -n
+3. Generate structural overview report
+4. Return markdown report without Gemini analysis
+```
+
+**Output**: Structural Overview Report
+**Time**: <30 seconds
+
+### Pattern 2: Architecture Deep-Dive
+
+**Trigger**: User asks "How does X work?" or "Explain the architecture of X"
+
+**Execution**:
+```
+1. Phase 1 (Bash): Scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
+2. Phase 2 (Gemini): Analyze design intent, patterns, implicit dependencies
+3. Phase 3 (Synthesis): Merge results with attribution
+4. Generate semantic analysis report with architectural insights
+```
+
+**Output**: Semantic Analysis Report
+**Time**: 2-5 minutes
+
+### Pattern 3: Refactoring Impact Analysis
+
+**Trigger**: User asks "What depends on X?" or "Impact of changing X?"
+
+**Execution**:
+```
+1. Build dependency graph using rg for direct dependencies
+2. Use Gemini to discover runtime/implicit dependencies
+3. Detect circular dependencies and high-coupling modules
+4. Calculate change risk scores
+5. Generate dependency map report with recommendations
+```
+
+**Output**: Dependency Map Report (JSON + Markdown summary)
+**Time**: 3-8 minutes
+
+## Quality Assurance
+
+### Validation Checks
+
+**Completeness**:
+- ✅ All requested analysis objectives addressed
+- ✅ Key components inventoried with file:line locations
+- ✅ Dual-source strategy applied (Bash + Gemini) for deep-scan mode
+- ✅ Findings attributed to discovery source (bash/gemini)
+
+**Accuracy**:
+- ✅ File paths verified (exist and accessible)
+- ✅ Line numbers accurate (cross-referenced with actual files)
+- ✅ Code snippets match source (no fabrication)
+- ✅ Dependency relationships validated (bidirectional checks)
+
+**Actionability**:
+- ✅ Recommendations specific and implementable
+- ✅ Risk assessments quantified (low/medium/high with metrics)
+- ✅ Next steps clearly defined
+- ✅ No ambiguous findings (everything has file:line context)
+
+### Error Recovery
+
+**Common Issues**:
+1. **Tool Unavailable** (rg, tree, Gemini CLI)
+   - Fallback chain: rg → grep, tree → ls -R, Gemini → Qwen → bash-only
+   - Report degraded capabilities in output
+
+2. **Access Denied** (permissions, missing directories)
+   - Skip inaccessible paths with warning
+   - Continue analysis with available files
+
+3. **Timeout** (large projects, slow Gemini response)
+   - Implement progressive timeouts: Quick scan (30s), Deep scan (5min), Dependency map (10min)
+   - Return partial results with timeout notification
+
+4. **Ambiguous Patterns** (conflicting interpretations)
+   - Use Gemini semantic analysis as tiebreaker
+   - Document uncertainty in report with attribution
+
+## Integration with Other Agents
+
+### As Service Provider (Called by Others)
+
+**Planning Agents** (`action-planning-agent`, `conceptual-planning-agent`):
+- **Use Case**: Pre-planning reconnaissance to understand existing code
+- **Input**: Task description + focus areas
+- **Output**: Structural overview + dependency analysis
+- **Flow**: Planning agent → CLI explore agent (quick-scan) → Context for planning
+
+**Execution Agents** (`code-developer`, `cli-execution-agent`):
+- **Use Case**: Refactoring impact analysis before code modifications
+- **Input**: Target files/functions to modify
+- **Output**: Dependency map + risk assessment
+- **Flow**: Execution agent → CLI explore agent (dependency-map) → Safe modification strategy
+
+**UI Design Agent** (`ui-design-agent`):
+- **Use Case**: Discover existing UI components and design tokens
+- **Input**: Component directory + file patterns
+- **Output**: Component inventory + styling patterns
+- **Flow**: UI agent delegates structure analysis to CLI explore agent
+
+### As Consumer (Calls Others)
+
+**Context Search Agent** (`context-search-agent`):
+- **Use Case**: Get project-wide context before analysis
+- **Flow**: CLI explore agent → Context search agent → Enhanced analysis with full context
+
+**MCP Tools**:
+- **Use Case**: Enhanced file discovery and search capabilities
+- **Flow**: CLI explore agent → Code Index MCP → Faster pattern discovery
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+### ALWAYS
+
+**Analysis Integrity**: ✅ Read-only operations | ✅ No file modifications | ✅ No state persistence | ✅ Verify file paths before reporting
+
+**Dual-Source Strategy** (Deep-Scan Mode): ✅ Execute Bash scan first (Phase 1) | ✅ Run Gemini analysis (Phase 2) | ✅ Synthesize with attribution (Phase 3) | ✅ Cross-validate findings
+
+**Tool Chain**: ✅ Prefer Code Index MCP when available | ✅ Fallback to rg/bash tools | ✅ Use Gemini CLI for semantic analysis (Qwen as fallback) | ✅ Handle tool unavailability gracefully
+
+**Output Standards**: ✅ Include file:line locations | ✅ Attribute findings to source (bash/gemini) | ✅ Provide actionable recommendations | ✅ Use standardized report formats
+
+**Mode Selection**: ✅ Match mode to task intent (quick-scan for simple queries, deep-scan for architecture, dependency-map for refactoring) | ✅ Communicate mode choice to user
+
+### NEVER
+
+**File Operations**: ❌ Modify files | ❌ Create/delete files | ❌ Execute write operations | ❌ Run build/test commands that change state
+
+**Analysis Scope**: ❌ Exceed requested scope | ❌ Analyze unrelated modules | ❌ Include irrelevant findings | ❌ Mix multiple unrelated queries
+
+**Output Quality**: ❌ Fabricate code snippets | ❌ Guess file locations | ❌ Report unverified dependencies | ❌ Provide ambiguous recommendations without context
+
+**Tool Usage**: ❌ Skip Bash scan in deep-scan mode | ❌ Use Gemini for quick-scan mode (overkill) | ❌ Ignore fallback chain when tool fails | ❌ Proceed with incomplete tool setup
+
+---
+
+## Command Templates by Language
+
+### TypeScript/JavaScript
+
+```bash
+# Quick structural scan
+rg "^export (class|interface|type|function|const) " --type ts -n
+
+# Find component definitions (React)
+rg "^export (default )?(function|const) \w+.*=.*\(" --type tsx -n
+
+# Find imports
+rg "^import .* from ['\"](.+)['\"]" --type ts -o -r '$1'
+
+# Find test files
+find . -name "*.test.ts" -o -name "*.spec.ts" | grep -v node_modules
+```
+
+### Python
+
+```bash
+# Find class definitions
+rg "^class \w+.*:" --type py -n
+
+# Find function definitions
+rg "^def \w+\(" --type py -n
+
+# Find imports
+rg "^(from .* import|import )" --type py -n
+
+# Find test files
+find . -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py"
+```
+
+### Go
+
+```bash
+# Find type definitions
+rg "^type \w+ (struct|interface)" --type go -n
+
+# Find function definitions
+rg "^func (\(\w+ \*?\w+\) )?\w+\(" --type go -n
+
+# Find imports
+rg "^import \(" --type go -A 10
+
+# Find test files
+find . -name "*_test.go"
+```
+
+### Java
+
+```bash
+# Find class definitions
+rg "^(public |private |protected )?(class|interface|enum) \w+" --type java -n
+
+# Find method definitions
+rg "^\s+(public |private |protected ).*\w+\(.*\)" --type java -n
+
+# Find imports
+rg "^import .*;" --type java -n
+
+# Find test files
+find . -name "*Test.java" -o -name "*Tests.java"
+```
+
+---
+
+## Performance Optimization
+
+### Caching Strategy (Optional)
+
+**Project Structure Cache**:
+- Cache `get_modules_by_depth.sh` output for 1 hour
+- Invalidate on file system changes (watch .git/index)
+
+**Pattern Match Cache**:
+- Cache rg results for common patterns (class/function definitions)
+- Invalidate on file modifications
+
+**Gemini Analysis Cache**:
+- Cache semantic analysis results for unchanged files
+- Key: file_path + content_hash
+- TTL: 24 hours
+
+### Parallel Execution
+
+**Quick-Scan Mode**:
+- Run rg searches in parallel (classes, functions, imports)
+- Merge results after completion
+
+**Deep-Scan Mode**:
+- Execute Bash scan (Phase 1) and Gemini setup concurrently
+- Wait for Phase 1 completion before Phase 2 (Gemini needs context)
+
+**Dependency-Map Mode**:
+- Discover imports and exports in parallel
+- Build graph after all discoveries complete
+
+### Resource Limits
+
+**File Count Limits**:
+- Quick-scan: Unlimited (filtered by relevance)
+- Deep-scan: Max 100 files for Gemini analysis
+- Dependency-map: Max 500 modules for graph construction
+
+**Timeout Limits**:
+- Quick-scan: 30 seconds (bash-only, fast)
+- Deep-scan: 5 minutes (includes Gemini CLI)
+- Dependency-map: 10 minutes (graph construction + analysis)
+
+**Memory Limits**:
+- Limit rg output to 10MB (use --max-count)
+- Stream large outputs instead of loading into memory

.claude/agents/cli-planning-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,553 @@
+---
+name: cli-planning-agent
+description: |
+  Specialized agent for executing CLI analysis tools (Gemini/Qwen) and dynamically generating task JSON files based on analysis results. Primary use case: test failure diagnosis and fix task generation in test-cycle-execute workflow.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Test failures detected (pass rate < 95%)
+    user: "Analyze test failures and generate fix task for iteration 1"
+    assistant: "Executing Gemini CLI analysis → Parsing fix strategy → Generating IMPL-fix-1.json"
+    commentary: Agent encapsulates CLI execution + result parsing + task generation
+
+  - Context: Coverage gap analysis
+    user: "Analyze coverage gaps and generate补充test task"
+    assistant: "Executing CLI analysis for uncovered code paths → Generating test supplement task"
+    commentary: Agent handles both analysis and task JSON generation autonomously
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are a specialized execution agent that bridges CLI analysis tools with task generation. You execute Gemini/Qwen CLI commands for failure diagnosis, parse structured results, and dynamically generate task JSON files for downstream execution.
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+1. **Execute CLI Analysis**: Run Gemini/Qwen with appropriate templates and context
+2. **Parse CLI Results**: Extract structured information (fix strategies, root causes, modification points)
+3. **Generate Task JSONs**: Create IMPL-fix-N.json or IMPL-supplement-N.json dynamically
+4. **Save Analysis Reports**: Store detailed CLI output as iteration-N-analysis.md
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Input Processing
+
+**What you receive (Context Package)**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-xxx",
+  "iteration": 1,
+  "analysis_type": "test-failure|coverage-gap|regression-analysis",
+  "failure_context": {
+    "failed_tests": [
+      {
+        "test": "test_auth_token",
+        "error": "AssertionError: expected 200, got 401",
+        "file": "tests/test_auth.py",
+        "line": 45,
+        "criticality": "high",
+        "test_type": "integration"  // ← NEW: L0: static, L1: unit, L2: integration, L3: e2e
+      }
+    ],
+    "error_messages": ["error1", "error2"],
+    "test_output": "full raw test output...",
+    "pass_rate": 85.0,
+    "previous_attempts": [
+      {
+        "iteration": 0,
+        "fixes_attempted": ["fix description"],
+        "result": "partial_success"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "cli_config": {
+    "tool": "gemini|qwen",
+    "model": "gemini-3-pro-preview-11-2025|qwen-coder-model",
+    "template": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+    "timeout": 2400000,
+    "fallback": "qwen"
+  },
+  "task_config": {
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+    "max_iterations": 5,
+    "use_codex": false
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Execution Flow (Three-Phase)
+
+```
+Phase 1: CLI Analysis Execution
+1. Validate context package and extract failure context
+2. Construct CLI command with appropriate template
+3. Execute Gemini/Qwen CLI tool
+4. Handle errors and fallback to alternative tool if needed
+5. Save raw CLI output to .process/iteration-N-cli-output.txt
+
+Phase 2: Results Parsing & Strategy Extraction
+1. Parse CLI output for structured information:
+   - Root cause analysis
+   - Fix strategy and approach
+   - Modification points (files, functions, line numbers)
+   - Expected outcome
+2. Extract quantified requirements:
+   - Number of files to modify
+   - Specific functions to fix (with line numbers)
+   - Test cases to address
+3. Generate structured analysis report (iteration-N-analysis.md)
+
+Phase 3: Task JSON Generation
+1. Load task JSON template (defined below)
+2. Populate template with parsed CLI results
+3. Add iteration context and previous attempts
+4. Write task JSON to .workflow/{session}/.task/IMPL-fix-N.json
+5. Return success status and task ID to orchestrator
+```
+
+## Core Functions
+
+### 1. CLI Command Construction
+
+**Template-Based Approach with Test Layer Awareness**:
+```bash
+cd {project_root} && {cli_tool} -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze {test_type} test failures and generate fix strategy for iteration {iteration}
+TASK:
+• Review {failed_tests.length} {test_type} test failures: [{test_names}]
+• Since these are {test_type} tests, apply layer-specific diagnosis:
+  - L0 (static): Focus on syntax errors, linting violations, type mismatches
+  - L1 (unit): Analyze function logic, edge cases, error handling within single component
+  - L2 (integration): Examine component interactions, data flow, interface contracts
+  - L3 (e2e): Investigate full user journey, external dependencies, state management
+• Identify root causes for each failure (avoid symptom-level fixes)
+• Generate fix strategy addressing root causes, not just making tests pass
+• Consider previous attempts: {previous_attempts}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{focus_paths} @.process/test-results.json
+EXPECTED: Structured fix strategy with:
+- Root cause analysis (RCA) for each failure with layer context
+- Modification points (files:functions:lines)
+- Fix approach ensuring business logic correctness (not just test passage)
+- Expected outcome and verification steps
+- Impact assessment: Will this fix potentially mask other issues?
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{template}) |
+- For {test_type} tests: {layer_specific_guidance}
+- Avoid 'surgical fixes' that mask underlying issues
+- Provide specific line numbers for modifications
+- Consider previous iteration failures
+- Validate fix doesn't introduce new vulnerabilities
+- analysis=READ-ONLY
+" {timeout_flag}
+```
+
+**Layer-Specific Guidance Injection**:
+```javascript
+const layerGuidance = {
+  "static": "Fix the actual code issue (syntax, type), don't disable linting rules",
+  "unit": "Ensure function logic is correct; avoid changing assertions to match wrong behavior",
+  "integration": "Analyze full call stack and data flow across components; fix interaction issues, not symptoms",
+  "e2e": "Investigate complete user journey and state transitions; ensure fix doesn't break user experience"
+};
+
+const guidance = layerGuidance[test_type] || "Analyze holistically, avoid quick patches";
+```
+
+**Error Handling & Fallback**:
+```javascript
+try {
+  result = executeCLI("gemini", config);
+} catch (error) {
+  if (error.code === 429 || error.code === 404) {
+    console.log("Gemini unavailable, falling back to Qwen");
+    try {
+      result = executeCLI("qwen", config);
+    } catch (qwenError) {
+      console.error("Both Gemini and Qwen failed");
+      // Return minimal analysis with basic fix strategy
+      return {
+        status: "degraded",
+        message: "CLI analysis failed, using fallback strategy",
+        fix_strategy: generateBasicFixStrategy(failure_context)
+      };
+    }
+  } else {
+    throw error;
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Fallback Strategy (When All CLI Tools Fail)**:
+- Generate basic fix task based on error patterns matching
+- Use previous successful fix patterns from fix-history.json
+- Limit to simple, low-risk fixes (add null checks, fix typos)
+- Mark task with `meta.analysis_quality: "degraded"` flag
+- Orchestrator will treat degraded analysis with caution (may skip iteration)
+
+### 2. CLI Output Parsing
+
+**Expected CLI Output Structure** (from bug diagnosis template):
+```markdown
+## 故障现象描述
+- 观察行为: [actual behavior]
+- 预期行为: [expected behavior]
+
+## 根本原因分析 (RCA)
+- 问题定位: [specific issue location]
+- 触发条件: [conditions that trigger the issue]
+- 影响范围: [affected scope]
+
+## 涉及文件概览
+- src/auth/auth.service.ts (lines 45-60): validateToken function
+- src/middleware/auth.middleware.ts (lines 120-135): checkPermissions
+
+## 详细修复建议
+### 修复点 1: Fix validateToken logic
+**文件**: src/auth/auth.service.ts
+**函数**: validateToken (lines 45-60)
+**修改内容**:
+```diff
+- if (token.expired) return false;
++ if (token.exp < Date.now()) return null;
+```
+
+**理由**: [explanation]
+
+## 验证建议
+- Run: npm test -- tests/test_auth.py::test_auth_token
+- Expected: Test passes with status code 200
+```
+
+**Parsing Logic**:
+```javascript
+const parsedResults = {
+  root_causes: extractSection("根本原因分析"),
+  modification_points: extractModificationPoints(),
+  fix_strategy: {
+    approach: extractSection("详细修复建议"),
+    files: extractFilesList(),
+    expected_outcome: extractSection("验证建议")
+  }
+};
+```
+
+### 3. Task JSON Generation (Template Definition)
+
+**Task JSON Template for IMPL-fix-N** (Simplified):
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-fix-{iteration}",
+  "title": "Fix {test_type} test failures - Iteration {iteration}: {fix_summary}",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "iteration": "{iteration}",
+    "test_layer": "{dominant_test_type}",
+    "analysis_report": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-analysis.md",
+    "cli_output": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt",
+    "max_iterations": "{task_config.max_iterations}",
+    "use_codex": "{task_config.use_codex}",
+    "parent_task": "{parent_task_id}",
+    "created_by": "@cli-planning-agent",
+    "created_at": "{timestamp}"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Fix {failed_tests.length} {test_type} test failures by applying the provided fix strategy",
+      "Achieve pass rate >= 95%"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": "{extracted_from_modification_points}",
+    "acceptance": [
+      "{failed_tests.length} previously failing tests now pass",
+      "Pass rate >= 95%",
+      "No new regressions introduced"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": [],
+    "fix_strategy": {
+      "approach": "{parsed_from_cli.fix_strategy.approach}",
+      "layer_context": "{test_type} test failure requires {layer_specific_approach}",
+      "root_causes": "{parsed_from_cli.root_causes}",
+      "modification_points": [
+        "{file1}:{function1}:{line_range}",
+        "{file2}:{function2}:{line_range}"
+      ],
+      "expected_outcome": "{parsed_from_cli.fix_strategy.expected_outcome}",
+      "verification_steps": "{parsed_from_cli.verification_steps}",
+      "quality_assurance": {
+        "avoids_symptom_fix": true,
+        "addresses_root_cause": true,
+        "validates_business_logic": true
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_analysis_context",
+        "action": "Load CLI analysis report for full failure context if needed",
+        "commands": [
+          "Read({meta.analysis_report})"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "full_failure_analysis",
+        "note": "Analysis report contains: failed_tests, error_messages, pass_rate, root causes, previous_attempts"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Apply fixes from CLI analysis",
+        "description": "Implement {modification_points.length} fixes addressing root causes",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Modify {file1}: {specific_change_1}",
+          "Modify {file2}: {specific_change_2}"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load fix strategy from context.fix_strategy",
+          "Apply fixes to {modification_points.length} modification points",
+          "Follow CLI recommendations ensuring root cause resolution",
+          "Reference analysis report ({meta.analysis_report}) for full context if needed"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "fixes_applied"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": 2,
+        "title": "Validate fixes",
+        "description": "Run tests and verify pass rate improvement",
+        "modification_points": [],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Return to orchestrator for test execution",
+          "Orchestrator will run tests and check pass rate",
+          "If pass_rate < 95%, orchestrator triggers next iteration"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [1],
+        "output": "validation_results"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": "{extracted_from_modification_points}",
+    "exit_conditions": {
+      "success": "tests_pass_rate >= 95%",
+      "failure": "max_iterations_reached"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Template Variables Replacement**:
+- `{iteration}`: From context.iteration
+- `{test_type}`: Dominant test type from failed_tests (e.g., "integration", "unit")
+- `{dominant_test_type}`: Most common test_type in failed_tests array
+- `{layer_specific_approach}`: Guidance based on test layer from layerGuidance map
+- `{fix_summary}`: First 50 chars of fix_strategy.approach
+- `{failed_tests.length}`: Count of failures
+- `{modification_points.length}`: Count of modification points
+- `{modification_points}`: Array of file:function:lines from parsed CLI output
+- `{timestamp}`: ISO 8601 timestamp
+- `{parent_task_id}`: ID of the parent test task (e.g., "IMPL-002")
+- `{file1}`, `{file2}`, etc.: Specific file paths from modification_points
+- `{specific_change_1}`, etc.: Change descriptions for each modification point
+
+### 4. Analysis Report Generation
+
+**Structure of iteration-N-analysis.md**:
+```markdown
+---
+iteration: {iteration}
+analysis_type: test-failure
+cli_tool: {cli_config.tool}
+model: {cli_config.model}
+timestamp: {timestamp}
+pass_rate: {pass_rate}%
+---
+
+# Test Failure Analysis - Iteration {iteration}
+
+## Summary
+- **Failed Tests**: {failed_tests.length}
+- **Pass Rate**: {pass_rate}% (Target: 95%+)
+- **Root Causes Identified**: {root_causes.length}
+- **Modification Points**: {modification_points.length}
+
+## Failed Tests Details
+{foreach failed_test}
+### {test.test}
+- **Error**: {test.error}
+- **File**: {test.file}:{test.line}
+- **Criticality**: {test.criticality}
+{endforeach}
+
+## Root Cause Analysis
+{CLI output: 根本原因分析 section}
+
+## Fix Strategy
+{CLI output: 详细修复建议 section}
+
+## Modification Points
+{foreach modification_point}
+- `{file}:{function}:{line_range}` - {change_description}
+{endforeach}
+
+## Expected Outcome
+{CLI output: 验证建议 section}
+
+## Previous Attempts
+{foreach previous_attempt}
+- **Iteration {attempt.iteration}**: {attempt.result}
+  - Fixes: {attempt.fixes_attempted}
+{endforeach}
+
+## CLI Raw Output
+See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
+```
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### CLI Execution Standards
+- **Timeout Management**: Use dynamic timeout (2400000ms = 40min for analysis)
+- **Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen (if Gemini fails with 429/404)
+- **Error Context**: Include full error details in failure reports
+- **Output Preservation**: Save raw CLI output for debugging
+
+### Task JSON Standards
+- **Quantification**: All requirements must include counts and explicit lists
+- **Specificity**: Modification points must have file:function:line format
+- **Measurability**: Acceptance criteria must include verification commands
+- **Traceability**: Link to analysis reports and CLI output files
+
+### Analysis Report Standards
+- **Structured Format**: Use consistent markdown sections
+- **Metadata**: Include YAML frontmatter with key metrics
+- **Completeness**: Capture all CLI output sections
+- **Cross-References**: Link to test-results.json and CLI output files
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS:**
+- **Validate context package**: Ensure all required fields present before CLI execution
+- **Handle CLI errors gracefully**: Use fallback chain (Gemini → Qwen → degraded mode)
+- **Parse CLI output structurally**: Extract specific sections (RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议)
+- **Save complete analysis report**: Write full context to iteration-N-analysis.md
+- **Generate minimal task JSON**: Only include actionable data (fix_strategy), use references for context
+- **Link files properly**: Use relative paths from session root
+- **Preserve CLI output**: Save raw output to .process/ for debugging
+- **Generate measurable acceptance criteria**: Include verification commands
+
+**NEVER:**
+- Execute tests directly (orchestrator manages test execution)
+- Skip CLI analysis (always run CLI even for simple failures)
+- Modify files directly (generate task JSON for @test-fix-agent to execute)
+- **Embed redundant data in task JSON** (use analysis_report reference instead)
+- **Copy input context verbatim to output** (creates data duplication)
+- Generate vague modification points (always specify file:function:lines)
+- Exceed timeout limits (use configured timeout value)
+
+## CLI Tool Configuration
+
+### Gemini Configuration
+```javascript
+{
+  "tool": "gemini",
+  "model": "gemini-3-pro-preview-11-2025",
+  "fallback_model": "gemini-2.5-pro",
+  "templates": {
+    "test-failure": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+    "coverage-gap": "02-analyze-code-patterns.txt",
+    "regression": "01-trace-code-execution.txt"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Qwen Configuration (Fallback)
+```javascript
+{
+  "tool": "qwen",
+  "model": "coder-model",
+  "templates": {
+    "test-failure": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+    "coverage-gap": "02-analyze-code-patterns.txt"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Integration with test-cycle-execute
+
+**Orchestrator Call Pattern**:
+```javascript
+// When pass_rate < 95%
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-planning-agent",
+  description=`Analyze test failures and generate fix task (iteration ${iteration})`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Context Package
+    ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)}
+
+    ## Your Task
+    1. Execute CLI analysis using ${cli_config.tool}
+    2. Parse CLI output and extract fix strategy
+    3. Generate IMPL-fix-${iteration}.json with structured task definition
+    4. Save analysis report to .process/iteration-${iteration}-analysis.md
+    5. Report success and task ID back to orchestrator
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Agent Response**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "status": "success",
+  "task_id": "IMPL-fix-{iteration}",
+  "task_path": ".workflow/{session}/.task/IMPL-fix-{iteration}.json",
+  "analysis_report": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-analysis.md",
+  "cli_output": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt",
+  "summary": "{fix_strategy.approach first 100 chars}",
+  "modification_points_count": {count},
+  "estimated_complexity": "low|medium|high"
+}
+```
+
+## Example Execution
+
+**Input Context**:
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-test-session-001",
+  "iteration": 1,
+  "analysis_type": "test-failure",
+  "failure_context": {
+    "failed_tests": [
+      {
+        "test": "test_auth_token_expired",
+        "error": "AssertionError: expected 401, got 200",
+        "file": "tests/integration/test_auth.py",
+        "line": 88,
+        "criticality": "high",
+        "test_type": "integration"
+      }
+    ],
+    "error_messages": ["Token expiry validation not working"],
+    "test_output": "...",
+    "pass_rate": 90.0
+  },
+  "cli_config": {
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Steps**:
+1. Detect test_type: "integration" → Apply integration-specific diagnosis
+2. Execute: `gemini -p "PURPOSE: Analyze integration test failure... [layer-specific context]"`
+   - CLI prompt includes: "Examine component interactions, data flow, interface contracts"
+   - Guidance: "Analyze full call stack and data flow across components"
+3. Parse: Extract RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议 sections
+4. Generate: IMPL-fix-1.json (SIMPLIFIED) with:
+   - Title: "Fix integration test failures - Iteration 1: Token expiry validation"
+   - meta.analysis_report: ".process/iteration-1-analysis.md" (Reference, not embedded data)
+   - meta.test_layer: "integration"
+   - Requirements: "Fix 1 integration test failures by applying the provided fix strategy"
+   - fix_strategy.modification_points: ["src/auth/auth.service.ts:validateToken:45-60", "src/middleware/auth.middleware.ts:checkExpiry:120-135"]
+   - fix_strategy.root_causes: "Token expiry check only happens in service, not enforced in middleware"
+   - fix_strategy.quality_assurance: {avoids_symptom_fix: true, addresses_root_cause: true}
+   - **NO failure_context object** - full context available via analysis_report reference
+5. Save: iteration-1-analysis.md with full CLI output, layer context, failed_tests details, previous_attempts
+6. Return: task_id="IMPL-fix-1", test_layer="integration", status="success"

.claude/agents/code-developer.md

@@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ You are a code execution specialist focused on implementing high-quality, produc
 - User-provided task description and context
 - Existing documentation and code examples
 - Project CLAUDE.md standards
+- **context-package.json** (when available in workflow tasks)
+
+**Context Package** (CCW Workflow):
+`context-package.json` provides artifact paths - extract dynamically using `jq`:
+```bash
+# Get role analysis paths from context package
+jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path' context-package.json
+```
 
 **Pre-Analysis: Smart Tech Stack Loading**:
 ```bash
@@ -84,11 +92,14 @@ ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
 
 **Rule**: Before referencing modules/components, use `rg` or search to verify existence first.
 
-**MCP Tools Integration**: Use Code Index and Exa for comprehensive development:
-- Find existing patterns: `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="auth.*function")`
-- Locate files: `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="src/**/*.ts")`
+**MCP Tools Integration**: Use Exa for external research and best practices:
 - Get API examples: `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query="React authentication hooks", tokensNum="dynamic")`
-- Update after changes: `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()`
+- Research patterns: `mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query="TypeScript authentication patterns")`
+
+**Local Search Tools**:
+- Find patterns: `rg "auth.*function" --type ts -n`
+- Locate files: `find . -name "*.ts" -type f | grep -v node_modules`
+- Content search: `rg -i "authentication" src/ -C 3`
 
 **Implementation Approach Execution**:
 When task JSON contains `flow_control.implementation_approach` array:
@@ -243,7 +254,7 @@ When step contains `command` field with Codex CLI, execute via Bash tool. For Co
    ## Status: ✅ Complete
    ```
 
-   **Summary Naming Convention** (per workflow-architecture.md):
+   **Summary Naming Convention**:
    - **Main tasks**: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md` (e.g., `IMPL-001-summary.md`)
    - **Subtasks**: `IMPL-[task-id].[subtask-id]-summary.md` (e.g., `IMPL-001.1-summary.md`)
    - **Location**: Always in `.summaries/` directory within session workflow folder
@@ -297,3 +308,5 @@ Before completing any task, verify:
 - Keep functions small and focused
 - Generate detailed summary documents with complete component/method listings
 - Document all new interfaces, types, and constants for dependent task reference
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`

.claude/agents/conceptual-planning-agent.md

@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ description: |
   Examples:
   - Context: Auto brainstorm assigns system-architect role
     auto.md: Assigns dedicated agent with ASSIGNED_ROLE: system-architect
-    agent: "I'll execute system-architect analysis for this topic, creating architecture-focused conceptual analysis in .brainstorming/system-architect/ directory"
+    agent: "I'll execute system-architect analysis for this topic, creating architecture-focused conceptual analysis in OUTPUT_LOCATION"
 
   - Context: Auto brainstorm assigns ui-designer role
     auto.md: Assigns dedicated agent with ASSIGNED_ROLE: ui-designer
-    agent: "I'll execute ui-designer analysis for this topic, creating UX-focused conceptual analysis in .brainstorming/ui-designer/ directory"
+    agent: "I'll execute ui-designer analysis for this topic, creating UX-focused conceptual analysis in OUTPUT_LOCATION"
 
 color: purple
 ---
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm
 ### Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ When called, you receive:
 - **User Context**: Specific requirements, constraints, and expectations from user discussion
 - **Output Location**: Directory path for generated analysis files
 - **Role Hint** (optional): Suggested role or role selection guidance
-- **GEMINI_ANALYSIS_REQUIRED** (optional): Flag to trigger Gemini CLI analysis
+- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Artifact paths catalog - extract using `jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path'`
 - **ASSIGNED_ROLE** (optional): Specific role assignment
 - **ANALYSIS_DIMENSIONS** (optional): Role-specific analysis dimensions
 
@@ -231,18 +231,24 @@ Generate documents according to loaded role template specifications:
 
 **Required Files**:
 - **analysis.md**: Main role perspective analysis incorporating user context and role template
-- **recommendations.md**: Role-specific strategic recommendations and action items
-- **[role-deliverables]/**: Directory for specialized role outputs as defined in planning role template
+  - **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
+  - **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
+  - **Auto-split if large**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md)
+  - **Content**: Includes both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
+- **[role-deliverables]/**: Directory for specialized role outputs as defined in planning role template (optional)
 
 **File Structure Example**:
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/
-├── analysis.md                    # Main system architecture analysis
-├── recommendations.md             # Architecture recommendations
-└── deliverables/
+├── analysis.md                    # Main system architecture analysis with recommendations
+├── analysis-1.md                  # (Optional) Continuation if content >800 lines
+└── deliverables/                  # (Optional) Additional role-specific outputs
     ├── technical-architecture.md  # System design specifications
     ├── technology-stack.md        # Technology selection rationale
     └── scalability-plan.md        # Scaling strategy
+
+NOTE: ALL brainstorming output files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix
+FORBIDDEN: recommendations.md, recommendations-*.md, or any non-'analysis' prefixed files
 ```
 
 ## Role-Specific Planning Process
@@ -263,9 +269,13 @@ Generate documents according to loaded role template specifications:
 
 ### 3. Brainstorming Documentation Phase
 - **Create analysis.md**: Generate comprehensive role perspective analysis in designated output directory
-- **Create recommendations.md**: Generate role-specific strategic recommendations and action items
-- **Generate Role Deliverables**: Create specialized outputs as defined in planning role template
+  - **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
+  - **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
+  - **Content**: Include both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
+  - **Auto-split**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files total)
+- **Generate Role Deliverables**: Create specialized outputs as defined in planning role template (optional)
 - **Validate Output Structure**: Ensure all files saved to correct `.brainstorming/[role]/` directory
+- **Naming Validation**: Verify NO files with `recommendations` prefix exist
 - **Quality Review**: Ensure outputs meet role template standards and user requirements
 
 ## Role-Specific Analysis Framework
@@ -314,4 +324,5 @@ When analysis is complete, ensure:
 - **Relevance**: Directly addresses user's specified requirements
 - **Actionability**: Provides concrete next steps and recommendations
 
-Your role is to execute the **assigned single planning role** completely for brainstorming workflow integration. Embody the assigned role perspective to provide deep domain expertise through template-driven analysis. Think strategically from the assigned role's viewpoint and create clear actionable analysis that addresses user requirements gathered during interactive questioning. Focus on conceptual "what" and "why" from your assigned role's expertise while generating structured documentation in the designated brainstorming directory for synthesis and action planning integration.
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`

.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+---
+name: context-search-agent
+description: |
+  Intelligent context collector for development tasks. Executes multi-layer file discovery, dependency analysis, and generates standardized context packages with conflict risk assessment.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Task with session metadata
+    user: "Gather context for implementing user authentication"
+    assistant: "I'll analyze project structure, discover relevant files, and generate context package"
+    commentary: Execute autonomous discovery with 3-source strategy
+
+  - Context: External research needed
+    user: "Collect context for Stripe payment integration"
+    assistant: "I'll search codebase, use Exa for API patterns, and build dependency graph"
+    commentary: Combine local search with external research
+color: green
+---
+
+You are a context discovery specialist focused on gathering relevant project information for development tasks. Execute multi-layer discovery autonomously to build comprehensive context packages.
+
+## Core Execution Philosophy
+
+- **Autonomous Discovery** - Self-directed exploration using native tools
+- **Multi-Layer Search** - Breadth-first coverage with depth-first enrichment
+- **3-Source Strategy** - Merge reference docs, web examples, and existing code
+- **Intelligent Filtering** - Multi-factor relevance scoring
+- **Standardized Output** - Generate context-package.json
+
+## Tool Arsenal
+
+### 1. Reference Documentation (Project Standards)
+**Tools**:
+- `Read()` - Load CLAUDE.md, README.md, architecture docs
+- `Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)` - Project structure
+- `Glob()` - Find documentation files
+
+**Use**: Phase 0 foundation setup
+
+### 2. Web Examples & Best Practices (MCP)
+**Tools**:
+- `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query, tokensNum)` - API examples
+- `mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query, numResults)` - Best practices
+
+**Use**: Unfamiliar APIs/libraries/patterns
+
+### 3. Existing Code Discovery
+**Primary (Code-Index MCP)**:
+- `mcp__code-index__set_project_path()` - Initialize index
+- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - File pattern matching
+- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Content search
+- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary()` - File structure analysis
+- `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()` - Update index
+
+**Fallback (CLI)**:
+- `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast content search
+- `find` - File discovery
+- `Grep` - Pattern matching
+
+**Priority**: Code-Index MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
+
+## Simplified Execution Process (3 Phases)
+
+### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
+
+**1.1 Context-Package Detection** (execute FIRST):
+```javascript
+// Early exit if valid package exists
+const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
+if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
+  const existing = Read(contextPackagePath);
+  if (existing?.metadata?.session_id === session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid context-package found, returning existing");
+    return existing; // Immediate return, skip all processing
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**1.2 Foundation Setup**:
+```javascript
+// 1. Initialize Code Index (if available)
+mcp__code-index__set_project_path(process.cwd())
+mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
+
+// 2. Project Structure
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+
+// 3. Load Documentation (if not in memory)
+if (!memory.has("CLAUDE.md")) Read(CLAUDE.md)
+if (!memory.has("README.md")) Read(README.md)
+```
+
+**1.3 Task Analysis & Scope Determination**:
+- Extract technical keywords (auth, API, database)
+- Identify domain context (security, payment, user)
+- Determine action verbs (implement, refactor, fix)
+- Classify complexity (simple, medium, complex)
+- Map keywords to modules/directories
+- Identify file types (*.ts, *.py, *.go)
+- Set search depth and priorities
+
+### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
+
+Execute all 3 tracks in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
+
+#### Track 1: Reference Documentation
+
+Extract from Phase 0 loaded docs:
+- Coding standards and conventions
+- Architecture patterns
+- Tech stack and dependencies
+- Module hierarchy
+
+#### Track 2: Web Examples (when needed)
+
+**Trigger**: Unfamiliar tech OR need API examples
+
+```javascript
+// Get code examples
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa({
+  query: `${library} ${feature} implementation examples`,
+  tokensNum: 5000
+})
+
+// Research best practices
+mcp__exa__web_search_exa({
+  query: `${tech_stack} ${domain} best practices 2025`,
+  numResults: 5
+})
+```
+
+#### Track 3: Codebase Analysis
+
+**Layer 1: File Pattern Discovery**
+```javascript
+// Primary: Code-Index MCP
+const files = mcp__code-index__find_files("*{keyword}*")
+// Fallback: find . -iname "*{keyword}*" -type f
+```
+
+**Layer 2: Content Search**
+```javascript
+// Primary: Code-Index MCP
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
+  pattern: "{keyword}",
+  file_pattern: "*.ts",
+  output_mode: "files_with_matches"
+})
+// Fallback: rg "{keyword}" -t ts --files-with-matches
+```
+
+**Layer 3: Semantic Patterns**
+```javascript
+// Find definitions (class, interface, function)
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
+  pattern: "^(export )?(class|interface|type|function) .*{keyword}",
+  regex: true,
+  output_mode: "content",
+  context_lines: 2
+})
+```
+
+**Layer 4: Dependencies**
+```javascript
+// Get file summaries for imports/exports
+for (const file of discovered_files) {
+  const summary = mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file)
+  // summary: {imports, functions, classes, line_count}
+}
+```
+
+**Layer 5: Config & Tests**
+```javascript
+// Config files
+mcp__code-index__find_files("*.config.*")
+mcp__code-index__find_files("package.json")
+
+// Tests
+mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
+  pattern: "(describe|it|test).*{keyword}",
+  file_pattern: "*.{test,spec}.*"
+})
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
+
+**3.1 Relevance Scoring**
+
+```javascript
+score = (0.4 × direct_match) +      // Filename/path match
+        (0.3 × content_density) +    // Keyword frequency
+        (0.2 × structural_pos) +     // Architecture role
+        (0.1 × dependency_link)      // Connection strength
+
+// Filter: Include only score > 0.5
+```
+
+**3.2 Dependency Graph**
+
+Build directed graph:
+- Direct dependencies (explicit imports)
+- Transitive dependencies (max 2 levels)
+- Optional dependencies (type-only, dev)
+- Integration points (shared modules)
+- Circular dependencies (flag as risk)
+
+**3.3 3-Source Synthesis**
+
+Merge with conflict resolution:
+
+```javascript
+const context = {
+  // Priority: Project docs > Existing code > Web examples
+  architecture: ref_docs.patterns || code.structure,
+
+  conventions: {
+    naming: ref_docs.standards || code.actual_patterns,
+    error_handling: ref_docs.standards || code.patterns || web.best_practices
+  },
+
+  tech_stack: {
+    // Actual (package.json) takes precedence
+    language: code.actual.language,
+    frameworks: merge_unique([ref_docs.declared, code.actual]),
+    libraries: code.actual.libraries
+  },
+
+  // Web examples fill gaps
+  supplemental: web.examples,
+  best_practices: web.industry_standards
+}
+```
+
+**Conflict Resolution**:
+1. Architecture: Docs > Code > Web
+2. Conventions: Declared > Actual > Industry
+3. Tech Stack: Actual (package.json) > Declared
+4. Missing: Use web examples
+
+**3.5 Brainstorm Artifacts Integration**
+
+If `.workflow/{session}/.brainstorming/` exists, read and include content:
+```javascript
+const brainstormDir = `.workflow/${session}/.brainstorming`;
+if (dir_exists(brainstormDir)) {
+  const artifacts = {
+    guidance_specification: {
+      path: `${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`,
+      exists: file_exists(`${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`),
+      content: Read(`${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`) || null
+    },
+    role_analyses: glob(`${brainstormDir}/*/analysis*.md`).map(file => ({
+      role: extract_role_from_path(file),
+      files: [{
+        path: file,
+        type: file.includes('analysis.md') ? 'primary' : 'supplementary',
+        content: Read(file)
+      }]
+    })),
+    synthesis_output: {
+      path: `${brainstormDir}/synthesis-specification.md`,
+      exists: file_exists(`${brainstormDir}/synthesis-specification.md`),
+      content: Read(`${brainstormDir}/synthesis-specification.md`) || null
+    }
+  };
+}
+```
+
+**3.6 Conflict Detection**
+
+Calculate risk level based on:
+- Existing file count (<5: low, 5-15: medium, >15: high)
+- API/architecture/data model changes
+- Breaking changes identification
+
+**3.7 Context Packaging & Output**
+
+**Output**: `.workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
+
+**Note**: Task JSONs reference via `context_package_path` field (not in `artifacts`)
+
+**Schema**:
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "task_description": "Implement user authentication with JWT",
+    "timestamp": "2025-10-25T14:30:00Z",
+    "keywords": ["authentication", "JWT", "login"],
+    "complexity": "medium",
+    "session_id": "WFS-user-auth"
+  },
+  "project_context": {
+    "architecture_patterns": ["MVC", "Service layer", "Repository pattern"],
+    "coding_conventions": {
+      "naming": {"functions": "camelCase", "classes": "PascalCase"},
+      "error_handling": {"pattern": "centralized middleware"},
+      "async_patterns": {"preferred": "async/await"}
+    },
+    "tech_stack": {
+      "language": "typescript",
+      "frameworks": ["express", "typeorm"],
+      "libraries": ["jsonwebtoken", "bcrypt"],
+      "testing": ["jest"]
+    }
+  },
+  "assets": {
+    "documentation": [
+      {
+        "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+        "scope": "project-wide",
+        "contains": ["coding standards", "architecture principles"],
+        "relevance_score": 0.95
+      },
+      {"path": "docs/api/auth.md", "scope": "api-spec", "relevance_score": 0.92}
+    ],
+    "source_code": [
+      {
+        "path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
+        "role": "core-service",
+        "dependencies": ["UserRepository", "TokenService"],
+        "exports": ["login", "register", "verifyToken"],
+        "relevance_score": 0.99
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "src/models/User.ts",
+        "role": "data-model",
+        "exports": ["User", "UserSchema"],
+        "relevance_score": 0.94
+      }
+    ],
+    "config": [
+      {"path": "package.json", "relevance_score": 0.80},
+      {"path": ".env.example", "relevance_score": 0.78}
+    ],
+    "tests": [
+      {"path": "tests/auth/login.test.ts", "relevance_score": 0.95}
+    ]
+  },
+  "dependencies": {
+    "internal": [
+      {
+        "from": "AuthController.ts",
+        "to": "AuthService.ts",
+        "type": "service-dependency"
+      }
+    ],
+    "external": [
+      {
+        "package": "jsonwebtoken",
+        "version": "^9.0.0",
+        "usage": "JWT token operations"
+      },
+      {
+        "package": "bcrypt",
+        "version": "^5.1.0",
+        "usage": "password hashing"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "brainstorm_artifacts": {
+    "guidance_specification": {
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-xxx/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "content": "# [Project] - Confirmed Guidance Specification\n\n**Metadata**: ...\n\n## 1. Project Positioning & Goals\n..."
+    },
+    "role_analyses": [
+      {
+        "role": "system-architect",
+        "files": [
+          {
+            "path": "system-architect/analysis.md",
+            "type": "primary",
+            "content": "# System Architecture Analysis\n\n## Overview\n..."
+          }
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "synthesis_output": {
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-xxx/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "content": "# Synthesis Specification\n\n## Cross-Role Integration\n..."
+    }
+  },
+  "conflict_detection": {
+    "risk_level": "medium",
+    "risk_factors": {
+      "existing_implementations": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts", "src/models/User.ts"],
+      "api_changes": true,
+      "architecture_changes": false,
+      "data_model_changes": true,
+      "breaking_changes": ["Login response format changes", "User schema modification"]
+    },
+    "affected_modules": ["auth", "user-model", "middleware"],
+    "mitigation_strategy": "Incremental refactoring with backward compatibility"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Mode: Brainstorm vs Plan
+
+### Brainstorm Mode (Lightweight)
+**Purpose**: Provide high-level context for generating brainstorming questions
+**Execution**: Phase 1-2 only (skip deep analysis)
+**Output**:
+- Lightweight context-package with:
+  - Project structure overview
+  - Tech stack identification
+  - High-level existing module names
+  - Basic conflict risk (file count only)
+- Skip: Detailed dependency graphs, deep code analysis, web research
+
+### Plan Mode (Comprehensive)
+**Purpose**: Detailed implementation planning with conflict detection
+**Execution**: Full Phase 1-3 (complete discovery + analysis)
+**Output**:
+- Comprehensive context-package with:
+  - Detailed dependency graphs
+  - Deep code structure analysis
+  - Conflict detection with mitigation strategies
+  - Web research for unfamiliar tech
+- Include: All discovery tracks, relevance scoring, 3-source synthesis
+
+## Quality Validation
+
+Before completion verify:
+- [ ] context-package.json in `.workflow/{session}/.process/`
+- [ ] Valid JSON with all required fields
+- [ ] Metadata complete (description, keywords, complexity)
+- [ ] Project context documented (patterns, conventions, tech stack)
+- [ ] Assets organized by type with metadata
+- [ ] Dependencies mapped (internal + external)
+- [ ] Conflict detection with risk level and mitigation
+- [ ] File relevance >80%
+- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
+
+## Performance Limits
+
+**File Counts**:
+- Max 30 high-priority (score >0.8)
+- Max 20 medium-priority (score 0.5-0.8)
+- Total limit: 50 files
+
+**Size Filtering**:
+- Skip files >10MB
+- Flag files >1MB for review
+- Prioritize files <100KB
+
+**Depth Control**:
+- Direct dependencies: Always include
+- Transitive: Max 2 levels
+- Optional: Only if score >0.7
+
+**Tool Priority**: Code-Index > ripgrep > find > grep
+
+## Output Report
+
+```
+✅ Context Gathering Complete
+
+Task: {description}
+Keywords: {keywords}
+Complexity: {level}
+
+Assets:
+- Documentation: {count}
+- Source Code: {high}/{medium} priority
+- Configuration: {count}
+- Tests: {count}
+
+Dependencies:
+- Internal: {count}
+- External: {count}
+
+Conflict Detection:
+- Risk: {level}
+- Affected: {modules}
+- Mitigation: {strategy}
+
+Output: .workflow/{session}/.process/context-package.json
+(Referenced in task JSONs via top-level `context_package_path` field)
+```
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Skip Phase 0 setup
+- Include files without scoring
+- Expose sensitive data (credentials, keys)
+- Exceed file limits (50 total)
+- Include binaries/generated files
+- Use ripgrep if code-index available
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+- Initialize code-index in Phase 0
+- Execute get_modules_by_depth.sh
+- Load CLAUDE.md/README.md (unless in memory)
+- Execute all 3 discovery tracks
+- Use code-index MCP as primary
+- Fallback to ripgrep only when needed
+- Use Exa for unfamiliar APIs
+- Apply multi-factor scoring
+- Build dependency graphs
+- Synthesize all 3 sources
+- Calculate conflict risk
+- Generate valid JSON output
+- Report completion with stats
+
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`
+- **Context Package**: Use project-relative paths (e.g., `src/auth/service.ts`)

.claude/agents/doc-generator.md

@@ -16,16 +16,176 @@ description: |
 color: green
 ---
 
-You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate high-quality documentation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
+You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate or execute documentation generation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+The agent supports **two execution modes** based on task JSON's `meta.cli_execute` field:
+
+1. **Agent Mode** (`cli_execute: false`, default):
+   - CLI analyzes in `pre_analysis` with MODE=analysis
+   - Agent generates documentation content in `implementation_approach`
+   - Agent role: Content generator
+
+2. **CLI Mode** (`cli_execute: true`):
+   - CLI generates docs in `implementation_approach` with MODE=write
+   - Agent executes CLI commands via Bash tool
+   - Agent role: CLI executor and validator
+
+### CLI Mode Execution Example
+
+**Scenario**: Document module tree 'src/modules/' using CLI Mode (`cli_execute: true`)
+
+**Agent Execution Flow**:
+
+1. **Mode Detection**:
+   ```
+   Agent reads meta.cli_execute = true → CLI Mode activated
+   ```
+
+2. **Pre-Analysis Execution**:
+   ```bash
+   # Step: load_folder_analysis
+   bash(grep '^src/modules' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt)
+   # Output stored in [target_folders]:
+   # ./src/modules/auth|code|code:5|dirs:2
+   # ./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
+   ```
+
+3. **Implementation Approach**:
+
+   **Step 1** (Agent parses data):
+   - Agent parses [target_folders] to extract folder types
+   - Identifies: auth (code), api (code)
+   - Stores result in [folder_types]
+
+   **Step 2** (CLI execution):
+   - Agent substitutes [target_folders] into command
+   - Agent executes CLI command via Bash tool:
+   ```bash
+   bash(cd src/modules && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p "
+   PURPOSE: Generate module documentation
+   TASK: Create API.md and README.md for each module
+   MODE: write
+   CONTEXT: @**/* ./src/modules/auth|code|code:5|dirs:2
+   ./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
+   EXPECTED: Documentation files in .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/
+   RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt) | Mirror source structure
+   ")
+   ```
+
+4. **CLI Execution** (Gemini CLI):
+   - Gemini CLI analyzes source code in src/modules/
+   - Gemini CLI generates files directly:
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/auth/API.md`
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/auth/README.md`
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/api/API.md`
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/api/README.md`
+
+5. **Agent Validation**:
+   ```bash
+   # Verify all target files exist
+   bash(find .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules -name "*.md" | wc -l)
+   # Expected: 4 files
+
+   # Check file content is not empty
+   bash(find .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules -name "*.md" -exec wc -l {} \;)
+   ```
+
+6. **Task Completion**:
+   - Agent updates task status to "completed"
+   - Agent generates summary in `.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
+   - Agent updates TODO_LIST.md
+
+**Key Differences from Agent Mode**:
+- **CLI Mode**: CLI writes files directly, agent only executes and validates
+- **Agent Mode**: Agent parses analysis and writes files using Write tool
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
 - **Autonomous Execution**: You are not a script runner; you are a goal-oriented worker that understands and executes a plan.
+- **Mode-Aware**: You adapt execution strategy based on `meta.cli_execute` mode (Agent Mode vs CLI Mode).
 - **Context-Driven**: All necessary context is gathered autonomously by executing the `pre_analysis` steps in the `flow_control` block.
 - **Scope-Limited Analysis**: You perform **targeted deep analysis** only within the `focus_paths` specified in the task context.
-- **Template-Based**: You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
+- **Template-Based** (Agent Mode): You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
+- **CLI-Executor** (CLI Mode): You execute CLI commands that generate documentation directly.
 - **Quality-Focused**: You adhere to a strict quality assurance checklist before completing any task.
 
+## Documentation Quality Principles
+
+### 1. Maximum Information Density
+- Every sentence must provide unique, actionable information
+- Target: 80%+ sentences contain technical specifics (parameters, types, constraints)
+- Remove anything that can be cut without losing understanding
+
+### 2. Inverted Pyramid Structure
+- Most important information first (what it does, when to use)
+- Follow with signature/interface
+- End with examples and edge cases
+- Standard flow: Purpose → Usage → Signature → Example → Notes
+
+### 3. Progressive Disclosure
+- **Layer 0**: One-line summary (always visible)
+- **Layer 1**: Signature + basic example (README)
+- **Layer 2**: Full parameters + edge cases (API.md)
+- **Layer 3**: Implementation + architecture (ARCHITECTURE.md)
+- Use cross-references instead of duplicating content
+
+### 4. Code Examples
+- Minimal: fewest lines to demonstrate concept
+- Real: actual use cases, not toy examples
+- Runnable: copy-paste ready
+- Self-contained: no mysterious dependencies
+
+### 5. Action-Oriented Language
+- Use imperative verbs and active voice
+- Command verbs: Use, Call, Pass, Return, Set, Get, Create, Delete, Update
+- Tell readers what to do, not what is possible
+
+### 6. Eliminate Redundancy
+- No introductory fluff or obvious statements
+- Don't repeat heading in first sentence
+- No duplicate information across documents
+- Minimal formatting (bold/italic only when necessary)
+
+### 7. Document-Specific Guidelines
+
+**API.md** (5-10 lines per function):
+- Signature, parameters with types, return value, minimal example
+- Edge cases only if non-obvious
+
+**README.md** (30-100 lines):
+- Purpose (1-2 sentences), when to use, quick start, link to API.md
+- No architecture details (link to ARCHITECTURE.md)
+
+**ARCHITECTURE.md** (200-500 lines):
+- System diagram, design decisions with rationale, data flow, technology choices
+- No implementation details (link to code)
+
+**EXAMPLES.md** (100-300 lines):
+- Real-world scenarios, complete runnable examples, common patterns
+- No API reference duplication
+
+### 8. Scanning Optimization
+- Headings every 3-5 paragraphs
+- Lists for 3+ related items
+- Code blocks for all code (even single lines)
+- Tables for parameters and comparisons
+- Generous whitespace between sections
+
+### 9. Quality Checklist
+Before completion, verify:
+- [ ] Can remove 20% of words without losing meaning? (If yes, do it)
+- [ ] 80%+ sentences are technically specific?
+- [ ] First paragraph answers "what" and "when"?
+- [ ] Reader can find any info in <10 seconds?
+- [ ] Most important info in first screen?
+- [ ] Examples runnable without modification?
+- [ ] No duplicate information across files?
+- [ ] No empty or obvious statements?
+- [ ] Headings alone convey the flow?
+- [ ] All code blocks syntactically highlighted?
+
 ## Optimized Execution Model
 
 **Key Principle**: Lightweight metadata loading + targeted content analysis
@@ -39,6 +199,9 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 ### 1. Task Ingestion
 - **Input**: A single task JSON file path.
 - **Action**: Load and parse the task JSON. Validate the presence of `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, and `flow_control`.
+- **Mode Detection**: Check `meta.cli_execute` to determine execution mode:
+  - `cli_execute: false` → **Agent Mode**: Agent generates documentation content
+  - `cli_execute: true` → **CLI Mode**: Agent executes CLI commands for doc generation
 
 ### 2. Pre-Analysis Execution (Context Gathering)
 - **Action**: Autonomously execute the `pre_analysis` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially.
@@ -53,8 +216,7 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 {
   "step": "analyze_module_structure",
   "action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
-  "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}
-         System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+  "command": "bash(cd src/auth && gemini \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @**/* System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
   "output_to": "module_analysis",
   "on_error": "fail"
 }
@@ -68,6 +230,7 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 
 ### 3. Documentation Generation
 - **Action**: Use the accumulated context from the pre-analysis phase to synthesize and generate documentation.
+- **Mode Detection**: Check `meta.cli_execute` field to determine execution mode.
 - **Instructions**: Process the `implementation_approach` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially:
   1. **Array Structure**: `implementation_approach` is an array of step objects
   2. **Sequential Execution**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
@@ -77,9 +240,16 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
      - Follow `modification_points` and `logic_flow` for each step
      - Execute `command` if present, otherwise use agent capabilities
      - Store result in `output` variable for future steps
-  5. **CLI Command Execution**: When step contains `command` field, execute via Bash tool (Codex/Gemini CLI). For Codex with dependencies, use `resume --last` flag.
-- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or step-level templates.
-- **Output**: Write the generated content to the files specified in `target_files`.
+  5. **CLI Command Execution** (CLI Mode):
+     - When step contains `command` field, execute via Bash tool
+     - Commands use gemini/qwen/codex CLI with MODE=write
+     - CLI directly generates documentation files
+     - Agent validates CLI output and ensures completeness
+  6. **Agent Generation** (Agent Mode):
+     - When no `command` field, agent generates documentation content
+     - Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or step-level templates
+     - Agent writes files to paths specified in `target_files`
+- **Output**: Ensure all files specified in `target_files` are created or updated.
 
 ### 4. Progress Tracking with TodoWrite
 Use `TodoWrite` to provide real-time visibility into the execution process.
@@ -141,9 +311,13 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
 ## Key Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS**:
+- **Detect Mode**: Check `meta.cli_execute` to determine execution mode (Agent or CLI).
 - **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
 - **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
 - **Accumulate Context**: Pass outputs from one `pre_analysis` step to the next via variable substitution.
+- **Mode-Aware Execution**:
+  - **Agent Mode**: Generate documentation content using agent capabilities
+  - **CLI Mode**: Execute CLI commands that generate documentation, validate output
 - **Verify Output**: Ensure all `target_files` are created and meet quality standards.
 - **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
 - **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
@@ -152,4 +326,5 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
 - **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
 - **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.
 - **Generate Code**: Your role is to document, not to implement.
-- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.
+- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.
+- **Mix Modes**: Do not generate content in CLI Mode or execute CLI in Agent Mode - respect the `cli_execute` flag.

.claude/agents/memory-bridge.md

@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ You will receive:
 ```
 - Total modules: [count]
 - Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex]
-- Mode: [full|related]
 - Module list (depth|path|files|types|has_claude format)
 ```
 
@@ -42,9 +41,13 @@ TodoWrite([
 # 2. Extract module paths for current depth
 # 3. Launch parallel jobs (max 4)
 
-# Depth 5 example:
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "full" "gemini" &
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "full" "gemini" &
+# Depth 5 example (Layer 3 - use multi-layer):
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "gemini" &
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "gemini" &
+
+# Depth 1 example (Layer 2 - use single-layer):
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/auth" "gemini" &
+~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/api" "gemini" &
 # ... up to 4 concurrent jobs
 
 # 4. Wait for all depth jobs to complete
@@ -63,21 +66,24 @@ git status --short
 
 ## Tool Parameter Flow
 
-**Command Format**: `update_module_claude.sh <path> <mode> <tool>`
+**Command Format**: `update_module_claude.sh <strategy> <path> <tool>`
 
 Examples:
-- Gemini: `update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/agents" "full" "gemini" &`
-- Qwen: `update_module_claude.sh "./src/api" "full" "qwen" &`
-- Codex: `update_module_claude.sh "./tests" "full" "codex" &`
+- Layer 3 (depth ≥3): `update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/agents" "gemini" &`
+- Layer 2 (depth 1-2): `update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/api" "qwen" &`
+- Layer 1 (depth 0): `update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./tests" "codex" &`
 
 ## Execution Rules
 
 1. **Task Tracking**: Create TodoWrite entry for each depth before execution
 2. **Parallelism**: Max 4 jobs per depth, sequential across depths
-3. **Tool Passing**: Always pass tool parameter as 3rd argument
-4. **Path Accuracy**: Extract exact path from `depth:N|path:X|...` format
-5. **Completion**: Mark todo completed only after all depth jobs finish
-6. **No Skipping**: Process every module from input list
+3. **Strategy Assignment**: Assign strategy based on depth:
+   - Depth ≥3 (Layer 3): Use "multi-layer" strategy
+   - Depth 0-2 (Layers 1-2): Use "single-layer" strategy
+4. **Tool Passing**: Always pass tool parameter as 3rd argument
+5. **Path Accuracy**: Extract exact path from `depth:N|path:X|...` format
+6. **Completion**: Mark todo completed only after all depth jobs finish
+7. **No Skipping**: Process every module from input list
 
 ## Concise Output
 

.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,419 @@
+---
+name: test-context-search-agent
+description: |
+  Specialized context collector for test generation workflows. Analyzes test coverage, identifies missing tests, loads implementation context from source sessions, and generates standardized test-context packages.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Test session with source session reference
+    user: "Gather test context for WFS-test-auth session"
+    assistant: "I'll load source implementation, analyze test coverage, and generate test-context package"
+    commentary: Execute autonomous coverage analysis with source context loading
+
+  - Context: Multi-framework detection needed
+    user: "Collect test context for full-stack project"
+    assistant: "I'll detect Jest frontend and pytest backend frameworks, analyze coverage gaps"
+    commentary: Identify framework patterns and conventions for each stack
+color: blue
+---
+
+You are a test context discovery specialist focused on gathering test coverage information and implementation context for test generation workflows. Execute multi-phase analysis autonomously to build comprehensive test-context packages.
+
+## Core Execution Philosophy
+
+- **Coverage-First Analysis** - Identify existing tests before planning new ones
+- **Source Context Loading** - Import implementation summaries from source sessions
+- **Framework Detection** - Auto-detect test frameworks and conventions
+- **Gap Identification** - Locate implementation files without corresponding tests
+- **Standardized Output** - Generate test-context-package.json
+
+## Tool Arsenal
+
+### 1. Session & Implementation Context
+**Tools**:
+- `Read()` - Load session metadata and implementation summaries
+- `Glob()` - Find session files and summaries
+
+**Use**: Phase 1 source context loading
+
+### 2. Test Coverage Discovery
+**Primary (Code-Index MCP)**:
+- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - Find test files (*.test.*, *.spec.*)
+- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Search test patterns
+- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary()` - Analyze test structure
+
+**Fallback (CLI)**:
+- `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast test pattern search
+- `find` - Test file discovery
+- `Grep` - Framework detection
+
+**Priority**: Code-Index MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
+
+### 3. Framework & Convention Analysis
+**Tools**:
+- `Read()` - Load package.json, requirements.txt, etc.
+- `rg` - Search for framework patterns
+- `Grep` - Fallback pattern matching
+
+## Simplified Execution Process (3 Phases)
+
+### Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Context Loading
+
+**1.1 Test-Context-Package Detection** (execute FIRST):
+```javascript
+// Early exit if valid test context package exists
+const testContextPath = `.workflow/${test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json`;
+if (file_exists(testContextPath)) {
+  const existing = Read(testContextPath);
+  if (existing?.metadata?.test_session_id === test_session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid test-context-package found, returning existing");
+    return existing; // Immediate return, skip all processing
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**1.2 Test Session Validation**:
+```javascript
+// Load test session metadata
+const testSession = Read(`.workflow/${test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`);
+
+// Validate session type
+if (testSession.meta.session_type !== "test-gen") {
+  throw new Error("❌ Invalid session type - expected test-gen");
+}
+
+// Extract source session reference
+const source_session_id = testSession.meta.source_session;
+if (!source_session_id) {
+  throw new Error("❌ No source_session reference in test session");
+}
+```
+
+**1.3 Source Session Context Loading**:
+```javascript
+// 1. Load source session metadata
+const sourceSession = Read(`.workflow/${source_session_id}/workflow-session.json`);
+
+// 2. Discover implementation summaries
+const summaries = Glob(`.workflow/${source_session_id}/.summaries/*-summary.md`);
+
+// 3. Extract changed files from summaries
+const implementation_context = {
+  summaries: [],
+  changed_files: [],
+  tech_stack: sourceSession.meta.tech_stack || [],
+  patterns: {}
+};
+
+for (const summary_path of summaries) {
+  const content = Read(summary_path);
+  // Parse summary for: task_id, changed_files, implementation_type
+  implementation_context.summaries.push({
+    task_id: extract_task_id(summary_path),
+    summary_path: summary_path,
+    changed_files: extract_changed_files(content),
+    implementation_type: extract_type(content)
+  });
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis
+
+**2.1 Existing Test Discovery**:
+```javascript
+// Method 1: Code-Index MCP (preferred)
+const test_files = mcp__code-index__find_files({
+  patterns: ["*.test.*", "*.spec.*", "*test_*.py", "*_test.go"]
+});
+
+// Method 2: Fallback CLI
+// bash: find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | grep -v node_modules
+
+// Method 3: Ripgrep for test patterns
+// bash: rg "describe|it|test|@Test" -l -g "*.test.*" -g "*.spec.*"
+```
+
+**2.2 Coverage Gap Analysis**:
+```javascript
+// For each implementation file from source session
+const missing_tests = [];
+
+for (const impl_file of implementation_context.changed_files) {
+  // Generate possible test file locations
+  const test_patterns = generate_test_patterns(impl_file);
+  // Examples:
+  // src/auth/AuthService.ts → tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts
+  //                         → src/auth/__tests__/AuthService.test.ts
+  //                         → src/auth/AuthService.spec.ts
+
+  // Check if any test file exists
+  const existing_test = test_patterns.find(pattern => file_exists(pattern));
+
+  if (!existing_test) {
+    missing_tests.push({
+      implementation_file: impl_file,
+      suggested_test_file: test_patterns[0], // Primary pattern
+      priority: determine_priority(impl_file),
+      reason: "New implementation without tests"
+    });
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**2.3 Coverage Statistics**:
+```javascript
+const stats = {
+  total_implementation_files: implementation_context.changed_files.length,
+  total_test_files: test_files.length,
+  files_with_tests: implementation_context.changed_files.length - missing_tests.length,
+  files_without_tests: missing_tests.length,
+  coverage_percentage: calculate_percentage()
+};
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Framework Detection & Packaging
+
+**3.1 Test Framework Identification**:
+```javascript
+// 1. Check package.json / requirements.txt / Gemfile
+const framework_config = detect_framework_from_config();
+
+// 2. Analyze existing test patterns (if tests exist)
+if (test_files.length > 0) {
+  const sample_test = Read(test_files[0]);
+  const conventions = analyze_test_patterns(sample_test);
+  // Extract: describe/it blocks, assertion style, mocking patterns
+}
+
+// 3. Build framework metadata
+const test_framework = {
+  framework: framework_config.name,        // jest, mocha, pytest, etc.
+  version: framework_config.version,
+  test_pattern: determine_test_pattern(),  // **/*.test.ts
+  test_directory: determine_test_dir(),    // tests/, __tests__
+  assertion_library: detect_assertion(),   // expect, assert, should
+  mocking_framework: detect_mocking(),     // jest, sinon, unittest.mock
+  conventions: {
+    file_naming: conventions.file_naming,
+    test_structure: conventions.structure,
+    setup_teardown: conventions.lifecycle
+  }
+};
+```
+
+**3.2 Generate test-context-package.json**:
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "test_session_id": "WFS-test-auth",
+    "source_session_id": "WFS-auth",
+    "timestamp": "ISO-8601",
+    "task_type": "test-generation",
+    "complexity": "medium"
+  },
+  "source_context": {
+    "implementation_summaries": [
+      {
+        "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+        "summary_path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+        "changed_files": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts"],
+        "implementation_type": "feature"
+      }
+    ],
+    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "express"],
+    "project_patterns": {
+      "architecture": "layered",
+      "error_handling": "try-catch",
+      "async_pattern": "async/await"
+    }
+  },
+  "test_coverage": {
+    "existing_tests": ["tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts"],
+    "missing_tests": [
+      {
+        "implementation_file": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+        "suggested_test_file": "tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "reason": "New implementation without tests"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_stats": {
+      "total_implementation_files": 3,
+      "files_with_tests": 2,
+      "files_without_tests": 1,
+      "coverage_percentage": 66.7
+    }
+  },
+  "test_framework": {
+    "framework": "jest",
+    "version": "^29.0.0",
+    "test_pattern": "**/*.test.ts",
+    "test_directory": "tests/",
+    "assertion_library": "expect",
+    "mocking_framework": "jest",
+    "conventions": {
+      "file_naming": "*.test.ts",
+      "test_structure": "describe/it blocks",
+      "setup_teardown": "beforeEach/afterEach"
+    }
+  },
+  "assets": [
+    {
+      "type": "implementation_summary",
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+      "relevance": "Source implementation context",
+      "priority": "highest"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "existing_test",
+      "path": "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
+      "relevance": "Test pattern reference",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "source_code",
+      "path": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+      "relevance": "Implementation requiring tests",
+      "priority": "high"
+    }
+  ],
+  "focus_areas": [
+    "Generate comprehensive tests for TokenValidator",
+    "Follow existing Jest patterns from AuthService tests",
+    "Cover happy path, error cases, and edge cases"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**3.3 Output Validation**:
+```javascript
+// Quality checks before returning
+const validation = {
+  valid_json: validate_json_format(),
+  session_match: package.metadata.test_session_id === test_session_id,
+  has_source_context: package.source_context.implementation_summaries.length > 0,
+  framework_detected: package.test_framework.framework !== "unknown",
+  coverage_analyzed: package.test_coverage.coverage_stats !== null
+};
+
+if (!validation.all_passed()) {
+  console.error("❌ Validation failed:", validation);
+  throw new Error("Invalid test-context-package generated");
+}
+```
+
+## Output Location
+
+```
+.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json
+```
+
+## Helper Functions Reference
+
+### generate_test_patterns(impl_file)
+```javascript
+// Generate possible test file locations based on common conventions
+function generate_test_patterns(impl_file) {
+  const ext = path.extname(impl_file);
+  const base = path.basename(impl_file, ext);
+  const dir = path.dirname(impl_file);
+
+  return [
+    // Pattern 1: tests/ mirror structure
+    dir.replace('src', 'tests') + '/' + base + '.test' + ext,
+    // Pattern 2: __tests__ sibling
+    dir + '/__tests__/' + base + '.test' + ext,
+    // Pattern 3: .spec variant
+    dir.replace('src', 'tests') + '/' + base + '.spec' + ext,
+    // Pattern 4: Python test_ prefix
+    dir.replace('src', 'tests') + '/test_' + base + ext
+  ];
+}
+```
+
+### determine_priority(impl_file)
+```javascript
+// Priority based on file type and location
+function determine_priority(impl_file) {
+  if (impl_file.includes('/core/') || impl_file.includes('/auth/')) return 'high';
+  if (impl_file.includes('/utils/') || impl_file.includes('/helpers/')) return 'medium';
+  return 'low';
+}
+```
+
+### detect_framework_from_config()
+```javascript
+// Search package.json, requirements.txt, etc.
+function detect_framework_from_config() {
+  const configs = [
+    { file: 'package.json', patterns: ['jest', 'mocha', 'jasmine', 'vitest'] },
+    { file: 'requirements.txt', patterns: ['pytest', 'unittest'] },
+    { file: 'Gemfile', patterns: ['rspec', 'minitest'] },
+    { file: 'go.mod', patterns: ['testify'] }
+  ];
+
+  for (const config of configs) {
+    if (file_exists(config.file)) {
+      const content = Read(config.file);
+      for (const pattern of config.patterns) {
+        if (content.includes(pattern)) {
+          return extract_framework_info(content, pattern);
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  return { name: 'unknown', version: null };
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Source session not found | Invalid source_session reference | Verify test session metadata |
+| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Complete source session first |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to specify framework |
+| Coverage analysis failed | File access issues | Check file permissions |
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Plan Mode (Default)
+- Full Phase 1-3 execution
+- Comprehensive coverage analysis
+- Complete framework detection
+- Generate full test-context-package.json
+
+### Quick Mode (Future)
+- Skip framework detection if already known
+- Analyze only new implementation files
+- Partial context package update
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Source session context loaded successfully
+- ✅ Test coverage gaps identified
+- ✅ Test framework detected and documented
+- ✅ Valid test-context-package.json generated
+- ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
+- ✅ Execution time < 30 seconds (< 60s for large codebases)
+
+## Integration Points
+
+### Called By
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Orchestrator command
+
+### Calls
+- Code-Index MCP tools (preferred)
+- ripgrep/find (fallback)
+- Bash file operations
+
+### Followed By
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis
+
+## Notes
+
+- **Detection-first**: Always check for existing test-context-package before analysis
+- **Code-Index priority**: Use MCP tools when available, fallback to CLI
+- **Framework agnostic**: Supports Jest, Mocha, pytest, RSpec, etc.
+- **Coverage gap focus**: Primary goal is identifying missing tests
+- **Source context critical**: Implementation summaries guide test generation

.claude/agents/test-fix-agent.md

@@ -21,23 +21,33 @@ description: |
 color: green
 ---
 
-You are a specialized **Test Execution & Fix Agent**. Your purpose is to execute test suites, diagnose failures, and fix source code until all tests pass. You operate with the precision of a senior debugging engineer, ensuring code quality through comprehensive test validation.
+You are a specialized **Test Execution & Fix Agent**. Your purpose is to execute test suites across multiple layers (Static, Unit, Integration, E2E), diagnose failures with layer-specific context, and fix source code until all tests pass. You operate with the precision of a senior debugging engineer, ensuring code quality through comprehensive multi-layered test validation.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
-**"Tests Are the Review"** - When all tests pass, the code is approved and ready. No separate review process is needed.
+**"Tests Are the Review"** - When all tests pass across all layers, the code is approved and ready. No separate review process is needed.
+
+**"Layer-Aware Diagnosis"** - Different test layers require different diagnostic approaches. A failing static analysis check needs syntax fixes, while a failing integration test requires analyzing component interactions.
 
 ## Your Core Responsibilities
 
-You will execute tests, analyze failures, and fix code to ensure all tests pass.
+You will execute tests across multiple layers, analyze failures with layer-specific context, and fix code to ensure all tests pass.
 
-### Test Execution & Fixing Responsibilities:
-1. **Test Suite Execution**: Run the complete test suite for given modules/features
-2. **Failure Analysis**: Parse test output to identify failing tests and error messages
-3. **Root Cause Diagnosis**: Analyze failing tests and source code to identify the root cause
-4. **Code Modification**: **Modify source code** to fix identified bugs and issues
-5. **Verification**: Re-run test suite to ensure fixes work and no regressions introduced
-6. **Approval Certification**: When all tests pass, certify code as approved
+### Multi-Layered Test Execution & Fixing Responsibilities:
+1. **Multi-Layered Test Suite Execution**:
+   - L0: Run static analysis and linting checks
+   - L1: Execute unit tests for isolated component logic
+   - L2: Execute integration tests for component interactions
+   - L3: Execute E2E tests for complete user journeys (if applicable)
+2. **Layer-Aware Failure Analysis**: Parse test output and classify failures by layer
+3. **Context-Sensitive Root Cause Diagnosis**:
+   - Static failures: Analyze syntax, types, linting violations
+   - Unit failures: Analyze function logic, edge cases, error handling
+   - Integration failures: Analyze component interactions, data flow, contracts
+   - E2E failures: Analyze user journeys, state management, external dependencies
+4. **Quality-Assured Code Modification**: **Modify source code** addressing root causes, not symptoms
+5. **Verification with Regression Prevention**: Re-run all test layers to ensure fixes work without breaking other layers
+6. **Approval Certification**: When all tests pass across all layers, certify code as approved
 
 ## Execution Process
 
@@ -68,21 +78,67 @@ When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
 ### 1. Context Assessment & Test Discovery
 - Analyze task context to identify test files and source code paths
 - Load test framework configuration (Jest, Pytest, Mocha, etc.)
-- Identify test command from project configuration
+- **Identify test layers** by analyzing test file paths and naming patterns:
+  - L0 (Static): Linting configs (`.eslintrc`, `tsconfig.json`), static analysis tools
+  - L1 (Unit): `*.test.*`, `*.spec.*` in `__tests__/`, `tests/unit/`
+  - L2 (Integration): `tests/integration/`, `*.integration.test.*`
+  - L3 (E2E): `tests/e2e/`, `*.e2e.test.*`, `cypress/`, `playwright/`
+- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Extract artifact paths using `jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path'`
+- Identify test commands from project configuration
 
 ```bash
-# Detect test framework and command
+# Detect test framework and multi-layered commands
 if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
-    TEST_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts.test')
+    # Extract layer-specific test commands
+    LINT_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts.lint // "eslint ."')
+    UNIT_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:unit"] // .scripts.test')
+    INTEGRATION_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:integration"] // ""')
+    E2E_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:e2e"] // ""')
 elif [ -f "pytest.ini" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
-    TEST_CMD="pytest"
+    LINT_CMD="ruff check . || flake8 ."
+    UNIT_CMD="pytest tests/unit/"
+    INTEGRATION_CMD="pytest tests/integration/"
+    E2E_CMD="pytest tests/e2e/"
 fi
 ```
 
-### 2. Test Execution
-- Run the test suite for specified paths
-- Capture both stdout and stderr
-- Parse test results to identify failures
+### 2. Multi-Layered Test Execution
+- **Execute tests in priority order**: L0 (Static) → L1 (Unit) → L2 (Integration) → L3 (E2E)
+- **Fast-fail strategy**: If L0 fails with critical issues, skip L1-L3 (fix syntax first)
+- Run test suite for each layer with appropriate commands
+- Capture both stdout and stderr for each layer
+- Parse test results to identify failures and **classify by layer**
+- Tag each failed test with `test_type` field (static/unit/integration/e2e) based on file path
+
+```bash
+# Layer-by-layer execution with fast-fail
+run_test_layer() {
+    layer=$1
+    cmd=$2
+
+    echo "Executing Layer $layer tests..."
+    $cmd 2>&1 | tee ".process/test-layer-$layer-output.txt"
+
+    # Parse results and tag with test_type
+    parse_test_results ".process/test-layer-$layer-output.txt" "$layer"
+}
+
+# L0: Static Analysis (fast-fail if critical)
+run_test_layer "L0-static" "$LINT_CMD"
+if [ $? -ne 0 ] && has_critical_syntax_errors; then
+    echo "Critical static analysis errors - skipping runtime tests"
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# L1: Unit Tests
+run_test_layer "L1-unit" "$UNIT_CMD"
+
+# L2: Integration Tests (if exists)
+[ -n "$INTEGRATION_CMD" ] && run_test_layer "L2-integration" "$INTEGRATION_CMD"
+
+# L3: E2E Tests (if exists)
+[ -n "$E2E_CMD" ] && run_test_layer "L3-e2e" "$E2E_CMD"
+```
 
 ### 3. Failure Diagnosis & Fixing Loop
 
@@ -155,12 +211,14 @@ When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
 - **Passed**: [count]
 - **Failed**: [count]
 - **Errors**: [count]
+- **Pass Rate**: [percentage]% (Target: 95%+)
 
 ## Issues Found & Fixed
 
 ### Issue 1: [Description]
 - **Test**: `tests/auth/login.test.ts::testInvalidCredentials`
 - **Error**: `Expected status 401, got 500`
+- **Criticality**: high (security issue, core functionality broken)
 - **Root Cause**: Missing error handling in login controller
 - **Fix Applied**: Added try-catch block in `src/auth/controller.ts:45`
 - **Files Modified**: `src/auth/controller.ts`
@@ -168,6 +226,7 @@ When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
 ### Issue 2: [Description]
 - **Test**: `tests/payment/process.test.ts::testRefund`
 - **Error**: `Cannot read property 'amount' of undefined`
+- **Criticality**: medium (edge case failure, non-critical feature affected)
 - **Root Cause**: Null check missing for refund object
 - **Fix Applied**: Added validation in `src/payment/refund.ts:78`
 - **Files Modified**: `src/payment/refund.ts`
@@ -177,6 +236,7 @@ When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
 ✅ **All tests passing**
 - **Total Tests**: [count]
 - **Passed**: [count]
+- **Pass Rate**: 100%
 - **Duration**: [time]
 
 ## Code Approval
@@ -189,6 +249,71 @@ All tests pass - code is ready for deployment.
 - `src/payment/refund.ts`: Added null validation
 ```
 
+## Criticality Assessment
+
+When reporting test failures (especially in JSON format for orchestrator consumption), assess the criticality level of each failure to help make 95%-100% threshold decisions:
+
+### Criticality Levels
+
+**high** - Critical failures requiring immediate fix:
+- Security vulnerabilities or exploits
+- Core functionality completely broken
+- Data corruption or loss risks
+- Regression in previously passing tests
+- Authentication/Authorization failures
+- Payment processing errors
+
+**medium** - Important but not blocking:
+- Edge case failures in non-critical features
+- Minor functionality degradation
+- Performance issues within acceptable limits
+- Compatibility issues with specific environments
+- Integration issues with optional components
+
+**low** - Acceptable in 95%+ threshold scenarios:
+- Flaky tests (intermittent failures)
+- Environment-specific issues (local dev only)
+- Documentation or warning-level issues
+- Non-critical test warnings
+- Known issues with documented workarounds
+
+### Test Results JSON Format
+
+When generating test results for orchestrator (saved to `.process/test-results.json`):
+
+```json
+{
+  "total": 10,
+  "passed": 9,
+  "failed": 1,
+  "pass_rate": 90.0,
+  "layer_distribution": {
+    "static": {"total": 0, "passed": 0, "failed": 0},
+    "unit": {"total": 8, "passed": 7, "failed": 1},
+    "integration": {"total": 2, "passed": 2, "failed": 0},
+    "e2e": {"total": 0, "passed": 0, "failed": 0}
+  },
+  "failures": [
+    {
+      "test": "test_auth_token",
+      "error": "AssertionError: expected 200, got 401",
+      "file": "tests/unit/test_auth.py",
+      "line": 45,
+      "criticality": "high",
+      "test_type": "unit"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### Decision Support
+
+**For orchestrator decision-making**:
+- Pass rate 100% + all tests pass → ✅ SUCCESS (proceed to completion)
+- Pass rate >= 95% + all failures are "low" criticality → ✅ PARTIAL SUCCESS (review and approve)
+- Pass rate >= 95% + any "high" or "medium" criticality failures → ⚠️ NEEDS FIX (continue iteration)
+- Pass rate < 95% → ❌ FAILED (continue iteration or abort)
+
 ## Important Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS:**
@@ -212,3 +337,5 @@ All tests pass - code is ready for deployment.
 **Your ultimate responsibility**: Ensure all tests pass. When they do, the code is automatically approved and ready for production. You are the final quality gate.
 
 **Tests passing = Code approved = Mission complete** ✅
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`

.claude/agents/universal-executor.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: general-purpose
+name: universal-executor
 description: |
   Versatile execution agent for implementing any task efficiently. Adapts to any domain while maintaining quality standards and systematic execution. Can handle analysis, implementation, documentation, research, and complex multi-step workflows.
 

.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md

@@ -1,111 +1,87 @@
 ---
 name: analyze
-description: Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen)
+description: Read-only codebase analysis using Gemini (default), Qwen, or Codex with auto-pattern detection and template selection
 argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Analyze Command (/cli:analyze)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
+Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Read-only - does NOT modify code**.
 
-**Intent**: Understand code patterns, architecture, and provide insights/recommendations
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-
-## Core Behavior
-
-1. **Read-Only Analysis**: This command ONLY analyzes code and provides insights
-2. **No Code Modification**: Results are recommendations and analysis reports
-3. **Template-Based**: Automatically selects appropriate analysis template
-4. **Smart Pattern Detection**: Infers relevant files based on analysis target
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **gemini** (default) - Best for code analysis
+- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
+- **codex** - Alternative for deep analysis
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
 - `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
 - `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
 
+## Tool Usage
+
+**Gemini** (Primary):
+```bash
+--tool gemini  # or omit (default)
+```
+
+**Qwen** (Fallback):
+```bash
+--tool qwen
+```
+
+**Codex** (Alternative):
+```bash
+--tool codex
+```
+
 ## Execution Flow
 
-1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` first to expand user intent
-3. Auto-detect analysis type from keywords → select template
-4. Build command with auto-detected file patterns and `MODE: analysis`
-5. Execute analysis (read-only, no code changes)
-6. Return analysis report with insights and recommendations
+Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated analysis:
 
-## File Pattern Auto-Detection
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Codebase analysis with pattern detection",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${analysis_target}
+    Mode: analyze
+    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
+    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
 
-Keywords trigger specific file patterns:
-- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- "component" → `@{src/components/**/*,**/*.component.*}`
-- "API" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- "test" → `@{**/*.test.*,**/*.spec.*}`
-- "config" → `@{*.config.*,**/config/**/*}`
-- Generic → `@{src/**/*}`
+    Execute codebase analysis with auto-pattern detection:
 
-For complex patterns, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first, then execute CLI with precise file references.
+    1. Context Discovery:
+       - Extract keywords from analysis target
+       - Auto-detect file patterns (auth→auth files, component→components, etc.)
+       - Discover additional relevant files using MCP
+       - Build comprehensive file context
 
-## Command Template
+    2. Template Selection:
+       - Auto-select analysis template based on keywords
+       - Apply appropriate analysis methodology
+       - Include @CLAUDE.md for project context
 
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
-TASK: [auto-detected analysis type]
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected file patterns]
-EXPECTED: Insights, patterns, recommendations (NO code modification)
-RULES: [auto-selected template] | Focus on [analysis aspect]
-"
+    3. CLI Command Construction:
+       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for deep analysis)
+       - Context: @CLAUDE.md + auto-detected patterns + discovered files
+       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
+       - Expected: Insights, recommendations, pattern analysis
+
+    4. Execution & Output:
+       - Execute CLI tool with assembled context
+       - Generate comprehensive analysis report
+       - Save to .workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
+  `
+)
 ```
 
-## Examples
+## Core Rules
 
-**Basic Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
-# Executes: Gemini analysis with auth file patterns
-# Returns: Pattern analysis, architecture insights, recommendations
-```
-
-**Architecture Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"
-# Executes: Qwen with component file patterns
-# Returns: Architecture review, design patterns, improvement suggestions
-```
-
-**Performance Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks"
-# Executes: Codex deep analysis with performance focus
-# Returns: Bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations
-```
-
-**Enhanced Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues"
-# Step 1: Enhance prompt to expand context
-# Step 2: Analysis with expanded context
-# Returns: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR one-off analysis**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/analyze-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-auth-system`, analyzing auth patterns → `.chat/analyze-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, quick security check → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates, file patterns, and best practices: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Scratchpad files can be promoted to workflow sessions if analysis proves valuable
+- **Read-only**: Analyzes code, does NOT modify files
+- **Auto-pattern**: Detects file patterns from keywords (auth→auth files, component→components, API→api/routes, test→test files)
+- **Output**: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/chat.md

@@ -1,116 +1,82 @@
 ---
 name: chat
-description: Simple CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
+description: Read-only Q&A interaction with Gemini/Qwen/Codex for codebase questions with automatic context inference
 argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
+Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Read-only - does NOT modify code**.
 
-**Intent**: Ask questions, get explanations, understand codebase structure
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-
-## Core Behavior
-
-1. **Conversational Analysis**: Direct question-answer interaction about codebase
-2. **Read-Only**: This command ONLY provides information and analysis
-3. **No Code Modification**: Results are explanations and insights
-4. **Flexible Context**: Choose specific files or entire codebase
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **gemini** (default) - Best for Q&A and explanations
+- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
+- **codex** - Alternative for technical deep-dives
 
 ## Parameters
 
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt`
 - `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--all-files` - Include entire codebase in context
-- `--save-session` - Save interaction to workflow session
+
+## Tool Usage
+
+**Gemini** (Primary):
+```bash
+--tool gemini  # or omit (default)
+```
+
+**Qwen** (Fallback):
+```bash
+--tool qwen
+```
+
+**Codex** (Alternative):
+```bash
+--tool codex
+```
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
-1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand user intent
-3. Assemble context: `@{CLAUDE.md}` + user-specified files or `--all-files`
-4. Execute CLI tool with assembled context (read-only, analysis mode)
-5. Return explanations and insights (NO code changes)
-6. Optionally save to workflow session
+Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated Q&A:
 
-## Context Assembly
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Codebase Q&A with intelligent context discovery",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${inquiry}
+    Mode: chat
+    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
+    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
 
-**Always included**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}` (project guidelines)
+    Execute codebase Q&A with intelligent context discovery:
 
-**Optional**:
-- User-explicit files from inquiry keywords
-- `--all-files` flag includes entire codebase (`--all-files` wrapper parameter)
+    1. Context Discovery:
+       - Parse inquiry to identify relevant topics/keywords
+       - Discover related files using MCP/ripgrep (prioritize precision)
+       - Include @CLAUDE.md + discovered files
+       - Validate context relevance to question
 
-For targeted analysis, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files first, then build precise CONTEXT field.
+    2. CLI Command Construction:
+       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for deep dives)
+       - Context: @CLAUDE.md + discovered file patterns
+       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
+       - Expected: Clear, accurate answer with code references
 
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-INQUIRY: [user question]
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [inferred or --all-files]
-MODE: analysis
-RESPONSE: Direct answer, explanation, insights (NO code modification)
-"
+    3. Execution & Output:
+       - Execute CLI tool with assembled context
+       - Validate answer completeness
+       - Save to .workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
+  `
+)
 ```
 
-## Examples
+## Core Rules
 
-**Basic Question**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-# Executes: Gemini analysis
-# Returns: Explanation of auth flow, components involved, data flow
-```
-
-**Architecture Question**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --tool qwen "how does React component optimization work here"
-# Executes: Qwen architecture analysis
-# Returns: Component structure explanation, optimization patterns used
-```
-
-**Security Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
-# Executes: Codex security analysis
-# Returns: Vulnerability assessment, security recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
-```
-
-**Enhanced Inquiry**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --enhance "explain the login issue"
-# Step 1: Enhance to expand login context
-# Step 2: Analysis with expanded understanding
-# Returns: Detailed explanation of login flow and potential issues
-```
-
-**Broad Context**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --all-files "find all API endpoints"
-# Executes: Analysis across entire codebase
-# Returns: List and explanation of API endpoints (NO code generation)
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND query is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR unrelated query**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/chat-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-api-refactor`, asking about API structure → `.chat/chat-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, asking about build process → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Scratchpad conversations preserved for future reference
+- **Read-only**: Provides answers, does NOT modify code
+- **Context**: `@CLAUDE.md` + inferred or all files (`@**/*`)
+- **Output**: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/cli-init.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: cli-init
-description: Initialize CLI tool configurations (Gemini and Qwen) based on workspace analysis
+description: Generate .gemini/ and .qwen/ config directories with settings.json and ignore files based on workspace technology detection
 argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|all] [--output path] [--preview]"
 allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
 ---
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Creates tool-specific configuration directories:
 - `.gemini/settings.json`:
 ```json
 {
-  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+  "contextfilename": ["CLAUDE.md","GEMINI.md"]
 }
 ```
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Creates tool-specific configuration directories:
 - `.qwen/settings.json`:
 ```json
 {
-  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+  "contextfilename": ["CLAUDE.md","QWEN.md"]
 }
 ```
 
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ target/
 /cli:cli-init --tool all --output=.config/
 ```
 
-## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS ⚡ START HERE
+## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS - START HERE
 
 **When this command is triggered, follow these exact steps:**
 
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ bash(find . -name "Dockerfile" | head -1)
 ```bash
 # Create .gemini/ directory and settings.json
 mkdir -p .gemini
-echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .gemini/settings.json
+Write({file_path: '.gemini/settings.json', content: '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}'})
 
 # Create .geminiignore file with detected technology rules
 # Backup existing files if present
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .gemini/settings.json
 ```bash
 # Create .qwen/ directory and settings.json
 mkdir -p .qwen
-echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .qwen/settings.json
+Write({file_path: '.qwen/settings.json', content: '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}'})
 
 # Create .qwenignore file with detected technology rules
 # Backup existing files if present

.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: codex-execute
-description: Automated task decomposition and execution with Codex using resume mechanism
+description: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition into grouped subtasks using resume mechanism for context continuity
 argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 ---
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ git status --short
 codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: [group goal]
 TASK: [subtask description - first in group]
-CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
+CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @CLAUDE.md
 EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
 RULES: [constraints]
 Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ git add -A
 codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: [new group goal]
 TASK: [subtask description - first in new group]
-CONTEXT: @{different_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
+CONTEXT: @{different_files} @CLAUDE.md
 EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
 RULES: [constraints]
 Group [Y]: [new group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
@@ -257,12 +257,12 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 **When to Resume vs New Session**:
 ```
-✅ RESUME (same group):
+RESUME (same group):
   - Subtasks share files/modules
   - Logical continuation of previous work
   - Same architectural domain
 
-❌ NEW SESSION (different group):
+NEW SESSION (different group):
   - Independent task area
   - Different files/modules
   - Switching architectural domains
@@ -284,10 +284,22 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
 1. Mark subtask as blocked in TodoWrite
 2. Report error details to user
 3. Pause execution for manual intervention
-4. User can choose to:
-   - Retry current subtask
-   - Continue to next subtask
-   - Abort entire task
+4. Use AskUserQuestion for recovery decision:
+
+```typescript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Codex execution failed for the subtask. How should the workflow proceed?",
+    header: "Recovery",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Retry Subtask", description: "Attempt to execute the same subtask again." },
+      { label: "Skip Subtask", description: "Continue to the next subtask in the plan." },
+      { label: "Abort Workflow", description: "Stop the entire execution." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
+```
 
 **Git Verification Failure** (if --verify-git):
 1. Show unexpected changes
@@ -306,7 +318,7 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
 
 **During Execution**:
 ```
-📊 Task Flow Diagram:
+Task Flow Diagram:
 [Group A: Auth Core]
   A1: Create user model ──┐
   A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
@@ -319,7 +331,7 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
   C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
   C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
 
-📋 Task Decomposition:
+Task Decomposition:
   [Group A] 1. Create user model
   [Group A] 2. Add validation logic [resume]
   [Group A] 3. Implement database schema [resume]
@@ -329,28 +341,28 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
   [Group C] 7. Unit tests [new session]
   [Group C] 8. Integration tests [resume]
 
-▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
+[Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
   Starting new Codex session for Group A...
   [Codex output]
-  ✅ Subtask 1 completed
+  Subtask 1 completed
 
-🔍 Git Verification:
+Git Verification:
   M  src/models/user.ts
-  ✅ Changes verified
+  Changes verified
 
-▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
+[Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
   Resuming Codex session (same group)...
   [Codex output]
-  ✅ Subtask 2 completed
+  Subtask 2 completed
 
-▶️  [Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
+[Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
   Starting NEW Codex session for Group B...
   [Codex output]
-  ✅ Subtask 4 completed
+  Subtask 4 completed
 ...
 
-✅ All Subtasks Completed
-📊 Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
+All Subtasks Completed
+Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
 ```
 
 **Final Summary**:
@@ -358,8 +370,8 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
 # Task Execution Summary: [Task Description]
 
 ## Subtasks Completed
-1. ✅ [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
-2. ✅ [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
+1. [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
+2. [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
 ...
 
 ## Files Modified
@@ -503,6 +515,5 @@ codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -
 **Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
 
 **Output Details**:
-- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
 - Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
 - **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes

.claude/commands/cli/discuss-plan.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: discuss-plan
-description: Orchestrates an iterative, multi-model discussion for planning and analysis without implementation.
+description: Multi-round collaborative planning using Gemini, Codex, and Claude synthesis with iterative discussion cycles (read-only, no code changes)
 argument-hint: "[--topic '...'] [--task-id '...'] [--rounds N]"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 ---
@@ -69,11 +69,11 @@ Gemini analyzes the topic and proposes preliminary plan.
 ```bash
 # Round 1: CONTEXT_INPUT is the initial topic
 # Subsequent rounds: CONTEXT_INPUT is the synthesis from previous round
-~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+gemini -p "
 PURPOSE: Analyze and propose a plan for '[topic]'
 TASK: Provide initial analysis, identify key modules, and draft implementation plan
 MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
+CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md [auto-detected files]
 INPUT: [CONTEXT_INPUT]
 EXPECTED: Structured analysis and draft plan for discussion
 RULES: Focus on technical depth and practical considerations
@@ -86,18 +86,18 @@ Codex reviews Gemini's output using conversational reasoning. Uses `resume --las
 
 ```bash
 # First round (new session)
-codex chat "
+codex --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: Critically review technical plan
 TASK: Review the provided plan, identify weaknesses, suggest alternatives, reason about trade-offs
 MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [relevant files]
+CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md [relevant files]
 INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis]
 EXPECTED: Critical review with alternative ideas and risk analysis
 RULES: Focus on architectural soundness and implementation feasibility
-"
+" --skip-git-repo-check
 
 # Subsequent rounds (resume discussion)
-codex chat "
+codex --full-auto exec "
 PURPOSE: Re-evaluate plan based on latest synthesis
 TASK: Review updated plan and discussion points, provide further critique or refined ideas
 MODE: analysis
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ CONTEXT: Previous discussion context (maintained via resume)
 INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis for current round]
 EXPECTED: Updated critique building on previous discussion
 RULES: Build on previous insights, avoid repeating points
-" resume --last
+" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check
 ```
 
 **Step 3: Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)**
@@ -121,9 +121,22 @@ Claude (orchestrating AI) synthesizes both outputs:
 ### Phase 3: User Review and Iteration
 
 1.  **Present Synthesis**: Show synthesized plan and key discussion points
-2.  **Continue or Conclude**: Prompt user:
-    - **(1)** Start another round of discussion
-    - **(2)** Conclude and finalize the plan
+2.  **Continue or Conclude**: Use AskUserQuestion to prompt user:
+
+```typescript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Round of discussion complete. What is the next step?",
+    header: "Next Round",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Start another round", description: "Continue the discussion to refine the plan further." },
+      { label: "Conclude and finalize", description: "End the discussion and save the final plan." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
+```
+
 3.  **Loop or Finalize**:
     -   Continue → New round with Gemini analyzing latest synthesis
     -   Conclude → Save final synthesized document
@@ -266,11 +279,11 @@ Each round's output is structured as:
 
 | Command | Models | Rounds | Discussion | Implementation | Use Case |
 |---------|--------|--------|------------|----------------|----------|
-| `/cli:mode:plan` | Gemini | 1 | ❌ NO | ❌ NO | Single-model planning |
-| `/cli:analyze` | Gemini/Qwen | 1 | ❌ NO | ❌ NO | Code analysis |
-| `/cli:execute` | Any | 1 | ❌ NO | ✅ YES | Direct implementation |
-| `/cli:codex-execute` | Codex | 1 | ❌ NO | ✅ YES | Multi-stage implementation |
-| `/cli:discuss-plan` | **Gemini+Codex+Claude** | **Multiple** | ✅ **YES** | ❌ **NO** | **Multi-perspective planning** |
+| `/cli:mode:plan` | Gemini | 1 | NO | NO | Single-model planning |
+| `/cli:analyze` | Gemini/Qwen | 1 | NO | NO | Code analysis |
+| `/cli:execute` | Any | 1 | NO | YES | Direct implementation |
+| `/cli:codex-execute` | Codex | 1 | NO | YES | Multi-stage implementation |
+| `/cli:discuss-plan` | **Gemini+Codex+Claude** | **Multiple** | **YES** | **NO** | **Multi-perspective planning** |
 
 ## Best Practices
 
@@ -304,5 +317,4 @@ Each round's output is structured as:
 -   **Priority System**: Ensures Gemini leads analysis, Codex provides critique, Claude synthesizes
 -   **Output Quality**: Multi-perspective discussion produces more robust plans than single-model analysis
 -   Command patterns and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
--   Output routing details: see workflow-architecture.md
 -   For implementation after discussion, use `/cli:execute` or `/cli:codex-execute` separately

.claude/commands/cli/execute.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: execute
-description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference
+description: Autonomous code implementation with YOLO auto-approval using Gemini/Qwen/Codex, supports task ID or description input with automatic file pattern detection
 argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confir
 ### YOLO Permissions
 Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
 
-**⚠️ WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
+**WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
 
 ### Execution Modes
 
@@ -39,13 +39,17 @@ Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summar
 - Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
 - Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
 
+**3. Agent Mode** (default):
+- Input: Description or task-id
+- Process: 5-Phase Workflow → Context Discovery → Optimal Tool Selection → Execute
+
 ### Context Inference
 
-Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology:
-- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
-- "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- Always includes: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
+Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology (each @ references one pattern):
+- "auth" → `@**/*auth* @**/*user*`
+- "React" → `@src/**/*.jsx @src/**/*.tsx`
+- "api" → `@**/api/**/* @**/routes/**/*`
+- Always includes: `@CLAUDE.md @**/*CLAUDE.md`
 
 For precise file targeting, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first.
 
@@ -64,7 +68,7 @@ Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
+- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: auto-select by agent based on complexity)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
 - `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
 - `--debug` - Verbose logging
@@ -78,62 +82,87 @@ Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See
 
 **Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
 
-## Output Routing
+## Execution Flow
 
-**Execution Log Destination**:
-- **IF** active workflow session exists:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-  - Update task status in `.task/[TASK-ID].json` (if task ID provided)
-  - Generate summary in `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`
-- **ELSE** (no active session):
-  - **Option 1**: Create new workflow session for task
-  - **Option 2**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
+Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated implementation:
 
-**Output Files** (when active session exists):
-- Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- Task summary: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
-- Modified code: Project files per implementation
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Autonomous code implementation with YOLO auto-approval",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${description_or_task_id}
+    Mode: execute
+    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
+    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
+    Task-ID: ${task_id}
 
-**Examples**:
-- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing `IMPL-001`:
-  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/execute-20250105-143022.md`
-  - Summary: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
-- No session, ad-hoc implementation:
-  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143045.md`
+    Execute autonomous code implementation with full modification permissions:
 
-## Command Template
+    1. Task Analysis:
+       ${task_id ? '- Load task spec from .task/' + task_id + '.json' : ''}
+       - Parse requirements and implementation scope
+       - Classify complexity (simple/medium/complex)
+       - Extract keywords for context discovery
 
-```bash
-# Gemini/Qwen: MODE=write with --approval-mode yolo
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
-PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
-TASK: [specific implementation]
-MODE: write
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
-EXPECTED: Working implementation with code changes
-RULES: [constraints] | Auto-approve all changes
-"
+    2. Context Discovery:
+       - Discover implementation files using MCP/ripgrep
+       - Identify existing patterns and conventions (CLAUDE.md)
+       - Map dependencies and integration points
+       - Gather related tests and documentation
+       - Auto-detect file patterns from keywords
 
-# Codex: MODE=auto with danger-full-access
-codex -C . --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
-TASK: [specific implementation]
-MODE: auto
-CONTEXT: [auto-detected files]
-EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+    3. Tool Selection & Execution:
+       - Complexity assessment:
+         * Simple/Medium → Gemini/Qwen (MODE=write, --approval-mode yolo)
+         * Complex → Codex (MODE=auto, --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
+       - Tool preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select based on complexity'}
+       - Apply appropriate implementation template
+       - Execute with YOLO auto-approval (bypasses all confirmations)
+
+    4. Implementation:
+       - Modify/create/delete code files per requirements
+       - Follow existing code patterns and conventions
+       - Include comprehensive context in CLI command
+       - Ensure working implementation with proper error handling
+
+    5. Output & Documentation:
+       - Save execution log: .workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md
+       ${task_id ? '- Generate task summary: .workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/' + task_id + '-summary.md' : ''}
+       ${task_id ? '- Update task status in .task/' + task_id + '.json' : ''}
+       - Document all code changes made
+
+    ⚠️ YOLO Mode: All file operations auto-approved without confirmation
+  `
+)
 ```
 
+**Output**: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md` + `.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
+
 ## Examples
 
-**Basic Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+**Basic Implementation** (modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-# Executes: Creates auth middleware, updates routes, modifies config
+# Agent Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=medium, keywords=['jwt', 'auth', 'middleware']
+# Agent Phase 2: Discovers auth patterns, existing middleware structure
+# Agent Phase 3: Selects Gemini (medium complexity)
+# Agent Phase 4: Executes with auto-approval
 # Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
 ```
 
-**Enhanced Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+**Complex Implementation** (modifies code):
+```bash
+/cli:execute "implement OAuth2 authentication with token refresh"
+# Agent Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=complex, keywords=['oauth2', 'auth', 'token', 'refresh']
+# Agent Phase 2: MCP discovers auth patterns, existing middleware, JWT dependencies
+# Agent Phase 3: Enhances prompt with discovered patterns and best practices
+# Agent Phase 4: Selects Codex (complex task), executes with comprehensive context
+# Agent Phase 5: Saves execution log + generates implementation summary
+# Result: Complete OAuth2 implementation + detailed execution log
+```
+
+**Enhanced Implementation** (modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
 # Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
@@ -141,7 +170,7 @@ EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
 # Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
 ```
 
-**Task Execution** (⚠️ modifies code):
+**Task Execution** (modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute IMPL-001
 # Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
@@ -149,14 +178,14 @@ EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
 # Result: Code changes per task definition
 ```
 
-**Codex Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+**Codex Implementation** (modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
 # Executes: Codex with full file access
 # Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
 ```
 
-**Qwen Code Generation** (⚠️ modifies code):
+**Qwen Code Generation** (modifies code):
 ```bash
 /cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
 # Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
@@ -168,12 +197,6 @@ EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
 
 | Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
 |---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
-| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | ❌ NO | N/A |
-| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | ❌ NO | N/A |
-| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | ✅ **YES** | ✅ **YES** |
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates, YOLO mode details, and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command modifies code - execution logs document changes made
+| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | NO | N/A |
+| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | NO | N/A |
+| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | **YES** | **YES** |

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-diagnosis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+---
+name: bug-diagnosis
+description: Read-only bug root cause analysis using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with systematic diagnosis template for fix suggestions
+argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# CLI Mode: Bug Diagnosis (/cli:mode:bug-diagnosis)
+
+## Purpose
+
+Systematic bug diagnosis with root cause analysis template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`).
+
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **gemini** (default) - Best for bug diagnosis
+- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
+- **codex** - Alternative for complex bug analysis
+
+## Parameters
+
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt`
+- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused diagnosis
+- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error details
+
+## Tool Usage
+
+**Gemini** (Primary):
+```bash
+# Uses gemini by default, or specify explicitly
+--tool gemini
+```
+
+**Qwen** (Fallback):
+```bash
+--tool qwen
+```
+
+**Codex** (Alternative):
+```bash
+--tool codex
+```
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated bug diagnosis:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Bug root cause diagnosis with fix suggestions",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${bug_description}
+    Mode: bug-diagnosis
+    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
+    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
+    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
+    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+
+    Execute systematic bug diagnosis and root cause analysis:
+
+    1. Context Discovery:
+       - Locate error traces, stack traces, and log messages
+       - Find related code sections and affected modules
+       - Identify data flow paths leading to the bug
+       - Discover test cases related to bug area
+       - Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive context gathering
+
+    2. Root Cause Analysis:
+       - Apply diagnostic template methodology
+       - Trace execution to identify failure point
+       - Analyze state, data, and logic causing issue
+       - Document potential root causes with evidence
+       - Assess bug severity and impact scope
+
+    3. CLI Command Construction:
+       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex bugs)
+       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
+       - Context: @**/* + error traces + affected code
+       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
+       - Template: analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+
+    4. Output Generation:
+       - Root cause diagnosis with evidence
+       - Fix suggestions and recommendations
+       - Prevention strategies
+       - Save to .workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-diagnosis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
+  `
+)
+```
+
+## Core Rules
+
+- **Read-only**: Diagnoses bugs, does NOT modify code
+- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`
+- **Output**: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-diagnosis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -1,116 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bug-index
-description: Bug analysis and fix suggestions using CLI tools
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Bug Index (/cli:mode:bug-index)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`).
-
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
-- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error message
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[bug-description]"` first
-3. Parse bug description (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
-5. Build command for selected tool with bug-fix template
-6. Execute analysis (read-only, provides fix recommendations)
-7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes bugs and suggests fixes - it does NOT modify code
-2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
-3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-4. **Template Required**: Always use bug-fix template
-5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results and fix recommendations to session chat
-
-## Analysis Focus (via Template)
-
-- Root cause investigation and diagnosis
-- Code path tracing to locate issues
-- Targeted minimal fix recommendations
-- Impact assessment of proposed changes
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [bug analysis goal]
-TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fix suggestions
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Bug Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Debug authentication null pointer error
-TASK: Identify root cause and provide fix recommendations
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Root cause, code path, minimal fix suggestion, impact assessment
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: null pointer in login flow
-"
-```
-
-**Directory-Specific**:
-```bash
-cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Fix token validation failure
-TASK: Analyze token validation bug in auth module
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Validation logic analysis, fix recommendation with minimal changes
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: token validation fails intermittently
-"
-```
-
-## Bug Investigation Workflow
-
-```bash
-# 1. Find bug-related files
-rg "error_keyword" --files-with-matches
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="error|exception", file_pattern="*.ts")
-
-# 2. Execute bug analysis with focused context (analysis only, no code changes)
-/cli:mode:bug-index --cd "src/module" "specific error description"
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND bug is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR quick debugging**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/bug-index-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-payment-fix`, analyzing payment bug → `.chat/bug-index-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, quick null pointer investigation → `.scratchpad/bug-index-null-pointer-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
-- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive codebase context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md

@@ -1,122 +1,98 @@
 ---
 name: code-analysis
-description: Deep code analysis and debugging using CLI tools with specialized template
+description: Read-only execution path tracing using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with specialized analysis template for call flow and optimization
 argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`).
+Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt`).
+
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **gemini** (default) - Best for code analysis and tracing
+- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
+- **codex** - Alternative for complex analysis tasks
 
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
 **Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
 - `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
 - `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
 - `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
 
+## Tool Usage
+
+**Gemini** (Primary):
+```bash
+/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool gemini "trace auth flow"
+# OR (default)
+/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace auth flow"
+```
+
+**Qwen** (Fallback):
+```bash
+/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen "trace auth flow"
+```
+
+**Codex** (Alternative):
+```bash
+/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex "trace auth flow"
+```
+
 ## Execution Flow
 
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[analysis-target]"` first
-3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
-5. Build command for selected tool with code-analysis template
-6. Execute deep analysis (read-only, no code modification)
-7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
+Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated code analysis:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Execution path tracing and call flow analysis",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${analysis_target}
+    Mode: code-analysis
+    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
+    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
+    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
+    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt
+
+    Execute systematic code analysis with execution path tracing:
+
+    1. Context Discovery:
+       - Identify entry points and function signatures
+       - Trace call chains and execution flows
+       - Discover related files (implementations, dependencies, tests)
+       - Map data flow and state transformations
+       - Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive file discovery
+
+    2. Analysis Execution:
+       - Apply execution tracing template
+       - Generate call flow diagrams (textual)
+       - Document execution paths and branching logic
+       - Identify optimization opportunities
+
+    3. CLI Command Construction:
+       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex analysis)
+       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
+       - Context: @**/* + discovered execution context
+       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
+       - Template: analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt
+
+    4. Output Generation:
+       - Execution trace documentation
+       - Call flow analysis with diagrams
+       - Performance and optimization insights
+       - Save to .workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
+  `
+)
+```
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes code and provides insights - it does NOT modify code
-2. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
-3. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
-4. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-5. **Template Required**: Always use code-analysis template
-6. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
-
-## Analysis Capabilities (via Template)
-
-- **Systematic Code Analysis**: Break down complex code into manageable parts
-- **Execution Path Tracing**: Track variable states and call stacks
-- **Control & Data Flow**: Understand code logic and data transformations
-- **Call Flow Visualization**: Diagram function calling sequences
-- **Logical Reasoning**: Explain "why" behind code behavior
-- **Debugging Insights**: Identify potential bugs or inefficiencies
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal]
-TASK: Systematic code analysis and execution path tracing
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Execution trace, call flow diagram, debugging insights
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [aspect]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Code Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Trace authentication execution flow
-TASK: Analyze complete auth flow from request to response
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Step-by-step execution trace with call diagram, variable states
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on control flow
-"
-```
-
-**Directory-Specific Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Understand JWT token validation logic
-TASK: Trace JWT validation from middleware to service layer
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Validation flow diagram, token lifecycle analysis
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on security
-"
-```
-
-## Code Tracing Workflow
-
-```bash
-# 1. Find entry points and related files
-rg "function.*authenticate|class.*AuthService" --files-with-matches
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="authenticate|login", file_pattern="*.ts")
-
-# 2. Build call graph understanding
-# entry → middleware → service → repository
-
-# 3. Execute deep analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
-/cli:mode:code-analysis --cd "src" "trace execution from entry point"
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR standalone analysis**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/code-analysis-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-auth-refactor`, analyzing auth flow → `.chat/code-analysis-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, tracing request lifecycle → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-request-flow-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`
-- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive code context
+- **Read-only**: Analyzes code, does NOT modify files
+- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt`
+- **Output**: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,120 +1,93 @@
 ---
 name: plan
-description: Project planning and architecture analysis using CLI tools
+description: Read-only architecture planning using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with strategic planning template for modification plans and impact analysis
 argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
 ---
 
 # CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`).
+Strategic software architecture planning template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt`).
 
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped planning
+**Tool Selection**:
+- **gemini** (default) - Best for architecture planning
+- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
+- **codex** - Alternative for implementation planning
 
 ## Parameters
 
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance topic with `/enhance-prompt` first
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
+- `--enhance` - Enhance task with `/enhance-prompt`
 - `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
-- `<topic>` (Required) - Planning topic or architectural question
+- `<planning-task>` (Required) - Architecture planning task or modification requirements
+
+## Tool Usage
+
+**Gemini** (Primary):
+```bash
+--tool gemini  # or omit (default)
+```
+
+**Qwen** (Fallback):
+```bash
+--tool qwen
+```
+
+**Codex** (Alternative):
+```bash
+--tool codex
+```
 
 ## Execution Flow
 
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[topic]"` first
-3. Parse topic (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
-5. Build command for selected tool with planning template
-6. Execute analysis (read-only, no code modification)
-7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
+Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated planning:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  description="Architecture planning with impact analysis",
+  prompt=`
+    Task: ${planning_task}
+    Mode: plan
+    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
+    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
+    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
+    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt
+
+    Execute strategic architecture planning:
+
+    1. Context Discovery:
+       - Analyze current architecture structure
+       - Identify affected components and modules
+       - Map dependencies and integration points
+       - Assess modification impacts (scope, complexity, risks)
+
+    2. Planning Analysis:
+       - Apply strategic planning template
+       - Generate modification plan with phases
+       - Document architectural decisions and rationale
+       - Identify potential conflicts and mitigation strategies
+
+    3. CLI Command Construction:
+       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for implementation guidance)
+       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
+       - Context: @**/* (full architecture context)
+       - Mode: analysis (read-only, no code generation)
+       - Template: planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt
+
+    4. Output Generation:
+       - Strategic modification plan
+       - Impact analysis and risk assessment
+       - Implementation roadmap
+       - Save to .workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
+  `
+)
+```
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Analysis Only**: This command provides planning recommendations and insights - it does NOT modify code
-2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before planning
-3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-4. **Template Required**: Always use planning template
-5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
-
-## Planning Capabilities (via Template)
-
-- Strategic architecture insights and recommendations
-- Implementation roadmaps and suggestions
-- Key technical decisions analysis
-- Risk assessment
-- Resource planning
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [planning goal from topic]
-TASK: Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Strategic insights, implementation recommendations, key decisions
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on [topic area]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Planning Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Design user dashboard architecture
-TASK: Plan dashboard component structure and data flow
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Architecture recommendations, component design, data flow diagram
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on scalability
-"
-```
-
-**Directory-Specific Planning**:
-```bash
-cd src/api && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Plan API refactoring strategy
-TASK: Analyze current API structure and recommend improvements
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Refactoring roadmap, breaking change analysis, migration plan
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Maintain backward compatibility
-"
-```
-
-## Planning Workflow
-
-```bash
-# 1. Discover project structure
-~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
-
-# 2. Gather existing architecture info
-rg "architecture|design" --files-with-matches
-
-# 3. Execute planning analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
-/cli:mode:plan "topic for strategic planning"
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND planning is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR exploratory planning**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/plan-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-dashboard`, planning dashboard architecture → `.chat/plan-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, exploring new feature idea → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`
-- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive project context
+- **Read-only**: Creates modification plans, does NOT generate code
+- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt`
+- **Output**: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/enhance-prompt.md

@@ -1,37 +1,22 @@
 ---
 name: enhance-prompt
-description: Context-aware prompt enhancement using session memory and codebase analysis
+description: Enhanced prompt transformation using session memory and intent analysis with --enhance flag detection
 argument-hint: "user input to enhance"
 ---
 
 ## Overview
 
-Systematically enhances user prompts by combining session memory context with codebase patterns, translating ambiguous requests into actionable specifications.
+Systematically enhances user prompts by leveraging session memory context and intent analysis, translating ambiguous requests into actionable specifications.
 
 ## Core Protocol
 
 **Enhancement Pipeline:**
-`Intent Translation` → `Context Integration` → `Gemini Analysis (if needed)` → `Structured Output`
+`Intent Translation` → `Context Integration` → `Structured Output`
 
 **Context Sources:**
 - Session memory (conversation history, previous analysis)
-- Codebase patterns (via Gemini when triggered)
 - Implicit technical requirements
-
-## Gemini Trigger Logic
-
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION should_use_gemini(user_prompt):
-  critical_keywords = ["refactor", "migrate", "redesign", "auth", "payment", "security"]
-
-  RETURN (
-    prompt_affects_multiple_modules(user_prompt, threshold=3) OR
-    any_keyword_in_prompt(critical_keywords, user_prompt)
-  )
-END
-```
-
-**Gemini Integration:** @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
+- User intent patterns
 
 ## Enhancement Rules
 
@@ -47,22 +32,18 @@ END
 
 ### Context Integration Strategy
 
-**Session Memory First:**
+**Session Memory:**
 - Reference recent conversation context
 - Reuse previously identified patterns
 - Build on established understanding
-
-**Codebase Analysis (via Gemini):**
-- Only when complexity requires it
-- Focus on integration points
-- Identify existing patterns
+- Infer technical requirements from discussion
 
 **Example:**
 ```bash
 # User: "add login"
 # Session Memory: Previous auth discussion, JWT mentioned
 # Inferred: JWT-based auth, integrate with existing session management
-# Gemini (if multi-module): Analyze AuthService patterns, middleware structure
+# Action: Implement JWT authentication with session persistence
 ```
 
 ## Output Structure
@@ -76,7 +57,7 @@ ATTENTION: [Critical constraints]
 
 ### Output Examples
 
-**Simple (no Gemini):**
+**Example 1:**
 ```bash
 # Input: "fix login button"
 INTENT: Debug non-functional login button
@@ -85,28 +66,28 @@ ACTION: Check event binding → verify state updates → test auth flow
 ATTENTION: Preserve existing OAuth integration
 ```
 
-**Complex (with Gemini):**
+**Example 2:**
 ```bash
 # Input: "refactor payment code"
 INTENT: Restructure payment module for maintainability
-CONTEXT: Session memory - PCI compliance requirements
-         Gemini - PaymentService → StripeAdapter pattern identified
-ACTION: Extract reusable validators → isolate payment gateway logic
+CONTEXT: Session memory - PCI compliance requirements, Stripe integration patterns
+ACTION: Extract reusable validators → isolate payment gateway logic → maintain adapter pattern
 ATTENTION: Zero behavior change, maintain PCI compliance, full test coverage
 ```
 
-## Automatic Triggers
+## Enhancement Triggers
 
 - Ambiguous language: "fix", "improve", "clean up"
-- Multi-module impact (>3 modules)
+- Vague requests requiring clarification
+- Complex technical requirements
 - Architecture changes
 - Critical systems: auth, payment, security
-- Complex refactoring
+- Multi-step refactoring
 
 ## Key Principles
 
-1. **Memory First**: Leverage session context before analysis
-2. **Minimal Gemini**: Only when complexity demands it
-3. **Context Reuse**: Build on previous understanding
-4. **Clear Output**: Structured, actionable specifications
+1. **Session Memory First**: Leverage conversation context and established understanding
+2. **Context Reuse**: Build on previous discussions and decisions
+3. **Clear Output**: Structured, actionable specifications
+4. **Intent Clarification**: Transform vague requests into specific technical goals
 5. **Avoid Duplication**: Reference existing context, don't repeat

.claude/commands/memory/code-map-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,764 @@
+---
+name: code-map-memory
+description: 3-phase orchestrator: parse feature keyword → cli-explore-agent analyzes (Deep Scan dual-source) → orchestrator generates Mermaid docs + SKILL package (skips phase 2 if exists)
+argument-hint: "\"feature-keyword\" [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Code Flow Mapping Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Pure Orchestrator with Agent Delegation**: Prepares context paths and delegates code flow analysis to specialized cli-explore-agent. Orchestrator transforms agent's JSON analysis into Mermaid documentation.
+
+**Auto-Continue Workflow**: Runs fully autonomously once triggered. Each phase completes and automatically triggers the next phase.
+
+**Execution Paths**:
+- **Full Path**: All 3 phases (no existing codemap OR `--regenerate` specified)
+- **Skip Path**: Phase 1 → Phase 3 (existing codemap found AND no `--regenerate` flag)
+- **Phase 3 Always Executes**: SKILL index is always generated or updated
+
+**Agent Responsibility** (cli-explore-agent):
+- Deep code flow analysis using dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini CLI)
+- Returns structured JSON with architecture, functions, data flow, conditionals, patterns
+- NO file writing - analysis only
+
+**Orchestrator Responsibility**:
+- Provides feature keyword and analysis scope to agent
+- Transforms agent's JSON into Mermaid-enriched markdown documentation
+- Writes all files (5 docs + metadata.json + SKILL.md)
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+2. **Feature-Specific SKILL**: Each feature creates independent `.claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/` package
+3. **Specialized Agent**: Phase 2a uses cli-explore-agent for professional code analysis (Deep Scan mode)
+4. **Orchestrator Documentation**: Phase 2b transforms agent JSON into Mermaid markdown files
+5. **Auto-Continue**: After completing each phase, update TodoWrite and immediately execute next phase
+6. **No User Prompts**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
+7. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after EVERY phase completion before starting next phase
+8. **Multi-Level Detail**: Generate 4 levels: architecture → function → data → conditional
+
+---
+
+## 3-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Parse Feature Keyword & Check Existing
+
+**Goal**: Normalize feature keyword, check existing codemap, prepare for analysis
+
+**Step 1: Parse Feature Keyword**
+```bash
+# Get feature keyword from argument
+FEATURE_KEYWORD="$1"
+
+# Normalize: lowercase, spaces to hyphens
+normalized_feature=$(echo "$FEATURE_KEYWORD" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '-' | tr '_' '-')
+
+# Example: "User Authentication" → "user-authentication"
+# Example: "支付处理" → "支付处理" (keep non-ASCII)
+```
+
+**Step 2: Set Tool Preference**
+```bash
+# Default to gemini unless --tool specified
+TOOL="${tool_flag:-gemini}"
+```
+
+**Step 3: Check Existing Codemap**
+```bash
+# Define codemap directory
+CODEMAP_DIR=".claude/skills/codemap-${normalized_feature}"
+
+# Check if codemap exists
+bash(test -d "$CODEMAP_DIR" && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+
+# Count existing files
+bash(find "$CODEMAP_DIR" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Step 4: Skip Decision**
+```javascript
+if (existing_files > 0 && !regenerate_flag) {
+  SKIP_GENERATION = true
+  message = "Codemap already exists, skipping Phase 2. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+} else if (regenerate_flag) {
+  bash(rm -rf "$CODEMAP_DIR")
+  SKIP_GENERATION = false
+  message = "Regenerating codemap from scratch."
+} else {
+  SKIP_GENERATION = false
+  message = "No existing codemap found, generating new code flow analysis."
+}
+```
+
+**Output Variables**:
+- `FEATURE_KEYWORD`: Original feature keyword
+- `normalized_feature`: Normalized feature name for directory
+- `CODEMAP_DIR`: `.claude/skills/codemap-{feature}`
+- `TOOL`: CLI tool to use (gemini or qwen)
+- `SKIP_GENERATION`: Boolean - whether to skip Phase 2
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+- If skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+- If not skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Code Flow Analysis & Documentation Generation
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skipped if `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+
+**Goal**: Use cli-explore-agent for professional code analysis, then orchestrator generates Mermaid documentation
+
+**Architecture**: Phase 2a (Agent Analysis) → Phase 2b (Orchestrator Documentation)
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 2a: cli-explore-agent Analysis
+
+**Purpose**: Leverage specialized cli-explore-agent for deep code flow analysis
+
+**Agent Task Specification**:
+
+```
+Task(
+  subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
+  description: "Analyze code flow: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}",
+  prompt: "
+Perform Deep Scan analysis for feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+
+**Analysis Mode**: deep-scan (Dual-source: Bash structural scan + Gemini semantic analysis)
+
+**Analysis Objectives**:
+1. **Module Architecture**: Identify high-level module organization, interactions, and entry points
+2. **Function Call Chains**: Trace execution paths, call sequences, and parameter flows
+3. **Data Transformations**: Map data structure changes and transformation stages
+4. **Conditional Paths**: Document decision trees, branches, and error handling strategies
+5. **Design Patterns**: Discover architectural patterns and extract design intent
+
+**Scope**:
+- Feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+- CLI Tool: {TOOL} (gemini-2.5-pro or qwen coder-model)
+- File Discovery: MCP Code Index (preferred) + rg fallback
+- Target: 5-15 most relevant files
+
+**Expected Output Format**:
+Return comprehensive analysis as structured JSON:
+{
+  \"feature\": \"{FEATURE_KEYWORD}\",
+  \"analysis_metadata\": {
+    \"tool_used\": \"gemini|qwen\",
+    \"timestamp\": \"ISO_TIMESTAMP\",
+    \"analysis_mode\": \"deep-scan\"
+  },
+  \"files_analyzed\": [
+    {\"file\": \"path/to/file.ts\", \"relevance\": \"high|medium|low\", \"role\": \"brief description\"}
+  ],
+  \"architecture\": {
+    \"overview\": \"High-level description\",
+    \"modules\": [
+      {\"name\": \"ModuleName\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"responsibility\": \"description\", \"dependencies\": [...]}
+    ],
+    \"interactions\": [
+      {\"from\": \"ModuleA\", \"to\": \"ModuleB\", \"type\": \"import|call|data-flow\", \"description\": \"...\"}
+    ],
+    \"entry_points\": [
+      {\"function\": \"main\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"description\": \"...\"}
+    ]
+  },
+  \"function_calls\": {
+    \"call_chains\": [
+      {
+        \"chain_id\": 1,
+        \"description\": \"User authentication flow\",
+        \"sequence\": [
+          {\"function\": \"login\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"calls\": [\"validateCredentials\", \"createSession\"]}
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    \"sequences\": [
+      {\"from\": \"Client\", \"to\": \"AuthService\", \"method\": \"login(username, password)\", \"returns\": \"Session\"}
+    ]
+  },
+  \"data_flow\": {
+    \"structures\": [
+      {\"name\": \"UserData\", \"stage\": \"input\", \"shape\": {\"username\": \"string\", \"password\": \"string\"}}
+    ],
+    \"transformations\": [
+      {\"from\": \"RawInput\", \"to\": \"ValidatedData\", \"transformer\": \"validateUser\", \"file\": \"file:line\"}
+    ]
+  },
+  \"conditional_logic\": {
+    \"branches\": [
+      {\"condition\": \"isAuthenticated\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"true_path\": \"...\", \"false_path\": \"...\"}
+    ],
+    \"error_handling\": [
+      {\"error_type\": \"AuthenticationError\", \"handler\": \"handleAuthError\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"recovery\": \"retry|fail\"}
+    ]
+  },
+  \"design_patterns\": [
+    {\"pattern\": \"Repository Pattern\", \"location\": \"src/repositories\", \"description\": \"...\"}
+  ],
+  \"recommendations\": [
+    \"Consider extracting authentication logic into separate module\",
+    \"Add error recovery for network failures\"
+  ]
+}
+
+**Critical Requirements**:
+- Use Deep Scan mode: Bash (Phase 1 - precise locations) + Gemini CLI (Phase 2 - semantic understanding) + Synthesis (Phase 3 - merge with attribution)
+- Focus exclusively on {FEATURE_KEYWORD} feature flow
+- Include file:line references for ALL findings
+- Extract design intent from code structure and comments
+- NO FILE WRITING - return JSON analysis only
+- Handle tool failures gracefully (Gemini → Qwen fallback, MCP → rg fallback)
+  "
+)
+```
+
+**Agent Output**: JSON analysis result with architecture, functions, data flow, conditionals, and patterns
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 2b: Orchestrator Documentation Generation
+
+**Purpose**: Transform cli-explore-agent JSON into Mermaid-enriched documentation
+
+**Input**: Agent's JSON analysis result
+
+**Process**:
+
+1. **Parse Agent Analysis**:
+   ```javascript
+   const analysis = JSON.parse(agentResult)
+   const { feature, files_analyzed, architecture, function_calls, data_flow, conditional_logic, design_patterns } = analysis
+   ```
+
+2. **Generate Mermaid Diagrams from Structured Data**:
+
+   **a) architecture-flow.md** (~3K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert architecture.modules + architecture.interactions → Mermaid graph TD
+   const architectureMermaid = `
+   graph TD
+   ${architecture.modules.map(m => `    ${m.name}[${m.name}]`).join('\n')}
+   ${architecture.interactions.map(i => `    ${i.from} -->|${i.type}| ${i.to}`).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/architecture-flow.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: architecture
+detail: high-level module interactions
+---
+# Architecture Flow: ${feature}
+
+## Overview
+${architecture.overview}
+
+## Module Architecture
+${architecture.modules.map(m => `### ${m.name}\n- **File**: ${m.file}\n- **Role**: ${m.responsibility}\n- **Dependencies**: ${m.dependencies.join(', ')}`).join('\n\n')}
+
+## Flow Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${architectureMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Key Interactions
+${architecture.interactions.map(i => `- **${i.from} → ${i.to}**: ${i.description}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Entry Points
+${architecture.entry_points.map(e => `- **${e.function}** (${e.file}): ${e.description}`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **b) function-calls.md** (~5K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert function_calls.sequences → Mermaid sequenceDiagram
+   const sequenceMermaid = `
+   sequenceDiagram
+   ${function_calls.sequences.map(s => `    ${s.from}->>${s.to}: ${s.method}`).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/function-calls.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: function
+detail: function-level call sequences
+---
+# Function Call Chains: ${feature}
+
+## Call Sequence Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${sequenceMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Detailed Call Chains
+${function_calls.call_chains.map(chain => `
+### Chain ${chain.chain_id}: ${chain.description}
+${chain.sequence.map(fn => `- **${fn.function}** (${fn.file})\n  - Calls: ${fn.calls.join(', ')}`).join('\n')}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+## Parameters & Returns
+${function_calls.sequences.map(s => `- **${s.method}** → Returns: ${s.returns || 'void'}`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **c) data-flow.md** (~4K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert data_flow.transformations → Mermaid flowchart LR
+   const dataFlowMermaid = `
+   flowchart LR
+   ${data_flow.transformations.map((t, i) => `    Stage${i}[${t.from}] -->|${t.transformer}| Stage${i+1}[${t.to}]`).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/data-flow.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: data
+detail: data structure transformations
+---
+# Data Flow: ${feature}
+
+## Data Transformation Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${dataFlowMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Data Structures
+${data_flow.structures.map(s => `### ${s.name} (${s.stage})\n\`\`\`json\n${JSON.stringify(s.shape, null, 2)}\n\`\`\``).join('\n\n')}
+
+## Transformations
+${data_flow.transformations.map(t => `- **${t.from} → ${t.to}** via \`${t.transformer}\` (${t.file})`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **d) conditional-paths.md** (~4K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert conditional_logic.branches → Mermaid flowchart TD
+   const conditionalMermaid = `
+   flowchart TD
+       Start[Entry Point]
+   ${conditional_logic.branches.map((b, i) => `
+       Start --> Check${i}{${b.condition}}
+       Check${i} -->|Yes| Path${i}A[${b.true_path}]
+       Check${i} -->|No| Path${i}B[${b.false_path}]
+   `).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/conditional-paths.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: conditional
+detail: decision trees and error paths
+---
+# Conditional Paths: ${feature}
+
+## Decision Tree
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${conditionalMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Branch Conditions
+${conditional_logic.branches.map(b => `- **${b.condition}** (${b.file})\n  - True: ${b.true_path}\n  - False: ${b.false_path}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Error Handling
+${conditional_logic.error_handling.map(e => `- **${e.error_type}**: Handler \`${e.handler}\` (${e.file}) - Recovery: ${e.recovery}`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **e) complete-flow.md** (~8K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Integrate all Mermaid diagrams
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/complete-flow.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: complete
+detail: integrated multi-level view
+---
+# Complete Flow: ${feature}
+
+## Integrated Flow Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+graph TB
+    subgraph Architecture
+    ${architecture.modules.map(m => `    ${m.name}[${m.name}]`).join('\n')}
+    end
+
+    subgraph "Function Calls"
+    ${function_calls.call_chains[0]?.sequence.map(fn => `    ${fn.function}`).join('\n') || ''}
+    end
+
+    subgraph "Data Flow"
+    ${data_flow.structures.map(s => `    ${s.name}[${s.name}]`).join('\n')}
+    end
+\`\`\`
+
+## Complete Trace
+[Comprehensive end-to-end documentation combining all analysis layers]
+
+## Design Patterns Identified
+${design_patterns.map(p => `- **${p.pattern}** in ${p.location}: ${p.description}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Recommendations
+${analysis.recommendations.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Cross-References
+- [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md) - High-level module structure
+- [Function Calls](./function-calls.md) - Detailed call chains
+- [Data Flow](./data-flow.md) - Data transformation stages
+- [Conditional Paths](./conditional-paths.md) - Decision trees and error handling
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+3. **Write metadata.json**:
+   ```javascript
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/metadata.json`,
+     content: JSON.stringify({
+       feature: feature,
+       normalized_name: normalized_feature,
+       generated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+       tool_used: analysis.analysis_metadata.tool_used,
+       files_analyzed: files_analyzed.map(f => f.file),
+       analysis_summary: {
+         total_files: files_analyzed.length,
+         modules_traced: architecture.modules.length,
+         functions_traced: function_calls.call_chains.reduce((sum, c) => sum + c.sequence.length, 0),
+         patterns_discovered: design_patterns.length
+       }
+     }, null, 2)
+   })
+   ```
+
+4. **Report Phase 2 Completion**:
+   ```
+   Phase 2 Complete: Code flow analysis and documentation generated
+
+   - Agent Analysis: cli-explore-agent with {TOOL}
+   - Files Analyzed: {count}
+   - Documentation Generated: 5 markdown files + metadata.json
+   - Location: {CODEMAP_DIR}
+   ```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- cli-explore-agent task completed successfully with JSON result
+- 5 documentation files written with valid Mermaid diagrams
+- metadata.json written with analysis summary
+- All files properly formatted and cross-referenced
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Generate SKILL.md Index
+
+**Note**: This phase **ALWAYS executes** - generates or updates the SKILL index.
+
+**Goal**: Read generated flow documentation and create SKILL.md index with progressive loading
+
+**Steps**:
+
+1. **Verify Generated Files**:
+   ```bash
+   bash(find "{CODEMAP_DIR}" -name "*.md" -type f | sort)
+   ```
+
+2. **Read metadata.json**:
+   ```javascript
+   Read({CODEMAP_DIR}/metadata.json)
+   // Extract: feature, normalized_name, files_analyzed, analysis_summary
+   ```
+
+3. **Read File Headers** (optional, first 30 lines):
+   ```javascript
+   Read({CODEMAP_DIR}/architecture-flow.md, limit: 30)
+   Read({CODEMAP_DIR}/function-calls.md, limit: 30)
+   // Extract overview and diagram counts
+   ```
+
+4. **Generate SKILL.md Index**:
+
+   Template structure:
+   ```yaml
+   ---
+   name: codemap-{normalized_feature}
+   description: Code flow mapping for {FEATURE_KEYWORD} feature (located at {project_path}). Load this SKILL when analyzing, tracing, or understanding {FEATURE_KEYWORD} execution flow, especially when no relevant context exists in memory.
+   version: 1.0.0
+   generated_at: {ISO_TIMESTAMP}
+   ---
+   # Code Flow Map: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+
+   ## Feature: `{FEATURE_KEYWORD}`
+
+   **Analysis Date**: {DATE}
+   **Tool Used**: {TOOL}
+   **Files Analyzed**: {COUNT}
+
+   ## Progressive Loading
+
+   ### Level 0: Quick Overview (~2K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md) - High-level module interactions
+
+   ### Level 1: Core Flows (~10K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md) - Module architecture
+   - [Function Calls](./function-calls.md) - Function call chains
+
+   ### Level 2: Complete Analysis (~20K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md)
+   - [Function Calls](./function-calls.md)
+   - [Data Flow](./data-flow.md) - Data transformations
+
+   ### Level 3: Deep Dive (~30K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md)
+   - [Function Calls](./function-calls.md)
+   - [Data Flow](./data-flow.md)
+   - [Conditional Paths](./conditional-paths.md) - Branches and error handling
+   - [Complete Flow](./complete-flow.md) - Integrated comprehensive view
+
+   ## Usage
+
+   Load this SKILL package when:
+   - Analyzing {FEATURE_KEYWORD} implementation
+   - Tracing execution flow for debugging
+   - Understanding code dependencies
+   - Planning refactoring or enhancements
+
+   ## Analysis Summary
+
+   - **Modules Traced**: {modules_traced}
+   - **Functions Traced**: {functions_traced}
+   - **Files Analyzed**: {total_files}
+
+   ## Mermaid Diagrams Included
+
+   - Architecture flow diagram (graph TD)
+   - Function call sequence diagram (sequenceDiagram)
+   - Data transformation flowchart (flowchart LR)
+   - Conditional decision tree (flowchart TD)
+   - Complete integrated diagram (graph TB)
+   ```
+
+5. **Write SKILL.md**:
+   ```javascript
+   Write({
+     file_path: `{CODEMAP_DIR}/SKILL.md`,
+     content: generatedIndexMarkdown
+   })
+   ```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- SKILL.md index written
+- All documentation files verified
+- Progressive loading levels (0-3) properly structured
+- Mermaid diagram references included
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
+
+**Final Report**:
+```
+Code Flow Mapping Complete
+
+Feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+Location: .claude/skills/codemap-{normalized_feature}/
+
+Files Generated:
+- SKILL.md (index)
+- architecture-flow.md (with Mermaid diagram)
+- function-calls.md (with Mermaid sequence diagram)
+- data-flow.md (with Mermaid flowchart)
+- conditional-paths.md (with Mermaid decision tree)
+- complete-flow.md (with integrated Mermaid diagram)
+- metadata.json
+
+Analysis:
+- Files analyzed: {count}
+- Modules traced: {count}
+- Functions traced: {count}
+
+Usage: Skill(command: "codemap-{normalized_feature}")
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### TodoWrite Patterns
+
+**Initialization** (Before Phase 1):
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Parsing feature keyword"},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing code flow"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL index"}
+]})
+```
+
+**Full Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = false):
+```javascript
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "in_progress", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", ...}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 2
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 3
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", ...}
+]})
+```
+
+**Skip Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = true):
+```javascript
+// After Phase 1 (skip Phase 2)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "completed", ...},  // Skipped
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
+]})
+```
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+**Full Path**:
+```
+User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (parse) → Phase 2 (agent analyzes) → Phase 3 (write index) → Report
+```
+
+**Skip Path**:
+```
+User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (detect existing) → Phase 3 (update index) → Report
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase 1 Errors**:
+- Empty feature keyword: Report error, ask user to provide feature description
+- Invalid characters: Normalize and continue
+
+**Phase 2 Errors (Agent)**:
+- Agent task fails: Retry once, report if fails again
+- No files discovered: Warn user, ask for more specific feature keyword
+- CLI failures: Agent handles internally with retries
+- Invalid Mermaid syntax: Agent validates before writing
+
+**Phase 3 Errors**:
+- Write failures: Report which files failed
+- Missing files: Note in SKILL.md, suggest regeneration
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:code-map-memory "feature-keyword" [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]
+```
+
+**Arguments**:
+- **"feature-keyword"**: Feature or flow to analyze (required)
+  - Examples: `"user authentication"`, `"payment processing"`, `"数据导入流程"`
+  - Can be English, Chinese, or mixed
+  - Spaces and underscores normalized to hyphens
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate existing codemap (deletes and recreates)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool for analysis (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive flow analysis with gemini-2.5-pro
+  - `qwen`: Alternative with coder-model
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+**Generated File Structure** (for all examples):
+```
+.claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/
+├── SKILL.md                    # Index (Phase 3)
+├── architecture-flow.md        # Agent (Phase 2) - High-level flow
+├── function-calls.md           # Agent (Phase 2) - Function chains
+├── data-flow.md                # Agent (Phase 2) - Data transformations
+├── conditional-paths.md        # Agent (Phase 2) - Branches & errors
+├── complete-flow.md            # Agent (Phase 2) - Integrated view
+└── metadata.json               # Agent (Phase 2)
+```
+
+### Example 1: User Authentication Flow
+
+```bash
+/memory:code-map-memory "user authentication"
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Normalizes to "user-authentication", checks existing codemap
+2. Phase 2: Agent discovers auth-related files, executes CLI analysis, generates 5 flow docs with Mermaid
+3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index with progressive loading
+
+**Output**: `.claude/skills/codemap-user-authentication/` with 6 files + metadata
+
+
+### Example 3: Regenerate with Qwen
+
+```bash
+/memory:code-map-memory "payment processing" --regenerate --tool qwen
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Deletes existing codemap due to --regenerate
+2. Phase 2: Agent uses qwen with coder-model for fresh analysis
+3. Phase 3: Generates updated SKILL.md
+
+---
+
+## Benefits
+
+- **Per-Feature SKILL**: Independent packages for each analyzed feature
+- **Specialized Agent**: cli-explore-agent with Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source)
+- **Professional Analysis**: Pre-defined workflow for code exploration and structure analysis
+- **Clear Separation**: Agent analyzes (JSON) → Orchestrator documents (Mermaid markdown)
+- **Multi-Level Detail**: 4 levels (architecture → function → data → conditional)
+- **Visual Flow**: Embedded Mermaid diagrams for all flow types
+- **Progressive Loading**: Token-efficient context loading (2K → 30K)
+- **Auto-Continue**: Fully autonomous 3-phase execution
+- **Smart Skip**: Detects existing codemap, 10x faster index updates
+- **CLI Integration**: Gemini/Qwen for deep semantic understanding
+
+## Architecture
+
+```
+code-map-memory (orchestrator)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Parse & Check (bash commands, skip decision)
+  ├─ Phase 2: Code Analysis & Documentation (skippable)
+  │   ├─ Phase 2a: cli-explore-agent Analysis
+  │   │   └─ Deep Scan: Bash structural + Gemini semantic → JSON
+  │   └─ Phase 2b: Orchestrator Documentation
+  │       └─ Transform JSON → 5 Mermaid markdown files + metadata.json
+  └─ Phase 3: Write SKILL.md (index generation, always runs)
+
+Benefits:
+✅ Specialized agent: cli-explore-agent with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini)
+✅ Professional analysis: Pre-defined Deep Scan workflow
+✅ Clear separation: Agent analyzes (JSON) → Orchestrator documents (Mermaid)
+✅ Smart skip logic: 10x faster when codemap exists
+✅ Multi-level detail: Architecture → Functions → Data → Conditionals
+
+Output: .claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/
+```

.claude/commands/memory/docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,609 @@
+---
+name: docs
+description: Plan documentation workflow with dynamic grouping (≤10 docs/task), generates IMPL tasks for parallel module trees, README, ARCHITECTURE, and HTTP API docs
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]"
+---
+
+# Documentation Workflow (/memory:docs)
+
+## Overview
+Lightweight planner that analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. Does NOT generate documentation content itself - delegates to doc-generator agent.
+
+**Execution Strategy**:
+- **Dynamic Task Grouping**: Level 1 tasks grouped by top-level directories with document count limit
+  - **Primary constraint**: Each task generates ≤10 documents (API.md + README.md count)
+  - **Optimization goal**: Prefer grouping 2 top-level directories per task for context sharing
+  - **Conflict resolution**: If 2 dirs exceed 10 docs, reduce to 1 dir/task; if 1 dir exceeds 10 docs, split by subdirectories
+  - **Context benefit**: Same-task directories analyzed together via single Gemini call
+- **Parallel Execution**: Multiple Level 1 tasks execute concurrently for faster completion
+- **Pre-computed Analysis**: Phase 2 performs unified analysis once, stored in `.process/` for reuse
+- **Efficient Data Loading**: All existing docs loaded once in Phase 2, shared across tasks
+
+**Path Mirroring**: Documentation structure mirrors source code under `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/`
+- Example: `my_app/src/core/` → `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/core/API.md`
+
+**Two Execution Modes**:
+- **Default (Agent Mode)**: CLI analyzes in `pre_analysis` (MODE=analysis), agent writes docs
+- **--cli-execute (CLI Mode)**: CLI generates docs in `implementation_approach` (MODE=write), agent executes CLI commands
+
+## Path Mirroring Strategy
+
+**Principle**: Documentation structure **mirrors** source code structure under project-specific directory.
+
+| Source Path | Project Name | Documentation Path |
+|------------|--------------|-------------------|
+| `my_app/src/core/` | `my_app` | `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/core/API.md` |
+| `my_app/src/modules/auth/` | `my_app` | `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/modules/auth/API.md` |
+| `another_project/lib/utils/` | `another_project` | `.workflow/docs/another_project/lib/utils/API.md` |
+
+**Benefits**: Easy to locate documentation, maintains logical organization, clear 1:1 mapping, supports any project structure.
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:docs [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]
+```
+
+- **path**: Target directory (default: current directory)
+- **--mode**: Documentation generation mode (default: full)
+  - `full`: Complete documentation (modules + README + ARCHITECTURE + EXAMPLES + HTTP API)
+  - `partial`: Module documentation only (API.md + README.md)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool selection (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
+- **--cli-execute**: Enable CLI-based documentation generation (optional)
+
+## Planning Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Initialize Session
+
+```bash
+# Get target path, project name, and root
+bash(pwd && basename "$(pwd)" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd && date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+
+# Create session directories (replace timestamp)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.{task,process,summaries} && touch .workflow/.active-WFS-docs-{timestamp})
+
+# Create workflow-session.json (replace values)
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-docs-{timestamp}","project":"{project} documentation","status":"planning","timestamp":"2024-01-20T14:30:22+08:00","path":".","target_path":"{target_path}","project_root":"{project_root}","project_name":"{project_name}","mode":"full","tool":"gemini","cli_execute":false}' | jq '.' > .workflow/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/workflow-session.json)
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analyze Structure
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/vendor based on project tech stack.
+
+**Commands** (collect data with simple bash):
+
+```bash
+# 1. Run folder analysis
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh)
+
+# 2. Get top-level directories (first 2 path levels)
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh | awk -F'|' '{print $1}' | sed 's|^\./||' | awk -F'/' '{if(NF>=2) print $1"/"$2; else if(NF==1) print $1}' | sort -u)
+
+# 3. Find existing docs (if directory exists)
+bash(if [ -d .workflow/docs/\${project_name} ]; then find .workflow/docs/\${project_name} -type f -name "*.md" ! -path "*/README.md" ! -path "*/ARCHITECTURE.md" ! -path "*/EXAMPLES.md" ! -path "*/api/*" 2>/dev/null; fi)
+
+# 4. Read existing docs content (if files exist)
+bash(if [ -d .workflow/docs/\${project_name} ]; then find .workflow/docs/\${project_name} -type f -name "*.md" ! -path "*/README.md" ! -path "*/ARCHITECTURE.md" ! -path "*/EXAMPLES.md" ! -path "*/api/*" 2>/dev/null | xargs cat 2>/dev/null; fi)
+```
+
+**Data Processing**: Parse bash outputs, calculate statistics, use **Write tool** to create `${session_dir}/.process/phase2-analysis.json` with structure:
+
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "generated_at": "2025-11-03T16:57:30.469669",
+    "project_name": "project_name",
+    "project_root": "/path/to/project"
+  },
+  "folder_analysis": [
+    {"path": "./src/core", "type": "code", "code_count": 5, "dirs_count": 2}
+  ],
+  "top_level_dirs": ["src/modules", "lib/core"],
+  "existing_docs": {
+    "file_list": [".workflow/docs/project/src/core/API.md"],
+    "content": "... existing docs content ..."
+  },
+  "unified_analysis": [],
+  "statistics": {
+    "total": 15,
+    "code": 8,
+    "navigation": 7,
+    "top_level": 3
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Then** use **Edit tool** to update `workflow-session.json` adding analysis field.
+
+**Output**: Single `phase2-analysis.json` with all analysis data (no temp files or Python scripts).
+
+**Auto-skipped**: Tests (`**/test/**`, `**/*.test.*`), Build (`**/node_modules/**`, `**/dist/**`), Config (root-level files), Vendor directories.
+
+### Phase 3: Detect Update Mode
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# Count existing docs from phase2-analysis.json
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.process/phase2-analysis.json | jq '.existing_docs.file_list | length')
+```
+
+**Data Processing**: Use count result, then use **Edit tool** to update `workflow-session.json`:
+- Add `"update_mode": "update"` if count > 0, else `"create"`
+- Add `"existing_docs": <count>`
+
+### Phase 4: Decompose Tasks
+
+**Task Hierarchy** (Dynamic based on document count):
+
+```
+Small Projects (total ≤10 docs):
+  Level 1: IMPL-001 (all directories in single task, shared context)
+  Level 2: IMPL-002 (README, full mode only)
+  Level 3: IMPL-003 (ARCHITECTURE+EXAMPLES), IMPL-004 (HTTP API, optional)
+
+Medium Projects (Example: 7 top-level dirs, 18 total docs):
+  Step 1: Count docs per top-level dir
+    ├─ dir1: 3 docs, dir2: 4 docs → Group 1 (7 docs)
+    ├─ dir3: 5 docs, dir4: 3 docs → Group 2 (8 docs)
+    ├─ dir5: 2 docs → Group 3 (2 docs, can add more)
+
+  Step 2: Create tasks with ≤10 docs constraint
+  Level 1: IMPL-001 to IMPL-003 (parallel groups)
+    ├─ IMPL-001: Group 1 (dir1 + dir2, 7 docs, shared context)
+    ├─ IMPL-002: Group 2 (dir3 + dir4, 8 docs, shared context)
+    └─ IMPL-003: Group 3 (remaining dirs, ≤10 docs)
+  Level 2: IMPL-004 (README, depends on Level 1, full mode only)
+  Level 3: IMPL-005 (ARCHITECTURE+EXAMPLES), IMPL-006 (HTTP API, optional)
+
+Large Projects (single dir >10 docs):
+  Step 1: Detect oversized directory
+    └─ src/modules/: 15 subdirs → 30 docs (exceeds limit)
+
+  Step 2: Split by subdirectories
+  Level 1: IMPL-001 to IMPL-003 (split oversized dir)
+    ├─ IMPL-001: src/modules/ subdirs 1-5 (10 docs)
+    ├─ IMPL-002: src/modules/ subdirs 6-10 (10 docs)
+    └─ IMPL-003: src/modules/ subdirs 11-15 (10 docs)
+```
+
+**Grouping Algorithm**:
+1. Count total docs for each top-level directory
+2. Try grouping 2 directories (optimization for context sharing)
+3. If group exceeds 10 docs, split to 1 dir/task
+4. If single dir exceeds 10 docs, split by subdirectories
+5. Create parallel Level 1 tasks with ≤10 docs each
+
+**Benefits**: Parallel execution, failure isolation, progress visibility, context sharing, document count control.
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Get top-level directories from phase2-analysis.json
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.process/phase2-analysis.json | jq -r '.top_level_dirs[]')
+
+# 2. Get mode from workflow-session.json
+bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/workflow-session.json | jq -r '.mode // "full"')
+
+# 3. Check for HTTP API
+bash(grep -r "router\.|@Get\|@Post" src/ 2>/dev/null && echo "API_FOUND" || echo "NO_API")
+```
+
+**Data Processing**:
+1. Count documents for each top-level directory (from folder_analysis):
+   - Code folders: 2 docs each (API.md + README.md)
+   - Navigation folders: 1 doc each (README.md only)
+2. Apply grouping algorithm with ≤10 docs constraint:
+   - Try grouping 2 directories, calculate total docs
+   - If total ≤10 docs: create group
+   - If total >10 docs: split to 1 dir/group or subdivide
+   - If single dir >10 docs: split by subdirectories
+3. Use **Edit tool** to update `phase2-analysis.json` adding groups field:
+   ```json
+   "groups": {
+     "count": 3,
+     "assignments": [
+       {"group_id": "001", "directories": ["src/modules", "src/utils"], "doc_count": 5},
+       {"group_id": "002", "directories": ["lib/core"], "doc_count": 6},
+       {"group_id": "003", "directories": ["lib/helpers"], "doc_count": 3}
+     ]
+   }
+   ```
+
+**Task ID Calculation**:
+```bash
+group_count=$(jq '.groups.count' .workflow/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.process/phase2-analysis.json)
+readme_id=$((group_count + 1))   # Next ID after groups
+arch_id=$((group_count + 2))
+api_id=$((group_count + 3))
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Task JSONs
+
+**CLI Strategy**:
+
+| Mode | cli_execute | Placement | CLI MODE | Approval Flag | Agent Role |
+|------|-------------|-----------|----------|---------------|------------|
+| **Agent** | false | pre_analysis | analysis | (none) | Generate docs in implementation_approach |
+| **CLI** | true | implementation_approach | write | --approval-mode yolo | Execute CLI commands, validate output |
+
+**Command Patterns**:
+- Gemini/Qwen: `cd dir && gemini -p "..."`
+- CLI Mode: `cd dir && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p "..."`
+- Codex: `codex -C dir --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+
+**Generation Process**:
+1. Read configuration values (tool, cli_execute, mode) from workflow-session.json
+2. Read group assignments from phase2-analysis.json
+3. Generate Level 1 tasks (IMPL-001 to IMPL-N, one per group)
+4. Generate Level 2+ tasks if mode=full (README, ARCHITECTURE, HTTP API)
+
+## Task Templates
+
+### Level 1: Module Trees Group Task (Unified)
+
+**Execution Model**: Each task processes assigned directory group (max 2 directories) using pre-analyzed data from Phase 2.
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${group_number}",
+  "title": "Document Module Trees Group ${group_number}",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs-tree-group",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_execute": false,
+    "group_number": "${group_number}",
+    "total_groups": "${total_groups}"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Process directories from group ${group_number} in phase2-analysis.json",
+      "Generate docs to .workflow/docs/${project_name}/ (mirrored structure)",
+      "Code folders: API.md + README.md; Navigation folders: README.md only",
+      "Use pre-analyzed data from Phase 2 (no redundant analysis)"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["${group_dirs_from_json}"],
+    "precomputed_data": {
+      "phase2_analysis": "${session_dir}/.process/phase2-analysis.json"
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_precomputed_data",
+        "action": "Load Phase 2 analysis and extract group directories",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/phase2-analysis.json)",
+          "bash(jq '.groups.assignments[] | select(.group_id == \"${group_number}\") | .directories' ${session_dir}/.process/phase2-analysis.json)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "phase2_context",
+        "note": "Single JSON file contains all Phase 2 analysis results"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate documentation for assigned directory group",
+        "description": "Process directories in Group ${group_number} using pre-analyzed data",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Read group directories from [phase2_context].groups.assignments[${group_number}].directories",
+          "For each directory: parse folder types from folder_analysis, parse structure from unified_analysis",
+          "Map source_path to .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{path}",
+          "Generate API.md for code folders, README.md for all folders",
+          "Preserve user modifications from [phase2_context].existing_docs.content"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "phase2 = parse([phase2_context])",
+          "dirs = phase2.groups.assignments[${group_number}].directories",
+          "for dir in dirs:",
+          "  folder_info = find(dir, phase2.folder_analysis)",
+          "  outline = find(dir, phase2.unified_analysis)",
+          "  if folder_info.type == 'code': generate API.md + README.md",
+          "  elif folder_info.type == 'navigation': generate README.md only",
+          "  write to .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{dir}/"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "group_module_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/*/API.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/*/README.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**CLI Execute Mode Note**: When `cli_execute=true`, add Step 2 in `implementation_approach`:
+```json
+{
+  "step": 2,
+  "title": "Batch generate documentation via CLI",
+  "command": "bash(dirs=$(jq -r '.groups.assignments[] | select(.group_id == \"${group_number}\") | .directories[]' ${session_dir}/.process/phase2-analysis.json); for dir in $dirs; do cd \"$dir\" && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p \"PURPOSE: Generate module docs\\nTASK: Create documentation\\nMODE: write\\nCONTEXT: @**/* [phase2_context]\\nEXPECTED: API.md and README.md\\nRULES: Mirror structure\" || echo \"Failed: $dir\"; cd -; done)",
+  "depends_on": [1],
+  "output": "generated_docs"
+}
+```
+
+### Level 2: Project README Task
+
+**Task ID**: `IMPL-${readme_id}` (where `readme_id = group_count + 1`)
+**Dependencies**: Depends on all Level 1 tasks completing.
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${readme_id}",
+  "title": "Generate Project README",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "...", "IMPL-${group_count}"],
+  "meta": {"type": "docs", "agent": "@doc-generator", "tool": "gemini", "cli_execute": false},
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_readme",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing README')",
+        "output_to": "existing_readme"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_module_docs",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/${project_name} -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/*' | xargs cat)",
+        "output_to": "all_module_docs"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_project",
+        "command": "bash(gemini \"PURPOSE: Analyze project structure\\nTASK: Extract overview from modules\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Project outline\")",
+        "output_to": "project_outline"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate project README",
+        "description": "Generate project README with navigation links while preserving user modifications",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [project_outline] and [all_module_docs]",
+          "Generate README structure with navigation links",
+          "Preserve [existing_readme] user modifications"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": ["Parse data", "Generate README with navigation", "Preserve modifications"],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "project_readme"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 3: Architecture & Examples Documentation Task
+
+**Task ID**: `IMPL-${arch_id}` (where `arch_id = group_count + 2`)
+**Dependencies**: Depends on Level 2 (Project README).
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${arch_id}",
+  "title": "Generate Architecture & Examples Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-${readme_id}"],
+  "meta": {"type": "docs", "agent": "@doc-generator", "tool": "gemini", "cli_execute": false},
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {"step": "load_existing_docs", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{ARCHITECTURE,EXAMPLES}.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing docs')", "output_to": "existing_arch_examples"},
+      {"step": "load_all_docs", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md && find .workflow/docs/${project_name} -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '*/README.md' ! -path '*/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '*/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '*/api/*' | xargs cat)", "output_to": "all_docs"},
+      {"step": "analyze_architecture", "command": "bash(gemini \"PURPOSE: Analyze system architecture\\nTASK: Synthesize architectural overview and examples\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture + Examples outline\")", "output_to": "arch_examples_outline"}
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate architecture and examples documentation",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [arch_examples_outline] and [all_docs]",
+          "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md (system design, patterns)",
+          "Generate EXAMPLES.md (code snippets, usage)",
+          "Preserve [existing_arch_examples] modifications"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "arch_examples_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/${project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md", ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/EXAMPLES.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 4: HTTP API Documentation Task (Optional)
+
+**Task ID**: `IMPL-${api_id}` (where `api_id = group_count + 3`)
+**Dependencies**: Depends on Level 3.
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${api_id}",
+  "title": "Generate HTTP API Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-${arch_id}"],
+  "meta": {"type": "docs", "agent": "@doc-generator", "tool": "gemini", "cli_execute": false},
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {"step": "discover_api", "command": "bash(rg 'router\\.| @(Get|Post)' -g '*.{ts,js}')", "output_to": "endpoint_discovery"},
+      {"step": "load_existing_api", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing API docs')", "output_to": "existing_api_docs"},
+      {"step": "analyze_api", "command": "bash(gemini \"PURPOSE: Document HTTP API\\nTASK: Analyze endpoints\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @src/api/**/* [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: API outline\")", "output_to": "api_outline"}
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate HTTP API documentation",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [api_outline] and [endpoint_discovery]",
+          "Document endpoints, request/response formats",
+          "Preserve [existing_api_docs] modifications"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "api_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Session Structure
+
+**Unified Structure** (single JSON replaces multiple text files):
+
+```
+.workflow/
+├── .active-WFS-docs-{timestamp}
+└── WFS-docs-{timestamp}/
+    ├── workflow-session.json            # Session metadata
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md
+    ├── .process/
+    │   └── phase2-analysis.json         # All Phase 2 analysis data (replaces 7+ files)
+    └── .task/
+        ├── IMPL-001.json                # Small: all modules | Large: group 1
+        ├── IMPL-00N.json                # (Large only: groups 2-N)
+        ├── IMPL-{N+1}.json              # README (full mode)
+        ├── IMPL-{N+2}.json              # ARCHITECTURE+EXAMPLES (full mode)
+        └── IMPL-{N+3}.json              # HTTP API (optional)
+```
+
+**phase2-analysis.json Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "generated_at": "2025-11-03T16:41:06+08:00",
+    "project_name": "Claude_dms3",
+    "project_root": "/d/Claude_dms3"
+  },
+  "folder_analysis": [
+    {"path": "./src/core", "type": "code", "code_count": 5, "dirs_count": 2},
+    {"path": "./src/utils", "type": "navigation", "code_count": 0, "dirs_count": 4}
+  ],
+  "top_level_dirs": ["src/modules", "src/utils", "lib/core"],
+  "existing_docs": {
+    "file_list": [".workflow/docs/project/src/core/API.md"],
+    "content": "... concatenated existing docs ..."
+  },
+  "unified_analysis": [
+    {"module_path": "./src/core", "outline_summary": "Core functionality"}
+  ],
+  "groups": {
+    "count": 4,
+    "assignments": [
+      {"group_id": "001", "directories": ["src/modules", "src/utils"], "doc_count": 6},
+      {"group_id": "002", "directories": ["lib/core", "lib/helpers"], "doc_count": 7}
+    ]
+  },
+  "statistics": {
+    "total": 15,
+    "code": 8,
+    "navigation": 7,
+    "top_level": 3
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Workflow Session Structure** (workflow-session.json):
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-docs-{timestamp}",
+  "project": "{project_name} documentation",
+  "status": "planning",
+  "timestamp": "2024-01-20T14:30:22+08:00",
+  "path": ".",
+  "target_path": "/path/to/project",
+  "project_root": "/path/to/project",
+  "project_name": "{project_name}",
+  "mode": "full",
+  "tool": "gemini",
+  "cli_execute": false,
+  "update_mode": "update",
+  "existing_docs": 5,
+  "analysis": {
+    "total": "15",
+    "code": "8",
+    "navigation": "7",
+    "top_level": "3"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Generated Documentation
+
+**Structure mirrors project source directories under project-specific folder**:
+
+```
+.workflow/docs/
+└── {project_name}/                    # Project-specific root
+    ├── src/                           # Mirrors src/ directory
+    │   ├── modules/
+    │   │   ├── README.md              # Navigation
+    │   │   ├── auth/
+    │   │   │   ├── API.md             # API signatures
+    │   │   │   ├── README.md          # Module docs
+    │   │   │   └── middleware/
+    │   │   │       ├── API.md
+    │   │   │       └── README.md
+    │   │   └── api/
+    │   │       ├── API.md
+    │   │       └── README.md
+    │   └── utils/
+    │       └── README.md
+    ├── lib/                           # Mirrors lib/ directory
+    │   └── core/
+    │       ├── API.md
+    │       └── README.md
+    ├── README.md                      # Project root
+    ├── ARCHITECTURE.md                # System design
+    ├── EXAMPLES.md                    # Usage examples
+    └── api/                           # Optional
+        └── README.md                  # HTTP API reference
+```
+
+## Execution Commands
+
+```bash
+# Execute entire workflow (auto-discovers active session)
+/workflow:execute
+
+# Or specify session
+/workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-docs-yyyymmdd-hhmmss"
+
+# Individual task execution
+/task:execute IMPL-001
+```
+
+## Template Reference
+
+**Available Templates** (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/`):
+- `api.txt`: Code API (Part A) + HTTP API (Part B)
+- `module-readme.txt`: Module purpose, usage, dependencies
+- `folder-navigation.txt`: Navigation README for folders with subdirectories
+- `project-readme.txt`: Project overview, getting started, navigation
+- `project-architecture.txt`: System structure, module map, design patterns
+- `project-examples.txt`: End-to-end usage examples
+
+## Execution Mode Summary
+
+| Mode | CLI Placement | CLI MODE | Approval Flag | Agent Role |
+|------|---------------|----------|---------------|------------|
+| **Agent (default)** | pre_analysis | analysis | (none) | Generates documentation content |
+| **CLI (--cli-execute)** | implementation_approach | write | --approval-mode yolo | Executes CLI commands, validates output |
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+- **Phase 2**: Unified analysis once, results in `.process/`
+- **Phase 4**: Dynamic grouping (max 2 dirs per group)
+- **Level 1**: Parallel processing for module tree groups
+- **Level 2+**: Sequential execution for project-level docs
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute documentation tasks
+- `/workflow:status` - View task progress
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Mark session complete

.claude/commands/memory/load-skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+---
+name: load-skill-memory
+description: Activate SKILL package (auto-detect from paths/keywords or manual) and intelligently load documentation based on task intent keywords
+argument-hint: "[skill_name] \"task intent description\""
+allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Skill(*)
+---
+
+# Memory Load SKILL Command (/memory:load-skill-memory)
+
+## 1. Overview
+
+The `memory:load-skill-memory` command **activates SKILL package** (auto-detect from task or manual specification) and intelligently loads documentation based on user's task intent. The system automatically determines which documentation files to read based on the intent description.
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Flexible Activation**: Auto-detect skill from task description/paths, or user explicitly specifies
+- **Intent-Driven Loading**: System analyzes task intent to determine documentation scope
+- **Intelligent Selection**: Automatically chooses appropriate documentation level and modules
+- **Direct Context Loading**: Loads selected documentation into conversation memory
+
+**When to Use**:
+- Manually activate a known SKILL package for a specific task
+- Load SKILL context when system hasn't auto-triggered it
+- Force reload SKILL documentation with specific intent focus
+
+**Note**: Normal SKILL activation happens automatically via description triggers or path mentions (system extracts skill name from file paths for intelligent triggering). Use this command only when manual activation is needed.
+
+## 2. Parameters
+
+- `[skill_name]` (Optional): Name of SKILL package to activate
+  - If omitted: System auto-detects from task description or file paths
+  - If specified: Direct activation of named SKILL package
+  - Example: `my_project`, `api_service`
+  - Must match directory name under `.claude/skills/`
+
+- `"task intent description"` (Required): Description of what you want to do
+  - Used for both: auto-detection (if skill_name omitted) and documentation scope selection
+  - **Analysis tasks**: "分析builder pattern实现", "理解参数系统架构"
+  - **Modification tasks**: "修改workflow逻辑", "增强thermal template功能"
+  - **Learning tasks**: "学习接口设计模式", "了解测试框架使用"
+  - **With paths**: "修改D:\projects\my_project\src\auth.py的认证逻辑" (auto-extracts `my_project`)
+
+## 3. Execution Flow
+
+### Step 1: Determine SKILL Name (if not provided)
+
+**Auto-Detection Strategy** (when skill_name parameter is omitted):
+1. **Path Extraction**: Scan task description for file paths
+   - Extract potential project names from path segments
+   - Example: `"修改D:\projects\my_project\src\auth.py"` → extracts `my_project`
+2. **Keyword Matching**: Match task keywords against SKILL descriptions
+   - Search for project-specific terms, domain keywords
+3. **Validation**: Check if extracted name matches `.claude/skills/{skill_name}/`
+
+**Result**: Either uses provided skill_name or auto-detected name for activation
+
+### Step 2: Activate SKILL and Analyze Intent
+
+**Activate SKILL Package**:
+```javascript
+Skill(command: "${skill_name}")  // Uses provided or auto-detected name
+```
+
+**What Happens After Activation**:
+1. If SKILL exists in memory: System reads `.claude/skills/${skill_name}/SKILL.md`
+2. If SKILL not found in memory: Error - SKILL package doesn't exist
+3. SKILL description triggers are loaded into memory
+4. Progressive loading mechanism becomes available
+5. Documentation structure is now accessible
+
+**Intent Analysis**:
+Based on task intent description, system determines:
+- **Action type**: analyzing, modifying, learning
+- **Scope**: specific module, architecture overview, complete system
+- **Depth**: quick reference, detailed API, full documentation
+
+### Step 3: Intelligent Documentation Loading
+
+**Loading Strategy**:
+
+The system automatically selects documentation based on intent keywords:
+
+1. **Quick Understanding** ("了解", "快速理解", "什么是"):
+   - Load: Level 0 (README.md only, ~2K tokens)
+   - Use case: Quick overview of capabilities
+
+2. **Specific Module Analysis** ("分析XXX模块", "理解XXX实现"):
+   - Load: Module-specific README.md + API.md (~5K tokens)
+   - Use case: Deep dive into specific component
+
+3. **Architecture Review** ("架构", "设计模式", "整体结构"):
+   - Load: README.md + ARCHITECTURE.md (~10K tokens)
+   - Use case: System design understanding
+
+4. **Implementation/Modification** ("修改", "增强", "实现"):
+   - Load: Relevant module docs + EXAMPLES.md (~15K tokens)
+   - Use case: Code modification with examples
+
+5. **Comprehensive Learning** ("学习", "完整了解", "深入理解"):
+   - Load: Level 3 (All documentation, ~40K tokens)
+   - Use case: Complete system mastery
+
+**Documentation Loaded into Memory**:
+After loading, the selected documentation content is available in conversation memory for subsequent operations.
+
+## 4. Usage Examples
+
+### Example 1: Manual Specification
+
+**User Command**:
+```bash
+/memory:load-skill-memory my_project "修改认证模块增加OAuth支持"
+```
+
+**Execution**:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Use provided skill_name
+skill_name = "my_project"  // Directly from parameter
+
+// Step 2: Activate SKILL
+Skill(command: "my_project")
+
+// Step 3: Intent Analysis
+Keywords: ["修改", "认证模块", "增加", "OAuth"]
+Action: modifying (implementation)
+Scope: auth module + examples
+
+// Load documentation based on intent
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/auth/README.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/auth/API.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/EXAMPLES.md)
+```
+
+### Example 2: Auto-Detection from Path
+
+**User Command**:
+```bash
+/memory:load-skill-memory "修改D:\projects\my_project\src\services\api.py的接口逻辑"
+```
+
+**Execution**:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Auto-detect skill_name from path
+Path detected: "D:\projects\my_project\src\services\api.py"
+Extracted: "my_project"
+Validated: .claude/skills/my_project/ exists ✓
+skill_name = "my_project"
+
+// Step 2: Activate SKILL
+Skill(command: "my_project")
+
+// Step 3: Intent Analysis
+Keywords: ["修改", "services", "接口逻辑"]
+Action: modifying (implementation)
+Scope: services module + examples
+
+// Load documentation based on intent
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/services/README.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/services/API.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/EXAMPLES.md)
+```
+
+## 5. Intent Keyword Mapping
+
+**Quick Reference**:
+- **Triggers**: "了解", "快速", "什么是", "简介"
+- **Loads**: README.md only (~2K)
+
+**Module-Specific**:
+- **Triggers**: "XXX模块", "XXX组件", "分析XXX"
+- **Loads**: Module README + API (~5K)
+
+**Architecture**:
+- **Triggers**: "架构", "设计", "整体结构", "系统设计"
+- **Loads**: README + ARCHITECTURE (~10K)
+
+**Implementation**:
+- **Triggers**: "修改", "增强", "实现", "开发", "集成"
+- **Loads**: Relevant module + EXAMPLES (~15K)
+
+**Comprehensive**:
+- **Triggers**: "完整", "深入", "全面", "学习整个"
+- **Loads**: All documentation (~40K)

.claude/commands/memory/load.md

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+---
+name: load
+description: Delegate to universal-executor agent to analyze project via Gemini/Qwen CLI and return JSON core content package for task context
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen] \"task context description\""
+allowed-tools: Task(*), Bash(*)
+examples:
+  - /memory:load "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
+  - /memory:load --tool qwen -p "重构支付模块API"
+---
+
+# Memory Load Command (/memory:load)
+
+## 1. Overview
+
+The `memory:load` command **delegates to a universal-executor agent** to analyze the project and return a structured "Core Content Pack". This pack is loaded into the main thread's memory, providing essential context for subsequent agent operations while minimizing token consumption.
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Agent-Driven**: Fully delegates execution to universal-executor agent
+- **Read-Only Analysis**: Does not modify code, only extracts context
+- **Structured Output**: Returns standardized JSON content package
+- **Memory Optimization**: Package loaded directly into main thread memory
+- **Token Efficiency**: CLI analysis executed within agent to save tokens
+
+## 2. Parameters
+
+- `"task context description"` (Required): Task description to guide context extraction
+  - Example: "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
+  - Example: "重构支付模块API"
+  - Example: "修复数据库查询性能问题"
+
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen>` (Optional): Specify CLI tool for agent to use (default: gemini)
+  - gemini: Large context window, suitable for complex project analysis
+  - qwen: Alternative to Gemini with similar capabilities
+
+## 3. Agent-Driven Execution Flow
+
+The command fully delegates to **universal-executor agent**, which autonomously:
+
+1. **Analyzes Project Structure**: Executes `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to understand architecture
+2. **Loads Documentation**: Reads CLAUDE.md, README.md and other key docs
+3. **Extracts Keywords**: Derives core keywords from task description
+4. **Discovers Files**: Uses MCP code-index or rg/find to locate relevant files
+5. **CLI Deep Analysis**: Executes Gemini/Qwen CLI for deep context analysis
+6. **Generates Content Package**: Returns structured JSON core content package
+
+## 4. Core Content Package Structure
+
+**Output Format** - Loaded into main thread memory for subsequent use:
+
+```json
+{
+  "task_context": "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能",
+  "keywords": ["前端", "用户", "认证", "auth", "login"],
+  "project_summary": {
+    "architecture": "TypeScript + React frontend with Vite build system",
+    "tech_stack": ["React", "TypeScript", "Vite", "TailwindCSS"],
+    "key_patterns": [
+      "State management via Context API",
+      "Functional components with Hooks pattern",
+      "API calls encapsulated in custom hooks"
+    ]
+  },
+  "relevant_files": [
+    {
+      "path": "src/components/Auth/LoginForm.tsx",
+      "relevance": "Existing login form component",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "src/contexts/AuthContext.tsx",
+      "relevance": "Authentication state management context",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+      "relevance": "Project development standards",
+      "priority": "high"
+    }
+  ],
+  "integration_points": [
+    "Must integrate with existing AuthContext",
+    "Follow component organization pattern: src/components/[Feature]/",
+    "API calls should use src/hooks/useApi.ts wrapper"
+  ],
+  "constraints": [
+    "Maintain backward compatibility",
+    "Follow TypeScript strict mode",
+    "Use existing UI component library"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## 5. Agent Invocation
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="universal-executor",
+  description="Load project memory: ${task_description}",
+  prompt=`
+## Mission: Load Project Memory Context
+
+**Task**: Load project memory context for: "${task_description}"
+**Mode**: analysis
+**Tool Preference**: ${tool || 'gemini'}
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### Step 1: Foundation Analysis
+
+1. **Project Structure**
+   \`\`\`bash
+   bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+   \`\`\`
+
+2. **Core Documentation**
+   \`\`\`javascript
+   Read(CLAUDE.md)
+   Read(README.md)
+   \`\`\`
+
+### Step 2: Keyword Extraction & File Discovery
+
+1. Extract core keywords from task description
+2. Discover relevant files using ripgrep and find:
+   \`\`\`bash
+   # Find files by name
+   find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f
+
+   # Search content with ripgrep
+   rg "{keyword}" --type ts --type md -C 2
+   rg -l "{keyword}" --type ts --type md  # List files only
+   \`\`\`
+
+### Step 3: Deep Analysis via CLI
+
+Execute Gemini/Qwen CLI for deep analysis (saves main thread tokens):
+
+\`\`\`bash
+cd . && ${tool} -p "
+PURPOSE: Extract project core context for task: ${task_description}
+TASK: Analyze project architecture, tech stack, key patterns, relevant files
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md,README.md @${discovered_files}
+EXPECTED: Structured project summary and integration point analysis
+RULES:
+- Focus on task-relevant core information
+- Identify key architecture patterns and technical constraints
+- Extract integration points and development standards
+- Output concise, structured format
+"
+\`\`\`
+
+### Step 4: Generate Core Content Package
+
+Generate structured JSON content package (format shown above)
+
+**Required Fields**:
+- task_context: Original task description
+- keywords: Extracted keyword array
+- project_summary: Architecture, tech stack, key patterns
+- relevant_files: File list with path, relevance, priority
+- integration_points: Integration guidance
+- constraints: Development constraints
+
+### Step 5: Return Content Package
+
+Return JSON content package as final output for main thread to load into memory.
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before returning:
+- [ ] Valid JSON format
+- [ ] All required fields complete
+- [ ] relevant_files contains 3-10 files minimum
+- [ ] project_summary accurately reflects architecture
+- [ ] integration_points clearly specify integration paths
+- [ ] keywords accurately extracted (3-8 keywords)
+- [ ] Content concise, avoiding redundancy (< 5KB total)
+
+  `
+)
+```
+
+## 6. Usage Examples
+
+### Example 1: Load Context for New Feature
+
+```bash
+/memory:load "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
+```
+
+**Agent Execution**:
+1. Analyzes project structure (`get_modules_by_depth.sh`)
+2. Reads CLAUDE.md, README.md
+3. Extracts keywords: ["前端", "用户", "认证", "auth"]
+4. Uses MCP to search relevant files
+5. Executes Gemini CLI for deep analysis
+6. Returns core content package
+
+**Returned Package** (loaded into memory):
+```json
+{
+  "task_context": "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能",
+  "keywords": ["前端", "认证", "auth", "login"],
+  "project_summary": { ... },
+  "relevant_files": [ ... ],
+  "integration_points": [ ... ],
+  "constraints": [ ... ]
+}
+```
+
+### Example 2: Using Qwen Tool
+
+```bash
+/memory:load --tool qwen -p "重构支付模块API"
+```
+
+Agent uses Qwen CLI for analysis, returns same structured package.
+
+### Example 3: Bug Fix Context
+
+```bash
+/memory:load "修复登录验证错误"
+```
+
+Returns core context related to login validation, including test files and validation logic.
+
+### Memory Persistence
+
+- **Session-Scoped**: Content package valid for current session
+- **Subsequent Reference**: All subsequent agents/commands can access
+- **Reload Required**: New sessions need to re-execute /memory:load
+
+## 8. Notes
+
+- **Read-Only**: Does not modify any code, pure analysis
+- **Token Optimization**: CLI analysis executed within agent, saves main thread tokens
+- **Memory Loading**: Returned JSON loaded directly into main thread memory
+- **Subsequent Use**: Other commands/agents can reference this package for development
+- **Session-Level**: Content package valid for current session

.claude/commands/memory/skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,534 @@
+---
+name: skill-memory
+description: 4-phase autonomous orchestrator: check docs → /memory:docs planning → /workflow:execute → generate SKILL.md with progressive loading index (skips phases 2-3 if docs exist)
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--regenerate] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Memory SKILL Package Generator
+
+## Orchestrator Role
+
+**Pure Orchestrator**: Execute documentation generation workflow, then generate SKILL.md index. Does NOT create task JSON files.
+
+**Auto-Continue Workflow**: This command runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes and automatically triggers the next phase without user interaction.
+
+**Execution Paths**:
+- **Full Path**: All 4 phases (no existing docs OR `--regenerate` specified)
+- **Skip Path**: Phase 1 → Phase 4 (existing docs found AND no `--regenerate` flag)
+- **Phase 4 Always Executes**: SKILL.md index is never skipped, always generated or updated
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+2. **No Task JSON**: This command does not create task JSON files - delegates to /memory:docs
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command output (session_id, task_count, file paths)
+4. **Auto-Continue**: After completing each phase, update TodoWrite and immediately execute next phase
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after EVERY phase completion before starting next phase
+6. **Direct Generation**: Phase 4 directly generates SKILL.md using Write tool
+7. **No Manual Steps**: User should never be prompted for decisions between phases
+
+---
+
+## 4-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Prepare Arguments
+
+**Goal**: Parse command arguments and check existing documentation
+
+**Step 1: Get Target Path and Project Name**
+```bash
+# Get current directory (or use provided path)
+bash(pwd)
+
+# Get project name from directory
+bash(basename "$(pwd)")
+
+# Get project root
+bash(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `target_path`: `/d/my_project`
+- `project_name`: `my_project`
+- `project_root`: `/d/my_project`
+
+**Step 2: Set Default Parameters**
+```bash
+# Default values (use these unless user specifies otherwise):
+# - tool: "gemini"
+# - mode: "full"
+# - regenerate: false (no --regenerate flag)
+# - cli_execute: false (no --cli-execute flag)
+```
+
+**Step 3: Check Existing Documentation**
+```bash
+# Check if docs directory exists
+bash(test -d .workflow/docs/my_project && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+
+# Count existing documentation files
+bash(find .workflow/docs/my_project -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `docs_exists`: `exists` or `not_exists`
+- `existing_docs`: `5` (or `0` if no docs)
+
+**Step 4: Determine Execution Path**
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+if (existing_docs > 0 && !regenerate_flag) {
+  // Documentation exists and no regenerate flag
+  SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true
+  message = "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+} else if (regenerate_flag) {
+  // Force regeneration: delete existing docs
+  bash(rm -rf .workflow/docs/my_project 2>/dev/null || true)
+  SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false
+  message = "Regenerating documentation from scratch."
+} else {
+  // No existing docs
+  SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false
+  message = "No existing documentation found, generating new documentation."
+}
+```
+
+**Summary Variables**:
+- `PROJECT_NAME`: `my_project`
+- `TARGET_PATH`: `/d/my_project`
+- `DOCS_PATH`: `.workflow/docs/my_project`
+- `TOOL`: `gemini` (default) or user-specified
+- `MODE`: `full` (default) or user-specified
+- `CLI_EXECUTE`: `false` (default) or `true` if --cli-execute flag
+- `REGENERATE`: `false` (default) or `true` if --regenerate flag
+- `EXISTING_DOCS`: Count of existing documentation files
+- `SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION`: `true` if skipping Phase 2/3, `false` otherwise
+
+**Completion & TodoWrite**:
+- If `SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true`: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2&3 completed (skipped), phase 4 in_progress
+- If `SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false`: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Next Action**:
+- If skipping: Display skip message → Jump to Phase 4 (SKILL.md generation)
+- If not skipping: Display preparation results → Continue to Phase 2 (documentation planning)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Call /memory:docs
+
+**Skip Condition**: This phase is **skipped if SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true** (documentation already exists without --regenerate flag)
+
+**Goal**: Trigger documentation generation workflow
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/memory:docs [targetPath] --tool [tool] --mode [mode] [--cli-execute]")
+```
+
+**Example**:
+```bash
+/memory:docs /d/my_app --tool gemini --mode full
+/memory:docs /d/my_app --tool gemini --mode full --cli-execute
+```
+
+**Note**: The `--regenerate` flag is handled in Phase 1 by deleting existing documentation. This command always calls `/memory:docs` without the regenerate flag, relying on docs.md's built-in update detection.
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract session ID: `WFS-docs-[timestamp]` (store as `docsSessionId`)
+- Extract task count (store as `taskCount`)
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- `/memory:docs` command executed successfully
+- Session ID extracted and stored
+- Task count retrieved
+- Task files created in `.workflow/[docsSessionId]/.task/`
+- workflow-session.json exists
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+**Next Action**: Display docs planning results (session ID, task count) → Auto-continue to Phase 3
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Execute Documentation Generation
+
+**Skip Condition**: This phase is **skipped if SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true** (documentation already exists without --regenerate flag)
+
+**Goal**: Execute documentation generation tasks
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:execute")
+```
+
+**Note**: `/workflow:execute` automatically discovers active session from Phase 2
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- `/workflow:execute` command executed successfully
+- Documentation files generated in `.workflow/docs/[projectName]/`
+- All tasks marked as completed in session
+- At minimum: module documentation files exist (API.md and/or README.md)
+- For full mode: Project README, ARCHITECTURE, EXAMPLES files generated
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+
+**Next Action**: Display execution results (file count, module count) → Auto-continue to Phase 4
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Generate SKILL.md Index
+
+**Note**: This phase is **NEVER skipped** - it always executes to generate or update the SKILL index.
+
+**Step 1: Read Key Files** (Use Read tool)
+- `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/README.md` (required)
+- `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md` (optional)
+
+**Step 2: Discover Structure**
+```bash
+bash(find .workflow/docs/{project_name} -name "*.md" | sed 's|.workflow/docs/{project_name}/||' | awk -F'/' '{if(NF>=2) print $1"/"$2}' | sort -u)
+```
+
+**Step 3: Generate Intelligent Description**
+
+Extract from README + structure: Function (capabilities), Modules (names), Keywords (API/CLI/auth/etc.)
+
+**Format**: `{Project} {core capabilities} (located at {project_path}). Load this SKILL when analyzing, modifying, or learning about {domain_description} or files under this path, especially when no relevant context exists in memory.`
+
+**Key Elements**:
+- **Path Reference**: Use `TARGET_PATH` from Phase 1 for precise location identification
+- **Domain Description**: Extract human-readable domain/feature area from README (e.g., "workflow management", "thermal modeling")
+- **Trigger Optimization**: Include project path, emphasize "especially when no relevant context exists in memory"
+- **Action Coverage**: analyzing (分析), modifying (修改), learning (了解)
+
+**Example**: "Workflow orchestration system with CLI tools and documentation generation (located at /d/Claude_dms3). Load this SKILL when analyzing, modifying, or learning about workflow management or files under this path, especially when no relevant context exists in memory."
+
+**Step 4: Write SKILL.md** (Use Write tool)
+```bash
+bash(mkdir -p .claude/skills/{project_name})
+```
+
+`.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`:
+```yaml
+---
+name: {project_name}
+description: {intelligent description from Step 3}
+version: 1.0.0
+---
+# {Project Name} SKILL Package
+
+## Documentation: `../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/`
+
+## Progressive Loading
+### Level 0: Quick Start (~2K)
+- [README](../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/README.md)
+### Level 1: Core Modules (~8K)
+{Module READMEs}
+### Level 2: Complete (~25K)
+All modules + [Architecture](../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md)
+### Level 3: Deep Dive (~40K)
+Everything + [Examples](../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/EXAMPLES.md)
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- SKILL.md file created at `.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`
+- Intelligent description generated from documentation
+- Progressive loading levels (0-3) properly structured
+- Module index includes all documented modules
+- All file references use relative paths
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+
+**Final Action**: Report completion summary to user
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+SKILL Package Generation Complete
+
+Project: {project_name}
+Documentation: .workflow/docs/{project_name}/ ({doc_count} files)
+SKILL Index: .claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md
+
+Generated:
+- {task_count} documentation tasks completed
+- SKILL.md with progressive loading (4 levels)
+- Module index with {module_count} modules
+
+Usage:
+- Load Level 0: Quick project overview (~2K tokens)
+- Load Level 1: Core modules (~8K tokens)
+- Load Level 2: Complete docs (~25K tokens)
+- Load Level 3: Everything (~40K tokens)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Critical Rules
+
+1. **No User Prompts Between Phases**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
+2. **Immediate Phase Transition**: After TodoWrite update, immediately execute next phase command
+3. **Status-Driven Execution**: Check TodoList status after each phase:
+   - If next task is "pending" → Mark it "in_progress" and execute
+   - If all tasks are "completed" → Report final summary
+4. **Phase Completion Pattern**:
+   ```
+   Phase N completes → Update TodoWrite (N=completed, N+1=in_progress) → Execute Phase N+1
+   ```
+
+### TodoWrite Patterns
+
+#### Initialization (Before Phase 1)
+
+**FIRST ACTION**: Create TodoList with all 4 phases
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+```
+
+**SECOND ACTION**: Execute Phase 1 immediately
+
+#### Full Path (SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false)
+
+**After Phase 1**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Auto-continue to Phase 2
+```
+
+**After Phase 2**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Auto-continue to Phase 3
+```
+
+**After Phase 3**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Auto-continue to Phase 4
+```
+
+**After Phase 4**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Report completion summary to user
+```
+
+#### Skip Path (SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true)
+
+**After Phase 1** (detects existing docs, skips Phase 2 & 3):
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Display skip message: "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+// Jump directly to Phase 4
+```
+
+**After Phase 4**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Report completion summary to user
+```
+
+### Execution Flow Diagrams
+
+#### Full Path Flow
+```
+User triggers command
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Initialize 4 phases (Phase 1 = in_progress)
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 1: Parse arguments
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 1 = completed, Phase 2 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 2: Call /memory:docs
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 2 = completed, Phase 3 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 3: Call /workflow:execute
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 3 = completed, Phase 4 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 4: Generate SKILL.md
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 4 = completed
+  ↓
+[Report] Display completion summary
+```
+
+#### Skip Path Flow
+```
+User triggers command
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Initialize 4 phases (Phase 1 = in_progress)
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 1: Parse arguments, detect existing docs
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 1 = completed, Phase 2&3 = completed (skipped), Phase 4 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Display] Skip message: "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3"
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 4: Generate SKILL.md (always runs)
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 4 = completed
+  ↓
+[Report] Display completion summary
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+- If any phase fails, mark it as "in_progress" (not completed)
+- Report error details to user
+- Do NOT auto-continue to next phase on failure
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--regenerate] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]
+```
+
+- **path**: Target directory (default: current directory)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool for documentation (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate all documentation
+  - When enabled: Deletes existing `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/` before regeneration
+  - Ensures fresh documentation from source code
+- **--mode**: Documentation mode (default: full)
+  - `full`: Complete docs (modules + README + ARCHITECTURE + EXAMPLES)
+  - `partial`: Module docs only
+- **--cli-execute**: Enable CLI-based documentation generation (optional)
+  - When enabled: CLI generates docs directly in implementation_approach
+  - When disabled (default): Agent generates documentation content
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Generate SKILL Package (Default)
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects current directory, checks existing docs
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs . --tool gemini --mode full` (Agent Mode)
+3. Phase 3: Executes documentation generation via `/workflow:execute`
+4. Phase 4: Generates SKILL.md at `.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`
+
+### Example 2: Regenerate with Qwen
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory /d/my_app --tool qwen --regenerate
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Parses target path, detects regenerate flag, deletes existing docs
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs /d/my_app --tool qwen --mode full`
+3. Phase 3: Executes documentation regeneration
+4. Phase 4: Generates updated SKILL.md
+
+### Example 3: Partial Mode (Modules Only)
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory --mode partial
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects partial mode
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs . --tool gemini --mode partial` (Agent Mode)
+3. Phase 3: Executes module documentation only
+4. Phase 4: Generates SKILL.md with module-only index
+
+### Example 4: CLI Execute Mode
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory --cli-execute
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects CLI execute mode
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs . --tool gemini --mode full --cli-execute` (CLI Mode)
+3. Phase 3: Executes CLI-based documentation generation
+4. Phase 4: Generates SKILL.md at `.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`
+
+### Example 5: Skip Path (Existing Docs)
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory
+```
+
+**Scenario**: Documentation already exists in `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/`
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects existing docs (5 files), sets SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true
+2. Display: "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+3. Phase 4: Generates or updates SKILL.md index only (~5-10x faster)
+
+---
+
+## Benefits
+
+- **Pure Orchestrator**: No task JSON generation, delegates to /memory:docs
+- **Auto-Continue**: Autonomous 4-phase execution without user interaction
+- **Intelligent Skip**: Detects existing docs and skips regeneration for fast SKILL updates
+- **Always Fresh Index**: Phase 4 always executes to ensure SKILL.md stays synchronized
+- **Simplified**: ~70% less code than previous version
+- **Maintainable**: Changes to /memory:docs automatically apply
+- **Direct Generation**: Phase 4 directly writes SKILL.md
+- **Flexible**: Supports all /memory:docs options (tool, mode, cli-execute)
+
+## Architecture
+
+```
+skill-memory (orchestrator)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Prepare (bash commands, skip decision)
+  ├─ Phase 2: /memory:docs (task planning, skippable)
+  ├─ Phase 3: /workflow:execute (task execution, skippable)
+  └─ Phase 4: Write SKILL.md (direct file generation, always runs)
+
+No task JSON created by this command
+All documentation tasks managed by /memory:docs
+Smart skip logic: 5-10x faster when docs exist
+```

.claude/commands/memory/style-skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,396 @@
+---
+name: style-skill-memory
+description: Generate SKILL memory package from style reference for easy loading and consistent design system usage
+argument-hint: "[package-name] [--regenerate]"
+allowed-tools: Bash,Read,Write,TodoWrite
+auto-continue: true
+---
+
+# Memory: Style SKILL Memory Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Purpose**: Convert style reference package into SKILL memory for easy loading and context management.
+
+**Input**: Style reference package at `.workflow/reference_style/{package-name}/`
+
+**Output**: SKILL memory index at `.claude/skills/style-{package-name}/SKILL.md`
+
+**Use Case**: Load design system context when working with UI components, analyzing design patterns, or implementing style guidelines.
+
+**Key Features**:
+- Extracts primary design references (colors, typography, spacing, etc.)
+- Provides dynamic adjustment guidelines for design tokens
+- Includes prerequisites and tooling requirements (browsers, PostCSS, dark mode)
+- Progressive loading structure for efficient token usage
+- Complete implementation examples with React components
+- Interactive preview showcase
+
+---
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+/memory:style-skill-memory [package-name] [--regenerate]
+
+# Arguments
+package-name    Style reference package name (required)
+--regenerate    Force regenerate SKILL.md even if it exists (optional)
+```
+
+### Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Generate SKILL memory for package
+/memory:style-skill-memory main-app-style-v1
+
+# Regenerate SKILL memory
+/memory:style-skill-memory main-app-style-v1 --regenerate
+
+# Package name from current directory or default
+/memory:style-skill-memory
+```
+
+### Key Variables
+
+**Input Variables**:
+- `PACKAGE_NAME`: Style reference package name
+- `PACKAGE_DIR`: `.workflow/reference_style/${package_name}`
+- `SKILL_DIR`: `.claude/skills/style-${package_name}`
+- `REGENERATE`: `true` if --regenerate flag, `false` otherwise
+
+**Data Sources** (Phase 2):
+- `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA`: Complete design-tokens.json content (from Read)
+- `LAYOUT_TEMPLATES_DATA`: Complete layout-templates.json content (from Read)
+- `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA`: Complete animation-tokens.json content (from Read, if exists)
+
+**Metadata** (Phase 2):
+- `COMPONENT_COUNT`: Total components
+- `UNIVERSAL_COUNT`: Universal components count
+- `SPECIALIZED_COUNT`: Specialized components count
+- `UNIVERSAL_COMPONENTS`: Universal component names (first 5)
+- `HAS_ANIMATIONS`: Whether animation-tokens.json exists
+
+**Analysis Output** (`DESIGN_ANALYSIS` - Phase 2):
+- `has_colors`: Colors exist
+- `color_semantic`: Has semantic naming (primary/secondary/accent)
+- `uses_oklch`: Uses modern color spaces (oklch, lab, etc.)
+- `has_dark_mode`: Has separate light/dark mode color tokens
+- `spacing_pattern`: Pattern type ("linear", "geometric", "custom")
+- `spacing_scale`: Actual scale values (e.g., [4, 8, 16, 32, 64])
+- `has_typography`: Typography system exists
+- `typography_hierarchy`: Has size scale for hierarchy
+- `uses_calc`: Uses calc() expressions in token values
+- `has_radius`: Border radius exists
+- `radius_style`: Style characteristic ("sharp" <4px, "moderate" 4-8px, "rounded" >8px)
+- `has_shadows`: Shadow system exists
+- `shadow_pattern`: Elevation naming pattern
+- `has_animations`: Animation tokens exist
+- `animation_range`: Duration range (fast to slow)
+- `easing_variety`: Types of easing functions
+
+### Common Errors
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Package not found | Invalid package name or doesn't exist | Run `/workflow:ui-design:codify-style` first |
+| SKILL already exists | SKILL.md already generated | Use `--regenerate` flag |
+| Missing layout-templates.json | Incomplete package | Verify package integrity, re-run codify-style |
+| Invalid JSON format | Corrupted package files | Regenerate package with codify-style |
+
+---
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Phase 1: Validate Package
+
+**TodoWrite** (First Action):
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "content": "Validate package exists and check SKILL status",
+    "activeForm": "Validating package and SKILL status",
+    "status": "in_progress"
+  },
+  {
+    "content": "Read package data and analyze design system",
+    "activeForm": "Reading package data and analyzing design system",
+    "status": "pending"
+  },
+  {
+    "content": "Generate SKILL.md with design principles and token values",
+    "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md with design principles and token values",
+    "status": "pending"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+**Step 1: Parse Package Name**
+
+```bash
+# Get package name from argument or auto-detect
+bash(echo "${package_name}" || basename "$(pwd)" | sed 's/^style-//')
+```
+
+**Step 2: Validate Package Exists**
+
+```bash
+bash(test -d .workflow/reference_style/${package_name} && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+**Error Handling**:
+```javascript
+if (package_not_exists) {
+  error("ERROR: Style reference package not found: ${package_name}")
+  error("HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:codify-style' first to create package")
+  error("Available packages:")
+  bash(ls -1 .workflow/reference_style/ 2>/dev/null || echo "  (none)")
+  exit(1)
+}
+```
+
+**Step 3: Check SKILL Already Exists**
+
+```bash
+bash(test -f .claude/skills/style-${package_name}/SKILL.md && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+if (skill_exists && !regenerate_flag) {
+  echo("SKILL memory already exists for: ${package_name}")
+  echo("Use --regenerate to force regeneration")
+  exit(0)
+}
+
+if (regenerate_flag && skill_exists) {
+  echo("Regenerating SKILL memory for: ${package_name}")
+}
+```
+
+**TodoWrite Update**: Mark "Validate" as completed, "Read package data" as in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Read Package Data & Analyze Design System
+
+**Step 1: Read All JSON Files**
+
+```bash
+# Read layout templates
+Read(file_path=".workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/layout-templates.json")
+
+# Read design tokens
+Read(file_path=".workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/design-tokens.json")
+
+# Read animation tokens (if exists)
+bash(test -f .workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/animation-tokens.json && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+Read(file_path=".workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/animation-tokens.json")  # if exists
+```
+
+**Step 2: Extract Metadata for Description**
+
+```bash
+# Count components and classify by type
+bash(jq '.layout_templates | length' layout-templates.json)
+bash(jq '[.layout_templates[] | select(.component_type == "universal")] | length' layout-templates.json)
+bash(jq '[.layout_templates[] | select(.component_type == "specialized")] | length' layout-templates.json)
+bash(jq -r '.layout_templates | to_entries[] | select(.value.component_type == "universal") | .key' layout-templates.json | head -5)
+```
+
+Store results in metadata variables (see [Key Variables](#key-variables))
+
+**Step 3: Analyze Design System for Dynamic Principles**
+
+Analyze design-tokens.json to extract characteristics and patterns:
+
+```bash
+# Color system characteristics
+bash(jq '.colors | keys' design-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.colors | to_entries[0:2] | map(.value)' design-tokens.json)
+# Check for modern color spaces
+bash(jq '.colors | to_entries[] | .value | test("oklch|lab|lch")' design-tokens.json)
+# Check for dark mode variants
+bash(jq '.colors | keys | map(select(contains("dark") or contains("light")))' design-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_colors, color_semantic, uses_oklch, has_dark_mode
+
+# Spacing pattern detection
+bash(jq '.spacing | to_entries | map(.value) | map(gsub("[^0-9.]"; "") | tonumber)' design-tokens.json)
+# Analyze pattern: linear (4-8-12-16) vs geometric (4-8-16-32) vs custom
+# → Store: spacing_pattern, spacing_scale
+
+# Typography characteristics
+bash(jq '.typography | keys | map(select(contains("family") or contains("weight")))' design-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.typography | to_entries | map(select(.key | contains("size"))) | .[].value' design-tokens.json)
+# Check for calc() usage
+bash(jq '. | tostring | test("calc\\(")' design-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_typography, typography_hierarchy, uses_calc
+
+# Border radius style
+bash(jq '.border_radius | to_entries | map(.value)' design-tokens.json)
+# Check range: small (sharp <4px) vs moderate (4-8px) vs large (rounded >8px)
+# → Store: has_radius, radius_style
+
+# Shadow characteristics
+bash(jq '.shadows | keys' design-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.shadows | to_entries[0].value' design-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_shadows, shadow_pattern
+
+# Animations (if available)
+bash(jq '.duration | to_entries | map(.value)' animation-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.easing | keys' animation-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_animations, animation_range, easing_variety
+```
+
+Store analysis results in `DESIGN_ANALYSIS` (see [Key Variables](#key-variables))
+
+**Note**: Analysis focuses on characteristics and patterns, not counts. Include technical feature detection (oklch, calc, dark mode) for Prerequisites section.
+
+**TodoWrite Update**: Mark "Read package data" as completed, "Generate SKILL.md" as in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Generate SKILL.md
+
+**Step 1: Create SKILL Directory**
+
+```bash
+bash(mkdir -p .claude/skills/style-${package_name})
+```
+
+**Step 2: Generate Intelligent Description**
+
+**Format**:
+```
+{package_name} project-independent design system with {universal_count} universal layout templates and interactive preview (located at .workflow/reference_style/{package_name}). Load when working with reusable UI components, design tokens, layout patterns, or implementing visual consistency. Excludes {specialized_count} project-specific components.
+```
+
+**Step 3: Load and Process SKILL.md Template**
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - Execute First**:
+```bash
+bash(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/memory/style-skill-memory/skill-md-template.md)
+```
+
+**Template Processing**:
+1. **Replace variables**: Substitute all `{variable}` placeholders with actual values from Phase 2
+2. **Generate dynamic sections**:
+   - **Prerequisites & Tooling**: Generate based on `DESIGN_ANALYSIS` technical features (oklch, calc, dark mode)
+   - **Design Principles**: Generate based on `DESIGN_ANALYSIS` characteristics
+   - **Complete Implementation Example**: Include React component example with token adaptation
+   - **Design Token Values**: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA`, `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA` and display all key-value pairs with DEFAULT annotations
+3. **Write to file**: Use Write tool to save to `.claude/skills/style-{package_name}/SKILL.md`
+
+**Variable Replacement Map**:
+- `{package_name}` → PACKAGE_NAME
+- `{intelligent_description}` → Generated description from Step 2
+- `{component_count}` → COMPONENT_COUNT
+- `{universal_count}` → UNIVERSAL_COUNT
+- `{specialized_count}` → SPECIALIZED_COUNT
+- `{universal_components_list}` → UNIVERSAL_COMPONENTS (comma-separated)
+- `{has_animations}` → HAS_ANIMATIONS
+
+**Dynamic Content Generation**:
+
+See template file for complete structure. Key dynamic sections:
+
+1. **Prerequisites & Tooling** (based on DESIGN_ANALYSIS technical features):
+   - IF uses_oklch → Include PostCSS plugin requirement (`postcss-oklab-function`)
+   - IF uses_calc → Include preprocessor requirement for calc() expressions
+   - IF has_dark_mode → Include dark mode implementation mechanism (class or media query)
+   - ALWAYS include browser support, jq installation, and local server setup
+
+2. **Design Principles** (based on DESIGN_ANALYSIS):
+   - IF has_colors → Include "Color System" principle with semantic pattern
+   - IF spacing_pattern detected → Include "Spatial Rhythm" with unified scale description (actual token values)
+   - IF has_typography_hierarchy → Include "Typographic System" with scale examples
+   - IF has_radius → Include "Shape Language" with style characteristic
+   - IF has_shadows → Include "Depth & Elevation" with elevation pattern
+   - IF has_animations → Include "Motion & Timing" with duration range
+   - ALWAYS include "Accessibility First" principle
+
+3. **Design Token Values** (iterate from read data):
+   - Colors: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.colors`
+   - Typography: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.typography`
+   - Spacing: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.spacing`
+   - Border Radius: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.border_radius` with calc() explanations
+   - Shadows: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.shadows` with DEFAULT token annotations
+   - Animations (if available): Iterate `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA.duration` and `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA.easing`
+
+**Step 4: Verify SKILL.md Created**
+
+```bash
+bash(test -f .claude/skills/style-${package_name}/SKILL.md && echo "success" || echo "failed")
+```
+
+**TodoWrite Update**: Mark all todos as completed
+
+---
+
+### Completion Message
+
+Display a simple completion message with key information:
+
+```
+✅ SKILL memory generated for style package: {package_name}
+
+📁 Location: .claude/skills/style-{package_name}/SKILL.md
+
+📊 Package Summary:
+   - {component_count} components ({universal_count} universal, {specialized_count} specialized)
+   - Design tokens: colors, typography, spacing, shadows{animations_note}
+
+💡 Usage: /memory:load-skill-memory style-{package_name} "your task description"
+```
+
+Variables: `{package_name}`, `{component_count}`, `{universal_count}`, `{specialized_count}`, `{animations_note}` (", animations" if exists)
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Critical Rules
+
+1. **Check Before Generate**: Verify package exists before attempting SKILL generation
+2. **Respect Existing SKILL**: Don't overwrite unless --regenerate flag provided
+3. **Load Templates via cat**: Use `cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/memory/style-skill-memory/{template}` to load templates
+4. **Variable Substitution**: Replace all `{variable}` placeholders with actual values
+5. **Technical Feature Detection**: Analyze tokens for modern features (oklch, calc, dark mode) and generate appropriate Prerequisites section
+6. **Dynamic Content Generation**: Generate sections based on DESIGN_ANALYSIS characteristics
+7. **Unified Spacing Scale**: Use actual token values as primary scale reference, avoid contradictory pattern descriptions
+8. **Direct Iteration**: Iterate data structures (DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA, etc.) for token values
+9. **Annotate Special Tokens**: Add comments for DEFAULT tokens and calc() expressions
+10. **Embed jq Commands**: Include bash/jq commands in SKILL.md for dynamic loading
+11. **Progressive Loading**: Include all 3 levels (0-2) with specific jq commands
+12. **Complete Examples**: Include end-to-end implementation examples (React components)
+13. **Intelligent Description**: Extract component count and key features from metadata
+14. **Emphasize Flexibility**: Strongly warn against rigid copying - values are references for creative adaptation
+
+### Template Files Location
+
+
+```
+Phase 1: Validate
+  ├─ Parse package_name
+  ├─ Check PACKAGE_DIR exists
+  └─ Check SKILL_DIR exists (skip if exists and no --regenerate)
+
+Phase 2: Read & Analyze
+  ├─ Read design-tokens.json → DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA
+  ├─ Read layout-templates.json → LAYOUT_TEMPLATES_DATA
+  ├─ Read animation-tokens.json → ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA (if exists)
+  ├─ Extract Metadata → COMPONENT_COUNT, UNIVERSAL_COUNT, etc.
+  └─ Analyze Design System → DESIGN_ANALYSIS (characteristics)
+
+Phase 3: Generate
+  ├─ Create SKILL directory
+  ├─ Generate intelligent description
+  ├─ Load SKILL.md template (cat command)
+  ├─ Replace variables and generate dynamic content
+  ├─ Write SKILL.md
+  ├─ Verify creation
+  ├─ Load completion message template (cat command)
+  └─ Display completion message
+```

.claude/commands/memory/tech-research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+---
+name: tech-research
+description: 3-phase orchestrator: extract tech stack from session/name → delegate to agent for Exa research and module generation → generate SKILL.md index (skips phase 2 if exists)
+argument-hint: "[session-id | tech-stack-name] [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Tech Stack Research SKILL Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Pure Orchestrator with Agent Delegation**: Prepares context paths and delegates ALL work to agent. Agent produces files directly.
+
+**Auto-Continue Workflow**: Runs fully autonomously once triggered. Each phase completes and automatically triggers the next phase.
+
+**Execution Paths**:
+- **Full Path**: All 3 phases (no existing SKILL OR `--regenerate` specified)
+- **Skip Path**: Phase 1 → Phase 3 (existing SKILL found AND no `--regenerate` flag)
+- **Phase 3 Always Executes**: SKILL index is always generated or updated
+
+**Agent Responsibility**:
+- Agent does ALL the work: context reading, Exa research, content synthesis, file writing
+- Orchestrator only provides context paths and waits for completion
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+2. **Context Path Delegation**: Pass session directory or tech stack name to agent, let agent do discovery
+3. **Agent Produces Files**: Agent directly writes all module files, orchestrator does NOT parse agent output
+4. **Auto-Continue**: After completing each phase, update TodoWrite and immediately execute next phase
+5. **No User Prompts**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after EVERY phase completion before starting next phase
+7. **Lightweight Index**: Phase 3 only generates SKILL.md index by reading existing files
+
+---
+
+## 3-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Prepare Context Paths
+
+**Goal**: Detect input mode, prepare context paths for agent, check existing SKILL
+
+**Input Mode Detection**:
+```bash
+# Get input parameter
+input="$1"
+
+# Detect mode
+if [[ "$input" == WFS-* ]]; then
+  MODE="session"
+  SESSION_ID="$input"
+  CONTEXT_PATH=".workflow/${SESSION_ID}"
+else
+  MODE="direct"
+  TECH_STACK_NAME="$input"
+  CONTEXT_PATH="$input"  # Pass tech stack name as context
+fi
+```
+
+**Check Existing SKILL**:
+```bash
+# For session mode, peek at session to get tech stack name
+if [[ "$MODE" == "session" ]]; then
+  bash(test -f ".workflow/${SESSION_ID}/workflow-session.json")
+  Read(.workflow/${SESSION_ID}/workflow-session.json)
+  # Extract tech_stack_name (minimal extraction)
+fi
+
+# Normalize and check
+normalized_name=$(echo "$TECH_STACK_NAME" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '-')
+bash(test -d ".claude/skills/${normalized_name}" && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+bash(find ".claude/skills/${normalized_name}" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Skip Decision**:
+```javascript
+if (existing_files > 0 && !regenerate_flag) {
+  SKIP_GENERATION = true
+  message = "Tech stack SKILL already exists, skipping Phase 2. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+} else if (regenerate_flag) {
+  bash(rm -rf ".claude/skills/${normalized_name}")
+  SKIP_GENERATION = false
+  message = "Regenerating tech stack SKILL from scratch."
+} else {
+  SKIP_GENERATION = false
+  message = "No existing SKILL found, generating new tech stack documentation."
+}
+```
+
+**Output Variables**:
+- `MODE`: `session` or `direct`
+- `SESSION_ID`: Session ID (if session mode)
+- `CONTEXT_PATH`: Path to session directory OR tech stack name
+- `TECH_STACK_NAME`: Extracted or provided tech stack name
+- `SKIP_GENERATION`: Boolean - whether to skip Phase 2
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+- If skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+- If not skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Produces All Files
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skipped if `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+
+**Goal**: Delegate EVERYTHING to agent - context reading, Exa research, content synthesis, and file writing
+
+**Agent Task Specification**:
+
+```
+Task(
+  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
+  description: "Generate tech stack SKILL: {CONTEXT_PATH}",
+  prompt: "
+Generate a complete tech stack SKILL package with Exa research.
+
+**Context Provided**:
+- Mode: {MODE}
+- Context Path: {CONTEXT_PATH}
+
+**Templates Available**:
+- Module Format: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-module-format.txt
+- SKILL Index: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-skill-index.txt
+
+**Your Responsibilities**:
+
+1. **Extract Tech Stack Information**:
+
+   IF MODE == 'session':
+     - Read `.workflow/{SESSION_ID}/workflow-session.json`
+     - Read `.workflow/{SESSION_ID}/.process/context-package.json`
+     - Extract tech_stack: {language, frameworks, libraries}
+     - Build tech stack name: \"{language}-{framework1}-{framework2}\"
+     - Example: \"typescript-react-nextjs\"
+
+   IF MODE == 'direct':
+     - Tech stack name = CONTEXT_PATH
+     - Parse composite: split by '-' delimiter
+     - Example: \"typescript-react-nextjs\" → [\"typescript\", \"react\", \"nextjs\"]
+
+2. **Execute Exa Research** (4-6 parallel queries):
+
+   Base Queries (always execute):
+   - mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{tech} core principles best practices 2025\", tokensNum: 8000)
+   - mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{tech} common patterns architecture examples\", tokensNum: 7000)
+   - mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query: \"{tech} configuration setup tooling 2025\", numResults: 5)
+   - mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{tech} testing strategies\", tokensNum: 5000)
+
+   Component Queries (if composite):
+   - For each additional component:
+     mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{main_tech} {component} integration\", tokensNum: 5000)
+
+3. **Read Module Format Template**:
+
+   Read template for structure guidance:
+   ```bash
+   Read(~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-module-format.txt)
+   ```
+
+4. **Synthesize Content into 6 Modules**:
+
+   Follow template structure from tech-module-format.txt:
+   - **principles.md** - Core concepts, philosophies (~3K tokens)
+   - **patterns.md** - Implementation patterns with code examples (~5K tokens)
+   - **practices.md** - Best practices, anti-patterns, pitfalls (~4K tokens)
+   - **testing.md** - Testing strategies, frameworks (~3K tokens)
+   - **config.md** - Setup, configuration, tooling (~3K tokens)
+   - **frameworks.md** - Framework integration (only if composite, ~4K tokens)
+
+   Each module follows template format:
+   - Frontmatter (YAML)
+   - Main sections with clear headings
+   - Code examples from Exa research
+   - Best practices sections
+   - References to Exa sources
+
+5. **Write Files Directly**:
+
+   ```javascript
+   // Create directory
+   bash(mkdir -p \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}\")
+
+   // Write each module file using Write tool
+   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/principles.md\", content: ... })
+   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/patterns.md\", content: ... })
+   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/practices.md\", content: ... })
+   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/testing.md\", content: ... })
+   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/config.md\", content: ... })
+   // Write frameworks.md only if composite
+
+   // Write metadata.json
+   Write({
+     file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/metadata.json\",
+     content: JSON.stringify({
+       tech_stack_name,
+       components,
+       is_composite,
+       generated_at: timestamp,
+       source: \"exa-research\",
+       research_summary: { total_queries, total_sources }
+     })
+   })
+   ```
+
+6. **Report Completion**:
+
+   Provide summary:
+   - Tech stack name
+   - Files created (count)
+   - Exa queries executed
+   - Sources consulted
+
+**CRITICAL**:
+- MUST read external template files before generating content (step 3 for modules, step 4 for index)
+- You have FULL autonomy - read files, execute Exa, synthesize content, write files
+- Do NOT return JSON or structured data - produce actual .md files
+- Handle errors gracefully (Exa failures, missing files, template read failures)
+- If tech stack cannot be determined, ask orchestrator to clarify
+  "
+)
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- Agent task executed successfully
+- 5-6 modular files written to `.claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/`
+- metadata.json written
+- Agent reports completion
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Generate SKILL.md Index
+
+**Note**: This phase **ALWAYS executes** - generates or updates the SKILL index.
+
+**Goal**: Read generated module files and create SKILL.md index with loading recommendations
+
+**Steps**:
+
+1. **Verify Generated Files**:
+   ```bash
+   bash(find ".claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}" -name "*.md" -type f | sort)
+   ```
+
+2. **Read metadata.json**:
+   ```javascript
+   Read(.claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/metadata.json)
+   // Extract: tech_stack_name, components, is_composite, research_summary
+   ```
+
+3. **Read Module Headers** (optional, first 20 lines):
+   ```javascript
+   Read(.claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/principles.md, limit: 20)
+   // Repeat for other modules
+   ```
+
+4. **Read SKILL Index Template**:
+
+   ```javascript
+   Read(~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-skill-index.txt)
+   ```
+
+5. **Generate SKILL.md Index**:
+
+   Follow template from tech-skill-index.txt with variable substitutions:
+   - `{TECH_STACK_NAME}`: From metadata.json
+   - `{MAIN_TECH}`: Primary technology
+   - `{ISO_TIMESTAMP}`: Current timestamp
+   - `{QUERY_COUNT}`: From research_summary
+   - `{SOURCE_COUNT}`: From research_summary
+   - Conditional sections for composite tech stacks
+
+   Template provides structure for:
+   - Frontmatter with metadata
+   - Overview and tech stack description
+   - Module organization (Core/Practical/Config sections)
+   - Loading recommendations (Quick/Implementation/Complete)
+   - Usage guidelines and auto-trigger keywords
+   - Research metadata and version history
+
+6. **Write SKILL.md**:
+   ```javascript
+   Write({
+     file_path: `.claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/SKILL.md`,
+     content: generatedIndexMarkdown
+   })
+   ```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- SKILL.md index written
+- All module files verified
+- Loading recommendations included
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
+
+**Final Report**:
+```
+Tech Stack SKILL Package Complete
+
+Tech Stack: {TECH_STACK_NAME}
+Location: .claude/skills/{TECH_STACK_NAME}/
+
+Files: SKILL.md + 5-6 modules + metadata.json
+Exa Research: {queries} queries, {sources} sources
+
+Usage: Skill(command: "{TECH_STACK_NAME}")
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### TodoWrite Patterns
+
+**Initialization** (Before Phase 1):
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Preparing context paths"},
+  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Agent producing files"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL index"}
+]})
+```
+
+**Full Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = false):
+```javascript
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "in_progress", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", ...}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 2
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 3
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", ...}
+]})
+```
+
+**Skip Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = true):
+```javascript
+// After Phase 1 (skip Phase 2)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "completed", ...},  // Skipped
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
+]})
+```
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+**Full Path**:
+```
+User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (prepare) → Phase 2 (agent writes files) → Phase 3 (write index) → Report
+```
+
+**Skip Path**:
+```
+User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (detect existing) → Phase 3 (update index) → Report
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase 1 Errors**:
+- Invalid session ID: Report error, verify session exists
+- Missing context-package: Warn, fall back to direct mode
+- No tech stack detected: Ask user to specify tech stack name
+
+**Phase 2 Errors (Agent)**:
+- Agent task fails: Retry once, report if fails again
+- Exa API failures: Agent handles internally with retries
+- Incomplete results: Warn user, proceed with partial data if minimum sections available
+
+**Phase 3 Errors**:
+- Write failures: Report which files failed
+- Missing files: Note in SKILL.md, suggest regeneration
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research [session-id | "tech-stack-name"] [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]
+```
+
+**Arguments**:
+- **session-id | tech-stack-name**: Input source (auto-detected by WFS- prefix)
+  - Session mode: `WFS-user-auth-v2` - Extract tech stack from workflow
+  - Direct mode: `"typescript"`, `"typescript-react-nextjs"` - User specifies
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate existing SKILL (deletes and recreates)
+- **--tool**: Reserved for future CLI integration (default: gemini)
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+**Generated File Structure** (for all examples):
+```
+.claude/skills/{tech-stack}/
+├── SKILL.md           # Index (Phase 3)
+├── principles.md      # Agent (Phase 2)
+├── patterns.md        # Agent
+├── practices.md       # Agent
+├── testing.md         # Agent
+├── config.md          # Agent
+├── frameworks.md      # Agent (if composite)
+└── metadata.json      # Agent
+```
+
+### Direct Mode - Single Stack
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "typescript"
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects direct mode, checks existing SKILL
+2. Phase 2: Agent executes 4 Exa queries, writes 5 modules
+3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index
+
+### Direct Mode - Composite Stack
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "typescript-react-nextjs"
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Decomposes into ["typescript", "react", "nextjs"]
+2. Phase 2: Agent executes 6 Exa queries (4 base + 2 components), writes 6 modules (adds frameworks.md)
+3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index with framework integration
+
+### Session Mode - Extract from Workflow
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research WFS-user-auth-20251104
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Reads session, extracts tech stack: `python-fastapi-sqlalchemy`
+2. Phase 2: Agent researches Python + FastAPI + SQLAlchemy, writes 6 modules
+3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index
+
+### Regenerate Existing
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "react" --regenerate
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Deletes existing SKILL due to --regenerate
+2. Phase 2: Agent executes fresh Exa research (latest 2025 practices)
+3. Phase 3: Generates updated SKILL.md
+
+### Skip Path - Fast Update
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "python"
+```
+
+**Scenario**: SKILL already exists with 7 files
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects existing SKILL, sets SKIP_GENERATION = true
+2. Phase 2: **SKIPPED**
+3. Phase 3: Updates SKILL.md index only (5-10x faster)
+
+

.claude/commands/memory/update-full.md

@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+---
+name: update-full
+description: Update all CLAUDE.md files using layer-based execution (Layer 3→1) with batched agents (4 modules/agent) and gemini→qwen→codex fallback, <20 modules uses direct parallel
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex] [--path <directory>]"
+---
+
+# Full Documentation Update (/memory:update-full)
+
+## Overview
+
+Orchestrates project-wide CLAUDE.md updates using batched agent execution with automatic tool fallback and 3-layer architecture support.
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`: Primary tool (default: gemini)
+- `--path <directory>`: Target specific directory (default: entire project)
+
+**Execution Flow**: Discovery → Plan Presentation → Execution → Safety Verification
+
+## 3-Layer Architecture & Auto-Strategy Selection
+
+### Layer Definition & Strategy Assignment
+
+| Layer | Depth | Strategy | Purpose | Context Pattern |
+|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------------|
+| **Layer 3** (Deepest) | ≥3 | `multi-layer` | Handle unstructured files, generate docs for all subdirectories | `@**/*` (all files) |
+| **Layer 2** (Middle) | 1-2 | `single-layer` | Aggregate from children + current code | `@*/CLAUDE.md @*.{ts,tsx,js,...}` |
+| **Layer 1** (Top) | 0 | `single-layer` | Aggregate from children + current code | `@*/CLAUDE.md @*.{ts,tsx,js,...}` |
+
+**Update Direction**: Layer 3 → Layer 2 → Layer 1 (bottom-up dependency flow)
+
+**Strategy Auto-Selection**: Strategies are automatically determined by directory depth - no user configuration needed.
+
+### Strategy Details
+
+#### Multi-Layer Strategy (Layer 3 Only)
+- **Use Case**: Deepest directories with unstructured file layouts
+- **Behavior**: Generates CLAUDE.md for current directory AND each subdirectory containing files
+- **Context**: All files in current directory tree (`@**/*`)
+- **Benefits**: Creates foundation documentation for upper layers to reference
+
+#### Single-Layer Strategy (Layers 1-2)
+- **Use Case**: Upper layers that aggregate from existing documentation
+- **Behavior**: Generates CLAUDE.md only for current directory
+- **Context**: Direct children CLAUDE.md files + current directory code files
+- **Benefits**: Minimal context consumption, clear layer separation
+
+### Example Flow
+```
+src/auth/handlers/ (depth 3) → MULTI-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @**/* (all files in handlers/ and subdirs)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md + CLAUDE.md in each subdir with files
+  ↓
+src/auth/ (depth 2) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/CLAUDE.md @*.ts (handlers/CLAUDE.md + current code)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md only
+  ↓
+src/ (depth 1) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/CLAUDE.md (auth/CLAUDE.md, utils/CLAUDE.md)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md only
+  ↓
+./ (depth 0) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/CLAUDE.md (src/CLAUDE.md, tests/CLAUDE.md)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md only
+```
+
+## Core Execution Rules
+
+1. **Analyze First**: Git cache + module discovery before updates
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Execution Strategy**:
+   - **<20 modules**: Direct parallel execution (max 4 concurrent per layer)
+   - **≥20 modules**: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent, 73% overhead reduction)
+4. **Tool Fallback**: Auto-retry with fallback tools on failure
+5. **Layer Sequential**: Process layers 3→2→1 (bottom-up), parallel batches within layer
+6. **Safety Check**: Verify only CLAUDE.md files modified
+7. **Layer-based Grouping**: Group modules by LAYER (not depth) for execution
+
+## Tool Fallback Hierarchy
+
+```javascript
+--tool gemini  →  [gemini, qwen, codex]  // default
+--tool qwen    →  [qwen, gemini, codex]
+--tool codex   →  [codex, gemini, qwen]
+```
+
+**Trigger**: Non-zero exit code from update script
+
+| Tool   | Best For                       | Fallback To    |
+|--------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| gemini | Documentation, patterns        | qwen → codex   |
+| qwen   | Architecture, system design    | gemini → codex |
+| codex  | Implementation, code quality   | gemini → qwen  |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Analysis
+
+```bash
+# Cache git changes
+bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
+
+# Get module structure
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list)
+# OR with --path
+bash(cd <target-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list)
+```
+
+**Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` to extract module paths and count.
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/docs based on project tech stack.
+
+### Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**For <20 modules**:
+```
+Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Total: 7 modules
+  Execution: Direct parallel (< 20 modules threshold)
+
+  Will update:
+  - ./core/interfaces (12 files) - depth 2 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - ./core (22 files) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - ./models (9 files) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - ./utils (12 files) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - . (5 files) - depth 0 [Layer 1] - single-layer strategy
+
+  Context Strategy (Auto-Selected):
+  - Layer 2 (depth 1-2): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+  - Layer 1 (depth 0): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+
+  Auto-skipped: ./tests, __pycache__, setup.py (15 paths)
+  Execution order: Layer 2 → Layer 1
+  Estimated time: ~5-10 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**For ≥20 modules**:
+```
+Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Total: 31 modules
+  Execution: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent)
+
+  Will update:
+  - ./src/features/auth (12 files) - depth 3 [Layer 3] - multi-layer strategy
+  - ./.claude/commands/cli (6 files) - depth 3 [Layer 3] - multi-layer strategy
+  - ./src/utils (8 files) - depth 2 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  ...
+
+  Context Strategy (Auto-Selected):
+  - Layer 3 (depth ≥3): @**/* (all files)
+  - Layer 2 (depth 1-2): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+  - Layer 1 (depth 0): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+  
+  Auto-skipped: ./tests, __pycache__, setup.py (15 paths)
+  Execution order: Layer 2 → Layer 1
+  Estimated time: ~5-10 minutes
+
+  Agent allocation (by LAYER):
+  - Layer 3 (14 modules, depth ≥3): 4 agents [4, 4, 4, 2]
+  - Layer 2 (15 modules, depth 1-2): 4 agents [4, 4, 4, 3]
+  - Layer 1 (2 modules, depth 0): 1 agent [2]
+
+  Estimated time: ~15-25 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+### Phase 3A: Direct Execution (<20 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Parallel execution within layer (max 4 concurrent), no agent overhead.
+
+```javascript
+// Group modules by LAYER (not depth)
+let modules_by_layer = group_by_layer(module_list);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+
+// Process by LAYER (3 → 2 → 1), not by depth
+for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
+  if (modules_by_layer[layer].length === 0) continue;
+
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_layer[layer], 4);
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    let parallel_tasks = batch.map(module => {
+      return async () => {
+        // Auto-determine strategy based on depth
+        let strategy = module.depth >= 3 ? "multi-layer" : "single-layer";
+
+        for (let tool of tool_order) {
+          let exit_code = bash(`cd ${module.path} && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "${strategy}" "." "${tool}"`);
+          if (exit_code === 0) {
+            report(`✅ ${module.path} (Layer ${layer}) updated with ${tool}`);
+            return true;
+          }
+        }
+        report(`❌ FAILED: ${module.path} (Layer ${layer}) failed all tools`);
+        return false;
+      };
+    });
+
+    await Promise.all(parallel_tasks.map(task => task()));
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3B: Agent Batch Execution (≥20 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Batch modules into groups of 4, spawn memory-bridge agents per batch.
+
+```javascript
+// Group modules by LAYER and batch within each layer
+let modules_by_layer = group_by_layer(module_list);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+
+for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
+  if (modules_by_layer[layer].length === 0) continue;
+
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_layer[layer], 4);
+  let worker_tasks = [];
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    worker_tasks.push(
+      Task(
+        subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+        description=`Update ${batch.length} modules in Layer ${layer}`,
+        prompt=generate_batch_worker_prompt(batch, tool_order, layer)
+      )
+    );
+  }
+
+  await parallel_execute(worker_tasks);
+}
+```
+
+**Batch Worker Prompt Template**:
+```
+PURPOSE: Update CLAUDE.md for assigned modules with tool fallback
+
+TASK: Update documentation for assigned modules using specified strategies.
+
+MODULES:
+{{module_path_1}} (strategy: {{strategy_1}})
+{{module_path_2}} (strategy: {{strategy_2}})
+...
+
+TOOLS (try in order): {{tool_1}}, {{tool_2}}, {{tool_3}}
+
+EXECUTION SCRIPT: ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh
+  - Accepts strategy parameter: multi-layer | single-layer
+  - Tool execution via direct CLI commands (gemini/qwen/codex)
+
+EXECUTION FLOW (for each module):
+  1. Tool fallback loop (exit on first success):
+     for tool in {{tool_1}} {{tool_2}} {{tool_3}}; do
+       bash(cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "{{strategy}}" "." "${tool}")
+       exit_code=$?
+
+       if [ $exit_code -eq 0 ]; then
+         report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with $tool"
+         break
+       else
+         report "⚠️  {{module_path}} failed with $tool, trying next..."
+         continue
+       fi
+     done
+
+  2. Handle complete failure (all tools failed):
+     if [ $exit_code -ne 0 ]; then
+       report "❌ FAILED: {{module_path}} - all tools exhausted"
+       # Continue to next module (do not abort batch)
+     fi
+
+FAILURE HANDLING:
+  - Module-level isolation: One module's failure does not affect others
+  - Exit code detection: Non-zero exit code triggers next tool
+  - Exhaustion reporting: Log modules where all tools failed
+  - Batch continuation: Always process remaining modules
+
+REPORTING FORMAT:
+  Per-module status:
+    ✅ path/to/module updated with {tool}
+    ⚠️  path/to/module failed with {tool}, trying next...
+    ❌ FAILED: path/to/module - all tools exhausted
+```
+### Phase 4: Safety Verification
+
+```bash
+# Check only CLAUDE.md modified
+bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "Only CLAUDE.md files modified")
+
+# Display status
+bash(git status --short)
+```
+
+**Result Summary**:
+```
+Update Summary:
+  Total: 31 | Success: 29 | Failed: 2
+  Tool usage: gemini: 25, qwen: 4, codex: 0
+  Failed: path1, path2
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Batch Worker**: Tool fallback per module, batch isolation, clear status reporting
+**Coordinator**: Invalid path abort, user decline handling, safety check with auto-revert
+**Fallback Triggers**: Non-zero exit code, script timeout, unexpected output
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Full project update (auto-strategy selection)
+/memory:update-full
+
+# Target specific directory
+/memory:update-full --path .claude
+/memory:update-full --path src/features/auth
+
+# Use specific tool
+/memory:update-full --tool qwen
+/memory:update-full --path .claude --tool qwen
+```
+
+## Key Advantages
+
+- **Efficiency**: 30 modules → 8 agents (73% reduction from sequential)
+- **Resilience**: 3-tier tool fallback per module
+- **Performance**: Parallel batches, no concurrency limits
+- **Observability**: Per-module tool usage, batch-level metrics
+- **Automation**: Zero configuration - strategy auto-selected by directory depth

.claude/commands/memory/update-related.md

@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
+---
+name: update-related
+description: Update CLAUDE.md for git-changed modules using batched agent execution (4 modules/agent) with gemini→qwen→codex fallback, <15 modules uses direct execution
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
+---
+
+# Related Documentation Update (/memory:update-related)
+
+## Overview
+
+Orchestrates context-aware CLAUDE.md updates for changed modules using batched agent execution with automatic tool fallback (gemini→qwen→codex).
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`: Primary tool (default: gemini)
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. Change Detection → 2. Plan Presentation → 3. Batched Agent Execution → 4. Safety Verification
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Detect Changes First**: Use git diff to identify affected modules
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Execution Strategy**:
+   - <15 modules: Direct parallel execution (max 4 concurrent per depth, no agent overhead)
+   - ≥15 modules: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent, 73% overhead reduction)
+4. **Tool Fallback**: Auto-retry with fallback tools on failure
+5. **Depth Sequential**: Process depths N→0, parallel batches within depth (both modes)
+6. **Related Mode**: Update only changed modules and their parent contexts
+
+## Tool Fallback Hierarchy
+
+```javascript
+--tool gemini  →  [gemini, qwen, codex]  // default
+--tool qwen    →  [qwen, gemini, codex]
+--tool codex   →  [codex, gemini, qwen]
+```
+
+**Trigger**: Non-zero exit code from update script
+
+## Phase 1: Change Detection & Analysis
+
+```bash
+# Detect changed modules (no index refresh needed)
+bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list)
+
+# Cache git changes
+bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
+```
+
+**Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|change:<TYPE>` to extract affected modules.
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/docs based on project tech stack (Node.js/Python/Go/Rust/etc).
+
+**Fallback**: If no changes detected, use recent modules (first 10 by depth).
+
+## Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**Present filtered plan**:
+```
+Related Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Changed: 4 modules | Batching: 4 modules/agent
+
+  Will update:
+  - ./src/api/auth (5 files) [new module]
+  - ./src/api (12 files) [parent of changed auth/]
+  - ./src (8 files) [parent context]
+  - . (14 files) [root level]
+
+  Auto-skipped (12 paths):
+  - Tests: ./src/api/auth.test.ts (8 paths)
+  - Config: tsconfig.json (3 paths)
+  - Other: node_modules (1 path)
+
+  Agent allocation:
+  - Depth 3 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 2 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 1 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 0 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**Decision logic**:
+- User confirms "y": Proceed with execution
+- User declines "n": Abort, no changes
+- <15 modules: Direct execution
+- ≥15 modules: Agent batch execution
+
+## Phase 3A: Direct Execution (<15 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Parallel execution within depth (max 4 concurrent), no agent overhead, tool fallback per module.
+
+```javascript
+let modules_by_depth = group_by_depth(changed_modules);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+
+for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
+  let modules = modules_by_depth[depth];
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules, 4);  // Split into groups of 4
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    // Execute batch in parallel (max 4 concurrent)
+    let parallel_tasks = batch.map(module => {
+      return async () => {
+        let success = false;
+        for (let tool of tool_order) {
+          let exit_code = bash(cd ${module.path} && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "${tool}");
+          if (exit_code === 0) {
+            report("${module.path} updated with ${tool}");
+            success = true;
+            break;
+          }
+        }
+        if (!success) {
+          report("FAILED: ${module.path} failed all tools");
+        }
+      };
+    });
+
+    await Promise.all(parallel_tasks.map(task => task()));  // Run batch in parallel
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Benefits**:
+- No agent startup overhead
+- Parallel execution within depth (max 4 concurrent)
+- Tool fallback still applies per module
+- Faster for small changesets (<15 modules)
+- Same batching strategy as Phase 3B but without agent layer
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3B: Agent Batch Execution (≥15 modules)
+
+### Batching Strategy
+
+```javascript
+// Batch modules into groups of 4
+function batch_modules(modules, batch_size = 4) {
+  let batches = [];
+  for (let i = 0; i < modules.length; i += batch_size) {
+    batches.push(modules.slice(i, i + batch_size));
+  }
+  return batches;
+}
+// Examples: 10→[4,4,2] | 8→[4,4] | 3→[3]
+```
+
+### Coordinator Orchestration
+
+```javascript
+let modules_by_depth = group_by_depth(changed_modules);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+
+for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_depth[depth], 4);
+  let worker_tasks = [];
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    worker_tasks.push(
+      Task(
+        subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+        description=`Update ${batch.length} modules at depth ${depth}`,
+        prompt=generate_batch_worker_prompt(batch, tool_order, "related")
+      )
+    );
+  }
+
+  await parallel_execute(worker_tasks);  // Batches run in parallel
+}
+```
+
+### Batch Worker Prompt Template
+
+```
+PURPOSE: Update CLAUDE.md for assigned modules with tool fallback (related mode)
+
+TASK:
+Update documentation for the following modules based on recent changes. For each module, try tools in order until success.
+
+MODULES:
+{{module_path_1}}
+{{module_path_2}}
+{{module_path_3}}
+{{module_path_4}}
+
+TOOLS (try in order):
+1. {{tool_1}}
+2. {{tool_2}}
+3. {{tool_3}}
+
+EXECUTION:
+For each module above:
+  1. cd "{{module_path}}"
+  2. Try tool 1:
+     bash(cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "{{tool_1}}")
+     → Success: Report "{{module_path}} updated with {{tool_1}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Try tool 2
+  3. Try tool 2:
+     bash(cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "{{tool_2}}")
+     → Success: Report "{{module_path}} updated with {{tool_2}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Try tool 3
+  4. Try tool 3:
+     bash(cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "{{tool_3}}")
+     → Success: Report "{{module_path}} updated with {{tool_3}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Report "FAILED: {{module_path}} failed all tools", proceed to next module
+
+REPORTING:
+Report final summary with:
+- Total processed: X modules
+- Successful: Y modules
+- Failed: Z modules
+- Tool usage: {{tool_1}}:X, {{tool_2}}:Y, {{tool_3}}:Z
+- Detailed results for each module
+```
+
+### Example Execution
+
+**Depth 3 (new module)**:
+```javascript
+Task(subagent_type="memory-bridge", batch=[./src/api/auth], mode="related")
+```
+
+**Benefits**:
+- 4 modules → 1 agent (75% reduction)
+- Parallel batches, sequential within batch
+- Each module gets full fallback chain
+- Context-aware updates based on git changes
+
+## Phase 4: Safety Verification
+
+```bash
+# Check only CLAUDE.md modified
+bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "Only CLAUDE.md files modified")
+
+# Display statistics
+bash(git diff --stat)
+```
+
+**Aggregate results**:
+```
+Update Summary:
+  Total: 4 | Success: 4 | Failed: 0
+
+  Tool usage:
+  - gemini: 4 modules
+  - qwen: 0 modules (fallback)
+  - codex: 0 modules
+
+  Changes:
+  src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++
+  src/api/CLAUDE.md       | 23 +++++++++--
+  src/CLAUDE.md           | 12 ++++--
+  CLAUDE.md               | 8 ++--
+  4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+```
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+**Module Count Threshold**:
+- **<15 modules**: Coordinator executes Phase 3A (Direct Execution)
+- **≥15 modules**: Coordinator executes Phase 3B (Agent Batch Execution)
+
+**Agent Hierarchy** (for ≥15 modules):
+- **Coordinator**: Handles batch division, spawns worker agents per depth
+- **Worker Agents**: Each processes 4 modules with tool fallback (related mode)
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Batch Worker**:
+- Tool fallback per module (auto-retry)
+- Batch isolation (failures don't propagate)
+- Clear per-module status reporting
+
+**Coordinator**:
+- No changes: Use fallback (recent 10 modules)
+- User decline: No execution
+- Safety check fail: Auto-revert staging
+- Partial failures: Continue execution, report failed modules
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+- Non-zero exit code
+- Script timeout
+- Unexpected output
+
+## Tool Reference
+
+| Tool   | Best For                       | Fallback To    |
+|--------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| gemini | Documentation, patterns        | qwen → codex   |
+| qwen   | Architecture, system design    | gemini → codex |
+| codex  | Implementation, code quality   | gemini → qwen  |
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Daily development update
+/memory:update-related
+
+# After feature work with specific tool
+/memory:update-related --tool qwen
+
+# Code quality review after implementation
+/memory:update-related --tool codex
+```
+
+## Key Advantages
+
+**Efficiency**: 30 modules → 8 agents (73% reduction)
+**Resilience**: 3-tier fallback per module
+**Performance**: Parallel batches, no concurrency limits
+**Context-aware**: Updates based on actual git changes
+**Fast**: Only affected modules, not entire project
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+- Parse `--tool` (default: gemini)
+- Refresh code index for accurate change detection
+- Detect changed modules via detect_changed_modules.sh
+- **Smart filter modules** (auto-detect tech stack, skip tests/build/config/docs)
+- Cache git changes
+- Apply fallback if no changes (recent 10 modules)
+- Construct tool fallback order
+- **Present filtered plan** with skip reasons and change types
+- **Wait for y/n confirmation**
+- Determine execution mode:
+  - **<15 modules**: Direct execution (Phase 3A)
+    - For each depth (N→0): Sequential module updates with tool fallback
+  - **≥15 modules**: Agent batch execution (Phase 3B)
+    - For each depth (N→0): Batch modules (4 per batch), spawn batch workers in parallel
+- Wait for depth/batch completion
+- Aggregate results
+- Safety check (only CLAUDE.md modified)
+- Display git diff statistics + summary
+
+## Comparison with Full Update
+
+| Aspect | Related Update | Full Update |
+|--------|----------------|-------------|
+| **Scope** | Changed modules only | All project modules |
+| **Speed** | Fast (minutes) | Slower (10-30 min) |
+| **Use case** | Daily development | Major refactoring |
+| **Mode** | `"related"` | `"full"` |
+| **Trigger** | After commits | After major changes |
+| **Batching** | 4 modules/agent | 4 modules/agent |
+| **Fallback** | gemini→qwen→codex | gemini→qwen→codex |
+| **Complexity threshold** | ≤15 modules | ≤20 modules |

.claude/commands/memory/workflow-skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+---
+name: workflow-skill-memory
+description: Process WFS-* archived sessions using universal-executor agents with Gemini analysis to generate workflow-progress SKILL package (sessions-timeline, lessons, conflicts)
+argument-hint: "session <session-id> | all"
+allowed-tools: Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow SKILL Memory Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+Generate SKILL package from archived workflow sessions using agent-driven analysis. Supports single-session incremental updates or parallel processing of all sessions.
+
+**Scope**: Only processes WFS-* workflow sessions. Other session types (e.g., doc sessions) are automatically ignored.
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory session WFS-<session-id>   # Process single WFS session
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory all                        # Process all WFS sessions in parallel
+```
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Mode 1: Single Session (`session <session-id>`)
+
+**Purpose**: Incremental update - process one archived session and merge into existing SKILL package
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. **Validate session**: Check if session exists in `.workflow/.archives/{session-id}/`
+2. **Invoke agent**: Call `universal-executor` to analyze session and update SKILL documents
+3. **Agent tasks**:
+   - Read session data from `.workflow/.archives/{session-id}/`
+   - Extract lessons, conflicts, and outcomes
+   - Use Gemini for intelligent aggregation (optional)
+   - Update or create SKILL documents using templates
+   - Regenerate SKILL.md index
+
+**Command Example**:
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory session WFS-user-auth
+```
+
+**Expected Output**:
+```
+Session WFS-user-auth processed
+Updated:
+- sessions-timeline.md (1 session added)
+- lessons-learned.md (3 lessons merged)
+- conflict-patterns.md (1 conflict added)
+- SKILL.md (index regenerated)
+```
+
+---
+
+### Mode 2: All Sessions (`all`)
+
+**Purpose**: Full regeneration - process all archived sessions in parallel for complete SKILL package
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. **List sessions**: Read manifest.json to get all archived session IDs
+2. **Parallel invocation**: Launch multiple `universal-executor` agents in parallel (one per session)
+3. **Agent coordination**:
+   - Each agent processes one session independently
+   - Agents use Gemini for analysis
+   - Agents collect data into JSON (no direct file writes)
+   - Final aggregator agent merges results and generates SKILL documents
+
+**Command Example**:
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory all
+```
+
+**Expected Output**:
+```
+All sessions processed in parallel
+Sessions: 8 total
+Updated:
+- sessions-timeline.md (8 sessions)
+- lessons-learned.md (24 lessons aggregated)
+- conflict-patterns.md (12 conflicts documented)
+- SKILL.md (index regenerated)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Validation and Setup
+
+**Step 1.1: Parse Command Arguments**
+
+Extract mode and session ID:
+```javascript
+if (args === "all") {
+  mode = "all"
+} else if (args.startsWith("session ")) {
+  mode = "session"
+  session_id = args.replace("session ", "").trim()
+} else {
+  ERROR = "Invalid arguments. Usage: session <session-id> | all"
+  EXIT
+}
+```
+
+**Step 1.2: Validate Archive Directory**
+```bash
+bash(test -d .workflow/.archives && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+If missing, report error and exit.
+
+**Step 1.3: Mode-Specific Validation**
+
+**Single Session Mode**:
+```bash
+# Validate session ID format (must start with WFS-)
+if [[ ! "$session_id" =~ ^WFS- ]]; then
+  ERROR = "Invalid session ID format. Only WFS-* sessions are supported"
+  EXIT
+fi
+
+# Check if session exists
+bash(test -d .workflow/.archives/{session_id} && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+If missing, report error: "Session {session_id} not found in archives"
+
+**All Sessions Mode**:
+```bash
+# Read manifest and filter only WFS- sessions
+bash(cat .workflow/.archives/manifest.json | jq -r '.archives[].session_id | select(startswith("WFS-"))')
+```
+
+Store filtered session IDs in array. Ignore doc sessions and other non-WFS sessions.
+
+**Step 1.4: TodoWrite Initialization**
+
+**Single Session Mode**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Validate session existence", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Validating session"},
+  {"content": "Invoke agent to process session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Invoking agent"},
+  {"content": "Verify SKILL package updated", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Verifying update"}
+]})
+```
+
+**All Sessions Mode**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Read manifest and list sessions", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Reading manifest"},
+  {"content": "Invoke agents in parallel", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Invoking agents"},
+  {"content": "Verify SKILL package regenerated", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Verifying regeneration"}
+]})
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Invocation
+
+#### Single Session Mode - Agent Task
+
+Invoke `universal-executor` with session-specific task:
+
+**Agent Prompt Structure**:
+```
+Task: Process Workflow Session for SKILL Package
+
+Context:
+- Session ID: {session_id}
+- Session Path: .workflow/.archives/{session_id}/
+- Mode: Incremental update
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Read session data:
+   - workflow-session.json (metadata)
+   - IMPL_PLAN.md (implementation summary)
+   - TODO_LIST.md (if exists)
+   - manifest.json entry for lessons
+
+2. Extract key information:
+   - Description, tags, metrics
+   - Lessons (successes, challenges, watch_patterns)
+   - Context package path (reference only)
+   - Key outcomes from IMPL_PLAN
+
+3. Use Gemini for aggregation (optional):
+   Command pattern:
+   cd .workflow/.archives/{session_id} && gemini -p "
+   PURPOSE: Extract lessons and conflicts from workflow session
+   TASK:
+   • Analyze IMPL_PLAN and lessons from manifest
+   • Identify success patterns and challenges
+   • Extract conflict patterns with resolutions
+   • Categorize by functional domain
+   MODE: analysis
+   CONTEXT: @IMPL_PLAN.md @workflow-session.json
+   EXPECTED: Structured lessons and conflicts in JSON format
+   RULES: Template reference from skill-aggregation.txt
+   "
+
+3.5. **Generate SKILL.md Description** (CRITICAL for auto-loading):
+
+   Read skill-index.txt template Section: "Description Field Generation"
+
+   Execute command to get project root:
+   ```bash
+   git rev-parse --show-toplevel  # Example output: /d/Claude_dms3
+   ```
+
+   Apply description format:
+   ```
+   Progressive workflow development history (located at {project_root}).
+   Load this SKILL when continuing development, analyzing past implementations,
+   or learning from workflow history, especially when no relevant context exists in memory.
+   ```
+
+   **Validation**:
+   - [ ] Path uses forward slashes (not backslashes)
+   - [ ] All three use cases present
+   - [ ] Trigger optimization phrase included
+   - [ ] Path is absolute (starts with / or drive letter)
+
+4. Read templates for formatting guidance:
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-sessions-timeline.txt
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-lessons-learned.txt
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-conflict-patterns.txt
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-index.txt
+
+   **CRITICAL**: From skill-index.txt, read these sections:
+   - "Description Field Generation" - Rules for generating description
+   - "Variable Substitution Guide" - All required variables
+   - "Generation Instructions" - Step-by-step generation process
+   - "Validation Checklist" - Final validation steps
+
+5. Update SKILL documents:
+   - sessions-timeline.md: Append new session, update domain grouping
+   - lessons-learned.md: Merge lessons into categories, update frequencies
+   - conflict-patterns.md: Add conflicts, update recurring pattern frequencies
+   - SKILL.md: Regenerate index with updated counts
+
+   **For SKILL.md generation**:
+   - Follow "Generation Instructions" from skill-index.txt (Steps 1-7)
+   - Use git command for project_root: `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`
+   - Apply "Description Field Generation" rules
+   - Validate using "Validation Checklist"
+   - Increment version (patch level)
+
+6. Return result JSON:
+   {
+     "status": "success",
+     "session_id": "{session_id}",
+     "updates": {
+       "sessions_added": 1,
+       "lessons_merged": count,
+       "conflicts_added": count
+     }
+   }
+```
+
+---
+
+#### All Sessions Mode - Parallel Agent Tasks
+
+**Step 2.1: Launch parallel session analyzers**
+
+Invoke multiple agents in parallel (one message with multiple Task calls):
+
+**Per-Session Agent Prompt**:
+```
+Task: Extract Session Data for SKILL Package
+
+Context:
+- Session ID: {session_id}
+- Mode: Parallel analysis (no direct file writes)
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Read session data (same as single mode)
+
+2. Extract key information (same as single mode)
+
+3. Use Gemini for analysis (same as single mode)
+
+4. Return structured data JSON:
+   {
+     "status": "success",
+     "session_id": "{session_id}",
+     "data": {
+       "metadata": {
+         "description": "...",
+         "archived_at": "...",
+         "tags": [...],
+         "metrics": {...}
+       },
+       "lessons": {
+         "successes": [...],
+         "challenges": [...],
+         "watch_patterns": [...]
+       },
+       "conflicts": [
+         {
+           "type": "architecture|dependencies|testing|performance",
+           "pattern": "...",
+           "resolution": "...",
+           "code_impact": [...]
+         }
+       ],
+       "impl_summary": "First 200 chars of IMPL_PLAN",
+       "context_package_path": "..."
+     }
+   }
+```
+
+**Step 2.2: Aggregate results**
+
+After all session agents complete, invoke aggregator agent:
+
+**Aggregator Agent Prompt**:
+```
+Task: Aggregate Session Results and Generate SKILL Package
+
+Context:
+- Mode: Full regeneration
+- Input: JSON results from {session_count} session agents
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Aggregate all session data:
+   - Collect metadata from all sessions
+   - Merge lessons by category
+   - Group conflicts by type
+   - Sort sessions by date
+
+2. Use Gemini for final aggregation:
+   gemini -p "
+   PURPOSE: Aggregate lessons and conflicts from all workflow sessions
+   TASK:
+   • Group successes by functional domain
+   • Categorize challenges by severity (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
+   • Identify recurring conflict patterns
+   • Calculate frequencies and prioritize
+   MODE: analysis
+   CONTEXT: [Provide aggregated JSON data]
+   EXPECTED: Final aggregated structure for SKILL documents
+   RULES: Template reference from skill-aggregation.txt
+   "
+
+3. Read templates for formatting (same 4 templates as single mode)
+
+4. Generate all SKILL documents:
+   - sessions-timeline.md (all sessions, sorted by date)
+   - lessons-learned.md (aggregated lessons with frequencies)
+   - conflict-patterns.md (recurring patterns with resolutions)
+   - SKILL.md (index with progressive loading)
+
+5. Write files to .claude/skills/workflow-progress/
+
+6. Return result JSON:
+   {
+     "status": "success",
+     "sessions_processed": count,
+     "files_generated": ["SKILL.md", "sessions-timeline.md", ...],
+     "summary": {
+       "total_sessions": count,
+       "functional_domains": [...],
+       "date_range": "...",
+       "lessons_count": count,
+       "conflicts_count": count
+     }
+   }
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Verification
+
+**Step 3.1: Check SKILL Package Files**
+```bash
+bash(ls -lh .claude/skills/workflow-progress/)
+```
+
+Verify all 4 files exist:
+- SKILL.md
+- sessions-timeline.md
+- lessons-learned.md
+- conflict-patterns.md
+
+**Step 3.2: TodoWrite Completion**
+
+Mark all tasks as completed.
+
+**Step 3.3: Display Summary**
+
+**Single Session Mode**:
+```
+Session {session_id} processed successfully
+
+Updated:
+- sessions-timeline.md
+- lessons-learned.md
+- conflict-patterns.md
+- SKILL.md
+
+SKILL Location: .claude/skills/workflow-progress/SKILL.md
+```
+
+**All Sessions Mode**:
+```
+All sessions processed in parallel
+
+Sessions: {count} total
+Functional Domains: {domain_list}
+Date Range: {earliest} - {latest}
+
+Generated:
+- sessions-timeline.md ({count} sessions)
+- lessons-learned.md ({lessons_count} lessons)
+- conflict-patterns.md ({conflicts_count} conflicts)
+- SKILL.md (4-level progressive loading)
+
+SKILL Location: .claude/skills/workflow-progress/SKILL.md
+
+Usage:
+- Level 0: Quick refresh (~2K tokens)
+- Level 1: Recent history (~8K tokens)
+- Level 2: Complete analysis (~25K tokens)
+- Level 3: Deep dive (~40K tokens)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Agent Guidelines
+
+### Agent Capabilities
+
+**universal-executor agents can**:
+- Read files from `.workflow/.archives/`
+- Execute bash commands
+- Call Gemini CLI for intelligent analysis
+- Read template files for formatting guidance
+- Write SKILL package files (single mode) or return JSON (parallel mode)
+- Return structured results
+
+### Gemini Usage Pattern
+
+**When to use Gemini**:
+- Aggregating lessons from multiple sources
+- Identifying recurring patterns
+- Classifying conflicts by type and severity
+- Extracting structured data from IMPL_PLAN
+
+**Fallback Strategy**: If Gemini fails or times out, use direct file parsing with structured extraction logic.
+
+---
+
+## Template System
+
+### Template Files
+
+All templates located in: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/`
+
+1. **skill-sessions-timeline.txt**: Format for sessions-timeline.md
+2. **skill-lessons-learned.txt**: Format for lessons-learned.md
+3. **skill-conflict-patterns.txt**: Format for conflict-patterns.md
+4. **skill-index.txt**: Format for SKILL.md index
+5. **skill-aggregation.txt**: Rules for Gemini aggregation (existing)
+
+### Template Usage in Agent
+
+**Agents read templates to understand**:
+- File structure and markdown format
+- Data sources (which files to read)
+- Update strategy (incremental vs full)
+- Formatting rules and conventions
+- Aggregation logic (for Gemini)
+
+**Templates are NOT shown in this command documentation** - agents read them directly as needed.
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Validation Errors
+- **No archives directory**: "Error: No workflow archives found at .workflow/.archives/"
+- **Invalid session ID format**: "Error: Invalid session ID format. Only WFS-* sessions are supported"
+- **Session not found**: "Error: Session {session_id} not found in archives"
+- **No WFS sessions in manifest**: "Error: No WFS-* workflow sessions found in manifest.json"
+
+### Agent Errors
+- If agent fails, report error message from agent result
+- If Gemini times out, agents use fallback direct parsing
+- If template read fails, agents use inline format
+
+### Recovery
+- Single session mode: Can be retried without affecting other sessions
+- All sessions mode: If one agent fails, others continue; retry failed sessions individually
+
+
+
+## Integration
+
+### Called by `/workflow:session:complete`
+
+Automatically invoked after session archival:
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/memory:workflow-skill-memory session {session_id}")
+```
+
+### Manual Invocation
+
+Users can manually process sessions:
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory session WFS-custom-feature  # Single session
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory all                         # Full regeneration
+```

.claude/commands/task/breakdown.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: breakdown
-description: Intelligent task decomposition with context-aware subtask generation
+description: Decompose complex task into subtasks with dependency mapping, creates child task JSONs with parent references and execution order
 argument-hint: "task-id"
 ---
 
@@ -10,13 +10,12 @@ argument-hint: "task-id"
 Breaks down complex tasks into executable subtasks with context inheritance and agent assignment.
 
 ## Core Principles
-**Task System:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
 **File Cohesion:** Related files must stay in same task
 **10-Task Limit:** Total tasks cannot exceed 10 (triggers re-scoping)
 
 ## Core Features
 
-⚠️ **CRITICAL**: Manual breakdown with safety controls to prevent file conflicts and task limit violations.
+**CRITICAL**: Manual breakdown with safety controls to prevent file conflicts and task limit violations.
 
 ### Breakdown Process
 1. **Session Check**: Verify active session contains parent task
@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ Interactive process:
 Task: Build authentication module
 Current total tasks: 6/10
 
-⚠️  MANUAL BREAKDOWN REQUIRED
+MANUAL BREAKDOWN REQUIRED
 Define subtasks manually (remaining capacity: 4 tasks):
 
 1. Enter subtask title: User authentication core
@@ -60,20 +59,34 @@ Define subtasks manually (remaining capacity: 4 tasks):
 2. Enter subtask title: OAuth integration
    Focus files: services/OAuthService.js, routes/oauth.js
 
-⚠️  FILE CONFLICT DETECTED:
+FILE CONFLICT DETECTED:
    - routes/auth.js appears in multiple subtasks
    - Recommendation: Merge related authentication routes
 
-⚠️  SIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY WARNING:
+SIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY WARNING:
    - "User authentication" and "OAuth integration" both handle auth
    - Consider combining into single task
 
-Proceed with breakdown? (y/n): y
+# Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "File conflicts and/or similar functionality detected. How do you want to proceed?",
+    header: "Confirm",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Proceed with breakdown", description: "Accept the risks and create the subtasks as defined." },
+      { label: "Restart breakdown", description: "Discard current subtasks and start over." },
+      { label: "Cancel breakdown", description: "Abort the operation and leave the parent task as is." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
 
-✅ Task IMPL-1 broken down:
-▸ IMPL-1: Build authentication module (container)
-  ├── IMPL-1.1: User authentication core → @code-developer
-  └── IMPL-1.2: OAuth integration → @code-developer
+User selected: "Proceed with breakdown"
+
+Task IMPL-1 broken down:
+IMPL-1: Build authentication module (container)
+  ├── IMPL-1.1: User authentication core -> @code-developer
+  └── IMPL-1.2: OAuth integration -> @code-developer
 
 Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 ```
@@ -85,7 +98,7 @@ Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 - **Implementation** → `@code-developer`
 - **Testing** → `@code-developer` (type: "test-gen")
 - **Test Validation** → `@test-fix-agent` (type: "test-fix")
-- **Review** → `@general-purpose` (optional)
+- **Review** → `@universal-executor` (optional)
 
 ### Context Inheritance
 - Subtasks inherit parent requirements
@@ -124,7 +137,6 @@ Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 
 ## Implementation Details
 
-See @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md for:
 - Complete task JSON schema
 - Implementation field structure
 - Context inheritance rules
@@ -155,45 +167,38 @@ See @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md for:
 ```bash
 /task:breakdown impl-1
 
-▸ impl-1: Build authentication (container)
-  ├── impl-1.1: Design schema → @planning-agent
-  ├── impl-1.2: Implement logic + tests → @code-developer
-  └── impl-1.3: Execute & fix tests → @test-fix-agent
+impl-1: Build authentication (container)
+  ├── impl-1.1: Design schema -> @planning-agent
+  ├── impl-1.2: Implement logic + tests -> @code-developer
+  └── impl-1.3: Execute & fix tests -> @test-fix-agent
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling
 
 ```bash
 # Task not found
-❌ Task IMPL-5 not found
+Task IMPL-5 not found
 
 # Already broken down
-⚠️ Task IMPL-1 already has subtasks
+Task IMPL-1 already has subtasks
 
 # Wrong status
-❌ Cannot breakdown completed task IMPL-2
+Cannot breakdown completed task IMPL-2
 
 # 10-task limit exceeded
-❌ Breakdown would exceed 10-task limit (current: 8, proposed: 4)
-   Suggestion: Re-scope project into smaller iterations
+Breakdown would exceed 10-task limit (current: 8, proposed: 4)
+Suggestion: Re-scope project into smaller iterations
 
 # File conflicts detected
-⚠️ File conflict: routes/auth.js appears in IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2
-   Recommendation: Merge subtasks or redistribute files
+File conflict: routes/auth.js appears in IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2
+Recommendation: Merge subtasks or redistribute files
 
 # Similar functionality warning
-⚠️ Similar functions detected: "user login" and "authentication"
-   Consider consolidating related functionality
+Similar functions detected: "user login" and "authentication"
+Consider consolidating related functionality
 
 # Manual breakdown required
-❌ Automatic breakdown disabled. Use manual breakdown process.
+Automatic breakdown disabled. Use manual breakdown process.
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/task:create` - Create new tasks
-- `/task:execute` - Execute subtasks
-- `/workflow:status` - View task hierarchy
-- `/workflow:plan` - Plan within 10-task limit
-
 **System ensures**: Manual breakdown control with file cohesion enforcement, similar functionality detection, and 10-task limit compliance

.claude/commands/task/create.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: create
-description: Create implementation tasks with automatic context awareness
+description: Generate task JSON from natural language description with automatic file pattern detection, scope inference, and dependency analysis
 argument-hint: "\"task title\""
 ---
 
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Creates new implementation tasks with automatic context awareness and ID generat
 
 Output:
 ```
-✅ Task created: IMPL-1
+Task created: IMPL-1
 Title: Build authentication module
 Type: feature
 Agent: code-developer
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Status: pending
 ### Analysis Triggers
 When implementation details incomplete:
 ```bash
-⚠️ Task requires analysis for implementation details
+Task requires analysis for implementation details
 Suggest running: gemini analysis for file locations and dependencies
 ```
 
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Based on task type and title keywords:
 - **Design/Plan** → @planning-agent
 - **Test Generation** → @code-developer (type: "test-gen")
 - **Test Execution/Fix** → @test-fix-agent (type: "test-fix")
-- **Review/Audit** → @general-purpose (optional, only when explicitly requested)
+- **Review/Audit** → @universal-executor (optional, only when explicitly requested)
 
 ## Validation Rules
 
@@ -117,16 +117,16 @@ Based on task type and title keywords:
 
 ```bash
 # No workflow session
-❌ No active workflow found
-→ Use: /workflow init "project name"
+No active workflow found
+Use: /workflow init "project name"
 
 # Duplicate task
-⚠️ Similar task exists: IMPL-3
-→ Continue anyway? (y/n)
+Similar task exists: IMPL-3
+Continue anyway? (y/n)
 
 # Max depth exceeded
-❌ Cannot create IMPL-1.2.1 (max 2 levels)
-→ Use: IMPL-2 for new main task
+Cannot create IMPL-1.2.1 (max 2 levels)
+Use: IMPL-2 for new main task
 ```
 
 ## Examples
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ Based on task type and title keywords:
 ```bash
 /task:create "Implement user authentication"
 
-✅ Created IMPL-1: Implement user authentication
+Created IMPL-1: Implement user authentication
 Type: feature
 Agent: code-developer
 Status: pending
@@ -145,14 +145,8 @@ Status: pending
 ```bash
 /task:create "Fix login validation bug" --type=bugfix
 
-✅ Created IMPL-2: Fix login validation bug
+Created IMPL-2: Fix login validation bug
 Type: bugfix
 Agent: code-developer
 Status: pending
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/task:breakdown` - Break into subtasks
-- `/task:execute` - Execute with agent
-- `/context` - View task details
+```

.claude/commands/task/execute.md

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 ---
 name: execute
-description: Execute tasks with appropriate agents and context-aware orchestration
+description: Execute task JSON using appropriate agent (@doc-generator/@implementation-agent/@test-agent) with pre-analysis context loading and status tracking
 argument-hint: "task-id"
 ---
 
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/task:execute`**
+## Command Overview: /task:execute
 
--   **Purpose**: Executes tasks using intelligent agent selection, context preparation, and progress tracking.
--   **Core Principles**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
+**Purpose**: Executes tasks using intelligent agent selection, context preparation, and progress tracking.
 
-### ⚙️ **Execution Modes**
+
+## Execution Modes
 
 -   **auto (Default)**
     -   Fully autonomous execution with automatic agent selection.
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ argument-hint: "task-id"
     -   Executes step-by-step, requiring user confirmation at each checkpoint.
     -   Allows for dynamic adjustments and manual review during the process.
 -   **review**
-    -   Optional manual review using `@general-purpose`.
+    -   Optional manual review using `@universal-executor`.
     -   Used only when explicitly requested by user.
 
-### 🤖 **Agent Selection Logic**
+## Agent Selection Logic
 
 The system determines the appropriate agent for a task using the following logic.
 
@@ -45,18 +45,18 @@ FUNCTION select_agent(task, agent_override):
             WHEN CONTAINS "Execute tests", "Fix tests", "Validate":
                 RETURN "@test-fix-agent" // type: test-fix
             WHEN CONTAINS "Review code":
-                RETURN "@general-purpose" // Optional manual review
+                RETURN "@universal-executor" // Optional manual review
             DEFAULT:
                 RETURN "@code-developer" // Default agent
         END CASE
 END FUNCTION
 ```
 
-### 🔄 **Core Execution Protocol**
+## Core Execution Protocol
 
-`Pre-Execution` **->** `Execution` **->** `Post-Execution`
+`Pre-Execution` -> `Execution` -> `Post-Execution`
 
-### ✅ **Pre-Execution Protocol**
+### Pre-Execution Protocol
 
 `Validate Task & Dependencies` **->** `Prepare Execution Context` **->** `Coordinate with TodoWrite`
 
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ END FUNCTION
 -   **Session Context Injection**: Provides workflow directory paths to agents for TODO_LIST.md and summary management.
 -   **TodoWrite Coordination**: Generates execution Todos and checkpoints, syncing with `TODO_LIST.md`.
 
-### 🏁 **Post-Execution Protocol**
+### Post-Execution Protocol
 
 `Update Task Status` **->** `Generate Summary` **->** `Save Artifacts` **->** `Sync All Progress` **->** `Validate File Integrity`
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ END FUNCTION
 -   Creates a summary in `.summaries/`.
 -   Stores outputs and syncs progress across the entire workflow session.
 
-### 🧠 **Task & Subtask Execution Logic**
+### Task & Subtask Execution Logic
 
 This logic defines how single, multiple, or parent tasks are handled.
 
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ FUNCTION execute_task_command(task_id, mode, parallel_flag):
 END FUNCTION
 ```
 
-### 🛡️ **Error Handling & Recovery Logic**
+### Error Handling & Recovery Logic
 
 ```pseudo
 FUNCTION pre_execution_check(task):
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ END FUNCTION
 ```
 
 
-### 📄 **Simplified Context Structure (JSON)**
+### Simplified Context Structure (JSON)
 
 This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task execution.
 
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task executi
       "pre_analysis": [
         {
           "action": "analyze patterns",
-          "template": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt",
+          "template": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt",
           "method": "gemini"
         }
       ]
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task executi
 }
 ```
 
-### 🎯 **Agent-Specific Context**
+### Agent-Specific Context
 
 Different agents receive context tailored to their function, including implementation details:
 
@@ -236,20 +236,20 @@ Different agents receive context tailored to their function, including implement
 - Error conditions to validate from implementation.context_notes.error_handling
 - Performance requirements from implementation.context_notes.performance_considerations
 
-**`@general-purpose`**:
+**`@universal-executor`**:
 - Used for optional manual reviews when explicitly requested
 - Code quality standards and implementation patterns
 - Security considerations from implementation.context_notes.risks
 - Dependency validation from implementation.context_notes.dependencies
 - Architecture compliance checks
 
-### 🗃️ **Simplified File Output**
+### Simplified File Output
 
 -   **Task JSON File (`.task/<task-id>.json`)**: Updated with status and last attempt time only.
 -   **Session File (`workflow-session.json`)**: Updated task stats (completed count).
 -   **Summary File**: Generated in `.summaries/` upon completion (optional).
 
-### 📝 **Simplified Summary Template**
+### Simplified Summary Template
 
 Optional summary file generated at `.summaries/IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`.
 

.claude/commands/task/replan.md

@@ -1,57 +1,95 @@
 ---
 name: replan
-description: Replan individual tasks with detailed user input and change tracking
-argument-hint: "task-id [\"text\"|file.md]"
+description: Update task JSON with new requirements or batch-update multiple tasks from verification report, tracks changes in task-changes.json
+argument-hint: "task-id [\"text\"|file.md] | --batch [verification-report.md]"
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 # Task Replan Command (/task:replan)
 
 ## Overview
-Replans individual tasks with multiple input options, change tracking, and version management.
+Replans individual tasks or batch processes multiple tasks with change tracking and backup management.
+
+**Modes**:
+- **Single Task Mode**: Replan one task with specific changes
+- **Batch Mode**: Process multiple tasks from action-plan verification report
 
 ## Core Principles
 **Task System:** @~/.claude/workflows/task-core.md
 
 ## Key Features
-- **Single-Task Focus**: Operates on individual tasks only
-- **Multiple Input Sources**: Text, files, or issue references
-- **Version Tracking**: Backup previous versions
+- **Single/Batch Operations**: Single task or multiple tasks from verification report
+- **Multiple Input Sources**: Text, files, or verification report
+- **Backup Management**: Automatic backup of previous versions
 - **Change Documentation**: Track all modifications
+- **Progress Tracking**: TodoWrite integration for batch operations
 
-⚠️ **CRITICAL**: Validates active session before replanning
+**CRITICAL**: Validates active session before replanning
 
-## Input Sources
+## Operation Modes
 
-### Direct Text (Default)
+### Single Task Mode
+
+#### Direct Text (Default)
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 "Add OAuth2 authentication support"
 ```
 
-### File-based Input
+#### File-based Input
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 updated-specs.md
 ```
 Supports: .md, .txt, .json, .yaml
 
-### Interactive Mode
+#### Interactive Mode
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 --interactive
 ```
 Guided step-by-step modification process with validation
 
+### Batch Mode
+
+#### From Verification Report
+```bash
+/task:replan --batch ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Parse verification report to extract replan recommendations
+2. Create TodoWrite task list for all modifications
+3. Process each task sequentially with confirmation
+4. Track progress and generate summary report
+
+**Auto-detection**: If input file contains "Action Plan Verification Report" header, automatically enters batch mode
+
 ## Replanning Process
 
+### Single Task Process
+
 1. **Load & Validate**: Read task JSON and validate session
 2. **Parse Input**: Process changes from input source
-3. **Backup Version**: Create previous version backup
+3. **Create Backup**: Save previous version to backup folder
 4. **Update Task**: Modify JSON structure and relationships
 5. **Save Changes**: Write updated task and increment version
 6. **Update Session**: Reflect changes in workflow stats
 
-## Version Management
+### Batch Process
 
-### Version Tracking
-Tasks maintain version history:
+1. **Parse Verification Report**: Extract all replan recommendations
+2. **Initialize TodoWrite**: Create task list for tracking
+3. **For Each Task**:
+   - Mark todo as in_progress
+   - Load and validate task JSON
+   - Create backup
+   - Apply recommended changes
+   - Save updated task
+   - Mark todo as completed
+4. **Generate Summary**: Report all changes and backup locations
+
+## Backup Management
+
+### Backup Tracking
+Tasks maintain backup history:
 ```json
 {
   "id": "IMPL-1",
@@ -61,7 +99,8 @@ Tasks maintain version history:
       "version": "1.2",
       "reason": "Add OAuth2 support",
       "input_source": "direct_text",
-      "backup_location": ".task/versions/IMPL-1-v1.1.json"
+      "backup_location": ".task/backup/IMPL-1-v1.1.json",
+      "timestamp": "2025-10-17T10:30:00Z"
     }
   ]
 }
@@ -73,11 +112,15 @@ Tasks maintain version history:
 ```
 .task/
 ├── IMPL-1.json                    # Current version
-├── versions/
-│   └── IMPL-1-v1.1.json          # Previous backup
+├── backup/
+│   ├── IMPL-1-v1.0.json          # Original version
+│   ├── IMPL-1-v1.1.json          # Previous backup
+│   └── IMPL-1-v1.2.json          # Latest backup
 └── [new subtasks as needed]
 ```
 
+**Backup Naming**: `{task-id}-v{version}.json`
+
 ## Implementation Updates
 
 ### Change Detection
@@ -127,18 +170,68 @@ Updates workflow-session.json with:
 /task:replan IMPL-1 --rollback v1.1
 
 Rollback to version 1.1:
-- Restore task from backup
+- Restore task from backup/.../IMPL-1-v1.1.json
 - Remove new subtasks if any
 - Update session stats
 
-Confirm rollback? (y/n): y
+# Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Are you sure you want to roll back this task to a previous version?",
+    header: "Confirm",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Yes, rollback", description: "Restore the task from the selected backup." },
+      { label: "No, cancel", description: "Keep the current version of the task." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
 
-✅ Task rolled back to version 1.1
+User selected: "Yes, rollback"
+
+Task rolled back to version 1.1
+```
+
+## Batch Processing with TodoWrite
+
+### Progress Tracking
+When processing multiple tasks, automatically creates TodoWrite task list:
+
+```markdown
+**Batch Replan Progress**:
+- [x] IMPL-002: Add FR-12 draft saving acceptance criteria
+- [x] IMPL-003: Add FR-14 history tracking acceptance criteria
+- [ ] IMPL-004: Add FR-09 response surface explicit coverage
+- [ ] IMPL-008: Add NFR performance validation steps
+```
+
+### Batch Report
+After completion, generates summary:
+```markdown
+## Batch Replan Summary
+
+**Total Tasks**: 4
+**Successful**: 3
+**Failed**: 1
+**Skipped**: 0
+
+### Changes Made
+- IMPL-002 v1.0 → v1.1: Added FR-12 acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-003 v1.0 → v1.1: Added FR-14 acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-004 v1.0 → v1.1: Added FR-09 explicit coverage
+
+### Backups Created
+- .task/backup/IMPL-002-v1.0.json
+- .task/backup/IMPL-003-v1.0.json
+- .task/backup/IMPL-004-v1.0.json
+
+### Errors
+- IMPL-008: File not found (task may have been renamed)
 ```
 
 ## Examples
 
-### Text Input
+### Single Task - Text Input
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 "Add OAuth2 authentication support"
 
@@ -147,47 +240,193 @@ Proposed updates:
 + Add OAuth2 integration
 + Update authentication flow
 
-Apply changes? (y/n): y
+# Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Do you want to apply these changes to the task?",
+    header: "Apply",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Yes, apply", description: "Create new version with these changes." },
+      { label: "No, cancel", description: "Discard changes and keep current version." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
 
-✓ Version 1.2 created
-✓ Context updated
-✓ Backup saved
+User selected: "Yes, apply"
+
+Version 1.2 created
+Context updated
+Backup saved to .task/backup/IMPL-1-v1.1.json
 ```
 
-### File Input
+### Single Task - File Input
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-2 requirements.md
 
 Loading requirements.md...
 Applying specification changes...
 
-✓ Task updated with new requirements
-✓ Version 1.1 created
+Task updated with new requirements
+Version 1.1 created
+Backup saved to .task/backup/IMPL-2-v1.0.json
+```
+
+### Batch Mode - From Verification Report
+```bash
+/task:replan --batch .workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
+
+Parsing verification report...
+Found 4 tasks requiring replanning:
+- IMPL-002: Add FR-12 draft saving acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-003: Add FR-14 history tracking acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-004: Add FR-09 response surface explicit coverage
+- IMPL-008: Add NFR performance validation steps
+
+Creating task tracking list...
+
+Processing IMPL-002...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-002-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Processing IMPL-003...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-003-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Processing IMPL-004...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-004-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Processing IMPL-008...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-008-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Batch replan completed: 4/4 successful
+Summary report saved
+```
+
+### Batch Mode - Auto-detection
+```bash
+# If file contains "Action Plan Verification Report", auto-enters batch mode
+/task:replan ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
+
+Detected verification report format
+Entering batch mode...
+[same as above]
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling
 
+### Single Task Errors
 ```bash
 # Task not found
-❌ Task IMPL-5 not found
-→ Check task ID with /context
+Task IMPL-5 not found
+Check task ID with /workflow:status
 
 # Task completed
-⚠️ Task IMPL-1 is completed (cannot replan)
-→ Create new task for additional work
+Task IMPL-1 is completed (cannot replan)
+Create new task for additional work
 
 # File not found
-❌ File requirements.md not found
-→ Check file path
+File requirements.md not found
+Check file path
 
 # No input provided
-❌ Please specify changes needed
-→ Provide text, file, or issue reference
+Please specify changes needed
+Provide text, file, or verification report
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
+### Batch Mode Errors
+```bash
+# Invalid verification report
+File does not contain valid verification report format
+Check report structure or use single task mode
 
-- `/context` - View updated task structure
-- `/task:execute` - Execute replanned task
-- `/task:create` - Create new tasks
-- `/workflow:action-plan` - For workflow-wide changes
+# Partial failures
+Batch completed with errors: 3/4 successful
+Review error details in summary report
+
+# No replan recommendations found
+Verification report contains no replan recommendations
+Check report content or use /workflow:action-plan-verify first
+```
+
+## Batch Mode Integration
+
+### Input Format Expectations
+Batch mode parses verification reports looking for:
+
+1. **Required Actions Section**: Commands like `/task:replan IMPL-X "changes"`
+2. **Findings Table**: Task IDs with recommendations
+3. **Next Actions Section**: Specific replan commands
+
+**Example Patterns**:
+```markdown
+#### 1. HIGH Priority - Address FR Coverage Gaps
+/task:replan IMPL-004 "
+Add explicit acceptance criteria:
+- FR-09: Response surface 3D visualization
+"
+
+#### 2. MEDIUM Priority - Enhance NFR Coverage
+/task:replan IMPL-008 "
+Add performance testing:
+- NFR-01: Load test API endpoints
+"
+```
+
+### Extraction Logic
+1. Scan for `/task:replan` commands in report
+2. Extract task ID and change description
+3. Group by priority (HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)
+4. Process in priority order with TodoWrite tracking
+
+### Confirmation Behavior
+- **Default**: Confirm each task before applying
+- **With `--auto-confirm`**: Apply all changes without prompting
+  ```bash
+  /task:replan --batch report.md --auto-confirm
+  ```
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Backup Management
+```typescript
+// Backup file naming convention
+const backupPath = `.task/backup/${taskId}-v${previousVersion}.json`;
+
+// Backup metadata in task JSON
+{
+  "replan_history": [
+    {
+      "version": "1.2",
+      "timestamp": "2025-10-17T10:30:00Z",
+      "reason": "Add FR-09 explicit coverage",
+      "input_source": "batch_verification_report",
+      "backup_location": ".task/backup/IMPL-004-v1.1.json"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Integration
+```typescript
+// Initialize tracking for batch mode
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: taskList.map(task => ({
+    content: `${task.id}: ${task.changeDescription}`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Replanning ${task.id}`
+  }))
+});
+
+// Update progress during processing
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: updateTaskStatus(taskId, "in_progress")
+});
+
+// Mark completed
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: updateTaskStatus(taskId, "completed")
+});
+```

.claude/commands/update-memory-full.md

@@ -1,174 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update-memory-full
-description: Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-full`
-
-Complete project-wide documentation update using depth-parallel execution.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
-- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
-- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/bash
-# Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-
-# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-tool="gemini"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
-
-# Step 2: Code Index architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
-
-# Step 3: Cache git changes
-Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
-
-# Step 4: Get and display project structure
-modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
-count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 5: Analysis handover → Model takes control
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-
-# Pseudocode flow:
-# IF (module_count > 20 OR complex_project_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-# ELSE:
-#     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
-#
-# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to:
-
-1. **Analyze Complexity**: Review module count and project context
-2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**:
-   - Simple projects: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
-4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
-
-### 📋 Execution Strategies
-
-**For Simple Projects (≤20 modules):**
-
-Model will present detailed plan:
-```
-📋 Update Plan:
-  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
-
-  NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
-    - ./src/components/CLAUDE.md
-    - ./src/services/CLAUDE.md
-
-  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
-    - ./CLAUDE.md
-    - ./src/CLAUDE.md
-    - ./tests/CLAUDE.md
-
-  Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed
-
-  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
-```
-
-```pseudo
-# ⚠️ MANDATORY: User confirmation → MUST await explicit approval  
-IF user_explicitly_confirms():
-    continue_execution()
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-
-# Step 4: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
-
-# Step 5: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" "$tool" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-# Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
-non_claude=$(Bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || true))
-if [ -n "$non_claude" ]; then
-    Bash(git restore --staged .)
-    echo "⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified, staging reverted"
-    echo "Modified files: $non_claude"
-else
-    echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified, staging preserved"
-fi
-
-# Step 7: Display changes → Final status
-Bash(git status --short)
-```
-
-**For Complex Projects (>20 modules):**
-
-The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
-
-```javascript
-Task "Complex project full update"
-subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-prompt: `
-CONTEXT:
-- Total modules: ${module_count}
-- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
-- Mode: full
-- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
-- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
-
-MODULE LIST:
-${modules_output}  // Full output from get_modules_by_depth.sh list
-
-REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
-2. Process depths 5→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel jobs per depth
-3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "full" "${tool}" &
-4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
-5. Verify all ${module_count} modules are processed
-6. Run safety check after completion
-7. Display git status
-
-Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules.
-`
-```
-
-**Agent receives complete context:**
-- Module count and tool selection
-- Full structured module list
-- Clear execution requirements
-- Path extraction format
-- Success criteria
-
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Complete project documentation refresh
-/update-memory-full
-
-# After major architectural changes
-/update-memory-full
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Separated Commands**: Each bash operation is a discrete, trackable step
-- **Intelligent Complexity Detection**: Model analyzes project context for optimal strategy
-- **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Same depth modules run in parallel, depths run sequentially
-- **Git Integration**: Auto-cache changes before, safety check and show status after
-- **Safety Protection**: Automatic detection and revert of unintended source code modifications
-- **Module Detection**: Uses get_modules_by_depth.sh for structure discovery
-- **User Confirmation**: Clear plan presentation with approval step
-- **CLAUDE.md Only**: Only updates documentation, never source code

.claude/commands/update-memory-related.md

@@ -1,182 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update-memory-related
-description: Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation updates based on recent changes
-argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-related`
-
-Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
-- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
-- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
-
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/bash
-# Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation update
-
-# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-tool="gemini"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
-
-# Step 2: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-
-# Step 3: Detect changed modules (before staging)
-changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list))
-
-# Step 4: Cache git changes (protect current state)
-Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
-
-# Step 5: Use detected changes or fallback
-if [ -z "$changed" ]; then
-    changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | head -10))
-fi
-count=$(echo "$changed" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 6: Analysis handover → Model takes control
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-
-# Pseudocode flow:
-# IF (change_count > 15 OR complex_changes_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-# ELSE:
-#     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
-#
-# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
-
-1. **Analyze Changes**: Review change count and complexity  
-2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which changed modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**: 
-   - Simple changes: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
-4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated for changed modules
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
-
-### 📋 Execution Strategies
-
-**For Simple Changes (≤15 modules):**
-
-Model will present detailed plan for affected modules:
-```
-📋 Related Update Plan:
-  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
-
-  CHANGED modules affecting CLAUDE.md:
-
-  NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
-    - ./src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-    - ./src/utils/helpers/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-
-  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
-    - ./src/api/CLAUDE.md  [parent of changed auth/]
-    - ./src/CLAUDE.md  [root level]
-
-  Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed for recent changes
-
-  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
-```
-
-```pseudo
-# ⚠️ MANDATORY: User confirmation → MUST await explicit approval
-IF user_explicitly_confirms():
-    continue_execution()
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-
-# Step 4: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(changed_modules)
-
-# Step 5: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" "$tool" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-# Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
-non_claude=$(Bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || true))
-if [ -n "$non_claude" ]; then
-    Bash(git restore --staged .)
-    echo "⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified, staging reverted"
-    echo "Modified files: $non_claude"
-else
-    echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified, staging preserved"
-fi
-
-# Step 7: Display changes → Final status
-Bash(git diff --stat)
-```
-
-**For Complex Changes (>15 modules):**
-
-The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
-
-```javascript
-Task "Complex project related update"
-subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-prompt: `
-CONTEXT:
-- Total modules: ${change_count}
-- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
-- Mode: related
-- Changed modules detected via: detect_changed_modules.sh
-- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
-- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
-
-MODULE LIST:
-${changed_modules_output}  // Full output from detect_changed_modules.sh list
-
-REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
-2. Process depths sequentially (deepest→shallowest), max 4 parallel jobs per depth
-3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "related" "${tool}" &
-4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
-5. Verify all ${change_count} modules are processed
-6. Run safety check after completion
-7. Display git diff --stat
-
-Execute depth-parallel updates for changed modules only.
-`
-```
-
-**Agent receives complete context:**
-- Changed module count and tool selection
-- Full structured module list (changed only)
-- Clear execution requirements with "related" mode
-- Path extraction format
-- Success criteria
-
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Daily development update
-/update-memory-related
-
-# After feature work
-/update-memory-related
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Separated Commands**: Each bash operation is a discrete, trackable step
-- **Intelligent Change Analysis**: Model analyzes change complexity for optimal strategy
-- **Change Detection**: Automatically finds affected modules using git diff
-- **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Same depth modules run in parallel, depths run sequentially  
-- **Git Integration**: Auto-cache changes, show diff statistics after
-- **Fallback Mode**: Updates recent files when no git changes found
-- **User Confirmation**: Clear plan presentation with approval step
-- **CLAUDE.md Only**: Only updates documentation, never source code

.claude/commands/version.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: version
-description: Display version information and check for updates
+description: Display Claude Code version information and check for updates
 allowed-tools: Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -152,12 +152,12 @@ bash(printf "%s\n%s" "3.2.1" "3.2.2" | sort -V | tail -n 1)
 
 **Scenario 1: Up to date**
 ```
-✅ You are on the latest stable version (3.2.1)
+You are on the latest stable version (3.2.1)
 ```
 
 **Scenario 2: Upgrade available**
 ```
-⬆️ A newer stable version is available: v3.2.2
+A newer stable version is available: v3.2.2
 Your version: 3.2.1
 
 To upgrade:
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ Bash: bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-W
 
 **Scenario 3: Development version**
 ```
-✨ You are running a development version (3.4.0-dev)
+You are running a development version (3.4.0-dev)
 This is newer than the latest stable release (v3.3.0)
 ```
 
@@ -252,7 +252,3 @@ ERROR: version.json is invalid or corrupted
 
 ### Timeout Configuration
 All network calls should use `timeout: 30000` (30 seconds) to handle slow connections.
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/cli:cli-init` - Initialize CLI configurations
-- `/workflow:session:list` - List workflow sessions

.claude/commands/workflow/action-plan-verify.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: action-plan-verify
-description: Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis of IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json before execution
+description: Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency analysis between IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs with quality gate validation
 argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
 allowed-tools: Read(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
@@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
 
 ## Goal
 
-Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items between action planning artifacts (`IMPL_PLAN.md`, `task.json`) and brainstorming artifacts (`synthesis-specification.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/workflow:plan` has successfully produced complete `IMPL_PLAN.md` and task JSON files.
+Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items between action planning artifacts (`IMPL_PLAN.md`, `task.json`) and brainstorming artifacts (`role analysis documents`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/workflow:plan` has successfully produced complete `IMPL_PLAN.md` and task JSON files.
 
 ## Operating Constraints
 
 **STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands).
 
-**Synthesis Authority**: The `synthesis-specification.md` is **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
+**Synthesis Authority**: The `role analysis documents` is **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
 
 ## Execution Steps
 
@@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
 task_dir = session_dir/.task
 
 # Validate required artifacts
-SYNTHESIS = brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
+SYNTHESIS = brainstorm_dir/role analysis documents
 IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
 TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
 
 # Abort if missing
 IF NOT EXISTS(SYNTHESIS):
-    ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
+    ERROR: "role analysis documents not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
     EXIT
 
 IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
@@ -67,7 +67,12 @@ IF TASK_FILES.count == 0:
 
 Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
 
-**From synthesis-specification.md**:
+**From workflow-session.json** (NEW - PRIMARY REFERENCE):
+- Original user prompt/intent (project or description field)
+- User's stated goals and objectives
+- User's scope definition
+
+**From role analysis documents**:
 - Functional Requirements (IDs, descriptions, acceptance criteria)
 - Non-Functional Requirements (IDs, targets)
 - Business Requirements (IDs, success metrics)
@@ -117,7 +122,14 @@ Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
 
 Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
 
-#### A. Requirements Coverage Analysis
+#### A. User Intent Alignment (NEW - CRITICAL)
+
+- **Goal Alignment**: IMPL_PLAN objectives match user's original intent
+- **Scope Drift**: Plan covers user's stated scope without unauthorized expansion
+- **Success Criteria Match**: Plan's success criteria reflect user's expectations
+- **Intent Conflicts**: Tasks contradicting user's original objectives
+
+#### B. Requirements Coverage Analysis
 
 - **Orphaned Requirements**: Requirements in synthesis with zero associated tasks
 - **Unmapped Tasks**: Tasks with no clear requirement linkage
@@ -167,6 +179,7 @@ Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder i
 Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
 
 - **CRITICAL**:
+  - Violates user's original intent (goal misalignment, scope drift)
   - Violates synthesis authority (requirement conflict)
   - Core requirement with zero coverage
   - Circular dependencies
@@ -197,7 +210,7 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 **Session**: WFS-{session-id}
 **Generated**: {timestamp}
-**Artifacts Analyzed**: synthesis-specification.md, IMPL_PLAN.md, {N} task files
+**Artifacts Analyzed**: role analysis documents, IMPL_PLAN.md, {N} task files
 
 ---
 
@@ -229,10 +242,10 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 | Requirement ID | Requirement Summary | Has Task? | Task IDs | Priority Match | Notes |
 |----------------|---------------------|-----------|----------|----------------|-------|
-| FR-01 | User authentication | ✅ Yes | IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2 | ✅ Match | Complete |
-| FR-02 | Data export | ✅ Yes | IMPL-2.3 | ⚠️ Mismatch | High req → Med priority task |
-| FR-03 | Profile management | ❌ No | - | - | **CRITICAL: Zero coverage** |
-| NFR-01 | Response time <200ms | ❌ No | - | - | **HIGH: No performance tasks** |
+| FR-01 | User authentication | Yes | IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2 | Match | Complete |
+| FR-02 | Data export | Yes | IMPL-2.3 | Mismatch | High req → Med priority task |
+| FR-03 | Profile management | No | - | - | **CRITICAL: Zero coverage** |
+| NFR-01 | Response time <200ms | No | - | - | **HIGH: No performance tasks** |
 
 **Coverage Metrics**:
 - Functional Requirements: 85% (17/20 covered)
@@ -251,7 +264,7 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 ### Dependency Graph Issues
 
-**Circular Dependencies**: None detected ✅
+**Circular Dependencies**: None detected
 
 **Broken Dependencies**:
 - IMPL-2.3 depends on "IMPL-2.4" (non-existent)
@@ -307,111 +320,98 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 ### Next Actions
 
-#### If CRITICAL Issues Exist (Current Status: 2 CRITICAL)
-**Recommendation**: ❌ **BLOCK EXECUTION** - Resolve CRITICAL issues before proceeding
+#### Action Recommendations
 
-**Required Actions**:
-1. **CRITICAL**: Add authentication implementation tasks to cover FR-03
-2. **CRITICAL**: Add performance optimization tasks to cover NFR-01
+**If CRITICAL Issues Exist**:
+- **BLOCK EXECUTION** - Resolve critical issues before proceeding
+- Use TodoWrite to track all required fixes
+- Fix broken dependencies and circular references
 
-#### If Only HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW Issues
-**Recommendation**: ⚠️ **PROCEED WITH CAUTION** - Issues are non-blocking but should be addressed
+**If Only HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW Issues**:
+- **PROCEED WITH CAUTION** - Fix high-priority issues first
+- Use TodoWrite to systematically track and complete all improvements
 
-**Suggested Improvements**:
-1. Add context.artifacts references to all tasks (use /task:replan)
-2. Fix broken dependency IMPL-2.3 → IMPL-2.4
-3. Add flow_control.target_files to underspecified tasks
+#### TodoWrite-Based Remediation Workflow
 
-#### Command Suggestions
+**Report Location**: `.workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`
+
+**Recommended Workflow**:
+1. **Create TodoWrite Task List**: Extract all findings from report
+2. **Process by Priority**: CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM → LOW
+3. **Complete Each Fix**: Mark tasks as in_progress/completed as you work
+4. **Validate Changes**: Verify each modification against requirements
+
+**TodoWrite Task Structure Example**:
+```markdown
+Priority Order:
+1. Fix coverage gaps (CRITICAL)
+2. Resolve consistency conflicts (CRITICAL/HIGH)
+3. Add missing specifications (MEDIUM)
+4. Improve task quality (LOW)
+```
+
+**Notes**:
+- TodoWrite provides real-time progress tracking
+- Each finding becomes a trackable todo item
+- User can monitor progress throughout remediation
+- Architecture drift in IMPL_PLAN requires manual editing
+```
+
+### 7. Save Report and Execute TodoWrite-Based Remediation
+
+**Save Analysis Report**:
 ```bash
-# Fix critical coverage gaps
-/task:create "Implement user authentication (FR-03)"
-/task:create "Add performance optimization (NFR-01)"
-
-# Refine existing tasks
-/task:replan IMPL-1.2 "Add context.artifacts and target_files"
-
-# Update IMPL_PLAN if architecture drift detected
-# (Manual edit required)
-```
+report_path = ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
+Write(report_path, full_report_content)
 ```
 
-### 7. Provide Remediation Options
+**After Report Generation**:
 
-At end of report, ask the user:
+1. **Extract Findings**: Parse all issues by severity
+2. **Create TodoWrite Task List**: Convert findings to actionable todos
+3. **Execute Fixes**: Process each todo systematically
+4. **Update Task Files**: Apply modifications directly to task JSON files
+5. **Update IMPL_PLAN**: Apply strategic changes if needed
+
+At end of report, provide remediation guidance:
 
 ```markdown
-### 🔧 Remediation Options
+### 🔧 Remediation Workflow
 
-Would you like me to:
-1. **Generate task suggestions** for unmapped requirements (no auto-creation)
-2. **Provide specific edit commands** for top N issues (you execute manually)
-3. **Create remediation checklist** for systematic fixing
+**Recommended Approach**:
+1. **Initialize TodoWrite**: Create comprehensive task list from all findings
+2. **Process by Severity**: Start with CRITICAL, then HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW
+3. **Apply Fixes Directly**: Modify task.json files and IMPL_PLAN.md as needed
+4. **Track Progress**: Mark todos as completed after each fix
 
-(Do NOT apply fixes automatically - this is read-only analysis)
+**TodoWrite Execution Pattern**:
+```bash
+# Step 1: Create task list from verification report
+TodoWrite([
+  { content: "Fix FR-03 coverage gap - add authentication task", status: "pending", activeForm: "Fixing FR-03 coverage gap" },
+  { content: "Fix IMPL-1.2 consistency - align with ADR-02", status: "pending", activeForm: "Fixing IMPL-1.2 consistency" },
+  { content: "Add context.artifacts to IMPL-1.2", status: "pending", activeForm: "Adding context.artifacts to IMPL-1.2" },
+  # ... additional todos for each finding
+])
+
+# Step 2: Process each todo systematically
+# Mark as in_progress when starting
+# Apply fix using Read/Edit tools
+# Mark as completed when done
+# Move to next priority item
 ```
 
-### 8. Update Session Metadata
+**File Modification Workflow**:
+```bash
+# For task JSON modifications:
+1. Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.task/IMPL-X.Y.json)
+2. Edit() to apply fixes
+3. Mark todo as completed
 
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "PLAN": {
-      "status": "completed",
-      "action_plan_verification": {
-        "completed": true,
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "overall_risk_level": "HIGH",
-        "recommendation": "PROCEED_WITH_FIXES",
-        "issues": {
-          "critical": 2,
-          "high": 5,
-          "medium": 8,
-          "low": 3
-        },
-        "coverage": {
-          "functional_requirements": 0.85,
-          "non_functional_requirements": 0.40,
-          "business_requirements": 1.00
-        },
-        "report_path": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
+# For IMPL_PLAN modifications:
+1. Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/IMPL_PLAN.md)
+2. Edit() to apply strategic changes
+3. Mark todo as completed
 ```
 
-## Operating Principles
-
-### Context Efficiency
-- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings
-- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
-- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
-- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent IDs and counts
-
-### Analysis Guidelines
-- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
-- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
-- **Prioritize synthesis violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
-- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances)
-- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
-
-### Verification Taxonomy
-- **Coverage**: Requirements → Tasks mapping
-- **Consistency**: Cross-artifact alignment
-- **Dependencies**: Task ordering and relationships
-- **Synthesis Alignment**: Adherence to authoritative requirements
-- **Task Quality**: Specification completeness
-- **Feasibility**: Implementation risks
-
-## Behavior Rules
-
-- **If no issues found**: Report "✅ Action plan verification passed. No issues detected." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:execute`.
-- **If CRITICAL issues exist**: Recommend blocking execution until resolved.
-- **If only HIGH/MEDIUM issues**: User may proceed with caution, but provide improvement suggestions.
-- **If IMPL_PLAN.md or task files missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:plan` first.
-- **Always provide actionable remediation suggestions**: Don't just identify problems—suggest solutions.
-
-## Context
-
-{ARGS}
+**Note**: All fixes execute immediately after user confirmation without additional commands.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/api-designer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,585 @@
+---
+name: api-designer
+description: Generate or update api-designer/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for API design perspective
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🔌 **API Designer Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating api-designer/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from backend API design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
+- **API Design Focus**: RESTful/GraphQL API design, endpoint structure, and contract definition
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **API Architecture**: RESTful/GraphQL design patterns and best practices
+- **Endpoint Design**: Resource modeling, URL structure, and HTTP method selection
+- **Data Contracts**: Request/response schemas, validation rules, and data transformation
+- **API Documentation**: OpenAPI/Swagger specifications and developer experience
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (API Contract Within Architectural Framework)**
+- **API Contract Definition**: Specific endpoint paths, HTTP methods, and status codes
+- **Resource Modeling**: Mapping domain entities to RESTful resources or GraphQL types
+- **Request/Response Schemas**: Detailed data contracts, validation rules, and error formats
+- **API Versioning Strategy**: Version management, deprecation policies, and migration paths
+- **Developer Experience**: API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger), code examples, and SDKs
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **System Architecture Decisions**: Microservices vs monolithic, overall communication patterns → Defers to **System Architect**
+- **Canonical Data Model**: Underlying data schemas and entity relationships → Defers to **Data Architect**
+- **UI/Frontend Integration**: How clients consume the API → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **FROM System Architect**: Receives architectural constraints (REST vs GraphQL, sync vs async) that define the design space
+- **FROM Data Architect**: Receives canonical data model and translates it into public API data contracts (as projection/view)
+- **TO Frontend Teams**: Provides complete API specifications, documentation, and integration guides
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Check existing analysis
+CHECK: brainstorm_dir/api-designer/analysis.md
+IF EXISTS:
+    SHOW existing analysis summary
+    ASK: "Analysis exists. Do you want to:"
+    OPTIONS:
+      1. "Update with new insights" → Update existing
+      2. "Replace completely" → Generate new
+      3. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+ELSE:
+    CREATE new analysis
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Task Generation
+**Framework-Based Analysis** (when guidance-specification.md exists):
+```bash
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     prompt="Generate API designer analysis addressing topic framework
+
+     ## Framework Integration Required
+     **MANDATORY**: Load and address guidance-specification.md discussion points
+     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
+     **Output Location**: {session.brainstorm_dir}/api-designer/analysis.md
+
+     ## Analysis Requirements
+     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read guidance-specification.md completely
+     2. **Address Each Discussion Point**: Respond to all 5 framework sections from API design perspective
+     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../guidance-specification.md
+     4. **API Design Focus**: Emphasize endpoint structure, data contracts, versioning strategies
+     5. **Structured Response**: Use framework structure for analysis organization
+
+     ## Framework Sections to Address
+     - Core Requirements (from API design perspective)
+     - Technical Considerations (detailed API architecture analysis)
+     - User Experience Factors (developer experience and API usability)
+     - Implementation Challenges (API design risks and solutions)
+     - Success Metrics (API performance metrics and adoption tracking)
+
+     ## Output Structure Required
+     ```markdown
+     # API Designer Analysis: [Topic]
+
+     **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md
+     **Role Focus**: Backend API Design and Contract Definition
+
+     ## Core Requirements Analysis
+     [Address framework requirements from API design perspective]
+
+     ## Technical Considerations
+     [Detailed API architecture and endpoint design analysis]
+
+     ## Developer Experience Factors
+     [API usability, documentation, and integration ease]
+
+     ## Implementation Challenges
+     [API design risks and mitigation strategies]
+
+     ## Success Metrics
+     [API performance metrics, adoption rates, and developer satisfaction]
+
+     ## API Design-Specific Recommendations
+     [Detailed API design recommendations and best practices]
+     ```",
+     description="Generate API designer framework-based analysis")
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update Mechanism
+**Analysis Update Process**:
+```bash
+# For existing analysis updates
+IF update_mode = "incremental":
+    Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         prompt="Update existing API designer analysis
+
+         ## Current Analysis Context
+         **Existing Analysis**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/api-designer/analysis.md
+         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
+
+         ## Update Requirements
+         1. **Preserve Structure**: Maintain existing analysis structure
+         2. **Add New Insights**: Integrate new API design insights and recommendations
+         3. **Framework Alignment**: Ensure continued alignment with topic framework
+         4. **API Updates**: Add new endpoint patterns, versioning strategies, documentation improvements
+         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../guidance-specification.md reference
+
+         ## Update Instructions
+         - Read existing analysis completely
+         - Identify areas for enhancement or new insights
+         - Add API design depth while preserving original structure
+         - Update recommendations with new API design patterns and approaches
+         - Maintain framework discussion point addressing",
+         description="Update API designer analysis incrementally")
+```
+
+## Document Structure
+
+### Output Files
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
+├── guidance-specification.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
+└── api-designer/
+    └── analysis.md            # ★ OUTPUT: Framework-based analysis
+```
+
+### Analysis Structure
+**Required Elements**:
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md (if framework exists)
+- **Role Focus**: Backend API Design and Contract Definition perspective
+- **5 Framework Sections**: Address each framework discussion point
+- **API Design Recommendations**: Endpoint-specific insights and solutions
+
+## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
+
+### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
+Session detection and selection:
+```bash
+# Check for active sessions
+active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
+if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
+  prompt_user_to_select_session()
+else
+  use_existing_or_create_new()
+fi
+```
+
+### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
+**API Designer Perspective Questioning**
+
+Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive API design context:
+
+#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
+1. **API Type & Architecture**
+   - RESTful, GraphQL, or hybrid API approach?
+   - Synchronous vs asynchronous communication patterns?
+   - Real-time requirements (WebSocket, Server-Sent Events)?
+
+2. **Resource Modeling & Endpoints**
+   - What are the core domain resources/entities?
+   - Expected CRUD operations for each resource?
+   - Complex query requirements (filtering, sorting, pagination)?
+
+3. **Data Contracts & Validation**
+   - Request/response data format requirements (JSON, XML, Protocol Buffers)?
+   - Input validation and sanitization requirements?
+   - Data transformation and mapping needs?
+
+4. **API Management & Governance**
+   - API versioning strategy requirements?
+   - Authentication and authorization mechanisms?
+   - Rate limiting and throttling requirements?
+   - API documentation and developer portal needs?
+
+5. **Integration & Compatibility**
+   - Client platforms consuming the API (web, mobile, third-party)?
+   - Backward compatibility requirements?
+   - External API integrations needed?
+
+#### Context Validation
+- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
+- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
+- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/api-designer-context.md`
+
+### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
+**Dedicated Agent Execution**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute dedicated api-designer conceptual analysis for: {topic}
+
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: api-designer
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/api-designer/
+USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
+
+Flow Control Steps:
+[
+  {
+    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
+    \"action\": \"Load api-designer planning template\",
+    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/api-designer.md))\",
+    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
+  }
+]
+
+Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
+- Apply api-designer perspective to topic analysis
+- Focus on endpoint design, data contracts, and API governance
+- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
+- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
+- Address all user context from questioning phase
+
+Deliverables:
+- analysis.md: Main API design analysis
+- api-specification.md: Detailed endpoint specifications
+- data-contracts.md: Request/response schemas and validation rules
+- api-documentation.md: API documentation strategy and templates
+
+Embody api-designer role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
+```
+
+### Progress Tracking
+TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Gather API designer context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
+  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to api-designer-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
+  {"content": "Load api-designer planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
+  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for api-designer role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
+]
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Specification**
+
+### Output Location
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/api-designer/
+├── analysis.md                 # Primary API design analysis
+├── api-specification.md        # Detailed endpoint specifications (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+├── data-contracts.md           # Request/response schemas and validation rules
+├── versioning-strategy.md      # API versioning and backward compatibility plan
+└── developer-guide.md          # API usage documentation and integration examples
+```
+
+### Document Templates
+
+#### analysis.md Structure
+```markdown
+# API Design Analysis: {Topic}
+*Generated: {timestamp}*
+
+## Executive Summary
+[Key API design findings and recommendations overview]
+
+## API Architecture Overview
+### API Type Selection (REST/GraphQL/Hybrid)
+### Communication Patterns
+### Authentication & Authorization Strategy
+
+## Resource Modeling
+### Core Domain Resources
+### Resource Relationships
+### URL Structure and Naming Conventions
+
+## Endpoint Design
+### Resource Endpoints
+- GET /api/v1/resources
+- POST /api/v1/resources
+- GET /api/v1/resources/{id}
+- PUT /api/v1/resources/{id}
+- DELETE /api/v1/resources/{id}
+
+### Query Parameters
+- Filtering: ?filter[field]=value
+- Sorting: ?sort=field,-field2
+- Pagination: ?page=1&limit=20
+
+### HTTP Methods and Status Codes
+- Success responses (2xx)
+- Client errors (4xx)
+- Server errors (5xx)
+
+## Data Contracts
+### Request Schemas
+[JSON Schema or OpenAPI definitions]
+
+### Response Schemas
+[JSON Schema or OpenAPI definitions]
+
+### Validation Rules
+- Required fields
+- Data types and formats
+- Business logic constraints
+
+## API Versioning Strategy
+### Versioning Approach (URL/Header/Accept)
+### Version Lifecycle Management
+### Deprecation Policy
+### Migration Paths
+
+## Security & Governance
+### Authentication Mechanisms
+- OAuth 2.0 / JWT / API Keys
+### Authorization Patterns
+- RBAC / ABAC / Resource-based
+### Rate Limiting & Throttling
+### CORS and Security Headers
+
+## Error Handling
+### Standard Error Response Format
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "ERROR_CODE",
+    "message": "Human-readable error message",
+    "details": [],
+    "trace_id": "uuid"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Error Code Taxonomy
+### Validation Error Responses
+
+## API Documentation
+### OpenAPI/Swagger Specification
+### Developer Portal Requirements
+### Code Examples and SDKs
+### Changelog and Migration Guides
+
+## Performance Optimization
+### Response Caching Strategies
+### Compression (gzip, brotli)
+### Field Selection (sparse fieldsets)
+### Bulk Operations and Batch Endpoints
+
+## Monitoring & Observability
+### API Metrics
+- Request count, latency, error rates
+- Endpoint usage analytics
+### Logging Strategy
+### Distributed Tracing
+
+## Developer Experience
+### API Usability Assessment
+### Integration Complexity
+### SDK and Client Library Needs
+### Sandbox and Testing Environments
+```
+
+#### api-specification.md Structure
+```markdown
+# API Specification: {Topic}
+*OpenAPI 3.0 Specification*
+
+## API Information
+- **Title**: {API Name}
+- **Version**: 1.0.0
+- **Base URL**: https://api.example.com/v1
+- **Contact**: api-team@example.com
+
+## Endpoints
+
+### Users API
+
+#### GET /users
+**Description**: Retrieve a list of users
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `page` (query, integer): Page number (default: 1)
+- `limit` (query, integer): Items per page (default: 20, max: 100)
+- `sort` (query, string): Sort field (e.g., "created_at", "-updated_at")
+- `filter[status]` (query, string): Filter by user status
+
+**Response 200**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": [
+    {
+      "id": "uuid",
+      "username": "string",
+      "email": "string",
+      "created_at": "2025-10-15T00:00:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "meta": {
+    "page": 1,
+    "limit": 20,
+    "total": 100
+  },
+  "links": {
+    "self": "/users?page=1",
+    "next": "/users?page=2",
+    "prev": null
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### POST /users
+**Description**: Create a new user
+
+**Request Body**:
+```json
+{
+  "username": "string (required, 3-50 chars)",
+  "email": "string (required, valid email)",
+  "password": "string (required, min 8 chars)",
+  "profile": {
+    "first_name": "string (optional)",
+    "last_name": "string (optional)"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Response 201**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": {
+    "id": "uuid",
+    "username": "string",
+    "email": "string",
+    "created_at": "2025-10-15T00:00:00Z"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Response 400** (Validation Error):
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
+    "message": "Request validation failed",
+    "details": [
+      {
+        "field": "email",
+        "message": "Invalid email format"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+[Continue for all endpoints...]
+
+## Authentication
+
+### OAuth 2.0 Flow
+1. Client requests authorization
+2. User grants permission
+3. Client receives access token
+4. Client uses token in requests
+
+**Header Format**:
+```
+Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
+```
+
+## Rate Limiting
+
+**Headers**:
+- `X-RateLimit-Limit`: 1000
+- `X-RateLimit-Remaining`: 999
+- `X-RateLimit-Reset`: 1634270400
+
+**Response 429** (Too Many Requests):
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED",
+    "message": "API rate limit exceeded",
+    "retry_after": 3600
+  }
+}
+```
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Status Synchronization
+Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "BRAINSTORM": {
+      "api_designer": {
+        "status": "completed",
+        "completed_at": "timestamp",
+        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/api-designer/",
+        "key_insights": ["endpoint_design", "versioning_strategy", "data_contracts"]
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Cross-Role Collaboration
+API designer perspective provides:
+- **API Contract Specifications** → Frontend Developer
+- **Data Schema Requirements** → Data Architect
+- **Security Requirements** → Security Expert
+- **Integration Endpoints** → System Architect
+- **Performance Constraints** → DevOps Engineer
+
+## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
+
+### Required Analysis Elements
+- [ ] Complete endpoint inventory with HTTP methods and paths
+- [ ] Detailed request/response schemas with validation rules
+- [ ] Clear versioning strategy and backward compatibility plan
+- [ ] Comprehensive error handling and status code usage
+- [ ] API documentation strategy (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+
+### API Design Principles
+- [ ] **Consistency**: Uniform naming conventions and patterns across all endpoints
+- [ ] **Simplicity**: Intuitive resource modeling and URL structures
+- [ ] **Flexibility**: Support for filtering, sorting, pagination, and field selection
+- [ ] **Security**: Proper authentication, authorization, and input validation
+- [ ] **Performance**: Caching strategies, compression, and efficient data structures
+
+### Developer Experience Validation
+- [ ] API is self-documenting with clear endpoint descriptions
+- [ ] Error messages are actionable and helpful for debugging
+- [ ] Response formats are consistent and predictable
+- [ ] Code examples and integration guides are provided
+- [ ] Sandbox environment available for testing
+
+### Technical Completeness
+- [ ] **Resource Modeling**: All domain entities mapped to API resources
+- [ ] **CRUD Coverage**: Complete create, read, update, delete operations
+- [ ] **Query Capabilities**: Advanced filtering, sorting, and search functionality
+- [ ] **Versioning**: Clear version management and migration paths
+- [ ] **Monitoring**: API metrics, logging, and tracing strategies defined
+
+### Integration Readiness
+- [ ] **Client Compatibility**: API works with all target client platforms
+- [ ] **External Integration**: Third-party API dependencies identified
+- [ ] **Backward Compatibility**: Changes don't break existing clients
+- [ ] **Migration Path**: Clear upgrade paths for API consumers
+- [ ] **SDK Support**: Client libraries and code generation considered

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/artifacts.md

@@ -1,366 +1,605 @@
 ---
 name: artifacts
-description: Generate role-specific topic-framework.md dynamically based on selected roles
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for framework generation"
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
+description: Interactive clarification generating confirmed guidance specification through role-based analysis and synthesis
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description [--count N]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
-# Topic Framework Generator Command
+## Overview
 
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>" [--roles "role1,role2,role3"]
+Six-phase workflow: **Automatic project context collection** → Extract topic challenges → Select roles → Generate task-specific questions → Detect conflicts → Generate confirmed guidance (declarative statements only).
+
+**Input**: `"GOAL: [objective] SCOPE: [boundaries] CONTEXT: [background]" [--count N]`
+**Output**: `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md` (CONFIRMED/SELECTED format)
+**Core Principle**: Questions dynamically generated from project context + topic keywords/challenges, NOT from generic templates
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `topic` (required): Topic or challenge description (structured format recommended)
+- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles user WANTS to select (system will recommend N+2 options for user to choose from, default: 3)
+
+## Task Tracking
+
+**⚠️ TodoWrite Rule**: EXTEND auto-parallel's task list (NOT replace/overwrite)
+
+**When called from auto-parallel**:
+- Find the artifacts parent task: "Execute artifacts command for interactive framework generation"
+- Mark parent task as "in_progress"
+- APPEND artifacts sub-tasks AFTER the parent task (Phase 0-5)
+- Mark each sub-task as it completes
+- When Phase 5 completes, mark parent task as "completed"
+- **PRESERVE all other auto-parallel tasks** (role agents, synthesis)
+
+**Standalone Mode**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Initialize session (.workflow/.active-* check, parse --count parameter)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Automatic project context collection (call context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 0 context collection"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Extract challenges, output 2-4 task-specific questions, wait for user input", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 1 topic analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Recommend count+2 roles, output role selection, wait for user input", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 2 role selection"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Generate 3-4 questions per role, output and wait for answers (max 10 per round)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 3 role questions"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Detect conflicts, output clarifications, wait for answers (max 10 per round)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4 conflict resolution"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: Transform Q&A to declarative statements, write guidance-specification.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 5 document generation"}
+]
 ```
 
-## Purpose
-**Generate dynamic topic-framework.md tailored to selected roles**. Creates role-specific discussion frameworks that address relevant perspectives. If no roles specified, generates comprehensive framework covering common analysis areas.
+## User Interaction Protocol
 
-## Role-Based Framework Generation
+### Question Output Format
 
-**Dynamic Generation**: Framework content adapts based on selected roles
-- **With roles**: Generate targeted discussion points for specified roles only
-- **Without roles**: Generate comprehensive framework covering all common areas
+All questions output as structured text (detailed format with descriptions):
 
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Topic Framework Generation Process
-
-**Phase 1: Session Management** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **Active session detection**: Check `.workflow/.active-*` markers
-- **Session selection**: Prompt user if multiple active sessions found
-- **Auto-creation**: Create `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Framework check**: Check if `topic-framework.md` exists (update vs create mode)
-
-**Phase 2: Role Analysis** ⚠️ NEW
-- **Parse roles parameter**: Extract roles from `--roles "role1,role2,role3"` if provided
-- **Role validation**: Verify each role is valid (matches available role commands)
-- **Store role list**: Save selected roles to session metadata for reference
-- **Default behavior**: If no roles specified, use comprehensive coverage
-
-**Phase 3: Dynamic Topic Analysis**
-- **Scope definition**: Define topic boundaries and objectives
-- **Stakeholder identification**: Identify key users and stakeholders based on selected roles
-- **Requirements gathering**: Extract requirements relevant to selected roles
-- **Context collection**: Gather context appropriate for role perspectives
-
-**Phase 4: Role-Specific Framework Generation**
-- **Discussion points creation**: Generate 3-5 discussion areas **tailored to selected roles**
-- **Role-targeted questions**: Create questions specifically for chosen roles
-- **Framework document**: Generate `topic-framework.md` with role-specific sections
-- **Validation check**: Ensure framework addresses all selected role perspectives
-
-**Phase 5: Metadata Storage**
-- **Save role assignment**: Store selected roles in session metadata
-- **Framework versioning**: Track which roles framework addresses
-- **Update tracking**: Maintain role evolution if framework updated
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Discussion-Driven Analysis
-**Interactive Approach**: Direct conversation and exploration without predefined role constraints
-
-**Process Flow**:
-1. **Topic introduction**: Understanding scope and context
-2. **Exploratory questioning**: Open-ended investigation
-3. **Component identification**: Breaking down into manageable pieces
-4. **Relationship analysis**: Understanding connections and dependencies
-5. **Documentation generation**: Structured capture of insights
-
-**Key Areas of Investigation**:
-- **Functional aspects**: What the topic needs to accomplish
-- **Technical considerations**: Implementation constraints and requirements
-- **User perspectives**: How different stakeholders are affected
-- **Business implications**: Cost, timeline, and strategic considerations
-- **Risk assessment**: Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
-
-### Document Generation Standards
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **discussion-summary.md**: Main conversation points and key insights
-- **component-analysis.md**: Detailed breakdown of topic components
-
-## Document Generation
-
-**Primary Output**: Single structured `topic-framework.md` document
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
-└── topic-framework.md          # ★ STRUCTURED FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT
-```
-
-**Note**: `workflow-session.json` is located at `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/workflow-session.json` (session root), not inside `.brainstorming/`.
-
-## Framework Template Structures
-
-### Dynamic Role-Based Framework
-
-Framework content adapts based on `--roles` parameter:
-
-#### Option 1: Specific Roles Provided
 ```markdown
-# [Topic] - Discussion Framework
+【问题{N} - {短标签}】{问题文本}
+a) {选项标签}
+   说明：{选项说明和影响}
+b) {选项标签}
+   说明：{选项说明和影响}
+c) {选项标签}
+   说明：{选项说明和影响}
 
-## Topic Overview
-- **Scope**: [Topic boundaries relevant to selected roles]
-- **Objectives**: [Goals from perspective of selected roles]
-- **Context**: [Background focusing on role-specific concerns]
-- **Target Roles**: ui-designer, system-architect, subject-matter-expert
-
-## Role-Specific Discussion Points
-
-### For UI Designer
-1. **User Interface Requirements**
-   - What interface components are needed?
-   - What user interactions must be supported?
-   - What visual design considerations apply?
-
-2. **User Experience Challenges**
-   - What are the key user journeys?
-   - What accessibility requirements exist?
-   - How to balance aesthetics with functionality?
-
-### For System Architect
-1. **Architecture Decisions**
-   - What architectural patterns fit this solution?
-   - What scalability requirements exist?
-   - How does this integrate with existing systems?
-
-2. **Technical Implementation**
-   - What technology stack is appropriate?
-   - What are the performance requirements?
-   - What dependencies must be managed?
-
-### For Subject Matter Expert
-1. **Domain Expertise & Standards**
-   - What industry standards and best practices apply?
-   - What regulatory compliance requirements exist?
-   - What domain-specific patterns should be followed?
-
-2. **Technical Quality & Risk**
-   - What technical debt considerations exist?
-   - What scalability and maintenance implications apply?
-   - What knowledge transfer and documentation is needed?
-
-## Cross-Role Integration Points
-- How do UI decisions impact architecture?
-- How does architecture constrain UI possibilities?
-- What domain standards affect both UI and architecture?
-
-## Framework Usage
-**For Role Agents**: Address your specific section + integration points
-**Reference Format**: @../topic-framework.md in your analysis.md
-**Update Process**: Use /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts to update
-
----
-*Generated for roles: ui-designer, system-architect, subject-matter-expert*
-*Last updated: [timestamp]*
+请回答：{N}a 或 {N}b 或 {N}c
 ```
 
-#### Option 2: No Roles Specified (Comprehensive)
+**Multi-select format** (Phase 2 role selection):
 ```markdown
-# [Topic] - Discussion Framework
+【角色选择】请选择 {count} 个角色参与头脑风暴分析
 
-## Topic Overview
-- **Scope**: [Comprehensive topic boundaries]
-- **Objectives**: [All-encompassing goals]
-- **Context**: [Full background and constraints]
-- **Stakeholders**: [All relevant parties]
+a) {role-name} ({中文名})
+   推荐理由：{基于topic的相关性说明}
+b) {role-name} ({中文名})
+   推荐理由：{基于topic的相关性说明}
+...
 
-## Core Discussion Areas
+支持格式：
+- 分别选择：2a 2c 2d (选择第2题的a、c、d选项)
+- 合并语法：2acd (选择a、c、d)
+- 逗号分隔：2a,c,d
 
-### 1. Requirements & Objectives
-- What are the fundamental requirements?
-- What are the critical success factors?
-- What constraints must be considered?
-
-### 2. Technical & Architecture
-- What are the technical challenges?
-- What architectural decisions are needed?
-- What integration points exist?
-
-### 3. User Experience & Design
-- Who are the primary users?
-- What are the key user journeys?
-- What usability requirements exist?
-
-### 4. Security & Compliance
-- What security requirements exist?
-- What compliance considerations apply?
-- What data protection is needed?
-
-### 5. Implementation & Operations
-- What are the implementation risks?
-- What resources are required?
-- How will this be maintained?
-
-## Available Role Perspectives
-Framework supports analysis from any of these roles:
-- **Technical**: system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **Product & Design**: ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile & Quality**: scrum-master, test-strategist
-
----
-*Comprehensive framework - adaptable to any role*
-*Last updated: [timestamp]*
+请输入选择：
 ```
 
-## Role-Specific Content Generation
+### Input Parsing Rules
 
-### Available Roles and Their Focus Areas
+**Supported formats** (intelligent parsing):
 
-**Technical Roles**:
-- `system-architect`: Architecture patterns, scalability, technology stack, integration
-- `data-architect`: Data modeling, processing workflows, analytics, storage
-- `subject-matter-expert`: Domain expertise, industry standards, compliance, best practices
+1. **Space-separated**: `1a 2b 3c` → Q1:a, Q2:b, Q3:c
+2. **Comma-separated**: `1a,2b,3c` → Q1:a, Q2:b, Q3:c
+3. **Multi-select combined**: `2abc` → Q2: options a,b,c
+4. **Multi-select spaces**: `2 a b c` → Q2: options a,b,c
+5. **Multi-select comma**: `2a,b,c` → Q2: options a,b,c
+6. **Natural language**: `问题1选a` → 1a (fallback parsing)
 
-**Product & Design Roles**:
-- `ui-designer`: User interface, visual design, interaction patterns, accessibility
-- `ux-expert`: User experience optimization, usability testing, interaction design, design systems
-- `product-manager`: Business value, feature prioritization, market positioning, roadmap
-- `product-owner`: Backlog management, user stories, acceptance criteria, stakeholder alignment
+**Parsing algorithm**:
+- Extract question numbers and option letters
+- Validate question numbers match output
+- Validate option letters exist for each question
+- If ambiguous/invalid, output example format and request re-input
 
-**Agile & Quality Roles**:
-- `scrum-master`: Sprint planning, team dynamics, process optimization, delivery management
-- `test-strategist`: Testing strategies, quality assurance, test automation, validation approaches
+**Error handling** (lenient):
+- Recognize common variations automatically
+- If parsing fails, show example and wait for clarification
+- Support re-input without penalty
 
-### Dynamic Discussion Point Generation
+### Batching Strategy
 
-**For each selected role, generate**:
-1. **2-3 core discussion areas** specific to that role's perspective
-2. **3-5 targeted questions** per discussion area
-3. **Cross-role integration points** showing how roles interact
+**Batch limits**:
+- **Default**: Maximum 10 questions per round
+- **Phase 2 (role selection)**: Display all recommended roles at once (count+2 roles)
+- **Auto-split**: If questions > 10, split into multiple rounds with clear round indicators
 
-**Example mapping**:
+**Round indicators**:
+```markdown
+===== 第 1 轮问题 (共2轮) =====
+【问题1 - ...】...
+【问题2 - ...】...
+...
+【问题10 - ...】...
+
+请回答 (格式: 1a 2b ... 10c)：
+```
+
+### Interaction Flow
+
+**Standard flow**:
+1. Output questions in formatted text
+2. Output expected input format example
+3. Wait for user input
+4. Parse input with intelligent matching
+5. If parsing succeeds → Store answers and continue
+6. If parsing fails → Show error, example, and wait for re-input
+
+**No question/option limits**: Text-based interaction removes previous 4-question and 4-option restrictions
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Session Management
+- Check `.workflow/.active-*` markers first
+- Multiple sessions → Prompt selection | Single → Use it | None → Create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
+- Parse `--count N` parameter from user input (default: 3 if not specified)
+- Store decisions in `workflow-session.json` including count parameter
+
+### Phase 0: Automatic Project Context Collection
+
+**Goal**: Gather project architecture, documentation, and relevant code context BEFORE user interaction
+
+**Detection Mechanism** (execute first):
 ```javascript
-// If roles = ["ui-designer", "system-architect"]
-Generate:
-- UI Designer section: UI Requirements, UX Challenges
-- System Architect section: Architecture Decisions, Technical Implementation
-- Integration Points: UI↔Architecture dependencies
+// Check if context-package already exists
+const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`;
+
+if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
+  // Validate package
+  const package = Read(contextPackagePath);
+  if (package.metadata.session_id === session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid context-package found, skipping Phase 0");
+    return; // Skip to Phase 1
+  }
+}
 ```
 
-### Framework Generation Examples
+**Implementation**: Invoke `context-search-agent` only if package doesn't exist
 
-#### Example 1: Architecture-Heavy Topic
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Design scalable microservices platform" --roles "system-architect,data-architect,subject-matter-expert"
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
+  description="Gather project context for brainstorm",
+  prompt=`
+You are executing as context-search-agent (.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md).
+
+## Execution Mode
+**BRAINSTORM MODE** (Lightweight) - Phase 1-2 only (skip deep analysis)
+
+## Session Information
+- **Session ID**: ${session_id}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Output Path**: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+
+## Mission
+Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for implementation planning:
+
+### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
+1. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
+2. **Foundation**: Initialize code-index, get project structure, load docs
+3. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity
+
+### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
+Execute all 3 discovery tracks:
+- **Track 1**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
+- **Track 2**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
+- **Track 3**: Codebase analysis (5-layer discovery: files, content, patterns, deps, config/tests)
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
+1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
+2. Synthesize 3-source data (docs > code > web)
+3. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
+4. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
+5. Generate and validate context-package.json
+
+## Output Requirements
+Complete context-package.json with:
+- **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
+- **project_context**: architecture_patterns, coding_conventions, tech_stack
+- **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
+- **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
+- **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
+- **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy}
+
+## Quality Validation
+Before completion verify:
+- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
+- [ ] File relevance accuracy >80%
+- [ ] Dependency graph complete (max 2 transitive levels)
+- [ ] Conflict risk level calculated correctly
+- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
+- [ ] Total files ≤50 (prioritize high-relevance)
+
+Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
+Report completion with statistics.
+`
+)
 ```
-**Generated framework focuses on**:
-- Service architecture and communication patterns
-- Data flow and storage strategies
-- Domain standards and best practices
 
-#### Example 2: User-Focused Topic
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Improve user onboarding experience" --roles "ui-designer,ux-expert,product-manager"
+**Graceful Degradation**:
+- If agent fails: Log warning, continue to Phase 1 without project context
+- If package invalid: Re-run context-search-agent
+
+### Phase 1: Topic Analysis & Intent Classification
+
+**Goal**: Extract keywords/challenges to drive all subsequent question generation, **enriched by Phase 0 project context**
+
+**Steps**:
+1. **Load Phase 0 context** (if available):
+   - Read `.workflow/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
+   - Extract: tech_stack, existing modules, conflict_risk, relevant files
+
+2. **Deep topic analysis** (context-aware):
+   - Extract technical entities from topic + existing codebase
+   - Identify core challenges considering existing architecture
+   - Consider constraints (timeline/budget/compliance)
+   - Define success metrics based on current project state
+
+3. **Generate 2-4 context-aware probing questions**:
+   - Reference existing tech stack in questions
+   - Consider integration with existing modules
+   - Address identified conflict risks from Phase 0
+   - Target root challenges and trade-off priorities
+
+4. **User interaction**: Output questions using text format (see User Interaction Protocol), wait for user input
+
+5. **Parse user answers**: Use intelligent parsing to extract answers from user input (support multiple formats)
+
+6. **Storage**: Store answers to `session.intent_context` with `{extracted_keywords, identified_challenges, user_answers, project_context_used}`
+
+**Example Output**:
+```markdown
+===== Phase 1: 项目意图分析 =====
+
+【问题1 - 核心挑战】实时协作平台的主要技术挑战？
+a) 实时数据同步
+   说明：100+用户同时在线，状态同步复杂度高
+b) 可扩展性架构
+   说明：用户规模增长时的系统扩展能力
+c) 冲突解决机制
+   说明：多用户同时编辑的冲突处理策略
+
+【问题2 - 优先级】MVP阶段最关注的指标？
+a) 功能完整性
+   说明：实现所有核心功能
+b) 用户体验
+   说明：流畅的交互体验和响应速度
+c) 系统稳定性
+   说明：高可用性和数据一致性
+
+请回答 (格式: 1a 2b)：
 ```
-**Generated framework focuses on**:
-- Onboarding flow and UI components
-- User experience optimization and usability
-- Business value and success metrics
 
-#### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize sprint delivery process" --roles "scrum-master,product-owner,test-strategist"
+**User input examples**:
+- `1a 2c` → Q1:a, Q2:c
+- `1a,2c` → Q1:a, Q2:c
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: Questions MUST reference topic keywords. Generic "Project type?" violates dynamic generation.
+
+### Phase 2: Role Selection
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: User MUST interact to select roles. NEVER auto-select without user confirmation.
+
+**Available Roles**:
+- data-architect (数据架构师)
+- product-manager (产品经理)
+- product-owner (产品负责人)
+- scrum-master (敏捷教练)
+- subject-matter-expert (领域专家)
+- system-architect (系统架构师)
+- test-strategist (测试策略师)
+- ui-designer (UI 设计师)
+- ux-expert (UX 专家)
+
+**Steps**:
+1. **Intelligent role recommendation** (AI analysis):
+   - Analyze Phase 1 extracted keywords and challenges
+   - Use AI reasoning to determine most relevant roles for the specific topic
+   - Recommend count+2 roles (e.g., if user wants 3 roles, recommend 5 options)
+   - Provide clear rationale for each recommended role based on topic context
+
+2. **User selection** (text interaction):
+   - Output all recommended roles at once (no batching needed for count+2 roles)
+   - Display roles with labels and relevance rationale
+   - Wait for user input in multi-select format
+   - Parse user input (support multiple formats)
+   - **Storage**: Store selections to `session.selected_roles`
+
+**Example Output**:
+```markdown
+===== Phase 2: 角色选择 =====
+
+【角色选择】请选择 3 个角色参与头脑风暴分析
+
+a) system-architect (系统架构师)
+   推荐理由：实时同步架构设计和技术选型的核心角色
+b) ui-designer (UI设计师)
+   推荐理由：协作界面用户体验和实时状态展示
+c) product-manager (产品经理)
+   推荐理由：功能优先级和MVP范围决策
+d) data-architect (数据架构师)
+   推荐理由：数据同步模型和存储方案设计
+e) ux-expert (UX专家)
+   推荐理由：多用户协作交互流程优化
+
+支持格式：
+- 分别选择：2a 2c 2d (选择a、c、d)
+- 合并语法：2acd (选择a、c、d)
+- 逗号分隔：2a,c,d (选择a、c、d)
+
+请输入选择：
 ```
-**Generated framework focuses on**:
-- Sprint planning and team collaboration
-- Backlog management and prioritization
-- Quality assurance and testing strategies
 
-#### Example 4: Comprehensive Analysis
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Build real-time collaboration feature"
+**User input examples**:
+- `2acd` → Roles: a, c, d (system-architect, product-manager, data-architect)
+- `2a 2c 2d` → Same result
+- `2a,c,d` → Same result
+
+**Role Recommendation Rules**:
+- NO hardcoded keyword-to-role mappings
+- Use intelligent analysis of topic, challenges, and requirements
+- Consider role synergies and coverage gaps
+- Explain WHY each role is relevant to THIS specific topic
+- Default recommendation: count+2 roles for user to choose from
+
+### Phase 3: Role-Specific Questions (Dynamic Generation)
+
+**Goal**: Generate deep questions mapping role expertise to Phase 1 challenges
+
+**Algorithm**:
 ```
-**Generated framework covers** all aspects (no roles specified)
+FOR each selected role:
+  1. Map Phase 1 challenges to role domain:
+     - "real-time sync" + system-architect → State management pattern
+     - "100 users" + system-architect → Communication protocol
+     - "low latency" + system-architect → Conflict resolution
 
-## Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before processing
-- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active sessions
-- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
-- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session for all processing
-- **Context preservation**: All discussion and analysis stored in session directory
-- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent state
+  2. Generate 3-4 questions per role probing implementation depth, trade-offs, edge cases:
+     Q: "How handle real-time state sync for 100+ users?" (explores approach)
+     Q: "How resolve conflicts when 2 users edit simultaneously?" (explores edge case)
+     Options: [Event Sourcing/Centralized/CRDT] (concrete, explain trade-offs for THIS use case)
 
-## Discussion Areas
+  3. Output questions in text format per role:
+     - Display all questions for current role (3-4 questions, no 10-question limit)
+     - Questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+     - Wait for user input
+     - Parse answers using intelligent parsing
+     - Store answers to session.role_decisions[role]
+```
 
-### Core Investigation Topics
-- **Purpose & Goals**: What are we trying to achieve?
-- **Scope & Boundaries**: What's included and excluded?
-- **Success Criteria**: How do we measure success?
-- **Constraints**: What limitations exist?
-- **Stakeholders**: Who is affected or involved?
+**Batching Strategy**:
+- Each role outputs all its questions at once (typically 3-4 questions)
+- No need to split per role (within 10-question batch limit)
+- Multiple roles processed sequentially (one role at a time for clarity)
 
-### Technical Considerations
-- **Requirements**: What must the solution provide?
-- **Dependencies**: What does it rely on?
-- **Integration**: How does it connect to existing systems?
-- **Performance**: What are the speed/scale requirements?
-- **Security**: What protection is needed?
+**Output Format**: Follow standard format from "User Interaction Protocol" section (single-choice question format)
 
-### Implementation Factors
-- **Timeline**: When is it needed?
-- **Resources**: What people/budget/tools are available?
-- **Risks**: What could go wrong?
-- **Alternatives**: What other approaches exist?
-- **Migration**: How do we transition from current state?
+**Example Topic-Specific Questions** (system-architect role for "real-time collaboration platform"):
+- "100+ 用户实时状态同步方案?" → Options: Event Sourcing / 集中式状态管理 / CRDT
+- "两个用户同时编辑冲突如何解决?" → Options: 自动合并 / 手动解决 / 版本控制
+- "低延迟通信协议选择?" → Options: WebSocket / SSE / 轮询
+- "系统扩展性架构方案?" → Options: 微服务 / 单体+缓存 / Serverless
 
-## Update Mechanism ⚠️ SMART UPDATES
+**Quality Requirements**: See "Question Generation Guidelines" section for detailed rules
 
-### Framework Update Logic
-```bash
-# Check existing framework
-IF topic-framework.md EXISTS:
-    SHOW current framework to user
-    ASK: "Framework exists. Do you want to:"
-    OPTIONS:
-      1. "Replace completely" → Generate new framework
-      2. "Add discussion points" → Append to existing
-      3. "Refine existing points" → Interactive editing
-      4. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+### Phase 4: Cross-Role Clarification (Conflict Detection)
+
+**Goal**: Resolve ACTUAL conflicts from Phase 3 answers, not pre-defined relationships
+
+**Algorithm**:
+```
+1. Analyze Phase 3 answers for conflicts:
+   - Contradictory choices: product-manager "fast iteration" vs system-architect "complex Event Sourcing"
+   - Missing integration: ui-designer "Optimistic updates" but system-architect didn't address conflict handling
+   - Implicit dependencies: ui-designer "Live cursors" but no auth approach defined
+
+2. FOR each detected conflict:
+   Generate clarification questions referencing SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices
+
+3. Output clarification questions in text format:
+   - Batch conflicts into rounds (max 10 questions per round)
+   - Display questions with context from Phase 3 answers
+   - Questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+   - Wait for user input
+   - Parse answers using intelligent parsing
+   - Store answers to session.cross_role_decisions
+
+4. If NO conflicts: Skip Phase 4 (inform user: "未检测到跨角色冲突，跳过Phase 4")
+```
+
+**Batching Strategy**:
+- Maximum 10 clarification questions per round
+- If conflicts > 10, split into multiple rounds
+- Prioritize most critical conflicts first
+
+**Output Format**: Follow standard format from "User Interaction Protocol" section (single-choice question format with background context)
+
+**Example Conflict Detection** (from Phase 3 answers):
+- **Architecture Conflict**: "CRDT 与 UI 回滚期望冲突，如何解决?"
+  - Background: system-architect chose CRDT, ui-designer expects rollback UI
+  - Options: 采用 CRDT / 显示合并界面 / 切换到 OT
+- **Integration Gap**: "实时光标功能缺少身份认证方案"
+  - Background: ui-designer chose live cursors, no auth defined
+  - Options: OAuth 2.0 / JWT Token / Session-based
+
+**Quality Requirements**: See "Question Generation Guidelines" section for conflict-specific rules
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Guidance Specification
+
+**Steps**:
+1. Load all decisions: `intent_context` + `selected_roles` + `role_decisions` + `cross_role_decisions`
+2. Transform Q&A pairs to declarative: Questions → Headers, Answers → CONFIRMED/SELECTED statements
+3. Generate guidance-specification.md (template below) - **PRIMARY OUTPUT FILE**
+4. Update workflow-session.json with **METADATA ONLY**:
+   - session_id (e.g., "WFS-topic-slug")
+   - selected_roles[] (array of role names, e.g., ["system-architect", "ui-designer", "product-manager"])
+   - topic (original user input string)
+   - timestamp (ISO-8601 format)
+   - phase_completed: "artifacts"
+   - count_parameter (number from --count flag)
+5. Validate: No interrogative sentences in .md file, all decisions traceable, no content duplication in .json
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL OUTPUT SEPARATION**:
+- **guidance-specification.md**: Full guidance content (decisions, rationale, integration points)
+- **workflow-session.json**: Session metadata ONLY (no guidance content, no decisions, no Q&A pairs)
+- **NO content duplication**: Guidance stays in .md, metadata stays in .json
+
+## Output Document Template
+
+**File**: `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
+
+```markdown
+# [Project] - Confirmed Guidance Specification
+
+**Metadata**: [timestamp, type, focus, roles]
+
+## 1. Project Positioning & Goals
+**CONFIRMED Objectives**: [from topic + Phase 1]
+**CONFIRMED Success Criteria**: [from Phase 1 answers]
+
+## 2-N. [Role] Decisions
+### SELECTED Choices
+**[Question topic]**: [User's answer]
+- **Rationale**: [From option description]
+- **Impact**: [Implications]
+
+### Cross-Role Considerations
+**[Conflict resolved]**: [Resolution from Phase 4]
+- **Affected Roles**: [Roles involved]
+
+## Cross-Role Integration
+**CONFIRMED Integration Points**: [API/Data/Auth from multiple roles]
+
+## Risks & Constraints
+**Identified Risks**: [From answers] → Mitigation: [Approach]
+
+## Next Steps
+**⚠️ Automatic Continuation** (when called from auto-parallel):
+- auto-parallel will assign agents to generate role-specific analysis documents
+- Each selected role gets dedicated conceptual-planning-agent
+- Agents read this guidance-specification.md for framework context
+
+## Appendix: Decision Tracking
+| Decision ID | Category | Question | Selected | Phase | Rationale |
+|-------------|----------|----------|----------|-------|-----------|
+| D-001 | Intent | [Q] | [A] | 1 | [Why] |
+| D-002 | Roles | [Selected] | [Roles] | 2 | [Why] |
+| D-003+ | [Role] | [Q] | [A] | 3 | [Why] |
+```
+
+## Question Generation Guidelines
+
+### Core Principle: Developer-Facing Questions with User Context
+
+**Target Audience**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
+
+**Generation Philosophy**:
+1. **Phase 1**: 用户场景、业务约束、优先级（建立上下文）
+2. **Phase 2**: 基于话题分析的智能角色推荐（非关键词映射）
+3. **Phase 3**: 业务需求 + 技术选型（需求驱动的技术决策）
+4. **Phase 4**: 技术冲突的业务权衡（帮助开发者理解影响）
+
+### Universal Quality Rules
+
+**Question Structure** (all phases):
+```
+[业务场景/需求前提] + [技术关注点]
+```
+
+**Option Structure** (all phases):
+```
+标签：[技术方案简称] + (业务特征)
+说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]
+```
+
+**MUST Include** (all phases):
+- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+- ✅ 业务场景作为问题前提
+- ✅ 技术选项的业务影响说明
+- ✅ 量化指标和约束条件
+
+**MUST Avoid** (all phases):
+- ❌ 纯技术选型无业务上下文
+- ❌ 过度抽象的用户体验问题
+- ❌ 脱离话题的通用架构问题
+
+### Phase-Specific Requirements
+
+**Phase 1 Requirements**:
+- Questions MUST reference topic keywords (NOT generic "Project type?")
+- Focus: 用户使用场景（谁用？怎么用？多频繁？）、业务约束（预算、时间、团队、合规）
+- Success metrics: 性能指标、用户体验目标
+- Priority ranking: MVP vs 长期规划
+
+**Phase 3 Requirements**:
+- Questions MUST reference Phase 1 keywords (e.g., "real-time", "100 users")
+- Options MUST be concrete approaches with relevance to topic
+- Each option includes trade-offs specific to this use case
+- Include 业务需求驱动的技术问题、量化指标（并发数、延迟、可用性）
+
+**Phase 4 Requirements**:
+- Questions MUST reference SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices in background context
+- Options address the detected conflict directly
+- Each option explains impact on both conflicting roles
+- NEVER use static "Cross-Role Matrix" - ALWAYS analyze actual Phase 3 answers
+- Focus: 技术冲突的业务权衡、帮助开发者理解不同选择的影响
+
+## Validation Checklist
+
+Generated guidance-specification.md MUST:
+- ✅ No interrogative sentences (use CONFIRMED/SELECTED)
+- ✅ Every decision traceable to user answer
+- ✅ Cross-role conflicts resolved or documented
+- ✅ Next steps concrete and specific
+- ✅ All Phase 1-4 decisions in session metadata
+
+## Update Mechanism
+
+```
+IF guidance-specification.md EXISTS:
+  Prompt: "Regenerate completely / Update sections / Cancel"
 ELSE:
-    CREATE new framework
+  Run full Phase 1-5 flow
 ```
 
-### Update Strategies
+## Governance Rules
 
-**1. Complete Replacement**
-- Backup existing framework as `topic-framework-[timestamp].md.backup`
-- Generate completely new framework
-- Preserve role-specific analysis points from previous version
+**Output Requirements**:
+- All decisions MUST use CONFIRMED/SELECTED (NO "?" in decision sections)
+- Every decision MUST trace to user answer
+- Conflicts MUST be resolved (not marked "TBD")
+- Next steps MUST be actionable
+- Topic preserved as authoritative reference in session
 
-**2. Incremental Addition**
-- Load existing framework
-- Identify new discussion areas through user interaction
-- Add new sections while preserving existing structure
-- Update framework usage instructions
+**CRITICAL**: Guidance is single source of truth for downstream phases. Ambiguity violates governance.
 
-**3. Refinement Mode**
-- Interactive editing of existing discussion points
-- Allow modification of scope, objectives, and questions
-- Preserve framework structure and role assignments
-- Update timestamp and version info
+## Storage Validation
 
-### Version Control
-- **Backup Creation**: Always backup before major changes
-- **Change Tracking**: Include change summary in framework footer
-- **Rollback Support**: Keep previous version accessible
+**workflow-session.json** (metadata only):
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-{topic-slug}",
+  "type": "brainstorming",
+  "topic": "{original user input}",
+  "selected_roles": ["system-architect", "ui-designer", "product-manager"],
+  "phase_completed": "artifacts",
+  "timestamp": "2025-10-24T10:30:00Z",
+  "count_parameter": 3
+}
+```
 
-## Error Handling
-- **Session creation failure**: Provide clear error message and retry option
-- **Discussion stalling**: Offer structured prompts to continue exploration
-- **Documentation issues**: Graceful handling of file creation problems
-- **Missing context**: Prompt for additional information when needed
+**⚠️ Rule**: Session JSON stores ONLY metadata (session_id, selected_roles[], topic, timestamps). All guidance content goes to guidance-specification.md.
 
-## Reference Information
+## File Structure
 
-### File Structure Reference
-**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-**Session Management**: Standard workflow session protocols
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[topic]/
+├── .active-brainstorming
+├── workflow-session.json              # Session metadata ONLY
+└── .brainstorming/
+    └── guidance-specification.md      # Full guidance content
+```
 
-### Integration Points
-- **Compatible with**: Other brainstorming commands in the same session
-- **Builds foundation for**: More detailed planning and implementation phases
-- **Outputs used by**: `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` command for cross-analysis integration

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-parallel.md

@@ -1,325 +1,464 @@
 ---
 name: auto-parallel
-description: Parallel brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and concurrent execution
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description"
+description: Parallel brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and concurrent execution across multiple perspectives
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description" [--count N]
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
 # Workflow Brainstorm Parallel Auto Command
 
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 3 phases in sequence (interactive framework → parallel role analysis → synthesis), coordinating specialized commands/agents through task attachment model.
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- Task agent execution **attaches analysis tasks** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Phase 1: artifacts command attaches its internal tasks (Phase 1-5)
+- Phase 2: N conceptual-planning-agent tasks attached in parallel
+- Phase 3: synthesis command attaches its internal tasks
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially (Phase 1, 3) or in parallel (Phase 2)
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow**:
+
+This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 1 (artifacts) handles user interaction, Phase 2 (role agents) runs in parallel.
+
+1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "topic" [--count N]`
+2. **Phase 1 executes** → artifacts command (tasks ATTACHED) → Auto-continues
+3. **Phase 2 executes** → Parallel role agents (N tasks ATTACHED concurrently) → Auto-continues
+4. **Phase 3 executes** → Synthesis command (tasks ATTACHED) → Reports final summary
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When Phase 1 (artifacts) finishes executing, automatically load roles and launch Phase 2 agents
+- When Phase 2 (all agents) finishes executing, automatically execute Phase 3 synthesis
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not analyze topic before Phase 1 - artifacts handles all analysis
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract selected_roles from workflow-session.json after Phase 1
+4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand and Task invocations **attach** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
+8. **Parallel Execution**: Phase 2 attaches multiple agent tasks simultaneously for concurrent execution
+
 ## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>"
-```
-
-## Role Selection Logic
-- **Technical & Architecture**: `architecture|system|performance|database|security` → system-architect, data-architect, security-expert, subject-matter-expert
-- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, user-researcher, product-manager, ux-expert, product-owner
-- **Business & Process**: `business|process|workflow|cost|innovation|testing` → business-analyst, innovation-lead, test-strategist
-- **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
-- **Multi-role**: Complex topics automatically select 2-3 complementary roles
-- **Default**: `product-manager` if no clear match
-
-**Template Loading**: `bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role-name>.md"))`
-**Template Source**: `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
-**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
-
-**Example**:
-```bash
-bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/system-architect.md"))
-bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ui-designer.md"))
-```
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Structured Topic Processing → Role Analysis → Synthesis
-The command follows a structured three-phase approach with dedicated document types:
-
-**Phase 1: Framework Generation** ⚠️ COMMAND EXECUTION
-- **Role selection**: Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic)
-- **Call artifacts command**: Execute `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --roles "{role1,role2,role3}"` using SlashCommand tool
-- **Role-specific framework**: Generate framework with sections tailored to selected roles
-
-**Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution** ⚠️ PARALLEL AGENT ANALYSIS
-- **Parallel execution**: Multiple roles execute simultaneously for faster completion
-- **Independent agents**: Each role gets dedicated conceptual-planning-agent running in parallel
-- **Shared framework**: All roles reference the same topic framework for consistency
-- **Concurrent generation**: Role-specific analysis documents generated simultaneously
-- **Progress tracking**: Parallel agents update progress independently
-
-**Phase 3: Synthesis Generation** ⚠️ COMMAND EXECUTION
-- **Call synthesis command**: Execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` using SlashCommand tool
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Simplified Command Orchestration ⚠️ STREAMLINED
-Auto command coordinates independent specialized commands:
-
-**Command Sequence**:
-1. **Role Selection**: Auto-select 2-3 relevant roles based on topic keywords
-2. **Generate Role-Specific Framework**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --roles "{role1,role2,role3}"`
-3. **Parallel Role Analysis**: Execute selected role agents in parallel, each reading their specific framework section
-4. **Generate Synthesis**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis`
-
-**SlashCommand Integration**:
-1. **artifacts command**: Called via SlashCommand tool with `--roles` parameter for role-specific framework generation
-2. **role agents**: Each agent reads its dedicated section in the role-specific framework
-3. **synthesis command**: Called via SlashCommand tool for final integration with role-targeted insights
-4. **Command coordination**: SlashCommand handles execution and validation
-
-**Role Selection Logic**:
-- **Technical**: `architecture|system|performance|database` → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
-- **Auto-select**: 2-3 most relevant roles based on topic analysis
-
-### Simplified Processing Standards
-
-**Core Principles**:
-1. **Minimal preprocessing** - Only workflow-session.json and basic role selection
-2. **Agent autonomy** - Agents handle their own context and validation
-3. **Parallel execution** - Multiple agents can work simultaneously
-4. **Post-processing synthesis** - Integration happens after agent completion
-5. **TodoWrite control** - Progress tracking throughout all phases
-
-**Implementation Rules**:
-- **Maximum 3 roles**: Auto-selected based on simple keyword mapping
-- **No upfront validation**: Agents handle their own context requirements
-- **Parallel execution**: Each agent operates concurrently without dependencies
-- **Synthesis at end**: Integration only after all agents complete
-
-**Agent Self-Management** (Agents decide their own approach):
-- **Context gathering**: Agents determine what questions to ask
-- **Template usage**: Agents load and apply their own role templates
-- **Analysis depth**: Agents determine appropriate level of detail
-- **Documentation**: Agents create their own file structure and content
-
-### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before role processing
-- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active brainstorming sessions
-- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
-- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session for all role processing
-- **Context preservation**: Each role's context and agent output stored in session directory
-- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent brainstorming state and role assignments
-
-## Document Generation
-
-**Command Coordination Workflow**: artifacts → parallel role analysis → synthesis
-
-**Output Structure**: Coordinated commands generate framework, role analyses, and synthesis documents as defined in their respective command specifications.
-
-
-## Agent Prompt Templates
-
-### Task Agent Invocation Template
-
 
 ```bash
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: {role-name} perspective for {topic}
-
-     ## Role Assignment
-     **ASSIGNED_ROLE**: {role-name}
-     **TOPIC**: {user-provided-topic}
-     **OUTPUT_LOCATION**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/
-
-     ## Execution Instructions
-     [FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-     ### Flow Control Steps
-     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these pre_analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
-
-     1. **load_topic_framework**
-        - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-        - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'Topic framework not found')
-        - Output: topic_framework
-
-     2. **load_role_template**
-        - Action: Load {role-name} planning template
-        - Command: bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
-        - Output: role_template
-
-     3. **load_session_metadata**
-        - Action: Load session metadata and topic description
-        - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')
-        - Output: session_metadata
-
-     ### Implementation Context
-     **Topic Framework**: Use loaded topic-framework.md for structured analysis
-     **Role Focus**: {role-name} domain expertise and perspective
-     **Analysis Type**: Address framework discussion points from role perspective
-     **Template Framework**: Combine role template with topic framework structure
-     **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing all topic framework points
-
-     ### Session Context
-     **Workflow Directory**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/
-     **Output Directory**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/
-     **Session JSON**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json
-
-     ### Dependencies & Context
-     **Topic**: {user-provided-topic}
-     **Role Template**: "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"
-     **User Requirements**: To be gathered through interactive questioning
-
-     ## Completion Requirements
-     1. Execute all flow control steps in sequence (load topic framework, role template, session metadata)
-     2. **Address Topic Framework**: Respond to all discussion points in topic-framework.md from role perspective
-     3. Apply role template guidelines within topic framework structure
-     4. Generate structured role analysis addressing framework points
-     5. Create single comprehensive deliverable in OUTPUT_LOCATION:
-        - analysis.md (structured analysis addressing all topic framework points with role-specific insights)
-     6. Include framework reference: @../topic-framework.md in analysis.md
-     7. Update workflow-session.json with completion status",
-     description="Execute {role-name} brainstorming analysis")
+/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>" [--count N] [--style-skill package-name]
 ```
 
-### Parallel Role Agent调用示例
+**Recommended Structured Format**:
 ```bash
-# Execute multiple roles in parallel using single message with multiple Task calls
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: system-architect perspective for {topic}...",
-     description="Execute system-architect brainstorming analysis")
-
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: ui-designer perspective for {topic}...",
-     description="Execute ui-designer brainstorming analysis")
-
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: security-expert perspective for {topic}...",
-     description="Execute security-expert brainstorming analysis")
+/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "GOAL: [objective] SCOPE: [boundaries] CONTEXT: [background]" [--count N] [--style-skill package-name]
 ```
 
-### Direct Synthesis Process (Command-Driven)
-**Synthesis execution**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` after role completion
+**Parameters**:
+- `topic` (required): Topic or challenge description (structured format recommended)
+- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles to select (default: 3, max: 9)
+- `--style-skill package-name` (optional): Style SKILL package to load for UI design (located at `.claude/skills/style-{package-name}/`)
 
+## 3-Phase Execution
 
-## TodoWrite Control Flow ⚠️ CRITICAL
+### Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation
 
-### Workflow Progress Tracking
-**MANDATORY**: Use Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite tool throughout entire brainstorming workflow:
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"{topic}\" --count {N}")`
 
+**What It Does**:
+- Topic analysis: Extract challenges, generate task-specific questions
+- Role selection: Recommend count+2 roles, user selects via AskUserQuestion
+- Role questions: Generate 3-4 questions per role, collect user decisions
+- Conflict resolution: Detect and resolve cross-role conflicts
+- Guidance generation: Transform Q&A to declarative guidance-specification.md
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- **⚠️ Memory Check**: If `selected_roles[]` already in conversation memory from previous load, skip file read
+- Extract: `selected_roles[]` from workflow-session.json (if not in memory)
+- Extract: `session_id` from workflow-session.json (if not in memory)
+- Verify: guidance-specification.md exists
+
+**Validation**:
+- guidance-specification.md created with confirmed decisions
+- workflow-session.json contains selected_roles[] (metadata only, no content duplication)
+- Session directory `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/` exists
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.1: Topic analysis and question generation (artifacts)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing topic"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.2: Role selection and user confirmation (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Selecting roles"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.3: Role questions and user decisions (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Collecting role questions"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.4: Conflict detection and resolution (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.5: Guidance specification generation (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating guidance"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** artifacts' 5 internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 1.1-1.5** sequentially
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 1 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 1**: Auto-continue to Phase 2 (parallel role agent execution)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis Execution
+
+**For Each Selected Role**:
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute {role-name} analysis for existing topic framework
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: {role-name}
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/{role}/
+TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework_content
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load {role-name} planning template
+   - Command: Read(~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md)
+   - Output: role_template_guidelines
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata and original user intent
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_context (contains original user prompt as PRIMARY reference)
+
+4. **load_style_skill** (ONLY for ui-designer role when style_skill_package exists)
+   - Action: Load style SKILL package for design system reference
+   - Command: Read(.claude/skills/style-{style_skill_package}/SKILL.md) AND Read(.workflow/reference_style/{style_skill_package}/design-tokens.json)
+   - Output: style_skill_content, design_tokens
+   - Usage: Apply design tokens in ui-designer analysis and artifacts
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Primary Reference**: Original user prompt from workflow-session.json is authoritative
+**Framework Source**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from {role-name} perspective
+**Role Focus**: {role-name} domain expertise aligned with user intent
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive {role-name} analysis addressing all framework discussion points
+   - **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
+   - **FORBIDDEN**: Never use `recommendations.md` or any filename not starting with `analysis`
+   - **Auto-split if large**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md)
+   - **Content**: Includes both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
+3. **User Intent Alignment**: Validate analysis aligns with original user objectives from session_context
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with {role-name} expertise
+- Provide actionable recommendations from {role-name} perspective within analysis files
+- All output files MUST start with `analysis` prefix (no recommendations.md or other naming)
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+- Update workflow-session.json with completion status
+"
+```
+
+**Parallel Execution**:
+- Launch N agents simultaneously (one message with multiple Task calls)
+- Each agent task **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- All agents execute concurrently, each attaching their own analysis sub-tasks
+- Each agent operates independently reading same guidance-specification.md
+
+**Input**:
+- `selected_roles[]` from Phase 1
+- `session_id` from Phase 1
+- guidance-specification.md path
+
+**Validation**:
+- Each role creates `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/analysis.md` (primary file)
+- If content is large (>800 lines), may split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files total)
+- **File naming pattern**: ALL files MUST start with `analysis` prefix (use `analysis*.md` for globbing)
+- **FORBIDDEN naming**: No `recommendations.md`, `recommendations-*.md`, or any non-`analysis` prefixed files
+- All N role analyses completed
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 agents invoked - tasks attached in parallel)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Execute system-architect analysis [conceptual-planning-agent]", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Execute ui-designer analysis [conceptual-planning-agent]", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.3: Execute product-manager analysis [conceptual-planning-agent]", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing product-manager analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Multiple Task invocations **attach** N role analysis tasks simultaneously. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks in parallel.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.1-2.N** concurrently
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 parallel tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 2**: Auto-continue to Phase 3 (synthesis)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
+
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis --session {sessionId}")`
+
+**What It Does**:
+- Load original user intent from workflow-session.json
+- Read all role analysis.md files
+- Integrate role insights into synthesis-specification.md
+- Validate alignment with user's original objectives
+
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Validation**:
+- `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md` exists
+- Synthesis references all role analyses
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Load role analysis files (synthesis)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading role analyses"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Integrate insights across roles (synthesis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Integrating insights"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Generate synthesis specification (synthesis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** synthesis' internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+Brainstorming complete for session: {sessionId}
+Roles analyzed: {count}
+Synthesis: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md
+
+✅ Next Steps:
+1. /workflow:concept-clarify --session {sessionId}  # Optional refinement
+2. /workflow:plan --session {sessionId}  # Generate implementation plan
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for parallel brainstorming workflow with interactive framework generation and concurrent role analysis.
+
+### Key Principles
+
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand/Task invoked):
+   - Sub-command's or agent's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Phase 1: `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` attaches 5 internal tasks (Phase 1.1-1.5)
+   - Phase 2: Multiple `Task(conceptual-planning-agent)` calls attach N role analysis tasks simultaneously
+   - Phase 3: `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` attaches 3 internal tasks (Phase 3.1-3.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks (sequentially for Phase 1, 3; in parallel for Phase 2)
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 1.1-1.5 collapse to "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation: completed"
+   - Phase 2: Multiple role tasks collapse to "Execute parallel role analysis: completed"
+   - Phase 3: Synthesis tasks collapse to "Execute synthesis integration: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase 1 invoked (artifacts tasks ATTACHED) → Artifacts sub-tasks executed → Phase 1 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 2 invoked (N role tasks ATTACHED in parallel) → Role analyses executed concurrently → Phase 2 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 3 invoked (synthesis tasks ATTACHED) → Synthesis sub-tasks executed → Phase 3 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Workflow complete.
+
+### Brainstorming Workflow Specific Features
+
+- **Phase 1**: Interactive framework generation with user Q&A (SlashCommand attachment)
+- **Phase 2**: Parallel role analysis execution with N concurrent agents (Task agent attachments)
+- **Phase 3**: Cross-role synthesis integration (SlashCommand attachment)
+- **Dynamic Role Count**: `--count N` parameter determines number of Phase 2 parallel tasks (default: 3, max: 9)
+- **Mixed Execution**: Sequential (Phase 1, 3) and Parallel (Phase 2) task execution
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
+- Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
+- Clear mental model: SlashCommand/Task = attach tasks, not delegate work
+- Parallel execution support for concurrent role analysis
+- Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 1, 2, 3) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
+
+## Input Processing
+
+**Count Parameter Parsing**:
 ```javascript
-// Phase 1: Create initial todo list for command-coordinated brainstorming workflow
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {
-      content: "Initialize brainstorming session and detect active sessions",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Initializing brainstorming session"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Select roles based on topic keyword analysis",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Selecting roles for brainstorming analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute artifacts command with selected roles for role-specific framework",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Generating role-specific topic framework"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute [role-1] analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL] addressing framework",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing [role-1] structured framework analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute [role-2] analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL] addressing framework",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing [role-2] structured framework analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute synthesis command using SlashCommand for final integration",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing synthesis command for integrated analysis"
-    }
-  ]
-});
+// Extract --count from user input
+IF user_input CONTAINS "--count":
+    EXTRACT count_value FROM "--count N" pattern
+    IF count_value > 9:
+        count_value = 9  // Cap at maximum 9 roles
+ELSE:
+    count_value = 3  // Default to 3 roles
 
-// Phase 2: Update status as workflow progresses - ONLY ONE task should be in_progress at a time
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {
-      content: "Initialize brainstorming session and detect active sessions",
-      status: "completed",  // Mark completed preprocessing
-      activeForm: "Initializing brainstorming session"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Select roles for topic analysis and create workflow-session.json",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Mark current task as in_progress
-      activeForm: "Selecting roles and creating session metadata"
-    },
-    // ... other tasks remain pending
-  ]
-});
-
-// Phase 3: Parallel agent execution tracking
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    // ... previous completed tasks
-    {
-      content: "Execute system-architect analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
-      activeForm: "Executing system-architect brainstorming analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute ui-designer analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
-      activeForm: "Executing ui-designer brainstorming analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute security-expert analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
-      activeForm: "Executing security-expert brainstorming analysis"
-    }
-  ]
-});
+// Pass to artifacts command
+EXECUTE: /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --count {count_value}
 ```
 
-**TodoWrite Integration Rules**:
-1. **Create initial todos**: All workflow phases at start
-2. **Mark in_progress**: Multiple parallel tasks can be in_progress simultaneously
-3. **Update immediately**: After each task completion
-4. **Track agent execution**: Include [agent-type] and [FLOW_CONTROL] markers for parallel agents
-5. **Final synthesis**: Mark synthesis as in_progress only after all parallel agents complete
+**Style-Skill Parameter Parsing**:
+```javascript
+// Extract --style-skill from user input
+IF user_input CONTAINS "--style-skill":
+    EXTRACT style_skill_name FROM "--style-skill package-name" pattern
+
+    // Validate SKILL package exists
+    skill_path = ".claude/skills/style-{style_skill_name}/SKILL.md"
+    IF file_exists(skill_path):
+        style_skill_package = style_skill_name
+        style_reference_path = ".workflow/reference_style/{style_skill_name}"
+        echo("✓ Style SKILL package found: style-{style_skill_name}")
+        echo("  Design reference: {style_reference_path}")
+    ELSE:
+        echo("⚠ WARNING: Style SKILL package not found: {style_skill_name}")
+        echo("  Expected location: {skill_path}")
+        echo("  Continuing without style reference...")
+        style_skill_package = null
+ELSE:
+    style_skill_package = null
+    echo("No style-skill specified, ui-designer will use default workflow")
+
+// Store for Phase 2 ui-designer context
+CONTEXT_VARS:
+    - style_skill_package: {style_skill_package}
+    - style_reference_path: {style_reference_path}
+```
+
+**Topic Structuring**:
+1. **Already Structured** → Pass directly to artifacts
+   ```
+   User: "GOAL: Build platform SCOPE: 100 users CONTEXT: Real-time"
+   → Pass as-is to artifacts
+   ```
+
+2. **Simple Text** → Pass directly (artifacts handles structuring)
+   ```
+   User: "Build collaboration platform"
+   → artifacts will analyze and structure
+   ```
+
+## Session Management
+
+**⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for `.workflow/.active-*` markers before Phase 1
+
+**Multiple Sessions Support**:
+- Different Claude instances can have different active brainstorming sessions
+- If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select
+- If single active session found, use it
+- If no active session exists, create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
+
+**Session Continuity**:
+- MUST use selected active session for all phases
+- Each role's context stored in session directory
+- Session isolation: Each session maintains independent state
+
+## Output Structure
+
+**Phase 1 Output**:
+- `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md` (framework content)
+- `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json` (metadata: selected_roles[], topic, timestamps, style_skill_package)
+
+**Phase 2 Output**:
+- `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/analysis.md` (one per role)
+- `.superdesign/design_iterations/` (ui-designer artifacts, if --style-skill provided)
+
+**Phase 3 Output**:
+- `.workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md` (integrated analysis)
+
+**⚠️ Storage Separation**: Guidance content in .md files, metadata in .json (no duplication)
+**⚠️ Style References**: When --style-skill provided, workflow-session.json stores style_skill_package name, ui-designer loads from `.claude/skills/style-{package-name}/`
+
+## Available Roles
+
+- data-architect (数据架构师)
+- product-manager (产品经理)
+- product-owner (产品负责人)
+- scrum-master (敏捷教练)
+- subject-matter-expert (领域专家)
+- system-architect (系统架构师)
+- test-strategist (测试策略师)
+- ui-designer (UI 设计师)
+- ux-expert (UX 专家)
+
+**Role Selection**: Handled by artifacts command (intelligent recommendation + user selection)
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Role selection failure**: artifacts defaults to product-manager with explanation
+- **Agent execution failure**: Agent-specific retry with minimal dependencies
+- **Template loading issues**: Agent handles graceful degradation
+- **Synthesis conflicts**: Synthesis highlights disagreements without resolution
 
 ## Reference Information
 
-### Structured Processing Schema
-Each role processing follows structured framework pattern:
-- **topic_framework**: Structured discussion framework document
-- **role**: Selected planning role name with framework reference
-- **agent**: Dedicated conceptual-planning-agent instance
-- **structured_analysis**: Agent addresses all framework discussion points
-- **output**: Role-specific analysis.md addressing topic framework structure
+**File Structure**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-[topic]/
+├── .active-brainstorming
+├── workflow-session.json              # Session metadata ONLY
+└── .brainstorming/
+    ├── guidance-specification.md      # Framework (Phase 1)
+    ├── {role-1}/
+    │   └── analysis.md                # Role analysis (Phase 2)
+    ├── {role-2}/
+    │   └── analysis.md
+    ├── {role-N}/
+    │   └── analysis.md
+    └── synthesis-specification.md     # Integration (Phase 3)
+```
 
-### File Structure Reference
-**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-**Role Templates**: @~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/
+**Template Source**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
 
-### Execution Integration
-Command coordination model: artifacts command → parallel role analysis → synthesis command
-
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Role selection failure**: Default to `product-manager` with explanation
-- **Agent execution failure**: Agent-specific retry with minimal dependencies
-- **Template loading issues**: Agent handles graceful degradation
-- **Synthesis conflicts**: Synthesis agent highlights disagreements without resolution
-
-## Quality Standards
-
-### Agent Autonomy Excellence
-- **Single role focus**: Each agent handles exactly one role independently
-- **Self-contained execution**: Agent manages own context, validation, and output
-- **Parallel processing**: Multiple agents can execute simultaneously
-- **Complete ownership**: Agent produces entire role-specific analysis package
-
-### Minimal Coordination Excellence
-- **Lightweight handoff**: Only topic and role assignment provided
-- **Agent self-management**: Agents handle their own workflow and validation
-- **Concurrent operation**: No inter-agent dependencies enabling parallel execution
-- **Reference-based synthesis**: Post-processing integration without content duplication
-- **TodoWrite orchestration**: Progress tracking and workflow control throughout entire process

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-squeeze.md

@@ -1,253 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto-squeeze
-description: Orchestrate 3-phase brainstorming workflow by executing commands sequentially
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for coordinated brainstorming"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Brainstorm Auto-Squeeze Command
-
-## Coordinator Role
-
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute brainstorming commands in sequence (artifacts → roles → synthesis), auto-select relevant roles, and ensure complete brainstorming workflow execution.
-
-**Execution Flow**:
-1. Initialize TodoWrite → Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) → Validate framework → Update TodoWrite
-2. Select 2-3 relevant roles → Display selection → Execute Phase 2 (role analyses) → Update TodoWrite
-3. Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) → Validate outputs → Return summary
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
-2. **Auto-Select Roles**: Analyze topic keywords to select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
-3. **Display Selection**: Show selected roles to user before execution
-4. **Sequential Execution**: Execute role commands one by one, not in parallel
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until synthesis completes
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every command completion
-
-## 3-Phase Execution
-
-### Phase 1: Framework Generation
-
-**Step 1.1: Role Selection**
-Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic below)
-
-**Step 1.2: Generate Role-Specific Framework**
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"[topic]\" --roles \"[role1,role2,role3]\"")`
-
-**Input**: Selected roles from step 1.1
-
-**Parse Output**:
-- Verify topic-framework.md created with role-specific sections
-
-**Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md` exists
-- Contains sections for each selected role
-- Includes cross-role integration points
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, mark "Display selected roles" as in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution
-
-**Step 2.1: Role Selection**
-Use keyword analysis to auto-select 2-3 roles:
-
-**Role Selection Logic**:
-- **Technical/Architecture keywords**: `architecture|system|performance|database|api|backend|scalability`
-  → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **UI/UX keywords**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|frontend|experience`
-  → ui-designer, ux-expert
-- **Product/Business keywords**: `product|feature|business|workflow|process|customer`
-  → product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile/Delivery keywords**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery`
-  → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise keywords**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation`
-  → subject-matter-expert
-- **Default**: product-manager (if no clear match)
-
-**Selection Rules**:
-- Maximum 3 roles
-- Select most relevant role first based on strongest keyword match
-- Include complementary perspectives (e.g., if system-architect selected, also consider security-expert)
-
-**Step 2.2: Display Selected Roles**
-Show selection to user before execution:
-```
-Selected roles for analysis:
-- ui-designer (UI/UX perspective)
-- system-architect (Technical architecture)
-- security-expert (Security considerations)
-```
-
-**Step 2.3: Execute Role Commands Sequentially**
-Execute each selected role command one by one:
-
-**Commands**:
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:system-architect")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:data-architect")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-manager")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-owner")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:test-strategist")`
-
-**Validation** (after each role):
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md` exists
-- Contains role-specific analysis
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark each role task completed after execution, start next role as in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis")`
-
-**Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md` exists
-- Contains cross-references to role analyses using @ notation
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
-
-**Return to User**:
-```
-Brainstorming complete for topic: [topic]
-Framework: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md
-Roles analyzed: [role1], [role2], [role3]
-Synthesis: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md
-```
-
-## TodoWrite Pattern
-
-```javascript
-// Initialize (before Phase 1)
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// After displaying roles
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// Continue pattern for each role and synthesis...
-```
-
-## Data Flow
-
-```
-User Input (topic)
-    ↓
-Role Selection (analyze topic keywords)
-    ↓ Output: 2-3 selected roles (e.g., ui-designer, system-architect, security-expert)
-    ↓
-Phase 1: artifacts "topic" --roles "role1,role2,role3"
-    ↓ Input: topic + selected roles
-    ↓ Output: role-specific topic-framework.md
-    ↓
-Display: Show selected roles to user
-    ↓
-Phase 2: Execute each role command sequentially
-    ↓ Role 1 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓ Role 2 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓ Role 3 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓
-Phase 3: synthesis
-    ↓ Input: role-specific framework + all role analyses
-    ↓ Output: synthesis-report.md with role-targeted insights
-    ↓
-Return summary to user
-```
-
-**Session Context**: All commands use active brainstorming session, sharing:
-- Role-specific topic framework
-- Role-targeted analyses
-- Cross-role integration points
-- Synthesis with role-specific insights
-
-**Key Improvement**: Framework is generated with roles parameter, ensuring all discussion points are relevant to selected roles
-
-## Role Selection Examples
-
-### Example 1: UI-Focused Topic
-**Topic**: "Redesign user authentication interface"
-**Keywords detected**: user, interface, design
-**Selected roles**:
-- ui-designer (primary: UI/UX match)
-- ux-expert (secondary: user experience)
-- subject-matter-expert (complementary: auth standards)
-
-### Example 2: Architecture Topic
-**Topic**: "Design scalable microservices architecture"
-**Keywords detected**: architecture, scalable, system
-**Selected roles**:
-- system-architect (primary: architecture match)
-- data-architect (secondary: scalability/data)
-- subject-matter-expert (complementary: domain expertise)
-
-### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
-**Topic**: "Optimize team sprint planning and delivery process"
-**Keywords detected**: sprint, team, delivery, process
-**Selected roles**:
-- scrum-master (primary: agile process match)
-- product-owner (secondary: backlog/delivery focus)
-- product-manager (complementary: product strategy)
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Framework Generation Failure**: Stop workflow, report error, do not proceed to role selection
-- **Role Analysis Failure**: Log failure, continue with remaining roles, note in final summary
-- **Synthesis Failure**: Retry once, if still fails report partial completion with available analyses
-- **Session Error**: Report session issue, prompt user to check session status
-
-## Output Structure
-
-```
-.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Phase 1 output
-├── [role1]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 1)
-├── [role2]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 2)
-├── [role3]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 3)
-└── synthesis-report.md        # Phase 3 output
-```
-
-## Coordinator Checklist
-
-✅ Initialize TodoWrite with framework + display + N roles + synthesis tasks
-✅ Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) immediately
-✅ Validate topic-framework.md exists
-✅ Analyze topic keywords for role selection
-✅ Auto-select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
-✅ Display selected roles to user with rationale
-✅ Execute each role command sequentially
-✅ Validate each role's analysis.md after execution
-✅ Update TodoWrite after each role completion
-✅ Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) after all roles complete
-✅ Validate synthesis-report.md exists
-✅ Return summary with all generated files

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/data-architect.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: data-architect
-description: Generate or update data-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update data-architect/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for data architecture perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 📊 **Data Architect Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating data-architect/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from data architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating data-architect/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from data architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Data Architecture Focus**: Data models, pipelines, governance, and analytics perspective
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -22,6 +22,26 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Data Quality Management**: Data accuracy, completeness, and consistency
 - **Analytics and Insights**: Data analysis and business intelligence solutions
 
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Canonical Data Model - Source of Truth)**
+- **Canonical Data Model**: The authoritative, system-wide data schema representing domain entities and relationships
+- **Entity-Relationship Design**: Defining entities, attributes, relationships, and constraints
+- **Data Normalization & Optimization**: Ensuring data integrity, reducing redundancy, and optimizing storage
+- **Database Schema Design**: Physical database structures, indexes, partitioning strategies
+- **Data Pipeline Architecture**: ETL/ELT processes, data warehousing, and analytics pipelines
+- **Data Governance**: Data quality standards, retention policies, and compliance requirements
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **API Data Contracts**: Public-facing request/response schemas exposed by APIs → Defers to **API Designer**
+- **System Integration Patterns**: How services communicate at the macro level → Defers to **System Architect**
+- **UI Data Presentation**: How data is displayed to users → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO API Designer**: Provides canonical data model that API Designer translates into public API data contracts (as projection/view)
+- **TO System Architect**: Provides data flow requirements and storage constraints to inform system design
+- **FROM System Architect**: Receives system-level integration requirements and scalability constraints
+
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
@@ -32,7 +52,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +93,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +107,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from data architecture perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from data architecture perspective
 **Role Focus**: Data models, pipelines, governance, analytics platforms
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive data architecture analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with data architecture expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with data architecture expertise
 - Provide data model designs, pipeline architectures, and governance strategies
 - Include scalability, performance, and quality considerations
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +136,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +164,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +172,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Data Architect Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Data Architecture perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with data architecture expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with data architecture expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Data architecture perspective on requirements]
@@ -189,12 +209,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Data architecture insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-manager.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: product-manager
-description: Generate or update product-manager/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update product-manager/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for product management perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🎯 **Product Manager Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating product-manager/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from product strategy perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating product-manager/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from product strategy perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Product Strategy Focus**: User needs, business value, and market positioning
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +87,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from product strategy perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from product strategy perspective
 **Role Focus**: User value, business impact, market positioning, product strategy
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive product strategy analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with product management expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with product management expertise
 - Provide actionable business strategies and user value propositions
 - Include market analysis and competitive positioning insights
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Product Manager Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Product Strategy perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with product management expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with product management expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Product strategy perspective on user needs and requirements]
@@ -189,12 +189,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Product strategy insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-owner.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: product-owner
-description: Generate or update product-owner/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update product-owner/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for product ownership perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🎯 **Product Owner Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating product-owner/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating product-owner/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Product Backlog Focus**: Feature prioritization, user stories, and acceptance criteria
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +87,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective
 **Role Focus**: Backlog management, stakeholder alignment, feature prioritization, acceptance criteria
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive product ownership analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with product ownership expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with product ownership expertise
 - Provide actionable user stories and acceptance criteria definitions
 - Include feature prioritization and stakeholder alignment strategies
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Product Owner Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Product Backlog & Feature Prioritization perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with product ownership expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with product ownership expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [User story formulation and backlog refinement perspective]
@@ -189,12 +189,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Product ownership insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/scrum-master.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: scrum-master
-description: Generate or update scrum-master/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update scrum-master/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for Agile process perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🎯 **Scrum Master Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating scrum-master/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from agile process and team collaboration perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating scrum-master/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from agile process and team collaboration perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Agile Process Focus**: Sprint planning, team dynamics, and delivery optimization
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +87,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from agile process and team collaboration perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from agile process and team collaboration perspective
 **Role Focus**: Sprint planning, team dynamics, process optimization, delivery management
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive agile process analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with scrum mastery expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with scrum mastery expertise
 - Provide actionable sprint planning and team facilitation strategies
 - Include process optimization and impediment removal insights
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Scrum Master Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Agile Process & Team Collaboration perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with scrum mastery expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with scrum mastery expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Sprint planning and iteration breakdown perspective]
@@ -189,12 +189,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Agile process insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/subject-matter-expert.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: subject-matter-expert
-description: Generate or update subject-matter-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update subject-matter-expert/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for domain expertise perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🎯 **Subject Matter Expert Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from domain knowledge and technical expertise perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from domain knowledge and technical expertise perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Domain Expertise Focus**: Deep technical knowledge, industry standards, and best practices
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +87,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from domain expertise and technical standards perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from domain expertise and technical standards perspective
 **Role Focus**: Domain knowledge, technical standards, risk assessment, knowledge transfer
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive domain expertise analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with subject matter expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with subject matter expertise
 - Provide actionable technical standards and best practices recommendations
 - Include risk assessment and compliance considerations
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Subject Matter Expert Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Domain Expertise & Technical Standards perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with subject matter expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with subject matter expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Domain-specific requirements and industry standards perspective]
@@ -189,12 +189,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Domain expertise insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md

@@ -1,497 +1,438 @@
 ---
 name: synthesis
-description: Generate synthesis-specification.md from topic-framework and role analyses with @ references
-argument-hint: "no arguments required - synthesizes existing framework and role analyses"
-allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*)
+description: Clarify and refine role analyses through intelligent Q&A and targeted updates with synthesis agent
+argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
-## 🧩 **Synthesis Document Generator**
+## Overview
 
-### Core Function
-**Specialized command for generating synthesis-specification.md** that integrates topic-framework.md and all role analysis.md files using @ reference system. Creates comprehensive implementation specification with cross-role insights.
+Three-phase workflow to eliminate ambiguities and enhance conceptual depth in role analyses:
 
-**Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically detects which roles participated in brainstorming by scanning for `*/analysis.md` files. Synthesizes only actual participating roles, not predefined lists.
+**Phase 1-2 (Main Flow)**: Session detection → File discovery → Path preparation
 
-### Primary Capabilities
-- **Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically identifies participating roles at runtime
-- **Framework Integration**: Reference topic-framework.md discussion points across all discovered roles
-- **Role Analysis Integration**: Consolidate all discovered role/analysis.md files using @ references
-- **Cross-Framework Comparison**: Compare how each participating role addressed framework discussion points
-- **@ Reference System**: Create structured references to source documents
-- **Update Detection**: Smart updates when new role analyses are added
-- **Flexible Participation**: Supports any subset of available roles (1 to 9+)
+**Phase 3A (Analysis Agent)**: Cross-role analysis → Generate recommendations
 
-### Document Integration Model
-**Three-Document Reference System**:
-1. **topic-framework.md** → Structured discussion framework (input)
-2. **[role]/analysis.md** → Role-specific analyses addressing framework (input)
-3. **synthesis-specification.md** → Complete integrated specification (output)
+**Phase 4 (Main Flow)**: User selects enhancements → User answers clarifications → Build update plan
 
-## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+**Phase 5 (Parallel Update Agents)**: Each agent updates ONE role document → Parallel execution
 
-### ⚠️ Direct Execution by Main Claude
-**Execution Model**: Main Claude directly executes this command without delegating to sub-agents.
+**Phase 6 (Main Flow)**: Metadata update → Completion report
 
-**Rationale**:
-- **Full Context Access**: Avoids context transmission loss that occurs with Task tool delegation
-- **Complex Cognitive Analysis**: Leverages main Claude's complete reasoning capabilities for cross-role synthesis
-- **Tool Usage**: Combines Read/Write/Glob tools with main Claude's analytical intelligence
+**Key Features**:
+- Multi-agent architecture (analysis agent + parallel update agents)
+- Clear separation: Agent analysis vs Main flow interaction
+- Parallel document updates (one agent per role)
+- User intent alignment validation
 
-**DO NOT use Task tool** - Main Claude performs intelligent analysis directly while reading/writing files, ensuring no information loss from context passing.
+**Document Flow**:
+- Input: `[role]/analysis*.md`, `guidance-specification.md`, session metadata
+- Output: Updated `[role]/analysis*.md` with Enhancements + Clarifications sections
 
-### Phase 1: Document Discovery & Validation
-```bash
-# Detect active brainstorming session
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
-IF active_session EXISTS:
-    session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-ELSE:
-    ERROR: "No active brainstorming session found"
-    EXIT
+## Task Tracking
 
-# Validate required documents
-CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
-IF NOT EXISTS:
-    ERROR: "topic-framework.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts first"
-    EXIT
-```
-
-### Phase 2: Role Analysis Discovery
-```bash
-# Dynamically discover available role analyses
-SCAN_DIRECTORY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-FIND_ANALYSES: [
-    Scan all subdirectories for */analysis.md files
-    Extract role names from directory names
-]
-
-# Available roles (for reference, actual participation is dynamic):
-# - product-manager
-# - product-owner
-# - scrum-master
-# - system-architect
-# - ui-designer
-# - ux-expert
-# - data-architect
-# - subject-matter-expert
-# - test-strategist
-
-LOAD_DOCUMENTS: {
-    "topic_framework": topic-framework.md,
-    "role_analyses": [dynamically discovered analysis.md files],
-    "participating_roles": [extract role names from discovered directories],
-    "existing_synthesis": synthesis-specification.md (if exists)
-}
-
-# Note: Not all roles participate in every brainstorming session
-# Only synthesize roles that actually produced analysis.md files
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Update Mechanism Check
-```bash
-# Check for existing synthesis
-IF synthesis-specification.md EXISTS:
-    SHOW current synthesis summary to user
-    ASK: "Synthesis exists. Do you want to:"
-    OPTIONS:
-      1. "Regenerate completely" → Create new synthesis
-      2. "Update with new analyses" → Integrate new role analyses
-      3. "Preserve existing" → Exit without changes
-ELSE:
-    CREATE new synthesis
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Synthesis Generation Process
-Initialize synthesis task tracking:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Validate topic-framework.md and role analyses availability", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating source documents"},
-  {"content": "Load topic framework discussion points structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading framework structure"},
-  {"content": "Cross-analyze role responses to each framework point", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cross-analyzing framework responses"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis-specification.md with @ references", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis with references"},
-  {"content": "Update session metadata with synthesis completion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating session metadata"}
+  {"content": "Detect session and validate analyses", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting session"},
+  {"content": "Discover role analysis file paths", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Discovering paths"},
+  {"content": "Execute analysis agent (cross-role analysis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing analysis agent"},
+  {"content": "Present enhancements for user selection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting enhancements"},
+  {"content": "Generate and present clarification questions", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Clarifying with user"},
+  {"content": "Build update plan from user input", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Building update plan"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel update agents (one per role)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating documents in parallel"},
+  {"content": "Update session metadata and generate report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Finalizing session"}
 ]
 ```
 
-### Phase 5: Cross-Role Analysis Execution
+## Execution Phases
 
-**Dynamic Role Processing**: The number and types of roles are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered in Phase 2.
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Validation
 
-#### 5.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
-```pseudo
-# Iterate over dynamically discovered role analyses
-FOR each discovered_role IN participating_roles:
-    role_directory = brainstorm_dir + "/" + discovered_role
+1. **Detect Session**: Use `--session` parameter or `.workflow/.active-*` marker
+2. **Validate Files**:
+   - `guidance-specification.md` (optional, warn if missing)
+   - `*/analysis*.md` (required, error if empty)
+3. **Load User Intent**: Extract from `workflow-session.json` (project/description field)
 
-    # Load role analysis (required)
-    role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
+### Phase 2: Role Discovery & Path Preparation
 
-    # Load optional artifacts if present
-    IF EXISTS(role_directory + "/recommendations.md"):
-        role_recommendations[discovered_role] = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md")
-    END IF
+**Main flow prepares file paths for Agent**:
 
-    # Extract insights from analysis
-    role_insights[discovered_role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
-    role_recommendations[discovered_role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
-    role_concerns[discovered_role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
-    role_diagrams[discovered_role] = identify_diagrams_and_visuals(role_analysis)
-END FOR
+1. **Discover Analysis Files**:
+   - Glob(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md)
+   - Supports: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md, analysis-3.md
+   - Validate: At least one file exists (error if empty)
 
-# Log participating roles for metadata
-participating_role_count = COUNT(participating_roles)
-participating_role_names = participating_roles
+2. **Extract Role Information**:
+   - `role_analysis_paths`: Relative paths from brainstorm_dir
+   - `participating_roles`: Role names extracted from directory paths
+
+3. **Pass to Agent** (Phase 3):
+   - `session_id`
+   - `brainstorm_dir`: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+   - `role_analysis_paths`: ["product-manager/analysis.md", "system-architect/analysis-1.md", ...]
+   - `participating_roles`: ["product-manager", "system-architect", ...]
+
+**Main Flow Responsibility**: File discovery and path preparation only (NO file content reading)
+
+### Phase 3A: Analysis & Enhancement Agent
+
+**First agent call**: Cross-role analysis and generate enhancement recommendations
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+## Agent Mission
+Analyze role documents, identify conflicts/gaps, and generate enhancement recommendations
+
+## Input from Main Flow
+- brainstorm_dir: {brainstorm_dir}
+- role_analysis_paths: {role_analysis_paths}
+- participating_roles: {participating_roles}
+
+## Execution Instructions
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+### Flow Control Steps
+**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
+
+1. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load original user intent as primary reference
+   - Command: Read({brainstorm_dir}/../workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: original_user_intent (from project/description field)
+
+2. **load_role_analyses**
+   - Action: Load all role analysis documents
+   - Command: For each path in role_analysis_paths: Read({brainstorm_dir}/{path})
+   - Output: role_analyses_content_map = {role_name: content}
+
+3. **cross_role_analysis**
+   - Action: Identify consensus themes, conflicts, gaps, underspecified areas
+   - Output: consensus_themes, conflicting_views, gaps_list, ambiguities
+
+4. **generate_recommendations**
+   - Action: Convert cross-role analysis findings into structured enhancement recommendations
+   - Format: EP-001, EP-002, ... (sequential numbering)
+   - Fields: id, title, affected_roles, category, current_state, enhancement, rationale, priority
+   - Taxonomy: Map to 9 categories (User Intent, Requirements, Architecture, UX, Feasibility, Risk, Process, Decisions, Terminology)
+   - Output: enhancement_recommendations (JSON array)
+
+### Output to Main Flow
+Return JSON array:
+[
+  {
+    \"id\": \"EP-001\",
+    \"title\": \"API Contract Specification\",
+    \"affected_roles\": [\"system-architect\", \"api-designer\"],
+    \"category\": \"Architecture\",
+    \"current_state\": \"High-level API descriptions\",
+    \"enhancement\": \"Add detailed contract definitions with request/response schemas\",
+    \"rationale\": \"Enables precise implementation and testing\",
+    \"priority\": \"High\"
+  },
+  ...
+]
+
+"
 ```
 
-#### 5.2 Cross-Role Insight Analysis
-```pseudo
-# Consensus identification (across all participating roles)
-consensus_areas = identify_common_themes(role_insights)
-agreement_matrix = create_agreement_matrix(role_recommendations)
+### Phase 4: Main Flow User Interaction
 
-# Disagreement analysis (track which specific roles disagree)
-disagreement_areas = identify_conflicting_views(role_insights)
-tension_points = analyze_role_conflicts(role_recommendations)
-FOR each conflict IN disagreement_areas:
-    conflict.dissenting_roles = identify_dissenting_roles(conflict)
-END FOR
+**Main flow handles all user interaction via text output**:
 
-# Innovation opportunity extraction
-innovation_opportunities = extract_breakthrough_ideas(role_insights)
-synergy_opportunities = identify_cross_role_synergies(role_insights)
-```
-
-#### 5.3 Priority and Decision Matrix Generation
-```pseudo
-# Create comprehensive evaluation matrix
-FOR each recommendation:
-    impact_score = calculate_business_impact(recommendation, role_insights)
-    feasibility_score = calculate_technical_feasibility(recommendation, role_insights)
-    effort_score = calculate_implementation_effort(recommendation, role_insights)
-    risk_score = calculate_associated_risks(recommendation, role_insights)
-    
-    priority_score = weighted_score(impact_score, feasibility_score, effort_score, risk_score)
-END FOR
-
-SORT recommendations BY priority_score DESC
-```
-
-## 📊 **Output Specification**
-
-### Output Location
-The synthesis process creates **one consolidated document** that integrates all role perspectives:
-
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework structure
-├── [role]/analysis.md          # Input: Role analyses (multiple)
-└── synthesis-specification.md  # ★ OUTPUT: Complete integrated specification
-```
-
-#### synthesis-specification.md Structure (Complete Specification)
-
-**Document Purpose**: Defines **"WHAT"** to build - comprehensive requirements and design blueprint.
-**Scope**: High-level features, requirements, and design specifications. Does NOT include executable task breakdown (that's IMPL_PLAN.md's responsibility).
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: ALL questions MUST use Chinese (所有问题必须用中文) for better user understanding
 
+1. **Present Enhancement Options** (multi-select):
 ```markdown
-# [Topic] - Integrated Implementation Specification
+===== Enhancement 选择 =====
 
-**Framework Reference**: @topic-framework.md | **Generated**: [timestamp] | **Session**: WFS-[topic-slug]
-**Source Integration**: All brainstorming role perspectives consolidated
-**Document Type**: Requirements & Design Specification (WHAT to build)
+请选择要应用的改进建议（可多选）：
 
-## Executive Summary
-Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementation priorities.
+a) EP-001: API Contract Specification
+   影响角色：system-architect, api-designer
+   说明：添加详细的请求/响应 schema 定义
 
-## Key Designs & Decisions
-### Core Architecture Diagram
-```mermaid
-graph TD
-    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
-    B --> C[Component C]
-```
-*Reference: @system-architect/analysis.md#architecture-diagram*
+b) EP-002: User Intent Validation
+   影响角色：product-manager, ux-expert
+   说明：明确用户需求优先级和验收标准
 
-### User Journey Map
-![User Journey](./assets/user-journey.png)
-*Reference: @ux-expert/analysis.md#user-journey*
+c) EP-003: Error Handling Strategy
+   影响角色：system-architect
+   说明：统一异常处理和降级方案
 
-### Data Model Overview
-```mermaid
-erDiagram
-    USER ||--o{ ORDER : places
-    ORDER ||--|{ LINE-ITEM : contains
-```
-*Reference: @data-architect/analysis.md#data-model*
-
-### Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
-**ADR-01: [Decision Title]**
-- **Context**: Background and problem statement
-- **Decision**: Chosen approach
-- **Rationale**: Why this approach was selected
-- **Reference**: @system-architect/analysis.md#adr-01
-
-## Controversial Points & Alternatives
-| Point | Adopted Solution | Alternative Solution(s) | Decision Rationale | Dissenting Roles |
-|-------|------------------|-------------------------|--------------------| -----------------|
-| Authentication | JWT Token (@security-expert) | Session-Cookie (@system-architect) | Stateless API support for multi-platform | System Architect noted session performance benefits |
-| UI Framework | React (@ui-designer) | Vue.js (@subject-matter-expert) | Team expertise and ecosystem maturity | Subject Matter Expert preferred Vue for learning curve |
-
-*This section preserves decision context and rejected alternatives for future reference.*
-
-## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria
-### Functional Requirements
-| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Source | Priority | Acceptance | Dependencies |
-|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|----------|------------|--------------|
-| FR-01 | User authentication | Enable secure multi-platform access | @product-manager/analysis.md | High | User can login via email/password | None |
-| FR-02 | Data export | User-requested analytics feature | @product-owner/analysis.md | Medium | Export to CSV/JSON | FR-01 |
-
-### Non-Functional Requirements
-| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Target | Validation | Source |
-|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|------------|--------|
-| NFR-01 | Response time | UX research shows <200ms critical | <200ms | Load testing | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
-| NFR-02 | Data encryption | Compliance requirement | AES-256 | Security audit | @security-expert/analysis.md |
-
-### Business Requirements
-| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Value | Success Metric | Source |
-|----|-------------|-------------------|-------|----------------|--------|
-| BR-01 | User retention | Market analysis shows engagement gap | High | 80% 30-day retention | @product-manager/analysis.md |
-| BR-02 | Revenue growth | Business case justification | High | 25% MRR increase | @product-owner/analysis.md |
-
-## Design Specifications
-### UI/UX Guidelines
-**Consolidated from**: @ui-designer/analysis.md, @ux-expert/analysis.md
-- Component specifications and interaction patterns
-- Visual design system and accessibility requirements
-- User flow and interface specifications
-
-### Architecture Design
-**Consolidated from**: @system-architect/analysis.md, @data-architect/analysis.md
-- System architecture and component interactions
-- Data flow and storage strategy
-- Technology stack decisions
-
-### Domain Expertise & Standards
-**Consolidated from**: @subject-matter-expert/analysis.md
-- Industry standards and best practices
-- Compliance requirements and regulations
-- Technical quality and domain-specific patterns
-
-## Process & Collaboration Concerns
-**Consolidated from**: @scrum-master/analysis.md, @product-owner/analysis.md
-
-### Team Capability Assessment
-| Required Skill | Current Level | Gap Analysis | Mitigation Strategy | Reference |
-|----------------|---------------|--------------|---------------------|-----------|
-| Kubernetes | Intermediate | Need advanced knowledge | Training + external consultant | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
-| React Hooks | Advanced | Team ready | None | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
-
-### Process Risks
-| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation | Owner |
-|------|--------|-------------|------------|-------|
-| Cross-team API dependency | High | Medium | Early API contract definition | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
-| UX-Dev alignment gap | Medium | High | Weekly design sync meetings | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
-
-### Collaboration Patterns
-- **Design-Dev Pairing**: UI Designer and Frontend Dev pair programming for complex interactions
-- **Architecture Reviews**: Weekly arch review for system-level decisions
-- **User Testing Cadence**: Bi-weekly UX testing sessions with real users
-- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#collaboration
-
-### Timeline Constraints
-- **Blocking Dependencies**: Project-X API must complete before Phase 2
-- **Resource Constraints**: Only 2 backend developers available in Q1
-- **External Dependencies**: Third-party OAuth provider integration timeline
-- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#constraints
-
-## Implementation Roadmap (High-Level)
-### Development Phases
-**Phase 1** (0-3 months): Foundation and core features
-**Phase 2** (3-6 months): Advanced features and integrations
-**Phase 3** (6+ months): Optimization and innovation
-
-### Technical Guidelines
-- Development standards and code organization
-- Testing strategy and quality assurance
-- Deployment and monitoring approach
-
-### Feature Grouping (Epic-Level)
-- High-level feature grouping and prioritization
-- Epic-level dependencies and sequencing
-- Strategic milestones and release planning
-
-**Note**: Detailed task breakdown into executable work items is handled by `/workflow:plan` → `IMPL_PLAN.md`
-
-## Risk Assessment & Mitigation
-### Critical Risks Identified
-1. **Risk**: Description | **Mitigation**: Strategy
-2. **Risk**: Description | **Mitigation**: Strategy
-
-### Success Factors
-- Key factors for implementation success
-- Continuous monitoring requirements
-- Quality gates and validation checkpoints
-
----
-*Complete implementation specification consolidating all role perspectives into actionable guidance*
+支持格式：1abc 或 1a 1b 1c 或 1a,b,c
+请输入选择（可跳过输入 skip）：
 ```
 
-## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+2. **Generate Clarification Questions** (based on analysis agent output):
+   - ✅ **ALL questions in Chinese (所有问题必须用中文)**
+   - Use 9-category taxonomy scan results
+   - Prioritize most critical questions (no hard limit)
+   - Each with 2-4 options + descriptions
 
-### Streamlined Status Synchronization
-Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+3. **Interactive Clarification Loop** (max 10 questions per round):
+```markdown
+===== Clarification 问题 (第 1/2 轮) =====
 
-**Dynamic Role Participation**: The `participating_roles` and `roles_synthesized` values are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered.
+【问题1 - 用户意图】MVP 阶段的核心目标是什么？
+a) 快速验证市场需求
+   说明：最小功能集，快速上线获取反馈
+b) 建立技术壁垒
+   说明：完善架构，为长期发展打基础
+c) 实现功能完整性
+   说明：覆盖所有规划功能，延迟上线
 
+【问题2 - 架构决策】技术栈选择的优先考虑因素？
+a) 团队熟悉度
+   说明：使用现有技术栈，降低学习成本
+b) 技术先进性
+   说明：采用新技术，提升竞争力
+c) 生态成熟度
+   说明：选择成熟方案，保证稳定性
+
+...（最多10个问题）
+
+请回答 (格式: 1a 2b 3c...)：
+```
+
+Wait for user input → Parse all answers in batch → Continue to next round if needed
+
+4. **Build Update Plan**:
+```
+update_plan = {
+  "role1": {
+    "enhancements": [EP-001, EP-003],
+    "clarifications": [
+      {"question": "...", "answer": "...", "category": "..."},
+      ...
+    ]
+  },
+  "role2": {
+    "enhancements": [EP-002],
+    "clarifications": [...]
+  },
+  ...
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Parallel Document Update Agents
+
+**Parallel agent calls** (one per role needing updates):
+
+```bash
+# Execute in parallel using single message with multiple Task calls
+
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+## Agent Mission
+Apply user-confirmed enhancements and clarifications to {role1} analysis document
+
+## Agent Intent
+- **Goal**: Integrate synthesis results into role-specific analysis
+- **Scope**: Update ONLY {role1}/analysis.md (isolated, no cross-role dependencies)
+- **Constraints**: Preserve original insights, add refinements without deletion
+
+## Input from Main Flow
+- role: {role1}
+- analysis_path: {brainstorm_dir}/{role1}/analysis.md
+- enhancements: [EP-001, EP-003] (user-selected improvements)
+- clarifications: [{question, answer, category}, ...] (user-confirmed answers)
+- original_user_intent: {from session metadata}
+
+## Execution Instructions
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+### Flow Control Steps
+**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these update steps sequentially:
+
+1. **load_current_analysis**
+   - Action: Load existing role analysis document
+   - Command: Read({brainstorm_dir}/{role1}/analysis.md)
+   - Output: current_analysis_content
+
+2. **add_clarifications_section**
+   - Action: Insert Clarifications section with Q&A
+   - Format: \"## Clarifications\\n### Session {date}\\n- **Q**: {question} (Category: {category})\\n  **A**: {answer}\"
+   - Output: analysis_with_clarifications
+
+3. **apply_enhancements**
+   - Action: Integrate EP-001, EP-003 into relevant sections
+   - Strategy: Locate section by category (Architecture → Architecture section, UX → User Experience section)
+   - Output: analysis_with_enhancements
+
+4. **resolve_contradictions**
+   - Action: Remove conflicts between original content and clarifications/enhancements
+   - Output: contradiction_free_analysis
+
+5. **enforce_terminology_consistency**
+   - Action: Align all terminology with user-confirmed choices from clarifications
+   - Output: terminology_consistent_analysis
+
+6. **validate_user_intent_alignment**
+   - Action: Verify all updates support original_user_intent
+   - Output: validated_analysis
+
+7. **write_updated_file**
+   - Action: Save final analysis document
+   - Command: Write({brainstorm_dir}/{role1}/analysis.md, validated_analysis)
+   - Output: File update confirmation
+
+### Output
+Updated {role1}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
+")
+
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+## Agent Mission
+Apply user-confirmed enhancements and clarifications to {role2} analysis document
+
+## Agent Intent
+- **Goal**: Integrate synthesis results into role-specific analysis
+- **Scope**: Update ONLY {role2}/analysis.md (isolated, no cross-role dependencies)
+- **Constraints**: Preserve original insights, add refinements without deletion
+
+## Input from Main Flow
+- role: {role2}
+- analysis_path: {brainstorm_dir}/{role2}/analysis.md
+- enhancements: [EP-002] (user-selected improvements)
+- clarifications: [{question, answer, category}, ...] (user-confirmed answers)
+- original_user_intent: {from session metadata}
+
+## Execution Instructions
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+### Flow Control Steps
+**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute same 7 update steps as {role1} agent (load → clarifications → enhancements → contradictions → terminology → validation → write)
+
+### Output
+Updated {role2}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
+")
+
+# ... repeat for each role in update_plan
+```
+
+**Agent Characteristics**:
+- **Intent**: Integrate user-confirmed synthesis results (NOT generate new analysis)
+- **Isolation**: Each agent updates exactly ONE role (parallel execution safe)
+- **Context**: Minimal - receives only role-specific enhancements + clarifications
+- **Dependencies**: Zero cross-agent dependencies (full parallelism)
+- **Validation**: All updates must align with original_user_intent
+
+### Phase 6: Completion & Metadata Update
+
+**Main flow finalizes**:
+
+1. Wait for all parallel agents to complete
+2. Update workflow-session.json:
 ```json
 {
   "phases": {
     "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "status": "completed",
-      "synthesis_completed": true,
+      "status": "clarification_completed",
+      "clarification_completed": true,
       "completed_at": "timestamp",
-      "participating_roles": ["<dynamically-discovered-role-1>", "<dynamically-discovered-role-2>", "..."],
-      "available_roles": ["product-manager", "product-owner", "scrum-master", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "data-architect", "subject-matter-expert", "test-strategist"],
-      "consolidated_output": {
-        "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
+      "participating_roles": [...],
+      "clarification_results": {
+        "enhancements_applied": ["EP-001", "EP-002", ...],
+        "questions_asked": 3,
+        "categories_clarified": ["Architecture", "UX", ...],
+        "roles_updated": ["role1", "role2", ...],
+        "outstanding_items": []
       },
-      "synthesis_quality": {
-        "role_integration": "complete",
+      "quality_metrics": {
+        "user_intent_alignment": "validated",
         "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
-        "decision_transparency": "alternatives_documented",
-        "process_risks_identified": true,
-        "implementation_readiness": "ready"
-      },
-      "content_metrics": {
-        "roles_synthesized": "<COUNT(participating_roles)>",
-        "functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "non_functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "business_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "architecture_decisions": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "controversial_points": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "diagrams_included": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "process_risks": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "team_skill_gaps": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "implementation_phases": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "risk_factors_identified": "<dynamic-count>"
+        "ambiguity_resolution": "complete",
+        "terminology_consistency": "enforced"
       }
     }
   }
 }
 ```
 
-**Example with actual values**:
+3. Generate completion report (show to user):
+```markdown
+## ✅ Clarification Complete
+
+**Enhancements Applied**: EP-001, EP-002, EP-003
+**Questions Answered**: 3/5
+**Roles Updated**: role1, role2, role3
+
+### Next Steps
+✅ PROCEED: `/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}`
+```
+
+## Output
+
+**Location**: `.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis*.md` (in-place updates)
+
+**Updated Structure**:
+```markdown
+## Clarifications
+### Session {date}
+- **Q**: {question} (Category: {category})
+  **A**: {answer}
+
+## {Existing Sections}
+{Refined content based on clarifications}
+```
+
+**Changes**:
+- User intent validated/corrected
+- Requirements more specific/measurable
+- Architecture with rationale
+- Ambiguities resolved, placeholders removed
+- Consistent terminology
+
+## Session Metadata
+
+Update `workflow-session.json`:
+
 ```json
 {
   "phases": {
     "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "status": "completed",
-      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "scrum-master"],
-      "content_metrics": {
-        "roles_synthesized": 5,
-        "functional_requirements": 18,
-        "controversial_points": 2
+      "status": "clarification_completed",
+      "clarification_completed": true,
+      "completed_at": "timestamp",
+      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", ...],
+      "clarification_results": {
+        "questions_asked": 3,
+        "categories_clarified": ["Architecture & Design", ...],
+        "roles_updated": ["system-architect", "ui-designer", ...],
+        "outstanding_items": []
+      },
+      "quality_metrics": {
+        "user_intent_alignment": "validated",
+        "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
+        "ambiguity_resolution": "complete",
+        "terminology_consistency": "enforced",
+        "decision_transparency": "documented"
       }
     }
   }
 }
 ```
 
-## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
+## Quality Checklist
 
-### Required Synthesis Elements
-- [ ] Integration of all available role analyses with comprehensive coverage
-- [ ] **Key Designs & Decisions**: Architecture diagrams, user journey maps, ADRs documented
-- [ ] **Controversial Points**: Disagreement points, alternatives, and decision rationale captured
-- [ ] **Process Concerns**: Team capability gaps, process risks, collaboration patterns identified
-- [ ] Quantified priority recommendation matrix with evaluation criteria
-- [ ] Actionable implementation plan with phased approach
-- [ ] Comprehensive risk assessment with mitigation strategies
+**Content**:
+- All role analyses loaded/analyzed
+- Cross-role analysis (consensus, conflicts, gaps)
+- 9-category ambiguity scan
+- Questions prioritized
+- Clarifications documented
 
-### Synthesis Analysis Quality Standards
-- [ ] **Completeness**: Integrates all available role analyses without gaps
-- [ ] **Visual Clarity**: Key diagrams (architecture, data model, user journey) included via Mermaid or images
-- [ ] **Decision Transparency**: Documents not just decisions, but alternatives and why they were rejected
-- [ ] **Insight Generation**: Identifies cross-role patterns and deep insights
-- [ ] **Actionability**: Provides specific, executable recommendations with rationale
-- [ ] **Balance**: Considers all role perspectives, including process-oriented roles (Scrum Master)
-- [ ] **Forward-Looking**: Includes long-term strategic and innovation considerations
+**Analysis**:
+- User intent validated
+- Cross-role synthesis complete
+- Ambiguities resolved
+- Correct roles updated
+- Terminology consistent
+- Contradictions removed
 
-### Output Validation Criteria
-- [ ] **Priority-Based**: Recommendations prioritized using multi-dimensional evaluation
-- [ ] **Context-Rich**: Each requirement includes rationale summary for immediate understanding
-- [ ] **Resource-Aware**: Team skill gaps and constraints explicitly documented
-- [ ] **Risk-Managed**: Both technical and process risks captured with mitigation strategies
-- [ ] **Measurable Success**: Clear success metrics and monitoring frameworks
-- [ ] **Clear Actions**: Specific next steps with assigned responsibilities and timelines
+**Documents**:
+- Clarifications section formatted
+- Sections reflect answers
+- No placeholders (TODO/TBD)
+- Valid Markdown
+- Cross-references maintained
 
-### Integration Excellence Standards
-- [ ] **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Successfully identifies and documents role perspective conflicts
-- [ ] **No Role Marginalization**: Process, UX, and compliance concerns equally visible as functional requirements
-- [ ] **Strategic Coherence**: Recommendations form coherent strategic direction
-- [ ] **Implementation Readiness**: Plans detailed enough for immediate execution, with clear handoff to IMPL_PLAN.md
-- [ ] **Stakeholder Alignment**: Addresses needs and concerns of all key stakeholders
-- [ ] **Decision Traceability**: Every major decision traceable to source role analysis via @ references
-- [ ] **Continuous Improvement**: Establishes framework for ongoing optimization and learning
 
-## 🚀 **Recommended Next Steps**
-
-After synthesis completion, follow this recommended workflow:
-
-### Option 1: Standard Planning Workflow (Recommended)
-```bash
-# Step 1: Verify conceptual clarity (Quality Gate)
-/workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-# → Interactive Q&A (up to 5 questions) to clarify ambiguities in synthesis
-
-# Step 2: Proceed to action planning (after concept verification)
-/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}
-# → Generates IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json files
-
-# Step 3: Verify action plan quality (Quality Gate)
-/workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-# → Read-only analysis to catch issues before execution
-
-# Step 4: Start implementation
-/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
-```
-
-### Option 2: TDD Workflow
-```bash
-# Step 1: Verify conceptual clarity
-/workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-
-# Step 2: Generate TDD task chains (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR)
-/workflow:tdd-plan --session WFS-{session-id} "Feature description"
-
-# Step 3: Verify TDD plan quality
-/workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-
-# Step 4: Execute TDD workflow
-/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
-```
-
-### Quality Gates Explained
-
-**`/workflow:concept-verify`** (Phase 2 - After Brainstorming):
-- **Purpose**: Detect and resolve conceptual ambiguities before detailed planning
-- **Time**: 10-20 minutes (interactive)
-- **Value**: Reduces downstream rework by 40-60%
-- **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md with clarifications
-
-**`/workflow:action-plan-verify`** (Phase 4 - After Planning):
-- **Purpose**: Validate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json consistency and completeness
-- **Time**: 5-10 minutes (read-only analysis)
-- **Value**: Prevents execution of flawed plans, saves 2-5 days
-- **Output**: Verification report with actionable recommendations
-
-### Skip Verification? (Not Recommended)
-
-If you want to skip verification and proceed directly:
-```bash
-/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}
-/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
-```
-
-⚠️ **Warning**: Skipping verification increases risk of late-stage issues and rework.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/system-architect.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: system-architect
-description: Generate or update system-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update system-architect/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for system architecture perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🏗️ **System Architect Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating system-architect/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from system architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating system-architect/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from system architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Architecture Focus**: Technical architecture, scalability, and system design perspective
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -22,6 +22,25 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Performance & Scalability**: Capacity planning and optimization strategies
 - **Integration Patterns**: System communication and data flow design
 
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Macro-Architecture)**
+- **System-Level Architecture**: Service boundaries, deployment topology, and system composition
+- **Cross-Service Communication Patterns**: Choosing between microservices/monolithic, event-driven/request-response, sync/async patterns
+- **Technology Stack Decisions**: Language, framework, database, and infrastructure choices
+- **Non-Functional Requirements**: Scalability, performance, availability, disaster recovery, and monitoring strategies
+- **Integration Planning**: How systems and services connect at the macro level (not specific API contracts)
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **API Contract Details**: Specific endpoint definitions, URL structures, HTTP methods → Defers to **API Designer**
+- **Data Schemas**: Detailed data model design and entity relationships → Defers to **Data Architect**
+- **UI/UX Design**: Interface design and user experience → Defers to **UX Expert** and **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO API Designer**: Provides architectural constraints (REST vs GraphQL, sync vs async) that define the API design space
+- **TO Data Architect**: Provides system-level data flow requirements and integration patterns
+- **FROM Data Architect**: Receives canonical data model to inform system integration design
+
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
@@ -32,7 +51,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -59,20 +78,20 @@ ELSE:
 ```
 
 ### Phase 3: Agent Task Generation
-**Framework-Based Analysis** (when topic-framework.md exists):
+**Framework-Based Analysis** (when guidance-specification.md exists):
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
      prompt="Generate system architect analysis addressing topic framework
 
      ## Framework Integration Required
-     **MANDATORY**: Load and address topic-framework.md discussion points
-     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+     **MANDATORY**: Load and address guidance-specification.md discussion points
+     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
      **Output Location**: {session.brainstorm_dir}/system-architect/analysis.md
 
      ## Analysis Requirements
-     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read topic-framework.md completely
+     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read guidance-specification.md completely
      2. **Address Each Discussion Point**: Respond to all 5 framework sections from system architecture perspective
-     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../topic-framework.md
+     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../guidance-specification.md
      4. **Technical Focus**: Emphasize scalability, architecture patterns, technology decisions
      5. **Structured Response**: Use framework structure for analysis organization
 
@@ -87,7 +106,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
      ```markdown
      # System Architect Analysis: [Topic]
 
-     **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md
+     **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md
      **Role Focus**: System Architecture and Technical Design
 
      ## Core Requirements Analysis
@@ -121,14 +140,14 @@ IF update_mode = "incremental":
 
          ## Current Analysis Context
          **Existing Analysis**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/system-architect/analysis.md
-         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
 
          ## Update Requirements
          1. **Preserve Structure**: Maintain existing analysis structure
          2. **Add New Insights**: Integrate new technical insights and recommendations
          3. **Framework Alignment**: Ensure continued alignment with topic framework
          4. **Technical Updates**: Add new architecture patterns, technology considerations
-         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../topic-framework.md reference
+         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../guidance-specification.md reference
 
          ## Update Instructions
          - Read existing analysis completely
@@ -144,14 +163,14 @@ IF update_mode = "incremental":
 ### Output Files
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
+├── guidance-specification.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
 └── system-architect/
     └── analysis.md            # ★ OUTPUT: Framework-based analysis
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Structure
 **Required Elements**:
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md (if framework exists)
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md (if framework exists)
 - **Role Focus**: System Architecture and Technical Design perspective
 - **5 Framework Sections**: Address each framework discussion point
 - **Technical Recommendations**: Architecture-specific insights and solutions

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ui-designer.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: ui-designer
-description: Generate or update ui-designer/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update ui-designer/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for UI design perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,19 +8,40 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🎨 **UI Designer Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating ui-designer/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from UI/UX design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating ui-designer/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from UI/UX design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **UI/UX Focus**: User experience, interface design, and accessibility perspective
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
 ### Analysis Scope
-- **User Experience Design**: Intuitive and efficient user experiences
-- **Interface Design**: Beautiful and functional user interfaces
-- **Interaction Design**: Smooth user interaction flows and micro-interactions
-- **Accessibility Design**: Inclusive design meeting WCAG compliance
+- **Visual Design**: Color palettes, typography, spacing, and visual hierarchy implementation
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished, pixel-perfect interface designs
+- **Design System Implementation**: Component libraries, design tokens, and style guides
+- **Micro-Interactions & Animations**: Transition effects, loading states, and interactive feedback
+- **Responsive Design**: Layout adaptations for different screen sizes and devices
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Concrete Visual Interface Implementation)**
+- **Visual Design Language**: Colors, typography, iconography, spacing, and overall aesthetic
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished designs showing exactly how the interface will look
+- **Design System Components**: Building and documenting reusable UI components (buttons, inputs, cards, etc.)
+- **Design Tokens**: Defining variables for colors, spacing, typography that can be used in code
+- **Micro-Interactions**: Hover states, transitions, animations, and interactive feedback details
+- **Responsive Layouts**: Adapting designs for mobile, tablet, and desktop breakpoints
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **User Research & Personas**: User behavior analysis and needs assessment → Defers to **UX Expert**
+- **Information Architecture**: Content structure and navigation strategy → Defers to **UX Expert**
+- **Low-Fidelity Wireframes**: Structural layouts without visual design → Defers to **UX Expert**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **FROM UX Expert**: Receives wireframes, user flows, and information architecture as the foundation for visual design
+- **TO Frontend Developers**: Provides design specifications, component libraries, and design tokens for implementation
+- **WITH API Designer**: Coordinates on data presentation and form validation feedback (visual aspects only)
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
@@ -32,7 +53,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +94,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +108,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from UI/UX perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from UI/UX perspective
 **Role Focus**: User experience design, interface optimization, accessibility compliance
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive UI/UX analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with UI/UX design expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with UI/UX design expertise
 - Provide actionable design recommendations and interface solutions
 - Include accessibility considerations and WCAG compliance planning
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +137,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +165,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +173,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # UI Designer Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: UI/UX Design perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with UI/UX expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with UI/UX expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [UI/UX perspective on requirements]
@@ -189,12 +210,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UI/UX insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ux-expert.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: ux-expert
-description: Generate or update ux-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
+description: Generate or update ux-expert/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for UX perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
@@ -8,19 +8,40 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ## 🎯 **UX Expert Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating ux-expert/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from user experience and interface design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating ux-expert/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from user experience and interface design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **UX Design Focus**: User interface, interaction patterns, and usability optimization
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
 ### Analysis Scope
-- **User Interface Design**: Visual hierarchy, layout patterns, and component design
-- **Interaction Patterns**: User flows, navigation, and microinteractions
-- **Usability Optimization**: Accessibility, cognitive load, and user testing strategies
-- **Design Systems**: Component libraries, design tokens, and consistency frameworks
+- **User Research**: User personas, behavioral analysis, and needs assessment
+- **Information Architecture**: Content structure, navigation hierarchy, and mental models
+- **User Journey Mapping**: User flows, task analysis, and interaction models
+- **Usability Strategy**: Accessibility planning, cognitive load reduction, and user testing frameworks
+- **Wireframing**: Low-fidelity layouts and structural prototypes (not visual design)
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Abstract User Experience & Research)**
+- **User Research & Personas**: Understanding target users, their goals, pain points, and behaviors
+- **Information Architecture**: Organizing content and defining navigation structures at a conceptual level
+- **User Journey Mapping**: Defining user flows, task sequences, and interaction models
+- **Wireframes & Low-Fidelity Prototypes**: Structural layouts showing information hierarchy (boxes and arrows, not colors/fonts)
+- **Usability Testing Strategy**: Planning user testing, A/B tests, and validation methods
+- **Accessibility Planning**: WCAG compliance strategy and inclusive design principles
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **Visual Design**: Colors, typography, spacing, visual style → Defers to **UI Designer**
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished, pixel-perfect designs → Defers to **UI Designer**
+- **Component Implementation**: Design system components, CSS, animations → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO UI Designer**: Provides wireframes, user flows, and information architecture that UI Designer will transform into high-fidelity visual designs
+- **FROM User Research**: May receive external research data to inform UX decisions
+- **TO Product Owner**: Provides user insights and validation results to inform feature prioritization
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
@@ -32,7 +53,7 @@ IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
     brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -73,7 +94,7 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -87,17 +108,17 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from user experience and interface design perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from user experience and interface design perspective
 **Role Focus**: UI design, interaction patterns, usability optimization, design systems
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive UX design analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with UX design expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with UX design expertise
 - Provide actionable interface design and usability optimization strategies
 - Include accessibility considerations and interaction pattern recommendations
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -116,7 +137,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -144,7 +165,7 @@ TodoWrite({
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -152,11 +173,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # UX Expert Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: User Experience & Interface Design perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with UX design expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with UX design expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [User interface and interaction design requirements perspective]
@@ -189,12 +210,12 @@ TodoWrite({
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
     "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UX design insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/concept-clarify.md

@@ -1,307 +0,0 @@
----
-name: concept-clarify
-description: Identify underspecified areas in brainstorming artifacts through targeted clarification questions before action planning
-argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
-allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-## User Input
-
-```text
-$ARGUMENTS
-```
-
-You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
-
-## Outline
-
-**Goal**: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in brainstorming artifacts (synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses) before moving to action planning phase.
-
-**Timing**: This command runs AFTER `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` and BEFORE `/workflow:plan`. It serves as a quality gate to ensure conceptual clarity before detailed task planning.
-
-**Execution steps**:
-
-1. **Session Detection & Validation**
-   ```bash
-   # Detect active workflow session
-   IF --session parameter provided:
-       session_id = provided session
-   ELSE:
-       CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
-       IF active_session EXISTS:
-           session_id = get_active_session()
-       ELSE:
-           ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id> or start a session."
-           EXIT
-
-   # Validate brainstorming completion
-   brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-
-   CHECK: brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
-   IF NOT EXISTS:
-       ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
-       EXIT
-
-   CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
-   IF NOT EXISTS:
-       WARN: "topic-framework.md not found. Verification will be limited."
-   ```
-
-2. **Load Brainstorming Artifacts**
-   ```bash
-   # Load primary artifacts
-   synthesis_spec = Read(brainstorm_dir + "/synthesis-specification.md")
-   topic_framework = Read(brainstorm_dir + "/topic-framework.md") # if exists
-
-   # Discover role analyses
-   role_analyses = Glob(brainstorm_dir + "/*/analysis.md")
-   participating_roles = extract_role_names(role_analyses)
-   ```
-
-3. **Ambiguity & Coverage Scan**
-
-   Perform structured scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: **Clear** / **Partial** / **Missing**.
-
-   **Requirements Clarity**:
-   - Functional requirements specificity and measurability
-   - Non-functional requirements with quantified targets
-   - Business requirements with success metrics
-   - Acceptance criteria completeness
-
-   **Architecture & Design Clarity**:
-   - Architecture decisions with rationale
-   - Data model completeness (entities, relationships, constraints)
-   - Technology stack justification
-   - Integration points and API contracts
-
-   **User Experience & Interface**:
-   - User journey completeness
-   - Critical interaction flows
-   - Error/edge case handling
-   - Accessibility and localization considerations
-
-   **Implementation Feasibility**:
-   - Team capability vs. required skills
-   - External dependencies and failure modes
-   - Resource constraints (timeline, personnel)
-   - Technical constraints and tradeoffs
-
-   **Risk & Mitigation**:
-   - Critical risks identified
-   - Mitigation strategies defined
-   - Success factors clarity
-   - Monitoring and quality gates
-
-   **Process & Collaboration**:
-   - Role responsibilities and handoffs
-   - Collaboration patterns defined
-   - Timeline and milestone clarity
-   - Dependency management strategy
-
-   **Decision Traceability**:
-   - Controversial points documented
-   - Alternatives considered and rejected
-   - Decision rationale clarity
-   - Consensus vs. dissent tracking
-
-   **Terminology & Consistency**:
-   - Canonical terms defined
-   - Consistent naming across artifacts
-   - No unresolved placeholders (TODO, TBD, ???)
-
-   For each category with **Partial** or **Missing** status, add to candidate question queue unless:
-   - Clarification would not materially change implementation strategy
-   - Information is better deferred to planning phase
-
-4. **Generate Prioritized Question Queue**
-
-   Internally generate prioritized queue of candidate questions (maximum 5):
-
-   **Constraints**:
-   - Maximum 5 questions per session
-   - Each question must be answerable with:
-     * Multiple-choice (2-5 mutually exclusive options), OR
-     * Short answer (≤5 words)
-   - Only include questions whose answers materially impact:
-     * Architecture decisions
-     * Data modeling
-     * Task decomposition
-     * Risk mitigation
-     * Success criteria
-   - Ensure category coverage balance
-   - Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk
-
-   **Prioritization Heuristic**:
-   ```
-   priority_score = (impact_on_planning * 0.4) +
-                    (uncertainty_level * 0.3) +
-                    (risk_if_unresolved * 0.3)
-   ```
-
-   If zero high-impact ambiguities found, proceed to **Step 8** (report success).
-
-5. **Sequential Question Loop** (Interactive)
-
-   Present **EXACTLY ONE** question at a time:
-
-   **Multiple-choice format**:
-   ```markdown
-   **Question {N}/5**: {Question text}
-
-   | Option | Description |
-   |--------|-------------|
-   | A | {Option A description} |
-   | B | {Option B description} |
-   | C | {Option C description} |
-   | D | {Option D description} |
-   | Short | Provide different answer (≤5 words) |
-   ```
-
-   **Short-answer format**:
-   ```markdown
-   **Question {N}/5**: {Question text}
-
-   Format: Short answer (≤5 words)
-   ```
-
-   **Answer Validation**:
-   - Validate answer maps to option or fits ≤5 word constraint
-   - If ambiguous, ask quick disambiguation (doesn't count as new question)
-   - Once satisfactory, record in working memory and proceed to next question
-
-   **Stop Conditions**:
-   - All critical ambiguities resolved
-   - User signals completion ("done", "no more", "proceed")
-   - Reached 5 questions
-
-   **Never reveal future queued questions in advance**.
-
-6. **Integration After Each Answer** (Incremental Update)
-
-   After each accepted answer:
-
-   ```bash
-   # Ensure Clarifications section exists
-   IF synthesis_spec NOT contains "## Clarifications":
-       Insert "## Clarifications" section after "# [Topic]" heading
-
-   # Create session subsection
-   IF NOT contains "### Session YYYY-MM-DD":
-       Create "### Session {today's date}" under "## Clarifications"
-
-   # Append clarification entry
-   APPEND: "- Q: {question} → A: {answer}"
-
-   # Apply clarification to appropriate section
-   CASE category:
-       Functional Requirements → Update "## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria"
-       Architecture → Update "## Key Designs & Decisions" or "## Design Specifications"
-       User Experience → Update "## Design Specifications > UI/UX Guidelines"
-       Risk → Update "## Risk Assessment & Mitigation"
-       Process → Update "## Process & Collaboration Concerns"
-       Data Model → Update "## Key Designs & Decisions > Data Model Overview"
-       Non-Functional → Update "## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria > Non-Functional Requirements"
-
-   # Remove obsolete/contradictory statements
-   IF clarification invalidates existing statement:
-       Replace statement instead of duplicating
-
-   # Save immediately
-   Write(synthesis_specification.md)
-   ```
-
-7. **Validation After Each Write**
-
-   - [ ] Clarifications section contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer
-   - [ ] Total asked questions ≤ 5
-   - [ ] Updated sections contain no lingering placeholders
-   - [ ] No contradictory earlier statements remain
-   - [ ] Markdown structure valid
-   - [ ] Terminology consistent across all updated sections
-
-8. **Completion Report**
-
-   After questioning loop ends or early termination:
-
-   ```markdown
-   ## ✅ Concept Verification Complete
-
-   **Session**: WFS-{session-id}
-   **Questions Asked**: {count}/5
-   **Artifacts Updated**: synthesis-specification.md
-   **Sections Touched**: {list section names}
-
-   ### Coverage Summary
-
-   | Category | Status | Notes |
-   |----------|--------|-------|
-   | Requirements Clarity | ✅ Resolved | Acceptance criteria quantified |
-   | Architecture & Design | ✅ Clear | No ambiguities found |
-   | Implementation Feasibility | ⚠️ Deferred | Team training plan to be defined in IMPL_PLAN |
-   | Risk & Mitigation | ✅ Resolved | Critical risks now have mitigation strategies |
-   | ... | ... | ... |
-
-   **Legend**:
-   - ✅ Resolved: Was Partial/Missing, now addressed
-   - ✅ Clear: Already sufficient
-   - ⚠️ Deferred: Low impact, better suited for planning phase
-   - ❌ Outstanding: Still Partial/Missing but question quota reached
-
-   ### Recommendations
-
-   - ✅ **PROCEED to /workflow:plan**: Conceptual foundation is clear
-   - OR ⚠️ **Address Outstanding Items First**: {list critical outstanding items}
-   - OR 🔄 **Run /workflow:concept-clarify Again**: If new information available
-
-   ### Next Steps
-   ```bash
-   /workflow:plan  # Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json
-   ```
-   ```
-
-9. **Update Session Metadata**
-
-   ```json
-   {
-     "phases": {
-       "BRAINSTORM": {
-         "status": "completed",
-         "concept_verification": {
-           "completed": true,
-           "completed_at": "timestamp",
-           "questions_asked": 3,
-           "categories_clarified": ["Requirements", "Risk", "Architecture"],
-           "outstanding_items": [],
-           "recommendation": "PROCEED_TO_PLANNING"
-         }
-       }
-     }
-   }
-   ```
-
-## Behavior Rules
-
-- **If no meaningful ambiguities found**: Report "No critical ambiguities detected. Conceptual foundation is clear." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:plan`.
-- **If synthesis-specification.md missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` first.
-- **Never exceed 5 questions** (disambiguation retries don't count as new questions).
-- **Respect user early termination**: Signals like "stop", "done", "proceed" should stop questioning.
-- **If quota reached with high-impact items unresolved**: Explicitly flag them under "Outstanding" with recommendation to address before planning.
-- **Avoid speculative tech stack questions** unless absence blocks conceptual clarity.
-
-## Operating Principles
-
-### Context Efficiency
-- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable clarifications
-- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
-- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent analysis
-
-### Verification Guidelines
-- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections**: Report them accurately
-- **Prioritize high-impact ambiguities**: Focus on what affects planning
-- **Use examples over exhaustive rules**: Cite specific instances
-- **Report zero issues gracefully**: Emit success report with coverage statistics
-- **Update incrementally**: Save after each answer to minimize context loss
-
-## Context
-
-{ARGS}

.claude/commands/workflow/execute.md

@@ -1,111 +1,150 @@
 ---
 name: execute
-description: Coordinate agents for existing workflow tasks with automatic discovery
+description: Coordinate agent execution for workflow tasks with automatic session discovery, parallel task processing, and status tracking
 argument-hint: "[--resume-session=\"session-id\"]"
 ---
 
 # Workflow Execute Command
 
 ## Overview
-Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption**, providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
+Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption** (except initial session selection if multiple active sessions exist), providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
 
 **Resume Mode**: When called with `--resume-session` flag, skips discovery phase and directly enters TodoWrite generation and agent execution for the specified session.
 
+## Performance Optimization Strategy
+
+**Lazy Loading**: Task JSONs read **on-demand** during execution, not upfront. TODO_LIST.md + IMPL_PLAN.md provide metadata for planning.
+
+| Metric | Before | After | Improvement |
+|--------|--------|-------|-------------|
+| **Initial Load** | All task JSONs (~2,300 lines) | TODO_LIST.md only (~650 lines) | **72% reduction** |
+| **Startup Time** | Seconds | Milliseconds | **~90% faster** |
+| **Memory** | All tasks | 1-2 tasks | **90% less** |
+| **Scalability** | 10-20 tasks | 100+ tasks | **5-10x** |
+
+**Loading Strategy**:
+- **TODO_LIST.md**: Read in Phase 2 (task metadata, status, dependencies)
+- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Read existence in Phase 2, parse execution strategy when needed
+- **Task JSONs**: Complete lazy loading (read only during execution)
+
 ## Core Rules
 **Complete entire workflow autonomously without user interruption, using TodoWrite for comprehensive progress tracking.**
-**Execute all discovered pending tasks sequentially until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
+**Execute all discovered pending tasks until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
 **Auto-complete session when all tasks finished: Call `/workflow:session:complete` upon workflow completion.**
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 - **Session Discovery**: Identify and select active workflow sessions
-- **Task Dependency Resolution**: Analyze task relationships and execution order
+- **Execution Strategy Parsing**: Extract execution model from IMPL_PLAN.md
 - **TodoWrite Progress Tracking**: Maintain real-time execution status throughout entire workflow
 - **Agent Orchestration**: Coordinate specialized agents with complete context
-- **Flow Control Execution**: Execute pre-analysis steps and context accumulation
 - **Status Synchronization**: Update task JSON files and workflow state
 - **Autonomous Completion**: Continue execution until all tasks complete or reach blocking state
 - **Session Auto-Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all workflow tasks finished
 
 ## Execution Philosophy
+- **IMPL_PLAN-driven**: Follow execution strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md Section 4
 - **Discovery-first**: Auto-discover existing plans and tasks
 - **Status-aware**: Execute only ready tasks with resolved dependencies
 - **Context-rich**: Provide complete task JSON and accumulated context to agents
-- **Progress tracking**: **Continuous TodoWrite updates throughout entire workflow execution**
-- **Flow control**: Sequential step execution with variable passing
-- **Autonomous completion**: **Execute all tasks without user interruption until workflow complete**
-
-## Flow Control Execution
-**[FLOW_CONTROL]** marker indicates sequential step execution required for context gathering and preparation. **These steps are executed BY THE AGENT, not by the workflow:execute command.**
-
-### Flow Control Rules
-1. **Auto-trigger**: When `task.flow_control.pre_analysis` array exists in task JSON, agents execute these steps
-2. **Sequential Processing**: Agents execute steps in order, accumulating context including artifacts
-3. **Variable Passing**: Agents use `[variable_name]` syntax to reference step outputs including artifact content
-4. **Error Handling**: Agents follow step-specific error strategies (`fail`, `skip_optional`, `retry_once`)
-5. **Artifacts Priority**: When artifacts exist in task.context.artifacts, load synthesis specifications first
-
-### Execution Pattern
-```
-Step 1: load_dependencies → dependency_context
-Step 2: analyze_patterns [dependency_context] → pattern_analysis
-Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implementation
-```
-
-### Context Accumulation Process (Executed by Agents)
-- **Load Artifacts**: Agents retrieve synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs from `context.artifacts`
-- **Load Dependencies**: Agents retrieve summaries from `context.depends_on` tasks
-- **Execute Analysis**: Agents run CLI tools with accumulated context including artifacts
-- **Prepare Implementation**: Agents build comprehensive context for implementation
-- **Continue Implementation**: Agents use all accumulated context including artifacts for task execution
+- **Progress tracking**: Continuous TodoWrite updates throughout entire workflow execution
+- **Autonomous completion**: Execute all tasks without user interruption until workflow complete
 
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
-### Resume Mode Detection
-**Special Flag Processing**: When `--resume-session="session-id"` is provided:
-1. **Skip Discovery Phase**: Use provided session ID directly
-2. **Load Specified Session**: Read session state from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
-3. **Direct TodoWrite Generation**: Skip to Phase 3 (Planning) immediately
-4. **Accelerated Execution**: Enter agent coordination without validation delays
+### Phase 1: Discovery
+**Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
 
-### Phase 1: Discovery (Normal Mode Only)
+**Process**:
 1. **Check Active Sessions**: Find `.workflow/.active-*` markers
 2. **Select Session**: If multiple found, prompt user selection
-3. **Load Session State**: Read `workflow-session.json` and `IMPL_PLAN.md`
-4. **Scan Tasks**: Analyze `.task/*.json` files for ready tasks
+3. **Load Session Metadata**: Read `workflow-session.json` ONLY (minimal context)
+4. **DO NOT read task JSONs yet** - defer until execution phase
 
-**Note**: In resume mode, this phase is completely skipped.
+**Resume Mode**: This phase is completely skipped when `--resume-session="session-id"` flag is provided.
 
-### Phase 2: Analysis (Normal Mode Only)
-1. **Dependency Resolution**: Build execution order based on `depends_on`
-2. **Status Validation**: Filter tasks with `status: "pending"` and met dependencies
-3. **Agent Assignment**: Determine agent type from `meta.agent` or `meta.type`
-4. **Context Preparation**: Load dependency summaries and inherited context
+### Phase 2: Planning Document Analysis
+**Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
 
-**Note**: In resume mode, this phase is also skipped as session analysis was already completed by `/workflow:status`.
+**Optimized to avoid reading all task JSONs upfront**
 
-### Phase 3: Planning (Resume Mode Entry Point)
-**This is where resume mode directly enters after skipping Phases 1 & 2**
+**Process**:
+1. **Read IMPL_PLAN.md**: Check existence, understand overall strategy
+2. **Read TODO_LIST.md**: Get current task statuses and execution progress
+3. **Extract Task Metadata**: Parse task IDs, titles, and dependency relationships from TODO_LIST.md
+4. **Build Execution Queue**: Determine ready tasks based on TODO_LIST.md status and dependencies
 
-1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list with status markers from session state
-2. **Mark Initial Status**: Set first pending task as `in_progress`
+**Key Optimization**: Use IMPL_PLAN.md (existence check only) and TODO_LIST.md as primary sources instead of reading all task JSONs
+
+**Resume Mode**: This phase is skipped when `--resume-session` flag is provided (session already known).
+
+### Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
+**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes (resume mode entry point)
+
+**Process**:
+1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list from TODO_LIST.md (not from task JSONs)
+   - Parse TODO_LIST.md to extract all tasks with current statuses
+   - Identify first pending task with met dependencies
+   - Generate comprehensive TodoWrite covering entire workflow
+2. **Mark Initial Status**: Set first ready task(s) as `in_progress` in TodoWrite
+   - **Sequential execution**: Mark ONE task as `in_progress`
+   - **Parallel batch**: Mark ALL tasks in current batch as `in_progress`
 3. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
-4. **Prepare Complete Task JSON**: Include pre_analysis and flow control steps for agent consumption
-5. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure all required context is available from existing session
+4. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md exist and are valid
 
 **Resume Mode Behavior**:
-- Load existing session state directly from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
-- Use session's task files and summaries without discovery
-- Generate TodoWrite from current session progress
-- Proceed immediately to agent execution
+- Load existing TODO_LIST.md directly from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
+- Extract current progress from TODO_LIST.md
+- Generate TodoWrite from TODO_LIST.md state
+- Proceed immediately to agent execution (Phase 4)
 
-### Phase 4: Execution
-1. **Pass Task with Flow Control**: Include complete task JSON with `pre_analysis` steps for agent execution
-2. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with complete context including flow control steps
-3. **Monitor Progress**: Track agent execution and handle errors without user interruption
-4. **Collect Results**: Gather implementation results and outputs
-5. **Continue Workflow**: Automatically proceed to next pending task until completion
+### Phase 4: Execution Strategy Selection & Task Execution
+**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
+
+**Step 4A: Parse Execution Strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md**
+
+Read IMPL_PLAN.md Section 4 to extract:
+- **Execution Model**: Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles
+- **Parallelization Opportunities**: Which tasks can run in parallel
+- **Serialization Requirements**: Which tasks must run sequentially
+- **Critical Path**: Priority execution order
+
+If IMPL_PLAN.md lacks execution strategy, use intelligent fallback (analyze task structure).
+
+**Step 4B: Execute Tasks with Lazy Loading**
+
+**Key Optimization**: Read task JSON **only when needed** for execution
+
+**Execution Loop Pattern**:
+```
+while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
+  next_task_id = getTodoWriteInProgressTask()
+  task_json = Read(.workflow/{session}/.task/{next_task_id}.json)  // Lazy load
+  executeTaskWithAgent(task_json)
+  updateTodoListMarkCompleted(next_task_id)
+  advanceTodoWriteToNextTask()
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Process per Task**:
+1. **Identify Next Task**: From TodoWrite, get the next `in_progress` task ID
+2. **Load Task JSON on Demand**: Read `.task/{task-id}.json` for current task ONLY
+3. **Validate Task Structure**: Ensure all 5 required fields exist (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control)
+4. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with complete context including flow control steps
+5. **Monitor Progress**: Track agent execution and handle errors without user interruption
+6. **Collect Results**: Gather implementation results and outputs
+7. **Update TODO_LIST.md**: Mark current task as completed in TODO_LIST.md
+8. **Continue Workflow**: Identify next pending task from TODO_LIST.md and repeat
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Reduces initial context loading by ~90%
+- Only reads task JSON when actually executing
+- Scales better for workflows with many tasks
+- Faster startup time for workflow execution
 
 ### Phase 5: Completion
+**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
+
+**Process**:
 1. **Update Task Status**: Mark completed tasks in JSON files
 2. **Generate Summary**: Create task summary in `.summaries/`
 3. **Update TodoWrite**: Mark current task complete, advance to next
@@ -113,28 +152,52 @@ Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implement
 5. **Check Workflow Complete**: Verify all tasks are completed
 6. **Auto-Complete Session**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all tasks finished
 
-## Task Discovery & Queue Building
+## Execution Strategy (IMPL_PLAN-Driven)
 
-### Session Discovery Process (Normal Mode)
-```
-├── Check for .active-* markers in .workflow/
-├── If multiple active sessions found → Prompt user to select
-├── Locate selected session's workflow folder
-├── Load selected session's workflow-session.json and IMPL_PLAN.md
-├── Scan selected session's .task/ directory for task JSON files
-├── Analyze task statuses and dependencies for selected session only
-└── Build execution queue of ready tasks from selected session
-```
+### Strategy Priority
 
-### Resume Mode Process (--resume-session flag)
-```
-├── Use provided session-id directly (skip discovery)
-├── Validate .workflow/{session-id}/ directory exists
-├── Load session's workflow-session.json and IMPL_PLAN.md directly
-├── Scan session's .task/ directory for task JSON files
-├── Use existing task statuses and dependencies (no re-analysis needed)
-└── Build execution queue from session state (prioritize pending/in-progress tasks)
-```
+**IMPL_PLAN-Driven Execution (Recommended)**:
+1. **Read IMPL_PLAN.md execution strategy** (Section 4: Implementation Strategy)
+2. **Follow explicit guidance**:
+   - Execution Model (Sequential/Parallel/Phased/TDD)
+   - Parallelization Opportunities (which tasks can run in parallel)
+   - Serialization Requirements (which tasks must run sequentially)
+   - Critical Path (priority execution order)
+3. **Use TODO_LIST.md for status tracking** only
+4. **IMPL_PLAN decides "HOW"**, execute.md implements it
+
+**Intelligent Fallback (When IMPL_PLAN lacks execution details)**:
+1. **Analyze task structure**:
+   - Check `meta.execution_group` in task JSONs
+   - Analyze `depends_on` relationships
+   - Understand task complexity and risk
+2. **Apply smart defaults**:
+   - No dependencies + same execution_group → Parallel
+   - Has dependencies → Sequential (wait for deps)
+   - Critical/high-risk tasks → Sequential
+3. **Conservative approach**: When uncertain, prefer sequential execution
+
+### Execution Models
+
+#### 1. Sequential Execution
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Sequential" OR no clear parallelization guidance
+**Pattern**: Execute tasks one by one in TODO_LIST order
+**TodoWrite**: ONE task marked as `in_progress` at a time
+
+#### 2. Parallel Execution
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Parallel" with clear parallelization opportunities
+**Pattern**: Execute independent task groups concurrently
+**TodoWrite**: MULTIPLE tasks (in same batch) marked as `in_progress` simultaneously
+
+#### 3. Phased Execution
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Phased" with phase breakdown
+**Pattern**: Execute tasks in phases, respect phase boundaries
+**TodoWrite**: Within each phase, follow Sequential or Parallel rules
+
+#### 4. Intelligent Fallback
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN lacks execution strategy details
+**Pattern**: Analyze task structure and apply smart defaults
+**TodoWrite**: Follow Sequential or Parallel rules based on analysis
 
 ### Task Status Logic
 ```
@@ -144,91 +207,93 @@ blocked → skip until dependencies clear
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Coordination
-**Comprehensive workflow tracking** with immediate status updates throughout entire execution without user interruption:
 
-#### TodoWrite Workflow Rules
-1. **Initial Creation**: Generate TodoWrite from discovered pending tasks for entire workflow
-   - **Normal Mode**: Create from discovery results
-   - **Resume Mode**: Create from existing session state and current progress
-2. **Single In-Progress**: Mark ONLY ONE task as `in_progress` at a time
-3. **Immediate Updates**: Update status after each task completion without user interruption
-4. **Status Synchronization**: Sync with JSON task files after updates
-5. **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
+### TodoWrite Rules (Unified)
 
-#### Resume Mode TodoWrite Generation
-**Special behavior when `--resume-session` flag is present**:
-- Load existing session progress from `.workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
-- Identify currently in-progress or next pending task
-- Generate TodoWrite starting from interruption point
-- Preserve completed task history in TodoWrite display
-- Focus on remaining pending tasks for execution
+**Rule 1: Initial Creation**
+- **Normal Mode**: Generate TodoWrite from discovered pending tasks for entire workflow
+- **Resume Mode**: Generate from existing session state and current progress
 
-#### TodoWrite Tool Usage
-**Use Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite tool** to track workflow progress in real-time:
+**Rule 2: In-Progress Task Count (Execution-Model-Dependent)**
+- **Sequential execution**: Mark ONLY ONE task as `in_progress` at a time
+- **Parallel batch execution**: Mark ALL tasks in current batch as `in_progress` simultaneously
+- **Execution group indicator**: Show `[execution_group: group-id]` for parallel tasks
 
+**Rule 3: Status Updates**
+- **Immediate Updates**: Update status after each task/batch completion without user interruption
+- **Status Synchronization**: Sync with JSON task files after updates
+- **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
+
+**Rule 4: Workflow Completion Check**
+- When all tasks marked `completed`, auto-call `/workflow:session:complete`
+
+### TodoWrite Tool Usage
+
+**Example 1: Sequential Execution**
 ```javascript
-// Create initial todo list from discovered pending tasks
 TodoWrite({
   todos: [
     {
       content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "pending",
+      status: "in_progress",  // ONE task in progress
       activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema"
     },
     {
       content: "Execute IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute TEST-FIX-1: Validate implementation tests [test-fix-agent]",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing TEST-FIX-1: Validate implementation tests"
     }
   ]
 });
-
-// Update status as tasks progress - ONLY ONE task should be in_progress at a time
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {
-      content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Mark current task as in_progress
-      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema"
-    },
-    // ... other tasks remain pending
-  ]
-});
 ```
 
-**TodoWrite Integration Rules**:
-- **Continuous Workflow Tracking**: Use TodoWrite tool throughout entire workflow execution
-- **Real-time Updates**: Immediate progress tracking without user interruption
-- **Single Active Task**: Only ONE task marked as `in_progress` at any time
-- **Immediate Completion**: Mark tasks `completed` immediately after finishing
-- **Status Sync**: Sync TodoWrite status with JSON task files after each update
-- **Full Execution**: Continue TodoWrite tracking until all workflow tasks complete
-- **Workflow Completion Check**: When all tasks marked `completed`, auto-call `/workflow:session:complete`
+**Example 2: Parallel Batch Execution**
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Build Auth API [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-auth-api]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Batch task 1
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Build Auth API"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-1.2: Build User UI [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-ui-comp]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Batch task 2 (running concurrently)
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Build User UI"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-1.3: Setup Database [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-db-schema]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Batch task 3 (running concurrently)
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.3: Setup Database"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-2.1: Integration Tests [test-fix-agent] [depends_on: IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2, IMPL-1.3]",
+      status: "pending",  // Next batch (waits for current batch completion)
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-2.1: Integration Tests"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
 
-#### TODO_LIST.md Update Timing
-- **Before Agent Launch**: Update TODO_LIST.md to mark task as `in_progress` (⚠️)
-- **After Task Complete**: Update TODO_LIST.md to mark as `completed` (✅), advance to next
-- **On Error**: Keep as `in_progress` in TODO_LIST.md, add error note
-- **Workflow Complete**: When all tasks completed, call `/workflow:session:complete`
-- **Session End**: Sync all TODO_LIST.md statuses with JSON task files
+### TODO_LIST.md Update Timing
+**Single source of truth for task status** - enables lazy loading by providing task metadata without reading JSONs
 
-### 3. Agent Context Management
-**Comprehensive context preparation** for autonomous agent execution:
+- **Before Agent Launch**: Mark task as `in_progress`
+- **After Task Complete**: Mark as `completed`, advance to next
+- **On Error**: Keep as `in_progress`, add error note
+- **Workflow Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete`
 
-#### Context Sources (Priority Order)
+## Agent Context Management
+
+### Context Sources (Priority Order)
 1. **Complete Task JSON**: Full task definition including all fields and artifacts
-2. **Artifacts Context**: Brainstorming outputs and synthesis specifications from task.context.artifacts
+2. **Artifacts Context**: Brainstorming outputs and role analyses from task.context.artifacts
 3. **Flow Control Context**: Accumulated outputs from pre_analysis steps (including artifact loading)
 4. **Dependency Summaries**: Previous task completion summaries
 5. **Session Context**: Workflow paths and session metadata
 6. **Inherited Context**: Parent task context and shared variables
 
-#### Context Assembly Process
+### Context Assembly Process
 ```
 1. Load Task JSON → Base context (including artifacts array)
 2. Load Artifacts → Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs
@@ -238,15 +303,15 @@ TodoWrite({
 6. Combine All → Complete agent context with artifact integration
 ```
 
-#### Agent Context Package Structure
+### Agent Context Package Structure
 ```json
 {
   "task": { /* Complete task JSON with artifacts array */ },
   "artifacts": {
-    "synthesis_specification": { "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md", "priority": "highest" },
-    "topic_framework": { "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md", "priority": "medium" },
-    "role_analyses": [ /* Individual role analysis files */ ],
-    "available_artifacts": [ /* All detected brainstorming artifacts */ ]
+    "synthesis_specification": { "path": "{{from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output.path}}", "priority": "highest" },
+    "guidance_specification": { "path": "{{from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.guidance_specification.path}}", "priority": "medium" },
+    "role_analyses": [ /* From context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[] */ ],
+    "conflict_resolution": { "path": "{{from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path}}", "conditional": true }
   },
   "flow_context": {
     "step_outputs": {
@@ -258,7 +323,7 @@ TodoWrite({
   },
   "session": {
     "workflow_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/",
-    "brainstorming_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/",
+    "context_package_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.process/context-package.json",
     "todo_list_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/TODO_LIST.md",
     "summaries_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/",
     "task_json_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.task/IMPL-1.1.json"
@@ -268,99 +333,73 @@ TodoWrite({
 }
 ```
 
-#### Context Validation Rules
+### Context Validation Rules
 - **Task JSON Complete**: All 5 fields present and valid, including artifacts array in context
-- **Artifacts Available**: Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs accessible
+- **Artifacts Available**: All artifacts loaded from context-package.json
 - **Flow Control Ready**: All pre_analysis steps completed including artifact loading steps
 - **Dependencies Loaded**: All depends_on summaries available
-- **Session Paths Valid**: All workflow paths exist and accessible, including .brainstorming directory
+- **Session Paths Valid**: All workflow paths exist and accessible (verified via context-package.json)
 - **Agent Assignment**: Valid agent type specified in meta.agent
 
-### 4. Agent Execution Pattern
-**Structured agent invocation** with complete context and clear instructions:
+## Agent Execution Pattern
 
-#### Agent Prompt Template
+### Flow Control Execution
+**[FLOW_CONTROL]** marker indicates task JSON contains `flow_control.pre_analysis` steps for context preparation.
+
+**Orchestrator Responsibility**:
+- Pass complete task JSON to agent (including `flow_control` block)
+- Provide session paths for artifact access
+- Monitor agent completion
+
+**Agent Responsibility**:
+- Parse `flow_control.pre_analysis` array from JSON
+- Execute steps sequentially with variable substitution
+- Accumulate context from artifacts and dependencies
+- Follow error handling per `step.on_error`
+- Complete implementation using accumulated context
+
+**Orchestrator does NOT execute flow control steps - Agent interprets and executes them from JSON.**
+
+### Agent Prompt Template
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
-     prompt="**TASK EXECUTION WITH FULL JSON LOADING**
+     prompt="**EXECUTE TASK FROM JSON**
 
-     ## STEP 1: Load Complete Task JSON
-     **MANDATORY**: First load the complete task JSON from: {session.task_json_path}
+     ## Task JSON Location
+     {session.task_json_path}
 
-     cat {session.task_json_path}
+     ## Instructions
+     1. **Load Complete Task JSON**: Read and validate all fields (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control)
+     2. **Execute Flow Control**: If `flow_control.pre_analysis` exists, execute steps sequentially:
+        - Load artifacts (role analysis documents, role analyses) using commands in each step
+        - Accumulate context from step outputs using variable substitution [variable_name]
+        - Handle errors per step.on_error (skip_optional | fail | retry_once)
+     3. **Implement Solution**: Follow `flow_control.implementation_approach` using accumulated context
+     4. **Complete Task**:
+        - Update task status: `jq '.status = \"completed\"' {session.task_json_path} > temp.json && mv temp.json {session.task_json_path}`
+        - Update TODO_LIST.md: Mark task as [x] completed in {session.todo_list_path}
+        - Generate summary: {session.summaries_dir}/{task.id}-summary.md
+        - Check workflow completion and call `/workflow:session:complete` if all tasks done
 
-     **CRITICAL**: Validate all 5 required fields are present:
-     - id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control
+     ## Context Sources (All from JSON)
+     - Requirements: `context.requirements`
+     - Focus Paths: `context.focus_paths`
+     - Acceptance: `context.acceptance`
+     - Artifacts: `context.artifacts` (synthesis specs, brainstorming outputs)
+     - Dependencies: `context.depends_on`
+     - Target Files: `flow_control.target_files`
 
-     ## STEP 2: Task Definition (From Loaded JSON)
-     **ID**: Use id field from JSON
-     **Title**: Use title field from JSON
-     **Type**: Use meta.type field from JSON
-     **Agent**: Use meta.agent field from JSON
-     **Status**: Verify status is pending or active
+     ## Session Paths
+     - Workflow Dir: {session.workflow_dir}
+     - TODO List: {session.todo_list_path}
+     - Summaries: {session.summaries_dir}
+     - Flow Context: {flow_context.step_outputs}
 
-     ## STEP 3: Flow Control Execution (if flow_control.pre_analysis exists)
-     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute pre_analysis steps sequentially from loaded JSON:
-
-     **PRIORITY: Artifact Loading Steps First**
-     1. **Load Synthesis Specification** (if present): Priority artifact loading for consolidated design
-     2. **Load Individual Artifacts** (fallback): Load role-specific brainstorming outputs if synthesis unavailable
-     3. **Execute Remaining Steps**: Continue with other pre_analysis steps
-
-     For each step in flow_control.pre_analysis array:
-     1. Execute step.command/commands with variable substitution (support both single command and commands array)
-     2. Store output to step.output_to variable
-     3. Handle errors per step.on_error strategy (skip_optional, fail, retry_once)
-     4. Pass accumulated variables to next step including artifact context
-
-     **Special Artifact Loading Commands**:
-     - Use `bash(ls path 2>/dev/null || echo 'file not found')` for artifact existence checks
-     - Use `Read(path)` for loading artifact content
-     - Use `find` commands for discovering multiple artifact files
-     - Reference artifacts in subsequent steps using output variables: [synthesis_specification], [individual_artifacts]
-
-     ## STEP 4: Implementation Context (From JSON context field)
-     **Requirements**: Use context.requirements array from JSON
-     **Focus Paths**: Use context.focus_paths array from JSON
-     **Acceptance Criteria**: Use context.acceptance array from JSON
-     **Dependencies**: Use context.depends_on array from JSON
-     **Parent Context**: Use context.inherited object from JSON
-     **Artifacts**: Use context.artifacts array from JSON (synthesis specifications, brainstorming outputs)
-     **Target Files**: Use flow_control.target_files array from JSON
-     **Implementation Approach**: Use flow_control.implementation_approach object from JSON (with artifact integration)
-
-     ## STEP 5: Session Context (Provided by workflow:execute)
-     **Workflow Directory**: {session.workflow_dir}
-     **TODO List Path**: {session.todo_list_path}
-     **Summaries Directory**: {session.summaries_dir}
-     **Task JSON Path**: {session.task_json_path}
-     **Flow Context**: {flow_context.step_outputs}
-
-     ## STEP 6: Agent Completion Requirements
-     1. **Load Task JSON**: Read and validate complete task structure
-     2. **Execute Flow Control**: Run all pre_analysis steps if present
-     3. **Implement Solution**: Follow implementation_approach from JSON
-     4. **Update Progress**: Mark task status in JSON as completed
-     5. **Update TODO List**: Update TODO_LIST.md at provided path
-     6. **Generate Summary**: Create completion summary in summaries directory
-     7. **Check Workflow Complete**: After task completion, check if all workflow tasks done
-     8. **Auto-Complete Session**: If all tasks completed, call SlashCommand(\"/workflow:session:complete\")
-
-     **JSON UPDATE COMMAND**:
-     Update task status to completed using jq:
-     jq '.status = \"completed\"' {session.task_json_path} > temp.json && mv temp.json {session.task_json_path}
-
-     **WORKFLOW COMPLETION CHECK**:
-     After updating task status, check if workflow is complete:
-     total_tasks=\$(find .workflow/*/\.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-     completed_tasks=\$(find .workflow/*/\.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-     if [ \$total_tasks -eq \$completed_tasks ]; then
-       SlashCommand(command=\"/workflow:session:complete\")
-     fi"),
-     description="Execute task with full JSON loading and validation")
+     **Complete JSON structure is authoritative - load and follow it exactly.**"),
+     description="Execute task: {task.id}")
 ```
 
-#### Agent JSON Loading Specification
+### Agent JSON Loading Specification
 **MANDATORY AGENT PROTOCOL**: All agents must follow this exact loading sequence:
 
 1. **JSON Loading**: First action must be `cat {session.task_json_path}`
@@ -381,7 +420,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
   "status": "pending|active|completed|blocked",
   "meta": {
     "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
-    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
+    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@universal-executor"
   },
   "context": {
     "requirements": ["req1", "req2"],
@@ -392,15 +431,16 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
     "artifacts": [
       {
         "type": "synthesis_specification",
-        "source": "brainstorm_synthesis",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+        "source": "context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output",
+        "path": "{{loaded dynamically from context-package.json}}",
         "priority": "highest",
         "contains": "complete_integrated_specification"
       },
       {
         "type": "individual_role_analysis",
-        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md",
+        "source": "context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[]",
+        "path": "{{loaded dynamically from context-package.json}}",
+        "note": "Supports analysis*.md pattern (analysis.md, analysis-01.md, analysis-api.md, etc.)",
         "priority": "low",
         "contains": "role_specific_analysis_fallback"
       }
@@ -410,10 +450,11 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
     "pre_analysis": [
       {
         "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
-        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification from brainstorming",
+        "action": "Load synthesis specification from context-package.json",
         "commands": [
-          "bash(ls .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'synthesis specification not found')",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)"
+          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/context-package.json)",
+          "Extract(brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output.path)",
+          "Read(extracted path)"
         ],
         "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
@@ -428,16 +469,16 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
     "implementation_approach": [
       {
         "step": 1,
-        "title": "Implement task following synthesis specification",
-        "description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+        "title": "Implement task following role analyses",
+        "description": "Implement '[title]' following role analyses. PRIORITY: Use role analysis documents as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
         "modification_points": [
-          "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
+          "Apply consolidated requirements from role analysis documents",
           "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
           "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
           "Integrate with existing patterns"
         ],
         "logic_flow": [
-          "Load synthesis specification",
+          "Load role analyses",
           "Parse architecture and requirements",
           "Implement following specification",
           "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
@@ -452,7 +493,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
 }
 ```
 
-#### Execution Flow
+### Execution Flow
 1. **Load Task JSON**: Agent reads and validates complete JSON structure
 2. **Execute Flow Control**: Agent runs pre_analysis steps if present
 3. **Prepare Implementation**: Agent uses implementation_approach from JSON
@@ -460,23 +501,17 @@ Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
 5. **Update Status**: Agent marks JSON status as completed
 6. **Generate Summary**: Agent creates completion summary
 
-#### Agent Assignment Rules
+### Agent Assignment Rules
 ```
 meta.agent specified → Use specified agent
 meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
   - "feature" → @code-developer
   - "test-gen" → @code-developer
   - "test-fix" → @test-fix-agent
-  - "review" → @general-purpose
+  - "review" → @universal-executor
   - "docs" → @doc-generator
 ```
 
-#### Error Handling During Execution
-- **Agent Failure**: Retry once with adjusted context
-- **Flow Control Error**: Skip optional steps, fail on critical
-- **Context Missing**: Reload from JSON files and retry
-- **Timeout**: Mark as blocked, continue with next task
-
 ## Workflow File Structure Reference
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/
@@ -490,78 +525,26 @@ meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
 │   ├── IMPL-1-summary.md    # Task completion details
 │   └── IMPL-1.1-summary.md  # Subtask completion details
 └── .process/                # Planning artifacts
+    ├── context-package.json # Smart context package
     └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md  # Planning analysis results
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling & Recovery
 
-### Discovery Phase Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution | Command |
-|-------|-------|------------|---------|
-| No active session | No `.active-*` markers found | Create or resume session | `/workflow:plan "project"` |
-| Multiple sessions | Multiple `.active-*` markers | Select specific session | Manual choice prompt |
-| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure | `/workflow:session:status --validate` |
-| Missing task files | Broken task references | Regenerate tasks | `/task:create` or repair |
+### Common Errors & Recovery
 
-### Execution Phase Errors
-| Error | Cause | Recovery Strategy | Max Attempts |
-|-------|-------|------------------|--------------|
+| Error Type | Cause | Recovery Strategy | Max Attempts |
+|-----------|-------|------------------|--------------|
+| **Discovery Errors** |
+| No active session | No `.active-*` markers found | Create or resume session: `/workflow:plan "project"` | N/A |
+| Multiple sessions | Multiple `.active-*` markers | Prompt user selection | N/A |
+| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure or validate files | N/A |
+| **Execution Errors** |
 | Agent failure | Agent crash/timeout | Retry with simplified context | 2 |
 | Flow control error | Command failure | Skip optional, fail critical | 1 per step |
 | Context loading error | Missing dependencies | Reload from JSON, use defaults | 3 |
 | JSON file corruption | File system issues | Restore from backup/recreate | 1 |
 
-### Recovery Procedures
-
-#### Session Recovery
-```bash
-# Check session integrity
-find .workflow -name ".active-*" | while read marker; do
-  session=$(basename "$marker" | sed 's/^\.active-//')
-  if [ ! -d ".workflow/$session" ]; then
-    echo "Removing orphaned marker: $marker"
-    rm "$marker"
-  fi
-done
-
-# Recreate corrupted session files
-if [ ! -f ".workflow/$session/workflow-session.json" ]; then
-  echo '{"session_id":"'$session'","status":"active"}' > ".workflow/$session/workflow-session.json"
-fi
-```
-
-#### Task Recovery
-```bash
-# Validate task JSON integrity
-for task_file in .workflow/$session/.task/*.json; do
-  if ! jq empty "$task_file" 2>/dev/null; then
-    echo "Corrupted task file: $task_file"
-    # Backup and regenerate or restore from backup
-  fi
-done
-
-# Fix missing dependencies
-missing_deps=$(jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' .workflow/$session/.task/*.json | sort -u)
-for dep in $missing_deps; do
-  if [ ! -f ".workflow/$session/.task/$dep.json" ]; then
-    echo "Missing dependency: $dep - creating placeholder"
-  fi
-done
-```
-
-#### Context Recovery
-```bash
-# Reload context from available sources
-if [ -f ".workflow/$session/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md" ]; then
-  echo "Reloading planning context..."
-fi
-
-# Restore from documentation if available
-if [ -d ".workflow/docs/" ]; then
-  echo "Using documentation context as fallback..."
-fi
-```
-
 ### Error Prevention
 - **Pre-flight Checks**: Validate session integrity before execution
 - **Backup Strategy**: Create task snapshots before major operations
@@ -569,16 +552,31 @@ fi
 - **Dependency Validation**: Check all depends_on references exist
 - **Context Verification**: Ensure all required context is available
 
-## Usage Examples
+### Recovery Procedures
 
-### Basic Usage
+**Session Recovery**:
 ```bash
-/workflow:execute          # Execute all pending tasks autonomously
-/workflow:session:status           # Check progress
-/task:execute IMPL-1.2     # Execute specific task
+# Check session integrity
+find .workflow -name ".active-*" | while read marker; do
+  session=$(basename "$marker" | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+  [ ! -d ".workflow/$session" ] && rm "$marker"
+done
+
+# Recreate corrupted session files
+[ ! -f ".workflow/$session/workflow-session.json" ] && \
+  echo '{"session_id":"'$session'","status":"active"}' > ".workflow/$session/workflow-session.json"
 ```
 
-### Integration
-- **Planning**: `/workflow:plan` → `/workflow:execute` → `/workflow:review`
-- **Recovery**: `/workflow:status --validate` → `/workflow:execute`
+**Task Recovery**:
+```bash
+# Validate task JSON integrity
+for task_file in .workflow/$session/.task/*.json; do
+  jq empty "$task_file" 2>/dev/null || echo "Corrupted: $task_file"
+done
 
+# Fix missing dependencies
+missing_deps=$(jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' .workflow/$session/.task/*.json | sort -u)
+for dep in $missing_deps; do
+  [ ! -f ".workflow/$session/.task/$dep.json" ] && echo "Missing dependency: $dep"
+done
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/lite-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,871 @@
+---
+name: lite-plan
+description: Lightweight interactive planning and execution workflow with in-memory planning, code exploration, and immediate execution after user confirmation
+argument-hint: "[--tool claude|gemini|qwen|codex] [-e|--explore] \"task description\"|file.md"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), Bash(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
+timeout: 180000
+color: cyan
+---
+
+# Workflow Lite-Plan Command (/workflow:lite-plan)
+
+## Overview
+
+Intelligent lightweight planning and execution command with dynamic workflow adaptation based on task complexity.
+
+## Core Functionality
+
+- **Intelligent Task Analysis**: Automatically determines if exploration/planning agents are needed
+- **Dynamic Exploration**: Calls cli-explore-agent only when task requires codebase understanding
+- **Interactive Clarification**: Asks follow-up questions after exploration to gather missing information
+- **Adaptive Planning**:
+  - Simple tasks: Direct planning by current Claude
+  - Complex tasks: Delegates to cli-planning-agent for detailed breakdown
+- **Two-Step Confirmation**: First display complete plan as text, then collect three-dimensional input (task approval + execution method + code review tool)
+- **Direct Execution**: Immediate dispatch to selected execution method (agent/codex/auto)
+- **Live Progress Tracking**: Real-time TodoWrite updates at execution call level ([Agent-1], [Codex-1], etc.) during execution
+- **Optional Code Review**: Post-execution quality analysis with gemini/agent or custom tools via "Other" option (e.g., qwen, codex)
+
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-plan [FLAGS] <TASK_DESCRIPTION>
+
+# Flags
+-e, --explore              Force code exploration phase (overrides auto-detection logic)
+
+# Arguments
+<task-description>         Task description or path to .md file (required)
+```
+
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Workflow Overview
+
+```
+User Input ("/workflow:lite-plan \"task\"")
+    |
+    v
+[Phase 1] Task Analysis & Exploration Decision (10-20 seconds)
+    -> Analyze task description
+    -> Decision: Need exploration? (Yes/No)
+    -> If Yes: Launch cli-explore-agent
+    -> Output: exploration findings (if performed)
+    |
+    v
+[Phase 2] Clarification (Optional, user interaction)
+    -> If exploration revealed ambiguities or missing info
+    -> AskUserQuestion: Gather clarifications
+    -> Update task context with user responses
+    -> If no clarification needed: Skip to Phase 3
+    |
+    v
+[Phase 3] Complexity Assessment & Planning (20-60 seconds)
+    -> Assess task complexity (Low/Medium/High)
+    -> Decision: Planning strategy
+       - Low: Direct planning (current Claude)
+       - Medium/High: Delegate to cli-planning-agent
+    -> Output: Task breakdown with execution approach
+    |
+    v
+[Phase 4] Task Confirmation & Execution Selection (User interaction)
+    -> Step 4.1: Output complete plan as text to user
+    -> Step 4.2: AskUserQuestion with three dimensions
+       1. Confirm task: Allow/Modify/Cancel (multi-select, can supplement via Other)
+       2. Execution method: Agent/Codex/Auto (single-select, auto: simple→agent, complex→codex)
+       3. Code review: Skip/Gemini/Agent/Other (single-select, can specify custom tool via Other)
+    -> Process selections and proceed to Phase 5
+    -> If cancel: Exit
+    |
+    v
+[Phase 5] Execution & Progress Tracking
+    -> Create TodoWrite execution call list (grouped tasks)
+    -> Launch selected execution (agent or CLI)
+    -> Track execution call progress with TodoWrite updates
+    -> Real-time call status displayed to user (e.g., "[Agent-1] (Task A + Task B)")
+    -> If code review enabled: Run selected CLI analysis
+    |
+    v
+Execution Complete
+```
+
+### Task Management Pattern
+
+- TodoWrite creates execution call list before execution starts (Phase 5)
+- Execution calls ([Agent-1], [Codex-1], etc.) marked as in_progress/completed during execution
+- Each execution call handles multiple related tasks
+- Real-time progress updates visible at call level (not individual task level)
+- No intermediate file artifacts generated
+
+## Detailed Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Task Analysis & Exploration Decision
+
+**Operations**:
+- Analyze task description to determine if code exploration is needed
+- Decision logic:
+  ```javascript
+  needsExploration = (
+    flags.includes('--explore') || flags.includes('-e') ||  // Force exploration if flag present
+    (
+      task.mentions_specific_files ||
+      task.requires_codebase_context ||
+      task.needs_architecture_understanding ||
+      task.modifies_existing_code
+    )
+  )
+  ```
+
+**Decision Criteria**:
+
+| Task Type | Needs Exploration | Reason |
+|-----------|-------------------|--------|
+| Any task with `-e` or `--explore` flag | **Yes (forced)** | **Flag overrides auto-detection logic** |
+| "Implement new feature X" | Maybe | Depends on integration with existing code |
+| "Refactor module Y" | Yes | Needs understanding of current implementation |
+| "Add tests for Z" | Yes | Needs to understand code structure |
+| "Create new standalone utility" | No | Self-contained, no existing code context |
+| "Update documentation" | No | Doesn't require code exploration |
+| "Fix bug in function F" | Yes | Needs to understand implementation |
+
+**If Exploration Needed**:
+- Launch cli-explore-agent with task-specific focus
+- Agent call format:
+  ```javascript
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+    description="Analyze codebase for task context",
+    prompt=`
+    Task: ${task_description}
+
+    Analyze and return the following information in structured format:
+    1. Project Structure: Overall architecture and module organization
+    2. Relevant Files: List of files that will be affected by this task (with paths)
+    3. Current Implementation Patterns: Existing code patterns, conventions, and styles
+    4. Dependencies: External dependencies and internal module dependencies
+    5. Integration Points: Where this task connects with existing code
+    6. Architecture Constraints: Technical limitations or requirements
+    7. Clarification Needs: Ambiguities or missing information requiring user input
+
+    Time Limit: 60 seconds
+
+    Output Format: Return a JSON-like structured object with the above fields populated.
+    Include specific file paths, pattern examples, and clear questions for clarifications.
+    `
+  )
+  ```
+
+**Expected Return Structure**:
+```javascript
+explorationContext = {
+  project_structure: "Description of overall architecture",
+  relevant_files: ["src/auth/service.ts", "src/middleware/auth.ts", ...],
+  patterns: "Description of existing patterns (e.g., 'Uses dependency injection pattern', 'React hooks convention')",
+  dependencies: "List of dependencies and integration points",
+  integration_points: "Where this connects with existing code",
+  constraints: "Technical constraints (e.g., 'Must use existing auth library', 'No breaking changes')",
+  clarification_needs: [
+    {
+      question: "Which authentication method to use?",
+      context: "Found both JWT and Session patterns",
+      options: ["JWT tokens", "Session-based", "Hybrid approach"]
+    },
+    // ... more clarification questions
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Output Processing**:
+- Store exploration findings in `explorationContext`
+- Extract `clarification_needs` array from exploration results
+- Set `needsClarification = (clarification_needs.length > 0)`
+- Use clarification_needs to generate Phase 2 questions
+
+**Progress Tracking**:
+- Mark Phase 1 as completed
+- If needsClarification: Mark Phase 2 as in_progress
+- Else: Skip to Phase 3
+
+**Expected Duration**: 10-20 seconds (analysis) + 30-60 seconds (exploration if needed)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Clarification (Optional)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Only run if Phase 1 set `needsClarification = true`
+
+**Operations**:
+- Review `explorationContext.clarification_needs` from Phase 1
+- Generate AskUserQuestion based on exploration findings
+- Focus on ambiguities that affect implementation approach
+
+**AskUserQuestion Call** (simplified reference):
+```javascript
+// Use clarification_needs from exploration to build questions
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: explorationContext.clarification_needs.map(need => ({
+    question: `${need.context}\n\n${need.question}`,
+    header: "Clarification",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: need.options.map(opt => ({
+      label: opt,
+      description: `Use ${opt} approach`
+    }))
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+**Output Processing**:
+- Collect user responses and store in `clarificationContext`
+- Format: `{ question_id: selected_answer, ... }`
+- This context will be passed to Phase 3 planning
+
+**Progress Tracking**:
+- Mark Phase 2 as completed
+- Mark Phase 3 as in_progress
+
+**Expected Duration**: User-dependent (typically 30-60 seconds)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Complexity Assessment & Planning
+
+**Operations**:
+- Assess task complexity based on multiple factors
+- Select appropriate planning strategy
+- Generate task breakdown using selected method
+
+**Complexity Assessment Factors**:
+```javascript
+complexityScore = {
+  file_count: exploration.files_to_modify.length,
+  integration_points: exploration.dependencies.length,
+  architecture_changes: exploration.requires_architecture_change,
+  technology_stack: exploration.unfamiliar_technologies.length,
+  task_scope: (task.estimated_steps > 5),
+  cross_cutting_concerns: exploration.affects_multiple_modules
+}
+
+// Calculate complexity
+if (complexityScore < 3) complexity = "Low"
+else if (complexityScore < 6) complexity = "Medium"
+else complexity = "High"
+```
+
+**Complexity Levels**:
+
+| Level | Characteristics | Planning Strategy |
+|-------|----------------|-------------------|
+| Low | 1-2 files, simple changes, clear requirements | Direct planning (current Claude) |
+| Medium | 3-5 files, moderate integration, some ambiguity | Delegate to cli-planning-agent |
+| High | 6+ files, complex architecture, high uncertainty | Delegate to cli-planning-agent with detailed analysis |
+
+**Planning Execution**:
+
+**Option A: Direct Planning (Low Complexity)**
+
+Current Claude generates plan directly following these guidelines:
+- **Summary**: 2-3 sentence overview of the implementation
+- **Approach**: High-level implementation strategy
+- **Task Breakdown**: 3-5 specific, actionable tasks with file paths
+- **Estimated Time**: Total implementation time estimate
+- **Recommended Execution**: "Agent" (for Low complexity tasks)
+
+**Option B: Agent-Based Planning (Medium/High Complexity)**
+
+Delegate to cli-planning-agent with detailed requirements:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-planning-agent",
+  description="Generate detailed implementation plan",
+  prompt=`
+  Task: ${task_description}
+  Exploration Context: ${JSON.stringify(explorationContext, null, 2)}
+  User Clarifications: ${JSON.stringify(clarificationContext, null, 2) || "None provided"}
+  Complexity Level: ${complexity}
+
+  Generate a detailed implementation plan with the following components:
+
+  1. Summary: 2-3 sentence overview of the implementation
+  2. Approach: High-level implementation strategy
+  3. Task Breakdown: 5-10 specific, actionable tasks
+     - Each task should specify: What to do, Which files to modify/create, Dependencies on other tasks (if any)
+  4. Task Dependencies & Parallelization:
+     - Identify independent tasks that can run in parallel (no shared file conflicts or logical dependencies)
+     - Group tasks by execution order: parallel groups can execute simultaneously, sequential groups must wait for previous completion
+     - Format: "Group 1 (parallel): Task 1, Task 2 | Group 2 (parallel): Task 3, Task 4 | Task 5 (depends on all)"
+  5. Risks: Potential issues and mitigation strategies (for Medium/High complexity)
+  6. Estimated Time: Total implementation time estimate
+  7. Recommended Execution: "Agent" or "Codex" based on task complexity
+
+  Ensure tasks are specific, with file paths and clear acceptance criteria.
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Expected Return Structure (Both Options)**:
+```javascript
+planObject = {
+  summary: string,              // 2-3 sentence overview
+  approach: string,             // High-level implementation strategy
+  tasks: string[],              // 3-5 tasks (Low) or 5-10 tasks (Medium/High) with file paths
+  dependencies: string[],       // Task execution order: parallel groups and sequential dependencies (Medium/High only)
+  risks: string[],              // Potential issues and mitigation strategies (Medium/High only)
+  estimated_time: string,       // Total implementation time estimate
+  recommended_execution: string, // "Agent" (Low) or "Codex" (Medium/High)
+  complexity: string            // "Low" | "Medium" | "High"
+}
+```
+
+**Progress Tracking**:
+- Mark Phase 3 as completed
+- Mark Phase 4 as in_progress
+
+**Expected Duration**:
+- Low complexity: 20-30 seconds (direct)
+- Medium/High complexity: 40-60 seconds (agent-based)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Task Confirmation & Execution Selection
+
+**User Interaction Flow**: Two-step confirmation process
+
+**Step 4.1: Display Plan Summary**
+
+First, output the complete plan to the user as regular text:
+
+```
+## Implementation Plan
+
+**Summary**: ${planObject.summary}
+
+**Approach**: ${planObject.approach}
+
+**Task Breakdown**:
+${planObject.tasks.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t}`).join('\n')}
+
+${planObject.dependencies ? `\n**Dependencies**:\n${planObject.dependencies.join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+${planObject.risks ? `\n**Risks**:\n${planObject.risks.join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+**Complexity**: ${planObject.complexity}
+**Estimated Time**: ${planObject.estimated_time}
+**Recommended Execution**: ${planObject.recommended_execution}
+```
+
+**Step 4.2: Collect User Confirmation**
+
+After displaying the plan, collect three inputs via AskUserQuestion:
+
+**Operations**:
+- Collect three inputs:
+  1. Task confirmation (multi-select: Allow/Modify/Cancel + optional supplements via "Other")
+  2. Execution method (single-select: Agent/Codex/Auto)
+     - Agent: Execute with @code-developer
+     - Codex: Execute with codex CLI tool
+     - Auto: Simple tasks (Low complexity) → Agent, Complex tasks (Medium/High) → Codex
+  3. Code review tool (single-select: Skip/Gemini/Agent + custom tools via "Other")
+     - Gemini Review: Use gemini CLI for code analysis
+     - Agent Review: Use @code-reviewer agent
+     - Other: Specify custom tool (e.g., "qwen", "codex") via text input
+- Support plan supplements and custom tool specification via "Other" input
+
+**Three Questions in Single AskUserQuestion Call**:
+- Question 1: Task confirmation (multi-select: Allow/Modify/Cancel)
+- Question 2: Execution method selection (single-select: Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- Question 3: Code review tool selection (single-select: Skip/Gemini/Agent, custom via "Other")
+
+**AskUserQuestion Call**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: `**Plan Summary**: ${planObject.summary}
+
+**Tasks**: ${planObject.tasks.length} tasks | **Complexity**: ${planObject.complexity} | **Estimated Time**: ${planObject.estimated_time}
+
+Confirm this plan? (Multi-select enabled - you can select multiple options and add supplements via "Other")`,
+      header: "Confirm Plan",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Allow", description: "Proceed with plan as-is" },
+        { label: "Modify", description: "Adjust plan before execution" },
+        { label: "Cancel", description: "Abort workflow" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: `Select execution method:`,
+      header: "Execution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Agent", description: "Execute with @code-developer agent" },
+        { label: "Codex", description: "Execute with codex CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Auto", description: `Auto-select: ${planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'Agent (Low complexity)' : 'Codex (Medium/High complexity)'}` }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: `Enable code review after execution?
+
+(You can specify other tools like "qwen" or "codex" via "Other" option)`,
+      header: "Code Review",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Review with Gemini CLI tool (gemini-2.5-pro)" },
+        { label: "Agent Review", description: "Review with @code-reviewer agent" },
+        { label: "Skip", description: "No review needed" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+**Decision Flow**:
+```
+Task Confirmation (Multi-select):
+  ├─ Allow (+ optional supplements in Other) → Proceed to Execution Method Selection
+  ├─ Modify (+ optional supplements in Other) → Re-run Phase 3 with modifications
+  └─ Cancel → Exit (no execution)
+
+Execution Method Selection (Single-select):
+  ├─ Agent → Launch @code-developer agent
+  ├─ Codex → Execute with codex CLI tool
+  └─ Auto → Automatic selection:
+      ├─ If complexity = Low → Launch @code-developer agent
+      └─ If complexity = Medium/High → Execute with codex CLI tool
+
+Code Review Selection (after execution):
+  ├─ Skip → Skip review, workflow complete
+  ├─ Gemini Review → Run gemini code analysis (gemini-2.5-pro)
+  ├─ Agent Review → Current Claude agent review
+  └─ Other → Specify custom tool (e.g., "qwen", "codex") via text input
+```
+
+**Progress Tracking**:
+- Mark Phase 4 as completed
+- Mark Phase 5 as in_progress
+
+**Expected Duration**: User-dependent (1-3 minutes typical)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Execution & Progress Tracking
+
+**Operations**:
+- Create TodoWrite execution call list (grouped tasks by dependencies)
+- Launch selected execution method (agent or CLI)
+- Track execution call progress with real-time TodoWrite updates (not individual tasks)
+- Display execution status to user
+
+**Step 5.1: Create TodoWrite Execution List**
+
+**Before execution starts**, create execution call list (not individual tasks):
+```javascript
+// Group tasks based on dependencies and execution strategy
+// Each execution call handles multiple related tasks
+executionCalls = groupTasksByExecution(planObject.tasks, planObject.dependencies)
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: executionCalls.map((call, index) => ({
+    content: `[${call.method}-${index+1}] (${call.taskSummary})`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Executing [${call.method}-${index+1}] (${call.taskSummary})`
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+**Example Execution List**:
+```
+[ ] [Agent-1] (Implement auth service + Create JWT utilities)
+[ ] [Agent-2] (Add middleware + Update routes)
+[ ] [Codex-1] (Add integration tests for auth flow)
+```
+
+**Task Grouping Logic**:
+- Parallel tasks → Single execution call
+- Sequential tasks → Separate execution calls
+- Complex tasks → May split into multiple calls based on file scope
+
+**Step 5.2: Launch Execution**
+
+**IMPORTANT**: CLI execution MUST run in foreground (no background execution)
+
+Based on user selection in Phase 4, execute appropriate method:
+- **Agent**: Launch @code-developer agent
+- **Codex**: Execute with codex CLI tool
+- **Auto**: Automatic selection based on complexity
+  - Low complexity → Agent execution
+  - Medium/High complexity → Codex execution
+
+#### Option A: Direct Execution with Agent
+
+**Operations**:
+- Launch @code-developer agent with full plan context
+- Agent receives exploration findings, clarifications, and task breakdown
+- **For subsequent executions**: Include previous execution results to maintain context continuity
+- Agent call format:
+  ```javascript
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="code-developer",
+    description="Implement planned tasks with progress tracking",
+    prompt=`
+    Implement the following tasks with TodoWrite progress updates:
+
+    Summary: ${planObject.summary}
+
+    Task Breakdown:
+    ${planObject.tasks.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t}`).join('\n')}
+
+    ${planObject.dependencies ? `\nTask Dependencies:\n${planObject.dependencies.join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+    ${previousExecutionResults ? `\n## Previous Execution Results\n${previousExecutionResults.map(result => `
+[${result.executionId}] ${result.status}
+Tasks handled: ${result.tasksSummary}
+Completion status: ${result.completionSummary}
+Key outputs: ${result.keyOutputs || 'See git diff for details'}
+${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
+    `).join('\n---\n')}` : ''}
+
+    Implementation Approach:
+    ${planObject.approach}
+
+    Code Context:
+    ${explorationContext || "No exploration performed"}
+
+    ${clarificationContext ? `\nClarifications:\n${clarificationContext}` : ''}
+
+    ${planObject.risks ? `\nRisks to Consider:\n${planObject.risks.join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+    IMPORTANT Instructions:
+    - **Context Continuity**: Review previous execution results above to understand what's already completed
+    - **Build on Previous Work**: Ensure your work integrates with previously completed tasks
+    - **Avoid Duplication**: Don't redo tasks that are already completed in previous executions
+    - **Parallel Execution**: Identify independent tasks from dependencies field and execute them in parallel using multiple tool calls in a single message
+    - **Dependency Respect**: Sequential tasks must wait for dependent tasks to complete before starting
+    - **Intelligent Grouping**: Analyze task dependencies to determine parallel groups - tasks with no file conflicts or logical dependencies can run simultaneously
+    - Test functionality as you go
+    - Handle risks proactively
+
+    Note: This agent call handles multiple tasks. TodoWrite tracking is managed at call level by orchestrator.
+    `
+  )
+  ```
+
+**Agent Responsibilities**:
+- Each agent call handles multiple tasks (grouped by dependencies)
+- Agent updates TodoWrite at **call level** (not individual task level)
+- Mark execution call as in_progress when starting, completed when all assigned tasks finished
+
+**Execution Result Collection** (for multi-execution scenarios):
+- After each execution completes, collect result summary:
+  ```javascript
+  executionResult = {
+    executionId: "[Agent-1]" or "[Codex-1]",
+    status: "completed" or "partial" or "failed",
+    tasksSummary: "Brief description of tasks handled",
+    completionSummary: "What was completed",
+    keyOutputs: "Files created/modified, key changes",
+    notes: "Any important context for next execution"
+  }
+  previousExecutionResults.push(executionResult)
+  ```
+- Pass `previousExecutionResults` to subsequent executions for context continuity
+
+#### Option B: CLI Execution (Codex)
+
+**Operations**:
+- Build codex CLI command with comprehensive context
+- **For subsequent executions**: Include previous execution results summary
+- Execute codex tool with write permissions
+- Monitor CLI output and update TodoWrite based on progress indicators
+- Parse CLI completion signals to mark tasks as done
+
+**Command Format (Codex)** - Single execution with full context:
+```bash
+codex --full-auto exec "
+TASK: ${planObject.summary}
+
+## Task Breakdown
+${planObject.tasks.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t}`).join('\n')}
+
+${planObject.dependencies ? `\n## Task Dependencies\n${planObject.dependencies.join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+${previousExecutionResults ? `\n## Previous Execution Results\n${previousExecutionResults.map(result => `
+[${result.executionId}] ${result.status}
+Tasks: ${result.tasksSummary}
+Status: ${result.completionSummary}
+Outputs: ${result.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
+${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
+`).join('\n---\n')}
+
+IMPORTANT: Review previous results above. Build on completed work. Avoid duplication.
+` : ''}
+
+## Implementation Approach
+${planObject.approach}
+
+## Code Context from Exploration
+${explorationContext ? `
+Project Structure: ${explorationContext.project_structure || 'Standard structure'}
+Relevant Files: ${explorationContext.relevant_files?.join(', ') || 'TBD'}
+Current Patterns: ${explorationContext.patterns || 'Follow existing conventions'}
+Integration Points: ${explorationContext.dependencies || 'None specified'}
+Constraints: ${explorationContext.constraints || 'None'}
+` : 'No prior exploration - analyze codebase as needed'}
+
+${clarificationContext ? `\n## User Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+${planObject.risks ? `\n## Risks to Handle\n${planObject.risks.join('\n')}` : ''}
+
+## Execution Instructions
+- Review previous execution results for context continuity
+- Build on previous work, don't duplicate completed tasks
+- Complete all assigned tasks in single execution
+- Test functionality as you implement
+- Handle identified risks proactively
+
+Complexity: ${planObject.complexity}
+" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+```
+
+**Note**: Avoid `resume --last` unless task is exceptionally complex or hits timeout. Optimize task breakdown for full completion in single execution.
+
+**Execution Result Collection** (for multi-execution scenarios):
+- After CLI execution completes, analyze output and collect result summary
+- Extract key information: modified files, completion status, important notes
+- Store in `previousExecutionResults` array for subsequent executions
+- Result structure same as Agent execution (see Option A above)
+
+**Execution with Progress Tracking**:
+```javascript
+// Launch CLI in foreground (NOT background)
+bash_result = Bash(
+  command=cli_command,
+  timeout=600000  // 10 minutes
+)
+
+// Update TodoWrite when CLI execution call completes
+// Mark execution call (e.g., "[Codex-1]") as completed when CLI finishes
+// One CLI call may handle multiple tasks - track at call level, not task level
+```
+
+**CLI Progress Monitoring**:
+- Monitor CLI execution at **call level** (not individual task level)
+- Update TodoWrite when CLI execution call completes (all assigned tasks done)
+- Provide real-time visibility of execution call progress to user
+
+**Step 5.3: Track Execution Progress**
+
+Track **agent/CLI call level** (not individual tasks):
+
+**Real-time TodoWrite Updates**:
+```javascript
+// When execution call starts
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "[Agent-1] (Implement auth service + Create JWT utilities)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing [Agent-1] (Implement auth service + Create JWT utilities)" },
+    { content: "[Agent-2] (Add middleware + Update routes)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing [Agent-2] (Add middleware + Update routes)" },
+    { content: "[Codex-1] (Add integration tests)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing [Codex-1] (Add integration tests)" }
+  ]
+})
+
+// When execution call completes
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "[Agent-1] (Implement auth service + Create JWT utilities)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Executing [Agent-1] (Implement auth service + Create JWT utilities)" },
+    { content: "[Agent-2] (Add middleware + Update routes)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing [Agent-2] (Add middleware + Update routes)" },
+    { content: "[Codex-1] (Add integration tests)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing [Codex-1] (Add integration tests)" }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+**User Visibility**:
+- User sees **execution call progress** (not individual task progress)
+- Current execution highlighted as "in_progress" (e.g., "[Agent-1] (Task A + Task B)")
+- Completed executions marked with checkmark
+- Pending executions remain unchecked
+- Each execution shows **task summary** for context
+
+**Progress Tracking**:
+- Track agent/CLI call completion (not task completion)
+- One execution call may handle multiple tasks simultaneously
+- Mark Phase 5 as completed when all execution calls done
+
+**Step 5.4: Code Review (Optional)**
+
+**Skip Condition**: Only run if user selected review tool in Phase 4 (not "Skip")
+
+**Operations**:
+- If "Agent Review": Current agent performs direct code review analysis
+- If "Gemini Review": Execute gemini CLI with code review analysis prompt
+- If "Other" (custom tool specified): Execute specified CLI tool (e.g., qwen, codex)
+- Review all modified files from execution
+- Generate quality assessment and improvement recommendations
+
+**Command Format**:
+```bash
+# Agent Review: Direct agent review (no CLI command needed)
+# Uses analysis prompt and TodoWrite tools directly
+
+# Gemini Review / Custom Tool (qwen, codex, etc.): Execute analysis command
+{selected_tool} -p "
+PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes
+TASK: • Analyze code quality • Identify potential issues • Suggest improvements
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: Review changes from lite-plan execution
+EXPECTED: Quality assessment with actionable recommendations
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on recent changes | analysis=READ-ONLY
+"
+```
+
+**Expected Duration**: Varies by task complexity and execution method
+- Low complexity: 5-15 minutes
+- Medium complexity: 15-45 minutes
+- High complexity: 45-120 minutes
+- Code review (if enabled): +2-5 minutes
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### Workflow Intelligence
+
+1. **Dynamic Adaptation**: Workflow automatically adjusts based on task characteristics
+   - Smart exploration: Only runs when task requires codebase context
+   - Adaptive planning: Simple tasks get direct planning, complex tasks use specialized agent
+   - Context-aware clarification: Only asks questions when truly needed
+   - Reduces unnecessary steps while maintaining thoroughness
+   - **Flag-Based Control**:
+     - Use `-e` or `--explore` to force exploration when:
+       - Task appears simple but you know it requires codebase context
+       - Auto-detection might miss subtle integration points
+       - You want comprehensive code understanding before planning
+
+2. **Progressive Clarification**: Gather information at the right time
+   - Phase 1: Explore codebase to understand current state
+   - Phase 2: Ask clarifying questions based on exploration findings
+   - Phase 3: Plan with complete context (task + exploration + clarifications)
+   - Avoids premature assumptions and reduces rework
+
+3. **Complexity-Aware Planning**: Planning strategy matches task complexity
+   - Low complexity (1-2 files): Direct planning by current Claude (fast, 20-30s)
+   - Medium complexity (3-5 files): CLI planning agent (detailed, 40-50s)
+   - High complexity (6+ files): CLI planning agent with risk analysis (thorough, 50-60s)
+   - Balances speed and thoroughness appropriately
+
+4. **Two-Step Confirmation Process**: Clear plan presentation followed by comprehensive control
+   - **Step 1**: Display complete plan as readable text output (not embedded in question)
+     - Shows summary, approach, tasks, dependencies, risks, complexity, time estimate
+     - Clear separation between plan content and user interaction
+   - **Step 2**: Collect three-dimensional input via AskUserQuestion
+     - First dimension: Confirm/Modify/Cancel plan (multi-select with supplement via "Other")
+     - Second dimension: Execution method selection (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+     - Third dimension: Code review tool selection (Skip/Gemini/Agent, custom via "Other")
+   - Allows plan refinement without re-selecting execution method
+   - Supports iterative planning with user feedback
+   - Auto mode intelligently selects execution method based on complexity
+   - Custom code review tools (qwen, codex, etc.) can be specified via "Other" option
+
+### Task Management
+
+1. **Live Progress Tracking**: TodoWrite provides real-time execution call visibility
+   - Execution calls ([Agent-1], [Codex-1], etc.) created before execution starts
+   - Updated in real-time as execution calls progress
+   - User sees current execution call being worked on (e.g., "[Agent-1] (Task A + Task B)")
+   - Each execution call shows task summary for context
+   - Clear completion status at call level (not individual task level)
+
+2. **Phase-Based Organization**: 5 distinct phases with clear transitions
+   - Phase 1: Task Analysis & Exploration (automatic)
+   - Phase 2: Clarification (conditional, interactive)
+   - Phase 3: Planning (automatic, adaptive)
+   - Phase 4: Confirmation (interactive, two-dimensional)
+   - Phase 5: Execution & Tracking (automatic with live updates)
+
+3. **Flexible Task Counts**: Task breakdown adapts to complexity
+   - Low complexity: 3-5 tasks (focused)
+   - Medium complexity: 5-7 tasks (detailed)
+   - High complexity: 7-10 tasks (comprehensive)
+   - Avoids artificial constraints while maintaining focus
+
+4. **Dependency Tracking**: Medium/High complexity tasks include dependencies
+   - Explicit task ordering when sequence matters
+   - Parallel execution hints when tasks are independent
+   - Risk flagging for complex interactions
+   - Helps agent/CLI execute correctly
+
+### Planning Standards
+
+1. **Context-Rich Planning**: Plans include all relevant context
+   - Exploration findings (code structure, patterns, constraints)
+   - User clarifications (requirements, preferences, decisions)
+   - Complexity assessment (risks, dependencies, time estimates)
+   - Execution recommendations (Direct vs CLI, specific tool)
+
+2. **Modification Support**: Plans can be iteratively refined
+   - User can request plan modifications in Phase 4
+   - Feedback incorporated into re-planning
+   - No need to restart from scratch
+   - Supports collaborative planning workflow
+
+3. **No File Artifacts**: All planning stays in memory
+   - Faster workflow without I/O overhead
+   - Cleaner workspace
+   - Plan context passed directly to execution
+   - Reduces complexity and maintenance
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Common Errors
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Phase 1 Exploration Failure | cli-explore-agent unavailable or timeout | Skip exploration, set `explorationContext = null`, log warning, continue to Phase 2/3 with task description only |
+| Phase 2 Clarification Timeout | User no response > 5 minutes | Use exploration findings as-is without clarification, proceed to Phase 3 with warning |
+| Phase 3 Planning Agent Failure | cli-planning-agent unavailable or timeout | Fallback to direct planning by current Claude (simplified plan), continue to Phase 4 |
+| Phase 3 Planning Timeout | Planning takes > 90 seconds | Generate simplified direct plan, mark as "Quick Plan", continue to Phase 4 with reduced detail |
+| Phase 4 Confirmation Timeout | User no response > 5 minutes | Save plan context to temporary var, display resume instructions, exit gracefully |
+| Phase 4 Modification Loop | User requests modify > 3 times | Suggest breaking task into smaller pieces or using /workflow:plan for comprehensive planning |
+| Phase 5 Codex Unavailable | Codex tool not installed | Show installation instructions, offer to re-select (Agent execution or Auto mode) |
+| Phase 5 Execution Failure | Agent/Codex crashes or errors | Display error details, save partial progress from TodoWrite, suggest manual recovery or retry |
+
+## Input/Output
+
+### Input Requirements
+- Task description: String or path to .md file (required)
+  - Should be specific and concrete
+  - Can include context about existing code or requirements
+  - Examples:
+    - "Implement user authentication with JWT tokens"
+    - "Refactor logging module for better performance"
+    - "Add unit tests for authentication service"
+- Flags (optional):
+  - `-e` or `--explore`: Force code exploration phase (overrides auto-detection)
+
+### Output Format
+
+**In-Memory Plan Object**:
+```javascript
+{
+  summary: "2-3 sentence overview of implementation",
+  approach: "High-level implementation strategy",
+  tasks: [
+    "Task 1: Specific action with file locations",
+    "Task 2: Specific action with file locations",
+    // ... 3-7 tasks total
+  ],
+  complexity: "Low|Medium|High",
+  recommended_execution: "Agent|Codex",  // Based on complexity
+  estimated_time: "X minutes"
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Result**:
+- Immediate dispatch to selected tool/agent with plan context
+- No file artifacts generated during planning phase
+- Execution starts immediately after user confirmation
+- Tool/agent handles implementation and any necessary file operations
+

.claude/commands/workflow/plan.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: plan
-description: Orchestrate 4-phase planning workflow by executing commands and passing context between phases
-argument-hint: "[--agent] [--cli-execute] \"text description\"|file.md"
+description: 5-phase planning workflow with action-planning-agent task generation, outputs IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs with optional CLI auto-execution
+argument-hint: "[--cli-execute] \"text description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -9,38 +9,44 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 4 slash commands in sequence, parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution through **automatic continuation**.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 5 slash commands in sequence (including a quality gate), parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution through **automatic continuation**.
 
-**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow**:
+**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow with Quality Gate**:
+
+This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 3 (conflict resolution) and Phase 4 (task generation) are delegated to specialized agents.
 
-This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes, reports its output to you, then **immediately and automatically** proceeds to the next phase without requiring any user intervention.
 
 1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:plan "task"`
-2. **Phase 1 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
-3. **Phase 2 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
-4. **Phase 3 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
-5. **Phase 4 executes** → Reports final summary
+2. **Phase 1 executes** → Session discovery → Auto-continues
+3. **Phase 2 executes** → Context gathering → Auto-continues
+4. **Phase 3 executes** (optional, if conflict_risk ≥ medium) → Conflict resolution → Auto-continues
+5. **Phase 4 executes** → Task generation (task-generate-agent) → Reports final summary
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
 
 **Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
-- TodoList tracks current phase status
-- After each phase completion, automatically executes next pending phase
-- **No user action required** - workflow runs end-to-end autonomously
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction (clarification handled in brainstorm phase)
 - Progress updates shown at each phase for visibility
-
-**Execution Modes**:
-- **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate`
-- **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent`
-- **CLI Execute Mode** (`--cli-execute`): Generate tasks with Codex execution commands
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
 
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files, analyze structure, or gather context before Phase 1
-3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command's output for next phase
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command/agent output for next phase
 4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
-5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
-## 4-Phase Execution
+## 5-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
 **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
@@ -81,62 +87,148 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **Parse Output**:
 - Extract: context-package.json path (store as `contextPath`)
-- Typical pattern: `.workflow/[sessionId]/.context/context-package.json`
+- Typical pattern: `.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/context-package.json`
 
 **Validation**:
 - Context package path extracted
 - File exists and is valid JSON
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When context-gather invoked, INSERT 3 context-gather tasks, mark first as in_progress -->
 
-**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Analyze codebase structure (context-gather)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing codebase structure"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Identify integration points (context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying integration points"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.3: Generate context package (context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context package"},
+  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 2 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 2.1-2.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3/4 (depending on conflict_risk)
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 3: Intelligent Analysis
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+### Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (Optional - auto-triggered by conflict risk)
 
-**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1, `contextPath` from Phase 2
+**Trigger**: Only execute when context-package.json indicates conflict_risk is "medium" or "high"
+
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+
+**Input**:
+- sessionId from Phase 1
+- contextPath from Phase 2
+- conflict_risk from context-package.json
 
 **Parse Output**:
-- Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md created
+- Extract: Execution status (success/skipped/failed)
+- Verify: CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file path (if executed)
 
 **Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[sessionId]/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` exists
-- Contains task recommendations section
+- File `.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md` exists (if executed)
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+**Skip Behavior**:
+- If conflict_risk is "none" or "low", skip directly to Phase 3.5
+- Display: "No significant conflicts detected, proceeding to clarification"
 
-**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing Phase 3 results, then auto-continue to Phase 4
+<!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Detect conflicts with CLI analysis (conflict-resolution)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Present conflicts to user (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Apply resolution strategies (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
+  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Resolve conflicts and apply fixes", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing conflict resolution results (if executed) and selected strategies, then auto-continue to Phase 3.5
+
+**Memory State Check**:
+- Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
+- If memory usage is high (>110K tokens or approaching context limits):
+  - **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/compact")`
+  - This optimizes memory before proceeding to Phase 3.5
+- Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
+- Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3.5: Pre-Task Generation Validation (Optional Quality Gate)
+
+**Purpose**: Optional quality gate before task generation - primarily handled by brainstorm synthesis phase
+
+
+**Current Behavior**: Auto-skip to Phase 4 (Task Generation)
+
+**Future Enhancement**: Could add additional validation steps like:
+- Cross-reference checks between conflict resolution and brainstorm analyses
+- Final sanity checks before task generation
+- User confirmation prompt for proceeding
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3.5 completed (auto-skip), phase 4 in_progress
+
+**After Phase 3.5**: Auto-continue to Phase 4 immediately
 
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Task Generation
 
 **Relationship with Brainstorm Phase**:
-- If brainstorm synthesis exists (synthesis-specification.md), Phase 3 analysis incorporates it as input
-- **synthesis-specification.md defines "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, high-level features
+- If brainstorm role analyses exist ([role]/analysis.md files), Phase 3 analysis incorporates them as input
+- **User's original intent is ALWAYS primary**: New or refined user goals override brainstorm recommendations
+- **Role analysis.md files define "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, role-specific insights
 - **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
-- Task generation translates high-level specifications into concrete, actionable work items
+- Task generation translates high-level role analyses into concrete, actionable work items
+- **Intent priority**: Current user prompt > role analysis.md files > guidance-specification.md
 
-**Command Selection**:
-- Manual: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate --session [sessionId]")`
-- Agent: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")`
-- CLI Execute: Add `--cli-execute` flag to either command
-
-**Flag Combination**:
-- `--cli-execute` alone: Manual task generation with CLI execution
-- `--agent --cli-execute`: Agent task generation with CLI execution
-
-**Command Examples**:
+**Command**:
 ```bash
-# Manual with CLI execution
-/workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
+# Default (agent mode)
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")
 
-# Agent with CLI execution
-/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
+# With CLI execution
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId] --cli-execute")
 ```
 
+**Flag**:
+- `--cli-execute`: Generate tasks with Codex execution commands
+
 **Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
 
 **Validation**:
@@ -144,7 +236,31 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 - `.workflow/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
 - `.workflow/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-agent invoked, ATTACH 1 agent task -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand invoked - agent task attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute task-generate-agent", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing task-generate-agent"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Single agent task attached. Agent autonomously completes discovery, planning, and output generation internally.
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After agent completes, mark task as completed -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute task-generate-agent", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing task-generate-agent"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Agent task completed. No collapse needed (single task).
 
 **Return to User**:
 ```
@@ -152,35 +268,51 @@ Planning complete for session: [sessionId]
 Tasks generated: [count]
 Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
 
-✅ Recommended Next Steps:
+Recommended Next Steps:
 1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify plan quality before execution
 2. /workflow:status  # Review task breakdown
 3. /workflow:execute  # Start implementation (after verification)
 
-⚠️ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues early
+Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues early
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-```javascript
-// Initialize (before Phase 1)
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute intelligent analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing intelligent analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
-]})
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for real-time visibility into workflow execution.
 
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute intelligent analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing intelligent analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
-]})
+### Key Principles
 
-// Continue pattern for Phase 2, 3, 4...
-```
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks attached (e.g., Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
+   - **Phase 4**: Single agent task attached (e.g., "Execute task-generate-agent")
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - **Applies to Phase 2, 3**: Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 2.1-2.3 collapse to "Execute context gathering: completed"
+   - **Phase 4**: No collapse needed (single task, just mark completed)
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After completion, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary for Phase 2/3, or marked completed for Phase 4) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+### Benefits
+
+- ✓ Real-time visibility into sub-task execution
+- ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach → execute → collapse (Phase 2/3) or complete (Phase 4)
+- ✓ Clean summary after completion
+- ✓ Easy to track workflow progress
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions for detailed TodoWrite Update examples:
+- **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks with attach/collapse pattern
+- **Phase 4**: Single agent task (no collapse needed)
 
 ## Input Processing
 
@@ -228,14 +360,22 @@ Phase 1: session:start --auto "structured-description"
     ↓
 Phase 2: context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
     ↓ Input: sessionId + session memory + structured description
-    ↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json)
+    ↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json) + conflict_risk
     ↓
-Phase 3: concept-enhanced --session sessionId --context contextPath
-    ↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + session memory
-    ↓ Output: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+Phase 3: conflict-resolution [AUTO-TRIGGERED if conflict_risk ≥ medium]
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + conflict_risk
+    ↓ CLI-powered conflict detection (JSON output)
+    ↓ AskUserQuestion: Present conflicts + resolution strategies
+    ↓ User selects strategies (or skip)
+    ↓ Apply modifications via Edit tool:
+    ↓   - Update guidance-specification.md
+    ↓   - Update role analyses (*.md)
+    ↓   - Mark context-package.json as "resolved"
+    ↓ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts (NO report file)
+    ↓ Skip if conflict_risk is none/low → proceed directly to Phase 4
     ↓
-Phase 4: task-generate[--agent] --session sessionId
-    ↓ Input: sessionId + ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md + session memory
+Phase 4: task-generate-agent --session sessionId [--cli-execute]
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + resolved brainstorm artifacts + session memory
     ↓ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
     ↓
 Return summary to user
@@ -244,7 +384,7 @@ Return summary to user
 **Session Memory Flow**: Each phase receives session ID, which provides access to:
 - Previous task summaries
 - Existing context and analysis
-- Brainstorming artifacts
+- Brainstorming artifacts (potentially modified by Phase 3)
 - Session-specific configuration
 
 **Structured Description Benefits**:
@@ -253,6 +393,56 @@ Return summary to user
 - **Traceability**: Easy to track what was requested
 - **Precision**: Better context gathering and analysis
 
+## Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+User triggers: /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite Init] 3 orchestrator-level tasks
+  ↓
+Phase 1: Session Discovery
+  → sessionId extracted
+  ↓
+Phase 2: Context Gathering (SlashCommand invoked)
+  → ATTACH 3 tasks: ← ATTACHED
+    - Phase 2.1: Analyze codebase structure
+    - Phase 2.2: Identify integration points
+    - Phase 2.3: Generate context package
+  → Execute Phase 2.1-2.3
+  → COLLAPSE tasks ← COLLAPSED
+  → contextPath + conflict_risk extracted
+  ↓
+Conditional Branch: Check conflict_risk
+  ├─ IF conflict_risk ≥ medium:
+  │   Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (SlashCommand invoked)
+  │     → ATTACH 3 tasks: ← ATTACHED
+  │       - Phase 3.1: Detect conflicts with CLI analysis
+  │       - Phase 3.2: Present conflicts to user
+  │       - Phase 3.3: Apply resolution strategies
+  │     → Execute Phase 3.1-3.3
+  │     → COLLAPSE tasks ← COLLAPSED
+  │
+  └─ ELSE: Skip Phase 3, proceed to Phase 4
+  ↓
+Phase 4: Task Generation (SlashCommand invoked)
+  → ATTACH 1 agent task: ← ATTACHED
+    - Execute task-generate-agent
+  → Agent autonomously completes internally:
+    (discovery → planning → output)
+  → Outputs: IMPL_PLAN.md, IMPL-*.json, TODO_LIST.md
+  ↓
+Return summary to user
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+- **← ATTACHED**: Tasks attached to TodoWrite when SlashCommand invoked
+  - Phase 2, 3: Multiple sub-tasks
+  - Phase 4: Single agent task
+- **← COLLAPSED**: Sub-tasks collapsed to summary after completion (Phase 2, 3 only)
+- **Phase 4**: Single agent task, no collapse (just mark completed)
+- **Conditional Branch**: Phase 3 only executes if conflict_risk ≥ medium
+- **Continuous Flow**: No user intervention between phases
+
 ## Error Handling
 
 - **Parsing Failure**: If output parsing fails, retry command once, then report error
@@ -261,22 +451,23 @@ Return summary to user
 
 ## Coordinator Checklist
 
-✅ **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
-✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command
-✅ Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
-✅ Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
-✅ Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
-✅ Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
-✅ Pass session ID and context path to Phase 3 command
-✅ Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md after Phase 3
-✅ **Build Phase 4 command** based on flags:
-  - Base command: `/workflow:tools:task-generate` (or `-agent` if `--agent` flag)
-  - Add `--session [sessionId]`
+- **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
+- Initialize TodoWrite before any command (Phase 3 added dynamically after Phase 2)
+- Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
+- Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
+- Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
+- Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
+- **Extract conflict_risk from context-package.json**: Determine Phase 3 execution
+- **If conflict_risk ≥ medium**: Launch Phase 3 conflict-resolution with sessionId and contextPath
+- Wait for Phase 3 to finish executing (if executed), verify CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md created
+- **If conflict_risk is none/low**: Skip Phase 3, proceed directly to Phase 4
+- **Build Phase 4 command**:
+  - Base command: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]`
   - Add `--cli-execute` if flag present
-✅ Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
-✅ Verify all Phase 4 outputs
-✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
-✅ After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
+- Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
+- Verify all Phase 4 outputs
+- Update TodoWrite after each phase (dynamically adjust for Phase 3 presence)
+- After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
 
 ## Structure Template Reference
 
@@ -304,3 +495,21 @@ CONSTRAINTS: [Limitations or boundaries]
 # Phase 2
 /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-123 "GOAL: Build authentication\nSCOPE: JWT, login, registration\nCONTEXT: REST API"
 ```
+
+## Related Commands
+
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` - Optional: Generate role-based analyses before planning (if complex requirements need multiple perspectives)
+- `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` - Optional: Refine brainstorm analyses with clarifications
+
+**Called by This Command** (5 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create or discover workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2: Gather project context and analyze codebase
+- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 3: Detect and resolve conflicts (auto-triggered if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
+- `/compact` - Phase 3: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent` - Phase 4: Generate task JSON files with agent-driven approach
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:action-plan-verify` - Recommended: Verify plan quality and catch issues before execution
+- `/workflow:status` - Review task breakdown and current progress
+- `/workflow:execute` - Begin implementation of generated tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/review.md

@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
 ---
 name: review
-description: Optional specialized review (security, architecture, docs) for completed implementation
+description: Post-implementation review with specialized types (security/architecture/action-items/quality) using analysis agents and Gemini
 argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [optional: session-id]"
 ---
 
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/workflow:review`
+## Command Overview: /workflow:review
 
 **Optional specialized review** for completed implementations. In the standard workflow, **passing tests = approved code**. Use this command only when specialized review is required (security, architecture, compliance, docs).
 
 ## Philosophy: "Tests Are the Review"
 
-- ✅ **Default**: All tests pass → Code approved
-- 🔍 **Optional**: Specialized reviews for:
-  - 🔒 Security audits (vulnerabilities, auth/authz)
-  - 🏗️ Architecture compliance (patterns, technical debt)
-  - 📋 Action items verification (requirements met, acceptance criteria)
+- **Default**: All tests pass -> Code approved
+- **Optional**: Specialized reviews for:
+  - Security audits (vulnerabilities, auth/authz)
+  - Architecture compliance (patterns, technical debt)
+  - Action items verification (requirements met, acceptance criteria)
 
 ## Review Types
 
@@ -44,13 +44,13 @@ fi
 
 # Step 2: Validation
 if [ ! -d ".workflow/${sessionId}" ]; then
-    echo "❌ Session ${sessionId} not found"
+    echo "Session ${sessionId} not found"
     exit 1
 fi
 
 # Check for completed tasks
 if [ ! -d ".workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
-    echo "❌ No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first"
+    echo "No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first"
     exit 1
 fi
 
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ review_type="${TYPE_ARG:-quality}"
 
 # Redirect docs review to specialized command
 if [ "$review_type" = "docs" ]; then
-    echo "💡 For documentation generation, please use:"
+    echo "For documentation generation, please use:"
     echo "   /workflow:tools:docs"
     echo ""
     echo "The docs command provides:"
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ fi
 # BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
 ```
 
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
+### Model Analysis Phase
 
 After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 
@@ -92,17 +92,17 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 2. **Perform Specialized Review**: Based on `review_type`
 
    **Security Review** (`--type=security`):
-   - Use MCP code search for security patterns:
+   - Use ripgrep for security patterns:
      ```bash
-     mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="password|token|secret|auth", file_pattern="*.{ts,js,py}")
-     mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="eval|exec|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML", file_pattern="*.{ts,js,tsx}")
+     rg "password|token|secret|auth" -g "*.{ts,js,py}"
+     rg "eval|exec|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML" -g "*.{ts,js,tsx}"
      ```
    - Use Gemini for security analysis:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && gemini -p "
      PURPOSE: Security audit of completed implementation
      TASK: Review code for security vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, auth/authz issues
-     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED: Security findings report with severity levels
      RULES: Focus on OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data validation, injection risks
      " --approval-mode yolo
@@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
    **Architecture Review** (`--type=architecture`):
    - Use Qwen for architecture analysis:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && qwen -p "
      PURPOSE: Architecture compliance review
      TASK: Evaluate adherence to architectural patterns, identify technical debt, review design decisions
-     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED: Architecture assessment with recommendations
      RULES: Check for patterns, separation of concerns, modularity, scalability
      " --approval-mode yolo
@@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
    **Quality Review** (`--type=quality`):
    - Use Gemini for code quality:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && gemini -p "
      PURPOSE: Code quality and best practices review
      TASK: Assess code readability, maintainability, adherence to best practices
-     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED: Quality assessment with improvement suggestions
      RULES: Check for code smells, duplication, complexity, naming conventions
      " --approval-mode yolo
@@ -143,10 +143,10 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
      ' {} \;
 
      # Check implementation summaries against requirements
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && gemini -p "
      PURPOSE: Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria are met
      TASK: Cross-check implementation summaries against original requirements
-     CONTEXT: @{.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED:
      - Requirements coverage matrix
      - Acceptance criteria verification
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
    ```bash
    # If architecture or quality issues found, suggest memory update
    if [ "$review_type" = "architecture" ] || [ "$review_type" = "quality" ]; then
-       echo "💡 Consider updating project documentation:"
+       echo "Consider updating project documentation:"
        echo "   /update-memory-related"
    fi
    ```
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 /workflow:review --type=docs
 ```
 
-## ✨ Features
+## Features
 
 - **Simple Validation**: Check session exists and has completed tasks
 - **No Complex Orchestration**: Direct analysis, no multi-phase pipeline
@@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 
 ```
 Standard Workflow:
-  plan → execute → test-gen → execute ✅
+  plan -> execute -> test-gen -> execute (complete)
 
 Optional Review (when needed):
-  plan → execute → test-gen → execute → review (security/architecture/docs)
+  plan -> execute -> test-gen -> execute -> review (security/architecture/docs)
 ```
 
 **When to Use**:
@@ -256,11 +256,3 @@ Optional Review (when needed):
 - Regular development (tests are sufficient)
 - Simple bug fixes (test-fix-agent handles it)
 - Minor changes (update-memory-related is enough)
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/workflow:execute` - Must complete implementation first
-- `/workflow:test-gen` - Primary quality gate (tests)
-- `/workflow:tools:docs` - Generate hierarchical documentation (use instead of `--type=docs`)
-- `/update-memory-related` - Update CLAUDE.md docs after architecture findings
-- `/workflow:status` - Check session status

.claude/commands/workflow/session/complete.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: complete
-description: Mark the active workflow session as complete and remove active flag
+description: Mark active workflow session as complete, archive with lessons learned, update manifest, remove active flag
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:complete
   - /workflow:session:complete --detailed
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ examples:
 # Complete Workflow Session (/workflow:session:complete)
 
 ## Overview
-Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, update its status, and remove the active flag marker.
+Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, analyze it for lessons learned, move it to the archive directory, and remove the active flag marker.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
@@ -19,87 +19,129 @@ Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, update its status, and r
 
 ## Implementation Flow
 
-### Step 1: Find Active Session
+### Phase 1: Prepare for Archival (Minimal Manual Operations)
+
+**Purpose**: Find active session, move to archive location, pass control to agent. Minimal operations.
+
+#### Step 1.1: Find Active Session and Get Name
 ```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
-```
+# Find active marker
+bash(find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f | head -1)
 
-### Step 2: Get Session Name
+# Extract session name from marker path
+bash(basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+```
+**Output**: Session name `WFS-session-name`
+
+#### Step 1.2: Move Session to Archive
 ```bash
-basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//'
+# Create archive directory if needed
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/.archives/)
+
+# Move session to archive location
+bash(mv .workflow/WFS-session-name .workflow/.archives/WFS-session-name)
+```
+**Result**: Session now at `.workflow/.archives/WFS-session-name/`
+
+### Phase 2: Agent-Orchestrated Completion (All Data Processing)
+
+**Purpose**: Agent analyzes archived session, generates metadata, updates manifest, and removes active marker.
+
+#### Agent Invocation
+
+Invoke `universal-executor` agent to complete the archival process.
+
+**Agent Task**:
+```
+Task(
+  subagent_type="universal-executor",
+  description="Complete session archival",
+  prompt=`
+Complete workflow session archival. Session already moved to archive location.
+
+## Context
+- Session: .workflow/.archives/WFS-session-name/
+- Active marker: .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
+
+## Tasks
+
+1. **Extract session data** from workflow-session.json (session_id, description/topic, started_at/timestamp, completed_at, status)
+   - If status != "completed", update it with timestamp
+
+2. **Count files**: tasks (.task/*.json) and summaries (.summaries/*.md)
+
+3. **Generate lessons**: Use gemini with ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/archive/analysis-simple.txt (fallback: analyze files directly)
+   - Return: {successes, challenges, watch_patterns}
+
+4. **Build archive entry**:
+   - Calculate: duration_hours, success_rate, tags (3-5 keywords)
+   - Construct complete JSON with session_id, description, archived_at, archive_path, metrics, tags, lessons
+
+5. **Update manifest**: Initialize .workflow/.archives/manifest.json if needed, append entry
+
+6. **Remove active marker**
+
+7. **Return result**: {"status": "success", "session_id": "...", "archived_at": "...", "metrics": {...}, "lessons_summary": {...}}
+
+## Error Handling
+- On failure: return {"status": "error", "task": "...", "message": "..."}
+- Do NOT remove marker if failed
+  `
+)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Update Session Status
+**Expected Output**:
+- Agent returns JSON result confirming successful archival
+- Display completion summary to user based on agent response
+
+## Workflow Execution Strategy
+
+### Two-Phase Approach (Optimized)
+
+**Phase 1: Minimal Manual Setup** (2 simple operations)
+- Find active session and extract name
+- Move session to archive location
+- **No data extraction** - agent handles all data processing
+- **No counting** - agent does this from archive location
+- **Total**: 2 bash commands (find + move)
+
+**Phase 2: Agent-Driven Completion** (1 agent invocation)
+- Extract all session data from archived location
+- Count tasks and summaries
+- Generate lessons learned analysis
+- Build complete archive metadata
+- Update manifest
+- Remove active marker
+- Return success/error result
+
+## Quick Commands
+
 ```bash
-jq '.status = "completed"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+# Phase 1: Find and move
+bash(find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f | head -1)
+bash(basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/.archives/)
+bash(mv .workflow/WFS-session-name .workflow/.archives/WFS-session-name)
+
+# Phase 2: Agent completes archival
+Task(subagent_type="universal-executor", description="Complete session archival", prompt=`...`)
 ```
 
-### Step 4: Add Completion Timestamp
+## Archive Query Commands
+
+After archival, you can query the manifest:
+
 ```bash
-jq '.completed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+# List all archived sessions
+jq '.archives[].session_id' .workflow/.archives/manifest.json
+
+# Find sessions by keyword
+jq '.archives[] | select(.description | test("auth"; "i"))' .workflow/.archives/manifest.json
+
+# Get specific session details
+jq '.archives[] | select(.session_id == "WFS-user-auth")' .workflow/.archives/manifest.json
+
+# List all watch patterns across sessions
+jq '.archives[].lessons.watch_patterns[]' .workflow/.archives/manifest.json
 ```
 
-### Step 5: Count Final Statistics
-```bash
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-```
-
-### Step 6: Remove Active Marker
-```bash
-rm .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Find active session**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
-- **Get session name**: `basename marker | sed 's/^\.active-//'`
-- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "completed"' session.json > temp.json`
-- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.completed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
-- **Count tasks**: `find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l`
-- **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l`
-- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-session`
-
-### Completion Result
-```
-Session WFS-user-auth completed
-- Status: completed
-- Started: 2025-09-15T10:00:00Z
-- Completed: 2025-09-15T16:30:00Z
-- Duration: 6h 30m
-- Total tasks: 8
-- Completed tasks: 8
-- Success rate: 100%
-```
-
-### Detailed Summary (--detailed flag)
-```
-Session Completion Summary:
-├── Session: WFS-user-auth
-├── Project: User authentication system
-├── Total time: 6h 30m
-├── Tasks completed: 8/8 (100%)
-├── Files generated: 24 files
-├── Summaries created: 8 summaries
-├── Status: All tasks completed successfully
-└── Location: .workflow/WFS-user-auth/
-```
-
-### Error Handling
-```bash
-# No active session
-find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f 2>/dev/null || echo "No active session found"
-
-# Incomplete tasks
-task_count=$(find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l)
-summary_count=$(find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-test $task_count -eq $summary_count || echo "Warning: Not all tasks completed"
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:list` - View all sessions including completed
-- `/workflow:session:start` - Start new session
-- `/workflow:status` - Check completion status before completing

.claude/commands/workflow/session/list.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: list
-description: List all workflow sessions with status
+description: List all workflow sessions with status filtering, shows session metadata and progress information
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:list
 ---
@@ -59,19 +59,19 @@ jq -r '.created_at // "unknown"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 Workflow Sessions:
 
-✅ WFS-oauth-integration (ACTIVE)
+[ACTIVE] WFS-oauth-integration
    Project: OAuth2 authentication system
    Status: active
    Progress: 3/8 tasks completed
    Created: 2025-09-15T10:30:00Z
 
-⏸️ WFS-user-profile (PAUSED)
+[PAUSED] WFS-user-profile
    Project: User profile management
    Status: paused
    Progress: 1/5 tasks completed
    Created: 2025-09-14T14:15:00Z
 
-📁 WFS-database-migration (COMPLETED)
+[COMPLETED] WFS-database-migration
    Project: Database schema migration
    Status: completed
    Progress: 4/4 tasks completed
@@ -81,10 +81,10 @@ Total: 3 sessions (1 active, 1 paused, 1 completed)
 ```
 
 ### Status Indicators
-- **✅**: Active session
-- **⏸️**: Paused session
-- **📁**: Completed session
-- **❌**: Error/corrupted session
+- **[ACTIVE]**: Active session
+- **[PAUSED]**: Paused session
+- **[COMPLETED]**: Completed session
+- **[ERROR]**: Error/corrupted session
 
 ### Quick Commands
 ```bash
@@ -96,9 +96,4 @@ ls .workflow/.active-* | basename | sed 's/^\.active-//'
 
 # Show recent sessions
 ls -t .workflow/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -3
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:start` - Create new session
-- `/workflow:session:switch` - Switch to different session
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Detailed session info
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/session/resume.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: resume
-description: Resume the most recently paused workflow session
+description: Resume the most recently paused workflow session with automatic session discovery and status update
 ---
 
 # Resume Workflow Session (/workflow:session:resume)
@@ -64,9 +64,4 @@ Session WFS-user-auth resumed
 - Paused at: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
 - Resumed at: 2025-09-15T15:45:00Z
 - Ready for: /workflow:execute
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:pause` - Pause current session
-- `/workflow:execute` - Continue workflow execution
-- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all sessions
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/session/start.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: start
-description: Discover existing sessions or start a new workflow session with intelligent session management
+description: Discover existing sessions or start new workflow session with intelligent session management and conflict detection
 argument-hint: [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:start
@@ -212,9 +212,4 @@ bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-test","project":"test project","status":"planning"
 - Pattern: `WFS-[lowercase-slug]`
 - Characters: `a-z`, `0-9`, `-` only
 - Max length: 50 characters
-- Uniqueness: Add numeric suffix if collision (`WFS-auth-2`, `WFS-auth-3`)
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Uses `--auto` mode for session management
-- `/workflow:execute` - Uses discovery mode for session selection
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Shows detailed session information
+- Uniqueness: Add numeric suffix if collision (`WFS-auth-2`, `WFS-auth-3`)

.claude/commands/workflow/status.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: workflow:status
-description: Generate on-demand views from JSON task data
+description: Generate on-demand task status views from JSON task data with optional task-id filtering for detailed view
 argument-hint: "[optional: task-id]"
 ---
 
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@ find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
 **Progress**: 3/8 tasks completed
 
 ## Active Tasks
-- [⚠️] impl-1: Current task in progress
+- [IN PROGRESS] impl-1: Current task in progress
 - [ ] impl-2: Next pending task
 
 ## Completed Tasks
-- [✅] impl-0: Setup completed
+- [COMPLETED] impl-0: Setup completed
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands
@@ -112,13 +112,8 @@ Summary: .summaries/impl-1-summary.md
 
 ### Validation Results
 ```
-✅ Session file valid
-✅ 8 task files found
-✅ 3 summaries found
-⚠️ 5 tasks pending completion
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:execute` - Uses this for task discovery
-- `/workflow:resume` - Uses this for progress analysis
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Shows session metadata
+Session file valid
+8 task files found
+3 summaries found
+5 tasks pending completion
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-plan.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-plan
-description: Orchestrate TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chains
-argument-hint: "[--agent] \"feature description\"|file.md"
+description: TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chain generation, test-first development structure, and cycle tracking
+argument-hint: "[--cli-execute] \"feature description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -9,23 +9,37 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 5 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 6 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation with Red-Green-Refactor task generation.
 
 **Execution Modes**:
-- **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd`
-- **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --agent`
+- **Agent Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` (autonomous agent-driven)
+- **CLI Mode** (`--cli-execute`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --cli-execute` (Gemini/Qwen)
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
 
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data for next phase
-4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous output
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 7 completes (with concept verification)
+4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 6. **TDD Context**: All descriptions include "TDD:" prefix
-7. **Quality Gate**: Phase 5 concept verification ensures clarity before task generation
+7. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+8. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
-## 7-Phase Execution (with Concept Verification)
+## 6-Phase Execution (with Conflict Resolution)
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
 **Command**: `/workflow:session:start --auto "TDD: [structured-description]"`
@@ -41,10 +55,32 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 
 **Parse**: Extract sessionId
 
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+**After Phase 1**: Return to user showing Phase 1 results, then auto-continue to Phase 2
+
+---
+
 ### Phase 2: Context Gathering
 **Command**: `/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] "TDD: [structured-description]"`
 
-**Parse**: Extract contextPath
+**Use Same Structured Description**: Pass the same structured format from Phase 1
+
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: context-package.json path (store as `contextPath`)
+- Typical pattern: `.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/context-package.json`
+
+**Validation**:
+- Context package path extracted
+- File exists and is valid JSON
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3
+
+---
 
 ### Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis
 **Command**: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]`
@@ -63,96 +99,307 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 - Prevents duplicate test creation
 - Enables integration with existing tests
 
-### Phase 4: TDD Analysis
-**Command**: `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]`
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather invoked, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
 
-**Note**: Generates ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with TDD-specific structure:
-- Feature list with testable requirements
-- Test cases for Red phase
-- Implementation requirements for Green phase
-- Refactoring opportunities
-- Task dependencies and execution order
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Detect test framework and conventions (test-context-gather)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting test framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Analyze existing test coverage (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test coverage"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Identify coverage gaps (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
 
-**Parse**: Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md contains TDD breakdown sections
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
-### Phase 5: Concept Verification (NEW QUALITY GATE)
-**Command**: `/workflow:concept-verify --session [sessionId]`
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
 
-**Purpose**: Verify conceptual clarity before TDD task generation
-- Clarify test requirements and acceptance criteria
-- Resolve ambiguities in expected behavior
-- Validate TDD approach is appropriate
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
 
-**Behavior**:
-- If no ambiguities found → Auto-proceed to Phase 6
-- If ambiguities exist → Interactive clarification (up to 5 questions)
-- After clarifications → Auto-proceed to Phase 6
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
 
-**Parse**: Verify concept verification completed (check for clarifications section in ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md or synthesis file if exists)
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
-### Phase 6: TDD Task Generation
+**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing test coverage results, then auto-continue to Phase 4/5 (depending on conflict_risk)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Conflict Resolution (Optional - auto-triggered by conflict risk)
+
+**Trigger**: Only execute when context-package.json indicates conflict_risk is "medium" or "high"
+
+**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+
+**Input**:
+- sessionId from Phase 1
+- contextPath from Phase 2
+- conflict_risk from context-package.json
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: Execution status (success/skipped/failed)
+- Verify: CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file path (if executed)
+
+**Validation**:
+- File `.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md` exists (if executed)
+
+**Skip Behavior**:
+- If conflict_risk is "none" or "low", skip directly to Phase 5
+- Display: "No significant conflicts detected, proceeding to TDD task generation"
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.1: Detect conflicts with CLI analysis (conflict-resolution)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.2: Present conflicts to user (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.3: Apply resolution strategies (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
+  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 4.1-4.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 4 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 4.1-4.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute conflict resolution", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing conflict resolution"},
+  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 4 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 4**: Return to user showing conflict resolution results (if executed) and selected strategies, then auto-continue to Phase 5
+
+**Memory State Check**:
+- Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
+- If memory usage is high (>110K tokens or approaching context limits):
+  - **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/compact")`
+  - This optimizes memory before proceeding to Phase 5
+- Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
+- Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: TDD Task Generation
 **Command**:
-- Manual: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]`
-- Agent: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId] --agent`
+- Agent Mode (default): `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]`
+- CLI Mode (`--cli-execute`): `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId] --cli-execute`
 
-**Parse**: Extract feature count, chain count, task count
+**Parse**: Extract feature count, task count (not chain count - tasks now contain internal TDD cycles)
 
 **Validate**:
-- IMPL_PLAN.md exists (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
-- TEST-*.json, IMPL-*.json, REFACTOR-*.json exist
-- TODO_LIST.md exists
-- IMPL tasks include test-fix-cycle configuration
+- IMPL_PLAN.md exists (unified plan with TDD Implementation Tasks section)
+- IMPL-*.json files exist (one per feature, or container + subtasks for complex features)
+- TODO_LIST.md exists with internal TDD phase indicators
+- Each IMPL task includes:
+  - `meta.tdd_workflow: true`
+  - `flow_control.implementation_approach` with 3 steps (red/green/refactor)
+  - Green phase includes test-fix-cycle configuration
 - IMPL_PLAN.md contains workflow_type: "tdd" in frontmatter
+- Task count ≤10 (compliance with task limit)
 
-### Phase 7: TDD Structure Validation & Action Plan Verification (RECOMMENDED)
+<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-tdd invoked, INSERT 3 task-generate-tdd tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5.1: Discovery - analyze TDD requirements (task-generate-tdd)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing TDD requirements"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5.2: Planning - design Red-Green-Refactor cycles (task-generate-tdd)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Designing TDD cycles"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5.3: Output - generate IMPL tasks with internal TDD phases (task-generate-tdd)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating TDD tasks"},
+  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** task-generate-tdd's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks. Each generated IMPL task will contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycle.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 5.1-5.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 5 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 5.1-5.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 5 tasks completed and collapsed to summary. Each generated IMPL task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle internally.
+
+### Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation & Action Plan Verification (RECOMMENDED)
 **Internal validation first, then recommend external verification**
 
 **Internal Validation**:
-1. Each feature has TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR chain
-2. Dependencies: IMPL depends_on TEST, REFACTOR depends_on IMPL
-3. Meta fields: tdd_phase correct ("red"/"green"/"refactor")
-4. Agents: TEST uses @code-review-test-agent, IMPL/REFACTOR use @code-developer
-5. IMPL tasks contain test-fix-cycle in flow_control for iterative Green phase
+1. Each task contains complete TDD workflow (Red-Green-Refactor internally)
+2. Task structure validation:
+   - `meta.tdd_workflow: true` in all IMPL tasks
+   - `flow_control.implementation_approach` has exactly 3 steps
+   - Each step has correct `tdd_phase`: "red", "green", "refactor"
+3. Dependency validation:
+   - Sequential features: IMPL-N depends_on ["IMPL-(N-1)"] if needed
+   - Complex features: IMPL-N.M depends_on ["IMPL-N.(M-1)"] for subtasks
+4. Agent assignment: All IMPL tasks use @code-developer
+5. Test-fix cycle: Green phase step includes test-fix-cycle logic with max_iterations
+6. Task count: Total tasks ≤10 (simple + subtasks)
 
 **Return Summary**:
 ```
 TDD Planning complete for session: [sessionId]
 
 Features analyzed: [N]
-TDD chains generated: [N]
-Total tasks: [3N]
+Total tasks: [M] (1 task per simple feature + subtasks for complex features)
+
+Task breakdown:
+- Simple features: [K] tasks (IMPL-1 to IMPL-K)
+- Complex features: [L] features with [P] subtasks
+- Total task count: [M] (within 10-task limit)
 
 Structure:
-- Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
+- IMPL-1: {Feature 1 Name} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
+- IMPL-2: {Feature 2 Name} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
+- IMPL-3: {Complex Feature} (Container)
+  - IMPL-3.1: {Sub-feature A} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
+  - IMPL-3.2: {Sub-feature B} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
 [...]
 
-Plan:
+Plans generated:
 - Unified Implementation Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
-  (includes TDD Task Chains section with workflow_type: "tdd")
+  (includes TDD Implementation Tasks section with workflow_type: "tdd")
+- Task List: .workflow/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
+  (with internal TDD phase indicators)
 
-✅ Recommended Next Steps:
-1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify TDD plan quality
+TDD Configuration:
+- Each task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle
+- Green phase includes test-fix cycle (max 3 iterations)
+- Auto-revert on max iterations reached
+
+Recommended Next Steps:
+1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify TDD plan quality and dependencies
 2. /workflow:execute --session [sessionId]  # Start TDD execution
 3. /workflow:tdd-verify [sessionId]  # Post-execution TDD compliance check
 
-⚠️ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task dependencies
+Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task structure and dependencies
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-```javascript
-// Initialize (7 phases now with concept verification)
-[
-  {content: "Execute session discovery", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing session discovery"},
-  {content: "Execute context gathering", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {content: "Execute test coverage analysis", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {content: "Execute TDD analysis", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing TDD analysis"},
-  {content: "Execute concept verification", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing concept verification"},
-  {content: "Execute TDD task generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {content: "Validate TDD structure", status: "pending", activeForm: "Validating TDD structure"}
-]
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for TDD workflow with test coverage analysis and Red-Green-Refactor cycle generation.
 
-// Update after each phase: mark current "completed", next "in_progress"
+### Key Principles
+
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 3.1, 3.2, 3.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 3.1-3.3 collapse to "Execute test coverage analysis: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins (conditional Phase 4 if conflict_risk ≥ medium) → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+### TDD-Specific Features
+
+- **Phase 3**: Test coverage analysis detects existing patterns and gaps
+- **Phase 5**: Generated IMPL tasks contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycles
+- **Conditional Phase 4**: Conflict resolution only if conflict_risk ≥ medium
+
+### Benefits
+
+- ✓ Real-time visibility into TDD workflow execution
+- ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach → execute → collapse
+- ✓ Test-aware planning with coverage analysis
+- ✓ Self-contained TDD cycles within each IMPL task
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 3, 4, 5) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
+
+## Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+TDD Workflow Orchestrator
+│
+├─ Phase 1: Session Discovery
+│  └─ /workflow:session:start --auto
+│     └─ Returns: sessionId
+│
+├─ Phase 2: Context Gathering
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:context-gather
+│     └─ Returns: context-package.json path
+│
+├─ Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis                    ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-context-gather
+│     ├─ Phase 3.1: Detect test framework
+│     ├─ Phase 3.2: Analyze existing test coverage
+│     └─ Phase 3.3: Identify coverage gaps
+│     └─ Returns: test-context-package.json           ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 4: Conflict Resolution (conditional)
+│  IF conflict_risk ≥ medium:
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:conflict-resolution             ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│     ├─ Phase 4.1: Detect conflicts with CLI
+│     ├─ Phase 4.2: Present conflicts to user
+│     └─ Phase 4.3: Apply resolution strategies
+│     └─ Returns: CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md              ← COLLAPSED
+│  ELSE:
+│  └─ Skip to Phase 5
+│
+├─ Phase 5: TDD Task Generation                       ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd
+│     ├─ Phase 5.1: Discovery - analyze TDD requirements
+│     ├─ Phase 5.2: Planning - design Red-Green-Refactor cycles
+│     └─ Phase 5.3: Output - generate IMPL tasks with internal TDD phases
+│     └─ Returns: IMPL-*.json, IMPL_PLAN.md           ← COLLAPSED
+│        (Each IMPL task contains internal Red-Green-Refactor cycle)
+│
+└─ Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation
+   └─ Internal validation + summary returned
+   └─ Recommend: /workflow:action-plan-verify
+
+Key Points:
+• ← ATTACHED: SlashCommand attaches sub-tasks to orchestrator TodoWrite
+• ← COLLAPSED: Sub-tasks executed and collapsed to phase summary
+• TDD-specific: Each generated IMPL task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle
 ```
 
 ## Input Processing
@@ -170,11 +417,6 @@ Convert user input to TDD-structured format:
 - **Command failure**: Keep phase in_progress, report error
 - **TDD validation failure**: Report incomplete chains or wrong dependencies
 
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Standard (non-TDD) planning
-- `/workflow:execute` - Execute TDD tasks
-- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Verify TDD compliance
-- `/workflow:status` - View progress
 ## TDD Workflow Enhancements
 
 ### Overview
@@ -206,7 +448,7 @@ IMPL (Green phase) tasks now include automatic test-fix cycle for resilient impl
 ```
 1. Write minimal implementation code
 2. Execute test suite
-3. IF tests pass → Complete task ✅
+3. IF tests pass → Complete task
 4. IF tests fail → Enter fix cycle:
    a. Gemini diagnoses with bug-fix template
    b. Apply fix (manual or Codex)
@@ -216,10 +458,10 @@ IMPL (Green phase) tasks now include automatic test-fix cycle for resilient impl
 ```
 
 **Benefits**:
-- ✅ Faster feedback within Green phase
-- ✅ Autonomous recovery from implementation errors
-- ✅ Systematic debugging with Gemini
-- ✅ Safe rollback prevents broken state
+- Faster feedback within Green phase
+- Autonomous recovery from implementation errors
+- Systematic debugging with Gemini
+- Safe rollback prevents broken state
 
 #### 3. Agent-Driven Planning
 **From plan --agent workflow**
@@ -232,18 +474,22 @@ Supports action-planning-agent for more autonomous TDD planning with:
 
 ### Workflow Comparison
 
-| Aspect | Previous | Current |
-|--------|----------|---------|
-| **Phases** | 5 | 6 (test coverage analysis) |
+| Aspect | Previous | Current (Optimized) |
+|--------|----------|---------------------|
+| **Phases** | 6 (with test coverage) | 7 (added concept verification) |
 | **Context** | Greenfield assumption | Existing codebase aware |
+| **Task Structure** | 1 feature = 3 tasks (TEST/IMPL/REFACTOR) | 1 feature = 1 task (internal TDD cycle) |
+| **Task Count** | 5 features = 15 tasks | 5 features = 5 tasks (70% reduction) |
 | **Green Phase** | Single implementation | Iterative with fix cycle |
 | **Failure Handling** | Manual intervention | Auto-diagnose + fix + revert |
 | **Test Analysis** | None | Deep coverage analysis |
 | **Feedback Loop** | Post-execution | During Green phase |
+| **Task Management** | High overhead (15 tasks) | Low overhead (5 tasks) |
+| **Execution Efficiency** | Frequent context switching | Continuous context per feature |
 
 ### Migration Notes
 
-**Backward Compatibility**: ✅ Fully compatible
+**Backward Compatibility**: Fully compatible
 - Existing TDD workflows continue to work
 - New features are additive, not breaking
 - Phase 3 can be skipped if test-context-gather not available
@@ -251,20 +497,47 @@ Supports action-planning-agent for more autonomous TDD planning with:
 **Session Structure**:
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-xxx/
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
-├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md (unified plan with TDD Implementation Tasks section)
+├── TODO_LIST.md (with internal TDD phase indicators)
 ├── .process/
 │   ├── context-package.json
 │   ├── test-context-package.json
 │   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (enhanced with TDD breakdown)
-│   └── green-fix-iteration-*.md (fix logs)
+│   └── green-fix-iteration-*.md (fix logs from Green phase cycles)
 └── .task/
-    ├── TEST-*.json (Red phase)
-    ├── IMPL-*.json (Green phase with test-fix-cycle)
-    └── REFACTOR-*.json (Refactor phase)
+    ├── IMPL-1.json (Complete TDD task: Red-Green-Refactor internally)
+    ├── IMPL-2.json (Complete TDD task)
+    ├── IMPL-3.json (Complex feature container, if needed)
+    ├── IMPL-3.1.json (Complex feature subtask, if needed)
+    └── IMPL-3.2.json (Complex feature subtask, if needed)
 ```
 
+**File Count Comparison**:
+- **Old structure**: 5 features = 15 task files (TEST/IMPL/REFACTOR × 5)
+- **New structure**: 5 features = 5 task files (IMPL-N × 5)
+- **Complex features**: Add container + subtasks only when necessary
+
 **Configuration Options** (in IMPL tasks):
 - `meta.max_iterations`: Fix attempts (default: 3)
 - `meta.use_codex`: Auto-fix mode (default: false)
 
+## Related Commands
+
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- None - TDD planning is self-contained (can optionally run brainstorm commands before)
+
+**Called by This Command** (6 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create or discover TDD workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2: Gather project context and analyze codebase
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 3: Analyze existing test patterns and coverage
+- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 4: Detect and resolve conflicts (auto-triggered if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
+- `/compact` - Phase 4: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` - Phase 5: Generate TDD tasks with agent-driven approach (default, autonomous)
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --cli-execute` - Phase 5: Generate TDD tasks with CLI tools (Gemini/Qwen, when `--cli-execute` flag used)
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:action-plan-verify` - Recommended: Verify TDD plan quality and structure before execution
+- `/workflow:status` - Review TDD task breakdown
+- `/workflow:execute` - Begin TDD implementation
+- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Post-execution: Verify TDD compliance and generate quality report
+

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-verify.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-verify
-description: Verify TDD workflow compliance and generate quality report
+description: Verify TDD workflow compliance against Red-Green-Refactor cycles, generate quality report with coverage analysis
 
 argument-hint: "[optional: WFS-session-id]"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*)
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini:*)
 ---
 
 # TDD Verification Command (/workflow:tdd-verify)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent' {} \;
 **Gemini analysis for comprehensive TDD compliance report**
 
 ```bash
-cd project-root && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+cd project-root && gemini -p "
 PURPOSE: Generate TDD compliance report
 TASK: Analyze TDD workflow execution and generate quality report
 CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{sessionId}/.task/*.json,.workflow/{sessionId}/.summaries/*,.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md}
@@ -118,14 +118,14 @@ RULES: Focus on TDD best practices and workflow adherence. Be specific about vio
 TDD Verification Report - Session: {sessionId}
 
 ## Chain Validation
-✅ Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1 (Complete)
-✅ Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1 (Complete)
-⚠️  Feature 3: TEST-3.1 → IMPL-3.1 (Missing REFACTOR phase)
+[COMPLETE] Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1 (Complete)
+[COMPLETE] Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1 (Complete)
+[INCOMPLETE] Feature 3: TEST-3.1 → IMPL-3.1 (Missing REFACTOR phase)
 
 ## Test Execution
-✅ All TEST tasks produced failing tests
-✅ All IMPL tasks made tests pass
-✅ All REFACTOR tasks maintained green tests
+All TEST tasks produced failing tests
+All IMPL tasks made tests pass
+All REFACTOR tasks maintained green tests
 
 ## Coverage Metrics
 Line Coverage: {percentage}%
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ Final Score: Max(0, Base Score - Deductions)
 
 ### Command Chain
 - **Called After**: `/workflow:execute` (when TDD tasks completed)
-- **Calls**: `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis`, Gemini wrapper
+- **Calls**: `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis`, Gemini CLI
 - **Related**: `/workflow:tdd-plan`, `/workflow:status`
 
 ### Basic Usage
@@ -271,20 +271,20 @@ Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
 ## Chain Analysis
 
 ### Feature 1: {Feature Name}
-**Status**: ✅ Complete
+**Status**: Complete
 **Chain**: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
 
-- ✅ **Red Phase**: Test created and failed with clear message
-- ✅ **Green Phase**: Minimal implementation made test pass
-- ✅ **Refactor Phase**: Code improved, tests remained green
+- **Red Phase**: Test created and failed with clear message
+- **Green Phase**: Minimal implementation made test pass
+- **Refactor Phase**: Code improved, tests remained green
 
 ### Feature 2: {Feature Name}
-**Status**: ⚠️ Incomplete
+**Status**: Incomplete
 **Chain**: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 (Missing REFACTOR-2.1)
 
-- ✅ **Red Phase**: Test created and failed
-- ⚠️ **Green Phase**: Implementation seems over-engineered
-- ❌ **Refactor Phase**: Missing
+- **Red Phase**: Test created and failed
+- **Green Phase**: Implementation seems over-engineered
+- **Refactor Phase**: Missing
 
 **Issues**:
 - REFACTOR-2.1 task not completed
@@ -306,16 +306,16 @@ Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
 ## TDD Cycle Validation
 
 ### Red Phase (Write Failing Test)
-- ✅ {N}/{total} features had failing tests initially
-- ⚠️ Feature 3: No evidence of initial test failure
+- {N}/{total} features had failing tests initially
+- Feature 3: No evidence of initial test failure
 
 ### Green Phase (Make Test Pass)
-- ✅ {N}/{total} implementations made tests pass
-- ✅ All implementations minimal and focused
+- {N}/{total} implementations made tests pass
+- All implementations minimal and focused
 
 ### Refactor Phase (Improve Quality)
-- ⚠️ {N}/{total} features completed refactoring
-- ❌ Feature 2, 4: Refactoring step skipped
+- {N}/{total} features completed refactoring
+- Feature 2, 4: Refactoring step skipped
 
 ## Best Practices Assessment
 
@@ -351,8 +351,3 @@ Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
 {Summary of compliance status and next steps}
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:tdd-plan` - Creates TDD workflow
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes TDD tasks
-- `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis` - Analyzes test coverage
-- `/workflow:status` - Views workflow progress

.claude/commands/workflow/test-cycle-execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+name: test-cycle-execute
+description: Execute test-fix workflow with dynamic task generation and iterative fix cycles until test pass rate >= 95% or max iterations reached. Uses @cli-planning-agent for failure analysis and task generation.
+argument-hint: "[--resume-session=\"session-id\"] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Test-Cycle-Execute Command
+
+## Overview
+Orchestrates dynamic test-fix workflow execution through iterative cycles of testing, analysis, and fixing. **Unlike standard execute, this command dynamically generates intermediate tasks** during execution based on test results and CLI analysis, enabling adaptive problem-solving.
+
+**Quality Gate**: Iterates until test pass rate >= 95% (with criticality assessment) or 100% for full approval.
+
+**CRITICAL - Orchestrator Boundary**:
+- This command is the **ONLY place** where test failures are handled
+- All failure analysis and fix task generation delegated to **@cli-planning-agent**
+- Orchestrator calculates pass rate, assesses criticality, and manages iteration loop
+- @test-fix-agent executes tests and applies fixes, reports results back
+- **Do NOT handle test failures in main workflow or other commands** - always delegate to this orchestrator
+
+**Resume Mode**: When called with `--resume-session` flag, skips discovery and continues from interruption point.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+
+### Dynamic vs Static Execution
+**Standard Execute**: Pre-defined task queue → Sequential execution → Complete
+**Test Execute**: Initial tasks → Test → Analyze → Generate fix tasks → Execute → Re-test → Repeat
+
+### Iteration Loop Pattern
+```
+1. Execute current task (test/implement)
+2. Run tests and collect results
+3. If failures: CLI analysis → Generate fix tasks → Execute → Back to 2
+4. If success: Mark complete → Next task
+5. Repeat until all tests pass or max iterations reached
+```
+
+### Agent Coordination
+- **@code-developer**: Understands requirements, generates implementations
+- **@test-fix-agent**: Executes tests, applies fixes, validates results, assigns criticality
+- **@cli-planning-agent**: Executes CLI analysis (Gemini/Qwen), parses results, generates fix task JSONs
+
+## Core Rules
+1. **Dynamic Task Generation**: Create intermediate fix tasks via @cli-planning-agent based on test failures
+2. **Iterative Execution**: Repeat test-fix cycles until pass rate >= 95% (with criticality assessment) or max iterations
+3. **Pass Rate Threshold**: Target 95%+ pass rate; 100% for full approval; assess criticality for 95-100% range
+4. **Agent-Based Analysis**: Delegate CLI execution and task generation to @cli-planning-agent
+5. **Agent Delegation**: All execution delegated to specialized agents (@cli-planning-agent, @test-fix-agent)
+6. **Context Accumulation**: Each iteration builds on previous attempt context
+7. **Autonomous Completion**: Continue until pass rate >= 95% without user interruption
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+- **Session Discovery**: Identify test-fix workflow sessions
+- **Task Queue Management**: Maintain dynamic task queue with runtime additions
+- **Test Execution**: Run tests through @test-fix-agent
+- **Pass Rate Calculation**: Calculate test pass rate from test-results.json (passed/total * 100)
+- **Criticality Assessment**: Evaluate failure severity using test-results.json criticality field
+- **Threshold Decision**: Determine if pass rate >= 95% with criticality consideration
+- **Failure Analysis Delegation**: Invoke @cli-planning-agent for CLI analysis and task generation
+- **Iteration Control**: Manage fix cycles with max iteration limits (5 default)
+- **Context Propagation**: Pass failure context and fix history to @cli-planning-agent
+- **Progress Tracking**: TodoWrite updates for entire iteration cycle
+- **Session Auto-Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when pass rate >= 95% (or 100%)
+
+## Responsibility Matrix
+
+**CRITICAL - Clear division of labor between orchestrator and agents:**
+
+| Responsibility | test-cycle-execute (Orchestrator) | @cli-planning-agent | @test-fix-agent (Executor) |
+|----------------|----------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------|
+| Manage iteration loop | Yes - Controls loop flow | No - Not involved | No - Executes single task |
+| Calculate pass rate | Yes - From test-results.json | No - Not involved | No - Reports test results |
+| Assess criticality | Yes - From test-results.json | No - Not involved | Yes - Assigns criticality in test results |
+| Run CLI analysis (Gemini/Qwen) | No - Delegates to cli-planning-agent | Yes - Executes CLI internally | No - Not involved |
+| Parse CLI output | No - Delegated | Yes - Extracts fix strategy | No - Not involved |
+| Generate IMPL-fix-N.json | No - Delegated | Yes - Creates task files | No - Not involved |
+| Run tests | No - Delegates to agent | No - Not involved | Yes - Executes test command |
+| Apply fixes | No - Delegates to agent | No - Not involved | Yes - Modifies code |
+| Detect test failures | Yes - Analyzes pass rate and decides next action | No - Not involved | Yes - Executes tests and reports outcomes |
+| Add tasks to queue | Yes - Manages queue | No - Returns task ID | No - Not involved |
+| Update iteration state | Yes - Maintains overall iteration state | No - Not involved | Yes - Updates individual task status only |
+
+**Key Principles**:
+- Orchestrator manages the "what" (iteration flow, threshold decisions) and "when" (task scheduling)
+- @cli-planning-agent executes the "analysis" (CLI execution, result parsing, task generation)
+- @test-fix-agent executes the "how" (run tests, apply fixes)
+
+**ENFORCEMENT**: If test failures occur outside this orchestrator, do NOT handle them inline - always call `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` instead.
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+1. **Detect Session Type**: Identify test-fix session from `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+2. **Load Session State**: Read `workflow-session.json`, `IMPL_PLAN.md`, `TODO_LIST.md`
+3. **Scan Initial Tasks**: Analyze `.task/*.json` files
+4. **Initialize TodoWrite**: Create task list including initial tasks
+5. **Prepare Iteration Context**: Setup iteration counter and max limits
+
+**Resume Mode**: Load existing iteration context from `.process/iteration-state.json`
+
+### Phase 2: Task Execution Loop
+**Main execution loop with dynamic task generation (executed by test-cycle-execute orchestrator):**
+
+**Execution Order**: The workflow begins by executing IMPL-001 (test generation) first. Upon successful completion, IMPL-002 (test-fix cycle) is initiated, starting the iterative test-fix loop.
+
+```
+For each task in queue:
+  1. [Orchestrator] Load task JSON and context
+  2. [Orchestrator] Determine task type (test-gen, test-fix, fix-iteration)
+  3. [Orchestrator] Execute task through appropriate agent
+  4. [Orchestrator] Collect agent results from .process/test-results.json
+  5. [Orchestrator] Calculate test pass rate:
+     a. Parse test-results.json: passRate = (passed / total) * 100
+     b. Assess failure criticality (from test-results.json)
+     c. Evaluate fix effectiveness (NEW):
+        - Compare passRate with previous iteration
+        - If passRate decreased by >10%: REGRESSION detected
+        - If regression: Rollback last fix, skip to next strategy
+  6. [Orchestrator] Make threshold decision:
+     IF passRate === 100%:
+       → SUCCESS: Mark task complete, update TodoWrite, continue
+     ELSE IF passRate >= 95%:
+       → REVIEW: Check failure criticality
+       → If all failures are "low" criticality: PARTIAL SUCCESS (approve with note)
+       → If any "high" or "medium" criticality: Enter fix loop (step 7)
+     ELSE IF passRate < 95%:
+       → FAILED: Enter fix loop (step 7)
+  7. If entering fix loop (pass rate < 95% OR critical failures exist):
+     a. [Orchestrator] Invoke @cli-planning-agent with failure context
+     b. [Agent] Executes CLI analysis + generates IMPL-fix-N.json
+     c. [Orchestrator] Insert fix task at front of queue
+     d. [Orchestrator] Continue loop
+  8. [Orchestrator] Check max iterations limit (abort if exceeded)
+```
+
+**Note**: The orchestrator controls the loop. Agents execute individual tasks and return results.
+
+### Phase 3: Iteration Cycle (Test-Fix Loop)
+
+**Orchestrator-controlled iteration with agent delegation:**
+
+#### Iteration Structure
+```
+Iteration N (managed by test-cycle-execute orchestrator):
+├── 1. Test Execution & Pass Rate Validation
+│   ├── [Orchestrator] Launch @test-fix-agent with test task
+│   ├── [Agent] Run test suite and save results to test-results.json
+│   ├── [Agent] Report completion back to orchestrator
+│   ├── [Orchestrator] Calculate pass rate: (passed / total) * 100
+│   └── [Orchestrator] Assess failure criticality from test-results.json
+├── 2. Failure Analysis & Task Generation (via @cli-planning-agent)
+│   ├── [Orchestrator] Assemble failure context package (tests, errors, pass_rate)
+│   ├── [Orchestrator] Invoke @cli-planning-agent with context
+│   ├── [@cli-planning-agent] Execute CLI tool (Gemini/Qwen) internally
+│   ├── [@cli-planning-agent] Parse CLI output for root causes and fix strategy
+│   ├── [@cli-planning-agent] Generate IMPL-fix-N.json with structured task
+│   ├── [@cli-planning-agent] Save analysis to iteration-N-analysis.md
+│   └── [Orchestrator] Receive task ID and insert into queue (front position)
+├── 3. Fix Execution
+│   ├── [Orchestrator] Launch @test-fix-agent with IMPL-fix-N task
+│   ├── [Agent] Load fix strategy from task.context.fix_strategy
+│   ├── [Agent] Apply surgical fixes to identified files
+│   └── [Agent] Report completion
+└── 4. Re-test
+    └── [Orchestrator] Return to step 1 with updated code
+```
+
+**Key Changes**:
+- CLI analysis + task generation encapsulated in @cli-planning-agent
+- Pass rate calculation added to test execution step
+- Orchestrator only assembles context and invokes agent
+
+#### Iteration Task JSON Template
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-fix-{iteration}",
+  "title": "Fix test failures - Iteration {N}",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "iteration": N,
+    "parent_task": "IMPL-002",
+    "max_iterations": 5
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Fix identified test failures",
+      "Address root causes from analysis"
+    ],
+    "failure_context": {
+      "failed_tests": ["test1", "test2"],
+      "error_messages": ["error1", "error2"],
+      "failure_analysis": "Raw test output and error messages",
+      "previous_attempts": ["iteration-1 context"]
+    },
+    "fix_strategy": {
+      "approach": "Generated by CLI tool (Gemini/Qwen) analysis",
+      "modification_points": ["file1:func1", "file2:func2"],
+      "expected_outcome": "All tests pass"
+    },
+    "depends_on": ["IMPL-fix-{N-1}"],
+    "inherited": {
+      "iteration_history": [...]
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_failure_context",
+        "command": "Read(.workflow/{session}/.process/iteration-{N-1}-failures.json)",
+        "output_to": "previous_failures",
+        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_fix_strategy",
+        "command": "Read(.workflow/{session}/.process/iteration-{N}-strategy.md)",
+        "output_to": "fix_strategy",
+        "on_error": "fail"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Apply fixes from strategy",
+        "description": "Implement fixes identified by CLI analysis",
+        "modification_points": "From fix_strategy",
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load failure context and strategy",
+          "Apply surgical fixes",
+          "Run tests",
+          "Validate fixes"
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": ["from fix_strategy"],
+    "exit_conditions": {
+      "success": "all_tests_pass",
+      "failure": "max_iterations_reached",
+      "max_iterations": 5
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Agent-Based Failure Analysis & Task Generation
+
+**Orchestrator delegates CLI analysis and task generation to @cli-planning-agent:**
+
+#### When Test Failures Occur (Pass Rate < 95% OR Critical Failures)
+1. **[Orchestrator]** Detects failures from test-results.json
+2. **[Orchestrator]** Check for repeated failures (NEW):
+   - Compare failed_tests with previous 2 iterations
+   - If same test failed 3 times consecutively: Mark as "stuck"
+   - If >50% of failures are "stuck": Switch analysis strategy or abort
+3. **[Orchestrator]** Extracts failure context:
+   - Failed tests with criticality assessment
+   - Error messages and stack traces
+   - Current pass rate
+   - Previous iteration attempts (if any)
+   - Stuck test markers (NEW)
+4. **[Orchestrator]** Assembles context package for @cli-planning-agent
+5. **[Orchestrator]** Invokes @cli-planning-agent via Task tool
+6. **[@cli-planning-agent]** Executes internally:
+   - Runs Gemini/Qwen CLI analysis with bug diagnosis template
+   - Parses CLI output to extract root causes and fix strategy
+   - Generates `IMPL-fix-N.json` with structured task definition
+   - Saves analysis report to `.process/iteration-N-analysis.md`
+   - Saves raw CLI output to `.process/iteration-N-cli-output.txt`
+7. **[Orchestrator]** Receives task ID from agent and inserts into queue
+
+**Key Change**: CLI execution + result parsing + task generation are now encapsulated in @cli-planning-agent, simplifying orchestrator logic.
+
+#### Agent Invocation Pattern (executed by orchestrator)
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-planning-agent",
+  description=`Analyze test failures and generate fix task (iteration ${currentIteration})`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Context Package
+    {
+      "session_id": "${sessionId}",
+      "iteration": ${currentIteration},
+      "analysis_type": "test-failure",
+      "failure_context": {
+        "failed_tests": ${JSON.stringify(failedTests)},
+        "error_messages": ${JSON.stringify(errorMessages)},
+        "test_output": "${testOutputPath}",
+        "pass_rate": ${passRate},
+        "previous_attempts": ${JSON.stringify(previousAttempts)}
+      },
+      "cli_config": {
+        "tool": "gemini",
+        "model": "gemini-3-pro-preview-11-2025",
+        "template": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+        "timeout": 2400000,
+        "fallback": "qwen"
+      },
+      "task_config": {
+        "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+        "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+        "max_iterations": ${maxIterations},
+        "use_codex": false
+      }
+    }
+
+    ## Your Task
+    1. Execute CLI analysis using Gemini (fallback to Qwen if needed)
+    2. Parse CLI output and extract fix strategy with specific modification points
+    3. Generate IMPL-fix-${currentIteration}.json using your internal task template
+    4. Save analysis report to .process/iteration-${currentIteration}-analysis.md
+    5. Report success and task ID back to orchestrator
+  `
+)
+```
+
+#### Agent Response
+```javascript
+{
+  "status": "success",
+  "task_id": "IMPL-fix-${iteration}",
+  "task_path": ".workflow/${session}/.task/IMPL-fix-${iteration}.json",
+  "analysis_report": ".process/iteration-${iteration}-analysis.md",
+  "cli_output": ".process/iteration-${iteration}-cli-output.txt",
+  "summary": "Fix authentication token validation and null check issues",
+  "modification_points_count": 2,
+  "estimated_complexity": "low"
+}
+```
+
+#### Generated Analysis Report Structure
+The @cli-planning-agent generates `.process/iteration-N-analysis.md`:
+
+```markdown
+---
+iteration: N
+analysis_type: test-failure
+cli_tool: gemini
+model: gemini-3-pro-preview-11-2025
+timestamp: 2025-11-10T10:00:00Z
+pass_rate: 85.0%
+---
+
+# Test Failure Analysis - Iteration N
+
+## Summary
+- **Failed Tests**: 2
+- **Pass Rate**: 85.0% (Target: 95%+)
+- **Root Causes Identified**: 2
+- **Modification Points**: 2
+
+## Failed Tests Details
+
+### test_auth_flow
+- **Error**: Expected 200, got 401
+- **File**: tests/test_auth.test.ts:45
+- **Criticality**: high
+
+### test_data_validation
+- **Error**: TypeError: Cannot read property 'name' of undefined
+- **File**: tests/test_validators.test.ts:23
+- **Criticality**: medium
+
+## Root Cause Analysis
+[CLI output: 根本原因分析 section]
+
+## Fix Strategy
+[CLI output: 详细修复建议 section]
+
+## Modification Points
+- `src/auth/client.ts:sendRequest:45-50` - Add authentication token header
+- `src/validators/user.ts:validateUser:23-25` - Add null check before property access
+
+## Expected Outcome
+[CLI output: 验证建议 section]
+
+## CLI Raw Output
+See: `.process/iteration-N-cli-output.txt`
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Task Queue Management
+
+**Orchestrator maintains dynamic task queue with runtime insertions:**
+
+#### Dynamic Queue Operations
+```
+Initial Queue: [IMPL-001, IMPL-002]
+
+After IMPL-002 execution (test failures detected by orchestrator):
+  [Orchestrator] Generates IMPL-fix-1.json
+  [Orchestrator] Inserts at front: [IMPL-fix-1, IMPL-002-retest, ...]
+
+After IMPL-fix-1 execution (still failures):
+  [Orchestrator] Generates IMPL-fix-2.json
+  [Orchestrator] Inserts at front: [IMPL-fix-2, IMPL-002-retest, ...]
+
+After IMPL-fix-2 execution (success):
+  [Orchestrator] Continues to: [IMPL-002-complete, ...]
+```
+
+#### Queue Priority Rules (orchestrator-managed)
+1. **Fix tasks**: Inserted at queue front for immediate execution
+2. **Retest tasks**: Automatically scheduled after fix tasks
+3. **Regular tasks**: Standard dependency order preserved
+4. **Iteration limit**: Max 5 fix iterations per test task (orchestrator enforces)
+
+### Phase 6: Completion & Session Management
+
+#### Success Conditions
+- All initial tasks completed
+- All generated fix tasks completed
+- **Test pass rate === 100%** (all tests passing)
+- No pending tasks in queue
+
+#### Partial Success Conditions (NEW)
+- All initial tasks completed
+- Test pass rate >= 95% AND < 100%
+- All failures are "low" criticality (flaky tests, env-specific issues)
+- **Automatic Approval with Warning**: System auto-approves but marks session with review flag
+- Note: Generate completion summary with detailed warnings about low-criticality failures
+
+#### Completion Steps
+1. **Final Validation**: Run full test suite one more time
+2. **Calculate Final Pass Rate**: Parse test-results.json
+3. **Assess Completion Status**:
+   - If pass_rate === 100% → Full Success
+   - If pass_rate >= 95% + all "low" criticality → Partial Success (add review note)
+   - If pass_rate >= 95% + any "high"/"medium" criticality → Continue iteration
+   - If pass_rate < 95% → Failure
+4. **Update Session State**: Mark all tasks completed (or blocked if failure)
+5. **Generate Summary**: Create session completion summary with pass rate metrics
+6. **Update TodoWrite**: Mark all items completed
+7. **Auto-Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` (for Full or Partial Success)
+
+#### Failure Conditions
+- Max iterations (5) reached without achieving 95% pass rate
+- **Test pass rate < 95% after max iterations** (NEW)
+- Pass rate >= 95% but critical failures exist and max iterations reached
+- Unrecoverable test failures (infinite loop detection)
+- Agent execution errors
+
+#### Failure Handling
+1. **Document State**: Save current iteration context with final pass rate
+2. **Generate Failure Report**: Include:
+   - Final pass rate (e.g., "85% after 5 iterations")
+   - Remaining failures with criticality assessment
+   - Iteration history and attempted fixes
+   - CLI analysis quality (normal/degraded)
+   - Recommendations for manual intervention
+3. **Preserve Context**: Keep all iteration logs and analysis reports
+4. **Mark Blocked**: Update task status to blocked
+5. **Return Control**: Return to user with detailed failure report
+
+#### Degraded Analysis Handling (NEW)
+When @cli-planning-agent returns `status: "degraded"` (both Gemini and Qwen failed):
+1. **Log Warning**: Record CLI analysis failure in iteration-state.json
+2. **Assess Risk**: Check if degraded analysis is acceptable:
+   - If iteration < 3 AND pass_rate improved: Accept degraded analysis, continue
+   - If iteration >= 3 OR pass_rate stagnant: Skip iteration, mark as blocked
+3. **User Notification**: Include CLI failure in completion summary
+4. **Fallback Strategy**: Use basic pattern matching from fix-history.json
+
+## TodoWrite Coordination
+
+### TodoWrite Structure for Test-Execute
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-001: Generate tests [code-developer]",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Executing test generation"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-002: Test & Fix Cycle [test-fix-agent] [ITERATION]",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Running test-fix iteration cycle"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "  → Iteration 1: Initial test run",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Running initial tests"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "  → Iteration 2: Fix auth issues",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Fixing authentication issues"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "  → Iteration 3: Re-test and validate",
+      status: "pending",
+      activeForm: "Re-testing after fixes"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Update Rules
+1. **Initial Tasks**: Standard task list
+2. **Iteration Start**: Add nested iteration item
+3. **Fix Task Added**: Add fix task as nested item
+4. **Iteration Complete**: Mark iteration item completed
+5. **All Complete**: Mark parent task completed
+
+## Agent Context Package
+
+**Generated by test-cycle-execute orchestrator before launching agents.**
+
+The orchestrator assembles this context package from:
+- Task JSON file (IMPL-*.json)
+- Iteration state files
+- Test results and failure context
+- Session metadata
+
+This package is passed to agents via the Task tool's prompt context.
+
+### Enhanced Context for Test-Fix Agent
+```json
+{
+  "task": { /* IMPL-fix-N.json */ },
+  "iteration_context": {
+    "current_iteration": N,
+    "max_iterations": 5,
+    "previous_attempts": [
+      {
+        "iteration": N-1,
+        "failures": ["test1", "test2"],
+        "fixes_attempted": ["fix1", "fix2"],
+        "result": "partial_success"
+      }
+    ],
+    "failure_analysis": {
+      "source": "gemini_cli",
+      "analysis_file": ".process/iteration-N-analysis.md",
+      "fix_strategy": { /* from CLI */ }
+    }
+  },
+  "test_context": {
+    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|...",
+    "test_files": ["path/to/test1.test.ts"],
+    "test_command": "npm test",
+    "coverage_target": 80
+  },
+  "session": {
+    "workflow_dir": ".workflow/WFS-test-{session}/",
+    "iteration_state_file": ".process/iteration-state.json",
+    "test_results_file": ".process/test-results.json",
+    "fix_history_file": ".process/fix-history.json"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## File Structure
+
+### Test-Fix Session Files
+```
+.workflow/WFS-test-{session}/
+├── workflow-session.json          # Session metadata with workflow_type
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                   # Test plan
+├── TODO_LIST.md                   # Progress tracking
+├── .task/
+│   ├── IMPL-001.json              # Test generation task
+│   ├── IMPL-002.json              # Initial test-fix task
+│   ├── IMPL-fix-1.json            # Generated: Iteration 1 fix
+│   ├── IMPL-fix-2.json            # Generated: Iteration 2 fix
+│   └── ...
+├── .summaries/
+│   ├── IMPL-001-summary.md
+│   ├── IMPL-002-summary.md
+│   └── iteration-summaries/
+│       ├── iteration-1.md
+│       ├── iteration-2.md
+│       └── ...
+└── .process/
+    ├── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md   # From planning phase
+    ├── iteration-state.json       # Current iteration state
+    ├── test-results.json          # Latest test results
+    ├── test-output.log            # Full test output
+    ├── fix-history.json           # All fix attempts
+    ├── iteration-1-analysis.md    # CLI analysis for iteration 1
+    ├── iteration-1-failures.json  # Failures from iteration 1
+    ├── iteration-1-strategy.md    # Fix strategy for iteration 1
+    ├── iteration-2-analysis.md
+    └── ...
+```
+
+### Iteration State JSON
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-test-user-auth",
+  "current_task": "IMPL-002",
+  "current_iteration": 2,
+  "max_iterations": 5,
+  "started_at": "2025-10-17T10:00:00Z",
+  "iterations": [
+    {
+      "iteration": 1,
+      "started_at": "2025-10-17T10:05:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-10-17T10:15:00Z",
+      "test_results": {
+        "total": 10,
+        "passed": 7,
+        "failed": 3,
+        "failures": ["test1", "test2", "test3"]
+      },
+      "analysis_file": ".process/iteration-1-analysis.md",
+      "fix_task": "IMPL-fix-1",
+      "result": "partial_success"
+    }
+  ],
+  "status": "active",
+  "next_action": "execute_fix_task"
+}
+```
+
+## Agent Prompt Template
+
+**Unified template for all agent tasks (orchestrator invokes with Task tool):**
+
+```bash
+Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
+     prompt="**TASK EXECUTION: {task.title}**
+
+     ## STEP 1: Load Complete Task JSON
+     **MANDATORY**: First load the complete task JSON from: {session.task_json_path}
+
+     cat {session.task_json_path}
+
+     **CRITICAL**: Validate all required fields present
+
+     ## STEP 2: Task Context (From Loaded JSON)
+     **ID**: {task.id}
+     **Type**: {task.meta.type}
+     **Agent**: {task.meta.agent}
+
+     ## STEP 3: Execute Task Based on Type
+
+     ### For test-gen (IMPL-001):
+     - Generate tests based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+     - Follow test framework conventions
+     - Create test files in target_files
+
+     ### For test-fix (IMPL-002):
+     - Run test suite: {test_command}
+     - Collect results to .process/test-results.json
+     - Report results to orchestrator (do NOT analyze failures)
+     - Orchestrator will handle failure detection and iteration decisions
+     - If success: Mark complete
+
+     ### For test-fix-iteration (IMPL-fix-N):
+     - Load fix strategy from context.fix_strategy (CONTENT, not path)
+     - Apply surgical fixes to identified files
+     - Return results to orchestrator
+     - Do NOT run tests independently - orchestrator manages all test execution
+     - Do NOT handle failures - orchestrator analyzes and decides next iteration
+
+     ## STEP 4: Implementation Context (From JSON)
+     **Requirements**: {context.requirements}
+     **Fix Strategy**: {context.fix_strategy} (full content provided in task JSON)
+     **Failure Context**: {context.failure_context}
+     **Iteration History**: {context.inherited.iteration_history}
+
+     ## STEP 5: Flow Control Execution
+     If flow_control.pre_analysis exists, execute steps sequentially
+
+     ## STEP 6: Agent Completion
+     1. Execute task following implementation_approach
+     2. Update task status in JSON
+     3. Update TODO_LIST.md
+     4. Generate summary in .summaries/
+     5. **CRITICAL**: Save results for orchestrator to analyze
+
+     **Output Requirements**:
+     - test-results.json: Structured test results
+     - test-output.log: Full test output
+     - iteration-state.json: Current iteration state (if applicable)
+     - task-summary.md: Completion summary
+
+     **Return to Orchestrator**: Agent completes and returns. Orchestrator decides next action.
+     "),
+     description="Execute {task.type} task with JSON validation")
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+- Agent executes single task and returns
+- Orchestrator analyzes results and decides next step
+- Fix strategy content (not path) embedded in task JSON by orchestrator
+- Agent does not manage iteration loop
+
+## Error Handling & Recovery
+
+### Iteration Failure Scenarios
+| Scenario | Handling | Recovery |
+|----------|----------|----------|
+| Test execution error | Log error, save context | Retry with error context |
+| CLI analysis failure | Fallback to Qwen, or manual analysis | Retry analysis with different tool |
+| Agent execution error | Save iteration state | Retry agent with simplified context |
+| Max iterations reached | Generate failure report | Mark blocked, return to user |
+| Unexpected test regression | Rollback last fix | Analyze regression, add to fix strategy |
+
+### Recovery Procedures
+
+#### Resume from Interruption
+```bash
+# Load iteration state
+iteration_state=$(cat .workflow/{session}/.process/iteration-state.json)
+current_iteration=$(jq -r '.current_iteration' <<< "$iteration_state")
+
+# Determine resume point
+if [[ "$(jq -r '.next_action' <<< "$iteration_state")" == "execute_fix_task" ]]; then
+  # Resume fix task execution
+  task_id="IMPL-fix-${current_iteration}"
+else
+  # Resume test execution
+  task_id="IMPL-002"
+fi
+```
+
+#### Rollback Failed Fix
+```bash
+# Revert last commit (if fixes were committed)
+git revert HEAD
+
+# Remove failed fix task
+rm .workflow/{session}/.task/IMPL-fix-{N}.json
+
+# Restore iteration state
+jq '.current_iteration -= 1' iteration-state.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json iteration-state.json
+
+# Re-run analysis with additional context
+# Include failure reason in next analysis
+```
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+# Execute test-fix workflow
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute
+
+# Resume interrupted session
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute --resume-session="WFS-test-user-auth"
+
+# Set custom iteration limit
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute --max-iterations=10
+```
+
+### Integration with Planning
+```bash
+# 1. Plan test workflow
+/workflow:test-fix-gen WFS-user-auth
+
+# 2. Execute with dynamic iteration
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute
+
+# 3. Monitor progress
+/workflow:status
+
+# 4. Resume if interrupted
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute --resume-session="WFS-test-user-auth"
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Set Realistic Iteration Limits**: Default 5, increase for complex fixes
+2. **Commit Between Iterations**: Easier rollback if needed
+3. **Monitor Iteration Logs**: Review CLI analysis for insights
+4. **Incremental Fixes**: Prefer multiple small iterations over large changes
+5. **Verify No Regressions**: Check all tests pass, not just previously failing ones
+6. **Preserve Context**: All iteration artifacts saved for debugging
+

.claude/commands/workflow/test-fix-gen.md

@@ -0,0 +1,657 @@
+---
+name: test-fix-gen
+description: Create test-fix workflow session from session ID, description, or file path with test strategy generation and task planning
+argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] (source-session-id | \"feature description\" | /path/to/file.md)"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Test-Fix Generation Command (/workflow:test-fix-gen)
+
+## Overview
+
+### What It Does
+
+This command creates an independent test-fix workflow session for existing code. It orchestrates a 5-phase process to analyze implementation, generate test requirements, and create executable test generation and fix tasks.
+
+**CRITICAL - Command Scope**:
+- **This command ONLY generates task JSON files** (IMPL-001.json, IMPL-002.json)
+- **Does NOT execute tests or apply fixes** - all execution happens in separate orchestrator
+- **Must call `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`** after this command to actually run tests and fixes
+- **Test failure handling happens in test-cycle-execute**, not here
+
+### Dual-Mode Support
+
+**Automatic mode detection** based on input pattern:
+
+| Mode | Input Pattern | Context Source | Use Case |
+|------|--------------|----------------|----------|
+| **Session Mode** | `WFS-xxx` | Source session summaries | Test validation for completed workflow |
+| **Prompt Mode** | Text or file path | Direct codebase analysis | Test generation from description |
+
+**Detection Logic**:
+```bash
+if [[ "$input" == WFS-* ]]; then
+  MODE="session"  # Use test-context-gather
+else
+  MODE="prompt"   # Use context-gather
+fi
+```
+
+### Core Principles
+
+- **Dual Input Support**: Accepts session ID (WFS-xxx) or feature description/file path
+- **Session Isolation**: Creates independent `WFS-test-[slug]` session
+- **Context-First**: Gathers implementation context via appropriate method
+- **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` tasks with `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` for automation
+- **Automatic Detection**: Input pattern determines execution mode
+
+### Coordinator Role
+
+This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
+- Does NOT analyze code directly
+- Does NOT generate tests or documentation
+- Does NOT execute tests or apply fixes
+- Does NOT handle test failures or iterations
+- ONLY coordinates slash commands to generate task JSON files
+- Parses outputs to pass data between phases
+- Creates independent test workflow session
+- **All execution delegated to `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`**
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
+
+---
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+# Basic syntax
+/workflow:test-fix-gen [FLAGS] <INPUT>
+
+# Flags (optional)
+--use-codex        # Enable Codex automated fixes in IMPL-002
+--cli-execute      # Enable CLI execution in IMPL-001
+
+# Input
+<INPUT>            # Session ID, description, or file path
+```
+
+### Usage Examples
+
+#### Session Mode
+```bash
+# Test validation for completed implementation
+/workflow:test-fix-gen WFS-user-auth-v2
+
+# With automated fixes
+/workflow:test-fix-gen --use-codex WFS-api-endpoints
+
+# With CLI execution
+/workflow:test-fix-gen --cli-execute --use-codex WFS-payment-flow
+```
+
+#### Prompt Mode - Text Description
+```bash
+# Generate tests from feature description
+/workflow:test-fix-gen "Test the user authentication API endpoints in src/auth/api.ts"
+
+# With automated fixes
+/workflow:test-fix-gen --use-codex "Test user registration and login flows"
+```
+
+#### Prompt Mode - File Reference
+```bash
+# Generate tests from requirements file
+/workflow:test-fix-gen ./docs/api-requirements.md
+
+# With flags
+/workflow:test-fix-gen --use-codex --cli-execute ./specs/feature.md
+```
+
+### Mode Comparison
+
+| Aspect | Session Mode | Prompt Mode |
+|--------|-------------|-------------|
+| **Phase 1** | Create `WFS-test-[source]` with `source_session_id` | Create `WFS-test-[slug]` without `source_session_id` |
+| **Phase 2** | `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` | `/workflow:tools:context-gather` |
+| **Phase 3-5** | Identical | Identical |
+| **Context** | Source session summaries + artifacts | Direct codebase analysis |
+
+---
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Core Execution Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite, second is Phase 1 session creation
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase for next phase
+4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 5 completes
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+7. **Automatic Detection**: Mode auto-detected from input pattern
+8. **Parse Flags**: Extract `--use-codex` and `--cli-execute` flags for Phase 4
+9. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+10. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
+
+### 5-Phase Execution
+
+#### Phase 1: Create Test Session
+
+**Command**:
+- **Session Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]\"")`
+- **Prompt Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:session:start --new \"Test generation for: [description]\"")`
+
+**Input**: User argument (session ID, description, or file path)
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Creates new session: `WFS-test-[slug]`
+- Writes `workflow-session.json` metadata:
+  - **Session Mode**: Includes `workflow_type: "test_session"`, `source_session_id: "[sourceId]"`
+  - **Prompt Mode**: Includes `workflow_type: "test_session"` only
+- Returns new session ID
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: `testSessionId` (pattern: `WFS-test-[slug]`)
+
+**Validation**:
+- **Session Mode**: Source session exists with completed IMPL tasks
+- **Both Modes**: New test session directory created with metadata
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
+
+**Command**:
+- **Session Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
+- **Prompt Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [testSessionId] \"[task_description]\"")`
+
+**Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- **Session Mode**:
+  - Load source session implementation context and summaries
+  - Analyze test coverage using MCP tools
+  - Identify files requiring tests
+- **Prompt Mode**:
+  - Analyze codebase based on description
+  - Identify relevant files and dependencies
+- Detect test framework and conventions
+- Generate context package JSON
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: `contextPath` (pattern: `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/[test-]context-package.json`)
+
+**Validation**:
+- Context package created with coverage analysis
+- Test framework detected
+- Test conventions documented
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
+
+**Command**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `contextPath` from Phase 2
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Use Gemini to analyze coverage gaps and implementation
+- Study existing test patterns and conventions
+- Generate **multi-layered test requirements** (L0: Static Analysis, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+- Design test generation strategy with quality assurance criteria
+- Generate `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` with structured test layers
+
+**Enhanced Test Requirements**:
+For each targeted file/function, Gemini MUST generate:
+1. **L0: Static Analysis Requirements**:
+   - Linting rules to enforce (ESLint, Prettier)
+   - Type checking requirements (TypeScript)
+   - Anti-pattern detection rules
+2. **L1: Unit Test Requirements**:
+   - Happy path scenarios (valid inputs → expected outputs)
+   - Negative path scenarios (invalid inputs → error handling)
+   - Edge cases (null, undefined, 0, empty strings/arrays)
+3. **L2: Integration Test Requirements**:
+   - Successful component interactions
+   - Failure handling scenarios (service unavailable, timeout)
+4. **L3: E2E Test Requirements** (if applicable):
+   - Key user journeys from start to finish
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` created
+
+**Validation**:
+- TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md exists with complete sections:
+  - Coverage Assessment
+  - Test Framework & Conventions
+  - **Multi-Layered Test Plan** (NEW):
+    - L0: Static Analysis Plan
+    - L1: Unit Test Plan
+    - L2: Integration Test Plan
+    - L3: E2E Test Plan (if applicable)
+  - Test Requirements by File (with layer annotations)
+  - Test Generation Strategy
+  - Implementation Targets
+  - Quality Assurance Criteria (NEW):
+    - Minimum coverage thresholds
+    - Required test types per function
+    - Acceptance criteria for test quality
+  - Success Criteria
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
+
+**Command**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `--use-codex` flag (if present) - Controls IMPL-002 fix mode
+- `--cli-execute` flag (if present) - Controls IMPL-001 generation mode
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3 (multi-layered test plan)
+- Generate **minimum 3 task JSON files** (expandable based on complexity):
+  - **IMPL-001.json**: Test Understanding & Generation (`@code-developer`)
+  - **IMPL-001.5-review.json**: Test Quality Gate (`@test-fix-agent`) ← **NEW**
+  - **IMPL-002.json**: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (`@test-fix-agent`)
+  - **IMPL-003+**: Additional tasks if needed for complex projects
+- Generate `IMPL_PLAN.md` with multi-layered test strategy
+- Generate `TODO_LIST.md` with task checklist
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.json` exists
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.5-review.json` exists ← **NEW**
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-002.json` exists
+- Verify additional `.task/IMPL-*.json` if applicable
+- Verify `IMPL_PLAN.md` and `TODO_LIST.md` created
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed, phase 5 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 5: Return Summary
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+Independent test-fix workflow created successfully!
+
+Input: [original input]
+Mode: [Session|Prompt]
+Test Session: [testSessionId]
+
+Tasks Created:
+- IMPL-001: Test Understanding & Generation (@code-developer)
+- IMPL-001.5: Test Quality Gate - Static Analysis & Coverage (@test-fix-agent) ← NEW
+- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
+[- IMPL-003+: Additional tasks if applicable]
+
+Test Strategy: Multi-Layered (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+Test Framework: [detected framework]
+Test Files to Generate: [count]
+Quality Thresholds:
+- Minimum Coverage: 80%
+- Static Analysis: Zero critical issues
+Max Fix Iterations: 5
+Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated]
+
+Review artifacts:
+- Test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+- Task list: .workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
+
+CRITICAL - Next Steps:
+1. Review IMPL_PLAN.md (now includes multi-layered test strategy)
+2. **MUST execute: /workflow:test-cycle-execute**
+   - This command only generated task JSON files
+   - Test execution and fix iterations happen in test-cycle-execute
+   - Do NOT attempt to run tests or fixes in main workflow
+3. IMPL-001.5 will validate test quality before fix cycle begins
+```
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
+
+**BOUNDARY NOTE**:
+- Command completes here - only task JSON files generated
+- All test execution, failure detection, CLI analysis, fix generation happens in `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`
+- This command does NOT handle test failures or apply fixes
+
+---
+
+### TodoWrite Pattern
+
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for test-fix-gen workflow with dual-mode support (Session Mode and Prompt Mode).
+
+#### Key Principles
+
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` (Session Mode) or `/workflow:tools:context-gather` (Prompt Mode) attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 2.1-2.3 collapse to "Gather test coverage context: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED with mode-specific context gathering) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+#### Test-Fix-Gen Specific Features
+
+- **Dual-Mode Support**: Automatic mode detection based on input pattern
+  - **Session Mode**: Input pattern `WFS-*` → uses `test-context-gather` for cross-session context
+  - **Prompt Mode**: Text or file path → uses `context-gather` for direct codebase analysis
+- **Phase 2**: Mode-specific context gathering (session summaries vs codebase analysis)
+- **Phase 3**: Multi-layered test requirements analysis (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+- **Phase 4**: Multi-task generation with quality gate (IMPL-001, IMPL-001.5-review, IMPL-002)
+- **Fix Mode Configuration**: `--use-codex` flag controls IMPL-002 fix mode (manual vs automated)
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
+- Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
+- Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
+- Dual-mode support: Both Session Mode and Prompt Mode use same attachment pattern
+- Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
+
+**Note**: Unlike other workflow orchestrators, this file consolidates TodoWrite examples in this section rather than distributing them across Phase descriptions for better dual-mode clarity.
+
+---
+
+## Task Specifications
+
+Generates minimum 3 tasks (expandable for complex projects):
+
+### IMPL-001: Test Understanding & Generation
+
+**Agent**: `@code-developer`
+
+**Purpose**: Understand source implementation and generate test files following multi-layered test strategy
+
+**Task Configuration**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-001`
+- `meta.type: "test-gen"`
+- `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+- `context.requirements`: Understand source implementation and generate tests across all layers (L0-L3)
+- `flow_control.target_files`: Test files to create from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. **Understand Phase**:
+   - Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and test context
+   - Understand source code implementation patterns
+   - Analyze multi-layered test requirements (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+   - Identify test scenarios, edge cases, and error paths
+2. **Generation Phase**:
+   - Generate L1 unit test files following existing patterns
+   - Generate L2 integration test files (if applicable)
+   - Generate L3 E2E test files (if applicable)
+   - Ensure test coverage aligns with multi-layered requirements
+   - Include both positive and negative test cases
+3. **Verification Phase**:
+   - Verify test completeness and correctness
+   - Ensure each test has meaningful assertions
+   - Check for test anti-patterns (tests without assertions, overly broad mocks)
+
+### IMPL-001.5: Test Quality Gate ← **NEW**
+
+**Agent**: `@test-fix-agent`
+
+**Purpose**: Validate test quality before entering fix cycle - prevent "hollow tests" from becoming the source of truth
+
+**Task Configuration**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-001.5-review`
+- `meta.type: "test-quality-review"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `context.requirements`: Validate generated tests meet quality standards
+- `context.quality_config`: Load from `.claude/workflows/test-quality-config.json`
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. **L0: Static Analysis**:
+   - Run linting on test files (ESLint, Prettier)
+   - Check for test anti-patterns:
+     - Tests without assertions (`expect()` missing)
+     - Empty test bodies (`it('should...', () => {})`)
+     - Disabled tests without justification (`it.skip`, `xit`)
+   - Verify TypeScript type safety (if applicable)
+2. **Coverage Analysis**:
+   - Run coverage analysis on generated tests
+   - Calculate coverage percentage for target source files
+   - Identify uncovered branches and edge cases
+3. **Test Quality Metrics**:
+   - Verify minimum coverage threshold met (default: 80%)
+   - Verify all critical functions have negative test cases
+   - Verify integration tests cover key component interactions
+4. **Quality Gate Decision**:
+   - **PASS**: Coverage ≥ 80%, zero critical anti-patterns → Proceed to IMPL-002
+   - **FAIL**: Coverage < 80% OR critical anti-patterns found → Loop back to IMPL-001 with feedback
+
+**Acceptance Criteria**:
+- Static analysis: Zero critical issues
+- Test coverage: ≥ 80% for target files
+- Test completeness: All targeted functions have unit tests
+- Negative test coverage: Each public API has at least one error handling test
+- Integration coverage: Key component interactions have integration tests (if applicable)
+
+**Failure Handling**:
+If quality gate fails:
+1. Generate detailed feedback report (`.process/test-quality-report.md`)
+2. Update IMPL-001 task with specific improvement requirements
+3. Trigger IMPL-001 re-execution with enhanced context
+4. Maximum 2 quality gate retries before escalating to user
+
+### IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle
+
+**Agent**: `@test-fix-agent`
+
+**Purpose**: Execute initial tests and trigger orchestrator-managed fix cycles
+
+**Note**: This task executes tests and reports results. The test-cycle-execute orchestrator manages all fix iterations, CLI analysis, and fix task generation.
+
+**Task Configuration**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-002`
+- `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `meta.use_codex: true|false` (based on `--use-codex` flag)
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
+
+**Test-Fix Cycle Specification**:
+**Note**: This specification describes what test-cycle-execute orchestrator will do. The agent only executes single tasks.
+- **Cycle Pattern** (orchestrator-managed): test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex) → retest
+- **Tools Configuration** (orchestrator-controlled):
+  - Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
+  - Manual fix application (default) OR Codex if `--use-codex` flag (resume mechanism)
+- **Exit Conditions** (orchestrator-enforced):
+  - Success: All tests pass
+  - Failure: Max iterations reached (5)
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. **Phase 1**: Initial test execution
+2. **Phase 2**: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes
+3. **Phase 3**: Final validation and certification
+
+### IMPL-003+: Additional Tasks (Optional)
+
+**Scenarios for Multiple Tasks**:
+- Large projects requiring per-module test generation
+- Separate integration vs unit test tasks
+- Specialized test types (performance, security, etc.)
+
+**Agent**: `@code-developer` or specialized agents based on requirements
+
+---
+
+## Artifacts & Output
+
+### Output Files Structure
+
+Created in `.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/`:
+
+```
+WFS-test-[session]/
+├── workflow-session.json          # Session metadata
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                   # Test generation and execution strategy
+├── TODO_LIST.md                   # Task checklist
+├── .task/
+│   ├── IMPL-001.json              # Test understanding & generation
+│   ├── IMPL-002.json              # Test execution & fix cycle
+│   └── IMPL-*.json                # Additional tasks (if applicable)
+└── .process/
+    ├── [test-]context-package.json # Context and coverage analysis
+    └── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md    # Test requirements and strategy
+```
+
+### Session Metadata
+
+**File**: `workflow-session.json`
+
+**Session Mode** includes:
+- `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+- `source_session_id: "[sourceSessionId]"` (enables automatic cross-session context)
+
+**Prompt Mode** includes:
+- `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+- No `source_session_id` field
+
+### Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+Test-Fix-Gen Workflow Orchestrator (Dual-Mode Support)
+│
+├─ Phase 1: Create Test Session
+│  ├─ Session Mode: /workflow:session:start --new (with source_session_id)
+│  └─ Prompt Mode: /workflow:session:start --new (without source_session_id)
+│     └─ Returns: testSessionId (WFS-test-[slug])
+│
+├─ Phase 2: Gather Context                                   ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  ├─ Session Mode: /workflow:tools:test-context-gather
+│  │  └─ Load source session summaries + analyze coverage
+│  └─ Prompt Mode: /workflow:tools:context-gather
+│     └─ Analyze codebase from description
+│     ├─ Phase 2.1: Load context and analyze coverage
+│     ├─ Phase 2.2: Detect test framework and conventions
+│     └─ Phase 2.3: Generate context package
+│     └─ Returns: [test-]context-package.json                ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis                         ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced
+│     ├─ Phase 3.1: Analyze coverage gaps with Gemini
+│     ├─ Phase 3.2: Study existing test patterns
+│     └─ Phase 3.3: Generate test generation strategy
+│     └─ Returns: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md                   ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks                              ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-task-generate
+│     ├─ Phase 4.1: Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+│     ├─ Phase 4.2: Generate task JSONs (IMPL-001, IMPL-002)
+│     └─ Phase 4.3: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
+│     └─ Returns: Task JSONs and plans                       ← COLLAPSED
+│
+└─ Phase 5: Return Summary
+   └─ Command ends, control returns to user
+
+Artifacts Created:
+├── .workflow/WFS-test-[session]/
+│   ├── workflow-session.json
+│   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+│   ├── TODO_LIST.md
+│   ├── .task/
+│   │   ├── IMPL-001.json (test understanding & generation)
+│   │   ├── IMPL-002.json (test execution & fix cycle)
+│   │   └── IMPL-003.json (optional: test review & certification)
+│   └── .process/
+│       ├── [test-]context-package.json
+│       └── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Key Points:
+• ← ATTACHED: SlashCommand attaches sub-tasks to orchestrator TodoWrite
+• ← COLLAPSED: Sub-tasks executed and collapsed to phase summary
+• Dual-Mode: Session Mode and Prompt Mode share same attachment pattern
+• Command Boundary: Execution delegated to /workflow:test-cycle-execute
+```
+
+---
+
+## Reference
+
+### Error Handling
+
+| Phase | Error Condition | Action |
+|-------|----------------|--------|
+| 1 | Source session not found (session mode) | Return error with source session ID |
+| 1 | No completed IMPL tasks (session mode) | Return error, source incomplete |
+| 2 | Context gathering failed | Return error, check source artifacts |
+| 3 | Gemini analysis failed | Return error, check context package |
+| 4 | Task generation failed | Retry once, then return error with details |
+
+### Best Practices
+
+1. **Before Running**:
+   - Ensure implementation is complete (session mode: check summaries exist)
+   - Commit all implementation changes
+   - Review source code quality
+
+2. **After Running**:
+   - Review generated `IMPL_PLAN.md` before execution
+   - Check `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` for completeness
+   - Verify task dependencies in `TODO_LIST.md`
+
+3. **During Execution**:
+   - Monitor iteration logs in `.process/fix-iteration-*`
+   - Track progress with `/workflow:status`
+   - Review Gemini diagnostic outputs
+
+4. **Mode Selection**:
+   - Use **Session Mode** for completed workflow validation
+   - Use **Prompt Mode** for ad-hoc test generation
+   - Use `--use-codex` for autonomous fix application
+   - Use `--cli-execute` for enhanced generation capabilities
+
+## Related Commands
+
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- `/workflow:plan` or `/workflow:execute` - Complete implementation session (for Session Mode)
+- None for Prompt Mode (ad-hoc test generation)
+
+**Called by This Command** (5 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create independent test workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (Session Mode): Gather source session context
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2 (Prompt Mode): Analyze codebase directly
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3: Generate test requirements using Gemini
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs using action-planning-agent (autonomous, default)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex` - Phase 4: With automated Codex fixes for IMPL-002 (when `--use-codex` flag used)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute` - Phase 4: With CLI execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation (when `--cli-execute` flag used)
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:status` - Review generated test tasks
+- `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` - Execute test generation and iterative fix cycles
+- `/workflow:execute` - Standard execution of generated test tasks
+

.claude/commands/workflow/test-gen.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: test-gen
-description: Create independent test-fix workflow session by analyzing completed implementation
+description: Create independent test-fix workflow session from completed implementation session, analyzes code to generate test tasks
 argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] source-session-id"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
@@ -18,22 +18,40 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - **Parameter Simplification**: Tools auto-detect test session type via metadata, no manual cross-session parameters needed
 - **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` flag for automated Codex fix application
 
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
+
 **Execution Flow**:
 1. Initialize TodoWrite → Create test session → Parse session ID
 2. Gather cross-session context (automatic) → Parse context path
 3. Analyze implementation with concept-enhanced → Parse ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
 4. Generate test task from analysis → Return summary
 
+**Command Scope**: This command ONLY prepares test workflow artifacts. It does NOT execute tests or implementation. Task execution requires separate user action.
+
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 test session creation
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files or analyze before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase for next phase
 4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 4 completes (execution triggered separately)
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 5 completes (summary returned)
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 7. **Automatic Detection**: context-gather auto-detects test session and gathers source session context
 8. **Parse --use-codex Flag**: Extract flag from arguments and pass to Phase 4 (test-task-generate)
+9. **Command Boundary**: This command ends at Phase 5 summary. Test execution is NOT part of this command.
+10. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+11. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
 ## 5-Phase Execution
 
@@ -86,7 +104,39 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - Test framework detected
 - Test conventions documented
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather invoked, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Load source session summaries (test-context-gather)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading source session summaries"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Analyze test coverage with MCP tools (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test coverage"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.3: Identify coverage gaps and framework (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.1-2.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 2 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 2.1-2.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
 ---
 
@@ -118,7 +168,39 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
   - Implementation Targets (test files to create)
   - Success Criteria
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-concept-enhanced invoked, INSERT 3 concept-enhanced tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Analyze coverage gaps with Gemini (test-concept-enhanced)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Study existing test patterns (test-concept-enhanced)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Studying test patterns"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Generate test generation strategy (test-concept-enhanced)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test strategy"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-concept-enhanced's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
 ---
 
@@ -170,70 +252,165 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
   - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes (based on flag)
   - Phase 3: Final validation and certification
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed, phase 5 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-task-generate invoked, INSERT 3 test-task-generate tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.1: Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (test-task-generate)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Parsing test analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.2: Generate IMPL-001.json and IMPL-002.json (test-task-generate)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating task JSONs"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.3: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md (test-task-generate)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating plan documents"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-task-generate's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 4.1-4.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 4 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 4.1-4.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 4 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 5: Return Summary to User
+### Phase 5: Return Summary (Command Ends Here)
+
+**Important**: This is the final phase of `/workflow:test-gen`. The command completes and returns control to the user. No automatic execution occurs.
 
 **Return to User**:
 ```
-Independent test-fix workflow created successfully!
+Test workflow preparation complete!
 
 Source Session: [sourceSessionId]
 Test Session: [testSessionId]
 
-Tasks Created:
-- IMPL-001: Test Generation (@code-developer)
-- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
+Artifacts Created:
+- Test context analysis
+- Test generation strategy
+- Task definitions (IMPL-001, IMPL-002)
+- Implementation plan
 
 Test Framework: [detected framework]
 Test Files to Generate: [count]
-Max Fix Iterations: 5
 Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated] (based on --use-codex flag)
 
-Next Steps:
-1. Review test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
-2. Execute workflow: /workflow:execute
-3. Monitor progress: /workflow:status
+Review Generated Artifacts:
+- Test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+- Task list: .workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
+- Analysis: .workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Ready for execution. Use appropriate workflow commands to proceed.
 ```
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
 
+**Command Boundary**: After this phase, the command terminates and returns to user prompt.
+
 ---
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-Track progress through 5 phases:
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for test-gen workflow with cross-session context gathering and test generation strategy.
 
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
-  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
-  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
-]})
-```
+### Key Principles
 
-Update status to `in_progress` when starting each phase, mark `completed` when done.
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
 
-## Data Flow
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 2.1-2.3 collapse to "Gather test coverage context: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+### Test-Gen Specific Features
+
+- **Phase 2**: Cross-session context gathering from source implementation session
+- **Phase 3**: Test requirements analysis with Gemini for generation strategy
+- **Phase 4**: Dual-task generation (IMPL-001 for test generation, IMPL-002 for test execution)
+- **Fix Mode Configuration**: `--use-codex` flag controls IMPL-002 fix mode (manual vs automated)
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
+- Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
+- Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
+- Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 2, 3, 4) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
+
+## Execution Flow Diagram
 
 ```
-/workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
-  ↓
-Phase 1: session-start → WFS-test-user-auth
-  ↓
-Phase 2: test-context-gather → test-context-package.json
-  ↓
-Phase 3: test-concept-enhanced → TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-  ↓
-Phase 4: test-task-generate → IMPL-001.json + IMPL-002.json
-  ↓
-Phase 5: Return summary
-  ↓
-/workflow:execute → IMPL-001 (@code-developer) → IMPL-002 (@test-fix-agent)
+Test-Gen Workflow Orchestrator
+│
+├─ Phase 1: Create Test Session
+│  └─ /workflow:session:start --new
+│     └─ Returns: testSessionId (WFS-test-[source])
+│
+├─ Phase 2: Gather Test Context                           ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-context-gather
+│     ├─ Phase 2.1: Load source session summaries
+│     ├─ Phase 2.2: Analyze test coverage with MCP tools
+│     └─ Phase 2.3: Identify coverage gaps and framework
+│     └─ Returns: test-context-package.json               ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis                      ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced
+│     ├─ Phase 3.1: Analyze coverage gaps with Gemini
+│     ├─ Phase 3.2: Study existing test patterns
+│     └─ Phase 3.3: Generate test generation strategy
+│     └─ Returns: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md                ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks                           ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-task-generate
+│     ├─ Phase 4.1: Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+│     ├─ Phase 4.2: Generate IMPL-001.json and IMPL-002.json
+│     └─ Phase 4.3: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
+│     └─ Returns: Task JSONs and plans                    ← COLLAPSED
+│
+└─ Phase 5: Return Summary
+   └─ Command ends, control returns to user
+
+Artifacts Created:
+├── .workflow/WFS-test-[session]/
+│   ├── workflow-session.json
+│   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+│   ├── TODO_LIST.md
+│   ├── .task/
+│   │   ├── IMPL-001.json (test generation task)
+│   │   └── IMPL-002.json (test execution task)
+│   └── .process/
+│       ├── test-context-package.json
+│       └── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Key Points:
+• ← ATTACHED: SlashCommand attaches sub-tasks to orchestrator TodoWrite
+• ← COLLAPSED: Sub-tasks executed and collapsed to phase summary
 ```
 
 ## Session Metadata
@@ -242,9 +419,16 @@ Test session includes `workflow_type: "test_session"` and `source_session_id` fo
 
 ## Task Output
 
-Generates two tasks:
-- **IMPL-001** (@code-developer): Test generation from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- **IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent): Test execution with iterative fix cycle (max 5 iterations)
+Generates two task definition files:
+- **IMPL-001.json**: Test generation task specification
+  - Agent: @code-developer
+  - Input: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+  - Output: Test files based on analysis
+- **IMPL-002.json**: Test execution and fix cycle specification
+  - Agent: @test-fix-agent
+  - Dependency: IMPL-001 must complete first
+  - Max iterations: 5
+  - Fix mode: Manual or Codex (based on --use-codex flag)
 
 See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete task JSON schemas.
 
@@ -269,33 +453,49 @@ Created in `.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/`:
 - `IMPL_PLAN.md` - Test plan
 - `TODO_LIST.md` - Task checklist
 
-## Agent Execution
+## Task Specifications
 
-**IMPL-001** (@code-developer):
-- Generates test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- Follows existing test patterns and conventions
+**IMPL-001.json Structure**:
+- `meta.type: "test-gen"`
+- `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+- `context.requirements`: Generate tests based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- `flow_control.target_files`: Test files to create
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach`: Test generation strategy
 
-**IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent):
-1. Run test suite
-2. Iterative fix cycle (max 5):
-   - Gemini diagnosis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
-   - Manual fix application (default) OR Codex applies fixes if --use-codex flag (resume mechanism)
-   - Retest and check regressions
-3. Final validation and certification
+**IMPL-002.json Structure**:
+- `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `meta.use_codex`: true/false (based on --use-codex flag)
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
+  - Gemini diagnosis template
+  - Fix application mode (manual/codex)
+  - Max iterations: 5
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase flow
 
-See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for detailed specifications.
+See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete JSON schemas.
 
 ## Best Practices
 
-1. Run after implementation complete (ensure source session has summaries)
-2. Commit implementation changes before test-gen
-3. Monitor execution with `/workflow:status`
-4. Review iteration logs in `.process/fix-iteration-*`
+1. **Prerequisites**: Ensure source session has completed IMPL tasks with summaries
+2. **Clean State**: Commit implementation changes before running test-gen
+3. **Review Artifacts**: Check generated IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md before proceeding
+4. **Understand Scope**: This command only prepares artifacts; it does not execute tests
 
 ## Related Commands
 
-- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (coverage analysis)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3 (Gemini test analysis)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4 (task generation)
-- `/workflow:execute` - Execute workflow
-- `/workflow:status` - Check progress
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- `/workflow:plan` or `/workflow:execute` - Complete implementation session that needs test validation
+
+**Called by This Command** (5 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create independent test workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2: Analyze test coverage and gather source session context
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3: Generate test requirements and strategy using Gemini
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs using action-planning-agent (autonomous, default)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex` - Phase 4: With automated Codex fixes for IMPL-002 (when `--use-codex` flag used)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute` - Phase 4: With CLI execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation (when `--cli-execute` flag used)
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:status` - Review generated test tasks
+- `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` - Execute test generation and fix cycles
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute generated test tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/concept-enhanced.md

@@ -1,532 +0,0 @@
----
-name: concept-enhanced
-description: Enhanced intelligent analysis with parallel CLI execution and design blueprint generation
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --context path/to/context-package.json"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session WFS-auth --context .workflow/WFS-auth/.process/context-package.json
-  - /workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session WFS-payment --context .workflow/WFS-payment/.process/context-package.json
----
-
-# Enhanced Analysis Command (/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced)
-
-## Overview
-Advanced solution design and feasibility analysis engine with parallel CLI execution that processes standardized context packages and produces comprehensive technical analysis focused on solution improvements, key design decisions, and critical insights.
-
-**Analysis Focus**: Produces ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with solution design, architectural rationale, feasibility assessment, and optimization strategies. Does NOT generate task breakdowns or implementation plans.
-
-**Independent Usage**: This command can be called directly by users or as part of the `/workflow:plan` command. It accepts context packages and provides solution-focused technical analysis.
-
-## Core Philosophy
-- **Solution-Focused**: Emphasize design decisions, architectural rationale, and critical insights
-- **Context-Driven**: Precise analysis based on comprehensive context packages
-- **Intelligent Tool Selection**: Choose optimal tools based on task complexity (Gemini for design, Codex for validation)
-- **Parallel Execution**: Execute multiple CLI tools simultaneously for efficiency
-- **No Task Planning**: Exclude implementation steps, task breakdowns, and project planning
-- **Single Output**: Generate only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with technical analysis
-
-## Core Responsibilities
-- **Context Package Parsing**: Read and validate context-package.json
-- **Parallel CLI Orchestration**: Execute Gemini (solution design) and optionally Codex (feasibility validation)
-- **Solution Design Analysis**: Evaluate architecture, identify key design decisions with rationale
-- **Feasibility Assessment**: Analyze technical complexity, risks, and implementation readiness
-- **Optimization Recommendations**: Propose performance, security, and code quality improvements
-- **Perspective Synthesis**: Integrate Gemini and Codex insights into unified solution assessment
-- **Technical Analysis Report**: Generate ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focused on design decisions and critical insights (NO task planning)
-
-## Analysis Strategy Selection
-
-### Tool Selection by Task Complexity
-
-**Simple Tasks (≤3 modules)**:
-- **Primary Tool**: Gemini (rapid understanding and pattern recognition)
-- **Support Tool**: Code-index (structural analysis)
-- **Execution Mode**: Single-round analysis, focus on existing patterns
-
-**Medium Tasks (4-6 modules)**:
-- **Primary Tool**: Gemini (comprehensive single-round analysis and architecture design)
-- **Support Tools**: Code-index + Exa (external best practices)
-- **Execution Mode**: Single comprehensive analysis covering understanding + architecture design
-
-**Complex Tasks (>6 modules)**:
-- **Primary Tools**: Gemini (single comprehensive analysis) + Codex (implementation validation)
-- **Analysis Strategy**: Gemini handles understanding + architecture in one round, Codex validates implementation
-- **Execution Mode**: Parallel execution - Gemini comprehensive analysis + Codex validation
-
-### Tool Preferences by Tech Stack
-
-```json
-{
-  "frontend": {
-    "primary": "gemini",
-    "secondary": "codex",
-    "focus": ["component_design", "state_management", "ui_patterns"]
-  },
-  "backend": {
-    "primary": "codex",
-    "secondary": "gemini",
-    "focus": ["api_design", "data_flow", "security", "performance"]
-  },
-  "fullstack": {
-    "primary": "gemini",
-    "secondary": "codex",
-    "focus": ["system_architecture", "integration", "data_consistency"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-## Execution Lifecycle
-
-### Phase 1: Validation & Preparation
-1. **Session Validation**
-   - Verify session directory exists: `.workflow/{session_id}/`
-   - Load session metadata from `workflow-session.json`
-   - Validate session state and task context
-
-2. **Context Package Validation**
-   - Verify context package exists at specified path
-   - Validate JSON format and structure
-   - Assess context package size and complexity
-
-3. **Task Analysis & Classification**
-   - Parse task description and extract keywords
-   - Identify technical domain and complexity level
-   - Determine required analysis depth and scope
-   - Load existing session context and task summaries
-
-4. **Tool Selection Strategy**
-   - **Simple/Medium Tasks**: Single Gemini comprehensive analysis
-   - **Complex Tasks**: Gemini comprehensive + Codex validation
-   - Load appropriate prompt templates and configurations
-
-### Phase 2: Analysis Preparation
-1. **Workspace Setup**
-   - Create analysis output directory: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/`
-   - Initialize log files and monitoring structures
-   - Set process limits and resource management
-
-2. **Context Optimization**
-   - Filter high-priority assets from context package
-   - Organize project structure and dependencies
-   - Prepare template references and rule configurations
-
-3. **Execution Environment**
-   - Configure CLI tools with write permissions
-   - Set timeout parameters and monitoring intervals
-   - Prepare error handling and recovery mechanisms
-
-### Phase 3: Parallel Analysis Execution
-1. **Gemini Solution Design & Architecture Analysis**
-   - **Tool Configuration**:
-     ```bash
-     ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-     PURPOSE: Analyze and design optimal solution for {task_description}
-     TASK: Evaluate current architecture, propose solution design, and identify key design decisions
-     CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
-
-     **MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json to understand:
-     - Task requirements from metadata.task_description
-     - Relevant source files from assets[] array
-     - Tech stack from tech_stack section
-     - Project structure from statistics section
-
-     **ANALYSIS PRIORITY - Use ALL source documents from context-package assets[]**:
-     1. PRIMARY SOURCES (Highest Priority): Individual role analysis.md files (system-architect, ui-designer, product-manager, etc.)
-        - These contain complete technical details, design rationale, ADRs, and decision context
-        - Extract: Technical specs, API schemas, design tokens, caching configs, performance metrics
-     2. SYNTHESIS REFERENCE (Medium Priority): synthesis-specification.md
-        - Use for integrated requirements and cross-role alignment
-        - Validate decisions and identify integration points
-     3. TOPIC FRAMEWORK (Low Priority): topic-framework.md for discussion context
-
-     EXPECTED:
-     1. CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS: Existing patterns, code structure, integration points, technical debt
-     2. SOLUTION DESIGN: Core architecture principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale
-     3. CRITICAL INSIGHTS: What works well, identified gaps, technical risks, architectural tradeoffs
-     4. OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES: Performance improvements, security enhancements, code quality recommendations
-     5. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Complexity analysis, compatibility evaluation, implementation readiness
-     6. **OUTPUT FILE**: Write complete analysis to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
-
-     RULES:
-     - Focus on SOLUTION IMPROVEMENTS and KEY DESIGN DECISIONS, NOT task planning
-     - Provide architectural rationale, evaluate alternatives, assess tradeoffs
-     - **CRITICAL**: Identify code targets - existing files as "file:function:lines", new files as "file"
-     - For modifications: specify exact files/functions/line ranges
-     - For new files: specify file path only (no function or lines)
-     - Do NOT create task lists, implementation steps, or code examples
-     - Do NOT generate any code snippets or implementation details
-     - **MUST write output to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md**
-     - Output ONLY architectural analysis and design recommendations
-     " --approval-mode yolo
-     ```
-   - **Output Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
-
-2. **Codex Technical Feasibility Validation** (Complex Tasks Only)
-   - **Tool Configuration**:
-     ```bash
-     codex --full-auto exec "
-     PURPOSE: Validate technical feasibility and identify implementation risks for {task_description}
-     TASK: Assess implementation complexity, validate technology choices, evaluate performance and security implications
-     CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json,.workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md,.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json,CLAUDE.md}
-
-     **MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze:
-     - .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json for task context
-     - .workflow/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md for proposed solution design
-     - Relevant source files listed in context-package.json assets[]
-
-     EXPECTED:
-     1. FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT: Technical complexity rating, resource requirements, technology compatibility
-     2. RISK ANALYSIS: Implementation risks, integration challenges, performance concerns, security vulnerabilities
-     3. TECHNICAL VALIDATION: Development approach validation, quality standards assessment, maintenance implications
-     4. CRITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Must-have requirements, optimization opportunities, security controls
-     5. **OUTPUT FILE**: Write validation results to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
-
-     RULES:
-     - Focus on TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY and RISK ASSESSMENT, NOT implementation planning
-     - Validate architectural decisions, identify potential issues, recommend optimizations
-     - **CRITICAL**: Verify code targets - existing files "file:function:lines", new files "file"
-     - Confirm exact locations for modifications, identify additional new files if needed
-     - Do NOT create task breakdowns, step-by-step guides, or code examples
-     - Do NOT generate any code snippets or implementation details
-     - **MUST write output to .workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md**
-     - Output ONLY feasibility analysis and risk assessment
-     " --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-     ```
-   - **Output Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
-
-3. **Parallel Execution Management**
-   - Launch both tools simultaneously for complex tasks
-   - Monitor execution progress with timeout controls
-   - Handle process completion and error scenarios
-   - Maintain execution logs for debugging and recovery
-
-### Phase 4: Results Collection & Synthesis
-1. **Output Validation & Collection**
-   - **Gemini Results**: Validate `gemini-solution-design.md` contains complete solution analysis
-   - **Codex Results**: For complex tasks, validate `codex-feasibility-validation.md` with technical assessment
-   - **Fallback Processing**: Use execution logs if primary outputs are incomplete
-   - **Status Classification**: Mark each tool as completed, partial, failed, or skipped
-
-2. **Quality Assessment**
-   - **Design Quality**: Verify architectural decisions have clear rationale and alternatives analysis
-   - **Insight Depth**: Assess quality of critical insights and risk identification
-   - **Feasibility Rigor**: Validate completeness of technical feasibility assessment
-   - **Optimization Value**: Check actionability of optimization recommendations
-
-3. **Analysis Synthesis Strategy**
-   - **Simple/Medium Tasks**: Direct integration of Gemini solution design
-   - **Complex Tasks**: Synthesis of Gemini design with Codex feasibility validation
-   - **Conflict Resolution**: Identify architectural disagreements and provide balanced resolution
-   - **Confidence Scoring**: Assess overall solution confidence based on multi-tool consensus
-
-### Phase 5: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Generation
-1. **Structured Report Assembly**
-   - **Executive Summary**: Analysis focus, overall assessment, recommendation status
-   - **Current State Analysis**: Architecture overview, compatibility, critical findings
-   - **Proposed Solution Design**: Core principles, system design, key design decisions with rationale
-   - **Implementation Strategy**: Development approach, feasibility assessment, risk mitigation
-   - **Solution Optimization**: Performance, security, code quality recommendations
-   - **Critical Success Factors**: Technical requirements, quality metrics, success validation
-   - **Confidence & Recommendations**: Assessment scores, final recommendation with rationale
-
-2. **Report Generation Guidelines**
-   - **Focus**: Solution improvements, key design decisions, critical insights
-   - **Exclude**: Task breakdowns, implementation steps, project planning
-   - **Emphasize**: Architectural rationale, tradeoff analysis, risk assessment
-   - **Structure**: Clear sections with decision justification and feasibility scoring
-
-3. **Final Output**
-   - **Primary Output**: `ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - comprehensive solution design and technical analysis
-   - **Single File Policy**: Only generate ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md, no supplementary files
-   - **Report Location**: `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
-   - **Content Focus**: Technical insights, design decisions, optimization strategies
-
-## Analysis Results Format
-
-Generated ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md focuses on **solution improvements, key design decisions, and critical insights** (NOT task planning):
-
-```markdown
-# Technical Analysis & Solution Design
-
-## Executive Summary
-- **Analysis Focus**: {core_problem_or_improvement_area}
-- **Analysis Timestamp**: {timestamp}
-- **Tools Used**: {analysis_tools}
-- **Overall Assessment**: {feasibility_score}/5 - {recommendation_status}
-
----
-
-## 1. Current State Analysis
-
-### Architecture Overview
-- **Existing Patterns**: {key_architectural_patterns}
-- **Code Structure**: {current_codebase_organization}
-- **Integration Points**: {system_integration_touchpoints}
-- **Technical Debt Areas**: {identified_debt_with_impact}
-
-### Compatibility & Dependencies
-- **Framework Alignment**: {framework_compatibility_assessment}
-- **Dependency Analysis**: {critical_dependencies_and_risks}
-- **Migration Considerations**: {backward_compatibility_concerns}
-
-### Critical Findings
-- **Strengths**: {what_works_well}
-- **Gaps**: {missing_capabilities_or_issues}
-- **Risks**: {identified_technical_and_business_risks}
-
----
-
-## 2. Proposed Solution Design
-
-### Core Architecture Principles
-- **Design Philosophy**: {key_design_principles}
-- **Architectural Approach**: {chosen_architectural_pattern_with_rationale}
-- **Scalability Strategy**: {how_solution_scales}
-
-### System Design
-- **Component Architecture**: {high_level_component_design}
-- **Data Flow**: {data_flow_patterns_and_state_management}
-- **API Design**: {interface_contracts_and_specifications}
-- **Integration Strategy**: {how_components_integrate}
-
-### Key Design Decisions
-1. **Decision**: {critical_design_choice}
-   - **Rationale**: {why_this_approach}
-   - **Alternatives Considered**: {other_options_and_tradeoffs}
-   - **Impact**: {implications_on_architecture}
-
-2. **Decision**: {another_critical_choice}
-   - **Rationale**: {reasoning}
-   - **Alternatives Considered**: {tradeoffs}
-   - **Impact**: {consequences}
-
-### Technical Specifications
-- **Technology Stack**: {chosen_technologies_with_justification}
-- **Code Organization**: {module_structure_and_patterns}
-- **Testing Strategy**: {testing_approach_and_coverage}
-- **Performance Targets**: {performance_requirements_and_benchmarks}
-
----
-
-## 3. Implementation Strategy
-
-### Development Approach
-- **Core Implementation Pattern**: {primary_implementation_strategy}
-- **Module Dependencies**: {dependency_graph_and_order}
-- **Quality Assurance**: {qa_approach_and_validation}
-
-### Code Modification Targets
-**Purpose**: Specific code locations for modification AND new files to create
-
-**Format**:
-- Existing files: `file:function:lines` (with line numbers)
-- New files: `file` (no function or lines)
-
-**Identified Targets**:
-1. **Target**: `src/auth/AuthService.ts:login:45-52`
-   - **Type**: Modify existing
-   - **Modification**: Enhance error handling
-   - **Rationale**: Current logic lacks validation for edge cases
-
-2. **Target**: `src/auth/PasswordReset.ts`
-   - **Type**: Create new file
-   - **Purpose**: Password reset functionality
-   - **Rationale**: New feature requirement
-
-3. **Target**: `src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken:30-45`
-   - **Type**: Modify existing
-   - **Modification**: Add token expiry check
-   - **Rationale**: Security requirement for JWT validation
-
-4. **Target**: `tests/auth/PasswordReset.test.ts`
-   - **Type**: Create new file
-   - **Purpose**: Test coverage for password reset
-   - **Rationale**: Test requirement for new feature
-
-**Note**:
-- For new files, only specify the file path (no function or lines)
-- For existing files without line numbers, use `file:function:*` format
-- Task generation will refine these during the `analyze_task_patterns` step
-
-### Feasibility Assessment
-- **Technical Complexity**: {complexity_rating_and_analysis}
-- **Performance Impact**: {expected_performance_characteristics}
-- **Resource Requirements**: {development_resources_needed}
-- **Maintenance Burden**: {ongoing_maintenance_considerations}
-
-### Risk Mitigation
-- **Technical Risks**: {implementation_risks_and_mitigation}
-- **Integration Risks**: {compatibility_challenges_and_solutions}
-- **Performance Risks**: {performance_concerns_and_strategies}
-- **Security Risks**: {security_vulnerabilities_and_controls}
-
----
-
-## 4. Solution Optimization
-
-### Performance Optimization
-- **Optimization Strategies**: {key_performance_improvements}
-- **Caching Strategy**: {caching_approach_and_invalidation}
-- **Resource Management**: {resource_utilization_optimization}
-- **Bottleneck Mitigation**: {identified_bottlenecks_and_solutions}
-
-### Security Enhancements
-- **Security Model**: {authentication_authorization_approach}
-- **Data Protection**: {data_security_and_encryption}
-- **Vulnerability Mitigation**: {known_vulnerabilities_and_controls}
-- **Compliance**: {regulatory_and_compliance_considerations}
-
-### Code Quality
-- **Code Standards**: {coding_conventions_and_patterns}
-- **Testing Coverage**: {test_strategy_and_coverage_goals}
-- **Documentation**: {documentation_requirements}
-- **Maintainability**: {maintainability_practices}
-
----
-
-## 5. Critical Success Factors
-
-### Technical Requirements
-- **Must Have**: {essential_technical_capabilities}
-- **Should Have**: {important_but_not_critical_features}
-- **Nice to Have**: {optional_enhancements}
-
-### Quality Metrics
-- **Performance Benchmarks**: {measurable_performance_targets}
-- **Code Quality Standards**: {quality_metrics_and_thresholds}
-- **Test Coverage Goals**: {testing_coverage_requirements}
-- **Security Standards**: {security_compliance_requirements}
-
-### Success Validation
-- **Acceptance Criteria**: {how_to_validate_success}
-- **Testing Strategy**: {validation_testing_approach}
-- **Monitoring Plan**: {production_monitoring_strategy}
-- **Rollback Plan**: {failure_recovery_strategy}
-
----
-
-## 6. Analysis Confidence & Recommendations
-
-### Assessment Scores
-- **Conceptual Integrity**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
-- **Architectural Soundness**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
-- **Technical Feasibility**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
-- **Implementation Readiness**: {score}/5 - {brief_assessment}
-- **Overall Confidence**: {overall_score}/5
-
-### Final Recommendation
-**Status**: {PROCEED|PROCEED_WITH_MODIFICATIONS|RECONSIDER|REJECT}
-
-**Rationale**: {clear_explanation_of_recommendation}
-
-**Critical Prerequisites**: {what_must_be_resolved_before_proceeding}
-
----
-
-## 7. Reference Information
-
-### Tool Analysis Summary
-- **Gemini Insights**: {key_architectural_and_pattern_insights}
-- **Codex Validation**: {technical_feasibility_and_implementation_notes}
-- **Consensus Points**: {agreements_between_tools}
-- **Conflicting Views**: {disagreements_and_resolution}
-
-### Context & Resources
-- **Analysis Context**: {context_package_reference}
-- **Documentation References**: {relevant_documentation}
-- **Related Patterns**: {similar_implementations_in_codebase}
-- **External Resources**: {external_references_and_best_practices}
-```
-
-## Error Handling & Fallbacks
-
-### Error Handling & Recovery Strategies
-
-1. **Pre-execution Validation**
-   - **Session Verification**: Ensure session directory and metadata exist
-   - **Context Package Validation**: Verify JSON format and content structure
-   - **Tool Availability**: Confirm CLI tools are accessible and configured
-   - **Prerequisite Checks**: Validate all required dependencies and permissions
-
-2. **Execution Monitoring & Timeout Management**
-   - **Progress Monitoring**: Track analysis execution with regular status checks
-   - **Timeout Controls**: 30-minute execution limit with graceful termination
-   - **Process Management**: Handle parallel tool execution and resource limits
-   - **Status Tracking**: Maintain real-time execution state and completion status
-
-3. **Partial Results Recovery**
-   - **Fallback Strategy**: Generate analysis results even with incomplete outputs
-   - **Log Integration**: Use execution logs when primary outputs are unavailable
-   - **Recovery Mode**: Create partial analysis reports with available data
-   - **Guidance Generation**: Provide next steps and retry recommendations
-
-4. **Resource Management**
-   - **Disk Space Monitoring**: Check available storage and cleanup temporary files
-   - **Process Limits**: Set CPU and memory constraints for analysis execution
-   - **Performance Optimization**: Manage resource utilization and system load
-   - **Cleanup Procedures**: Remove outdated logs and temporary files
-
-5. **Comprehensive Error Recovery**
-   - **Error Detection**: Automatic error identification and classification
-   - **Recovery Workflows**: Structured approach to handling different failure modes
-   - **Status Reporting**: Clear communication of issues and resolution attempts
-   - **Graceful Degradation**: Provide useful outputs even with partial failures
-
-## Performance Optimization
-
-### Analysis Optimization Strategies
-- **Parallel Analysis**: Execute multiple tools in parallel to reduce total time
-- **Context Sharding**: Analyze large projects by module shards
-- **Caching Mechanism**: Reuse analysis results for similar contexts
-- **Incremental Analysis**: Perform incremental analysis based on changes
-
-### Resource Management
-```bash
-# Set analysis timeout
-timeout 600s analysis_command || {
-  echo "⚠️ Analysis timeout, generating partial results"
-  # Generate partial results
-}
-
-# Memory usage monitoring
-memory_usage=$(ps -o pid,vsz,rss,comm -p $$)
-if [ "$memory_usage" -gt "$memory_limit" ]; then
-  echo "⚠️ High memory usage detected, optimizing..."
-fi
-```
-
-## Integration Points
-
-### Input Interface
-- **Required**: `--session` parameter specifying session ID (e.g., WFS-auth)
-- **Required**: `--context` parameter specifying context package path
-- **Optional**: `--depth` specify analysis depth (quick|full|deep)
-- **Optional**: `--focus` specify analysis focus areas
-
-### Output Interface
-- **Primary**: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md - solution design and technical analysis
-- **Location**: .workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- **Single Output Policy**: Only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md is generated
-- **No Supplementary Files**: No additional JSON, roadmap, or template files
-
-## Quality Assurance
-
-### Analysis Quality Checks
-- **Completeness Check**: Ensure all required analysis sections are completed
-- **Consistency Check**: Verify consistency of multi-tool analysis results
-- **Feasibility Validation**: Ensure recommended implementation plans are feasible
-
-### Success Criteria
-- ✅ **Solution-Focused Analysis**: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md emphasizes solution improvements, design decisions, and critical insights
-- ✅ **Single Output File**: Only ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated, no supplementary files
-- ✅ **Design Decision Depth**: Clear rationale for architectural choices with alternatives and tradeoffs
-- ✅ **Feasibility Assessment**: Technical complexity, risk analysis, and implementation readiness evaluation
-- ✅ **Optimization Strategies**: Performance, security, and code quality recommendations
-- ✅ **Parallel Execution**: Efficient concurrent tool execution (Gemini + Codex for complex tasks)
-- ✅ **Robust Error Handling**: Comprehensive validation, timeout management, and partial result recovery
-- ✅ **Confidence Scoring**: Multi-dimensional assessment with clear recommendation status
-- ✅ **No Task Planning**: Exclude task breakdowns, implementation steps, and project planning details
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/context:gather` - Generate context packages required by this command
-- `/workflow:plan` - Call this command for analysis
-- `/task:create` - Create specific tasks based on analysis results

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/conflict-resolution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
+---
+name: conflict-resolution
+description: Detect and resolve conflicts between plan and existing codebase using CLI-powered analysis with Gemini/Qwen
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id --context path/to/context-package.json"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session WFS-auth --context .workflow/WFS-auth/.process/context-package.json
+  - /workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session WFS-payment --context .workflow/WFS-payment/.process/context-package.json
+---
+
+# Conflict Resolution Command
+
+## Purpose
+Analyzes conflicts between implementation plans and existing codebase, generating multiple resolution strategies.
+
+**Scope**: Detection and strategy generation only - NO code modification or task creation.
+
+**Trigger**: Auto-executes in `/workflow:plan` Phase 3 when `conflict_risk ≥ medium`.
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+| Responsibility | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| **Detect Conflicts** | Analyze plan vs existing code inconsistencies |
+| **Generate Strategies** | Provide 2-4 resolution options per conflict |
+| **CLI Analysis** | Use Gemini/Qwen (Claude fallback) |
+| **User Decision** | Present options, never auto-apply |
+| **Direct Text Output** | Output questions via text directly, NEVER use bash echo/printf |
+| **Single Output** | `CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md` with findings |
+
+## Conflict Categories
+
+### 1. Architecture Conflicts
+- Incompatible design patterns
+- Module structure changes
+- Pattern migration requirements
+
+### 2. API Conflicts
+- Breaking contract changes
+- Signature modifications
+- Public interface impacts
+
+### 3. Data Model Conflicts
+- Schema modifications
+- Type breaking changes
+- Data migration needs
+
+### 4. Dependency Conflicts
+- Version incompatibilities
+- Setup conflicts
+- Breaking updates
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Validation
+```
+1. Verify session directory exists
+2. Load context-package.json
+3. Check conflict_risk (skip if none/low)
+4. Prepare agent task prompt
+```
+
+### Phase 2: CLI-Powered Analysis
+
+**Agent Delegation**:
+```javascript
+Task(subagent_type="cli-execution-agent", prompt=`
+  ## Context
+  - Session: {session_id}
+  - Risk: {conflict_risk}
+  - Files: {existing_files_list}
+
+  ## Analysis Steps
+
+  ### 1. Load Context
+  - Read existing files from conflict_detection.existing_files
+  - Load plan from .workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+  - Extract role analyses and requirements
+
+  ### 2. Execute CLI Analysis
+
+  Primary (Gemini):
+  cd {project_root} && gemini -p "
+  PURPOSE: Detect conflicts between plan and codebase
+  TASK:
+  • Compare architectures
+  • Identify breaking API changes
+  • Detect data model incompatibilities
+  • Assess dependency conflicts
+  MODE: analysis
+  CONTEXT: @{existing_files} @.workflow/{session_id}/**/*
+  EXPECTED: Conflict list with severity ratings
+  RULES: Focus on breaking changes and migration needs
+  "
+
+  Fallback: Qwen (same prompt) → Claude (manual analysis)
+
+  ### 3. Generate Strategies (2-4 per conflict)
+
+  Template per conflict:
+  - Severity: Critical/High/Medium
+  - Category: Architecture/API/Data/Dependency
+  - Affected files + impact
+  - Options with pros/cons, effort, risk
+  - Recommended strategy + rationale
+
+  ### 4. Return Structured Conflict Data
+
+  ⚠️ DO NOT generate CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file
+
+  Return JSON format for programmatic processing:
+
+  \`\`\`json
+  {
+    "conflicts": [
+      {
+        "id": "CON-001",
+        "brief": "一行中文冲突摘要",
+        "severity": "Critical|High|Medium",
+        "category": "Architecture|API|Data|Dependency",
+        "affected_files": [
+          ".workflow/{session}/.brainstorm/guidance-specification.md",
+          ".workflow/{session}/.brainstorm/system-architect/analysis.md"
+        ],
+        "description": "详细描述冲突 - 什么不兼容",
+        "impact": {
+          "scope": "影响的模块/组件",
+          "compatibility": "Yes|No|Partial",
+          "migration_required": true|false,
+          "estimated_effort": "人天估计"
+        },
+        "strategies": [
+          {
+            "name": "策略名称（中文）",
+            "approach": "实现方法简述",
+            "complexity": "Low|Medium|High",
+            "risk": "Low|Medium|High",
+            "effort": "时间估计",
+            "pros": ["优点1", "优点2"],
+            "cons": ["缺点1", "缺点2"],
+            "modifications": [
+              {
+                "file": ".workflow/{session}/.brainstorm/guidance-specification.md",
+                "section": "## 2. System Architect Decisions",
+                "change_type": "update",
+                "old_content": "原始内容片段（用于定位）",
+                "new_content": "修改后的内容",
+                "rationale": "为什么这样改"
+              },
+              {
+                "file": ".workflow/{session}/.brainstorm/system-architect/analysis.md",
+                "section": "## Design Decisions",
+                "change_type": "update",
+                "old_content": "原始内容片段",
+                "new_content": "修改后的内容",
+                "rationale": "修改理由"
+              }
+            ]
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "策略2名称",
+            "approach": "...",
+            "complexity": "Medium",
+            "risk": "Low",
+            "effort": "1-2天",
+            "pros": ["优点"],
+            "cons": ["缺点"],
+            "modifications": [...]
+          }
+        ],
+        "recommended": 0,
+        "modification_suggestions": [
+          "建议1：具体的修改方向或注意事项",
+          "建议2：可能需要考虑的边界情况",
+          "建议3：相关的最佳实践或模式"
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "summary": {
+      "total": 2,
+      "critical": 1,
+      "high": 1,
+      "medium": 0
+    }
+  }
+  \`\`\`
+
+  ⚠️ CRITICAL Requirements for modifications field:
+  - old_content: Must be exact text from target file (20-100 chars for unique match)
+  - new_content: Complete replacement text (maintains formatting)
+  - change_type: "update" (replace), "add" (insert), "remove" (delete)
+  - file: Full path relative to project root
+  - section: Markdown heading for context (helps locate position)
+  - Minimum 2 strategies per conflict, max 4
+  - All text in Chinese for user-facing fields (brief, name, pros, cons)
+  - modification_suggestions: 2-5 actionable suggestions for custom handling (Chinese)
+
+  Quality Standards:
+  - Each strategy must have actionable modifications
+  - old_content must be precise enough for Edit tool matching
+  - new_content preserves markdown formatting and structure
+  - Recommended strategy (index) based on lowest complexity + risk
+  - modification_suggestions must be specific, actionable, and context-aware
+  - Each suggestion should address a specific aspect (compatibility, migration, testing, etc.)
+`)
+```
+
+**Agent Internal Flow**:
+```
+1. Load context package
+2. Check conflict_risk (exit if none/low)
+3. Read existing files + plan artifacts
+4. Run CLI analysis (Gemini→Qwen→Claude)
+5. Parse conflict findings
+6. Generate 2-4 strategies per conflict with modifications
+7. Return JSON to stdout (NOT file write)
+8. Return execution log path
+```
+
+### Phase 3: User Confirmation via Text Interaction
+
+**Command parses agent JSON output and presents conflicts to user via text**:
+
+```javascript
+// 1. Parse agent JSON output
+const conflictData = JSON.parse(agentOutput);
+const conflicts = conflictData.conflicts; // No 4-conflict limit
+
+// 2. Format conflicts as text output (max 10 per round)
+const batchSize = 10;
+const batches = chunkArray(conflicts, batchSize);
+
+for (const [batchIdx, batch] of batches.entries()) {
+  const totalBatches = batches.length;
+
+  // Output batch header
+  console.log(`===== 冲突解决 (第 ${batchIdx + 1}/${totalBatches} 轮) =====\n`);
+
+  // Output each conflict in batch
+  batch.forEach((conflict, idx) => {
+    const questionNum = batchIdx * batchSize + idx + 1;
+    console.log(`【问题${questionNum} - ${conflict.category}】${conflict.id}: ${conflict.brief}`);
+
+    conflict.strategies.forEach((strategy, sIdx) => {
+      const optionLetter = String.fromCharCode(97 + sIdx); // a, b, c, ...
+      console.log(`${optionLetter}) ${strategy.name}`);
+      console.log(`   说明：${strategy.approach}`);
+      console.log(`   复杂度: ${strategy.complexity} | 风险: ${strategy.risk} | 工作量: ${strategy.effort}`);
+    });
+
+    // Add custom option
+    const customLetter = String.fromCharCode(97 + conflict.strategies.length);
+    console.log(`${customLetter}) 自定义修改`);
+    console.log(`   说明：根据修改建议自行处理，不应用预设策略`);
+
+    // Show modification suggestions
+    if (conflict.modification_suggestions && conflict.modification_suggestions.length > 0) {
+      console.log(`   修改建议：`);
+      conflict.modification_suggestions.forEach(suggestion => {
+        console.log(`   - ${suggestion}`);
+      });
+    }
+    console.log();
+  });
+
+  console.log(`请回答 (格式: 1a 2b 3c...)：`);
+
+  // Wait for user input
+  const userInput = await readUserInput();
+
+  // Parse answers
+  const answers = parseUserAnswers(userInput, batch);
+}
+
+// 3. Build selected strategies (exclude custom selections)
+const selectedStrategies = answers.filter(a => !a.isCustom).map(a => a.strategy);
+const customConflicts = answers.filter(a => a.isCustom).map(a => ({
+  id: a.conflict.id,
+  brief: a.conflict.brief,
+  suggestions: a.conflict.modification_suggestions
+}));
+```
+
+**Text Output Example**:
+```markdown
+===== 冲突解决 (第 1/1 轮) =====
+
+【问题1 - Architecture】CON-001: 现有认证系统与计划不兼容
+a) 渐进式迁移
+   说明：保留现有系统，逐步迁移到新方案
+   复杂度: Medium | 风险: Low | 工作量: 3-5天
+b) 完全重写
+   说明：废弃旧系统，从零实现新认证
+   复杂度: High | 风险: Medium | 工作量: 7-10天
+c) 自定义修改
+   说明：根据修改建议自行处理，不应用预设策略
+   修改建议：
+   - 评估现有认证系统的兼容性，考虑是否可以通过适配器模式桥接
+   - 检查JWT token格式和验证逻辑是否需要调整
+   - 确保用户会话管理与新架构保持一致
+
+【问题2 - Data】CON-002: 数据库 schema 冲突
+a) 添加迁移脚本
+   说明：创建数据库迁移脚本处理 schema 变更
+   复杂度: Low | 风险: Low | 工作量: 1-2天
+b) 自定义修改
+   说明：根据修改建议自行处理，不应用预设策略
+   修改建议：
+   - 检查现有表结构是否支持新增字段，避免破坏性变更
+   - 考虑使用数据库版本控制工具（如Flyway或Liquibase）
+   - 准备数据迁移和回滚策略
+
+请回答 (格式: 1a 2b)：
+```
+
+**User Input Examples**:
+- `1a 2a` → Conflict 1: 渐进式迁移, Conflict 2: 添加迁移脚本
+- `1b 2b` → Conflict 1: 完全重写, Conflict 2: 自定义修改
+- `1c 2c` → Both choose custom modification (user handles manually with suggestions)
+
+### Phase 4: Apply Modifications
+
+```javascript
+// 1. Extract modifications from selected strategies
+const modifications = [];
+selectedStrategies.forEach(strategy => {
+  if (strategy !== "skip") {
+    modifications.push(...strategy.modifications);
+  }
+});
+
+// 2. Apply each modification using Edit tool
+modifications.forEach(mod => {
+  if (mod.change_type === "update") {
+    Edit({
+      file_path: mod.file,
+      old_string: mod.old_content,
+      new_string: mod.new_content
+    });
+  }
+  // Handle "add" and "remove" similarly
+});
+
+// 3. Update context-package.json
+const contextPackage = JSON.parse(Read(contextPath));
+contextPackage.conflict_detection.conflict_risk = "resolved";
+contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolved_conflicts = conflicts.map(c => c.id);
+contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolved_at = new Date().toISOString();
+Write(contextPath, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2));
+
+// 4. Output custom conflict summary (if any)
+if (customConflicts.length > 0) {
+  console.log("\n===== 需要自定义处理的冲突 =====\n");
+  customConflicts.forEach(conflict => {
+    console.log(`【${conflict.id}】${conflict.brief}`);
+    console.log("修改建议：");
+    conflict.suggestions.forEach(suggestion => {
+      console.log(`  - ${suggestion}`);
+    });
+    console.log();
+  });
+}
+
+// 5. Return summary
+return {
+  resolved: modifications.length,
+  custom: customConflicts.length,
+  modified_files: [...new Set(modifications.map(m => m.file))],
+  custom_conflicts: customConflicts
+};
+```
+
+**Validation**:
+```
+✓ Agent returns valid JSON structure
+✓ Text output displays all conflicts (max 10 per round)
+✓ User selections captured correctly
+✓ Edit tool successfully applies modifications
+✓ guidance-specification.md updated
+✓ Role analyses (*.md) updated
+✓ context-package.json marked as resolved
+✓ Agent log saved to .workflow/{session_id}/.chat/
+```
+
+## Output Format: Agent JSON Response
+
+**Focus**: Structured conflict data with actionable modifications for programmatic processing.
+
+**Format**: JSON to stdout (NO file generation)
+
+**Structure**: Defined in Phase 2, Step 4 (agent prompt)
+
+### Key Requirements
+| Requirement | Details |
+|------------|---------|
+| **Conflict batching** | Max 10 conflicts per round (no total limit) |
+| **Strategy count** | 2-4 strategies per conflict |
+| **Modifications** | Each strategy includes file paths, old_content, new_content |
+| **User-facing text** | Chinese (brief, strategy names, pros/cons) |
+| **Technical fields** | English (severity, category, complexity, risk) |
+| **old_content precision** | 20-100 chars for unique Edit tool matching |
+| **File targets** | guidance-specification.md, role analyses (*.md) |
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Recovery Strategy
+```
+1. Pre-check: Verify conflict_risk ≥ medium
+2. Monitor: Track agent via Task tool
+3. Validate: Parse agent JSON output
+4. Recover:
+   - Agent failure → check logs + report error
+   - Invalid JSON → retry once with Claude fallback
+   - CLI failure → fallback to Claude analysis
+   - Edit tool failure → report affected files + rollback option
+   - User cancels → mark as "unresolved", continue to task-generate
+5. Degrade: If all fail, generate minimal conflict report and skip modifications
+```
+
+### Rollback Handling
+```
+If Edit tool fails mid-application:
+1. Log all successfully applied modifications
+2. Output rollback option via text interaction
+3. If rollback selected: restore files from git or backups
+4. If continue: mark partial resolution in context-package.json
+```
+
+## Integration
+
+### Interface
+**Input**:
+- `--session` (required): WFS-{session-id}
+- `--context` (required): context-package.json path
+- Requires: `conflict_risk ≥ medium`
+
+**Output**:
+- Modified files:
+  - `.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorm/guidance-specification.md`
+  - `.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorm/{role}/analysis.md`
+  - `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json` (conflict_risk → resolved)
+- NO report file generation
+
+**User Interaction**:
+- Text-based strategy selection (max 10 conflicts per round)
+- Each conflict: 2-4 strategy options + "自定义修改" option (with suggestions)
+
+### Success Criteria
+```
+✓ CLI analysis returns valid JSON structure
+✓ Conflicts presented in batches (max 10 per round)
+✓ Min 2 strategies per conflict with modifications
+✓ Each conflict includes 2-5 modification_suggestions
+✓ Text output displays all conflicts correctly with suggestions
+✓ User selections captured and processed
+✓ Edit tool applies modifications successfully
+✓ Custom conflicts displayed with suggestions for manual handling
+✓ guidance-specification.md updated with resolved conflicts
+✓ Role analyses (*.md) updated with resolved conflicts
+✓ context-package.json marked as "resolved"
+✓ No CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file generated
+✓ Modification summary includes custom conflict count
+✓ Agent log saved to .workflow/{session_id}/.chat/
+✓ Error handling robust (validate/retry/degrade)
+```
+

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/context-gather.md

@@ -1,300 +1,282 @@
 ---
 name: gather
-description: Intelligently collect project context based on task description and package into standardized JSON
+description: Intelligently collect project context using context-search-agent based on task description, packages into standardized JSON
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id \"task description\""
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-user-auth "Implement user authentication system"
   - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-payment "Refactor payment module API"
   - /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-bugfix "Fix login validation error"
+allowed-tools: Task(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
 # Context Gather Command (/workflow:tools:context-gather)
 
 ## Overview
-Intelligent context collector that gathers relevant information from project codebase, documentation, and dependencies based on task descriptions, generating standardized context packages.
+
+Orchestrator command that invokes `context-search-agent` to gather comprehensive project context for implementation planning. Generates standardized `context-package.json` with codebase analysis, dependencies, and conflict detection.
+
+**Agent**: `context-search-agent` (`.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md`)
 
 ## Core Philosophy
-- **Intelligent Collection**: Auto-identify relevant resources based on keyword analysis
-- **Comprehensive Coverage**: Collect code, documentation, configurations, and dependencies
-- **Standardized Output**: Generate unified format context-package.json
-- **Efficient Execution**: Optimize collection strategies to avoid irrelevant information
 
-## Core Responsibilities
-- **Keyword Extraction**: Extract core keywords from task descriptions
-- **Smart Documentation Loading**: Load relevant project documentation based on keywords
-- **Code Structure Analysis**: Analyze project structure to locate relevant code files
-- **Dependency Discovery**: Identify tech stack and dependency relationships
-- **MCP Tools Integration**: Leverage code-index tools for enhanced collection
-- **Context Packaging**: Generate standardized JSON context packages
+- **Agent Delegation**: Delegate all discovery to `context-search-agent` for autonomous execution
+- **Detection-First**: Check for existing context-package before executing
+- **Plan Mode**: Full comprehensive analysis (vs lightweight brainstorm mode)
+- **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
 
-## Execution Process
+## Execution Flow
 
-### Phase 1: Task Analysis
-1. **Keyword Extraction**
-   - Parse task description to extract core keywords
-   - Identify technical domain (auth, API, frontend, backend, etc.)
-   - Determine complexity level (simple, medium, complex)
+### Step 1: Context-Package Detection
 
-2. **Scope Determination**
-   - Define collection scope based on keywords
-   - Identify potentially involved modules and components
-   - Set file type filters
+**Execute First** - Check if valid package already exists:
 
-### Phase 2: Project Structure Exploration
-1. **Architecture Analysis**
-   - Use `~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh` for comprehensive project structure
-   - Analyze project layout and module organization
-   - Identify key directories and components
+```javascript
+const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
 
-2. **Code File Location**
-   - Use MCP tools for precise search: `mcp__code-index__find_files()` and `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()`
-   - Search for relevant source code files based on keywords
-   - Locate implementation files, interfaces, and modules
+if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
+  const existing = Read(contextPackagePath);
 
-3. **Documentation Collection**
-   - Load CLAUDE.md and README.md
-   - Load relevant documentation from .workflow/docs/ based on keywords
-   - Collect configuration files (package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)
-
-### Phase 3: Intelligent Filtering & Association
-1. **Relevance Scoring**
-   - Score based on keyword match degree
-   - Score based on file path relevance
-   - Score based on code content relevance
-
-2. **Dependency Analysis**
-   - Analyze import/require statements
-   - Identify inter-module dependencies
-   - Determine core and optional dependencies
-
-### Phase 4: Context Packaging
-1. **Standardized Output**
-   - Generate context-package.json
-   - Organize resources by type and importance
-   - Add relevance descriptions and usage recommendations
-
-## Context Package Format
-
-Generated context package format:
-
-```json
-{
-  "metadata": {
-    "task_description": "Implement user authentication system",
-    "timestamp": "2025-09-29T10:30:00Z",
-    "keywords": ["user", "authentication", "JWT", "login"],
-    "complexity": "medium",
-    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "node.js", "express"],
-    "session_id": "WFS-user-auth"
-  },
-  "assets": [
-    {
-      "type": "documentation",
-      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
-      "relevance": "Project development standards and conventions",
-      "priority": "high"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "documentation",
-      "path": ".workflow/docs/architecture/security.md",
-      "relevance": "Security architecture design guidance",
-      "priority": "high"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "source_code",
-      "path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
-      "relevance": "Existing authentication service implementation",
-      "priority": "high"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "source_code",
-      "path": "src/models/User.ts",
-      "relevance": "User data model definition",
-      "priority": "medium"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "config",
-      "path": "package.json",
-      "relevance": "Project dependencies and tech stack",
-      "priority": "medium"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "test",
-      "path": "tests/auth/*.test.ts",
-      "relevance": "Authentication related test cases",
-      "priority": "medium"
-    }
-  ],
-  "tech_stack": {
-    "frameworks": ["express", "typescript"],
-    "libraries": ["jsonwebtoken", "bcrypt"],
-    "testing": ["jest", "supertest"]
-  },
-  "statistics": {
-    "total_files": 15,
-    "source_files": 8,
-    "docs_files": 4,
-    "config_files": 2,
-    "test_files": 1
+  // Validate package belongs to current session
+  if (existing?.metadata?.session_id === session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid context-package found for session:", session_id);
+    console.log("📊 Stats:", existing.statistics);
+    console.log("⚠️  Conflict Risk:", existing.conflict_detection.risk_level);
+    return existing; // Skip execution, return existing
+  } else {
+    console.warn("⚠️ Invalid session_id in existing package, re-generating...");
   }
 }
 ```
 
-## MCP Tools Integration
+### Step 2: Invoke Context-Search Agent
 
-### Code Index Integration
-```bash
-# Set project path
-mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path="{current_project_path}")
+**Only execute if Step 1 finds no valid package**
 
-# Refresh index to ensure latest
-mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
+  description="Gather comprehensive context for plan",
+  prompt=`
+You are executing as context-search-agent (.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md).
 
-# Search relevant files
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*{keyword}*")
+## Execution Mode
+**PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution
 
-# Search code content
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-  pattern="{keyword_patterns}",
-  file_pattern="*.{ts,js,py,go,md}",
-  context_lines=3
+## Session Information
+- **Session ID**: ${session_id}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Output Path**: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+
+## Mission
+Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for implementation planning:
+
+### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
+1. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
+2. **Foundation**: Initialize code-index, get project structure, load docs
+3. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity
+
+### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
+Execute all 4 discovery tracks:
+- **Track 1**: Historical archive analysis (query manifest.json for lessons learned)
+- **Track 2**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
+- **Track 3**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
+- **Track 4**: Codebase analysis (5-layer discovery: files, content, patterns, deps, config/tests)
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
+1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
+2. Synthesize 4-source data (archive > docs > code > web)
+3. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
+4. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
+5. **Inject historical conflicts** from archive analysis into conflict_detection
+6. Generate and validate context-package.json
+
+## Output Requirements
+Complete context-package.json with:
+- **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
+- **project_context**: architecture_patterns, coding_conventions, tech_stack
+- **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
+- **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
+- **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
+- **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy, historical_conflicts[]}
+
+## Quality Validation
+Before completion verify:
+- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
+- [ ] File relevance accuracy >80%
+- [ ] Dependency graph complete (max 2 transitive levels)
+- [ ] Conflict risk level calculated correctly
+- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
+- [ ] Total files ≤50 (prioritize high-relevance)
+
+Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
+Report completion with statistics.
+`
 )
 ```
 
+### Step 3: Output Verification
 
-## Session ID Integration
+After agent completes, verify output:
 
-### Session ID Usage
-- **Required Parameter**: `--session WFS-session-id`
-- **Session Context Loading**: Load existing session state and task summaries
-- **Session Continuity**: Maintain context across pipeline phases
+```javascript
+// Verify file was created
+const outputPath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
+if (!file_exists(outputPath)) {
+  throw new Error("❌ Agent failed to generate context-package.json");
+}
+```
 
-### Session State Management
+## Parameter Reference
+
+| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
+|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
+| `--session` | string | ✅ | Workflow session ID (e.g., WFS-user-auth) |
+| `task_description` | string | ✅ | Detailed task description for context extraction |
+
+## Output Schema
+
+Refer to `context-search-agent.md` Phase 3.7 for complete `context-package.json` schema.
+
+**Key Sections**:
+- **metadata**: Session info, keywords, complexity, tech stack
+- **project_context**: Architecture patterns, conventions, tech stack
+- **assets**: Categorized files with relevance scores (documentation, source_code, config, tests)
+- **dependencies**: Internal and external dependency graphs
+- **brainstorm_artifacts**: Brainstorm documents with full content (if exists)
+- **conflict_detection**: Risk assessment with mitigation strategies and historical conflicts
+
+## Historical Archive Analysis
+
+### Track 1: Query Archive Manifest
+
+The context-search-agent MUST perform historical archive analysis as Track 1 in Phase 2:
+
+**Step 1: Check for Archive Manifest**
 ```bash
-# Validate session exists
-if [ ! -d ".workflow/${session_id}" ]; then
-  echo "❌ Session ${session_id} not found"
-  exit 1
+# Check if archive manifest exists
+if [[ -f .workflow/.archives/manifest.json ]]; then
+  # Manifest available for querying
 fi
-
-# Load session metadata
-session_metadata=".workflow/${session_id}/workflow-session.json"
 ```
 
-## Output Location
+**Step 2: Extract Task Keywords**
+```javascript
+// From current task description, extract key entities and operations
+const keywords = extractKeywords(task_description);
+// Examples: ["User", "model", "authentication", "JWT", "reporting"]
+```
 
-Context package output location:
+**Step 3: Search Archive for Relevant Sessions**
+```javascript
+// Query manifest for sessions with matching tags or descriptions
+const relevantArchives = archives.filter(archive => {
+  return archive.tags.some(tag => keywords.includes(tag)) ||
+         keywords.some(kw => archive.description.toLowerCase().includes(kw.toLowerCase()));
+});
 ```
-.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+
+**Step 4: Extract Watch Patterns**
+```javascript
+// For each relevant archive, check watch_patterns for applicability
+const historicalConflicts = [];
+
+relevantArchives.forEach(archive => {
+  archive.lessons.watch_patterns?.forEach(pattern => {
+    // Check if pattern trigger matches current task
+    if (isPatternRelevant(pattern.pattern, task_description)) {
+      historicalConflicts.push({
+        source_session: archive.session_id,
+        pattern: pattern.pattern,
+        action: pattern.action,
+        files_to_check: pattern.related_files,
+        archived_at: archive.archived_at
+      });
+    }
+  });
+});
 ```
 
+**Step 5: Inject into Context Package**
+```json
+{
+  "conflict_detection": {
+    "risk_level": "medium",
+    "risk_factors": ["..."],
+    "affected_modules": ["..."],
+    "mitigation_strategy": "...",
+    "historical_conflicts": [
+      {
+        "source_session": "WFS-auth-feature",
+        "pattern": "When modifying User model",
+        "action": "Check reporting-service and auditing-service dependencies",
+        "files_to_check": ["src/models/User.ts", "src/services/reporting.ts"],
+        "archived_at": "2025-09-16T09:00:00Z"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Risk Level Escalation
+
+If `historical_conflicts` array is not empty, minimum risk level should be "medium":
+
+```javascript
+if (historicalConflicts.length > 0 && currentRisk === "low") {
+  conflict_detection.risk_level = "medium";
+  conflict_detection.risk_factors.push(
+    `${historicalConflicts.length} historical conflict pattern(s) detected from past sessions`
+  );
+}
+```
+
+### Archive Query Algorithm
+
+```markdown
+1. IF .workflow/.archives/manifest.json does NOT exist → Skip Track 1, continue to Track 2
+2. IF manifest exists:
+   a. Load manifest.json
+   b. Extract keywords from task_description (nouns, verbs, technical terms)
+   c. Filter archives where:
+      - ANY tag matches keywords (case-insensitive) OR
+      - description contains keywords (case-insensitive substring match)
+   d. For each relevant archive:
+      - Read lessons.watch_patterns array
+      - Check if pattern.pattern keywords overlap with task_description
+      - If relevant: Add to historical_conflicts array
+   e. IF historical_conflicts.length > 0:
+      - Set risk_level = max(current_risk, "medium")
+      - Add to risk_factors
+3. Continue to Track 2 (reference documentation)
+```
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-auth-feature "Implement JWT authentication with refresh tokens"
+```
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Valid context-package.json generated in `.workflow/{session}/.process/`
+- ✅ Contains >80% relevant files based on task keywords
+- ✅ Execution completes within 2 minutes
+- ✅ All required schema fields present and valid
+- ✅ Conflict risk accurately assessed
+- ✅ Agent reports completion with statistics
+
 ## Error Handling
 
-### Common Error Handling
-1. **No Active Session**: Create temporary session directory
-2. **MCP Tools Unavailable**: Fallback to traditional bash commands
-3. **Permission Errors**: Prompt user to check file permissions
-4. **Large Project Optimization**: Limit file count, prioritize high-relevance files
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Package validation failed | Invalid session_id in existing package | Re-run agent to regenerate |
+| Agent execution timeout | Large codebase or slow MCP | Increase timeout, check code-index status |
+| Missing required fields | Agent incomplete execution | Check agent logs, verify schema compliance |
+| File count exceeds limit | Too many relevant files | Agent should auto-prioritize top 50 by relevance |
 
-### Graceful Degradation Strategy
-```bash
-# Fallback when MCP unavailable
-if ! command -v mcp__code-index__find_files; then
-  # Use find command for file discovery
-  find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*"
+## Notes
 
-  # Alternative pattern matching
-  find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" \) -exec grep -l "{keyword}" {} \;
-fi
-
-# Use ripgrep instead of MCP search
-rg "{keywords}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source --max-count 30
-
-# Content-based search with context
-rg -A 3 -B 3 "{keywords}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source
-
-# Quick relevance check
-grep -r --include="*.{ts,js,py,go}" -l "{keywords}" . | head -15
-
-# Test files discovery
-find . -name "*test*" -o -name "*spec*" | grep -E "\.(ts|js|py|go)$" | head -10
-
-# Import/dependency analysis
-rg "^(import|from|require|#include)" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source | head -20
-```
-
-## Performance Optimization
-
-### Large Project Optimization Strategy
-- **File Count Limit**: Maximum 50 files per type
-- **Size Filtering**: Skip oversized files (>10MB)
-- **Depth Limit**: Maximum search depth of 3 levels
-- **Caching Strategy**: Cache project structure analysis results
-
-### Parallel Processing
-- Documentation collection and code search in parallel
-- MCP tool calls and traditional commands in parallel
-- Reduce I/O wait time
-
-## Essential Bash Commands (Max 10)
-
-### 1. Project Structure Analysis
-```bash
-~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
-```
-
-### 2. File Discovery by Keywords
-```bash
-find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*"
-```
-
-### 3. Content Search in Code Files
-```bash
-rg "{keyword}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source --max-count 20
-```
-
-### 4. Configuration Files Discovery
-```bash
-find . -maxdepth 3 \( -name "*.json" -o -name "package.json" -o -name "requirements.txt" -o -name "Cargo.toml" \) -not -path "*/node_modules/*"
-```
-
-### 5. Documentation Files Collection
-```bash
-find . -name "*.md" -o -name "README*" -o -name "CLAUDE.md" | grep -v node_modules | head -10
-```
-
-### 6. Test Files Location
-```bash
-find . \( -name "*test*" -o -name "*spec*" \) -type f | grep -E "\.(js|ts|py|go)$" | head -10
-```
-
-### 7. Function/Class Definitions Search
-```bash
-rg "^(function|def|func|class|interface)" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source -n --max-count 15
-```
-
-### 8. Import/Dependency Analysis
-```bash
-rg "^(import|from|require|#include)" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source | head -15
-```
-
-### 9. Workflow Session Information
-```bash
-find .workflow/ -name "*.json" -path "*/${session_id}/*" -o -name "workflow-session.json" | head -5
-```
-
-### 10. Context-Aware Content Search
-```bash
-rg -A 2 -B 2 "{keywords}" --type-add 'source:*.{ts,js,py,go}' -t source --max-count 10
-```
-
-## Success Criteria
-- Generate valid context-package.json file
-- Contains sufficient relevant information for subsequent analysis
-- Execution time controlled within 30 seconds
-- File relevance accuracy rate >80%
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Consumes output of this command for analysis
-- `/workflow:plan` - Calls this command to gather context
-- `/workflow:status` - Can display context collection status
+- **Detection-first**: Always check for existing package before invoking agent
+- **Agent autonomy**: Agent handles all discovery logic per `.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md`
+- **No redundancy**: This command is a thin orchestrator, all logic in agent
+- **Plan-specific**: Use this for implementation planning; brainstorm mode uses direct agent call

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/docs.md

@@ -1,665 +0,0 @@
----
-name: docs
-description: Documentation planning and orchestration - creates structured documentation tasks for execution
-argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--cli-generate]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:docs                              # Current directory (root: full docs, subdir: module only)
-  - /workflow:docs src/modules                  # Module documentation only
-  - /workflow:docs . --tool qwen                # Root directory with Qwen
-  - /workflow:docs --cli-generate               # Use CLI for doc generation (not just analysis)
----
-
-# Documentation Workflow (/workflow:docs)
-
-## Overview
-Lightweight planner that analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. Does NOT generate documentation content itself - delegates to doc-generator agent.
-
-**Two Execution Modes**:
-- **Default**: CLI analyzes in `pre_analysis` (MODE=analysis), agent writes docs in `implementation_approach`
-- **--cli-generate**: CLI generates docs in `implementation_approach` (MODE=write)
-
-## Parameters
-
-```bash
-/workflow:docs [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--cli-generate]
-```
-
-- **path**: Target directory (default: current directory)
-  - Project root → Full documentation (modules + project-level docs)
-  - Subdirectory → Module documentation only (API.md + README.md)
-
-- **--tool**: CLI tool selection (default: gemini)
-  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
-  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
-  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
-
-- **--cli-generate**: Enable CLI-based documentation generation (optional)
-  - When enabled: CLI generates docs with MODE=write in implementation_approach
-  - When disabled (default): CLI analyzes with MODE=analysis in pre_analysis
-
-## Planning Workflow
-
-### Phase 1: Initialize Session
-```bash
-# Parse arguments
-path="${1:-.}"
-tool="gemini"
-cli_generate=false
-
-# Parse options
-while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
-  case "$1" in
-    --tool) tool="$2"; shift 2 ;;
-    --cli-generate) cli_generate=true; shift ;;
-    *) shift ;;
-  esac
-done
-
-# Detect project root
-bash(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
-project_root=$(pwd)
-target_path=$(cd "$path" && pwd)
-is_root=false
-[[ "$target_path" == "$project_root" ]] && is_root=true
-
-# Create session structure
-timestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
-session_dir=".workflow/WFS-docs-${timestamp}"
-
-bash(mkdir -p "${session_dir}"/{.task,.process,.summaries})
-bash(touch ".workflow/.active-WFS-docs-${timestamp}")
-
-# Record configuration
-bash(cat > "${session_dir}/.process/config.txt" <<EOF
-path=$path
-target_path=$target_path
-is_root=$is_root
-tool=$tool
-cli_generate=$cli_generate
-EOF
-)
-```
-
-### Phase 2: Analyze Structure
-```bash
-# Step 1: Discover module hierarchy
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
-# Output: depth:N|path:<PATH>|files:N|size:N|has_claude:yes/no
-
-# Step 2: Classify folders by type
-bash(cat > "${session_dir}/.process/classify-folders.sh" <<'SCRIPT'
-while IFS='|' read -r depth_info path_info files_info size_info claude_info; do
-  folder_path=$(echo "$path_info" | cut -d':' -f2-)
-
-  # Count code files (maxdepth 1)
-  code_files=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type f \
-    \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" \
-       -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.rs" \) \
-    2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-
-  # Count subfolders
-  subfolders=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type d \
-    -not -path "$folder_path" 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-
-  # Determine type
-  if [[ $code_files -gt 0 ]]; then
-    folder_type="code"  # API.md + README.md
-  elif [[ $subfolders -gt 0 ]]; then
-    folder_type="navigation"  # README.md only
-  else
-    folder_type="skip"  # Empty
-  fi
-
-  echo "${folder_path}|${folder_type}|code:${code_files}|dirs:${subfolders}"
-done
-SCRIPT
-)
-
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | bash "${session_dir}/.process/classify-folders.sh" > "${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt")
-
-# Step 3: Group by top-level directories
-bash(awk -F'|' '{split($1, parts, "/"); if (length(parts) >= 2) print parts[1] "/" parts[2]}' \
-  "${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt" | sort -u > "${session_dir}/.process/top-level-dirs.txt")
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Detect Update Mode
-```bash
-# Check existing documentation
-bash(find "$target_path" -name "API.md" -o -name "README.md" -o -name "ARCHITECTURE.md" -o -name "EXAMPLES.md" 2>/dev/null | grep -v ".workflow" | wc -l)
-
-existing_docs=$(...)
-
-if [[ $existing_docs -gt 0 ]]; then
-  bash(find "$target_path" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | grep -v ".workflow" > "${session_dir}/.process/existing-docs.txt")
-  echo "mode=update" >> "${session_dir}/.process/config.txt"
-else
-  echo "mode=create" >> "${session_dir}/.process/config.txt"
-fi
-
-# Record strategy
-bash(cat > "${session_dir}/.process/strategy.md" <<EOF
-**Path**: ${target_path}
-**Is Root**: ${is_root}
-**Tool**: ${tool}
-**CLI Generate**: ${cli_generate}
-**Mode**: $(grep 'mode=' "${session_dir}/.process/config.txt" | cut -d'=' -f2)
-**Existing Docs**: ${existing_docs} files
-EOF
-)
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Decompose Tasks
-
-**Task Hierarchy**:
-```
-Level 1: Module Tree Tasks (Always generated, can execute in parallel)
-  ├─ IMPL-001: Document tree 'src/modules/'
-  ├─ IMPL-002: Document tree 'src/utils/'
-  └─ IMPL-003: Document tree 'lib/'
-
-Level 2: Project README (Only if is_root=true, depends on Level 1)
-  └─ IMPL-004: Generate Project README
-
-Level 3: Architecture & Examples (Only if is_root=true, depends on Level 2)
-  ├─ IMPL-005: Generate ARCHITECTURE.md
-  ├─ IMPL-006: Generate EXAMPLES.md
-  └─ IMPL-007: Generate HTTP API docs (optional)
-```
-
-**Implementation**:
-```bash
-# Generate Level 1 tasks (always)
-task_count=0
-while read -r top_dir; do
-  task_count=$((task_count + 1))
-  # Create IMPL-00${task_count}.json for module tree
-done < "${session_dir}/.process/top-level-dirs.txt"
-
-# Generate Level 2-3 tasks (only if root)
-if [[ "$is_root" == "true" ]]; then
-  # IMPL-00$((task_count+1)).json: Project README
-  # IMPL-00$((task_count+2)).json: ARCHITECTURE.md
-  # IMPL-00$((task_count+3)).json: EXAMPLES.md
-  # IMPL-00$((task_count+4)).json: HTTP API (optional)
-fi
-```
-
-### Phase 5: Generate Task JSONs
-
-```bash
-# Read configuration
-cli_generate=$(grep 'cli_generate=' "${session_dir}/.process/config.txt" | cut -d'=' -f2)
-tool=$(grep 'tool=' "${session_dir}/.process/config.txt" | cut -d'=' -f2)
-
-# Determine CLI command placement
-if [[ "$cli_generate" == "true" ]]; then
-  # CLI generates docs: MODE=write, place in implementation_approach
-  mode="write"
-  placement="implementation_approach"
-  approval_flag="--approval-mode yolo"
-else
-  # CLI for analysis only: MODE=analysis, place in pre_analysis
-  mode="analysis"
-  placement="pre_analysis"
-  approval_flag=""
-fi
-
-# Build tool-specific command
-if [[ "$tool" == "codex" ]]; then
-  cmd="codex -C ${dir} --full-auto exec \"...\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access"
-else
-  cmd="bash(cd ${dir} && ~/.claude/scripts/${tool}-wrapper ${approval_flag} -p \"...MODE: ${mode}...\")"
-fi
-```
-
-## Task Templates
-
-### Level 1: Module Tree Task
-
-**Default Mode (cli_generate=false)**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Document Module Tree: 'src/modules/'",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs-tree",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "cli_generate": false
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Recursively process all folders in src/modules/",
-      "For code folders: generate API.md + README.md",
-      "For navigation folders: generate README.md only"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/modules"],
-    "folder_analysis_file": "${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt"
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_docs",
-        "command": "bash(find src/modules -name '*.md' 2>/dev/null | xargs cat || echo 'No existing docs')",
-        "output_to": "existing_module_docs"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_folder_analysis",
-        "command": "bash(grep '^src/modules' ${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt)",
-        "output_to": "target_folders"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_module_tree",
-        "command": "bash(cd src/modules && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze module structure\\nTASK: Generate documentation outline\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*} [target_folders]\\nEXPECTED: Structure outline\\nRULES: Analyze only\")",
-        "output_to": "tree_outline",
-        "note": "CLI for analysis only"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Generate module tree documentation",
-        "description": "Process target folders and generate appropriate documentation files based on folder types",
-        "modification_points": ["Parse folder types from [target_folders]", "Parse structure from [tree_outline]", "Generate API.md for code folders", "Generate README.md for all folders"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Parse [target_folders] to get folder types", "Parse [tree_outline] for structure", "For each folder: if type == 'code': Generate API.md + README.md; elif type == 'navigation': Generate README.md only"],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "module_docs"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [
-      ".workflow/docs/modules/*/API.md",
-      ".workflow/docs/modules/*/README.md"
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**CLI Generate Mode (cli_generate=true)**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Document Module Tree: 'src/modules/'",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs-tree",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "cli_generate": true
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Recursively process all folders in src/modules/",
-      "CLI generates documentation files directly"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/modules"]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_docs",
-        "command": "bash(find src/modules -name '*.md' 2>/dev/null | xargs cat || echo 'No existing docs')",
-        "output_to": "existing_module_docs"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_folder_analysis",
-        "command": "bash(grep '^src/modules' ${session_dir}/.process/folder-analysis.txt)",
-        "output_to": "target_folders"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Parse folder analysis",
-        "description": "Parse [target_folders] to get folder types and structure",
-        "modification_points": ["Extract folder types", "Identify code vs navigation folders"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Parse [target_folders] to get folder types", "Prepare folder list for CLI generation"],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "folder_types"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": 2,
-        "title": "Generate documentation via CLI",
-        "description": "Call CLI to generate documentation files for each folder using MODE=write",
-        "modification_points": ["Execute CLI generation command", "Generate API.md and README.md files"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Call CLI to generate documentation files for each folder"],
-        "command": "bash(cd src/modules && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p \"PURPOSE: Generate module docs\\nTASK: Create documentation files\\nMODE: write\\nCONTEXT: @{**/*} [target_folders] [existing_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: API.md and README.md files\\nRULES: Generate complete docs\")",
-        "depends_on": [1],
-        "output": "generated_docs"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [
-      ".workflow/docs/modules/*/API.md",
-      ".workflow/docs/modules/*/README.md"
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Level 2: Project README Task
-
-**Default Mode**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-004",
-  "title": "Generate Project README",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-002", "IMPL-003"],
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "cli_generate": false
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_readme",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing README')",
-        "output_to": "existing_readme"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_module_docs",
-        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/modules -name '*.md' | xargs cat)",
-        "output_to": "all_module_docs"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_project",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project structure\\nTASK: Extract overview from modules\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Project outline\")",
-        "output_to": "project_outline"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Generate project README",
-        "description": "Generate project README with navigation links while preserving existing user modifications",
-        "modification_points": ["Parse [project_outline] and [all_module_docs]", "Generate project README structure", "Add navigation links to modules", "Preserve [existing_readme] user modifications"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Parse [project_outline] and [all_module_docs]", "Generate project README with navigation links", "Preserve [existing_readme] user modifications"],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "project_readme"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/README.md"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Level 3: Architecture Documentation Task
-
-**Default Mode**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-005",
-  "title": "Generate Architecture Documentation",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "depends_on": ["IMPL-004"],
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "cli_generate": false
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_arch",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing ARCHITECTURE')",
-        "output_to": "existing_architecture"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_all_docs",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/README.md && find .workflow/docs/modules -name '*.md' | xargs cat)",
-        "output_to": "all_docs"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_architecture",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze system architecture\\nTASK: Synthesize architectural overview\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture outline\")",
-        "output_to": "arch_outline"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Generate architecture documentation",
-        "description": "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md while preserving existing user modifications",
-        "modification_points": ["Parse [arch_outline] and [all_docs]", "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md structure", "Document system design and patterns", "Preserve [existing_architecture] modifications"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Parse [arch_outline] and [all_docs]", "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md", "Preserve [existing_architecture] modifications"],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "architecture_doc"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Level 3: Examples Documentation Task
-
-**Default Mode**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-006",
-  "title": "Generate Examples Documentation",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "depends_on": ["IMPL-004"],
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "cli_generate": false
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_examples",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/EXAMPLES.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing EXAMPLES')",
-        "output_to": "existing_examples"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_project_readme",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/README.md)",
-        "output_to": "project_readme"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "generate_examples_outline",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Generate usage examples\\nTASK: Extract example patterns\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [project_readme]\\nEXPECTED: Examples outline\")",
-        "output_to": "examples_outline"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Generate examples documentation",
-        "description": "Generate EXAMPLES.md with code snippets while preserving existing user modifications",
-        "modification_points": ["Parse [examples_outline] and [project_readme]", "Generate EXAMPLES.md structure", "Add code snippets and usage examples", "Preserve [existing_examples] modifications"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Parse [examples_outline] and [project_readme]", "Generate EXAMPLES.md with code snippets", "Preserve [existing_examples] modifications"],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "examples_doc"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/EXAMPLES.md"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Level 3: HTTP API Documentation Task (Optional)
-
-**Default Mode**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-007",
-  "title": "Generate HTTP API Documentation",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "depends_on": ["IMPL-004"],
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "docs",
-    "agent": "@doc-generator",
-    "tool": "gemini",
-    "cli_generate": false
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "discover_api_endpoints",
-        "command": "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern='router\\.|@(Get|Post)', file_pattern='*.{ts,js}')",
-        "output_to": "endpoint_discovery"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_api_docs",
-        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/api/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing API docs')",
-        "output_to": "existing_api_docs"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_api",
-        "command": "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document HTTP API\\nTASK: Analyze API endpoints\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @{src/api/**/*} [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: API outline\")",
-        "output_to": "api_outline"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Generate HTTP API documentation",
-        "description": "Generate HTTP API documentation while preserving existing user modifications",
-        "modification_points": ["Parse [api_outline] and [endpoint_discovery]", "Generate HTTP API documentation", "Document endpoints and request/response formats", "Preserve [existing_api_docs] modifications"],
-        "logic_flow": ["Parse [api_outline] and [endpoint_discovery]", "Generate HTTP API documentation", "Preserve [existing_api_docs] modifications"],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "api_docs"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/api/README.md"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-## Session Structure
-
-```
-.workflow/
-├── .active-WFS-docs-20240120-143022
-└── WFS-docs-20240120-143022/
-    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md              # Implementation plan
-    ├── TODO_LIST.md              # Progress tracker
-    ├── .process/
-    │   ├── config.txt            # path, is_root, tool, cli_generate, mode
-    │   ├── strategy.md           # Documentation strategy summary
-    │   ├── folder-analysis.txt   # Folder type classification
-    │   ├── top-level-dirs.txt    # Top-level directory list
-    │   └── existing-docs.txt     # Existing documentation files
-    └── .task/
-        ├── IMPL-001.json         # Module tree task
-        ├── IMPL-002.json         # Module tree task
-        ├── IMPL-003.json         # Module tree task
-        ├── IMPL-004.json         # Project README (if root)
-        ├── IMPL-005.json         # Architecture (if root)
-        ├── IMPL-006.json         # Examples (if root)
-        └── IMPL-007.json         # HTTP API (if root, optional)
-```
-
-## Generated Documentation
-
-```
-.workflow/docs/
-├── modules/                           # Level 1 output
-│   ├── README.md                      # Navigation for modules/
-│   ├── auth/
-│   │   ├── API.md                     # Auth module API signatures
-│   │   ├── README.md                  # Auth module documentation
-│   │   └── middleware/
-│   │       ├── API.md                 # Middleware API
-│   │       └── README.md              # Middleware docs
-│   └── api/
-│       ├── API.md                     # API module signatures
-│       └── README.md                  # API module docs
-├── README.md                          # Level 2 output (root only)
-├── ARCHITECTURE.md                    # Level 3 output (root only)
-├── EXAMPLES.md                        # Level 3 output (root only)
-└── api/                               # Level 3 output (optional)
-    └── README.md                      # HTTP API reference
-```
-
-## Execution Commands
-
-### Root Directory (Full Documentation)
-```bash
-# Level 1 - Module documentation (parallel)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-001
-/workflow:execute IMPL-002
-/workflow:execute IMPL-003
-
-# Level 2 - Project README (after Level 1)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-004
-
-# Level 3 - Architecture & Examples (after Level 2, parallel)
-/workflow:execute IMPL-005
-/workflow:execute IMPL-006
-/workflow:execute IMPL-007  # if HTTP API present
-```
-
-### Subdirectory (Module Only)
-```bash
-# Only Level 1 task generated
-/workflow:execute IMPL-001
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Check Documentation Status
-```bash
-# List existing documentation
-bash(find . -name "API.md" -o -name "README.md" -o -name "ARCHITECTURE.md" 2>/dev/null | grep -v ".workflow")
-
-# Count documentation files
-bash(find . -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | grep -v ".workflow" | wc -l)
-```
-
-### Analyze Module Structure
-```bash
-# Discover modules
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
-
-# Count code files in directory
-bash(find src/modules -maxdepth 1 -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" \) | wc -l)
-
-# Count subdirectories
-bash(find src/modules -maxdepth 1 -type d -not -path "src/modules" | wc -l)
-```
-
-### Session Management
-```bash
-# Create session directories
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.{task,process,summaries})
-
-# Mark session as active
-bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-docs-20240120)
-
-# Read session configuration
-bash(cat .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/config.txt)
-
-# List session tasks
-bash(ls .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.task/*.json)
-```
-
-## Template Reference
-
-**Available Templates**:
-- `api.txt`: Unified template for Code API (Part A) and HTTP API (Part B)
-- `module-readme.txt`: Module purpose, usage, dependencies
-- `folder-navigation.txt`: Navigation README for folders with subdirectories
-- `project-readme.txt`: Project overview, getting started, module navigation
-- `project-architecture.txt`: System structure, module map, design patterns
-- `project-examples.txt`: End-to-end usage examples
-
-**Template Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/`
-
-## CLI Generate Mode Summary
-
-| Mode | CLI Placement | CLI MODE | Agent Role |
-|------|---------------|----------|------------|
-| **Default** | pre_analysis | analysis | Generates documentation files |
-| **--cli-generate** | implementation_approach | write | Validates and coordinates CLI output |
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:execute` - Execute documentation tasks
-- `/workflow:status` - View task progress
-- `/workflow:session:complete` - Mark session complete

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-agent.md

@@ -1,21 +1,25 @@
 ---
 name: task-generate-agent
-description: Autonomous task generation using action-planning-agent with discovery and output phases
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
+description: Autonomous task generation using action-planning-agent with discovery and output phases for workflow planning
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--cli-execute]"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
+  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
 ---
 
 # Autonomous Task Generation Command
 
 ## Overview
-Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation.
+Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation. Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution modes.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 - **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
 - **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
 - **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
 - **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and research
+- **Pre-Selected Templates**: Command selects correct template based on `--cli-execute` flag **before** invoking agent
+- **Agent Simplicity**: Agent receives pre-selected template and focuses only on content generation
+- **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root (e.g., `./src/module`)
 
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
@@ -26,21 +30,27 @@ Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent wit
 ```javascript
 {
   "session_id": "WFS-[session-id]",
+  "execution_mode": "agent-mode" | "cli-execute-mode",  // Determined by flag
+  "task_json_template_path": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt"
+                           | "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt",
+  // Path selected by command based on --cli-execute flag, agent reads it
   "session_metadata": {
     // If in memory: use cached content
     // Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
   },
-  "analysis_results": {
-    // If in memory: use cached content
-    // Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-  },
-  "artifacts_inventory": {
-    // If in memory: use cached list
-    // Else: Scan .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/ directory
-    "synthesis_specification": "path or null",
-    "topic_framework": "path or null",
-    "role_analyses": ["paths"]
+  "brainstorm_artifacts": {
+    // Loaded from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts section
+    "role_analyses": [
+      {
+        "role": "system-architect",
+        "files": [{"path": "...", "type": "primary|supplementary"}]
+      }
+    ],
+    "guidance_specification": {"path": "...", "exists": true},
+    "synthesis_output": {"path": "...", "exists": true},
+    "conflict_resolution": {"path": "...", "exists": true}  // if conflict_risk >= medium
   },
+  "context_package_path": ".workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json",
   "context_package": {
     // If in memory: use cached content
     // Else: Load from .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
@@ -61,31 +71,38 @@ Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent wit
    }
    ```
 
-2. **Load Analysis Results** (if not in memory)
+2. **Load Context Package** (if not in memory)
    ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")) {
-     Read(.workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
+   if (!memory.has("context-package.json")) {
+     Read(.workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json)
    }
    ```
 
-3. **Discover Artifacts** (if not in memory)
+3. **Extract & Load Role Analyses** (from context-package.json)
    ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("artifacts_inventory")) {
-     bash(find .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/ -name "*.md" -type f)
+   // Extract role analysis paths from context package
+   const roleAnalysisPaths = contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses
+     .flatMap(role => role.files.map(f => f.path));
+
+   // Load each role analysis file
+   roleAnalysisPaths.forEach(path => Read(path));
+   ```
+
+4. **Load Conflict Resolution** (from context-package.json, if exists)
+   ```javascript
+   if (contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution?.exists) {
+     Read(contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
    }
    ```
 
-4. **MCP Code Analysis** (optional - enhance understanding)
-   ```javascript
-   // Find relevant files for task context
-   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
-   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-     pattern="authentication|oauth",
-     file_pattern="*.ts"
-   )
+5. **Code Analysis with Native Tools** (optional - enhance understanding)
+   ```bash
+   # Find relevant files for task context
+   find . -name "*auth*" -type f
+   rg "authentication|oauth" -g "*.ts"
    ```
 
-5. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather best practices)
+6. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather best practices)
    ```javascript
    // Get external examples for implementation
    mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
@@ -96,6 +113,14 @@ Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent wit
 
 ### Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
 
+**Pre-Agent Template Selection** (Command decides path before invoking agent):
+```javascript
+// Command checks flag and selects template PATH (not content)
+const templatePath = hasCliExecuteFlag
+  ? "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt"
+  : "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt";
+```
+
 **Agent Invocation**:
 ```javascript
 Task(
@@ -105,23 +130,32 @@ Task(
 ## Execution Context
 
 **Session ID**: WFS-{session-id}
-**Mode**: Two-Phase Autonomous Task Generation
+**Execution Mode**: {agent-mode | cli-execute-mode}
+**Task JSON Template Path**: {template_path}
 
 ## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
 
 ### Session Metadata
 {session_metadata_content}
 
-### Analysis Results
-{analysis_results_content}
+### Role Analyses (Enhanced by Synthesis)
+{role_analyses_content}
+- Includes requirements, design specs, enhancements, and clarifications from synthesis phase
 
 ### Artifacts Inventory
-- **Synthesis Specification**: {synthesis_spec_path}
-- **Topic Framework**: {topic_framework_path}
+- **Guidance Specification**: {guidance_spec_path}
 - **Role Analyses**: {role_analyses_list}
 
 ### Context Package
 {context_package_summary}
+- Includes conflict_risk assessment
+
+### Conflict Resolution (Conditional)
+If conflict_risk was medium/high, modifications have been applied to:
+- **guidance-specification.md**: Design decisions updated to resolve conflicts
+- **Role analyses (*.md)**: Recommendations adjusted for compatibility
+- **context-package.json**: Marked as "resolved" with conflict IDs
+- NO separate CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file (conflicts resolved in-place)
 
 ### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
 **Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
@@ -129,470 +163,62 @@ Task(
 
 ## Phase 2: Document Generation Task
 
-### Task Decomposition Standards
-**Core Principle**: Task Merging Over Decomposition
-- **Merge Rule**: Execute together when possible
-- **Decompose Only When**:
-  - Excessive workload (>2500 lines or >6 files)
-  - Different tech stacks or domains
-  - Sequential dependency blocking
-  - Parallel execution needed
+**Agent Configuration Reference**: All task generation rules, quantification requirements, quality standards, and execution details are defined in action-planning-agent.
 
-**Task Limits**:
-- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit)
-- **Function-based**: Complete units (logic + UI + tests + config)
-- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5) | Two-level (6-10) | Re-scope (>10)
+Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
+- Task Decomposition Standards
+- Quantification Requirements (MANDATORY)
+- 5-Field Task JSON Schema
+- IMPL_PLAN.md Structure
+- TODO_LIST.md Format
+- Execution Flow & Quality Validation
 
-### Required Outputs
+### Required Outputs Summary
 
 #### 1. Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
-**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/.task/
-**Schema**: 5-field enhanced schema with artifacts
-
-**Required Fields**:
-\`\`\`json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-N[.M]",
-  "title": "Descriptive task name",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test|docs",
-    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": ["extracted from analysis"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/paths"],
-    "acceptance": ["measurable criteria"],
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-N"],
-    "artifacts": [
-      {
-        "type": "synthesis_specification",
-        "path": "{synthesis_spec_path}",
-        "priority": "highest",
-        "usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "role_analysis",
-        "path": "{role_analysis_path}",
-        "priority": "high",
-        "usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
-        "note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files included based on brainstorming results"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "topic_framework",
-        "path": "{topic_framework_path}",
-        "priority": "low",
-        "usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
-        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(ls {synthesis_spec_path} 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')",
-          "Read({synthesis_spec_path})"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
-        "action": "Explore codebase using MCP",
-        "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\\"[patterns]\\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\\"[patterns]\\")",
-        "output_to": "codebase_structure"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_task_patterns",
-        "action": "Analyze existing code patterns",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(cd \\"[focus_paths]\\")",
-          "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \\"PURPOSE: Analyze patterns TASK: Review '[title]' CONTEXT: [synthesis_specification] EXPECTED: Pattern analysis RULES: Prioritize synthesis-specification.md\\")"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "task_context",
-        "on_error": "fail"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Implement task following synthesis specification",
-        "description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
-        "modification_points": [
-          "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
-          "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
-          "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
-          "Integrate with existing patterns"
-        ],
-        "logic_flow": [
-          "Load synthesis specification and relevant role artifacts",
-          "Execute MCP code-index discovery for relevant files",
-          "Analyze existing patterns and identify modification targets",
-          "Implement following specification",
-          "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
-          "Validate against acceptance criteria"
-        ],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "implementation"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
-  }
-}
-\`\`\`
+- **Location**: `.workflow/{session-id}/.task/`
+- **Template**: Read from `{template_path}` (pre-selected by command based on `--cli-execute` flag)
+- **Schema**: 5-field structure (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control) with artifacts integration
+- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Task JSON Generation
 
 #### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md
-**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
-**Structure**:
-\`\`\`markdown
----
-identifier: WFS-{session-id}
-source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
-analysis: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-artifacts: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/
-context_package: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
-workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design"  # Indicates execution model
-verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
-  concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
-  action_plan_verify: "pending"
-phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → analysis → concept_verify → planning"  # CCW workflow phases
----
-
-# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
-
-## 1. Summary
-Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
-
-**Core Objectives**:
-- [Key objective 1]
-- [Key objective 2]
-
-**Technical Approach**:
-- [High-level approach]
-
-## 2. Context Analysis
-
-### CCW Workflow Context
-**Phase Progression**:
-- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (synthesis-specification.md generated)
-- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
-- ✅ Phase 3: Enhanced Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel insights)
-- ✅ Phase 4: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, synthesis updated | skipped)
-- ⏳ Phase 5: Action Planning (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md)
-
-**Quality Gates**:
-- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (0 ambiguities remaining) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
-- action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
-
-**Context Package Summary**:
-- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
-- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
-- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
-- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {dependency count} dependencies identified
-
-### Project Profile
-- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
-- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
-- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
-- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
-
-### Module Structure
-\`\`\`
-[Directory tree showing key modules]
-\`\`\`
-
-### Dependencies
-**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
-**APIs**: [External services]
-**Development**: [Testing, linting, CI/CD tools]
-
-### Patterns & Conventions
-- **Architecture**: [Key patterns like DI, Event-Driven]
-- **Component Design**: [Design patterns]
-- **State Management**: [State strategy]
-- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
-
-## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
-
-### Artifact Usage Strategy
-**Primary Reference (synthesis-specification.md)**:
-- **What**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint from multi-role synthesis
-- **When**: Every task references this first for requirements and design decisions
-- **How**: Extract architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns, functional requirements, non-functional requirements
-- **Priority**: Authoritative - overrides role-specific analyses when conflicts arise
-- **CCW Value**: Consolidates insights from all brainstorming roles into single source of truth
-
-**Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
-- **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
-- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure
-- **Usage**: Tasks load this via \`flow_control.preparatory_steps\` for environment setup
-- **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
-
-**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
-- **What**: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel analysis results
-- **Content**: Optimization strategies, risk assessment, architecture review, implementation patterns
-- **Usage**: Referenced in task planning for technical guidance and risk mitigation
-- **CCW Value**: Multi-model parallel analysis providing comprehensive technical intelligence
-
-### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
-- **synthesis-specification.md**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
-  - Contains: Architecture design, UI/UX guidelines, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation roadmap, risk assessment
-
-### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
-- **topic-framework.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
-- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Detailed architecture specifications
-- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Layout and component specifications
-- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Product vision and user stories
-
-**Artifact Priority in Development**:
-1. synthesis-specification.md (primary reference for all tasks)
-2. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
-3. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis and optimization strategies)
-4. Role-specific analyses (fallback for detailed specifications)
-
-## 4. Implementation Strategy
-
-### Execution Strategy
-**Execution Model**: [Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles]
-
-**Rationale**: [Why this execution model fits the project]
-
-**Parallelization Opportunities**:
-- [List independent workstreams]
-
-**Serialization Requirements**:
-- [List critical dependencies]
-
-### Architectural Approach
-**Key Architecture Decisions**:
-- [ADR references from synthesis]
-- [Justification for architecture patterns]
-
-**Integration Strategy**:
-- [How modules communicate]
-- [State management approach]
-
-### Key Dependencies
-**Task Dependency Graph**:
-\`\`\`
-[High-level dependency visualization]
-\`\`\`
-
-**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
-
-### Testing Strategy
-**Testing Approach**:
-- Unit testing: [Tools, scope]
-- Integration testing: [Key integration points]
-- E2E testing: [Critical user flows]
-
-**Coverage Targets**:
-- Lines: ≥70%
-- Functions: ≥70%
-- Branches: ≥65%
-
-**Quality Gates**:
-- [CI/CD gates]
-- [Performance budgets]
-
-## 5. Task Breakdown Summary
-
-### Task Count
-**{N} tasks** (flat hierarchy | two-level hierarchy, sequential | parallel execution)
-
-### Task Structure
-- **IMPL-1**: [Main task title]
-- **IMPL-2**: [Main task title]
-...
-
-### Complexity Assessment
-- **High**: [List with rationale]
-- **Medium**: [List]
-- **Low**: [List]
-
-### Dependencies
-[Reference Section 4.3 for dependency graph]
-
-**Parallelization Opportunities**:
-- [Specific task groups that can run in parallel]
-
-## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
-
-### Execution Strategy
-
-**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): [Phase Name]**
-- **Tasks**: IMPL-1, IMPL-2
-- **Deliverables**:
-  - [Specific deliverable 1]
-  - [Specific deliverable 2]
-- **Success Criteria**:
-  - [Measurable criterion]
-
-**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): [Phase Name]**
-...
-
-### Resource Requirements
-
-**Development Team**:
-- [Team composition and skills]
-
-**External Dependencies**:
-- [Third-party services, APIs]
-
-**Infrastructure**:
-- [Development, staging, production environments]
-
-## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
-
-| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
-|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
-| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Strategy] | [Role] |
-
-**Critical Risks** (High impact + High probability):
-- [Risk 1]: [Detailed mitigation plan]
-
-**Monitoring Strategy**:
-- [How risks will be monitored]
-
-## 8. Success Criteria
-
-**Functional Completeness**:
-- [ ] All requirements from synthesis-specification.md implemented
-- [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
-
-**Technical Quality**:
-- [ ] Test coverage ≥70%
-- [ ] Bundle size within budget
-- [ ] Performance targets met
-
-**Operational Readiness**:
-- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
-- [ ] Monitoring and logging configured
-- [ ] Documentation complete
-
-**Business Metrics**:
-- [ ] [Key business metrics from synthesis]
-\`\`\`
+- **Location**: `.workflow/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md`
+- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/impl-plan-template.txt`
+- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Implementation Plan Creation
 
 #### 3. TODO_LIST.md
-**Location**: .workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md
-**Structure**:
-\`\`\`markdown
-# Tasks: {Session Topic}
+- **Location**: `.workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
+- **Format**: Hierarchical task list with status indicators (▸, [ ], [x]) and JSON links
+- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § TODO List Generation
 
-## Task Progress
-▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
-  - [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
-  - [ ] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json)
+### Agent Execution Summary
 
-- [ ] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json)
+**Key Steps** (Detailed instructions in action-planning-agent.md):
+1. Load task JSON template from provided path
+2. Extract and decompose tasks with quantification
+3. Generate task JSON files enforcing quantification requirements
+4. Create IMPL_PLAN.md using template
+5. Generate TODO_LIST.md matching task JSONs
+6. Update session state
 
-## Status Legend
-- \`▸\` = Container task (has subtasks)
-- \`- [ ]\` = Pending leaf task
-- \`- [x]\` = Completed leaf task
-\`\`\`
-
-### Execution Instructions
-
-**Step 1: Extract Task Definitions**
-- Parse analysis results for task recommendations
-- Extract task ID, title, requirements, complexity
-- Map artifacts to relevant tasks based on type
-
-**Step 2: Generate Task JSON Files**
-- Create individual .task/IMPL-*.json files
-- Embed artifacts array with detected brainstorming outputs
-- Generate flow_control with artifact loading steps
-- Add MCP tool integration for codebase exploration
-
-**Step 3: Create IMPL_PLAN.md**
-- Summarize requirements and technical approach
-- List detected artifacts with priorities
-- Document task breakdown and dependencies
-- Define execution strategy and success criteria
-
-**Step 4: Generate TODO_LIST.md**
-- List all tasks with container/leaf structure
-- Link to task JSON files
-- Use proper status indicators (▸, [ ], [x])
-
-**Step 5: Update Session State**
-- Update .workflow/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
-- Mark session as ready for execution
-- Record task count and artifact inventory
-
-### MCP Enhancement Examples
-
-**Code Index Usage**:
-\`\`\`javascript
-// Discover authentication-related files
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*auth*")
-
-// Search for OAuth patterns
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-  pattern="oauth|jwt|authentication",
-  file_pattern="*.{ts,js}"
-)
-
-// Get file summary for key components
-mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(
-  file_path="src/auth/index.ts"
-)
-\`\`\`
-
-**Exa Research Usage**:
-\`\`\`javascript
-// Get best practices for task implementation
-mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
-  query="TypeScript OAuth2 implementation patterns",
-  tokensNum="dynamic"
-)
-
-// Research specific API usage
-mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
-  query="Express.js JWT middleware examples",
-  tokensNum=5000
-)
-\`\`\`
-
-### Quality Validation
-
-Before completion, verify:
-- [ ] All task JSON files created in .task/ directory
-- [ ] Each task JSON has 5 required fields
-- [ ] Artifact references correctly mapped
-- [ ] Flow control includes artifact loading steps
-- [ ] MCP tool integration added where appropriate
-- [ ] IMPL_PLAN.md follows required structure
-- [ ] TODO_LIST.md matches task JSONs
-- [ ] Dependency graph is acyclic
-- [ ] Task count within limits (≤10)
-- [ ] Session state updated
+**Quality Gates** (Full checklist in action-planning-agent.md):
+- ✓ Quantification requirements enforced (explicit counts, measurable acceptance, exact targets)
+- ✓ Task count ≤10 (hard limit)
+- ✓ Artifact references mapped correctly
+- ✓ MCP tool integration added
+- ✓ Documents follow template structure
 
 ## Output
 
 Generate all three documents and report completion status:
 - Task JSON files created: N files
-- Artifacts integrated: synthesis-spec, topic-framework, N role analyses
+- Artifacts integrated: synthesis-spec, guidance-specification, N role analyses
 - MCP enhancements: code-index, exa-research
 - Session ready for execution: /workflow:execute
 `
 )
 ```
 
-## Command Integration
-
-### Usage
-```bash
-# Basic usage
-/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
-
-# Called by /workflow:plan
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-[id]")
-```
 
 ### Agent Context Passing
 
@@ -607,36 +233,26 @@ const agentContext = {
     ? memory.get("workflow-session.json")
     : Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/workflow-session.json),
 
-  analysis_results: memory.has("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
-    ? memory.get("ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
-    : Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md),
-
-  artifacts_inventory: memory.has("artifacts_inventory")
-    ? memory.get("artifacts_inventory")
-    : discoverArtifacts(),
+  context_package_path: ".workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json",
 
   context_package: memory.has("context-package.json")
     ? memory.get("context-package.json")
-    : Read(.workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json),
+    : Read(".workflow/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json"),
+
+  // Extract brainstorm artifacts from context package
+  brainstorm_artifacts: extractBrainstormArtifacts(context_package),
+
+  // Load role analyses using paths from context package
+  role_analyses: brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses
+    .flatMap(role => role.files)
+    .map(file => Read(file.path)),
+
+  // Load conflict resolution if exists (from context package)
+  conflict_resolution: brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution?.exists
+    ? Read(brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
+    : null,
 
   // Optional MCP enhancements
   mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
 }
 ```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates planning and calls this command
-- `/workflow:tools:task-generate` - Manual version without agent
-- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package
-- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides analysis results
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks
-
-## Key Differences from task-generate
-
-| Feature | task-generate | task-generate-agent |
-|---------|--------------|-------------------|
-| Execution | Manual/scripted | Agent-driven |
-| Phases | 6 phases | 2 phases (discovery + output) |
-| MCP Integration | Optional | Enhanced with examples |
-| Decision Logic | Command-driven | Agent-autonomous |
-| Complexity | Higher control | Simpler delegation |

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
----
+--- 
 name: task-generate
-description: Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with artifacts integration
+description: Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results using action-planning-agent with artifact integration
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--cli-execute]"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
@@ -9,321 +9,360 @@ examples:
 
 # Task Generation Command
 
-## Overview
-Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results with automatic artifact detection and integration.
+## 1. Overview
+This command generates task JSON files and an `IMPL_PLAN.md` from brainstorming role analyses. It automatically detects and integrates all brainstorming artifacts (role-specific `analysis.md` files and `guidance-specification.md`), creating a structured and context-rich plan for implementation. The command supports two primary execution modes: a default agent-based mode for seamless context handling and a `--cli-execute` mode that leverages the Codex CLI for complex, autonomous development tasks. Its core function is to translate requirements and design specifications from role analyses into actionable, executable tasks, ensuring all necessary context, dependencies, and implementation steps are defined upfront.
 
-## Execution Modes
+## 2. Execution Modes
+
+This command offers two distinct modes for task execution, providing flexibility for different implementation complexities.
 
 ### Agent Mode (Default)
-Tasks execute within agent context using agent's capabilities:
-- Agent reads synthesis specifications
-- Agent implements following requirements
-- Agent validates implementation
-- **Benefit**: Seamless context within single agent execution
+In the default mode, each step in `implementation_approach` **omits the `command` field**. The agent interprets the step's `modification_points` and `logic_flow` to execute the task autonomously.
+- **Step Structure**: Contains `step`, `title`, `description`, `modification_points`, `logic_flow`, `depends_on`, and `output` fields
+- **Execution**: Agent reads these fields and performs the implementation autonomously
+- **Context Loading**: Agent loads context via `pre_analysis` steps
+- **Validation**: Agent validates against acceptance criteria in `context.acceptance`
+- **Benefit**: Direct agent execution with full context awareness, no external tool overhead
+- **Use Case**: Standard implementation tasks where agent capability is sufficient
 
 ### CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`)
-Tasks execute using Codex CLI with resume mechanism:
-- Each task uses `codex exec` command in `implementation_approach`
-- First task establishes Codex session
-- Subsequent tasks use `codex exec "..." resume --last` for context continuity
-- **Benefit**: Codex's autonomous development capabilities with persistent context
-- **Use Case**: Complex implementation requiring Codex's reasoning and iteration
+When the `--cli-execute` flag is used, each step in `implementation_approach` **includes a `command` field** that specifies the exact execution command. This mode is designed for complex implementations requiring specialized CLI tools.
+- **Step Structure**: Includes all default fields PLUS a `command` field
+- **Execution**: The specified command executes the step directly (e.g., `bash(codex ...)`)
+- **Context Packages**: Each command receives context via the CONTEXT field in the prompt
+- **Multi-Step Support**: Complex tasks can have multiple sequential codex steps with `resume --last`
+- **Benefit**: Leverages specialized CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen) for complex reasoning and autonomous execution
+- **Use Case**: Large-scale features, complex refactoring, or when user explicitly requests CLI tool usage
 
-## Core Philosophy
-- **Analysis-Driven**: Generate from ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- **Artifact-Aware**: Auto-detect brainstorming outputs
-- **Context-Rich**: Embed comprehensive context in task JSON
-- **Flow-Control Ready**: Pre-define implementation steps
-- **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from memory
-- **CLI-Aware**: Support Codex resume mechanism for persistent context
+## 3. Core Principles
+This command is built on a set of core principles to ensure efficient and reliable task generation.
 
-## Core Responsibilities
-- Parse analysis results and extract tasks
-- Detect and integrate brainstorming artifacts
-- Generate enhanced task JSON files (5-field schema)
-- Create IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
-- Update session state for execution
+- **Role Analysis-Driven**: All generated tasks originate from role-specific `analysis.md` files (enhanced in synthesis phase), ensuring direct link between requirements/design and implementation
+- **Artifact-Aware**: Automatically detects and integrates all brainstorming outputs (role analyses, guidance-specification.md, enhancements) to enrich task context
+- **Context-Rich**: Embeds comprehensive context (requirements, focus paths, acceptance criteria, artifact references) directly into each task JSON
+- **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root (e.g., `./src/module`)
+- **Flow-Control Ready**: Pre-defines clear execution sequence (`pre_analysis`, `implementation_approach`) within each task
+- **Memory-First**: Prioritizes using documents already loaded in conversation memory to avoid redundant file operations
+- **Mode-Flexible**: Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution (with `--cli-execute` flag)
+- **Multi-Step Support**: Complex tasks can use multiple sequential steps in `implementation_approach` with codex resume mechanism
+- **Quantification-Enforced**: **NEW** - All requirements, acceptance criteria, and modification points MUST include explicit counts and enumerations to prevent ambiguity (e.g., "17 commands: [list]" not "implement commands")
+- **Responsibility**: Parses analysis, detects artifacts, generates enhanced task JSONs, creates `IMPL_PLAN.md` and `TODO_LIST.md`, updates session state
 
-## Execution Lifecycle
+## 3.5. Quantification Requirements (MANDATORY)
 
-### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
-**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
+**Purpose**: Eliminate ambiguity by enforcing explicit counts and enumerations in all task specifications.
 
-1. **Session Validation**
-   - If session metadata in memory → Skip loading
-   - Else: Load `.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`
+**Core Rules**:
+1. **Extract Counts from Analysis**: Search for HOW MANY items and list them explicitly
+2. **Enforce Explicit Lists**: Every deliverable uses format `{count} {type}: [{explicit_list}]`
+3. **Make Acceptance Measurable**: Include verification commands (e.g., `ls ... | wc -l = N`)
+4. **Quantify Modification Points**: Specify exact targets (files, functions with line numbers)
+5. **Avoid Vague Language**: Replace "complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize" with quantified statements
 
-2. **Analysis Results Loading**
-   - If ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md in memory → Skip loading
-   - Else: Read `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+**Standard Formats**:
 
-3. **Artifact Discovery**
-   - If artifact inventory in memory → Skip scanning
-   - Else: Scan `.workflow/{session_id}/.brainstorming/` directory
-   - Detect: synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses
+- **Requirements**: `"Implement N items: [item1, item2, ...]"` or `"Modify N files: [file1:func:lines, ...]"`
+- **Acceptance**: `"N items exist: verify by [command]"` or `"Coverage >= X%: verify by [test command]"`
+- **Modification Points**: `"Create N files: [list]"` or `"Modify N functions: [func() in file lines X-Y]"`
 
-### Phase 2: Task JSON Generation
+**Validation Checklist**:
+- [ ] Every requirement contains explicit count or enumerated list
+- [ ] Every acceptance criterion is measurable with verification command
+- [ ] Every modification_point specifies exact targets (files/functions/lines)
+- [ ] No vague language ("complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize" without counts)
+- [ ] Each implementation step has its own acceptance criteria
 
-#### Task Decomposition Standards
-**Core Principle: Task Merging Over Decomposition**
-- **Merge Rule**: Execute together when possible
-- **Decompose Only When**:
-  - Excessive workload (>2500 lines or >6 files)
-  - Different tech stacks or domains
-  - Sequential dependency blocking
-  - Parallel execution needed
+## 4. Execution Flow
+The command follows a streamlined, three-step process to convert analysis into executable tasks.
 
+### Step 1: Input & Discovery
+The process begins by gathering all necessary inputs. It follows a **Memory-First Rule**, skipping file reads if documents are already in the conversation memory.
+1.  **Session Validation**: Loads and validates the session from `.workflow/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`.
+2.  **Context Package Loading** (primary source): Reads `.workflow/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json` for smart context and artifact catalog.
+3.  **Brainstorm Artifacts Extraction**: Extracts role analysis paths from `context-package.json` → `brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[]` (supports `analysis*.md` automatically).
+4.  **Document Loading**: Reads role analyses, guidance specification, synthesis output, and conflict resolution (if exists) using paths from context package.
+
+### Step 2: Task Decomposition & Grouping
+Once all inputs are loaded, the command analyzes the tasks defined in the analysis results and groups them based on shared context.
+
+**Phase 2.1: Quantification Extraction (NEW - CRITICAL)**
+1. **Count Extraction**: Scan analysis documents for quantifiable information:
+   - Search for numbers + nouns (e.g., "5 files", "17 commands", "3 features")
+   - Identify enumerated lists (bullet points, numbered lists, comma-separated items)
+   - Extract explicit counts from tables, diagrams, or structured data
+   - Store extracted counts with their context (what is being counted)
+
+2. **List Enumeration**: Build explicit lists for each deliverable:
+   - If analysis says "implement session commands", enumerate ALL commands: [start, resume, list, complete, archive]
+   - If analysis mentions "create categories", list ALL categories: [literature, experiment, data-analysis, visualization, context]
+   - If analysis describes "modify functions", list ALL functions with line numbers
+   - Maintain full enumerations (no "..." unless list exceeds 20 items)
+
+3. **Verification Method Assignment**: For each deliverable, determine verification approach:
+   - File count: `ls {path}/*.{ext} | wc -l = {count}`
+   - Directory existence: `ls {parent}/ | grep -E '(name1|name2|...)' | wc -l = {count}`
+   - Test coverage: `pytest --cov={module} --cov-report=term | grep TOTAL | awk '{print $4}' >= {percentage}`
+   - Function existence: `grep -E '(func1|func2|...)' {file} | wc -l = {count}`
+
+4. **Ambiguity Detection**: Flag vague language for replacement:
+   - Detect words: "complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize", "refactor", "implement", "create" without counts
+   - Require quantification: "implement" → "implement {N} {items}: [{list}]"
+   - Reject unquantified deliverables
+
+**Phase 2.2: Task Definition & Grouping**
+1.  **Task Definition Parsing**: Extracts task definitions, requirements, and dependencies from quantified analysis
+2.  **Context Signature Analysis**: Computes a unique hash (`context_signature`) for each task based on its `focus_paths` and referenced `artifacts`
+3.  **Task Grouping**:
+    *   Tasks with the **same signature** are candidates for merging, as they operate on the same context
+    *   Tasks with **different signatures** and no dependencies are grouped for parallel execution
+    *   Tasks with `depends_on` relationships are marked for sequential execution
+4.  **Modification Target Determination**: Extracts specific code locations (`file:function:lines`) from the analysis to populate the `target_files` field
+
+### Step 3: Output Generation
+Finally, the command generates all the necessary output files.
+1.  **Task JSON Creation**: Creates individual `.task/IMPL-*.json` files, embedding all context, artifacts, and flow control steps. If `--cli-execute` is active, it generates the appropriate `codex exec` commands.
+2.  **IMPL_PLAN.md Generation**: Creates the main implementation plan document, summarizing the strategy, tasks, and dependencies.
+3.  **TODO_LIST.md Generation**: Creates a simple checklist for tracking task progress.
+4.  **Session State Update**: Updates `workflow-session.json` with the final task count and artifact inventory, marking the session as ready for execution.
+
+## 5. Task Decomposition Strategy
+The command employs a sophisticated strategy to group and decompose tasks, optimizing for context reuse and parallel execution.
+
+### Core Principles
+- **Primary Rule: Shared Context → Merge Tasks**: Tasks that operate on the same files, use the same artifacts, and share the same tech stack are merged. This avoids redundant context loading and recognizes inherent relationships between the tasks.
+- **Secondary Rule: Different Contexts + No Dependencies → Decompose for Parallel Execution**: Tasks that are fully independent (different files, different artifacts, no shared dependencies) are decomposed into separate parallel execution groups.
+
+### Context Analysis for Task Grouping
+The decision to merge or decompose is based on analyzing context indicators:
+
+1.  **Shared Context Indicators (→ Merge)**:
+    *   Identical `focus_paths` (working on the same modules/files).
+    *   Same tech stack and dependencies.
+    *   Identical `context.artifacts` references.
+    *   A sequential logic flow within the same feature.
+    *   Shared test fixtures or setup.
+
+2.  **Independent Context Indicators (→ Decompose)**:
+    *   Different `focus_paths` (separate modules).
+    *   Different tech stacks (e.g., frontend vs. backend).
+    *   Different `context.artifacts` (using different brainstorming outputs).
+    *   No shared dependencies.
+    *   Can be tested independently.
+
+**Decomposition is only performed when**:
+- Tasks have different contexts and no shared dependencies (enabling parallel execution).
+- A single task represents an excessive workload (e.g., >2500 lines of code or >6 files to modify).
+- A sequential dependency creates a necessary block (e.g., IMPL-1 must complete before IMPL-2 can start).
+
+### Context Signature Algorithm
+To automate grouping, a `context_signature` is computed for each task.
+
+```javascript
+// Compute context signature for task grouping
+function computeContextSignature(task) {
+  const focusPathsStr = task.context.focus_paths.sort().join('|');
+  const artifactsStr = task.context.artifacts.map(a => a.path).sort().join('|');
+  const techStack = task.context.shared_context?.tech_stack?.sort().join('|') || '';
+
+  return hash(`${focusPathsStr}:${artifactsStr}:${techStack}`);
+}
+```
+
+### Execution Group Assignment
+Tasks are assigned to execution groups based on their signatures and dependencies.
+
+```javascript
+// Group tasks by context signature
+function groupTasksByContext(tasks) {
+  const groups = {};
+
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    const signature = computeContextSignature(task);
+    if (!groups[signature]) {
+      groups[signature] = [];
+    }
+    groups[signature].push(task);
+  });
+
+  return groups;
+}
+
+// Assign execution groups for parallel tasks
+function assignExecutionGroups(tasks) {
+  const contextGroups = groupTasksByContext(tasks);
+
+  Object.entries(contextGroups).forEach(([signature, groupTasks]) => {
+    if (groupTasks.length === 1) {
+      const task = groupTasks[0];
+      // Single task with unique context
+      if (!task.context.depends_on || task.context.depends_on.length === 0) {
+        task.meta.execution_group = `parallel-${signature.slice(0, 8)}`;
+      } else {
+        task.meta.execution_group = null; // Sequential task
+      }
+    } else {
+      // Multiple tasks with same context → Should be merged
+      console.warn(`Tasks ${groupTasks.map(t => t.id).join(', ')} share context and should be merged`);
+      // Merge tasks into single task
+      return mergeTasks(groupTasks);
+    }
+  });
+}
+```
 **Task Limits**:
-- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit)
-- **Function-based**: Complete units (logic + UI + tests + config)
-- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5) | Two-level (6-10) | Re-scope (>10)
+- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit).
+- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5 tasks) or two-level (6-10 tasks). If >10, the scope should be re-evaluated.
+- **Parallel Groups**: Tasks with the same `execution_group` ID are independent and can run concurrently.
 
-#### Enhanced Task JSON Schema (5-Field + Artifacts)
+## 6. Generated Outputs
+The command produces three key documents and a directory of task files.
+
+### 6.1. Task JSON Schema (`.task/IMPL-*.json`)
+Each task JSON embeds all necessary context, artifacts, and execution steps using this schema:
+
+**Top-Level Fields**:
+- `id`: Task identifier (format: `IMPL-N` or `IMPL-N.M` for subtasks)
+- `title`: Descriptive task name
+- `status`: Task state (`pending|active|completed|blocked|container`)
+- `context_package_path`: Path to context package (`.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/context-package.json`)
+- `meta`: Task metadata
+- `context`: Task-specific context and requirements
+- `flow_control`: Execution steps and workflow
+
+**Meta Object**:
+- `type`: Task category (`feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs`)
+- `agent`: Assigned agent (`@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@universal-executor`)
+- `execution_group`: Parallelization group ID or null
+- `context_signature`: Hash for context-based grouping
+
+**Context Object**:
+- `requirements`: Quantified implementation requirements (with counts and explicit lists)
+- `focus_paths`: Target directories/files (absolute or relative paths)
+- `acceptance`: Measurable acceptance criteria (with verification commands)
+- `parent`: Parent task ID for subtasks
+- `depends_on`: Prerequisite task IDs
+- `inherited`: Shared patterns and dependencies from parent
+- `shared_context`: Tech stack and conventions
+- `artifacts`: Referenced brainstorm artifacts with paths, priority, and usage
+
+**Flow Control Object**:
+- `pre_analysis`: Context loading and preparation steps
+  - `load_context_package`: Load smart context and artifact catalog
+  - `load_role_analysis_artifacts`: Load role analyses dynamically from context package
+  - `load_planning_context`: Load finalized decisions with resolved conflicts
+  - `codebase_exploration`: Discover existing patterns
+  - `analyze_task_patterns`: Identify modification targets
+- `implementation_approach`: Execution steps
+  - **Agent Mode**: Steps contain `modification_points` and `logic_flow` (agent executes autonomously)
+  - **CLI Mode**: Steps include `command` field with CLI tool invocation
+- `target_files`: Specific files/functions/lines to modify
+
+**Key Characteristics**:
+- **Quantification**: All requirements/acceptance use explicit counts and enumerations
+- **Mode Flexibility**: Supports both agent execution (default) and CLI tool execution (`--cli-execute`)
+- **Context Intelligence**: References context-package.json for smart context and artifact paths
+- **Artifact Integration**: Dynamically loads role analyses and brainstorm artifacts
+
+**Example Task JSON**:
 ```json
 {
-  "id": "IMPL-N[.M]",
-  "title": "Descriptive task name",
-  "status": "pending|active|completed|blocked|container",
+  "id": "IMPL-1",
+  "title": "Implement feature X with Y components",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "context_package_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.process/context-package.json",
   "meta": {
-    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
-    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
+    "type": "feature",
+    "agent": "@code-developer",
+    "execution_group": "parallel-abc123",
+    "context_signature": "hash-value"
   },
   "context": {
-    "requirements": ["Clear requirement from analysis"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/module/path", "tests/module/path"],
-    "acceptance": ["Measurable acceptance criterion"],
-    "parent": "IMPL-N",
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-N.M"],
-    "inherited": {"shared_patterns": [], "common_dependencies": []},
-    "shared_context": {"tech_stack": [], "conventions": []},
+    "requirements": [
+      "Implement 5 commands: [cmd1, cmd2, cmd3, cmd4, cmd5]",
+      "Create 3 directories: [dir1/, dir2/, dir3/]",
+      "Modify 2 functions: [funcA() in file1.ts lines 10-25, funcB() in file2.ts lines 40-60]"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["D:\\project\\src\\module", "./tests/module"],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "5 command files created: verify by ls .claude/commands/*/*.md | wc -l = 5",
+      "3 directories exist: verify by ls -d dir*/ | wc -l = 3",
+      "All tests pass: pytest tests/ --cov=src/module (>=80% coverage)"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": [],
     "artifacts": [
       {
-        "type": "synthesis_specification",
-        "source": "brainstorm_synthesis",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+        "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md",
         "priority": "highest",
-        "usage": "Primary requirement source - use for consolidated requirements and cross-role alignment"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "role_analysis",
-        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role-name]/analysis.md",
-        "priority": "high",
-        "usage": "Technical/design/business details from specific roles. Common roles: system-architect (ADRs, APIs, caching), ui-designer (design tokens, layouts), product-manager (user stories, metrics)",
-        "note": "Dynamically discovered - multiple role analysis files may be included based on brainstorming results"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "topic_framework",
-        "source": "brainstorm_framework",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md",
-        "priority": "low",
-        "usage": "Discussion context and framework structure"
+        "usage": "Architecture decisions and API specifications"
       }
     ]
   },
   "flow_control": {
     "pre_analysis": [
       {
-        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
-        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(ls .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'not found')",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
+        "step": "load_context_package",
+        "action": "Load context package for artifact paths and smart context",
+        "commands": ["Read({{context_package_path}})"],
+        "output_to": "context_package",
+        "on_error": "fail"
       },
       {
         "step": "load_role_analysis_artifacts",
-        "action": "Load role-specific analysis documents for technical details",
-        "note": "These artifacts contain implementation details not in synthesis. Consult when needing: API schemas, caching configs, design tokens, ADRs, performance metrics.",
+        "action": "Load role analyses from context-package.json",
         "commands": [
-          "bash(find .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/ -name 'analysis.md' 2>/dev/null | head -8)",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md)",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md)",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md)"
+          "Read({{context_package_path}})",
+          "Extract(brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path)",
+          "Read(each extracted path)"
         ],
         "output_to": "role_analysis_artifacts",
         "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_planning_context",
-        "action": "Load plan-generated analysis",
-        "commands": [
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.process/context-package.json)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "planning_context"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "mcp_codebase_exploration",
-        "action": "Explore codebase using MCP tools",
-        "command": "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"[patterns]\") && mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"[patterns]\")",
-        "output_to": "codebase_structure"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_task_patterns",
-        "action": "Analyze existing code patterns and identify modification targets",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(cd \"[focus_paths]\")",
-          "bash(~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Identify modification targets TASK: Analyze '[title]' and locate specific files/functions/lines to modify CONTEXT: [synthesis_specification] [individual_artifacts] EXPECTED: Code locations in format 'file:function:lines' RULES: Prioritize synthesis-specification.md, identify exact modification points\")"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "task_context_with_targets",
-        "on_error": "fail"
       }
     ],
     "implementation_approach": [
       {
         "step": 1,
-        "title": "Implement task following synthesis specification",
-        "description": "Implement '[title]' following synthesis specification. PRIORITY: Use synthesis-specification.md as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
+        "title": "Implement feature following role analyses",
+        "description": "Implement feature X using requirements from role analyses and context package",
         "modification_points": [
-          "Apply consolidated requirements from synthesis-specification.md",
-          "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
-          "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
-          "Integrate with existing patterns"
+          "Create 5 command files: [cmd1.md, cmd2.md, cmd3.md, cmd4.md, cmd5.md]",
+          "Modify funcA() in file1.ts lines 10-25: add validation logic",
+          "Modify funcB() in file2.ts lines 40-60: integrate with new API"
         ],
         "logic_flow": [
-          "Load synthesis specification",
-          "Extract requirements and design",
-          "Analyze existing patterns",
-          "Implement following specification",
-          "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
+          "Load role analyses and context package",
+          "Extract requirements and design decisions",
+          "Implement commands following existing patterns",
+          "Update functions with new logic",
           "Validate against acceptance criteria"
         ],
         "depends_on": [],
         "output": "implementation"
       }
     ],
-
-    // CLI Execute Mode: Use Codex command (when --cli-execute flag present)
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
-        "description": "Use Codex CLI to implement '[title]' following synthesis specification with autonomous development capabilities",
-        "modification_points": [
-          "Codex loads synthesis specification and artifacts",
-          "Codex implements following requirements",
-          "Codex validates and tests implementation"
-        ],
-        "logic_flow": [
-          "Establish or resume Codex session",
-          "Pass synthesis specification to Codex",
-          "Codex performs autonomous implementation",
-          "Codex validates against acceptance criteria"
-        ],
-        "command": "bash(codex -C [focus_paths] --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: [title] TASK: [requirements] MODE: auto CONTEXT: @{[synthesis_path],[artifacts_paths]} EXPECTED: [acceptance] RULES: Follow synthesis-specification.md\" [resume_flag] --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "implementation"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": ["file:function:lines"]
+    "target_files": ["file1.ts:funcA:10-25", "file2.ts:funcB:40-60"]
   }
 }
 ```
 
-#### Task Generation Process
-1. Parse analysis results and extract task definitions
-2. Detect brainstorming artifacts with priority scoring
-3. Generate task context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance)
-4. **Determine modification targets**: Extract specific code locations from analysis
-5. Build flow_control with artifact loading steps and target_files
-6. **CLI Execute Mode**: If `--cli-execute` flag present, generate Codex commands
-7. Create individual task JSON files in `.task/`
+**Note**: In CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`), `implementation_approach` steps include a `command` field with the CLI tool invocation (e.g., `bash(codex ...)`).
 
-#### Codex Resume Mechanism (CLI Execute Mode)
+### 6.2. IMPL_PLAN.md Structure
+This document provides a high-level overview of the entire implementation plan.
 
-**Session Continuity Strategy**:
-- **First Task** (no depends_on or depends_on=[]): Establish new Codex session
-  - Command: `codex -C [path] --full-auto exec "[prompt]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
-  - Creates new session context
-
-- **Subsequent Tasks** (has depends_on): Resume previous Codex session
-  - Command: `codex --full-auto exec "[prompt]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
-  - Maintains context from previous implementation
-  - **Critical**: `resume --last` flag enables context continuity
-
-**Resume Flag Logic**:
-```javascript
-// Determine resume flag based on task dependencies
-const resumeFlag = task.context.depends_on && task.context.depends_on.length > 0
-  ? "resume --last"
-  : "";
-
-// First task (IMPL-001): no resume flag
-// Later tasks (IMPL-002, IMPL-003): use "resume --last"
-```
-
-**Benefits**:
-- ✅ Shared context across related tasks
-- ✅ Codex learns from previous implementations
-- ✅ Consistent patterns and conventions
-- ✅ Reduced redundant analysis
-
-#### Target Files Generation (Critical)
-**Purpose**: Identify specific code locations for modification AND new files to create
-
-**Source Data Priority**:
-1. **ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md** - Should contain identified code locations
-2. **Gemini/MCP Analysis** - From `analyze_task_patterns` step
-3. **Context Package** - File references from `focus_paths`
-
-**Format**: `["file:function:lines"]` or `["file"]` (for new files)
-- `file`: Relative path from project root (e.g., `src/auth/AuthService.ts`)
-- `function`: Function/method name to modify (e.g., `login`, `validateToken`) - **omit for new files**
-- `lines`: Approximate line range (e.g., `45-52`, `120-135`) - **omit for new files**
-
-**Examples**:
-```json
-"target_files": [
-  "src/auth/AuthService.ts:login:45-52",
-  "src/middleware/auth.ts:validateToken:30-45",
-  "src/auth/PasswordReset.ts",
-  "tests/auth/PasswordReset.test.ts",
-  "tests/auth.test.ts:testLogin:15-20"
-]
-```
-
-**Generation Strategy**:
-- **New files to create** → Use `["path/to/NewFile.ts"]` (no function or lines)
-- **Existing files with specific locations** → Use `["file:function:lines"]`
-- **Existing files with function only** → Search lines using MCP/grep `["file:function:*"]`
-- **Existing files (explore entire)** → Mark as `["file.ts:*:*"]`
-- **No specific targets** → Leave empty `[]` (agent explores focus_paths)
-
-### Phase 3: Artifact Detection & Integration
-
-#### Artifact Priority
-1. **synthesis-specification.md** (highest) - Complete integrated spec
-2. **topic-framework.md** (medium) - Discussion framework
-3. **role/analysis.md** (low) - Individual perspectives
-
-#### Artifact-Task Mapping
-- **synthesis-specification.md** → All tasks
-- **ui-designer/analysis.md** → UI/Frontend tasks
-- **ux-expert/analysis.md** → UX/Interaction tasks
-- **system-architect/analysis.md** → Architecture/Backend tasks
-- **subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** → Domain/Standards tasks
-- **data-architect/analysis.md** → Data/API tasks
-- **scrum-master/analysis.md** → Sprint/Process tasks
-- **product-owner/analysis.md** → Backlog/Story tasks
-
-### Phase 4: IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
-
-#### Document Structure
 ```markdown
 ---
 identifier: WFS-{session-id}
 source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
-analysis: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+role_analyses: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis*.md
 artifacts: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/
 context_package: .workflow/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
+guidance_specification: .workflow/{session-id}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md  # Finalized decisions with resolved conflicts
 workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design"  # Indicates execution model
 verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
-  concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"
+  synthesis_clarify: "passed | skipped | pending"  # Brainstorm phase clarification
   action_plan_verify: "pending"
-phase_progression: "brainstorm → context → analysis → concept_verify → planning"  # CCW workflow phases
+  conflict_resolution: "resolved | none | low"  # Status from context-package.json
+phase_progression: "brainstorm → synthesis → context → conflict_resolution (if needed) → planning"  # CCW workflow phases
 ---
 
 # Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
@@ -342,14 +381,14 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 
 ### CCW Workflow Context
 **Phase Progression**:
-- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (synthesis-specification.md generated)
-- ✅ Phase 2: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed)
-- ✅ Phase 3: Enhanced Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel insights)
-- ✅ Phase 4: Concept Verification ({X} clarifications answered, synthesis updated | skipped)
-- ⏳ Phase 5: Action Planning (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md)
+- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (role analyses generated by participating roles)
+- ✅ Phase 2: Synthesis (concept enhancement + clarification, {N} questions answered, role analyses refined)
+- ✅ Phase 3: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed, conflict_risk: {level})
+- ✅ Phase 4: Conflict Resolution ({status}: {conflict_count} conflicts detected and resolved | skipped if no conflicts)
+- ⏳ Phase 5: Task Generation (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs)
 
 **Quality Gates**:
-- concept-verify: ✅ Passed (0 ambiguities remaining) | ⏭️ Skipped (user decision) | ⏳ Pending
+- synthesis-clarify: ✅ Passed ({N} ambiguities resolved, {M} enhancements applied)
 - action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
 
 **Context Package Summary**:
@@ -365,9 +404,9 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 - **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
 
 ### Module Structure
-```
+'''
 [Directory tree showing key modules]
-```
+'''
 
 ### Dependencies
 **Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
@@ -383,40 +422,42 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 ## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
 
 ### Artifact Usage Strategy
-**Primary Reference (synthesis-specification.md)**:
-- **What**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint from multi-role synthesis
-- **When**: Every task references this first for requirements and design decisions
-- **How**: Extract architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns, functional requirements, non-functional requirements
-- **Priority**: Authoritative - overrides role-specific analyses when conflicts arise
-- **CCW Value**: Consolidates insights from all brainstorming roles into single source of truth
+**Primary Reference (Role Analyses)**:
+- **What**: Role-specific analyses from brainstorming phase providing multi-perspective insights
+- **When**: Every task references relevant role analyses for requirements and design decisions
+- **How**: Extract requirements, architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns from applicable role documents
+- **Priority**: Collective authoritative source - multiple role perspectives provide comprehensive coverage
+- **CCW Value**: Maintains role-specific expertise while enabling cross-role integration during planning
 
 **Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
 - **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
-- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure
-- **Usage**: Tasks load this via `flow_control.preparatory_steps` for environment setup
+- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure, tech stack, conflict_risk status
+- **Usage**: Tasks load this via `flow_control.preparatory_steps` for environment setup and conflict awareness
 - **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
 
-**Technical Analysis (ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)**:
-- **What**: Gemini/Qwen/Codex parallel analysis results
-- **Content**: Optimization strategies, risk assessment, architecture review, implementation patterns
-- **Usage**: Referenced in task planning for technical guidance and risk mitigation
-- **CCW Value**: Multi-model parallel analysis providing comprehensive technical intelligence
+**Conflict Resolution Status**:
+- **What**: Conflict resolution applied in-place to brainstorm artifacts (if conflict_risk was >= medium)
+- **Location**: guidance-specification.md and role analyses (*.md) contain resolved conflicts
+- **Status**: Check context-package.json → conflict_detection.conflict_risk ("resolved" | "none" | "low")
+- **Usage**: Read finalized decisions from guidance-specification.md (includes applied resolutions)
+- **CCW Value**: Interactive conflict resolution with user confirmation, modifications applied automatically
 
-### Integrated Specifications (Highest Priority)
-- **synthesis-specification.md**: Comprehensive implementation blueprint
-  - Contains: Architecture design, UI/UX guidelines, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation roadmap, risk assessment
+### Role Analysis Documents (Highest Priority)
+Role analyses provide specialized perspectives on the implementation:
+- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Architecture design, ADRs, API specifications, caching strategies
+- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Design tokens, layout specifications, component patterns
+- **ux-expert/analysis.md**: User journeys, interaction flows, accessibility requirements
+- **guidance-specification/analysis.md**: Product vision, user stories, business requirements, success metrics
+- **data-architect/analysis.md**: Data models, schemas, database design, migration strategies
+- **api-designer/analysis.md**: API contracts, endpoint specifications, integration patterns
 
 ### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
 - **topic-framework.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
-- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Detailed architecture specifications
-- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Layout and component specifications
-- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Product vision and user stories
 
 **Artifact Priority in Development**:
-1. synthesis-specification.md (primary reference for all tasks)
-2. context-package.json (smart context for execution environment)
-3. ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (technical analysis and optimization strategies)
-4. Role-specific analyses (fallback for detailed specifications)
+1. {context_package_path} (primary source: smart context AND brainstorm artifact catalog in `brainstorm_artifacts` + conflict_risk status)
+2. role/analysis*.md (paths from context-package.json: requirements, design specs, enhanced by synthesis, with resolved conflicts if any)
+3. guidance-specification.md (path from context-package.json: finalized decisions with resolved conflicts if any)
 
 ## 4. Implementation Strategy
 
@@ -433,7 +474,7 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 
 ### Architectural Approach
 **Key Architecture Decisions**:
-- [ADR references from synthesis]
+- [ADR references from role analyses]
 - [Justification for architecture patterns]
 
 **Integration Strategy**:
@@ -442,9 +483,9 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 
 ### Key Dependencies
 **Task Dependency Graph**:
-```
+'''
 [High-level dependency visualization]
-```
+'''
 
 **Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
 
@@ -525,7 +566,7 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 ## 8. Success Criteria
 
 **Functional Completeness**:
-- [ ] All requirements from synthesis-specification.md implemented
+- [ ] All requirements from role analysis documents implemented
 - [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
 
 **Technical Quality**:
@@ -539,12 +580,12 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 - [ ] Documentation complete
 
 **Business Metrics**:
-- [ ] [Key business metrics from synthesis]
+- [ ] [Key business metrics from role analyses]
 ```
 
-### Phase 5: TODO_LIST.md Generation
+### 6.3. TODO_LIST.md Structure
+A simple Markdown file for tracking the status of each task.
 
-#### Document Structure
 ```markdown
 # Tasks: [Session Topic]
 
@@ -562,12 +603,8 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 - Maximum 2 levels: Main tasks and subtasks only
 ```
 
-### Phase 6: Session State Update
-1. Update workflow-session.json with task count and artifacts
-2. Validate all output files (task JSONs, IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md)
-3. Generate completion report
-
-## Output Files Structure
+### 6.4. Output Files Diagram
+The command organizes outputs into a standard directory structure.
 ```
 .workflow/{session-id}/
 ├── IMPL_PLAN.md                     # Implementation plan
@@ -576,22 +613,39 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 │   ├── IMPL-1.json                  # Container task
 │   ├── IMPL-1.1.json                # Leaf task with flow_control
 │   └── IMPL-1.2.json                # Leaf task with flow_control
-├── .brainstorming/                  # Input artifacts
-│   ├── synthesis-specification.md
-│   ├── topic-framework.md
-│   └── {role}/analysis.md
+├── .brainstorming              # Input artifacts from brainstorm + synthesis
+│   ├── guidance-specification.md    # Finalized decisions (with resolved conflicts if any)
+│   └── {role}/analysis*.md          # Role analyses (enhanced by synthesis, with resolved conflicts if any)
 └── .process/
-    ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md          # Input from concept-enhanced
-    └── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather
+    └── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather (smart context + conflict_risk status)
 ```
 
-## Error Handling
+## 7. Artifact Integration
+The command intelligently detects and integrates artifacts from the `.brainstorming/` directory.
+
+#### Artifact Priority
+1.  **context-package.json** (critical): Primary source - smart context AND all brainstorm artifact paths in `brainstorm_artifacts` section + conflict_risk status
+2.  **role/analysis*.md** (highest): Paths from context-package.json → role-specific requirements, design specs, enhanced by synthesis, with resolved conflicts applied in-place
+3.  **guidance-specification.md** (high): Path from context-package.json → finalized decisions with resolved conflicts (if conflict_risk was >= medium)
+
+#### Artifact-Task Mapping
+Artifacts are mapped to tasks based on their relevance to the task's domain.
+- **Role analysis.md files**: Primary requirements source - all relevant role analyses included based on task type
+- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Mapped to UI/Frontend tasks for design tokens, layouts, components
+- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Mapped to Architecture/Backend tasks for ADRs, APIs, patterns
+- **subject-matter-expert/analysis.md**: Mapped to tasks related to domain logic or standards
+- **data-architect/analysis.md**: Mapped to tasks involving data models, schemas, or APIs
+- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Mapped to all tasks for business requirements and user stories
+
+This ensures that each task has access to the most relevant and detailed specifications from role-specific analyses.
+
+## 8. Error Handling
 
 ### Input Validation Errors
 | Error | Cause | Resolution |
 |-------|-------|------------|
 | Session not found | Invalid session ID | Verify session exists |
-| Analysis missing | Incomplete planning | Run concept-enhanced first |
+| Context missing | Incomplete planning | Run context-gather first |
 | Invalid format | Corrupted results | Regenerate analysis |
 
 ### Task Generation Errors
@@ -608,94 +662,19 @@ Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
 | Invalid format | Corrupted file | Skip artifact loading |
 | Path invalid | Moved/deleted | Update references |
 
-## Integration & Usage
+## 10. Usage & Related Commands
 
-### Command Chain
-- **Called By**: `/workflow:plan` (Phase 4)
-- **Calls**: None (terminal command)
-- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute`, `/workflow:status`
-
-### Basic Usage
+**Basic Usage**:
 ```bash
-/workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
+/workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth [--cli-execute]
 ```
 
-## CLI Execute Mode Examples
+**Workflow Integration**:
+- Called by: `/workflow:plan` (task generation phase)
+- Followed by: `/workflow:execute`, `/workflow:status`
 
-### Example 1: First Task (Establish Session)
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Implement user authentication module",
-  "context": {
-    "depends_on": [],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
-    "requirements": ["JWT-based authentication", "Login and registration endpoints"]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "implementation_approach": [{
-      "step": 1,
-      "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
-      "command": "bash(codex -C src/auth --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Implement user authentication module TASK: JWT-based authentication with login and registration MODE: auto CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md} EXPECTED: Complete auth module with tests RULES: Follow synthesis specification\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
-      "depends_on": [],
-      "output": "implementation"
-    }]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Example 2: Subsequent Task (Resume Session)
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-002",
-  "title": "Add password reset functionality",
-  "context": {
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
-    "requirements": ["Password reset via email", "Token validation"]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "implementation_approach": [{
-      "step": 1,
-      "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
-      "command": "bash(codex --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Add password reset functionality TASK: Password reset via email with token validation MODE: auto CONTEXT: Previous auth implementation from session EXPECTED: Password reset endpoints with email integration RULES: Maintain consistency with existing auth patterns\" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
-      "depends_on": [],
-      "output": "implementation"
-    }]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Example 3: Third Task (Continue Session)
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-003",
-  "title": "Implement role-based access control",
-  "context": {
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-002"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/auth"],
-    "requirements": ["User roles and permissions", "Middleware for route protection"]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "implementation_approach": [{
-      "step": 1,
-      "title": "Execute implementation with Codex",
-      "command": "bash(codex --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Implement role-based access control TASK: User roles, permissions, and route protection middleware MODE: auto CONTEXT: Existing auth system from session EXPECTED: RBAC system integrated with current auth RULES: Use established patterns from session context\" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
-      "depends_on": [],
-      "output": "implementation"
-    }]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Pattern Summary**:
-- IMPL-001: Fresh start with `-C src/auth` and full prompt
-- IMPL-002: Resume with `resume --last`, references "previous auth implementation"
-- IMPL-003: Resume with `resume --last`, references "existing auth system"
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates entire planning
-- `/workflow:plan --cli-execute` - Planning with CLI execution mode
-- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package
-- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides analysis results
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks
+**Related Commands**:
+- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates entire planning workflow
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package input
+- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Provides conflict resolution (if needed)
+- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/tdd-coverage-analysis.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-coverage-analysis
-description: Analyze test coverage and TDD cycle execution
+description: Analyze test coverage and TDD cycle execution with Red-Green-Refactor compliance verification
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
 allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 ---
@@ -275,7 +275,3 @@ Overall Compliance: 93/100
 Detailed report: .workflow/WFS-auth/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Uses this tool for verification
-- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` - Generates tasks this tool analyzes
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes tasks before analysis

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-concept-enhanced.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: test-concept-enhanced
-description: Analyze test requirements and generate test generation strategy using Gemini
+description: Analyze test requirements and generate test generation strategy using Gemini with test-context package
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id --context path/to/test-context-package.json"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session WFS-test-auth --context .workflow/WFS-test-auth/.process/test-context-package.json
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Specialized analysis tool for test generation workflows that uses Gemini to anal
 
 **Tool Configuration**:
 ```bash
-cd .workflow/{test_session_id}/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+cd .workflow/{test_session_id}/.process && gemini -p "
 PURPOSE: Analyze test coverage gaps and design comprehensive test generation strategy
 TASK: Study implementation context, existing tests, and generate test requirements for missing coverage
 MODE: analysis
@@ -460,8 +460,3 @@ Synthesize Gemini analysis into standardized format:
 - ✅ Execution time < 20 minutes
 - ✅ Output follows existing test conventions
 
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Provides input context
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Consumes analysis results
-- `/workflow:test-gen` - Main test generation workflow

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-context-gather.md

@@ -1,285 +1,188 @@
 ---
 name: test-context-gather
-description: Collect test coverage context and identify files requiring test generation
+description: Collect test coverage context using test-context-search-agent and package into standardized test-context JSON
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-auth
   - /workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-payment
+allowed-tools: Task(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
-# Test Context Gather Command
+# Test Context Gather Command (/workflow:tools:test-context-gather)
 
 ## Overview
-Specialized context collector for test generation workflows that analyzes test coverage, identifies missing tests, and packages implementation context from source sessions.
+
+Orchestrator command that invokes `test-context-search-agent` to gather comprehensive test coverage context for test generation workflows. Generates standardized `test-context-package.json` with coverage analysis, framework detection, and source implementation context.
+
+**Agent**: `test-context-search-agent` (`.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md`)
 
 ## Core Philosophy
-- **Coverage-First**: Analyze existing test coverage before planning
-- **Gap Identification**: Locate implementation files without corresponding tests
+
+- **Agent Delegation**: Delegate all test coverage analysis to `test-context-search-agent` for autonomous execution
+- **Detection-First**: Check for existing test-context-package before executing
+- **Coverage-First**: Analyze existing test coverage before planning new tests
 - **Source Context Loading**: Import implementation summaries from source session
-- **Framework Detection**: Auto-detect test framework and patterns
-- **MCP-Powered**: Leverage code-index tools for precise analysis
+- **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json`
 
-## Core Responsibilities
-- Load source session implementation context
-- Analyze current test coverage using MCP tools
-- Identify files requiring test generation
-- Detect test framework and conventions
-- Package test context for analysis phase
+## Execution Flow
 
-## Execution Lifecycle
+### Step 1: Test-Context-Package Detection
 
-### Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Loading
+**Execute First** - Check if valid package already exists:
 
-1. **Test Session Validation**
-   - Load `.workflow/{test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
-   - Extract `meta.source_session` reference
-   - Validate test session type is "test-gen"
+```javascript
+const testContextPath = `.workflow/${test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json`;
 
-2. **Source Session Context Loading**
-   - Read `.workflow/{source_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
-   - Load implementation summaries from `.workflow/{source_session_id}/.summaries/`
-   - Extract changed files and implementation scope
-   - Identify implementation patterns and tech stack
+if (file_exists(testContextPath)) {
+  const existing = Read(testContextPath);
 
-### Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis (MCP Tools)
-
-1. **Existing Test Discovery**
-   ```bash
-   # Find all test files
-   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")
-   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.spec.*")
-   mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*test_*.py")
-
-   # Search for test patterns
-   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-     pattern="describe|it|test|@Test",
-     file_pattern="*.test.*",
-     context_lines=0
-   )
-   ```
-
-2. **Coverage Gap Analysis**
-   ```bash
-   # For each implementation file from source session
-   # Check if corresponding test file exists
-
-   # Example: src/auth/AuthService.ts -> tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts
-   #          src/utils/validator.py -> tests/test_validator.py
-
-   # Output: List of files without tests
-   ```
-
-3. **Test Statistics**
-   - Count total test files
-   - Count implementation files from source session
-   - Calculate coverage percentage
-   - Identify coverage gaps by module
-
-### Phase 3: Test Framework Detection
-
-1. **Framework Identification**
-   ```bash
-   # Check package.json or requirements.txt
-   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-     pattern="jest|mocha|jasmine|pytest|unittest|rspec",
-     file_pattern="package.json|requirements.txt|Gemfile",
-     context_lines=2
-   )
-
-   # Analyze existing test patterns
-   mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-     pattern="describe\\(|it\\(|test\\(|def test_",
-     file_pattern="*.test.*",
-     context_lines=3
-   )
-   ```
-
-2. **Convention Analysis**
-   - Test file naming patterns (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts)
-   - Test directory structure (tests/ vs __tests__ vs src/**/*.test.*)
-   - Assertion library (expect, assert, should)
-   - Mocking framework (jest.fn, sinon, unittest.mock)
-
-### Phase 4: Context Packaging
-
-Generate `test-context-package.json`:
-
-```json
-{
-  "metadata": {
-    "test_session_id": "WFS-test-auth",
-    "source_session_id": "WFS-auth",
-    "timestamp": "2025-10-04T10:30:00Z",
-    "task_type": "test-generation",
-    "complexity": "medium"
-  },
-  "source_context": {
-    "implementation_summaries": [
-      {
-        "task_id": "IMPL-001",
-        "summary_path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
-        "changed_files": [
-          "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
-          "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
-          "src/middleware/auth.ts"
-        ],
-        "implementation_type": "feature"
-      }
-    ],
-    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "express", "jsonwebtoken"],
-    "project_patterns": {
-      "architecture": "layered",
-      "error_handling": "try-catch with custom errors",
-      "async_pattern": "async/await"
-    }
-  },
-  "test_coverage": {
-    "existing_tests": [
-      "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
-      "tests/middleware/auth.test.ts"
-    ],
-    "missing_tests": [
-      {
-        "implementation_file": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
-        "suggested_test_file": "tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts",
-        "priority": "high",
-        "reason": "New implementation without tests"
-      }
-    ],
-    "coverage_stats": {
-      "total_implementation_files": 3,
-      "files_with_tests": 2,
-      "files_without_tests": 1,
-      "coverage_percentage": 66.7
-    }
-  },
-  "test_framework": {
-    "framework": "jest",
-    "version": "^29.0.0",
-    "test_pattern": "**/*.test.ts",
-    "test_directory": "tests/",
-    "assertion_library": "expect",
-    "mocking_framework": "jest",
-    "conventions": {
-      "file_naming": "*.test.ts",
-      "test_structure": "describe/it blocks",
-      "setup_teardown": "beforeEach/afterEach"
-    }
-  },
-  "assets": [
-    {
-      "type": "implementation_summary",
-      "path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
-      "relevance": "Source implementation context",
-      "priority": "highest"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "existing_test",
-      "path": "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
-      "relevance": "Test pattern reference",
-      "priority": "high"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "source_code",
-      "path": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
-      "relevance": "Implementation requiring tests",
-      "priority": "high"
-    },
-    {
-      "type": "documentation",
-      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
-      "relevance": "Project conventions",
-      "priority": "medium"
-    }
-  ],
-  "focus_areas": [
-    "Generate comprehensive tests for TokenValidator",
-    "Follow existing Jest patterns from AuthService tests",
-    "Cover happy path, error cases, and edge cases",
-    "Include integration tests for middleware"
-  ]
+  // Validate package belongs to current test session
+  if (existing?.metadata?.test_session_id === test_session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid test-context-package found for session:", test_session_id);
+    console.log("📊 Coverage Stats:", existing.test_coverage.coverage_stats);
+    console.log("🧪 Framework:", existing.test_framework.framework);
+    console.log("⚠️  Missing Tests:", existing.test_coverage.missing_tests.length);
+    return existing; // Skip execution, return existing
+  } else {
+    console.warn("⚠️ Invalid test_session_id in existing package, re-generating...");
+  }
 }
 ```
 
-## Output Location
+### Step 2: Invoke Test-Context-Search Agent
 
-```
-.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json
-```
+**Only execute if Step 1 finds no valid package**
 
-## MCP Tools Usage
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="test-context-search-agent",
+  description="Gather test coverage context",
+  prompt=`
+You are executing as test-context-search-agent (.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md).
 
-### File Discovery
-```bash
-# Test files
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.test.*")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.spec.*")
+## Execution Mode
+**PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution
 
-# Implementation files
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.js")
-```
+## Session Information
+- **Test Session ID**: ${test_session_id}
+- **Output Path**: .workflow/${test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json
 
-### Content Search
-```bash
-# Test framework detection
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-  pattern="jest|mocha|pytest",
-  file_pattern="package.json|requirements.txt"
-)
+## Mission
+Execute complete test-context-search-agent workflow for test generation planning:
 
-# Test pattern analysis
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(
-  pattern="describe|it|test",
-  file_pattern="*.test.*",
-  context_lines=2
+### Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Context Loading
+1. **Detection**: Check for existing test-context-package (early exit if valid)
+2. **Test Session Validation**: Load test session metadata, extract source_session reference
+3. **Source Context Loading**: Load source session implementation summaries, changed files, tech stack
+
+### Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis
+Execute coverage discovery:
+- **Track 1**: Existing test discovery (find *.test.*, *.spec.* files)
+- **Track 2**: Coverage gap analysis (match implementation files to test files)
+- **Track 3**: Coverage statistics (calculate percentages, identify gaps by module)
+
+### Phase 3: Framework Detection & Packaging
+1. Framework identification from package.json/requirements.txt
+2. Convention analysis from existing test patterns
+3. Generate and validate test-context-package.json
+
+## Output Requirements
+Complete test-context-package.json with:
+- **metadata**: test_session_id, source_session_id, task_type, complexity
+- **source_context**: implementation_summaries, tech_stack, project_patterns
+- **test_coverage**: existing_tests[], missing_tests[], coverage_stats
+- **test_framework**: framework, version, test_pattern, conventions
+- **assets**: implementation_summary[], existing_test[], source_code[] with priorities
+- **focus_areas**: Test generation guidance based on coverage gaps
+
+## Quality Validation
+Before completion verify:
+- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
+- [ ] Source session context loaded successfully
+- [ ] Test coverage gaps identified
+- [ ] Test framework detected (or marked as 'unknown')
+- [ ] Coverage percentage calculated correctly
+- [ ] Missing tests catalogued with priority
+- [ ] Execution time < 30 seconds (< 60s for large codebases)
+
+Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
+Report completion with coverage statistics.
+`
 )
 ```
 
-### Coverage Analysis
-```bash
-# For each implementation file
-# Check if test exists
-implementation_file="src/auth/AuthService.ts"
-test_file_patterns=(
-  "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts"
-  "src/auth/AuthService.test.ts"
-  "src/auth/__tests__/AuthService.test.ts"
-)
+### Step 3: Output Verification
 
-# Search for test file
-for pattern in "${test_file_patterns[@]}"; do
-  if mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="$pattern") | grep -q .; then
-    echo "✅ Test exists: $pattern"
-    break
-  fi
-done
+After agent completes, verify output:
+
+```javascript
+// Verify file was created
+const outputPath = `.workflow/${test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json`;
+if (!file_exists(outputPath)) {
+  throw new Error("❌ Agent failed to generate test-context-package.json");
+}
+
+// Load and display summary
+const testContext = Read(outputPath);
+console.log("✅ Test context package generated successfully");
+console.log("📊 Coverage:", testContext.test_coverage.coverage_stats.coverage_percentage + "%");
+console.log("⚠️  Tests to generate:", testContext.test_coverage.missing_tests.length);
 ```
 
+## Parameter Reference
+
+| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
+|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
+| `--session` | string | ✅ | Test workflow session ID (e.g., WFS-test-auth) |
+
+## Output Schema
+
+Refer to `test-context-search-agent.md` Phase 3.2 for complete `test-context-package.json` schema.
+
+**Key Sections**:
+- **metadata**: Test session info, source session reference, complexity
+- **source_context**: Implementation summaries with changed files and tech stack
+- **test_coverage**: Existing tests, missing tests with priorities, coverage statistics
+- **test_framework**: Framework name, version, patterns, conventions
+- **assets**: Categorized files with relevance (implementation_summary, existing_test, source_code)
+- **focus_areas**: Test generation guidance based on analysis
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+### Basic Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session WFS-test-auth
+```
+
+### Expected Output
+```
+✅ Valid test-context-package found for session: WFS-test-auth
+📊 Coverage Stats: { total: 3, with_tests: 2, without_tests: 1, percentage: 66.7 }
+🧪 Framework: jest
+⚠️  Missing Tests: 1
+```
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Valid test-context-package.json generated in `.workflow/{test_session_id}/.process/`
+- ✅ Source session context loaded successfully
+- ✅ Test coverage gaps identified (>90% accuracy)
+- ✅ Test framework detected and documented
+- ✅ Execution completes within 30 seconds (60s for large codebases)
+- ✅ All required schema fields present and valid
+- ✅ Coverage statistics calculated correctly
+- ✅ Agent reports completion with statistics
+
 ## Error Handling
 
 | Error | Cause | Resolution |
 |-------|-------|------------|
+| Package validation failed | Invalid test_session_id in existing package | Re-run agent to regenerate |
 | Source session not found | Invalid source_session reference | Verify test session metadata |
 | No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Complete source session first |
-| MCP tools unavailable | MCP not configured | Fallback to bash find/grep |
-| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to specify framework |
-
-## Fallback Strategy (No MCP)
-
-```bash
-# File discovery
-find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | grep -v node_modules
-
-# Framework detection
-grep -r "jest\|mocha\|pytest" package.json requirements.txt 2>/dev/null
-
-# Coverage analysis
-for impl_file in $(cat changed_files.txt); do
-  test_file=$(echo $impl_file | sed 's/src/tests/' | sed 's/\(.*\)\.\(ts\|js\|py\)$/\1.test.\2/')
-  [ ! -f "$test_file" ] && echo "$impl_file → MISSING TEST"
-done
-```
+| Agent execution timeout | Large codebase or slow analysis | Increase timeout, check file access |
+| Missing required fields | Agent incomplete execution | Check agent logs, verify schema compliance |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Agent marks as 'unknown', manual specification needed |
 
 ## Integration
 
@@ -287,23 +190,16 @@ done
 - `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 3: Context Gathering)
 
 ### Calls
-- MCP code-index tools for analysis
-- Bash file operations for fallback
+- `test-context-search-agent` - Autonomous test coverage analysis
 
 ### Followed By
-- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Analyzes context and plans test generation
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis and planning
 
-## Success Criteria
+## Notes
 
-- ✅ Source session context loaded successfully
-- ✅ Test coverage gaps identified with MCP tools
-- ✅ Test framework detected and documented
-- ✅ Valid test-context-package.json generated
-- ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
-- ✅ Execution time < 20 seconds
+- **Detection-first**: Always check for existing test-context-package before invoking agent
+- **Agent autonomy**: Agent handles all coverage analysis logic per `.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md`
+- **No redundancy**: This command is a thin orchestrator, all logic in agent
+- **Framework agnostic**: Supports Jest, Mocha, pytest, RSpec, Go testing, etc.
+- **Coverage focus**: Primary goal is identifying implementation files without tests
 
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/workflow:test-gen` - Main test generation workflow
-- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Test task JSON generation

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: test-task-generate
-description: Generate test-fix task JSON with iterative test-fix-retest cycle specification
+description: Autonomous test-fix task generation using action-planning-agent with test-fix-retest cycle specification and discovery phase
 argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session WFS-test-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
@@ -9,10 +9,23 @@ examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
 ---
 
-# Test Task Generation Command
+# Autonomous Test Task Generation Command
 
 ## Overview
-Generate specialized test-fix task JSON with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle specification, including Gemini diagnosis (using bug-fix template) and manual fix workflow (Codex automation only when explicitly requested).
+Autonomous test-fix task JSON generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation. Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution modes. Generates specialized test-fix tasks with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle specification.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+- **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
+- **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
+- **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
+- **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and test research
+- **Pre-Selected Templates**: Command selects correct test template based on `--cli-execute` flag **before** invoking agent
+- **Agent Simplicity**: Agent receives pre-selected template and focuses only on content generation
+- **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root
+- **Test-First**: Generate comprehensive test coverage before execution
+- **Iterative Refinement**: Test-fix-retest cycle until all tests pass
+- **Surgical Fixes**: Minimal code changes, no refactoring during test fixes
+- **Auto-Revert**: Rollback all changes if max iterations reached
 
 ## Execution Modes
 
@@ -24,583 +37,278 @@ Generate specialized test-fix task JSON with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle
 - **Manual Mode (Default)**: Gemini diagnosis → user applies fixes
 - **Codex Mode (`--use-codex`)**: Gemini diagnosis → Codex applies fixes with resume mechanism
 
-## Core Philosophy
-- **Analysis-Driven Test Generation**: Use TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
-- **Agent-Based Test Creation**: Call @code-developer agent for comprehensive test generation
-- **Coverage-First**: Generate all missing tests before execution
-- **Test Execution**: Execute complete test suite after generation
-- **Gemini Diagnosis**: Use Gemini for root cause analysis and fix suggestions (references bug-fix template)
-- **Manual Fixes First**: Apply fixes manually by default, codex only when explicitly needed
-- **Iterative Refinement**: Repeat test-analyze-fix-retest cycle until all tests pass
-- **Surgical Fixes**: Minimal code changes, no refactoring during test fixes
-- **Auto-Revert**: Rollback all changes if max iterations reached
-
-## Core Responsibilities
-- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from test-concept-enhanced
-- Extract test requirements and generation strategy
-- Parse `--use-codex` flag to determine fix mode (manual vs automated)
-- Generate test generation subtask calling @code-developer
-- Generate test execution and fix cycle task JSON with appropriate fix mode
-- Configure Gemini diagnosis workflow (bug-fix template) and manual/Codex fix application
-- Create test-oriented IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md with test generation phase
-
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
-### Phase 1: Input Validation & Discovery
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading
+**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
 
-1. **Parameter Parsing**
-   - Parse `--use-codex` flag from command arguments → Controls IMPL-002 fix mode
-   - Parse `--cli-execute` flag from command arguments → Controls IMPL-001 generation mode
-   - Store flag values for task JSON generation
-
-2. **Test Session Validation**
-   - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json`
-   - Verify `workflow_type: "test_session"`
-   - Extract `source_session_id` from metadata
-
-3. **Test Analysis Results Loading**
-   - **REQUIRED**: Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
-   - Parse test requirements by file
-   - Extract test generation strategy
-   - Identify test files to create with specifications
-
-4. **Test Context Package Loading**
-   - Load `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json`
-   - Extract test framework configuration
-   - Extract coverage gaps and priorities
-   - Load source session implementation summaries
-
-### Phase 2: Task JSON Generation
-
-Generate **TWO task JSON files**:
-1. **IMPL-001.json** - Test Generation (calls @code-developer)
-2. **IMPL-002.json** - Test Execution and Fix Cycle (calls @test-fix-agent)
-
-#### IMPL-001.json - Test Generation Task
-
-```json
+**Agent Context Package**:
+```javascript
 {
-  "id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Generate comprehensive tests for [sourceSessionId]",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "test-gen",
-    "agent": "@code-developer",
-    "source_session": "[sourceSessionId]",
-    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|cargo|detected"
+  "session_id": "WFS-test-[session-id]",
+  "execution_mode": "agent-mode" | "cli-execute-mode",  // Determined by flag
+  "task_json_template_path": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt"
+                           | "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt",
+  // Path selected by command based on --cli-execute flag, agent reads it
+  "workflow_type": "test_session",
+  "use_codex": true | false,  // Determined by --use-codex flag
+  "session_metadata": {
+    // If in memory: use cached content
+    // Else: Load from .workflow/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json
   },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Generate comprehensive test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
-      "Follow existing test patterns and conventions from test framework",
-      "Create tests for all missing coverage identified in analysis",
-      "Include happy path, error handling, edge cases, and integration tests",
-      "Use test data and mocks as specified in analysis",
-      "Ensure tests follow project coding standards"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": [
-      "tests/**/*",
-      "src/**/*.test.*",
-      "{paths_from_analysis}"
-    ],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "All test files from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5 are created",
-      "Tests follow existing test patterns and conventions",
-      "Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases, integration",
-      "All dependencies are properly mocked",
-      "Test files are syntactically valid and can be executed",
-      "Test coverage meets analysis requirements"
-    ],
-    "depends_on": [],
-    "source_context": {
-      "session_id": "[sourceSessionId]",
-      "test_analysis": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
-      "test_context": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json",
-      "implementation_summaries": [
-        ".workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md"
-      ]
-    }
+  "test_analysis_results_path": ".workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+  "test_analysis_results": {
+    // If in memory: use cached content
+    // Else: Load from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
   },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_test_analysis",
-        "action": "Load test generation requirements and strategy",
-        "commands": [
-          "Read(.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)",
-          "Read(.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "test_generation_requirements",
-        "on_error": "fail"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_implementation_context",
-        "action": "Load source implementation for test generation context",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(for f in .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md; do echo \"=== $(basename $f) ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "implementation_context",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_existing_test_patterns",
-        "action": "Study existing tests for pattern reference",
-        "commands": [
-          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
-          "bash(# Read first 2 existing test files as examples)",
-          "bash(test_files=$(mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\") | head -2))",
-          "bash(for f in $test_files; do echo \"=== $f ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "existing_test_patterns",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      }
-    ],
-    // Agent Mode (Default): Agent implements tests
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Generate comprehensive test suite",
-        "description": "Generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md. Follow test generation strategy and create all test files listed in section 5 (Implementation Targets).",
-        "modification_points": [
-          "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md sections 3 and 4",
-          "Study existing test patterns",
-          "Create test files with all required scenarios",
-          "Implement happy path, error handling, edge case, and integration tests",
-          "Add required mocks and fixtures"
-        ],
-        "logic_flow": [
-          "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 3 (Test Requirements by File)",
-          "Read TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 4 (Test Generation Strategy)",
-          "Study existing test patterns from test_context.test_framework.conventions",
-          "For each test file in section 5 (Implementation Targets): Create test file with specified scenarios, Implement happy path tests, Implement error handling tests, Implement edge case tests, Implement integration tests (if specified), Add required mocks and fixtures",
-          "Follow test framework conventions and project standards",
-          "Ensure all tests are executable and syntactically valid"
-        ],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "test_suite"
-      }
-    ],
-
-    // CLI Execute Mode (--cli-execute): Use Codex command (alternative format shown below)
-    "implementation_approach": [{
-      "step": 1,
-      "title": "Generate tests using Codex",
-      "description": "Use Codex CLI to autonomously generate comprehensive test suite based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
-      "modification_points": [
-        "Codex loads TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and existing test patterns",
-        "Codex generates all test files listed in analysis section 5",
-        "Codex ensures tests follow framework conventions"
-      ],
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Start new Codex session",
-        "Pass TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md to Codex",
-        "Codex studies existing test patterns",
-        "Codex generates comprehensive test suite",
-        "Codex validates test syntax and executability"
-      ],
-      "command": "bash(codex -C [focus_paths] --full-auto exec \"PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive test suite TASK: Create test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5 MODE: write CONTEXT: @{.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md,.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process/test-context-package.json} EXPECTED: All test files with happy path, error handling, edge cases, integration tests RULES: Follow test framework conventions, ensure tests are executable\" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)",
-      "depends_on": [],
-      "output": "test_generation"
-    }],
-    "target_files": [
-      "{test_file_1 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
-      "{test_file_2 from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}",
-      "{test_file_N from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5}"
-    ]
+  "test_context_package_path": ".workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json",
+  "test_context_package": {
+    // Existing test patterns and coverage analysis
+  },
+  "source_session_id": "[source-session-id]",  // if exists
+  "source_session_summaries": {
+    // Implementation context from source session
+  },
+  "mcp_capabilities": {
+    "code_index": true,
+    "exa_code": true,
+    "exa_web": true
   }
 }
 ```
 
-#### IMPL-002.json - Test Execution & Fix Cycle Task
+**Discovery Actions**:
+1. **Load Test Session Context** (if not in memory)
+   ```javascript
+   if (!memory.has("workflow-session.json")) {
+     Read(.workflow/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json)
+   }
+   ```
 
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-002",
-  "title": "Execute and fix tests for [sourceSessionId]",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "test-fix",
-    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
-    "source_session": "[sourceSessionId]",
-    "test_framework": "jest|pytest|cargo|detected",
-    "max_iterations": 5,
-    "use_codex": false  // Set to true if --use-codex flag present
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Execute complete test suite (generated in IMPL-001)",
-      "Diagnose test failures using Gemini analysis with bug-fix template",
-      "Present fixes to user for manual application (default)",
-      "Use Codex ONLY if user explicitly requests automation",
-      "Iterate until all tests pass or max iterations reached",
-      "Revert changes if unable to fix within iteration limit"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": [
-      "tests/**/*",
-      "src/**/*.test.*",
-      "{implementation_files_from_source_session}"
-    ],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "All tests pass successfully (100% pass rate)",
-      "No test failures or errors in final run",
-      "Code changes are minimal and surgical",
-      "All fixes are verified through retest",
-      "Iteration logs document fix progression"
-    ],
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-001"],
-    "source_context": {
-      "session_id": "[sourceSessionId]",
-      "test_generation_summary": ".workflow/[testSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
-      "implementation_summaries": [
-        ".workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md"
-      ]
-    }
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_source_session_summaries",
-        "action": "Load implementation context from source session",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(find .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/ -name 'IMPL-*-summary.md' 2>/dev/null)",
-          "bash(for f in .workflow/[sourceSessionId]/.summaries/IMPL-*-summary.md; do echo \"=== $(basename $f) ===\"&& cat \"$f\"; done)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "implementation_context",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "discover_test_framework",
-        "action": "Identify test framework and test command",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(jq -r '.scripts.test // \"npm test\"' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo 'pytest' || echo 'cargo test')",
-          "bash([ -f 'package.json' ] && echo 'jest/npm' || [ -f 'pytest.ini' ] && echo 'pytest' || [ -f 'Cargo.toml' ] && echo 'cargo' || echo 'unknown')"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "test_command",
-        "on_error": "fail"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "analyze_test_coverage",
-        "action": "Analyze test coverage and identify missing tests",
-        "commands": [
-          "mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
-          "mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern=\"test|describe|it|def test_\", file_pattern=\"*.test.*\")",
-          "bash(# Count implementation files vs test files)",
-          "bash(impl_count=$(find [changed_files_dirs] -type f \\( -name '*.ts' -o -name '*.js' -o -name '*.py' \\) ! -name '*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | wc -l))",
-          "bash(test_count=$(mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern=\"*.test.*\") | wc -l))",
-          "bash(echo \"Implementation files: $impl_count, Test files: $test_count\")"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "test_coverage_analysis",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "identify_files_without_tests",
-        "action": "List implementation files that lack corresponding test files",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(# For each changed file from source session, check if test exists)",
-          "bash(for file in [changed_files]; do test_file=$(echo $file | sed 's/\\(.*\\)\\.\\(ts\\|js\\|py\\)$/\\1.test.\\2/'); [ ! -f \"$test_file\" ] && echo \"$file\"; done)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "files_without_tests",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "prepare_test_environment",
-        "action": "Ensure test environment is ready",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash([ -f 'package.json' ] && npm install 2>/dev/null || true)",
-          "bash([ -f 'requirements.txt' ] && pip install -q -r requirements.txt 2>/dev/null || true)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "environment_status",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle",
-        "description": "Execute iterative test-fix-retest cycle using Gemini diagnosis (bug-fix template) and manual fixes (Codex only if meta.use_codex=true). Max 5 iterations with automatic revert on failure.",
-        "test_fix_cycle": {
-          "max_iterations": 5,
-          "cycle_pattern": "test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if needed) → retest",
-          "tools": {
-            "test_execution": "bash(test_command)",
-            "diagnosis": "gemini-wrapper (MODE: analysis, uses bug-fix template)",
-            "fix_application": "manual (default) or codex exec resume --last (if explicitly needed)",
-            "verification": "bash(test_command) + regression_check"
-          },
-          "exit_conditions": {
-            "success": "all_tests_pass",
-            "failure": "max_iterations_reached",
-            "error": "test_command_not_found"
-          }
-        },
-        "modification_points": [
-        "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
-        "  1.1. Discover test command from framework detection",
-        "  1.2. Execute initial test run: bash([test_command])",
-        "  1.3. Parse test output and count failures",
-        "  1.4. If all pass → Skip to PHASE 3 (success)",
-        "  1.5. If failures → Store failure output, proceed to PHASE 2",
-        "",
-        "PHASE 2: Iterative Test-Fix-Retest Cycle (max 5 iterations)",
-        "  Note: This phase handles test failures, NOT test generation failures",
-        "  Initialize: max_iterations=5, current_iteration=0",
-        "  ",
-        "  WHILE (tests failing AND current_iteration < max_iterations):",
-        "    current_iteration++",
-        "    ",
-        "    STEP 2.1: Gemini Diagnosis (using bug-fix template)",
-        "    - Prepare diagnosis context:",
-        "      * Test failure output from previous run",
-        "      * Source files from focus_paths",
-        "      * Implementation summaries from source session",
-        "    - Execute Gemini analysis with bug-fix template:",
-        "      bash(cd .workflow/WFS-test-[session]/.process && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p \"",
-        "      PURPOSE: Diagnose test failure iteration [N] and propose minimal fix",
-        "      TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations for test failure",
-        "      MODE: analysis",
-        "      CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}",
-        "               Test output: [test_failures]",
-        "               Source files: [focus_paths]",
-        "               Implementation: [implementation_context]",
-        "      EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fixes",
-        "      RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [test_failure_description]",
-        "             Minimal surgical fixes only - no refactoring",
-        "      \" > fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md)",
-        "    - Parse diagnosis → extract fix_suggestion and target_files",
-        "    - Present fix to user for manual application (default)",
-        "    ",
-        "    STEP 2.2: Apply Fix (Based on meta.use_codex Flag)",
-        "    ",
-        "    IF meta.use_codex = false (DEFAULT):",
-        "    - Present Gemini diagnosis to user for manual fix",
-        "    - User applies fix based on diagnosis recommendations",
-        "    - Stage changes: bash(git add -A)",
-        "    - Store fix log: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-changes.log",
-        "    ",
-        "    IF meta.use_codex = true (--use-codex flag present):",
-        "    - Stage current changes (if valid git repo): bash(git add -A)",
-        "    - First iteration: Start new Codex session",
-        "      codex -C [project_root] --full-auto exec \"",
-        "      PURPOSE: Fix test failure iteration 1",
-        "      TASK: [fix_suggestion from Gemini]",
-        "      MODE: write",
-        "      CONTEXT: Diagnosis: .workflow/.process/fix-iteration-1-diagnosis.md",
-        "               Target files: [target_files]",
-        "               Implementation context: [implementation_context]",
-        "      EXPECTED: Minimal code changes to resolve test failure",
-        "      RULES: Apply ONLY suggested changes, no refactoring",
-        "             Preserve existing code style",
-        "      \" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access",
-        "    - Subsequent iterations: Resume session for context continuity",
-        "      codex exec \"",
-        "      CONTINUE TO NEXT FIX:",
-        "      Iteration [N] of 5: Fix test failure",
-        "      ",
-        "      PURPOSE: Fix remaining test failures",
-        "      TASK: [fix_suggestion from Gemini iteration N]",
-        "      CONTEXT: Previous fixes applied, diagnosis: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-diagnosis.md",
-        "      EXPECTED: Surgical fix for current failure",
-        "      RULES: Build on previous fixes, maintain consistency",
-        "      \" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access",
-        "    - Store fix log: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-changes.log",
-        "    ",
-        "    STEP 2.3: Retest and Verification",
-        "    - Re-execute test suite: bash([test_command])",
-        "    - Capture output: .process/fix-iteration-[N]-retest.log",
-        "    - Count failures: bash(grep -c 'FAIL\\|ERROR' .process/fix-iteration-[N]-retest.log)",
-        "    - Check for regression:",
-        "      IF new_failures > previous_failures:",
-        "        WARN: Regression detected",
-        "        Include in next Gemini diagnosis context",
-        "    - Analyze results:",
-        "      IF all_tests_pass:",
-        "        BREAK loop → Proceed to PHASE 3",
-        "      ELSE:",
-        "        Update test_failures context",
-        "        CONTINUE loop",
-        "  ",
-        "  IF max_iterations reached AND tests still failing:",
-        "    EXECUTE: git reset --hard HEAD (revert all changes)",
-        "    MARK: Task status = blocked",
-        "    GENERATE: Detailed failure report with iteration logs",
-        "    EXIT: Require manual intervention",
-        "",
-        "PHASE 3: Final Validation and Certification",
-        "  3.1. Execute final confirmation test run",
-        "  3.2. Generate success summary:",
-        "       - Iterations required: [current_iteration]",
-        "       - Fixes applied: [summary from iteration logs]",
-        "       - Test results: All passing ✅",
-        "  3.3. Mark task status: completed",
-        "  3.4. Update TODO_LIST.md: Mark as ✅",
-        "  3.5. Certify code: APPROVED for deployment"
-      ],
-      "logic_flow": [
-        "Load source session implementation context",
-        "Discover test framework and command",
-        "PHASE 0: Test Coverage Check",
-        "  Analyze existing test files",
-        "  Identify files without tests",
-        "  IF tests missing:",
-        "    Report to user (no automatic generation)",
-        "    Wait for user to generate tests or request automation",
-        "  ELSE:",
-        "    Skip to Phase 1",
-        "PHASE 1: Initial Test Execution",
-        "  Execute test suite",
-        "  IF all pass → Success (Phase 3)",
-        "  ELSE → Store failures, proceed to Phase 2",
-        "PHASE 2: Iterative Fix Cycle (max 5 iterations)",
-        "  LOOP (max 5 times):",
-        "    1. Gemini diagnoses failure with bug-fix template → fix suggestion",
-        "    2. Check meta.use_codex flag:",
-        "       - IF false (default): Present fix to user for manual application",
-        "       - IF true (--use-codex): Codex applies fix with resume for continuity",
-        "    3. Retest and check results",
-        "    4. IF pass → Exit loop to Phase 3",
-        "    5. ELSE → Continue with updated context",
-        "  IF max iterations → Revert + report failure",
-        "PHASE 3: Final Validation",
-        "  Confirm all tests pass",
-        "  Generate summary (include test generation info)",
-        "  Certify code APPROVED"
-      ],
-        "error_handling": {
-          "max_iterations_reached": {
-            "action": "revert_all_changes",
-            "commands": [
-              "bash(git reset --hard HEAD)",
-              "bash(jq '.status = \"blocked\"' .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json > temp.json && mv temp.json .workflow/[session]/.task/IMPL-001.json)"
-            ],
-            "report": "Generate failure report with iteration logs in .summaries/IMPL-001-failure-report.md"
-          },
-          "test_command_fails": {
-            "action": "treat_as_test_failure",
-            "context": "Use stderr as failure context for Gemini diagnosis"
-          },
-          "codex_apply_fails": {
-            "action": "retry_once_then_skip",
-            "fallback": "Mark iteration as skipped, continue to next"
-          },
-          "gemini_diagnosis_fails": {
-            "action": "retry_with_simplified_context",
-            "fallback": "Use previous diagnosis, continue"
-          },
-          "regression_detected": {
-            "action": "log_warning_continue",
-            "context": "Include regression info in next Gemini diagnosis"
-          }
-        },
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "test_fix_results"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": [
-      "Auto-discovered from test failures",
-      "Extracted from Gemini diagnosis each iteration",
-      "Format: file:function:lines or file (for new files)"
-    ],
-    "codex_session": {
-      "strategy": "resume_for_continuity",
-      "first_iteration": "codex exec \"fix iteration 1\" --full-auto",
-      "subsequent_iterations": "codex exec \"fix iteration N\" resume --last",
-      "benefits": [
-        "Maintains conversation context across fixes",
-        "Remembers previous decisions and patterns",
-        "Ensures consistency in fix approach",
-        "Reduces redundant context injection"
-      ]
-    }
-  }
+2. **Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md** (if not in memory, REQUIRED)
+   ```javascript
+   if (!memory.has("TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")) {
+     Read(.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Load Test Context Package** (if not in memory)
+   ```javascript
+   if (!memory.has("test-context-package.json")) {
+     Read(.workflow/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json)
+   }
+   ```
+
+4. **Load Source Session Summaries** (if source_session_id exists)
+   ```javascript
+   if (sessionMetadata.source_session_id) {
+     const summaryFiles = Bash("find .workflow/{source-session-id}/.summaries/ -name 'IMPL-*-summary.md'")
+     summaryFiles.forEach(file => Read(file))
+   }
+   ```
+
+5. **Code Analysis with Native Tools** (optional - enhance understanding)
+   ```bash
+   # Find test files and patterns
+   find . -name "*test*" -type f
+   rg "describe|it\(|test\(" -g "*.ts"
+   ```
+
+6. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather test best practices)
+   ```javascript
+   // Get external test examples and patterns
+   mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
+     query="TypeScript test generation best practices jest",
+     tokensNum="dynamic"
+   )
+   ```
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
+
+**Pre-Agent Template Selection** (Command decides path before invoking agent):
+```javascript
+// Command checks flag and selects template PATH (not content)
+const templatePath = hasCliExecuteFlag
+  ? "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt"
+  : "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt";
+```
+
+**Agent Invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
+  description="Generate test-fix task JSON and implementation plan",
+  prompt=`
+## Execution Context
+
+**Session ID**: WFS-test-{session-id}
+**Workflow Type**: Test Session
+**Execution Mode**: {agent-mode | cli-execute-mode}
+**Task JSON Template Path**: {template_path}
+**Use Codex**: {true | false}
+
+## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
+
+### Test Session Metadata
+{session_metadata_content}
+- source_session_id: {source_session_id} (if exists)
+- workflow_type: "test_session"
+
+### TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (REQUIRED)
+{test_analysis_results_content}
+- Coverage Assessment
+- Test Framework & Conventions
+- Test Requirements by File
+- Test Generation Strategy
+- Implementation Targets
+- Success Criteria
+
+### Test Context Package
+{test_context_package_summary}
+- Existing test patterns, framework config, coverage analysis
+
+### Source Session Implementation Context (Optional)
+{source_session_summaries}
+- Implementation context from completed session
+
+### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
+**Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
+**External Research**: {mcp_exa_research_results}
+
+## Phase 2: Test Task Document Generation
+
+**Agent Configuration Reference**: All test task generation rules, test-fix cycle structure, quality standards, and execution details are defined in action-planning-agent.
+
+Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
+- Test Task Decomposition Standards
+- Test-Fix-Retest Cycle Requirements
+- 5-Field Task JSON Schema
+- IMPL_PLAN.md Structure (Test variant)
+- TODO_LIST.md Format
+- Test Execution Flow & Quality Validation
+
+### Test-Specific Requirements Summary
+
+#### Task Structure Philosophy
+- **Minimum 2 tasks**: IMPL-001 (test generation) + IMPL-002 (test execution & fix)
+- **Expandable**: Add IMPL-003+ for complex projects (per-module, integration, etc.)
+- IMPL-001: Uses @code-developer or CLI execution
+- IMPL-002: Uses @test-fix-agent with iterative fix cycle
+
+#### Test-Fix Cycle Configuration
+- **Max Iterations**: 5 (for IMPL-002)
+- **Diagnosis Tool**: Gemini with bug-fix template
+- **Fix Application**: Manual (default) or Codex (if --use-codex flag)
+- **Cycle Pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex) → retest
+- **Exit Conditions**: All tests pass OR max iterations reached (auto-revert)
+
+#### Required Outputs Summary
+
+##### 1. Test Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+- **Location**: `.workflow/{test-session-id}/.task/`
+- **Template**: Read from `{template_path}` (pre-selected by command based on `--cli-execute` flag)
+- **Schema**: 5-field structure with test-specific metadata
+  - IMPL-001: `meta.type: "test-gen"`, `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+  - IMPL-002: `meta.type: "test-fix"`, `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`, `meta.use_codex: {use_codex}`
+  - `flow_control`: Test generation approach (IMPL-001) or test-fix cycle (IMPL-002)
+- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Test Task JSON Generation
+
+##### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md (Test Variant)
+- **Location**: `.workflow/{test-session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md`
+- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/impl-plan-template.txt`
+- **Test-Specific Frontmatter**: workflow_type="test_session", test_framework, source_session_id
+- **Test-Fix-Retest Cycle Section**: Iterative fix cycle with Gemini diagnosis
+- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Test Implementation Plan Creation
+
+##### 3. TODO_LIST.md
+- **Location**: `.workflow/{test-session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
+- **Format**: Task list with test generation and execution phases
+- **Status**: [ ] (pending), [x] (completed)
+- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § TODO List Generation
+
+### Agent Execution Summary
+
+**Key Steps** (Detailed instructions in action-planning-agent.md):
+1. Load task JSON template from provided path
+2. Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md for test requirements
+3. Generate IMPL-001 (test generation) task JSON
+4. Generate IMPL-002 (test execution & fix) task JSON with use_codex flag
+5. Generate additional IMPL-*.json if project complexity requires
+6. Create IMPL_PLAN.md using test template variant
+7. Generate TODO_LIST.md with test task indicators
+8. Update session state with test metadata
+
+**Quality Gates** (Full checklist in action-planning-agent.md):
+- ✓ Minimum 2 tasks created (IMPL-001 + IMPL-002)
+- ✓ IMPL-001 has test generation approach from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- ✓ IMPL-002 has test-fix cycle with correct use_codex flag
+- ✓ Test framework configuration integrated
+- ✓ Source session context referenced (if exists)
+- ✓ MCP tool integration added
+- ✓ Documents follow test template structure
+
+## Output
+
+Generate all three documents and report completion status:
+- Test task JSON files created: N files (minimum 2)
+- Test requirements integrated: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- Test context integrated: existing patterns and coverage
+- Source session context: {source_session_id} summaries (if exists)
+- MCP enhancements: code-index, exa-research
+- Session ready for test execution: /workflow:execute or /workflow:test-cycle-execute
+`
+)
+```
+
+### Agent Context Passing
+
+**Memory-Aware Context Assembly**:
+```javascript
+// Assemble context package for agent
+const agentContext = {
+  session_id: "WFS-test-[id]",
+  workflow_type: "test_session",
+  use_codex: hasUseCodexFlag,
+
+  // Use memory if available, else load
+  session_metadata: memory.has("workflow-session.json")
+    ? memory.get("workflow-session.json")
+    : Read(.workflow/WFS-test-[id]/workflow-session.json),
+
+  test_analysis_results_path: ".workflow/WFS-test-[id]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
+
+  test_analysis_results: memory.has("TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
+    ? memory.get("TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
+    : Read(".workflow/WFS-test-[id]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md"),
+
+  test_context_package_path: ".workflow/WFS-test-[id]/.process/test-context-package.json",
+
+  test_context_package: memory.has("test-context-package.json")
+    ? memory.get("test-context-package.json")
+    : Read(".workflow/WFS-test-[id]/.process/test-context-package.json"),
+
+  // Load source session summaries if exists
+  source_session_id: session_metadata.source_session_id || null,
+
+  source_session_summaries: session_metadata.source_session_id
+    ? loadSourceSummaries(session_metadata.source_session_id)
+    : null,
+
+  // Optional MCP enhancements
+  mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
 }
 ```
 
-### Phase 3: IMPL_PLAN.md Generation
+## Test Task Structure Reference
 
-#### Document Structure
-```markdown
----
-identifier: WFS-test-[session-id]
-source_session: WFS-[source-session-id]
-workflow_type: test_session
-test_framework: jest|pytest|cargo|detected
----
+This section provides quick reference for test task JSON structure. For complete implementation details, see the agent invocation prompt in Phase 2 above.
 
-# Test Validation Plan: [Source Session Topic]
-
-## Summary
-Execute comprehensive test suite for implementation from session WFS-[source-session-id].
-Diagnose and fix all test failures using iterative Gemini analysis and Codex execution.
-
-## Source Session Context
-- **Implementation Session**: WFS-[source-session-id]
-- **Completed Tasks**: IMPL-001, IMPL-002, ...
-- **Changed Files**: [list from git log]
-- **Implementation Summaries**: [references to source session summaries]
-
-## Test Framework
-- **Detected Framework**: jest|pytest|cargo|other
-- **Test Command**: npm test|pytest|cargo test
-- **Test Files**: [discovered test files]
-- **Coverage**: [estimated test coverage]
-
-## Test-Fix-Retest Cycle
-- **Max Iterations**: 5
-- **Diagnosis Tool**: Gemini (analysis mode with bug-fix template from bug-index.md)
-- **Fix Tool**: Manual (default, meta.use_codex=false) or Codex (if --use-codex flag, meta.use_codex=true)
-- **Verification**: Bash test execution + regression check
-
-### Cycle Workflow
-1. **Initial Test**: Execute full suite, capture failures
-2. **Iterative Fix Loop** (max 5 times):
-   - Gemini diagnoses failure using bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestion
-   - Check meta.use_codex flag:
-     - If false (default): Present fix to user for manual application
-     - If true (--use-codex): Codex applies fix with resume for context continuity
-   - Retest and verify (check for regressions)
-   - Continue until all pass or max iterations reached
-3. **Final Validation**: Confirm all tests pass, certify code
-
-### Error Recovery
-- **Max iterations reached**: Revert all changes, report failure
-- **Test command fails**: Treat as test failure, diagnose with Gemini
-- **Codex fails**: Retry once, skip iteration if still failing
-- **Regression detected**: Log warning, include in next diagnosis
-
-## Task Breakdown
-- **IMPL-001**: Execute and validate tests with iterative fix cycle
-
-## Implementation Strategy
-- **Phase 1**: Initial test execution and failure capture
-- **Phase 2**: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + Codex fix + retest
-- **Phase 3**: Final validation and code certification
-
-## Success Criteria
-- All tests pass (100% pass rate)
-- No test failures or errors in final run
-- Minimal, surgical code changes
-- Iteration logs document fix progression
-- Code certified APPROVED for deployment
-```
-
-### Phase 4: TODO_LIST.md Generation
-
-```markdown
-# Tasks: Test Validation for [Source Session]
-
-## Task Progress
-- [ ] **IMPL-001**: Execute and validate tests with iterative fix cycle → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
-
-## Execution Details
-- **Source Session**: WFS-[source-session-id]
-- **Test Framework**: jest|pytest|cargo
-- **Max Iterations**: 5
-- **Tools**: Gemini diagnosis + Codex resume fixes
-
-## Status Legend
-- `- [ ]` = Pending
-- `- [x]` = Completed
-```
+**Quick Reference**:
+- Minimum 2 tasks: IMPL-001 (test-gen) + IMPL-002 (test-fix)
+- Expandable for complex projects (IMPL-003+)
+- IMPL-001: `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`, test generation approach
+- IMPL-002: `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`, `meta.use_codex: {flag}`, test-fix cycle
+- See Phase 2 agent prompt for full schema and requirements
 
 ## Output Files Structure
 ```
@@ -648,29 +356,42 @@ Diagnose and fix all test failures using iterative Gemini analysis and Codex exe
 ## Integration & Usage
 
 ### Command Chain
-- **Called By**: `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4)
-- **Calls**: None (terminal command)
-- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute` (user-triggered)
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4), `/workflow:test-fix-gen` (Phase 4)
+- **Invokes**: `action-planning-agent` for autonomous task generation
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute` or `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` (user-triggered)
 
 ### Basic Usage
 ```bash
-# Manual fix mode (default)
+# Agent mode (default, autonomous execution)
 /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
 
-# Automated Codex fix mode
+# With automated Codex fixes for IMPL-002
 /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+
+# CLI execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation
+/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --session WFS-test-auth
+
+# Both flags combined
+/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
 ```
 
-### Flag Behavior
-- **No flag**: `meta.use_codex=false`, manual fixes presented to user
-- **--use-codex**: `meta.use_codex=true`, Codex automatically applies fixes with resume mechanism
+### Execution Modes
+- **Agent mode** (default): Uses `action-planning-agent` with agent-mode task template
+- **CLI mode** (`--cli-execute`): Uses Gemini/Qwen/Codex with cli-mode task template for IMPL-001
+- **Codex fixes** (`--use-codex`): Enables automated fixes in IMPL-002 task
 
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:test-gen` - Creates test session and calls this tool
-- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides cross-session context
-- `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced` - Provides test strategy analysis
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes the generated test-fix task
-- `@test-fix-agent` - Agent that executes the iterative test-fix cycle
+### Flag Behavior
+- **No flags**: `meta.use_codex=false` (manual fixes), agent-mode generation
+- **--use-codex**: `meta.use_codex=true` (Codex automated fixes with resume mechanism in IMPL-002)
+- **--cli-execute**: Uses CLI tool execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation
+- **Both flags**: CLI generation + automated Codex fixes
+
+### Output
+- Test task JSON files in `.task/` directory (minimum 2: IMPL-001.json + IMPL-002.json)
+- IMPL_PLAN.md with test generation and fix cycle strategy
+- TODO_LIST.md with test task indicators
+- Session state updated with test metadata
+- MCP enhancements integrated (if available)
 
 ## Agent Execution Notes
 
@@ -690,6 +411,6 @@ The `@test-fix-agent` will execute the task by following the `flow_control.imple
 6. **Phase 3**: Generate summary and certify code
 7. **Error Recovery**: Revert changes if max iterations reached
 
-**Bug Diagnosis Template**: Uses bug-fix.md template as referenced in bug-index.md for systematic root cause analysis, code path tracing, and targeted fix recommendations.
+**Bug Diagnosis Template**: Uses `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt` template for systematic root cause analysis, code path tracing, and targeted fix recommendations.
 
 **Codex Usage**: The agent uses `codex exec "..." resume --last` pattern ONLY when meta.use_codex=true (--use-codex flag present) to maintain conversation context across multiple fix iterations, ensuring consistency and learning from previous attempts.

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/batch-generate.md

@@ -1,464 +0,0 @@
----
-name: batch-generate
-description: Prompt-driven batch UI generation using target-style-centric parallel execution
-argument-hint: [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--device-type "desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive"] [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*), mcp__exa__web_search_exa(*)
----
-
-# Batch Generate UI Prototypes (/workflow:ui-design:batch-generate)
-
-## Overview
-Prompt-driven UI generation with intelligent target extraction and **target-style-centric batch execution**. Each agent handles all layouts for one target × style combination.
-
-**Strategy**: Prompt → Targets → Batched Generation
-- **Prompt-driven**: Describe what to build, command extracts targets
-- **Agent scope**: Each of `T × S` agents generates `L` layouts
-- **Parallel batching**: Max 6 concurrent agents for optimal throughput
-- **Component isolation**: Complete task independence
-- **Style-aware**: HTML adapts to design_attributes
-- **Self-contained CSS**: Direct token values (no var() refs)
-
-**Supports**: Pages (full layouts) and components (isolated elements)
-
-## Phase 1: Setup & Validation
-
-### Step 1: Parse Prompt & Resolve Configuration
-```bash
-# Parse required parameters
-prompt_text = --prompt
-device_type = --device-type OR "responsive"
-
-# Extract targets from prompt
-IF --targets:
-    target_list = split_and_clean(--targets)
-ELSE:
-    target_list = extract_targets_from_prompt(prompt_text)  # See helpers
-    IF NOT target_list: target_list = ["home"]  # Fallback
-
-# Detect target type
-target_type = --target-type OR detect_target_type(target_list)
-
-# Resolve base path
-IF --base-path:
-    base_path = --base-path
-ELSE IF --session:
-    bash(find .workflow/WFS-{session} -type d -name "design-*" -printf "%T@ %p\n" | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
-ELSE:
-    bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" -printf "%T@ %p\n" | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
-
-# Get variant counts
-style_variants = --style-variants OR bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
-layout_variants = --layout-variants OR 3
-```
-
-**Output**: `base_path`, `target_list[]`, `target_type`, `device_type`, `style_variants`, `layout_variants`
-
-### Step 2: Detect Token Sources
-```bash
-# Check consolidated (priority 1) or proposed (priority 2)
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "consolidated")
-# OR
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "proposed")
-
-# If proposed: Create temp consolidation dirs + write tokens
-FOR style_id IN 1..style_variants:
-    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id})
-    Write({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json, proposed_tokens)
-
-# Load design space analysis (optional)
-IF exists({base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json):
-    design_space_analysis = Read({base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json)
-```
-
-**Output**: `token_sources{}`, `consolidated_count`, `proposed_count`, `design_space_analysis`
-
-### Step 3: Gather Layout Inspiration
-```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations)
-
-# For each target: Research via MCP
-FOR target IN target_list:
-    search_query = "{target} {target_type} layout patterns variations"
-    mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query=search_query, numResults=5)
-
-    # Extract context from prompt for this target
-    target_requirements = extract_relevant_context_from_prompt(prompt_text, target)
-
-    # Write simple inspiration file
-    Write({base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, inspiration_content)
-```
-
-**Output**: `T` inspiration text files
-
-## Phase 2: Target-Style-Centric Batch Generation (Agent)
-
-**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` × `T × S` tasks in **batched parallel** (max 6 concurrent)
-
-### Step 1: Calculate Batch Execution Plan
-```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes)
-
-# Build task list: T × S combinations
-MAX_PARALLEL = 6
-total_tasks = T × S
-total_batches = ceil(total_tasks / MAX_PARALLEL)
-
-# Initialize batch tracking
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {content: "Batch 1/{batches}: Generate 6 tasks", status: "in_progress"},
-  {content: "Batch 2/{batches}: Generate 6 tasks", status: "pending"},
-  ...
-]})
-```
-
-### Step 2: Launch Batched Agent Tasks
-For each batch (up to 6 parallel tasks):
-```javascript
-Task(ui-design-agent): `
-  [TARGET_STYLE_UI_GENERATION_FROM_PROMPT]
-  🎯 ONE component: {target} × Style-{style_id} ({philosophy_name})
-  Generate: {layout_variants} × 2 files (HTML + CSS per layout)
-
-  PROMPT CONTEXT: {target_requirements}  # Extracted from original prompt
-  TARGET: {target} | TYPE: {target_type} | STYLE: {style_id}/{style_variants}
-  BASE_PATH: {base_path}
-  DEVICE: {device_type}
-  ${design_attributes ? "DESIGN_ATTRIBUTES: " + JSON.stringify(design_attributes) : ""}
-
-  ## Reference
-  - Layout inspiration: Read("{base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt")
-  - Design tokens: Read("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
-    Parse ALL token values (colors, typography, spacing, borders, shadows, breakpoints)
-  ${design_attributes ? "- Adapt DOM to: density, visual_weight, formality, organic_vs_geometric" : ""}
-
-  ## Generation
-  For EACH layout (1 to {layout_variants}):
-
-  1. HTML: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-N.html
-     - Complete HTML5: <!DOCTYPE>, <head>, <body>
-     - CSS ref: <link href="{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-N.css">
-     - Semantic: <header>, <nav>, <main>, <footer>
-     - A11y: ARIA labels, landmarks, responsive meta
-     - Viewport: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
-     - Follow user requirements from prompt
-     ${design_attributes ? `
-     - DOM adaptation:
-       * density='spacious' → flatter hierarchy
-       * density='compact' → deeper nesting
-       * visual_weight='heavy' → extra wrappers
-       * visual_weight='minimal' → direct structure` : ""}
-     - Device-specific: Optimize for {device_type}
-
-  2. CSS: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-N.css
-     - Self-contained: Direct token VALUES (no var())
-     - Use tokens: colors, fonts, spacing, borders, shadows
-     - Device-optimized: {device_type} styles
-     ${device_type === 'responsive' ? '- Responsive: Mobile-first @media' : '- Fixed: ' + device_type}
-     ${design_attributes ? `
-     - Token selection: density → spacing, visual_weight → shadows` : ""}
-
-  ## Notes
-  - ✅ Token VALUES directly from design-tokens.json
-  - ✅ Follow prompt requirements for {target}
-  - ✅ Optimize for {device_type}
-  - ❌ NO var() refs, NO external deps
-  - Layouts structurally DISTINCT
-  - Write files IMMEDIATELY (per layout)
-  - CSS filename MUST match HTML <link href>
-`
-
-# After each batch completes
-TodoWrite: Mark batch completed, next batch in_progress
-```
-
-## Phase 3: Verify & Generate Previews
-
-### Step 1: Verify Generated Files
-```bash
-# Count expected vs found
-bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-*-layout-*.html | wc -l)
-# Expected: S × L × T × 2
-
-# Validate samples
-Read({base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html)
-# Check: <!DOCTYPE html>, correct CSS href, sufficient CSS length
-```
-
-**Output**: `S × L × T × 2` files verified
-
-### Step 2: Run Preview Generation Script
-```bash
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
-```
-
-**Script generates**:
-- `compare.html` (interactive matrix)
-- `index.html` (navigation)
-- `PREVIEW.md` (instructions)
-
-### Step 3: Verify Preview Files
-```bash
-bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html {base_path}/prototypes/index.html {base_path}/prototypes/PREVIEW.md)
-```
-
-**Output**: 3 preview files
-
-## Completion
-
-### Todo Update
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {content: "Setup and parse prompt", status: "completed", activeForm: "Parsing prompt"},
-  {content: "Detect token sources", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading design systems"},
-  {content: "Gather layout inspiration", status: "completed", activeForm: "Researching layouts"},
-  {content: "Batch 1/{batches}: Generate 6 tasks", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating batch 1"},
-  ... (all batches completed)
-  {content: "Verify files & generate previews", status: "completed", activeForm: "Creating previews"}
-]});
-```
-
-### Output Message
-```
-✅ Prompt-driven batch UI generation complete!
-
-Prompt: {prompt_text}
-
-Configuration:
-- Style Variants: {style_variants}
-- Layout Variants: {layout_variants}
-- Target Type: {target_type}
-- Device Type: {device_type}
-- Targets: {target_list} ({T} targets)
-- Total Prototypes: {S × L × T}
-
-Batch Execution:
-- Total tasks: {T × S} (targets × styles)
-- Batches: {batches} (max 6 parallel per batch)
-- Agent scope: {L} layouts per target×style
-- Component isolation: Complete task independence
-- Device-specific: All layouts optimized for {device_type}
-
-Quality:
-- Style-aware: {design_space_analysis ? 'HTML adapts to design_attributes' : 'Standard structure'}
-- CSS: Self-contained (direct token values, no var())
-- Device-optimized: {device_type} layouts
-- Tokens: {consolidated_count} consolidated, {proposed_count} proposed
-{IF proposed_count > 0: '  💡 For production: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate'}
-
-Generated Files:
-{base_path}/prototypes/
-├── _inspirations/ ({T} text files)
-├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html ({S×L×T} prototypes)
-├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.css
-├── compare.html (interactive matrix)
-├── index.html (navigation)
-└── PREVIEW.md (instructions)
-
-Preview:
-1. Open compare.html (recommended)
-2. Open index.html
-3. Read PREVIEW.md
-
-Next: /workflow:ui-design:update
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Path Operations
-```bash
-# Find design directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" -printf "%T@ %p\n" | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
-
-# Count style variants
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
-
-# Check token sources
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "consolidated")
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "proposed")
-```
-
-### Validation Commands
-```bash
-# Count generated files
-bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-*-layout-*.html | wc -l)
-
-# Verify preview
-bash(test -f {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html && echo "exists")
-```
-
-### File Operations
-```bash
-# Create directories
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes/_inspirations)
-
-# Run preview script
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
-```
-
-## Output Structure
-
-```
-{base_path}/
-├── prototypes/
-│   ├── _inspirations/
-│   │   └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt  # Layout inspiration
-│   ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html  # Final prototypes
-│   ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.css
-│   ├── compare.html
-│   ├── index.html
-│   └── PREVIEW.md
-└── style-consolidation/
-    └── style-{s}/
-        ├── design-tokens.json
-        └── style-guide.md
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Common Errors
-```
-ERROR: No token sources found
-→ Run /workflow:ui-design:extract or /workflow:ui-design:consolidate
-
-ERROR: No targets extracted from prompt
-→ Use --targets explicitly or rephrase prompt
-
-ERROR: MCP search failed
-→ Check network, retry
-
-ERROR: Batch {N} agent tasks failed
-→ Check agent output, retry specific target×style combinations
-
-ERROR: Script permission denied
-→ chmod +x ~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh
-```
-
-### Recovery Strategies
-- **Partial success**: Keep successful target×style combinations
-- **Missing design_attributes**: Works without (less style-aware)
-- **Invalid tokens**: Validate design-tokens.json structure
-- **Failed batch**: Re-run command, only failed combinations will retry
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [ ] Prompt clearly describes targets
-- [ ] CSS uses direct token values (no var())
-- [ ] HTML adapts to design_attributes (if available)
-- [ ] Semantic HTML5 structure
-- [ ] ARIA attributes present
-- [ ] Device-optimized layouts
-- [ ] Layouts structurally distinct
-- [ ] compare.html works
-
-## Key Features
-
-- **Prompt-Driven**: Describe what to build, command extracts targets
-- **Target-Style-Centric**: `T×S` agents, each handles `L` layouts
-- **Parallel Batching**: Max 6 concurrent agents with progress tracking
-- **Component Isolation**: Complete task independence
-- **Style-Aware**: HTML adapts to design_attributes
-- **Self-Contained CSS**: Direct token values (no var())
-- **Device-Specific**: Optimized for desktop/mobile/tablet/responsive
-- **Inspiration-Based**: MCP-powered layout research
-- **Production-Ready**: Semantic, accessible, responsive
-
-## Integration
-
-**Input**: Prompt, design-tokens.json, design-space-analysis.json (optional)
-**Output**: S×L×T prototypes for `/workflow:ui-design:update`
-**Compatible**: extract, consolidate, explore-auto, imitate-auto outputs
-
-## Usage Examples
-
-### Basic: Auto-detection
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:batch-generate \
-  --prompt "Dashboard with metric cards and charts"
-
-# Auto: latest design run, extracts "dashboard" target
-# Output: S × L × 1 prototypes
-```
-
-### With Session
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:batch-generate \
-  --prompt "Auth pages: login, signup, password reset" \
-  --session WFS-auth
-
-# Uses WFS-auth's design run
-# Extracts: ["login", "signup", "password-reset"]
-# Batches: 2 (if S=3: 9 tasks = 6+3)
-# Output: S × L × 3 prototypes
-```
-
-### Components with Device Type
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:batch-generate \
-  --prompt "Mobile UI components: navbar, card, footer" \
-  --target-type component \
-  --device-type mobile
-
-# Mobile-optimized component generation
-# Output: S × L × 3 prototypes
-```
-
-### Large Scale (Multi-batch)
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:batch-generate \
-  --prompt "E-commerce site" \
-  --targets "home,shop,product,cart,checkout" \
-  --style-variants 4 \
-  --layout-variants 2
-
-# Tasks: 5 × 4 = 20 (4 batches: 6+6+6+2)
-# Output: 4 × 2 × 5 = 40 prototypes
-```
-
-## Helper Functions Reference
-
-### Target Extraction
-```python
-# extract_targets_from_prompt(prompt_text)
-# Patterns: "Create X and Y", "Generate X, Y, Z pages", "Build X"
-# Returns: ["x", "y", "z"] (normalized lowercase with hyphens)
-
-# detect_target_type(target_list)
-# Keywords: page (home, dashboard, login) vs component (navbar, card, button)
-# Returns: "page" or "component"
-
-# extract_relevant_context_from_prompt(prompt_text, target)
-# Extracts sentences mentioning specific target
-# Returns: Relevant context string
-```
-
-## Batch Execution Details
-
-### Parallel Control
-- **Max concurrent**: 6 agents per batch
-- **Task distribution**: T × S tasks = ceil(T×S/6) batches
-- **Progress tracking**: TodoWrite per-batch status
-- **Examples**:
-  - 3 tasks → 1 batch
-  - 9 tasks → 2 batches (6+3)
-  - 20 tasks → 4 batches (6+6+6+2)
-
-### Performance
-| Tasks | Batches | Est. Time | Efficiency |
-|-------|---------|-----------|------------|
-| 1-6   | 1       | 3-5 min   | 100%       |
-| 7-12  | 2       | 6-10 min  | ~85%       |
-| 13-18 | 3       | 9-15 min  | ~80%       |
-| 19-30 | 4-5     | 12-25 min | ~75%       |
-
-### Optimization Tips
-1. **Reduce tasks**: Fewer targets or styles
-2. **Adjust layouts**: L=2 instead of L=3 for faster iteration
-3. **Stage generation**: Core pages first, secondary pages later
-
-## Notes
-
-- **Prompt quality**: Clear descriptions improve target extraction
-- **Token sources**: Consolidated (production) or proposed (fast-track)
-- **Batch parallelism**: Max 6 concurrent for stability
-- **Scalability**: Tested up to 30+ tasks (5+ batches)
-- **Dependencies**: MCP web search, ui-generate-preview.sh script

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/codify-style.md

@@ -0,0 +1,666 @@
+---
+name: workflow:ui-design:codify-style
+description: Orchestrator to extract styles from code and generate shareable reference package with preview (automatic file discovery)
+argument-hint: "<path> [--package-name <name>] [--output-dir <path>] [--overwrite]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand,Bash,Read,TodoWrite
+auto-continue: true
+---
+
+# UI Design: Codify Style (Orchestrator)
+
+## Overview & Execution Model
+
+**Fully autonomous orchestrator**: Coordinates style extraction from codebase and generates shareable reference packages.
+
+**Pure Orchestrator Pattern**: Does NOT directly execute agent tasks. Delegates to specialized commands:
+1. `/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code` - Extract styles from source code
+2. `/workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator` - Generate versioned reference package with interactive preview
+
+**Output**: Shareable, versioned style reference package at `.workflow/reference_style/{package-name}/`
+
+**Autonomous Flow** (⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION - DO NOT STOP):
+1. User triggers: `/workflow:ui-design:codify-style <path> --package-name <name>`
+2. Phase 0: Parameter validation & preparation → **IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 1**
+3. Phase 1 (import-from-code) → **Attach 4 tasks → Execute tasks → Collapse** → Auto-continues to Phase 2
+4. Phase 2 (reference-page-generator) → **Attach 4 tasks → Execute tasks → Collapse** → Auto-continues to Phase 3
+5. Phase 3 (cleanup & verification) → **Execute orchestrator task** → Reports completion
+
+**Phase Transition Mechanism**:
+- **Phase 0 (Validation)**: Validate parameters, prepare workspace → IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 1
+- **Phase 1-2 (Task Attachment)**: `SlashCommand` invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these tasks itself.
+- **Task Execution**: Orchestrator runs attached tasks sequentially, updating TodoWrite as each completes
+- **Task Collapse**: After all attached tasks complete, collapse them into phase summary
+- **Phase Transition**: Automatically execute next phase after collapsing completed tasks
+- No user interaction required after initial command
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**: TodoWrite tracks phase status with dynamic task attachment/collapse. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them, restore phase summary, and execute the next phase. No user intervention required. The workflow is NOT complete until reaching Phase 3.
+
+**Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation is NOT delegation - it's task expansion. The orchestrator executes these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: TodoWrite initialization → Phase 0 validation → Phase 1 execution
+2. **No Task JSON**: This command does not create task JSON files - pure orchestrator pattern
+3. **Parse & Pass**: Extract required data from each command output (design run path, metadata)
+4. **Intelligent Validation**: Smart parameter validation with user-friendly error messages
+5. **Safety First**: Package overwrite protection, existence checks, fallback error handling
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Attachment Model** - SlashCommand invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion. This is NOT delegation - it's task expansion.
+8. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP** - This is a continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them and execute the next phase. Workflow is NOT complete until Phase 3.
+
+---
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:codify-style <path> [OPTIONS]
+
+# Required
+<path>                  Source code directory to analyze
+
+# Optional
+--package-name <name>   Custom name for the style reference package
+                        (default: auto-generated from directory name)
+--output-dir <path>     Output directory (default: .workflow/reference_style)
+--overwrite             Overwrite existing package without prompting
+```
+
+**Note**: File discovery is fully automatic. The command will scan the source directory and find all style-related files (CSS, SCSS, JS, HTML) automatically.
+
+---
+
+## 4-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 0: Intelligent Parameter Validation & Session Preparation
+
+**Goal**: Validate parameters, check safety constraints, prepare session, and get user confirmation
+
+**TodoWrite** (First Action):
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Validate parameters and prepare session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating parameters"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (import-from-code)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting styles"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Reference package generation (reference-page-generator)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cleanup and verification"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Orchestrator tracks only high-level phases. Sub-command details shown when executed.
+
+**Step 0a: Parse and Validate Required Parameters**
+
+```bash
+# Parse positional path parameter (first non-flag argument)
+source_path = FIRST_POSITIONAL_ARG
+
+# Validate source path
+IF NOT source_path:
+    REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Missing required parameter: <path>"
+    REPORT: "USAGE: /workflow:ui-design:codify-style <path> [OPTIONS]"
+    REPORT: "EXAMPLE: /workflow:ui-design:codify-style ./src"
+    REPORT: "EXAMPLE: /workflow:ui-design:codify-style ./app --package-name design-system-v2"
+    EXIT 1
+
+# Validate source path existence
+TRY:
+    source_exists = Bash(test -d "${source_path}" && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+    IF source_exists != "exists":
+        REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Source directory not found: ${source_path}"
+        REPORT: "Please provide a valid directory path."
+        EXIT 1
+CATCH error:
+    REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Cannot validate source path: ${error}"
+    EXIT 1
+
+source = source_path
+STORE: source
+
+# Auto-generate package name if not provided
+IF NOT --package-name:
+    # Extract directory name from path
+    dir_name = Bash(basename "${source}")
+    # Normalize to package name format (lowercase, replace special chars with hyphens)
+    normalized_name = dir_name.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').replace(/^-+|-+$/g, '')
+    # Add version suffix
+    package_name = "${normalized_name}-style-v1"
+
+    ELSE:
+    package_name = --package-name
+
+    # Validate custom package name format (lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only)
+    IF NOT package_name MATCHES /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$/:
+        REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Invalid package name format: ${package_name}"
+        REPORT: "Requirements:"
+        REPORT: "  • Must start with lowercase letter or number"
+        REPORT: "  • Only lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens allowed"
+        REPORT: "  • No spaces or special characters"
+        REPORT: "EXAMPLES: main-app-style-v1, design-system-v2, component-lib-v1"
+        EXIT 1
+
+STORE: package_name, output_dir (default: ".workflow/reference_style"), overwrite_flag
+```
+
+**Step 0b: Intelligent Package Safety Check**
+
+```bash
+# Set default output directory
+output_dir = --output-dir OR ".workflow/reference_style"
+package_path = "${output_dir}/${package_name}"
+
+TRY:
+    package_exists = Bash(test -d "${package_path}" && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+
+    IF package_exists == "exists":
+        IF NOT --overwrite:
+            REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Package '${package_name}' already exists at ${package_path}/"
+            REPORT: "Use --overwrite flag to replace, or choose a different package name"
+            EXIT 1
+        ELSE:
+            REPORT: "⚠️  Overwriting existing package: ${package_name}"
+
+CATCH error:
+    REPORT: "⚠️  Warning: Cannot check package existence: ${error}"
+    REPORT: "Continuing with package creation..."
+```
+
+**Step 0c: Session Preparation**
+
+```bash
+# Create temporary workspace for processing
+TRY:
+    # Step 1: Ensure .workflow directory exists and generate unique ID
+    Bash(mkdir -p .workflow)
+    temp_id = Bash(echo "codify-temp-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)")
+
+    # Step 2: Create temporary directory
+    Bash(mkdir -p ".workflow/${temp_id}")
+
+    # Step 3: Get absolute path using bash
+    design_run_path = Bash(cd ".workflow/${temp_id}" && pwd)
+
+CATCH error:
+    REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Failed to create temporary workspace: ${error}"
+    EXIT 1
+
+STORE: temp_id, design_run_path
+```
+
+**Summary Variables**:
+- `SOURCE`: Validated source directory path
+- `PACKAGE_NAME`: Validated package name (lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens)
+- `PACKAGE_PATH`: Full output path `${output_dir}/${package_name}`
+- `OUTPUT_DIR`: `.workflow/reference_style` (default) or user-specified
+- `OVERWRITE`: `true` if --overwrite flag present
+- `CSS/SCSS/JS/HTML/STYLE_FILES`: Optional glob patterns
+- `TEMP_ID`: `codify-temp-{timestamp}` (temporary workspace identifier)
+- `DESIGN_RUN_PATH`: Absolute path to temporary workspace
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Update Phase 0 → completed, Phase 1 → in_progress, INSERT import-from-code tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Validate parameters and prepare session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Validating parameters"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.0: Discover and categorize code files (import-from-code)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Discovering code files"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.1: Style Agent extraction (import-from-code)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting style tokens"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.2: Animation Agent extraction (import-from-code)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting animation tokens"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.3: Layout Agent extraction (import-from-code)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting layout patterns"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Reference package generation (reference-page-generator)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cleanup and verification"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** import-from-code's 4 tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks itself.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 1.0-1.3** sequentially
+
+---
+
+### Phase 1: Style Extraction from Source Code
+
+**Goal**: Extract design tokens, style patterns, and component styles from codebase
+
+**Command Construction**:
+
+```bash
+# Build command with required parameters only
+# Use temp_id as design-id since it's the workspace directory name
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code" +
+          " --design-id \"${temp_id}\"" +
+          " --source \"${source}\""
+```
+
+**Execute Command (Task Attachment Pattern)**:
+
+```bash
+TRY:
+    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES import-from-code's 4 tasks to current workflow
+    # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself:
+    #   1. Phase 1.0: Discover and categorize code files
+    #   2. Phase 1.1: Style Agent extraction
+    #   3. Phase 1.2: Animation Agent extraction
+    #   4. Phase 1.3: Layout Agent extraction
+    SlashCommand(command)
+
+    # After executing all attached tasks, verify extraction outputs
+    tokens_path = "${design_run_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json"
+    guide_path = "${design_run_path}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md"
+
+    tokens_exists = Bash(test -f "${tokens_path}" && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+    guide_exists = Bash(test -f "${guide_path}" && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+
+    IF tokens_exists != "exists" OR guide_exists != "exists":
+        REPORT: "⚠️  WARNING: Expected extraction files not found"
+        REPORT: "Continuing with available outputs..."
+
+CATCH error:
+    REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Style extraction failed"
+    REPORT: "Error: ${error}"
+    REPORT: "Possible cause: Source directory contains no style files"
+    Bash(rm -rf .workflow/${temp_id})
+    EXIT 1
+```
+
+**Example Command**:
+```bash
+# Automatic file discovery
+/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code --design-id codify-temp-20250111-123456 --source ./src
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- ✅ `import-from-code` command executed successfully
+- ✅ Design run created at `${design_run_path}`
+- ✅ Required files exist:
+  - `design-tokens.json` - Complete design token system
+  - `style-guide.md` - Style documentation
+- ⭕ Optional files:
+  - `animation-tokens.json` - Animation specifications
+  - `component-patterns.json` - Component catalog
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: REMOVE Phase 1.0-1.3 tasks, INSERT reference-page-generator tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Validate parameters and prepare session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Validating parameters"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (import-from-code)", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Extracting styles"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.0: Setup and validation (reference-page-generator)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating parameters"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Prepare component data (reference-page-generator)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Copying layout templates"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Generate preview pages (reference-page-generator)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating preview"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cleanup and verification"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 1 tasks completed and collapsed. SlashCommand invocation **attaches** reference-page-generator's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks itself.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.0-2.2** sequentially
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Reference Package Generation
+
+**Goal**: Generate shareable reference package with interactive preview and documentation
+
+**Command Construction**:
+
+```bash
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator " +
+          "--design-run \"${design_run_path}\" " +
+          "--package-name \"${package_name}\" " +
+          "--output-dir \"${output_dir}\""
+```
+
+**Execute Command (Task Attachment Pattern)**:
+
+```bash
+TRY:
+    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES reference-page-generator's 3 tasks to current workflow
+    # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself:
+    #   1. Phase 2.0: Setup and validation
+    #   2. Phase 2.1: Prepare component data
+    #   3. Phase 2.2: Generate preview pages
+    SlashCommand(command)
+
+    # After executing all attached tasks, verify package outputs
+    required_files = [
+        "layout-templates.json",
+        "design-tokens.json",
+        "preview.html",
+        "preview.css"
+    ]
+
+    missing_files = []
+    FOR file IN required_files:
+        file_path = "${package_path}/${file}"
+        exists = Bash(test -f "${file_path}" && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+        IF exists != "exists":
+            missing_files.append(file)
+
+    IF missing_files.length > 0:
+        REPORT: "⚠️  WARNING: Some expected files are missing"
+        REPORT: "Package may be incomplete. Continuing with cleanup..."
+
+CATCH error:
+    REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Reference package generation failed"
+    REPORT: "Error: ${error}"
+    Bash(rm -rf .workflow/${temp_id})
+    EXIT 1
+```
+
+**Example Command**:
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator \
+  --design-run .workflow/codify-temp-20250111-123456 \
+  --package-name main-app-style-v1 \
+  --output-dir .workflow/reference_style
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- ✅ `reference-page-generator` executed successfully
+- ✅ Reference package created at `${package_path}/`
+- ✅ All required files present:
+  - `layout-templates.json` - Layout templates from design run
+  - `design-tokens.json` - Complete design token system
+  - `preview.html` - Interactive multi-component showcase
+  - `preview.css` - Showcase styling
+- ⭕ Optional files:
+  - `animation-tokens.json` - Animation specifications (if available from extraction)
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: REMOVE Phase 2.0-2.2 tasks, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Validate parameters and prepare session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Validating parameters"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (import-from-code)", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Extracting styles"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Reference package generation (reference-page-generator)", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Cleanup and verification"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**Next Action**: TodoWrite restored → **Execute Phase 3** (orchestrator's own task)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Cleanup & Verification
+
+**Goal**: Clean up temporary workspace and report completion
+
+**Operations**:
+
+```bash
+# Cleanup temporary workspace
+TRY:
+    Bash(rm -rf .workflow/${temp_id})
+CATCH error:
+    # Silent failure - not critical
+
+# Quick verification
+package_exists = Bash(test -d "${package_path}" && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+
+IF package_exists != "exists":
+    REPORT: "❌ ERROR: Package generation failed - directory not found"
+    EXIT 1
+
+# Get absolute path and component count for final report
+absolute_package_path = Bash(cd "${package_path}" && pwd 2>/dev/null || echo "${package_path}")
+component_count = Bash(jq -r '.layout_templates | length // "unknown"' "${package_path}/layout-templates.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
+anim_exists = Bash(test -f "${package_path}/animation-tokens.json" && echo "✓" || echo "○")
+```
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Update Phase 3 → completed -->
+
+**Final Action**: Display completion summary to user
+
+---
+
+## Completion Message
+
+```
+✅ Style reference package generated successfully
+
+📦 Package: {package_name}
+📂 Location: {absolute_package_path}/
+📄 Source: {source}
+📊 Components: {component_count}
+
+Files: layout-templates.json, design-tokens.json, animation-tokens.json (optional), preview.html, preview.css
+
+Preview: file://{absolute_package_path}/preview.html
+
+Next: /memory:style-skill-memory {package_name}
+```
+
+---
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize IMMEDIATELY at the start to track orchestrator workflow (4 high-level tasks)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Validate parameters and prepare session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating parameters"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (import-from-code)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting styles"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Reference package generation (reference-page-generator)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cleanup and verification"}
+]})
+
+// ⚠️ CRITICAL: Dynamic TodoWrite task attachment strategy:
+//
+// **Key Concept**: SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES tasks to current workflow.
+// Orchestrator EXECUTES these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
+//
+// 1. INITIAL STATE: 4 orchestrator-level tasks only
+//
+// 2. PHASE 1 SlashCommand INVOCATION:
+//    - SlashCommand(/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code) ATTACHES 4 tasks
+//    - TodoWrite expands to: Phase 0 (completed) + 4 import-from-code tasks + Phase 2 + Phase 3
+//    - Orchestrator EXECUTES these 4 tasks sequentially (Phase 1.0 → 1.1 → 1.2 → 1.3)
+//    - First attached task marked as in_progress
+//
+// 3. PHASE 1 TASKS COMPLETED:
+//    - All 4 import-from-code tasks executed and completed
+//    - COLLAPSE completed tasks into Phase 1 summary
+//    - TodoWrite becomes: Phase 0-1 (completed) + Phase 2 + Phase 3
+//
+// 4. PHASE 2 SlashCommand INVOCATION:
+//    - SlashCommand(/workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator) ATTACHES 3 tasks
+//    - TodoWrite expands to: Phase 0-1 (completed) + 3 reference-page-generator tasks + Phase 3
+//    - Orchestrator EXECUTES these 3 tasks sequentially (Phase 2.0 → 2.1 → 2.2)
+//
+// 5. PHASE 2 TASKS COMPLETED:
+//    - All 3 reference-page-generator tasks executed and completed
+//    - COLLAPSE completed tasks into Phase 2 summary
+//    - TodoWrite returns to: Phase 0-2 (completed) + Phase 3 (in_progress)
+//
+// 6. PHASE 3 EXECUTION:
+//    - Orchestrator's own task (no SlashCommand attachment)
+//    - Mark Phase 3 as completed
+//    - Final state: All 4 orchestrator tasks completed
+//
+// Benefits:
+// ✓ Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
+// ✓ Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
+// ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
+// ✓ Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
+```
+
+---
+
+## Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+User triggers: /workflow:ui-design:codify-style ./src --package-name my-style-v1
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite Init] 4 orchestrator-level tasks
+  ├─ Phase 0: Validate parameters and prepare session (in_progress)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (pending)
+  ├─ Phase 2: Reference package generation (pending)
+  └─ Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package (pending)
+  ↓
+[Phase 0] Parameter validation & preparation
+  ├─ Parse positional path parameter
+  ├─ Validate source directory exists
+  ├─ Auto-generate or validate package name
+  ├─ Check package overwrite protection
+  ├─ Create temporary workspace
+  └─ Display configuration summary
+  ↓
+[Phase 0 Complete] → TodoWrite: Phase 0 → completed
+  ↓
+[Phase 1 Invoke] → SlashCommand(/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code) ATTACHES 4 tasks
+  ├─ Phase 0 (completed)
+  ├─ Phase 1.0: Discover and categorize code files (in_progress)  ← ATTACHED
+  ├─ Phase 1.1: Style Agent extraction (pending)                   ← ATTACHED
+  ├─ Phase 1.2: Animation Agent extraction (pending)               ← ATTACHED
+  ├─ Phase 1.3: Layout Agent extraction (pending)                  ← ATTACHED
+  ├─ Phase 2: Reference package generation (pending)
+  └─ Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package (pending)
+  ↓
+[Execute Phase 1.0] → Discover files (orchestrator executes this)
+  ↓
+[Execute Phase 1.1-1.3] → Run 3 agents in parallel (orchestrator executes these)
+  └─ Outputs: design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, animation-tokens.json, layout-templates.json
+  ↓
+[Phase 1 Complete] → TodoWrite: COLLAPSE Phase 1.0-1.3 into Phase 1 summary
+  ↓
+[Phase 2 Invoke] → SlashCommand(/workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator) ATTACHES 3 tasks
+  ├─ Phase 0 (completed)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (completed)        ← COLLAPSED
+  ├─ Phase 2.0: Setup and validation (in_progress)                 ← ATTACHED
+  ├─ Phase 2.1: Prepare component data (pending)                   ← ATTACHED
+  ├─ Phase 2.2: Generate preview pages (pending)                   ← ATTACHED
+  └─ Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package (pending)
+  ↓
+[Execute Phase 2.0] → Setup and validation (orchestrator executes this)
+  ↓
+[Execute Phase 2.1] → Prepare component data (orchestrator executes this)
+  ↓
+[Execute Phase 2.2] → Generate preview pages (orchestrator executes this)
+  └─ Outputs: layout-templates.json, design-tokens.json, animation-tokens.json (optional), preview.html, preview.css
+  ↓
+[Phase 2 Complete] → TodoWrite: COLLAPSE Phase 2.0-2.2 into Phase 2 summary
+  ├─ Phase 0 (completed)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Style extraction from source code (completed)
+  ├─ Phase 2: Reference package generation (completed)             ← COLLAPSED
+  └─ Phase 3: Cleanup and verify package (in_progress)
+  ↓
+[Execute Phase 3] → Orchestrator's own task (no attachment needed)
+  ├─ Remove temporary workspace (.workflow/codify-temp-{timestamp}/)
+  ├─ Verify package directory
+  ├─ Extract component count
+  └─ Display completion summary
+  ↓
+[Phase 3 Complete] → TodoWrite: Phase 3 → completed
+  ├─ Phase 0 (completed)
+  ├─ Phase 1 (completed)
+  ├─ Phase 2 (completed)
+  └─ Phase 3 (completed)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Common Errors
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing --source or --package-name | Required parameters not provided | Provide both flags |
+| Invalid package name | Contains uppercase, special chars | Use lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only |
+| import-from-code failed | Source path invalid or no files found | Verify source path, check glob patterns |
+| reference-page-generator failed | Design run incomplete | Check import-from-code output, verify extraction files |
+| Package verification failed | Output directory creation failed | Check file permissions |
+
+### Error Recovery
+
+- If Phase 2 fails: Cleanup temporary session and report error
+- If Phase 3 fails: Keep design run for debugging, report error
+- User can manually inspect `${design_run_path}` if needed
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Critical Rules
+
+1. **No User Prompts Between Phases**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
+2. **Immediate Phase Transition**: After TodoWrite update, immediately execute next phase command
+3. **Status-Driven Execution**: Check TodoList status after each phase
+4. **Phase Completion Pattern**:
+   ```
+   Phase N completes → Update TodoWrite (N=completed, N+1=in_progress) → Execute Phase N+1
+   ```
+
+### Parameter Pass-Through
+
+Only essential parameters are passed to `import-from-code`:
+- `--design-id` → temporary design run ID (auto-generated)
+- `--source` → user-specified source directory
+
+File discovery is fully automatic - no glob patterns needed.
+
+### Output Directory Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/
+├── reference_style/              # Default output directory
+│   └── {package-name}/
+│       ├── layout-templates.json
+│       ├── design-tokens.json
+│       ├── animation-tokens.json (optional)
+│       ├── preview.html
+│       └── preview.css
+│
+└── codify-temp-{timestamp}/      # Temporary workspace (cleaned up after completion)
+    ├── style-extraction/
+    ├── animation-extraction/
+    └── layout-extraction/
+```
+
+---
+
+## Benefits
+
+- **Simplified Interface**: Single path parameter with intelligent defaults
+- **Auto-Generation**: Package names auto-generated from directory names
+- **Automatic Discovery**: No need to specify file patterns - finds all style files automatically
+- **Pure Orchestrator**: No direct agent execution, delegates to specialized commands
+- **Auto-Continue**: Autonomous 4-phase execution without user interaction
+- **Safety First**: Overwrite protection, validation checks, error handling
+- **Code Reuse**: Leverages existing `import-from-code` and `reference-page-generator` commands
+- **Clean Separation**: Each command has single responsibility
+- **Easy Maintenance**: Changes to sub-commands automatically apply
+
+## Architecture
+
+```
+codify-style (orchestrator - simplified interface)
+  ├─ Phase 0: Intelligent Validation
+  │   ├─ Parse positional path parameter
+  │   ├─ Auto-generate package name (if not provided)
+  │   ├─ Safety checks (overwrite protection)
+  │   └─ User confirmation
+  ├─ Phase 1: /workflow:ui-design:import-from-code (style extraction)
+  │   ├─ Extract design tokens from source code
+  │   ├─ Generate style guide
+  │   └─ Extract component patterns
+  ├─ Phase 2: /workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator (reference package)
+  │   ├─ Generate shareable package
+  │   ├─ Create interactive preview
+  │   └─ Generate documentation
+  └─ Phase 3: Cleanup & Verification
+      ├─ Remove temporary workspace
+      ├─ Verify package integrity
+      └─ Report completion
+
+Design Principles:
+✓ No task JSON created by this command
+✓ All extraction delegated to import-from-code
+✓ All packaging delegated to reference-page-generator
+✓ Pure orchestration with intelligent defaults
+✓ Single path parameter for maximum simplicity
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/consolidate.md

@@ -1,267 +0,0 @@
----
-name: consolidate
-description: Consolidate style variants into independent design systems and plan layout strategies
-argument-hint: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# Design System Consolidation Command
-
-## Overview
-Consolidate style variants into independent production-ready design systems. Refines raw token proposals from `style-extract` into finalized design tokens and style guides.
-
-**Strategy**: Philosophy-Driven Refinement
-- **Agent-Driven**: Uses ui-design-agent for N variant generation
-- **Token Refinement**: Transforms proposed_tokens into complete systems
-- **Production-Ready**: design-tokens.json + style-guide.md per variant
-- **Matrix-Ready**: Provides style variants for generate phase
-
-## Phase 1: Setup & Validation
-
-### Step 1: Resolve Base Path & Load Style Cards
-```bash
-# Determine base path
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
-# OR use --base-path / --session parameters
-
-# Load style cards
-bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
-```
-
-### Step 2: Memory Check (Skip if Already Done)
-```bash
-# Check if already consolidated
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
-```
-
-**If exists**: Skip to completion message
-
-### Step 3: Select Variants
-```bash
-# Determine variant count (default: all from style-cards.json)
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -c "\"id\": \"variant-")
-
-# Validate variant count
-# Priority: --variants parameter → total_variants from style-cards.json
-```
-
-**Output**: `variants_count`, `selected_variants[]`
-
-### Step 4: Load Design Context (Optional)
-```bash
-# Load brainstorming context
-bash(test -f {base_path}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md && cat it)
-
-# Load design space analysis
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json && cat it)
-```
-
-**Output**: `design_context`, `design_space_analysis`
-
-## Phase 2: Design System Synthesis (Agent)
-
-**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` for all variants
-
-### Step 1: Create Output Directories
-```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{{1..{variants_count}}})
-```
-
-### Step 2: Launch Agent Task
-For all variants (1 to {variants_count}):
-```javascript
-Task(ui-design-agent): `
-  [DESIGN_TOKEN_GENERATION_TASK]
-  Generate {variants_count} independent design systems using philosophy-driven refinement
-
-  SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: Philosophy-driven refinement | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
-
-  CRITICAL PATH: Use loop index (N) for directories: style-1/, style-2/, ..., style-N/
-
-  VARIANT DATA:
-  {FOR each variant with index N:
-    VARIANT INDEX: {N} | ID: {variant.id} | NAME: {variant.name}
-    Design Philosophy: {variant.design_philosophy}
-    Proposed Tokens: {variant.proposed_tokens}
-    {IF design_space_analysis: Design Attributes: {attributes}, Anti-keywords: {anti_keywords}}
-  }
-
-  ## 参考
-  - Style cards: Each variant's proposed_tokens and design_philosophy
-  - Design space analysis: design_attributes (saturation, weight, formality, organic/geometric, innovation, density)
-  - Anti-keywords: Explicit constraints to avoid
-  - WCAG AA: 4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI (use built-in AI knowledge)
-
-  ## 生成
-  For EACH variant (use loop index N for paths):
-  1. {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{N}/design-tokens.json
-     - Complete token structure: colors, typography, spacing, border_radius, shadows, breakpoints
-     - All colors in OKLCH format
-     - Apply design_attributes to token values (saturation→chroma, density→spacing, etc.)
-
-  2. {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{N}/style-guide.md
-     - Expanded design philosophy
-     - Complete color system with accessibility notes
-     - Typography documentation
-     - Usage guidelines
-
-  ## 注意
-  - ✅ Use Write() tool immediately for each file
-  - ✅ Use loop index N for directory names: style-1/, style-2/, etc.
-  - ❌ DO NOT use variant.id in paths (metadata only)
-  - ❌ NO external research or MCP calls (pure AI refinement)
-  - Apply philosophy-driven refinement: design_attributes guide token values
-  - Maintain divergence: Use anti_keywords to prevent variant convergence
-  - Complete each variant's files before moving to next variant
-`
-```
-
-**Output**: Agent generates `variants_count × 2` files
-
-## Phase 3: Verify Output
-
-### Step 1: Check Files Created
-```bash
-# Verify all design systems created
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-*/design-tokens.json | wc -l)
-
-# Validate structure
-bash(cat {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
-```
-
-### Step 2: Verify File Sizes
-```bash
-bash(ls -lh {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/)
-```
-
-**Output**: `variants_count × 2` files verified
-
-## Completion
-
-### Todo Update
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {content: "Setup and load style cards", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading style cards"},
-  {content: "Select variants and load context", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading context"},
-  {content: "Generate design systems (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating systems"},
-  {content: "Verify output files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Verifying files"}
-]});
-```
-
-### Output Message
-```
-✅ Design system consolidation complete!
-
-Configuration:
-- Session: {session_id}
-- Variants: {variants_count}
-- Philosophy-driven refinement (zero MCP calls)
-
-Generated Files:
-{base_path}/style-consolidation/
-├── style-1/ (design-tokens.json, style-guide.md)
-├── style-2/ (same structure)
-└── style-{variants_count}/ (same structure)
-
-Next: /workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id} --style-variants {variants_count} --targets "dashboard,auth"
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Path Operations
-```bash
-# Find design directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
-
-# Load style cards
-bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
-
-# Count variants
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -c "\"id\": \"variant-")
-```
-
-### Validation Commands
-```bash
-# Check if already consolidated
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
-
-# Verify output
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-*/design-tokens.json | wc -l)
-
-# Validate structure
-bash(cat design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
-```
-
-### File Operations
-```bash
-# Create directories
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{{1..3}})
-
-# Check file sizes
-bash(ls -lh {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/)
-```
-
-## Output Structure
-
-```
-{base_path}/
-└── style-consolidation/
-    ├── style-1/
-    │   ├── design-tokens.json
-    │   └── style-guide.md
-    ├── style-2/
-    │   ├── design-tokens.json
-    │   └── style-guide.md
-    └── style-N/ (same structure)
-```
-
-## design-tokens.json Format
-
-```json
-{
-  "colors": {
-    "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
-    "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
-    "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
-    "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
-    "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
-  },
-  "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
-  "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", ..., "24": "6rem"},
-  "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", ..., "full": "9999px"},
-  "shadows": {"sm": "...", "md": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "..."},
-  "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
-}
-```
-
-**Requirements**: OKLCH colors, complete coverage, semantic naming
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Common Errors
-```
-ERROR: No style cards found
-→ Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first
-
-ERROR: Invalid variant count
-→ List available count, auto-select all
-
-ERROR: Agent file creation failed
-→ Check agent output, verify Write() operations
-```
-
-## Key Features
-
-- **Philosophy-Driven Refinement** - Pure AI token refinement using design_attributes
-- **Agent-Driven** - Uses ui-design-agent for multi-file generation
-- **Separate Design Systems** - N independent systems (one per variant)
-- **Production-Ready** - WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors, semantic naming
-- **Zero MCP Calls** - Faster execution, better divergence preservation
-
-## Integration
-
-**Input**: `style-cards.json` from `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract`
-**Output**: `style-consolidation/style-{N}/` for each variant
-**Next**: `/workflow:ui-design:generate --style-variants N`
-
-**Note**: After consolidate, use `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` to generate layout templates before running generate.

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/design-sync.md

@@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
+---
+name: design-sync
+description: Synchronize finalized design system references to brainstorming artifacts, preparing them for /workflow:plan consumption
+argument-hint: --session <session_id> [--selected-prototypes "<list>"]
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Design Sync Command
+
+## Overview
+
+Synchronize finalized design system references to brainstorming artifacts, preparing them for `/workflow:plan` consumption. This command updates **references only** (via @ notation), not content duplication.
+
+## Core Philosophy
+
+- **Reference-Only Updates**: Use @ references, no content duplication
+- **Main Claude Execution**: Direct updates by main Claude (no Agent handoff)
+- **Synthesis Alignment**: Update role analysis documents UI/UX Guidelines section
+- **Plan-Ready Output**: Ensure design artifacts discoverable by task-generate
+- **Minimal Reading**: Verify file existence, don't read design content
+
+## Execution Protocol
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Artifact Validation
+
+```bash
+# Validate session
+CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files; VALIDATE: session_id matches active session
+
+# Verify design artifacts in latest design run
+latest_design = find_latest_path_matching(".workflow/WFS-{session}/design-run-*")
+
+# Detect design system structure
+IF exists({latest_design}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json):
+    design_system_mode = "separate"; design_tokens_path = "style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json"; style_guide_path = "style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md"
+ELSE:
+    ERROR: "No design tokens found. Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first"
+
+VERIFY: {latest_design}/{design_tokens_path}, {latest_design}/{style_guide_path}, {latest_design}/prototypes/*.html
+
+REPORT: "📋 Design system mode: {design_system_mode} | Tokens: {design_tokens_path}"
+
+# Prototype selection
+selected_list = --selected-prototypes ? parse_comma_separated(--selected-prototypes) : Glob({latest_design}/prototypes/*.html)
+VALIDATE: Specified prototypes exist IF --selected-prototypes
+
+REPORT: "Found {count} design artifacts, {prototype_count} prototypes"
+```
+
+### Phase 1.1: Memory Check (Skip if Already Updated)
+
+```bash
+# Check if role analysis documents contains current design run reference
+synthesis_spec_path = ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/role analysis documents"
+current_design_run = basename(latest_design)  # e.g., "design-run-20250109-143022"
+
+IF exists(synthesis_spec_path):
+    synthesis_content = Read(synthesis_spec_path)
+    IF "## UI/UX Guidelines" in synthesis_content AND current_design_run in synthesis_content:
+        REPORT: "✅ Design system references already updated (found in memory)"
+        REPORT: "   Skipping: Phase 2-5 (Load Target Artifacts, Update Synthesis, Update UI Designer Guide, Completion)"
+        EXIT 0
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Load Target Artifacts Only
+
+**What to Load**: Only the files we need to **update**, not the design files we're referencing.
+
+```bash
+# Load target brainstorming artifacts (files to be updated)
+Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/role analysis documents)
+IF exists(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md): Read(analysis.md)
+
+# Optional: Read prototype notes for descriptions (minimal context)
+FOR each selected_prototype IN selected_list:
+    Read({latest_design}/prototypes/{selected_prototype}-notes.md)  # Extract: layout_strategy, page_name only
+
+# Note: Do NOT read design-tokens.json, style-guide.md, or prototype HTML. Only verify existence and generate @ references.
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Update Synthesis Specification
+
+Update `.brainstorming/role analysis documents` with design system references.
+
+**Target Section**: `## UI/UX Guidelines`
+
+**Content Template**:
+```markdown
+## UI/UX Guidelines
+
+### Design System Reference
+**Finalized Design Tokens**: @../{design_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+**Style Guide**: @../{design_id}/{style_guide_path}
+**Design System Mode**: {design_system_mode}
+
+### Implementation Requirements
+**Token Adherence**: All UI implementations MUST use design token CSS custom properties
+**Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance validated in design-tokens.json
+**Responsive**: Mobile-first design using token-based breakpoints
+**Component Patterns**: Follow patterns documented in style-guide.md
+
+### Reference Prototypes
+{FOR each selected_prototype:
+- **{page_name}**: @../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html | Layout: {layout_strategy from notes}
+}
+
+### Design System Assets
+```json
+{"design_tokens": "{design_id}/{design_tokens_path}", "style_guide": "{design_id}/{style_guide_path}", "design_system_mode": "{design_system_mode}", "prototypes": [{FOR each: "{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html"}]}
+```
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+# Option 1: Edit existing section
+Edit(file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/role analysis documents",
+     old_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n[existing content]",
+     new_string="## UI/UX Guidelines\n\n[new design reference content]")
+
+# Option 2: Append if section doesn't exist
+IF section not found:
+    Edit(file_path="...", old_string="[end of document]", new_string="\n\n## UI/UX Guidelines\n\n[new design reference content]")
+```
+
+### Phase 4A: Update Relevant Role Analysis Documents
+
+**Discovery**: Find role analysis.md files affected by design outputs
+
+```bash
+# Always update ui-designer
+ui_designer_files = Glob(".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis*.md")
+
+# Conditionally update other roles
+has_animations = exists({latest_design}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json)
+has_layouts = exists({latest_design}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
+
+IF has_animations: ux_expert_files = Glob(".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/analysis*.md")
+IF has_layouts: architect_files = Glob(".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis*.md")
+IF selected_list: pm_files = Glob(".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis*.md")
+```
+
+**Content Templates**:
+
+**ui-designer/analysis.md** (append if not exists):
+```markdown
+## Design System Implementation Reference
+
+**Design Tokens**: @../../{design_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+**Style Guide**: @../../{design_id}/{style_guide_path}
+**Prototypes**: {FOR each: @../../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html}
+
+*Reference added by /workflow:ui-design:update*
+```
+
+**ux-expert/analysis.md** (if animations):
+```markdown
+## Animation & Interaction Reference
+
+**Animations**: @../../{design_id}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json
+**Prototypes**: {FOR each: @../../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html}
+
+*Reference added by /workflow:ui-design:update*
+```
+
+**system-architect/analysis.md** (if layouts):
+```markdown
+## Layout Structure Reference
+
+**Layout Templates**: @../../{design_id}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json
+
+*Reference added by /workflow:ui-design:update*
+```
+
+**product-manager/analysis.md** (if prototypes):
+```markdown
+## Prototype Validation Reference
+
+**Prototypes**: {FOR each: @../../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html}
+
+*Reference added by /workflow:ui-design:update*
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+FOR file IN [ui_designer_files, ux_expert_files, architect_files, pm_files]:
+  IF file exists AND section_not_exists(file):
+    Edit(file, old_string="[end of document]", new_string="\n\n{role-specific section}")
+```
+
+### Phase 4B: Create UI Designer Design System Reference
+
+Create or update `.brainstorming/ui-designer/design-system-reference.md`:
+
+```markdown
+# UI Designer Design System Reference
+
+## Design System Integration
+This style guide references the finalized design system from the design refinement phase.
+
+**Design Tokens**: @../../{design_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+**Style Guide**: @../../{design_id}/{style_guide_path}
+**Design System Mode**: {design_system_mode}
+
+## Implementation Guidelines
+1. **Use CSS Custom Properties**: All styles reference design tokens
+2. **Follow Semantic HTML**: Use HTML5 semantic elements
+3. **Maintain Accessibility**: WCAG AA compliance required
+4. **Responsive Design**: Mobile-first with token-based breakpoints
+
+## Reference Prototypes
+{FOR each selected_prototype:
+- **{page_name}**: @../../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+}
+
+## Token System
+For complete token definitions and usage examples, see:
+- Design Tokens: @../../{design_id}/{design_tokens_path}
+- Style Guide: @../../{design_id}/{style_guide_path}
+
+---
+*Auto-generated by /workflow:ui-design:update | Last updated: {timestamp}*
+```
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+Write(file_path=".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/design-system-reference.md",
+      content="[generated content with @ references]")
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Completion
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {content: "Validate session and design system artifacts", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating artifacts"},
+  {content: "Load target brainstorming artifacts", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading target files"},
+  {content: "Update role analysis documents with design references", status: "completed", activeForm: "Updating synthesis spec"},
+  {content: "Update relevant role analysis.md documents", status: "completed", activeForm: "Updating role analysis files"},
+  {content: "Create/update ui-designer/design-system-reference.md", status: "completed", activeForm: "Creating design system reference"}
+]});
+```
+
+**Completion Message**:
+```
+✅ Design system references updated for session: WFS-{session}
+
+Updated artifacts:
+✓ role analysis documents - UI/UX Guidelines section with @ references
+✓ {role_count} role analysis.md files - Design system references
+✓ ui-designer/design-system-reference.md - Design system reference guide
+
+Design system assets ready for /workflow:plan:
+- design-tokens.json | style-guide.md | {prototype_count} reference prototypes
+
+Next: /workflow:plan [--agent] "<task description>"
+      The plan phase will automatically discover and utilize the design system.
+```
+
+## Output Structure
+
+**Updated Files**:
+```
+.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+├── role analysis documents              # Updated with UI/UX Guidelines section
+├── ui-designer/
+│   ├── analysis*.md                     # Updated with design system references
+│   └── design-system-reference.md       # New or updated design reference guide
+├── ux-expert/analysis*.md               # Updated if animations exist
+├── product-manager/analysis*.md         # Updated if prototypes exist
+└── system-architect/analysis*.md        # Updated if layouts exist
+```
+
+**@ Reference Format** (role analysis documents):
+```
+@../{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
+@../{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md
+@../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+```
+
+**@ Reference Format** (ui-designer/design-system-reference.md):
+```
+@../../{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
+@../../{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md
+@../../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+```
+
+**@ Reference Format** (role analysis.md files):
+```
+@../../{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json
+@../../{design_id}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json
+@../../{design_id}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json
+@../../{design_id}/prototypes/{prototype}.html
+```
+
+## Integration with /workflow:plan
+
+After this update, `/workflow:plan` will discover design assets through:
+
+**Phase 3: Intelligent Analysis** (`/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced`)
+- Reads role analysis documents → Discovers @ references → Includes design system context in ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+**Phase 4: Task Generation** (`/workflow:tools:task-generate`)
+- Reads ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md → Discovers design assets → Includes design system paths in task JSON files
+
+**Example Task JSON** (generated by task-generate):
+```json
+{
+  "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+  "context": {
+    "design_system": {
+      "tokens": "{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json",
+      "style_guide": "{design_id}/style-extraction/style-1/style-guide.md",
+      "prototypes": ["{design_id}/prototypes/dashboard-variant-1.html"]
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Missing design artifacts**: Error with message "Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract and /workflow:ui-design:generate first"
+- **role analysis documents not found**: Warning, create minimal version with just UI/UX Guidelines
+- **ui-designer/ directory missing**: Create directory and file
+- **Edit conflicts**: Preserve existing content, append or replace only UI/UX Guidelines section
+- **Invalid prototype names**: Skip invalid entries, continue with valid ones
+
+## Validation Checks
+
+After update, verify:
+- [ ] role analysis documents contains UI/UX Guidelines section
+- [ ] UI/UX Guidelines include @ references (not content duplication)
+- [ ] ui-designer/analysis*.md updated with design system references
+- [ ] ui-designer/design-system-reference.md created or updated
+- [ ] Relevant role analysis.md files updated (ux-expert, product-manager, system-architect)
+- [ ] All @ referenced files exist and are accessible
+- [ ] @ reference paths are relative and correct
+
+## Key Features
+
+1. **Reference-Only Updates**: Uses @ notation for file references, no content duplication, lightweight and maintainable
+2. **Main Claude Direct Execution**: No Agent handoff (preserves context), simple reference generation, reliable path resolution
+3. **Plan-Ready Output**: `/workflow:plan` Phase 3 can discover design system, task generation includes design asset paths, clear integration points
+4. **Minimal Reading**: Only reads target files to update, verifies design file existence (no content reading), optional prototype notes for descriptions
+5. **Flexible Prototype Selection**: Auto-select all prototypes (default), manual selection via --selected-prototypes parameter, validates existence
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- **Input**: Design system artifacts from `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` and `/workflow:ui-design:generate`
+- **Output**: Updated role analysis documents, role analysis.md files, ui-designer/design-system-reference.md with @ references
+- **Next Phase**: `/workflow:plan` discovers and utilizes design system through @ references
+- **Auto Integration**: Automatically triggered by `/workflow:ui-design:auto` workflow
+

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/explore-auto.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: explore-auto
-description: Exploratory UI design workflow with style-centric batch generation
-argument-hint: "[--prompt "<desc>"] [--images "<glob>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>] [--batch-plan]""
+description: Interactive exploratory UI design workflow with style-centric batch generation, creates design variants from prompts/images with parallel execution and user selection
+argument-hint: "[--input "<value>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--target-type "page|component"] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*), Task(conceptual-planning-agent)
 ---
 
@@ -18,35 +18,60 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 
 **Autonomous Flow** (⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION - DO NOT STOP):
 1. User triggers: `/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto [params]`
-2. Phase 0c: Target confirmation → User confirms → **IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 1**
-3. Phase 1 (style-extract) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-4. Phase 2 (style-consolidate) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-5. Phase 2.5 (layout-extract) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-6. **Phase 3 (ui-assembly)** → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-7. Phase 4 (design-update) → **WAIT for completion** → Auto-continues
-8. Phase 5 (batch-plan, optional) → Reports completion
+2. Phase 5: Target confirmation → User confirms → **IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 7**
+3. Phase 7 (style-extract) → **Attach tasks → Execute → Collapse** → Auto-continues to Phase 8
+4. Phase 8 (animation-extract, conditional):
+   - **IF should_extract_animation**: **Attach tasks → Execute → Collapse** → Auto-continues to Phase 9
+   - **ELSE**: Skip (use code import) → Auto-continues to Phase 9
+5. Phase 9 (layout-extract) → **Attach tasks → Execute → Collapse** → Auto-continues to Phase 10
+6. **Phase 10 (ui-assembly)** → **Attach tasks → Execute → Collapse** → Auto-continues to Phase 11
+7. **Phase 11 (preview-generation)** → **Execute script → Generate preview files** → Reports completion
 
 **Phase Transition Mechanism**:
-- **Phase 0c (User Interaction)**: User confirms targets → IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 1
-- **Phase 1-5 (Autonomous)**: `SlashCommand` is BLOCKING - execution pauses until completion
-- Upon each phase completion: Automatically process output and execute next phase
-- No additional user interaction after Phase 0c confirmation
+- **Phase 5 (User Interaction)**: User confirms targets → IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 7
+- **Phase 7-10 (Autonomous)**: `SlashCommand` invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow
+- **Task Execution**: Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself
+- **Task Collapse**: After tasks complete, collapse them into phase summary
+- **Phase Transition**: Automatically execute next phase after collapsing
+- **Phase 11 (Script Execution)**: Execute preview generation script
+- No additional user interaction after Phase 5 confirmation
 
-**Auto-Continue Mechanism**: TodoWrite tracks phase status. Upon each phase completion, you MUST immediately construct and execute the next phase command. No user intervention required. The workflow is NOT complete until reaching Phase 4 (or Phase 5 if --batch-plan).
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**: TodoWrite tracks phase status with dynamic task attachment/collapse. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them, restore phase summary, and execute the next phase. No user intervention required. The workflow is NOT complete until reaching Phase 11 (preview generation).
+
+**Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation is NOT delegation - it's task expansion. The orchestrator executes these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
 
 **Target Type Detection**: Automatically inferred from prompt/targets, or explicitly set via `--target-type`.
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Start Immediately**: TodoWrite initialization → Phase 1 execution
+1. **Start Immediately**: TodoWrite initialization → Phase 7 execution
 2. **No Preliminary Validation**: Sub-commands handle their own validation
 3. **Parse & Pass**: Extract data from each output for next phase
 4. **Default to All**: When selecting variants/prototypes, use ALL generated items
-5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after each phase
-6. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP** - This is a continuous multi-phase workflow. After each SlashCommand completes, you MUST wait for completion, then immediately execute the next phase. Workflow is NOT complete until Phase 4 (or Phase 5 if --batch-plan).
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+6. **⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Attachment Model** - SlashCommand invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion. This is NOT delegation - it's task expansion.
+7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP** - This is a continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them and execute the next phase. Workflow is NOT complete until Phase 11 (preview generation).
 
 ## Parameter Requirements
 
+**Recommended Parameter**:
+- `--input "<value>"`: Unified input source (auto-detects type)
+  - **Glob pattern** (images): `"design-refs/*"`, `"screenshots/*.png"`
+  - **File/directory path** (code): `"./src/components"`, `"/path/to/styles"`
+  - **Text description** (prompt): `"modern dashboard with 3 styles"`, `"minimalist design"`
+  - **Combination**: `"design-refs/* modern dashboard"` (glob + description)
+  - Multiple inputs: Separate with `|` → `"design-refs/*|modern style"`
+
+**Detection Logic**:
+- Contains `*` or matches existing files → **glob pattern** (images)
+- Existing file/directory path → **code import**
+- Pure text without paths → **design prompt**
+- Contains `|` separator → **multiple inputs** (glob|prompt or path|prompt)
+
+**Legacy Parameters** (deprecated, use `--input` instead):
+- `--images "<glob>"`: Reference image paths (shows deprecation warning)
+- `--prompt "<description>"`: Design description (shows deprecation warning)
+
 **Optional Parameters** (all have smart defaults):
 - `--targets "<list>"`: Comma-separated targets (pages/components) to generate (inferred from prompt/session if omitted)
 - `--target-type "page|component|auto"`: Explicitly set target type (default: `auto` - intelligent detection)
@@ -56,19 +81,16 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
   - **Tablet**: 768×1024px - Hybrid touch/mouse layouts
   - **Responsive**: 1920×1080px base with mobile-first breakpoints
 - `--session <id>`: Workflow session ID (standalone mode if omitted)
-- `--images "<glob>"`: Reference image paths (default: `design-refs/*`)
-- `--prompt "<description>"`: Design style and target description
 - `--style-variants <count>`: Style variants (default: inferred from prompt or 3, range: 1-5)
 - `--layout-variants <count>`: Layout variants per style (default: inferred or 3, range: 1-5)
-- `--batch-plan`: Auto-generate implementation tasks after design-update
 
-**Legacy Parameters** (maintained for backward compatibility):
+**Legacy Target Parameters** (maintained for backward compatibility):
 - `--pages "<list>"`: Alias for `--targets` with `--target-type page`
 - `--components "<list>"`: Alias for `--targets` with `--target-type component`
 
 **Input Rules**:
-- Must provide at least one: `--images` or `--prompt` or `--targets`
-- Multiple parameters can be combined for guided analysis
+- Must provide: `--input` OR (legacy: `--images`/`--prompt`) OR `--targets`
+- `--input` can combine multiple input types
 - If `--targets` not provided, intelligently inferred from prompt/session
 
 **Supported Target Types**:
@@ -91,8 +113,8 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 
 **Matrix Mode** (style-centric):
 - Generates `style_variants × layout_variants × targets` prototypes
-- **Phase 1**: `style_variants` style options with design_attributes (extract)
-- **Phase 2**: `style_variants` independent design systems (consolidate)
+- **Phase 1**: `style_variants` complete design systems (extract)
+- **Phase 2**: Layout templates extraction (layout-extract)
 - **Phase 3**: Style-centric batch generation (generate)
   - Sub-phase 1: `targets × layout_variants` target-specific layout plans
   - **Sub-phase 2**: `S` style-centric agents (each handles `L×T` combinations)
@@ -105,22 +127,97 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 **Integrated vs. Standalone**:
 - `--session` flag determines session integration or standalone execution
 
-## 6-Phase Execution
+## 11-Phase Execution
 
-### Phase 0a: Intelligent Prompt Parsing
+### Phase 1: Parameter Parsing & Input Detection
+```bash
+# Step 0: Parse and normalize parameters
+images_input = null
+prompt_text = null
+
+# Handle legacy parameters with deprecation warning
+IF --images OR --prompt:
+    WARN: "⚠️  DEPRECATION: --images and --prompt are deprecated. Use --input instead."
+    WARN: "   Example: --input \"design-refs/*\" or --input \"modern dashboard\""
+    images_input = --images
+    prompt_text = --prompt
+
+# Parse unified --input parameter
+IF --input:
+    # Split by | separator for multiple inputs
+    input_parts = split(--input, "|")
+
+    FOR part IN input_parts:
+        part = trim(part)
+
+        # Detection logic
+        IF contains(part, "*") OR glob_matches_files(part):
+            # Glob pattern detected → images
+            images_input = part
+        ELSE IF file_or_directory_exists(part):
+            # File/directory path → will be handled in code detection
+            IF NOT prompt_text:
+                prompt_text = part
+            ELSE:
+                prompt_text = prompt_text + " " + part
+        ELSE:
+            # Pure text → prompt
+            IF NOT prompt_text:
+                prompt_text = part
+            ELSE:
+                prompt_text = prompt_text + " " + part
+
+# Step 1: Detect design source from parsed inputs
+code_files_detected = false
+code_base_path = null
+has_visual_input = false
+
+IF prompt_text:
+    # Extract potential file paths from prompt
+    potential_paths = extract_paths_from_text(prompt_text)
+    FOR path IN potential_paths:
+        IF file_or_directory_exists(path):
+            code_files_detected = true
+            code_base_path = path
+            BREAK
+
+IF images_input:
+    # Check if images parameter points to existing files
+    IF glob_matches_files(images_input):
+        has_visual_input = true
+
+# Step 2: Determine design source strategy
+design_source = "unknown"
+IF code_files_detected AND has_visual_input:
+    design_source = "hybrid"  # Both code and visual
+ELSE IF code_files_detected:
+    design_source = "code_only"  # Only code files
+ELSE IF has_visual_input OR --prompt:
+    design_source = "visual_only"  # Only visual/prompt
+ELSE:
+    ERROR: "No design source provided (code files, images, or prompt required)"
+    EXIT 1
+
+STORE: design_source, code_base_path, has_visual_input
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Intelligent Prompt Parsing
 ```bash
 # Parse variant counts from prompt or use explicit/default values
-IF --prompt AND (NOT --style-variants OR NOT --layout-variants):
-    style_variants = regex_extract(prompt, r"(\d+)\s*style") OR --style-variants OR 3
-    layout_variants = regex_extract(prompt, r"(\d+)\s*layout") OR --layout-variants OR 3
+IF prompt_text AND (NOT --style-variants OR NOT --layout-variants):
+    style_variants = regex_extract(prompt_text, r"(\d+)\s*style") OR --style-variants OR 3
+    layout_variants = regex_extract(prompt_text, r"(\d+)\s*layout") OR --layout-variants OR 3
 ELSE:
     style_variants = --style-variants OR 3
     layout_variants = --layout-variants OR 3
 
 VALIDATE: 1 <= style_variants <= 5, 1 <= layout_variants <= 5
+
+# Interactive mode (always enabled)
+interactive_mode = true  # Always use interactive mode
 ```
 
-### Phase 0a-2: Device Type Inference
+### Phase 3: Device Type Inference
 ```bash
 # Device type inference
 device_type = "auto"
@@ -131,14 +228,14 @@ IF --device-type AND --device-type != "auto":
     device_source = "explicit"
 ELSE:
     # Step 2: Prompt analysis
-    IF --prompt:
+    IF prompt_text:
         device_keywords = {
             "desktop": ["desktop", "web", "laptop", "widescreen", "large screen"],
             "mobile": ["mobile", "phone", "smartphone", "ios", "android"],
             "tablet": ["tablet", "ipad", "medium screen"],
             "responsive": ["responsive", "adaptive", "multi-device", "cross-platform"]
         }
-        detected_device = detect_device_from_prompt(--prompt, device_keywords)
+        detected_device = detect_device_from_prompt(prompt_text, device_keywords)
         IF detected_device:
             device_type = detected_device
             device_source = "prompt_inference"
@@ -165,27 +262,36 @@ STORE: device_type, device_source
 - Prompt contains "responsive", "adaptive" → responsive
 - Otherwise: Inferred from target type (components→desktop, pages→responsive)
 
-### Phase 0b: Run Initialization & Directory Setup
+### Phase 4: Run Initialization & Directory Setup
 ```bash
-run_id = "run-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
-base_path = --session ? ".workflow/WFS-{session}/design-${run_id}" : ".workflow/.design/${run_id}"
+design_id = "design-run-$(date +%Y%m%d)-$RANDOM"
+relative_base_path = --session ? ".workflow/WFS-{session}/${design_id}" : ".workflow/${design_id}"
 
-Bash(mkdir -p "${base_path}/{style-extraction,style-consolidation,prototypes}")
+# Create directory and convert to absolute path
+Bash(mkdir -p "${relative_base_path}/style-extraction")
+Bash(mkdir -p "${relative_base_path}/prototypes")
+base_path=$(cd "${relative_base_path}" && pwd)
 
 Write({base_path}/.run-metadata.json): {
-  "run_id": "${run_id}", "session_id": "${session_id}", "timestamp": "...",
+  "design_id": "${design_id}", "session_id": "${session_id}", "timestamp": "...",
   "workflow": "ui-design:auto",
   "architecture": "style-centric-batch-generation",
   "parameters": { "style_variants": ${style_variants}, "layout_variants": ${layout_variants},
                   "targets": "${inferred_target_list}", "target_type": "${target_type}",
-                  "prompt": "${prompt_text}", "images": "${images_pattern}",
+                  "prompt": "${prompt_text}", "images": "${images_input}",
+                  "input": "${--input}",
                   "device_type": "${device_type}", "device_source": "${device_source}" },
   "status": "in_progress",
   "performance_mode": "optimized"
 }
+
+# Initialize default flags for animation extraction logic
+animation_complete = false  # Default: always extract animations unless code import proves complete
+needs_visual_supplement = false  # Will be set to true in hybrid mode
+skip_animation_extraction = false  # User preference for code import scenario
 ```
 
-### Phase 0c: Unified Target Inference with Intelligent Type Detection
+### Phase 5: Unified Target Inference with Intelligent Type Detection
 ```bash
 # Priority: --pages/--components (legacy) → --targets → --prompt analysis → synthesis → default
 target_list = []; target_type = "auto"; target_source = "none"
@@ -198,14 +304,14 @@ ELSE IF --targets:
     target_type = --target-type != "auto" ? --target-type : detect_target_type(target_list)
 
 # Step 3: Prompt analysis (Claude internal analysis)
-ELSE IF --prompt:
-    analysis_result = analyze_prompt("{prompt_text}")  # Extract targets, types, purpose
+ELSE IF prompt_text:
+    analysis_result = analyze_prompt(prompt_text)  # Extract targets, types, purpose
     target_list = analysis_result.targets
     target_type = analysis_result.primary_type OR detect_target_type(target_list)
     target_source = "prompt_analysis"
 
 # Step 4: Session synthesis
-ELSE IF --session AND exists(synthesis-specification.md):
+ELSE IF --session AND exists(role analysis documents):
     target_list = extract_targets_from_synthesis(); target_type = "page"; target_source = "synthesis"
 
 # Step 5: Fallback
@@ -250,7 +356,7 @@ MATCH user_input:
 
 STORE: inferred_target_list, target_type, target_inference_source
 
-# ⚠️ CRITICAL: User confirmation complete, IMMEDIATELY initialize TodoWrite and execute Phase 1
+# ⚠️ CRITICAL: User confirmation complete, IMMEDIATELY initialize TodoWrite and execute Phase 7
 # This is the only user interaction point in the workflow
 # After this point, all subsequent phases execute automatically without user intervention
 ```
@@ -267,171 +373,297 @@ detect_target_type(target_list):
     RETURN "component" IF component_matches > page_matches ELSE "page"
 ```
 
-### Phase 1: Style Extraction
+### Phase 6: Code Import & Completeness Assessment (Conditional)
 ```bash
-command = "/workflow:ui-design:style-extract --base-path \"{base_path}\" " +
-          (--images ? "--images \"{images}\" " : "") +
-          (--prompt ? "--prompt \"{prompt}\" " : "") +
-          "--mode explore --variants {style_variants}"
-SlashCommand(command)
+IF design_source IN ["code_only", "hybrid"]:
+    REPORT: "🔍 Phase 6: Code Import ({design_source})"
+    command = "/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code --design-id \"{design_id}\" --source \"{code_base_path}\""
 
-# Output: {style_variants} style cards with design_attributes
-# SlashCommand blocks until phase complete
-# Upon completion, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 2 (auto-continue)
+    TRY:
+        # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES import-from-code's tasks to current workflow
+        # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself:
+        #   - Phase 0: Discover and categorize code files
+        #   - Phase 1.1-1.3: Style/Animation/Layout Agent extraction
+        SlashCommand(command)
+    CATCH error:
+        WARN: "⚠️ Code import failed: {error}"
+        WARN: "Cleaning up incomplete import directories"
+        Bash(rm -rf "{base_path}/style-extraction" "{base_path}/animation-extraction" "{base_path}/layout-extraction" 2>/dev/null)
+
+        IF design_source == "code_only":
+            REPORT: "Cannot proceed with code-only mode after import failure"
+            EXIT 1
+        ELSE:  # hybrid mode
+            WARN: "Continuing with visual-only mode"
+            design_source = "visual_only"
+
+    # Check file existence and assess completeness
+    style_exists = exists("{base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json")
+    animation_exists = exists("{base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json")
+    layout_count = bash(ls {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-*.json 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+    layout_exists = (layout_count > 0)
+
+    style_complete = false
+    animation_complete = false
+    layout_complete = false
+    missing_categories = []
+
+    # Style completeness check
+    IF style_exists:
+        tokens = Read("{base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json")
+        style_complete = (
+            tokens.colors?.brand && tokens.colors?.surface &&
+            tokens.typography?.font_family && tokens.spacing &&
+            Object.keys(tokens.colors.brand || {}).length >= 3 &&
+            Object.keys(tokens.spacing || {}).length >= 8
+        )
+        IF NOT style_complete AND tokens._metadata?.completeness?.missing_categories:
+            missing_categories.extend(tokens._metadata.completeness.missing_categories)
+    ELSE:
+        missing_categories.push("style tokens")
+
+    # Animation completeness check
+    IF animation_exists:
+        anim = Read("{base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json")
+        animation_complete = (
+            anim.duration && anim.easing &&
+            Object.keys(anim.duration || {}).length >= 3 &&
+            Object.keys(anim.easing || {}).length >= 3
+        )
+        IF NOT animation_complete AND anim._metadata?.completeness?.missing_items:
+            missing_categories.extend(anim._metadata.completeness.missing_items)
+    ELSE:
+        missing_categories.push("animation tokens")
+
+    # Layout completeness check
+    IF layout_exists:
+        # Read first layout file to verify structure
+        first_layout = bash(ls {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-*.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)
+        layout_data = Read(first_layout)
+        layout_complete = (
+            layout_count >= 1 &&
+            layout_data.template?.dom_structure &&
+            layout_data.template?.css_layout_rules
+        )
+        IF NOT layout_complete:
+            missing_categories.push("complete layout structure")
+    ELSE:
+        missing_categories.push("layout templates")
+
+    needs_visual_supplement = false
+
+    IF design_source == "code_only" AND NOT (style_complete AND layout_complete):
+        REPORT: "⚠️  Missing: {', '.join(missing_categories)}"
+        REPORT: "Options: 'continue' | 'supplement: <images>' | 'cancel'"
+        user_response = WAIT_FOR_USER_INPUT()
+        MATCH user_response:
+            "continue" → needs_visual_supplement = false
+            "supplement: ..." → needs_visual_supplement = true; --images = extract_path(user_response)
+            "cancel" → EXIT 0
+            default → needs_visual_supplement = false
+    ELSE IF design_source == "hybrid":
+        needs_visual_supplement = true
+
+    # Animation reuse confirmation (code import with complete animations)
+    IF design_source == "code_only" AND animation_complete:
+        REPORT: "✅ 检测到完整的动画系统（来自代码导入）"
+        REPORT: "   Duration scales: {duration_count} | Easing functions: {easing_count}"
+        REPORT: ""
+        REPORT: "Options:"
+        REPORT: "  • 'reuse' (默认) - 复用已有动画系统"
+        REPORT: "  • 'regenerate' - 重新生成动画系统（交互式）"
+        REPORT: "  • 'cancel' - 取消工作流"
+        user_response = WAIT_FOR_USER_INPUT()
+        MATCH user_response:
+            "reuse" → skip_animation_extraction = true
+            "regenerate" → skip_animation_extraction = false
+            "cancel" → EXIT 0
+            default → skip_animation_extraction = true  # Default: reuse
+
+    STORE: needs_visual_supplement, style_complete, animation_complete, layout_complete, skip_animation_extraction
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Style Consolidation
+### Phase 7: Style Extraction
 ```bash
-command = "/workflow:ui-design:consolidate --base-path \"{base_path}\" " +
-          "--variants {style_variants}"
-SlashCommand(command)
+IF design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement:
+    REPORT: "🎨 Phase 7: Style Extraction (variants: {style_variants})"
+    command = "/workflow:ui-design:style-extract --design-id \"{design_id}\" " +
+              (images_input ? "--images \"{images_input}\" " : "") +
+              (prompt_text ? "--prompt \"{prompt_text}\" " : "") +
+              "--variants {style_variants} --interactive"
 
-# Output: {style_variants} independent design systems with tokens.css
-# SlashCommand blocks until phase complete
-# Upon completion, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 2.5 (auto-continue)
+    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES style-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
+    SlashCommand(command)
+
+    # After executing all attached tasks, collapse them into phase summary
+ELSE:
+    REPORT: "✅ Phase 7: Style (Using Code Import)"
 ```
 
-### Phase 2.5: Layout Extraction
+### Phase 8: Animation Extraction
+```bash
+# Determine if animation extraction is needed
+should_extract_animation = false
+
+IF (design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement):
+    # Pure visual input or hybrid mode requiring visual supplement
+    should_extract_animation = true
+ELSE IF NOT animation_complete:
+    # Code import but animations are incomplete
+    should_extract_animation = true
+ELSE IF design_source == "code_only" AND animation_complete AND NOT skip_animation_extraction:
+    # Code import with complete animations, but user chose to regenerate
+    should_extract_animation = true
+
+IF should_extract_animation:
+    REPORT: "🚀 Phase 8: Animation Extraction"
+
+    # Build command with available inputs
+    command_parts = [f"/workflow:ui-design:animation-extract --design-id \"{design_id}\""]
+
+    IF images_input:
+        command_parts.append(f"--images \"{images_input}\"")
+
+    IF prompt_text:
+        command_parts.append(f"--prompt \"{prompt_text}\"")
+
+    command_parts.append("--interactive")
+
+    command = " ".join(command_parts)
+
+    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES animation-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
+    SlashCommand(command)
+
+    # After executing all attached tasks, collapse them into phase summary
+ELSE:
+    REPORT: "✅ Phase 8: Animation (Using Code Import)"
+
+# Output: animation-tokens.json + animation-guide.md
+# When phase finishes, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 9 (auto-continue)
+```
+
+### Phase 9: Layout Extraction
 ```bash
 targets_string = ",".join(inferred_target_list)
-command = "/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --base-path \"{base_path}\" " +
-          (--images ? "--images \"{images}\" " : "") +
-          (--prompt ? "--prompt \"{prompt}\" " : "") +
-          "--targets \"{targets_string}\" " +
-          "--mode explore --variants {layout_variants} " +
-          "--device-type \"{device_type}\""
 
-REPORT: "🚀 Phase 2.5: Layout Extraction (explore mode)"
-REPORT: "   → Targets: {targets_string}"
-REPORT: "   → Layout variants: {layout_variants}"
-REPORT: "   → Device: {device_type}"
+IF (design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement) OR (NOT layout_complete):
+    REPORT: "🚀 Phase 9: Layout Extraction ({targets_string}, variants: {layout_variants}, device: {device_type})"
+    command = "/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --design-id \"{design_id}\" " +
+              (images_input ? "--images \"{images_input}\" " : "") +
+              (prompt_text ? "--prompt \"{prompt_text}\" " : "") +
+              "--targets \"{targets_string}\" --variants {layout_variants} --device-type \"{device_type}\" --interactive"
 
-SlashCommand(command)
+    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES layout-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
+    SlashCommand(command)
 
-# Output: layout-templates.json with {targets × layout_variants} layout structures
-# SlashCommand blocks until phase complete
-# Upon completion, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 3 (auto-continue)
+    # After executing all attached tasks, collapse them into phase summary
+ELSE:
+    REPORT: "✅ Phase 9: Layout (Using Code Import)"
 ```
 
-### Phase 3: UI Assembly
+### Phase 10: UI Assembly
 ```bash
-command = "/workflow:ui-design:generate --base-path \"{base_path}\" " +
-          "--style-variants {style_variants} --layout-variants {layout_variants}"
+command = "/workflow:ui-design:generate --design-id \"{design_id}\"" + (--session ? " --session {session_id}" : "")
 
 total = style_variants × layout_variants × len(inferred_target_list)
 
-REPORT: "🚀 Phase 3: UI Assembly | Matrix: {s}×{l}×{n} = {total} prototypes"
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 10: UI Assembly | Matrix: {s}×{l}×{n} = {total} prototypes"
 REPORT: "   → Pure assembly: Combining layout templates + design tokens"
 REPORT: "   → Device: {device_type} (from layout templates)"
 REPORT: "   → Assembly tasks: {total} combinations"
 
+# SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES generate's tasks to current workflow
+# Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
 SlashCommand(command)
 
-# SlashCommand blocks until phase complete
-# Upon completion, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 4 (auto-continue)
+# After executing all attached tasks, collapse them into phase summary
+# When phase finishes, IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 11 (auto-continue)
 # Output:
 # - {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html (assembled prototypes)
 # - {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.css
-# - compare.html (interactive matrix view)
-# - PREVIEW.md (usage instructions)
+# Note: compare.html and PREVIEW.md will be generated in Phase 11
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: Design System Integration
+### Phase 11: Generate Preview Files
 ```bash
-command = "/workflow:ui-design:update" + (--session ? " --session {session_id}" : "")
-SlashCommand(command)
+REPORT: "🚀 Phase 11: Generate Preview Files"
 
-# SlashCommand blocks until phase complete
-# Upon completion:
-#   - If --batch-plan flag present: IMMEDIATELY execute Phase 5 (auto-continue)
-#   - If no --batch-plan: Workflow complete, display final report
-```
+# Update TodoWrite to reflect preview generation phase
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute animation extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute layout extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing layout extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute UI assembly", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing UI assembly"},
+  {"content": "Generate preview files", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating preview files"}
+]})
 
-### Phase 5: Batch Task Generation (Optional)
-```bash
-IF --batch-plan:
-    FOR target IN inferred_target_list:
-        task_desc = "Implement {target} {target_type} based on design system"
-        SlashCommand("/workflow:plan --agent \"{task_desc}\"")
+# Execute preview generation script
+Bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "${base_path}/prototypes")
+
+# Verify output files
+IF NOT exists("${base_path}/prototypes/compare.html"):
+    ERROR: "Preview generation failed: compare.html not found"
+    EXIT 1
+
+IF NOT exists("${base_path}/prototypes/PREVIEW.md"):
+    ERROR: "Preview generation failed: PREVIEW.md not found"
+    EXIT 1
+
+# Mark preview generation as complete
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute animation extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute layout extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing layout extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute UI assembly", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing UI assembly"},
+  {"content": "Generate preview files", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating preview files"}
+]})
+
+REPORT: "✅ Preview files generated successfully"
+REPORT: "   → compare.html (interactive matrix view)"
+REPORT: "   → PREVIEW.md (usage instructions)"
+
+# Workflow complete, display final report
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 ```javascript
-// Initialize IMMEDIATELY after Phase 0c user confirmation to track multi-phase execution
+// Initialize IMMEDIATELY after Phase 5 user confirmation to track multi-phase execution (5 orchestrator-level tasks)
 TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
-  {"content": "Execute style consolidation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
-  {"content": "Execute layout extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
-  {"content": "Execute UI assembly", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."},
-  {"content": "Execute design integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing..."}
+  {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute animation extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute layout extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing layout extraction"},
+  {"content": "Execute UI assembly", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI assembly"},
+  {"content": "Generate preview files", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating preview files"}
 ]})
 
-// ⚠️ CRITICAL: After EACH SlashCommand completion (Phase 1-5), you MUST:
-// 1. SlashCommand blocks and returns when phase is complete
-// 2. Update current phase: status → "completed"
-// 3. Update next phase: status → "in_progress"
-// 4. IMMEDIATELY execute next phase SlashCommand (auto-continue)
-// This ensures continuous workflow tracking and prevents premature stopping
-```
-
-## Key Features
-
-- **🚀 Performance**: Style-centric batch generation with S agent calls
-- **🎨 Style-Aware**: HTML structure adapts to design_attributes
-- **✅ Perfect Consistency**: Each style by single agent
-- **📦 Autonomous**: No user intervention required between phases
-- **🧠 Intelligent**: Parses natural language, infers targets/types
-- **🔄 Reproducible**: Deterministic flow with isolated run directories
-- **🎯 Flexible**: Supports pages, components, or mixed targets
-
-## Examples
-
-### 1. Page Mode (Prompt Inference)
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Modern blog: home, article, author"
-# Result: 27 prototypes (3×3×3) - responsive layouts (default)
-```
-
-### 2. Mobile-First Design
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Mobile shopping app: home, product, cart" --device-type mobile
-# Result: 27 prototypes (3×3×3) - mobile layouts (375×812px)
-```
-
-### 3. Desktop Application
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "dashboard,analytics,settings" --device-type desktop --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 2
-# Result: 12 prototypes (2×2×3) - desktop layouts (1920×1080px)
-```
-
-### 4. Tablet Interface
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Educational app for tablets" --device-type tablet --targets "courses,lessons,profile"
-# Result: 27 prototypes (3×3×3) - tablet layouts (768×1024px)
-```
-
-### 5. Custom Matrix with Session
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --session WFS-ecommerce --images "refs/*.png" --style-variants 2 --layout-variants 2
-# Result: 2×2×N prototypes - device type inferred from session
-```
-
-### 6. Component Mode (Desktop)
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "navbar,hero" --target-type "component" --device-type desktop --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 2
-# Result: 12 prototypes (3×2×2) - desktop components
-```
-
-### 7. Intelligent Parsing + Batch Planning
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --prompt "Create 4 styles with 2 layouts for mobile dashboard and settings" --batch-plan
-# Result: 16 prototypes (4×2×2) + auto-generated tasks - mobile-optimized (inferred from prompt)
-```
-
-### 8. Large Scale Responsive
-```bash
-/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto --targets "home,dashboard,settings,profile" --device-type responsive --style-variants 3 --layout-variants 3
-# Result: 36 prototypes (3×3×4) - responsive layouts
+// ⚠️ CRITICAL: Dynamic TodoWrite task attachment strategy:
+//
+// **Key Concept**: SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES tasks to current workflow.
+// Orchestrator EXECUTES these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
+//
+// Phase 7-10 SlashCommand Invocation Pattern:
+// 1. SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES sub-command tasks to TodoWrite
+// 2. TodoWrite expands to include attached tasks
+// 3. Orchestrator EXECUTES attached tasks sequentially
+// 4. After all attached tasks complete, COLLAPSE them into phase summary
+// 5. Update next phase to in_progress
+// 6. IMMEDIATELY execute next phase (auto-continue)
+//
+// Phase 11 Script Execution Pattern:
+// 1. Mark "Generate preview files" as in_progress
+// 2. Execute preview generation script via Bash tool
+// 3. Verify output files (compare.html, PREVIEW.md)
+// 4. Mark "Generate preview files" as completed
+//
+// Benefits:
+// ✓ Real-time visibility into sub-command task progress
+// ✓ Clean orchestrator-level summary after each phase
+// ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
+// ✓ Script execution for preview generation (no delegation)
+// ✓ Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
 ```
 
 ## Completion Output
@@ -442,35 +674,39 @@ Architecture: Style-Centric Batch Generation
 Run ID: {run_id} | Session: {session_id or "standalone"}
 Type: {icon} {target_type} | Device: {device_type} | Matrix: {s}×{l}×{n} = {total} prototypes
 
-Phase 1: {s} style variants with design_attributes (style-extract)
-Phase 2: {s} design systems with tokens.css (consolidate)
-Phase 2.5: {n×l} layout templates (layout-extract explore mode)
+Phase 7: {s} complete design systems (style-extract with multi-select)
+Phase 9: {n×l} layout templates (layout-extract with multi-select)
   - Device: {device_type} layouts
   - {n} targets × {l} layout variants = {n×l} structural templates
-Phase 3: UI Assembly (generate)
+  - User-selected concepts generated in parallel
+Phase 10: UI Assembly (generate)
   - Pure assembly: layout templates + design tokens
   - {s}×{l}×{n} = {total} final prototypes
-Phase 4: Brainstorming artifacts updated
-[Phase 5: {n} implementation tasks created]  # if --batch-plan
+Phase 11: Preview files generated (compare.html, PREVIEW.md)
 
 Assembly Process:
 ✅ Separation of Concerns: Layout (structure) + Style (tokens) kept separate
 ✅ Layout Extraction: {n×l} reusable structural templates
+✅ Multi-Selection Workflow: User selects multiple variants from generated options
 ✅ Pure Assembly: No design decisions in generate phase
 ✅ Device-Optimized: Layouts designed for {device_type}
 
 Design Quality:
 ✅ Token-Driven Styling: 100% var() usage
-✅ Structural Variety: {l} distinct layouts per target
-✅ Style Variety: {s} independent design systems
+✅ Structural Variety: {l} distinct layouts per target (user-selected)
+✅ Style Variety: {s} independent design systems (user-selected)
 ✅ Device-Optimized: Layouts designed for {device_type}
 
 📂 {base_path}/
-  ├── style-extraction/       ({s} style cards + design-space-analysis.json)
-  ├── style-consolidation/    ({s} design systems with tokens.css)
-  ├── layout-extraction/      ({n×l} layout templates + layout-space-analysis.json)
-  ├── prototypes/             ({total} assembled prototypes)
-  └── .run-metadata.json      (includes device type)
+  ├── .intermediates/          (Intermediate analysis files)
+  │   ├── style-analysis/      (analysis-options.json with embedded user_selection, computed-styles.json if URL mode)
+  │   ├── animation-analysis/  (analysis-options.json with embedded user_selection, animations-*.json if URL mode)
+  │   └── layout-analysis/     (analysis-options.json with embedded user_selection, dom-structure-*.json if URL mode)
+  ├── style-extraction/        ({s} complete design systems)
+  ├── animation-extraction/    (animation-tokens.json, animation-guide.md)
+  ├── layout-extraction/       ({n×l} layout template files: layout-{target}-{variant}.json)
+  ├── prototypes/              ({total} assembled prototypes)
+  └── .run-metadata.json       (includes device type)
 
 🌐 Preview: {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html
   - Interactive {s}×{l} matrix view
@@ -484,6 +720,6 @@ Design Quality:
   - Layout plans stored as structured JSON
   - Optimized for {device_type} viewing
 
-Next: [/workflow:execute] OR [Open compare.html → Select → /workflow:plan]
+Next: Open compare.html to preview all design variants
 ```
 

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/generate.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: generate
-description: Assemble UI prototypes by combining layout templates with design tokens (pure assembler)
-argument-hint: [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--style-variants <count>] [--layout-variants <count>]
+description: Assemble UI prototypes by combining layout templates with design tokens (default animation support), pure assembler without new content generation
+argument-hint: [--design-id <id>] [--session <id>]
 allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -11,38 +11,62 @@ allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(ui-design-agent), Bash(*)
 Pure assembler that combines pre-extracted layout templates with design tokens to generate UI prototypes (`style × layout × targets`). No layout design logic - purely combines existing components.
 
 **Strategy**: Pure Assembly
-- **Input**: `layout-templates.json` + `design-tokens.json` (+ reference images if available)
+- **Input**: `layout-*.json` files + `design-tokens.json` (+ reference images if available)
 - **Process**: Combine structure (DOM) with style (tokens)
 - **Output**: Complete HTML/CSS prototypes
 - **No Design Logic**: All layout and style decisions already made
 - **Automatic Image Reference**: If source images exist in layout templates, they're automatically used for visual context
 
 **Prerequisite Commands**:
-- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → Style tokens
-- `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` → Final design tokens
+- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → Complete design systems (design-tokens.json + style-guide.md)
 - `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → Layout structure
 
 ## Phase 1: Setup & Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Resolve Base Path & Parse Configuration
 ```bash
-# Determine working directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
+# Determine base path with priority: --design-id > --session > auto-detect
+if [ -n "$DESIGN_ID" ]; then
+  # Exact match by design ID
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "${DESIGN_ID}" -type d -print -quit)
+elif [ -n "$SESSION_ID" ]; then
+  # Latest in session
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow/WFS-$SESSION_ID -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+else
+  # Latest globally
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+fi
+
+# Validate and convert to absolute path
+if [ -z "$relative_path" ] || [ ! -d "$relative_path" ]; then
+  echo "❌ ERROR: Design run not found"
+  echo "💡 HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:list' to see available design runs"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+base_path=$(cd "$relative_path" && pwd)
+bash(echo "✓ Base path: $base_path")
 
 # Get style count
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
+bash(ls "$base_path"/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 
 # Image reference auto-detected from layout template source_image_path
 ```
 
 ### Step 2: Load Layout Templates
 ```bash
-# Check layout templates exist
-bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
+# Check layout templates exist (multi-file pattern)
+bash(find {base_path}/layout-extraction -name "layout-*.json" -print -quit | grep -q . && echo "exists")
 
-# Load layout templates
-Read({base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
-# Extract: targets, layout_variants count, device_type, template structures
+# Get list of all layout files
+bash(ls {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-*.json 2>/dev/null)
+
+# Load each layout template file
+FOR each layout_file in layout_files:
+    template_data = Read(layout_file)
+    # Extract: target, variant_id, device_type, dom_structure, css_layout_rules
+
+# Aggregate: targets[], layout_variants count, device_type, all template structures
 ```
 
 **Output**: `base_path`, `style_variants`, `layout_templates[]`, `targets[]`, `device_type`
@@ -50,44 +74,138 @@ Read({base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
 ### Step 3: Validate Design Tokens
 ```bash
 # Check design tokens exist for all styles
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
 
 # For each style variant: Load design tokens
-Read({base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{id}/design-tokens.json)
+Read({base_path}/style-extraction/style-{id}/design-tokens.json)
 ```
 
 **Output**: `design_tokens[]` for all style variants
 
-## Phase 2: Assembly (Agent)
-
-**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` × `T × S × L` tasks (can be batched)
-
-### Step 1: Launch Assembly Tasks
+### Step 4: Load Animation Tokens (Optional)
 ```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes)
+# Check if animation tokens exist
+bash(test -f {base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json && echo "exists")
+
+# Load animation tokens if available
+IF exists({base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json):
+    animation_tokens = Read({base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json)
+    has_animations = true
+ELSE:
+    has_animations = false
 ```
 
-For each `target × style_id × layout_id`:
+**Output**: `animation_tokens` (optional), `has_animations` flag
+
+## Phase 2: Assembly (Agent)
+
+**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` grouped by `target × style` (max 10 layouts per agent, max 6 concurrent agents)
+
+**⚠️ Core Principle**: **Each agent processes ONLY ONE style** (but can process multiple layouts for that style)
+
+### Agent Grouping Strategy
+
+**Grouping Rules**:
+1. **Style Isolation**: Each agent processes ONLY ONE style (never mixed)
+2. **Balanced Distribution**: Layouts evenly split (e.g., 12→6+6, not 10+2)
+3. **Target Separation**: Different targets use different agents
+
+**Distribution Formula**:
+```
+agents_needed = ceil(layout_count / MAX_LAYOUTS_PER_AGENT)
+base_count = floor(layout_count / agents_needed)
+remainder = layout_count % agents_needed
+# First 'remainder' agents get (base_count + 1), others get base_count
+```
+
+**Examples** (MAX=10):
+
+| Scenario | Result | Explanation |
+|----------|--------|-------------|
+| 3 styles × 3 layouts | 3 agents | Each style: 1 agent (3 layouts) |
+| 3 styles × 12 layouts | 6 agents | Each style: 2 agents (6+6 layouts) |
+| 2 styles × 5 layouts × 2 targets | 4 agents | Each (target, style): 1 agent (5 layouts) |
+
+### Step 1: Calculate Agent Grouping Plan
+```bash
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes)
+
+MAX_LAYOUTS_PER_AGENT = 10
+MAX_PARALLEL = 6
+
+agent_groups = []
+FOR each target in targets:
+  FOR each style_id in [1..S]:
+    layouts_for_this_target_style = filter layouts by current target
+    layout_count = len(layouts_for_this_target_style)
+
+    # Balanced distribution (e.g., 12 layouts → 6+6)
+    agents_needed = ceil(layout_count / MAX_LAYOUTS_PER_AGENT)
+    base_count = floor(layout_count / agents_needed)
+    remainder = layout_count % agents_needed
+
+    layout_chunks = []
+    start_idx = 0
+    FOR i in range(agents_needed):
+      chunk_size = base_count + 1 if i < remainder else base_count
+      layout_chunks.append(layouts[start_idx : start_idx + chunk_size])
+      start_idx += chunk_size
+
+    FOR each chunk in layout_chunks:
+      agent_groups.append({
+        target: target,           # Single target
+        style_id: style_id,       # Single style
+        layout_ids: chunk         # Balanced layouts (≤10)
+      })
+
+total_agents = len(agent_groups)
+total_batches = ceil(total_agents / MAX_PARALLEL)
+
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {content: "Setup and validation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading design systems"},
+  {content: "Batch 1/{total_batches}: Assemble up to 6 agent groups", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Assembling batch 1"},
+  {content: "Batch 2/{total_batches}: Assemble up to 6 agent groups", status: "pending", activeForm: "Assembling batch 2"},
+  ... (continue for all batches)
+]})
+```
+
+### Step 2: Launch Batched Assembly Tasks
+
+For each batch (up to 6 parallel agents per batch):
+For each agent group `{target, style_id, layout_ids[]}` in current batch:
 ```javascript
 Task(ui-design-agent): `
   [LAYOUT_STYLE_ASSEMBLY]
-  🎯 Assembly task: {target} × Style-{style_id} × Layout-{layout_id}
-  Combine: Pre-extracted layout structure + design tokens → Final HTML/CSS
+  🎯 {target} × Style-{style_id} × Layouts-{layout_ids}
+  ⚠️ CONSTRAINT: Use ONLY style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json (never mix styles)
 
-  TARGET: {target} | STYLE: {style_id} | LAYOUT: {layout_id}
+  TARGET: {target} | STYLE: {style_id} | LAYOUTS: {layout_ids} (max 10)
   BASE_PATH: {base_path}
 
   ## Inputs (READ ONLY - NO DESIGN DECISIONS)
-  1. Layout Template:
-     Read("{base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json")
-     Find template where: target={target} AND variant_id="layout-{layout_id}"
-     Extract: dom_structure, css_layout_rules, device_type, source_image_path
+  1. Layout Templates (LOOP THROUGH):
+     FOR each layout_id in layout_ids:
+       Read("{base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-{target}-{layout_id}.json")
+       This file contains the specific layout template for this target and variant.
+       Extract: dom_structure, css_layout_rules, device_type, source_image_path (from template field)
 
-  2. Design Tokens:
-     Read("{base_path}/style-consolidation/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
-     Extract: ALL token values (colors, typography, spacing, borders, shadows, breakpoints)
+  2. Design Tokens (SHARED - READ ONCE):
+     Read("{base_path}/style-extraction/style-{style_id}/design-tokens.json")
+     Extract: ALL token values including:
+       * colors, typography (with combinations), spacing, opacity
+       * border_radius, shadows, breakpoints
+       * component_styles (button, card, input variants)
+     Note: typography.combinations, opacity, and component_styles fields contain preset configurations using var() references
 
-  3. Reference Image (AUTO-DETECTED):
+  3. Animation Tokens (OPTIONAL):
+     IF exists("{base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json"):
+       Read("{base_path}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json")
+       Extract: duration, easing, transitions, keyframes, interactions
+       has_animations = true
+     ELSE:
+       has_animations = false
+
+  4. Reference Image (AUTO-DETECTED):
      IF template.source_image_path exists:
        Read(template.source_image_path)
        Purpose: Additional visual context for better placeholder content generation
@@ -95,43 +213,70 @@ Task(ui-design-agent): `
      ELSE:
        Use generic placeholder content
 
-  ## Assembly Process
-  1. Build HTML: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html
-     - Recursively build from template.dom_structure
-     - Add: <!DOCTYPE html>, <head>, <meta viewport>
-     - CSS link: <link href="{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.css">
-     - Inject placeholder content:
-       * Default: Use Lorem ipsum, generic sample data
-       * If reference image available: Generate more contextually appropriate placeholders
-         (e.g., realistic headings, meaningful text snippets that match the visual context)
-     - Preserve all attributes from dom_structure
+  ## Assembly Process (LOOP FOR EACH LAYOUT)
+  FOR each layout_id in layout_ids:
 
-  2. Build CSS: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.css
-     - Start with template.css_layout_rules
-     - Replace ALL var(--*) with actual token values from design-tokens.json
-       Example: var(--spacing-4) → 1rem (from tokens.spacing.4)
-       Example: var(--breakpoint-md) → 768px (from tokens.breakpoints.md)
-     - Add visual styling using design tokens:
-       * Colors: tokens.colors.*
-       * Typography: tokens.typography.*
-       * Shadows: tokens.shadows.*
-       * Border radius: tokens.border_radius.*
-     - Device-optimized for template.device_type
+    1. Build HTML: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html
+       - Recursively build from template.dom_structure
+       - Add: <!DOCTYPE html>, <head>, <meta viewport>
+       - CSS link: <link href="{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.css">
+       - Inject placeholder content:
+         * Default: Use Lorem ipsum, generic sample data
+         * If reference image available: Generate more contextually appropriate placeholders
+           (e.g., realistic headings, meaningful text snippets that match the visual context)
+       - Preserve all attributes from dom_structure
+
+    2. Build CSS: {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.css
+       - Start with template.css_layout_rules
+       - Replace ALL var(--*) with actual token values from design-tokens.json
+         Example: var(--spacing-4) → 1rem (from tokens.spacing.4)
+         Example: var(--breakpoint-md) → 768px (from tokens.breakpoints.md)
+         Example: var(--opacity-80) → 0.8 (from tokens.opacity.80)
+       - Add visual styling using design tokens:
+         * Colors: tokens.colors.*
+         * Typography: tokens.typography.* (including combinations)
+         * Opacity: tokens.opacity.*
+         * Shadows: tokens.shadows.*
+         * Border radius: tokens.border_radius.*
+       - IF tokens.component_styles exists: Add component style classes
+         * Generate classes for button variants (.btn-primary, .btn-secondary)
+         * Generate classes for card variants (.card-default, .card-interactive)
+         * Generate classes for input variants (.input-default, .input-focus, .input-error)
+         * Use var() references that resolve to actual token values
+       - IF tokens.typography.combinations exists: Add typography preset classes
+         * Generate classes for typography presets (.text-heading-primary, .text-body-regular, .text-caption)
+         * Use var() references for family, size, weight, line-height, letter-spacing
+       - IF has_animations == true: Inject animation tokens (ONCE, shared across layouts)
+         * Add CSS Custom Properties for animations at :root level:
+           --duration-instant, --duration-fast, --duration-normal, etc.
+           --easing-linear, --easing-ease-out, etc.
+         * Add @keyframes rules from animation_tokens.keyframes
+         * Add interaction classes (.button-hover, .card-hover) from animation_tokens.interactions
+         * Add utility classes (.transition-color, .transition-transform) from animation_tokens.transitions
+         * Include prefers-reduced-motion media query for accessibility
+       - Device-optimized for template.device_type
+
+    3. Write files IMMEDIATELY after each layout completes
 
   ## Assembly Rules
-  - ✅ Pure assembly: Combine existing structure + existing style
-  - ❌ NO layout design decisions (structure pre-defined)
-  - ❌ NO style design decisions (tokens pre-defined)
+  - ✅ Pure assembly: Combine pre-extracted structure + tokens
+  - ❌ NO design decisions (layout/style pre-defined)
+  - ✅ Read tokens ONCE, apply to all layouts in this batch
   - ✅ Replace var() with actual values
-  - ✅ Add placeholder content only
-  - Write files IMMEDIATELY
-  - CSS filename MUST match HTML <link href="...">
+  - ✅ CSS filename MUST match HTML <link href="...">
+
+  ## Output
+  - Files: {len(layout_ids) × 2} (HTML + CSS pairs)
+  - Each layout generates 2 files independently
 `
+
+# After each batch completes
+TodoWrite: Mark current batch completed, next batch in_progress
 ```
 
-### Step 2: Verify Generated Files
+### Step 3: Verify Generated Files
 ```bash
-# Count expected vs found
+# Count expected vs found (should equal S × L × T)
 bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-*-layout-*.html | wc -l)
 
 # Validate samples
@@ -139,7 +284,7 @@ Read({base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html)
 # Check: <!DOCTYPE html>, correct CSS href, sufficient CSS length
 ```
 
-**Output**: `S × L × T × 2` files verified
+**Output**: `total_files = S × L × T × 2` files verified (HTML + CSS pairs)
 
 ## Phase 3: Generate Preview Files
 
@@ -166,10 +311,10 @@ bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html {base_path}/prototypes/index.html {b
 ```javascript
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Setup and validation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Loading design systems"},
-  {content: "Load layout templates", status: "completed", activeForm: "Reading layout templates"},
-  {content: "Assembly (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Assembling prototypes"},
-  {content: "Verify files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating output"},
-  {content: "Generate previews", status: "completed", activeForm: "Creating preview files"}
+  {content: "Batch 1/{total_batches}: Assemble 6 tasks", status: "completed", activeForm: "Assembling batch 1"},
+  {content: "Batch 2/{total_batches}: Assemble 6 tasks", status: "completed", activeForm: "Assembling batch 2"},
+  ... (all batches completed)
+  {content: "Verify files & generate previews", status: "completed", activeForm: "Creating previews"}
 ]});
 ```
 
@@ -179,33 +324,41 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 
 Configuration:
 - Style Variants: {style_variants}
-- Layout Variants: {layout_variants} (from layout-templates.json)
+- Layout Variants: {layout_variants} (from layout-*.json files)
 - Device Type: {device_type}
 - Targets: {targets}
 - Total Prototypes: {S × L × T}
 - Image Reference: Auto-detected (uses source images when available in layout templates)
+- Animation Support: {has_animations ? 'Enabled (animation-tokens.json loaded)' : 'Not available'}
 
 Assembly Process:
 - Pure assembly: Combined pre-extracted layouts + design tokens
-- No design decisions: All structure and style pre-defined
-- Assembly tasks: T×S×L = {T}×{S}×{L} = {T×S×L} combinations
+- Agent grouping: target × style (max 10 layouts per agent)
+- Balanced distribution: Layouts evenly split (e.g., 12 → 6+6, not 10+2)
+
+Batch Execution:
+- Total agents: {total_agents} (each processes ONE style only)
+- Batches: {total_batches} (max 6 agents parallel)
+- Token efficiency: Read once per agent, apply to all layouts
 
 Quality:
 - Structure: From layout-extract (DOM, CSS layout rules)
-- Style: From consolidate (design tokens)
+- Style: From style-extract (design tokens)
 - CSS: Token values directly applied (var() replaced)
 - Device-optimized: Layouts match device_type from templates
+- Animations: {has_animations ? 'CSS custom properties and @keyframes injected' : 'Static styles only'}
 
 Generated Files:
 {base_path}/prototypes/
-├── _templates/
-│   └── layout-templates.json (input, pre-extracted)
 ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html ({S×L×T} prototypes)
 ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.css
 ├── compare.html (interactive matrix)
 ├── index.html (navigation)
 └── PREVIEW.md (instructions)
 
+Input Files (from layout-extraction/):
+├── layout-{target}-{variant}.json (multiple files, one per target-variant combination)
+
 Preview:
 1. Open compare.html (recommended)
 2. Open index.html
@@ -219,19 +372,22 @@ Next: /workflow:ui-design:update
 ### Path Operations
 ```bash
 # Find design directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
+bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-run-*" | head -1)
 
 # Count style variants
-bash(ls {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-* -d | wc -l)
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 ```
 
 ### Validation Commands
 ```bash
-# Check layout templates exist
-bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
+# Check layout templates exist (multi-file pattern)
+bash(find {base_path}/layout-extraction -name "layout-*.json" -print -quit | grep -q . && echo "exists")
+
+# Count layout files
+bash(ls {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-*.json 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
 
 # Check design tokens exist
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-consolidation/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "valid")
 
 # Count generated files
 bash(ls {base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-*-layout-*.html | wc -l)
@@ -254,10 +410,10 @@ bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
 ```
 {base_path}/
 ├── layout-extraction/
-│   └── layout-templates.json      # Input (from layout-extract)
-├── style-consolidation/
+│   └── layout-{target}-{variant}.json  # Input (multiple files from layout-extract)
+├── style-extraction/
 │   └── style-{s}/
-│       ├── design-tokens.json     # Input (from consolidate)
+│       ├── design-tokens.json          # Input (from style-extract)
 │       └── style-guide.md
 └── prototypes/
     ├── {target}-style-{s}-layout-{l}.html  # Assembled prototypes
@@ -275,7 +431,7 @@ ERROR: Layout templates not found
 → Run /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract first
 
 ERROR: Design tokens not found
-→ Run /workflow:ui-design:consolidate first
+→ Run /workflow:ui-design:style-extract first
 
 ERROR: Agent assembly failed
 → Check inputs exist, validate JSON structure
@@ -286,7 +442,7 @@ ERROR: Script permission denied
 
 ### Recovery Strategies
 - **Partial success**: Keep successful assembly combinations
-- **Invalid template structure**: Validate layout-templates.json
+- **Invalid template structure**: Validate layout-*.json files
 - **Invalid tokens**: Validate design-tokens.json structure
 
 ## Quality Checklist
@@ -302,19 +458,17 @@ ERROR: Script permission denied
 ## Key Features
 
 - **Pure Assembly**: No design decisions, only combination
-- **Separation of Concerns**: Layout (structure) + Style (tokens) kept separate until final assembly
-- **Token Resolution**: var() placeholders replaced with actual values
-- **Pre-validated**: Inputs already validated by extract/consolidate
-- **Efficient**: Simple assembly vs complex generation
+- **Token Resolution**: var() → actual values
+- **Efficient Grouping**: target × style (max 10 layouts/agent, balanced split)
+- **Style Isolation**: Each agent processes ONE style only
 - **Production-Ready**: Semantic, accessible, token-driven
 
 ## Integration
 
 **Prerequisites**:
-- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `style-cards.json`
-- `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` → `design-tokens.json`
-- `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → `layout-templates.json`
+- `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `design-tokens.json` + `style-guide.md`
+- `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → `layout-{target}-{variant}.json` files
 
-**Input**: `layout-templates.json` + `design-tokens.json`
+**Input**: `layout-*.json` files + `design-tokens.json`
 **Output**: S×L×T prototypes for `/workflow:ui-design:update`
 **Called by**: `/workflow:ui-design:explore-auto`, `/workflow:ui-design:imitate-auto`

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/import-from-code.md

@@ -0,0 +1,518 @@
+---
+name: workflow:ui-design:import-from-code
+description: Import design system from code files (CSS/JS/HTML/SCSS) with automatic file discovery and parallel agent analysis
+argument-hint: "[--design-id <id>] [--session <id>] [--source <path>]"
+allowed-tools: Read,Write,Bash,Glob,Grep,Task,TodoWrite
+auto-continue: true
+---
+
+# UI Design: Import from Code
+
+## Overview
+
+Extract design system tokens from source code files (CSS/SCSS/JS/TS/HTML) using parallel agent analysis. Each agent can reference any file type for cross-source token extraction, and directly generates completeness reports with findings and gaps.
+
+**Key Characteristics**:
+- Executes parallel agent analysis (3 agents: Style, Animation, Layout)
+- Each agent can read ALL file types (CSS/SCSS/JS/TS/HTML) for cross-reference
+- Direct completeness reporting without synthesis phase
+- Graceful failure handling with detailed missing content analysis
+- Returns concrete analysis results with recommendations
+
+## Core Functionality
+
+- **File Discovery**: Auto-discover or target specific CSS/SCSS/JS/HTML files
+- **Parallel Analysis**: 3 agents extract tokens simultaneously with cross-file-type support
+- **Completeness Reporting**: Each agent reports found tokens, missing content, and recommendations
+- **Cross-Source Extraction**: Agents can reference any file type (e.g., Style agent can read JS theme configs)
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code [FLAGS]
+
+# Flags
+--design-id <id>        Design run ID to import into (must exist)
+--session <id>          Session ID (uses latest design run in session)
+--source <path>         Source code directory to analyze (required)
+```
+
+**Note**: All file discovery is automatic. The command will scan the source directory and find all relevant style files (CSS, SCSS, JS, HTML) automatically.
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Step 1: Setup & File Discovery
+
+**Purpose**: Initialize session, discover and categorize code files
+
+**Operations**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Determine base path with priority: --design-id > --session > error
+if [ -n "$DESIGN_ID" ]; then
+  # Exact match by design ID
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "${DESIGN_ID}" -type d -print -quit)
+  if [ -z "$relative_path" ]; then
+    echo "ERROR: Design run not found: $DESIGN_ID"
+    echo "HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:list' to see available design runs"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+elif [ -n "$SESSION_ID" ]; then
+  # Latest in session
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow/WFS-$SESSION_ID -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+  if [ -z "$relative_path" ]; then
+    echo "ERROR: No design run found in session: $SESSION_ID"
+    echo "HINT: Create a design run first or provide --design-id"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+else
+  echo "ERROR: Must provide --design-id or --session parameter"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+base_path=$(cd "$relative_path" && pwd)
+design_id=$(basename "$base_path")
+
+# 2. Initialize directories
+source="${source:-.}"
+intermediates_dir="${base_path}/.intermediates/import-analysis"
+mkdir -p "$intermediates_dir"
+
+echo "[Phase 0] File Discovery Started"
+echo "  Design ID: $design_id"
+echo "  Source: $source"
+echo "  Output: $base_path"
+
+# 3. Discover files using script
+discovery_file="${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json"
+~/.claude/scripts/discover-design-files.sh "$source" "$discovery_file"
+
+echo "  Output: $discovery_file"
+```
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Initialize todo list -->
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: 发现和分类代码文件", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "发现代码文件"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.1: Style Agent - 提取视觉token及代码片段 (design-tokens.json + code_snippets)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "提取视觉token"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.2: Animation Agent - 提取动画token及代码片段 (animation-tokens.json + code_snippets)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "提取动画token"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1.3: Layout Agent - 提取布局模式及代码片段 (layout-templates.json + code_snippets)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "提取布局模式"}
+]
+```
+
+**File Discovery Behavior**:
+
+- **Automatic discovery**: Intelligently scans source directory for all style-related files
+- **Supported file types**: CSS, SCSS, JavaScript, TypeScript, HTML
+- **Smart filtering**: Finds theme-related JS/TS files (e.g., tailwind.config.js, theme.js, styled-components)
+- **Exclusions**: Automatically excludes `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `.git/`, and build directories
+- **Output**: Single JSON file `discovered-files.json` in `.intermediates/import-analysis/`
+  - Structure: `{ "css": [...], "js": [...], "html": [...], "counts": {...}, "discovery_time": "..." }`
+  - Generated via bash commands using `find` + JSON formatting
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Update Phase 0 → completed, Phase 1.1-1.3 → in_progress (all 3 agents in parallel) -->
+
+---
+
+### Step 2: Parallel Agent Analysis
+
+**Purpose**: Three agents analyze all file types in parallel, each producing completeness-report.json
+
+**Operations**:
+- **Style Agent**: Extracts visual tokens (colors, typography, spacing) from ALL files (CSS/SCSS/JS/HTML)
+- **Animation Agent**: Extracts animations/transitions from ALL files
+- **Layout Agent**: Extracts layout patterns/component structures from ALL files
+
+**Validation**:
+- Each agent can reference any file type (not restricted to single type)
+- Direct output: Each agent generates completeness-report.json with findings + missing content
+- No synthesis needed: Agents produce final output directly
+
+```bash
+echo "[Phase 1] Starting parallel agent analysis (3 agents)"
+```
+
+#### Style Agent Task (design-tokens.json, style-guide.md)
+
+**Agent Task**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
+     prompt="[STYLE_TOKENS_EXTRACTION]
+  Extract visual design tokens from code files using code import extraction pattern.
+
+  MODE: style-extraction | SOURCE: ${source} | BASE_PATH: ${base_path}
+
+  ## Input Files
+
+  **Discovered Files**: ${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json
+  $(cat \"${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E '(count|files)' | head -30)
+
+  ## Code Import Extraction Strategy
+
+  **Step 0: Fast Conflict Detection** (Use Bash/Grep for quick global scan)
+  - Quick scan: \`rg --color=never -n "^\\s*--primary:|^\\s*--secondary:|^\\s*--accent:" --type css ${source}\` to find core color definitions with line numbers
+  - Semantic search: \`rg --color=never -B3 -A1 "^\\s*--primary:" --type css ${source}\` to capture surrounding context and comments
+  - Core token scan: Search for --primary, --secondary, --accent, --background patterns to detect all theme-critical definitions
+  - Pattern: rg → Extract values → Compare → If different → Read full context with comments → Record conflict
+  - Alternative (if many files): Execute CLI analysis for comprehensive report:
+    \`\`\`bash
+    cd ${source} && gemini -p \"
+    PURPOSE: Detect color token conflicts across all CSS/SCSS/JS files
+    TASK: • Scan all files for color definitions • Identify conflicting values • Extract semantic comments
+    MODE: analysis
+    CONTEXT: @**/*.css @**/*.scss @**/*.js @**/*.ts
+    EXPECTED: JSON report listing conflicts with file:line, values, semantic context
+    RULES: Focus on core tokens | Report ALL variants | analysis=READ-ONLY
+    \"
+    \`\`\`
+
+  **Step 1: Load file list**
+  - Read(${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json)
+  - Extract: file_types.css.files, file_types.js.files, file_types.html.files
+
+  **Step 2: Cross-source token extraction**
+  - CSS/SCSS: Colors, typography, spacing, shadows, borders
+  - JavaScript/TypeScript: Theme configs (Tailwind, styled-components, CSS-in-JS)
+  - HTML: Inline styles, usage patterns
+
+  **Step 3: Validation and Conflict Detection**
+  - Report missing tokens WITHOUT inference (mark as "missing" in _metadata.completeness)
+  - Detect and report inconsistent values across files (list ALL variants with file:line sources)
+  - Report missing categories WITHOUT auto-filling (document gaps for manual review)
+  - CRITICAL: Verify core tokens (primary, secondary, accent) against semantic comments in source code
+
+  ## Output Files
+
+  **Target Directory**: ${base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/
+
+  **Files to Generate**:
+  1. **design-tokens.json**
+     - Follow [DESIGN_SYSTEM_GENERATION_TASK] standard token structure
+     - Add \"_metadata.extraction_source\": \"code_import\"
+     - Add \"_metadata.files_analyzed\": {css, js, html file lists}
+     - Add \"_metadata.completeness\": {status, missing_categories, recommendations}
+     - Add \"_metadata.conflicts\": Array of conflicting definitions (MANDATORY if conflicts exist)
+     - Add \"_metadata.code_snippets\": Map of code snippets (see below)
+     - Add \"_metadata.usage_recommendations\": Usage patterns from code (see below)
+     - Include \"source\" field for each token (e.g., \"file.css:23\")
+
+  **Code Snippet Recording**:
+  - For each extracted token, record the actual code snippet in `_metadata.code_snippets`
+  - Structure:
+    ```json
+    \"code_snippets\": {
+      \"file.css:23\": {
+        \"lines\": \"23-27\",
+        \"snippet\": \":root {\\n  --color-primary: oklch(0.5555 0.15 270);\\n  /* Primary brand color */\\n  --color-primary-hover: oklch(0.6 0.15 270);\\n}\",
+        \"context\": \"css-variable\"
+      }
+    }
+    ```
+  - Context types: \"css-variable\" | \"css-class\" | \"js-object\" | \"js-theme-config\" | \"inline-style\"
+  - Record complete code blocks with all dependencies and relevant comments
+  - Typical ranges: Simple declarations (1-5 lines), Utility classes (5-15 lines), Complete configs (15-50 lines)
+  - Preserve original formatting and indentation
+
+  **Conflict Detection and Reporting**:
+  - When the same token is defined differently across multiple files, record in `_metadata.conflicts`
+  - Follow Agent schema for conflicts array structure (see ui-design-agent.md)
+  - Each conflict MUST include: token_name, category, all definitions with context, selected_value, selection_reason
+  - Selection priority:
+    1. Definitions with semantic comments explaining intent (/* Blue theme */, /* Primary brand color */)
+    2. Definitions that align with overall color scheme described in comments
+    3. When in doubt, report ALL variants and flag for manual review in completeness.recommendations
+
+  **Usage Recommendations Generation**:
+  - Analyze code usage patterns to extract `_metadata.usage_recommendations` (see ui-design-agent.md schema)
+  - **Typography recommendations**:
+    * `common_sizes`: Identify most frequent font size usage (e.g., \"body_text\": \"base (1rem)\")
+    * `common_combinations`: Extract heading+body pairings from actual usage (e.g., h1 with p tags)
+  - **Spacing recommendations**:
+    * `size_guide`: Categorize spacing values into tight/normal/loose based on frequency
+    * `common_patterns`: Extract frequent padding/margin combinations from components
+  - Analysis method: Scan code for class/style usage frequency, extract patterns from component implementations
+  - Optional: If insufficient usage data, mark fields as empty arrays/objects with note in completeness.recommendations
+
+  ## Code Import Specific Requirements
+  - ✅ Read discovered-files.json FIRST to get file paths
+  - ✅ Track extraction source for each token (file:line)
+  - ✅ Record complete code snippets in _metadata.code_snippets (complete blocks with dependencies/comments)
+  - ✅ Include completeness assessment in _metadata
+  - ✅ Report inconsistent values with ALL source locations in _metadata.conflicts (DO NOT auto-normalize or choose)
+  - ✅ CRITICAL: Verify core theme tokens (primary, secondary, accent) match source code semantic intent
+  - ✅ When conflicts exist, prefer definitions with semantic comments explaining intent
+  - ❌ NO inference, NO smart filling, NO automatic conflict resolution
+  - ❌ NO external research or web searches (code-only extraction)
+")
+```
+
+#### Animation Agent Task (animation-tokens.json, animation-guide.md)
+
+**Agent Task**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
+     prompt="[ANIMATION_TOKEN_GENERATION_TASK]
+  Extract animation tokens from code files using code import extraction pattern.
+
+  MODE: animation-extraction | SOURCE: ${source} | BASE_PATH: ${base_path}
+
+  ## Input Files
+
+  **Discovered Files**: ${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json
+  $(cat \"${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E '(count|files)' | head -30)
+
+  ## Code Import Extraction Strategy
+
+  **Step 0: Fast Animation Discovery** (Use Bash/Grep for quick pattern detection)
+  - Quick scan: \`rg --color=never -n "@keyframes|animation:|transition:" --type css ${source}\` to find animation definitions with line numbers
+  - Framework detection: \`rg --color=never "framer-motion|gsap|@react-spring|react-spring" --type js --type ts ${source}\` to detect animation frameworks
+  - Pattern categorization: \`rg --color=never -B2 -A5 "@keyframes" --type css ${source}\` to extract keyframe animations with context
+  - Pattern: rg → Identify animation types → Map framework usage → Prioritize extraction targets
+  - Alternative (if complex framework mix): Execute CLI analysis for comprehensive report:
+    \`\`\`bash
+    cd ${source} && gemini -p \"
+    PURPOSE: Detect animation frameworks and patterns
+    TASK: • Identify frameworks • Map animation patterns • Categorize by complexity
+    MODE: analysis
+    CONTEXT: @**/*.css @**/*.scss @**/*.js @**/*.ts
+    EXPECTED: JSON report listing frameworks, animation types, file locations
+    RULES: Focus on framework consistency | Map all animations | analysis=READ-ONLY
+    \"
+    \`\`\`
+
+  **Step 1: Load file list**
+  - Read(${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json)
+  - Extract: file_types.css.files, file_types.js.files, file_types.html.files
+
+  **Step 2: Cross-source animation extraction**
+  - CSS/SCSS: @keyframes, transitions, animation properties
+  - JavaScript/TypeScript: Animation frameworks (Framer Motion, GSAP), CSS-in-JS
+  - HTML: Inline styles, data-animation attributes
+
+  **Step 3: Framework detection & normalization**
+  - Detect animation frameworks used (css-animations | framer-motion | gsap | none)
+  - Normalize into semantic token system
+  - Cross-reference CSS animations with JS configs
+
+  ## Output Files
+
+  **Target Directory**: ${base_path}/animation-extraction/
+
+  **Files to Generate**:
+  1. **animation-tokens.json**
+     - Follow [ANIMATION_TOKEN_GENERATION_TASK] standard structure
+     - Add \"_metadata.framework_detected\"
+     - Add \"_metadata.files_analyzed\"
+     - Add \"_metadata.completeness\"
+     - Add \"_metadata.code_snippets\": Map of code snippets (same format as Style Agent)
+     - Include \"source\" field for each token
+
+  **Code Snippet Recording**:
+  - Record actual animation/transition code in `_metadata.code_snippets`
+  - Context types: \"css-keyframes\" | \"css-transition\" | \"js-animation\" | \"framer-motion\" | \"gsap\"
+  - Record complete blocks: @keyframes animations (10-30 lines), transition configs (5-15 lines), JS animation objects (15-50 lines)
+  - Include all animation steps, timing functions, and related comments
+  - Preserve original formatting and framework-specific syntax
+
+  ## Code Import Specific Requirements
+  - ✅ Read discovered-files.json FIRST to get file paths
+  - ✅ Detect animation framework if present
+  - ✅ Track extraction source for each token (file:line)
+  - ✅ Record complete code snippets in _metadata.code_snippets (complete animation blocks with all steps/timing)
+  - ✅ Normalize framework-specific syntax into standard tokens
+  - ❌ NO external research or web searches (code-only extraction)
+")
+```
+
+#### Layout Agent Task (layout-templates.json, layout-guide.md)
+
+**Agent Task**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
+     prompt="[LAYOUT_TEMPLATE_GENERATION_TASK]
+  Extract layout patterns from code files using code import extraction pattern.
+
+  MODE: layout-extraction | SOURCE: ${source} | BASE_PATH: ${base_path}
+
+  ## Input Files
+
+  **Discovered Files**: ${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json
+  $(cat \"${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E '(count|files)' | head -30)
+
+  ## Code Import Extraction Strategy
+
+  **Step 0: Fast Component Discovery** (Use Bash/Grep for quick component scan)
+  - Layout pattern scan: \`rg --color=never -n "display:\\s*(grid|flex)|grid-template" --type css ${source}\` to find layout systems
+  - Component class scan: \`rg --color=never "class.*=.*\\"[^\"]*\\b(btn|button|card|input|modal|dialog|dropdown)" --type html --type js --type ts ${source}\` to identify UI components
+  - Universal component heuristic: Components appearing in 3+ files = universal, <3 files = specialized
+  - Pattern: rg → Count occurrences → Classify by frequency → Prioritize universal components
+  - Alternative (if large codebase): Execute CLI analysis for comprehensive categorization:
+    \`\`\`bash
+    cd ${source} && gemini -p \"
+    PURPOSE: Classify components as universal vs specialized
+    TASK: • Identify UI components • Classify reusability • Map layout systems
+    MODE: analysis
+    CONTEXT: @**/*.css @**/*.scss @**/*.js @**/*.ts @**/*.html
+    EXPECTED: JSON report categorizing components, layout patterns, naming conventions
+    RULES: Focus on component reusability | Identify layout systems | analysis=READ-ONLY
+    \"
+    \`\`\`
+
+  **Step 1: Load file list**
+  - Read(${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json)
+  - Extract: file_types.css.files, file_types.js.files, file_types.html.files
+
+  **Step 2: Cross-source layout extraction**
+  - CSS/SCSS: Grid systems, flexbox utilities, layout classes, media queries
+  - JavaScript/TypeScript: Layout components (React/Vue), grid configs
+  - HTML: Semantic structure, component hierarchies
+
+  **Component Classification** (MUST annotate in extraction):
+  - **Universal Components**: Reusable multi-component templates (buttons, inputs, cards, modals, etc.)
+  - **Specialized Components**: Module-specific components from code (feature-specific layouts, custom widgets, domain components)
+
+  **Step 3: System identification**
+  - Detect naming convention (BEM | SMACSS | utility-first | css-modules)
+  - Identify layout system (12-column | flexbox | css-grid | custom)
+  - Extract responsive strategy and breakpoints
+
+  ## Output Files
+
+  **Target Directory**: ${base_path}/layout-extraction/
+
+  **Files to Generate**:
+
+  1. **layout-templates.json**
+     - Follow [LAYOUT_TEMPLATE_GENERATION_TASK] standard structure
+     - Add \"extraction_metadata\" section:
+       * extraction_source: \"code_import\"
+       * naming_convention: detected convention
+       * layout_system: {type, confidence, source_files}
+       * responsive: {breakpoints, mobile_first, source}
+       * completeness: {status, missing_items, recommendations}
+       * code_snippets: Map of code snippets (same format as Style Agent)
+     - For each component in \"layout_templates\":
+       * Include \"source\" field (file:line)
+       * **Include \"component_type\" field: \"universal\" | \"specialized\"**
+       * dom_structure with semantic HTML5
+       * css_layout_rules using var() placeholders
+       * Add \"description\" field explaining component purpose and classification rationale
+       * **Add \"usage_guide\" field for universal components** (see ui-design-agent.md schema):
+         - common_sizes: Extract size variants (small/medium/large) from code
+         - variant_recommendations: Document when to use each variant (primary/secondary/etc)
+         - usage_context: List typical usage scenarios from actual implementation
+         - accessibility_tips: Extract ARIA patterns and a11y notes from code
+
+  **Code Snippet Recording**:
+  - Record actual layout/component code in `extraction_metadata.code_snippets`
+  - Context types: \"css-grid\" | \"css-flexbox\" | \"css-utility\" | \"html-structure\" | \"react-component\"
+  - Record complete blocks: Utility classes (5-15 lines), HTML structures (10-30 lines), React components (20-100 lines)
+  - For components: include HTML structure + associated CSS rules + component logic
+  - Preserve original formatting and framework-specific syntax
+
+  ## Code Import Specific Requirements
+  - ✅ Read discovered-files.json FIRST to get file paths
+  - ✅ Detect and document naming conventions
+  - ✅ Identify layout system with confidence level
+  - ✅ Extract component variants and states from usage patterns
+  - ✅ **Classify each component as \"universal\" or \"specialized\"** based on:
+    * Universal: Reusable across multiple features (buttons, inputs, cards, modals)
+    * Specialized: Feature-specific or domain-specific (checkout form, dashboard widget)
+  - ✅ Record complete code snippets in extraction_metadata.code_snippets (complete components/structures)
+  - ✅ **Document classification rationale** in component description
+  - ✅ **Generate usage_guide for universal components** (REQUIRED):
+    * Analyze code to extract size variants (scan for size-related classes/props)
+    * Document variant usage from code comments and implementation patterns
+    * List usage contexts from component instances in codebase
+    * Extract accessibility patterns from ARIA attributes and a11y comments
+    * If insufficient data, populate with minimal valid structure and note in completeness
+  - ❌ NO external research or web searches (code-only extraction)
+")
+```
+
+**Wait for All Agents**:
+
+```bash
+# Note: Agents run in parallel and write separate completeness reports
+# Each agent generates its own completeness-report.json directly
+# No synthesis phase needed
+echo "[Phase 1] Parallel agent analysis complete"
+```
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Update Phase 1.1-1.3 → completed (all 3 agents complete together) -->
+
+---
+
+## Output Files
+
+### Generated Files
+
+**Location**: `${base_path}/`
+
+**Directory Structure**:
+```
+${base_path}/
+├── style-extraction/
+│   └── style-1/
+│       └── design-tokens.json       # Production-ready design tokens with code snippets
+├── animation-extraction/
+│   └── animation-tokens.json        # Animation/transition tokens with code snippets
+├── layout-extraction/
+│   └── layout-templates.json        # Layout patterns with code snippets
+└── .intermediates/
+    └── import-analysis/
+        └── discovered-files.json    # All discovered files (JSON format)
+```
+
+**Files**:
+1. **style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json**
+   - Production-ready design tokens
+   - Categories: colors, typography, spacing, opacity, border_radius, shadows, breakpoints
+   - Metadata: extraction_source, files_analyzed, completeness assessment, **code_snippets**
+   - **Code snippets**: Complete code blocks from source files (CSS variables, theme configs, inline styles)
+
+2. **animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json**
+   - Animation tokens: duration, easing, transitions, keyframes, interactions
+   - Framework detection: css-animations, framer-motion, gsap, etc.
+   - Metadata: extraction_source, completeness assessment, **code_snippets**
+   - **Code snippets**: Complete animation blocks (@keyframes, transition configs, JS animations)
+
+3. **layout-extraction/layout-templates.json**
+   - Layout templates for each discovered component
+   - Extraction metadata: naming_convention, layout_system, responsive strategy, **code_snippets**
+   - Component patterns with DOM structure and CSS rules
+   - **Code snippets**: Complete component/structure code (HTML, CSS utilities, React components)
+
+**Intermediate Files**: `.intermediates/import-analysis/`
+- `discovered-files.json` - All discovered files in JSON format with counts and metadata
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Common Errors
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| No files discovered | Wrong --source path or no style files in directory | Verify --source parameter points to correct directory with style files |
+| Agent reports "failed" status | No tokens found in any file | Review file content, check if files contain design tokens |
+| Empty completeness reports | Files exist but contain no extractable tokens | Manually verify token definitions in source files |
+| Missing file type | File extensions not recognized | Check that files use standard extensions (.css, .scss, .js, .ts, .html) |
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Point to the right directory**: Use `--source` to specify the directory containing your style files (e.g., `./src`, `./app`, `./styles`)
+2. **Let automatic discovery work**: The command will find all relevant files - no need to specify patterns
+3. **Specify target design run**: Use `--design-id` for existing design run or `--session` to use session's latest design run (one of these is required)
+4. **Cross-reference agent reports**: Compare all three completeness reports (style, animation, layout) to identify gaps
+5. **Review missing content**: Check `_metadata.completeness` field in reports for actionable improvements
+6. **Verify file discovery**: Check `${base_path}/.intermediates/import-analysis/discovered-files.json` if agents report no data

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/layout-extract.md

@@ -1,51 +1,104 @@
 ---
 name: layout-extract
-description: Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text prompts
-argument-hint: [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--urls "<list>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--mode <imitate|explore>] [--variants <count>] [--device-type <desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive>]
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), Task(ui-design-agent), mcp__exa__web_search_exa(*)
+description: Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text prompts using Claude analysis with variant generation or refinement mode
+argument-hint: [--design-id <id>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--urls "<list>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--targets "<list>"] [--variants <count>] [--device-type <desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive>] [--interactive] [--refine]
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Task(ui-design-agent), mcp__exa__web_search_exa(*)
 ---
 
 # Layout Extraction Command
 
 ## Overview
-Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text prompts using AI analysis. This command separates the "scaffolding" (HTML structure and CSS layout) from the "paint" (visual tokens handled by `style-extract`).
+
+Extract structural layout information from reference images, URLs, or text prompts using AI analysis. Supports two modes:
+1. **Exploration Mode** (default): Generate multiple contrasting layout variants
+2. **Refinement Mode** (`--refine`): Refine a single existing layout through detailed adjustments
+
+This command separates the "scaffolding" (HTML structure and CSS layout) from the "paint" (visual tokens handled by `style-extract`).
 
 **Strategy**: AI-Driven Structural Analysis
+
 - **Agent-Powered**: Uses `ui-design-agent` for deep structural analysis
-- **Dual-Mode**:
-  - `imitate`: High-fidelity replication of single layout structure
-  - `explore`: Multiple structurally distinct layout variations
-- **Single Output**: `layout-templates.json` with DOM structure, component hierarchy, and CSS layout rules
+- **Dual Mode**: Exploration (multiple contrasting variants) or Refinement (single layout fine-tuning)
+- **Output**: `layout-templates.json` with DOM structure, component hierarchy, and CSS layout rules
 - **Device-Aware**: Optimized for specific device types (desktop, mobile, tablet, responsive)
 - **Token-Based**: CSS uses `var()` placeholders for spacing and breakpoints
 
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Detect Input, Mode & Targets
+
 ```bash
 # Detect input source
 # Priority: --urls + --images → hybrid | --urls → url | --images → image | --prompt → text
 
-# Determine extraction mode
-extraction_mode = --mode OR "imitate"  # "imitate" or "explore"
+# Parse URLs if provided (format: "target:url,target:url,...")
+IF --urls:
+    url_list = []
+    FOR pair IN split(--urls, ","):
+        IF ":" IN pair:
+            target, url = pair.split(":", 1)
+            url_list.append({target: target.strip(), url: url.strip()})
+        ELSE:
+            # Single URL without target
+            url_list.append({target: "page", url: pair.strip()})
 
-# Set variants count based on mode
-IF extraction_mode == "imitate":
-    variants_count = 1  # Force single variant (ignore --variants)
-ELSE IF extraction_mode == "explore":
-    variants_count = --variants OR 3  # Default to 3
+    has_urls = true
+ELSE:
+    has_urls = false
+    url_list = []
+
+# Detect refinement mode
+refine_mode = --refine OR false
+
+# Set variants count
+# Refinement mode: Force variants_count = 1 (ignore user-provided --variants)
+# Exploration mode: Use --variants or default to 3 (range: 1-5)
+IF refine_mode:
+    variants_count = 1
+    REPORT: "🔧 Refinement mode enabled: Will generate 1 refined layout per target"
+ELSE:
+    variants_count = --variants OR 3
     VALIDATE: 1 <= variants_count <= 5
+    REPORT: "🔍 Exploration mode: Will generate {variants_count} contrasting layout concepts per target"
 
 # Resolve targets
-# Priority: --targets → prompt analysis → default ["page"]
-targets = --targets OR extract_from_prompt(--prompt) OR ["page"]
+# Priority: --targets → url_list targets → prompt analysis → default ["page"]
+IF --targets:
+    targets = split(--targets, ",")
+ELSE IF has_urls:
+    targets = [url_info.target for url_info in url_list]
+ELSE IF --prompt:
+    # Extract targets from prompt using pattern matching
+    # Looks for keywords: "page names", target descriptors (login, dashboard, etc.)
+    # Returns lowercase, hyphenated strings (e.g., ["login", "dashboard"])
+    targets = extract_from_prompt(--prompt)
+ELSE:
+    targets = ["page"]
 
 # Resolve device type
 device_type = --device-type OR "responsive"  # desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive
 
-# Determine base path
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
-# OR use --base-path / --session parameters
+# Determine base path with priority: --design-id > --session > auto-detect
+if [ -n "$DESIGN_ID" ]; then
+  # Exact match by design ID
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "${DESIGN_ID}" -type d -print -quit)
+elif [ -n "$SESSION_ID" ]; then
+  # Latest in session
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow/WFS-$SESSION_ID -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+else
+  # Latest globally
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+fi
+
+# Validate and convert to absolute path
+if [ -z "$relative_path" ] || [ ! -d "$relative_path" ]; then
+  echo "❌ ERROR: Design run not found"
+  echo "💡 HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:list' to see available design runs"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+base_path=$(cd "$relative_path" && pwd)
+bash(echo "✓ Base path: $base_path")
 ```
 
 ### Step 2: Load Inputs & Create Directories
@@ -65,117 +118,576 @@ Read({image_path})  # Load each image
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Memory Check (Skip if Already Done)
+### Step 2.5: Extract DOM Structure (URL Mode - Auto-Trigger)
 ```bash
-# Check if layouts already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
+# AUTO-TRIGGER: If URLs are available (from --urls parameter), automatically extract real DOM structure
+# This provides accurate layout data to supplement visual analysis
+
+# Check if URLs provided via --urls parameter
+IF --urls AND url_list:
+    REPORT: "🔍 Auto-triggering URL mode: Extracting DOM structure"
+
+    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis)
+
+    # For each URL in url_list:
+    FOR url_info IN url_list:
+        target = url_info.target
+        url = url_info.url
+
+        IF mcp_chrome_devtools_available:
+            REPORT: "   Processing: {target} ({url})"
+
+            # Read extraction script
+            script_content = Read(~/.claude/scripts/extract-layout-structure.js)
+
+            # Open page in Chrome DevTools
+            mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page(url=url)
+
+            # Execute layout extraction script
+            result = mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script(function=script_content)
+
+            # Save DOM structure for this target (intermediate file)
+            Write({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/dom-structure-{target}.json, result)
+
+            REPORT: "   ✅ DOM structure extracted for '{target}'"
+        ELSE:
+            REPORT: "   ⚠️ Chrome DevTools MCP not available, falling back to visual analysis"
+            BREAK
+
+    dom_structure_available = mcp_chrome_devtools_available
+ELSE:
+    dom_structure_available = false
 ```
 
-**If exists**: Skip to completion message
+**Extraction Script Reference**: `~/.claude/scripts/extract-layout-structure.js`
 
-**Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `targets[]`, `device_type`, loaded inputs
+**Usage**: Read the script file and use content directly in `mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script()`
 
-## Phase 1: Layout Research (Explore Mode Only)
+**Script returns**:
+- `metadata`: Extraction timestamp, URL, method, version
+- `patterns`: Layout pattern statistics (flexColumn, flexRow, grid counts)
+- `structure`: Hierarchical DOM tree with layout properties
+- `exploration`: (Optional) Progressive exploration results when standard selectors fail
 
-### Step 1: Check Extraction Mode
-```bash
-# extraction_mode == "imitate" → skip this phase
-# extraction_mode == "explore" → execute this phase
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Real flex/grid configuration (justifyContent, alignItems, gap, etc.)
+- ✅ Accurate element bounds (x, y, width, height)
+- ✅ Structural hierarchy with depth control
+- ✅ Layout pattern identification (flex-row, flex-column, grid-NCol)
+- ✅ Progressive exploration: Auto-discovers missing selectors
+
+**Progressive Exploration Strategy** (v2.2.0+):
+
+When script finds <3 main containers, it automatically:
+1. **Scans** all large visible containers (≥500×300px)
+2. **Extracts** class patterns matching: `main|content|wrapper|container|page|layout|app`
+3. **Suggests** new selectors to add to script
+4. **Returns** exploration data in `result.exploration`:
+   ```json
+   {
+     "triggered": true,
+     "discoveredCandidates": [{classes, bounds, display}],
+     "suggestedSelectors": [".wrapper", ".page-index"],
+     "recommendation": ".wrapper, .page-index, .app-container"
+   }
+   ```
+
+**Using Exploration Results**:
+```javascript
+// After extraction, check for suggestions
+IF result.exploration?.triggered:
+    REPORT: result.exploration.warning
+    REPORT: "Suggested selectors: " + result.exploration.recommendation
+
+    // Update script by adding to commonClassSelectors array
+    // Then re-run extraction for better coverage
 ```
 
-**If imitate mode**: Skip to Phase 2
+**Selector Update Workflow**:
+1. Run extraction on unfamiliar site
+2. Check `result.exploration.suggestedSelectors`
+3. Add relevant selectors to script's `commonClassSelectors`
+4. Re-run extraction → improved container detection
 
-### Step 2: Gather Layout Inspiration (Explore Mode)
+### Step 3: Memory Check
 ```bash
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations)
+# 1. Check if inputs cached in session memory
+IF session_has_inputs: SKIP Step 2 file reading
 
-# For each target: Research via MCP
-# mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query="{target} layout patterns {device_type}", numResults=5)
-
-# Write inspiration file
-Write({base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, inspiration_content)
+# 2. Check if output already exists
+bash(find {base_path}/layout-extraction -name "layout-*.json" -print -quit | grep -q . && echo "exists")
+IF exists: SKIP to completion
 ```
 
-**Output**: Inspiration text files for each target (explore mode only)
+---
 
-## Phase 2: Layout Analysis & Synthesis (Agent)
+**Phase 0 Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `variants_count`, `targets[]`, `device_type`, loaded inputs
 
+## Phase 1: Layout Concept or Refinement Options Generation
+
+### Step 0.5: Load Existing Layout (Refinement Mode)
+```bash
+IF refine_mode:
+    # Load existing layout for refinement
+    existing_layouts = {}
+    FOR target IN targets:
+        layout_files = bash(find {base_path}/layout-extraction -name "layout-{target}-*.json" -print)
+        IF layout_files:
+            # Use first/latest layout file for this target
+            existing_layouts[target] = Read(first_layout_file)
+```
+
+### Step 1: Generate Options (Agent Task 1 - Mode-Specific)
 **Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)`
 
-### Step 1: Launch Agent Task
+**Exploration Mode** (default): Generate contrasting layout concepts
+**Refinement Mode** (`--refine`): Generate refinement options for existing layouts
+
 ```javascript
-Task(ui-design-agent): `
-  [LAYOUT_EXTRACTION_TASK]
-  Analyze references and extract structural layout templates.
-  Focus ONLY on structure and layout. DO NOT concern with visual style (colors, fonts, etc.).
+// Conditional agent task based on refine_mode
+IF NOT refine_mode:
+    // EXPLORATION MODE
+    Task(ui-design-agent): `
+      [LAYOUT_CONCEPT_GENERATION_TASK]
+      Generate {variants_count} structurally distinct layout concepts for each target
 
-  REFERENCES:
-  - Input: {reference_material}  // Images, URLs, or prompt
-  - Mode: {extraction_mode}  // 'imitate' or 'explore'
-  - Targets: {targets}  // List of page/component names
-  - Variants per Target: {variants_count}
-  - Device Type: {device_type}
-  ${exploration_mode ? "- Layout Inspiration: Read('" + base_path + "/layout-extraction/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt')" : ""}
+      SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: explore | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+      TARGETS: {targets} | DEVICE_TYPE: {device_type}
 
-  ## Analysis & Generation
-  For EACH target in {targets}:
-    For EACH variant (1 to {variants_count}):
-      1. **Analyze Structure**: Deconstruct reference to understand layout, hierarchy, responsiveness
-      2. **Define Philosophy**: Short description (e.g., "Asymmetrical grid with overlapping content areas")
-      3. **Generate DOM Structure**: JSON object representing semantic HTML5 structure
-         - Semantic tags: <header>, <nav>, <main>, <aside>, <section>, <footer>
+      ## Input Analysis
+      - Targets: {targets.join(", ")}
+      - Device type: {device_type}
+      - Visual references: {loaded_images if available}
+      ${dom_structure_available ? "- DOM Structure: Read from .intermediates/layout-analysis/dom-structure-*.json" : ""}
+
+      ## Analysis Rules
+      - For EACH target, generate {variants_count} structurally DIFFERENT layout concepts
+      - Concepts must differ in: grid structure, component arrangement, visual hierarchy
+  - Each concept should have distinct navigation pattern, content flow, and responsive behavior
+
+  ## Generate for EACH Target
+  For target in {targets}:
+    For concept_index in 1..{variants_count}:
+      1. **Concept Definition**:
+         - concept_name (descriptive, e.g., "Classic Three-Column Holy Grail")
+         - design_philosophy (1-2 sentences explaining the structural approach)
+         - layout_pattern (e.g., "grid-3col", "flex-row", "single-column", "asymmetric-grid")
+         - key_components (array of main layout regions)
+         - structural_features (list of distinguishing characteristics)
+
+      2. **Wireframe Preview** (simple text representation):
+         - ascii_art (simple ASCII box diagram showing layout structure)
+         - Example:
+           ┌─────────────────┐
+           │     HEADER      │
+           ├──┬─────────┬────┤
+           │ L│  MAIN   │ R  │
+           └──┴─────────┴────┘
+
+  ## Output
+  Write single JSON file: {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json
+
+  Use schema from INTERACTIVE-DATA-SPEC.md (Layout Extract: analysis-options.json)
+
+  CRITICAL: Use Write() tool immediately after generating complete JSON
+    `
+ELSE:
+    // REFINEMENT MODE
+    Task(ui-design-agent): `
+      [LAYOUT_REFINEMENT_OPTIONS_TASK]
+      Generate refinement options for existing layout(s)
+
+      SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: refine | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+      TARGETS: {targets} | DEVICE_TYPE: {device_type}
+
+      ## Existing Layouts
+      ${FOR target IN targets: "- {target}: {existing_layouts[target]}"}
+
+      ## Input Guidance
+      - User prompt: {prompt_guidance if available}
+      - Visual references: {loaded_images if available}
+
+      ## Refinement Categories
+      Generate 8-12 refinement options per target across these categories:
+
+      1. **Density Adjustments** (2-3 options per target):
+         - More compact: Tighter spacing, reduced whitespace
+         - More spacious: Increased margins, breathing room
+         - Balanced: Moderate adjustments
+
+      2. **Responsiveness Tuning** (2-3 options per target):
+         - Breakpoint behavior: Earlier/later column stacking
+         - Mobile layout: Different navigation/content priority
+         - Tablet optimization: Hybrid desktop/mobile approach
+
+      3. **Grid/Flex Specifics** (2-3 options per target):
+         - Column counts: 2-col ↔ 3-col ↔ 4-col
+         - Gap sizes: Tighter ↔ wider gutters
+         - Alignment: Different flex/grid justification
+
+      4. **Component Arrangement** (1-2 options per target):
+         - Navigation placement: Top ↔ side ↔ bottom
+         - Sidebar position: Left ↔ right ↔ none
+         - Content hierarchy: Different section ordering
+
+      ## Output Format
+      Each option (per target):
+      - target: Which target this refinement applies to
+      - category: "density|responsiveness|grid|arrangement"
+      - option_id: unique identifier
+      - label: Short descriptive name (e.g., "More Compact Spacing")
+      - description: What changes (2-3 sentences)
+      - preview_changes: Key structural adjustments
+      - impact_scope: Which layout regions affected
+
+      ## Output
+      Write single JSON file: {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json
+
+      Use refinement schema:
+      {
+        "mode": "refinement",
+        "device_type": "{device_type}",
+        "refinement_options": {
+          "{target1}": [array of refinement options],
+          "{target2}": [array of refinement options]
+        }
+      }
+
+      CRITICAL: Use Write() tool immediately after generating complete JSON
+    `
+```
+
+### Step 2: Verify Options File Created
+```bash
+bash(test -f {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json && echo "created")
+
+# Quick validation
+bash(cat {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json | grep -q "layout_concepts" && echo "valid")
+```
+
+**Output**: `analysis-options.json` with layout concept options for all targets
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1.5: User Confirmation (Optional - Triggered by --interactive)
+
+**Purpose**:
+- **Exploration Mode**: Allow user to select preferred layout concept(s) per target
+- **Refinement Mode**: Allow user to select refinement options to apply per target
+
+**Trigger Condition**: Execute this phase ONLY if `--interactive` flag is present
+
+### Step 1: Check Interactive Flag
+```bash
+# Skip this entire phase if --interactive flag is not present
+IF NOT --interactive:
+    SKIP to Phase 2
+    IF refine_mode:
+        REPORT: "ℹ️ Non-interactive refinement mode: Will apply all suggested refinements"
+    ELSE:
+        REPORT: "ℹ️ Non-interactive mode: Will generate all {variants_count} variants per target"
+
+# Interactive mode enabled
+REPORT: "🎯 Interactive mode: User selection required for {targets.length} target(s)"
+```
+
+### Step 2: Load and Present Options (Mode-Specific)
+```bash
+# Read options file
+options = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+
+# Branch based on mode
+IF NOT refine_mode:
+    # EXPLORATION MODE
+    layout_concepts = options.layout_concepts
+ELSE:
+    # REFINEMENT MODE
+    refinement_options = options.refinement_options
+```
+
+### Step 2: Present Options to User (Per Target)
+For each target, present layout concept options and capture selection:
+
+```
+📋 Layout Concept Options for Target: {target}
+
+We've generated {variants_count} structurally different layout concepts for review.
+Please select your preferred concept for this target.
+
+{FOR each concept in layout_concepts[target]:
+  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+  Concept {concept.index}: {concept.concept_name}
+  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+
+  Philosophy: {concept.design_philosophy}
+  Pattern: {concept.layout_pattern}
+
+  Components:
+  {FOR each component in concept.key_components:
+    • {component}
+  }
+
+  Features:
+  {FOR each feature in concept.structural_features:
+    • {feature}
+  }
+
+  Wireframe:
+  {concept.wireframe_preview.ascii_art}
+
+  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+}
+```
+
+### Step 3: Capture User Selection and Update Options File (Per Target)
+
+**Interaction Strategy**: If total concepts > 4 OR any target has > 3 concepts, use batch text format:
+
+```
+【目标[N] - [target]】选择布局方案
+[key]) Concept [index]: [concept_name]
+   [design_philosophy]
+[key]) Concept [index]: [concept_name]
+   [design_philosophy]
+...
+请回答 (格式: 1a 2b 或 1a,b 2c 多选)：
+
+User input:
+  "[N][key] [N][key] ..." → Single selection per target
+  "[N][key1,key2] [N][key3] ..." → Multi-selection per target
+```
+
+Otherwise, use `AskUserQuestion` below.
+
+```javascript
+// Use AskUserQuestion tool for each target (multi-select enabled)
+FOR each target:
+  AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: "Which layout concept(s) do you prefer for '{target}'?",
+      header: "Layout for " + target,
+      multiSelect: true,  // Multi-selection enabled (default behavior)
+      options: [
+        {FOR each concept in layout_concepts[target]:
+          label: "Concept {concept.index}: {concept.concept_name}",
+          description: "{concept.design_philosophy}"
+        }
+      ]
+    }]
+  })
+
+  // Parse user response (array of selections)
+  selected_options = user_answer
+
+  // Check for user cancellation
+  IF selected_options == null OR selected_options.length == 0:
+      REPORT: "⚠️ User canceled selection. Workflow terminated."
+      EXIT workflow
+
+  // Extract concept indices from array
+  selected_indices = []
+  FOR each selected_option_text IN selected_options:
+      match = selected_option_text.match(/Concept (\d+):/)
+      IF match:
+          selected_indices.push(parseInt(match[1]))
+      ELSE:
+          ERROR: "Invalid selection format. Expected 'Concept N: ...' format"
+          EXIT workflow
+
+  // Store selections for this target (array of indices)
+  selections[target] = {
+    selected_indices: selected_indices,  // Array of selected indices
+    concept_names: selected_indices.map(i => layout_concepts[target][i-1].concept_name)
+  }
+
+  REPORT: "✅ Selected {selected_indices.length} layout(s) for {target}"
+
+// Calculate total selections across all targets
+total_selections = sum([len(selections[t].selected_indices) for t in targets])
+
+// Update analysis-options.json with user selection (embedded in same file)
+options_file = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+options_file.user_selection = {
+  "selected_at": "{current_timestamp}",
+  "selection_type": "per_target_multi",
+  "session_id": "{session_id}",
+  "total_selections": total_selections,
+  "selected_variants": selections  // {target: {selected_indices: [...], concept_names: [...]}}
+}
+
+// Write updated file back
+Write({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json, JSON.stringify(options_file, indent=2))
+```
+
+### Step 4: Confirmation Message
+```
+✅ Selections recorded! Total: {total_selections} layout(s)
+
+{FOR each target, selection in selections:
+  • {target}: {selection.selected_indices.length} layout(s) selected
+    {FOR each index IN selection.selected_indices:
+      - Concept {index}: {layout_concepts[target][index-1].concept_name}
+    }
+}
+
+Proceeding to generate {total_selections} detailed layout template(s)...
+```
+
+**Output**: `analysis-options.json` updated with embedded `user_selection` field
+
+## Phase 2: Layout Template Generation (Agent Task 2)
+
+**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` × `Total_Selected_Templates` in **parallel**
+
+### Step 1: Load User Selections or Default to All
+```bash
+# Read analysis-options.json which may contain user_selection
+options = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+layout_concepts = options.layout_concepts
+
+# Check if user_selection field exists (interactive mode)
+IF options.user_selection AND options.user_selection.selected_variants:
+    # Interactive mode: Use user-selected variants
+    selections_per_target = options.user_selection.selected_variants
+    total_selections = options.user_selection.total_selections
+ELSE:
+    # Non-interactive mode: Generate ALL variants for ALL targets (default behavior)
+    selections_per_target = {}
+    total_selections = 0
+
+    FOR each target in targets:
+        selections_per_target[target] = {
+            "selected_indices": [1, 2, ..., variants_count],  # All indices
+            "concept_names": []  # Will be filled from options
+        }
+        total_selections += variants_count
+
+# Build task list for all selected concepts across all targets
+task_list = []
+FOR each target in targets:
+    selected_indices = selections_per_target[target].selected_indices  # Array
+    concept_names = selections_per_target[target].concept_names        # Array
+
+    FOR i in range(len(selected_indices)):
+        idx = selected_indices[i]
+        concept = layout_concepts[target][idx - 1]  # 0-indexed array
+        variant_id = i + 1  # 1-based variant numbering
+
+        task_list.push({
+            target: target,
+            variant_id: variant_id,
+            concept: concept,
+            output_file: "{base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-{target}-{variant_id}.json"
+        })
+
+total_tasks = task_list.length
+REPORT: "Generating {total_tasks} layout templates across {targets.length} targets"
+```
+
+### Step 2: Launch Parallel Agent Tasks
+Generate layout templates for ALL selected concepts in parallel:
+```javascript
+FOR each task in task_list:
+    Task(ui-design-agent): `
+      [LAYOUT_TEMPLATE_GENERATION_TASK #{task.variant_id} for {task.target}]
+      Generate detailed layout template based on user-selected concept.
+      Focus ONLY on structure and layout. DO NOT concern with visual style (colors, fonts, etc.).
+
+      SESSION: {session_id} | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+      TARGET: {task.target} | VARIANT: {task.variant_id}
+      DEVICE_TYPE: {device_type}
+
+      USER SELECTION:
+      - Selected Concept: {task.concept.concept_name}
+      - Philosophy: {task.concept.design_philosophy}
+      - Pattern: {task.concept.layout_pattern}
+      - Key Components: {task.concept.key_components.join(", ")}
+      - Structural Features: {task.concept.structural_features.join(", ")}
+
+      ## Input Analysis
+      - Target: {task.target}
+      - Device type: {device_type}
+      - Visual references: {loaded_images if available}
+      ${dom_structure_available ? "- DOM Structure Data: Read from .intermediates/layout-analysis/dom-structure-{task.target}.json - USE THIS for accurate layout properties" : ""}
+
+      ## Generation Rules
+      - Develop the user-selected layout concept into a detailed template
+      - Use the selected concept's key_components as foundation
+      - Apply the selected layout_pattern (grid-3col, flex-row, etc.)
+      - Honor the structural_features defined in the concept
+      - Expand the concept with complete DOM structure and CSS layout rules
+      ${dom_structure_available ? `
+      - IMPORTANT: You have access to real DOM structure data with accurate flex/grid properties
+      - Use DOM data as primary source for layout properties
+      - Extract real flex/grid configurations (display, flexDirection, justifyContent, alignItems, gap)
+      - Use actual element bounds for responsive breakpoint decisions
+      - Preserve identified patterns from DOM structure
+      ` : ""}
+
+      ## Template Generation
+
+      1. **DOM Structure**:
+         - Semantic HTML5 tags: <header>, <nav>, <main>, <aside>, <section>, <footer>
          - ARIA roles and accessibility attributes
-         - Device-specific structure:
-           * mobile: Single column, stacked sections, touch targets ≥44px
-           * desktop: Multi-column grids, hover states, larger hit areas
-           * tablet: Hybrid layouts, flexible columns
-           * responsive: Breakpoint-driven adaptive layouts (mobile-first)
-         - In 'explore' mode: Each variant structurally DISTINCT
-      4. **Define Component Hierarchy**: High-level array of main layout regions
-         Example: ["header", "main-content", "sidebar", "footer"]
-      5. **Generate CSS Layout Rules**:
-         - Focus ONLY on layout (Grid, Flexbox, position, alignment, gap, etc.)
-         - Use CSS Custom Properties for spacing/breakpoints: var(--spacing-4), var(--breakpoint-md)
+         - Use key_components from selected concept
+         ${dom_structure_available ? "- Base on extracted DOM tree from .intermediates" : "- Infer from visual analysis"}
+         - Device-specific optimizations for {device_type}
+
+      2. **Component Hierarchy**:
+         - Array of main layout regions
+         - Derived from selected concept's key_components
+
+      3. **CSS Layout Rules**:
+         - Implement selected layout_pattern
+         ${dom_structure_available ? "- Use real layout properties from DOM structure data" : "- Focus on Grid, Flexbox, position, alignment"}
+         - Use CSS Custom Properties: var(--spacing-*), var(--breakpoint-*)
          - Device-specific styles (mobile-first @media for responsive)
          - NO colors, NO fonts, NO shadows - layout structure only
 
-  ## Output Format
-  Return JSON object with layout_templates array.
-  Each template must include:
-  - target (string)
-  - variant_id (string, e.g., "layout-1")
-  - source_image_path (string, REQUIRED): Path to the primary reference image used for this layout analysis
-    * For image input: Use the actual image file path from {images_pattern}
-    * For URL input: Use the screenshot path if available, or empty string
-    * For text/prompt input: Use empty string
-    * Example: "{base_path}/screenshots/home.png"
-  - device_type (string)
-  - design_philosophy (string)
-  - dom_structure (JSON object)
-  - component_hierarchy (array of strings)
-  - css_layout_rules (string)
+      ## Output Files
 
-  ## Notes
-  - Structure only, no visual styling
-  - Use var() for all spacing/sizing
-  - Layouts must be structurally distinct in explore mode
-  - Write complete layout-templates.json
-`
+      Generate 2 files:
+
+      1. **layout-templates.json** - {task.output_file}
+         Write single-template JSON object with:
+         - target: "{task.target}"
+         - variant_id: "layout-{task.variant_id}"
+         - source_image_path (string): Reference image path
+         - device_type: "{device_type}"
+         - design_philosophy (string from selected concept)
+         - dom_structure (JSON object)
+         - component_hierarchy (array of strings)
+         - css_layout_rules (string)
+
+      ## Critical Requirements
+      - ✅ Use Write() tool to generate JSON file
+      - ✅ Single template for {task.target} variant {task.variant_id}
+      - ✅ Structure only, no visual styling
+      - ✅ Token-based CSS (var())
+      - ✅ Can use Exa MCP to research modern layout patterns and obtain code examples (Explore/Text mode)
+      - ✅ Maintain consistency with selected concept
+    `
 ```
 
-**Output**: Agent returns JSON with `layout_templates` array
+**Output**: Agent generates multiple layout template files (one per selected concept)
 
-### Step 2: Write Output File
+### Step 3: Verify Output Files
 ```bash
-# Take JSON output from agent
-bash(echo '{agent_json_output}' > {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
+# Count generated files
+expected_count = total_tasks
+actual_count = bash(ls {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-*.json | wc -l)
 
-# Verify output
-bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
-bash(cat {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json | grep -q "layout_templates" && echo "valid")
+# Verify all files were created
+IF actual_count == expected_count:
+    REPORT: "✓ All {expected_count} layout template files generated"
+ELSE:
+    ERROR: "Expected {expected_count} files, found {actual_count}"
+
+# Verify file structure (sample check)
+bash(cat {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-{first_target}-1.json | grep -q "variant_id" && echo "valid structure")
 ```
 
-**Output**: `layout-templates.json` created and verified
+**Output**: All layout template files created and verified (one file per selected concept)
 
 ## Completion
 
@@ -183,9 +695,10 @@ bash(cat {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json | grep -q "layout_t
 ```javascript
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Setup and input validation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating inputs"},
-  {content: "Layout research (explore mode)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Researching layout patterns"},
-  {content: "Layout analysis and synthesis (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating layout templates"},
-  {content: "Write layout-templates.json", status: "completed", activeForm: "Saving templates"}
+  {content: "Layout concept analysis (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing layout patterns"},
+  {content: "User selection confirmation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Confirming selections"},
+  {content: "Generate layout templates (parallel)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating templates"},
+  {content: "Verify output files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Verifying files"}
 ]});
 ```
 
@@ -195,25 +708,38 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 
 Configuration:
 - Session: {session_id}
-- Extraction Mode: {extraction_mode} (imitate/explore)
 - Device Type: {device_type}
-- Targets: {targets}
-- Variants per Target: {variants_count}
-- Total Templates: {targets.length × variants_count}
+- Targets: {targets.join(", ")}
+- Total Templates: {total_tasks} ({targets.length} targets with multi-selection)
+{IF has_urls AND dom_structure_available:
+- 🔍 URL Mode: DOM structure extracted from {len(url_list)} URL(s)
+- Accuracy: Real flex/grid properties from live pages
+}
+{IF has_urls AND NOT dom_structure_available:
+- ⚠️ URL Mode: Chrome DevTools unavailable, used visual analysis fallback
+}
 
-{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
-Layout Research:
-- {targets.length} inspiration files generated
-- Pattern search focused on {device_type} layouts
+User Selections:
+{FOR each target in targets:
+- {target}: {selections_per_target[target].concept_names.join(", ")} ({selections_per_target[target].selected_indices.length} variants)
 }
 
 Generated Templates:
-{FOR each template: - Target: {template.target} | Variant: {template.variant_id} | Philosophy: {template.design_philosophy}}
+{base_path}/layout-extraction/
+{FOR each target in targets:
+  {FOR each variant_id in range(1, selections_per_target[target].selected_indices.length + 1):
+    └── layout-{target}-{variant_id}.json
+  }
+}
 
-Output File:
-- {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json
+Intermediate Files:
+- {base_path}/.intermediates/layout-analysis/
+  ├── analysis-options.json (concept proposals + user selections embedded)
+  {IF dom_structure_available:
+  ├── dom-structure-*.json ({len(url_list)} DOM extracts)
+  }
 
-Next: /workflow:ui-design:generate will combine these structural templates with style systems to produce final prototypes.
+Next: /workflow:ui-design:generate will combine these structural templates with design systems to produce final prototypes.
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands
@@ -221,23 +747,22 @@ Next: /workflow:ui-design:generate will combine these structural templates with
 ### Path Operations
 ```bash
 # Find design directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
+bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-run-*" | head -1)
 
 # Create output directories
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction)
-bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations)  # explore mode only
 ```
 
 ### Validation Commands
 ```bash
 # Check if already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json && echo "exists")
+bash(find {base_path}/layout-extraction -name "layout-*.json" -print -quit | grep -q . && echo "exists")
 
-# Validate JSON structure
-bash(cat layout-templates.json | grep -q "layout_templates" && echo "valid")
+# Count generated files
+bash(ls {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-*.json | wc -l)
 
-# Count templates
-bash(cat layout-templates.json | grep -c "\"target\":")
+# Validate JSON structure (sample check)
+bash(cat {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-{first_target}-1.json | grep -q "variant_id" && echo "valid")
 ```
 
 ### File Operations
@@ -246,9 +771,6 @@ bash(cat layout-templates.json | grep -c "\"target\":")
 bash(ls {images_pattern})
 Read({image_path})
 
-# Write inspiration files (explore mode)
-Write({base_path}/layout-extraction/_inspirations/{target}-layout-ideas.txt, content)
-
 # Write layout templates
 bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
 ```
@@ -257,27 +779,29 @@ bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json)
 
 ```
 {base_path}/
-└── layout-extraction/
-    ├── layout-templates.json         # Structural layout templates
-    ├── layout-space-analysis.json    # Layout directions (explore mode only)
-    └── _inspirations/                 # Explore mode only
-        └── {target}-layout-ideas.txt  # Layout inspiration research
+├── .intermediates/                    # Intermediate analysis files
+│   └── layout-analysis/
+│       ├── analysis-options.json      # Generated layout concepts + user selections (embedded)
+│       └── dom-structure-{target}.json   # Extracted DOM structure (URL mode only)
+└── layout-extraction/                 # Final layout templates
+    └── layout-{target}-{variant}.json # Structural layout template JSON
 ```
 
-## layout-templates.json Format
+## Layout Template File Format
+
+Each `layout-{target}-{variant}.json` file contains a single template:
 
 ```json
 {
   "extraction_metadata": {
     "session_id": "...",
     "input_mode": "image|url|prompt|hybrid",
-    "extraction_mode": "imitate|explore",
     "device_type": "desktop|mobile|tablet|responsive",
     "timestamp": "...",
-    "variants_count": 3,
-    "targets": ["home", "dashboard"]
+    "target": "home",
+    "variant_id": "layout-1"
   },
-  "layout_templates": [
+  "template":
     {
       "target": "home",
       "variant_id": "layout-1",
@@ -332,8 +856,8 @@ ERROR: Invalid target name
 ERROR: Agent task failed
 → Check agent output, retry with simplified prompt
 
-ERROR: MCP search failed (explore mode)
-→ Check network, retry
+ERROR: MCP search failed
+→ Check network connection, retry command
 ```
 
 ### Recovery Strategies
@@ -343,30 +867,16 @@ ERROR: MCP search failed (explore mode)
 
 ## Key Features
 
+- **Auto-Trigger URL Mode** - Automatically extracts DOM structure when --urls provided (no manual flag needed)
+- **Hybrid Extraction Strategy** - Combines real DOM structure data with AI visual analysis
+- **Accurate Layout Properties** - Chrome DevTools extracts real flex/grid configurations, bounds, and hierarchy
 - **Separation of Concerns** - Decouples layout (structure) from style (visuals)
-- **Structural Exploration** - Explore mode enables A/B testing of different layouts
+- **Multi-Selection Workflow** - Generate N concepts → User selects multiple → Parallel template generation
+- **Structural Exploration** - Enables A/B testing of different layouts through multi-selection
 - **Token-Based Layout** - CSS uses `var()` placeholders for instant design system adaptation
 - **Device-Specific** - Tailored structures for different screen sizes
-- **Foundation for Assembly** - Provides structural blueprint for refactored `generate` command
+- **Graceful Fallback** - Falls back to visual analysis if Chrome DevTools unavailable
+- **Foundation for Assembly** - Provides structural blueprint for prototype generation
 - **Agent-Powered** - Deep structural analysis with AI
 
-## Integration
 
-**Workflow Position**: Between style extraction and prototype generation
-
-**New Workflow**:
-1. `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → `style-cards.json` (Visual tokens)
-2. `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate` → `design-tokens.json` (Final visual system)
-3. `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → `layout-templates.json` (Structural templates)
-4. `/workflow:ui-design:generate` (Refactored as assembler):
-   - **Reads**: `design-tokens.json` + `layout-templates.json`
-   - **Action**: For each style × layout combination:
-     1. Build HTML from `dom_structure`
-     2. Create layout CSS from `css_layout_rules`
-     3. Link design tokens CSS
-     4. Inject placeholder content
-   - **Output**: Complete token-driven HTML/CSS prototypes
-
-**Input**: Reference images, URLs, or text prompts
-**Output**: `layout-templates.json` for `/workflow:ui-design:generate`
-**Next**: `/workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id}`

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/reference-page-generator.md

@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+---
+name: workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator
+description: Generate multi-component reference pages and documentation from design run extraction
+argument-hint: "[--design-run <path>] [--package-name <name>] [--output-dir <path>]"
+allowed-tools: Read,Write,Bash,Task,TodoWrite
+auto-continue: true
+---
+
+# UI Design: Reference Page Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+Converts design run extraction results into shareable reference package with:
+- Interactive multi-component preview (preview.html + preview.css)
+- Component layout templates (layout-templates.json)
+
+**Role**: Takes existing design run (from `import-from-code` or other extraction commands) and generates preview pages for easy reference.
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+/workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator [FLAGS]
+
+# Flags
+--design-run <path>      Design run directory path (required)
+--package-name <name>    Package name for reference (required)
+--output-dir <path>      Output directory (default: .workflow/reference_style)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Phase 0: Setup & Validation
+
+**Purpose**: Validate inputs, prepare output directory
+
+**Operations**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Validate required parameters
+if [ -z "$design_run" ] || [ -z "$package_name" ]; then
+  echo "ERROR: --design-run and --package-name are required"
+  echo "USAGE: /workflow:ui-design:reference-page-generator --design-run <path> --package-name <name>"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+# 2. Validate package name format (lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only)
+if ! [[ "$package_name" =~ ^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$ ]]; then
+  echo "ERROR: Invalid package name. Use lowercase, alphanumeric, and hyphens only."
+  echo "EXAMPLE: main-app-style-v1"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+# 3. Validate design run exists
+if [ ! -d "$design_run" ]; then
+  echo "ERROR: Design run not found: $design_run"
+  echo "HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code' first to create design run"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+# 4. Check required extraction files exist
+required_files=(
+  "$design_run/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json"
+  "$design_run/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json"
+)
+
+for file in "${required_files[@]}"; do
+  if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
+    echo "ERROR: Required file not found: $file"
+    echo "HINT: Ensure design run has style and layout extraction results"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+done
+
+# 5. Setup output directory and validate
+output_dir="${output_dir:-.workflow/reference_style}"
+package_dir="${output_dir}/${package_name}"
+
+# Check if package directory exists and is not empty
+if [ -d "$package_dir" ] && [ "$(ls -A $package_dir 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
+  # Directory exists - check if it's a valid package or just a directory
+  if [ -f "$package_dir/metadata.json" ]; then
+    # Valid package - safe to overwrite
+    existing_version=$(jq -r '.version // "unknown"' "$package_dir/metadata.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
+    echo "INFO: Overwriting existing package '$package_name' (version: $existing_version)"
+  else
+    # Directory exists but not a valid package
+    echo "ERROR: Directory '$package_dir' exists but is not a valid package"
+    echo "Use a different package name or remove the directory manually"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+fi
+
+mkdir -p "$package_dir"
+
+echo "[Phase 0] Setup Complete"
+echo "  Design Run: $design_run"
+echo "  Package: $package_name"
+echo "  Output: $package_dir"
+```
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Initialize todo list -->
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: 验证和准备", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "验证参数"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: 准备组件数据", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "复制布局模板"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: 生成预览页面", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "生成预览"}
+]
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 1: Prepare Component Data
+
+**Purpose**: Copy required files from design run to package directory
+
+**Operations**:
+
+```bash
+echo "[Phase 1] Preparing component data from design run"
+
+# 1. Copy layout templates as component patterns
+cp "${design_run}/layout-extraction/layout-templates.json" "${package_dir}/layout-templates.json"
+
+if [ ! -f "${package_dir}/layout-templates.json" ]; then
+  echo "ERROR: Failed to copy layout templates"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+# Count components from layout templates
+component_count=$(jq -r '.layout_templates | length // 0' "${package_dir}/layout-templates.json" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
+echo "  ✓ Layout templates copied (${component_count} components)"
+
+# 2. Copy design tokens (required for preview generation)
+cp "${design_run}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json" "${package_dir}/design-tokens.json"
+
+if [ ! -f "${package_dir}/design-tokens.json" ]; then
+  echo "ERROR: Failed to copy design tokens"
+  exit 1
+fi
+echo "  ✓ Design tokens copied"
+
+# 3. Copy animation tokens if exists (optional)
+if [ -f "${design_run}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json" ]; then
+  cp "${design_run}/animation-extraction/animation-tokens.json" "${package_dir}/animation-tokens.json"
+  echo "  ✓ Animation tokens copied"
+else
+  echo "  ○ Animation tokens not found (optional)"
+fi
+
+echo "[Phase 1] Component data preparation complete"
+```
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Mark Phase 1 complete, start Phase 2 -->
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: 准备组件数据", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "复制布局模板"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: 生成预览页面", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "生成预览"}
+]
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Preview Generation (Final Phase)
+
+**Purpose**: Generate interactive multi-component preview (preview.html + preview.css)
+
+**Agent Task**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(ui-design-agent): `
+  [PREVIEW_SHOWCASE_GENERATION]
+  Generate interactive multi-component showcase panel for reference package
+
+  PACKAGE_DIR: ${package_dir} | PACKAGE_NAME: ${package_name}
+
+  ## Input Files (MUST READ ALL)
+
+  1. ${package_dir}/layout-templates.json (component layout patterns - REQUIRED)
+  2. ${package_dir}/design-tokens.json (design tokens - REQUIRED)
+  3. ${package_dir}/animation-tokens.json (optional, if exists)
+
+  ## Generation Task
+
+  Create interactive showcase with these sections:
+
+  ### Section 1: Colors
+  - Display all color categories as color swatches
+  - Show hex/rgb values
+  - Group by: brand, semantic, surface, text, border
+
+  ### Section 2: Typography
+  - Display typography scale (font sizes, weights)
+  - Show typography combinations if available
+  - Include font family examples
+  - **Display usage recommendations** (from design-tokens.json _metadata.usage_recommendations.typography):
+    * Common sizes table (small_text, body_text, heading)
+    * Common combinations with use cases
+
+  ### Section 3: Components
+  - Render all components from layout-templates.json (use layout_templates field)
+  - **Universal Components**: Display reusable multi-component showcases (buttons, inputs, cards, etc.)
+    * **Display usage_guide** (from layout-templates.json):
+      - Common sizes table with dimensions and use cases
+      - Variant recommendations (when to use primary/secondary/etc)
+      - Usage context list (typical scenarios)
+      - Accessibility tips checklist
+  - **Specialized Components**: Display module-specific components from code (feature-specific layouts, custom widgets)
+  - Display all variants side-by-side
+  - Show DOM structure with proper styling
+  - Include usage code snippets in <details> tags
+  - Clearly label component types (universal vs specialized)
+
+  ### Section 4: Spacing & Layout
+  - Visual spacing scale
+  - Border radius examples
+  - Shadow depth examples
+  - **Display spacing recommendations** (from design-tokens.json _metadata.usage_recommendations.spacing):
+    * Size guide table (tight/normal/loose categories)
+    * Common patterns with use cases and pixel values
+
+  ### Section 5: Animations (if available)
+  - Animation duration examples
+  - Easing function demonstrations
+
+  ## Output Requirements
+
+  Generate 2 files:
+  1. ${package_dir}/preview.html
+  2. ${package_dir}/preview.css
+
+  ### preview.html Structure:
+  - Complete standalone HTML file
+  - Responsive design with mobile-first approach
+  - Sticky navigation for sections
+  - Interactive component demonstrations
+  - Code snippets in collapsible <details> elements
+  - Footer with package metadata
+
+  ### preview.css Structure:
+  - CSS Custom Properties from design-tokens.json
+  - Typography combination classes
+  - Component classes from layout-templates.json
+  - Preview page layout styles
+  - Interactive demo styles
+
+  ## Critical Requirements
+  - ✅ Read ALL input files (layout-templates.json, design-tokens.json, animation-tokens.json if exists)
+  - ✅ Generate complete, interactive showcase HTML
+  - ✅ All CSS uses var() references to design tokens
+  - ✅ Display ALL components from layout-templates.json
+  - ✅ **Separate universal components from specialized components** in the showcase
+  - ✅ Display component DOM structures with proper styling
+  - ✅ Include usage code snippets
+  - ✅ Label each component type clearly (Universal / Specialized)
+  - ✅ **Display usage recommendations** when available:
+    - Typography: common_sizes, common_combinations (from _metadata.usage_recommendations)
+    - Components: usage_guide for universal components (from layout-templates)
+    - Spacing: size_guide, common_patterns (from _metadata.usage_recommendations)
+  - ✅ Gracefully handle missing usage data (display sections only if data exists)
+  - ✅ Use Write() to save both files:
+    - ${package_dir}/preview.html
+    - ${package_dir}/preview.css
+  - ❌ NO external research or MCP calls
+`
+```
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: Mark all complete -->
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: 验证和准备", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "验证参数"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: 准备组件数据", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "复制布局模板"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: 生成预览页面", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "生成预览"}
+]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+${output_dir}/
+└── ${package_name}/
+    ├── layout-templates.json    # Layout templates (copied from design run)
+    ├── design-tokens.json       # Design tokens (copied from design run)
+    ├── animation-tokens.json    # Animation tokens (copied from design run, optional)
+    ├── preview.html             # Interactive showcase (NEW)
+    └── preview.css              # Showcase styling (NEW)
+```
+
+## Completion Message
+
+```
+✅ Preview package generated!
+
+Package: {package_name}
+Location: {package_dir}
+
+Files:
+✓ layout-templates.json    {component_count} components
+✓ design-tokens.json       Design tokens
+✓ animation-tokens.json    Animation tokens {if exists: "✓" else: "○ (not found)"}
+✓ preview.html             Interactive showcase
+✓ preview.css              Showcase styling
+
+Open preview:
+  file://{absolute_path_to_package_dir}/preview.html
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Common Errors
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing --design-run or --package-name | Required parameters not provided | Provide both flags |
+| Invalid package name | Contains uppercase, special chars | Use lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only |
+| Design run not found | Incorrect path or design run doesn't exist | Verify design run path, run import-from-code first |
+| Missing extraction files | Design run incomplete | Ensure design run has style-extraction and layout-extraction results |
+| Layout templates copy failed | layout-templates.json not found | Run import-from-code with Layout Agent first |
+| Preview generation failed | Invalid design tokens | Check design-tokens.json format |
+
+---
+

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/style-extract.md

@@ -1,45 +1,142 @@
 ---
 name: style-extract
-description: Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's analysis
-argument-hint: "[--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--mode <imitate|explore>] [--variants <count>]"
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
+description: Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude analysis with variant generation or refinement mode
+argument-hint: "[--design-id <id>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--urls "<list>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--variants <count>] [--interactive] [--refine]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*), mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page(*), mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script(*)
 ---
 
 # Style Extraction Command
 
 ## Overview
-Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's built-in analysis. Generates `style-cards.json` with multiple design variants containing token proposals for consolidation.
+Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's built-in analysis. Supports two modes:
+1. **Exploration Mode** (default): Generate multiple contrasting design variants
+2. **Refinement Mode** (`--refine`): Refine a single existing design through detailed adjustments
 
 **Strategy**: AI-Driven Design Space Exploration
 - **Claude-Native**: 100% Claude analysis, no external tools
-- **Single Output**: `style-cards.json` with embedded token proposals
+- **Direct Output**: Complete design systems (design-tokens.json)
 - **Flexible Input**: Images, text prompts, or both (hybrid mode)
-- **Maximum Contrast**: AI generates maximally divergent design directions
+- **Dual Mode**: Exploration (multiple contrasting variants) or Refinement (single design fine-tuning)
+- **Production-Ready**: WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors, semantic naming
 
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Detect Input Mode, Extraction Mode & Base Path
 ```bash
 # Detect input source
-# Priority: --images + --prompt → hybrid | --images → image | --prompt → text
+# Priority: --urls + --images + --prompt → hybrid-url | --urls + --images → url-image | --urls → url | --images + --prompt → hybrid | --images → image | --prompt → text
 
-# Determine extraction mode
-# Priority: --mode parameter → default "imitate"
-extraction_mode = --mode OR "imitate"  # "imitate" or "explore"
+# Parse URLs if provided (format: "target:url,target:url,...")
+IF --urls:
+    url_list = []
+    FOR pair IN split(--urls, ","):
+        IF ":" IN pair:
+            target, url = pair.split(":", 1)
+            url_list.append({target: target.strip(), url: url.strip()})
+        ELSE:
+            # Single URL without target
+            url_list.append({target: "page", url: pair.strip()})
 
-# Set variants count based on mode
-IF extraction_mode == "imitate":
-    variants_count = 1  # Force single variant for imitate mode (ignore --variants)
-ELSE IF extraction_mode == "explore":
-    variants_count = --variants OR 3  # Default to 3 for explore mode
+    has_urls = true
+    primary_url = url_list[0].url  # First URL as primary source
+ELSE:
+    has_urls = false
+
+# Detect refinement mode
+refine_mode = --refine OR false
+
+# Set variants count
+# Refinement mode: Force variants_count = 1 (ignore user-provided --variants)
+# Exploration mode: Use --variants or default to 3 (range: 1-5)
+IF refine_mode:
+    variants_count = 1
+    REPORT: "🔧 Refinement mode enabled: Will generate 1 refined design system"
+ELSE:
+    variants_count = --variants OR 3
     VALIDATE: 1 <= variants_count <= 5
+    REPORT: "🔍 Exploration mode: Will generate {variants_count} contrasting design directions"
 
-# Determine base path
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)  # Auto-detect
-# OR use --base-path / --session parameters
+# Determine base path with priority: --design-id > --session > auto-detect
+if [ -n "$DESIGN_ID" ]; then
+  # Exact match by design ID
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "${DESIGN_ID}" -type d -print -quit)
+elif [ -n "$SESSION_ID" ]; then
+  # Latest in session
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow/WFS-$SESSION_ID -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+else
+  # Latest globally
+  relative_path=$(find .workflow -name "design-run-*" -type d -printf "%T@ %p\n" 2>/dev/null | sort -nr | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
+fi
+
+# Validate and convert to absolute path
+if [ -z "$relative_path" ] || [ ! -d "$relative_path" ]; then
+  echo "❌ ERROR: Design run not found"
+  echo "💡 HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:list' to see available design runs"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+base_path=$(cd "$relative_path" && pwd)
+bash(echo "✓ Base path: $base_path")
 ```
 
-### Step 2: Load Inputs
+### Step 2: Extract Computed Styles (URL Mode - Auto-Trigger)
+```bash
+# AUTO-TRIGGER: If URLs are available (from --urls parameter or capture metadata), automatically extract real CSS values
+# This provides accurate design tokens to supplement visual analysis
+
+# Priority 1: Check for --urls parameter
+IF has_urls:
+    url_to_extract = primary_url
+    url_source = "--urls parameter"
+
+# Priority 2: Check for URL metadata from capture phase
+ELSE IF exists({base_path}/.metadata/capture-urls.json):
+    capture_urls = Read({base_path}/.metadata/capture-urls.json)
+    url_to_extract = capture_urls[0]  # Use first URL
+    url_source = "capture metadata"
+ELSE:
+    url_to_extract = null
+
+# Execute extraction if URL available
+IF url_to_extract AND mcp_chrome_devtools_available:
+    REPORT: "🔍 Auto-triggering URL mode: Extracting computed styles from {url_source}"
+    REPORT: "   URL: {url_to_extract}"
+
+    # Read extraction script
+    script_content = Read(~/.claude/scripts/extract-computed-styles.js)
+
+    # Open page in Chrome DevTools
+    mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page(url=url_to_extract)
+
+    # Execute extraction script directly
+    result = mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script(function=script_content)
+
+    # Save computed styles to intermediates directory
+    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis)
+    Write({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/computed-styles.json, result)
+
+    computed_styles_available = true
+    REPORT: "   ✅ Computed styles extracted and saved"
+ELSE:
+    computed_styles_available = false
+    IF url_to_extract:
+        REPORT: "⚠️ Chrome DevTools MCP not available, falling back to visual analysis"
+```
+
+**Extraction Script Reference**: `~/.claude/scripts/extract-computed-styles.js`
+
+**Usage**: Read the script file and use content directly in `mcp__chrome-devtools__evaluate_script()`
+
+**Script returns**:
+- `metadata`: Extraction timestamp, URL, method
+- `tokens`: Organized design tokens (colors, borderRadii, shadows, fontSizes, fontWeights, spacing)
+
+**Benefits**:
+- ✅ Pixel-perfect accuracy for border-radius, box-shadow, padding, etc.
+- ✅ Eliminates guessing from visual analysis
+- ✅ Provides ground truth for design tokens
+
+### Step 3: Load Inputs
 ```bash
 # For image mode
 bash(ls {images_pattern})  # Expand glob pattern
@@ -52,83 +149,493 @@ Read({image_path})  # Load each image
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Memory Check (Skip if Already Done)
+### Step 3: Memory Check
 ```bash
-# Check if already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "exists")
+# 1. Check if inputs cached in session memory
+IF session_has_inputs: SKIP Step 2 file reading
+
+# 2. Check if output already exists
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
+IF exists: SKIP to completion
 ```
 
-**If exists**: Skip to completion message
+---
 
-**Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `loaded_images[]` or `prompt_guidance`
+**Phase 0 Output**: `input_mode`, `base_path`, `extraction_mode`, `variants_count`, `loaded_images[]` or `prompt_guidance`, `has_urls`, `url_list[]`, `computed_styles_available`
 
-## Phase 1: Design Space Analysis (Explore Mode Only)
+## Phase 1: Design Direction or Refinement Options Generation
 
-### Step 1: Check Extraction Mode
-```bash
-# Check extraction mode
-# extraction_mode == "imitate" → skip this phase
-# extraction_mode == "explore" → execute this phase
-```
-
-**If imitate mode**: Skip to Phase 2
-
-### Step 2: Load Project Context (Explore Mode)
+### Step 1: Load Project Context
 ```bash
 # Load brainstorming context if available
-bash(test -f {base_path}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md && cat it)
+bash(test -f {base_path}/.brainstorming/role analysis documents && cat it)
+
+# Load existing design system if refinement mode
+IF refine_mode:
+    existing_tokens = Read({base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Generate Divergent Directions (Claude Native)
-AI analyzes requirements and generates `variants_count` maximally contrasting design directions:
+### Step 2: Generate Options (Agent Task 1 - Mode-Specific)
+**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)`
 
-**Input**: User prompt + project context + image count
-**Analysis**: 6D attribute space (color saturation, visual weight, formality, organic/geometric, innovation, density)
-**Output**: JSON with divergent_directions, each having:
-- philosophy_name (2-3 words)
-- design_attributes (specific scores)
-- search_keywords (3-5 keywords)
-- anti_keywords (2-3 keywords)
-- rationale (contrast explanation)
+**Exploration Mode** (default): Generate contrasting design directions
+**Refinement Mode** (`--refine`): Generate refinement options for existing design
 
-### Step 4: Write Design Space Analysis
+```javascript
+// Conditional agent task based on refine_mode
+IF NOT refine_mode:
+    // EXPLORATION MODE
+    Task(ui-design-agent): `
+      [DESIGN_DIRECTION_GENERATION_TASK]
+      Generate {variants_count} maximally contrasting design directions with visual previews
+
+      SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: explore | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+
+      ## Input Analysis
+      - User prompt: {prompt_guidance}
+      - Visual references: {loaded_images if available}
+      - Project context: {brainstorming_context if available}
+
+      ## Analysis Rules
+      - Analyze 6D attribute space: color saturation, visual weight, formality, organic/geometric, innovation, density
+      - Generate {variants_count} directions with MAXIMUM contrast
+      - Each direction must be distinctly different (min distance score: 0.7)
+
+      ## Generate for EACH Direction
+      1. **Core Philosophy**:
+         - philosophy_name (2-3 words, e.g., "Minimalist & Airy")
+         - design_attributes (6D scores 0-1)
+         - search_keywords (3-5 keywords)
+         - anti_keywords (2-3 keywords to avoid)
+         - rationale (why this is distinct from others)
+
+      2. **Visual Preview Elements**:
+         - primary_color (OKLCH format)
+         - secondary_color (OKLCH format)
+         - accent_color (OKLCH format)
+         - font_family_heading (specific font name)
+         - font_family_body (specific font name)
+         - border_radius_base (e.g., "0.5rem")
+         - mood_description (1-2 sentences describing the feel)
+
+      ## Output
+      Write single JSON file: {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json
+
+      Use schema from INTERACTIVE-DATA-SPEC.md (Style Extract: analysis-options.json)
+
+      CRITICAL: Use Write() tool immediately after generating complete JSON
+    `
+ELSE:
+    // REFINEMENT MODE
+    Task(ui-design-agent): `
+      [DESIGN_REFINEMENT_OPTIONS_TASK]
+      Generate refinement options for existing design system
+
+      SESSION: {session_id} | MODE: refine | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+
+      ## Existing Design System
+      - design-tokens.json: {existing_tokens}
+
+      ## Input Guidance
+      - User prompt: {prompt_guidance}
+      - Visual references: {loaded_images if available}
+
+      ## Refinement Categories
+      Generate 8-12 refinement options across these categories:
+
+      1. **Intensity/Degree Adjustments** (2-3 options):
+         - Color intensity: more vibrant ↔ more muted
+         - Visual weight: bolder ↔ lighter
+         - Density: more compact ↔ more spacious
+
+      2. **Specific Attribute Tuning** (3-4 options):
+         - Border radius: sharper corners ↔ rounder edges
+         - Shadow depth: subtler shadows ↔ deeper elevation
+         - Typography scale: tighter scale ↔ more contrast
+         - Spacing scale: tighter rhythm ↔ more breathing room
+
+      3. **Context-Specific Variations** (2-3 options):
+         - Dark mode optimization
+         - Mobile-specific adjustments
+         - High-contrast accessibility mode
+
+      4. **Component-Level Customization** (1-2 options):
+         - Button styling emphasis
+         - Card/container treatment
+         - Form input refinements
+
+      ## Output Format
+      Each option:
+      - category: "intensity|attribute|context|component"
+      - option_id: unique identifier
+      - label: Short descriptive name (e.g., "More Vibrant Colors")
+      - description: What changes (2-3 sentences)
+      - preview_changes: Key token adjustments preview
+      - impact_scope: Which tokens affected
+
+      ## Output
+      Write single JSON file: {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json
+
+      Use refinement schema:
+      {
+        "mode": "refinement",
+        "base_design": "style-1",
+        "refinement_options": [array of refinement options]
+      }
+
+      CRITICAL: Use Write() tool immediately after generating complete JSON
+    `
+```
+
+### Step 3: Verify Options File Created
 ```bash
-bash(echo '{design_space_analysis}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json)
+bash(test -f {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json && echo "created")
 
-# Verify output
-bash(test -f design-space-analysis.json && echo "saved")
+# Quick validation
+bash(cat {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json | grep -q "design_directions" && echo "valid")
 ```
 
-**Output**: `design-space-analysis.json` for consolidation phase
+**Output**: `analysis-options.json` with design direction options
 
-## Phase 2: Style Synthesis & File Write
+---
 
-### Step 1: Claude Native Analysis
-AI generates `variants_count` design style proposals:
+## Phase 1.5: User Confirmation (Optional - Triggered by --interactive)
 
-**Input**:
-- Input mode (image/text/hybrid)
-- Visual references or text guidance
-- Design space analysis (explore mode only)
-- Variant-specific directions (explore mode only)
+**Purpose**:
+- **Exploration Mode**: Allow user to select preferred design direction(s)
+- **Refinement Mode**: Allow user to select refinement options to apply
 
-**Analysis Rules**:
-- **Explore mode**: Each variant follows pre-defined philosophy and attributes, maintains maximum contrast
-- **Imitate mode**: High-fidelity replication of reference design
-- OKLCH color format
-- Complete token proposals (colors, typography, spacing, border_radius, shadows, breakpoints)
-- WCAG AA accessibility (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
+**Trigger Condition**: Execute this phase ONLY if `--interactive` flag is present
 
-**Output Format**: `style-cards.json` with:
-- extraction_metadata (session_id, input_mode, extraction_mode, timestamp, variants_count)
-- style_cards[] (id, name, description, design_philosophy, preview, proposed_tokens)
-
-### Step 2: Write Style Cards
+### Step 1: Check Interactive Flag
 ```bash
-bash(echo '{style_cards_json}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+# Skip this entire phase if --interactive flag is not present
+IF NOT --interactive:
+    SKIP to Phase 2
+    IF refine_mode:
+        REPORT: "ℹ️ Non-interactive refinement mode: Will apply all suggested refinements"
+    ELSE:
+        REPORT: "ℹ️ Non-interactive mode: Will generate all {variants_count} variants"
+
+REPORT: "🎯 Interactive mode enabled: User selection required"
 ```
 
-**Output**: `style-cards.json` with `variants_count` complete variants
+### Step 2: Load and Present Options (Mode-Specific)
+```bash
+# Read options file
+options = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+
+# Branch based on mode
+IF NOT refine_mode:
+    # EXPLORATION MODE
+    design_directions = options.design_directions
+ELSE:
+    # REFINEMENT MODE
+    refinement_options = options.refinement_options
+```
+
+### Step 3: Present Options to User (Mode-Specific)
+
+**Exploration Mode**:
+```
+📋 Design Direction Options
+
+We've generated {variants_count} contrasting design directions for your review.
+Please select the direction(s) you'd like to develop into complete design systems.
+
+{FOR each direction in design_directions:
+  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+  Option {direction.index}: {direction.philosophy_name}
+  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+
+  Philosophy: {direction.rationale}
+
+  Visual Preview:
+  • Colors: {direction.preview.primary_color} (primary), {direction.preview.accent_color} (accent)
+  • Typography: {direction.preview.font_family_heading} (headings), {direction.preview.font_family_body} (body)
+  • Border Radius: {direction.preview.border_radius_base}
+  • Mood: {direction.preview.mood_description}
+
+  Design Attributes:
+  • Color Saturation: {direction.design_attributes.color_saturation * 100}%
+  • Visual Weight: {direction.design_attributes.visual_weight * 100}%
+  • Formality: {direction.design_attributes.formality * 100}%
+  • Innovation: {direction.design_attributes.innovation * 100}%
+
+  Keywords: {join(direction.search_keywords, ", ")}
+  Avoiding: {join(direction.anti_keywords, ", ")}
+}
+
+═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+```
+
+**Refinement Mode**:
+```
+📋 Design Refinement Options
+
+We've analyzed your existing design system and generated refinement options.
+Please select the refinement(s) you'd like to apply.
+
+Base Design: style-1
+
+{FOR each option in refinement_options grouped by category:
+  ━━━ {category_name} ━━━
+
+  {FOR each refinement in category_options:
+    [{refinement.option_id}] {refinement.label}
+    {refinement.description}
+    Preview: {refinement.preview_changes}
+    Affects: {refinement.impact_scope}
+  }
+}
+
+═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
+```
+
+### Step 4: Capture User Selection and Update Analysis JSON
+
+**Exploration Mode Interaction**:
+```javascript
+// Use AskUserQuestion tool for multi-selection
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Which design direction(s) would you like to develop into complete design systems?",
+    header: "Style Choice",
+    multiSelect: true,  // Multi-selection enabled
+    options: [
+      {FOR each direction:
+        label: "Option {direction.index}: {direction.philosophy_name}",
+        description: "{direction.mood_description}"
+      }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+
+// Parse user response (array of selections)
+selected_options = user_answer
+
+// Check for user cancellation
+IF selected_options == null OR selected_options.length == 0:
+    REPORT: "⚠️ User canceled selection. Workflow terminated."
+    EXIT workflow
+
+// Extract option indices
+selected_indices = []
+FOR each selected_option_text IN selected_options:
+    match = selected_option_text.match(/Option (\d+):/)
+    IF match:
+        selected_indices.push(parseInt(match[1]))
+
+REPORT: "✅ Selected {selected_indices.length} design direction(s)"
+
+// Update analysis-options.json
+options_file = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+options_file.user_selection = {
+  "selected_at": NOW(),
+  "selected_indices": selected_indices,
+  "selection_count": selected_indices.length
+}
+Write({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json, JSON.stringify(options_file, indent=2))
+```
+
+**Refinement Mode Interaction**:
+```javascript
+// Use AskUserQuestion tool for multi-selection of refinements
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Which refinement(s) would you like to apply to your design system?",
+    header: "Refinements",
+    multiSelect: true,  // Multi-selection enabled
+    options: [
+      {FOR each refinement:
+        label: "{refinement.label}",
+        description: "{refinement.description} (Affects: {refinement.impact_scope})"
+      }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+
+// Parse user response
+selected_refinements = user_answer
+
+// Check for user cancellation
+IF selected_refinements == null OR selected_refinements.length == 0:
+    REPORT: "⚠️ User canceled selection. Workflow terminated."
+    EXIT workflow
+
+// Extract refinement option_ids
+selected_option_ids = []
+FOR each selected_text IN selected_refinements:
+    # Match against refinement labels to find option_ids
+    FOR each refinement IN refinement_options:
+        IF refinement.label IN selected_text:
+            selected_option_ids.push(refinement.option_id)
+
+REPORT: "✅ Selected {selected_option_ids.length} refinement(s)"
+
+// Update analysis-options.json
+options_file = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+options_file.user_selection = {
+  "selected_at": NOW(),
+  "selected_option_ids": selected_option_ids,
+  "selection_count": selected_option_ids.length
+}
+Write({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json, JSON.stringify(options_file, indent=2))
+```
+
+### Step 5: Confirmation Message (Mode-Specific)
+
+**Exploration Mode**:
+```
+✅ Selection recorded!
+
+You selected {selected_indices.length} design direction(s):
+{FOR each index IN selected_indices:
+  • Option {index} - {design_directions[index-1].philosophy_name}
+}
+
+Proceeding to generate {selected_indices.length} complete design system(s)...
+```
+
+**Refinement Mode**:
+```
+✅ Selection recorded!
+
+You selected {selected_option_ids.length} refinement(s):
+{FOR each id IN selected_option_ids:
+  • {refinement_by_id[id].label} ({refinement_by_id[id].category})
+}
+
+Proceeding to apply refinements and generate updated design system...
+```
+
+**Output**: Updated `analysis-options.json` with user's selection embedded
+
+## Phase 2: Design System Generation (Agent Task 2)
+
+**Executor**: `Task(ui-design-agent)` for selected variant(s)
+
+### Step 1: Load User Selection or Default to All
+```bash
+# Read analysis-options.json which may contain user_selection
+options = Read({base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json)
+
+# Check if user_selection field exists (interactive mode)
+IF options.user_selection AND options.user_selection.selected_indices:
+    # Interactive mode: Use user-selected variants
+    selected_indices = options.user_selection.selected_indices  # Array of selected indices (e.g., [1, 3])
+
+    REPORT: "🎯 Interactive mode: Using {selected_indices.length} user-selected variant(s)"
+ELSE:
+    # Non-interactive mode: Generate ALL variants (default behavior)
+    selected_indices = [1, 2, ..., variants_count]  # All indices from 1 to variants_count
+
+    REPORT: "ℹ️ Non-interactive mode: Generating all {variants_count} variant(s)"
+
+# Extract the selected direction details from options
+selected_directions = [options.design_directions[i-1] for i in selected_indices]  # 0-indexed array
+
+actual_variants_count = selected_indices.length
+REPORT: "📦 Generating {actual_variants_count} design system(s)..."
+```
+
+### Step 2: Create Output Directories
+```bash
+# Create directories for each selected variant
+FOR index IN 1..actual_variants_count:
+    bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/style-{index})
+```
+
+### Step 3: Launch Agent Tasks (Parallel)
+Generate design systems for ALL selected directions in parallel (max 5 concurrent):
+
+```javascript
+// Launch parallel tasks, one for each selected direction
+FOR variant_index IN 1..actual_variants_count:
+    selected_direction = selected_directions[variant_index - 1]  // 0-indexed
+
+    Task(ui-design-agent): `
+      [DESIGN_SYSTEM_GENERATION_TASK #{variant_index}/{actual_variants_count}]
+      Generate production-ready design system based on user-selected direction
+
+      SESSION: {session_id} | VARIANT: {variant_index}/{actual_variants_count} | BASE_PATH: {base_path}
+
+      USER SELECTION:
+      - Selected Direction: ${selected_direction.philosophy_name}
+      - Design Attributes: ${JSON.stringify(selected_direction.design_attributes)}
+      - Search Keywords: ${selected_direction.search_keywords.join(", ")}
+      - Anti-keywords: ${selected_direction.anti_keywords.join(", ")}
+      - Rationale: ${selected_direction.rationale}
+      - Preview Colors: Primary=${selected_direction.preview.primary_color}, Accent=${selected_direction.preview.accent_color}
+      - Preview Typography: Heading=${selected_direction.preview.font_family_heading}, Body=${selected_direction.preview.font_family_body}
+      - Preview Border Radius: ${selected_direction.preview.border_radius_base}
+
+      ## Input Analysis
+      - Input mode: {input_mode} (image/text/hybrid${has_urls ? "/url" : ""})
+      - Visual references: {loaded_images OR prompt_guidance}
+      ${computed_styles_available ? "- Computed styles: Use as ground truth (Read from .intermediates/style-analysis/computed-styles.json)" : ""}
+
+      ## Generation Rules
+      - Develop the selected design direction into a complete design system
+      - Use preview elements as foundation and expand with full token coverage
+      - Apply design_attributes to all token values:
+        * color_saturation → OKLCH chroma values
+        * visual_weight → font weights, shadow depths
+        * density → spacing scale compression/expansion
+        * formality → typography choices, border radius
+        * organic_geometric → border radius, shape patterns
+        * innovation → token naming, experimental values
+      - Honor search_keywords for design inspiration
+      - Avoid anti_keywords patterns
+      - All colors in OKLCH format ${computed_styles_available ? "(convert from computed RGB)" : ""}
+      - WCAG AA compliance: 4.5:1 text contrast, 3:1 UI contrast
+
+      ## Generate
+      Create complete design system in {base_path}/style-extraction/style-{variant_index}/
+
+  1. **design-tokens.json**:
+     - Complete token structure with ALL fields:
+       * colors (brand, surface, semantic, text, border) - OKLCH format
+       * typography (families, sizes, weights, line heights, letter spacing, combinations)
+       * typography.combinations: Predefined typography presets (heading-primary, heading-secondary, body-regular, body-emphasis, caption, label) using var() references
+       * spacing (0-24 scale)
+       * opacity (0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 90, 100)
+       * border_radius (none to full)
+       * shadows (sm to xl)
+       * component_styles (button, card, input variants) - component presets using var() references
+       * breakpoints (sm to 2xl)
+     - All colors in OKLCH format
+     ${extraction_mode == "explore" ? "- Start from preview colors and expand to full palette" : ""}
+     ${extraction_mode == "explore" && refinements.enabled ? "- Apply user refinements where specified" : ""}
+     - Common Tailwind CSS usage patterns in project (if extracting from existing project)
+
+  ## Critical Requirements
+  - ✅ Use Write() tool immediately for each file
+  - ✅ Write to style-{variant_index}/ directory
+  - ✅ Can use Exa MCP to research modern design patterns and obtain code examples (Explore/Text mode)
+  - ✅ Maintain consistency with user-selected direction
+    `
+```
+
+**Output**: {actual_variants_count} parallel agent tasks generate design-tokens.json for each variant
+
+## Phase 3: Verify Output
+
+### Step 1: Check Files Created
+```bash
+# Verify all design systems created
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-*/design-tokens.json | wc -l)
+
+# Validate structure
+bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
+```
+
+### Step 2: Verify File Sizes
+```bash
+bash(ls -lh {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/)
+```
+
+**Output**: `variants_count × 2` files verified
 
 ## Completion
 
@@ -137,7 +644,8 @@ bash(echo '{style_cards_json}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
 TodoWrite({todos: [
   {content: "Setup and input validation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating inputs"},
   {content: "Design space analysis (explore mode)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing design space"},
-  {content: "Style synthesis and file write", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating style cards"}
+  {content: "Design system generation (agent)", status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating design systems"},
+  {content: "Verify output files", status: "completed", activeForm: "Verifying files"}
 ]});
 ```
 
@@ -148,23 +656,37 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 Configuration:
 - Session: {session_id}
 - Extraction Mode: {extraction_mode} (imitate/explore)
-- Input Mode: {input_mode} (image/text/hybrid)
+- Input Mode: {input_mode} (image/text/hybrid{"/url" if has_urls else ""})
 - Variants: {variants_count}
-
-{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
-Design Space Analysis:
-- {variants_count} maximally contrasting design directions
-- Min contrast distance: {design_space_analysis.contrast_verification.min_pairwise_distance}
+- Production-Ready: Complete design systems generated
+{IF has_urls AND computed_styles_available:
+- 🔍 URL Mode: Computed styles extracted from {len(url_list)} URL(s)
+- Accuracy: Pixel-perfect design tokens from DOM
+}
+{IF has_urls AND NOT computed_styles_available:
+- ⚠️ URL Mode: Chrome DevTools unavailable, used visual analysis fallback
 }
 
-Generated Variants:
-{FOR each card: - {card.name} - {card.design_philosophy}}
+{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
+Design Direction Selection:
+- You selected: Option {selected_index} - {selected_direction.philosophy_name}
+- Generated from {variants_count} contrasting design direction options
+}
 
-Output Files:
-- {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json
-{IF extraction_mode == "explore": - {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json}
+Generated Files:
+{base_path}/style-extraction/
+└── style-1/design-tokens.json
 
-Next: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {variants_count}
+{IF computed_styles_available:
+Intermediate Analysis:
+{base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/computed-styles.json (extracted from {primary_url})
+}
+{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
+{base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json (design direction options + user selection)
+}
+
+Next: /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract --session {session_id} --targets "..."
+  OR: /workflow:ui-design:generate --session {session_id}
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands
@@ -172,7 +694,7 @@ Next: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {variant
 ### Path Operations
 ```bash
 # Find design directory
-bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-*" | head -1)
+bash(find .workflow -type d -name "design-run-*" | head -1)
 
 # Expand image pattern
 bash(ls {images_pattern})
@@ -184,60 +706,94 @@ bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/)
 ### Validation Commands
 ```bash
 # Check if already extracted
-bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json && echo "exists")
+bash(test -f {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json && echo "exists")
 
 # Count variants
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -c "\"id\": \"variant-")
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-* -d | wc -l)
 
-# Validate JSON
-bash(cat style-cards.json | grep -q "extraction_metadata" && echo "valid")
+# Validate JSON structure
+bash(cat {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/design-tokens.json | grep -q "colors" && echo "valid")
 ```
 
 ### File Operations
 ```bash
 # Load brainstorming context
-bash(test -f .brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md && cat it)
+bash(test -f .brainstorming/role analysis documents && cat it)
 
-# Write output
-bash(echo '{json}' > {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json)
+# Create directories (example for multiple variants)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/style-2)
+bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/style-extraction/style-3)
 
 # Verify output
-bash(test -f design-space-analysis.json && echo "saved")
+bash(ls {base_path}/style-extraction/style-1/)
+bash(test -f {base_path}/.intermediates/style-analysis/analysis-options.json && echo "saved")
 ```
 
 ## Output Structure
 
 ```
-{base_path}/style-extraction/
-├── style-cards.json              # Complete style variants with token proposals
-└── design-space-analysis.json    # Design directions (explore mode only)
+{base_path}/
+├── .intermediates/                  # Intermediate analysis files
+│   └── style-analysis/
+│       ├── computed-styles.json     # Extracted CSS values from DOM (if URL available)
+│       └── analysis-options.json    # Design direction options + user selection (explore mode only)
+└── style-extraction/                # Final design system
+    └── style-1/
+        └── design-tokens.json       # Production-ready design tokens
 ```
 
-## style-cards.json Format
+## design-tokens.json Format
 
 ```json
 {
-  "extraction_metadata": {"session_id": "...", "input_mode": "image|text|hybrid", "extraction_mode": "imitate|explore", "timestamp": "...", "variants_count": N},
-  "style_cards": [
-    {
-      "id": "variant-1", "name": "Style Name", "description": "...",
-      "design_philosophy": "Core principles",
-      "preview": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "background": "oklch(...)", "font_heading": "...", "border_radius": "..."},
-      "proposed_tokens": {
-        "colors": {"brand": {...}, "surface": {...}, "semantic": {...}, "text": {...}, "border": {...}},
-        "typography": {"font_family": {...}, "font_size": {...}, "font_weight": {...}, "line_height": {...}, "letter_spacing": {...}},
-        "spacing": {"0": "0", ..., "24": "6rem"},
-        "border_radius": {"none": "0", ..., "full": "9999px"},
-        "shadows": {"sm": "...", ..., "xl": "..."},
-        "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
-      }
+  "colors": {
+    "brand": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "accent": "oklch(...)"},
+    "surface": {"background": "oklch(...)", "elevated": "oklch(...)", "overlay": "oklch(...)"},
+    "semantic": {"success": "oklch(...)", "warning": "oklch(...)", "error": "oklch(...)", "info": "oklch(...)"},
+    "text": {"primary": "oklch(...)", "secondary": "oklch(...)", "tertiary": "oklch(...)", "inverse": "oklch(...)"},
+    "border": {"default": "oklch(...)", "strong": "oklch(...)", "subtle": "oklch(...)"}
+  },
+  "typography": {
+    "font_family": {...},
+    "font_size": {...},
+    "font_weight": {...},
+    "line_height": {...},
+    "letter_spacing": {...},
+    "combinations": {
+      "heading-primary": {"family": "var(--font-family-heading)", "size": "var(--font-size-3xl)", "weight": "var(--font-weight-bold)", "line_height": "var(--line-height-tight)", "letter_spacing": "var(--letter-spacing-tight)"},
+      "heading-secondary": {...},
+      "body-regular": {...},
+      "body-emphasis": {...},
+      "caption": {...},
+      "label": {...}
     }
-    // Repeat for all variants
-  ]
+  },
+  "spacing": {"0": "0", "1": "0.25rem", ..., "24": "6rem"},
+  "opacity": {"0": "0", "10": "0.1", "20": "0.2", "40": "0.4", "60": "0.6", "80": "0.8", "90": "0.9", "100": "1"},
+  "border_radius": {"none": "0", "sm": "0.25rem", ..., "full": "9999px"},
+  "shadows": {"sm": "...", "md": "...", "lg": "...", "xl": "..."},
+  "component_styles": {
+    "button": {
+      "primary": {"background": "var(--color-brand-primary)", "color": "var(--color-text-inverse)", "padding": "var(--spacing-3) var(--spacing-6)", "border_radius": "var(--border-radius-md)", "font_weight": "var(--font-weight-semibold)"},
+      "secondary": {...},
+      "tertiary": {...}
+    },
+    "card": {
+      "default": {"background": "var(--color-surface-elevated)", "padding": "var(--spacing-6)", "border_radius": "var(--border-radius-lg)", "shadow": "var(--shadow-md)"},
+      "interactive": {...}
+    },
+    "input": {
+      "default": {"border": "1px solid var(--color-border-default)", "padding": "var(--spacing-3)", "border_radius": "var(--border-radius-md)", "background": "var(--color-surface-background)"},
+      "focus": {...},
+      "error": {...}
+    }
+  },
+  "breakpoints": {"sm": "640px", ..., "2xl": "1536px"}
 }
 ```
 
-**Requirements**: All colors in OKLCH format, complete token proposals, semantic naming
+**Requirements**: OKLCH colors, complete coverage, semantic naming, WCAG AA compliance, typography combinations, component style presets, opacity scale
 
 ## Error Handling
 
@@ -255,17 +811,16 @@ ERROR: Claude JSON parsing error
 
 ## Key Features
 
+- **Auto-Trigger URL Mode** - Automatically extracts computed styles when --urls provided (no manual flag needed)
+- **Direct Design System Generation** - Complete design-tokens.json + style-guide.md in one step
+- **Hybrid Extraction Strategy** - Combines computed CSS values (ground truth) with AI visual analysis
+- **Pixel-Perfect Accuracy** - Chrome DevTools extracts exact border-radius, shadows, spacing values
 - **AI-Driven Design Space Exploration** - 6D attribute space analysis for maximum contrast
 - **Variant-Specific Directions** - Each variant has unique philosophy, keywords, anti-patterns
 - **Maximum Contrast Guarantee** - Variants maximally distant in attribute space
-- **Claude-Native** - No external tools, fast deterministic synthesis
-- **Flexible Input** - Images, text, or hybrid mode
-- **Production-Ready** - OKLCH colors, WCAG AA, semantic naming
+- **Flexible Input** - Images, text, URLs, or hybrid mode
+- **Graceful Fallback** - Falls back to pure visual inference if Chrome DevTools unavailable
+- **Production-Ready** - OKLCH colors, WCAG AA compliance, semantic naming
+- **Agent-Driven** - Autonomous multi-file generation with ui-design-agent
 
-## Integration
 
-**Input**: Reference images or text prompts
-**Output**: `style-cards.json` for consolidation
-**Next**: `/workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {count}`
-
-**Note**: This command only extracts visual style (colors, typography, spacing). For layout structure extraction, use `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract`.

.claude/output-styles/agent-workflow-coordination.md

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
----
-name: Workflow Coordination
-description: Core coordination principles for multi-agent development workflows
----
-## Core Agent Coordination Principles
-
-### Planning First Principle
-
-**Purpose**: Thorough upfront planning reduces risk, improves quality, and prevents costly rework.
-
-
-### TodoWrite Coordination Rules
-
-1.  **TodoWrite FIRST**: Always create TodoWrite entries *before* complex task execution begins.
-2.  **Context Before Implementation**: Context gathering must complete before implementation tasks begin.
-3.  **Agent Coordination**: Each agent is responsible for updating the status of its assigned todo.
-4.  **Progress Visibility**: Provides clear workflow state visibility to stakeholders.
-
-6.  **Checkpoint Safety**: State is saved automatically after each agent completes its work.
-7.  **Interrupt/Resume**: The system must support full state preservation and restoration.
-

.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# Classify folders by type for documentation generation
+# Usage: get_modules_by_depth.sh | classify-folders.sh
+# Output: folder_path|folder_type|code:N|dirs:N
+
+while IFS='|' read -r depth_info path_info files_info types_info claude_info; do
+  # Extract folder path from format "path:./src/modules"
+  folder_path=$(echo "$path_info" | cut -d':' -f2-)
+
+  # Skip if path extraction failed
+  [[ -z "$folder_path" || ! -d "$folder_path" ]] && continue
+
+  # Count code files (maxdepth 1)
+  code_files=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type f \
+    \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" \
+       -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.rs" \
+       -o -name "*.c" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.cs" \) \
+    2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+
+  # Count subdirectories
+  subfolders=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type d \
+    -not -path "$folder_path" 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+
+  # Determine folder type
+  if [[ $code_files -gt 0 ]]; then
+    folder_type="code"  # API.md + README.md
+  elif [[ $subfolders -gt 0 ]]; then
+    folder_type="navigation"  # README.md only
+  else
+    folder_type="skip"  # Empty or no relevant content
+  fi
+
+  # Output classification result
+  echo "${folder_path}|${folder_type}|code:${code_files}|dirs:${subfolders}"
+done

.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh

@@ -2,32 +2,88 @@
 # Detect modules affected by git changes or recent modifications
 # Usage: detect_changed_modules.sh [format]
 #   format: list|grouped|paths (default: paths)
+#
+# Features:
+# - Respects .gitignore patterns (current directory or git root)
+# - Detects git changes (staged, unstaged, or last commit)
+# - Falls back to recently modified files (last 24 hours)
+
+# Build exclusion filters from .gitignore
+build_exclusion_filters() {
+    local filters=""
+
+    # Common system/cache directories to exclude
+    local system_excludes=(
+        ".git" "__pycache__" "node_modules" ".venv" "venv" "env"
+        "dist" "build" ".cache" ".pytest_cache" ".mypy_cache"
+        "coverage" ".nyc_output" "logs" "tmp" "temp"
+    )
+
+    for exclude in "${system_excludes[@]}"; do
+        filters+=" -not -path '*/$exclude' -not -path '*/$exclude/*'"
+    done
+
+    # Find and parse .gitignore (current dir first, then git root)
+    local gitignore_file=""
+
+    # Check current directory first
+    if [ -f ".gitignore" ]; then
+        gitignore_file=".gitignore"
+    else
+        # Try to find git root and check for .gitignore there
+        local git_root=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)
+        if [ -n "$git_root" ] && [ -f "$git_root/.gitignore" ]; then
+            gitignore_file="$git_root/.gitignore"
+        fi
+    fi
+
+    # Parse .gitignore if found
+    if [ -n "$gitignore_file" ]; then
+        while IFS= read -r line; do
+            # Skip empty lines and comments
+            [[ -z "$line" || "$line" =~ ^[[:space:]]*# ]] && continue
+
+            # Remove trailing slash and whitespace
+            line=$(echo "$line" | sed 's|/$||' | xargs)
+
+            # Skip wildcards patterns (too complex for simple find)
+            [[ "$line" =~ \* ]] && continue
+
+            # Add to filters
+            filters+=" -not -path '*/$line' -not -path '*/$line/*'"
+        done < "$gitignore_file"
+    fi
+
+    echo "$filters"
+}
 
 detect_changed_modules() {
     local format="${1:-paths}"
     local changed_files=""
     local affected_dirs=""
-    
+    local exclusion_filters=$(build_exclusion_filters)
+
     # Step 1: Try to get git changes (staged + unstaged)
     if git rev-parse --git-dir > /dev/null 2>&1; then
         changed_files=$(git diff --name-only HEAD 2>/dev/null; git diff --name-only --cached 2>/dev/null)
-        
+
         # If no changes in working directory, check last commit
         if [ -z "$changed_files" ]; then
             changed_files=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD 2>/dev/null)
         fi
     fi
-    
+
     # Step 2: If no git changes, find recently modified source files (last 24 hours)
+    # Apply exclusion filters from .gitignore
     if [ -z "$changed_files" ]; then
-        changed_files=$(find . -type f \( \
-            -name "*.md" -o \
-            -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.tsx" -o \
-            -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" -o \
-            -name "*.java" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.c" -o -name "*.h" -o \
-            -name "*.sh" -o -name "*.ps1" -o \
-            -name "*.json" -o -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" \
-        \) -not -path '*/.*' -mtime -1 2>/dev/null)
+        changed_files=$(eval "find . -type f \( \
+            -name '*.md' -o \
+            -name '*.js' -o -name '*.ts' -o -name '*.jsx' -o -name '*.tsx' -o \
+            -name '*.py' -o -name '*.go' -o -name '*.rs' -o \
+            -name '*.java' -o -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.c' -o -name '*.h' -o \
+            -name '*.sh' -o -name '*.ps1' -o \
+            -name '*.json' -o -name '*.yaml' -o -name '*.yml' \
+        \) $exclusion_filters -mtime -1 2>/dev/null")
     fi
     
     # Step 3: Extract unique parent directories

.claude/scripts/discover-design-files.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# discover-design-files.sh - Discover design-related files and output JSON
+# Usage: discover-design-files.sh <source_dir> <output_json>
+
+set -euo pipefail
+
+source_dir="${1:-.}"
+output_json="${2:-discovered-files.json}"
+
+# Function to find and format files as JSON array
+find_files() {
+  local pattern="$1"
+  local files
+  files=$(eval "find \"$source_dir\" -type f $pattern \
+    ! -path \"*/node_modules/*\" \
+    ! -path \"*/dist/*\" \
+    ! -path \"*/.git/*\" \
+    ! -path \"*/build/*\" \
+    ! -path \"*/coverage/*\" \
+    2>/dev/null | sort || true")
+
+  local count
+  if [ -z "$files" ]; then
+    count=0
+  else
+    count=$(echo "$files" | grep -c . || echo 0)
+  fi
+  local json_files=""
+
+  if [ "$count" -gt 0 ]; then
+    json_files=$(echo "$files" | awk '{printf "\"%s\"%s\n", $0, (NR<'$count'?",":"")}' | tr '\n' ' ')
+  fi
+
+  echo "$count|$json_files"
+}
+
+# Discover CSS/SCSS files
+css_result=$(find_files '\( -name "*.css" -o -name "*.scss" \)')
+css_count=${css_result%%|*}
+css_files=${css_result#*|}
+
+# Discover JS/TS files (all framework files)
+js_result=$(find_files '\( -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.mjs" -o -name "*.cjs" -o -name "*.vue" -o -name "*.svelte" \)')
+js_count=${js_result%%|*}
+js_files=${js_result#*|}
+
+# Discover HTML files
+html_result=$(find_files '-name "*.html"')
+html_count=${html_result%%|*}
+html_files=${html_result#*|}
+
+# Calculate total
+total_count=$((css_count + js_count + html_count))
+
+# Generate JSON
+cat > "$output_json" << EOF
+{
+  "discovery_time": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)",
+  "source_directory": "$(cd "$source_dir" && pwd)",
+  "file_types": {
+    "css": {
+      "count": $css_count,
+      "files": [${css_files}]
+    },
+    "js": {
+      "count": $js_count,
+      "files": [${js_files}]
+    },
+    "html": {
+      "count": $html_count,
+      "files": [${html_files}]
+    }
+  },
+  "total_files": $total_count
+}
+EOF
+
+# Ensure file is fully written and synchronized to disk
+# This prevents race conditions when the file is immediately read by another process
+sync "$output_json" 2>/dev/null || sync  # Sync specific file, fallback to full sync
+sleep 0.1  # Additional safety: 100ms delay for filesystem metadata update
+
+echo "Discovered: CSS=$css_count, JS=$js_count, HTML=$html_count (Total: $total_count)" >&2

.claude/scripts/extract-animations.js

@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+/**
+ * Animation & Transition Extraction Script
+ *
+ * Extracts CSS animations, transitions, and transform patterns from a live web page.
+ * This script runs in the browser context via Chrome DevTools Protocol.
+ *
+ * @returns {Object} Structured animation data
+ */
+(() => {
+  const extractionTimestamp = new Date().toISOString();
+  const currentUrl = window.location.href;
+
+  /**
+   * Parse transition shorthand or individual properties
+   */
+  function parseTransition(element, computedStyle) {
+    const transition = computedStyle.transition || computedStyle.webkitTransition;
+
+    if (!transition || transition === 'none' || transition === 'all 0s ease 0s') {
+      return null;
+    }
+
+    // Parse shorthand: "property duration easing delay"
+    const transitions = [];
+    const parts = transition.split(/,\s*/);
+
+    parts.forEach(part => {
+      const match = part.match(/^(\S+)\s+([\d.]+m?s)\s+(\S+)(?:\s+([\d.]+m?s))?/);
+      if (match) {
+        transitions.push({
+          property: match[1],
+          duration: match[2],
+          easing: match[3],
+          delay: match[4] || '0s'
+        });
+      }
+    });
+
+    return transitions.length > 0 ? transitions : null;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Extract animation name and properties
+   */
+  function parseAnimation(element, computedStyle) {
+    const animationName = computedStyle.animationName || computedStyle.webkitAnimationName;
+
+    if (!animationName || animationName === 'none') {
+      return null;
+    }
+
+    return {
+      name: animationName,
+      duration: computedStyle.animationDuration || computedStyle.webkitAnimationDuration,
+      easing: computedStyle.animationTimingFunction || computedStyle.webkitAnimationTimingFunction,
+      delay: computedStyle.animationDelay || computedStyle.webkitAnimationDelay || '0s',
+      iterationCount: computedStyle.animationIterationCount || computedStyle.webkitAnimationIterationCount || '1',
+      direction: computedStyle.animationDirection || computedStyle.webkitAnimationDirection || 'normal',
+      fillMode: computedStyle.animationFillMode || computedStyle.webkitAnimationFillMode || 'none'
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Extract transform value
+   */
+  function parseTransform(computedStyle) {
+    const transform = computedStyle.transform || computedStyle.webkitTransform;
+
+    if (!transform || transform === 'none') {
+      return null;
+    }
+
+    return transform;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Get element selector (simplified for readability)
+   */
+  function getSelector(element) {
+    if (element.id) {
+      return `#${element.id}`;
+    }
+
+    if (element.className && typeof element.className === 'string') {
+      const classes = element.className.trim().split(/\s+/).slice(0, 2).join('.');
+      if (classes) {
+        return `.${classes}`;
+      }
+    }
+
+    return element.tagName.toLowerCase();
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Extract all stylesheets and find @keyframes rules
+   */
+  function extractKeyframes() {
+    const keyframes = {};
+
+    try {
+      // Iterate through all stylesheets
+      Array.from(document.styleSheets).forEach(sheet => {
+        try {
+          // Skip external stylesheets due to CORS
+          if (sheet.href && !sheet.href.startsWith(window.location.origin)) {
+            return;
+          }
+
+          Array.from(sheet.cssRules || sheet.rules || []).forEach(rule => {
+            // Check for @keyframes rules
+            if (rule.type === CSSRule.KEYFRAMES_RULE || rule.type === CSSRule.WEBKIT_KEYFRAMES_RULE) {
+              const name = rule.name;
+              const frames = {};
+
+              Array.from(rule.cssRules || []).forEach(keyframe => {
+                const key = keyframe.keyText; // e.g., "0%", "50%", "100%"
+                frames[key] = keyframe.style.cssText;
+              });
+
+              keyframes[name] = frames;
+            }
+          });
+        } catch (e) {
+          // Skip stylesheets that can't be accessed (CORS)
+          console.warn('Cannot access stylesheet:', sheet.href, e.message);
+        }
+      });
+    } catch (e) {
+      console.error('Error extracting keyframes:', e);
+    }
+
+    return keyframes;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Scan visible elements for animations and transitions
+   */
+  function scanElements() {
+    const elements = document.querySelectorAll('*');
+    const transitionData = [];
+    const animationData = [];
+    const transformData = [];
+
+    const uniqueTransitions = new Set();
+    const uniqueAnimations = new Set();
+    const uniqueEasings = new Set();
+    const uniqueDurations = new Set();
+
+    elements.forEach(element => {
+      // Skip invisible elements
+      const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect();
+      if (rect.width === 0 && rect.height === 0) {
+        return;
+      }
+
+      const computedStyle = window.getComputedStyle(element);
+
+      // Extract transitions
+      const transitions = parseTransition(element, computedStyle);
+      if (transitions) {
+        const selector = getSelector(element);
+        transitions.forEach(t => {
+          const key = `${t.property}-${t.duration}-${t.easing}`;
+          if (!uniqueTransitions.has(key)) {
+            uniqueTransitions.add(key);
+            transitionData.push({
+              selector,
+              ...t
+            });
+            uniqueEasings.add(t.easing);
+            uniqueDurations.add(t.duration);
+          }
+        });
+      }
+
+      // Extract animations
+      const animation = parseAnimation(element, computedStyle);
+      if (animation) {
+        const selector = getSelector(element);
+        const key = `${animation.name}-${animation.duration}`;
+        if (!uniqueAnimations.has(key)) {
+          uniqueAnimations.add(key);
+          animationData.push({
+            selector,
+            ...animation
+          });
+          uniqueEasings.add(animation.easing);
+          uniqueDurations.add(animation.duration);
+        }
+      }
+
+      // Extract transforms (on hover/active, we only get current state)
+      const transform = parseTransform(computedStyle);
+      if (transform) {
+        const selector = getSelector(element);
+        transformData.push({
+          selector,
+          transform
+        });
+      }
+    });
+
+    return {
+      transitions: transitionData,
+      animations: animationData,
+      transforms: transformData,
+      uniqueEasings: Array.from(uniqueEasings),
+      uniqueDurations: Array.from(uniqueDurations)
+    };
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Main extraction function
+   */
+  function extractAnimations() {
+    const elementData = scanElements();
+    const keyframes = extractKeyframes();
+
+    return {
+      metadata: {
+        timestamp: extractionTimestamp,
+        url: currentUrl,
+        method: 'chrome-devtools',
+        version: '1.0.0'
+      },
+      transitions: elementData.transitions,
+      animations: elementData.animations,
+      transforms: elementData.transforms,
+      keyframes: keyframes,
+      summary: {
+        total_transitions: elementData.transitions.length,
+        total_animations: elementData.animations.length,
+        total_transforms: elementData.transforms.length,
+        total_keyframes: Object.keys(keyframes).length,
+        unique_easings: elementData.uniqueEasings,
+        unique_durations: elementData.uniqueDurations
+      }
+    };
+  }
+
+  // Execute extraction
+  return extractAnimations();
+})();

.claude/scripts/extract-computed-styles.js

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/**
+ * Extract Computed Styles from DOM
+ *
+ * This script extracts real CSS computed styles from a webpage's DOM
+ * to provide accurate design tokens for UI replication.
+ *
+ * Usage: Execute this function via Chrome DevTools evaluate_script
+ */
+
+(() => {
+  /**
+   * Extract unique values from a set and sort them
+   */
+  const uniqueSorted = (set) => {
+    return Array.from(set)
+      .filter(v => v && v !== 'none' && v !== '0px' && v !== 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)')
+      .sort();
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Parse rgb/rgba to OKLCH format (placeholder - returns original for now)
+   */
+  const toOKLCH = (color) => {
+    // TODO: Implement actual RGB to OKLCH conversion
+    // For now, return the original color with a note
+    return `${color} /* TODO: Convert to OKLCH */`;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Extract only key styles from an element
+   */
+  const extractKeyStyles = (element) => {
+    const s = window.getComputedStyle(element);
+    return {
+      color: s.color,
+      bg: s.backgroundColor,
+      borderRadius: s.borderRadius,
+      boxShadow: s.boxShadow,
+      fontSize: s.fontSize,
+      fontWeight: s.fontWeight,
+      padding: s.padding,
+      margin: s.margin
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Main extraction function - extract all critical design tokens
+   */
+  const extractDesignTokens = () => {
+    // Include all key UI elements
+    const selectors = [
+      'button', '.btn', '[role="button"]',
+      'input', 'textarea', 'select',
+      'h1', 'h2', 'h3', 'h4', 'h5', 'h6',
+      '.card', 'article', 'section',
+      'a', 'p', 'nav', 'header', 'footer'
+    ];
+
+    // Collect all design tokens
+    const tokens = {
+      colors: new Set(),
+      borderRadii: new Set(),
+      shadows: new Set(),
+      fontSizes: new Set(),
+      fontWeights: new Set(),
+      spacing: new Set()
+    };
+
+    // Extract from all elements
+    selectors.forEach(selector => {
+      try {
+        const elements = document.querySelectorAll(selector);
+        elements.forEach(element => {
+          const s = extractKeyStyles(element);
+
+          // Collect all tokens (no limits)
+          if (s.color && s.color !== 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)') tokens.colors.add(s.color);
+          if (s.bg && s.bg !== 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)') tokens.colors.add(s.bg);
+          if (s.borderRadius && s.borderRadius !== '0px') tokens.borderRadii.add(s.borderRadius);
+          if (s.boxShadow && s.boxShadow !== 'none') tokens.shadows.add(s.boxShadow);
+          if (s.fontSize) tokens.fontSizes.add(s.fontSize);
+          if (s.fontWeight) tokens.fontWeights.add(s.fontWeight);
+
+          // Extract all spacing values
+          [s.padding, s.margin].forEach(val => {
+            if (val && val !== '0px') {
+              val.split(' ').forEach(v => {
+                if (v && v !== '0px') tokens.spacing.add(v);
+              });
+            }
+          });
+        });
+      } catch (e) {
+        console.warn(`Error: ${selector}`, e);
+      }
+    });
+
+    // Return all tokens (no element details to save context)
+    return {
+      metadata: {
+        extractedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
+        url: window.location.href,
+        method: 'computed-styles'
+      },
+      tokens: {
+        colors: uniqueSorted(tokens.colors),
+        borderRadii: uniqueSorted(tokens.borderRadii),  // ALL radius values
+        shadows: uniqueSorted(tokens.shadows),          // ALL shadows
+        fontSizes: uniqueSorted(tokens.fontSizes),
+        fontWeights: uniqueSorted(tokens.fontWeights),
+        spacing: uniqueSorted(tokens.spacing)
+      }
+    };
+  };
+
+  // Execute and return results
+  return extractDesignTokens();
+})();

.claude/scripts/extract-layout-structure.js

@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/**
+ * Extract Layout Structure from DOM - Enhanced Version
+ *
+ * Extracts real layout information from DOM to provide accurate
+ * structural data for UI replication.
+ *
+ * Features:
+ * - Framework detection (Nuxt.js, Next.js, React, Vue, Angular)
+ * - Multi-strategy container detection (strict → relaxed → class-based → framework-specific)
+ * - Intelligent main content detection with common class names support
+ * - Supports modern SPA frameworks
+ * - Detects non-semantic main containers (.main, .content, etc.)
+ * - Progressive exploration: Auto-discovers missing selectors when standard patterns fail
+ * - Suggests new class names to add to script based on actual page structure
+ *
+ * Progressive Exploration:
+ * When fewer than 3 main containers are found, the script automatically:
+ * 1. Analyzes all large visible containers (≥500×300px)
+ * 2. Extracts class name patterns (main/content/wrapper/container/page/etc.)
+ * 3. Suggests new selectors to add to the script
+ * 4. Returns exploration data in result.exploration
+ *
+ * Usage: Execute via Chrome DevTools evaluate_script
+ * Version: 2.2.0
+ */
+
+(() => {
+  /**
+   * Get element's bounding box relative to viewport
+   */
+  const getBounds = (element) => {
+    const rect = element.getBoundingClientRect();
+    return {
+      x: Math.round(rect.x),
+      y: Math.round(rect.y),
+      width: Math.round(rect.width),
+      height: Math.round(rect.height)
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Extract layout properties from an element
+   */
+  const extractLayoutProps = (element) => {
+    const s = window.getComputedStyle(element);
+
+    return {
+      // Core layout
+      display: s.display,
+      position: s.position,
+
+      // Flexbox
+      flexDirection: s.flexDirection,
+      justifyContent: s.justifyContent,
+      alignItems: s.alignItems,
+      flexWrap: s.flexWrap,
+      gap: s.gap,
+
+      // Grid
+      gridTemplateColumns: s.gridTemplateColumns,
+      gridTemplateRows: s.gridTemplateRows,
+      gridAutoFlow: s.gridAutoFlow,
+
+      // Dimensions
+      width: s.width,
+      height: s.height,
+      maxWidth: s.maxWidth,
+      minWidth: s.minWidth,
+
+      // Spacing
+      padding: s.padding,
+      margin: s.margin
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Identify layout pattern for an element
+   */
+  const identifyPattern = (props) => {
+    const { display, flexDirection, gridTemplateColumns } = props;
+
+    if (display === 'flex' || display === 'inline-flex') {
+      if (flexDirection === 'column') return 'flex-column';
+      if (flexDirection === 'row') return 'flex-row';
+      return 'flex';
+    }
+
+    if (display === 'grid') {
+      const cols = gridTemplateColumns;
+      if (cols && cols !== 'none') {
+        const colCount = cols.split(' ').length;
+        return `grid-${colCount}col`;
+      }
+      return 'grid';
+    }
+
+    if (display === 'block') return 'block';
+
+    return display;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Detect frontend framework
+   */
+  const detectFramework = () => {
+    if (document.querySelector('#__nuxt')) return { name: 'Nuxt.js', version: 'unknown' };
+    if (document.querySelector('#__next')) return { name: 'Next.js', version: 'unknown' };
+    if (document.querySelector('[data-reactroot]')) return { name: 'React', version: 'unknown' };
+    if (document.querySelector('[ng-version]')) return { name: 'Angular', version: 'unknown' };
+    if (window.Vue) return { name: 'Vue.js', version: window.Vue.version || 'unknown' };
+    return { name: 'Unknown', version: 'unknown' };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Build layout tree recursively
+   */
+  const buildLayoutTree = (element, depth = 0, maxDepth = 3) => {
+    if (depth > maxDepth) return null;
+
+    const props = extractLayoutProps(element);
+    const bounds = getBounds(element);
+    const pattern = identifyPattern(props);
+
+    // Get semantic role
+    const tagName = element.tagName.toLowerCase();
+    const classes = Array.from(element.classList).slice(0, 3); // Max 3 classes
+    const role = element.getAttribute('role');
+
+    // Build node
+    const node = {
+      tag: tagName,
+      classes: classes,
+      role: role,
+      pattern: pattern,
+      bounds: bounds,
+      layout: {
+        display: props.display,
+        position: props.position
+      }
+    };
+
+    // Add flex/grid specific properties
+    if (props.display === 'flex' || props.display === 'inline-flex') {
+      node.layout.flexDirection = props.flexDirection;
+      node.layout.justifyContent = props.justifyContent;
+      node.layout.alignItems = props.alignItems;
+      node.layout.gap = props.gap;
+    }
+
+    if (props.display === 'grid') {
+      node.layout.gridTemplateColumns = props.gridTemplateColumns;
+      node.layout.gridTemplateRows = props.gridTemplateRows;
+      node.layout.gap = props.gap;
+    }
+
+    // Process children for container elements
+    if (props.display === 'flex' || props.display === 'grid' || props.display === 'block') {
+      const children = Array.from(element.children);
+      if (children.length > 0 && children.length < 50) { // Limit to 50 children
+        node.children = children
+          .map(child => buildLayoutTree(child, depth + 1, maxDepth))
+          .filter(child => child !== null);
+      }
+    }
+
+    return node;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Find main layout containers with multi-strategy approach
+   */
+  const findMainContainers = () => {
+    const containers = [];
+    const found = new Set();
+
+    // Strategy 1: Strict selectors (body direct children)
+    const strictSelectors = [
+      'body > header',
+      'body > nav',
+      'body > main',
+      'body > footer'
+    ];
+
+    // Strategy 2: Relaxed selectors (any level)
+    const relaxedSelectors = [
+      'header',
+      'nav',
+      'main',
+      'footer',
+      '[role="banner"]',
+      '[role="navigation"]',
+      '[role="main"]',
+      '[role="contentinfo"]'
+    ];
+
+    // Strategy 3: Common class-based main content selectors
+    const commonClassSelectors = [
+      '.main',
+      '.content',
+      '.main-content',
+      '.page-content',
+      '.container.main',
+      '.wrapper > .main',
+      'div[class*="main-wrapper"]',
+      'div[class*="content-wrapper"]'
+    ];
+
+    // Strategy 4: Framework-specific selectors
+    const frameworkSelectors = [
+      '#__nuxt header', '#__nuxt .main', '#__nuxt main', '#__nuxt footer',
+      '#__next header', '#__next .main', '#__next main', '#__next footer',
+      '#app header', '#app .main', '#app main', '#app footer',
+      '[data-app] header', '[data-app] .main', '[data-app] main', '[data-app] footer'
+    ];
+
+    // Try all strategies
+    const allSelectors = [...strictSelectors, ...relaxedSelectors, ...commonClassSelectors, ...frameworkSelectors];
+
+    allSelectors.forEach(selector => {
+      try {
+        const elements = document.querySelectorAll(selector);
+        elements.forEach(element => {
+          // Avoid duplicates and invisible elements
+          if (!found.has(element) && element.offsetParent !== null) {
+            found.add(element);
+            const tree = buildLayoutTree(element, 0, 3);
+            if (tree && tree.bounds.width > 0 && tree.bounds.height > 0) {
+              containers.push(tree);
+            }
+          }
+        });
+      } catch (e) {
+        console.warn(`Selector failed: ${selector}`, e);
+      }
+    });
+
+    // Fallback: If no containers found, use body's direct children
+    if (containers.length === 0) {
+      Array.from(document.body.children).forEach(child => {
+        if (child.offsetParent !== null && !found.has(child)) {
+          const tree = buildLayoutTree(child, 0, 2);
+          if (tree && tree.bounds.width > 100 && tree.bounds.height > 100) {
+            containers.push(tree);
+          }
+        }
+      });
+    }
+
+    return containers;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Progressive exploration: Discover main containers when standard selectors fail
+   * Analyzes large visible containers and suggests class name patterns
+   */
+  const exploreMainContainers = () => {
+    const candidates = [];
+    const minWidth = 500;
+    const minHeight = 300;
+
+    // Find all large visible divs
+    const allDivs = document.querySelectorAll('div');
+    allDivs.forEach(div => {
+      const rect = div.getBoundingClientRect();
+      const style = window.getComputedStyle(div);
+
+      // Filter: large size, visible, not header/footer
+      if (rect.width >= minWidth &&
+          rect.height >= minHeight &&
+          div.offsetParent !== null &&
+          !div.closest('header') &&
+          !div.closest('footer')) {
+
+        const classes = Array.from(div.classList);
+        const area = rect.width * rect.height;
+
+        candidates.push({
+          element: div,
+          classes: classes,
+          area: area,
+          bounds: {
+            width: Math.round(rect.width),
+            height: Math.round(rect.height)
+          },
+          display: style.display,
+          depth: getElementDepth(div)
+        });
+      }
+    });
+
+    // Sort by area (largest first) and take top candidates
+    candidates.sort((a, b) => b.area - a.area);
+
+    // Extract unique class patterns from top candidates
+    const classPatterns = new Set();
+    candidates.slice(0, 20).forEach(c => {
+      c.classes.forEach(cls => {
+        // Identify potential main content class patterns
+        if (cls.match(/main|content|container|wrapper|page|body|layout|app/i)) {
+          classPatterns.add(cls);
+        }
+      });
+    });
+
+    return {
+      candidates: candidates.slice(0, 10).map(c => ({
+        classes: c.classes,
+        bounds: c.bounds,
+        display: c.display,
+        depth: c.depth
+      })),
+      suggestedSelectors: Array.from(classPatterns).map(cls => `.${cls}`)
+    };
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Get element depth in DOM tree
+   */
+  const getElementDepth = (element) => {
+    let depth = 0;
+    let current = element;
+    while (current.parentElement) {
+      depth++;
+      current = current.parentElement;
+    }
+    return depth;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Analyze layout patterns
+   */
+  const analyzePatterns = (containers) => {
+    const patterns = {
+      flexColumn: 0,
+      flexRow: 0,
+      grid: 0,
+      sticky: 0,
+      fixed: 0
+    };
+
+    const analyze = (node) => {
+      if (!node) return;
+
+      if (node.pattern === 'flex-column') patterns.flexColumn++;
+      if (node.pattern === 'flex-row') patterns.flexRow++;
+      if (node.pattern && node.pattern.startsWith('grid')) patterns.grid++;
+      if (node.layout.position === 'sticky') patterns.sticky++;
+      if (node.layout.position === 'fixed') patterns.fixed++;
+
+      if (node.children) {
+        node.children.forEach(analyze);
+      }
+    };
+
+    containers.forEach(analyze);
+    return patterns;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Main extraction function with progressive exploration
+   */
+  const extractLayout = () => {
+    const framework = detectFramework();
+    const containers = findMainContainers();
+    const patterns = analyzePatterns(containers);
+
+    // Progressive exploration: if too few containers found, explore and suggest
+    let exploration = null;
+    const minExpectedContainers = 3; // At least header, main, footer
+
+    if (containers.length < minExpectedContainers) {
+      exploration = exploreMainContainers();
+
+      // Add warning message
+      exploration.warning = `Only ${containers.length} containers found. Consider adding these selectors to the script:`;
+      exploration.recommendation = exploration.suggestedSelectors.join(', ');
+    }
+
+    const result = {
+      metadata: {
+        extractedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
+        url: window.location.href,
+        framework: framework,
+        method: 'layout-structure-enhanced',
+        version: '2.2.0'
+      },
+      statistics: {
+        totalContainers: containers.length,
+        patterns: patterns
+      },
+      structure: containers
+    };
+
+    // Add exploration results if triggered
+    if (exploration) {
+      result.exploration = {
+        triggered: true,
+        reason: 'Insufficient containers found with standard selectors',
+        discoveredCandidates: exploration.candidates,
+        suggestedSelectors: exploration.suggestedSelectors,
+        warning: exploration.warning,
+        recommendation: exploration.recommendation
+      };
+    }
+
+    return result;
+  };
+
+  // Execute and return results
+  return extractLayout();
+})();