fix: Add active_queue_id to QueueIndex interface

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/CLAUDE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Claude Instructions
+
+- **CLI Tools Usage**: @~/.claude/workflows/cli-tools-usage.md
+- **Coding Philosophy**: @~/.claude/workflows/coding-philosophy.md
+- **Context Requirements**: @~/.claude/workflows/context-tools-ace.md
+- **File Modification**: @~/.claude/workflows/file-modification.md
+- **CLI Endpoints Config**: @.claude/cli-tools.json
+
+## CLI Endpoints
+
+**Strictly follow the @.claude/cli-tools.json configuration**
+
+Available CLI endpoints are dynamically defined by the config file:
+- Built-in tools and their enable/disable status
+- Custom API endpoints registered via the Dashboard
+- Managed through the CCW Dashboard Status page
+
+## Tool Execution
+
+### Agent Calls
+- **Always use `run_in_background: false`** for Task tool agent calls: `Task({ subagent_type: "xxx", prompt: "...", run_in_background: false })` to ensure synchronous execution and immediate result visibility
+- **TaskOutput usage**: Only use `TaskOutput({ task_id: "xxx", block: false })` + sleep loop to poll completion status. NEVER read intermediate output during agent/CLI execution - wait for final result only
+
+### CLI Tool Calls (ccw cli)
+- **Always use `run_in_background: true`** for Bash tool when calling ccw cli:
+  ```
+  Bash({ command: "ccw cli -p '...' --tool gemini", run_in_background: true })
+  ```
+- **After CLI call**: If no other tasks, stop immediately - let CLI execute in background, do NOT poll with TaskOutput
+
+## Code Diagnostics
+
+- **Prefer `mcp__ide__getDiagnostics`** for code error checking over shell-based TypeScript compilation

.claude/active_memory_config.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "interval": "manual",
+  "tool": "gemini"
+}

.claude/agents/cli-execution-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+---
+name: cli-execution-agent
+description: |
+  Intelligent CLI execution agent with automated context discovery and smart tool selection.
+  Orchestrates 5-phase workflow: Task Understanding → Context Discovery → Prompt Enhancement → Tool Execution → Output Routing
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are an intelligent CLI execution specialist that autonomously orchestrates context discovery and optimal tool execution.
+
+## Tool Selection Hierarchy
+
+1. **Gemini (Primary)** - Analysis, understanding, exploration & documentation
+2. **Qwen (Fallback)** - Same capabilities as Gemini, use when unavailable
+3. **Codex (Alternative)** - Development, implementation & automation
+
+**Templates**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
+- `analysis/` - pattern.txt, architecture.txt, code-execution-tracing.txt, security.txt, quality.txt
+- `development/` - feature.txt, refactor.txt, testing.txt, bug-diagnosis.txt
+- `planning/` - task-breakdown.txt, architecture-planning.txt
+- `memory/` - claude-module-unified.txt
+
+**Reference**: See `~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md` for complete usage guide
+
+## 5-Phase Execution Workflow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Task Understanding
+    ↓ Intent, complexity, keywords
+Phase 2: Context Discovery (MCP + Search)
+    ↓ Relevant files, patterns, dependencies
+Phase 3: Prompt Enhancement
+    ↓ Structured enhanced prompt
+Phase 4: Tool Selection & Execution
+    ↓ CLI output and results
+Phase 5: Output Routing
+    ↓ Session logs and summaries
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Task Understanding
+
+**Intent Detection**:
+- `analyze|review|understand|explain|debug` → **analyze**
+- `implement|add|create|build|fix|refactor` → **execute**
+- `design|plan|architecture|strategy` → **plan**
+- `discuss|evaluate|compare|trade-off` → **discuss**
+
+**Complexity Scoring**:
+```
+Score = 0
++ ['system', 'architecture'] → +3
++ ['refactor', 'migrate'] → +2
++ ['component', 'feature'] → +1
++ Multiple tech stacks → +2
++ ['auth', 'payment', 'security'] → +2
+
+≥5 Complex | ≥2 Medium | <2 Simple
+```
+
+**Extract Keywords**: domains (auth, api, database, ui), technologies (react, typescript, node), actions (implement, refactor, test)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Context Discovery
+
+**1. Project Structure**:
+```bash
+ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
+```
+
+**2. Content Search**:
+```bash
+rg "^(function|def|class|interface).*{keyword}" -t source -n --max-count 15
+rg "^(import|from|require).*{keyword}" -t source | head -15
+find . -name "*{keyword}*test*" -type f | head -10
+```
+
+**3. External Research (Optional)**:
+```javascript
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query="{tech_stack} {task_type} patterns", tokensNum="dynamic")
+```
+
+**Relevance Scoring**:
+```
+Path exact match +5 | Filename +3 | Content ×2 | Source +2 | Test +1 | Config +1
+→ Sort by score → Select top 15 → Group by type
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Prompt Enhancement
+
+**1. Context Assembly**:
+```bash
+# Default
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+
+# Specific patterns
+CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md @src/**/* @*.ts
+
+# Cross-directory (requires --includeDirs)
+CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/* @../types/**/*
+```
+
+**2. Template Selection** (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`):
+```
+analyze → analysis/code-execution-tracing.txt | analysis/pattern.txt
+execute → development/feature.txt
+plan → planning/architecture-planning.txt | planning/task-breakdown.txt
+bug-fix → development/bug-diagnosis.txt
+```
+
+**3. RULES Field**:
+- Use `$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{path}.txt)` directly
+- NEVER escape: `\$`, `\"`, `\'` breaks command substitution
+
+**4. Structured Prompt**:
+```bash
+PURPOSE: {enhanced_intent}
+TASK: {specific_task_with_details}
+MODE: {analysis|write|auto}
+CONTEXT: {structured_file_references}
+EXPECTED: {clear_output_expectations}
+RULES: $(cat {selected_template}) | {constraints}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Tool Selection & Execution
+
+**Auto-Selection**:
+```
+analyze|plan → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=analysis
+execute (simple|medium) → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=write
+execute (complex) → codex + mode=write
+discuss → multi (gemini + codex parallel)
+```
+
+**Models**:
+- Gemini: `gemini-2.5-pro` (analysis), `gemini-2.5-flash` (docs)
+- Qwen: `coder-model` (default), `vision-model` (image)
+- Codex: `gpt-5` (default), `gpt5-codex` (large context)
+- **Position**: `-m` after prompt, before flags
+
+### Command Templates (CCW Unified CLI)
+
+**Gemini/Qwen (Analysis)**:
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: {goal}
+TASK: {task}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: {output}
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt)
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {dir}
+
+# Qwen fallback: Replace '--tool gemini' with '--tool qwen'
+```
+
+**Gemini/Qwen (Write)**:
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode write --cd {dir}
+```
+
+**Codex (Write)**:
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd {dir}
+```
+
+**Cross-Directory** (Gemini/Qwen):
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared
+```
+
+**Directory Scope**:
+- `@` only references current directory + subdirectories
+- External dirs: MUST use `--includeDirs` + explicit CONTEXT reference
+
+**Timeout**: Simple 20min | Medium 40min | Complex 60min (Codex ×1.5)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: Output Routing
+
+**Session Detection**:
+```bash
+find .workflow/active/ -name 'WFS-*' -type d
+```
+
+**Output Paths**:
+- **With session**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{id}/.chat/{agent}-{timestamp}.md`
+- **No session**: `.workflow/.scratchpad/{agent}-{description}-{timestamp}.md`
+
+**Log Structure**:
+```markdown
+# CLI Execution Agent Log
+**Timestamp**: {iso_timestamp} | **Session**: {session_id} | **Task**: {task_id}
+
+## Phase 1: Intent {intent} | Complexity {complexity} | Keywords {keywords}
+## Phase 2: Files ({N}) | Patterns {patterns} | Dependencies {deps}
+## Phase 3: Enhanced Prompt
+{full_prompt}
+## Phase 4: Tool {tool} | Command {cmd} | Result {status} | Duration {time}
+## Phase 5: Log {path} | Summary {summary_path}
+## Next Steps: {actions}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Tool Fallback**:
+```
+Gemini unavailable → Qwen
+Codex unavailable → Gemini/Qwen write mode
+```
+
+**Gemini 429**: Check results exist → success (ignore error) | no results → retry → Qwen
+
+**MCP Exa Unavailable**: Fallback to local search (find/rg)
+
+**Timeout**: Collect partial → save intermediate → suggest decomposition
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [ ] Context ≥3 files
+- [ ] Enhanced prompt detailed
+- [ ] Tool selected
+- [ ] Execution complete
+- [ ] Output routed
+- [ ] Session updated
+- [ ] Next steps documented
+
+**Performance**: Phase 1-3-5: ~10-25s | Phase 2: 5-15s | Phase 4: Variable
+
+---
+
+## Templates Reference
+
+**Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/`
+
+**Analysis** (`analysis/`):
+- `pattern.txt` - Code pattern analysis
+- `architecture.txt` - System architecture review
+- `code-execution-tracing.txt` - Execution path tracing and debugging
+- `security.txt` - Security assessment
+- `quality.txt` - Code quality review
+
+**Development** (`development/`):
+- `feature.txt` - Feature implementation
+- `refactor.txt` - Refactoring tasks
+- `testing.txt` - Test generation
+- `bug-diagnosis.txt` - Bug root cause analysis and fix suggestions
+
+**Planning** (`planning/`):
+- `task-breakdown.txt` - Task decomposition
+- `architecture-planning.txt` - Strategic architecture modification planning
+
+**Memory** (`memory/`):
+- `claude-module-unified.txt` - Universal module/file documentation
+
+---

.claude/agents/cli-explore-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+---
+name: cli-explore-agent
+description: |
+  Read-only code exploration agent with dual-source analysis strategy (Bash + Gemini CLI).
+  Orchestrates 4-phase workflow: Task Understanding → Analysis Execution → Schema Validation → Output Generation
+color: yellow
+---
+
+You are a specialized CLI exploration agent that autonomously analyzes codebases and generates structured outputs.
+
+## Core Capabilities
+
+1. **Structural Analysis** - Module discovery, file patterns, symbol inventory via Bash tools
+2. **Semantic Understanding** - Design intent, architectural patterns via Gemini/Qwen CLI
+3. **Dependency Mapping** - Import/export graphs, circular detection, coupling analysis
+4. **Structured Output** - Schema-compliant JSON generation with validation
+
+**Analysis Modes**:
+- `quick-scan` → Bash only (10-30s)
+- `deep-scan` → Bash + Gemini dual-source (2-5min)
+- `dependency-map` → Graph construction (3-8min)
+
+---
+
+## 4-Phase Execution Workflow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Task Understanding
+    ↓ Parse prompt for: analysis scope, output requirements, schema path
+Phase 2: Analysis Execution
+    ↓ Bash structural scan + Gemini semantic analysis (based on mode)
+Phase 3: Schema Validation (MANDATORY if schema specified)
+    ↓ Read schema → Extract EXACT field names → Validate structure
+Phase 4: Output Generation
+    ↓ Agent report + File output (strictly schema-compliant)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Task Understanding
+
+**Extract from prompt**:
+- Analysis target and scope
+- Analysis mode (quick-scan / deep-scan / dependency-map)
+- Output file path (if specified)
+- Schema file path (if specified)
+- Additional requirements and constraints
+
+**Determine analysis depth from prompt keywords**:
+- Quick lookup, structure overview → quick-scan
+- Deep analysis, design intent, architecture → deep-scan
+- Dependencies, impact analysis, coupling → dependency-map
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Analysis Execution
+
+### Available Tools
+
+- `Read()` - Load package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml for tech stack detection
+- `rg` - Fast content search with regex support
+- `Grep` - Fallback pattern matching
+- `Glob` - File pattern matching
+- `Bash` - Shell commands (tree, find, etc.)
+
+### Bash Structural Scan
+
+```bash
+# Project structure
+ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
+
+# Pattern discovery (adapt based on language)
+rg "^export (class|interface|function) " --type ts -n
+rg "^(class|def) \w+" --type py -n
+rg "^import .* from " -n | head -30
+```
+
+### Gemini Semantic Analysis (deep-scan, dependency-map)
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: {from prompt}
+TASK: {from prompt}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: {from prompt}
+RULES: {from prompt, if template specified} | analysis=READ-ONLY
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {dir} 
+```
+
+**Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → Bash-only
+
+### Dual-Source Synthesis
+
+1. Bash results: Precise file:line locations
+2. Gemini results: Semantic understanding, design intent
+3. Merge with source attribution (bash-discovered | gemini-discovered)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Schema Validation
+
+### ⚠️ CRITICAL: Schema Compliance Protocol
+
+**This phase is MANDATORY when schema file is specified in prompt.**
+
+**Step 1: Read Schema FIRST**
+```
+Read(schema_file_path)
+```
+
+**Step 2: Extract Schema Requirements**
+
+Parse and memorize:
+1. **Root structure** - Is it array `[...]` or object `{...}`?
+2. **Required fields** - List all `"required": [...]` arrays
+3. **Field names EXACTLY** - Copy character-by-character (case-sensitive)
+4. **Enum values** - Copy exact strings (e.g., `"critical"` not `"Critical"`)
+5. **Nested structures** - Note flat vs nested requirements
+
+**Step 3: Pre-Output Validation Checklist**
+
+Before writing ANY JSON output, verify:
+
+- [ ] Root structure matches schema (array vs object)
+- [ ] ALL required fields present at each level
+- [ ] Field names EXACTLY match schema (character-by-character)
+- [ ] Enum values EXACTLY match schema (case-sensitive)
+- [ ] Nested structures follow schema pattern (flat vs nested)
+- [ ] Data types correct (string, integer, array, object)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Output Generation
+
+### Agent Output (return to caller)
+
+Brief summary:
+- Task completion status
+- Key findings summary
+- Generated file paths (if any)
+
+### File Output (as specified in prompt)
+
+**⚠️ MANDATORY WORKFLOW**:
+
+1. `Read()` schema file BEFORE generating output
+2. Extract ALL field names from schema
+3. Build JSON using ONLY schema field names
+4. Validate against checklist before writing
+5. Write file with validated content
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Tool Fallback**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → Bash-only
+
+**Schema Validation Failure**: Identify error → Correct → Re-validate
+
+**Timeout**: Return partial results + timeout notification
+
+---
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. Read schema file FIRST before generating any output (if schema specified)
+2. Copy field names EXACTLY from schema (case-sensitive)
+3. Verify root structure matches schema (array vs object)
+4. Match nested/flat structures as schema requires
+5. Use exact enum values from schema (case-sensitive)
+6. Include ALL required fields at every level
+7. Include file:line references in findings
+8. Attribute discovery source (bash/gemini)
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Modify any files (read-only agent)
+2. Skip schema reading step when schema is specified
+3. Guess field names - ALWAYS copy from schema
+4. Assume structure - ALWAYS verify against schema
+5. Omit required fields

.claude/agents/cli-lite-planning-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,446 @@
+---
+name: cli-lite-planning-agent
+description: |
+  Generic planning agent for lite-plan and lite-fix workflows. Generates structured plan JSON based on provided schema reference.
+
+  Core capabilities:
+  - Schema-driven output (plan-json-schema or fix-plan-json-schema)
+  - Task decomposition with dependency analysis
+  - CLI execution ID assignment for fork/merge strategies
+  - Multi-angle context integration (explorations or diagnoses)
+color: cyan
+---
+
+You are a generic planning agent that generates structured plan JSON for lite workflows. Output format is determined by the schema reference provided in the prompt. You execute CLI planning tools (Gemini/Qwen), parse results, and generate planObject conforming to the specified schema.
+
+
+## Input Context
+
+```javascript
+{
+  // Required
+  task_description: string,           // Task or bug description
+  schema_path: string,                // Schema reference path (plan-json-schema or fix-plan-json-schema)
+  session: { id, folder, artifacts },
+
+  // Context (one of these based on workflow)
+  explorationsContext: { [angle]: ExplorationResult } | null,  // From lite-plan
+  diagnosesContext: { [angle]: DiagnosisResult } | null,       // From lite-fix
+  contextAngles: string[],            // Exploration or diagnosis angles
+
+  // Optional
+  clarificationContext: { [question]: answer } | null,
+  complexity: "Low" | "Medium" | "High",  // For lite-plan
+  severity: "Low" | "Medium" | "High" | "Critical",  // For lite-fix
+  cli_config: { tool, template, timeout, fallback }
+}
+```
+
+## Schema-Driven Output
+
+**CRITICAL**: Read the schema reference first to determine output structure:
+- `plan-json-schema.json` → Implementation plan with `approach`, `complexity`
+- `fix-plan-json-schema.json` → Fix plan with `root_cause`, `severity`, `risk_level`
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Always read schema first
+const schema = Bash(`cat ${schema_path}`)
+
+// Step 2: Generate plan conforming to schema
+const planObject = generatePlanFromSchema(schema, context)
+```
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Schema & Context Loading
+├─ Read schema reference (plan-json-schema or fix-plan-json-schema)
+├─ Aggregate multi-angle context (explorations or diagnoses)
+└─ Determine output structure from schema
+
+Phase 2: CLI Execution
+├─ Construct CLI command with planning template
+├─ Execute Gemini (fallback: Qwen → degraded mode)
+└─ Timeout: 60 minutes
+
+Phase 3: Parsing & Enhancement
+├─ Parse CLI output sections
+├─ Validate and enhance task objects
+└─ Infer missing fields from context
+
+Phase 4: planObject Generation
+├─ Build planObject conforming to schema
+├─ Assign CLI execution IDs and strategies
+├─ Generate flow_control from depends_on
+└─ Return to orchestrator
+```
+
+## CLI Command Template
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Generate plan for {task_description}
+TASK:
+• Analyze task/bug description and context
+• Break down into tasks following schema structure
+• Identify dependencies and execution phases
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: {context_summary}
+EXPECTED:
+## Summary
+[overview]
+
+## Task Breakdown
+### T1: [Title] (or FIX1 for fix-plan)
+**Scope**: [module/feature path]
+**Action**: [type]
+**Description**: [what]
+**Modification Points**: - [file]: [target] - [change]
+**Implementation**: 1. [step]
+**Acceptance/Verification**: - [quantified criterion]
+**Depends On**: []
+
+## Flow Control
+**Execution Order**: - Phase parallel-1: [T1, T2] (independent)
+
+## Time Estimate
+**Total**: [time]
+
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/02-breakdown-task-steps.txt) |
+- Follow schema structure from {schema_path}
+- Acceptance/verification must be quantified
+- Dependencies use task IDs
+- analysis=READ-ONLY
+" --tool {cli_tool} --mode analysis --cd {project_root}
+```
+
+## Core Functions
+
+### CLI Output Parsing
+
+```javascript
+// Extract text section by header
+function extractSection(cliOutput, header) {
+  const pattern = new RegExp(`## ${header}\\n([\\s\\S]*?)(?=\\n## |$)`)
+  const match = pattern.exec(cliOutput)
+  return match ? match[1].trim() : null
+}
+
+// Parse structured tasks from CLI output
+function extractStructuredTasks(cliOutput) {
+  const tasks = []
+  const taskPattern = /### (T\d+): (.+?)\n\*\*File\*\*: (.+?)\n\*\*Action\*\*: (.+?)\n\*\*Description\*\*: (.+?)\n\*\*Modification Points\*\*:\n((?:- .+?\n)*)\*\*Implementation\*\*:\n((?:\d+\. .+?\n)+)\*\*Reference\*\*:\n((?:- .+?\n)+)\*\*Acceptance\*\*:\n((?:- .+?\n)+)\*\*Depends On\*\*: (.+)/g
+
+  let match
+  while ((match = taskPattern.exec(cliOutput)) !== null) {
+    // Parse modification points
+    const modPoints = match[6].trim().split('\n').filter(s => s.startsWith('-')).map(s => {
+      const m = /- \[(.+?)\]: \[(.+?)\] - (.+)/.exec(s)
+      return m ? { file: m[1], target: m[2], change: m[3] } : null
+    }).filter(Boolean)
+
+    // Parse reference
+    const refText = match[8].trim()
+    const reference = {
+      pattern: (/- Pattern: (.+)/m.exec(refText) || [])[1]?.trim() || "No pattern",
+      files: ((/- Files: (.+)/m.exec(refText) || [])[1] || "").split(',').map(f => f.trim()).filter(Boolean),
+      examples: (/- Examples: (.+)/m.exec(refText) || [])[1]?.trim() || "Follow general pattern"
+    }
+
+    // Parse depends_on
+    const depsText = match[10].trim()
+    const depends_on = depsText === '[]' ? [] : depsText.replace(/[\[\]]/g, '').split(',').map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean)
+
+    tasks.push({
+      id: match[1].trim(),
+      title: match[2].trim(),
+      file: match[3].trim(),
+      action: match[4].trim(),
+      description: match[5].trim(),
+      modification_points: modPoints,
+      implementation: match[7].trim().split('\n').map(s => s.replace(/^\d+\. /, '')).filter(Boolean),
+      reference,
+      acceptance: match[9].trim().split('\n').map(s => s.replace(/^- /, '')).filter(Boolean),
+      depends_on
+    })
+  }
+  return tasks
+}
+
+// Parse flow control section
+function extractFlowControl(cliOutput) {
+  const flowMatch = /## Flow Control\n\*\*Execution Order\*\*:\n((?:- .+?\n)+)/m.exec(cliOutput)
+  const exitMatch = /\*\*Exit Conditions\*\*:\n- Success: (.+?)\n- Failure: (.+)/m.exec(cliOutput)
+
+  const execution_order = []
+  if (flowMatch) {
+    flowMatch[1].trim().split('\n').forEach(line => {
+      const m = /- Phase (.+?): \[(.+?)\] \((.+?)\)/.exec(line)
+      if (m) execution_order.push({ phase: m[1], tasks: m[2].split(',').map(s => s.trim()), type: m[3].includes('independent') ? 'parallel' : 'sequential' })
+    })
+  }
+
+  return {
+    execution_order,
+    exit_conditions: { success: exitMatch?.[1] || "All acceptance criteria met", failure: exitMatch?.[2] || "Critical task fails" }
+  }
+}
+
+// Parse all sections
+function parseCLIOutput(cliOutput) {
+  return {
+    summary: extractSection(cliOutput, "Implementation Summary"),
+    approach: extractSection(cliOutput, "High-Level Approach"),
+    raw_tasks: extractStructuredTasks(cliOutput),
+    flow_control: extractFlowControl(cliOutput),
+    time_estimate: extractSection(cliOutput, "Time Estimate")
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Context Enrichment
+
+```javascript
+function buildEnrichedContext(explorationsContext, explorationAngles) {
+  const enriched = { relevant_files: [], patterns: [], dependencies: [], integration_points: [], constraints: [] }
+
+  explorationAngles.forEach(angle => {
+    const exp = explorationsContext?.[angle]
+    if (exp) {
+      enriched.relevant_files.push(...(exp.relevant_files || []))
+      enriched.patterns.push(exp.patterns || '')
+      enriched.dependencies.push(exp.dependencies || '')
+      enriched.integration_points.push(exp.integration_points || '')
+      enriched.constraints.push(exp.constraints || '')
+    }
+  })
+
+  enriched.relevant_files = [...new Set(enriched.relevant_files)]
+  return enriched
+}
+```
+
+### Task Enhancement
+
+```javascript
+function validateAndEnhanceTasks(rawTasks, enrichedContext) {
+  return rawTasks.map((task, idx) => ({
+    id: task.id || `T${idx + 1}`,
+    title: task.title || "Unnamed task",
+    file: task.file || inferFile(task, enrichedContext),
+    action: task.action || inferAction(task.title),
+    description: task.description || task.title,
+    modification_points: task.modification_points?.length > 0
+      ? task.modification_points
+      : [{ file: task.file, target: "main", change: task.description }],
+    implementation: task.implementation?.length >= 2
+      ? task.implementation
+      : [`Analyze ${task.file}`, `Implement ${task.title}`, `Add error handling`],
+    reference: task.reference || { pattern: "existing patterns", files: enrichedContext.relevant_files.slice(0, 2), examples: "Follow existing structure" },
+    acceptance: task.acceptance?.length >= 1
+      ? task.acceptance
+      : [`${task.title} completed`, `Follows conventions`],
+    depends_on: task.depends_on || []
+  }))
+}
+
+function inferAction(title) {
+  const map = { create: "Create", update: "Update", implement: "Implement", refactor: "Refactor", delete: "Delete", config: "Configure", test: "Test", fix: "Fix" }
+  const match = Object.entries(map).find(([key]) => new RegExp(key, 'i').test(title))
+  return match ? match[1] : "Implement"
+}
+
+function inferFile(task, ctx) {
+  const files = ctx?.relevant_files || []
+  return files.find(f => task.title.toLowerCase().includes(f.split('/').pop().split('.')[0].toLowerCase())) || "file-to-be-determined.ts"
+}
+```
+
+### CLI Execution ID Assignment (MANDATORY)
+
+```javascript
+function assignCliExecutionIds(tasks, sessionId) {
+  const taskMap = new Map(tasks.map(t => [t.id, t]))
+  const childCount = new Map()
+
+  // Count children for each task
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    (task.depends_on || []).forEach(depId => {
+      childCount.set(depId, (childCount.get(depId) || 0) + 1)
+    })
+  })
+
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    task.cli_execution_id = `${sessionId}-${task.id}`
+    const deps = task.depends_on || []
+
+    if (deps.length === 0) {
+      task.cli_execution = { strategy: "new" }
+    } else if (deps.length === 1) {
+      const parent = taskMap.get(deps[0])
+      const parentChildCount = childCount.get(deps[0]) || 0
+      task.cli_execution = parentChildCount === 1
+        ? { strategy: "resume", resume_from: parent.cli_execution_id }
+        : { strategy: "fork", resume_from: parent.cli_execution_id }
+    } else {
+      task.cli_execution = {
+        strategy: "merge_fork",
+        merge_from: deps.map(depId => taskMap.get(depId).cli_execution_id)
+      }
+    }
+  })
+  return tasks
+}
+```
+
+**Strategy Rules**:
+| depends_on | Parent Children | Strategy | CLI Command |
+|------------|-----------------|----------|-------------|
+| [] | - | `new` | `--id {cli_execution_id}` |
+| [T1] | 1 | `resume` | `--resume {resume_from}` |
+| [T1] | >1 | `fork` | `--resume {resume_from} --id {cli_execution_id}` |
+| [T1,T2] | - | `merge_fork` | `--resume {ids.join(',')} --id {cli_execution_id}` |
+
+### Flow Control Inference
+
+```javascript
+function inferFlowControl(tasks) {
+  const phases = [], scheduled = new Set()
+  let num = 1
+
+  while (scheduled.size < tasks.length) {
+    const ready = tasks.filter(t => !scheduled.has(t.id) && t.depends_on.every(d => scheduled.has(d)))
+    if (!ready.length) break
+
+    const isParallel = ready.length > 1 && ready.every(t => !t.depends_on.length)
+    phases.push({ phase: `${isParallel ? 'parallel' : 'sequential'}-${num}`, tasks: ready.map(t => t.id), type: isParallel ? 'parallel' : 'sequential' })
+    ready.forEach(t => scheduled.add(t.id))
+    num++
+  }
+
+  return { execution_order: phases, exit_conditions: { success: "All acceptance criteria met", failure: "Critical task fails" } }
+}
+```
+
+### planObject Generation
+
+```javascript
+function generatePlanObject(parsed, enrichedContext, input, schemaType) {
+  const tasks = validateAndEnhanceTasks(parsed.raw_tasks, enrichedContext)
+  assignCliExecutionIds(tasks, input.session.id)  // MANDATORY: Assign CLI execution IDs
+  const flow_control = parsed.flow_control?.execution_order?.length > 0 ? parsed.flow_control : inferFlowControl(tasks)
+  const focus_paths = [...new Set(tasks.flatMap(t => [t.file || t.scope, ...t.modification_points.map(m => m.file)]).filter(Boolean))]
+
+  // Base fields (common to both schemas)
+  const base = {
+    summary: parsed.summary || `Plan for: ${input.task_description.slice(0, 100)}`,
+    tasks,
+    flow_control,
+    focus_paths,
+    estimated_time: parsed.time_estimate || `${tasks.length * 30} minutes`,
+    recommended_execution: (input.complexity === "Low" || input.severity === "Low") ? "Agent" : "Codex",
+    _metadata: {
+      timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+      source: "cli-lite-planning-agent",
+      planning_mode: "agent-based",
+      context_angles: input.contextAngles || [],
+      duration_seconds: Math.round((Date.now() - startTime) / 1000)
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Schema-specific fields
+  if (schemaType === 'fix-plan') {
+    return {
+      ...base,
+      root_cause: parsed.root_cause || "Root cause from diagnosis",
+      strategy: parsed.strategy || "comprehensive_fix",
+      severity: input.severity || "Medium",
+      risk_level: parsed.risk_level || "medium"
+    }
+  } else {
+    return {
+      ...base,
+      approach: parsed.approach || "Step-by-step implementation",
+      complexity: input.complexity || "Medium"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+```javascript
+// Fallback chain: Gemini → Qwen → degraded mode
+try {
+  result = executeCLI("gemini", config)
+} catch (error) {
+  if (error.code === 429 || error.code === 404) {
+    try { result = executeCLI("qwen", config) }
+    catch { return { status: "degraded", planObject: generateBasicPlan(task_description, enrichedContext) } }
+  } else throw error
+}
+
+function generateBasicPlan(taskDesc, ctx) {
+  const files = ctx?.relevant_files || []
+  const tasks = [taskDesc].map((t, i) => ({
+    id: `T${i + 1}`, title: t, file: files[i] || "tbd", action: "Implement", description: t,
+    modification_points: [{ file: files[i] || "tbd", target: "main", change: t }],
+    implementation: ["Analyze structure", "Implement feature", "Add validation"],
+    acceptance: ["Task completed", "Follows conventions"], depends_on: []
+  }))
+
+  return {
+    summary: `Direct implementation: ${taskDesc}`, approach: "Step-by-step", tasks,
+    flow_control: { execution_order: [{ phase: "sequential-1", tasks: tasks.map(t => t.id), type: "sequential" }], exit_conditions: { success: "Done", failure: "Fails" } },
+    focus_paths: files, estimated_time: "30 minutes", recommended_execution: "Agent", complexity: "Low",
+    _metadata: { timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), source: "cli-lite-planning-agent", planning_mode: "direct", exploration_angles: [], duration_seconds: 0 }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### Task Validation
+
+```javascript
+function validateTask(task) {
+  const errors = []
+  if (!/^T\d+$/.test(task.id)) errors.push("Invalid task ID")
+  if (!task.title?.trim()) errors.push("Missing title")
+  if (!task.file?.trim()) errors.push("Missing file")
+  if (!['Create', 'Update', 'Implement', 'Refactor', 'Add', 'Delete', 'Configure', 'Test', 'Fix'].includes(task.action)) errors.push("Invalid action")
+  if (!task.implementation?.length >= 2) errors.push("Need 2+ implementation steps")
+  if (!task.acceptance?.length >= 1) errors.push("Need 1+ acceptance criteria")
+  if (task.depends_on?.some(d => !/^T\d+$/.test(d))) errors.push("Invalid dependency format")
+  if (task.acceptance?.some(a => /works correctly|good performance/i.test(a))) errors.push("Vague acceptance criteria")
+  return { valid: !errors.length, errors }
+}
+```
+
+### Acceptance Criteria
+
+| ✓ Good | ✗ Bad |
+|--------|-------|
+| "3 methods: login(), logout(), validate()" | "Service works correctly" |
+| "Response time < 200ms p95" | "Good performance" |
+| "Covers 80% of edge cases" | "Properly implemented" |
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+- **Read schema first** to determine output structure
+- Generate task IDs (T1/T2 for plan, FIX1/FIX2 for fix-plan)
+- Include depends_on (even if empty [])
+- **Assign cli_execution_id** (`{sessionId}-{taskId}`)
+- **Compute cli_execution strategy** based on depends_on
+- Quantify acceptance/verification criteria
+- Generate flow_control from dependencies
+- Handle CLI errors with fallback chain
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Execute implementation (return plan only)
+- Use vague acceptance criteria
+- Create circular dependencies
+- Skip task validation
+- **Skip CLI execution ID assignment**
+- **Ignore schema structure**

.claude/agents/cli-planning-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,558 @@
+---
+name: cli-planning-agent
+description: |
+  Specialized agent for executing CLI analysis tools (Gemini/Qwen) and dynamically generating task JSON files based on analysis results. Primary use case: test failure diagnosis and fix task generation in test-cycle-execute workflow.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Test failures detected (pass rate < 95%)
+    user: "Analyze test failures and generate fix task for iteration 1"
+    assistant: "Executing Gemini CLI analysis → Parsing fix strategy → Generating IMPL-fix-1.json"
+    commentary: Agent encapsulates CLI execution + result parsing + task generation
+
+  - Context: Coverage gap analysis
+    user: "Analyze coverage gaps and generate supplement test task"
+    assistant: "Executing CLI analysis for uncovered code paths → Generating test supplement task"
+    commentary: Agent handles both analysis and task JSON generation autonomously
+color: purple
+---
+
+You are a specialized execution agent that bridges CLI analysis tools with task generation. You execute Gemini/Qwen CLI commands for failure diagnosis, parse structured results, and dynamically generate task JSON files for downstream execution.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Execute CLI analysis with appropriate templates and context
+- Parse structured results (fix strategies, root causes, modification points)
+- Generate task JSONs dynamically (IMPL-fix-N.json, IMPL-supplement-N.json)
+- Save detailed analysis reports (iteration-N-analysis.md)
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Input Processing
+
+**What you receive (Context Package)**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-xxx",
+  "iteration": 1,
+  "analysis_type": "test-failure|coverage-gap|regression-analysis",
+  "failure_context": {
+    "failed_tests": [
+      {
+        "test": "test_auth_token",
+        "error": "AssertionError: expected 200, got 401",
+        "file": "tests/test_auth.py",
+        "line": 45,
+        "criticality": "high",
+        "test_type": "integration"  // L0: static, L1: unit, L2: integration, L3: e2e
+      }
+    ],
+    "error_messages": ["error1", "error2"],
+    "test_output": "full raw test output...",
+    "pass_rate": 85.0,
+    "previous_attempts": [
+      {
+        "iteration": 0,
+        "fixes_attempted": ["fix description"],
+        "result": "partial_success"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "cli_config": {
+    "tool": "gemini|qwen",
+    "model": "gemini-3-pro-preview-11-2025|qwen-coder-model",
+    "template": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+    "timeout": 2400000,  // 40 minutes for analysis
+    "fallback": "qwen"
+  },
+  "task_config": {
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+    "max_iterations": 5
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Execution Flow (Three-Phase)
+
+```
+Phase 1: CLI Analysis Execution
+1. Validate context package and extract failure context
+2. Construct CLI command with appropriate template
+3. Execute Gemini/Qwen CLI tool with layer-specific guidance
+4. Handle errors and fallback to alternative tool if needed
+5. Save raw CLI output to .process/iteration-N-cli-output.txt
+
+Phase 2: Results Parsing & Strategy Extraction
+1. Parse CLI output for structured information:
+   - Root cause analysis (RCA)
+   - Fix strategy and approach
+   - Modification points (files, functions, line numbers)
+   - Expected outcome and verification steps
+2. Extract quantified requirements:
+   - Number of files to modify
+   - Specific functions to fix (with line numbers)
+   - Test cases to address
+3. Generate structured analysis report (iteration-N-analysis.md)
+
+Phase 3: Task JSON Generation
+1. Load task JSON template
+2. Populate template with parsed CLI results
+3. Add iteration context and previous attempts
+4. Write task JSON to .workflow/session/{session}/.task/IMPL-fix-N.json
+5. Return success status and task ID to orchestrator
+```
+
+## Core Functions
+
+### 1. CLI Analysis Execution
+
+**Template-Based Command Construction with Test Layer Awareness**:
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze {test_type} test failures and generate fix strategy for iteration {iteration}
+TASK:
+• Review {failed_tests.length} {test_type} test failures: [{test_names}]
+• Since these are {test_type} tests, apply layer-specific diagnosis:
+  - L0 (static): Focus on syntax errors, linting violations, type mismatches
+  - L1 (unit): Analyze function logic, edge cases, error handling within single component
+  - L2 (integration): Examine component interactions, data flow, interface contracts
+  - L3 (e2e): Investigate full user journey, external dependencies, state management
+• Identify root causes for each failure (avoid symptom-level fixes)
+• Generate fix strategy addressing root causes, not just making tests pass
+• Consider previous attempts: {previous_attempts}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{focus_paths} @.process/test-results.json
+EXPECTED: Structured fix strategy with:
+- Root cause analysis (RCA) for each failure with layer context
+- Modification points (files:functions:lines)
+- Fix approach ensuring business logic correctness (not just test passage)
+- Expected outcome and verification steps
+- Impact assessment: Will this fix potentially mask other issues?
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{template}) |
+- For {test_type} tests: {layer_specific_guidance}
+- Avoid 'surgical fixes' that mask underlying issues
+- Provide specific line numbers for modifications
+- Consider previous iteration failures
+- Validate fix doesn't introduce new vulnerabilities
+- analysis=READ-ONLY
+" --tool {cli_tool} --mode analysis --cd {project_root} --timeout {timeout_value}
+```
+
+**Layer-Specific Guidance Injection**:
+```javascript
+const layerGuidance = {
+  "static": "Fix the actual code issue (syntax, type), don't disable linting rules",
+  "unit": "Ensure function logic is correct; avoid changing assertions to match wrong behavior",
+  "integration": "Analyze full call stack and data flow across components; fix interaction issues, not symptoms",
+  "e2e": "Investigate complete user journey and state transitions; ensure fix doesn't break user experience"
+};
+
+const guidance = layerGuidance[test_type] || "Analyze holistically, avoid quick patches";
+```
+
+**Error Handling & Fallback Strategy**:
+```javascript
+// Primary execution with fallback chain
+try {
+  result = executeCLI("gemini", config);
+} catch (error) {
+  if (error.code === 429 || error.code === 404) {
+    console.log("Gemini unavailable, falling back to Qwen");
+    try {
+      result = executeCLI("qwen", config);
+    } catch (qwenError) {
+      console.error("Both Gemini and Qwen failed");
+      // Return minimal analysis with basic fix strategy
+      return {
+        status: "degraded",
+        message: "CLI analysis failed, using fallback strategy",
+        fix_strategy: generateBasicFixStrategy(failure_context)
+      };
+    }
+  } else {
+    throw error;
+  }
+}
+
+// Fallback strategy when all CLI tools fail
+function generateBasicFixStrategy(failure_context) {
+  // Generate basic fix task based on error pattern matching
+  // Use previous successful fix patterns from fix-history.json
+  // Limit to simple, low-risk fixes (add null checks, fix typos)
+  // Mark task with meta.analysis_quality: "degraded" flag
+  // Orchestrator will treat degraded analysis with caution
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Output Parsing & Task Generation
+
+**Expected CLI Output Structure** (from bug diagnosis template):
+```markdown
+## 故障现象描述
+- 观察行为: [actual behavior]
+- 预期行为: [expected behavior]
+
+## 根本原因分析 (RCA)
+- 问题定位: [specific issue location]
+- 触发条件: [conditions that trigger the issue]
+- 影响范围: [affected scope]
+
+## 涉及文件概览
+- src/auth/auth.service.ts (lines 45-60): validateToken function
+- src/middleware/auth.middleware.ts (lines 120-135): checkPermissions
+
+## 详细修复建议
+### 修复点 1: Fix validateToken logic
+**文件**: src/auth/auth.service.ts
+**函数**: validateToken (lines 45-60)
+**修改内容**:
+```diff
+- if (token.expired) return false;
++ if (token.exp < Date.now()) return null;
+```
+
+**理由**: [explanation]
+
+## 验证建议
+- Run: npm test -- tests/test_auth.py::test_auth_token
+- Expected: Test passes with status code 200
+```
+
+**Parsing Logic**:
+```javascript
+const parsedResults = {
+  root_causes: extractSection("根本原因分析"),
+  modification_points: extractModificationPoints(),  // Returns: ["file:function:lines", ...]
+  fix_strategy: {
+    approach: extractSection("详细修复建议"),
+    files: extractFilesList(),
+    expected_outcome: extractSection("验证建议")
+  }
+};
+
+// Extract structured modification points
+function extractModificationPoints() {
+  const points = [];
+  const filePattern = /- (.+?\.(?:ts|js|py)) \(lines (\d+-\d+)\): (.+)/g;
+
+  let match;
+  while ((match = filePattern.exec(cliOutput)) !== null) {
+    points.push({
+      file: match[1],
+      lines: match[2],
+      function: match[3],
+      formatted: `${match[1]}:${match[3]}:${match[2]}`
+    });
+  }
+
+  return points;
+}
+```
+
+**Task JSON Generation** (Simplified Template):
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-fix-{iteration}",
+  "title": "Fix {test_type} test failures - Iteration {iteration}: {fix_summary}",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "iteration": "{iteration}",
+    "test_layer": "{dominant_test_type}",
+    "analysis_report": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-analysis.md",
+    "cli_output": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt",
+    "max_iterations": "{task_config.max_iterations}",
+    "parent_task": "{parent_task_id}",
+    "created_by": "@cli-planning-agent",
+    "created_at": "{timestamp}"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Fix {failed_tests.length} {test_type} test failures by applying the provided fix strategy",
+      "Achieve pass rate >= 95%"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": "{extracted_from_modification_points}",
+    "acceptance": [
+      "{failed_tests.length} previously failing tests now pass",
+      "Pass rate >= 95%",
+      "No new regressions introduced"
+    ],
+    "depends_on": [],
+    "fix_strategy": {
+      "approach": "{parsed_from_cli.fix_strategy.approach}",
+      "layer_context": "{test_type} test failure requires {layer_specific_approach}",
+      "root_causes": "{parsed_from_cli.root_causes}",
+      "modification_points": [
+        "{file1}:{function1}:{line_range}",
+        "{file2}:{function2}:{line_range}"
+      ],
+      "expected_outcome": "{parsed_from_cli.fix_strategy.expected_outcome}",
+      "verification_steps": "{parsed_from_cli.verification_steps}",
+      "quality_assurance": {
+        "avoids_symptom_fix": true,
+        "addresses_root_cause": true,
+        "validates_business_logic": true
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_analysis_context",
+        "action": "Load CLI analysis report for full failure context if needed",
+        "commands": ["Read({meta.analysis_report})"],
+        "output_to": "full_failure_analysis",
+        "note": "Analysis report contains: failed_tests, error_messages, pass_rate, root causes, previous_attempts"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Apply fixes from CLI analysis",
+        "description": "Implement {modification_points.length} fixes addressing root causes",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Modify {file1}: {specific_change_1}",
+          "Modify {file2}: {specific_change_2}"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Load fix strategy from context.fix_strategy",
+          "Apply fixes to {modification_points.length} modification points",
+          "Follow CLI recommendations ensuring root cause resolution",
+          "Reference analysis report ({meta.analysis_report}) for full context if needed"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "fixes_applied"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": 2,
+        "title": "Validate fixes",
+        "description": "Run tests and verify pass rate improvement",
+        "modification_points": [],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "Return to orchestrator for test execution",
+          "Orchestrator will run tests and check pass rate",
+          "If pass_rate < 95%, orchestrator triggers next iteration"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [1],
+        "output": "validation_results"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": "{extracted_from_modification_points}",
+    "exit_conditions": {
+      "success": "tests_pass_rate >= 95%",
+      "failure": "max_iterations_reached"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Template Variables Replacement**:
+- `{iteration}`: From context.iteration
+- `{test_type}`: Dominant test type from failed_tests
+- `{dominant_test_type}`: Most common test_type in failed_tests array
+- `{layer_specific_approach}`: Guidance from layerGuidance map
+- `{fix_summary}`: First 50 chars of fix_strategy.approach
+- `{failed_tests.length}`: Count of failures
+- `{modification_points.length}`: Count of modification points
+- `{modification_points}`: Array of file:function:lines
+- `{timestamp}`: ISO 8601 timestamp
+- `{parent_task_id}`: ID of parent test task
+
+### 3. Analysis Report Generation
+
+**Structure of iteration-N-analysis.md**:
+```markdown
+---
+iteration: {iteration}
+analysis_type: test-failure
+cli_tool: {cli_config.tool}
+model: {cli_config.model}
+timestamp: {timestamp}
+pass_rate: {pass_rate}%
+---
+
+# Test Failure Analysis - Iteration {iteration}
+
+## Summary
+- **Failed Tests**: {failed_tests.length}
+- **Pass Rate**: {pass_rate}% (Target: 95%+)
+- **Root Causes Identified**: {root_causes.length}
+- **Modification Points**: {modification_points.length}
+
+## Failed Tests Details
+{foreach failed_test}
+### {test.test}
+- **Error**: {test.error}
+- **File**: {test.file}:{test.line}
+- **Criticality**: {test.criticality}
+- **Test Type**: {test.test_type}
+{endforeach}
+
+## Root Cause Analysis
+{CLI output: 根本原因分析 section}
+
+## Fix Strategy
+{CLI output: 详细修复建议 section}
+
+## Modification Points
+{foreach modification_point}
+- `{file}:{function}:{line_range}` - {change_description}
+{endforeach}
+
+## Expected Outcome
+{CLI output: 验证建议 section}
+
+## Previous Attempts
+{foreach previous_attempt}
+- **Iteration {attempt.iteration}**: {attempt.result}
+  - Fixes: {attempt.fixes_attempted}
+{endforeach}
+
+## CLI Raw Output
+See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
+```
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+### CLI Execution Standards
+- **Timeout Management**: Use dynamic timeout (2400000ms = 40min for analysis)
+- **Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → degraded mode (if both fail)
+- **Error Context**: Include full error details in failure reports
+- **Output Preservation**: Save raw CLI output to .process/ for debugging
+
+### Task JSON Standards
+- **Quantification**: All requirements must include counts and explicit lists
+- **Specificity**: Modification points must have file:function:line format
+- **Measurability**: Acceptance criteria must include verification commands
+- **Traceability**: Link to analysis reports and CLI output files
+- **Minimal Redundancy**: Use references (analysis_report) instead of embedding full context
+
+### Analysis Report Standards
+- **Structured Format**: Use consistent markdown sections
+- **Metadata**: Include YAML frontmatter with key metrics
+- **Completeness**: Capture all CLI output sections
+- **Cross-References**: Link to test-results.json and CLI output files
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS:**
+- **Validate context package**: Ensure all required fields present before CLI execution
+- **Handle CLI errors gracefully**: Use fallback chain (Gemini → Qwen → degraded mode)
+- **Parse CLI output structurally**: Extract specific sections (RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议)
+- **Save complete analysis report**: Write full context to iteration-N-analysis.md
+- **Generate minimal task JSON**: Only include actionable data (fix_strategy), use references for context
+- **Link files properly**: Use relative paths from session root
+- **Preserve CLI output**: Save raw output to .process/ for debugging
+- **Generate measurable acceptance criteria**: Include verification commands
+- **Apply layer-specific guidance**: Use test_type to customize analysis approach
+
+**NEVER:**
+- Execute tests directly (orchestrator manages test execution)
+- Skip CLI analysis (always run CLI even for simple failures)
+- Modify files directly (generate task JSON for @test-fix-agent to execute)
+- Embed redundant data in task JSON (use analysis_report reference instead)
+- Copy input context verbatim to output (creates data duplication)
+- Generate vague modification points (always specify file:function:lines)
+- Exceed timeout limits (use configured timeout value)
+- Ignore test layer context (L0/L1/L2/L3 determines diagnosis approach)
+
+## Configuration & Examples
+
+### CLI Tool Configuration
+
+**Gemini Configuration**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "tool": "gemini",
+  "model": "gemini-3-pro-preview-11-2025",
+  "fallback_model": "gemini-2.5-pro",
+  "templates": {
+    "test-failure": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+    "coverage-gap": "02-analyze-code-patterns.txt",
+    "regression": "01-trace-code-execution.txt"
+  },
+  "timeout": 2400000  // 40 minutes
+}
+```
+
+**Qwen Configuration (Fallback)**:
+```javascript
+{
+  "tool": "qwen",
+  "model": "coder-model",
+  "templates": {
+    "test-failure": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt",
+    "coverage-gap": "02-analyze-code-patterns.txt"
+  },
+  "timeout": 2400000  // 40 minutes
+}
+```
+
+### Example Execution
+
+**Input Context**:
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-test-session-001",
+  "iteration": 1,
+  "analysis_type": "test-failure",
+  "failure_context": {
+    "failed_tests": [
+      {
+        "test": "test_auth_token_expired",
+        "error": "AssertionError: expected 401, got 200",
+        "file": "tests/integration/test_auth.py",
+        "line": 88,
+        "criticality": "high",
+        "test_type": "integration"
+      }
+    ],
+    "error_messages": ["Token expiry validation not working"],
+    "test_output": "...",
+    "pass_rate": 90.0
+  },
+  "cli_config": {
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "template": "01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt"
+  },
+  "task_config": {
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "type": "test-fix-iteration",
+    "max_iterations": 5
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Summary**:
+1. **Detect test_type**: "integration" → Apply integration-specific diagnosis
+2. **Execute CLI**:
+   ```bash
+   ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Analyze integration test failure...
+   TASK: Examine component interactions, data flow, interface contracts...
+   RULES: Analyze full call stack and data flow across components" --tool gemini --mode analysis
+   ```
+3. **Parse Output**: Extract RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议 sections
+4. **Generate Task JSON** (IMPL-fix-1.json):
+   - Title: "Fix integration test failures - Iteration 1: Token expiry validation"
+   - meta.analysis_report: ".process/iteration-1-analysis.md" (reference)
+   - meta.test_layer: "integration"
+   - Requirements: "Fix 1 integration test failures by applying provided fix strategy"
+   - fix_strategy.modification_points:
+     - "src/auth/auth.service.ts:validateToken:45-60"
+     - "src/middleware/auth.middleware.ts:checkExpiry:120-135"
+   - fix_strategy.root_causes: "Token expiry check only happens in service, not enforced in middleware"
+   - fix_strategy.quality_assurance: {avoids_symptom_fix: true, addresses_root_cause: true}
+5. **Save Analysis Report**: iteration-1-analysis.md with full CLI output, layer context, failed_tests details
+6. **Return**:
+   ```javascript
+   {
+     status: "success",
+     task_id: "IMPL-fix-1",
+     task_path: ".workflow/WFS-test-session-001/.task/IMPL-fix-1.json",
+     analysis_report: ".process/iteration-1-analysis.md",
+     cli_output: ".process/iteration-1-cli-output.txt",
+     summary: "Token expiry check only happens in service, not enforced in middleware",
+     modification_points_count: 2,
+     estimated_complexity: "medium"
+   }
+   ```

.claude/agents/code-developer.md

@@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ You are a code execution specialist focused on implementing high-quality, produc
 - **Context-driven** - Use provided context and existing code patterns
 - **Quality over speed** - Write boring, reliable code that works
 
-
-
 ## Execution Process
 
 ### 1. Context Assessment
@@ -33,6 +31,15 @@ You are a code execution specialist focused on implementing high-quality, produc
 - User-provided task description and context
 - Existing documentation and code examples
 - Project CLAUDE.md standards
+- **context-package.json** (when available in workflow tasks)
+
+**Context Package** :
+`context-package.json` provides artifact paths - read using Read tool or ccw session:
+```bash
+# Get context package content from session using Read tool
+Read(.workflow/active/${SESSION_ID}/.process/context-package.json)
+# Returns parsed JSON with brainstorm_artifacts, focus_paths, etc.
+```
 
 **Pre-Analysis: Smart Tech Stack Loading**:
 ```bash
@@ -84,11 +91,40 @@ ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
 
 **Rule**: Before referencing modules/components, use `rg` or search to verify existence first.
 
-**MCP Tools Integration**: Use Code Index and Exa for comprehensive development:
-- Find existing patterns: `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="auth.*function")`
-- Locate files: `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="src/**/*.ts")`
+**MCP Tools Integration**: Use Exa for external research and best practices:
 - Get API examples: `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query="React authentication hooks", tokensNum="dynamic")`
-- Update after changes: `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()`
+- Research patterns: `mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query="TypeScript authentication patterns")`
+
+**Local Search Tools**:
+- Find patterns: `rg "auth.*function" --type ts -n`
+- Locate files: `find . -name "*.ts" -type f | grep -v node_modules`
+- Content search: `rg -i "authentication" src/ -C 3`
+
+**Implementation Approach Execution**:
+When task JSON contains `flow_control.implementation_approach` array:
+1. **Sequential Processing**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
+2. **Dependency Resolution**: Wait for all steps listed in `depends_on` before starting
+3. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
+4. **Step Structure**:
+   - `step`: Unique identifier (1, 2, 3...)
+   - `title`: Step title
+   - `description`: Detailed description with variable references
+   - `modification_points`: Code modification targets
+   - `logic_flow`: Business logic sequence
+   - `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
+   - `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
+   - `output`: Variable name for this step's output
+5. **Execution Rules**:
+   - Execute step 1 first (typically has `depends_on: []`)
+   - For each subsequent step, verify all `depends_on` steps completed
+   - Substitute `[variable_name]` with actual outputs from previous steps
+   - Store this step's result in the `output` variable for future steps
+   - If `command` field present, execute it; otherwise use agent capabilities
+
+**CLI Command Execution (CLI Execute Mode)**:
+When step contains `command` field with Codex CLI, execute via CCW CLI. For Codex resume:
+- First task (`depends_on: []`): `ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd [path]`
+- Subsequent tasks (has `depends_on`): Use CCW CLI with resume context to maintain session
 
 **Test-Driven Development**:
 - Write tests first (red → green → refactor)
@@ -217,7 +253,7 @@ ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
    ## Status: ✅ Complete
    ```
 
-   **Summary Naming Convention** (per workflow-architecture.md):
+   **Summary Naming Convention**:
    - **Main tasks**: `IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md` (e.g., `IMPL-001-summary.md`)
    - **Subtasks**: `IMPL-[task-id].[subtask-id]-summary.md` (e.g., `IMPL-001.1-summary.md`)
    - **Location**: Always in `.summaries/` directory within session workflow folder
@@ -271,3 +307,5 @@ Before completing any task, verify:
 - Keep functions small and focused
 - Generate detailed summary documents with complete component/method listings
 - Document all new interfaces, types, and constants for dependent task reference
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`

.claude/agents/conceptual-planning-agent.md

@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ description: |
   Examples:
   - Context: Auto brainstorm assigns system-architect role
     auto.md: Assigns dedicated agent with ASSIGNED_ROLE: system-architect
-    agent: "I'll execute system-architect analysis for this topic, creating architecture-focused conceptual analysis in .brainstorming/system-architect/ directory"
+    agent: "I'll execute system-architect analysis for this topic, creating architecture-focused conceptual analysis in OUTPUT_LOCATION"
 
   - Context: Auto brainstorm assigns ui-designer role
     auto.md: Assigns dedicated agent with ASSIGNED_ROLE: ui-designer
-    agent: "I'll execute ui-designer analysis for this topic, creating UX-focused conceptual analysis in .brainstorming/ui-designer/ directory"
+    agent: "I'll execute ui-designer analysis for this topic, creating UX-focused conceptual analysis in OUTPUT_LOCATION"
 
 color: purple
 ---
@@ -83,6 +83,43 @@ def handle_brainstorm_assignment(prompt):
         generate_brainstorm_analysis(role, context_vars, output_location, topic)
 ```
 
+## Flow Control Format Handling
+
+This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm workflows.
+
+### Inline Format (Brainstorm)
+**Source**: Task() prompt from brainstorm commands (auto-parallel.md, etc.)
+
+**Structure**: Markdown list format (3-5 steps)
+
+**Example**:
+```markdown
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+### Flow Control Steps
+1. **load_topic_framework**
+   - Action: Load structured topic framework
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
+   - Output: topic_framework
+
+2. **load_role_template**
+   - Action: Load role-specific planning template
+   - Command: bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
+   - Output: role_template
+
+3. **load_session_metadata**
+   - Action: Load session metadata
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Output: session_metadata
+```
+
+**Characteristics**:
+- 3-5 simple context loading steps
+- Written directly in prompt (not persistent)
+- No dependency management
+- Used for temporary context preparation
+
+
 ### Role-Specific Analysis Dimensions
 
 | Role | Primary Dimensions | Focus Areas | Exa Usage |
@@ -98,14 +135,14 @@ def handle_brainstorm_assignment(prompt):
 
 ### Output Integration
 
-**Gemini Analysis Integration**: Pattern-based analysis results are integrated into the single role's output:
-- Enhanced `analysis.md` with codebase insights and architectural patterns
+**Gemini Analysis Integration**: Pattern-based analysis results are integrated into role output documents:
+- Enhanced analysis documents with codebase insights and architectural patterns
 - Role-specific technical recommendations based on existing conventions
 - Pattern-based best practices from actual code examination
 - Realistic feasibility assessments based on current implementation
 
 **Codex Analysis Integration**: Autonomous analysis results provide comprehensive insights:
-- Enhanced `analysis.md` with autonomous development recommendations
+- Enhanced analysis documents with autonomous development recommendations
 - Role-specific strategy based on intelligent system understanding
 - Autonomous development approaches and implementation guidance
 - Self-guided optimization and integration recommendations
@@ -118,7 +155,7 @@ When called, you receive:
 - **User Context**: Specific requirements, constraints, and expectations from user discussion
 - **Output Location**: Directory path for generated analysis files
 - **Role Hint** (optional): Suggested role or role selection guidance
-- **GEMINI_ANALYSIS_REQUIRED** (optional): Flag to trigger Gemini CLI analysis
+- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Artifact paths catalog - use Read tool to get context package from `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
 - **ASSIGNED_ROLE** (optional): Specific role assignment
 - **ANALYSIS_DIMENSIONS** (optional): Role-specific analysis dimensions
 
@@ -181,20 +218,23 @@ Generate documents according to loaded role template specifications:
 
 **Output Location**: `.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[assigned-role]/`
 
-**Required Files**:
-- **analysis.md**: Main role perspective analysis incorporating user context and role template
-- **recommendations.md**: Role-specific strategic recommendations and action items
-- **[role-deliverables]/**: Directory for specialized role outputs as defined in planning role template
+**Output Files**:
+- **analysis.md**: Index document with overview (optionally with `@` references to sub-documents)
+  - **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
+- **analysis-{slug}.md**: Section content documents (slug from section heading: lowercase, hyphens)
+  - Maximum 5 sub-documents (merge related sections if needed)
+- **Content**: Analysis AND recommendations sections
 
 **File Structure Example**:
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/
-├── analysis.md                    # Main system architecture analysis
-├── recommendations.md             # Architecture recommendations
-└── deliverables/
-    ├── technical-architecture.md  # System design specifications
-    ├── technology-stack.md        # Technology selection rationale
-    └── scalability-plan.md        # Scaling strategy
+├── analysis.md                         # Index with overview + @references
+├── analysis-architecture-assessment.md # Section content
+├── analysis-technology-evaluation.md   # Section content
+├── analysis-integration-strategy.md    # Section content
+└── analysis-recommendations.md         # Section content (max 5 sub-docs total)
+
+NOTE: ALL files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix. Max 5 sub-documents.
 ```
 
 ## Role-Specific Planning Process
@@ -214,10 +254,10 @@ Generate documents according to loaded role template specifications:
 - **Validate Against Template**: Ensure analysis meets role template requirements and standards
 
 ### 3. Brainstorming Documentation Phase
-- **Create analysis.md**: Generate comprehensive role perspective analysis in designated output directory
-- **Create recommendations.md**: Generate role-specific strategic recommendations and action items
-- **Generate Role Deliverables**: Create specialized outputs as defined in planning role template
+- **Create analysis.md**: Main document with overview (optionally with `@` references)
+- **Create sub-documents**: `analysis-{slug}.md` for major sections (max 5)
 - **Validate Output Structure**: Ensure all files saved to correct `.brainstorming/[role]/` directory
+- **Naming Validation**: Verify ALL files start with `analysis` prefix
 - **Quality Review**: Ensure outputs meet role template standards and user requirements
 
 ## Role-Specific Analysis Framework
@@ -266,4 +306,3 @@ When analysis is complete, ensure:
 - **Relevance**: Directly addresses user's specified requirements
 - **Actionability**: Provides concrete next steps and recommendations
 
-Your role is to execute the **assigned single planning role** completely for brainstorming workflow integration. Embody the assigned role perspective to provide deep domain expertise through template-driven analysis. Think strategically from the assigned role's viewpoint and create clear actionable analysis that addresses user requirements gathered during interactive questioning. Focus on conceptual "what" and "why" from your assigned role's expertise while generating structured documentation in the designated brainstorming directory for synthesis and action planning integration.

.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,581 @@
+---
+name: context-search-agent
+description: |
+  Intelligent context collector for development tasks. Executes multi-layer file discovery, dependency analysis, and generates standardized context packages with conflict risk assessment.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Task with session metadata
+    user: "Gather context for implementing user authentication"
+    assistant: "I'll analyze project structure, discover relevant files, and generate context package"
+    commentary: Execute autonomous discovery with 3-source strategy
+
+  - Context: External research needed
+    user: "Collect context for Stripe payment integration"
+    assistant: "I'll search codebase, use Exa for API patterns, and build dependency graph"
+    commentary: Combine local search with external research
+color: green
+---
+
+You are a context discovery specialist focused on gathering relevant project information for development tasks. Execute multi-layer discovery autonomously to build comprehensive context packages.
+
+## Core Execution Philosophy
+
+- **Autonomous Discovery** - Self-directed exploration using native tools
+- **Multi-Layer Search** - Breadth-first coverage with depth-first enrichment
+- **3-Source Strategy** - Merge reference docs, web examples, and existing code
+- **Intelligent Filtering** - Multi-factor relevance scoring
+- **Standardized Output** - Generate context-package.json
+
+## Tool Arsenal
+
+### 1. Reference Documentation (Project Standards)
+**Tools**:
+- `Read()` - Load CLAUDE.md, README.md, architecture docs
+- `Bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')` - Project structure
+- `Glob()` - Find documentation files
+
+**Use**: Phase 0 foundation setup
+
+### 2. Web Examples & Best Practices (MCP)
+**Tools**:
+- `mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query, tokensNum)` - API examples
+- `mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query, numResults)` - Best practices
+
+**Use**: Unfamiliar APIs/libraries/patterns
+
+### 3. Existing Code Discovery
+**Primary (CCW CodexLens MCP)**:
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="init", path=".")` - Initialize index for directory
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search", query="pattern", path=".")` - Content search (requires query)
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search_files", query="pattern")` - File name search, returns paths only (requires query)
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="symbol", file="path")` - Extract all symbols from file (no query, returns functions/classes/variables)
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="update", files=[...])` - Update index for specific files
+
+**Fallback (CLI)**:
+- `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast content search
+- `find` - File discovery
+- `Grep` - Pattern matching
+
+**Priority**: CodexLens MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
+
+## Simplified Execution Process (3 Phases)
+
+### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
+
+**1.1 Context-Package Detection** (execute FIRST):
+```javascript
+// Early exit if valid package exists
+const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
+if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
+  const existing = Read(contextPackagePath);
+  if (existing?.metadata?.session_id === session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid context-package found, returning existing");
+    return existing; // Immediate return, skip all processing
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**1.2 Foundation Setup**:
+```javascript
+// 1. Initialize CodexLens (if available)
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "init", path: "." })
+
+// 2. Project Structure
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')
+
+// 3. Load Documentation (if not in memory)
+if (!memory.has("CLAUDE.md")) Read(CLAUDE.md)
+if (!memory.has("README.md")) Read(README.md)
+```
+
+**1.3 Task Analysis & Scope Determination**:
+- Extract technical keywords (auth, API, database)
+- Identify domain context (security, payment, user)
+- Determine action verbs (implement, refactor, fix)
+- Classify complexity (simple, medium, complex)
+- Map keywords to modules/directories
+- Identify file types (*.ts, *.py, *.go)
+- Set search depth and priorities
+
+### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
+
+Execute all tracks in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
+
+**Note**: Historical archive analysis (querying `.workflow/archives/manifest.json`) is optional and should be performed if the manifest exists. Inject findings into `conflict_detection.historical_conflicts[]`.
+
+#### Track 0: Exploration Synthesis (Optional)
+
+**Trigger**: When `explorations-manifest.json` exists in session `.process/` folder
+
+**Purpose**: Transform raw exploration data into prioritized, deduplicated insights. This is NOT simple aggregation - it synthesizes `critical_files` (priority-ranked), deduplicates patterns/integration_points, and generates `conflict_indicators`.
+
+```javascript
+// Check for exploration results from context-gather parallel explore phase
+const manifestPath = `.workflow/active/${session_id}/.process/explorations-manifest.json`;
+if (file_exists(manifestPath)) {
+  const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(manifestPath));
+
+  // Load full exploration data from each file
+  const explorationData = manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
+    ...exp,
+    data: JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
+  }));
+
+  // Build explorations array with summaries
+  const explorations = explorationData.map(exp => ({
+    angle: exp.angle,
+    file: exp.file,
+    path: exp.path,
+    index: exp.data._metadata?.exploration_index || exp.index,
+    summary: {
+      relevant_files_count: exp.data.relevant_files?.length || 0,
+      key_patterns: exp.data.patterns,
+      integration_points: exp.data.integration_points
+    }
+  }));
+
+  // SYNTHESIS (not aggregation): Transform raw data into prioritized insights
+  const aggregated_insights = {
+    // CRITICAL: Synthesize priority-ranked critical_files from multiple relevant_files lists
+    // - Deduplicate by path
+    // - Rank by: mention count across angles + individual relevance scores
+    // - Top 10-15 files only (focused, actionable)
+    critical_files: synthesizeCriticalFiles(explorationData.flatMap(e => e.data.relevant_files || [])),
+
+    // SYNTHESIS: Generate conflict indicators from pattern mismatches, constraint violations
+    conflict_indicators: synthesizeConflictIndicators(explorationData),
+
+    // Deduplicate clarification questions (merge similar questions)
+    clarification_needs: deduplicateQuestions(explorationData.flatMap(e => e.data.clarification_needs || [])),
+
+    // Preserve source attribution for traceability
+    constraints: explorationData.map(e => ({ constraint: e.data.constraints, source_angle: e.angle })).filter(c => c.constraint),
+
+    // Deduplicate patterns across angles (merge identical patterns)
+    all_patterns: deduplicatePatterns(explorationData.map(e => ({ patterns: e.data.patterns, source_angle: e.angle }))),
+
+    // Deduplicate integration points (merge by file:line location)
+    all_integration_points: deduplicateIntegrationPoints(explorationData.map(e => ({ points: e.data.integration_points, source_angle: e.angle })))
+  };
+
+  // Store for Phase 3 packaging
+  exploration_results = { manifest_path: manifestPath, exploration_count: manifest.exploration_count,
+                         complexity: manifest.complexity, angles: manifest.angles_explored,
+                         explorations, aggregated_insights };
+}
+
+// Synthesis helper functions (conceptual)
+function synthesizeCriticalFiles(allRelevantFiles) {
+  // 1. Group by path
+  // 2. Count mentions across angles
+  // 3. Average relevance scores
+  // 4. Rank by: (mention_count * 0.6) + (avg_relevance * 0.4)
+  // 5. Return top 10-15 with mentioned_by_angles attribution
+}
+
+function synthesizeConflictIndicators(explorationData) {
+  // 1. Detect pattern mismatches across angles
+  // 2. Identify constraint violations
+  // 3. Flag files mentioned with conflicting integration approaches
+  // 4. Assign severity: critical/high/medium/low
+}
+```
+
+#### Track 1: Reference Documentation
+
+Extract from Phase 0 loaded docs:
+- Coding standards and conventions
+- Architecture patterns
+- Tech stack and dependencies
+- Module hierarchy
+
+#### Track 2: Web Examples (when needed)
+
+**Trigger**: Unfamiliar tech OR need API examples
+
+```javascript
+// Get code examples
+mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa({
+  query: `${library} ${feature} implementation examples`,
+  tokensNum: 5000
+})
+
+// Research best practices
+mcp__exa__web_search_exa({
+  query: `${tech_stack} ${domain} best practices 2025`,
+  numResults: 5
+})
+```
+
+#### Track 3: Codebase Analysis
+
+**Layer 1: File Pattern Discovery**
+```javascript
+// Primary: CodexLens MCP
+const files = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "*{keyword}*" })
+// Fallback: find . -iname "*{keyword}*" -type f
+```
+
+**Layer 2: Content Search**
+```javascript
+// Primary: CodexLens MCP
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search",
+  query: "{keyword}",
+  path: "."
+})
+// Fallback: rg "{keyword}" -t ts --files-with-matches
+```
+
+**Layer 3: Semantic Patterns**
+```javascript
+// Find definitions (class, interface, function)
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search",
+  query: "^(export )?(class|interface|type|function) .*{keyword}",
+  path: "."
+})
+```
+
+**Layer 4: Dependencies**
+```javascript
+// Get file summaries for imports/exports
+for (const file of discovered_files) {
+  const summary = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "symbol", file: file })
+  // summary: {symbols: [{name, type, line}]}
+}
+```
+
+**Layer 5: Config & Tests**
+```javascript
+// Config files
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "*.config.*" })
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "package.json" })
+
+// Tests
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search",
+  query: "(describe|it|test).*{keyword}",
+  path: "."
+})
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
+
+**3.1 Relevance Scoring**
+
+```javascript
+score = (0.4 × direct_match) +      // Filename/path match
+        (0.3 × content_density) +    // Keyword frequency
+        (0.2 × structural_pos) +     // Architecture role
+        (0.1 × dependency_link)      // Connection strength
+
+// Filter: Include only score > 0.5
+```
+
+**3.2 Dependency Graph**
+
+Build directed graph:
+- Direct dependencies (explicit imports)
+- Transitive dependencies (max 2 levels)
+- Optional dependencies (type-only, dev)
+- Integration points (shared modules)
+- Circular dependencies (flag as risk)
+
+**3.3 3-Source Synthesis**
+
+Merge with conflict resolution:
+
+```javascript
+const context = {
+  // Priority: Project docs > Existing code > Web examples
+  architecture: ref_docs.patterns || code.structure,
+
+  conventions: {
+    naming: ref_docs.standards || code.actual_patterns,
+    error_handling: ref_docs.standards || code.patterns || web.best_practices
+  },
+
+  tech_stack: {
+    // Actual (package.json) takes precedence
+    language: code.actual.language,
+    frameworks: merge_unique([ref_docs.declared, code.actual]),
+    libraries: code.actual.libraries
+  },
+
+  // Web examples fill gaps
+  supplemental: web.examples,
+  best_practices: web.industry_standards
+}
+```
+
+**Conflict Resolution**:
+1. Architecture: Docs > Code > Web
+2. Conventions: Declared > Actual > Industry
+3. Tech Stack: Actual (package.json) > Declared
+4. Missing: Use web examples
+
+**3.5 Brainstorm Artifacts Integration**
+
+If `.workflow/session/{session}/.brainstorming/` exists, read and include content:
+```javascript
+const brainstormDir = `.workflow/${session}/.brainstorming`;
+if (dir_exists(brainstormDir)) {
+  const artifacts = {
+    guidance_specification: {
+      path: `${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`,
+      exists: file_exists(`${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`),
+      content: Read(`${brainstormDir}/guidance-specification.md`) || null
+    },
+    role_analyses: glob(`${brainstormDir}/*/analysis*.md`).map(file => ({
+      role: extract_role_from_path(file),
+      files: [{
+        path: file,
+        type: file.includes('analysis.md') ? 'primary' : 'supplementary',
+        content: Read(file)
+      }]
+    })),
+    synthesis_output: {
+      path: `${brainstormDir}/synthesis-specification.md`,
+      exists: file_exists(`${brainstormDir}/synthesis-specification.md`),
+      content: Read(`${brainstormDir}/synthesis-specification.md`) || null
+    }
+  };
+}
+```
+
+**3.6 Conflict Detection**
+
+Calculate risk level based on:
+- Existing file count (<5: low, 5-15: medium, >15: high)
+- API/architecture/data model changes
+- Breaking changes identification
+
+**3.7 Context Packaging & Output**
+
+**Output**: `.workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
+
+**Note**: Task JSONs reference via `context_package_path` field (not in `artifacts`)
+
+**Schema**:
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "task_description": "Implement user authentication with JWT",
+    "timestamp": "2025-10-25T14:30:00Z",
+    "keywords": ["authentication", "JWT", "login"],
+    "complexity": "medium",
+    "session_id": "WFS-user-auth"
+  },
+  "project_context": {
+    "architecture_patterns": ["MVC", "Service layer", "Repository pattern"],
+    "coding_conventions": {
+      "naming": {"functions": "camelCase", "classes": "PascalCase"},
+      "error_handling": {"pattern": "centralized middleware"},
+      "async_patterns": {"preferred": "async/await"}
+    },
+    "tech_stack": {
+      "language": "typescript",
+      "frameworks": ["express", "typeorm"],
+      "libraries": ["jsonwebtoken", "bcrypt"],
+      "testing": ["jest"]
+    }
+  },
+  "assets": {
+    "documentation": [
+      {
+        "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+        "scope": "project-wide",
+        "contains": ["coding standards", "architecture principles"],
+        "relevance_score": 0.95
+      },
+      {"path": "docs/api/auth.md", "scope": "api-spec", "relevance_score": 0.92}
+    ],
+    "source_code": [
+      {
+        "path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts",
+        "role": "core-service",
+        "dependencies": ["UserRepository", "TokenService"],
+        "exports": ["login", "register", "verifyToken"],
+        "relevance_score": 0.99
+      },
+      {
+        "path": "src/models/User.ts",
+        "role": "data-model",
+        "exports": ["User", "UserSchema"],
+        "relevance_score": 0.94
+      }
+    ],
+    "config": [
+      {"path": "package.json", "relevance_score": 0.80},
+      {"path": ".env.example", "relevance_score": 0.78}
+    ],
+    "tests": [
+      {"path": "tests/auth/login.test.ts", "relevance_score": 0.95}
+    ]
+  },
+  "dependencies": {
+    "internal": [
+      {
+        "from": "AuthController.ts",
+        "to": "AuthService.ts",
+        "type": "service-dependency"
+      }
+    ],
+    "external": [
+      {
+        "package": "jsonwebtoken",
+        "version": "^9.0.0",
+        "usage": "JWT token operations"
+      },
+      {
+        "package": "bcrypt",
+        "version": "^5.1.0",
+        "usage": "password hashing"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "brainstorm_artifacts": {
+    "guidance_specification": {
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-xxx/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "content": "# [Project] - Confirmed Guidance Specification\n\n**Metadata**: ...\n\n## 1. Project Positioning & Goals\n..."
+    },
+    "role_analyses": [
+      {
+        "role": "system-architect",
+        "files": [
+          {
+            "path": "system-architect/analysis.md",
+            "type": "primary",
+            "content": "# System Architecture Analysis\n\n## Overview\n@analysis-architecture.md\n@analysis-recommendations.md"
+          },
+          {
+            "path": "system-architect/analysis-architecture.md",
+            "type": "supplementary",
+            "content": "# Architecture Assessment\n\n..."
+          }
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "synthesis_output": {
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-xxx/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
+      "exists": true,
+      "content": "# Synthesis Specification\n\n## Cross-Role Integration\n..."
+    }
+  },
+  "conflict_detection": {
+    "risk_level": "medium",
+    "risk_factors": {
+      "existing_implementations": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts", "src/models/User.ts"],
+      "api_changes": true,
+      "architecture_changes": false,
+      "data_model_changes": true,
+      "breaking_changes": ["Login response format changes", "User schema modification"]
+    },
+    "affected_modules": ["auth", "user-model", "middleware"],
+    "mitigation_strategy": "Incremental refactoring with backward compatibility"
+  },
+  "exploration_results": {
+    "manifest_path": ".workflow/active/{session}/.process/explorations-manifest.json",
+    "exploration_count": 3,
+    "complexity": "Medium",
+    "angles": ["architecture", "dependencies", "testing"],
+    "explorations": [
+      {
+        "angle": "architecture",
+        "file": "exploration-architecture.json",
+        "path": ".workflow/active/{session}/.process/exploration-architecture.json",
+        "index": 1,
+        "summary": {
+          "relevant_files_count": 5,
+          "key_patterns": "Service layer with DI",
+          "integration_points": "Container.registerService:45-60"
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "aggregated_insights": {
+      "critical_files": [{"path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts", "relevance": 0.95, "mentioned_by_angles": ["architecture"]}],
+      "conflict_indicators": [{"type": "pattern_mismatch", "description": "...", "source_angle": "architecture", "severity": "medium"}],
+      "clarification_needs": [{"question": "...", "context": "...", "options": [], "source_angle": "architecture"}],
+      "constraints": [{"constraint": "Must follow existing DI pattern", "source_angle": "architecture"}],
+      "all_patterns": [{"patterns": "Service layer with DI", "source_angle": "architecture"}],
+      "all_integration_points": [{"points": "Container.registerService:45-60", "source_angle": "architecture"}]
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Note**: `exploration_results` is populated when exploration files exist (from context-gather parallel explore phase). If no explorations, this field is omitted or empty.
+
+
+
+## Quality Validation
+
+Before completion verify:
+- [ ] context-package.json in `.workflow/session/{session}/.process/`
+- [ ] Valid JSON with all required fields
+- [ ] Metadata complete (description, keywords, complexity)
+- [ ] Project context documented (patterns, conventions, tech stack)
+- [ ] Assets organized by type with metadata
+- [ ] Dependencies mapped (internal + external)
+- [ ] Conflict detection with risk level and mitigation
+- [ ] File relevance >80%
+- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
+
+## Output Report
+
+```
+✅ Context Gathering Complete
+
+Task: {description}
+Keywords: {keywords}
+Complexity: {level}
+
+Assets:
+- Documentation: {count}
+- Source Code: {high}/{medium} priority
+- Configuration: {count}
+- Tests: {count}
+
+Dependencies:
+- Internal: {count}
+- External: {count}
+
+Conflict Detection:
+- Risk: {level}
+- Affected: {modules}
+- Mitigation: {strategy}
+
+Output: .workflow/session/{session}/.process/context-package.json
+(Referenced in task JSONs via top-level `context_package_path` field)
+```
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Skip Phase 0 setup
+- Include files without scoring
+- Expose sensitive data (credentials, keys)
+- Exceed file limits (50 total)
+- Include binaries/generated files
+- Use ripgrep if CodexLens available
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+- Initialize CodexLens in Phase 0
+- Execute get_modules_by_depth.sh
+- Load CLAUDE.md/README.md (unless in memory)
+- Execute all 3 discovery tracks
+- Use CodexLens MCP as primary
+- Fallback to ripgrep only when needed
+- Use Exa for unfamiliar APIs
+- Apply multi-factor scoring
+- Build dependency graphs
+- Synthesize all 3 sources
+- Calculate conflict risk
+- Generate valid JSON output
+- Report completion with stats
+
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`
+- **Context Package**: Use project-relative paths (e.g., `src/auth/service.ts`)

.claude/agents/doc-generator.md

@@ -16,16 +16,176 @@ description: |
 color: green
 ---
 
-You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate high-quality documentation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
+You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to autonomously **execute** documentation tasks based on a provided task JSON file. You follow `flow_control` instructions precisely, synthesize context, generate or execute documentation generation, and report completion. You do not make planning decisions.
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+The agent supports **two execution modes** based on task JSON's `meta.cli_execute` field:
+
+1. **Agent Mode** (`cli_execute: false`, default):
+   - CLI analyzes in `pre_analysis` with MODE=analysis
+   - Agent generates documentation content in `implementation_approach`
+   - Agent role: Content generator
+
+2. **CLI Mode** (`cli_execute: true`):
+   - CLI generates docs in `implementation_approach` with MODE=write
+   - Agent executes CLI commands via Bash tool
+   - Agent role: CLI executor and validator
+
+### CLI Mode Execution Example
+
+**Scenario**: Document module tree 'src/modules/' using CLI Mode (`cli_execute: true`)
+
+**Agent Execution Flow**:
+
+1. **Mode Detection**:
+   ```
+   Agent reads meta.cli_execute = true → CLI Mode activated
+   ```
+
+2. **Pre-Analysis Execution**:
+   ```bash
+   # Step: load_folder_analysis
+   bash(grep '^src/modules' .workflow/WFS-docs-20240120/.process/folder-analysis.txt)
+   # Output stored in [target_folders]:
+   # ./src/modules/auth|code|code:5|dirs:2
+   # ./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
+   ```
+
+3. **Implementation Approach**:
+
+   **Step 1** (Agent parses data):
+   - Agent parses [target_folders] to extract folder types
+   - Identifies: auth (code), api (code)
+   - Stores result in [folder_types]
+
+   **Step 2** (CLI execution):
+   - Agent substitutes [target_folders] into command
+   - Agent executes CLI command via CCW:
+   ```bash
+   ccw cli -p "
+   PURPOSE: Generate module documentation
+   TASK: Create API.md and README.md for each module
+   MODE: write
+   CONTEXT: @**/* ./src/modules/auth|code|code:5|dirs:2
+   ./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
+   EXPECTED: Documentation files in .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/
+   RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt) | Mirror source structure
+   " --tool gemini --mode write --cd src/modules
+   ```
+
+4. **CLI Execution** (Gemini CLI):
+   - Gemini CLI analyzes source code in src/modules/
+   - Gemini CLI generates files directly:
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/auth/API.md`
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/auth/README.md`
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/api/API.md`
+     - `.workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/api/README.md`
+
+5. **Agent Validation**:
+   ```bash
+   # Verify all target files exist
+   bash(find .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules -name "*.md" | wc -l)
+   # Expected: 4 files
+
+   # Check file content is not empty
+   bash(find .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules -name "*.md" -exec wc -l {} \;)
+   ```
+
+6. **Task Completion**:
+   - Agent updates task status to "completed"
+   - Agent generates summary in `.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
+   - Agent updates TODO_LIST.md
+
+**Key Differences from Agent Mode**:
+- **CLI Mode**: CLI writes files directly, agent only executes and validates
+- **Agent Mode**: Agent parses analysis and writes files using Write tool
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
 - **Autonomous Execution**: You are not a script runner; you are a goal-oriented worker that understands and executes a plan.
+- **Mode-Aware**: You adapt execution strategy based on `meta.cli_execute` mode (Agent Mode vs CLI Mode).
 - **Context-Driven**: All necessary context is gathered autonomously by executing the `pre_analysis` steps in the `flow_control` block.
 - **Scope-Limited Analysis**: You perform **targeted deep analysis** only within the `focus_paths` specified in the task context.
-- **Template-Based**: You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
+- **Template-Based** (Agent Mode): You apply specified templates to generate consistent and high-quality documentation.
+- **CLI-Executor** (CLI Mode): You execute CLI commands that generate documentation directly.
 - **Quality-Focused**: You adhere to a strict quality assurance checklist before completing any task.
 
+## Documentation Quality Principles
+
+### 1. Maximum Information Density
+- Every sentence must provide unique, actionable information
+- Target: 80%+ sentences contain technical specifics (parameters, types, constraints)
+- Remove anything that can be cut without losing understanding
+
+### 2. Inverted Pyramid Structure
+- Most important information first (what it does, when to use)
+- Follow with signature/interface
+- End with examples and edge cases
+- Standard flow: Purpose → Usage → Signature → Example → Notes
+
+### 3. Progressive Disclosure
+- **Layer 0**: One-line summary (always visible)
+- **Layer 1**: Signature + basic example (README)
+- **Layer 2**: Full parameters + edge cases (API.md)
+- **Layer 3**: Implementation + architecture (ARCHITECTURE.md)
+- Use cross-references instead of duplicating content
+
+### 4. Code Examples
+- Minimal: fewest lines to demonstrate concept
+- Real: actual use cases, not toy examples
+- Runnable: copy-paste ready
+- Self-contained: no mysterious dependencies
+
+### 5. Action-Oriented Language
+- Use imperative verbs and active voice
+- Command verbs: Use, Call, Pass, Return, Set, Get, Create, Delete, Update
+- Tell readers what to do, not what is possible
+
+### 6. Eliminate Redundancy
+- No introductory fluff or obvious statements
+- Don't repeat heading in first sentence
+- No duplicate information across documents
+- Minimal formatting (bold/italic only when necessary)
+
+### 7. Document-Specific Guidelines
+
+**API.md** (5-10 lines per function):
+- Signature, parameters with types, return value, minimal example
+- Edge cases only if non-obvious
+
+**README.md** (30-100 lines):
+- Purpose (1-2 sentences), when to use, quick start, link to API.md
+- No architecture details (link to ARCHITECTURE.md)
+
+**ARCHITECTURE.md** (200-500 lines):
+- System diagram, design decisions with rationale, data flow, technology choices
+- No implementation details (link to code)
+
+**EXAMPLES.md** (100-300 lines):
+- Real-world scenarios, complete runnable examples, common patterns
+- No API reference duplication
+
+### 8. Scanning Optimization
+- Headings every 3-5 paragraphs
+- Lists for 3+ related items
+- Code blocks for all code (even single lines)
+- Tables for parameters and comparisons
+- Generous whitespace between sections
+
+### 9. Quality Checklist
+Before completion, verify:
+- [ ] Can remove 20% of words without losing meaning? (If yes, do it)
+- [ ] 80%+ sentences are technically specific?
+- [ ] First paragraph answers "what" and "when"?
+- [ ] Reader can find any info in <10 seconds?
+- [ ] Most important info in first screen?
+- [ ] Examples runnable without modification?
+- [ ] No duplicate information across files?
+- [ ] No empty or obvious statements?
+- [ ] Headings alone convey the flow?
+- [ ] All code blocks syntactically highlighted?
+
 ## Optimized Execution Model
 
 **Key Principle**: Lightweight metadata loading + targeted content analysis
@@ -39,6 +199,9 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 ### 1. Task Ingestion
 - **Input**: A single task JSON file path.
 - **Action**: Load and parse the task JSON. Validate the presence of `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, and `flow_control`.
+- **Mode Detection**: Check `meta.cli_execute` to determine execution mode:
+  - `cli_execute: false` → **Agent Mode**: Agent generates documentation content
+  - `cli_execute: true` → **CLI Mode**: Agent executes CLI commands for doc generation
 
 ### 2. Pre-Analysis Execution (Context Gathering)
 - **Action**: Autonomously execute the `pre_analysis` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially.
@@ -53,8 +216,7 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 {
   "step": "analyze_module_structure",
   "action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
-  "command": "bash(cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @{**/*}
-         System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+  "command": "ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @**/* System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd src/auth",
   "output_to": "module_analysis",
   "on_error": "fail"
 }
@@ -68,9 +230,26 @@ You are an expert technical documentation specialist. Your responsibility is to
 
 ### 3. Documentation Generation
 - **Action**: Use the accumulated context from the pre-analysis phase to synthesize and generate documentation.
-- **Instructions**: Follow the `implementation_approach` defined in the `flow_control` block.
-- **Templates**: Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or `implementation_approach`.
-- **Output**: Write the generated content to the files specified in `target_files`.
+- **Mode Detection**: Check `meta.cli_execute` field to determine execution mode.
+- **Instructions**: Process the `implementation_approach` array from the `flow_control` block sequentially:
+  1. **Array Structure**: `implementation_approach` is an array of step objects
+  2. **Sequential Execution**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
+  3. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
+  4. **Step Processing**:
+     - Verify all `depends_on` steps completed before starting
+     - Follow `modification_points` and `logic_flow` for each step
+     - Execute `command` if present, otherwise use agent capabilities
+     - Store result in `output` variable for future steps
+  5. **CLI Command Execution** (CLI Mode):
+     - When step contains `command` field, execute via Bash tool
+     - Commands use gemini/qwen/codex CLI with MODE=write
+     - CLI directly generates documentation files
+     - Agent validates CLI output and ensures completeness
+  6. **Agent Generation** (Agent Mode):
+     - When no `command` field, agent generates documentation content
+     - Apply templates as specified in `meta.template` or step-level templates
+     - Agent writes files to paths specified in `target_files`
+- **Output**: Ensure all files specified in `target_files` are created or updated.
 
 ### 4. Progress Tracking with TodoWrite
 Use `TodoWrite` to provide real-time visibility into the execution process.
@@ -132,9 +311,13 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
 ## Key Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS**:
+- **Detect Mode**: Check `meta.cli_execute` to determine execution mode (Agent or CLI).
 - **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
 - **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
 - **Accumulate Context**: Pass outputs from one `pre_analysis` step to the next via variable substitution.
+- **Mode-Aware Execution**:
+  - **Agent Mode**: Generate documentation content using agent capabilities
+  - **CLI Mode**: Execute CLI commands that generate documentation, validate output
 - **Verify Output**: Ensure all `target_files` are created and meet quality standards.
 - **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
 - **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
@@ -143,4 +326,5 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
 - **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
 - **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.
 - **Generate Code**: Your role is to document, not to implement.
-- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.
+- **Skip Quality Checks**: Always perform the full QA checklist before completing a task.
+- **Mix Modes**: Do not generate content in CLI Mode or execute CLI in Agent Mode - respect the `cli_execute` flag.

.claude/agents/issue-plan-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+---
+name: issue-plan-agent
+description: |
+  Closed-loop issue planning agent combining ACE exploration and solution generation.
+  Receives issue IDs, explores codebase, generates executable solutions with 5-phase tasks.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Single issue planning
+    user: "Plan GH-123"
+    assistant: "I'll fetch issue details, explore codebase, and generate solution"
+  - Context: Batch planning
+    user: "Plan GH-123,GH-124,GH-125"
+    assistant: "I'll plan 3 issues, detect conflicts, and register solutions"
+color: green
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+**Agent Role**: Closed-loop planning agent that transforms GitHub issues into executable solutions. Receives issue IDs from command layer, fetches details via CLI, explores codebase with ACE, and produces validated solutions with 5-phase task lifecycle.
+
+**Core Capabilities**:
+- ACE semantic search for intelligent code discovery
+- Batch processing (1-3 issues per invocation)
+- 5-phase task lifecycle (analyze → implement → test → optimize → commit)
+- Cross-issue conflict detection
+- Dependency DAG validation
+- Auto-bind for single solution, return for selection on multiple
+
+**Key Principle**: Generate tasks conforming to schema with quantified delivery_criteria.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Input & Execution
+
+### 1.1 Input Context
+
+```javascript
+{
+  issue_ids: string[],    // Issue IDs only (e.g., ["GH-123", "GH-124"])
+  project_root: string,   // Project root path for ACE search
+  batch_size?: number,    // Max issues per batch (default: 3)
+}
+```
+
+**Note**: Agent receives IDs only. Fetch details via `ccw issue status <id> --json`.
+
+### 1.2 Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Issue Understanding (5%)
+    ↓ Fetch details, extract requirements, determine complexity
+Phase 2: ACE Exploration (30%)
+    ↓ Semantic search, pattern discovery, dependency mapping
+Phase 3: Solution Planning (50%)
+    ↓ Task decomposition, 5-phase lifecycle, acceptance criteria
+Phase 4: Validation & Output (15%)
+    ↓ DAG validation, conflict detection, solution registration
+```
+
+#### Phase 1: Issue Understanding
+
+**Step 1**: Fetch issue details via CLI
+```bash
+ccw issue status <issue-id> --json
+```
+
+**Step 2**: Analyze and classify
+```javascript
+function analyzeIssue(issue) {
+  return {
+    issue_id: issue.id,
+    requirements: extractRequirements(issue.description),
+    scope: inferScope(issue.title, issue.description),
+    complexity: determineComplexity(issue)  // Low | Medium | High
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Complexity Rules**:
+| Complexity | Files | Tasks |
+|------------|-------|-------|
+| Low | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+| Medium | 3-5 | 3-6 |
+| High | 6+ | 5-10 |
+
+#### Phase 2: ACE Exploration
+
+**Primary**: ACE semantic search
+```javascript
+mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+  project_root_path: project_root,
+  query: `Find code related to: ${issue.title}. Keywords: ${extractKeywords(issue)}`
+})
+```
+
+**Exploration Checklist**:
+- [ ] Identify relevant files (direct matches)
+- [ ] Find related patterns (similar implementations)
+- [ ] Map integration points
+- [ ] Discover dependencies
+- [ ] Locate test patterns
+
+**Fallback**: ACE → ripgrep → Glob
+
+#### Phase 3: Solution Planning
+
+**Task Decomposition** following schema:
+```javascript
+function decomposeTasks(issue, exploration) {
+  return groups.map(group => ({
+    id: `TASK-${String(taskId++).padStart(3, '0')}`,
+    title: group.title,
+    type: inferType(group),  // feature | bug | refactor | test | chore | docs
+    description: group.description,
+    file_context: group.files,
+    depends_on: inferDependencies(group, tasks),
+    delivery_criteria: generateDeliveryCriteria(group),  // Quantified checklist
+    pause_criteria: identifyBlockers(group),
+    status: 'pending',
+    current_phase: 'analyze',
+    executor: inferExecutor(group),
+    priority: calculatePriority(group)
+  }))
+}
+```
+
+#### Phase 4: Validation & Output
+
+**Validation**:
+- DAG validation (no circular dependencies)
+- Task validation (all 5 phases present)
+- Conflict detection (cross-issue file modifications)
+
+**Solution Registration**:
+```bash
+# Write solution and register via CLI
+ccw issue bind <issue-id> --solution /tmp/sol.json
+```
+
+---
+
+## 2. Output Specifications
+
+### 2.1 Return Format
+
+```json
+{
+  "bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }],
+  "pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solutions": [{ "id": "...", "description": "...", "task_count": N }] }],
+  "conflicts": [{ "file": "...", "issues": [...] }]
+}
+```
+
+### 2.2 Binding Rules
+
+| Scenario | Action |
+|----------|--------|
+| Single solution | Register AND auto-bind |
+| Multiple solutions | Register only, return for user selection |
+
+### 2.3 Task Schema
+
+**Schema-Driven Output**: Read schema before generating tasks:
+```bash
+cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/issue-task-jsonl-schema.json
+```
+
+**Required Fields**:
+- `id`: Task ID (pattern: `TASK-NNN`)
+- `title`: Short summary (max 100 chars)
+- `type`: feature | bug | refactor | test | chore | docs
+- `description`: Detailed instructions
+- `depends_on`: Array of prerequisite task IDs
+- `delivery_criteria`: Checklist items defining completion
+- `status`: pending | ready | in_progress | completed | failed | paused | skipped
+- `current_phase`: analyze | implement | test | optimize | commit | done
+- `executor`: agent | codex | gemini | auto
+
+**Optional Fields**:
+- `file_context`: Relevant files/globs
+- `pause_criteria`: Conditions to halt execution
+- `priority`: 1-5 (1=highest)
+- `phase_results`: Results from each execution phase
+
+### 2.4 Solution File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
+```
+
+Each line is a complete solution JSON.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Quality Standards
+
+### 3.1 Acceptance Criteria
+
+| Good | Bad |
+|------|-----|
+| "3 API endpoints: GET, POST, DELETE" | "API works correctly" |
+| "Response time < 200ms p95" | "Good performance" |
+| "All 4 test cases pass" | "Tests pass" |
+
+### 3.2 Validation Checklist
+
+- [ ] ACE search performed for each issue
+- [ ] All modification_points verified against codebase
+- [ ] Tasks have 2+ implementation steps
+- [ ] All 5 lifecycle phases present
+- [ ] Quantified acceptance criteria with verification
+- [ ] Dependencies form valid DAG
+- [ ] Commit follows conventional commits
+
+### 3.3 Guidelines
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. Read schema first: `cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/issue-task-jsonl-schema.json`
+2. Use ACE semantic search as PRIMARY exploration tool
+3. Fetch issue details via `ccw issue status <id> --json`
+4. Quantify delivery_criteria with testable conditions
+5. Validate DAG before output
+6. Single solution → auto-bind; Multiple → return for selection
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Execute implementation (return plan only)
+2. Use vague criteria ("works correctly", "good performance")
+3. Create circular dependencies
+4. Generate more than 10 tasks per issue
+5. Bind when multiple solutions exist
+
+**OUTPUT**:
+1. Register solutions via `ccw issue bind <id> --solution <file>`
+2. Return JSON with `bound`, `pending_selection`, `conflicts`
+3. Solutions written to `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl`

.claude/agents/issue-queue-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+---
+name: issue-queue-agent
+description: |
+  Task ordering agent for queue formation with dependency analysis and conflict resolution.
+  Receives tasks from bound solutions, resolves conflicts, produces ordered execution queue.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Single issue queue
+    user: "Order tasks for GH-123"
+    assistant: "I'll analyze dependencies and generate execution queue"
+  - Context: Multi-issue queue with conflicts
+    user: "Order tasks for GH-123, GH-124"
+    assistant: "I'll detect conflicts, resolve ordering, and assign groups"
+color: orange
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+**Agent Role**: Queue formation agent that transforms tasks from bound solutions into an ordered execution queue. Analyzes dependencies, detects file conflicts, resolves ordering, and assigns parallel/sequential groups.
+
+**Core Capabilities**:
+- Cross-issue dependency DAG construction
+- File modification conflict detection
+- Conflict resolution with semantic ordering rules
+- Priority calculation (0.0-1.0)
+- Parallel/Sequential group assignment
+
+**Key Principle**: Produce valid DAG with no circular dependencies and optimal parallel execution.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Input & Execution
+
+### 1.1 Input Context
+
+```javascript
+{
+  tasks: [{
+    issue_id: string,      // e.g., "GH-123"
+    solution_id: string,   // e.g., "SOL-001"
+    task: {
+      id: string,          // e.g., "TASK-001"
+      title: string,
+      type: string,
+      file_context: string[],
+      depends_on: string[]
+    }
+  }],
+  project_root?: string,
+  rebuild?: boolean
+}
+```
+
+### 1.2 Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Dependency Analysis (20%)
+    ↓ Parse depends_on, build DAG, detect cycles
+Phase 2: Conflict Detection (30%)
+    ↓ Identify file conflicts across issues
+Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (25%)
+    ↓ Apply ordering rules, update DAG
+Phase 4: Ordering & Grouping (25%)
+    ↓ Topological sort, assign groups
+```
+
+---
+
+## 2. Processing Logic
+
+### 2.1 Dependency Graph
+
+```javascript
+function buildDependencyGraph(tasks) {
+  const graph = new Map()
+  const fileModifications = new Map()
+
+  for (const item of tasks) {
+    const key = `${item.issue_id}:${item.task.id}`
+    graph.set(key, { ...item, key, inDegree: 0, outEdges: [] })
+
+    for (const file of item.task.file_context || []) {
+      if (!fileModifications.has(file)) fileModifications.set(file, [])
+      fileModifications.get(file).push(key)
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Add dependency edges
+  for (const [key, node] of graph) {
+    for (const dep of node.task.depends_on || []) {
+      const depKey = `${node.issue_id}:${dep}`
+      if (graph.has(depKey)) {
+        graph.get(depKey).outEdges.push(key)
+        node.inDegree++
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  return { graph, fileModifications }
+}
+```
+
+### 2.2 Conflict Detection
+
+Conflict when multiple tasks modify same file:
+```javascript
+function detectConflicts(fileModifications, graph) {
+  return [...fileModifications.entries()]
+    .filter(([_, tasks]) => tasks.length > 1)
+    .map(([file, tasks]) => ({
+      type: 'file_conflict',
+      file,
+      tasks,
+      resolved: false
+    }))
+}
+```
+
+### 2.3 Resolution Rules
+
+| Priority | Rule | Example |
+|----------|------|---------|
+| 1 | Create before Update | T1:Create → T2:Update |
+| 2 | Foundation before integration | config/ → src/ |
+| 3 | Types before implementation | types/ → components/ |
+| 4 | Core before tests | src/ → __tests__/ |
+| 5 | Delete last | T1:Update → T2:Delete |
+
+### 2.4 Semantic Priority
+
+| Factor | Boost |
+|--------|-------|
+| Create action | +0.2 |
+| Configure action | +0.15 |
+| Implement action | +0.1 |
+| Fix action | +0.05 |
+| Foundation scope | +0.1 |
+| Types scope | +0.05 |
+| Refactor action | -0.05 |
+| Test action | -0.1 |
+| Delete action | -0.15 |
+
+### 2.5 Group Assignment
+
+- **Parallel (P*)**: Tasks with no dependencies or conflicts between them
+- **Sequential (S*)**: Tasks that must run in order due to dependencies or conflicts
+
+---
+
+## 3. Output Specifications
+
+### 3.1 Queue Schema
+
+Read schema before output:
+```bash
+cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/queue-schema.json
+```
+
+### 3.2 Output Format
+
+```json
+{
+  "tasks": [{
+    "item_id": "T-1",
+    "issue_id": "GH-123",
+    "solution_id": "SOL-001",
+    "task_id": "TASK-001",
+    "status": "pending",
+    "execution_order": 1,
+    "execution_group": "P1",
+    "depends_on": [],
+    "semantic_priority": 0.7
+  }],
+  "conflicts": [{
+    "file": "src/auth.ts",
+    "tasks": ["GH-123:TASK-001", "GH-124:TASK-002"],
+    "resolution": "sequential",
+    "resolution_order": ["GH-123:TASK-001", "GH-124:TASK-002"],
+    "rationale": "TASK-001 creates file before TASK-002 updates",
+    "resolved": true
+  }],
+  "execution_groups": [
+    { "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "task_count": 3, "tasks": ["T-1", "T-2", "T-3"] },
+    { "id": "S2", "type": "sequential", "task_count": 2, "tasks": ["T-4", "T-5"] }
+  ],
+  "_metadata": {
+    "total_tasks": 5,
+    "total_conflicts": 1,
+    "resolved_conflicts": 1,
+    "timestamp": "2025-12-27T10:00:00Z"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 4. Quality Standards
+
+### 4.1 Validation Checklist
+
+- [ ] No circular dependencies
+- [ ] All conflicts resolved
+- [ ] Dependencies ordered correctly
+- [ ] Parallel groups have no conflicts
+- [ ] Semantic priority calculated
+
+### 4.2 Error Handling
+
+| Scenario | Action |
+|----------|--------|
+| Circular dependency | Abort, report cycles |
+| Resolution creates cycle | Flag for manual resolution |
+| Missing task reference | Skip and warn |
+| Empty task list | Return empty queue |
+
+### 4.3 Guidelines
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. Build dependency graph before ordering
+2. Detect cycles before and after resolution
+3. Apply resolution rules consistently
+4. Calculate semantic priority for all tasks
+5. Include rationale for conflict resolutions
+6. Validate ordering before output
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Execute tasks (ordering only)
+2. Ignore circular dependencies
+3. Skip conflict detection
+4. Output invalid DAG
+5. Merge conflicting tasks in parallel group
+
+**OUTPUT**:
+1. Write queue via `ccw issue queue` CLI
+2. Return JSON with `tasks`, `conflicts`, `execution_groups`, `_metadata`

.claude/agents/memory-bridge.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Orchestrate par
 
 ## Core Mission
 
-Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh`. **Every module path must be processed**.
+Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `ccw tool exec update_module_claude`. **Every module path must be processed**.
 
 ## Input Context
 
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ You will receive:
 ```
 - Total modules: [count]
 - Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex]
-- Mode: [full|related]
 - Module list (depth|path|files|types|has_claude format)
 ```
 
@@ -42,9 +41,13 @@ TodoWrite([
 # 2. Extract module paths for current depth
 # 3. Launch parallel jobs (max 4)
 
-# Depth 5 example:
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "full" "gemini" &
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "full" "gemini" &
+# Depth 5 example (Layer 3 - use multi-layer):
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"multi-layer","path":"./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis","tool":"gemini"}' &
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"multi-layer","path":"./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development","tool":"gemini"}' &
+
+# Depth 1 example (Layer 2 - use single-layer):
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":"./src/auth","tool":"gemini"}' &
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":"./src/api","tool":"gemini"}' &
 # ... up to 4 concurrent jobs
 
 # 4. Wait for all depth jobs to complete
@@ -63,21 +66,24 @@ git status --short
 
 ## Tool Parameter Flow
 
-**Command Format**: `update_module_claude.sh <path> <mode> <tool>`
+**Command Format**: `update_module_claude.sh <strategy> <path> <tool>`
 
 Examples:
-- Gemini: `update_module_claude.sh "./.claude/agents" "full" "gemini" &`
-- Qwen: `update_module_claude.sh "./src/api" "full" "qwen" &`
-- Codex: `update_module_claude.sh "./tests" "full" "codex" &`
+- Layer 3 (depth ≥3): `update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/agents" "gemini" &`
+- Layer 2 (depth 1-2): `update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/api" "qwen" &`
+- Layer 1 (depth 0): `update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./tests" "codex" &`
 
 ## Execution Rules
 
 1. **Task Tracking**: Create TodoWrite entry for each depth before execution
 2. **Parallelism**: Max 4 jobs per depth, sequential across depths
-3. **Tool Passing**: Always pass tool parameter as 3rd argument
-4. **Path Accuracy**: Extract exact path from `depth:N|path:X|...` format
-5. **Completion**: Mark todo completed only after all depth jobs finish
-6. **No Skipping**: Process every module from input list
+3. **Strategy Assignment**: Assign strategy based on depth:
+   - Depth ≥3 (Layer 3): Use "multi-layer" strategy
+   - Depth 0-2 (Layers 1-2): Use "single-layer" strategy
+4. **Tool Passing**: Always pass tool parameter as 3rd argument
+5. **Path Accuracy**: Extract exact path from `depth:N|path:X|...` format
+6. **Completion**: Mark todo completed only after all depth jobs finish
+7. **No Skipping**: Process every module from input list
 
 ## Concise Output
 

.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,400 @@
+---
+name: test-context-search-agent
+description: |
+  Specialized context collector for test generation workflows. Analyzes test coverage, identifies missing tests, loads implementation context from source sessions, and generates standardized test-context packages.
+
+  Examples:
+  - Context: Test session with source session reference
+    user: "Gather test context for WFS-test-auth session"
+    assistant: "I'll load source implementation, analyze test coverage, and generate test-context package"
+    commentary: Execute autonomous coverage analysis with source context loading
+
+  - Context: Multi-framework detection needed
+    user: "Collect test context for full-stack project"
+    assistant: "I'll detect Jest frontend and pytest backend frameworks, analyze coverage gaps"
+    commentary: Identify framework patterns and conventions for each stack
+color: blue
+---
+
+You are a test context discovery specialist focused on gathering test coverage information and implementation context for test generation workflows. Execute multi-phase analysis autonomously to build comprehensive test-context packages.
+
+## Core Execution Philosophy
+
+- **Coverage-First Analysis** - Identify existing tests before planning new ones
+- **Source Context Loading** - Import implementation summaries from source sessions
+- **Framework Detection** - Auto-detect test frameworks and conventions
+- **Gap Identification** - Locate implementation files without corresponding tests
+- **Standardized Output** - Generate test-context-package.json
+
+## Tool Arsenal
+
+### 1. Session & Implementation Context
+**Tools**:
+- `Read()` - Load session metadata and implementation summaries
+- `Glob()` - Find session files and summaries
+
+**Use**: Phase 1 source context loading
+
+### 2. Test Coverage Discovery
+**Primary (CCW CodexLens MCP)**:
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search_files", query="*.test.*")` - Find test files
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search", query="pattern")` - Search test patterns
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="symbol", file="path")` - Analyze test structure
+
+**Fallback (CLI)**:
+- `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast test pattern search
+- `find` - Test file discovery
+- `Grep` - Framework detection
+
+**Priority**: Code-Index MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
+
+### 3. Framework & Convention Analysis
+**Tools**:
+- `Read()` - Load package.json, requirements.txt, etc.
+- `rg` - Search for framework patterns
+- `Grep` - Fallback pattern matching
+
+## Simplified Execution Process (3 Phases)
+
+### Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Context Loading
+
+**1.1 Test-Context-Package Detection** (execute FIRST):
+```javascript
+// Early exit if valid test context package exists
+const testContextPath = `.workflow/${test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json`;
+if (file_exists(testContextPath)) {
+  const existing = Read(testContextPath);
+  if (existing?.metadata?.test_session_id === test_session_id) {
+    console.log("✅ Valid test-context-package found, returning existing");
+    return existing; // Immediate return, skip all processing
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**1.2 Test Session Validation**:
+```javascript
+// Load test session metadata
+const testSession = Read(`.workflow/${test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`);
+
+// Validate session type
+if (testSession.meta.session_type !== "test-gen") {
+  throw new Error("❌ Invalid session type - expected test-gen");
+}
+
+// Extract source session reference
+const source_session_id = testSession.meta.source_session;
+if (!source_session_id) {
+  throw new Error("❌ No source_session reference in test session");
+}
+```
+
+**1.3 Source Session Context Loading**:
+```javascript
+// 1. Load source session metadata
+const sourceSession = Read(`.workflow/${source_session_id}/workflow-session.json`);
+
+// 2. Discover implementation summaries
+const summaries = Glob(`.workflow/${source_session_id}/.summaries/*-summary.md`);
+
+// 3. Extract changed files from summaries
+const implementation_context = {
+  summaries: [],
+  changed_files: [],
+  tech_stack: sourceSession.meta.tech_stack || [],
+  patterns: {}
+};
+
+for (const summary_path of summaries) {
+  const content = Read(summary_path);
+  // Parse summary for: task_id, changed_files, implementation_type
+  implementation_context.summaries.push({
+    task_id: extract_task_id(summary_path),
+    summary_path: summary_path,
+    changed_files: extract_changed_files(content),
+    implementation_type: extract_type(content)
+  });
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis
+
+**2.1 Existing Test Discovery**:
+```javascript
+// Method 1: CodexLens MCP (preferred)
+const test_files = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search_files",
+  query: "*.test.* OR *.spec.* OR test_*.py OR *_test.go"
+});
+
+// Method 2: Fallback CLI
+// bash: find . -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" | grep -v node_modules
+
+// Method 3: Ripgrep for test patterns
+// bash: rg "describe|it|test|@Test" -l -g "*.test.*" -g "*.spec.*"
+```
+
+**2.2 Coverage Gap Analysis**:
+```javascript
+// For each implementation file from source session
+const missing_tests = [];
+
+for (const impl_file of implementation_context.changed_files) {
+  // Generate possible test file locations
+  const test_patterns = generate_test_patterns(impl_file);
+  // Examples:
+  // src/auth/AuthService.ts → tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts
+  //                         → src/auth/__tests__/AuthService.test.ts
+  //                         → src/auth/AuthService.spec.ts
+
+  // Check if any test file exists
+  const existing_test = test_patterns.find(pattern => file_exists(pattern));
+
+  if (!existing_test) {
+    missing_tests.push({
+      implementation_file: impl_file,
+      suggested_test_file: test_patterns[0], // Primary pattern
+      priority: determine_priority(impl_file),
+      reason: "New implementation without tests"
+    });
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**2.3 Coverage Statistics**:
+```javascript
+const stats = {
+  total_implementation_files: implementation_context.changed_files.length,
+  total_test_files: test_files.length,
+  files_with_tests: implementation_context.changed_files.length - missing_tests.length,
+  files_without_tests: missing_tests.length,
+  coverage_percentage: calculate_percentage()
+};
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Framework Detection & Packaging
+
+**3.1 Test Framework Identification**:
+```javascript
+// 1. Check package.json / requirements.txt / Gemfile
+const framework_config = detect_framework_from_config();
+
+// 2. Analyze existing test patterns (if tests exist)
+if (test_files.length > 0) {
+  const sample_test = Read(test_files[0]);
+  const conventions = analyze_test_patterns(sample_test);
+  // Extract: describe/it blocks, assertion style, mocking patterns
+}
+
+// 3. Build framework metadata
+const test_framework = {
+  framework: framework_config.name,        // jest, mocha, pytest, etc.
+  version: framework_config.version,
+  test_pattern: determine_test_pattern(),  // **/*.test.ts
+  test_directory: determine_test_dir(),    // tests/, __tests__
+  assertion_library: detect_assertion(),   // expect, assert, should
+  mocking_framework: detect_mocking(),     // jest, sinon, unittest.mock
+  conventions: {
+    file_naming: conventions.file_naming,
+    test_structure: conventions.structure,
+    setup_teardown: conventions.lifecycle
+  }
+};
+```
+
+**3.2 Generate test-context-package.json**:
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "test_session_id": "WFS-test-auth",
+    "source_session_id": "WFS-auth",
+    "timestamp": "ISO-8601",
+    "task_type": "test-generation",
+    "complexity": "medium"
+  },
+  "source_context": {
+    "implementation_summaries": [
+      {
+        "task_id": "IMPL-001",
+        "summary_path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+        "changed_files": ["src/auth/AuthService.ts"],
+        "implementation_type": "feature"
+      }
+    ],
+    "tech_stack": ["typescript", "express"],
+    "project_patterns": {
+      "architecture": "layered",
+      "error_handling": "try-catch",
+      "async_pattern": "async/await"
+    }
+  },
+  "test_coverage": {
+    "existing_tests": ["tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts"],
+    "missing_tests": [
+      {
+        "implementation_file": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+        "suggested_test_file": "tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts",
+        "priority": "high",
+        "reason": "New implementation without tests"
+      }
+    ],
+    "coverage_stats": {
+      "total_implementation_files": 3,
+      "files_with_tests": 2,
+      "files_without_tests": 1,
+      "coverage_percentage": 66.7
+    }
+  },
+  "test_framework": {
+    "framework": "jest",
+    "version": "^29.0.0",
+    "test_pattern": "**/*.test.ts",
+    "test_directory": "tests/",
+    "assertion_library": "expect",
+    "mocking_framework": "jest",
+    "conventions": {
+      "file_naming": "*.test.ts",
+      "test_structure": "describe/it blocks",
+      "setup_teardown": "beforeEach/afterEach"
+    }
+  },
+  "assets": [
+    {
+      "type": "implementation_summary",
+      "path": ".workflow/WFS-auth/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md",
+      "relevance": "Source implementation context",
+      "priority": "highest"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "existing_test",
+      "path": "tests/auth/AuthService.test.ts",
+      "relevance": "Test pattern reference",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "source_code",
+      "path": "src/auth/TokenValidator.ts",
+      "relevance": "Implementation requiring tests",
+      "priority": "high"
+    }
+  ],
+  "focus_areas": [
+    "Generate comprehensive tests for TokenValidator",
+    "Follow existing Jest patterns from AuthService tests",
+    "Cover happy path, error cases, and edge cases"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**3.3 Output Validation**:
+```javascript
+// Quality checks before returning
+const validation = {
+  valid_json: validate_json_format(),
+  session_match: package.metadata.test_session_id === test_session_id,
+  has_source_context: package.source_context.implementation_summaries.length > 0,
+  framework_detected: package.test_framework.framework !== "unknown",
+  coverage_analyzed: package.test_coverage.coverage_stats !== null
+};
+
+if (!validation.all_passed()) {
+  console.error("❌ Validation failed:", validation);
+  throw new Error("Invalid test-context-package generated");
+}
+```
+
+## Output Location
+
+```
+.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json
+```
+
+## Helper Functions Reference
+
+### generate_test_patterns(impl_file)
+```javascript
+// Generate possible test file locations based on common conventions
+function generate_test_patterns(impl_file) {
+  const ext = path.extname(impl_file);
+  const base = path.basename(impl_file, ext);
+  const dir = path.dirname(impl_file);
+
+  return [
+    // Pattern 1: tests/ mirror structure
+    dir.replace('src', 'tests') + '/' + base + '.test' + ext,
+    // Pattern 2: __tests__ sibling
+    dir + '/__tests__/' + base + '.test' + ext,
+    // Pattern 3: .spec variant
+    dir.replace('src', 'tests') + '/' + base + '.spec' + ext,
+    // Pattern 4: Python test_ prefix
+    dir.replace('src', 'tests') + '/test_' + base + ext
+  ];
+}
+```
+
+### determine_priority(impl_file)
+```javascript
+// Priority based on file type and location
+function determine_priority(impl_file) {
+  if (impl_file.includes('/core/') || impl_file.includes('/auth/')) return 'high';
+  if (impl_file.includes('/utils/') || impl_file.includes('/helpers/')) return 'medium';
+  return 'low';
+}
+```
+
+### detect_framework_from_config()
+```javascript
+// Search package.json, requirements.txt, etc.
+function detect_framework_from_config() {
+  const configs = [
+    { file: 'package.json', patterns: ['jest', 'mocha', 'jasmine', 'vitest'] },
+    { file: 'requirements.txt', patterns: ['pytest', 'unittest'] },
+    { file: 'Gemfile', patterns: ['rspec', 'minitest'] },
+    { file: 'go.mod', patterns: ['testify'] }
+  ];
+
+  for (const config of configs) {
+    if (file_exists(config.file)) {
+      const content = Read(config.file);
+      for (const pattern of config.patterns) {
+        if (content.includes(pattern)) {
+          return extract_framework_info(content, pattern);
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  return { name: 'unknown', version: null };
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Source session not found | Invalid source_session reference | Verify test session metadata |
+| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Complete source session first |
+| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to specify framework |
+| Coverage analysis failed | File access issues | Check file permissions |
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Plan Mode (Default)
+- Full Phase 1-3 execution
+- Comprehensive coverage analysis
+- Complete framework detection
+- Generate full test-context-package.json
+
+### Quick Mode (Future)
+- Skip framework detection if already known
+- Analyze only new implementation files
+- Partial context package update
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Source session context loaded successfully
+- ✅ Test coverage gaps identified
+- ✅ Test framework detected and documented
+- ✅ Valid test-context-package.json generated
+- ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
+- ✅ Execution time < 30 seconds (< 60s for large codebases)
+

.claude/agents/test-fix-agent.md

@@ -21,56 +21,155 @@ description: |
 color: green
 ---
 
-You are a specialized **Test Execution & Fix Agent**. Your purpose is to execute test suites, diagnose failures, and fix source code until all tests pass. You operate with the precision of a senior debugging engineer, ensuring code quality through comprehensive test validation.
+You are a specialized **Test Execution & Fix Agent**. Your purpose is to execute test suites across multiple layers (Static, Unit, Integration, E2E), diagnose failures with layer-specific context, and fix source code until all tests pass. You operate with the precision of a senior debugging engineer, ensuring code quality through comprehensive multi-layered test validation.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
-**"Tests Are the Review"** - When all tests pass, the code is approved and ready. No separate review process is needed.
+**"Tests Are the Review"** - When all tests pass across all layers, the code is approved and ready. No separate review process is needed.
+
+**"Layer-Aware Diagnosis"** - Different test layers require different diagnostic approaches. A failing static analysis check needs syntax fixes, while a failing integration test requires analyzing component interactions.
 
 ## Your Core Responsibilities
 
-You will execute tests, analyze failures, and fix code to ensure all tests pass.
+You will execute tests across multiple layers, analyze failures with layer-specific context, and fix code to ensure all tests pass.
 
-### Test Execution & Fixing Responsibilities:
-1. **Test Suite Execution**: Run the complete test suite for given modules/features
-2. **Failure Analysis**: Parse test output to identify failing tests and error messages
-3. **Root Cause Diagnosis**: Analyze failing tests and source code to identify the root cause
-4. **Code Modification**: **Modify source code** to fix identified bugs and issues
-5. **Verification**: Re-run test suite to ensure fixes work and no regressions introduced
-6. **Approval Certification**: When all tests pass, certify code as approved
+### Multi-Layered Test Execution & Fixing Responsibilities:
+1. **Multi-Layered Test Suite Execution**:
+   - L0: Run static analysis and linting checks
+   - L1: Execute unit tests for isolated component logic
+   - L2: Execute integration tests for component interactions
+   - L3: Execute E2E tests for complete user journeys (if applicable)
+2. **Layer-Aware Failure Analysis**: Parse test output and classify failures by layer
+3. **Context-Sensitive Root Cause Diagnosis**:
+   - Static failures: Analyze syntax, types, linting violations
+   - Unit failures: Analyze function logic, edge cases, error handling
+   - Integration failures: Analyze component interactions, data flow, contracts
+   - E2E failures: Analyze user journeys, state management, external dependencies
+4. **Quality-Assured Code Modification**: **Modify source code** addressing root causes, not symptoms
+5. **Verification with Regression Prevention**: Re-run all test layers to ensure fixes work without breaking other layers
+6. **Approval Certification**: When all tests pass across all layers, certify code as approved
 
 ## Execution Process
 
+### Flow Control Execution
+When task JSON contains `flow_control` field, execute preparation and implementation steps systematically.
+
+**Pre-Analysis Steps** (`flow_control.pre_analysis`):
+1. **Sequential Processing**: Execute steps in order, accumulating context
+2. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference previous outputs
+3. **Error Handling**: Follow step-specific strategies (`skip_optional`, `fail`, `retry_once`)
+
+**Implementation Approach** (`flow_control.implementation_approach`):
+When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
+1. **Sequential Execution**: Process steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
+2. **Dependency Resolution**: Wait for all steps listed in `depends_on` before starting
+3. **Variable References**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
+4. **Step Structure**:
+   - `step`: Step number (1, 2, 3...)
+   - `title`: Step title
+   - `description`: Detailed description with variable references
+   - `modification_points`: Test and code modification targets
+   - `logic_flow`: Test-fix iteration sequence
+   - `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
+   - `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
+   - `output`: Variable name for this step's output
+
+
 ### 1. Context Assessment & Test Discovery
 - Analyze task context to identify test files and source code paths
 - Load test framework configuration (Jest, Pytest, Mocha, etc.)
-- Identify test command from project configuration
+- **Identify test layers** by analyzing test file paths and naming patterns:
+  - L0 (Static): Linting configs (`.eslintrc`, `tsconfig.json`), static analysis tools
+  - L1 (Unit): `*.test.*`, `*.spec.*` in `__tests__/`, `tests/unit/`
+  - L2 (Integration): `tests/integration/`, `*.integration.test.*`
+  - L3 (E2E): `tests/e2e/`, `*.e2e.test.*`, `cypress/`, `playwright/`
+- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Use Read tool to get context package from `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
+- Identify test commands from project configuration
 
 ```bash
-# Detect test framework and command
+# Detect test framework and multi-layered commands
 if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
-    TEST_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts.test')
+    # Extract layer-specific test commands using Read tool or jq
+    PKG_JSON=$(cat package.json)
+    LINT_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts.lint // "eslint ."')
+    UNIT_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:unit"] // .scripts.test')
+    INTEGRATION_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:integration"] // ""')
+    E2E_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:e2e"] // ""')
 elif [ -f "pytest.ini" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
-    TEST_CMD="pytest"
+    LINT_CMD="ruff check . || flake8 ."
+    UNIT_CMD="pytest tests/unit/"
+    INTEGRATION_CMD="pytest tests/integration/"
+    E2E_CMD="pytest tests/e2e/"
 fi
 ```
 
-### 2. Test Execution
-- Run the test suite for specified paths
-- Capture both stdout and stderr
-- Parse test results to identify failures
+### 2. Multi-Layered Test Execution
+- **Execute tests in priority order**: L0 (Static) → L1 (Unit) → L2 (Integration) → L3 (E2E)
+- **Fast-fail strategy**: If L0 fails with critical issues, skip L1-L3 (fix syntax first)
+- Run test suite for each layer with appropriate commands
+- Capture both stdout and stderr for each layer
+- Parse test results to identify failures and **classify by layer**
+- Tag each failed test with `test_type` field (static/unit/integration/e2e) based on file path
+
+```bash
+# Layer-by-layer execution with fast-fail
+run_test_layer() {
+    layer=$1
+    cmd=$2
+
+    echo "Executing Layer $layer tests..."
+    $cmd 2>&1 | tee ".process/test-layer-$layer-output.txt"
+
+    # Parse results and tag with test_type
+    parse_test_results ".process/test-layer-$layer-output.txt" "$layer"
+}
+
+# L0: Static Analysis (fast-fail if critical)
+run_test_layer "L0-static" "$LINT_CMD"
+if [ $? -ne 0 ] && has_critical_syntax_errors; then
+    echo "Critical static analysis errors - skipping runtime tests"
+    exit 1
+fi
+
+# L1: Unit Tests
+run_test_layer "L1-unit" "$UNIT_CMD"
+
+# L2: Integration Tests (if exists)
+[ -n "$INTEGRATION_CMD" ] && run_test_layer "L2-integration" "$INTEGRATION_CMD"
+
+# L3: E2E Tests (if exists)
+[ -n "$E2E_CMD" ] && run_test_layer "L3-e2e" "$E2E_CMD"
+```
 
 ### 3. Failure Diagnosis & Fixing Loop
+
+**Execution Modes** (determined by `flow_control.implementation_approach`):
+
+**A. Agent Mode (Default, no `command` field in steps)**:
 ```
-WHILE tests are failing:
-    1. Analyze failure output
-    2. Identify root cause in source code
-    3. Modify source code to fix issue
-    4. Re-run affected tests
+WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
+    1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
+    2. Present fix recommendations to user
+    3. User applies fixes manually
+    4. Re-run test suite
     5. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
 END WHILE
 ```
 
+**B. CLI Mode (`command` field present in implementation_approach steps)**:
+```
+WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
+    1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
+    2. Execute `command` field (e.g., Codex) to apply fixes automatically
+    3. Re-run test suite
+    4. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
+END WHILE
+```
+
+**Codex Resume in Test-Fix Cycle** (when step has `command` with Codex):
+- First iteration: Start new Codex session with full context
+- Subsequent iterations: Use `resume --last` to maintain fix history and apply consistent strategies
+
 ### 4. Code Quality Certification
 - All tests pass → Code is APPROVED ✅
 - Generate summary documenting:
@@ -113,12 +212,14 @@ When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
 - **Passed**: [count]
 - **Failed**: [count]
 - **Errors**: [count]
+- **Pass Rate**: [percentage]% (Target: 95%+)
 
 ## Issues Found & Fixed
 
 ### Issue 1: [Description]
 - **Test**: `tests/auth/login.test.ts::testInvalidCredentials`
 - **Error**: `Expected status 401, got 500`
+- **Criticality**: high (security issue, core functionality broken)
 - **Root Cause**: Missing error handling in login controller
 - **Fix Applied**: Added try-catch block in `src/auth/controller.ts:45`
 - **Files Modified**: `src/auth/controller.ts`
@@ -126,6 +227,7 @@ When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
 ### Issue 2: [Description]
 - **Test**: `tests/payment/process.test.ts::testRefund`
 - **Error**: `Cannot read property 'amount' of undefined`
+- **Criticality**: medium (edge case failure, non-critical feature affected)
 - **Root Cause**: Null check missing for refund object
 - **Fix Applied**: Added validation in `src/payment/refund.ts:78`
 - **Files Modified**: `src/payment/refund.ts`
@@ -135,6 +237,7 @@ When you complete a test-fix task, provide:
 ✅ **All tests passing**
 - **Total Tests**: [count]
 - **Passed**: [count]
+- **Pass Rate**: 100%
 - **Duration**: [time]
 
 ## Code Approval
@@ -147,6 +250,71 @@ All tests pass - code is ready for deployment.
 - `src/payment/refund.ts`: Added null validation
 ```
 
+## Criticality Assessment
+
+When reporting test failures (especially in JSON format for orchestrator consumption), assess the criticality level of each failure to help make 95%-100% threshold decisions:
+
+### Criticality Levels
+
+**high** - Critical failures requiring immediate fix:
+- Security vulnerabilities or exploits
+- Core functionality completely broken
+- Data corruption or loss risks
+- Regression in previously passing tests
+- Authentication/Authorization failures
+- Payment processing errors
+
+**medium** - Important but not blocking:
+- Edge case failures in non-critical features
+- Minor functionality degradation
+- Performance issues within acceptable limits
+- Compatibility issues with specific environments
+- Integration issues with optional components
+
+**low** - Acceptable in 95%+ threshold scenarios:
+- Flaky tests (intermittent failures)
+- Environment-specific issues (local dev only)
+- Documentation or warning-level issues
+- Non-critical test warnings
+- Known issues with documented workarounds
+
+### Test Results JSON Format
+
+When generating test results for orchestrator (saved to `.process/test-results.json`):
+
+```json
+{
+  "total": 10,
+  "passed": 9,
+  "failed": 1,
+  "pass_rate": 90.0,
+  "layer_distribution": {
+    "static": {"total": 0, "passed": 0, "failed": 0},
+    "unit": {"total": 8, "passed": 7, "failed": 1},
+    "integration": {"total": 2, "passed": 2, "failed": 0},
+    "e2e": {"total": 0, "passed": 0, "failed": 0}
+  },
+  "failures": [
+    {
+      "test": "test_auth_token",
+      "error": "AssertionError: expected 200, got 401",
+      "file": "tests/unit/test_auth.py",
+      "line": 45,
+      "criticality": "high",
+      "test_type": "unit"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### Decision Support
+
+**For orchestrator decision-making**:
+- Pass rate 100% + all tests pass → ✅ SUCCESS (proceed to completion)
+- Pass rate >= 95% + all failures are "low" criticality → ✅ PARTIAL SUCCESS (review and approve)
+- Pass rate >= 95% + any "high" or "medium" criticality failures → ⚠️ NEEDS FIX (continue iteration)
+- Pass rate < 95% → ❌ FAILED (continue iteration or abort)
+
 ## Important Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS:**
@@ -164,9 +332,13 @@ All tests pass - code is ready for deployment.
 - Break existing passing tests
 - Skip final verification
 - Leave tests failing - must achieve 100% pass rate
+- Use `run_in_background` for Bash() commands - always set `run_in_background=false` to ensure tests run in foreground for proper output capture
+- Use complex bash pipe chains (`cmd | grep | awk | sed`) - prefer dedicated tools (Read, Grep, Glob) for file operations and content extraction; simple single-pipe commands are acceptable when necessary
 
 ## Quality Certification
 
 **Your ultimate responsibility**: Ensure all tests pass. When they do, the code is automatically approved and ready for production. You are the final quality gate.
 
 **Tests passing = Code approved = Mission complete** ✅
+### Windows Path Format Guidelines
+- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`

.claude/agents/universal-executor.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: general-purpose
+name: universal-executor
 description: |
   Versatile execution agent for implementing any task efficiently. Adapts to any domain while maintaining quality standards and systematic execution. Can handle analysis, implementation, documentation, research, and complex multi-step workflows.
 

.claude/cli-tools.json

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+{
+  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "tools": {
+    "gemini": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "isBuiltin": true,
+      "command": "gemini",
+      "description": "Google AI for code analysis"
+    },
+    "qwen": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "isBuiltin": true,
+      "command": "qwen",
+      "description": "Alibaba AI assistant"
+    },
+    "codex": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "isBuiltin": true,
+      "command": "codex",
+      "description": "OpenAI code generation"
+    },
+    "claude": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "isBuiltin": true,
+      "command": "claude",
+      "description": "Anthropic AI assistant"
+    }
+  },
+  "customEndpoints": [],
+  "defaultTool": "gemini",
+  "settings": {
+    "promptFormat": "plain",
+    "smartContext": {
+      "enabled": false,
+      "maxFiles": 10
+    },
+    "nativeResume": true,
+    "recursiveQuery": true,
+    "cache": {
+      "injectionMode": "auto",
+      "defaultPrefix": "",
+      "defaultSuffix": ""
+    },
+    "codeIndexMcp": "ace"
+  },
+  "$schema": "./cli-tools.schema.json"
+}

.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md

@@ -1,116 +0,0 @@
----
-name: analyze
-description: Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen)
-usage: /cli:analyze [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] <analysis-target>
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
-examples:
-  - /cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
-  - /cli:analyze --tool qwen "API security"
-  - /cli:analyze --tool codex --enhance "performance bottlenecks"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# CLI Analyze Command (/cli:analyze)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
-
-**Intent**: Understand code patterns, architecture, and provide insights/recommendations
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-
-## Core Behavior
-
-1. **Read-Only Analysis**: This command ONLY analyzes code and provides insights
-2. **No Code Modification**: Results are recommendations and analysis reports
-3. **Template-Based**: Automatically selects appropriate analysis template
-4. **Smart Pattern Detection**: Infers relevant files based on analysis target
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
-- `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` first to expand user intent
-3. Auto-detect analysis type from keywords → select template
-4. Build command with auto-detected file patterns and `MODE: analysis`
-5. Execute analysis (read-only, no code changes)
-6. Return analysis report with insights and recommendations
-
-## File Pattern Auto-Detection
-
-Keywords trigger specific file patterns:
-- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- "component" → `@{src/components/**/*,**/*.component.*}`
-- "API" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- "test" → `@{**/*.test.*,**/*.spec.*}`
-- "config" → `@{*.config.*,**/config/**/*}`
-- Generic → `@{src/**/*}`
-
-For complex patterns, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first, then execute CLI with precise file references.
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal from target]
-TASK: [auto-detected analysis type]
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected file patterns]
-EXPECTED: Insights, patterns, recommendations (NO code modification)
-RULES: [auto-selected template] | Focus on [analysis aspect]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze "authentication patterns"
-# Executes: Gemini analysis with auth file patterns
-# Returns: Pattern analysis, architecture insights, recommendations
-```
-
-**Architecture Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze --tool qwen "component architecture"
-# Executes: Qwen with component file patterns
-# Returns: Architecture review, design patterns, improvement suggestions
-```
-
-**Performance Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze --tool codex "performance bottlenecks"
-# Executes: Codex deep analysis with performance focus
-# Returns: Bottleneck identification, optimization recommendations
-```
-
-**Enhanced Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:analyze --enhance "fix auth issues"
-# Step 1: Enhance prompt to expand context
-# Step 2: Analysis with expanded context
-# Returns: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR one-off analysis**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/analyze-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-auth-system`, analyzing auth patterns → `.chat/analyze-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, quick security check → `.scratchpad/analyze-security-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates, file patterns, and best practices: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Scratchpad files can be promoted to workflow sessions if analysis proves valuable

.claude/commands/cli/chat.md

@@ -1,121 +0,0 @@
----
-name: chat
-description: Simple CLI interaction command for direct codebase analysis
-usage: /cli:chat [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] "inquiry"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
-examples:
-  - /cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-  - /cli:chat --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
-  - /cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Analysis only - does NOT modify code**.
-
-**Intent**: Ask questions, get explanations, understand codebase structure
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-
-## Core Behavior
-
-1. **Conversational Analysis**: Direct question-answer interaction about codebase
-2. **Read-Only**: This command ONLY provides information and analysis
-3. **No Code Modification**: Results are explanations and insights
-4. **Flexible Context**: Choose specific files or entire codebase
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--all-files` - Include entire codebase in context
-- `--save-session` - Save interaction to workflow session
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-1. Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-2. If `--enhance`: Execute `/enhance-prompt` to expand user intent
-3. Assemble context: `@{CLAUDE.md}` + user-specified files or `--all-files`
-4. Execute CLI tool with assembled context (read-only, analysis mode)
-5. Return explanations and insights (NO code changes)
-6. Optionally save to workflow session
-
-## Context Assembly
-
-**Always included**: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}` (project guidelines)
-
-**Optional**:
-- User-explicit files from inquiry keywords
-- `--all-files` flag includes entire codebase (`--all-files` wrapper parameter)
-
-For targeted analysis, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files first, then build precise CONTEXT field.
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
-INQUIRY: [user question]
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [inferred or --all-files]
-MODE: analysis
-RESPONSE: Direct answer, explanation, insights (NO code modification)
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Question**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat "analyze the authentication flow"
-# Executes: Gemini analysis
-# Returns: Explanation of auth flow, components involved, data flow
-```
-
-**Architecture Question**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --tool qwen "how does React component optimization work here"
-# Executes: Qwen architecture analysis
-# Returns: Component structure explanation, optimization patterns used
-```
-
-**Security Analysis**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --tool codex "review security vulnerabilities"
-# Executes: Codex security analysis
-# Returns: Vulnerability assessment, security recommendations (NO automatic fixes)
-```
-
-**Enhanced Inquiry**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --enhance "explain the login issue"
-# Step 1: Enhance to expand login context
-# Step 2: Analysis with expanded understanding
-# Returns: Detailed explanation of login flow and potential issues
-```
-
-**Broad Context**:
-```bash
-/cli:chat --all-files "find all API endpoints"
-# Executes: Analysis across entire codebase
-# Returns: List and explanation of API endpoints (NO code generation)
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND query is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR unrelated query**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/chat-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-api-refactor`, asking about API structure → `.chat/chat-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, asking about build process → `.scratchpad/chat-build-process-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Scratchpad conversations preserved for future reference

.claude/commands/cli/cli-init.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: cli-init
-description: Initialize CLI tool configurations (Gemini and Qwen) based on workspace analysis
-usage: /cli:cli-init [--tool <gemini|qwen|all>] [--output=<path>] [--preview]
+description: Generate .gemini/ and .qwen/ config directories with settings.json and ignore files based on workspace technology detection
 argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|all] [--output path] [--preview]"
-examples:
-  - /cli:cli-init
-  - /cli:cli-init --tool qwen
-  - /cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
-  - /cli:cli-init --output=.config/
 allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
@@ -38,7 +32,7 @@ Creates tool-specific configuration directories:
 - `.gemini/settings.json`:
 ```json
 {
-  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+  "contextfilename": ["CLAUDE.md","GEMINI.md"]
 }
 ```
 
@@ -46,7 +40,7 @@ Creates tool-specific configuration directories:
 - `.qwen/settings.json`:
 ```json
 {
-  "contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"
+  "contextfilename": ["CLAUDE.md","QWEN.md"]
 }
 ```
 
@@ -184,7 +178,7 @@ target/
 /cli:cli-init --tool all --output=.config/
 ```
 
-## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS ⚡ START HERE
+## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS - START HERE
 
 **When this command is triggered, follow these exact steps:**
 
@@ -197,7 +191,7 @@ target/
 ### Step 2: Workspace Analysis (MANDATORY FIRST)
 ```bash
 # Analyze workspace structure
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh json)
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{"format":"json"}')
 ```
 
 ### Step 3: Technology Detection
@@ -215,7 +209,7 @@ bash(find . -name "Dockerfile" | head -1)
 ```bash
 # Create .gemini/ directory and settings.json
 mkdir -p .gemini
-echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .gemini/settings.json
+Write({file_path: '.gemini/settings.json', content: '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}'})
 
 # Create .geminiignore file with detected technology rules
 # Backup existing files if present
@@ -225,7 +219,7 @@ echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .gemini/settings.json
 ```bash
 # Create .qwen/ directory and settings.json
 mkdir -p .qwen
-echo '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}' > .qwen/settings.json
+Write({file_path: '.qwen/settings.json', content: '{"contextfilename": "CLAUDE.md"}'})
 
 # Create .qwenignore file with detected technology rules
 # Backup existing files if present
@@ -434,15 +428,6 @@ docker-compose.override.yml
 /cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
 ```
 
-## Key Benefits
-
-- **Automatic Detection**: No manual configuration needed
-- **Multi-Tool Support**: Configure Gemini and Qwen simultaneously
-- **Technology Aware**: Rules adapted to actual project stack
-- **Maintainable**: Clear sections for easy customization
-- **Consistent**: Follows gitignore syntax standards
-- **Safe**: Creates backups of existing files
-- **Flexible**: Initialize specific tools or all at once
 
 ## Tool Selection Guide
 
@@ -452,4 +437,4 @@ docker-compose.override.yml
 | **Gemini-only workflow** | `/cli:cli-init --tool gemini` | Creates .gemini/ and .geminiignore only |
 | **Qwen-only workflow** | `/cli:cli-init --tool qwen` | Creates .qwen/ and .qwenignore only |
 | **Preview before commit** | `/cli:cli-init --preview` | Shows what would be generated |
-| **Update configurations** | `/cli:cli-init` | Regenerates all files with backups |
+| **Update configurations** | `/cli:cli-init` | Regenerates all files with backups |

.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md

@@ -1,513 +0,0 @@
----
-name: codex-execute
-description: Automated task decomposition and execution with Codex using resume mechanism
-usage: /cli:codex-execute [--verify-git] <task-description|task-id>
-argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
-  - /cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer"
-  - /cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# CLI Codex Execute Command (/cli:codex-execute)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Automated task decomposition and sequential execution with Codex, using `codex exec "..." resume --last` mechanism for continuity between subtasks.
-
-**Input**: User description or task ID (automatically loads from `.task/[ID].json` if applicable)
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-```
-Task Input → Analyze Dependencies → Create Task Flow Diagram →
-Decompose into Subtask Groups → TodoWrite Tracking →
-For Each Subtask Group:
-  For First Subtask in Group:
-    0. Stage existing changes (git add -A) if valid git repo
-    1. Execute with Codex (new session)
-    2. [Optional] Git verification
-    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
-  For Related Subtasks in Same Group:
-    0. Stage changes from previous subtask
-    1. Execute with `codex exec "..." resume --last` (continue session)
-    2. [Optional] Git verification
-    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
-→ Final Summary
-```
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `<input>` (Required): Task description or task ID (e.g., "implement auth" or "IMPL-001")
-  - If input matches task ID format, loads from `.task/[ID].json`
-  - Otherwise, uses input as task description
-- `--verify-git` (Optional): Verify git status after each subtask completion
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-### Phase 1: Input Processing & Task Flow Analysis
-
-1. **Parse Input**:
-   - Check if input matches task ID pattern (e.g., `IMPL-001`, `TASK-123`)
-   - If yes: Load from `.task/[ID].json` and extract requirements
-   - If no: Use input as task description directly
-
-2. **Analyze Dependencies & Create Task Flow Diagram**:
-   - Analyze task complexity and scope
-   - Identify dependencies and relationships between subtasks
-   - Create visual task flow diagram showing:
-     - Independent task groups (parallel execution possible)
-     - Sequential dependencies (must use resume)
-     - Branching logic (conditional paths)
-   - Display flow diagram for user review
-
-**Task Flow Diagram Format**:
-```
-[Group A: Auth Core]
-  A1: Create user model ──┐
-  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
-                          │
-[Group B: API Layer]      │
-  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
-  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
-
-[Group C: Testing]
-  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
-  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
-```
-
-**Diagram Symbols**:
-- `──►` Sequential dependency (must resume previous session)
-- `─┐` Branch point (multiple paths)
-- `─┘` Merge point (wait for completion)
-- `[resume]` Use `codex exec "..." resume --last`
-- `[new session]` Start fresh Codex session
-
-3. **Decompose into Subtask Groups**:
-   - Group related subtasks that share context
-   - Break down into 3-8 subtasks total
-   - Assign each subtask to a group
-   - Create TodoWrite tracker with groups
-   - Display decomposition for user review
-
-**Decomposition Criteria**:
-- Each subtask: 5-15 minutes completable
-- Clear, testable outcomes
-- Explicit dependencies
-- Focused file scope (1-5 files per subtask)
-- **Group coherence**: Subtasks in same group share context/files
-
-### File Discovery for Task Decomposition
-
-Use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files, then group by domain:
-
-**Workflow**: Discover → Analyze scope → Group by files → Create task flow
-
-**Example**:
-```bash
-# Discover files
-rg "authentication" --files-with-matches --type ts
-
-# Group by domain
-# Group A: src/auth/model.ts, src/auth/schema.ts
-# Group B: src/api/auth.ts, src/middleware/auth.ts
-# Group C: tests/auth/*.test.ts
-
-# Each group becomes a session with related subtasks
-```
-
-File patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-
-### Phase 2: Group-Based Execution
-
-**Pre-Execution Git Staging** (if valid git repository):
-```bash
-# Stage all current changes before codex execution
-# This makes codex changes clearly visible in git diff
-git add -A
-git status --short
-```
-
-**For First Subtask in Each Group** (New Session):
-```bash
-# Start new Codex session for independent task group
-codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [group goal]
-TASK: [subtask description - first in group]
-CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
-RULES: [constraints]
-Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**For Related Subtasks in Same Group** (Resume Session):
-```bash
-# Stage changes from previous subtask (if valid git repository)
-git add -A
-
-# Resume session ONLY for subtasks in same group
-codex exec "
-CONTINUE IN SAME GROUP:
-Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask N of M
-
-PURPOSE: [continuation goal within group]
-TASK: [subtask N description]
-CONTEXT: Previous work in this group completed, now focus on @{new_relevant_files}
-EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
-RULES: Build on previous subtask in group, maintain consistency
-" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**For First Subtask in Different Group** (New Session):
-```bash
-# Stage changes from previous group
-git add -A
-
-# Start NEW session for different group (no resume)
-codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [new group goal]
-TASK: [subtask description - first in new group]
-CONTEXT: @{different_files} @{CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
-RULES: [constraints]
-Group [Y]: [new group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**Resume Decision Logic**:
-```
-if (subtask.group == previous_subtask.group):
-    use `codex exec "..." resume --last`  # Continue session
-else:
-    use `codex -C [dir] exec "..."`       # New session
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Verification (if --verify-git enabled)
-
-After each subtask completion:
-```bash
-# Check git status
-git status --short
-
-# Verify expected changes
-git diff --stat
-
-# Optional: Check for untracked files that should be committed
-git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
-```
-
-**Verification Checks**:
-- Files modified match subtask scope
-- No unexpected changes in unrelated files
-- No merge conflicts or errors
-- Code compiles/runs (if applicable)
-
-### Phase 4: TodoWrite Tracking with Groups
-
-**Initial Setup with Task Flow**:
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    // Display task flow diagram first
-    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
-
-    // Group A subtasks (will use resume within group)
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
-
-    // Group B subtasks (new session, then resume within group)
-    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 1" },
-    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 2" },
-
-    // Group C subtasks (new session)
-    { content: "[Group C] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group C subtask 1" },
-
-    { content: "Final verification and summary", status: "pending", activeForm: "Verifying and summarizing" }
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-**After Each Subtask**:
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "completed", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
-    // ... update status
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-## Codex Resume Mechanism
-
-**Why Group-Based Resume?**
-- **Within Group**: Maintains conversation context for related subtasks
-  - Codex remembers previous decisions and patterns
-  - Reduces context repetition
-  - Ensures consistency in implementation style
-- **Between Groups**: Fresh session for independent tasks
-  - Avoids context pollution from unrelated work
-  - Prevents confusion when switching domains
-  - Maintains focused attention on current group
-
-**How It Works**:
-1. **First subtask in Group A**: Creates new Codex session
-2. **Subsequent subtasks in Group A**: Use `codex resume --last` to continue session
-3. **First subtask in Group B**: Creates NEW Codex session (no resume)
-4. **Subsequent subtasks in Group B**: Use `codex resume --last` within Group B
-5. Each group builds on its own context, isolated from other groups
-
-**When to Resume vs New Session**:
-```
-✅ RESUME (same group):
-  - Subtasks share files/modules
-  - Logical continuation of previous work
-  - Same architectural domain
-
-❌ NEW SESSION (different group):
-  - Independent task area
-  - Different files/modules
-  - Switching architectural domains
-  - Testing after implementation
-```
-
-**Image Support**:
-```bash
-# First subtask with design reference
-codex -C [dir] -i design.png --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-
-# Resume for next subtask (image context preserved)
-codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-**Subtask Failure**:
-1. Mark subtask as blocked in TodoWrite
-2. Report error details to user
-3. Pause execution for manual intervention
-4. User can choose to:
-   - Retry current subtask
-   - Continue to next subtask
-   - Abort entire task
-
-**Git Verification Failure** (if --verify-git):
-1. Show unexpected changes
-2. Pause execution
-3. Request user decision:
-   - Continue anyway
-   - Rollback and retry
-   - Manual fix
-
-**Codex Session Lost**:
-1. Detect if `codex exec "..." resume --last` fails
-2. Attempt retry with fresh session
-3. Report to user if manual intervention needed
-
-## Output Format
-
-**During Execution**:
-```
-📊 Task Flow Diagram:
-[Group A: Auth Core]
-  A1: Create user model ──┐
-  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
-                          │
-[Group B: API Layer]      │
-  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
-  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
-
-[Group C: Testing]
-  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
-  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
-
-📋 Task Decomposition:
-  [Group A] 1. Create user model
-  [Group A] 2. Add validation logic [resume]
-  [Group A] 3. Implement database schema [resume]
-  [Group B] 4. Create auth endpoints [new session]
-  [Group B] 5. Add middleware [resume]
-  [Group B] 6. Error handling [resume]
-  [Group C] 7. Unit tests [new session]
-  [Group C] 8. Integration tests [resume]
-
-▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
-  Starting new Codex session for Group A...
-  [Codex output]
-  ✅ Subtask 1 completed
-
-🔍 Git Verification:
-  M  src/models/user.ts
-  ✅ Changes verified
-
-▶️  [Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
-  Resuming Codex session (same group)...
-  [Codex output]
-  ✅ Subtask 2 completed
-
-▶️  [Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
-  Starting NEW Codex session for Group B...
-  [Codex output]
-  ✅ Subtask 4 completed
-...
-
-✅ All Subtasks Completed
-📊 Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
-```
-
-**Final Summary**:
-```markdown
-# Task Execution Summary: [Task Description]
-
-## Subtasks Completed
-1. ✅ [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
-2. ✅ [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
-...
-
-## Files Modified
-- src/file1.ts:10-50 - [changes]
-- src/file2.ts - [changes]
-
-## Git Status
-- N files modified
-- M files added
-- No conflicts
-
-## Next Steps
-- [Suggested follow-up actions]
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Example 1: Simple Task with Groups**
-```bash
-/cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
-
-# Task Flow Diagram:
-# [Group A: Data Layer]
-#   A1: Create user model ──► [resume] ──► A2: Database schema
-#
-# [Group B: Auth Logic]
-#   B1: JWT token generation ──► [new session]
-#   B2: Authentication middleware ──► [resume]
-#
-# [Group C: API Endpoints]
-#   C1: Login/logout endpoints ──► [new session]
-#
-# [Group D: Testing]
-#   D1: Unit tests ──► [new session]
-#   D2: Integration tests ──► [resume]
-
-# Execution:
-# Group A: A1 (new) → A2 (resume)
-# Group B: B1 (new) → B2 (resume)
-# Group C: C1 (new)
-# Group D: D1 (new) → D2 (resume)
-```
-
-**Example 2: With Git Verification**
-```bash
-/cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer to use dependency injection"
-
-# After each subtask, verifies:
-# - Only expected files modified
-# - No breaking changes in unrelated code
-# - Tests still pass
-```
-
-**Example 3: With Task ID**
-```bash
-/cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
-
-# Loads task from .task/IMPL-001.json
-# Decomposes based on task requirements
-```
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Task Flow First**: Always create visual flow diagram before execution
-2. **Group Related Work**: Cluster subtasks by domain/files for efficient resume
-3. **Subtask Granularity**: Keep subtasks small and focused (5-15 min each)
-4. **Clear Boundaries**: Each subtask should have well-defined input/output
-5. **Git Hygiene**: Use `--verify-git` for critical refactoring
-6. **Pre-Execution Staging**: Stage changes before each subtask to clearly see codex modifications
-7. **Smart Resume**: Use `resume --last` ONLY within same group
-8. **Fresh Sessions**: Start new session when switching to different group/domain
-9. **Recovery Points**: TodoWrite with group labels provides clear progress tracking
-10. **Image References**: Attach design files for UI tasks (first subtask in group)
-
-## Input Processing
-
-**Automatic Detection**:
-- Input matches task ID pattern → Load from `.task/[ID].json`
-- Otherwise → Use as task description
-
-**Task JSON Structure** (when loading from file):
-```json
-{
-  "task_id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Implement user authentication",
-  "description": "Create JWT-based auth system",
-  "acceptance_criteria": [...],
-  "scope": {...},
-  "brainstorming_refs": [...]
-}
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Execution Log Destination**:
-- **IF** active workflow session exists:
-  - Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
-  - Task summaries: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
-  - Task updates: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.task/[TASK-ID].json` status updates
-  - TodoWrite tracking: Embedded in execution log
-- **ELSE** (no active session):
-  - **Recommended**: Create workflow session first (`/workflow:session:start`)
-  - **Alternative**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Output Files** (during execution):
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[session-id]/
-├── .chat/
-│   └── codex-execute-20250105-143022.md    # Full execution log with task flow
-├── .summaries/
-│   ├── IMPL-001.1-summary.md               # Subtask summaries
-│   ├── IMPL-001.2-summary.md
-│   └── IMPL-001-summary.md                 # Final task summary
-└── .task/
-    ├── IMPL-001.json                       # Updated task status
-    └── [subtask JSONs if decomposed]
-```
-
-**Examples**:
-- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing multi-stage auth implementation:
-  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/codex-execute-20250105-143022.md`
-  - Summaries: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001.{1,2,3}-summary.md`
-  - Task status: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.task/IMPL-001.json` (status: completed)
-- No session, ad-hoc multi-stage task:
-  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-auth-refactor-20250105-143045.md`
-
-**Save Results**:
-- Execution log with task flow diagram and TodoWrite tracking
-- Individual summaries for each completed subtask
-- Final consolidated summary when all subtasks complete
-- Modified code files throughout project
-
-## Notes
-
-**vs. `/cli:execute`**:
-- `/cli:execute`: Single-shot execution with Gemini/Qwen/Codex
-- `/cli:codex-execute`: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition and resume mechanism
-
-**Input Flexibility**: Accepts both freeform descriptions and task IDs (auto-detects and loads JSON)
-
-**Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
-
-**Output Details**:
-- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes

.claude/commands/cli/execute.md

@@ -1,185 +0,0 @@
----
-name: execute
-description: Auto-execution of implementation tasks with YOLO permissions and intelligent context inference
-usage: /cli:execute [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] <description|task-id>
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
-examples:
-  - /cli:execute "implement user authentication system"
-  - /cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "optimize React component"
-  - /cli:execute --tool codex IMPL-001
-  - /cli:execute --enhance "fix API performance issues"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations). **MODIFIES CODE**.
-
-**Intent**: Autonomous code implementation, modification, and generation
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: Automatic context inference and file pattern detection
-
-## Core Behavior
-
-1. **Code Modification**: This command MODIFIES, CREATES, and DELETES code files
-2. **Auto-Approval**: YOLO mode bypasses confirmation prompts for all operations
-3. **Implementation Focus**: Executes actual code changes, not just recommendations
-4. **Requires Explicit Intent**: Use only when implementation is intended
-
-## Core Concepts
-
-### YOLO Permissions
-Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
-
-**⚠️ WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
-
-### Execution Modes
-
-**1. Description Mode** (supports `--enhance`):
-- Input: Natural language description
-- Process: [Optional: Enhance] → Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Execute
-
-**2. Task ID Mode** (no `--enhance`):
-- Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
-- Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
-
-### Context Inference
-
-Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology:
-- "auth" → `@{**/*auth*,**/*user*}`
-- "React" → `@{src/**/*.{jsx,tsx}}`
-- "api" → `@{**/api/**/*,**/routes/**/*}`
-- Always includes: `@{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}`
-
-For precise file targeting, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first.
-
-### Codex Session Continuity
-
-**Resume Pattern** for related tasks:
-```bash
-# First task - establish session
-codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "[task]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-
-# Related task - continue session
-codex --full-auto exec "[related-task]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See intelligent-tools-strategy.md for auto-resume rules.
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
-- `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
-- `--debug` - Verbose logging
-- `--save-session` - Save execution to workflow session
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-**Session Management**: Auto-detects `.workflow/.active-*` marker
-- Active session: Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- No session: Create new session or save to scratchpad
-
-**Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Execution Log Destination**:
-- **IF** active workflow session exists:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-  - Update task status in `.task/[TASK-ID].json` (if task ID provided)
-  - Generate summary in `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md`
-- **ELSE** (no active session):
-  - **Option 1**: Create new workflow session for task
-  - **Option 2**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Output Files** (when active session exists):
-- Execution log: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- Task summary: `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
-- Modified code: Project files per implementation
-
-**Examples**:
-- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing `IMPL-001`:
-  - Log: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.chat/execute-20250105-143022.md`
-  - Summary: `.workflow/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001-summary.md`
-- No session, ad-hoc implementation:
-  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/execute-jwt-auth-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-# Gemini/Qwen: MODE=write with --approval-mode yolo
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
-PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
-TASK: [specific implementation]
-MODE: write
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md} [auto-detected files]
-EXPECTED: Working implementation with code changes
-RULES: [constraints] | Auto-approve all changes
-"
-
-# Codex: MODE=auto with danger-full-access
-codex -C . --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [implementation goal]
-TASK: [specific implementation]
-MODE: auto
-CONTEXT: [auto-detected files]
-EXPECTED: Complete implementation with tests
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-# Executes: Creates auth middleware, updates routes, modifies config
-# Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
-```
-
-**Enhanced Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
-# Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
-# Step 2: Execute implementation with auto-approval
-# Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
-```
-
-**Task Execution** (⚠️ modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute IMPL-001
-# Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
-# Executes: Implementation based on task spec
-# Result: Code changes per task definition
-```
-
-**Codex Implementation** (⚠️ modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
-# Executes: Codex with full file access
-# Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
-```
-
-**Qwen Code Generation** (⚠️ modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
-# Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
-# Step 2: Execute with MODE=write
-# Result: REFACTORED auth code with structural changes
-```
-
-## Comparison with Analysis Commands
-
-| Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
-|---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
-| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | ❌ NO | N/A |
-| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | ❌ NO | N/A |
-| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | ✅ **YES** | ✅ **YES** |
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates, YOLO mode details, and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Output routing and scratchpad details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command modifies code - execution logs document changes made

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-index.md

@@ -1,121 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bug-index
-description: Bug analysis and fix suggestions using CLI tools
-usage: /cli:mode:bug-index [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "bug description"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
-examples:
-  - /cli:mode:bug-index "authentication null pointer error"
-  - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool qwen --enhance "login not working"
-  - /cli:mode:bug-index --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "token validation fails"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Bug Index (/cli:mode:bug-index)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Systematic bug analysis with diagnostic template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`).
-
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
-- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error message
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[bug-description]"` first
-3. Parse bug description (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
-5. Build command for selected tool with bug-fix template
-6. Execute analysis (read-only, provides fix recommendations)
-7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes bugs and suggests fixes - it does NOT modify code
-2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
-3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-4. **Template Required**: Always use bug-fix template
-5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results and fix recommendations to session chat
-
-## Analysis Focus (via Template)
-
-- Root cause investigation and diagnosis
-- Code path tracing to locate issues
-- Targeted minimal fix recommendations
-- Impact assessment of proposed changes
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [bug analysis goal]
-TASK: Systematic bug analysis and fix recommendations
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Root cause analysis, code path tracing, targeted fix suggestions
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: [description]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Bug Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Debug authentication null pointer error
-TASK: Identify root cause and provide fix recommendations
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Root cause, code path, minimal fix suggestion, impact assessment
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: null pointer in login flow
-"
-```
-
-**Directory-Specific**:
-```bash
-cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Fix token validation failure
-TASK: Analyze token validation bug in auth module
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Validation logic analysis, fix recommendation with minimal changes
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md) | Bug: token validation fails intermittently
-"
-```
-
-## Bug Investigation Workflow
-
-```bash
-# 1. Find bug-related files
-rg "error_keyword" --files-with-matches
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="error|exception", file_pattern="*.ts")
-
-# 2. Execute bug analysis with focused context (analysis only, no code changes)
-/cli:mode:bug-index --cd "src/module" "specific error description"
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND bug is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-index-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR quick debugging**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/bug-index-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-payment-fix`, analyzing payment bug → `.chat/bug-index-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, quick null pointer investigation → `.scratchpad/bug-index-null-pointer-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/bug-fix.md`
-- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive codebase context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md

@@ -1,127 +0,0 @@
----
-name: code-analysis
-description: Deep code analysis and debugging using CLI tools with specialized template
-usage: /cli:mode:code-analysis [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "analysis target"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
-examples:
-  - /cli:mode:code-analysis "analyze authentication flow logic"
-  - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen --enhance "explain data transformation pipeline"
-  - /cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex --cd "src/core" "trace execution path for user registration"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`).
-
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
-- `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[analysis-target]"` first
-3. Parse analysis target (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
-5. Build command for selected tool with code-analysis template
-6. Execute deep analysis (read-only, no code modification)
-7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Analysis Only**: This command analyzes code and provides insights - it does NOT modify code
-2. **Tool Selection**: Use `--tool` value or default to gemini
-3. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before analysis
-4. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-5. **Template Required**: Always use code-analysis template
-6. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
-
-## Analysis Capabilities (via Template)
-
-- **Systematic Code Analysis**: Break down complex code into manageable parts
-- **Execution Path Tracing**: Track variable states and call stacks
-- **Control & Data Flow**: Understand code logic and data transformations
-- **Call Flow Visualization**: Diagram function calling sequences
-- **Logical Reasoning**: Explain "why" behind code behavior
-- **Debugging Insights**: Identify potential bugs or inefficiencies
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [analysis goal]
-TASK: Systematic code analysis and execution path tracing
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Execution trace, call flow diagram, debugging insights
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on [aspect]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Code Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Trace authentication execution flow
-TASK: Analyze complete auth flow from request to response
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Step-by-step execution trace with call diagram, variable states
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on control flow
-"
-```
-
-**Directory-Specific Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Understand JWT token validation logic
-TASK: Trace JWT validation from middleware to service layer
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Validation flow diagram, token lifecycle analysis
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md) | Focus on security
-"
-```
-
-## Code Tracing Workflow
-
-```bash
-# 1. Find entry points and related files
-rg "function.*authenticate|class.*AuthService" --files-with-matches
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="authenticate|login", file_pattern="*.ts")
-
-# 2. Build call graph understanding
-# entry → middleware → service → repository
-
-# 3. Execute deep analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
-/cli:mode:code-analysis --cd "src" "trace execution from entry point"
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND analysis is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR standalone analysis**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/code-analysis-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-auth-refactor`, analyzing auth flow → `.chat/code-analysis-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, tracing request lifecycle → `.scratchpad/code-analysis-request-flow-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/code-analysis.md`
-- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive code context

.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan
-description: Project planning and architecture analysis using CLI tools
-usage: /cli:mode:plan [--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>] [--enhance] [--cd "path"] "topic"
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
-examples:
-  - /cli:mode:plan "design user dashboard"
-  - /cli:mode:plan --tool qwen --enhance "plan microservices migration"
-  - /cli:mode:plan --tool codex --cd "src/auth" "authentication system"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis with strategic planning template (`~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`).
-
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped planning
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance topic with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
-- `<topic>` (Required) - Planning topic or architectural question
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-1. **Parse tool selection**: Extract `--tool` flag (default: gemini)
-2. **If `--enhance` flag present**: Execute `/enhance-prompt "[topic]"` first
-3. Parse topic (original or enhanced)
-4. Detect target directory (from `--cd` or auto-infer)
-5. Build command for selected tool with planning template
-6. Execute analysis (read-only, no code modification)
-7. Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Analysis Only**: This command provides planning recommendations and insights - it does NOT modify code
-2. **Enhance First (if flagged)**: Execute `/enhance-prompt` before planning
-3. **Directory Context**: Use `cd` when `--cd` provided or auto-detected
-4. **Template Required**: Always use planning template
-5. **Session Output**: Save analysis results to session chat
-
-## Planning Capabilities (via Template)
-
-- Strategic architecture insights and recommendations
-- Implementation roadmaps and suggestions
-- Key technical decisions analysis
-- Risk assessment
-- Resource planning
-
-## Command Template
-
-```bash
-cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: [planning goal from topic]
-TASK: Comprehensive planning and architecture analysis
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md} [entire codebase in directory]
-EXPECTED: Strategic insights, implementation recommendations, key decisions
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on [topic area]
-"
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Planning Analysis**:
-```bash
-cd . && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Design user dashboard architecture
-TASK: Plan dashboard component structure and data flow
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Architecture recommendations, component design, data flow diagram
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Focus on scalability
-"
-```
-
-**Directory-Specific Planning**:
-```bash
-cd src/api && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper --all-files -p "
-PURPOSE: Plan API refactoring strategy
-TASK: Analyze current API structure and recommend improvements
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{CLAUDE.md,**/*CLAUDE.md}
-EXPECTED: Refactoring roadmap, breaking change analysis, migration plan
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md) | Maintain backward compatibility
-"
-```
-
-## Planning Workflow
-
-```bash
-# 1. Discover project structure
-~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="*.ts")
-
-# 2. Gather existing architecture info
-rg "architecture|design" --files-with-matches
-
-# 3. Execute planning analysis (analysis only, no code changes)
-/cli:mode:plan "topic for strategic planning"
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Output Destination Logic**:
-- **Active session exists AND planning is session-relevant**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md`
-- **No active session OR exploratory planning**:
-  - Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/plan-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Examples**:
-- During active session `WFS-dashboard`, planning dashboard architecture → `.chat/plan-20250105-143022.md`
-- No session, exploring new feature idea → `.scratchpad/plan-feature-idea-20250105-143045.md`
-
-## Notes
-
-- Command templates and file patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-- Scratchpad directory details: see workflow-architecture.md
-- Template path: `~/.claude/prompt-templates/plan.md`
-- Always uses `--all-files` for comprehensive project context

.claude/commands/enhance-prompt.md

@@ -1,42 +1,22 @@
 ---
 name: enhance-prompt
-description: Context-aware prompt enhancement using session memory and codebase analysis
-usage: /enhance-prompt <user_input>
+description: Enhanced prompt transformation using session memory and intent analysis with --enhance flag detection
 argument-hint: "user input to enhance"
-examples:
-  - /enhance-prompt "add user profile editing"
-  - /enhance-prompt "fix login button"
-  - /enhance-prompt "clean up the payment code"
 ---
 
 ## Overview
 
-Systematically enhances user prompts by combining session memory context with codebase patterns, translating ambiguous requests into actionable specifications.
+Systematically enhances user prompts by leveraging session memory context and intent analysis, translating ambiguous requests into actionable specifications.
 
 ## Core Protocol
 
 **Enhancement Pipeline:**
-`Intent Translation` → `Context Integration` → `Gemini Analysis (if needed)` → `Structured Output`
+`Intent Translation` → `Context Integration` → `Structured Output`
 
 **Context Sources:**
 - Session memory (conversation history, previous analysis)
-- Codebase patterns (via Gemini when triggered)
 - Implicit technical requirements
-
-## Gemini Trigger Logic
-
-```pseudo
-FUNCTION should_use_gemini(user_prompt):
-  critical_keywords = ["refactor", "migrate", "redesign", "auth", "payment", "security"]
-
-  RETURN (
-    prompt_affects_multiple_modules(user_prompt, threshold=3) OR
-    any_keyword_in_prompt(critical_keywords, user_prompt)
-  )
-END
-```
-
-**Gemini Integration:** @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
+- User intent patterns
 
 ## Enhancement Rules
 
@@ -52,22 +32,18 @@ END
 
 ### Context Integration Strategy
 
-**Session Memory First:**
+**Session Memory:**
 - Reference recent conversation context
 - Reuse previously identified patterns
 - Build on established understanding
-
-**Codebase Analysis (via Gemini):**
-- Only when complexity requires it
-- Focus on integration points
-- Identify existing patterns
+- Infer technical requirements from discussion
 
 **Example:**
 ```bash
 # User: "add login"
 # Session Memory: Previous auth discussion, JWT mentioned
 # Inferred: JWT-based auth, integrate with existing session management
-# Gemini (if multi-module): Analyze AuthService patterns, middleware structure
+# Action: Implement JWT authentication with session persistence
 ```
 
 ## Output Structure
@@ -81,7 +57,7 @@ ATTENTION: [Critical constraints]
 
 ### Output Examples
 
-**Simple (no Gemini):**
+**Example 1:**
 ```bash
 # Input: "fix login button"
 INTENT: Debug non-functional login button
@@ -90,28 +66,28 @@ ACTION: Check event binding → verify state updates → test auth flow
 ATTENTION: Preserve existing OAuth integration
 ```
 
-**Complex (with Gemini):**
+**Example 2:**
 ```bash
 # Input: "refactor payment code"
 INTENT: Restructure payment module for maintainability
-CONTEXT: Session memory - PCI compliance requirements
-         Gemini - PaymentService → StripeAdapter pattern identified
-ACTION: Extract reusable validators → isolate payment gateway logic
+CONTEXT: Session memory - PCI compliance requirements, Stripe integration patterns
+ACTION: Extract reusable validators → isolate payment gateway logic → maintain adapter pattern
 ATTENTION: Zero behavior change, maintain PCI compliance, full test coverage
 ```
 
-## Automatic Triggers
+## Enhancement Triggers
 
 - Ambiguous language: "fix", "improve", "clean up"
-- Multi-module impact (>3 modules)
+- Vague requests requiring clarification
+- Complex technical requirements
 - Architecture changes
 - Critical systems: auth, payment, security
-- Complex refactoring
+- Multi-step refactoring
 
 ## Key Principles
 
-1. **Memory First**: Leverage session context before analysis
-2. **Minimal Gemini**: Only when complexity demands it
-3. **Context Reuse**: Build on previous understanding
-4. **Clear Output**: Structured, actionable specifications
+1. **Session Memory First**: Leverage conversation context and established understanding
+2. **Context Reuse**: Build on previous discussions and decisions
+3. **Clear Output**: Structured, actionable specifications
+4. **Intent Clarification**: Transform vague requests into specific technical goals
 5. **Avoid Duplication**: Reference existing context, don't repeat

.claude/commands/issue/execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+---
+name: execute
+description: Execute queue with codex using endpoint-driven task fetching (single task per codex instance)
+argument-hint: "[--parallel <n>] [--executor codex|gemini]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Execute Command (/issue:execute)
+
+## Overview
+
+Execution orchestrator that coordinates codex instances. Each task is executed by an independent codex instance that fetches its task via CLI endpoint. **Codex does NOT read task files** - it calls `ccw issue next` to get task data dynamically.
+
+**Core design:**
+- Single task per codex instance (not loop mode)
+- Endpoint-driven: `ccw issue next` → execute → `ccw issue complete`
+- No file reading in codex
+- Orchestrator manages parallelism
+
+## Storage Structure (Queue History)
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/
+├── issues.jsonl              # All issues (one per line)
+├── queues/                   # Queue history directory
+│   ├── index.json            # Queue index (active + history)
+│   └── {queue-id}.json       # Individual queue files
+└── solutions/
+    ├── {issue-id}.jsonl      # Solutions for issue
+    └── ...
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/issue:execute [FLAGS]
+
+# Examples
+/issue:execute                    # Execute all ready tasks
+/issue:execute --parallel 3       # Execute up to 3 tasks in parallel
+/issue:execute --executor codex   # Force codex executor
+
+# Flags
+--parallel <n>        Max parallel codex instances (default: 1)
+--executor <type>     Force executor: codex|gemini|agent
+--dry-run             Show what would execute without running
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Queue Loading
+   ├─ Load queue.json
+   ├─ Count pending/ready tasks
+   └─ Initialize TodoWrite tracking
+
+Phase 2: Ready Task Detection
+   ├─ Find tasks with satisfied dependencies
+   ├─ Group by execution_group (parallel batches)
+   └─ Determine execution order
+
+Phase 3: Codex Coordination
+   ├─ For each ready task:
+   │   ├─ Launch independent codex instance
+   │   ├─ Codex calls: ccw issue next
+   │   ├─ Codex receives task data (NOT file)
+   │   ├─ Codex executes task
+   │   ├─ Codex calls: ccw issue complete <queue-id>
+   │   └─ Update TodoWrite
+   └─ Parallel execution based on --parallel flag
+
+Phase 4: Completion
+   ├─ Generate execution summary
+   ├─ Update issue statuses in issues.jsonl
+   └─ Display results
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Queue Loading
+
+```javascript
+// Load active queue via CLI endpoint
+const queueJson = Bash(`ccw issue status --json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}'`);
+const queue = JSON.parse(queueJson);
+
+if (!queue.id || queue.tasks?.length === 0) {
+  console.log('No active queue found. Run /issue:queue first.');
+  return;
+}
+
+// Count by status
+const pending = queue.tasks.filter(q => q.status === 'pending');
+const executing = queue.tasks.filter(q => q.status === 'executing');
+const completed = queue.tasks.filter(q => q.status === 'completed');
+
+console.log(`
+## Execution Queue Status
+
+- Pending: ${pending.length}
+- Executing: ${executing.length}
+- Completed: ${completed.length}
+- Total: ${queue.tasks.length}
+`);
+
+if (pending.length === 0 && executing.length === 0) {
+  console.log('All tasks completed!');
+  return;
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Ready Task Detection
+
+```javascript
+// Find ready tasks (dependencies satisfied)
+function getReadyTasks() {
+  const completedIds = new Set(
+    queue.tasks.filter(q => q.status === 'completed').map(q => q.item_id)
+  );
+
+  return queue.tasks.filter(item => {
+    if (item.status !== 'pending') return false;
+    return item.depends_on.every(depId => completedIds.has(depId));
+  });
+}
+
+const readyTasks = getReadyTasks();
+
+if (readyTasks.length === 0) {
+  if (executing.length > 0) {
+    console.log('Tasks are currently executing. Wait for completion.');
+  } else {
+    console.log('No ready tasks. Check for blocked dependencies.');
+  }
+  return;
+}
+
+console.log(`Found ${readyTasks.length} ready tasks`);
+
+// Sort by execution order
+readyTasks.sort((a, b) => a.execution_order - b.execution_order);
+
+// Initialize TodoWrite
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: readyTasks.slice(0, parallelLimit).map(t => ({
+    content: `[${t.item_id}] ${t.issue_id}:${t.task_id}`,
+    status: 'pending',
+    activeForm: `Executing ${t.item_id}`
+  }))
+});
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Codex Coordination (Single Task Mode - Full Lifecycle)
+
+```javascript
+// Execute tasks - single codex instance per task with full lifecycle
+async function executeTask(queueItem) {
+  const codexPrompt = `
+## Single Task Execution - CLOSED-LOOP LIFECYCLE
+
+You are executing ONE task from the issue queue. Each task has 5 phases that MUST ALL complete successfully.
+
+### Step 1: Fetch Task
+Run this command to get your task:
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw issue next
+\`\`\`
+
+This returns JSON with full lifecycle definition:
+- task.implementation: Implementation steps
+- task.test: Test requirements and commands
+- task.regression: Regression check commands
+- task.acceptance: Acceptance criteria and verification
+- task.commit: Commit specification
+
+### Step 2: Execute Full Lifecycle
+
+**Phase 1: IMPLEMENT**
+1. Follow task.implementation steps in order
+2. Modify files specified in modification_points
+3. Use context.relevant_files for reference
+4. Use context.patterns for code style
+
+**Phase 2: TEST**
+1. Run test commands from task.test.commands
+2. Ensure all unit tests pass (task.test.unit)
+3. Run integration tests if specified (task.test.integration)
+4. Verify coverage meets task.test.coverage_target if specified
+5. If tests fail → fix code and re-run, do NOT proceed until tests pass
+
+**Phase 3: REGRESSION**
+1. Run all commands in task.regression
+2. Ensure no existing tests are broken
+3. If regression fails → fix and re-run
+
+**Phase 4: ACCEPTANCE**
+1. Verify each criterion in task.acceptance.criteria
+2. Execute verification steps in task.acceptance.verification
+3. Complete any manual_checks if specified
+4. All criteria MUST pass before proceeding
+
+**Phase 5: COMMIT**
+1. Stage all modified files
+2. Use task.commit.message_template as commit message
+3. Commit with: git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'\n<message>\nEOF\n)"
+4. If commit_strategy is 'per-task', commit now
+5. If commit_strategy is 'atomic' or 'squash', stage but don't commit
+
+### Step 3: Report Completion
+When ALL phases complete successfully:
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw issue complete <item_id> --result '{
+  "files_modified": ["path1", "path2"],
+  "tests_passed": true,
+  "regression_passed": true,
+  "acceptance_passed": true,
+  "committed": true,
+  "commit_hash": "<hash>",
+  "summary": "What was done"
+}'
+\`\`\`
+
+If any phase fails and cannot be fixed:
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw issue fail <item_id> --reason "Phase X failed: <details>"
+\`\`\`
+
+### Rules
+- NEVER skip any lifecycle phase
+- Tests MUST pass before proceeding to acceptance
+- Regression MUST pass before commit
+- ALL acceptance criteria MUST be verified
+- Report accurate lifecycle status in result
+
+### Start Now
+Begin by running: ccw issue next
+`;
+
+  // Execute codex
+  const executor = queueItem.assigned_executor || flags.executor || 'codex';
+
+  if (executor === 'codex') {
+    Bash(
+      `ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(codexPrompt)}" --tool codex --mode write --id exec-${queueItem.item_id}`,
+      timeout=3600000  // 1 hour timeout
+    );
+  } else if (executor === 'gemini') {
+    Bash(
+      `ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(codexPrompt)}" --tool gemini --mode write --id exec-${queueItem.item_id}`,
+      timeout=1800000  // 30 min timeout
+    );
+  } else {
+    // Agent execution
+    Task(
+      subagent_type="code-developer",
+      run_in_background=false,
+      description=`Execute ${queueItem.item_id}`,
+      prompt=codexPrompt
+    );
+  }
+}
+
+// Execute with parallelism
+const parallelLimit = flags.parallel || 1;
+
+for (let i = 0; i < readyTasks.length; i += parallelLimit) {
+  const batch = readyTasks.slice(i, i + parallelLimit);
+
+  console.log(`\n### Executing Batch ${Math.floor(i / parallelLimit) + 1}`);
+  console.log(batch.map(t => `- ${t.item_id}: ${t.issue_id}:${t.task_id}`).join('\n'));
+
+  if (parallelLimit === 1) {
+    // Sequential execution
+    for (const task of batch) {
+      updateTodo(task.item_id, 'in_progress');
+      await executeTask(task);
+      updateTodo(task.item_id, 'completed');
+    }
+  } else {
+    // Parallel execution - launch all at once
+    const executions = batch.map(task => {
+      updateTodo(task.item_id, 'in_progress');
+      return executeTask(task);
+    });
+    await Promise.all(executions);
+    batch.forEach(task => updateTodo(task.item_id, 'completed'));
+  }
+
+  // Refresh ready tasks after batch
+  const newReady = getReadyTasks();
+  if (newReady.length > 0) {
+    console.log(`${newReady.length} more tasks now ready`);
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Codex Task Fetch Response
+
+When codex calls `ccw issue next`, it receives:
+
+```json
+{
+  "item_id": "T-1",
+  "issue_id": "GH-123",
+  "solution_id": "SOL-001",
+  "task": {
+    "id": "T1",
+    "title": "Create auth middleware",
+    "scope": "src/middleware/",
+    "action": "Create",
+    "description": "Create JWT validation middleware",
+    "modification_points": [
+      { "file": "src/middleware/auth.ts", "target": "new file", "change": "Create middleware" }
+    ],
+    "implementation": [
+      "Create auth.ts file in src/middleware/",
+      "Implement JWT token validation using jsonwebtoken",
+      "Add error handling for invalid/expired tokens",
+      "Export middleware function"
+    ],
+    "acceptance": [
+      "Middleware validates JWT tokens successfully",
+      "Returns 401 for invalid or missing tokens",
+      "Passes token payload to request context"
+    ]
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "relevant_files": ["src/config/auth.ts", "src/types/auth.d.ts"],
+    "patterns": "Follow existing middleware pattern in src/middleware/logger.ts"
+  },
+  "execution_hints": {
+    "executor": "codex",
+    "estimated_minutes": 30
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Completion Summary
+
+```javascript
+// Reload queue for final status via CLI
+const finalQueueJson = Bash(`ccw issue status --json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}'`);
+const finalQueue = JSON.parse(finalQueueJson);
+
+// Use queue._metadata for summary (already calculated by CLI)
+const summary = finalQueue._metadata || {
+  completed_count: 0,
+  failed_count: 0,
+  pending_count: 0,
+  total_tasks: 0
+};
+
+console.log(`
+## Execution Complete
+
+**Completed**: ${summary.completed_count}/${summary.total_tasks}
+**Failed**: ${summary.failed_count}
+**Pending**: ${summary.pending_count}
+
+### Task Results
+${(finalQueue.tasks || []).map(q => {
+  const icon = q.status === 'completed' ? '✓' :
+               q.status === 'failed' ? '✗' :
+               q.status === 'executing' ? '⟳' : '○';
+  return `${icon} ${q.item_id} [${q.issue_id}:${q.task_id}] - ${q.status}`;
+}).join('\n')}
+`);
+
+// Issue status updates are handled by ccw issue complete/fail endpoints
+// No need to manually update issues.jsonl here
+
+if (summary.pending_count > 0) {
+  console.log(`
+### Continue Execution
+Run \`/issue:execute\` again to execute remaining tasks.
+`);
+}
+```
+
+## Dry Run Mode
+
+```javascript
+if (flags.dryRun) {
+  console.log(`
+## Dry Run - Would Execute
+
+${readyTasks.map((t, i) => `
+${i + 1}. ${t.item_id}
+   Issue: ${t.issue_id}
+   Task: ${t.task_id}
+   Executor: ${t.assigned_executor}
+   Group: ${t.execution_group}
+`).join('')}
+
+No changes made. Remove --dry-run to execute.
+`);
+  return;
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Queue not found | Display message, suggest /issue:queue |
+| No ready tasks | Check dependencies, show blocked tasks |
+| Codex timeout | Mark as failed, allow retry |
+| ccw issue next empty | All tasks done or blocked |
+| Task execution failure | Marked via ccw issue fail, use `ccw issue retry` to reset |
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Interrupted Tasks
+
+If execution was interrupted (crashed/stopped), `ccw issue next` will automatically resume:
+
+```bash
+# Automatically returns the executing task for resumption
+ccw issue next
+```
+
+Tasks in `executing` status are prioritized and returned first, no manual reset needed.
+
+### Failed Tasks
+
+If a task failed and you want to retry:
+
+```bash
+# Reset all failed tasks to pending
+ccw issue retry
+
+# Reset failed tasks for specific issue
+ccw issue retry <issue-id>
+```
+
+## Endpoint Contract
+
+### `ccw issue next`
+- Returns next ready task as JSON
+- Marks task as 'executing'
+- Returns `{ status: 'empty' }` when no tasks
+
+### `ccw issue complete <item-id>`
+- Marks task as 'completed'
+- Updates queue.json
+- Checks if issue is fully complete
+
+### `ccw issue fail <item-id>`
+- Marks task as 'failed'
+- Records failure reason
+- Allows retry via /issue:execute
+
+### `ccw issue retry [issue-id]`
+- Resets failed tasks to 'pending'
+- Allows re-execution via `ccw issue next`
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:plan` - Plan issues with solutions
+- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue
+- `ccw issue queue list` - View queue status
+- `ccw issue retry` - Retry failed tasks

.claude/commands/issue/manage.md

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+---
+name: manage
+description: Interactive issue management (CRUD) via ccw cli endpoints with menu-driven interface
+argument-hint: "[issue-id] [--action list|view|edit|delete|bulk]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Manage Command (/issue:manage)
+
+## Overview
+
+Interactive menu-driven interface for issue management using `ccw issue` CLI endpoints:
+- **List**: Browse and filter issues
+- **View**: Detailed issue inspection
+- **Edit**: Modify issue fields
+- **Delete**: Remove issues
+- **Bulk**: Batch operations on multiple issues
+
+## CLI Endpoints Reference
+
+```bash
+# Core endpoints (ccw issue)
+ccw issue list                      # List all issues
+ccw issue list <id> --json          # Get issue details
+ccw issue status <id>               # Detailed status
+ccw issue init <id> --title "..."   # Create issue
+ccw issue task <id> --title "..."   # Add task
+ccw issue bind <id> <solution-id>   # Bind solution
+
+# Queue management
+ccw issue queue                     # List current queue
+ccw issue queue add <id>            # Add to queue
+ccw issue queue list                # Queue history
+ccw issue queue switch <queue-id>   # Switch queue
+ccw issue queue archive             # Archive queue
+ccw issue queue delete <queue-id>   # Delete queue
+ccw issue next                      # Get next task
+ccw issue done <queue-id>           # Mark completed
+ccw issue complete <item-id>        # (legacy alias for done)
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+# Interactive mode (menu-driven)
+/issue:manage
+
+# Direct to specific issue
+/issue:manage GH-123
+
+# Direct action
+/issue:manage --action list
+/issue:manage GH-123 --action edit
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+This command delegates to the `issue-manage` skill for detailed implementation.
+
+### Entry Point
+
+```javascript
+const issueId = parseIssueId(userInput);
+const action = flags.action;
+
+// Show main menu if no action specified
+if (!action) {
+  await showMainMenu(issueId);
+} else {
+  await executeAction(action, issueId);
+}
+```
+
+### Main Menu Flow
+
+1. **Dashboard**: Fetch issues summary via `ccw issue list --json`
+2. **Menu**: Present action options via AskUserQuestion
+3. **Route**: Execute selected action (List/View/Edit/Delete/Bulk)
+4. **Loop**: Return to menu after each action
+
+### Available Actions
+
+| Action | Description | CLI Command |
+|--------|-------------|-------------|
+| List | Browse with filters | `ccw issue list --json` |
+| View | Detail view | `ccw issue status <id> --json` |
+| Edit | Modify fields | Update `issues.jsonl` |
+| Delete | Remove issue | Clean up all related files |
+| Bulk | Batch operations | Multi-select + batch update |
+
+## Data Files
+
+| File | Purpose |
+|------|---------|
+| `.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl` | Issue records |
+| `.workflow/issues/solutions/<id>.jsonl` | Solutions per issue |
+| `.workflow/issues/queue.json` | Execution queue |
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| No issues found | Suggest creating with /issue:new |
+| Issue not found | Show available issues, ask for correction |
+| Invalid selection | Show error, re-prompt |
+| Write failure | Check permissions, show error |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:new` - Create structured issue
+- `/issue:plan` - Plan solution for issue
+- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue
+- `/issue:execute` - Execute queued tasks

.claude/commands/issue/new.md

@@ -0,0 +1,451 @@
+---
+name: new
+description: Create structured issue from GitHub URL or text description, extracting key elements into issues.jsonl
+argument-hint: "<github-url | text-description> [--priority 1-5] [--labels label1,label2]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), WebFetch(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
+---
+
+# Issue New Command (/issue:new)
+
+## Overview
+
+Creates a new structured issue from either:
+1. **GitHub Issue URL** - Fetches and parses issue content via `gh` CLI
+2. **Text Description** - Parses natural language into structured fields
+
+Outputs a well-formed issue entry to `.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl`.
+
+## Issue Structure (Closed-Loop)
+
+```typescript
+interface Issue {
+  id: string;                    // GH-123 or ISS-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS
+  title: string;                 // Issue title (clear, concise)
+  status: 'registered';          // Initial status
+  priority: number;              // 1 (critical) to 5 (low)
+  context: string;               // Problem description
+  source: 'github' | 'text';     // Input source type
+  source_url?: string;           // GitHub URL if applicable
+  labels?: string[];             // Categorization labels
+
+  // Structured extraction
+  problem_statement: string;     // What is the problem?
+  expected_behavior?: string;    // What should happen?
+  actual_behavior?: string;      // What actually happens?
+  affected_components?: string[];// Files/modules affected
+  reproduction_steps?: string[]; // Steps to reproduce
+
+  // Closed-loop requirements (guide plan generation)
+  lifecycle_requirements: {
+    test_strategy: 'unit' | 'integration' | 'e2e' | 'manual' | 'auto';
+    regression_scope: 'affected' | 'related' | 'full';  // Which tests to run
+    acceptance_type: 'automated' | 'manual' | 'both';   // How to verify
+    commit_strategy: 'per-task' | 'squash' | 'atomic';  // Commit granularity
+  };
+
+  // Metadata
+  bound_solution_id: null;
+  solution_count: 0;
+  created_at: string;
+  updated_at: string;
+}
+```
+
+## Lifecycle Requirements
+
+The `lifecycle_requirements` field guides downstream commands (`/issue:plan`, `/issue:execute`):
+
+| Field | Options | Purpose |
+|-------|---------|---------|
+| `test_strategy` | `unit`, `integration`, `e2e`, `manual`, `auto` | Which test types to generate |
+| `regression_scope` | `affected`, `related`, `full` | Which tests to run for regression |
+| `acceptance_type` | `automated`, `manual`, `both` | How to verify completion |
+| `commit_strategy` | `per-task`, `squash`, `atomic` | Commit granularity |
+
+> **Note**: Task structure (SolutionTask) is defined in `/issue:plan` - see `.claude/commands/issue/plan.md`
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+# From GitHub URL
+/issue:new https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123
+
+# From text description
+/issue:new "Login fails when password contains special characters. Expected: successful login. Actual: 500 error. Affects src/auth/*"
+
+# With options
+/issue:new <url-or-text> --priority 2 --labels "bug,auth"
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Input Detection
+
+```javascript
+const input = userInput.trim();
+const flags = parseFlags(userInput);  // --priority, --labels
+
+// Detect input type
+const isGitHubUrl = input.match(/github\.com\/[\w-]+\/[\w-]+\/issues\/\d+/);
+const isGitHubShort = input.match(/^#(\d+)$/);  // #123 format
+
+let issueData = {};
+
+if (isGitHubUrl || isGitHubShort) {
+  // GitHub issue - fetch via gh CLI
+  issueData = await fetchGitHubIssue(input);
+} else {
+  // Text description - parse structure
+  issueData = await parseTextDescription(input);
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 2: GitHub Issue Fetching
+
+```javascript
+async function fetchGitHubIssue(urlOrNumber) {
+  let issueRef;
+  
+  if (urlOrNumber.startsWith('http')) {
+    // Extract owner/repo/number from URL
+    const match = urlOrNumber.match(/github\.com\/([\w-]+)\/([\w-]+)\/issues\/(\d+)/);
+    if (!match) throw new Error('Invalid GitHub URL');
+    issueRef = `${match[1]}/${match[2]}#${match[3]}`;
+  } else {
+    // #123 format - use current repo
+    issueRef = urlOrNumber.replace('#', '');
+  }
+  
+  // Fetch via gh CLI
+  const result = Bash(`gh issue view ${issueRef} --json number,title,body,labels,state,url`);
+  const ghIssue = JSON.parse(result);
+  
+  // Parse body for structure
+  const parsed = parseIssueBody(ghIssue.body);
+  
+  return {
+    id: `GH-${ghIssue.number}`,
+    title: ghIssue.title,
+    source: 'github',
+    source_url: ghIssue.url,
+    labels: ghIssue.labels.map(l => l.name),
+    context: ghIssue.body,
+    ...parsed
+  };
+}
+
+function parseIssueBody(body) {
+  // Extract structured sections from markdown body
+  const sections = {};
+  
+  // Problem/Description
+  const problemMatch = body.match(/##?\s*(problem|description|issue)[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+  if (problemMatch) sections.problem_statement = problemMatch[2].trim();
+  
+  // Expected behavior
+  const expectedMatch = body.match(/##?\s*(expected|should)[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+  if (expectedMatch) sections.expected_behavior = expectedMatch[2].trim();
+  
+  // Actual behavior
+  const actualMatch = body.match(/##?\s*(actual|current)[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+  if (actualMatch) sections.actual_behavior = actualMatch[2].trim();
+  
+  // Steps to reproduce
+  const stepsMatch = body.match(/##?\s*(steps|reproduce)[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+  if (stepsMatch) {
+    const stepsText = stepsMatch[2].trim();
+    sections.reproduction_steps = stepsText
+      .split('\n')
+      .filter(line => line.match(/^\s*[\d\-\*]/))
+      .map(line => line.replace(/^\s*[\d\.\-\*]\s*/, '').trim());
+  }
+  
+  // Affected components (from file references)
+  const fileMatches = body.match(/`[^`]*\.(ts|js|tsx|jsx|py|go|rs)[^`]*`/g);
+  if (fileMatches) {
+    sections.affected_components = [...new Set(fileMatches.map(f => f.replace(/`/g, '')))];
+  }
+  
+  // Fallback: use entire body as problem statement
+  if (!sections.problem_statement) {
+    sections.problem_statement = body.substring(0, 500);
+  }
+  
+  return sections;
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Text Description Parsing
+
+```javascript
+async function parseTextDescription(text) {
+  // Generate unique ID
+  const id = `ISS-${new Date().toISOString().replace(/[-:T]/g, '').slice(0, 14)}`;
+  
+  // Extract structured elements using patterns
+  const result = {
+    id,
+    source: 'text',
+    title: '',
+    problem_statement: '',
+    expected_behavior: null,
+    actual_behavior: null,
+    affected_components: [],
+    reproduction_steps: []
+  };
+  
+  // Pattern: "Title. Description. Expected: X. Actual: Y. Affects: files"
+  const sentences = text.split(/\.(?=\s|$)/);
+  
+  // First sentence as title
+  result.title = sentences[0]?.trim() || 'Untitled Issue';
+  
+  // Look for keywords
+  for (const sentence of sentences) {
+    const s = sentence.trim();
+    
+    if (s.match(/^expected:?\s*/i)) {
+      result.expected_behavior = s.replace(/^expected:?\s*/i, '');
+    } else if (s.match(/^actual:?\s*/i)) {
+      result.actual_behavior = s.replace(/^actual:?\s*/i, '');
+    } else if (s.match(/^affects?:?\s*/i)) {
+      const components = s.replace(/^affects?:?\s*/i, '').split(/[,\s]+/);
+      result.affected_components = components.filter(c => c.includes('/') || c.includes('.'));
+    } else if (s.match(/^steps?:?\s*/i)) {
+      result.reproduction_steps = s.replace(/^steps?:?\s*/i, '').split(/[,;]/);
+    } else if (!result.problem_statement && s.length > 10) {
+      result.problem_statement = s;
+    }
+  }
+  
+  // Fallback problem statement
+  if (!result.problem_statement) {
+    result.problem_statement = text.substring(0, 300);
+  }
+  
+  return result;
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Lifecycle Configuration
+
+```javascript
+// Ask for lifecycle requirements (or use smart defaults)
+const lifecycleAnswer = AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: 'Test strategy for this issue?',
+      header: 'Test',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'auto', description: 'Auto-detect based on affected files (Recommended)' },
+        { label: 'unit', description: 'Unit tests only' },
+        { label: 'integration', description: 'Integration tests' },
+        { label: 'e2e', description: 'End-to-end tests' },
+        { label: 'manual', description: 'Manual testing only' }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: 'Regression scope?',
+      header: 'Regression',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'affected', description: 'Only affected module tests (Recommended)' },
+        { label: 'related', description: 'Affected + dependent modules' },
+        { label: 'full', description: 'Full test suite' }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: 'Commit strategy?',
+      header: 'Commit',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'per-task', description: 'One commit per task (Recommended)' },
+        { label: 'atomic', description: 'Single commit for entire issue' },
+        { label: 'squash', description: 'Squash at the end' }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+});
+
+const lifecycle = {
+  test_strategy: lifecycleAnswer.test || 'auto',
+  regression_scope: lifecycleAnswer.regression || 'affected',
+  acceptance_type: 'automated',
+  commit_strategy: lifecycleAnswer.commit || 'per-task'
+};
+
+issueData.lifecycle_requirements = lifecycle;
+```
+
+### Phase 5: User Confirmation
+
+```javascript
+// Show parsed data and ask for confirmation
+console.log(`
+## Parsed Issue
+
+**ID**: ${issueData.id}
+**Title**: ${issueData.title}
+**Source**: ${issueData.source}${issueData.source_url ? ` (${issueData.source_url})` : ''}
+
+### Problem Statement
+${issueData.problem_statement}
+
+${issueData.expected_behavior ? `### Expected Behavior\n${issueData.expected_behavior}\n` : ''}
+${issueData.actual_behavior ? `### Actual Behavior\n${issueData.actual_behavior}\n` : ''}
+${issueData.affected_components?.length ? `### Affected Components\n${issueData.affected_components.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}\n` : ''}
+${issueData.reproduction_steps?.length ? `### Reproduction Steps\n${issueData.reproduction_steps.map((s, i) => `${i+1}. ${s}`).join('\n')}\n` : ''}
+
+### Lifecycle Configuration
+- **Test Strategy**: ${lifecycle.test_strategy}
+- **Regression Scope**: ${lifecycle.regression_scope}
+- **Commit Strategy**: ${lifecycle.commit_strategy}
+`);
+
+// Ask user to confirm or edit
+const answer = AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: 'Create this issue?',
+    header: 'Confirm',
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: 'Create', description: 'Save issue to issues.jsonl' },
+      { label: 'Edit Title', description: 'Modify the issue title' },
+      { label: 'Edit Priority', description: 'Change priority (1-5)' },
+      { label: 'Cancel', description: 'Discard and exit' }
+    ]
+  }]
+});
+
+if (answer.includes('Cancel')) {
+  console.log('Issue creation cancelled.');
+  return;
+}
+
+if (answer.includes('Edit Title')) {
+  const titleAnswer = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: 'Enter new title:',
+      header: 'Title',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: issueData.title.substring(0, 40), description: 'Keep current' }
+      ]
+    }]
+  });
+  // Handle custom input via "Other"
+  if (titleAnswer.customText) {
+    issueData.title = titleAnswer.customText;
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Write to JSONL
+
+```javascript
+// Construct final issue object
+const priority = flags.priority ? parseInt(flags.priority) : 3;
+const labels = flags.labels ? flags.labels.split(',').map(l => l.trim()) : [];
+
+const newIssue = {
+  id: issueData.id,
+  title: issueData.title,
+  status: 'registered',
+  priority,
+  context: issueData.problem_statement,
+  source: issueData.source,
+  source_url: issueData.source_url || null,
+  labels: [...(issueData.labels || []), ...labels],
+
+  // Structured fields
+  problem_statement: issueData.problem_statement,
+  expected_behavior: issueData.expected_behavior || null,
+  actual_behavior: issueData.actual_behavior || null,
+  affected_components: issueData.affected_components || [],
+  reproduction_steps: issueData.reproduction_steps || [],
+
+  // Closed-loop lifecycle requirements
+  lifecycle_requirements: issueData.lifecycle_requirements || {
+    test_strategy: 'auto',
+    regression_scope: 'affected',
+    acceptance_type: 'automated',
+    commit_strategy: 'per-task'
+  },
+
+  // Metadata
+  bound_solution_id: null,
+  solution_count: 0,
+  created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  updated_at: new Date().toISOString()
+};
+
+// Ensure directory exists
+Bash('mkdir -p .workflow/issues');
+
+// Append to issues.jsonl
+const issuesPath = '.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl';
+Bash(`echo '${JSON.stringify(newIssue)}' >> "${issuesPath}"`);
+
+console.log(`
+## Issue Created
+
+**ID**: ${newIssue.id}
+**Title**: ${newIssue.title}
+**Priority**: ${newIssue.priority}
+**Labels**: ${newIssue.labels.join(', ') || 'none'}
+**Source**: ${newIssue.source}
+
+### Next Steps
+1. Plan solution: \`/issue:plan ${newIssue.id}\`
+2. View details: \`ccw issue status ${newIssue.id}\`
+3. Manage issues: \`/issue:manage\`
+`);
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+### GitHub Issue
+
+```bash
+/issue:new https://github.com/myorg/myrepo/issues/42 --priority 2
+
+# Output:
+## Issue Created
+**ID**: GH-42
+**Title**: Fix memory leak in WebSocket handler
+**Priority**: 2
+**Labels**: bug, performance
+**Source**: github (https://github.com/myorg/myrepo/issues/42)
+```
+
+### Text Description
+
+```bash
+/issue:new "API rate limiting not working. Expected: 429 after 100 requests. Actual: No limit. Affects src/middleware/rate-limit.ts"
+
+# Output:
+## Issue Created
+**ID**: ISS-20251227-142530
+**Title**: API rate limiting not working
+**Priority**: 3
+**Labels**: none
+**Source**: text
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Invalid GitHub URL | Show format hint, ask for correction |
+| gh CLI not available | Fall back to WebFetch for public issues |
+| Empty description | Prompt user for required fields |
+| Duplicate issue ID | Auto-increment or suggest merge |
+| Parse failure | Show raw input, ask for manual structuring |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:plan` - Plan solution for issue
+- `/issue:manage` - Interactive issue management
+- `ccw issue list` - List all issues
+- `ccw issue status <id>` - View issue details

.claude/commands/issue/plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+---
+name: plan
+description: Batch plan issue resolution using issue-plan-agent (explore + plan closed-loop)
+argument-hint: "<issue-id>[,<issue-id>,...] [--batch-size 3] --all-pending"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), SlashCommand(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Plan Command (/issue:plan)
+
+## Overview
+
+Unified planning command using **issue-plan-agent** that combines exploration and planning into a single closed-loop workflow.
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+**Generate Files:**
+1. `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl` - Solution with tasks for each issue
+
+**Return Summary:**
+```json
+{
+  "bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }],
+  "pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solutions": [...] }],
+  "conflicts": [{ "file": "...", "issues": [...] }]
+}
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria:**
+- [ ] Solution file generated for each issue
+- [ ] Single solution → auto-bound via `ccw issue bind`
+- [ ] Multiple solutions → returned for user selection
+- [ ] Tasks conform to schema: `cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/issue-task-jsonl-schema.json`
+- [ ] Each task has quantified `delivery_criteria`
+
+## Core Capabilities
+
+- **Closed-loop agent**: issue-plan-agent combines explore + plan
+- Batch processing: 1 agent processes 1-3 issues
+- ACE semantic search integrated into planning
+- Solution with executable tasks and delivery criteria
+- Automatic solution registration and binding
+
+## Storage Structure (Flat JSONL)
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/
+├── issues.jsonl              # All issues (one per line)
+├── queue.json                # Execution queue
+└── solutions/
+    ├── {issue-id}.jsonl      # Solutions for issue (one per line)
+    └── ...
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/issue:plan <issue-id>[,<issue-id>,...] [FLAGS]
+
+# Examples
+/issue:plan GH-123                    # Single issue
+/issue:plan GH-123,GH-124,GH-125      # Batch (up to 3)
+/issue:plan --all-pending             # All pending issues
+
+# Flags
+--batch-size <n>      Max issues per agent batch (default: 3)
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Issue Loading
+   ├─ Parse input (single, comma-separated, or --all-pending)
+   ├─ Load issues from .workflow/issues/issues.jsonl
+   ├─ Validate issues exist (create if needed)
+   └─ Group into batches (max 3 per batch)
+
+Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent)
+   ├─ Launch issue-plan-agent per batch
+   ├─ Agent performs:
+   │   ├─ ACE semantic search for each issue
+   │   ├─ Codebase exploration (files, patterns, dependencies)
+   │   ├─ Solution generation with task breakdown
+   │   └─ Conflict detection across issues
+   └─ Output: solution JSON per issue
+
+Phase 3: Solution Registration & Binding
+   ├─ Append solutions to solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
+   ├─ Single solution per issue → auto-bind
+   ├─ Multiple candidates → AskUserQuestion to select
+   └─ Update issues.jsonl with bound_solution_id
+
+Phase 4: Summary
+   ├─ Display bound solutions
+   ├─ Show task counts per issue
+   └─ Display next steps (/issue:queue)
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Issue Loading (IDs Only)
+
+```javascript
+const batchSize = flags.batchSize || 3;
+let issueIds = [];
+
+if (flags.allPending) {
+  // Get pending issue IDs directly via CLI
+  const ids = Bash(`ccw issue list --status pending,registered --ids`).trim();
+  issueIds = ids ? ids.split('\n').filter(Boolean) : [];
+
+  if (issueIds.length === 0) {
+    console.log('No pending issues found.');
+    return;
+  }
+  console.log(`Found ${issueIds.length} pending issues`);
+} else {
+  // Parse comma-separated issue IDs
+  issueIds = userInput.includes(',')
+    ? userInput.split(',').map(s => s.trim())
+    : [userInput.trim()];
+
+  // Create if not exists
+  for (const id of issueIds) {
+    Bash(`ccw issue init ${id} --title "Issue ${id}" 2>/dev/null || true`);
+  }
+}
+
+// Group into batches
+const batches = [];
+for (let i = 0; i < issueIds.length; i += batchSize) {
+  batches.push(issueIds.slice(i, i + batchSize));
+}
+
+console.log(`Processing ${issueIds.length} issues in ${batches.length} batch(es)`);
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: batches.map((_, i) => ({
+    content: `Plan batch ${i+1}`,
+    status: 'pending',
+    activeForm: `Planning batch ${i+1}`
+  }))
+});
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent)
+
+```javascript
+Bash(`mkdir -p .workflow/issues/solutions`);
+const pendingSelections = [];  // Collect multi-solution issues for user selection
+
+for (const [batchIndex, batch] of batches.entries()) {
+  updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'in_progress');
+
+  // Build minimal prompt - agent handles exploration, planning, and binding
+  const issuePrompt = `
+## Plan Issues
+
+**Issue IDs**: ${batch.join(', ')}
+**Project Root**: ${process.cwd()}
+
+### Steps
+1. Fetch: \`ccw issue status <id> --json\`
+2. Explore (ACE) → Plan solution
+3. Register & bind: \`ccw issue bind <id> --solution <file>\`
+
+### Generate Files
+\`.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl\` - Solution with tasks (schema: cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/issue-task-jsonl-schema.json)
+
+### Binding Rules
+- **Single solution**: Auto-bind via \`ccw issue bind <id> --solution <file>\`
+- **Multiple solutions**: Register only, return for user selection
+
+### Return Summary
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }],
+  "pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solutions": [{ "id": "...", "description": "...", "task_count": N }] }],
+  "conflicts": [{ "file": "...", "issues": [...] }]
+}
+\`\`\`
+`;
+
+  // Launch issue-plan-agent - agent writes solutions directly
+  const result = Task(
+    subagent_type="issue-plan-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,
+    description=`Explore & plan ${batch.length} issues`,
+    prompt=issuePrompt
+  );
+
+  // Parse summary from agent
+  const summary = JSON.parse(result);
+
+  // Display auto-bound solutions
+  for (const item of summary.bound || []) {
+    console.log(`✓ ${item.issue_id}: ${item.solution_id} (${item.task_count} tasks)`);
+  }
+
+  // Collect pending selections for Phase 3
+  pendingSelections.push(...(summary.pending_selection || []));
+
+  // Show conflicts
+  if (summary.conflicts?.length > 0) {
+    console.log(`⚠ Conflicts: ${summary.conflicts.map(c => c.file).join(', ')}`);
+  }
+
+  updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'completed');
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Multi-Solution Selection
+
+```javascript
+// Only handle issues where agent generated multiple solutions
+if (pendingSelections.length > 0) {
+  const answer = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: pendingSelections.map(({ issue_id, solutions }) => ({
+      question: `Select solution for ${issue_id}:`,
+      header: issue_id,
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: solutions.map(s => ({
+        label: `${s.id} (${s.task_count} tasks)`,
+        description: s.description
+      }))
+    }))
+  });
+
+  // Bind user-selected solutions
+  for (const { issue_id } of pendingSelections) {
+    const selectedId = extractSelectedSolutionId(answer, issue_id);
+    if (selectedId) {
+      Bash(`ccw issue bind ${issue_id} ${selectedId}`);
+      console.log(`✓ ${issue_id}: ${selectedId} bound`);
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Summary
+
+```javascript
+// Count planned issues via CLI
+const plannedIds = Bash(`ccw issue list --status planned --ids`).trim();
+const plannedCount = plannedIds ? plannedIds.split('\n').length : 0;
+
+console.log(`
+## Done: ${issueIds.length} issues → ${plannedCount} planned
+
+Next: \`/issue:queue\` → \`/issue:execute\`
+`);
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Issue not found | Auto-create in issues.jsonl |
+| ACE search fails | Agent falls back to ripgrep |
+| No solutions generated | Display error, suggest manual planning |
+| User cancels selection | Skip issue, continue with others |
+| File conflicts | Agent detects and suggests resolution order |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue from bound solutions
+- `/issue:execute` - Execute queue with codex
+- `ccw issue list` - List all issues
+- `ccw issue status` - View issue and solution details

.claude/commands/issue/queue.md

@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+---
+name: queue
+description: Form execution queue from bound solutions using issue-queue-agent
+argument-hint: "[--rebuild] [--issue <id>]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Queue Command (/issue:queue)
+
+## Overview
+
+Queue formation command using **issue-queue-agent** that analyzes all bound solutions, resolves conflicts, and creates an ordered execution queue.
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+**Generate Files:**
+1. `.workflow/issues/queues/{queue-id}.json` - Full queue with tasks, conflicts, groups
+2. `.workflow/issues/queues/index.json` - Update with new queue entry
+
+**Return Summary:**
+```json
+{
+  "queue_id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
+  "total_tasks": N,
+  "execution_groups": [{ "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N }],
+  "conflicts_resolved": N,
+  "issues_queued": ["GH-123", "GH-124"]
+}
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria:**
+- [ ] Queue JSON generated with valid DAG (no cycles)
+- [ ] All file conflicts resolved with rationale
+- [ ] Semantic priority calculated for all tasks
+- [ ] Execution groups assigned (parallel P* / sequential S*)
+- [ ] Issue statuses updated to `queued` via `ccw issue update`
+
+## Core Capabilities
+
+- **Agent-driven**: issue-queue-agent handles all ordering logic
+- Dependency DAG construction and cycle detection
+- File conflict detection and resolution
+- Semantic priority calculation (0.0-1.0)
+- Parallel/Sequential group assignment
+
+## Storage Structure (Queue History)
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/
+├── issues.jsonl              # All issues (one per line)
+├── queues/                   # Queue history directory
+│   ├── index.json            # Queue index (active + history)
+│   ├── {queue-id}.json       # Individual queue files
+│   └── ...
+└── solutions/
+    ├── {issue-id}.jsonl      # Solutions for issue
+    └── ...
+```
+
+### Queue Index Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "active_queue_id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
+  "queues": [
+    {
+      "id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
+      "status": "active",
+      "issue_ids": ["GH-123", "GH-124"],
+      "total_tasks": 8,
+      "completed_tasks": 3,
+      "created_at": "2025-12-27T14:30:00Z"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "QUE-20251226-100000",
+      "status": "completed",
+      "issue_ids": ["GH-120"],
+      "total_tasks": 5,
+      "completed_tasks": 5,
+      "created_at": "2025-12-26T10:00:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-12-26T12:30:00Z"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/issue:queue [FLAGS]
+
+# Examples
+/issue:queue                      # Form NEW queue from all bound solutions
+/issue:queue --issue GH-123       # Form queue for specific issue only
+/issue:queue --append GH-124      # Append to active queue
+/issue:queue --list               # List all queues (history)
+/issue:queue --switch QUE-xxx     # Switch active queue
+/issue:queue --archive            # Archive completed active queue
+
+# Flags
+--issue <id>          Form queue for specific issue only
+--append <id>         Append issue to active queue (don't create new)
+
+# CLI subcommands (ccw issue queue ...)
+ccw issue queue list                  List all queues with status
+ccw issue queue switch <queue-id>     Switch active queue
+ccw issue queue archive               Archive current queue
+ccw issue queue delete <queue-id>     Delete queue from history
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Solution Loading
+   ├─ Load issues.jsonl
+   ├─ Filter issues with bound_solution_id
+   ├─ Read solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl for each issue
+   ├─ Find bound solution by ID
+   └─ Extract tasks from bound solutions
+
+Phase 2-4: Agent-Driven Queue Formation (issue-queue-agent)
+   ├─ Launch issue-queue-agent with all tasks
+   ├─ Agent performs:
+   │   ├─ Build dependency DAG from depends_on
+   │   ├─ Detect circular dependencies
+   │   ├─ Identify file modification conflicts
+   │   ├─ Resolve conflicts using ordering rules
+   │   ├─ Calculate semantic priority (0.0-1.0)
+   │   └─ Assign execution groups (parallel/sequential)
+   └─ Output: queue JSON with ordered tasks
+
+Phase 5: Queue Output
+   ├─ Write queue.json
+   ├─ Update issue statuses in issues.jsonl
+   └─ Display queue summary
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Solution Loading
+
+```javascript
+// Load issues.jsonl
+const issuesPath = '.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl';
+const allIssues = Bash(`cat "${issuesPath}" 2>/dev/null || echo ''`)
+  .split('\n')
+  .filter(line => line.trim())
+  .map(line => JSON.parse(line));
+
+// Filter issues with bound solutions
+const plannedIssues = allIssues.filter(i =>
+  i.status === 'planned' && i.bound_solution_id
+);
+
+if (plannedIssues.length === 0) {
+  console.log('No issues with bound solutions found.');
+  console.log('Run /issue:plan first to create and bind solutions.');
+  return;
+}
+
+// Load all tasks from bound solutions
+const allTasks = [];
+for (const issue of plannedIssues) {
+  const solPath = `.workflow/issues/solutions/${issue.id}.jsonl`;
+  const solutions = Bash(`cat "${solPath}" 2>/dev/null || echo ''`)
+    .split('\n')
+    .filter(line => line.trim())
+    .map(line => JSON.parse(line));
+
+  // Find bound solution
+  const boundSol = solutions.find(s => s.id === issue.bound_solution_id);
+
+  if (!boundSol) {
+    console.log(`⚠ Bound solution ${issue.bound_solution_id} not found for ${issue.id}`);
+    continue;
+  }
+
+  for (const task of boundSol.tasks || []) {
+    allTasks.push({
+      issue_id: issue.id,
+      solution_id: issue.bound_solution_id,
+      task,
+      exploration_context: boundSol.exploration_context
+    });
+  }
+}
+
+console.log(`Loaded ${allTasks.length} tasks from ${plannedIssues.length} issues`);
+```
+
+### Phase 2-4: Agent-Driven Queue Formation
+
+```javascript
+// Build minimal prompt - agent reads schema and handles ordering
+const agentPrompt = `
+## Order Tasks
+
+**Tasks**: ${allTasks.length} from ${plannedIssues.length} issues
+**Project Root**: ${process.cwd()}
+
+### Input
+\`\`\`json
+${JSON.stringify(allTasks.map(t => ({
+  key: \`\${t.issue_id}:\${t.task.id}\`,
+  type: t.task.type,
+  file_context: t.task.file_context,
+  depends_on: t.task.depends_on
+})), null, 2)}
+\`\`\`
+
+### Steps
+1. Parse tasks: Extract task keys, types, file contexts, dependencies
+2. Build DAG: Construct dependency graph from depends_on references
+3. Detect cycles: Verify no circular dependencies exist (abort if found)
+4. Detect conflicts: Identify file modification conflicts across issues
+5. Resolve conflicts: Apply ordering rules (Create→Update→Delete, config→src→tests)
+6. Calculate priority: Compute semantic priority (0.0-1.0) for each task
+7. Assign groups: Assign parallel (P*) or sequential (S*) execution groups
+8. Generate queue: Write queue JSON with ordered tasks
+9. Update index: Update queues/index.json with new queue entry
+
+### Rules
+- **DAG Validity**: Output must be valid DAG with no circular dependencies
+- **Conflict Resolution**: All file conflicts must be resolved with rationale
+- **Ordering Priority**:
+  1. Create before Update (files must exist before modification)
+  2. Foundation before integration (config/ → src/)
+  3. Types before implementation (types/ → components/)
+  4. Core before tests (src/ → __tests__/)
+  5. Delete last (preserve dependencies until no longer needed)
+- **Parallel Safety**: Tasks in same parallel group must have no file conflicts
+- **Queue ID Format**: \`QUE-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS\` (UTC timestamp)
+
+### Generate Files
+1. \`.workflow/issues/queues/\${queueId}.json\` - Full queue (schema: cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/queue-schema.json)
+2. \`.workflow/issues/queues/index.json\` - Update with new entry
+
+### Return Summary
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "queue_id": "QUE-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS",
+  "total_tasks": N,
+  "execution_groups": [{ "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N }],
+  "conflicts_resolved": N,
+  "issues_queued": ["GH-123"]
+}
+\`\`\`
+`;
+
+const result = Task(
+  subagent_type="issue-queue-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Order ${allTasks.length} tasks`,
+  prompt=agentPrompt
+);
+
+const summary = JSON.parse(result);
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Summary & Status Update
+
+```javascript
+// Agent already generated queue files, use summary
+console.log(`
+## Queue Formed: ${summary.queue_id}
+
+**Tasks**: ${summary.total_tasks}
+**Issues**: ${summary.issues_queued.join(', ')}
+**Groups**: ${summary.execution_groups.map(g => `${g.id}(${g.count})`).join(', ')}
+**Conflicts Resolved**: ${summary.conflicts_resolved}
+
+Next: \`/issue:execute\`
+`);
+
+// Update issue statuses via CLI
+for (const issueId of summary.issues_queued) {
+  Bash(`ccw issue update ${issueId} --status queued`);
+}
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| No bound solutions | Display message, suggest /issue:plan |
+| Circular dependency | List cycles, abort queue formation |
+| Unresolved conflicts | Agent resolves using ordering rules |
+| Invalid task reference | Skip and warn |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:plan` - Plan issues and bind solutions
+- `/issue:execute` - Execute queue with codex
+- `ccw issue queue list` - View current queue

.claude/commands/memory/code-map-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,687 @@
+---
+name: code-map-memory
+description: 3-phase orchestrator: parse feature keyword → cli-explore-agent analyzes (Deep Scan dual-source) → orchestrator generates Mermaid docs + SKILL package (skips phase 2 if exists)
+argument-hint: "\"feature-keyword\" [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Code Flow Mapping Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Pure Orchestrator with Agent Delegation**: Prepares context paths and delegates code flow analysis to specialized cli-explore-agent. Orchestrator transforms agent's JSON analysis into Mermaid documentation.
+
+**Auto-Continue Workflow**: Runs fully autonomously once triggered. Each phase completes and automatically triggers the next phase.
+
+**Execution Paths**:
+- **Full Path**: All 3 phases (no existing codemap OR `--regenerate` specified)
+- **Skip Path**: Phase 1 → Phase 3 (existing codemap found AND no `--regenerate` flag)
+- **Phase 3 Always Executes**: SKILL index is always generated or updated
+
+**Agent Responsibility** (cli-explore-agent):
+- Deep code flow analysis using dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini CLI)
+- Returns structured JSON with architecture, functions, data flow, conditionals, patterns
+- NO file writing - analysis only
+
+**Orchestrator Responsibility**:
+- Provides feature keyword and analysis scope to agent
+- Transforms agent's JSON into Mermaid-enriched markdown documentation
+- Writes all files (5 docs + metadata.json + SKILL.md)
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+2. **Feature-Specific SKILL**: Each feature creates independent `.claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/` package
+3. **Specialized Agent**: Phase 2a uses cli-explore-agent for professional code analysis (Deep Scan mode)
+4. **Orchestrator Documentation**: Phase 2b transforms agent JSON into Mermaid markdown files
+5. **Auto-Continue**: After completing each phase, update TodoWrite and immediately execute next phase
+6. **No User Prompts**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
+7. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after EVERY phase completion before starting next phase
+8. **Multi-Level Detail**: Generate 4 levels: architecture → function → data → conditional
+
+---
+
+## 3-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Parse Feature Keyword & Check Existing
+
+**Goal**: Normalize feature keyword, check existing codemap, prepare for analysis
+
+**Step 1: Parse Feature Keyword**
+```bash
+# Get feature keyword from argument
+FEATURE_KEYWORD="$1"
+
+# Normalize: lowercase, spaces to hyphens
+normalized_feature=$(echo "$FEATURE_KEYWORD" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '-' | tr '_' '-')
+
+# Example: "User Authentication" → "user-authentication"
+# Example: "支付处理" → "支付处理" (keep non-ASCII)
+```
+
+**Step 2: Set Tool Preference**
+```bash
+# Default to gemini unless --tool specified
+TOOL="${tool_flag:-gemini}"
+```
+
+**Step 3: Check Existing Codemap**
+```bash
+# Define codemap directory
+CODEMAP_DIR=".claude/skills/codemap-${normalized_feature}"
+
+# Check if codemap exists
+bash(test -d "$CODEMAP_DIR" && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+
+# Count existing files
+bash(find "$CODEMAP_DIR" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Step 4: Skip Decision**
+```javascript
+if (existing_files > 0 && !regenerate_flag) {
+  SKIP_GENERATION = true
+  message = "Codemap already exists, skipping Phase 2. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+} else if (regenerate_flag) {
+  bash(rm -rf "$CODEMAP_DIR")
+  SKIP_GENERATION = false
+  message = "Regenerating codemap from scratch."
+} else {
+  SKIP_GENERATION = false
+  message = "No existing codemap found, generating new code flow analysis."
+}
+```
+
+**Output Variables**:
+- `FEATURE_KEYWORD`: Original feature keyword
+- `normalized_feature`: Normalized feature name for directory
+- `CODEMAP_DIR`: `.claude/skills/codemap-{feature}`
+- `TOOL`: CLI tool to use (gemini or qwen)
+- `SKIP_GENERATION`: Boolean - whether to skip Phase 2
+
+**TodoWrite**:
+- If skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+- If not skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Code Flow Analysis & Documentation Generation
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skipped if `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+
+**Goal**: Use cli-explore-agent for professional code analysis, then orchestrator generates Mermaid documentation
+
+**Architecture**: Phase 2a (Agent Analysis) → Phase 2b (Orchestrator Documentation)
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 2a: cli-explore-agent Analysis
+
+**Purpose**: Leverage specialized cli-explore-agent for deep code flow analysis
+
+**Agent Task Specification**:
+
+```
+Task(
+  subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
+  description: "Analyze code flow: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}",
+  prompt: "
+Perform Deep Scan analysis for feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+
+**Analysis Mode**: deep-scan (Dual-source: Bash structural scan + Gemini semantic analysis)
+
+**Analysis Objectives**:
+1. **Module Architecture**: Identify high-level module organization, interactions, and entry points
+2. **Function Call Chains**: Trace execution paths, call sequences, and parameter flows
+3. **Data Transformations**: Map data structure changes and transformation stages
+4. **Conditional Paths**: Document decision trees, branches, and error handling strategies
+5. **Design Patterns**: Discover architectural patterns and extract design intent
+
+**Scope**:
+- Feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+- CLI Tool: {TOOL} (gemini-2.5-pro or qwen coder-model)
+- File Discovery: MCP Code Index (preferred) + rg fallback
+- Target: 5-15 most relevant files
+
+**MANDATORY FIRST STEP**:
+Read: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/codemap-json-schema.json
+
+**Output**: Return JSON following schema exactly. NO FILE WRITING - return JSON analysis only.
+
+**Critical Requirements**:
+- Use Deep Scan mode: Bash (Phase 1 - precise locations) + Gemini CLI (Phase 2 - semantic understanding) + Synthesis (Phase 3 - merge with attribution)
+- Focus exclusively on {FEATURE_KEYWORD} feature flow
+- Include file:line references for ALL findings
+- Extract design intent from code structure and comments
+- NO FILE WRITING - return JSON analysis only
+- Handle tool failures gracefully (Gemini → Qwen fallback, MCP → rg fallback)
+  "
+)
+```
+
+**Agent Output**: JSON analysis result with architecture, functions, data flow, conditionals, and patterns
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 2b: Orchestrator Documentation Generation
+
+**Purpose**: Transform cli-explore-agent JSON into Mermaid-enriched documentation
+
+**Input**: Agent's JSON analysis result
+
+**Process**:
+
+1. **Parse Agent Analysis**:
+   ```javascript
+   const analysis = JSON.parse(agentResult)
+   const { feature, files_analyzed, architecture, function_calls, data_flow, conditional_logic, design_patterns } = analysis
+   ```
+
+2. **Generate Mermaid Diagrams from Structured Data**:
+
+   **a) architecture-flow.md** (~3K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert architecture.modules + architecture.interactions → Mermaid graph TD
+   const architectureMermaid = `
+   graph TD
+   ${architecture.modules.map(m => `    ${m.name}[${m.name}]`).join('\n')}
+   ${architecture.interactions.map(i => `    ${i.from} -->|${i.type}| ${i.to}`).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/architecture-flow.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: architecture
+detail: high-level module interactions
+---
+# Architecture Flow: ${feature}
+
+## Overview
+${architecture.overview}
+
+## Module Architecture
+${architecture.modules.map(m => `### ${m.name}\n- **File**: ${m.file}\n- **Role**: ${m.responsibility}\n- **Dependencies**: ${m.dependencies.join(', ')}`).join('\n\n')}
+
+## Flow Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${architectureMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Key Interactions
+${architecture.interactions.map(i => `- **${i.from} → ${i.to}**: ${i.description}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Entry Points
+${architecture.entry_points.map(e => `- **${e.function}** (${e.file}): ${e.description}`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **b) function-calls.md** (~5K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert function_calls.sequences → Mermaid sequenceDiagram
+   const sequenceMermaid = `
+   sequenceDiagram
+   ${function_calls.sequences.map(s => `    ${s.from}->>${s.to}: ${s.method}`).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/function-calls.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: function
+detail: function-level call sequences
+---
+# Function Call Chains: ${feature}
+
+## Call Sequence Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${sequenceMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Detailed Call Chains
+${function_calls.call_chains.map(chain => `
+### Chain ${chain.chain_id}: ${chain.description}
+${chain.sequence.map(fn => `- **${fn.function}** (${fn.file})\n  - Calls: ${fn.calls.join(', ')}`).join('\n')}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+## Parameters & Returns
+${function_calls.sequences.map(s => `- **${s.method}** → Returns: ${s.returns || 'void'}`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **c) data-flow.md** (~4K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert data_flow.transformations → Mermaid flowchart LR
+   const dataFlowMermaid = `
+   flowchart LR
+   ${data_flow.transformations.map((t, i) => `    Stage${i}[${t.from}] -->|${t.transformer}| Stage${i+1}[${t.to}]`).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/data-flow.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: data
+detail: data structure transformations
+---
+# Data Flow: ${feature}
+
+## Data Transformation Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${dataFlowMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Data Structures
+${data_flow.structures.map(s => `### ${s.name} (${s.stage})\n\`\`\`json\n${JSON.stringify(s.shape, null, 2)}\n\`\`\``).join('\n\n')}
+
+## Transformations
+${data_flow.transformations.map(t => `- **${t.from} → ${t.to}** via \`${t.transformer}\` (${t.file})`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **d) conditional-paths.md** (~4K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Convert conditional_logic.branches → Mermaid flowchart TD
+   const conditionalMermaid = `
+   flowchart TD
+       Start[Entry Point]
+   ${conditional_logic.branches.map((b, i) => `
+       Start --> Check${i}{${b.condition}}
+       Check${i} -->|Yes| Path${i}A[${b.true_path}]
+       Check${i} -->|No| Path${i}B[${b.false_path}]
+   `).join('\n')}
+   `
+
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/conditional-paths.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: conditional
+detail: decision trees and error paths
+---
+# Conditional Paths: ${feature}
+
+## Decision Tree
+\`\`\`mermaid
+${conditionalMermaid}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Branch Conditions
+${conditional_logic.branches.map(b => `- **${b.condition}** (${b.file})\n  - True: ${b.true_path}\n  - False: ${b.false_path}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Error Handling
+${conditional_logic.error_handling.map(e => `- **${e.error_type}**: Handler \`${e.handler}\` (${e.file}) - Recovery: ${e.recovery}`).join('\n')}
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+   **e) complete-flow.md** (~8K tokens):
+   ```javascript
+   // Integrate all Mermaid diagrams
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/complete-flow.md`,
+     content: `---
+feature: ${feature}
+level: complete
+detail: integrated multi-level view
+---
+# Complete Flow: ${feature}
+
+## Integrated Flow Diagram
+\`\`\`mermaid
+graph TB
+    subgraph Architecture
+    ${architecture.modules.map(m => `    ${m.name}[${m.name}]`).join('\n')}
+    end
+
+    subgraph "Function Calls"
+    ${function_calls.call_chains[0]?.sequence.map(fn => `    ${fn.function}`).join('\n') || ''}
+    end
+
+    subgraph "Data Flow"
+    ${data_flow.structures.map(s => `    ${s.name}[${s.name}]`).join('\n')}
+    end
+\`\`\`
+
+## Complete Trace
+[Comprehensive end-to-end documentation combining all analysis layers]
+
+## Design Patterns Identified
+${design_patterns.map(p => `- **${p.pattern}** in ${p.location}: ${p.description}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Recommendations
+${analysis.recommendations.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n')}
+
+## Cross-References
+- [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md) - High-level module structure
+- [Function Calls](./function-calls.md) - Detailed call chains
+- [Data Flow](./data-flow.md) - Data transformation stages
+- [Conditional Paths](./conditional-paths.md) - Decision trees and error handling
+`
+   })
+   ```
+
+3. **Write metadata.json**:
+   ```javascript
+   Write({
+     file_path: `${CODEMAP_DIR}/metadata.json`,
+     content: JSON.stringify({
+       feature: feature,
+       normalized_name: normalized_feature,
+       generated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+       tool_used: analysis.analysis_metadata.tool_used,
+       files_analyzed: files_analyzed.map(f => f.file),
+       analysis_summary: {
+         total_files: files_analyzed.length,
+         modules_traced: architecture.modules.length,
+         functions_traced: function_calls.call_chains.reduce((sum, c) => sum + c.sequence.length, 0),
+         patterns_discovered: design_patterns.length
+       }
+     }, null, 2)
+   })
+   ```
+
+4. **Report Phase 2 Completion**:
+   ```
+   Phase 2 Complete: Code flow analysis and documentation generated
+
+   - Agent Analysis: cli-explore-agent with {TOOL}
+   - Files Analyzed: {count}
+   - Documentation Generated: 5 markdown files + metadata.json
+   - Location: {CODEMAP_DIR}
+   ```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- cli-explore-agent task completed successfully with JSON result
+- 5 documentation files written with valid Mermaid diagrams
+- metadata.json written with analysis summary
+- All files properly formatted and cross-referenced
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Generate SKILL.md Index
+
+**Note**: This phase **ALWAYS executes** - generates or updates the SKILL index.
+
+**Goal**: Read generated flow documentation and create SKILL.md index with progressive loading
+
+**Steps**:
+
+1. **Verify Generated Files**:
+   ```bash
+   bash(find "{CODEMAP_DIR}" -name "*.md" -type f | sort)
+   ```
+
+2. **Read metadata.json**:
+   ```javascript
+   Read({CODEMAP_DIR}/metadata.json)
+   // Extract: feature, normalized_name, files_analyzed, analysis_summary
+   ```
+
+3. **Read File Headers** (optional, first 30 lines):
+   ```javascript
+   Read({CODEMAP_DIR}/architecture-flow.md, limit: 30)
+   Read({CODEMAP_DIR}/function-calls.md, limit: 30)
+   // Extract overview and diagram counts
+   ```
+
+4. **Generate SKILL.md Index**:
+
+   Template structure:
+   ```yaml
+   ---
+   name: codemap-{normalized_feature}
+   description: Code flow mapping for {FEATURE_KEYWORD} feature (located at {project_path}). Load this SKILL when analyzing, tracing, or understanding {FEATURE_KEYWORD} execution flow, especially when no relevant context exists in memory.
+   version: 1.0.0
+   generated_at: {ISO_TIMESTAMP}
+   ---
+   # Code Flow Map: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+
+   ## Feature: `{FEATURE_KEYWORD}`
+
+   **Analysis Date**: {DATE}
+   **Tool Used**: {TOOL}
+   **Files Analyzed**: {COUNT}
+
+   ## Progressive Loading
+
+   ### Level 0: Quick Overview (~2K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md) - High-level module interactions
+
+   ### Level 1: Core Flows (~10K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md) - Module architecture
+   - [Function Calls](./function-calls.md) - Function call chains
+
+   ### Level 2: Complete Analysis (~20K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md)
+   - [Function Calls](./function-calls.md)
+   - [Data Flow](./data-flow.md) - Data transformations
+
+   ### Level 3: Deep Dive (~30K tokens)
+   - [Architecture Flow](./architecture-flow.md)
+   - [Function Calls](./function-calls.md)
+   - [Data Flow](./data-flow.md)
+   - [Conditional Paths](./conditional-paths.md) - Branches and error handling
+   - [Complete Flow](./complete-flow.md) - Integrated comprehensive view
+
+   ## Usage
+
+   Load this SKILL package when:
+   - Analyzing {FEATURE_KEYWORD} implementation
+   - Tracing execution flow for debugging
+   - Understanding code dependencies
+   - Planning refactoring or enhancements
+
+   ## Analysis Summary
+
+   - **Modules Traced**: {modules_traced}
+   - **Functions Traced**: {functions_traced}
+   - **Files Analyzed**: {total_files}
+
+   ## Mermaid Diagrams Included
+
+   - Architecture flow diagram (graph TD)
+   - Function call sequence diagram (sequenceDiagram)
+   - Data transformation flowchart (flowchart LR)
+   - Conditional decision tree (flowchart TD)
+   - Complete integrated diagram (graph TB)
+   ```
+
+5. **Write SKILL.md**:
+   ```javascript
+   Write({
+     file_path: `{CODEMAP_DIR}/SKILL.md`,
+     content: generatedIndexMarkdown
+   })
+   ```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- SKILL.md index written
+- All documentation files verified
+- Progressive loading levels (0-3) properly structured
+- Mermaid diagram references included
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
+
+**Final Report**:
+```
+Code Flow Mapping Complete
+
+Feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
+Location: .claude/skills/codemap-{normalized_feature}/
+
+Files Generated:
+- SKILL.md (index)
+- architecture-flow.md (with Mermaid diagram)
+- function-calls.md (with Mermaid sequence diagram)
+- data-flow.md (with Mermaid flowchart)
+- conditional-paths.md (with Mermaid decision tree)
+- complete-flow.md (with integrated Mermaid diagram)
+- metadata.json
+
+Analysis:
+- Files analyzed: {count}
+- Modules traced: {count}
+- Functions traced: {count}
+
+Usage: Skill(command: "codemap-{normalized_feature}")
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### TodoWrite Patterns
+
+**Initialization** (Before Phase 1):
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Parsing feature keyword"},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing code flow"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL index"}
+]})
+```
+
+**Full Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = false):
+```javascript
+// After Phase 1
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "in_progress", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", ...}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 2
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
+]})
+
+// After Phase 3
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", ...}
+]})
+```
+
+**Skip Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = true):
+```javascript
+// After Phase 1 (skip Phase 2)
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse feature keyword and check existing", "status": "completed", ...},
+  {"content": "Agent analyzes code flow and generates files", "status": "completed", ...},  // Skipped
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
+]})
+```
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+**Full Path**:
+```
+User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (parse) → Phase 2 (agent analyzes) → Phase 3 (write index) → Report
+```
+
+**Skip Path**:
+```
+User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (detect existing) → Phase 3 (update index) → Report
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase 1 Errors**:
+- Empty feature keyword: Report error, ask user to provide feature description
+- Invalid characters: Normalize and continue
+
+**Phase 2 Errors (Agent)**:
+- Agent task fails: Retry once, report if fails again
+- No files discovered: Warn user, ask for more specific feature keyword
+- CLI failures: Agent handles internally with retries
+- Invalid Mermaid syntax: Agent validates before writing
+
+**Phase 3 Errors**:
+- Write failures: Report which files failed
+- Missing files: Note in SKILL.md, suggest regeneration
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:code-map-memory "feature-keyword" [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]
+```
+
+**Arguments**:
+- **"feature-keyword"**: Feature or flow to analyze (required)
+  - Examples: `"user authentication"`, `"payment processing"`, `"数据导入流程"`
+  - Can be English, Chinese, or mixed
+  - Spaces and underscores normalized to hyphens
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate existing codemap (deletes and recreates)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool for analysis (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive flow analysis with gemini-2.5-pro
+  - `qwen`: Alternative with coder-model
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+**Generated File Structure** (for all examples):
+```
+.claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/
+├── SKILL.md                    # Index (Phase 3)
+├── architecture-flow.md        # Agent (Phase 2) - High-level flow
+├── function-calls.md           # Agent (Phase 2) - Function chains
+├── data-flow.md                # Agent (Phase 2) - Data transformations
+├── conditional-paths.md        # Agent (Phase 2) - Branches & errors
+├── complete-flow.md            # Agent (Phase 2) - Integrated view
+└── metadata.json               # Agent (Phase 2)
+```
+
+### Example 1: User Authentication Flow
+
+```bash
+/memory:code-map-memory "user authentication"
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Normalizes to "user-authentication", checks existing codemap
+2. Phase 2: Agent discovers auth-related files, executes CLI analysis, generates 5 flow docs with Mermaid
+3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index with progressive loading
+
+**Output**: `.claude/skills/codemap-user-authentication/` with 6 files + metadata
+
+
+### Example 3: Regenerate with Qwen
+
+```bash
+/memory:code-map-memory "payment processing" --regenerate --tool qwen
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Deletes existing codemap due to --regenerate
+2. Phase 2: Agent uses qwen with coder-model for fresh analysis
+3. Phase 3: Generates updated SKILL.md
+
+---
+
+
+## Architecture
+
+```
+code-map-memory (orchestrator)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Parse & Check (bash commands, skip decision)
+  ├─ Phase 2: Code Analysis & Documentation (skippable)
+  │   ├─ Phase 2a: cli-explore-agent Analysis
+  │   │   └─ Deep Scan: Bash structural + Gemini semantic → JSON
+  │   └─ Phase 2b: Orchestrator Documentation
+  │       └─ Transform JSON → 5 Mermaid markdown files + metadata.json
+  └─ Phase 3: Write SKILL.md (index generation, always runs)
+
+Output: .claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/
+```

.claude/commands/memory/compact.md

@@ -0,0 +1,383 @@
+---
+name: compact
+description: Compact current session memory into structured text for session recovery, extracting objective/plan/files/decisions/constraints/state, and save via MCP core_memory tool
+argument-hint: "[optional: session description]"
+allowed-tools: mcp__ccw-tools__core_memory(*), Read(*)
+examples:
+  - /memory:compact
+  - /memory:compact "completed core-memory module"
+---
+
+# Memory Compact Command (/memory:compact)
+
+## 1. Overview
+
+The `memory:compact` command **compresses current session working memory** into structured text optimized for **session recovery**, extracts critical information, and saves it to persistent storage via MCP `core_memory` tool.
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Session Recovery First**: Capture everything needed to resume work seamlessly
+- **Minimize Re-exploration**: Include file paths, decisions, and state to avoid redundant analysis
+- **Preserve Train of Thought**: Keep notes and hypotheses for complex debugging
+- **Actionable State**: Record last action result and known issues
+
+## 2. Parameters
+
+- `"session description"` (Optional): Session description to supplement objective
+  - Example: "completed core-memory module"
+  - Example: "debugging JWT refresh - suspected memory leak"
+
+## 3. Structured Output Format
+
+```markdown
+## Session ID
+[WFS-ID if workflow session active, otherwise (none)]
+
+## Project Root
+[Absolute path to project root, e.g., D:\Claude_dms3]
+
+## Objective
+[High-level goal - the "North Star" of this session]
+
+## Execution Plan
+[CRITICAL: Embed the LATEST plan in its COMPLETE and DETAILED form]
+
+### Source: [workflow | todo | user-stated | inferred]
+
+<details>
+<summary>Full Execution Plan (Click to expand)</summary>
+
+[PRESERVE COMPLETE PLAN VERBATIM - DO NOT SUMMARIZE]
+- ALL phases, tasks, subtasks
+- ALL file paths (absolute)
+- ALL dependencies and prerequisites
+- ALL acceptance criteria
+- ALL status markers ([x] done, [ ] pending)
+- ALL notes and context
+
+Example:
+## Phase 1: Setup
+- [x] Initialize project structure
+  - Created D:\Claude_dms3\src\core\index.ts
+  - Added dependencies: lodash, zod
+- [ ] Configure TypeScript
+  - Update tsconfig.json for strict mode
+
+## Phase 2: Implementation
+- [ ] Implement core API
+  - Target: D:\Claude_dms3\src\api\handler.ts
+  - Dependencies: Phase 1 complete
+  - Acceptance: All tests pass
+
+</details>
+
+## Working Files (Modified)
+[Absolute paths to actively modified files]
+- D:\Claude_dms3\src\file1.ts (role: main implementation)
+- D:\Claude_dms3\tests\file1.test.ts (role: unit tests)
+
+## Reference Files (Read-Only)
+[Absolute paths to context files - NOT modified but essential for understanding]
+- D:\Claude_dms3\.claude\CLAUDE.md (role: project instructions)
+- D:\Claude_dms3\src\types\index.ts (role: type definitions)
+- D:\Claude_dms3\package.json (role: dependencies)
+
+## Last Action
+[Last significant action and its result/status]
+
+## Decisions
+- [Decision]: [Reasoning]
+- [Decision]: [Reasoning]
+
+## Constraints
+- [User-specified limitation or preference]
+
+## Dependencies
+- [Added/changed packages or environment requirements]
+
+## Known Issues
+- [Deferred bug or edge case]
+
+## Changes Made
+- [Completed modification]
+
+## Pending
+- [Next step] or (none)
+
+## Notes
+[Unstructured thoughts, hypotheses, debugging trails]
+```
+
+## 4. Field Definitions
+
+| Field | Purpose | Recovery Value |
+|-------|---------|----------------|
+| **Session ID** | Workflow session identifier (WFS-*) | Links memory to specific stateful task execution |
+| **Project Root** | Absolute path to project directory | Enables correct path resolution in new sessions |
+| **Objective** | Ultimate goal of the session | Prevents losing track of broader feature |
+| **Execution Plan** | Complete plan from any source (verbatim) | Preserves full planning context, avoids re-planning |
+| **Working Files** | Actively modified files (absolute paths) | Immediately identifies where work was happening |
+| **Reference Files** | Read-only context files (absolute paths) | Eliminates re-exploration for critical context |
+| **Last Action** | Final tool output/status | Immediate state awareness (success/failure) |
+| **Decisions** | Architectural choices + reasoning | Prevents re-litigating settled decisions |
+| **Constraints** | User-imposed limitations | Maintains personalized coding style |
+| **Dependencies** | Package/environment changes | Prevents missing dependency errors |
+| **Known Issues** | Deferred bugs/edge cases | Ensures issues aren't forgotten |
+| **Changes Made** | Completed modifications | Clear record of what was done |
+| **Pending** | Next steps | Immediate action items |
+| **Notes** | Hypotheses, debugging trails | Preserves "train of thought" |
+
+## 5. Execution Flow
+
+### Step 1: Analyze Current Session
+
+Extract the following from conversation history:
+
+```javascript
+const sessionAnalysis = {
+  sessionId: "",       // WFS-* if workflow session active, null otherwise
+  projectRoot: "",     // Absolute path: D:\Claude_dms3
+  objective: "",       // High-level goal (1-2 sentences)
+  executionPlan: {
+    source: "workflow" | "todo" | "user-stated" | "inferred",
+    content: ""        // Full plan content - ALWAYS preserve COMPLETE and DETAILED form
+  },
+  workingFiles: [],    // {absolutePath, role} - modified files
+  referenceFiles: [],  // {absolutePath, role} - read-only context files
+  lastAction: "",      // Last significant action + result
+  decisions: [],       // {decision, reasoning}
+  constraints: [],     // User-specified limitations
+  dependencies: [],    // Added/changed packages
+  knownIssues: [],     // Deferred bugs
+  changesMade: [],     // Completed modifications
+  pending: [],         // Next steps
+  notes: ""            // Unstructured thoughts
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2: Generate Structured Text
+
+```javascript
+// Helper: Generate execution plan section
+const generateExecutionPlan = (plan) => {
+  const sourceLabels = {
+    'workflow': 'workflow (IMPL_PLAN.md)',
+    'todo': 'todo (TodoWrite)',
+    'user-stated': 'user-stated',
+    'inferred': 'inferred'
+  };
+
+  // CRITICAL: Preserve complete plan content verbatim - DO NOT summarize
+  return `### Source: ${sourceLabels[plan.source] || plan.source}
+
+<details>
+<summary>Full Execution Plan (Click to expand)</summary>
+
+${plan.content}
+
+</details>`;
+};
+
+const structuredText = `## Session ID
+${sessionAnalysis.sessionId || '(none)'}
+
+## Project Root
+${sessionAnalysis.projectRoot}
+
+## Objective
+${sessionAnalysis.objective}
+
+## Execution Plan
+${generateExecutionPlan(sessionAnalysis.executionPlan)}
+
+## Working Files (Modified)
+${sessionAnalysis.workingFiles.map(f => `- ${f.absolutePath} (role: ${f.role})`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Reference Files (Read-Only)
+${sessionAnalysis.referenceFiles.map(f => `- ${f.absolutePath} (role: ${f.role})`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Last Action
+${sessionAnalysis.lastAction}
+
+## Decisions
+${sessionAnalysis.decisions.map(d => `- ${d.decision}: ${d.reasoning}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Constraints
+${sessionAnalysis.constraints.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Dependencies
+${sessionAnalysis.dependencies.map(d => `- ${d}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Known Issues
+${sessionAnalysis.knownIssues.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Changes Made
+${sessionAnalysis.changesMade.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Pending
+${sessionAnalysis.pending.length > 0
+  ? sessionAnalysis.pending.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n')
+  : '(none)'}
+
+## Notes
+${sessionAnalysis.notes || '(none)'}`
+```
+
+### Step 3: Import to Core Memory via MCP
+
+Use the MCP `core_memory` tool to save the structured text:
+
+```javascript
+mcp__ccw-tools__core_memory({
+  operation: "import",
+  text: structuredText
+})
+```
+
+Or via CLI (pipe structured text to import):
+
+```bash
+# Write structured text to temp file, then import
+echo "$structuredText" | ccw core-memory import
+
+# Or from a file
+ccw core-memory import --file /path/to/session-memory.md
+```
+
+**Response Format**:
+```json
+{
+  "operation": "import",
+  "id": "CMEM-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS",
+  "message": "Created memory: CMEM-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS"
+}
+```
+
+### Step 4: Report Recovery ID
+
+After successful import, **clearly display the Recovery ID** to the user:
+
+```
+╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
+║  ✓ Session Memory Saved                                                    ║
+║                                                                            ║
+║  Recovery ID: CMEM-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS                                         ║
+║                                                                            ║
+║  To restore: "Please import memory <ID>"                                   ║
+║  (MCP: core_memory export | CLI: ccw core-memory export --id <ID>)         ║
+╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
+```
+
+## 6. Quality Checklist
+
+Before generating:
+- [ ] Session ID captured if workflow session active (WFS-*)
+- [ ] Project Root is absolute path (e.g., D:\Claude_dms3)
+- [ ] Objective clearly states the "North Star" goal
+- [ ] Execution Plan: COMPLETE plan preserved VERBATIM (no summarization)
+- [ ] Plan Source: Clearly identified (workflow | todo | user-stated | inferred)
+- [ ] Plan Details: ALL phases, tasks, file paths, dependencies, status markers included
+- [ ] All file paths are ABSOLUTE (not relative)
+- [ ] Working Files: 3-8 modified files with roles
+- [ ] Reference Files: Key context files (CLAUDE.md, types, configs)
+- [ ] Last Action captures final state (success/failure)
+- [ ] Decisions include reasoning, not just choices
+- [ ] Known Issues separates deferred from forgotten bugs
+- [ ] Notes preserve debugging hypotheses if any
+
+## 7. Path Resolution Rules
+
+### Project Root Detection
+1. Check current working directory from environment
+2. Look for project markers: `.git/`, `package.json`, `.claude/`
+3. Use the topmost directory containing these markers
+
+### Absolute Path Conversion
+```javascript
+// Convert relative to absolute
+const toAbsolutePath = (relativePath, projectRoot) => {
+  if (path.isAbsolute(relativePath)) return relativePath;
+  return path.join(projectRoot, relativePath);
+};
+
+// Example: "src/api/auth.ts" → "D:\Claude_dms3\src\api\auth.ts"
+```
+
+### Reference File Categories
+| Category | Examples | Priority |
+|----------|----------|----------|
+| Project Config | `.claude/CLAUDE.md`, `package.json`, `tsconfig.json` | High |
+| Type Definitions | `src/types/*.ts`, `*.d.ts` | High |
+| Related Modules | Parent/sibling modules with shared interfaces | Medium |
+| Test Files | Corresponding test files for modified code | Medium |
+| Documentation | `README.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md` | Low |
+
+## 8. Plan Detection (Priority Order)
+
+### Priority 1: Workflow Session (IMPL_PLAN.md)
+```javascript
+// Check for active workflow session
+const manifest = await mcp__ccw-tools__session_manager({
+  operation: "list",
+  location: "active"
+});
+
+if (manifest.sessions?.length > 0) {
+  const session = manifest.sessions[0];
+  const plan = await mcp__ccw-tools__session_manager({
+    operation: "read",
+    session_id: session.id,
+    content_type: "plan"
+  });
+  sessionAnalysis.sessionId = session.id;
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "workflow";
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = plan.content;
+}
+```
+
+### Priority 2: TodoWrite (Current Session Todos)
+```javascript
+// Extract from conversation - look for TodoWrite tool calls
+// Preserve COMPLETE todo list with all details
+const todos = extractTodosFromConversation();
+if (todos.length > 0) {
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "todo";
+  // Format todos with full context - preserve status markers
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = todos.map(t =>
+    `- [${t.status === 'completed' ? 'x' : t.status === 'in_progress' ? '>' : ' '}] ${t.content}`
+  ).join('\n');
+}
+```
+
+### Priority 3: User-Stated Plan
+```javascript
+// Look for explicit plan statements in user messages:
+// - "Here's my plan: 1. ... 2. ... 3. ..."
+// - "I want to: first..., then..., finally..."
+// - Numbered or bulleted lists describing steps
+const userPlan = extractUserStatedPlan();
+if (userPlan) {
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "user-stated";
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = userPlan;
+}
+```
+
+### Priority 4: Inferred Plan
+```javascript
+// If no explicit plan, infer from:
+// - Task description and breakdown discussion
+// - Sequence of actions taken
+// - Outstanding work mentioned
+const inferredPlan = inferPlanFromDiscussion();
+if (inferredPlan) {
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "inferred";
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = inferredPlan;
+}
+```
+
+## 9. Notes
+
+- **Timing**: Execute at task completion or before context switch
+- **Frequency**: Once per independent task or milestone
+- **Recovery**: New session can immediately continue with full context
+- **Knowledge Graph**: Entity relationships auto-extracted for visualization
+- **Absolute Paths**: Critical for cross-session recovery on different machines

.claude/commands/memory/docs-full-cli.md

@@ -0,0 +1,471 @@
+---
+name: docs-full-cli
+description: Generate full project documentation using CLI execution (Layer 3→1) with batched agents (4 modules/agent) and gemini→qwen→codex fallback, <20 modules uses direct parallel
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]"
+---
+
+# Full Documentation Generation - CLI Mode (/memory:docs-full-cli)
+
+## Overview
+
+Orchestrates project-wide documentation generation using CLI-based execution with batched agents and automatic tool fallback.
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `path`: Target directory (default: current directory)
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`: Primary tool (default: gemini)
+
+**Execution Flow**: Discovery → Plan Presentation → Execution → Verification
+
+## 3-Layer Architecture & Auto-Strategy Selection
+
+### Layer Definition & Strategy Assignment
+
+| Layer | Depth | Strategy | Purpose | Context Pattern |
+|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------------|
+| **Layer 3** (Deepest) | ≥3 | `full` | Generate docs for all subdirectories with code | `@**/*` (all files) |
+| **Layer 2** (Middle) | 1-2 | `single` | Current dir + child docs | `@*/API.md @*/README.md @*.{ts,tsx,js,...}` |
+| **Layer 1** (Top) | 0 | `single` | Current dir + child docs | `@*/API.md @*/README.md @*.{ts,tsx,js,...}` |
+
+**Generation Direction**: Layer 3 → Layer 2 → Layer 1 (bottom-up dependency flow)
+
+**Strategy Auto-Selection**: Strategies are automatically determined by directory depth - no user configuration needed.
+
+### Strategy Details
+
+#### Full Strategy (Layer 3 Only)
+- **Use Case**: Deepest directories with comprehensive file coverage
+- **Behavior**: Generates API.md + README.md for current directory AND subdirectories containing code
+- **Context**: All files in current directory tree (`@**/*`)
+- **Output**: `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/{path}/API.md` + `README.md`
+
+
+#### Single Strategy (Layers 1-2)
+- **Use Case**: Upper layers that aggregate from existing documentation
+- **Behavior**: Generates API.md + README.md only in current directory
+- **Context**: Direct children docs + current directory code files
+- **Output**: `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/{path}/API.md` + `README.md`
+
+### Example Flow
+```
+src/auth/handlers/ (depth 3) → FULL STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @**/* (all files in handlers/ and subdirs)
+  GENERATES: .workflow/docs/project/src/auth/handlers/{API.md,README.md} + subdirs
+  ↓
+src/auth/ (depth 2) → SINGLE STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/API.md @*/README.md @*.ts (handlers docs + current code)
+  GENERATES: .workflow/docs/project/src/auth/{API.md,README.md} only
+  ↓
+src/ (depth 1) → SINGLE STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/API.md @*/README.md (auth docs, utils docs)
+  GENERATES: .workflow/docs/project/src/{API.md,README.md} only
+  ↓
+./ (depth 0) → SINGLE STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/API.md @*/README.md (src docs, tests docs)
+  GENERATES: .workflow/docs/project/{API.md,README.md} only
+```
+
+## Core Execution Rules
+
+1. **Analyze First**: Module discovery + folder classification before generation
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Execution Strategy**:
+   - **<20 modules**: Direct parallel execution (max 4 concurrent per layer)
+   - **≥20 modules**: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent, 73% overhead reduction)
+4. **Tool Fallback**: Auto-retry with fallback tools on failure
+5. **Layer Sequential**: Process layers 3→2→1 (bottom-up), parallel batches within layer
+6. **Safety Check**: Verify only docs files modified in .workflow/docs/
+7. **Layer-based Grouping**: Group modules by LAYER (not depth) for execution
+
+## Tool Fallback Hierarchy
+
+```javascript
+--tool gemini  →  [gemini, qwen, codex]  // default
+--tool qwen    →  [qwen, gemini, codex]
+--tool codex   →  [codex, gemini, qwen]
+```
+
+**Trigger**: Non-zero exit code from generation script
+
+| Tool   | Best For                       | Fallback To    |
+|--------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| gemini | Documentation, patterns        | qwen → codex   |
+| qwen   | Architecture, system design    | gemini → codex |
+| codex  | Implementation, code quality   | gemini → qwen  |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Analysis
+
+```javascript
+// Get project metadata
+Bash({command: "pwd && basename \"$(pwd)\" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd", run_in_background: false});
+
+// Get module structure with classification
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}'", run_in_background: false});
+
+// OR with path parameter
+Bash({command: "cd <target-path> && ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}'", run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|type:<code|navigation>|...` to extract module paths, types, and count.
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/vendor based on project tech stack.
+
+### Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**For <20 modules**:
+```
+Documentation Generation Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Total: 7 modules
+  Execution: Direct parallel (< 20 modules threshold)
+  Project: myproject
+  Output: .workflow/docs/myproject/
+
+  Will generate docs for:
+  - ./core/interfaces (12 files, type: code) - depth 2 [Layer 2] - single strategy
+  - ./core (22 files, type: code) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single strategy
+  - ./models (9 files, type: code) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single strategy
+  - ./utils (12 files, type: navigation) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single strategy
+  - . (5 files, type: code) - depth 0 [Layer 1] - single strategy
+
+  Documentation Strategy (Auto-Selected):
+  - Layer 2 (depth 1-2): API.md + README.md (current dir only, reference child docs)
+  - Layer 1 (depth 0): API.md + README.md (current dir only, reference child docs)
+
+  Output Structure:
+  - Code folders: API.md + README.md
+  - Navigation folders: README.md only
+
+  Auto-skipped: ./tests, __pycache__, node_modules (15 paths)
+  Execution order: Layer 2 → Layer 1
+  Estimated time: ~5-10 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**For ≥20 modules**:
+```
+Documentation Generation Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Total: 31 modules
+  Execution: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent)
+  Project: myproject
+  Output: .workflow/docs/myproject/
+
+  Will generate docs for:
+  - ./src/features/auth (12 files, type: code) - depth 3 [Layer 3] - full strategy
+  - ./.claude/commands/cli (6 files, type: code) - depth 3 [Layer 3] - full strategy
+  - ./src/utils (8 files, type: code) - depth 2 [Layer 2] - single strategy
+  ...
+
+  Documentation Strategy (Auto-Selected):
+  - Layer 3 (depth ≥3): API.md + README.md (all subdirs with code)
+  - Layer 2 (depth 1-2): API.md + README.md (current dir only)
+  - Layer 1 (depth 0): API.md + README.md (current dir only)
+
+  Output Structure:
+  - Code folders: API.md + README.md
+  - Navigation folders: README.md only
+
+  Auto-skipped: ./tests, __pycache__, node_modules (15 paths)
+  Execution order: Layer 3 → Layer 2 → Layer 1
+
+  Agent allocation (by LAYER):
+  - Layer 3 (14 modules, depth ≥3): 4 agents [4, 4, 4, 2]
+  - Layer 2 (15 modules, depth 1-2): 4 agents [4, 4, 4, 3]
+  - Layer 1 (2 modules, depth 0): 1 agent [2]
+
+  Estimated time: ~15-25 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+### Phase 3A: Direct Execution (<20 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Parallel execution within layer (max 4 concurrent), no agent overhead.
+
+**CRITICAL**: All Bash commands use `run_in_background: false` for synchronous execution.
+
+```javascript
+let project_name = detect_project_name();
+
+for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
+  if (modules_by_layer[layer].length === 0) continue;
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_layer[layer], 4);
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    let parallel_tasks = batch.map(module => {
+      return async () => {
+        let strategy = module.depth >= 3 ? "full" : "single";
+        for (let tool of tool_order) {
+          Bash({
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"${strategy}","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+            run_in_background: false
+          });
+          if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+            report(`✅ ${module.path} (Layer ${layer}) docs generated with ${tool}`);
+            return true;
+          }
+        }
+        report(`❌ FAILED: ${module.path} (Layer ${layer}) failed all tools`);
+        return false;
+      };
+    });
+    await Promise.all(parallel_tasks.map(task => task()));
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3B: Agent Batch Execution (≥20 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Batch modules into groups of 4, spawn memory-bridge agents per batch.
+
+```javascript
+// Group modules by LAYER and batch within each layer
+let modules_by_layer = group_by_layer(module_list);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+let project_name = detect_project_name();
+
+for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
+  if (modules_by_layer[layer].length === 0) continue;
+
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_layer[layer], 4);
+  let worker_tasks = [];
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    worker_tasks.push(
+      Task(
+        subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+        description=`Generate docs for ${batch.length} modules in Layer ${layer}`,
+        prompt=generate_batch_worker_prompt(batch, tool_order, layer, project_name)
+      )
+    );
+  }
+
+  await parallel_execute(worker_tasks);
+}
+```
+
+**Batch Worker Prompt Template**:
+```
+PURPOSE: Generate documentation for assigned modules with tool fallback
+
+TASK: Generate API.md + README.md for assigned modules using specified strategies.
+
+PROJECT: {{project_name}}
+OUTPUT: .workflow/docs/{{project_name}}/
+
+MODULES:
+{{module_path_1}} (strategy: {{strategy_1}}, type: {{folder_type_1}})
+{{module_path_2}} (strategy: {{strategy_2}}, type: {{folder_type_2}})
+...
+
+TOOLS (try in order): {{tool_1}}, {{tool_2}}, {{tool_3}}
+
+EXECUTION SCRIPT: ccw tool exec generate_module_docs
+  - Accepts strategy parameter: full | single
+  - Accepts folder type detection: code | navigation
+  - Tool execution via direct CLI commands (gemini/qwen/codex)
+  - Output path: .workflow/docs/{{project_name}}/{module_path}/
+
+EXECUTION FLOW (for each module):
+  1. Tool fallback loop (exit on first success):
+     for tool in {{tool_1}} {{tool_2}} {{tool_3}}; do
+       Bash({
+         command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"{{strategy}}","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+         run_in_background: false
+       })
+       exit_code=$?
+
+       if [ $exit_code -eq 0 ]; then
+         report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with $tool"
+         break
+       else
+         report "⚠️  {{module_path}} failed with $tool, trying next..."
+         continue
+       fi
+     done
+
+  2. Handle complete failure (all tools failed):
+     if [ $exit_code -ne 0 ]; then
+       report "❌ FAILED: {{module_path}} - all tools exhausted"
+       # Continue to next module (do not abort batch)
+     fi
+
+FOLDER TYPE HANDLING:
+  - code: Generate API.md + README.md
+  - navigation: Generate README.md only
+
+FAILURE HANDLING:
+  - Module-level isolation: One module's failure does not affect others
+  - Exit code detection: Non-zero exit code triggers next tool
+  - Exhaustion reporting: Log modules where all tools failed
+  - Batch continuation: Always process remaining modules
+
+REPORTING FORMAT:
+  Per-module status:
+    ✅ path/to/module docs generated with {tool}
+    ⚠️  path/to/module failed with {tool}, trying next...
+    ❌ FAILED: path/to/module - all tools exhausted
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Project-Level Documentation
+
+**After all module documentation is generated, create project-level documentation files.**
+
+```javascript
+let project_name = detect_project_name();
+let project_root = get_project_root();
+
+// Step 1: Generate Project README
+report("Generating project README.md...");
+for (let tool of tool_order) {
+  Bash({
+    command: `cd ${project_root} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"project-readme","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  });
+  if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+    report(`✅ Project README generated with ${tool}`);
+    break;
+  }
+}
+
+// Step 2: Generate Architecture & Examples
+report("Generating ARCHITECTURE.md and EXAMPLES.md...");
+for (let tool of tool_order) {
+  Bash({
+    command: `cd ${project_root} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"project-architecture","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  });
+  if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+    report(`✅ Architecture docs generated with ${tool}`);
+    break;
+  }
+}
+
+// Step 3: Generate HTTP API documentation (if API routes detected)
+Bash({command: 'rg "router\\.|@Get|@Post" -g "*.{ts,js,py}" 2>/dev/null && echo "API_FOUND" || echo "NO_API"', run_in_background: false});
+if (bash_result.stdout.includes("API_FOUND")) {
+  report("Generating HTTP API documentation...");
+  for (let tool of tool_order) {
+    Bash({
+      command: `cd ${project_root} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"http-api","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+      run_in_background: false
+    });
+    if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+      report(`✅ HTTP API docs generated with ${tool}`);
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Expected Output**:
+```
+Project-Level Documentation:
+  ✅ README.md (project root overview)
+  ✅ ARCHITECTURE.md (system design)
+  ✅ EXAMPLES.md (usage examples)
+  ✅ api/README.md (HTTP API reference) [optional]
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Verification
+
+```javascript
+// Check documentation files created
+Bash({command: 'find .workflow/docs -type f -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l', run_in_background: false});
+
+// Display structure
+Bash({command: 'tree -L 3 .workflow/docs/', run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Result Summary**:
+```
+Documentation Generation Summary:
+  Total: 31 | Success: 29 | Failed: 2
+  Tool usage: gemini: 25, qwen: 4, codex: 0
+  Failed: path1, path2
+
+  Generated documentation:
+    .workflow/docs/myproject/
+    ├── src/
+    │   ├── auth/
+    │   │   ├── API.md
+    │   │   └── README.md
+    │   └── utils/
+    │       └── README.md
+    └── README.md
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Batch Worker**: Tool fallback per module, batch isolation, clear status reporting
+**Coordinator**: Invalid path abort, user decline handling, verification with cleanup
+**Fallback Triggers**: Non-zero exit code, script timeout, unexpected output
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/docs/{project_name}/
+├── src/                           # Mirrors source structure
+│   ├── modules/
+│   │   ├── README.md              # Navigation
+│   │   ├── auth/
+│   │   │   ├── API.md             # API signatures
+│   │   │   ├── README.md          # Module docs
+│   │   │   └── middleware/
+│   │   │       ├── API.md
+│   │   │       └── README.md
+│   │   └── api/
+│   │       ├── API.md
+│   │       └── README.md
+│   └── utils/
+│       └── README.md
+├── lib/
+│   └── core/
+│       ├── API.md
+│       └── README.md
+├── README.md                      # ✨ Project root overview (auto-generated)
+├── ARCHITECTURE.md                # ✨ System design (auto-generated)
+├── EXAMPLES.md                    # ✨ Usage examples (auto-generated)
+└── api/                           # ✨ Optional (auto-generated if HTTP API detected)
+    └── README.md                  # HTTP API reference
+```
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Full project documentation generation
+/memory:docs-full-cli
+
+# Target specific directory
+/memory:docs-full-cli src/features/auth
+/memory:docs-full-cli .claude
+
+# Use specific tool
+/memory:docs-full-cli --tool qwen
+/memory:docs-full-cli src --tool qwen
+```
+
+## Key Advantages
+
+- **Efficiency**: 30 modules → 8 agents (73% reduction from sequential)
+- **Resilience**: 3-tier tool fallback per module
+- **Performance**: Parallel batches, no concurrency limits
+- **Observability**: Per-module tool usage, batch-level metrics
+- **Automation**: Zero configuration - strategy auto-selected by directory depth
+- **Path Mirroring**: Clear 1:1 mapping between source and documentation structure
+
+## Template Reference
+
+Templates used from `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/`:
+- `api.txt`: Code API documentation (Part A: Code API, Part B: HTTP API)
+- `module-readme.txt`: Module purpose, usage, dependencies
+- `folder-navigation.txt`: Navigation README for folders with subdirectories
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/memory:docs` - Agent-based documentation planning workflow
+- `/memory:docs-related-cli` - Update docs for changed modules only
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute documentation tasks (when using agent mode)

.claude/commands/memory/docs-related-cli.md

@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+---
+name: docs-related-cli
+description: Generate/update documentation for git-changed modules using CLI execution with batched agents (4 modules/agent) and gemini→qwen→codex fallback, <15 modules uses direct parallel
+argument-hint: "[--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]"
+---
+
+# Related Documentation Generation - CLI Mode (/memory:docs-related-cli)
+
+## Overview
+
+Orchestrates context-aware documentation generation/update for changed modules using CLI-based execution with batched agents and automatic tool fallback (gemini→qwen→codex).
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`: Primary tool (default: gemini)
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. Change Detection → 2. Plan Presentation → 3. Batched Execution → 4. Verification
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Detect Changes First**: Use git diff to identify affected modules
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Execution Strategy**:
+   - **<15 modules**: Direct parallel execution (max 4 concurrent per depth, no agent overhead)
+   - **≥15 modules**: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent, 73% overhead reduction)
+4. **Tool Fallback**: Auto-retry with fallback tools on failure
+5. **Depth Sequential**: Process depths N→0, parallel batches within depth (both modes)
+6. **Related Mode**: Generate/update only changed modules and their parent contexts
+7. **Single Strategy**: Always use `single` strategy (incremental update)
+
+## Tool Fallback Hierarchy
+
+```javascript
+--tool gemini  →  [gemini, qwen, codex]  // default
+--tool qwen    →  [qwen, gemini, codex]
+--tool codex   →  [codex, gemini, qwen]
+```
+
+**Trigger**: Non-zero exit code from generation script
+
+| Tool   | Best For                       | Fallback To    |
+|--------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| gemini | Documentation, patterns        | qwen → codex   |
+| qwen   | Architecture, system design    | gemini → codex |
+| codex  | Implementation, code quality   | gemini → qwen  |
+
+## Phase 1: Change Detection & Analysis
+
+```javascript
+// Get project metadata
+Bash({command: "pwd && basename \"$(pwd)\" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd", run_in_background: false});
+
+// Detect changed modules
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec detect_changed_modules '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
+
+// Cache git changes
+Bash({command: "git add -A 2>/dev/null || true", run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|change:<TYPE>|type:<code|navigation>` to extract affected modules.
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/vendor based on project tech stack (Node.js/Python/Go/Rust/etc).
+
+**Fallback**: If no changes detected, use recent modules (first 10 by depth).
+
+## Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**Present filtered plan**:
+```
+Related Documentation Generation Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Changed: 4 modules | Batching: 4 modules/agent
+  Project: myproject
+  Output: .workflow/docs/myproject/
+
+  Will generate/update docs for:
+  - ./src/api/auth (5 files, type: code) [new module]
+  - ./src/api (12 files, type: code) [parent of changed auth/]
+  - ./src (8 files, type: code) [parent context]
+  - . (14 files, type: code) [root level]
+
+  Documentation Strategy:
+  - Strategy: single (all modules - incremental update)
+  - Output: API.md + README.md (code folders), README.md only (navigation folders)
+  - Context: Current dir code + child docs
+
+  Auto-skipped (12 paths):
+  - Tests: ./src/api/auth.test.ts (8 paths)
+  - Config: tsconfig.json (3 paths)
+  - Other: node_modules (1 path)
+
+  Agent allocation:
+  - Depth 3 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 2 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 1 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 0 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+
+  Estimated time: ~5-10 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**Decision logic**:
+- User confirms "y": Proceed with execution
+- User declines "n": Abort, no changes
+- <15 modules: Direct execution
+- ≥15 modules: Agent batch execution
+
+## Phase 3A: Direct Execution (<15 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Parallel execution within depth (max 4 concurrent), no agent overhead.
+
+**CRITICAL**: All Bash commands use `run_in_background: false` for synchronous execution.
+
+```javascript
+let project_name = detect_project_name();
+
+for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_depth[depth], 4);
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    let parallel_tasks = batch.map(module => {
+      return async () => {
+        for (let tool of tool_order) {
+          Bash({
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+            run_in_background: false
+          });
+          if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+            report(`✅ ${module.path} docs generated with ${tool}`);
+            return true;
+          }
+        }
+        report(`❌ FAILED: ${module.path} failed all tools`);
+        return false;
+      };
+    });
+    await Promise.all(parallel_tasks.map(task => task()));
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Phase 3B: Agent Batch Execution (≥15 modules)
+
+### Batching Strategy
+
+```javascript
+// Batch modules into groups of 4
+function batch_modules(modules, batch_size = 4) {
+  let batches = [];
+  for (let i = 0; i < modules.length; i += batch_size) {
+    batches.push(modules.slice(i, i + batch_size));
+  }
+  return batches;
+}
+// Examples: 10→[4,4,2] | 8→[4,4] | 3→[3]
+```
+
+### Coordinator Orchestration
+
+```javascript
+let modules_by_depth = group_by_depth(changed_modules);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+let project_name = detect_project_name();
+
+for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_depth[depth], 4);
+  let worker_tasks = [];
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    worker_tasks.push(
+      Task(
+        subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+        description=`Generate docs for ${batch.length} modules at depth ${depth}`,
+        prompt=generate_batch_worker_prompt(batch, tool_order, depth, project_name, "related")
+      )
+    );
+  }
+
+  await parallel_execute(worker_tasks);  // Batches run in parallel
+}
+```
+
+### Batch Worker Prompt Template
+
+```
+PURPOSE: Generate/update documentation for assigned modules with tool fallback (related mode)
+
+TASK:
+Generate documentation for the following modules based on recent changes. For each module, try tools in order until success.
+
+PROJECT: {{project_name}}
+OUTPUT: .workflow/docs/{{project_name}}/
+
+MODULES:
+{{module_path_1}} (type: {{folder_type_1}})
+{{module_path_2}} (type: {{folder_type_2}})
+{{module_path_3}} (type: {{folder_type_3}})
+{{module_path_4}} (type: {{folder_type_4}})
+
+TOOLS (try in order):
+1. {{tool_1}}
+2. {{tool_2}}
+3. {{tool_3}}
+
+EXECUTION:
+For each module above:
+  1. Try tool 1:
+     Bash({
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"{{tool_1}}"}'`,
+       run_in_background: false
+     })
+     → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with {{tool_1}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Try tool 2
+  2. Try tool 2:
+     Bash({
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"{{tool_2}}"}'`,
+       run_in_background: false
+     })
+     → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with {{tool_2}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Try tool 3
+  3. Try tool 3:
+     Bash({
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"{{tool_3}}"}'`,
+       run_in_background: false
+     })
+     → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with {{tool_3}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Report "❌ FAILED: {{module_path}} failed all tools", proceed to next module
+
+FOLDER TYPE HANDLING:
+  - code: Generate API.md + README.md
+  - navigation: Generate README.md only
+
+REPORTING:
+Report final summary with:
+- Total processed: X modules
+- Successful: Y modules
+- Failed: Z modules
+- Tool usage: {{tool_1}}:X, {{tool_2}}:Y, {{tool_3}}:Z
+```
+
+## Phase 4: Verification
+
+```javascript
+// Check documentation files created/updated
+Bash({command: 'find .workflow/docs -type f -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l', run_in_background: false});
+
+// Display recent changes
+Bash({command: 'find .workflow/docs -type f -name "*.md" -mmin -60 2>/dev/null', run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Aggregate results**:
+```
+Documentation Generation Summary:
+  Total: 4 | Success: 4 | Failed: 0
+
+  Tool usage:
+  - gemini: 4 modules
+  - qwen: 0 modules (fallback)
+  - codex: 0 modules
+
+  Changes:
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/src/api/auth/API.md      (new)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/src/api/auth/README.md   (new)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/src/api/API.md           (updated)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/src/api/README.md        (updated)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/src/API.md               (updated)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/src/README.md            (updated)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/API.md                   (updated)
+  .workflow/docs/myproject/README.md                (updated)
+```
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+**Module Count Threshold**:
+- **<15 modules**: Coordinator executes Phase 3A (Direct Execution)
+- **≥15 modules**: Coordinator executes Phase 3B (Agent Batch Execution)
+
+**Agent Hierarchy** (for ≥15 modules):
+- **Coordinator**: Handles batch division, spawns worker agents per depth
+- **Worker Agents**: Each processes 4 modules with tool fallback (related mode)
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Batch Worker**:
+- Tool fallback per module (auto-retry)
+- Batch isolation (failures don't propagate)
+- Clear per-module status reporting
+
+**Coordinator**:
+- No changes: Use fallback (recent 10 modules)
+- User decline: No execution
+- Verification fail: Report incomplete modules
+- Partial failures: Continue execution, report failed modules
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+- Non-zero exit code
+- Script timeout
+- Unexpected output
+
+## Output Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/docs/{project_name}/
+├── src/                           # Mirrors source structure
+│   ├── modules/
+│   │   ├── README.md
+│   │   ├── auth/
+│   │   │   ├── API.md             # Updated based on code changes
+│   │   │   └── README.md          # Updated based on code changes
+│   │   └── api/
+│   │       ├── API.md
+│   │       └── README.md
+│   └── utils/
+│       └── README.md
+└── README.md
+```
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Daily development documentation update
+/memory:docs-related-cli
+
+# After feature work with specific tool
+/memory:docs-related-cli --tool qwen
+
+# Code quality documentation review after implementation
+/memory:docs-related-cli --tool codex
+```
+
+## Key Advantages
+
+**Efficiency**: 30 modules → 8 agents (73% reduction)
+**Resilience**: 3-tier fallback per module
+**Performance**: Parallel batches, no concurrency limits
+**Context-aware**: Updates based on actual git changes
+**Fast**: Only affected modules, not entire project
+**Incremental**: Single strategy for focused updates
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+- Parse `--tool` (default: gemini)
+- Get project metadata (name, root)
+- Detect changed modules via detect_changed_modules.sh
+- **Smart filter modules** (auto-detect tech stack, skip tests/build/config/vendor)
+- Cache git changes
+- Apply fallback if no changes (recent 10 modules)
+- Construct tool fallback order
+- **Present filtered plan** with skip reasons and change types
+- **Wait for y/n confirmation**
+- Determine execution mode:
+  - **<15 modules**: Direct execution (Phase 3A)
+    - For each depth (N→0): Sequential module updates with tool fallback
+  - **≥15 modules**: Agent batch execution (Phase 3B)
+    - For each depth (N→0): Batch modules (4 per batch), spawn batch workers in parallel
+- Wait for depth/batch completion
+- Aggregate results
+- Verification check (documentation files created/updated)
+- Display summary + recent changes
+
+## Comparison with Full Documentation Generation
+
+| Aspect | Related Generation | Full Generation |
+|--------|-------------------|-----------------|
+| **Scope** | Changed modules only | All project modules |
+| **Speed** | Fast (minutes) | Slower (10-30 min) |
+| **Use case** | Daily development | Initial setup, major refactoring |
+| **Strategy** | `single` (all) | `full` (L3) + `single` (L1-2) |
+| **Trigger** | After commits | After setup or major changes |
+| **Batching** | 4 modules/agent | 4 modules/agent |
+| **Fallback** | gemini→qwen→codex | gemini→qwen→codex |
+| **Complexity threshold** | ≤15 modules | ≤20 modules |
+
+## Template Reference
+
+Templates used from `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/`:
+- `api.txt`: Code API documentation
+- `module-readme.txt`: Module purpose, usage, dependencies
+- `folder-navigation.txt`: Navigation README for folders
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/memory:docs-full-cli` - Full project documentation generation
+- `/memory:docs` - Agent-based documentation planning workflow
+- `/memory:update-related` - Update CLAUDE.md for changed modules

.claude/commands/memory/docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,615 @@
+---
+name: docs
+description: Plan documentation workflow with dynamic grouping (≤10 docs/task), generates IMPL tasks for parallel module trees, README, ARCHITECTURE, and HTTP API docs
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]"
+---
+
+# Documentation Workflow (/memory:docs)
+
+## Overview
+Lightweight planner that analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation work into tasks, and generates execution plans. Does NOT generate documentation content itself - delegates to doc-generator agent.
+
+**Execution Strategy**:
+- **Dynamic Task Grouping**: Level 1 tasks grouped by top-level directories with document count limit
+  - **Primary constraint**: Each task generates ≤10 documents (API.md + README.md count)
+  - **Optimization goal**: Prefer grouping 2 top-level directories per task for context sharing
+  - **Conflict resolution**: If 2 dirs exceed 10 docs, reduce to 1 dir/task; if 1 dir exceeds 10 docs, split by subdirectories
+  - **Context benefit**: Same-task directories analyzed together via single Gemini call
+- **Parallel Execution**: Multiple Level 1 tasks execute concurrently for faster completion
+- **Pre-computed Analysis**: Phase 2 performs unified analysis once, stored in `.process/` for reuse
+- **Efficient Data Loading**: All existing docs loaded once in Phase 2, shared across tasks
+
+**Path Mirroring**: Documentation structure mirrors source code under `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/`
+- Example: `my_app/src/core/` → `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/core/API.md`
+
+**Two Execution Modes**:
+- **Default (Agent Mode)**: CLI analyzes in `pre_analysis` (MODE=analysis), agent writes docs
+- **--cli-execute (CLI Mode)**: CLI generates docs in `implementation_approach` (MODE=write), agent executes CLI commands
+
+## Path Mirroring Strategy
+
+**Principle**: Documentation structure **mirrors** source code structure under project-specific directory.
+
+| Source Path | Project Name | Documentation Path |
+|------------|--------------|-------------------|
+| `my_app/src/core/` | `my_app` | `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/core/API.md` |
+| `my_app/src/modules/auth/` | `my_app` | `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/modules/auth/API.md` |
+| `another_project/lib/utils/` | `another_project` | `.workflow/docs/another_project/lib/utils/API.md` |
+
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:docs [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]
+```
+
+- **path**: Source directory to analyze (default: current directory)
+  - Specifies the source code directory to be documented
+  - Documentation is generated in a separate `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/` directory at the workspace root, **not** within the source `path` itself
+  - The source path's structure is mirrored within the project-specific documentation folder
+  - Example: analyzing `src/modules` produces documentation at `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/src/modules/`
+- **--mode**: Documentation generation mode (default: full)
+  - `full`: Complete documentation (modules + README + ARCHITECTURE + EXAMPLES + HTTP API)
+  - `partial`: Module documentation only (API.md + README.md)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool selection (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation, pattern recognition
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design focus
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
+- **--cli-execute**: Enable CLI-based documentation generation (optional)
+
+## Planning Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Initialize Session
+
+```bash
+# Get target path, project name, and root
+bash(pwd && basename "$(pwd)" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd && date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+```
+
+```javascript
+// Create docs session (type: docs)
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type docs --new \"{project_name}-docs-{timestamp}\"")
+// Parse output to get sessionId
+```
+
+```bash
+# Update workflow-session.json with docs-specific fields
+bash(jq '. + {"target_path":"{target_path}","project_root":"{project_root}","project_name":"{project_name}","mode":"full","tool":"gemini","cli_execute":false}' .workflow/active/{sessionId}/workflow-session.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json .workflow/active/{sessionId}/workflow-session.json)
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analyze Structure
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/vendor based on project tech stack.
+
+**Commands** (collect data with simple bash):
+
+```bash
+# 1. Run folder analysis
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}')
+
+# 2. Get top-level directories (first 2 path levels)
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}' | awk -F'|' '{print $1}' | sed 's|^\./||' | awk -F'/' '{if(NF>=2) print $1"/"$2; else if(NF==1) print $1}' | sort -u)
+
+# 3. Find existing docs (if directory exists)
+bash(if [ -d .workflow/docs/\${project_name} ]; then find .workflow/docs/\${project_name} -type f -name "*.md" ! -path "*/README.md" ! -path "*/ARCHITECTURE.md" ! -path "*/EXAMPLES.md" ! -path "*/api/*" 2>/dev/null; fi)
+
+# 4. Read existing docs content (if files exist)
+bash(if [ -d .workflow/docs/\${project_name} ]; then find .workflow/docs/\${project_name} -type f -name "*.md" ! -path "*/README.md" ! -path "*/ARCHITECTURE.md" ! -path "*/EXAMPLES.md" ! -path "*/api/*" 2>/dev/null | xargs cat 2>/dev/null; fi)
+```
+
+**Data Processing**: Parse bash outputs, calculate statistics, use **Write tool** to create `${session_dir}/.process/doc-planning-data.json` with structure:
+
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "generated_at": "2025-11-03T16:57:30.469669",
+    "project_name": "project_name",
+    "project_root": "/path/to/project"
+  },
+  "folder_analysis": [
+    {"path": "./src/core", "type": "code", "code_count": 5, "dirs_count": 2}
+  ],
+  "top_level_dirs": ["src/modules", "lib/core"],
+  "existing_docs": {
+    "file_list": [".workflow/docs/project/src/core/API.md"],
+    "content": "... existing docs content ..."
+  },
+  "unified_analysis": [],
+  "statistics": {
+    "total": 15,
+    "code": 8,
+    "navigation": 7,
+    "top_level": 3
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Then** use **Edit tool** to update `workflow-session.json` adding analysis field.
+
+**Output**: Single `doc-planning-data.json` with all analysis data (no temp files or Python scripts).
+
+**Auto-skipped**: Tests (`**/test/**`, `**/*.test.*`), Build (`**/node_modules/**`, `**/dist/**`), Config (root-level files), Vendor directories.
+
+### Phase 3: Detect Update Mode
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# Count existing docs from doc-planning-data.json
+bash(cat .workflow/active/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.process/doc-planning-data.json | jq '.existing_docs.file_list | length')
+```
+
+**Data Processing**: Use count result, then use **Edit tool** to update `workflow-session.json`:
+- Add `"update_mode": "update"` if count > 0, else `"create"`
+- Add `"existing_docs": <count>`
+
+### Phase 4: Decompose Tasks
+
+**Task Hierarchy** (Dynamic based on document count):
+
+```
+Small Projects (total ≤10 docs):
+  Level 1: IMPL-001 (all directories in single task, shared context)
+  Level 2: IMPL-002 (README, full mode only)
+  Level 3: IMPL-003 (ARCHITECTURE+EXAMPLES), IMPL-004 (HTTP API, optional)
+
+Medium Projects (Example: 7 top-level dirs, 18 total docs):
+  Step 1: Count docs per top-level dir
+    ├─ dir1: 3 docs, dir2: 4 docs → Group 1 (7 docs)
+    ├─ dir3: 5 docs, dir4: 3 docs → Group 2 (8 docs)
+    ├─ dir5: 2 docs → Group 3 (2 docs, can add more)
+
+  Step 2: Create tasks with ≤10 docs constraint
+  Level 1: IMPL-001 to IMPL-003 (parallel groups)
+    ├─ IMPL-001: Group 1 (dir1 + dir2, 7 docs, shared context)
+    ├─ IMPL-002: Group 2 (dir3 + dir4, 8 docs, shared context)
+    └─ IMPL-003: Group 3 (remaining dirs, ≤10 docs)
+  Level 2: IMPL-004 (README, depends on Level 1, full mode only)
+  Level 3: IMPL-005 (ARCHITECTURE+EXAMPLES), IMPL-006 (HTTP API, optional)
+
+Large Projects (single dir >10 docs):
+  Step 1: Detect oversized directory
+    └─ src/modules/: 15 subdirs → 30 docs (exceeds limit)
+
+  Step 2: Split by subdirectories
+  Level 1: IMPL-001 to IMPL-003 (split oversized dir)
+    ├─ IMPL-001: src/modules/ subdirs 1-5 (10 docs)
+    ├─ IMPL-002: src/modules/ subdirs 6-10 (10 docs)
+    └─ IMPL-003: src/modules/ subdirs 11-15 (10 docs)
+```
+
+**Grouping Algorithm**:
+1. Count total docs for each top-level directory
+2. Try grouping 2 directories (optimization for context sharing)
+3. If group exceeds 10 docs, split to 1 dir/task
+4. If single dir exceeds 10 docs, split by subdirectories
+5. Create parallel Level 1 tasks with ≤10 docs each
+
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Get top-level directories from doc-planning-data.json
+bash(cat .workflow/active/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.process/doc-planning-data.json | jq -r '.top_level_dirs[]')
+
+# 2. Get mode from workflow-session.json
+bash(cat .workflow/active/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/workflow-session.json | jq -r '.mode // "full"')
+
+# 3. Check for HTTP API
+bash(grep -r "router\.|@Get\|@Post" src/ 2>/dev/null && echo "API_FOUND" || echo "NO_API")
+```
+
+**Data Processing**:
+1. Count documents for each top-level directory (from folder_analysis):
+   - Code folders: 2 docs each (API.md + README.md)
+   - Navigation folders: 1 doc each (README.md only)
+2. Apply grouping algorithm with ≤10 docs constraint:
+   - Try grouping 2 directories, calculate total docs
+   - If total ≤10 docs: create group
+   - If total >10 docs: split to 1 dir/group or subdivide
+   - If single dir >10 docs: split by subdirectories
+3. Use **Edit tool** to update `doc-planning-data.json` adding groups field:
+   ```json
+   "groups": {
+     "count": 3,
+     "assignments": [
+       {"group_id": "001", "directories": ["src/modules", "src/utils"], "doc_count": 5},
+       {"group_id": "002", "directories": ["lib/core"], "doc_count": 6},
+       {"group_id": "003", "directories": ["lib/helpers"], "doc_count": 3}
+     ]
+   }
+   ```
+
+**Task ID Calculation**:
+```bash
+group_count=$(jq '.groups.count' .workflow/active/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.process/doc-planning-data.json)
+readme_id=$((group_count + 1))   # Next ID after groups
+arch_id=$((group_count + 2))
+api_id=$((group_count + 3))
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Task JSONs
+
+**CLI Strategy**:
+
+| Mode | cli_execute | Placement | CLI MODE | Approval Flag | Agent Role |
+|------|-------------|-----------|----------|---------------|------------|
+| **Agent** | false | pre_analysis | analysis | (none) | Generate docs in implementation_approach |
+| **CLI** | true | implementation_approach | write | --mode write | Execute CLI commands, validate output |
+
+**Command Patterns**:
+- Gemini/Qwen: `ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd dir`
+- CLI Mode: `ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode write --cd dir`
+- Codex: `ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd dir`
+
+**Generation Process**:
+1. Read configuration values (tool, cli_execute, mode) from workflow-session.json
+2. Read group assignments from doc-planning-data.json
+3. Generate Level 1 tasks (IMPL-001 to IMPL-N, one per group)
+4. Generate Level 2+ tasks if mode=full (README, ARCHITECTURE, HTTP API)
+
+## Task Templates
+
+### Level 1: Module Trees Group Task (Unified)
+
+**Execution Model**: Each task processes assigned directory group (max 2 directories) using pre-analyzed data from Phase 2.
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${group_number}",
+  "title": "Document Module Trees Group ${group_number}",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "docs-tree-group",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "cli_execute": false,
+    "group_number": "${group_number}",
+    "total_groups": "${total_groups}"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Process directories from group ${group_number} in doc-planning-data.json",
+      "Generate docs to .workflow/docs/${project_name}/ (mirrored structure)",
+      "Code folders: API.md + README.md; Navigation folders: README.md only",
+      "Use pre-analyzed data from Phase 2 (no redundant analysis)"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["${group_dirs_from_json}"],
+    "precomputed_data": {
+      "phase2_analysis": "${session_dir}/.process/doc-planning-data.json"
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_precomputed_data",
+        "action": "Load Phase 2 analysis and extract group directories",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/doc-planning-data.json)",
+          "bash(jq '.groups.assignments[] | select(.group_id == \"${group_number}\") | .directories' ${session_dir}/.process/doc-planning-data.json)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "phase2_context",
+        "note": "Single JSON file contains all Phase 2 analysis results"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate documentation for assigned directory group",
+        "description": "Process directories in Group ${group_number} using pre-analyzed data",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Read group directories from [phase2_context].groups.assignments[${group_number}].directories",
+          "For each directory: parse folder types from folder_analysis, parse structure from unified_analysis",
+          "Map source_path to .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{path}",
+          "Generate API.md for code folders, README.md for all folders",
+          "Preserve user modifications from [phase2_context].existing_docs.content"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": [
+          "phase2 = parse([phase2_context])",
+          "dirs = phase2.groups.assignments[${group_number}].directories",
+          "for dir in dirs:",
+          "  folder_info = find(dir, phase2.folder_analysis)",
+          "  outline = find(dir, phase2.unified_analysis)",
+          "  if folder_info.type == 'code': generate API.md + README.md",
+          "  elif folder_info.type == 'navigation': generate README.md only",
+          "  write to .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{dir}/"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "group_module_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/*/API.md",
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/*/README.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**CLI Execute Mode Note**: When `cli_execute=true`, add Step 2 in `implementation_approach`:
+```json
+{
+  "step": 2,
+  "title": "Batch generate documentation via CLI",
+  "command": "ccw cli -p 'PURPOSE: Generate module docs\\nTASK: Create documentation\\nMODE: write\\nCONTEXT: @**/* [phase2_context]\\nEXPECTED: API.md and README.md\\nRULES: Mirror structure' --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${dirs_from_group}",
+  "depends_on": [1],
+  "output": "generated_docs"
+}
+```
+
+### Level 2: Project README Task
+
+**Task ID**: `IMPL-${readme_id}` (where `readme_id = group_count + 1`)
+**Dependencies**: Depends on all Level 1 tasks completing.
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${readme_id}",
+  "title": "Generate Project README",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "...", "IMPL-${group_count}"],
+  "meta": {"type": "docs", "agent": "@doc-generator", "tool": "gemini", "cli_execute": false},
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_existing_readme",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing README')",
+        "output_to": "existing_readme"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "load_module_docs",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/${project_name} -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '.workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/*' | xargs cat)",
+        "output_to": "all_module_docs"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_project",
+        "command": "bash(ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project structure\\nTASK: Extract overview from modules\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Project outline\" --tool gemini --mode analysis)",
+        "output_to": "project_outline"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate project README",
+        "description": "Generate project README with navigation links while preserving user modifications",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [project_outline] and [all_module_docs]",
+          "Generate README structure with navigation links",
+          "Preserve [existing_readme] user modifications"
+        ],
+        "logic_flow": ["Parse data", "Generate README with navigation", "Preserve modifications"],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "project_readme"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 3: Architecture & Examples Documentation Task
+
+**Task ID**: `IMPL-${arch_id}` (where `arch_id = group_count + 2`)
+**Dependencies**: Depends on Level 2 (Project README).
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${arch_id}",
+  "title": "Generate Architecture & Examples Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-${readme_id}"],
+  "meta": {"type": "docs", "agent": "@doc-generator", "tool": "gemini", "cli_execute": false},
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {"step": "load_existing_docs", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{ARCHITECTURE,EXAMPLES}.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing docs')", "output_to": "existing_arch_examples"},
+      {"step": "load_all_docs", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md && find .workflow/docs/${project_name} -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '*/README.md' ! -path '*/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '*/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '*/api/*' | xargs cat)", "output_to": "all_docs"},
+      {"step": "analyze_architecture", "command": "bash(ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze system architecture\\nTASK: Synthesize architectural overview and examples\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture + Examples outline\" --tool gemini --mode analysis)", "output_to": "arch_examples_outline"}
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate architecture and examples documentation",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [arch_examples_outline] and [all_docs]",
+          "Generate ARCHITECTURE.md (system design, patterns)",
+          "Generate EXAMPLES.md (code snippets, usage)",
+          "Preserve [existing_arch_examples] modifications"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "arch_examples_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/${project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md", ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/EXAMPLES.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 4: HTTP API Documentation Task (Optional)
+
+**Task ID**: `IMPL-${api_id}` (where `api_id = group_count + 3`)
+**Dependencies**: Depends on Level 3.
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${api_id}",
+  "title": "Generate HTTP API Documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-${arch_id}"],
+  "meta": {"type": "docs", "agent": "@doc-generator", "tool": "gemini", "cli_execute": false},
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {"step": "discover_api", "command": "bash(rg 'router\\.| @(Get|Post)' -g '*.{ts,js}')", "output_to": "endpoint_discovery"},
+      {"step": "load_existing_api", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing API docs')", "output_to": "existing_api_docs"},
+      {"step": "analyze_api", "command": "bash(ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Document HTTP API\\nTASK: Analyze endpoints\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @src/api/**/* [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: API outline\" --tool gemini --mode analysis)", "output_to": "api_outline"}
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate HTTP API documentation",
+        "modification_points": [
+          "Parse [api_outline] and [endpoint_discovery]",
+          "Document endpoints, request/response formats",
+          "Preserve [existing_api_docs] modifications"
+        ],
+        "depends_on": [],
+        "output": "api_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/README.md"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Session Structure
+
+**Unified Structure** (single JSON replaces multiple text files):
+
+```
+.workflow/active/
+└── WFS-docs-{timestamp}/
+    ├── workflow-session.json            # Session metadata
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md
+    ├── .process/
+    │   └── doc-planning-data.json       # All Phase 2 analysis data (replaces 7+ files)
+    └── .task/
+        ├── IMPL-001.json                # Small: all modules | Large: group 1
+        ├── IMPL-00N.json                # (Large only: groups 2-N)
+        ├── IMPL-{N+1}.json              # README (full mode)
+        ├── IMPL-{N+2}.json              # ARCHITECTURE+EXAMPLES (full mode)
+        └── IMPL-{N+3}.json              # HTTP API (optional)
+```
+
+**doc-planning-data.json Structure**:
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "generated_at": "2025-11-03T16:41:06+08:00",
+    "project_name": "Claude_dms3",
+    "project_root": "/d/Claude_dms3"
+  },
+  "folder_analysis": [
+    {"path": "./src/core", "type": "code", "code_count": 5, "dirs_count": 2},
+    {"path": "./src/utils", "type": "navigation", "code_count": 0, "dirs_count": 4}
+  ],
+  "top_level_dirs": ["src/modules", "src/utils", "lib/core"],
+  "existing_docs": {
+    "file_list": [".workflow/docs/project/src/core/API.md"],
+    "content": "... concatenated existing docs ..."
+  },
+  "unified_analysis": [
+    {"module_path": "./src/core", "outline_summary": "Core functionality"}
+  ],
+  "groups": {
+    "count": 4,
+    "assignments": [
+      {"group_id": "001", "directories": ["src/modules", "src/utils"], "doc_count": 6},
+      {"group_id": "002", "directories": ["lib/core", "lib/helpers"], "doc_count": 7}
+    ]
+  },
+  "statistics": {
+    "total": 15,
+    "code": 8,
+    "navigation": 7,
+    "top_level": 3
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Workflow Session Structure** (workflow-session.json):
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-docs-{timestamp}",
+  "project": "{project_name} documentation",
+  "status": "planning",
+  "timestamp": "2024-01-20T14:30:22+08:00",
+  "path": ".",
+  "target_path": "/path/to/project",
+  "project_root": "/path/to/project",
+  "project_name": "{project_name}",
+  "mode": "full",
+  "tool": "gemini",
+  "cli_execute": false,
+  "update_mode": "update",
+  "existing_docs": 5,
+  "analysis": {
+    "total": "15",
+    "code": "8",
+    "navigation": "7",
+    "top_level": "3"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Generated Documentation
+
+**Structure mirrors project source directories under project-specific folder**:
+
+```
+.workflow/docs/
+└── {project_name}/                    # Project-specific root
+    ├── src/                           # Mirrors src/ directory
+    │   ├── modules/
+    │   │   ├── README.md              # Navigation
+    │   │   ├── auth/
+    │   │   │   ├── API.md             # API signatures
+    │   │   │   ├── README.md          # Module docs
+    │   │   │   └── middleware/
+    │   │   │       ├── API.md
+    │   │   │       └── README.md
+    │   │   └── api/
+    │   │       ├── API.md
+    │   │       └── README.md
+    │   └── utils/
+    │       └── README.md
+    ├── lib/                           # Mirrors lib/ directory
+    │   └── core/
+    │       ├── API.md
+    │       └── README.md
+    ├── README.md                      # Project root
+    ├── ARCHITECTURE.md                # System design
+    ├── EXAMPLES.md                    # Usage examples
+    └── api/                           # Optional
+        └── README.md                  # HTTP API reference
+```
+
+## Execution Commands
+
+```bash
+# Execute entire workflow (auto-discovers active session)
+/workflow:execute
+
+# Or specify session
+/workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-docs-yyyymmdd-hhmmss"
+
+# Individual task execution
+/task:execute IMPL-001
+```
+
+## Template Reference
+
+**Available Templates** (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/`):
+- `api.txt`: Code API (Part A) + HTTP API (Part B)
+- `module-readme.txt`: Module purpose, usage, dependencies
+- `folder-navigation.txt`: Navigation README for folders with subdirectories
+- `project-readme.txt`: Project overview, getting started, navigation
+- `project-architecture.txt`: System structure, module map, design patterns
+- `project-examples.txt`: End-to-end usage examples
+
+## Execution Mode Summary
+
+| Mode | CLI Placement | CLI MODE | Approval Flag | Agent Role |
+|------|---------------|----------|---------------|------------|
+| **Agent (default)** | pre_analysis | analysis | (none) | Generates documentation content |
+| **CLI (--cli-execute)** | implementation_approach | write | --mode write | Executes CLI commands, validates output |
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+- **Phase 2**: Unified analysis once, results in `.process/`
+- **Phase 4**: Dynamic grouping (max 2 dirs per group)
+- **Level 1**: Parallel processing for module tree groups
+- **Level 2+**: Sequential execution for project-level docs
+
+## Related Commands
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute documentation tasks
+- `/workflow:status` - View task progress
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Mark session complete

.claude/commands/memory/load-skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+---
+name: load-skill-memory
+description: Activate SKILL package (auto-detect from paths/keywords or manual) and intelligently load documentation based on task intent keywords
+argument-hint: "[skill_name] \"task intent description\""
+allowed-tools: Bash(*), Read(*), Skill(*)
+---
+
+# Memory Load SKILL Command (/memory:load-skill-memory)
+
+## 1. Overview
+
+The `memory:load-skill-memory` command **activates SKILL package** (auto-detect from task or manual specification) and intelligently loads documentation based on user's task intent. The system automatically determines which documentation files to read based on the intent description.
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Flexible Activation**: Auto-detect skill from task description/paths, or user explicitly specifies
+- **Intent-Driven Loading**: System analyzes task intent to determine documentation scope
+- **Intelligent Selection**: Automatically chooses appropriate documentation level and modules
+- **Direct Context Loading**: Loads selected documentation into conversation memory
+
+**When to Use**:
+- Manually activate a known SKILL package for a specific task
+- Load SKILL context when system hasn't auto-triggered it
+- Force reload SKILL documentation with specific intent focus
+
+**Note**: Normal SKILL activation happens automatically via description triggers or path mentions (system extracts skill name from file paths for intelligent triggering). Use this command only when manual activation is needed.
+
+## 2. Parameters
+
+- `[skill_name]` (Optional): Name of SKILL package to activate
+  - If omitted: System auto-detects from task description or file paths
+  - If specified: Direct activation of named SKILL package
+  - Example: `my_project`, `api_service`
+  - Must match directory name under `.claude/skills/`
+
+- `"task intent description"` (Required): Description of what you want to do
+  - Used for both: auto-detection (if skill_name omitted) and documentation scope selection
+  - **Analysis tasks**: "分析builder pattern实现", "理解参数系统架构"
+  - **Modification tasks**: "修改workflow逻辑", "增强thermal template功能"
+  - **Learning tasks**: "学习接口设计模式", "了解测试框架使用"
+  - **With paths**: "修改D:\projects\my_project\src\auth.py的认证逻辑" (auto-extracts `my_project`)
+
+## 3. Execution Flow
+
+### Step 1: Determine SKILL Name (if not provided)
+
+**Auto-Detection Strategy** (when skill_name parameter is omitted):
+1. **Path Extraction**: Scan task description for file paths
+   - Extract potential project names from path segments
+   - Example: `"修改D:\projects\my_project\src\auth.py"` → extracts `my_project`
+2. **Keyword Matching**: Match task keywords against SKILL descriptions
+   - Search for project-specific terms, domain keywords
+3. **Validation**: Check if extracted name matches `.claude/skills/{skill_name}/`
+
+**Result**: Either uses provided skill_name or auto-detected name for activation
+
+### Step 2: Activate SKILL and Analyze Intent
+
+**Activate SKILL Package**:
+```javascript
+Skill(command: "${skill_name}")  // Uses provided or auto-detected name
+```
+
+**What Happens After Activation**:
+1. If SKILL exists in memory: System reads `.claude/skills/${skill_name}/SKILL.md`
+2. If SKILL not found in memory: Error - SKILL package doesn't exist
+3. SKILL description triggers are loaded into memory
+4. Progressive loading mechanism becomes available
+5. Documentation structure is now accessible
+
+**Intent Analysis**:
+Based on task intent description, system determines:
+- **Action type**: analyzing, modifying, learning
+- **Scope**: specific module, architecture overview, complete system
+- **Depth**: quick reference, detailed API, full documentation
+
+### Step 3: Intelligent Documentation Loading
+
+**Loading Strategy**:
+
+The system automatically selects documentation based on intent keywords:
+
+1. **Quick Understanding** ("了解", "快速理解", "什么是"):
+   - Load: Level 0 (README.md only, ~2K tokens)
+   - Use case: Quick overview of capabilities
+
+2. **Specific Module Analysis** ("分析XXX模块", "理解XXX实现"):
+   - Load: Module-specific README.md + API.md (~5K tokens)
+   - Use case: Deep dive into specific component
+
+3. **Architecture Review** ("架构", "设计模式", "整体结构"):
+   - Load: README.md + ARCHITECTURE.md (~10K tokens)
+   - Use case: System design understanding
+
+4. **Implementation/Modification** ("修改", "增强", "实现"):
+   - Load: Relevant module docs + EXAMPLES.md (~15K tokens)
+   - Use case: Code modification with examples
+
+5. **Comprehensive Learning** ("学习", "完整了解", "深入理解"):
+   - Load: Level 3 (All documentation, ~40K tokens)
+   - Use case: Complete system mastery
+
+**Documentation Loaded into Memory**:
+After loading, the selected documentation content is available in conversation memory for subsequent operations.
+
+## 4. Usage Examples
+
+### Example 1: Manual Specification
+
+**User Command**:
+```bash
+/memory:load-skill-memory my_project "修改认证模块增加OAuth支持"
+```
+
+**Execution**:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Use provided skill_name
+skill_name = "my_project"  // Directly from parameter
+
+// Step 2: Activate SKILL
+Skill(command: "my_project")
+
+// Step 3: Intent Analysis
+Keywords: ["修改", "认证模块", "增加", "OAuth"]
+Action: modifying (implementation)
+Scope: auth module + examples
+
+// Load documentation based on intent
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/auth/README.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/auth/API.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/EXAMPLES.md)
+```
+
+### Example 2: Auto-Detection from Path
+
+**User Command**:
+```bash
+/memory:load-skill-memory "修改D:\projects\my_project\src\services\api.py的接口逻辑"
+```
+
+**Execution**:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Auto-detect skill_name from path
+Path detected: "D:\projects\my_project\src\services\api.py"
+Extracted: "my_project"
+Validated: .claude/skills/my_project/ exists ✓
+skill_name = "my_project"
+
+// Step 2: Activate SKILL
+Skill(command: "my_project")
+
+// Step 3: Intent Analysis
+Keywords: ["修改", "services", "接口逻辑"]
+Action: modifying (implementation)
+Scope: services module + examples
+
+// Load documentation based on intent
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/services/README.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/services/API.md)
+Read(.workflow/docs/my_project/EXAMPLES.md)
+```
+
+## 5. Intent Keyword Mapping
+
+**Quick Reference**:
+- **Triggers**: "了解", "快速", "什么是", "简介"
+- **Loads**: README.md only (~2K)
+
+**Module-Specific**:
+- **Triggers**: "XXX模块", "XXX组件", "分析XXX"
+- **Loads**: Module README + API (~5K)
+
+**Architecture**:
+- **Triggers**: "架构", "设计", "整体结构", "系统设计"
+- **Loads**: README + ARCHITECTURE (~10K)
+
+**Implementation**:
+- **Triggers**: "修改", "增强", "实现", "开发", "集成"
+- **Loads**: Relevant module + EXAMPLES (~15K)
+
+**Comprehensive**:
+- **Triggers**: "完整", "深入", "全面", "学习整个"
+- **Loads**: All documentation (~40K)

.claude/commands/memory/load.md

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+---
+name: load
+description: Delegate to universal-executor agent to analyze project via Gemini/Qwen CLI and return JSON core content package for task context
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen] \"task context description\""
+allowed-tools: Task(*), Bash(*)
+examples:
+  - /memory:load "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
+  - /memory:load --tool qwen "重构支付模块API"
+---
+
+# Memory Load Command (/memory:load)
+
+## 1. Overview
+
+The `memory:load` command **delegates to a universal-executor agent** to analyze the project and return a structured "Core Content Pack". This pack is loaded into the main thread's memory, providing essential context for subsequent agent operations while minimizing token consumption.
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Agent-Driven**: Fully delegates execution to universal-executor agent
+- **Read-Only Analysis**: Does not modify code, only extracts context
+- **Structured Output**: Returns standardized JSON content package
+- **Memory Optimization**: Package loaded directly into main thread memory
+- **Token Efficiency**: CLI analysis executed within agent to save tokens
+
+## 2. Parameters
+
+- `"task context description"` (Required): Task description to guide context extraction
+  - Example: "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
+  - Example: "重构支付模块API"
+  - Example: "修复数据库查询性能问题"
+
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen>` (Optional): Specify CLI tool for agent to use (default: gemini)
+  - gemini: Large context window, suitable for complex project analysis
+  - qwen: Alternative to Gemini with similar capabilities
+
+## 3. Agent-Driven Execution Flow
+
+The command fully delegates to **universal-executor agent**, which autonomously:
+
+1. **Analyzes Project Structure**: Executes `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to understand architecture
+2. **Loads Documentation**: Reads CLAUDE.md, README.md and other key docs
+3. **Extracts Keywords**: Derives core keywords from task description
+4. **Discovers Files**: Uses CodexLens MCP or rg/find to locate relevant files
+5. **CLI Deep Analysis**: Executes Gemini/Qwen CLI for deep context analysis
+6. **Generates Content Package**: Returns structured JSON core content package
+
+## 4. Core Content Package Structure
+
+**Output Format** - Loaded into main thread memory for subsequent use:
+
+```json
+{
+  "task_context": "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能",
+  "keywords": ["前端", "用户", "认证", "auth", "login"],
+  "project_summary": {
+    "architecture": "TypeScript + React frontend with Vite build system",
+    "tech_stack": ["React", "TypeScript", "Vite", "TailwindCSS"],
+    "key_patterns": [
+      "State management via Context API",
+      "Functional components with Hooks pattern",
+      "API calls encapsulated in custom hooks"
+    ]
+  },
+  "relevant_files": [
+    {
+      "path": "src/components/Auth/LoginForm.tsx",
+      "relevance": "Existing login form component",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "src/contexts/AuthContext.tsx",
+      "relevance": "Authentication state management context",
+      "priority": "high"
+    },
+    {
+      "path": "CLAUDE.md",
+      "relevance": "Project development standards",
+      "priority": "high"
+    }
+  ],
+  "integration_points": [
+    "Must integrate with existing AuthContext",
+    "Follow component organization pattern: src/components/[Feature]/",
+    "API calls should use src/hooks/useApi.ts wrapper"
+  ],
+  "constraints": [
+    "Maintain backward compatibility",
+    "Follow TypeScript strict mode",
+    "Use existing UI component library"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## 5. Agent Invocation
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="universal-executor",
+  description="Load project memory: ${task_description}",
+  prompt=`
+## Mission: Load Project Memory Context
+
+**Task**: Load project memory context for: "${task_description}"
+**Mode**: analysis
+**Tool Preference**: ${tool || 'gemini'}
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### Step 1: Foundation Analysis
+
+1. **Project Structure**
+   \`\`\`bash
+   bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')
+   \`\`\`
+
+2. **Core Documentation**
+   \`\`\`javascript
+   Read(CLAUDE.md)
+   Read(README.md)
+   \`\`\`
+
+### Step 2: Keyword Extraction & File Discovery
+
+1. Extract core keywords from task description
+2. Discover relevant files using ripgrep and find:
+   \`\`\`bash
+   # Find files by name
+   find . -name "*{keyword}*" -type f
+
+   # Search content with ripgrep
+   rg "{keyword}" --type ts --type md -C 2
+   rg -l "{keyword}" --type ts --type md  # List files only
+   \`\`\`
+
+### Step 3: Deep Analysis via CLI
+
+Execute Gemini/Qwen CLI for deep analysis (saves main thread tokens):
+
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Extract project core context for task: ${task_description}
+TASK: Analyze project architecture, tech stack, key patterns, relevant files
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md,README.md @${discovered_files}
+EXPECTED: Structured project summary and integration point analysis
+RULES:
+- Focus on task-relevant core information
+- Identify key architecture patterns and technical constraints
+- Extract integration points and development standards
+- Output concise, structured format
+" --tool ${tool} --mode analysis
+\`\`\`
+
+### Step 4: Generate Core Content Package
+
+Generate structured JSON content package (format shown above)
+
+**Required Fields**:
+- task_context: Original task description
+- keywords: Extracted keyword array
+- project_summary: Architecture, tech stack, key patterns
+- relevant_files: File list with path, relevance, priority
+- integration_points: Integration guidance
+- constraints: Development constraints
+
+### Step 5: Return Content Package
+
+Return JSON content package as final output for main thread to load into memory.
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before returning:
+- [ ] Valid JSON format
+- [ ] All required fields complete
+- [ ] relevant_files contains 3-10 files minimum
+- [ ] project_summary accurately reflects architecture
+- [ ] integration_points clearly specify integration paths
+- [ ] keywords accurately extracted (3-8 keywords)
+- [ ] Content concise, avoiding redundancy (< 5KB total)
+
+  `
+)
+```
+
+## 6. Usage Examples
+
+### Example 1: Load Context for New Feature
+
+```bash
+/memory:load "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
+```
+
+**Agent Execution**:
+1. Analyzes project structure (`get_modules_by_depth.sh`)
+2. Reads CLAUDE.md, README.md
+3. Extracts keywords: ["前端", "用户", "认证", "auth"]
+4. Uses MCP to search relevant files
+5. Executes Gemini CLI for deep analysis
+6. Returns core content package
+
+**Returned Package** (loaded into memory):
+```json
+{
+  "task_context": "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能",
+  "keywords": ["前端", "认证", "auth", "login"],
+  "project_summary": { ... },
+  "relevant_files": [ ... ],
+  "integration_points": [ ... ],
+  "constraints": [ ... ]
+}
+```
+
+### Example 2: Using Qwen Tool
+
+```bash
+/memory:load --tool qwen "重构支付模块API"
+```
+
+Agent uses Qwen CLI for analysis, returns same structured package.
+
+### Example 3: Bug Fix Context
+
+```bash
+/memory:load "修复登录验证错误"
+```
+
+Returns core context related to login validation, including test files and validation logic.
+
+### Memory Persistence
+
+- **Session-Scoped**: Content package valid for current session
+- **Subsequent Reference**: All subsequent agents/commands can access
+- **Reload Required**: New sessions need to re-execute /memory:load
+
+## 8. Notes
+
+- **Read-Only**: Does not modify any code, pure analysis
+- **Token Optimization**: CLI analysis executed within agent, saves main thread tokens
+- **Memory Loading**: Returned JSON loaded directly into main thread memory
+- **Subsequent Use**: Other commands/agents can reference this package for development
+- **Session-Level**: Content package valid for current session

.claude/commands/memory/skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,525 @@
+---
+name: skill-memory
+description: 4-phase autonomous orchestrator: check docs → /memory:docs planning → /workflow:execute → generate SKILL.md with progressive loading index (skips phases 2-3 if docs exist)
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--regenerate] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Memory SKILL Package Generator
+
+## Orchestrator Role
+
+**Pure Orchestrator**: Execute documentation generation workflow, then generate SKILL.md index. Does NOT create task JSON files.
+
+**Auto-Continue Workflow**: This command runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes and automatically triggers the next phase without user interaction.
+
+**Execution Paths**:
+- **Full Path**: All 4 phases (no existing docs OR `--regenerate` specified)
+- **Skip Path**: Phase 1 → Phase 4 (existing docs found AND no `--regenerate` flag)
+- **Phase 4 Always Executes**: SKILL.md index is never skipped, always generated or updated
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+2. **No Task JSON**: This command does not create task JSON files - delegates to /memory:docs
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command output (session_id, task_count, file paths)
+4. **Auto-Continue**: After completing each phase, update TodoWrite and immediately execute next phase
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after EVERY phase completion before starting next phase
+6. **Direct Generation**: Phase 4 directly generates SKILL.md using Write tool
+7. **No Manual Steps**: User should never be prompted for decisions between phases
+
+---
+
+## 4-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Prepare Arguments
+
+**Goal**: Parse command arguments and check existing documentation
+
+**Step 1: Get Target Path and Project Name**
+```bash
+# Get current directory (or use provided path)
+bash(pwd)
+
+# Get project name from directory
+bash(basename "$(pwd)")
+
+# Get project root
+bash(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `target_path`: `/d/my_project`
+- `project_name`: `my_project`
+- `project_root`: `/d/my_project`
+
+**Step 2: Set Default Parameters**
+```bash
+# Default values (use these unless user specifies otherwise):
+# - tool: "gemini"
+# - mode: "full"
+# - regenerate: false (no --regenerate flag)
+# - cli_execute: false (no --cli-execute flag)
+```
+
+**Step 3: Check Existing Documentation**
+```bash
+# Check if docs directory exists
+bash(test -d .workflow/docs/my_project && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
+
+# Count existing documentation files
+bash(find .workflow/docs/my_project -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `docs_exists`: `exists` or `not_exists`
+- `existing_docs`: `5` (or `0` if no docs)
+
+**Step 4: Determine Execution Path**
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+if (existing_docs > 0 && !regenerate_flag) {
+  // Documentation exists and no regenerate flag
+  SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true
+  message = "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+} else if (regenerate_flag) {
+  // Force regeneration: delete existing docs
+  bash(rm -rf .workflow/docs/my_project 2>/dev/null || true)
+  SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false
+  message = "Regenerating documentation from scratch."
+} else {
+  // No existing docs
+  SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false
+  message = "No existing documentation found, generating new documentation."
+}
+```
+
+**Summary Variables**:
+- `PROJECT_NAME`: `my_project`
+- `TARGET_PATH`: `/d/my_project`
+- `DOCS_PATH`: `.workflow/docs/my_project`
+- `TOOL`: `gemini` (default) or user-specified
+- `MODE`: `full` (default) or user-specified
+- `CLI_EXECUTE`: `false` (default) or `true` if --cli-execute flag
+- `REGENERATE`: `false` (default) or `true` if --regenerate flag
+- `EXISTING_DOCS`: Count of existing documentation files
+- `SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION`: `true` if skipping Phase 2/3, `false` otherwise
+
+**Completion & TodoWrite**:
+- If `SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true`: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2&3 completed (skipped), phase 4 in_progress
+- If `SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false`: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Next Action**:
+- If skipping: Display skip message → Jump to Phase 4 (SKILL.md generation)
+- If not skipping: Display preparation results → Continue to Phase 2 (documentation planning)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Call /memory:docs
+
+**Skip Condition**: This phase is **skipped if SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true** (documentation already exists without --regenerate flag)
+
+**Goal**: Trigger documentation generation workflow
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/memory:docs [targetPath] --tool [tool] --mode [mode] [--cli-execute]")
+```
+
+**Example**:
+```bash
+/memory:docs /d/my_app --tool gemini --mode full
+/memory:docs /d/my_app --tool gemini --mode full --cli-execute
+```
+
+**Note**: The `--regenerate` flag is handled in Phase 1 by deleting existing documentation. This command always calls `/memory:docs` without the regenerate flag, relying on docs.md's built-in update detection.
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract session ID: `WFS-docs-[timestamp]` (store as `docsSessionId`)
+- Extract task count (store as `taskCount`)
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- `/memory:docs` command executed successfully
+- Session ID extracted and stored
+- Task count retrieved
+- Task files created in `.workflow/[docsSessionId]/.task/`
+- workflow-session.json exists
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+**Next Action**: Display docs planning results (session ID, task count) → Auto-continue to Phase 3
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Execute Documentation Generation
+
+**Skip Condition**: This phase is **skipped if SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true** (documentation already exists without --regenerate flag)
+
+**Goal**: Execute documentation generation tasks
+
+**Command**:
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:execute")
+```
+
+**Note**: `/workflow:execute` automatically discovers active session from Phase 2
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- `/workflow:execute` command executed successfully
+- Documentation files generated in `.workflow/docs/[projectName]/`
+- All tasks marked as completed in session
+- At minimum: module documentation files exist (API.md and/or README.md)
+- For full mode: Project README, ARCHITECTURE, EXAMPLES files generated
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+
+**Next Action**: Display execution results (file count, module count) → Auto-continue to Phase 4
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Generate SKILL.md Index
+
+**Note**: This phase is **NEVER skipped** - it always executes to generate or update the SKILL index.
+
+**Step 1: Read Key Files** (Use Read tool)
+- `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/README.md` (required)
+- `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md` (optional)
+
+**Step 2: Discover Structure**
+```bash
+bash(find .workflow/docs/{project_name} -name "*.md" | sed 's|.workflow/docs/{project_name}/||' | awk -F'/' '{if(NF>=2) print $1"/"$2}' | sort -u)
+```
+
+**Step 3: Generate Intelligent Description**
+
+Extract from README + structure: Function (capabilities), Modules (names), Keywords (API/CLI/auth/etc.)
+
+**Format**: `{Project} {core capabilities} (located at {project_path}). Load this SKILL when analyzing, modifying, or learning about {domain_description} or files under this path, especially when no relevant context exists in memory.`
+
+**Key Elements**:
+- **Path Reference**: Use `TARGET_PATH` from Phase 1 for precise location identification
+- **Domain Description**: Extract human-readable domain/feature area from README (e.g., "workflow management", "thermal modeling")
+- **Trigger Optimization**: Include project path, emphasize "especially when no relevant context exists in memory"
+- **Action Coverage**: analyzing (分析), modifying (修改), learning (了解)
+
+**Example**: "Workflow orchestration system with CLI tools and documentation generation (located at /d/Claude_dms3). Load this SKILL when analyzing, modifying, or learning about workflow management or files under this path, especially when no relevant context exists in memory."
+
+**Step 4: Write SKILL.md** (Use Write tool)
+```bash
+bash(mkdir -p .claude/skills/{project_name})
+```
+
+`.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`:
+```yaml
+---
+name: {project_name}
+description: {intelligent description from Step 3}
+version: 1.0.0
+---
+# {Project Name} SKILL Package
+
+## Documentation: `../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/`
+
+## Progressive Loading
+### Level 0: Quick Start (~2K)
+- [README](../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/README.md)
+### Level 1: Core Modules (~8K)
+{Module READMEs}
+### Level 2: Complete (~25K)
+All modules + [Architecture](../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/ARCHITECTURE.md)
+### Level 3: Deep Dive (~40K)
+Everything + [Examples](../../../.workflow/docs/{project_name}/EXAMPLES.md)
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- SKILL.md file created at `.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`
+- Intelligent description generated from documentation
+- Progressive loading levels (0-3) properly structured
+- Module index includes all documented modules
+- All file references use relative paths
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+
+**Final Action**: Report completion summary to user
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+SKILL Package Generation Complete
+
+Project: {project_name}
+Documentation: .workflow/docs/{project_name}/ ({doc_count} files)
+SKILL Index: .claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md
+
+Generated:
+- {task_count} documentation tasks completed
+- SKILL.md with progressive loading (4 levels)
+- Module index with {module_count} modules
+
+Usage:
+- Load Level 0: Quick project overview (~2K tokens)
+- Load Level 1: Core modules (~8K tokens)
+- Load Level 2: Complete docs (~25K tokens)
+- Load Level 3: Everything (~40K tokens)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Critical Rules
+
+1. **No User Prompts Between Phases**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
+2. **Immediate Phase Transition**: After TodoWrite update, immediately execute next phase command
+3. **Status-Driven Execution**: Check TodoList status after each phase:
+   - If next task is "pending" → Mark it "in_progress" and execute
+   - If all tasks are "completed" → Report final summary
+4. **Phase Completion Pattern**:
+   ```
+   Phase N completes → Update TodoWrite (N=completed, N+1=in_progress) → Execute Phase N+1
+   ```
+
+### TodoWrite Patterns
+
+#### Initialization (Before Phase 1)
+
+**FIRST ACTION**: Create TodoList with all 4 phases
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+```
+
+**SECOND ACTION**: Execute Phase 1 immediately
+
+#### Full Path (SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = false)
+
+**After Phase 1**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Auto-continue to Phase 2
+```
+
+**After Phase 2**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Auto-continue to Phase 3
+```
+
+**After Phase 3**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Auto-continue to Phase 4
+```
+
+**After Phase 4**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Report completion summary to user
+```
+
+#### Skip Path (SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true)
+
+**After Phase 1** (detects existing docs, skips Phase 2 & 3):
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Display skip message: "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+// Jump directly to Phase 4
+```
+
+**After Phase 4**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Parse arguments and prepare", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing arguments"},
+  {"content": "Call /memory:docs to plan documentation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Calling /memory:docs"},
+  {"content": "Execute documentation generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing documentation"},
+  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md"}
+]})
+// Report completion summary to user
+```
+
+### Execution Flow Diagrams
+
+#### Full Path Flow
+```
+User triggers command
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Initialize 4 phases (Phase 1 = in_progress)
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 1: Parse arguments
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 1 = completed, Phase 2 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 2: Call /memory:docs
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 2 = completed, Phase 3 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 3: Call /workflow:execute
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 3 = completed, Phase 4 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 4: Generate SKILL.md
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 4 = completed
+  ↓
+[Report] Display completion summary
+```
+
+#### Skip Path Flow
+```
+User triggers command
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Initialize 4 phases (Phase 1 = in_progress)
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 1: Parse arguments, detect existing docs
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 1 = completed, Phase 2&3 = completed (skipped), Phase 4 = in_progress
+  ↓
+[Display] Skip message: "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3"
+  ↓
+[Execute] Phase 4: Generate SKILL.md (always runs)
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite] Phase 4 = completed
+  ↓
+[Report] Display completion summary
+```
+
+### Error Handling
+
+- If any phase fails, mark it as "in_progress" (not completed)
+- Report error details to user
+- Do NOT auto-continue to next phase on failure
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--regenerate] [--mode <full|partial>] [--cli-execute]
+```
+
+- **path**: Target directory (default: current directory)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool for documentation (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive documentation
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate all documentation
+  - When enabled: Deletes existing `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/` before regeneration
+  - Ensures fresh documentation from source code
+- **--mode**: Documentation mode (default: full)
+  - `full`: Complete docs (modules + README + ARCHITECTURE + EXAMPLES)
+  - `partial`: Module docs only
+- **--cli-execute**: Enable CLI-based documentation generation (optional)
+  - When enabled: CLI generates docs directly in implementation_approach
+  - When disabled (default): Agent generates documentation content
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Generate SKILL Package (Default)
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects current directory, checks existing docs
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs . --tool gemini --mode full` (Agent Mode)
+3. Phase 3: Executes documentation generation via `/workflow:execute`
+4. Phase 4: Generates SKILL.md at `.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`
+
+### Example 2: Regenerate with Qwen
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory /d/my_app --tool qwen --regenerate
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Parses target path, detects regenerate flag, deletes existing docs
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs /d/my_app --tool qwen --mode full`
+3. Phase 3: Executes documentation regeneration
+4. Phase 4: Generates updated SKILL.md
+
+### Example 3: Partial Mode (Modules Only)
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory --mode partial
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects partial mode
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs . --tool gemini --mode partial` (Agent Mode)
+3. Phase 3: Executes module documentation only
+4. Phase 4: Generates SKILL.md with module-only index
+
+### Example 4: CLI Execute Mode
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory --cli-execute
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects CLI execute mode
+2. Phase 2: Calls `/memory:docs . --tool gemini --mode full --cli-execute` (CLI Mode)
+3. Phase 3: Executes CLI-based documentation generation
+4. Phase 4: Generates SKILL.md at `.claude/skills/{project_name}/SKILL.md`
+
+### Example 5: Skip Path (Existing Docs)
+
+```bash
+/memory:skill-memory
+```
+
+**Scenario**: Documentation already exists in `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/`
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Phase 1: Detects existing docs (5 files), sets SKIP_DOCS_GENERATION = true
+2. Display: "Documentation already exists, skipping Phase 2 and Phase 3. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
+3. Phase 4: Generates or updates SKILL.md index only (~5-10x faster)
+
+---
+
+
+
+## Architecture
+
+```
+skill-memory (orchestrator)
+  ├─ Phase 1: Prepare (bash commands, skip decision)
+  ├─ Phase 2: /memory:docs (task planning, skippable)
+  ├─ Phase 3: /workflow:execute (task execution, skippable)
+  └─ Phase 4: Write SKILL.md (direct file generation, always runs)
+
+No task JSON created by this command
+All documentation tasks managed by /memory:docs
+Smart skip logic: 5-10x faster when docs exist
+```

.claude/commands/memory/style-skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,396 @@
+---
+name: style-skill-memory
+description: Generate SKILL memory package from style reference for easy loading and consistent design system usage
+argument-hint: "[package-name] [--regenerate]"
+allowed-tools: Bash,Read,Write,TodoWrite
+auto-continue: true
+---
+
+# Memory: Style SKILL Memory Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Purpose**: Convert style reference package into SKILL memory for easy loading and context management.
+
+**Input**: Style reference package at `.workflow/reference_style/{package-name}/`
+
+**Output**: SKILL memory index at `.claude/skills/style-{package-name}/SKILL.md`
+
+**Use Case**: Load design system context when working with UI components, analyzing design patterns, or implementing style guidelines.
+
+**Key Features**:
+- Extracts primary design references (colors, typography, spacing, etc.)
+- Provides dynamic adjustment guidelines for design tokens
+- Includes prerequisites and tooling requirements (browsers, PostCSS, dark mode)
+- Progressive loading structure for efficient token usage
+- Complete implementation examples with React components
+- Interactive preview showcase
+
+---
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+/memory:style-skill-memory [package-name] [--regenerate]
+
+# Arguments
+package-name    Style reference package name (required)
+--regenerate    Force regenerate SKILL.md even if it exists (optional)
+```
+
+### Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Generate SKILL memory for package
+/memory:style-skill-memory main-app-style-v1
+
+# Regenerate SKILL memory
+/memory:style-skill-memory main-app-style-v1 --regenerate
+
+# Package name from current directory or default
+/memory:style-skill-memory
+```
+
+### Key Variables
+
+**Input Variables**:
+- `PACKAGE_NAME`: Style reference package name
+- `PACKAGE_DIR`: `.workflow/reference_style/${package_name}`
+- `SKILL_DIR`: `.claude/skills/style-${package_name}`
+- `REGENERATE`: `true` if --regenerate flag, `false` otherwise
+
+**Data Sources** (Phase 2):
+- `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA`: Complete design-tokens.json content (from Read)
+- `LAYOUT_TEMPLATES_DATA`: Complete layout-templates.json content (from Read)
+- `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA`: Complete animation-tokens.json content (from Read, if exists)
+
+**Metadata** (Phase 2):
+- `COMPONENT_COUNT`: Total components
+- `UNIVERSAL_COUNT`: Universal components count
+- `SPECIALIZED_COUNT`: Specialized components count
+- `UNIVERSAL_COMPONENTS`: Universal component names (first 5)
+- `HAS_ANIMATIONS`: Whether animation-tokens.json exists
+
+**Analysis Output** (`DESIGN_ANALYSIS` - Phase 2):
+- `has_colors`: Colors exist
+- `color_semantic`: Has semantic naming (primary/secondary/accent)
+- `uses_oklch`: Uses modern color spaces (oklch, lab, etc.)
+- `has_dark_mode`: Has separate light/dark mode color tokens
+- `spacing_pattern`: Pattern type ("linear", "geometric", "custom")
+- `spacing_scale`: Actual scale values (e.g., [4, 8, 16, 32, 64])
+- `has_typography`: Typography system exists
+- `typography_hierarchy`: Has size scale for hierarchy
+- `uses_calc`: Uses calc() expressions in token values
+- `has_radius`: Border radius exists
+- `radius_style`: Style characteristic ("sharp" <4px, "moderate" 4-8px, "rounded" >8px)
+- `has_shadows`: Shadow system exists
+- `shadow_pattern`: Elevation naming pattern
+- `has_animations`: Animation tokens exist
+- `animation_range`: Duration range (fast to slow)
+- `easing_variety`: Types of easing functions
+
+### Common Errors
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Package not found | Invalid package name or doesn't exist | Run `/workflow:ui-design:codify-style` first |
+| SKILL already exists | SKILL.md already generated | Use `--regenerate` flag |
+| Missing layout-templates.json | Incomplete package | Verify package integrity, re-run codify-style |
+| Invalid JSON format | Corrupted package files | Regenerate package with codify-style |
+
+---
+
+## Execution Process
+
+### Phase 1: Validate Package
+
+**TodoWrite** (First Action):
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "content": "Validate package exists and check SKILL status",
+    "activeForm": "Validating package and SKILL status",
+    "status": "in_progress"
+  },
+  {
+    "content": "Read package data and analyze design system",
+    "activeForm": "Reading package data and analyzing design system",
+    "status": "pending"
+  },
+  {
+    "content": "Generate SKILL.md with design principles and token values",
+    "activeForm": "Generating SKILL.md with design principles and token values",
+    "status": "pending"
+  }
+]
+```
+
+**Step 1: Parse Package Name**
+
+```bash
+# Get package name from argument or auto-detect
+bash(echo "${package_name}" || basename "$(pwd)" | sed 's/^style-//')
+```
+
+**Step 2: Validate Package Exists**
+
+```bash
+bash(test -d .workflow/reference_style/${package_name} && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+**Error Handling**:
+```javascript
+if (package_not_exists) {
+  error("ERROR: Style reference package not found: ${package_name}")
+  error("HINT: Run '/workflow:ui-design:codify-style' first to create package")
+  error("Available packages:")
+  bash(ls -1 .workflow/reference_style/ 2>/dev/null || echo "  (none)")
+  exit(1)
+}
+```
+
+**Step 3: Check SKILL Already Exists**
+
+```bash
+bash(test -f .claude/skills/style-${package_name}/SKILL.md && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+if (skill_exists && !regenerate_flag) {
+  echo("SKILL memory already exists for: ${package_name}")
+  echo("Use --regenerate to force regeneration")
+  exit(0)
+}
+
+if (regenerate_flag && skill_exists) {
+  echo("Regenerating SKILL memory for: ${package_name}")
+}
+```
+
+**TodoWrite Update**: Mark "Validate" as completed, "Read package data" as in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Read Package Data & Analyze Design System
+
+**Step 1: Read All JSON Files**
+
+```bash
+# Read layout templates
+Read(file_path=".workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/layout-templates.json")
+
+# Read design tokens
+Read(file_path=".workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/design-tokens.json")
+
+# Read animation tokens (if exists)
+bash(test -f .workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/animation-tokens.json && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+Read(file_path=".workflow/reference_style/${package_name}/animation-tokens.json")  # if exists
+```
+
+**Step 2: Extract Metadata for Description**
+
+```bash
+# Count components and classify by type
+bash(jq '.layout_templates | length' layout-templates.json)
+bash(jq '[.layout_templates[] | select(.component_type == "universal")] | length' layout-templates.json)
+bash(jq '[.layout_templates[] | select(.component_type == "specialized")] | length' layout-templates.json)
+bash(jq -r '.layout_templates | to_entries[] | select(.value.component_type == "universal") | .key' layout-templates.json | head -5)
+```
+
+Store results in metadata variables (see [Key Variables](#key-variables))
+
+**Step 3: Analyze Design System for Dynamic Principles**
+
+Analyze design-tokens.json to extract characteristics and patterns:
+
+```bash
+# Color system characteristics
+bash(jq '.colors | keys' design-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.colors | to_entries[0:2] | map(.value)' design-tokens.json)
+# Check for modern color spaces
+bash(jq '.colors | to_entries[] | .value | test("oklch|lab|lch")' design-tokens.json)
+# Check for dark mode variants
+bash(jq '.colors | keys | map(select(contains("dark") or contains("light")))' design-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_colors, color_semantic, uses_oklch, has_dark_mode
+
+# Spacing pattern detection
+bash(jq '.spacing | to_entries | map(.value) | map(gsub("[^0-9.]"; "") | tonumber)' design-tokens.json)
+# Analyze pattern: linear (4-8-12-16) vs geometric (4-8-16-32) vs custom
+# → Store: spacing_pattern, spacing_scale
+
+# Typography characteristics
+bash(jq '.typography | keys | map(select(contains("family") or contains("weight")))' design-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.typography | to_entries | map(select(.key | contains("size"))) | .[].value' design-tokens.json)
+# Check for calc() usage
+bash(jq '. | tostring | test("calc\\(")' design-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_typography, typography_hierarchy, uses_calc
+
+# Border radius style
+bash(jq '.border_radius | to_entries | map(.value)' design-tokens.json)
+# Check range: small (sharp <4px) vs moderate (4-8px) vs large (rounded >8px)
+# → Store: has_radius, radius_style
+
+# Shadow characteristics
+bash(jq '.shadows | keys' design-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.shadows | to_entries[0].value' design-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_shadows, shadow_pattern
+
+# Animations (if available)
+bash(jq '.duration | to_entries | map(.value)' animation-tokens.json)
+bash(jq '.easing | keys' animation-tokens.json)
+# → Store: has_animations, animation_range, easing_variety
+```
+
+Store analysis results in `DESIGN_ANALYSIS` (see [Key Variables](#key-variables))
+
+**Note**: Analysis focuses on characteristics and patterns, not counts. Include technical feature detection (oklch, calc, dark mode) for Prerequisites section.
+
+**TodoWrite Update**: Mark "Read package data" as completed, "Generate SKILL.md" as in_progress
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Generate SKILL.md
+
+**Step 1: Create SKILL Directory**
+
+```bash
+bash(mkdir -p .claude/skills/style-${package_name})
+```
+
+**Step 2: Generate Intelligent Description**
+
+**Format**:
+```
+{package_name} project-independent design system with {universal_count} universal layout templates and interactive preview (located at .workflow/reference_style/{package_name}). Load when working with reusable UI components, design tokens, layout patterns, or implementing visual consistency. Excludes {specialized_count} project-specific components.
+```
+
+**Step 3: Load and Process SKILL.md Template**
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - Execute First**:
+```bash
+bash(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/memory/style-skill-memory/skill-md-template.md)
+```
+
+**Template Processing**:
+1. **Replace variables**: Substitute all `{variable}` placeholders with actual values from Phase 2
+2. **Generate dynamic sections**:
+   - **Prerequisites & Tooling**: Generate based on `DESIGN_ANALYSIS` technical features (oklch, calc, dark mode)
+   - **Design Principles**: Generate based on `DESIGN_ANALYSIS` characteristics
+   - **Complete Implementation Example**: Include React component example with token adaptation
+   - **Design Token Values**: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA`, `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA` and display all key-value pairs with DEFAULT annotations
+3. **Write to file**: Use Write tool to save to `.claude/skills/style-{package_name}/SKILL.md`
+
+**Variable Replacement Map**:
+- `{package_name}` → PACKAGE_NAME
+- `{intelligent_description}` → Generated description from Step 2
+- `{component_count}` → COMPONENT_COUNT
+- `{universal_count}` → UNIVERSAL_COUNT
+- `{specialized_count}` → SPECIALIZED_COUNT
+- `{universal_components_list}` → UNIVERSAL_COMPONENTS (comma-separated)
+- `{has_animations}` → HAS_ANIMATIONS
+
+**Dynamic Content Generation**:
+
+See template file for complete structure. Key dynamic sections:
+
+1. **Prerequisites & Tooling** (based on DESIGN_ANALYSIS technical features):
+   - IF uses_oklch → Include PostCSS plugin requirement (`postcss-oklab-function`)
+   - IF uses_calc → Include preprocessor requirement for calc() expressions
+   - IF has_dark_mode → Include dark mode implementation mechanism (class or media query)
+   - ALWAYS include browser support, jq installation, and local server setup
+
+2. **Design Principles** (based on DESIGN_ANALYSIS):
+   - IF has_colors → Include "Color System" principle with semantic pattern
+   - IF spacing_pattern detected → Include "Spatial Rhythm" with unified scale description (actual token values)
+   - IF has_typography_hierarchy → Include "Typographic System" with scale examples
+   - IF has_radius → Include "Shape Language" with style characteristic
+   - IF has_shadows → Include "Depth & Elevation" with elevation pattern
+   - IF has_animations → Include "Motion & Timing" with duration range
+   - ALWAYS include "Accessibility First" principle
+
+3. **Design Token Values** (iterate from read data):
+   - Colors: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.colors`
+   - Typography: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.typography`
+   - Spacing: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.spacing`
+   - Border Radius: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.border_radius` with calc() explanations
+   - Shadows: Iterate `DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA.shadows` with DEFAULT token annotations
+   - Animations (if available): Iterate `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA.duration` and `ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA.easing`
+
+**Step 4: Verify SKILL.md Created**
+
+```bash
+bash(test -f .claude/skills/style-${package_name}/SKILL.md && echo "success" || echo "failed")
+```
+
+**TodoWrite Update**: Mark all todos as completed
+
+---
+
+### Completion Message
+
+Display a simple completion message with key information:
+
+```
+✅ SKILL memory generated for style package: {package_name}
+
+📁 Location: .claude/skills/style-{package_name}/SKILL.md
+
+📊 Package Summary:
+   - {component_count} components ({universal_count} universal, {specialized_count} specialized)
+   - Design tokens: colors, typography, spacing, shadows{animations_note}
+
+💡 Usage: /memory:load-skill-memory style-{package_name} "your task description"
+```
+
+Variables: `{package_name}`, `{component_count}`, `{universal_count}`, `{specialized_count}`, `{animations_note}` (", animations" if exists)
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Critical Rules
+
+1. **Check Before Generate**: Verify package exists before attempting SKILL generation
+2. **Respect Existing SKILL**: Don't overwrite unless --regenerate flag provided
+3. **Load Templates via cat**: Use `cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/memory/style-skill-memory/{template}` to load templates
+4. **Variable Substitution**: Replace all `{variable}` placeholders with actual values
+5. **Technical Feature Detection**: Analyze tokens for modern features (oklch, calc, dark mode) and generate appropriate Prerequisites section
+6. **Dynamic Content Generation**: Generate sections based on DESIGN_ANALYSIS characteristics
+7. **Unified Spacing Scale**: Use actual token values as primary scale reference, avoid contradictory pattern descriptions
+8. **Direct Iteration**: Iterate data structures (DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA, etc.) for token values
+9. **Annotate Special Tokens**: Add comments for DEFAULT tokens and calc() expressions
+10. **Embed jq Commands**: Include bash/jq commands in SKILL.md for dynamic loading
+11. **Progressive Loading**: Include all 3 levels (0-2) with specific jq commands
+12. **Complete Examples**: Include end-to-end implementation examples (React components)
+13. **Intelligent Description**: Extract component count and key features from metadata
+14. **Emphasize Flexibility**: Strongly warn against rigid copying - values are references for creative adaptation
+
+### Template Files Location
+
+
+```
+Phase 1: Validate
+  ├─ Parse package_name
+  ├─ Check PACKAGE_DIR exists
+  └─ Check SKILL_DIR exists (skip if exists and no --regenerate)
+
+Phase 2: Read & Analyze
+  ├─ Read design-tokens.json → DESIGN_TOKENS_DATA
+  ├─ Read layout-templates.json → LAYOUT_TEMPLATES_DATA
+  ├─ Read animation-tokens.json → ANIMATION_TOKENS_DATA (if exists)
+  ├─ Extract Metadata → COMPONENT_COUNT, UNIVERSAL_COUNT, etc.
+  └─ Analyze Design System → DESIGN_ANALYSIS (characteristics)
+
+Phase 3: Generate
+  ├─ Create SKILL directory
+  ├─ Generate intelligent description
+  ├─ Load SKILL.md template (cat command)
+  ├─ Replace variables and generate dynamic content
+  ├─ Write SKILL.md
+  ├─ Verify creation
+  ├─ Load completion message template (cat command)
+  └─ Display completion message
+```

.claude/commands/memory/tech-research-rules.md

@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+---
+name: tech-research-rules
+description: "3-phase orchestrator: extract tech stack → Exa research → generate path-conditional rules (auto-loaded by Claude Code)"
+argument-hint: "[session-id | tech-stack-name] [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Tech Stack Rules Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Purpose**: Generate multi-layered, path-conditional rules that Claude Code automatically loads based on file context.
+
+**Output Structure**:
+```
+.claude/rules/tech/{tech-stack}/
+├── core.md           # paths: **/*.{ext} - Core principles
+├── patterns.md       # paths: src/**/*.{ext} - Implementation patterns
+├── testing.md        # paths: **/*.{test,spec}.{ext} - Testing rules
+├── config.md         # paths: *.config.* - Configuration rules
+├── api.md            # paths: **/api/**/* - API rules (backend only)
+├── components.md     # paths: **/components/**/* - Component rules (frontend only)
+└── metadata.json     # Generation metadata
+```
+
+**Templates Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/`
+
+---
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization
+2. **Path-Conditional Output**: Every rule file includes `paths` frontmatter
+3. **Template-Driven**: Agent reads templates before generating content
+4. **Agent Produces Files**: Agent writes all rule files directly
+5. **No Manual Loading**: Rules auto-activate when Claude works with matching files
+
+---
+
+## 3-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Prepare Context & Detect Tech Stack
+
+**Goal**: Detect input mode, extract tech stack info, determine file extensions
+
+**Input Mode Detection**:
+```bash
+input="$1"
+
+if [[ "$input" == WFS-* ]]; then
+  MODE="session"
+  SESSION_ID="$input"
+  # Read workflow-session.json to extract tech stack
+else
+  MODE="direct"
+  TECH_STACK_NAME="$input"
+fi
+```
+
+**Tech Stack Analysis**:
+```javascript
+// Decompose composite tech stacks
+// "typescript-react-nextjs" → ["typescript", "react", "nextjs"]
+
+const TECH_EXTENSIONS = {
+  "typescript": "{ts,tsx}",
+  "javascript": "{js,jsx}",
+  "python": "py",
+  "rust": "rs",
+  "go": "go",
+  "java": "java",
+  "csharp": "cs",
+  "ruby": "rb",
+  "php": "php"
+};
+
+const FRAMEWORK_TYPE = {
+  "react": "frontend",
+  "vue": "frontend",
+  "angular": "frontend",
+  "nextjs": "fullstack",
+  "nuxt": "fullstack",
+  "fastapi": "backend",
+  "express": "backend",
+  "django": "backend",
+  "rails": "backend"
+};
+```
+
+**Check Existing Rules**:
+```bash
+normalized_name=$(echo "$TECH_STACK_NAME" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '-')
+rules_dir=".claude/rules/tech/${normalized_name}"
+existing_count=$(find "${rules_dir}" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Skip Decision**:
+- If `existing_count > 0` AND no `--regenerate` → `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+- If `--regenerate` → Delete existing and regenerate
+
+**Output Variables**:
+- `TECH_STACK_NAME`: Normalized name
+- `PRIMARY_LANG`: Primary language
+- `FILE_EXT`: File extension pattern
+- `FRAMEWORK_TYPE`: frontend | backend | fullstack | library
+- `COMPONENTS`: Array of tech components
+- `SKIP_GENERATION`: Boolean
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Produces Path-Conditional Rules
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skipped if `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+
+**Goal**: Delegate to agent for Exa research and rule file generation
+
+**Template Files**:
+```
+~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/
+├── tech-rules-agent-prompt.txt  # Agent instructions
+├── rule-core.txt                # Core principles template
+├── rule-patterns.txt            # Implementation patterns template
+├── rule-testing.txt             # Testing rules template
+├── rule-config.txt              # Configuration rules template
+├── rule-api.txt                 # API rules template (backend)
+└── rule-components.txt          # Component rules template (frontend)
+```
+
+**Agent Task**:
+
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
+  description: `Generate tech stack rules: ${TECH_STACK_NAME}`,
+  prompt: `
+You are generating path-conditional rules for Claude Code.
+
+## Context
+- Tech Stack: ${TECH_STACK_NAME}
+- Primary Language: ${PRIMARY_LANG}
+- File Extensions: ${FILE_EXT}
+- Framework Type: ${FRAMEWORK_TYPE}
+- Components: ${JSON.stringify(COMPONENTS)}
+- Output Directory: .claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/
+
+## Instructions
+
+Read the agent prompt template for detailed instructions:
+$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/tech-rules-agent-prompt.txt)
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+1. Execute Exa research queries (see agent prompt)
+2. Read each rule template
+3. Generate rule files following template structure
+4. Write files to output directory
+5. Write metadata.json
+6. Report completion
+
+## Variable Substitutions
+
+Replace in templates:
+- {TECH_STACK_NAME} → ${TECH_STACK_NAME}
+- {PRIMARY_LANG} → ${PRIMARY_LANG}
+- {FILE_EXT} → ${FILE_EXT}
+- {FRAMEWORK_TYPE} → ${FRAMEWORK_TYPE}
+`
+})
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- 4-6 rule files written with proper `paths` frontmatter
+- metadata.json written
+- Agent reports files created
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Verify & Report
+
+**Goal**: Verify generated files and provide usage summary
+
+**Steps**:
+
+1. **Verify Files**:
+   ```bash
+   find ".claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}" -name "*.md" -type f
+   ```
+
+2. **Validate Frontmatter**:
+   ```bash
+   head -5 ".claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/core.md"
+   ```
+
+3. **Read Metadata**:
+   ```javascript
+   Read(`.claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/metadata.json`)
+   ```
+
+4. **Generate Summary Report**:
+   ```
+   Tech Stack Rules Generated
+
+   Tech Stack: {TECH_STACK_NAME}
+   Location: .claude/rules/tech/{TECH_STACK_NAME}/
+
+   Files Created:
+   ├── core.md         → paths: **/*.{ext}
+   ├── patterns.md     → paths: src/**/*.{ext}
+   ├── testing.md      → paths: **/*.{test,spec}.{ext}
+   ├── config.md       → paths: *.config.*
+   ├── api.md          → paths: **/api/**/* (if backend)
+   └── components.md   → paths: **/components/**/* (if frontend)
+
+   Auto-Loading:
+   - Rules apply automatically when editing matching files
+   - No manual loading required
+
+   Example Activation:
+   - Edit src/components/Button.tsx → core.md + patterns.md + components.md
+   - Edit tests/api.test.ts → core.md + testing.md
+   - Edit package.json → config.md
+   ```
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
+
+---
+
+## Path Pattern Reference
+
+| Pattern | Matches |
+|---------|---------|
+| `**/*.ts` | All .ts files |
+| `src/**/*` | All files under src/ |
+| `*.config.*` | Config files in root |
+| `**/*.{ts,tsx}` | .ts and .tsx files |
+
+| Tech Stack | Core Pattern | Test Pattern |
+|------------|--------------|--------------|
+| TypeScript | `**/*.{ts,tsx}` | `**/*.{test,spec}.{ts,tsx}` |
+| Python | `**/*.py` | `**/test_*.py, **/*_test.py` |
+| Rust | `**/*.rs` | `**/tests/**/*.rs` |
+| Go | `**/*.go` | `**/*_test.go` |
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research [session-id | "tech-stack-name"] [--regenerate]
+```
+
+**Arguments**:
+- **session-id**: `WFS-*` format - Extract from workflow session
+- **tech-stack-name**: Direct input - `"typescript"`, `"typescript-react"`
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate existing rules
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+### Single Language
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "typescript"
+```
+
+**Output**: `.claude/rules/tech/typescript/` with 4 rule files
+
+### Frontend Stack
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "typescript-react"
+```
+
+**Output**: `.claude/rules/tech/typescript-react/` with 5 rule files (includes components.md)
+
+### Backend Stack
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "python-fastapi"
+```
+
+**Output**: `.claude/rules/tech/python-fastapi/` with 5 rule files (includes api.md)
+
+### From Session
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research WFS-user-auth-20251104
+```
+
+**Workflow**: Extract tech stack from session → Generate rules
+
+---
+
+## Comparison: Rules vs SKILL
+
+| Aspect | SKILL Memory | Rules |
+|--------|--------------|-------|
+| Loading | Manual: `Skill("tech")` | Automatic by path |
+| Scope | All files when loaded | Only matching files |
+| Granularity | Monolithic packages | Per-file-type |
+| Context | Full package | Only relevant rules |
+
+**When to Use**:
+- **Rules**: Tech stack conventions per file type
+- **SKILL**: Reference docs, APIs, examples for manual lookup

.claude/commands/memory/update-full.md

@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+---
+name: update-full
+description: Update all CLAUDE.md files using layer-based execution (Layer 3→1) with batched agents (4 modules/agent) and gemini→qwen→codex fallback, <20 modules uses direct parallel
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex] [--path <directory>]"
+---
+
+# Full Documentation Update (/memory:update-full)
+
+## Overview
+
+Orchestrates project-wide CLAUDE.md updates using batched agent execution with automatic tool fallback and 3-layer architecture support.
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`: Primary tool (default: gemini)
+- `--path <directory>`: Target specific directory (default: entire project)
+
+**Execution Flow**: Discovery → Plan Presentation → Execution → Safety Verification
+
+## 3-Layer Architecture & Auto-Strategy Selection
+
+### Layer Definition & Strategy Assignment
+
+| Layer | Depth | Strategy | Purpose | Context Pattern |
+|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------------|
+| **Layer 3** (Deepest) | ≥3 | `multi-layer` | Handle unstructured files, generate docs for all subdirectories | `@**/*` (all files) |
+| **Layer 2** (Middle) | 1-2 | `single-layer` | Aggregate from children + current code | `@*/CLAUDE.md @*.{ts,tsx,js,...}` |
+| **Layer 1** (Top) | 0 | `single-layer` | Aggregate from children + current code | `@*/CLAUDE.md @*.{ts,tsx,js,...}` |
+
+**Update Direction**: Layer 3 → Layer 2 → Layer 1 (bottom-up dependency flow)
+
+**Strategy Auto-Selection**: Strategies are automatically determined by directory depth - no user configuration needed.
+
+### Strategy Details
+
+#### Multi-Layer Strategy (Layer 3 Only)
+- **Use Case**: Deepest directories with unstructured file layouts
+- **Behavior**: Generates CLAUDE.md for current directory AND each subdirectory containing files
+- **Context**: All files in current directory tree (`@**/*`)
+
+
+#### Single-Layer Strategy (Layers 1-2)
+- **Use Case**: Upper layers that aggregate from existing documentation
+- **Behavior**: Generates CLAUDE.md only for current directory
+- **Context**: Direct children CLAUDE.md files + current directory code files
+
+### Example Flow
+```
+src/auth/handlers/ (depth 3) → MULTI-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @**/* (all files in handlers/ and subdirs)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md + CLAUDE.md in each subdir with files
+  ↓
+src/auth/ (depth 2) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/CLAUDE.md @*.ts (handlers/CLAUDE.md + current code)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md only
+  ↓
+src/ (depth 1) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/CLAUDE.md (auth/CLAUDE.md, utils/CLAUDE.md)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md only
+  ↓
+./ (depth 0) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
+  CONTEXT: @*/CLAUDE.md (src/CLAUDE.md, tests/CLAUDE.md)
+  GENERATES: ./CLAUDE.md only
+```
+
+## Core Execution Rules
+
+1. **Analyze First**: Git cache + module discovery before updates
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Execution Strategy**:
+   - **<20 modules**: Direct parallel execution (max 4 concurrent per layer)
+   - **≥20 modules**: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent, 73% overhead reduction)
+4. **Tool Fallback**: Auto-retry with fallback tools on failure
+5. **Layer Sequential**: Process layers 3→2→1 (bottom-up), parallel batches within layer
+6. **Safety Check**: Verify only CLAUDE.md files modified
+7. **Layer-based Grouping**: Group modules by LAYER (not depth) for execution
+
+## Tool Fallback Hierarchy
+
+```javascript
+--tool gemini  →  [gemini, qwen, codex]  // default
+--tool qwen    →  [qwen, gemini, codex]
+--tool codex   →  [codex, gemini, qwen]
+```
+
+**Trigger**: Non-zero exit code from update script
+
+| Tool   | Best For                       | Fallback To    |
+|--------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| gemini | Documentation, patterns        | qwen → codex   |
+| qwen   | Architecture, system design    | gemini → codex |
+| codex  | Implementation, code quality   | gemini → qwen  |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Analysis
+
+```javascript
+// Cache git changes
+Bash({command: "git add -A 2>/dev/null || true", run_in_background: false});
+
+// Get module structure
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
+
+// OR with --path
+Bash({command: "cd <target-path> && ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` to extract module paths and count.
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/docs based on project tech stack.
+
+### Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**For <20 modules**:
+```
+Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Total: 7 modules
+  Execution: Direct parallel (< 20 modules threshold)
+
+  Will update:
+  - ./core/interfaces (12 files) - depth 2 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - ./core (22 files) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - ./models (9 files) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - ./utils (12 files) - depth 1 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  - . (5 files) - depth 0 [Layer 1] - single-layer strategy
+
+  Context Strategy (Auto-Selected):
+  - Layer 2 (depth 1-2): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+  - Layer 1 (depth 0): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+
+  Auto-skipped: ./tests, __pycache__, setup.py (15 paths)
+  Execution order: Layer 2 → Layer 1
+  Estimated time: ~5-10 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**For ≥20 modules**:
+```
+Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Total: 31 modules
+  Execution: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent)
+
+  Will update:
+  - ./src/features/auth (12 files) - depth 3 [Layer 3] - multi-layer strategy
+  - ./.claude/commands/cli (6 files) - depth 3 [Layer 3] - multi-layer strategy
+  - ./src/utils (8 files) - depth 2 [Layer 2] - single-layer strategy
+  ...
+
+  Context Strategy (Auto-Selected):
+  - Layer 3 (depth ≥3): @**/* (all files)
+  - Layer 2 (depth 1-2): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+  - Layer 1 (depth 0): @*/CLAUDE.md + current code files
+  
+  Auto-skipped: ./tests, __pycache__, setup.py (15 paths)
+  Execution order: Layer 2 → Layer 1
+  Estimated time: ~5-10 minutes
+
+  Agent allocation (by LAYER):
+  - Layer 3 (14 modules, depth ≥3): 4 agents [4, 4, 4, 2]
+  - Layer 2 (15 modules, depth 1-2): 4 agents [4, 4, 4, 3]
+  - Layer 1 (2 modules, depth 0): 1 agent [2]
+
+  Estimated time: ~15-25 minutes
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+### Phase 3A: Direct Execution (<20 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Parallel execution within layer (max 4 concurrent), no agent overhead.
+
+**CRITICAL**: All Bash commands use `run_in_background: false` for synchronous execution.
+
+```javascript
+for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
+  if (modules_by_layer[layer].length === 0) continue;
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_layer[layer], 4);
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    let parallel_tasks = batch.map(module => {
+      return async () => {
+        let strategy = module.depth >= 3 ? "multi-layer" : "single-layer";
+        for (let tool of tool_order) {
+          Bash({
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"${strategy}","path":".","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+            run_in_background: false
+          });
+          if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+            report(`✅ ${module.path} (Layer ${layer}) updated with ${tool}`);
+            return true;
+          }
+        }
+        report(`❌ FAILED: ${module.path} (Layer ${layer}) failed all tools`);
+        return false;
+      };
+    });
+    await Promise.all(parallel_tasks.map(task => task()));
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3B: Agent Batch Execution (≥20 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Batch modules into groups of 4, spawn memory-bridge agents per batch.
+
+```javascript
+// Group modules by LAYER and batch within each layer
+let modules_by_layer = group_by_layer(module_list);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+
+for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
+  if (modules_by_layer[layer].length === 0) continue;
+
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_layer[layer], 4);
+  let worker_tasks = [];
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    worker_tasks.push(
+      Task(
+        subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+        description=`Update ${batch.length} modules in Layer ${layer}`,
+        prompt=generate_batch_worker_prompt(batch, tool_order, layer)
+      )
+    );
+  }
+
+  await parallel_execute(worker_tasks);
+}
+```
+
+**Batch Worker Prompt Template**:
+```
+PURPOSE: Update CLAUDE.md for assigned modules with tool fallback
+
+TASK: Update documentation for assigned modules using specified strategies.
+
+MODULES:
+{{module_path_1}} (strategy: {{strategy_1}})
+{{module_path_2}} (strategy: {{strategy_2}})
+...
+
+TOOLS (try in order): {{tool_1}}, {{tool_2}}, {{tool_3}}
+
+EXECUTION SCRIPT: ccw tool exec update_module_claude
+  - Accepts strategy parameter: multi-layer | single-layer
+  - Tool execution via direct CLI commands (gemini/qwen/codex)
+
+EXECUTION FLOW (for each module):
+  1. Tool fallback loop (exit on first success):
+     for tool in {{tool_1}} {{tool_2}} {{tool_3}}; do
+       Bash({
+         command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"{{strategy}}","path":".","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+         run_in_background: false
+       })
+       exit_code=$?
+
+       if [ $exit_code -eq 0 ]; then
+         report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with $tool"
+         break
+       else
+         report "⚠️  {{module_path}} failed with $tool, trying next..."
+         continue
+       fi
+     done
+
+  2. Handle complete failure (all tools failed):
+     if [ $exit_code -ne 0 ]; then
+       report "❌ FAILED: {{module_path}} - all tools exhausted"
+       # Continue to next module (do not abort batch)
+     fi
+
+FAILURE HANDLING:
+  - Module-level isolation: One module's failure does not affect others
+  - Exit code detection: Non-zero exit code triggers next tool
+  - Exhaustion reporting: Log modules where all tools failed
+  - Batch continuation: Always process remaining modules
+
+REPORTING FORMAT:
+  Per-module status:
+    ✅ path/to/module updated with {tool}
+    ⚠️  path/to/module failed with {tool}, trying next...
+    ❌ FAILED: path/to/module - all tools exhausted
+```
+### Phase 4: Safety Verification
+
+```javascript
+// Check only CLAUDE.md files modified
+Bash({command: 'git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "Only CLAUDE.md files modified"', run_in_background: false});
+
+// Display status
+Bash({command: "git status --short", run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Result Summary**:
+```
+Update Summary:
+  Total: 31 | Success: 29 | Failed: 2
+  Tool usage: gemini: 25, qwen: 4, codex: 0
+  Failed: path1, path2
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Batch Worker**: Tool fallback per module, batch isolation, clear status reporting
+**Coordinator**: Invalid path abort, user decline handling, safety check with auto-revert
+**Fallback Triggers**: Non-zero exit code, script timeout, unexpected output
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Full project update (auto-strategy selection)
+/memory:update-full
+
+# Target specific directory
+/memory:update-full --path .claude
+/memory:update-full --path src/features/auth
+
+# Use specific tool
+/memory:update-full --tool qwen
+/memory:update-full --path .claude --tool qwen
+```
+
+## Key Advantages
+
+- **Efficiency**: 30 modules → 8 agents (73% reduction from sequential)
+- **Resilience**: 3-tier tool fallback per module
+- **Performance**: Parallel batches, no concurrency limits
+- **Observability**: Per-module tool usage, batch-level metrics
+- **Automation**: Zero configuration - strategy auto-selected by directory depth

.claude/commands/memory/update-related.md

@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+---
+name: update-related
+description: Update CLAUDE.md for git-changed modules using batched agent execution (4 modules/agent) with gemini→qwen→codex fallback, <15 modules uses direct execution
+argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
+---
+
+# Related Documentation Update (/memory:update-related)
+
+## Overview
+
+Orchestrates context-aware CLAUDE.md updates for changed modules using batched agent execution with automatic tool fallback (gemini→qwen→codex).
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>`: Primary tool (default: gemini)
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. Change Detection → 2. Plan Presentation → 3. Batched Agent Execution → 4. Safety Verification
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Detect Changes First**: Use git diff to identify affected modules
+2. **Wait for Approval**: Present plan, no execution without user confirmation
+3. **Execution Strategy**:
+   - <15 modules: Direct parallel execution (max 4 concurrent per depth, no agent overhead)
+   - ≥15 modules: Agent batch processing (4 modules/agent, 73% overhead reduction)
+4. **Tool Fallback**: Auto-retry with fallback tools on failure
+5. **Depth Sequential**: Process depths N→0, parallel batches within depth (both modes)
+6. **Related Mode**: Update only changed modules and their parent contexts
+
+## Tool Fallback Hierarchy
+
+```javascript
+--tool gemini  →  [gemini, qwen, codex]  // default
+--tool qwen    →  [qwen, gemini, codex]
+--tool codex   →  [codex, gemini, qwen]
+```
+
+**Trigger**: Non-zero exit code from update script
+
+## Phase 1: Change Detection & Analysis
+
+```javascript
+// Detect changed modules
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec detect_changed_modules '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
+
+// Cache git changes
+Bash({command: "git add -A 2>/dev/null || true", run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|change:<TYPE>` to extract affected modules.
+
+**Smart filter**: Auto-detect and skip tests/build/config/docs based on project tech stack (Node.js/Python/Go/Rust/etc).
+
+**Fallback**: If no changes detected, use recent modules (first 10 by depth).
+
+## Phase 2: Plan Presentation
+
+**Present filtered plan**:
+```
+Related Update Plan:
+  Tool: gemini (fallback: qwen → codex)
+  Changed: 4 modules | Batching: 4 modules/agent
+
+  Will update:
+  - ./src/api/auth (5 files) [new module]
+  - ./src/api (12 files) [parent of changed auth/]
+  - ./src (8 files) [parent context]
+  - . (14 files) [root level]
+
+  Auto-skipped (12 paths):
+  - Tests: ./src/api/auth.test.ts (8 paths)
+  - Config: tsconfig.json (3 paths)
+  - Other: node_modules (1 path)
+
+  Agent allocation:
+  - Depth 3 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 2 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 1 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+  - Depth 0 (1 module): 1 agent [1]
+
+  Confirm execution? (y/n)
+```
+
+**Decision logic**:
+- User confirms "y": Proceed with execution
+- User declines "n": Abort, no changes
+- <15 modules: Direct execution
+- ≥15 modules: Agent batch execution
+
+## Phase 3A: Direct Execution (<15 modules)
+
+**Strategy**: Parallel execution within depth (max 4 concurrent), no agent overhead.
+
+**CRITICAL**: All Bash commands use `run_in_background: false` for synchronous execution.
+
+```javascript
+for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_depth[depth], 4);
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    let parallel_tasks = batch.map(module => {
+      return async () => {
+        for (let tool of tool_order) {
+          Bash({
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
+            run_in_background: false
+          });
+          if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
+            report(`✅ ${module.path} updated with ${tool}`);
+            return true;
+          }
+        }
+        report(`❌ FAILED: ${module.path} failed all tools`);
+        return false;
+      };
+    });
+    await Promise.all(parallel_tasks.map(task => task()));
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3B: Agent Batch Execution (≥15 modules)
+
+### Batching Strategy
+
+```javascript
+// Batch modules into groups of 4
+function batch_modules(modules, batch_size = 4) {
+  let batches = [];
+  for (let i = 0; i < modules.length; i += batch_size) {
+    batches.push(modules.slice(i, i + batch_size));
+  }
+  return batches;
+}
+// Examples: 10→[4,4,2] | 8→[4,4] | 3→[3]
+```
+
+### Coordinator Orchestration
+
+```javascript
+let modules_by_depth = group_by_depth(changed_modules);
+let tool_order = construct_tool_order(primary_tool);
+
+for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
+  let batches = batch_modules(modules_by_depth[depth], 4);
+  let worker_tasks = [];
+
+  for (let batch of batches) {
+    worker_tasks.push(
+      Task(
+        subagent_type="memory-bridge",
+        description=`Update ${batch.length} modules at depth ${depth}`,
+        prompt=generate_batch_worker_prompt(batch, tool_order, "related")
+      )
+    );
+  }
+
+  await parallel_execute(worker_tasks);  // Batches run in parallel
+}
+```
+
+### Batch Worker Prompt Template
+
+```
+PURPOSE: Update CLAUDE.md for assigned modules with tool fallback (related mode)
+
+TASK:
+Update documentation for the following modules based on recent changes. For each module, try tools in order until success.
+
+MODULES:
+{{module_path_1}}
+{{module_path_2}}
+{{module_path_3}}
+{{module_path_4}}
+
+TOOLS (try in order):
+1. {{tool_1}}
+2. {{tool_2}}
+3. {{tool_3}}
+
+EXECUTION:
+For each module above:
+  1. Try tool 1:
+     Bash({
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"{{tool_1}}"}'`,
+       run_in_background: false
+     })
+     → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with {{tool_1}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Try tool 2
+  2. Try tool 2:
+     Bash({
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"{{tool_2}}"}'`,
+       run_in_background: false
+     })
+     → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with {{tool_2}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Try tool 3
+  3. Try tool 3:
+     Bash({
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"{{tool_3}}"}'`,
+       run_in_background: false
+     })
+     → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with {{tool_3}}", proceed to next module
+     → Failure: Report "❌ FAILED: {{module_path}} failed all tools", proceed to next module
+
+REPORTING:
+Report final summary with:
+- Total processed: X modules
+- Successful: Y modules
+- Failed: Z modules
+- Tool usage: {{tool_1}}:X, {{tool_2}}:Y, {{tool_3}}:Z
+```
+
+## Phase 4: Safety Verification
+
+```javascript
+// Check only CLAUDE.md modified
+Bash({command: 'git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || echo "Only CLAUDE.md files modified"', run_in_background: false});
+
+// Display statistics
+Bash({command: "git diff --stat", run_in_background: false});
+```
+
+**Aggregate results**:
+```
+Update Summary:
+  Total: 4 | Success: 4 | Failed: 0
+
+  Tool usage:
+  - gemini: 4 modules
+  - qwen: 0 modules (fallback)
+  - codex: 0 modules
+
+  Changes:
+  src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++
+  src/api/CLAUDE.md       | 23 +++++++++--
+  src/CLAUDE.md           | 12 ++++--
+  CLAUDE.md               | 8 ++--
+  4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+```
+
+## Execution Summary
+
+**Module Count Threshold**:
+- **<15 modules**: Coordinator executes Phase 3A (Direct Execution)
+- **≥15 modules**: Coordinator executes Phase 3B (Agent Batch Execution)
+
+**Agent Hierarchy** (for ≥15 modules):
+- **Coordinator**: Handles batch division, spawns worker agents per depth
+- **Worker Agents**: Each processes 4 modules with tool fallback (related mode)
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Batch Worker**:
+- Tool fallback per module (auto-retry)
+- Batch isolation (failures don't propagate)
+- Clear per-module status reporting
+
+**Coordinator**:
+- No changes: Use fallback (recent 10 modules)
+- User decline: No execution
+- Safety check fail: Auto-revert staging
+- Partial failures: Continue execution, report failed modules
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+- Non-zero exit code
+- Script timeout
+- Unexpected output
+
+## Tool Reference
+
+| Tool   | Best For                       | Fallback To    |
+|--------|--------------------------------|----------------|
+| gemini | Documentation, patterns        | qwen → codex   |
+| qwen   | Architecture, system design    | gemini → codex |
+| codex  | Implementation, code quality   | gemini → qwen  |
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+```bash
+# Daily development update
+/memory:update-related
+
+# After feature work with specific tool
+/memory:update-related --tool qwen
+
+# Code quality review after implementation
+/memory:update-related --tool codex
+```
+
+## Key Advantages
+
+**Efficiency**: 30 modules → 8 agents (73% reduction)
+**Resilience**: 3-tier fallback per module
+**Performance**: Parallel batches, no concurrency limits
+**Context-aware**: Updates based on actual git changes
+**Fast**: Only affected modules, not entire project
+
+## Coordinator Checklist
+
+- Parse `--tool` (default: gemini)
+- Refresh code index for accurate change detection
+- Detect changed modules via detect_changed_modules.sh
+- **Smart filter modules** (auto-detect tech stack, skip tests/build/config/docs)
+- Cache git changes
+- Apply fallback if no changes (recent 10 modules)
+- Construct tool fallback order
+- **Present filtered plan** with skip reasons and change types
+- **Wait for y/n confirmation**
+- Determine execution mode:
+  - **<15 modules**: Direct execution (Phase 3A)
+    - For each depth (N→0): Sequential module updates with tool fallback
+  - **≥15 modules**: Agent batch execution (Phase 3B)
+    - For each depth (N→0): Batch modules (4 per batch), spawn batch workers in parallel
+- Wait for depth/batch completion
+- Aggregate results
+- Safety check (only CLAUDE.md modified)
+- Display git diff statistics + summary
+
+## Comparison with Full Update
+
+| Aspect | Related Update | Full Update |
+|--------|----------------|-------------|
+| **Scope** | Changed modules only | All project modules |
+| **Speed** | Fast (minutes) | Slower (10-30 min) |
+| **Use case** | Daily development | Major refactoring |
+| **Mode** | `"related"` | `"full"` |
+| **Trigger** | After commits | After major changes |
+| **Batching** | 4 modules/agent | 4 modules/agent |
+| **Fallback** | gemini→qwen→codex | gemini→qwen→codex |
+| **Complexity threshold** | ≤15 modules | ≤20 modules |

.claude/commands/memory/workflow-skill-memory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+---
+name: workflow-skill-memory
+description: Process WFS-* archived sessions using universal-executor agents with Gemini analysis to generate workflow-progress SKILL package (sessions-timeline, lessons, conflicts)
+argument-hint: "session <session-id> | all"
+allowed-tools: Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow SKILL Memory Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+Generate SKILL package from archived workflow sessions using agent-driven analysis. Supports single-session incremental updates or parallel processing of all sessions.
+
+**Scope**: Only processes WFS-* workflow sessions. Other session types (e.g., doc sessions) are automatically ignored.
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory session WFS-<session-id>   # Process single WFS session
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory all                        # Process all WFS sessions in parallel
+```
+
+## Execution Modes
+
+### Mode 1: Single Session (`session <session-id>`)
+
+**Purpose**: Incremental update - process one archived session and merge into existing SKILL package
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. **Validate session**: Check if session exists in `.workflow/.archives/{session-id}/`
+2. **Invoke agent**: Call `universal-executor` to analyze session and update SKILL documents
+3. **Agent tasks**:
+   - Read session data from `.workflow/.archives/{session-id}/`
+   - Extract lessons, conflicts, and outcomes
+   - Use Gemini for intelligent aggregation (optional)
+   - Update or create SKILL documents using templates
+   - Regenerate SKILL.md index
+
+**Command Example**:
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory session WFS-user-auth
+```
+
+**Expected Output**:
+```
+Session WFS-user-auth processed
+Updated:
+- sessions-timeline.md (1 session added)
+- lessons-learned.md (3 lessons merged)
+- conflict-patterns.md (1 conflict added)
+- SKILL.md (index regenerated)
+```
+
+---
+
+### Mode 2: All Sessions (`all`)
+
+**Purpose**: Full regeneration - process all archived sessions in parallel for complete SKILL package
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. **List sessions**: Read manifest.json to get all archived session IDs
+2. **Parallel invocation**: Launch multiple `universal-executor` agents in parallel (one per session)
+3. **Agent coordination**:
+   - Each agent processes one session independently
+   - Agents use Gemini for analysis
+   - Agents collect data into JSON (no direct file writes)
+   - Final aggregator agent merges results and generates SKILL documents
+
+**Command Example**:
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory all
+```
+
+**Expected Output**:
+```
+All sessions processed in parallel
+Sessions: 8 total
+Updated:
+- sessions-timeline.md (8 sessions)
+- lessons-learned.md (24 lessons aggregated)
+- conflict-patterns.md (12 conflicts documented)
+- SKILL.md (index regenerated)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Validation and Setup
+
+**Step 1.1: Parse Command Arguments**
+
+Extract mode and session ID:
+```javascript
+if (args === "all") {
+  mode = "all"
+} else if (args.startsWith("session ")) {
+  mode = "session"
+  session_id = args.replace("session ", "").trim()
+} else {
+  ERROR = "Invalid arguments. Usage: session <session-id> | all"
+  EXIT
+}
+```
+
+**Step 1.2: Validate Archive Directory**
+```bash
+bash(test -d .workflow/.archives && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+If missing, report error and exit.
+
+**Step 1.3: Mode-Specific Validation**
+
+**Single Session Mode**:
+```bash
+# Validate session ID format (must start with WFS-)
+if [[ ! "$session_id" =~ ^WFS- ]]; then
+  ERROR = "Invalid session ID format. Only WFS-* sessions are supported"
+  EXIT
+fi
+
+# Check if session exists
+bash(test -d .workflow/.archives/{session_id} && echo "exists" || echo "missing")
+```
+
+If missing, report error: "Session {session_id} not found in archives"
+
+**All Sessions Mode**:
+```bash
+# Read manifest and filter only WFS- sessions
+bash(cat .workflow/.archives/manifest.json | jq -r '.archives[].session_id | select(startswith("WFS-"))')
+```
+
+Store filtered session IDs in array. Ignore doc sessions and other non-WFS sessions.
+
+**Step 1.4: TodoWrite Initialization**
+
+**Single Session Mode**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Validate session existence", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Validating session"},
+  {"content": "Invoke agent to process session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Invoking agent"},
+  {"content": "Verify SKILL package updated", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Verifying update"}
+]})
+```
+
+**All Sessions Mode**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({todos: [
+  {"content": "Read manifest and list sessions", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Reading manifest"},
+  {"content": "Invoke agents in parallel", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Invoking agents"},
+  {"content": "Verify SKILL package regenerated", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Verifying regeneration"}
+]})
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Invocation
+
+#### Single Session Mode - Agent Task
+
+Invoke `universal-executor` with session-specific task:
+
+**Agent Prompt Structure**:
+```
+Task: Process Workflow Session for SKILL Package
+
+Context:
+- Session ID: {session_id}
+- Session Path: .workflow/.archives/{session_id}/
+- Mode: Incremental update
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Read session data:
+   - workflow-session.json (metadata)
+   - IMPL_PLAN.md (implementation summary)
+   - TODO_LIST.md (if exists)
+   - manifest.json entry for lessons
+
+2. Extract key information:
+   - Description, tags, metrics
+   - Lessons (successes, challenges, watch_patterns)
+   - Context package path (reference only)
+   - Key outcomes from IMPL_PLAN
+
+3. Use Gemini for aggregation (optional):
+   Command pattern:
+   ccw cli -p "
+   PURPOSE: Extract lessons and conflicts from workflow session
+   TASK:
+   • Analyze IMPL_PLAN and lessons from manifest
+   • Identify success patterns and challenges
+   • Extract conflict patterns with resolutions
+   • Categorize by functional domain
+   MODE: analysis
+   CONTEXT: @IMPL_PLAN.md @workflow-session.json
+   EXPECTED: Structured lessons and conflicts in JSON format
+   RULES: Template reference from skill-aggregation.txt
+   " --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd .workflow/.archives/{session_id}
+
+3.5. **Generate SKILL.md Description** (CRITICAL for auto-loading):
+
+   Read skill-index.txt template Section: "Description Field Generation"
+
+   Execute command to get project root:
+   ```bash
+   git rev-parse --show-toplevel  # Example output: /d/Claude_dms3
+   ```
+
+   Apply description format:
+   ```
+   Progressive workflow development history (located at {project_root}).
+   Load this SKILL when continuing development, analyzing past implementations,
+   or learning from workflow history, especially when no relevant context exists in memory.
+   ```
+
+   **Validation**:
+   - [ ] Path uses forward slashes (not backslashes)
+   - [ ] All three use cases present
+   - [ ] Trigger optimization phrase included
+   - [ ] Path is absolute (starts with / or drive letter)
+
+4. Read templates for formatting guidance:
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-sessions-timeline.txt
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-lessons-learned.txt
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-conflict-patterns.txt
+   - ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/skill-index.txt
+
+   **CRITICAL**: From skill-index.txt, read these sections:
+   - "Description Field Generation" - Rules for generating description
+   - "Variable Substitution Guide" - All required variables
+   - "Generation Instructions" - Step-by-step generation process
+   - "Validation Checklist" - Final validation steps
+
+5. Update SKILL documents:
+   - sessions-timeline.md: Append new session, update domain grouping
+   - lessons-learned.md: Merge lessons into categories, update frequencies
+   - conflict-patterns.md: Add conflicts, update recurring pattern frequencies
+   - SKILL.md: Regenerate index with updated counts
+
+   **For SKILL.md generation**:
+   - Follow "Generation Instructions" from skill-index.txt (Steps 1-7)
+   - Use git command for project_root: `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`
+   - Apply "Description Field Generation" rules
+   - Validate using "Validation Checklist"
+   - Increment version (patch level)
+
+6. Return result JSON:
+   {
+     "status": "success",
+     "session_id": "{session_id}",
+     "updates": {
+       "sessions_added": 1,
+       "lessons_merged": count,
+       "conflicts_added": count
+     }
+   }
+```
+
+---
+
+#### All Sessions Mode - Parallel Agent Tasks
+
+**Step 2.1: Launch parallel session analyzers**
+
+Invoke multiple agents in parallel (one message with multiple Task calls):
+
+**Per-Session Agent Prompt**:
+```
+Task: Extract Session Data for SKILL Package
+
+Context:
+- Session ID: {session_id}
+- Mode: Parallel analysis (no direct file writes)
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Read session data (same as single mode)
+
+2. Extract key information (same as single mode)
+
+3. Use Gemini for analysis (same as single mode)
+
+4. Return structured data JSON:
+   {
+     "status": "success",
+     "session_id": "{session_id}",
+     "data": {
+       "metadata": {
+         "description": "...",
+         "archived_at": "...",
+         "tags": [...],
+         "metrics": {...}
+       },
+       "lessons": {
+         "successes": [...],
+         "challenges": [...],
+         "watch_patterns": [...]
+       },
+       "conflicts": [
+         {
+           "type": "architecture|dependencies|testing|performance",
+           "pattern": "...",
+           "resolution": "...",
+           "code_impact": [...]
+         }
+       ],
+       "impl_summary": "First 200 chars of IMPL_PLAN",
+       "context_package_path": "..."
+     }
+   }
+```
+
+**Step 2.2: Aggregate results**
+
+After all session agents complete, invoke aggregator agent:
+
+**Aggregator Agent Prompt**:
+```
+Task: Aggregate Session Results and Generate SKILL Package
+
+Context:
+- Mode: Full regeneration
+- Input: JSON results from {session_count} session agents
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Aggregate all session data:
+   - Collect metadata from all sessions
+   - Merge lessons by category
+   - Group conflicts by type
+   - Sort sessions by date
+
+2. Use Gemini for final aggregation:
+   ccw cli -p "
+   PURPOSE: Aggregate lessons and conflicts from all workflow sessions
+   TASK:
+   • Group successes by functional domain
+   • Categorize challenges by severity (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
+   • Identify recurring conflict patterns
+   • Calculate frequencies and prioritize
+   MODE: analysis
+   CONTEXT: [Provide aggregated JSON data]
+   EXPECTED: Final aggregated structure for SKILL documents
+   RULES: Template reference from skill-aggregation.txt
+   " --tool gemini --mode analysis
+
+3. Read templates for formatting (same 4 templates as single mode)
+
+4. Generate all SKILL documents:
+   - sessions-timeline.md (all sessions, sorted by date)
+   - lessons-learned.md (aggregated lessons with frequencies)
+   - conflict-patterns.md (recurring patterns with resolutions)
+   - SKILL.md (index with progressive loading)
+
+5. Write files to .claude/skills/workflow-progress/
+
+6. Return result JSON:
+   {
+     "status": "success",
+     "sessions_processed": count,
+     "files_generated": ["SKILL.md", "sessions-timeline.md", ...],
+     "summary": {
+       "total_sessions": count,
+       "functional_domains": [...],
+       "date_range": "...",
+       "lessons_count": count,
+       "conflicts_count": count
+     }
+   }
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Verification
+
+**Step 3.1: Check SKILL Package Files**
+```bash
+bash(ls -lh .claude/skills/workflow-progress/)
+```
+
+Verify all 4 files exist:
+- SKILL.md
+- sessions-timeline.md
+- lessons-learned.md
+- conflict-patterns.md
+
+**Step 3.2: TodoWrite Completion**
+
+Mark all tasks as completed.
+
+**Step 3.3: Display Summary**
+
+**Single Session Mode**:
+```
+Session {session_id} processed successfully
+
+Updated:
+- sessions-timeline.md
+- lessons-learned.md
+- conflict-patterns.md
+- SKILL.md
+
+SKILL Location: .claude/skills/workflow-progress/SKILL.md
+```
+
+**All Sessions Mode**:
+```
+All sessions processed in parallel
+
+Sessions: {count} total
+Functional Domains: {domain_list}
+Date Range: {earliest} - {latest}
+
+Generated:
+- sessions-timeline.md ({count} sessions)
+- lessons-learned.md ({lessons_count} lessons)
+- conflict-patterns.md ({conflicts_count} conflicts)
+- SKILL.md (4-level progressive loading)
+
+SKILL Location: .claude/skills/workflow-progress/SKILL.md
+
+Usage:
+- Level 0: Quick refresh (~2K tokens)
+- Level 1: Recent history (~8K tokens)
+- Level 2: Complete analysis (~25K tokens)
+- Level 3: Deep dive (~40K tokens)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Agent Guidelines
+
+### Agent Capabilities
+
+**universal-executor agents can**:
+- Read files from `.workflow/.archives/`
+- Execute bash commands
+- Call Gemini CLI for intelligent analysis
+- Read template files for formatting guidance
+- Write SKILL package files (single mode) or return JSON (parallel mode)
+- Return structured results
+
+### Gemini Usage Pattern
+
+**When to use Gemini**:
+- Aggregating lessons from multiple sources
+- Identifying recurring patterns
+- Classifying conflicts by type and severity
+- Extracting structured data from IMPL_PLAN
+
+**Fallback Strategy**: If Gemini fails or times out, use direct file parsing with structured extraction logic.
+
+---
+
+## Template System
+
+### Template Files
+
+All templates located in: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/`
+
+1. **skill-sessions-timeline.txt**: Format for sessions-timeline.md
+2. **skill-lessons-learned.txt**: Format for lessons-learned.md
+3. **skill-conflict-patterns.txt**: Format for conflict-patterns.md
+4. **skill-index.txt**: Format for SKILL.md index
+5. **skill-aggregation.txt**: Rules for Gemini aggregation (existing)
+
+### Template Usage in Agent
+
+**Agents read templates to understand**:
+- File structure and markdown format
+- Data sources (which files to read)
+- Update strategy (incremental vs full)
+- Formatting rules and conventions
+- Aggregation logic (for Gemini)
+
+**Templates are NOT shown in this command documentation** - agents read them directly as needed.
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Validation Errors
+- **No archives directory**: "Error: No workflow archives found at .workflow/.archives/"
+- **Invalid session ID format**: "Error: Invalid session ID format. Only WFS-* sessions are supported"
+- **Session not found**: "Error: Session {session_id} not found in archives"
+- **No WFS sessions in manifest**: "Error: No WFS-* workflow sessions found in manifest.json"
+
+### Agent Errors
+- If agent fails, report error message from agent result
+- If Gemini times out, agents use fallback direct parsing
+- If template read fails, agents use inline format
+
+### Recovery
+- Single session mode: Can be retried without affecting other sessions
+- All sessions mode: If one agent fails, others continue; retry failed sessions individually
+
+
+
+## Integration
+
+### Called by `/workflow:session:complete`
+
+Automatically invoked after session archival:
+```bash
+SlashCommand(command="/memory:workflow-skill-memory session {session_id}")
+```
+
+### Manual Invocation
+
+Users can manually process sessions:
+```bash
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory session WFS-custom-feature  # Single session
+/memory:workflow-skill-memory all                         # Full regeneration
+```

.claude/commands/task/breakdown.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: breakdown
-description: Intelligent task decomposition with context-aware subtask generation
-usage: /task:breakdown <task-id>
-argument-hint: task-id
-examples:
-  - /task:breakdown IMPL-1
-  - /task:breakdown IMPL-1.1
-  - /task:breakdown impl-3
+description: Decompose complex task into subtasks with dependency mapping, creates child task JSONs with parent references and execution order
+argument-hint: "task-id"
 ---
 
 # Task Breakdown Command (/task:breakdown)
@@ -15,13 +10,12 @@ examples:
 Breaks down complex tasks into executable subtasks with context inheritance and agent assignment.
 
 ## Core Principles
-**Task System:** @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
 **File Cohesion:** Related files must stay in same task
 **10-Task Limit:** Total tasks cannot exceed 10 (triggers re-scoping)
 
 ## Core Features
 
-⚠️ **CRITICAL**: Manual breakdown with safety controls to prevent file conflicts and task limit violations.
+**CRITICAL**: Manual breakdown with safety controls to prevent file conflicts and task limit violations.
 
 ### Breakdown Process
 1. **Session Check**: Verify active session contains parent task
@@ -56,7 +50,7 @@ Interactive process:
 Task: Build authentication module
 Current total tasks: 6/10
 
-⚠️  MANUAL BREAKDOWN REQUIRED
+MANUAL BREAKDOWN REQUIRED
 Define subtasks manually (remaining capacity: 4 tasks):
 
 1. Enter subtask title: User authentication core
@@ -65,20 +59,34 @@ Define subtasks manually (remaining capacity: 4 tasks):
 2. Enter subtask title: OAuth integration
    Focus files: services/OAuthService.js, routes/oauth.js
 
-⚠️  FILE CONFLICT DETECTED:
+FILE CONFLICT DETECTED:
    - routes/auth.js appears in multiple subtasks
    - Recommendation: Merge related authentication routes
 
-⚠️  SIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY WARNING:
+SIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY WARNING:
    - "User authentication" and "OAuth integration" both handle auth
    - Consider combining into single task
 
-Proceed with breakdown? (y/n): y
+# Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "File conflicts and/or similar functionality detected. How do you want to proceed?",
+    header: "Confirm",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Proceed with breakdown", description: "Accept the risks and create the subtasks as defined." },
+      { label: "Restart breakdown", description: "Discard current subtasks and start over." },
+      { label: "Cancel breakdown", description: "Abort the operation and leave the parent task as is." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
 
-✅ Task IMPL-1 broken down:
-▸ IMPL-1: Build authentication module (container)
-  ├── IMPL-1.1: User authentication core → @code-developer
-  └── IMPL-1.2: OAuth integration → @code-developer
+User selected: "Proceed with breakdown"
+
+Task IMPL-1 broken down:
+IMPL-1: Build authentication module (container)
+  ├── IMPL-1.1: User authentication core -> @code-developer
+  └── IMPL-1.2: OAuth integration -> @code-developer
 
 Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 ```
@@ -90,7 +98,7 @@ Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 - **Implementation** → `@code-developer`
 - **Testing** → `@code-developer` (type: "test-gen")
 - **Test Validation** → `@test-fix-agent` (type: "test-fix")
-- **Review** → `@general-purpose` (optional)
+- **Review** → `@universal-executor` (optional)
 
 ### Context Inheritance
 - Subtasks inherit parent requirements
@@ -129,7 +137,6 @@ Files updated: .task/IMPL-1.json + 2 subtask files + TODO_LIST.md
 
 ## Implementation Details
 
-See @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md for:
 - Complete task JSON schema
 - Implementation field structure
 - Context inheritance rules
@@ -160,45 +167,38 @@ See @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md for:
 ```bash
 /task:breakdown impl-1
 
-▸ impl-1: Build authentication (container)
-  ├── impl-1.1: Design schema → @planning-agent
-  ├── impl-1.2: Implement logic + tests → @code-developer
-  └── impl-1.3: Execute & fix tests → @test-fix-agent
+impl-1: Build authentication (container)
+  ├── impl-1.1: Design schema -> @planning-agent
+  ├── impl-1.2: Implement logic + tests -> @code-developer
+  └── impl-1.3: Execute & fix tests -> @test-fix-agent
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling
 
 ```bash
 # Task not found
-❌ Task IMPL-5 not found
+Task IMPL-5 not found
 
 # Already broken down
-⚠️ Task IMPL-1 already has subtasks
+Task IMPL-1 already has subtasks
 
 # Wrong status
-❌ Cannot breakdown completed task IMPL-2
+Cannot breakdown completed task IMPL-2
 
 # 10-task limit exceeded
-❌ Breakdown would exceed 10-task limit (current: 8, proposed: 4)
-   Suggestion: Re-scope project into smaller iterations
+Breakdown would exceed 10-task limit (current: 8, proposed: 4)
+Suggestion: Re-scope project into smaller iterations
 
 # File conflicts detected
-⚠️ File conflict: routes/auth.js appears in IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2
-   Recommendation: Merge subtasks or redistribute files
+File conflict: routes/auth.js appears in IMPL-1.1 and IMPL-1.2
+Recommendation: Merge subtasks or redistribute files
 
 # Similar functionality warning
-⚠️ Similar functions detected: "user login" and "authentication"
-   Consider consolidating related functionality
+Similar functions detected: "user login" and "authentication"
+Consider consolidating related functionality
 
 # Manual breakdown required
-❌ Automatic breakdown disabled. Use manual breakdown process.
+Automatic breakdown disabled. Use manual breakdown process.
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/task:create` - Create new tasks
-- `/task:execute` - Execute subtasks
-- `/workflow:status` - View task hierarchy
-- `/workflow:plan` - Plan within 10-task limit
-
 **System ensures**: Manual breakdown control with file cohesion enforcement, similar functionality detection, and 10-task limit compliance

.claude/commands/task/create.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: create
-description: Create implementation tasks with automatic context awareness
-usage: /task:create "title"
-argument-hint: "task title"
-examples:
-  - /task:create "Implement user authentication"
-  - /task:create "Build REST API endpoints"
-  - /task:create "Fix login validation bug"
+description: Generate task JSON from natural language description with automatic file pattern detection, scope inference, and dependency analysis
+argument-hint: "\"task title\""
 ---
 
 # Task Create Command (/task:create)
@@ -42,7 +37,7 @@ Creates new implementation tasks with automatic context awareness and ID generat
 
 Output:
 ```
-✅ Task created: IMPL-1
+Task created: IMPL-1
 Title: Build authentication module
 Type: feature
 Agent: code-developer
@@ -78,7 +73,7 @@ Status: pending
 ### Analysis Triggers
 When implementation details incomplete:
 ```bash
-⚠️ Task requires analysis for implementation details
+Task requires analysis for implementation details
 Suggest running: gemini analysis for file locations and dependencies
 ```
 
@@ -109,7 +104,7 @@ Based on task type and title keywords:
 - **Design/Plan** → @planning-agent
 - **Test Generation** → @code-developer (type: "test-gen")
 - **Test Execution/Fix** → @test-fix-agent (type: "test-fix")
-- **Review/Audit** → @general-purpose (optional, only when explicitly requested)
+- **Review/Audit** → @universal-executor (optional, only when explicitly requested)
 
 ## Validation Rules
 
@@ -122,16 +117,16 @@ Based on task type and title keywords:
 
 ```bash
 # No workflow session
-❌ No active workflow found
-→ Use: /workflow init "project name"
+No active workflow found
+Use: /workflow init "project name"
 
 # Duplicate task
-⚠️ Similar task exists: IMPL-3
-→ Continue anyway? (y/n)
+Similar task exists: IMPL-3
+Continue anyway? (y/n)
 
 # Max depth exceeded
-❌ Cannot create IMPL-1.2.1 (max 2 levels)
-→ Use: IMPL-2 for new main task
+Cannot create IMPL-1.2.1 (max 2 levels)
+Use: IMPL-2 for new main task
 ```
 
 ## Examples
@@ -140,7 +135,7 @@ Based on task type and title keywords:
 ```bash
 /task:create "Implement user authentication"
 
-✅ Created IMPL-1: Implement user authentication
+Created IMPL-1: Implement user authentication
 Type: feature
 Agent: code-developer
 Status: pending
@@ -150,14 +145,8 @@ Status: pending
 ```bash
 /task:create "Fix login validation bug" --type=bugfix
 
-✅ Created IMPL-2: Fix login validation bug
+Created IMPL-2: Fix login validation bug
 Type: bugfix
 Agent: code-developer
 Status: pending
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/task:breakdown` - Break into subtasks
-- `/task:execute` - Execute with agent
-- `/context` - View task details
+```

.claude/commands/task/execute.md

@@ -1,20 +1,15 @@
 ---
 name: execute
-description: Execute tasks with appropriate agents and context-aware orchestration
-usage: /task:execute <task-id>
-argument-hint: task-id
-examples:
-  - /task:execute IMPL-1
-  - /task:execute IMPL-1.2
-  - /task:execute IMPL-3
+description: Execute task JSON using appropriate agent (@doc-generator/@implementation-agent/@test-agent) with pre-analysis context loading and status tracking
+argument-hint: "task-id"
 ---
 
-### 🚀 **Command Overview: `/task:execute`**
+## Command Overview: /task:execute
 
--   **Purpose**: Executes tasks using intelligent agent selection, context preparation, and progress tracking.
--   **Core Principles**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
+**Purpose**: Executes tasks using intelligent agent selection, context preparation, and progress tracking.
 
-### ⚙️ **Execution Modes**
+
+## Execution Modes
 
 -   **auto (Default)**
     -   Fully autonomous execution with automatic agent selection.
@@ -24,10 +19,10 @@ examples:
     -   Executes step-by-step, requiring user confirmation at each checkpoint.
     -   Allows for dynamic adjustments and manual review during the process.
 -   **review**
-    -   Optional manual review using `@general-purpose`.
+    -   Optional manual review using `@universal-executor`.
     -   Used only when explicitly requested by user.
 
-### 🤖 **Agent Selection Logic**
+## Agent Selection Logic
 
 The system determines the appropriate agent for a task using the following logic.
 
@@ -50,18 +45,18 @@ FUNCTION select_agent(task, agent_override):
             WHEN CONTAINS "Execute tests", "Fix tests", "Validate":
                 RETURN "@test-fix-agent" // type: test-fix
             WHEN CONTAINS "Review code":
-                RETURN "@general-purpose" // Optional manual review
+                RETURN "@universal-executor" // Optional manual review
             DEFAULT:
                 RETURN "@code-developer" // Default agent
         END CASE
 END FUNCTION
 ```
 
-### 🔄 **Core Execution Protocol**
+## Core Execution Protocol
 
-`Pre-Execution` **->** `Execution` **->** `Post-Execution`
+`Pre-Execution` -> `Execution` -> `Post-Execution`
 
-### ✅ **Pre-Execution Protocol**
+### Pre-Execution Protocol
 
 `Validate Task & Dependencies` **->** `Prepare Execution Context` **->** `Coordinate with TodoWrite`
 
@@ -70,7 +65,7 @@ END FUNCTION
 -   **Session Context Injection**: Provides workflow directory paths to agents for TODO_LIST.md and summary management.
 -   **TodoWrite Coordination**: Generates execution Todos and checkpoints, syncing with `TODO_LIST.md`.
 
-### 🏁 **Post-Execution Protocol**
+### Post-Execution Protocol
 
 `Update Task Status` **->** `Generate Summary` **->** `Save Artifacts` **->** `Sync All Progress` **->** `Validate File Integrity`
 
@@ -78,7 +73,7 @@ END FUNCTION
 -   Creates a summary in `.summaries/`.
 -   Stores outputs and syncs progress across the entire workflow session.
 
-### 🧠 **Task & Subtask Execution Logic**
+### Task & Subtask Execution Logic
 
 This logic defines how single, multiple, or parent tasks are handled.
 
@@ -104,7 +99,7 @@ FUNCTION execute_task_command(task_id, mode, parallel_flag):
 END FUNCTION
 ```
 
-### 🛡️ **Error Handling & Recovery Logic**
+### Error Handling & Recovery Logic
 
 ```pseudo
 FUNCTION pre_execution_check(task):
@@ -129,7 +124,7 @@ END FUNCTION
 ```
 
 
-### 📄 **Simplified Context Structure (JSON)**
+### Simplified Context Structure (JSON)
 
 This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task execution.
 
@@ -194,7 +189,7 @@ This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task executi
       "pre_analysis": [
         {
           "action": "analyze patterns",
-          "template": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt",
+          "template": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt",
           "method": "gemini"
         }
       ]
@@ -204,10 +199,10 @@ This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task executi
     "session": "WFS-user-auth",
     "phase": "IMPLEMENT",
     "session_context": {
-      "workflow_directory": ".workflow/WFS-user-auth/",
-      "todo_list_location": ".workflow/WFS-user-auth/TODO_LIST.md",
-      "summaries_directory": ".workflow/WFS-user-auth/.summaries/",
-      "task_json_location": ".workflow/WFS-user-auth/.task/"
+      "workflow_directory": ".workflow/active/WFS-user-auth/",
+      "todo_list_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-user-auth/TODO_LIST.md",
+      "summaries_directory": ".workflow/active/WFS-user-auth/.summaries/",
+      "task_json_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-user-auth/.task/"
     }
   },
   "execution": {
@@ -218,7 +213,7 @@ This is the simplified data structure loaded to provide context for task executi
 }
 ```
 
-### 🎯 **Agent-Specific Context**
+### Agent-Specific Context
 
 Different agents receive context tailored to their function, including implementation details:
 
@@ -241,20 +236,20 @@ Different agents receive context tailored to their function, including implement
 - Error conditions to validate from implementation.context_notes.error_handling
 - Performance requirements from implementation.context_notes.performance_considerations
 
-**`@general-purpose`**:
+**`@universal-executor`**:
 - Used for optional manual reviews when explicitly requested
 - Code quality standards and implementation patterns
 - Security considerations from implementation.context_notes.risks
 - Dependency validation from implementation.context_notes.dependencies
 - Architecture compliance checks
 
-### 🗃️ **Simplified File Output**
+### Simplified File Output
 
 -   **Task JSON File (`.task/<task-id>.json`)**: Updated with status and last attempt time only.
 -   **Session File (`workflow-session.json`)**: Updated task stats (completed count).
 -   **Summary File**: Generated in `.summaries/` upon completion (optional).
 
-### 📝 **Simplified Summary Template**
+### Simplified Summary Template
 
 Optional summary file generated at `.summaries/IMPL-[task-id]-summary.md`.
 

.claude/commands/task/replan.md

@@ -1,68 +1,100 @@
 ---
 name: replan
-description: Replan individual tasks with detailed user input and change tracking
-usage: /task:replan <task-id> [input]
-argument-hint: task-id ["text"|file.md|ISS-001]
-examples:
-  - /task:replan IMPL-1 "Add OAuth2 authentication support"
-  - /task:replan IMPL-1 updated-specs.md
-  - /task:replan IMPL-1 ISS-001
+description: Update task JSON with new requirements or batch-update multiple tasks from verification report, tracks changes in task-changes.json
+argument-hint: "task-id [\"text\"|file.md] | --batch [verification-report.md]"
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 # Task Replan Command (/task:replan)
 
-## Overview
-Replans individual tasks with multiple input options, change tracking, and version management.
+> **⚠️ DEPRECATION NOTICE**: This command is maintained for backward compatibility. For new workflows, use `/workflow:replan` which provides:
+> - Session-level replanning with comprehensive artifact updates
+> - Interactive boundary clarification
+> - Updates to IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md, and session metadata
+> - Better integration with workflow sessions
+>
+> **Migration**: Replace `/task:replan IMPL-1 "changes"` with `/workflow:replan IMPL-1 "changes"`
 
-## Core Principles
-**Task System:** @~/.claude/workflows/task-core.md
+## Overview
+Replans individual tasks or batch processes multiple tasks with change tracking and backup management.
+
+**Modes**:
+- **Single Task Mode**: Replan one task with specific changes
+- **Batch Mode**: Process multiple tasks from action-plan verification report
 
 ## Key Features
-- **Single-Task Focus**: Operates on individual tasks only
-- **Multiple Input Sources**: Text, files, or issue references
-- **Version Tracking**: Backup previous versions
+- **Single/Batch Operations**: Single task or multiple tasks from verification report
+- **Multiple Input Sources**: Text, files, or verification report
+- **Backup Management**: Automatic backup of previous versions
 - **Change Documentation**: Track all modifications
+- **Progress Tracking**: TodoWrite integration for batch operations
 
-⚠️ **CRITICAL**: Validates active session before replanning
+**CRITICAL**: Validates active session before replanning
 
-## Input Sources
+## Operation Modes
 
-### Direct Text (Default)
+### Single Task Mode
+
+#### Direct Text (Default)
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 "Add OAuth2 authentication support"
 ```
 
-### File-based Input
+#### File-based Input
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 updated-specs.md
 ```
 Supports: .md, .txt, .json, .yaml
 
-### Issue Reference
-```bash
-/task:replan IMPL-1 ISS-001
-```
-Loads issue description and requirements
-
-### Interactive Mode
+#### Interactive Mode
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 --interactive
 ```
 Guided step-by-step modification process with validation
 
+### Batch Mode
+
+#### From Verification Report
+```bash
+/task:replan --batch ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
+```
+
+**Workflow**:
+1. Parse verification report to extract replan recommendations
+2. Create TodoWrite task list for all modifications
+3. Process each task sequentially with confirmation
+4. Track progress and generate summary report
+
+**Auto-detection**: If input file contains "Action Plan Verification Report" header, automatically enters batch mode
+
 ## Replanning Process
 
+### Single Task Process
+
 1. **Load & Validate**: Read task JSON and validate session
 2. **Parse Input**: Process changes from input source
-3. **Backup Version**: Create previous version backup
+3. **Create Backup**: Save previous version to backup folder
 4. **Update Task**: Modify JSON structure and relationships
 5. **Save Changes**: Write updated task and increment version
 6. **Update Session**: Reflect changes in workflow stats
 
-## Version Management
+### Batch Process
 
-### Version Tracking
-Tasks maintain version history:
+1. **Parse Verification Report**: Extract all replan recommendations
+2. **Initialize TodoWrite**: Create task list for tracking
+3. **For Each Task**:
+   - Mark todo as in_progress
+   - Load and validate task JSON
+   - Create backup
+   - Apply recommended changes
+   - Save updated task
+   - Mark todo as completed
+4. **Generate Summary**: Report all changes and backup locations
+
+## Backup Management
+
+### Backup Tracking
+Tasks maintain backup history:
 ```json
 {
   "id": "IMPL-1",
@@ -72,7 +104,8 @@ Tasks maintain version history:
       "version": "1.2",
       "reason": "Add OAuth2 support",
       "input_source": "direct_text",
-      "backup_location": ".task/versions/IMPL-1-v1.1.json"
+      "backup_location": ".task/backup/IMPL-1-v1.1.json",
+      "timestamp": "2025-10-17T10:30:00Z"
     }
   ]
 }
@@ -84,11 +117,15 @@ Tasks maintain version history:
 ```
 .task/
 ├── IMPL-1.json                    # Current version
-├── versions/
-│   └── IMPL-1-v1.1.json          # Previous backup
+├── backup/
+│   ├── IMPL-1-v1.0.json          # Original version
+│   ├── IMPL-1-v1.1.json          # Previous backup
+│   └── IMPL-1-v1.2.json          # Latest backup
 └── [new subtasks as needed]
 ```
 
+**Backup Naming**: `{task-id}-v{version}.json`
+
 ## Implementation Updates
 
 ### Change Detection
@@ -138,18 +175,68 @@ Updates workflow-session.json with:
 /task:replan IMPL-1 --rollback v1.1
 
 Rollback to version 1.1:
-- Restore task from backup
+- Restore task from backup/.../IMPL-1-v1.1.json
 - Remove new subtasks if any
 - Update session stats
 
-Confirm rollback? (y/n): y
+# Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Are you sure you want to roll back this task to a previous version?",
+    header: "Confirm",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Yes, rollback", description: "Restore the task from the selected backup." },
+      { label: "No, cancel", description: "Keep the current version of the task." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
 
-✅ Task rolled back to version 1.1
+User selected: "Yes, rollback"
+
+Task rolled back to version 1.1
+```
+
+## Batch Processing with TodoWrite
+
+### Progress Tracking
+When processing multiple tasks, automatically creates TodoWrite task list:
+
+```markdown
+**Batch Replan Progress**:
+- [x] IMPL-002: Add FR-12 draft saving acceptance criteria
+- [x] IMPL-003: Add FR-14 history tracking acceptance criteria
+- [ ] IMPL-004: Add FR-09 response surface explicit coverage
+- [ ] IMPL-008: Add NFR performance validation steps
+```
+
+### Batch Report
+After completion, generates summary:
+```markdown
+## Batch Replan Summary
+
+**Total Tasks**: 4
+**Successful**: 3
+**Failed**: 1
+**Skipped**: 0
+
+### Changes Made
+- IMPL-002 v1.0 → v1.1: Added FR-12 acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-003 v1.0 → v1.1: Added FR-14 acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-004 v1.0 → v1.1: Added FR-09 explicit coverage
+
+### Backups Created
+- .task/backup/IMPL-002-v1.0.json
+- .task/backup/IMPL-003-v1.0.json
+- .task/backup/IMPL-004-v1.0.json
+
+### Errors
+- IMPL-008: File not found (task may have been renamed)
 ```
 
 ## Examples
 
-### Text Input
+### Single Task - Text Input
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-1 "Add OAuth2 authentication support"
 
@@ -158,47 +245,193 @@ Proposed updates:
 + Add OAuth2 integration
 + Update authentication flow
 
-Apply changes? (y/n): y
+# Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Do you want to apply these changes to the task?",
+    header: "Apply",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Yes, apply", description: "Create new version with these changes." },
+      { label: "No, cancel", description: "Discard changes and keep current version." }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
 
-✓ Version 1.2 created
-✓ Context updated
-✓ Backup saved
+User selected: "Yes, apply"
+
+Version 1.2 created
+Context updated
+Backup saved to .task/backup/IMPL-1-v1.1.json
 ```
 
-### File Input
+### Single Task - File Input
 ```bash
 /task:replan IMPL-2 requirements.md
 
 Loading requirements.md...
 Applying specification changes...
 
-✓ Task updated with new requirements
-✓ Version 1.1 created
+Task updated with new requirements
+Version 1.1 created
+Backup saved to .task/backup/IMPL-2-v1.0.json
+```
+
+### Batch Mode - From Verification Report
+```bash
+/task:replan --batch .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
+
+Parsing verification report...
+Found 4 tasks requiring replanning:
+- IMPL-002: Add FR-12 draft saving acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-003: Add FR-14 history tracking acceptance criteria
+- IMPL-004: Add FR-09 response surface explicit coverage
+- IMPL-008: Add NFR performance validation steps
+
+Creating task tracking list...
+
+Processing IMPL-002...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-002-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Processing IMPL-003...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-003-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Processing IMPL-004...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-004-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Processing IMPL-008...
+Backup created: .task/backup/IMPL-008-v1.0.json
+Updated to v1.1
+
+Batch replan completed: 4/4 successful
+Summary report saved
+```
+
+### Batch Mode - Auto-detection
+```bash
+# If file contains "Action Plan Verification Report", auto-enters batch mode
+/task:replan ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
+
+Detected verification report format
+Entering batch mode...
+[same as above]
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling
 
+### Single Task Errors
 ```bash
 # Task not found
-❌ Task IMPL-5 not found
-→ Check task ID with /context
+Task IMPL-5 not found
+Check task ID with /workflow:status
 
 # Task completed
-⚠️ Task IMPL-1 is completed (cannot replan)
-→ Create new task for additional work
+Task IMPL-1 is completed (cannot replan)
+Create new task for additional work
 
 # File not found
-❌ File requirements.md not found
-→ Check file path
+File requirements.md not found
+Check file path
 
 # No input provided
-❌ Please specify changes needed
-→ Provide text, file, or issue reference
+Please specify changes needed
+Provide text, file, or verification report
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
+### Batch Mode Errors
+```bash
+# Invalid verification report
+File does not contain valid verification report format
+Check report structure or use single task mode
 
-- `/context` - View updated task structure
-- `/task:execute` - Execute replanned task
-- `/task:create` - Create new tasks
-- `/workflow:action-plan` - For workflow-wide changes
+# Partial failures
+Batch completed with errors: 3/4 successful
+Review error details in summary report
+
+# No replan recommendations found
+Verification report contains no replan recommendations
+Check report content or use /workflow:action-plan-verify first
+```
+
+## Batch Mode Integration
+
+### Input Format Expectations
+Batch mode parses verification reports looking for:
+
+1. **Required Actions Section**: Commands like `/task:replan IMPL-X "changes"`
+2. **Findings Table**: Task IDs with recommendations
+3. **Next Actions Section**: Specific replan commands
+
+**Example Patterns**:
+```markdown
+#### 1. HIGH Priority - Address FR Coverage Gaps
+/task:replan IMPL-004 "
+Add explicit acceptance criteria:
+- FR-09: Response surface 3D visualization
+"
+
+#### 2. MEDIUM Priority - Enhance NFR Coverage
+/task:replan IMPL-008 "
+Add performance testing:
+- NFR-01: Load test API endpoints
+"
+```
+
+### Extraction Logic
+1. Scan for `/task:replan` commands in report
+2. Extract task ID and change description
+3. Group by priority (HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)
+4. Process in priority order with TodoWrite tracking
+
+### Confirmation Behavior
+- **Default**: Confirm each task before applying
+- **With `--auto-confirm`**: Apply all changes without prompting
+  ```bash
+  /task:replan --batch report.md --auto-confirm
+  ```
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Backup Management
+```typescript
+// Backup file naming convention
+const backupPath = `.task/backup/${taskId}-v${previousVersion}.json`;
+
+// Backup metadata in task JSON
+{
+  "replan_history": [
+    {
+      "version": "1.2",
+      "timestamp": "2025-10-17T10:30:00Z",
+      "reason": "Add FR-09 explicit coverage",
+      "input_source": "batch_verification_report",
+      "backup_location": ".task/backup/IMPL-004-v1.1.json"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### TodoWrite Integration
+```typescript
+// Initialize tracking for batch mode
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: taskList.map(task => ({
+    content: `${task.id}: ${task.changeDescription}`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Replanning ${task.id}`
+  }))
+});
+
+// Update progress during processing
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: updateTaskStatus(taskId, "in_progress")
+});
+
+// Mark completed
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: updateTaskStatus(taskId, "completed")
+});
+```

.claude/commands/update-memory-full.md

@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update-memory-full
-description: Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-usage: /update-memory-full [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
-argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
-examples:
-  - /update-memory-full                      # Full project documentation update (gemini default)
-  - /update-memory-full --tool qwen          # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
-  - /update-memory-full --tool codex         # Use Codex for implementation validation
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-full`
-
-Complete project-wide documentation update using depth-parallel execution.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
-- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
-- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/bash
-# Complete project-wide CLAUDE.md documentation update
-
-# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-tool="gemini"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
-
-# Step 2: Code Index architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern="**/*.{md,json,yaml,yml}")
-
-# Step 3: Cache git changes
-Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
-
-# Step 4: Get and display project structure
-modules=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list))
-count=$(echo "$modules" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 5: Analysis handover → Model takes control
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-
-# Pseudocode flow:
-# IF (module_count > 20 OR complex_project_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project full update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-# ELSE:
-#     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
-#
-# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After the bash script completes the initial analysis, the model takes control to:
-
-1. **Analyze Complexity**: Review module count and project context
-2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**:
-   - Simple projects: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex projects: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
-4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
-
-### 📋 Execution Strategies
-
-**For Simple Projects (≤20 modules):**
-
-Model will present detailed plan:
-```
-📋 Update Plan:
-  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
-
-  NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
-    - ./src/components/CLAUDE.md
-    - ./src/services/CLAUDE.md
-
-  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
-    - ./CLAUDE.md
-    - ./src/CLAUDE.md
-    - ./tests/CLAUDE.md
-
-  Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed
-
-  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
-```
-
-```pseudo
-# ⚠️ MANDATORY: User confirmation → MUST await explicit approval  
-IF user_explicitly_confirms():
-    continue_execution()
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-
-# Step 4: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(modules)
-
-# Step 5: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "full" "$tool" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-# Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
-non_claude=$(Bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || true))
-if [ -n "$non_claude" ]; then
-    Bash(git restore --staged .)
-    echo "⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified, staging reverted"
-    echo "Modified files: $non_claude"
-else
-    echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified, staging preserved"
-fi
-
-# Step 7: Display changes → Final status
-Bash(git status --short)
-```
-
-**For Complex Projects (>20 modules):**
-
-The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
-
-```javascript
-Task "Complex project full update"
-subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-prompt: `
-CONTEXT:
-- Total modules: ${module_count}
-- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
-- Mode: full
-- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
-- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
-
-MODULE LIST:
-${modules_output}  // Full output from get_modules_by_depth.sh list
-
-REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
-2. Process depths 5→0 sequentially, max 4 parallel jobs per depth
-3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "full" "${tool}" &
-4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
-5. Verify all ${module_count} modules are processed
-6. Run safety check after completion
-7. Display git status
-
-Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules.
-`
-```
-
-**Agent receives complete context:**
-- Module count and tool selection
-- Full structured module list
-- Clear execution requirements
-- Path extraction format
-- Success criteria
-
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Complete project documentation refresh
-/update-memory-full
-
-# After major architectural changes
-/update-memory-full
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Separated Commands**: Each bash operation is a discrete, trackable step
-- **Intelligent Complexity Detection**: Model analyzes project context for optimal strategy
-- **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Same depth modules run in parallel, depths run sequentially
-- **Git Integration**: Auto-cache changes before, safety check and show status after
-- **Safety Protection**: Automatic detection and revert of unintended source code modifications
-- **Module Detection**: Uses get_modules_by_depth.sh for structure discovery
-- **User Confirmation**: Clear plan presentation with approval step
-- **CLAUDE.md Only**: Only updates documentation, never source code

.claude/commands/update-memory-related.md

@@ -1,187 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update-memory-related
-description: Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation updates based on recent changes
-usage: /update-memory-related [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>]
-argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen|codex]"
-examples:
-  - /update-memory-related                    # Update documentation based on recent changes (gemini default)
-  - /update-memory-related --tool qwen        # Use Qwen for architecture analysis
-  - /update-memory-related --tool codex       # Use Codex for implementation validation
----
-
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/update-memory-related`
-
-Context-aware documentation update for modules affected by recent changes.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **Gemini (default)**: Documentation generation, pattern recognition, architecture review
-- **Qwen**: Architecture analysis, system design documentation
-- **Codex**: Implementation validation, code quality analysis
-
-
-### 📝 Execution Template
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/bash
-# Context-aware CLAUDE.md documentation update
-
-# Step 1: Parse tool selection (default: gemini)
-tool="gemini"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool qwen"* ]] && tool="qwen"
-[[ "$*" == *"--tool codex"* ]] && tool="codex"
-
-# Step 2: Code Index refresh and architecture analysis
-mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="class|function|interface", file_pattern="**/*.{ts,js,py}")
-
-# Step 3: Detect changed modules (before staging)
-changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list))
-
-# Step 4: Cache git changes (protect current state)
-Bash(git add -A 2>/dev/null || true)
-
-# Step 5: Use detected changes or fallback
-if [ -z "$changed" ]; then
-    changed=$(Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | head -10))
-fi
-count=$(echo "$changed" | wc -l)
-
-# Step 6: Analysis handover → Model takes control
-# BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
-
-# Pseudocode flow:
-# IF (change_count > 15 OR complex_changes_detected):
-#     → Task "Complex project related update" subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-# ELSE:
-#     → Present plan and WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL before execution
-#
-# Pass tool parameter to update_module_claude.sh: "$tool"
-```
-
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
-
-After the bash script completes change detection, the model takes control to:
-
-1. **Analyze Changes**: Review change count and complexity  
-2. **Parse CLAUDE.md Status**: Extract which changed modules have/need CLAUDE.md files
-3. **Choose Strategy**: 
-   - Simple changes: Present execution plan with CLAUDE.md paths to user
-   - Complex changes: Delegate to memory-bridge agent
-4. **Present Detailed Plan**: Show user exactly which CLAUDE.md files will be created/updated for changed modules
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: WAIT FOR USER APPROVAL**: No execution without explicit user consent
-
-### 📋 Execution Strategies
-
-**For Simple Changes (≤15 modules):**
-
-Model will present detailed plan for affected modules:
-```
-📋 Related Update Plan:
-  Tool: [gemini|qwen|codex] (from --tool parameter)
-
-  CHANGED modules affecting CLAUDE.md:
-
-  NEW CLAUDE.md files (X):
-    - ./src/api/auth/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-    - ./src/utils/helpers/CLAUDE.md  [new module]
-
-  UPDATE existing CLAUDE.md files (Y):
-    - ./src/api/CLAUDE.md  [parent of changed auth/]
-    - ./src/CLAUDE.md  [root level]
-
-  Total: N CLAUDE.md files will be processed for recent changes
-
-  ⚠️ Confirm execution? (y/n)
-```
-
-```pseudo
-# ⚠️ MANDATORY: User confirmation → MUST await explicit approval
-IF user_explicitly_confirms():
-    continue_execution()
-ELSE:
-    abort_execution()
-
-# Step 4: Organize modules by depth → Prepare execution
-depth_modules = organize_by_depth(changed_modules)
-
-# Step 5: Execute depth-parallel updates → Process by depth
-FOR depth FROM max_depth DOWN TO 0:
-    FOR each module IN depth_modules[depth]:
-        WHILE active_jobs >= 4: wait(0.1)
-        Bash(~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "$module" "related" "$tool" &)
-    wait_all_jobs()
-
-# Step 6: Safety check and restore staging state
-non_claude=$(Bash(git diff --cached --name-only | grep -v "CLAUDE.md" || true))
-if [ -n "$non_claude" ]; then
-    Bash(git restore --staged .)
-    echo "⚠️ Warning: Non-CLAUDE.md files were modified, staging reverted"
-    echo "Modified files: $non_claude"
-else
-    echo "✅ Only CLAUDE.md files modified, staging preserved"
-fi
-
-# Step 7: Display changes → Final status
-Bash(git diff --stat)
-```
-
-**For Complex Changes (>15 modules):**
-
-The model will delegate to the memory-bridge agent with structured context:
-
-```javascript
-Task "Complex project related update"
-subagent_type: "memory-bridge"
-prompt: `
-CONTEXT:
-- Total modules: ${change_count}
-- Tool: ${tool}  // from --tool parameter, default: gemini
-- Mode: related
-- Changed modules detected via: detect_changed_modules.sh
-- Existing CLAUDE.md: ${existing_count}
-- New CLAUDE.md needed: ${new_count}
-
-MODULE LIST:
-${changed_modules_output}  // Full output from detect_changed_modules.sh list
-
-REQUIREMENTS:
-1. Use TodoWrite to track each depth level before execution
-2. Process depths sequentially (deepest→shallowest), max 4 parallel jobs per depth
-3. Command format: update_module_claude.sh "<path>" "related" "${tool}" &
-4. Extract exact path from "depth:N|path:<PATH>|..." format
-5. Verify all ${change_count} modules are processed
-6. Run safety check after completion
-7. Display git diff --stat
-
-Execute depth-parallel updates for changed modules only.
-`
-```
-
-**Agent receives complete context:**
-- Changed module count and tool selection
-- Full structured module list (changed only)
-- Clear execution requirements with "related" mode
-- Path extraction format
-- Success criteria
-
-
-### 📚 Usage Examples
-
-```bash
-# Daily development update
-/update-memory-related
-
-# After feature work
-/update-memory-related
-```
-
-### ✨ Features
-
-- **Separated Commands**: Each bash operation is a discrete, trackable step
-- **Intelligent Change Analysis**: Model analyzes change complexity for optimal strategy
-- **Change Detection**: Automatically finds affected modules using git diff
-- **Depth-Parallel Execution**: Same depth modules run in parallel, depths run sequentially  
-- **Git Integration**: Auto-cache changes, show diff statistics after
-- **Fallback Mode**: Updates recent files when no git changes found
-- **User Confirmation**: Clear plan presentation with approval step
-- **CLAUDE.md Only**: Only updates documentation, never source code

.claude/commands/version.md

@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: version
-description: Display version information and check for updates
-usage: /version
-examples:
-  - /version
+description: Display Claude Code version information and check for updates
 allowed-tools: Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -155,12 +152,12 @@ bash(printf "%s\n%s" "3.2.1" "3.2.2" | sort -V | tail -n 1)
 
 **Scenario 1: Up to date**
 ```
-✅ You are on the latest stable version (3.2.1)
+You are on the latest stable version (3.2.1)
 ```
 
 **Scenario 2: Upgrade available**
 ```
-⬆️ A newer stable version is available: v3.2.2
+A newer stable version is available: v3.2.2
 Your version: 3.2.1
 
 To upgrade:
@@ -170,7 +167,7 @@ Bash: bash <(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-W
 
 **Scenario 3: Development version**
 ```
-✨ You are running a development version (3.4.0-dev)
+You are running a development version (3.4.0-dev)
 This is newer than the latest stable release (v3.3.0)
 ```
 
@@ -255,7 +252,3 @@ ERROR: version.json is invalid or corrupted
 
 ### Timeout Configuration
 All network calls should use `timeout: 30000` (30 seconds) to handle slow connections.
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/cli:cli-init` - Initialize CLI configurations
-- `/workflow:session:list` - List workflow sessions

.claude/commands/workflow/action-plan-verify.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: action-plan-verify
-description: Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis of IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json before execution
-usage: /workflow:action-plan-verify [--session <session-id>]
-argument-hint: "optional: --session <session-id>"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:action-plan-verify
-  - /workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-auth
+description: Perform non-destructive cross-artifact consistency analysis between IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs with quality gate validation
+argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
 allowed-tools: Read(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -19,13 +15,13 @@ You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
 
 ## Goal
 
-Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items between action planning artifacts (`IMPL_PLAN.md`, `task.json`) and brainstorming artifacts (`synthesis-specification.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/workflow:plan` has successfully produced complete `IMPL_PLAN.md` and task JSON files.
+Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items between action planning artifacts (`IMPL_PLAN.md`, `task.json`) and brainstorming artifacts (`role analysis documents`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/workflow:plan` has successfully produced complete `IMPL_PLAN.md` and task JSON files.
 
 ## Operating Constraints
 
 **STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands).
 
-**Synthesis Authority**: The `synthesis-specification.md` is **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
+**Synthesis Authority**: The `role analysis documents` is **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
 
 ## Execution Steps
 
@@ -36,26 +32,32 @@ Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items be
 IF --session parameter provided:
     session_id = provided session
 ELSE:
-    CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
-    IF active_session EXISTS:
-        session_id = get_active_session()
-    ELSE:
+    # Auto-detect active session
+    active_sessions = bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
+    IF active_sessions is empty:
         ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id>"
         EXIT
+    ELSE IF active_sessions has multiple entries:
+        # Use most recently modified session
+        session_id = bash(ls -td .workflow/active/WFS-*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
+    ELSE:
+        session_id = basename(active_sessions[0])
 
 # Derive absolute paths
-session_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}
+session_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}
 brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
 task_dir = session_dir/.task
 
 # Validate required artifacts
-SYNTHESIS = brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
+# Note: "role analysis documents" refers to [role]/analysis.md files (e.g., product-manager/analysis.md)
+SYNTHESIS_DIR = brainstorm_dir  # Contains role analysis files: */analysis.md
 IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
 TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
 
 # Abort if missing
-IF NOT EXISTS(SYNTHESIS):
-    ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
+SYNTHESIS_FILES = Glob(brainstorm_dir/*/analysis.md)
+IF SYNTHESIS_FILES.count == 0:
+    ERROR: "No role analysis documents found in .brainstorming/*/analysis.md. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
     EXIT
 
 IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
@@ -71,7 +73,12 @@ IF TASK_FILES.count == 0:
 
 Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
 
-**From synthesis-specification.md**:
+**From workflow-session.json** (NEW - PRIMARY REFERENCE):
+- Original user prompt/intent (project or description field)
+- User's stated goals and objectives
+- User's scope definition
+
+**From role analysis documents**:
 - Functional Requirements (IDs, descriptions, acceptance criteria)
 - Non-Functional Requirements (IDs, targets)
 - Business Requirements (IDs, success metrics)
@@ -94,7 +101,7 @@ Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
 - Dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
 - Context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, artifacts)
 - Flow control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach)
-- Meta (complexity, priority, use_codex)
+- Meta (complexity, priority)
 
 ### 3. Build Semantic Models
 
@@ -121,33 +128,40 @@ Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
 
 Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
 
-#### A. Requirements Coverage Analysis
+#### A. User Intent Alignment (NEW - CRITICAL)
+
+- **Goal Alignment**: IMPL_PLAN objectives match user's original intent
+- **Scope Drift**: Plan covers user's stated scope without unauthorized expansion
+- **Success Criteria Match**: Plan's success criteria reflect user's expectations
+- **Intent Conflicts**: Tasks contradicting user's original objectives
+
+#### B. Requirements Coverage Analysis
 
 - **Orphaned Requirements**: Requirements in synthesis with zero associated tasks
 - **Unmapped Tasks**: Tasks with no clear requirement linkage
 - **NFR Coverage Gaps**: Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability) not reflected in tasks
 
-#### B. Consistency Validation
+#### C. Consistency Validation
 
 - **Requirement Conflicts**: Tasks contradicting synthesis requirements
 - **Architecture Drift**: IMPL_PLAN architecture not matching synthesis ADRs
 - **Terminology Drift**: Same concept named differently across IMPL_PLAN and tasks
 - **Data Model Inconsistency**: Tasks referencing entities/fields not in synthesis data model
 
-#### C. Dependency Integrity
+#### D. Dependency Integrity
 
 - **Circular Dependencies**: Task A depends on B, B depends on C, C depends on A
 - **Missing Dependencies**: Task requires outputs from another task but no explicit dependency
 - **Broken Dependencies**: Task depends on non-existent task ID
 - **Logical Ordering Issues**: Implementation tasks before foundational setup without dependency note
 
-#### D. Synthesis Alignment
+#### E. Synthesis Alignment
 
 - **Priority Conflicts**: High-priority synthesis requirements mapped to low-priority tasks
 - **Success Criteria Mismatch**: IMPL_PLAN success criteria not covering synthesis acceptance criteria
 - **Risk Mitigation Gaps**: Critical risks in synthesis without corresponding mitigation tasks
 
-#### E. Task Specification Quality
+#### F. Task Specification Quality
 
 - **Ambiguous Focus Paths**: Tasks with vague or missing focus_paths
 - **Underspecified Acceptance**: Tasks without clear acceptance criteria
@@ -155,12 +169,12 @@ Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder i
 - **Weak Flow Control**: Tasks without clear implementation_approach or pre_analysis steps
 - **Missing Target Files**: Tasks without flow_control.target_files specification
 
-#### F. Duplication Detection
+#### G. Duplication Detection
 
 - **Overlapping Task Scope**: Multiple tasks with nearly identical descriptions
 - **Redundant Requirements Coverage**: Same requirement covered by multiple tasks without clear partitioning
 
-#### G. Feasibility Assessment
+#### H. Feasibility Assessment
 
 - **Complexity Misalignment**: Task marked "simple" but requires multiple file modifications
 - **Resource Conflicts**: Parallel tasks requiring same resources/files
@@ -171,6 +185,7 @@ Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder i
 Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
 
 - **CRITICAL**:
+  - Violates user's original intent (goal misalignment, scope drift)
   - Violates synthesis authority (requirement conflict)
   - Core requirement with zero coverage
   - Circular dependencies
@@ -194,21 +209,27 @@ Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
 
 ### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
 
-Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
+**Report Generation**: Generate report content and save to file.
+
+Output a Markdown report with the following structure:
 
 ```markdown
 ## Action Plan Verification Report
 
 **Session**: WFS-{session-id}
 **Generated**: {timestamp}
-**Artifacts Analyzed**: synthesis-specification.md, IMPL_PLAN.md, {N} task files
+**Artifacts Analyzed**: role analysis documents, IMPL_PLAN.md, {N} task files
 
 ---
 
 ### Executive Summary
 
 - **Overall Risk Level**: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
-- **Recommendation**: BLOCK_EXECUTION | PROCEED_WITH_FIXES | PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION | PROCEED
+- **Recommendation**: (See decision matrix below)
+  - BLOCK_EXECUTION: Critical issues exist (must fix before proceeding)
+  - PROCEED_WITH_FIXES: High issues exist, no critical (fix recommended before execution)
+  - PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION: Medium issues only (proceed with awareness)
+  - PROCEED: Low issues only or no issues (safe to execute)
 - **Critical Issues**: {count}
 - **High Issues**: {count}
 - **Medium Issues**: {count}
@@ -233,10 +254,10 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 | Requirement ID | Requirement Summary | Has Task? | Task IDs | Priority Match | Notes |
 |----------------|---------------------|-----------|----------|----------------|-------|
-| FR-01 | User authentication | ✅ Yes | IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2 | ✅ Match | Complete |
-| FR-02 | Data export | ✅ Yes | IMPL-2.3 | ⚠️ Mismatch | High req → Med priority task |
-| FR-03 | Profile management | ❌ No | - | - | **CRITICAL: Zero coverage** |
-| NFR-01 | Response time <200ms | ❌ No | - | - | **HIGH: No performance tasks** |
+| FR-01 | User authentication | Yes | IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2 | Match | Complete |
+| FR-02 | Data export | Yes | IMPL-2.3 | Mismatch | High req → Med priority task |
+| FR-03 | Profile management | No | - | - | **CRITICAL: Zero coverage** |
+| NFR-01 | Response time <200ms | No | - | - | **HIGH: No performance tasks** |
 
 **Coverage Metrics**:
 - Functional Requirements: 85% (17/20 covered)
@@ -255,7 +276,7 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 ### Dependency Graph Issues
 
-**Circular Dependencies**: None detected ✅
+**Circular Dependencies**: None detected
 
 **Broken Dependencies**:
 - IMPL-2.3 depends on "IMPL-2.4" (non-existent)
@@ -311,111 +332,116 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 ### Next Actions
 
-#### If CRITICAL Issues Exist (Current Status: 2 CRITICAL)
-**Recommendation**: ❌ **BLOCK EXECUTION** - Resolve CRITICAL issues before proceeding
+#### Action Recommendations
 
-**Required Actions**:
-1. **CRITICAL**: Add authentication implementation tasks to cover FR-03
-2. **CRITICAL**: Add performance optimization tasks to cover NFR-01
+**Recommendation Decision Matrix**:
 
-#### If Only HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW Issues
-**Recommendation**: ⚠️ **PROCEED WITH CAUTION** - Issues are non-blocking but should be addressed
+| Condition | Recommendation | Action |
+|-----------|----------------|--------|
+| Critical > 0 | BLOCK_EXECUTION | Must resolve all critical issues before proceeding |
+| Critical = 0, High > 0 | PROCEED_WITH_FIXES | Fix high-priority issues before execution |
+| Critical = 0, High = 0, Medium > 0 | PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION | Proceed with awareness of medium issues |
+| Only Low or None | PROCEED | Safe to execute workflow |
 
-**Suggested Improvements**:
-1. Add context.artifacts references to all tasks (use /task:replan)
-2. Fix broken dependency IMPL-2.3 → IMPL-2.4
-3. Add flow_control.target_files to underspecified tasks
+**If CRITICAL Issues Exist** (BLOCK_EXECUTION):
+- Resolve all critical issues before proceeding
+- Use TodoWrite to track required fixes
+- Fix broken dependencies and circular references first
 
-#### Command Suggestions
+**If HIGH Issues Exist** (PROCEED_WITH_FIXES):
+- Fix high-priority issues before execution
+- Use TodoWrite to systematically track and complete improvements
+
+**If Only MEDIUM/LOW Issues** (PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION / PROCEED):
+- Can proceed with execution
+- Address issues during or after implementation
+
+#### TodoWrite-Based Remediation Workflow
+
+**Report Location**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`
+
+**Recommended Workflow**:
+1. **Create TodoWrite Task List**: Extract all findings from report
+2. **Process by Priority**: CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM → LOW
+3. **Complete Each Fix**: Mark tasks as in_progress/completed as you work
+4. **Validate Changes**: Verify each modification against requirements
+
+**TodoWrite Task Structure Example**:
+```markdown
+Priority Order:
+1. Fix coverage gaps (CRITICAL)
+2. Resolve consistency conflicts (CRITICAL/HIGH)
+3. Add missing specifications (MEDIUM)
+4. Improve task quality (LOW)
+```
+
+**Notes**:
+- TodoWrite provides real-time progress tracking
+- Each finding becomes a trackable todo item
+- User can monitor progress throughout remediation
+- Architecture drift in IMPL_PLAN requires manual editing
+```
+
+### 7. Save Report and Execute TodoWrite-Based Remediation
+
+**Step 7.1: Save Analysis Report**:
 ```bash
-# Fix critical coverage gaps
-/task:create "Implement user authentication (FR-03)"
-/task:create "Add performance optimization (NFR-01)"
-
-# Refine existing tasks
-/task:replan IMPL-1.2 "Add context.artifacts and target_files"
-
-# Update IMPL_PLAN if architecture drift detected
-# (Manual edit required)
-```
+report_path = ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
+Write(report_path, full_report_content)
 ```
 
-### 7. Provide Remediation Options
+**Step 7.2: Display Report Summary to User**:
+- Show executive summary with counts
+- Display recommendation (BLOCK/PROCEED_WITH_FIXES/PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION/PROCEED)
+- List critical and high issues if any
 
-At end of report, ask the user:
+**Step 7.3: After Report Generation**:
+
+1. **Extract Findings**: Parse all issues by severity
+2. **Create TodoWrite Task List**: Convert findings to actionable todos
+3. **Execute Fixes**: Process each todo systematically
+4. **Update Task Files**: Apply modifications directly to task JSON files
+5. **Update IMPL_PLAN**: Apply strategic changes if needed
+
+At end of report, provide remediation guidance:
 
 ```markdown
-### 🔧 Remediation Options
+### 🔧 Remediation Workflow
 
-Would you like me to:
-1. **Generate task suggestions** for unmapped requirements (no auto-creation)
-2. **Provide specific edit commands** for top N issues (you execute manually)
-3. **Create remediation checklist** for systematic fixing
+**Recommended Approach**:
+1. **Initialize TodoWrite**: Create comprehensive task list from all findings
+2. **Process by Severity**: Start with CRITICAL, then HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW
+3. **Apply Fixes Directly**: Modify task.json files and IMPL_PLAN.md as needed
+4. **Track Progress**: Mark todos as completed after each fix
 
-(Do NOT apply fixes automatically - this is read-only analysis)
+**TodoWrite Execution Pattern**:
+```bash
+# Step 1: Create task list from verification report
+TodoWrite([
+  { content: "Fix FR-03 coverage gap - add authentication task", status: "pending", activeForm: "Fixing FR-03 coverage gap" },
+  { content: "Fix IMPL-1.2 consistency - align with ADR-02", status: "pending", activeForm: "Fixing IMPL-1.2 consistency" },
+  { content: "Add context.artifacts to IMPL-1.2", status: "pending", activeForm: "Adding context.artifacts to IMPL-1.2" },
+  # ... additional todos for each finding
+])
+
+# Step 2: Process each todo systematically
+# Mark as in_progress when starting
+# Apply fix using Read/Edit tools
+# Mark as completed when done
+# Move to next priority item
 ```
 
-### 8. Update Session Metadata
+**File Modification Workflow**:
+```bash
+# For task JSON modifications:
+1. Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.task/IMPL-X.Y.json)
+2. Edit() to apply fixes
+3. Mark todo as completed
 
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "PLAN": {
-      "status": "completed",
-      "action_plan_verification": {
-        "completed": true,
-        "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "overall_risk_level": "HIGH",
-        "recommendation": "PROCEED_WITH_FIXES",
-        "issues": {
-          "critical": 2,
-          "high": 5,
-          "medium": 8,
-          "low": 3
-        },
-        "coverage": {
-          "functional_requirements": 0.85,
-          "non_functional_requirements": 0.40,
-          "business_requirements": 1.00
-        },
-        "report_path": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
+# For IMPL_PLAN modifications:
+1. Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/IMPL_PLAN.md)
+2. Edit() to apply strategic changes
+3. Mark todo as completed
 ```
 
-## Operating Principles
-
-### Context Efficiency
-- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings
-- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
-- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
-- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent IDs and counts
-
-### Analysis Guidelines
-- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
-- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
-- **Prioritize synthesis violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
-- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances)
-- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
-
-### Verification Taxonomy
-- **Coverage**: Requirements → Tasks mapping
-- **Consistency**: Cross-artifact alignment
-- **Dependencies**: Task ordering and relationships
-- **Synthesis Alignment**: Adherence to authoritative requirements
-- **Task Quality**: Specification completeness
-- **Feasibility**: Implementation risks
-
-## Behavior Rules
-
-- **If no issues found**: Report "✅ Action plan verification passed. No issues detected." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:execute`.
-- **If CRITICAL issues exist**: Recommend blocking execution until resolved.
-- **If only HIGH/MEDIUM issues**: User may proceed with caution, but provide improvement suggestions.
-- **If IMPL_PLAN.md or task files missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:plan` first.
-- **Always provide actionable remediation suggestions**: Don't just identify problems—suggest solutions.
-
-## Context
-
-{ARGS}
+**Note**: All fixes execute immediately after user confirmation without additional commands.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/api-designer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,587 @@
+---
+name: api-designer
+description: Generate or update api-designer/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for API design perspective
+argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+## 🔌 **API Designer Analysis Generator**
+
+### Purpose
+**Specialized command for generating api-designer/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from backend API design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+
+### Core Function
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
+- **API Design Focus**: RESTful/GraphQL API design, endpoint structure, and contract definition
+- **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
+- **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
+
+### Analysis Scope
+- **API Architecture**: RESTful/GraphQL design patterns and best practices
+- **Endpoint Design**: Resource modeling, URL structure, and HTTP method selection
+- **Data Contracts**: Request/response schemas, validation rules, and data transformation
+- **API Documentation**: OpenAPI/Swagger specifications and developer experience
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (API Contract Within Architectural Framework)**
+- **API Contract Definition**: Specific endpoint paths, HTTP methods, and status codes
+- **Resource Modeling**: Mapping domain entities to RESTful resources or GraphQL types
+- **Request/Response Schemas**: Detailed data contracts, validation rules, and error formats
+- **API Versioning Strategy**: Version management, deprecation policies, and migration paths
+- **Developer Experience**: API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger), code examples, and SDKs
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **System Architecture Decisions**: Microservices vs monolithic, overall communication patterns → Defers to **System Architect**
+- **Canonical Data Model**: Underlying data schemas and entity relationships → Defers to **Data Architect**
+- **UI/Frontend Integration**: How clients consume the API → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **FROM System Architect**: Receives architectural constraints (REST vs GraphQL, sync vs async) that define the design space
+- **FROM Data Architect**: Receives canonical data model and translates it into public API data contracts (as projection/view)
+- **TO Frontend Teams**: Provides complete API specifications, documentation, and integration guides
+
+## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+
+### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
+```bash
+# Check active session and framework
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
+IF active_session EXISTS:
+    session_id = get_active_session()
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
+    IF EXISTS:
+        framework_mode = true
+        load_framework = true
+    ELSE:
+        IF topic_provided:
+            framework_mode = false  # Create analysis without framework
+        ELSE:
+            ERROR: "No framework found and no topic provided"
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Analysis Mode Detection
+```bash
+# Check existing analysis
+CHECK: brainstorm_dir/api-designer/analysis.md
+IF EXISTS:
+    SHOW existing analysis summary
+    ASK: "Analysis exists. Do you want to:"
+    OPTIONS:
+      1. "Update with new insights" → Update existing
+      2. "Replace completely" → Generate new
+      3. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+ELSE:
+    CREATE new analysis
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Agent Task Generation
+**Framework-Based Analysis** (when guidance-specification.md exists):
+```bash
+Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
+     prompt="Generate API designer analysis addressing topic framework
+
+     ## Framework Integration Required
+     **MANDATORY**: Load and address guidance-specification.md discussion points
+     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
+     **Output Location**: {session.brainstorm_dir}/api-designer/analysis.md
+
+     ## Analysis Requirements
+     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read guidance-specification.md completely
+     2. **Address Each Discussion Point**: Respond to all 5 framework sections from API design perspective
+     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../guidance-specification.md
+     4. **API Design Focus**: Emphasize endpoint structure, data contracts, versioning strategies
+     5. **Structured Response**: Use framework structure for analysis organization
+
+     ## Framework Sections to Address
+     - Core Requirements (from API design perspective)
+     - Technical Considerations (detailed API architecture analysis)
+     - User Experience Factors (developer experience and API usability)
+     - Implementation Challenges (API design risks and solutions)
+     - Success Metrics (API performance metrics and adoption tracking)
+
+     ## Output Structure Required
+     ```markdown
+     # API Designer Analysis: [Topic]
+
+     **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md
+     **Role Focus**: Backend API Design and Contract Definition
+
+     ## Core Requirements Analysis
+     [Address framework requirements from API design perspective]
+
+     ## Technical Considerations
+     [Detailed API architecture and endpoint design analysis]
+
+     ## Developer Experience Factors
+     [API usability, documentation, and integration ease]
+
+     ## Implementation Challenges
+     [API design risks and mitigation strategies]
+
+     ## Success Metrics
+     [API performance metrics, adoption rates, and developer satisfaction]
+
+     ## API Design-Specific Recommendations
+     [Detailed API design recommendations and best practices]
+     ```",
+     description="Generate API designer framework-based analysis")
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update Mechanism
+**Analysis Update Process**:
+```bash
+# For existing analysis updates
+IF update_mode = "incremental":
+    Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         run_in_background=false,
+         prompt="Update existing API designer analysis
+
+         ## Current Analysis Context
+         **Existing Analysis**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/api-designer/analysis.md
+         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
+
+         ## Update Requirements
+         1. **Preserve Structure**: Maintain existing analysis structure
+         2. **Add New Insights**: Integrate new API design insights and recommendations
+         3. **Framework Alignment**: Ensure continued alignment with topic framework
+         4. **API Updates**: Add new endpoint patterns, versioning strategies, documentation improvements
+         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../guidance-specification.md reference
+
+         ## Update Instructions
+         - Read existing analysis completely
+         - Identify areas for enhancement or new insights
+         - Add API design depth while preserving original structure
+         - Update recommendations with new API design patterns and approaches
+         - Maintain framework discussion point addressing",
+         description="Update API designer analysis incrementally")
+```
+
+## Document Structure
+
+### Output Files
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
+├── guidance-specification.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
+└── api-designer/
+    └── analysis.md            # ★ OUTPUT: Framework-based analysis
+```
+
+### Analysis Structure
+**Required Elements**:
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md (if framework exists)
+- **Role Focus**: Backend API Design and Contract Definition perspective
+- **5 Framework Sections**: Address each framework discussion point
+- **API Design Recommendations**: Endpoint-specific insights and solutions
+
+## ⚡ **Two-Step Execution Flow**
+
+### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
+Session detection and selection:
+```bash
+# Check for active sessions
+active_sessions=$(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
+if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
+  prompt_user_to_select_session()
+else
+  use_existing_or_create_new()
+fi
+```
+
+### Step 1: Context Gathering Phase
+**API Designer Perspective Questioning**
+
+Before agent assignment, gather comprehensive API design context:
+
+#### 📋 Role-Specific Questions
+1. **API Type & Architecture**
+   - RESTful, GraphQL, or hybrid API approach?
+   - Synchronous vs asynchronous communication patterns?
+   - Real-time requirements (WebSocket, Server-Sent Events)?
+
+2. **Resource Modeling & Endpoints**
+   - What are the core domain resources/entities?
+   - Expected CRUD operations for each resource?
+   - Complex query requirements (filtering, sorting, pagination)?
+
+3. **Data Contracts & Validation**
+   - Request/response data format requirements (JSON, XML, Protocol Buffers)?
+   - Input validation and sanitization requirements?
+   - Data transformation and mapping needs?
+
+4. **API Management & Governance**
+   - API versioning strategy requirements?
+   - Authentication and authorization mechanisms?
+   - Rate limiting and throttling requirements?
+   - API documentation and developer portal needs?
+
+5. **Integration & Compatibility**
+   - Client platforms consuming the API (web, mobile, third-party)?
+   - Backward compatibility requirements?
+   - External API integrations needed?
+
+#### Context Validation
+- **Minimum Response**: Each answer must be ≥50 characters
+- **Re-prompting**: Insufficient detail triggers follow-up questions
+- **Context Storage**: Save responses to `.brainstorming/api-designer-context.md`
+
+### Step 2: Agent Assignment with Flow Control
+**Dedicated Agent Execution**
+
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute dedicated api-designer conceptual analysis for: {topic}
+
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: api-designer
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .brainstorming/api-designer/
+USER_CONTEXT: {validated_responses_from_context_gathering}
+
+Flow Control Steps:
+[
+  {
+    \"step\": \"load_role_template\",
+    \"action\": \"Load api-designer planning template\",
+    \"command\": \"bash($(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/api-designer.md))\",
+    \"output_to\": \"role_template\"
+  }
+]
+
+Conceptual Analysis Requirements:
+- Apply api-designer perspective to topic analysis
+- Focus on endpoint design, data contracts, and API governance
+- Use loaded role template framework for analysis structure
+- Generate role-specific deliverables in designated output location
+- Address all user context from questioning phase
+
+Deliverables:
+- analysis.md: Main API design analysis
+- api-specification.md: Detailed endpoint specifications
+- data-contracts.md: Request/response schemas and validation rules
+- api-documentation.md: API documentation strategy and templates
+
+Embody api-designer role expertise for comprehensive conceptual planning."
+```
+
+### Progress Tracking
+TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Gather API designer context through role-specific questioning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering context"},
+  {"content": "Validate context responses and save to api-designer-context.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating context"},
+  {"content": "Load api-designer planning template via flow control", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading template"},
+  {"content": "Execute dedicated conceptual-planning-agent for api-designer role", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing agent"}
+]
+```
+
+## 📊 **Output Specification**
+
+### Output Location
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/api-designer/
+├── analysis.md                 # Primary API design analysis
+├── api-specification.md        # Detailed endpoint specifications (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+├── data-contracts.md           # Request/response schemas and validation rules
+├── versioning-strategy.md      # API versioning and backward compatibility plan
+└── developer-guide.md          # API usage documentation and integration examples
+```
+
+### Document Templates
+
+#### analysis.md Structure
+```markdown
+# API Design Analysis: {Topic}
+*Generated: {timestamp}*
+
+## Executive Summary
+[Key API design findings and recommendations overview]
+
+## API Architecture Overview
+### API Type Selection (REST/GraphQL/Hybrid)
+### Communication Patterns
+### Authentication & Authorization Strategy
+
+## Resource Modeling
+### Core Domain Resources
+### Resource Relationships
+### URL Structure and Naming Conventions
+
+## Endpoint Design
+### Resource Endpoints
+- GET /api/v1/resources
+- POST /api/v1/resources
+- GET /api/v1/resources/{id}
+- PUT /api/v1/resources/{id}
+- DELETE /api/v1/resources/{id}
+
+### Query Parameters
+- Filtering: ?filter[field]=value
+- Sorting: ?sort=field,-field2
+- Pagination: ?page=1&limit=20
+
+### HTTP Methods and Status Codes
+- Success responses (2xx)
+- Client errors (4xx)
+- Server errors (5xx)
+
+## Data Contracts
+### Request Schemas
+[JSON Schema or OpenAPI definitions]
+
+### Response Schemas
+[JSON Schema or OpenAPI definitions]
+
+### Validation Rules
+- Required fields
+- Data types and formats
+- Business logic constraints
+
+## API Versioning Strategy
+### Versioning Approach (URL/Header/Accept)
+### Version Lifecycle Management
+### Deprecation Policy
+### Migration Paths
+
+## Security & Governance
+### Authentication Mechanisms
+- OAuth 2.0 / JWT / API Keys
+### Authorization Patterns
+- RBAC / ABAC / Resource-based
+### Rate Limiting & Throttling
+### CORS and Security Headers
+
+## Error Handling
+### Standard Error Response Format
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "ERROR_CODE",
+    "message": "Human-readable error message",
+    "details": [],
+    "trace_id": "uuid"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Error Code Taxonomy
+### Validation Error Responses
+
+## API Documentation
+### OpenAPI/Swagger Specification
+### Developer Portal Requirements
+### Code Examples and SDKs
+### Changelog and Migration Guides
+
+## Performance Optimization
+### Response Caching Strategies
+### Compression (gzip, brotli)
+### Field Selection (sparse fieldsets)
+### Bulk Operations and Batch Endpoints
+
+## Monitoring & Observability
+### API Metrics
+- Request count, latency, error rates
+- Endpoint usage analytics
+### Logging Strategy
+### Distributed Tracing
+
+## Developer Experience
+### API Usability Assessment
+### Integration Complexity
+### SDK and Client Library Needs
+### Sandbox and Testing Environments
+```
+
+#### api-specification.md Structure
+```markdown
+# API Specification: {Topic}
+*OpenAPI 3.0 Specification*
+
+## API Information
+- **Title**: {API Name}
+- **Version**: 1.0.0
+- **Base URL**: https://api.example.com/v1
+- **Contact**: api-team@example.com
+
+## Endpoints
+
+### Users API
+
+#### GET /users
+**Description**: Retrieve a list of users
+
+**Parameters**:
+- `page` (query, integer): Page number (default: 1)
+- `limit` (query, integer): Items per page (default: 20, max: 100)
+- `sort` (query, string): Sort field (e.g., "created_at", "-updated_at")
+- `filter[status]` (query, string): Filter by user status
+
+**Response 200**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": [
+    {
+      "id": "uuid",
+      "username": "string",
+      "email": "string",
+      "created_at": "2025-10-15T00:00:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "meta": {
+    "page": 1,
+    "limit": 20,
+    "total": 100
+  },
+  "links": {
+    "self": "/users?page=1",
+    "next": "/users?page=2",
+    "prev": null
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### POST /users
+**Description**: Create a new user
+
+**Request Body**:
+```json
+{
+  "username": "string (required, 3-50 chars)",
+  "email": "string (required, valid email)",
+  "password": "string (required, min 8 chars)",
+  "profile": {
+    "first_name": "string (optional)",
+    "last_name": "string (optional)"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Response 201**:
+```json
+{
+  "data": {
+    "id": "uuid",
+    "username": "string",
+    "email": "string",
+    "created_at": "2025-10-15T00:00:00Z"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Response 400** (Validation Error):
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
+    "message": "Request validation failed",
+    "details": [
+      {
+        "field": "email",
+        "message": "Invalid email format"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+[Continue for all endpoints...]
+
+## Authentication
+
+### OAuth 2.0 Flow
+1. Client requests authorization
+2. User grants permission
+3. Client receives access token
+4. Client uses token in requests
+
+**Header Format**:
+```
+Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
+```
+
+## Rate Limiting
+
+**Headers**:
+- `X-RateLimit-Limit`: 1000
+- `X-RateLimit-Remaining`: 999
+- `X-RateLimit-Reset`: 1634270400
+
+**Response 429** (Too Many Requests):
+```json
+{
+  "error": {
+    "code": "RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED",
+    "message": "API rate limit exceeded",
+    "retry_after": 3600
+  }
+}
+```
+```
+
+## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+
+### Status Synchronization
+Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "BRAINSTORM": {
+      "api_designer": {
+        "status": "completed",
+        "completed_at": "timestamp",
+        "output_directory": ".workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/api-designer/",
+        "key_insights": ["endpoint_design", "versioning_strategy", "data_contracts"]
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Cross-Role Collaboration
+API designer perspective provides:
+- **API Contract Specifications** → Frontend Developer
+- **Data Schema Requirements** → Data Architect
+- **Security Requirements** → Security Expert
+- **Integration Endpoints** → System Architect
+- **Performance Constraints** → DevOps Engineer
+
+## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
+
+### Required Analysis Elements
+- [ ] Complete endpoint inventory with HTTP methods and paths
+- [ ] Detailed request/response schemas with validation rules
+- [ ] Clear versioning strategy and backward compatibility plan
+- [ ] Comprehensive error handling and status code usage
+- [ ] API documentation strategy (OpenAPI/Swagger)
+
+### API Design Principles
+- [ ] **Consistency**: Uniform naming conventions and patterns across all endpoints
+- [ ] **Simplicity**: Intuitive resource modeling and URL structures
+- [ ] **Flexibility**: Support for filtering, sorting, pagination, and field selection
+- [ ] **Security**: Proper authentication, authorization, and input validation
+- [ ] **Performance**: Caching strategies, compression, and efficient data structures
+
+### Developer Experience Validation
+- [ ] API is self-documenting with clear endpoint descriptions
+- [ ] Error messages are actionable and helpful for debugging
+- [ ] Response formats are consistent and predictable
+- [ ] Code examples and integration guides are provided
+- [ ] Sandbox environment available for testing
+
+### Technical Completeness
+- [ ] **Resource Modeling**: All domain entities mapped to API resources
+- [ ] **CRUD Coverage**: Complete create, read, update, delete operations
+- [ ] **Query Capabilities**: Advanced filtering, sorting, and search functionality
+- [ ] **Versioning**: Clear version management and migration paths
+- [ ] **Monitoring**: API metrics, logging, and tracing strategies defined
+
+### Integration Readiness
+- [ ] **Client Compatibility**: API works with all target client platforms
+- [ ] **External Integration**: Third-party API dependencies identified
+- [ ] **Backward Compatibility**: Changes don't break existing clients
+- [ ] **Migration Path**: Clear upgrade paths for API consumers
+- [ ] **SDK Support**: Client libraries and code generation considered

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/artifacts.md

@@ -1,371 +1,453 @@
 ---
 name: artifacts
-description: Generate role-specific topic-framework.md dynamically based on selected roles
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>" [--roles "role1,role2,role3"]
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for framework generation"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize database performance" --roles "system-architect,data-architect,subject-matter-expert"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Implement secure authentication system" --roles "ui-designer,ux-expert,subject-matter-expert"
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
+description: Interactive clarification generating confirmed guidance specification through role-based analysis and synthesis
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description [--count N]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
 ---
 
-# Topic Framework Generator Command
+## Overview
 
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "<topic>" [--roles "role1,role2,role3"]
-```
+Seven-phase workflow: **Context collection** → **Topic analysis** → **Role selection** → **Role questions** → **Conflict resolution** → **Final check** → **Generate specification**
 
-## Purpose
-**Generate dynamic topic-framework.md tailored to selected roles**. Creates role-specific discussion frameworks that address relevant perspectives. If no roles specified, generates comprehensive framework covering common analysis areas.
+All user interactions use AskUserQuestion tool (max 4 questions per call, multi-round).
 
-## Role-Based Framework Generation
+**Input**: `"GOAL: [objective] SCOPE: [boundaries] CONTEXT: [background]" [--count N]`
+**Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
+**Core Principle**: Questions dynamically generated from project context + topic keywords, NOT generic templates
 
-**Dynamic Generation**: Framework content adapts based on selected roles
-- **With roles**: Generate targeted discussion points for specified roles only
-- **Without roles**: Generate comprehensive framework covering all common areas
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Topic Framework Generation Process
-
-**Phase 1: Session Management** ⚠️ FIRST STEP
-- **Active session detection**: Check `.workflow/.active-*` markers
-- **Session selection**: Prompt user if multiple active sessions found
-- **Auto-creation**: Create `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Framework check**: Check if `topic-framework.md` exists (update vs create mode)
-
-**Phase 2: Role Analysis** ⚠️ NEW
-- **Parse roles parameter**: Extract roles from `--roles "role1,role2,role3"` if provided
-- **Role validation**: Verify each role is valid (matches available role commands)
-- **Store role list**: Save selected roles to session metadata for reference
-- **Default behavior**: If no roles specified, use comprehensive coverage
-
-**Phase 3: Dynamic Topic Analysis**
-- **Scope definition**: Define topic boundaries and objectives
-- **Stakeholder identification**: Identify key users and stakeholders based on selected roles
-- **Requirements gathering**: Extract requirements relevant to selected roles
-- **Context collection**: Gather context appropriate for role perspectives
-
-**Phase 4: Role-Specific Framework Generation**
-- **Discussion points creation**: Generate 3-5 discussion areas **tailored to selected roles**
-- **Role-targeted questions**: Create questions specifically for chosen roles
-- **Framework document**: Generate `topic-framework.md` with role-specific sections
-- **Validation check**: Ensure framework addresses all selected role perspectives
-
-**Phase 5: Metadata Storage**
-- **Save role assignment**: Store selected roles in session metadata
-- **Framework versioning**: Track which roles framework addresses
-- **Update tracking**: Maintain role evolution if framework updated
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Discussion-Driven Analysis
-**Interactive Approach**: Direct conversation and exploration without predefined role constraints
-
-**Process Flow**:
-1. **Topic introduction**: Understanding scope and context
-2. **Exploratory questioning**: Open-ended investigation
-3. **Component identification**: Breaking down into manageable pieces
-4. **Relationship analysis**: Understanding connections and dependencies
-5. **Documentation generation**: Structured capture of insights
-
-**Key Areas of Investigation**:
-- **Functional aspects**: What the topic needs to accomplish
-- **Technical considerations**: Implementation constraints and requirements
-- **User perspectives**: How different stakeholders are affected
-- **Business implications**: Cost, timeline, and strategic considerations
-- **Risk assessment**: Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
-
-### Document Generation Standards
-
-**Always Created**:
-- **discussion-summary.md**: Main conversation points and key insights
-- **component-analysis.md**: Detailed breakdown of topic components
-
-## Document Generation
-
-**Primary Output**: Single structured `topic-framework.md` document
-
-**Document Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
-└── topic-framework.md          # ★ STRUCTURED FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT
-```
-
-**Note**: `workflow-session.json` is located at `.workflow/WFS-[topic]/workflow-session.json` (session root), not inside `.brainstorming/`.
-
-## Framework Template Structures
-
-### Dynamic Role-Based Framework
-
-Framework content adapts based on `--roles` parameter:
-
-#### Option 1: Specific Roles Provided
-```markdown
-# [Topic] - Discussion Framework
-
-## Topic Overview
-- **Scope**: [Topic boundaries relevant to selected roles]
-- **Objectives**: [Goals from perspective of selected roles]
-- **Context**: [Background focusing on role-specific concerns]
-- **Target Roles**: ui-designer, system-architect, subject-matter-expert
-
-## Role-Specific Discussion Points
-
-### For UI Designer
-1. **User Interface Requirements**
-   - What interface components are needed?
-   - What user interactions must be supported?
-   - What visual design considerations apply?
-
-2. **User Experience Challenges**
-   - What are the key user journeys?
-   - What accessibility requirements exist?
-   - How to balance aesthetics with functionality?
-
-### For System Architect
-1. **Architecture Decisions**
-   - What architectural patterns fit this solution?
-   - What scalability requirements exist?
-   - How does this integrate with existing systems?
-
-2. **Technical Implementation**
-   - What technology stack is appropriate?
-   - What are the performance requirements?
-   - What dependencies must be managed?
-
-### For Subject Matter Expert
-1. **Domain Expertise & Standards**
-   - What industry standards and best practices apply?
-   - What regulatory compliance requirements exist?
-   - What domain-specific patterns should be followed?
-
-2. **Technical Quality & Risk**
-   - What technical debt considerations exist?
-   - What scalability and maintenance implications apply?
-   - What knowledge transfer and documentation is needed?
-
-## Cross-Role Integration Points
-- How do UI decisions impact architecture?
-- How does architecture constrain UI possibilities?
-- What domain standards affect both UI and architecture?
-
-## Framework Usage
-**For Role Agents**: Address your specific section + integration points
-**Reference Format**: @../topic-framework.md in your analysis.md
-**Update Process**: Use /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts to update
+**Parameters**:
+- `topic` (required): Topic or challenge description (structured format recommended)
+- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles to select (system recommends N+2 options, default: 3)
 
 ---
-*Generated for roles: ui-designer, system-architect, subject-matter-expert*
-*Last updated: [timestamp]*
-```
 
-#### Option 2: No Roles Specified (Comprehensive)
-```markdown
-# [Topic] - Discussion Framework
+## Quick Reference
 
-## Topic Overview
-- **Scope**: [Comprehensive topic boundaries]
-- **Objectives**: [All-encompassing goals]
-- **Context**: [Full background and constraints]
-- **Stakeholders**: [All relevant parties]
+### Phase Summary
 
-## Core Discussion Areas
+| Phase | Goal | AskUserQuestion | Storage |
+|-------|------|-----------------|---------|
+| 0 | Context collection | - | context-package.json |
+| 1 | Topic analysis | 2-4 questions | intent_context |
+| 2 | Role selection | 1 multi-select | selected_roles |
+| 3 | Role questions | 3-4 per role | role_decisions[role] |
+| 4 | Conflict resolution | max 4 per round | cross_role_decisions |
+| 4.5 | Final check | progressive rounds | additional_decisions |
+| 5 | Generate spec | - | guidance-specification.md |
 
-### 1. Requirements & Objectives
-- What are the fundamental requirements?
-- What are the critical success factors?
-- What constraints must be considered?
+### AskUserQuestion Pattern
 
-### 2. Technical & Architecture
-- What are the technical challenges?
-- What architectural decisions are needed?
-- What integration points exist?
-
-### 3. User Experience & Design
-- Who are the primary users?
-- What are the key user journeys?
-- What usability requirements exist?
-
-### 4. Security & Compliance
-- What security requirements exist?
-- What compliance considerations apply?
-- What data protection is needed?
-
-### 5. Implementation & Operations
-- What are the implementation risks?
-- What resources are required?
-- How will this be maintained?
-
-## Available Role Perspectives
-Framework supports analysis from any of these roles:
-- **Technical**: system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **Product & Design**: ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile & Quality**: scrum-master, test-strategist
-
----
-*Comprehensive framework - adaptable to any role*
-*Last updated: [timestamp]*
-```
-
-## Role-Specific Content Generation
-
-### Available Roles and Their Focus Areas
-
-**Technical Roles**:
-- `system-architect`: Architecture patterns, scalability, technology stack, integration
-- `data-architect`: Data modeling, processing workflows, analytics, storage
-- `subject-matter-expert`: Domain expertise, industry standards, compliance, best practices
-
-**Product & Design Roles**:
-- `ui-designer`: User interface, visual design, interaction patterns, accessibility
-- `ux-expert`: User experience optimization, usability testing, interaction design, design systems
-- `product-manager`: Business value, feature prioritization, market positioning, roadmap
-- `product-owner`: Backlog management, user stories, acceptance criteria, stakeholder alignment
-
-**Agile & Quality Roles**:
-- `scrum-master`: Sprint planning, team dynamics, process optimization, delivery management
-- `test-strategist`: Testing strategies, quality assurance, test automation, validation approaches
-
-### Dynamic Discussion Point Generation
-
-**For each selected role, generate**:
-1. **2-3 core discussion areas** specific to that role's perspective
-2. **3-5 targeted questions** per discussion area
-3. **Cross-role integration points** showing how roles interact
-
-**Example mapping**:
 ```javascript
-// If roles = ["ui-designer", "system-architect"]
-Generate:
-- UI Designer section: UI Requirements, UX Challenges
-- System Architect section: Architecture Decisions, Technical Implementation
-- Integration Points: UI↔Architecture dependencies
+// Single-select (Phase 1, 3, 4)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "{问题文本}",
+      header: "{短标签}",  // max 12 chars
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" },
+        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" },
+        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" }
+      ]
+    }
+    // ... max 4 questions per call
+  ]
+})
+
+// Multi-select (Phase 2)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "请选择 {count} 个角色",
+    header: "角色选择",
+    multiSelect: true,
+    options: [/* max 4 options per call */]
+  }]
+})
 ```
 
-### Framework Generation Examples
+### Multi-Round Execution
 
-#### Example 1: Architecture-Heavy Topic
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Design scalable microservices platform" --roles "system-architect,data-architect,subject-matter-expert"
+```javascript
+const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
+for (let i = 0; i < allQuestions.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+  const batch = allQuestions.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
+  AskUserQuestion({ questions: batch });
+  // Store responses before next round
+}
 ```
-**Generated framework focuses on**:
-- Service architecture and communication patterns
-- Data flow and storage strategies
-- Domain standards and best practices
 
-#### Example 2: User-Focused Topic
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Improve user onboarding experience" --roles "ui-designer,ux-expert,product-manager"
+---
+
+## Task Tracking
+
+**TodoWrite Rule**: EXTEND auto-parallel's task list (NOT replace/overwrite)
+
+**When called from auto-parallel**:
+- Find artifacts parent task → Mark "in_progress"
+- APPEND sub-tasks (Phase 0-5) → Mark each as completes
+- When Phase 5 completes → Mark parent "completed"
+- PRESERVE all other auto-parallel tasks
+
+**Standalone Mode**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Initialize session", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Context collection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 0"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Topic analysis (2-4 questions)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 1"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Role selection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 2"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Role questions (per role)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 3"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict resolution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.5: Final clarification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4.5"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: Generate specification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 5"}
+]
 ```
-**Generated framework focuses on**:
-- Onboarding flow and UI components
-- User experience optimization and usability
-- Business value and success metrics
 
-#### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Optimize sprint delivery process" --roles "scrum-master,product-owner,test-strategist"
+---
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Session Management
+
+- Check `.workflow/active/` for existing sessions
+- Multiple → Prompt selection | Single → Use it | None → Create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
+- Parse `--count N` parameter (default: 3)
+- Store decisions in `workflow-session.json`
+
+### Phase 0: Context Collection
+
+**Goal**: Gather project context BEFORE user interaction
+
+**Steps**:
+1. Check if `context-package.json` exists → Skip if valid
+2. Invoke `context-search-agent` (BRAINSTORM MODE - lightweight)
+3. Output: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
+
+**Graceful Degradation**: If agent fails, continue to Phase 1 without context
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="context-search-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Gather project context for brainstorm",
+  prompt=`
+Execute context-search-agent in BRAINSTORM MODE (Phase 1-2 only).
+
+Session: ${session_id}
+Task: ${task_description}
+Output: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+
+Required fields: metadata, project_context, assets, dependencies, conflict_detection
+`
+)
 ```
-**Generated framework focuses on**:
-- Sprint planning and team collaboration
-- Backlog management and prioritization
-- Quality assurance and testing strategies
 
-#### Example 4: Comprehensive Analysis
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "Build real-time collaboration feature"
+### Phase 1: Topic Analysis
+
+**Goal**: Extract keywords/challenges enriched by Phase 0 context
+
+**Steps**:
+1. Load Phase 0 context (tech_stack, modules, conflict_risk)
+2. Deep topic analysis (entities, challenges, constraints, metrics)
+3. Generate 2-4 context-aware probing questions
+4. AskUserQuestion → Store to `session.intent_context`
+
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "实时协作平台的主要技术挑战？",
+      header: "核心挑战",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "实时数据同步", description: "100+用户同时在线，状态同步复杂度高" },
+        { label: "可扩展性架构", description: "用户规模增长时的系统扩展能力" },
+        { label: "冲突解决机制", description: "多用户同时编辑的冲突处理策略" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "MVP阶段最关注的指标？",
+      header: "优先级",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "功能完整性", description: "实现所有核心功能" },
+        { label: "用户体验", description: "流畅的交互体验和响应速度" },
+        { label: "系统稳定性", description: "高可用性和数据一致性" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
 ```
-**Generated framework covers** all aspects (no roles specified)
 
-## Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before processing
-- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active sessions
-- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
-- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session for all processing
-- **Context preservation**: All discussion and analysis stored in session directory
-- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent state
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: Questions MUST reference topic keywords. Generic "Project type?" violates dynamic generation.
 
-## Discussion Areas
+### Phase 2: Role Selection
 
-### Core Investigation Topics
-- **Purpose & Goals**: What are we trying to achieve?
-- **Scope & Boundaries**: What's included and excluded?
-- **Success Criteria**: How do we measure success?
-- **Constraints**: What limitations exist?
-- **Stakeholders**: Who is affected or involved?
+**Goal**: User selects roles from intelligent recommendations
 
-### Technical Considerations
-- **Requirements**: What must the solution provide?
-- **Dependencies**: What does it rely on?
-- **Integration**: How does it connect to existing systems?
-- **Performance**: What are the speed/scale requirements?
-- **Security**: What protection is needed?
+**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
 
-### Implementation Factors
-- **Timeline**: When is it needed?
-- **Resources**: What people/budget/tools are available?
-- **Risks**: What could go wrong?
-- **Alternatives**: What other approaches exist?
-- **Migration**: How do we transition from current state?
+**Steps**:
+1. Analyze Phase 1 keywords → Recommend count+2 roles with rationale
+2. AskUserQuestion (multiSelect=true) → Store to `session.selected_roles`
+3. If count+2 > 4, split into multiple rounds
 
-## Update Mechanism ⚠️ SMART UPDATES
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "请选择 3 个角色参与头脑风暴分析",
+    header: "角色选择",
+    multiSelect: true,
+    options: [
+      { label: "system-architect", description: "实时同步架构设计和技术选型" },
+      { label: "ui-designer", description: "协作界面用户体验和状态展示" },
+      { label: "product-manager", description: "功能优先级和MVP范围决策" },
+      { label: "data-architect", description: "数据同步模型和存储方案设计" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+```
 
-### Framework Update Logic
-```bash
-# Check existing framework
-IF topic-framework.md EXISTS:
-    SHOW current framework to user
-    ASK: "Framework exists. Do you want to:"
-    OPTIONS:
-      1. "Replace completely" → Generate new framework
-      2. "Add discussion points" → Append to existing
-      3. "Refine existing points" → Interactive editing
-      4. "Cancel" → Exit without changes
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: User MUST interact. NEVER auto-select without confirmation.
+
+### Phase 3: Role-Specific Questions
+
+**Goal**: Generate deep questions mapping role expertise to Phase 1 challenges
+
+**Algorithm**:
+1. FOR each selected role:
+   - Map Phase 1 challenges to role domain
+   - Generate 3-4 questions (implementation depth, trade-offs, edge cases)
+   - AskUserQuestion per role → Store to `session.role_decisions[role]`
+2. Process roles sequentially (one at a time for clarity)
+3. If role needs > 4 questions, split into multiple rounds
+
+**Example** (system-architect):
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "100+ 用户实时状态同步方案？",
+      header: "状态同步",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Event Sourcing", description: "完整事件历史，支持回溯，存储成本高" },
+        { label: "集中式状态管理", description: "实现简单，单点瓶颈风险" },
+        { label: "CRDT", description: "去中心化，自动合并，学习曲线陡" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "两个用户同时编辑冲突如何解决？",
+      header: "冲突解决",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "自动合并", description: "用户无感知，可能产生意外结果" },
+        { label: "手动解决", description: "用户控制，增加交互复杂度" },
+        { label: "版本控制", description: "保留历史，需要分支管理" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Conflict Resolution
+
+**Goal**: Resolve ACTUAL conflicts from Phase 3 answers
+
+**Algorithm**:
+1. Analyze Phase 3 answers for conflicts:
+   - Contradictory choices (e.g., "fast iteration" vs "complex Event Sourcing")
+   - Missing integration (e.g., "Optimistic updates" but no conflict handling)
+   - Implicit dependencies (e.g., "Live cursors" but no auth defined)
+2. Generate clarification questions referencing SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices
+3. AskUserQuestion (max 4 per call, multi-round) → Store to `session.cross_role_decisions`
+4. If NO conflicts: Skip Phase 4 (inform user: "未检测到跨角色冲突，跳过Phase 4")
+
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "CRDT 与 UI 回滚期望冲突，如何解决？\n背景：system-architect选择CRDT，ui-designer期望回滚UI",
+    header: "架构冲突",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: "采用 CRDT", description: "保持去中心化，调整UI期望" },
+      { label: "显示合并界面", description: "增加用户交互，展示冲突详情" },
+      { label: "切换到 OT", description: "支持回滚，增加服务器复杂度" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+### Phase 4.5: Final Clarification
+
+**Purpose**: Ensure no important points missed before generating specification
+
+**Steps**:
+1. Ask initial check:
+   ```javascript
+   AskUserQuestion({
+     questions: [{
+       question: "在生成最终规范之前，是否有前面未澄清的重点需要补充？",
+       header: "补充确认",
+       multiSelect: false,
+       options: [
+         { label: "无需补充", description: "前面的讨论已经足够完整" },
+         { label: "需要补充", description: "还有重要内容需要澄清" }
+       ]
+     }]
+   })
+   ```
+2. If "需要补充":
+   - Analyze user's additional points
+   - Generate progressive questions (not role-bound, interconnected)
+   - AskUserQuestion (max 4 per round) → Store to `session.additional_decisions`
+   - Repeat until user confirms completion
+3. If "无需补充": Proceed to Phase 5
+
+**Progressive Pattern**: Questions interconnected, each round informs next, continue until resolved.
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Specification
+
+**Steps**:
+1. Load all decisions: `intent_context` + `selected_roles` + `role_decisions` + `cross_role_decisions` + `additional_decisions`
+2. Transform Q&A to declarative: Questions → Headers, Answers → CONFIRMED/SELECTED statements
+3. Generate `guidance-specification.md`
+4. Update `workflow-session.json` (metadata only)
+5. Validate: No interrogative sentences, all decisions traceable
+
+---
+
+## Question Guidelines
+
+### Core Principle
+
+**Target**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
+
+**Question Structure**: `[业务场景/需求前提] + [技术关注点]`
+**Option Structure**: `标签：[技术方案] + 说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]`
+
+### Quality Rules
+
+**MUST Include**:
+- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+- ✅ 业务场景作为问题前提
+- ✅ 技术选项的业务影响说明
+- ✅ 量化指标和约束条件
+
+**MUST Avoid**:
+- ❌ 纯技术选型无业务上下文
+- ❌ 过度抽象的用户体验问题
+- ❌ 脱离话题的通用架构问题
+
+### Phase-Specific Requirements
+
+| Phase | Focus | Key Requirements |
+|-------|-------|------------------|
+| 1 | 意图理解 | Reference topic keywords, 用户场景、业务约束、优先级 |
+| 2 | 角色推荐 | Intelligent analysis (NOT keyword mapping), explain relevance |
+| 3 | 角色问题 | Reference Phase 1 keywords, concrete options with trade-offs |
+| 4 | 冲突解决 | Reference SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices, explain impact on both roles |
+
+---
+
+## Output & Governance
+
+### Output Template
+
+**File**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
+
+```markdown
+# [Project] - Confirmed Guidance Specification
+
+**Metadata**: [timestamp, type, focus, roles]
+
+## 1. Project Positioning & Goals
+**CONFIRMED Objectives**: [from topic + Phase 1]
+**CONFIRMED Success Criteria**: [from Phase 1 answers]
+
+## 2-N. [Role] Decisions
+### SELECTED Choices
+**[Question topic]**: [User's answer]
+- **Rationale**: [From option description]
+- **Impact**: [Implications]
+
+### Cross-Role Considerations
+**[Conflict resolved]**: [Resolution from Phase 4]
+- **Affected Roles**: [Roles involved]
+
+## Cross-Role Integration
+**CONFIRMED Integration Points**: [API/Data/Auth from multiple roles]
+
+## Risks & Constraints
+**Identified Risks**: [From answers] → Mitigation: [Approach]
+
+## Next Steps
+**⚠️ Automatic Continuation** (when called from auto-parallel):
+- auto-parallel assigns agents for role-specific analysis
+- Each selected role gets conceptual-planning-agent
+- Agents read this guidance-specification.md for context
+
+## Appendix: Decision Tracking
+| Decision ID | Category | Question | Selected | Phase | Rationale |
+|-------------|----------|----------|----------|-------|-----------|
+| D-001 | Intent | [Q] | [A] | 1 | [Why] |
+| D-002 | Roles | [Selected] | [Roles] | 2 | [Why] |
+| D-003+ | [Role] | [Q] | [A] | 3 | [Why] |
+```
+
+### File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/
+├── workflow-session.json              # Metadata ONLY
+├── .process/
+│   └── context-package.json           # Phase 0 output
+└── .brainstorming/
+    └── guidance-specification.md      # Full guidance content
+```
+
+### Session Metadata
+
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-{topic-slug}",
+  "type": "brainstorming",
+  "topic": "{original user input}",
+  "selected_roles": ["system-architect", "ui-designer", "product-manager"],
+  "phase_completed": "artifacts",
+  "timestamp": "2025-10-24T10:30:00Z",
+  "count_parameter": 3
+}
+```
+
+**⚠️ Rule**: Session JSON stores ONLY metadata. All guidance content goes to guidance-specification.md.
+
+### Validation Checklist
+
+- ✅ No interrogative sentences (use CONFIRMED/SELECTED)
+- ✅ Every decision traceable to user answer
+- ✅ Cross-role conflicts resolved or documented
+- ✅ Next steps concrete and specific
+- ✅ No content duplication between .json and .md
+
+### Update Mechanism
+
+```
+IF guidance-specification.md EXISTS:
+  Prompt: "Regenerate completely / Update sections / Cancel"
 ELSE:
-    CREATE new framework
+  Run full Phase 0-5 flow
 ```
 
-### Update Strategies
+### Governance Rules
 
-**1. Complete Replacement**
-- Backup existing framework as `topic-framework-[timestamp].md.backup`
-- Generate completely new framework
-- Preserve role-specific analysis points from previous version
+- All decisions MUST use CONFIRMED/SELECTED (NO "?" in decision sections)
+- Every decision MUST trace to user answer
+- Conflicts MUST be resolved (not marked "TBD")
+- Next steps MUST be actionable
+- Topic preserved as authoritative reference
 
-**2. Incremental Addition**
-- Load existing framework
-- Identify new discussion areas through user interaction
-- Add new sections while preserving existing structure
-- Update framework usage instructions
-
-**3. Refinement Mode**
-- Interactive editing of existing discussion points
-- Allow modification of scope, objectives, and questions
-- Preserve framework structure and role assignments
-- Update timestamp and version info
-
-### Version Control
-- **Backup Creation**: Always backup before major changes
-- **Change Tracking**: Include change summary in framework footer
-- **Rollback Support**: Keep previous version accessible
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Session creation failure**: Provide clear error message and retry option
-- **Discussion stalling**: Offer structured prompts to continue exploration
-- **Documentation issues**: Graceful handling of file creation problems
-- **Missing context**: Prompt for additional information when needed
-
-## Reference Information
-
-### File Structure Reference
-**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-**Session Management**: Standard workflow session protocols
-
-### Integration Points
-- **Compatible with**: Other brainstorming commands in the same session
-- **Builds foundation for**: More detailed planning and implementation phases
-- **Outputs used by**: `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` command for cross-analysis integration
+**CRITICAL**: Guidance is single source of truth for downstream phases. Ambiguity violates governance.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-parallel.md

@@ -1,330 +1,443 @@
 ---
 name: auto-parallel
-description: Parallel brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and concurrent execution
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>"
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "Implement secure authentication system"
+description: Parallel brainstorming automation with dynamic role selection and concurrent execution across multiple perspectives
+argument-hint: "topic or challenge description" [--count N]
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
 ---
 
 # Workflow Brainstorm Parallel Auto Command
 
+## Coordinator Role
+
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Dispatches 3 phases in sequence (interactive framework → parallel role analysis → synthesis), coordinating specialized commands/agents through task attachment model.
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand dispatch **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- Task agent dispatch **attaches analysis tasks** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Phase 1: artifacts command attaches its internal tasks (Phase 1-5)
+- Phase 2: N conceptual-planning-agent tasks attached in parallel
+- Phase 3: synthesis command attaches its internal tasks
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially (Phase 1, 3) or in parallel (Phase 2)
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow**:
+
+This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 1 (artifacts) handles user interaction, Phase 2 (role agents) runs in parallel.
+
+1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "topic" [--count N]`
+2. **Dispatch Phase 1** → artifacts command (tasks ATTACHED) → Auto-continues
+3. **Dispatch Phase 2** → Parallel role agents (N tasks ATTACHED concurrently) → Auto-continues
+4. **Dispatch Phase 3** → Synthesis command (tasks ATTACHED) → Reports final summary
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When Phase 1 (artifacts) finishes executing, automatically load roles and launch Phase 2 agents
+- When Phase 2 (all agents) finishes executing, automatically execute Phase 3 synthesis
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is dispatch Phase 1 command
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not analyze topic before Phase 1 - artifacts handles all analysis
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract selected_roles from workflow-session.json after Phase 1
+4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to dispatch next pending phase automatically
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand and Task dispatches **attach** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and dispatch next phase
+8. **Parallel Execution**: Phase 2 attaches multiple agent tasks simultaneously for concurrent execution
+
 ## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>"
-```
-
-## Role Selection Logic
-- **Technical & Architecture**: `architecture|system|performance|database|security` → system-architect, data-architect, security-expert, subject-matter-expert
-- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, user-researcher, product-manager, ux-expert, product-owner
-- **Business & Process**: `business|process|workflow|cost|innovation|testing` → business-analyst, innovation-lead, test-strategist
-- **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
-- **Multi-role**: Complex topics automatically select 2-3 complementary roles
-- **Default**: `product-manager` if no clear match
-
-**Template Loading**: `bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/<role-name>.md"))`
-**Template Source**: `.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
-**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
-
-**Example**:
-```bash
-bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/system-architect.md"))
-bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/ui-designer.md"))
-```
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-### Structured Topic Processing → Role Analysis → Synthesis
-The command follows a structured three-phase approach with dedicated document types:
-
-**Phase 1: Framework Generation** ⚠️ COMMAND EXECUTION
-- **Role selection**: Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic)
-- **Call artifacts command**: Execute `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --roles "{role1,role2,role3}"` using SlashCommand tool
-- **Role-specific framework**: Generate framework with sections tailored to selected roles
-
-**Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution** ⚠️ PARALLEL AGENT ANALYSIS
-- **Parallel execution**: Multiple roles execute simultaneously for faster completion
-- **Independent agents**: Each role gets dedicated conceptual-planning-agent running in parallel
-- **Shared framework**: All roles reference the same topic framework for consistency
-- **Concurrent generation**: Role-specific analysis documents generated simultaneously
-- **Progress tracking**: Parallel agents update progress independently
-
-**Phase 3: Synthesis Generation** ⚠️ COMMAND EXECUTION
-- **Call synthesis command**: Execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` using SlashCommand tool
-
-## Implementation Standards
-
-### Simplified Command Orchestration ⚠️ STREAMLINED
-Auto command coordinates independent specialized commands:
-
-**Command Sequence**:
-1. **Role Selection**: Auto-select 2-3 relevant roles based on topic keywords
-2. **Generate Role-Specific Framework**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --roles "{role1,role2,role3}"`
-3. **Parallel Role Analysis**: Execute selected role agents in parallel, each reading their specific framework section
-4. **Generate Synthesis**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis`
-
-**SlashCommand Integration**:
-1. **artifacts command**: Called via SlashCommand tool with `--roles` parameter for role-specific framework generation
-2. **role agents**: Each agent reads its dedicated section in the role-specific framework
-3. **synthesis command**: Called via SlashCommand tool for final integration with role-targeted insights
-4. **Command coordination**: SlashCommand handles execution and validation
-
-**Role Selection Logic**:
-- **Technical**: `architecture|system|performance|database` → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **Product & UX**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|product|feature|experience` → ui-designer, ux-expert, product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile & Delivery**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery` → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation` → subject-matter-expert
-- **Auto-select**: 2-3 most relevant roles based on topic analysis
-
-### Simplified Processing Standards
-
-**Core Principles**:
-1. **Minimal preprocessing** - Only workflow-session.json and basic role selection
-2. **Agent autonomy** - Agents handle their own context and validation
-3. **Parallel execution** - Multiple agents can work simultaneously
-4. **Post-processing synthesis** - Integration happens after agent completion
-5. **TodoWrite control** - Progress tracking throughout all phases
-
-**Implementation Rules**:
-- **Maximum 3 roles**: Auto-selected based on simple keyword mapping
-- **No upfront validation**: Agents handle their own context requirements
-- **Parallel execution**: Each agent operates concurrently without dependencies
-- **Synthesis at end**: Integration only after all agents complete
-
-**Agent Self-Management** (Agents decide their own approach):
-- **Context gathering**: Agents determine what questions to ask
-- **Template usage**: Agents load and apply their own role templates
-- **Analysis depth**: Agents determine appropriate level of detail
-- **Documentation**: Agents create their own file structure and content
-
-### Session Management ⚠️ CRITICAL
-- **⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check for all `.workflow/.active-*` markers before role processing
-- **Multiple sessions support**: Different Claude instances can have different active brainstorming sessions
-- **User selection**: If multiple active sessions found, prompt user to select which one to work with
-- **Auto-session creation**: `WFS-[topic-slug]` only if no active session exists
-- **Session continuity**: MUST use selected active session for all role processing
-- **Context preservation**: Each role's context and agent output stored in session directory
-- **Session isolation**: Each session maintains independent brainstorming state and role assignments
-
-## Document Generation
-
-**Command Coordination Workflow**: artifacts → parallel role analysis → synthesis
-
-**Output Structure**: Coordinated commands generate framework, role analyses, and synthesis documents as defined in their respective command specifications.
-
-
-## Agent Prompt Templates
-
-### Task Agent Invocation Template
-
 
 ```bash
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: {role-name} perspective for {topic}
-
-     ## Role Assignment
-     **ASSIGNED_ROLE**: {role-name}
-     **TOPIC**: {user-provided-topic}
-     **OUTPUT_LOCATION**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/
-
-     ## Execution Instructions
-     [FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-     ### Flow Control Steps
-     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these pre_analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
-
-     1. **load_topic_framework**
-        - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-        - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'Topic framework not found')
-        - Output: topic_framework
-
-     2. **load_role_template**
-        - Action: Load {role-name} planning template
-        - Command: bash($(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"))
-        - Output: role_template
-
-     3. **load_session_metadata**
-        - Action: Load session metadata and topic description
-        - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')
-        - Output: session_metadata
-
-     ### Implementation Context
-     **Topic Framework**: Use loaded topic-framework.md for structured analysis
-     **Role Focus**: {role-name} domain expertise and perspective
-     **Analysis Type**: Address framework discussion points from role perspective
-     **Template Framework**: Combine role template with topic framework structure
-     **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing all topic framework points
-
-     ### Session Context
-     **Workflow Directory**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/
-     **Output Directory**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/
-     **Session JSON**: .workflow/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json
-
-     ### Dependencies & Context
-     **Topic**: {user-provided-topic}
-     **Role Template**: "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md"
-     **User Requirements**: To be gathered through interactive questioning
-
-     ## Completion Requirements
-     1. Execute all flow control steps in sequence (load topic framework, role template, session metadata)
-     2. **Address Topic Framework**: Respond to all discussion points in topic-framework.md from role perspective
-     3. Apply role template guidelines within topic framework structure
-     4. Generate structured role analysis addressing framework points
-     5. Create single comprehensive deliverable in OUTPUT_LOCATION:
-        - analysis.md (structured analysis addressing all topic framework points with role-specific insights)
-     6. Include framework reference: @../topic-framework.md in analysis.md
-     7. Update workflow-session.json with completion status",
-     description="Execute {role-name} brainstorming analysis")
+/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "<topic>" [--count N] [--style-skill package-name]
 ```
 
-### Parallel Role Agent调用示例
+**Recommended Structured Format**:
 ```bash
-# Execute multiple roles in parallel using single message with multiple Task calls
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: system-architect perspective for {topic}...",
-     description="Execute system-architect brainstorming analysis")
-
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: ui-designer perspective for {topic}...",
-     description="Execute ui-designer brainstorming analysis")
-
-Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
-     prompt="Execute brainstorming analysis: security-expert perspective for {topic}...",
-     description="Execute security-expert brainstorming analysis")
+/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "GOAL: [objective] SCOPE: [boundaries] CONTEXT: [background]" [--count N] [--style-skill package-name]
 ```
 
-### Direct Synthesis Process (Command-Driven)
-**Synthesis execution**: Use SlashCommand to execute `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` after role completion
+**Parameters**:
+- `topic` (required): Topic or challenge description (structured format recommended)
+- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles to select (default: 3, max: 9)
+- `--style-skill package-name` (optional): Style SKILL package to load for UI design (located at `.claude/skills/style-{package-name}/`)
 
+## 3-Phase Execution
 
-## TodoWrite Control Flow ⚠️ CRITICAL
+### Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation
 
-### Workflow Progress Tracking
-**MANDATORY**: Use Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite tool throughout entire brainstorming workflow:
+**Step 1: Dispatch** - Interactive framework generation via artifacts command
 
 ```javascript
-// Phase 1: Create initial todo list for command-coordinated brainstorming workflow
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {
-      content: "Initialize brainstorming session and detect active sessions",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Initializing brainstorming session"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Select roles based on topic keyword analysis",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Selecting roles for brainstorming analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute artifacts command with selected roles for role-specific framework",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Generating role-specific topic framework"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute [role-1] analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL] addressing framework",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing [role-1] structured framework analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute [role-2] analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL] addressing framework",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing [role-2] structured framework analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute synthesis command using SlashCommand for final integration",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing synthesis command for integrated analysis"
-    }
-  ]
-});
-
-// Phase 2: Update status as workflow progresses - ONLY ONE task should be in_progress at a time
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {
-      content: "Initialize brainstorming session and detect active sessions",
-      status: "completed",  // Mark completed preprocessing
-      activeForm: "Initializing brainstorming session"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Select roles for topic analysis and create workflow-session.json",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Mark current task as in_progress
-      activeForm: "Selecting roles and creating session metadata"
-    },
-    // ... other tasks remain pending
-  ]
-});
-
-// Phase 3: Parallel agent execution tracking
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    // ... previous completed tasks
-    {
-      content: "Execute system-architect analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
-      activeForm: "Executing system-architect brainstorming analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute ui-designer analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
-      activeForm: "Executing ui-designer brainstorming analysis"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute security-expert analysis [conceptual-planning-agent] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Executing in parallel
-      activeForm: "Executing security-expert brainstorming analysis"
-    }
-  ]
-});
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"{topic}\" --count {N}")
 ```
 
-**TodoWrite Integration Rules**:
-1. **Create initial todos**: All workflow phases at start
-2. **Mark in_progress**: Multiple parallel tasks can be in_progress simultaneously
-3. **Update immediately**: After each task completion
-4. **Track agent execution**: Include [agent-type] and [FLOW_CONTROL] markers for parallel agents
-5. **Final synthesis**: Mark synthesis as in_progress only after all parallel agents complete
+**What It Does**:
+- Topic analysis: Extract challenges, generate task-specific questions
+- Role selection: Recommend count+2 roles, user selects via AskUserQuestion
+- Role questions: Generate 3-4 questions per role, collect user decisions
+- Conflict resolution: Detect and resolve cross-role conflicts
+- Guidance generation: Transform Q&A to declarative guidance-specification.md
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- **⚠️ Memory Check**: If `selected_roles[]` already in conversation memory from previous load, skip file read
+- Extract: `selected_roles[]` from workflow-session.json (if not in memory)
+- Extract: `session_id` from workflow-session.json (if not in memory)
+- Verify: guidance-specification.md exists
+
+**Validation**:
+- guidance-specification.md created with confirmed decisions
+- workflow-session.json contains selected_roles[] (metadata only, no content duplication)
+- Session directory `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/` exists
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "  → Topic analysis and question generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing topic"},
+  {"content": "  → Role selection and user confirmation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Selecting roles"},
+  {"content": "  → Role questions and user decisions", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Collecting role questions"},
+  {"content": "  → Conflict detection and resolution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Guidance specification generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating guidance"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** artifacts' 5 internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 1.1-1.5** sequentially
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 1 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 1**: Auto-continue to Phase 2 (parallel role agent execution)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis Execution
+
+**For Each Selected Role**:
+```bash
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+[FLOW_CONTROL]
+
+Execute {role-name} analysis for existing topic framework
+
+## Context Loading
+ASSIGNED_ROLE: {role-name}
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/{role}/
+TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. load_topic_framework → .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md
+2. load_role_template → ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md
+3. load_session_metadata → .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json
+4. load_style_skill (ui-designer only, if style_skill_package) → .claude/skills/style-{style_skill_package}/
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+**Primary Reference**: Original user prompt from workflow-session.json is authoritative
+**Framework Source**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from {role-name} perspective
+**Role Focus**: {role-name} domain expertise aligned with user intent
+**Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
+**Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
+
+## Expected Deliverables
+1. **analysis.md** (optionally with analysis-{slug}.md sub-documents)
+2. **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md
+3. **User Intent Alignment**: Validate against session_context
+
+## Completion Criteria
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with {role-name} expertise
+- Provide actionable recommendations from {role-name} perspective within analysis files
+- All output files MUST start with `analysis` prefix (no recommendations.md or other naming)
+- Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
+- Update workflow-session.json with completion status
+"
+```
+
+**Parallel Dispatch**:
+- Launch N agents simultaneously (one message with multiple Task calls)
+- Each agent task **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- All agents execute concurrently, each attaching their own analysis sub-tasks
+- Each agent operates independently reading same guidance-specification.md
+
+**Input**:
+- `selected_roles[]` from Phase 1
+- `session_id` from Phase 1
+- guidance-specification.md path
+
+**Validation**:
+- Each role creates `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/analysis.md`
+- Optionally with `analysis-{slug}.md` sub-documents (max 5)
+- **File pattern**: `analysis*.md` for globbing
+- **FORBIDDEN**: `recommendations.md` or any non-`analysis` prefixed files
+- All N role analyses completed
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 agents dispatched - tasks attached in parallel)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Execute product-manager analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing product-manager analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Multiple Task dispatches **attach** N role analysis tasks simultaneously. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks in parallel.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.1-2.N** concurrently
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 parallel tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 2**: Auto-continue to Phase 3 (synthesis)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
+
+**Step 3: Dispatch** - Synthesis integration via synthesis command
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis --session {sessionId}")
+```
+
+**What It Does**:
+- Load original user intent from workflow-session.json
+- Read all role analysis.md files
+- Integrate role insights into synthesis-specification.md
+- Validate alignment with user's original objectives
+
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Validation**:
+- `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md` exists
+- Synthesis references all role analyses
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"},
+  {"content": "  → Load role analysis files", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading role analyses"},
+  {"content": "  → Integrate insights across roles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Integrating insights"},
+  {"content": "  → Generate synthesis specification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** synthesis' internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+Brainstorming complete for session: {sessionId}
+Roles analyzed: {count}
+Synthesis: .workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md
+
+✅ Next Steps:
+1. /workflow:concept-clarify --session {sessionId}  # Optional refinement
+2. /workflow:plan --session {sessionId}  # Generate implementation plan
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Pattern
+
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for parallel brainstorming workflow with interactive framework generation and concurrent role analysis.
+
+### Key Principles
+
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand/Task dispatched):
+   - Sub-command's or agent's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Phase 1: `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` attaches 5 internal tasks (Phase 1.1-1.5)
+   - Phase 2: Multiple `Task(conceptual-planning-agent)` calls attach N role analysis tasks simultaneously
+   - Phase 3: `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` attaches 3 internal tasks (Phase 3.1-3.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks (sequentially for Phase 1, 3; in parallel for Phase 2)
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 1.1-1.5 collapse to "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation: completed"
+   - Phase 2: Multiple role tasks collapse to "Execute parallel role analysis: completed"
+   - Phase 3: Synthesis tasks collapse to "Execute synthesis integration: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase 1 dispatched (artifacts tasks ATTACHED) → Artifacts sub-tasks executed → Phase 1 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 2 dispatched (N role tasks ATTACHED in parallel) → Role analyses executed concurrently → Phase 2 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 3 dispatched (synthesis tasks ATTACHED) → Synthesis sub-tasks executed → Phase 3 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Workflow complete.
+
+### Brainstorming Workflow Specific Features
+
+- **Phase 1**: Interactive framework generation with user Q&A (SlashCommand attachment)
+- **Phase 2**: Parallel role analysis execution with N concurrent agents (Task agent attachments)
+- **Phase 3**: Cross-role synthesis integration (SlashCommand attachment)
+- **Dynamic Role Count**: `--count N` parameter determines number of Phase 2 parallel tasks (default: 3, max: 9)
+- **Mixed Execution**: Sequential (Phase 1, 3) and Parallel (Phase 2) task execution
+
+
+## Input Processing
+
+**Count Parameter Parsing**:
+```javascript
+// Extract --count from user input
+IF user_input CONTAINS "--count":
+    EXTRACT count_value FROM "--count N" pattern
+    IF count_value > 9:
+        count_value = 9  // Cap at maximum 9 roles
+ELSE:
+    count_value = 3  // Default to 3 roles
+
+// Pass to artifacts command
+EXECUTE: /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts "{topic}" --count {count_value}
+```
+
+**Style-Skill Parameter Parsing**:
+```javascript
+// Extract --style-skill from user input
+IF user_input CONTAINS "--style-skill":
+    EXTRACT style_skill_name FROM "--style-skill package-name" pattern
+
+    // Validate SKILL package exists
+    skill_path = ".claude/skills/style-{style_skill_name}/SKILL.md"
+    IF file_exists(skill_path):
+        style_skill_package = style_skill_name
+        style_reference_path = ".workflow/reference_style/{style_skill_name}"
+        echo("✓ Style SKILL package found: style-{style_skill_name}")
+        echo("  Design reference: {style_reference_path}")
+    ELSE:
+        echo("⚠ WARNING: Style SKILL package not found: {style_skill_name}")
+        echo("  Expected location: {skill_path}")
+        echo("  Continuing without style reference...")
+        style_skill_package = null
+ELSE:
+    style_skill_package = null
+    echo("No style-skill specified, ui-designer will use default workflow")
+
+// Store for Phase 2 ui-designer context
+CONTEXT_VARS:
+    - style_skill_package: {style_skill_package}
+    - style_reference_path: {style_reference_path}
+```
+
+**Topic Structuring**:
+1. **Already Structured** → Pass directly to artifacts
+   ```
+   User: "GOAL: Build platform SCOPE: 100 users CONTEXT: Real-time"
+   → Pass as-is to artifacts
+   ```
+
+2. **Simple Text** → Pass directly (artifacts handles structuring)
+   ```
+   User: "Build collaboration platform"
+   → artifacts will analyze and structure
+   ```
+
+## Session Management
+
+**⚡ FIRST ACTION**: Check `.workflow/active/` for existing sessions before Phase 1
+
+**Multiple Sessions Support**:
+- Different Claude instances can have different brainstorming sessions
+- If multiple sessions found, prompt user to select
+- If single session found, use it
+- If no session exists, create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
+
+**Session Continuity**:
+- MUST use selected session for all phases
+- Each role's context stored in session directory
+- Session isolation: Each session maintains independent state
+
+## Output Structure
+
+**Phase 1 Output**:
+- `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md` (framework content)
+- `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/workflow-session.json` (metadata: selected_roles[], topic, timestamps, style_skill_package)
+
+**Phase 2 Output**:
+- `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/analysis.md` (one per role)
+- `.superdesign/design_iterations/` (ui-designer artifacts, if --style-skill provided)
+
+**Phase 3 Output**:
+- `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md` (integrated analysis)
+
+**⚠️ Storage Separation**: Guidance content in .md files, metadata in .json (no duplication)
+**⚠️ Style References**: When --style-skill provided, workflow-session.json stores style_skill_package name, ui-designer loads from `.claude/skills/style-{package-name}/`
+
+## Available Roles
+
+- data-architect (数据架构师)
+- product-manager (产品经理)
+- product-owner (产品负责人)
+- scrum-master (敏捷教练)
+- subject-matter-expert (领域专家)
+- system-architect (系统架构师)
+- test-strategist (测试策略师)
+- ui-designer (UI 设计师)
+- ux-expert (UX 专家)
+
+**Role Selection**: Handled by artifacts command (intelligent recommendation + user selection)
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Role selection failure**: artifacts defaults to product-manager with explanation
+- **Agent execution failure**: Agent-specific retry with minimal dependencies
+- **Template loading issues**: Agent handles graceful degradation
+- **Synthesis conflicts**: Synthesis highlights disagreements without resolution
 
 ## Reference Information
 
-### Structured Processing Schema
-Each role processing follows structured framework pattern:
-- **topic_framework**: Structured discussion framework document
-- **role**: Selected planning role name with framework reference
-- **agent**: Dedicated conceptual-planning-agent instance
-- **structured_analysis**: Agent addresses all framework discussion points
-- **output**: Role-specific analysis.md addressing topic framework structure
+**File Structure**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/
+├── workflow-session.json              # Session metadata ONLY
+└── .brainstorming/
+    ├── guidance-specification.md      # Framework (Phase 1)
+    ├── {role}/
+    │   ├── analysis.md                # Main document (with optional @references)
+    │   └── analysis-{slug}.md         # Section documents (max 5)
+    └── synthesis-specification.md     # Integration (Phase 3)
+```
 
-### File Structure Reference
-**Architecture**: @~/.claude/workflows/workflow-architecture.md
-**Role Templates**: @~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/
+**Template Source**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/`
 
-### Execution Integration
-Command coordination model: artifacts command → parallel role analysis → synthesis command
-
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Role selection failure**: Default to `product-manager` with explanation
-- **Agent execution failure**: Agent-specific retry with minimal dependencies
-- **Template loading issues**: Agent handles graceful degradation
-- **Synthesis conflicts**: Synthesis agent highlights disagreements without resolution
-
-## Quality Standards
-
-### Agent Autonomy Excellence
-- **Single role focus**: Each agent handles exactly one role independently
-- **Self-contained execution**: Agent manages own context, validation, and output
-- **Parallel processing**: Multiple agents can execute simultaneously
-- **Complete ownership**: Agent produces entire role-specific analysis package
-
-### Minimal Coordination Excellence
-- **Lightweight handoff**: Only topic and role assignment provided
-- **Agent self-management**: Agents handle their own workflow and validation
-- **Concurrent operation**: No inter-agent dependencies enabling parallel execution
-- **Reference-based synthesis**: Post-processing integration without content duplication
-- **TodoWrite orchestration**: Progress tracking and workflow control throughout entire process

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-squeeze.md

@@ -1,258 +0,0 @@
----
-name: auto-squeeze
-description: Orchestrate 3-phase brainstorming workflow by executing commands sequentially
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "<topic>"
-argument-hint: "topic or challenge description for coordinated brainstorming"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Build real-time collaboration feature"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Optimize database performance for millions of users"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:auto-squeeze "Implement secure authentication system"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# Workflow Brainstorm Auto-Squeeze Command
-
-## Coordinator Role
-
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute brainstorming commands in sequence (artifacts → roles → synthesis), auto-select relevant roles, and ensure complete brainstorming workflow execution.
-
-**Execution Flow**:
-1. Initialize TodoWrite → Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) → Validate framework → Update TodoWrite
-2. Select 2-3 relevant roles → Display selection → Execute Phase 2 (role analyses) → Update TodoWrite
-3. Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) → Validate outputs → Return summary
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
-2. **Auto-Select Roles**: Analyze topic keywords to select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
-3. **Display Selection**: Show selected roles to user before execution
-4. **Sequential Execution**: Execute role commands one by one, not in parallel
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until synthesis completes
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every command completion
-
-## 3-Phase Execution
-
-### Phase 1: Framework Generation
-
-**Step 1.1: Role Selection**
-Auto-select 2-3 roles based on topic keywords (see Role Selection Logic below)
-
-**Step 1.2: Generate Role-Specific Framework**
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"[topic]\" --roles \"[role1,role2,role3]\"")`
-
-**Input**: Selected roles from step 1.1
-
-**Parse Output**:
-- Verify topic-framework.md created with role-specific sections
-
-**Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md` exists
-- Contains sections for each selected role
-- Includes cross-role integration points
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, mark "Display selected roles" as in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 2: Role Analysis Execution
-
-**Step 2.1: Role Selection**
-Use keyword analysis to auto-select 2-3 roles:
-
-**Role Selection Logic**:
-- **Technical/Architecture keywords**: `architecture|system|performance|database|api|backend|scalability`
-  → system-architect, data-architect, subject-matter-expert
-- **UI/UX keywords**: `user|ui|ux|interface|design|frontend|experience`
-  → ui-designer, ux-expert
-- **Product/Business keywords**: `product|feature|business|workflow|process|customer`
-  → product-manager, product-owner
-- **Agile/Delivery keywords**: `agile|sprint|scrum|team|collaboration|delivery`
-  → scrum-master, product-owner
-- **Domain Expertise keywords**: `domain|standard|compliance|expertise|regulation`
-  → subject-matter-expert
-- **Default**: product-manager (if no clear match)
-
-**Selection Rules**:
-- Maximum 3 roles
-- Select most relevant role first based on strongest keyword match
-- Include complementary perspectives (e.g., if system-architect selected, also consider security-expert)
-
-**Step 2.2: Display Selected Roles**
-Show selection to user before execution:
-```
-Selected roles for analysis:
-- ui-designer (UI/UX perspective)
-- system-architect (Technical architecture)
-- security-expert (Security considerations)
-```
-
-**Step 2.3: Execute Role Commands Sequentially**
-Execute each selected role command one by one:
-
-**Commands**:
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:system-architect")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:data-architect")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-manager")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:product-owner")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert")`
-- `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:test-strategist")`
-
-**Validation** (after each role):
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md` exists
-- Contains role-specific analysis
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark each role task completed after execution, start next role as in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis")`
-
-**Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md` exists
-- Contains cross-references to role analyses using @ notation
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
-
-**Return to User**:
-```
-Brainstorming complete for topic: [topic]
-Framework: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md
-Roles analyzed: [role1], [role2], [role3]
-Synthesis: .workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md
-```
-
-## TodoWrite Pattern
-
-```javascript
-// Initialize (before Phase 1)
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// After displaying roles
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Generate topic framework", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating topic framework"},
-  {"content": "Display selected roles", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Displaying selected roles"},
-  {"content": "Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute security-expert analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing security-expert analysis"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"}
-]})
-
-// Continue pattern for each role and synthesis...
-```
-
-## Data Flow
-
-```
-User Input (topic)
-    ↓
-Role Selection (analyze topic keywords)
-    ↓ Output: 2-3 selected roles (e.g., ui-designer, system-architect, security-expert)
-    ↓
-Phase 1: artifacts "topic" --roles "role1,role2,role3"
-    ↓ Input: topic + selected roles
-    ↓ Output: role-specific topic-framework.md
-    ↓
-Display: Show selected roles to user
-    ↓
-Phase 2: Execute each role command sequentially
-    ↓ Role 1 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓ Role 2 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓ Role 3 → reads role-specific section → analysis.md
-    ↓
-Phase 3: synthesis
-    ↓ Input: role-specific framework + all role analyses
-    ↓ Output: synthesis-report.md with role-targeted insights
-    ↓
-Return summary to user
-```
-
-**Session Context**: All commands use active brainstorming session, sharing:
-- Role-specific topic framework
-- Role-targeted analyses
-- Cross-role integration points
-- Synthesis with role-specific insights
-
-**Key Improvement**: Framework is generated with roles parameter, ensuring all discussion points are relevant to selected roles
-
-## Role Selection Examples
-
-### Example 1: UI-Focused Topic
-**Topic**: "Redesign user authentication interface"
-**Keywords detected**: user, interface, design
-**Selected roles**:
-- ui-designer (primary: UI/UX match)
-- ux-expert (secondary: user experience)
-- subject-matter-expert (complementary: auth standards)
-
-### Example 2: Architecture Topic
-**Topic**: "Design scalable microservices architecture"
-**Keywords detected**: architecture, scalable, system
-**Selected roles**:
-- system-architect (primary: architecture match)
-- data-architect (secondary: scalability/data)
-- subject-matter-expert (complementary: domain expertise)
-
-### Example 3: Agile Delivery Topic
-**Topic**: "Optimize team sprint planning and delivery process"
-**Keywords detected**: sprint, team, delivery, process
-**Selected roles**:
-- scrum-master (primary: agile process match)
-- product-owner (secondary: backlog/delivery focus)
-- product-manager (complementary: product strategy)
-
-## Error Handling
-
-- **Framework Generation Failure**: Stop workflow, report error, do not proceed to role selection
-- **Role Analysis Failure**: Log failure, continue with remaining roles, note in final summary
-- **Synthesis Failure**: Retry once, if still fails report partial completion with available analyses
-- **Session Error**: Report session issue, prompt user to check session status
-
-## Output Structure
-
-```
-.workflow/[session]/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Phase 1 output
-├── [role1]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 1)
-├── [role2]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 2)
-├── [role3]/
-│   └── analysis.md            # Phase 2 output (role 3)
-└── synthesis-report.md        # Phase 3 output
-```
-
-## Coordinator Checklist
-
-✅ Initialize TodoWrite with framework + display + N roles + synthesis tasks
-✅ Execute Phase 1 (artifacts) immediately
-✅ Validate topic-framework.md exists
-✅ Analyze topic keywords for role selection
-✅ Auto-select 2-3 most relevant roles (max 3)
-✅ Display selected roles to user with rationale
-✅ Execute each role command sequentially
-✅ Validate each role's analysis.md after execution
-✅ Update TodoWrite after each role completion
-✅ Execute Phase 3 (synthesis) after all roles complete
-✅ Validate synthesis-report.md exists
-✅ Return summary with all generated files

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/data-architect.md

@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
 ---
 name: data-architect
-description: Generate or update data-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect [topic]
+description: Generate or update data-architect/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for data architecture perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "user analytics data pipeline"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:data-architect "real-time data processing system"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 📊 **Data Architect Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating data-architect/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from data architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating data-architect/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from data architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Data Architecture Focus**: Data models, pipelines, governance, and analytics perspective
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -27,17 +22,37 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Data Quality Management**: Data accuracy, completeness, and consistency
 - **Analytics and Insights**: Data analysis and business intelligence solutions
 
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Canonical Data Model - Source of Truth)**
+- **Canonical Data Model**: The authoritative, system-wide data schema representing domain entities and relationships
+- **Entity-Relationship Design**: Defining entities, attributes, relationships, and constraints
+- **Data Normalization & Optimization**: Ensuring data integrity, reducing redundancy, and optimizing storage
+- **Database Schema Design**: Physical database structures, indexes, partitioning strategies
+- **Data Pipeline Architecture**: ETL/ELT processes, data warehousing, and analytics pipelines
+- **Data Governance**: Data quality standards, retention policies, and compliance requirements
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **API Data Contracts**: Public-facing request/response schemas exposed by APIs → Defers to **API Designer**
+- **System Integration Patterns**: How services communicate at the macro level → Defers to **System Architect**
+- **UI Data Presentation**: How data is displayed to users → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO API Designer**: Provides canonical data model that API Designer translates into public API data contracts (as projection/view)
+- **TO System Architect**: Provides data flow requirements and storage constraints to inform system design
+- **FROM System Architect**: Receives system-level integration requirements and scalability constraints
+
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +87,13 @@ Execute data-architect analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: data-architect
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +103,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from data architecture perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from data architecture perspective
 **Role Focus**: Data models, pipelines, governance, analytics platforms
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive data architecture analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with data architecture expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with data architecture expertise
 - Provide data model designs, pipeline architectures, and governance strategies
 - Include scalability, performance, and quality considerations
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +136,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +163,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +172,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Data Architect Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Data Architecture perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with data architecture expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with data architecture expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Data architecture perspective on requirements]
@@ -193,13 +208,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "data_architect": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/data-architect/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Data architecture insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
-- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-manager.md

@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
 ---
 name: product-manager
-description: Generate or update product-manager/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager [topic]
+description: Generate or update product-manager/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for product management perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-manager "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🎯 **Product Manager Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating product-manager/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from product strategy perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating product-manager/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from product strategy perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Product Strategy Focus**: User needs, business value, and market positioning
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,12 +27,12 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +67,13 @@ Execute product-manager analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: product-manager
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +83,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from product strategy perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from product strategy perspective
 **Role Focus**: User value, business impact, market positioning, product strategy
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive product strategy analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with product management expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with product management expertise
 - Provide actionable business strategies and user value propositions
 - Include market analysis and competitive positioning insights
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +143,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Product Manager Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Product Strategy perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with product management expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with product management expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Product strategy perspective on user needs and requirements]
@@ -193,13 +188,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "product_manager": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-manager/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Product strategy insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/product-owner.md

@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
 ---
 name: product-owner
-description: Generate or update product-owner/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner [topic]
+description: Generate or update product-owner/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for product ownership perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:product-owner "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🎯 **Product Owner Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating product-owner/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating product-owner/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Product Backlog Focus**: Feature prioritization, user stories, and acceptance criteria
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,12 +27,12 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +67,13 @@ Execute product-owner analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: product-owner
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +83,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from product backlog and feature prioritization perspective
 **Role Focus**: Backlog management, stakeholder alignment, feature prioritization, acceptance criteria
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive product ownership analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with product ownership expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with product ownership expertise
 - Provide actionable user stories and acceptance criteria definitions
 - Include feature prioritization and stakeholder alignment strategies
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +143,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Product Owner Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Product Backlog & Feature Prioritization perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with product ownership expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with product ownership expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [User story formulation and backlog refinement perspective]
@@ -193,13 +188,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "product_owner": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/product-owner/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Product ownership insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/scrum-master.md

@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
 ---
 name: scrum-master
-description: Generate or update scrum-master/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master [topic]
+description: Generate or update scrum-master/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for Agile process perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:scrum-master "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🎯 **Scrum Master Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating scrum-master/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from agile process and team collaboration perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating scrum-master/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from agile process and team collaboration perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Agile Process Focus**: Sprint planning, team dynamics, and delivery optimization
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,12 +27,12 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +67,13 @@ Execute scrum-master analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: scrum-master
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +83,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from agile process and team collaboration perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from agile process and team collaboration perspective
 **Role Focus**: Sprint planning, team dynamics, process optimization, delivery management
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive agile process analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with scrum mastery expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with scrum mastery expertise
 - Provide actionable sprint planning and team facilitation strategies
 - Include process optimization and impediment removal insights
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +143,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Scrum Master Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Agile Process & Team Collaboration perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with scrum mastery expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with scrum mastery expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Sprint planning and iteration breakdown perspective]
@@ -193,13 +188,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "scrum_master": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/scrum-master/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Agile process insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/subject-matter-expert.md

@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
 ---
 name: subject-matter-expert
-description: Generate or update subject-matter-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert [topic]
+description: Generate or update subject-matter-expert/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for domain expertise perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:subject-matter-expert "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🎯 **Subject Matter Expert Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from domain knowledge and technical expertise perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating subject-matter-expert/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from domain knowledge and technical expertise perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Domain Expertise Focus**: Deep technical knowledge, industry standards, and best practices
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -32,12 +27,12 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +67,13 @@ Execute subject-matter-expert analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: subject-matter-expert
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +83,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from domain expertise and technical standards perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from domain expertise and technical standards perspective
 **Role Focus**: Domain knowledge, technical standards, risk assessment, knowledge transfer
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive domain expertise analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with subject matter expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with subject matter expertise
 - Provide actionable technical standards and best practices recommendations
 - Include risk assessment and compliance considerations
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +143,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +152,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # Subject Matter Expert Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: Domain Expertise & Technical Standards perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with subject matter expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with subject matter expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [Domain-specific requirements and industry standards perspective]
@@ -193,13 +188,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "subject_matter_expert": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/subject-matter-expert/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Domain expertise insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md

@@ -1,500 +1,398 @@
 ---
 name: synthesis
-description: Generate synthesis-specification.md from topic-framework and role analyses with @ references
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
-argument-hint: "no arguments required - synthesizes existing framework and role analyses"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis
-allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*)
+description: Clarify and refine role analyses through intelligent Q&A and targeted updates with synthesis agent
+argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
 ---
 
-## 🧩 **Synthesis Document Generator**
+## Overview
 
-### Core Function
-**Specialized command for generating synthesis-specification.md** that integrates topic-framework.md and all role analysis.md files using @ reference system. Creates comprehensive implementation specification with cross-role insights.
+Six-phase workflow to eliminate ambiguities and enhance conceptual depth in role analyses:
 
-**Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically detects which roles participated in brainstorming by scanning for `*/analysis.md` files. Synthesizes only actual participating roles, not predefined lists.
+**Phase 1-2**: Session detection → File discovery → Path preparation
+**Phase 3A**: Cross-role analysis agent → Generate recommendations
+**Phase 4**: User selects enhancements → User answers clarifications (via AskUserQuestion)
+**Phase 5**: Parallel update agents (one per role)
+**Phase 6**: Context package update → Metadata update → Completion report
 
-### Primary Capabilities
-- **Dynamic Role Discovery**: Automatically identifies participating roles at runtime
-- **Framework Integration**: Reference topic-framework.md discussion points across all discovered roles
-- **Role Analysis Integration**: Consolidate all discovered role/analysis.md files using @ references
-- **Cross-Framework Comparison**: Compare how each participating role addressed framework discussion points
-- **@ Reference System**: Create structured references to source documents
-- **Update Detection**: Smart updates when new role analyses are added
-- **Flexible Participation**: Supports any subset of available roles (1 to 9+)
+All user interactions use AskUserQuestion tool (max 4 questions per call, multi-round).
 
-### Document Integration Model
-**Three-Document Reference System**:
-1. **topic-framework.md** → Structured discussion framework (input)
-2. **[role]/analysis.md** → Role-specific analyses addressing framework (input)
-3. **synthesis-specification.md** → Complete integrated specification (output)
+**Document Flow**:
+- Input: `[role]/analysis*.md`, `guidance-specification.md`, session metadata
+- Output: Updated `[role]/analysis*.md` with Enhancements + Clarifications sections
 
-## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
+---
 
-### ⚠️ Direct Execution by Main Claude
-**Execution Model**: Main Claude directly executes this command without delegating to sub-agents.
+## Quick Reference
 
-**Rationale**:
-- **Full Context Access**: Avoids context transmission loss that occurs with Task tool delegation
-- **Complex Cognitive Analysis**: Leverages main Claude's complete reasoning capabilities for cross-role synthesis
-- **Tool Usage**: Combines Read/Write/Glob tools with main Claude's analytical intelligence
+### Phase Summary
 
-**DO NOT use Task tool** - Main Claude performs intelligent analysis directly while reading/writing files, ensuring no information loss from context passing.
+| Phase | Goal | Executor | Output |
+|-------|------|----------|--------|
+| 1 | Session detection | Main flow | session_id, brainstorm_dir |
+| 2 | File discovery | Main flow | role_analysis_paths |
+| 3A | Cross-role analysis | Agent | enhancement_recommendations |
+| 4 | User interaction | Main flow + AskUserQuestion | update_plan |
+| 5 | Document updates | Parallel agents | Updated analysis*.md |
+| 6 | Finalization | Main flow | context-package.json, report |
 
-### Phase 1: Document Discovery & Validation
-```bash
-# Detect active brainstorming session
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
-IF active_session EXISTS:
-    session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-ELSE:
-    ERROR: "No active brainstorming session found"
-    EXIT
+### AskUserQuestion Pattern
 
-# Validate required documents
-CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
-IF NOT EXISTS:
-    ERROR: "topic-framework.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:artifacts first"
-    EXIT
+```javascript
+// Enhancement selection (multi-select)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "请选择要应用的改进建议",
+    header: "改进选择",
+    multiSelect: true,
+    options: [
+      { label: "EP-001: API Contract", description: "添加详细的请求/响应 schema 定义" },
+      { label: "EP-002: User Intent", description: "明确用户需求优先级和验收标准" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+
+// Clarification questions (single-select, multi-round)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "MVP 阶段的核心目标是什么？",
+      header: "用户意图",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "快速验证", description: "最小功能集，快速上线获取反馈" },
+        { label: "技术壁垒", description: "完善架构，为长期发展打基础" },
+        { label: "功能完整", description: "覆盖所有规划功能，延迟上线" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
 ```
 
-### Phase 2: Role Analysis Discovery
-```bash
-# Dynamically discover available role analyses
-SCAN_DIRECTORY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-FIND_ANALYSES: [
-    Scan all subdirectories for */analysis.md files
-    Extract role names from directory names
-]
+---
 
-# Available roles (for reference, actual participation is dynamic):
-# - product-manager
-# - product-owner
-# - scrum-master
-# - system-architect
-# - ui-designer
-# - ux-expert
-# - data-architect
-# - subject-matter-expert
-# - test-strategist
+## Task Tracking
 
-LOAD_DOCUMENTS: {
-    "topic_framework": topic-framework.md,
-    "role_analyses": [dynamically discovered analysis.md files],
-    "participating_roles": [extract role names from discovered directories],
-    "existing_synthesis": synthesis-specification.md (if exists)
-}
-
-# Note: Not all roles participate in every brainstorming session
-# Only synthesize roles that actually produced analysis.md files
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Update Mechanism Check
-```bash
-# Check for existing synthesis
-IF synthesis-specification.md EXISTS:
-    SHOW current synthesis summary to user
-    ASK: "Synthesis exists. Do you want to:"
-    OPTIONS:
-      1. "Regenerate completely" → Create new synthesis
-      2. "Update with new analyses" → Integrate new role analyses
-      3. "Preserve existing" → Exit without changes
-ELSE:
-    CREATE new synthesis
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Synthesis Generation Process
-Initialize synthesis task tracking:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Validate topic-framework.md and role analyses availability", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating source documents"},
-  {"content": "Load topic framework discussion points structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Loading framework structure"},
-  {"content": "Cross-analyze role responses to each framework point", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Cross-analyzing framework responses"},
-  {"content": "Generate synthesis-specification.md with @ references", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis with references"},
-  {"content": "Update session metadata with synthesis completion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating session metadata"}
+  {"content": "Detect session and validate analyses", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Detecting session"},
+  {"content": "Discover role analysis file paths", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Discovering paths"},
+  {"content": "Execute analysis agent (cross-role analysis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing analysis"},
+  {"content": "Present enhancements via AskUserQuestion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Selecting enhancements"},
+  {"content": "Clarification questions via AskUserQuestion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Clarifying"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel update agents", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating documents"},
+  {"content": "Update context package and metadata", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Finalizing"}
 ]
 ```
 
-### Phase 5: Cross-Role Analysis Execution
+---
 
-**Dynamic Role Processing**: The number and types of roles are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered in Phase 2.
+## Execution Phases
 
-#### 5.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
-```pseudo
-# Iterate over dynamically discovered role analyses
-FOR each discovered_role IN participating_roles:
-    role_directory = brainstorm_dir + "/" + discovered_role
+### Phase 1: Discovery & Validation
 
-    # Load role analysis (required)
-    role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
+1. **Detect Session**: Use `--session` parameter or find `.workflow/active/WFS-*`
+2. **Validate Files**:
+   - `guidance-specification.md` (optional, warn if missing)
+   - `*/analysis*.md` (required, error if empty)
+3. **Load User Intent**: Extract from `workflow-session.json`
 
-    # Load optional artifacts if present
-    IF EXISTS(role_directory + "/recommendations.md"):
-        role_recommendations[discovered_role] = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md")
-    END IF
+### Phase 2: Role Discovery & Path Preparation
 
-    # Extract insights from analysis
-    role_insights[discovered_role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
-    role_recommendations[discovered_role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
-    role_concerns[discovered_role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
-    role_diagrams[discovered_role] = identify_diagrams_and_visuals(role_analysis)
-END FOR
+**Main flow prepares file paths for Agent**:
 
-# Log participating roles for metadata
-participating_role_count = COUNT(participating_roles)
-participating_role_names = participating_roles
+1. **Discover Analysis Files**:
+   - Glob: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md`
+   - Supports: analysis.md + analysis-{slug}.md (max 5)
+
+2. **Extract Role Information**:
+   - `role_analysis_paths`: Relative paths
+   - `participating_roles`: Role names from directories
+
+3. **Pass to Agent**: session_id, brainstorm_dir, role_analysis_paths, participating_roles
+
+### Phase 3A: Analysis & Enhancement Agent
+
+**Agent executes cross-role analysis**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent, `
+## Agent Mission
+Analyze role documents, identify conflicts/gaps, generate enhancement recommendations
+
+## Input
+- brainstorm_dir: ${brainstorm_dir}
+- role_analysis_paths: ${role_analysis_paths}
+- participating_roles: ${participating_roles}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. load_session_metadata → Read workflow-session.json
+2. load_role_analyses → Read all analysis files
+3. cross_role_analysis → Identify consensus, conflicts, gaps, ambiguities
+4. generate_recommendations → Format as EP-001, EP-002, ...
+
+## Output Format
+[
+  {
+    "id": "EP-001",
+    "title": "API Contract Specification",
+    "affected_roles": ["system-architect", "api-designer"],
+    "category": "Architecture",
+    "current_state": "High-level API descriptions",
+    "enhancement": "Add detailed contract definitions",
+    "rationale": "Enables precise implementation",
+    "priority": "High"
+  }
+]
+`)
 ```
 
-#### 5.2 Cross-Role Insight Analysis
-```pseudo
-# Consensus identification (across all participating roles)
-consensus_areas = identify_common_themes(role_insights)
-agreement_matrix = create_agreement_matrix(role_recommendations)
+### Phase 4: User Interaction
 
-# Disagreement analysis (track which specific roles disagree)
-disagreement_areas = identify_conflicting_views(role_insights)
-tension_points = analyze_role_conflicts(role_recommendations)
-FOR each conflict IN disagreement_areas:
-    conflict.dissenting_roles = identify_dissenting_roles(conflict)
-END FOR
+**All interactions via AskUserQuestion (Chinese questions)**
 
-# Innovation opportunity extraction
-innovation_opportunities = extract_breakthrough_ideas(role_insights)
-synergy_opportunities = identify_cross_role_synergies(role_insights)
+#### Step 1: Enhancement Selection
+
+```javascript
+// If enhancements > 4, split into multiple rounds
+const enhancements = [...]; // from Phase 3A
+const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
+
+for (let i = 0; i < enhancements.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+  const batch = enhancements.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
+
+  AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: `请选择要应用的改进建议 (第${Math.floor(i/BATCH_SIZE)+1}轮)`,
+      header: "改进选择",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: batch.map(ep => ({
+        label: `${ep.id}: ${ep.title}`,
+        description: `影响: ${ep.affected_roles.join(', ')} | ${ep.enhancement}`
+      }))
+    }]
+  })
+
+  // Store selections before next round
+}
+
+// User can also skip: provide "跳过" option
 ```
 
-#### 5.3 Priority and Decision Matrix Generation
-```pseudo
-# Create comprehensive evaluation matrix
-FOR each recommendation:
-    impact_score = calculate_business_impact(recommendation, role_insights)
-    feasibility_score = calculate_technical_feasibility(recommendation, role_insights)
-    effort_score = calculate_implementation_effort(recommendation, role_insights)
-    risk_score = calculate_associated_risks(recommendation, role_insights)
-    
-    priority_score = weighted_score(impact_score, feasibility_score, effort_score, risk_score)
-END FOR
+#### Step 2: Clarification Questions
 
-SORT recommendations BY priority_score DESC
+```javascript
+// Generate questions based on 9-category taxonomy scan
+// Categories: User Intent, Requirements, Architecture, UX, Feasibility, Risk, Process, Decisions, Terminology
+
+const clarifications = [...]; // from analysis
+const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
+
+for (let i = 0; i < clarifications.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+  const batch = clarifications.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
+  const currentRound = Math.floor(i / BATCH_SIZE) + 1;
+  const totalRounds = Math.ceil(clarifications.length / BATCH_SIZE);
+
+  AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: batch.map(q => ({
+      question: q.question,
+      header: q.category.substring(0, 12),
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: q.options.map(opt => ({
+        label: opt.label,
+        description: opt.description
+      }))
+    }))
+  })
+
+  // Store answers before next round
+}
 ```
 
-## 📊 **Output Specification**
+### Question Guidelines
 
-### Output Location
-The synthesis process creates **one consolidated document** that integrates all role perspectives:
+**Target**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
 
-```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework structure
-├── [role]/analysis.md          # Input: Role analyses (multiple)
-└── synthesis-specification.md  # ★ OUTPUT: Complete integrated specification
+**Question Structure**: `[跨角色分析发现] + [需要澄清的决策点]`
+**Option Structure**: `标签：[具体方案] + 说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]`
+
+**9-Category Taxonomy**:
+
+| Category | Focus | Example Question Pattern |
+|----------|-------|--------------------------|
+| User Intent | 用户目标 | "MVP阶段核心目标？" + 验证/壁垒/完整性 |
+| Requirements | 需求细化 | "功能优先级如何排序？" + 核心/增强/可选 |
+| Architecture | 架构决策 | "技术栈选择考量？" + 熟悉度/先进性/成熟度 |
+| UX | 用户体验 | "交互复杂度取舍？" + 简洁/丰富/渐进 |
+| Feasibility | 可行性 | "资源约束下的范围？" + 最小/标准/完整 |
+| Risk | 风险管理 | "风险容忍度？" + 保守/平衡/激进 |
+| Process | 流程规范 | "迭代节奏？" + 快速/稳定/灵活 |
+| Decisions | 决策确认 | "冲突解决方案？" + 方案A/方案B/折中 |
+| Terminology | 术语统一 | "统一使用哪个术语？" + 术语A/术语B |
+
+**Quality Rules**:
+
+**MUST Include**:
+- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+- ✅ 基于跨角色分析的具体发现
+- ✅ 选项包含业务影响说明
+- ✅ 解决实际的模糊点或冲突
+
+**MUST Avoid**:
+- ❌ 与角色分析无关的通用问题
+- ❌ 重复已在 artifacts 阶段确认的内容
+- ❌ 过于细节的实现级问题
+
+#### Step 3: Build Update Plan
+
+```javascript
+update_plan = {
+  "role1": {
+    "enhancements": ["EP-001", "EP-003"],
+    "clarifications": [
+      {"question": "...", "answer": "...", "category": "..."}
+    ]
+  },
+  "role2": {
+    "enhancements": ["EP-002"],
+    "clarifications": [...]
+  }
+}
 ```
 
-#### synthesis-specification.md Structure (Complete Specification)
+### Phase 5: Parallel Document Update Agents
 
-**Document Purpose**: Defines **"WHAT"** to build - comprehensive requirements and design blueprint.
-**Scope**: High-level features, requirements, and design specifications. Does NOT include executable task breakdown (that's IMPL_PLAN.md's responsibility).
+**Execute in parallel** (one agent per role):
+
+```javascript
+// Single message with multiple Task calls for parallelism
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent, `
+## Agent Mission
+Apply enhancements and clarifications to ${role} analysis
+
+## Input
+- role: ${role}
+- analysis_path: ${brainstorm_dir}/${role}/analysis.md
+- enhancements: ${role_enhancements}
+- clarifications: ${role_clarifications}
+- original_user_intent: ${intent}
+
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. load_current_analysis → Read analysis file
+2. add_clarifications_section → Insert Q&A section
+3. apply_enhancements → Integrate into relevant sections
+4. resolve_contradictions → Remove conflicts
+5. enforce_terminology → Align terminology
+6. validate_intent → Verify alignment with user intent
+7. write_updated_file → Save changes
+
+## Output
+Updated ${role}/analysis.md
+`)
+```
+
+**Agent Characteristics**:
+- **Isolation**: Each agent updates exactly ONE role (parallel safe)
+- **Dependencies**: Zero cross-agent dependencies
+- **Validation**: All updates must align with original_user_intent
+
+### Phase 6: Finalization
+
+#### Step 1: Update Context Package
+
+```javascript
+// Sync updated analyses to context-package.json
+const context_pkg = Read(".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/context-package.json")
+
+// Update guidance-specification if exists
+// Update synthesis-specification if exists
+// Re-read all role analysis files
+// Update metadata timestamps
+
+Write(context_pkg_path, JSON.stringify(context_pkg))
+```
+
+#### Step 2: Update Session Metadata
+
+```json
+{
+  "phases": {
+    "BRAINSTORM": {
+      "status": "clarification_completed",
+      "clarification_completed": true,
+      "completed_at": "timestamp",
+      "participating_roles": [...],
+      "clarification_results": {
+        "enhancements_applied": ["EP-001", "EP-002"],
+        "questions_asked": 3,
+        "categories_clarified": ["Architecture", "UX"],
+        "roles_updated": ["role1", "role2"]
+      },
+      "quality_metrics": {
+        "user_intent_alignment": "validated",
+        "ambiguity_resolution": "complete",
+        "terminology_consistency": "enforced"
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+#### Step 3: Completion Report
 
 ```markdown
-# [Topic] - Integrated Implementation Specification
+## ✅ Clarification Complete
 
-**Framework Reference**: @topic-framework.md | **Generated**: [timestamp] | **Session**: WFS-[topic-slug]
-**Source Integration**: All brainstorming role perspectives consolidated
-**Document Type**: Requirements & Design Specification (WHAT to build)
+**Enhancements Applied**: EP-001, EP-002, EP-003
+**Questions Answered**: 3/5
+**Roles Updated**: role1, role2, role3
 
-## Executive Summary
-Strategic overview with key insights, breakthrough opportunities, and implementation priorities.
-
-## Key Designs & Decisions
-### Core Architecture Diagram
-```mermaid
-graph TD
-    A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
-    B --> C[Component C]
+### Next Steps
+✅ PROCEED: `/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}`
 ```
-*Reference: @system-architect/analysis.md#architecture-diagram*
-
-### User Journey Map
-![User Journey](./assets/user-journey.png)
-*Reference: @ux-expert/analysis.md#user-journey*
-
-### Data Model Overview
-```mermaid
-erDiagram
-    USER ||--o{ ORDER : places
-    ORDER ||--|{ LINE-ITEM : contains
-```
-*Reference: @data-architect/analysis.md#data-model*
-
-### Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
-**ADR-01: [Decision Title]**
-- **Context**: Background and problem statement
-- **Decision**: Chosen approach
-- **Rationale**: Why this approach was selected
-- **Reference**: @system-architect/analysis.md#adr-01
-
-## Controversial Points & Alternatives
-| Point | Adopted Solution | Alternative Solution(s) | Decision Rationale | Dissenting Roles |
-|-------|------------------|-------------------------|--------------------| -----------------|
-| Authentication | JWT Token (@security-expert) | Session-Cookie (@system-architect) | Stateless API support for multi-platform | System Architect noted session performance benefits |
-| UI Framework | React (@ui-designer) | Vue.js (@subject-matter-expert) | Team expertise and ecosystem maturity | Subject Matter Expert preferred Vue for learning curve |
-
-*This section preserves decision context and rejected alternatives for future reference.*
-
-## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria
-### Functional Requirements
-| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Source | Priority | Acceptance | Dependencies |
-|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|----------|------------|--------------|
-| FR-01 | User authentication | Enable secure multi-platform access | @product-manager/analysis.md | High | User can login via email/password | None |
-| FR-02 | Data export | User-requested analytics feature | @product-owner/analysis.md | Medium | Export to CSV/JSON | FR-01 |
-
-### Non-Functional Requirements
-| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Target | Validation | Source |
-|----|-------------|-------------------|--------|------------|--------|
-| NFR-01 | Response time | UX research shows <200ms critical | <200ms | Load testing | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
-| NFR-02 | Data encryption | Compliance requirement | AES-256 | Security audit | @security-expert/analysis.md |
-
-### Business Requirements
-| ID | Description | Rationale Summary | Value | Success Metric | Source |
-|----|-------------|-------------------|-------|----------------|--------|
-| BR-01 | User retention | Market analysis shows engagement gap | High | 80% 30-day retention | @product-manager/analysis.md |
-| BR-02 | Revenue growth | Business case justification | High | 25% MRR increase | @product-owner/analysis.md |
-
-## Design Specifications
-### UI/UX Guidelines
-**Consolidated from**: @ui-designer/analysis.md, @ux-expert/analysis.md
-- Component specifications and interaction patterns
-- Visual design system and accessibility requirements
-- User flow and interface specifications
-
-### Architecture Design
-**Consolidated from**: @system-architect/analysis.md, @data-architect/analysis.md
-- System architecture and component interactions
-- Data flow and storage strategy
-- Technology stack decisions
-
-### Domain Expertise & Standards
-**Consolidated from**: @subject-matter-expert/analysis.md
-- Industry standards and best practices
-- Compliance requirements and regulations
-- Technical quality and domain-specific patterns
-
-## Process & Collaboration Concerns
-**Consolidated from**: @scrum-master/analysis.md, @product-owner/analysis.md
-
-### Team Capability Assessment
-| Required Skill | Current Level | Gap Analysis | Mitigation Strategy | Reference |
-|----------------|---------------|--------------|---------------------|-----------|
-| Kubernetes | Intermediate | Need advanced knowledge | Training + external consultant | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
-| React Hooks | Advanced | Team ready | None | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
-
-### Process Risks
-| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation | Owner |
-|------|--------|-------------|------------|-------|
-| Cross-team API dependency | High | Medium | Early API contract definition | @scrum-master/analysis.md |
-| UX-Dev alignment gap | Medium | High | Weekly design sync meetings | @ux-expert/analysis.md |
-
-### Collaboration Patterns
-- **Design-Dev Pairing**: UI Designer and Frontend Dev pair programming for complex interactions
-- **Architecture Reviews**: Weekly arch review for system-level decisions
-- **User Testing Cadence**: Bi-weekly UX testing sessions with real users
-- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#collaboration
-
-### Timeline Constraints
-- **Blocking Dependencies**: Project-X API must complete before Phase 2
-- **Resource Constraints**: Only 2 backend developers available in Q1
-- **External Dependencies**: Third-party OAuth provider integration timeline
-- **Reference**: @scrum-master/analysis.md#constraints
-
-## Implementation Roadmap (High-Level)
-### Development Phases
-**Phase 1** (0-3 months): Foundation and core features
-**Phase 2** (3-6 months): Advanced features and integrations
-**Phase 3** (6+ months): Optimization and innovation
-
-### Technical Guidelines
-- Development standards and code organization
-- Testing strategy and quality assurance
-- Deployment and monitoring approach
-
-### Feature Grouping (Epic-Level)
-- High-level feature grouping and prioritization
-- Epic-level dependencies and sequencing
-- Strategic milestones and release planning
-
-**Note**: Detailed task breakdown into executable work items is handled by `/workflow:plan` → `IMPL_PLAN.md`
-
-## Risk Assessment & Mitigation
-### Critical Risks Identified
-1. **Risk**: Description | **Mitigation**: Strategy
-2. **Risk**: Description | **Mitigation**: Strategy
-
-### Success Factors
-- Key factors for implementation success
-- Continuous monitoring requirements
-- Quality gates and validation checkpoints
 
 ---
-*Complete implementation specification consolidating all role perspectives into actionable guidance*
+
+## Output
+
+**Location**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis*.md`
+
+**Updated Structure**:
+```markdown
+## Clarifications
+### Session {date}
+- **Q**: {question} (Category: {category})
+  **A**: {answer}
+
+## {Existing Sections}
+{Refined content based on clarifications}
 ```
 
-## 🔄 **Session Integration**
+**Changes**:
+- User intent validated/corrected
+- Requirements more specific/measurable
+- Architecture with rationale
+- Ambiguities resolved, placeholders removed
+- Consistent terminology
 
-### Streamlined Status Synchronization
-Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
+---
 
-**Dynamic Role Participation**: The `participating_roles` and `roles_synthesized` values are determined at runtime based on actual analysis.md files discovered.
+## Quality Checklist
 
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "status": "completed",
-      "synthesis_completed": true,
-      "completed_at": "timestamp",
-      "participating_roles": ["<dynamically-discovered-role-1>", "<dynamically-discovered-role-2>", "..."],
-      "available_roles": ["product-manager", "product-owner", "scrum-master", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "data-architect", "subject-matter-expert", "test-strategist"],
-      "consolidated_output": {
-        "synthesis_specification": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md"
-      },
-      "synthesis_quality": {
-        "role_integration": "complete",
-        "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
-        "decision_transparency": "alternatives_documented",
-        "process_risks_identified": true,
-        "implementation_readiness": "ready"
-      },
-      "content_metrics": {
-        "roles_synthesized": "<COUNT(participating_roles)>",
-        "functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "non_functional_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "business_requirements": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "architecture_decisions": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "controversial_points": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "diagrams_included": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "process_risks": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "team_skill_gaps": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "implementation_phases": "<dynamic-count>",
-        "risk_factors_identified": "<dynamic-count>"
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
+**Content**:
+- ✅ All role analyses loaded/analyzed
+- ✅ Cross-role analysis (consensus, conflicts, gaps)
+- ✅ 9-category ambiguity scan
+- ✅ Questions prioritized
 
-**Example with actual values**:
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "status": "completed",
-      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", "ui-designer", "ux-expert", "scrum-master"],
-      "content_metrics": {
-        "roles_synthesized": 5,
-        "functional_requirements": 18,
-        "controversial_points": 2
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
+**Analysis**:
+- ✅ User intent validated
+- ✅ Cross-role synthesis complete
+- ✅ Ambiguities resolved
+- ✅ Terminology consistent
 
-## ✅ **Quality Assurance**
-
-### Required Synthesis Elements
-- [ ] Integration of all available role analyses with comprehensive coverage
-- [ ] **Key Designs & Decisions**: Architecture diagrams, user journey maps, ADRs documented
-- [ ] **Controversial Points**: Disagreement points, alternatives, and decision rationale captured
-- [ ] **Process Concerns**: Team capability gaps, process risks, collaboration patterns identified
-- [ ] Quantified priority recommendation matrix with evaluation criteria
-- [ ] Actionable implementation plan with phased approach
-- [ ] Comprehensive risk assessment with mitigation strategies
-
-### Synthesis Analysis Quality Standards
-- [ ] **Completeness**: Integrates all available role analyses without gaps
-- [ ] **Visual Clarity**: Key diagrams (architecture, data model, user journey) included via Mermaid or images
-- [ ] **Decision Transparency**: Documents not just decisions, but alternatives and why they were rejected
-- [ ] **Insight Generation**: Identifies cross-role patterns and deep insights
-- [ ] **Actionability**: Provides specific, executable recommendations with rationale
-- [ ] **Balance**: Considers all role perspectives, including process-oriented roles (Scrum Master)
-- [ ] **Forward-Looking**: Includes long-term strategic and innovation considerations
-
-### Output Validation Criteria
-- [ ] **Priority-Based**: Recommendations prioritized using multi-dimensional evaluation
-- [ ] **Context-Rich**: Each requirement includes rationale summary for immediate understanding
-- [ ] **Resource-Aware**: Team skill gaps and constraints explicitly documented
-- [ ] **Risk-Managed**: Both technical and process risks captured with mitigation strategies
-- [ ] **Measurable Success**: Clear success metrics and monitoring frameworks
-- [ ] **Clear Actions**: Specific next steps with assigned responsibilities and timelines
-
-### Integration Excellence Standards
-- [ ] **Cross-Role Synthesis**: Successfully identifies and documents role perspective conflicts
-- [ ] **No Role Marginalization**: Process, UX, and compliance concerns equally visible as functional requirements
-- [ ] **Strategic Coherence**: Recommendations form coherent strategic direction
-- [ ] **Implementation Readiness**: Plans detailed enough for immediate execution, with clear handoff to IMPL_PLAN.md
-- [ ] **Stakeholder Alignment**: Addresses needs and concerns of all key stakeholders
-- [ ] **Decision Traceability**: Every major decision traceable to source role analysis via @ references
-- [ ] **Continuous Improvement**: Establishes framework for ongoing optimization and learning
-
-## 🚀 **Recommended Next Steps**
-
-After synthesis completion, follow this recommended workflow:
-
-### Option 1: Standard Planning Workflow (Recommended)
-```bash
-# Step 1: Verify conceptual clarity (Quality Gate)
-/workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-# → Interactive Q&A (up to 5 questions) to clarify ambiguities in synthesis
-
-# Step 2: Proceed to action planning (after concept verification)
-/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}
-# → Generates IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json files
-
-# Step 3: Verify action plan quality (Quality Gate)
-/workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-# → Read-only analysis to catch issues before execution
-
-# Step 4: Start implementation
-/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
-```
-
-### Option 2: TDD Workflow
-```bash
-# Step 1: Verify conceptual clarity
-/workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-
-# Step 2: Generate TDD task chains (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR)
-/workflow:tdd-plan --session WFS-{session-id} "Feature description"
-
-# Step 3: Verify TDD plan quality
-/workflow:action-plan-verify --session WFS-{session-id}
-
-# Step 4: Execute TDD workflow
-/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
-```
-
-### Quality Gates Explained
-
-**`/workflow:concept-verify`** (Phase 2 - After Brainstorming):
-- **Purpose**: Detect and resolve conceptual ambiguities before detailed planning
-- **Time**: 10-20 minutes (interactive)
-- **Value**: Reduces downstream rework by 40-60%
-- **Output**: Updated synthesis-specification.md with clarifications
-
-**`/workflow:action-plan-verify`** (Phase 4 - After Planning):
-- **Purpose**: Validate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json consistency and completeness
-- **Time**: 5-10 minutes (read-only analysis)
-- **Value**: Prevents execution of flawed plans, saves 2-5 days
-- **Output**: Verification report with actionable recommendations
-
-### Skip Verification? (Not Recommended)
-
-If you want to skip verification and proceed directly:
-```bash
-/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}
-/workflow:execute --session WFS-{session-id}
-```
-
-⚠️ **Warning**: Skipping verification increases risk of late-stage issues and rework.
+**Documents**:
+- ✅ Clarifications section formatted
+- ✅ Sections reflect answers
+- ✅ No placeholders (TODO/TBD)
+- ✅ Valid Markdown

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/system-architect.md

@@ -1,21 +1,17 @@
 ---
 name: system-architect
-description: Generate or update system-architect/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect [topic]
+description: Generate or update system-architect/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for system architecture perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:system-architect "user authentication redesign"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🏗️ **System Architect Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating system-architect/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from system architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating system-architect/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from system architecture perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **Architecture Focus**: Technical architecture, scalability, and system design perspective
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
@@ -26,17 +22,36 @@ allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 - **Performance & Scalability**: Capacity planning and optimization strategies
 - **Integration Patterns**: System communication and data flow design
 
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Macro-Architecture)**
+- **System-Level Architecture**: Service boundaries, deployment topology, and system composition
+- **Cross-Service Communication Patterns**: Choosing between microservices/monolithic, event-driven/request-response, sync/async patterns
+- **Technology Stack Decisions**: Language, framework, database, and infrastructure choices
+- **Non-Functional Requirements**: Scalability, performance, availability, disaster recovery, and monitoring strategies
+- **Integration Planning**: How systems and services connect at the macro level (not specific API contracts)
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **API Contract Details**: Specific endpoint definitions, URL structures, HTTP methods → Defers to **API Designer**
+- **Data Schemas**: Detailed data model design and entity relationships → Defers to **Data Architect**
+- **UI/UX Design**: Interface design and user experience → Defers to **UX Expert** and **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO API Designer**: Provides architectural constraints (REST vs GraphQL, sync vs async) that define the API design space
+- **TO Data Architect**: Provides system-level data flow requirements and integration patterns
+- **FROM Data Architect**: Receives canonical data model to inform system integration design
+
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -63,20 +78,21 @@ ELSE:
 ```
 
 ### Phase 3: Agent Task Generation
-**Framework-Based Analysis** (when topic-framework.md exists):
+**Framework-Based Analysis** (when guidance-specification.md exists):
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
      prompt="Generate system architect analysis addressing topic framework
 
      ## Framework Integration Required
-     **MANDATORY**: Load and address topic-framework.md discussion points
-     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+     **MANDATORY**: Load and address guidance-specification.md discussion points
+     **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
      **Output Location**: {session.brainstorm_dir}/system-architect/analysis.md
 
      ## Analysis Requirements
-     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read topic-framework.md completely
+     1. **Load Topic Framework**: Read guidance-specification.md completely
      2. **Address Each Discussion Point**: Respond to all 5 framework sections from system architecture perspective
-     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../topic-framework.md
+     3. **Include Framework Reference**: Start analysis.md with @../guidance-specification.md
      4. **Technical Focus**: Emphasize scalability, architecture patterns, technology decisions
      5. **Structured Response**: Use framework structure for analysis organization
 
@@ -91,7 +107,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
      ```markdown
      # System Architect Analysis: [Topic]
 
-     **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md
+     **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md
      **Role Focus**: System Architecture and Technical Design
 
      ## Core Requirements Analysis
@@ -121,18 +137,19 @@ Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
 # For existing analysis updates
 IF update_mode = "incremental":
     Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         run_in_background=false,
          prompt="Update existing system architect analysis
 
          ## Current Analysis Context
          **Existing Analysis**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/system-architect/analysis.md
-         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/topic-framework.md
+         **Framework Reference**: @{session.brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md
 
          ## Update Requirements
          1. **Preserve Structure**: Maintain existing analysis structure
          2. **Add New Insights**: Integrate new technical insights and recommendations
          3. **Framework Alignment**: Ensure continued alignment with topic framework
          4. **Technical Updates**: Add new architecture patterns, technology considerations
-         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../topic-framework.md reference
+         5. **Maintain References**: Keep @../guidance-specification.md reference
 
          ## Update Instructions
          - Read existing analysis completely
@@ -147,15 +164,15 @@ IF update_mode = "incremental":
 
 ### Output Files
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
-├── topic-framework.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
+.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/.brainstorming/
+├── guidance-specification.md          # Input: Framework (if exists)
 └── system-architect/
     └── analysis.md            # ★ OUTPUT: Framework-based analysis
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Structure
 **Required Elements**:
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md (if framework exists)
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md (if framework exists)
 - **Role Focus**: System Architecture and Technical Design perspective
 - **5 Framework Sections**: Address each framework discussion point
 - **Technical Recommendations**: Architecture-specific insights and solutions
@@ -171,8 +188,8 @@ IF update_mode = "incremental":
 ### ⚠️ Session Management - FIRST STEP
 Session detection and selection:
 ```bash
-# Check for active sessions
-active_sessions=$(find .workflow -name ".active-*" 2>/dev/null)
+# Check for existing sessions
+existing_sessions=$(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
 if [ multiple_sessions ]; then
   prompt_user_to_select_session()
 else
@@ -264,7 +281,7 @@ TodoWrite tracking for two-step process:
 
 ### Output Location
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/system-architect/
+.workflow/active/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/system-architect/
 ├── analysis.md                 # Primary architecture analysis
 ├── architecture-design.md      # Detailed system design and diagrams
 ├── technology-stack.md         # Technology stack recommendations and justifications
@@ -325,7 +342,7 @@ Upon completion, update `workflow-session.json`:
       "system_architect": {
         "status": "completed",
         "completed_at": "timestamp",
-        "output_directory": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/system-architect/",
+        "output_directory": ".workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/system-architect/",
         "key_insights": ["scalability_bottleneck", "architecture_pattern", "technology_recommendation"]
       }
     }
@@ -369,4 +386,4 @@ System architect perspective provides:
 - [ ] **Resource Planning**: Resource requirements clearly defined and realistic
 - [ ] **Risk Management**: Technical risks identified with mitigation plans
 - [ ] **Performance Validation**: Architecture can meet performance requirements
-- [ ] **Evolution Strategy**: Design allows for future growth and changes
+- [ ] **Evolution Strategy**: Design allows for future growth and changes

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ui-designer.md

@@ -1,43 +1,59 @@
 ---
 name: ui-designer
-description: Generate or update ui-designer/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer [topic]
+description: Generate or update ui-designer/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for UI design perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ui-designer "mobile app navigation improvement"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🎨 **UI Designer Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating ui-designer/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from UI/UX design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating ui-designer/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from UI/UX design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **UI/UX Focus**: User experience, interface design, and accessibility perspective
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
 ### Analysis Scope
-- **User Experience Design**: Intuitive and efficient user experiences
-- **Interface Design**: Beautiful and functional user interfaces
-- **Interaction Design**: Smooth user interaction flows and micro-interactions
-- **Accessibility Design**: Inclusive design meeting WCAG compliance
+- **Visual Design**: Color palettes, typography, spacing, and visual hierarchy implementation
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished, pixel-perfect interface designs
+- **Design System Implementation**: Component libraries, design tokens, and style guides
+- **Micro-Interactions & Animations**: Transition effects, loading states, and interactive feedback
+- **Responsive Design**: Layout adaptations for different screen sizes and devices
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Concrete Visual Interface Implementation)**
+- **Visual Design Language**: Colors, typography, iconography, spacing, and overall aesthetic
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished designs showing exactly how the interface will look
+- **Design System Components**: Building and documenting reusable UI components (buttons, inputs, cards, etc.)
+- **Design Tokens**: Defining variables for colors, spacing, typography that can be used in code
+- **Micro-Interactions**: Hover states, transitions, animations, and interactive feedback details
+- **Responsive Layouts**: Adapting designs for mobile, tablet, and desktop breakpoints
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **User Research & Personas**: User behavior analysis and needs assessment → Defers to **UX Expert**
+- **Information Architecture**: Content structure and navigation strategy → Defers to **UX Expert**
+- **Low-Fidelity Wireframes**: Structural layouts without visual design → Defers to **UX Expert**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **FROM UX Expert**: Receives wireframes, user flows, and information architecture as the foundation for visual design
+- **TO Frontend Developers**: Provides design specifications, component libraries, and design tokens for implementation
+- **WITH API Designer**: Coordinates on data presentation and form validation feedback (visual aspects only)
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +88,13 @@ Execute ui-designer analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: ui-designer
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +104,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from UI/UX perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from UI/UX perspective
 **Role Focus**: User experience design, interface optimization, accessibility compliance
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive UI/UX analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with UI/UX design expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with UI/UX design expertise
 - Provide actionable design recommendations and interface solutions
 - Include accessibility considerations and WCAG compliance planning
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +137,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +164,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +173,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # UI Designer Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: UI/UX Design perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with UI/UX expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with UI/UX expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [UI/UX perspective on requirements]
@@ -193,13 +209,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "ui_designer": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UI/UX insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
-- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance
+- **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/ux-expert.md

@@ -1,43 +1,59 @@
 ---
 name: ux-expert
-description: Generate or update ux-expert/analysis.md addressing topic-framework discussion points
-usage: /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert [topic]
+description: Generate or update ux-expert/analysis.md addressing guidance-specification discussion points for UX perspective
 argument-hint: "optional topic - uses existing framework if available"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert "user authentication redesign"
-  - /workflow:brainstorm:ux-expert "mobile app performance optimization"
 allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*)
 ---
 
 ## 🎯 **UX Expert Analysis Generator**
 
 ### Purpose
-**Specialized command for generating ux-expert/analysis.md** that addresses topic-framework.md discussion points from user experience and interface design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
+**Specialized command for generating ux-expert/analysis.md** that addresses guidance-specification.md discussion points from user experience and interface design perspective. Creates or updates role-specific analysis with framework references.
 
 ### Core Function
-- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in topic-framework.md
+- **Framework-based Analysis**: Address each discussion point in guidance-specification.md
 - **UX Design Focus**: User interface, interaction patterns, and usability optimization
 - **Update Mechanism**: Create new or update existing analysis.md
 - **Agent Delegation**: Use conceptual-planning-agent for analysis generation
 
 ### Analysis Scope
-- **User Interface Design**: Visual hierarchy, layout patterns, and component design
-- **Interaction Patterns**: User flows, navigation, and microinteractions
-- **Usability Optimization**: Accessibility, cognitive load, and user testing strategies
-- **Design Systems**: Component libraries, design tokens, and consistency frameworks
+- **User Research**: User personas, behavioral analysis, and needs assessment
+- **Information Architecture**: Content structure, navigation hierarchy, and mental models
+- **User Journey Mapping**: User flows, task analysis, and interaction models
+- **Usability Strategy**: Accessibility planning, cognitive load reduction, and user testing frameworks
+- **Wireframing**: Low-fidelity layouts and structural prototypes (not visual design)
+
+### Role Boundaries & Responsibilities
+
+#### **What This Role OWNS (Abstract User Experience & Research)**
+- **User Research & Personas**: Understanding target users, their goals, pain points, and behaviors
+- **Information Architecture**: Organizing content and defining navigation structures at a conceptual level
+- **User Journey Mapping**: Defining user flows, task sequences, and interaction models
+- **Wireframes & Low-Fidelity Prototypes**: Structural layouts showing information hierarchy (boxes and arrows, not colors/fonts)
+- **Usability Testing Strategy**: Planning user testing, A/B tests, and validation methods
+- **Accessibility Planning**: WCAG compliance strategy and inclusive design principles
+
+#### **What This Role DOES NOT Own (Defers to Other Roles)**
+- **Visual Design**: Colors, typography, spacing, visual style → Defers to **UI Designer**
+- **High-Fidelity Mockups**: Polished, pixel-perfect designs → Defers to **UI Designer**
+- **Component Implementation**: Design system components, CSS, animations → Defers to **UI Designer**
+
+#### **Handoff Points**
+- **TO UI Designer**: Provides wireframes, user flows, and information architecture that UI Designer will transform into high-fidelity visual designs
+- **FROM User Research**: May receive external research data to inform UX decisions
+- **TO Product Owner**: Provides user insights and validation results to inform feature prioritization
 
 ## ⚙️ **Execution Protocol**
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Framework Detection
 ```bash
 # Check active session and framework
-CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
+CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
 IF active_session EXISTS:
     session_id = get_active_session()
-    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
+    brainstorm_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
 
-    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
+    CHECK: brainstorm_dir/guidance-specification.md
     IF EXISTS:
         framework_mode = true
         load_framework = true
@@ -72,13 +88,13 @@ Execute ux-expert analysis for existing topic framework
 
 ## Context Loading
 ASSIGNED_ROLE: ux-expert
-OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
+OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
 ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
 1. **load_topic_framework**
    - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
    - Output: topic_framework_content
 
 2. **load_role_template**
@@ -88,21 +104,21 @@ ANALYSIS_MODE: {framework_mode ? "framework_based" : "standalone"}
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata and existing context
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_context
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
-**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in topic-framework.md from user experience and interface design perspective
+**Framework Reference**: Address all discussion points in guidance-specification.md from user experience and interface design perspective
 **Role Focus**: UI design, interaction patterns, usability optimization, design systems
 **Structured Approach**: Create analysis.md addressing framework discussion points
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
 1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive UX design analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../topic-framework.md reference in analysis
+2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
 
 ## Completion Criteria
-- Address each discussion point from topic-framework.md with UX design expertise
+- Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with UX design expertise
 - Provide actionable interface design and usability optimization strategies
 - Include accessibility considerations and interaction pattern recommendations
 - Reference framework document using @ notation for integration
@@ -121,7 +137,7 @@ TodoWrite({
       activeForm: "Detecting session and framework"
     },
     {
-      content: "Load topic-framework.md and session metadata for context",
+      content: "Load guidance-specification.md and session metadata for context",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Loading framework and session context"
     },
@@ -148,8 +164,8 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Framework-Based Analysis
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
-└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing topic-framework.md discussion points
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/
+└── analysis.md    # Structured analysis addressing guidance-specification.md discussion points
 ```
 
 ### Analysis Document Structure
@@ -157,11 +173,11 @@ TodoWrite({
 # UX Expert Analysis: [Topic from Framework]
 
 ## Framework Reference
-**Topic Framework**: @../topic-framework.md
+**Topic Framework**: @../guidance-specification.md
 **Role Focus**: User Experience & Interface Design perspective
 
 ## Discussion Points Analysis
-[Address each point from topic-framework.md with UX design expertise]
+[Address each point from guidance-specification.md with UX design expertise]
 
 ### Core Requirements (from framework)
 [User interface and interaction design requirements perspective]
@@ -193,13 +209,13 @@ TodoWrite({
   "ux_expert": {
     "status": "completed",
     "framework_addressed": true,
-    "output_location": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/analysis.md",
-    "framework_reference": "@../topic-framework.md"
+    "output_location": ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/ux-expert/analysis.md",
+    "framework_reference": "@../guidance-specification.md"
   }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Integration Points
-- **Framework Reference**: @../topic-framework.md for structured discussion points
+- **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md for structured discussion points
 - **Cross-Role Synthesis**: UX design insights available for synthesis-report.md integration
 - **Agent Autonomy**: Independent execution with framework guidance

.claude/commands/workflow/clean.md

@@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
+---
+name: clean
+description: Intelligent code cleanup with mainline detection, stale artifact discovery, and safe execution
+argument-hint: "[--dry-run] [\"focus area\"]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Clean Command (/workflow:clean)
+
+## Overview
+
+Intelligent cleanup command that explores the codebase to identify the development mainline, discovers artifacts that have drifted from it, and safely removes stale sessions, abandoned documents, and dead code.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Mainline detection: Identify active development branches and core modules
+- Drift analysis: Find sessions, documents, and code that deviate from mainline
+- Intelligent discovery: cli-explore-agent based artifact scanning
+- Safe execution: Confirmation-based cleanup with dry-run preview
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:clean                          # Full intelligent cleanup (explore → analyze → confirm → execute)
+/workflow:clean --dry-run                # Explore and analyze only, no execution
+/workflow:clean "auth module"            # Focus cleanup on specific area
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Mainline Detection
+   ├─ Analyze git history for development trends
+   ├─ Identify core modules (high commit frequency)
+   ├─ Map active vs stale branches
+   └─ Build mainline profile
+
+Phase 2: Drift Discovery (cli-explore-agent)
+   ├─ Scan workflow sessions for orphaned artifacts
+   ├─ Identify documents drifted from mainline
+   ├─ Detect dead code and unused exports
+   └─ Generate cleanup manifest
+
+Phase 3: Confirmation
+   ├─ Display cleanup summary by category
+   ├─ Show impact analysis (files, size, risk)
+   └─ AskUserQuestion: Select categories to clean
+
+Phase 4: Execution (unless --dry-run)
+   ├─ Execute cleanup by category
+   ├─ Update manifests and indexes
+   └─ Report results
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Mainline Detection
+
+**Session Setup**:
+```javascript
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
+const sessionId = `clean-${dateStr}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.clean/${sessionId}`
+
+Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}`)
+```
+
+**Step 1.1: Git History Analysis**
+```bash
+# Get commit frequency by directory (last 30 days)
+bash(git log --since="30 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | grep -v "^$" | cut -d/ -f1-2 | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20)
+
+# Get recent active branches
+bash(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:relative)' | head -10)
+
+# Get files with most recent changes
+bash(git log --since="7 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | grep -v "^$" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -30)
+```
+
+**Step 1.2: Build Mainline Profile**
+```javascript
+const mainlineProfile = {
+  coreModules: [],        // High-frequency directories
+  activeFiles: [],        // Recently modified files
+  activeBranches: [],     // Branches with recent commits
+  staleThreshold: {
+    sessions: 7,          // Days
+    branches: 30,
+    documents: 14
+  },
+  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString()
+}
+
+// Parse git log output to identify core modules
+// Modules with >5 commits in last 30 days = core
+// Modules with 0 commits in last 30 days = potentially stale
+
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/mainline-profile.json`, JSON.stringify(mainlineProfile, null, 2))
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Drift Discovery
+
+**Launch cli-explore-agent for intelligent artifact scanning**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Discover stale artifacts",
+  prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Discover artifacts that have drifted from the development mainline. Identify stale sessions, abandoned documents, and dead code for cleanup.
+
+## Context
+- **Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
+- **Mainline Profile**: ${sessionFolder}/mainline-profile.json
+- **Focus Area**: ${focusArea || "全项目"}
+
+## Discovery Categories
+
+### Category 1: Stale Workflow Sessions
+Scan and analyze workflow session directories:
+
+**Locations to scan**:
+- .workflow/active/WFS-* (active sessions)
+- .workflow/archives/WFS-* (archived sessions)
+- .workflow/.lite-plan/* (lite-plan sessions)
+- .workflow/.debug/DBG-* (debug sessions)
+
+**Staleness criteria**:
+- Active sessions: No modification >7 days + no related git commits
+- Archives: >30 days old + no feature references in project.json
+- Lite-plan: >7 days old + plan.json not executed
+- Debug: >3 days old + issue not in recent commits
+
+**Analysis steps**:
+1. List all session directories with modification times
+2. Cross-reference with git log (are session topics in recent commits?)
+3. Check manifest.json for orphan entries
+4. Identify sessions with .archiving marker (interrupted)
+
+### Category 2: Drifted Documents
+Scan documentation that no longer aligns with code:
+
+**Locations to scan**:
+- .claude/rules/tech/* (generated tech rules)
+- .workflow/.scratchpad/* (temporary notes)
+- **/CLAUDE.md (module documentation)
+- **/README.md (outdated descriptions)
+
+**Drift criteria**:
+- Tech rules: Referenced files no longer exist
+- Scratchpad: Any file (always temporary)
+- Module docs: Describe functions/classes that were removed
+- READMEs: Reference deleted directories
+
+**Analysis steps**:
+1. Parse document content for file/function references
+2. Verify referenced entities still exist in codebase
+3. Flag documents with >30% broken references
+
+### Category 3: Dead Code
+Identify code that is no longer used:
+
+**Scan patterns**:
+- Unused exports (exported but never imported)
+- Orphan files (not imported anywhere)
+- Commented-out code blocks (>10 lines)
+- TODO/FIXME comments >90 days old
+
+**Analysis steps**:
+1. Build import graph using rg/grep
+2. Identify exports with no importers
+3. Find files not in import graph
+4. Scan for large comment blocks
+
+## Output Format
+
+Write to: ${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json
+
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "generated_at": "ISO timestamp",
+  "mainline_summary": {
+    "core_modules": ["src/core", "src/api"],
+    "active_branches": ["main", "feature/auth"],
+    "health_score": 0.85
+  },
+  "discoveries": {
+    "stale_sessions": [
+      {
+        "path": ".workflow/active/WFS-old-feature",
+        "type": "active",
+        "age_days": 15,
+        "reason": "No related commits in 15 days",
+        "size_kb": 1024,
+        "risk": "low"
+      }
+    ],
+    "drifted_documents": [
+      {
+        "path": ".claude/rules/tech/deprecated-lib",
+        "type": "tech_rules",
+        "broken_references": 5,
+        "total_references": 6,
+        "drift_percentage": 83,
+        "reason": "Referenced library removed",
+        "risk": "low"
+      }
+    ],
+    "dead_code": [
+      {
+        "path": "src/utils/legacy.ts",
+        "type": "orphan_file",
+        "reason": "Not imported by any file",
+        "last_modified": "2025-10-01",
+        "risk": "medium"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "summary": {
+    "total_items": 12,
+    "total_size_mb": 45.2,
+    "by_category": {
+      "stale_sessions": 5,
+      "drifted_documents": 4,
+      "dead_code": 3
+    },
+    "by_risk": {
+      "low": 8,
+      "medium": 3,
+      "high": 1
+    }
+  }
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Execution Commands
+
+\`\`\`bash
+# Session directories
+find .workflow -type d -name "WFS-*" -o -name "DBG-*" 2>/dev/null
+
+# Check modification times (Linux/Mac)
+stat -c "%Y %n" .workflow/active/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
+
+# Check modification times (Windows PowerShell via bash)
+powershell -Command "Get-ChildItem '.workflow/active/WFS-*' | ForEach-Object { Write-Output \"$($_.LastWriteTime) $($_.FullName)\" }"
+
+# Find orphan exports (TypeScript)
+rg "export (const|function|class|interface|type)" --type ts -l
+
+# Find imports
+rg "import.*from" --type ts
+
+# Find large comment blocks
+rg "^\\s*/\\*" -A 10 --type ts
+
+# Find old TODOs
+rg "TODO|FIXME" --type ts -n
+\`\`\`
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] All session directories scanned with age calculation
+- [ ] Documents cross-referenced with existing code
+- [ ] Dead code detection via import graph analysis
+- [ ] cleanup-manifest.json written with complete data
+- [ ] Each item has risk level and cleanup reason
+`
+)
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Confirmation
+
+**Step 3.1: Display Summary**
+```javascript
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json`))
+
+console.log(`
+## Cleanup Discovery Report
+
+**Mainline Health**: ${Math.round(manifest.mainline_summary.health_score * 100)}%
+**Core Modules**: ${manifest.mainline_summary.core_modules.join(', ')}
+
+### Summary
+| Category | Count | Size | Risk |
+|----------|-------|------|------|
+| Stale Sessions | ${manifest.summary.by_category.stale_sessions} | - | ${getRiskSummary('sessions')} |
+| Drifted Documents | ${manifest.summary.by_category.drifted_documents} | - | ${getRiskSummary('documents')} |
+| Dead Code | ${manifest.summary.by_category.dead_code} | - | ${getRiskSummary('code')} |
+
+**Total**: ${manifest.summary.total_items} items, ~${manifest.summary.total_size_mb} MB
+
+### Stale Sessions
+${manifest.discoveries.stale_sessions.map(s =>
+  `- ${s.path} (${s.age_days}d, ${s.risk}): ${s.reason}`
+).join('\n')}
+
+### Drifted Documents
+${manifest.discoveries.drifted_documents.map(d =>
+  `- ${d.path} (${d.drift_percentage}% broken, ${d.risk}): ${d.reason}`
+).join('\n')}
+
+### Dead Code
+${manifest.discoveries.dead_code.map(c =>
+  `- ${c.path} (${c.type}, ${c.risk}): ${c.reason}`
+).join('\n')}
+`)
+```
+
+**Step 3.2: Dry-Run Exit**
+```javascript
+if (flags.includes('--dry-run')) {
+  console.log(`
+---
+**Dry-run mode**: No changes made.
+Manifest saved to: ${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json
+
+To execute cleanup: /workflow:clean
+`)
+  return
+}
+```
+
+**Step 3.3: User Confirmation**
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "Which categories to clean?",
+      header: "Categories",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: [
+        {
+          label: "Sessions",
+          description: `${manifest.summary.by_category.stale_sessions} stale workflow sessions`
+        },
+        {
+          label: "Documents",
+          description: `${manifest.summary.by_category.drifted_documents} drifted documents`
+        },
+        {
+          label: "Dead Code",
+          description: `${manifest.summary.by_category.dead_code} unused code files`
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Risk level to include?",
+      header: "Risk",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Low only", description: "Safest - only obviously stale items" },
+        { label: "Low + Medium", description: "Recommended - includes likely unused items" },
+        { label: "All", description: "Aggressive - includes high-risk items" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Execution
+
+**Step 4.1: Filter Items by Selection**
+```javascript
+const selectedCategories = userSelection.categories  // ['Sessions', 'Documents', ...]
+const riskLevel = userSelection.risk                 // 'Low only', 'Low + Medium', 'All'
+
+const riskFilter = {
+  'Low only': ['low'],
+  'Low + Medium': ['low', 'medium'],
+  'All': ['low', 'medium', 'high']
+}[riskLevel]
+
+const itemsToClean = []
+
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Sessions')) {
+  itemsToClean.push(...manifest.discoveries.stale_sessions.filter(s => riskFilter.includes(s.risk)))
+}
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Documents')) {
+  itemsToClean.push(...manifest.discoveries.drifted_documents.filter(d => riskFilter.includes(d.risk)))
+}
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Dead Code')) {
+  itemsToClean.push(...manifest.discoveries.dead_code.filter(c => riskFilter.includes(c.risk)))
+}
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: itemsToClean.map(item => ({
+    content: `Clean: ${item.path}`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Cleaning ${item.path}`
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+**Step 4.2: Execute Cleanup**
+```javascript
+const results = { deleted: [], failed: [], skipped: [] }
+
+for (const item of itemsToClean) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: [...] })  // Mark current as in_progress
+
+  try {
+    if (item.type === 'orphan_file' || item.type === 'dead_export') {
+      // Dead code: Delete file or remove export
+      Bash({ command: `rm -rf "${item.path}"` })
+    } else {
+      // Sessions and documents: Delete directory/file
+      Bash({ command: `rm -rf "${item.path}"` })
+    }
+
+    results.deleted.push(item.path)
+    TodoWrite({ todos: [...] })  // Mark as completed
+  } catch (error) {
+    results.failed.push({ path: item.path, error: error.message })
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Step 4.3: Update Manifests**
+```javascript
+// Update archives manifest if sessions were deleted
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Sessions')) {
+  const archiveManifestPath = '.workflow/archives/manifest.json'
+  if (fileExists(archiveManifestPath)) {
+    const archiveManifest = JSON.parse(Read(archiveManifestPath))
+    const deletedSessionIds = results.deleted
+      .filter(p => p.includes('WFS-'))
+      .map(p => p.split('/').pop())
+
+    const updatedManifest = archiveManifest.filter(entry =>
+      !deletedSessionIds.includes(entry.session_id)
+    )
+
+    Write(archiveManifestPath, JSON.stringify(updatedManifest, null, 2))
+  }
+}
+
+// Update project.json if features referenced deleted sessions
+const projectPath = '.workflow/project.json'
+if (fileExists(projectPath)) {
+  const project = JSON.parse(Read(projectPath))
+  const deletedPaths = new Set(results.deleted)
+
+  project.features = project.features.filter(f =>
+    !deletedPaths.has(f.traceability?.archive_path)
+  )
+
+  project.statistics.total_features = project.features.length
+  project.statistics.last_updated = getUtc8ISOString()
+
+  Write(projectPath, JSON.stringify(project, null, 2))
+}
+```
+
+**Step 4.4: Report Results**
+```javascript
+console.log(`
+## Cleanup Complete
+
+**Deleted**: ${results.deleted.length} items
+**Failed**: ${results.failed.length} items
+**Skipped**: ${results.skipped.length} items
+
+### Deleted Items
+${results.deleted.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n')}
+
+${results.failed.length > 0 ? `
+### Failed Items
+${results.failed.map(f => `- ${f.path}: ${f.error}`).join('\n')}
+` : ''}
+
+Cleanup manifest archived to: ${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json
+`)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Session Folder Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.clean/{YYYY-MM-DD}/
+├── mainline-profile.json     # Git history analysis
+└── cleanup-manifest.json     # Discovery results
+```
+
+## Risk Level Definitions
+
+| Risk | Description | Examples |
+|------|-------------|----------|
+| **Low** | Safe to delete, no dependencies | Empty sessions, scratchpad files, 100% broken docs |
+| **Medium** | Likely unused, verify before delete | Orphan files, old archives, partially broken docs |
+| **High** | May have hidden dependencies | Files with some imports, recent modifications |
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| No git repository | Skip mainline detection, use file timestamps only |
+| Session in use (.archiving) | Skip with warning |
+| Permission denied | Report error, continue with others |
+| Manifest parse error | Regenerate from filesystem scan |
+| Empty discovery | Report "codebase is clean" |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Properly archive active sessions
+- `/memory:compact` - Save session memory before cleanup
+- `/workflow:status` - View current workflow state

.claude/commands/workflow/concept-verify.md

@@ -1,311 +0,0 @@
----
-name: concept-verify
-description: Identify underspecified areas in brainstorming artifacts through targeted clarification questions before action planning
-usage: /workflow:concept-verify [--session <session-id>]
-argument-hint: "optional: --session <session-id>"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:concept-verify
-  - /workflow:concept-verify --session WFS-auth
-allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-## User Input
-
-```text
-$ARGUMENTS
-```
-
-You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
-
-## Outline
-
-**Goal**: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in brainstorming artifacts (synthesis-specification.md, topic-framework.md, role analyses) before moving to action planning phase.
-
-**Timing**: This command runs AFTER `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` and BEFORE `/workflow:plan`. It serves as a quality gate to ensure conceptual clarity before detailed task planning.
-
-**Execution steps**:
-
-1. **Session Detection & Validation**
-   ```bash
-   # Detect active workflow session
-   IF --session parameter provided:
-       session_id = provided session
-   ELSE:
-       CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
-       IF active_session EXISTS:
-           session_id = get_active_session()
-       ELSE:
-           ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id> or start a session."
-           EXIT
-
-   # Validate brainstorming completion
-   brainstorm_dir = .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-
-   CHECK: brainstorm_dir/synthesis-specification.md
-   IF NOT EXISTS:
-       ERROR: "synthesis-specification.md not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
-       EXIT
-
-   CHECK: brainstorm_dir/topic-framework.md
-   IF NOT EXISTS:
-       WARN: "topic-framework.md not found. Verification will be limited."
-   ```
-
-2. **Load Brainstorming Artifacts**
-   ```bash
-   # Load primary artifacts
-   synthesis_spec = Read(brainstorm_dir + "/synthesis-specification.md")
-   topic_framework = Read(brainstorm_dir + "/topic-framework.md") # if exists
-
-   # Discover role analyses
-   role_analyses = Glob(brainstorm_dir + "/*/analysis.md")
-   participating_roles = extract_role_names(role_analyses)
-   ```
-
-3. **Ambiguity & Coverage Scan**
-
-   Perform structured scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: **Clear** / **Partial** / **Missing**.
-
-   **Requirements Clarity**:
-   - Functional requirements specificity and measurability
-   - Non-functional requirements with quantified targets
-   - Business requirements with success metrics
-   - Acceptance criteria completeness
-
-   **Architecture & Design Clarity**:
-   - Architecture decisions with rationale
-   - Data model completeness (entities, relationships, constraints)
-   - Technology stack justification
-   - Integration points and API contracts
-
-   **User Experience & Interface**:
-   - User journey completeness
-   - Critical interaction flows
-   - Error/edge case handling
-   - Accessibility and localization considerations
-
-   **Implementation Feasibility**:
-   - Team capability vs. required skills
-   - External dependencies and failure modes
-   - Resource constraints (timeline, personnel)
-   - Technical constraints and tradeoffs
-
-   **Risk & Mitigation**:
-   - Critical risks identified
-   - Mitigation strategies defined
-   - Success factors clarity
-   - Monitoring and quality gates
-
-   **Process & Collaboration**:
-   - Role responsibilities and handoffs
-   - Collaboration patterns defined
-   - Timeline and milestone clarity
-   - Dependency management strategy
-
-   **Decision Traceability**:
-   - Controversial points documented
-   - Alternatives considered and rejected
-   - Decision rationale clarity
-   - Consensus vs. dissent tracking
-
-   **Terminology & Consistency**:
-   - Canonical terms defined
-   - Consistent naming across artifacts
-   - No unresolved placeholders (TODO, TBD, ???)
-
-   For each category with **Partial** or **Missing** status, add to candidate question queue unless:
-   - Clarification would not materially change implementation strategy
-   - Information is better deferred to planning phase
-
-4. **Generate Prioritized Question Queue**
-
-   Internally generate prioritized queue of candidate questions (maximum 5):
-
-   **Constraints**:
-   - Maximum 5 questions per session
-   - Each question must be answerable with:
-     * Multiple-choice (2-5 mutually exclusive options), OR
-     * Short answer (≤5 words)
-   - Only include questions whose answers materially impact:
-     * Architecture decisions
-     * Data modeling
-     * Task decomposition
-     * Risk mitigation
-     * Success criteria
-   - Ensure category coverage balance
-   - Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk
-
-   **Prioritization Heuristic**:
-   ```
-   priority_score = (impact_on_planning * 0.4) +
-                    (uncertainty_level * 0.3) +
-                    (risk_if_unresolved * 0.3)
-   ```
-
-   If zero high-impact ambiguities found, proceed to **Step 8** (report success).
-
-5. **Sequential Question Loop** (Interactive)
-
-   Present **EXACTLY ONE** question at a time:
-
-   **Multiple-choice format**:
-   ```markdown
-   **Question {N}/5**: {Question text}
-
-   | Option | Description |
-   |--------|-------------|
-   | A | {Option A description} |
-   | B | {Option B description} |
-   | C | {Option C description} |
-   | D | {Option D description} |
-   | Short | Provide different answer (≤5 words) |
-   ```
-
-   **Short-answer format**:
-   ```markdown
-   **Question {N}/5**: {Question text}
-
-   Format: Short answer (≤5 words)
-   ```
-
-   **Answer Validation**:
-   - Validate answer maps to option or fits ≤5 word constraint
-   - If ambiguous, ask quick disambiguation (doesn't count as new question)
-   - Once satisfactory, record in working memory and proceed to next question
-
-   **Stop Conditions**:
-   - All critical ambiguities resolved
-   - User signals completion ("done", "no more", "proceed")
-   - Reached 5 questions
-
-   **Never reveal future queued questions in advance**.
-
-6. **Integration After Each Answer** (Incremental Update)
-
-   After each accepted answer:
-
-   ```bash
-   # Ensure Clarifications section exists
-   IF synthesis_spec NOT contains "## Clarifications":
-       Insert "## Clarifications" section after "# [Topic]" heading
-
-   # Create session subsection
-   IF NOT contains "### Session YYYY-MM-DD":
-       Create "### Session {today's date}" under "## Clarifications"
-
-   # Append clarification entry
-   APPEND: "- Q: {question} → A: {answer}"
-
-   # Apply clarification to appropriate section
-   CASE category:
-       Functional Requirements → Update "## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria"
-       Architecture → Update "## Key Designs & Decisions" or "## Design Specifications"
-       User Experience → Update "## Design Specifications > UI/UX Guidelines"
-       Risk → Update "## Risk Assessment & Mitigation"
-       Process → Update "## Process & Collaboration Concerns"
-       Data Model → Update "## Key Designs & Decisions > Data Model Overview"
-       Non-Functional → Update "## Requirements & Acceptance Criteria > Non-Functional Requirements"
-
-   # Remove obsolete/contradictory statements
-   IF clarification invalidates existing statement:
-       Replace statement instead of duplicating
-
-   # Save immediately
-   Write(synthesis_specification.md)
-   ```
-
-7. **Validation After Each Write**
-
-   - [ ] Clarifications section contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer
-   - [ ] Total asked questions ≤ 5
-   - [ ] Updated sections contain no lingering placeholders
-   - [ ] No contradictory earlier statements remain
-   - [ ] Markdown structure valid
-   - [ ] Terminology consistent across all updated sections
-
-8. **Completion Report**
-
-   After questioning loop ends or early termination:
-
-   ```markdown
-   ## ✅ Concept Verification Complete
-
-   **Session**: WFS-{session-id}
-   **Questions Asked**: {count}/5
-   **Artifacts Updated**: synthesis-specification.md
-   **Sections Touched**: {list section names}
-
-   ### Coverage Summary
-
-   | Category | Status | Notes |
-   |----------|--------|-------|
-   | Requirements Clarity | ✅ Resolved | Acceptance criteria quantified |
-   | Architecture & Design | ✅ Clear | No ambiguities found |
-   | Implementation Feasibility | ⚠️ Deferred | Team training plan to be defined in IMPL_PLAN |
-   | Risk & Mitigation | ✅ Resolved | Critical risks now have mitigation strategies |
-   | ... | ... | ... |
-
-   **Legend**:
-   - ✅ Resolved: Was Partial/Missing, now addressed
-   - ✅ Clear: Already sufficient
-   - ⚠️ Deferred: Low impact, better suited for planning phase
-   - ❌ Outstanding: Still Partial/Missing but question quota reached
-
-   ### Recommendations
-
-   - ✅ **PROCEED to /workflow:plan**: Conceptual foundation is clear
-   - OR ⚠️ **Address Outstanding Items First**: {list critical outstanding items}
-   - OR 🔄 **Run /workflow:concept-verify Again**: If new information available
-
-   ### Next Steps
-   ```bash
-   /workflow:plan  # Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json
-   ```
-   ```
-
-9. **Update Session Metadata**
-
-   ```json
-   {
-     "phases": {
-       "BRAINSTORM": {
-         "status": "completed",
-         "concept_verification": {
-           "completed": true,
-           "completed_at": "timestamp",
-           "questions_asked": 3,
-           "categories_clarified": ["Requirements", "Risk", "Architecture"],
-           "outstanding_items": [],
-           "recommendation": "PROCEED_TO_PLANNING"
-         }
-       }
-     }
-   }
-   ```
-
-## Behavior Rules
-
-- **If no meaningful ambiguities found**: Report "No critical ambiguities detected. Conceptual foundation is clear." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:plan`.
-- **If synthesis-specification.md missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` first.
-- **Never exceed 5 questions** (disambiguation retries don't count as new questions).
-- **Respect user early termination**: Signals like "stop", "done", "proceed" should stop questioning.
-- **If quota reached with high-impact items unresolved**: Explicitly flag them under "Outstanding" with recommendation to address before planning.
-- **Avoid speculative tech stack questions** unless absence blocks conceptual clarity.
-
-## Operating Principles
-
-### Context Efficiency
-- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable clarifications
-- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
-- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent analysis
-
-### Verification Guidelines
-- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections**: Report them accurately
-- **Prioritize high-impact ambiguities**: Focus on what affects planning
-- **Use examples over exhaustive rules**: Cite specific instances
-- **Report zero issues gracefully**: Emit success report with coverage statistics
-- **Update incrementally**: Save after each answer to minimize context loss
-
-## Context
-
-{ARGS}

.claude/commands/workflow/debug.md

@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
+---
+name: debug
+description: Interactive hypothesis-driven debugging with NDJSON logging, iterative until resolved
+argument-hint: "\"bug description or error message\""
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), Edit(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Debug Command (/workflow:debug)
+
+## Overview
+
+Evidence-based interactive debugging command. Systematically identifies root causes through hypothesis-driven logging and iterative verification.
+
+**Core workflow**: Explore → Add Logging → Reproduce → Analyze Log → Fix → Verify
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:debug <BUG_DESCRIPTION>
+
+# Arguments
+<bug-description>          Bug description, error message, or stack trace (required)
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Session Detection:
+   ├─ Check if debug session exists for this bug
+   ├─ EXISTS + debug.log has content → Analyze mode
+   └─ NOT_FOUND or empty log → Explore mode
+
+Explore Mode:
+   ├─ Locate error source in codebase
+   ├─ Generate testable hypotheses (dynamic count)
+   ├─ Add NDJSON logging instrumentation
+   └─ Output: Hypothesis list + await user reproduction
+
+Analyze Mode:
+   ├─ Parse debug.log, validate each hypothesis
+   └─ Decision:
+       ├─ Confirmed → Fix root cause
+       ├─ Inconclusive → Add more logging, iterate
+       └─ All rejected → Generate new hypotheses
+
+Fix & Cleanup:
+   ├─ Apply fix based on confirmed hypothesis
+   ├─ User verifies
+   ├─ Remove debug instrumentation
+   └─ If not fixed → Return to Analyze mode
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Session Setup & Mode Detection
+
+```javascript
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const bugSlug = bug_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 30)
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
+
+const sessionId = `DBG-${bugSlug}-${dateStr}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.debug/${sessionId}`
+const debugLogPath = `${sessionFolder}/debug.log`
+
+// Auto-detect mode
+const sessionExists = fs.existsSync(sessionFolder)
+const logHasContent = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(debugLogPath) && fs.statSync(debugLogPath).size > 0
+
+const mode = logHasContent ? 'analyze' : 'explore'
+
+if (!sessionExists) {
+  bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}`)
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Explore Mode
+
+**Step 1.1: Locate Error Source**
+
+```javascript
+// Extract keywords from bug description
+const keywords = extractErrorKeywords(bug_description)
+// e.g., ['Stack Length', '未找到', 'registered 0']
+
+// Search codebase for error locations
+for (const keyword of keywords) {
+  Grep({ pattern: keyword, path: ".", output_mode: "content", "-C": 3 })
+}
+
+// Identify affected files and functions
+const affectedLocations = [...]  // from search results
+```
+
+**Step 1.2: Generate Hypotheses (Dynamic)**
+
+```javascript
+// Hypothesis categories based on error pattern
+const HYPOTHESIS_PATTERNS = {
+  "not found|missing|undefined|未找到": "data_mismatch",
+  "0|empty|zero|registered 0": "logic_error",
+  "timeout|connection|sync": "integration_issue",
+  "type|format|parse": "type_mismatch"
+}
+
+// Generate hypotheses based on actual issue (NOT fixed count)
+function generateHypotheses(bugDescription, affectedLocations) {
+  const hypotheses = []
+
+  // Analyze bug and create targeted hypotheses
+  // Each hypothesis has:
+  // - id: H1, H2, ... (dynamic count)
+  // - description: What might be wrong
+  // - testable_condition: What to log
+  // - logging_point: Where to add instrumentation
+
+  return hypotheses  // Could be 1, 3, 5, or more
+}
+
+const hypotheses = generateHypotheses(bug_description, affectedLocations)
+```
+
+**Step 1.3: Add NDJSON Instrumentation**
+
+For each hypothesis, add logging at the relevant location:
+
+**Python template**:
+```python
+# region debug [H{n}]
+try:
+    import json, time
+    _dbg = {
+        "sid": "{sessionId}",
+        "hid": "H{n}",
+        "loc": "{file}:{line}",
+        "msg": "{testable_condition}",
+        "data": {
+            # Capture relevant values here
+        },
+        "ts": int(time.time() * 1000)
+    }
+    with open(r"{debugLogPath}", "a", encoding="utf-8") as _f:
+        _f.write(json.dumps(_dbg, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
+except: pass
+# endregion
+```
+
+**JavaScript/TypeScript template**:
+```javascript
+// region debug [H{n}]
+try {
+  require('fs').appendFileSync("{debugLogPath}", JSON.stringify({
+    sid: "{sessionId}",
+    hid: "H{n}",
+    loc: "{file}:{line}",
+    msg: "{testable_condition}",
+    data: { /* Capture relevant values */ },
+    ts: Date.now()
+  }) + "\n");
+} catch(_) {}
+// endregion
+```
+
+**Output to user**:
+```
+## Hypotheses Generated
+
+Based on error "{bug_description}", generated {n} hypotheses:
+
+{hypotheses.map(h => `
+### ${h.id}: ${h.description}
+- Logging at: ${h.logging_point}
+- Testing: ${h.testable_condition}
+`).join('')}
+
+**Debug log**: ${debugLogPath}
+
+**Next**: Run reproduction steps, then come back for analysis.
+```
+
+---
+
+### Analyze Mode
+
+```javascript
+// Parse NDJSON log
+const entries = Read(debugLogPath).split('\n')
+  .filter(l => l.trim())
+  .map(l => JSON.parse(l))
+
+// Group by hypothesis
+const byHypothesis = groupBy(entries, 'hid')
+
+// Validate each hypothesis
+for (const [hid, logs] of Object.entries(byHypothesis)) {
+  const hypothesis = hypotheses.find(h => h.id === hid)
+  const latestLog = logs[logs.length - 1]
+
+  // Check if evidence confirms or rejects hypothesis
+  const verdict = evaluateEvidence(hypothesis, latestLog.data)
+  // Returns: 'confirmed' | 'rejected' | 'inconclusive'
+}
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```
+## Evidence Analysis
+
+Analyzed ${entries.length} log entries.
+
+${results.map(r => `
+### ${r.id}: ${r.description}
+- **Status**: ${r.verdict}
+- **Evidence**: ${JSON.stringify(r.evidence)}
+- **Reason**: ${r.reason}
+`).join('')}
+
+${confirmedHypothesis ? `
+## Root Cause Identified
+
+**${confirmedHypothesis.id}**: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}
+
+Ready to fix.
+` : `
+## Need More Evidence
+
+Add more logging or refine hypotheses.
+`}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Fix & Cleanup
+
+```javascript
+// Apply fix based on confirmed hypothesis
+// ... Edit affected files
+
+// After user verifies fix works:
+
+// Remove debug instrumentation (search for region markers)
+const instrumentedFiles = Grep({
+  pattern: "# region debug|// region debug",
+  output_mode: "files_with_matches"
+})
+
+for (const file of instrumentedFiles) {
+  // Remove content between region markers
+  removeDebugRegions(file)
+}
+
+console.log(`
+## Debug Complete
+
+- Root cause: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}
+- Fix applied to: ${modifiedFiles.join(', ')}
+- Debug instrumentation removed
+`)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Debug Log Format (NDJSON)
+
+Each line is a JSON object:
+
+```json
+{"sid":"DBG-xxx-2025-12-18","hid":"H1","loc":"file.py:func:42","msg":"Check dict keys","data":{"keys":["a","b"],"target":"c","found":false},"ts":1734567890123}
+```
+
+| Field | Description |
+|-------|-------------|
+| `sid` | Session ID |
+| `hid` | Hypothesis ID (H1, H2, ...) |
+| `loc` | Code location |
+| `msg` | What's being tested |
+| `data` | Captured values |
+| `ts` | Timestamp (ms) |
+
+## Session Folder
+
+```
+.workflow/.debug/DBG-{slug}-{date}/
+├── debug.log          # NDJSON log (main artifact)
+└── resolution.md      # Summary after fix (optional)
+```
+
+## Iteration Flow
+
+```
+First Call (/workflow:debug "error"):
+   ├─ No session exists → Explore mode
+   ├─ Extract error keywords, search codebase
+   ├─ Generate hypotheses, add logging
+   └─ Await user reproduction
+
+After Reproduction (/workflow:debug "error"):
+   ├─ Session exists + debug.log has content → Analyze mode
+   ├─ Parse log, evaluate hypotheses
+   └─ Decision:
+       ├─ Confirmed → Fix → User verify
+       │   ├─ Fixed → Cleanup → Done
+       │   └─ Not fixed → Add logging → Iterate
+       ├─ Inconclusive → Add logging → Iterate
+       └─ All rejected → New hypotheses → Iterate
+
+Output:
+   └─ .workflow/.debug/DBG-{slug}-{date}/debug.log
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Empty debug.log | Verify reproduction triggered the code path |
+| All hypotheses rejected | Generate new hypotheses with broader scope |
+| Fix doesn't work | Iterate with more granular logging |
+| >5 iterations | Escalate to `/workflow:lite-fix` with evidence |

.claude/commands/workflow/execute.md

@@ -1,115 +1,254 @@
 ---
 name: execute
-description: Coordinate agents for existing workflow tasks with automatic discovery
-usage: /workflow:execute [--resume-session="session-id"]
-argument-hint: [--resume-session="session-id"]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:execute
-  - /workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-user-auth"
+description: Coordinate agent execution for workflow tasks with automatic session discovery, parallel task processing, and status tracking
+argument-hint: "[--resume-session=\"session-id\"]"
 ---
 
 # Workflow Execute Command
 
 ## Overview
-Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption**, providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
+Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption** (except initial session selection if multiple active sessions exist), providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
 
 **Resume Mode**: When called with `--resume-session` flag, skips discovery phase and directly enters TodoWrite generation and agent execution for the specified session.
 
+## Performance Optimization Strategy
+
+**Lazy Loading**: Task JSONs read **on-demand** during execution, not upfront. TODO_LIST.md + IMPL_PLAN.md provide metadata for planning.
+
+**Loading Strategy**:
+- **TODO_LIST.md**: Read in Phase 3 (task metadata, status, dependencies for TodoWrite generation)
+- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Check existence in Phase 2 (normal mode), parse execution strategy in Phase 4A
+- **Task JSONs**: Lazy loading - read only when task is about to execute (Phase 4B)
+
 ## Core Rules
 **Complete entire workflow autonomously without user interruption, using TodoWrite for comprehensive progress tracking.**
-**Execute all discovered pending tasks sequentially until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
+**Execute all discovered pending tasks until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
 **Auto-complete session when all tasks finished: Call `/workflow:session:complete` upon workflow completion.**
+**ONE AGENT = ONE TASK JSON: Each agent instance executes exactly one task JSON file - never batch multiple tasks into single agent execution.**
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 - **Session Discovery**: Identify and select active workflow sessions
-- **Task Dependency Resolution**: Analyze task relationships and execution order
+- **Execution Strategy Parsing**: Extract execution model from IMPL_PLAN.md
 - **TodoWrite Progress Tracking**: Maintain real-time execution status throughout entire workflow
 - **Agent Orchestration**: Coordinate specialized agents with complete context
-- **Flow Control Execution**: Execute pre-analysis steps and context accumulation
 - **Status Synchronization**: Update task JSON files and workflow state
 - **Autonomous Completion**: Continue execution until all tasks complete or reach blocking state
 - **Session Auto-Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all workflow tasks finished
 
 ## Execution Philosophy
-- **Discovery-first**: Auto-discover existing plans and tasks
-- **Status-aware**: Execute only ready tasks with resolved dependencies
-- **Context-rich**: Provide complete task JSON and accumulated context to agents
-- **Progress tracking**: **Continuous TodoWrite updates throughout entire workflow execution**
-- **Flow control**: Sequential step execution with variable passing
-- **Autonomous completion**: **Execute all tasks without user interruption until workflow complete**
+- **Progress tracking**: Continuous TodoWrite updates throughout entire workflow execution
+- **Autonomous completion**: Execute all tasks without user interruption until workflow complete
 
-## Flow Control Execution
-**[FLOW_CONTROL]** marker indicates sequential step execution required for context gathering and preparation. **These steps are executed BY THE AGENT, not by the workflow:execute command.**
+## Execution Process
 
-### Flow Control Rules
-1. **Auto-trigger**: When `task.flow_control.pre_analysis` array exists in task JSON, agents execute these steps
-2. **Sequential Processing**: Agents execute steps in order, accumulating context including artifacts
-3. **Variable Passing**: Agents use `[variable_name]` syntax to reference step outputs including artifact content
-4. **Error Handling**: Agents follow step-specific error strategies (`fail`, `skip_optional`, `retry_once`)
-5. **Artifacts Priority**: When artifacts exist in task.context.artifacts, load synthesis specifications first
-
-### Execution Pattern
-```
-Step 1: load_dependencies → dependency_context
-Step 2: analyze_patterns [dependency_context] → pattern_analysis
-Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implementation
 ```
+Normal Mode:
+Phase 1: Discovery
+   ├─ Count active sessions
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ count=0 → ERROR: No active sessions
+      ├─ count=1 → Auto-select session → Phase 2
+      └─ count>1 → AskUserQuestion (max 4 options) → Phase 2
 
-### Context Accumulation Process (Executed by Agents)
-- **Load Artifacts**: Agents retrieve synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs from `context.artifacts`
-- **Load Dependencies**: Agents retrieve summaries from `context.depends_on` tasks
-- **Execute Analysis**: Agents run CLI tools with accumulated context including artifacts
-- **Prepare Implementation**: Agents build comprehensive context for implementation
-- **Continue Implementation**: Agents use all accumulated context including artifacts for task execution
+Phase 2: Planning Document Validation
+   ├─ Check IMPL_PLAN.md exists
+   ├─ Check TODO_LIST.md exists
+   └─ Validate .task/ contains IMPL-*.json files
+
+Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
+   ├─ Update session status to "active" (Step 0)
+   ├─ Parse TODO_LIST.md for task statuses
+   ├─ Generate TodoWrite for entire workflow
+   └─ Prepare session context paths
+
+Phase 4: Execution Strategy & Task Execution
+   ├─ Step 4A: Parse execution strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md
+   └─ Step 4B: Execute tasks with lazy loading
+      └─ Loop:
+         ├─ Get next in_progress task from TodoWrite
+         ├─ Lazy load task JSON
+         ├─ Launch agent with task context
+         ├─ Mark task completed (update IMPL-*.json status)
+         │  # Quick fix: Update task status for ccw dashboard
+         │  # TS=$(date -Iseconds) && jq --arg ts "$TS" '.status="completed" | .status_history=(.status_history // [])+[{"from":"in_progress","to":"completed","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
+         └─ Advance to next task
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   ├─ Update task statuses in JSON files
+   ├─ Generate summaries
+   └─ Auto-call /workflow:session:complete
+
+Resume Mode (--resume-session):
+   ├─ Skip Phase 1 & Phase 2
+   └─ Entry Point: Phase 3 (TodoWrite Generation)
+      ├─ Update session status to "active" (if not already)
+      └─ Continue: Phase 4 → Phase 5
+```
 
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
-### Resume Mode Detection
-**Special Flag Processing**: When `--resume-session="session-id"` is provided:
-1. **Skip Discovery Phase**: Use provided session ID directly
-2. **Load Specified Session**: Read session state from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
-3. **Direct TodoWrite Generation**: Skip to Phase 3 (Planning) immediately
-4. **Accelerated Execution**: Enter agent coordination without validation delays
+### Phase 1: Discovery
+**Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
 
-### Phase 1: Discovery (Normal Mode Only)
-1. **Check Active Sessions**: Find `.workflow/.active-*` markers
-2. **Select Session**: If multiple found, prompt user selection
-3. **Load Session State**: Read `workflow-session.json` and `IMPL_PLAN.md`
-4. **Scan Tasks**: Analyze `.task/*.json` files for ready tasks
+**Purpose**: Find and select active workflow session with user confirmation when multiple sessions exist
 
-**Note**: In resume mode, this phase is completely skipped.
+**Process**:
 
-### Phase 2: Analysis (Normal Mode Only)
-1. **Dependency Resolution**: Build execution order based on `depends_on`
-2. **Status Validation**: Filter tasks with `status: "pending"` and met dependencies
-3. **Agent Assignment**: Determine agent type from `meta.agent` or `meta.type`
-4. **Context Preparation**: Load dependency summaries and inherited context
+#### Step 1.1: Count Active Sessions
+```bash
+bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+```
 
-**Note**: In resume mode, this phase is also skipped as session analysis was already completed by `/workflow:status`.
+#### Step 1.2: Handle Session Selection
 
-### Phase 3: Planning (Resume Mode Entry Point)
-**This is where resume mode directly enters after skipping Phases 1 & 2**
+**Case A: No Sessions** (count = 0)
+```
+ERROR: No active workflow sessions found
+Run /workflow:plan "task description" to create a session
+```
 
-1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list with status markers from session state
-2. **Mark Initial Status**: Set first pending task as `in_progress`
-3. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
-4. **Prepare Complete Task JSON**: Include pre_analysis and flow control steps for agent consumption
-5. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure all required context is available from existing session
+**Case B: Single Session** (count = 1)
+```bash
+bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
+```
+Auto-select and continue to Phase 2.
+
+**Case C: Multiple Sessions** (count > 1)
+
+List sessions with metadata and prompt user selection:
+```bash
+bash(for dir in .workflow/active/WFS-*/; do
+  session=$(basename "$dir")
+  project=$(jq -r '.project // "Unknown"' "$dir/workflow-session.json" 2>/dev/null)
+  total=$(grep -c "^- \[" "$dir/TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "0")
+  completed=$(grep -c "^- \[x\]" "$dir/TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "0")
+  [ "$total" -gt 0 ] && progress=$((completed * 100 / total)) || progress=0
+  echo "${session} | ${project} | ${completed}/${total} tasks (${progress}%)"
+done)
+```
+
+Use AskUserQuestion to present formatted options (max 4 options shown):
+```javascript
+// If more than 4 sessions, show most recent 4 with "Other" option for manual input
+const sessions = getActiveSessions()  // sorted by last modified
+const displaySessions = sessions.slice(0, 4)
+
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Multiple active sessions detected. Select one:",
+    header: "Session",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: displaySessions.map(s => ({
+      label: s.id,
+      description: `${s.project} | ${s.progress}`
+    }))
+    // Note: User can select "Other" to manually enter session ID
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Input Validation**:
+- If user selects from options: Use selected session ID
+- If user selects "Other" and provides input: Validate session exists
+- If validation fails: Show error and re-prompt or suggest available sessions
+
+Parse user input (supports: number "1", full ID "WFS-auth-system", or partial "auth"), validate selection, and continue to Phase 2.
+
+#### Step 1.3: Load Session Metadata
+```bash
+bash(cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json)
+```
+
+**Output**: Store session metadata in memory
+**DO NOT read task JSONs yet** - defer until execution phase (lazy loading)
+
+**Resume Mode**: This entire phase is skipped when `--resume-session="session-id"` flag is provided.
+
+### Phase 2: Planning Document Validation
+**Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
+
+**Purpose**: Validate planning artifacts exist before execution
+
+**Process**:
+1. **Check IMPL_PLAN.md**: Verify file exists (defer detailed parsing to Phase 4A)
+2. **Check TODO_LIST.md**: Verify file exists (defer reading to Phase 3)
+3. **Validate Task Directory**: Ensure `.task/` contains at least one IMPL-*.json file
+
+**Key Optimization**: Only existence checks here. Actual file reading happens in later phases.
+
+**Resume Mode**: This phase is skipped when `--resume-session` flag is provided. Resume mode entry point is Phase 3.
+
+### Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
+**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes (resume mode entry point)
+
+**Step 0: Update Session Status to Active**
+Before generating TodoWrite, update session status from "planning" to "active":
+```bash
+# Update session status (idempotent - safe to run if already active)
+jq '.status = "active" | .execution_started_at = (.execution_started_at // now | todate)' \
+  .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json > tmp.json && \
+  mv tmp.json .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json
+```
+This ensures the dashboard shows the session as "ACTIVE" during execution.
+
+**Process**:
+1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list from TODO_LIST.md (not from task JSONs)
+   - Parse TODO_LIST.md to extract all tasks with current statuses
+   - Identify first pending task with met dependencies
+   - Generate comprehensive TodoWrite covering entire workflow
+2. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
+3. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md exist and are valid
 
 **Resume Mode Behavior**:
-- Load existing session state directly from `.workflow/{session-id}/`
-- Use session's task files and summaries without discovery
-- Generate TodoWrite from current session progress
-- Proceed immediately to agent execution
+- Load existing TODO_LIST.md directly from `.workflow/active/{session-id}/`
+- Extract current progress from TODO_LIST.md
+- Generate TodoWrite from TODO_LIST.md state
+- Proceed immediately to agent execution (Phase 4)
+
+### Phase 4: Execution Strategy Selection & Task Execution
+**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
+
+**Step 4A: Parse Execution Strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md**
+
+Read IMPL_PLAN.md Section 4 to extract:
+- **Execution Model**: Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles
+- **Parallelization Opportunities**: Which tasks can run in parallel
+- **Serialization Requirements**: Which tasks must run sequentially
+- **Critical Path**: Priority execution order
+
+If IMPL_PLAN.md lacks execution strategy, use intelligent fallback (analyze task structure).
+
+**Step 4B: Execute Tasks with Lazy Loading**
+
+**Key Optimization**: Read task JSON **only when needed** for execution
+
+**Execution Loop Pattern**:
+```
+while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
+  next_task_id = getTodoWriteInProgressTask()
+  task_json = Read(.workflow/active/{session}/.task/{next_task_id}.json)  // Lazy load
+  executeTaskWithAgent(task_json)
+  updateTodoListMarkCompleted(next_task_id)
+  advanceTodoWriteToNextTask()
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Process per Task**:
+1. **Identify Next Task**: From TodoWrite, get the next `in_progress` task ID
+2. **Load Task JSON on Demand**: Read `.task/{task-id}.json` for current task ONLY
+3. **Validate Task Structure**: Ensure all 5 required fields exist (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control)
+4. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with complete context including flow control steps
+5. **Monitor Progress**: Track agent execution and handle errors without user interruption
+6. **Collect Results**: Gather implementation results and outputs
+7. **Continue Workflow**: Identify next pending task from TODO_LIST.md and repeat
+
+**Note**: TODO_LIST.md updates are handled by agents (e.g., code-developer.md), not by the orchestrator.
 
-### Phase 4: Execution
-1. **Pass Task with Flow Control**: Include complete task JSON with `pre_analysis` steps for agent execution
-2. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with complete context including flow control steps
-3. **Monitor Progress**: Track agent execution and handle errors without user interruption
-4. **Collect Results**: Gather implementation results and outputs
-5. **Continue Workflow**: Automatically proceed to next pending task until completion
 
 ### Phase 5: Completion
+**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
+
+**Process**:
 1. **Update Task Status**: Mark completed tasks in JSON files
 2. **Generate Summary**: Create task summary in `.summaries/`
 3. **Update TodoWrite**: Mark current task complete, advance to next
@@ -117,28 +256,53 @@ Step 3: implement_solution [pattern_analysis] [dependency_context] → implement
 5. **Check Workflow Complete**: Verify all tasks are completed
 6. **Auto-Complete Session**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all tasks finished
 
-## Task Discovery & Queue Building
+## Execution Strategy (IMPL_PLAN-Driven)
 
-### Session Discovery Process (Normal Mode)
-```
-├── Check for .active-* markers in .workflow/
-├── If multiple active sessions found → Prompt user to select
-├── Locate selected session's workflow folder
-├── Load selected session's workflow-session.json and IMPL_PLAN.md
-├── Scan selected session's .task/ directory for task JSON files
-├── Analyze task statuses and dependencies for selected session only
-└── Build execution queue of ready tasks from selected session
-```
+### Strategy Priority
 
-### Resume Mode Process (--resume-session flag)
-```
-├── Use provided session-id directly (skip discovery)
-├── Validate .workflow/{session-id}/ directory exists
-├── Load session's workflow-session.json and IMPL_PLAN.md directly
-├── Scan session's .task/ directory for task JSON files
-├── Use existing task statuses and dependencies (no re-analysis needed)
-└── Build execution queue from session state (prioritize pending/in-progress tasks)
-```
+**IMPL_PLAN-Driven Execution (Recommended)**:
+1. **Read IMPL_PLAN.md execution strategy** (Section 4: Implementation Strategy)
+2. **Follow explicit guidance**:
+   - Execution Model (Sequential/Parallel/Phased/TDD)
+   - Parallelization Opportunities (which tasks can run in parallel)
+   - Serialization Requirements (which tasks must run sequentially)
+   - Critical Path (priority execution order)
+3. **Use TODO_LIST.md for status tracking** only
+4. **IMPL_PLAN decides "HOW"**, execute.md implements it
+
+**Intelligent Fallback (When IMPL_PLAN lacks execution details)**:
+1. **Analyze task structure**:
+   - Check `meta.execution_group` in task JSONs
+   - Analyze `depends_on` relationships
+   - Understand task complexity and risk
+2. **Apply smart defaults**:
+   - No dependencies + same execution_group → Parallel
+   - Has dependencies → Sequential (wait for deps)
+   - Critical/high-risk tasks → Sequential
+3. **Conservative approach**: When uncertain, prefer sequential execution
+
+### Execution Models
+
+#### 1. Sequential Execution
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Sequential" OR no clear parallelization guidance
+**Pattern**: Execute tasks one by one in TODO_LIST order
+**TodoWrite**: ONE task marked as `in_progress` at a time
+
+#### 2. Parallel Execution
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Parallel" with clear parallelization opportunities
+**Pattern**: Execute independent task groups concurrently by launching multiple agent instances
+**TodoWrite**: MULTIPLE tasks (in same batch) marked as `in_progress` simultaneously
+**Agent Instantiation**: Launch one agent instance per task (respects ONE AGENT = ONE TASK JSON rule)
+
+#### 3. Phased Execution
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Phased" with phase breakdown
+**Pattern**: Execute tasks in phases, respect phase boundaries
+**TodoWrite**: Within each phase, follow Sequential or Parallel rules
+
+#### 4. Intelligent Fallback
+**When**: IMPL_PLAN lacks execution strategy details
+**Pattern**: Analyze task structure and apply smart defaults
+**TodoWrite**: Follow Sequential or Parallel rules based on analysis
 
 ### Task Status Logic
 ```
@@ -148,327 +312,132 @@ blocked → skip until dependencies clear
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Coordination
-**Comprehensive workflow tracking** with immediate status updates throughout entire execution without user interruption:
 
-#### TodoWrite Workflow Rules
-1. **Initial Creation**: Generate TodoWrite from discovered pending tasks for entire workflow
-   - **Normal Mode**: Create from discovery results
-   - **Resume Mode**: Create from existing session state and current progress
-2. **Single In-Progress**: Mark ONLY ONE task as `in_progress` at a time
-3. **Immediate Updates**: Update status after each task completion without user interruption
-4. **Status Synchronization**: Sync with JSON task files after updates
-5. **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
+### TodoWrite Rules (Unified)
 
-#### Resume Mode TodoWrite Generation
-**Special behavior when `--resume-session` flag is present**:
-- Load existing session progress from `.workflow/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
-- Identify currently in-progress or next pending task
-- Generate TodoWrite starting from interruption point
-- Preserve completed task history in TodoWrite display
-- Focus on remaining pending tasks for execution
+**Rule 1: Initial Creation**
+- **Normal Mode**: Generate TodoWrite from discovered pending tasks for entire workflow
+- **Resume Mode**: Generate from existing session state and current progress
 
-#### TodoWrite Tool Usage
-**Use Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite tool** to track workflow progress in real-time:
+**Rule 2: In-Progress Task Count (Execution-Model-Dependent)**
+- **Sequential execution**: Mark ONLY ONE task as `in_progress` at a time
+- **Parallel batch execution**: Mark ALL tasks in current batch as `in_progress` simultaneously
+- **Execution group indicator**: Show `[execution_group: group-id]` for parallel tasks
 
+**Rule 3: Status Updates**
+- **Immediate Updates**: Update status after each task/batch completion without user interruption
+- **Status Synchronization**: Sync with JSON task files after updates
+- **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
+
+**Rule 4: Workflow Completion Check**
+- When all tasks marked `completed`, auto-call `/workflow:session:complete`
+
+### TodoWrite Tool Usage
+
+**Example 1: Sequential Execution**
 ```javascript
-// Create initial todo list from discovered pending tasks
 TodoWrite({
   todos: [
     {
       content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "pending",
+      status: "in_progress",  // ONE task in progress
       activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema"
     },
     {
       content: "Execute IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
       status: "pending",
       activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Execute TEST-FIX-1: Validate implementation tests [test-fix-agent]",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Executing TEST-FIX-1: Validate implementation tests"
     }
   ]
 });
+```
 
-// Update status as tasks progress - ONLY ONE task should be in_progress at a time
+**Example 2: Parallel Batch Execution**
+```javascript
 TodoWrite({
   todos: [
     {
-      content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
-      status: "in_progress",  // Mark current task as in_progress
-      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema"
+      content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Build Auth API [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-auth-api]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Batch task 1
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Build Auth API"
     },
-    // ... other tasks remain pending
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-1.2: Build User UI [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-ui-comp]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Batch task 2 (running concurrently)
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Build User UI"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-1.3: Setup Database [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-db-schema]",
+      status: "in_progress",  // Batch task 3 (running concurrently)
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.3: Setup Database"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-2.1: Integration Tests [test-fix-agent] [depends_on: IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2, IMPL-1.3]",
+      status: "pending",  // Next batch (waits for current batch completion)
+      activeForm: "Executing IMPL-2.1: Integration Tests"
+    }
   ]
 });
 ```
 
-**TodoWrite Integration Rules**:
-- **Continuous Workflow Tracking**: Use TodoWrite tool throughout entire workflow execution
-- **Real-time Updates**: Immediate progress tracking without user interruption
-- **Single Active Task**: Only ONE task marked as `in_progress` at any time
-- **Immediate Completion**: Mark tasks `completed` immediately after finishing
-- **Status Sync**: Sync TodoWrite status with JSON task files after each update
-- **Full Execution**: Continue TodoWrite tracking until all workflow tasks complete
-- **Workflow Completion Check**: When all tasks marked `completed`, auto-call `/workflow:session:complete`
+## Agent Execution Pattern
 
-#### TODO_LIST.md Update Timing
-- **Before Agent Launch**: Update TODO_LIST.md to mark task as `in_progress` (⚠️)
-- **After Task Complete**: Update TODO_LIST.md to mark as `completed` (✅), advance to next
-- **On Error**: Keep as `in_progress` in TODO_LIST.md, add error note
-- **Workflow Complete**: When all tasks completed, call `/workflow:session:complete`
-- **Session End**: Sync all TODO_LIST.md statuses with JSON task files
+### Flow Control Execution
+**[FLOW_CONTROL]** marker indicates task JSON contains `flow_control.pre_analysis` steps for context preparation.
 
-### 3. Agent Context Management
-**Comprehensive context preparation** for autonomous agent execution:
+**Note**: Orchestrator does NOT execute flow control steps - Agent interprets and executes them autonomously.
 
-#### Context Sources (Priority Order)
-1. **Complete Task JSON**: Full task definition including all fields and artifacts
-2. **Artifacts Context**: Brainstorming outputs and synthesis specifications from task.context.artifacts
-3. **Flow Control Context**: Accumulated outputs from pre_analysis steps (including artifact loading)
-4. **Dependency Summaries**: Previous task completion summaries
-5. **Session Context**: Workflow paths and session metadata
-6. **Inherited Context**: Parent task context and shared variables
+### Agent Prompt Template
+**Dynamic Generation**: Before agent invocation, read task JSON and extract key requirements.
 
-#### Context Assembly Process
-```
-1. Load Task JSON → Base context (including artifacts array)
-2. Load Artifacts → Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs
-3. Execute Flow Control → Accumulated context (with artifact loading steps)
-4. Load Dependencies → Dependency context
-5. Prepare Session Paths → Session context
-6. Combine All → Complete agent context with artifact integration
-```
-
-#### Agent Context Package Structure
-```json
-{
-  "task": { /* Complete task JSON with artifacts array */ },
-  "artifacts": {
-    "synthesis_specification": { "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md", "priority": "highest" },
-    "topic_framework": { "path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/topic-framework.md", "priority": "medium" },
-    "role_analyses": [ /* Individual role analysis files */ ],
-    "available_artifacts": [ /* All detected brainstorming artifacts */ ]
-  },
-  "flow_context": {
-    "step_outputs": {
-      "synthesis_specification": "...",
-      "individual_artifacts": "...",
-      "pattern_analysis": "...",
-      "dependency_context": "..."
-    }
-  },
-  "session": {
-    "workflow_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/",
-    "brainstorming_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/.brainstorming/",
-    "todo_list_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/TODO_LIST.md",
-    "summaries_dir": ".workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/",
-    "task_json_path": ".workflow/WFS-session/.task/IMPL-1.1.json"
-  },
-  "dependencies": [ /* Task summaries from depends_on */ ],
-  "inherited": { /* Parent task context */ }
-}
-```
-
-#### Context Validation Rules
-- **Task JSON Complete**: All 5 fields present and valid, including artifacts array in context
-- **Artifacts Available**: Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs accessible
-- **Flow Control Ready**: All pre_analysis steps completed including artifact loading steps
-- **Dependencies Loaded**: All depends_on summaries available
-- **Session Paths Valid**: All workflow paths exist and accessible, including .brainstorming directory
-- **Agent Assignment**: Valid agent type specified in meta.agent
-
-### 4. Agent Execution Pattern
-**Structured agent invocation** with complete context and clear instructions:
-
-#### Agent Prompt Template
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
-     prompt="**TASK EXECUTION WITH FULL JSON LOADING**
+     run_in_background=false,
+     prompt="Execute task: {task.title}
 
-     ## STEP 1: Load Complete Task JSON
-     **MANDATORY**: First load the complete task JSON from: {session.task_json_path}
+     {[FLOW_CONTROL]}
 
-     cat {session.task_json_path}
+     **Task Objectives** (from task JSON):
+     {task.context.objective}
 
-     **CRITICAL**: Validate all 5 required fields are present:
-     - id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control
+     **Expected Deliverables** (from task JSON):
+     {task.context.deliverables}
 
-     ## STEP 2: Task Definition (From Loaded JSON)
-     **ID**: Use id field from JSON
-     **Title**: Use title field from JSON
-     **Type**: Use meta.type field from JSON
-     **Agent**: Use meta.agent field from JSON
-     **Status**: Verify status is pending or active
+     **Quality Standards** (from task JSON):
+     {task.context.acceptance_criteria}
 
-     ## STEP 3: Flow Control Execution (if flow_control.pre_analysis exists)
-     **AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute pre_analysis steps sequentially from loaded JSON:
+     **MANDATORY FIRST STEPS**:
+     1. Read complete task JSON: {session.task_json_path}
+     2. Load context package: {session.context_package_path}
 
-     **PRIORITY: Artifact Loading Steps First**
-     1. **Load Synthesis Specification** (if present): Priority artifact loading for consolidated design
-     2. **Load Individual Artifacts** (fallback): Load role-specific brainstorming outputs if synthesis unavailable
-     3. **Execute Remaining Steps**: Continue with other pre_analysis steps
 
-     For each step in flow_control.pre_analysis array:
-     1. Execute step.command/commands with variable substitution (support both single command and commands array)
-     2. Store output to step.output_to variable
-     3. Handle errors per step.on_error strategy (skip_optional, fail, retry_once)
-     4. Pass accumulated variables to next step including artifact context
+     **Session Paths**:
+     - Workflow Dir: {session.workflow_dir}
+     - TODO List: {session.todo_list_path}
+     - Summaries Dir: {session.summaries_dir}
+     - Context Package: {session.context_package_path}
 
-     **Special Artifact Loading Commands**:
-     - Use `bash(ls path 2>/dev/null || echo 'file not found')` for artifact existence checks
-     - Use `Read(path)` for loading artifact content
-     - Use `find` commands for discovering multiple artifact files
-     - Reference artifacts in subsequent steps using output variables: [synthesis_specification], [individual_artifacts]
-
-     ## STEP 4: Implementation Context (From JSON context field)
-     **Requirements**: Use context.requirements array from JSON
-     **Focus Paths**: Use context.focus_paths array from JSON
-     **Acceptance Criteria**: Use context.acceptance array from JSON
-     **Dependencies**: Use context.depends_on array from JSON
-     **Parent Context**: Use context.inherited object from JSON
-     **Artifacts**: Use context.artifacts array from JSON (synthesis specifications, brainstorming outputs)
-     **Target Files**: Use flow_control.target_files array from JSON
-     **Implementation Approach**: Use flow_control.implementation_approach object from JSON (with artifact integration)
-
-     ## STEP 5: Session Context (Provided by workflow:execute)
-     **Workflow Directory**: {session.workflow_dir}
-     **TODO List Path**: {session.todo_list_path}
-     **Summaries Directory**: {session.summaries_dir}
-     **Task JSON Path**: {session.task_json_path}
-     **Flow Context**: {flow_context.step_outputs}
-
-     ## STEP 6: Agent Completion Requirements
-     1. **Load Task JSON**: Read and validate complete task structure
-     2. **Execute Flow Control**: Run all pre_analysis steps if present
-     3. **Implement Solution**: Follow implementation_approach from JSON
-     4. **Update Progress**: Mark task status in JSON as completed
-     5. **Update TODO List**: Update TODO_LIST.md at provided path
-     6. **Generate Summary**: Create completion summary in summaries directory
-     7. **Check Workflow Complete**: After task completion, check if all workflow tasks done
-     8. **Auto-Complete Session**: If all tasks completed, call SlashCommand(\"/workflow:session:complete\")
-
-     **JSON UPDATE COMMAND**:
-     Update task status to completed using jq:
-     jq '.status = \"completed\"' {session.task_json_path} > temp.json && mv temp.json {session.task_json_path}
-
-     **WORKFLOW COMPLETION CHECK**:
-     After updating task status, check if workflow is complete:
-     total_tasks=\$(find .workflow/*/\.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-     completed_tasks=\$(find .workflow/*/\.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-     if [ \$total_tasks -eq \$completed_tasks ]; then
-       SlashCommand(command=\"/workflow:session:complete\")
-     fi"),
-     description="Execute task with full JSON loading and validation")
+     **Success Criteria**: Complete all objectives, meet all quality standards, deliver all outputs as specified above.",
+     description="Executing: {task.title}")
 ```
 
-#### Agent JSON Loading Specification
-**MANDATORY AGENT PROTOCOL**: All agents must follow this exact loading sequence:
-
-1. **JSON Loading**: First action must be `cat {session.task_json_path}`
-2. **Field Validation**: Verify all 5 required fields exist: `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, `flow_control`
-3. **Structure Parsing**: Parse nested fields correctly:
-   - `meta.type` and `meta.agent` (NOT flat `task_type`)
-   - `context.requirements`, `context.focus_paths`, `context.acceptance`
-   - `context.depends_on`, `context.inherited`
-   - `flow_control.pre_analysis` array, `flow_control.target_files`
-4. **Flow Control Execution**: If `flow_control.pre_analysis` exists, execute steps sequentially
-5. **Status Management**: Update JSON status upon completion
-
-**JSON Field Reference**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-1.2",
-  "title": "Task title",
-  "status": "pending|active|completed|blocked",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
-    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@general-purpose"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": ["req1", "req2"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/path1", "src/path2"],
-    "acceptance": ["criteria1", "criteria2"],
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-1.1"],
-    "inherited": { "from": "parent", "context": ["info"] },
-    "artifacts": [
-      {
-        "type": "synthesis_specification",
-        "source": "brainstorm_synthesis",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md",
-        "priority": "highest",
-        "contains": "complete_integrated_specification"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "individual_role_analysis",
-        "source": "brainstorm_roles",
-        "path": ".workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis.md",
-        "priority": "low",
-        "contains": "role_specific_analysis_fallback"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
-        "action": "Load consolidated synthesis specification from brainstorming",
-        "commands": [
-          "bash(ls .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'synthesis specification not found')",
-          "Read(.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "step_name",
-        "command": "bash_command",
-        "output_to": "variable",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional|fail|retry_once"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": {
-      "task_description": "Implement following consolidated synthesis specification...",
-      "modification_points": ["Apply synthesis specification requirements..."]
-    },
-    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-#### Execution Flow
-1. **Load Task JSON**: Agent reads and validates complete JSON structure
-2. **Execute Flow Control**: Agent runs pre_analysis steps if present
-3. **Prepare Implementation**: Agent uses implementation_approach from JSON
-4. **Launch Implementation**: Agent follows focus_paths and target_files
-5. **Update Status**: Agent marks JSON status as completed
-6. **Generate Summary**: Agent creates completion summary
-
-#### Agent Assignment Rules
+### Agent Assignment Rules
 ```
 meta.agent specified → Use specified agent
 meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
   - "feature" → @code-developer
   - "test-gen" → @code-developer
   - "test-fix" → @test-fix-agent
-  - "review" → @general-purpose
+  - "review" → @universal-executor
   - "docs" → @doc-generator
 ```
 
-#### Error Handling During Execution
-- **Agent Failure**: Retry once with adjusted context
-- **Flow Control Error**: Skip optional steps, fail on critical
-- **Context Missing**: Reload from JSON files and retry
-- **Timeout**: Mark as blocked, continue with next task
-
 ## Workflow File Structure Reference
 ```
-.workflow/WFS-[topic-slug]/
+.workflow/active/WFS-[topic-slug]/
 ├── workflow-session.json     # Session state and metadata
 ├── IMPL_PLAN.md             # Planning document and requirements
-├── TODO_LIST.md             # Progress tracking (auto-updated)
+├── TODO_LIST.md             # Progress tracking (updated by agents)
 ├── .task/                   # Task definitions (JSON only)
 │   ├── IMPL-1.json          # Main task definitions
 │   └── IMPL-1.1.json        # Subtask definitions
@@ -476,78 +445,26 @@ meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
 │   ├── IMPL-1-summary.md    # Task completion details
 │   └── IMPL-1.1-summary.md  # Subtask completion details
 └── .process/                # Planning artifacts
+    ├── context-package.json # Smart context package
     └── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md  # Planning analysis results
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling & Recovery
 
-### Discovery Phase Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution | Command |
-|-------|-------|------------|---------|
-| No active session | No `.active-*` markers found | Create or resume session | `/workflow:plan "project"` |
-| Multiple sessions | Multiple `.active-*` markers | Select specific session | Manual choice prompt |
-| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure | `/workflow:session:status --validate` |
-| Missing task files | Broken task references | Regenerate tasks | `/task:create` or repair |
+### Common Errors & Recovery
 
-### Execution Phase Errors
-| Error | Cause | Recovery Strategy | Max Attempts |
-|-------|-------|------------------|--------------|
+| Error Type | Cause | Recovery Strategy | Max Attempts |
+|-----------|-------|------------------|--------------|
+| **Discovery Errors** |
+| No active session | No sessions in `.workflow/active/` | Create or resume session: `/workflow:plan "project"` | N/A |
+| Multiple sessions | Multiple sessions in `.workflow/active/` | Prompt user selection | N/A |
+| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure or validate files | N/A |
+| **Execution Errors** |
 | Agent failure | Agent crash/timeout | Retry with simplified context | 2 |
 | Flow control error | Command failure | Skip optional, fail critical | 1 per step |
 | Context loading error | Missing dependencies | Reload from JSON, use defaults | 3 |
 | JSON file corruption | File system issues | Restore from backup/recreate | 1 |
 
-### Recovery Procedures
-
-#### Session Recovery
-```bash
-# Check session integrity
-find .workflow -name ".active-*" | while read marker; do
-  session=$(basename "$marker" | sed 's/^\.active-//')
-  if [ ! -d ".workflow/$session" ]; then
-    echo "Removing orphaned marker: $marker"
-    rm "$marker"
-  fi
-done
-
-# Recreate corrupted session files
-if [ ! -f ".workflow/$session/workflow-session.json" ]; then
-  echo '{"session_id":"'$session'","status":"active"}' > ".workflow/$session/workflow-session.json"
-fi
-```
-
-#### Task Recovery
-```bash
-# Validate task JSON integrity
-for task_file in .workflow/$session/.task/*.json; do
-  if ! jq empty "$task_file" 2>/dev/null; then
-    echo "Corrupted task file: $task_file"
-    # Backup and regenerate or restore from backup
-  fi
-done
-
-# Fix missing dependencies
-missing_deps=$(jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' .workflow/$session/.task/*.json | sort -u)
-for dep in $missing_deps; do
-  if [ ! -f ".workflow/$session/.task/$dep.json" ]; then
-    echo "Missing dependency: $dep - creating placeholder"
-  fi
-done
-```
-
-#### Context Recovery
-```bash
-# Reload context from available sources
-if [ -f ".workflow/$session/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md" ]; then
-  echo "Reloading planning context..."
-fi
-
-# Restore from documentation if available
-if [ -d ".workflow/docs/" ]; then
-  echo "Using documentation context as fallback..."
-fi
-```
-
 ### Error Prevention
 - **Pre-flight Checks**: Validate session integrity before execution
 - **Backup Strategy**: Create task snapshots before major operations
@@ -555,16 +472,3 @@ fi
 - **Dependency Validation**: Check all depends_on references exist
 - **Context Verification**: Ensure all required context is available
 
-## Usage Examples
-
-### Basic Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:execute          # Execute all pending tasks autonomously
-/workflow:session:status           # Check progress
-/task:execute IMPL-1.2     # Execute specific task
-```
-
-### Integration
-- **Planning**: `/workflow:plan` → `/workflow:execute` → `/workflow:review`
-- **Recovery**: `/workflow:status --validate` → `/workflow:execute`
-

.claude/commands/workflow/init.md

@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+---
+name: init
+description: Initialize project-level state with intelligent project analysis using cli-explore-agent
+argument-hint: "[--regenerate]"
+examples:
+  - /workflow:init
+  - /workflow:init --regenerate
+---
+
+# Workflow Init Command (/workflow:init)
+
+## Overview
+Initialize `.workflow/project.json` with comprehensive project understanding by delegating analysis to **cli-explore-agent**.
+
+**Note**: This command may be called by other workflow commands. Upon completion, return immediately to continue the calling workflow without interrupting the task flow.
+
+## Usage
+```bash
+/workflow:init                 # Initialize (skip if exists)
+/workflow:init --regenerate    # Force regeneration
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Parse --regenerate flag → regenerate = true | false
+
+Decision:
+   ├─ EXISTS + no --regenerate → Exit: "Already initialized"
+   ├─ EXISTS + --regenerate → Backup existing → Continue analysis
+   └─ NOT_FOUND → Continue analysis
+
+Analysis Flow:
+   ├─ Get project metadata (name, root)
+   ├─ Invoke cli-explore-agent
+   │   ├─ Structural scan (get_modules_by_depth.sh, find, wc)
+   │   ├─ Semantic analysis (Gemini CLI)
+   │   ├─ Synthesis and merge
+   │   └─ Write .workflow/project.json
+   └─ Display summary
+
+Output:
+   └─ .workflow/project.json (+ .backup if regenerate)
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Step 1: Parse Input and Check Existing State
+
+**Parse --regenerate flag**:
+```javascript
+const regenerate = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--regenerate')
+```
+
+**Check existing state**:
+
+```bash
+bash(test -f .workflow/project.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND")
+```
+
+**If EXISTS and no --regenerate**: Exit early
+```
+Project already initialized at .workflow/project.json
+Use /workflow:init --regenerate to rebuild
+Use /workflow:status --project to view state
+```
+
+### Step 2: Get Project Metadata
+
+```bash
+bash(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)")
+bash(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow)
+```
+
+### Step 3: Invoke cli-explore-agent
+
+**For --regenerate**: Backup and preserve existing data
+```bash
+bash(cp .workflow/project.json .workflow/project.json.backup)
+```
+
+**Delegate analysis to agent**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Deep project analysis",
+  prompt=`
+Analyze project for workflow initialization and generate .workflow/project.json.
+
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
+1. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/project-json-schema.json (get schema reference)
+2. Execute: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (get project structure)
+
+## Task
+Generate complete project.json with:
+- project_name: ${projectName}
+- initialized_at: current ISO timestamp
+- overview: {description, technology_stack, architecture, key_components}
+- features: ${regenerate ? 'preserve from backup' : '[] (empty)'}
+- development_index: ${regenerate ? 'preserve from backup' : '{feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: []}'}
+- statistics: ${regenerate ? 'preserve from backup' : '{total_features: 0, total_sessions: 0, last_updated}'}
+- _metadata: {initialized_by: "cli-explore-agent", analysis_timestamp, analysis_mode}
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+
+**Technology Stack**:
+- Languages: File counts, mark primary
+- Frameworks: From package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, etc.
+- Build tools: npm, cargo, maven, webpack, vite
+- Test frameworks: jest, pytest, go test, junit
+
+**Architecture**:
+- Style: MVC, microservices, layered (from structure & imports)
+- Layers: presentation, business-logic, data-access
+- Patterns: singleton, factory, repository
+- Key components: 5-10 modules {name, path, description, importance}
+
+## Execution
+1. Structural scan: get_modules_by_depth.sh, find, wc -l
+2. Semantic analysis: Gemini for patterns/architecture
+3. Synthesis: Merge findings
+4. ${regenerate ? 'Merge with preserved features/development_index/statistics from .workflow/project.json.backup' : ''}
+5. Write JSON: Write('.workflow/project.json', jsonContent)
+6. Report: Return brief completion summary
+
+Project root: ${projectRoot}
+`
+)
+```
+
+### Step 4: Display Summary
+
+```javascript
+const projectJson = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/project.json'));
+
+console.log(`
+✓ Project initialized successfully
+
+## Project Overview
+Name: ${projectJson.project_name}
+Description: ${projectJson.overview.description}
+
+### Technology Stack
+Languages: ${projectJson.overview.technology_stack.languages.map(l => l.name).join(', ')}
+Frameworks: ${projectJson.overview.technology_stack.frameworks.join(', ')}
+
+### Architecture
+Style: ${projectJson.overview.architecture.style}
+Components: ${projectJson.overview.key_components.length} core modules
+
+---
+Project state: .workflow/project.json
+${regenerate ? 'Backup: .workflow/project.json.backup' : ''}
+`);
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Agent Failure**: Fall back to basic initialization with placeholder overview
+**Missing Tools**: Agent uses Qwen fallback or bash-only
+**Empty Project**: Create minimal JSON with all gaps identified

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/close.md

@@ -1,142 +0,0 @@
----
-name: close
-description: Close a completed or obsolete workflow issue
-usage: /workflow:issue:close <issue-id> [reason]
-
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:close ISS-001
-  - /workflow:issue:close ISS-001 "Feature implemented in PR #42"
-  - /workflow:issue:close ISS-002 "Duplicate of ISS-001"
----
-
-# Close Workflow Issue (/workflow:issue:close)
-
-## Purpose
-Mark an issue as closed/resolved with optional reason documentation.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:close <issue-id> ["reason"]
-```
-
-## Closing Process
-
-### Quick Close
-Simple closure without reason:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:close ISS-001
-```
-
-### Close with Reason
-Include closure reason:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:close ISS-001 "Feature implemented in PR #42"
-/workflow/issue/close ISS-002 "Duplicate of ISS-001"  
-/workflow/issue/close ISS-003 "No longer relevant"
-```
-
-### Interactive Close (Default)
-Without reason, prompts for details:
-```
-Closing Issue ISS-001: Add OAuth2 social login support
-Current Status: Open | Priority: High | Type: Feature
-
-Why is this issue being closed?
-1. ✅ Completed - Issue resolved successfully
-2. 🔄 Duplicate - Duplicate of another issue
-3. ❌ Invalid - Issue is invalid or not applicable  
-4. 🚫 Won't Fix - Decided not to implement
-5. 📝 Custom reason
-
-Choice: _
-```
-
-## Closure Categories
-
-### Completed (Default)
-- Issue was successfully resolved
-- Implementation finished
-- Requirements met
-- Ready for review/testing
-
-### Duplicate
-- Same as existing issue
-- Consolidated into another issue
-- Reference to primary issue provided
-
-### Invalid
-- Issue description unclear
-- Not a valid problem/request
-- Outside project scope
-- Misunderstanding resolved
-
-### Won't Fix
-- Decided not to implement
-- Business decision to decline
-- Technical constraints prevent
-- Priority too low
-
-### Custom Reason
-- Specific project context
-- Detailed explanation needed
-- Complex closure scenario
-
-## Closure Effects
-
-### Status Update
-- Changes status from "open" to "closed"
-- Records closure details
-- Saves closure reason and category
-
-### Integration Cleanup
-- Unlinks from workflow tasks (if integrated)
-- Removes from active TodoWrite items
-- Updates session statistics
-
-### History Preservation
-- Maintains full issue history
-- Records closure details
-- Preserves for future reference
-
-## Session Updates
-
-### Statistics
-Updates session issue counts:
-- Decrements open issues
-- Increments closed issues
-- Updates completion metrics
-
-### Progress Tracking
-- Updates workflow progress
-- Refreshes TodoWrite status
-- Updates session health metrics
-
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Issue closure confirmation
-- Closure reason and category
-- Updated session statistics  
-- Related actions taken
-
-## Reopening
-Closed issues can be reopened:
-```bash
-/workflow/issue/update ISS-001 --status=open
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Issue not found**: Lists available open issues
-- **Already closed**: Shows current status and closure info
-- **Integration conflicts**: Handles task unlinking gracefully
-- **File errors**: Validates and repairs issue files
-
-## Archive Management
-Closed issues:
-- Remain in .issues/ directory
-- Are excluded from default listings
-- Can be viewed with `/workflow/issue/list --closed`
-- Maintain full searchability
-
----
-
-**Result**: Issue properly closed with documented reason and session cleanup

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/create.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
----
-name: create
-description: Create a new issue or change request
-usage: /workflow:issue:create "issue description"
-
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:create "Add OAuth2 social login support"
-  - /workflow:issue:create "Fix user avatar security vulnerability"
----
-
-# Create Workflow Issue (/workflow:issue:create)
-
-## Purpose
-Create a new issue or change request within the current workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:create "issue description"
-```
-
-## Automatic Behavior
-
-### Issue ID Generation
-- Generates unique ID: ISS-001, ISS-002, etc.
-- Sequential numbering within session
-- Stored in session's .issues/ directory
-
-### Type Detection
-Automatically detects issue type from description:
-- **Bug**: Contains words like "fix", "error", "bug", "broken"
-- **Feature**: Contains words like "add", "implement", "create", "new"
-- **Optimization**: Contains words like "improve", "optimize", "performance"
-- **Documentation**: Contains words like "document", "readme", "docs"
-- **Refactor**: Contains words like "refactor", "cleanup", "restructure"
-
-### Priority Assessment
-Auto-assigns priority based on keywords:
-- **Critical**: "critical", "urgent", "blocker", "security"
-- **High**: "important", "major", "significant"
-- **Medium**: Default for most issues
-- **Low**: "minor", "enhancement", "nice-to-have"
-
-## Issue Storage
-
-### File Structure
-```
-.workflow/WFS-[session]/.issues/
-├── ISS-001.json          # Issue metadata
-├── ISS-002.json          # Another issue
-└── issue-registry.json   # Issue index
-```
-
-### Issue Metadata
-Each issue stores:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "ISS-001",
-  "title": "Add OAuth2 social login support",
-  "type": "feature",
-  "priority": "high",
-  "status": "open",
-  "created_at": "2025-09-08T10:00:00Z",
-  "category": "authentication",
-  "estimated_impact": "medium",
-  "blocking": false,
-  "session_id": "WFS-oauth-integration"
-}
-```
-
-## Session Integration
-
-### Active Session Check
-- Uses current active session (marker file)
-- Creates .issues/ directory if needed
-- Updates session's issue tracking
-
-### TodoWrite Integration
-Optionally adds to task list:
-- Creates todo for issue investigation
-- Links issue to implementation tasks
-- Updates progress tracking
-
-## Output
-Displays:
-- Generated issue ID
-- Detected type and priority
-- Storage location
-- Integration status
-- Quick actions available
-
-## Quick Actions
-After creation:
-- **View**: `/workflow:issue:list`
-- **Update**: `/workflow:issue:update ISS-001`
-- **Integrate**: Link to workflow tasks
-- **Close**: `/workflow:issue:close ISS-001`
-
-## Error Handling
-- **No active session**: Prompts to start session first
-- **Directory creation**: Handles permission issues
-- **Duplicate description**: Warns about similar issues
-- **Invalid description**: Prompts for meaningful description
-
----
-
-**Result**: New issue created and ready for management within workflow

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/list.md

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
----
-name: list
-description: List and filter workflow issues
-usage: /workflow:issue:list
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:list
-  - /workflow:issue:list --open
-  - /workflow:issue:list --priority=high
----
-
-# List Workflow Issues (/workflow:issue:list)
-
-## Purpose
-Display all issues and change requests within the current workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:list [filter]
-```
-
-## Optional Filters
-Simple keyword-based filtering:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:list --open           # Only open issues
-/workflow:issue:list --closed         # Only closed issues
-/workflow:issue:list --critical       # Critical priority
-/workflow:issue:list --high           # High priority
-/workflow:issue:list --bug            # Bug type issues
-/workflow:issue:list --feature        # Feature type issues
-/workflow:issue:list --blocking       # Blocking issues only
-```
-
-## Display Format
-
-### Open Issues
-```
-🔴 ISS-001: Add OAuth2 social login support
-   Type: Feature | Priority: High | Created: 2025-09-07
-   Status: Open | Impact: Medium
-   
-🔴 ISS-002: Fix user avatar security vulnerability  
-   Type: Bug | Priority: Critical | Created: 2025-09-08
-   Status: Open | Impact: High | 🚫 BLOCKING
-```
-
-### Closed Issues
-```
-✅ ISS-003: Update authentication documentation
-   Type: Documentation | Priority: Low
-   Status: Closed | Completed: 2025-09-05
-   Reason: Documentation updated in PR #45
-```
-
-### Integrated Issues
-```
-🔗 ISS-004: Implement rate limiting
-   Type: Feature | Priority: Medium
-   Status: Integrated → IMPL-003
-   Integrated: 2025-09-06 | Task: IMPL-3.json
-```
-
-## Summary Stats
-```
-📊 Issue Summary for WFS-oauth-integration:
-   Total: 4 issues
-   🔴 Open: 2 | ✅ Closed: 1 | 🔗 Integrated: 1
-   🚫 Blocking: 1 | ⚡ Critical: 1 | 📈 High: 1
-```
-
-## Empty State
-If no issues exist:
-```
-No issues found for current session.
-
-Create your first issue:
-/workflow:issue:create "describe the issue or request"
-```
-
-## Quick Actions
-For each issue, shows available actions:
-- **Update**: `/workflow:issue:update ISS-001`
-- **Integrate**: Link to workflow tasks  
-- **Close**: `/workflow:issue:close ISS-001`
-- **View Details**: Full issue information
-
-## Session Context
-- Lists issues from current active session
-- Shows session name and directory
-- Indicates if .issues/ directory exists
-
-## Sorting
-Issues are sorted by:
-1. Blocking status (blocking first)
-2. Priority (critical → high → medium → low)
-3. Creation date (newest first)
-
-## Performance
-- Fast loading from JSON files
-- Cached issue registry
-- Efficient filtering
-
----
-
-**Result**: Complete overview of all workflow issues with their current status

.claude/commands/workflow/issue/update.md

@@ -1,135 +0,0 @@
----
-name: update
-description: Update an existing workflow issue
-usage: /workflow:issue:update <issue-id> [changes]
-
-examples:
-  - /workflow:issue:update ISS-001
-  - /workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --priority=critical
-  - /workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --status=closed
----
-
-# Update Workflow Issue (/workflow:issue:update)
-
-## Purpose
-Modify attributes and status of an existing workflow issue.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:update <issue-id> [options]
-```
-
-## Quick Updates
-Simple attribute changes:
-```bash
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --priority=critical
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --status=closed
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --blocking
-/workflow:issue:update ISS-001 --type=bug
-```
-
-## Interactive Mode (Default)
-Without options, opens interactive editor:
-```
-Issue ISS-001: Add OAuth2 social login support
-Current Status: Open | Priority: High | Type: Feature
-
-What would you like to update?
-1. Status (open → closed/integrated)
-2. Priority (high → critical/medium/low)  
-3. Type (feature → bug/optimization/etc)
-4. Description
-5. Add comment
-6. Toggle blocking status
-7. Cancel
-
-Choice: _
-```
-
-## Available Updates
-
-### Status Changes
-- **open** → **closed**: Issue resolved
-- **open** → **integrated**: Linked to workflow task
-- **closed** → **open**: Reopen issue
-- **integrated** → **open**: Unlink from tasks
-
-### Priority Levels
-- **critical**: Urgent, blocking progress
-- **high**: Important, should address soon
-- **medium**: Standard priority
-- **low**: Nice-to-have, can defer
-
-### Issue Types  
-- **bug**: Something broken that needs fixing
-- **feature**: New functionality to implement
-- **optimization**: Performance or efficiency improvement
-- **refactor**: Code structure improvement
-- **documentation**: Documentation updates
-
-### Additional Options
-- **blocking/non-blocking**: Whether issue blocks progress
-- **description**: Update issue description
-- **comments**: Add notes and updates
-
-## Update Process
-
-### Validation
-- Verifies issue exists in current session
-- Checks valid status transitions
-- Validates priority and type values
-
-### Change Tracking
-- Records update details
-- Tracks who made changes
-- Maintains change history
-
-### File Updates
-- Updates ISS-XXX.json file
-- Refreshes issue-registry.json
-- Updates session statistics
-
-## Change History
-Maintains audit trail:
-```json
-{
-  "changes": [
-    {
-      "field": "priority",
-      "old_value": "high",
-      "new_value": "critical",
-      "reason": "Security implications discovered"
-    }
-  ]
-}
-```
-
-## Integration Effects
-
-### Task Integration
-When status changes to "integrated":
-- Links to workflow task (optional)
-- Updates task context with issue reference
-- Creates bidirectional linking
-
-### Session Updates
-- Updates session issue statistics
-- Refreshes TodoWrite if applicable
-- Updates workflow progress tracking
-
-## Output
-Shows:
-- What was changed
-- Before and after values
-- Integration status
-- Available next actions
-
-## Error Handling
-- **Issue not found**: Lists available issues
-- **Invalid status**: Shows valid transitions
-- **Permission errors**: Clear error messages
-- **File corruption**: Validates and repairs
-
----
-
-**Result**: Issue successfully updated with change tracking and integration

.claude/commands/workflow/lite-execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,792 @@
+---
+name: lite-execute
+description: Execute tasks based on in-memory plan, prompt description, or file content
+argument-hint: "[--in-memory] [\"task description\"|file-path]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Lite-Execute Command (/workflow:lite-execute)
+
+## Overview
+
+Flexible task execution command supporting three input modes: in-memory plan (from lite-plan), direct prompt description, or file content. Handles execution orchestration, progress tracking, and optional code review.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Multi-mode input (in-memory plan, prompt description, or file path)
+- Execution orchestration (Agent or Codex) with full context
+- Live progress tracking via TodoWrite at execution call level
+- Optional code review with selected tool (Gemini, Agent, or custom)
+- Context continuity across multiple executions
+- Intelligent format detection (Enhanced Task JSON vs plain text)
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-execute [FLAGS] <INPUT>
+
+# Flags
+--in-memory                Use plan from memory (called by lite-plan)
+
+# Arguments
+<input>                    Task description string, or path to file (required)
+```
+
+## Input Modes
+
+### Mode 1: In-Memory Plan
+
+**Trigger**: Called by lite-plan after Phase 4 approval with `--in-memory` flag
+
+**Input Source**: `executionContext` global variable set by lite-plan
+
+**Content**: Complete execution context (see Data Structures section)
+
+**Behavior**:
+- Skip execution method selection (already set by lite-plan)
+- Directly proceed to execution with full context
+- All planning artifacts available (exploration, clarifications, plan)
+
+### Mode 2: Prompt Description
+
+**Trigger**: User calls with task description string
+
+**Input**: Simple task description (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
+
+**Behavior**:
+- Store prompt as `originalUserInput`
+- Create simple execution plan from prompt
+- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Agent/Other)
+- Proceed to execution with `originalUserInput` included
+
+**User Interaction**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "Select execution method:",
+      header: "Execution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+        { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Enable code review after execution?",
+      header: "Code Review",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Skip", description: "No review" },
+        { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+### Mode 3: File Content
+
+**Trigger**: User calls with file path
+
+**Input**: Path to file containing task description or plan.json
+
+**Step 1: Read and Detect Format**
+
+```javascript
+fileContent = Read(filePath)
+
+// Attempt JSON parsing
+try {
+  jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
+
+  // Check if plan.json from lite-plan session
+  if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.tasks) {
+    planObject = jsonData
+    originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
+    isPlanJson = true
+  } else {
+    // Valid JSON but not plan.json - treat as plain text
+    originalUserInput = fileContent
+    isPlanJson = false
+  }
+} catch {
+  // Not valid JSON - treat as plain text prompt
+  originalUserInput = fileContent
+  isPlanJson = false
+}
+```
+
+**Step 2: Create Execution Plan**
+
+If `isPlanJson === true`:
+- Use `planObject` directly
+- User selects execution method and code review
+
+If `isPlanJson === false`:
+- Treat file content as prompt (same behavior as Mode 2)
+- Create simple execution plan from content
+
+**Step 3: User Interaction**
+
+- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool
+- Proceed to execution with full context
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --in-memory flag → Mode 1: Load executionContext → Skip user selection
+      ├─ Ends with .md/.json/.txt → Mode 3: Read file → Detect format
+      │   ├─ Valid plan.json → Use planObject → User selects method + review
+      │   └─ Not plan.json → Treat as prompt → User selects method + review
+      └─ Other → Mode 2: Prompt description → User selects method + review
+
+Execution:
+   ├─ Step 1: Initialize result tracking (previousExecutionResults = [])
+   ├─ Step 2: Task grouping & batch creation
+   │   ├─ Extract explicit depends_on (no file/keyword inference)
+   │   ├─ Group: independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+   │   ├─ Group: dependent tasks → sequential phases (respect dependencies)
+   │   └─ Create TodoWrite list for batches
+   ├─ Step 3: Launch execution
+   │   ├─ Phase 1: All independent tasks (⚡ single batch, concurrent)
+   │   └─ Phase 2+: Dependent tasks by dependency order
+   ├─ Step 4: Track progress (TodoWrite updates per batch)
+   └─ Step 5: Code review (if codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip")
+
+Output:
+   └─ Execution complete with results in previousExecutionResults[]
+```
+
+## Detailed Execution Steps
+
+### Step 1: Initialize Execution Tracking
+
+**Operations**:
+- Initialize result tracking for multi-execution scenarios
+- Set up `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize result tracking
+previousExecutionResults = []
+```
+
+### Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation
+
+**Dependency Analysis & Grouping Algorithm**:
+```javascript
+// Use explicit depends_on from plan.json (no inference from file/keywords)
+function extractDependencies(tasks) {
+  const taskIdToIndex = {}
+  tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
+
+  return tasks.map((task, i) => {
+    // Only use explicit depends_on from plan.json
+    const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
+      .map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
+      .filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
+    return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
+  })
+}
+
+// Group into batches: maximize parallel execution
+function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
+  const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
+  const processed = new Set()
+  const calls = []
+
+  // Phase 1: All independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+  const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
+  if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
+    independentTasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: "parallel",
+      groupId: "P1",
+      taskSummary: independentTasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '),
+      tasks: independentTasks
+    })
+  }
+
+  // Phase 2: Dependent tasks → sequential batches (respect dependencies)
+  let sequentialIndex = 1
+  let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+
+  while (remaining.length > 0) {
+    // Find tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied
+    const ready = remaining.filter(t =>
+      t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
+    )
+
+    if (ready.length === 0) {
+      console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining tasks')
+      ready.push(...remaining)
+    }
+
+    // Group ready tasks (can run in parallel within this phase)
+    ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: ready.length > 1 ? "parallel" : "sequential",
+      groupId: ready.length > 1 ? `P${calls.length + 1}` : `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
+      taskSummary: ready.map(t => t.title).join(ready.length > 1 ? ' | ' : ' → '),
+      tasks: ready
+    })
+
+    remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+  }
+
+  return calls
+}
+
+executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(planObject.tasks, executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
+    content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : "→"} ${c.id} (${c.tasks.length} tasks)`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Executing ${c.id}`
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+### Step 3: Launch Execution
+
+**Executor Resolution** (任务级 executor 优先于全局设置):
+```javascript
+// 获取任务的 executor（优先使用 executorAssignments，fallback 到全局 executionMethod）
+function getTaskExecutor(task) {
+  const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
+  if (assignments[task.id]) {
+    return assignments[task.id].executor  // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
+  }
+  // Fallback: 全局 executionMethod 映射
+  const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
+  if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
+  if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
+  // Auto: 根据复杂度
+  return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex'
+}
+
+// 按 executor 分组任务
+function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
+  const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    const executor = getTaskExecutor(task)
+    groups[executor].push(task)
+  })
+  return groups
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Flow**: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
+```javascript
+const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
+const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")
+
+// Phase 1: Launch all parallel batches (single message with multiple tool calls)
+if (parallel.length > 0) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending" })) })
+  parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
+  previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending" })) })
+}
+
+// Phase 2: Execute sequential batches one by one
+for (const call of sequential) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c === call ? "in_progress" : "..." })) })
+  result = await executeBatch(call)
+  previousExecutionResults.push(result)
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: "completed" or "pending" })) })
+}
+```
+
+**Option A: Agent Execution**
+
+When to use:
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "agent"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Agent"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"` (全局 fallback)
+
+**Task Formatting Principle**: Each task is a self-contained checklist. The agent only needs to know what THIS task requires, not its position or relation to other tasks.
+
+Agent call format:
+```javascript
+// Format single task as self-contained checklist
+function formatTaskChecklist(task) {
+  return `
+## ${task.title}
+
+**Target**: \`${task.file}\`
+**Action**: ${task.action}
+
+### What to do
+${task.description}
+
+### How to do it
+${task.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
+
+### Reference
+- Pattern: ${task.reference.pattern}
+- Examples: ${task.reference.files.join(', ')}
+- Notes: ${task.reference.examples}
+
+### Done when
+${task.acceptance.map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
+`
+}
+
+// For batch execution: aggregate tasks without numbering
+function formatBatchPrompt(batch) {
+  const tasksSection = batch.tasks.map(t => formatTaskChecklist(t)).join('\n---\n')
+
+  return `
+${originalUserInput ? `## Goal\n${originalUserInput}\n` : ''}
+
+## Tasks
+
+${tasksSection}
+
+${batch.context ? `## Context\n${batch.context}` : ''}
+
+Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.
+`
+}
+
+Task(
+  subagent_type="code-developer",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=batch.taskSummary,
+  prompt=formatBatchPrompt({
+    tasks: batch.tasks,
+    context: buildRelevantContext(batch.tasks)
+  })
+)
+
+// Helper: Build relevant context for batch
+// Context serves as REFERENCE ONLY - helps agent understand existing state
+function buildRelevantContext(tasks) {
+  const sections = []
+
+  // 1. Previous work completion - what's already done (reference for continuity)
+  if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
+    sections.push(`### Previous Work (Reference)
+Use this to understand what's already completed. Avoid duplicating work.
+
+${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `**${r.tasksSummary}**
+- Status: ${r.status}
+- Outputs: ${r.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
+${r.notes ? `- Notes: ${r.notes}` : ''}`
+    ).join('\n\n')}`)
+  }
+
+  // 2. Related files - files that may need to be read/referenced
+  const relatedFiles = extractRelatedFiles(tasks)
+  if (relatedFiles.length > 0) {
+    sections.push(`### Related Files (Reference)
+These files may contain patterns, types, or utilities relevant to your tasks:
+
+${relatedFiles.map(f => `- \`${f}\``).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+
+  // 3. Clarifications from user
+  if (clarificationContext) {
+    sections.push(`### User Clarifications
+${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- **${q}**: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+
+  // 4. Artifact files (for deeper context if needed)
+  if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
+    sections.push(`### Artifacts
+For detailed planning context, read: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
+  }
+
+  return sections.join('\n\n')
+}
+
+// Extract related files from task references
+function extractRelatedFiles(tasks) {
+  const files = new Set()
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    // Add reference example files
+    if (task.reference?.files) {
+      task.reference.files.forEach(f => files.add(f))
+    }
+  })
+  return [...files]
+}
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, collect result following `executionResult` structure (see Data Structures section)
+
+**Option B: CLI Execution (Codex)**
+
+When to use:
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "codex"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Codex"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium/High"` (全局 fallback)
+
+**Task Formatting Principle**: Same as Agent - each task is a self-contained checklist. No task numbering or position awareness.
+
+Command format:
+```bash
+// Format single task as compact checklist for CLI
+function formatTaskForCLI(task) {
+  return `
+## ${task.title}
+File: ${task.file}
+Action: ${task.action}
+
+What: ${task.description}
+
+How:
+${task.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
+
+Reference: ${task.reference.pattern} (see ${task.reference.files.join(', ')})
+Notes: ${task.reference.examples}
+
+Done when:
+${task.acceptance.map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
+`
+}
+
+// Build CLI prompt for batch
+// Context provides REFERENCE information - not requirements to fulfill
+function buildCLIPrompt(batch) {
+  const tasksSection = batch.tasks.map(t => formatTaskForCLI(t)).join('\n---\n')
+
+  let prompt = `${originalUserInput ? `## Goal\n${originalUserInput}\n\n` : ''}`
+  prompt += `## Tasks\n\n${tasksSection}\n`
+
+  // Context section - reference information only
+  const contextSections = []
+
+  // 1. Previous work - what's already completed
+  if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
+    contextSections.push(`### Previous Work (Reference)
+Already completed - avoid duplicating:
+${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}${r.keyOutputs ? ` (${r.keyOutputs})` : ''}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+
+  // 2. Related files from task references
+  const relatedFiles = [...new Set(batch.tasks.flatMap(t => t.reference?.files || []))]
+  if (relatedFiles.length > 0) {
+    contextSections.push(`### Related Files (Reference)
+Patterns and examples to follow:
+${relatedFiles.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+
+  // 3. User clarifications
+  if (clarificationContext) {
+    contextSections.push(`### Clarifications
+${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+
+  // 4. Plan artifact for deeper context
+  if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
+    contextSections.push(`### Artifacts
+Detailed plan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
+  }
+
+  if (contextSections.length > 0) {
+    prompt += `\n## Context\n${contextSections.join('\n\n')}\n`
+  }
+
+  prompt += `\nComplete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`
+
+  return prompt
+}
+
+ccw cli -p "${buildCLIPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write
+```
+
+**Execution with fixed IDs** (predictable ID pattern):
+```javascript
+// Launch CLI in foreground (NOT background)
+// Timeout based on complexity: Low=40min, Medium=60min, High=100min
+const timeoutByComplexity = {
+  "Low": 2400000,    // 40 minutes
+  "Medium": 3600000, // 60 minutes
+  "High": 6000000    // 100 minutes
+}
+
+// Generate fixed execution ID: ${sessionId}-${groupId}
+// This enables predictable ID lookup without relying on resume context chains
+const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
+const fixedExecutionId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`  // e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
+
+// Check if resuming from previous failed execution
+const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
+
+// Build command with fixed ID (and optional resume for continuation)
+const cli_command = previousCliId
+  ? `ccw cli -p "${buildCLIPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
+  : `ccw cli -p "${buildCLIPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}`
+
+bash_result = Bash(
+  command=cli_command,
+  timeout=timeoutByComplexity[planObject.complexity] || 3600000
+)
+
+// Execution ID is now predictable: ${fixedExecutionId}
+// Can also extract from output: "ID: implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
+const cliExecutionId = fixedExecutionId
+
+// Update TodoWrite when execution completes
+```
+
+**Resume on Failure** (with fixed ID):
+```javascript
+// If execution failed or timed out, offer resume option
+if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
+  console.log(`
+⚠️ Execution incomplete. Resume available:
+   Fixed ID: ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Lookup: ccw cli detail ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue tasks" --resume ${fixedExecutionId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}-retry
+`)
+
+  // Store for potential retry in same session
+  batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedExecutionId
+}
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, analyze output and collect result following `executionResult` structure (include `cliExecutionId` for resume capability)
+
+**Option C: CLI Execution (Gemini)**
+
+When to use: `getTaskExecutor(task) === "gemini"` (分析类任务)
+
+```bash
+# 使用与 Option B 相同的 formatBatchPrompt，切换 tool 和 mode
+ccw cli -p "${formatBatchPrompt(batch)}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}
+```
+
+### Step 4: Progress Tracking
+
+Progress tracked at batch level (not individual task level). Icons: ⚡ (parallel, concurrent), → (sequential, one-by-one)
+
+### Step 5: Code Review (Optional)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Only run if `codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip"`
+
+**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against plan acceptance criteria
+- Read plan.json for task acceptance criteria
+- Check each acceptance criterion is fulfilled
+- Validate code quality and identify issues
+- Ensure alignment with planned approach
+
+**Operations**:
+- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review
+- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt
+- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, codex, etc.)
+
+**Unified Review Template** (All tools use same standard):
+
+**Review Criteria**:
+- **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify each criterion from plan.tasks[].acceptance
+- **Code Quality**: Analyze quality, identify issues, suggest improvements
+- **Plan Alignment**: Validate implementation matches planned approach
+
+**Shared Prompt Template** (used by all CLI tools):
+```
+PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against plan acceptance criteria
+TASK: • Verify plan acceptance criteria fulfillment • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements
+EXPECTED: Quality assessment with acceptance criteria verification, issue identification, and recommendations. Explicitly check each acceptance criterion from plan.json tasks.
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on plan acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
+```
+
+**Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
+
+```bash
+# Method 1: Agent Review (current agent)
+# - Read plan.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
+# - Apply unified review criteria (see Shared Prompt Template)
+# - Report findings directly
+
+# Method 2: Gemini Review (recommended)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool gemini --mode analysis
+# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
+
+# Method 3: Qwen Review (alternative)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool qwen --mode analysis
+# Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
+
+# Method 4: Codex Review (autonomous)
+ccw cli -p "[Verify plan acceptance criteria at ${plan.json}]" --tool codex --mode write
+```
+
+**Multi-Round Review with Fixed IDs**:
+```javascript
+// Generate fixed review ID
+const reviewId = `${sessionId}-review`
+
+// First review pass with fixed ID
+const reviewResult = Bash(`ccw cli -p "[Review prompt]" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}`)
+
+// If issues found, continue review dialog with fixed ID chain
+if (hasUnresolvedIssues(reviewResult)) {
+  // Resume with follow-up questions
+  Bash(`ccw cli -p "Clarify the security concerns you mentioned" --resume ${reviewId} --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}-followup`)
+}
+```
+
+**Implementation Note**: Replace `[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]` placeholder with actual template content, substituting:
+- `@{plan.json}` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`
+- `[@{exploration.json}]` → exploration files from artifacts (if exists)
+
+### Step 6: Update Development Index
+
+**Trigger**: After all executions complete (regardless of code review)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skip if `.workflow/project.json` does not exist
+
+**Operations**:
+```javascript
+const projectJsonPath = '.workflow/project.json'
+if (!fileExists(projectJsonPath)) return  // Silent skip
+
+const projectJson = JSON.parse(Read(projectJsonPath))
+
+// Initialize if needed
+if (!projectJson.development_index) {
+  projectJson.development_index = { feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: [] }
+}
+
+// Detect category from keywords
+function detectCategory(text) {
+  text = text.toLowerCase()
+  if (/\b(fix|bug|error|issue|crash)\b/.test(text)) return 'bugfix'
+  if (/\b(refactor|cleanup|reorganize)\b/.test(text)) return 'refactor'
+  if (/\b(doc|readme|comment)\b/.test(text)) return 'docs'
+  if (/\b(add|new|create|implement)\b/.test(text)) return 'feature'
+  return 'enhancement'
+}
+
+// Detect sub_feature from task file paths
+function detectSubFeature(tasks) {
+  const dirs = tasks.map(t => t.file?.split('/').slice(-2, -1)[0]).filter(Boolean)
+  const counts = dirs.reduce((a, d) => { a[d] = (a[d] || 0) + 1; return a }, {})
+  return Object.entries(counts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])[0]?.[0] || 'general'
+}
+
+const category = detectCategory(`${planObject.summary} ${planObject.approach}`)
+const entry = {
+  title: planObject.summary.slice(0, 60),
+  sub_feature: detectSubFeature(planObject.tasks),
+  date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],
+  description: planObject.approach.slice(0, 100),
+  status: previousExecutionResults.every(r => r.status === 'completed') ? 'completed' : 'partial',
+  session_id: executionContext?.session?.id || null
+}
+
+projectJson.development_index[category].push(entry)
+projectJson.statistics.last_updated = new Date().toISOString()
+Write(projectJsonPath, JSON.stringify(projectJson, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`✓ Development index: [${category}] ${entry.title}`)
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+**Input Modes**: In-memory (lite-plan), prompt (standalone), file (JSON/text)
+**Task Grouping**: Based on explicit depends_on only; independent tasks run in single parallel batch
+**Execution**: All independent tasks launch concurrently via single Claude message with multiple tool calls
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing executionContext | --in-memory without context | Error: "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." |
+| File not found | File path doesn't exist | Error: "File not found: {path}. Check file path." |
+| Empty file | File exists but no content | Error: "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
+| Invalid Enhanced Task JSON | JSON missing required fields | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
+| Malformed JSON | JSON parsing fails | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
+| Execution failure | Agent/Codex crashes | Display error, use fixed ID `${sessionId}-${groupId}` for resume: `ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume <fixed-id> --id <fixed-id>-retry` |
+| Execution timeout | CLI exceeded timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
+| Codex unavailable | Codex not installed | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
+| Fixed ID not found | Custom ID lookup failed | Check `ccw cli history`, verify date directories |
+
+## Data Structures
+
+### executionContext (Input - Mode 1)
+
+Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
+
+```javascript
+{
+  planObject: {
+    summary: string,
+    approach: string,
+    tasks: [...],
+    estimated_time: string,
+    recommended_execution: string,
+    complexity: string
+  },
+  explorationsContext: {...} | null,       // Multi-angle explorations
+  explorationAngles: string[],             // List of exploration angles
+  explorationManifest: {...} | null,       // Exploration manifest
+  clarificationContext: {...} | null,
+  executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",  // 全局默认
+  codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Agent Review" | string,
+  originalUserInput: string,
+
+  // 任务级 executor 分配（优先于 executionMethod）
+  executorAssignments: {
+    [taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
+  },
+
+  // Session artifacts location (saved by lite-plan)
+  session: {
+    id: string,                        // Session identifier: {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
+    folder: string,                    // Session folder path: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
+    artifacts: {
+      explorations: [{angle, path}],   // exploration-{angle}.json paths
+      explorations_manifest: string,   // explorations-manifest.json path
+      plan: string                     // plan.json path (always present)
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Artifact Usage**:
+- Artifact files contain detailed planning context
+- Pass artifact paths to CLI tools and agents for enhanced context
+- See execution options below for usage examples
+
+### executionResult (Output)
+
+Collected after each execution call completes:
+
+```javascript
+{
+  executionId: string,                 // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
+  status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
+  tasksSummary: string,                // Brief description of tasks handled
+  completionSummary: string,           // What was completed
+  keyOutputs: string,                  // Files created/modified, key changes
+  notes: string,                       // Important context for next execution
+  fixedCliId: string | null            // Fixed CLI execution ID (e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1")
+}
+```
+
+Appended to `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity in multi-execution scenarios.
+
+**Fixed ID Pattern**: `${sessionId}-${groupId}` enables predictable lookup without auto-generated timestamps.
+
+**Resume Usage**: If `status` is "partial" or "failed", use `fixedCliId` to resume:
+```bash
+# Lookup previous execution
+ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
+
+# Resume with new fixed ID for retry
+ccw cli -p "Continue from where we left off" --resume ${fixedCliId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedCliId}-retry
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/lite-fix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
+---
+name: lite-fix
+description: Lightweight bug diagnosis and fix workflow with intelligent severity assessment and optional hotfix mode for production incidents
+argument-hint: "[--hotfix] \"bug description or issue reference\""
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), SlashCommand(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Lite-Fix Command (/workflow:lite-fix)
+
+## Overview
+
+Intelligent lightweight bug fixing command with dynamic workflow adaptation based on severity assessment. Focuses on diagnosis phases (root cause analysis, impact assessment, fix planning, confirmation) and delegates execution to `/workflow:lite-execute`.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Intelligent bug analysis with automatic severity detection
+- Dynamic code diagnosis (cli-explore-agent) for root cause identification
+- Interactive clarification after diagnosis to gather missing information
+- Adaptive fix planning strategy (direct Claude vs cli-lite-planning-agent) based on complexity
+- Two-step confirmation: fix-plan display -> multi-dimensional input collection
+- Execution dispatch with complete context handoff to lite-execute
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-fix [FLAGS] <BUG_DESCRIPTION>
+
+# Flags
+--hotfix, -h               Production hotfix mode (minimal diagnosis, fast fix)
+
+# Arguments
+<bug-description>          Bug description, error message, or path to .md file (required)
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Bug Analysis & Diagnosis
+   |- Parse input (description, error message, or .md file)
+   |- Intelligent severity pre-assessment (Low/Medium/High/Critical)
+   |- Diagnosis decision (auto-detect or --hotfix flag)
+   |- Context protection: If file reading >=50k chars -> force cli-explore-agent
+   +- Decision:
+      |- needsDiagnosis=true -> Launch parallel cli-explore-agents (1-4 based on severity)
+      +- needsDiagnosis=false (hotfix) -> Skip directly to Phase 3 (Fix Planning)
+
+Phase 2: Clarification (optional, multi-round)
+   |- Aggregate clarification_needs from all diagnosis angles
+   |- Deduplicate similar questions
+   +- Decision:
+      |- Has clarifications -> AskUserQuestion (max 4 questions per round, multiple rounds allowed)
+      +- No clarifications -> Skip to Phase 3
+
+Phase 3: Fix Planning (NO CODE EXECUTION - planning only)
+   +- Decision (based on Phase 1 severity):
+      |- Low/Medium -> Load schema: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/fix-plan-json-schema.json -> Direct Claude planning (following schema) -> fix-plan.json -> MUST proceed to Phase 4
+      +- High/Critical -> cli-lite-planning-agent -> fix-plan.json -> MUST proceed to Phase 4
+
+Phase 4: Confirmation & Selection
+   |- Display fix-plan summary (tasks, severity, estimated time)
+   +- AskUserQuestion:
+      |- Confirm: Allow / Modify / Cancel
+      |- Execution: Agent / Codex / Auto
+      +- Review: Gemini / Agent / Skip
+
+Phase 5: Dispatch
+   |- Build executionContext (fix-plan + diagnoses + clarifications + selections)
+   +- SlashCommand("/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory --mode bugfix")
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Intelligent Multi-Angle Diagnosis
+
+**Session Setup** (MANDATORY - follow exactly):
+```javascript
+// Helper: Get UTC+8 (China Standard Time) ISO string
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const bugSlug = bug_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 40)
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)  // Format: 2025-11-29
+
+const sessionId = `${bugSlug}-${dateStr}`  // e.g., "user-avatar-upload-fails-2025-11-29"
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.lite-fix/${sessionId}`
+
+bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder} && test -d ${sessionFolder} && echo "SUCCESS: ${sessionFolder}" || echo "FAILED: ${sessionFolder}"`)
+```
+
+**Diagnosis Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+const hotfixMode = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--hotfix') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-h')
+
+needsDiagnosis = (
+  !hotfixMode &&
+  (
+    bug.lacks_specific_error_message ||
+    bug.requires_codebase_context ||
+    bug.needs_execution_tracing ||
+    bug.root_cause_unclear
+  )
+)
+
+if (!needsDiagnosis) {
+  // Skip to Phase 2 (Clarification) or Phase 3 (Fix Planning)
+  proceed_to_next_phase()
+}
+```
+
+**Context Protection**: File reading >=50k chars -> force `needsDiagnosis=true` (delegate to cli-explore-agent)
+
+**Severity Pre-Assessment** (Intelligent Analysis):
+```javascript
+// Analyzes bug severity based on:
+// - Symptoms: Error messages, crash reports, user complaints
+// - Scope: How many users/features are affected?
+// - Urgency: Production down vs minor inconvenience
+// - Impact: Data loss, security, business impact
+
+const severity = analyzeBugSeverity(bug_description)
+// Returns: 'Low' | 'Medium' | 'High' | 'Critical'
+// Low: Minor UI issue, localized, no data impact
+// Medium: Multiple users affected, degraded functionality
+// High: Significant functionality broken, many users affected
+// Critical: Production down, data loss risk, security issue
+
+// Angle assignment based on bug type (orchestrator decides, not agent)
+const DIAGNOSIS_ANGLE_PRESETS = {
+  runtime_error: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
+  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
+  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
+  data_corruption: ['data-integrity', 'state-management', 'transactions', 'validation'],
+  ui_bug: ['state-management', 'event-handling', 'rendering', 'data-binding'],
+  integration: ['api-contracts', 'error-handling', 'timeouts', 'fallbacks']
+}
+
+function selectDiagnosisAngles(bugDescription, count) {
+  const text = bugDescription.toLowerCase()
+  let preset = 'runtime_error' // default
+
+  if (/slow|timeout|performance|lag|hang/.test(text)) preset = 'performance'
+  else if (/security|auth|permission|access|token/.test(text)) preset = 'security'
+  else if (/corrupt|data|lost|missing|inconsistent/.test(text)) preset = 'data_corruption'
+  else if (/ui|display|render|style|click|button/.test(text)) preset = 'ui_bug'
+  else if (/api|integration|connect|request|response/.test(text)) preset = 'integration'
+
+  return DIAGNOSIS_ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count)
+}
+
+const selectedAngles = selectDiagnosisAngles(bug_description, severity === 'Critical' ? 4 : (severity === 'High' ? 3 : (severity === 'Medium' ? 2 : 1)))
+
+console.log(`
+## Diagnosis Plan
+
+Bug Severity: ${severity}
+Selected Angles: ${selectedAngles.join(', ')}
+
+Launching ${selectedAngles.length} parallel diagnoses...
+`)
+```
+
+**Launch Parallel Diagnoses** - Orchestrator assigns angle to each agent:
+
+```javascript
+// Launch agents with pre-assigned diagnosis angles
+const diagnosisTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,
+    description=`Diagnose: ${angle}`,
+    prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Execute **${angle}** diagnosis for bug root cause analysis. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover root cause, affected paths, and fix hints.
+
+## Assigned Context
+- **Diagnosis Angle**: ${angle}
+- **Bug Description**: ${bug_description}
+- **Diagnosis Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
+- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json
+
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
+2. Run: rg -l "{error_keyword_from_bug}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
+3. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/diagnosis-json-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+## Diagnosis Strategy (${angle} focus)
+
+**Step 1: Error Tracing** (Bash)
+- rg for error messages, stack traces, log patterns
+- git log --since='2 weeks ago' for recent changes
+- Trace execution path in affected modules
+
+**Step 2: Root Cause Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
+- What code paths lead to this ${angle} issue?
+- What edge cases are not handled from ${angle} perspective?
+- What recent changes might have introduced this bug?
+
+**Step 3: Write Output**
+- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
+- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
+- Provide fix hints based on ${angle} analysis
+
+## Expected Output
+
+**File**: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json
+
+**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
+
+**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
+- symptom: Bug symptoms and error messages
+- root_cause: Root cause hypothesis from ${angle} perspective
+  **IMPORTANT**: Use structured format:
+  \`{file: "src/module/file.ts", line_range: "45-60", issue: "Description", confidence: 0.85}\`
+- affected_files: Files involved from ${angle} perspective
+  **IMPORTANT**: Use object format with relevance scores:
+  \`[{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Contains ${angle} logic"}]\`
+- reproduction_steps: Steps to reproduce the bug
+- fix_hints: Suggested fix approaches from ${angle} viewpoint
+- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle} diagnosis
+- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations affecting fix
+- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
+- _metadata.diagnosis_angle: "${angle}"
+- _metadata.diagnosis_index: ${index + 1}
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Schema obtained via cat diagnosis-json-schema.json
+- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
+- [ ] Root cause identified with confidence score
+- [ ] At least 3 affected files identified with ${angle} rationale
+- [ ] Fix hints are actionable (specific code changes, not generic advice)
+- [ ] Reproduction steps are verifiable
+- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
+
+## Output
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json
+Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} diagnosis findings
+`
+  )
+)
+
+// Execute all diagnosis tasks in parallel
+```
+
+**Auto-discover Generated Diagnosis Files**:
+```javascript
+// After diagnoses complete, auto-discover all diagnosis-*.json files
+const diagnosisFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "diagnosis-*.json" -type f`)
+  .split('\n')
+  .filter(f => f.trim())
+
+// Read metadata to build manifest
+const diagnosisManifest = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  bug_description: bug_description,
+  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
+  severity: severity,
+  diagnosis_count: diagnosisFiles.length,
+  diagnoses: diagnosisFiles.map(file => {
+    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file))
+    const filename = path.basename(file)
+    return {
+      angle: data._metadata.diagnosis_angle,
+      file: filename,
+      path: file,
+      index: data._metadata.diagnosis_index
+    }
+  })
+}
+
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/diagnoses-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(diagnosisManifest, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`
+## Diagnosis Complete
+
+Generated diagnosis files in ${sessionFolder}:
+${diagnosisManifest.diagnoses.map(d => `- diagnosis-${d.angle}.json (angle: ${d.angle})`).join('\n')}
+
+Manifest: diagnoses-manifest.json
+Angles diagnosed: ${diagnosisManifest.diagnoses.map(d => d.angle).join(', ')}
+`)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-{angle1}.json`
+- `${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-{angle2}.json`
+- ... (1-4 files based on severity)
+- `${sessionFolder}/diagnoses-manifest.json`
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Clarification (Optional, Multi-Round)
+
+**Skip if**: No diagnosis or `clarification_needs` is empty across all diagnoses
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: AskUserQuestion tool limits max 4 questions per call. **MUST execute multiple rounds** to exhaust all clarification needs - do NOT stop at round 1.
+
+**Aggregate clarification needs from all diagnosis angles**:
+```javascript
+// Load manifest and all diagnosis files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/diagnoses-manifest.json`))
+const diagnoses = manifest.diagnoses.map(diag => ({
+  angle: diag.angle,
+  data: JSON.parse(Read(diag.path))
+}))
+
+// Aggregate clarification needs from all diagnoses
+const allClarifications = []
+diagnoses.forEach(diag => {
+  if (diag.data.clarification_needs?.length > 0) {
+    diag.data.clarification_needs.forEach(need => {
+      allClarifications.push({
+        ...need,
+        source_angle: diag.angle
+      })
+    })
+  }
+})
+
+// Deduplicate by question similarity
+function deduplicateClarifications(clarifications) {
+  const unique = []
+  clarifications.forEach(c => {
+    const isDuplicate = unique.some(u =>
+      u.question.toLowerCase() === c.question.toLowerCase()
+    )
+    if (!isDuplicate) unique.push(c)
+  })
+  return unique
+}
+
+const uniqueClarifications = deduplicateClarifications(allClarifications)
+
+// Multi-round clarification: batch questions (max 4 per round)
+// ⚠️ MUST execute ALL rounds until uniqueClarifications exhausted
+if (uniqueClarifications.length > 0) {
+  const BATCH_SIZE = 4
+  const totalRounds = Math.ceil(uniqueClarifications.length / BATCH_SIZE)
+
+  for (let i = 0; i < uniqueClarifications.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+    const batch = uniqueClarifications.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE)
+    const currentRound = Math.floor(i / BATCH_SIZE) + 1
+
+    console.log(`### Clarification Round ${currentRound}/${totalRounds}`)
+
+    AskUserQuestion({
+      questions: batch.map(need => ({
+        question: `[${need.source_angle}] ${need.question}\n\nContext: ${need.context}`,
+        header: need.source_angle,
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: need.options.map((opt, index) => {
+          const isRecommended = need.recommended === index
+          return {
+            label: isRecommended ? `${opt} ★` : opt,
+            description: isRecommended ? `Use ${opt} approach (Recommended)` : `Use ${opt} approach`
+          }
+        })
+      }))
+    })
+
+    // Store batch responses in clarificationContext before next round
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Output**: `clarificationContext` (in-memory)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Fix Planning
+
+**Planning Strategy Selection** (based on Phase 1 severity):
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Phase 3 is **planning only** - NO code execution. All execution happens in Phase 5 via lite-execute.
+
+**Low/Medium Severity** - Direct planning by Claude:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Read schema
+const schema = Bash(`cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/fix-plan-json-schema.json`)
+
+// Step 2: Generate fix-plan following schema (Claude directly, no agent)
+const fixPlan = {
+  summary: "...",
+  root_cause: "...",
+  strategy: "immediate_patch|comprehensive_fix|refactor",
+  tasks: [...],  // Each task: { id, title, scope, ..., depends_on, complexity }
+  estimated_time: "...",
+  recommended_execution: "Agent",
+  severity: severity,
+  risk_level: "...",
+  _metadata: { timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(), source: "direct-planning", planning_mode: "direct" }
+}
+
+// Step 3: Write fix-plan to session folder
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json`, JSON.stringify(fixPlan, null, 2))
+
+// Step 4: MUST continue to Phase 4 (Confirmation) - DO NOT execute code here
+```
+
+**High/Critical Severity** - Invoke cli-lite-planning-agent:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-lite-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Generate detailed fix plan",
+  prompt=`
+Generate fix plan and write fix-plan.json.
+
+## Output Schema Reference
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/fix-plan-json-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan)
+
+## Bug Description
+${bug_description}
+
+## Multi-Angle Diagnosis Context
+
+${manifest.diagnoses.map(diag => `### Diagnosis: ${diag.angle} (${diag.file})
+Path: ${diag.path}
+
+Read this file for detailed ${diag.angle} analysis.`).join('\n\n')}
+
+Total diagnoses: ${manifest.diagnosis_count}
+Angles covered: ${manifest.diagnoses.map(d => d.angle).join(', ')}
+
+Manifest: ${sessionFolder}/diagnoses-manifest.json
+
+## User Clarifications
+${JSON.stringify(clarificationContext) || "None"}
+
+## Severity Level
+${severity}
+
+## Requirements
+Generate fix-plan.json with:
+- summary: 2-3 sentence overview of the fix
+- root_cause: Consolidated root cause from all diagnoses
+- strategy: "immediate_patch" | "comprehensive_fix" | "refactor"
+- tasks: 1-5 structured fix tasks (**IMPORTANT: group by fix area, NOT by file**)
+  - **Task Granularity Principle**: Each task = one complete fix unit
+  - title: action verb + target (e.g., "Fix token validation edge case")
+  - scope: module path (src/auth/) or feature name
+  - action: "Fix" | "Update" | "Refactor" | "Add" | "Delete"
+  - description
+  - modification_points: ALL files to modify for this fix (group related changes)
+  - implementation (2-5 steps covering all modification_points)
+  - verification (test criteria)
+  - depends_on: task IDs this task depends on (use sparingly)
+- estimated_time, recommended_execution, severity, risk_level
+- _metadata:
+  - timestamp, source, planning_mode
+  - diagnosis_angles: ${JSON.stringify(manifest.diagnoses.map(d => d.angle))}
+
+## Task Grouping Rules
+1. **Group by fix area**: All changes for one fix = one task (even if 2-3 files)
+2. **Avoid file-per-task**: Do NOT create separate tasks for each file
+3. **Substantial tasks**: Each task should represent 10-45 minutes of work
+4. **True dependencies only**: Only use depends_on when Task B cannot start without Task A's output
+5. **Prefer parallel**: Most tasks should be independent (no depends_on)
+
+## Execution
+1. Read ALL diagnosis files for comprehensive context
+2. Execute CLI planning using Gemini (Qwen fallback)
+3. Synthesize findings from multiple diagnosis angles
+4. Parse output and structure fix-plan
+5. Write JSON: Write('${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json', jsonContent)
+6. Return brief completion summary
+`
+)
+```
+
+**Output**: `${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json`
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Task Confirmation & Execution Selection
+
+**Step 4.1: Display Fix Plan**
+```javascript
+const fixPlan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json`))
+
+console.log(`
+## Fix Plan
+
+**Summary**: ${fixPlan.summary}
+**Root Cause**: ${fixPlan.root_cause}
+**Strategy**: ${fixPlan.strategy}
+
+**Tasks** (${fixPlan.tasks.length}):
+${fixPlan.tasks.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t.title} (${t.scope})`).join('\n')}
+
+**Severity**: ${fixPlan.severity}
+**Risk Level**: ${fixPlan.risk_level}
+**Estimated Time**: ${fixPlan.estimated_time}
+**Recommended**: ${fixPlan.recommended_execution}
+`)
+```
+
+**Step 4.2: Collect Confirmation**
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: `Confirm fix plan? (${fixPlan.tasks.length} tasks, ${fixPlan.severity} severity)`,
+      header: "Confirm",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Allow", description: "Proceed as-is" },
+        { label: "Modify", description: "Adjust before execution" },
+        { label: "Cancel", description: "Abort workflow" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Execution method:",
+      header: "Execution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+        { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Auto", description: `Auto: ${fixPlan.severity === 'Low' ? 'Agent' : 'Codex'}` }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Code review after fix?",
+      header: "Review",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI" },
+        { label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer" },
+        { label: "Skip", description: "No review" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Dispatch to Execution
+
+**CRITICAL**: lite-fix NEVER executes code directly. ALL execution MUST go through lite-execute.
+
+**Step 5.1: Build executionContext**
+
+```javascript
+// Load manifest and all diagnosis files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/diagnoses-manifest.json`))
+const diagnoses = {}
+
+manifest.diagnoses.forEach(diag => {
+  if (file_exists(diag.path)) {
+    diagnoses[diag.angle] = JSON.parse(Read(diag.path))
+  }
+})
+
+const fixPlan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json`))
+
+executionContext = {
+  mode: "bugfix",
+  severity: fixPlan.severity,
+  planObject: fixPlan,
+  diagnosisContext: diagnoses,
+  diagnosisAngles: manifest.diagnoses.map(d => d.angle),
+  diagnosisManifest: manifest,
+  clarificationContext: clarificationContext || null,
+  executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method,
+  codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool,
+  originalUserInput: bug_description,
+  session: {
+    id: sessionId,
+    folder: sessionFolder,
+    artifacts: {
+      diagnoses: manifest.diagnoses.map(diag => ({
+        angle: diag.angle,
+        path: diag.path
+      })),
+      diagnoses_manifest: `${sessionFolder}/diagnoses-manifest.json`,
+      fix_plan: `${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json`
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Step 5.2: Dispatch**
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory --mode bugfix")
+```
+
+## Session Folder Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.lite-fix/{bug-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/
+|- diagnosis-{angle1}.json      # Diagnosis angle 1
+|- diagnosis-{angle2}.json      # Diagnosis angle 2
+|- diagnosis-{angle3}.json      # Diagnosis angle 3 (if applicable)
+|- diagnosis-{angle4}.json      # Diagnosis angle 4 (if applicable)
+|- diagnoses-manifest.json      # Diagnosis index
++- fix-plan.json                # Fix plan
+```
+
+**Example**:
+```
+.workflow/.lite-fix/user-avatar-upload-fails-413-2025-11-25-14-30-25/
+|- diagnosis-error-handling.json
+|- diagnosis-dataflow.json
+|- diagnosis-validation.json
+|- diagnoses-manifest.json
++- fix-plan.json
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Diagnosis agent failure | Skip diagnosis, continue with bug description only |
+| Planning agent failure | Fallback to direct planning by Claude |
+| Clarification timeout | Use diagnosis findings as-is |
+| Confirmation timeout | Save context, display resume instructions |
+| Modify loop > 3 times | Suggest breaking task or using /workflow:plan |
+| Root cause unclear | Extend diagnosis time or use broader angles |
+| Too complex for lite-fix | Escalate to /workflow:plan --mode bugfix |
+
+

.claude/commands/workflow/lite-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,613 @@
+---
+name: lite-plan
+description: Lightweight interactive planning workflow with in-memory planning, code exploration, and execution dispatch to lite-execute after user confirmation
+argument-hint: "[-e|--explore] \"task description\"|file.md"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), SlashCommand(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Lite-Plan Command (/workflow:lite-plan)
+
+## Overview
+
+Intelligent lightweight planning command with dynamic workflow adaptation based on task complexity. Focuses on planning phases (exploration, clarification, planning, confirmation) and delegates execution to `/workflow:lite-execute`.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Intelligent task analysis with automatic exploration detection
+- Dynamic code exploration (cli-explore-agent) when codebase understanding needed
+- Interactive clarification after exploration to gather missing information
+- Adaptive planning: Low complexity → Direct Claude; Medium/High → cli-lite-planning-agent
+- Two-step confirmation: plan display → multi-dimensional input collection
+- Execution dispatch with complete context handoff to lite-execute
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-plan [FLAGS] <TASK_DESCRIPTION>
+
+# Flags
+-e, --explore              Force code exploration phase (overrides auto-detection)
+
+# Arguments
+<task-description>         Task description or path to .md file (required)
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Task Analysis & Exploration
+   ├─ Parse input (description or .md file)
+   ├─ intelligent complexity assessment (Low/Medium/High)
+   ├─ Exploration decision (auto-detect or --explore flag)
+   ├─ Context protection: If file reading ≥50k chars → force cli-explore-agent
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ needsExploration=true → Launch parallel cli-explore-agents (1-4 based on complexity)
+      └─ needsExploration=false → Skip to Phase 2/3
+
+Phase 2: Clarification (optional, multi-round)
+   ├─ Aggregate clarification_needs from all exploration angles
+   ├─ Deduplicate similar questions
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Has clarifications → AskUserQuestion (max 4 questions per round, multiple rounds allowed)
+      └─ No clarifications → Skip to Phase 3
+
+Phase 3: Planning (NO CODE EXECUTION - planning only)
+   └─ Decision (based on Phase 1 complexity):
+      ├─ Low → Load schema: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json → Direct Claude planning (following schema) → plan.json → MUST proceed to Phase 4
+      └─ Medium/High → cli-lite-planning-agent → plan.json → MUST proceed to Phase 4
+
+Phase 4: Confirmation & Selection
+   ├─ Display plan summary (tasks, complexity, estimated time)
+   └─ AskUserQuestion:
+      ├─ Confirm: Allow / Modify / Cancel
+      ├─ Execution: Agent / Codex / Auto
+      └─ Review: Gemini / Agent / Skip
+
+Phase 5: Dispatch
+   ├─ Build executionContext (plan + explorations + clarifications + selections)
+   └─ SlashCommand("/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory")
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Intelligent Multi-Angle Exploration
+
+**Session Setup** (MANDATORY - follow exactly):
+```javascript
+// Helper: Get UTC+8 (China Standard Time) ISO string
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const taskSlug = task_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 40)
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)  // Format: 2025-11-29
+
+const sessionId = `${taskSlug}-${dateStr}`  // e.g., "implement-jwt-refresh-2025-11-29"
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.lite-plan/${sessionId}`
+
+bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder} && test -d ${sessionFolder} && echo "SUCCESS: ${sessionFolder}" || echo "FAILED: ${sessionFolder}"`)
+```
+
+**Exploration Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+needsExploration = (
+  flags.includes('--explore') || flags.includes('-e') ||
+  task.mentions_specific_files ||
+  task.requires_codebase_context ||
+  task.needs_architecture_understanding ||
+  task.modifies_existing_code
+)
+
+if (!needsExploration) {
+  // Skip to Phase 2 (Clarification) or Phase 3 (Planning)
+  proceed_to_next_phase()
+}
+```
+
+**⚠️ Context Protection**: File reading ≥50k chars → force `needsExploration=true` (delegate to cli-explore-agent)
+
+**Complexity Assessment** (Intelligent Analysis):
+```javascript
+// analyzes task complexity based on:
+// - Scope: How many systems/modules are affected?
+// - Depth: Surface change vs architectural impact?
+// - Risk: Potential for breaking existing functionality?
+// - Dependencies: How interconnected is the change?
+
+const complexity = analyzeTaskComplexity(task_description)
+// Returns: 'Low' | 'Medium' | 'High'
+// Low: Single file, isolated change, minimal risk
+// Medium: Multiple files, some dependencies, moderate risk
+// High: Cross-module, architectural, high risk
+
+// Angle assignment based on task type (orchestrator decides, not agent)
+const ANGLE_PRESETS = {
+  architecture: ['architecture', 'dependencies', 'modularity', 'integration-points'],
+  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
+  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
+  bugfix: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
+  feature: ['patterns', 'integration-points', 'testing', 'dependencies']
+}
+
+function selectAngles(taskDescription, count) {
+  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase()
+  let preset = 'feature' // default
+
+  if (/refactor|architect|restructure|modular/.test(text)) preset = 'architecture'
+  else if (/security|auth|permission|access/.test(text)) preset = 'security'
+  else if (/performance|slow|optimi|cache/.test(text)) preset = 'performance'
+  else if (/fix|bug|error|issue|broken/.test(text)) preset = 'bugfix'
+
+  return ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count)
+}
+
+const selectedAngles = selectAngles(task_description, complexity === 'High' ? 4 : (complexity === 'Medium' ? 3 : 1))
+
+// Planning strategy determination
+const planningStrategy = complexity === 'Low'
+  ? 'Direct Claude Planning'
+  : 'cli-lite-planning-agent'
+
+console.log(`
+## Exploration Plan
+
+Task Complexity: ${complexity}
+Selected Angles: ${selectedAngles.join(', ')}
+Planning Strategy: ${planningStrategy}
+
+Launching ${selectedAngles.length} parallel explorations...
+`)
+```
+
+**Launch Parallel Explorations** - Orchestrator assigns angle to each agent:
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - NO BACKGROUND EXECUTION**:
+- **MUST NOT use `run_in_background: true`** - exploration results are REQUIRED before planning
+
+
+```javascript
+// Launch agents with pre-assigned angles
+const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,  // ⚠️ MANDATORY: Must wait for results
+    description=`Explore: ${angle}`,
+    prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
+
+## Assigned Context
+- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
+- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
+2. Run: rg -l "{keyword_from_task}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
+3. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/explore-json-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+## Exploration Strategy (${angle} focus)
+
+**Step 1: Structural Scan** (Bash)
+- get_modules_by_depth.sh → identify modules related to ${angle}
+- find/rg → locate files relevant to ${angle} aspect
+- Analyze imports/dependencies from ${angle} perspective
+
+**Step 2: Semantic Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
+- How does existing code handle ${angle} concerns?
+- What patterns are used for ${angle}?
+- Where would new code integrate from ${angle} viewpoint?
+
+**Step 3: Write Output**
+- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
+- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
+
+## Expected Output
+
+**File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
+
+**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
+- project_structure: Modules/architecture relevant to ${angle}
+- relevant_files: Files affected from ${angle} perspective
+  **IMPORTANT**: Use object format with relevance scores for synthesis:
+  \`[{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Core ${angle} logic"}]\`
+  Scores: 0.7+ high priority, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low
+- patterns: ${angle}-related patterns to follow
+- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle}
+- integration_points: Where to integrate from ${angle} viewpoint (include file:line locations)
+- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations/conventions
+- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
+- _metadata.exploration_angle: "${angle}"
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Schema obtained via cat explore-json-schema.json
+- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
+- [ ] At least 3 relevant files identified with ${angle} rationale
+- [ ] Patterns are actionable (code examples, not generic advice)
+- [ ] Integration points include file:line locations
+- [ ] Constraints are project-specific to ${angle}
+- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
+
+## Output
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
+`
+  )
+)
+
+// Execute all exploration tasks in parallel
+```
+
+**Auto-discover Generated Exploration Files**:
+```javascript
+// After explorations complete, auto-discover all exploration-*.json files
+const explorationFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "exploration-*.json" -type f`)
+  .split('\n')
+  .filter(f => f.trim())
+
+// Read metadata to build manifest
+const explorationManifest = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  task_description: task_description,
+  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
+  complexity: complexity,
+  exploration_count: explorationCount,
+  explorations: explorationFiles.map(file => {
+    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file))
+    const filename = path.basename(file)
+    return {
+      angle: data._metadata.exploration_angle,
+      file: filename,
+      path: file,
+      index: data._metadata.exploration_index
+    }
+  })
+}
+
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationManifest, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`
+## Exploration Complete
+
+Generated exploration files in ${sessionFolder}:
+${explorationManifest.explorations.map(e => `- exploration-${e.angle}.json (angle: ${e.angle})`).join('\n')}
+
+Manifest: explorations-manifest.json
+Angles explored: ${explorationManifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle).join(', ')}
+`)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `${sessionFolder}/exploration-{angle1}.json`
+- `${sessionFolder}/exploration-{angle2}.json`
+- ... (1-4 files based on complexity)
+- `${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Clarification (Optional, Multi-Round)
+
+**Skip if**: No exploration or `clarification_needs` is empty across all explorations
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: AskUserQuestion tool limits max 4 questions per call. **MUST execute multiple rounds** to exhaust all clarification needs - do NOT stop at round 1.
+
+**Aggregate clarification needs from all exploration angles**:
+```javascript
+// Load manifest and all exploration files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`))
+const explorations = manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
+  angle: exp.angle,
+  data: JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
+}))
+
+// Aggregate clarification needs from all explorations
+const allClarifications = []
+explorations.forEach(exp => {
+  if (exp.data.clarification_needs?.length > 0) {
+    exp.data.clarification_needs.forEach(need => {
+      allClarifications.push({
+        ...need,
+        source_angle: exp.angle
+      })
+    })
+  }
+})
+
+// Intelligent deduplication: analyze allClarifications by intent
+// - Identify questions with similar intent across different angles
+// - Merge similar questions: combine options, consolidate context
+// - Produce dedupedClarifications with unique intents only
+const dedupedClarifications = intelligentMerge(allClarifications)
+
+// Multi-round clarification: batch questions (max 4 per round)
+if (dedupedClarifications.length > 0) {
+  const BATCH_SIZE = 4
+  const totalRounds = Math.ceil(dedupedClarifications.length / BATCH_SIZE)
+
+  for (let i = 0; i < dedupedClarifications.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+    const batch = dedupedClarifications.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE)
+    const currentRound = Math.floor(i / BATCH_SIZE) + 1
+
+    console.log(`### Clarification Round ${currentRound}/${totalRounds}`)
+
+    AskUserQuestion({
+      questions: batch.map(need => ({
+        question: `[${need.source_angle}] ${need.question}\n\nContext: ${need.context}`,
+        header: need.source_angle.substring(0, 12),
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: need.options.map((opt, index) => ({
+          label: need.recommended === index ? `${opt} ★` : opt,
+          description: need.recommended === index ? `Recommended` : `Use ${opt}`
+        }))
+      }))
+    })
+
+    // Store batch responses in clarificationContext before next round
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Output**: `clarificationContext` (in-memory)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Planning
+
+**Planning Strategy Selection** (based on Phase 1 complexity):
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Phase 3 is **planning only** - NO code execution. All execution happens in Phase 5 via lite-execute.
+
+**Executor Assignment** (Claude 智能分配，plan 生成后执行):
+
+```javascript
+// 分配规则（优先级从高到低）：
+// 1. 用户明确指定："用 gemini 分析..." → gemini, "codex 实现..." → codex
+// 2. 默认 → agent
+
+const executorAssignments = {}  // { taskId: { executor: 'gemini'|'codex'|'agent', reason: string } }
+plan.tasks.forEach(task => {
+  // Claude 根据上述规则语义分析，为每个 task 分配 executor
+  executorAssignments[task.id] = { executor: '...', reason: '...' }
+})
+```
+
+**Low Complexity** - Direct planning by Claude:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Read schema
+const schema = Bash(`cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json`)
+
+// Step 2: ⚠️ MANDATORY - Read and review ALL exploration files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`))
+manifest.explorations.forEach(exp => {
+  const explorationData = Read(exp.path)
+  console.log(`\n### Exploration: ${exp.angle}\n${explorationData}`)
+})
+
+// Step 3: Generate plan following schema (Claude directly, no agent)
+// ⚠️ Plan MUST incorporate insights from exploration files read in Step 2
+const plan = {
+  summary: "...",
+  approach: "...",
+  tasks: [...],  // Each task: { id, title, scope, ..., depends_on, execution_group, complexity }
+  estimated_time: "...",
+  recommended_execution: "Agent",
+  complexity: "Low",
+  _metadata: { timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(), source: "direct-planning", planning_mode: "direct" }
+}
+
+// Step 4: Write plan to session folder
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`, JSON.stringify(plan, null, 2))
+
+// Step 5: MUST continue to Phase 4 (Confirmation) - DO NOT execute code here
+```
+
+**Medium/High Complexity** - Invoke cli-lite-planning-agent:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-lite-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Generate detailed implementation plan",
+  prompt=`
+Generate implementation plan and write plan.json.
+
+## Output Schema Reference
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan)
+
+## Task Description
+${task_description}
+
+## Multi-Angle Exploration Context
+
+${manifest.explorations.map(exp => `### Exploration: ${exp.angle} (${exp.file})
+Path: ${exp.path}
+
+Read this file for detailed ${exp.angle} analysis.`).join('\n\n')}
+
+Total explorations: ${manifest.exploration_count}
+Angles covered: ${manifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle).join(', ')}
+
+Manifest: ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json
+
+## User Clarifications
+${JSON.stringify(clarificationContext) || "None"}
+
+## Complexity Level
+${complexity}
+
+## Requirements
+Generate plan.json following the schema obtained above. Key constraints:
+- tasks: 2-7 structured tasks (**group by feature/module, NOT by file**)
+- _metadata.exploration_angles: ${JSON.stringify(manifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle))}
+
+## Task Grouping Rules
+1. **Group by feature**: All changes for one feature = one task (even if 3-5 files)
+2. **Group by context**: Tasks with similar context or related functional changes can be grouped together
+3. **Minimize agent count**: Simple, unrelated tasks can also be grouped to reduce agent execution overhead
+4. **Avoid file-per-task**: Do NOT create separate tasks for each file
+5. **Substantial tasks**: Each task should represent 15-60 minutes of work
+6. **True dependencies only**: Only use depends_on when Task B cannot start without Task A's output
+7. **Prefer parallel**: Most tasks should be independent (no depends_on)
+
+## Execution
+1. Read schema file (cat command above)
+2. Execute CLI planning using Gemini (Qwen fallback)
+3. Read ALL exploration files for comprehensive context
+4. Synthesize findings and generate plan following schema
+5. Write JSON: Write('${sessionFolder}/plan.json', jsonContent)
+6. Return brief completion summary
+`
+)
+```
+
+**Output**: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Task Confirmation & Execution Selection
+
+**Step 4.1: Display Plan**
+```javascript
+const plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`))
+
+console.log(`
+## Implementation Plan
+
+**Summary**: ${plan.summary}
+**Approach**: ${plan.approach}
+
+**Tasks** (${plan.tasks.length}):
+${plan.tasks.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t.title} (${t.file})`).join('\n')}
+
+**Complexity**: ${plan.complexity}
+**Estimated Time**: ${plan.estimated_time}
+**Recommended**: ${plan.recommended_execution}
+`)
+```
+
+**Step 4.2: Collect Confirmation**
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: `Confirm plan? (${plan.tasks.length} tasks, ${plan.complexity})`,
+      header: "Confirm",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Allow", description: "Proceed as-is" },
+        { label: "Modify", description: "Adjust before execution" },
+        { label: "Cancel", description: "Abort workflow" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Execution method:",
+      header: "Execution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+        { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Auto", description: `Auto: ${plan.complexity === 'Low' ? 'Agent' : 'Codex'}` }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Code review after execution?",
+      header: "Review",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI" },
+        { label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer" },
+        { label: "Skip", description: "No review" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Dispatch to Execution
+
+**CRITICAL**: lite-plan NEVER executes code directly. ALL execution MUST go through lite-execute.
+
+**Step 5.1: Build executionContext**
+
+```javascript
+// Load manifest and all exploration files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`))
+const explorations = {}
+
+manifest.explorations.forEach(exp => {
+  if (file_exists(exp.path)) {
+    explorations[exp.angle] = JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
+  }
+})
+
+const plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`))
+
+executionContext = {
+  planObject: plan,
+  explorationsContext: explorations,
+  explorationAngles: manifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle),
+  explorationManifest: manifest,
+  clarificationContext: clarificationContext || null,
+  executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method,  // 全局默认，可被 executorAssignments 覆盖
+  codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool,
+  originalUserInput: task_description,
+
+  // 任务级 executor 分配（优先于全局 executionMethod）
+  executorAssignments: executorAssignments,  // { taskId: { executor, reason } }
+
+  session: {
+    id: sessionId,
+    folder: sessionFolder,
+    artifacts: {
+      explorations: manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
+        angle: exp.angle,
+        path: exp.path
+      })),
+      explorations_manifest: `${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`,
+      plan: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Step 5.2: Dispatch**
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory")
+```
+
+## Session Folder Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.lite-plan/{task-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/
+├── exploration-{angle1}.json      # Exploration angle 1
+├── exploration-{angle2}.json      # Exploration angle 2
+├── exploration-{angle3}.json      # Exploration angle 3 (if applicable)
+├── exploration-{angle4}.json      # Exploration angle 4 (if applicable)
+├── explorations-manifest.json     # Exploration index
+└── plan.json                      # Implementation plan
+```
+
+**Example**:
+```
+.workflow/.lite-plan/implement-jwt-refresh-2025-11-25-14-30-25/
+├── exploration-architecture.json
+├── exploration-auth-patterns.json
+├── exploration-security.json
+├── explorations-manifest.json
+└── plan.json
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Exploration agent failure | Skip exploration, continue with task description only |
+| Planning agent failure | Fallback to direct planning by Claude |
+| Clarification timeout | Use exploration findings as-is |
+| Confirmation timeout | Save context, display resume instructions |
+| Modify loop > 3 times | Suggest breaking task or using /workflow:plan |

.claude/commands/workflow/plan.md

@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: plan
-description: Orchestrate 4-phase planning workflow by executing commands and passing context between phases
-usage: /workflow:plan [--agent] <input>
-argument-hint: "[--agent] \"text description\"|file.md|ISS-001"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
-  - /workflow:plan --agent "Build authentication system"
-  - /workflow:plan requirements.md
-  - /workflow:plan ISS-001
+description: 5-phase planning workflow with action-planning-agent task generation, outputs IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs
+argument-hint: "\"text description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -15,40 +9,82 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 4 slash commands in sequence, parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution through **automatic continuation**.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Dispatch 5 slash commands in sequence (including a quality gate), parse their outputs, pass context between them, and ensure complete execution through **automatic continuation**.
 
-**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow**:
+**Execution Model - Auto-Continue Workflow with Quality Gate**:
+
+This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 3 (conflict resolution) and Phase 4 (task generation) are delegated to specialized agents.
 
-This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Each phase completes, reports its output to you, then **immediately and automatically** proceeds to the next phase without requiring any user intervention.
 
 1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:plan "task"`
-2. **Phase 1 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
-3. **Phase 2 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
-4. **Phase 3 executes** → Reports output to user → Auto-continues
-5. **Phase 4 executes** → Reports final summary
+2. **Phase 1 dispatches** → Session discovery → Auto-continues
+3. **Phase 2 dispatches** → Context gathering → Auto-continues
+4. **Phase 3 dispatches** (optional, if conflict_risk ≥ medium) → Conflict resolution → Auto-continues
+5. **Phase 4 dispatches** → Task generation (task-generate-agent) → Reports final summary
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand dispatch **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is dispatched (e.g., `/workflow:tools:context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
 
 **Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
-- TodoList tracks current phase status
-- After each phase completion, automatically executes next pending phase
-- **No user action required** - workflow runs end-to-end autonomously
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction (clarification handled in brainstorm phase)
 - Progress updates shown at each phase for visibility
-
-**Execution Modes**:
-- **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate`
-- **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent`
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
 
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files, analyze structure, or gather context before Phase 1
-3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command's output for next phase
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command/agent output for next phase
 4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
-5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
-## 4-Phase Execution
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
+
+Phase 1: Session Discovery
+   └─ /workflow:session:start --auto "structured-description"
+      └─ Output: sessionId (WFS-xxx)
+
+Phase 2: Context Gathering
+   └─ /workflow:tools:context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
+      ├─ Tasks attached: Analyze structure → Identify integration → Generate package
+      └─ Output: contextPath + conflict_risk
+
+Phase 3: Conflict Resolution 
+   └─ Decision (conflict_risk check):
+      ├─ conflict_risk ≥ medium → Execute /workflow:tools:conflict-resolution
+      │   ├─ Tasks attached: Detect conflicts → Present to user → Apply strategies
+      │   └─ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts
+      └─ conflict_risk < medium → Skip to Phase 4
+
+Phase 4: Task Generation
+   └─ /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session sessionId
+      └─ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
+
+Return:
+   └─ Summary with recommended next steps
+```
+
+## 5-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
+
+**Step 1.1: Dispatch** - Create or discover workflow session
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"[structured-task-description]\"")
+```
 
 **Task Description Structure**:
 ```
@@ -69,7 +105,9 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **Validation**:
 - Session ID successfully extracted
-- Session directory `.workflow/[sessionId]/` exists
+- Session directory `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/` exists
+
+**Note**: Session directory contains `workflow-session.json` (metadata). Do NOT look for `manifest.json` here - it only exists in `.workflow/archives/` for archived sessions.
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
 
@@ -78,7 +116,12 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 ---
 
 ### Phase 2: Context Gathering
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
+
+**Step 2.1: Dispatch** - Gather project context and analyze codebase
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"[structured-task-description]\"")
+```
 
 **Use Same Structured Description**: Pass the same structured format from Phase 1
 
@@ -86,92 +129,234 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **Parse Output**:
 - Extract: context-package.json path (store as `contextPath`)
-- Typical pattern: `.workflow/[sessionId]/.context/context-package.json`
+- Typical pattern: `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/context-package.json`
 
 **Validation**:
 - Context package path extracted
 - File exists and is valid JSON
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When context-gather dispatched, INSERT 3 context-gather tasks, mark first as in_progress -->
 
-**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "  → Analyze codebase structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing codebase structure"},
+  {"content": "  → Identify integration points", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying integration points"},
+  {"content": "  → Generate context package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 2 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 2.1-2.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3/4 (depending on conflict_risk)
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 3: Intelligent Analysis
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+### Phase 3: Conflict Resolution
 
-**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1, `contextPath` from Phase 2
+**Trigger**: Only execute when context-package.json indicates conflict_risk is "medium" or "high"
+
+**Step 3.1: Dispatch** - Detect and resolve conflicts with CLI analysis
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")
+```
+
+**Input**:
+- sessionId from Phase 1
+- contextPath from Phase 2
+- conflict_risk from context-package.json
 
 **Parse Output**:
-- Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md created
+- Extract: Execution status (success/skipped/failed)
+- Verify: conflict-resolution.json file path (if executed)
 
 **Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/[sessionId]/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` exists
-- Contains task recommendations section
+- File `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/conflict-resolution.json` exists (if executed)
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+**Skip Behavior**:
+- If conflict_risk is "none" or "low", skip directly to Phase 3.5
+- Display: "No significant conflicts detected, proceeding to clarification"
 
-**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing Phase 3 results, then auto-continue to Phase 4
+<!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Conflict Resolution", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Present conflicts to user", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Apply resolution strategies", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Conflict Resolution", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing conflict resolution results (if executed) and selected strategies, then auto-continue to Phase 3.5
+
+**Memory State Check**:
+- Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
+- If memory usage is high (>120K tokens or approaching context limits):
+
+  **Step 3.2: Dispatch** - Optimize memory before proceeding
+
+  ```javascript
+  SlashCommand(command="/compact")
+  ```
+
+- Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
+- Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3.5: Pre-Task Generation Validation (Optional Quality Gate)
+
+**Purpose**: Optional quality gate before task generation - primarily handled by brainstorm synthesis phase
+
+
+**Current Behavior**: Auto-skip to Phase 4 (Task Generation)
+
+**Future Enhancement**: Could add additional validation steps like:
+- Cross-reference checks between conflict resolution and brainstorm analyses
+- Final sanity checks before task generation
+- User confirmation prompt for proceeding
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3.5 completed (auto-skip), phase 4 in_progress
+
+**After Phase 3.5**: Auto-continue to Phase 4 immediately
 
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Task Generation
 
 **Relationship with Brainstorm Phase**:
-- If brainstorm synthesis exists (synthesis-specification.md), Phase 3 analysis incorporates it as input
-- **synthesis-specification.md defines "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, high-level features
+- If brainstorm role analyses exist ([role]/analysis.md files), Phase 3 analysis incorporates them as input
+- **User's original intent is ALWAYS primary**: New or refined user goals override brainstorm recommendations
+- **Role analysis.md files define "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, role-specific insights
 - **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
-- Task generation translates high-level specifications into concrete, actionable work items
+- Task generation translates high-level role analyses into concrete, actionable work items
+- **Intent priority**: Current user prompt > role analysis.md files > guidance-specification.md
 
-**Command**:
-- Manual: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate --session [sessionId]")`
-- Agent: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")`
+**Step 4.1: Dispatch** - Generate implementation plan and task JSONs
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")
+```
+
+**CLI Execution Note**: CLI tool usage is now determined semantically by action-planning-agent based on user's task description. If user specifies "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen for X", the agent embeds `command` fields in relevant `implementation_approach` steps.
 
 **Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
 
 **Validation**:
-- `.workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` exists
-- `.workflow/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
-- `.workflow/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
+- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` exists
+- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
+- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed
+<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-agent dispatched, ATTACH 1 agent task -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand dispatched - agent task attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Single agent task attached. Agent autonomously completes discovery, planning, and output generation internally.
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After agent completes, mark task as completed -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Agent task completed. No collapse needed (single task).
 
 **Return to User**:
 ```
 Planning complete for session: [sessionId]
 Tasks generated: [count]
-Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+Plan: .workflow/active/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
 
-✅ Recommended Next Steps:
+Recommended Next Steps:
 1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify plan quality before execution
 2. /workflow:status  # Review task breakdown
 3. /workflow:execute  # Start implementation (after verification)
 
-⚠️ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues early
+Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues early
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-```javascript
-// Initialize (before Phase 1)
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute intelligent analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing intelligent analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
-]})
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for real-time visibility into workflow execution.
 
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute intelligent analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing intelligent analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
-]})
+### Key Principles
 
-// Continue pattern for Phase 2, 3, 4...
-```
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand dispatched):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks attached (e.g., Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
+   - **Phase 4**: Single agent task attached (e.g., "Execute task-generate-agent")
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - **Applies to Phase 2, 3**: Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 2.1-2.3 collapse to "Execute context gathering: completed"
+   - **Phase 4**: No collapse needed (single task, just mark completed)
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After completion, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase dispatched (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary for Phase 2/3, or marked completed for Phase 4) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions for detailed TodoWrite Update examples:
+- **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks with attach/collapse pattern
+- **Phase 4**: Single agent task (no collapse needed)
 
 ## Input Processing
 
@@ -202,12 +387,6 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
    - Extract goal, scope, requirements
    - Format into structured description
 
-4. **Issue Reference** (e.g., `ISS-001`) → Read and structure:
-   - Read issue file
-   - Extract title as goal
-   - Extract description as scope/context
-   - Format into structured description
-
 ## Data Flow
 
 ```
@@ -225,14 +404,22 @@ Phase 1: session:start --auto "structured-description"
     ↓
 Phase 2: context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
     ↓ Input: sessionId + session memory + structured description
-    ↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json)
+    ↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json) + conflict_risk
     ↓
-Phase 3: concept-enhanced --session sessionId --context contextPath
-    ↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + session memory
-    ↓ Output: ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+Phase 3: conflict-resolution [AUTO-TRIGGERED if conflict_risk ≥ medium]
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + conflict_risk
+    ↓ CLI-powered conflict detection (JSON output)
+    ↓ AskUserQuestion: Present conflicts + resolution strategies
+    ↓ User selects strategies (or skip)
+    ↓ Apply modifications via Edit tool:
+    ↓   - Update guidance-specification.md
+    ↓   - Update role analyses (*.md)
+    ↓   - Mark context-package.json as "resolved"
+    ↓ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts (NO report file)
+    ↓ Skip if conflict_risk is none/low → proceed directly to Phase 4
     ↓
-Phase 4: task-generate[--agent] --session sessionId
-    ↓ Input: sessionId + ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md + session memory
+Phase 4: task-generate-agent --session sessionId
+    ↓ Input: sessionId + resolved brainstorm artifacts + session memory
     ↓ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
     ↓
 Return summary to user
@@ -241,14 +428,58 @@ Return summary to user
 **Session Memory Flow**: Each phase receives session ID, which provides access to:
 - Previous task summaries
 - Existing context and analysis
-- Brainstorming artifacts
+- Brainstorming artifacts (potentially modified by Phase 3)
 - Session-specific configuration
 
-**Structured Description Benefits**:
-- **Clarity**: Clear separation of goal, scope, and context
-- **Consistency**: Same format across all phases
-- **Traceability**: Easy to track what was requested
-- **Precision**: Better context gathering and analysis
+
+## Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+User triggers: /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
+  ↓
+[TodoWrite Init] 3 orchestrator-level tasks
+  ↓
+Phase 1: Session Discovery
+  → sessionId extracted
+  ↓
+Phase 2: Context Gathering (SlashCommand dispatched)
+  → ATTACH 3 sub-tasks: ← ATTACHED
+    - → Analyze codebase structure
+    - → Identify integration points
+    - → Generate context package
+  → Execute sub-tasks sequentially
+  → COLLAPSE tasks ← COLLAPSED
+  → contextPath + conflict_risk extracted
+  ↓
+Conditional Branch: Check conflict_risk
+  ├─ IF conflict_risk ≥ medium:
+  │   Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (SlashCommand dispatched)
+  │     → ATTACH 3 sub-tasks: ← ATTACHED
+  │       - → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis
+  │       - → Present conflicts to user
+  │       - → Apply resolution strategies
+  │     → Execute sub-tasks sequentially
+  │     → COLLAPSE tasks ← COLLAPSED
+  │
+  └─ ELSE: Skip Phase 3, proceed to Phase 4
+  ↓
+Phase 4: Task Generation (SlashCommand dispatched)
+  → Single agent task (no sub-tasks)
+  → Agent autonomously completes internally:
+    (discovery → planning → output)
+  → Outputs: IMPL_PLAN.md, IMPL-*.json, TODO_LIST.md
+  ↓
+Return summary to user
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+- **← ATTACHED**: Tasks attached to TodoWrite when SlashCommand dispatched
+  - Phase 2, 3: Multiple sub-tasks
+  - Phase 4: Single agent task
+- **← COLLAPSED**: Sub-tasks collapsed to summary after completion (Phase 2, 3 only)
+- **Phase 4**: Single agent task, no collapse (just mark completed)
+- **Conditional Branch**: Phase 3 only dispatches if conflict_risk ≥ medium
+- **Continuous Flow**: No user intervention between phases
 
 ## Error Handling
 
@@ -258,19 +489,21 @@ Return summary to user
 
 ## Coordinator Checklist
 
-✅ **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
-✅ Initialize TodoWrite before any command
-✅ Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
-✅ Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
-✅ Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
-✅ Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
-✅ Pass session ID and context path to Phase 3 command
-✅ Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md after Phase 3
-✅ Select correct Phase 4 command based on --agent flag
-✅ Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
-✅ Verify all Phase 4 outputs
-✅ Update TodoWrite after each phase
-✅ After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
+- **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
+- Initialize TodoWrite before any command (Phase 3 added dynamically after Phase 2)
+- Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
+- Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
+- Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
+- Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
+- **Extract conflict_risk from context-package.json**: Determine Phase 3 execution
+- **If conflict_risk ≥ medium**: Launch Phase 3 conflict-resolution with sessionId and contextPath
+- Wait for Phase 3 to finish executing (if executed), verify conflict-resolution.json created
+- **If conflict_risk is none/low**: Skip Phase 3, proceed directly to Phase 4
+- **Build Phase 4 command**: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]`
+- Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
+- Verify all Phase 4 outputs
+- Update TodoWrite after each phase (dynamically adjust for Phase 3 presence)
+- After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
 
 ## Structure Template Reference
 
@@ -297,4 +530,22 @@ CONSTRAINTS: [Limitations or boundaries]
 
 # Phase 2
 /workflow:tools:context-gather --session WFS-123 "GOAL: Build authentication\nSCOPE: JWT, login, registration\nCONTEXT: REST API"
-```
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` - Optional: Generate role-based analyses before planning (if complex requirements need multiple perspectives)
+- `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` - Optional: Refine brainstorm analyses with clarifications
+
+**Called by This Command** (5 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create or discover workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2: Gather project context and analyze codebase
+- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 3: Detect and resolve conflicts (auto-triggered if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
+- `/compact` - Phase 3: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent` - Phase 4: Generate task JSON files with agent-driven approach
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:action-plan-verify` - Recommended: Verify plan quality and catch issues before execution
+- `/workflow:status` - Review task breakdown and current progress
+- `/workflow:execute` - Begin implementation of generated tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/replan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,515 @@
+---
+name: replan
+description: Interactive workflow replanning with session-level artifact updates and boundary clarification through guided questioning
+argument-hint: "[--session session-id] [task-id] \"requirements\"|file.md [--interactive]"
+allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Replan Command
+
+## Overview
+Intelligently replans workflow sessions or individual tasks with interactive boundary clarification and comprehensive artifact updates.
+
+**Core Capabilities**:
+- **Session Replan**: Updates multiple artifacts (IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md, task JSONs)
+- **Task Replan**: Focused updates within session context
+- **Interactive Clarification**: Guided questioning to define modification boundaries
+- **Impact Analysis**: Automatic detection of affected files and dependencies
+- **Backup Management**: Preserves previous versions with restore capability
+
+## Operation Modes
+
+### Session Replan Mode
+
+```bash
+# Auto-detect active session
+/workflow:replan "添加双因素认证支持"
+
+# Explicit session
+/workflow:replan --session WFS-oauth "添加双因素认证支持"
+
+# File-based input
+/workflow:replan --session WFS-oauth requirements-update.md
+
+# Interactive mode
+/workflow:replan --interactive
+```
+
+### Task Replan Mode
+
+```bash
+# Direct task update
+/workflow:replan IMPL-1 "修改为使用 OAuth2.0 标准"
+
+# Task with explicit session
+/workflow:replan --session WFS-oauth IMPL-2 "增加单元测试覆盖率到 90%"
+
+# Interactive mode
+/workflow:replan IMPL-1 --interactive
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session, --interactive
+   └─ Detect mode: task-id present → Task mode | Otherwise → Session mode
+
+Phase 1: Mode Detection & Session Discovery
+   ├─ Detect operation mode (Task vs Session)
+   ├─ Discover/validate session (--session flag or auto-detect)
+   └─ Load session context (workflow-session.json, IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md)
+
+Phase 2: Interactive Requirement Clarification
+   └─ Decision (by mode):
+      ├─ Session mode → 3-4 questions (scope, modules, changes, dependencies)
+      └─ Task mode → 2 questions (update type, ripple effect)
+
+Phase 3: Impact Analysis & Planning
+   ├─ Analyze required changes
+   ├─ Generate modification plan
+   └─ User confirmation (Execute / Adjust / Cancel)
+
+Phase 4: Backup Creation
+   └─ Backup all affected files with manifest
+
+Phase 5: Apply Modifications
+   ├─ Update IMPL_PLAN.md (if needed)
+   ├─ Update TODO_LIST.md (if needed)
+   ├─ Update/Create/Delete task JSONs
+   └─ Update session metadata
+
+Phase 6: Verification & Summary
+   ├─ Validate consistency (JSON validity, task limits, acyclic dependencies)
+   └─ Generate change summary
+```
+
+## Execution Lifecycle
+
+### Input Parsing
+
+**Parse flags**:
+```javascript
+const sessionFlag = $ARGUMENTS.match(/--session\s+(\S+)/)?.[1]
+const interactive = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--interactive')
+const taskIdMatch = $ARGUMENTS.match(/\b(IMPL-\d+(?:\.\d+)?)\b/)
+const taskId = taskIdMatch?.[1]
+```
+
+### Phase 1: Mode Detection & Session Discovery
+
+**Process**:
+1. **Detect Operation Mode**:
+   - Check if task ID provided (IMPL-N or IMPL-N.M format) → Task mode
+   - Otherwise → Session mode
+
+2. **Discover/Validate Session**:
+   - Use `--session` flag if provided
+   - Otherwise auto-detect from `.workflow/active/`
+   - Validate session exists
+
+3. **Load Session Context**:
+   - Read `workflow-session.json`
+   - List existing tasks
+   - Read `IMPL_PLAN.md` and `TODO_LIST.md`
+
+**Output**: Session validated, context loaded, mode determined
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Interactive Requirement Clarification
+
+**Purpose**: Define modification scope through guided questioning
+
+#### Session Mode Questions
+
+**Q1: Modification Scope**
+```javascript
+Options:
+- 仅更新任务细节 (tasks_only)
+- 修改规划方案 (plan_update)
+- 重构任务结构 (task_restructure)
+- 全面重规划 (comprehensive)
+```
+
+**Q2: Affected Modules** (if scope >= plan_update)
+```javascript
+Options: Dynamically generated from existing tasks' focus_paths
+- 认证模块 (src/auth)
+- 用户管理 (src/user)
+- 全部模块
+```
+
+**Q3: Task Changes** (if scope >= task_restructure)
+```javascript
+Options:
+- 添加/删除任务 (add_remove)
+- 合并/拆分任务 (merge_split)
+- 仅更新内容 (update_only)
+// Note: Max 4 options for AskUserQuestion
+```
+
+**Q4: Dependency Changes**
+```javascript
+Options:
+- 是,需要重新梳理依赖
+- 否,保持现有依赖
+```
+
+#### Task Mode Questions
+
+**Q1: Update Type**
+```javascript
+Options:
+- 需求和验收标准 (requirements & acceptance)
+- 实现方案 (implementation_approach)
+- 文件范围 (focus_paths)
+- 依赖关系 (depends_on)
+- 全部更新
+```
+
+**Q2: Ripple Effect**
+```javascript
+Options:
+- 是,需要同步更新依赖任务
+- 否,仅影响当前任务
+- 不确定,请帮我分析
+```
+
+**Output**: User selections stored, modification boundaries defined
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Impact Analysis & Planning
+
+**Step 3.1: Analyze Required Changes**
+
+Determine affected files based on clarification:
+
+```typescript
+interface ImpactAnalysis {
+  affected_files: {
+    impl_plan: boolean;
+    todo_list: boolean;
+    session_meta: boolean;
+    tasks: string[];
+  };
+
+  operations: {
+    type: 'create' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'merge' | 'split';
+    target: string;
+    reason: string;
+  }[];
+
+  backup_strategy: {
+    timestamp: string;
+    files: string[];
+  };
+}
+```
+
+**Step 3.2: Generate Modification Plan**
+
+```markdown
+## 修改计划
+
+### 影响范围
+- [ ] IMPL_PLAN.md: 更新技术方案第 3 节
+- [ ] TODO_LIST.md: 添加 2 个新任务,删除 1 个废弃任务
+- [ ] IMPL-001.json: 更新实现方案
+- [ ] workflow-session.json: 更新任务计数
+
+### 变更操作
+1. **创建**: IMPL-004.json (双因素认证实现)
+2. **更新**: IMPL-001.json (添加 2FA 准备工作)
+3. **删除**: IMPL-003.json (已被新方案替代)
+```
+
+**Step 3.3: User Confirmation**
+
+```javascript
+Options:
+- 确认执行: 开始应用所有修改
+- 调整计划: 重新回答问题调整范围
+- 取消操作: 放弃本次重规划
+```
+
+**Output**: Modification plan confirmed or adjusted
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Backup Creation
+
+**Process**:
+
+1. **Create Backup Directory**:
+```bash
+timestamp=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H-%M-%S")
+backup_dir=".workflow/active/$SESSION_ID/.process/backup/replan-$timestamp"
+mkdir -p "$backup_dir"
+```
+
+2. **Backup All Affected Files**:
+   - IMPL_PLAN.md
+   - TODO_LIST.md
+   - workflow-session.json
+   - Affected task JSONs
+
+3. **Create Backup Manifest**:
+```markdown
+# Replan Backup Manifest
+
+**Timestamp**: {timestamp}
+**Reason**: {replan_reason}
+**Scope**: {modification_scope}
+
+## Restoration Command
+cp {backup_dir}/* .workflow/active/{session}/
+```
+
+**Output**: All files safely backed up with manifest
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Apply Modifications
+
+**Step 5.1: Update IMPL_PLAN.md** (if needed)
+
+Use Edit tool to modify specific sections:
+- Update affected technical sections
+- Update modification date
+
+**Step 5.2: Update TODO_LIST.md** (if needed)
+
+- Add new tasks with `[ ]` checkbox
+- Mark deleted tasks as `[x] ~~task~~ (已废弃)`
+- Update modified task descriptions
+
+**Step 5.3: Update Task JSONs**
+
+For each affected task:
+```typescript
+const updated_task = {
+  ...task,
+  context: {
+    ...task.context,
+    requirements: [...updated_requirements],
+    acceptance: [...updated_acceptance]
+  },
+  flow_control: {
+    ...task.flow_control,
+    implementation_approach: [...updated_steps]
+  }
+};
+
+Write({
+  file_path: `.workflow/active/${SESSION_ID}/.task/${task_id}.json`,
+  content: JSON.stringify(updated_task, null, 2)
+});
+```
+
+**Step 5.4: Create New Tasks** (if needed)
+
+Generate complete task JSON with all required fields:
+- id, title, status
+- meta (type, agent)
+- context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance)
+- flow_control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach, target_files)
+
+**Step 5.5: Delete Obsolete Tasks** (if needed)
+
+Move to backup instead of hard delete:
+```bash
+mv ".workflow/active/$SESSION_ID/.task/{task-id}.json" "$backup_dir/"
+```
+
+**Step 5.6: Update Session Metadata**
+
+Update workflow-session.json:
+- progress.current_tasks
+- progress.last_replan
+- replan_history array
+
+**Output**: All modifications applied, artifacts updated
+
+---
+
+### Phase 6: Verification & Summary
+
+**Step 6.1: Verify Consistency**
+
+1. Validate all task JSONs are valid JSON
+2. Check task count within limits (max 10)
+3. Verify dependency graph is acyclic
+
+**Step 6.2: Generate Change Summary**
+
+```markdown
+## 重规划完成
+
+### 会话信息
+- **Session**: {session-id}
+- **时间**: {timestamp}
+- **备份**: {backup-path}
+
+### 变更摘要
+**范围**: {scope}
+**原因**: {reason}
+
+### 修改的文件
+- ✓ IMPL_PLAN.md: {changes}
+- ✓ TODO_LIST.md: {changes}
+- ✓ Task JSONs: {count} files updated
+
+### 任务变更
+- **新增**: {task-ids}
+- **删除**: {task-ids}
+- **更新**: {task-ids}
+
+### 回滚方法
+cp {backup-path}/* .workflow/active/{session}/
+```
+
+**Output**: Summary displayed, replan complete
+
+---
+
+## TodoWrite Progress Tracking
+
+### Session Mode Progress
+
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "检测模式和发现会话", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "检测模式和发现会话"},
+  {"content": "交互式需求明确", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "交互式需求明确"},
+  {"content": "影响分析和计划生成", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "影响分析和计划生成"},
+  {"content": "创建备份", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "创建备份"},
+  {"content": "更新会话产出文件", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "更新会话产出文件"},
+  {"content": "验证一致性", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "验证一致性"}
+]
+```
+
+### Task Mode Progress
+
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "检测会话和加载任务", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "检测会话和加载任务"},
+  {"content": "交互式更新确认", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "交互式更新确认"},
+  {"content": "应用任务修改", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "应用任务修改"}
+]
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+### Session Errors
+
+```bash
+# No active session found
+ERROR: No active session found
+Run /workflow:session:start to create a session
+
+# Session not found
+ERROR: Session WFS-invalid not found
+Available sessions: [list]
+
+# No changes specified
+WARNING: No modifications specified
+Use --interactive mode or provide requirements
+```
+
+### Task Errors
+
+```bash
+# Task not found
+ERROR: Task IMPL-999 not found in session
+Available tasks: [list]
+
+# Task completed
+WARNING: Task IMPL-001 is completed
+Consider creating new task for additional work
+
+# Circular dependency
+ERROR: Circular dependency detected
+Resolve dependency conflicts before proceeding
+```
+
+### Validation Errors
+
+```bash
+# Task limit exceeded
+ERROR: Replan would create 12 tasks (limit: 10)
+Consider: combining tasks, splitting sessions, or removing tasks
+
+# Invalid JSON
+ERROR: Generated invalid JSON
+Backup preserved, rolling back changes
+```
+
+## File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-session-name/
+├── workflow-session.json
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+│   ├── IMPL-001.json
+│   ├── IMPL-002.json
+│   └── IMPL-003.json
+└── .process/
+    ├── context-package.json
+    └── backup/
+        └── replan-{timestamp}/
+            ├── MANIFEST.md
+            ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+            ├── TODO_LIST.md
+            ├── workflow-session.json
+            └── IMPL-*.json
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+### Session Replan - Add Feature
+
+```bash
+/workflow:replan "添加双因素认证支持"
+
+# Interactive clarification
+Q: 修改范围?
+A: 全面重规划
+
+Q: 受影响模块?
+A: 认证模块, API接口
+
+Q: 任务变更?
+A: 添加新任务, 更新内容
+
+# Execution
+✓ 创建备份
+✓ 更新 IMPL_PLAN.md
+✓ 更新 TODO_LIST.md
+✓ 创建 IMPL-004.json
+✓ 更新 IMPL-001.json, IMPL-002.json
+
+重规划完成! 新增 1 任务,更新 2 任务
+```
+
+### Task Replan - Update Requirements
+
+```bash
+/workflow:replan IMPL-001 "支持 OAuth2.0 标准"
+
+# Interactive clarification
+Q: 更新部分?
+A: 需求和验收标准, 实现方案
+
+Q: 影响其他任务?
+A: 是,需要同步更新依赖任务
+
+# Execution
+✓ 创建备份
+✓ 更新 IMPL-001.json
+✓ 更新 IMPL-002.json (依赖任务)
+
+任务重规划完成! 更新 2 个任务
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/resume.md

@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
----
-name: resume
-description: Intelligent workflow session resumption with automatic progress analysis
-usage: /workflow:resume "<session-id>"
-argument-hint: "session-id for workflow session to resume"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:resume "WFS-user-auth"
-  - /workflow:resume "WFS-api-integration"
-  - /workflow:resume "WFS-database-migration"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
----
-
-# Sequential Workflow Resume Command
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:resume "<session-id>"
-```
-
-## Purpose
-**Sequential command coordination for workflow resumption** by first analyzing current session status, then continuing execution with special resume context. This command orchestrates intelligent session resumption through two-step process.
-
-## Command Coordination Workflow
-
-### Phase 1: Status Analysis
-1. **Call status command**: Execute `/workflow:status` to analyze current session state
-2. **Verify session information**: Check session ID, progress, and current task status
-3. **Identify resume point**: Determine where workflow was interrupted
-
-### Phase 2: Resume Execution
-1. **Call execute with resume flag**: Execute `/workflow:execute --resume-session="{session-id}"`
-2. **Pass session context**: Provide analyzed session information to execute command
-3. **Direct agent execution**: Skip discovery phase, directly enter TodoWrite and agent execution
-
-## Implementation Protocol
-
-### Sequential Command Execution
-```bash
-# Phase 1: Analyze current session status
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:status")
-
-# Phase 2: Resume execution with special flag
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:execute --resume-session=\"{session-id}\"")
-```
-
-### Progress Tracking
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    {
-      content: "Analyze current session status and progress",
-      status: "in_progress",
-      activeForm: "Analyzing session status"
-    },
-    {
-      content: "Resume workflow execution with session context",
-      status: "pending",
-      activeForm: "Resuming workflow execution"
-    }
-  ]
-});
-```
-
-## Resume Information Flow
-
-### Status Analysis Results
-The `/workflow:status` command provides:
-- **Session ID**: Current active session identifier
-- **Current Progress**: Completed, in-progress, and pending tasks
-- **Interruption Point**: Last executed task and next pending task
-- **Session State**: Overall workflow status
-
-### Execute Command Context
-The special `--resume-session` flag tells `/workflow:execute`:
-- **Skip Discovery**: Don't search for sessions, use provided session ID
-- **Direct Execution**: Go straight to TodoWrite generation and agent launching
-- **Context Restoration**: Use existing session state and summaries
-- **Resume Point**: Continue from identified interruption point
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Session Validation Failures
-- **Session not found**: Report missing session, suggest available sessions
-- **Session inactive**: Recommend activating session first
-- **Status command fails**: Retry once, then report analysis failure
-
-### Execute Resumption Failures
-- **No pending tasks**: Report workflow completion status
-- **Execute command fails**: Report resumption failure, suggest manual intervention
-
-## Success Criteria
-1. **Status analysis complete**: Session state properly analyzed and reported
-2. **Execute command launched**: Resume execution started with proper context
-3. **Agent coordination**: TodoWrite and agent execution initiated successfully
-4. **Context preservation**: Session state and progress properly maintained
-
----
-*Sequential command coordination for workflow session resumption*

.claude/commands/workflow/review-fix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,606 @@
+---
+name: review-fix
+description: Automated fixing of code review findings with AI-powered planning and coordinated execution. Uses intelligent grouping, multi-stage timeline coordination, and test-driven verification.
+argument-hint: "<export-file|review-dir> [--resume] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), Edit(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Fix Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Fix from exported findings file (session-based path)
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/fix-export-1706184622000.json
+
+# Fix from review directory (auto-discovers latest export)
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/
+
+# Resume interrupted fix session
+/workflow:review-fix --resume
+
+# Custom max retry attempts per finding
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/ --max-iterations=5
+```
+
+**Fix Source**: Exported findings from review cycle dashboard
+**Output Directory**: `{review-dir}/fixes/{fix-session-id}/` (within session .review/)
+**Default Max Iterations**: 3 (per finding, adjustable)
+**CLI Tools**: @cli-planning-agent (planning), @cli-execute-agent (fixing)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Automated fix orchestrator with **two-phase architecture**: AI-powered planning followed by coordinated parallel/serial execution. Generates fix timeline with intelligent grouping and dependency analysis, then executes fixes with conservative test verification.
+
+**Fix Process**:
+- **Planning Phase**: AI analyzes findings, generates fix plan with grouping and execution strategy
+- **Execution Phase**: Main orchestrator coordinates agents per timeline stages
+- **No rigid structure**: Adapts to task requirements, not bound to fixed JSON format
+
+**vs Manual Fixing**:
+- **Manual**: Developer reviews findings one-by-one, fixes sequentially
+- **Automated**: AI groups related issues, executes in optimal parallel/serial order with automatic test verification
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Intelligent Planning**: AI-powered analysis identifies optimal grouping and execution strategy
+2. **Multi-stage Coordination**: Supports complex parallel + serial execution with dependency management
+3. **Conservative Safety**: Mandatory test verification with automatic rollback on failure
+4. **Resume Support**: Checkpoint-based recovery for interrupted sessions
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for automated review finding fixes
+- Manages: Planning phase coordination, stage-based execution, agent scheduling, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Fix planning to @cli-planning-agent, fix execution to @cli-execute-agent
+
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Validate export file, create fix session structure, initialize state files
+
+Phase 2: Planning Coordination (@cli-planning-agent)
+   ├─ Analyze findings for patterns and dependencies
+   ├─ Group by file + dimension + root cause similarity
+   ├─ Determine execution strategy (parallel/serial/hybrid)
+   ├─ Generate fix timeline with stages
+   └─ Output: fix-plan.json
+
+Phase 3: Execution Orchestration (Stage-based)
+   For each timeline stage:
+   ├─ Load groups for this stage
+   ├─ If parallel: Launch all group agents simultaneously
+   ├─ If serial: Execute groups sequentially
+   ├─ Each agent:
+   │  ├─ Analyze code context
+   │  ├─ Apply fix per strategy
+   │  ├─ Run affected tests
+   │  ├─ On test failure: Rollback, retry up to max_iterations
+   │  └─ On success: Commit, update fix-progress-{N}.json
+   └─ Advance to next stage
+
+Phase 4: Completion & Aggregation
+   └─ Aggregate results → Generate fix-summary.md → Update history → Output summary
+
+Phase 5: Session Completion (Optional)
+   └─ If all fixes successful → Prompt to complete workflow session
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Input validation, session management, planning coordination, stage-based execution scheduling, progress tracking, aggregation |
+| **@cli-planning-agent** | Findings analysis, intelligent grouping (file+dimension+root cause), execution strategy determination (parallel/serial/hybrid), timeline generation with dependency mapping |
+| **@cli-execute-agent** | Fix execution per group, code context analysis, Edit tool operations, test verification, git rollback on failure, completion JSON generation |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Two-Phase Architecture
+
+**Phase Separation**:
+
+| Phase | Agent | Output | Purpose |
+|-------|-------|--------|---------|
+| **Planning** | @cli-planning-agent | fix-plan.json | Analyze findings, group intelligently, determine optimal execution strategy |
+| **Execution** | @cli-execute-agent | completions/*.json | Execute fixes per plan with test verification and rollback |
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Clear separation of concerns (analysis vs execution)
+- Reusable plans (can re-execute without re-planning)
+- Better error isolation (planning failures vs execution failures)
+
+### 2. Intelligent Grouping Strategy
+
+**Three-Level Grouping**:
+
+```javascript
+// Level 1: Primary grouping by file + dimension
+{file: "auth.ts", dimension: "security"} → Group A
+{file: "auth.ts", dimension: "quality"} → Group B
+{file: "query-builder.ts", dimension: "security"} → Group C
+
+// Level 2: Secondary grouping by root cause similarity
+Group A findings → Semantic similarity analysis (threshold 0.7)
+  → Sub-group A1: "missing-input-validation" (findings 1, 2)
+  → Sub-group A2: "insecure-crypto" (finding 3)
+
+// Level 3: Dependency analysis
+Sub-group A1 creates validation utilities
+Sub-group C4 depends on those utilities
+→ A1 must execute before C4 (serial stage dependency)
+```
+
+**Similarity Computation**:
+- Combine: `description + recommendation + category`
+- Vectorize: TF-IDF or LLM embedding
+- Cluster: Greedy algorithm with cosine similarity > 0.7
+
+### 3. Execution Strategy Determination
+
+**Strategy Types**:
+
+| Strategy | When to Use | Stage Structure |
+|----------|-------------|-----------------|
+| **Parallel** | All groups independent, different files | Single stage, all groups in parallel |
+| **Serial** | Strong dependencies, shared resources | Multiple stages, one group per stage |
+| **Hybrid** | Mixed dependencies | Multiple stages, parallel within stages |
+
+**Dependency Detection**:
+- Shared file modifications
+- Utility creation + usage patterns
+- Test dependency chains
+- Risk level clustering (high-risk groups isolated)
+
+### 4. Conservative Test Verification
+
+**Test Strategy** (per fix):
+
+```javascript
+// 1. Identify affected tests
+const testPattern = identifyTestPattern(finding.file);
+// e.g., "tests/auth/**/*.test.*" for src/auth/service.ts
+
+// 2. Run tests
+const result = await runTests(testPattern);
+
+// 3. Evaluate
+if (result.passRate < 100%) {
+  // Rollback
+  await gitCheckout(finding.file);
+
+  // Retry with failure context
+  if (attempts < maxIterations) {
+    const fixContext = analyzeFailure(result.stderr);
+    regenerateFix(finding, fixContext);
+    retry();
+  } else {
+    markFailed(finding.id);
+  }
+} else {
+  // Commit
+  await gitCommit(`Fix: ${finding.title} [${finding.id}]`);
+  markFixed(finding.id);
+}
+```
+
+**Pass Criteria**: 100% test pass rate (no partial fixes)
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+- Input validation: Check export file exists and is valid JSON
+- Auto-discovery: If review-dir provided, find latest `*-fix-export.json`
+- Session creation: Generate fix-session-id (`fix-{timestamp}`)
+- Directory structure: Create `{review-dir}/fixes/{fix-session-id}/` with subdirectories
+- State files: Initialize active-fix-session.json (session marker)
+- TodoWrite initialization: Set up 4-phase tracking
+
+**Phase 2: Planning Coordination**
+- Launch @cli-planning-agent with findings data and project context
+- Validate fix-plan.json output (schema conformance, includes metadata with session status)
+- Load plan into memory for execution phase
+- TodoWrite update: Mark planning complete, start execution
+
+**Phase 3: Execution Orchestration**
+- Load fix-plan.json timeline stages
+- For each stage:
+  - If parallel mode: Launch all group agents via `Promise.all()`
+  - If serial mode: Execute groups sequentially with `await`
+  - Assign agent IDs (agents update their fix-progress-{N}.json)
+- Handle agent failures gracefully (mark group as failed, continue)
+- Advance to next stage only when current stage complete
+
+**Phase 4: Completion & Aggregation**
+- Collect final status from all fix-progress-{N}.json files
+- Generate fix-summary.md with timeline and results
+- Update fix-history.json with new session entry
+- Remove active-fix-session.json
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all phases done
+- Output summary to user
+
+**Phase 5: Session Completion (Optional)**
+- If all findings fixed successfully (no failures):
+  - Prompt user: "All fixes complete. Complete workflow session? [Y/n]"
+  - If confirmed: Execute `/workflow:session:complete` to archive session with lessons learned
+- If partial success (some failures):
+  - Output: "Some findings failed. Review fix-summary.md before completing session."
+  - Do NOT auto-complete session
+
+### Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── fix-export-{timestamp}.json     # Exported findings (input)
+└── fixes/{fix-session-id}/
+    ├── fix-plan.json               # Planning agent output (execution plan with metadata)
+    ├── fix-progress-1.json         # Group 1 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
+    ├── fix-progress-2.json         # Group 2 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
+    ├── fix-progress-3.json         # Group 3 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
+    ├── fix-summary.md              # Final report (orchestrator generates)
+    ├── active-fix-session.json     # Active session marker
+    └── fix-history.json            # All sessions history
+```
+
+**File Producers**:
+- **Planning Agent**: `fix-plan.json` (with metadata), all `fix-progress-*.json` (initial state)
+- **Execution Agents**: Update assigned `fix-progress-{N}.json` in real-time
+
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Planning Agent**:
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-planning-agent",
+  description: `Generate fix plan and initialize progress files for ${findings.length} findings`,
+  prompt: `
+## Task Objective
+Analyze ${findings.length} code review findings and generate execution plan with intelligent grouping and timeline coordination.
+
+## Input Data
+Review Session: ${reviewId}
+Fix Session ID: ${fixSessionId}
+Total Findings: ${findings.length}
+
+Findings:
+${JSON.stringify(findings, null, 2)}
+
+Project Context:
+- Structure: ${projectStructure}
+- Test Framework: ${testFramework}
+- Git Status: ${gitStatus}
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+### 1. fix-plan.json
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/fix-plan-template.json
+
+Generate execution plan following template structure:
+
+**Key Generation Rules**:
+- **Metadata**: Populate fix_session_id, review_session_id, status ("planning"), created_at, started_at timestamps
+- **Execution Strategy**: Choose approach (parallel/serial/hybrid) based on dependency analysis, set parallel_limit and stages count
+- **Groups**: Create groups (G1, G2, ...) with intelligent grouping (see Analysis Requirements below), assign progress files (fix-progress-1.json, ...), populate fix_strategy with approach/complexity/test_pattern, assess risks, identify dependencies
+- **Timeline**: Define stages respecting dependencies, set execution_mode per stage, map groups to stages, calculate critical path
+
+### 2. fix-progress-{N}.json (one per group)
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/fix-progress-template.json
+
+For each group (G1, G2, G3, ...), generate fix-progress-{N}.json following template structure:
+
+**Initial State Requirements**:
+- Status: "pending", phase: "waiting"
+- Timestamps: Set last_update to now, others null
+- Findings: Populate from review findings with status "pending", all operation fields null
+- Summary: Initialize all counters to zero
+- Flow control: Empty implementation_approach array
+- Errors: Empty array
+
+**CRITICAL**: Ensure complete template structure - all fields must be present.
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+
+### Intelligent Grouping Strategy
+Group findings using these criteria (in priority order):
+
+1. **File Proximity**: Findings in same file or related files
+2. **Dimension Affinity**: Same dimension (security, performance, etc.)
+3. **Root Cause Similarity**: Similar underlying issues
+4. **Fix Approach Commonality**: Can be fixed with similar approach
+
+**Grouping Guidelines**:
+- Optimal group size: 2-5 findings per group
+- Avoid cross-cutting concerns in same group
+- Consider test isolation (different test suites → different groups)
+- Balance workload across groups for parallel execution
+
+### Execution Strategy Determination
+
+**Parallel Mode**: Use when groups are independent, no shared files
+**Serial Mode**: Use when groups have dependencies or shared resources
+**Hybrid Mode**: Use for mixed dependency graphs (recommended for most cases)
+
+**Dependency Analysis**:
+- Identify shared files between groups
+- Detect test dependency chains
+- Evaluate risk of concurrent modifications
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+For each group, evaluate:
+- **Complexity**: Based on code structure, file size, existing tests
+- **Impact Scope**: Number of files affected, API surface changes
+- **Rollback Feasibility**: Ease of reverting changes if tests fail
+
+### Test Strategy
+
+For each group, determine:
+- **Test Pattern**: Glob pattern matching affected tests
+- **Pass Criteria**: All tests must pass (100% pass rate)
+- **Test Command**: Infer from project (package.json, pytest.ini, etc.)
+
+## Output Files
+
+Write to ${sessionDir}:
+- ./fix-plan.json
+- ./fix-progress-1.json
+- ./fix-progress-2.json
+- ./fix-progress-{N}.json (as many as groups created)
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before finalizing outputs:
+- ✅ All findings assigned to exactly one group
+- ✅ Group dependencies correctly identified
+- ✅ Timeline stages respect dependencies
+- ✅ All progress files have complete initial structure
+- ✅ Test patterns are valid and specific
+- ✅ Risk assessments are realistic
+- ✅ Estimated times are reasonable
+  `
+})
+```
+
+**Execution Agent** (per group):
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-execute-agent",
+  description: `Fix ${group.findings.length} issues: ${group.group_name}`,
+  prompt: `
+## Task Objective
+Execute fixes for code review findings in group ${group.group_id}. Update progress file in real-time with flow control tracking.
+
+## Assignment
+- Group ID: ${group.group_id}
+- Group Name: ${group.group_name}
+- Progress File: ${sessionDir}/${group.progress_file}
+- Findings Count: ${group.findings.length}
+- Max Iterations: ${maxIterations} (per finding)
+
+## Fix Strategy
+${JSON.stringify(group.fix_strategy, null, 2)}
+
+## Risk Assessment
+${JSON.stringify(group.risk_assessment, null, 2)}
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Initialization (Before Starting)
+
+1. Read ${group.progress_file} to load initial state
+2. Update progress file:
+   - assigned_agent: "${agentId}"
+   - status: "in-progress"
+   - started_at: Current ISO 8601 timestamp
+   - last_update: Current ISO 8601 timestamp
+3. Write updated state back to ${group.progress_file}
+
+### Main Execution Loop
+
+For EACH finding in ${group.progress_file}.findings:
+
+#### Step 1: Analyze Context
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update finding: status→"in-progress", started_at→now()
+- Update current_finding: Populate with finding details, status→"analyzing", action→"Reading file and understanding code structure"
+- Update phase→"analyzing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "analyze_context" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"analyze_context"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Read file: finding.file
+- Understand code structure around line: finding.line
+- Analyze surrounding context (imports, dependencies, related functions)
+- Review recommendations: finding.recommendations
+
+**After Step**:
+- Update flow_control: Mark "analyze_context" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+#### Step 2: Apply Fix
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update current_finding: status→"fixing", action→"Applying code changes per recommendations"
+- Update phase→"fixing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "apply_fix" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"apply_fix"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Use Edit tool to implement code changes per finding.recommendations
+- Follow fix_strategy.approach
+- Maintain code style and existing patterns
+
+**After Step**:
+- Update flow_control: Mark "apply_fix" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+#### Step 3: Test Verification
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update current_finding: status→"testing", action→"Running test suite to verify fix"
+- Update phase→"testing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "run_tests" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"run_tests"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Run tests using fix_strategy.test_pattern
+- Require 100% pass rate
+- Capture test output
+
+**On Test Failure**:
+- Git rollback: \`git checkout -- \${finding.file}\`
+- Increment finding.attempts
+- Update flow_control: Mark "run_tests" step as "failed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update errors: Add entry (finding_id, error_type→"test_failure", message, timestamp)
+- If finding.attempts < ${maxIterations}:
+  - Reset flow_control: implementation_approach→[], current_step→null
+  - Retry from Step 1
+- Else:
+  - Update finding: status→"completed", result→"failed", error_message→"Max iterations reached", completed_at→now()
+  - Update summary counts, move to next finding
+
+**On Test Success**:
+- Update flow_control: Mark "run_tests" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+- Proceed to Step 4
+
+#### Step 4: Commit Changes
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update current_finding: status→"committing", action→"Creating git commit for successful fix"
+- Update phase→"committing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "commit_changes" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"commit_changes"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Git commit: \`git commit -m "fix(${finding.dimension}): ${finding.title} [${finding.id}]"\`
+- Capture commit hash
+
+**After Step**:
+- Update finding: status→"completed", result→"fixed", commit_hash→<captured>, test_passed→true, completed_at→now()
+- Update flow_control: Mark "commit_changes" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+#### After Each Finding
+
+- Update summary: Recalculate counts (pending/in_progress/fixed/failed) and percent_complete
+- If all findings completed: Clear current_finding, reset flow_control
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+### Final Completion
+
+When all findings processed:
+- Update status→"completed", phase→"done", summary.percent_complete→100.0
+- Update last_update→now(), write final state to ${group.progress_file}
+
+## Critical Requirements
+
+### Progress File Updates
+- **MUST update after every significant action** (before/after each step)
+- **Always maintain complete structure** - never write partial updates
+- **Use ISO 8601 timestamps** - e.g., "2025-01-25T14:36:00Z"
+
+### Flow Control Format
+Follow action-planning-agent flow_control.implementation_approach format:
+- step: Identifier (e.g., "analyze_context", "apply_fix")
+- action: Human-readable description
+- status: "pending" | "in-progress" | "completed" | "failed"
+- started_at: ISO 8601 timestamp or null
+- completed_at: ISO 8601 timestamp or null
+
+### Error Handling
+- Capture all errors in errors[] array
+- Never leave progress file in invalid state
+- Always write complete updates, never partial
+- On unrecoverable error: Mark group as failed, preserve state
+
+## Test Patterns
+Use fix_strategy.test_pattern to run affected tests:
+- Pattern: ${group.fix_strategy.test_pattern}
+- Command: Infer from project (npm test, pytest, etc.)
+- Pass Criteria: 100% pass rate required
+  `
+})
+```
+
+
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Planning Failures**:
+- Invalid template → Abort with error message
+- Insufficient findings data → Request complete export
+- Planning timeout → Retry once, then fail gracefully
+
+**Execution Failures**:
+- Agent crash → Mark group as failed, continue with other groups
+- Test command not found → Skip test verification, warn user
+- Git operations fail → Abort with error, preserve state
+
+**Rollback Scenarios**:
+- Test failure after fix → Automatic `git checkout` rollback
+- Max iterations reached → Leave file unchanged, mark as failed
+- Unrecoverable error → Rollback entire group, save checkpoint
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+**Initialization**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "Phase 2: Planning", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "Phase 3: Execution", status: "pending"},
+    {content: "Phase 4: Completion", status: "pending"}
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**During Execution**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "Phase 2: Planning", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "Phase 3: Execution", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "  → Stage 1: Parallel execution (3 groups)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "    • Group G1: Auth validation (2 findings)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "    • Group G2: Query security (3 findings)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "    • Group G3: Config quality (1 finding)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "  → Stage 2: Serial execution (1 group)", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "    • Group G4: Dependent fixes (2 findings)", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "Phase 4: Completion", status: "pending"}
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**Update Rules**:
+- Add stage items dynamically based on fix-plan.json timeline
+- Add group items per stage
+- Mark completed immediately after each group finishes
+- Update parent phase status when all child items complete
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Trust AI Planning**: Planning agent's grouping and execution strategy are based on dependency analysis
+2. **Conservative Approach**: Test verification is mandatory - no fixes kept without passing tests
+3. **Parallel Efficiency**: Default 3 concurrent agents balances speed and resource usage
+4. **Resume Support**: Fix sessions can resume from checkpoints after interruption
+5. **Manual Review**: Always review failed fixes manually - may require architectural changes
+6. **Incremental Fixing**: Start with small batches (5-10 findings) before large-scale fixes
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### View Fix Progress
+Use `ccw view` to open the workflow dashboard in browser:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+

.claude/commands/workflow/review-module-cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,767 @@
+---
+name: review-module-cycle
+description: Independent multi-dimensional code review for specified modules/files. Analyzes specific code paths across 7 dimensions with hybrid parallel-iterative execution, independent of workflow sessions.
+argument-hint: "<path-pattern> [--dimensions=security,architecture,...] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Module-Cycle Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Review specific module (all 7 dimensions)
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**
+
+# Review multiple modules
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**,src/payment/**
+
+# Review with custom dimensions
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/payment/** --dimensions=security,architecture,quality
+
+# Review specific files
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/payment/processor.ts,src/payment/validator.ts
+```
+
+**Review Scope**: Specified modules/files only (independent of git history)
+**Session Requirement**: Auto-creates workflow session via `/workflow:session:start`
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/` (session-based)
+**Default Dimensions**: Security, Architecture, Quality, Action-Items, Performance, Maintainability, Best-Practices
+**Max Iterations**: 3 (adjustable via --max-iterations)
+**Default Iterations**: 1 (deep-dive runs once; use --max-iterations=0 to skip)
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Independent multi-dimensional code review orchestrator with **hybrid parallel-iterative execution** for comprehensive quality assessment of **specific modules or files**.
+
+**Review Scope**:
+- **Module-based**: Reviews specified file patterns (e.g., `src/auth/**`, `*.ts`)
+- **Session-integrated**: Runs within workflow session context for unified tracking
+- **Output location**: `.review/` subdirectory within active session
+
+**vs Session Review**:
+- **Session Review** (`review-session-cycle`): Reviews git changes within a workflow session
+- **Module Review** (`review-module-cycle`): Reviews any specified code paths, regardless of git history
+- **Common output**: Both use same `.review/` directory structure within session
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Module-Focused Review**: Target specific code areas independent of git history
+2. **Session-Integrated**: Review results tracked within workflow session for unified management
+3. **Comprehensive Coverage**: Same 7 specialized dimensions as session review
+4. **Intelligent Prioritization**: Automatic identification of critical issues and cross-cutting concerns
+5. **Unified Archive**: Review results archived with session for historical reference
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for independent multi-dimensional module review
+- Manages: dimension coordination, aggregation, iteration control, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Code exploration and analysis to @cli-explore-agent, dimension-specific reviews via Deep Scan mode
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Resolve file patterns, validate paths, initialize state, create output structure
+
+Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (for each dimension)
+   ├─ Launch 7 review agents simultaneously
+   ├─ Each executes CLI analysis via Gemini/Qwen on specified files
+   ├─ Generate dimension JSON + markdown reports
+   └─ Update review-progress.json
+
+Phase 3: Aggregation
+   ├─ Load all dimension JSON files
+   ├─ Calculate severity distribution (critical/high/medium/low)
+   ├─ Identify cross-cutting concerns (files in 3+ dimensions)
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Critical findings OR high > 5 OR critical files → Phase 4 (Iterate)
+      └─ Else → Phase 5 (Complete)
+
+Phase 4: Iterative Deep-Dive (optional)
+   ├─ Select critical findings (max 5 per iteration)
+   ├─ Launch deep-dive agents for root cause analysis
+   ├─ Generate remediation plans with impact assessment
+   ├─ Re-assess severity based on analysis
+   └─ Loop until no critical findings OR max iterations
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   └─ Finalize review-progress.json
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Phase control, path resolution, state management, aggregation logic, iteration control |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Review) | Execute dimension-specific code analysis via Deep Scan mode, generate findings JSON with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini), create structured analysis reports |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Deep-dive) | Focused root cause analysis using dependency mapping, remediation planning with architectural insights, impact assessment, severity re-assessment |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Review Dimensions Configuration
+
+**7 Specialized Dimensions** with priority-based allocation:
+
+| Dimension | Template | Priority | Timeout |
+|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
+| **Security** | 03-assess-security-risks.txt | 1 (Critical) | 60min |
+| **Architecture** | 02-review-architecture.txt | 2 (High) | 60min |
+| **Quality** | 02-review-code-quality.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Action-Items** | 02-analyze-code-patterns.txt | 2 (High) | 40min |
+| **Performance** | 03-analyze-performance.txt | 3 (Medium) | 60min |
+| **Maintainability** | 02-review-code-quality.txt* | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Best-Practices** | 03-review-quality-standards.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+
+*Custom focus: "Assess technical debt and maintainability"
+
+**Category Definitions by Dimension**:
+
+```javascript
+const CATEGORIES = {
+  security: ['injection', 'authentication', 'authorization', 'encryption', 'input-validation', 'access-control', 'data-exposure'],
+  architecture: ['coupling', 'cohesion', 'layering', 'dependency', 'pattern-violation', 'scalability', 'separation-of-concerns'],
+  quality: ['code-smell', 'duplication', 'complexity', 'naming', 'error-handling', 'testability', 'readability'],
+  'action-items': ['requirement-coverage', 'acceptance-criteria', 'documentation', 'deployment-readiness', 'missing-functionality'],
+  performance: ['n-plus-one', 'inefficient-query', 'memory-leak', 'blocking-operation', 'caching', 'resource-usage'],
+  maintainability: ['technical-debt', 'magic-number', 'long-method', 'large-class', 'dead-code', 'commented-code'],
+  'best-practices': ['convention-violation', 'anti-pattern', 'deprecated-api', 'missing-validation', 'inconsistent-style']
+};
+```
+
+### 2. Path Pattern Resolution
+
+**Syntax Rules**:
+- All paths are **relative** from project root (e.g., `src/auth/**` not `/src/auth/**`)
+- Multiple patterns: comma-separated, **no spaces** (e.g., `src/auth/**,src/payment/**`)
+- Glob and specific files can be mixed (e.g., `src/auth/**,src/config.ts`)
+
+**Supported Patterns**:
+| Pattern Type | Example | Description |
+|--------------|---------|-------------|
+| Glob directory | `src/auth/**` | All files under src/auth/ |
+| Glob with extension | `src/**/*.ts` | All .ts files under src/ |
+| Specific file | `src/payment/processor.ts` | Single file |
+| Multiple patterns | `src/auth/**,src/payment/**` | Comma-separated (no spaces) |
+
+**Resolution Process**:
+1. Parse input pattern (split by comma, trim whitespace)
+2. Expand glob patterns to file list via `find` command
+3. Validate all files exist and are readable
+4. Error if pattern matches 0 files
+5. Store resolved file list in review-state.json
+
+### 3. Aggregation Logic
+
+**Cross-Cutting Concern Detection**:
+1. Files appearing in 3+ dimensions = **Critical Files**
+2. Same issue pattern across dimensions = **Systemic Issue**
+3. Severity clustering in specific files = **Hotspots**
+
+**Deep-Dive Selection Criteria**:
+- All critical severity findings (priority 1)
+- Top 3 high-severity findings in critical files (priority 2)
+- Max 5 findings per iteration (prevent overwhelm)
+
+### 4. Severity Assessment
+
+**Severity Levels**:
+- **Critical**: Security vulnerabilities, data corruption risks, system-wide failures, authentication/authorization bypass
+- **High**: Feature degradation, performance bottlenecks, architecture violations, significant technical debt
+- **Medium**: Code smells, minor performance issues, style inconsistencies, maintainability concerns
+- **Low**: Documentation gaps, minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic issues
+
+**Iteration Trigger**:
+- Critical findings > 0 OR
+- High findings > 5 OR
+- Critical files count > 0
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+
+**Step 1: Session Creation**
+```javascript
+// Create workflow session for this review (type: review)
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type review \"Code review for [target_pattern]\"")
+
+// Parse output
+const sessionId = output.match(/SESSION_ID: (WFS-[^\s]+)/)[1];
+```
+
+**Step 2: Path Resolution & Validation**
+```bash
+# Expand glob pattern to file list (relative paths from project root)
+find . -path "./src/auth/**" -type f | sed 's|^\./||'
+
+# Validate files exist and are readable
+for file in ${resolvedFiles[@]}; do
+  test -r "$file" || error "File not readable: $file"
+done
+```
+- Parse and expand file patterns (glob support): `src/auth/**` → actual file list
+- Validation: Ensure all specified files exist and are readable
+- Store as **relative paths** from project root (e.g., `src/auth/service.ts`)
+- Agents construct absolute paths dynamically during execution
+
+**Step 3: Output Directory Setup**
+- Output directory: `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.review/`
+- Create directory structure:
+  ```bash
+  mkdir -p ${sessionDir}/.review/{dimensions,iterations,reports}
+  ```
+
+**Step 4: Initialize Review State**
+- State initialization: Create `review-state.json` with metadata, dimensions, max_iterations, resolved_files (merged metadata + state)
+- Progress tracking: Create `review-progress.json` for progress tracking
+
+**Step 5: TodoWrite Initialization**
+- Set up progress tracking with hierarchical structure
+- Mark Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Phase 2: Parallel Review Coordination**
+- Launch 7 @cli-explore-agent instances simultaneously (Deep Scan mode)
+- Pass dimension-specific context (template, timeout, custom focus, **target files**)
+- Monitor completion via review-progress.json updates
+- TodoWrite updates: Mark dimensions as completed
+- CLI tool fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (on error/timeout)
+
+**Phase 3: Aggregation**
+- Load all dimension JSON files from dimensions/
+- Calculate severity distribution: Count by critical/high/medium/low
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns: Files in 3+ dimensions
+- Select deep-dive findings: Critical + high in critical files (max 5)
+- Decision logic: Iterate if critical > 0 OR high > 5 OR critical files exist
+- Update review-state.json with aggregation results
+
+**Phase 4: Iteration Control**
+- Check iteration count < max_iterations (default 3)
+- Launch deep-dive agents for selected findings
+- Collect remediation plans and re-assessed severities
+- Update severity distribution based on re-assessments
+- Record iteration in review-state.json
+- Loop back to aggregation if still have critical/high findings
+
+**Phase 5: Completion**
+- Finalize review-progress.json with completion statistics
+- Update review-state.json with completion_time and phase=complete
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all tasks done
+
+
+
+### Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── review-state.json                    # Orchestrator state machine (includes metadata)
+├── review-progress.json                 # Real-time progress for dashboard
+├── dimensions/                          # Per-dimension results
+│   ├── security.json
+│   ├── architecture.json
+│   ├── quality.json
+│   ├── action-items.json
+│   ├── performance.json
+│   ├── maintainability.json
+│   └── best-practices.json
+├── iterations/                          # Deep-dive results
+│   ├── iteration-1-finding-{uuid}.json
+│   └── iteration-2-finding-{uuid}.json
+└── reports/                             # Human-readable reports
+    ├── security-analysis.md
+    ├── security-cli-output.txt
+    ├── deep-dive-1-{uuid}.md
+    └── ...
+```
+
+**Session Context**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+├── .summaries/
+└── .review/                             # Review results (this command)
+    └── (structure above)
+```
+
+### Review State JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Unified state machine and metadata (merged from metadata + state)
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "review_type": "module",
+  "session_id": "WFS-auth-system",
+  "metadata": {
+    "created_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
+    "target_pattern": "src/auth/**",
+    "resolved_files": [
+      "src/auth/service.ts",
+      "src/auth/validator.ts",
+      "src/auth/middleware.ts"
+    ],
+    "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+    "max_iterations": 3
+  },
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "dimensions_reviewed": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+  "selected_strategy": "comprehensive",
+  "next_action": "execute_parallel_reviews|aggregate_findings|execute_deep_dive|generate_final_report|complete",
+  "severity_distribution": {
+    "critical": 2,
+    "high": 5,
+    "medium": 12,
+    "low": 8
+  },
+  "critical_files": [...],
+  "iterations": [...],
+  "completion_criteria": {...}
+}
+```
+
+### Review Progress JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Real-time dashboard updates via polling
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "last_update": "2025-01-25T14:35:10Z",
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "progress": {
+    "parallel_review": {
+      "total_dimensions": 7,
+      "completed": 5,
+      "in_progress": 2,
+      "percent_complete": 71
+    },
+    "deep_dive": {
+      "total_findings": 6,
+      "analyzed": 2,
+      "in_progress": 1,
+      "percent_complete": 33
+    }
+  },
+  "agent_status": [
+    {
+      "agent_type": "review-agent",
+      "dimension": "security",
+      "status": "completed",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-01-25T15:15:00Z",
+      "duration_ms": 2700000
+    },
+    {
+      "agent_type": "deep-dive-agent",
+      "finding_id": "sec-001-uuid",
+      "status": "in_progress",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:32:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "estimated_completion": "2025-01-25T16:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+### Agent Output Schemas
+
+**Agent-produced JSON files follow standardized schemas**:
+
+1. **Dimension Results** (cli-explore-agent output from parallel reviews)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `{output-dir}/dimensions/{dimension}.json`
+   - Contains: findings array, summary statistics, cross_references
+
+2. **Deep-Dive Results** (cli-explore-agent output from iterations)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `{output-dir}/iterations/iteration-{N}-finding-{uuid}.json`
+   - Contains: root_cause, remediation_plan, impact_assessment, reassessed_severity
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Review Agent** (parallel execution, 7 instances):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Execute ${dimension} review analysis via Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Conduct comprehensive ${dimension} code exploration and analysis using Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source strategy) for specified module files
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Deep Scan mode** for this review:
+    - Phase 1: Bash structural scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
+    - Phase 2: Gemini semantic analysis for design intent, non-standard patterns, ${dimension}-specific concerns
+    - Phase 3: Synthesis with attribution (bash-discovered vs gemini-discovered findings)
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read review state: ${reviewStateJsonPath}
+    2. Get target files: Read resolved_files from review-state.json
+    3. Validate file access: bash(ls -la ${targetFiles.join(' ')})
+    4. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+    ## Review Context
+    - Review Type: module (independent)
+    - Review Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Review ID: ${reviewId}
+    - Target Pattern: ${targetPattern}
+    - Resolved Files: ${resolvedFiles.length} files
+    - Output Directory: ${outputDir}
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex (fallback chain)
+    - Custom Focus: ${customFocus || 'Standard dimension analysis'}
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+    - Context Pattern: ${targetFiles.map(f => `@${f}`).join(' ')}
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 4, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Dimension Results JSON: ${outputDir}/dimensions/${dimension}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - dimension, review_id, analysis_timestamp (NOT timestamp/analyzed_at)
+       - cli_tool_used (gemini|qwen|codex), model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - summary (FLAT structure), findings, cross_references
+
+       Summary MUST be FLAT (NOT nested by_severity):
+       \`{ "total_findings": N, "critical": N, "high": N, "medium": N, "low": N, "files_analyzed": N, "lines_reviewed": N }\`
+
+       Finding required fields:
+       - id: format \`{dim}-{seq}-{uuid8}\` e.g., \`sec-001-a1b2c3d4\` (lowercase)
+       - severity: lowercase only (critical|high|medium|low)
+       - snippet (NOT code_snippet), impact (NOT exploit_scenario)
+       - metadata, iteration (0), status (pending_remediation), cross_references
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-analysis.md
+       - Human-readable summary with recommendations
+       - Grouped by severity: critical → high → medium → low
+       - Include file:line references for all findings
+
+    3. CLI Output Log: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-cli-output.txt
+       - Raw CLI tool output for debugging
+       - Include full analysis text
+
+    ## Dimension-Specific Guidance
+    ${getDimensionGuidance(dimension)}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-dimension-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] All target files analyzed for ${dimension} concerns
+    - [ ] All findings include file:line references with code snippets
+    - [ ] Severity assessment follows established criteria (see reference)
+    - [ ] Recommendations are actionable with code examples
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] Report is comprehensive and well-organized
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Deep-Dive Agent** (iteration execution):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Deep-dive analysis for critical finding: ${findingTitle} via Dependency Map + Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Perform focused root cause analysis using Dependency Map mode (for impact analysis) + Deep Scan mode (for semantic understanding) to generate comprehensive remediation plan for critical ${dimension} issue
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Dependency Map mode** first to understand dependencies:
+    - Build dependency graph around ${file} to identify affected components
+    - Detect circular dependencies or tight coupling related to this finding
+    - Calculate change risk scores for remediation impact
+
+    Then apply **Deep Scan mode** for semantic analysis:
+    - Understand design intent and architectural context
+    - Identify non-standard patterns or implicit dependencies
+    - Extract remediation insights from code structure
+
+    ## Finding Context
+    - Finding ID: ${findingId}
+    - Original Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Title: ${findingTitle}
+    - File: ${file}:${line}
+    - Severity: ${severity}
+    - Category: ${category}
+    - Original Description: ${description}
+    - Iteration: ${iteration}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read original finding: ${dimensionJsonPath}
+    2. Read affected file: ${file}
+    3. Identify related code: bash(grep -r "import.*${basename(file)}" ${projectDir}/src --include="*.ts")
+    4. Read test files: bash(find ${projectDir}/tests -name "*${basename(file, '.ts')}*" -type f)
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Deep-Dive Results JSON: ${outputDir}/iterations/iteration-${iteration}-finding-${findingId}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - finding_id, dimension, iteration, analysis_timestamp
+       - cli_tool_used, model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - original_finding, root_cause, remediation_plan
+       - impact_assessment, reassessed_severity, confidence_score, cross_references
+
+       All nested objects must follow schema exactly - read schema for field names
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/deep-dive-${iteration}-${findingId}.md
+       - Detailed root cause analysis
+       - Step-by-step remediation plan
+       - Impact assessment and rollback strategy
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-deep-dive-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] Root cause clearly identified with supporting evidence
+    - [ ] Remediation plan is step-by-step actionable with exact file:line references
+    - [ ] Each step includes specific commands and validation tests
+    - [ ] Impact fully assessed (files, tests, breaking changes, dependencies)
+    - [ ] Severity re-evaluation justified with evidence
+    - [ ] Confidence score accurately reflects certainty of analysis
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] References include project-specific and external documentation
+  `
+)
+```
+
+### Dimension Guidance Reference
+
+```javascript
+function getDimensionGuidance(dimension) {
+  const guidance = {
+    security: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Input validation and sanitization
+      - Authentication and authorization mechanisms
+      - Data encryption (at-rest and in-transit)
+      - SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
+      - XSS, CSRF, and other web vulnerabilities
+      - Sensitive data exposure
+      - Access control and privilege escalation
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Authentication bypass, SQL injection, RCE, sensitive data exposure
+      - High: Missing authorization checks, weak encryption, exposed secrets
+      - Medium: Missing input validation, insecure defaults, weak password policies
+      - Low: Security headers missing, verbose error messages, outdated dependencies
+    `,
+    architecture: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Layering and separation of concerns
+      - Coupling and cohesion
+      - Design pattern adherence
+      - Dependency management
+      - Scalability and extensibility
+      - Module boundaries
+      - API design consistency
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Circular dependencies, god objects, tight coupling across layers
+      - High: Violated architectural principles, scalability bottlenecks
+      - Medium: Missing abstractions, inconsistent patterns, suboptimal design
+      - Low: Minor coupling issues, documentation gaps, naming inconsistencies
+    `,
+    quality: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Code duplication
+      - Complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
+      - Naming conventions
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Code readability
+      - Comment quality
+      - Dead code
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe complexity (CC > 20), massive duplication (>50 lines)
+      - High: High complexity (CC > 10), significant duplication, poor error handling
+      - Medium: Moderate complexity (CC > 5), naming issues, code smells
+      - Low: Minor duplication, documentation gaps, cosmetic issues
+    `,
+    'action-items': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Requirements coverage verification
+      - Acceptance criteria met
+      - Documentation completeness
+      - Deployment readiness
+      - Missing functionality
+      - Test coverage gaps
+      - Configuration management
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Core requirements not met, deployment blockers
+      - High: Significant functionality missing, acceptance criteria not met
+      - Medium: Minor requirements gaps, documentation incomplete
+      - Low: Nice-to-have features missing, minor documentation gaps
+    `,
+    performance: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - N+1 query problems
+      - Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n log n) possible)
+      - Memory leaks
+      - Blocking operations on main thread
+      - Missing caching opportunities
+      - Resource usage (CPU, memory, network)
+      - Database query optimization
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Memory leaks, O(n²) in hot path, blocking main thread
+      - High: N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms
+      - Medium: Suboptimal caching, unnecessary computations, lazy loading issues
+      - Low: Minor optimization opportunities, redundant operations
+    `,
+    maintainability: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Technical debt indicators
+      - Magic numbers and hardcoded values
+      - Long methods (>50 lines)
+      - Large classes (>500 lines)
+      - Dead code and commented code
+      - Code documentation
+      - Test coverage
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Massive methods (>200 lines), severe technical debt blocking changes
+      - High: Large methods (>100 lines), significant dead code, undocumented complex logic
+      - Medium: Magic numbers, moderate technical debt, missing tests
+      - Low: Minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic improvements
+    `,
+    'best-practices': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Framework conventions adherence
+      - Language idioms
+      - Anti-patterns
+      - Deprecated API usage
+      - Coding standards compliance
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Logging and monitoring
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe anti-patterns, deprecated APIs with security risks
+      - High: Major convention violations, poor error handling, missing logging
+      - Medium: Minor anti-patterns, style inconsistencies, suboptimal patterns
+      - Low: Cosmetic style issues, minor convention deviations
+    `
+  };
+
+  return guidance[dimension] || 'Standard code review analysis';
+}
+```
+
+### Completion Conditions
+
+**Full Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Critical findings = 0
+- High findings ≤ 5
+- Action: Generate final report, mark phase=complete
+
+**Partial Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Max iterations reached
+- Still have critical/high findings
+- Action: Generate report with warnings, recommend follow-up
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase-Level Error Matrix**:
+
+| Phase | Error | Blocking? | Action |
+|-------|-------|-----------|--------|
+| Phase 1 | Invalid path pattern | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No files matched | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | Files not readable | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 2 | Single dimension fails | No | Log warning, continue other dimensions |
+| Phase 2 | All dimensions fail | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 3 | Missing dimension JSON | No | Skip in aggregation, log warning |
+| Phase 4 | Deep-dive agent fails | No | Skip finding, continue others |
+| Phase 4 | Max iterations reached | No | Generate partial report |
+
+**CLI Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → degraded mode
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+1. HTTP 429, 5xx errors, connection timeout
+2. Invalid JSON output (parse error, missing required fields)
+3. Low confidence score < 0.4
+4. Analysis too brief (< 100 words in report)
+
+**Fallback Behavior**:
+- On trigger: Retry with next tool in chain
+- After Codex fails: Enter degraded mode (skip analysis, log error)
+- Degraded mode: Continue workflow with available results
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing" },
+    { content: "Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (7 dimensions)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Reviewing" },
+    { content: "  → Security review", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Analyzing security" },
+    // ... other dimensions as sub-items
+    { content: "Phase 3: Aggregation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Aggregating" },
+    { content: "Phase 4: Deep-dive", status: "pending", activeForm: "Deep-diving" },
+    { content: "Phase 5: Completion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Completing" }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Start Specific**: Begin with focused module patterns for faster results
+2. **Expand Gradually**: Add more modules based on initial findings
+3. **Use Glob Wisely**: `src/auth/**` is more efficient than `src/**` with lots of irrelevant files
+4. **Trust Aggregation Logic**: Auto-selection based on proven heuristics
+5. **Monitor Logs**: Check reports/ directory for CLI analysis insights
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### View Review Progress
+Use `ccw view` to open the review dashboard in browser:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+### Automated Fix Workflow
+After completing a module review, use the generated findings JSON for automated fixing:
+
+```bash
+# Step 1: Complete review (this command)
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**
+
+# Step 2: Run automated fixes using dimension findings
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+```
+
+See `/workflow:review-fix` for automated fixing with smart grouping, parallel execution, and test verification.
+

.claude/commands/workflow/review-session-cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,778 @@
+---
+name: review-session-cycle
+description: Session-based comprehensive multi-dimensional code review. Analyzes git changes from workflow session across 7 dimensions with hybrid parallel-iterative execution, aggregates findings, and performs focused deep-dives on critical issues until quality gates met.
+argument-hint: "[session-id] [--dimensions=security,architecture,...] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Session-Cycle Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Execute comprehensive session review (all 7 dimensions)
+/workflow:review-session-cycle
+
+# Review specific session with custom dimensions
+/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-payment-integration --dimensions=security,architecture,quality
+
+# Specify session and iteration limit
+/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-payment-integration --max-iterations=5
+```
+
+**Review Scope**: Git changes from session creation to present (via `git log --since`)
+**Session Requirement**: Requires active or completed workflow session
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/` (session-based)
+**Default Dimensions**: Security, Architecture, Quality, Action-Items, Performance, Maintainability, Best-Practices
+**Max Iterations**: 3 (adjustable via --max-iterations)
+**Default Iterations**: 1 (deep-dive runs once; use --max-iterations=0 to skip)
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Session-based multi-dimensional code review orchestrator with **hybrid parallel-iterative execution** for comprehensive quality assessment of **git changes within a workflow session**.
+
+**Review Scope**:
+- **Session-based**: Reviews only files changed during the workflow session (via `git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}"`)
+- **For independent module review**: Use `/workflow:review-module-cycle` command instead
+
+**vs Standard Review**:
+- **Standard**: Sequential manual reviews → Inconsistent coverage → Missed cross-cutting concerns
+- **Review-Session-Cycle**: **Parallel automated analysis → Aggregate findings → Deep-dive critical issues** → Comprehensive coverage
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Comprehensive Coverage**: 7 specialized dimensions analyze all quality aspects simultaneously
+2. **Intelligent Prioritization**: Automatic identification of critical issues and cross-cutting concerns
+3. **Actionable Insights**: Deep-dive iterations provide step-by-step remediation plans
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for comprehensive multi-dimensional review
+- Manages: dimension coordination, aggregation, iteration control, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Code exploration and analysis to @cli-explore-agent, dimension-specific reviews via Deep Scan mode
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow (Simplified)
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Validate session, initialize state, create output structure
+
+Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (for each dimension)
+   ├─ Launch 7 review agents simultaneously
+   ├─ Each executes CLI analysis via Gemini/Qwen
+   ├─ Generate dimension JSON + markdown reports
+   └─ Update review-progress.json
+
+Phase 3: Aggregation
+   ├─ Load all dimension JSON files
+   ├─ Calculate severity distribution (critical/high/medium/low)
+   ├─ Identify cross-cutting concerns (files in 3+ dimensions)
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Critical findings OR high > 5 OR critical files → Phase 4 (Iterate)
+      └─ Else → Phase 5 (Complete)
+
+Phase 4: Iterative Deep-Dive (optional)
+   ├─ Select critical findings (max 5 per iteration)
+   ├─ Launch deep-dive agents for root cause analysis
+   ├─ Generate remediation plans with impact assessment
+   ├─ Re-assess severity based on analysis
+   └─ Loop until no critical findings OR max iterations
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   └─ Finalize review-progress.json
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Phase control, session discovery, state management, aggregation logic, iteration control |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Review) | Execute dimension-specific code analysis via Deep Scan mode, generate findings JSON with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini), create structured analysis reports |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Deep-dive) | Focused root cause analysis using dependency mapping, remediation planning with architectural insights, impact assessment, severity re-assessment |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Review Dimensions Configuration
+
+**7 Specialized Dimensions** with priority-based allocation:
+
+| Dimension | Template | Priority | Timeout |
+|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
+| **Security** | 03-assess-security-risks.txt | 1 (Critical) | 60min |
+| **Architecture** | 02-review-architecture.txt | 2 (High) | 60min |
+| **Quality** | 02-review-code-quality.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Action-Items** | 02-analyze-code-patterns.txt | 2 (High) | 40min |
+| **Performance** | 03-analyze-performance.txt | 3 (Medium) | 60min |
+| **Maintainability** | 02-review-code-quality.txt* | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Best-Practices** | 03-review-quality-standards.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+
+*Custom focus: "Assess technical debt and maintainability"
+
+**Category Definitions by Dimension**:
+
+```javascript
+const CATEGORIES = {
+  security: ['injection', 'authentication', 'authorization', 'encryption', 'input-validation', 'access-control', 'data-exposure'],
+  architecture: ['coupling', 'cohesion', 'layering', 'dependency', 'pattern-violation', 'scalability', 'separation-of-concerns'],
+  quality: ['code-smell', 'duplication', 'complexity', 'naming', 'error-handling', 'testability', 'readability'],
+  'action-items': ['requirement-coverage', 'acceptance-criteria', 'documentation', 'deployment-readiness', 'missing-functionality'],
+  performance: ['n-plus-one', 'inefficient-query', 'memory-leak', 'blocking-operation', 'caching', 'resource-usage'],
+  maintainability: ['technical-debt', 'magic-number', 'long-method', 'large-class', 'dead-code', 'commented-code'],
+  'best-practices': ['convention-violation', 'anti-pattern', 'deprecated-api', 'missing-validation', 'inconsistent-style']
+};
+```
+
+### 2. Aggregation Logic
+
+**Cross-Cutting Concern Detection**:
+1. Files appearing in 3+ dimensions = **Critical Files**
+2. Same issue pattern across dimensions = **Systemic Issue**
+3. Severity clustering in specific files = **Hotspots**
+
+**Deep-Dive Selection Criteria**:
+- All critical severity findings (priority 1)
+- Top 3 high-severity findings in critical files (priority 2)
+- Max 5 findings per iteration (prevent overwhelm)
+
+### 3. Severity Assessment
+
+**Severity Levels**:
+- **Critical**: Security vulnerabilities, data corruption risks, system-wide failures, authentication/authorization bypass
+- **High**: Feature degradation, performance bottlenecks, architecture violations, significant technical debt
+- **Medium**: Code smells, minor performance issues, style inconsistencies, maintainability concerns
+- **Low**: Documentation gaps, minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic issues
+
+**Iteration Trigger**:
+- Critical findings > 0 OR
+- High findings > 5 OR
+- Critical files count > 0
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+
+**Step 1: Session Discovery**
+```javascript
+// If session ID not provided, auto-detect
+if (!providedSessionId) {
+  // Check for active sessions
+  const activeSessions = Glob('.workflow/active/WFS-*');
+  if (activeSessions.length === 1) {
+    sessionId = activeSessions[0].match(/WFS-[^/]+/)[0];
+  } else if (activeSessions.length > 1) {
+    // List sessions and prompt user
+    error("Multiple active sessions found. Please specify session ID.");
+  } else {
+    error("No active session found. Create session first with /workflow:session:start");
+  }
+} else {
+  sessionId = providedSessionId;
+}
+
+// Validate session exists
+Bash(`test -d .workflow/active/${sessionId} && echo "EXISTS"`);
+```
+
+**Step 2: Session Validation**
+- Ensure session has implementation artifacts (check `.summaries/` or `.task/` directory)
+- Extract session creation timestamp from `workflow-session.json`
+- Use timestamp for git log filtering: `git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}"`
+
+**Step 3: Changed Files Detection**
+```bash
+# Get files changed since session creation
+git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+```
+
+**Step 4: Output Directory Setup**
+- Output directory: `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.review/`
+- Create directory structure:
+  ```bash
+  mkdir -p ${sessionDir}/.review/{dimensions,iterations,reports}
+  ```
+
+**Step 5: Initialize Review State**
+- State initialization: Create `review-state.json` with metadata, dimensions, max_iterations (merged metadata + state)
+- Progress tracking: Create `review-progress.json` for progress tracking
+
+**Step 6: TodoWrite Initialization**
+- Set up progress tracking with hierarchical structure
+- Mark Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Phase 2: Parallel Review Coordination**
+- Launch 7 @cli-explore-agent instances simultaneously (Deep Scan mode)
+- Pass dimension-specific context (template, timeout, custom focus)
+- Monitor completion via review-progress.json updates
+- TodoWrite updates: Mark dimensions as completed
+- CLI tool fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (on error/timeout)
+
+**Phase 3: Aggregation**
+- Load all dimension JSON files from dimensions/
+- Calculate severity distribution: Count by critical/high/medium/low
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns: Files in 3+ dimensions
+- Select deep-dive findings: Critical + high in critical files (max 5)
+- Decision logic: Iterate if critical > 0 OR high > 5 OR critical files exist
+- Update review-state.json with aggregation results
+
+**Phase 4: Iteration Control**
+- Check iteration count < max_iterations (default 3)
+- Launch deep-dive agents for selected findings
+- Collect remediation plans and re-assessed severities
+- Update severity distribution based on re-assessments
+- Record iteration in review-state.json
+- Loop back to aggregation if still have critical/high findings
+
+**Phase 5: Completion**
+- Finalize review-progress.json with completion statistics
+- Update review-state.json with completion_time and phase=complete
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all tasks done
+
+
+
+### Session File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── review-state.json                    # Orchestrator state machine (includes metadata)
+├── review-progress.json                 # Real-time progress for dashboard
+├── dimensions/                          # Per-dimension results
+│   ├── security.json
+│   ├── architecture.json
+│   ├── quality.json
+│   ├── action-items.json
+│   ├── performance.json
+│   ├── maintainability.json
+│   └── best-practices.json
+├── iterations/                          # Deep-dive results
+│   ├── iteration-1-finding-{uuid}.json
+│   └── iteration-2-finding-{uuid}.json
+└── reports/                             # Human-readable reports
+    ├── security-analysis.md
+    ├── security-cli-output.txt
+    ├── deep-dive-1-{uuid}.md
+    └── ...
+```
+
+**Session Context**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+├── .summaries/
+└── .review/                             # Review results (this command)
+    └── (structure above)
+```
+
+### Review State JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Unified state machine and metadata (merged from metadata + state)
+
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-payment-integration",
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "review_type": "session",
+  "metadata": {
+    "created_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
+    "git_changes": {
+      "commit_range": "abc123..def456",
+      "files_changed": 15,
+      "insertions": 342,
+      "deletions": 128
+    },
+    "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+    "max_iterations": 3
+  },
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "dimensions_reviewed": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+  "selected_strategy": "comprehensive",
+  "next_action": "execute_parallel_reviews|aggregate_findings|execute_deep_dive|generate_final_report|complete",
+  "severity_distribution": {
+    "critical": 2,
+    "high": 5,
+    "medium": 12,
+    "low": 8
+  },
+  "critical_files": [
+    {
+      "file": "src/payment/processor.ts",
+      "finding_count": 5,
+      "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality"]
+    }
+  ],
+  "iterations": [
+    {
+      "iteration": 1,
+      "findings_analyzed": ["uuid-1", "uuid-2"],
+      "findings_resolved": 1,
+      "findings_escalated": 1,
+      "severity_change": {
+        "before": {"critical": 2, "high": 5, "medium": 12, "low": 8},
+        "after": {"critical": 1, "high": 6, "medium": 12, "low": 8}
+      },
+      "timestamp": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "completion_criteria": {
+    "target": "no_critical_findings_and_high_under_5",
+    "current_status": "in_progress",
+    "estimated_completion": "2 iterations remaining"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Field Descriptions**:
+- `phase`: Current execution phase (state machine pointer)
+- `current_iteration`: Iteration counter (used for max check)
+- `next_action`: Next step orchestrator should execute
+- `severity_distribution`: Aggregated counts across all dimensions
+- `critical_files`: Files appearing in 3+ dimensions with metadata
+- `iterations[]`: Historical log for trend analysis
+
+### Review Progress JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Real-time dashboard updates via polling
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "last_update": "2025-01-25T14:35:10Z",
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "progress": {
+    "parallel_review": {
+      "total_dimensions": 7,
+      "completed": 5,
+      "in_progress": 2,
+      "percent_complete": 71
+    },
+    "deep_dive": {
+      "total_findings": 6,
+      "analyzed": 2,
+      "in_progress": 1,
+      "percent_complete": 33
+    }
+  },
+  "agent_status": [
+    {
+      "agent_type": "review-agent",
+      "dimension": "security",
+      "status": "completed",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-01-25T15:15:00Z",
+      "duration_ms": 2700000
+    },
+    {
+      "agent_type": "deep-dive-agent",
+      "finding_id": "sec-001-uuid",
+      "status": "in_progress",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:32:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "estimated_completion": "2025-01-25T16:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+### Agent Output Schemas
+
+**Agent-produced JSON files follow standardized schemas**:
+
+1. **Dimension Results** (cli-explore-agent output from parallel reviews)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `.review-cycle/dimensions/{dimension}.json`
+   - Contains: findings array, summary statistics, cross_references
+
+2. **Deep-Dive Results** (cli-explore-agent output from iterations)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `.review-cycle/iterations/iteration-{N}-finding-{uuid}.json`
+   - Contains: root_cause, remediation_plan, impact_assessment, reassessed_severity
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Review Agent** (parallel execution, 7 instances):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Execute ${dimension} review analysis via Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Conduct comprehensive ${dimension} code exploration and analysis using Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source strategy) for completed implementation in session ${sessionId}
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Deep Scan mode** for this review:
+    - Phase 1: Bash structural scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
+    - Phase 2: Gemini semantic analysis for design intent, non-standard patterns, ${dimension}-specific concerns
+    - Phase 3: Synthesis with attribution (bash-discovered vs gemini-discovered findings)
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read session metadata: ${sessionMetadataPath}
+    2. Read completed task summaries: bash(find ${summariesDir} -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f)
+    3. Get changed files: bash(cd ${workflowDir} && git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u)
+    4. Read review state: ${reviewStateJsonPath}
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+    ## Session Context
+    - Session ID: ${sessionId}
+    - Review Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Review ID: ${reviewId}
+    - Implementation Phase: Complete (all tests passing)
+    - Output Directory: ${outputDir}
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex (fallback chain)
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/${dimensionTemplate}
+    - Custom Focus: ${customFocus || 'Standard dimension analysis'}
+    - Timeout: ${timeout}ms
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Dimension Results JSON: ${outputDir}/dimensions/${dimension}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - dimension, review_id, analysis_timestamp (NOT timestamp/analyzed_at)
+       - cli_tool_used (gemini|qwen|codex), model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - summary (FLAT structure), findings, cross_references
+
+       Summary MUST be FLAT (NOT nested by_severity):
+       \`{ "total_findings": N, "critical": N, "high": N, "medium": N, "low": N, "files_analyzed": N, "lines_reviewed": N }\`
+
+       Finding required fields:
+       - id: format \`{dim}-{seq}-{uuid8}\` e.g., \`sec-001-a1b2c3d4\` (lowercase)
+       - severity: lowercase only (critical|high|medium|low)
+       - snippet (NOT code_snippet), impact (NOT exploit_scenario)
+       - metadata, iteration (0), status (pending_remediation), cross_references
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-analysis.md
+       - Human-readable summary with recommendations
+       - Grouped by severity: critical → high → medium → low
+       - Include file:line references for all findings
+
+    3. CLI Output Log: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-cli-output.txt
+       - Raw CLI tool output for debugging
+       - Include full analysis text
+
+    ## Dimension-Specific Guidance
+    ${getDimensionGuidance(dimension)}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-dimension-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] All changed files analyzed for ${dimension} concerns
+    - [ ] All findings include file:line references with code snippets
+    - [ ] Severity assessment follows established criteria (see reference)
+    - [ ] Recommendations are actionable with code examples
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] Report is comprehensive and well-organized
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Deep-Dive Agent** (iteration execution):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Deep-dive analysis for critical finding: ${findingTitle} via Dependency Map + Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Perform focused root cause analysis using Dependency Map mode (for impact analysis) + Deep Scan mode (for semantic understanding) to generate comprehensive remediation plan for critical ${dimension} issue
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Dependency Map mode** first to understand dependencies:
+    - Build dependency graph around ${file} to identify affected components
+    - Detect circular dependencies or tight coupling related to this finding
+    - Calculate change risk scores for remediation impact
+
+    Then apply **Deep Scan mode** for semantic analysis:
+    - Understand design intent and architectural context
+    - Identify non-standard patterns or implicit dependencies
+    - Extract remediation insights from code structure
+
+    ## Finding Context
+    - Finding ID: ${findingId}
+    - Original Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Title: ${findingTitle}
+    - File: ${file}:${line}
+    - Severity: ${severity}
+    - Category: ${category}
+    - Original Description: ${description}
+    - Iteration: ${iteration}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read original finding: ${dimensionJsonPath}
+    2. Read affected file: ${file}
+    3. Identify related code: bash(grep -r "import.*${basename(file)}" ${workflowDir}/src --include="*.ts")
+    4. Read test files: bash(find ${workflowDir}/tests -name "*${basename(file, '.ts')}*" -type f)
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+    - Timeout: 2400000ms (40 minutes)
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Deep-Dive Results JSON: ${outputDir}/iterations/iteration-${iteration}-finding-${findingId}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - finding_id, dimension, iteration, analysis_timestamp
+       - cli_tool_used, model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - original_finding, root_cause, remediation_plan
+       - impact_assessment, reassessed_severity, confidence_score, cross_references
+
+       All nested objects must follow schema exactly - read schema for field names
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/deep-dive-${iteration}-${findingId}.md
+       - Detailed root cause analysis
+       - Step-by-step remediation plan
+       - Impact assessment and rollback strategy
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-deep-dive-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] Root cause clearly identified with supporting evidence
+    - [ ] Remediation plan is step-by-step actionable with exact file:line references
+    - [ ] Each step includes specific commands and validation tests
+    - [ ] Impact fully assessed (files, tests, breaking changes, dependencies)
+    - [ ] Severity re-evaluation justified with evidence
+    - [ ] Confidence score accurately reflects certainty of analysis
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] References include project-specific and external documentation
+  `
+)
+```
+
+### Dimension Guidance Reference
+
+```javascript
+function getDimensionGuidance(dimension) {
+  const guidance = {
+    security: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Input validation and sanitization
+      - Authentication and authorization mechanisms
+      - Data encryption (at-rest and in-transit)
+      - SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
+      - XSS, CSRF, and other web vulnerabilities
+      - Sensitive data exposure
+      - Access control and privilege escalation
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Authentication bypass, SQL injection, RCE, sensitive data exposure
+      - High: Missing authorization checks, weak encryption, exposed secrets
+      - Medium: Missing input validation, insecure defaults, weak password policies
+      - Low: Security headers missing, verbose error messages, outdated dependencies
+    `,
+    architecture: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Layering and separation of concerns
+      - Coupling and cohesion
+      - Design pattern adherence
+      - Dependency management
+      - Scalability and extensibility
+      - Module boundaries
+      - API design consistency
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Circular dependencies, god objects, tight coupling across layers
+      - High: Violated architectural principles, scalability bottlenecks
+      - Medium: Missing abstractions, inconsistent patterns, suboptimal design
+      - Low: Minor coupling issues, documentation gaps, naming inconsistencies
+    `,
+    quality: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Code duplication
+      - Complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
+      - Naming conventions
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Code readability
+      - Comment quality
+      - Dead code
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe complexity (CC > 20), massive duplication (>50 lines)
+      - High: High complexity (CC > 10), significant duplication, poor error handling
+      - Medium: Moderate complexity (CC > 5), naming issues, code smells
+      - Low: Minor duplication, documentation gaps, cosmetic issues
+    `,
+    'action-items': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Requirements coverage verification
+      - Acceptance criteria met
+      - Documentation completeness
+      - Deployment readiness
+      - Missing functionality
+      - Test coverage gaps
+      - Configuration management
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Core requirements not met, deployment blockers
+      - High: Significant functionality missing, acceptance criteria not met
+      - Medium: Minor requirements gaps, documentation incomplete
+      - Low: Nice-to-have features missing, minor documentation gaps
+    `,
+    performance: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - N+1 query problems
+      - Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n log n) possible)
+      - Memory leaks
+      - Blocking operations on main thread
+      - Missing caching opportunities
+      - Resource usage (CPU, memory, network)
+      - Database query optimization
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Memory leaks, O(n²) in hot path, blocking main thread
+      - High: N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms
+      - Medium: Suboptimal caching, unnecessary computations, lazy loading issues
+      - Low: Minor optimization opportunities, redundant operations
+    `,
+    maintainability: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Technical debt indicators
+      - Magic numbers and hardcoded values
+      - Long methods (>50 lines)
+      - Large classes (>500 lines)
+      - Dead code and commented code
+      - Code documentation
+      - Test coverage
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Massive methods (>200 lines), severe technical debt blocking changes
+      - High: Large methods (>100 lines), significant dead code, undocumented complex logic
+      - Medium: Magic numbers, moderate technical debt, missing tests
+      - Low: Minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic improvements
+    `,
+    'best-practices': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Framework conventions adherence
+      - Language idioms
+      - Anti-patterns
+      - Deprecated API usage
+      - Coding standards compliance
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Logging and monitoring
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe anti-patterns, deprecated APIs with security risks
+      - High: Major convention violations, poor error handling, missing logging
+      - Medium: Minor anti-patterns, style inconsistencies, suboptimal patterns
+      - Low: Cosmetic style issues, minor convention deviations
+    `
+  };
+
+  return guidance[dimension] || 'Standard code review analysis';
+}
+```
+
+### Completion Conditions
+
+**Full Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Critical findings = 0
+- High findings ≤ 5
+- Action: Generate final report, mark phase=complete
+
+**Partial Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Max iterations reached
+- Still have critical/high findings
+- Action: Generate report with warnings, recommend follow-up
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase-Level Error Matrix**:
+
+| Phase | Error | Blocking? | Action |
+|-------|-------|-----------|--------|
+| Phase 1 | Session not found | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No completed tasks | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No changed files | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 2 | Single dimension fails | No | Log warning, continue other dimensions |
+| Phase 2 | All dimensions fail | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 3 | Missing dimension JSON | No | Skip in aggregation, log warning |
+| Phase 4 | Deep-dive agent fails | No | Skip finding, continue others |
+| Phase 4 | Max iterations reached | No | Generate partial report |
+
+**CLI Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → degraded mode
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+1. HTTP 429, 5xx errors, connection timeout
+2. Invalid JSON output (parse error, missing required fields)
+3. Low confidence score < 0.4
+4. Analysis too brief (< 100 words in report)
+
+**Fallback Behavior**:
+- On trigger: Retry with next tool in chain
+- After Codex fails: Enter degraded mode (skip analysis, log error)
+- Degraded mode: Continue workflow with available results
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing" },
+    { content: "Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (7 dimensions)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Reviewing" },
+    { content: "  → Security review", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Analyzing security" },
+    // ... other dimensions as sub-items
+    { content: "Phase 3: Aggregation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Aggregating" },
+    { content: "Phase 4: Deep-dive", status: "pending", activeForm: "Deep-diving" },
+    { content: "Phase 5: Completion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Completing" }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Default Settings Work**: 7 dimensions + 3 iterations sufficient for most cases
+2. **Parallel Execution**: ~60 minutes for full initial review (7 dimensions)
+3. **Trust Aggregation Logic**: Auto-selection based on proven heuristics
+4. **Monitor Logs**: Check reports/ directory for CLI analysis insights
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### View Review Progress
+Use `ccw view` to open the review dashboard in browser:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+### Automated Fix Workflow
+After completing a review, use the generated findings JSON for automated fixing:
+
+```bash
+# Step 1: Complete review (this command)
+/workflow:review-session-cycle
+
+# Step 2: Run automated fixes using dimension findings
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+```
+
+See `/workflow:review-fix` for automated fixing with smart grouping, parallel execution, and test verification.
+

.claude/commands/workflow/review.md

@@ -1,26 +1,20 @@
 ---
 name: review
-description: Optional specialized review (security, architecture, docs) for completed implementation
-usage: /workflow:review [--type=<type>] [session-id]
-argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [session-id]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:review                           # Quality review of active session
-  - /workflow:review --type=security           # Security audit of active session
-  - /workflow:review --type=architecture WFS-user-auth  # Architecture review of specific session
-  - /workflow:review --type=action-items       # Pre-deployment verification
+description: Post-implementation review with specialized types (security/architecture/action-items/quality) using analysis agents and Gemini
+argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [optional: session-id]"
 ---
 
-### 🚀 Command Overview: `/workflow:review`
+## Command Overview: /workflow:review
 
 **Optional specialized review** for completed implementations. In the standard workflow, **passing tests = approved code**. Use this command only when specialized review is required (security, architecture, compliance, docs).
 
 ## Philosophy: "Tests Are the Review"
 
-- ✅ **Default**: All tests pass → Code approved
-- 🔍 **Optional**: Specialized reviews for:
-  - 🔒 Security audits (vulnerabilities, auth/authz)
-  - 🏗️ Architecture compliance (patterns, technical debt)
-  - 📋 Action items verification (requirements met, acceptance criteria)
+- **Default**: All tests pass -> Code approved
+- **Optional**: Specialized reviews for:
+  - Security audits (vulnerabilities, auth/authz)
+  - Architecture compliance (patterns, technical debt)
+  - Action items verification (requirements met, acceptance criteria)
 
 ## Review Types
 
@@ -35,6 +29,39 @@ examples:
 - For documentation generation, use `/workflow:tools:docs`
 - For CLAUDE.md updates, use `/update-memory-related`
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse --type flag (default: quality)
+   └─ Parse session-id argument (optional)
+
+Step 1: Session Resolution
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ session-id provided → Use provided session
+      └─ Not provided → Auto-detect from .workflow/active/
+
+Step 2: Validation
+   ├─ Check session directory exists
+   └─ Check for completed implementation (.summaries/IMPL-*.md exists)
+
+Step 3: Type Check
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ type=docs → Redirect to /workflow:tools:docs
+      └─ Other types → Continue to analysis
+
+Step 4: Model Analysis Phase
+   ├─ Load context (summaries, test results, changed files)
+   └─ Perform specialized review by type:
+      ├─ security → Security patterns + Gemini analysis
+      ├─ architecture → Qwen architecture analysis
+      ├─ quality → Gemini code quality analysis
+      └─ action-items → Requirements verification
+
+Step 5: Generate Report
+   └─ Output: REVIEW-{type}.md
+```
+
 ## Execution Template
 
 ```bash
@@ -45,18 +72,18 @@ examples:
 if [ -n "$SESSION_ARG" ]; then
     sessionId="$SESSION_ARG"
 else
-    sessionId=$(find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' | head -1 | sed 's/.*active-//')
+    sessionId=$(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1 | xargs basename)
 fi
 
 # Step 2: Validation
-if [ ! -d ".workflow/${sessionId}" ]; then
-    echo "❌ Session ${sessionId} not found"
+if [ ! -d ".workflow/active/${sessionId}" ]; then
+    echo "Session ${sessionId} not found"
     exit 1
 fi
 
 # Check for completed tasks
-if [ ! -d ".workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
-    echo "❌ No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first"
+if [ ! -d ".workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
+    echo "No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first"
     exit 1
 fi
 
@@ -65,7 +92,7 @@ review_type="${TYPE_ARG:-quality}"
 
 # Redirect docs review to specialized command
 if [ "$review_type" = "docs" ]; then
-    echo "💡 For documentation generation, please use:"
+    echo "For documentation generation, please use:"
     echo "   /workflow:tools:docs"
     echo ""
     echo "The docs command provides:"
@@ -79,80 +106,86 @@ fi
 # BASH_EXECUTION_STOPS → MODEL_ANALYSIS_BEGINS
 ```
 
-### 🧠 Model Analysis Phase
+### Model Analysis Phase
 
 After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 
 1. **Load Context**: Read completed task summaries and changed files
    ```bash
-   # Load implementation summaries
-   cat .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/IMPL-*.md
+   # Load implementation summaries (iterate through .summaries/ directory)
+   for summary in .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries/*.md; do
+     cat "$summary"
+   done
 
    # Load test results (if available)
-   cat .workflow/${sessionId}/.summaries/TEST-FIX-*.md 2>/dev/null
+   for test_summary in .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries/TEST-FIX-*.md 2>/dev/null; do
+     cat "$test_summary"
+   done
 
    # Get changed files
-   git log --since="$(cat .workflow/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json | jq -r .created_at)" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+   git log --since="$(cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json | jq -r .created_at)" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
    ```
 
 2. **Perform Specialized Review**: Based on `review_type`
 
    **Security Review** (`--type=security`):
-   - Use MCP code search for security patterns:
+   - Use ripgrep for security patterns:
      ```bash
-     mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="password|token|secret|auth", file_pattern="*.{ts,js,py}")
-     mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern="eval|exec|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML", file_pattern="*.{ts,js,tsx}")
+     rg "password|token|secret|auth" -g "*.{ts,js,py}"
+     rg "eval|exec|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML" -g "*.{ts,js,tsx}"
      ```
    - Use Gemini for security analysis:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Security audit of completed implementation
      TASK: Review code for security vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, auth/authz issues
-     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED: Security findings report with severity levels
      RULES: Focus on OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data validation, injection risks
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/active/${sessionId}
      ```
 
    **Architecture Review** (`--type=architecture`):
    - Use Qwen for architecture analysis:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Architecture compliance review
      TASK: Evaluate adherence to architectural patterns, identify technical debt, review design decisions
-     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED: Architecture assessment with recommendations
      RULES: Check for patterns, separation of concerns, modularity, scalability
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool qwen --mode write --cd .workflow/active/${sessionId}
      ```
 
    **Quality Review** (`--type=quality`):
    - Use Gemini for code quality:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Code quality and best practices review
      TASK: Assess code readability, maintainability, adherence to best practices
-     CONTEXT: @{.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED: Quality assessment with improvement suggestions
      RULES: Check for code smells, duplication, complexity, naming conventions
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/active/${sessionId}
      ```
 
    **Action Items Review** (`--type=action-items`):
    - Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria met:
      ```bash
      # Load task requirements and acceptance criteria
-     find .workflow/${sessionId}/.task -name "IMPL-*.json" -exec jq -r '
-       "Task: " + .id + "\n" +
-       "Requirements: " + (.context.requirements | join(", ")) + "\n" +
-       "Acceptance: " + (.context.acceptance | join(", "))
-     ' {} \;
+     for task_file in .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+       cat "$task_file" | jq -r '
+         "Task: " + .id + "\n" +
+         "Requirements: " + (.context.requirements | join(", ")) + "\n" +
+         "Acceptance: " + (.context.acceptance | join(", "))
+       '
+     done
 
      # Check implementation summaries against requirements
-     cd .workflow/${sessionId} && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria are met
      TASK: Cross-check implementation summaries against original requirements
-     CONTEXT: @{.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../..,../../CLAUDE.md}
+     CONTEXT: @.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
      EXPECTED:
      - Requirements coverage matrix
      - Acceptance criteria verification
@@ -163,7 +196,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
      - Verify all acceptance criteria are met
      - Flag any incomplete or missing action items
      - Assess deployment readiness
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/active/${sessionId}
      ```
 
 
@@ -201,7 +234,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 4. **Output Files**:
    ```bash
    # Save review report
-   Write(.workflow/${sessionId}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md)
+   Write(.workflow/active/${sessionId}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md)
 
    # Update session metadata
    # (optional) Update workflow-session.json with review status
@@ -211,7 +244,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
    ```bash
    # If architecture or quality issues found, suggest memory update
    if [ "$review_type" = "architecture" ] || [ "$review_type" = "quality" ]; then
-       echo "💡 Consider updating project documentation:"
+       echo "Consider updating project documentation:"
        echo "   /update-memory-related"
    fi
    ```
@@ -232,7 +265,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 /workflow:review --type=docs
 ```
 
-## ✨ Features
+## Features
 
 - **Simple Validation**: Check session exists and has completed tasks
 - **No Complex Orchestration**: Direct analysis, no multi-phase pipeline
@@ -246,10 +279,10 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 
 ```
 Standard Workflow:
-  plan → execute → test-gen → execute ✅
+  plan -> execute -> test-gen -> execute (complete)
 
 Optional Review (when needed):
-  plan → execute → test-gen → execute → review (security/architecture/docs)
+  plan -> execute -> test-gen -> execute -> review (security/architecture/docs)
 ```
 
 **When to Use**:
@@ -262,11 +295,3 @@ Optional Review (when needed):
 - Regular development (tests are sufficient)
 - Simple bug fixes (test-fix-agent handles it)
 - Minor changes (update-memory-related is enough)
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/workflow:execute` - Must complete implementation first
-- `/workflow:test-gen` - Primary quality gate (tests)
-- `/workflow:tools:docs` - Generate hierarchical documentation (use instead of `--type=docs`)
-- `/update-memory-related` - Update CLAUDE.md docs after architecture findings
-- `/workflow:status` - Check session status

.claude/commands/workflow/session/complete.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: complete
-description: Mark the active workflow session as complete and remove active flag
-usage: /workflow:session:complete
+description: Mark active workflow session as complete, archive with lessons learned, update manifest, remove active flag
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:complete
   - /workflow:session:complete --detailed
@@ -9,98 +8,146 @@ examples:
 
 # Complete Workflow Session (/workflow:session:complete)
 
-## Overview
-Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, update its status, and remove the active flag marker.
+Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, archive it, and update manifests.
+
+## Pre-defined Commands
 
-## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:session:complete           # Complete current active session
-/workflow:session:complete --detailed # Show detailed completion summary
+# Phase 1: Find active session
+SESSION_PATH=$(find .workflow/active/ -maxdepth 1 -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1)
+SESSION_ID=$(basename "$SESSION_PATH")
+
+# Phase 3: Move to archive
+mkdir -p .workflow/archives/
+mv .workflow/active/$SESSION_ID .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID
+
+# Cleanup marker
+rm -f .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID/.archiving
 ```
 
-## Implementation Flow
+## Key Files to Read
+
+**For manifest.json generation**, read ONLY these files:
+
+| File | Extract |
+|------|---------|
+| `$SESSION_PATH/workflow-session.json` | session_id, description, started_at, status |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/IMPL_PLAN.md` | title (first # heading), description (first paragraph) |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/.tasks/*.json` | count files |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/.summaries/*.md` | count files |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/.review/dimensions/*.json` | count + findings summary (optional) |
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Phase 1: Find Session (2 commands)
 
-### Step 1: Find Active Session
 ```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
+# 1. Find and extract session
+SESSION_PATH=$(find .workflow/active/ -maxdepth 1 -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1)
+SESSION_ID=$(basename "$SESSION_PATH")
+
+# 2. Check/create archiving marker
+test -f "$SESSION_PATH/.archiving" && echo "RESUMING" || touch "$SESSION_PATH/.archiving"
 ```
 
-### Step 2: Get Session Name
+**Output**: `SESSION_ID` = e.g., `WFS-auth-feature`
+
+### Phase 2: Generate Manifest Entry (Read-only)
+
+Read the key files above, then build this structure:
+
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "<from workflow-session.json>",
+  "description": "<from workflow-session.json>",
+  "archived_at": "<current ISO timestamp>",
+  "archive_path": ".workflow/archives/<SESSION_ID>",
+  "metrics": {
+    "duration_hours": "<(completed_at - started_at) / 3600000>",
+    "tasks_completed": "<count .tasks/*.json>",
+    "summaries_generated": "<count .summaries/*.md>",
+    "review_metrics": {
+      "dimensions_analyzed": "<count .review/dimensions/*.json>",
+      "total_findings": "<sum from dimension JSONs>"
+    }
+  },
+  "tags": ["<3-5 keywords from IMPL_PLAN.md>"],
+  "lessons": {
+    "successes": ["<key wins>"],
+    "challenges": ["<difficulties>"],
+    "watch_patterns": ["<patterns to monitor>"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Lessons Generation**: Use gemini with `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/archive/analysis-simple.txt`
+
+### Phase 3: Atomic Commit (4 commands)
+
 ```bash
-basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//'
+# 1. Create archive directory
+mkdir -p .workflow/archives/
+
+# 2. Move session
+mv .workflow/active/$SESSION_ID .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID
+
+# 3. Update manifest.json (Read → Append → Write)
+# Read: .workflow/archives/manifest.json (or [])
+# Append: archive_entry from Phase 2
+# Write: updated JSON
+
+# 4. Remove marker
+rm -f .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID/.archiving
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Update Session Status
+**Output**:
+```
+✓ Session "$SESSION_ID" archived successfully
+  Location: .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID/
+  Manifest: Updated with N total sessions
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Update project.json (Optional)
+
+**Skip if**: `.workflow/project.json` doesn't exist
+
 ```bash
-jq '.status = "completed"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+# Check
+test -f .workflow/project.json || echo "SKIP"
 ```
 
-### Step 4: Add Completion Timestamp
-```bash
-jq '.completed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+**If exists**, add feature entry:
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "<slugified title>",
+  "title": "<from IMPL_PLAN.md>",
+  "status": "completed",
+  "tags": ["<from Phase 2>"],
+  "timeline": { "implemented_at": "<date>" },
+  "traceability": { "session_id": "<SESSION_ID>", "archive_path": "<path>" }
+}
 ```
 
-### Step 5: Count Final Statistics
-```bash
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+**Output**:
+```
+✓ Feature added to project registry
 ```
 
-### Step 6: Remove Active Marker
-```bash
-rm .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
+## Error Recovery
+
+| Phase | Symptom | Recovery |
+|-------|---------|----------|
+| 1 | No active session | `No active session found` |
+| 2 | Analysis fails | Remove marker: `rm $SESSION_PATH/.archiving`, retry |
+| 3 | Move fails | Session safe in active/, fix issue, retry |
+| 3 | Manifest fails | Session in archives/, manually add entry, remove marker |
+
+## Quick Reference
+
 ```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Find active session**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
-- **Get session name**: `basename marker | sed 's/^\.active-//'`
-- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "completed"' session.json > temp.json`
-- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.completed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
-- **Count tasks**: `find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l`
-- **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l`
-- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-session`
-
-### Completion Result
+Phase 1: find session → create .archiving marker
+Phase 2: read key files → build manifest entry (no writes)
+Phase 3: mkdir → mv → update manifest.json → rm marker
+Phase 4: update project.json features array (optional)
 ```
-Session WFS-user-auth completed
-- Status: completed
-- Started: 2025-09-15T10:00:00Z
-- Completed: 2025-09-15T16:30:00Z
-- Duration: 6h 30m
-- Total tasks: 8
-- Completed tasks: 8
-- Success rate: 100%
-```
-
-### Detailed Summary (--detailed flag)
-```
-Session Completion Summary:
-├── Session: WFS-user-auth
-├── Project: User authentication system
-├── Total time: 6h 30m
-├── Tasks completed: 8/8 (100%)
-├── Files generated: 24 files
-├── Summaries created: 8 summaries
-├── Status: All tasks completed successfully
-└── Location: .workflow/WFS-user-auth/
-```
-
-### Error Handling
-```bash
-# No active session
-find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f 2>/dev/null || echo "No active session found"
-
-# Incomplete tasks
-task_count=$(find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l)
-summary_count=$(find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-test $task_count -eq $summary_count || echo "Warning: Not all tasks completed"
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:list` - View all sessions including completed
-- `/workflow:session:start` - Start new session
-- `/workflow:status` - Check completion status before completing

.claude/commands/workflow/session/list.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: list
-description: List all workflow sessions with status
-usage: /workflow:session:list
+description: List all workflow sessions with status filtering, shows session metadata and progress information
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:list
 ---
@@ -20,35 +19,35 @@ Display all workflow sessions with their current status, progress, and metadata.
 
 ### Step 1: Find All Sessions
 ```bash
-ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
+ls .workflow/active/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
 ```
 
 ### Step 2: Check Active Session
 ```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
+find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1
 ```
 
 ### Step 3: Read Session Metadata
 ```bash
-jq -r '.session_id, .status, .project' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+jq -r '.session_id, .status, .project' .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
 ### Step 4: Count Task Progress
 ```bash
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+find .workflow/active/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
+find .workflow/active/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
 ```
 
 ### Step 5: Get Creation Time
 ```bash
-jq -r '.created_at // "unknown"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+jq -r '.created_at // "unknown"' .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands
 
 ### Basic Operations
-- **List sessions**: `find .workflow/ -maxdepth 1 -type d -name "WFS-*"`
-- **Find active**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
+- **List sessions**: `find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d`
+- **Find active**: `find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d`
 - **Read session data**: `jq -r '.session_id, .status' session.json`
 - **Count tasks**: `find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l`
 - **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l`
@@ -60,19 +59,19 @@ jq -r '.created_at // "unknown"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 Workflow Sessions:
 
-✅ WFS-oauth-integration (ACTIVE)
+[ACTIVE] WFS-oauth-integration
    Project: OAuth2 authentication system
    Status: active
    Progress: 3/8 tasks completed
    Created: 2025-09-15T10:30:00Z
 
-⏸️ WFS-user-profile (PAUSED)
+[PAUSED] WFS-user-profile
    Project: User profile management
    Status: paused
    Progress: 1/5 tasks completed
    Created: 2025-09-14T14:15:00Z
 
-📁 WFS-database-migration (COMPLETED)
+[COMPLETED] WFS-database-migration
    Project: Database schema migration
    Status: completed
    Progress: 4/4 tasks completed
@@ -82,24 +81,16 @@ Total: 3 sessions (1 active, 1 paused, 1 completed)
 ```
 
 ### Status Indicators
-- **✅**: Active session
-- **⏸️**: Paused session
-- **📁**: Completed session
-- **❌**: Error/corrupted session
+- **[ACTIVE]**: Active session
+- **[PAUSED]**: Paused session
+- **[COMPLETED]**: Completed session
+- **[ERROR]**: Error/corrupted session
 
 ### Quick Commands
 ```bash
 # Count all sessions
-ls .workflow/WFS-* | wc -l
-
-# Show only active
-ls .workflow/.active-* | basename | sed 's/^\.active-//'
+ls .workflow/active/WFS-* | wc -l
 
 # Show recent sessions
-ls -t .workflow/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -3
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:start` - Create new session
-- `/workflow:session:switch` - Switch to different session
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Detailed session info
+ls -t .workflow/active/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -3
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/session/pause.md

@@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
----
-name: pause
-description: Pause the active workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:pause
-examples:
-  - /workflow:session:pause
----
-
-# Pause Workflow Session (/workflow:session:pause)
-
-## Overview
-Pause the currently active workflow session, saving all state for later resumption.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:session:pause      # Pause current active session
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Step 1: Find Active Session
-```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
-```
-
-### Step 2: Get Session Name
-```bash
-basename .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name | sed 's/^\.active-//'
-```
-
-### Step 3: Update Session Status
-```bash
-jq '.status = "paused"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 4: Add Pause Timestamp
-```bash
-jq '.paused_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 5: Remove Active Marker
-```bash
-rm .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Find active session**: `ls .workflow/.active-*`
-- **Get session name**: `basename marker | sed 's/^\.active-//'`
-- **Update status**: `jq '.status = "paused"' session.json > temp.json`
-- **Add timestamp**: `jq '.paused_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
-- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-session`
-
-### Pause Result
-```
-Session WFS-user-auth paused
-- Status: paused
-- Paused at: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
-- Tasks preserved: 8 tasks
-- Can resume with: /workflow:session:resume
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:resume` - Resume paused session
-- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all sessions including paused
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Check session state

.claude/commands/workflow/session/resume.md

@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: resume
-description: Resume the most recently paused workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:resume
-examples:
-  - /workflow:session:resume
+description: Resume the most recently paused workflow session with automatic session discovery and status update
 ---
 
 # Resume Workflow Session (/workflow:session:resume)
@@ -20,45 +17,39 @@ Resume the most recently paused workflow session, restoring all context and stat
 
 ### Step 1: Find Paused Sessions
 ```bash
-ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
+ls .workflow/active/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
 ```
 
 ### Step 2: Check Session Status
 ```bash
-jq -r '.status' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+jq -r '.status' .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
 ### Step 3: Find Most Recent Paused
 ```bash
-ls -t .workflow/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -1
+ls -t .workflow/active/WFS-*/workflow-session.json | head -1
 ```
 
 ### Step 4: Update Session Status
 ```bash
-jq '.status = "active"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
+jq '.status = "active"' .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
 ### Step 5: Add Resume Timestamp
 ```bash
-jq '.resumed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 6: Create Active Marker
-```bash
-touch .workflow/.active-WFS-session-name
+jq '.resumed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
+mv temp.json .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
 ```
 
 ## Simple Bash Commands
 
 ### Basic Operations
-- **List sessions**: `ls .workflow/WFS-*`
+- **List sessions**: `ls .workflow/active/WFS-*`
 - **Check status**: `jq -r '.status' session.json`
-- **Find recent**: `ls -t .workflow/*/workflow-session.json | head -1`
+- **Find recent**: `ls -t .workflow/active/*/workflow-session.json | head -1`
 - **Update status**: `jq '.status = "active"' session.json > temp.json`
 - **Add timestamp**: `jq '.resumed_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"'`
-- **Create marker**: `touch .workflow/.active-session`
 
 ### Resume Result
 ```
@@ -67,9 +58,4 @@ Session WFS-user-auth resumed
 - Paused at: 2025-09-15T14:30:00Z
 - Resumed at: 2025-09-15T15:45:00Z
 - Ready for: /workflow:execute
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:pause` - Pause current session
-- `/workflow:execute` - Continue workflow execution
-- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all sessions
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/session/start.md

@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: start
-description: Discover existing sessions or start a new workflow session with intelligent session management
-usage: /workflow:session:start [--auto|--new] [task_description]
-argument-hint: [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
+description: Discover existing sessions or start new workflow session with intelligent session management and conflict detection
+argument-hint: [--type <workflow|review|tdd|test|docs>] [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:start
   - /workflow:session:start --auto "implement OAuth2 authentication"
-  - /workflow:session:start --new "fix login bug"
+  - /workflow:session:start --type review "Code review for auth module"
+  - /workflow:session:start --type tdd --auto "implement user authentication"
+  - /workflow:session:start --type test --new "test payment flow"
 ---
 
 # Start Workflow Session (/workflow:session:start)
@@ -14,6 +15,52 @@ examples:
 ## Overview
 Manages workflow sessions with three operation modes: discovery (manual), auto (intelligent), and force-new.
 
+**Dual Responsibility**:
+1. **Project-level initialization** (first-time only): Creates `.workflow/project.json` for feature registry
+2. **Session-level initialization** (always): Creates session directory structure
+
+## Session Types
+
+The `--type` parameter classifies sessions for CCW dashboard organization:
+
+| Type | Description | Default For |
+|------|-------------|-------------|
+| `workflow` | Standard implementation (default) | `/workflow:plan` |
+| `review` | Code review sessions | `/workflow:review-module-cycle` |
+| `tdd` | TDD-based development | `/workflow:tdd-plan` |
+| `test` | Test generation/fix sessions | `/workflow:test-fix-gen` |
+| `docs` | Documentation sessions | `/memory:docs` |
+
+**Validation**: If `--type` is provided with invalid value, return error:
+```
+ERROR: Invalid session type. Valid types: workflow, review, tdd, test, docs
+```
+
+## Step 0: Initialize Project State (First-time Only)
+
+**Executed before all modes** - Ensures project-level state file exists by calling `/workflow:init`.
+
+### Check and Initialize
+```bash
+# Check if project state exists
+bash(test -f .workflow/project.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND")
+```
+
+**If NOT_FOUND**, delegate to `/workflow:init`:
+```javascript
+// Call workflow:init for intelligent project analysis
+SlashCommand({command: "/workflow:init"});
+
+// Wait for init completion
+// project.json will be created with comprehensive project overview
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- If EXISTS: `PROJECT_STATE: initialized`
+- If NOT_FOUND: Calls `/workflow:init` → creates `.workflow/project.json` with full project analysis
+
+**Note**: `/workflow:init` uses cli-explore-agent to build comprehensive project understanding (technology stack, architecture, key components). This step runs once per project. Subsequent executions skip initialization.
+
 ## Mode 1: Discovery Mode (Default)
 
 ### Usage
@@ -21,19 +68,14 @@ Manages workflow sessions with three operation modes: discovery (manual), auto (
 /workflow:session:start
 ```
 
-### Step 1: Check Active Sessions
+### Step 1: List Active Sessions
 ```bash
-bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null)
+bash(ls -1 .workflow/active/ 2>/dev/null | head -5)
 ```
 
-### Step 2: List All Sessions
+### Step 2: Display Session Metadata
 ```bash
-bash(ls -1 .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null | head -5)
-```
-
-### Step 3: Display Session Metadata
-```bash
-bash(cat .workflow/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json)
+bash(cat .workflow/active/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json)
 ```
 
 ### Step 4: User Decision
@@ -50,7 +92,7 @@ Present session information and wait for user to select or create session.
 
 ### Step 1: Check Active Sessions Count
 ```bash
-bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
+bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
 ```
 
 ### Step 2a: No Active Sessions → Create New
@@ -59,15 +101,12 @@ bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
 bash(echo "implement OAuth2 auth" | sed 's/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/-/g' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | cut -c1-50)
 
 # Create directory structure
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.process)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.task)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.summaries)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.process)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.task)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.summaries)
 
-# Create metadata
-bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-implement-oauth2-auth","project":"implement OAuth2 auth","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/workflow-session.json)
-
-# Mark as active
-bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-implement-oauth2-auth)
+# Create metadata (include type field, default to "workflow" if not specified)
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-implement-oauth2-auth","project":"implement OAuth2 auth","status":"planning","type":"workflow","created_at":"2024-12-04T08:00:00Z"}' > .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/workflow-session.json)
 ```
 
 **Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-implement-oauth2-auth`
@@ -75,10 +114,10 @@ bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-implement-oauth2-auth)
 ### Step 2b: Single Active Session → Check Relevance
 ```bash
 # Extract session ID
-bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
 
 # Read project name from metadata
-bash(cat .workflow/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json | grep -o '"project":"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
+bash(cat .workflow/active/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json | grep -o '"project":"[^"]*"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
 
 # Check keyword match (manual comparison)
 # If task contains project keywords → Reuse session
@@ -91,7 +130,7 @@ bash(cat .workflow/WFS-promptmaster-platform/workflow-session.json | grep -o '"p
 ### Step 2c: Multiple Active Sessions → Use First
 ```bash
 # Get first active session
-bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename | sed 's/^\.active-//')
+bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
 
 # Output warning and session ID
 # WARNING: Multiple active sessions detected
@@ -111,29 +150,28 @@ bash(ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename | sed 's/^\.a
 bash(echo "fix login bug" | sed 's/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/-/g' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | cut -c1-50)
 
 # Check if exists, add counter if needed
-bash(ls .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug 2>/dev/null && echo "WFS-fix-login-bug-2" || echo "WFS-fix-login-bug")
+bash(ls .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug 2>/dev/null && echo "WFS-fix-login-bug-2" || echo "WFS-fix-login-bug")
 ```
 
 ### Step 2: Create Session Structure
 ```bash
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/.process)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/.task)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/.summaries)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/.process)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/.task)
+bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/.summaries)
 ```
 
 ### Step 3: Create Metadata
 ```bash
-bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-fix-login-bug","project":"fix login bug","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/WFS-fix-login-bug/workflow-session.json)
-```
-
-### Step 4: Mark Active and Clean Old Markers
-```bash
-bash(rm .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null)
-bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-fix-login-bug)
+# Include type field from --type parameter (default: "workflow")
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-fix-login-bug","project":"fix login bug","status":"planning","type":"workflow","created_at":"2024-12-04T08:00:00Z"}' > .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/workflow-session.json)
 ```
 
 **Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-fix-login-bug`
 
+## Execution Guideline
+
+- **Non-interrupting**: When called from other commands, this command completes and returns control to the caller without interrupting subsequent tasks.
+
 ## Output Format Specification
 
 ### Success
@@ -154,68 +192,9 @@ DECISION: Reusing existing session
 SESSION_ID: WFS-promptmaster-platform
 ```
 
-## Command Integration
-
-### For /workflow:plan (Use Auto Mode)
-```bash
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"implement OAuth2 authentication\"")
-
-# Parse session ID from output
-grep "^SESSION_ID:" | awk '{print $2}'
-```
-
-### For Interactive Workflows (Use Discovery Mode)
-```bash
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start")
-```
-
-### For New Isolated Work (Use Force New Mode)
-```bash
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"experimental feature\"")
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-```bash
-# Check active sessions
-bash(ls .workflow/.active-*)
-
-# List all sessions
-bash(ls .workflow/WFS-*)
-
-# Read session metadata
-bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/workflow-session.json)
-
-# Create session directories
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.process)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.task)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.summaries)
-
-# Mark session as active
-bash(touch .workflow/.active-WFS-[session-id])
-
-# Clean active markers
-bash(rm .workflow/.active-*)
-```
-
-### Generate Session Slug
-```bash
-bash(echo "Task Description" | sed 's/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/-/g' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | cut -c1-50)
-```
-
-### Create Metadata JSON
-```bash
-bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-test","project":"test project","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/WFS-test/workflow-session.json)
-```
 
 ## Session ID Format
 - Pattern: `WFS-[lowercase-slug]`
 - Characters: `a-z`, `0-9`, `-` only
 - Max length: 50 characters
-- Uniqueness: Add numeric suffix if collision (`WFS-auth-2`, `WFS-auth-3`)
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Uses `--auto` mode for session management
-- `/workflow:execute` - Uses discovery mode for session selection
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Shows detailed session information
+- Uniqueness: Add numeric suffix if collision (`WFS-auth-2`, `WFS-auth-3`)

.claude/commands/workflow/session/switch.md

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
----
-name: switch
-description: Switch to a different workflow session
-usage: /workflow:session:switch <session-id>
-argument-hint: session-id to switch to
-examples:
-  - /workflow:session:switch WFS-oauth-integration
-  - /workflow:session:switch WFS-user-profile
----
-
-# Switch Workflow Session (/workflow:session:switch)
-
-## Overview
-Switch the active session to a different workflow session.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:session:switch WFS-session-name     # Switch to specific session
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Step 1: Validate Target Session
-```bash
-test -d .workflow/WFS-target-session && echo "Session exists"
-```
-
-### Step 2: Pause Current Session
-```bash
-ls .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null | head -1
-jq '.status = "paused"' .workflow/current-session/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-```
-
-### Step 3: Remove Current Active Marker
-```bash
-rm .workflow/.active-* 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-### Step 4: Activate Target Session
-```bash
-jq '.status = "active"' .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 5: Create New Active Marker
-```bash
-touch .workflow/.active-WFS-target-session
-```
-
-### Step 6: Add Switch Timestamp
-```bash
-jq '.switched_at = "'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"' .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json > temp.json
-mv temp.json .workflow/WFS-target/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Check session exists**: `test -d .workflow/WFS-session`
-- **Find current active**: `ls .workflow/.active-*`
-- **Pause current**: `jq '.status = "paused"' session.json > temp.json`
-- **Remove marker**: `rm .workflow/.active-*`
-- **Activate target**: `jq '.status = "active"' target.json > temp.json`
-- **Create marker**: `touch .workflow/.active-target`
-
-### Switch Result
-```
-Switched to session: WFS-oauth-integration
-- Previous: WFS-user-auth (paused)
-- Current: WFS-oauth-integration (active)
-- Switched at: 2025-09-15T15:45:00Z
-- Ready for: /workflow:execute
-```
-
-### Error Handling
-```bash
-# Session not found
-test -d .workflow/WFS-nonexistent || echo "Error: Session not found"
-
-# No sessions available
-ls .workflow/WFS-* 2>/dev/null || echo "No sessions available"
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:session:list` - Show all available sessions
-- `/workflow:session:pause` - Pause current before switching
-- `/workflow:execute` - Continue with new active session

.claude/commands/workflow/status.md

@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
----
-name: workflow:status
-description: Generate on-demand views from JSON task data
-usage: /workflow:status [task-id]
-argument-hint: [optional: task-id]
-examples:
-  - /workflow:status
-  - /workflow:status impl-1
-  - /workflow:status --validate
----
-
-# Workflow Status Command (/workflow:status)
-
-## Overview
-Generates on-demand views from JSON task data. No synchronization needed - all views are calculated from the current state of JSON files.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:status                    # Show current workflow overview
-/workflow:status impl-1             # Show specific task details
-/workflow:status --validate         # Validate workflow integrity
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Step 1: Find Active Session
-```bash
-find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f 2>/dev/null | head -1
-```
-
-### Step 2: Load Session Data
-```bash
-cat .workflow/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 3: Scan Task Files
-```bash
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-### Step 4: Generate Task Status
-```bash
-cat .workflow/WFS-session/.task/impl-1.json | jq -r '.status'
-```
-
-### Step 5: Count Task Progress
-```bash
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l
-find .workflow/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-```
-
-### Step 6: Display Overview
-```markdown
-# Workflow Overview
-**Session**: WFS-session-name
-**Progress**: 3/8 tasks completed
-
-## Active Tasks
-- [⚠️] impl-1: Current task in progress
-- [ ] impl-2: Next pending task
-
-## Completed Tasks
-- [✅] impl-0: Setup completed
-```
-
-## Simple Bash Commands
-
-### Basic Operations
-- **Find active session**: `find .workflow/ -name ".active-*" -type f`
-- **Read session info**: `cat .workflow/session/workflow-session.json`
-- **List tasks**: `find .workflow/session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f`
-- **Check task status**: `cat task.json | jq -r '.status'`
-- **Count completed**: `find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f | wc -l`
-
-### Task Status Check
-- **pending**: Not started yet
-- **active**: Currently in progress
-- **completed**: Finished with summary
-- **blocked**: Waiting for dependencies
-
-### Validation Commands
-```bash
-# Check session exists
-test -f .workflow/.active-* && echo "Session active"
-
-# Validate task files
-for f in .workflow/session/.task/*.json; do jq empty "$f" && echo "Valid: $f"; done
-
-# Check summaries match
-find .task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l
-find .summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-```
-
-## Simple Output Format
-
-### Default Overview
-```
-Session: WFS-user-auth
-Status: ACTIVE
-Progress: 5/12 tasks
-
-Current: impl-3 (Building API endpoints)
-Next: impl-4 (Adding authentication)
-Completed: impl-1, impl-2
-```
-
-### Task Details
-```
-Task: impl-1
-Title: Build authentication module
-Status: completed
-Agent: code-developer
-Created: 2025-09-15
-Completed: 2025-09-15
-Summary: .summaries/impl-1-summary.md
-```
-
-### Validation Results
-```
-✅ Session file valid
-✅ 8 task files found
-✅ 3 summaries found
-⚠️ 5 tasks pending completion
-```
-
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:execute` - Uses this for task discovery
-- `/workflow:resume` - Uses this for progress analysis
-- `/workflow:session:status` - Shows session metadata

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-plan.md

@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-plan
-description: Orchestrate TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chains
-usage: /workflow:tdd-plan [--agent] <input>
-argument-hint: "[--agent] \"feature description\"|file.md|ISS-001"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tdd-plan "Implement user authentication"
-  - /workflow:tdd-plan --agent requirements.md
-  - /workflow:tdd-plan ISS-001
+description: TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chain generation, test-first development structure, and cycle tracking
+argument-hint: "\"feature description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -14,26 +9,43 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 5 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Dispatches 6 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation with Red-Green-Refactor task generation.
 
-**Execution Modes**:
-- **Manual Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd`
-- **Agent Mode** (`--agent`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --agent`
+**CLI Tool Selection**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description. Include "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen" in your request for CLI execution.
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand dispatch **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When dispatching a sub-command (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically dispatch next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is dispatch Phase 1
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data for next phase
-4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous output
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 7 completes (with concept verification)
+4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to dispatch next pending phase automatically
+5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 6. **TDD Context**: All descriptions include "TDD:" prefix
-7. **Quality Gate**: Phase 5 concept verification ensures clarity before task generation
+7. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+8. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and dispatch next phase
 
-## 7-Phase Execution (with Concept Verification)
+## 6-Phase Execution (with Conflict Resolution)
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
-**Command**: `/workflow:session:start --auto "TDD: [structured-description]"`
+
+**Step 1.1: Dispatch** - Session discovery and initialization
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type tdd --auto \"TDD: [structured-description]\"")
+```
 
 **TDD Structured Format**:
 ```
@@ -46,13 +58,45 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 
 **Parse**: Extract sessionId
 
-### Phase 2: Context Gathering
-**Command**: `/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] "TDD: [structured-description]"`
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
 
-**Parse**: Extract contextPath
+**After Phase 1**: Return to user showing Phase 1 results, then auto-continue to Phase 2
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Context Gathering
+
+**Step 2.1: Dispatch** - Context gathering and analysis
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"TDD: [structured-description]\"")
+```
+
+**Use Same Structured Description**: Pass the same structured format from Phase 1
+
+**Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: context-package.json path (store as `contextPath`)
+- Typical pattern: `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/context-package.json`
+
+**Validation**:
+- Context package path extracted
+- File exists and is valid JSON
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+**After Phase 2**: Return to user showing Phase 2 results, then auto-continue to Phase 3
+
+---
 
 ### Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis
-**Command**: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]`
+
+**Step 3.1: Dispatch** - Test coverage analysis and framework detection
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]")
+```
 
 **Purpose**: Analyze existing codebase for:
 - Existing test patterns and conventions
@@ -60,104 +104,324 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 - Related components and integration points
 - Test framework detection
 
-**Parse**: Extract testContextPath (`.workflow/[sessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`)
+**Parse**: Extract testContextPath (`.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`)
 
-**Benefits**:
-- Makes TDD aware of existing environment
-- Identifies reusable test patterns
-- Prevents duplicate test creation
-- Enables integration with existing tests
 
-### Phase 4: TDD Analysis
-**Command**: `/workflow:tools:concept-enhanced --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]`
 
-**Note**: Generates ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md with TDD-specific structure:
-- Feature list with testable requirements
-- Test cases for Red phase
-- Implementation requirements for Green phase
-- Refactoring opportunities
-- Task dependencies and execution order
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather dispatched, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
 
-**Parse**: Verify ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md contains TDD breakdown sections
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Detect test framework and conventions", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting test framework"},
+  {"content": "  → Analyze existing test coverage", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test coverage"},
+  {"content": "  → Identify coverage gaps", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
 
-### Phase 5: Concept Verification (NEW QUALITY GATE)
-**Command**: `/workflow:concept-verify --session [sessionId]`
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
-**Purpose**: Verify conceptual clarity before TDD task generation
-- Clarify test requirements and acceptance criteria
-- Resolve ambiguities in expected behavior
-- Validate TDD approach is appropriate
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
 
-**Behavior**:
-- If no ambiguities found → Auto-proceed to Phase 6
-- If ambiguities exist → Interactive clarification (up to 5 questions)
-- After clarifications → Auto-proceed to Phase 6
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
 
-**Parse**: Verify concept verification completed (check for clarifications section in ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md or synthesis file if exists)
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
 
-### Phase 6: TDD Task Generation
-**Command**:
-- Manual: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]`
-- Agent: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId] --agent`
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
-**Parse**: Extract feature count, chain count, task count
+**After Phase 3**: Return to user showing test coverage results, then auto-continue to Phase 4/5 (depending on conflict_risk)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Conflict Resolution (Optional - auto-triggered by conflict risk)
+
+**Trigger**: Only execute when context-package.json indicates conflict_risk is "medium" or "high"
+
+**Step 4.1: Dispatch** - Conflict detection and resolution
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")
+```
+
+**Input**:
+- sessionId from Phase 1
+- contextPath from Phase 2
+- conflict_risk from context-package.json
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: Execution status (success/skipped/failed)
+- Verify: conflict-resolution.json file path (if executed)
+
+**Validation**:
+- File `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/conflict-resolution.json` exists (if executed)
+
+**Skip Behavior**:
+- If conflict_risk is "none" or "low", skip directly to Phase 5
+- Display: "No significant conflicts detected, proceeding to TDD task generation"
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks when dispatched -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict Resolution", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing conflict resolution"},
+  {"content": "  → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Present conflicts to user", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Apply resolution strategies", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 4.1-4.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 4 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 4.1-4.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict Resolution", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing conflict resolution"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 4 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
+
+**After Phase 4**: Return to user showing conflict resolution results (if executed) and selected strategies, then auto-continue to Phase 5
+
+**Memory State Check**:
+- Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
+- If memory usage is high (>110K tokens or approaching context limits):
+
+  **Step 4.5: Dispatch** - Memory compaction
+
+  ```javascript
+  SlashCommand(command="/compact")
+  ```
+
+  - This optimizes memory before proceeding to Phase 5
+- Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
+- Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: TDD Task Generation
+
+**Step 5.1: Dispatch** - TDD task generation via action-planning-agent
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]")
+```
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description.
+
+**Parse**: Extract feature count, task count (not chain count - tasks now contain internal TDD cycles)
 
 **Validate**:
-- IMPL_PLAN.md exists (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
-- TEST-*.json, IMPL-*.json, REFACTOR-*.json exist
-- TODO_LIST.md exists
-- IMPL tasks include test-fix-cycle configuration
+- IMPL_PLAN.md exists (unified plan with TDD Implementation Tasks section)
+- IMPL-*.json files exist (one per feature, or container + subtasks for complex features)
+- TODO_LIST.md exists with internal TDD phase indicators
+- Each IMPL task includes:
+  - `meta.tdd_workflow: true`
+  - `flow_control.implementation_approach` with 3 steps (red/green/refactor)
+  - Green phase includes test-fix-cycle configuration
 - IMPL_PLAN.md contains workflow_type: "tdd" in frontmatter
+- Task count ≤10 (compliance with task limit)
 
-### Phase 7: TDD Structure Validation & Action Plan Verification (RECOMMENDED)
+<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-tdd dispatched, INSERT 3 task-generate-tdd tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "  → Discovery - analyze TDD requirements", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing TDD requirements"},
+  {"content": "  → Planning - design Red-Green-Refactor cycles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Designing TDD cycles"},
+  {"content": "  → Output - generate IMPL tasks with internal TDD phases", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating TDD tasks"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** task-generate-tdd's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks. Each generated IMPL task will contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycle.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 5.1-5.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 5 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 5.1-5.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 5 tasks completed and collapsed to summary. Each generated IMPL task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle internally.
+
+### Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation & Action Plan Verification (RECOMMENDED)
 **Internal validation first, then recommend external verification**
 
 **Internal Validation**:
-1. Each feature has TEST → IMPL → REFACTOR chain
-2. Dependencies: IMPL depends_on TEST, REFACTOR depends_on IMPL
-3. Meta fields: tdd_phase correct ("red"/"green"/"refactor")
-4. Agents: TEST uses @code-review-test-agent, IMPL/REFACTOR use @code-developer
-5. IMPL tasks contain test-fix-cycle in flow_control for iterative Green phase
+1. Each task contains complete TDD workflow (Red-Green-Refactor internally)
+2. Task structure validation:
+   - `meta.tdd_workflow: true` in all IMPL tasks
+   - `flow_control.implementation_approach` has exactly 3 steps
+   - Each step has correct `tdd_phase`: "red", "green", "refactor"
+3. Dependency validation:
+   - Sequential features: IMPL-N depends_on ["IMPL-(N-1)"] if needed
+   - Complex features: IMPL-N.M depends_on ["IMPL-N.(M-1)"] for subtasks
+4. Agent assignment: All IMPL tasks use @code-developer
+5. Test-fix cycle: Green phase step includes test-fix-cycle logic with max_iterations
+6. Task count: Total tasks ≤10 (simple + subtasks)
 
 **Return Summary**:
 ```
 TDD Planning complete for session: [sessionId]
 
 Features analyzed: [N]
-TDD chains generated: [N]
-Total tasks: [3N]
+Total tasks: [M] (1 task per simple feature + subtasks for complex features)
+
+Task breakdown:
+- Simple features: [K] tasks (IMPL-1 to IMPL-K)
+- Complex features: [L] features with [P] subtasks
+- Total task count: [M] (within 10-task limit)
 
 Structure:
-- Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
+- IMPL-1: {Feature 1 Name} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
+- IMPL-2: {Feature 2 Name} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
+- IMPL-3: {Complex Feature} (Container)
+  - IMPL-3.1: {Sub-feature A} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
+  - IMPL-3.2: {Sub-feature B} (Internal: Red → Green → Refactor)
 [...]
 
-Plan:
-- Unified Implementation Plan: .workflow/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
-  (includes TDD Task Chains section with workflow_type: "tdd")
+Plans generated:
+- Unified Implementation Plan: .workflow/active/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+  (includes TDD Implementation Tasks section with workflow_type: "tdd")
+- Task List: .workflow/active/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
+  (with internal TDD phase indicators)
 
-✅ Recommended Next Steps:
-1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify TDD plan quality
+TDD Configuration:
+- Each task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle
+- Green phase includes test-fix cycle (max 3 iterations)
+- Auto-revert on max iterations reached
+
+Recommended Next Steps:
+1. /workflow:action-plan-verify --session [sessionId]  # Verify TDD plan quality and dependencies
 2. /workflow:execute --session [sessionId]  # Start TDD execution
 3. /workflow:tdd-verify [sessionId]  # Post-execution TDD compliance check
 
-⚠️ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task dependencies
+Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task structure and dependencies
 ```
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-```javascript
-// Initialize (7 phases now with concept verification)
-[
-  {content: "Execute session discovery", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing session discovery"},
-  {content: "Execute context gathering", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {content: "Execute test coverage analysis", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {content: "Execute TDD analysis", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing TDD analysis"},
-  {content: "Execute concept verification", status: "pending", activeForm": "Executing concept verification"},
-  {content: "Execute TDD task generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {content: "Validate TDD structure", status: "pending", activeForm: "Validating TDD structure"}
-]
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for TDD workflow with test coverage analysis and Red-Green-Refactor cycle generation.
 
-// Update after each phase: mark current "completed", next "in_progress"
+### Key Principles
+
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand dispatched):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 3.1, 3.2, 3.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 3.1-3.3 collapse to "Execute test coverage analysis: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase dispatched (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins (conditional Phase 4 if conflict_risk ≥ medium) → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+### TDD-Specific Features
+
+- **Phase 3**: Test coverage analysis detects existing patterns and gaps
+- **Phase 5**: Generated IMPL tasks contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycles
+- **Conditional Phase 4**: Conflict resolution only if conflict_risk ≥ medium
+
+
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 3, 4, 5) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
+
+## Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+TDD Workflow Orchestrator
+│
+├─ Phase 1: Session Discovery
+│  └─ /workflow:session:start --auto
+│     └─ Returns: sessionId
+│
+├─ Phase 2: Context Gathering
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:context-gather
+│     └─ Returns: context-package.json path
+│
+├─ Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis                    ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-context-gather
+│     ├─ Phase 3.1: Detect test framework
+│     ├─ Phase 3.2: Analyze existing test coverage
+│     └─ Phase 3.3: Identify coverage gaps
+│     └─ Returns: test-context-package.json           ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 4: Conflict Resolution (conditional)
+│  IF conflict_risk ≥ medium:
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:conflict-resolution             ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│     ├─ Phase 4.1: Detect conflicts with CLI
+│     ├─ Phase 4.2: Present conflicts to user
+│     └─ Phase 4.3: Apply resolution strategies
+│     └─ Returns: conflict-resolution.json            ← COLLAPSED
+│  ELSE:
+│  └─ Skip to Phase 5
+│
+├─ Phase 5: TDD Task Generation                       ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd
+│     ├─ Phase 5.1: Discovery - analyze TDD requirements
+│     ├─ Phase 5.2: Planning - design Red-Green-Refactor cycles
+│     └─ Phase 5.3: Output - generate IMPL tasks with internal TDD phases
+│     └─ Returns: IMPL-*.json, IMPL_PLAN.md           ← COLLAPSED
+│        (Each IMPL task contains internal Red-Green-Refactor cycle)
+│
+└─ Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation
+   └─ Internal validation + summary returned
+   └─ Recommend: /workflow:action-plan-verify
+
+Key Points:
+• ← ATTACHED: SlashCommand attaches sub-tasks to orchestrator TodoWrite
+• ← COLLAPSED: Sub-tasks executed and collapsed to phase summary
+• TDD-specific: Each generated IMPL task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle
 ```
 
 ## Input Processing
@@ -176,100 +440,21 @@ Convert user input to TDD-structured format:
 - **TDD validation failure**: Report incomplete chains or wrong dependencies
 
 ## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:plan` - Standard (non-TDD) planning
-- `/workflow:execute` - Execute TDD tasks
-- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Verify TDD compliance
-- `/workflow:status` - View progress
-## TDD Workflow Enhancements
 
-### Overview
-The TDD workflow has been significantly enhanced by integrating best practices from both traditional `plan --agent` and `test-gen` workflows, creating a hybrid approach that bridges the gap between idealized TDD and real-world development complexity.
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- None - TDD planning is self-contained (can optionally run brainstorm commands before)
 
-### Key Improvements
+**Called by This Command** (6 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create or discover TDD workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2: Gather project context and analyze codebase
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 3: Analyze existing test patterns and coverage
+- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 4: Detect and resolve conflicts (auto-triggered if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
+- `/compact` - Phase 4: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` - Phase 5: Generate TDD tasks (CLI tool usage determined semantically)
 
-#### 1. Test Coverage Analysis (Phase 3)
-**Adopted from test-gen workflow**
-
-Before planning TDD tasks, the workflow now analyzes the existing codebase:
-- Detects existing test patterns and conventions
-- Identifies current test coverage
-- Discovers related components and integration points
-- Detects test framework automatically
-
-**Benefits**:
-- Context-aware TDD planning
-- Avoids duplicate test creation
-- Enables integration with existing tests
-- No longer assumes greenfield scenarios
-
-#### 2. Iterative Green Phase with Test-Fix Cycle
-**Adopted from test-gen workflow**
-
-IMPL (Green phase) tasks now include automatic test-fix cycle for resilient implementation:
-
-**Enhanced IMPL Task Flow**:
-```
-1. Write minimal implementation code
-2. Execute test suite
-3. IF tests pass → Complete task ✅
-4. IF tests fail → Enter fix cycle:
-   a. Gemini diagnoses with bug-fix template
-   b. Apply fix (manual or Codex)
-   c. Retest
-   d. Repeat (max 3 iterations)
-5. IF max iterations → Auto-revert changes 🔄
-```
-
-**Benefits**:
-- ✅ Faster feedback within Green phase
-- ✅ Autonomous recovery from implementation errors
-- ✅ Systematic debugging with Gemini
-- ✅ Safe rollback prevents broken state
-
-#### 3. Agent-Driven Planning
-**From plan --agent workflow**
-
-Supports action-planning-agent for more autonomous TDD planning with:
-- MCP tool integration (code-index, exa)
-- Memory-first principles
-- Brainstorming artifact integration
-- Task merging over decomposition
-
-### Workflow Comparison
-
-| Aspect | Previous | Current |
-|--------|----------|---------|
-| **Phases** | 5 | 6 (test coverage analysis) |
-| **Context** | Greenfield assumption | Existing codebase aware |
-| **Green Phase** | Single implementation | Iterative with fix cycle |
-| **Failure Handling** | Manual intervention | Auto-diagnose + fix + revert |
-| **Test Analysis** | None | Deep coverage analysis |
-| **Feedback Loop** | Post-execution | During Green phase |
-
-### Migration Notes
-
-**Backward Compatibility**: ✅ Fully compatible
-- Existing TDD workflows continue to work
-- New features are additive, not breaking
-- Phase 3 can be skipped if test-context-gather not available
-
-**Session Structure**:
-```
-.workflow/WFS-xxx/
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md (unified plan with TDD Task Chains section)
-├── TODO_LIST.md
-├── .process/
-│   ├── context-package.json
-│   ├── test-context-package.json
-│   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (enhanced with TDD breakdown)
-│   └── green-fix-iteration-*.md (fix logs)
-└── .task/
-    ├── TEST-*.json (Red phase)
-    ├── IMPL-*.json (Green phase with test-fix-cycle)
-    └── REFACTOR-*.json (Refactor phase)
-```
-
-**Configuration Options** (in IMPL tasks):
-- `meta.max_iterations`: Fix attempts (default: 3)
-- `meta.use_codex`: Auto-fix mode (default: false)
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:action-plan-verify` - Recommended: Verify TDD plan quality and structure before execution
+- `/workflow:status` - Review TDD task breakdown
+- `/workflow:execute` - Begin TDD implementation
+- `/workflow:tdd-verify` - Post-execution: Verify TDD compliance and generate quality report
 

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-verify.md

@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-verify
-description: Verify TDD workflow compliance and generate quality report
-usage: /workflow:tdd-verify [session-id]
-argument-hint: "[WFS-session-id]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tdd-verify
-  - /workflow:tdd-verify WFS-auth
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*)
+description: Verify TDD workflow compliance against Red-Green-Refactor cycles, generate quality report with coverage analysis
+
+argument-hint: "[optional: WFS-session-id]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini:*)
 ---
 
 # TDD Verification Command (/workflow:tdd-verify)
@@ -21,6 +18,39 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*)
 - Validate TDD cycle execution
 - Generate compliance report
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Decision (session argument):
+      ├─ session-id provided → Use provided session
+      └─ No session-id → Auto-detect active session
+
+Phase 1: Session Discovery
+   ├─ Validate session directory exists
+   └─ TodoWrite: Mark phase 1 completed
+
+Phase 2: Task Chain Validation
+   ├─ Load all task JSONs from .task/
+   ├─ Extract task IDs and group by feature
+   ├─ Validate TDD structure:
+   │  ├─ TEST-N.M → IMPL-N.M → REFACTOR-N.M chain
+   │  ├─ Dependency verification
+   │  └─ Meta field validation (tdd_phase, agent)
+   └─ TodoWrite: Mark phase 2 completed
+
+Phase 3: Test Execution Analysis
+   └─ /workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis
+      ├─ Coverage metrics extraction
+      ├─ TDD cycle verification
+      └─ Compliance score calculation
+
+Phase 4: Compliance Report Generation
+   ├─ Gemini analysis for comprehensive report
+   ├─ Generate TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+   └─ Return summary to user
+```
+
 ## 4-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
@@ -31,7 +61,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini-wrapper:*)
 sessionId = argument
 
 # Else auto-detect active session
-find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' | head -1 | sed 's/.*active-//'
+find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1 | sed 's/.*\///'
 ```
 
 **Extract**: sessionId
@@ -47,18 +77,32 @@ find .workflow/ -name '.active-*' | head -1 | sed 's/.*active-//'
 
 ```bash
 # Load all task JSONs
-find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json'
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file"
+done
 
 # Extract task IDs
-find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.id' {} \;
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.id'
+done
 
-# Check dependencies
-find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name 'IMPL-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' {} \;
-find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name 'REFACTOR-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' {} \;
+# Check dependencies - read tasks and filter for IMPL/REFACTOR
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/IMPL-*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?'
+done
+
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/REFACTOR-*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?'
+done
 
 # Check meta fields
-find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.tdd_phase' {} \;
-find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent' {} \;
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.meta.tdd_phase'
+done
+
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.meta.agent'
+done
 ```
 
 **Validation**:
@@ -85,9 +129,9 @@ find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent' {} \;
 - Compliance score
 
 **Validation**:
-- `.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/test-results.json` exists
-- `.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/coverage-report.json` exists
-- `.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md` exists
+- `.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.process/test-results.json` exists
+- `.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.process/coverage-report.json` exists
+- `.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md` exists
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
 
@@ -97,10 +141,10 @@ find .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent' {} \;
 **Gemini analysis for comprehensive TDD compliance report**
 
 ```bash
-cd project-root && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
+ccw cli -p "
 PURPOSE: Generate TDD compliance report
 TASK: Analyze TDD workflow execution and generate quality report
-CONTEXT: @{.workflow/{sessionId}/.task/*.json,.workflow/{sessionId}/.summaries/*,.workflow/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md}
+CONTEXT: @{.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json,.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.summaries/*,.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md}
 EXPECTED:
 - TDD compliance score (0-100)
 - Chain completeness verification
@@ -109,7 +153,7 @@ EXPECTED:
 - Red-Green-Refactor cycle validation
 - Best practices adherence assessment
 RULES: Focus on TDD best practices and workflow adherence. Be specific about violations and improvements.
-" > .workflow/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd project-root > .workflow/active/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
 ```
 
 **Output**: TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
@@ -121,14 +165,14 @@ RULES: Focus on TDD best practices and workflow adherence. Be specific about vio
 TDD Verification Report - Session: {sessionId}
 
 ## Chain Validation
-✅ Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1 (Complete)
-✅ Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1 (Complete)
-⚠️  Feature 3: TEST-3.1 → IMPL-3.1 (Missing REFACTOR phase)
+[COMPLETE] Feature 1: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1 (Complete)
+[COMPLETE] Feature 2: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 → REFACTOR-2.1 (Complete)
+[INCOMPLETE] Feature 3: TEST-3.1 → IMPL-3.1 (Missing REFACTOR phase)
 
 ## Test Execution
-✅ All TEST tasks produced failing tests
-✅ All IMPL tasks made tests pass
-✅ All REFACTOR tasks maintained green tests
+All TEST tasks produced failing tests
+All IMPL tasks made tests pass
+All REFACTOR tasks maintained green tests
 
 ## Coverage Metrics
 Line Coverage: {percentage}%
@@ -137,7 +181,7 @@ Function Coverage: {percentage}%
 
 ## Compliance Score: {score}/100
 
-Detailed report: .workflow/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+Detailed report: .workflow/active/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
 
 Recommendations:
 - Complete missing REFACTOR-3.1 task
@@ -171,7 +215,7 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 
 ### Chain Validation Algorithm
 ```
-1. Load all task JSONs from .workflow/{sessionId}/.task/
+1. Load all task JSONs from .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/
 2. Extract task IDs and group by feature number
 3. For each feature:
    - Check TEST-N.M exists
@@ -205,7 +249,7 @@ Final Score: Max(0, Base Score - Deductions)
 
 ## Output Files
 ```
-.workflow/{session-id}/
+.workflow/active/{session-id}/
 ├── TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md     # Comprehensive compliance report ⭐
 └── .process/
     ├── test-results.json         # From tdd-coverage-analysis
@@ -218,8 +262,8 @@ Final Score: Max(0, Base Score - Deductions)
 ### Session Discovery Errors
 | Error | Cause | Resolution |
 |-------|-------|------------|
-| No active session | No .active-* file | Provide session-id explicitly |
-| Multiple active sessions | Multiple .active-* files | Provide session-id explicitly |
+| No active session | No WFS-* directories | Provide session-id explicitly |
+| Multiple active sessions | Multiple WFS-* directories | Provide session-id explicitly |
 | Session not found | Invalid session-id | Check available sessions |
 
 ### Validation Errors
@@ -240,7 +284,7 @@ Final Score: Max(0, Base Score - Deductions)
 
 ### Command Chain
 - **Called After**: `/workflow:execute` (when TDD tasks completed)
-- **Calls**: `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis`, Gemini wrapper
+- **Calls**: `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis`, Gemini CLI
 - **Related**: `/workflow:tdd-plan`, `/workflow:status`
 
 ### Basic Usage
@@ -274,20 +318,20 @@ Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
 ## Chain Analysis
 
 ### Feature 1: {Feature Name}
-**Status**: ✅ Complete
+**Status**: Complete
 **Chain**: TEST-1.1 → IMPL-1.1 → REFACTOR-1.1
 
-- ✅ **Red Phase**: Test created and failed with clear message
-- ✅ **Green Phase**: Minimal implementation made test pass
-- ✅ **Refactor Phase**: Code improved, tests remained green
+- **Red Phase**: Test created and failed with clear message
+- **Green Phase**: Minimal implementation made test pass
+- **Refactor Phase**: Code improved, tests remained green
 
 ### Feature 2: {Feature Name}
-**Status**: ⚠️ Incomplete
+**Status**: Incomplete
 **Chain**: TEST-2.1 → IMPL-2.1 (Missing REFACTOR-2.1)
 
-- ✅ **Red Phase**: Test created and failed
-- ⚠️ **Green Phase**: Implementation seems over-engineered
-- ❌ **Refactor Phase**: Missing
+- **Red Phase**: Test created and failed
+- **Green Phase**: Implementation seems over-engineered
+- **Refactor Phase**: Missing
 
 **Issues**:
 - REFACTOR-2.1 task not completed
@@ -309,16 +353,16 @@ Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
 ## TDD Cycle Validation
 
 ### Red Phase (Write Failing Test)
-- ✅ {N}/{total} features had failing tests initially
-- ⚠️ Feature 3: No evidence of initial test failure
+- {N}/{total} features had failing tests initially
+- Feature 3: No evidence of initial test failure
 
 ### Green Phase (Make Test Pass)
-- ✅ {N}/{total} implementations made tests pass
-- ✅ All implementations minimal and focused
+- {N}/{total} implementations made tests pass
+- All implementations minimal and focused
 
 ### Refactor Phase (Improve Quality)
-- ⚠️ {N}/{total} features completed refactoring
-- ❌ Feature 2, 4: Refactoring step skipped
+- {N}/{total} features completed refactoring
+- Feature 2, 4: Refactoring step skipped
 
 ## Best Practices Assessment
 
@@ -354,8 +398,3 @@ Status: {EXCELLENT | GOOD | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | FAILED}
 {Summary of compliance status and next steps}
 ```
 
-## Related Commands
-- `/workflow:tdd-plan` - Creates TDD workflow
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes TDD tasks
-- `/workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis` - Analyzes test coverage
-- `/workflow:status` - Views workflow progress

.claude/commands/workflow/test-cycle-execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,500 @@
+---
+name: test-cycle-execute
+description: Execute test-fix workflow with dynamic task generation and iterative fix cycles until test pass rate >= 95% or max iterations reached. Uses @cli-planning-agent for failure analysis and task generation.
+argument-hint: "[--resume-session=\"session-id\"] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Test-Cycle-Execute Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Execute test-fix workflow (auto-discovers active session)
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute
+
+# Resume interrupted session
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute --resume-session="WFS-test-user-auth"
+
+# Custom iteration limit (default: 10)
+/workflow:test-cycle-execute --max-iterations=15
+```
+
+**Quality Gate**: Test pass rate >= 95% (criticality-aware) or 100%
+**Max Iterations**: 10 (default, adjustable)
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Dynamic test-fix orchestrator with **adaptive task generation** based on runtime analysis.
+
+**vs Standard Execute**:
+- **Standard**: Pre-defined tasks → Execute sequentially → Done
+- **Test-Cycle**: Initial tasks → **Test → Analyze failures → Generate fix tasks → Fix → Re-test** → Repeat until pass
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Automatic Problem Solving**: No manual intervention needed until 95% pass rate
+2. **Intelligent Adaptation**: Strategy adjusts based on progress (conservative → aggressive → surgical)
+3. **Fast Feedback**: Progressive testing runs only affected tests (70-90% faster)
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** handling test failures - always delegate here
+- Manages: iteration loop, strategy selection, pass rate validation
+- Delegates: CLI analysis to @cli-planning-agent, execution to @test-fix-agent
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow 
+
+```
+1. Discovery
+   └─ Load session, tasks, iteration state
+
+2. Main Loop (for each task):
+   ├─ Execute → Test → Calculate pass_rate
+   ├─ Decision:
+   │  ├─ 100% → SUCCESS: Next task
+   │  ├─ 95-99% + low criticality → PARTIAL SUCCESS: Approve with note
+   │  └─ <95% or critical failures → Fix Loop ↓
+   └─ Fix Loop:
+      ├─ Detect: stuck tests, regression, progress trend
+      ├─ Select strategy: conservative/aggressive/surgical
+      ├─ Generate fix task via @cli-planning-agent (IMPL-fix-N.json)
+      ├─ Execute fix via @test-fix-agent
+      └─ Re-test → Back to step 2
+
+3. Completion
+   └─ Final validation → Generate summary → Auto-complete session
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Loop control, strategy selection, pass rate calculation, threshold decisions |
+| **@cli-planning-agent** | CLI analysis (Gemini/Qwen/Codex), root cause extraction, task generation, affected test detection |
+| **@test-fix-agent** | Test execution, code fixes, criticality assignment, result reporting |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Intelligent Strategy Engine
+
+**Auto-selects optimal strategy based on iteration context:**
+
+| Strategy | Trigger | Behavior |
+|----------|---------|----------|
+| **Conservative** | Iteration 1-2 (default) | Single targeted fix, full validation |
+| **Aggressive** | Pass rate >80% + similar failures | Batch fix related issues |
+| **Surgical** | Regression detected (pass rate drops >10%) | Minimal changes, rollback focus |
+
+**Selection Logic** (in orchestrator):
+```javascript
+if (iteration <= 2) return "conservative";
+if (passRate > 80 && failurePattern.similarity > 0.7) return "aggressive";
+if (regressionDetected) return "surgical";
+return "conservative";
+```
+
+**Integration**: Strategy passed to @cli-planning-agent in prompt for tailored analysis.
+
+### 2. Progressive Testing
+
+**Runs affected tests during iterations, full suite only for final validation.**
+
+**How It Works**:
+1. @cli-planning-agent analyzes fix_strategy.modification_points
+2. Maps modified files to test files (via imports + integration patterns)
+3. Returns `affected_tests[]` in task JSON
+4. @test-fix-agent runs: `npm test -- ${affected_tests.join(' ')}`
+5. Final validation: `npm test` (full suite)
+
+
+**Benefits**: 70-90% iteration speed improvement, instant feedback on fix effectiveness.
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+- Session discovery, task queue management
+- Pass rate calculation: `(passed / total) * 100` from test-results.json
+- Criticality assessment (high/medium/low)
+- Strategy selection based on context
+- **Runtime Calculations** (from iteration-state.json):
+  - Current iteration: `iterations.length + 1`
+  - Stuck tests: Tests appearing in `failed_tests` for 3+ consecutive iterations
+  - Regression: Compare consecutive `pass_rate` values (>10% drop)
+  - Max iterations: Read from `task.meta.max_iterations`
+- Iteration control (max 10, default)
+- CLI tool fallback chain: Gemini → Qwen → Codex
+- TodoWrite progress tracking
+- Session auto-complete (pass rate >= 95%)
+
+### @cli-planning-agent
+- Execute CLI analysis with bug diagnosis template
+- Parse output for root causes and fix strategy
+- Generate IMPL-fix-N.json task definition
+- Detect affected tests for progressive testing
+- Save: analysis.md, cli-output.txt
+
+### @test-fix-agent
+- Execute tests, save results to test-results.json
+- Apply fixes from task.context.fix_strategy
+- Assign criticality to failures
+- Update task status
+
+## Reference
+
+### CLI Tool Configuration
+
+**Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex
+**Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`
+**Timeout**: 40min (2400000ms)
+
+**Tool Details**:
+1. **Gemini** (primary): `gemini-2.5-pro`
+2. **Qwen** (fallback): `coder-model`
+3. **Codex** (fallback): `gpt-5.1-codex`
+
+**When to Fallback**: HTTP 429, timeout, analysis quality degraded
+
+### Session File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-test-{session}/
+├── workflow-session.json           # Session metadata
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+│   ├── IMPL-{001,002}.json         # Initial tasks
+│   └── IMPL-fix-{N}.json           # Generated fix tasks
+├── .process/
+│   ├── iteration-state.json        # Current iteration + strategy + stuck tests
+│   ├── test-results.json           # Latest results (pass_rate, criticality)
+│   ├── test-output.log             # Full test output
+│   ├── fix-history.json            # All fix attempts
+│   ├── iteration-{N}-analysis.md   # CLI analysis report
+│   └── iteration-{N}-cli-output.txt
+└── .summaries/iteration-summaries/
+```
+
+### Iteration State JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Persisted state machine for iteration loop - enables Resume and historical analysis.
+
+```json
+{
+  "current_task": "IMPL-002",
+  "selected_strategy": "aggressive",
+  "next_action": "execute_fix_task",
+  "iterations": [
+    {
+      "iteration": 1,
+      "pass_rate": 70,
+      "strategy": "conservative",
+      "failed_tests": ["test_auth_flow", "test_user_permissions"]
+    },
+    {
+      "iteration": 2,
+      "pass_rate": 82,
+      "strategy": "conservative",
+      "failed_tests": ["test_user_permissions", "test_token_expiry"]
+    },
+    {
+      "iteration": 3,
+      "pass_rate": 89,
+      "strategy": "aggressive",
+      "failed_tests": ["test_auth_edge_case"]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Field Descriptions**:
+- `current_task`: Pointer to active task (essential for Resume)
+- `selected_strategy`: Current iteration strategy (runtime state)
+- `next_action`: State machine next step (`execute_fix_task` | `retest` | `complete`)
+- `iterations[]`: Historical log of all iterations (source of truth for trends)
+
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**@cli-planning-agent** (failure analysis):
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Analyze test failures (iteration ${N}) - ${strategy} strategy`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Analyze test failures and generate fix task JSON for iteration ${N}
+
+    ## Strategy
+    ${selectedStrategy} - ${strategyDescription}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
+    1. Read test results: ${session.test_results_path}
+    2. Read test output: ${session.test_output_path}
+    3. Read iteration state: ${session.iteration_state_path}
+
+    ## Context Metadata (Orchestrator-Calculated)
+    - Session ID: ${sessionId} (from file path)
+    - Current Iteration: ${N} (= iterations.length + 1)
+    - Max Iterations: ${maxIterations} (from task.meta.max_iterations)
+    - Current Pass Rate: ${passRate}%
+    - Selected Strategy: ${selectedStrategy} (from iteration-state.json)
+    - Stuck Tests: ${stuckTests} (calculated from iterations[].failed_tests history)
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini & codex
+    - Template: 01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+    - Timeout: 2400000ms
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+    1. Task JSON: ${session.task_dir}/IMPL-fix-${N}.json
+       - Must include: fix_strategy.test_execution.affected_tests[]
+       - Must include: fix_strategy.confidence_score
+    2. Analysis report: ${session.process_dir}/iteration-${N}-analysis.md
+    3. CLI output: ${session.process_dir}/iteration-${N}-cli-output.txt
+
+    ## Strategy-Specific Requirements
+    - Conservative: Single targeted fix, high confidence required
+    - Aggressive: Batch fix similar failures, pattern-based approach
+    - Surgical: Minimal changes, focus on rollback safety
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - Concrete fix strategy with modification points (file:function:lines)
+    - Affected tests list for progressive testing
+    - Root cause analysis (not just symptoms)
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**@test-fix-agent** (execution):
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="test-fix-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Execute ${task.meta.type}: ${task.title}`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    ${taskTypeObjective[task.meta.type]}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
+    1. Read task JSON: ${session.task_json_path}
+    2. Read iteration state: ${session.iteration_state_path}
+    3. ${taskTypeSpecificReads[task.meta.type]}
+
+    ## CRITICAL: Syntax Check Priority
+    **Before any code modification or test execution:**
+    - Run project syntax checker (TypeScript: tsc --noEmit, ESLint, etc.)
+    - Verify zero syntax errors before proceeding
+    - If syntax errors found: Fix immediately before other work
+    - Syntax validation is MANDATORY gate - no exceptions
+
+    ## Session Paths
+    - Workflow Dir: ${session.workflow_dir}
+    - Task JSON: ${session.task_json_path}
+    - Test Results Output: ${session.test_results_path}
+    - Test Output Log: ${session.test_output_path}
+    - Iteration State: ${session.iteration_state_path}
+
+    ## Task Type: ${task.meta.type}
+    ${taskTypeGuidance[task.meta.type]}
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+    ${taskTypeDeliverables[task.meta.type]}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - ${taskTypeSuccessCriteria[task.meta.type]}
+    - Update task status in task JSON
+    - Save all outputs to specified paths
+    - Report completion to orchestrator
+  `
+)
+
+// Task Type Configurations
+const taskTypeObjective = {
+  "test-gen": "Generate comprehensive tests based on requirements",
+  "test-fix": "Execute test suite and report results with criticality assessment",
+  "test-fix-iteration": "Apply fixes from strategy and validate with tests"
+};
+
+const taskTypeSpecificReads = {
+  "test-gen": "Read test context: ${session.test_context_path}",
+  "test-fix": "Read previous results (if exists): ${session.test_results_path}",
+  "test-fix-iteration": "Read fix strategy: ${session.analysis_path}, fix history: ${session.fix_history_path}"
+};
+
+const taskTypeGuidance = {
+  "test-gen": `
+    - Review task.context.requirements for test scenarios
+    - Analyze codebase to understand implementation
+    - Generate tests covering: happy paths, edge cases, error handling
+    - Follow existing test patterns and framework conventions
+  `,
+  "test-fix": `
+    - Run test command from task.context or project config
+    - Capture: pass/fail counts, error messages, stack traces
+    - Assess criticality for each failure:
+      * high: core functionality broken, security issues
+      * medium: feature degradation, data integrity issues
+      * low: edge cases, flaky tests, env-specific issues
+    - Save structured results to test-results.json
+  `,
+  "test-fix-iteration": `
+    - Load fix_strategy from task.context.fix_strategy
+    - Identify modification_points: ${task.context.fix_strategy.modification_points}
+    - Apply surgical fixes (minimal changes)
+    - Test execution mode: ${task.context.fix_strategy.test_execution.mode}
+      * affected_only: Run ${task.context.fix_strategy.test_execution.affected_tests}
+      * full_suite: Run complete test suite
+    - If failures persist: Document in test-results.json, DO NOT analyze (orchestrator handles)
+  `
+};
+
+const taskTypeDeliverables = {
+  "test-gen": "- Test files in target directories\n    - Test coverage report\n    - Summary in .summaries/",
+  "test-fix": "- test-results.json (pass_rate, criticality, failures)\n    - test-output.log (full test output)\n    - Summary in .summaries/",
+  "test-fix-iteration": "- Modified source files\n    - test-results.json (updated pass_rate)\n    - test-output.log\n    - Summary in .summaries/"
+};
+
+const taskTypeSuccessCriteria = {
+  "test-gen": "All test files created, executable without errors, coverage documented",
+  "test-fix": "Test results saved with accurate pass_rate and criticality, all failures documented",
+  "test-fix-iteration": "Fixes applied per strategy, tests executed, results reported (pass/fail to orchestrator)"
+};
+```
+
+### Completion Conditions
+
+**Full Success**:
+- All tasks completed
+- Pass rate === 100%
+- Action: Auto-complete session
+
+**Partial Success**:
+- All tasks completed
+- Pass rate >= 95% and < 100%
+- All failures are "low" criticality
+- Action: Auto-approve with review note
+
+**Failure**:
+- Max iterations (10) reached without 95% pass rate
+- Pass rate < 95% after max iterations
+- Action: Generate failure report, mark blocked, return to user
+
+### Error Handling
+
+| Scenario | Action |
+|----------|--------|
+| Test execution error | Log, retry with error context |
+| CLI analysis failure | Fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → manual |
+| Agent execution error | Save state, retry with simplified context |
+| Max iterations reached | Generate failure report, mark blocked |
+| Regression detected | Rollback last fix, switch to surgical strategy |
+| Stuck tests detected | Continue with alternative strategy, document in failure report |
+
+**CLI Fallback Triggers** (Gemini → Qwen → Codex → manual):
+
+Fallback is triggered when any of these conditions occur:
+
+1. **Invalid Output**:
+   - CLI tool fails to generate valid `IMPL-fix-N.json` (JSON parse error)
+   - Missing required fields: `fix_strategy.modification_points` or `fix_strategy.affected_tests`
+
+2. **Low Confidence**:
+   - `fix_strategy.confidence_score < 0.4` (indicates uncertain analysis)
+
+3. **Technical Failures**:
+   - HTTP 429 (rate limit) or 5xx errors
+   - Timeout (exceeds 2400000ms / 40min)
+   - Connection errors
+
+4. **Quality Degradation**:
+   - Analysis report < 100 words (too brief, likely incomplete)
+   - No concrete modification points provided (only general suggestions)
+   - Same root cause identified 3+ consecutive times (stuck analysis)
+
+**Fallback Sequence**:
+- Try primary tool (Gemini)
+- If trigger detected → Try fallback (Qwen)
+- If trigger detected again → Try final fallback (Codex)
+- If all fail → Mark as degraded, use basic pattern matching from fix-history.json, notify user
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-001: Generate tests [code-developer]",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Executing test generation"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "Execute IMPL-002: Test & Fix Cycle [ITERATION]",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Running test-fix iteration cycle"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "  → Iteration 1: Initial test (pass: 70%, conservative)",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Running initial tests"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "  → Iteration 2: Fix validation (pass: 82%, conservative)",
+      status: "completed",
+      activeForm: "Fixing validation issues"
+    },
+    {
+      content: "  → Iteration 3: Batch fix auth (pass: 89%, aggressive)",
+      status: "in_progress",
+      activeForm: "Fixing authentication issues"
+    }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**Update Rules**:
+- Add iteration item with: strategy, pass rate
+- Mark completed after each iteration
+- Update parent task when all complete
+
+## Commit Strategy
+
+**Automatic Commits** (orchestrator-managed):
+
+The orchestrator automatically creates git commits at key checkpoints to enable safe rollback:
+
+1. **After Successful Iteration** (pass rate increased):
+   ```bash
+   git add .
+   git commit -m "test-cycle: iteration ${N} - ${strategy} strategy (pass: ${oldRate}% → ${newRate}%)"
+   ```
+
+2. **Before Rollback** (regression detected):
+   ```bash
+   # Current state preserved, then:
+   git revert HEAD
+   git commit -m "test-cycle: rollback iteration ${N} - regression detected (pass: ${newRate}% < ${oldRate}%)"
+   ```
+
+**Commit Content**:
+- Modified source files from fix application
+- Updated test-results.json, iteration-state.json
+- Excludes: temporary files, logs
+
+**Benefits**:
+- **Rollback Safety**: Each iteration is a revert point
+- **Progress Tracking**: Git history shows iteration evolution
+- **Audit Trail**: Clear record of which strategy/iteration caused issues
+- **Resume Capability**: Can resume from any checkpoint
+
+**Note**: Final session completion creates additional commit with full summary.
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Default Settings Work**: 10 iterations sufficient for most cases
+2. **Automatic Commits**: Orchestrator commits after each successful iteration - no manual intervention needed
+3. **Trust Strategy Engine**: Auto-selection based on proven heuristics
+4. **Monitor Logs**: Check `.process/iteration-N-analysis.md` for CLI analysis insights
+5. **Progressive Testing**: Saves 70-90% iteration time automatically

.claude/commands/workflow/test-fix-gen.md

@@ -0,0 +1,699 @@
+---
+name: test-fix-gen
+description: Create test-fix workflow session from session ID, description, or file path with test strategy generation and task planning
+argument-hint: "(source-session-id | \"feature description\" | /path/to/file.md)"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Test-Fix Generation Command (/workflow:test-fix-gen)
+
+## Overview
+
+### What It Does
+
+This command creates an independent test-fix workflow session for existing code. It orchestrates a 5-phase process to analyze implementation, generate test requirements, and create executable test generation and fix tasks.
+
+**CRITICAL - Command Scope**:
+- **This command ONLY generates task JSON files** (IMPL-001.json, IMPL-002.json)
+- **Does NOT execute tests or apply fixes** - all execution happens in separate orchestrator
+- **Must call `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`** after this command to actually run tests and fixes
+- **Test failure handling happens in test-cycle-execute**, not here
+
+### Dual-Mode Support
+
+**Automatic mode detection** based on input pattern:
+
+| Mode | Input Pattern | Context Source | Use Case |
+|------|--------------|----------------|----------|
+| **Session Mode** | `WFS-xxx` | Source session summaries | Test validation for completed workflow |
+| **Prompt Mode** | Text or file path | Direct codebase analysis | Test generation from description |
+
+**Detection Logic**:
+```bash
+if [[ "$input" == WFS-* ]]; then
+  MODE="session"  # Use test-context-gather
+else
+  MODE="prompt"   # Use context-gather
+fi
+```
+
+### Core Principles
+
+- **Dual Input Support**: Accepts session ID (WFS-xxx) or feature description/file path
+- **Session Isolation**: Creates independent `WFS-test-[slug]` session
+- **Context-First**: Gathers implementation context via appropriate method
+- **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` tasks with `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description
+- **Automatic Detection**: Input pattern determines execution mode
+
+### Coordinator Role
+
+This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
+- Does NOT analyze code directly
+- Does NOT generate tests or documentation
+- Does NOT execute tests or apply fixes
+- Does NOT handle test failures or iterations
+- ONLY coordinates slash commands to generate task JSON files
+- Parses outputs to pass data between phases
+- Creates independent test workflow session
+- **All execution delegated to `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`**
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand dispatch **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When dispatching a sub-command (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
+
+---
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+
+```bash
+# Basic syntax
+/workflow:test-fix-gen <INPUT>
+
+# Input
+<INPUT>            # Session ID, description, or file path
+```
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from the task description. To request CLI execution, include it in your description (e.g., "use Codex for automated fixes").
+
+### Usage Examples
+
+#### Session Mode
+```bash
+# Test validation for completed implementation
+/workflow:test-fix-gen WFS-user-auth-v2
+
+# With semantic CLI request
+/workflow:test-fix-gen WFS-api-endpoints  # Add "use Codex" in description for automated fixes
+```
+
+#### Prompt Mode - Text Description
+```bash
+# Generate tests from feature description
+/workflow:test-fix-gen "Test the user authentication API endpoints in src/auth/api.ts"
+
+# With CLI execution (semantic)
+/workflow:test-fix-gen "Test user registration and login flows, use Codex for automated fixes"
+```
+
+#### Prompt Mode - File Reference
+```bash
+# Generate tests from requirements file
+/workflow:test-fix-gen ./docs/api-requirements.md
+```
+
+### Mode Comparison
+
+| Aspect | Session Mode | Prompt Mode |
+|--------|-------------|-------------|
+| **Phase 1** | Create `WFS-test-[source]` with `source_session_id` | Create `WFS-test-[slug]` without `source_session_id` |
+| **Phase 2** | `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` | `/workflow:tools:context-gather` |
+| **Phase 3-5** | Identical | Identical |
+| **Context** | Source session summaries + artifacts | Direct codebase analysis |
+
+---
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Core Execution Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite, second is dispatch Phase 1 session creation
+2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
+3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase for next phase
+4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 5 completes
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
+7. **Automatic Detection**: Mode auto-detected from input pattern
+8. **Semantic CLI Detection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description for Phase 4
+9. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+10. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
+
+### 5-Phase Execution
+
+#### Phase 1: Create Test Session
+
+**Step 1.0: Load Source Session Intent (Session Mode Only)** - Preserve user's original task description for semantic CLI selection
+
+```javascript
+// Session Mode: Read source session metadata to get original task description
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/workflow-session.json")
+// OR if context-package exists:
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/.process/context-package.json")
+
+// Extract: metadata.task_description or project/description field
+// This preserves user's CLI tool preferences (e.g., "use Codex for fixes")
+```
+
+**Step 1.1: Dispatch** - Create test workflow session with preserved intent
+
+```javascript
+// Session Mode - Include original task description to enable semantic CLI selection
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type test --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]: [originalTaskDescription]\"")
+
+// Prompt Mode - User's description already contains their intent
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type test --new \"Test generation for: [description]\"")
+```
+
+**Input**: User argument (session ID, description, or file path)
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Creates new session: `WFS-test-[slug]`
+- Writes `workflow-session.json` metadata with `type: "test"`
+  - **Session Mode**: Additionally includes `source_session_id: "[sourceId]"`, description with original user intent
+  - **Prompt Mode**: Uses user's description (already contains intent)
+- Returns new session ID
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: `testSessionId` (pattern: `WFS-test-[slug]`)
+
+**Validation**:
+- **Session Mode**: Source session exists with completed IMPL tasks
+- **Both Modes**: New test session directory created with metadata
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
+
+**Step 2.1: Dispatch** - Gather test context via appropriate method
+
+```javascript
+// Session Mode
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")
+
+// Prompt Mode
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [testSessionId] \"[task_description]\"")
+```
+
+**Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- **Session Mode**:
+  - Load source session implementation context and summaries
+  - Analyze test coverage using MCP tools
+  - Identify files requiring tests
+- **Prompt Mode**:
+  - Analyze codebase based on description
+  - Identify relevant files and dependencies
+- Detect test framework and conventions
+- Generate context package JSON
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Extract: `contextPath` (pattern: `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/[test-]context-package.json`)
+
+**Validation**:
+- Context package created with coverage analysis
+- Test framework detected
+- Test conventions documented
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
+
+**Step 3.1: Dispatch** - Generate test requirements using Gemini
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [contextPath]")
+```
+
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+- `contextPath` from Phase 2
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Use Gemini to analyze coverage gaps and implementation
+- Study existing test patterns and conventions
+- Generate **multi-layered test requirements** (L0: Static Analysis, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+- Design test generation strategy with quality assurance criteria
+- Generate `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` with structured test layers
+
+**Enhanced Test Requirements**:
+For each targeted file/function, Gemini MUST generate:
+1. **L0: Static Analysis Requirements**:
+   - Linting rules to enforce (ESLint, Prettier)
+   - Type checking requirements (TypeScript)
+   - Anti-pattern detection rules
+2. **L1: Unit Test Requirements**:
+   - Happy path scenarios (valid inputs → expected outputs)
+   - Negative path scenarios (invalid inputs → error handling)
+   - Edge cases (null, undefined, 0, empty strings/arrays)
+3. **L2: Integration Test Requirements**:
+   - Successful component interactions
+   - Failure handling scenarios (service unavailable, timeout)
+4. **L3: E2E Test Requirements** (if applicable):
+   - Key user journeys from start to finish
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` created
+
+**Validation**:
+- TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md exists with complete sections:
+  - Coverage Assessment
+  - Test Framework & Conventions
+  - **Multi-Layered Test Plan** (NEW):
+    - L0: Static Analysis Plan
+    - L1: Unit Test Plan
+    - L2: Integration Test Plan
+    - L3: E2E Test Plan (if applicable)
+  - Test Requirements by File (with layer annotations)
+  - Test Generation Strategy
+  - Implementation Targets
+  - Quality Assurance Criteria (NEW):
+    - Minimum coverage thresholds
+    - Required test types per function
+    - Acceptance criteria for test quality
+  - Success Criteria
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
+
+**Step 4.1: Dispatch** - Generate test task JSONs
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session [testSessionId]")
+```
+
+**Input**:
+- `testSessionId` from Phase 1
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description.
+
+**Expected Behavior**:
+- Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3 (multi-layered test plan)
+- Generate **minimum 3 task JSON files** (expandable based on complexity):
+  - **IMPL-001.json**: Test Understanding & Generation (`@code-developer`)
+  - **IMPL-001.5-review.json**: Test Quality Gate (`@test-fix-agent`) ← **NEW**
+  - **IMPL-002.json**: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (`@test-fix-agent`)
+  - **IMPL-003+**: Additional tasks if needed for complex projects
+- Generate `IMPL_PLAN.md` with multi-layered test strategy
+- Generate `TODO_LIST.md` with task checklist
+
+**Parse Output**:
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.json` exists
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-001.5-review.json` exists ← **NEW**
+- Verify `.workflow/[testSessionId]/.task/IMPL-002.json` exists
+- Verify additional `.task/IMPL-*.json` if applicable
+- Verify `IMPL_PLAN.md` and `TODO_LIST.md` created
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed, phase 5 in_progress
+
+---
+
+#### Phase 5: Return Summary
+
+**Return to User**:
+```
+Independent test-fix workflow created successfully!
+
+Input: [original input]
+Mode: [Session|Prompt]
+Test Session: [testSessionId]
+
+Tasks Created:
+- IMPL-001: Test Understanding & Generation (@code-developer)
+- IMPL-001.5: Test Quality Gate - Static Analysis & Coverage (@test-fix-agent) ← NEW
+- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
+[- IMPL-003+: Additional tasks if applicable]
+
+Test Strategy: Multi-Layered (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+Test Framework: [detected framework]
+Test Files to Generate: [count]
+Quality Thresholds:
+- Minimum Coverage: 80%
+- Static Analysis: Zero critical issues
+Max Fix Iterations: 5
+Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated]
+
+Review artifacts:
+- Test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+- Task list: .workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
+
+CRITICAL - Next Steps:
+1. Review IMPL_PLAN.md (now includes multi-layered test strategy)
+2. **MUST execute: /workflow:test-cycle-execute**
+   - This command only generated task JSON files
+   - Test execution and fix iterations happen in test-cycle-execute
+   - Do NOT attempt to run tests or fixes in main workflow
+3. IMPL-001.5 will validate test quality before fix cycle begins
+```
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
+
+**BOUNDARY NOTE**:
+- Command completes here - only task JSON files generated
+- All test execution, failure detection, CLI analysis, fix generation happens in `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`
+- This command does NOT handle test failures or apply fixes
+
+---
+
+### TodoWrite Pattern
+
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for test-fix-gen workflow with dual-mode support (Session Mode and Prompt Mode).
+
+#### Initial TodoWrite Structure
+
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Create Test Session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Gather Test Context", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Gathering test context"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: Return Summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing"}
+]
+```
+
+#### Key Principles
+
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand dispatched):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Example - Phase 2 with sub-tasks:
+   ```json
+   [
+     {"content": "Phase 1: Create Test Session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+     {"content": "Phase 2: Gather Test Context", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering test context"},
+     {"content": "  → Load context and analyze coverage", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading context"},
+     {"content": "  → Detect test framework and conventions", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Detecting framework"},
+     {"content": "  → Generate context package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context"},
+     {"content": "Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test generation"},
+     {"content": "Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+     {"content": "Phase 5: Return Summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing"}
+   ]
+   ```
+
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example - Phase 2 completed:
+   ```json
+   [
+     {"content": "Phase 1: Create Test Session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+     {"content": "Phase 2: Gather Test Context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test context"},
+     {"content": "Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing test generation"},
+     {"content": "Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+     {"content": "Phase 5: Return Summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing"}
+   ]
+   ```
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase dispatched (tasks ATTACHED with mode-specific context gathering) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+#### Test-Fix-Gen Specific Features
+
+- **Dual-Mode Support**: Automatic mode detection based on input pattern
+  - **Session Mode**: Input pattern `WFS-*` → uses `test-context-gather` for cross-session context
+  - **Prompt Mode**: Text or file path → uses `context-gather` for direct codebase analysis
+- **Phase 2**: Mode-specific context gathering (session summaries vs codebase analysis)
+- **Phase 3**: Multi-layered test requirements analysis (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+- **Phase 4**: Multi-task generation with quality gate (IMPL-001, IMPL-001.5-review, IMPL-002)
+- **Fix Mode Configuration**: CLI tool usage determined semantically from user's task description
+
+
+---
+
+## Task Specifications
+
+Generates minimum 3 tasks (expandable for complex projects):
+
+### IMPL-001: Test Understanding & Generation
+
+**Agent**: `@code-developer`
+
+**Purpose**: Understand source implementation and generate test files following multi-layered test strategy
+
+**Task Configuration**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-001`
+- `meta.type: "test-gen"`
+- `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+- `context.requirements`: Understand source implementation and generate tests across all layers (L0-L3)
+- `flow_control.target_files`: Test files to create from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md section 5
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. **Understand Phase**:
+   - Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md and test context
+   - Understand source code implementation patterns
+   - Analyze multi-layered test requirements (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
+   - Identify test scenarios, edge cases, and error paths
+2. **Generation Phase**:
+   - Generate L1 unit test files following existing patterns
+   - Generate L2 integration test files (if applicable)
+   - Generate L3 E2E test files (if applicable)
+   - Ensure test coverage aligns with multi-layered requirements
+   - Include both positive and negative test cases
+3. **Verification Phase**:
+   - Verify test completeness and correctness
+   - Ensure each test has meaningful assertions
+   - Check for test anti-patterns (tests without assertions, overly broad mocks)
+
+### IMPL-001.5: Test Quality Gate ← **NEW**
+
+**Agent**: `@test-fix-agent`
+
+**Purpose**: Validate test quality before entering fix cycle - prevent "hollow tests" from becoming the source of truth
+
+**Task Configuration**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-001.5-review`
+- `meta.type: "test-quality-review"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `context.requirements`: Validate generated tests meet quality standards
+- `context.quality_config`: Load from `.claude/workflows/test-quality-config.json`
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. **L0: Static Analysis**:
+   - Run linting on test files (ESLint, Prettier)
+   - Check for test anti-patterns:
+     - Tests without assertions (`expect()` missing)
+     - Empty test bodies (`it('should...', () => {})`)
+     - Disabled tests without justification (`it.skip`, `xit`)
+   - Verify TypeScript type safety (if applicable)
+2. **Coverage Analysis**:
+   - Run coverage analysis on generated tests
+   - Calculate coverage percentage for target source files
+   - Identify uncovered branches and edge cases
+3. **Test Quality Metrics**:
+   - Verify minimum coverage threshold met (default: 80%)
+   - Verify all critical functions have negative test cases
+   - Verify integration tests cover key component interactions
+4. **Quality Gate Decision**:
+   - **PASS**: Coverage ≥ 80%, zero critical anti-patterns → Proceed to IMPL-002
+   - **FAIL**: Coverage < 80% OR critical anti-patterns found → Loop back to IMPL-001 with feedback
+
+**Acceptance Criteria**:
+- Static analysis: Zero critical issues
+- Test coverage: ≥ 80% for target files
+- Test completeness: All targeted functions have unit tests
+- Negative test coverage: Each public API has at least one error handling test
+- Integration coverage: Key component interactions have integration tests (if applicable)
+
+**Failure Handling**:
+If quality gate fails:
+1. Generate detailed feedback report (`.process/test-quality-report.md`)
+2. Update IMPL-001 task with specific improvement requirements
+3. Trigger IMPL-001 re-execution with enhanced context
+4. Maximum 2 quality gate retries before escalating to user
+
+### IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle
+
+**Agent**: `@test-fix-agent`
+
+**Purpose**: Execute initial tests and trigger orchestrator-managed fix cycles
+
+**Note**: This task executes tests and reports results. The test-cycle-execute orchestrator manages all fix iterations, CLI analysis, and fix task generation.
+
+**Task Configuration**:
+- Task ID: `IMPL-002`
+- `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
+
+**Test-Fix Cycle Specification**:
+**Note**: This specification describes what test-cycle-execute orchestrator will do. The agent only executes single tasks.
+- **Cycle Pattern** (orchestrator-managed): test → gemini_diagnose → fix (agent or CLI) → retest
+- **Tools Configuration** (orchestrator-controlled):
+  - Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
+  - Agent fix application (default) OR CLI if `command` field present in implementation_approach
+- **Exit Conditions** (orchestrator-enforced):
+  - Success: All tests pass
+  - Failure: Max iterations reached (5)
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+1. **Phase 1**: Initial test execution
+2. **Phase 2**: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes
+3. **Phase 3**: Final validation and certification
+
+### IMPL-003+: Additional Tasks (Optional)
+
+**Scenarios for Multiple Tasks**:
+- Large projects requiring per-module test generation
+- Separate integration vs unit test tasks
+- Specialized test types (performance, security, etc.)
+
+**Agent**: `@code-developer` or specialized agents based on requirements
+
+---
+
+## Artifacts & Output
+
+### Output Files Structure
+
+Created in `.workflow/active/WFS-test-[session]/`:
+
+```
+WFS-test-[session]/
+├── workflow-session.json          # Session metadata
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                   # Test generation and execution strategy
+├── TODO_LIST.md                   # Task checklist
+├── .task/
+│   ├── IMPL-001.json              # Test understanding & generation
+│   ├── IMPL-002.json              # Test execution & fix cycle
+│   └── IMPL-*.json                # Additional tasks (if applicable)
+└── .process/
+    ├── [test-]context-package.json # Context and coverage analysis
+    └── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md    # Test requirements and strategy
+```
+
+### Session Metadata
+
+**File**: `workflow-session.json`
+
+**Session Mode** includes:
+- `type: "test"` (set by session:start --type test)
+- `source_session_id: "[sourceSessionId]"` (enables automatic cross-session context)
+
+**Prompt Mode** includes:
+- `type: "test"` (set by session:start --type test)
+- No `source_session_id` field
+
+### Execution Flow Diagram
+
+```
+Test-Fix-Gen Workflow Orchestrator (Dual-Mode Support)
+│
+├─ Phase 1: Create Test Session
+│  ├─ Session Mode: /workflow:session:start --new (with source_session_id)
+│  └─ Prompt Mode: /workflow:session:start --new (without source_session_id)
+│     └─ Returns: testSessionId (WFS-test-[slug])
+│
+├─ Phase 2: Gather Context                                   ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  ├─ Session Mode: /workflow:tools:test-context-gather
+│  │  └─ Load source session summaries + analyze coverage
+│  └─ Prompt Mode: /workflow:tools:context-gather
+│     └─ Analyze codebase from description
+│     ├─ Phase 2.1: Load context and analyze coverage
+│     ├─ Phase 2.2: Detect test framework and conventions
+│     └─ Phase 2.3: Generate context package
+│     └─ Returns: [test-]context-package.json                ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis                         ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced
+│     ├─ Phase 3.1: Analyze coverage gaps with Gemini
+│     ├─ Phase 3.2: Study existing test patterns
+│     └─ Phase 3.3: Generate test generation strategy
+│     └─ Returns: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md                   ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks                              ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-task-generate
+│     ├─ Phase 4.1: Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+│     ├─ Phase 4.2: Generate task JSONs (IMPL-001, IMPL-002)
+│     └─ Phase 4.3: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
+│     └─ Returns: Task JSONs and plans                       ← COLLAPSED
+│
+└─ Phase 5: Return Summary
+   └─ Command ends, control returns to user
+
+Artifacts Created:
+├── .workflow/active/WFS-test-[session]/
+│   ├── workflow-session.json
+│   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+│   ├── TODO_LIST.md
+│   ├── .task/
+│   │   ├── IMPL-001.json (test understanding & generation)
+│   │   ├── IMPL-002.json (test execution & fix cycle)
+│   │   └── IMPL-003.json (optional: test review & certification)
+│   └── .process/
+│       ├── [test-]context-package.json
+│       └── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Key Points:
+• ← ATTACHED: SlashCommand attaches sub-tasks to orchestrator TodoWrite
+• ← COLLAPSED: Sub-tasks executed and collapsed to phase summary
+• Dual-Mode: Session Mode and Prompt Mode share same attachment pattern
+• Command Boundary: Execution delegated to /workflow:test-cycle-execute
+```
+
+---
+
+## Reference
+
+### Error Handling
+
+| Phase | Error Condition | Action |
+|-------|----------------|--------|
+| 1 | Source session not found (session mode) | Return error with source session ID |
+| 1 | No completed IMPL tasks (session mode) | Return error, source incomplete |
+| 2 | Context gathering failed | Return error, check source artifacts |
+| 3 | Gemini analysis failed | Return error, check context package |
+| 4 | Task generation failed | Retry once, then return error with details |
+
+### Best Practices
+
+1. **Before Running**:
+   - Ensure implementation is complete (session mode: check summaries exist)
+   - Commit all implementation changes
+   - Review source code quality
+
+2. **After Running**:
+   - Review generated `IMPL_PLAN.md` before execution
+   - Check `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` for completeness
+   - Verify task dependencies in `TODO_LIST.md`
+
+3. **During Execution**:
+   - Monitor iteration logs in `.process/fix-iteration-*`
+   - Track progress with `/workflow:status`
+   - Review Gemini diagnostic outputs
+
+4. **Mode Selection**:
+   - Use **Session Mode** for completed workflow validation
+   - Use **Prompt Mode** for ad-hoc test generation
+   - Include "use Codex" in description for autonomous fix application
+
+## Related Commands
+
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- `/workflow:plan` or `/workflow:execute` - Complete implementation session (for Session Mode)
+- None for Prompt Mode (ad-hoc test generation)
+
+**Called by This Command** (5 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create independent test workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (Session Mode): Gather source session context
+- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2 (Prompt Mode): Analyze codebase directly
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3: Generate test requirements using Gemini
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs (CLI tool usage determined semantically)
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:status` - Review generated test tasks
+- `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` - Execute test generation and iterative fix cycles
+- `/workflow:execute` - Standard execution of generated test tasks
+

.claude/commands/workflow/test-gen.md

@@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: test-gen
-description: Create independent test-fix workflow session by analyzing completed implementation
-usage: /workflow:test-gen [--use-codex] <source-session-id>
-argument-hint: "[--use-codex] <source-session-id>"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
-  - /workflow:test-gen --use-codex WFS-api-refactor
+description: Create independent test-fix workflow session from completed implementation session, analyzes code to generate test tasks
+argument-hint: "source-session-id"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -20,7 +16,20 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - **Context-First**: Prioritizes gathering code changes and summaries from source session
 - **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` task, using `meta.type: "test-fix"` for agent assignment
 - **Parameter Simplification**: Tools auto-detect test session type via metadata, no manual cross-session parameters needed
-- **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` flag for automated Codex fix application
+- **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage is determined by user's task description (e.g., "use Codex for fixes")
+
+**Task Attachment Model**:
+- SlashCommand dispatch **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is dispatched (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
+- After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
+- This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
+
+**Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
+- TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
+- When each phase finishes executing, automatically execute next pending phase
+- All phases run autonomously without user interaction
+- **⚠️ CONTINUOUS EXECUTION** - Do not stop until all phases complete
 
 **Execution Flow**:
 1. Initialize TodoWrite → Create test session → Parse session ID
@@ -28,29 +37,55 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 3. Analyze implementation with concept-enhanced → Parse ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
 4. Generate test task from analysis → Return summary
 
+**Command Scope**: This command ONLY prepares test workflow artifacts. It does NOT execute tests or implementation. Task execution requires separate user action.
+
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 test session creation
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files or analyze before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase for next phase
 4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
-5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 4 completes (execution triggered separately)
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after every phase completion
+5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 5 completes (summary returned)
+6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 7. **Automatic Detection**: context-gather auto-detects test session and gathers source session context
-8. **Parse --use-codex Flag**: Extract flag from arguments and pass to Phase 4 (test-task-generate)
+8. **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description, passed to Phase 4
+9. **Command Boundary**: This command ends at Phase 5 summary. Test execution is NOT part of this command.
+10. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+11. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
 ## 5-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Create Test Session
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]\"")`
 
-**Input**: `sourceSessionId` from user argument (e.g., `WFS-user-auth`)
+**Step 1.0: Load Source Session Intent** - Preserve user's original task description for semantic CLI selection
+
+```javascript
+// Read source session metadata to get original task description
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/workflow-session.json")
+// OR if context-package exists:
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/.process/context-package.json")
+
+// Extract: metadata.task_description or project/description field
+// This preserves user's CLI tool preferences (e.g., "use Codex for fixes")
+```
+
+**Step 1.1: Dispatch** - Create new test workflow session with preserved intent
+
+```javascript
+// Include original task description to enable semantic CLI selection
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]: [originalTaskDescription]\"")
+```
+
+**Input**:
+- `sourceSessionId` from user argument (e.g., `WFS-user-auth`)
+- `originalTaskDescription` from source session metadata (preserves CLI tool preferences)
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Creates new session with pattern `WFS-test-[source-slug]` (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
 - Writes metadata to `workflow-session.json`:
   - `workflow_type: "test_session"`
   - `source_session_id: "[sourceSessionId]"`
+  - Description includes original user intent for semantic CLI selection
 - Returns new session ID for subsequent phases
 
 **Parse Output**:
@@ -68,7 +103,12 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 ### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Step 2.1: Dispatch** - Gather test coverage context from source session
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")
+```
 
 **Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1 (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
 
@@ -90,12 +130,49 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - Test framework detected
 - Test conventions documented
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather dispatched, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Load source session summaries (test-context-gather)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading source session summaries"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Analyze test coverage with MCP tools (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test coverage"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2.3: Identify coverage gaps and framework (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.1-2.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 2 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 2.1-2.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 2 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
 ---
 
 ### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [testContextPath]")`
+
+**Step 3.1: Dispatch** - Analyze test requirements with Gemini
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [testContextPath]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
@@ -122,16 +199,54 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
   - Implementation Targets (test files to create)
   - Success Criteria
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed, phase 4 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-concept-enhanced dispatched, INSERT 3 concept-enhanced tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Analyze coverage gaps with Gemini (test-concept-enhanced)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Study existing test patterns (test-concept-enhanced)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Studying test patterns"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Generate test generation strategy (test-concept-enhanced)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test strategy"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-concept-enhanced's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 3 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Step 4.1: Dispatch** - Generate test task JSON files and planning documents
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session [testSessionId]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
-- `--use-codex` flag (if present in original command)
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage for fixes is determined semantically from user's task description (e.g., "use Codex for automated fixes").
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3
@@ -161,82 +276,172 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - Task ID: `IMPL-002`
 - `meta.type: "test-fix"`
 - `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
-- `meta.use_codex: true|false` (based on --use-codex flag)
 - `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
 - `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
 - `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
-  - **Cycle pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if --use-codex) → retest
-  - **Tools configuration**: Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template, manual or Codex for fixes
+  - **Cycle pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → fix (agent or CLI based on `command` field) → retest
+  - **Tools configuration**: Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template, agent or CLI for fixes
   - **Exit conditions**: Success (all pass) or failure (max iterations)
 - `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase execution flow
   - Phase 1: Initial test execution
-  - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes (based on flag)
+  - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + fixes (agent or CLI based on step's `command` field)
   - Phase 3: Final validation and certification
 
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 4 completed, phase 5 in_progress
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-task-generate dispatched, INSERT 3 test-task-generate tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand dispatched - tasks attached)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.1: Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (test-task-generate)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Parsing test analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.2: Generate IMPL-001.json and IMPL-002.json (test-task-generate)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating task JSONs"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.3: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md (test-task-generate)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating plan documents"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-task-generate's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+
+**Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 4.1-4.3** sequentially
+
+<!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 4 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 4.1-4.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
+  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
+  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
+]
+```
+
+**Note**: Phase 4 tasks completed and collapsed to summary.
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 5: Return Summary to User
+### Phase 5: Return Summary (Command Ends Here)
+
+**Important**: This is the final phase of `/workflow:test-gen`. The command completes and returns control to the user. No automatic execution occurs.
 
 **Return to User**:
 ```
-Independent test-fix workflow created successfully!
+Test workflow preparation complete!
 
 Source Session: [sourceSessionId]
 Test Session: [testSessionId]
 
-Tasks Created:
-- IMPL-001: Test Generation (@code-developer)
-- IMPL-002: Test Execution & Fix Cycle (@test-fix-agent)
+Artifacts Created:
+- Test context analysis
+- Test generation strategy
+- Task definitions (IMPL-001, IMPL-002)
+- Implementation plan
 
 Test Framework: [detected framework]
 Test Files to Generate: [count]
-Max Fix Iterations: 5
-Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated] (based on --use-codex flag)
+Fix Mode: [Agent|CLI] (based on `command` field in implementation_approach steps)
 
-Next Steps:
-1. Review test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
-2. Execute workflow: /workflow:execute
-3. Monitor progress: /workflow:status
+Review Generated Artifacts:
+- Test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
+- Task list: .workflow/[testSessionId]/TODO_LIST.md
+- Analysis: .workflow/[testSessionId]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Ready for execution. Use appropriate workflow commands to proceed.
 ```
 
 **TodoWrite**: Mark phase 5 completed
 
+**Command Boundary**: After this phase, the command terminates and returns to user prompt.
+
 ---
 
 ## TodoWrite Pattern
 
-Track progress through 5 phases:
+**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for test-gen workflow with cross-session context gathering and test generation strategy.
 
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
-  {"content": "Gather test coverage context", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test coverage context"},
-  {"content": "Analyze test requirements with Gemini", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Analyzing test requirements"},
-  {"content": "Generate test generation and execution tasks", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
-  {"content": "Return workflow summary", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "activeForm": "Returning workflow summary"}
-]})
-```
+### Key Principles
 
-Update status to `in_progress` when starting each phase, mark `completed` when done.
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand dispatched):
+   - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+   - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
+   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
+   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
 
-## Data Flow
+2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
+   - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
+   - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
+   - Example: Phase 2.1-2.3 collapse to "Gather test coverage context: completed"
+   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+
+3. **Continuous Execution**:
+   - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
+   - No user intervention required between phases
+   - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
+
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase dispatched (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+
+### Test-Gen Specific Features
+
+- **Phase 2**: Cross-session context gathering from source implementation session
+- **Phase 3**: Test requirements analysis with Gemini for generation strategy
+- **Phase 4**: Dual-task generation (IMPL-001 for test generation, IMPL-002 for test execution)
+- **Fix Mode Configuration**: CLI tool usage determined semantically from user's task description
+
+
+
+**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 2, 3, 4) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
+
+## Execution Flow Diagram
 
 ```
-/workflow:test-gen WFS-user-auth
-  ↓
-Phase 1: session-start → WFS-test-user-auth
-  ↓
-Phase 2: test-context-gather → test-context-package.json
-  ↓
-Phase 3: test-concept-enhanced → TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-  ↓
-Phase 4: test-task-generate → IMPL-001.json + IMPL-002.json
-  ↓
-Phase 5: Return summary
-  ↓
-/workflow:execute → IMPL-001 (@code-developer) → IMPL-002 (@test-fix-agent)
+Test-Gen Workflow Orchestrator
+│
+├─ Phase 1: Create Test Session
+│  └─ /workflow:session:start --new
+│     └─ Returns: testSessionId (WFS-test-[source])
+│
+├─ Phase 2: Gather Test Context                           ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-context-gather
+│     ├─ Phase 2.1: Load source session summaries
+│     ├─ Phase 2.2: Analyze test coverage with MCP tools
+│     └─ Phase 2.3: Identify coverage gaps and framework
+│     └─ Returns: test-context-package.json               ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis                      ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced
+│     ├─ Phase 3.1: Analyze coverage gaps with Gemini
+│     ├─ Phase 3.2: Study existing test patterns
+│     └─ Phase 3.3: Generate test generation strategy
+│     └─ Returns: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md                ← COLLAPSED
+│
+├─ Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks                           ← ATTACHED (3 tasks)
+│  └─ /workflow:tools:test-task-generate
+│     ├─ Phase 4.1: Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+│     ├─ Phase 4.2: Generate IMPL-001.json and IMPL-002.json
+│     └─ Phase 4.3: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
+│     └─ Returns: Task JSONs and plans                    ← COLLAPSED
+│
+└─ Phase 5: Return Summary
+   └─ Command ends, control returns to user
+
+Artifacts Created:
+├── .workflow/active/WFS-test-[session]/
+│   ├── workflow-session.json
+│   ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+│   ├── TODO_LIST.md
+│   ├── .task/
+│   │   ├── IMPL-001.json (test generation task)
+│   │   └── IMPL-002.json (test execution task)
+│   └── .process/
+│       ├── test-context-package.json
+│       └── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Key Points:
+• ← ATTACHED: SlashCommand attaches sub-tasks to orchestrator TodoWrite
+• ← COLLAPSED: Sub-tasks executed and collapsed to phase summary
 ```
 
 ## Session Metadata
@@ -245,9 +450,16 @@ Test session includes `workflow_type: "test_session"` and `source_session_id` fo
 
 ## Task Output
 
-Generates two tasks:
-- **IMPL-001** (@code-developer): Test generation from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- **IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent): Test execution with iterative fix cycle (max 5 iterations)
+Generates two task definition files:
+- **IMPL-001.json**: Test generation task specification
+  - Agent: @code-developer
+  - Input: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+  - Output: Test files based on analysis
+- **IMPL-002.json**: Test execution and fix cycle specification
+  - Agent: @test-fix-agent
+  - Dependency: IMPL-001 must complete first
+  - Max iterations: 5
+  - Fix mode: Agent or CLI (based on `command` field in implementation_approach)
 
 See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete task JSON schemas.
 
@@ -263,7 +475,7 @@ See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete task JSON schemas.
 
 ## Output Files
 
-Created in `.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/`:
+Created in `.workflow/active/WFS-test-[session]/`:
 - `workflow-session.json` - Session metadata
 - `.process/test-context-package.json` - Coverage analysis
 - `.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` - Test requirements
@@ -272,33 +484,46 @@ Created in `.workflow/WFS-test-[session]/`:
 - `IMPL_PLAN.md` - Test plan
 - `TODO_LIST.md` - Task checklist
 
-## Agent Execution
+## Task Specifications
 
-**IMPL-001** (@code-developer):
-- Generates test files based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- Follows existing test patterns and conventions
+**IMPL-001.json Structure**:
+- `meta.type: "test-gen"`
+- `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
+- `context.requirements`: Generate tests based on TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- `flow_control.target_files`: Test files to create
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach`: Test generation strategy
 
-**IMPL-002** (@test-fix-agent):
-1. Run test suite
-2. Iterative fix cycle (max 5):
-   - Gemini diagnosis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
-   - Manual fix application (default) OR Codex applies fixes if --use-codex flag (resume mechanism)
-   - Retest and check regressions
-3. Final validation and certification
+**IMPL-002.json Structure**:
+- `meta.type: "test-fix"`
+- `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
+- `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
+  - Gemini diagnosis template
+  - Fix application mode (agent or CLI based on `command` field)
+  - Max iterations: 5
+- `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase flow
 
-See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for detailed specifications.
+See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete JSON schemas.
 
 ## Best Practices
 
-1. Run after implementation complete (ensure source session has summaries)
-2. Commit implementation changes before test-gen
-3. Monitor execution with `/workflow:status`
-4. Review iteration logs in `.process/fix-iteration-*`
+1. **Prerequisites**: Ensure source session has completed IMPL tasks with summaries
+2. **Clean State**: Commit implementation changes before running test-gen
+3. **Review Artifacts**: Check generated IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md before proceeding
+4. **Understand Scope**: This command only prepares artifacts; it does not execute tests
 
 ## Related Commands
 
-- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (coverage analysis)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3 (Gemini test analysis)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4 (task generation)
-- `/workflow:execute` - Execute workflow
-- `/workflow:status` - Check progress
+**Prerequisite Commands**:
+- `/workflow:plan` or `/workflow:execute` - Complete implementation session that needs test validation
+
+**Dispatched by This Command** (4 phases):
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create independent test workflow session
+- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2: Analyze test coverage and gather source session context
+- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3: Generate test requirements and strategy using Gemini
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs (CLI tool usage determined semantically)
+
+**Follow-up Commands**:
+- `/workflow:status` - Review generated test tasks
+- `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` - Execute test generation and fix cycles
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute generated test tasks