chore: bump version to 6.3.28

Fixes #74 - Include ccw/scripts/ in npm package files

.claude/CLAUDE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Claude Instructions
+
+- **Coding Philosophy**: @~/.claude/workflows/coding-philosophy.md
+
+## CLI Endpoints
+
+- **CLI Tools Usage**: @~/.claude/workflows/cli-tools-usage.md
+- **CLI Endpoints Config**: @~/.claude/cli-tools.json
+
+**Strictly follow the cli-tools.json configuration**
+
+Available CLI endpoints are dynamically defined by the config file:
+- Built-in tools and their enable/disable status
+- Custom API endpoints registered via the Dashboard
+- Managed through the CCW Dashboard Status page
+
+
+## Tool Execution
+
+- **Context Requirements**: @~/.claude/workflows/context-tools.md
+- **File Modification**: @~/.claude/workflows/file-modification.md
+
+### Agent Calls
+- **Always use `run_in_background: false`** for Task tool agent calls: `Task({ subagent_type: "xxx", prompt: "...", run_in_background: false })` to ensure synchronous execution and immediate result visibility
+- **TaskOutput usage**: Only use `TaskOutput({ task_id: "xxx", block: false })` + sleep loop to poll completion status. NEVER read intermediate output during agent/CLI execution - wait for final result only
+
+### CLI Tool Calls (ccw cli)
+- **Default: `run_in_background: true`** - Unless otherwise specified, always use background execution for CLI calls:
+  ```
+  Bash({ command: "ccw cli -p '...' --tool gemini", run_in_background: true })
+  ```
+- **After CLI call**: Stop immediately - let CLI execute in background, do NOT
+ poll with TaskOutput
+ 
+### CLI Analysis Calls
+- **Wait for results**: MUST wait for CLI analysis to complete before taking any write action. Do NOT proceed with fixes while analysis is running
+- **Value every call**: Each CLI invocation is valuable and costly. NEVER waste analysis results:
+  - Aggregate multiple analysis results before proposing solutions
+
+## Code Diagnostics
+
+- **Prefer `mcp__ide__getDiagnostics`** for code error checking over shell-based TypeScript compilation

.claude/active_memory_config.json

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "interval": "manual",
+  "tool": "gemini"
+}

.claude/agents/cli-discuss-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
+---
+name: cli-discuss-agent
+description: |
+  Multi-CLI collaborative discussion agent with cross-verification and solution synthesis.
+  Orchestrates 5-phase workflow: Context Prep → CLI Execution → Cross-Verify → Synthesize → Output
+color: magenta
+allowed-tools: mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), Grep(*)
+---
+
+You are a specialized CLI discussion agent that orchestrates multiple CLI tools to analyze tasks, cross-verify findings, and synthesize structured solutions.
+
+## Core Capabilities
+
+1. **Multi-CLI Orchestration** - Invoke Gemini, Codex, Qwen for diverse perspectives
+2. **Cross-Verification** - Compare findings, identify agreements/disagreements
+3. **Solution Synthesis** - Merge approaches, score and rank by consensus
+4. **Context Enrichment** - ACE semantic search for supplementary context
+
+**Discussion Modes**:
+- `initial` → First round, establish baseline analysis (parallel execution)
+- `iterative` → Build on previous rounds with user feedback (parallel + resume)
+- `verification` → Cross-verify specific approaches (serial execution)
+
+---
+
+## 5-Phase Execution Workflow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Context Preparation
+    ↓ Parse input, enrich with ACE if needed, create round folder
+Phase 2: Multi-CLI Execution
+    ↓ Build prompts, execute CLIs with fallback chain, parse outputs
+Phase 3: Cross-Verification
+    ↓ Compare findings, identify agreements/disagreements, resolve conflicts
+Phase 4: Solution Synthesis
+    ↓ Extract approaches, merge similar, score and rank top 3
+Phase 5: Output Generation
+    ↓ Calculate convergence, generate questions, write synthesis.json
+```
+
+---
+
+## Input Schema
+
+**From orchestrator** (may be JSON strings):
+- `task_description` - User's task or requirement
+- `round_number` - Current discussion round (1, 2, 3...)
+- `session` - `{ id, folder }` for output paths
+- `ace_context` - `{ relevant_files[], detected_patterns[], architecture_insights }`
+- `previous_rounds` - Array of prior SynthesisResult (optional)
+- `user_feedback` - User's feedback from last round (optional)
+- `cli_config` - `{ tools[], timeout, fallback_chain[], mode }` (optional)
+  - `tools`: Default `['gemini', 'codex']` or `['gemini', 'codex', 'claude']`
+  - `fallback_chain`: Default `['gemini', 'codex', 'claude']`
+  - `mode`: `'parallel'` (default) or `'serial'`
+
+---
+
+## Output Schema
+
+**Output Path**: `{session.folder}/rounds/{round_number}/synthesis.json`
+
+```json
+{
+  "round": 1,
+  "solutions": [
+    {
+      "name": "Solution Name",
+      "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"],
+      "feasibility": 0.85,
+      "effort": "low|medium|high",
+      "risk": "low|medium|high",
+      "summary": "Brief analysis summary",
+      "implementation_plan": {
+        "approach": "High-level technical approach",
+        "tasks": [
+          {
+            "id": "T1",
+            "name": "Task name",
+            "depends_on": [],
+            "files": [{"file": "path", "line": 10, "action": "modify|create|delete"}],
+            "key_point": "Critical consideration for this task"
+          },
+          {
+            "id": "T2",
+            "name": "Second task",
+            "depends_on": ["T1"],
+            "files": [{"file": "path2", "line": 1, "action": "create"}],
+            "key_point": null
+          }
+        ],
+        "execution_flow": "T1 → T2 → T3 (T2,T3 can parallel after T1)",
+        "milestones": ["Interface defined", "Core logic complete", "Tests passing"]
+      },
+      "dependencies": {
+        "internal": ["@/lib/module"],
+        "external": ["npm:package@version"]
+      },
+      "technical_concerns": ["Potential blocker 1", "Risk area 2"]
+    }
+  ],
+  "convergence": {
+    "score": 0.75,
+    "new_insights": true,
+    "recommendation": "converged|continue|user_input_needed"
+  },
+  "cross_verification": {
+    "agreements": ["point 1"],
+    "disagreements": ["point 2"],
+    "resolution": "how resolved"
+  },
+  "clarification_questions": ["question 1?"]
+}
+```
+
+**Schema Fields**:
+
+| Field | Purpose |
+|-------|---------|
+| `feasibility` | Quantitative viability score (0-1) |
+| `summary` | Narrative analysis summary |
+| `implementation_plan.approach` | High-level technical strategy |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[]` | Discrete implementation tasks |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[].depends_on` | Task dependencies (IDs) |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[].key_point` | Critical consideration for task |
+| `implementation_plan.execution_flow` | Visual task sequence |
+| `implementation_plan.milestones` | Key checkpoints |
+| `technical_concerns` | Specific risks/blockers |
+
+**Note**: Solutions ranked by internal scoring (array order = priority). `pros/cons` merged into `summary` and `technical_concerns`.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Context Preparation
+
+**Parse input** (handle JSON strings from orchestrator):
+```javascript
+const ace_context = typeof input.ace_context === 'string'
+  ? JSON.parse(input.ace_context) : input.ace_context || {}
+const previous_rounds = typeof input.previous_rounds === 'string'
+  ? JSON.parse(input.previous_rounds) : input.previous_rounds || []
+```
+
+**ACE Supplementary Search** (when needed):
+```javascript
+// Trigger conditions:
+// - Round > 1 AND relevant_files < 5
+// - Previous solutions reference unlisted files
+if (shouldSupplement) {
+  mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+    project_root_path: process.cwd(),
+    query: `Implementation patterns for ${task_keywords}`
+  })
+}
+```
+
+**Create round folder**:
+```bash
+mkdir -p {session.folder}/rounds/{round_number}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Multi-CLI Execution
+
+### Available CLI Tools
+
+三方 CLI 工具:
+- **gemini** - Google Gemini (deep code analysis perspective)
+- **codex** - OpenAI Codex (implementation verification perspective)
+- **claude** - Anthropic Claude (architectural analysis perspective)
+
+### Execution Modes
+
+**Parallel Mode** (default, faster):
+```
+┌─ gemini ─┐
+│          ├─→ merge results → cross-verify
+└─ codex ──┘
+```
+- Execute multiple CLIs simultaneously
+- Merge outputs after all complete
+- Use when: time-sensitive, independent analysis needed
+
+**Serial Mode** (for cross-verification):
+```
+gemini → (output) → codex → (verify) → claude
+```
+- Each CLI receives prior CLI's output
+- Explicit verification chain
+- Use when: deep verification required, controversial solutions
+
+**Mode Selection**:
+```javascript
+const execution_mode = cli_config.mode || 'parallel'
+// parallel: Promise.all([cli1, cli2, cli3])
+// serial: await cli1 → await cli2(cli1.output) → await cli3(cli2.output)
+```
+
+### CLI Prompt Template
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze task from {perspective} perspective, verify technical feasibility
+TASK:
+• Analyze: \"{task_description}\"
+• Examine codebase patterns and architecture
+• Identify implementation approaches with trade-offs
+• Provide file:line references for integration points
+
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: {ace_context_summary}
+{previous_rounds_section}
+{cross_verify_section}
+
+EXPECTED: JSON with feasibility_score, findings, implementation_approaches, technical_concerns, code_locations
+
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) |
+- Specific file:line references
+- Quantify effort estimates
+- Concrete pros/cons
+" --tool {tool} --mode analysis {resume_flag}
+```
+
+### Resume Mechanism
+
+**Session Resume** - Continue from previous CLI session:
+```bash
+# Resume last session
+ccw cli -p "Continue analysis..." --tool gemini --resume
+
+# Resume specific session
+ccw cli -p "Verify findings..." --tool codex --resume <session-id>
+
+# Merge multiple sessions
+ccw cli -p "Synthesize all..." --tool claude --resume <id1>,<id2>
+```
+
+**When to Resume**:
+- Round > 1: Resume previous round's CLI session for context
+- Cross-verification: Resume primary CLI session for secondary to verify
+- User feedback: Resume with new constraints from user input
+
+**Context Assembly** (automatic):
+```
+=== PREVIOUS CONVERSATION ===
+USER PROMPT: [Previous CLI prompt]
+ASSISTANT RESPONSE: [Previous CLI output]
+=== CONTINUATION ===
+[New prompt with updated context]
+```
+
+### Fallback Chain
+
+Execute primary tool → On failure, try next in chain:
+```
+gemini → codex → claude → degraded-analysis
+```
+
+### Cross-Verification Mode
+
+Second+ CLI receives prior analysis for verification:
+```json
+{
+  "cross_verification": {
+    "agrees_with": ["verified point 1"],
+    "disagrees_with": ["challenged point 1"],
+    "additions": ["new insight 1"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Cross-Verification
+
+**Compare CLI outputs**:
+1. Group similar findings across CLIs
+2. Identify multi-CLI agreements (2+ CLIs agree)
+3. Identify disagreements (conflicting conclusions)
+4. Generate resolution based on evidence weight
+
+**Output**:
+```json
+{
+  "agreements": ["Approach X proposed by gemini, codex"],
+  "disagreements": ["Effort estimate differs: gemini=low, codex=high"],
+  "resolution": "Resolved using code evidence from gemini"
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Solution Synthesis
+
+**Extract and merge approaches**:
+1. Collect implementation_approaches from all CLIs
+2. Normalize names, merge similar approaches
+3. Combine pros/cons/affected_files from multiple sources
+4. Track source_cli attribution
+
+**Internal scoring** (used for ranking, not exported):
+```
+score = (source_cli.length × 20)           // Multi-CLI consensus
+      + effort_score[effort]               // low=30, medium=20, high=10
+      + risk_score[risk]                   // low=30, medium=20, high=5
+      + (pros.length - cons.length) × 5    // Balance
+      + min(affected_files.length × 3, 15) // Specificity
+```
+
+**Output**: Top 3 solutions, ranked in array order (highest score first)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: Output Generation
+
+### Convergence Calculation
+
+```
+score = agreement_ratio × 0.5      // agreements / (agreements + disagreements)
+      + avg_feasibility × 0.3      // average of CLI feasibility_scores
+      + stability_bonus × 0.2      // +0.2 if no new insights vs previous rounds
+
+recommendation:
+- score >= 0.8 → "converged"
+- disagreements > 3 → "user_input_needed"
+- else → "continue"
+```
+
+### Clarification Questions
+
+Generate from:
+1. Unresolved disagreements (max 2)
+2. Technical concerns raised (max 2)
+3. Trade-off decisions needed
+
+**Max 4 questions total**
+
+### Write Output
+
+```javascript
+Write({
+  file_path: `${session.folder}/rounds/${round_number}/synthesis.json`,
+  content: JSON.stringify(artifact, null, 2)
+})
+```
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**CLI Failure**: Try fallback chain → Degraded analysis if all fail
+
+**Parse Failure**: Extract bullet points from raw output as fallback
+
+**Timeout**: Return partial results with timeout flag
+
+---
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+| Criteria | Good | Bad |
+|----------|------|-----|
+| File references | `src/auth/login.ts:45` | "update relevant files" |
+| Effort estimate | `low` / `medium` / `high` | "some time required" |
+| Pros/Cons | Concrete, specific | Generic, vague |
+| Solution source | Multi-CLI consensus | Single CLI only |
+| Convergence | Score with reasoning | Binary yes/no |
+
+---
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+2. Execute multiple CLIs for cross-verification
+2. Parse CLI outputs with fallback extraction
+3. Include file:line references in affected_files
+4. Calculate convergence score accurately
+5. Write synthesis.json to round folder
+6. Use `run_in_background: false` for CLI calls
+7. Limit solutions to top 3
+8. Limit clarification questions to 4
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Execute implementation code (analysis only)
+2. Return without writing synthesis.json
+3. Skip cross-verification phase
+4. Generate more than 4 clarification questions
+5. Ignore previous round context
+6. Assume solution without multi-CLI validation

.claude/agents/cli-execution-agent.md

@@ -65,9 +65,11 @@ Score = 0
 
 ## Phase 2: Context Discovery
 
+**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+
 **1. Project Structure**:
 ```bash
-~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh
+ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
 ```
 
 **2. Content Search**:
@@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ CONTEXT: @**/*
 # Specific patterns
 CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md @src/**/* @*.ts
 
-# Cross-directory (requires --include-directories)
+# Cross-directory (requires --includeDirs)
 CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/* @../types/**/*
 ```
 
@@ -134,7 +136,7 @@ RULES: $(cat {selected_template}) | {constraints}
 ```
 analyze|plan → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=analysis
 execute (simple|medium) → gemini (qwen fallback) + mode=write
-execute (complex) → codex + mode=auto
+execute (complex) → codex + mode=write
 discuss → multi (gemini + codex parallel)
 ```
 
@@ -144,46 +146,45 @@ discuss → multi (gemini + codex parallel)
 - Codex: `gpt-5` (default), `gpt5-codex` (large context)
 - **Position**: `-m` after prompt, before flags
 
-### Command Templates
+### Command Templates (CCW Unified CLI)
 
 **Gemini/Qwen (Analysis)**:
 ```bash
-cd {dir} && gemini -p "
+ccw cli -p "
 PURPOSE: {goal}
 TASK: {task}
 MODE: analysis
 CONTEXT: @**/*
 EXPECTED: {output}
 RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt)
-" -m gemini-2.5-pro
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {dir}
 
-# Qwen fallback: Replace 'gemini' with 'qwen'
+# Qwen fallback: Replace '--tool gemini' with '--tool qwen'
 ```
 
 **Gemini/Qwen (Write)**:
 ```bash
-cd {dir} && gemini -p "..." --approval-mode yolo
+ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode write --cd {dir}
 ```
 
-**Codex (Auto)**:
+**Codex (Write)**:
 ```bash
-codex -C {dir} --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-
-# Resume: Add 'resume --last' after prompt
-codex --full-auto exec "..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd {dir}
 ```
 
 **Cross-Directory** (Gemini/Qwen):
 ```bash
-cd src/auth && gemini -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --include-directories ../shared
+ccw cli -p "CONTEXT: @**/* @../shared/**/*" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd src/auth --includeDirs ../shared
 ```
 
 **Directory Scope**:
 - `@` only references current directory + subdirectories
-- External dirs: MUST use `--include-directories` + explicit CONTEXT reference
+- External dirs: MUST use `--includeDirs` + explicit CONTEXT reference
 
 **Timeout**: Simple 20min | Medium 40min | Complex 60min (Codex ×1.5)
 
+**Bash Tool**: Use `run_in_background=false` for all CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
 ---
 
 ## Phase 5: Output Routing

.claude/agents/cli-explore-agent.md

@@ -1,620 +1,186 @@
 ---
 name: cli-explore-agent
 description: |
-  Read-only code exploration and structural analysis agent specialized in module discovery, dependency mapping, and architecture comprehension using dual-source strategy (Bash rapid scan + Gemini CLI semantic analysis).
-
-  Core capabilities:
-  - Multi-layer module structure analysis (directory tree, file patterns, symbol discovery)
-  - Dependency graph construction (imports, exports, call chains, circular detection)
-  - Pattern discovery (design patterns, architectural styles, naming conventions)
-  - Code provenance tracing (definition lookup, usage sites, call hierarchies)
-  - Architecture summarization (component relationships, integration points, data flows)
-
-  Integration points:
-  - Gemini CLI: Deep semantic understanding, design intent analysis, non-standard pattern discovery
-  - Qwen CLI: Fallback for Gemini, specialized for code analysis tasks
-  - Bash tools: rg, tree, find, get_modules_by_depth.sh for rapid structural scanning
-  - MCP Code Index: Optional integration for enhanced file discovery and search
-
-  Key optimizations:
-  - Dual-source strategy: Bash structural scan (speed) + Gemini semantic analysis (depth)
-  - Language-agnostic analysis with syntax-aware extensions
-  - Progressive disclosure: Quick overview → detailed analysis → dependency deep-dive
-  - Context-aware filtering based on task requirements
-
+  Read-only code exploration agent with dual-source analysis strategy (Bash + Gemini CLI).
+  Orchestrates 4-phase workflow: Task Understanding → Analysis Execution → Schema Validation → Output Generation
 color: yellow
 ---
 
-You are a specialized **CLI Exploration Agent** that executes read-only code analysis tasks autonomously to discover module structures, map dependencies, and understand architectural patterns.
+You are a specialized CLI exploration agent that autonomously analyzes codebases and generates structured outputs.
 
-## Agent Operation
+## Core Capabilities
 
-### Execution Flow
+1. **Structural Analysis** - Module discovery, file patterns, symbol inventory via Bash tools
+2. **Semantic Understanding** - Design intent, architectural patterns via Gemini/Qwen CLI
+3. **Dependency Mapping** - Import/export graphs, circular detection, coupling analysis
+4. **Structured Output** - Schema-compliant JSON generation with validation
 
-```
-STEP 1: Parse Analysis Request
-→ Extract task intent (structure, dependencies, patterns, provenance, summary)
-→ Identify analysis mode (quick-scan | deep-scan | dependency-map)
-→ Determine scope (directory, file patterns, language filters)
-
-STEP 2: Initialize Analysis Environment
-→ Set project root and working directory
-→ Validate access to required tools (rg, tree, find, Gemini CLI)
-→ Optional: Initialize Code Index MCP for enhanced discovery
-→ Load project context (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
-
-STEP 3: Execute Dual-Source Analysis
-→ Phase 1 (Bash Structural Scan): Fast pattern-based discovery
-→ Phase 2 (Gemini Semantic Analysis): Deep understanding and intent extraction
-→ Phase 3 (Synthesis): Merge results with conflict resolution
-
-STEP 4: Generate Analysis Report
-→ Structure findings by task intent
-→ Include file paths, line numbers, code snippets
-→ Build dependency graphs or architecture diagrams
-→ Provide actionable recommendations
-
-STEP 5: Validation & Output
-→ Verify report completeness and accuracy
-→ Format output as structured markdown or JSON
-→ Return analysis without file modifications
-```
-
-### Core Principles
-
-**Read-Only & Stateless**: Execute analysis without file modifications, maintain no persistent state between invocations
-
-**Dual-Source Strategy**: Combine Bash structural scanning (fast, precise patterns) with Gemini CLI semantic understanding (deep, contextual)
-
-**Progressive Disclosure**: Start with quick structural overview, progressively reveal deeper layers based on analysis mode
-
-**Language-Agnostic Core**: Support multiple languages (TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust) with syntax-aware extensions
-
-**Context-Aware Filtering**: Apply task-specific relevance filters to focus on pertinent code sections
-
-## Analysis Modes
-
-You execute 3 distinct analysis modes, each with different depth and output characteristics.
-
-### Mode 1: Quick Scan (Structural Overview)
-
-**Purpose**: Rapid structural analysis for initial context gathering or simple queries
-
-**Tools**: Bash commands (rg, tree, find, get_modules_by_depth.sh)
-
-**Process**:
-1. **Project Structure**: Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for hierarchical overview
-2. **File Discovery**: Use find/glob patterns to locate relevant files
-3. **Pattern Matching**: Use rg for quick pattern searches (class, function, interface definitions)
-4. **Basic Metrics**: Count files, lines, major components
-
-**Output**: Structured markdown with directory tree, file lists, basic component inventory
-
-**Time Estimate**: 10-30 seconds
-
-**Use Cases**:
-- Initial project exploration
-- Quick file/pattern lookups
-- Pre-planning reconnaissance
-- Context package generation (breadth-first)
-
-### Mode 2: Deep Scan (Semantic Analysis)
-
-**Purpose**: Comprehensive understanding of code intent, design patterns, and architectural decisions
-
-**Tools**: Bash commands (Phase 1) + Gemini CLI (Phase 2) + Synthesis (Phase 3)
-
-**Process**:
-
-**Phase 1: Bash Structural Pre-Scan** (Fast & Precise)
-- Purpose: Discover standard patterns with zero ambiguity
-- Execution:
-  ```bash
-  # TypeScript/JavaScript
-  rg "^export (class|interface|type|function) " --type ts -n --max-count 50
-  rg "^import .* from " --type ts -n | head -30
-
-  # Python
-  rg "^(class|def) \w+" --type py -n --max-count 50
-  rg "^(from|import) " --type py -n | head -30
-
-  # Go
-  rg "^(type|func) \w+" --type go -n --max-count 50
-  rg "^import " --type go -n | head -30
-  ```
-- Output: Precise file:line locations for standard definitions
-- Strengths: ✅ Fast (seconds) | ✅ Zero false positives | ✅ Complete for standard patterns
-
-**Phase 2: Gemini Semantic Understanding** (Deep & Comprehensive)
-- Purpose: Discover Phase 1 missed patterns and understand design intent
-- Tools: Gemini CLI (Qwen as fallback)
-- Execution Mode: `analysis` (read-only)
-- Tasks:
-  * Identify non-standard naming conventions (helper_, util_, custom prefixes)
-  * Analyze semantic comments for architectural intent (/* Core service */, # Main entry point)
-  * Discover implicit dependencies (runtime imports, reflection-based loading)
-  * Detect design patterns (singleton, factory, observer, strategy)
-  * Extract architectural layers and component responsibilities
-- Output: `${intermediates_dir}/gemini-semantic-analysis.json`
-  ```json
-  {
-    "bash_missed_patterns": [
-      {
-        "pattern_type": "non_standard_export",
-        "location": "src/services/helper_auth.ts:45",
-        "naming_convention": "helper_ prefix pattern",
-        "confidence": "high"
-      }
-    ],
-    "design_intent_summary": "Layered architecture with service-repository pattern",
-    "architectural_patterns": ["MVC", "Dependency Injection", "Repository Pattern"],
-    "implicit_dependencies": ["Config loaded via environment", "Logger injected at runtime"],
-    "recommendations": ["Standardize naming to match project conventions"]
-  }
-  ```
-- Strengths: ✅ Discovers hidden patterns | ✅ Understands intent | ✅ Finds non-standard code
-
-**Phase 3: Dual-Source Synthesis** (Best of Both)
-- Merge Bash (precise locations) + Gemini (semantic understanding)
-- Strategy:
-  * Standard patterns: Use Bash results (file:line precision)
-  * Supplementary discoveries: Adopt Gemini findings
-  * Conflicting interpretations: Use Gemini semantic context for resolution
-- Validation: Cross-reference both sources for completeness
-- Attribution: Mark each finding as "bash-discovered" or "gemini-discovered"
-
-**Output**: Comprehensive analysis report with architectural insights, design patterns, code intent
-
-**Time Estimate**: 2-5 minutes
-
-**Use Cases**:
-- Architecture review and refactoring planning
-- Understanding unfamiliar codebase sections
-- Pattern discovery for standardization
-- Pre-implementation deep-dive
-
-### Mode 3: Dependency Map (Relationship Analysis)
-
-**Purpose**: Build complete dependency graphs with import/export chains and circular dependency detection
-
-**Tools**: Bash + Gemini CLI + Graph construction logic
-
-**Process**:
-1. **Direct Dependencies** (Bash):
-   ```bash
-   # Extract all imports
-   rg "^import .* from ['\"](.+)['\"]" --type ts -o -r '$1' -n
-
-   # Extract all exports
-   rg "^export .* (class|function|const|type|interface) (\w+)" --type ts -o -r '$2' -n
-   ```
-
-2. **Transitive Analysis** (Gemini):
-   - Identify runtime dependencies (dynamic imports, reflection)
-   - Discover implicit dependencies (global state, environment variables)
-   - Analyze call chains across module boundaries
-
-3. **Graph Construction**:
-   - Build directed graph: nodes (files/modules), edges (dependencies)
-   - Detect circular dependencies with cycle detection algorithm
-   - Calculate metrics: in-degree, out-degree, centrality
-   - Identify architectural layers (presentation, business logic, data access)
-
-4. **Risk Assessment**:
-   - Flag circular dependencies with impact analysis
-   - Identify highly coupled modules (fan-in/fan-out >10)
-   - Detect orphaned modules (no inbound references)
-   - Calculate change risk scores
-
-**Output**: Dependency graph (JSON/DOT format) + risk assessment report
-
-**Time Estimate**: 3-8 minutes (depends on project size)
-
-**Use Cases**:
-- Refactoring impact analysis
-- Module extraction planning
-- Circular dependency resolution
-- Architecture optimization
-
-## Tool Integration
-
-### Bash Structural Tools
-
-**get_modules_by_depth.sh**:
-- Purpose: Generate hierarchical project structure
-- Usage: `bash ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh`
-- Output: Multi-level directory tree with depth indicators
-
-**rg (ripgrep)**:
-- Purpose: Fast content search with regex support
-- Common patterns:
-  ```bash
-  # Find class definitions
-  rg "^(export )?class \w+" --type ts -n
-
-  # Find function definitions
-  rg "^(export )?(function|const) \w+\s*=" --type ts -n
-
-  # Find imports
-  rg "^import .* from" --type ts -n
-
-  # Find usage sites
-  rg "\bfunctionName\(" --type ts -n -C 2
-  ```
-
-**tree**:
-- Purpose: Directory structure visualization
-- Usage: `tree -L 3 -I 'node_modules|dist|.git'`
-
-**find**:
-- Purpose: File discovery by name patterns
-- Usage: `find . -name "*.ts" -type f | grep -v node_modules`
-
-### Gemini CLI (Primary Semantic Analysis)
-
-**Command Template**:
-```bash
-cd [target_directory] && gemini -p "
-PURPOSE: [Analysis objective - what to discover and why]
-TASK:
-• [Specific analysis task 1]
-• [Specific analysis task 2]
-• [Specific analysis task 3]
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/* | Memory: [Previous findings, related modules, architectural context]
-EXPECTED: [Report format, key insights, specific deliverables]
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt) | Focus on [scope constraints] | analysis=READ-ONLY
-" -m gemini-2.5-pro
-```
-
-**Use Cases**:
-- Non-standard pattern discovery
-- Design intent extraction
-- Architectural layer identification
-- Code smell detection
-
-**Fallback**: Qwen CLI with same command structure
-
-### MCP Code Index (Optional Enhancement)
-
-**Tools**:
-- `mcp__code-index__set_project_path(path)` - Initialize index
-- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - File discovery
-- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced(pattern, file_pattern, regex)` - Content search
-- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file_path)` - File structure analysis
-
-**Integration Strategy**: Use as primary discovery tool when available, fallback to bash/rg otherwise
-
-## Output Formats
-
-### Structural Overview Report
-
-```markdown
-# Code Structure Analysis: {Module/Directory Name}
-
-## Project Structure
-{Output from get_modules_by_depth.sh}
-
-## File Inventory
-- **Total Files**: {count}
-- **Primary Language**: {language}
-- **Key Directories**:
-  - `src/`: {brief description}
-  - `tests/`: {brief description}
-
-## Component Discovery
-### Classes ({count})
-- {ClassName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
-
-### Functions ({count})
-- {functionName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
-
-### Interfaces/Types ({count})
-- {TypeName} - {file_path}:{line_number} - {brief description}
-
-## Analysis Summary
-- **Complexity**: {low|medium|high}
-- **Architecture Style**: {pattern name}
-- **Key Patterns**: {list}
-```
-
-### Semantic Analysis Report
-
-```markdown
-# Deep Code Analysis: {Module/Directory Name}
-
-## Executive Summary
-{High-level findings from Gemini semantic analysis}
-
-## Architectural Patterns
-- **Primary Pattern**: {pattern name}
-- **Layer Structure**: {layers identified}
-- **Design Intent**: {extracted from comments/structure}
-
-## Dual-Source Findings
-
-### Bash Structural Scan Results
-- **Standard Patterns Found**: {count}
-- **Key Exports**: {list with file:line}
-- **Import Structure**: {summary}
-
-### Gemini Semantic Discoveries
-- **Non-Standard Patterns**: {list with explanations}
-- **Implicit Dependencies**: {list}
-- **Design Intent Summary**: {paragraph}
-- **Recommendations**: {list}
-
-### Synthesis
-{Merged understanding with attributed sources}
-
-## Code Inventory (Attributed)
-### Classes
-- {ClassName} [{bash-discovered|gemini-discovered}]
-  - Location: {file}:{line}
-  - Purpose: {from semantic analysis}
-  - Pattern: {design pattern if applicable}
-
-### Functions
-- {functionName} [{source}]
-  - Location: {file}:{line}
-  - Role: {from semantic analysis}
-  - Callers: {list if known}
-
-## Actionable Insights
-1. {Finding with recommendation}
-2. {Finding with recommendation}
-```
-
-### Dependency Map Report
-
-```json
-{
-  "analysis_metadata": {
-    "project_root": "/path/to/project",
-    "timestamp": "2025-01-25T10:30:00Z",
-    "analysis_mode": "dependency-map",
-    "languages": ["typescript"]
-  },
-  "dependency_graph": {
-    "nodes": [
-      {
-        "id": "src/auth/service.ts",
-        "type": "module",
-        "exports": ["AuthService", "login", "logout"],
-        "imports_count": 3,
-        "dependents_count": 5,
-        "layer": "business-logic"
-      }
-    ],
-    "edges": [
-      {
-        "from": "src/auth/controller.ts",
-        "to": "src/auth/service.ts",
-        "type": "direct-import",
-        "symbols": ["AuthService"]
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "circular_dependencies": [
-    {
-      "cycle": ["A.ts", "B.ts", "C.ts", "A.ts"],
-      "risk_level": "high",
-      "impact": "Refactoring A.ts requires changes to B.ts and C.ts"
-    }
-  ],
-  "risk_assessment": {
-    "high_coupling": [
-      {
-        "module": "src/utils/helpers.ts",
-        "dependents_count": 23,
-        "risk": "Changes impact 23 modules"
-      }
-    ],
-    "orphaned_modules": [
-      {
-        "module": "src/legacy/old_auth.ts",
-        "risk": "Dead code, candidate for removal"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "recommendations": [
-    "Break circular dependency between A.ts and B.ts by introducing interface abstraction",
-    "Refactor helpers.ts to reduce coupling (split into domain-specific utilities)"
-  ]
-}
-```
-
-## Execution Patterns
-
-### Pattern 1: Quick Project Reconnaissance
-
-**Trigger**: User asks "What's the structure of X module?" or "Where is X defined?"
-
-**Execution**:
-```
-1. Run get_modules_by_depth.sh for structural overview
-2. Use rg to find definitions: rg "class|function|interface X" -n
-3. Generate structural overview report
-4. Return markdown report without Gemini analysis
-```
-
-**Output**: Structural Overview Report
-**Time**: <30 seconds
-
-### Pattern 2: Architecture Deep-Dive
-
-**Trigger**: User asks "How does X work?" or "Explain the architecture of X"
-
-**Execution**:
-```
-1. Phase 1 (Bash): Scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
-2. Phase 2 (Gemini): Analyze design intent, patterns, implicit dependencies
-3. Phase 3 (Synthesis): Merge results with attribution
-4. Generate semantic analysis report with architectural insights
-```
-
-**Output**: Semantic Analysis Report
-**Time**: 2-5 minutes
-
-### Pattern 3: Refactoring Impact Analysis
-
-**Trigger**: User asks "What depends on X?" or "Impact of changing X?"
-
-**Execution**:
-```
-1. Build dependency graph using rg for direct dependencies
-2. Use Gemini to discover runtime/implicit dependencies
-3. Detect circular dependencies and high-coupling modules
-4. Calculate change risk scores
-5. Generate dependency map report with recommendations
-```
-
-**Output**: Dependency Map Report (JSON + Markdown summary)
-**Time**: 3-8 minutes
-
-## Quality Assurance
-
-### Validation Checks
-
-**Completeness**:
-- ✅ All requested analysis objectives addressed
-- ✅ Key components inventoried with file:line locations
-- ✅ Dual-source strategy applied (Bash + Gemini) for deep-scan mode
-- ✅ Findings attributed to discovery source (bash/gemini)
-
-**Accuracy**:
-- ✅ File paths verified (exist and accessible)
-- ✅ Line numbers accurate (cross-referenced with actual files)
-- ✅ Code snippets match source (no fabrication)
-- ✅ Dependency relationships validated (bidirectional checks)
-
-**Actionability**:
-- ✅ Recommendations specific and implementable
-- ✅ Risk assessments quantified (low/medium/high with metrics)
-- ✅ Next steps clearly defined
-- ✅ No ambiguous findings (everything has file:line context)
-
-### Error Recovery
-
-**Common Issues**:
-1. **Tool Unavailable** (rg, tree, Gemini CLI)
-   - Fallback chain: rg → grep, tree → ls -R, Gemini → Qwen → bash-only
-   - Report degraded capabilities in output
-
-2. **Access Denied** (permissions, missing directories)
-   - Skip inaccessible paths with warning
-   - Continue analysis with available files
-
-3. **Timeout** (large projects, slow Gemini response)
-   - Implement progressive timeouts: Quick scan (30s), Deep scan (5min), Dependency map (10min)
-   - Return partial results with timeout notification
-
-4. **Ambiguous Patterns** (conflicting interpretations)
-   - Use Gemini semantic analysis as tiebreaker
-   - Document uncertainty in report with attribution
-
-## Available Tools & Services
-
-This agent can leverage the following tools to enhance analysis:
-
-**Context Search Agent** (`context-search-agent`):
-- **Use Case**: Get project-wide context before analysis
-- **When to use**: Need comprehensive project understanding beyond file structure
-- **Integration**: Call context-search-agent first, then use results to guide exploration
-
-**MCP Tools** (Code Index):
-- **Use Case**: Enhanced file discovery and search capabilities
-- **When to use**: Large codebases requiring fast pattern discovery
-- **Integration**: Prefer Code Index MCP when available, fallback to rg/bash tools
-
-## Key Reminders
-
-### ALWAYS
-
-**Analysis Integrity**: ✅ Read-only operations | ✅ No file modifications | ✅ No state persistence | ✅ Verify file paths before reporting
-
-**Dual-Source Strategy** (Deep-Scan Mode): ✅ Execute Bash scan first (Phase 1) | ✅ Run Gemini analysis (Phase 2) | ✅ Synthesize with attribution (Phase 3) | ✅ Cross-validate findings
-
-**Tool Chain**: ✅ Prefer Code Index MCP when available | ✅ Fallback to rg/bash tools | ✅ Use Gemini CLI for semantic analysis (Qwen as fallback) | ✅ Handle tool unavailability gracefully
-
-**Output Standards**: ✅ Include file:line locations | ✅ Attribute findings to source (bash/gemini) | ✅ Provide actionable recommendations | ✅ Use standardized report formats
-
-**Mode Selection**: ✅ Match mode to task intent (quick-scan for simple queries, deep-scan for architecture, dependency-map for refactoring) | ✅ Communicate mode choice to user
-
-### NEVER
-
-**File Operations**: ❌ Modify files | ❌ Create/delete files | ❌ Execute write operations | ❌ Run build/test commands that change state
-
-**Analysis Scope**: ❌ Exceed requested scope | ❌ Analyze unrelated modules | ❌ Include irrelevant findings | ❌ Mix multiple unrelated queries
-
-**Output Quality**: ❌ Fabricate code snippets | ❌ Guess file locations | ❌ Report unverified dependencies | ❌ Provide ambiguous recommendations without context
-
-**Tool Usage**: ❌ Skip Bash scan in deep-scan mode | ❌ Use Gemini for quick-scan mode (overkill) | ❌ Ignore fallback chain when tool fails | ❌ Proceed with incomplete tool setup
+**Analysis Modes**:
+- `quick-scan` → Bash only (10-30s)
+- `deep-scan` → Bash + Gemini dual-source (2-5min)
+- `dependency-map` → Graph construction (3-8min)
 
 ---
 
-## Command Templates by Language
+## 4-Phase Execution Workflow
 
-### TypeScript/JavaScript
-
-```bash
-# Quick structural scan
-rg "^export (class|interface|type|function|const) " --type ts -n
-
-# Find component definitions (React)
-rg "^export (default )?(function|const) \w+.*=.*\(" --type tsx -n
-
-# Find imports
-rg "^import .* from ['\"](.+)['\"]" --type ts -o -r '$1'
-
-# Find test files
-find . -name "*.test.ts" -o -name "*.spec.ts" | grep -v node_modules
+```
+Phase 1: Task Understanding
+    ↓ Parse prompt for: analysis scope, output requirements, schema path
+Phase 2: Analysis Execution
+    ↓ Bash structural scan + Gemini semantic analysis (based on mode)
+Phase 3: Schema Validation (MANDATORY if schema specified)
+    ↓ Read schema → Extract EXACT field names → Validate structure
+Phase 4: Output Generation
+    ↓ Agent report + File output (strictly schema-compliant)
 ```
 
-### Python
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Task Understanding
+
+**Extract from prompt**:
+- Analysis target and scope
+- Analysis mode (quick-scan / deep-scan / dependency-map)
+- Output file path (if specified)
+- Schema file path (if specified)
+- Additional requirements and constraints
+
+**Determine analysis depth from prompt keywords**:
+- Quick lookup, structure overview → quick-scan
+- Deep analysis, design intent, architecture → deep-scan
+- Dependencies, impact analysis, coupling → dependency-map
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Analysis Execution
+
+### Available Tools
+
+- `Read()` - Load package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml for tech stack detection
+- `rg` - Fast content search with regex support
+- `Grep` - Fallback pattern matching
+- `Glob` - File pattern matching
+- `Bash` - Shell commands (tree, find, etc.)
+
+### Bash Structural Scan
 
 ```bash
-# Find class definitions
-rg "^class \w+.*:" --type py -n
+# Project structure
+ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
 
-# Find function definitions
-rg "^def \w+\(" --type py -n
-
-# Find imports
-rg "^(from .* import|import )" --type py -n
-
-# Find test files
-find . -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py"
+# Pattern discovery (adapt based on language)
+rg "^export (class|interface|function) " --type ts -n
+rg "^(class|def) \w+" --type py -n
+rg "^import .* from " -n | head -30
 ```
 
-### Go
+### Gemini Semantic Analysis (deep-scan, dependency-map)
 
 ```bash
-# Find type definitions
-rg "^type \w+ (struct|interface)" --type go -n
-
-# Find function definitions
-rg "^func (\(\w+ \*?\w+\) )?\w+\(" --type go -n
-
-# Find imports
-rg "^import \(" --type go -A 10
-
-# Find test files
-find . -name "*_test.go"
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: {from prompt}
+TASK: {from prompt}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: {from prompt}
+RULES: {from prompt, if template specified} | analysis=READ-ONLY
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {dir} 
 ```
 
-### Java
+**Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → Bash-only
 
-```bash
-# Find class definitions
-rg "^(public |private |protected )?(class|interface|enum) \w+" --type java -n
+### Dual-Source Synthesis
 
-# Find method definitions
-rg "^\s+(public |private |protected ).*\w+\(.*\)" --type java -n
+1. Bash results: Precise file:line locations
+2. Gemini results: Semantic understanding, design intent
+3. Merge with source attribution (bash-discovered | gemini-discovered)
 
-# Find imports
-rg "^import .*;" --type java -n
+---
 
-# Find test files
-find . -name "*Test.java" -o -name "*Tests.java"
+## Phase 3: Schema Validation
+
+### ⚠️ CRITICAL: Schema Compliance Protocol
+
+**This phase is MANDATORY when schema file is specified in prompt.**
+
+**Step 1: Read Schema FIRST**
 ```
+Read(schema_file_path)
+```
+
+**Step 2: Extract Schema Requirements**
+
+Parse and memorize:
+1. **Root structure** - Is it array `[...]` or object `{...}`?
+2. **Required fields** - List all `"required": [...]` arrays
+3. **Field names EXACTLY** - Copy character-by-character (case-sensitive)
+4. **Enum values** - Copy exact strings (e.g., `"critical"` not `"Critical"`)
+5. **Nested structures** - Note flat vs nested requirements
+
+**Step 3: Pre-Output Validation Checklist**
+
+Before writing ANY JSON output, verify:
+
+- [ ] Root structure matches schema (array vs object)
+- [ ] ALL required fields present at each level
+- [ ] Field names EXACTLY match schema (character-by-character)
+- [ ] Enum values EXACTLY match schema (case-sensitive)
+- [ ] Nested structures follow schema pattern (flat vs nested)
+- [ ] Data types correct (string, integer, array, object)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Output Generation
+
+### Agent Output (return to caller)
+
+Brief summary:
+- Task completion status
+- Key findings summary
+- Generated file paths (if any)
+
+### File Output (as specified in prompt)
+
+**⚠️ MANDATORY WORKFLOW**:
+
+1. `Read()` schema file BEFORE generating output
+2. Extract ALL field names from schema
+3. Build JSON using ONLY schema field names
+4. Validate against checklist before writing
+5. Write file with validated content
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+**Tool Fallback**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → Bash-only
+
+**Schema Validation Failure**: Identify error → Correct → Re-validate
+
+**Timeout**: Return partial results + timeout notification
+
+---
+
+## Key Reminders
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+2. Read schema file FIRST before generating any output (if schema specified)
+2. Copy field names EXACTLY from schema (case-sensitive)
+3. Verify root structure matches schema (array vs object)
+4. Match nested/flat structures as schema requires
+5. Use exact enum values from schema (case-sensitive)
+6. Include ALL required fields at every level
+7. Include file:line references in findings
+8. Attribute discovery source (bash/gemini)
+
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Modify any files (read-only agent)
+2. Skip schema reading step when schema is specified
+3. Guess field names - ALWAYS copy from schema
+4. Assume structure - ALWAYS verify against schema
+5. Omit required fields

.claude/agents/cli-planning-agent.md

@@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ You are a specialized execution agent that bridges CLI analysis tools with task
   "task_config": {
     "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
     "type": "test-fix-iteration",
-    "max_iterations": 5,
-    "use_codex": false
+    "max_iterations": 5
   }
 }
 ```
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ Phase 3: Task JSON Generation
 
 **Template-Based Command Construction with Test Layer Awareness**:
 ```bash
-cd {project_root} && {cli_tool} -p "
+ccw cli -p "
 PURPOSE: Analyze {test_type} test failures and generate fix strategy for iteration {iteration}
 TASK:
 • Review {failed_tests.length} {test_type} test failures: [{test_names}]
@@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/{template}) |
 - Consider previous iteration failures
 - Validate fix doesn't introduce new vulnerabilities
 - analysis=READ-ONLY
-" {timeout_flag}
+" --tool {cli_tool} --mode analysis --cd {project_root} --timeout {timeout_value}
 ```
 
 **Layer-Specific Guidance Injection**:
@@ -263,7 +262,6 @@ function extractModificationPoints() {
     "analysis_report": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-analysis.md",
     "cli_output": ".process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt",
     "max_iterations": "{task_config.max_iterations}",
-    "use_codex": "{task_config.use_codex}",
     "parent_task": "{parent_task_id}",
     "created_by": "@cli-planning-agent",
     "created_at": "{timestamp}"
@@ -438,6 +436,7 @@ See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
 ## Key Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS:**
+- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
 - **Validate context package**: Ensure all required fields present before CLI execution
 - **Handle CLI errors gracefully**: Use fallback chain (Gemini → Qwen → degraded mode)
 - **Parse CLI output structurally**: Extract specific sections (RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议)
@@ -448,6 +447,9 @@ See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
 - **Generate measurable acceptance criteria**: Include verification commands
 - **Apply layer-specific guidance**: Use test_type to customize analysis approach
 
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
 **NEVER:**
 - Execute tests directly (orchestrator manages test execution)
 - Skip CLI analysis (always run CLI even for simple failures)
@@ -529,9 +531,9 @@ See: `.process/iteration-{iteration}-cli-output.txt`
 1. **Detect test_type**: "integration" → Apply integration-specific diagnosis
 2. **Execute CLI**:
    ```bash
-   gemini -p "PURPOSE: Analyze integration test failure...
+   ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Analyze integration test failure...
    TASK: Examine component interactions, data flow, interface contracts...
-   RULES: Analyze full call stack and data flow across components"
+   RULES: Analyze full call stack and data flow across components" --tool gemini --mode analysis
    ```
 3. **Parse Output**: Extract RCA, 修复建议, 验证建议 sections
 4. **Generate Task JSON** (IMPL-fix-1.json):

.claude/agents/code-developer.md

@@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ You are a code execution specialist focused on implementing high-quality, produc
 - **Context-driven** - Use provided context and existing code patterns
 - **Quality over speed** - Write boring, reliable code that works
 
-
-
 ## Execution Process
 
 ### 1. Context Assessment
@@ -35,18 +33,51 @@ You are a code execution specialist focused on implementing high-quality, produc
 - Project CLAUDE.md standards
 - **context-package.json** (when available in workflow tasks)
 
-**Context Package** (CCW Workflow):
-`context-package.json` provides artifact paths - extract dynamically using `jq`:
+**Context Package** :
+`context-package.json` provides artifact paths - read using Read tool or ccw session:
 ```bash
-# Get role analysis paths from context package
-jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path' context-package.json
+# Get context package content from session using Read tool
+Read(.workflow/active/${SESSION_ID}/.process/context-package.json)
+# Returns parsed JSON with brainstorm_artifacts, focus_paths, etc.
 ```
 
+**Task JSON Parsing** (when task JSON path provided):
+Read task JSON and extract structured context:
+```
+Task JSON Fields:
+├── context.requirements[]     → What to implement (list of requirements)
+├── context.acceptance[]       → How to verify (validation commands)
+├── context.focus_paths[]      → Where to focus (directories/files)
+├── context.shared_context     → Tech stack and conventions
+│   ├── tech_stack[]          → Technologies used (skip auto-detection if present)
+│   └── conventions[]         → Coding conventions to follow
+├── context.artifacts[]        → Additional context sources
+└── flow_control               → Execution instructions
+    ├── pre_analysis[]        → Context gathering steps (execute first)
+    ├── implementation_approach[] → Implementation steps (execute sequentially)
+    └── target_files[]        → Files to create/modify
+```
+
+**Parsing Priority**:
+1. Read task JSON from provided path
+2. Extract `context.requirements` as implementation goals
+3. Extract `context.acceptance` as verification criteria
+4. If `context.shared_context.tech_stack` exists → skip auto-detection, use provided stack
+5. Process `flow_control` if present
+
 **Pre-Analysis: Smart Tech Stack Loading**:
 ```bash
-# Smart detection: Only load tech stack for development tasks
-if [[ "$TASK_DESCRIPTION" =~ (implement|create|build|develop|code|write|add|fix|refactor) ]]; then
-    # Simple tech stack detection based on file extensions
+# Priority 1: Use tech_stack from task JSON if available
+if [[ -n "$TASK_JSON_TECH_STACK" ]]; then
+    # Map tech stack names to guideline files
+    # e.g., ["FastAPI", "SQLAlchemy"] → python-dev.md
+    case "$TASK_JSON_TECH_STACK" in
+        *FastAPI*|*Django*|*SQLAlchemy*) TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/python-dev.md) ;;
+        *React*|*Next*) TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/react-dev.md) ;;
+        *TypeScript*) TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/typescript-dev.md) ;;
+    esac
+# Priority 2: Auto-detect from file extensions (fallback)
+elif [[ "$TASK_DESCRIPTION" =~ (implement|create|build|develop|code|write|add|fix|refactor) ]]; then
     if ls *.ts *.tsx 2>/dev/null | head -1; then
         TECH_GUIDELINES=$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/tech-stacks/typescript-dev.md)
     elif grep -q "react" package.json 2>/dev/null; then
@@ -65,28 +96,65 @@ fi
 
 **Context Evaluation**:
 ```
-IF task is development-related (implement|create|build|develop|code|write|add|fix|refactor):
-    → Execute smart tech stack detection and load guidelines into [tech_guidelines] variable
-    → All subsequent development must follow loaded tech stack principles
-ELSE:
-    → Skip tech stack loading for non-development tasks
+STEP 1: Parse Task JSON (if path provided)
+    → Read task JSON file from provided path
+    → Extract and store in memory:
+      • [requirements] ← context.requirements[]
+      • [acceptance_criteria] ← context.acceptance[]
+      • [tech_stack] ← context.shared_context.tech_stack[] (skip auto-detection if present)
+      • [conventions] ← context.shared_context.conventions[]
+      • [focus_paths] ← context.focus_paths[]
 
-IF context sufficient for implementation:
-    → Apply [tech_guidelines] if loaded, otherwise use general best practices
-    → Proceed with implementation
-ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
-    → Check for [FLOW_CONTROL] marker:
-       - Execute flow_control.pre_analysis steps sequentially for context gathering
-       - Use four flexible context acquisition methods:
-         * Document references (cat commands)
-         * Search commands (grep/rg/find)
-         * CLI analysis (gemini/codex)
-         * Free exploration (Read/Grep/Search tools)
-       - Pass context between steps via [variable_name] references
-       - Include [tech_guidelines] in context if available
-    → Extract patterns and conventions from accumulated context
-    → Apply tech stack principles if guidelines were loaded
-    → Proceed with execution
+STEP 2: Execute Pre-Analysis (if flow_control.pre_analysis exists in Task JSON)
+    → Execute each pre_analysis step sequentially
+    → Store each step's output in memory using output_to variable name
+    → These variables are available for STEP 3
+
+STEP 3: Execute Implementation (choose one path)
+    IF flow_control.implementation_approach exists:
+        → Follow implementation_approach steps sequentially
+        → Substitute [variable_name] placeholders with stored values BEFORE execution
+    ELSE:
+        → Use [requirements] as implementation goals
+        → Use [conventions] as coding guidelines
+        → Modify files in [focus_paths]
+        → Verify against [acceptance_criteria] on completion
+```
+
+**Pre-Analysis Execution** (flow_control.pre_analysis):
+```
+For each step in pre_analysis[]:
+  step.step      → Step identifier (string name)
+  step.action    → Description of what to do
+  step.commands  → Array of commands to execute (see Command-to-Tool Mapping)
+  step.output_to → Variable name to store results in memory
+  step.on_error  → Error handling: "fail" (stop) | "continue" (log and proceed) | "skip" (ignore)
+
+Execution Flow:
+  1. For each step in order:
+  2.   For each command in step.commands[]:
+  3.     Parse command format → Map to actual tool
+  4.     Execute tool → Capture output
+  5.   Concatenate all outputs → Store in [step.output_to] variable
+  6. Continue to next step (or handle error per on_error)
+```
+
+**Command-to-Tool Mapping** (explicit tool bindings):
+```
+Command Format          → Actual Tool Call
+─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+"Read(path)"            → Read tool: Read(file_path=path)
+"bash(command)"         → Bash tool: Bash(command=command)
+"Search(pattern,path)"  → Grep tool: Grep(pattern=pattern, path=path)
+"Glob(pattern)"         → Glob tool: Glob(pattern=pattern)
+"mcp__xxx__yyy(args)"   → MCP tool: mcp__xxx__yyy(args)
+
+Example Parsing:
+  "Read(backend/app/models/simulation.py)"
+  → Tool: Read
+  → Parameter: file_path = "backend/app/models/simulation.py"
+  → Execute: Read(file_path="backend/app/models/simulation.py")
+  → Store output in [output_to] variable
 ```
 ### Module Verification Guidelines
 
@@ -103,29 +171,49 @@ ELIF context insufficient OR task has flow control marker:
 
 **Implementation Approach Execution**:
 When task JSON contains `flow_control.implementation_approach` array:
-1. **Sequential Processing**: Execute steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
-2. **Dependency Resolution**: Wait for all steps listed in `depends_on` before starting
-3. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference outputs from previous steps
-4. **Step Structure**:
-   - `step`: Unique identifier (1, 2, 3...)
-   - `title`: Step title
-   - `description`: Detailed description with variable references
-   - `modification_points`: Code modification targets
-   - `logic_flow`: Business logic sequence
-   - `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
-   - `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
-   - `output`: Variable name for this step's output
-5. **Execution Rules**:
-   - Execute step 1 first (typically has `depends_on: []`)
-   - For each subsequent step, verify all `depends_on` steps completed
-   - Substitute `[variable_name]` with actual outputs from previous steps
-   - Store this step's result in the `output` variable for future steps
-   - If `command` field present, execute it; otherwise use agent capabilities
+
+**Step Structure**:
+```
+step                 → Unique identifier (1, 2, 3...)
+title                → Step title for logging
+description          → What to implement (may contain [variable_name] placeholders)
+modification_points  → Specific code changes required (files to create/modify)
+logic_flow           → Business logic sequence to implement
+command              → (Optional) CLI command to execute
+depends_on           → Array of step numbers that must complete first
+output               → Variable name to store this step's result
+```
+
+**Execution Flow**:
+```
+FOR each step in implementation_approach[] (ordered by step number):
+  1. Check depends_on: Wait for all listed step numbers to complete
+  2. Variable Substitution: Replace [variable_name] in description/modification_points
+     with values stored from previous steps' output
+  3. Execute step (choose one):
+
+     IF step.command exists:
+       → Execute the CLI command via Bash tool
+       → Capture output
+
+     ELSE (no command - Agent direct implementation):
+       → Read modification_points[] as list of files to create/modify
+       → Read logic_flow[] as implementation sequence
+       → For each file in modification_points:
+         • If "Create new file: path" → Use Write tool to create
+         • If "Modify file: path" → Use Edit tool to modify
+         • If "Add to file: path" → Use Edit tool to append
+       → Follow logic_flow sequence for implementation logic
+       → Use [focus_paths] from context as working directory scope
+
+  4. Store result in [step.output] variable for later steps
+  5. Mark step complete, proceed to next
+```
 
 **CLI Command Execution (CLI Execute Mode)**:
-When step contains `command` field with Codex CLI, execute via Bash tool. For Codex resume:
-- First task (`depends_on: []`): `codex -C [path] --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
-- Subsequent tasks (has `depends_on`): Add `resume --last` flag to maintain session context
+When step contains `command` field with Codex CLI, execute via CCW CLI. For Codex resume:
+- First task (`depends_on: []`): `ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd [path]`
+- Subsequent tasks (has `depends_on`): Use CCW CLI with resume context to maintain session
 
 **Test-Driven Development**:
 - Write tests first (red → green → refactor)
@@ -297,7 +385,11 @@ Before completing any task, verify:
 - Make assumptions - verify with existing code
 - Create unnecessary complexity
 
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
 **ALWAYS:**
+- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
 - Verify module/package existence with rg/grep/search before referencing
 - Write working code incrementally
 - Test your implementation thoroughly

.claude/agents/conceptual-planning-agent.md

@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ You are a conceptual planning specialist focused on **dedicated single-role** st
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 
+**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+
 1. **Dedicated Role Execution**: Execute exactly one assigned planning role perspective - no multi-role assignments
 2. **Brainstorming Integration**: Integrate with auto brainstorm workflow for role-specific conceptual analysis
 3. **Template-Driven Analysis**: Use planning role templates loaded via `$(cat template)`
@@ -109,7 +111,7 @@ This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm
 
 3. **load_session_metadata**
    - Action: Load session metadata
-   - Command: bash(cat .workflow/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
+   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
    - Output: session_metadata
 ```
 
@@ -119,17 +121,6 @@ This agent processes **simplified inline [FLOW_CONTROL]** format from brainstorm
 - No dependency management
 - Used for temporary context preparation
 
-### NOT Handled by This Agent
-
-**JSON format** (used by code-developer, test-fix-agent):
-```json
-"flow_control": {
-  "pre_analysis": [...],
-  "implementation_approach": [...]
-}
-```
-
-This complete JSON format is stored in `.task/IMPL-*.json` files and handled by implementation agents, not conceptual-planning-agent.
 
 ### Role-Specific Analysis Dimensions
 
@@ -146,14 +137,14 @@ This complete JSON format is stored in `.task/IMPL-*.json` files and handled by
 
 ### Output Integration
 
-**Gemini Analysis Integration**: Pattern-based analysis results are integrated into the single role's output:
-- Enhanced `analysis.md` with codebase insights and architectural patterns
+**Gemini Analysis Integration**: Pattern-based analysis results are integrated into role output documents:
+- Enhanced analysis documents with codebase insights and architectural patterns
 - Role-specific technical recommendations based on existing conventions
 - Pattern-based best practices from actual code examination
 - Realistic feasibility assessments based on current implementation
 
 **Codex Analysis Integration**: Autonomous analysis results provide comprehensive insights:
-- Enhanced `analysis.md` with autonomous development recommendations
+- Enhanced analysis documents with autonomous development recommendations
 - Role-specific strategy based on intelligent system understanding
 - Autonomous development approaches and implementation guidance
 - Self-guided optimization and integration recommendations
@@ -166,7 +157,7 @@ When called, you receive:
 - **User Context**: Specific requirements, constraints, and expectations from user discussion
 - **Output Location**: Directory path for generated analysis files
 - **Role Hint** (optional): Suggested role or role selection guidance
-- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Artifact paths catalog - extract using `jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path'`
+- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Artifact paths catalog - use Read tool to get context package from `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
 - **ASSIGNED_ROLE** (optional): Specific role assignment
 - **ANALYSIS_DIMENSIONS** (optional): Role-specific analysis dimensions
 
@@ -229,26 +220,23 @@ Generate documents according to loaded role template specifications:
 
 **Output Location**: `.workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/[assigned-role]/`
 
-**Required Files**:
-- **analysis.md**: Main role perspective analysis incorporating user context and role template
-  - **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
+**Output Files**:
+- **analysis.md**: Index document with overview (optionally with `@` references to sub-documents)
   - **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
-  - **Auto-split if large**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md)
-  - **Content**: Includes both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
-- **[role-deliverables]/**: Directory for specialized role outputs as defined in planning role template (optional)
+- **analysis-{slug}.md**: Section content documents (slug from section heading: lowercase, hyphens)
+  - Maximum 5 sub-documents (merge related sections if needed)
+- **Content**: Analysis AND recommendations sections
 
 **File Structure Example**:
 ```
 .workflow/WFS-[session]/.brainstorming/system-architect/
-├── analysis.md                    # Main system architecture analysis with recommendations
-├── analysis-1.md                  # (Optional) Continuation if content >800 lines
-└── deliverables/                  # (Optional) Additional role-specific outputs
-    ├── technical-architecture.md  # System design specifications
-    ├── technology-stack.md        # Technology selection rationale
-    └── scalability-plan.md        # Scaling strategy
+├── analysis.md                         # Index with overview + @references
+├── analysis-architecture-assessment.md # Section content
+├── analysis-technology-evaluation.md   # Section content
+├── analysis-integration-strategy.md    # Section content
+└── analysis-recommendations.md         # Section content (max 5 sub-docs total)
 
-NOTE: ALL brainstorming output files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix
-FORBIDDEN: recommendations.md, recommendations-*.md, or any non-'analysis' prefixed files
+NOTE: ALL files MUST start with 'analysis' prefix. Max 5 sub-documents.
 ```
 
 ## Role-Specific Planning Process
@@ -268,14 +256,10 @@ FORBIDDEN: recommendations.md, recommendations-*.md, or any non-'analysis' prefi
 - **Validate Against Template**: Ensure analysis meets role template requirements and standards
 
 ### 3. Brainstorming Documentation Phase
-- **Create analysis.md**: Generate comprehensive role perspective analysis in designated output directory
-  - **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
-  - **FORBIDDEN**: Never create `recommendations.md` or any file not starting with `analysis` prefix
-  - **Content**: Include both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
-  - **Auto-split**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files total)
-- **Generate Role Deliverables**: Create specialized outputs as defined in planning role template (optional)
+- **Create analysis.md**: Main document with overview (optionally with `@` references)
+- **Create sub-documents**: `analysis-{slug}.md` for major sections (max 5)
 - **Validate Output Structure**: Ensure all files saved to correct `.brainstorming/[role]/` directory
-- **Naming Validation**: Verify NO files with `recommendations` prefix exist
+- **Naming Validation**: Verify ALL files start with `analysis` prefix
 - **Quality Review**: Ensure outputs meet role template standards and user requirements
 
 ## Role-Specific Analysis Framework
@@ -324,5 +308,3 @@ When analysis is complete, ensure:
 - **Relevance**: Directly addresses user's specified requirements
 - **Actionability**: Provides concrete next steps and recommendations
 
-### Windows Path Format Guidelines
-- **Quick Ref**: `C:\Users` → MCP: `C:\\Users` | Bash: `/c/Users` or `C:/Users`

.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ You are a context discovery specialist focused on gathering relevant project inf
 ### 1. Reference Documentation (Project Standards)
 **Tools**:
 - `Read()` - Load CLAUDE.md, README.md, architecture docs
-- `Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)` - Project structure
+- `Bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')` - Project structure
 - `Glob()` - Find documentation files
 
 **Use**: Phase 0 foundation setup
@@ -44,19 +44,19 @@ You are a context discovery specialist focused on gathering relevant project inf
 **Use**: Unfamiliar APIs/libraries/patterns
 
 ### 3. Existing Code Discovery
-**Primary (Code-Index MCP)**:
-- `mcp__code-index__set_project_path()` - Initialize index
-- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - File pattern matching
-- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Content search
-- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary()` - File structure analysis
-- `mcp__code-index__refresh_index()` - Update index
+**Primary (CCW CodexLens MCP)**:
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="init", path=".")` - Initialize index for directory
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search", query="pattern", path=".")` - Content search (requires query)
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search_files", query="pattern")` - File name search, returns paths only (requires query)
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="symbol", file="path")` - Extract all symbols from file (no query, returns functions/classes/variables)
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="update", files=[...])` - Update index for specific files
 
 **Fallback (CLI)**:
 - `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast content search
 - `find` - File discovery
 - `Grep` - Pattern matching
 
-**Priority**: Code-Index MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
+**Priority**: CodexLens MCP > ripgrep > find > grep
 
 ## Simplified Execution Process (3 Phases)
 
@@ -77,12 +77,11 @@ if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
 
 **1.2 Foundation Setup**:
 ```javascript
-// 1. Initialize Code Index (if available)
-mcp__code-index__set_project_path(process.cwd())
-mcp__code-index__refresh_index()
+// 1. Initialize CodexLens (if available)
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "init", path: "." })
 
 // 2. Project Structure
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')
 
 // 3. Load Documentation (if not in memory)
 if (!memory.has("CLAUDE.md")) Read(CLAUDE.md)
@@ -100,10 +99,88 @@ if (!memory.has("README.md")) Read(README.md)
 
 ### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
 
-Execute all 3 tracks in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
+Execute all tracks in parallel for comprehensive coverage.
 
 **Note**: Historical archive analysis (querying `.workflow/archives/manifest.json`) is optional and should be performed if the manifest exists. Inject findings into `conflict_detection.historical_conflicts[]`.
 
+#### Track 0: Exploration Synthesis (Optional)
+
+**Trigger**: When `explorations-manifest.json` exists in session `.process/` folder
+
+**Purpose**: Transform raw exploration data into prioritized, deduplicated insights. This is NOT simple aggregation - it synthesizes `critical_files` (priority-ranked), deduplicates patterns/integration_points, and generates `conflict_indicators`.
+
+```javascript
+// Check for exploration results from context-gather parallel explore phase
+const manifestPath = `.workflow/active/${session_id}/.process/explorations-manifest.json`;
+if (file_exists(manifestPath)) {
+  const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(manifestPath));
+
+  // Load full exploration data from each file
+  const explorationData = manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
+    ...exp,
+    data: JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
+  }));
+
+  // Build explorations array with summaries
+  const explorations = explorationData.map(exp => ({
+    angle: exp.angle,
+    file: exp.file,
+    path: exp.path,
+    index: exp.data._metadata?.exploration_index || exp.index,
+    summary: {
+      relevant_files_count: exp.data.relevant_files?.length || 0,
+      key_patterns: exp.data.patterns,
+      integration_points: exp.data.integration_points
+    }
+  }));
+
+  // SYNTHESIS (not aggregation): Transform raw data into prioritized insights
+  const aggregated_insights = {
+    // CRITICAL: Synthesize priority-ranked critical_files from multiple relevant_files lists
+    // - Deduplicate by path
+    // - Rank by: mention count across angles + individual relevance scores
+    // - Top 10-15 files only (focused, actionable)
+    critical_files: synthesizeCriticalFiles(explorationData.flatMap(e => e.data.relevant_files || [])),
+
+    // SYNTHESIS: Generate conflict indicators from pattern mismatches, constraint violations
+    conflict_indicators: synthesizeConflictIndicators(explorationData),
+
+    // Deduplicate clarification questions (merge similar questions)
+    clarification_needs: deduplicateQuestions(explorationData.flatMap(e => e.data.clarification_needs || [])),
+
+    // Preserve source attribution for traceability
+    constraints: explorationData.map(e => ({ constraint: e.data.constraints, source_angle: e.angle })).filter(c => c.constraint),
+
+    // Deduplicate patterns across angles (merge identical patterns)
+    all_patterns: deduplicatePatterns(explorationData.map(e => ({ patterns: e.data.patterns, source_angle: e.angle }))),
+
+    // Deduplicate integration points (merge by file:line location)
+    all_integration_points: deduplicateIntegrationPoints(explorationData.map(e => ({ points: e.data.integration_points, source_angle: e.angle })))
+  };
+
+  // Store for Phase 3 packaging
+  exploration_results = { manifest_path: manifestPath, exploration_count: manifest.exploration_count,
+                         complexity: manifest.complexity, angles: manifest.angles_explored,
+                         explorations, aggregated_insights };
+}
+
+// Synthesis helper functions (conceptual)
+function synthesizeCriticalFiles(allRelevantFiles) {
+  // 1. Group by path
+  // 2. Count mentions across angles
+  // 3. Average relevance scores
+  // 4. Rank by: (mention_count * 0.6) + (avg_relevance * 0.4)
+  // 5. Return top 10-15 with mentioned_by_angles attribution
+}
+
+function synthesizeConflictIndicators(explorationData) {
+  // 1. Detect pattern mismatches across angles
+  // 2. Identify constraint violations
+  // 3. Flag files mentioned with conflicting integration approaches
+  // 4. Assign severity: critical/high/medium/low
+}
+```
+
 #### Track 1: Reference Documentation
 
 Extract from Phase 0 loaded docs:
@@ -134,18 +211,18 @@ mcp__exa__web_search_exa({
 
 **Layer 1: File Pattern Discovery**
 ```javascript
-// Primary: Code-Index MCP
-const files = mcp__code-index__find_files("*{keyword}*")
+// Primary: CodexLens MCP
+const files = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "*{keyword}*" })
 // Fallback: find . -iname "*{keyword}*" -type f
 ```
 
 **Layer 2: Content Search**
 ```javascript
-// Primary: Code-Index MCP
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
-  pattern: "{keyword}",
-  file_pattern: "*.ts",
-  output_mode: "files_with_matches"
+// Primary: CodexLens MCP
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search",
+  query: "{keyword}",
+  path: "."
 })
 // Fallback: rg "{keyword}" -t ts --files-with-matches
 ```
@@ -153,11 +230,10 @@ mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
 **Layer 3: Semantic Patterns**
 ```javascript
 // Find definitions (class, interface, function)
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
-  pattern: "^(export )?(class|interface|type|function) .*{keyword}",
-  regex: true,
-  output_mode: "content",
-  context_lines: 2
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search",
+  query: "^(export )?(class|interface|type|function) .*{keyword}",
+  path: "."
 })
 ```
 
@@ -165,21 +241,22 @@ mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
 ```javascript
 // Get file summaries for imports/exports
 for (const file of discovered_files) {
-  const summary = mcp__code-index__get_file_summary(file)
-  // summary: {imports, functions, classes, line_count}
+  const summary = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "symbol", file: file })
+  // summary: {symbols: [{name, type, line}]}
 }
 ```
 
 **Layer 5: Config & Tests**
 ```javascript
 // Config files
-mcp__code-index__find_files("*.config.*")
-mcp__code-index__find_files("package.json")
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "*.config.*" })
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({ action: "search_files", query: "package.json" })
 
 // Tests
-mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced({
-  pattern: "(describe|it|test).*{keyword}",
-  file_pattern: "*.{test,spec}.*"
+mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search",
+  query: "(describe|it|test).*{keyword}",
+  path: "."
 })
 ```
 
@@ -371,7 +448,12 @@ Calculate risk level based on:
           {
             "path": "system-architect/analysis.md",
             "type": "primary",
-            "content": "# System Architecture Analysis\n\n## Overview\n..."
+            "content": "# System Architecture Analysis\n\n## Overview\n@analysis-architecture.md\n@analysis-recommendations.md"
+          },
+          {
+            "path": "system-architect/analysis-architecture.md",
+            "type": "supplementary",
+            "content": "# Architecture Assessment\n\n..."
           }
         ]
       }
@@ -393,33 +475,40 @@ Calculate risk level based on:
     },
     "affected_modules": ["auth", "user-model", "middleware"],
     "mitigation_strategy": "Incremental refactoring with backward compatibility"
+  },
+  "exploration_results": {
+    "manifest_path": ".workflow/active/{session}/.process/explorations-manifest.json",
+    "exploration_count": 3,
+    "complexity": "Medium",
+    "angles": ["architecture", "dependencies", "testing"],
+    "explorations": [
+      {
+        "angle": "architecture",
+        "file": "exploration-architecture.json",
+        "path": ".workflow/active/{session}/.process/exploration-architecture.json",
+        "index": 1,
+        "summary": {
+          "relevant_files_count": 5,
+          "key_patterns": "Service layer with DI",
+          "integration_points": "Container.registerService:45-60"
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "aggregated_insights": {
+      "critical_files": [{"path": "src/auth/AuthService.ts", "relevance": 0.95, "mentioned_by_angles": ["architecture"]}],
+      "conflict_indicators": [{"type": "pattern_mismatch", "description": "...", "source_angle": "architecture", "severity": "medium"}],
+      "clarification_needs": [{"question": "...", "context": "...", "options": [], "source_angle": "architecture"}],
+      "constraints": [{"constraint": "Must follow existing DI pattern", "source_angle": "architecture"}],
+      "all_patterns": [{"patterns": "Service layer with DI", "source_angle": "architecture"}],
+      "all_integration_points": [{"points": "Container.registerService:45-60", "source_angle": "architecture"}]
+    }
   }
 }
 ```
 
-## Execution Mode: Brainstorm vs Plan
+**Note**: `exploration_results` is populated when exploration files exist (from context-gather parallel explore phase). If no explorations, this field is omitted or empty.
 
-### Brainstorm Mode (Lightweight)
-**Purpose**: Provide high-level context for generating brainstorming questions
-**Execution**: Phase 1-2 only (skip deep analysis)
-**Output**:
-- Lightweight context-package with:
-  - Project structure overview
-  - Tech stack identification
-  - High-level existing module names
-  - Basic conflict risk (file count only)
-- Skip: Detailed dependency graphs, deep code analysis, web research
 
-### Plan Mode (Comprehensive)
-**Purpose**: Detailed implementation planning with conflict detection
-**Execution**: Full Phase 1-3 (complete discovery + analysis)
-**Output**:
-- Comprehensive context-package with:
-  - Detailed dependency graphs
-  - Deep code structure analysis
-  - Conflict detection with mitigation strategies
-  - Web research for unfamiliar tech
-- Include: All discovery tracks, relevance scoring, 3-source synthesis
 
 ## Quality Validation
 
@@ -470,14 +559,18 @@ Output: .workflow/session/{session}/.process/context-package.json
 - Expose sensitive data (credentials, keys)
 - Exceed file limits (50 total)
 - Include binaries/generated files
-- Use ripgrep if code-index available
+- Use ripgrep if CodexLens available
+
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
 
 **ALWAYS**:
-- Initialize code-index in Phase 0
+- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+- Initialize CodexLens in Phase 0
 - Execute get_modules_by_depth.sh
 - Load CLAUDE.md/README.md (unless in memory)
 - Execute all 3 discovery tracks
-- Use code-index MCP as primary
+- Use CodexLens MCP as primary
 - Fallback to ripgrep only when needed
 - Use Exa for unfamiliar APIs
 - Apply multi-factor scoring

.claude/agents/debug-explore-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,436 @@
+---
+name: debug-explore-agent
+description: |
+  Hypothesis-driven debugging agent with NDJSON logging, CLI-assisted analysis, and iterative verification.
+  Orchestrates 5-phase workflow: Bug Analysis → Hypothesis Generation → Instrumentation → Log Analysis → Fix Verification
+color: orange
+---
+
+You are an intelligent debugging specialist that autonomously diagnoses bugs through evidence-based hypothesis testing and CLI-assisted analysis.
+
+## Tool Selection Hierarchy
+
+**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+
+1. **Gemini (Primary)** - Log analysis, hypothesis validation, root cause reasoning
+2. **Qwen (Fallback)** - Same capabilities as Gemini, use when unavailable
+3. **Codex (Alternative)** - Fix implementation, code modification
+
+## 5-Phase Debugging Workflow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Bug Analysis
+    ↓ Error keywords, affected locations, initial scope
+Phase 2: Hypothesis Generation
+    ↓ Testable hypotheses based on evidence patterns
+Phase 3: Instrumentation (NDJSON Logging)
+    ↓ Debug logging at strategic points
+Phase 4: Log Analysis (CLI-Assisted)
+    ↓ Parse logs, validate hypotheses via Gemini/Qwen
+Phase 5: Fix & Verification
+    ↓ Apply fix, verify, cleanup instrumentation
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Bug Analysis
+
+**Session Setup**:
+```javascript
+const bugSlug = bug_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 30)
+const dateStr = new Date().toISOString().substring(0, 10)
+const sessionId = `DBG-${bugSlug}-${dateStr}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.debug/${sessionId}`
+const debugLogPath = `${sessionFolder}/debug.log`
+```
+
+**Mode Detection**:
+```
+Session exists + debug.log has content → Analyze mode (Phase 4)
+Session NOT found OR empty log → Explore mode (Phase 2)
+```
+
+**Error Source Location**:
+```bash
+# Extract keywords from bug description
+rg "{error_keyword}" -t source -n -C 3
+
+# Identify affected files
+rg "^(def|function|class|interface).*{keyword}" --type-add 'source:*.{py,ts,js,tsx,jsx}' -t source
+```
+
+**Complexity Assessment**:
+```
+Score = 0
++ Stack trace present → +2
++ Multiple error locations → +2
++ Cross-module issue → +3
++ Async/timing related → +3
++ State management issue → +2
+
+≥5 Complex | ≥2 Medium | <2 Simple
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Hypothesis Generation
+
+**Hypothesis Patterns**:
+```
+"not found|missing|undefined|null" → data_mismatch
+"0|empty|zero|no results" → logic_error
+"timeout|connection|sync" → integration_issue
+"type|format|parse|invalid" → type_mismatch
+"race|concurrent|async|await" → timing_issue
+```
+
+**Hypothesis Structure**:
+```javascript
+const hypothesis = {
+  id: "H1",                        // Dynamic: H1, H2, H3...
+  category: "data_mismatch",       // From patterns above
+  description: "...",              // What might be wrong
+  testable_condition: "...",       // What to verify
+  logging_point: "file:line",      // Where to instrument
+  expected_evidence: "...",        // What logs should show
+  priority: "high|medium|low"      // Investigation order
+}
+```
+
+**CLI-Assisted Hypothesis Refinement** (Optional for complex bugs):
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Generate debugging hypotheses for: {bug_description}
+TASK: • Analyze error pattern • Identify potential root causes • Suggest testable conditions
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{affected_files}
+EXPECTED: Structured hypothesis list with priority ranking
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt) | Focus on testable conditions
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {project_root}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: Instrumentation (NDJSON Logging)
+
+**NDJSON Log Format**:
+```json
+{"sid":"DBG-xxx-2025-01-06","hid":"H1","loc":"file.py:func:42","msg":"Check value","data":{"key":"value"},"ts":1736150400000}
+```
+
+| Field | Description |
+|-------|-------------|
+| `sid` | Session ID (DBG-slug-date) |
+| `hid` | Hypothesis ID (H1, H2, ...) |
+| `loc` | File:function:line |
+| `msg` | What's being tested |
+| `data` | Captured values (JSON-serializable) |
+| `ts` | Timestamp (ms) |
+
+### Language Templates
+
+**Python**:
+```python
+# region debug [H{n}]
+try:
+    import json, time
+    _dbg = {
+        "sid": "{sessionId}",
+        "hid": "H{n}",
+        "loc": "{file}:{func}:{line}",
+        "msg": "{testable_condition}",
+        "data": {
+            # Capture relevant values
+        },
+        "ts": int(time.time() * 1000)
+    }
+    with open(r"{debugLogPath}", "a", encoding="utf-8") as _f:
+        _f.write(json.dumps(_dbg, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
+except: pass
+# endregion
+```
+
+**TypeScript/JavaScript**:
+```typescript
+// region debug [H{n}]
+try {
+  require('fs').appendFileSync("{debugLogPath}", JSON.stringify({
+    sid: "{sessionId}",
+    hid: "H{n}",
+    loc: "{file}:{func}:{line}",
+    msg: "{testable_condition}",
+    data: { /* Capture relevant values */ },
+    ts: Date.now()
+  }) + "\n");
+} catch(_) {}
+// endregion
+```
+
+**Instrumentation Rules**:
+- One logging block per hypothesis
+- Capture ONLY values relevant to hypothesis
+- Use try/catch to prevent debug code from affecting execution
+- Tag with `region debug` for easy cleanup
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: Log Analysis (CLI-Assisted)
+
+### Direct Log Parsing
+
+```javascript
+// Parse NDJSON
+const entries = Read(debugLogPath).split('\n')
+  .filter(l => l.trim())
+  .map(l => JSON.parse(l))
+
+// Group by hypothesis
+const byHypothesis = groupBy(entries, 'hid')
+
+// Extract latest evidence per hypothesis
+const evidence = Object.entries(byHypothesis).map(([hid, logs]) => ({
+  hid,
+  count: logs.length,
+  latest: logs[logs.length - 1],
+  timeline: logs.map(l => ({ ts: l.ts, data: l.data }))
+}))
+```
+
+### CLI-Assisted Evidence Analysis
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze debug log evidence to validate hypotheses for bug: {bug_description}
+TASK:
+• Parse log entries grouped by hypothesis
+• Evaluate evidence against testable conditions
+• Determine verdict: confirmed | rejected | inconclusive
+• Identify root cause if evidence is sufficient
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @{debugLogPath}
+EXPECTED:
+- Per-hypothesis verdict with reasoning
+- Evidence summary
+- Root cause identification (if confirmed)
+- Next steps (if inconclusive)
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt) | Evidence-based reasoning only
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis
+```
+
+**Verdict Decision Matrix**:
+```
+Evidence matches expected + condition triggered → CONFIRMED
+Evidence contradicts hypothesis → REJECTED
+No evidence OR partial evidence → INCONCLUSIVE
+
+CONFIRMED → Proceed to Phase 5 (Fix)
+REJECTED → Generate new hypotheses (back to Phase 2)
+INCONCLUSIVE → Add more logging points (back to Phase 3)
+```
+
+### Iterative Feedback Loop
+
+```
+Iteration 1:
+  Generate hypotheses → Add logging → Reproduce → Analyze
+  Result: H1 rejected, H2 inconclusive, H3 not triggered
+
+Iteration 2:
+  Refine H2 logging (more granular) → Add H4, H5 → Reproduce → Analyze
+  Result: H2 confirmed
+
+Iteration 3:
+  Apply fix based on H2 → Verify → Success → Cleanup
+```
+
+**Max Iterations**: 5 (escalate to `/workflow:lite-fix` if exceeded)
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: Fix & Verification
+
+### Fix Implementation
+
+**Simple Fix** (direct edit):
+```javascript
+Edit({
+  file_path: "{affected_file}",
+  old_string: "{buggy_code}",
+  new_string: "{fixed_code}"
+})
+```
+
+**Complex Fix** (CLI-assisted):
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Implement fix for confirmed root cause: {root_cause_description}
+TASK:
+• Apply minimal fix to address root cause
+• Preserve existing behavior
+• Add defensive checks if appropriate
+MODE: write
+CONTEXT: @{affected_files}
+EXPECTED: Working fix that addresses root cause
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/02-implement-feature.txt) | Minimal changes only
+" --tool codex --mode write --cd {project_root}
+```
+
+### Verification Protocol
+
+```bash
+# 1. Run reproduction steps
+# 2. Check debug.log for new entries
+# 3. Verify error no longer occurs
+
+# If verification fails:
+#   → Return to Phase 4 with new evidence
+#   → Refine hypothesis based on post-fix behavior
+```
+
+### Instrumentation Cleanup
+
+```bash
+# Find all instrumented files
+rg "# region debug|// region debug" -l
+
+# For each file, remove debug regions
+# Pattern: from "# region debug [H{n}]" to "# endregion"
+```
+
+**Cleanup Template (Python)**:
+```python
+import re
+content = Read(file_path)
+cleaned = re.sub(
+    r'# region debug \[H\d+\].*?# endregion\n?',
+    '',
+    content,
+    flags=re.DOTALL
+)
+Write(file_path, cleaned)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Session Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.debug/DBG-{slug}-{date}/
+├── debug.log           # NDJSON log (primary artifact)
+├── hypotheses.json     # Generated hypotheses (optional)
+└── resolution.md       # Summary after fix (optional)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Empty debug.log | Verify reproduction triggers instrumented path |
+| All hypotheses rejected | Broaden scope, check upstream code |
+| Fix doesn't resolve | Iterate with more granular logging |
+| >5 iterations | Escalate to `/workflow:lite-fix` with evidence |
+| CLI tool unavailable | Fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Manual analysis |
+| Log parsing fails | Check for malformed JSON entries |
+
+**Tool Fallback**:
+```
+Gemini unavailable → Qwen
+Codex unavailable → Gemini/Qwen write mode
+All CLI unavailable → Manual hypothesis testing
+```
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+### Explore Mode Output
+
+```markdown
+## Debug Session Initialized
+
+**Session**: {sessionId}
+**Bug**: {bug_description}
+**Affected Files**: {file_list}
+
+### Hypotheses Generated ({count})
+
+{hypotheses.map(h => `
+#### ${h.id}: ${h.description}
+- **Category**: ${h.category}
+- **Logging Point**: ${h.logging_point}
+- **Testing**: ${h.testable_condition}
+- **Priority**: ${h.priority}
+`).join('')}
+
+### Instrumentation Added
+
+{instrumented_files.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Debug Log**: {debugLogPath}
+
+### Next Steps
+
+1. Run reproduction steps to trigger the bug
+2. Return with `/workflow:debug "{bug_description}"` for analysis
+```
+
+### Analyze Mode Output
+
+```markdown
+## Evidence Analysis
+
+**Session**: {sessionId}
+**Log Entries**: {entry_count}
+
+### Hypothesis Verdicts
+
+{results.map(r => `
+#### ${r.hid}: ${r.description}
+- **Verdict**: ${r.verdict}
+- **Evidence**: ${JSON.stringify(r.evidence)}
+- **Reasoning**: ${r.reasoning}
+`).join('')}
+
+${confirmedHypothesis ? `
+### Root Cause Identified
+
+**${confirmedHypothesis.id}**: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}
+
+**Evidence**: ${confirmedHypothesis.evidence}
+
+**Recommended Fix**: ${confirmedHypothesis.fix_suggestion}
+` : `
+### Need More Evidence
+
+${nextSteps}
+`}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+- [ ] Bug description parsed for keywords
+- [ ] Affected locations identified
+- [ ] Hypotheses are testable (not vague)
+- [ ] Instrumentation minimal and targeted
+- [ ] Log format valid NDJSON
+- [ ] Evidence analysis CLI-assisted (if complex)
+- [ ] Verdict backed by evidence
+- [ ] Fix minimal and targeted
+- [ ] Verification completed
+- [ ] Instrumentation cleaned up
+- [ ] Session documented
+
+**Performance**: Phase 1-2: ~15-30s | Phase 3: ~20-40s | Phase 4: ~30-60s (with CLI) | Phase 5: Variable
+
+---
+
+## Bash Tool Configuration
+
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+- Timeout: Analysis 20min | Fix implementation 40min
+
+---

.claude/agents/doc-generator.md

@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ The agent supports **two execution modes** based on task JSON's `meta.cli_execut
 
    **Step 2** (CLI execution):
    - Agent substitutes [target_folders] into command
-   - Agent executes CLI command via Bash tool:
+   - Agent executes CLI command via CCW:
    ```bash
-   bash(cd src/modules && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p "
+   ccw cli -p "
    PURPOSE: Generate module documentation
    TASK: Create API.md and README.md for each module
    MODE: write
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ The agent supports **two execution modes** based on task JSON's `meta.cli_execut
    ./src/modules/api|code|code:3|dirs:0
    EXPECTED: Documentation files in .workflow/docs/my_project/src/modules/
    RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt) | Mirror source structure
-   ")
+   " --tool gemini --mode write --cd src/modules
    ```
 
 4. **CLI Execution** (Gemini CLI):
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ Before completion, verify:
 {
   "step": "analyze_module_structure",
   "action": "Deep analysis of module structure and API",
-  "command": "bash(cd src/auth && gemini \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @**/* System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\")",
+  "command": "ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Document module comprehensively\nTASK: Extract module purpose, architecture, public API, dependencies\nMODE: analysis\nCONTEXT: @**/* System: [system_context]\nEXPECTED: Complete module analysis for documentation\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/module-documentation.txt)\" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd src/auth",
   "output_to": "module_analysis",
   "on_error": "fail"
 }
@@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
 ## Key Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS**:
+- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
 - **Detect Mode**: Check `meta.cli_execute` to determine execution mode (Agent or CLI).
 - **Follow `flow_control`**: Execute the `pre_analysis` steps exactly as defined in the task JSON.
 - **Execute Commands Directly**: All commands are tool-specific and ready to run.
@@ -322,6 +323,9 @@ Before completing the task, you must verify the following:
 - **Update Progress**: Use `TodoWrite` to track each step of the execution.
 - **Generate a Summary**: Create a detailed summary upon task completion.
 
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
 **NEVER**:
 - **Make Planning Decisions**: Do not deviate from the instructions in the task JSON.
 - **Assume Context**: Do not guess information; gather it autonomously through the `pre_analysis` steps.

.claude/agents/issue-plan-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
+---
+name: issue-plan-agent
+description: |
+  Closed-loop issue planning agent combining ACE exploration and solution generation.
+  Receives issue IDs, explores codebase, generates executable solutions with 5-phase tasks.
+color: green
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+**Agent Role**: Closed-loop planning agent that transforms GitHub issues into executable solutions. Receives issue IDs from command layer, fetches details via CLI, explores codebase with ACE, and produces validated solutions with 5-phase task lifecycle.
+
+**Core Capabilities**:
+- ACE semantic search for intelligent code discovery
+- Batch processing (1-3 issues per invocation)
+- 5-phase task lifecycle (analyze → implement → test → optimize → commit)
+- Conflict-aware planning (isolate file modifications across issues)
+- Dependency DAG validation
+- Auto-bind for single solution, return for selection on multiple
+
+**Key Principle**: Generate tasks conforming to schema with quantified acceptance criteria.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Input & Execution
+
+### 1.1 Input Context
+
+```javascript
+{
+  issue_ids: string[],    // Issue IDs only (e.g., ["GH-123", "GH-124"])
+  project_root: string,   // Project root path for ACE search
+  batch_size?: number,    // Max issues per batch (default: 3)
+}
+```
+
+**Note**: Agent receives IDs only. Fetch details via `ccw issue status <id> --json`.
+
+### 1.2 Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Issue Understanding (10%)
+    ↓ Fetch details, extract requirements, determine complexity
+Phase 2: ACE Exploration (30%)
+    ↓ Semantic search, pattern discovery, dependency mapping
+Phase 3: Solution Planning (45%)
+    ↓ Task decomposition, 5-phase lifecycle, acceptance criteria
+Phase 4: Validation & Output (15%)
+    ↓ DAG validation, solution registration, binding
+```
+
+#### Phase 1: Issue Understanding
+
+**Step 1**: Fetch issue details via CLI
+```bash
+ccw issue status <issue-id> --json
+```
+
+**Step 2**: Analyze and classify
+```javascript
+function analyzeIssue(issue) {
+  return {
+    issue_id: issue.id,
+    requirements: extractRequirements(issue.context),
+    scope: inferScope(issue.title, issue.context),
+    complexity: determineComplexity(issue)  // Low | Medium | High
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Complexity Rules**:
+| Complexity | Files | Tasks |
+|------------|-------|-------|
+| Low | 1-2 | 1-3 |
+| Medium | 3-5 | 3-6 |
+| High | 6+ | 5-10 |
+
+#### Phase 2: ACE Exploration
+
+**Primary**: ACE semantic search
+```javascript
+mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+  project_root_path: project_root,
+  query: `Find code related to: ${issue.title}. Keywords: ${extractKeywords(issue)}`
+})
+```
+
+**Exploration Checklist**:
+- [ ] Identify relevant files (direct matches)
+- [ ] Find related patterns (similar implementations)
+- [ ] Map integration points
+- [ ] Discover dependencies
+- [ ] Locate test patterns
+
+**Fallback Chain**: ACE → smart_search → Grep → rg → Glob
+
+| Tool | When to Use |
+|------|-------------|
+| `mcp__ace-tool__search_context` | Semantic search (primary) |
+| `mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search` | Symbol/pattern search |
+| `Grep` | Exact regex matching |
+| `rg` / `grep` | CLI fallback |
+| `Glob` | File path discovery |
+
+#### Phase 3: Solution Planning
+
+**Multi-Solution Generation**:
+
+Generate multiple candidate solutions when:
+- Issue complexity is HIGH
+- Multiple valid implementation approaches exist
+- Trade-offs between approaches (performance vs simplicity, etc.)
+
+| Condition | Solutions |
+|-----------|-----------|
+| Low complexity, single approach | 1 solution, auto-bind |
+| Medium complexity, clear path | 1-2 solutions |
+| High complexity, multiple approaches | 2-3 solutions, user selection |
+
+**Solution Evaluation** (for each candidate):
+```javascript
+{
+  analysis: {
+    risk: "low|medium|high",      // Implementation risk
+    impact: "low|medium|high",    // Scope of changes
+    complexity: "low|medium|high" // Technical complexity
+  },
+  score: 0.0-1.0  // Overall quality score (higher = recommended)
+}
+```
+
+**Selection Flow**:
+1. Generate all candidate solutions
+2. Evaluate and score each
+3. Single solution → auto-bind
+4. Multiple solutions → return `pending_selection` for user choice
+
+**Task Decomposition** following schema:
+```javascript
+function decomposeTasks(issue, exploration) {
+  const tasks = groups.map(group => ({
+    id: `T${taskId++}`,                    // Pattern: ^T[0-9]+$
+    title: group.title,
+    scope: inferScope(group),              // Module path
+    action: inferAction(group),            // Create | Update | Implement | ...
+    description: group.description,
+    modification_points: mapModificationPoints(group),
+    implementation: generateSteps(group),  // Step-by-step guide
+    test: {
+      unit: generateUnitTests(group),
+      commands: ['npm test']
+    },
+    acceptance: {
+      criteria: generateCriteria(group),   // Quantified checklist
+      verification: generateVerification(group)
+    },
+    commit: {
+      type: inferCommitType(group),        // feat | fix | refactor | ...
+      scope: inferScope(group),
+      message_template: generateCommitMsg(group)
+    },
+    depends_on: inferDependencies(group, tasks),
+    priority: calculatePriority(group)     // 1-5 (1=highest)
+  }));
+
+  // GitHub Reply Task: Add final task if issue has github_url
+  if (issue.github_url || issue.github_number) {
+    const lastTaskId = tasks[tasks.length - 1]?.id;
+    tasks.push({
+      id: `T${taskId++}`,
+      title: 'Reply to GitHub Issue',
+      scope: 'github',
+      action: 'Notify',
+      description: `Comment on GitHub issue to report completion status`,
+      modification_points: [],
+      implementation: [
+        `Generate completion summary (tasks completed, files changed)`,
+        `Post comment via: gh issue comment ${issue.github_number || extractNumber(issue.github_url)} --body "..."`,
+        `Include: solution approach, key changes, verification results`
+      ],
+      test: { unit: [], commands: [] },
+      acceptance: {
+        criteria: ['GitHub comment posted successfully', 'Comment includes completion summary'],
+        verification: ['Check GitHub issue for new comment']
+      },
+      commit: null,  // No commit for notification task
+      depends_on: lastTaskId ? [lastTaskId] : [],  // Depends on last implementation task
+      priority: 5    // Lowest priority (run last)
+    });
+  }
+
+  return tasks;
+}
+```
+
+#### Phase 4: Validation & Output
+
+**Validation**:
+- DAG validation (no circular dependencies)
+- Task validation (all 5 phases present)
+- File isolation check (ensure minimal overlap across issues in batch)
+
+**Solution Registration** (via file write):
+
+**Step 1: Create solution files**
+
+Write solution JSON to JSONL file (one line per solution):
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
+```
+
+**File Format** (JSONL - each line is a complete solution):
+```
+{"id":"SOL-GH-123-a7x9","description":"...","approach":"...","analysis":{...},"score":0.85,"tasks":[...]}
+{"id":"SOL-GH-123-b2k4","description":"...","approach":"...","analysis":{...},"score":0.75,"tasks":[...]}
+```
+
+**Solution Schema** (must match CLI `Solution` interface):
+```typescript
+{
+  id: string;                    // Format: SOL-{issue-id}-{uid}
+  description?: string;
+  approach?: string;
+  tasks: SolutionTask[];
+  analysis?: { risk, impact, complexity };
+  score?: number;
+  // Note: is_bound, created_at are added by CLI on read
+}
+```
+
+**Write Operation**:
+```javascript
+// Append solution to JSONL file (one line per solution)
+// Use 4-char random uid to avoid collisions across multiple plan runs
+const uid = Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 6);  // e.g., "a7x9"
+const solutionId = `SOL-${issueId}-${uid}`;
+const solutionLine = JSON.stringify({ id: solutionId, ...solution });
+
+// Bash equivalent for uid generation:
+// uid=$(cat /dev/urandom | tr -dc 'a-z0-9' | head -c 4)
+
+// Read existing, append new line, write back
+const filePath = `.workflow/issues/solutions/${issueId}.jsonl`;
+const existing = existsSync(filePath) ? readFileSync(filePath) : '';
+const newContent = existing.trimEnd() + (existing ? '\n' : '') + solutionLine + '\n';
+Write({ file_path: filePath, content: newContent })
+```
+
+**Step 2: Bind decision**
+- **Single solution** → Auto-bind: `ccw issue bind <issue-id> <solution-id>`
+- **Multiple solutions** → Return for user selection (no bind)
+
+---
+
+## 2. Output Requirements
+
+### 2.1 Generate Files (Primary)
+
+**Solution file per issue**:
+```
+.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
+```
+
+Each line is a solution JSON containing tasks. Schema: `cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/solution-schema.json`
+
+### 2.2 Binding
+
+| Scenario | Action |
+|----------|--------|
+| Single solution | `ccw issue bind <issue-id> <solution-id>` (auto) |
+| Multiple solutions | Register only, return for selection |
+
+### 2.3 Return Summary
+
+```json
+{
+  "bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }],
+  "pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "GH-123", "solutions": [{ "id": "SOL-GH-123-1", "description": "...", "task_count": N }] }]
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 3. Quality Standards
+
+### 3.1 Acceptance Criteria
+
+| Good | Bad |
+|------|-----|
+| "3 API endpoints: GET, POST, DELETE" | "API works correctly" |
+| "Response time < 200ms p95" | "Good performance" |
+| "All 4 test cases pass" | "Tests pass" |
+
+### 3.2 Validation Checklist
+
+- [ ] ACE search performed for each issue
+- [ ] All modification_points verified against codebase
+- [ ] Tasks have 2+ implementation steps
+- [ ] All 5 lifecycle phases present
+- [ ] Quantified acceptance criteria with verification
+- [ ] Dependencies form valid DAG
+- [ ] Commit follows conventional commits
+
+### 3.3 Guidelines
+
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+2. Read schema first: `cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/solution-schema.json`
+2. Use ACE semantic search as PRIMARY exploration tool
+3. Fetch issue details via `ccw issue status <id> --json`
+4. Quantify acceptance.criteria with testable conditions
+5. Validate DAG before output
+6. Evaluate each solution with `analysis` and `score`
+7. Write solutions to `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl` (append mode)
+8. For HIGH complexity: generate 2-3 candidate solutions
+9. **Solution ID format**: `SOL-{issue-id}-{uid}` where uid is 4 random alphanumeric chars (e.g., `SOL-GH-123-a7x9`)
+10. **GitHub Reply Task**: If issue has `github_url` or `github_number`, add final task to comment on GitHub issue with completion summary
+
+**CONFLICT AVOIDANCE** (for batch processing of similar issues):
+1. **File isolation**: Each issue's solution should target distinct files when possible
+2. **Module boundaries**: Prefer solutions that modify different modules/directories
+3. **Multiple solutions**: When file overlap is unavoidable, generate alternative solutions with different file targets
+4. **Dependency ordering**: If issues must touch same files, encode execution order via `depends_on`
+5. **Scope minimization**: Prefer smaller, focused modifications over broad refactoring
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Execute implementation (return plan only)
+2. Use vague criteria ("works correctly", "good performance")
+3. Create circular dependencies
+4. Generate more than 10 tasks per issue
+5. **Bind when multiple solutions exist** - MUST check `solutions.length === 1` before calling `ccw issue bind`
+
+**OUTPUT**:
+1. Write solutions to `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl` (JSONL format)
+2. Single solution → `ccw issue bind <issue-id> <solution-id>`; Multiple → return only
+3. Return JSON with `bound`, `pending_selection`

.claude/agents/issue-queue-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+---
+name: issue-queue-agent
+description: |
+  Solution ordering agent for queue formation with Gemini CLI conflict analysis.
+  Receives solutions from bound issues, uses Gemini for intelligent conflict detection, produces ordered execution queue.
+color: orange
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+**Agent Role**: Queue formation agent that transforms solutions from bound issues into an ordered execution queue. Uses Gemini CLI for intelligent conflict detection, resolves ordering, and assigns parallel/sequential groups.
+
+**Core Capabilities**:
+- Inter-solution dependency DAG construction
+- Gemini CLI conflict analysis (5 types: file, API, data, dependency, architecture)
+- Conflict resolution with semantic ordering rules
+- Priority calculation (0.0-1.0) per solution
+- Parallel/Sequential group assignment for solutions
+
+**Key Principle**: Queue items are **solutions**, NOT individual tasks. Each executor receives a complete solution with all its tasks.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Input & Execution
+
+### 1.1 Input Context
+
+```javascript
+{
+  solutions: [{
+    issue_id: string,      // e.g., "ISS-20251227-001"
+    solution_id: string,   // e.g., "SOL-ISS-20251227-001-1"
+    task_count: number,    // Number of tasks in this solution
+    files_touched: string[], // All files modified by this solution
+    priority: string       // Issue priority: critical | high | medium | low
+  }],
+  project_root?: string,
+  rebuild?: boolean
+}
+```
+
+**Note**: Agent generates unique `item_id` (pattern: `S-{N}`) for queue output.
+
+### 1.2 Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Solution Analysis (15%)
+    | Parse solutions, collect files_touched, build DAG
+Phase 2: Conflict Detection (25%)
+    | Identify all conflict types (file, API, data, dependency, architecture)
+Phase 2.5: Clarification (15%)
+    | Surface ambiguous dependencies, BLOCK until resolved
+Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (20%)
+    | Apply ordering rules, update DAG
+Phase 4: Ordering & Grouping (25%)
+    | Topological sort, assign parallel/sequential groups
+```
+
+---
+
+## 2. Processing Logic
+
+### 2.1 Dependency Graph
+
+**Build DAG from solutions**:
+1. Create node for each solution with `inDegree: 0` and `outEdges: []`
+2. Build file→solutions mapping from `files_touched`
+3. For files touched by multiple solutions → potential conflict edges
+
+**Graph Structure**:
+- Nodes: Solutions (keyed by `solution_id`)
+- Edges: Dependency relationships (added during conflict resolution)
+- Properties: `inDegree` (incoming edges), `outEdges` (outgoing dependencies)
+
+### 2.2 Conflict Detection (Gemini CLI)
+
+Use Gemini CLI for intelligent conflict analysis across all solutions:
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze solutions for conflicts across 5 dimensions
+TASK: • Detect file conflicts (same file modified by multiple solutions)
+      • Detect API conflicts (breaking interface changes)
+      • Detect data conflicts (schema changes to same model)
+      • Detect dependency conflicts (package version mismatches)
+      • Detect architecture conflicts (pattern violations)
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @.workflow/issues/solutions/**/*.jsonl | Solution data: \${SOLUTIONS_JSON}
+EXPECTED: JSON array of conflicts with type, severity, solutions, recommended_order
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Severity: high (API/data) > medium (file/dependency) > low (architecture)
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd .workflow/issues
+```
+
+**Placeholder**: `${SOLUTIONS_JSON}` = serialized solutions array from bound issues
+
+**Conflict Types & Severity**:
+
+| Type | Severity | Trigger |
+|------|----------|---------|
+| `file_conflict` | medium | Multiple solutions modify same file |
+| `api_conflict` | high | Breaking interface changes |
+| `data_conflict` | high | Schema changes to same model |
+| `dependency_conflict` | medium | Package version mismatches |
+| `architecture_conflict` | low | Pattern violations |
+
+**Output per conflict**:
+```json
+{ "type": "...", "severity": "...", "solutions": [...], "recommended_order": [...], "rationale": "..." }
+```
+
+### 2.2.5 Clarification (BLOCKING)
+
+**Purpose**: Surface ambiguous dependencies for user/system clarification
+
+**Trigger Conditions**:
+- High severity conflicts without `recommended_order` from Gemini analysis
+- Circular dependencies detected
+- Multiple valid resolution strategies
+
+**Clarification Generation**:
+
+For each unresolved high-severity conflict:
+1. Generate conflict ID: `CFT-{N}`
+2. Build question: `"{type}: Which solution should execute first?"`
+3. List options with solution summaries (issue title + task count)
+4. Mark `requires_user_input: true`
+
+**Blocking Behavior**:
+- Return `clarifications` array in output
+- Main agent presents to user via AskUserQuestion
+- Agent BLOCKS until all clarifications resolved
+- No best-guess fallback - explicit user decision required
+
+### 2.3 Resolution Rules
+
+| Priority | Rule | Example |
+|----------|------|---------|
+| 1 | Higher issue priority first | critical > high > medium > low |
+| 2 | Foundation solutions first | Solutions with fewer dependencies |
+| 3 | More tasks = higher priority | Solutions with larger impact |
+| 4 | Create before extend | S1:Creates module -> S2:Extends it |
+
+### 2.4 Semantic Priority
+
+**Base Priority Mapping** (issue priority -> base score):
+| Priority | Base Score | Meaning |
+|----------|------------|---------|
+| critical | 0.9 | Highest |
+| high | 0.7 | High |
+| medium | 0.5 | Medium |
+| low | 0.3 | Low |
+
+**Task-count Boost** (applied to base score):
+| Factor | Boost |
+|--------|-------|
+| task_count >= 5 | +0.1 |
+| task_count >= 3 | +0.05 |
+| Foundation scope | +0.1 |
+| Fewer dependencies | +0.05 |
+
+**Formula**: `semantic_priority = clamp(baseScore + sum(boosts), 0.0, 1.0)`
+
+### 2.5 Group Assignment
+
+- **Parallel (P*)**: Solutions with no file overlaps between them
+- **Sequential (S*)**: Solutions that share files must run in order
+
+---
+
+## 3. Output Requirements
+
+### 3.1 Generate Files (Primary)
+
+**Queue files**:
+```
+.workflow/issues/queues/{queue-id}.json   # Full queue with solutions, conflicts, groups
+.workflow/issues/queues/index.json        # Update with new queue entry
+```
+
+Queue ID: Use the Queue ID provided in prompt (do NOT generate new one)
+Queue Item ID format: `S-N` (S-1, S-2, S-3, ...)
+
+### 3.2 Queue File Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
+  "status": "active",
+  "solutions": [
+    {
+      "item_id": "S-1",
+      "issue_id": "ISS-20251227-003",
+      "solution_id": "SOL-ISS-20251227-003-1",
+      "status": "pending",
+      "execution_order": 1,
+      "execution_group": "P1",
+      "depends_on": [],
+      "semantic_priority": 0.8,
+      "files_touched": ["src/auth.ts", "src/utils.ts"],
+      "task_count": 3
+    }
+  ],
+  "conflicts": [
+    {
+      "type": "file_conflict",
+      "file": "src/auth.ts",
+      "solutions": ["S-1", "S-3"],
+      "resolution": "sequential",
+      "resolution_order": ["S-1", "S-3"],
+      "rationale": "S-1 creates auth module, S-3 extends it"
+    }
+  ],
+  "execution_groups": [
+    { "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "solutions": ["S-1", "S-2"], "solution_count": 2 },
+    { "id": "S2", "type": "sequential", "solutions": ["S-3"], "solution_count": 1 }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### 3.3 Return Summary (Brief)
+
+Return brief summaries; full conflict details in separate files:
+
+```json
+{
+  "queue_id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
+  "total_solutions": N,
+  "total_tasks": N,
+  "execution_groups": [{ "id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N }],
+  "conflicts_summary": [{
+    "id": "CFT-001",
+    "type": "api_conflict",
+    "severity": "high",
+    "summary": "Brief 1-line description",
+    "resolution": "sequential",
+    "details_path": ".workflow/issues/conflicts/CFT-001.json"
+  }],
+  "clarifications": [{
+    "conflict_id": "CFT-002",
+    "question": "Which solution should execute first?",
+    "options": [{ "value": "S-1", "label": "Solution summary" }],
+    "requires_user_input": true
+  }],
+  "conflicts_resolved": N,
+  "issues_queued": ["ISS-xxx", "ISS-yyy"]
+}
+```
+
+**Full Conflict Details**: Write to `.workflow/issues/conflicts/{conflict-id}.json`
+
+---
+
+## 4. Quality Standards
+
+### 4.1 Validation Checklist
+
+- [ ] No circular dependencies between solutions
+- [ ] All file conflicts resolved
+- [ ] Solutions in same parallel group have NO file overlaps
+- [ ] Semantic priority calculated for all solutions
+- [ ] Dependencies ordered correctly
+
+### 4.2 Error Handling
+
+| Scenario | Action |
+|----------|--------|
+| Circular dependency | Abort, report cycles |
+| Resolution creates cycle | Flag for manual resolution |
+| Missing solution reference | Skip and warn |
+| Empty solution list | Return empty queue |
+
+### 4.3 Guidelines
+
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
+**ALWAYS**:
+1. **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+2. Build dependency graph before ordering
+2. Detect file overlaps between solutions
+3. Apply resolution rules consistently
+4. Calculate semantic priority for all solutions
+5. Include rationale for conflict resolutions
+6. Validate ordering before output
+
+**NEVER**:
+1. Execute solutions (ordering only)
+2. Ignore circular dependencies
+3. Skip conflict detection
+4. Output invalid DAG
+5. Merge conflicting solutions in parallel group
+6. Split tasks from their solution
+
+**WRITE** (exactly 2 files):
+- `.workflow/issues/queues/{Queue ID}.json` - Full queue with solutions, groups
+- `.workflow/issues/queues/index.json` - Update with new queue entry
+- Use Queue ID from prompt, do NOT generate new one
+
+**RETURN** (summary + unresolved conflicts):
+```json
+{
+  "queue_id": "QUE-xxx",
+  "total_solutions": N,
+  "total_tasks": N,
+  "execution_groups": [{"id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N}],
+  "issues_queued": ["ISS-xxx"],
+  "clarifications": [{"conflict_id": "CFT-1", "question": "...", "options": [...]}]
+}
+```
+- `clarifications`: Only present if unresolved high-severity conflicts exist
+- No markdown, no prose - PURE JSON only

.claude/agents/memory-bridge.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ You are a documentation update coordinator for complex projects. Orchestrate par
 
 ## Core Mission
 
-Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh`. **Every module path must be processed**.
+Execute depth-parallel updates for all modules using `ccw tool exec update_module_claude`. **Every module path must be processed**.
 
 ## Input Context
 
@@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ TodoWrite([
 # 3. Launch parallel jobs (max 4)
 
 # Depth 5 example (Layer 3 - use multi-layer):
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis" "gemini" &
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "multi-layer" "./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development" "gemini" &
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"multi-layer","path":"./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis","tool":"gemini"}' &
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"multi-layer","path":"./.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development","tool":"gemini"}' &
 
 # Depth 1 example (Layer 2 - use single-layer):
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/auth" "gemini" &
-~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "./src/api" "gemini" &
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":"./src/auth","tool":"gemini"}' &
+ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":"./src/api","tool":"gemini"}' &
 # ... up to 4 concurrent jobs
 
 # 4. Wait for all depth jobs to complete
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ Examples:
 
 ## Execution Rules
 
+**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+
 1. **Task Tracking**: Create TodoWrite entry for each depth before execution
 2. **Parallelism**: Max 4 jobs per depth, sequential across depths
 3. **Strategy Assignment**: Assign strategy based on depth:

.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md

@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ You are a test context discovery specialist focused on gathering test coverage i
 
 ## Tool Arsenal
 
+**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+
 ### 1. Session & Implementation Context
 **Tools**:
 - `Read()` - Load session metadata and implementation summaries
@@ -36,10 +38,10 @@ You are a test context discovery specialist focused on gathering test coverage i
 **Use**: Phase 1 source context loading
 
 ### 2. Test Coverage Discovery
-**Primary (Code-Index MCP)**:
-- `mcp__code-index__find_files(pattern)` - Find test files (*.test.*, *.spec.*)
-- `mcp__code-index__search_code_advanced()` - Search test patterns
-- `mcp__code-index__get_file_summary()` - Analyze test structure
+**Primary (CCW CodexLens MCP)**:
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search_files", query="*.test.*")` - Find test files
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="search", query="pattern")` - Search test patterns
+- `mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens(action="symbol", file="path")` - Analyze test structure
 
 **Fallback (CLI)**:
 - `rg` (ripgrep) - Fast test pattern search
@@ -120,9 +122,10 @@ for (const summary_path of summaries) {
 
 **2.1 Existing Test Discovery**:
 ```javascript
-// Method 1: Code-Index MCP (preferred)
-const test_files = mcp__code-index__find_files({
-  patterns: ["*.test.*", "*.spec.*", "*test_*.py", "*_test.go"]
+// Method 1: CodexLens MCP (preferred)
+const test_files = mcp__ccw-tools__codex_lens({
+  action: "search_files",
+  query: "*.test.* OR *.spec.* OR test_*.py OR *_test.go"
 });
 
 // Method 2: Fallback CLI
@@ -397,23 +400,3 @@ function detect_framework_from_config() {
 - ✅ All missing tests catalogued with priority
 - ✅ Execution time < 30 seconds (< 60s for large codebases)
 
-## Integration Points
-
-### Called By
-- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Orchestrator command
-
-### Calls
-- Code-Index MCP tools (preferred)
-- ripgrep/find (fallback)
-- Bash file operations
-
-### Followed By
-- `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Test generation analysis
-
-## Notes
-
-- **Detection-first**: Always check for existing test-context-package before analysis
-- **Code-Index priority**: Use MCP tools when available, fallback to CLI
-- **Framework agnostic**: Supports Jest, Mocha, pytest, RSpec, etc.
-- **Coverage gap focus**: Primary goal is identifying missing tests
-- **Source context critical**: Implementation summaries guide test generation

.claude/agents/test-fix-agent.md

@@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ When task JSON contains `flow_control` field, execute preparation and implementa
 2. **Variable Substitution**: Use `[variable_name]` to reference previous outputs
 3. **Error Handling**: Follow step-specific strategies (`skip_optional`, `fail`, `retry_once`)
 
+**Command-to-Tool Mapping** (for pre_analysis commands):
+```
+"Read(path)"            → Read tool: Read(file_path=path)
+"bash(command)"         → Bash tool: Bash(command=command)
+"Search(pattern,path)"  → Grep tool: Grep(pattern=pattern, path=path)
+"Glob(pattern)"         → Glob tool: Glob(pattern=pattern)
+```
+
 **Implementation Approach** (`flow_control.implementation_approach`):
 When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
 1. **Sequential Execution**: Process steps in order, respecting `depends_on` dependencies
@@ -73,6 +81,12 @@ When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
    - `command`: Optional CLI command (only when explicitly specified)
    - `depends_on`: Array of step numbers that must complete first
    - `output`: Variable name for this step's output
+5. **Execution Mode Selection**:
+   - IF `command` field exists → Execute CLI command via Bash tool
+   - ELSE (no command) → Agent direct execution:
+     - Parse `modification_points` as files to modify
+     - Follow `logic_flow` for test-fix iteration
+     - Use test_commands from flow_control for test execution
 
 
 ### 1. Context Assessment & Test Discovery
@@ -83,17 +97,18 @@ When task JSON contains implementation_approach array:
   - L1 (Unit): `*.test.*`, `*.spec.*` in `__tests__/`, `tests/unit/`
   - L2 (Integration): `tests/integration/`, `*.integration.test.*`
   - L3 (E2E): `tests/e2e/`, `*.e2e.test.*`, `cypress/`, `playwright/`
-- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Extract artifact paths using `jq -r '.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path'`
+- **context-package.json** (CCW Workflow): Use Read tool to get context package from `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
 - Identify test commands from project configuration
 
 ```bash
 # Detect test framework and multi-layered commands
 if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
-    # Extract layer-specific test commands
-    LINT_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts.lint // "eslint ."')
-    UNIT_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:unit"] // .scripts.test')
-    INTEGRATION_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:integration"] // ""')
-    E2E_CMD=$(cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts["test:e2e"] // ""')
+    # Extract layer-specific test commands using Read tool or jq
+    PKG_JSON=$(cat package.json)
+    LINT_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts.lint // "eslint ."')
+    UNIT_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:unit"] // .scripts.test')
+    INTEGRATION_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:integration"] // ""')
+    E2E_CMD=$(echo "$PKG_JSON" | jq -r '.scripts["test:e2e"] // ""')
 elif [ -f "pytest.ini" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
     LINT_CMD="ruff check . || flake8 ."
     UNIT_CMD="pytest tests/unit/"
@@ -142,9 +157,9 @@ run_test_layer "L1-unit" "$UNIT_CMD"
 
 ### 3. Failure Diagnosis & Fixing Loop
 
-**Execution Modes**:
+**Execution Modes** (determined by `flow_control.implementation_approach`):
 
-**A. Manual Mode (Default, meta.use_codex=false)**:
+**A. Agent Mode (Default, no `command` field in steps)**:
 ```
 WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
     1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
@@ -155,17 +170,17 @@ WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
 END WHILE
 ```
 
-**B. Codex Mode (meta.use_codex=true)**:
+**B. CLI Mode (`command` field present in implementation_approach steps)**:
 ```
 WHILE tests are failing AND iterations < max_iterations:
     1. Use Gemini to diagnose failure (bug-fix template)
-    2. Use Codex to apply fixes automatically with resume mechanism
+    2. Execute `command` field (e.g., Codex) to apply fixes automatically
     3. Re-run test suite
     4. Verify fix doesn't break other tests
 END WHILE
 ```
 
-**Codex Resume in Test-Fix Cycle** (when `meta.use_codex=true`):
+**Codex Resume in Test-Fix Cycle** (when step has `command` with Codex):
 - First iteration: Start new Codex session with full context
 - Subsequent iterations: Use `resume --last` to maintain fix history and apply consistent strategies
 
@@ -317,6 +332,7 @@ When generating test results for orchestrator (saved to `.process/test-results.j
 ## Important Reminders
 
 **ALWAYS:**
+- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
 - **Execute tests first** - Understand what's failing before fixing
 - **Diagnose thoroughly** - Find root cause, not just symptoms
 - **Fix minimally** - Change only what's needed to pass tests
@@ -331,6 +347,8 @@ When generating test results for orchestrator (saved to `.process/test-results.j
 - Break existing passing tests
 - Skip final verification
 - Leave tests failing - must achieve 100% pass rate
+- Use `run_in_background` for Bash() commands - always set `run_in_background=false` to ensure tests run in foreground for proper output capture
+- Use complex bash pipe chains (`cmd | grep | awk | sed`) - prefer dedicated tools (Read, Grep, Glob) for file operations and content extraction; simple single-pipe commands are acceptable when necessary
 
 ## Quality Certification
 

.claude/agents/ui-design-agent.md

@@ -217,11 +217,6 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
 
 ### Structure Optimization
 
-**Layout Structure Benefits**:
-- Eliminates redundancy between structure and styling
-- Layout properties co-located with DOM elements
-- Responsive overrides apply directly to affected elements
-- Single source of truth for each element
 
 **Component State Coverage**:
 - Interactive components (button, input, dropdown) MUST define: default, hover, focus, active, disabled
@@ -289,6 +284,8 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
 
 ### ALWAYS
 
+**Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
+
 **W3C Format Compliance**: ✅ Include $schema in all token files | ✅ Use $type metadata for all tokens | ✅ Use $value wrapper for color (light/dark), duration, easing | ✅ Validate token structure against W3C spec
 
 **Pattern Recognition**: ✅ Identify pattern from [TASK_TYPE_IDENTIFIER] first | ✅ Apply pattern-specific execution rules | ✅ Follow autonomy level
@@ -323,270 +320,21 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
 
 ### design-tokens.json
 
+**Template Reference**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/ui-design/systems/design-tokens.json`
+
 **Format**: W3C Design Tokens Community Group Specification
 
-**Schema Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
-  "name": "string - Token set name",
-  "description": "string - Token set description",
-
-  "color": {
-    "background": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" }, "$description": "optional" },
-    "foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-    "card": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-    "card-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-    "border": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-    "input": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-    "ring": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-
-    "interactive": {
-      "primary": {
-        "default": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-        "hover": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-        "active": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-        "disabled": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-        "foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } }
-      },
-      "secondary": { "/* Same structure as primary */" },
-      "accent": { "/* Same structure (no disabled state) */" },
-      "destructive": { "/* Same structure (no active/disabled states) */" }
-    },
-
-    "muted": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-    "muted-foreground": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-
-    "chart": {
-      "1": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-      "2": { "/* ... */" },
-      "3": { "/* ... */" },
-      "4": { "/* ... */" },
-      "5": { "/* ... */" }
-    },
-
-    "sidebar": {
-      "background": { "$type": "color", "$value": { "light": "oklch(...)", "dark": "oklch(...)" } },
-      "foreground": { "/* ... */" },
-      "primary": { "/* ... */" },
-      "primary-foreground": { "/* ... */" },
-      "accent": { "/* ... */" },
-      "accent-foreground": { "/* ... */" },
-      "border": { "/* ... */" },
-      "ring": { "/* ... */" }
-    }
-  },
-
-  "typography": {
-    "font_families": {
-      "sans": "string - 'Font Name', fallback1, fallback2",
-      "serif": "string",
-      "mono": "string"
-    },
-    "font_sizes": {
-      "xs": "0.75rem",
-      "sm": "0.875rem",
-      "base": "1rem",
-      "lg": "1.125rem",
-      "xl": "1.25rem",
-      "2xl": "1.5rem",
-      "3xl": "1.875rem",
-      "4xl": "2.25rem"
-    },
-    "line_heights": {
-      "tight": "number",
-      "normal": "number",
-      "relaxed": "number"
-    },
-    "letter_spacing": {
-      "tight": "string",
-      "normal": "string",
-      "wide": "string"
-    },
-    "combinations": [
-      {
-        "name": "h1|h2|h3|h4|h5|h6|body|caption",
-        "font_family": "sans|serif|mono",
-        "font_size": "string - reference to font_sizes",
-        "font_weight": "number - 400|500|600|700",
-        "line_height": "string",
-        "letter_spacing": "string"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-
-  "spacing": {
-    "0": "0",
-    "1": "0.25rem",
-    "2": "0.5rem",
-    "/* Systematic scale: 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 */"
-  },
-
-  "opacity": {
-    "disabled": "0.5",
-    "hover": "0.8",
-    "active": "1"
-  },
-
-  "shadows": {
-    "2xs": "string - CSS shadow value",
-    "xs": "string",
-    "sm": "string",
-    "DEFAULT": "string",
-    "md": "string",
-    "lg": "string",
-    "xl": "string",
-    "2xl": "string"
-  },
-
-  "border_radius": {
-    "sm": "string - calc() or fixed",
-    "md": "string",
-    "lg": "string",
-    "xl": "string",
-    "DEFAULT": "string"
-  },
-
-  "breakpoints": {
-    "sm": "640px",
-    "md": "768px",
-    "lg": "1024px",
-    "xl": "1280px",
-    "2xl": "1536px"
-  },
-
-  "component": {
-    "/* COMPONENT PATTERN - Apply to: button, card, input, dialog, dropdown, toast, accordion, tabs, switch, checkbox, badge, alert */": {
-      "$type": "component",
-      "base": {
-        "/* Layout properties using camelCase */": "value or {token.path}",
-        "display": "inline-flex|flex|block",
-        "alignItems": "center",
-        "borderRadius": "{border_radius.md}",
-        "transition": "{transitions.default}"
-      },
-      "size": {
-        "small": { "height": "32px", "padding": "{spacing.2} {spacing.3}", "fontSize": "{typography.font_sizes.xs}" },
-        "default": { "height": "40px", "padding": "{spacing.2} {spacing.4}" },
-        "large": { "height": "48px", "padding": "{spacing.3} {spacing.6}", "fontSize": "{typography.font_sizes.base}" }
-      },
-      "variant": {
-        "variantName": {
-          "default": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.default}", "color": "{color.interactive.primary.foreground}" },
-          "hover": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.hover}" },
-          "active": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.active}" },
-          "disabled": { "backgroundColor": "{color.interactive.primary.disabled}", "opacity": "{opacity.disabled}", "cursor": "not-allowed" },
-          "focus": { "outline": "2px solid {color.ring}", "outlineOffset": "2px" }
-        }
-      },
-      "state": {
-        "/* For stateful components (dialog, accordion, etc.) */": {
-          "open": { "animation": "{animation.name.component-open} {animation.duration.normal} {animation.easing.ease-out}" },
-          "closed": { "animation": "{animation.name.component-close} {animation.duration.normal} {animation.easing.ease-in}" }
-        }
-      }
-    }
-  },
-
-  "elevation": {
-    "$type": "elevation",
-    "base": { "$value": "0" },
-    "overlay": { "$value": "40" },
-    "dropdown": { "$value": "50" },
-    "dialog": { "$value": "50" },
-    "tooltip": { "$value": "60" }
-  },
-
-  "_metadata": {
-    "version": "string - W3C version or custom version",
-    "created": "ISO timestamp - 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
-    "source": "code-import|explore|text",
-    "theme_colors_guide": {
-      "description": "Theme colors are the core brand identity colors that define the visual hierarchy and emotional tone of the design system",
-      "primary": {
-        "role": "Main brand color",
-        "usage": "Primary actions (CTAs, key interactive elements, navigation highlights, primary buttons)",
-        "contrast_requirement": "WCAG AA - 4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI components"
-      },
-      "secondary": {
-        "role": "Supporting brand color",
-        "usage": "Secondary actions and complementary elements (less prominent buttons, secondary navigation, supporting features)",
-        "principle": "Should complement primary without competing for attention"
-      },
-      "accent": {
-        "role": "Highlight color for emphasis",
-        "usage": "Attention-grabbing elements used sparingly (badges, notifications, special promotions, highlights)",
-        "principle": "Should create strong visual contrast to draw focus"
-      },
-      "destructive": {
-        "role": "Error and destructive action color",
-        "usage": "Delete buttons, error messages, critical warnings",
-        "principle": "Must signal danger or caution clearly"
-      },
-      "harmony_note": "All theme colors must work harmoniously together and align with brand identity. In multi-file extraction, prioritize definitions with semantic comments explaining brand intent."
-    },
-    "conflicts": [
-      {
-        "token_name": "string - which token has conflicts",
-        "category": "string - colors|typography|etc",
-        "definitions": [
-          {
-            "value": "string - token value",
-            "source_file": "string - absolute path",
-            "line_number": "number",
-            "context": "string - surrounding comment or null",
-            "semantic_intent": "string - interpretation of definition"
-          }
-        ],
-        "selected_value": "string - final chosen value",
-        "selection_reason": "string - why this value was chosen"
-      }
-    ],
-    "code_snippets": [
-      {
-        "category": "colors|typography|spacing|shadows|border_radius|component",
-        "token_name": "string - which token this snippet defines",
-        "source_file": "string - absolute path",
-        "line_start": "number",
-        "line_end": "number",
-        "snippet": "string - complete code block",
-        "context_type": "css-variable|css-class|js-object|scss-variable|etc"
-      }
-    ],
-    "usage_recommendations": {
-      "typography": {
-        "common_sizes": {
-          "small_text": "sm (0.875rem)",
-          "body_text": "base (1rem)",
-          "heading": "2xl-4xl"
-        },
-        "common_combinations": [
-          {
-            "name": "Heading + Body",
-            "heading": "2xl",
-            "body": "base",
-            "use_case": "Article sections"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "spacing": {
-        "size_guide": {
-          "tight": "1-2 (0.25rem-0.5rem)",
-          "normal": "4-6 (1rem-1.5rem)",
-          "loose": "8-12 (2rem-3rem)"
-        },
-        "common_patterns": [
-          {
-            "pattern": "padding-4 margin-bottom-6",
-            "use_case": "Card content spacing",
-            "pixel_value": "1rem padding, 1.5rem margin"
-          }
-        ]
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
+**Structure Overview**:
+- **color**: Base colors, interactive states (primary, secondary, accent, destructive), muted, chart, sidebar
+- **typography**: Font families, sizes, line heights, letter spacing, combinations
+- **spacing**: Systematic scale (0-64, multiples of 0.25rem)
+- **opacity**: disabled, hover, active
+- **shadows**: 2xs to 2xl (8-tier system)
+- **border_radius**: sm to xl + DEFAULT
+- **breakpoints**: sm to 2xl
+- **component**: 12+ components with base, size, variant, state structures
+- **elevation**: z-index values for layered components
+- **_metadata**: version, created, source, theme_colors_guide, conflicts, code_snippets, usage_recommendations
 
 **Required Components** (12+ components, use pattern above):
 - **button**: 5 variants (primary, secondary, destructive, outline, ghost) + 3 sizes + states (default, hover, active, disabled, focus)
@@ -637,136 +385,26 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
 
 ### layout-templates.json
 
+**Template Reference**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/ui-design/systems/layout-templates.json`
+
 **Optimization**: Unified structure combining DOM and styling into single hierarchy
 
-**Schema Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
-  "templates": [
-    {
-      "target": "string - page/component name (e.g., hero-section, product-card)",
-      "description": "string - layout description",
-      "component_type": "universal|specialized",
-      "device_type": "mobile|tablet|desktop|responsive",
-      "layout_strategy": "string - grid-3col|flex-row|stack|sidebar|etc",
-
-      "structure": {
-        "tag": "string - HTML5 semantic tag (header|nav|main|section|article|aside|footer|div|etc)",
-        "attributes": {
-          "class": "string - semantic class name",
-          "role": "string - ARIA role (navigation|main|complementary|etc)",
-          "aria-label": "string - ARIA label",
-          "aria-describedby": "string - ARIA describedby",
-          "data-state": "string - data attributes for state management (open|closed|etc)"
-        },
-        "layout": {
-          "/* LAYOUT PROPERTIES ONLY - Use camelCase for property names */": "",
-          "display": "grid|flex|block|inline-flex",
-          "grid-template-columns": "{spacing.*} or CSS value (repeat(3, 1fr))",
-          "grid-template-rows": "string",
-          "gap": "{spacing.*}",
-          "padding": "{spacing.*}",
-          "margin": "{spacing.*}",
-          "alignItems": "start|center|end|stretch",
-          "justifyContent": "start|center|end|space-between|space-around",
-          "flexDirection": "row|column",
-          "flexWrap": "wrap|nowrap",
-          "position": "relative|absolute|fixed|sticky",
-          "top|right|bottom|left": "string",
-          "width": "string",
-          "height": "string",
-          "maxWidth": "string",
-          "minHeight": "string"
-        },
-        "responsive": {
-          "/* ONLY properties that CHANGE at each breakpoint - NO repetition */": "",
-          "sm": {
-            "grid-template-columns": "1fr",
-            "padding": "{spacing.4}"
-          },
-          "md": {
-            "grid-template-columns": "repeat(2, 1fr)",
-            "gap": "{spacing.6}"
-          },
-          "lg": {
-            "grid-template-columns": "repeat(3, 1fr)"
-          }
-        },
-        "children": [
-          {
-            "/* Recursive structure - same fields as parent */": "",
-            "tag": "string",
-            "attributes": {},
-            "layout": {},
-            "responsive": {},
-            "children": [],
-            "content": "string or {{placeholder}}"
-          }
-        ],
-        "content": "string - text content or {{placeholder}} for dynamic content"
-      },
-
-      "accessibility": {
-        "patterns": [
-          "string - ARIA patterns used (e.g., WAI-ARIA Tabs pattern, Dialog pattern)"
-        ],
-        "keyboard_navigation": [
-          "string - keyboard shortcuts (e.g., Tab/Shift+Tab navigation, Escape to close)"
-        ],
-        "focus_management": "string - focus trap strategy, initial focus target",
-        "screen_reader_notes": [
-          "string - screen reader announcements (e.g., Dialog opened, Tab selected)"
-        ]
-      },
-
-      "usage_guide": {
-        "common_sizes": {
-          "small": {
-            "dimensions": "string - e.g., px-3 py-1.5 (height: ~32px)",
-            "use_case": "string - Compact UI, mobile views"
-          },
-          "medium": {
-            "dimensions": "string - e.g., px-4 py-2 (height: ~40px)",
-            "use_case": "string - Default size for most contexts"
-          },
-          "large": {
-            "dimensions": "string - e.g., px-6 py-3 (height: ~48px)",
-            "use_case": "string - Prominent CTAs, hero sections"
-          }
-        },
-        "variant_recommendations": {
-          "variant_name": {
-            "description": "string - when to use this variant",
-            "typical_actions": ["string - action examples"]
-          }
-        },
-        "usage_context": [
-          "string - typical usage scenarios (e.g., Landing page hero, Product listing grid)"
-        ],
-        "accessibility_tips": [
-          "string - accessibility best practices (e.g., Ensure heading hierarchy, Add aria-label)"
-        ]
-      },
-
-      "extraction_metadata": {
-        "source": "code-import|explore|text",
-        "created": "ISO timestamp",
-        "code_snippets": [
-          {
-            "component_name": "string - which layout component",
-            "source_file": "string - absolute path",
-            "line_start": "number",
-            "line_end": "number",
-            "snippet": "string - complete HTML/CSS/JS code block",
-            "context_type": "html-structure|css-utility|react-component|vue-component|etc"
-          }
-        ]
-      }
-    }
-  ]
-}
-```
+**Structure Overview**:
+- **templates[]**: Array of layout templates
+  - **target**: page/component name (hero-section, product-card)
+  - **component_type**: universal | specialized
+  - **device_type**: mobile | tablet | desktop | responsive
+  - **layout_strategy**: grid-3col, flex-row, stack, sidebar, etc.
+  - **structure**: Unified DOM + layout hierarchy
+    - **tag**: HTML5 semantic tags
+    - **attributes**: class, role, aria-*, data-state
+    - **layout**: Layout properties only (display, grid, flex, position, spacing) using {token.path}
+    - **responsive**: Breakpoint-specific overrides (ONLY changed properties)
+    - **children**: Recursive structure
+    - **content**: Text or {{placeholder}}
+  - **accessibility**: patterns, keyboard_navigation, focus_management, screen_reader_notes
+  - **usage_guide**: common_sizes, variant_recommendations, usage_context, accessibility_tips
+  - **extraction_metadata**: source, created, code_snippets
 
 **Field Rules**:
 - $schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification
@@ -784,149 +422,25 @@ You execute 6 distinct task types organized into 3 patterns. Each task includes
 - usage_guide OPTIONAL for specialized components (can be simplified or omitted)
 - extraction_metadata.code_snippets ONLY present in Code Import mode
 
-**Structure Optimization Benefits**:
-- Eliminates redundancy between dom_structure and css_layout_rules
-- Layout properties are co-located with corresponding DOM elements
-- Responsive overrides apply directly to the element they affect
-- Single source of truth for each element's structure and layout
-- Easier to maintain and understand hierarchy
+
 
 ### animation-tokens.json
 
-**Schema Structure**:
-```json
-{
-  "$schema": "https://tr.designtokens.org/format/",
+**Template Reference**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/ui-design/systems/animation-tokens.json`
 
-  "duration": {
-    "$type": "duration",
-    "instant": { "$value": "0ms" },
-    "fast": { "$value": "150ms" },
-    "normal": { "$value": "300ms" },
-    "slow": { "$value": "500ms" },
-    "slower": { "$value": "1000ms" }
-  },
-
-  "easing": {
-    "$type": "cubicBezier",
-    "linear": { "$value": "linear" },
-    "ease-in": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 1, 1)" },
-    "ease-out": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0, 0, 0.2, 1)" },
-    "ease-in-out": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1)" },
-    "spring": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.55, 0.265, 1.55)" },
-    "bounce": { "$value": "cubic-bezier(0.68, -0.6, 0.32, 1.6)" }
-  },
-
-  "keyframes": {
-    "/* PATTERN: Define pairs (in/out, open/close, enter/exit) */": {
-      "0%": { "/* CSS properties */": "value" },
-      "100%": { "/* CSS properties */": "value" }
-    },
-    "/* Required keyframes for components: */": "",
-    "fade-in": { "0%": { "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "opacity": "1" } },
-    "fade-out": { "/* reverse of fade-in */" },
-    "slide-up": { "0%": { "transform": "translateY(10px)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" } },
-    "slide-down": { "/* reverse direction */" },
-    "scale-in": { "0%": { "transform": "scale(0.95)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "scale(1)", "opacity": "1" } },
-    "scale-out": { "/* reverse of scale-in */" },
-    "accordion-down": { "0%": { "height": "0", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "height": "var(--radix-accordion-content-height)", "opacity": "1" } },
-    "accordion-up": { "/* reverse */" },
-    "dialog-open": { "0%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -48%) scale(0.96)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "translate(-50%, -50%) scale(1)", "opacity": "1" } },
-    "dialog-close": { "/* reverse */" },
-    "dropdown-open": { "0%": { "transform": "scale(0.95) translateY(-4px)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "scale(1) translateY(0)", "opacity": "1" } },
-    "dropdown-close": { "/* reverse */" },
-    "toast-enter": { "0%": { "transform": "translateX(100%)", "opacity": "0" }, "100%": { "transform": "translateX(0)", "opacity": "1" } },
-    "toast-exit": { "/* reverse */" },
-    "spin": { "0%": { "transform": "rotate(0deg)" }, "100%": { "transform": "rotate(360deg)" } },
-    "pulse": { "0%, 100%": { "opacity": "1" }, "50%": { "opacity": "0.5" } }
-  },
-
-  "interactions": {
-    "/* PATTERN: Define for each interactive component state */": {
-      "property": "string - CSS properties (comma-separated)",
-      "duration": "{duration.*}",
-      "easing": "{easing.*}"
-    },
-    "button-hover": { "property": "background-color, transform", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-out}" },
-    "button-active": { "property": "transform", "duration": "{duration.instant}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in}" },
-    "card-hover": { "property": "box-shadow, transform", "duration": "{duration.normal}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}" },
-    "input-focus": { "property": "border-color, box-shadow", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-out}" },
-    "dropdown-toggle": { "property": "opacity, transform", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-out}" },
-    "accordion-toggle": { "property": "height, opacity", "duration": "{duration.normal}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}" },
-    "dialog-toggle": { "property": "opacity, transform", "duration": "{duration.normal}", "easing": "{easing.spring}" },
-    "tabs-switch": { "property": "color, border-color", "duration": "{duration.fast}", "easing": "{easing.ease-in-out}" }
-  },
-
-  "transitions": {
-    "default": { "$value": "all {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in-out}" },
-    "colors": { "$value": "color {duration.fast} {easing.linear}, background-color {duration.fast} {easing.linear}" },
-    "transform": { "$value": "transform {duration.normal} {easing.spring}" },
-    "opacity": { "$value": "opacity {duration.fast} {easing.linear}" },
-    "all-smooth": { "$value": "all {duration.slow} {easing.ease-in-out}" }
-  },
-
-  "component_animations": {
-    "/* PATTERN: Map each component to its animations - MUST match design-tokens.json component list */": {
-      "stateOrInteraction": {
-        "animation": "keyframe-name {duration.*} {easing.*} OR none",
-        "transition": "{interactions.*} OR none"
-      }
-    },
-    "button": {
-      "hover": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.button-hover}" },
-      "active": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.button-active}" }
-    },
-    "card": {
-      "hover": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.card-hover}" }
-    },
-    "input": {
-      "focus": { "animation": "none", "transition": "{interactions.input-focus}" }
-    },
-    "dialog": {
-      "open": { "animation": "dialog-open {duration.normal} {easing.spring}" },
-      "close": { "animation": "dialog-close {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
-    },
-    "dropdown": {
-      "open": { "animation": "dropdown-open {duration.fast} {easing.ease-out}" },
-      "close": { "animation": "dropdown-close {duration.fast} {easing.ease-in}" }
-    },
-    "toast": {
-      "enter": { "animation": "toast-enter {duration.normal} {easing.ease-out}" },
-      "exit": { "animation": "toast-exit {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
-    },
-    "accordion": {
-      "open": { "animation": "accordion-down {duration.normal} {easing.ease-out}" },
-      "close": { "animation": "accordion-up {duration.normal} {easing.ease-in}" }
-    },
-    "/* Add mappings for: tabs, switch, checkbox, badge, alert */" : {}
-  },
-
-  "accessibility": {
-    "prefers_reduced_motion": {
-      "duration": "0ms",
-      "keyframes": {},
-      "note": "Disable animations when user prefers reduced motion",
-      "css_rule": "@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { *, *::before, *::after { animation-duration: 0.01ms !important; animation-iteration-count: 1 !important; transition-duration: 0.01ms !important; } }"
-    }
-  },
-
-  "_metadata": {
-    "version": "string",
-    "created": "ISO timestamp",
-    "source": "code-import|explore|text",
-    "code_snippets": [
-      {
-        "animation_name": "string - keyframe/transition name",
-        "source_file": "string - absolute path",
-        "line_start": "number",
-        "line_end": "number",
-        "snippet": "string - complete @keyframes or transition code",
-        "context_type": "css-keyframes|css-transition|js-animation|scss-animation|etc"
-      }
-    ]
-  }
-}
-```
+**Structure Overview**:
+- **duration**: instant (0ms), fast (150ms), normal (300ms), slow (500ms), slower (1000ms)
+- **easing**: linear, ease-in, ease-out, ease-in-out, spring, bounce
+- **keyframes**: Animation definitions in pairs (in/out, open/close, enter/exit)
+  - Required: fade-in/out, slide-up/down, scale-in/out, accordion-down/up, dialog-open/close, dropdown-open/close, toast-enter/exit, spin, pulse
+- **interactions**: Component interaction animations with property, duration, easing
+  - button-hover/active, card-hover, input-focus, dropdown-toggle, accordion-toggle, dialog-toggle, tabs-switch
+- **transitions**: default, colors, transform, opacity, all-smooth
+- **component_animations**: Maps components to animations (MUST match design-tokens.json components)
+  - State-based: dialog, dropdown, toast, accordion (use keyframes)
+  - Interaction: button, card, input, tabs (use transitions)
+- **accessibility**: prefers_reduced_motion with CSS rule
+- **_metadata**: version, created, source, code_snippets
 
 **Field Rules**:
 - $schema MUST reference W3C Design Tokens format specification

.claude/agents/universal-executor.md

@@ -120,7 +120,11 @@ Before completing any task, verify:
 - Make assumptions - verify with existing materials
 - Skip quality verification steps
 
+**Bash Tool**:
+- Use `run_in_background=false` for all Bash/CLI calls to ensure foreground execution
+
 **ALWAYS:**
+- **Search Tool Priority**: ACE (`mcp__ace-tool__search_context`) → CCW (`mcp__ccw-tools__smart_search`) / Built-in (`Grep`, `Glob`, `Read`)
 - Verify resource/dependency existence before referencing
 - Execute tasks systematically and incrementally
 - Test and validate work thoroughly

.claude/cli-settings.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "defaultTool": "gemini",
+  "promptFormat": "plain",
+  "smartContext": {
+    "enabled": false,
+    "maxFiles": 10
+  },
+  "nativeResume": true,
+  "recursiveQuery": true,
+  "cache": {
+    "injectionMode": "auto",
+    "defaultPrefix": "",
+    "defaultSuffix": ""
+  },
+  "codeIndexMcp": "ace",
+  "$schema": "./cli-settings.schema.json"
+}

.claude/commands/cli/analyze.md

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
----
-name: analyze
-description: Read-only codebase analysis using Gemini (default), Qwen, or Codex with auto-pattern detection and template selection
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] analysis target"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# CLI Analyze Command (/cli:analyze)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Quick codebase analysis using CLI tools. **Read-only - does NOT modify code**.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **gemini** (default) - Best for code analysis
-- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
-- **codex** - Alternative for deep analysis
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Use `/enhance-prompt` for context-aware enhancement
-- `<analysis-target>` - Description of what to analyze
-
-## Tool Usage
-
-**Gemini** (Primary):
-```bash
---tool gemini  # or omit (default)
-```
-
-**Qwen** (Fallback):
-```bash
---tool qwen
-```
-
-**Codex** (Alternative):
-```bash
---tool codex
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated analysis:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Codebase analysis with pattern detection",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${analysis_target}
-    Mode: analyze
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-
-    Execute codebase analysis with auto-pattern detection:
-
-    1. Context Discovery:
-       - Extract keywords from analysis target
-       - Auto-detect file patterns (auth→auth files, component→components, etc.)
-       - Discover additional relevant files using MCP
-       - Build comprehensive file context
-
-    2. Template Selection:
-       - Auto-select analysis template based on keywords
-       - Apply appropriate analysis methodology
-       - Include @CLAUDE.md for project context
-
-    3. CLI Command Construction:
-       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for deep analysis)
-       - Context: @CLAUDE.md + auto-detected patterns + discovered files
-       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
-       - Expected: Insights, recommendations, pattern analysis
-
-    4. Execution & Output:
-       - Execute CLI tool with assembled context
-       - Generate comprehensive analysis report
-       - Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
-  `
-)
-```
-
-## Core Rules
-
-- **Read-only**: Analyzes code, does NOT modify files
-- **Auto-pattern**: Detects file patterns from keywords (auth→auth files, component→components, API→api/routes, test→test files)
-- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/chat.md

@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
----
-name: chat
-description: Read-only Q&A interaction with Gemini/Qwen/Codex for codebase questions with automatic context inference
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] inquiry"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# CLI Chat Command (/cli:chat)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Direct Q&A interaction with CLI tools for codebase analysis. **Read-only - does NOT modify code**.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **gemini** (default) - Best for Q&A and explanations
-- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
-- **codex** - Alternative for technical deep-dives
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance inquiry with `/enhance-prompt`
-- `<inquiry>` (Required) - Question or analysis request
-
-## Tool Usage
-
-**Gemini** (Primary):
-```bash
---tool gemini  # or omit (default)
-```
-
-**Qwen** (Fallback):
-```bash
---tool qwen
-```
-
-**Codex** (Alternative):
-```bash
---tool codex
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated Q&A:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Codebase Q&A with intelligent context discovery",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${inquiry}
-    Mode: chat
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-
-    Execute codebase Q&A with intelligent context discovery:
-
-    1. Context Discovery:
-       - Parse inquiry to identify relevant topics/keywords
-       - Discover related files using MCP/ripgrep (prioritize precision)
-       - Include @CLAUDE.md + discovered files
-       - Validate context relevance to question
-
-    2. CLI Command Construction:
-       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for deep dives)
-       - Context: @CLAUDE.md + discovered file patterns
-       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
-       - Expected: Clear, accurate answer with code references
-
-    3. Execution & Output:
-       - Execute CLI tool with assembled context
-       - Validate answer completeness
-       - Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
-  `
-)
-```
-
-## Core Rules
-
-- **Read-only**: Provides answers, does NOT modify code
-- **Context**: `@CLAUDE.md` + inferred or all files (`@**/*`)
-- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/cli-init.md

@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ target/
 ### Step 2: Workspace Analysis (MANDATORY FIRST)
 ```bash
 # Analyze workspace structure
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh json)
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{"format":"json"}')
 ```
 
 ### Step 3: Technology Detection
@@ -428,15 +428,6 @@ docker-compose.override.yml
 /cli:cli-init --tool all --preview
 ```
 
-## Key Benefits
-
-- **Automatic Detection**: No manual configuration needed
-- **Multi-Tool Support**: Configure Gemini and Qwen simultaneously
-- **Technology Aware**: Rules adapted to actual project stack
-- **Maintainable**: Clear sections for easy customization
-- **Consistent**: Follows gitignore syntax standards
-- **Safe**: Creates backups of existing files
-- **Flexible**: Initialize specific tools or all at once
 
 ## Tool Selection Guide
 

.claude/commands/cli/codex-execute.md

@@ -1,519 +0,0 @@
----
-name: codex-execute
-description: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition into grouped subtasks using resume mechanism for context continuity
-argument-hint: "[--verify-git] task description or task-id"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# CLI Codex Execute Command (/cli:codex-execute)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Automated task decomposition and sequential execution with Codex, using `codex exec "..." resume --last` mechanism for continuity between subtasks.
-
-**Input**: User description or task ID (automatically loads from `.task/[ID].json` if applicable)
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-```
-Task Input → Analyze Dependencies → Create Task Flow Diagram →
-Decompose into Subtask Groups → TodoWrite Tracking →
-For Each Subtask Group:
-  For First Subtask in Group:
-    0. Stage existing changes (git add -A) if valid git repo
-    1. Execute with Codex (new session)
-    2. [Optional] Git verification
-    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
-  For Related Subtasks in Same Group:
-    0. Stage changes from previous subtask
-    1. Execute with `codex exec "..." resume --last` (continue session)
-    2. [Optional] Git verification
-    3. Mark complete in TodoWrite
-→ Final Summary
-```
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `<input>` (Required): Task description or task ID (e.g., "implement auth" or "IMPL-001")
-  - If input matches task ID format, loads from `.task/[ID].json`
-  - Otherwise, uses input as task description
-- `--verify-git` (Optional): Verify git status after each subtask completion
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-### Phase 1: Input Processing & Task Flow Analysis
-
-1. **Parse Input**:
-   - Check if input matches task ID pattern (e.g., `IMPL-001`, `TASK-123`)
-   - If yes: Load from `.task/[ID].json` and extract requirements
-   - If no: Use input as task description directly
-
-2. **Analyze Dependencies & Create Task Flow Diagram**:
-   - Analyze task complexity and scope
-   - Identify dependencies and relationships between subtasks
-   - Create visual task flow diagram showing:
-     - Independent task groups (parallel execution possible)
-     - Sequential dependencies (must use resume)
-     - Branching logic (conditional paths)
-   - Display flow diagram for user review
-
-**Task Flow Diagram Format**:
-```
-[Group A: Auth Core]
-  A1: Create user model ──┐
-  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
-                          │
-[Group B: API Layer]      │
-  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
-  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
-
-[Group C: Testing]
-  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
-  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
-```
-
-**Diagram Symbols**:
-- `──►` Sequential dependency (must resume previous session)
-- `─┐` Branch point (multiple paths)
-- `─┘` Merge point (wait for completion)
-- `[resume]` Use `codex exec "..." resume --last`
-- `[new session]` Start fresh Codex session
-
-3. **Decompose into Subtask Groups**:
-   - Group related subtasks that share context
-   - Break down into 3-8 subtasks total
-   - Assign each subtask to a group
-   - Create TodoWrite tracker with groups
-   - Display decomposition for user review
-
-**Decomposition Criteria**:
-- Each subtask: 5-15 minutes completable
-- Clear, testable outcomes
-- Explicit dependencies
-- Focused file scope (1-5 files per subtask)
-- **Group coherence**: Subtasks in same group share context/files
-
-### File Discovery for Task Decomposition
-
-Use `rg` or MCP tools to discover relevant files, then group by domain:
-
-**Workflow**: Discover → Analyze scope → Group by files → Create task flow
-
-**Example**:
-```bash
-# Discover files
-rg "authentication" --files-with-matches --type ts
-
-# Group by domain
-# Group A: src/auth/model.ts, src/auth/schema.ts
-# Group B: src/api/auth.ts, src/middleware/auth.ts
-# Group C: tests/auth/*.test.ts
-
-# Each group becomes a session with related subtasks
-```
-
-File patterns: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
-
-### Phase 2: Group-Based Execution
-
-**Pre-Execution Git Staging** (if valid git repository):
-```bash
-# Stage all current changes before codex execution
-# This makes codex changes clearly visible in git diff
-git add -A
-git status --short
-```
-
-**For First Subtask in Each Group** (New Session):
-```bash
-# Start new Codex session for independent task group
-codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [group goal]
-TASK: [subtask description - first in group]
-CONTEXT: @{relevant_files} @CLAUDE.md
-EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
-RULES: [constraints]
-Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**For Related Subtasks in Same Group** (Resume Session):
-```bash
-# Stage changes from previous subtask (if valid git repository)
-git add -A
-
-# Resume session ONLY for subtasks in same group
-codex exec "
-CONTINUE IN SAME GROUP:
-Group [X]: [group name] - Subtask N of M
-
-PURPOSE: [continuation goal within group]
-TASK: [subtask N description]
-CONTEXT: Previous work in this group completed, now focus on @{new_relevant_files}
-EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
-RULES: Build on previous subtask in group, maintain consistency
-" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**For First Subtask in Different Group** (New Session):
-```bash
-# Stage changes from previous group
-git add -A
-
-# Start NEW session for different group (no resume)
-codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: [new group goal]
-TASK: [subtask description - first in new group]
-CONTEXT: @{different_files} @CLAUDE.md
-EXPECTED: [specific deliverables]
-RULES: [constraints]
-Group [Y]: [new group name] - Subtask 1 of N in this group
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-**Resume Decision Logic**:
-```
-if (subtask.group == previous_subtask.group):
-    use `codex exec "..." resume --last`  # Continue session
-else:
-    use `codex -C [dir] exec "..."`       # New session
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Verification (if --verify-git enabled)
-
-After each subtask completion:
-```bash
-# Check git status
-git status --short
-
-# Verify expected changes
-git diff --stat
-
-# Optional: Check for untracked files that should be committed
-git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
-```
-
-**Verification Checks**:
-- Files modified match subtask scope
-- No unexpected changes in unrelated files
-- No merge conflicts or errors
-- Code compiles/runs (if applicable)
-
-### Phase 4: TodoWrite Tracking with Groups
-
-**Initial Setup with Task Flow**:
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    // Display task flow diagram first
-    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
-
-    // Group A subtasks (will use resume within group)
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
-
-    // Group B subtasks (new session, then resume within group)
-    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 1" },
-    { content: "[Group B] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group B subtask 2" },
-
-    // Group C subtasks (new session)
-    { content: "[Group C] Subtask 1: [description] [new session]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing Group C subtask 1" },
-
-    { content: "Final verification and summary", status: "pending", activeForm: "Verifying and summarizing" }
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-**After Each Subtask**:
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    { content: "Task Flow Analysis Complete - See diagram above", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing task flow" },
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 1: [description]", status: "completed", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 1" },
-    { content: "[Group A] Subtask 2: [description] [resume]", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Executing Group A subtask 2" },
-    // ... update status
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-## Codex Resume Mechanism
-
-**Why Group-Based Resume?**
-- **Within Group**: Maintains conversation context for related subtasks
-  - Codex remembers previous decisions and patterns
-  - Reduces context repetition
-  - Ensures consistency in implementation style
-- **Between Groups**: Fresh session for independent tasks
-  - Avoids context pollution from unrelated work
-  - Prevents confusion when switching domains
-  - Maintains focused attention on current group
-
-**How It Works**:
-1. **First subtask in Group A**: Creates new Codex session
-2. **Subsequent subtasks in Group A**: Use `codex resume --last` to continue session
-3. **First subtask in Group B**: Creates NEW Codex session (no resume)
-4. **Subsequent subtasks in Group B**: Use `codex resume --last` within Group B
-5. Each group builds on its own context, isolated from other groups
-
-**When to Resume vs New Session**:
-```
-RESUME (same group):
-  - Subtasks share files/modules
-  - Logical continuation of previous work
-  - Same architectural domain
-
-NEW SESSION (different group):
-  - Independent task area
-  - Different files/modules
-  - Switching architectural domains
-  - Testing after implementation
-```
-
-**Image Support**:
-```bash
-# First subtask with design reference
-codex -C [dir] -i design.png --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-
-# Resume for next subtask (image context preserved)
-codex exec "CONTINUE TO NEXT SUBTASK: ..." resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-**Subtask Failure**:
-1. Mark subtask as blocked in TodoWrite
-2. Report error details to user
-3. Pause execution for manual intervention
-4. Use AskUserQuestion for recovery decision:
-
-```typescript
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [{
-    question: "Codex execution failed for the subtask. How should the workflow proceed?",
-    header: "Recovery",
-    options: [
-      { label: "Retry Subtask", description: "Attempt to execute the same subtask again." },
-      { label: "Skip Subtask", description: "Continue to the next subtask in the plan." },
-      { label: "Abort Workflow", description: "Stop the entire execution." }
-    ],
-    multiSelect: false
-  }]
-})
-```
-
-**Git Verification Failure** (if --verify-git):
-1. Show unexpected changes
-2. Pause execution
-3. Request user decision:
-   - Continue anyway
-   - Rollback and retry
-   - Manual fix
-
-**Codex Session Lost**:
-1. Detect if `codex exec "..." resume --last` fails
-2. Attempt retry with fresh session
-3. Report to user if manual intervention needed
-
-## Output Format
-
-**During Execution**:
-```
-Task Flow Diagram:
-[Group A: Auth Core]
-  A1: Create user model ──┐
-  A2: Add validation     ─┤─► [resume] ─► A3: Database schema
-                          │
-[Group B: API Layer]      │
-  B1: Auth endpoints ─────┘─► [new session]
-  B2: Middleware ────────────► [resume] ─► B3: Error handling
-
-[Group C: Testing]
-  C1: Unit tests ─────────────► [new session]
-  C2: Integration tests ──────► [resume]
-
-Task Decomposition:
-  [Group A] 1. Create user model
-  [Group A] 2. Add validation logic [resume]
-  [Group A] 3. Implement database schema [resume]
-  [Group B] 4. Create auth endpoints [new session]
-  [Group B] 5. Add middleware [resume]
-  [Group B] 6. Error handling [resume]
-  [Group C] 7. Unit tests [new session]
-  [Group C] 8. Integration tests [resume]
-
-[Group A] Executing Subtask 1/8: Create user model
-  Starting new Codex session for Group A...
-  [Codex output]
-  Subtask 1 completed
-
-Git Verification:
-  M  src/models/user.ts
-  Changes verified
-
-[Group A] Executing Subtask 2/8: Add validation logic
-  Resuming Codex session (same group)...
-  [Codex output]
-  Subtask 2 completed
-
-[Group B] Executing Subtask 4/8: Create auth endpoints
-  Starting NEW Codex session for Group B...
-  [Codex output]
-  Subtask 4 completed
-...
-
-All Subtasks Completed
-Summary: [file references, changes, next steps]
-```
-
-**Final Summary**:
-```markdown
-# Task Execution Summary: [Task Description]
-
-## Subtasks Completed
-1. [Subtask 1]: [files modified]
-2. [Subtask 2]: [files modified]
-...
-
-## Files Modified
-- src/file1.ts:10-50 - [changes]
-- src/file2.ts - [changes]
-
-## Git Status
-- N files modified
-- M files added
-- No conflicts
-
-## Next Steps
-- [Suggested follow-up actions]
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-**Example 1: Simple Task with Groups**
-```bash
-/cli:codex-execute "implement user authentication system"
-
-# Task Flow Diagram:
-# [Group A: Data Layer]
-#   A1: Create user model ──► [resume] ──► A2: Database schema
-#
-# [Group B: Auth Logic]
-#   B1: JWT token generation ──► [new session]
-#   B2: Authentication middleware ──► [resume]
-#
-# [Group C: API Endpoints]
-#   C1: Login/logout endpoints ──► [new session]
-#
-# [Group D: Testing]
-#   D1: Unit tests ──► [new session]
-#   D2: Integration tests ──► [resume]
-
-# Execution:
-# Group A: A1 (new) → A2 (resume)
-# Group B: B1 (new) → B2 (resume)
-# Group C: C1 (new)
-# Group D: D1 (new) → D2 (resume)
-```
-
-**Example 2: With Git Verification**
-```bash
-/cli:codex-execute --verify-git "refactor API layer to use dependency injection"
-
-# After each subtask, verifies:
-# - Only expected files modified
-# - No breaking changes in unrelated code
-# - Tests still pass
-```
-
-**Example 3: With Task ID**
-```bash
-/cli:codex-execute IMPL-001
-
-# Loads task from .task/IMPL-001.json
-# Decomposes based on task requirements
-```
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Task Flow First**: Always create visual flow diagram before execution
-2. **Group Related Work**: Cluster subtasks by domain/files for efficient resume
-3. **Subtask Granularity**: Keep subtasks small and focused (5-15 min each)
-4. **Clear Boundaries**: Each subtask should have well-defined input/output
-5. **Git Hygiene**: Use `--verify-git` for critical refactoring
-6. **Pre-Execution Staging**: Stage changes before each subtask to clearly see codex modifications
-7. **Smart Resume**: Use `resume --last` ONLY within same group
-8. **Fresh Sessions**: Start new session when switching to different group/domain
-9. **Recovery Points**: TodoWrite with group labels provides clear progress tracking
-10. **Image References**: Attach design files for UI tasks (first subtask in group)
-
-## Input Processing
-
-**Automatic Detection**:
-- Input matches task ID pattern → Load from `.task/[ID].json`
-- Otherwise → Use as task description
-
-**Task JSON Structure** (when loading from file):
-```json
-{
-  "task_id": "IMPL-001",
-  "title": "Implement user authentication",
-  "description": "Create JWT-based auth system",
-  "acceptance_criteria": [...],
-  "scope": {...},
-  "brainstorming_refs": [...]
-}
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
-**Execution Log Destination**:
-- **IF** active workflow session exists:
-  - Execution log: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/codex-execute-[timestamp].md`
-  - Task summaries: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (if task ID)
-  - Task updates: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.task/[TASK-ID].json` status updates
-  - TodoWrite tracking: Embedded in execution log
-- **ELSE** (no active session):
-  - **Recommended**: Create workflow session first (`/workflow:session:start`)
-  - **Alternative**: Save to `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-[description]-[timestamp].md`
-
-**Output Files** (during execution):
-```
-.workflow/active/WFS-[session-id]/
-├── .chat/
-│   └── codex-execute-20250105-143022.md    # Full execution log with task flow
-├── .summaries/
-│   ├── IMPL-001.1-summary.md               # Subtask summaries
-│   ├── IMPL-001.2-summary.md
-│   └── IMPL-001-summary.md                 # Final task summary
-└── .task/
-    ├── IMPL-001.json                       # Updated task status
-    └── [subtask JSONs if decomposed]
-```
-
-**Examples**:
-- During session `WFS-auth-system`, executing multi-stage auth implementation:
-  - Log: `.workflow/active/WFS-auth-system/.chat/codex-execute-20250105-143022.md`
-  - Summaries: `.workflow/active/WFS-auth-system/.summaries/IMPL-001.{1,2,3}-summary.md`
-  - Task status: `.workflow/active/WFS-auth-system/.task/IMPL-001.json` (status: completed)
-- No session, ad-hoc multi-stage task:
-  - Log: `.workflow/.scratchpad/codex-execute-auth-refactor-20250105-143045.md`
-
-**Save Results**:
-- Execution log with task flow diagram and TodoWrite tracking
-- Individual summaries for each completed subtask
-- Final consolidated summary when all subtasks complete
-- Modified code files throughout project
-
-## Notes
-
-**vs. `/cli:execute`**:
-- `/cli:execute`: Single-shot execution with Gemini/Qwen/Codex
-- `/cli:codex-execute`: Multi-stage Codex execution with automatic task decomposition and resume mechanism
-
-**Input Flexibility**: Accepts both freeform descriptions and task IDs (auto-detects and loads JSON)
-
-**Context Window**: `codex exec "..." resume --last` maintains conversation history, ensuring consistency across subtasks without redundant context injection.
-
-**Output Details**:
-- Session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md
-- **⚠️ Code Modification**: This command performs multi-stage code modifications - execution log tracks all changes

.claude/commands/cli/discuss-plan.md

@@ -1,320 +0,0 @@
----
-name: discuss-plan
-description: Multi-round collaborative planning using Gemini, Codex, and Claude synthesis with iterative discussion cycles (read-only, no code changes)
-argument-hint: "[--topic '...'] [--task-id '...'] [--rounds N]"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
----
-
-# CLI Discuss-Plan Command (/cli:discuss-plan)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Orchestrates a multi-model collaborative discussion for in-depth planning and problem analysis. This command facilitates an iterative dialogue between Gemini, Codex, and Claude (the orchestrating AI) to explore a topic from multiple perspectives, refine ideas, and build a robust plan.
-
-**This command is for discussion and planning ONLY. It does NOT modify any code.**
-
-## Core Workflow: The Discussion Loop
-
-The command operates in iterative rounds, allowing the plan to evolve with each cycle. The user can choose to continue for more rounds or conclude when consensus is reached.
-
-```
-Topic Input → [Round 1: Gemini → Codex → Claude] → [User Review] →
-[Round 2: Gemini → Codex → Claude] → ... → Final Plan
-```
-
-### Model Roles & Priority
-
-**Priority Order**: Gemini > Codex > Claude
-
-1.  **Gemini (The Analyst)** - Priority 1
-    - Kicks off each round with deep analysis
-    - Provides foundational ideas and draft plans
-    - Analyzes current context or previous synthesis
-
-2.  **Codex (The Architect/Critic)** - Priority 2
-    - Reviews Gemini's output critically
-    - Uses deep reasoning for technical trade-offs
-    - Proposes alternative strategies
-    - **Participates purely in conversational/reasoning capacity**
-    - Uses resume mechanism to maintain discussion context
-
-3.  **Claude (The Synthesizer/Moderator)** - Priority 3
-    - Synthesizes discussion from Gemini and Codex
-    - Highlights agreements and contentions
-    - Structures refined plan
-    - Poses key questions for next round
-
-## Parameters
-
--   `<input>` (Required): Topic description or task ID (e.g., "Design a new caching layer" or `PLAN-002`)
--   `--rounds <N>` (Optional): Maximum number of discussion rounds (default: prompts after each round)
--   `--task-id <id>` (Optional): Associates discussion with workflow task ID
--   `--topic <description>` (Optional): High-level topic for discussion
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-### Phase 1: Initial Setup
-
-1.  **Input Processing**: Parse topic or task ID
-2.  **Context Gathering**: Identify relevant files based on topic
-
-### Phase 2: Discussion Round
-
-Each round consists of three sequential steps, tracked via `TodoWrite`.
-
-**Step 1: Gemini's Analysis (Priority 1)**
-
-Gemini analyzes the topic and proposes preliminary plan.
-
-```bash
-# Round 1: CONTEXT_INPUT is the initial topic
-# Subsequent rounds: CONTEXT_INPUT is the synthesis from previous round
-gemini -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze and propose a plan for '[topic]'
-TASK: Provide initial analysis, identify key modules, and draft implementation plan
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md [auto-detected files]
-INPUT: [CONTEXT_INPUT]
-EXPECTED: Structured analysis and draft plan for discussion
-RULES: Focus on technical depth and practical considerations
-"
-```
-
-**Step 2: Codex's Critique (Priority 2)**
-
-Codex reviews Gemini's output using conversational reasoning. Uses `resume --last` to maintain context across rounds.
-
-```bash
-# First round (new session)
-codex --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Critically review technical plan
-TASK: Review the provided plan, identify weaknesses, suggest alternatives, reason about trade-offs
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @CLAUDE.md [relevant files]
-INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis]
-EXPECTED: Critical review with alternative ideas and risk analysis
-RULES: Focus on architectural soundness and implementation feasibility
-" --skip-git-repo-check
-
-# Subsequent rounds (resume discussion)
-codex --full-auto exec "
-PURPOSE: Re-evaluate plan based on latest synthesis
-TASK: Review updated plan and discussion points, provide further critique or refined ideas
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: Previous discussion context (maintained via resume)
-INPUT_PLAN: [Output from Gemini's analysis for current round]
-EXPECTED: Updated critique building on previous discussion
-RULES: Build on previous insights, avoid repeating points
-" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check
-```
-
-**Step 3: Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)**
-
-Claude (orchestrating AI) synthesizes both outputs:
-
--   Summarizes Gemini's proposal and Codex's critique
--   Highlights agreements and disagreements
--   Structures consolidated plan
--   Presents open questions for next round
--   This synthesis becomes input for next round
-
-### Phase 3: User Review and Iteration
-
-1.  **Present Synthesis**: Show synthesized plan and key discussion points
-2.  **Continue or Conclude**: Use AskUserQuestion to prompt user:
-
-```typescript
-AskUserQuestion({
-  questions: [{
-    question: "Round of discussion complete. What is the next step?",
-    header: "Next Round",
-    options: [
-      { label: "Start another round", description: "Continue the discussion to refine the plan further." },
-      { label: "Conclude and finalize", description: "End the discussion and save the final plan." }
-    ],
-    multiSelect: false
-  }]
-})
-```
-
-3.  **Loop or Finalize**:
-    -   Continue → New round with Gemini analyzing latest synthesis
-    -   Conclude → Save final synthesized document
-
-## TodoWrite Tracking
-
-Progress tracked for each round and model.
-
-```javascript
-// Example for 2-round discussion
-TodoWrite({
-  todos: [
-    // Round 1
-    { content: "[Round 1] Gemini: Analyzing topic", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing with Gemini" },
-    { content: "[Round 1] Codex: Critiquing plan", status: "completed", activeForm: "Critiquing with Codex" },
-    { content: "[Round 1] Claude: Synthesizing discussion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Synthesizing discussion" },
-    { content: "[User Action] Review Round 1 and decide next step", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Awaiting user decision" },
-
-    // Round 2
-    { content: "[Round 2] Gemini: Analyzing refined plan", status: "pending", activeForm: "Analyzing refined plan" },
-    { content: "[Round 2] Codex: Re-evaluating plan [resume]", status: "pending", activeForm: "Re-evaluating with Codex" },
-    { content: "[Round 2] Claude: Finalizing plan", status: "pending", activeForm: "Finalizing plan" },
-    { content: "Discussion complete - Final plan generated", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating final document" }
-  ]
-})
-```
-
-## Output Routing
-
--   **Primary Log**: Entire multi-round discussion logged to single file:
-    -   `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/discuss-plan-[topic]-[timestamp].md`
--   **Final Plan**: Clean final version saved upon conclusion:
-    -   `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/plan-[topic].md`
--   **Scratchpad**: If no session active:
-    -   `.workflow/.scratchpad/discuss-plan-[topic]-[timestamp].md`
-
-## Discussion Structure
-
-Each round's output is structured as:
-
-```markdown
-## Round N: [Topic]
-
-### Gemini's Analysis (Priority 1)
-[Gemini's full analysis and proposal]
-
-### Codex's Critique (Priority 2)
-[Codex's critical review and alternatives]
-
-### Claude's Synthesis (Priority 3)
-**Points of Agreement:**
-- [Agreement 1]
-- [Agreement 2]
-
-**Points of Contention:**
-- [Issue 1]: Gemini suggests X, Codex suggests Y
-- [Issue 2]: Trade-off between A and B
-
-**Consolidated Plan:**
-[Structured plan incorporating both perspectives]
-
-**Open Questions for Next Round:**
-1. [Question 1]
-2. [Question 2]
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-### Example 1: Multi-Round Architecture Discussion
-
-**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Design a real-time notification system"`
-
-**Round 1**:
-1.  **Gemini**: Proposes WebSocket-based architecture with RabbitMQ message queue
-2.  **Codex**: Critiques as overly complex for MVP. Suggests Server-Sent Events (SSE) for simplicity (one-way notifications). Questions RabbitMQ necessity, proposes simpler Redis Pub/Sub
-3.  **Claude**: Synthesizes views:
-    -   **Plan A (Gemini)**: WebSockets + RabbitMQ (highly scalable, complex)
-    -   **Plan B (Codex)**: SSE + Redis (simpler, less overhead)
-    -   **Open Question**: Is bi-directional communication critical, or is simplicity priority?
-4.  **User Action**: Opts for another round to explore trade-offs
-
-**Round 2**:
-1.  **Gemini**: Analyzes synthesized document. Notes that if features like "user is typing" indicators are roadmapped, WebSockets better long-term. Drafts plan starting with SSE/Redis but designing for easy migration
-2.  **Codex**: Reviews migration plan. Reasons that migration itself could be complex. If feature set likely to expand, starting with WebSockets using managed service might be best cost/benefit
-3.  **Claude**: Synthesizes new discussion:
-    -   **Consensus**: Simple SSE/Redis too short-sighted
-    -   **Refined Options**:
-        1.  Phased approach (SSE → WebSocket) with clear migration plan
-        2.  Direct WebSocket with managed service (Pusher, Ably) to reduce ops overhead
-    -   **Recommendation**: Option 2 most robust and future-proof
-4.  **User Action**: Agrees with recommendation, concludes discussion
-
-**Final Output**: Planning document saved with:
-- Chosen architecture (Managed WebSocket service)
-- Multi-round reasoning
-- High-level implementation steps
-
-### Example 2: Feature Design Discussion
-
-**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Design user permission system" --rounds 2`
-
-**Round 1**:
-1.  **Gemini**: Proposes RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) with predefined roles
-2.  **Codex**: Suggests ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) for more flexibility
-3.  **Claude**: Synthesizes trade-offs between simplicity (RBAC) vs flexibility (ABAC)
-
-**Round 2**:
-1.  **Gemini**: Analyzes hybrid approach - RBAC for core permissions, attributes for fine-grained control
-2.  **Codex**: Reviews hybrid model, identifies implementation challenges
-3.  **Claude**: Final plan with phased rollout strategy
-
-**Automatic Conclusion**: Command concludes after 2 rounds as specified
-
-### Example 3: Problem-Solving Discussion
-
-**Command**: `/cli:discuss-plan --topic "Debug memory leak in data pipeline" --task-id ISSUE-042`
-
-**Round 1**:
-1.  **Gemini**: Identifies potential leak sources (unclosed handles, growing cache, event listeners)
-2.  **Codex**: Adds profiling tool recommendations, suggests memory monitoring
-3.  **Claude**: Structures debugging plan with phased approach
-
-**User Decision**: Single round sufficient, concludes with debugging strategy
-
-## Consensus Mechanisms
-
-**When to Continue:**
-- Significant disagreement between models
-- Open questions requiring deeper analysis
-- Trade-offs need more exploration
-- User wants additional perspectives
-
-**When to Conclude:**
-- Models converge on solution
-- All key questions addressed
-- User satisfied with plan depth
-- Maximum rounds reached (if specified)
-
-## Comparison with Other Commands
-
-| Command | Models | Rounds | Discussion | Implementation | Use Case |
-|---------|--------|--------|------------|----------------|----------|
-| `/cli:mode:plan` | Gemini | 1 | NO | NO | Single-model planning |
-| `/cli:analyze` | Gemini/Qwen | 1 | NO | NO | Code analysis |
-| `/cli:execute` | Any | 1 | NO | YES | Direct implementation |
-| `/cli:codex-execute` | Codex | 1 | NO | YES | Multi-stage implementation |
-| `/cli:discuss-plan` | **Gemini+Codex+Claude** | **Multiple** | **YES** | **NO** | **Multi-perspective planning** |
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1.  **Use for Complex Decisions**: Ideal for architectural decisions, design trade-offs, problem-solving
-2.  **Start with Broad Topic**: Let first round establish scope, subsequent rounds refine
-3.  **Review Each Synthesis**: Claude's synthesis is key decision point - review carefully
-4.  **Know When to Stop**: Don't over-iterate - 2-3 rounds usually sufficient
-5.  **Task Association**: Use `--task-id` for traceability in workflow
-6.  **Save Intermediate Results**: Each round's synthesis saved automatically
-7.  **Let Models Disagree**: Divergent views often reveal important trade-offs
-8.  **Focus Questions**: Use Claude's open questions to guide next round
-
-## Breaking Discussion Loops
-
-**Detecting Loops:**
-- Models repeating same arguments
-- No new insights emerging
-- Trade-offs well understood
-
-**Breaking Strategies:**
-1.  **User Decision**: Make executive decision when enough info gathered
-2.  **Timeboxing**: Set max rounds upfront with `--rounds`
-3.  **Criteria-Based**: Define decision criteria before starting
-4.  **Hybrid Approach**: Accept multiple valid solutions in final plan
-
-## Notes
-
--   **Pure Discussion**: This command NEVER modifies code - only produces planning documents
--   **Codex Role**: Codex participates as reasoning/critique tool, not executor
--   **Resume Context**: Codex maintains discussion context via `resume --last`
--   **Priority System**: Ensures Gemini leads analysis, Codex provides critique, Claude synthesizes
--   **Output Quality**: Multi-perspective discussion produces more robust plans than single-model analysis
--   Command patterns and session management: see intelligent-tools-strategy.md (loaded in memory)
--   For implementation after discussion, use `/cli:execute` or `/cli:codex-execute` separately

.claude/commands/cli/execute.md

@@ -1,202 +0,0 @@
----
-name: execute
-description: Autonomous code implementation with YOLO auto-approval using Gemini/Qwen/Codex, supports task ID or description input with automatic file pattern detection
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] description or task-id"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# CLI Execute Command (/cli:execute)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Execute implementation tasks with **YOLO permissions** (auto-approves all confirmations). **MODIFIES CODE**.
-
-**Intent**: Autonomous code implementation, modification, and generation
-**Supported Tools**: codex, gemini (default), qwen
-**Key Feature**: Automatic context inference and file pattern detection
-
-## Core Behavior
-
-1. **Code Modification**: This command MODIFIES, CREATES, and DELETES code files
-2. **Auto-Approval**: YOLO mode bypasses confirmation prompts for all operations
-3. **Implementation Focus**: Executes actual code changes, not just recommendations
-4. **Requires Explicit Intent**: Use only when implementation is intended
-
-## Core Concepts
-
-### YOLO Permissions
-Auto-approves: file pattern inference, execution, **file modifications**, summary generation
-
-**WARNING**: This command will make actual code changes without manual confirmation
-
-### Execution Modes
-
-**1. Description Mode** (supports `--enhance`):
-- Input: Natural language description
-- Process: [Optional: Enhance] → Keyword analysis → Pattern inference → Execute
-
-**2. Task ID Mode** (no `--enhance`):
-- Input: Workflow task identifier (e.g., `IMPL-001`)
-- Process: Task JSON parsing → Scope analysis → Execute
-
-**3. Agent Mode** (default):
-- Input: Description or task-id
-- Process: 5-Phase Workflow → Context Discovery → Optimal Tool Selection → Execute
-
-### Context Inference
-
-Auto-selects files based on keywords and technology (each @ references one pattern):
-- "auth" → `@**/*auth* @**/*user*`
-- "React" → `@src/**/*.jsx @src/**/*.tsx`
-- "api" → `@**/api/**/* @**/routes/**/*`
-- Always includes: `@CLAUDE.md @**/*CLAUDE.md`
-
-For precise file targeting, use `rg` or MCP tools to discover files first.
-
-### Codex Session Continuity
-
-**Resume Pattern** for related tasks:
-```bash
-# First task - establish session
-codex -C [dir] --full-auto exec "[task]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-
-# Related task - continue session
-codex --full-auto exec "[related-task]" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
-```
-
-Use `resume --last` when current task extends/relates to previous execution. See intelligent-tools-strategy.md for auto-resume rules.
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <codex|gemini|qwen>` - Select CLI tool (default: auto-select by agent based on complexity)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance input with `/enhance-prompt` first (Description Mode only)
-- `<description|task-id>` - Natural language description or task identifier
-- `--debug` - Verbose logging
-- `--save-session` - Save execution to workflow session
-
-## Workflow Integration
-
-**Session Management**: Auto-detects active session from `.workflow/active/` directory
-- Active session: Save to `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md`
-- No session: Create new session or save to scratchpad
-
-**Task Integration**: Load from `.task/[TASK-ID].json`, update status, generate summary
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated implementation:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Autonomous code implementation with YOLO auto-approval",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${description_or_task_id}
-    Mode: execute
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-    Task-ID: ${task_id}
-
-    Execute autonomous code implementation with full modification permissions:
-
-    1. Task Analysis:
-       ${task_id ? '- Load task spec from .task/' + task_id + '.json' : ''}
-       - Parse requirements and implementation scope
-       - Classify complexity (simple/medium/complex)
-       - Extract keywords for context discovery
-
-    2. Context Discovery:
-       - Discover implementation files using MCP/ripgrep
-       - Identify existing patterns and conventions (CLAUDE.md)
-       - Map dependencies and integration points
-       - Gather related tests and documentation
-       - Auto-detect file patterns from keywords
-
-    3. Tool Selection & Execution:
-       - Complexity assessment:
-         * Simple/Medium → Gemini/Qwen (MODE=write, --approval-mode yolo)
-         * Complex → Codex (MODE=auto, --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access)
-       - Tool preference: ${tool_flag || 'auto-select based on complexity'}
-       - Apply appropriate implementation template
-       - Execute with YOLO auto-approval (bypasses all confirmations)
-
-    4. Implementation:
-       - Modify/create/delete code files per requirements
-       - Follow existing code patterns and conventions
-       - Include comprehensive context in CLI command
-       - Ensure working implementation with proper error handling
-
-    5. Output & Documentation:
-       - Save execution log: .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md
-       ${task_id ? '- Generate task summary: .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/' + task_id + '-summary.md' : ''}
-       ${task_id ? '- Update task status in .task/' + task_id + '.json' : ''}
-       - Document all code changes made
-
-    ⚠️ YOLO Mode: All file operations auto-approved without confirmation
-  `
-)
-```
-
-**Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md` + `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.summaries/[TASK-ID]-summary.md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
-
-## Examples
-
-**Basic Implementation** (modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute "implement JWT authentication with middleware"
-# Agent Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=medium, keywords=['jwt', 'auth', 'middleware']
-# Agent Phase 2: Discovers auth patterns, existing middleware structure
-# Agent Phase 3: Selects Gemini (medium complexity)
-# Agent Phase 4: Executes with auto-approval
-# Result: NEW/MODIFIED code files with JWT implementation
-```
-
-**Complex Implementation** (modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute "implement OAuth2 authentication with token refresh"
-# Agent Phase 1: Classifies intent=execute, complexity=complex, keywords=['oauth2', 'auth', 'token', 'refresh']
-# Agent Phase 2: MCP discovers auth patterns, existing middleware, JWT dependencies
-# Agent Phase 3: Enhances prompt with discovered patterns and best practices
-# Agent Phase 4: Selects Codex (complex task), executes with comprehensive context
-# Agent Phase 5: Saves execution log + generates implementation summary
-# Result: Complete OAuth2 implementation + detailed execution log
-```
-
-**Enhanced Implementation** (modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute --enhance "implement JWT authentication"
-# Step 1: Enhance to expand requirements
-# Step 2: Execute implementation with auto-approval
-# Result: Complete auth system with MODIFIED code files
-```
-
-**Task Execution** (modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute IMPL-001
-# Reads: .task/IMPL-001.json for requirements
-# Executes: Implementation based on task spec
-# Result: Code changes per task definition
-```
-
-**Codex Implementation** (modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute --tool codex "optimize database queries"
-# Executes: Codex with full file access
-# Result: MODIFIED query code, new indexes, updated tests
-```
-
-**Qwen Code Generation** (modifies code):
-```bash
-/cli:execute --tool qwen --enhance "refactor auth module"
-# Step 1: Enhanced refactoring plan
-# Step 2: Execute with MODE=write
-# Result: REFACTORED auth code with structural changes
-```
-
-## Comparison with Analysis Commands
-
-| Command | Intent | Code Changes | Auto-Approve |
-|---------|--------|--------------|--------------|
-| `/cli:analyze` | Understand code | NO | N/A |
-| `/cli:chat` | Ask questions | NO | N/A |
-| `/cli:execute` | **Implement** | **YES** | **YES** |

.claude/commands/cli/mode/bug-diagnosis.md

@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
----
-name: bug-diagnosis
-description: Read-only bug root cause analysis using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with systematic diagnosis template for fix suggestions
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] bug description"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Bug Diagnosis (/cli:mode:bug-diagnosis)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Systematic bug diagnosis with root cause analysis template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`).
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **gemini** (default) - Best for bug diagnosis
-- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
-- **codex** - Alternative for complex bug analysis
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance bug description with `/enhance-prompt`
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused diagnosis
-- `<bug-description>` (Required) - Bug description or error details
-
-## Tool Usage
-
-**Gemini** (Primary):
-```bash
-# Uses gemini by default, or specify explicitly
---tool gemini
-```
-
-**Qwen** (Fallback):
-```bash
---tool qwen
-```
-
-**Codex** (Alternative):
-```bash
---tool codex
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated bug diagnosis:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Bug root cause diagnosis with fix suggestions",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${bug_description}
-    Mode: bug-diagnosis
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
-    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
-
-    Execute systematic bug diagnosis and root cause analysis:
-
-    1. Context Discovery:
-       - Locate error traces, stack traces, and log messages
-       - Find related code sections and affected modules
-       - Identify data flow paths leading to the bug
-       - Discover test cases related to bug area
-       - Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive context gathering
-
-    2. Root Cause Analysis:
-       - Apply diagnostic template methodology
-       - Trace execution to identify failure point
-       - Analyze state, data, and logic causing issue
-       - Document potential root causes with evidence
-       - Assess bug severity and impact scope
-
-    3. CLI Command Construction:
-       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex bugs)
-       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
-       - Context: @**/* + error traces + affected code
-       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
-       - Template: analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
-
-    4. Output Generation:
-       - Root cause diagnosis with evidence
-       - Fix suggestions and recommendations
-       - Prevention strategies
-       - Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-diagnosis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
-  `
-)
-```
-
-## Core Rules
-
-- **Read-only**: Diagnoses bugs, does NOT modify code
-- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt`
-- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/bug-diagnosis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/mode/code-analysis.md

@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
----
-name: code-analysis
-description: Read-only execution path tracing using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with specialized analysis template for call flow and optimization
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] analysis target"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Code Analysis (/cli:mode:code-analysis)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Systematic code analysis with execution path tracing template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt`).
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **gemini** (default) - Best for code analysis and tracing
-- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
-- **codex** - Alternative for complex analysis tasks
-
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped analysis
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt` first
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused analysis
-- `<analysis-target>` (Required) - Code analysis target or question
-
-## Tool Usage
-
-**Gemini** (Primary):
-```bash
-/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool gemini "trace auth flow"
-# OR (default)
-/cli:mode:code-analysis "trace auth flow"
-```
-
-**Qwen** (Fallback):
-```bash
-/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool qwen "trace auth flow"
-```
-
-**Codex** (Alternative):
-```bash
-/cli:mode:code-analysis --tool codex "trace auth flow"
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated code analysis:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Execution path tracing and call flow analysis",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${analysis_target}
-    Mode: code-analysis
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
-    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt
-
-    Execute systematic code analysis with execution path tracing:
-
-    1. Context Discovery:
-       - Identify entry points and function signatures
-       - Trace call chains and execution flows
-       - Discover related files (implementations, dependencies, tests)
-       - Map data flow and state transformations
-       - Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive file discovery
-
-    2. Analysis Execution:
-       - Apply execution tracing template
-       - Generate call flow diagrams (textual)
-       - Document execution paths and branching logic
-       - Identify optimization opportunities
-
-    3. CLI Command Construction:
-       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex analysis)
-       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
-       - Context: @**/* + discovered execution context
-       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
-       - Template: analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt
-
-    4. Output Generation:
-       - Execution trace documentation
-       - Call flow analysis with diagrams
-       - Performance and optimization insights
-       - Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
-  `
-)
-```
-
-## Core Rules
-
-- **Read-only**: Analyzes code, does NOT modify files
-- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-trace-code-execution.txt`
-- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/code-analysis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/cli/mode/document-analysis.md

@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
----
-name: document-analysis
-description: Read-only technical document/paper analysis using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with systematic comprehension template for insights extraction
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] document path or topic"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*), Read(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Document Analysis (/cli:mode:document-analysis)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Systematic analysis of technical documents, research papers, API documentation, and technical specifications.
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **gemini** (default) - Best for document comprehension and structure analysis
-- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
-- **codex** - Alternative for complex technical documents
-
-**Key Feature**: `--cd` flag for directory-scoped document discovery
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance analysis target with `/enhance-prompt`
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for document search
-- `<document-path-or-topic>` (Required) - File path or topic description
-
-## Tool Usage
-
-**Gemini** (Primary):
-```bash
-/cli:mode:document-analysis "README.md"
-/cli:mode:document-analysis --tool gemini "analyze API documentation"
-```
-
-**Qwen** (Fallback):
-```bash
-/cli:mode:document-analysis --tool qwen "docs/architecture.md"
-```
-
-**Codex** (Alternative):
-```bash
-/cli:mode:document-analysis --tool codex "research paper in docs/"
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** for automated document analysis:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Systematic document comprehension and insights extraction",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${document_path_or_topic}
-    Mode: document-analysis
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
-    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-technical-document.txt
-
-    Execute systematic document analysis:
-
-    1. Document Discovery:
-       - Locate target document(s) via path or topic keywords
-       - Identify document type (README, API docs, research paper, spec, tutorial)
-       - Detect document format (Markdown, PDF, plain text, reStructuredText)
-       - Discover related documents (references, appendices, examples)
-       - Use MCP/ripgrep for comprehensive file discovery
-
-    2. Pre-Analysis Planning (Required):
-       - Determine document structure (sections, hierarchy, flow)
-       - Identify key components (abstract, methodology, implementation details)
-       - Map dependencies and cross-references
-       - Assess document scope and complexity
-       - Plan analysis approach based on document type
-
-    3. CLI Command Construction:
-       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for complex docs)
-       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
-       - Context: @{document_paths} + @CLAUDE.md + related files
-       - Mode: analysis (read-only)
-       - Template: analysis/02-analyze-technical-document.txt
-
-    4. Analysis Execution:
-       - Apply 6-field template structure (PURPOSE, TASK, MODE, CONTEXT, EXPECTED, RULES)
-       - Execute multi-phase analysis protocol with pre-planning
-       - Perform self-critique before final output
-       - Generate structured report with evidence-based insights
-
-    5. Output Generation:
-       - Comprehensive document analysis report
-       - Structured insights with section references
-       - Critical assessment with evidence
-       - Actionable recommendations
-       - Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/doc-analysis-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
-  `
-)
-```
-
-## Core Rules
-
-- **Read-only**: Analyzes documents, does NOT modify files
-- **Evidence-based**: All claims must reference specific sections/pages
-- **Pre-planning**: Requires analysis approach planning before execution
-- **Precise language**: Direct, accurate wording - no persuasive embellishment
-- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/doc-analysis-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)
-
-## Document Types Supported
-
-| Type | Focus Areas | Key Outputs |
-|------|-------------|-------------|
-| README | Purpose, setup, usage | Integration steps, quick-start guide |
-| API Documentation | Endpoints, parameters, responses | API usage patterns, integration points |
-| Research Paper | Methodology, findings, validity | Applicable techniques, implementation feasibility |
-| Specification | Requirements, standards, constraints | Compliance checklist, implementation requirements |
-| Tutorial | Learning path, examples, exercises | Key concepts, practical applications |
-| Architecture Docs | System design, components, patterns | Design decisions, integration points, trade-offs |
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Scope Definition**: Clearly define what aspects to analyze before starting
-2. **Layered Reading**: Structure/Overview → Details → Critical Analysis → Synthesis
-3. **Evidence Trail**: Track section references for all extracted information
-4. **Gap Identification**: Note missing information or unclear sections explicitly
-5. **Actionable Output**: Focus on insights that inform decisions or actions

.claude/commands/cli/mode/plan.md

@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
----
-name: plan
-description: Read-only architecture planning using Gemini/Qwen/Codex with strategic planning template for modification plans and impact analysis
-argument-hint: "[--tool codex|gemini|qwen] [--enhance] [--cd path] topic"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# CLI Mode: Plan (/cli:mode:plan)
-
-## Purpose
-
-Strategic software architecture planning template (`~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt`).
-
-**Tool Selection**:
-- **gemini** (default) - Best for architecture planning
-- **qwen** - Fallback when Gemini unavailable
-- **codex** - Alternative for implementation planning
-
-## Parameters
-
-- `--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>` - Tool selection (default: gemini)
-- `--enhance` - Enhance task with `/enhance-prompt`
-- `--cd "path"` - Target directory for focused planning
-- `<planning-task>` (Required) - Architecture planning task or modification requirements
-
-## Tool Usage
-
-**Gemini** (Primary):
-```bash
---tool gemini  # or omit (default)
-```
-
-**Qwen** (Fallback):
-```bash
---tool qwen
-```
-
-**Codex** (Alternative):
-```bash
---tool codex
-```
-
-## Execution Flow
-
-Uses **cli-execution-agent** (default) for automated planning:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
-  description="Architecture planning with impact analysis",
-  prompt=`
-    Task: ${planning_task}
-    Mode: plan
-    Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'}
-    Directory: ${cd_path || '.'}
-    Enhance: ${enhance_flag}
-    Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt
-
-    Execute strategic architecture planning:
-
-    1. Context Discovery:
-       - Analyze current architecture structure
-       - Identify affected components and modules
-       - Map dependencies and integration points
-       - Assess modification impacts (scope, complexity, risks)
-
-    2. Planning Analysis:
-       - Apply strategic planning template
-       - Generate modification plan with phases
-       - Document architectural decisions and rationale
-       - Identify potential conflicts and mitigation strategies
-
-    3. CLI Command Construction:
-       - Tool: ${tool_flag || 'gemini'} (qwen fallback, codex for implementation guidance)
-       - Directory: cd ${cd_path || '.'} &&
-       - Context: @**/* (full architecture context)
-       - Mode: analysis (read-only, no code generation)
-       - Template: planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt
-
-    4. Output Generation:
-       - Strategic modification plan
-       - Impact analysis and risk assessment
-       - Implementation roadmap
-       - Save to .workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md (or .scratchpad/)
-  `
-)
-```
-
-## Core Rules
-
-- **Read-only**: Creates modification plans, does NOT generate code
-- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/planning/01-plan-architecture-design.txt`
-- **Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.chat/plan-[timestamp].md` (or `.scratchpad/` if no session)

.claude/commands/issue/discover-by-prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,764 @@
+---
+name: issue:discover-by-prompt
+description: Discover issues from user prompt with Gemini-planned iterative multi-agent exploration. Uses ACE semantic search for context gathering and supports cross-module comparison (e.g., frontend vs backend API contracts).
+argument-hint: "<prompt> [--scope=src/**] [--depth=standard|deep] [--max-iterations=5]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Glob(*), Grep(*), mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*), mcp__exa__search(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Discovery by Prompt
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Discover issues based on user description
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Check if frontend API calls match backend implementations"
+
+# Compare specific modules
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Verify auth flow consistency between mobile and web clients" --scope=src/auth/**,src/mobile/**
+
+# Deep exploration with more iterations
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Find all places where error handling is inconsistent" --depth=deep --max-iterations=8
+
+# Focused backend-frontend contract check
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Compare REST API definitions with frontend fetch calls"
+```
+
+**Core Difference from `/issue:discover`**:
+- `discover`: Pre-defined perspectives (bug, security, etc.), parallel execution
+- `discover-by-prompt`: User-driven prompt, Gemini-planned strategy, iterative exploration
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+
+Prompt-driven issue discovery with intelligent planning. Instead of fixed perspectives, this command:
+
+1. **Analyzes user intent** via Gemini to understand what to find
+2. **Plans exploration strategy** dynamically based on codebase structure
+3. **Executes iterative multi-agent exploration** with feedback loops
+4. **Performs cross-module comparison** when detecting comparison intent
+
+### Value Proposition
+
+1. **Natural Language Input**: Describe what you want to find, not how to find it
+2. **Intelligent Planning**: Gemini designs optimal exploration strategy
+3. **Iterative Refinement**: Each round builds on previous discoveries
+4. **Cross-Module Analysis**: Compare frontend/backend, mobile/web, old/new implementations
+5. **Adaptive Exploration**: Adjusts direction based on findings
+
+### Use Cases
+
+| Scenario | Example Prompt |
+|----------|----------------|
+| API Contract | "Check if frontend calls match backend endpoints" |
+| Error Handling | "Find inconsistent error handling patterns" |
+| Migration Gap | "Compare old auth with new auth implementation" |
+| Feature Parity | "Verify mobile has all web features" |
+| Schema Drift | "Check if TypeScript types match API responses" |
+| Integration | "Find mismatches between service A and service B" |
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Prompt Analysis & Initialization
+   ├─ Parse user prompt and flags
+   ├─ Detect exploration intent (comparison/search/verification)
+   └─ Initialize discovery session
+
+Phase 1.5: ACE Context Gathering
+   ├─ Use ACE semantic search to understand codebase structure
+   ├─ Identify relevant modules based on prompt keywords
+   ├─ Collect architecture context for Gemini planning
+   └─ Build initial context package
+
+Phase 2: Gemini Strategy Planning
+   ├─ Feed ACE context + prompt to Gemini CLI
+   ├─ Gemini analyzes and generates exploration strategy
+   ├─ Create exploration dimensions with search targets
+   ├─ Define comparison matrix (if comparison intent)
+   └─ Set success criteria and iteration limits
+
+Phase 3: Iterative Agent Exploration (with ACE)
+   ├─ Iteration 1: Initial exploration by assigned agents
+   │   ├─ Agent A: ACE search + explore dimension 1
+   │   ├─ Agent B: ACE search + explore dimension 2
+   │   └─ Collect findings, update shared context
+   ├─ Iteration 2-N: Refined exploration
+   │   ├─ Analyze previous findings
+   │   ├─ ACE search for related code paths
+   │   ├─ Execute targeted exploration
+   │   └─ Update cumulative findings
+   └─ Termination: Max iterations or convergence
+
+Phase 4: Cross-Analysis & Synthesis
+   ├─ Compare findings across dimensions
+   ├─ Identify discrepancies and issues
+   ├─ Calculate confidence scores
+   └─ Generate issue candidates
+
+Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary
+   ├─ Convert findings to issue format
+   ├─ Write discovery outputs
+   └─ Prompt user for next action
+```
+
+### Exploration Dimensions
+
+Dimensions are **dynamically generated by Gemini** based on the user prompt. Not limited to predefined categories.
+
+**Examples**:
+
+| Prompt | Generated Dimensions |
+|--------|---------------------|
+| "Check API contracts" | frontend-calls, backend-handlers |
+| "Find auth issues" | auth-module (single dimension) |
+| "Compare old/new implementations" | legacy-code, new-code |
+| "Audit payment flow" | payment-service, validation, logging |
+| "Find error handling gaps" | error-handlers, error-types, recovery-logic |
+
+Gemini analyzes the prompt + ACE context to determine:
+- How many dimensions are needed (1 to N)
+- What each dimension should focus on
+- Whether comparison is needed between dimensions
+
+### Iteration Strategy
+
+```
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│                    Iteration Loop                           │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│  1. Plan: What to explore this iteration                    │
+│     └─ Based on: previous findings + unexplored areas       │
+│                                                             │
+│  2. Execute: Launch agents for this iteration               │
+│     └─ Each agent: explore → collect → return summary       │
+│                                                             │
+│  3. Analyze: Process iteration results                      │
+│     └─ New findings? Gaps? Contradictions?                  │
+│                                                             │
+│  4. Decide: Continue or terminate                           │
+│     └─ Terminate if: max iterations OR convergence OR       │
+│                      high confidence on all questions       │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+```
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Phase 1: Prompt Analysis & Initialization
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Parse arguments
+const { prompt, scope, depth, maxIterations } = parseArgs(args);
+
+// Step 2: Generate discovery ID
+const discoveryId = `DBP-${formatDate(new Date(), 'YYYYMMDD-HHmmss')}`;
+
+// Step 3: Create output directory
+const outputDir = `.workflow/issues/discoveries/${discoveryId}`;
+await mkdir(outputDir, { recursive: true });
+await mkdir(`${outputDir}/iterations`, { recursive: true });
+
+// Step 4: Detect intent type from prompt
+const intentType = detectIntent(prompt);
+// Returns: 'comparison' | 'search' | 'verification' | 'audit'
+
+// Step 5: Initialize discovery state
+await writeJson(`${outputDir}/discovery-state.json`, {
+  discovery_id: discoveryId,
+  type: 'prompt-driven',
+  prompt: prompt,
+  intent_type: intentType,
+  scope: scope || '**/*',
+  depth: depth || 'standard',
+  max_iterations: maxIterations || 5,
+  phase: 'initialization',
+  created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  iterations: [],
+  cumulative_findings: [],
+  comparison_matrix: null  // filled for comparison intent
+});
+```
+
+### Phase 1.5: ACE Context Gathering
+
+**Purpose**: Use ACE semantic search to gather codebase context before Gemini planning.
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Extract keywords from prompt for semantic search
+const keywords = extractKeywords(prompt);
+// e.g., "frontend API calls match backend" → ["frontend", "API", "backend", "endpoints"]
+
+// Step 2: Use ACE to understand codebase structure
+const aceQueries = [
+  `Project architecture and module structure for ${keywords.join(', ')}`,
+  `Where are ${keywords[0]} implementations located?`,
+  `How does ${keywords.slice(0, 2).join(' ')} work in this codebase?`
+];
+
+const aceResults = [];
+for (const query of aceQueries) {
+  const result = await mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+    project_root_path: process.cwd(),
+    query: query
+  });
+  aceResults.push({ query, result });
+}
+
+// Step 3: Build context package for Gemini (kept in memory)
+const aceContext = {
+  prompt_keywords: keywords,
+  codebase_structure: aceResults[0].result,
+  relevant_modules: aceResults.slice(1).map(r => r.result),
+  detected_patterns: extractPatterns(aceResults)
+};
+
+// Step 4: Update state (no separate file)
+await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+  phase: 'context-gathered',
+  ace_context: {
+    queries_executed: aceQueries.length,
+    modules_identified: aceContext.relevant_modules.length
+  }
+});
+
+// aceContext passed to Phase 2 in memory
+```
+
+**ACE Query Strategy by Intent Type**:
+
+| Intent | ACE Queries |
+|--------|-------------|
+| **comparison** | "frontend API calls", "backend API handlers", "API contract definitions" |
+| **search** | "{keyword} implementations", "{keyword} usage patterns" |
+| **verification** | "expected behavior for {feature}", "test coverage for {feature}" |
+| **audit** | "all {category} patterns", "{category} security concerns" |
+
+### Phase 2: Gemini Strategy Planning
+
+**Purpose**: Gemini analyzes user prompt + ACE context to design optimal exploration strategy.
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Load ACE context gathered in Phase 1.5
+const aceContext = await readJson(`${outputDir}/ace-context.json`);
+
+// Step 2: Build Gemini planning prompt with ACE context
+const planningPrompt = `
+PURPOSE: Analyze discovery prompt and create exploration strategy based on codebase context
+TASK:
+• Parse user intent from prompt: "${prompt}"
+• Use codebase context to identify specific modules and files to explore
+• Create exploration dimensions with precise search targets
+• Define comparison matrix structure (if comparison intent)
+• Set success criteria and iteration strategy
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @${scope || '**/*'} | Discovery type: ${intentType}
+
+## Codebase Context (from ACE semantic search)
+${JSON.stringify(aceContext, null, 2)}
+
+EXPECTED: JSON exploration plan following exploration-plan-schema.json:
+{
+  "intent_analysis": { "type": "${intentType}", "primary_question": "...", "sub_questions": [...] },
+  "dimensions": [{ "name": "...", "description": "...", "search_targets": [...], "focus_areas": [...], "agent_prompt": "..." }],
+  "comparison_matrix": { "dimension_a": "...", "dimension_b": "...", "comparison_points": [...] },
+  "success_criteria": [...],
+  "estimated_iterations": N,
+  "termination_conditions": [...]
+}
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Use ACE context to inform targets | Focus on actionable plan
+`;
+
+// Step 3: Execute Gemini planning
+Bash({
+  command: `ccw cli -p "${planningPrompt}" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
+  run_in_background: true,
+  timeout: 300000
+});
+
+// Step 4: Parse Gemini output and validate against schema
+const explorationPlan = await parseGeminiPlanOutput(geminiResult);
+validateAgainstSchema(explorationPlan, 'exploration-plan-schema.json');
+
+// Step 5: Enhance plan with ACE-discovered file paths
+explorationPlan.dimensions = explorationPlan.dimensions.map(dim => ({
+  ...dim,
+  ace_suggested_files: aceContext.relevant_modules
+    .filter(m => m.relevance_to === dim.name)
+    .map(m => m.file_path)
+}));
+
+// Step 6: Update state (plan kept in memory, not persisted)
+await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+  phase: 'planned',
+  exploration_plan: {
+    dimensions_count: explorationPlan.dimensions.length,
+    has_comparison_matrix: !!explorationPlan.comparison_matrix,
+    estimated_iterations: explorationPlan.estimated_iterations
+  }
+});
+
+// explorationPlan passed to Phase 3 in memory
+```
+
+**Gemini Planning Responsibilities**:
+
+| Responsibility | Input | Output |
+|----------------|-------|--------|
+| Intent Analysis | User prompt | type, primary_question, sub_questions |
+| Dimension Design | ACE context + prompt | dimensions with search_targets |
+| Comparison Matrix | Intent type + modules | comparison_points (if applicable) |
+| Iteration Strategy | Depth setting | estimated_iterations, termination_conditions |
+
+**Gemini Planning Output Schema**:
+
+```json
+{
+  "intent_analysis": {
+    "type": "comparison|search|verification|audit",
+    "primary_question": "string",
+    "sub_questions": ["string"]
+  },
+  "dimensions": [
+    {
+      "name": "frontend",
+      "description": "Client-side API calls and error handling",
+      "search_targets": ["src/api/**", "src/hooks/**"],
+      "focus_areas": ["fetch calls", "error boundaries", "response parsing"],
+      "agent_prompt": "Explore frontend API consumption patterns..."
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "backend",
+      "description": "Server-side API implementations",
+      "search_targets": ["src/server/**", "src/routes/**"],
+      "focus_areas": ["endpoint handlers", "response schemas", "error responses"],
+      "agent_prompt": "Explore backend API implementations..."
+    }
+  ],
+  "comparison_matrix": {
+    "dimension_a": "frontend",
+    "dimension_b": "backend",
+    "comparison_points": [
+      {"aspect": "endpoints", "frontend_check": "fetch URLs", "backend_check": "route paths"},
+      {"aspect": "methods", "frontend_check": "HTTP methods used", "backend_check": "methods accepted"},
+      {"aspect": "payloads", "frontend_check": "request body structure", "backend_check": "expected schema"},
+      {"aspect": "responses", "frontend_check": "response parsing", "backend_check": "response format"},
+      {"aspect": "errors", "frontend_check": "error handling", "backend_check": "error responses"}
+    ]
+  },
+  "success_criteria": [
+    "All API endpoints mapped between frontend and backend",
+    "Discrepancies identified with file:line references",
+    "Each finding includes remediation suggestion"
+  ],
+  "estimated_iterations": 3,
+  "termination_conditions": [
+    "All comparison points verified",
+    "No new findings in last iteration",
+    "Confidence > 0.8 on primary question"
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Iterative Agent Exploration (with ACE)
+
+**Purpose**: Multi-agent iterative exploration using ACE for semantic search within each iteration.
+
+```javascript
+let iteration = 0;
+let cumulativeFindings = [];
+let sharedContext = { aceDiscoveries: [], crossReferences: [] };
+let shouldContinue = true;
+
+while (shouldContinue && iteration < maxIterations) {
+  iteration++;
+  const iterationDir = `${outputDir}/iterations/${iteration}`;
+  await mkdir(iterationDir, { recursive: true });
+
+  // Step 1: ACE-assisted iteration planning
+  // Use previous findings to guide ACE queries for this iteration
+  const iterationAceQueries = iteration === 1
+    ? explorationPlan.dimensions.map(d => d.focus_areas[0])  // Initial queries from plan
+    : deriveQueriesFromFindings(cumulativeFindings);         // Follow-up queries from findings
+
+  // Execute ACE searches to find related code
+  const iterationAceResults = [];
+  for (const query of iterationAceQueries) {
+    const result = await mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+      project_root_path: process.cwd(),
+      query: `${query} in ${explorationPlan.scope}`
+    });
+    iterationAceResults.push({ query, result });
+  }
+
+  // Update shared context with ACE discoveries
+  sharedContext.aceDiscoveries.push(...iterationAceResults);
+
+  // Step 2: Plan this iteration based on ACE results
+  const iterationPlan = planIteration(iteration, explorationPlan, cumulativeFindings, iterationAceResults);
+
+  // Step 3: Launch dimension agents with ACE context
+  const agentPromises = iterationPlan.dimensions.map(dimension =>
+    Task({
+      subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
+      run_in_background: false,
+      description: `Explore ${dimension.name} (iteration ${iteration})`,
+      prompt: buildDimensionPromptWithACE(dimension, iteration, cumulativeFindings, iterationAceResults, iterationDir)
+    })
+  );
+
+  // Wait for iteration agents
+  const iterationResults = await Promise.all(agentPromises);
+
+  // Step 4: Collect and analyze iteration findings
+  const iterationFindings = await collectIterationFindings(iterationDir, iterationPlan.dimensions);
+
+  // Step 5: Cross-reference findings between dimensions
+  if (iterationPlan.dimensions.length > 1) {
+    const crossRefs = findCrossReferences(iterationFindings, iterationPlan.dimensions);
+    sharedContext.crossReferences.push(...crossRefs);
+  }
+
+  cumulativeFindings.push(...iterationFindings);
+
+  // Step 6: Decide whether to continue
+  const convergenceCheck = checkConvergence(iterationFindings, cumulativeFindings, explorationPlan);
+  shouldContinue = !convergenceCheck.converged;
+
+  // Step 7: Update state (iteration summary embedded in state)
+  await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+    iterations: [...state.iterations, {
+      number: iteration,
+      findings_count: iterationFindings.length,
+      ace_queries: iterationAceQueries.length,
+      cross_references: sharedContext.crossReferences.length,
+      new_discoveries: convergenceCheck.newDiscoveries,
+      confidence: convergenceCheck.confidence,
+      continued: shouldContinue
+    }],
+    cumulative_findings: cumulativeFindings
+  });
+}
+```
+
+**ACE in Iteration Loop**:
+
+```
+Iteration N
+    │
+    ├─→ ACE Search (based on previous findings)
+    │   └─ Query: "related code paths for {finding.category}"
+    │   └─ Result: Additional files to explore
+    │
+    ├─→ Agent Exploration (with ACE context)
+    │   └─ Agent receives: dimension targets + ACE suggestions
+    │   └─ Agent can call ACE for deeper search
+    │
+    ├─→ Cross-Reference Analysis
+    │   └─ Compare findings between dimensions
+    │   └─ Identify discrepancies
+    │
+    └─→ Convergence Check
+        └─ New findings? Continue
+        └─ No new findings? Terminate
+```
+
+**Dimension Agent Prompt Template (with ACE)**:
+
+```javascript
+function buildDimensionPromptWithACE(dimension, iteration, previousFindings, aceResults, outputDir) {
+  // Filter ACE results relevant to this dimension
+  const relevantAceResults = aceResults.filter(r =>
+    r.query.includes(dimension.name) || dimension.focus_areas.some(fa => r.query.includes(fa))
+  );
+
+  return `
+    ## Task Objective
+    Explore ${dimension.name} dimension for issue discovery (Iteration ${iteration})
+
+    ## Context
+    - Dimension: ${dimension.name}
+    - Description: ${dimension.description}
+    - Search Targets: ${dimension.search_targets.join(', ')}
+    - Focus Areas: ${dimension.focus_areas.join(', ')}
+
+    ## ACE Semantic Search Results (Pre-gathered)
+    The following files/code sections were identified by ACE as relevant to this dimension:
+    ${JSON.stringify(relevantAceResults.map(r => ({ query: r.query, files: r.result.slice(0, 5) })), null, 2)}
+
+    **Use ACE for deeper exploration**: You have access to mcp__ace-tool__search_context.
+    When you find something interesting, use ACE to find related code:
+    - mcp__ace-tool__search_context({ project_root_path: ".", query: "related to {finding}" })
+
+    ${iteration > 1 ? `
+    ## Previous Findings to Build Upon
+    ${summarizePreviousFindings(previousFindings, dimension.name)}
+
+    ## This Iteration Focus
+    - Explore areas not yet covered (check ACE results for new files)
+    - Verify/deepen previous findings
+    - Follow leads from previous discoveries
+    - Use ACE to find cross-references between dimensions
+    ` : ''}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
+    1. Read exploration plan: ${outputDir}/../exploration-plan.json
+    2. Read schema: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-finding-schema.json
+    3. Review ACE results above for starting points
+    4. Explore files identified by ACE
+
+    ## Exploration Instructions
+    ${dimension.agent_prompt}
+
+    ## ACE Usage Guidelines
+    - Use ACE when you need to find:
+      - Where a function/class is used
+      - Related implementations in other modules
+      - Cross-module dependencies
+      - Similar patterns elsewhere in codebase
+    - Query format: Natural language, be specific
+    - Example: "Where is UserService.authenticate called from?"
+
+    ## Output Requirements
+
+    **1. Write JSON file**: ${outputDir}/${dimension.name}.json
+    Follow discovery-finding-schema.json:
+    - findings: [{id, title, category, description, file, line, snippet, confidence, related_dimension}]
+    - coverage: {files_explored, areas_covered, areas_remaining}
+    - leads: [{description, suggested_search}] // for next iteration
+    - ace_queries_used: [{query, result_count}] // track ACE usage
+
+    **2. Return summary**:
+    - Total findings this iteration
+    - Key discoveries
+    - ACE queries that revealed important code
+    - Recommended next exploration areas
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] JSON written to ${outputDir}/${dimension.name}.json
+    - [ ] Each finding has file:line reference
+    - [ ] ACE used for cross-references where applicable
+    - [ ] Coverage report included
+    - [ ] Leads for next iteration identified
+  `;
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Cross-Analysis & Synthesis
+
+```javascript
+// For comparison intent, perform cross-analysis
+if (intentType === 'comparison' && explorationPlan.comparison_matrix) {
+  const comparisonResults = [];
+
+  for (const point of explorationPlan.comparison_matrix.comparison_points) {
+    const dimensionAFindings = cumulativeFindings.filter(f =>
+      f.related_dimension === explorationPlan.comparison_matrix.dimension_a &&
+      f.category.includes(point.aspect)
+    );
+
+    const dimensionBFindings = cumulativeFindings.filter(f =>
+      f.related_dimension === explorationPlan.comparison_matrix.dimension_b &&
+      f.category.includes(point.aspect)
+    );
+
+    // Compare and find discrepancies
+    const discrepancies = findDiscrepancies(dimensionAFindings, dimensionBFindings, point);
+
+    comparisonResults.push({
+      aspect: point.aspect,
+      dimension_a_count: dimensionAFindings.length,
+      dimension_b_count: dimensionBFindings.length,
+      discrepancies: discrepancies,
+      match_rate: calculateMatchRate(dimensionAFindings, dimensionBFindings)
+    });
+  }
+
+  // Write comparison analysis
+  await writeJson(`${outputDir}/comparison-analysis.json`, {
+    matrix: explorationPlan.comparison_matrix,
+    results: comparisonResults,
+    summary: {
+      total_discrepancies: comparisonResults.reduce((sum, r) => sum + r.discrepancies.length, 0),
+      overall_match_rate: average(comparisonResults.map(r => r.match_rate)),
+      critical_mismatches: comparisonResults.filter(r => r.match_rate < 0.5)
+    }
+  });
+}
+
+// Prioritize all findings
+const prioritizedFindings = prioritizeFindings(cumulativeFindings, explorationPlan);
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary
+
+```javascript
+// Convert high-confidence findings to issues
+const issueWorthy = prioritizedFindings.filter(f =>
+  f.confidence >= 0.7 || f.priority === 'critical' || f.priority === 'high'
+);
+
+const issues = issueWorthy.map(finding => ({
+  id: `ISS-${discoveryId}-${finding.id}`,
+  title: finding.title,
+  description: finding.description,
+  source: {
+    discovery_id: discoveryId,
+    finding_id: finding.id,
+    dimension: finding.related_dimension
+  },
+  file: finding.file,
+  line: finding.line,
+  priority: finding.priority,
+  category: finding.category,
+  suggested_fix: finding.suggested_fix,
+  confidence: finding.confidence,
+  status: 'discovered',
+  created_at: new Date().toISOString()
+}));
+
+// Write issues
+await writeJsonl(`${outputDir}/discovery-issues.jsonl`, issues);
+
+// Update final state (summary embedded in state, no separate file)
+await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+  phase: 'complete',
+  updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  results: {
+    total_iterations: iteration,
+    total_findings: cumulativeFindings.length,
+    issues_generated: issues.length,
+    comparison_match_rate: comparisonResults
+      ? average(comparisonResults.map(r => r.match_rate))
+      : null
+  }
+});
+
+// Prompt user for next action
+await AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: `Discovery complete: ${issues.length} issues from ${cumulativeFindings.length} findings across ${iteration} iterations. What next?`,
+    header: "Next Step",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: "Export to Issues (Recommended)", description: `Export ${issues.length} issues for planning` },
+      { label: "Review Details", description: "View comparison analysis and iteration details" },
+      { label: "Run Deeper", description: "Continue with more iterations" },
+      { label: "Skip", description: "Complete without exporting" }
+    ]
+  }]
+});
+```
+
+## Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/discoveries/
+└── {DBP-YYYYMMDD-HHmmss}/
+    ├── discovery-state.json          # Session state with iteration tracking
+    ├── iterations/
+    │   ├── 1/
+    │   │   └── {dimension}.json      # Dimension findings
+    │   ├── 2/
+    │   │   └── {dimension}.json
+    │   └── ...
+    ├── comparison-analysis.json      # Cross-dimension comparison (if applicable)
+    └── discovery-issues.jsonl        # Generated issue candidates
+```
+
+**Simplified Design**:
+- ACE context and Gemini plan kept in memory, not persisted
+- Iteration summaries embedded in state
+- No separate summary.md (state.json contains all needed info)
+
+## Schema References
+
+| Schema | Path | Used By |
+|--------|------|---------|
+| **Discovery State** | `discovery-state-schema.json` | Orchestrator (state tracking) |
+| **Discovery Finding** | `discovery-finding-schema.json` | Dimension agents (output) |
+| **Exploration Plan** | `exploration-plan-schema.json` | Gemini output validation (memory only) |
+
+## Configuration Options
+
+| Flag | Default | Description |
+|------|---------|-------------|
+| `--scope` | `**/*` | File pattern to explore |
+| `--depth` | `standard` | `standard` (3 iterations) or `deep` (5+ iterations) |
+| `--max-iterations` | 5 | Maximum exploration iterations |
+| `--tool` | `gemini` | Planning tool (gemini/qwen) |
+| `--plan-only` | `false` | Stop after Phase 2 (Gemini planning), show plan for user review |
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Single Module Deep Dive
+
+```bash
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Find all potential issues in the auth module" --scope=src/auth/**
+```
+
+**Gemini plans** (single dimension):
+- Dimension: auth-module
+- Focus: security vulnerabilities, edge cases, error handling, test gaps
+
+**Iterations**: 2-3 (until no new findings)
+
+### Example 2: API Contract Comparison
+
+```bash
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Check if API calls match implementations" --scope=src/**
+```
+
+**Gemini plans** (comparison):
+- Dimension 1: api-consumers (fetch calls, hooks, services)
+- Dimension 2: api-providers (handlers, routes, controllers)
+- Comparison matrix: endpoints, methods, payloads, responses
+
+### Example 3: Multi-Module Audit
+
+```bash
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Audit the payment flow for issues" --scope=src/payment/**
+```
+
+**Gemini plans** (multi-dimension):
+- Dimension 1: payment-logic (calculations, state transitions)
+- Dimension 2: validation (input checks, business rules)
+- Dimension 3: error-handling (failure modes, recovery)
+
+### Example 4: Plan Only Mode
+
+```bash
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "Find inconsistent patterns" --plan-only
+```
+
+Stops after Gemini planning, outputs:
+```
+Gemini Plan:
+- Intent: search
+- Dimensions: 2 (pattern-definitions, pattern-usages)
+- Estimated iterations: 3
+
+Continue with exploration? [Y/n]
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+
+```bash
+# After discovery, plan solutions
+/issue:plan DBP-001-01,DBP-001-02
+
+# View all discoveries
+/issue:manage
+
+# Standard perspective-based discovery
+/issue:discover src/auth/** --perspectives=security,bug
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Be Specific in Prompts**: More specific prompts lead to better Gemini planning
+2. **Scope Appropriately**: Narrow scope for focused comparison, wider for audits
+3. **Review Exploration Plan**: Check `exploration-plan.json` before long explorations
+4. **Use Standard Depth First**: Start with standard, go deep only if needed
+5. **Combine with `/issue:discover`**: Use prompt-based for comparisons, perspective-based for audits

.claude/commands/issue/discover.md

@@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
+---
+name: issue:discover
+description: Discover potential issues from multiple perspectives (bug, UX, test, quality, security, performance, maintainability, best-practices) using CLI explore. Supports Exa external research for security and best-practices perspectives.
+argument-hint: "<path-pattern> [--perspectives=bug,ux,...] [--external]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Glob(*), Grep(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Discovery Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Discover issues in specific module (interactive perspective selection)
+/issue:discover src/auth/**
+
+# Discover with specific perspectives
+/issue:discover src/payment/** --perspectives=bug,security,test
+
+# Discover with external research for all perspectives
+/issue:discover src/api/** --external
+
+# Discover in multiple modules
+/issue:discover src/auth/**,src/payment/**
+```
+
+**Discovery Scope**: Specified modules/files only
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/issues/discoveries/{discovery-id}/`
+**Available Perspectives**: bug, ux, test, quality, security, performance, maintainability, best-practices
+**Exa Integration**: Auto-enabled for security and best-practices perspectives
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Multi-perspective issue discovery orchestrator that explores code from different angles to identify potential bugs, UX improvements, test gaps, and other actionable items. Unlike code review (which assesses existing code quality), discovery focuses on **finding opportunities for improvement and potential problems**.
+
+**vs Code Review**:
+- **Code Review** (`review-module-cycle`): Evaluates code quality against standards
+- **Issue Discovery** (`issue:discover`): Finds actionable issues, bugs, and improvement opportunities
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Proactive Issue Detection**: Find problems before they become bugs
+2. **Multi-Perspective Analysis**: Each perspective surfaces different types of issues
+3. **External Benchmarking**: Compare against industry best practices via Exa
+4. **Direct Issue Integration**: Discoveries can be exported to issue tracker
+5. **Dashboard Management**: View, filter, and export discoveries via CCW dashboard
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Parse target pattern, create session, initialize output structure
+
+Phase 2: Interactive Perspective Selection
+   └─ AskUserQuestion for perspective selection (or use --perspectives)
+
+Phase 3: Parallel Perspective Analysis
+   ├─ Launch N @cli-explore-agent instances (one per perspective)
+   ├─ Security & Best-Practices auto-trigger Exa research
+   ├─ Agent writes perspective JSON, returns summary
+   └─ Update discovery-progress.json
+
+Phase 4: Aggregation & Prioritization
+   ├─ Collect agent return summaries
+   ├─ Load perspective JSON files
+   ├─ Merge findings, deduplicate by file+line
+   └─ Calculate priority scores
+
+Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary
+   ├─ Convert high-priority discoveries to issue format
+   ├─ Write to discovery-issues.jsonl
+   ├─ Generate single summary.md from agent returns
+   └─ Update discovery-state.json to complete
+
+Phase 6: User Action Prompt
+   └─ AskUserQuestion for next step (export/dashboard/skip)
+```
+
+## Perspectives
+
+### Available Perspectives
+
+| Perspective | Focus | Categories | Exa |
+|-------------|-------|------------|-----|
+| **bug** | Potential Bugs | edge-case, null-check, resource-leak, race-condition, boundary, exception-handling | - |
+| **ux** | User Experience | error-message, loading-state, feedback, accessibility, interaction, consistency | - |
+| **test** | Test Coverage | missing-test, edge-case-test, integration-gap, coverage-hole, assertion-quality | - |
+| **quality** | Code Quality | complexity, duplication, naming, documentation, code-smell, readability | - |
+| **security** | Security Issues | injection, auth, encryption, input-validation, data-exposure, access-control | ✓ |
+| **performance** | Performance | n-plus-one, memory-usage, caching, algorithm, blocking-operation, resource | - |
+| **maintainability** | Maintainability | coupling, cohesion, tech-debt, extensibility, module-boundary, interface-design | - |
+| **best-practices** | Best Practices | convention, pattern, framework-usage, anti-pattern, industry-standard | ✓ |
+
+### Interactive Perspective Selection
+
+When no `--perspectives` flag is provided, the command uses AskUserQuestion:
+
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Select primary discovery focus:",
+    header: "Focus",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: "Bug + Test + Quality", description: "Quick scan: potential bugs, test gaps, code quality (Recommended)" },
+      { label: "Security + Performance", description: "System audit: security issues, performance bottlenecks" },
+      { label: "Maintainability + Best-practices", description: "Long-term health: coupling, tech debt, conventions" },
+      { label: "Full analysis", description: "All 7 perspectives (comprehensive, takes longer)" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Recommended Combinations**:
+- Quick scan: bug, test, quality
+- Full analysis: all perspectives
+- Security audit: security, bug, quality
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Parse target pattern and resolve files
+const resolvedFiles = await expandGlobPattern(targetPattern);
+if (resolvedFiles.length === 0) {
+  throw new Error(`No files matched pattern: ${targetPattern}`);
+}
+
+// Step 2: Generate discovery ID
+const discoveryId = `DSC-${formatDate(new Date(), 'YYYYMMDD-HHmmss')}`;
+
+// Step 3: Create output directory
+const outputDir = `.workflow/issues/discoveries/${discoveryId}`;
+await mkdir(outputDir, { recursive: true });
+await mkdir(`${outputDir}/perspectives`, { recursive: true });
+
+// Step 4: Initialize unified discovery state (merged state+progress)
+await writeJson(`${outputDir}/discovery-state.json`, {
+  discovery_id: discoveryId,
+  target_pattern: targetPattern,
+  phase: "initialization",
+  created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  target: { files_count: { total: resolvedFiles.length }, project: {} },
+  perspectives: [],  // filled after selection: [{name, status, findings}]
+  external_research: { enabled: false, completed: false },
+  results: { total_findings: 0, issues_generated: 0, priority_distribution: {} }
+});
+```
+
+**Phase 2: Perspective Selection**
+
+```javascript
+// Check for --perspectives flag
+let selectedPerspectives = [];
+
+if (args.perspectives) {
+  selectedPerspectives = args.perspectives.split(',').map(p => p.trim());
+} else {
+  // Interactive selection via AskUserQuestion
+  const response = await AskUserQuestion({...});
+  selectedPerspectives = parseSelectedPerspectives(response);
+}
+
+// Validate and update state
+await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+  'metadata.perspectives': selectedPerspectives,
+  phase: 'parallel'
+});
+```
+
+**Phase 3: Parallel Perspective Analysis**
+
+Launch N agents in parallel (one per selected perspective):
+
+```javascript
+// Launch agents in parallel - agents write JSON and return summary
+const agentPromises = selectedPerspectives.map(perspective =>
+  Task({
+    subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
+    run_in_background: false,
+    description: `Discover ${perspective} issues`,
+    prompt: buildPerspectivePrompt(perspective, discoveryId, resolvedFiles, outputDir)
+  })
+);
+
+// Wait for all agents - collect their return summaries
+const results = await Promise.all(agentPromises);
+// results contain agent summaries for final report
+```
+
+**Phase 4: Aggregation & Prioritization**
+
+```javascript
+// Load all perspective JSON files written by agents
+const allFindings = [];
+for (const perspective of selectedPerspectives) {
+  const jsonPath = `${outputDir}/perspectives/${perspective}.json`;
+  if (await fileExists(jsonPath)) {
+    const data = await readJson(jsonPath);
+    allFindings.push(...data.findings.map(f => ({ ...f, perspective })));
+  }
+}
+
+// Deduplicate and prioritize
+const prioritizedFindings = deduplicateAndPrioritize(allFindings);
+
+// Update unified state
+await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+  phase: 'aggregation',
+  'results.total_findings': prioritizedFindings.length,
+  'results.priority_distribution': countByPriority(prioritizedFindings)
+});
+```
+
+**Phase 5: Issue Generation & Summary**
+
+```javascript
+// Convert high-priority findings to issues
+const issueWorthy = prioritizedFindings.filter(f =>
+  f.priority === 'critical' || f.priority === 'high' || f.priority_score >= 0.7
+);
+
+// Write discovery-issues.jsonl
+await writeJsonl(`${outputDir}/discovery-issues.jsonl`, issues);
+
+// Generate single summary.md from agent return summaries
+// Orchestrator briefly summarizes what agents returned (NO detailed reports)
+await writeSummaryFromAgentReturns(outputDir, results, prioritizedFindings, issues);
+
+// Update final state
+await updateDiscoveryState(outputDir, {
+  phase: 'complete',
+  updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  'results.issues_generated': issues.length
+});
+```
+
+**Phase 6: User Action Prompt**
+
+```javascript
+// Prompt user for next action based on discovery results
+const hasHighPriority = issues.some(i => i.priority === 'critical' || i.priority === 'high');
+const hasMediumFindings = prioritizedFindings.some(f => f.priority === 'medium');
+
+await AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: `Discovery complete: ${issues.length} issues generated, ${prioritizedFindings.length} total findings. What would you like to do next?`,
+    header: "Next Step",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: hasHighPriority ? [
+      { label: "Export to Issues (Recommended)", description: `${issues.length} high-priority issues found - export to issue tracker for planning` },
+      { label: "Open Dashboard", description: "Review findings in ccw view before exporting" },
+      { label: "Skip", description: "Complete discovery without exporting" }
+    ] : hasMediumFindings ? [
+      { label: "Open Dashboard (Recommended)", description: "Review medium-priority findings in ccw view to decide which to export" },
+      { label: "Export to Issues", description: `Export ${issues.length} issues to tracker` },
+      { label: "Skip", description: "Complete discovery without exporting" }
+    ] : [
+      { label: "Skip (Recommended)", description: "No significant issues found - complete discovery" },
+      { label: "Open Dashboard", description: "Review all findings in ccw view" },
+      { label: "Export to Issues", description: `Export ${issues.length} issues anyway` }
+    ]
+  }]
+});
+
+// Handle response
+if (response === "Export to Issues") {
+  // Append to issues.jsonl
+  await appendJsonl('.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl', issues);
+  console.log(`Exported ${issues.length} issues. Run /issue:plan to continue.`);
+} else if (response === "Open Dashboard") {
+  console.log('Run `ccw view` and navigate to Issues > Discovery to manage findings.');
+}
+```
+
+### Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/discoveries/
+├── index.json                           # Discovery session index
+└── {discovery-id}/
+    ├── discovery-state.json             # Unified state (merged state+progress)
+    ├── perspectives/
+    │   └── {perspective}.json           # Per-perspective findings
+    ├── external-research.json           # Exa research results (if enabled)
+    ├── discovery-issues.jsonl           # Generated candidate issues
+    └── summary.md                       # Single summary (from agent returns)
+```
+
+### Schema References
+
+**External Schema Files** (agent MUST read and follow exactly):
+
+| Schema | Path | Purpose |
+|--------|------|---------|
+| **Discovery State** | `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-state-schema.json` | Session state machine |
+| **Discovery Finding** | `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-finding-schema.json` | Perspective analysis results |
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Perspective Analysis Agent**:
+
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background: false,
+  description: `Discover ${perspective} issues`,
+  prompt: `
+    ## Task Objective
+    Discover potential ${perspective} issues in specified module files.
+
+    ## Discovery Context
+    - Discovery ID: ${discoveryId}
+    - Perspective: ${perspective}
+    - Target Pattern: ${targetPattern}
+    - Resolved Files: ${resolvedFiles.length} files
+    - Output Directory: ${outputDir}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
+    1. Read discovery state: ${outputDir}/discovery-state.json
+    2. Read schema: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/discovery-finding-schema.json
+    3. Analyze target files for ${perspective} concerns
+
+    ## Output Requirements
+
+    **1. Write JSON file**: ${outputDir}/perspectives/${perspective}.json
+    - Follow discovery-finding-schema.json exactly
+    - Each finding: id, title, priority, category, description, file, line, snippet, suggested_issue, confidence
+
+    **2. Return summary** (DO NOT write report file):
+    - Return a brief text summary of findings
+    - Include: total findings, priority breakdown, key issues
+    - This summary will be used by orchestrator for final report
+
+    ## Perspective-Specific Guidance
+    ${getPerspectiveGuidance(perspective)}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] JSON written to ${outputDir}/perspectives/${perspective}.json
+    - [ ] Summary returned with findings count and key issues
+    - [ ] Each finding includes actionable suggested_issue
+    - [ ] Priority uses lowercase enum: critical/high/medium/low
+  `
+})
+```
+
+**Exa Research Agent** (for security and best-practices):
+
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background: false,
+  description: `External research for ${perspective} via Exa`,
+  prompt: `
+    ## Task Objective
+    Research industry best practices for ${perspective} using Exa search
+
+    ## Research Steps
+    1. Read project tech stack: .workflow/project-tech.json
+    2. Use Exa to search for best practices
+    3. Synthesize findings relevant to this project
+
+    ## Output Requirements
+
+    **1. Write JSON file**: ${outputDir}/external-research.json
+    - Include sources, key_findings, gap_analysis, recommendations
+
+    **2. Return summary** (DO NOT write report file):
+    - Brief summary of external research findings
+    - Key recommendations for the project
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] JSON written to ${outputDir}/external-research.json
+    - [ ] Summary returned with key recommendations
+    - [ ] Findings are relevant to project's tech stack
+  `
+})
+```
+
+### Perspective Guidance Reference
+
+```javascript
+function getPerspectiveGuidance(perspective) {
+  const guidance = {
+    bug: `
+      Focus: Null checks, edge cases, resource leaks, race conditions, boundary conditions, exception handling
+      Priority: Critical=data corruption/crash, High=malfunction, Medium=edge case issues, Low=minor
+    `,
+    ux: `
+      Focus: Error messages, loading states, feedback, accessibility, interaction patterns, form validation
+      Priority: Critical=inaccessible, High=confusing, Medium=inconsistent, Low=cosmetic
+    `,
+    test: `
+      Focus: Missing unit tests, edge case coverage, integration gaps, assertion quality, test isolation
+      Priority: Critical=no security tests, High=no core logic tests, Medium=weak coverage, Low=minor gaps
+    `,
+    quality: `
+      Focus: Complexity, duplication, naming, documentation, code smells, readability
+      Priority: Critical=unmaintainable, High=significant issues, Medium=naming/docs, Low=minor refactoring
+    `,
+    security: `
+      Focus: Input validation, auth/authz, injection, XSS/CSRF, data exposure, access control
+      Priority: Critical=auth bypass/injection, High=missing authz, Medium=weak validation, Low=headers
+    `,
+    performance: `
+      Focus: N+1 queries, memory leaks, caching, algorithm efficiency, blocking operations
+      Priority: Critical=memory leaks, High=N+1/inefficient, Medium=missing cache, Low=minor optimization
+    `,
+    maintainability: `
+      Focus: Coupling, interface design, tech debt, extensibility, module boundaries, configuration
+      Priority: Critical=unrelated code changes, High=unclear boundaries, Medium=coupling, Low=refactoring
+    `,
+    'best-practices': `
+      Focus: Framework conventions, language patterns, anti-patterns, deprecated APIs, coding standards
+      Priority: Critical=anti-patterns causing bugs, High=convention violations, Medium=style, Low=cosmetic
+    `
+  };
+  return guidance[perspective] || 'General code discovery analysis';
+}
+```
+
+## Dashboard Integration
+
+### Viewing Discoveries
+
+Open CCW dashboard to manage discoveries:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+Navigate to **Issues > Discovery** to:
+- View all discovery sessions
+- Filter findings by perspective and priority
+- Preview finding details
+- Select and export findings as issues
+
+### Exporting to Issues
+
+From the dashboard, select findings and click "Export as Issues" to:
+1. Convert discoveries to standard issue format
+2. Append to `.workflow/issues/issues.jsonl`
+3. Set status to `registered`
+4. Continue with `/issue:plan` workflow
+
+## Related Commands
+
+```bash
+# After discovery, plan solutions for exported issues
+/issue:plan DSC-001,DSC-002,DSC-003
+
+# Or use interactive management
+/issue:manage
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Start Focused**: Begin with specific modules rather than entire codebase
+2. **Use Quick Scan First**: Start with bug, test, quality for fast results
+3. **Review Before Export**: Not all discoveries warrant issues - use dashboard to filter
+4. **Combine Perspectives**: Run related perspectives together (e.g., security + bug)
+5. **Enable Exa for New Tech**: When using unfamiliar frameworks, enable external research

.claude/commands/issue/execute.md

@@ -0,0 +1,466 @@
+---
+name: execute
+description: Execute queue with DAG-based parallel orchestration (one commit per solution)
+argument-hint: "[--worktree [<existing-path>]] [--queue <queue-id>]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Execute Command (/issue:execute)
+
+## Overview
+
+Minimal orchestrator that dispatches **solution IDs** to executors. Each executor receives a complete solution with all its tasks.
+
+**Design Principles:**
+- `queue dag` → returns parallel batches with solution IDs (S-1, S-2, ...)
+- `detail <id>` → READ-ONLY solution fetch (returns full solution with all tasks)
+- `done <id>` → update solution completion status
+- No race conditions: status changes only via `done`
+- **Executor handles all tasks within a solution sequentially**
+- **Single worktree for entire queue**: One worktree isolates ALL queue execution from main workspace
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/issue:execute                           # Execute active queue(s)
+/issue:execute --queue QUE-xxx           # Execute specific queue
+/issue:execute --worktree                # Execute entire queue in isolated worktree
+/issue:execute --worktree --queue QUE-xxx
+/issue:execute --worktree /path/to/existing/worktree  # Resume in existing worktree
+```
+
+**Parallelism**: Determined automatically by task dependency DAG (no manual control)
+**Executor & Dry-run**: Selected via interactive prompt (AskUserQuestion)
+**Worktree**: Creates ONE worktree for the entire queue execution (not per-solution)
+
+**⭐ Recommended Executor**: **Codex** - Best for long-running autonomous work (2hr timeout), supports background execution and full write access
+
+**Worktree Options**:
+- `--worktree` - Create a new worktree with timestamp-based name
+- `--worktree <existing-path>` - Resume in an existing worktree (for recovery/continuation)
+
+**Resume**: Use `git worktree list` to find existing worktrees from interrupted executions
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 0 (if --worktree): Setup Queue Worktree
+   ├─ Create ONE worktree for entire queue: .ccw/worktrees/queue-<timestamp>
+   ├─ All subsequent execution happens in this worktree
+   └─ Main workspace remains clean and untouched
+
+Phase 1: Get DAG & User Selection
+   ├─ ccw issue queue dag [--queue QUE-xxx] → { parallel_batches: [["S-1","S-2"], ["S-3"]] }
+   └─ AskUserQuestion → executor type (codex|gemini|agent), dry-run mode, worktree mode
+
+Phase 2: Dispatch Parallel Batch (DAG-driven)
+   ├─ Parallelism determined by DAG (no manual limit)
+   ├─ All executors work in the SAME worktree (or main if no worktree)
+   ├─ For each solution ID in batch (parallel - all at once):
+   │   ├─ Executor calls: ccw issue detail <id>  (READ-ONLY)
+   │   ├─ Executor gets FULL SOLUTION with all tasks
+   │   ├─ Executor implements all tasks sequentially (T1 → T2 → T3)
+   │   ├─ Executor tests + verifies each task
+   │   ├─ Executor commits ONCE per solution (with formatted summary)
+   │   └─ Executor calls: ccw issue done <id>
+   └─ Wait for batch completion
+
+Phase 3: Next Batch (repeat Phase 2)
+   └─ ccw issue queue dag → check for newly-ready solutions
+
+Phase 4 (if --worktree): Worktree Completion
+   ├─ All batches complete → prompt for merge strategy
+   └─ Options: Create PR / Merge to main / Keep branch
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Get DAG & User Selection
+
+```javascript
+// Get dependency graph and parallel batches
+const dagJson = Bash(`ccw issue queue dag`).trim();
+const dag = JSON.parse(dagJson);
+
+if (dag.error || dag.ready_count === 0) {
+  console.log(dag.error || 'No solutions ready for execution');
+  console.log('Use /issue:queue to form a queue first');
+  return;
+}
+
+console.log(`
+## Queue DAG (Solution-Level)
+
+- Total Solutions: ${dag.total}
+- Ready: ${dag.ready_count}
+- Completed: ${dag.completed_count}
+- Parallel in batch 1: ${dag.parallel_batches[0]?.length || 0}
+`);
+
+// Interactive selection via AskUserQuestion
+const answer = AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: 'Select executor type:',
+      header: 'Executor',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'Codex (Recommended)', description: 'Autonomous coding with full write access' },
+        { label: 'Gemini', description: 'Large context analysis and implementation' },
+        { label: 'Agent', description: 'Claude Code sub-agent for complex tasks' }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: 'Execution mode:',
+      header: 'Mode',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'Execute (Recommended)', description: 'Run all ready solutions' },
+        { label: 'Dry-run', description: 'Show DAG and batches without executing' }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: 'Use git worktree for queue isolation?',
+      header: 'Worktree',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'Yes (Recommended)', description: 'Create ONE worktree for entire queue - main stays clean' },
+        { label: 'No', description: 'Work directly in current directory' }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+});
+
+const executor = answer['Executor'].toLowerCase().split(' ')[0];  // codex|gemini|agent
+const isDryRun = answer['Mode'].includes('Dry-run');
+const useWorktree = answer['Worktree'].includes('Yes');
+
+// Dry run mode
+if (isDryRun) {
+  console.log('### Parallel Batches (Dry-run):\n');
+  dag.parallel_batches.forEach((batch, i) => {
+    console.log(`Batch ${i + 1}: ${batch.join(', ')}`);
+  });
+  return;
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 0 & 2: Setup Queue Worktree & Dispatch
+
+```javascript
+// Parallelism determined by DAG - no manual limit
+// All solutions in same batch have NO file conflicts and can run in parallel
+const batch = dag.parallel_batches[0] || [];
+
+// Initialize TodoWrite
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: batch.map(id => ({
+    content: `Execute solution ${id}`,
+    status: 'pending',
+    activeForm: `Executing solution ${id}`
+  }))
+});
+
+console.log(`\n### Executing Solutions (DAG batch 1): ${batch.join(', ')}`);
+
+// Parse existing worktree path from args if provided
+// Example: --worktree /path/to/existing/worktree
+const existingWorktree = args.worktree && typeof args.worktree === 'string' ? args.worktree : null;
+
+// Setup ONE worktree for entire queue (not per-solution)
+let worktreePath = null;
+let worktreeBranch = null;
+
+if (useWorktree) {
+  const repoRoot = Bash('git rev-parse --show-toplevel').trim();
+  const worktreeBase = `${repoRoot}/.ccw/worktrees`;
+  Bash(`mkdir -p "${worktreeBase}"`);
+  Bash('git worktree prune');  // Cleanup stale worktrees
+
+  if (existingWorktree) {
+    // Resume mode: Use existing worktree
+    worktreePath = existingWorktree;
+    worktreeBranch = Bash(`git -C "${worktreePath}" branch --show-current`).trim();
+    console.log(`Resuming in existing worktree: ${worktreePath} (branch: ${worktreeBranch})`);
+  } else {
+    // Create mode: ONE worktree for the entire queue
+    const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[-:T]/g, '').slice(0, 14);
+    worktreeBranch = `queue-exec-${dag.queue_id || timestamp}`;
+    worktreePath = `${worktreeBase}/${worktreeBranch}`;
+    Bash(`git worktree add "${worktreePath}" -b "${worktreeBranch}"`);
+    console.log(`Created queue worktree: ${worktreePath}`);
+  }
+}
+
+// Launch ALL solutions in batch in parallel (DAG guarantees no conflicts)
+// All executors work in the SAME worktree (or main if no worktree)
+const executions = batch.map(solutionId => {
+  updateTodo(solutionId, 'in_progress');
+  return dispatchExecutor(solutionId, executor, worktreePath);
+});
+
+await Promise.all(executions);
+batch.forEach(id => updateTodo(id, 'completed'));
+```
+
+### Executor Dispatch
+
+```javascript
+// worktreePath: path to shared worktree (null if not using worktree)
+function dispatchExecutor(solutionId, executorType, worktreePath = null) {
+  // If worktree is provided, executor works in that directory
+  // No per-solution worktree creation - ONE worktree for entire queue
+  const cdCommand = worktreePath ? `cd "${worktreePath}"` : '';
+
+  const prompt = `
+## Execute Solution ${solutionId}
+${worktreePath ? `
+### Step 0: Enter Queue Worktree
+\`\`\`bash
+cd "${worktreePath}"
+\`\`\`
+` : ''}
+### Step 1: Get Solution (read-only)
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw issue detail ${solutionId}
+\`\`\`
+
+### Step 2: Execute All Tasks Sequentially
+The detail command returns a FULL SOLUTION with all tasks.
+Execute each task in order (T1 → T2 → T3 → ...):
+
+For each task:
+1. Follow task.implementation steps
+2. Run task.test commands
+3. Verify task.acceptance criteria
+(Do NOT commit after each task)
+
+### Step 3: Commit Solution (Once)
+After ALL tasks pass, commit once with formatted summary:
+\`\`\`bash
+git add <all-modified-files>
+git commit -m "[type](scope): [solution.description]
+
+## Solution Summary
+- Solution-ID: ${solutionId}
+- Tasks: T1, T2, ...
+
+## Tasks Completed
+- [T1] task1.title: action
+- [T2] task2.title: action
+
+## Files Modified
+- file1.ts
+- file2.ts
+
+## Verification
+- All tests passed
+- All acceptance criteria verified"
+\`\`\`
+
+### Step 4: Report Completion
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw issue done ${solutionId} --result '{"summary": "...", "files_modified": [...], "commit": {"hash": "...", "type": "feat"}, "tasks_completed": N}'
+\`\`\`
+
+If any task failed:
+\`\`\`bash
+ccw issue done ${solutionId} --fail --reason '{"task_id": "TX", "error_type": "test_failure", "message": "..."}'
+\`\`\`
+
+**Note**: Do NOT cleanup worktree after this solution. Worktree is shared by all solutions in the queue.
+`;
+
+  // For CLI tools, pass --cd to set working directory
+  const cdOption = worktreePath ? ` --cd "${worktreePath}"` : '';
+
+  if (executorType === 'codex') {
+    return Bash(
+      `ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(prompt)}" --tool codex --mode write --id exec-${solutionId}${cdOption}`,
+      { timeout: 7200000, run_in_background: true }  // 2hr for full solution
+    );
+  } else if (executorType === 'gemini') {
+    return Bash(
+      `ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(prompt)}" --tool gemini --mode write --id exec-${solutionId}${cdOption}`,
+      { timeout: 3600000, run_in_background: true }
+    );
+  } else {
+    return Task({
+      subagent_type: 'code-developer',
+      run_in_background: false,
+      description: `Execute solution ${solutionId}`,
+      prompt: worktreePath ? `Working directory: ${worktreePath}\n\n${prompt}` : prompt
+    });
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Check Next Batch
+
+```javascript
+// Refresh DAG after batch completes
+const refreshedDag = JSON.parse(Bash(`ccw issue queue dag`).trim());
+
+console.log(`
+## Batch Complete
+
+- Solutions Completed: ${refreshedDag.completed_count}/${refreshedDag.total}
+- Next ready: ${refreshedDag.ready_count}
+`);
+
+if (refreshedDag.ready_count > 0) {
+  console.log('Run `/issue:execute` again for next batch.');
+  // Note: If resuming, pass existing worktree path:
+  // /issue:execute --worktree <worktreePath>
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Worktree Completion (after ALL batches)
+
+```javascript
+// Only run when ALL solutions completed AND using worktree
+if (useWorktree && refreshedDag.ready_count === 0 && refreshedDag.completed_count === refreshedDag.total) {
+  console.log('\n## All Solutions Completed - Worktree Cleanup');
+
+  const answer = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: `Queue complete. What to do with worktree branch "${worktreeBranch}"?`,
+      header: 'Merge',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'Create PR (Recommended)', description: 'Push branch and create pull request' },
+        { label: 'Merge to main', description: 'Merge all commits and cleanup worktree' },
+        { label: 'Keep branch', description: 'Cleanup worktree, keep branch for manual handling' }
+      ]
+    }]
+  });
+
+  const repoRoot = Bash('git rev-parse --show-toplevel').trim();
+
+  if (answer['Merge'].includes('Create PR')) {
+    Bash(`git -C "${worktreePath}" push -u origin "${worktreeBranch}"`);
+    Bash(`gh pr create --title "Queue ${dag.queue_id}" --body "Issue queue execution - all solutions completed" --head "${worktreeBranch}"`);
+    Bash(`git worktree remove "${worktreePath}"`);
+    console.log(`PR created for branch: ${worktreeBranch}`);
+  } else if (answer['Merge'].includes('Merge to main')) {
+    // Check main is clean
+    const mainDirty = Bash('git status --porcelain').trim();
+    if (mainDirty) {
+      console.log('Warning: Main has uncommitted changes. Falling back to PR.');
+      Bash(`git -C "${worktreePath}" push -u origin "${worktreeBranch}"`);
+      Bash(`gh pr create --title "Queue ${dag.queue_id}" --body "Issue queue execution (main had uncommitted changes)" --head "${worktreeBranch}"`);
+    } else {
+      Bash(`git merge --no-ff "${worktreeBranch}" -m "Merge queue ${dag.queue_id}"`);
+      Bash(`git branch -d "${worktreeBranch}"`);
+    }
+    Bash(`git worktree remove "${worktreePath}"`);
+  } else {
+    Bash(`git worktree remove "${worktreePath}"`);
+    console.log(`Branch ${worktreeBranch} kept for manual handling`);
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Parallel Execution Model
+
+```
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ Orchestrator                                                    │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ 0. (if --worktree) Create ONE worktree for entire queue         │
+│    → .ccw/worktrees/queue-exec-<queue-id>                       │
+│                                                                 │
+│ 1. ccw issue queue dag                                          │
+│    → { parallel_batches: [["S-1","S-2"], ["S-3"]] }             │
+│                                                                 │
+│ 2. Dispatch batch 1 (parallel, SAME worktree):                  │
+│    ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐     │
+│    │        Shared Queue Worktree (or main)               │     │
+│    │  ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐          │     │
+│    │  │ Executor 1       │ │ Executor 2       │          │     │
+│    │  │ detail S-1       │ │ detail S-2       │          │     │
+│    │  │ [T1→T2→T3]       │ │ [T1→T2]          │          │     │
+│    │  │ commit S-1       │ │ commit S-2       │          │     │
+│    │  │ done S-1         │ │ done S-2         │          │     │
+│    │  └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘          │     │
+│    └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘     │
+│                                                                 │
+│ 3. ccw issue queue dag (refresh)                                │
+│    → S-3 now ready → dispatch batch 2 (same worktree)           │
+│                                                                 │
+│ 4. (if --worktree) ALL batches complete → cleanup worktree      │
+│    → Prompt: Create PR / Merge to main / Keep branch            │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+```
+
+**Why this works for parallel:**
+- **ONE worktree for entire queue** → all solutions share same isolated workspace
+- `detail <id>` is READ-ONLY → no race conditions
+- Each executor handles **all tasks within a solution** sequentially
+- **One commit per solution** with formatted summary (not per-task)
+- `done <id>` updates only its own solution status
+- `queue dag` recalculates ready solutions after each batch
+- Solutions in same batch have NO file conflicts (DAG guarantees)
+- **Main workspace stays clean** until merge/PR decision
+
+## CLI Endpoint Contract
+
+### `ccw issue queue dag`
+Returns dependency graph with parallel batches (solution-level):
+```json
+{
+  "queue_id": "QUE-...",
+  "total": 3,
+  "ready_count": 2,
+  "completed_count": 0,
+  "nodes": [
+    { "id": "S-1", "issue_id": "ISS-xxx", "status": "pending", "ready": true, "task_count": 3 },
+    { "id": "S-2", "issue_id": "ISS-yyy", "status": "pending", "ready": true, "task_count": 2 },
+    { "id": "S-3", "issue_id": "ISS-zzz", "status": "pending", "ready": false, "depends_on": ["S-1"] }
+  ],
+  "parallel_batches": [["S-1", "S-2"], ["S-3"]]
+}
+```
+
+### `ccw issue detail <item_id>`
+Returns FULL SOLUTION with all tasks (READ-ONLY):
+```json
+{
+  "item_id": "S-1",
+  "issue_id": "ISS-xxx",
+  "solution_id": "SOL-xxx",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "solution": {
+    "id": "SOL-xxx",
+    "approach": "...",
+    "tasks": [
+      { "id": "T1", "title": "...", "implementation": [...], "test": {...} },
+      { "id": "T2", "title": "...", "implementation": [...], "test": {...} },
+      { "id": "T3", "title": "...", "implementation": [...], "test": {...} }
+    ],
+    "exploration_context": { "relevant_files": [...] }
+  },
+  "execution_hints": { "executor": "codex", "estimated_minutes": 180 }
+}
+```
+
+### `ccw issue done <item_id>`
+Marks solution completed/failed, updates queue state, checks for queue completion.
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| No queue | Run /issue:queue first |
+| No ready solutions | Dependencies blocked, check DAG |
+| Executor timeout | Solution not marked done, can retry |
+| Solution failure | Use `ccw issue retry` to reset |
+| Partial task failure | Executor reports which task failed via `done --fail` |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:plan` - Plan issues with solutions
+- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue
+- `ccw issue queue dag` - View dependency graph
+- `ccw issue detail <id>` - View task details
+- `ccw issue retry` - Reset failed tasks

.claude/commands/issue/new.md

@@ -0,0 +1,413 @@
+---
+name: new
+description: Create structured issue from GitHub URL or text description
+argument-hint: "<github-url | text-description> [--priority 1-5]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), AskUserQuestion(*), mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*)
+---
+
+# Issue New Command (/issue:new)
+
+## Core Principle
+
+**Requirement Clarity Detection** → Ask only when needed
+
+```
+Clear Input (GitHub URL, structured text)  → Direct creation
+Unclear Input (vague description)          → Minimal clarifying questions
+```
+
+## Issue Structure 
+
+```typescript
+interface Issue {
+  id: string;                    // GH-123 or ISS-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS
+  title: string;
+  status: 'registered' | 'planned' | 'queued' | 'in_progress' | 'completed' | 'failed';
+  priority: number;              // 1 (critical) to 5 (low)
+  context: string;               // Problem description (single source of truth)
+  source: 'github' | 'text' | 'discovery';
+  source_url?: string;
+  labels?: string[];
+
+  // GitHub binding (for non-GitHub sources that publish to GitHub)
+  github_url?: string;           // https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123
+  github_number?: number;        // 123
+
+  // Optional structured fields
+  expected_behavior?: string;
+  actual_behavior?: string;
+  affected_components?: string[];
+
+  // Feedback history (failures + human clarifications)
+  feedback?: {
+    type: 'failure' | 'clarification' | 'rejection';
+    stage: string;               // new/plan/execute
+    content: string;
+    created_at: string;
+  }[];
+
+  // Solution binding
+  bound_solution_id: string | null;
+
+  // Timestamps
+  created_at: string;
+  updated_at: string;
+}
+```
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+```bash
+# Clear inputs - direct creation
+/issue:new https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123
+/issue:new "Login fails with special chars. Expected: success. Actual: 500 error"
+
+# Vague input - will ask clarifying questions
+/issue:new "something wrong with auth"
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Input Analysis & Clarity Detection
+
+```javascript
+const input = userInput.trim();
+const flags = parseFlags(userInput);  // --priority
+
+// Detect input type and clarity
+const isGitHubUrl = input.match(/github\.com\/[\w-]+\/[\w-]+\/issues\/\d+/);
+const isGitHubShort = input.match(/^#(\d+)$/);
+const hasStructure = input.match(/(expected|actual|affects|steps):/i);
+
+// Clarity score: 0-3
+let clarityScore = 0;
+if (isGitHubUrl || isGitHubShort) clarityScore = 3;  // GitHub = fully clear
+else if (hasStructure) clarityScore = 2;             // Structured text = clear
+else if (input.length > 50) clarityScore = 1;        // Long text = somewhat clear
+else clarityScore = 0;                               // Vague
+
+let issueData = {};
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Data Extraction (GitHub or Text)
+
+```javascript
+if (isGitHubUrl || isGitHubShort) {
+  // GitHub - fetch via gh CLI
+  const result = Bash(`gh issue view ${extractIssueRef(input)} --json number,title,body,labels,url`);
+  const gh = JSON.parse(result);
+  issueData = {
+    id: `GH-${gh.number}`,
+    title: gh.title,
+    source: 'github',
+    source_url: gh.url,
+    labels: gh.labels.map(l => l.name),
+    context: gh.body?.substring(0, 500) || gh.title,
+    ...parseMarkdownBody(gh.body)
+  };
+} else {
+  // Text description
+  issueData = {
+    id: `ISS-${new Date().toISOString().replace(/[-:T]/g, '').slice(0, 14)}`,
+    source: 'text',
+    ...parseTextDescription(input)
+  };
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Lightweight Context Hint (Conditional)
+
+```javascript
+// ACE search ONLY for medium clarity (1-2) AND missing components
+// Skip for: GitHub (has context), vague (needs clarification first)
+// Note: Deep exploration happens in /issue:plan, this is just a quick hint
+
+if (clarityScore >= 1 && clarityScore <= 2 && !issueData.affected_components?.length) {
+  const keywords = extractKeywords(issueData.context);
+
+  if (keywords.length >= 2) {
+    try {
+      const aceResult = mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+        project_root_path: process.cwd(),
+        query: keywords.slice(0, 3).join(' ')
+      });
+      issueData.affected_components = aceResult.files?.slice(0, 3) || [];
+    } catch {
+      // ACE failure is non-blocking
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Conditional Clarification (Only if Unclear)
+
+```javascript
+// ONLY ask questions if clarity is low - simple open-ended prompt
+if (clarityScore < 2 && (!issueData.context || issueData.context.length < 20)) {
+  const answer = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: 'Please describe the issue in more detail:',
+      header: 'Clarify',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'Provide details', description: 'Describe what, where, and expected behavior' }
+      ]
+    }]
+  });
+
+  // Use custom text input (via "Other")
+  if (answer.customText) {
+    issueData.context = answer.customText;
+    issueData.title = answer.customText.split(/[.\n]/)[0].substring(0, 60);
+    issueData.feedback = [{
+      type: 'clarification',
+      stage: 'new',
+      content: answer.customText,
+      created_at: new Date().toISOString()
+    }];
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 5: GitHub Publishing Decision (Non-GitHub Sources)
+
+```javascript
+// For non-GitHub sources, ask if user wants to publish to GitHub
+let publishToGitHub = false;
+
+if (issueData.source !== 'github') {
+  const publishAnswer = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: 'Would you like to publish this issue to GitHub?',
+      header: 'Publish',
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: 'Yes, publish to GitHub', description: 'Create issue on GitHub and link it' },
+        { label: 'No, keep local only', description: 'Store as local issue without GitHub sync' }
+      ]
+    }]
+  });
+
+  publishToGitHub = publishAnswer.answers?.['Publish']?.includes('Yes');
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Create Issue
+
+**Summary Display:**
+- Show ID, title, source, affected files (if any)
+
+**Confirmation** (only for vague inputs, clarityScore < 2):
+- Use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm before creation
+
+**Issue Creation** (via CLI endpoint):
+```bash
+# Option 1: Pipe input (recommended for complex JSON - avoids shell escaping)
+echo '{"title":"...", "context":"...", "priority":3}' | ccw issue create
+
+# Option 2: Heredoc (for multi-line JSON)
+ccw issue create << 'EOF'
+{"title":"...", "context":"含\"引号\"的内容", "priority":3}
+EOF
+
+# Option 3: --data parameter (simple cases only)
+ccw issue create --data '{"title":"...", "priority":3}'
+```
+
+**CLI Endpoint Features:**
+| Feature | Description |
+|---------|-------------|
+| Auto-increment ID | `ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN` (e.g., `ISS-20251229-001`) |
+| Trailing newline | Proper JSONL format, no corruption |
+| JSON output | Returns created issue with all fields |
+
+**Example:**
+```bash
+# Create issue via pipe (recommended)
+echo '{"title": "Login fails with special chars", "context": "500 error when password contains quotes", "priority": 2}' | ccw issue create
+
+# Or with heredoc for complex JSON
+ccw issue create << 'EOF'
+{
+  "title": "Login fails with special chars",
+  "context": "500 error when password contains \"quotes\"",
+  "priority": 2,
+  "source": "text",
+  "expected_behavior": "Login succeeds",
+  "actual_behavior": "500 Internal Server Error"
+}
+EOF
+
+# Output (JSON)
+{
+  "id": "ISS-20251229-001",
+  "title": "Login fails with special chars",
+  "status": "registered",
+  ...
+}
+```
+
+**GitHub Publishing** (if user opted in):
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Create local issue FIRST
+const localIssue = createLocalIssue(issueData);  // ccw issue create
+
+// Step 2: Publish to GitHub if requested
+if (publishToGitHub) {
+  const ghResult = Bash(`gh issue create --title "${issueData.title}" --body "${issueData.context}"`);
+  // Parse GitHub URL from output
+  const ghUrl = ghResult.match(/https:\/\/github\.com\/[\w-]+\/[\w-]+\/issues\/\d+/)?.[0];
+  const ghNumber = parseInt(ghUrl?.match(/\/issues\/(\d+)/)?.[1]);
+
+  if (ghNumber) {
+    // Step 3: Update local issue with GitHub binding
+    Bash(`ccw issue update ${localIssue.id} --github-url "${ghUrl}" --github-number ${ghNumber}`);
+    // Or via pipe:
+    // echo '{"github_url":"${ghUrl}","github_number":${ghNumber}}' | ccw issue update ${localIssue.id}
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Workflow:**
+```
+1. Create local issue (ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN) → stored in .workflow/issues.jsonl
+2. If publishToGitHub:
+   a. gh issue create → returns GitHub URL
+   b. Update local issue with github_url + github_number binding
+3. Both local and GitHub issues exist, linked together
+```
+
+**Example with GitHub Publishing:**
+```bash
+# User creates text issue
+/issue:new "Login fails with special chars. Expected: success. Actual: 500"
+
+# System asks: "Would you like to publish this issue to GitHub?"
+# User selects: "Yes, publish to GitHub"
+
+# Output:
+# ✓ Local issue created: ISS-20251229-001
+# ✓ Published to GitHub: https://github.com/org/repo/issues/123
+# ✓ GitHub binding saved to local issue
+# → Next step: /issue:plan ISS-20251229-001
+
+# Resulting issue JSON:
+{
+  "id": "ISS-20251229-001",
+  "title": "Login fails with special chars",
+  "source": "text",
+  "github_url": "https://github.com/org/repo/issues/123",
+  "github_number": 123,
+  ...
+}
+```
+
+**Completion:**
+- Display created issue ID
+- Show GitHub URL (if published)
+- Show next step: `/issue:plan <id>`
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Input Analysis
+   └─ Detect clarity score (GitHub URL? Structured text? Keywords?)
+
+Phase 2: Data Extraction (branched by clarity)
+   ┌────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────┐
+   │  Score 3   │   Score 1-2     │   Score 0    │
+   │  GitHub    │   Text + ACE    │   Vague      │
+   ├────────────┼─────────────────┼──────────────┤
+   │  gh CLI    │  Parse struct   │ AskQuestion  │
+   │  → parse   │  + quick hint   │ (1 question) │
+   │            │  (3 files max)  │  → feedback  │
+   └────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────┘
+
+Phase 3: GitHub Publishing Decision (non-GitHub only)
+   ├─ Source = github: Skip (already from GitHub)
+   └─ Source ≠ github: AskUserQuestion
+      ├─ Yes → publishToGitHub = true
+      └─ No  → publishToGitHub = false
+
+Phase 4: Create Issue
+   ├─ Score ≥ 2: Direct creation
+   └─ Score < 2: Confirm first → Create
+   └─ If publishToGitHub: gh issue create → link URL
+
+Note: Deep exploration & lifecycle deferred to /issue:plan
+```
+
+## Helper Functions
+
+```javascript
+function extractKeywords(text) {
+  const stopWords = new Set(['the', 'a', 'an', 'is', 'are', 'was', 'were', 'not', 'with']);
+  return text
+    .toLowerCase()
+    .split(/\W+/)
+    .filter(w => w.length > 3 && !stopWords.has(w))
+    .slice(0, 5);
+}
+
+function parseTextDescription(text) {
+  const result = { title: '', context: '' };
+  const sentences = text.split(/\.(?=\s|$)/);
+
+  result.title = sentences[0]?.trim().substring(0, 60) || 'Untitled';
+  result.context = text.substring(0, 500);
+
+  // Extract structured fields if present
+  const expected = text.match(/expected:?\s*([^.]+)/i);
+  const actual = text.match(/actual:?\s*([^.]+)/i);
+  const affects = text.match(/affects?:?\s*([^.]+)/i);
+
+  if (expected) result.expected_behavior = expected[1].trim();
+  if (actual) result.actual_behavior = actual[1].trim();
+  if (affects) {
+    result.affected_components = affects[1].split(/[,\s]+/).filter(c => c.includes('/') || c.includes('.'));
+  }
+
+  return result;
+}
+
+function parseMarkdownBody(body) {
+  if (!body) return {};
+  const result = {};
+
+  const problem = body.match(/##?\s*(problem|description)[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+  const expected = body.match(/##?\s*expected[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+  const actual = body.match(/##?\s*actual[:\s]*([\s\S]*?)(?=##|$)/i);
+
+  if (problem) result.context = problem[2].trim().substring(0, 500);
+  if (expected) result.expected_behavior = expected[2].trim();
+  if (actual) result.actual_behavior = actual[2].trim();
+
+  return result;
+}
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+### Clear Input (No Questions)
+
+```bash
+/issue:new https://github.com/org/repo/issues/42
+# → Fetches, parses, creates immediately
+
+/issue:new "Login fails with special chars. Expected: success. Actual: 500"
+# → Parses structure, creates immediately
+```
+
+### Vague Input (1 Question)
+
+```bash
+/issue:new "auth broken"
+# → Asks: "Input unclear. What is the issue about?"
+# → User provides details → saved to feedback[]
+# → Creates issue
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:plan` - Plan solution for issue
+

.claude/commands/issue/plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+---
+name: plan
+description: Batch plan issue resolution using issue-plan-agent (explore + plan closed-loop)
+argument-hint: "--all-pending <issue-id>[,<issue-id>,...] [--batch-size 3] "
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), SlashCommand(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Plan Command (/issue:plan)
+
+## Overview
+
+Unified planning command using **issue-plan-agent** that combines exploration and planning into a single closed-loop workflow.
+
+**Behavior:**
+- Single solution per issue → auto-bind
+- Multiple solutions → return for user selection
+- Agent handles file generation
+
+## Core Guidelines
+
+**⚠️ Data Access Principle**: Issues and solutions files can grow very large. To avoid context overflow:
+
+| Operation | Correct | Incorrect |
+|-----------|---------|-----------|
+| List issues (brief) | `ccw issue list --status pending --brief` | `Read('issues.jsonl')` |
+| Read issue details | `ccw issue status <id> --json` | `Read('issues.jsonl')` |
+| Update status | `ccw issue update <id> --status ...` | Direct file edit |
+| Bind solution | `ccw issue bind <id> <sol-id>` | Direct file edit |
+
+**Output Options**:
+- `--brief`: JSON with minimal fields (id, title, status, priority, tags)
+- `--json`: Full JSON (agent use only)
+
+**Orchestration vs Execution**:
+- **Command (orchestrator)**: Use `--brief` for minimal context
+- **Agent (executor)**: Fetch full details → `ccw issue status <id> --json`
+
+**ALWAYS** use CLI commands for CRUD operations. **NEVER** read entire `issues.jsonl` or `solutions/*.jsonl` directly. 
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/issue:plan [<issue-id>[,<issue-id>,...]] [FLAGS]
+
+# Examples
+/issue:plan                           # Default: --all-pending
+/issue:plan GH-123                    # Single issue
+/issue:plan GH-123,GH-124,GH-125      # Batch (up to 3)
+/issue:plan --all-pending             # All pending issues (explicit)
+
+# Flags
+--batch-size <n>      Max issues per agent batch (default: 3)
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Issue Loading
+   ├─ Parse input (single, comma-separated, or --all-pending)
+   ├─ Fetch issue metadata (ID, title, tags)
+   ├─ Validate issues exist (create if needed)
+   └─ Group by similarity (shared tags or title keywords, max 3 per batch)
+
+Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent)
+   ├─ Launch issue-plan-agent per batch
+   ├─ Agent performs:
+   │   ├─ ACE semantic search for each issue
+   │   ├─ Codebase exploration (files, patterns, dependencies)
+   │   ├─ Solution generation with task breakdown
+   │   └─ Conflict detection across issues
+   └─ Output: solution JSON per issue
+
+Phase 3: Solution Registration & Binding
+   ├─ Append solutions to solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
+   ├─ Single solution per issue → auto-bind
+   ├─ Multiple candidates → AskUserQuestion to select
+   └─ Update issues.jsonl with bound_solution_id
+
+Phase 4: Summary
+   ├─ Display bound solutions
+   ├─ Show task counts per issue
+   └─ Display next steps (/issue:queue)
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Issue Loading (Brief Info Only)
+
+```javascript
+const batchSize = flags.batchSize || 3;
+let issues = [];  // {id, title, tags} - brief info for grouping only
+
+// Default to --all-pending if no input provided
+const useAllPending = flags.allPending || !userInput || userInput.trim() === '';
+
+if (useAllPending) {
+  // Get pending issues with brief metadata via CLI
+  const result = Bash(`ccw issue list --status pending,registered --json`).trim();
+  const parsed = result ? JSON.parse(result) : [];
+  issues = parsed.map(i => ({ id: i.id, title: i.title || '', tags: i.tags || [] }));
+
+  if (issues.length === 0) {
+    console.log('No pending issues found.');
+    return;
+  }
+  console.log(`Found ${issues.length} pending issues`);
+} else {
+  // Parse comma-separated issue IDs, fetch brief metadata
+  const ids = userInput.includes(',')
+    ? userInput.split(',').map(s => s.trim())
+    : [userInput.trim()];
+
+  for (const id of ids) {
+    Bash(`ccw issue init ${id} --title "Issue ${id}" 2>/dev/null || true`);
+    const info = Bash(`ccw issue status ${id} --json`).trim();
+    const parsed = info ? JSON.parse(info) : {};
+    issues.push({ id, title: parsed.title || '', tags: parsed.tags || [] });
+  }
+}
+// Note: Agent fetches full issue content via `ccw issue status <id> --json`
+
+// Semantic grouping via Gemini CLI (max 4 issues per group)
+async function groupBySimilarityGemini(issues) {
+  const issueSummaries = issues.map(i => ({
+    id: i.id, title: i.title, tags: i.tags
+  }));
+
+  const prompt = `
+PURPOSE: Group similar issues by semantic similarity for batch processing; maximize within-group coherence; max 4 issues per group
+TASK: • Analyze issue titles/tags semantically • Identify functional/architectural clusters • Assign each issue to one group
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: Issue metadata only
+EXPECTED: JSON with groups array, each containing max 4 issue_ids, theme, rationale
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Each issue in exactly one group | Max 4 issues per group | Balance group sizes
+
+INPUT:
+${JSON.stringify(issueSummaries, null, 2)}
+
+OUTPUT FORMAT:
+{"groups":[{"group_id":1,"theme":"...","issue_ids":["..."],"rationale":"..."}],"ungrouped":[]}
+`;
+
+  const taskId = Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "${prompt}" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
+    run_in_background: true, timeout: 600000
+  });
+  const output = TaskOutput({ task_id: taskId, block: true });
+
+  // Extract JSON from potential markdown code blocks
+  function extractJsonFromMarkdown(text) {
+    const jsonMatch = text.match(/```json\s*\n([\s\S]*?)\n```/) ||
+                      text.match(/```\s*\n([\s\S]*?)\n```/);
+    return jsonMatch ? jsonMatch[1] : text;
+  }
+
+  const result = JSON.parse(extractJsonFromMarkdown(output));
+  return result.groups.map(g => g.issue_ids.map(id => issues.find(i => i.id === id)));
+}
+
+const batches = await groupBySimilarityGemini(issues);
+console.log(`Processing ${issues.length} issues in ${batches.length} batch(es) (max 4 issues/agent)`);
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: batches.map((_, i) => ({
+    content: `Plan batch ${i+1}`,
+    status: 'pending',
+    activeForm: `Planning batch ${i+1}`
+  }))
+});
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent) - PARALLEL
+
+```javascript
+Bash(`mkdir -p .workflow/issues/solutions`);
+const pendingSelections = [];  // Collect multi-solution issues for user selection
+const agentResults = [];       // Collect all agent results for conflict aggregation
+
+// Build prompts for all batches
+const agentTasks = batches.map((batch, batchIndex) => {
+  const issueList = batch.map(i => `- ${i.id}: ${i.title}${i.tags.length ? ` [${i.tags.join(', ')}]` : ''}`).join('\n');
+  const batchIds = batch.map(i => i.id);
+
+  const issuePrompt = `
+## Plan Issues
+
+**Issues** (grouped by similarity):
+${issueList}
+
+**Project Root**: ${process.cwd()}
+
+### Project Context (MANDATORY)
+1. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack, architecture)
+2. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (constraints and conventions)
+
+### Workflow
+1. Fetch issue details: ccw issue status <id> --json
+2. Load project context files
+3. Explore codebase (ACE semantic search)
+4. Plan solution with tasks (schema: solution-schema.json)
+5. **If github_url exists**: Add final task to comment on GitHub issue
+6. Write solution to: .workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl
+7. Single solution → auto-bind; Multiple → return for selection
+
+### Rules
+- Solution ID format: SOL-{issue-id}-{uid} (uid: 4 random alphanumeric chars, e.g., a7x9)
+- Single solution per issue → auto-bind via ccw issue bind
+- Multiple solutions → register only, return pending_selection
+- Tasks must have quantified acceptance.criteria
+
+### Return Summary
+{"bound":[{"issue_id":"...","solution_id":"...","task_count":N}],"pending_selection":[{"issue_id":"...","solutions":[{"id":"...","description":"...","task_count":N}]}]}
+`;
+
+  return { batchIndex, batchIds, issuePrompt, batch };
+});
+
+// Launch agents in parallel (max 10 concurrent)
+const MAX_PARALLEL = 10;
+for (let i = 0; i < agentTasks.length; i += MAX_PARALLEL) {
+  const chunk = agentTasks.slice(i, i + MAX_PARALLEL);
+  const taskIds = [];
+
+  // Launch chunk in parallel
+  for (const { batchIndex, batchIds, issuePrompt, batch } of chunk) {
+    updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'in_progress');
+    const taskId = Task(
+      subagent_type="issue-plan-agent",
+      run_in_background=true,
+      description=`Explore & plan ${batch.length} issues: ${batchIds.join(', ')}`,
+      prompt=issuePrompt
+    );
+    taskIds.push({ taskId, batchIndex });
+  }
+
+  console.log(`Launched ${taskIds.length} agents (batch ${i/MAX_PARALLEL + 1}/${Math.ceil(agentTasks.length/MAX_PARALLEL)})...`);
+
+  // Collect results from this chunk
+  for (const { taskId, batchIndex } of taskIds) {
+    const result = TaskOutput(task_id=taskId, block=true);
+
+    // Extract JSON from potential markdown code blocks (agent may wrap in ```json...```)
+    const jsonText = extractJsonFromMarkdown(result);
+    let summary;
+    try {
+      summary = JSON.parse(jsonText);
+    } catch (e) {
+      console.log(`⚠ Batch ${batchIndex + 1}: Failed to parse agent result, skipping`);
+      updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'completed');
+      continue;
+    }
+    agentResults.push(summary);  // Store for Phase 3 conflict aggregation
+
+    for (const item of summary.bound || []) {
+      console.log(`✓ ${item.issue_id}: ${item.solution_id} (${item.task_count} tasks)`);
+    }
+    // Collect and notify pending selections
+    for (const pending of summary.pending_selection || []) {
+      console.log(`⏳ ${pending.issue_id}: ${pending.solutions.length} solutions → awaiting selection`);
+      pendingSelections.push(pending);
+    }
+    if (summary.conflicts?.length > 0) {
+      console.log(`⚠ Conflicts: ${summary.conflicts.length} detected (will resolve in Phase 3)`);
+    }
+    updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'completed');
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Conflict Resolution & Solution Selection
+
+**Conflict Handling:**
+- Collect `conflicts` from all agent results
+- Low/Medium severity → auto-resolve with `recommended_resolution`
+- High severity → use `AskUserQuestion` to let user choose resolution
+
+**Multi-Solution Selection:**
+- If `pending_selection` contains issues with multiple solutions:
+  - Use `AskUserQuestion` to present options (solution ID + task count + description)
+  - Extract selected solution ID from user response
+  - Verify solution file exists, recover from payload if missing
+  - Bind selected solution via `ccw issue bind <issue-id> <solution-id>`
+
+### Phase 4: Summary
+
+```javascript
+// Count planned issues via CLI
+const planned = JSON.parse(Bash(`ccw issue list --status planned --brief`) || '[]');
+const plannedCount = planned.length;
+
+console.log(`
+## Done: ${issues.length} issues → ${plannedCount} planned
+
+Next: \`/issue:queue\` → \`/issue:execute\`
+`);
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Issue not found | Auto-create in issues.jsonl |
+| ACE search fails | Agent falls back to ripgrep |
+| No solutions generated | Display error, suggest manual planning |
+| User cancels selection | Skip issue, continue with others |
+| File conflicts | Agent detects and suggests resolution order |
+
+## Bash Compatibility
+
+**Avoid**: `$(cmd)`, `$var`, `for` loops — will be escaped incorrectly
+
+**Use**: Simple commands + `&&` chains, quote comma params `"pending,registered"`
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before completing, verify:
+
+- [ ] All input issues have solutions in `solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl`
+- [ ] Single solution issues are auto-bound (`bound_solution_id` set)
+- [ ] Multi-solution issues returned in `pending_selection` for user choice
+- [ ] Each solution has executable tasks with `modification_points`
+- [ ] Task acceptance criteria are quantified (not vague)
+- [ ] Conflicts detected and reported (if multiple issues touch same files)
+- [ ] Issue status updated to `planned` after binding
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue from bound solutions
+- `ccw issue list` - List all issues
+- `ccw issue status` - View issue and solution details

.claude/commands/issue/queue.md

@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+---
+name: queue
+description: Form execution queue from bound solutions using issue-queue-agent (solution-level)
+argument-hint: "[--queues <n>] [--issue <id>]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Issue Queue Command (/issue:queue)
+
+## Overview
+
+Queue formation command using **issue-queue-agent** that analyzes all bound solutions, resolves **inter-solution** conflicts, and creates an ordered execution queue at **solution level**.
+
+**Design Principle**: Queue items are **solutions**, not individual tasks. Each executor receives a complete solution with all its tasks.
+
+## Core Capabilities
+
+- **Agent-driven**: issue-queue-agent handles all ordering logic
+- **Solution-level granularity**: Queue items are solutions, not tasks
+- **Conflict clarification**: High-severity conflicts prompt user decision
+- Semantic priority calculation per solution (0.0-1.0)
+- Parallel/Sequential group assignment for solutions
+
+## Core Guidelines
+
+**⚠️ Data Access Principle**: Issues and queue files can grow very large. To avoid context overflow:
+
+| Operation | Correct | Incorrect |
+|-----------|---------|-----------|
+| List issues (brief) | `ccw issue list --status planned --brief` | `Read('issues.jsonl')` |
+| List queue (brief) | `ccw issue queue --brief` | `Read('queues/*.json')` |
+| Read issue details | `ccw issue status <id> --json` | `Read('issues.jsonl')` |
+| Get next item | `ccw issue next --json` | `Read('queues/*.json')` |
+| Update status | `ccw issue update <id> --status ...` | Direct file edit |
+| Sync from queue | `ccw issue update --from-queue` | Direct file edit |
+| **Read solution (brief)** | `ccw issue solution <id> --brief` | `Read('solutions/*.jsonl')` |
+
+**Output Options**:
+- `--brief`: JSON with minimal fields (id, status, counts)
+- `--json`: Full JSON (agent use only)
+
+**Orchestration vs Execution**:
+- **Command (orchestrator)**: Use `--brief` for minimal context
+- **Agent (executor)**: Fetch full details → `ccw issue status <id> --json`
+
+**ALWAYS** use CLI commands for CRUD operations. **NEVER** read entire `issues.jsonl` or `queues/*.json` directly.
+
+
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/issue:queue [FLAGS]
+
+# Examples
+/issue:queue                      # Form NEW queue from all bound solutions
+/issue:queue --queues 3           # Form 3 parallel queues (solutions distributed)
+/issue:queue --issue GH-123       # Form queue for specific issue only
+/issue:queue --append GH-124      # Append to active queue
+/issue:queue --list               # List all queues (history)
+/issue:queue --switch QUE-xxx     # Switch active queue
+/issue:queue --archive            # Archive completed active queue
+
+# Flags
+--queues <n>          Number of parallel queues (default: 1)
+--issue <id>          Form queue for specific issue only
+--append <id>         Append issue to active queue (don't create new)
+
+# CLI subcommands (ccw issue queue ...)
+ccw issue queue list                  List all queues with status
+ccw issue queue switch <queue-id>     Switch active queue
+ccw issue queue archive               Archive current queue
+ccw issue queue delete <queue-id>     Delete queue from history
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Solution Loading & Distribution
+   ├─ Load issues.jsonl, filter by status='planned' + bound_solution_id
+   ├─ Read solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl, find bound solution
+   ├─ Extract files_touched from task modification_points
+   ├─ Build solution objects array
+   └─ If --queues > 1: Partition solutions into N groups (minimize cross-group file conflicts)
+
+Phase 2-4: Agent-Driven Queue Formation (issue-queue-agent)
+   ├─ Generate N queue IDs (QUE-xxx-1, QUE-xxx-2, ...)
+   ├─ If --queues == 1: Launch single issue-queue-agent
+   ├─ If --queues > 1: Launch N issue-queue-agents IN PARALLEL
+   ├─ Each agent performs:
+   │   ├─ Conflict analysis (5 types via Gemini CLI)
+   │   ├─ Build dependency DAG from conflicts
+   │   ├─ Calculate semantic priority per solution
+   │   └─ Assign execution groups (parallel/sequential)
+   └─ Each agent writes: queue JSON + index update
+
+Phase 5: Conflict Clarification (if needed)
+   ├─ Collect `clarifications` arrays from all agents
+   ├─ If clarifications exist → AskUserQuestion (batched)
+   ├─ Pass user decisions back to respective agents (resume)
+   └─ Agents update queues with resolved conflicts
+
+Phase 6: Status Update & Summary
+   ├─ Update issue statuses to 'queued'
+   └─ Display queue summary (N queues), next step: /issue:execute
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Solution Loading & Distribution
+
+**Data Loading:**
+- Use `ccw issue list --status planned --brief` to get planned issues with `bound_solution_id`
+- If no planned issues found → display message, suggest `/issue:plan`
+
+**Solution Brief Loading** (for each planned issue):
+```bash
+ccw issue solution <issue-id> --brief
+# Returns: [{ solution_id, is_bound, task_count, files_touched[] }]
+```
+
+**Build Solution Objects:**
+```json
+{
+  "issue_id": "ISS-xxx",
+  "solution_id": "SOL-ISS-xxx-1",
+  "task_count": 3,
+  "files_touched": ["src/auth.ts", "src/utils.ts"],
+  "priority": "medium"
+}
+```
+
+**Multi-Queue Distribution** (if `--queues > 1`):
+- Use `files_touched` from brief output for partitioning
+- Group solutions with overlapping files into same queue
+
+**Output:** Array of solution objects (or N arrays if multi-queue)
+
+### Phase 2-4: Agent-Driven Queue Formation
+
+**Generate Queue IDs** (command layer, pass to agent):
+```javascript
+const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[-:T]/g, '').slice(0, 14);
+const numQueues = args.queues || 1;
+const queueIds = numQueues === 1
+  ? [`QUE-${timestamp}`]
+  : Array.from({length: numQueues}, (_, i) => `QUE-${timestamp}-${i + 1}`);
+```
+
+**Agent Prompt** (same for each queue, with assigned solutions):
+```
+## Order Solutions into Execution Queue
+
+**Queue ID**: ${queueId}
+**Solutions**: ${solutions.length} from ${issues.length} issues
+**Project Root**: ${cwd}
+**Queue Index**: ${queueIndex} of ${numQueues}
+
+### Input
+${JSON.stringify(solutions)}
+// Each object: { issue_id, solution_id, task_count, files_touched[], priority }
+
+### Workflow
+
+Step 1: Build dependency graph from solutions (nodes=solutions, edges=file conflicts via files_touched)
+Step 2: Use Gemini CLI for conflict analysis (5 types: file, API, data, dependency, architecture)
+Step 3: For high-severity conflicts without clear resolution → add to `clarifications`
+Step 4: Calculate semantic priority (base from issue priority + task_count boost)
+Step 5: Assign execution groups: P* (parallel, no overlaps) / S* (sequential, shared files)
+Step 6: Write queue JSON + update index
+
+### Output Requirements
+
+**Write files** (exactly 2):
+- `.workflow/issues/queues/${queueId}.json` - Full queue with solutions, conflicts, groups
+- `.workflow/issues/queues/index.json` - Update with new queue entry
+
+**Return JSON**:
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "queue_id": "${queueId}",
+  "total_solutions": N,
+  "total_tasks": N,
+  "execution_groups": [{"id": "P1", "type": "parallel", "count": N}],
+  "issues_queued": ["ISS-xxx"],
+  "clarifications": [{"conflict_id": "CFT-1", "question": "...", "options": [...]}]
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+### Rules
+- Solution granularity (NOT individual tasks)
+- Queue Item ID format: S-1, S-2, S-3, ...
+- Use provided Queue ID (do NOT generate new)
+- `clarifications` only present if high-severity unresolved conflicts exist
+- Use `files_touched` from input (already extracted by orchestrator)
+
+### Done Criteria
+- [ ] Queue JSON written with all solutions ordered
+- [ ] Index updated with active_queue_id
+- [ ] No circular dependencies
+- [ ] Parallel groups have no file overlaps
+- [ ] Return JSON matches required shape
+```
+
+**Launch Agents** (parallel if multi-queue):
+```javascript
+const numQueues = args.queues || 1;
+
+if (numQueues === 1) {
+  // Single queue: single agent call
+  const result = Task(
+    subagent_type="issue-queue-agent",
+    prompt=buildPrompt(queueIds[0], solutions),
+    description=`Order ${solutions.length} solutions`
+  );
+} else {
+  // Multi-queue: parallel agent calls (single message with N Task calls)
+  const agentPromises = solutionGroups.map((group, i) =>
+    Task(
+      subagent_type="issue-queue-agent",
+      prompt=buildPrompt(queueIds[i], group, i + 1, numQueues),
+      description=`Queue ${i + 1}/${numQueues}: ${group.length} solutions`
+    )
+  );
+  // All agents launched in parallel via single message with multiple Task tool calls
+}
+```
+
+**Multi-Queue Index Update:**
+- First queue sets `active_queue_id`
+- All queues added to `queues` array with `queue_group` field linking them
+
+### Phase 5: Conflict Clarification
+
+**Collect Agent Results** (multi-queue):
+```javascript
+// Collect clarifications from all agents
+const allClarifications = results.flatMap((r, i) =>
+  (r.clarifications || []).map(c => ({ ...c, queue_id: queueIds[i], agent_id: agentIds[i] }))
+);
+```
+
+**Check Agent Return:**
+- Parse agent result JSON (or all results if multi-queue)
+- If any `clarifications` array exists and non-empty → user decision required
+
+**Clarification Flow:**
+```javascript
+if (allClarifications.length > 0) {
+  for (const clarification of allClarifications) {
+    // Present to user via AskUserQuestion
+    const answer = AskUserQuestion({
+      questions: [{
+        question: `[${clarification.queue_id}] ${clarification.question}`,
+        header: clarification.conflict_id,
+        options: clarification.options,
+        multiSelect: false
+      }]
+    });
+
+    // Resume respective agent with user decision
+    Task(
+      subagent_type="issue-queue-agent",
+      resume=clarification.agent_id,
+      prompt=`Conflict ${clarification.conflict_id} resolved: ${answer.selected}`
+    );
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Status Update & Summary
+
+**Status Update** (MUST use CLI command, NOT direct file operations):
+
+```bash
+# Option 1: Batch update from queue (recommended)
+ccw issue update --from-queue [queue-id] --json
+ccw issue update --from-queue --json              # Use active queue
+ccw issue update --from-queue QUE-xxx --json      # Use specific queue
+
+# Option 2: Individual issue update
+ccw issue update <issue-id> --status queued
+```
+
+**⚠️ IMPORTANT**: Do NOT directly modify `issues.jsonl`. Always use CLI command to ensure proper validation and history tracking.
+
+**Output** (JSON):
+```json
+{
+  "success": true,
+  "queue_id": "QUE-xxx",
+  "queued": ["ISS-001", "ISS-002"],
+  "queued_count": 2,
+  "unplanned": ["ISS-003"],
+  "unplanned_count": 1
+}
+```
+
+**Behavior:**
+- Updates issues in queue to `status: 'queued'` (skips already queued/executing/completed)
+- Identifies planned issues with `bound_solution_id` NOT in queue → `unplanned` array
+- Optional `queue-id`: defaults to active queue if omitted
+
+**Summary Output:**
+- Display queue ID, solution count, task count
+- Show unplanned issues (planned but NOT in queue)
+- Show next step: `/issue:execute`
+
+
+## Storage Structure (Queue History)
+
+```
+.workflow/issues/
+├── issues.jsonl              # All issues (one per line)
+├── queues/                   # Queue history directory
+│   ├── index.json            # Queue index (active + history)
+│   ├── {queue-id}.json       # Individual queue files
+│   └── ...
+└── solutions/
+    ├── {issue-id}.jsonl      # Solutions for issue
+    └── ...
+```
+
+### Queue Index Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "active_queue_id": "QUE-20251227-143000",
+  "active_queue_group": "QGR-20251227-143000",
+  "queues": [
+    {
+      "id": "QUE-20251227-143000-1",
+      "queue_group": "QGR-20251227-143000",
+      "queue_index": 1,
+      "total_queues": 3,
+      "status": "active",
+      "issue_ids": ["ISS-xxx", "ISS-yyy"],
+      "total_solutions": 3,
+      "completed_solutions": 1,
+      "created_at": "2025-12-27T14:30:00Z"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Multi-Queue Fields:**
+- `queue_group`: Links queues created in same batch (format: `QGR-{timestamp}`)
+- `queue_index`: Position in group (1-based)
+- `total_queues`: Total queues in group
+- `active_queue_group`: Current active group (for multi-queue execution)
+
+**Note**: Queue file schema is produced by `issue-queue-agent`. See agent documentation for details.
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| No bound solutions | Display message, suggest /issue:plan |
+| Circular dependency | List cycles, abort queue formation |
+| High-severity conflict | Return `clarifications`, prompt user decision |
+| User cancels clarification | Abort queue formation |
+| **index.json not updated** | Auto-fix: Set active_queue_id to new queue |
+| **Queue file missing solutions** | Abort with error, agent must regenerate |
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before completing, verify:
+
+- [ ] All planned issues with `bound_solution_id` are included
+- [ ] Queue JSON written to `queues/{queue-id}.json` (N files if multi-queue)
+- [ ] Index updated in `queues/index.json` with `active_queue_id`
+- [ ] Multi-queue: All queues share same `queue_group`
+- [ ] No circular dependencies in solution DAG
+- [ ] All conflicts resolved (auto or via user clarification)
+- [ ] Parallel groups have no file overlaps
+- [ ] Cross-queue: No file overlaps between queues
+- [ ] Issue statuses updated to `queued`
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/issue:execute` - Execute queue with codex
+- `ccw issue queue list` - View current queue
+- `ccw issue update --from-queue [queue-id]` - Sync issue statuses from queue

.claude/commands/memory/code-map-memory.md

@@ -143,68 +143,10 @@ Perform Deep Scan analysis for feature: {FEATURE_KEYWORD}
 - File Discovery: MCP Code Index (preferred) + rg fallback
 - Target: 5-15 most relevant files
 
-**Expected Output Format**:
-Return comprehensive analysis as structured JSON:
-{
-  \"feature\": \"{FEATURE_KEYWORD}\",
-  \"analysis_metadata\": {
-    \"tool_used\": \"gemini|qwen\",
-    \"timestamp\": \"ISO_TIMESTAMP\",
-    \"analysis_mode\": \"deep-scan\"
-  },
-  \"files_analyzed\": [
-    {\"file\": \"path/to/file.ts\", \"relevance\": \"high|medium|low\", \"role\": \"brief description\"}
-  ],
-  \"architecture\": {
-    \"overview\": \"High-level description\",
-    \"modules\": [
-      {\"name\": \"ModuleName\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"responsibility\": \"description\", \"dependencies\": [...]}
-    ],
-    \"interactions\": [
-      {\"from\": \"ModuleA\", \"to\": \"ModuleB\", \"type\": \"import|call|data-flow\", \"description\": \"...\"}
-    ],
-    \"entry_points\": [
-      {\"function\": \"main\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"description\": \"...\"}
-    ]
-  },
-  \"function_calls\": {
-    \"call_chains\": [
-      {
-        \"chain_id\": 1,
-        \"description\": \"User authentication flow\",
-        \"sequence\": [
-          {\"function\": \"login\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"calls\": [\"validateCredentials\", \"createSession\"]}
-        ]
-      }
-    ],
-    \"sequences\": [
-      {\"from\": \"Client\", \"to\": \"AuthService\", \"method\": \"login(username, password)\", \"returns\": \"Session\"}
-    ]
-  },
-  \"data_flow\": {
-    \"structures\": [
-      {\"name\": \"UserData\", \"stage\": \"input\", \"shape\": {\"username\": \"string\", \"password\": \"string\"}}
-    ],
-    \"transformations\": [
-      {\"from\": \"RawInput\", \"to\": \"ValidatedData\", \"transformer\": \"validateUser\", \"file\": \"file:line\"}
-    ]
-  },
-  \"conditional_logic\": {
-    \"branches\": [
-      {\"condition\": \"isAuthenticated\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"true_path\": \"...\", \"false_path\": \"...\"}
-    ],
-    \"error_handling\": [
-      {\"error_type\": \"AuthenticationError\", \"handler\": \"handleAuthError\", \"file\": \"file:line\", \"recovery\": \"retry|fail\"}
-    ]
-  },
-  \"design_patterns\": [
-    {\"pattern\": \"Repository Pattern\", \"location\": \"src/repositories\", \"description\": \"...\"}
-  ],
-  \"recommendations\": [
-    \"Consider extracting authentication logic into separate module\",
-    \"Add error recovery for network failures\"
-  ]
-}
+**MANDATORY FIRST STEP**:
+Read: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/codemap-json-schema.json
+
+**Output**: Return JSON following schema exactly. NO FILE WRITING - return JSON analysis only.
 
 **Critical Requirements**:
 - Use Deep Scan mode: Bash (Phase 1 - precise locations) + Gemini CLI (Phase 2 - semantic understanding) + Synthesis (Phase 3 - merge with attribution)
@@ -728,18 +670,6 @@ User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (detect existing) → Phase 3 (update index)
 
 ---
 
-## Benefits
-
-- **Per-Feature SKILL**: Independent packages for each analyzed feature
-- **Specialized Agent**: cli-explore-agent with Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source)
-- **Professional Analysis**: Pre-defined workflow for code exploration and structure analysis
-- **Clear Separation**: Agent analyzes (JSON) → Orchestrator documents (Mermaid markdown)
-- **Multi-Level Detail**: 4 levels (architecture → function → data → conditional)
-- **Visual Flow**: Embedded Mermaid diagrams for all flow types
-- **Progressive Loading**: Token-efficient context loading (2K → 30K)
-- **Auto-Continue**: Fully autonomous 3-phase execution
-- **Smart Skip**: Detects existing codemap, 10x faster index updates
-- **CLI Integration**: Gemini/Qwen for deep semantic understanding
 
 ## Architecture
 
@@ -753,12 +683,5 @@ code-map-memory (orchestrator)
   │       └─ Transform JSON → 5 Mermaid markdown files + metadata.json
   └─ Phase 3: Write SKILL.md (index generation, always runs)
 
-Benefits:
-✅ Specialized agent: cli-explore-agent with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini)
-✅ Professional analysis: Pre-defined Deep Scan workflow
-✅ Clear separation: Agent analyzes (JSON) → Orchestrator documents (Mermaid)
-✅ Smart skip logic: 10x faster when codemap exists
-✅ Multi-level detail: Architecture → Functions → Data → Conditionals
-
 Output: .claude/skills/codemap-{feature}/
 ```

.claude/commands/memory/compact.md

@@ -0,0 +1,383 @@
+---
+name: compact
+description: Compact current session memory into structured text for session recovery, extracting objective/plan/files/decisions/constraints/state, and save via MCP core_memory tool
+argument-hint: "[optional: session description]"
+allowed-tools: mcp__ccw-tools__core_memory(*), Read(*)
+examples:
+  - /memory:compact
+  - /memory:compact "completed core-memory module"
+---
+
+# Memory Compact Command (/memory:compact)
+
+## 1. Overview
+
+The `memory:compact` command **compresses current session working memory** into structured text optimized for **session recovery**, extracts critical information, and saves it to persistent storage via MCP `core_memory` tool.
+
+**Core Philosophy**:
+- **Session Recovery First**: Capture everything needed to resume work seamlessly
+- **Minimize Re-exploration**: Include file paths, decisions, and state to avoid redundant analysis
+- **Preserve Train of Thought**: Keep notes and hypotheses for complex debugging
+- **Actionable State**: Record last action result and known issues
+
+## 2. Parameters
+
+- `"session description"` (Optional): Session description to supplement objective
+  - Example: "completed core-memory module"
+  - Example: "debugging JWT refresh - suspected memory leak"
+
+## 3. Structured Output Format
+
+```markdown
+## Session ID
+[WFS-ID if workflow session active, otherwise (none)]
+
+## Project Root
+[Absolute path to project root, e.g., D:\Claude_dms3]
+
+## Objective
+[High-level goal - the "North Star" of this session]
+
+## Execution Plan
+[CRITICAL: Embed the LATEST plan in its COMPLETE and DETAILED form]
+
+### Source: [workflow | todo | user-stated | inferred]
+
+<details>
+<summary>Full Execution Plan (Click to expand)</summary>
+
+[PRESERVE COMPLETE PLAN VERBATIM - DO NOT SUMMARIZE]
+- ALL phases, tasks, subtasks
+- ALL file paths (absolute)
+- ALL dependencies and prerequisites
+- ALL acceptance criteria
+- ALL status markers ([x] done, [ ] pending)
+- ALL notes and context
+
+Example:
+## Phase 1: Setup
+- [x] Initialize project structure
+  - Created D:\Claude_dms3\src\core\index.ts
+  - Added dependencies: lodash, zod
+- [ ] Configure TypeScript
+  - Update tsconfig.json for strict mode
+
+## Phase 2: Implementation
+- [ ] Implement core API
+  - Target: D:\Claude_dms3\src\api\handler.ts
+  - Dependencies: Phase 1 complete
+  - Acceptance: All tests pass
+
+</details>
+
+## Working Files (Modified)
+[Absolute paths to actively modified files]
+- D:\Claude_dms3\src\file1.ts (role: main implementation)
+- D:\Claude_dms3\tests\file1.test.ts (role: unit tests)
+
+## Reference Files (Read-Only)
+[Absolute paths to context files - NOT modified but essential for understanding]
+- D:\Claude_dms3\.claude\CLAUDE.md (role: project instructions)
+- D:\Claude_dms3\src\types\index.ts (role: type definitions)
+- D:\Claude_dms3\package.json (role: dependencies)
+
+## Last Action
+[Last significant action and its result/status]
+
+## Decisions
+- [Decision]: [Reasoning]
+- [Decision]: [Reasoning]
+
+## Constraints
+- [User-specified limitation or preference]
+
+## Dependencies
+- [Added/changed packages or environment requirements]
+
+## Known Issues
+- [Deferred bug or edge case]
+
+## Changes Made
+- [Completed modification]
+
+## Pending
+- [Next step] or (none)
+
+## Notes
+[Unstructured thoughts, hypotheses, debugging trails]
+```
+
+## 4. Field Definitions
+
+| Field | Purpose | Recovery Value |
+|-------|---------|----------------|
+| **Session ID** | Workflow session identifier (WFS-*) | Links memory to specific stateful task execution |
+| **Project Root** | Absolute path to project directory | Enables correct path resolution in new sessions |
+| **Objective** | Ultimate goal of the session | Prevents losing track of broader feature |
+| **Execution Plan** | Complete plan from any source (verbatim) | Preserves full planning context, avoids re-planning |
+| **Working Files** | Actively modified files (absolute paths) | Immediately identifies where work was happening |
+| **Reference Files** | Read-only context files (absolute paths) | Eliminates re-exploration for critical context |
+| **Last Action** | Final tool output/status | Immediate state awareness (success/failure) |
+| **Decisions** | Architectural choices + reasoning | Prevents re-litigating settled decisions |
+| **Constraints** | User-imposed limitations | Maintains personalized coding style |
+| **Dependencies** | Package/environment changes | Prevents missing dependency errors |
+| **Known Issues** | Deferred bugs/edge cases | Ensures issues aren't forgotten |
+| **Changes Made** | Completed modifications | Clear record of what was done |
+| **Pending** | Next steps | Immediate action items |
+| **Notes** | Hypotheses, debugging trails | Preserves "train of thought" |
+
+## 5. Execution Flow
+
+### Step 1: Analyze Current Session
+
+Extract the following from conversation history:
+
+```javascript
+const sessionAnalysis = {
+  sessionId: "",       // WFS-* if workflow session active, null otherwise
+  projectRoot: "",     // Absolute path: D:\Claude_dms3
+  objective: "",       // High-level goal (1-2 sentences)
+  executionPlan: {
+    source: "workflow" | "todo" | "user-stated" | "inferred",
+    content: ""        // Full plan content - ALWAYS preserve COMPLETE and DETAILED form
+  },
+  workingFiles: [],    // {absolutePath, role} - modified files
+  referenceFiles: [],  // {absolutePath, role} - read-only context files
+  lastAction: "",      // Last significant action + result
+  decisions: [],       // {decision, reasoning}
+  constraints: [],     // User-specified limitations
+  dependencies: [],    // Added/changed packages
+  knownIssues: [],     // Deferred bugs
+  changesMade: [],     // Completed modifications
+  pending: [],         // Next steps
+  notes: ""            // Unstructured thoughts
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2: Generate Structured Text
+
+```javascript
+// Helper: Generate execution plan section
+const generateExecutionPlan = (plan) => {
+  const sourceLabels = {
+    'workflow': 'workflow (IMPL_PLAN.md)',
+    'todo': 'todo (TodoWrite)',
+    'user-stated': 'user-stated',
+    'inferred': 'inferred'
+  };
+
+  // CRITICAL: Preserve complete plan content verbatim - DO NOT summarize
+  return `### Source: ${sourceLabels[plan.source] || plan.source}
+
+<details>
+<summary>Full Execution Plan (Click to expand)</summary>
+
+${plan.content}
+
+</details>`;
+};
+
+const structuredText = `## Session ID
+${sessionAnalysis.sessionId || '(none)'}
+
+## Project Root
+${sessionAnalysis.projectRoot}
+
+## Objective
+${sessionAnalysis.objective}
+
+## Execution Plan
+${generateExecutionPlan(sessionAnalysis.executionPlan)}
+
+## Working Files (Modified)
+${sessionAnalysis.workingFiles.map(f => `- ${f.absolutePath} (role: ${f.role})`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Reference Files (Read-Only)
+${sessionAnalysis.referenceFiles.map(f => `- ${f.absolutePath} (role: ${f.role})`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Last Action
+${sessionAnalysis.lastAction}
+
+## Decisions
+${sessionAnalysis.decisions.map(d => `- ${d.decision}: ${d.reasoning}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Constraints
+${sessionAnalysis.constraints.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Dependencies
+${sessionAnalysis.dependencies.map(d => `- ${d}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Known Issues
+${sessionAnalysis.knownIssues.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Changes Made
+${sessionAnalysis.changesMade.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n') || '(none)'}
+
+## Pending
+${sessionAnalysis.pending.length > 0
+  ? sessionAnalysis.pending.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n')
+  : '(none)'}
+
+## Notes
+${sessionAnalysis.notes || '(none)'}`
+```
+
+### Step 3: Import to Core Memory via MCP
+
+Use the MCP `core_memory` tool to save the structured text:
+
+```javascript
+mcp__ccw-tools__core_memory({
+  operation: "import",
+  text: structuredText
+})
+```
+
+Or via CLI (pipe structured text to import):
+
+```bash
+# Write structured text to temp file, then import
+echo "$structuredText" | ccw core-memory import
+
+# Or from a file
+ccw core-memory import --file /path/to/session-memory.md
+```
+
+**Response Format**:
+```json
+{
+  "operation": "import",
+  "id": "CMEM-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS",
+  "message": "Created memory: CMEM-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS"
+}
+```
+
+### Step 4: Report Recovery ID
+
+After successful import, **clearly display the Recovery ID** to the user:
+
+```
+╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
+║  ✓ Session Memory Saved                                                    ║
+║                                                                            ║
+║  Recovery ID: CMEM-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS                                         ║
+║                                                                            ║
+║  To restore: "Please import memory <ID>"                                   ║
+║  (MCP: core_memory export | CLI: ccw core-memory export --id <ID>)         ║
+╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
+```
+
+## 6. Quality Checklist
+
+Before generating:
+- [ ] Session ID captured if workflow session active (WFS-*)
+- [ ] Project Root is absolute path (e.g., D:\Claude_dms3)
+- [ ] Objective clearly states the "North Star" goal
+- [ ] Execution Plan: COMPLETE plan preserved VERBATIM (no summarization)
+- [ ] Plan Source: Clearly identified (workflow | todo | user-stated | inferred)
+- [ ] Plan Details: ALL phases, tasks, file paths, dependencies, status markers included
+- [ ] All file paths are ABSOLUTE (not relative)
+- [ ] Working Files: 3-8 modified files with roles
+- [ ] Reference Files: Key context files (CLAUDE.md, types, configs)
+- [ ] Last Action captures final state (success/failure)
+- [ ] Decisions include reasoning, not just choices
+- [ ] Known Issues separates deferred from forgotten bugs
+- [ ] Notes preserve debugging hypotheses if any
+
+## 7. Path Resolution Rules
+
+### Project Root Detection
+1. Check current working directory from environment
+2. Look for project markers: `.git/`, `package.json`, `.claude/`
+3. Use the topmost directory containing these markers
+
+### Absolute Path Conversion
+```javascript
+// Convert relative to absolute
+const toAbsolutePath = (relativePath, projectRoot) => {
+  if (path.isAbsolute(relativePath)) return relativePath;
+  return path.join(projectRoot, relativePath);
+};
+
+// Example: "src/api/auth.ts" → "D:\Claude_dms3\src\api\auth.ts"
+```
+
+### Reference File Categories
+| Category | Examples | Priority |
+|----------|----------|----------|
+| Project Config | `.claude/CLAUDE.md`, `package.json`, `tsconfig.json` | High |
+| Type Definitions | `src/types/*.ts`, `*.d.ts` | High |
+| Related Modules | Parent/sibling modules with shared interfaces | Medium |
+| Test Files | Corresponding test files for modified code | Medium |
+| Documentation | `README.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md` | Low |
+
+## 8. Plan Detection (Priority Order)
+
+### Priority 1: Workflow Session (IMPL_PLAN.md)
+```javascript
+// Check for active workflow session
+const manifest = await mcp__ccw-tools__session_manager({
+  operation: "list",
+  location: "active"
+});
+
+if (manifest.sessions?.length > 0) {
+  const session = manifest.sessions[0];
+  const plan = await mcp__ccw-tools__session_manager({
+    operation: "read",
+    session_id: session.id,
+    content_type: "plan"
+  });
+  sessionAnalysis.sessionId = session.id;
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "workflow";
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = plan.content;
+}
+```
+
+### Priority 2: TodoWrite (Current Session Todos)
+```javascript
+// Extract from conversation - look for TodoWrite tool calls
+// Preserve COMPLETE todo list with all details
+const todos = extractTodosFromConversation();
+if (todos.length > 0) {
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "todo";
+  // Format todos with full context - preserve status markers
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = todos.map(t =>
+    `- [${t.status === 'completed' ? 'x' : t.status === 'in_progress' ? '>' : ' '}] ${t.content}`
+  ).join('\n');
+}
+```
+
+### Priority 3: User-Stated Plan
+```javascript
+// Look for explicit plan statements in user messages:
+// - "Here's my plan: 1. ... 2. ... 3. ..."
+// - "I want to: first..., then..., finally..."
+// - Numbered or bulleted lists describing steps
+const userPlan = extractUserStatedPlan();
+if (userPlan) {
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "user-stated";
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = userPlan;
+}
+```
+
+### Priority 4: Inferred Plan
+```javascript
+// If no explicit plan, infer from:
+// - Task description and breakdown discussion
+// - Sequence of actions taken
+// - Outstanding work mentioned
+const inferredPlan = inferPlanFromDiscussion();
+if (inferredPlan) {
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.source = "inferred";
+  sessionAnalysis.executionPlan.content = inferredPlan;
+}
+```
+
+## 9. Notes
+
+- **Timing**: Execute at task completion or before context switch
+- **Frequency**: Once per independent task or milestone
+- **Recovery**: New session can immediately continue with full context
+- **Knowledge Graph**: Entity relationships auto-extracted for visualization
+- **Absolute Paths**: Critical for cross-session recovery on different machines

.claude/commands/memory/docs-full-cli.md

@@ -37,14 +37,13 @@ Orchestrates project-wide documentation generation using CLI-based execution wit
 - **Behavior**: Generates API.md + README.md for current directory AND subdirectories containing code
 - **Context**: All files in current directory tree (`@**/*`)
 - **Output**: `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/{path}/API.md` + `README.md`
-- **Benefits**: Creates foundation documentation for upper layers to reference
+
 
 #### Single Strategy (Layers 1-2)
 - **Use Case**: Upper layers that aggregate from existing documentation
 - **Behavior**: Generates API.md + README.md only in current directory
 - **Context**: Direct children docs + current directory code files
 - **Output**: `.workflow/docs/{project_name}/{path}/API.md` + `README.md`
-- **Benefits**: Minimal context consumption, clear layer separation
 
 ### Example Flow
 ```
@@ -102,10 +101,10 @@ src/ (depth 1) → SINGLE STRATEGY
 Bash({command: "pwd && basename \"$(pwd)\" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd", run_in_background: false});
 
 // Get module structure with classification
-Bash({command: "~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh", run_in_background: false});
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}'", run_in_background: false});
 
 // OR with path parameter
-Bash({command: "cd <target-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh", run_in_background: false});
+Bash({command: "cd <target-path> && ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}'", run_in_background: false});
 ```
 
 **Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|type:<code|navigation>|...` to extract module paths, types, and count.
@@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
         let strategy = module.depth >= 3 ? "full" : "single";
         for (let tool of tool_order) {
           Bash({
-            command: `cd ${module.path} && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "${strategy}" "." "${project_name}" "${tool}"`,
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"${strategy}","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
             run_in_background: false
           });
           if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
@@ -264,7 +263,7 @@ MODULES:
 
 TOOLS (try in order): {{tool_1}}, {{tool_2}}, {{tool_3}}
 
-EXECUTION SCRIPT: ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh
+EXECUTION SCRIPT: ccw tool exec generate_module_docs
   - Accepts strategy parameter: full | single
   - Accepts folder type detection: code | navigation
   - Tool execution via direct CLI commands (gemini/qwen/codex)
@@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ EXECUTION FLOW (for each module):
   1. Tool fallback loop (exit on first success):
      for tool in {{tool_1}} {{tool_2}} {{tool_3}}; do
        Bash({
-         command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "{{strategy}}" "." "{{project_name}}" "${tool}"`,
+         command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"{{strategy}}","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
          run_in_background: false
        })
        exit_code=$?
@@ -323,7 +322,7 @@ let project_root = get_project_root();
 report("Generating project README.md...");
 for (let tool of tool_order) {
   Bash({
-    command: `cd ${project_root} && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "project-readme" "." "${project_name}" "${tool}"`,
+    command: `cd ${project_root} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"project-readme","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
     run_in_background: false
   });
   if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
@@ -336,7 +335,7 @@ for (let tool of tool_order) {
 report("Generating ARCHITECTURE.md and EXAMPLES.md...");
 for (let tool of tool_order) {
   Bash({
-    command: `cd ${project_root} && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "project-architecture" "." "${project_name}" "${tool}"`,
+    command: `cd ${project_root} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"project-architecture","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
     run_in_background: false
   });
   if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
@@ -351,7 +350,7 @@ if (bash_result.stdout.includes("API_FOUND")) {
   report("Generating HTTP API documentation...");
   for (let tool of tool_order) {
     Bash({
-      command: `cd ${project_root} && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "http-api" "." "${project_name}" "${tool}"`,
+      command: `cd ${project_root} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"http-api","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
       run_in_background: false
     });
     if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {

.claude/commands/memory/docs-related-cli.md

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Orchestrates context-aware documentation generation/update for changed modules u
 Bash({command: "pwd && basename \"$(pwd)\" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd", run_in_background: false});
 
 // Detect changed modules
-Bash({command: "~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list", run_in_background: false});
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec detect_changed_modules '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
 
 // Cache git changes
 Bash({command: "git add -A 2>/dev/null || true", run_in_background: false});
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
       return async () => {
         for (let tool of tool_order) {
           Bash({
-            command: `cd ${module.path} && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "single" "." "${project_name}" "${tool}"`,
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"${project_name}","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
             run_in_background: false
           });
           if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
@@ -207,21 +207,21 @@ EXECUTION:
 For each module above:
   1. Try tool 1:
      Bash({
-       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "single" "." "{{project_name}}" "{{tool_1}}"`,
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"{{tool_1}}"}'`,
        run_in_background: false
      })
      → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with {{tool_1}}", proceed to next module
      → Failure: Try tool 2
   2. Try tool 2:
      Bash({
-       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "single" "." "{{project_name}}" "{{tool_2}}"`,
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"{{tool_2}}"}'`,
        run_in_background: false
      })
      → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with {{tool_2}}", proceed to next module
      → Failure: Try tool 3
   3. Try tool 3:
      Bash({
-       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/generate_module_docs.sh "single" "." "{{project_name}}" "{{tool_3}}"`,
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec generate_module_docs '{"strategy":"single","sourcePath":".","projectName":"{{project_name}}","tool":"{{tool_3}}"}'`,
        run_in_background: false
      })
      → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} docs generated with {{tool_3}}", proceed to next module

.claude/commands/memory/docs.md

@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ Lightweight planner that analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation wo
 | `my_app/src/modules/auth/` | `my_app` | `.workflow/docs/my_app/src/modules/auth/API.md` |
 | `another_project/lib/utils/` | `another_project` | `.workflow/docs/another_project/lib/utils/API.md` |
 
-**Benefits**: Easy to locate documentation, maintains logical organization, clear 1:1 mapping, supports any project structure.
 
 ## Parameters
 
@@ -65,12 +64,17 @@ Lightweight planner that analyzes project structure, decomposes documentation wo
 ```bash
 # Get target path, project name, and root
 bash(pwd && basename "$(pwd)" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd && date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+```
 
-# Create session directories (replace timestamp)
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/.{task,process,summaries})
+```javascript
+// Create docs session (type: docs)
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type docs --new \"{project_name}-docs-{timestamp}\"")
+// Parse output to get sessionId
+```
 
-# Create workflow-session.json (replace values)
-bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-docs-{timestamp}","project":"{project} documentation","status":"planning","timestamp":"2024-01-20T14:30:22+08:00","path":".","target_path":"{target_path}","project_root":"{project_root}","project_name":"{project_name}","mode":"full","tool":"gemini","cli_execute":false}' | jq '.' > .workflow/active/WFS-docs-{timestamp}/workflow-session.json)
+```bash
+# Update workflow-session.json with docs-specific fields
+bash(jq '. + {"target_path":"{target_path}","project_root":"{project_root}","project_name":"{project_name}","mode":"full","tool":"gemini","cli_execute":false}' .workflow/active/{sessionId}/workflow-session.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json .workflow/active/{sessionId}/workflow-session.json)
 ```
 
 ### Phase 2: Analyze Structure
@@ -81,10 +85,10 @@ bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-docs-{timestamp}","project":"{project} documentati
 
 ```bash
 # 1. Run folder analysis
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh)
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}')
 
 # 2. Get top-level directories (first 2 path levels)
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh | ~/.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh | awk -F'|' '{print $1}' | sed 's|^\./||' | awk -F'/' '{if(NF>=2) print $1"/"$2; else if(NF==1) print $1}' | sort -u)
+bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' | ccw tool exec classify_folders '{}' | awk -F'|' '{print $1}' | sed 's|^\./||' | awk -F'/' '{if(NF>=2) print $1"/"$2; else if(NF==1) print $1}' | sort -u)
 
 # 3. Find existing docs (if directory exists)
 bash(if [ -d .workflow/docs/\${project_name} ]; then find .workflow/docs/\${project_name} -type f -name "*.md" ! -path "*/README.md" ! -path "*/ARCHITECTURE.md" ! -path "*/EXAMPLES.md" ! -path "*/api/*" 2>/dev/null; fi)
@@ -181,7 +185,6 @@ Large Projects (single dir >10 docs):
 4. If single dir exceeds 10 docs, split by subdirectories
 5. Create parallel Level 1 tasks with ≤10 docs each
 
-**Benefits**: Parallel execution, failure isolation, progress visibility, context sharing, document count control.
 
 **Commands**:
 
@@ -232,12 +235,12 @@ api_id=$((group_count + 3))
 | Mode | cli_execute | Placement | CLI MODE | Approval Flag | Agent Role |
 |------|-------------|-----------|----------|---------------|------------|
 | **Agent** | false | pre_analysis | analysis | (none) | Generate docs in implementation_approach |
-| **CLI** | true | implementation_approach | write | --approval-mode yolo | Execute CLI commands, validate output |
+| **CLI** | true | implementation_approach | write | --mode write | Execute CLI commands, validate output |
 
 **Command Patterns**:
-- Gemini/Qwen: `cd dir && gemini -p "..."`
-- CLI Mode: `cd dir && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p "..."`
-- Codex: `codex -C dir --full-auto exec "..." --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access`
+- Gemini/Qwen: `ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd dir`
+- CLI Mode: `ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode write --cd dir`
+- Codex: `ccw cli -p "..." --tool codex --mode write --cd dir`
 
 **Generation Process**:
 1. Read configuration values (tool, cli_execute, mode) from workflow-session.json
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ api_id=$((group_count + 3))
 {
   "step": 2,
   "title": "Batch generate documentation via CLI",
-  "command": "bash(dirs=$(jq -r '.groups.assignments[] | select(.group_id == \"${group_number}\") | .directories[]' ${session_dir}/.process/doc-planning-data.json); for dir in $dirs; do cd \"$dir\" && gemini --approval-mode yolo -p \"PURPOSE: Generate module docs\\nTASK: Create documentation\\nMODE: write\\nCONTEXT: @**/* [phase2_context]\\nEXPECTED: API.md and README.md\\nRULES: Mirror structure\" || echo \"Failed: $dir\"; cd -; done)",
+  "command": "ccw cli -p 'PURPOSE: Generate module docs\\nTASK: Create documentation\\nMODE: write\\nCONTEXT: @**/* [phase2_context]\\nEXPECTED: API.md and README.md\\nRULES: Mirror structure' --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${dirs_from_group}",
   "depends_on": [1],
   "output": "generated_docs"
 }
@@ -360,7 +363,7 @@ api_id=$((group_count + 3))
       },
       {
         "step": "analyze_project",
-        "command": "bash(gemini \"PURPOSE: Analyze project structure\\nTASK: Extract overview from modules\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Project outline\")",
+        "command": "bash(ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze project structure\\nTASK: Extract overview from modules\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_module_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Project outline\" --tool gemini --mode analysis)",
         "output_to": "project_outline"
       }
     ],
@@ -400,7 +403,7 @@ api_id=$((group_count + 3))
     "pre_analysis": [
       {"step": "load_existing_docs", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/{ARCHITECTURE,EXAMPLES}.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing docs')", "output_to": "existing_arch_examples"},
       {"step": "load_all_docs", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/README.md && find .workflow/docs/${project_name} -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '*/README.md' ! -path '*/ARCHITECTURE.md' ! -path '*/EXAMPLES.md' ! -path '*/api/*' | xargs cat)", "output_to": "all_docs"},
-      {"step": "analyze_architecture", "command": "bash(gemini \"PURPOSE: Analyze system architecture\\nTASK: Synthesize architectural overview and examples\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture + Examples outline\")", "output_to": "arch_examples_outline"}
+      {"step": "analyze_architecture", "command": "bash(ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Analyze system architecture\\nTASK: Synthesize architectural overview and examples\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: [all_docs]\\nEXPECTED: Architecture + Examples outline\" --tool gemini --mode analysis)", "output_to": "arch_examples_outline"}
     ],
     "implementation_approach": [
       {
@@ -437,7 +440,7 @@ api_id=$((group_count + 3))
     "pre_analysis": [
       {"step": "discover_api", "command": "bash(rg 'router\\.| @(Get|Post)' -g '*.{ts,js}')", "output_to": "endpoint_discovery"},
       {"step": "load_existing_api", "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo 'No existing API docs')", "output_to": "existing_api_docs"},
-      {"step": "analyze_api", "command": "bash(gemini \"PURPOSE: Document HTTP API\\nTASK: Analyze endpoints\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @src/api/**/* [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: API outline\")", "output_to": "api_outline"}
+      {"step": "analyze_api", "command": "bash(ccw cli -p \"PURPOSE: Document HTTP API\\nTASK: Analyze endpoints\\nMODE: analysis\\nCONTEXT: @src/api/**/* [endpoint_discovery]\\nEXPECTED: API outline\" --tool gemini --mode analysis)", "output_to": "api_outline"}
     ],
     "implementation_approach": [
       {
@@ -598,7 +601,7 @@ api_id=$((group_count + 3))
 | Mode | CLI Placement | CLI MODE | Approval Flag | Agent Role |
 |------|---------------|----------|---------------|------------|
 | **Agent (default)** | pre_analysis | analysis | (none) | Generates documentation content |
-| **CLI (--cli-execute)** | implementation_approach | write | --approval-mode yolo | Executes CLI commands, validates output |
+| **CLI (--cli-execute)** | implementation_approach | write | --mode write | Executes CLI commands, validates output |
 
 **Execution Flow**:
 - **Phase 2**: Unified analysis once, results in `.process/`

.claude/commands/memory/load.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ argument-hint: "[--tool gemini|qwen] \"task context description\""
 allowed-tools: Task(*), Bash(*)
 examples:
   - /memory:load "在当前前端基础上开发用户认证功能"
-  - /memory:load --tool qwen -p "重构支付模块API"
+  - /memory:load --tool qwen "重构支付模块API"
 ---
 
 # Memory Load Command (/memory:load)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ The command fully delegates to **universal-executor agent**, which autonomously:
 1. **Analyzes Project Structure**: Executes `get_modules_by_depth.sh` to understand architecture
 2. **Loads Documentation**: Reads CLAUDE.md, README.md and other key docs
 3. **Extracts Keywords**: Derives core keywords from task description
-4. **Discovers Files**: Uses MCP code-index or rg/find to locate relevant files
+4. **Discovers Files**: Uses CodexLens MCP or rg/find to locate relevant files
 5. **CLI Deep Analysis**: Executes Gemini/Qwen CLI for deep context analysis
 6. **Generates Content Package**: Returns structured JSON core content package
 
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ Task(
 
 1. **Project Structure**
    \`\`\`bash
-   bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh)
+   bash(ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}')
    \`\`\`
 
 2. **Core Documentation**
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Task(
 Execute Gemini/Qwen CLI for deep analysis (saves main thread tokens):
 
 \`\`\`bash
-cd . && ${tool} -p "
+ccw cli -p "
 PURPOSE: Extract project core context for task: ${task_description}
 TASK: Analyze project architecture, tech stack, key patterns, relevant files
 MODE: analysis
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ RULES:
 - Identify key architecture patterns and technical constraints
 - Extract integration points and development standards
 - Output concise, structured format
-"
+" --tool ${tool} --mode analysis
 \`\`\`
 
 ### Step 4: Generate Core Content Package
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ Before returning:
 ### Example 2: Using Qwen Tool
 
 ```bash
-/memory:load --tool qwen -p "重构支付模块API"
+/memory:load --tool qwen "重构支付模块API"
 ```
 
 Agent uses Qwen CLI for analysis, returns same structured package.

.claude/commands/memory/skill-memory.md

@@ -508,16 +508,7 @@ User triggers command
 
 ---
 
-## Benefits
 
-- **Pure Orchestrator**: No task JSON generation, delegates to /memory:docs
-- **Auto-Continue**: Autonomous 4-phase execution without user interaction
-- **Intelligent Skip**: Detects existing docs and skips regeneration for fast SKILL updates
-- **Always Fresh Index**: Phase 4 always executes to ensure SKILL.md stays synchronized
-- **Simplified**: ~70% less code than previous version
-- **Maintainable**: Changes to /memory:docs automatically apply
-- **Direct Generation**: Phase 4 directly writes SKILL.md
-- **Flexible**: Supports all /memory:docs options (tool, mode, cli-execute)
 
 ## Architecture
 

.claude/commands/memory/swagger-docs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+name: swagger-docs
+description: Generate complete Swagger/OpenAPI documentation following RESTful standards with global security, API details, error codes, and validation tests
+argument-hint: "[path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--format <yaml|json>] [--version <v3.0|v3.1>] [--lang <zh|en>]"
+---
+
+# Swagger API Documentation Workflow (/memory:swagger-docs)
+
+## Overview
+
+Professional Swagger/OpenAPI documentation generator that strictly follows RESTful API design standards to produce enterprise-grade API documentation.
+
+**Core Features**:
+- **RESTful Standards**: Strict adherence to REST architecture and HTTP semantics
+- **Global Security**: Unified Authorization Token validation mechanism
+- **Complete API Docs**: Descriptions, methods, URLs, parameters for each endpoint
+- **Organized Structure**: Clear directory hierarchy by business domain
+- **Detailed Fields**: Type, required, example, description for each field
+- **Error Code Standards**: Unified error response format and code definitions
+- **Validation Tests**: Boundary conditions and exception handling tests
+
+**Output Structure** (--lang zh):
+```
+.workflow/docs/{project_name}/api/
+├── swagger.yaml              # Main OpenAPI spec file
+├── 概述/
+│   ├── README.md             # API overview
+│   ├── 认证说明.md           # Authentication guide
+│   ├── 错误码规范.md         # Error code definitions
+│   └── 版本历史.md           # Version history
+├── 用户模块/                 # Grouped by business domain
+│   ├── 用户认证.md
+│   ├── 用户管理.md
+│   └── 权限控制.md
+├── 业务模块/
+│   └── ...
+└── 测试报告/
+    ├── 接口测试.md           # API test results
+    └── 边界测试.md           # Boundary condition tests
+```
+
+**Output Structure** (--lang en):
+```
+.workflow/docs/{project_name}/api/
+├── swagger.yaml              # Main OpenAPI spec file
+├── overview/
+│   ├── README.md             # API overview
+│   ├── authentication.md     # Authentication guide
+│   ├── error-codes.md        # Error code definitions
+│   └── changelog.md          # Version history
+├── users/                    # Grouped by business domain
+│   ├── authentication.md
+│   ├── management.md
+│   └── permissions.md
+├── orders/
+│   └── ...
+└── test-reports/
+    ├── api-tests.md          # API test results
+    └── boundary-tests.md     # Boundary condition tests
+```
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:swagger-docs [path] [--tool <gemini|qwen|codex>] [--format <yaml|json>] [--version <v3.0|v3.1>] [--lang <zh|en>]
+```
+
+- **path**: API source code directory (default: current directory)
+- **--tool**: CLI tool selection (default: gemini)
+  - `gemini`: Comprehensive analysis, pattern recognition
+  - `qwen`: Architecture analysis, system design
+  - `codex`: Implementation validation, code quality
+- **--format**: OpenAPI spec format (default: yaml)
+  - `yaml`: YAML format (recommended, better readability)
+  - `json`: JSON format
+- **--version**: OpenAPI version (default: v3.0)
+  - `v3.0`: OpenAPI 3.0.x
+  - `v3.1`: OpenAPI 3.1.0 (supports JSON Schema 2020-12)
+- **--lang**: Documentation language (default: zh)
+  - `zh`: Chinese documentation with Chinese directory names
+  - `en`: English documentation with English directory names
+
+## Planning Workflow
+
+### Phase 1: Initialize Session
+
+```bash
+# Get project info
+bash(pwd && basename "$(pwd)" && git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd && date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)
+```
+
+```javascript
+// Create swagger-docs session
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type swagger-docs --new \"{project_name}-swagger-{timestamp}\"")
+// Parse output to get sessionId
+```
+
+```bash
+# Update workflow-session.json
+bash(jq '. + {"target_path":"{target_path}","project_root":"{project_root}","project_name":"{project_name}","format":"yaml","openapi_version":"3.0.3","lang":"{lang}","tool":"gemini"}' .workflow/active/{sessionId}/workflow-session.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json .workflow/active/{sessionId}/workflow-session.json)
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Scan API Endpoints
+
+**Discovery Patterns**: Auto-detect framework signatures and API definition styles.
+
+**Supported Frameworks**:
+| Framework | Detection Pattern | Example |
+|-----------|-------------------|---------|
+| Express.js | `router.get/post/put/delete` | `router.get('/users/:id')` |
+| Fastify | `fastify.route`, `@Route` | `fastify.get('/api/users')` |
+| NestJS | `@Controller`, `@Get/@Post` | `@Get('users/:id')` |
+| Koa | `router.get`, `ctx.body` | `router.get('/users')` |
+| Hono | `app.get/post`, `c.json` | `app.get('/users/:id')` |
+| FastAPI | `@app.get`, `@router.post` | `@app.get("/users/{id}")` |
+| Flask | `@app.route`, `@bp.route` | `@app.route('/users')` |
+| Spring | `@GetMapping`, `@PostMapping` | `@GetMapping("/users/{id}")` |
+| Go Gin | `r.GET`, `r.POST` | `r.GET("/users/:id")` |
+| Go Chi | `r.Get`, `r.Post` | `r.Get("/users/{id}")` |
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Detect API framework type
+bash(
+  if rg -q "@Controller|@Get|@Post|@Put|@Delete" --type ts 2>/dev/null; then echo "NESTJS";
+  elif rg -q "router\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)" --type ts --type js 2>/dev/null; then echo "EXPRESS";
+  elif rg -q "fastify\.(get|post|route)" --type ts --type js 2>/dev/null; then echo "FASTIFY";
+  elif rg -q "@app\.(get|post|put|delete)" --type py 2>/dev/null; then echo "FASTAPI";
+  elif rg -q "@GetMapping|@PostMapping|@RequestMapping" --type java 2>/dev/null; then echo "SPRING";
+  elif rg -q 'r\.(GET|POST|PUT|DELETE)' --type go 2>/dev/null; then echo "GO_GIN";
+  else echo "UNKNOWN"; fi
+)
+
+# 2. Scan all API endpoint definitions
+bash(rg -n "(router|app|fastify)\.(get|post|put|delete|patch)|@(Get|Post|Put|Delete|Patch|Controller|RequestMapping)" --type ts --type js --type py --type java --type go -g '!*.test.*' -g '!*.spec.*' -g '!node_modules/**' 2>/dev/null | head -200)
+
+# 3. Extract route paths
+bash(rg -o "['\"](/api)?/[a-zA-Z0-9/:_-]+['\"]" --type ts --type js --type py -g '!*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | sort -u | head -100)
+
+# 4. Detect existing OpenAPI/Swagger files
+bash(find . -type f \( -name "swagger.yaml" -o -name "swagger.json" -o -name "openapi.yaml" -o -name "openapi.json" \) ! -path "*/node_modules/*" 2>/dev/null)
+
+# 5. Extract DTO/Schema definitions
+bash(rg -n "export (interface|type|class).*Dto|@ApiProperty|class.*Schema" --type ts -g '!*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | head -100)
+```
+
+**Data Processing**: Parse outputs, use **Write tool** to create `${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json`:
+
+```json
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "generated_at": "2025-01-01T12:00:00+08:00",
+    "project_name": "project_name",
+    "project_root": "/path/to/project",
+    "openapi_version": "3.0.3",
+    "format": "yaml",
+    "lang": "zh"
+  },
+  "framework": {
+    "type": "NESTJS",
+    "detected_patterns": ["@Controller", "@Get", "@Post"],
+    "base_path": "/api/v1"
+  },
+  "endpoints": [
+    {
+      "file": "src/modules/users/users.controller.ts",
+      "line": 25,
+      "method": "GET",
+      "path": "/api/v1/users/:id",
+      "handler": "getUser",
+      "controller": "UsersController"
+    }
+  ],
+  "existing_specs": {
+    "found": false,
+    "files": []
+  },
+  "dto_schemas": [
+    {
+      "name": "CreateUserDto",
+      "file": "src/modules/users/dto/create-user.dto.ts",
+      "properties": ["email", "password", "name"]
+    }
+  ],
+  "statistics": {
+    "total_endpoints": 45,
+    "by_method": {"GET": 20, "POST": 15, "PUT": 5, "DELETE": 5},
+    "by_module": {"users": 12, "auth": 8, "orders": 15, "products": 10}
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Analyze API Structure
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Analyze controller/route file structure
+bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json | jq -r '.endpoints[].file' | sort -u | head -20)
+
+# 2. Extract request/response types
+bash(for f in $(jq -r '.dto_schemas[].file' ${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json | head -20); do echo "=== $f ===" && cat "$f" 2>/dev/null; done)
+
+# 3. Analyze authentication middleware
+bash(rg -n "auth|guard|middleware|jwt|bearer|token" -i --type ts --type js -g '!*.test.*' -g '!node_modules/**' 2>/dev/null | head -50)
+
+# 4. Detect error handling patterns
+bash(rg -n "HttpException|BadRequest|Unauthorized|Forbidden|NotFound|throw new" --type ts --type js -g '!*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | head -50)
+```
+
+**Deep Analysis via Gemini CLI**:
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze API structure and generate OpenAPI specification outline for comprehensive documentation
+TASK: 
+• Parse all API endpoints and identify business module boundaries
+• Extract request parameters, request bodies, and response formats
+• Identify authentication mechanisms and security requirements
+• Discover error handling patterns and error codes
+• Map endpoints to logical module groups
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @src/**/*.controller.ts @src/**/*.routes.ts @src/**/*.dto.ts @src/**/middleware/**/*
+EXPECTED: JSON format API structure analysis report with modules, endpoints, security schemes, and error codes
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Strict RESTful standards | Identify all public endpoints | Document output language: {lang}
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {project_root}
+```
+
+**Update swagger-planning-data.json** with analysis results:
+
+```json
+{
+  "api_structure": {
+    "modules": [
+      {
+        "name": "Users",
+        "name_zh": "用户模块",
+        "base_path": "/api/v1/users",
+        "endpoints": [
+          {
+            "path": "/api/v1/users",
+            "method": "GET",
+            "operation_id": "listUsers",
+            "summary": "List all users",
+            "summary_zh": "获取用户列表",
+            "description": "Paginated list of system users with filtering by status and role",
+            "description_zh": "分页获取系统用户列表，支持按状态、角色筛选",
+            "tags": ["User Management"],
+            "tags_zh": ["用户管理"],
+            "security": ["bearerAuth"],
+            "parameters": {
+              "query": ["page", "limit", "status", "role"]
+            },
+            "responses": {
+              "200": "UserListResponse",
+              "401": "UnauthorizedError",
+              "403": "ForbiddenError"
+            }
+          }
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "security_schemes": {
+      "bearerAuth": {
+        "type": "http",
+        "scheme": "bearer",
+        "bearerFormat": "JWT",
+        "description": "JWT Token authentication. Add Authorization: Bearer <token> to request header"
+      }
+    },
+    "error_codes": [
+      {"code": "AUTH_001", "status": 401, "message": "Invalid or expired token", "message_zh": "Token 无效或已过期"},
+      {"code": "AUTH_002", "status": 401, "message": "Authentication required", "message_zh": "未提供认证信息"},
+      {"code": "AUTH_003", "status": 403, "message": "Insufficient permissions", "message_zh": "权限不足"}
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Task Decomposition
+
+**Task Hierarchy**:
+
+```
+Level 1: Infrastructure Tasks (Parallel)
+  ├─ IMPL-001: Generate main OpenAPI spec file (swagger.yaml)
+  ├─ IMPL-002: Generate global security config and auth documentation
+  └─ IMPL-003: Generate unified error code specification
+
+Level 2: Module Documentation Tasks (Parallel, by business module)
+  ├─ IMPL-004: Users module API documentation
+  ├─ IMPL-005: Auth module API documentation
+  ├─ IMPL-006: Business module N API documentation
+  └─ ...
+
+Level 3: Aggregation Tasks (Depends on Level 1-2)
+  ├─ IMPL-N+1: Generate API overview and navigation
+  └─ IMPL-N+2: Generate version history and changelog
+
+Level 4: Validation Tasks (Depends on Level 1-3)
+  ├─ IMPL-N+3: API endpoint validation tests
+  └─ IMPL-N+4: Boundary condition tests
+```
+
+**Grouping Strategy**:
+1. Group by business module (users, orders, products, etc.)
+2. Maximum 10 endpoints per task
+3. Large modules (>10 endpoints) split by submodules
+
+**Commands**:
+
+```bash
+# 1. Count endpoints by module
+bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json | jq '.statistics.by_module')
+
+# 2. Calculate task groupings
+bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json | jq -r '.api_structure.modules[] | "\(.name):\(.endpoints | length)"')
+```
+
+**Data Processing**: Use **Edit tool** to update `swagger-planning-data.json` with task groups:
+
+```json
+{
+  "task_groups": {
+    "level1_count": 3,
+    "level2_count": 5,
+    "total_count": 12,
+    "assignments": [
+      {"task_id": "IMPL-001", "level": 1, "type": "openapi-spec", "title": "Generate OpenAPI main spec file"},
+      {"task_id": "IMPL-002", "level": 1, "type": "security", "title": "Generate global security config"},
+      {"task_id": "IMPL-003", "level": 1, "type": "error-codes", "title": "Generate error code specification"},
+      {"task_id": "IMPL-004", "level": 2, "type": "module-doc", "module": "users", "endpoint_count": 12},
+      {"task_id": "IMPL-005", "level": 2, "type": "module-doc", "module": "auth", "endpoint_count": 8}
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Generate Task JSONs
+
+**Generation Process**:
+1. Read configuration values from workflow-session.json
+2. Read task groups from swagger-planning-data.json
+3. Generate Level 1 tasks (infrastructure)
+4. Generate Level 2 tasks (by module)
+5. Generate Level 3-4 tasks (aggregation and validation)
+
+## Task Templates
+
+### Level 1-1: OpenAPI Main Spec File
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-001",
+  "title": "Generate OpenAPI main specification file",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "swagger-openapi-spec",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "priority": "critical"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Generate OpenAPI 3.0.3 compliant swagger.yaml",
+      "Include complete info, servers, tags, paths, components definitions",
+      "Follow RESTful design standards, use {lang} for descriptions"
+    ],
+    "precomputed_data": {
+      "planning_data": "${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json"
+    }
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_analysis_data",
+        "action": "Load API analysis data",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json)"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "api_analysis"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate OpenAPI spec file",
+        "description": "Create complete swagger.yaml specification file",
+        "cli_prompt": "PURPOSE: Generate OpenAPI 3.0.3 specification file from analyzed API structure\nTASK:\n• Define openapi version: 3.0.3\n• Define info: title, description, version, contact, license\n• Define servers: development, staging, production environments\n• Define tags: organized by business modules\n• Define paths: all API endpoints with complete specifications\n• Define components: schemas, securitySchemes, parameters, responses\nMODE: write\nCONTEXT: @[api_analysis]\nEXPECTED: Complete swagger.yaml file following OpenAPI 3.0.3 specification\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/swagger-api.txt) | Use {lang} for all descriptions | Strict RESTful standards",
+        "output": "swagger.yaml"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/swagger.yaml"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 1-2: Global Security Configuration
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-002",
+  "title": "Generate global security configuration and authentication guide",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "swagger-security",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Document Authorization header format in detail",
+      "Describe token acquisition, refresh, and expiration mechanisms",
+      "List permission requirements for each endpoint"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "analyze_auth",
+        "command": "bash(rg -n 'auth|guard|jwt|bearer' -i --type ts -g '!*.test.*' 2>/dev/null | head -50)",
+        "output_to": "auth_patterns"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate authentication documentation",
+        "cli_prompt": "PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive authentication documentation for API security\nTASK:\n• Document authentication mechanism: JWT Bearer Token\n• Explain header format: Authorization: Bearer <token>\n• Describe token lifecycle: acquisition, refresh, expiration handling\n• Define permission levels: public, user, admin, super_admin\n• Document authentication failure responses: 401/403 error handling\nMODE: write\nCONTEXT: @[auth_patterns] @src/**/auth/**/* @src/**/guard/**/*\nEXPECTED: Complete authentication guide in {lang}\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Include code examples | Clear step-by-step instructions",
+        "output": "{auth_doc_name}"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/{overview_dir}/{auth_doc_name}"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 1-3: Unified Error Code Specification
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-003",
+  "title": "Generate unified error code specification",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "swagger-error-codes",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Define unified error response format",
+      "Create categorized error code system (auth, business, system)",
+      "Provide detailed description and examples for each error code"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate error code specification document",
+        "cli_prompt": "PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive error code specification for consistent API error handling\nTASK:\n• Define error response format: {code, message, details, timestamp}\n• Document authentication errors (AUTH_xxx): 401/403 series\n• Document parameter errors (PARAM_xxx): 400 series\n• Document business errors (BIZ_xxx): business logic errors\n• Document system errors (SYS_xxx): 500 series\n• For each error code: HTTP status, error message, possible causes, resolution suggestions\nMODE: write\nCONTEXT: @src/**/*.exception.ts @src/**/*.filter.ts\nEXPECTED: Complete error code specification in {lang} with tables and examples\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Include response examples | Clear categorization",
+        "output": "{error_doc_name}"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/{overview_dir}/{error_doc_name}"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 2: Module API Documentation (Template)
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${module_task_id}",
+  "title": "Generate ${module_name} API documentation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "IMPL-002", "IMPL-003"],
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "swagger-module-doc",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini",
+    "module": "${module_name}",
+    "endpoint_count": "${endpoint_count}"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Complete documentation for all endpoints in this module",
+      "Each endpoint: description, method, URL, parameters, responses",
+      "Include success and failure response examples",
+      "Mark API version and last update time"
+    ],
+    "focus_paths": ["${module_source_paths}"]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_module_endpoints",
+        "action": "Load module endpoint information",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cat ${session_dir}/.process/swagger-planning-data.json | jq '.api_structure.modules[] | select(.name == \"${module_name}\")')"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "module_endpoints"
+      },
+      {
+        "step": "read_source_files",
+        "action": "Read module source files",
+        "commands": [
+          "bash(cat ${module_source_files})"
+        ],
+        "output_to": "source_code"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate module API documentation",
+        "description": "Generate complete API documentation for ${module_name}",
+        "cli_prompt": "PURPOSE: Generate complete RESTful API documentation for ${module_name} module\nTASK:\n• Create module overview: purpose, use cases, prerequisites\n• Generate endpoint index: grouped by functionality\n• For each endpoint document:\n  - Functional description: purpose and business context\n  - Request method: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE\n  - URL path: complete API path\n  - Request headers: Authorization and other required headers\n  - Path parameters: {id} and other path variables\n  - Query parameters: pagination, filters, etc.\n  - Request body: JSON Schema format\n  - Response body: success and error responses\n  - Field description table: type, required, example, description\n• Add usage examples: cURL, JavaScript, Python\n• Add version info: v1.0.0, last updated date\nMODE: write\nCONTEXT: @[module_endpoints] @[source_code]\nEXPECTED: Complete module API documentation in {lang} with all endpoints fully documented\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/documentation/swagger-api.txt) | RESTful standards | Include all response codes",
+        "output": "${module_doc_name}"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/${module_dir}/${module_doc_name}"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 3: API Overview and Navigation
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${overview_task_id}",
+  "title": "Generate API overview and navigation",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-001", "...", "IMPL-${last_module_task_id}"],
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "swagger-overview",
+    "agent": "@doc-generator",
+    "tool": "gemini"
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_all_docs",
+        "command": "bash(find .workflow/docs/${project_name}/api -type f -name '*.md' ! -path '*/{overview_dir}/*' | xargs cat)",
+        "output_to": "all_module_docs"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate API overview",
+        "cli_prompt": "PURPOSE: Generate API overview document with navigation and quick start guide\nTASK:\n• Create introduction: system features, tech stack, version\n• Write quick start guide: authentication, first request example\n• Build module navigation: categorized links to all modules\n• Document environment configuration: development, staging, production\n• List SDKs and tools: client libraries, Postman collection\nMODE: write\nCONTEXT: @[all_module_docs] @.workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/swagger.yaml\nEXPECTED: Complete API overview in {lang} with navigation links\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Clear structure | Quick start focus",
+        "output": "README.md"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/{overview_dir}/README.md"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Level 4: Validation Tasks
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "IMPL-${test_task_id}",
+  "title": "API endpoint validation tests",
+  "status": "pending",
+  "depends_on": ["IMPL-${overview_task_id}"],
+  "meta": {
+    "type": "swagger-validation",
+    "agent": "@test-fix-agent",
+    "tool": "codex"
+  },
+  "context": {
+    "requirements": [
+      "Validate accessibility of all endpoints",
+      "Test various boundary conditions",
+      "Verify exception handling"
+    ]
+  },
+  "flow_control": {
+    "pre_analysis": [
+      {
+        "step": "load_swagger_spec",
+        "command": "bash(cat .workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/swagger.yaml)",
+        "output_to": "swagger_spec"
+      }
+    ],
+    "implementation_approach": [
+      {
+        "step": 1,
+        "title": "Generate test report",
+        "cli_prompt": "PURPOSE: Generate comprehensive API test validation report\nTASK:\n• Document test environment configuration\n• Calculate endpoint coverage statistics\n• Report test results: pass/fail counts\n• Document boundary tests: parameter limits, null values, special characters\n• Document exception tests: auth failures, permission denied, resource not found\n• List issues found with recommendations\nMODE: write\nCONTEXT: @[swagger_spec]\nEXPECTED: Complete test report in {lang} with detailed results\nRULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Include test cases | Clear pass/fail status",
+        "output": "{test_doc_name}"
+      }
+    ],
+    "target_files": [
+      ".workflow/docs/${project_name}/api/{test_dir}/{test_doc_name}"
+    ]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Language-Specific Directory Mapping
+
+| Component | --lang zh | --lang en |
+|-----------|-----------|-----------|
+| Overview dir | 概述 | overview |
+| Auth doc | 认证说明.md | authentication.md |
+| Error doc | 错误码规范.md | error-codes.md |
+| Changelog | 版本历史.md | changelog.md |
+| Users module | 用户模块 | users |
+| Orders module | 订单模块 | orders |
+| Products module | 商品模块 | products |
+| Test dir | 测试报告 | test-reports |
+| API test doc | 接口测试.md | api-tests.md |
+| Boundary test doc | 边界测试.md | boundary-tests.md |
+
+## API Documentation Template
+
+### Single Endpoint Format
+
+Each endpoint must include:
+
+```markdown
+### Get User Details
+
+**Description**: Retrieve detailed user information by ID, including profile and permissions.
+
+**Endpoint Info**:
+
+| Property | Value |
+|----------|-------|
+| Method | GET |
+| URL | `/api/v1/users/{id}` |
+| Version | v1.0.0 |
+| Updated | 2025-01-01 |
+| Auth | Bearer Token |
+| Permission | user / admin |
+
+**Request Headers**:
+
+| Field | Type | Required | Example | Description |
+|-------|------|----------|---------|-------------|
+| Authorization | string | Yes | `Bearer eyJhbGc...` | JWT Token |
+| Content-Type | string | No | `application/json` | Request content type |
+
+**Path Parameters**:
+
+| Field | Type | Required | Example | Description |
+|-------|------|----------|---------|-------------|
+| id | string | Yes | `usr_123456` | Unique user identifier |
+
+**Query Parameters**:
+
+| Field | Type | Required | Default | Example | Description |
+|-------|------|----------|---------|---------|-------------|
+| include | string | No | - | `roles,permissions` | Related data to include |
+
+**Success Response** (200 OK):
+
+```json
+{
+  "code": 0,
+  "message": "success",
+  "data": {
+    "id": "usr_123456",
+    "email": "user@example.com",
+    "name": "John Doe",
+    "status": "active",
+    "roles": ["user"],
+    "created_at": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+    "updated_at": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z"
+  },
+  "timestamp": "2025-01-01T12:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+**Response Fields**:
+
+| Field | Type | Description |
+|-------|------|-------------|
+| code | integer | Business status code, 0 = success |
+| message | string | Response message |
+| data.id | string | Unique user identifier |
+| data.email | string | User email address |
+| data.name | string | User display name |
+| data.status | string | User status: active/inactive/suspended |
+| data.roles | array | User role list |
+| data.created_at | string | Creation timestamp (ISO 8601) |
+| data.updated_at | string | Last update timestamp (ISO 8601) |
+
+**Error Responses**:
+
+| Status | Code | Message | Possible Cause |
+|--------|------|---------|----------------|
+| 401 | AUTH_001 | Invalid or expired token | Token format error or expired |
+| 403 | AUTH_003 | Insufficient permissions | No access to this user info |
+| 404 | USER_001 | User not found | User ID doesn't exist or deleted |
+
+**Examples**:
+
+```bash
+# cURL
+curl -X GET "https://api.example.com/api/v1/users/usr_123456" \
+  -H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGc..." \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json"
+```
+
+```javascript
+// JavaScript (fetch)
+const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/api/v1/users/usr_123456', {
+  method: 'GET',
+  headers: {
+    'Authorization': 'Bearer eyJhbGc...',
+    'Content-Type': 'application/json'
+  }
+});
+const data = await response.json();
+```
+```
+
+## Session Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/
+└── WFS-swagger-{timestamp}/
+    ├── workflow-session.json
+    ├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+    ├── TODO_LIST.md
+    ├── .process/
+    │   └── swagger-planning-data.json
+    └── .task/
+        ├── IMPL-001.json              # OpenAPI spec
+        ├── IMPL-002.json              # Security config
+        ├── IMPL-003.json              # Error codes
+        ├── IMPL-004.json              # Module 1 API
+        ├── ...
+        ├── IMPL-N+1.json              # API overview
+        └── IMPL-N+2.json              # Validation tests
+```
+
+## Execution Commands
+
+```bash
+# Execute entire workflow
+/workflow:execute
+
+# Specify session
+/workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-swagger-yyyymmdd-hhmmss"
+
+# Single task execution
+/task:execute IMPL-001
+```
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:execute` - Execute documentation tasks
+- `/workflow:status` - View task progress
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Mark session complete
+- `/memory:docs` - General documentation workflow

.claude/commands/memory/tech-research-rules.md

@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+---
+name: tech-research-rules
+description: "3-phase orchestrator: extract tech stack → Exa research → generate path-conditional rules (auto-loaded by Claude Code)"
+argument-hint: "[session-id | tech-stack-name] [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Tech Stack Rules Generator
+
+## Overview
+
+**Purpose**: Generate multi-layered, path-conditional rules that Claude Code automatically loads based on file context.
+
+**Output Structure**:
+```
+.claude/rules/tech/{tech-stack}/
+├── core.md           # paths: **/*.{ext} - Core principles
+├── patterns.md       # paths: src/**/*.{ext} - Implementation patterns
+├── testing.md        # paths: **/*.{test,spec}.{ext} - Testing rules
+├── config.md         # paths: *.config.* - Configuration rules
+├── api.md            # paths: **/api/**/* - API rules (backend only)
+├── components.md     # paths: **/components/**/* - Component rules (frontend only)
+└── metadata.json     # Generation metadata
+```
+
+**Templates Location**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/`
+
+---
+
+## Core Rules
+
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization
+2. **Path-Conditional Output**: Every rule file includes `paths` frontmatter
+3. **Template-Driven**: Agent reads templates before generating content
+4. **Agent Produces Files**: Agent writes all rule files directly
+5. **No Manual Loading**: Rules auto-activate when Claude works with matching files
+
+---
+
+## 3-Phase Execution
+
+### Phase 1: Prepare Context & Detect Tech Stack
+
+**Goal**: Detect input mode, extract tech stack info, determine file extensions
+
+**Input Mode Detection**:
+```bash
+input="$1"
+
+if [[ "$input" == WFS-* ]]; then
+  MODE="session"
+  SESSION_ID="$input"
+  # Read workflow-session.json to extract tech stack
+else
+  MODE="direct"
+  TECH_STACK_NAME="$input"
+fi
+```
+
+**Tech Stack Analysis**:
+```javascript
+// Decompose composite tech stacks
+// "typescript-react-nextjs" → ["typescript", "react", "nextjs"]
+
+const TECH_EXTENSIONS = {
+  "typescript": "{ts,tsx}",
+  "javascript": "{js,jsx}",
+  "python": "py",
+  "rust": "rs",
+  "go": "go",
+  "java": "java",
+  "csharp": "cs",
+  "ruby": "rb",
+  "php": "php"
+};
+
+const FRAMEWORK_TYPE = {
+  "react": "frontend",
+  "vue": "frontend",
+  "angular": "frontend",
+  "nextjs": "fullstack",
+  "nuxt": "fullstack",
+  "fastapi": "backend",
+  "express": "backend",
+  "django": "backend",
+  "rails": "backend"
+};
+```
+
+**Check Existing Rules**:
+```bash
+normalized_name=$(echo "$TECH_STACK_NAME" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '-')
+rules_dir=".claude/rules/tech/${normalized_name}"
+existing_count=$(find "${rules_dir}" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
+```
+
+**Skip Decision**:
+- If `existing_count > 0` AND no `--regenerate` → `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+- If `--regenerate` → Delete existing and regenerate
+
+**Output Variables**:
+- `TECH_STACK_NAME`: Normalized name
+- `PRIMARY_LANG`: Primary language
+- `FILE_EXT`: File extension pattern
+- `FRAMEWORK_TYPE`: frontend | backend | fullstack | library
+- `COMPONENTS`: Array of tech components
+- `SKIP_GENERATION`: Boolean
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 1 completed
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Produces Path-Conditional Rules
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skipped if `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
+
+**Goal**: Delegate to agent for Exa research and rule file generation
+
+**Template Files**:
+```
+~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/
+├── tech-rules-agent-prompt.txt  # Agent instructions
+├── rule-core.txt                # Core principles template
+├── rule-patterns.txt            # Implementation patterns template
+├── rule-testing.txt             # Testing rules template
+├── rule-config.txt              # Configuration rules template
+├── rule-api.txt                 # API rules template (backend)
+└── rule-components.txt          # Component rules template (frontend)
+```
+
+**Agent Task**:
+
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
+  description: `Generate tech stack rules: ${TECH_STACK_NAME}`,
+  prompt: `
+You are generating path-conditional rules for Claude Code.
+
+## Context
+- Tech Stack: ${TECH_STACK_NAME}
+- Primary Language: ${PRIMARY_LANG}
+- File Extensions: ${FILE_EXT}
+- Framework Type: ${FRAMEWORK_TYPE}
+- Components: ${JSON.stringify(COMPONENTS)}
+- Output Directory: .claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/
+
+## Instructions
+
+Read the agent prompt template for detailed instructions:
+$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/rules/tech-rules-agent-prompt.txt)
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+1. Execute Exa research queries (see agent prompt)
+2. Read each rule template
+3. Generate rule files following template structure
+4. Write files to output directory
+5. Write metadata.json
+6. Report completion
+
+## Variable Substitutions
+
+Replace in templates:
+- {TECH_STACK_NAME} → ${TECH_STACK_NAME}
+- {PRIMARY_LANG} → ${PRIMARY_LANG}
+- {FILE_EXT} → ${FILE_EXT}
+- {FRAMEWORK_TYPE} → ${FRAMEWORK_TYPE}
+`
+})
+```
+
+**Completion Criteria**:
+- 4-6 rule files written with proper `paths` frontmatter
+- metadata.json written
+- Agent reports files created
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Verify & Report
+
+**Goal**: Verify generated files and provide usage summary
+
+**Steps**:
+
+1. **Verify Files**:
+   ```bash
+   find ".claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}" -name "*.md" -type f
+   ```
+
+2. **Validate Frontmatter**:
+   ```bash
+   head -5 ".claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/core.md"
+   ```
+
+3. **Read Metadata**:
+   ```javascript
+   Read(`.claude/rules/tech/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/metadata.json`)
+   ```
+
+4. **Generate Summary Report**:
+   ```
+   Tech Stack Rules Generated
+
+   Tech Stack: {TECH_STACK_NAME}
+   Location: .claude/rules/tech/{TECH_STACK_NAME}/
+
+   Files Created:
+   ├── core.md         → paths: **/*.{ext}
+   ├── patterns.md     → paths: src/**/*.{ext}
+   ├── testing.md      → paths: **/*.{test,spec}.{ext}
+   ├── config.md       → paths: *.config.*
+   ├── api.md          → paths: **/api/**/* (if backend)
+   └── components.md   → paths: **/components/**/* (if frontend)
+
+   Auto-Loading:
+   - Rules apply automatically when editing matching files
+   - No manual loading required
+
+   Example Activation:
+   - Edit src/components/Button.tsx → core.md + patterns.md + components.md
+   - Edit tests/api.test.ts → core.md + testing.md
+   - Edit package.json → config.md
+   ```
+
+**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
+
+---
+
+## Path Pattern Reference
+
+| Pattern | Matches |
+|---------|---------|
+| `**/*.ts` | All .ts files |
+| `src/**/*` | All files under src/ |
+| `*.config.*` | Config files in root |
+| `**/*.{ts,tsx}` | .ts and .tsx files |
+
+| Tech Stack | Core Pattern | Test Pattern |
+|------------|--------------|--------------|
+| TypeScript | `**/*.{ts,tsx}` | `**/*.{test,spec}.{ts,tsx}` |
+| Python | `**/*.py` | `**/test_*.py, **/*_test.py` |
+| Rust | `**/*.rs` | `**/tests/**/*.rs` |
+| Go | `**/*.go` | `**/*_test.go` |
+
+---
+
+## Parameters
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research [session-id | "tech-stack-name"] [--regenerate]
+```
+
+**Arguments**:
+- **session-id**: `WFS-*` format - Extract from workflow session
+- **tech-stack-name**: Direct input - `"typescript"`, `"typescript-react"`
+- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate existing rules
+
+---
+
+## Examples
+
+### Single Language
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "typescript"
+```
+
+**Output**: `.claude/rules/tech/typescript/` with 4 rule files
+
+### Frontend Stack
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "typescript-react"
+```
+
+**Output**: `.claude/rules/tech/typescript-react/` with 5 rule files (includes components.md)
+
+### Backend Stack
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research "python-fastapi"
+```
+
+**Output**: `.claude/rules/tech/python-fastapi/` with 5 rule files (includes api.md)
+
+### From Session
+
+```bash
+/memory:tech-research WFS-user-auth-20251104
+```
+
+**Workflow**: Extract tech stack from session → Generate rules
+
+---
+
+## Comparison: Rules vs SKILL
+
+| Aspect | SKILL Memory | Rules |
+|--------|--------------|-------|
+| Loading | Manual: `Skill("tech")` | Automatic by path |
+| Scope | All files when loaded | Only matching files |
+| Granularity | Monolithic packages | Per-file-type |
+| Context | Full package | Only relevant rules |
+
+**When to Use**:
+- **Rules**: Tech stack conventions per file type
+- **SKILL**: Reference docs, APIs, examples for manual lookup

.claude/commands/memory/tech-research.md

@@ -1,477 +0,0 @@
----
-name: tech-research
-description: 3-phase orchestrator: extract tech stack from session/name → delegate to agent for Exa research and module generation → generate SKILL.md index (skips phase 2 if exists)
-argument-hint: "[session-id | tech-stack-name] [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]"
-allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*), Task(*)
----
-
-# Tech Stack Research SKILL Generator
-
-## Overview
-
-**Pure Orchestrator with Agent Delegation**: Prepares context paths and delegates ALL work to agent. Agent produces files directly.
-
-**Auto-Continue Workflow**: Runs fully autonomously once triggered. Each phase completes and automatically triggers the next phase.
-
-**Execution Paths**:
-- **Full Path**: All 3 phases (no existing SKILL OR `--regenerate` specified)
-- **Skip Path**: Phase 1 → Phase 3 (existing SKILL found AND no `--regenerate` flag)
-- **Phase 3 Always Executes**: SKILL index is always generated or updated
-
-**Agent Responsibility**:
-- Agent does ALL the work: context reading, Exa research, content synthesis, file writing
-- Orchestrator only provides context paths and waits for completion
-
-## Core Rules
-
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
-2. **Context Path Delegation**: Pass session directory or tech stack name to agent, let agent do discovery
-3. **Agent Produces Files**: Agent directly writes all module files, orchestrator does NOT parse agent output
-4. **Auto-Continue**: After completing each phase, update TodoWrite and immediately execute next phase
-5. **No User Prompts**: Never ask user questions or wait for input between phases
-6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite after EVERY phase completion before starting next phase
-7. **Lightweight Index**: Phase 3 only generates SKILL.md index by reading existing files
-
----
-
-## 3-Phase Execution
-
-### Phase 1: Prepare Context Paths
-
-**Goal**: Detect input mode, prepare context paths for agent, check existing SKILL
-
-**Input Mode Detection**:
-```bash
-# Get input parameter
-input="$1"
-
-# Detect mode
-if [[ "$input" == WFS-* ]]; then
-  MODE="session"
-  SESSION_ID="$input"
-  CONTEXT_PATH=".workflow/${SESSION_ID}"
-else
-  MODE="direct"
-  TECH_STACK_NAME="$input"
-  CONTEXT_PATH="$input"  # Pass tech stack name as context
-fi
-```
-
-**Check Existing SKILL**:
-```bash
-# For session mode, peek at session to get tech stack name
-if [[ "$MODE" == "session" ]]; then
-  bash(test -f ".workflow/${SESSION_ID}/workflow-session.json")
-  Read(.workflow/${SESSION_ID}/workflow-session.json)
-  # Extract tech_stack_name (minimal extraction)
-fi
-
-# Normalize and check
-normalized_name=$(echo "$TECH_STACK_NAME" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '-')
-bash(test -d ".claude/skills/${normalized_name}" && echo "exists" || echo "not_exists")
-bash(find ".claude/skills/${normalized_name}" -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | wc -l || echo 0)
-```
-
-**Skip Decision**:
-```javascript
-if (existing_files > 0 && !regenerate_flag) {
-  SKIP_GENERATION = true
-  message = "Tech stack SKILL already exists, skipping Phase 2. Use --regenerate to force regeneration."
-} else if (regenerate_flag) {
-  bash(rm -rf ".claude/skills/${normalized_name}")
-  SKIP_GENERATION = false
-  message = "Regenerating tech stack SKILL from scratch."
-} else {
-  SKIP_GENERATION = false
-  message = "No existing SKILL found, generating new tech stack documentation."
-}
-```
-
-**Output Variables**:
-- `MODE`: `session` or `direct`
-- `SESSION_ID`: Session ID (if session mode)
-- `CONTEXT_PATH`: Path to session directory OR tech stack name
-- `TECH_STACK_NAME`: Extracted or provided tech stack name
-- `SKIP_GENERATION`: Boolean - whether to skip Phase 2
-
-**TodoWrite**:
-- If skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
-- If not skipping: Mark phase 1 completed, phase 2 in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 2: Agent Produces All Files
-
-**Skip Condition**: Skipped if `SKIP_GENERATION = true`
-
-**Goal**: Delegate EVERYTHING to agent - context reading, Exa research, content synthesis, and file writing
-
-**Agent Task Specification**:
-
-```
-Task(
-  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
-  description: "Generate tech stack SKILL: {CONTEXT_PATH}",
-  prompt: "
-Generate a complete tech stack SKILL package with Exa research.
-
-**Context Provided**:
-- Mode: {MODE}
-- Context Path: {CONTEXT_PATH}
-
-**Templates Available**:
-- Module Format: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-module-format.txt
-- SKILL Index: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-skill-index.txt
-
-**Your Responsibilities**:
-
-1. **Extract Tech Stack Information**:
-
-   IF MODE == 'session':
-     - Read `.workflow/active/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`
-     - Read `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json`
-     - Extract tech_stack: {language, frameworks, libraries}
-     - Build tech stack name: \"{language}-{framework1}-{framework2}\"
-     - Example: \"typescript-react-nextjs\"
-
-   IF MODE == 'direct':
-     - Tech stack name = CONTEXT_PATH
-     - Parse composite: split by '-' delimiter
-     - Example: \"typescript-react-nextjs\" → [\"typescript\", \"react\", \"nextjs\"]
-
-2. **Execute Exa Research** (4-6 parallel queries):
-
-   Base Queries (always execute):
-   - mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{tech} core principles best practices 2025\", tokensNum: 8000)
-   - mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{tech} common patterns architecture examples\", tokensNum: 7000)
-   - mcp__exa__web_search_exa(query: \"{tech} configuration setup tooling 2025\", numResults: 5)
-   - mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{tech} testing strategies\", tokensNum: 5000)
-
-   Component Queries (if composite):
-   - For each additional component:
-     mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(query: \"{main_tech} {component} integration\", tokensNum: 5000)
-
-3. **Read Module Format Template**:
-
-   Read template for structure guidance:
-   ```bash
-   Read(~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-module-format.txt)
-   ```
-
-4. **Synthesize Content into 6 Modules**:
-
-   Follow template structure from tech-module-format.txt:
-   - **principles.md** - Core concepts, philosophies (~3K tokens)
-   - **patterns.md** - Implementation patterns with code examples (~5K tokens)
-   - **practices.md** - Best practices, anti-patterns, pitfalls (~4K tokens)
-   - **testing.md** - Testing strategies, frameworks (~3K tokens)
-   - **config.md** - Setup, configuration, tooling (~3K tokens)
-   - **frameworks.md** - Framework integration (only if composite, ~4K tokens)
-
-   Each module follows template format:
-   - Frontmatter (YAML)
-   - Main sections with clear headings
-   - Code examples from Exa research
-   - Best practices sections
-   - References to Exa sources
-
-5. **Write Files Directly**:
-
-   ```javascript
-   // Create directory
-   bash(mkdir -p \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}\")
-
-   // Write each module file using Write tool
-   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/principles.md\", content: ... })
-   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/patterns.md\", content: ... })
-   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/practices.md\", content: ... })
-   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/testing.md\", content: ... })
-   Write({ file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/config.md\", content: ... })
-   // Write frameworks.md only if composite
-
-   // Write metadata.json
-   Write({
-     file_path: \".claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/metadata.json\",
-     content: JSON.stringify({
-       tech_stack_name,
-       components,
-       is_composite,
-       generated_at: timestamp,
-       source: \"exa-research\",
-       research_summary: { total_queries, total_sources }
-     })
-   })
-   ```
-
-6. **Report Completion**:
-
-   Provide summary:
-   - Tech stack name
-   - Files created (count)
-   - Exa queries executed
-   - Sources consulted
-
-**CRITICAL**:
-- MUST read external template files before generating content (step 3 for modules, step 4 for index)
-- You have FULL autonomy - read files, execute Exa, synthesize content, write files
-- Do NOT return JSON or structured data - produce actual .md files
-- Handle errors gracefully (Exa failures, missing files, template read failures)
-- If tech stack cannot be determined, ask orchestrator to clarify
-  "
-)
-```
-
-**Completion Criteria**:
-- Agent task executed successfully
-- 5-6 modular files written to `.claude/skills/{tech_stack_name}/`
-- metadata.json written
-- Agent reports completion
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 2 completed, phase 3 in_progress
-
----
-
-### Phase 3: Generate SKILL.md Index
-
-**Note**: This phase **ALWAYS executes** - generates or updates the SKILL index.
-
-**Goal**: Read generated module files and create SKILL.md index with loading recommendations
-
-**Steps**:
-
-1. **Verify Generated Files**:
-   ```bash
-   bash(find ".claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}" -name "*.md" -type f | sort)
-   ```
-
-2. **Read metadata.json**:
-   ```javascript
-   Read(.claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/metadata.json)
-   // Extract: tech_stack_name, components, is_composite, research_summary
-   ```
-
-3. **Read Module Headers** (optional, first 20 lines):
-   ```javascript
-   Read(.claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/principles.md, limit: 20)
-   // Repeat for other modules
-   ```
-
-4. **Read SKILL Index Template**:
-
-   ```javascript
-   Read(~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/tech/tech-skill-index.txt)
-   ```
-
-5. **Generate SKILL.md Index**:
-
-   Follow template from tech-skill-index.txt with variable substitutions:
-   - `{TECH_STACK_NAME}`: From metadata.json
-   - `{MAIN_TECH}`: Primary technology
-   - `{ISO_TIMESTAMP}`: Current timestamp
-   - `{QUERY_COUNT}`: From research_summary
-   - `{SOURCE_COUNT}`: From research_summary
-   - Conditional sections for composite tech stacks
-
-   Template provides structure for:
-   - Frontmatter with metadata
-   - Overview and tech stack description
-   - Module organization (Core/Practical/Config sections)
-   - Loading recommendations (Quick/Implementation/Complete)
-   - Usage guidelines and auto-trigger keywords
-   - Research metadata and version history
-
-6. **Write SKILL.md**:
-   ```javascript
-   Write({
-     file_path: `.claude/skills/${TECH_STACK_NAME}/SKILL.md`,
-     content: generatedIndexMarkdown
-   })
-   ```
-
-**Completion Criteria**:
-- SKILL.md index written
-- All module files verified
-- Loading recommendations included
-
-**TodoWrite**: Mark phase 3 completed
-
-**Final Report**:
-```
-Tech Stack SKILL Package Complete
-
-Tech Stack: {TECH_STACK_NAME}
-Location: .claude/skills/{TECH_STACK_NAME}/
-
-Files: SKILL.md + 5-6 modules + metadata.json
-Exa Research: {queries} queries, {sources} sources
-
-Usage: Skill(command: "{TECH_STACK_NAME}")
-```
-
----
-
-## Implementation Details
-
-### TodoWrite Patterns
-
-**Initialization** (Before Phase 1):
-```javascript
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Preparing context paths"},
-  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Agent producing files"},
-  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating SKILL index"}
-]})
-```
-
-**Full Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = false):
-```javascript
-// After Phase 1
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
-  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "in_progress", ...},
-  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "pending", ...}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 2
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
-  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "completed", ...},
-  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
-]})
-
-// After Phase 3
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
-  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "completed", ...},
-  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "completed", ...}
-]})
-```
-
-**Skip Path** (SKIP_GENERATION = true):
-```javascript
-// After Phase 1 (skip Phase 2)
-TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Prepare context paths", "status": "completed", ...},
-  {"content": "Agent produces all module files", "status": "completed", ...},  // Skipped
-  {"content": "Generate SKILL.md index", "status": "in_progress", ...}
-]})
-```
-
-### Execution Flow
-
-**Full Path**:
-```
-User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (prepare) → Phase 2 (agent writes files) → Phase 3 (write index) → Report
-```
-
-**Skip Path**:
-```
-User → TodoWrite Init → Phase 1 (detect existing) → Phase 3 (update index) → Report
-```
-
-### Error Handling
-
-**Phase 1 Errors**:
-- Invalid session ID: Report error, verify session exists
-- Missing context-package: Warn, fall back to direct mode
-- No tech stack detected: Ask user to specify tech stack name
-
-**Phase 2 Errors (Agent)**:
-- Agent task fails: Retry once, report if fails again
-- Exa API failures: Agent handles internally with retries
-- Incomplete results: Warn user, proceed with partial data if minimum sections available
-
-**Phase 3 Errors**:
-- Write failures: Report which files failed
-- Missing files: Note in SKILL.md, suggest regeneration
-
----
-
-## Parameters
-
-```bash
-/memory:tech-research [session-id | "tech-stack-name"] [--regenerate] [--tool <gemini|qwen>]
-```
-
-**Arguments**:
-- **session-id | tech-stack-name**: Input source (auto-detected by WFS- prefix)
-  - Session mode: `WFS-user-auth-v2` - Extract tech stack from workflow
-  - Direct mode: `"typescript"`, `"typescript-react-nextjs"` - User specifies
-- **--regenerate**: Force regenerate existing SKILL (deletes and recreates)
-- **--tool**: Reserved for future CLI integration (default: gemini)
-
----
-
-## Examples
-
-**Generated File Structure** (for all examples):
-```
-.claude/skills/{tech-stack}/
-├── SKILL.md           # Index (Phase 3)
-├── principles.md      # Agent (Phase 2)
-├── patterns.md        # Agent
-├── practices.md       # Agent
-├── testing.md         # Agent
-├── config.md          # Agent
-├── frameworks.md      # Agent (if composite)
-└── metadata.json      # Agent
-```
-
-### Direct Mode - Single Stack
-
-```bash
-/memory:tech-research "typescript"
-```
-
-**Workflow**:
-1. Phase 1: Detects direct mode, checks existing SKILL
-2. Phase 2: Agent executes 4 Exa queries, writes 5 modules
-3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index
-
-### Direct Mode - Composite Stack
-
-```bash
-/memory:tech-research "typescript-react-nextjs"
-```
-
-**Workflow**:
-1. Phase 1: Decomposes into ["typescript", "react", "nextjs"]
-2. Phase 2: Agent executes 6 Exa queries (4 base + 2 components), writes 6 modules (adds frameworks.md)
-3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index with framework integration
-
-### Session Mode - Extract from Workflow
-
-```bash
-/memory:tech-research WFS-user-auth-20251104
-```
-
-**Workflow**:
-1. Phase 1: Reads session, extracts tech stack: `python-fastapi-sqlalchemy`
-2. Phase 2: Agent researches Python + FastAPI + SQLAlchemy, writes 6 modules
-3. Phase 3: Generates SKILL.md index
-
-### Regenerate Existing
-
-```bash
-/memory:tech-research "react" --regenerate
-```
-
-**Workflow**:
-1. Phase 1: Deletes existing SKILL due to --regenerate
-2. Phase 2: Agent executes fresh Exa research (latest 2025 practices)
-3. Phase 3: Generates updated SKILL.md
-
-### Skip Path - Fast Update
-
-```bash
-/memory:tech-research "python"
-```
-
-**Scenario**: SKILL already exists with 7 files
-
-**Workflow**:
-1. Phase 1: Detects existing SKILL, sets SKIP_GENERATION = true
-2. Phase 2: **SKIPPED**
-3. Phase 3: Updates SKILL.md index only (5-10x faster)
-
-

.claude/commands/memory/update-full.md

@@ -36,13 +36,12 @@ Orchestrates project-wide CLAUDE.md updates using batched agent execution with a
 - **Use Case**: Deepest directories with unstructured file layouts
 - **Behavior**: Generates CLAUDE.md for current directory AND each subdirectory containing files
 - **Context**: All files in current directory tree (`@**/*`)
-- **Benefits**: Creates foundation documentation for upper layers to reference
+
 
 #### Single-Layer Strategy (Layers 1-2)
 - **Use Case**: Upper layers that aggregate from existing documentation
 - **Behavior**: Generates CLAUDE.md only for current directory
 - **Context**: Direct children CLAUDE.md files + current directory code files
-- **Benefits**: Minimal context consumption, clear layer separation
 
 ### Example Flow
 ```
@@ -100,10 +99,10 @@ src/ (depth 1) → SINGLE-LAYER STRATEGY
 Bash({command: "git add -A 2>/dev/null || true", run_in_background: false});
 
 // Get module structure
-Bash({command: "~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list", run_in_background: false});
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
 
 // OR with --path
-Bash({command: "cd <target-path> && ~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh list", run_in_background: false});
+Bash({command: "cd <target-path> && ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
 ```
 
 **Parse output** `depth:N|path:<PATH>|...` to extract module paths and count.
@@ -186,7 +185,7 @@ for (let layer of [3, 2, 1]) {
         let strategy = module.depth >= 3 ? "multi-layer" : "single-layer";
         for (let tool of tool_order) {
           Bash({
-            command: `cd ${module.path} && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "${strategy}" "." "${tool}"`,
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"${strategy}","path":".","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
             run_in_background: false
           });
           if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
@@ -245,7 +244,7 @@ MODULES:
 
 TOOLS (try in order): {{tool_1}}, {{tool_2}}, {{tool_3}}
 
-EXECUTION SCRIPT: ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh
+EXECUTION SCRIPT: ccw tool exec update_module_claude
   - Accepts strategy parameter: multi-layer | single-layer
   - Tool execution via direct CLI commands (gemini/qwen/codex)
 
@@ -253,7 +252,7 @@ EXECUTION FLOW (for each module):
   1. Tool fallback loop (exit on first success):
      for tool in {{tool_1}} {{tool_2}} {{tool_3}}; do
        Bash({
-         command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "{{strategy}}" "." "${tool}"`,
+         command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"{{strategy}}","path":".","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
          run_in_background: false
        })
        exit_code=$?

.claude/commands/memory/update-related.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Orchestrates context-aware CLAUDE.md updates for changed modules using batched a
 
 ```javascript
 // Detect changed modules
-Bash({command: "~/.claude/scripts/detect_changed_modules.sh list", run_in_background: false});
+Bash({command: "ccw tool exec detect_changed_modules '{\"format\":\"list\"}'", run_in_background: false});
 
 // Cache git changes
 Bash({command: "git add -A 2>/dev/null || true", run_in_background: false});
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ for (let depth of sorted_depths.reverse()) {  // N → 0
       return async () => {
         for (let tool of tool_order) {
           Bash({
-            command: `cd ${module.path} && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "${tool}"`,
+            command: `cd ${module.path} && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"${tool}"}'`,
             run_in_background: false
           });
           if (bash_result.exit_code === 0) {
@@ -184,21 +184,21 @@ EXECUTION:
 For each module above:
   1. Try tool 1:
      Bash({
-       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "{{tool_1}}"`,
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"{{tool_1}}"}'`,
        run_in_background: false
      })
      → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with {{tool_1}}", proceed to next module
      → Failure: Try tool 2
   2. Try tool 2:
      Bash({
-       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "{{tool_2}}"`,
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"{{tool_2}}"}'`,
        run_in_background: false
      })
      → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with {{tool_2}}", proceed to next module
      → Failure: Try tool 3
   3. Try tool 3:
      Bash({
-       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ~/.claude/scripts/update_module_claude.sh "single-layer" "." "{{tool_3}}"`,
+       command: `cd "{{module_path}}" && ccw tool exec update_module_claude '{"strategy":"single-layer","path":".","tool":"{{tool_3}}"}'`,
        run_in_background: false
      })
      → Success: Report "✅ {{module_path}} updated with {{tool_3}}", proceed to next module

.claude/commands/memory/workflow-skill-memory.md

@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ Objectives:
 
 3. Use Gemini for aggregation (optional):
    Command pattern:
-   cd .workflow/.archives/{session_id} && gemini -p "
+   ccw cli -p "
    PURPOSE: Extract lessons and conflicts from workflow session
    TASK:
    • Analyze IMPL_PLAN and lessons from manifest
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Objectives:
    CONTEXT: @IMPL_PLAN.md @workflow-session.json
    EXPECTED: Structured lessons and conflicts in JSON format
    RULES: Template reference from skill-aggregation.txt
-   "
+   " --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd .workflow/.archives/{session_id}
 
 3.5. **Generate SKILL.md Description** (CRITICAL for auto-loading):
 
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ Objectives:
    - Sort sessions by date
 
 2. Use Gemini for final aggregation:
-   gemini -p "
+   ccw cli -p "
    PURPOSE: Aggregate lessons and conflicts from all workflow sessions
    TASK:
    • Group successes by functional domain
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ Objectives:
    CONTEXT: [Provide aggregated JSON data]
    EXPECTED: Final aggregated structure for SKILL documents
    RULES: Template reference from skill-aggregation.txt
-   "
+   " --tool gemini --mode analysis
 
 3. Read templates for formatting (same 4 templates as single mode)
 

.claude/commands/workflow/action-plan-verify.md

@@ -32,12 +32,16 @@ Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items be
 IF --session parameter provided:
     session_id = provided session
 ELSE:
-    CHECK: find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d
-    IF active_session EXISTS:
-        session_id = get_active_session()
-    ELSE:
+    # Auto-detect active session
+    active_sessions = bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
+    IF active_sessions is empty:
         ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id>"
         EXIT
+    ELSE IF active_sessions has multiple entries:
+        # Use most recently modified session
+        session_id = bash(ls -td .workflow/active/WFS-*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
+    ELSE:
+        session_id = basename(active_sessions[0])
 
 # Derive absolute paths
 session_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}
@@ -45,13 +49,15 @@ brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
 task_dir = session_dir/.task
 
 # Validate required artifacts
-SYNTHESIS = brainstorm_dir/role analysis documents
+# Note: "role analysis documents" refers to [role]/analysis.md files (e.g., product-manager/analysis.md)
+SYNTHESIS_DIR = brainstorm_dir  # Contains role analysis files: */analysis.md
 IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
 TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
 
 # Abort if missing
-IF NOT EXISTS(SYNTHESIS):
-    ERROR: "role analysis documents not found. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
+SYNTHESIS_FILES = Glob(brainstorm_dir/*/analysis.md)
+IF SYNTHESIS_FILES.count == 0:
+    ERROR: "No role analysis documents found in .brainstorming/*/analysis.md. Run /workflow:brainstorm:synthesis first"
     EXIT
 
 IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
@@ -95,7 +101,7 @@ Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
 - Dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
 - Context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, artifacts)
 - Flow control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach)
-- Meta (complexity, priority, use_codex)
+- Meta (complexity, priority)
 
 ### 3. Build Semantic Models
 
@@ -135,27 +141,27 @@ Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder i
 - **Unmapped Tasks**: Tasks with no clear requirement linkage
 - **NFR Coverage Gaps**: Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability) not reflected in tasks
 
-#### B. Consistency Validation
+#### C. Consistency Validation
 
 - **Requirement Conflicts**: Tasks contradicting synthesis requirements
 - **Architecture Drift**: IMPL_PLAN architecture not matching synthesis ADRs
 - **Terminology Drift**: Same concept named differently across IMPL_PLAN and tasks
 - **Data Model Inconsistency**: Tasks referencing entities/fields not in synthesis data model
 
-#### C. Dependency Integrity
+#### D. Dependency Integrity
 
 - **Circular Dependencies**: Task A depends on B, B depends on C, C depends on A
 - **Missing Dependencies**: Task requires outputs from another task but no explicit dependency
 - **Broken Dependencies**: Task depends on non-existent task ID
 - **Logical Ordering Issues**: Implementation tasks before foundational setup without dependency note
 
-#### D. Synthesis Alignment
+#### E. Synthesis Alignment
 
 - **Priority Conflicts**: High-priority synthesis requirements mapped to low-priority tasks
 - **Success Criteria Mismatch**: IMPL_PLAN success criteria not covering synthesis acceptance criteria
 - **Risk Mitigation Gaps**: Critical risks in synthesis without corresponding mitigation tasks
 
-#### E. Task Specification Quality
+#### F. Task Specification Quality
 
 - **Ambiguous Focus Paths**: Tasks with vague or missing focus_paths
 - **Underspecified Acceptance**: Tasks without clear acceptance criteria
@@ -163,12 +169,12 @@ Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder i
 - **Weak Flow Control**: Tasks without clear implementation_approach or pre_analysis steps
 - **Missing Target Files**: Tasks without flow_control.target_files specification
 
-#### F. Duplication Detection
+#### G. Duplication Detection
 
 - **Overlapping Task Scope**: Multiple tasks with nearly identical descriptions
 - **Redundant Requirements Coverage**: Same requirement covered by multiple tasks without clear partitioning
 
-#### G. Feasibility Assessment
+#### H. Feasibility Assessment
 
 - **Complexity Misalignment**: Task marked "simple" but requires multiple file modifications
 - **Resource Conflicts**: Parallel tasks requiring same resources/files
@@ -203,7 +209,9 @@ Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
 
 ### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
 
-Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
+**Report Generation**: Generate report content and save to file.
+
+Output a Markdown report with the following structure:
 
 ```markdown
 ## Action Plan Verification Report
@@ -217,7 +225,11 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 ### Executive Summary
 
 - **Overall Risk Level**: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
-- **Recommendation**: BLOCK_EXECUTION | PROCEED_WITH_FIXES | PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION | PROCEED
+- **Recommendation**: (See decision matrix below)
+  - BLOCK_EXECUTION: Critical issues exist (must fix before proceeding)
+  - PROCEED_WITH_FIXES: High issues exist, no critical (fix recommended before execution)
+  - PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION: Medium issues only (proceed with awareness)
+  - PROCEED: Low issues only or no issues (safe to execute)
 - **Critical Issues**: {count}
 - **High Issues**: {count}
 - **Medium Issues**: {count}
@@ -322,14 +334,27 @@ Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
 
 #### Action Recommendations
 
-**If CRITICAL Issues Exist**:
-- **BLOCK EXECUTION** - Resolve critical issues before proceeding
-- Use TodoWrite to track all required fixes
-- Fix broken dependencies and circular references
+**Recommendation Decision Matrix**:
 
-**If Only HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW Issues**:
-- **PROCEED WITH CAUTION** - Fix high-priority issues first
-- Use TodoWrite to systematically track and complete all improvements
+| Condition | Recommendation | Action |
+|-----------|----------------|--------|
+| Critical > 0 | BLOCK_EXECUTION | Must resolve all critical issues before proceeding |
+| Critical = 0, High > 0 | PROCEED_WITH_FIXES | Fix high-priority issues before execution |
+| Critical = 0, High = 0, Medium > 0 | PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION | Proceed with awareness of medium issues |
+| Only Low or None | PROCEED | Safe to execute workflow |
+
+**If CRITICAL Issues Exist** (BLOCK_EXECUTION):
+- Resolve all critical issues before proceeding
+- Use TodoWrite to track required fixes
+- Fix broken dependencies and circular references first
+
+**If HIGH Issues Exist** (PROCEED_WITH_FIXES):
+- Fix high-priority issues before execution
+- Use TodoWrite to systematically track and complete improvements
+
+**If Only MEDIUM/LOW Issues** (PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION / PROCEED):
+- Can proceed with execution
+- Address issues during or after implementation
 
 #### TodoWrite-Based Remediation Workflow
 
@@ -359,13 +384,18 @@ Priority Order:
 
 ### 7. Save Report and Execute TodoWrite-Based Remediation
 
-**Save Analysis Report**:
+**Step 7.1: Save Analysis Report**:
 ```bash
 report_path = ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
 Write(report_path, full_report_content)
 ```
 
-**After Report Generation**:
+**Step 7.2: Display Report Summary to User**:
+- Show executive summary with counts
+- Display recommendation (BLOCK/PROCEED_WITH_FIXES/PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION/PROCEED)
+- List critical and high issues if any
+
+**Step 7.3: After Report Generation**:
 
 1. **Extract Findings**: Parse all issues by severity
 2. **Create TodoWrite Task List**: Convert findings to actionable todos

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/api-designer.md

@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ ELSE:
 **Framework-Based Analysis** (when guidance-specification.md exists):
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
      prompt="Generate API designer analysis addressing topic framework
 
      ## Framework Integration Required
@@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
 # For existing analysis updates
 IF update_mode = "incremental":
     Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         run_in_background=false,
          prompt="Update existing API designer analysis
 
          ## Current Analysis Context

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/artifacts.md

@@ -2,452 +2,360 @@
 name: artifacts
 description: Interactive clarification generating confirmed guidance specification through role-based analysis and synthesis
 argument-hint: "topic or challenge description [--count N]"
-allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*)
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
 ---
 
 ## Overview
 
-Six-phase workflow: **Automatic project context collection** → Extract topic challenges → Select roles → Generate task-specific questions → Detect conflicts → Generate confirmed guidance (declarative statements only).
+Seven-phase workflow: **Context collection** → **Topic analysis** → **Role selection** → **Role questions** → **Conflict resolution** → **Final check** → **Generate specification**
+
+All user interactions use AskUserQuestion tool (max 4 questions per call, multi-round).
 
 **Input**: `"GOAL: [objective] SCOPE: [boundaries] CONTEXT: [background]" [--count N]`
-**Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md` (CONFIRMED/SELECTED format)
-**Core Principle**: Questions dynamically generated from project context + topic keywords/challenges, NOT from generic templates
+**Output**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
+**Core Principle**: Questions dynamically generated from project context + topic keywords, NOT generic templates
 
 **Parameters**:
 - `topic` (required): Topic or challenge description (structured format recommended)
-- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles user WANTS to select (system will recommend N+2 options for user to choose from, default: 3)
+- `--count N` (optional): Number of roles to select (system recommends N+2 options, default: 3)
+
+---
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+### Phase Summary
+
+| Phase | Goal | AskUserQuestion | Storage |
+|-------|------|-----------------|---------|
+| 0 | Context collection | - | context-package.json |
+| 1 | Topic analysis | 2-4 questions | intent_context |
+| 2 | Role selection | 1 multi-select | selected_roles |
+| 3 | Role questions | 3-4 per role | role_decisions[role] |
+| 4 | Conflict resolution | max 4 per round | cross_role_decisions |
+| 4.5 | Final check | progressive rounds | additional_decisions |
+| 5 | Generate spec | - | guidance-specification.md |
+
+### AskUserQuestion Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Single-select (Phase 1, 3, 4)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "{问题文本}",
+      header: "{短标签}",  // max 12 chars
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" },
+        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" },
+        { label: "{选项}", description: "{说明和影响}" }
+      ]
+    }
+    // ... max 4 questions per call
+  ]
+})
+
+// Multi-select (Phase 2)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "请选择 {count} 个角色",
+    header: "角色选择",
+    multiSelect: true,
+    options: [/* max 4 options per call */]
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+### Multi-Round Execution
+
+```javascript
+const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
+for (let i = 0; i < allQuestions.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+  const batch = allQuestions.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
+  AskUserQuestion({ questions: batch });
+  // Store responses before next round
+}
+```
+
+---
 
 ## Task Tracking
 
-**⚠️ TodoWrite Rule**: EXTEND auto-parallel's task list (NOT replace/overwrite)
+**TodoWrite Rule**: EXTEND auto-parallel's task list (NOT replace/overwrite)
 
 **When called from auto-parallel**:
-- Find the artifacts parent task: "Execute artifacts command for interactive framework generation"
-- Mark parent task as "in_progress"
-- APPEND artifacts sub-tasks AFTER the parent task (Phase 0-5)
-- Mark each sub-task as it completes
-- When Phase 5 completes, mark parent task as "completed"
-- **PRESERVE all other auto-parallel tasks** (role agents, synthesis)
+- Find artifacts parent task → Mark "in_progress"
+- APPEND sub-tasks (Phase 0-5) → Mark each as completes
+- When Phase 5 completes → Mark parent "completed"
+- PRESERVE all other auto-parallel tasks
 
 **Standalone Mode**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Initialize session (.workflow/active/ session check, parse --count parameter)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
-  {"content": "Phase 0: Automatic project context collection (call context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 0 context collection"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1: Extract challenges, output 2-4 task-specific questions, wait for user input", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 1 topic analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2: Recommend count+2 roles, output role selection, wait for user input", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 2 role selection"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3: Generate 3-4 questions per role, output and wait for answers (max 10 per round)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 3 role questions"},
-  {"content": "Phase 4: Detect conflicts, output clarifications, wait for answers (max 10 per round)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4 conflict resolution"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5: Transform Q&A to declarative statements, write guidance-specification.md", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 5 document generation"}
+  {"content": "Initialize session", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Context collection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 0"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Topic analysis (2-4 questions)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 1"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Role selection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 2"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Role questions (per role)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 3"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict resolution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4.5: Final clarification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 4.5"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: Generate specification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Phase 5"}
 ]
 ```
 
-## User Interaction Protocol
-
-### Question Output Format
-
-All questions output as structured text (detailed format with descriptions):
-
-```markdown
-【问题{N} - {短标签}】{问题文本}
-a) {选项标签}
-   说明：{选项说明和影响}
-b) {选项标签}
-   说明：{选项说明和影响}
-c) {选项标签}
-   说明：{选项说明和影响}
-
-请回答：{N}a 或 {N}b 或 {N}c
-```
-
-**Multi-select format** (Phase 2 role selection):
-```markdown
-【角色选择】请选择 {count} 个角色参与头脑风暴分析
-
-a) {role-name} ({中文名})
-   推荐理由：{基于topic的相关性说明}
-b) {role-name} ({中文名})
-   推荐理由：{基于topic的相关性说明}
-...
-
-支持格式：
-- 分别选择：2a 2c 2d (选择第2题的a、c、d选项)
-- 合并语法：2acd (选择a、c、d)
-- 逗号分隔：2a,c,d
-
-请输入选择：
-```
-
-### Input Parsing Rules
-
-**Supported formats** (intelligent parsing):
-
-1. **Space-separated**: `1a 2b 3c` → Q1:a, Q2:b, Q3:c
-2. **Comma-separated**: `1a,2b,3c` → Q1:a, Q2:b, Q3:c
-3. **Multi-select combined**: `2abc` → Q2: options a,b,c
-4. **Multi-select spaces**: `2 a b c` → Q2: options a,b,c
-5. **Multi-select comma**: `2a,b,c` → Q2: options a,b,c
-6. **Natural language**: `问题1选a` → 1a (fallback parsing)
-
-**Parsing algorithm**:
-- Extract question numbers and option letters
-- Validate question numbers match output
-- Validate option letters exist for each question
-- If ambiguous/invalid, output example format and request re-input
-
-**Error handling** (lenient):
-- Recognize common variations automatically
-- If parsing fails, show example and wait for clarification
-- Support re-input without penalty
-
-### Batching Strategy
-
-**Batch limits**:
-- **Default**: Maximum 10 questions per round
-- **Phase 2 (role selection)**: Display all recommended roles at once (count+2 roles)
-- **Auto-split**: If questions > 10, split into multiple rounds with clear round indicators
-
-**Round indicators**:
-```markdown
-===== 第 1 轮问题 (共2轮) =====
-【问题1 - ...】...
-【问题2 - ...】...
-...
-【问题10 - ...】...
-
-请回答 (格式: 1a 2b ... 10c)：
-```
-
-### Interaction Flow
-
-**Standard flow**:
-1. Output questions in formatted text
-2. Output expected input format example
-3. Wait for user input
-4. Parse input with intelligent matching
-5. If parsing succeeds → Store answers and continue
-6. If parsing fails → Show error, example, and wait for re-input
-
-**No question/option limits**: Text-based interaction removes previous 4-question and 4-option restrictions
+---
 
 ## Execution Phases
 
 ### Session Management
+
 - Check `.workflow/active/` for existing sessions
-- Multiple sessions → Prompt selection | Single → Use it | None → Create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
-- Parse `--count N` parameter from user input (default: 3 if not specified)
-- Store decisions in `workflow-session.json` including count parameter
+- Multiple → Prompt selection | Single → Use it | None → Create `WFS-[topic-slug]`
+- Parse `--count N` parameter (default: 3)
+- Store decisions in `workflow-session.json`
 
-### Phase 0: Automatic Project Context Collection
+### Phase 0: Context Collection
 
-**Goal**: Gather project architecture, documentation, and relevant code context BEFORE user interaction
+**Goal**: Gather project context BEFORE user interaction
 
-**Detection Mechanism** (execute first):
-```javascript
-// Check if context-package already exists
-const contextPackagePath = `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`;
+**Steps**:
+1. Check if `context-package.json` exists → Skip if valid
+2. Invoke `context-search-agent` (BRAINSTORM MODE - lightweight)
+3. Output: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
 
-if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
-  // Validate package
-  const package = Read(contextPackagePath);
-  if (package.metadata.session_id === session_id) {
-    console.log("✅ Valid context-package found, skipping Phase 0");
-    return; // Skip to Phase 1
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Implementation**: Invoke `context-search-agent` only if package doesn't exist
+**Graceful Degradation**: If agent fails, continue to Phase 1 without context
 
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="context-search-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
   description="Gather project context for brainstorm",
   prompt=`
-You are executing as context-search-agent (.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md).
+Execute context-search-agent in BRAINSTORM MODE (Phase 1-2 only).
 
-## Execution Mode
-**BRAINSTORM MODE** (Lightweight) - Phase 1-2 only (skip deep analysis)
+Session: ${session_id}
+Task: ${task_description}
+Output: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
 
-## Session Information
-- **Session ID**: ${session_id}
-- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
-- **Output Path**: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
-
-## Mission
-Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for implementation planning:
-
-### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
-1. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
-2. **Foundation**: Initialize code-index, get project structure, load docs
-3. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity
-
-### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
-Execute all 3 discovery tracks:
-- **Track 1**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
-- **Track 2**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
-- **Track 3**: Codebase analysis (5-layer discovery: files, content, patterns, deps, config/tests)
-
-### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
-1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
-2. Synthesize 3-source data (docs > code > web)
-3. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
-4. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
-5. Generate and validate context-package.json
-
-## Output Requirements
-Complete context-package.json with:
-- **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
-- **project_context**: architecture_patterns, coding_conventions, tech_stack
-- **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
-- **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
-- **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
-- **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy}
-
-## Quality Validation
-Before completion verify:
-- [ ] Valid JSON format with all required fields
-- [ ] File relevance accuracy >80%
-- [ ] Dependency graph complete (max 2 transitive levels)
-- [ ] Conflict risk level calculated correctly
-- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
-- [ ] Total files ≤50 (prioritize high-relevance)
-
-Execute autonomously following agent documentation.
-Report completion with statistics.
+Required fields: metadata, project_context, assets, dependencies, conflict_detection
 `
 )
 ```
 
-**Graceful Degradation**:
-- If agent fails: Log warning, continue to Phase 1 without project context
-- If package invalid: Re-run context-search-agent
+### Phase 1: Topic Analysis
 
-### Phase 1: Topic Analysis & Intent Classification
-
-**Goal**: Extract keywords/challenges to drive all subsequent question generation, **enriched by Phase 0 project context**
+**Goal**: Extract keywords/challenges enriched by Phase 0 context
 
 **Steps**:
-1. **Load Phase 0 context** (if available):
-   - Read `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.process/context-package.json`
-   - Extract: tech_stack, existing modules, conflict_risk, relevant files
+1. Load Phase 0 context (tech_stack, modules, conflict_risk)
+2. Deep topic analysis (entities, challenges, constraints, metrics)
+3. Generate 2-4 context-aware probing questions
+4. AskUserQuestion → Store to `session.intent_context`
 
-2. **Deep topic analysis** (context-aware):
-   - Extract technical entities from topic + existing codebase
-   - Identify core challenges considering existing architecture
-   - Consider constraints (timeline/budget/compliance)
-   - Define success metrics based on current project state
-
-3. **Generate 2-4 context-aware probing questions**:
-   - Reference existing tech stack in questions
-   - Consider integration with existing modules
-   - Address identified conflict risks from Phase 0
-   - Target root challenges and trade-off priorities
-
-4. **User interaction**: Output questions using text format (see User Interaction Protocol), wait for user input
-
-5. **Parse user answers**: Use intelligent parsing to extract answers from user input (support multiple formats)
-
-6. **Storage**: Store answers to `session.intent_context` with `{extracted_keywords, identified_challenges, user_answers, project_context_used}`
-
-**Example Output**:
-```markdown
-===== Phase 1: 项目意图分析 =====
-
-【问题1 - 核心挑战】实时协作平台的主要技术挑战？
-a) 实时数据同步
-   说明：100+用户同时在线，状态同步复杂度高
-b) 可扩展性架构
-   说明：用户规模增长时的系统扩展能力
-c) 冲突解决机制
-   说明：多用户同时编辑的冲突处理策略
-
-【问题2 - 优先级】MVP阶段最关注的指标？
-a) 功能完整性
-   说明：实现所有核心功能
-b) 用户体验
-   说明：流畅的交互体验和响应速度
-c) 系统稳定性
-   说明：高可用性和数据一致性
-
-请回答 (格式: 1a 2b)：
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "实时协作平台的主要技术挑战？",
+      header: "核心挑战",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "实时数据同步", description: "100+用户同时在线，状态同步复杂度高" },
+        { label: "可扩展性架构", description: "用户规模增长时的系统扩展能力" },
+        { label: "冲突解决机制", description: "多用户同时编辑的冲突处理策略" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "MVP阶段最关注的指标？",
+      header: "优先级",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "功能完整性", description: "实现所有核心功能" },
+        { label: "用户体验", description: "流畅的交互体验和响应速度" },
+        { label: "系统稳定性", description: "高可用性和数据一致性" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
 ```
 
-**User input examples**:
-- `1a 2c` → Q1:a, Q2:c
-- `1a,2c` → Q1:a, Q2:c
-
 **⚠️ CRITICAL**: Questions MUST reference topic keywords. Generic "Project type?" violates dynamic generation.
 
 ### Phase 2: Role Selection
 
-**⚠️ CRITICAL**: User MUST interact to select roles. NEVER auto-select without user confirmation.
+**Goal**: User selects roles from intelligent recommendations
 
-**Available Roles**:
-- data-architect (数据架构师)
-- product-manager (产品经理)
-- product-owner (产品负责人)
-- scrum-master (敏捷教练)
-- subject-matter-expert (领域专家)
-- system-architect (系统架构师)
-- test-strategist (测试策略师)
-- ui-designer (UI 设计师)
-- ux-expert (UX 专家)
+**Available Roles**: data-architect, product-manager, product-owner, scrum-master, subject-matter-expert, system-architect, test-strategist, ui-designer, ux-expert
 
 **Steps**:
-1. **Intelligent role recommendation** (AI analysis):
-   - Analyze Phase 1 extracted keywords and challenges
-   - Use AI reasoning to determine most relevant roles for the specific topic
-   - Recommend count+2 roles (e.g., if user wants 3 roles, recommend 5 options)
-   - Provide clear rationale for each recommended role based on topic context
+1. Analyze Phase 1 keywords → Recommend count+2 roles with rationale
+2. AskUserQuestion (multiSelect=true) → Store to `session.selected_roles`
+3. If count+2 > 4, split into multiple rounds
 
-2. **User selection** (text interaction):
-   - Output all recommended roles at once (no batching needed for count+2 roles)
-   - Display roles with labels and relevance rationale
-   - Wait for user input in multi-select format
-   - Parse user input (support multiple formats)
-   - **Storage**: Store selections to `session.selected_roles`
-
-**Example Output**:
-```markdown
-===== Phase 2: 角色选择 =====
-
-【角色选择】请选择 3 个角色参与头脑风暴分析
-
-a) system-architect (系统架构师)
-   推荐理由：实时同步架构设计和技术选型的核心角色
-b) ui-designer (UI设计师)
-   推荐理由：协作界面用户体验和实时状态展示
-c) product-manager (产品经理)
-   推荐理由：功能优先级和MVP范围决策
-d) data-architect (数据架构师)
-   推荐理由：数据同步模型和存储方案设计
-e) ux-expert (UX专家)
-   推荐理由：多用户协作交互流程优化
-
-支持格式：
-- 分别选择：2a 2c 2d (选择a、c、d)
-- 合并语法：2acd (选择a、c、d)
-- 逗号分隔：2a,c,d (选择a、c、d)
-
-请输入选择：
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "请选择 3 个角色参与头脑风暴分析",
+    header: "角色选择",
+    multiSelect: true,
+    options: [
+      { label: "system-architect", description: "实时同步架构设计和技术选型" },
+      { label: "ui-designer", description: "协作界面用户体验和状态展示" },
+      { label: "product-manager", description: "功能优先级和MVP范围决策" },
+      { label: "data-architect", description: "数据同步模型和存储方案设计" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
 ```
 
-**User input examples**:
-- `2acd` → Roles: a, c, d (system-architect, product-manager, data-architect)
-- `2a 2c 2d` → Same result
-- `2a,c,d` → Same result
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: User MUST interact. NEVER auto-select without confirmation.
 
-**Role Recommendation Rules**:
-- NO hardcoded keyword-to-role mappings
-- Use intelligent analysis of topic, challenges, and requirements
-- Consider role synergies and coverage gaps
-- Explain WHY each role is relevant to THIS specific topic
-- Default recommendation: count+2 roles for user to choose from
-
-### Phase 3: Role-Specific Questions (Dynamic Generation)
+### Phase 3: Role-Specific Questions
 
 **Goal**: Generate deep questions mapping role expertise to Phase 1 challenges
 
 **Algorithm**:
-```
-FOR each selected role:
-  1. Map Phase 1 challenges to role domain:
-     - "real-time sync" + system-architect → State management pattern
-     - "100 users" + system-architect → Communication protocol
-     - "low latency" + system-architect → Conflict resolution
+1. FOR each selected role:
+   - Map Phase 1 challenges to role domain
+   - Generate 3-4 questions (implementation depth, trade-offs, edge cases)
+   - AskUserQuestion per role → Store to `session.role_decisions[role]`
+2. Process roles sequentially (one at a time for clarity)
+3. If role needs > 4 questions, split into multiple rounds
 
-  2. Generate 3-4 questions per role probing implementation depth, trade-offs, edge cases:
-     Q: "How handle real-time state sync for 100+ users?" (explores approach)
-     Q: "How resolve conflicts when 2 users edit simultaneously?" (explores edge case)
-     Options: [Event Sourcing/Centralized/CRDT] (concrete, explain trade-offs for THIS use case)
-
-  3. Output questions in text format per role:
-     - Display all questions for current role (3-4 questions, no 10-question limit)
-     - Questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
-     - Wait for user input
-     - Parse answers using intelligent parsing
-     - Store answers to session.role_decisions[role]
+**Example** (system-architect):
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "100+ 用户实时状态同步方案？",
+      header: "状态同步",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Event Sourcing", description: "完整事件历史，支持回溯，存储成本高" },
+        { label: "集中式状态管理", description: "实现简单，单点瓶颈风险" },
+        { label: "CRDT", description: "去中心化，自动合并，学习曲线陡" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "两个用户同时编辑冲突如何解决？",
+      header: "冲突解决",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "自动合并", description: "用户无感知，可能产生意外结果" },
+        { label: "手动解决", description: "用户控制，增加交互复杂度" },
+        { label: "版本控制", description: "保留历史，需要分支管理" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
 ```
 
-**Batching Strategy**:
-- Each role outputs all its questions at once (typically 3-4 questions)
-- No need to split per role (within 10-question batch limit)
-- Multiple roles processed sequentially (one role at a time for clarity)
+### Phase 4: Conflict Resolution
 
-**Output Format**: Follow standard format from "User Interaction Protocol" section (single-choice question format)
-
-**Example Topic-Specific Questions** (system-architect role for "real-time collaboration platform"):
-- "100+ 用户实时状态同步方案?" → Options: Event Sourcing / 集中式状态管理 / CRDT
-- "两个用户同时编辑冲突如何解决?" → Options: 自动合并 / 手动解决 / 版本控制
-- "低延迟通信协议选择?" → Options: WebSocket / SSE / 轮询
-- "系统扩展性架构方案?" → Options: 微服务 / 单体+缓存 / Serverless
-
-**Quality Requirements**: See "Question Generation Guidelines" section for detailed rules
-
-### Phase 4: Cross-Role Clarification (Conflict Detection)
-
-**Goal**: Resolve ACTUAL conflicts from Phase 3 answers, not pre-defined relationships
+**Goal**: Resolve ACTUAL conflicts from Phase 3 answers
 
 **Algorithm**:
-```
 1. Analyze Phase 3 answers for conflicts:
-   - Contradictory choices: product-manager "fast iteration" vs system-architect "complex Event Sourcing"
-   - Missing integration: ui-designer "Optimistic updates" but system-architect didn't address conflict handling
-   - Implicit dependencies: ui-designer "Live cursors" but no auth approach defined
-
-2. FOR each detected conflict:
-   Generate clarification questions referencing SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices
-
-3. Output clarification questions in text format:
-   - Batch conflicts into rounds (max 10 questions per round)
-   - Display questions with context from Phase 3 answers
-   - Questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
-   - Wait for user input
-   - Parse answers using intelligent parsing
-   - Store answers to session.cross_role_decisions
-
+   - Contradictory choices (e.g., "fast iteration" vs "complex Event Sourcing")
+   - Missing integration (e.g., "Optimistic updates" but no conflict handling)
+   - Implicit dependencies (e.g., "Live cursors" but no auth defined)
+2. Generate clarification questions referencing SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices
+3. AskUserQuestion (max 4 per call, multi-round) → Store to `session.cross_role_decisions`
 4. If NO conflicts: Skip Phase 4 (inform user: "未检测到跨角色冲突，跳过Phase 4")
+
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "CRDT 与 UI 回滚期望冲突，如何解决？\n背景：system-architect选择CRDT，ui-designer期望回滚UI",
+    header: "架构冲突",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      { label: "采用 CRDT", description: "保持去中心化，调整UI期望" },
+      { label: "显示合并界面", description: "增加用户交互，展示冲突详情" },
+      { label: "切换到 OT", description: "支持回滚，增加服务器复杂度" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
 ```
 
-**Batching Strategy**:
-- Maximum 10 clarification questions per round
-- If conflicts > 10, split into multiple rounds
-- Prioritize most critical conflicts first
+### Phase 4.5: Final Clarification
 
-**Output Format**: Follow standard format from "User Interaction Protocol" section (single-choice question format with background context)
-
-**Example Conflict Detection** (from Phase 3 answers):
-- **Architecture Conflict**: "CRDT 与 UI 回滚期望冲突，如何解决?"
-  - Background: system-architect chose CRDT, ui-designer expects rollback UI
-  - Options: 采用 CRDT / 显示合并界面 / 切换到 OT
-- **Integration Gap**: "实时光标功能缺少身份认证方案"
-  - Background: ui-designer chose live cursors, no auth defined
-  - Options: OAuth 2.0 / JWT Token / Session-based
-
-**Quality Requirements**: See "Question Generation Guidelines" section for conflict-specific rules
-
-### Phase 5: Generate Guidance Specification
+**Purpose**: Ensure no important points missed before generating specification
 
 **Steps**:
-1. Load all decisions: `intent_context` + `selected_roles` + `role_decisions` + `cross_role_decisions`
-2. Transform Q&A pairs to declarative: Questions → Headers, Answers → CONFIRMED/SELECTED statements
-3. Generate guidance-specification.md (template below) - **PRIMARY OUTPUT FILE**
-4. Update workflow-session.json with **METADATA ONLY**:
-   - session_id (e.g., "WFS-topic-slug")
-   - selected_roles[] (array of role names, e.g., ["system-architect", "ui-designer", "product-manager"])
-   - topic (original user input string)
-   - timestamp (ISO-8601 format)
-   - phase_completed: "artifacts"
-   - count_parameter (number from --count flag)
-5. Validate: No interrogative sentences in .md file, all decisions traceable, no content duplication in .json
+1. Ask initial check:
+   ```javascript
+   AskUserQuestion({
+     questions: [{
+       question: "在生成最终规范之前，是否有前面未澄清的重点需要补充？",
+       header: "补充确认",
+       multiSelect: false,
+       options: [
+         { label: "无需补充", description: "前面的讨论已经足够完整" },
+         { label: "需要补充", description: "还有重要内容需要澄清" }
+       ]
+     }]
+   })
+   ```
+2. If "需要补充":
+   - Analyze user's additional points
+   - Generate progressive questions (not role-bound, interconnected)
+   - AskUserQuestion (max 4 per round) → Store to `session.additional_decisions`
+   - Repeat until user confirms completion
+3. If "无需补充": Proceed to Phase 5
 
-**⚠️ CRITICAL OUTPUT SEPARATION**:
-- **guidance-specification.md**: Full guidance content (decisions, rationale, integration points)
-- **workflow-session.json**: Session metadata ONLY (no guidance content, no decisions, no Q&A pairs)
-- **NO content duplication**: Guidance stays in .md, metadata stays in .json
+**Progressive Pattern**: Questions interconnected, each round informs next, continue until resolved.
 
-## Output Document Template
+### Phase 5: Generate Specification
+
+**Steps**:
+1. Load all decisions: `intent_context` + `selected_roles` + `role_decisions` + `cross_role_decisions` + `additional_decisions`
+2. Transform Q&A to declarative: Questions → Headers, Answers → CONFIRMED/SELECTED statements
+3. Generate `guidance-specification.md`
+4. Update `workflow-session.json` (metadata only)
+5. Validate: No interrogative sentences, all decisions traceable
+
+---
+
+## Question Guidelines
+
+### Core Principle
+
+**Target**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
+
+**Question Structure**: `[业务场景/需求前提] + [技术关注点]`
+**Option Structure**: `标签：[技术方案] + 说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]`
+
+### Quality Rules
+
+**MUST Include**:
+- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+- ✅ 业务场景作为问题前提
+- ✅ 技术选项的业务影响说明
+- ✅ 量化指标和约束条件
+
+**MUST Avoid**:
+- ❌ 纯技术选型无业务上下文
+- ❌ 过度抽象的用户体验问题
+- ❌ 脱离话题的通用架构问题
+
+### Phase-Specific Requirements
+
+| Phase | Focus | Key Requirements |
+|-------|-------|------------------|
+| 1 | 意图理解 | Reference topic keywords, 用户场景、业务约束、优先级 |
+| 2 | 角色推荐 | Intelligent analysis (NOT keyword mapping), explain relevance |
+| 3 | 角色问题 | Reference Phase 1 keywords, concrete options with trade-offs |
+| 4 | 冲突解决 | Reference SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices, explain impact on both roles |
+
+---
+
+## Output & Governance
+
+### Output Template
 
 **File**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md`
 
@@ -478,9 +386,9 @@ FOR each selected role:
 
 ## Next Steps
 **⚠️ Automatic Continuation** (when called from auto-parallel):
-- auto-parallel will assign agents to generate role-specific analysis documents
-- Each selected role gets dedicated conceptual-planning-agent
-- Agents read this guidance-specification.md for framework context
+- auto-parallel assigns agents for role-specific analysis
+- Each selected role gets conceptual-planning-agent
+- Agents read this guidance-specification.md for context
 
 ## Appendix: Decision Tracking
 | Decision ID | Category | Question | Selected | Phase | Rationale |
@@ -490,95 +398,19 @@ FOR each selected role:
 | D-003+ | [Role] | [Q] | [A] | 3 | [Why] |
 ```
 
-## Question Generation Guidelines
-
-### Core Principle: Developer-Facing Questions with User Context
-
-**Target Audience**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
-
-**Generation Philosophy**:
-1. **Phase 1**: 用户场景、业务约束、优先级（建立上下文）
-2. **Phase 2**: 基于话题分析的智能角色推荐（非关键词映射）
-3. **Phase 3**: 业务需求 + 技术选型（需求驱动的技术决策）
-4. **Phase 4**: 技术冲突的业务权衡（帮助开发者理解影响）
-
-### Universal Quality Rules
-
-**Question Structure** (all phases):
-```
-[业务场景/需求前提] + [技术关注点]
-```
-
-**Option Structure** (all phases):
-```
-标签：[技术方案简称] + (业务特征)
-说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]
-```
-
-**MUST Include** (all phases):
-- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
-- ✅ 业务场景作为问题前提
-- ✅ 技术选项的业务影响说明
-- ✅ 量化指标和约束条件
-
-**MUST Avoid** (all phases):
-- ❌ 纯技术选型无业务上下文
-- ❌ 过度抽象的用户体验问题
-- ❌ 脱离话题的通用架构问题
-
-### Phase-Specific Requirements
-
-**Phase 1 Requirements**:
-- Questions MUST reference topic keywords (NOT generic "Project type?")
-- Focus: 用户使用场景（谁用？怎么用？多频繁？）、业务约束（预算、时间、团队、合规）
-- Success metrics: 性能指标、用户体验目标
-- Priority ranking: MVP vs 长期规划
-
-**Phase 3 Requirements**:
-- Questions MUST reference Phase 1 keywords (e.g., "real-time", "100 users")
-- Options MUST be concrete approaches with relevance to topic
-- Each option includes trade-offs specific to this use case
-- Include 业务需求驱动的技术问题、量化指标（并发数、延迟、可用性）
-
-**Phase 4 Requirements**:
-- Questions MUST reference SPECIFIC Phase 3 choices in background context
-- Options address the detected conflict directly
-- Each option explains impact on both conflicting roles
-- NEVER use static "Cross-Role Matrix" - ALWAYS analyze actual Phase 3 answers
-- Focus: 技术冲突的业务权衡、帮助开发者理解不同选择的影响
-
-## Validation Checklist
-
-Generated guidance-specification.md MUST:
-- ✅ No interrogative sentences (use CONFIRMED/SELECTED)
-- ✅ Every decision traceable to user answer
-- ✅ Cross-role conflicts resolved or documented
-- ✅ Next steps concrete and specific
-- ✅ All Phase 1-4 decisions in session metadata
-
-## Update Mechanism
+### File Structure
 
 ```
-IF guidance-specification.md EXISTS:
-  Prompt: "Regenerate completely / Update sections / Cancel"
-ELSE:
-  Run full Phase 1-5 flow
+.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/
+├── workflow-session.json              # Metadata ONLY
+├── .process/
+│   └── context-package.json           # Phase 0 output
+└── .brainstorming/
+    └── guidance-specification.md      # Full guidance content
 ```
 
-## Governance Rules
+### Session Metadata
 
-**Output Requirements**:
-- All decisions MUST use CONFIRMED/SELECTED (NO "?" in decision sections)
-- Every decision MUST trace to user answer
-- Conflicts MUST be resolved (not marked "TBD")
-- Next steps MUST be actionable
-- Topic preserved as authoritative reference in session
-
-**CRITICAL**: Guidance is single source of truth for downstream phases. Ambiguity violates governance.
-
-## Storage Validation
-
-**workflow-session.json** (metadata only):
 ```json
 {
   "session_id": "WFS-{topic-slug}",
@@ -591,14 +423,31 @@ ELSE:
 }
 ```
 
-**⚠️ Rule**: Session JSON stores ONLY metadata (session_id, selected_roles[], topic, timestamps). All guidance content goes to guidance-specification.md.
+**⚠️ Rule**: Session JSON stores ONLY metadata. All guidance content goes to guidance-specification.md.
 
-## File Structure
+### Validation Checklist
+
+- ✅ No interrogative sentences (use CONFIRMED/SELECTED)
+- ✅ Every decision traceable to user answer
+- ✅ Cross-role conflicts resolved or documented
+- ✅ Next steps concrete and specific
+- ✅ No content duplication between .json and .md
+
+### Update Mechanism
 
 ```
-.workflow/active/WFS-[topic]/
-├── workflow-session.json              # Session metadata ONLY
-└── .brainstorming/
-    └── guidance-specification.md      # Full guidance content
+IF guidance-specification.md EXISTS:
+  Prompt: "Regenerate completely / Update sections / Cancel"
+ELSE:
+  Run full Phase 0-5 flow
 ```
 
+### Governance Rules
+
+- All decisions MUST use CONFIRMED/SELECTED (NO "?" in decision sections)
+- Every decision MUST trace to user answer
+- Conflicts MUST be resolved (not marked "TBD")
+- Next steps MUST be actionable
+- Topic preserved as authoritative reference
+
+**CRITICAL**: Guidance is single source of truth for downstream phases. Ambiguity violates governance.

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/auto-parallel.md

@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 3 phases in sequence (interactive framework → parallel role analysis → synthesis), coordinating specialized commands/agents through task attachment model.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Executes 3 phases in sequence (interactive framework → parallel role analysis → synthesis), coordinating specialized commands/agents through task attachment model.
 
 **Task Attachment Model**:
-- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
-- Task agent execution **attaches analysis tasks** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- SlashCommand execute **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- Task agent execute **attaches analysis tasks** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
 - Phase 1: artifacts command attaches its internal tasks (Phase 1-5)
 - Phase 2: N conceptual-planning-agent tasks attached in parallel
 - Phase 3: synthesis command attaches its internal tasks
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), Task(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*
 This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 1 (artifacts) handles user interaction, Phase 2 (role agents) runs in parallel.
 
 1. **User triggers**: `/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel "topic" [--count N]`
-2. **Phase 1 executes** → artifacts command (tasks ATTACHED) → Auto-continues
-3. **Phase 2 executes** → Parallel role agents (N tasks ATTACHED concurrently) → Auto-continues
-4. **Phase 3 executes** → Synthesis command (tasks ATTACHED) → Reports final summary
+2. **Execute Phase 1** → artifacts command (tasks ATTACHED) → Auto-continues
+3. **Execute Phase 2** → Parallel role agents (N tasks ATTACHED concurrently) → Auto-continues
+4. **Execute Phase 3** → Synthesis command (tasks ATTACHED) → Reports final summary
 
 **Auto-Continue Mechanism**:
 - TodoList tracks current phase status and dynamically manages task attachment/collapse
@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 1 (artifacts) ha
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 command execution
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is execute Phase 1 command
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not analyze topic before Phase 1 - artifacts handles all analysis
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract selected_roles from workflow-session.json after Phase 1
 4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
 5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
-6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand and Task invocations **attach** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand and Task executes **attach** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
 7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 8. **Parallel Execution**: Phase 2 attaches multiple agent tasks simultaneously for concurrent execution
 
@@ -67,7 +67,11 @@ This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 1 (artifacts) ha
 
 ### Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation
 
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"{topic}\" --count {N}")`
+**Step 1: Execute** - Interactive framework generation via artifacts command
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts \"{topic}\" --count {N}")
+```
 
 **What It Does**:
 - Topic analysis: Extract challenges, generate task-specific questions
@@ -87,31 +91,32 @@ This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 1 (artifacts) ha
 - workflow-session.json contains selected_roles[] (metadata only, no content duplication)
 - Session directory `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/` exists
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1.1: Topic analysis and question generation (artifacts)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing topic"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1.2: Role selection and user confirmation (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Selecting roles"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1.3: Role questions and user decisions (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Collecting role questions"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1.4: Conflict detection and resolution (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
-  {"content": "Phase 1.5: Guidance specification generation (artifacts)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating guidance"},
-  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "  → Topic analysis and question generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing topic"},
+  {"content": "  → Role selection and user confirmation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Selecting roles"},
+  {"content": "  → Role questions and user decisions", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Collecting role questions"},
+  {"content": "  → Conflict detection and resolution", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Guidance specification generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating guidance"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** artifacts' 5 internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** artifacts' 5 internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 1.1-1.5** sequentially
 
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 1 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
-  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
-  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -136,26 +141,10 @@ OUTPUT_LOCATION: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/{role}/
 TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
 
 ## Flow Control Steps
-1. **load_topic_framework**
-   - Action: Load structured topic discussion framework
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md)
-   - Output: topic_framework_content
-
-2. **load_role_template**
-   - Action: Load {role-name} planning template
-   - Command: Read(~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md)
-   - Output: role_template_guidelines
-
-3. **load_session_metadata**
-   - Action: Load session metadata and original user intent
-   - Command: Read(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json)
-   - Output: session_context (contains original user prompt as PRIMARY reference)
-
-4. **load_style_skill** (ONLY for ui-designer role when style_skill_package exists)
-   - Action: Load style SKILL package for design system reference
-   - Command: Read(.claude/skills/style-{style_skill_package}/SKILL.md) AND Read(.workflow/reference_style/{style_skill_package}/design-tokens.json)
-   - Output: style_skill_content, design_tokens
-   - Usage: Apply design tokens in ui-designer analysis and artifacts
+1. load_topic_framework → .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md
+2. load_role_template → ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/planning-roles/{role}.md
+3. load_session_metadata → .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/workflow-session.json
+4. load_style_skill (ui-designer only, if style_skill_package) → .claude/skills/style-{style_skill_package}/
 
 ## Analysis Requirements
 **Primary Reference**: Original user prompt from workflow-session.json is authoritative
@@ -165,13 +154,9 @@ TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
 **Template Integration**: Apply role template guidelines within framework structure
 
 ## Expected Deliverables
-1. **analysis.md**: Comprehensive {role-name} analysis addressing all framework discussion points
-   - **File Naming**: MUST start with `analysis` prefix (e.g., `analysis.md`, `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md`)
-   - **FORBIDDEN**: Never use `recommendations.md` or any filename not starting with `analysis`
-   - **Auto-split if large**: If content >800 lines, split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md)
-   - **Content**: Includes both analysis AND recommendations sections within analysis files
-2. **Framework Reference**: Include @../guidance-specification.md reference in analysis
-3. **User Intent Alignment**: Validate analysis aligns with original user objectives from session_context
+1. **analysis.md** (optionally with analysis-{slug}.md sub-documents)
+2. **Framework Reference**: @../guidance-specification.md
+3. **User Intent Alignment**: Validate against session_context
 
 ## Completion Criteria
 - Address each discussion point from guidance-specification.md with {role-name} expertise
@@ -182,7 +167,7 @@ TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
 "
 ```
 
-**Parallel Execution**:
+**Parallel Execute**:
 - Launch N agents simultaneously (one message with multiple Task calls)
 - Each agent task **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
 - All agents execute concurrently, each attaching their own analysis sub-tasks
@@ -194,35 +179,36 @@ TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
 - guidance-specification.md path
 
 **Validation**:
-- Each role creates `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/analysis.md` (primary file)
-- If content is large (>800 lines), may split to `analysis-1.md`, `analysis-2.md` (max 3 files total)
-- **File naming pattern**: ALL files MUST start with `analysis` prefix (use `analysis*.md` for globbing)
-- **FORBIDDEN naming**: No `recommendations.md`, `recommendations-*.md`, or any non-`analysis` prefixed files
+- Each role creates `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/{role}/analysis.md`
+- Optionally with `analysis-{slug}.md` sub-documents (max 5)
+- **File pattern**: `analysis*.md` for globbing
+- **FORBIDDEN**: `recommendations.md` or any non-`analysis` prefixed files
 - All N role analyses completed
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 agents invoked - tasks attached in parallel)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 agents executed - tasks attached in parallel)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
-  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Execute system-architect analysis [conceptual-planning-agent]", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Execute ui-designer analysis [conceptual-planning-agent]", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2.3: Execute product-manager analysis [conceptual-planning-agent]", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing product-manager analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Execute system-architect analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing system-architect analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Execute ui-designer analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing ui-designer analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Execute product-manager analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing product-manager analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: Multiple Task invocations **attach** N role analysis tasks simultaneously. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks in parallel.
+**Note**: Multiple Task executes **attach** N role analysis tasks simultaneously. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks in parallel.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.1-2.N** concurrently
 
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
-  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
-  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -234,7 +220,11 @@ TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
 
 ### Phase 3: Synthesis Generation
 
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis --session {sessionId}")`
+**Step 3: Execute** - Synthesis integration via synthesis command
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis --session {sessionId}")
+```
 
 **What It Does**:
 - Load original user intent from workflow-session.json
@@ -248,29 +238,30 @@ TOPIC: {user-provided-topic}
 - `.workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md` exists
 - Synthesis references all role analyses
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
-  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
-  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Load role analysis files (synthesis)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading role analyses"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Integrate insights across roles (synthesis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Integrating insights"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Generate synthesis specification (synthesis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis"}
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"},
+  {"content": "  → Load role analysis files", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading role analyses"},
+  {"content": "  → Integrate insights across roles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Integrating insights"},
+  {"content": "  → Generate synthesis specification", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** synthesis' internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** synthesis' internal tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
 
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Parse --count parameter from user input", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
-  {"content": "Execute artifacts interactive framework generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
-  {"content": "Execute parallel role analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute synthesis integration", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
+  {"content": "Phase 0: Parameter Parsing", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Parsing count parameter"},
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Interactive Framework Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing artifacts interactive framework"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Parallel Role Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing parallel role analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Synthesis Integration", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing synthesis integration"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -293,7 +284,7 @@ Synthesis: .workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.m
 
 ### Key Principles
 
-1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand/Task invoked):
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand/Task executed):
    - Sub-command's or agent's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
    - Phase 1: `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` attaches 5 internal tasks (Phase 1.1-1.5)
    - Phase 2: Multiple `Task(conceptual-planning-agent)` calls attach N role analysis tasks simultaneously
@@ -314,7 +305,7 @@ Synthesis: .workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.m
    - No user intervention required between phases
    - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
 
-**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase 1 invoked (artifacts tasks ATTACHED) → Artifacts sub-tasks executed → Phase 1 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 2 invoked (N role tasks ATTACHED in parallel) → Role analyses executed concurrently → Phase 2 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 3 invoked (synthesis tasks ATTACHED) → Synthesis sub-tasks executed → Phase 3 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Workflow complete.
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase 1 executed (artifacts tasks ATTACHED) → Artifacts sub-tasks executed → Phase 1 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 2 executed (N role tasks ATTACHED in parallel) → Role analyses executed concurrently → Phase 2 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Phase 3 executed (synthesis tasks ATTACHED) → Synthesis sub-tasks executed → Phase 3 completed (tasks COLLAPSED) → Workflow complete.
 
 ### Brainstorming Workflow Specific Features
 
@@ -324,14 +315,6 @@ Synthesis: .workflow/active/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.m
 - **Dynamic Role Count**: `--count N` parameter determines number of Phase 2 parallel tasks (default: 3, max: 9)
 - **Mixed Execution**: Sequential (Phase 1, 3) and Parallel (Phase 2) task execution
 
-**Benefits**:
-- Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
-- Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
-- Clear mental model: SlashCommand/Task = attach tasks, not delegate work
-- Parallel execution support for concurrent role analysis
-- Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
-
-**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 1, 2, 3) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
 
 ## Input Processing
 
@@ -450,12 +433,9 @@ CONTEXT_VARS:
 ├── workflow-session.json              # Session metadata ONLY
 └── .brainstorming/
     ├── guidance-specification.md      # Framework (Phase 1)
-    ├── {role-1}/
-    │   └── analysis.md                # Role analysis (Phase 2)
-    ├── {role-2}/
-    │   └── analysis.md
-    ├── {role-N}/
-    │   └── analysis.md
+    ├── {role}/
+    │   ├── analysis.md                # Main document (with optional @references)
+    │   └── analysis-{slug}.md         # Section documents (max 5)
     └── synthesis-specification.md     # Integration (Phase 3)
 ```
 

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md

@@ -2,325 +2,318 @@
 name: synthesis
 description: Clarify and refine role analyses through intelligent Q&A and targeted updates with synthesis agent
 argument-hint: "[optional: --session session-id]"
-allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), Glob(*)
+allowed-tools: Task(conceptual-planning-agent), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Edit(*), Glob(*), AskUserQuestion(*)
 ---
 
 ## Overview
 
-Three-phase workflow to eliminate ambiguities and enhance conceptual depth in role analyses:
+Six-phase workflow to eliminate ambiguities and enhance conceptual depth in role analyses:
 
-**Phase 1-2 (Main Flow)**: Session detection → File discovery → Path preparation
+**Phase 1-2**: Session detection → File discovery → Path preparation
+**Phase 3A**: Cross-role analysis agent → Generate recommendations
+**Phase 4**: User selects enhancements → User answers clarifications (via AskUserQuestion)
+**Phase 5**: Parallel update agents (one per role)
+**Phase 6**: Context package update → Metadata update → Completion report
 
-**Phase 3A (Analysis Agent)**: Cross-role analysis → Generate recommendations
-
-**Phase 4 (Main Flow)**: User selects enhancements → User answers clarifications → Build update plan
-
-**Phase 5 (Parallel Update Agents)**: Each agent updates ONE role document → Parallel execution
-
-**Phase 6 (Main Flow)**: Metadata update → Completion report
-
-**Key Features**:
-- Multi-agent architecture (analysis agent + parallel update agents)
-- Clear separation: Agent analysis vs Main flow interaction
-- Parallel document updates (one agent per role)
-- User intent alignment validation
+All user interactions use AskUserQuestion tool (max 4 questions per call, multi-round).
 
 **Document Flow**:
 - Input: `[role]/analysis*.md`, `guidance-specification.md`, session metadata
 - Output: Updated `[role]/analysis*.md` with Enhancements + Clarifications sections
 
+---
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+### Phase Summary
+
+| Phase | Goal | Executor | Output |
+|-------|------|----------|--------|
+| 1 | Session detection | Main flow | session_id, brainstorm_dir |
+| 2 | File discovery | Main flow | role_analysis_paths |
+| 3A | Cross-role analysis | Agent | enhancement_recommendations |
+| 4 | User interaction | Main flow + AskUserQuestion | update_plan |
+| 5 | Document updates | Parallel agents | Updated analysis*.md |
+| 6 | Finalization | Main flow | context-package.json, report |
+
+### AskUserQuestion Pattern
+
+```javascript
+// Enhancement selection (multi-select)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "请选择要应用的改进建议",
+    header: "改进选择",
+    multiSelect: true,
+    options: [
+      { label: "EP-001: API Contract", description: "添加详细的请求/响应 schema 定义" },
+      { label: "EP-002: User Intent", description: "明确用户需求优先级和验收标准" }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+
+// Clarification questions (single-select, multi-round)
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "MVP 阶段的核心目标是什么？",
+      header: "用户意图",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "快速验证", description: "最小功能集，快速上线获取反馈" },
+        { label: "技术壁垒", description: "完善架构，为长期发展打基础" },
+        { label: "功能完整", description: "覆盖所有规划功能，延迟上线" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+---
+
 ## Task Tracking
 
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Detect session and validate analyses", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting session"},
+  {"content": "Detect session and validate analyses", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Detecting session"},
   {"content": "Discover role analysis file paths", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Discovering paths"},
-  {"content": "Execute analysis agent (cross-role analysis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing analysis agent"},
-  {"content": "Present enhancements for user selection", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting enhancements"},
-  {"content": "Generate and present clarification questions", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Clarifying with user"},
-  {"content": "Build update plan from user input", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Building update plan"},
-  {"content": "Execute parallel update agents (one per role)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating documents in parallel"},
-  {"content": "Update session metadata and generate report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Finalizing session"}
+  {"content": "Execute analysis agent (cross-role analysis)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing analysis"},
+  {"content": "Present enhancements via AskUserQuestion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Selecting enhancements"},
+  {"content": "Clarification questions via AskUserQuestion", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Clarifying"},
+  {"content": "Execute parallel update agents", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Updating documents"},
+  {"content": "Update context package and metadata", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Finalizing"}
 ]
 ```
 
+---
+
 ## Execution Phases
 
 ### Phase 1: Discovery & Validation
 
-1. **Detect Session**: Use `--session` parameter or find `.workflow/active/WFS-*` directories
+1. **Detect Session**: Use `--session` parameter or find `.workflow/active/WFS-*`
 2. **Validate Files**:
    - `guidance-specification.md` (optional, warn if missing)
    - `*/analysis*.md` (required, error if empty)
-3. **Load User Intent**: Extract from `workflow-session.json` (project/description field)
+3. **Load User Intent**: Extract from `workflow-session.json`
 
 ### Phase 2: Role Discovery & Path Preparation
 
 **Main flow prepares file paths for Agent**:
 
 1. **Discover Analysis Files**:
-   - Glob(.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md)
-   - Supports: analysis.md, analysis-1.md, analysis-2.md, analysis-3.md
-   - Validate: At least one file exists (error if empty)
+   - Glob: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/*/analysis*.md`
+   - Supports: analysis.md + analysis-{slug}.md (max 5)
 
 2. **Extract Role Information**:
-   - `role_analysis_paths`: Relative paths from brainstorm_dir
-   - `participating_roles`: Role names extracted from directory paths
+   - `role_analysis_paths`: Relative paths
+   - `participating_roles`: Role names from directories
 
-3. **Pass to Agent** (Phase 3):
-   - `session_id`
-   - `brainstorm_dir`: .workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
-   - `role_analysis_paths`: ["product-manager/analysis.md", "system-architect/analysis-1.md", ...]
-   - `participating_roles`: ["product-manager", "system-architect", ...]
-
-**Main Flow Responsibility**: File discovery and path preparation only (NO file content reading)
+3. **Pass to Agent**: session_id, brainstorm_dir, role_analysis_paths, participating_roles
 
 ### Phase 3A: Analysis & Enhancement Agent
 
-**First agent call**: Cross-role analysis and generate enhancement recommendations
+**Agent executes cross-role analysis**:
 
-```bash
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+```javascript
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent, `
 ## Agent Mission
-Analyze role documents, identify conflicts/gaps, and generate enhancement recommendations
+Analyze role documents, identify conflicts/gaps, generate enhancement recommendations
 
-## Input from Main Flow
-- brainstorm_dir: {brainstorm_dir}
-- role_analysis_paths: {role_analysis_paths}
-- participating_roles: {participating_roles}
+## Input
+- brainstorm_dir: ${brainstorm_dir}
+- role_analysis_paths: ${role_analysis_paths}
+- participating_roles: ${participating_roles}
 
-## Execution Instructions
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. load_session_metadata → Read workflow-session.json
+2. load_role_analyses → Read all analysis files
+3. cross_role_analysis → Identify consensus, conflicts, gaps, ambiguities
+4. generate_recommendations → Format as EP-001, EP-002, ...
 
-### Flow Control Steps
-**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these analysis steps sequentially with context accumulation:
-
-1. **load_session_metadata**
-   - Action: Load original user intent as primary reference
-   - Command: Read({brainstorm_dir}/../workflow-session.json)
-   - Output: original_user_intent (from project/description field)
-
-2. **load_role_analyses**
-   - Action: Load all role analysis documents
-   - Command: For each path in role_analysis_paths: Read({brainstorm_dir}/{path})
-   - Output: role_analyses_content_map = {role_name: content}
-
-3. **cross_role_analysis**
-   - Action: Identify consensus themes, conflicts, gaps, underspecified areas
-   - Output: consensus_themes, conflicting_views, gaps_list, ambiguities
-
-4. **generate_recommendations**
-   - Action: Convert cross-role analysis findings into structured enhancement recommendations
-   - Format: EP-001, EP-002, ... (sequential numbering)
-   - Fields: id, title, affected_roles, category, current_state, enhancement, rationale, priority
-   - Taxonomy: Map to 9 categories (User Intent, Requirements, Architecture, UX, Feasibility, Risk, Process, Decisions, Terminology)
-   - Output: enhancement_recommendations (JSON array)
-
-### Output to Main Flow
-Return JSON array:
+## Output Format
 [
   {
-    \"id\": \"EP-001\",
-    \"title\": \"API Contract Specification\",
-    \"affected_roles\": [\"system-architect\", \"api-designer\"],
-    \"category\": \"Architecture\",
-    \"current_state\": \"High-level API descriptions\",
-    \"enhancement\": \"Add detailed contract definitions with request/response schemas\",
-    \"rationale\": \"Enables precise implementation and testing\",
-    \"priority\": \"High\"
-  },
-  ...
+    "id": "EP-001",
+    "title": "API Contract Specification",
+    "affected_roles": ["system-architect", "api-designer"],
+    "category": "Architecture",
+    "current_state": "High-level API descriptions",
+    "enhancement": "Add detailed contract definitions",
+    "rationale": "Enables precise implementation",
+    "priority": "High"
+  }
 ]
-
-"
+`)
 ```
 
-### Phase 4: Main Flow User Interaction
+### Phase 4: User Interaction
 
-**Main flow handles all user interaction via text output**:
+**All interactions via AskUserQuestion (Chinese questions)**
 
-**⚠️ CRITICAL**: ALL questions MUST use Chinese (所有问题必须用中文) for better user understanding
+#### Step 1: Enhancement Selection
 
-1. **Present Enhancement Options** (multi-select):
-```markdown
-===== Enhancement 选择 =====
+```javascript
+// If enhancements > 4, split into multiple rounds
+const enhancements = [...]; // from Phase 3A
+const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
 
-请选择要应用的改进建议（可多选）：
+for (let i = 0; i < enhancements.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+  const batch = enhancements.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
 
-a) EP-001: API Contract Specification
-   影响角色：system-architect, api-designer
-   说明：添加详细的请求/响应 schema 定义
+  AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: `请选择要应用的改进建议 (第${Math.floor(i/BATCH_SIZE)+1}轮)`,
+      header: "改进选择",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: batch.map(ep => ({
+        label: `${ep.id}: ${ep.title}`,
+        description: `影响: ${ep.affected_roles.join(', ')} | ${ep.enhancement}`
+      }))
+    }]
+  })
 
-b) EP-002: User Intent Validation
-   影响角色：product-manager, ux-expert
-   说明：明确用户需求优先级和验收标准
+  // Store selections before next round
+}
 
-c) EP-003: Error Handling Strategy
-   影响角色：system-architect
-   说明：统一异常处理和降级方案
-
-支持格式：1abc 或 1a 1b 1c 或 1a,b,c
-请输入选择（可跳过输入 skip）：
+// User can also skip: provide "跳过" option
 ```
 
-2. **Generate Clarification Questions** (based on analysis agent output):
-   - ✅ **ALL questions in Chinese (所有问题必须用中文)**
-   - Use 9-category taxonomy scan results
-   - Prioritize most critical questions (no hard limit)
-   - Each with 2-4 options + descriptions
+#### Step 2: Clarification Questions
 
-3. **Interactive Clarification Loop** (max 10 questions per round):
-```markdown
-===== Clarification 问题 (第 1/2 轮) =====
+```javascript
+// Generate questions based on 9-category taxonomy scan
+// Categories: User Intent, Requirements, Architecture, UX, Feasibility, Risk, Process, Decisions, Terminology
 
-【问题1 - 用户意图】MVP 阶段的核心目标是什么？
-a) 快速验证市场需求
-   说明：最小功能集，快速上线获取反馈
-b) 建立技术壁垒
-   说明：完善架构，为长期发展打基础
-c) 实现功能完整性
-   说明：覆盖所有规划功能，延迟上线
+const clarifications = [...]; // from analysis
+const BATCH_SIZE = 4;
 
-【问题2 - 架构决策】技术栈选择的优先考虑因素？
-a) 团队熟悉度
-   说明：使用现有技术栈，降低学习成本
-b) 技术先进性
-   说明：采用新技术，提升竞争力
-c) 生态成熟度
-   说明：选择成熟方案，保证稳定性
+for (let i = 0; i < clarifications.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+  const batch = clarifications.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
+  const currentRound = Math.floor(i / BATCH_SIZE) + 1;
+  const totalRounds = Math.ceil(clarifications.length / BATCH_SIZE);
 
-...（最多10个问题）
+  AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: batch.map(q => ({
+      question: q.question,
+      header: q.category.substring(0, 12),
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: q.options.map(opt => ({
+        label: opt.label,
+        description: opt.description
+      }))
+    }))
+  })
 
-请回答 (格式: 1a 2b 3c...)：
+  // Store answers before next round
+}
 ```
 
-Wait for user input → Parse all answers in batch → Continue to next round if needed
+### Question Guidelines
 
-4. **Build Update Plan**:
-```
+**Target**: 开发者（理解技术但需要从用户需求出发）
+
+**Question Structure**: `[跨角色分析发现] + [需要澄清的决策点]`
+**Option Structure**: `标签：[具体方案] + 说明：[业务影响] + [技术权衡]`
+
+**9-Category Taxonomy**:
+
+| Category | Focus | Example Question Pattern |
+|----------|-------|--------------------------|
+| User Intent | 用户目标 | "MVP阶段核心目标？" + 验证/壁垒/完整性 |
+| Requirements | 需求细化 | "功能优先级如何排序？" + 核心/增强/可选 |
+| Architecture | 架构决策 | "技术栈选择考量？" + 熟悉度/先进性/成熟度 |
+| UX | 用户体验 | "交互复杂度取舍？" + 简洁/丰富/渐进 |
+| Feasibility | 可行性 | "资源约束下的范围？" + 最小/标准/完整 |
+| Risk | 风险管理 | "风险容忍度？" + 保守/平衡/激进 |
+| Process | 流程规范 | "迭代节奏？" + 快速/稳定/灵活 |
+| Decisions | 决策确认 | "冲突解决方案？" + 方案A/方案B/折中 |
+| Terminology | 术语统一 | "统一使用哪个术语？" + 术语A/术语B |
+
+**Quality Rules**:
+
+**MUST Include**:
+- ✅ All questions in Chinese (用中文提问)
+- ✅ 基于跨角色分析的具体发现
+- ✅ 选项包含业务影响说明
+- ✅ 解决实际的模糊点或冲突
+
+**MUST Avoid**:
+- ❌ 与角色分析无关的通用问题
+- ❌ 重复已在 artifacts 阶段确认的内容
+- ❌ 过于细节的实现级问题
+
+#### Step 3: Build Update Plan
+
+```javascript
 update_plan = {
   "role1": {
-    "enhancements": [EP-001, EP-003],
+    "enhancements": ["EP-001", "EP-003"],
     "clarifications": [
-      {"question": "...", "answer": "...", "category": "..."},
-      ...
+      {"question": "...", "answer": "...", "category": "..."}
     ]
   },
   "role2": {
-    "enhancements": [EP-002],
+    "enhancements": ["EP-002"],
     "clarifications": [...]
-  },
-  ...
+  }
 }
 ```
 
 ### Phase 5: Parallel Document Update Agents
 
-**Parallel agent calls** (one per role needing updates):
+**Execute in parallel** (one agent per role):
 
-```bash
-# Execute in parallel using single message with multiple Task calls
-
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
+```javascript
+// Single message with multiple Task calls for parallelism
+Task(conceptual-planning-agent, `
 ## Agent Mission
-Apply user-confirmed enhancements and clarifications to {role1} analysis document
+Apply enhancements and clarifications to ${role} analysis
 
-## Agent Intent
-- **Goal**: Integrate synthesis results into role-specific analysis
-- **Scope**: Update ONLY {role1}/analysis.md (isolated, no cross-role dependencies)
-- **Constraints**: Preserve original insights, add refinements without deletion
+## Input
+- role: ${role}
+- analysis_path: ${brainstorm_dir}/${role}/analysis.md
+- enhancements: ${role_enhancements}
+- clarifications: ${role_clarifications}
+- original_user_intent: ${intent}
 
-## Input from Main Flow
-- role: {role1}
-- analysis_path: {brainstorm_dir}/{role1}/analysis.md
-- enhancements: [EP-001, EP-003] (user-selected improvements)
-- clarifications: [{question, answer, category}, ...] (user-confirmed answers)
-- original_user_intent: {from session metadata}
+## Flow Control Steps
+1. load_current_analysis → Read analysis file
+2. add_clarifications_section → Insert Q&A section
+3. apply_enhancements → Integrate into relevant sections
+4. resolve_contradictions → Remove conflicts
+5. enforce_terminology → Align terminology
+6. validate_intent → Verify alignment with user intent
+7. write_updated_file → Save changes
 
-## Execution Instructions
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-### Flow Control Steps
-**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute these update steps sequentially:
-
-1. **load_current_analysis**
-   - Action: Load existing role analysis document
-   - Command: Read({brainstorm_dir}/{role1}/analysis.md)
-   - Output: current_analysis_content
-
-2. **add_clarifications_section**
-   - Action: Insert Clarifications section with Q&A
-   - Format: \"## Clarifications\\n### Session {date}\\n- **Q**: {question} (Category: {category})\\n  **A**: {answer}\"
-   - Output: analysis_with_clarifications
-
-3. **apply_enhancements**
-   - Action: Integrate EP-001, EP-003 into relevant sections
-   - Strategy: Locate section by category (Architecture → Architecture section, UX → User Experience section)
-   - Output: analysis_with_enhancements
-
-4. **resolve_contradictions**
-   - Action: Remove conflicts between original content and clarifications/enhancements
-   - Output: contradiction_free_analysis
-
-5. **enforce_terminology_consistency**
-   - Action: Align all terminology with user-confirmed choices from clarifications
-   - Output: terminology_consistent_analysis
-
-6. **validate_user_intent_alignment**
-   - Action: Verify all updates support original_user_intent
-   - Output: validated_analysis
-
-7. **write_updated_file**
-   - Action: Save final analysis document
-   - Command: Write({brainstorm_dir}/{role1}/analysis.md, validated_analysis)
-   - Output: File update confirmation
-
-### Output
-Updated {role1}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
-")
-
-Task(conceptual-planning-agent): "
-## Agent Mission
-Apply user-confirmed enhancements and clarifications to {role2} analysis document
-
-## Agent Intent
-- **Goal**: Integrate synthesis results into role-specific analysis
-- **Scope**: Update ONLY {role2}/analysis.md (isolated, no cross-role dependencies)
-- **Constraints**: Preserve original insights, add refinements without deletion
-
-## Input from Main Flow
-- role: {role2}
-- analysis_path: {brainstorm_dir}/{role2}/analysis.md
-- enhancements: [EP-002] (user-selected improvements)
-- clarifications: [{question, answer, category}, ...] (user-confirmed answers)
-- original_user_intent: {from session metadata}
-
-## Execution Instructions
-[FLOW_CONTROL]
-
-### Flow Control Steps
-**AGENT RESPONSIBILITY**: Execute same 7 update steps as {role1} agent (load → clarifications → enhancements → contradictions → terminology → validation → write)
-
-### Output
-Updated {role2}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
-")
-
-# ... repeat for each role in update_plan
+## Output
+Updated ${role}/analysis.md
+`)
 ```
 
 **Agent Characteristics**:
-- **Intent**: Integrate user-confirmed synthesis results (NOT generate new analysis)
-- **Isolation**: Each agent updates exactly ONE role (parallel execution safe)
-- **Context**: Minimal - receives only role-specific enhancements + clarifications
-- **Dependencies**: Zero cross-agent dependencies (full parallelism)
+- **Isolation**: Each agent updates exactly ONE role (parallel safe)
+- **Dependencies**: Zero cross-agent dependencies
 - **Validation**: All updates must align with original_user_intent
 
-### Phase 6: Completion & Metadata Update
+### Phase 6: Finalization
 
-**Main flow finalizes**:
+#### Step 1: Update Context Package
+
+```javascript
+// Sync updated analyses to context-package.json
+const context_pkg = Read(".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/context-package.json")
+
+// Update guidance-specification if exists
+// Update synthesis-specification if exists
+// Re-read all role analysis files
+// Update metadata timestamps
+
+Write(context_pkg_path, JSON.stringify(context_pkg))
+```
+
+#### Step 2: Update Session Metadata
 
-1. Wait for all parallel agents to complete
-2. Update workflow-session.json:
 ```json
 {
   "phases": {
@@ -330,15 +323,13 @@ Updated {role2}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
       "completed_at": "timestamp",
       "participating_roles": [...],
       "clarification_results": {
-        "enhancements_applied": ["EP-001", "EP-002", ...],
+        "enhancements_applied": ["EP-001", "EP-002"],
         "questions_asked": 3,
-        "categories_clarified": ["Architecture", "UX", ...],
-        "roles_updated": ["role1", "role2", ...],
-        "outstanding_items": []
+        "categories_clarified": ["Architecture", "UX"],
+        "roles_updated": ["role1", "role2"]
       },
       "quality_metrics": {
         "user_intent_alignment": "validated",
-        "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
         "ambiguity_resolution": "complete",
         "terminology_consistency": "enforced"
       }
@@ -347,7 +338,8 @@ Updated {role2}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
 }
 ```
 
-3. Generate completion report (show to user):
+#### Step 3: Completion Report
+
 ```markdown
 ## ✅ Clarification Complete
 
@@ -359,9 +351,11 @@ Updated {role2}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
 ✅ PROCEED: `/workflow:plan --session WFS-{session-id}`
 ```
 
+---
+
 ## Output
 
-**Location**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis*.md` (in-place updates)
+**Location**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis*.md`
 
 **Updated Structure**:
 ```markdown
@@ -381,116 +375,24 @@ Updated {role2}/analysis.md with Clarifications section + enhanced content
 - Ambiguities resolved, placeholders removed
 - Consistent terminology
 
-### Phase 6: Update Context Package
-
-**Purpose**: Sync updated role analyses to context-package.json to avoid stale cache
-
-**Operations**:
-```bash
-context_pkg_path = ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.process/context-package.json"
-
-# 1. Read existing package
-context_pkg = Read(context_pkg_path)
-
-# 2. Re-read brainstorm artifacts (now with synthesis enhancements)
-brainstorm_dir = ".workflow/active/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming"
-
-# 2.1 Update guidance-specification if exists
-IF exists({brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md):
-    context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.guidance_specification.content = Read({brainstorm_dir}/guidance-specification.md)
-    context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.guidance_specification.updated_at = NOW()
-
-# 2.2 Update synthesis-specification if exists
-IF exists({brainstorm_dir}/synthesis-specification.md):
-    IF context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output:
-        context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output.content = Read({brainstorm_dir}/synthesis-specification.md)
-        context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output.updated_at = NOW()
-
-# 2.3 Re-read all role analysis files
-role_analysis_files = Glob({brainstorm_dir}/*/analysis*.md)
-context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses = []
-
-FOR file IN role_analysis_files:
-    role_name = extract_role_from_path(file)  # e.g., "ui-designer"
-    relative_path = file.replace({brainstorm_dir}/, "")
-
-    context_pkg.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses.push({
-        "role": role_name,
-        "files": [{
-            "path": relative_path,
-            "type": "primary",
-            "content": Read(file),
-            "updated_at": NOW()
-        }]
-    })
-
-# 3. Update metadata
-context_pkg.metadata.updated_at = NOW()
-context_pkg.metadata.synthesis_timestamp = NOW()
-
-# 4. Write back
-Write(context_pkg_path, JSON.stringify(context_pkg, indent=2))
-
-REPORT: "✅ Updated context-package.json with synthesis results"
-```
-
-**TodoWrite Update**:
-```json
-{"content": "Update context package with synthesis results", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Updating context package"}
-```
-
-## Session Metadata
-
-Update `workflow-session.json`:
-
-```json
-{
-  "phases": {
-    "BRAINSTORM": {
-      "status": "clarification_completed",
-      "clarification_completed": true,
-      "completed_at": "timestamp",
-      "participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", ...],
-      "clarification_results": {
-        "questions_asked": 3,
-        "categories_clarified": ["Architecture & Design", ...],
-        "roles_updated": ["system-architect", "ui-designer", ...],
-        "outstanding_items": []
-      },
-      "quality_metrics": {
-        "user_intent_alignment": "validated",
-        "requirement_coverage": "comprehensive",
-        "ambiguity_resolution": "complete",
-        "terminology_consistency": "enforced",
-        "decision_transparency": "documented"
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
+---
 
 ## Quality Checklist
 
 **Content**:
-- All role analyses loaded/analyzed
-- Cross-role analysis (consensus, conflicts, gaps)
-- 9-category ambiguity scan
-- Questions prioritized
-- Clarifications documented
+- ✅ All role analyses loaded/analyzed
+- ✅ Cross-role analysis (consensus, conflicts, gaps)
+- ✅ 9-category ambiguity scan
+- ✅ Questions prioritized
 
 **Analysis**:
-- User intent validated
-- Cross-role synthesis complete
-- Ambiguities resolved
-- Correct roles updated
-- Terminology consistent
-- Contradictions removed
+- ✅ User intent validated
+- ✅ Cross-role synthesis complete
+- ✅ Ambiguities resolved
+- ✅ Terminology consistent
 
 **Documents**:
-- Clarifications section formatted
-- Sections reflect answers
-- No placeholders (TODO/TBD)
-- Valid Markdown
-- Cross-references maintained
-
-
+- ✅ Clarifications section formatted
+- ✅ Sections reflect answers
+- ✅ No placeholders (TODO/TBD)
+- ✅ Valid Markdown

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/system-architect.md

@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ ELSE:
 **Framework-Based Analysis** (when guidance-specification.md exists):
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
      prompt="Generate system architect analysis addressing topic framework
 
      ## Framework Integration Required
@@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
 # For existing analysis updates
 IF update_mode = "incremental":
     Task(subagent_type="conceptual-planning-agent",
+         run_in_background=false,
          prompt="Update existing system architect analysis
 
          ## Current Analysis Context

.claude/commands/workflow/clean.md

@@ -0,0 +1,516 @@
+---
+name: clean
+description: Intelligent code cleanup with mainline detection, stale artifact discovery, and safe execution
+argument-hint: "[--dry-run] [\"focus area\"]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Clean Command (/workflow:clean)
+
+## Overview
+
+Intelligent cleanup command that explores the codebase to identify the development mainline, discovers artifacts that have drifted from it, and safely removes stale sessions, abandoned documents, and dead code.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Mainline detection: Identify active development branches and core modules
+- Drift analysis: Find sessions, documents, and code that deviate from mainline
+- Intelligent discovery: cli-explore-agent based artifact scanning
+- Safe execution: Confirmation-based cleanup with dry-run preview
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:clean                          # Full intelligent cleanup (explore → analyze → confirm → execute)
+/workflow:clean --dry-run                # Explore and analyze only, no execution
+/workflow:clean "auth module"            # Focus cleanup on specific area
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Mainline Detection
+   ├─ Analyze git history for development trends
+   ├─ Identify core modules (high commit frequency)
+   ├─ Map active vs stale branches
+   └─ Build mainline profile
+
+Phase 2: Drift Discovery (cli-explore-agent)
+   ├─ Scan workflow sessions for orphaned artifacts
+   ├─ Identify documents drifted from mainline
+   ├─ Detect dead code and unused exports
+   └─ Generate cleanup manifest
+
+Phase 3: Confirmation
+   ├─ Display cleanup summary by category
+   ├─ Show impact analysis (files, size, risk)
+   └─ AskUserQuestion: Select categories to clean
+
+Phase 4: Execution (unless --dry-run)
+   ├─ Execute cleanup by category
+   ├─ Update manifests and indexes
+   └─ Report results
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Mainline Detection
+
+**Session Setup**:
+```javascript
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
+const sessionId = `clean-${dateStr}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.clean/${sessionId}`
+
+Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}`)
+```
+
+**Step 1.1: Git History Analysis**
+```bash
+# Get commit frequency by directory (last 30 days)
+bash(git log --since="30 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | grep -v "^$" | cut -d/ -f1-2 | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20)
+
+# Get recent active branches
+bash(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/heads/ --format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:relative)' | head -10)
+
+# Get files with most recent changes
+bash(git log --since="7 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | grep -v "^$" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -30)
+```
+
+**Step 1.2: Build Mainline Profile**
+```javascript
+const mainlineProfile = {
+  coreModules: [],        // High-frequency directories
+  activeFiles: [],        // Recently modified files
+  activeBranches: [],     // Branches with recent commits
+  staleThreshold: {
+    sessions: 7,          // Days
+    branches: 30,
+    documents: 14
+  },
+  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString()
+}
+
+// Parse git log output to identify core modules
+// Modules with >5 commits in last 30 days = core
+// Modules with 0 commits in last 30 days = potentially stale
+
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/mainline-profile.json`, JSON.stringify(mainlineProfile, null, 2))
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Drift Discovery
+
+**Launch cli-explore-agent for intelligent artifact scanning**:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Discover stale artifacts",
+  prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Discover artifacts that have drifted from the development mainline. Identify stale sessions, abandoned documents, and dead code for cleanup.
+
+## Context
+- **Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
+- **Mainline Profile**: ${sessionFolder}/mainline-profile.json
+- **Focus Area**: ${focusArea || "全项目"}
+
+## Discovery Categories
+
+### Category 1: Stale Workflow Sessions
+Scan and analyze workflow session directories:
+
+**Locations to scan**:
+- .workflow/active/WFS-* (active sessions)
+- .workflow/archives/WFS-* (archived sessions)
+- .workflow/.lite-plan/* (lite-plan sessions)
+- .workflow/.debug/DBG-* (debug sessions)
+
+**Staleness criteria**:
+- Active sessions: No modification >7 days + no related git commits
+- Archives: >30 days old + no feature references in project.json
+- Lite-plan: >7 days old + plan.json not executed
+- Debug: >3 days old + issue not in recent commits
+
+**Analysis steps**:
+1. List all session directories with modification times
+2. Cross-reference with git log (are session topics in recent commits?)
+3. Check manifest.json for orphan entries
+4. Identify sessions with .archiving marker (interrupted)
+
+### Category 2: Drifted Documents
+Scan documentation that no longer aligns with code:
+
+**Locations to scan**:
+- .claude/rules/tech/* (generated tech rules)
+- .workflow/.scratchpad/* (temporary notes)
+- **/CLAUDE.md (module documentation)
+- **/README.md (outdated descriptions)
+
+**Drift criteria**:
+- Tech rules: Referenced files no longer exist
+- Scratchpad: Any file (always temporary)
+- Module docs: Describe functions/classes that were removed
+- READMEs: Reference deleted directories
+
+**Analysis steps**:
+1. Parse document content for file/function references
+2. Verify referenced entities still exist in codebase
+3. Flag documents with >30% broken references
+
+### Category 3: Dead Code
+Identify code that is no longer used:
+
+**Scan patterns**:
+- Unused exports (exported but never imported)
+- Orphan files (not imported anywhere)
+- Commented-out code blocks (>10 lines)
+- TODO/FIXME comments >90 days old
+
+**Analysis steps**:
+1. Build import graph using rg/grep
+2. Identify exports with no importers
+3. Find files not in import graph
+4. Scan for large comment blocks
+
+## Output Format
+
+Write to: ${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json
+
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "generated_at": "ISO timestamp",
+  "mainline_summary": {
+    "core_modules": ["src/core", "src/api"],
+    "active_branches": ["main", "feature/auth"],
+    "health_score": 0.85
+  },
+  "discoveries": {
+    "stale_sessions": [
+      {
+        "path": ".workflow/active/WFS-old-feature",
+        "type": "active",
+        "age_days": 15,
+        "reason": "No related commits in 15 days",
+        "size_kb": 1024,
+        "risk": "low"
+      }
+    ],
+    "drifted_documents": [
+      {
+        "path": ".claude/rules/tech/deprecated-lib",
+        "type": "tech_rules",
+        "broken_references": 5,
+        "total_references": 6,
+        "drift_percentage": 83,
+        "reason": "Referenced library removed",
+        "risk": "low"
+      }
+    ],
+    "dead_code": [
+      {
+        "path": "src/utils/legacy.ts",
+        "type": "orphan_file",
+        "reason": "Not imported by any file",
+        "last_modified": "2025-10-01",
+        "risk": "medium"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "summary": {
+    "total_items": 12,
+    "total_size_mb": 45.2,
+    "by_category": {
+      "stale_sessions": 5,
+      "drifted_documents": 4,
+      "dead_code": 3
+    },
+    "by_risk": {
+      "low": 8,
+      "medium": 3,
+      "high": 1
+    }
+  }
+}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Execution Commands
+
+\`\`\`bash
+# Session directories
+find .workflow -type d -name "WFS-*" -o -name "DBG-*" 2>/dev/null
+
+# Check modification times (Linux/Mac)
+stat -c "%Y %n" .workflow/active/WFS-* 2>/dev/null
+
+# Check modification times (Windows PowerShell via bash)
+powershell -Command "Get-ChildItem '.workflow/active/WFS-*' | ForEach-Object { Write-Output \"$($_.LastWriteTime) $($_.FullName)\" }"
+
+# Find orphan exports (TypeScript)
+rg "export (const|function|class|interface|type)" --type ts -l
+
+# Find imports
+rg "import.*from" --type ts
+
+# Find large comment blocks
+rg "^\\s*/\\*" -A 10 --type ts
+
+# Find old TODOs
+rg "TODO|FIXME" --type ts -n
+\`\`\`
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] All session directories scanned with age calculation
+- [ ] Documents cross-referenced with existing code
+- [ ] Dead code detection via import graph analysis
+- [ ] cleanup-manifest.json written with complete data
+- [ ] Each item has risk level and cleanup reason
+`
+)
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Confirmation
+
+**Step 3.1: Display Summary**
+```javascript
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json`))
+
+console.log(`
+## Cleanup Discovery Report
+
+**Mainline Health**: ${Math.round(manifest.mainline_summary.health_score * 100)}%
+**Core Modules**: ${manifest.mainline_summary.core_modules.join(', ')}
+
+### Summary
+| Category | Count | Size | Risk |
+|----------|-------|------|------|
+| Stale Sessions | ${manifest.summary.by_category.stale_sessions} | - | ${getRiskSummary('sessions')} |
+| Drifted Documents | ${manifest.summary.by_category.drifted_documents} | - | ${getRiskSummary('documents')} |
+| Dead Code | ${manifest.summary.by_category.dead_code} | - | ${getRiskSummary('code')} |
+
+**Total**: ${manifest.summary.total_items} items, ~${manifest.summary.total_size_mb} MB
+
+### Stale Sessions
+${manifest.discoveries.stale_sessions.map(s =>
+  `- ${s.path} (${s.age_days}d, ${s.risk}): ${s.reason}`
+).join('\n')}
+
+### Drifted Documents
+${manifest.discoveries.drifted_documents.map(d =>
+  `- ${d.path} (${d.drift_percentage}% broken, ${d.risk}): ${d.reason}`
+).join('\n')}
+
+### Dead Code
+${manifest.discoveries.dead_code.map(c =>
+  `- ${c.path} (${c.type}, ${c.risk}): ${c.reason}`
+).join('\n')}
+`)
+```
+
+**Step 3.2: Dry-Run Exit**
+```javascript
+if (flags.includes('--dry-run')) {
+  console.log(`
+---
+**Dry-run mode**: No changes made.
+Manifest saved to: ${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json
+
+To execute cleanup: /workflow:clean
+`)
+  return
+}
+```
+
+**Step 3.3: User Confirmation**
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "Which categories to clean?",
+      header: "Categories",
+      multiSelect: true,
+      options: [
+        {
+          label: "Sessions",
+          description: `${manifest.summary.by_category.stale_sessions} stale workflow sessions`
+        },
+        {
+          label: "Documents",
+          description: `${manifest.summary.by_category.drifted_documents} drifted documents`
+        },
+        {
+          label: "Dead Code",
+          description: `${manifest.summary.by_category.dead_code} unused code files`
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Risk level to include?",
+      header: "Risk",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Low only", description: "Safest - only obviously stale items" },
+        { label: "Low + Medium", description: "Recommended - includes likely unused items" },
+        { label: "All", description: "Aggressive - includes high-risk items" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Execution
+
+**Step 4.1: Filter Items by Selection**
+```javascript
+const selectedCategories = userSelection.categories  // ['Sessions', 'Documents', ...]
+const riskLevel = userSelection.risk                 // 'Low only', 'Low + Medium', 'All'
+
+const riskFilter = {
+  'Low only': ['low'],
+  'Low + Medium': ['low', 'medium'],
+  'All': ['low', 'medium', 'high']
+}[riskLevel]
+
+const itemsToClean = []
+
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Sessions')) {
+  itemsToClean.push(...manifest.discoveries.stale_sessions.filter(s => riskFilter.includes(s.risk)))
+}
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Documents')) {
+  itemsToClean.push(...manifest.discoveries.drifted_documents.filter(d => riskFilter.includes(d.risk)))
+}
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Dead Code')) {
+  itemsToClean.push(...manifest.discoveries.dead_code.filter(c => riskFilter.includes(c.risk)))
+}
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: itemsToClean.map(item => ({
+    content: `Clean: ${item.path}`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Cleaning ${item.path}`
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+**Step 4.2: Execute Cleanup**
+```javascript
+const results = { deleted: [], failed: [], skipped: [] }
+
+for (const item of itemsToClean) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: [...] })  // Mark current as in_progress
+
+  try {
+    if (item.type === 'orphan_file' || item.type === 'dead_export') {
+      // Dead code: Delete file or remove export
+      Bash({ command: `rm -rf "${item.path}"` })
+    } else {
+      // Sessions and documents: Delete directory/file
+      Bash({ command: `rm -rf "${item.path}"` })
+    }
+
+    results.deleted.push(item.path)
+    TodoWrite({ todos: [...] })  // Mark as completed
+  } catch (error) {
+    results.failed.push({ path: item.path, error: error.message })
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Step 4.3: Update Manifests**
+```javascript
+// Update archives manifest if sessions were deleted
+if (selectedCategories.includes('Sessions')) {
+  const archiveManifestPath = '.workflow/archives/manifest.json'
+  if (fileExists(archiveManifestPath)) {
+    const archiveManifest = JSON.parse(Read(archiveManifestPath))
+    const deletedSessionIds = results.deleted
+      .filter(p => p.includes('WFS-'))
+      .map(p => p.split('/').pop())
+
+    const updatedManifest = archiveManifest.filter(entry =>
+      !deletedSessionIds.includes(entry.session_id)
+    )
+
+    Write(archiveManifestPath, JSON.stringify(updatedManifest, null, 2))
+  }
+}
+
+// Update project.json if features referenced deleted sessions
+const projectPath = '.workflow/project.json'
+if (fileExists(projectPath)) {
+  const project = JSON.parse(Read(projectPath))
+  const deletedPaths = new Set(results.deleted)
+
+  project.features = project.features.filter(f =>
+    !deletedPaths.has(f.traceability?.archive_path)
+  )
+
+  project.statistics.total_features = project.features.length
+  project.statistics.last_updated = getUtc8ISOString()
+
+  Write(projectPath, JSON.stringify(project, null, 2))
+}
+```
+
+**Step 4.4: Report Results**
+```javascript
+console.log(`
+## Cleanup Complete
+
+**Deleted**: ${results.deleted.length} items
+**Failed**: ${results.failed.length} items
+**Skipped**: ${results.skipped.length} items
+
+### Deleted Items
+${results.deleted.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n')}
+
+${results.failed.length > 0 ? `
+### Failed Items
+${results.failed.map(f => `- ${f.path}: ${f.error}`).join('\n')}
+` : ''}
+
+Cleanup manifest archived to: ${sessionFolder}/cleanup-manifest.json
+`)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Session Folder Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.clean/{YYYY-MM-DD}/
+├── mainline-profile.json     # Git history analysis
+└── cleanup-manifest.json     # Discovery results
+```
+
+## Risk Level Definitions
+
+| Risk | Description | Examples |
+|------|-------------|----------|
+| **Low** | Safe to delete, no dependencies | Empty sessions, scratchpad files, 100% broken docs |
+| **Medium** | Likely unused, verify before delete | Orphan files, old archives, partially broken docs |
+| **High** | May have hidden dependencies | Files with some imports, recent modifications |
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| No git repository | Skip mainline detection, use file timestamps only |
+| Session in use (.archiving) | Skip with warning |
+| Permission denied | Report error, continue with others |
+| Manifest parse error | Regenerate from filesystem scan |
+| Empty discovery | Report "codebase is clean" |
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Properly archive active sessions
+- `/memory:compact` - Save session memory before cleanup
+- `/workflow:status` - View current workflow state

.claude/commands/workflow/debug.md

@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
+---
+name: debug
+description: Interactive hypothesis-driven debugging with NDJSON logging, iterative until resolved
+argument-hint: "\"bug description or error message\""
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(*), Glob(*), Bash(*), Edit(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Debug Command (/workflow:debug)
+
+## Overview
+
+Evidence-based interactive debugging command. Systematically identifies root causes through hypothesis-driven logging and iterative verification.
+
+**Core workflow**: Explore → Add Logging → Reproduce → Analyze Log → Fix → Verify
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:debug <BUG_DESCRIPTION>
+
+# Arguments
+<bug-description>          Bug description, error message, or stack trace (required)
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Session Detection:
+   ├─ Check if debug session exists for this bug
+   ├─ EXISTS + debug.log has content → Analyze mode
+   └─ NOT_FOUND or empty log → Explore mode
+
+Explore Mode:
+   ├─ Locate error source in codebase
+   ├─ Generate testable hypotheses (dynamic count)
+   ├─ Add NDJSON logging instrumentation
+   └─ Output: Hypothesis list + await user reproduction
+
+Analyze Mode:
+   ├─ Parse debug.log, validate each hypothesis
+   └─ Decision:
+       ├─ Confirmed → Fix root cause
+       ├─ Inconclusive → Add more logging, iterate
+       └─ All rejected → Generate new hypotheses
+
+Fix & Cleanup:
+   ├─ Apply fix based on confirmed hypothesis
+   ├─ User verifies
+   ├─ Remove debug instrumentation
+   └─ If not fixed → Return to Analyze mode
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Session Setup & Mode Detection
+
+```javascript
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const bugSlug = bug_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 30)
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
+
+const sessionId = `DBG-${bugSlug}-${dateStr}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.debug/${sessionId}`
+const debugLogPath = `${sessionFolder}/debug.log`
+
+// Auto-detect mode
+const sessionExists = fs.existsSync(sessionFolder)
+const logHasContent = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(debugLogPath) && fs.statSync(debugLogPath).size > 0
+
+const mode = logHasContent ? 'analyze' : 'explore'
+
+if (!sessionExists) {
+  bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}`)
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Explore Mode
+
+**Step 1.1: Locate Error Source**
+
+```javascript
+// Extract keywords from bug description
+const keywords = extractErrorKeywords(bug_description)
+// e.g., ['Stack Length', '未找到', 'registered 0']
+
+// Search codebase for error locations
+for (const keyword of keywords) {
+  Grep({ pattern: keyword, path: ".", output_mode: "content", "-C": 3 })
+}
+
+// Identify affected files and functions
+const affectedLocations = [...]  // from search results
+```
+
+**Step 1.2: Generate Hypotheses (Dynamic)**
+
+```javascript
+// Hypothesis categories based on error pattern
+const HYPOTHESIS_PATTERNS = {
+  "not found|missing|undefined|未找到": "data_mismatch",
+  "0|empty|zero|registered 0": "logic_error",
+  "timeout|connection|sync": "integration_issue",
+  "type|format|parse": "type_mismatch"
+}
+
+// Generate hypotheses based on actual issue (NOT fixed count)
+function generateHypotheses(bugDescription, affectedLocations) {
+  const hypotheses = []
+
+  // Analyze bug and create targeted hypotheses
+  // Each hypothesis has:
+  // - id: H1, H2, ... (dynamic count)
+  // - description: What might be wrong
+  // - testable_condition: What to log
+  // - logging_point: Where to add instrumentation
+
+  return hypotheses  // Could be 1, 3, 5, or more
+}
+
+const hypotheses = generateHypotheses(bug_description, affectedLocations)
+```
+
+**Step 1.3: Add NDJSON Instrumentation**
+
+For each hypothesis, add logging at the relevant location:
+
+**Python template**:
+```python
+# region debug [H{n}]
+try:
+    import json, time
+    _dbg = {
+        "sid": "{sessionId}",
+        "hid": "H{n}",
+        "loc": "{file}:{line}",
+        "msg": "{testable_condition}",
+        "data": {
+            # Capture relevant values here
+        },
+        "ts": int(time.time() * 1000)
+    }
+    with open(r"{debugLogPath}", "a", encoding="utf-8") as _f:
+        _f.write(json.dumps(_dbg, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
+except: pass
+# endregion
+```
+
+**JavaScript/TypeScript template**:
+```javascript
+// region debug [H{n}]
+try {
+  require('fs').appendFileSync("{debugLogPath}", JSON.stringify({
+    sid: "{sessionId}",
+    hid: "H{n}",
+    loc: "{file}:{line}",
+    msg: "{testable_condition}",
+    data: { /* Capture relevant values */ },
+    ts: Date.now()
+  }) + "\n");
+} catch(_) {}
+// endregion
+```
+
+**Output to user**:
+```
+## Hypotheses Generated
+
+Based on error "{bug_description}", generated {n} hypotheses:
+
+{hypotheses.map(h => `
+### ${h.id}: ${h.description}
+- Logging at: ${h.logging_point}
+- Testing: ${h.testable_condition}
+`).join('')}
+
+**Debug log**: ${debugLogPath}
+
+**Next**: Run reproduction steps, then come back for analysis.
+```
+
+---
+
+### Analyze Mode
+
+```javascript
+// Parse NDJSON log
+const entries = Read(debugLogPath).split('\n')
+  .filter(l => l.trim())
+  .map(l => JSON.parse(l))
+
+// Group by hypothesis
+const byHypothesis = groupBy(entries, 'hid')
+
+// Validate each hypothesis
+for (const [hid, logs] of Object.entries(byHypothesis)) {
+  const hypothesis = hypotheses.find(h => h.id === hid)
+  const latestLog = logs[logs.length - 1]
+
+  // Check if evidence confirms or rejects hypothesis
+  const verdict = evaluateEvidence(hypothesis, latestLog.data)
+  // Returns: 'confirmed' | 'rejected' | 'inconclusive'
+}
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```
+## Evidence Analysis
+
+Analyzed ${entries.length} log entries.
+
+${results.map(r => `
+### ${r.id}: ${r.description}
+- **Status**: ${r.verdict}
+- **Evidence**: ${JSON.stringify(r.evidence)}
+- **Reason**: ${r.reason}
+`).join('')}
+
+${confirmedHypothesis ? `
+## Root Cause Identified
+
+**${confirmedHypothesis.id}**: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}
+
+Ready to fix.
+` : `
+## Need More Evidence
+
+Add more logging or refine hypotheses.
+`}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Fix & Cleanup
+
+```javascript
+// Apply fix based on confirmed hypothesis
+// ... Edit affected files
+
+// After user verifies fix works:
+
+// Remove debug instrumentation (search for region markers)
+const instrumentedFiles = Grep({
+  pattern: "# region debug|// region debug",
+  output_mode: "files_with_matches"
+})
+
+for (const file of instrumentedFiles) {
+  // Remove content between region markers
+  removeDebugRegions(file)
+}
+
+console.log(`
+## Debug Complete
+
+- Root cause: ${confirmedHypothesis.description}
+- Fix applied to: ${modifiedFiles.join(', ')}
+- Debug instrumentation removed
+`)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Debug Log Format (NDJSON)
+
+Each line is a JSON object:
+
+```json
+{"sid":"DBG-xxx-2025-12-18","hid":"H1","loc":"file.py:func:42","msg":"Check dict keys","data":{"keys":["a","b"],"target":"c","found":false},"ts":1734567890123}
+```
+
+| Field | Description |
+|-------|-------------|
+| `sid` | Session ID |
+| `hid` | Hypothesis ID (H1, H2, ...) |
+| `loc` | Code location |
+| `msg` | What's being tested |
+| `data` | Captured values |
+| `ts` | Timestamp (ms) |
+
+## Session Folder
+
+```
+.workflow/.debug/DBG-{slug}-{date}/
+├── debug.log          # NDJSON log (main artifact)
+└── resolution.md      # Summary after fix (optional)
+```
+
+## Iteration Flow
+
+```
+First Call (/workflow:debug "error"):
+   ├─ No session exists → Explore mode
+   ├─ Extract error keywords, search codebase
+   ├─ Generate hypotheses, add logging
+   └─ Await user reproduction
+
+After Reproduction (/workflow:debug "error"):
+   ├─ Session exists + debug.log has content → Analyze mode
+   ├─ Parse log, evaluate hypotheses
+   └─ Decision:
+       ├─ Confirmed → Fix → User verify
+       │   ├─ Fixed → Cleanup → Done
+       │   └─ Not fixed → Add logging → Iterate
+       ├─ Inconclusive → Add logging → Iterate
+       └─ All rejected → New hypotheses → Iterate
+
+Output:
+   └─ .workflow/.debug/DBG-{slug}-{date}/debug.log
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Empty debug.log | Verify reproduction triggered the code path |
+| All hypotheses rejected | Generate new hypotheses with broader scope |
+| Fix doesn't work | Iterate with more granular logging |
+| >5 iterations | Escalate to `/workflow:lite-fix` with evidence |

.claude/commands/workflow/execute.md

@@ -15,22 +15,16 @@ Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, ag
 
 **Lazy Loading**: Task JSONs read **on-demand** during execution, not upfront. TODO_LIST.md + IMPL_PLAN.md provide metadata for planning.
 
-| Metric | Before | After | Improvement |
-|--------|--------|-------|-------------|
-| **Initial Load** | All task JSONs (~2,300 lines) | TODO_LIST.md only (~650 lines) | **72% reduction** |
-| **Startup Time** | Seconds | Milliseconds | **~90% faster** |
-| **Memory** | All tasks | 1-2 tasks | **90% less** |
-| **Scalability** | 10-20 tasks | 100+ tasks | **5-10x** |
-
 **Loading Strategy**:
-- **TODO_LIST.md**: Read in Phase 2 (task metadata, status, dependencies)
-- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Read existence in Phase 2, parse execution strategy when needed
-- **Task JSONs**: Complete lazy loading (read only during execution)
+- **TODO_LIST.md**: Read in Phase 3 (task metadata, status, dependencies for TodoWrite generation)
+- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Check existence in Phase 2 (normal mode), parse execution strategy in Phase 4A
+- **Task JSONs**: Lazy loading - read only when task is about to execute (Phase 4B)
 
 ## Core Rules
 **Complete entire workflow autonomously without user interruption, using TodoWrite for comprehensive progress tracking.**
 **Execute all discovered pending tasks until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
-**Auto-complete session when all tasks finished: Call `/workflow:session:complete` upon workflow completion.**
+**User-choice completion: When all tasks finished, ask user to choose review or complete.**
+**ONE AGENT = ONE TASK JSON: Each agent instance executes exactly one task JSON file - never batch multiple tasks into single agent execution.**
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
 - **Session Discovery**: Identify and select active workflow sessions
@@ -39,16 +33,60 @@ Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, ag
 - **Agent Orchestration**: Coordinate specialized agents with complete context
 - **Status Synchronization**: Update task JSON files and workflow state
 - **Autonomous Completion**: Continue execution until all tasks complete or reach blocking state
-- **Session Auto-Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all workflow tasks finished
+- **Session User-Choice Completion**: Ask user to choose review or complete when all tasks finished
 
 ## Execution Philosophy
-- **IMPL_PLAN-driven**: Follow execution strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md Section 4
-- **Discovery-first**: Auto-discover existing plans and tasks
-- **Status-aware**: Execute only ready tasks with resolved dependencies
-- **Context-rich**: Provide complete task JSON and accumulated context to agents
 - **Progress tracking**: Continuous TodoWrite updates throughout entire workflow execution
 - **Autonomous completion**: Execute all tasks without user interruption until workflow complete
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Normal Mode:
+Phase 1: Discovery
+   ├─ Count active sessions
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ count=0 → ERROR: No active sessions
+      ├─ count=1 → Auto-select session → Phase 2
+      └─ count>1 → AskUserQuestion (max 4 options) → Phase 2
+
+Phase 2: Planning Document Validation
+   ├─ Check IMPL_PLAN.md exists
+   ├─ Check TODO_LIST.md exists
+   └─ Validate .task/ contains IMPL-*.json files
+
+Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
+   ├─ Update session status to "active" (Step 0)
+   ├─ Parse TODO_LIST.md for task statuses
+   ├─ Generate TodoWrite for entire workflow
+   └─ Prepare session context paths
+
+Phase 4: Execution Strategy & Task Execution
+   ├─ Step 4A: Parse execution strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md
+   └─ Step 4B: Execute tasks with lazy loading
+      └─ Loop:
+         ├─ Get next in_progress task from TodoWrite
+         ├─ Lazy load task JSON
+         ├─ Launch agent with task context
+         ├─ Mark task completed (update IMPL-*.json status)
+         │  # Quick fix: Update task status for ccw dashboard
+         │  # TS=$(date -Iseconds) && jq --arg ts "$TS" '.status="completed" | .status_history=(.status_history // [])+[{"from":"in_progress","to":"completed","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
+         └─ Advance to next task
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   ├─ Update task statuses in JSON files
+   ├─ Generate summaries
+   └─ AskUserQuestion: Choose next step
+      ├─ "Enter Review" → /workflow:review
+      └─ "Complete Session" → /workflow:session:complete
+
+Resume Mode (--resume-session):
+   ├─ Skip Phase 1 & Phase 2
+   └─ Entry Point: Phase 3 (TodoWrite Generation)
+      ├─ Update session status to "active" (if not already)
+      └─ Continue: Phase 4 → Phase 5
+```
+
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
 ### Phase 1: Discovery
@@ -81,26 +119,34 @@ Auto-select and continue to Phase 2.
 
 List sessions with metadata and prompt user selection:
 ```bash
-bash(for dir in .workflow/active/WFS-*/; do
-  session=$(basename "$dir")
-  project=$(jq -r '.project // "Unknown"' "$dir/workflow-session.json" 2>/dev/null)
-  total=$(grep -c "^- \[" "$dir/TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "0")
-  completed=$(grep -c "^- \[x\]" "$dir/TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "0")
-  [ "$total" -gt 0 ] && progress=$((completed * 100 / total)) || progress=0
-  echo "${session} | ${project} | ${completed}/${total} tasks (${progress}%)"
-done)
+bash(for dir in .workflow/active/WFS-*/; do [ -d "$dir" ] || continue; session=$(basename "$dir"); project=$(jq -r '.project // "Unknown"' "${dir}workflow-session.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "Unknown"); total=$(grep -c '^\- \[' "${dir}TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo 0); completed=$(grep -c '^\- \[x\]' "${dir}TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo 0); if [ "$total" -gt 0 ]; then progress=$((completed * 100 / total)); else progress=0; fi; echo "$session | $project | $completed/$total tasks ($progress%)"; done)
 ```
 
-Use AskUserQuestion to present formatted options:
-```
-Multiple active workflow sessions detected. Please select one:
+Use AskUserQuestion to present formatted options (max 4 options shown):
+```javascript
+// If more than 4 sessions, show most recent 4 with "Other" option for manual input
+const sessions = getActiveSessions()  // sorted by last modified
+const displaySessions = sessions.slice(0, 4)
 
-1. WFS-auth-system | Authentication System | 3/5 tasks (60%)
-2. WFS-payment-module | Payment Integration | 0/8 tasks (0%)
-
-Enter number, full session ID, or partial match:
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Multiple active sessions detected. Select one:",
+    header: "Session",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: displaySessions.map(s => ({
+      label: s.id,
+      description: `${s.project} | ${s.progress}`
+    }))
+    // Note: User can select "Other" to manually enter session ID
+  }]
+})
 ```
 
+**Input Validation**:
+- If user selects from options: Use selected session ID
+- If user selects "Other" and provides input: Validate session exists
+- If validation fails: Show error and re-prompt or suggest available sessions
+
 Parse user input (supports: number "1", full ID "WFS-auth-system", or partial "auth"), validate selection, and continue to Phase 2.
 
 #### Step 1.3: Load Session Metadata
@@ -113,37 +159,43 @@ bash(cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json)
 
 **Resume Mode**: This entire phase is skipped when `--resume-session="session-id"` flag is provided.
 
-### Phase 2: Planning Document Analysis
+### Phase 2: Planning Document Validation
 **Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
 
-**Optimized to avoid reading all task JSONs upfront**
+**Purpose**: Validate planning artifacts exist before execution
 
 **Process**:
-1. **Read IMPL_PLAN.md**: Check existence, understand overall strategy
-2. **Read TODO_LIST.md**: Get current task statuses and execution progress
-3. **Extract Task Metadata**: Parse task IDs, titles, and dependency relationships from TODO_LIST.md
-4. **Build Execution Queue**: Determine ready tasks based on TODO_LIST.md status and dependencies
+1. **Check IMPL_PLAN.md**: Verify file exists (defer detailed parsing to Phase 4A)
+2. **Check TODO_LIST.md**: Verify file exists (defer reading to Phase 3)
+3. **Validate Task Directory**: Ensure `.task/` contains at least one IMPL-*.json file
 
-**Key Optimization**: Use IMPL_PLAN.md (existence check only) and TODO_LIST.md as primary sources instead of reading all task JSONs
+**Key Optimization**: Only existence checks here. Actual file reading happens in later phases.
 
-**Resume Mode**: This phase is skipped when `--resume-session` flag is provided (session already known).
+**Resume Mode**: This phase is skipped when `--resume-session` flag is provided. Resume mode entry point is Phase 3.
 
 ### Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
 **Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes (resume mode entry point)
 
+**Step 0: Update Session Status to Active**
+Before generating TodoWrite, update session status from "planning" to "active":
+```bash
+# Update session status (idempotent - safe to run if already active)
+jq '.status = "active" | .execution_started_at = (.execution_started_at // now | todate)' \
+  .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json > tmp.json && \
+  mv tmp.json .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json
+```
+This ensures the dashboard shows the session as "ACTIVE" during execution.
+
 **Process**:
 1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list from TODO_LIST.md (not from task JSONs)
    - Parse TODO_LIST.md to extract all tasks with current statuses
    - Identify first pending task with met dependencies
    - Generate comprehensive TodoWrite covering entire workflow
-2. **Mark Initial Status**: Set first ready task(s) as `in_progress` in TodoWrite
-   - **Sequential execution**: Mark ONE task as `in_progress`
-   - **Parallel batch**: Mark ALL tasks in current batch as `in_progress`
-3. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
-4. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md exist and are valid
+2. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
+3. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md exist and are valid
 
 **Resume Mode Behavior**:
-- Load existing TODO_LIST.md directly from `.workflow/active//{session-id}/`
+- Load existing TODO_LIST.md directly from `.workflow/active/{session-id}/`
 - Extract current progress from TODO_LIST.md
 - Generate TodoWrite from TODO_LIST.md state
 - Proceed immediately to agent execution (Phase 4)
@@ -169,7 +221,7 @@ If IMPL_PLAN.md lacks execution strategy, use intelligent fallback (analyze task
 ```
 while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
   next_task_id = getTodoWriteInProgressTask()
-  task_json = Read(.workflow/session/{session}/.task/{next_task_id}.json)  // Lazy load
+  task_json = Read(.workflow/active/{session}/.task/{next_task_id}.json)  // Lazy load
   executeTaskWithAgent(task_json)
   updateTodoListMarkCompleted(next_task_id)
   advanceTodoWriteToNextTask()
@@ -183,14 +235,10 @@ while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
 4. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with complete context including flow control steps
 5. **Monitor Progress**: Track agent execution and handle errors without user interruption
 6. **Collect Results**: Gather implementation results and outputs
-7. **Update TODO_LIST.md**: Mark current task as completed in TODO_LIST.md
-8. **Continue Workflow**: Identify next pending task from TODO_LIST.md and repeat
+7. **Continue Workflow**: Identify next pending task from TODO_LIST.md and repeat
+
+**Note**: TODO_LIST.md updates are handled by agents (e.g., code-developer.md), not by the orchestrator.
 
-**Benefits**:
-- Reduces initial context loading by ~90%
-- Only reads task JSON when actually executing
-- Scales better for workflows with many tasks
-- Faster startup time for workflow execution
 
 ### Phase 5: Completion
 **Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
@@ -201,7 +249,31 @@ while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
 3. **Update TodoWrite**: Mark current task complete, advance to next
 4. **Synchronize State**: Update session state and workflow status
 5. **Check Workflow Complete**: Verify all tasks are completed
-6. **Auto-Complete Session**: Call `/workflow:session:complete` when all tasks finished
+6. **User Choice**: When all tasks finished, ask user to choose next step:
+
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "All tasks completed. What would you like to do next?",
+    header: "Next Step",
+    multiSelect: false,
+    options: [
+      {
+        label: "Enter Review",
+        description: "Run specialized review (security/architecture/quality/action-items)"
+      },
+      {
+        label: "Complete Session",
+        description: "Archive session and update manifest"
+      }
+    ]
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Based on user selection**:
+- **"Enter Review"**: Execute `/workflow:review`
+- **"Complete Session"**: Execute `/workflow:session:complete`
 
 ## Execution Strategy (IMPL_PLAN-Driven)
 
@@ -237,8 +309,9 @@ while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
 
 #### 2. Parallel Execution
 **When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Parallel" with clear parallelization opportunities
-**Pattern**: Execute independent task groups concurrently
+**Pattern**: Execute independent task groups concurrently by launching multiple agent instances
 **TodoWrite**: MULTIPLE tasks (in same batch) marked as `in_progress` simultaneously
+**Agent Instantiation**: Launch one agent instance per task (respects ONE AGENT = ONE TASK JSON rule)
 
 #### 3. Phased Execution
 **When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Phased" with phase breakdown
@@ -276,7 +349,7 @@ blocked → skip until dependencies clear
 - **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
 
 **Rule 4: Workflow Completion Check**
-- When all tasks marked `completed`, auto-call `/workflow:session:complete`
+- When all tasks marked `completed`, prompt user to choose review or complete session
 
 ### TodoWrite Tool Usage
 
@@ -326,231 +399,47 @@ TodoWrite({
 });
 ```
 
-### TODO_LIST.md Update Timing
-**Single source of truth for task status** - enables lazy loading by providing task metadata without reading JSONs
-
-- **Before Agent Launch**: Mark task as `in_progress`
-- **After Task Complete**: Mark as `completed`, advance to next
-- **On Error**: Keep as `in_progress`, add error note
-- **Workflow Complete**: Call `/workflow:session:complete`
-
-## Agent Context Management
-
-### Context Sources (Priority Order)
-1. **Complete Task JSON**: Full task definition including all fields and artifacts
-2. **Artifacts Context**: Brainstorming outputs and role analyses from task.context.artifacts
-3. **Flow Control Context**: Accumulated outputs from pre_analysis steps (including artifact loading)
-4. **Dependency Summaries**: Previous task completion summaries
-5. **Session Context**: Workflow paths and session metadata
-6. **Inherited Context**: Parent task context and shared variables
-
-### Context Assembly Process
-```
-1. Load Task JSON → Base context (including artifacts array)
-2. Load Artifacts → Synthesis specifications and brainstorming outputs
-3. Execute Flow Control → Accumulated context (with artifact loading steps)
-4. Load Dependencies → Dependency context
-5. Prepare Session Paths → Session context
-6. Combine All → Complete agent context with artifact integration
-```
-
-### Agent Context Package Structure
-```json
-{
-  "task": { /* Complete task JSON with artifacts array */ },
-  "artifacts": {
-    "synthesis_specification": { "path": "{{from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output.path}}", "priority": "highest" },
-    "guidance_specification": { "path": "{{from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.guidance_specification.path}}", "priority": "medium" },
-    "role_analyses": [ /* From context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[] */ ],
-    "conflict_resolution": { "path": "{{from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path}}", "conditional": true }
-  },
-  "flow_context": {
-    "step_outputs": {
-      "synthesis_specification": "...",
-      "individual_artifacts": "...",
-      "pattern_analysis": "...",
-      "dependency_context": "..."
-    }
-  },
-  "session": {
-    "workflow_dir": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/",
-    "context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/.process/context-package.json",
-    "todo_list_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/TODO_LIST.md",
-    "summaries_dir": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/.summaries/",
-    "task_json_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/.task/IMPL-1.1.json"
-  },
-  "dependencies": [ /* Task summaries from depends_on */ ],
-  "inherited": { /* Parent task context */ }
-}
-```
-
-### Context Validation Rules
-- **Task JSON Complete**: All 5 fields present and valid, including artifacts array in context
-- **Artifacts Available**: All artifacts loaded from context-package.json
-- **Flow Control Ready**: All pre_analysis steps completed including artifact loading steps
-- **Dependencies Loaded**: All depends_on summaries available
-- **Session Paths Valid**: All workflow paths exist and accessible (verified via context-package.json)
-- **Agent Assignment**: Valid agent type specified in meta.agent
-
 ## Agent Execution Pattern
 
 ### Flow Control Execution
 **[FLOW_CONTROL]** marker indicates task JSON contains `flow_control.pre_analysis` steps for context preparation.
 
-**Orchestrator Responsibility**:
-- Pass complete task JSON to agent (including `flow_control` block)
-- Provide session paths for artifact access
-- Monitor agent completion
-
-**Agent Responsibility**:
-- Parse `flow_control.pre_analysis` array from JSON
-- Execute steps sequentially with variable substitution
-- Accumulate context from artifacts and dependencies
-- Follow error handling per `step.on_error`
-- Complete implementation using accumulated context
-
-**Orchestrator does NOT execute flow control steps - Agent interprets and executes them from JSON.**
+**Note**: Orchestrator does NOT execute flow control steps - Agent interprets and executes them autonomously.
 
 ### Agent Prompt Template
+**Path-Based Invocation**: Pass paths and trigger markers, let agent parse task JSON autonomously.
+
 ```bash
 Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
-     prompt="**EXECUTE TASK FROM JSON**
+     run_in_background=false,
+     prompt="Implement task {task.id}: {task.title}
 
-     ## Task JSON Location
-     {session.task_json_path}
+     [FLOW_CONTROL]
 
-     ## Instructions
-     1. **Load Complete Task JSON**: Read and validate all fields (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control)
-     2. **Execute Flow Control**: If `flow_control.pre_analysis` exists, execute steps sequentially:
-        - Load artifacts (role analysis documents, role analyses) using commands in each step
-        - Accumulate context from step outputs using variable substitution [variable_name]
-        - Handle errors per step.on_error (skip_optional | fail | retry_once)
-     3. **Implement Solution**: Follow `flow_control.implementation_approach` using accumulated context
-     4. **Complete Task**:
-        - Update task status: `jq '.status = \"completed\"' {session.task_json_path} > temp.json && mv temp.json {session.task_json_path}`
-        - Update TODO_LIST.md: Mark task as [x] completed in {session.todo_list_path}
-        - Generate summary: {session.summaries_dir}/{task.id}-summary.md
-        - Check workflow completion and call `/workflow:session:complete` if all tasks done
+     **Input**:
+     - Task JSON: {session.task_json_path}
+     - Context Package: {session.context_package_path}
 
-     ## Context Sources (All from JSON)
-     - Requirements: `context.requirements`
-     - Focus Paths: `context.focus_paths`
-     - Acceptance: `context.acceptance`
-     - Artifacts: `context.artifacts` (synthesis specs, brainstorming outputs)
-     - Dependencies: `context.depends_on`
-     - Target Files: `flow_control.target_files`
-
-     ## Session Paths
-     - Workflow Dir: {session.workflow_dir}
+     **Output Location**:
+     - Workflow: {session.workflow_dir}
      - TODO List: {session.todo_list_path}
      - Summaries: {session.summaries_dir}
-     - Flow Context: {flow_context.step_outputs}
 
-     **Complete JSON structure is authoritative - load and follow it exactly.**"),
-     description="Execute task: {task.id}")
+     **Execution**: Read task JSON → Parse flow_control → Execute implementation_approach → Update TODO_LIST.md → Generate summary",
+     description="Implement: {task.id}")
 ```
 
-### Agent JSON Loading Specification
-**MANDATORY AGENT PROTOCOL**: All agents must follow this exact loading sequence:
+**Key Markers**:
+- `Implement` keyword: Triggers tech stack detection and guidelines loading
+- `[FLOW_CONTROL]`: Triggers flow_control.pre_analysis execution
 
-1. **JSON Loading**: First action must be `cat {session.task_json_path}`
-2. **Field Validation**: Verify all 5 required fields exist: `id`, `title`, `status`, `meta`, `context`, `flow_control`
-3. **Structure Parsing**: Parse nested fields correctly:
-   - `meta.type` and `meta.agent` (NOT flat `task_type`)
-   - `context.requirements`, `context.focus_paths`, `context.acceptance`
-   - `context.depends_on`, `context.inherited`
-   - `flow_control.pre_analysis` array, `flow_control.target_files`
-4. **Flow Control Execution**: If `flow_control.pre_analysis` exists, execute steps sequentially
-5. **Status Management**: Update JSON status upon completion
+**Why Path-Based**: Agent (code-developer.md) autonomously:
+- Reads and parses task JSON (requirements, acceptance, flow_control)
+- Loads tech stack guidelines based on detected language
+- Executes pre_analysis steps and implementation_approach
+- Generates structured summary with integration points
 
-**JSON Field Reference**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-1.2",
-  "title": "Task title",
-  "status": "pending|active|completed|blocked",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs",
-    "agent": "@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@universal-executor"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": ["req1", "req2"],
-    "focus_paths": ["src/path1", "src/path2"],
-    "acceptance": ["criteria1", "criteria2"],
-    "depends_on": ["IMPL-1.1"],
-    "inherited": { "from": "parent", "context": ["info"] },
-    "artifacts": [
-      {
-        "type": "synthesis_specification",
-        "source": "context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output",
-        "path": "{{loaded dynamically from context-package.json}}",
-        "priority": "highest",
-        "contains": "complete_integrated_specification"
-      },
-      {
-        "type": "individual_role_analysis",
-        "source": "context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[]",
-        "path": "{{loaded dynamically from context-package.json}}",
-        "note": "Supports analysis*.md pattern (analysis.md, analysis-01.md, analysis-api.md, etc.)",
-        "priority": "low",
-        "contains": "role_specific_analysis_fallback"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_synthesis_specification",
-        "action": "Load synthesis specification from context-package.json",
-        "commands": [
-          "Read(.workflow/active/WFS-[session]/.process/context-package.json)",
-          "Extract(brainstorm_artifacts.synthesis_output.path)",
-          "Read(extracted path)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "synthesis_specification",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "step_name",
-        "command": "bash_command",
-        "output_to": "variable",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional|fail|retry_once"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Implement task following role analyses",
-        "description": "Implement '[title]' following role analyses. PRIORITY: Use role analysis documents as primary requirement source. When implementation needs technical details (e.g., API schemas, caching configs, design tokens), refer to artifacts[] for detailed specifications from original role analyses.",
-        "modification_points": [
-          "Apply consolidated requirements from role analysis documents",
-          "Follow technical guidelines from synthesis",
-          "Consult artifacts for implementation details when needed",
-          "Integrate with existing patterns"
-        ],
-        "logic_flow": [
-          "Load role analyses",
-          "Parse architecture and requirements",
-          "Implement following specification",
-          "Consult artifacts for technical details when needed",
-          "Validate against acceptance criteria"
-        ],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "implementation"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": ["file:function:lines", "path/to/NewFile.ts"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Execution Flow
-1. **Load Task JSON**: Agent reads and validates complete JSON structure
-2. **Execute Flow Control**: Agent runs pre_analysis steps if present
-3. **Prepare Implementation**: Agent uses implementation_approach from JSON
-4. **Launch Implementation**: Agent follows focus_paths and target_files
-5. **Update Status**: Agent marks JSON status as completed
-6. **Generate Summary**: Agent creates completion summary
+Embedding task content in prompt creates duplication and conflicts with agent's parsing logic.
 
 ### Agent Assignment Rules
 ```
@@ -568,7 +457,7 @@ meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
 .workflow/active/WFS-[topic-slug]/
 ├── workflow-session.json     # Session state and metadata
 ├── IMPL_PLAN.md             # Planning document and requirements
-├── TODO_LIST.md             # Progress tracking (auto-updated)
+├── TODO_LIST.md             # Progress tracking (updated by agents)
 ├── .task/                   # Task definitions (JSON only)
 │   ├── IMPL-1.json          # Main task definitions
 │   └── IMPL-1.1.json        # Subtask definitions
@@ -603,28 +492,3 @@ meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
 - **Dependency Validation**: Check all depends_on references exist
 - **Context Verification**: Ensure all required context is available
 
-### Recovery Procedures
-
-**Session Recovery**:
-```bash
-# Check session integrity
-find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d | while read session_dir; do
-  session=$(basename "$session_dir")
-  [ ! -f "$session_dir/workflow-session.json" ] && \
-    echo '{"session_id":"'$session'","status":"active"}' > "$session_dir/workflow-session.json"
-done
-```
-
-**Task Recovery**:
-```bash
-# Validate task JSON integrity
-for task_file in .workflow/active/$session/.task/*.json; do
-  jq empty "$task_file" 2>/dev/null || echo "Corrupted: $task_file"
-done
-
-# Fix missing dependencies
-missing_deps=$(jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' .workflow/active/$session/.task/*.json | sort -u)
-for dep in $missing_deps; do
-  [ ! -f ".workflow/active/$session/.task/$dep.json" ] && echo "Missing dependency: $dep"
-done
-```

.claude/commands/workflow/init.md

@@ -10,555 +10,202 @@ examples:
 # Workflow Init Command (/workflow:init)
 
 ## Overview
-Initializes `.workflow/project.json` with comprehensive project understanding by leveraging **cli-explore-agent** for intelligent analysis and **memory discovery** for SKILL package indexing.
+Initialize `.workflow/project-tech.json` and `.workflow/project-guidelines.json` with comprehensive project understanding by delegating analysis to **cli-explore-agent**.
 
-**Key Features**:
-- **Intelligent Project Analysis**: Uses cli-explore-agent's Deep Scan mode
-- **Technology Stack Detection**: Identifies languages, frameworks, build tools
-- **Architecture Overview**: Discovers patterns, layers, key components
-- **Memory Discovery**: Scans and indexes available SKILL packages
-- **Smart Recommendations**: Suggests memory commands based on project state
-- **One-time Initialization**: Skips if project.json exists (unless --regenerate)
+**Dual File System**:
+- `project-tech.json`: Auto-generated technical analysis (stack, architecture, components)
+- `project-guidelines.json`: User-maintained rules and constraints (created as scaffold)
+
+**Note**: This command may be called by other workflow commands. Upon completion, return immediately to continue the calling workflow without interrupting the task flow.
 
 ## Usage
 ```bash
-/workflow:init                 # Initialize project state (skip if exists)
-/workflow:init --regenerate    # Force regeneration of project.json
+/workflow:init                 # Initialize (skip if exists)
+/workflow:init --regenerate    # Force regeneration
 ```
 
-## Implementation Flow
+## Execution Process
 
-### Step 1: Check Existing State
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Parse --regenerate flag → regenerate = true | false
+
+Decision:
+   ├─ BOTH_EXIST + no --regenerate → Exit: "Already initialized"
+   ├─ EXISTS + --regenerate → Backup existing → Continue analysis
+   └─ NOT_FOUND → Continue analysis
+
+Analysis Flow:
+   ├─ Get project metadata (name, root)
+   ├─ Invoke cli-explore-agent
+   │   ├─ Structural scan (get_modules_by_depth.sh, find, wc)
+   │   ├─ Semantic analysis (Gemini CLI)
+   │   ├─ Synthesis and merge
+   │   └─ Write .workflow/project-tech.json
+   ├─ Create guidelines scaffold (if not exists)
+   │   └─ Write .workflow/project-guidelines.json (empty structure)
+   └─ Display summary
+
+Output:
+   ├─ .workflow/project-tech.json (+ .backup if regenerate)
+   └─ .workflow/project-guidelines.json (scaffold if new)
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Step 1: Parse Input and Check Existing State
+
+**Parse --regenerate flag**:
+```javascript
+const regenerate = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--regenerate')
+```
+
+**Check existing state**:
 
 ```bash
-# Check if project.json already exists
-bash(test -f .workflow/project.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND")
+bash(test -f .workflow/project-tech.json && echo "TECH_EXISTS" || echo "TECH_NOT_FOUND")
+bash(test -f .workflow/project-guidelines.json && echo "GUIDELINES_EXISTS" || echo "GUIDELINES_NOT_FOUND")
 ```
 
-**If EXISTS and no --regenerate flag**:
+**If BOTH_EXIST and no --regenerate**: Exit early
 ```
-Project already initialized at .workflow/project.json
-Use /workflow:init --regenerate to rebuild project analysis
-Use /workflow:status --project to view current state
+Project already initialized:
+- Tech analysis: .workflow/project-tech.json
+- Guidelines: .workflow/project-guidelines.json
+
+Use /workflow:init --regenerate to rebuild tech analysis
+Use /workflow:session:solidify to add guidelines
+Use /workflow:status --project to view state
 ```
 
-**If NOT_FOUND or --regenerate flag**: Proceed to initialization
-
-### Step 2: Project Discovery
+### Step 2: Get Project Metadata
 
 ```bash
-# Get project name and root
 bash(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)")
 bash(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
-
-# Create .workflow directory
 bash(mkdir -p .workflow)
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Intelligent Project Analysis
+### Step 3: Invoke cli-explore-agent
 
-**Invoke cli-explore-agent** with Deep Scan mode for comprehensive understanding:
+**For --regenerate**: Backup and preserve existing data
+```bash
+bash(cp .workflow/project-tech.json .workflow/project-tech.json.backup)
+```
+
+**Delegate analysis to agent**:
 
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
   description="Deep project analysis",
   prompt=`
-Analyze project structure and technology stack for workflow initialization.
+Analyze project for workflow initialization and generate .workflow/project-tech.json.
 
-## Analysis Objective
-Perform Deep Scan analysis to build comprehensive project understanding for .workflow/project.json initialization.
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
+1. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/project-tech-schema.json (get schema reference)
+2. Execute: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (get project structure)
 
-## Required Analysis
+## Task
+Generate complete project-tech.json with:
+- project_metadata: {name: ${projectName}, root_path: ${projectRoot}, initialized_at, updated_at}
+- technology_analysis: {description, languages, frameworks, build_tools, test_frameworks, architecture, key_components, dependencies}
+- development_status: ${regenerate ? 'preserve from backup' : '{completed_features: [], development_index: {feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: []}, statistics: {total_features: 0, total_sessions: 0, last_updated}}'}
+- _metadata: {initialized_by: "cli-explore-agent", analysis_timestamp, analysis_mode}
 
-### 1. Technology Stack Detection
-- **Primary Languages**: Identify all programming languages with file counts
-- **Frameworks**: Detect web frameworks (React, Vue, Express, Django, etc.)
-- **Build Tools**: Identify build systems (npm, cargo, maven, gradle, etc.)
-- **Test Frameworks**: Find testing tools (jest, pytest, go test, etc.)
+## Analysis Requirements
 
-### 2. Project Architecture
-- **Architecture Style**: Identify patterns (MVC, microservices, monorepo, etc.)
-- **Layer Structure**: Discover architectural layers (presentation, business, data)
-- **Design Patterns**: Find common patterns (singleton, factory, repository, etc.)
-- **Key Components**: List 5-10 core modules/components with brief descriptions
+**Technology Stack**:
+- Languages: File counts, mark primary
+- Frameworks: From package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, etc.
+- Build tools: npm, cargo, maven, webpack, vite
+- Test frameworks: jest, pytest, go test, junit
 
-### 3. Project Metrics
-- **Total Files**: Count source code files
-- **Lines of Code**: Estimate total LOC
-- **Module Count**: Number of top-level modules/packages
-- **Complexity**: Overall complexity rating (low/medium/high)
+**Architecture**:
+- Style: MVC, microservices, layered (from structure & imports)
+- Layers: presentation, business-logic, data-access
+- Patterns: singleton, factory, repository
+- Key components: 5-10 modules {name, path, description, importance}
 
-### 4. Entry Points
-- **Main Entry**: Identify primary application entry point(s)
-- **CLI Commands**: Discover available commands/scripts
-- **API Endpoints**: Find HTTP/REST/GraphQL endpoints (if applicable)
+## Execution
+1. Structural scan: get_modules_by_depth.sh, find, wc -l
+2. Semantic analysis: Gemini for patterns/architecture
+3. Synthesis: Merge findings
+4. ${regenerate ? 'Merge with preserved development_status from .workflow/project-tech.json.backup' : ''}
+5. Write JSON: Write('.workflow/project-tech.json', jsonContent)
+6. Report: Return brief completion summary
 
-## Execution Mode
-Use **Deep Scan** with Dual-Source Strategy:
-- Phase 1: Bash structural scan (fast pattern discovery)
-- Phase 2: Gemini semantic analysis (design intent, patterns)
-- Phase 3: Synthesis (merge findings with attribution)
-
-## Analysis Scope
-- Root directory: ${projectRoot}
-- Exclude: node_modules, dist, build, .git, vendor, __pycache__
-- Focus: Source code directories (src, lib, pkg, app, etc.)
-
-## Output Format
-Return JSON structure for programmatic processing:
-
-\`\`\`json
-{
-  "technology_stack": {
-    "languages": [
-      {"name": "TypeScript", "file_count": 150, "primary": true},
-      {"name": "Python", "file_count": 30, "primary": false}
-    ],
-    "frameworks": ["React", "Express", "TypeORM"],
-    "build_tools": ["npm", "webpack"],
-    "test_frameworks": ["Jest", "Supertest"]
-  },
-  "architecture": {
-    "style": "Layered MVC with Repository Pattern",
-    "layers": ["presentation", "business-logic", "data-access"],
-    "patterns": ["MVC", "Repository Pattern", "Dependency Injection"],
-    "key_components": [
-      {
-        "name": "Authentication Module",
-        "path": "src/auth",
-        "description": "JWT-based authentication with OAuth2 support",
-        "importance": "high"
-      },
-      {
-        "name": "User Management",
-        "path": "src/users",
-        "description": "User CRUD operations and profile management",
-        "importance": "high"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "metrics": {
-    "total_files": 180,
-    "lines_of_code": 15000,
-    "module_count": 12,
-    "complexity": "medium"
-  },
-  "entry_points": {
-    "main": "src/index.ts",
-    "cli_commands": ["npm start", "npm test", "npm run build"],
-    "api_endpoints": ["/api/auth", "/api/users", "/api/posts"]
-  },
-  "analysis_metadata": {
-    "timestamp": "2025-01-18T10:30:00Z",
-    "mode": "deep-scan",
-    "source": "cli-explore-agent"
-  }
-}
-\`\`\`
-
-## Quality Requirements
-- ✅ All technology stack items verified (no guessing)
-- ✅ Key components include file paths for navigation
-- ✅ Architecture style based on actual code patterns, not assumptions
-- ✅ Metrics calculated from actual file counts/lines
-- ✅ Entry points verified as executable
-  `
+Project root: ${projectRoot}
+`
 )
 ```
 
-**Agent Output**: JSON structure with comprehensive project analysis
+### Step 3.5: Create Guidelines Scaffold (if not exists)
 
-### Step 4: Build project.json from Analysis
-
-**Data Processing**:
 ```javascript
-// Parse agent analysis output
-const analysis = JSON.parse(agentOutput);
-
-// Build complete project.json structure
-const projectMeta = {
-  // Basic metadata
-  project_name: projectName,
-  initialized_at: new Date().toISOString(),
-
-  // Project overview (from cli-explore-agent)
-  overview: {
-    description: generateDescription(analysis), // e.g., "TypeScript web application with React frontend"
-    technology_stack: analysis.technology_stack,
-    architecture: {
-      style: analysis.architecture.style,
-      layers: analysis.architecture.layers,
-      patterns: analysis.architecture.patterns
+// Only create if not exists (never overwrite user guidelines)
+if (!file_exists('.workflow/project-guidelines.json')) {
+  const guidelinesScaffold = {
+    conventions: {
+      coding_style: [],
+      naming_patterns: [],
+      file_structure: [],
+      documentation: []
     },
-    key_components: analysis.architecture.key_components,
-    entry_points: analysis.entry_points,
-    metrics: analysis.metrics
-  },
+    constraints: {
+      architecture: [],
+      tech_stack: [],
+      performance: [],
+      security: []
+    },
+    quality_rules: [],
+    learnings: [],
+    _metadata: {
+      created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+      version: "1.0.0"
+    }
+  };
 
-  // Feature registry (initially empty, populated by complete)
-  features: [],
-
-  // Statistics
-  statistics: {
-    total_features: 0,
-    total_sessions: 0,
-    last_updated: new Date().toISOString()
-  },
-
-  // Analysis metadata
-  _metadata: {
-    initialized_by: "cli-explore-agent",
-    analysis_timestamp: analysis.analysis_metadata.timestamp,
-    analysis_mode: analysis.analysis_metadata.mode
-  }
-};
-
-// Helper: Generate project description
-function generateDescription(analysis) {
-  const primaryLang = analysis.technology_stack.languages.find(l => l.primary);
-  const frameworks = analysis.technology_stack.frameworks.slice(0, 2).join(', ');
-
-  return `${primaryLang.name} project using ${frameworks}`;
+  Write('.workflow/project-guidelines.json', JSON.stringify(guidelinesScaffold, null, 2));
 }
-
-// Write to .workflow/project.json
-Write('.workflow/project.json', JSON.stringify(projectMeta, null, 2));
 ```
 
-### Step 5: Output Summary
+### Step 4: Display Summary
 
-```
+```javascript
+const projectTech = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/project-tech.json'));
+const guidelinesExists = file_exists('.workflow/project-guidelines.json');
+
+console.log(`
 ✓ Project initialized successfully
 
 ## Project Overview
-Name: ${projectName}
-Description: ${overview.description}
+Name: ${projectTech.project_metadata.name}
+Description: ${projectTech.technology_analysis.description}
 
 ### Technology Stack
-Languages: ${languages.map(l => l.name).join(', ')}
-Frameworks: ${frameworks.join(', ')}
+Languages: ${projectTech.technology_analysis.languages.map(l => l.name).join(', ')}
+Frameworks: ${projectTech.technology_analysis.frameworks.join(', ')}
 
 ### Architecture
-Style: ${architecture.style}
-Components: ${key_components.length} core modules identified
-
-### Project Metrics
-Files: ${metrics.total_files}
-LOC: ${metrics.lines_of_code}
-Complexity: ${metrics.complexity}
-
-### Memory Resources
-SKILL Packages: ${memory_resources.skills.length}
-Documentation: ${memory_resources.documentation.length} project(s)
-Module Docs: ${memory_resources.module_docs.length} file(s)
-Gaps: ${memory_resources.gaps.join(', ') || 'none'}
-
-## Quick Start
-• /workflow:plan "feature description" - Start new workflow
-• /workflow:status --project - View project state
+Style: ${projectTech.technology_analysis.architecture.style}
+Components: ${projectTech.technology_analysis.key_components.length} core modules
 
 ---
-Project state saved to: .workflow/project.json
-Memory index updated: ${memory_resources.last_scanned}
+Files created:
+- Tech analysis: .workflow/project-tech.json
+- Guidelines: .workflow/project-guidelines.json ${guidelinesExists ? '(scaffold)' : ''}
+${regenerate ? '- Backup: .workflow/project-tech.json.backup' : ''}
+
+Next steps:
+- Use /workflow:session:solidify to add project guidelines
+- Use /workflow:plan to start planning
+`);
 ```
 
-## Extended project.json Schema
-
-### Complete Structure
-
-```json
-{
-  "project_name": "claude_dms3",
-  "initialized_at": "2025-01-18T10:00:00Z",
-
-  "overview": {
-    "description": "TypeScript workflow automation system with AI agent orchestration",
-    "technology_stack": {
-      "languages": [
-        {"name": "TypeScript", "file_count": 150, "primary": true},
-        {"name": "Bash", "file_count": 30, "primary": false}
-      ],
-      "frameworks": ["Node.js"],
-      "build_tools": ["npm"],
-      "test_frameworks": ["Jest"]
-    },
-    "architecture": {
-      "style": "Agent-based workflow orchestration with modular command system",
-      "layers": ["command-layer", "agent-orchestration", "cli-integration"],
-      "patterns": ["Command Pattern", "Agent Pattern", "Template Method"]
-    },
-    "key_components": [
-      {
-        "name": "Workflow Planning",
-        "path": ".claude/commands/workflow",
-        "description": "Multi-phase planning workflow with brainstorming and task generation",
-        "importance": "high"
-      },
-      {
-        "name": "Agent System",
-        "path": ".claude/agents",
-        "description": "Specialized agents for code development, testing, documentation",
-        "importance": "high"
-      },
-      {
-        "name": "CLI Tool Integration",
-        "path": ".claude/scripts",
-        "description": "Gemini, Qwen, Codex wrapper scripts for AI-powered analysis",
-        "importance": "medium"
-      }
-    ],
-    "entry_points": {
-      "main": ".claude/commands/workflow/plan.md",
-      "cli_commands": ["/workflow:plan", "/workflow:execute", "/memory:docs"],
-      "api_endpoints": []
-    },
-    "metrics": {
-      "total_files": 180,
-      "lines_of_code": 15000,
-      "module_count": 12,
-      "complexity": "medium"
-    }
-  },
-
-  "features": [],
-
-  "statistics": {
-    "total_features": 0,
-    "total_sessions": 0,
-    "last_updated": "2025-01-18T10:00:00Z"
-  },
-
-  "memory_resources": {
-    "skills": [
-      {"name": "claude_dms3", "type": "project_docs", "path": ".claude/skills/claude_dms3"},
-      {"name": "workflow-progress", "type": "workflow_progress", "path": ".claude/skills/workflow-progress"}
-    ],
-    "documentation": [
-      {
-        "name": "claude_dms3",
-        "path": ".workflow/docs/claude_dms3",
-        "has_readme": true,
-        "has_architecture": true
-      }
-    ],
-    "module_docs": [
-      ".claude/commands/workflow/CLAUDE.md",
-      ".claude/agents/CLAUDE.md"
-    ],
-    "gaps": ["tech_stack"],
-    "last_scanned": "2025-01-18T10:05:00Z"
-  },
-
-  "_metadata": {
-    "initialized_by": "cli-explore-agent",
-    "analysis_timestamp": "2025-01-18T10:00:00Z",
-    "analysis_mode": "deep-scan",
-    "memory_scan_timestamp": "2025-01-18T10:05:00Z"
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Phase 5: Discover Memory Resources
-
-**Goal**: Scan and index available SKILL packages (memory command products) using agent delegation
-
-**Invoke general-purpose agent** to discover and catalog all memory products:
-
-```javascript
-Task(
-  subagent_type="general-purpose",
-  description="Discover memory resources",
-  prompt=`
-Discover and index all memory command products: SKILL packages, documentation, and CLAUDE.md files.
-
-## Discovery Scope
-1. **SKILL Packages** (.claude/skills/) - Generated by /memory:skill-memory, /memory:tech-research, etc.
-2. **Documentation** (.workflow/docs/) - Generated by /memory:docs
-3. **Module Docs** (**/CLAUDE.md) - Generated by /memory:update-full, /memory:update-related
-
-## Discovery Tasks
-
-### 1. Scan SKILL Packages
-- List all directories in .claude/skills/
-- For each: extract name, classify type, record path
-- Types: workflow-progress | codemap-* | style-* | tech_stacks | project_docs
-
-### 2. Scan Documentation
-- List directories in .workflow/docs/
-- For each project: name, path, check README.md, ARCHITECTURE.md existence
-
-### 3. Scan CLAUDE.md Files
-- Find all **/CLAUDE.md (exclude: node_modules, .git, dist, build)
-- Return path list only
-
-### 4. Identify Gaps
-- No project SKILL? → "project_skill"
-- No documentation? → "documentation"
-- Missing tech stack SKILL? → "tech_stack"
-- No workflow-progress? → "workflow_history"
-- <10% modules have CLAUDE.md? → "module_docs_low_coverage"
-
-### 5. Return JSON:
-{
-  "skills": [
-    {"name": "claude_dms3", "type": "project_docs", "path": ".claude/skills/claude_dms3"},
-    {"name": "workflow-progress", "type": "workflow_progress", "path": ".claude/skills/workflow-progress"}
-  ],
-  "documentation": [
-    {
-      "name": "my_project",
-      "path": ".workflow/docs/my_project",
-      "has_readme": true,
-      "has_architecture": true
-    }
-  ],
-  "module_docs": [
-    "src/core/CLAUDE.md",
-    "lib/utils/CLAUDE.md"
-  ],
-  "gaps": ["tech_stack", "module_docs_low_coverage"]
-}
-
-## Context
-- Project tech stack: ${JSON.stringify(analysis.technology_stack)}
-- Check .workflow/.archives for session history
-- If directories missing, return empty state with recommendations
-  `
-)
-```
-
-**Agent Output**: JSON structure with skills, documentation, module_docs, and gaps
-
-**Update project.json**:
-```javascript
-const memoryDiscovery = JSON.parse(agentOutput);
-
-projectMeta.memory_resources = {
-  ...memoryDiscovery,
-  last_scanned: new Date().toISOString()
-};
-
-Write('.workflow/project.json', JSON.stringify(projectMeta, null, 2));
-```
-
-**Output Summary**:
-```
-Memory Resources Indexed:
-- SKILL Packages: ${skills.length}
-- Documentation: ${documentation.length} project(s)
-- Module Docs: ${module_docs.length} file(s)
-- Gaps: ${gaps.join(', ') || 'none'}
-```
-
----
-
-## Regeneration Behavior
-
-When using `--regenerate` flag:
-
-1. **Backup existing file**:
-   ```bash
-   bash(cp .workflow/project.json .workflow/project.json.backup)
-   ```
-
-2. **Preserve features array**:
-   ```javascript
-   const existingMeta = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/project.json'));
-   const preservedFeatures = existingMeta.features || [];
-   const preservedStats = existingMeta.statistics || {};
-   ```
-
-3. **Re-run cli-explore-agent analysis**
-
-4. **Re-run memory discovery (Phase 5)**
-
-5. **Merge preserved data with new analysis**:
-   ```javascript
-   const newProjectMeta = {
-     ...analysisResults,
-     features: preservedFeatures,        // Keep existing features
-     statistics: preservedStats          // Keep statistics
-   };
-   ```
-
-6. **Output**:
-   ```
-   ✓ Project analysis regenerated
-   Backup saved: .workflow/project.json.backup
-
-   Updated:
-   - Technology stack analysis
-   - Architecture overview
-   - Key components discovery
-   - Memory resources index
-
-   Preserved:
-   - ${preservedFeatures.length} existing features
-   - Session statistics
-   ```
-
 ## Error Handling
 
-### Agent Failure
-```
-If cli-explore-agent fails:
-1. Fall back to basic initialization
-2. Use get_modules_by_depth.sh for structure
-3. Create minimal project.json with placeholder overview
-4. Log warning: "Project initialized with basic analysis. Run /workflow:init --regenerate for full analysis"
-```
-
-### Missing Tools
-```
-If Gemini CLI unavailable:
-1. Agent uses Qwen fallback
-2. If both fail, use bash-only analysis
-3. Mark in _metadata: "analysis_mode": "bash-fallback"
-```
-
-### Invalid Project Root
-```
-If not in git repo and empty directory:
-1. Warn user: "Empty project detected"
-2. Create minimal project.json
-3. Suggest: "Add code files and run /workflow:init --regenerate"
-```
-
-### Memory Discovery Failures
-
-**Missing Directories**:
-```
-If .claude/skills, .workflow/docs, or CLAUDE.md files not found:
-1. Return empty state for that category
-2. Mark in gaps.missing array
-3. Continue initialization
-```
-
-**Metadata Read Failures**:
-```
-If SKILL.md files are unreadable:
-1. Include SKILL with basic info: name (from directory), type (inferred), path
-2. Log warning: "SKILL package {name} has invalid metadata"
-3. Continue with other SKILLs
-```
-
-**Coverage Check Failures**:
-```
-If unable to determine module doc coverage:
-1. Skip adding "module_docs_low_coverage" to gaps
-2. Continue with other gap checks
-```
-
-**Default Empty State**:
-```json
-{
-  "memory_resources": {
-    "skills": [],
-    "documentation": [],
-    "module_docs": [],
-    "gaps": ["project_skill", "documentation", "tech_stack", "workflow_history", "module_docs"],
-    "last_scanned": "ISO_TIMESTAMP"
-  }
-}
-```
+**Agent Failure**: Fall back to basic initialization with placeholder overview
+**Missing Tools**: Agent uses Qwen fallback or bash-only
+**Empty Project**: Create minimal JSON with all gaps identified

.claude/commands/workflow/lite-execute.md

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ AskUserQuestion({
 
 **Trigger**: User calls with file path
 
-**Input**: Path to file containing task description or Enhanced Task JSON
+**Input**: Path to file containing task description or plan.json
 
 **Step 1: Read and Detect Format**
 
@@ -103,42 +103,30 @@ fileContent = Read(filePath)
 try {
   jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
 
-  // Check if Enhanced Task JSON from lite-plan
-  if (jsonData.meta?.workflow === "lite-plan") {
-    // Extract plan data
-    planObject = {
-      summary: jsonData.context.plan.summary,
-      approach: jsonData.context.plan.approach,
-      tasks: jsonData.context.plan.tasks,
-      estimated_time: jsonData.meta.estimated_time,
-      recommended_execution: jsonData.meta.recommended_execution,
-      complexity: jsonData.meta.complexity
-    }
-    explorationContext = jsonData.context.exploration || null
-    clarificationContext = jsonData.context.clarifications || null
-    originalUserInput = jsonData.title
-
-    isEnhancedTaskJson = true
+  // Check if plan.json from lite-plan session
+  if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.tasks) {
+    planObject = jsonData
+    originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
+    isPlanJson = true
   } else {
-    // Valid JSON but not Enhanced Task JSON - treat as plain text
+    // Valid JSON but not plan.json - treat as plain text
     originalUserInput = fileContent
-    isEnhancedTaskJson = false
+    isPlanJson = false
   }
 } catch {
   // Not valid JSON - treat as plain text prompt
   originalUserInput = fileContent
-  isEnhancedTaskJson = false
+  isPlanJson = false
 }
 ```
 
 **Step 2: Create Execution Plan**
 
-If `isEnhancedTaskJson === true`:
-- Use extracted `planObject` directly
-- Skip planning, use lite-plan's existing plan
-- User still selects execution method and code review
+If `isPlanJson === true`:
+- Use `planObject` directly
+- User selects execution method and code review
 
-If `isEnhancedTaskJson === false`:
+If `isPlanJson === false`:
 - Treat file content as prompt (same behavior as Mode 2)
 - Create simple execution plan from content
 
@@ -150,26 +138,30 @@ If `isEnhancedTaskJson === false`:
 
 ## Execution Process
 
-### Workflow Overview
-
 ```
-Input Processing → Mode Detection
-    |
-    v
-[Mode 1] --in-memory: Load executionContext → Skip selection
-[Mode 2] Prompt: Create plan → User selects method + review
-[Mode 3] File: Detect format → Extract plan OR treat as prompt → User selects
-    |
-    v
-Execution & Progress Tracking
-    ├─ Step 1: Initialize execution tracking
-    ├─ Step 2: Create TodoWrite execution list
-    ├─ Step 3: Launch execution (Agent or Codex)
-    ├─ Step 4: Track execution progress
-    └─ Step 5: Code review (optional)
-    |
-    v
-Execution Complete
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --in-memory flag → Mode 1: Load executionContext → Skip user selection
+      ├─ Ends with .md/.json/.txt → Mode 3: Read file → Detect format
+      │   ├─ Valid plan.json → Use planObject → User selects method + review
+      │   └─ Not plan.json → Treat as prompt → User selects method + review
+      └─ Other → Mode 2: Prompt description → User selects method + review
+
+Execution:
+   ├─ Step 1: Initialize result tracking (previousExecutionResults = [])
+   ├─ Step 2: Task grouping & batch creation
+   │   ├─ Extract explicit depends_on (no file/keyword inference)
+   │   ├─ Group: independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+   │   ├─ Group: dependent tasks → sequential phases (respect dependencies)
+   │   └─ Create TodoWrite list for batches
+   ├─ Step 3: Launch execution
+   │   ├─ Phase 1: All independent tasks (⚡ single batch, concurrent)
+   │   └─ Phase 2+: Dependent tasks by dependency order
+   ├─ Step 4: Track progress (TodoWrite updates per batch)
+   └─ Step 5: Code review (if codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip")
+
+Output:
+   └─ Execution complete with results in previousExecutionResults[]
 ```
 
 ## Detailed Execution Steps
@@ -189,66 +181,68 @@ previousExecutionResults = []
 
 **Dependency Analysis & Grouping Algorithm**:
 ```javascript
-// Infer dependencies: same file → sequential, keywords (use/integrate) → sequential
-function inferDependencies(tasks) {
-  return tasks.map((task, i) => {
-    const deps = []
-    const file = task.file || task.title.match(/in\s+([^\s:]+)/)?.[1]
-    const keywords = (task.description || task.title).toLowerCase()
+// Use explicit depends_on from plan.json (no inference from file/keywords)
+function extractDependencies(tasks) {
+  const taskIdToIndex = {}
+  tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
 
-    for (let j = 0; j < i; j++) {
-      const prevFile = tasks[j].file || tasks[j].title.match(/in\s+([^\s:]+)/)?.[1]
-      if (file && prevFile === file) deps.push(j)  // Same file
-      else if (/use|integrate|call|import/.test(keywords)) deps.push(j)  // Keyword dependency
-    }
+  return tasks.map((task, i) => {
+    // Only use explicit depends_on from plan.json
+    const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
+      .map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
+      .filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
     return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
   })
 }
 
-// Group into batches: independent → parallel [P1,P2...], dependent → sequential [S1,S2...]
+// Group into batches: maximize parallel execution
 function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
-  const tasksWithDeps = inferDependencies(tasks)
-  const maxBatch = executionMethod === "Codex" ? 4 : 7
-  const calls = []
+  const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
   const processed = new Set()
+  const calls = []
 
-  // Parallel: independent tasks, different files, max batch size
-  const parallelGroups = []
-  tasksWithDeps.forEach(t => {
-    if (t.dependencies.length === 0 && !processed.has(t.taskIndex)) {
-      const group = [t]
-      processed.add(t.taskIndex)
-      tasksWithDeps.forEach(o => {
-        if (!o.dependencies.length && !processed.has(o.taskIndex) &&
-            group.length < maxBatch && t.file !== o.file) {
-          group.push(o)
-          processed.add(o.taskIndex)
-        }
-      })
-      parallelGroups.push(group)
-    }
-  })
-
-  // Sequential: dependent tasks, batch when deps satisfied
-  const remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
-  while (remaining.length > 0) {
-    const batch = remaining.filter((t, i) =>
-      i < maxBatch && t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
-    )
-    if (!batch.length) break
-    batch.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
-    calls.push({ executionType: "sequential", groupId: `S${calls.length + 1}`, tasks: batch })
-    remaining.splice(0, remaining.length, ...remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex)))
+  // Phase 1: All independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+  const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
+  if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
+    independentTasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: "parallel",
+      groupId: "P1",
+      taskSummary: independentTasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '),
+      tasks: independentTasks
+    })
   }
 
-  // Combine results
-  return [
-    ...parallelGroups.map((g, i) => ({
-      method: executionMethod, executionType: "parallel", groupId: `P${i+1}`,
-      taskSummary: g.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks: g
-    })),
-    ...calls.map(c => ({ ...c, method: executionMethod, taskSummary: c.tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' → ') }))
-  ]
+  // Phase 2: Dependent tasks → sequential batches (respect dependencies)
+  let sequentialIndex = 1
+  let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+
+  while (remaining.length > 0) {
+    // Find tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied
+    const ready = remaining.filter(t =>
+      t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
+    )
+
+    if (ready.length === 0) {
+      console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining tasks')
+      ready.push(...remaining)
+    }
+
+    // Group ready tasks (can run in parallel within this phase)
+    ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: ready.length > 1 ? "parallel" : "sequential",
+      groupId: ready.length > 1 ? `P${calls.length + 1}` : `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
+      taskSummary: ready.map(t => t.title).join(ready.length > 1 ? ' | ' : ' → '),
+      tasks: ready
+    })
+
+    remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+  }
+
+  return calls
 }
 
 executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(planObject.tasks, executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
@@ -264,6 +258,33 @@ TodoWrite({
 
 ### Step 3: Launch Execution
 
+**Executor Resolution** (任务级 executor 优先于全局设置):
+```javascript
+// 获取任务的 executor（优先使用 executorAssignments，fallback 到全局 executionMethod）
+function getTaskExecutor(task) {
+  const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
+  if (assignments[task.id]) {
+    return assignments[task.id].executor  // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
+  }
+  // Fallback: 全局 executionMethod 映射
+  const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
+  if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
+  if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
+  // Auto: 根据复杂度
+  return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex'
+}
+
+// 按 executor 分组任务
+function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
+  const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    const executor = getTaskExecutor(task)
+    groups[executor].push(task)
+  })
+  return groups
+}
+```
+
 **Execution Flow**: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
 ```javascript
 const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
@@ -286,73 +307,73 @@ for (const call of sequential) {
 }
 ```
 
+### Unified Task Prompt Builder
+
+**Task Formatting Principle**: Each task is a self-contained checklist. The executor only needs to know what THIS task requires. Same template for Agent and CLI.
+
+```javascript
+function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
+  // Task template (4 parts: Modification Points → How → Reference → Done)
+  const formatTask = (t) => `
+## ${t.title}
+
+**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\`  |  **Action**: ${t.action}
+
+### Modification Points
+${t.modification_points.map(p => `- **${p.file}** → \`${p.target}\`: ${p.change}`).join('\n')}
+
+### How to do it
+${t.description}
+
+${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
+
+### Reference
+- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
+- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
+${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}
+
+### Done when
+${t.acceptance.map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}`
+
+  // Build prompt
+  const sections = []
+
+  if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
+
+  sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)
+
+  // Context (reference only)
+  const context = []
+  if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
+    context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+  if (clarificationContext) {
+    context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+  if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
+    context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
+  }
+  if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)
+
+  sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
+
+  return sections.join('\n\n')
+}
+```
+
 **Option A: Agent Execution**
 
 When to use:
-- `executionMethod = "Agent"`
-- `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"`
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "agent"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Agent"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"` (全局 fallback)
 
-Agent call format:
 ```javascript
-function formatTaskForAgent(task, index) {
-  return `
-### Task ${index + 1}: ${task.title}
-**File**: ${task.file}
-**Action**: ${task.action}
-**Description**: ${task.description}
-
-**Implementation Steps**:
-${task.implementation.map((step, i) => `${i + 1}. ${step}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Reference**:
-- Pattern: ${task.reference.pattern}
-- Example Files: ${task.reference.files.join(', ')}
-- Guidance: ${task.reference.examples}
-
-**Acceptance Criteria**:
-${task.acceptance.map((criterion, i) => `${i + 1}. ${criterion}`).join('\n')}
-`
-}
-
 Task(
   subagent_type="code-developer",
-  description="Implement planned tasks",
-  prompt=`
-  ${originalUserInput ? `## Original User Request\n${originalUserInput}\n\n` : ''}
-
-  ## Implementation Plan
-
-  **Summary**: ${planObject.summary}
-  **Approach**: ${planObject.approach}
-
-  ## Task Breakdown (${planObject.tasks.length} tasks)
-  ${planObject.tasks.map((task, i) => formatTaskForAgent(task, i)).join('\n')}
-
-  ${previousExecutionResults.length > 0 ? `\n## Previous Execution Results\n${previousExecutionResults.map(result => `
-[${result.executionId}] ${result.status}
-Tasks: ${result.tasksSummary}
-Completion: ${result.completionSummary}
-Outputs: ${result.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
-${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
-  `).join('\n---\n')}` : ''}
-
-  ## Code Context
-  ${explorationContext || "No exploration performed"}
-
-  ${clarificationContext ? `\n## Clarifications\n${JSON.stringify(clarificationContext, null, 2)}` : ''}
-
-  ${executionContext?.session?.artifacts ? `\n## Planning Artifacts
-  Detailed planning context available in:
-  ${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration ? `- Exploration: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration}` : ''}
-  - Plan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
-  - Task: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}
-
-  Read these files for detailed architecture, patterns, and constraints.` : ''}
-
-  ## Requirements
-  MUST complete ALL ${planObject.tasks.length} tasks listed above in this single execution.
-  Return only after all tasks are fully implemented and tested.
-  `
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=batch.taskSummary,
+  prompt=buildExecutionPrompt(batch)
 )
 ```
 
@@ -361,92 +382,75 @@ ${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
 **Option B: CLI Execution (Codex)**
 
 When to use:
-- `executionMethod = "Codex"`
-- `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium" or "High"`
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "codex"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Codex"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium/High"` (全局 fallback)
 
-**Artifact Path Delegation**:
-- Include artifact file paths in CLI prompt for enhanced context
-- Codex can read artifact files for detailed planning information
-- Example: Reference exploration.json for architecture patterns
-
-Command format:
 ```bash
-function formatTaskForCodex(task, index) {
-  return `
-${index + 1}. ${task.title} (${task.file})
-   Action: ${task.action}
-   What: ${task.description}
-   How:
-${task.implementation.map((step, i) => `   ${i + 1}. ${step}`).join('\n')}
-   Reference: ${task.reference.pattern} (see ${task.reference.files.join(', ')})
-   Guidance: ${task.reference.examples}
-   Verify:
-${task.acceptance.map((criterion, i) => `   - ${criterion}`).join('\n')}
-`
-}
-
-codex --full-auto exec "
-${originalUserInput ? `## Original User Request\n${originalUserInput}\n\n` : ''}
-
-## Implementation Plan
-
-TASK: ${planObject.summary}
-APPROACH: ${planObject.approach}
-
-### Task Breakdown (${planObject.tasks.length} tasks)
-${planObject.tasks.map((task, i) => formatTaskForCodex(task, i)).join('\n')}
-
-${previousExecutionResults.length > 0 ? `\n### Previous Execution Results\n${previousExecutionResults.map(result => `
-[${result.executionId}] ${result.status}
-Tasks: ${result.tasksSummary}
-Status: ${result.completionSummary}
-Outputs: ${result.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
-${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
-`).join('\n---\n')}
-
-IMPORTANT: Review previous results. Build on completed work. Avoid duplication.
-` : ''}
-
-### Code Context from Exploration
-${explorationContext ? `
-Project Structure: ${explorationContext.project_structure || 'Standard structure'}
-Relevant Files: ${explorationContext.relevant_files?.join(', ') || 'TBD'}
-Current Patterns: ${explorationContext.patterns || 'Follow existing conventions'}
-Integration Points: ${explorationContext.dependencies || 'None specified'}
-Constraints: ${explorationContext.constraints || 'None'}
-` : 'No prior exploration - analyze codebase as needed'}
-
-${clarificationContext ? `\n### User Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}` : ''}
-
-${executionContext?.session?.artifacts ? `\n### Planning Artifact Files
-Detailed planning context available in session folder:
-${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration ? `- Exploration: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration}` : ''}
-- Plan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
-- Task: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}
-
-Read these files for complete architecture details, code patterns, and integration constraints.
-` : ''}
-
-## Requirements
-MUST complete ALL ${planObject.tasks.length} tasks listed above in this single execution.
-Return only after all tasks are fully implemented and tested.
-
-Complexity: ${planObject.complexity}
-" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write
 ```
 
-**Execution with tracking**:
+**Execution with fixed IDs** (predictable ID pattern):
 ```javascript
 // Launch CLI in foreground (NOT background)
+// Timeout based on complexity: Low=40min, Medium=60min, High=100min
+const timeoutByComplexity = {
+  "Low": 2400000,    // 40 minutes
+  "Medium": 3600000, // 60 minutes
+  "High": 6000000    // 100 minutes
+}
+
+// Generate fixed execution ID: ${sessionId}-${groupId}
+// This enables predictable ID lookup without relying on resume context chains
+const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
+const fixedExecutionId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`  // e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
+
+// Check if resuming from previous failed execution
+const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
+
+// Build command with fixed ID (and optional resume for continuation)
+const cli_command = previousCliId
+  ? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
+  : `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}`
+
 bash_result = Bash(
   command=cli_command,
-  timeout=600000  // 10 minutes
+  timeout=timeoutByComplexity[planObject.complexity] || 3600000
 )
 
+// Execution ID is now predictable: ${fixedExecutionId}
+// Can also extract from output: "ID: implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
+const cliExecutionId = fixedExecutionId
+
 // Update TodoWrite when execution completes
 ```
 
-**Result Collection**: After completion, analyze output and collect result following `executionResult` structure
+**Resume on Failure** (with fixed ID):
+```javascript
+// If execution failed or timed out, offer resume option
+if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
+  console.log(`
+⚠️ Execution incomplete. Resume available:
+   Fixed ID: ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Lookup: ccw cli detail ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue tasks" --resume ${fixedExecutionId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}-retry
+`)
+
+  // Store for potential retry in same session
+  batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedExecutionId
+}
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, analyze output and collect result following `executionResult` structure (include `cliExecutionId` for resume capability)
+
+**Option C: CLI Execution (Gemini)**
+
+When to use: `getTaskExecutor(task) === "gemini"` (分析类任务)
+
+```bash
+# 使用统一的 buildExecutionPrompt，切换 tool 和 mode
+ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}
+```
 
 ### Step 4: Progress Tracking
 
@@ -456,64 +460,130 @@ Progress tracked at batch level (not individual task level). Icons: ⚡ (paralle
 
 **Skip Condition**: Only run if `codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip"`
 
-**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against task.json acceptance criteria
-- Read task.json from session artifacts for acceptance criteria
+**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against plan acceptance criteria
+- Read plan.json for task acceptance criteria
 - Check each acceptance criterion is fulfilled
 - Validate code quality and identify issues
 - Ensure alignment with planned approach
 
 **Operations**:
-- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review (read task.json for acceptance criteria)
-- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt (task.json in CONTEXT)
-- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, codex, etc.) with task.json reference
+- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review
+- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt
+- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, codex, etc.)
 
 **Unified Review Template** (All tools use same standard):
 
 **Review Criteria**:
-- **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify each criterion from task.json `context.acceptance`
+- **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify each criterion from plan.tasks[].acceptance
 - **Code Quality**: Analyze quality, identify issues, suggest improvements
 - **Plan Alignment**: Validate implementation matches planned approach
 
 **Shared Prompt Template** (used by all CLI tools):
 ```
-PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against task.json acceptance criteria
-TASK: • Verify task.json acceptance criteria fulfillment • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence
+PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against plan acceptance criteria
+TASK: • Verify plan acceptance criteria fulfillment • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence
 MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/* @{task.json} @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against task.json requirements
-EXPECTED: Quality assessment with acceptance criteria verification, issue identification, and recommendations. Explicitly check each acceptance criterion from task.json.
-RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on task.json acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
+CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements
+EXPECTED: Quality assessment with acceptance criteria verification, issue identification, and recommendations. Explicitly check each acceptance criterion from plan.json tasks.
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on plan acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
 ```
 
 **Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
 
 ```bash
 # Method 1: Agent Review (current agent)
-# - Read task.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}
+# - Read plan.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
 # - Apply unified review criteria (see Shared Prompt Template)
 # - Report findings directly
 
 # Method 2: Gemini Review (recommended)
-gemini -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]"
-# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${task.json} @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool gemini --mode analysis
+# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
 
 # Method 3: Qwen Review (alternative)
-qwen -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]"
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool qwen --mode analysis
 # Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
 
 # Method 4: Codex Review (autonomous)
-codex --full-auto exec "[Verify task.json acceptance criteria at ${task.json}]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
+ccw cli -p "[Verify plan acceptance criteria at ${plan.json}]" --tool codex --mode write
+```
+
+**Multi-Round Review with Fixed IDs**:
+```javascript
+// Generate fixed review ID
+const reviewId = `${sessionId}-review`
+
+// First review pass with fixed ID
+const reviewResult = Bash(`ccw cli -p "[Review prompt]" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}`)
+
+// If issues found, continue review dialog with fixed ID chain
+if (hasUnresolvedIssues(reviewResult)) {
+  // Resume with follow-up questions
+  Bash(`ccw cli -p "Clarify the security concerns you mentioned" --resume ${reviewId} --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}-followup`)
+}
 ```
 
 **Implementation Note**: Replace `[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]` placeholder with actual template content, substituting:
-- `@{task.json}` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}`
 - `@{plan.json}` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`
-- `[@{exploration.json}]` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration}` (if exists)
+- `[@{exploration.json}]` → exploration files from artifacts (if exists)
+
+### Step 6: Update Development Index
+
+**Trigger**: After all executions complete (regardless of code review)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skip if `.workflow/project.json` does not exist
+
+**Operations**:
+```javascript
+const projectJsonPath = '.workflow/project.json'
+if (!fileExists(projectJsonPath)) return  // Silent skip
+
+const projectJson = JSON.parse(Read(projectJsonPath))
+
+// Initialize if needed
+if (!projectJson.development_index) {
+  projectJson.development_index = { feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: [] }
+}
+
+// Detect category from keywords
+function detectCategory(text) {
+  text = text.toLowerCase()
+  if (/\b(fix|bug|error|issue|crash)\b/.test(text)) return 'bugfix'
+  if (/\b(refactor|cleanup|reorganize)\b/.test(text)) return 'refactor'
+  if (/\b(doc|readme|comment)\b/.test(text)) return 'docs'
+  if (/\b(add|new|create|implement)\b/.test(text)) return 'feature'
+  return 'enhancement'
+}
+
+// Detect sub_feature from task file paths
+function detectSubFeature(tasks) {
+  const dirs = tasks.map(t => t.file?.split('/').slice(-2, -1)[0]).filter(Boolean)
+  const counts = dirs.reduce((a, d) => { a[d] = (a[d] || 0) + 1; return a }, {})
+  return Object.entries(counts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])[0]?.[0] || 'general'
+}
+
+const category = detectCategory(`${planObject.summary} ${planObject.approach}`)
+const entry = {
+  title: planObject.summary.slice(0, 60),
+  sub_feature: detectSubFeature(planObject.tasks),
+  date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],
+  description: planObject.approach.slice(0, 100),
+  status: previousExecutionResults.every(r => r.status === 'completed') ? 'completed' : 'partial',
+  session_id: executionContext?.session?.id || null
+}
+
+projectJson.development_index[category].push(entry)
+projectJson.statistics.last_updated = new Date().toISOString()
+Write(projectJsonPath, JSON.stringify(projectJson, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`✓ Development index: [${category}] ${entry.title}`)
+```
 
 ## Best Practices
 
 **Input Modes**: In-memory (lite-plan), prompt (standalone), file (JSON/text)
-**Batch Limits**: Agent 7 tasks, CLI 4 tasks
-**Execution**: Parallel batches use single Claude message with multiple tool calls (no concurrency limit)
+**Task Grouping**: Based on explicit depends_on only; independent tasks run in single parallel batch
+**Execution**: All independent tasks launch concurrently via single Claude message with multiple tool calls
 
 ## Error Handling
 
@@ -524,8 +594,10 @@ codex --full-auto exec "[Verify task.json acceptance criteria at ${task.json}]"
 | Empty file | File exists but no content | Error: "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
 | Invalid Enhanced Task JSON | JSON missing required fields | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
 | Malformed JSON | JSON parsing fails | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
-| Execution failure | Agent/Codex crashes | Display error, save partial progress, suggest retry |
+| Execution failure | Agent/Codex crashes | Display error, use fixed ID `${sessionId}-${groupId}` for resume: `ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume <fixed-id> --id <fixed-id>-retry` |
+| Execution timeout | CLI exceeded timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
 | Codex unavailable | Codex not installed | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
+| Fixed ID not found | Custom ID lookup failed | Check `ccw cli history`, verify date directories |
 
 ## Data Structures
 
@@ -543,20 +615,27 @@ Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
     recommended_execution: string,
     complexity: string
   },
-  explorationContext: {...} | null,
+  explorationsContext: {...} | null,       // Multi-angle explorations
+  explorationAngles: string[],             // List of exploration angles
+  explorationManifest: {...} | null,       // Exploration manifest
   clarificationContext: {...} | null,
-  executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",
+  executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",  // 全局默认
   codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Agent Review" | string,
   originalUserInput: string,
 
+  // 任务级 executor 分配（优先于 executionMethod）
+  executorAssignments: {
+    [taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
+  },
+
   // Session artifacts location (saved by lite-plan)
   session: {
     id: string,                        // Session identifier: {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
     folder: string,                    // Session folder path: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
     artifacts: {
-      exploration: string | null,      // exploration.json path (if exploration performed)
-      plan: string,                    // plan.json path (always present)
-      task: string                     // task.json path (always exported)
+      explorations: [{angle, path}],   // exploration-{angle}.json paths
+      explorations_manifest: string,   // explorations-manifest.json path
+      plan: string                     // plan.json path (always present)
     }
   }
 }
@@ -578,8 +657,20 @@ Collected after each execution call completes:
   tasksSummary: string,                // Brief description of tasks handled
   completionSummary: string,           // What was completed
   keyOutputs: string,                  // Files created/modified, key changes
-  notes: string                        // Important context for next execution
+  notes: string,                       // Important context for next execution
+  fixedCliId: string | null            // Fixed CLI execution ID (e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1")
 }
 ```
 
 Appended to `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity in multi-execution scenarios.
+
+**Fixed ID Pattern**: `${sessionId}-${groupId}` enables predictable lookup without auto-generated timestamps.
+
+**Resume Usage**: If `status` is "partial" or "failed", use `fixedCliId` to resume:
+```bash
+# Lookup previous execution
+ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
+
+# Resume with new fixed ID for retry
+ccw cli -p "Continue from where we left off" --resume ${fixedCliId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedCliId}-retry
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/lite-lite-lite.md

@@ -0,0 +1,798 @@
+---
+name: workflow:lite-lite-lite
+description: Ultra-lightweight multi-tool analysis and direct execution. No artifacts, auto tool selection based on task analysis, user-driven iteration via AskUser.
+argument-hint: "<task description>"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Bash(*), mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*)
+---
+
+# Ultra-Lite Multi-Tool Workflow
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Basic usage
+/workflow:lite-lite-lite "Fix the login bug"
+
+# Complex task
+/workflow:lite-lite-lite "Refactor payment module for multi-gateway support"
+```
+
+**Core Philosophy**: Minimal friction, maximum velocity. No files, no artifacts - just analyze and execute.
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+
+**Zero-artifact workflow**: Clarify requirements → Auto-select tools → Mixed tool analysis → User decision → Direct execution. All state in memory, all decisions via AskUser.
+
+**vs multi-cli-plan**:
+- **multi-cli-plan**: Full artifacts (IMPL_PLAN.md, plan.json, synthesis.json)
+- **lite-lite-lite**: No files, direct in-memory flow, immediate execution
+
+### Value Proposition
+
+1. **Ultra-Fast**: No file I/O overhead, no session management
+2. **Smart Selection**: Auto-select optimal tool combination based on task
+3. **Interactive**: Key decisions validated via AskUser
+4. **Direct**: Analysis → Execution without intermediate artifacts
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Clarify Requirements
+   └─ Parse input → AskUser for missing details (if needed)
+
+Phase 2: Auto-Select Tools
+   └─ Analyze task → Match to tool strengths → Confirm selection
+
+Phase 3: Mixed Tool Analysis
+   └─ Execute selected tools in parallel → Aggregate results
+
+Phase 4: User Decision
+   ├─ Present analysis summary
+   ├─ AskUser: Execute / Refine / Change tools / Cancel
+   └─ Loop to Phase 3 if refinement needed
+
+Phase 5: Direct Execution
+   └─ Execute solution directly (no plan files)
+```
+
+## Phase Details
+
+### Phase 1: Clarify Requirements
+
+**Parse Task Description**:
+```javascript
+// Extract intent from user input
+const taskDescription = $ARGUMENTS
+
+// Check if clarification needed
+if (taskDescription.length < 20 || isAmbiguous(taskDescription)) {
+  AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: "Please provide more details: target files/modules, expected behavior, constraints?",
+      header: "Details",
+      options: [
+        { label: "I'll provide more", description: "Add more context" },
+        { label: "Continue analysis", description: "Let tools explore autonomously" }
+      ],
+      multiSelect: false
+    }]
+  })
+}
+```
+
+**Quick ACE Context** (optional, for complex tasks):
+```javascript
+// Only if task seems to need codebase context
+mcp__ace-tool__search_context({
+  project_root_path: process.cwd(),
+  query: `${taskDescription} implementation patterns`
+})
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Auto-Select Analysis Tools
+
+**Tool Categories**:
+
+| Category | Source | Execution |
+|----------|--------|-----------|
+| **CLI Tools** | cli-tools.json | `ccw cli -p "..." --tool <name>` |
+| **Sub Agents** | Task tool | `Task({ subagent_type: "...", prompt: "..." })` |
+
+**Task Analysis Dimensions**:
+```javascript
+function analyzeTask(taskDescription) {
+  return {
+    complexity: detectComplexity(taskDescription),  // simple, medium, complex
+    taskType: detectTaskType(taskDescription),      // bugfix, feature, refactor, analysis, etc.
+    domain: detectDomain(taskDescription),          // frontend, backend, fullstack
+    needsExecution: detectExecutionNeed(taskDescription)  // analysis-only vs needs-write
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**CLI Tools** (dynamically loaded from cli-tools.json):
+
+```javascript
+// Load CLI tools from config file
+const cliConfig = JSON.parse(Read("~/.claude/cli-tools.json"))
+const cliTools = Object.entries(cliConfig.tools)
+  .filter(([_, config]) => config.enabled)
+  .map(([name, config]) => ({
+    name,
+    type: 'cli',
+    tags: config.tags || [],
+    model: config.primaryModel,
+    toolType: config.type  // builtin, cli-wrapper, api-endpoint
+  }))
+```
+
+**Tags** (user-defined in cli-tools.json, no fixed specification):
+
+Tags are completely user-defined. Users can create any tags that match their workflow needs.
+
+**Config Example** (cli-tools.json):
+```json
+{
+  "tools": {
+    "gemini": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "tags": ["architecture", "reasoning", "performance"],
+      "primaryModel": "gemini-2.5-pro"
+    },
+    "codex": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "tags": ["implementation", "fast"],
+      "primaryModel": "gpt-5.2"
+    },
+    "qwen": {
+      "enabled": true,
+      "tags": ["implementation", "chinese", "documentation"],
+      "primaryModel": "coder-model"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Sub Agents** (predefined, canExecute marks execution capability):
+
+```javascript
+const agents = [
+  { name: 'code-developer', type: 'agent', strength: 'Code implementation, test writing', canExecute: true },
+  { name: 'Explore', type: 'agent', strength: 'Fast code exploration', canExecute: false },
+  { name: 'cli-explore-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Dual-source deep analysis', canExecute: false },
+  { name: 'cli-discuss-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Multi-CLI collaborative verification', canExecute: false },
+  { name: 'debug-explore-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Hypothesis-driven debugging', canExecute: false },
+  { name: 'context-search-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Context collection', canExecute: false },
+  { name: 'test-fix-agent', type: 'agent', strength: 'Test execution and fixing', canExecute: true },
+  { name: 'universal-executor', type: 'agent', strength: 'General multi-step execution', canExecute: true }
+]
+```
+
+| Agent | Strengths | canExecute |
+|-------|-----------|------------|
+| **code-developer** | Code implementation, test writing, incremental development | ✅ |
+| **Explore** | Fast code exploration, file search, pattern discovery | ❌ |
+| **cli-explore-agent** | Dual-source analysis (Bash+CLI), read-only exploration | ❌ |
+| **cli-discuss-agent** | Multi-CLI collaboration, cross-verification, solution synthesis | ❌ |
+| **debug-explore-agent** | Hypothesis-driven debugging, NDJSON logging, iterative verification | ❌ |
+| **context-search-agent** | Multi-layer file discovery, dependency analysis, conflict assessment | ❌ |
+| **test-fix-agent** | Test execution, failure diagnosis, code fixing | ✅ |
+| **universal-executor** | General execution, multi-domain adaptation | ✅ |
+
+**Three-Step Selection Flow** (CLI → Mode → Agent):
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Present CLI options from config (multiSelect for multi-CLI modes)
+function getCliDescription(cli) {
+  return cli.tags.length > 0 ? cli.tags.join(', ') : cli.model || 'general'
+}
+
+const cliOptions = cliTools.map(cli => ({
+  label: cli.name,
+  description: getCliDescription(cli)
+}))
+
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Select CLI tools for analysis (select 1-3 for collaboration modes)",
+    header: "CLI Tools",
+    options: cliOptions,
+    multiSelect: true  // Allow multiple selection for collaboration modes
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+```javascript
+// Step 2: Select Analysis Mode
+const analysisModes = [
+  {
+    name: 'parallel',
+    label: 'Parallel',
+    description: 'All CLIs analyze simultaneously, aggregate results',
+    minCLIs: 1,
+    pattern: 'A || B || C → Aggregate'
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'sequential',
+    label: 'Sequential',
+    description: 'Chain analysis: each CLI builds on previous via --resume',
+    minCLIs: 2,
+    pattern: 'A → B(resume A) → C(resume B)'
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'collaborative',
+    label: 'Collaborative',
+    description: 'Multi-round synthesis: CLIs take turns refining analysis',
+    minCLIs: 2,
+    pattern: 'A → B(resume A) → A(resume B) → Synthesize'
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'debate',
+    label: 'Debate',
+    description: 'Adversarial: CLI B challenges CLI A findings, A responds',
+    minCLIs: 2,
+    pattern: 'A(propose) → B(challenge, resume A) → A(defend, resume B)'
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'challenge',
+    label: 'Challenge',
+    description: 'Stress test: CLI B finds flaws/alternatives in CLI A analysis',
+    minCLIs: 2,
+    pattern: 'A(analyze) → B(challenge, resume A) → Evaluate'
+  }
+]
+
+// Filter modes based on selected CLI count
+const availableModes = analysisModes.filter(m => selectedCLIs.length >= m.minCLIs)
+
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Select analysis mode",
+    header: "Mode",
+    options: availableModes.map(m => ({
+      label: m.label,
+      description: `${m.description} [${m.pattern}]`
+    })),
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+```javascript
+// Step 3: Present Agent options for execution
+const agentOptions = agents.map(agent => ({
+  label: agent.name,
+  description: agent.strength
+}))
+
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Select Sub Agent for execution",
+    header: "Agent",
+    options: agentOptions,
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Selection Summary**:
+```javascript
+console.log(`
+## Selected Configuration
+
+**CLI Tools**: ${selectedCLIs.map(c => c.name).join(' → ')}
+**Analysis Mode**: ${selectedMode.label} - ${selectedMode.pattern}
+**Execution Agent**: ${selectedAgent.name} - ${selectedAgent.strength}
+
+> Mode determines how CLIs collaborate, Agent handles final execution
+`)
+
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Confirm selection?",
+    header: "Confirm",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Confirm and continue", description: `${selectedMode.label} mode with ${selectedCLIs.length} CLIs` },
+      { label: "Re-select CLIs", description: "Choose different CLI tools" },
+      { label: "Re-select Mode", description: "Choose different analysis mode" },
+      { label: "Re-select Agent", description: "Choose different Sub Agent" }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Multi-Mode Analysis
+
+**Mode-Specific Execution Patterns**:
+
+#### Mode 1: Parallel (并行)
+```javascript
+// All CLIs run simultaneously, no resume dependency
+async function executeParallel(clis, taskDescription) {
+  const promises = clis.map(cli => Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Analyze and provide solution for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • Identify affected files • Analyze implementation approach • List specific changes needed
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: Concise analysis with: 1) Root cause/approach 2) Files to modify 3) Key changes 4) Risks
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Focus on actionable insights
+" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis`,
+    run_in_background: true
+  }))
+
+  return await Promise.all(promises)
+}
+```
+
+#### Mode 2: Sequential (串联)
+```javascript
+// Chain analysis: each CLI builds on previous via --resume
+async function executeSequential(clis, taskDescription) {
+  const results = []
+  let previousSessionId = null
+
+  for (const cli of clis) {
+    const resumeFlag = previousSessionId ? `--resume ${previousSessionId}` : ''
+
+    const result = await Bash({
+      command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: ${previousSessionId ? 'Build on previous analysis and deepen' : 'Initial analysis'}: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • ${previousSessionId ? 'Review previous findings • Extend analysis • Add new insights' : 'Identify affected files • Analyze implementation approach'}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: ${previousSessionId ? 'Extended analysis building on previous findings' : 'Initial analysis with root cause and approach'}
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | ${previousSessionId ? 'Build incrementally, avoid repetition' : 'Focus on actionable insights'}
+" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis ${resumeFlag}`,
+      run_in_background: false
+    })
+
+    results.push(result)
+    previousSessionId = extractSessionId(result)  // Extract session ID for next iteration
+  }
+
+  return results
+}
+```
+
+#### Mode 3: Collaborative (协同)
+```javascript
+// Multi-round synthesis: CLIs take turns refining analysis
+async function executeCollaborative(clis, taskDescription, rounds = 2) {
+  const results = []
+  let previousSessionId = null
+
+  for (let round = 0; round < rounds; round++) {
+    for (const cli of clis) {
+      const resumeFlag = previousSessionId ? `--resume ${previousSessionId}` : ''
+      const roundContext = round === 0 ? 'Initial analysis' : `Round ${round + 1}: Refine and synthesize`
+
+      const result = await Bash({
+        command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: ${roundContext} for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • ${round === 0 ? 'Initial analysis of the problem' : 'Review previous analysis • Identify gaps • Add complementary insights • Synthesize findings'}
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: ${round === 0 ? 'Foundational analysis' : 'Refined synthesis with new perspectives'}
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | ${round === 0 ? 'Be thorough' : 'Build collaboratively, add value not repetition'}
+" --tool ${cli.name} --mode analysis ${resumeFlag}`,
+        run_in_background: false
+      })
+
+      results.push({ cli: cli.name, round, result })
+      previousSessionId = extractSessionId(result)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return results
+}
+```
+
+#### Mode 4: Debate (辩论)
+```javascript
+// Adversarial: CLI B challenges CLI A findings, A responds
+async function executeDebate(clis, taskDescription) {
+  const [cliA, cliB] = clis
+  const results = []
+
+  // Step 1: CLI A proposes initial analysis
+  const proposeResult = await Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Propose comprehensive analysis for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • Analyze problem thoroughly • Propose solution approach • Identify implementation details • State assumptions clearly
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: Well-reasoned proposal with clear assumptions and trade-offs stated
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be clear about assumptions and trade-offs
+" --tool ${cliA.name} --mode analysis`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  })
+  results.push({ phase: 'propose', cli: cliA.name, result: proposeResult })
+  const proposeSessionId = extractSessionId(proposeResult)
+
+  // Step 2: CLI B challenges the proposal
+  const challengeResult = await Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Challenge and stress-test the previous analysis for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • Identify weaknesses in proposed approach • Question assumptions • Suggest alternative approaches • Highlight potential risks overlooked
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: Constructive critique with specific counter-arguments and alternatives
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be adversarial but constructive, focus on improving the solution
+" --tool ${cliB.name} --mode analysis --resume ${proposeSessionId}`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  })
+  results.push({ phase: 'challenge', cli: cliB.name, result: challengeResult })
+  const challengeSessionId = extractSessionId(challengeResult)
+
+  // Step 3: CLI A defends and refines
+  const defendResult = await Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Respond to challenges and refine analysis for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • Address each challenge point • Defend valid aspects • Acknowledge valid criticisms • Propose refined solution incorporating feedback
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: Refined proposal that addresses criticisms and incorporates valid alternatives
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be open to valid criticism, synthesize best ideas
+" --tool ${cliA.name} --mode analysis --resume ${challengeSessionId}`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  })
+  results.push({ phase: 'defend', cli: cliA.name, result: defendResult })
+
+  return results
+}
+```
+
+#### Mode 5: Challenge (挑战)
+```javascript
+// Stress test: CLI B finds flaws/alternatives in CLI A analysis
+async function executeChallenge(clis, taskDescription) {
+  const [cliA, cliB] = clis
+  const results = []
+
+  // Step 1: CLI A provides initial analysis
+  const analyzeResult = await Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Provide comprehensive analysis for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • Deep analysis of problem space • Propose implementation approach • List specific changes • Identify risks
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: Thorough analysis with clear reasoning
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be thorough and explicit about reasoning
+" --tool ${cliA.name} --mode analysis`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  })
+  results.push({ phase: 'analyze', cli: cliA.name, result: analyzeResult })
+  const analyzeSessionId = extractSessionId(analyzeResult)
+
+  // Step 2: CLI B challenges with focus on finding flaws
+  const challengeResult = await Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Stress-test and find weaknesses in the analysis for: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: • Find logical flaws in reasoning • Identify missed edge cases • Propose better alternatives • Rate confidence in each criticism (High/Medium/Low)
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/*
+EXPECTED: Detailed critique with severity ratings: [CRITICAL] [HIGH] [MEDIUM] [LOW] for each issue found
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Be ruthlessly critical, find every possible flaw
+" --tool ${cliB.name} --mode analysis --resume ${analyzeSessionId}`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  })
+  results.push({ phase: 'challenge', cli: cliB.name, result: challengeResult })
+
+  return results
+}
+```
+
+**Mode Router**:
+```javascript
+async function executeAnalysis(mode, clis, taskDescription) {
+  switch (mode.name) {
+    case 'parallel':
+      return await executeParallel(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'sequential':
+      return await executeSequential(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'collaborative':
+      return await executeCollaborative(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'debate':
+      return await executeDebate(clis, taskDescription)
+    case 'challenge':
+      return await executeChallenge(clis, taskDescription)
+    default:
+      return await executeParallel(clis, taskDescription)
+  }
+}
+
+// Execute based on selected mode
+const analysisResults = await executeAnalysis(selectedMode, selectedCLIs, taskDescription)
+```
+
+**Result Aggregation** (mode-aware):
+```javascript
+function aggregateResults(mode, results) {
+  const base = {
+    mode: mode.name,
+    pattern: mode.pattern,
+    tools_used: results.map(r => r.cli || 'unknown')
+  }
+
+  switch (mode.name) {
+    case 'parallel':
+      return {
+        ...base,
+        findings: results.map(r => parseOutput(r)),
+        consensus: findCommonPoints(results),
+        divergences: findDifferences(results)
+      }
+
+    case 'sequential':
+      return {
+        ...base,
+        evolution: results.map((r, i) => ({ step: i + 1, analysis: parseOutput(r) })),
+        finalAnalysis: parseOutput(results[results.length - 1])
+      }
+
+    case 'collaborative':
+      return {
+        ...base,
+        rounds: groupByRound(results),
+        synthesis: extractSynthesis(results[results.length - 1])
+      }
+
+    case 'debate':
+      return {
+        ...base,
+        proposal: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'propose')?.result),
+        challenges: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'challenge')?.result),
+        resolution: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'defend')?.result),
+        confidence: calculateDebateConfidence(results)
+      }
+
+    case 'challenge':
+      return {
+        ...base,
+        originalAnalysis: parseOutput(results.find(r => r.phase === 'analyze')?.result),
+        critiques: parseCritiques(results.find(r => r.phase === 'challenge')?.result),
+        riskScore: calculateRiskScore(results)
+      }
+  }
+}
+
+const aggregatedAnalysis = aggregateResults(selectedMode, analysisResults)
+```
+
+### Phase 4: User Decision
+
+**Present Mode-Specific Summary**:
+
+```javascript
+function presentSummary(aggregatedAnalysis) {
+  const { mode, pattern } = aggregatedAnalysis
+
+  console.log(`
+## Analysis Result Summary
+
+**Mode**: ${mode} (${pattern})
+**Tools**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.tools_used.join(' → ')}
+`)
+
+  switch (mode) {
+    case 'parallel':
+      console.log(`
+### Consensus Points
+${aggregatedAnalysis.consensus.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}
+
+### Divergence Points
+${aggregatedAnalysis.divergences.map(d => `- ${d}`).join('\n')}
+`)
+      break
+
+    case 'sequential':
+      console.log(`
+### Analysis Evolution
+${aggregatedAnalysis.evolution.map(e => `**Step ${e.step}**: ${e.analysis.summary}`).join('\n')}
+
+### Final Analysis
+${aggregatedAnalysis.finalAnalysis.summary}
+`)
+      break
+
+    case 'collaborative':
+      console.log(`
+### Collaboration Rounds
+${Object.entries(aggregatedAnalysis.rounds).map(([round, analyses]) =>
+  `**Round ${round}**: ${analyses.map(a => a.cli).join(' + ')}`
+).join('\n')}
+
+### Synthesized Result
+${aggregatedAnalysis.synthesis}
+`)
+      break
+
+    case 'debate':
+      console.log(`
+### Debate Summary
+**Proposal**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.proposal.summary}
+**Challenges**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.challenges.points?.length || 0} points raised
+**Resolution**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.resolution.summary}
+**Confidence**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.confidence}%
+`)
+      break
+
+    case 'challenge':
+      console.log(`
+### Challenge Summary
+**Original Analysis**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.originalAnalysis.summary}
+**Critiques Found**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.critiques.length} issues
+${aggregatedAnalysis.critiques.map(c => `- [${c.severity}] ${c.description}`).join('\n')}
+**Risk Score**: ${aggregatedAnalysis.riskScore}/100
+`)
+      break
+  }
+}
+
+presentSummary(aggregatedAnalysis)
+```
+
+**Decision Options**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "How to proceed?",
+    header: "Next Step",
+    options: [
+      { label: "Execute directly", description: "Implement immediately based on analysis" },
+      { label: "Refine analysis", description: "Provide more constraints, re-analyze" },
+      { label: "Change tools", description: "Select different tool combination" },
+      { label: "Cancel", description: "End current workflow" }
+    ],
+    multiSelect: false
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Routing Logic**:
+- **Execute directly** → Phase 5
+- **Refine analysis** → Collect feedback, return to Phase 3
+- **Change tools** → Return to Phase 2
+- **Cancel** → End workflow
+
+### Phase 5: Direct Execution
+
+**No Artifacts - Direct Implementation**:
+```javascript
+// Use the aggregated analysis directly
+// No IMPL_PLAN.md, no plan.json, no session files
+
+console.log("Starting direct execution based on analysis...")
+
+// Execution-capable agents (canExecute: true)
+const executionAgents = agents.filter(a => a.canExecute)
+
+// Select execution tool: prefer execution-capable agent, fallback to CLI
+const executionTool = selectedTools.find(t =>
+  t.type === 'agent' && executionAgents.some(ea => ea.name === t.name)
+) || selectedTools.find(t => t.type === 'cli')
+
+if (executionTool.type === 'agent') {
+  // Use Agent for execution (preferred if available)
+  Task({
+    subagent_type: executionTool.name,
+    run_in_background: false,
+    description: `Execute: ${taskDescription.slice(0, 30)}`,
+    prompt: `
+## Task
+${taskDescription}
+
+## Analysis Results (from previous tools)
+${JSON.stringify(aggregatedAnalysis, null, 2)}
+
+## Instructions
+Based on the analysis above, implement the solution:
+1. Apply changes to identified files
+2. Follow the recommended approach
+3. Handle identified risks
+4. Verify changes work correctly
+`
+  })
+} else {
+  // Use CLI with write mode
+  Bash({
+    command: `ccw cli -p "
+PURPOSE: Implement the solution based on analysis: ${taskDescription}
+TASK: ${extractedTasks.join(' • ')}
+MODE: write
+CONTEXT: @${affectedFiles.join(' @')}
+EXPECTED: Working implementation with all changes applied
+RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md) | Apply analysis findings directly
+" --tool ${executionTool.name} --mode write`,
+    run_in_background: false
+  })
+}
+```
+
+## TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({ todos: [
+  { content: "Phase 1: Clarify requirements", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Clarifying requirements" },
+  { content: "Phase 2: Auto-select tools", status: "pending", activeForm: "Analyzing task" },
+  { content: "Phase 3: Mixed tool analysis", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running analysis" },
+  { content: "Phase 4: User decision", status: "pending", activeForm: "Awaiting decision" },
+  { content: "Phase 5: Direct execution", status: "pending", activeForm: "Executing implementation" }
+]})
+```
+
+## Iteration Patterns
+
+### Pattern A: Direct Path (Most Common)
+```
+Phase 1 → Phase 2 (auto) → Phase 3 → Phase 4 (execute) → Phase 5
+```
+
+### Pattern B: Refinement Loop
+```
+Phase 3 → Phase 4 (refine) → Phase 3 → Phase 4 → Phase 5
+```
+
+### Pattern C: Tool Adjustment
+```
+Phase 2 (adjust) → Phase 3 → Phase 4 → Phase 5
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| CLI timeout | Retry with secondary model |
+| No enabled tools | Load cli-tools.json, ask user to enable tools |
+| Task type unclear | Default to first available CLI + code-developer |
+| Ambiguous task | Force clarification via AskUser |
+| Execution fails | Present error, ask user for direction |
+
+## Analysis Modes Reference
+
+| Mode | Pattern | Use Case | CLI Count |
+|------|---------|----------|-----------|
+| **Parallel** | `A \|\| B \|\| C → Aggregate` | Fast multi-perspective analysis | 1+ |
+| **Sequential** | `A → B(resume) → C(resume)` | Deep incremental analysis | 2+ |
+| **Collaborative** | `A → B → A → B → Synthesize` | Multi-round refinement | 2+ |
+| **Debate** | `A(propose) → B(challenge) → A(defend)` | Stress-test solutions | 2 |
+| **Challenge** | `A(analyze) → B(challenge)` | Find flaws and risks | 2 |
+
+## Comparison
+
+| Aspect | lite-lite-lite | multi-cli-plan |
+|--------|----------------|----------------|
+| **Artifacts** | None | IMPL_PLAN.md, plan.json, synthesis.json |
+| **Session** | Stateless (uses --resume for chaining) | Persistent session folder |
+| **Tool Selection** | Multi-CLI + Agent via 3-step selection | Config-driven with fixed tools |
+| **Analysis Modes** | 5 modes (parallel/sequential/collaborative/debate/challenge) | Fixed synthesis rounds |
+| **CLI Collaboration** | Auto --resume chaining | Manual session management |
+| **Iteration** | Via AskUser | Via rounds/synthesis |
+| **Execution** | Direct | Via lite-execute |
+| **Best For** | Quick analysis, adversarial validation, rapid iteration | Complex multi-step implementations |
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Be Specific**: Clear task description improves auto-selection accuracy
+2. **Trust Auto-Selection**: Algorithm matches task type to tool strengths
+3. **Adjust When Needed**: Use "Adjust tools" if auto-selection doesn't fit
+4. **Trust Consensus**: When tools agree, confidence is high
+5. **Iterate Fast**: Use refinement loop for complex requirements
+6. **Direct is Fast**: Skip artifacts when task is straightforward
+
+## Related Commands
+
+```bash
+# Full planning workflow
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "complex task"
+
+# Single CLI planning
+/workflow:lite-plan "task"
+
+# Direct execution
+/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/multi-cli-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,510 @@
+---
+name: workflow:multi-cli-plan
+description: Multi-CLI collaborative planning workflow with ACE context gathering and iterative cross-verification. Uses cli-discuss-agent for Gemini+Codex+Claude analysis to converge on optimal execution plan.
+argument-hint: "<task description> [--max-rounds=3] [--tools=gemini,codex] [--mode=parallel|serial]"
+allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Write(*), mcp__ace-tool__search_context(*)
+---
+
+# Multi-CLI Collaborative Planning Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Basic usage
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Implement user authentication"
+
+# With options
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Add dark mode support" --max-rounds=3
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Refactor payment module" --tools=gemini,codex,claude
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Fix memory leak" --mode=serial
+
+# Resume session
+/workflow:lite-execute --session=MCP-xxx
+```
+
+**Context Source**: ACE semantic search + Multi-CLI analysis
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/`
+**Default Max Rounds**: 3 (convergence may complete earlier)
+**CLI Tools**: @cli-discuss-agent (analysis), @cli-lite-planning-agent (plan generation)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+
+Multi-CLI collaborative planning with **three-phase architecture**: ACE context gathering → Iterative multi-CLI discussion → Plan generation. Orchestrator delegates analysis to agents, only handles user decisions and session management.
+
+**Process**:
+- **Phase 1**: ACE semantic search gathers codebase context
+- **Phase 2**: cli-discuss-agent orchestrates Gemini/Codex/Claude for cross-verified analysis
+- **Phase 3-5**: User decision → Plan generation → Execution handoff
+
+**vs Single-CLI Planning**:
+- **Single**: One model perspective, potential blind spots
+- **Multi-CLI**: Cross-verification catches inconsistencies, builds consensus on solutions
+
+### Value Proposition
+
+1. **Multi-Perspective Analysis**: Gemini + Codex + Claude analyze from different angles
+2. **Cross-Verification**: Identify agreements/disagreements, build confidence
+3. **User-Driven Decisions**: Every round ends with user decision point
+4. **Iterative Convergence**: Progressive refinement until consensus reached
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+
+- **ONLY command** for multi-CLI collaborative planning
+- Manages: Session state, user decisions, agent delegation, phase transitions
+- Delegates: CLI execution to @cli-discuss-agent, plan generation to @cli-lite-planning-agent
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Context Gathering
+   └─ ACE semantic search, extract keywords, build context package
+
+Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion (Iterative, via @cli-discuss-agent)
+   ├─ Round N: Agent executes Gemini + Codex + Claude
+   ├─ Cross-verify findings, synthesize solutions
+   ├─ Write synthesis.json to rounds/{N}/
+   └─ Loop until convergence or max rounds
+
+Phase 3: Present Options
+   └─ Display solutions with trade-offs from agent output
+
+Phase 4: User Decision
+   ├─ Approve solution → Phase 5
+   ├─ Need clarification → Return to Phase 2
+   └─ Change direction → Reset with feedback
+
+Phase 5: Plan Generation (via @cli-lite-planning-agent)
+   ├─ Generate IMPL_PLAN.md + plan.json
+   └─ Hand off to /workflow:lite-execute
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Session management, ACE context, user decisions, phase transitions |
+| **@cli-discuss-agent** | Multi-CLI execution (Gemini/Codex/Claude), cross-verification, solution synthesis, synthesis.json output |
+| **@cli-lite-planning-agent** | Task decomposition, IMPL_PLAN.md + plan.json generation |
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Phase 1: Context Gathering
+
+**Session Initialization**:
+```javascript
+const sessionId = `MCP-${taskSlug}-${date}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/${sessionId}`
+Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/rounds`)
+```
+
+**ACE Context Queries**:
+```javascript
+const aceQueries = [
+  `Project architecture related to ${keywords}`,
+  `Existing implementations of ${keywords[0]}`,
+  `Code patterns for ${keywords} features`,
+  `Integration points for ${keywords[0]}`
+]
+// Execute via mcp__ace-tool__search_context
+```
+
+**Context Package** (passed to agent):
+- `relevant_files[]` - Files identified by ACE
+- `detected_patterns[]` - Code patterns found
+- `architecture_insights` - Structure understanding
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Delegation
+
+**Core Principle**: Orchestrator only delegates and reads output - NO direct CLI execution.
+
+**Agent Invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-discuss-agent",
+  run_in_background: false,
+  description: `Discussion round ${currentRound}`,
+  prompt: `
+## Input Context
+- task_description: ${taskDescription}
+- round_number: ${currentRound}
+- session: { id: "${sessionId}", folder: "${sessionFolder}" }
+- ace_context: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackageage)}
+- previous_rounds: ${JSON.stringify(analysisResults)}
+- user_feedback: ${userFeedback || 'None'}
+- cli_config: { tools: ["gemini", "codex"], mode: "parallel", fallback_chain: ["gemini", "codex", "claude"] }
+
+## Execution Process
+1. Parse input context (handle JSON strings)
+2. Check if ACE supplementary search needed
+3. Build CLI prompts with context
+4. Execute CLIs (parallel or serial per cli_config.mode)
+5. Parse CLI outputs, handle failures with fallback
+6. Perform cross-verification between CLI results
+7. Synthesize solutions, calculate scores
+8. Calculate convergence, generate clarification questions
+9. Write synthesis.json
+
+## Output
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/rounds/${currentRound}/synthesis.json
+
+## Completion Checklist
+- [ ] All configured CLI tools executed (or fallback triggered)
+- [ ] Cross-verification completed with agreements/disagreements
+- [ ] 2-3 solutions generated with file:line references
+- [ ] Convergence score calculated (0.0-1.0)
+- [ ] synthesis.json written with all Primary Fields
+`
+})
+```
+
+**Read Agent Output**:
+```javascript
+const synthesis = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/rounds/${round}/synthesis.json`))
+// Access top-level fields: solutions, convergence, cross_verification, clarification_questions
+```
+
+**Convergence Decision**:
+```javascript
+if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'converged') {
+  // Proceed to Phase 3
+} else if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'user_input_needed') {
+  // Collect user feedback, return to Phase 2
+} else {
+  // Continue to next round if new_insights && round < maxRounds
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Present Options
+
+**Display from Agent Output** (no processing):
+```javascript
+console.log(`
+## Solution Options
+
+${synthesis.solutions.map((s, i) => `
+**Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}**
+Source: ${s.source_cli.join(' + ')}
+Effort: ${s.effort} | Risk: ${s.risk}
+
+Pros: ${s.pros.join(', ')}
+Cons: ${s.cons.join(', ')}
+
+Files: ${s.affected_files.slice(0,3).map(f => `${f.file}:${f.line}`).join(', ')}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+## Cross-Verification
+Agreements: ${synthesis.cross_verification.agreements.length}
+Disagreements: ${synthesis.cross_verification.disagreements.length}
+`)
+```
+
+### Phase 4: User Decision
+
+**Decision Options**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [{
+    question: "Which solution approach?",
+    header: "Solution",
+    options: solutions.map((s, i) => ({
+      label: `Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}`,
+      description: `${s.effort} effort, ${s.risk} risk`
+    })).concat([
+      { label: "Need More Analysis", description: "Return to Phase 2" }
+    ])
+  }]
+})
+```
+
+**Routing**:
+- Approve → Phase 5
+- Need More Analysis → Phase 2 with feedback
+- Add constraints → Collect details, then Phase 5
+
+### Phase 5: Plan Generation
+
+**Step 1: Build Context-Package** (Orchestrator responsibility):
+```javascript
+// Extract key information from user decision and synthesis
+const contextPackage = {
+  // Core solution details
+  solution: {
+    name: selectedSolution.name,
+    source_cli: selectedSolution.source_cli,
+    feasibility: selectedSolution.feasibility,
+    effort: selectedSolution.effort,
+    risk: selectedSolution.risk,
+    summary: selectedSolution.summary
+  },
+  // Implementation plan (tasks, flow, milestones)
+  implementation_plan: selectedSolution.implementation_plan,
+  // Dependencies
+  dependencies: selectedSolution.dependencies || { internal: [], external: [] },
+  // Technical concerns
+  technical_concerns: selectedSolution.technical_concerns || [],
+  // Consensus from cross-verification
+  consensus: {
+    agreements: synthesis.cross_verification.agreements,
+    resolved_conflicts: synthesis.cross_verification.resolution
+  },
+  // User constraints (from Phase 4 feedback)
+  constraints: userConstraints || [],
+  // Task context
+  task_description: taskDescription,
+  session_id: sessionId
+}
+
+// Write context-package for traceability
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/context-package.json`, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2))
+```
+
+**Context-Package Schema**:
+
+| Field | Type | Description |
+|-------|------|-------------|
+| `solution` | object | User-selected solution from synthesis |
+| `solution.name` | string | Solution identifier |
+| `solution.feasibility` | number | Viability score (0-1) |
+| `solution.summary` | string | Brief analysis summary |
+| `implementation_plan` | object | Task breakdown with flow and dependencies |
+| `implementation_plan.approach` | string | High-level technical strategy |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[]` | array | Discrete tasks with id, name, depends_on, files |
+| `implementation_plan.execution_flow` | string | Task sequence (e.g., "T1 → T2 → T3") |
+| `implementation_plan.milestones` | string[] | Key checkpoints |
+| `dependencies` | object | Module and package dependencies |
+| `technical_concerns` | string[] | Risks and blockers |
+| `consensus` | object | Cross-verified agreements from multi-CLI |
+| `constraints` | string[] | User-specified constraints from Phase 4 |
+
+```json
+{
+  "solution": {
+    "name": "Strategy Pattern Refactoring",
+    "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"],
+    "feasibility": 0.88,
+    "effort": "medium",
+    "risk": "low",
+    "summary": "Extract payment gateway interface, implement strategy pattern for multi-gateway support"
+  },
+  "implementation_plan": {
+    "approach": "Define interface → Create concrete strategies → Implement factory → Migrate existing code",
+    "tasks": [
+      {"id": "T1", "name": "Define PaymentGateway interface", "depends_on": [], "files": [{"file": "src/types/payment.ts", "line": 1, "action": "create"}], "key_point": "Include all existing Stripe methods"},
+      {"id": "T2", "name": "Implement StripeGateway", "depends_on": ["T1"], "files": [{"file": "src/payment/stripe.ts", "line": 1, "action": "create"}], "key_point": "Wrap existing logic"},
+      {"id": "T3", "name": "Create GatewayFactory", "depends_on": ["T1"], "files": [{"file": "src/payment/factory.ts", "line": 1, "action": "create"}], "key_point": null},
+      {"id": "T4", "name": "Migrate processor to use factory", "depends_on": ["T2", "T3"], "files": [{"file": "src/payment/processor.ts", "line": 45, "action": "modify"}], "key_point": "Backward compatible"}
+    ],
+    "execution_flow": "T1 → (T2 | T3) → T4",
+    "milestones": ["Interface defined", "Gateway implementations complete", "Migration done"]
+  },
+  "dependencies": {
+    "internal": ["@/lib/payment-gateway", "@/types/payment"],
+    "external": ["stripe@^14.0.0"]
+  },
+  "technical_concerns": ["Existing tests must pass", "No breaking API changes"],
+  "consensus": {
+    "agreements": ["Use strategy pattern", "Keep existing API"],
+    "resolved_conflicts": "Factory over DI for simpler integration"
+  },
+  "constraints": ["backward compatible", "no breaking changes to PaymentResult type"],
+  "task_description": "Refactor payment processing for multi-gateway support",
+  "session_id": "MCP-payment-refactor-2026-01-14"
+}
+```
+
+**Step 2: Invoke Planning Agent**:
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-lite-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background: false,
+  description: "Generate implementation plan",
+  prompt: `
+## Schema Reference
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json
+
+## Context-Package (from orchestrator)
+${JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)}
+
+## Execution Process
+1. Read plan-json-schema.json for output structure
+2. Read project-tech.json and project-guidelines.json
+3. Parse context-package fields:
+   - solution: name, feasibility, summary
+   - implementation_plan: tasks[], execution_flow, milestones
+   - dependencies: internal[], external[]
+   - technical_concerns: risks/blockers
+   - consensus: agreements, resolved_conflicts
+   - constraints: user requirements
+4. Use implementation_plan.tasks[] as task foundation
+5. Preserve task dependencies (depends_on) and execution_flow
+6. Expand tasks with detailed acceptance criteria
+7. Generate IMPL_PLAN.md documenting milestones and key_points
+8. Generate plan.json following schema exactly
+
+## Output
+- ${sessionFolder}/IMPL_PLAN.md
+- ${sessionFolder}/plan.json
+
+## Completion Checklist
+- [ ] IMPL_PLAN.md documents approach, milestones, technical_concerns
+- [ ] plan.json preserves task dependencies from implementation_plan
+- [ ] Task execution order follows execution_flow
+- [ ] Key_points reflected in task descriptions
+- [ ] User constraints applied to implementation
+- [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable
+`
+})
+```
+
+**Hand off to Execution**:
+```javascript
+if (userConfirms) {
+  SlashCommand("/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory")
+}
+```
+
+## Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{MCP-task-slug-YYYY-MM-DD}/
+├── session-state.json          # Session tracking (orchestrator)
+├── rounds/
+│   ├── 1/synthesis.json        # Round 1 analysis (cli-discuss-agent)
+│   ├── 2/synthesis.json        # Round 2 analysis (cli-discuss-agent)
+│   └── .../
+├── context-package.json        # Extracted context for planning (orchestrator)
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                # Documentation (cli-lite-planning-agent)
+└── plan.json                   # Structured plan (cli-lite-planning-agent)
+```
+
+**File Producers**:
+
+| File | Producer | Content |
+|------|----------|---------|
+| `session-state.json` | Orchestrator | Session metadata, rounds, decisions |
+| `rounds/*/synthesis.json` | cli-discuss-agent | Solutions, convergence, cross-verification |
+| `context-package.json` | Orchestrator | Extracted solution, dependencies, consensus for planning |
+| `IMPL_PLAN.md` | cli-lite-planning-agent | Human-readable plan |
+| `plan.json` | cli-lite-planning-agent | Structured tasks for execution |
+
+## synthesis.json Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "round": 1,
+  "solutions": [{
+    "name": "Solution Name",
+    "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"],
+    "feasibility": 0.85,
+    "effort": "low|medium|high",
+    "risk": "low|medium|high",
+    "summary": "Brief analysis summary",
+    "implementation_plan": {
+      "approach": "High-level technical approach",
+      "tasks": [
+        {"id": "T1", "name": "Task", "depends_on": [], "files": [], "key_point": "..."}
+      ],
+      "execution_flow": "T1 → T2 → T3",
+      "milestones": ["Checkpoint 1", "Checkpoint 2"]
+    },
+    "dependencies": {"internal": [], "external": []},
+    "technical_concerns": ["Risk 1", "Blocker 2"]
+  }],
+  "convergence": {
+    "score": 0.85,
+    "new_insights": false,
+    "recommendation": "converged|continue|user_input_needed"
+  },
+  "cross_verification": {
+    "agreements": [],
+    "disagreements": [],
+    "resolution": "..."
+  },
+  "clarification_questions": []
+}
+```
+
+**Key Planning Fields**:
+
+| Field | Purpose |
+|-------|---------|
+| `feasibility` | Viability score (0-1) |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[]` | Discrete tasks with dependencies |
+| `implementation_plan.execution_flow` | Task sequence visualization |
+| `implementation_plan.milestones` | Key checkpoints |
+| `technical_concerns` | Risks and blockers |
+
+**Note**: Solutions ranked by internal scoring (array order = priority)
+
+## TodoWrite Structure
+
+**Initialization**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({ todos: [
+  { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Gathering context" },
+  { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running discussion" },
+  { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "pending", activeForm: "Presenting options" },
+  { content: "Phase 4: User Decision", status: "pending", activeForm: "Awaiting decision" },
+  { content: "Phase 5: Plan Generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating plan" }
+]})
+```
+
+**During Discussion Rounds**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({ todos: [
+  { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "completed", activeForm: "Gathering context" },
+  { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Running discussion" },
+  { content: "  → Round 1: Initial analysis", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing" },
+  { content: "  → Round 2: Deep verification", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Verifying" },
+  { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "pending", activeForm: "Presenting options" },
+  // ...
+]})
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| ACE search fails | Fall back to Glob/Grep for file discovery |
+| Agent fails | Retry once, then present partial results |
+| CLI timeout (in agent) | Agent uses fallback: gemini → codex → claude |
+| No convergence | Present best options, flag uncertainty |
+| synthesis.json parse error | Request agent retry |
+| User cancels | Save session for later resumption |
+
+## Configuration
+
+| Flag | Default | Description |
+|------|---------|-------------|
+| `--max-rounds` | 3 | Maximum discussion rounds |
+| `--tools` | gemini,codex | CLI tools for analysis |
+| `--mode` | parallel | Execution mode: parallel or serial |
+| `--auto-execute` | false | Auto-execute after approval |
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Be Specific**: Detailed task descriptions improve ACE context quality
+2. **Provide Feedback**: Use clarification rounds to refine requirements
+3. **Trust Cross-Verification**: Multi-CLI consensus indicates high confidence
+4. **Review Trade-offs**: Consider pros/cons before selecting solution
+5. **Check synthesis.json**: Review agent output for detailed analysis
+6. **Iterate When Needed**: Don't hesitate to request more analysis
+
+## Related Commands
+
+```bash
+# Resume saved session
+/workflow:lite-execute --session=MCP-xxx
+
+# Simpler single-round planning
+/workflow:lite-plan "task description"
+
+# Issue-driven discovery
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "find issues"
+
+# View session files
+cat .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
+cat .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/rounds/1/synthesis.json
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/plan.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: plan
-description: 5-phase planning workflow with action-planning-agent task generation, outputs IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs with optional CLI auto-execution
-argument-hint: "[--cli-execute] \"text description\"|file.md"
+description: 5-phase planning workflow with action-planning-agent task generation, outputs IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs
+argument-hint: "\"text description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 3 (conflict reso
 5. **Phase 4 executes** → Task generation (task-generate-agent) → Reports final summary
 
 **Task Attachment Model**:
-- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
-- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- SlashCommand execute **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is executed (e.g., `/workflow:tools:context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
 - Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
 - After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
 - This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
@@ -43,13 +43,48 @@ This workflow runs **fully autonomously** once triggered. Phase 3 (conflict reso
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each command/agent output for next phase
 4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
 5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
-6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+6. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
 7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
+
+Phase 1: Session Discovery
+   └─ /workflow:session:start --auto "structured-description"
+      └─ Output: sessionId (WFS-xxx)
+
+Phase 2: Context Gathering
+   └─ /workflow:tools:context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
+      ├─ Tasks attached: Analyze structure → Identify integration → Generate package
+      └─ Output: contextPath + conflict_risk
+
+Phase 3: Conflict Resolution 
+   └─ Decision (conflict_risk check):
+      ├─ conflict_risk ≥ medium → Execute /workflow:tools:conflict-resolution
+      │   ├─ Tasks attached: Detect conflicts → Present to user → Apply strategies
+      │   └─ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts
+      └─ conflict_risk < medium → Skip to Phase 4
+
+Phase 4: Task Generation
+   └─ /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session sessionId
+      └─ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
+
+Return:
+   └─ Summary with recommended next steps
+```
+
 ## 5-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
+
+**Step 1.1: Execute** - Create or discover workflow session
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"[structured-task-description]\"")
+```
 
 **Task Description Structure**:
 ```
@@ -81,7 +116,12 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 ---
 
 ### Phase 2: Context Gathering
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"[structured-task-description]\"")`
+
+**Step 2.1: Execute** - Gather project context and analyze codebase
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"[structured-task-description]\"")
+```
 
 **Use Same Structured Description**: Pass the same structured format from Phase 1
 
@@ -95,29 +135,30 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 - Context package path extracted
 - File exists and is valid JSON
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When context-gather invoked, INSERT 3 context-gather tasks, mark first as in_progress -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: When context-gather executed, INSERT 3 context-gather tasks, mark first as in_progress -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2.1: Analyze codebase structure (context-gather)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing codebase structure"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2.2: Identify integration points (context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying integration points"},
-  {"content": "Phase 2.3: Generate context package (context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context package"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "  → Analyze codebase structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing codebase structure"},
+  {"content": "  → Identify integration points", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying integration points"},
+  {"content": "  → Generate context package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context package"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
 
 <!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 2 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 2.1-2.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
 
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -127,11 +168,15 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 ---
 
-### Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (Optional - auto-triggered by conflict risk)
+### Phase 3: Conflict Resolution
 
 **Trigger**: Only execute when context-package.json indicates conflict_risk is "medium" or "high"
 
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+**Step 3.1: Execute** - Detect and resolve conflicts with CLI analysis
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - sessionId from Phase 1
@@ -140,10 +185,10 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **Parse Output**:
 - Extract: Execution status (success/skipped/failed)
-- Verify: CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file path (if executed)
+- Verify: conflict-resolution.json file path (if executed)
 
 **Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md` exists (if executed)
+- File `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/conflict-resolution.json` exists (if executed)
 
 **Skip Behavior**:
 - If conflict_risk is "none" or "low", skip directly to Phase 3.5
@@ -151,29 +196,30 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 <!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Detect conflicts with CLI analysis (conflict-resolution)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Present conflicts to user (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Apply resolution strategies (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Conflict Resolution", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Present conflicts to user", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Apply resolution strategies", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks sequentially.
 
 <!-- TodoWrite: After Phase 3 tasks complete, REMOVE Phase 3.1-3.3, restore to orchestrator view -->
 
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Resolve conflicts and apply fixes", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
-  {"content": "Execute task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Conflict Resolution", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Resolving conflicts"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -183,9 +229,14 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 
 **Memory State Check**:
 - Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
-- If memory usage is high (>110K tokens or approaching context limits):
-  - **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/compact")`
-  - This optimizes memory before proceeding to Phase 3.5
+- If memory usage is high (>120K tokens or approaching context limits):
+
+  **Step 3.2: Execute** - Optimize memory before proceeding
+
+  ```javascript
+  SlashCommand(command="/compact")
+  ```
+
 - Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
 - Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
 
@@ -219,17 +270,13 @@ CONTEXT: Existing user database schema, REST API endpoints
 - Task generation translates high-level role analyses into concrete, actionable work items
 - **Intent priority**: Current user prompt > role analysis.md files > guidance-specification.md
 
-**Command**:
-```bash
-# Default (agent mode)
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")
+**Step 4.1: Execute** - Generate implementation plan and task JSONs
 
-# With CLI execution
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId] --cli-execute")
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]")
 ```
 
-**Flag**:
-- `--cli-execute`: Generate tasks with Codex execution commands
+**CLI Execution Note**: CLI tool usage is now determined semantically by action-planning-agent based on user's task description. If user specifies "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen for X", the agent embeds `command` fields in relevant `implementation_approach` steps.
 
 **Input**: `sessionId` from Phase 1
 
@@ -238,14 +285,14 @@ SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]
 - `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
 - `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-agent invoked, ATTACH 1 agent task -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-agent executed, ATTACH 1 agent task -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand invoked - agent task attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand executed - agent task attached)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute task-generate-agent", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing task-generate-agent"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -256,9 +303,9 @@ SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute task-generate-agent", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing task-generate-agent"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -284,7 +331,7 @@ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues earl
 
 ### Key Principles
 
-1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand executed):
    - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
    - **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks attached (e.g., Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
    - **Phase 4**: Single agent task attached (e.g., "Execute task-generate-agent")
@@ -303,14 +350,9 @@ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to catch issues earl
    - No user intervention required between phases
    - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
 
-**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary for Phase 2/3, or marked completed for Phase 4) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase executed (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary for Phase 2/3, or marked completed for Phase 4) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
 
-### Benefits
 
-- ✓ Real-time visibility into sub-task execution
-- ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach → execute → collapse (Phase 2/3) or complete (Phase 4)
-- ✓ Clean summary after completion
-- ✓ Easy to track workflow progress
 
 **Note**: See individual Phase descriptions for detailed TodoWrite Update examples:
 - **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks with attach/collapse pattern
@@ -376,7 +418,7 @@ Phase 3: conflict-resolution [AUTO-TRIGGERED if conflict_risk ≥ medium]
     ↓ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts (NO report file)
     ↓ Skip if conflict_risk is none/low → proceed directly to Phase 4
     ↓
-Phase 4: task-generate-agent --session sessionId [--cli-execute]
+Phase 4: task-generate-agent --session sessionId
     ↓ Input: sessionId + resolved brainstorm artifacts + session memory
     ↓ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
     ↓
@@ -389,11 +431,6 @@ Return summary to user
 - Brainstorming artifacts (potentially modified by Phase 3)
 - Session-specific configuration
 
-**Structured Description Benefits**:
-- **Clarity**: Clear separation of goal, scope, and context
-- **Consistency**: Same format across all phases
-- **Traceability**: Easy to track what was requested
-- **Precision**: Better context gathering and analysis
 
 ## Execution Flow Diagram
 
@@ -405,30 +442,29 @@ User triggers: /workflow:plan "Build authentication system"
 Phase 1: Session Discovery
   → sessionId extracted
   ↓
-Phase 2: Context Gathering (SlashCommand invoked)
-  → ATTACH 3 tasks: ← ATTACHED
-    - Phase 2.1: Analyze codebase structure
-    - Phase 2.2: Identify integration points
-    - Phase 2.3: Generate context package
-  → Execute Phase 2.1-2.3
+Phase 2: Context Gathering (SlashCommand executed)
+  → ATTACH 3 sub-tasks: ← ATTACHED
+    - → Analyze codebase structure
+    - → Identify integration points
+    - → Generate context package
+  → Execute sub-tasks sequentially
   → COLLAPSE tasks ← COLLAPSED
   → contextPath + conflict_risk extracted
   ↓
 Conditional Branch: Check conflict_risk
   ├─ IF conflict_risk ≥ medium:
-  │   Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (SlashCommand invoked)
-  │     → ATTACH 3 tasks: ← ATTACHED
-  │       - Phase 3.1: Detect conflicts with CLI analysis
-  │       - Phase 3.2: Present conflicts to user
-  │       - Phase 3.3: Apply resolution strategies
-  │     → Execute Phase 3.1-3.3
+  │   Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (SlashCommand executed)
+  │     → ATTACH 3 sub-tasks: ← ATTACHED
+  │       - → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis
+  │       - → Present conflicts to user
+  │       - → Apply resolution strategies
+  │     → Execute sub-tasks sequentially
   │     → COLLAPSE tasks ← COLLAPSED
   │
   └─ ELSE: Skip Phase 3, proceed to Phase 4
   ↓
-Phase 4: Task Generation (SlashCommand invoked)
-  → ATTACH 1 agent task: ← ATTACHED
-    - Execute task-generate-agent
+Phase 4: Task Generation (SlashCommand executed)
+  → Single agent task (no sub-tasks)
   → Agent autonomously completes internally:
     (discovery → planning → output)
   → Outputs: IMPL_PLAN.md, IMPL-*.json, TODO_LIST.md
@@ -437,7 +473,7 @@ Return summary to user
 ```
 
 **Key Points**:
-- **← ATTACHED**: Tasks attached to TodoWrite when SlashCommand invoked
+- **← ATTACHED**: Tasks attached to TodoWrite when SlashCommand executed
   - Phase 2, 3: Multiple sub-tasks
   - Phase 4: Single agent task
 - **← COLLAPSED**: Sub-tasks collapsed to summary after completion (Phase 2, 3 only)
@@ -461,11 +497,9 @@ Return summary to user
 - Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
 - **Extract conflict_risk from context-package.json**: Determine Phase 3 execution
 - **If conflict_risk ≥ medium**: Launch Phase 3 conflict-resolution with sessionId and contextPath
-- Wait for Phase 3 to finish executing (if executed), verify CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md created
+- Wait for Phase 3 to finish executing (if executed), verify conflict-resolution.json created
 - **If conflict_risk is none/low**: Skip Phase 3, proceed directly to Phase 4
-- **Build Phase 4 command**:
-  - Base command: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]`
-  - Add `--cli-execute` if flag present
+- **Build Phase 4 command**: `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session [sessionId]`
 - Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
 - Verify all Phase 4 outputs
 - Update TodoWrite after each phase (dynamically adjust for Phase 3 presence)

.claude/commands/workflow/replan.md

@@ -48,8 +48,54 @@ Intelligently replans workflow sessions or individual tasks with interactive bou
 /workflow:replan IMPL-1 --interactive
 ```
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session, --interactive
+   └─ Detect mode: task-id present → Task mode | Otherwise → Session mode
+
+Phase 1: Mode Detection & Session Discovery
+   ├─ Detect operation mode (Task vs Session)
+   ├─ Discover/validate session (--session flag or auto-detect)
+   └─ Load session context (workflow-session.json, IMPL_PLAN.md, TODO_LIST.md)
+
+Phase 2: Interactive Requirement Clarification
+   └─ Decision (by mode):
+      ├─ Session mode → 3-4 questions (scope, modules, changes, dependencies)
+      └─ Task mode → 2 questions (update type, ripple effect)
+
+Phase 3: Impact Analysis & Planning
+   ├─ Analyze required changes
+   ├─ Generate modification plan
+   └─ User confirmation (Execute / Adjust / Cancel)
+
+Phase 4: Backup Creation
+   └─ Backup all affected files with manifest
+
+Phase 5: Apply Modifications
+   ├─ Update IMPL_PLAN.md (if needed)
+   ├─ Update TODO_LIST.md (if needed)
+   ├─ Update/Create/Delete task JSONs
+   └─ Update session metadata
+
+Phase 6: Verification & Summary
+   ├─ Validate consistency (JSON validity, task limits, acyclic dependencies)
+   └─ Generate change summary
+```
+
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
+### Input Parsing
+
+**Parse flags**:
+```javascript
+const sessionFlag = $ARGUMENTS.match(/--session\s+(\S+)/)?.[1]
+const interactive = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--interactive')
+const taskIdMatch = $ARGUMENTS.match(/\b(IMPL-\d+(?:\.\d+)?)\b/)
+const taskId = taskIdMatch?.[1]
+```
+
 ### Phase 1: Mode Detection & Session Discovery
 
 **Process**:
@@ -97,11 +143,10 @@ Options: Dynamically generated from existing tasks' focus_paths
 **Q3: Task Changes** (if scope >= task_restructure)
 ```javascript
 Options:
-- 添加新任务
-- 删除现有任务
-- 合并任务
-- 拆分任务
-- 仅更新内容
+- 添加/删除任务 (add_remove)
+- 合并/拆分任务 (merge_split)
+- 仅更新内容 (update_only)
+// Note: Max 4 options for AskUserQuestion
 ```
 
 **Q4: Dependency Changes**

.claude/commands/workflow/review-fix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,606 @@
+---
+name: review-fix
+description: Automated fixing of code review findings with AI-powered planning and coordinated execution. Uses intelligent grouping, multi-stage timeline coordination, and test-driven verification.
+argument-hint: "<export-file|review-dir> [--resume] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*), Edit(*), Write(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Fix Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Fix from exported findings file (session-based path)
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/fix-export-1706184622000.json
+
+# Fix from review directory (auto-discovers latest export)
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/
+
+# Resume interrupted fix session
+/workflow:review-fix --resume
+
+# Custom max retry attempts per finding
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-123/.review/ --max-iterations=5
+```
+
+**Fix Source**: Exported findings from review cycle dashboard
+**Output Directory**: `{review-dir}/fixes/{fix-session-id}/` (within session .review/)
+**Default Max Iterations**: 3 (per finding, adjustable)
+**CLI Tools**: @cli-planning-agent (planning), @cli-execute-agent (fixing)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Automated fix orchestrator with **two-phase architecture**: AI-powered planning followed by coordinated parallel/serial execution. Generates fix timeline with intelligent grouping and dependency analysis, then executes fixes with conservative test verification.
+
+**Fix Process**:
+- **Planning Phase**: AI analyzes findings, generates fix plan with grouping and execution strategy
+- **Execution Phase**: Main orchestrator coordinates agents per timeline stages
+- **No rigid structure**: Adapts to task requirements, not bound to fixed JSON format
+
+**vs Manual Fixing**:
+- **Manual**: Developer reviews findings one-by-one, fixes sequentially
+- **Automated**: AI groups related issues, executes in optimal parallel/serial order with automatic test verification
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Intelligent Planning**: AI-powered analysis identifies optimal grouping and execution strategy
+2. **Multi-stage Coordination**: Supports complex parallel + serial execution with dependency management
+3. **Conservative Safety**: Mandatory test verification with automatic rollback on failure
+4. **Resume Support**: Checkpoint-based recovery for interrupted sessions
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for automated review finding fixes
+- Manages: Planning phase coordination, stage-based execution, agent scheduling, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Fix planning to @cli-planning-agent, fix execution to @cli-execute-agent
+
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Validate export file, create fix session structure, initialize state files
+
+Phase 2: Planning Coordination (@cli-planning-agent)
+   ├─ Analyze findings for patterns and dependencies
+   ├─ Group by file + dimension + root cause similarity
+   ├─ Determine execution strategy (parallel/serial/hybrid)
+   ├─ Generate fix timeline with stages
+   └─ Output: fix-plan.json
+
+Phase 3: Execution Orchestration (Stage-based)
+   For each timeline stage:
+   ├─ Load groups for this stage
+   ├─ If parallel: Launch all group agents simultaneously
+   ├─ If serial: Execute groups sequentially
+   ├─ Each agent:
+   │  ├─ Analyze code context
+   │  ├─ Apply fix per strategy
+   │  ├─ Run affected tests
+   │  ├─ On test failure: Rollback, retry up to max_iterations
+   │  └─ On success: Commit, update fix-progress-{N}.json
+   └─ Advance to next stage
+
+Phase 4: Completion & Aggregation
+   └─ Aggregate results → Generate fix-summary.md → Update history → Output summary
+
+Phase 5: Session Completion (Optional)
+   └─ If all fixes successful → Prompt to complete workflow session
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Input validation, session management, planning coordination, stage-based execution scheduling, progress tracking, aggregation |
+| **@cli-planning-agent** | Findings analysis, intelligent grouping (file+dimension+root cause), execution strategy determination (parallel/serial/hybrid), timeline generation with dependency mapping |
+| **@cli-execute-agent** | Fix execution per group, code context analysis, Edit tool operations, test verification, git rollback on failure, completion JSON generation |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Two-Phase Architecture
+
+**Phase Separation**:
+
+| Phase | Agent | Output | Purpose |
+|-------|-------|--------|---------|
+| **Planning** | @cli-planning-agent | fix-plan.json | Analyze findings, group intelligently, determine optimal execution strategy |
+| **Execution** | @cli-execute-agent | completions/*.json | Execute fixes per plan with test verification and rollback |
+
+**Benefits**:
+- Clear separation of concerns (analysis vs execution)
+- Reusable plans (can re-execute without re-planning)
+- Better error isolation (planning failures vs execution failures)
+
+### 2. Intelligent Grouping Strategy
+
+**Three-Level Grouping**:
+
+```javascript
+// Level 1: Primary grouping by file + dimension
+{file: "auth.ts", dimension: "security"} → Group A
+{file: "auth.ts", dimension: "quality"} → Group B
+{file: "query-builder.ts", dimension: "security"} → Group C
+
+// Level 2: Secondary grouping by root cause similarity
+Group A findings → Semantic similarity analysis (threshold 0.7)
+  → Sub-group A1: "missing-input-validation" (findings 1, 2)
+  → Sub-group A2: "insecure-crypto" (finding 3)
+
+// Level 3: Dependency analysis
+Sub-group A1 creates validation utilities
+Sub-group C4 depends on those utilities
+→ A1 must execute before C4 (serial stage dependency)
+```
+
+**Similarity Computation**:
+- Combine: `description + recommendation + category`
+- Vectorize: TF-IDF or LLM embedding
+- Cluster: Greedy algorithm with cosine similarity > 0.7
+
+### 3. Execution Strategy Determination
+
+**Strategy Types**:
+
+| Strategy | When to Use | Stage Structure |
+|----------|-------------|-----------------|
+| **Parallel** | All groups independent, different files | Single stage, all groups in parallel |
+| **Serial** | Strong dependencies, shared resources | Multiple stages, one group per stage |
+| **Hybrid** | Mixed dependencies | Multiple stages, parallel within stages |
+
+**Dependency Detection**:
+- Shared file modifications
+- Utility creation + usage patterns
+- Test dependency chains
+- Risk level clustering (high-risk groups isolated)
+
+### 4. Conservative Test Verification
+
+**Test Strategy** (per fix):
+
+```javascript
+// 1. Identify affected tests
+const testPattern = identifyTestPattern(finding.file);
+// e.g., "tests/auth/**/*.test.*" for src/auth/service.ts
+
+// 2. Run tests
+const result = await runTests(testPattern);
+
+// 3. Evaluate
+if (result.passRate < 100%) {
+  // Rollback
+  await gitCheckout(finding.file);
+
+  // Retry with failure context
+  if (attempts < maxIterations) {
+    const fixContext = analyzeFailure(result.stderr);
+    regenerateFix(finding, fixContext);
+    retry();
+  } else {
+    markFailed(finding.id);
+  }
+} else {
+  // Commit
+  await gitCommit(`Fix: ${finding.title} [${finding.id}]`);
+  markFixed(finding.id);
+}
+```
+
+**Pass Criteria**: 100% test pass rate (no partial fixes)
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+- Input validation: Check export file exists and is valid JSON
+- Auto-discovery: If review-dir provided, find latest `*-fix-export.json`
+- Session creation: Generate fix-session-id (`fix-{timestamp}`)
+- Directory structure: Create `{review-dir}/fixes/{fix-session-id}/` with subdirectories
+- State files: Initialize active-fix-session.json (session marker)
+- TodoWrite initialization: Set up 4-phase tracking
+
+**Phase 2: Planning Coordination**
+- Launch @cli-planning-agent with findings data and project context
+- Validate fix-plan.json output (schema conformance, includes metadata with session status)
+- Load plan into memory for execution phase
+- TodoWrite update: Mark planning complete, start execution
+
+**Phase 3: Execution Orchestration**
+- Load fix-plan.json timeline stages
+- For each stage:
+  - If parallel mode: Launch all group agents via `Promise.all()`
+  - If serial mode: Execute groups sequentially with `await`
+  - Assign agent IDs (agents update their fix-progress-{N}.json)
+- Handle agent failures gracefully (mark group as failed, continue)
+- Advance to next stage only when current stage complete
+
+**Phase 4: Completion & Aggregation**
+- Collect final status from all fix-progress-{N}.json files
+- Generate fix-summary.md with timeline and results
+- Update fix-history.json with new session entry
+- Remove active-fix-session.json
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all phases done
+- Output summary to user
+
+**Phase 5: Session Completion (Optional)**
+- If all findings fixed successfully (no failures):
+  - Prompt user: "All fixes complete. Complete workflow session? [Y/n]"
+  - If confirmed: Execute `/workflow:session:complete` to archive session with lessons learned
+- If partial success (some failures):
+  - Output: "Some findings failed. Review fix-summary.md before completing session."
+  - Do NOT auto-complete session
+
+### Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── fix-export-{timestamp}.json     # Exported findings (input)
+└── fixes/{fix-session-id}/
+    ├── fix-plan.json               # Planning agent output (execution plan with metadata)
+    ├── fix-progress-1.json         # Group 1 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
+    ├── fix-progress-2.json         # Group 2 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
+    ├── fix-progress-3.json         # Group 3 progress (planning agent init → agent updates)
+    ├── fix-summary.md              # Final report (orchestrator generates)
+    ├── active-fix-session.json     # Active session marker
+    └── fix-history.json            # All sessions history
+```
+
+**File Producers**:
+- **Planning Agent**: `fix-plan.json` (with metadata), all `fix-progress-*.json` (initial state)
+- **Execution Agents**: Update assigned `fix-progress-{N}.json` in real-time
+
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Planning Agent**:
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-planning-agent",
+  description: `Generate fix plan and initialize progress files for ${findings.length} findings`,
+  prompt: `
+## Task Objective
+Analyze ${findings.length} code review findings and generate execution plan with intelligent grouping and timeline coordination.
+
+## Input Data
+Review Session: ${reviewId}
+Fix Session ID: ${fixSessionId}
+Total Findings: ${findings.length}
+
+Findings:
+${JSON.stringify(findings, null, 2)}
+
+Project Context:
+- Structure: ${projectStructure}
+- Test Framework: ${testFramework}
+- Git Status: ${gitStatus}
+
+## Output Requirements
+
+### 1. fix-plan.json
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/fix-plan-template.json
+
+Generate execution plan following template structure:
+
+**Key Generation Rules**:
+- **Metadata**: Populate fix_session_id, review_session_id, status ("planning"), created_at, started_at timestamps
+- **Execution Strategy**: Choose approach (parallel/serial/hybrid) based on dependency analysis, set parallel_limit and stages count
+- **Groups**: Create groups (G1, G2, ...) with intelligent grouping (see Analysis Requirements below), assign progress files (fix-progress-1.json, ...), populate fix_strategy with approach/complexity/test_pattern, assess risks, identify dependencies
+- **Timeline**: Define stages respecting dependencies, set execution_mode per stage, map groups to stages, calculate critical path
+
+### 2. fix-progress-{N}.json (one per group)
+Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/fix-progress-template.json
+
+For each group (G1, G2, G3, ...), generate fix-progress-{N}.json following template structure:
+
+**Initial State Requirements**:
+- Status: "pending", phase: "waiting"
+- Timestamps: Set last_update to now, others null
+- Findings: Populate from review findings with status "pending", all operation fields null
+- Summary: Initialize all counters to zero
+- Flow control: Empty implementation_approach array
+- Errors: Empty array
+
+**CRITICAL**: Ensure complete template structure - all fields must be present.
+
+## Analysis Requirements
+
+### Intelligent Grouping Strategy
+Group findings using these criteria (in priority order):
+
+1. **File Proximity**: Findings in same file or related files
+2. **Dimension Affinity**: Same dimension (security, performance, etc.)
+3. **Root Cause Similarity**: Similar underlying issues
+4. **Fix Approach Commonality**: Can be fixed with similar approach
+
+**Grouping Guidelines**:
+- Optimal group size: 2-5 findings per group
+- Avoid cross-cutting concerns in same group
+- Consider test isolation (different test suites → different groups)
+- Balance workload across groups for parallel execution
+
+### Execution Strategy Determination
+
+**Parallel Mode**: Use when groups are independent, no shared files
+**Serial Mode**: Use when groups have dependencies or shared resources
+**Hybrid Mode**: Use for mixed dependency graphs (recommended for most cases)
+
+**Dependency Analysis**:
+- Identify shared files between groups
+- Detect test dependency chains
+- Evaluate risk of concurrent modifications
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+For each group, evaluate:
+- **Complexity**: Based on code structure, file size, existing tests
+- **Impact Scope**: Number of files affected, API surface changes
+- **Rollback Feasibility**: Ease of reverting changes if tests fail
+
+### Test Strategy
+
+For each group, determine:
+- **Test Pattern**: Glob pattern matching affected tests
+- **Pass Criteria**: All tests must pass (100% pass rate)
+- **Test Command**: Infer from project (package.json, pytest.ini, etc.)
+
+## Output Files
+
+Write to ${sessionDir}:
+- ./fix-plan.json
+- ./fix-progress-1.json
+- ./fix-progress-2.json
+- ./fix-progress-{N}.json (as many as groups created)
+
+## Quality Checklist
+
+Before finalizing outputs:
+- ✅ All findings assigned to exactly one group
+- ✅ Group dependencies correctly identified
+- ✅ Timeline stages respect dependencies
+- ✅ All progress files have complete initial structure
+- ✅ Test patterns are valid and specific
+- ✅ Risk assessments are realistic
+- ✅ Estimated times are reasonable
+  `
+})
+```
+
+**Execution Agent** (per group):
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-execute-agent",
+  description: `Fix ${group.findings.length} issues: ${group.group_name}`,
+  prompt: `
+## Task Objective
+Execute fixes for code review findings in group ${group.group_id}. Update progress file in real-time with flow control tracking.
+
+## Assignment
+- Group ID: ${group.group_id}
+- Group Name: ${group.group_name}
+- Progress File: ${sessionDir}/${group.progress_file}
+- Findings Count: ${group.findings.length}
+- Max Iterations: ${maxIterations} (per finding)
+
+## Fix Strategy
+${JSON.stringify(group.fix_strategy, null, 2)}
+
+## Risk Assessment
+${JSON.stringify(group.risk_assessment, null, 2)}
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Initialization (Before Starting)
+
+1. Read ${group.progress_file} to load initial state
+2. Update progress file:
+   - assigned_agent: "${agentId}"
+   - status: "in-progress"
+   - started_at: Current ISO 8601 timestamp
+   - last_update: Current ISO 8601 timestamp
+3. Write updated state back to ${group.progress_file}
+
+### Main Execution Loop
+
+For EACH finding in ${group.progress_file}.findings:
+
+#### Step 1: Analyze Context
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update finding: status→"in-progress", started_at→now()
+- Update current_finding: Populate with finding details, status→"analyzing", action→"Reading file and understanding code structure"
+- Update phase→"analyzing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "analyze_context" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"analyze_context"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Read file: finding.file
+- Understand code structure around line: finding.line
+- Analyze surrounding context (imports, dependencies, related functions)
+- Review recommendations: finding.recommendations
+
+**After Step**:
+- Update flow_control: Mark "analyze_context" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+#### Step 2: Apply Fix
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update current_finding: status→"fixing", action→"Applying code changes per recommendations"
+- Update phase→"fixing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "apply_fix" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"apply_fix"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Use Edit tool to implement code changes per finding.recommendations
+- Follow fix_strategy.approach
+- Maintain code style and existing patterns
+
+**After Step**:
+- Update flow_control: Mark "apply_fix" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+#### Step 3: Test Verification
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update current_finding: status→"testing", action→"Running test suite to verify fix"
+- Update phase→"testing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "run_tests" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"run_tests"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Run tests using fix_strategy.test_pattern
+- Require 100% pass rate
+- Capture test output
+
+**On Test Failure**:
+- Git rollback: \`git checkout -- \${finding.file}\`
+- Increment finding.attempts
+- Update flow_control: Mark "run_tests" step as "failed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update errors: Add entry (finding_id, error_type→"test_failure", message, timestamp)
+- If finding.attempts < ${maxIterations}:
+  - Reset flow_control: implementation_approach→[], current_step→null
+  - Retry from Step 1
+- Else:
+  - Update finding: status→"completed", result→"failed", error_message→"Max iterations reached", completed_at→now()
+  - Update summary counts, move to next finding
+
+**On Test Success**:
+- Update flow_control: Mark "run_tests" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+- Proceed to Step 4
+
+#### Step 4: Commit Changes
+
+**Before Step**:
+- Update current_finding: status→"committing", action→"Creating git commit for successful fix"
+- Update phase→"committing"
+- Update flow_control: Add "commit_changes" step to implementation_approach (status→"in-progress"), set current_step→"commit_changes"
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+**Action**:
+- Git commit: \`git commit -m "fix(${finding.dimension}): ${finding.title} [${finding.id}]"\`
+- Capture commit hash
+
+**After Step**:
+- Update finding: status→"completed", result→"fixed", commit_hash→<captured>, test_passed→true, completed_at→now()
+- Update flow_control: Mark "commit_changes" step as "completed" with completed_at→now()
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+#### After Each Finding
+
+- Update summary: Recalculate counts (pending/in_progress/fixed/failed) and percent_complete
+- If all findings completed: Clear current_finding, reset flow_control
+- Update last_update→now(), write to ${group.progress_file}
+
+### Final Completion
+
+When all findings processed:
+- Update status→"completed", phase→"done", summary.percent_complete→100.0
+- Update last_update→now(), write final state to ${group.progress_file}
+
+## Critical Requirements
+
+### Progress File Updates
+- **MUST update after every significant action** (before/after each step)
+- **Always maintain complete structure** - never write partial updates
+- **Use ISO 8601 timestamps** - e.g., "2025-01-25T14:36:00Z"
+
+### Flow Control Format
+Follow action-planning-agent flow_control.implementation_approach format:
+- step: Identifier (e.g., "analyze_context", "apply_fix")
+- action: Human-readable description
+- status: "pending" | "in-progress" | "completed" | "failed"
+- started_at: ISO 8601 timestamp or null
+- completed_at: ISO 8601 timestamp or null
+
+### Error Handling
+- Capture all errors in errors[] array
+- Never leave progress file in invalid state
+- Always write complete updates, never partial
+- On unrecoverable error: Mark group as failed, preserve state
+
+## Test Patterns
+Use fix_strategy.test_pattern to run affected tests:
+- Pattern: ${group.fix_strategy.test_pattern}
+- Command: Infer from project (npm test, pytest, etc.)
+- Pass Criteria: 100% pass rate required
+  `
+})
+```
+
+
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Planning Failures**:
+- Invalid template → Abort with error message
+- Insufficient findings data → Request complete export
+- Planning timeout → Retry once, then fail gracefully
+
+**Execution Failures**:
+- Agent crash → Mark group as failed, continue with other groups
+- Test command not found → Skip test verification, warn user
+- Git operations fail → Abort with error, preserve state
+
+**Rollback Scenarios**:
+- Test failure after fix → Automatic `git checkout` rollback
+- Max iterations reached → Leave file unchanged, mark as failed
+- Unrecoverable error → Rollback entire group, save checkpoint
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+**Initialization**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "Phase 2: Planning", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "Phase 3: Execution", status: "pending"},
+    {content: "Phase 4: Completion", status: "pending"}
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**During Execution**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    {content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "Phase 2: Planning", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "Phase 3: Execution", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "  → Stage 1: Parallel execution (3 groups)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "    • Group G1: Auth validation (2 findings)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "    • Group G2: Query security (3 findings)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "    • Group G3: Config quality (1 finding)", status: "completed"},
+    {content: "  → Stage 2: Serial execution (1 group)", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "    • Group G4: Dependent fixes (2 findings)", status: "in_progress"},
+    {content: "Phase 4: Completion", status: "pending"}
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+**Update Rules**:
+- Add stage items dynamically based on fix-plan.json timeline
+- Add group items per stage
+- Mark completed immediately after each group finishes
+- Update parent phase status when all child items complete
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Trust AI Planning**: Planning agent's grouping and execution strategy are based on dependency analysis
+2. **Conservative Approach**: Test verification is mandatory - no fixes kept without passing tests
+3. **Parallel Efficiency**: Default 3 concurrent agents balances speed and resource usage
+4. **Resume Support**: Fix sessions can resume from checkpoints after interruption
+5. **Manual Review**: Always review failed fixes manually - may require architectural changes
+6. **Incremental Fixing**: Start with small batches (5-10 findings) before large-scale fixes
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### View Fix Progress
+Use `ccw view` to open the workflow dashboard in browser:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+

.claude/commands/workflow/review-module-cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,771 @@
+---
+name: review-module-cycle
+description: Independent multi-dimensional code review for specified modules/files. Analyzes specific code paths across 7 dimensions with hybrid parallel-iterative execution, independent of workflow sessions.
+argument-hint: "<path-pattern> [--dimensions=security,architecture,...] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Module-Cycle Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Review specific module (all 7 dimensions)
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**
+
+# Review multiple modules
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**,src/payment/**
+
+# Review with custom dimensions
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/payment/** --dimensions=security,architecture,quality
+
+# Review specific files
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/payment/processor.ts,src/payment/validator.ts
+```
+
+**Review Scope**: Specified modules/files only (independent of git history)
+**Session Requirement**: Auto-creates workflow session via `/workflow:session:start`
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/` (session-based)
+**Default Dimensions**: Security, Architecture, Quality, Action-Items, Performance, Maintainability, Best-Practices
+**Max Iterations**: 3 (adjustable via --max-iterations)
+**Default Iterations**: 1 (deep-dive runs once; use --max-iterations=0 to skip)
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Independent multi-dimensional code review orchestrator with **hybrid parallel-iterative execution** for comprehensive quality assessment of **specific modules or files**.
+
+**Review Scope**:
+- **Module-based**: Reviews specified file patterns (e.g., `src/auth/**`, `*.ts`)
+- **Session-integrated**: Runs within workflow session context for unified tracking
+- **Output location**: `.review/` subdirectory within active session
+
+**vs Session Review**:
+- **Session Review** (`review-session-cycle`): Reviews git changes within a workflow session
+- **Module Review** (`review-module-cycle`): Reviews any specified code paths, regardless of git history
+- **Common output**: Both use same `.review/` directory structure within session
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Module-Focused Review**: Target specific code areas independent of git history
+2. **Session-Integrated**: Review results tracked within workflow session for unified management
+3. **Comprehensive Coverage**: Same 7 specialized dimensions as session review
+4. **Intelligent Prioritization**: Automatic identification of critical issues and cross-cutting concerns
+5. **Unified Archive**: Review results archived with session for historical reference
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for independent multi-dimensional module review
+- Manages: dimension coordination, aggregation, iteration control, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Code exploration and analysis to @cli-explore-agent, dimension-specific reviews via Deep Scan mode
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Resolve file patterns, validate paths, initialize state, create output structure
+
+Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (for each dimension)
+   ├─ Launch 7 review agents simultaneously
+   ├─ Each executes CLI analysis via Gemini/Qwen on specified files
+   ├─ Generate dimension JSON + markdown reports
+   └─ Update review-progress.json
+
+Phase 3: Aggregation
+   ├─ Load all dimension JSON files
+   ├─ Calculate severity distribution (critical/high/medium/low)
+   ├─ Identify cross-cutting concerns (files in 3+ dimensions)
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Critical findings OR high > 5 OR critical files → Phase 4 (Iterate)
+      └─ Else → Phase 5 (Complete)
+
+Phase 4: Iterative Deep-Dive (optional)
+   ├─ Select critical findings (max 5 per iteration)
+   ├─ Launch deep-dive agents for root cause analysis
+   ├─ Generate remediation plans with impact assessment
+   ├─ Re-assess severity based on analysis
+   └─ Loop until no critical findings OR max iterations
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   └─ Finalize review-progress.json
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Phase control, path resolution, state management, aggregation logic, iteration control |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Review) | Execute dimension-specific code analysis via Deep Scan mode, generate findings JSON with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini), create structured analysis reports |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Deep-dive) | Focused root cause analysis using dependency mapping, remediation planning with architectural insights, impact assessment, severity re-assessment |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Review Dimensions Configuration
+
+**7 Specialized Dimensions** with priority-based allocation:
+
+| Dimension | Template | Priority | Timeout |
+|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
+| **Security** | 03-assess-security-risks.txt | 1 (Critical) | 60min |
+| **Architecture** | 02-review-architecture.txt | 2 (High) | 60min |
+| **Quality** | 02-review-code-quality.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Action-Items** | 02-analyze-code-patterns.txt | 2 (High) | 40min |
+| **Performance** | 03-analyze-performance.txt | 3 (Medium) | 60min |
+| **Maintainability** | 02-review-code-quality.txt* | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Best-Practices** | 03-review-quality-standards.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+
+*Custom focus: "Assess technical debt and maintainability"
+
+**Category Definitions by Dimension**:
+
+```javascript
+const CATEGORIES = {
+  security: ['injection', 'authentication', 'authorization', 'encryption', 'input-validation', 'access-control', 'data-exposure'],
+  architecture: ['coupling', 'cohesion', 'layering', 'dependency', 'pattern-violation', 'scalability', 'separation-of-concerns'],
+  quality: ['code-smell', 'duplication', 'complexity', 'naming', 'error-handling', 'testability', 'readability'],
+  'action-items': ['requirement-coverage', 'acceptance-criteria', 'documentation', 'deployment-readiness', 'missing-functionality'],
+  performance: ['n-plus-one', 'inefficient-query', 'memory-leak', 'blocking-operation', 'caching', 'resource-usage'],
+  maintainability: ['technical-debt', 'magic-number', 'long-method', 'large-class', 'dead-code', 'commented-code'],
+  'best-practices': ['convention-violation', 'anti-pattern', 'deprecated-api', 'missing-validation', 'inconsistent-style']
+};
+```
+
+### 2. Path Pattern Resolution
+
+**Syntax Rules**:
+- All paths are **relative** from project root (e.g., `src/auth/**` not `/src/auth/**`)
+- Multiple patterns: comma-separated, **no spaces** (e.g., `src/auth/**,src/payment/**`)
+- Glob and specific files can be mixed (e.g., `src/auth/**,src/config.ts`)
+
+**Supported Patterns**:
+| Pattern Type | Example | Description |
+|--------------|---------|-------------|
+| Glob directory | `src/auth/**` | All files under src/auth/ |
+| Glob with extension | `src/**/*.ts` | All .ts files under src/ |
+| Specific file | `src/payment/processor.ts` | Single file |
+| Multiple patterns | `src/auth/**,src/payment/**` | Comma-separated (no spaces) |
+
+**Resolution Process**:
+1. Parse input pattern (split by comma, trim whitespace)
+2. Expand glob patterns to file list via `find` command
+3. Validate all files exist and are readable
+4. Error if pattern matches 0 files
+5. Store resolved file list in review-state.json
+
+### 3. Aggregation Logic
+
+**Cross-Cutting Concern Detection**:
+1. Files appearing in 3+ dimensions = **Critical Files**
+2. Same issue pattern across dimensions = **Systemic Issue**
+3. Severity clustering in specific files = **Hotspots**
+
+**Deep-Dive Selection Criteria**:
+- All critical severity findings (priority 1)
+- Top 3 high-severity findings in critical files (priority 2)
+- Max 5 findings per iteration (prevent overwhelm)
+
+### 4. Severity Assessment
+
+**Severity Levels**:
+- **Critical**: Security vulnerabilities, data corruption risks, system-wide failures, authentication/authorization bypass
+- **High**: Feature degradation, performance bottlenecks, architecture violations, significant technical debt
+- **Medium**: Code smells, minor performance issues, style inconsistencies, maintainability concerns
+- **Low**: Documentation gaps, minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic issues
+
+**Iteration Trigger**:
+- Critical findings > 0 OR
+- High findings > 5 OR
+- Critical files count > 0
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+
+**Step 1: Session Creation**
+```javascript
+// Create workflow session for this review (type: review)
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type review \"Code review for [target_pattern]\"")
+
+// Parse output
+const sessionId = output.match(/SESSION_ID: (WFS-[^\s]+)/)[1];
+```
+
+**Step 2: Path Resolution & Validation**
+```bash
+# Expand glob pattern to file list (relative paths from project root)
+find . -path "./src/auth/**" -type f | sed 's|^\./||'
+
+# Validate files exist and are readable
+for file in ${resolvedFiles[@]}; do
+  test -r "$file" || error "File not readable: $file"
+done
+```
+- Parse and expand file patterns (glob support): `src/auth/**` → actual file list
+- Validation: Ensure all specified files exist and are readable
+- Store as **relative paths** from project root (e.g., `src/auth/service.ts`)
+- Agents construct absolute paths dynamically during execution
+
+**Step 3: Output Directory Setup**
+- Output directory: `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.review/`
+- Create directory structure:
+  ```bash
+  mkdir -p ${sessionDir}/.review/{dimensions,iterations,reports}
+  ```
+
+**Step 4: Initialize Review State**
+- State initialization: Create `review-state.json` with metadata, dimensions, max_iterations, resolved_files (merged metadata + state)
+- Progress tracking: Create `review-progress.json` for progress tracking
+
+**Step 5: TodoWrite Initialization**
+- Set up progress tracking with hierarchical structure
+- Mark Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Phase 2: Parallel Review Coordination**
+- Launch 7 @cli-explore-agent instances simultaneously (Deep Scan mode)
+- Pass dimension-specific context (template, timeout, custom focus, **target files**)
+- Monitor completion via review-progress.json updates
+- TodoWrite updates: Mark dimensions as completed
+- CLI tool fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (on error/timeout)
+
+**Phase 3: Aggregation**
+- Load all dimension JSON files from dimensions/
+- Calculate severity distribution: Count by critical/high/medium/low
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns: Files in 3+ dimensions
+- Select deep-dive findings: Critical + high in critical files (max 5)
+- Decision logic: Iterate if critical > 0 OR high > 5 OR critical files exist
+- Update review-state.json with aggregation results
+
+**Phase 4: Iteration Control**
+- Check iteration count < max_iterations (default 3)
+- Launch deep-dive agents for selected findings
+- Collect remediation plans and re-assessed severities
+- Update severity distribution based on re-assessments
+- Record iteration in review-state.json
+- Loop back to aggregation if still have critical/high findings
+
+**Phase 5: Completion**
+- Finalize review-progress.json with completion statistics
+- Update review-state.json with completion_time and phase=complete
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all tasks done
+
+
+
+### Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── review-state.json                    # Orchestrator state machine (includes metadata)
+├── review-progress.json                 # Real-time progress for dashboard
+├── dimensions/                          # Per-dimension results
+│   ├── security.json
+│   ├── architecture.json
+│   ├── quality.json
+│   ├── action-items.json
+│   ├── performance.json
+│   ├── maintainability.json
+│   └── best-practices.json
+├── iterations/                          # Deep-dive results
+│   ├── iteration-1-finding-{uuid}.json
+│   └── iteration-2-finding-{uuid}.json
+└── reports/                             # Human-readable reports
+    ├── security-analysis.md
+    ├── security-cli-output.txt
+    ├── deep-dive-1-{uuid}.md
+    └── ...
+```
+
+**Session Context**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+├── .summaries/
+└── .review/                             # Review results (this command)
+    └── (structure above)
+```
+
+### Review State JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Unified state machine and metadata (merged from metadata + state)
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "review_type": "module",
+  "session_id": "WFS-auth-system",
+  "metadata": {
+    "created_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
+    "target_pattern": "src/auth/**",
+    "resolved_files": [
+      "src/auth/service.ts",
+      "src/auth/validator.ts",
+      "src/auth/middleware.ts"
+    ],
+    "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+    "max_iterations": 3
+  },
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "dimensions_reviewed": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+  "selected_strategy": "comprehensive",
+  "next_action": "execute_parallel_reviews|aggregate_findings|execute_deep_dive|generate_final_report|complete",
+  "severity_distribution": {
+    "critical": 2,
+    "high": 5,
+    "medium": 12,
+    "low": 8
+  },
+  "critical_files": [...],
+  "iterations": [...],
+  "completion_criteria": {...}
+}
+```
+
+### Review Progress JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Real-time dashboard updates via polling
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "last_update": "2025-01-25T14:35:10Z",
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "progress": {
+    "parallel_review": {
+      "total_dimensions": 7,
+      "completed": 5,
+      "in_progress": 2,
+      "percent_complete": 71
+    },
+    "deep_dive": {
+      "total_findings": 6,
+      "analyzed": 2,
+      "in_progress": 1,
+      "percent_complete": 33
+    }
+  },
+  "agent_status": [
+    {
+      "agent_type": "review-agent",
+      "dimension": "security",
+      "status": "completed",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-01-25T15:15:00Z",
+      "duration_ms": 2700000
+    },
+    {
+      "agent_type": "deep-dive-agent",
+      "finding_id": "sec-001-uuid",
+      "status": "in_progress",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:32:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "estimated_completion": "2025-01-25T16:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+### Agent Output Schemas
+
+**Agent-produced JSON files follow standardized schemas**:
+
+1. **Dimension Results** (cli-explore-agent output from parallel reviews)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `{output-dir}/dimensions/{dimension}.json`
+   - Contains: findings array, summary statistics, cross_references
+
+2. **Deep-Dive Results** (cli-explore-agent output from iterations)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `{output-dir}/iterations/iteration-{N}-finding-{uuid}.json`
+   - Contains: root_cause, remediation_plan, impact_assessment, reassessed_severity
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Review Agent** (parallel execution, 7 instances):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Execute ${dimension} review analysis via Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Conduct comprehensive ${dimension} code exploration and analysis using Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source strategy) for specified module files
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Deep Scan mode** for this review:
+    - Phase 1: Bash structural scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
+    - Phase 2: Gemini semantic analysis for design intent, non-standard patterns, ${dimension}-specific concerns
+    - Phase 3: Synthesis with attribution (bash-discovered vs gemini-discovered findings)
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read review state: ${reviewStateJsonPath}
+    2. Get target files: Read resolved_files from review-state.json
+    3. Validate file access: bash(ls -la ${targetFiles.join(' ')})
+    4. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+    5. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack and architecture context)
+    6. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints and conventions to validate against)
+
+    ## Review Context
+    - Review Type: module (independent)
+    - Review Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Review ID: ${reviewId}
+    - Target Pattern: ${targetPattern}
+    - Resolved Files: ${resolvedFiles.length} files
+    - Output Directory: ${outputDir}
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex (fallback chain)
+    - Custom Focus: ${customFocus || 'Standard dimension analysis'}
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+    - Context Pattern: ${targetFiles.map(f => `@${f}`).join(' ')}
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 4, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Dimension Results JSON: ${outputDir}/dimensions/${dimension}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - dimension, review_id, analysis_timestamp (NOT timestamp/analyzed_at)
+       - cli_tool_used (gemini|qwen|codex), model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - summary (FLAT structure), findings, cross_references
+
+       Summary MUST be FLAT (NOT nested by_severity):
+       \`{ "total_findings": N, "critical": N, "high": N, "medium": N, "low": N, "files_analyzed": N, "lines_reviewed": N }\`
+
+       Finding required fields:
+       - id: format \`{dim}-{seq}-{uuid8}\` e.g., \`sec-001-a1b2c3d4\` (lowercase)
+       - severity: lowercase only (critical|high|medium|low)
+       - snippet (NOT code_snippet), impact (NOT exploit_scenario)
+       - metadata, iteration (0), status (pending_remediation), cross_references
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-analysis.md
+       - Human-readable summary with recommendations
+       - Grouped by severity: critical → high → medium → low
+       - Include file:line references for all findings
+
+    3. CLI Output Log: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-cli-output.txt
+       - Raw CLI tool output for debugging
+       - Include full analysis text
+
+    ## Dimension-Specific Guidance
+    ${getDimensionGuidance(dimension)}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-dimension-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] All target files analyzed for ${dimension} concerns
+    - [ ] All findings include file:line references with code snippets
+    - [ ] Severity assessment follows established criteria (see reference)
+    - [ ] Recommendations are actionable with code examples
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] Report is comprehensive and well-organized
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Deep-Dive Agent** (iteration execution):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Deep-dive analysis for critical finding: ${findingTitle} via Dependency Map + Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Perform focused root cause analysis using Dependency Map mode (for impact analysis) + Deep Scan mode (for semantic understanding) to generate comprehensive remediation plan for critical ${dimension} issue
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Dependency Map mode** first to understand dependencies:
+    - Build dependency graph around ${file} to identify affected components
+    - Detect circular dependencies or tight coupling related to this finding
+    - Calculate change risk scores for remediation impact
+
+    Then apply **Deep Scan mode** for semantic analysis:
+    - Understand design intent and architectural context
+    - Identify non-standard patterns or implicit dependencies
+    - Extract remediation insights from code structure
+
+    ## Finding Context
+    - Finding ID: ${findingId}
+    - Original Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Title: ${findingTitle}
+    - File: ${file}:${line}
+    - Severity: ${severity}
+    - Category: ${category}
+    - Original Description: ${description}
+    - Iteration: ${iteration}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read original finding: ${dimensionJsonPath}
+    2. Read affected file: ${file}
+    3. Identify related code: bash(grep -r "import.*${basename(file)}" ${projectDir}/src --include="*.ts")
+    4. Read test files: bash(find ${projectDir}/tests -name "*${basename(file, '.ts')}*" -type f)
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+    6. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack and architecture context)
+    7. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints for remediation compliance)
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Deep-Dive Results JSON: ${outputDir}/iterations/iteration-${iteration}-finding-${findingId}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - finding_id, dimension, iteration, analysis_timestamp
+       - cli_tool_used, model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - original_finding, root_cause, remediation_plan
+       - impact_assessment, reassessed_severity, confidence_score, cross_references
+
+       All nested objects must follow schema exactly - read schema for field names
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/deep-dive-${iteration}-${findingId}.md
+       - Detailed root cause analysis
+       - Step-by-step remediation plan
+       - Impact assessment and rollback strategy
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-deep-dive-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] Root cause clearly identified with supporting evidence
+    - [ ] Remediation plan is step-by-step actionable with exact file:line references
+    - [ ] Each step includes specific commands and validation tests
+    - [ ] Impact fully assessed (files, tests, breaking changes, dependencies)
+    - [ ] Severity re-evaluation justified with evidence
+    - [ ] Confidence score accurately reflects certainty of analysis
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] References include project-specific and external documentation
+  `
+)
+```
+
+### Dimension Guidance Reference
+
+```javascript
+function getDimensionGuidance(dimension) {
+  const guidance = {
+    security: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Input validation and sanitization
+      - Authentication and authorization mechanisms
+      - Data encryption (at-rest and in-transit)
+      - SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
+      - XSS, CSRF, and other web vulnerabilities
+      - Sensitive data exposure
+      - Access control and privilege escalation
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Authentication bypass, SQL injection, RCE, sensitive data exposure
+      - High: Missing authorization checks, weak encryption, exposed secrets
+      - Medium: Missing input validation, insecure defaults, weak password policies
+      - Low: Security headers missing, verbose error messages, outdated dependencies
+    `,
+    architecture: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Layering and separation of concerns
+      - Coupling and cohesion
+      - Design pattern adherence
+      - Dependency management
+      - Scalability and extensibility
+      - Module boundaries
+      - API design consistency
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Circular dependencies, god objects, tight coupling across layers
+      - High: Violated architectural principles, scalability bottlenecks
+      - Medium: Missing abstractions, inconsistent patterns, suboptimal design
+      - Low: Minor coupling issues, documentation gaps, naming inconsistencies
+    `,
+    quality: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Code duplication
+      - Complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
+      - Naming conventions
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Code readability
+      - Comment quality
+      - Dead code
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe complexity (CC > 20), massive duplication (>50 lines)
+      - High: High complexity (CC > 10), significant duplication, poor error handling
+      - Medium: Moderate complexity (CC > 5), naming issues, code smells
+      - Low: Minor duplication, documentation gaps, cosmetic issues
+    `,
+    'action-items': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Requirements coverage verification
+      - Acceptance criteria met
+      - Documentation completeness
+      - Deployment readiness
+      - Missing functionality
+      - Test coverage gaps
+      - Configuration management
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Core requirements not met, deployment blockers
+      - High: Significant functionality missing, acceptance criteria not met
+      - Medium: Minor requirements gaps, documentation incomplete
+      - Low: Nice-to-have features missing, minor documentation gaps
+    `,
+    performance: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - N+1 query problems
+      - Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n log n) possible)
+      - Memory leaks
+      - Blocking operations on main thread
+      - Missing caching opportunities
+      - Resource usage (CPU, memory, network)
+      - Database query optimization
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Memory leaks, O(n²) in hot path, blocking main thread
+      - High: N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms
+      - Medium: Suboptimal caching, unnecessary computations, lazy loading issues
+      - Low: Minor optimization opportunities, redundant operations
+    `,
+    maintainability: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Technical debt indicators
+      - Magic numbers and hardcoded values
+      - Long methods (>50 lines)
+      - Large classes (>500 lines)
+      - Dead code and commented code
+      - Code documentation
+      - Test coverage
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Massive methods (>200 lines), severe technical debt blocking changes
+      - High: Large methods (>100 lines), significant dead code, undocumented complex logic
+      - Medium: Magic numbers, moderate technical debt, missing tests
+      - Low: Minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic improvements
+    `,
+    'best-practices': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Framework conventions adherence
+      - Language idioms
+      - Anti-patterns
+      - Deprecated API usage
+      - Coding standards compliance
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Logging and monitoring
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe anti-patterns, deprecated APIs with security risks
+      - High: Major convention violations, poor error handling, missing logging
+      - Medium: Minor anti-patterns, style inconsistencies, suboptimal patterns
+      - Low: Cosmetic style issues, minor convention deviations
+    `
+  };
+
+  return guidance[dimension] || 'Standard code review analysis';
+}
+```
+
+### Completion Conditions
+
+**Full Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Critical findings = 0
+- High findings ≤ 5
+- Action: Generate final report, mark phase=complete
+
+**Partial Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Max iterations reached
+- Still have critical/high findings
+- Action: Generate report with warnings, recommend follow-up
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase-Level Error Matrix**:
+
+| Phase | Error | Blocking? | Action |
+|-------|-------|-----------|--------|
+| Phase 1 | Invalid path pattern | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No files matched | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | Files not readable | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 2 | Single dimension fails | No | Log warning, continue other dimensions |
+| Phase 2 | All dimensions fail | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 3 | Missing dimension JSON | No | Skip in aggregation, log warning |
+| Phase 4 | Deep-dive agent fails | No | Skip finding, continue others |
+| Phase 4 | Max iterations reached | No | Generate partial report |
+
+**CLI Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → degraded mode
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+1. HTTP 429, 5xx errors, connection timeout
+2. Invalid JSON output (parse error, missing required fields)
+3. Low confidence score < 0.4
+4. Analysis too brief (< 100 words in report)
+
+**Fallback Behavior**:
+- On trigger: Retry with next tool in chain
+- After Codex fails: Enter degraded mode (skip analysis, log error)
+- Degraded mode: Continue workflow with available results
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing" },
+    { content: "Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (7 dimensions)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Reviewing" },
+    { content: "  → Security review", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Analyzing security" },
+    // ... other dimensions as sub-items
+    { content: "Phase 3: Aggregation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Aggregating" },
+    { content: "Phase 4: Deep-dive", status: "pending", activeForm: "Deep-diving" },
+    { content: "Phase 5: Completion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Completing" }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Start Specific**: Begin with focused module patterns for faster results
+2. **Expand Gradually**: Add more modules based on initial findings
+3. **Use Glob Wisely**: `src/auth/**` is more efficient than `src/**` with lots of irrelevant files
+4. **Trust Aggregation Logic**: Auto-selection based on proven heuristics
+5. **Monitor Logs**: Check reports/ directory for CLI analysis insights
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### View Review Progress
+Use `ccw view` to open the review dashboard in browser:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+### Automated Fix Workflow
+After completing a module review, use the generated findings JSON for automated fixing:
+
+```bash
+# Step 1: Complete review (this command)
+/workflow:review-module-cycle src/auth/**
+
+# Step 2: Run automated fixes using dimension findings
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+```
+
+See `/workflow:review-fix` for automated fixing with smart grouping, parallel execution, and test verification.
+

.claude/commands/workflow/review-session-cycle.md

@@ -0,0 +1,782 @@
+---
+name: review-session-cycle
+description: Session-based comprehensive multi-dimensional code review. Analyzes git changes from workflow session across 7 dimensions with hybrid parallel-iterative execution, aggregates findings, and performs focused deep-dives on critical issues until quality gates met.
+argument-hint: "[session-id] [--dimensions=security,architecture,...] [--max-iterations=N]"
+allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Task(*)
+---
+
+# Workflow Review-Session-Cycle Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Execute comprehensive session review (all 7 dimensions)
+/workflow:review-session-cycle
+
+# Review specific session with custom dimensions
+/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-payment-integration --dimensions=security,architecture,quality
+
+# Specify session and iteration limit
+/workflow:review-session-cycle WFS-payment-integration --max-iterations=5
+```
+
+**Review Scope**: Git changes from session creation to present (via `git log --since`)
+**Session Requirement**: Requires active or completed workflow session
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/` (session-based)
+**Default Dimensions**: Security, Architecture, Quality, Action-Items, Performance, Maintainability, Best-Practices
+**Max Iterations**: 3 (adjustable via --max-iterations)
+**Default Iterations**: 1 (deep-dive runs once; use --max-iterations=0 to skip)
+**CLI Tools**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (fallback chain)
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+Session-based multi-dimensional code review orchestrator with **hybrid parallel-iterative execution** for comprehensive quality assessment of **git changes within a workflow session**.
+
+**Review Scope**:
+- **Session-based**: Reviews only files changed during the workflow session (via `git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}"`)
+- **For independent module review**: Use `/workflow:review-module-cycle` command instead
+
+**vs Standard Review**:
+- **Standard**: Sequential manual reviews → Inconsistent coverage → Missed cross-cutting concerns
+- **Review-Session-Cycle**: **Parallel automated analysis → Aggregate findings → Deep-dive critical issues** → Comprehensive coverage
+
+### Value Proposition
+1. **Comprehensive Coverage**: 7 specialized dimensions analyze all quality aspects simultaneously
+2. **Intelligent Prioritization**: Automatic identification of critical issues and cross-cutting concerns
+3. **Actionable Insights**: Deep-dive iterations provide step-by-step remediation plans
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+- **ONLY command** for comprehensive multi-dimensional review
+- Manages: dimension coordination, aggregation, iteration control, progress tracking
+- Delegates: Code exploration and analysis to @cli-explore-agent, dimension-specific reviews via Deep Scan mode
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Execution Flow (Simplified)
+
+```
+Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization
+   └─ Validate session, initialize state, create output structure
+
+Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (for each dimension)
+   ├─ Launch 7 review agents simultaneously
+   ├─ Each executes CLI analysis via Gemini/Qwen
+   ├─ Generate dimension JSON + markdown reports
+   └─ Update review-progress.json
+
+Phase 3: Aggregation
+   ├─ Load all dimension JSON files
+   ├─ Calculate severity distribution (critical/high/medium/low)
+   ├─ Identify cross-cutting concerns (files in 3+ dimensions)
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Critical findings OR high > 5 OR critical files → Phase 4 (Iterate)
+      └─ Else → Phase 5 (Complete)
+
+Phase 4: Iterative Deep-Dive (optional)
+   ├─ Select critical findings (max 5 per iteration)
+   ├─ Launch deep-dive agents for root cause analysis
+   ├─ Generate remediation plans with impact assessment
+   ├─ Re-assess severity based on analysis
+   └─ Loop until no critical findings OR max iterations
+
+Phase 5: Completion
+   └─ Finalize review-progress.json
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Phase control, session discovery, state management, aggregation logic, iteration control |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Review) | Execute dimension-specific code analysis via Deep Scan mode, generate findings JSON with dual-source strategy (Bash + Gemini), create structured analysis reports |
+| **@cli-explore-agent** (Deep-dive) | Focused root cause analysis using dependency mapping, remediation planning with architectural insights, impact assessment, severity re-assessment |
+
+## Enhanced Features
+
+### 1. Review Dimensions Configuration
+
+**7 Specialized Dimensions** with priority-based allocation:
+
+| Dimension | Template | Priority | Timeout |
+|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
+| **Security** | 03-assess-security-risks.txt | 1 (Critical) | 60min |
+| **Architecture** | 02-review-architecture.txt | 2 (High) | 60min |
+| **Quality** | 02-review-code-quality.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Action-Items** | 02-analyze-code-patterns.txt | 2 (High) | 40min |
+| **Performance** | 03-analyze-performance.txt | 3 (Medium) | 60min |
+| **Maintainability** | 02-review-code-quality.txt* | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+| **Best-Practices** | 03-review-quality-standards.txt | 3 (Medium) | 40min |
+
+*Custom focus: "Assess technical debt and maintainability"
+
+**Category Definitions by Dimension**:
+
+```javascript
+const CATEGORIES = {
+  security: ['injection', 'authentication', 'authorization', 'encryption', 'input-validation', 'access-control', 'data-exposure'],
+  architecture: ['coupling', 'cohesion', 'layering', 'dependency', 'pattern-violation', 'scalability', 'separation-of-concerns'],
+  quality: ['code-smell', 'duplication', 'complexity', 'naming', 'error-handling', 'testability', 'readability'],
+  'action-items': ['requirement-coverage', 'acceptance-criteria', 'documentation', 'deployment-readiness', 'missing-functionality'],
+  performance: ['n-plus-one', 'inefficient-query', 'memory-leak', 'blocking-operation', 'caching', 'resource-usage'],
+  maintainability: ['technical-debt', 'magic-number', 'long-method', 'large-class', 'dead-code', 'commented-code'],
+  'best-practices': ['convention-violation', 'anti-pattern', 'deprecated-api', 'missing-validation', 'inconsistent-style']
+};
+```
+
+### 2. Aggregation Logic
+
+**Cross-Cutting Concern Detection**:
+1. Files appearing in 3+ dimensions = **Critical Files**
+2. Same issue pattern across dimensions = **Systemic Issue**
+3. Severity clustering in specific files = **Hotspots**
+
+**Deep-Dive Selection Criteria**:
+- All critical severity findings (priority 1)
+- Top 3 high-severity findings in critical files (priority 2)
+- Max 5 findings per iteration (prevent overwhelm)
+
+### 3. Severity Assessment
+
+**Severity Levels**:
+- **Critical**: Security vulnerabilities, data corruption risks, system-wide failures, authentication/authorization bypass
+- **High**: Feature degradation, performance bottlenecks, architecture violations, significant technical debt
+- **Medium**: Code smells, minor performance issues, style inconsistencies, maintainability concerns
+- **Low**: Documentation gaps, minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic issues
+
+**Iteration Trigger**:
+- Critical findings > 0 OR
+- High findings > 5 OR
+- Critical files count > 0
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Orchestrator
+
+**Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization**
+
+**Step 1: Session Discovery**
+```javascript
+// If session ID not provided, auto-detect
+if (!providedSessionId) {
+  // Check for active sessions
+  const activeSessions = Glob('.workflow/active/WFS-*');
+  if (activeSessions.length === 1) {
+    sessionId = activeSessions[0].match(/WFS-[^/]+/)[0];
+  } else if (activeSessions.length > 1) {
+    // List sessions and prompt user
+    error("Multiple active sessions found. Please specify session ID.");
+  } else {
+    error("No active session found. Create session first with /workflow:session:start");
+  }
+} else {
+  sessionId = providedSessionId;
+}
+
+// Validate session exists
+Bash(`test -d .workflow/active/${sessionId} && echo "EXISTS"`);
+```
+
+**Step 2: Session Validation**
+- Ensure session has implementation artifacts (check `.summaries/` or `.task/` directory)
+- Extract session creation timestamp from `workflow-session.json`
+- Use timestamp for git log filtering: `git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}"`
+
+**Step 3: Changed Files Detection**
+```bash
+# Get files changed since session creation
+git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+```
+
+**Step 4: Output Directory Setup**
+- Output directory: `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.review/`
+- Create directory structure:
+  ```bash
+  mkdir -p ${sessionDir}/.review/{dimensions,iterations,reports}
+  ```
+
+**Step 5: Initialize Review State**
+- State initialization: Create `review-state.json` with metadata, dimensions, max_iterations (merged metadata + state)
+- Progress tracking: Create `review-progress.json` for progress tracking
+
+**Step 6: TodoWrite Initialization**
+- Set up progress tracking with hierarchical structure
+- Mark Phase 1 completed, Phase 2 in_progress
+
+**Phase 2: Parallel Review Coordination**
+- Launch 7 @cli-explore-agent instances simultaneously (Deep Scan mode)
+- Pass dimension-specific context (template, timeout, custom focus)
+- Monitor completion via review-progress.json updates
+- TodoWrite updates: Mark dimensions as completed
+- CLI tool fallback: Gemini → Qwen → Codex (on error/timeout)
+
+**Phase 3: Aggregation**
+- Load all dimension JSON files from dimensions/
+- Calculate severity distribution: Count by critical/high/medium/low
+- Identify cross-cutting concerns: Files in 3+ dimensions
+- Select deep-dive findings: Critical + high in critical files (max 5)
+- Decision logic: Iterate if critical > 0 OR high > 5 OR critical files exist
+- Update review-state.json with aggregation results
+
+**Phase 4: Iteration Control**
+- Check iteration count < max_iterations (default 3)
+- Launch deep-dive agents for selected findings
+- Collect remediation plans and re-assessed severities
+- Update severity distribution based on re-assessments
+- Record iteration in review-state.json
+- Loop back to aggregation if still have critical/high findings
+
+**Phase 5: Completion**
+- Finalize review-progress.json with completion statistics
+- Update review-state.json with completion_time and phase=complete
+- TodoWrite completion: Mark all tasks done
+
+
+
+### Session File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+├── review-state.json                    # Orchestrator state machine (includes metadata)
+├── review-progress.json                 # Real-time progress for dashboard
+├── dimensions/                          # Per-dimension results
+│   ├── security.json
+│   ├── architecture.json
+│   ├── quality.json
+│   ├── action-items.json
+│   ├── performance.json
+│   ├── maintainability.json
+│   └── best-practices.json
+├── iterations/                          # Deep-dive results
+│   ├── iteration-1-finding-{uuid}.json
+│   └── iteration-2-finding-{uuid}.json
+└── reports/                             # Human-readable reports
+    ├── security-analysis.md
+    ├── security-cli-output.txt
+    ├── deep-dive-1-{uuid}.md
+    └── ...
+```
+
+**Session Context**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md
+├── TODO_LIST.md
+├── .task/
+├── .summaries/
+└── .review/                             # Review results (this command)
+    └── (structure above)
+```
+
+### Review State JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Unified state machine and metadata (merged from metadata + state)
+
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-payment-integration",
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "review_type": "session",
+  "metadata": {
+    "created_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:22Z",
+    "git_changes": {
+      "commit_range": "abc123..def456",
+      "files_changed": 15,
+      "insertions": 342,
+      "deletions": 128
+    },
+    "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+    "max_iterations": 3
+  },
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "dimensions_reviewed": ["security", "architecture", "quality", "action-items", "performance", "maintainability", "best-practices"],
+  "selected_strategy": "comprehensive",
+  "next_action": "execute_parallel_reviews|aggregate_findings|execute_deep_dive|generate_final_report|complete",
+  "severity_distribution": {
+    "critical": 2,
+    "high": 5,
+    "medium": 12,
+    "low": 8
+  },
+  "critical_files": [
+    {
+      "file": "src/payment/processor.ts",
+      "finding_count": 5,
+      "dimensions": ["security", "architecture", "quality"]
+    }
+  ],
+  "iterations": [
+    {
+      "iteration": 1,
+      "findings_analyzed": ["uuid-1", "uuid-2"],
+      "findings_resolved": 1,
+      "findings_escalated": 1,
+      "severity_change": {
+        "before": {"critical": 2, "high": 5, "medium": 12, "low": 8},
+        "after": {"critical": 1, "high": 6, "medium": 12, "low": 8}
+      },
+      "timestamp": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "completion_criteria": {
+    "target": "no_critical_findings_and_high_under_5",
+    "current_status": "in_progress",
+    "estimated_completion": "2 iterations remaining"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Field Descriptions**:
+- `phase`: Current execution phase (state machine pointer)
+- `current_iteration`: Iteration counter (used for max check)
+- `next_action`: Next step orchestrator should execute
+- `severity_distribution`: Aggregated counts across all dimensions
+- `critical_files`: Files appearing in 3+ dimensions with metadata
+- `iterations[]`: Historical log for trend analysis
+
+### Review Progress JSON
+
+**Purpose**: Real-time dashboard updates via polling
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_id": "review-20250125-143022",
+  "last_update": "2025-01-25T14:35:10Z",
+  "phase": "parallel|aggregate|iterate|complete",
+  "current_iteration": 1,
+  "progress": {
+    "parallel_review": {
+      "total_dimensions": 7,
+      "completed": 5,
+      "in_progress": 2,
+      "percent_complete": 71
+    },
+    "deep_dive": {
+      "total_findings": 6,
+      "analyzed": 2,
+      "in_progress": 1,
+      "percent_complete": 33
+    }
+  },
+  "agent_status": [
+    {
+      "agent_type": "review-agent",
+      "dimension": "security",
+      "status": "completed",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:30:00Z",
+      "completed_at": "2025-01-25T15:15:00Z",
+      "duration_ms": 2700000
+    },
+    {
+      "agent_type": "deep-dive-agent",
+      "finding_id": "sec-001-uuid",
+      "status": "in_progress",
+      "started_at": "2025-01-25T14:32:00Z"
+    }
+  ],
+  "estimated_completion": "2025-01-25T16:00:00Z"
+}
+```
+
+### Agent Output Schemas
+
+**Agent-produced JSON files follow standardized schemas**:
+
+1. **Dimension Results** (cli-explore-agent output from parallel reviews)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `.review-cycle/dimensions/{dimension}.json`
+   - Contains: findings array, summary statistics, cross_references
+
+2. **Deep-Dive Results** (cli-explore-agent output from iterations)
+   - Schema: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json`
+   - Output: `.review-cycle/iterations/iteration-{N}-finding-{uuid}.json`
+   - Contains: root_cause, remediation_plan, impact_assessment, reassessed_severity
+
+### Agent Invocation Template
+
+**Review Agent** (parallel execution, 7 instances):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Execute ${dimension} review analysis via Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Conduct comprehensive ${dimension} code exploration and analysis using Deep Scan mode (Bash + Gemini dual-source strategy) for completed implementation in session ${sessionId}
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Deep Scan mode** for this review:
+    - Phase 1: Bash structural scan for standard patterns (classes, functions, imports)
+    - Phase 2: Gemini semantic analysis for design intent, non-standard patterns, ${dimension}-specific concerns
+    - Phase 3: Synthesis with attribution (bash-discovered vs gemini-discovered findings)
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read session metadata: ${sessionMetadataPath}
+    2. Read completed task summaries: bash(find ${summariesDir} -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f)
+    3. Get changed files: bash(cd ${workflowDir} && git log --since="${sessionCreatedAt}" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u)
+    4. Read review state: ${reviewStateJsonPath}
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-dimension-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+    6. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack and architecture context)
+    7. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints and conventions to validate against)
+
+    ## Session Context
+    - Session ID: ${sessionId}
+    - Review Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Review ID: ${reviewId}
+    - Implementation Phase: Complete (all tests passing)
+    - Output Directory: ${outputDir}
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex (fallback chain)
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/${dimensionTemplate}
+    - Custom Focus: ${customFocus || 'Standard dimension analysis'}
+    - Timeout: ${timeout}ms
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Dimension Results JSON: ${outputDir}/dimensions/${dimension}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - dimension, review_id, analysis_timestamp (NOT timestamp/analyzed_at)
+       - cli_tool_used (gemini|qwen|codex), model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - summary (FLAT structure), findings, cross_references
+
+       Summary MUST be FLAT (NOT nested by_severity):
+       \`{ "total_findings": N, "critical": N, "high": N, "medium": N, "low": N, "files_analyzed": N, "lines_reviewed": N }\`
+
+       Finding required fields:
+       - id: format \`{dim}-{seq}-{uuid8}\` e.g., \`sec-001-a1b2c3d4\` (lowercase)
+       - severity: lowercase only (critical|high|medium|low)
+       - snippet (NOT code_snippet), impact (NOT exploit_scenario)
+       - metadata, iteration (0), status (pending_remediation), cross_references
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-analysis.md
+       - Human-readable summary with recommendations
+       - Grouped by severity: critical → high → medium → low
+       - Include file:line references for all findings
+
+    3. CLI Output Log: ${outputDir}/reports/${dimension}-cli-output.txt
+       - Raw CLI tool output for debugging
+       - Include full analysis text
+
+    ## Dimension-Specific Guidance
+    ${getDimensionGuidance(dimension)}
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-dimension-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] All changed files analyzed for ${dimension} concerns
+    - [ ] All findings include file:line references with code snippets
+    - [ ] Severity assessment follows established criteria (see reference)
+    - [ ] Recommendations are actionable with code examples
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] Report is comprehensive and well-organized
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Deep-Dive Agent** (iteration execution):
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=`Deep-dive analysis for critical finding: ${findingTitle} via Dependency Map + Deep Scan`,
+  prompt=`
+    ## Task Objective
+    Perform focused root cause analysis using Dependency Map mode (for impact analysis) + Deep Scan mode (for semantic understanding) to generate comprehensive remediation plan for critical ${dimension} issue
+
+    ## Analysis Mode Selection
+    Use **Dependency Map mode** first to understand dependencies:
+    - Build dependency graph around ${file} to identify affected components
+    - Detect circular dependencies or tight coupling related to this finding
+    - Calculate change risk scores for remediation impact
+
+    Then apply **Deep Scan mode** for semantic analysis:
+    - Understand design intent and architectural context
+    - Identify non-standard patterns or implicit dependencies
+    - Extract remediation insights from code structure
+
+    ## Finding Context
+    - Finding ID: ${findingId}
+    - Original Dimension: ${dimension}
+    - Title: ${findingTitle}
+    - File: ${file}:${line}
+    - Severity: ${severity}
+    - Category: ${category}
+    - Original Description: ${description}
+    - Iteration: ${iteration}
+
+    ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+    **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+    1. Read original finding: ${dimensionJsonPath}
+    2. Read affected file: ${file}
+    3. Identify related code: bash(grep -r "import.*${basename(file)}" ${workflowDir}/src --include="*.ts")
+    4. Read test files: bash(find ${workflowDir}/tests -name "*${basename(file, '.ts')}*" -type f)
+    5. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/review-deep-dive-results-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+    6. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack and architecture context)
+    7. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints for remediation compliance)
+
+    ## CLI Configuration
+    - Tool Priority: gemini → qwen → codex
+    - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt
+    - Timeout: 2400000ms (40 minutes)
+    - Mode: analysis (READ-ONLY)
+
+    ## Expected Deliverables
+
+    **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 5, follow schema exactly
+
+    1. Deep-Dive Results JSON: ${outputDir}/iterations/iteration-${iteration}-finding-${findingId}.json
+
+       **⚠️ CRITICAL JSON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS**:
+
+       Root structure MUST be array: \`[{ ... }]\` NOT \`{ ... }\`
+
+       Required top-level fields:
+       - finding_id, dimension, iteration, analysis_timestamp
+       - cli_tool_used, model, analysis_duration_ms
+       - original_finding, root_cause, remediation_plan
+       - impact_assessment, reassessed_severity, confidence_score, cross_references
+
+       All nested objects must follow schema exactly - read schema for field names
+
+    2. Analysis Report: ${outputDir}/reports/deep-dive-${iteration}-${findingId}.md
+       - Detailed root cause analysis
+       - Step-by-step remediation plan
+       - Impact assessment and rollback strategy
+
+    ## Success Criteria
+    - [ ] Schema obtained via cat review-deep-dive-results-schema.json
+    - [ ] Root cause clearly identified with supporting evidence
+    - [ ] Remediation plan is step-by-step actionable with exact file:line references
+    - [ ] Each step includes specific commands and validation tests
+    - [ ] Impact fully assessed (files, tests, breaking changes, dependencies)
+    - [ ] Severity re-evaluation justified with evidence
+    - [ ] Confidence score accurately reflects certainty of analysis
+    - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+    - [ ] References include project-specific and external documentation
+  `
+)
+```
+
+### Dimension Guidance Reference
+
+```javascript
+function getDimensionGuidance(dimension) {
+  const guidance = {
+    security: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Input validation and sanitization
+      - Authentication and authorization mechanisms
+      - Data encryption (at-rest and in-transit)
+      - SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
+      - XSS, CSRF, and other web vulnerabilities
+      - Sensitive data exposure
+      - Access control and privilege escalation
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Authentication bypass, SQL injection, RCE, sensitive data exposure
+      - High: Missing authorization checks, weak encryption, exposed secrets
+      - Medium: Missing input validation, insecure defaults, weak password policies
+      - Low: Security headers missing, verbose error messages, outdated dependencies
+    `,
+    architecture: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Layering and separation of concerns
+      - Coupling and cohesion
+      - Design pattern adherence
+      - Dependency management
+      - Scalability and extensibility
+      - Module boundaries
+      - API design consistency
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Circular dependencies, god objects, tight coupling across layers
+      - High: Violated architectural principles, scalability bottlenecks
+      - Medium: Missing abstractions, inconsistent patterns, suboptimal design
+      - Low: Minor coupling issues, documentation gaps, naming inconsistencies
+    `,
+    quality: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Code duplication
+      - Complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
+      - Naming conventions
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Code readability
+      - Comment quality
+      - Dead code
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe complexity (CC > 20), massive duplication (>50 lines)
+      - High: High complexity (CC > 10), significant duplication, poor error handling
+      - Medium: Moderate complexity (CC > 5), naming issues, code smells
+      - Low: Minor duplication, documentation gaps, cosmetic issues
+    `,
+    'action-items': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Requirements coverage verification
+      - Acceptance criteria met
+      - Documentation completeness
+      - Deployment readiness
+      - Missing functionality
+      - Test coverage gaps
+      - Configuration management
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Core requirements not met, deployment blockers
+      - High: Significant functionality missing, acceptance criteria not met
+      - Medium: Minor requirements gaps, documentation incomplete
+      - Low: Nice-to-have features missing, minor documentation gaps
+    `,
+    performance: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - N+1 query problems
+      - Inefficient algorithms (O(n²) where O(n log n) possible)
+      - Memory leaks
+      - Blocking operations on main thread
+      - Missing caching opportunities
+      - Resource usage (CPU, memory, network)
+      - Database query optimization
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Memory leaks, O(n²) in hot path, blocking main thread
+      - High: N+1 queries, missing indexes, inefficient algorithms
+      - Medium: Suboptimal caching, unnecessary computations, lazy loading issues
+      - Low: Minor optimization opportunities, redundant operations
+    `,
+    maintainability: `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Technical debt indicators
+      - Magic numbers and hardcoded values
+      - Long methods (>50 lines)
+      - Large classes (>500 lines)
+      - Dead code and commented code
+      - Code documentation
+      - Test coverage
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Massive methods (>200 lines), severe technical debt blocking changes
+      - High: Large methods (>100 lines), significant dead code, undocumented complex logic
+      - Medium: Magic numbers, moderate technical debt, missing tests
+      - Low: Minor refactoring opportunities, cosmetic improvements
+    `,
+    'best-practices': `
+      Focus Areas:
+      - Framework conventions adherence
+      - Language idioms
+      - Anti-patterns
+      - Deprecated API usage
+      - Coding standards compliance
+      - Error handling patterns
+      - Logging and monitoring
+
+      Severity Criteria:
+      - Critical: Severe anti-patterns, deprecated APIs with security risks
+      - High: Major convention violations, poor error handling, missing logging
+      - Medium: Minor anti-patterns, style inconsistencies, suboptimal patterns
+      - Low: Cosmetic style issues, minor convention deviations
+    `
+  };
+
+  return guidance[dimension] || 'Standard code review analysis';
+}
+```
+
+### Completion Conditions
+
+**Full Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Critical findings = 0
+- High findings ≤ 5
+- Action: Generate final report, mark phase=complete
+
+**Partial Success**:
+- All dimensions reviewed
+- Max iterations reached
+- Still have critical/high findings
+- Action: Generate report with warnings, recommend follow-up
+
+### Error Handling
+
+**Phase-Level Error Matrix**:
+
+| Phase | Error | Blocking? | Action |
+|-------|-------|-----------|--------|
+| Phase 1 | Session not found | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No completed tasks | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 1 | No changed files | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 2 | Single dimension fails | No | Log warning, continue other dimensions |
+| Phase 2 | All dimensions fail | Yes | Error and exit |
+| Phase 3 | Missing dimension JSON | No | Skip in aggregation, log warning |
+| Phase 4 | Deep-dive agent fails | No | Skip finding, continue others |
+| Phase 4 | Max iterations reached | No | Generate partial report |
+
+**CLI Fallback Chain**: Gemini → Qwen → Codex → degraded mode
+
+**Fallback Triggers**:
+1. HTTP 429, 5xx errors, connection timeout
+2. Invalid JSON output (parse error, missing required fields)
+3. Low confidence score < 0.4
+4. Analysis too brief (< 100 words in report)
+
+**Fallback Behavior**:
+- On trigger: Retry with next tool in chain
+- After Codex fails: Enter degraded mode (skip analysis, log error)
+- Degraded mode: Continue workflow with available results
+
+### TodoWrite Structure
+
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: [
+    { content: "Phase 1: Discovery & Initialization", status: "completed", activeForm: "Initializing" },
+    { content: "Phase 2: Parallel Reviews (7 dimensions)", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Reviewing" },
+    { content: "  → Security review", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Analyzing security" },
+    // ... other dimensions as sub-items
+    { content: "Phase 3: Aggregation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Aggregating" },
+    { content: "Phase 4: Deep-dive", status: "pending", activeForm: "Deep-diving" },
+    { content: "Phase 5: Completion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Completing" }
+  ]
+});
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Default Settings Work**: 7 dimensions + 3 iterations sufficient for most cases
+2. **Parallel Execution**: ~60 minutes for full initial review (7 dimensions)
+3. **Trust Aggregation Logic**: Auto-selection based on proven heuristics
+4. **Monitor Logs**: Check reports/ directory for CLI analysis insights
+
+## Related Commands
+
+### View Review Progress
+Use `ccw view` to open the review dashboard in browser:
+
+```bash
+ccw view
+```
+
+### Automated Fix Workflow
+After completing a review, use the generated findings JSON for automated fixing:
+
+```bash
+# Step 1: Complete review (this command)
+/workflow:review-session-cycle
+
+# Step 2: Run automated fixes using dimension findings
+/workflow:review-fix .workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/.review/
+```
+
+See `/workflow:review-fix` for automated fixing with smart grouping, parallel execution, and test verification.
+

.claude/commands/workflow/review.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: review
 description: Post-implementation review with specialized types (security/architecture/action-items/quality) using analysis agents and Gemini
-argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [optional: session-id]"
+argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [--archived] [optional: session-id]"
 ---
 
 ## Command Overview: /workflow:review
@@ -29,27 +29,70 @@ argument-hint: "[--type=security|architecture|action-items|quality] [optional: s
 - For documentation generation, use `/workflow:tools:docs`
 - For CLAUDE.md updates, use `/update-memory-related`
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse --type flag (default: quality)
+   ├─ Parse --archived flag (search in archives)
+   └─ Parse session-id argument (optional)
+
+Step 1: Session Resolution
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ session-id provided + --archived → Search .workflow/archives/
+      ├─ session-id provided → Search .workflow/active/ first, then archives
+      └─ Not provided → Auto-detect from .workflow/active/
+
+Step 2: Validation
+   ├─ Check session directory exists (active or archived)
+   └─ Check for completed implementation (.summaries/IMPL-*.md exists)
+
+Step 3: Type Check
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ type=docs → Redirect to /workflow:tools:docs
+      └─ Other types → Continue to analysis
+
+Step 4: Model Analysis Phase
+   ├─ Load context (summaries, test results, changed files)
+   └─ Perform specialized review by type:
+      ├─ security → Security patterns + Gemini analysis
+      ├─ architecture → Qwen architecture analysis
+      ├─ quality → Gemini code quality analysis
+      └─ action-items → Requirements verification
+
+Step 5: Generate Report
+   └─ Output: REVIEW-{type}.md
+```
+
 ## Execution Template
 
 ```bash
 #!/bin/bash
 # Optional specialized review for completed implementation
 
-# Step 1: Session ID resolution
+# Step 1: Session ID resolution and location detection
 if [ -n "$SESSION_ARG" ]; then
     sessionId="$SESSION_ARG"
 else
     sessionId=$(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1 | xargs basename)
 fi
 
-# Step 2: Validation
-if [ ! -d ".workflow/active/${sessionId}" ]; then
-    echo "Session ${sessionId} not found"
+# Step 2: Resolve session path (active or archived)
+# Priority: --archived flag → active → archives
+if [ -n "$ARCHIVED_FLAG" ]; then
+    sessionPath=".workflow/archives/${sessionId}"
+elif [ -d ".workflow/active/${sessionId}" ]; then
+    sessionPath=".workflow/active/${sessionId}"
+elif [ -d ".workflow/archives/${sessionId}" ]; then
+    sessionPath=".workflow/archives/${sessionId}"
+    echo "Note: Session found in archives, running review on archived session"
+else
+    echo "Session ${sessionId} not found in active or archives"
     exit 1
 fi
 
 # Check for completed tasks
-if [ ! -d ".workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
+if [ ! -d "${sessionPath}/.summaries" ] || [ -z "$(find ${sessionPath}/.summaries/ -name "IMPL-*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
     echo "No completed implementation found. Complete implementation first"
     exit 1
 fi
@@ -79,14 +122,18 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 
 1. **Load Context**: Read completed task summaries and changed files
    ```bash
-   # Load implementation summaries
-   cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries/IMPL-*.md
+   # Load implementation summaries (iterate through .summaries/ directory)
+   for summary in ${sessionPath}/.summaries/*.md; do
+     cat "$summary"
+   done
 
    # Load test results (if available)
-   cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.summaries/TEST-FIX-*.md 2>/dev/null
+   for test_summary in ${sessionPath}/.summaries/TEST-FIX-*.md 2>/dev/null; do
+     cat "$test_summary"
+   done
 
    # Get changed files
-   git log --since="$(cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json | jq -r .created_at)" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
+   git log --since="$(cat ${sessionPath}/workflow-session.json | jq -r .created_at)" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u
    ```
 
 2. **Perform Specialized Review**: Based on `review_type`
@@ -99,54 +146,56 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
      ```
    - Use Gemini for security analysis:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/active/${sessionId} && gemini -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Security audit of completed implementation
      TASK: Review code for security vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, auth/authz issues
-     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../project-tech.json @../../project-guidelines.json
      EXPECTED: Security findings report with severity levels
      RULES: Focus on OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data validation, injection risks
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
      ```
 
    **Architecture Review** (`--type=architecture`):
    - Use Qwen for architecture analysis:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/active/${sessionId} && qwen -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Architecture compliance review
      TASK: Evaluate adherence to architectural patterns, identify technical debt, review design decisions
-     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../project-tech.json @../../project-guidelines.json
      EXPECTED: Architecture assessment with recommendations
      RULES: Check for patterns, separation of concerns, modularity, scalability
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool qwen --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
      ```
 
    **Quality Review** (`--type=quality`):
    - Use Gemini for code quality:
      ```bash
-     cd .workflow/active/${sessionId} && gemini -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Code quality and best practices review
      TASK: Assess code readability, maintainability, adherence to best practices
-     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
+     CONTEXT: @.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../project-tech.json @../../project-guidelines.json
      EXPECTED: Quality assessment with improvement suggestions
      RULES: Check for code smells, duplication, complexity, naming conventions
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
      ```
 
    **Action Items Review** (`--type=action-items`):
    - Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria met:
      ```bash
      # Load task requirements and acceptance criteria
-     find .workflow/active/${sessionId}/.task -name "IMPL-*.json" -exec jq -r '
-       "Task: " + .id + "\n" +
-       "Requirements: " + (.context.requirements | join(", ")) + "\n" +
-       "Acceptance: " + (.context.acceptance | join(", "))
-     ' {} \;
+     for task_file in ${sessionPath}/.task/*.json; do
+       cat "$task_file" | jq -r '
+         "Task: " + .id + "\n" +
+         "Requirements: " + (.context.requirements | join(", ")) + "\n" +
+         "Acceptance: " + (.context.acceptance | join(", "))
+       '
+     done
 
      # Check implementation summaries against requirements
-     cd .workflow/active/${sessionId} && gemini -p "
+     ccw cli -p "
      PURPOSE: Verify all requirements and acceptance criteria are met
      TASK: Cross-check implementation summaries against original requirements
-     CONTEXT: @.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../CLAUDE.md
+     CONTEXT: @.task/IMPL-*.json,.summaries/IMPL-*.md,../.. @../../project-tech.json @../../project-guidelines.json
      EXPECTED:
      - Requirements coverage matrix
      - Acceptance criteria verification
@@ -157,7 +206,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
      - Verify all acceptance criteria are met
      - Flag any incomplete or missing action items
      - Assess deployment readiness
-     " --approval-mode yolo
+     " --tool gemini --mode write --cd ${sessionPath}
      ```
 
 
@@ -195,7 +244,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 4. **Output Files**:
    ```bash
    # Save review report
-   Write(.workflow/active/${sessionId}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md)
+   Write(${sessionPath}/REVIEW-${review_type}.md)
 
    # Update session metadata
    # (optional) Update workflow-session.json with review status
@@ -222,6 +271,12 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 # Architecture review for specific session
 /workflow:review --type=architecture WFS-payment-integration
 
+# Review an archived session (auto-detects if not in active)
+/workflow:review --type=security WFS-old-feature
+
+# Explicitly review archived session
+/workflow:review --archived --type=quality WFS-completed-feature
+
 # Documentation review
 /workflow:review --type=docs
 ```
@@ -231,6 +286,7 @@ After bash validation, the model takes control to:
 - **Simple Validation**: Check session exists and has completed tasks
 - **No Complex Orchestration**: Direct analysis, no multi-phase pipeline
 - **Specialized Reviews**: Different prompts and tools for different review types
+- **Archived Session Support**: Review archived sessions with `--archived` flag or auto-detection
 - **MCP Integration**: Fast code search for security and architecture patterns
 - **CLI Tool Integration**: Gemini for analysis, Qwen for architecture
 - **Structured Output**: Markdown reports with severity levels and action items
@@ -256,3 +312,11 @@ Optional Review (when needed):
 - Regular development (tests are sufficient)
 - Simple bug fixes (test-fix-agent handles it)
 - Minor changes (update-memory-related is enough)
+
+## Post-Review Action
+
+After review completion, prompt user:
+```
+Review complete. Would you like to complete and archive this session?
+→ Run /workflow:session:complete to archive with lessons learned
+```

.claude/commands/workflow/session/complete.md

@@ -8,483 +8,146 @@ examples:
 
 # Complete Workflow Session (/workflow:session:complete)
 
-## Overview
-Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, analyze it for lessons learned, move it to the archive directory, and remove the active flag marker.
+Mark the currently active workflow session as complete, archive it, and update manifests.
 
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:session:complete           # Complete current active session
-/workflow:session:complete --detailed # Show detailed completion summary
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Phase 1: Pre-Archival Preparation (Transactional Setup)
-
-**Purpose**: Find active session, create archiving marker to prevent concurrent operations. Session remains in active location for agent processing.
-
-#### Step 1.1: Find Active Session and Get Name
-```bash
-# Find active session directory
-bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1)
-
-# Extract session name from directory path
-bash(basename .workflow/active/WFS-session-name)
-```
-**Output**: Session name `WFS-session-name`
-
-#### Step 1.2: Check for Existing Archiving Marker (Resume Detection)
-```bash
-# Check if session is already being archived
-bash(test -f .workflow/active/WFS-session-name/.archiving && echo "RESUMING" || echo "NEW")
-```
-
-**If RESUMING**:
-- Previous archival attempt was interrupted
-- Skip to Phase 2 to resume agent analysis
-
-**If NEW**:
-- Continue to Step 1.3
-
-#### Step 1.3: Create Archiving Marker
-```bash
-# Mark session as "archiving in progress"
-bash(touch .workflow/active/WFS-session-name/.archiving)
-```
-**Purpose**:
-- Prevents concurrent operations on this session
-- Enables recovery if archival fails
-- Session remains in `.workflow/active/` for agent analysis
-
-**Result**: Session still at `.workflow/active/WFS-session-name/` with `.archiving` marker
-
-### Phase 2: Agent Analysis (In-Place Processing)
-
-**Purpose**: Agent analyzes session WHILE STILL IN ACTIVE LOCATION. Generates metadata but does NOT move files or update manifest.
-
-#### Agent Invocation
-
-Invoke `universal-executor` agent to analyze session and prepare archive metadata.
-
-**Agent Task**:
-```
-Task(
-  subagent_type="universal-executor",
-  description="Analyze session for archival",
-  prompt=`
-Analyze workflow session for archival preparation. Session is STILL in active location.
-
-## Context
-- Session: .workflow/active/WFS-session-name/
-- Status: Marked as archiving (.archiving marker present)
-- Location: Active sessions directory (NOT archived yet)
-
-## Tasks
-
-1. **Extract session data** from workflow-session.json
-   - session_id, description/topic, started_at, completed_at, status
-   - If status != "completed", update it with timestamp
-
-2. **Count files**: tasks (.task/*.json) and summaries (.summaries/*.md)
-
-3. **Generate lessons**: Use gemini with ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/archive/analysis-simple.txt
-   - Return: {successes, challenges, watch_patterns}
-
-4. **Build archive entry**:
-   - Calculate: duration_hours, success_rate, tags (3-5 keywords)
-   - Construct complete JSON with session_id, description, archived_at, metrics, tags, lessons
-   - Include archive_path: ".workflow/archives/WFS-session-name" (future location)
-
-5. **Extract feature metadata** (for Phase 4):
-   - Parse IMPL_PLAN.md for title (first # heading)
-   - Extract description (first paragraph, max 200 chars)
-   - Generate feature tags (3-5 keywords from content)
-
-6. **Return result**: Complete metadata package for atomic commit
-   {
-     "status": "success",
-     "session_id": "WFS-session-name",
-     "archive_entry": {
-       "session_id": "...",
-       "description": "...",
-       "archived_at": "...",
-       "archive_path": ".workflow/archives/WFS-session-name",
-       "metrics": {...},
-       "tags": [...],
-       "lessons": {...}
-     },
-     "feature_metadata": {
-       "title": "...",
-       "description": "...",
-       "tags": [...]
-     }
-   }
-
-## Important Constraints
-- DO NOT move or delete any files
-- DO NOT update manifest.json yet
-- Session remains in .workflow/active/ during analysis
-- Return complete metadata package for orchestrator to commit atomically
-
-## Error Handling
-- On failure: return {"status": "error", "task": "...", "message": "..."}
-- Do NOT modify any files on error
-  `
-)
-```
-
-**Expected Output**:
-- Agent returns complete metadata package
-- Session remains in `.workflow/active/` with `.archiving` marker
-- No files moved or manifests updated yet
-
-### Phase 3: Atomic Commit (Transactional File Operations)
-
-**Purpose**: Atomically commit all changes. Only execute if Phase 2 succeeds.
-
-#### Step 3.1: Create Archive Directory
-```bash
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow/archives/)
-```
-
-#### Step 3.2: Move Session to Archive
-```bash
-bash(mv .workflow/active/WFS-session-name .workflow/archives/WFS-session-name)
-```
-**Result**: Session now at `.workflow/archives/WFS-session-name/`
-
-#### Step 3.3: Update Manifest
-```bash
-# Read current manifest (or create empty array if not exists)
-bash(test -f .workflow/archives/manifest.json && cat .workflow/archives/manifest.json || echo "[]")
-```
-
-**JSON Update Logic**:
-```javascript
-// Read agent result from Phase 2
-const agentResult = JSON.parse(agentOutput);
-const archiveEntry = agentResult.archive_entry;
-
-// Read existing manifest
-let manifest = [];
-try {
-  const manifestContent = Read('.workflow/archives/manifest.json');
-  manifest = JSON.parse(manifestContent);
-} catch {
-  manifest = []; // Initialize if not exists
-}
-
-// Append new entry
-manifest.push(archiveEntry);
-
-// Write back
-Write('.workflow/archives/manifest.json', JSON.stringify(manifest, null, 2));
-```
-
-#### Step 3.4: Remove Archiving Marker
-```bash
-bash(rm .workflow/archives/WFS-session-name/.archiving)
-```
-**Result**: Clean archived session without temporary markers
-
-**Output Confirmation**:
-```
-✓ Session "${sessionId}" archived successfully
-  Location: .workflow/archives/WFS-session-name/
-  Lessons: ${archiveEntry.lessons.successes.length} successes, ${archiveEntry.lessons.challenges.length} challenges
-  Manifest: Updated with ${manifest.length} total sessions
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Update Project Feature Registry
-
-**Purpose**: Record completed session as a project feature in `.workflow/project.json`.
-
-**Execution**: Uses feature metadata from Phase 2 agent result to update project registry.
-
-#### Step 4.1: Check Project State Exists
-```bash
-bash(test -f .workflow/project.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "SKIP")
-```
-
-**If SKIP**: Output warning and skip Phase 4
-```
-WARNING: No project.json found. Run /workflow:session:start to initialize.
-```
-
-#### Step 4.2: Extract Feature Information from Agent Result
-
-**Data Processing** (Uses Phase 2 agent output):
-```javascript
-// Extract feature metadata from agent result
-const agentResult = JSON.parse(agentOutput);
-const featureMeta = agentResult.feature_metadata;
-
-// Data already prepared by agent:
-const title = featureMeta.title;
-const description = featureMeta.description;
-const tags = featureMeta.tags;
-
-// Create feature ID (lowercase slug)
-const featureId = title.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 50);
-```
-
-#### Step 4.3: Update project.json
+## Pre-defined Commands
 
 ```bash
-# Read current project state
-bash(cat .workflow/project.json)
+# Phase 1: Find active session
+SESSION_PATH=$(find .workflow/active/ -maxdepth 1 -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1)
+SESSION_ID=$(basename "$SESSION_PATH")
+
+# Phase 3: Move to archive
+mkdir -p .workflow/archives/
+mv .workflow/active/$SESSION_ID .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID
+
+# Cleanup marker
+rm -f .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID/.archiving
 ```
 
-**JSON Update Logic**:
-```javascript
-// Read existing project.json (created by /workflow:init)
-// Note: overview field is managed by /workflow:init, not modified here
-const projectMeta = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/project.json'));
-const currentTimestamp = new Date().toISOString();
-const currentDate = currentTimestamp.split('T')[0]; // YYYY-MM-DD
+## Key Files to Read
 
-// Extract tags from IMPL_PLAN.md (simple keyword extraction)
-const tags = extractTags(planContent); // e.g., ["auth", "security"]
+**For manifest.json generation**, read ONLY these files:
 
-// Build feature object with complete metadata
-const newFeature = {
-  id: featureId,
-  title: title,
-  description: description,
-  status: "completed",
-  tags: tags,
-  timeline: {
-    created_at: currentTimestamp,
-    implemented_at: currentDate,
-    updated_at: currentTimestamp
-  },
-  traceability: {
-    session_id: sessionId,
-    archive_path: archivePath, // e.g., ".workflow/archives/WFS-auth-system"
-    commit_hash: getLatestCommitHash() || "" // Optional: git rev-parse HEAD
-  },
-  docs: [],      // Placeholder for future doc links
-  relations: []  // Placeholder for feature dependencies
-};
+| File | Extract |
+|------|---------|
+| `$SESSION_PATH/workflow-session.json` | session_id, description, started_at, status |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/IMPL_PLAN.md` | title (first # heading), description (first paragraph) |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/.tasks/*.json` | count files |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/.summaries/*.md` | count files |
+| `$SESSION_PATH/.review/dimensions/*.json` | count + findings summary (optional) |
 
-// Add new feature to array
-projectMeta.features.push(newFeature);
+## Execution Flow
 
-// Update statistics
-projectMeta.statistics.total_features = projectMeta.features.length;
-projectMeta.statistics.total_sessions += 1;
-projectMeta.statistics.last_updated = currentTimestamp;
+### Phase 1: Find Session (2 commands)
 
-// Write back
-Write('.workflow/project.json', JSON.stringify(projectMeta, null, 2));
+```bash
+# 1. Find and extract session
+SESSION_PATH=$(find .workflow/active/ -maxdepth 1 -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1)
+SESSION_ID=$(basename "$SESSION_PATH")
+
+# 2. Check/create archiving marker
+test -f "$SESSION_PATH/.archiving" && echo "RESUMING" || touch "$SESSION_PATH/.archiving"
 ```
 
-**Helper Functions**:
-```javascript
-// Extract tags from IMPL_PLAN.md content
-function extractTags(planContent) {
-  const tags = [];
+**Output**: `SESSION_ID` = e.g., `WFS-auth-feature`
 
-  // Look for common keywords
-  const keywords = {
-    'auth': /authentication|login|oauth|jwt/i,
-    'security': /security|encrypt|hash|token/i,
-    'api': /api|endpoint|rest|graphql/i,
-    'ui': /component|page|interface|frontend/i,
-    'database': /database|schema|migration|sql/i,
-    'test': /test|testing|spec|coverage/i
-  };
+### Phase 2: Generate Manifest Entry (Read-only)
 
-  for (const [tag, pattern] of Object.entries(keywords)) {
-    if (pattern.test(planContent)) {
-      tags.push(tag);
+Read the key files above, then build this structure:
+
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "<from workflow-session.json>",
+  "description": "<from workflow-session.json>",
+  "archived_at": "<current ISO timestamp>",
+  "archive_path": ".workflow/archives/<SESSION_ID>",
+  "metrics": {
+    "duration_hours": "<(completed_at - started_at) / 3600000>",
+    "tasks_completed": "<count .tasks/*.json>",
+    "summaries_generated": "<count .summaries/*.md>",
+    "review_metrics": {
+      "dimensions_analyzed": "<count .review/dimensions/*.json>",
+      "total_findings": "<sum from dimension JSONs>"
     }
-  }
-
-  return tags.slice(0, 5); // Max 5 tags
-}
-
-// Get latest git commit hash (optional)
-function getLatestCommitHash() {
-  try {
-    const result = Bash({
-      command: "git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null",
-      description: "Get latest commit hash"
-    });
-    return result.trim();
-  } catch {
-    return "";
+  },
+  "tags": ["<3-5 keywords from IMPL_PLAN.md>"],
+  "lessons": {
+    "successes": ["<key wins>"],
+    "challenges": ["<difficulties>"],
+    "watch_patterns": ["<patterns to monitor>"]
   }
 }
 ```
 
-#### Step 4.4: Output Confirmation
+**Lessons Generation**: Use gemini with `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/archive/analysis-simple.txt`
 
-```
-✓ Feature "${title}" added to project registry
-  ID: ${featureId}
-  Session: ${sessionId}
-  Location: .workflow/project.json
+### Phase 3: Atomic Commit (4 commands)
+
+```bash
+# 1. Create archive directory
+mkdir -p .workflow/archives/
+
+# 2. Move session
+mv .workflow/active/$SESSION_ID .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID
+
+# 3. Update manifest.json (Read → Append → Write)
+# Read: .workflow/archives/manifest.json (or [])
+# Append: archive_entry from Phase 2
+# Write: updated JSON
+
+# 4. Remove marker
+rm -f .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID/.archiving
 ```
 
-**Error Handling**:
-- If project.json malformed: Output error, skip update
-- If feature_metadata missing from agent result: Skip Phase 4
-- If extraction fails: Use minimal defaults
+**Output**:
+```
+✓ Session "$SESSION_ID" archived successfully
+  Location: .workflow/archives/$SESSION_ID/
+  Manifest: Updated with N total sessions
+```
 
-**Phase 4 Total Commands**: 1 bash read + JSON manipulation
+### Phase 4: Update project.json (Optional)
+
+**Skip if**: `.workflow/project.json` doesn't exist
+
+```bash
+# Check
+test -f .workflow/project.json || echo "SKIP"
+```
+
+**If exists**, add feature entry:
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "<slugified title>",
+  "title": "<from IMPL_PLAN.md>",
+  "status": "completed",
+  "tags": ["<from Phase 2>"],
+  "timeline": { "implemented_at": "<date>" },
+  "traceability": { "session_id": "<SESSION_ID>", "archive_path": "<path>" }
+}
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```
+✓ Feature added to project registry
+```
 
 ## Error Recovery
 
-### If Agent Fails (Phase 2)
+| Phase | Symptom | Recovery |
+|-------|---------|----------|
+| 1 | No active session | `No active session found` |
+| 2 | Analysis fails | Remove marker: `rm $SESSION_PATH/.archiving`, retry |
+| 3 | Move fails | Session safe in active/, fix issue, retry |
+| 3 | Manifest fails | Session in archives/, manually add entry, remove marker |
 
-**Symptoms**:
-- Agent returns `{"status": "error", ...}`
-- Agent crashes or times out
-- Analysis incomplete
+## Quick Reference
 
-**Recovery Steps**:
-```bash
-# Session still in .workflow/active/WFS-session-name
-# Remove archiving marker
-bash(rm .workflow/active/WFS-session-name/.archiving)
 ```
-
-**User Notification**:
+Phase 1: find session → create .archiving marker
+Phase 2: read key files → build manifest entry (no writes)
+Phase 3: mkdir → mv → update manifest.json → rm marker
+Phase 4: update project.json features array (optional)
 ```
-ERROR: Session archival failed during analysis phase
-Reason: [error message from agent]
-Session remains active in: .workflow/active/WFS-session-name
-
-Recovery:
-1. Fix any issues identified in error message
-2. Retry: /workflow:session:complete
-
-Session state: SAFE (no changes committed)
-```
-
-### If Move Fails (Phase 3)
-
-**Symptoms**:
-- `mv` command fails
-- Permission denied
-- Disk full
-
-**Recovery Steps**:
-```bash
-# Archiving marker still present
-# Session still in .workflow/active/ (move failed)
-# No manifest updated yet
-```
-
-**User Notification**:
-```
-ERROR: Session archival failed during move operation
-Reason: [mv error message]
-Session remains in: .workflow/active/WFS-session-name
-
-Recovery:
-1. Fix filesystem issues (permissions, disk space)
-2. Retry: /workflow:session:complete
-   - System will detect .archiving marker
-   - Will resume from Phase 2 (agent analysis)
-
-Session state: SAFE (analysis complete, ready to retry move)
-```
-
-### If Manifest Update Fails (Phase 3)
-
-**Symptoms**:
-- JSON parsing error
-- Write permission denied
-- Session moved but manifest not updated
-
-**Recovery Steps**:
-```bash
-# Session moved to .workflow/archives/WFS-session-name
-# Manifest NOT updated
-# Archiving marker still present in archived location
-```
-
-**User Notification**:
-```
-ERROR: Session archived but manifest update failed
-Reason: [error message]
-Session location: .workflow/archives/WFS-session-name
-
-Recovery:
-1. Fix manifest.json issues (syntax, permissions)
-2. Manual manifest update:
-   - Add archive entry from agent output
-   - Remove .archiving marker: rm .workflow/archives/WFS-session-name/.archiving
-
-Session state: PARTIALLY COMPLETE (session archived, manifest needs update)
-```
-
-## Workflow Execution Strategy
-
-### Transactional Four-Phase Approach
-
-**Phase 1: Pre-Archival Preparation** (Marker creation)
-- Find active session and extract name
-- Check for existing `.archiving` marker (resume detection)
-- Create `.archiving` marker if new
-- **No data processing** - just state tracking
-- **Total**: 2-3 bash commands (find + marker check/create)
-
-**Phase 2: Agent Analysis** (Read-only data processing)
-- Extract all session data from active location
-- Count tasks and summaries
-- Generate lessons learned analysis
-- Extract feature metadata from IMPL_PLAN.md
-- Build complete archive + feature metadata package
-- **No file modifications** - pure analysis
-- **Total**: 1 agent invocation
-
-**Phase 3: Atomic Commit** (Transactional file operations)
-- Create archive directory
-- Move session to archive location
-- Update manifest.json with archive entry
-- Remove `.archiving` marker
-- **All-or-nothing**: Either all succeed or session remains in safe state
-- **Total**: 4 bash commands + JSON manipulation
-
-**Phase 4: Project Registry Update** (Optional feature tracking)
-- Check project.json exists
-- Use feature metadata from Phase 2 agent result
-- Build feature object with complete traceability
-- Update project statistics
-- **Independent**: Can fail without affecting archival
-- **Total**: 1 bash read + JSON manipulation
-
-### Transactional Guarantees
-
-**State Consistency**:
-- Session NEVER in inconsistent state
-- `.archiving` marker enables safe resume
-- Agent failure leaves session in recoverable state
-- Move/manifest operations grouped in Phase 3
-
-**Failure Isolation**:
-- Phase 1 failure: No changes made
-- Phase 2 failure: Session still active, can retry
-- Phase 3 failure: Clear error state, manual recovery documented
-- Phase 4 failure: Does not affect archival success
-
-**Resume Capability**:
-- Detect interrupted archival via `.archiving` marker
-- Resume from Phase 2 (skip marker creation)
-- Idempotent operations (safe to retry)
-
-### Benefits Over Previous Design
-
-**Old Design Weakness**:
-- Move first → agent second
-- Agent failure → session moved but metadata incomplete
-- Inconsistent state requires manual cleanup
-
-**New Design Strengths**:
-- Agent first → move second
-- Agent failure → session still active, safe to retry
-- Transactional commit → all-or-nothing file operations
-- Marker-based state → resume capability

.claude/commands/workflow/session/solidify.md

@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
+---
+name: solidify
+description: Crystallize session learnings and user-defined constraints into permanent project guidelines
+argument-hint: "[--type <convention|constraint|learning>] [--category <category>] \"rule or insight\""
+examples:
+  - /workflow:session:solidify "Use functional components for all React code" --type convention
+  - /workflow:session:solidify "No direct DB access from controllers" --type constraint --category architecture
+  - /workflow:session:solidify "Cache invalidation requires event sourcing" --type learning --category architecture
+  - /workflow:session:solidify --interactive
+---
+
+# Session Solidify Command (/workflow:session:solidify)
+
+## Overview
+
+Crystallizes ephemeral session context (insights, decisions, constraints) into permanent project guidelines stored in `.workflow/project-guidelines.json`. This ensures valuable learnings persist across sessions and inform future planning.
+
+## Use Cases
+
+1. **During Session**: Capture important decisions as they're made
+2. **After Session**: Reflect on lessons learned before archiving
+3. **Proactive**: Add team conventions or architectural rules
+
+## Parameters
+
+| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
+|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
+| `rule` | string | ✅ (unless --interactive) | The rule, convention, or insight to solidify |
+| `--type` | enum | ❌ | Type: `convention`, `constraint`, `learning` (default: auto-detect) |
+| `--category` | string | ❌ | Category for organization (see categories below) |
+| `--interactive` | flag | ❌ | Launch guided wizard for adding rules |
+
+### Type Categories
+
+**convention** → Coding style preferences (goes to `conventions` section)
+- Subcategories: `coding_style`, `naming_patterns`, `file_structure`, `documentation`
+
+**constraint** → Hard rules that must not be violated (goes to `constraints` section)
+- Subcategories: `architecture`, `tech_stack`, `performance`, `security`
+
+**learning** → Session-specific insights (goes to `learnings` array)
+- Subcategories: `architecture`, `performance`, `security`, `testing`, `process`, `other`
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse: rule text (required unless --interactive)
+   ├─ Parse: --type (convention|constraint|learning)
+   ├─ Parse: --category (subcategory)
+   └─ Parse: --interactive (flag)
+
+Step 1: Ensure Guidelines File Exists
+   └─ If not exists → Create with empty structure
+
+Step 2: Auto-detect Type (if not specified)
+   └─ Analyze rule text for keywords
+
+Step 3: Validate and Format Entry
+   └─ Build entry object based on type
+
+Step 4: Update Guidelines File
+   └─ Add entry to appropriate section
+
+Step 5: Display Confirmation
+   └─ Show what was added and where
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Step 1: Ensure Guidelines File Exists
+
+```bash
+bash(test -f .workflow/project-guidelines.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND")
+```
+
+**If NOT_FOUND**, create scaffold:
+
+```javascript
+const scaffold = {
+  conventions: {
+    coding_style: [],
+    naming_patterns: [],
+    file_structure: [],
+    documentation: []
+  },
+  constraints: {
+    architecture: [],
+    tech_stack: [],
+    performance: [],
+    security: []
+  },
+  quality_rules: [],
+  learnings: [],
+  _metadata: {
+    created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+    version: "1.0.0"
+  }
+};
+
+Write('.workflow/project-guidelines.json', JSON.stringify(scaffold, null, 2));
+```
+
+### Step 2: Auto-detect Type (if not specified)
+
+```javascript
+function detectType(ruleText) {
+  const text = ruleText.toLowerCase();
+
+  // Constraint indicators
+  if (/\b(no|never|must not|forbidden|prohibited|always must)\b/.test(text)) {
+    return 'constraint';
+  }
+
+  // Learning indicators
+  if (/\b(learned|discovered|realized|found that|turns out)\b/.test(text)) {
+    return 'learning';
+  }
+
+  // Default to convention
+  return 'convention';
+}
+
+function detectCategory(ruleText, type) {
+  const text = ruleText.toLowerCase();
+
+  if (type === 'constraint' || type === 'learning') {
+    if (/\b(architecture|layer|module|dependency|circular)\b/.test(text)) return 'architecture';
+    if (/\b(security|auth|permission|sanitize|xss|sql)\b/.test(text)) return 'security';
+    if (/\b(performance|cache|lazy|async|sync|slow)\b/.test(text)) return 'performance';
+    if (/\b(test|coverage|mock|stub)\b/.test(text)) return 'testing';
+  }
+
+  if (type === 'convention') {
+    if (/\b(name|naming|prefix|suffix|camel|pascal)\b/.test(text)) return 'naming_patterns';
+    if (/\b(file|folder|directory|structure|organize)\b/.test(text)) return 'file_structure';
+    if (/\b(doc|comment|jsdoc|readme)\b/.test(text)) return 'documentation';
+    return 'coding_style';
+  }
+
+  return type === 'constraint' ? 'tech_stack' : 'other';
+}
+```
+
+### Step 3: Build Entry
+
+```javascript
+function buildEntry(rule, type, category, sessionId) {
+  if (type === 'learning') {
+    return {
+      date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],
+      session_id: sessionId || null,
+      insight: rule,
+      category: category,
+      context: null
+    };
+  }
+
+  // For conventions and constraints, just return the rule string
+  return rule;
+}
+```
+
+### Step 4: Update Guidelines File
+
+```javascript
+const guidelines = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/project-guidelines.json'));
+
+if (type === 'convention') {
+  if (!guidelines.conventions[category]) {
+    guidelines.conventions[category] = [];
+  }
+  if (!guidelines.conventions[category].includes(rule)) {
+    guidelines.conventions[category].push(rule);
+  }
+} else if (type === 'constraint') {
+  if (!guidelines.constraints[category]) {
+    guidelines.constraints[category] = [];
+  }
+  if (!guidelines.constraints[category].includes(rule)) {
+    guidelines.constraints[category].push(rule);
+  }
+} else if (type === 'learning') {
+  guidelines.learnings.push(buildEntry(rule, type, category, sessionId));
+}
+
+guidelines._metadata.updated_at = new Date().toISOString();
+guidelines._metadata.last_solidified_by = sessionId;
+
+Write('.workflow/project-guidelines.json', JSON.stringify(guidelines, null, 2));
+```
+
+### Step 5: Display Confirmation
+
+```
+✓ Guideline solidified
+
+Type: ${type}
+Category: ${category}
+Rule: "${rule}"
+
+Location: .workflow/project-guidelines.json → ${type}s.${category}
+
+Total ${type}s in ${category}: ${count}
+```
+
+## Interactive Mode
+
+When `--interactive` flag is provided:
+
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "What type of guideline are you adding?",
+      header: "Type",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Convention", description: "Coding style preference (e.g., use functional components)" },
+        { label: "Constraint", description: "Hard rule that must not be violated (e.g., no direct DB access)" },
+        { label: "Learning", description: "Insight from this session (e.g., cache invalidation needs events)" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+});
+
+// Follow-up based on type selection...
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+### Add a Convention
+```bash
+/workflow:session:solidify "Use async/await instead of callbacks" --type convention --category coding_style
+```
+
+Result in `project-guidelines.json`:
+```json
+{
+  "conventions": {
+    "coding_style": ["Use async/await instead of callbacks"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Add an Architectural Constraint
+```bash
+/workflow:session:solidify "No direct DB access from controllers" --type constraint --category architecture
+```
+
+Result:
+```json
+{
+  "constraints": {
+    "architecture": ["No direct DB access from controllers"]
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Capture a Session Learning
+```bash
+/workflow:session:solidify "Cache invalidation requires event sourcing for consistency" --type learning
+```
+
+Result:
+```json
+{
+  "learnings": [
+    {
+      "date": "2024-12-28",
+      "session_id": "WFS-auth-feature",
+      "insight": "Cache invalidation requires event sourcing for consistency",
+      "category": "architecture"
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Integration with Planning
+
+The `project-guidelines.json` is consumed by:
+
+1. **`/workflow:tools:context-gather`**: Loads guidelines into context-package.json
+2. **`/workflow:plan`**: Passes guidelines to task generation agent
+3. **`task-generate-agent`**: Includes guidelines as "CRITICAL CONSTRAINTS" in system prompt
+
+This ensures all future planning respects solidified rules without users needing to re-state them.
+
+## Error Handling
+
+- **Duplicate Rule**: Warn and skip if exact rule already exists
+- **Invalid Category**: Suggest valid categories for the type
+- **File Corruption**: Backup existing file before modification
+
+## Related Commands
+
+- `/workflow:session:start` - Start a session (may prompt for solidify at end)
+- `/workflow:session:complete` - Complete session (prompts for learnings to solidify)
+- `/workflow:init` - Creates project-guidelines.json scaffold if missing

.claude/commands/workflow/session/start.md

@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: start
 description: Discover existing sessions or start new workflow session with intelligent session management and conflict detection
-argument-hint: [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
+argument-hint: [--type <workflow|review|tdd|test|docs>] [--auto|--new] [optional: task description for new session]
 examples:
   - /workflow:session:start
   - /workflow:session:start --auto "implement OAuth2 authentication"
-  - /workflow:session:start --new "fix login bug"
+  - /workflow:session:start --type review "Code review for auth module"
+  - /workflow:session:start --type tdd --auto "implement user authentication"
+  - /workflow:session:start --type test --new "test payment flow"
 ---
 
 # Start Workflow Session (/workflow:session:start)
@@ -17,28 +19,48 @@ Manages workflow sessions with three operation modes: discovery (manual), auto (
 1. **Project-level initialization** (first-time only): Creates `.workflow/project.json` for feature registry
 2. **Session-level initialization** (always): Creates session directory structure
 
+## Session Types
+
+The `--type` parameter classifies sessions for CCW dashboard organization:
+
+| Type | Description | Default For |
+|------|-------------|-------------|
+| `workflow` | Standard implementation (default) | `/workflow:plan` |
+| `review` | Code review sessions | `/workflow:review-module-cycle` |
+| `tdd` | TDD-based development | `/workflow:tdd-plan` |
+| `test` | Test generation/fix sessions | `/workflow:test-fix-gen` |
+| `docs` | Documentation sessions | `/memory:docs` |
+
+**Validation**: If `--type` is provided with invalid value, return error:
+```
+ERROR: Invalid session type. Valid types: workflow, review, tdd, test, docs
+```
+
 ## Step 0: Initialize Project State (First-time Only)
 
-**Executed before all modes** - Ensures project-level state file exists by calling `/workflow:init`.
+**Executed before all modes** - Ensures project-level state files exist by calling `/workflow:init`.
 
 ### Check and Initialize
 ```bash
-# Check if project state exists
-bash(test -f .workflow/project.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND")
+# Check if project state exists (both files required)
+bash(test -f .workflow/project-tech.json && echo "TECH_EXISTS" || echo "TECH_NOT_FOUND")
+bash(test -f .workflow/project-guidelines.json && echo "GUIDELINES_EXISTS" || echo "GUIDELINES_NOT_FOUND")
 ```
 
-**If NOT_FOUND**, delegate to `/workflow:init`:
+**If either NOT_FOUND**, delegate to `/workflow:init`:
 ```javascript
 // Call workflow:init for intelligent project analysis
 SlashCommand({command: "/workflow:init"});
 
 // Wait for init completion
-// project.json will be created with comprehensive project overview
+// project-tech.json and project-guidelines.json will be created
 ```
 
 **Output**:
-- If EXISTS: `PROJECT_STATE: initialized`
-- If NOT_FOUND: Calls `/workflow:init` → creates `.workflow/project.json` with full project analysis
+- If BOTH_EXIST: `PROJECT_STATE: initialized`
+- If NOT_FOUND: Calls `/workflow:init` → creates:
+  - `.workflow/project-tech.json` with full technical analysis
+  - `.workflow/project-guidelines.json` with empty scaffold
 
 **Note**: `/workflow:init` uses cli-explore-agent to build comprehensive project understanding (technology stack, architecture, key components). This step runs once per project. Subsequent executions skip initialization.
 
@@ -86,8 +108,8 @@ bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.process)
 bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.task)
 bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/.summaries)
 
-# Create metadata
-bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-implement-oauth2-auth","project":"implement OAuth2 auth","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/workflow-session.json)
+# Create metadata (include type field, default to "workflow" if not specified)
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-implement-oauth2-auth","project":"implement OAuth2 auth","status":"planning","type":"workflow","created_at":"2024-12-04T08:00:00Z"}' > .workflow/active/WFS-implement-oauth2-auth/workflow-session.json)
 ```
 
 **Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-implement-oauth2-auth`
@@ -143,11 +165,16 @@ bash(mkdir -p .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/.summaries)
 
 ### Step 3: Create Metadata
 ```bash
-bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-fix-login-bug","project":"fix login bug","status":"planning"}' > .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/workflow-session.json)
+# Include type field from --type parameter (default: "workflow")
+bash(echo '{"session_id":"WFS-fix-login-bug","project":"fix login bug","status":"planning","type":"workflow","created_at":"2024-12-04T08:00:00Z"}' > .workflow/active/WFS-fix-login-bug/workflow-session.json)
 ```
 
 **Output**: `SESSION_ID: WFS-fix-login-bug`
 
+## Execution Guideline
+
+- **Non-interrupting**: When called from other commands, this command completes and returns control to the caller without interrupting subsequent tasks.
+
 ## Output Format Specification
 
 ### Success
@@ -168,25 +195,6 @@ DECISION: Reusing existing session
 SESSION_ID: WFS-promptmaster-platform
 ```
 
-## Command Integration
-
-### For /workflow:plan (Use Auto Mode)
-```bash
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --auto \"implement OAuth2 authentication\"")
-
-# Parse session ID from output
-grep "^SESSION_ID:" | awk '{print $2}'
-```
-
-### For Interactive Workflows (Use Discovery Mode)
-```bash
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start")
-```
-
-### For New Isolated Work (Use Force New Mode)
-```bash
-SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"experimental feature\"")
-```
 
 ## Session ID Format
 - Pattern: `WFS-[lowercase-slug]`

.claude/commands/workflow/status.md

@@ -1,328 +0,0 @@
----
-name: workflow:status
-description: Generate on-demand views for project overview and workflow tasks with optional task-id filtering for detailed view
-argument-hint: "[optional: --project|task-id|--validate|--dashboard]"
----
-
-# Workflow Status Command (/workflow:status)
-
-## Overview
-Generates on-demand views from project and session data. Supports multiple modes:
-1. **Project Overview** (`--project`): Shows completed features and project statistics
-2. **Workflow Tasks** (default): Shows current session task progress
-3. **HTML Dashboard** (`--dashboard`): Generates interactive HTML task board with active and archived sessions
-
-No synchronization needed - all views are calculated from current JSON state.
-
-## Usage
-```bash
-/workflow:status                    # Show current workflow session overview
-/workflow:status --project          # Show project-level feature registry
-/workflow:status impl-1             # Show specific task details
-/workflow:status --validate         # Validate workflow integrity
-/workflow:status --dashboard        # Generate HTML dashboard board
-```
-
-## Implementation Flow
-
-### Mode Selection
-
-**Check for --project flag**:
-- If `--project` flag present → Execute **Project Overview Mode**
-- Otherwise → Execute **Workflow Session Mode** (default)
-
-## Project Overview Mode
-
-### Step 1: Check Project State
-```bash
-bash(test -f .workflow/project.json && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND")
-```
-
-**If NOT_FOUND**:
-```
-No project state found.
-Run /workflow:session:start to initialize project.
-```
-
-### Step 2: Read Project Data
-```bash
-bash(cat .workflow/project.json)
-```
-
-### Step 3: Parse and Display
-
-**Data Processing**:
-```javascript
-const projectData = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/project.json'));
-const features = projectData.features || [];
-const stats = projectData.statistics || {};
-const overview = projectData.overview || null;
-
-// Sort features by implementation date (newest first)
-const sortedFeatures = features.sort((a, b) =>
-  new Date(b.implemented_at) - new Date(a.implemented_at)
-);
-```
-
-**Output Format** (with extended overview):
-```
-## Project: ${projectData.project_name}
-Initialized: ${projectData.initialized_at}
-
-${overview ? `
-### Overview
-${overview.description}
-
-**Technology Stack**:
-${overview.technology_stack.languages.map(l => `- ${l.name}${l.primary ? ' (primary)' : ''}: ${l.file_count} files`).join('\n')}
-Frameworks: ${overview.technology_stack.frameworks.join(', ')}
-
-**Architecture**:
-Style: ${overview.architecture.style}
-Patterns: ${overview.architecture.patterns.join(', ')}
-
-**Key Components** (${overview.key_components.length}):
-${overview.key_components.map(c => `- ${c.name} (${c.path})\n  ${c.description}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Metrics**:
-- Files: ${overview.metrics.total_files}
-- Lines of Code: ${overview.metrics.lines_of_code}
-- Complexity: ${overview.metrics.complexity}
-
----
-` : ''}
-
-### Completed Features (${stats.total_features})
-
-${sortedFeatures.map(f => `
-- ${f.title} (${f.timeline?.implemented_at || f.implemented_at})
-  ${f.description}
-  Tags: ${f.tags?.join(', ') || 'none'}
-  Session: ${f.traceability?.session_id || f.session_id}
-  Archive: ${f.traceability?.archive_path || 'unknown'}
-  ${f.traceability?.commit_hash ? `Commit: ${f.traceability.commit_hash}` : ''}
-`).join('\n')}
-
-### Project Statistics
-- Total Features: ${stats.total_features}
-- Total Sessions: ${stats.total_sessions}
-- Last Updated: ${stats.last_updated}
-
-### Quick Access
-- View session details: /workflow:status
-- Archive query: jq '.archives[] | select(.session_id == "SESSION_ID")' .workflow/archives/manifest.json
-- Documentation: .workflow/docs/${projectData.project_name}/
-
-### Query Commands
-# Find by tag
-cat .workflow/project.json | jq '.features[] | select(.tags[] == "auth")'
-
-# View archive
-cat ${feature.traceability.archive_path}/IMPL_PLAN.md
-
-# List all tags
-cat .workflow/project.json | jq -r '.features[].tags[]' | sort -u
-```
-
-**Empty State**:
-```
-## Project: ${projectData.project_name}
-Initialized: ${projectData.initialized_at}
-
-No features completed yet.
-
-Complete your first workflow session to add features:
-1. /workflow:plan "feature description"
-2. /workflow:execute
-3. /workflow:session:complete
-```
-
-### Step 4: Show Recent Sessions (Optional)
-
-```bash
-# List 5 most recent archived sessions
-bash(ls -1t .workflow/archives/WFS-* 2>/dev/null | head -5 | xargs -I {} basename {})
-```
-
-**Output**:
-```
-### Recent Sessions
-- WFS-auth-system (archived)
-- WFS-payment-flow (archived)
-- WFS-user-dashboard (archived)
-
-Use /workflow:session:complete to archive current session.
-```
-
-## Workflow Session Mode (Default)
-
-### Step 1: Find Active Session
-```bash
-find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1
-```
-
-### Step 2: Load Session Data
-```bash
-cat .workflow/active/WFS-session/workflow-session.json
-```
-
-### Step 3: Scan Task Files
-```bash
-find .workflow/active/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-### Step 4: Generate Task Status
-```bash
-cat .workflow/active/WFS-session/.task/impl-1.json | jq -r '.status'
-```
-
-### Step 5: Count Task Progress
-```bash
-find .workflow/active/WFS-session/.task/ -name "*.json" -type f | wc -l
-find .workflow/active/WFS-session/.summaries/ -name "*.md" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-```
-
-### Step 6: Display Overview
-```markdown
-# Workflow Overview
-**Session**: WFS-session-name
-**Progress**: 3/8 tasks completed
-
-## Active Tasks
-- [IN PROGRESS] impl-1: Current task in progress
-- [ ] impl-2: Next pending task
-
-## Completed Tasks
-- [COMPLETED] impl-0: Setup completed
-```
-
-## Dashboard Mode (HTML Board)
-
-### Step 1: Check for --dashboard flag
-```bash
-# If --dashboard flag present → Execute Dashboard Mode
-```
-
-### Step 2: Collect Workflow Data
-
-**Collect Active Sessions**:
-```bash
-# Find all active sessions
-find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null
-
-# For each active session, read metadata and tasks
-for session in $(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null); do
-  cat "$session/workflow-session.json"
-  find "$session/.task/" -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null
-done
-```
-
-**Collect Archived Sessions**:
-```bash
-# Find all archived sessions
-find .workflow/archives/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null
-
-# Read manifest if exists
-cat .workflow/archives/manifest.json 2>/dev/null
-
-# For each archived session, read metadata
-for archive in $(find .workflow/archives/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null); do
-  cat "$archive/workflow-session.json" 2>/dev/null
-  # Count completed tasks
-  find "$archive/.task/" -name "*.json" -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-done
-```
-
-### Step 3: Process and Structure Data
-
-**Build data structure for dashboard**:
-```javascript
-const dashboardData = {
-  activeSessions: [],
-  archivedSessions: [],
-  generatedAt: new Date().toISOString()
-};
-
-// Process active sessions
-for each active_session in active_sessions:
-  const sessionData = JSON.parse(Read(active_session/workflow-session.json));
-  const tasks = [];
-
-  // Load all tasks for this session
-  for each task_file in find(active_session/.task/*.json):
-    const taskData = JSON.parse(Read(task_file));
-    tasks.push({
-      task_id: taskData.task_id,
-      title: taskData.title,
-      status: taskData.status,
-      type: taskData.type
-    });
-
-  dashboardData.activeSessions.push({
-    session_id: sessionData.session_id,
-    project: sessionData.project,
-    status: sessionData.status,
-    created_at: sessionData.created_at || sessionData.initialized_at,
-    tasks: tasks
-  });
-
-// Process archived sessions
-for each archived_session in archived_sessions:
-  const sessionData = JSON.parse(Read(archived_session/workflow-session.json));
-  const taskCount = bash(find archived_session/.task/*.json | wc -l);
-
-  dashboardData.archivedSessions.push({
-    session_id: sessionData.session_id,
-    project: sessionData.project,
-    archived_at: sessionData.completed_at || sessionData.archived_at,
-    taskCount: parseInt(taskCount),
-    archive_path: archived_session
-  });
-```
-
-### Step 4: Generate HTML from Template
-
-**Load template and inject data**:
-```javascript
-// Read the HTML template
-const template = Read("~/.claude/templates/workflow-dashboard.html");
-
-// Prepare data for injection
-const dataJson = JSON.stringify(dashboardData, null, 2);
-
-// Replace placeholder with actual data
-const htmlContent = template.replace('{{WORKFLOW_DATA}}', dataJson);
-
-// Ensure .workflow directory exists
-bash(mkdir -p .workflow);
-```
-
-### Step 5: Write HTML File
-
-```bash
-# Write the generated HTML to .workflow/dashboard.html
-Write({
-  file_path: ".workflow/dashboard.html",
-  content: htmlContent
-})
-```
-
-### Step 6: Display Success Message
-
-```markdown
-Dashboard generated successfully!
-
-Location: .workflow/dashboard.html
-
-Open in browser:
-  file://$(pwd)/.workflow/dashboard.html
-
-Features:
-- 📊 Active sessions overview
-- 📦 Archived sessions history
-- 🔍 Search and filter
-- 📈 Progress tracking
-- 🎨 Dark/light theme
-
-Refresh data: Re-run /workflow:status --dashboard
-```

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-plan.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: tdd-plan
 description: TDD workflow planning with Red-Green-Refactor task chain generation, test-first development structure, and cycle tracking
-argument-hint: "[--cli-execute] \"feature description\"|file.md"
+argument-hint: "\"feature description\"|file.md"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -9,15 +9,13 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Coordinator Role
 
-**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Execute 6 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation with Red-Green-Refactor task generation.
+**This command is a pure orchestrator**: Executes 6 slash commands in sequence, parse outputs, pass context, and ensure complete TDD workflow creation with Red-Green-Refactor task generation.
 
-**Execution Modes**:
-- **Agent Mode** (default): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` (autonomous agent-driven)
-- **CLI Mode** (`--cli-execute`): Use `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --cli-execute` (Gemini/Qwen)
+**CLI Tool Selection**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description. Include "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen" in your request for CLI execution.
 
 **Task Attachment Model**:
-- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
-- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- SlashCommand execute **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When executing a sub-command (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
 - Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
 - After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
 - This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
@@ -30,19 +28,24 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 
 ## Core Rules
 
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is Phase 1 execution
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite initialization, second action is execute Phase 1
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data for next phase
 4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
 5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 6. **TDD Context**: All descriptions include "TDD:" prefix
-7. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+7. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
 8. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
 ## 6-Phase Execution (with Conflict Resolution)
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
-**Command**: `/workflow:session:start --auto "TDD: [structured-description]"`
+
+**Step 1.1: Execute** - Session discovery and initialization
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type tdd --auto \"TDD: [structured-description]\"")
+```
 
 **TDD Structured Format**:
 ```
@@ -62,7 +65,12 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 ---
 
 ### Phase 2: Context Gathering
-**Command**: `/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] "TDD: [structured-description]"`
+
+**Step 2.1: Execute** - Context gathering and analysis
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [sessionId] \"TDD: [structured-description]\"")
+```
 
 **Use Same Structured Description**: Pass the same structured format from Phase 1
 
@@ -83,7 +91,12 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 ---
 
 ### Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis
-**Command**: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]`
+
+**Step 3.1: Execute** - Test coverage analysis and framework detection
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [sessionId]")
+```
 
 **Purpose**: Analyze existing codebase for:
 - Existing test patterns and conventions
@@ -93,28 +106,25 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 
 **Parse**: Extract testContextPath (`.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/test-context-package.json`)
 
-**Benefits**:
-- Makes TDD aware of existing environment
-- Identifies reusable test patterns
-- Prevents duplicate test creation
-- Enables integration with existing tests
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather invoked, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather executed, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
+
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.1: Detect test framework and conventions (test-context-gather)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting test framework"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.2: Analyze existing test coverage (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test coverage"},
-  {"content": "Phase 3.3: Identify coverage gaps (test-context-gather)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying coverage gaps"},
-  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "  → Detect test framework and conventions", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting test framework"},
+  {"content": "  → Analyze existing test coverage", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test coverage"},
+  {"content": "  → Identify coverage gaps", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying coverage gaps"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
 
@@ -123,11 +133,11 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -141,7 +151,11 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 
 **Trigger**: Only execute when context-package.json indicates conflict_risk is "medium" or "high"
 
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+**Step 4.1: Execute** - Conflict detection and resolution
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution --session [sessionId] --context [contextPath]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - sessionId from Phase 1
@@ -150,32 +164,33 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 
 **Parse Output**:
 - Extract: Execution status (success/skipped/failed)
-- Verify: CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file path (if executed)
+- Verify: conflict-resolution.json file path (if executed)
 
 **Validation**:
-- File `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md` exists (if executed)
+- File `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.process/conflict-resolution.json` exists (if executed)
 
 **Skip Behavior**:
 - If conflict_risk is "none" or "low", skip directly to Phase 5
 - Display: "No significant conflicts detected, proceeding to TDD task generation"
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: If conflict_risk ≥ medium, INSERT 3 conflict-resolution tasks when executed -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached, if conflict_risk ≥ medium)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 4.1: Detect conflicts with CLI analysis (conflict-resolution)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
-  {"content": "Phase 4.2: Present conflicts to user (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
-  {"content": "Phase 4.3: Apply resolution strategies (conflict-resolution)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
-  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict Resolution", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing conflict resolution"},
+  {"content": "  → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Detecting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Present conflicts to user", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Presenting conflicts"},
+  {"content": "  → Apply resolution strategies", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Applying resolution strategies"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** conflict-resolution's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 4.1-4.3** sequentially
 
@@ -184,12 +199,12 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute conflict resolution", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing conflict resolution"},
-  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Conflict Resolution", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing conflict resolution"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -200,7 +215,13 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 **Memory State Check**:
 - Evaluate current context window usage and memory state
 - If memory usage is high (>110K tokens or approaching context limits):
-  - **Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/compact")`
+
+  **Step 4.5: Execute** - Memory compaction
+
+  ```javascript
+  SlashCommand(command="/compact")
+  ```
+
   - This optimizes memory before proceeding to Phase 5
 - Memory compaction is particularly important after analysis phase which may generate extensive documentation
 - Ensures optimal performance and prevents context overflow
@@ -208,9 +229,14 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 ---
 
 ### Phase 5: TDD Task Generation
-**Command**:
-- Agent Mode (default): `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]`
-- CLI Mode (`--cli-execute`): `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId] --cli-execute`
+
+**Step 5.1: Execute** - TDD task generation via action-planning-agent
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session [sessionId]")
+```
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description.
 
 **Parse**: Extract feature count, task count (not chain count - tasks now contain internal TDD cycles)
 
@@ -225,22 +251,23 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 - IMPL_PLAN.md contains workflow_type: "tdd" in frontmatter
 - Task count ≤10 (compliance with task limit)
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-tdd invoked, INSERT 3 task-generate-tdd tasks -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: When task-generate-tdd executed, INSERT 3 task-generate-tdd tasks -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5.1: Discovery - analyze TDD requirements (task-generate-tdd)", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing TDD requirements"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5.2: Planning - design Red-Green-Refactor cycles (task-generate-tdd)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Designing TDD cycles"},
-  {"content": "Phase 5.3: Output - generate IMPL tasks with internal TDD phases (task-generate-tdd)", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating TDD tasks"},
-  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "  → Discovery - analyze TDD requirements", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing TDD requirements"},
+  {"content": "  → Planning - design Red-Green-Refactor cycles", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Designing TDD cycles"},
+  {"content": "  → Output - generate IMPL tasks with internal TDD phases", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating TDD tasks"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** task-generate-tdd's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks. Each generated IMPL task will contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycle.
+**Note**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** task-generate-tdd's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks. Each generated IMPL task will contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycle.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 5.1-5.3** sequentially
 
@@ -249,11 +276,11 @@ TEST_FOCUS: [Test scenarios]
 **TodoWrite Update (Phase 5 completed - tasks collapsed)**:
 ```json
 [
-  {"content": "Execute session discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
-  {"content": "Execute context gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
-  {"content": "Execute test coverage analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
-  {"content": "Execute TDD task generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
-  {"content": "Validate TDD structure", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Coverage Analysis", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing test coverage analysis"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: TDD Task Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing TDD task generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 6: TDD Structure Validation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Validating TDD structure"}
 ]
 ```
 
@@ -320,7 +347,7 @@ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task
 
 ### Key Principles
 
-1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand executed):
    - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
    - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 3.1, 3.2, 3.3)
    - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
@@ -337,7 +364,7 @@ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task
    - No user intervention required between phases
    - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
 
-**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins (conditional Phase 4 if conflict_risk ≥ medium) → Repeat until all phases complete.
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase executed (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins (conditional Phase 4 if conflict_risk ≥ medium) → Repeat until all phases complete.
 
 ### TDD-Specific Features
 
@@ -345,12 +372,7 @@ Quality Gate: Consider running /workflow:action-plan-verify to validate TDD task
 - **Phase 5**: Generated IMPL tasks contain internal Red-Green-Refactor cycles
 - **Conditional Phase 4**: Conflict resolution only if conflict_risk ≥ medium
 
-### Benefits
 
-- ✓ Real-time visibility into TDD workflow execution
-- ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach → execute → collapse
-- ✓ Test-aware planning with coverage analysis
-- ✓ Self-contained TDD cycles within each IMPL task
 
 **Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 3, 4, 5) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
 
@@ -380,7 +402,7 @@ TDD Workflow Orchestrator
 │     ├─ Phase 4.1: Detect conflicts with CLI
 │     ├─ Phase 4.2: Present conflicts to user
 │     └─ Phase 4.3: Apply resolution strategies
-│     └─ Returns: CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md              ← COLLAPSED
+│     └─ Returns: conflict-resolution.json            ← COLLAPSED
 │  ELSE:
 │  └─ Skip to Phase 5
 │
@@ -428,8 +450,7 @@ Convert user input to TDD-structured format:
 - `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 3: Analyze existing test patterns and coverage
 - `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 4: Detect and resolve conflicts (auto-triggered if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
 - `/compact` - Phase 4: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
-- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` - Phase 5: Generate TDD tasks with agent-driven approach (default, autonomous)
-- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --cli-execute` - Phase 5: Generate TDD tasks with CLI tools (Gemini/Qwen, when `--cli-execute` flag used)
+- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd` - Phase 5: Generate TDD tasks (CLI tool usage determined semantically)
 
 **Follow-up Commands**:
 - `/workflow:action-plan-verify` - Recommended: Verify TDD plan quality and structure before execution

.claude/commands/workflow/tdd-verify.md

@@ -18,6 +18,39 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(gemini:*)
 - Validate TDD cycle execution
 - Generate compliance report
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Decision (session argument):
+      ├─ session-id provided → Use provided session
+      └─ No session-id → Auto-detect active session
+
+Phase 1: Session Discovery
+   ├─ Validate session directory exists
+   └─ TodoWrite: Mark phase 1 completed
+
+Phase 2: Task Chain Validation
+   ├─ Load all task JSONs from .task/
+   ├─ Extract task IDs and group by feature
+   ├─ Validate TDD structure:
+   │  ├─ TEST-N.M → IMPL-N.M → REFACTOR-N.M chain
+   │  ├─ Dependency verification
+   │  └─ Meta field validation (tdd_phase, agent)
+   └─ TodoWrite: Mark phase 2 completed
+
+Phase 3: Test Execution Analysis
+   └─ /workflow:tools:tdd-coverage-analysis
+      ├─ Coverage metrics extraction
+      ├─ TDD cycle verification
+      └─ Compliance score calculation
+
+Phase 4: Compliance Report Generation
+   ├─ Gemini analysis for comprehensive report
+   ├─ Generate TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+   └─ Return summary to user
+```
+
 ## 4-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Session Discovery
@@ -44,18 +77,32 @@ find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d | head -1 | sed 's/.*\///'
 
 ```bash
 # Load all task JSONs
-find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json'
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file"
+done
 
 # Extract task IDs
-find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.id' {} \;
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.id'
+done
 
-# Check dependencies
-find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name 'IMPL-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' {} \;
-find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name 'REFACTOR-*.json' -exec jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?' {} \;
+# Check dependencies - read tasks and filter for IMPL/REFACTOR
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/IMPL-*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?'
+done
+
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/REFACTOR-*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.context.depends_on[]?'
+done
 
 # Check meta fields
-find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.tdd_phase' {} \;
-find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent' {} \;
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.meta.tdd_phase'
+done
+
+for task_file in .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json; do
+  cat "$task_file" | jq -r '.meta.agent'
+done
 ```
 
 **Validation**:
@@ -94,7 +141,7 @@ find .workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/ -name '*.json' -exec jq -r '.meta.agent
 **Gemini analysis for comprehensive TDD compliance report**
 
 ```bash
-cd project-root && gemini -p "
+ccw cli -p "
 PURPOSE: Generate TDD compliance report
 TASK: Analyze TDD workflow execution and generate quality report
 CONTEXT: @{.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.task/*.json,.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.summaries/*,.workflow/active/{sessionId}/.process/tdd-cycle-report.md}
@@ -106,7 +153,7 @@ EXPECTED:
 - Red-Green-Refactor cycle validation
 - Best practices adherence assessment
 RULES: Focus on TDD best practices and workflow adherence. Be specific about violations and improvements.
-" > .workflow/active/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
+" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd project-root > .workflow/active/{sessionId}/TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md
 ```
 
 **Output**: TDD_COMPLIANCE_REPORT.md

.claude/commands/workflow/test-fix-gen.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: test-fix-gen
 description: Create test-fix workflow session from session ID, description, or file path with test strategy generation and task planning
-argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] (source-session-id | \"feature description\" | /path/to/file.md)"
+argument-hint: "(source-session-id | \"feature description\" | /path/to/file.md)"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ fi
 - **Session Isolation**: Creates independent `WFS-test-[slug]` session
 - **Context-First**: Gathers implementation context via appropriate method
 - **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` tasks with `meta.type: "test-fix"`
-- **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` for automation
+- **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description
 - **Automatic Detection**: Input pattern determines execution mode
 
 ### Coordinator Role
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 - **All execution delegated to `/workflow:test-cycle-execute`**
 
 **Task Attachment Model**:
-- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
-- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- SlashCommand execute **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When executing a sub-command (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
 - Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
 - After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
 - This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
@@ -79,16 +79,14 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 
 ```bash
 # Basic syntax
-/workflow:test-fix-gen [FLAGS] <INPUT>
-
-# Flags (optional)
---use-codex        # Enable Codex automated fixes in IMPL-002
---cli-execute      # Enable CLI execution in IMPL-001
+/workflow:test-fix-gen <INPUT>
 
 # Input
 <INPUT>            # Session ID, description, or file path
 ```
 
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from the task description. To request CLI execution, include it in your description (e.g., "use Codex for automated fixes").
+
 ### Usage Examples
 
 #### Session Mode
@@ -96,11 +94,8 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 # Test validation for completed implementation
 /workflow:test-fix-gen WFS-user-auth-v2
 
-# With automated fixes
-/workflow:test-fix-gen --use-codex WFS-api-endpoints
-
-# With CLI execution
-/workflow:test-fix-gen --cli-execute --use-codex WFS-payment-flow
+# With semantic CLI request
+/workflow:test-fix-gen WFS-api-endpoints  # Add "use Codex" in description for automated fixes
 ```
 
 #### Prompt Mode - Text Description
@@ -108,17 +103,14 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 # Generate tests from feature description
 /workflow:test-fix-gen "Test the user authentication API endpoints in src/auth/api.ts"
 
-# With automated fixes
-/workflow:test-fix-gen --use-codex "Test user registration and login flows"
+# With CLI execution (semantic)
+/workflow:test-fix-gen "Test user registration and login flows, use Codex for automated fixes"
 ```
 
 #### Prompt Mode - File Reference
 ```bash
 # Generate tests from requirements file
 /workflow:test-fix-gen ./docs/api-requirements.md
-
-# With flags
-/workflow:test-fix-gen --use-codex --cli-execute ./specs/feature.md
 ```
 
 ### Mode Comparison
@@ -136,32 +128,50 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 
 ### Core Execution Rules
 
-1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite, second is Phase 1 session creation
+1. **Start Immediately**: First action is TodoWrite, second is execute Phase 1 session creation
 2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files before Phase 1
 3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase for next phase
 4. **Sequential Execution**: Each phase depends on previous phase's output
 5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return until Phase 5 completes
 6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 7. **Automatic Detection**: Mode auto-detected from input pattern
-8. **Parse Flags**: Extract `--use-codex` and `--cli-execute` flags for Phase 4
-9. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+8. **Semantic CLI Detection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description for Phase 4
+9. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand execute **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
 10. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
 ### 5-Phase Execution
 
 #### Phase 1: Create Test Session
 
-**Command**:
-- **Session Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]\"")`
-- **Prompt Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:session:start --new \"Test generation for: [description]\"")`
+**Step 1.0: Load Source Session Intent (Session Mode Only)** - Preserve user's original task description for semantic CLI selection
+
+```javascript
+// Session Mode: Read source session metadata to get original task description
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/workflow-session.json")
+// OR if context-package exists:
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/.process/context-package.json")
+
+// Extract: metadata.task_description or project/description field
+// This preserves user's CLI tool preferences (e.g., "use Codex for fixes")
+```
+
+**Step 1.1: Execute** - Create test workflow session with preserved intent
+
+```javascript
+// Session Mode - Include original task description to enable semantic CLI selection
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type test --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]: [originalTaskDescription]\"")
+
+// Prompt Mode - User's description already contains their intent
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --type test --new \"Test generation for: [description]\"")
+```
 
 **Input**: User argument (session ID, description, or file path)
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Creates new session: `WFS-test-[slug]`
-- Writes `workflow-session.json` metadata:
-  - **Session Mode**: Includes `workflow_type: "test_session"`, `source_session_id: "[sourceId]"`
-  - **Prompt Mode**: Includes `workflow_type: "test_session"` only
+- Writes `workflow-session.json` metadata with `type: "test"`
+  - **Session Mode**: Additionally includes `source_session_id: "[sourceId]"`, description with original user intent
+  - **Prompt Mode**: Uses user's description (already contains intent)
 - Returns new session ID
 
 **Parse Output**:
@@ -177,9 +187,15 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 
 #### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
 
-**Command**:
-- **Session Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
-- **Prompt Mode**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [testSessionId] \"[task_description]\"")`
+**Step 2.1: Execute** - Gather test context via appropriate method
+
+```javascript
+// Session Mode
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")
+
+// Prompt Mode
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:context-gather --session [testSessionId] \"[task_description]\"")
+```
 
 **Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1
 
@@ -208,7 +224,11 @@ This command is a **pure planning coordinator**:
 
 #### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
 
-**Command**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [contextPath]")`
+**Step 3.1: Execute** - Generate test requirements using Gemini
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [contextPath]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
@@ -264,12 +284,16 @@ For each targeted file/function, Gemini MUST generate:
 
 #### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
 
-**Command**: `SlashCommand("/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session [testSessionId]")`
+**Step 4.1: Execute** - Generate test task JSONs
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session [testSessionId]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
-- `--use-codex` flag (if present) - Controls IMPL-002 fix mode
-- `--cli-execute` flag (if present) - Controls IMPL-001 generation mode
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description.
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3 (multi-layered test plan)
@@ -343,26 +367,56 @@ CRITICAL - Next Steps:
 
 **Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for test-fix-gen workflow with dual-mode support (Session Mode and Prompt Mode).
 
+#### Initial TodoWrite Structure
+
+```json
+[
+  {"content": "Phase 1: Create Test Session", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+  {"content": "Phase 2: Gather Test Context", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Gathering test context"},
+  {"content": "Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test generation"},
+  {"content": "Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+  {"content": "Phase 5: Return Summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing"}
+]
+```
+
 #### Key Principles
 
-1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand executed):
    - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
-   - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` (Session Mode) or `/workflow:tools:context-gather` (Prompt Mode) attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
-   - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
-   - Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
+   - Example - Phase 2 with sub-tasks:
+   ```json
+   [
+     {"content": "Phase 1: Create Test Session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+     {"content": "Phase 2: Gather Test Context", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Gathering test context"},
+     {"content": "  → Load context and analyze coverage", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Loading context"},
+     {"content": "  → Detect test framework and conventions", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Detecting framework"},
+     {"content": "  → Generate context package", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating context"},
+     {"content": "Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing test generation"},
+     {"content": "Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+     {"content": "Phase 5: Return Summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing"}
+   ]
+   ```
 
 2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
    - Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
    - **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
-   - Example: Phase 2.1-2.3 collapse to "Gather test coverage context: completed"
-   - Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
+   - Example - Phase 2 completed:
+   ```json
+   [
+     {"content": "Phase 1: Create Test Session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
+     {"content": "Phase 2: Gather Test Context", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Gathering test context"},
+     {"content": "Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing test generation"},
+     {"content": "Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating test tasks"},
+     {"content": "Phase 5: Return Summary", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Completing"}
+   ]
+   ```
 
 3. **Continuous Execution**:
    - After collapse, automatically proceed to next pending phase
    - No user intervention required between phases
    - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
 
-**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED with mode-specific context gathering) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase executed (tasks ATTACHED with mode-specific context gathering) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
 
 #### Test-Fix-Gen Specific Features
 
@@ -372,16 +426,8 @@ CRITICAL - Next Steps:
 - **Phase 2**: Mode-specific context gathering (session summaries vs codebase analysis)
 - **Phase 3**: Multi-layered test requirements analysis (L0: Static, L1: Unit, L2: Integration, L3: E2E)
 - **Phase 4**: Multi-task generation with quality gate (IMPL-001, IMPL-001.5-review, IMPL-002)
-- **Fix Mode Configuration**: `--use-codex` flag controls IMPL-002 fix mode (manual vs automated)
+- **Fix Mode Configuration**: CLI tool usage determined semantically from user's task description
 
-**Benefits**:
-- Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
-- Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
-- Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
-- Dual-mode support: Both Session Mode and Prompt Mode use same attachment pattern
-- Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
-
-**Note**: Unlike other workflow orchestrators, this file consolidates TodoWrite examples in this section rather than distributing them across Phase descriptions for better dual-mode clarity.
 
 ---
 
@@ -479,16 +525,15 @@ If quality gate fails:
 - Task ID: `IMPL-002`
 - `meta.type: "test-fix"`
 - `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
-- `meta.use_codex: true|false` (based on `--use-codex` flag)
 - `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
 - `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
 
 **Test-Fix Cycle Specification**:
 **Note**: This specification describes what test-cycle-execute orchestrator will do. The agent only executes single tasks.
-- **Cycle Pattern** (orchestrator-managed): test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex) → retest
+- **Cycle Pattern** (orchestrator-managed): test → gemini_diagnose → fix (agent or CLI) → retest
 - **Tools Configuration** (orchestrator-controlled):
   - Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template → surgical fix suggestions
-  - Manual fix application (default) OR Codex if `--use-codex` flag (resume mechanism)
+  - Agent fix application (default) OR CLI if `command` field present in implementation_approach
 - **Exit Conditions** (orchestrator-enforced):
   - Success: All tests pass
   - Failure: Max iterations reached (5)
@@ -534,11 +579,11 @@ WFS-test-[session]/
 **File**: `workflow-session.json`
 
 **Session Mode** includes:
-- `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+- `type: "test"` (set by session:start --type test)
 - `source_session_id: "[sourceSessionId]"` (enables automatic cross-session context)
 
 **Prompt Mode** includes:
-- `workflow_type: "test_session"`
+- `type: "test"` (set by session:start --type test)
 - No `source_session_id` field
 
 ### Execution Flow Diagram
@@ -632,8 +677,7 @@ Key Points:
 4. **Mode Selection**:
    - Use **Session Mode** for completed workflow validation
    - Use **Prompt Mode** for ad-hoc test generation
-   - Use `--use-codex` for autonomous fix application
-   - Use `--cli-execute` for enhanced generation capabilities
+   - Include "use Codex" in description for autonomous fix application
 
 ## Related Commands
 
@@ -646,9 +690,7 @@ Key Points:
 - `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2 (Session Mode): Gather source session context
 - `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2 (Prompt Mode): Analyze codebase directly
 - `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3: Generate test requirements using Gemini
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs using action-planning-agent (autonomous, default)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex` - Phase 4: With automated Codex fixes for IMPL-002 (when `--use-codex` flag used)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute` - Phase 4: With CLI execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation (when `--cli-execute` flag used)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs (CLI tool usage determined semantically)
 
 **Follow-up Commands**:
 - `/workflow:status` - Review generated test tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/test-gen.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: test-gen
 description: Create independent test-fix workflow session from completed implementation session, analyzes code to generate test tasks
-argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] source-session-id"
+argument-hint: "source-session-id"
 allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - **Context-First**: Prioritizes gathering code changes and summaries from source session
 - **Format Reuse**: Creates standard `IMPL-*.json` task, using `meta.type: "test-fix"` for agent assignment
 - **Parameter Simplification**: Tools auto-detect test session type via metadata, no manual cross-session parameters needed
-- **Manual First**: Default to manual fixes, use `--use-codex` flag for automated Codex fix application
+- **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage is determined by user's task description (e.g., "use Codex for fixes")
 
 **Task Attachment Model**:
-- SlashCommand invocation **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
-- When a sub-command is invoked (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
+- SlashCommand dispatch **expands workflow** by attaching sub-tasks to current TodoWrite
+- When a sub-command is executed (e.g., `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`), its internal tasks are attached to the orchestrator's TodoWrite
 - Orchestrator **executes these attached tasks** sequentially
 - After completion, attached tasks are **collapsed** back to high-level phase summary
 - This is **task expansion**, not external delegation
@@ -48,23 +48,44 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 5. **Complete All Phases**: Do not return to user until Phase 5 completes (summary returned)
 6. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
 7. **Automatic Detection**: context-gather auto-detects test session and gathers source session context
-8. **Parse --use-codex Flag**: Extract flag from arguments and pass to Phase 4 (test-task-generate)
+8. **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description, passed to Phase 4
 9. **Command Boundary**: This command ends at Phase 5 summary. Test execution is NOT part of this command.
-10. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
+10. **Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
 11. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
 
 ## 5-Phase Execution
 
 ### Phase 1: Create Test Session
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]\"")`
 
-**Input**: `sourceSessionId` from user argument (e.g., `WFS-user-auth`)
+**Step 1.0: Load Source Session Intent** - Preserve user's original task description for semantic CLI selection
+
+```javascript
+// Read source session metadata to get original task description
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/workflow-session.json")
+// OR if context-package exists:
+Read(".workflow/active/[sourceSessionId]/.process/context-package.json")
+
+// Extract: metadata.task_description or project/description field
+// This preserves user's CLI tool preferences (e.g., "use Codex for fixes")
+```
+
+**Step 1.1: Execute** - Create new test workflow session with preserved intent
+
+```javascript
+// Include original task description to enable semantic CLI selection
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:session:start --new \"Test validation for [sourceSessionId]: [originalTaskDescription]\"")
+```
+
+**Input**:
+- `sourceSessionId` from user argument (e.g., `WFS-user-auth`)
+- `originalTaskDescription` from source session metadata (preserves CLI tool preferences)
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Creates new session with pattern `WFS-test-[source-slug]` (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
 - Writes metadata to `workflow-session.json`:
   - `workflow_type: "test_session"`
   - `source_session_id: "[sourceSessionId]"`
+  - Description includes original user intent for semantic CLI selection
 - Returns new session ID for subsequent phases
 
 **Parse Output**:
@@ -82,7 +103,12 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 ### Phase 2: Gather Test Context
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Step 2.1: Execute** - Gather test coverage context from source session
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-context-gather --session [testSessionId]")
+```
 
 **Input**: `testSessionId` from Phase 1 (e.g., `WFS-test-user-auth`)
 
@@ -104,9 +130,9 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - Test framework detected
 - Test conventions documented
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather invoked, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-context-gather executed, INSERT 3 test-context-gather tasks -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 2 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
   {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
@@ -119,7 +145,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-context-gather's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 2.1-2.3** sequentially
 
@@ -141,7 +167,12 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 ### Phase 3: Test Generation Analysis
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [testContextPath]")`
+
+**Step 3.1: Execute** - Analyze test requirements with Gemini
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session [testSessionId] --context [testContextPath]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
@@ -168,9 +199,9 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
   - Implementation Targets (test files to create)
   - Success Criteria
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When test-concept-enhanced invoked, INSERT 3 concept-enhanced tasks -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-concept-enhanced executed, INSERT 3 concept-enhanced tasks -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 3 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
   {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
@@ -183,7 +214,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-concept-enhanced's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-concept-enhanced's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 3.1-3.3** sequentially
 
@@ -205,12 +236,17 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ---
 
 ### Phase 4: Generate Test Tasks
-**Command**: `SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate [--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session [testSessionId]")`
+
+**Step 4.1: Execute** - Generate test task JSON files and planning documents
+
+```javascript
+SlashCommand(command="/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session [testSessionId]")
+```
 
 **Input**:
 - `testSessionId` from Phase 1
-- `--use-codex` flag (if present in original command) - Controls IMPL-002 fix mode
-- `--cli-execute` flag (if present in original command) - Controls IMPL-001 generation mode
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage for fixes is determined semantically from user's task description (e.g., "use Codex for automated fixes").
 
 **Expected Behavior**:
 - Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from Phase 3
@@ -240,21 +276,20 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 - Task ID: `IMPL-002`
 - `meta.type: "test-fix"`
 - `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
-- `meta.use_codex: true|false` (based on --use-codex flag)
 - `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
 - `context.requirements`: Execute and fix tests
 - `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
-  - **Cycle pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex if --use-codex) → retest
-  - **Tools configuration**: Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template, manual or Codex for fixes
+  - **Cycle pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → fix (agent or CLI based on `command` field) → retest
+  - **Tools configuration**: Gemini for analysis with bug-fix template, agent or CLI for fixes
   - **Exit conditions**: Success (all pass) or failure (max iterations)
 - `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase execution flow
   - Phase 1: Initial test execution
-  - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + manual/Codex fixes (based on flag)
+  - Phase 2: Iterative Gemini diagnosis + fixes (agent or CLI based on step's `command` field)
   - Phase 3: Final validation and certification
 
-<!-- TodoWrite: When test-task-generate invoked, INSERT 3 test-task-generate tasks -->
+<!-- TodoWrite: When test-task-generate executed, INSERT 3 test-task-generate tasks -->
 
-**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand invoked - tasks attached)**:
+**TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 SlashCommand executed - tasks attached)**:
 ```json
 [
   {"content": "Create independent test session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Creating test session"},
@@ -267,7 +302,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*)
 ]
 ```
 
-**Note**: SlashCommand invocation **attaches** test-task-generate's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
+**Note**: SlashCommand dispatch **attaches** test-task-generate's 3 tasks. Orchestrator **executes** these tasks.
 
 **Next Action**: Tasks attached → **Execute Phase 4.1-4.3** sequentially
 
@@ -307,7 +342,7 @@ Artifacts Created:
 
 Test Framework: [detected framework]
 Test Files to Generate: [count]
-Fix Mode: [Manual|Codex Automated] (based on --use-codex flag)
+Fix Mode: [Agent|CLI] (based on `command` field in implementation_approach steps)
 
 Review Generated Artifacts:
 - Test plan: .workflow/[testSessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md
@@ -329,7 +364,7 @@ Ready for execution. Use appropriate workflow commands to proceed.
 
 ### Key Principles
 
-1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand invoked):
+1. **Task Attachment** (when SlashCommand executed):
    - Sub-command's internal tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
    - Example: `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` attaches 3 sub-tasks (Phase 2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
    - First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
@@ -346,20 +381,16 @@ Ready for execution. Use appropriate workflow commands to proceed.
    - No user intervention required between phases
    - TodoWrite dynamically reflects current execution state
 
-**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase invoked (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
+**Lifecycle Summary**: Initial pending tasks → Phase executed (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed sequentially → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED to summary) → Next phase begins → Repeat until all phases complete.
 
 ### Test-Gen Specific Features
 
 - **Phase 2**: Cross-session context gathering from source implementation session
 - **Phase 3**: Test requirements analysis with Gemini for generation strategy
 - **Phase 4**: Dual-task generation (IMPL-001 for test generation, IMPL-002 for test execution)
-- **Fix Mode Configuration**: `--use-codex` flag controls IMPL-002 fix mode (manual vs automated)
+- **Fix Mode Configuration**: CLI tool usage determined semantically from user's task description
+
 
-**Benefits**:
-- Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
-- Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
-- Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
-- Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
 
 **Note**: See individual Phase descriptions (Phase 2, 3, 4) for detailed TodoWrite Update examples with full JSON structures.
 
@@ -428,7 +459,7 @@ Generates two task definition files:
   - Agent: @test-fix-agent
   - Dependency: IMPL-001 must complete first
   - Max iterations: 5
-  - Fix mode: Manual or Codex (based on --use-codex flag)
+  - Fix mode: Agent or CLI (based on `command` field in implementation_approach)
 
 See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete task JSON schemas.
 
@@ -465,11 +496,10 @@ Created in `.workflow/active/WFS-test-[session]/`:
 **IMPL-002.json Structure**:
 - `meta.type: "test-fix"`
 - `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`
-- `meta.use_codex`: true/false (based on --use-codex flag)
 - `context.depends_on: ["IMPL-001"]`
 - `flow_control.implementation_approach.test_fix_cycle`: Complete cycle specification
   - Gemini diagnosis template
-  - Fix application mode (manual/codex)
+  - Fix application mode (agent or CLI based on `command` field)
   - Max iterations: 5
 - `flow_control.implementation_approach.modification_points`: 3-phase flow
 
@@ -487,13 +517,11 @@ See `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` for complete JSON schemas.
 **Prerequisite Commands**:
 - `/workflow:plan` or `/workflow:execute` - Complete implementation session that needs test validation
 
-**Called by This Command** (5 phases):
+**Executed by This Command** (4 phases):
 - `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create independent test workflow session
 - `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` - Phase 2: Analyze test coverage and gather source session context
 - `/workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced` - Phase 3: Generate test requirements and strategy using Gemini
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs using action-planning-agent (autonomous, default)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex` - Phase 4: With automated Codex fixes for IMPL-002 (when `--use-codex` flag used)
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute` - Phase 4: With CLI execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation (when `--cli-execute` flag used)
+- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Phase 4: Generate test task JSONs (CLI tool usage determined semantically)
 
 **Follow-up Commands**:
 - `/workflow:status` - Review generated test tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/conflict-resolution.md

@@ -12,11 +12,6 @@ examples:
 ## Purpose
 Analyzes conflicts between implementation plans and existing codebase, **including module scenario uniqueness detection**, generating multiple resolution strategies with **iterative clarification until boundaries are clear**.
 
-**Key Enhancements**:
-- **Scenario Uniqueness Detection**: Agent searches all existing modules to identify functional overlaps
-- **Iterative Clarification Loop**: Unlimited questions per conflict until scenario boundaries are uniquely defined (max 10 rounds)
-- **Dynamic Re-analysis**: Agent updates strategies based on user clarifications
-
 **Scope**: Detection and strategy generation only - NO code modification or task creation.
 
 **Trigger**: Auto-executes in `/workflow:plan` Phase 3 when `conflict_risk ≥ medium`.
@@ -64,6 +59,41 @@ Analyzes conflicts between implementation plans and existing codebase, **includi
 - Module merge/split decisions
 - **Requires iterative clarification until uniqueness confirmed**
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session, --context
+   └─ Validation: Both REQUIRED, conflict_risk >= medium
+
+Phase 1: Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Verify session directory exists
+   ├─ Step 2: Load context-package.json
+   ├─ Step 3: Check conflict_risk (skip if none/low)
+   └─ Step 4: Prepare agent task prompt
+
+Phase 2: CLI-Powered Analysis (Agent)
+   ├─ Execute Gemini analysis (Qwen fallback)
+   ├─ Detect conflicts including ModuleOverlap category
+   └─ Generate 2-4 strategies per conflict with modifications
+
+Phase 3: Iterative User Interaction
+   └─ FOR each conflict (one by one):
+      ├─ Display conflict with overlap_analysis (if ModuleOverlap)
+      ├─ Display strategies (2-4 + custom option)
+      ├─ User selects strategy
+      └─ IF clarification_needed:
+         ├─ Collect answers
+         ├─ Agent re-analysis
+         └─ Loop until uniqueness_confirmed (max 10 rounds)
+
+Phase 4: Apply Modifications
+   ├─ Step 1: Extract modifications from resolved strategies
+   ├─ Step 2: Apply using Edit tool
+   ├─ Step 3: Update context-package.json (mark resolved)
+   └─ Step 4: Output custom conflict summary (if any)
+```
+
 ## Execution Flow
 
 ### Phase 1: Validation
@@ -78,42 +108,54 @@ Analyzes conflicts between implementation plans and existing codebase, **includi
 
 **Agent Delegation**:
 ```javascript
-Task(subagent_type="cli-execution-agent", prompt=`
+Task(subagent_type="cli-execution-agent", run_in_background=false, prompt=`
   ## Context
   - Session: {session_id}
   - Risk: {conflict_risk}
   - Files: {existing_files_list}
 
+  ## Exploration Context (from context-package.exploration_results)
+  - Exploration Count: ${contextPackage.exploration_results?.exploration_count || 0}
+  - Angles Analyzed: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage.exploration_results?.angles || [])}
+  - Pre-identified Conflict Indicators: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.conflict_indicators || [])}
+  - Critical Files: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.critical_files?.map(f => f.path) || [])}
+  - All Patterns: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.all_patterns || [])}
+  - All Integration Points: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage.exploration_results?.aggregated_insights?.all_integration_points || [])}
+
   ## Analysis Steps
 
+  ### 0. Load Output Schema (MANDATORY)
+  Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/conflict-resolution-schema.json
+
   ### 1. Load Context
   - Read existing files from conflict_detection.existing_files
   - Load plan from .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json
+  - **NEW**: Load exploration_results and use aggregated_insights for enhanced analysis
   - Extract role analyses and requirements
 
-  ### 2. Execute CLI Analysis (Enhanced with Scenario Uniqueness Detection)
+  ### 2. Execute CLI Analysis (Enhanced with Exploration + Scenario Uniqueness)
 
   Primary (Gemini):
-  cd {project_root} && gemini -p "
-  PURPOSE: Detect conflicts between plan and codebase, including module scenario overlaps
+  ccw cli -p "
+  PURPOSE: Detect conflicts between plan and codebase, using exploration insights
   TASK:
-  • Compare architectures
+  • **Review pre-identified conflict_indicators from exploration results**
+  • Compare architectures (use exploration key_patterns)
   • Identify breaking API changes
   • Detect data model incompatibilities
   • Assess dependency conflicts
-  • **NEW: Analyze module scenario uniqueness**
-    - Extract new module functionality from plan
-    - Search all existing modules with similar functionality
-    - Compare scenario coverage and identify overlaps
+  • **Analyze module scenario uniqueness**
+    - Use exploration integration_points for precise locations
+    - Cross-validate with exploration critical_files
     - Generate clarification questions for boundary definition
   MODE: analysis
   CONTEXT: @**/*.ts @**/*.js @**/*.tsx @**/*.jsx @.workflow/active/{session_id}/**/*
-  EXPECTED: Conflict list with severity ratings, including ModuleOverlap conflicts with:
-    - Existing module list with scenarios
-    - Overlap analysis matrix
+  EXPECTED: Conflict list with severity ratings, including:
+    - Validation of exploration conflict_indicators
+    - ModuleOverlap conflicts with overlap_analysis
     - Targeted clarification questions
-  RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt) | Focus on breaking changes, migration needs, and functional overlaps | analysis=READ-ONLY
-  "
+  RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt) | Focus on breaking changes, migration needs, and functional overlaps | Prioritize exploration-identified conflicts | analysis=READ-ONLY
+  " --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {project_root}
 
   Fallback: Qwen (same prompt) → Claude (manual analysis)
 
@@ -130,125 +172,16 @@ Task(subagent_type="cli-execution-agent", prompt=`
 
   ### 4. Return Structured Conflict Data
 
-  ⚠️ DO NOT generate CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file
+  ⚠️ Output to conflict-resolution.json (generated in Phase 4)
 
-  Return JSON format for programmatic processing:
+  **Schema Reference**: Execute \`cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/conflict-resolution-schema.json\` to get full schema
 
-  \`\`\`json
-  {
-    "conflicts": [
-      {
-        "id": "CON-001",
-        "brief": "一行中文冲突摘要",
-        "severity": "Critical|High|Medium",
-        "category": "Architecture|API|Data|Dependency|ModuleOverlap",
-        "affected_files": [
-          ".workflow/active/{session}/.brainstorm/guidance-specification.md",
-          ".workflow/active/{session}/.brainstorm/system-architect/analysis.md"
-        ],
-        "description": "详细描述冲突 - 什么不兼容",
-        "impact": {
-          "scope": "影响的模块/组件",
-          "compatibility": "Yes|No|Partial",
-          "migration_required": true|false,
-          "estimated_effort": "人天估计"
-        },
-        "overlap_analysis": {
-          "// NOTE": "仅当 category=ModuleOverlap 时需要此字段",
-          "new_module": {
-            "name": "新模块名称",
-            "scenarios": ["场景1", "场景2", "场景3"],
-            "responsibilities": "职责描述"
-          },
-          "existing_modules": [
-            {
-              "file": "src/existing/module.ts",
-              "name": "现有模块名称",
-              "scenarios": ["场景A", "场景B"],
-              "overlap_scenarios": ["重叠场景1", "重叠场景2"],
-              "responsibilities": "现有模块职责"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "strategies": [
-          {
-            "name": "策略名称（中文）",
-            "approach": "实现方法简述",
-            "complexity": "Low|Medium|High",
-            "risk": "Low|Medium|High",
-            "effort": "时间估计",
-            "pros": ["优点1", "优点2"],
-            "cons": ["缺点1", "缺点2"],
-            "clarification_needed": [
-              "// NOTE: 仅当需要用户进一步澄清时需要此字段（尤其是 ModuleOverlap）",
-              "新模块的核心职责边界是什么？",
-              "如何与现有模块 X 协作？",
-              "哪些场景应该由新模块处理？"
-            ],
-            "modifications": [
-              {
-                "file": ".workflow/active/{session}/.brainstorm/guidance-specification.md",
-                "section": "## 2. System Architect Decisions",
-                "change_type": "update",
-                "old_content": "原始内容片段（用于定位）",
-                "new_content": "修改后的内容",
-                "rationale": "为什么这样改"
-              },
-              {
-                "file": ".workflow/active/{session}/.brainstorm/system-architect/analysis.md",
-                "section": "## Design Decisions",
-                "change_type": "update",
-                "old_content": "原始内容片段",
-                "new_content": "修改后的内容",
-                "rationale": "修改理由"
-              }
-            ]
-          },
-          {
-            "name": "策略2名称",
-            "approach": "...",
-            "complexity": "Medium",
-            "risk": "Low",
-            "effort": "1-2天",
-            "pros": ["优点"],
-            "cons": ["缺点"],
-            "modifications": [...]
-          }
-        ],
-        "recommended": 0,
-        "modification_suggestions": [
-          "建议1：具体的修改方向或注意事项",
-          "建议2：可能需要考虑的边界情况",
-          "建议3：相关的最佳实践或模式"
-        ]
-      }
-    ],
-    "summary": {
-      "total": 2,
-      "critical": 1,
-      "high": 1,
-      "medium": 0
-    }
-  }
-  \`\`\`
-
-  ⚠️ CRITICAL Requirements for modifications field:
-  - old_content: Must be exact text from target file (20-100 chars for unique match)
-  - new_content: Complete replacement text (maintains formatting)
-  - change_type: "update" (replace), "add" (insert), "remove" (delete)
-  - file: Full path relative to project root
-  - section: Markdown heading for context (helps locate position)
+  Return JSON following the schema above. Key requirements:
   - Minimum 2 strategies per conflict, max 4
-  - All text in Chinese for user-facing fields (brief, name, pros, cons)
-  - modification_suggestions: 2-5 actionable suggestions for custom handling (Chinese)
-
-  Quality Standards:
-  - Each strategy must have actionable modifications
-  - old_content must be precise enough for Edit tool matching
-  - new_content preserves markdown formatting and structure
-  - Recommended strategy (index) based on lowest complexity + risk
-  - modification_suggestions must be specific, actionable, and context-aware
-  - Each suggestion should address a specific aspect (compatibility, migration, testing, etc.)
+  - All text in Chinese for user-facing fields (brief, name, pros, cons, modification_suggestions)
+  - modifications.old_content: 20-100 chars for unique Edit tool matching
+  - modifications.new_content: preserves markdown formatting
+  - modification_suggestions: 2-5 actionable suggestions for custom handling
 `)
 ```
 
@@ -273,143 +206,85 @@ Task(subagent_type="cli-execution-agent", prompt=`
 8. Return execution log path
 ```
 
-### Phase 3: Iterative User Interaction with Clarification Loop
+### Phase 3: User Interaction Loop
 
-**Execution Flow**:
-```
-FOR each conflict (逐个处理，无数量限制):
-  clarified = false
-  round = 0
-  userClarifications = []
+```javascript
+FOR each conflict:
+  round = 0, clarified = false, userClarifications = []
 
-  WHILE (!clarified && round < 10):
-    round++
+  WHILE (!clarified && round++ < 10):
+    // 1. Display conflict info (text output for context)
+    displayConflictSummary(conflict)  // id, brief, severity, overlap_analysis if ModuleOverlap
 
-    // 1. Display conflict (包含所有关键字段)
-    - category, id, brief, severity, description
-    - IF ModuleOverlap: 展示 overlap_analysis
-      * new_module: {name, scenarios, responsibilities}
-      * existing_modules[]: {file, name, scenarios, overlap_scenarios, responsibilities}
+    // 2. Strategy selection via AskUserQuestion
+    AskUserQuestion({
+      questions: [{
+        question: formatStrategiesForDisplay(conflict.strategies),
+        header: "策略选择",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          ...conflict.strategies.map((s, i) => ({
+            label: `${s.name}${i === conflict.recommended ? ' (推荐)' : ''}`,
+            description: `${s.complexity}复杂度 | ${s.risk}风险${s.clarification_needed?.length ? ' | ⚠️需澄清' : ''}`
+          })),
+          { label: "自定义修改", description: `建议: ${conflict.modification_suggestions?.slice(0,2).join('; ')}` }
+        ]
+      }]
+    })
 
-    // 2. Display strategies (2-4个策略 + 自定义选项)
-    - FOR each strategy: {name, approach, complexity, risk, effort, pros, cons}
-      * IF clarification_needed: 展示待澄清问题列表
-    - 自定义选项: {suggestions: modification_suggestions[]}
+    // 3. Handle selection
+    if (userChoice === "自定义修改") {
+      customConflicts.push({ id, brief, category, suggestions, overlap_analysis })
+      break
+    }
 
-    // 3. User selects strategy
-    userChoice = readInput()
+    selectedStrategy = findStrategyByName(userChoice)
 
-    IF userChoice == "自定义":
-      customConflicts.push({id, brief, category, suggestions, overlap_analysis})
-      clarified = true
-      BREAK
+    // 4. Clarification (if needed) - batched max 4 per call
+    if (selectedStrategy.clarification_needed?.length > 0) {
+      for (batch of chunk(selectedStrategy.clarification_needed, 4)) {
+        AskUserQuestion({
+          questions: batch.map((q, i) => ({
+            question: q, header: `澄清${i+1}`, multiSelect: false,
+            options: [{ label: "详细说明", description: "提供答案" }]
+          }))
+        })
+        userClarifications.push(...collectAnswers(batch))
+      }
 
-    selectedStrategy = strategies[userChoice]
-
-    // 4. Clarification loop
-    IF selectedStrategy.clarification_needed.length > 0:
-      // 收集澄清答案
-      FOR each question:
-        answer = readInput()
-        userClarifications.push({question, answer})
-
-      // Agent 重新分析
-      reanalysisResult = Task(cli-execution-agent, prompt={
-        冲突信息: {id, brief, category, 策略}
-        用户澄清: userClarifications[]
-        场景分析: overlap_analysis (if ModuleOverlap)
-
-        输出: {
-          uniqueness_confirmed: bool,
-          rationale: string,
-          updated_strategy: {name, approach, complexity, risk, effort, modifications[]},
-          remaining_questions: [] (如果仍有歧义)
-        }
+      // 5. Agent re-analysis
+      reanalysisResult = Task({
+        subagent_type: "cli-execution-agent",
+        run_in_background: false,
+        prompt: `Conflict: ${conflict.id}, Strategy: ${selectedStrategy.name}
+User Clarifications: ${JSON.stringify(userClarifications)}
+Output: { uniqueness_confirmed, rationale, updated_strategy, remaining_questions }`
       })
 
-      IF reanalysisResult.uniqueness_confirmed:
-        selectedStrategy = updated_strategy
-        selectedStrategy.clarifications = userClarifications
+      if (reanalysisResult.uniqueness_confirmed) {
+        selectedStrategy = { ...reanalysisResult.updated_strategy, clarifications: userClarifications }
         clarified = true
-      ELSE:
-        // 更新澄清问题，继续下一轮
-        selectedStrategy.clarification_needed = remaining_questions
-    ELSE:
+      } else {
+        selectedStrategy.clarification_needed = reanalysisResult.remaining_questions
+      }
+    } else {
       clarified = true
+    }
 
-    resolvedConflicts.push({conflict, strategy: selectedStrategy})
+    if (clarified) resolvedConflicts.push({ conflict, strategy: selectedStrategy })
   END WHILE
 END FOR
 
-// Build output
 selectedStrategies = resolvedConflicts.map(r => ({
-  conflict_id, strategy, clarifications[]
+  conflict_id: r.conflict.id, strategy: r.strategy, clarifications: r.strategy.clarifications || []
 }))
 ```
 
-**Key Data Structures**:
-
-```javascript
-// Custom conflict tracking
-customConflicts[] = {
-  id, brief, category,
-  suggestions: modification_suggestions[],
-  overlap_analysis: { new_module{}, existing_modules[] }  // ModuleOverlap only
-}
-
-// Agent re-analysis prompt output
-{
-  uniqueness_confirmed: bool,
-  rationale: string,
-  updated_strategy: {
-    name, approach, complexity, risk, effort,
-    modifications: [{file, section, change_type, old_content, new_content, rationale}]
-  },
-  remaining_questions: string[]
-}
-```
-
-**Text Output Example** (展示关键字段):
-
-```markdown
-============================================================
-冲突 1/3 - 第 1 轮
-============================================================
-【ModuleOverlap】CON-001: 新增用户认证服务与现有模块功能重叠
-严重程度: High | 描述: 计划中的 UserAuthService 与现有 AuthManager 场景重叠
-
---- 场景重叠分析 ---
-新模块: UserAuthService | 场景: 登录, Token验证, 权限, MFA
-现有模块: AuthManager (src/auth/AuthManager.ts) | 重叠: 登录, Token验证
-
---- 解决策略 ---
-1) 合并 (Low复杂度 | Low风险 | 2-3天)
-   ⚠️ 需澄清: AuthManager是否能承担MFA？
-
-2) 拆分边界 (Medium复杂度 | Medium风险 | 4-5天)
-   ⚠️ 需澄清: 基础/高级认证边界? Token验证归谁?
-
-3) 自定义修改
-   建议: 评估扩展性; 策略模式分离; 定义接口边界
-
-请选择 (1-3): > 2
-
---- 澄清问答 (第1轮) ---
-Q: 基础/高级认证边界?
-A: 基础=密码登录+token验证, 高级=MFA+OAuth+SSO
-
-Q: Token验证归谁?
-A: 统一由 AuthManager 负责
-
-🔄 重新分析...
-✅ 唯一性已确认 | 理由: 边界清晰 - AuthManager(基础+token), UserAuthService(MFA+OAuth+SSO)
-
-============================================================
-冲突 2/3 - 第 1 轮 [下一个冲突]
-============================================================
-```
-
-**Loop Characteristics**: 逐个处理 | 无限轮次(max 10) | 动态问题生成 | Agent重新分析判断唯一性 | ModuleOverlap场景边界澄清
+**Key Points**:
+- AskUserQuestion: max 4 questions/call, batch if more
+- Strategy options: 2-4 strategies + "自定义修改"
+- Clarification loop: max 10 rounds, agent判断 uniqueness_confirmed
+- Custom conflicts: 记录 overlap_analysis 供后续手动处理
 
 ### Phase 4: Apply Modifications
 
@@ -428,14 +303,30 @@ selectedStrategies.forEach(item => {
 
 console.log(`\n正在应用 ${modifications.length} 个修改...`);
 
-// 2. Apply each modification using Edit tool
+// 2. Apply each modification using Edit tool (with fallback to context-package.json)
 const appliedModifications = [];
 const failedModifications = [];
+const fallbackConstraints = [];  // For files that don't exist
 
 modifications.forEach((mod, idx) => {
   try {
     console.log(`[${idx + 1}/${modifications.length}] 修改 ${mod.file}...`);
 
+    // Check if target file exists (brainstorm files may not exist in lite workflow)
+    if (!file_exists(mod.file)) {
+      console.log(`  ⚠️ 文件不存在，写入 context-package.json 作为约束`);
+      fallbackConstraints.push({
+        source: "conflict-resolution",
+        conflict_id: mod.conflict_id,
+        target_file: mod.file,
+        section: mod.section,
+        change_type: mod.change_type,
+        content: mod.new_content,
+        rationale: mod.rationale
+      });
+      return;  // Skip to next modification
+    }
+
     if (mod.change_type === "update") {
       Edit({
         file_path: mod.file,
@@ -463,14 +354,45 @@ modifications.forEach((mod, idx) => {
   }
 });
 
-// 3. Update context-package.json with resolution details
+// 2b. Generate conflict-resolution.json output file
+const resolutionOutput = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  resolved_at: new Date().toISOString(),
+  summary: {
+    total_conflicts: conflicts.length,
+    resolved_with_strategy: selectedStrategies.length,
+    custom_handling: customConflicts.length,
+    fallback_constraints: fallbackConstraints.length
+  },
+  resolved_conflicts: selectedStrategies.map(s => ({
+    conflict_id: s.conflict_id,
+    strategy_name: s.strategy.name,
+    strategy_approach: s.strategy.approach,
+    clarifications: s.clarifications || [],
+    modifications_applied: s.strategy.modifications?.filter(m =>
+      appliedModifications.some(am => am.conflict_id === s.conflict_id)
+    ) || []
+  })),
+  custom_conflicts: customConflicts.map(c => ({
+    id: c.id,
+    brief: c.brief,
+    category: c.category,
+    suggestions: c.suggestions,
+    overlap_analysis: c.overlap_analysis || null
+  })),
+  planning_constraints: fallbackConstraints,  // Constraints for files that don't exist
+  failed_modifications: failedModifications
+};
+
+const resolutionPath = `.workflow/active/${sessionId}/.process/conflict-resolution.json`;
+Write(resolutionPath, JSON.stringify(resolutionOutput, null, 2));
+console.log(`\n📄 冲突解决结果已保存: ${resolutionPath}`);
+
+// 3. Update context-package.json with resolution details (reference to JSON file)
 const contextPackage = JSON.parse(Read(contextPath));
 contextPackage.conflict_detection.conflict_risk = "resolved";
-contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolved_conflicts = selectedStrategies.map(s => ({
-  conflict_id: s.conflict_id,
-  strategy_name: s.strategy.name,
-  clarifications: s.clarifications
-}));
+contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolution_file = resolutionPath;  // Reference to detailed JSON
+contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolved_conflicts = selectedStrategies.map(s => s.conflict_id);
 contextPackage.conflict_detection.custom_conflicts = customConflicts.map(c => c.id);
 contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolved_at = new Date().toISOString();
 Write(contextPath, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2));
@@ -543,12 +465,50 @@ return {
 ✓ Agent log saved to .workflow/active/{session_id}/.chat/
 ```
 
-## Output Format: Agent JSON Response
+## Output Format
+
+### Primary Output: conflict-resolution.json
+
+**Path**: `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/conflict-resolution.json`
+
+**Schema**:
+```json
+{
+  "session_id": "WFS-xxx",
+  "resolved_at": "ISO timestamp",
+  "summary": {
+    "total_conflicts": 3,
+    "resolved_with_strategy": 2,
+    "custom_handling": 1,
+    "fallback_constraints": 0
+  },
+  "resolved_conflicts": [
+    {
+      "conflict_id": "CON-001",
+      "strategy_name": "策略名称",
+      "strategy_approach": "实现方法",
+      "clarifications": [],
+      "modifications_applied": []
+    }
+  ],
+  "custom_conflicts": [
+    {
+      "id": "CON-002",
+      "brief": "冲突摘要",
+      "category": "ModuleOverlap",
+      "suggestions": ["建议1", "建议2"],
+      "overlap_analysis": null
+    }
+  ],
+  "planning_constraints": [],
+  "failed_modifications": []
+}
+```
+
+### Secondary: Agent JSON Response (stdout)
 
 **Focus**: Structured conflict data with actionable modifications for programmatic processing.
 
-**Format**: JSON to stdout (NO file generation)
-
 **Structure**: Defined in Phase 2, Step 4 (agent prompt)
 
 ### Key Requirements
@@ -596,11 +556,12 @@ If Edit tool fails mid-application:
 - Requires: `conflict_risk ≥ medium`
 
 **Output**:
-- Modified files:
+- Generated file:
+  - `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/conflict-resolution.json` (primary output)
+- Modified files (if exist):
   - `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.brainstorm/guidance-specification.md`
   - `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.brainstorm/{role}/analysis.md`
-  - `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json` (conflict_risk → resolved)
-- NO report file generation
+  - `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json` (conflict_risk → resolved, resolution_file reference)
 
 **User Interaction**:
 - **Iterative conflict processing**: One conflict at a time, not in batches
@@ -628,7 +589,7 @@ If Edit tool fails mid-application:
 ✓ guidance-specification.md updated with resolved conflicts
 ✓ Role analyses (*.md) updated with resolved conflicts
 ✓ context-package.json marked as "resolved" with clarification records
-✓ No CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file generated
+✓ conflict-resolution.json generated with full resolution details
 ✓ Modification summary includes:
   - Total conflicts
   - Resolved with strategy (count)

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/context-gather.md

@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ allowed-tools: Task(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 
 Orchestrator command that invokes `context-search-agent` to gather comprehensive project context for implementation planning. Generates standardized `context-package.json` with codebase analysis, dependencies, and conflict detection.
 
-**Agent**: `context-search-agent` (`.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md`)
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
@@ -24,6 +23,37 @@ Orchestrator command that invokes `context-search-agent` to gather comprehensive
 - **Plan Mode**: Full comprehensive analysis (vs lightweight brainstorm mode)
 - **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/active/{session}/.process/context-package.json`
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session
+   └─ Parse: task_description (required)
+
+Step 1: Context-Package Detection
+   └─ Decision (existing package):
+      ├─ Valid package exists → Return existing (skip execution)
+      └─ No valid package → Continue to Step 2
+
+Step 2: Complexity Assessment & Parallel Explore (NEW)
+   ├─ Analyze task_description → classify Low/Medium/High
+   ├─ Select exploration angles (1-4 based on complexity)
+   ├─ Launch N cli-explore-agents in parallel
+   │  └─ Each outputs: exploration-{angle}.json
+   └─ Generate explorations-manifest.json
+
+Step 3: Invoke Context-Search Agent (with exploration input)
+   ├─ Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
+   ├─ Phase 2: Multi-Source Discovery
+   │  ├─ Track 0: Exploration Synthesis (prioritize & deduplicate)
+   │  ├─ Track 1-4: Existing tracks
+   └─ Phase 3: Synthesis & Packaging
+      └─ Generate context-package.json with exploration_results
+
+Step 4: Output Verification
+   └─ Verify context-package.json contains exploration_results
+```
+
 ## Execution Flow
 
 ### Step 1: Context-Package Detection
@@ -48,17 +78,146 @@ if (file_exists(contextPackagePath)) {
 }
 ```
 
-### Step 2: Invoke Context-Search Agent
+### Step 2: Complexity Assessment & Parallel Explore
 
 **Only execute if Step 1 finds no valid package**
 
+```javascript
+// 2.1 Complexity Assessment
+function analyzeTaskComplexity(taskDescription) {
+  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
+  if (/architect|refactor|restructure|modular|cross-module/.test(text)) return 'High';
+  if (/multiple|several|integrate|migrate|extend/.test(text)) return 'Medium';
+  return 'Low';
+}
+
+const ANGLE_PRESETS = {
+  architecture: ['architecture', 'dependencies', 'modularity', 'integration-points'],
+  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
+  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
+  bugfix: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
+  feature: ['patterns', 'integration-points', 'testing', 'dependencies'],
+  refactor: ['architecture', 'patterns', 'dependencies', 'testing']
+};
+
+function selectAngles(taskDescription, complexity) {
+  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase();
+  let preset = 'feature';
+  if (/refactor|architect|restructure/.test(text)) preset = 'architecture';
+  else if (/security|auth|permission/.test(text)) preset = 'security';
+  else if (/performance|slow|optimi/.test(text)) preset = 'performance';
+  else if (/fix|bug|error|issue/.test(text)) preset = 'bugfix';
+
+  const count = complexity === 'High' ? 4 : (complexity === 'Medium' ? 3 : 1);
+  return ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count);
+}
+
+const complexity = analyzeTaskComplexity(task_description);
+const selectedAngles = selectAngles(task_description, complexity);
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/active/${session_id}/.process`;
+
+// 2.2 Launch Parallel Explore Agents
+const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,
+    description=`Explore: ${angle}`,
+    prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
+
+## Assigned Context
+- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Session ID**: ${session_id}
+- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
+- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
+2. Run: rg -l "{keyword_from_task}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
+3. Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/explore-json-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+
+## Exploration Strategy (${angle} focus)
+
+**Step 1: Structural Scan** (Bash)
+- get_modules_by_depth.sh → identify modules related to ${angle}
+- find/rg → locate files relevant to ${angle} aspect
+- Analyze imports/dependencies from ${angle} perspective
+
+**Step 2: Semantic Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
+- How does existing code handle ${angle} concerns?
+- What patterns are used for ${angle}?
+- Where would new code integrate from ${angle} viewpoint?
+
+**Step 3: Write Output**
+- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
+- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
+
+## Expected Output
+
+**File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
+
+**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
+- project_structure: Modules/architecture relevant to ${angle}
+- relevant_files: Files affected from ${angle} perspective
+  **IMPORTANT**: Use object format with relevance scores for synthesis:
+  \`[{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Core ${angle} logic"}]\`
+  Scores: 0.7+ high priority, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low
+- patterns: ${angle}-related patterns to follow
+- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle}
+- integration_points: Where to integrate from ${angle} viewpoint (include file:line locations)
+- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations/conventions
+- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
+- _metadata.exploration_angle: "${angle}"
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Schema obtained via cat explore-json-schema.json
+- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
+- [ ] At least 3 relevant files identified with ${angle} rationale
+- [ ] Patterns are actionable (code examples, not generic advice)
+- [ ] Integration points include file:line locations
+- [ ] Constraints are project-specific to ${angle}
+- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
+
+## Output
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
+`
+  )
+);
+
+// 2.3 Generate Manifest after all complete
+const explorationFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "exploration-*.json" -type f`).split('\n').filter(f => f.trim());
+const explorationManifest = {
+  session_id,
+  task_description,
+  timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+  complexity,
+  exploration_count: selectedAngles.length,
+  angles_explored: selectedAngles,
+  explorations: explorationFiles.map(file => {
+    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file));
+    return { angle: data._metadata.exploration_angle, file: file.split('/').pop(), path: file, index: data._metadata.exploration_index };
+  })
+};
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationManifest, null, 2));
+```
+
+### Step 3: Invoke Context-Search Agent
+
+**Only execute after Step 2 completes**
+
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="context-search-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
   description="Gather comprehensive context for plan",
   prompt=`
-You are executing as context-search-agent (.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md).
-
 ## Execution Mode
 **PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution
 
@@ -67,17 +226,27 @@ You are executing as context-search-agent (.claude/agents/context-search-agent.m
 - **Task Description**: ${task_description}
 - **Output Path**: .workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json
 
+## Exploration Input (from Step 2)
+- **Manifest**: ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json
+- **Exploration Count**: ${explorationManifest.exploration_count}
+- **Angles**: ${explorationManifest.angles_explored.join(', ')}
+- **Complexity**: ${complexity}
+
 ## Mission
 Execute complete context-search-agent workflow for implementation planning:
 
 ### Phase 1: Initialization & Pre-Analysis
-1. **Project State Loading**: Read and parse `.workflow/project.json`. Use its `overview` section as the foundational `project_context`. This is your primary source for architecture, tech stack, and key components. If file doesn't exist, proceed with fresh analysis.
+1. **Project State Loading**:
+   - Read and parse `.workflow/project-tech.json`. Use its `technology_analysis` section as the foundational `project_context`. This is your primary source for architecture, tech stack, and key components.
+   - Read and parse `.workflow/project-guidelines.json`. Load `conventions`, `constraints`, and `learnings` into a `project_guidelines` section.
+   - If files don't exist, proceed with fresh analysis.
 2. **Detection**: Check for existing context-package (early exit if valid)
-3. **Foundation**: Initialize code-index, get project structure, load docs
+3. **Foundation**: Initialize CodexLens, get project structure, load docs
 4. **Analysis**: Extract keywords, determine scope, classify complexity based on task description and project state
 
 ### Phase 2: Multi-Source Context Discovery
-Execute all 4 discovery tracks:
+Execute all discovery tracks:
+- **Track 0**: Exploration Synthesis (load ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json, prioritize critical_files, deduplicate patterns/integration_points)
 - **Track 1**: Historical archive analysis (query manifest.json for lessons learned)
 - **Track 2**: Reference documentation (CLAUDE.md, architecture docs)
 - **Track 3**: Web examples (use Exa MCP for unfamiliar tech/APIs)
@@ -85,21 +254,24 @@ Execute all 4 discovery tracks:
 
 ### Phase 3: Synthesis, Assessment & Packaging
 1. Apply relevance scoring and build dependency graph
-2. **Synthesize 4-source data**: Merge findings from all sources (archive > docs > code > web). **Prioritize the context from `project.json`** for architecture and tech stack unless code analysis reveals it's outdated.
-3. **Populate `project_context`**: Directly use the `overview` from `project.json` to fill the `project_context` section of the output `context-package.json`. Include technology_stack, architecture, key_components, and entry_points.
-4. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
-5. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
-6. **Inject historical conflicts** from archive analysis into conflict_detection
-7. Generate and validate context-package.json
+2. **Synthesize 4-source data**: Merge findings from all sources (archive > docs > code > web). **Prioritize the context from `project-tech.json`** for architecture and tech stack unless code analysis reveals it's outdated.
+3. **Populate `project_context`**: Directly use the `technology_analysis` from `project-tech.json` to fill the `project_context` section. Include description, technology_stack, architecture, and key_components.
+4. **Populate `project_guidelines`**: Load conventions, constraints, and learnings from `project-guidelines.json` into a dedicated section.
+5. Integrate brainstorm artifacts (if .brainstorming/ exists, read content)
+6. Perform conflict detection with risk assessment
+7. **Inject historical conflicts** from archive analysis into conflict_detection
+8. Generate and validate context-package.json
 
 ## Output Requirements
 Complete context-package.json with:
 - **metadata**: task_description, keywords, complexity, tech_stack, session_id
-- **project_context**: architecture_patterns, coding_conventions, tech_stack (sourced from `project.json` overview)
+- **project_context**: description, technology_stack, architecture, key_components (sourced from `project-tech.json`)
+- **project_guidelines**: {conventions, constraints, quality_rules, learnings} (sourced from `project-guidelines.json`)
 - **assets**: {documentation[], source_code[], config[], tests[]} with relevance scores
 - **dependencies**: {internal[], external[]} with dependency graph
 - **brainstorm_artifacts**: {guidance_specification, role_analyses[], synthesis_output} with content
 - **conflict_detection**: {risk_level, risk_factors, affected_modules[], mitigation_strategy, historical_conflicts[]}
+- **exploration_results**: {manifest_path, exploration_count, angles, explorations[], aggregated_insights} (from Track 0)
 
 ## Quality Validation
 Before completion verify:
@@ -116,7 +288,7 @@ Report completion with statistics.
 )
 ```
 
-### Step 3: Output Verification
+### Step 4: Output Verification
 
 After agent completes, verify output:
 
@@ -126,6 +298,12 @@ const outputPath = `.workflow/${session_id}/.process/context-package.json`;
 if (!file_exists(outputPath)) {
   throw new Error("❌ Agent failed to generate context-package.json");
 }
+
+// Verify exploration_results included
+const pkg = JSON.parse(Read(outputPath));
+if (pkg.exploration_results?.exploration_count > 0) {
+  console.log(`✅ Exploration results aggregated: ${pkg.exploration_results.exploration_count} angles`);
+}
 ```
 
 ## Parameter Reference
@@ -141,11 +319,13 @@ Refer to `context-search-agent.md` Phase 3.7 for complete `context-package.json`
 
 **Key Sections**:
 - **metadata**: Session info, keywords, complexity, tech stack
-- **project_context**: Architecture patterns, conventions, tech stack (populated from `project.json` overview)
+- **project_context**: Architecture patterns, conventions, tech stack (populated from `project-tech.json`)
+- **project_guidelines**: Conventions, constraints, quality rules, learnings (populated from `project-guidelines.json`)
 - **assets**: Categorized files with relevance scores (documentation, source_code, config, tests)
 - **dependencies**: Internal and external dependency graphs
 - **brainstorm_artifacts**: Brainstorm documents with full content (if exists)
 - **conflict_detection**: Risk assessment with mitigation strategies and historical conflicts
+- **exploration_results**: Aggregated exploration insights (from parallel explore phase)
 
 ## Historical Archive Analysis
 
@@ -255,7 +435,7 @@ if (historicalConflicts.length > 0 && currentRisk === "low") {
 ## Notes
 
 - **Detection-first**: Always check for existing package before invoking agent
-- **Project.json integration**: Agent reads `.workflow/project.json` as primary source for project context, avoiding redundant analysis
-- **Agent autonomy**: Agent handles all discovery logic per `.claude/agents/context-search-agent.md`
+- **Dual project file integration**: Agent reads both `.workflow/project-tech.json` (tech analysis) and `.workflow/project-guidelines.json` (user constraints) as primary sources
+- **Guidelines injection**: Project guidelines are included in context-package to ensure task generation respects user-defined constraints
 - **No redundancy**: This command is a thin orchestrator, all logic in agent
 - **Plan-specific**: Use this for implementation planning; brainstorm mode uses direct agent call

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-agent.md

@@ -1,256 +1,563 @@
 ---
 name: task-generate-agent
-description: Autonomous task generation using action-planning-agent with discovery and output phases for workflow planning
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--cli-execute]"
+description: Generate implementation plan documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) using action-planning-agent - produces planning artifacts, does NOT execute code implementation
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-agent --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
 ---
 
-# Autonomous Task Generation Command
+# Generate Implementation Plan Command
 
 ## Overview
-Autonomous task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation. Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution modes.
+Generate implementation planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) using action-planning-agent. This command produces **planning artifacts only** - it does NOT execute code implementation. Actual code implementation requires separate execution command (e.g., /workflow:execute).
 
 ## Core Philosophy
-- **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
-- **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
+- **Planning Only**: Generate planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) - does NOT implement code
+- **Agent-Driven Document Generation**: Delegate plan generation to action-planning-agent
+- **N+1 Parallel Planning**: Auto-detect multi-module projects, enable parallel planning (2+1 or 3+1 mode)
+- **Progressive Loading**: Load context incrementally (Core → Selective → On-Demand) due to analysis.md file size
 - **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
+- **Smart Selection**: Load synthesis_output OR guidance + relevant role analyses, NOT all role analyses
 - **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and research
-- **Pre-Selected Templates**: Command selects correct template based on `--cli-execute` flag **before** invoking agent
-- **Agent Simplicity**: Agent receives pre-selected template and focuses only on content generation
 - **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root (e.g., `./src/module`)
 
-## Execution Lifecycle
+## Execution Process
 
-### Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading
-**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session
+   └─ Validation: session_id REQUIRED
 
-**Agent Context Package**:
+Phase 0: User Configuration (Interactive)
+   ├─ Question 1: Supplementary materials/guidelines?
+   ├─ Question 2: Execution method preference (Agent/CLI/Hybrid)
+   ├─ Question 3: CLI tool preference (if CLI selected)
+   └─ Store: userConfig for agent prompt
+
+Phase 1: Context Preparation & Module Detection (Command)
+   ├─ Assemble session paths (metadata, context package, output dirs)
+   ├─ Provide metadata (session_id, execution_mode, mcp_capabilities)
+   ├─ Auto-detect modules from context-package + directory structure
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ modules.length == 1 → Single Agent Mode (Phase 2A)
+      └─ modules.length >= 2 → Parallel Mode (Phase 2B + Phase 3)
+
+Phase 2A: Single Agent Planning (Original Flow)
+   ├─ Load context package (progressive loading strategy)
+   ├─ Generate Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+   ├─ Create IMPL_PLAN.md
+   └─ Generate TODO_LIST.md
+
+Phase 2B: N Parallel Planning (Multi-Module)
+   ├─ Launch N action-planning-agents simultaneously (one per module)
+   ├─ Each agent generates module-scoped tasks (IMPL-{prefix}{seq}.json)
+   ├─ Task ID format: IMPL-A1, IMPL-A2... / IMPL-B1, IMPL-B2...
+   └─ Each module limited to ≤9 tasks
+
+Phase 3: Integration (+1 Coordinator, Multi-Module Only)
+   ├─ Collect all module task JSONs
+   ├─ Resolve cross-module dependencies (CROSS::{module}::{pattern} → actual ID)
+   ├─ Generate unified IMPL_PLAN.md (grouped by module)
+   └─ Generate TODO_LIST.md (hierarchical: module → tasks)
+```
+
+## Document Generation Lifecycle
+
+### Phase 0: User Configuration (Interactive)
+
+**Purpose**: Collect user preferences before task generation to ensure generated tasks match execution expectations.
+
+**User Questions**:
 ```javascript
-{
-  "session_id": "WFS-[session-id]",
-  "execution_mode": "agent-mode" | "cli-execute-mode",  // Determined by flag
-  "task_json_template_path": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt"
-                           | "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt",
-  // Path selected by command based on --cli-execute flag, agent reads it
-  "session_metadata": {
-    // If in memory: use cached content
-    // Else: Load from .workflow/active//{session-id}/workflow-session.json
-  },
-  "brainstorm_artifacts": {
-    // Loaded from context-package.json → brainstorm_artifacts section
-    "role_analyses": [
-      {
-        "role": "system-architect",
-        "files": [{"path": "...", "type": "primary|supplementary"}]
-      }
-    ],
-    "guidance_specification": {"path": "...", "exists": true},
-    "synthesis_output": {"path": "...", "exists": true},
-    "conflict_resolution": {"path": "...", "exists": true}  // if conflict_risk >= medium
-  },
-  "context_package_path": ".workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json",
-  "context_package": {
-    // If in memory: use cached content
-    // Else: Load from .workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
-  },
-  "mcp_capabilities": {
-    "code_index": true,
-    "exa_code": true,
-    "exa_web": true
-  }
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "Do you have supplementary materials or guidelines to include?",
+      header: "Materials",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "No additional materials", description: "Use existing context only" },
+        { label: "Provide file paths", description: "I'll specify paths to include" },
+        { label: "Provide inline content", description: "I'll paste content directly" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Select execution method for generated tasks:",
+      header: "Execution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Agent (Recommended)", description: "Claude agent executes tasks directly" },
+        { label: "Hybrid", description: "Agent orchestrates, calls CLI for complex steps" },
+        { label: "CLI Only", description: "All execution via CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen)" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "If using CLI, which tool do you prefer?",
+      header: "CLI Tool",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Codex (Recommended)", description: "Best for implementation tasks" },
+        { label: "Gemini", description: "Best for analysis and large context" },
+        { label: "Qwen", description: "Alternative analysis tool" },
+        { label: "Auto", description: "Let agent decide per-task" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+**Handle Materials Response**:
+```javascript
+if (userConfig.materials === "Provide file paths") {
+  // Follow-up question for file paths
+  const pathsResponse = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [{
+      question: "Enter file paths to include (comma-separated or one per line):",
+      header: "Paths",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Enter paths", description: "Provide paths in text input" }
+      ]
+    }]
+  })
+  userConfig.supplementaryPaths = parseUserPaths(pathsResponse)
 }
 ```
 
-**Discovery Actions**:
-1. **Load Session Context** (if not in memory)
-   ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("workflow-session.json")) {
-     Read(.workflow/active//{session-id}/workflow-session.json)
-   }
-   ```
-
-2. **Load Context Package** (if not in memory)
-   ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("context-package.json")) {
-     Read(.workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json)
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Extract & Load Role Analyses** (from context-package.json)
-   ```javascript
-   // Extract role analysis paths from context package
-   const roleAnalysisPaths = contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses
-     .flatMap(role => role.files.map(f => f.path));
-
-   // Load each role analysis file
-   roleAnalysisPaths.forEach(path => Read(path));
-   ```
-
-4. **Load Conflict Resolution** (from context-package.json, if exists)
-   ```javascript
-   if (contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution?.exists) {
-     Read(contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
-   }
-   ```
-
-5. **Code Analysis with Native Tools** (optional - enhance understanding)
-   ```bash
-   # Find relevant files for task context
-   find . -name "*auth*" -type f
-   rg "authentication|oauth" -g "*.ts"
-   ```
-
-6. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather best practices)
-   ```javascript
-   // Get external examples for implementation
-   mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
-     query="TypeScript JWT authentication best practices",
-     tokensNum="dynamic"
-   )
-   ```
-
-### Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
-
-**Pre-Agent Template Selection** (Command decides path before invoking agent):
+**Build userConfig**:
 ```javascript
-// Command checks flag and selects template PATH (not content)
-const templatePath = hasCliExecuteFlag
-  ? "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt"
-  : "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt";
+const userConfig = {
+  supplementaryMaterials: {
+    type: "none|paths|inline",
+    content: [...],  // Parsed paths or inline content
+  },
+  executionMethod: "agent|hybrid|cli",
+  preferredCliTool: "codex|gemini|qwen|auto",
+  enableResume: true  // Always enable resume for CLI executions
+}
 ```
 
+**Pass to Agent**: Include `userConfig` in agent prompt for Phase 2A/2B.
+
+### Phase 1: Context Preparation & Module Detection (Command Responsibility)
+
+**Command prepares session paths, metadata, and detects module structure.**
+
+**Session Path Structure**:
+```
+.workflow/active/WFS-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json          # Session metadata
+├── .process/
+│   └── context-package.json       # Context package with artifact catalog
+├── .task/                         # Output: Task JSON files
+│   ├── IMPL-A1.json               # Multi-module: prefixed by module
+│   ├── IMPL-A2.json
+│   ├── IMPL-B1.json
+│   └── ...
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                   # Output: Implementation plan (grouped by module)
+└── TODO_LIST.md                   # Output: TODO list (hierarchical)
+```
+
+**Command Preparation**:
+1. **Assemble Session Paths** for agent prompt:
+   - `session_metadata_path`
+   - `context_package_path`
+   - Output directory paths
+
+2. **Provide Metadata** (simple values):
+   - `session_id`
+   - `mcp_capabilities` (available MCP tools)
+
+3. **Auto Module Detection** (determines single vs parallel mode):
+   ```javascript
+   function autoDetectModules(contextPackage, projectRoot) {
+     // === Complexity Gate: Only parallelize for High complexity ===
+     const complexity = contextPackage.metadata?.complexity || 'Medium';
+     if (complexity !== 'High') {
+       // Force single agent mode for Low/Medium complexity
+       // This maximizes agent context reuse for related tasks
+       return [{ name: 'main', prefix: '', paths: ['.'] }];
+     }
+
+     // Priority 1: Explicit frontend/backend separation
+     if (exists('src/frontend') && exists('src/backend')) {
+       return [
+         { name: 'frontend', prefix: 'A', paths: ['src/frontend'] },
+         { name: 'backend', prefix: 'B', paths: ['src/backend'] }
+       ];
+     }
+
+     // Priority 2: Monorepo structure
+     if (exists('packages/*') || exists('apps/*')) {
+       return detectMonorepoModules();  // Returns 2-3 main packages
+     }
+
+     // Priority 3: Context-package dependency clustering
+     const modules = clusterByDependencies(contextPackage.dependencies?.internal);
+     if (modules.length >= 2) return modules.slice(0, 3);
+
+     // Default: Single module (original flow)
+     return [{ name: 'main', prefix: '', paths: ['.'] }];
+   }
+   ```
+
+**Decision Logic**:
+- `complexity !== 'High'` → Force Phase 2A (Single Agent, maximize context reuse)
+- `modules.length == 1` → Phase 2A (Single Agent, original flow)
+- `modules.length >= 2 && complexity == 'High'` → Phase 2B + Phase 3 (N+1 Parallel)
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is now determined semantically by action-planning-agent based on user's task description, not by flags.
+
+### Phase 2A: Single Agent Planning (Original Flow)
+
+**Condition**: `modules.length == 1` (no multi-module detected)
+
+**Purpose**: Generate IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, and TODO_LIST.md - planning documents only, NOT code implementation.
+
 **Agent Invocation**:
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
-  description="Generate task JSON and implementation plan",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Generate planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md)",
   prompt=`
-## Execution Context
+## TASK OBJECTIVE
+Generate implementation planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) for workflow session
 
-**Session ID**: WFS-{session-id}
-**Execution Mode**: {agent-mode | cli-execute-mode}
-**Task JSON Template Path**: {template_path}
+IMPORTANT: This is PLANNING ONLY - you are generating planning documents, NOT implementing code.
 
-## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
+CRITICAL: Follow the progressive loading strategy defined in agent specification (load analysis.md files incrementally due to file size)
 
-### Session Metadata
-{session_metadata_content}
+## SESSION PATHS
+Input:
+  - Session Metadata: .workflow/active/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
+  - Context Package: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
 
-### Role Analyses (Enhanced by Synthesis)
-{role_analyses_content}
-- Includes requirements, design specs, enhancements, and clarifications from synthesis phase
+Output:
+  - Task Dir: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.task/
+  - IMPL_PLAN: .workflow/active/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
+  - TODO_LIST: .workflow/active/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md
 
-### Artifacts Inventory
-- **Guidance Specification**: {guidance_spec_path}
-- **Role Analyses**: {role_analyses_list}
+## CONTEXT METADATA
+Session ID: {session-id}
+MCP Capabilities: {exa_code, exa_web, code_index}
 
-### Context Package
-{context_package_summary}
-- Includes conflict_risk assessment
+## USER CONFIGURATION (from Phase 0)
+Execution Method: ${userConfig.executionMethod}  // agent|hybrid|cli
+Preferred CLI Tool: ${userConfig.preferredCliTool}  // codex|gemini|qwen|auto
+Supplementary Materials: ${userConfig.supplementaryMaterials}
 
-### Conflict Resolution (Conditional)
-If conflict_risk was medium/high, modifications have been applied to:
-- **guidance-specification.md**: Design decisions updated to resolve conflicts
-- **Role analyses (*.md)**: Recommendations adjusted for compatibility
-- **context-package.json**: Marked as "resolved" with conflict IDs
-- NO separate CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file (conflicts resolved in-place)
+## CLI TOOL SELECTION
+Based on userConfig.executionMethod:
+- "agent": No command field in implementation_approach steps
+- "hybrid": Add command field to complex steps only (agent handles simple steps)
+- "cli": Add command field to ALL implementation_approach steps
 
-### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
-**Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
-**External Research**: {mcp_exa_research_results}
+CLI Resume Support (MANDATORY for all CLI commands):
+- Use --resume parameter to continue from previous task execution
+- Read previous task's cliExecutionId from session state
+- Format: ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume ${previousCliId} --tool ${tool} --mode write
 
-## Phase 2: Document Generation Task
+## EXPLORATION CONTEXT (from context-package.exploration_results)
+- Load exploration_results from context-package.json
+- Use aggregated_insights.critical_files for focus_paths generation
+- Apply aggregated_insights.constraints to acceptance criteria
+- Reference aggregated_insights.all_patterns for implementation approach
+- Use aggregated_insights.all_integration_points for precise modification locations
+- Use conflict_indicators for risk-aware task sequencing
 
-**Agent Configuration Reference**: All task generation rules, quantification requirements, quality standards, and execution details are defined in action-planning-agent.
+## CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONTEXT (if exists)
+- Check context-package.conflict_detection.resolution_file for conflict-resolution.json path
+- If exists, load .process/conflict-resolution.json:
+  - Apply planning_constraints as task constraints (for brainstorm-less workflows)
+  - Reference resolved_conflicts for implementation approach alignment
+  - Handle custom_conflicts with explicit task notes
 
-Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
-- Task Decomposition Standards
-- Quantification Requirements (MANDATORY)
-- 5-Field Task JSON Schema
-- IMPL_PLAN.md Structure
-- TODO_LIST.md Format
-- Execution Flow & Quality Validation
+## EXPECTED DELIVERABLES
+1. Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+   - 6-field schema (id, title, status, context_package_path, meta, context, flow_control)
+   - Quantified requirements with explicit counts
+   - Artifacts integration from context package
+   - **focus_paths enhanced with exploration critical_files**
+   - Flow control with pre_analysis steps (include exploration integration_points analysis)
+   - **CLI Execution IDs and strategies (MANDATORY)**
 
-### Required Outputs Summary
+2. Implementation Plan (IMPL_PLAN.md)
+   - Context analysis and artifact references
+   - Task breakdown and execution strategy
+   - Complete structure per agent definition
 
-#### 1. Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
-- **Location**: `.workflow/active//{session-id}/.task/`
-- **Template**: Read from `{template_path}` (pre-selected by command based on `--cli-execute` flag)
-- **Schema**: 5-field structure (id, title, status, meta, context, flow_control) with artifacts integration
-- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Task JSON Generation
+3. TODO List (TODO_LIST.md)
+   - Hierarchical structure (containers, pending, completed markers)
+   - Links to task JSONs and summaries
+   - Matches task JSON hierarchy
 
-#### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md
-- **Location**: `.workflow/active//{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md`
-- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/impl-plan-template.txt`
-- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Implementation Plan Creation
+## CLI EXECUTION ID REQUIREMENTS (MANDATORY)
+Each task JSON MUST include:
+- **cli_execution_id**: Unique ID for CLI execution (format: `{session_id}-{task_id}`)
+- **cli_execution**: Strategy object based on depends_on:
+  - No deps → `{ "strategy": "new" }`
+  - 1 dep (single child) → `{ "strategy": "resume", "resume_from": "parent-cli-id" }`
+  - 1 dep (multiple children) → `{ "strategy": "fork", "resume_from": "parent-cli-id" }`
+  - N deps → `{ "strategy": "merge_fork", "merge_from": ["id1", "id2", ...] }`
 
-#### 3. TODO_LIST.md
-- **Location**: `.workflow/active//{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
-- **Format**: Hierarchical task list with status indicators (▸, [ ], [x]) and JSON links
-- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § TODO List Generation
+**CLI Execution Strategy Rules**:
+1. **new**: Task has no dependencies - starts fresh CLI conversation
+2. **resume**: Task has 1 parent AND that parent has only this child - continues same conversation
+3. **fork**: Task has 1 parent BUT parent has multiple children - creates new branch with parent context
+4. **merge_fork**: Task has multiple parents - merges all parent contexts into new conversation
 
-### Agent Execution Summary
+**Execution Command Patterns**:
+- new: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --tool [tool] --mode write --id [cli_execution_id]`
+- resume: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume [resume_from] --tool [tool] --mode write`
+- fork: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume [resume_from] --id [cli_execution_id] --tool [tool] --mode write`
+- merge_fork: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume [merge_from.join(',')] --id [cli_execution_id] --tool [tool] --mode write`
 
-**Key Steps** (Detailed instructions in action-planning-agent.md):
-1. Load task JSON template from provided path
-2. Extract and decompose tasks with quantification
-3. Generate task JSON files enforcing quantification requirements
-4. Create IMPL_PLAN.md using template
-5. Generate TODO_LIST.md matching task JSONs
-6. Update session state
+## QUALITY STANDARDS
+Hard Constraints:
+  - Task count <= 18 (hard limit - request re-scope if exceeded)
+  - All requirements quantified (explicit counts and enumerated lists)
+  - Acceptance criteria measurable (include verification commands)
+  - Artifact references mapped from context package
+  - All documents follow agent-defined structure
 
-**Quality Gates** (Full checklist in action-planning-agent.md):
-- ✓ Quantification requirements enforced (explicit counts, measurable acceptance, exact targets)
-- ✓ Task count ≤10 (hard limit)
-- ✓ Artifact references mapped correctly
-- ✓ MCP tool integration added
-- ✓ Documents follow template structure
-
-## Output
-
-Generate all three documents and report completion status:
-- Task JSON files created: N files
-- Artifacts integrated: synthesis-spec, guidance-specification, N role analyses
+## SUCCESS CRITERIA
+- All planning documents generated successfully:
+  - Task JSONs valid and saved to .task/ directory
+  - IMPL_PLAN.md created with complete structure
+  - TODO_LIST.md generated matching task JSONs
+- Return completion status with document count and task breakdown summary
 `
 )
 ```
 
+### Phase 2B: N Parallel Planning (Multi-Module)
 
-### Agent Context Passing
+**Condition**: `modules.length >= 2` (multi-module detected)
 
-**Memory-Aware Context Assembly**:
+**Purpose**: Launch N action-planning-agents simultaneously, one per module, for parallel task JSON generation.
+
+**Note**: Phase 2B agents generate Task JSONs ONLY. IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md are generated by Phase 3 Coordinator.
+
+**Parallel Agent Invocation**:
 ```javascript
-// Assemble context package for agent
-const agentContext = {
-  session_id: "WFS-[id]",
+// Launch N agents in parallel (one per module)
+const planningTasks = modules.map(module =>
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,
+    description=`Generate ${module.name} module task JSONs`,
+    prompt=`
+## TASK OBJECTIVE
+Generate task JSON files for ${module.name} module within workflow session
 
-  // Use memory if available, else load
-  session_metadata: memory.has("workflow-session.json")
-    ? memory.get("workflow-session.json")
-    : Read(.workflow/active/WFS-[id]/workflow-session.json),
+IMPORTANT: This is PLANNING ONLY - generate task JSONs, NOT implementing code.
+IMPORTANT: Generate Task JSONs ONLY. IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md by Phase 3 Coordinator.
 
-  context_package_path: ".workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json",
+CRITICAL: Follow the progressive loading strategy defined in agent specification (load analysis.md files incrementally due to file size)
 
-  context_package: memory.has("context-package.json")
-    ? memory.get("context-package.json")
-    : Read(".workflow/active/WFS-[id]/.process/context-package.json"),
+## MODULE SCOPE
+- Module: ${module.name} (${module.type})
+- Focus Paths: ${module.paths.join(', ')}
+- Task ID Prefix: IMPL-${module.prefix}
+- Task Limit: ≤9 tasks (hard limit for this module)
+- Other Modules: ${otherModules.join(', ')} (reference only, do NOT generate tasks for them)
 
-  // Extract brainstorm artifacts from context package
-  brainstorm_artifacts: extractBrainstormArtifacts(context_package),
+## SESSION PATHS
+Input:
+  - Session Metadata: .workflow/active/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
+  - Context Package: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
 
-  // Load role analyses using paths from context package
-  role_analyses: brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses
-    .flatMap(role => role.files)
-    .map(file => Read(file.path)),
+Output:
+  - Task Dir: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.task/
 
-  // Load conflict resolution if exists (from context package)
-  conflict_resolution: brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution?.exists
-    ? Read(brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
-    : null,
+## CONTEXT METADATA
+Session ID: {session-id}
+MCP Capabilities: {exa_code, exa_web, code_index}
 
-  // Optional MCP enhancements
-  mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
+## USER CONFIGURATION (from Phase 0)
+Execution Method: ${userConfig.executionMethod}  // agent|hybrid|cli
+Preferred CLI Tool: ${userConfig.preferredCliTool}  // codex|gemini|qwen|auto
+Supplementary Materials: ${userConfig.supplementaryMaterials}
+
+## CLI TOOL SELECTION
+Based on userConfig.executionMethod:
+- "agent": No command field in implementation_approach steps
+- "hybrid": Add command field to complex steps only (agent handles simple steps)
+- "cli": Add command field to ALL implementation_approach steps
+
+CLI Resume Support (MANDATORY for all CLI commands):
+- Use --resume parameter to continue from previous task execution
+- Read previous task's cliExecutionId from session state
+- Format: ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume ${previousCliId} --tool ${tool} --mode write
+
+## EXPLORATION CONTEXT (from context-package.exploration_results)
+- Load exploration_results from context-package.json
+- Filter for ${module.name} module: Use aggregated_insights.critical_files matching ${module.paths.join(', ')}
+- Apply module-relevant constraints from aggregated_insights.constraints
+- Reference aggregated_insights.all_patterns applicable to ${module.name}
+- Use aggregated_insights.all_integration_points for precise modification locations within module scope
+- Use conflict_indicators for risk-aware task sequencing
+
+## CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONTEXT (if exists)
+- Check context-package.conflict_detection.resolution_file for conflict-resolution.json path
+- If exists, load .process/conflict-resolution.json:
+  - Apply planning_constraints relevant to ${module.name} as task constraints
+  - Reference resolved_conflicts affecting ${module.name} for implementation approach alignment
+  - Handle custom_conflicts with explicit task notes
+
+## CROSS-MODULE DEPENDENCIES
+- For dependencies ON other modules: Use placeholder depends_on: ["CROSS::{module}::{pattern}"]
+- Example: depends_on: ["CROSS::B::api-endpoint"] (this module depends on B's api-endpoint task)
+- Phase 3 Coordinator resolves to actual task IDs
+- For dependencies FROM other modules: Document in task context as "provides_for" annotation
+
+## EXPECTED DELIVERABLES
+Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-${module.prefix}*.json):
+  - 6-field schema (id, title, status, context_package_path, meta, context, flow_control)
+  - Task ID format: IMPL-${module.prefix}1, IMPL-${module.prefix}2, ...
+  - Quantified requirements with explicit counts
+  - Artifacts integration from context package (filtered for ${module.name})
+  - **focus_paths enhanced with exploration critical_files (module-scoped)**
+  - Flow control with pre_analysis steps (include exploration integration_points analysis)
+  - **CLI Execution IDs and strategies (MANDATORY)**
+  - Focus ONLY on ${module.name} module scope
+
+## CLI EXECUTION ID REQUIREMENTS (MANDATORY)
+Each task JSON MUST include:
+- **cli_execution_id**: Unique ID for CLI execution (format: `{session_id}-IMPL-${module.prefix}{seq}`)
+- **cli_execution**: Strategy object based on depends_on:
+  - No deps → `{ "strategy": "new" }`
+  - 1 dep (single child) → `{ "strategy": "resume", "resume_from": "parent-cli-id" }`
+  - 1 dep (multiple children) → `{ "strategy": "fork", "resume_from": "parent-cli-id" }`
+  - N deps → `{ "strategy": "merge_fork", "merge_from": ["id1", "id2", ...] }`
+  - Cross-module dep → `{ "strategy": "cross_module_fork", "resume_from": "CROSS::{module}::{pattern}" }`
+
+**CLI Execution Strategy Rules**:
+1. **new**: Task has no dependencies - starts fresh CLI conversation
+2. **resume**: Task has 1 parent AND that parent has only this child - continues same conversation
+3. **fork**: Task has 1 parent BUT parent has multiple children - creates new branch with parent context
+4. **merge_fork**: Task has multiple parents - merges all parent contexts into new conversation
+5. **cross_module_fork**: Task depends on task from another module - Phase 3 resolves placeholder
+
+**Execution Command Patterns**:
+- new: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --tool [tool] --mode write --id [cli_execution_id]`
+- resume: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume [resume_from] --tool [tool] --mode write`
+- fork: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume [resume_from] --id [cli_execution_id] --tool [tool] --mode write`
+- merge_fork: `ccw cli -p "[prompt]" --resume [merge_from.join(',')] --id [cli_execution_id] --tool [tool] --mode write`
+- cross_module_fork: (Phase 3 resolves placeholder, then uses fork pattern)
+
+## QUALITY STANDARDS
+Hard Constraints:
+  - Task count <= 9 for this module (hard limit - coordinate with Phase 3 if exceeded)
+  - All requirements quantified (explicit counts and enumerated lists)
+  - Acceptance criteria measurable (include verification commands)
+  - Artifact references mapped from context package (module-scoped filter)
+  - Focus paths use absolute paths or clear relative paths from project root
+  - Cross-module dependencies use CROSS:: placeholder format
+
+## SUCCESS CRITERIA
+- Task JSONs saved to .task/ with IMPL-${module.prefix}* naming
+- All task JSONs include cli_execution_id and cli_execution strategy
+- Cross-module dependencies use CROSS:: placeholder format consistently
+- Focus paths scoped to ${module.paths.join(', ')} only
+- Return: task count, task IDs, dependency summary (internal + cross-module)
+    `
+  )
+);
+
+// Execute all in parallel
+await Promise.all(planningTasks);
+```
+
+**Output Structure** (direct to .task/):
+```
+.task/
+├── IMPL-A1.json      # Module A (e.g., frontend)
+├── IMPL-A2.json
+├── IMPL-B1.json      # Module B (e.g., backend)
+├── IMPL-B2.json
+└── IMPL-C1.json      # Module C (e.g., shared)
+```
+
+**Task ID Naming**:
+- Format: `IMPL-{prefix}{seq}.json`
+- Prefix: A, B, C... (assigned by detection order)
+- Sequence: 1, 2, 3... (per-module increment)
+
+### Phase 3: Integration (+1 Coordinator Agent, Multi-Module Only)
+
+**Condition**: Only executed when `modules.length >= 2`
+
+**Purpose**: Collect all module tasks, resolve cross-module dependencies, generate unified IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md documents.
+
+**Coordinator Agent Invocation**:
+```javascript
+// Wait for all Phase 2B agents to complete
+const moduleResults = await Promise.all(planningTasks);
+
+// Launch +1 Coordinator Agent
+Task(
+  subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Integrate module tasks and generate unified documents",
+  prompt=`
+## TASK OBJECTIVE
+Integrate all module task JSONs, resolve cross-module dependencies, and generate unified IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md
+
+IMPORTANT: This is INTEGRATION ONLY - consolidate existing task JSONs, NOT creating new tasks.
+
+## SESSION PATHS
+Input:
+  - Session Metadata: .workflow/active/{session-id}/workflow-session.json
+  - Context Package: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.process/context-package.json
+  - Task JSONs: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.task/IMPL-*.json (from Phase 2B)
+Output:
+  - Updated Task JSONs: .workflow/active/{session-id}/.task/IMPL-*.json (resolved dependencies)
+  - IMPL_PLAN: .workflow/active/{session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
+  - TODO_LIST: .workflow/active/{session-id}/TODO_LIST.md
+
+## CONTEXT METADATA
+Session ID: {session-id}
+Modules: ${modules.map(m => m.name + '(' + m.prefix + ')').join(', ')}
+Module Count: ${modules.length}
+
+## INTEGRATION STEPS
+1. Collect all .task/IMPL-*.json, group by module prefix
+2. Resolve CROSS:: dependencies → actual task IDs, update task JSONs
+3. Generate IMPL_PLAN.md (multi-module format per agent specification)
+4. Generate TODO_LIST.md (hierarchical format per agent specification)
+
+## CROSS-MODULE DEPENDENCY RESOLUTION
+- Pattern: CROSS::{module}::{pattern} → IMPL-{module}* matching title/context
+- Example: CROSS::B::api-endpoint → IMPL-B1 (if B1 title contains "api-endpoint")
+- Log unresolved as warnings
+
+## EXPECTED DELIVERABLES
+1. Updated Task JSONs with resolved dependency IDs
+2. IMPL_PLAN.md - multi-module format with cross-dependency section
+3. TODO_LIST.md - hierarchical by module with cross-dependency section
+
+## SUCCESS CRITERIA
+- No CROSS:: placeholders remaining in task JSONs
+- IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md generated with multi-module structure
+- Return: task count, per-module breakdown, resolved dependency count
+  `
+)
+```
+
+**Dependency Resolution Algorithm**:
+```javascript
+function resolveCrossModuleDependency(placeholder, allTasks) {
+  const [, targetModule, pattern] = placeholder.match(/CROSS::(\w+)::(.+)/);
+  const candidates = allTasks.filter(t =>
+    t.id.startsWith(`IMPL-${targetModule}`) &&
+    (t.title.toLowerCase().includes(pattern.toLowerCase()) ||
+     t.context?.description?.toLowerCase().includes(pattern.toLowerCase()))
+  );
+  return candidates.length > 0
+    ? candidates.sort((a, b) => a.id.localeCompare(b.id))[0].id
+    : placeholder; // Keep for manual resolution
 }
 ```
+

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate-tdd.md

@@ -1,24 +1,23 @@
 ---
 name: task-generate-tdd
 description: Autonomous TDD task generation using action-planning-agent with Red-Green-Refactor cycles, test-first structure, and cycle validation
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--cli-execute]"
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
 ---
 
 # Autonomous TDD Task Generation Command
 
 ## Overview
-Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation. Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution modes. Generates complete Red-Green-Refactor cycles contained within each task.
+Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation. Generates complete Red-Green-Refactor cycles contained within each task.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 - **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
 - **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
 - **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
 - **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and research
-- **Pre-Selected Templates**: Command selects correct TDD template based on `--cli-execute` flag **before** invoking agent
-- **Agent Simplicity**: Agent receives pre-selected template and focuses only on content generation
+- **Semantic CLI Selection**: CLI tool usage determined from user's task description, not flags
+- **Agent Simplicity**: Agent generates content with semantic CLI detection
 - **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root (e.g., `./src/module`)
 - **TDD-First**: Every feature starts with a failing test (Red phase)
 - **Feature-Complete Tasks**: Each task contains complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle
@@ -30,11 +29,6 @@ Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent
 - **1 feature = 1 task** containing complete TDD cycle internally
 - Each task executes Red-Green-Refactor phases sequentially
 - Task count = Feature count (typically 5 features = 5 tasks)
-- **Benefits**:
-  - 70% reduction in task management overhead
-  - Continuous context per feature (no switching between TEST/IMPL/REFACTOR)
-  - Simpler dependency management
-  - Maintains TDD rigor through internal phase structure
 
 **Previous Approach** (Deprecated):
 - 1 feature = 3 separate tasks (TEST-N.M, IMPL-N.M, REFACTOR-N.M)
@@ -48,16 +42,40 @@ Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent
 - Different tech stacks or domains within feature
 
 ### Task Limits
-- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit for TDD workflows)
+- **Maximum 18 tasks** (hard limit for TDD workflows)
 - **Feature-based**: Complete functional units with internal TDD cycles
 - **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5 simple features) | Two-level (6-10 for complex features with sub-features)
-- **Re-scope**: If >10 tasks needed, break project into multiple TDD workflow sessions
+- **Re-scope**: If >18 tasks needed, break project into multiple TDD workflow sessions
 
 ### TDD Cycle Mapping
 - **Old approach**: 1 feature = 3 tasks (TEST-N.M, IMPL-N.M, REFACTOR-N.M)
 - **Current approach**: 1 feature = 1 task (IMPL-N with internal Red-Green-Refactor phases)
 - **Complex features**: 1 container (IMPL-N) + subtasks (IMPL-N.M) when necessary
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session
+   └─ Validation: session_id REQUIRED
+
+Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading (Memory-First)
+   ├─ Load session context (if not in memory)
+   ├─ Load context package (if not in memory)
+   ├─ Load test context package (if not in memory)
+   ├─ Extract & load role analyses from context package
+   ├─ Load conflict resolution (if exists)
+   └─ Optional: MCP external research
+
+Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
+   ├─ Pre-agent template selection (semantic CLI detection)
+   ├─ Invoke action-planning-agent
+   ├─ Generate TDD Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+   │  └─ Each task: complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle internally
+   ├─ Create IMPL_PLAN.md (TDD variant)
+   └─ Generate TODO_LIST.md with TDD phase indicators
+```
+
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
 ### Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading
@@ -67,11 +85,8 @@ Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent
 ```javascript
 {
   "session_id": "WFS-[session-id]",
-  "execution_mode": "agent-mode" | "cli-execute-mode",  // Determined by flag
-  "task_json_template_path": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt"
-                           | "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt",
-  // Path selected by command based on --cli-execute flag, agent reads it
   "workflow_type": "tdd",
+  // Note: CLI tool usage is determined semantically by action-planning-agent based on user's task description
   "session_metadata": {
     // If in memory: use cached content
     // Else: Load from .workflow/active//{session-id}/workflow-session.json
@@ -98,7 +113,7 @@ Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent
     // Existing test patterns and coverage analysis
   },
   "mcp_capabilities": {
-    "code_index": true,
+    "codex_lens": true,
     "exa_code": true,
     "exa_web": true
   }
@@ -137,9 +152,14 @@ Autonomous TDD task JSON and IMPL_PLAN.md generation using action-planning-agent
    roleAnalysisPaths.forEach(path => Read(path));
    ```
 
-5. **Load Conflict Resolution** (from context-package.json, if exists)
+5. **Load Conflict Resolution** (from conflict-resolution.json, if exists)
    ```javascript
-   if (contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution?.exists) {
+   // Check for new conflict-resolution.json format
+   if (contextPackage.conflict_detection?.resolution_file) {
+     Read(contextPackage.conflict_detection.resolution_file)  // .process/conflict-resolution.json
+   }
+   // Fallback: legacy brainstorm_artifacts path
+   else if (contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts?.conflict_resolution?.exists) {
      Read(contextPackage.brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
    }
    ```
@@ -174,14 +194,14 @@ const templatePath = hasCliExecuteFlag
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
   description="Generate TDD task JSON and implementation plan",
   prompt=`
 ## Execution Context
 
 **Session ID**: WFS-{session-id}
 **Workflow Type**: TDD
-**Execution Mode**: {agent-mode | cli-execute-mode}
-**Task JSON Template Path**: {template_path}
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description
 
 ## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
 
@@ -209,7 +229,7 @@ If conflict_risk was medium/high, modifications have been applied to:
 - **guidance-specification.md**: Design decisions updated to resolve conflicts
 - **Role analyses (*.md)**: Recommendations adjusted for compatibility
 - **context-package.json**: Marked as "resolved" with conflict IDs
-- NO separate CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md file (conflicts resolved in-place)
+- Conflict resolution results stored in conflict-resolution.json
 
 ### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
 **Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
@@ -219,15 +239,6 @@ If conflict_risk was medium/high, modifications have been applied to:
 
 **Agent Configuration Reference**: All TDD task generation rules, quantification requirements, Red-Green-Refactor cycle structure, quality standards, and execution details are defined in action-planning-agent.
 
-Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
-- TDD Task Decomposition Standards
-- Red-Green-Refactor Cycle Requirements
-- Quantification Requirements (MANDATORY)
-- 5-Field Task JSON Schema
-- IMPL_PLAN.md Structure (TDD variant)
-- TODO_LIST.md Format
-- TDD Execution Flow & Quality Validation
-
 ### TDD-Specific Requirements Summary
 
 #### Task Structure Philosophy
@@ -235,7 +246,7 @@ Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
 - Each task executes Red-Green-Refactor phases sequentially
 - Task count = Feature count (typically 5 features = 5 tasks)
 - Subtasks only when complexity >2500 lines or >6 files per cycle
-- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit for TDD workflows)
+- **Maximum 18 tasks** (hard limit for TDD workflows)
 
 #### TDD Cycle Mapping
 - **Simple features**: IMPL-N with internal Red-Green-Refactor phases
@@ -246,16 +257,15 @@ Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
 
 ##### 1. TDD Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
 - **Location**: `.workflow/active//{session-id}/.task/`
-- **Template**: Read from `{template_path}` (pre-selected by command based on `--cli-execute` flag)
 - **Schema**: 5-field structure with TDD-specific metadata
   - `meta.tdd_workflow`: true (REQUIRED)
   - `meta.max_iterations`: 3 (Green phase test-fix cycle limit)
-  - `meta.use_codex`: false (manual fixes by default)
   - `context.tdd_cycles`: Array with quantified test cases and coverage
   - `flow_control.implementation_approach`: Exactly 3 steps with `tdd_phase` field
     1. Red Phase (`tdd_phase: "red"`): Write failing tests
     2. Green Phase (`tdd_phase: "green"`): Implement to pass tests
     3. Refactor Phase (`tdd_phase: "refactor"`): Improve code quality
+  - CLI tool usage determined semantically (add `command` field when user requests CLI execution)
 - **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § TDD Task JSON Generation
 
 ##### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md (TDD Variant)
@@ -305,7 +315,7 @@ Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
 
 **Quality Gates** (Full checklist in action-planning-agent.md):
 - ✓ Quantification requirements enforced (explicit counts, measurable acceptance, exact targets)
-- ✓ Task count ≤10 (hard limit)
+- ✓ Task count ≤18 (hard limit)
 - ✓ Each task has meta.tdd_workflow: true
 - ✓ Each task has exactly 3 implementation steps with tdd_phase field
 - ✓ Green phase includes test-fix cycle logic
@@ -320,7 +330,7 @@ Generate all three documents and report completion status:
 - TDD cycles configured: N cycles with quantified test cases
 - Artifacts integrated: synthesis-spec, guidance-specification, N role analyses
 - Test context integrated: existing patterns and coverage
-- MCP enhancements: code-index, exa-research
+- MCP enhancements: CodexLens, exa-research
 - Session ready for TDD execution: /workflow:execute
 `
 )
@@ -360,10 +370,12 @@ const agentContext = {
     .flatMap(role => role.files)
     .map(file => Read(file.path)),
 
-  // Load conflict resolution if exists (from context package)
-  conflict_resolution: brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution?.exists
-    ? Read(brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
-    : null,
+  // Load conflict resolution if exists (prefer new JSON format)
+  conflict_resolution: context_package.conflict_detection?.resolution_file
+    ? Read(context_package.conflict_detection.resolution_file)  // .process/conflict-resolution.json
+    : (brainstorm_artifacts?.conflict_resolution?.exists
+        ? Read(brainstorm_artifacts.conflict_resolution.path)
+        : null),
 
   // Optional MCP enhancements
   mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
@@ -395,7 +407,7 @@ This section provides quick reference for TDD task JSON structure. For complete
 │   ├── IMPL-3.2.json                # Complex feature subtask (if needed)
 │   └── ...
 └── .process/
-    ├── CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md       # Conflict resolution strategies (if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
+    ├── conflict-resolution.json     # Conflict resolution results (if conflict_risk ≥ medium)
     ├── test-context-package.json    # Test coverage analysis
     ├── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather
     ├── context_package_path         # Path to smart context package
@@ -456,16 +468,14 @@ This section provides quick reference for TDD task JSON structure. For complete
 
 **Basic Usage**:
 ```bash
-# Agent mode (default, autonomous execution)
+# Standard execution
 /workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth
 
-# CLI tool mode (use Gemini/Qwen for generation)
-/workflow:tools:task-generate-tdd --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
+# With semantic CLI request (include in task description)
+# e.g., "Generate TDD tasks for auth module, use Codex for implementation"
 ```
 
-**Execution Modes**:
-- **Agent mode** (default): Uses `action-planning-agent` with agent-mode task template
-- **CLI mode** (`--cli-execute`): Uses Gemini/Qwen with cli-mode task template
+**CLI Tool Selection**: Determined semantically from user's task description. Include "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen" in your request for CLI execution.
 
 **Output**:
 - TDD task JSON files in `.task/` directory (IMPL-N.json format)
@@ -494,18 +504,14 @@ IMPL (Green phase) tasks include automatic test-fix cycle:
 3. **Success Path**: Tests pass → Complete task
 4. **Failure Path**: Tests fail → Enter iterative fix cycle:
    - **Gemini Diagnosis**: Analyze failures with bug-fix template
-   - **Fix Application**: Manual (default) or Codex (if meta.use_codex=true)
+   - **Fix Application**: Agent (default) or CLI (if `command` field present)
    - **Retest**: Verify fix resolves failures
    - **Repeat**: Up to max_iterations (default: 3)
 5. **Safety Net**: Auto-revert all changes if max iterations reached
 
-**Key Benefits**:
-- Faster feedback loop within Green phase
-- Autonomous recovery from initial implementation errors
-- Systematic debugging with Gemini's bug-fix template
-- Safe rollback prevents broken TDD state
+
 
 ## Configuration Options
 - **meta.max_iterations**: Number of fix attempts (default: 3 for TDD, 5 for test-gen)
-- **meta.use_codex**: Enable Codex automated fixes (default: false, manual)
+- **CLI tool usage**: Determined semantically from user's task description via `command` field in implementation_approach
 

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/task-generate.md

@@ -1,680 +0,0 @@
---- 
-name: task-generate
-description: Generate task JSON files and IMPL_PLAN.md from analysis results using action-planning-agent with artifact integration
-argument-hint: "--session WFS-session-id [--cli-execute]"
-examples:
-  - /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth --cli-execute
----
-
-# Task Generation Command
-
-## 1. Overview
-This command generates task JSON files and an `IMPL_PLAN.md` from brainstorming role analyses. It automatically detects and integrates all brainstorming artifacts (role-specific `analysis.md` files and `guidance-specification.md`), creating a structured and context-rich plan for implementation. The command supports two primary execution modes: a default agent-based mode for seamless context handling and a `--cli-execute` mode that leverages the Codex CLI for complex, autonomous development tasks. Its core function is to translate requirements and design specifications from role analyses into actionable, executable tasks, ensuring all necessary context, dependencies, and implementation steps are defined upfront.
-
-## 2. Execution Modes
-
-This command offers two distinct modes for task execution, providing flexibility for different implementation complexities.
-
-### Agent Mode (Default)
-In the default mode, each step in `implementation_approach` **omits the `command` field**. The agent interprets the step's `modification_points` and `logic_flow` to execute the task autonomously.
-- **Step Structure**: Contains `step`, `title`, `description`, `modification_points`, `logic_flow`, `depends_on`, and `output` fields
-- **Execution**: Agent reads these fields and performs the implementation autonomously
-- **Context Loading**: Agent loads context via `pre_analysis` steps
-- **Validation**: Agent validates against acceptance criteria in `context.acceptance`
-- **Benefit**: Direct agent execution with full context awareness, no external tool overhead
-- **Use Case**: Standard implementation tasks where agent capability is sufficient
-
-### CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`)
-When the `--cli-execute` flag is used, each step in `implementation_approach` **includes a `command` field** that specifies the exact execution command. This mode is designed for complex implementations requiring specialized CLI tools.
-- **Step Structure**: Includes all default fields PLUS a `command` field
-- **Execution**: The specified command executes the step directly (e.g., `bash(codex ...)`)
-- **Context Packages**: Each command receives context via the CONTEXT field in the prompt
-- **Multi-Step Support**: Complex tasks can have multiple sequential codex steps with `resume --last`
-- **Benefit**: Leverages specialized CLI tools (codex/gemini/qwen) for complex reasoning and autonomous execution
-- **Use Case**: Large-scale features, complex refactoring, or when user explicitly requests CLI tool usage
-
-## 3. Core Principles
-This command is built on a set of core principles to ensure efficient and reliable task generation.
-
-- **Role Analysis-Driven**: All generated tasks originate from role-specific `analysis.md` files (enhanced in synthesis phase), ensuring direct link between requirements/design and implementation
-- **Artifact-Aware**: Automatically detects and integrates all brainstorming outputs (role analyses, guidance-specification.md, enhancements) to enrich task context
-- **Context-Rich**: Embeds comprehensive context (requirements, focus paths, acceptance criteria, artifact references) directly into each task JSON
-- **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root (e.g., `./src/module`)
-- **Flow-Control Ready**: Pre-defines clear execution sequence (`pre_analysis`, `implementation_approach`) within each task
-- **Memory-First**: Prioritizes using documents already loaded in conversation memory to avoid redundant file operations
-- **Mode-Flexible**: Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution (with `--cli-execute` flag)
-- **Multi-Step Support**: Complex tasks can use multiple sequential steps in `implementation_approach` with codex resume mechanism
-- **Quantification-Enforced**: **NEW** - All requirements, acceptance criteria, and modification points MUST include explicit counts and enumerations to prevent ambiguity (e.g., "17 commands: [list]" not "implement commands")
-- **Responsibility**: Parses analysis, detects artifacts, generates enhanced task JSONs, creates `IMPL_PLAN.md` and `TODO_LIST.md`, updates session state
-
-## 3.5. Quantification Requirements (MANDATORY)
-
-**Purpose**: Eliminate ambiguity by enforcing explicit counts and enumerations in all task specifications.
-
-**Core Rules**:
-1. **Extract Counts from Analysis**: Search for HOW MANY items and list them explicitly
-2. **Enforce Explicit Lists**: Every deliverable uses format `{count} {type}: [{explicit_list}]`
-3. **Make Acceptance Measurable**: Include verification commands (e.g., `ls ... | wc -l = N`)
-4. **Quantify Modification Points**: Specify exact targets (files, functions with line numbers)
-5. **Avoid Vague Language**: Replace "complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize" with quantified statements
-
-**Standard Formats**:
-
-- **Requirements**: `"Implement N items: [item1, item2, ...]"` or `"Modify N files: [file1:func:lines, ...]"`
-- **Acceptance**: `"N items exist: verify by [command]"` or `"Coverage >= X%: verify by [test command]"`
-- **Modification Points**: `"Create N files: [list]"` or `"Modify N functions: [func() in file lines X-Y]"`
-
-**Validation Checklist**:
-- [ ] Every requirement contains explicit count or enumerated list
-- [ ] Every acceptance criterion is measurable with verification command
-- [ ] Every modification_point specifies exact targets (files/functions/lines)
-- [ ] No vague language ("complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize" without counts)
-- [ ] Each implementation step has its own acceptance criteria
-
-## 4. Execution Flow
-The command follows a streamlined, three-step process to convert analysis into executable tasks.
-
-### Step 1: Input & Discovery
-The process begins by gathering all necessary inputs. It follows a **Memory-First Rule**, skipping file reads if documents are already in the conversation memory.
-1.  **Session Validation**: Loads and validates the session from `.workflow/active/{session_id}/workflow-session.json`.
-2.  **Context Package Loading** (primary source): Reads `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/context-package.json` for smart context and artifact catalog.
-3.  **Brainstorm Artifacts Extraction**: Extracts role analysis paths from `context-package.json` → `brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[]` (supports `analysis*.md` automatically).
-4.  **Document Loading**: Reads role analyses, guidance specification, synthesis output, and conflict resolution (if exists) using paths from context package.
-
-### Step 2: Task Decomposition & Grouping
-Once all inputs are loaded, the command analyzes the tasks defined in the analysis results and groups them based on shared context.
-
-**Phase 2.1: Quantification Extraction (NEW - CRITICAL)**
-1. **Count Extraction**: Scan analysis documents for quantifiable information:
-   - Search for numbers + nouns (e.g., "5 files", "17 commands", "3 features")
-   - Identify enumerated lists (bullet points, numbered lists, comma-separated items)
-   - Extract explicit counts from tables, diagrams, or structured data
-   - Store extracted counts with their context (what is being counted)
-
-2. **List Enumeration**: Build explicit lists for each deliverable:
-   - If analysis says "implement session commands", enumerate ALL commands: [start, resume, list, complete, archive]
-   - If analysis mentions "create categories", list ALL categories: [literature, experiment, data-analysis, visualization, context]
-   - If analysis describes "modify functions", list ALL functions with line numbers
-   - Maintain full enumerations (no "..." unless list exceeds 20 items)
-
-3. **Verification Method Assignment**: For each deliverable, determine verification approach:
-   - File count: `ls {path}/*.{ext} | wc -l = {count}`
-   - Directory existence: `ls {parent}/ | grep -E '(name1|name2|...)' | wc -l = {count}`
-   - Test coverage: `pytest --cov={module} --cov-report=term | grep TOTAL | awk '{print $4}' >= {percentage}`
-   - Function existence: `grep -E '(func1|func2|...)' {file} | wc -l = {count}`
-
-4. **Ambiguity Detection**: Flag vague language for replacement:
-   - Detect words: "complete", "comprehensive", "reorganize", "refactor", "implement", "create" without counts
-   - Require quantification: "implement" → "implement {N} {items}: [{list}]"
-   - Reject unquantified deliverables
-
-**Phase 2.2: Task Definition & Grouping**
-1.  **Task Definition Parsing**: Extracts task definitions, requirements, and dependencies from quantified analysis
-2.  **Context Signature Analysis**: Computes a unique hash (`context_signature`) for each task based on its `focus_paths` and referenced `artifacts`
-3.  **Task Grouping**:
-    *   Tasks with the **same signature** are candidates for merging, as they operate on the same context
-    *   Tasks with **different signatures** and no dependencies are grouped for parallel execution
-    *   Tasks with `depends_on` relationships are marked for sequential execution
-4.  **Modification Target Determination**: Extracts specific code locations (`file:function:lines`) from the analysis to populate the `target_files` field
-
-### Step 3: Output Generation
-Finally, the command generates all the necessary output files.
-1.  **Task JSON Creation**: Creates individual `.task/IMPL-*.json` files, embedding all context, artifacts, and flow control steps. If `--cli-execute` is active, it generates the appropriate `codex exec` commands.
-2.  **IMPL_PLAN.md Generation**: Creates the main implementation plan document, summarizing the strategy, tasks, and dependencies.
-3.  **TODO_LIST.md Generation**: Creates a simple checklist for tracking task progress.
-4.  **Session State Update**: Updates `workflow-session.json` with the final task count and artifact inventory, marking the session as ready for execution.
-
-## 5. Task Decomposition Strategy
-The command employs a sophisticated strategy to group and decompose tasks, optimizing for context reuse and parallel execution.
-
-### Core Principles
-- **Primary Rule: Shared Context → Merge Tasks**: Tasks that operate on the same files, use the same artifacts, and share the same tech stack are merged. This avoids redundant context loading and recognizes inherent relationships between the tasks.
-- **Secondary Rule: Different Contexts + No Dependencies → Decompose for Parallel Execution**: Tasks that are fully independent (different files, different artifacts, no shared dependencies) are decomposed into separate parallel execution groups.
-
-### Context Analysis for Task Grouping
-The decision to merge or decompose is based on analyzing context indicators:
-
-1.  **Shared Context Indicators (→ Merge)**:
-    *   Identical `focus_paths` (working on the same modules/files).
-    *   Same tech stack and dependencies.
-    *   Identical `context.artifacts` references.
-    *   A sequential logic flow within the same feature.
-    *   Shared test fixtures or setup.
-
-2.  **Independent Context Indicators (→ Decompose)**:
-    *   Different `focus_paths` (separate modules).
-    *   Different tech stacks (e.g., frontend vs. backend).
-    *   Different `context.artifacts` (using different brainstorming outputs).
-    *   No shared dependencies.
-    *   Can be tested independently.
-
-**Decomposition is only performed when**:
-- Tasks have different contexts and no shared dependencies (enabling parallel execution).
-- A single task represents an excessive workload (e.g., >2500 lines of code or >6 files to modify).
-- A sequential dependency creates a necessary block (e.g., IMPL-1 must complete before IMPL-2 can start).
-
-### Context Signature Algorithm
-To automate grouping, a `context_signature` is computed for each task.
-
-```javascript
-// Compute context signature for task grouping
-function computeContextSignature(task) {
-  const focusPathsStr = task.context.focus_paths.sort().join('|');
-  const artifactsStr = task.context.artifacts.map(a => a.path).sort().join('|');
-  const techStack = task.context.shared_context?.tech_stack?.sort().join('|') || '';
-
-  return hash(`${focusPathsStr}:${artifactsStr}:${techStack}`);
-}
-```
-
-### Execution Group Assignment
-Tasks are assigned to execution groups based on their signatures and dependencies.
-
-```javascript
-// Group tasks by context signature
-function groupTasksByContext(tasks) {
-  const groups = {};
-
-  tasks.forEach(task => {
-    const signature = computeContextSignature(task);
-    if (!groups[signature]) {
-      groups[signature] = [];
-    }
-    groups[signature].push(task);
-  });
-
-  return groups;
-}
-
-// Assign execution groups for parallel tasks
-function assignExecutionGroups(tasks) {
-  const contextGroups = groupTasksByContext(tasks);
-
-  Object.entries(contextGroups).forEach(([signature, groupTasks]) => {
-    if (groupTasks.length === 1) {
-      const task = groupTasks[0];
-      // Single task with unique context
-      if (!task.context.depends_on || task.context.depends_on.length === 0) {
-        task.meta.execution_group = `parallel-${signature.slice(0, 8)}`;
-      } else {
-        task.meta.execution_group = null; // Sequential task
-      }
-    } else {
-      // Multiple tasks with same context → Should be merged
-      console.warn(`Tasks ${groupTasks.map(t => t.id).join(', ')} share context and should be merged`);
-      // Merge tasks into single task
-      return mergeTasks(groupTasks);
-    }
-  });
-}
-```
-**Task Limits**:
-- **Maximum 10 tasks** (hard limit).
-- **Hierarchy**: Flat (≤5 tasks) or two-level (6-10 tasks). If >10, the scope should be re-evaluated.
-- **Parallel Groups**: Tasks with the same `execution_group` ID are independent and can run concurrently.
-
-## 6. Generated Outputs
-The command produces three key documents and a directory of task files.
-
-### 6.1. Task JSON Schema (`.task/IMPL-*.json`)
-Each task JSON embeds all necessary context, artifacts, and execution steps using this schema:
-
-**Top-Level Fields**:
-- `id`: Task identifier (format: `IMPL-N` or `IMPL-N.M` for subtasks)
-- `title`: Descriptive task name
-- `status`: Task state (`pending|active|completed|blocked|container`)
-- `context_package_path`: Path to context package (`.workflow/active/WFS-[session]/.process/context-package.json`)
-- `meta`: Task metadata
-- `context`: Task-specific context and requirements
-- `flow_control`: Execution steps and workflow
-
-**Meta Object**:
-- `type`: Task category (`feature|bugfix|refactor|test-gen|test-fix|docs`)
-- `agent`: Assigned agent (`@code-developer|@test-fix-agent|@universal-executor`)
-- `execution_group`: Parallelization group ID or null
-- `context_signature`: Hash for context-based grouping
-
-**Context Object**:
-- `requirements`: Quantified implementation requirements (with counts and explicit lists)
-- `focus_paths`: Target directories/files (absolute or relative paths)
-- `acceptance`: Measurable acceptance criteria (with verification commands)
-- `parent`: Parent task ID for subtasks
-- `depends_on`: Prerequisite task IDs
-- `inherited`: Shared patterns and dependencies from parent
-- `shared_context`: Tech stack and conventions
-- `artifacts`: Referenced brainstorm artifacts with paths, priority, and usage
-
-**Flow Control Object**:
-- `pre_analysis`: Context loading and preparation steps
-  - `load_context_package`: Load smart context and artifact catalog
-  - `load_role_analysis_artifacts`: Load role analyses dynamically from context package
-  - `load_planning_context`: Load finalized decisions with resolved conflicts
-  - `codebase_exploration`: Discover existing patterns
-  - `analyze_task_patterns`: Identify modification targets
-- `implementation_approach`: Execution steps
-  - **Agent Mode**: Steps contain `modification_points` and `logic_flow` (agent executes autonomously)
-  - **CLI Mode**: Steps include `command` field with CLI tool invocation
-- `target_files`: Specific files/functions/lines to modify
-
-**Key Characteristics**:
-- **Quantification**: All requirements/acceptance use explicit counts and enumerations
-- **Mode Flexibility**: Supports both agent execution (default) and CLI tool execution (`--cli-execute`)
-- **Context Intelligence**: References context-package.json for smart context and artifact paths
-- **Artifact Integration**: Dynamically loads role analyses and brainstorm artifacts
-
-**Example Task JSON**:
-```json
-{
-  "id": "IMPL-1",
-  "title": "Implement feature X with Y components",
-  "status": "pending",
-  "context_package_path": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/.process/context-package.json",
-  "meta": {
-    "type": "feature",
-    "agent": "@code-developer",
-    "execution_group": "parallel-abc123",
-    "context_signature": "hash-value"
-  },
-  "context": {
-    "requirements": [
-      "Implement 5 commands: [cmd1, cmd2, cmd3, cmd4, cmd5]",
-      "Create 3 directories: [dir1/, dir2/, dir3/]",
-      "Modify 2 functions: [funcA() in file1.ts lines 10-25, funcB() in file2.ts lines 40-60]"
-    ],
-    "focus_paths": ["D:\\project\\src\\module", "./tests/module"],
-    "acceptance": [
-      "5 command files created: verify by ls .claude/commands/*/*.md | wc -l = 5",
-      "3 directories exist: verify by ls -d dir*/ | wc -l = 3",
-      "All tests pass: pytest tests/ --cov=src/module (>=80% coverage)"
-    ],
-    "depends_on": [],
-    "artifacts": [
-      {
-        "path": ".workflow/active/WFS-session/.brainstorming/system-architect/analysis.md",
-        "priority": "highest",
-        "usage": "Architecture decisions and API specifications"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-  "flow_control": {
-    "pre_analysis": [
-      {
-        "step": "load_context_package",
-        "action": "Load context package for artifact paths and smart context",
-        "commands": ["Read({{context_package_path}})"],
-        "output_to": "context_package",
-        "on_error": "fail"
-      },
-      {
-        "step": "load_role_analysis_artifacts",
-        "action": "Load role analyses from context-package.json",
-        "commands": [
-          "Read({{context_package_path}})",
-          "Extract(brainstorm_artifacts.role_analyses[].files[].path)",
-          "Read(each extracted path)"
-        ],
-        "output_to": "role_analysis_artifacts",
-        "on_error": "skip_optional"
-      }
-    ],
-    "implementation_approach": [
-      {
-        "step": 1,
-        "title": "Implement feature following role analyses",
-        "description": "Implement feature X using requirements from role analyses and context package",
-        "modification_points": [
-          "Create 5 command files: [cmd1.md, cmd2.md, cmd3.md, cmd4.md, cmd5.md]",
-          "Modify funcA() in file1.ts lines 10-25: add validation logic",
-          "Modify funcB() in file2.ts lines 40-60: integrate with new API"
-        ],
-        "logic_flow": [
-          "Load role analyses and context package",
-          "Extract requirements and design decisions",
-          "Implement commands following existing patterns",
-          "Update functions with new logic",
-          "Validate against acceptance criteria"
-        ],
-        "depends_on": [],
-        "output": "implementation"
-      }
-    ],
-    "target_files": ["file1.ts:funcA:10-25", "file2.ts:funcB:40-60"]
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Note**: In CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`), `implementation_approach` steps include a `command` field with the CLI tool invocation (e.g., `bash(codex ...)`).
-
-### 6.2. IMPL_PLAN.md Structure
-This document provides a high-level overview of the entire implementation plan.
-
-```markdown
----
-identifier: WFS-{session-id}
-source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
-role_analyses: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.brainstorming/[role]/analysis*.md
-artifacts: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.brainstorming/
-context_package: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
-guidance_specification: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.brainstorming/guidance-specification.md  # Finalized decisions with resolved conflicts
-workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design"  # Indicates execution model
-verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
-  synthesis_clarify: "passed | skipped | pending"  # Brainstorm phase clarification
-  action_plan_verify: "pending"
-  conflict_resolution: "resolved | none | low"  # Status from context-package.json
-phase_progression: "brainstorm → synthesis → context → conflict_resolution (if needed) → planning"  # CCW workflow phases
----
-
-# Implementation Plan: {Project Title}
-
-## 1. Summary
-Core requirements, objectives, technical approach summary (2-3 paragraphs max).
-
-**Core Objectives**:
-- [Key objective 1]
-- [Key objective 2]
-
-**Technical Approach**:
-- [High-level approach]
-
-## 2. Context Analysis
-
-### CCW Workflow Context
-**Phase Progression**:
-- ✅ Phase 1: Brainstorming (role analyses generated by participating roles)
-- ✅ Phase 2: Synthesis (concept enhancement + clarification, {N} questions answered, role analyses refined)
-- ✅ Phase 3: Context Gathering (context-package.json: {N} files, {M} modules analyzed, conflict_risk: {level})
-- ✅ Phase 4: Conflict Resolution ({status}: {conflict_count} conflicts detected and resolved | skipped if no conflicts)
-- ⏳ Phase 5: Task Generation (current phase - generating IMPL_PLAN.md and task JSONs)
-
-**Quality Gates**:
-- synthesis-clarify: ✅ Passed ({N} ambiguities resolved, {M} enhancements applied)
-- action-plan-verify: ⏳ Pending (recommended before /workflow:execute)
-
-**Context Package Summary**:
-- **Focus Paths**: {list key directories from context-package.json}
-- **Key Files**: {list primary files for modification}
-- **Module Depth Analysis**: {from get_modules_by_depth.sh output}
-- **Smart Context**: {total file count} files, {module count} modules, {dependency count} dependencies identified
-
-### Project Profile
-- **Type**: Greenfield/Enhancement/Refactor
-- **Scale**: User count, data volume, complexity
-- **Tech Stack**: Primary technologies
-- **Timeline**: Duration and milestones
-
-### Module Structure
-'''
-[Directory tree showing key modules]
-'''
-
-### Dependencies
-**Primary**: [Core libraries and frameworks]
-**APIs**: [External services]
-**Development**: [Testing, linting, CI/CD tools]
-
-### Patterns & Conventions
-- **Architecture**: [Key patterns like DI, Event-Driven]
-- **Component Design**: [Design patterns]
-- **State Management**: [State strategy]
-- **Code Style**: [Naming, TypeScript coverage]
-
-## 3. Brainstorming Artifacts Reference
-
-### Artifact Usage Strategy
-**Primary Reference (Role Analyses)**:
-- **What**: Role-specific analyses from brainstorming phase providing multi-perspective insights
-- **When**: Every task references relevant role analyses for requirements and design decisions
-- **How**: Extract requirements, architecture decisions, UI/UX patterns from applicable role documents
-- **Priority**: Collective authoritative source - multiple role perspectives provide comprehensive coverage
-- **CCW Value**: Maintains role-specific expertise while enabling cross-role integration during planning
-
-**Context Intelligence (context-package.json)**:
-- **What**: Smart context gathered by CCW's context-gather phase
-- **Content**: Focus paths, dependency graph, existing patterns, module structure, tech stack, conflict_risk status
-- **Usage**: Tasks load this via `flow_control.preparatory_steps` for environment setup and conflict awareness
-- **CCW Value**: Automated intelligent context discovery replacing manual file exploration
-
-**Conflict Resolution Status**:
-- **What**: Conflict resolution applied in-place to brainstorm artifacts (if conflict_risk was >= medium)
-- **Location**: guidance-specification.md and role analyses (*.md) contain resolved conflicts
-- **Status**: Check context-package.json → conflict_detection.conflict_risk ("resolved" | "none" | "low")
-- **Usage**: Read finalized decisions from guidance-specification.md (includes applied resolutions)
-- **CCW Value**: Interactive conflict resolution with user confirmation, modifications applied automatically
-
-### Role Analysis Documents (Highest Priority)
-Role analyses provide specialized perspectives on the implementation:
-- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Architecture design, ADRs, API specifications, caching strategies
-- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Design tokens, layout specifications, component patterns
-- **ux-expert/analysis.md**: User journeys, interaction flows, accessibility requirements
-- **guidance-specification/analysis.md**: Product vision, user stories, business requirements, success metrics
-- **data-architect/analysis.md**: Data models, schemas, database design, migration strategies
-- **api-designer/analysis.md**: API contracts, endpoint specifications, integration patterns
-
-### Supporting Artifacts (Reference)
-- **topic-framework.md**: Role-specific discussion points and analysis framework
-
-**Artifact Priority in Development**:
-1. {context_package_path} (primary source: smart context AND brainstorm artifact catalog in `brainstorm_artifacts` + conflict_risk status)
-2. role/analysis*.md (paths from context-package.json: requirements, design specs, enhanced by synthesis, with resolved conflicts if any)
-3. guidance-specification.md (path from context-package.json: finalized decisions with resolved conflicts if any)
-
-## 4. Implementation Strategy
-
-### Execution Strategy
-**Execution Model**: [Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles]
-
-**Rationale**: [Why this execution model fits the project]
-
-**Parallelization Opportunities**:
-- [List independent workstreams]
-
-**Serialization Requirements**:
-- [List critical dependencies]
-
-### Architectural Approach
-**Key Architecture Decisions**:
-- [ADR references from role analyses]
-- [Justification for architecture patterns]
-
-**Integration Strategy**:
-- [How modules communicate]
-- [State management approach]
-
-### Key Dependencies
-**Task Dependency Graph**:
-'''
-[High-level dependency visualization]
-'''
-
-**Critical Path**: [Identify bottleneck tasks]
-
-### Testing Strategy
-**Testing Approach**:
-- Unit testing: [Tools, scope]
-- Integration testing: [Key integration points]
-- E2E testing: [Critical user flows]
-
-**Coverage Targets**:
-- Lines: ≥70%
-- Functions: ≥70%
-- Branches: ≥65%
-
-**Quality Gates**:
-- [CI/CD gates]
-- [Performance budgets]
-
-## 5. Task Breakdown Summary
-
-### Task Count
-**{N} tasks** (flat hierarchy | two-level hierarchy, sequential | parallel execution)
-
-### Task Structure
-- **IMPL-1**: [Main task title]
-- **IMPL-2**: [Main task title]
-...
-
-### Complexity Assessment
-- **High**: [List with rationale]
-- **Medium**: [List]
-- **Low**: [List]
-
-### Dependencies
-[Reference Section 4.3 for dependency graph]
-
-**Parallelization Opportunities**:
-- [Specific task groups that can run in parallel]
-
-## 6. Implementation Plan (Detailed Phased Breakdown)
-
-### Execution Strategy
-
-**Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): [Phase Name]**
-- **Tasks**: IMPL-1, IMPL-2
-- **Deliverables**:
-  - [Specific deliverable 1]
-  - [Specific deliverable 2]
-- **Success Criteria**:
-  - [Measurable criterion]
-
-**Phase 2 (Weeks 3-N): [Phase Name]**
-...
-
-### Resource Requirements
-
-**Development Team**:
-- [Team composition and skills]
-
-**External Dependencies**:
-- [Third-party services, APIs]
-
-**Infrastructure**:
-- [Development, staging, production environments]
-
-## 7. Risk Assessment & Mitigation
-
-| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
-|------|--------|-------------|---------------------|-------|
-| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Strategy] | [Role] |
-
-**Critical Risks** (High impact + High probability):
-- [Risk 1]: [Detailed mitigation plan]
-
-**Monitoring Strategy**:
-- [How risks will be monitored]
-
-## 8. Success Criteria
-
-**Functional Completeness**:
-- [ ] All requirements from role analysis documents implemented
-- [ ] All acceptance criteria from task.json files met
-
-**Technical Quality**:
-- [ ] Test coverage ≥70%
-- [ ] Bundle size within budget
-- [ ] Performance targets met
-
-**Operational Readiness**:
-- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational
-- [ ] Monitoring and logging configured
-- [ ] Documentation complete
-
-**Business Metrics**:
-- [ ] [Key business metrics from role analyses]
-```
-
-### 6.3. TODO_LIST.md Structure
-A simple Markdown file for tracking the status of each task.
-
-```markdown
-# Tasks: [Session Topic]
-
-## Task Progress
-▸ **IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
-  - [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
-  - [x] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-001.2-summary.md)
-
-- [x] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json) | [✅](./.summaries/IMPL-002-summary.md)
-
-## Status Legend
-- `▸` = Container task (has subtasks)
-- `- [ ]` = Pending leaf task
-- `- [x]` = Completed leaf task
-- Maximum 2 levels: Main tasks and subtasks only
-```
-
-### 6.4. Output Files Diagram
-The command organizes outputs into a standard directory structure.
-```
-.workflow/active//{session-id}/
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md                     # Implementation plan
-├── TODO_LIST.md                     # Progress tracking
-├── .task/
-│   ├── IMPL-1.json                  # Container task
-│   ├── IMPL-1.1.json                # Leaf task with flow_control
-│   └── IMPL-1.2.json                # Leaf task with flow_control
-├── .brainstorming              # Input artifacts from brainstorm + synthesis
-│   ├── guidance-specification.md    # Finalized decisions (with resolved conflicts if any)
-│   └── {role}/analysis*.md          # Role analyses (enhanced by synthesis, with resolved conflicts if any)
-└── .process/
-    └── context-package.json         # Input from context-gather (smart context + conflict_risk status)
-```
-
-## 7. Artifact Integration
-The command intelligently detects and integrates artifacts from the `.brainstorming/` directory.
-
-#### Artifact Priority
-1.  **context-package.json** (critical): Primary source - smart context AND all brainstorm artifact paths in `brainstorm_artifacts` section + conflict_risk status
-2.  **role/analysis*.md** (highest): Paths from context-package.json → role-specific requirements, design specs, enhanced by synthesis, with resolved conflicts applied in-place
-3.  **guidance-specification.md** (high): Path from context-package.json → finalized decisions with resolved conflicts (if conflict_risk was >= medium)
-
-#### Artifact-Task Mapping
-Artifacts are mapped to tasks based on their relevance to the task's domain.
-- **Role analysis.md files**: Primary requirements source - all relevant role analyses included based on task type
-- **ui-designer/analysis.md**: Mapped to UI/Frontend tasks for design tokens, layouts, components
-- **system-architect/analysis.md**: Mapped to Architecture/Backend tasks for ADRs, APIs, patterns
-- **subject-matter-expert/analysis.md**: Mapped to tasks related to domain logic or standards
-- **data-architect/analysis.md**: Mapped to tasks involving data models, schemas, or APIs
-- **product-manager/analysis.md**: Mapped to all tasks for business requirements and user stories
-
-This ensures that each task has access to the most relevant and detailed specifications from role-specific analyses.
-
-## 8. Error Handling
-
-### Input Validation Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| Session not found | Invalid session ID | Verify session exists |
-| Context missing | Incomplete planning | Run context-gather first |
-| Invalid format | Corrupted results | Regenerate analysis |
-
-### Task Generation Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| Count exceeds limit | >10 tasks | Re-scope requirements |
-| Invalid structure | Missing fields | Fix analysis results |
-| Dependency cycle | Circular refs | Adjust dependencies |
-
-### Artifact Integration Errors
-| Error | Cause | Recovery |
-|-------|-------|----------|
-| Artifact not found | Missing output | Continue without artifacts |
-| Invalid format | Corrupted file | Skip artifact loading |
-| Path invalid | Moved/deleted | Update references |
-
-## 10. Usage & Related Commands
-
-**Basic Usage**:
-```bash
-/workflow:tools:task-generate --session WFS-auth [--cli-execute]
-```
-
-**Workflow Integration**:
-- Called by: `/workflow:plan` (task generation phase)
-- Followed by: `/workflow:execute`, `/workflow:status`
-
-**Related Commands**:
-- `/workflow:plan` - Orchestrates entire planning workflow
-- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Provides context package input
-- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Provides conflict resolution (if needed)
-- `/workflow:execute` - Executes generated tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/tdd-coverage-analysis.md

@@ -17,6 +17,38 @@ Analyze test coverage and verify Red-Green-Refactor cycle execution for TDD work
 - Verify TDD cycle execution (Red -> Green -> Refactor)
 - Generate coverage and cycle reports
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session
+   └─ Validation: session_id REQUIRED
+
+Phase 1: Extract Test Tasks
+   └─ Find TEST-*.json files and extract focus_paths
+
+Phase 2: Run Test Suite
+   └─ Decision (test framework):
+      ├─ Node.js → npm test --coverage --json
+      ├─ Python → pytest --cov --json-report
+      └─ Other → [test_command] --coverage --json
+
+Phase 3: Parse Coverage Data
+   ├─ Extract line coverage percentage
+   ├─ Extract branch coverage percentage
+   ├─ Extract function coverage percentage
+   └─ Identify uncovered lines/branches
+
+Phase 4: Verify TDD Cycle
+   └─ FOR each TDD chain (TEST-N.M → IMPL-N.M → REFACTOR-N.M):
+      ├─ Red Phase: Verify tests created and failed initially
+      ├─ Green Phase: Verify tests now pass
+      └─ Refactor Phase: Verify code quality improved
+
+Phase 5: Generate Analysis Report
+   └─ Create tdd-cycle-report.md with coverage metrics and cycle verification
+```
+
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
 ### Phase 1: Extract Test Tasks

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-concept-enhanced.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: test-concept-enhanced
-description: Analyze test requirements and generate test generation strategy using Gemini with test-context package
+description: Coordinate test analysis workflow using cli-execution-agent to generate test strategy via Gemini
 argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id --context path/to/test-context-package.json"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-concept-enhanced --session WFS-test-auth --context .workflow/active/WFS-test-auth/.process/test-context-package.json
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ examples:
 # Test Concept Enhanced Command
 
 ## Overview
-Specialized analysis tool for test generation workflows that uses Gemini to analyze test coverage gaps, implementation context, and generate comprehensive test generation strategies.
+Workflow coordinator that delegates test analysis to cli-execution-agent. Agent executes Gemini to analyze test coverage gaps, implementation context, and generate comprehensive test generation strategies.
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 - **Coverage-Driven**: Focus on identified test gaps from context analysis
@@ -19,15 +19,39 @@ Specialized analysis tool for test generation workflows that uses Gemini to anal
 - **No Code Generation**: Strategy and planning only, actual test generation happens in task execution
 
 ## Core Responsibilities
-- Parse test-context-package.json from test-context-gather
-- Analyze implementation summaries and coverage gaps
-- Study existing test patterns and conventions
-- Generate test generation strategy using Gemini
-- Produce TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md for task generation
+- Coordinate test analysis workflow using cli-execution-agent
+- Validate test-context-package.json prerequisites
+- Execute Gemini analysis via agent for test strategy generation
+- Validate agent outputs (gemini-test-analysis.md, TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session, --context
+   └─ Validation: Both REQUIRED
+
+Phase 1: Context Preparation (Command)
+   ├─ Load workflow-session.json
+   ├─ Verify test session type is "test-gen"
+   ├─ Validate test-context-package.json
+   └─ Determine strategy (Simple: 1-3 files | Medium: 4-6 | Complex: >6)
+
+Phase 2: Test Analysis Execution (Agent)
+   ├─ Execute Gemini analysis via cli-execution-agent
+   └─ Generate TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+
+Phase 3: Output Validation (Command)
+   ├─ Verify gemini-test-analysis.md exists
+   ├─ Validate TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+   └─ Confirm test requirements are actionable
+```
 
 ## Execution Lifecycle
 
-### Phase 1: Validation & Preparation
+### Phase 1: Context Preparation (Command Responsibility)
+
+**Command prepares session context and validates prerequisites.**
 
 1. **Session Validation**
    - Load `.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/workflow-session.json`
@@ -40,423 +64,101 @@ Specialized analysis tool for test generation workflows that uses Gemini to anal
    - Extract coverage gaps and framework details
 
 3. **Strategy Determination**
-   - **Simple Test Generation** (1-3 files): Single Gemini analysis
-   - **Medium Test Generation** (4-6 files): Gemini comprehensive analysis
-   - **Complex Test Generation** (>6 files): Gemini analysis with modular approach
+   - **Simple** (1-3 files): Single Gemini analysis
+   - **Medium** (4-6 files): Comprehensive analysis
+   - **Complex** (>6 files): Modular analysis approach
 
-### Phase 2: Gemini Test Analysis
+### Phase 2: Test Analysis Execution (Agent Responsibility)
 
-**Tool Configuration**:
-```bash
-cd .workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process && gemini -p "
-PURPOSE: Analyze test coverage gaps and design comprehensive test generation strategy
-TASK: Study implementation context, existing tests, and generate test requirements for missing coverage
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @{.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json}
+**Purpose**: Analyze test coverage gaps and generate comprehensive test strategy.
 
-**MANDATORY FIRST STEP**: Read and analyze test-context-package.json to understand:
-- Test coverage gaps from test_coverage.missing_tests[]
-- Implementation context from source_context.implementation_summaries[]
-- Existing test patterns from test_framework.conventions
-- Changed files requiring tests from source_context.implementation_summaries[].changed_files
+**Agent Invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-execution-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Analyze test coverage gaps and generate test strategy",
+  prompt=`
+## TASK OBJECTIVE
+Analyze test requirements and generate comprehensive test generation strategy using Gemini CLI
 
-**ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS**:
+## EXECUTION CONTEXT
+Session: {test_session_id}
+Source Session: {source_session_id}
+Working Dir: .workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process
+Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-concept-analysis.txt
 
-1. **Implementation Understanding**
-   - Load all implementation summaries from source session
-   - Understand implemented features, APIs, and business logic
-   - Extract key functions, classes, and modules
-   - Identify integration points and dependencies
+## EXECUTION STEPS
+1. Execute Gemini analysis:
+   ccw cli -p "$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-concept-analysis.txt)" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process
 
-2. **Existing Test Pattern Analysis**
-   - Study existing test files for patterns and conventions
-   - Identify test structure (describe/it, test suites, fixtures)
-   - Analyze assertion patterns and mocking strategies
-   - Extract test setup/teardown patterns
+2. Generate TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md:
+   Synthesize gemini-test-analysis.md into standardized format for task generation
+   Include: coverage assessment, test framework, test requirements, generation strategy, implementation targets
 
-3. **Coverage Gap Assessment**
-   - For each file in missing_tests[], analyze:
-     - File purpose and functionality
-     - Public APIs requiring test coverage
-     - Critical paths and edge cases
-     - Integration points requiring tests
-   - Prioritize tests: high (core logic), medium (utilities), low (helpers)
+## EXPECTED OUTPUTS
+1. gemini-test-analysis.md - Raw Gemini analysis
+2. TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md - Standardized test requirements document
 
-4. **Test Requirements Specification**
-   - For each missing test file, specify:
-     - **Test scope**: What needs to be tested
-     - **Test scenarios**: Happy path, error cases, edge cases, integration
-     - **Test data**: Required fixtures, mocks, test data
-     - **Dependencies**: External services, databases, APIs to mock
-     - **Coverage targets**: Functions/methods requiring tests
-
-5. **Test Generation Strategy**
-   - Determine test generation approach for each file
-   - Identify reusable test patterns from existing tests
-   - Plan test data and fixture requirements
-   - Define mocking strategy for dependencies
-   - Specify expected test file structure
-
-EXPECTED OUTPUT - Write to gemini-test-analysis.md:
-
-# Test Generation Analysis
-
-## 1. Implementation Context Summary
-- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
-- **Implemented Features**: {feature_summary}
-- **Changed Files**: {list_of_implementation_files}
-- **Tech Stack**: {technologies_used}
-
-## 2. Test Coverage Assessment
-- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
-- **Missing Tests**: {count} files
-- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
-- **Priority Breakdown**:
-  - High Priority: {count} files (core business logic)
-  - Medium Priority: {count} files (utilities, helpers)
-  - Low Priority: {count} files (configuration, constants)
-
-## 3. Existing Test Pattern Analysis
-- **Test Framework**: {framework_name_and_version}
-- **File Naming Convention**: {pattern}
-- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_or_other}
-- **Assertion Style**: {expect_assert_should}
-- **Mocking Strategy**: {mocking_framework_and_patterns}
-- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach_patterns}
-- **Test Data**: {fixtures_factories_builders}
-
-## 4. Test Requirements by File
-
-### File: {implementation_file_path}
-**Test File**: {suggested_test_file_path}
-**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
-
-#### Scope
-- {description_of_what_needs_testing}
-
-#### Test Scenarios
-1. **Happy Path Tests**
-   - {scenario_1}
-   - {scenario_2}
-
-2. **Error Handling Tests**
-   - {error_scenario_1}
-   - {error_scenario_2}
-
-3. **Edge Case Tests**
-   - {edge_case_1}
-   - {edge_case_2}
-
-4. **Integration Tests** (if applicable)
-   - {integration_scenario_1}
-   - {integration_scenario_2}
-
-#### Test Data & Fixtures
-- {required_test_data}
-- {required_mocks}
-- {required_fixtures}
-
-#### Dependencies to Mock
-- {external_service_1}
-- {external_service_2}
-
-#### Coverage Targets
-- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
-- Function: {function_name} - {test_requirements}
-
----
-[Repeat for each missing test file]
----
-
-## 5. Test Generation Strategy
-
-### Overall Approach
-- {strategy_description}
-
-### Test Generation Order
-1. {file_1} - {rationale}
-2. {file_2} - {rationale}
-3. {file_3} - {rationale}
-
-### Reusable Patterns
-- {pattern_1_from_existing_tests}
-- {pattern_2_from_existing_tests}
-
-### Test Data Strategy
-- {approach_to_test_data_and_fixtures}
-
-### Mocking Strategy
-- {approach_to_mocking_dependencies}
-
-### Quality Criteria
-- Code coverage target: {percentage}%
-- Test scenarios per function: {count}
-- Integration test coverage: {approach}
-
-## 6. Implementation Targets
-
-**Purpose**: Identify new test files to create
-
-**Format**: New test files only (no existing files to modify)
-
-**Test Files to Create**:
-1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
-   - **Type**: Create new test file
-   - **Purpose**: Test TokenValidator class
-   - **Scenarios**: 15 test cases covering validation logic, error handling, edge cases
-   - **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, test fixtures for tokens
-
-2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
-   - **Type**: Create new test file
-   - **Purpose**: Test error handling middleware
-   - **Scenarios**: 8 test cases for different error types and response formats
-   - **Dependencies**: Mock Express req/res/next, error fixtures
-
-[List all test files to create]
-
-## 7. Success Metrics
-- **Test Coverage Goal**: {target_percentage}%
-- **Test Quality**: All scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
-- **Convention Compliance**: Follow existing test patterns
-- **Maintainability**: Clear test descriptions, reusable fixtures
-
-RULES:
-- Focus on TEST REQUIREMENTS and GENERATION STRATEGY, NOT code generation
-- Study existing test patterns thoroughly for consistency
-- Prioritize critical business logic tests
-- Specify clear test scenarios and coverage targets
-- Identify all dependencies requiring mocks
-- **MUST write output to .workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md**
-- Do NOT generate actual test code or implementation
-- Output ONLY test analysis and generation strategy
-" --approval-mode yolo
+## QUALITY VALIDATION
+- Both output files exist and are complete
+- All required sections present in TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+- Test requirements are actionable and quantified
+- Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
+- Dependencies and mocks clearly identified
+`
+)
 ```
 
-**Output Location**: `.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md`
+**Output Files**:
+- `.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/gemini-test-analysis.md`
+- `.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
 
-### Phase 3: Results Synthesis
+### Phase 3: Output Validation (Command Responsibility)
 
-1. **Output Validation**
-   - Verify `gemini-test-analysis.md` exists and is complete
-   - Validate all required sections present
-   - Check test requirements are actionable
+**Command validates agent outputs.**
 
-2. **Quality Assessment**
-   - Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
-   - Dependencies and mocks clearly identified
-   - Test generation strategy is practical
-   - Coverage targets are reasonable
-
-### Phase 4: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Generation
-
-Synthesize Gemini analysis into standardized format:
-
-```markdown
-# Test Generation Analysis Results
-
-## Executive Summary
-- **Test Session**: {test_session_id}
-- **Source Session**: {source_session_id}
-- **Analysis Timestamp**: {timestamp}
-- **Coverage Gap**: {missing_test_count} files require tests
-- **Test Framework**: {framework}
-- **Overall Strategy**: {high_level_approach}
-
----
-
-## 1. Coverage Assessment
-
-### Current Coverage
-- **Existing Tests**: {count} files
-- **Implementation Files**: {count} files
-- **Coverage Percentage**: {percentage}%
-
-### Missing Tests (Priority Order)
-1. **High Priority** ({count} files)
-   - {file_1} - {reason}
-   - {file_2} - {reason}
-
-2. **Medium Priority** ({count} files)
-   - {file_1} - {reason}
-
-3. **Low Priority** ({count} files)
-   - {file_1} - {reason}
-
----
-
-## 2. Test Framework & Conventions
-
-### Framework Configuration
-- **Framework**: {framework_name}
-- **Version**: {version}
-- **Test Pattern**: {file_pattern}
-- **Test Directory**: {directory_structure}
-
-### Conventions
-- **File Naming**: {convention}
-- **Test Structure**: {describe_it_blocks}
-- **Assertions**: {assertion_library}
-- **Mocking**: {mocking_framework}
-- **Setup/Teardown**: {beforeEach_afterEach}
-
-### Example Pattern (from existing tests)
-```
-{example_test_structure_from_analysis}
-```
-
----
-
-## 3. Test Requirements by File
-
-[For each missing test, include:]
-
-### Test File: {test_file_path}
-**Implementation**: {implementation_file}
-**Priority**: {high|medium|low}
-**Estimated Test Count**: {count}
-
-#### Test Scenarios
-1. **Happy Path**: {scenarios}
-2. **Error Handling**: {scenarios}
-3. **Edge Cases**: {scenarios}
-4. **Integration**: {scenarios}
-
-#### Dependencies & Mocks
-- {dependency_1_to_mock}
-- {dependency_2_to_mock}
-
-#### Test Data Requirements
-- {fixture_1}
-- {fixture_2}
-
----
-
-## 4. Test Generation Strategy
-
-### Generation Approach
-{overall_strategy_description}
-
-### Generation Order
-1. {test_file_1} - {rationale}
-2. {test_file_2} - {rationale}
-3. {test_file_3} - {rationale}
-
-### Reusable Components
-- **Test Fixtures**: {common_fixtures}
-- **Mock Patterns**: {common_mocks}
-- **Helper Functions**: {test_helpers}
-
-### Quality Targets
-- **Coverage Goal**: {percentage}%
-- **Scenarios per Function**: {min_count}
-- **Integration Coverage**: {approach}
-
----
-
-## 5. Implementation Targets
-
-**Purpose**: New test files to create (code-developer will generate these)
-
-**Test Files to Create**:
-
-1. **Target**: `tests/auth/TokenValidator.test.ts`
-   - **Implementation Source**: `src/auth/TokenValidator.ts`
-   - **Test Scenarios**: 15 (validation, error handling, edge cases)
-   - **Dependencies**: Mock JWT library, token fixtures
-   - **Priority**: High
-
-2. **Target**: `tests/middleware/errorHandler.test.ts`
-   - **Implementation Source**: `src/middleware/errorHandler.ts`
-   - **Test Scenarios**: 8 (error types, response formats)
-   - **Dependencies**: Mock Express, error fixtures
-   - **Priority**: High
-
-[List all test files with full specifications]
-
----
-
-## 6. Success Criteria
-
-### Coverage Metrics
-- Achieve {target_percentage}% code coverage
-- All public APIs have tests
-- Critical paths fully covered
-
-### Quality Standards
-- All test scenarios covered (happy, error, edge, integration)
-- Follow existing test conventions
-- Clear test descriptions and assertions
-- Maintainable test structure
-
-### Validation Approach
-- Run full test suite after generation
-- Verify coverage with coverage tool
-- Manual review of test quality
-- Integration test validation
-
----
-
-## 7. Reference Information
-
-### Source Context
-- **Implementation Summaries**: {paths}
-- **Existing Tests**: {example_tests}
-- **Documentation**: {relevant_docs}
-
-### Analysis Tools
-- **Gemini Analysis**: gemini-test-analysis.md
-- **Coverage Tools**: {coverage_tool_if_detected}
-```
-
-**Output Location**: `.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md`
+- Verify `gemini-test-analysis.md` exists and is complete
+- Validate `TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md` generated by agent
+- Check required sections present
+- Confirm test requirements are actionable
 
 ## Error Handling
 
 ### Validation Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| Missing context package | test-context-gather not run | Run test-context-gather first |
-| No coverage gaps | All files have tests | Skip test generation, proceed to test execution |
-| No test framework detected | Missing test dependencies | Request user to configure test framework |
-| Invalid source session | Source session incomplete | Complete implementation first |
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Missing context package | Run test-context-gather first |
+| No coverage gaps | Skip test generation, proceed to execution |
+| No test framework detected | Configure test framework |
+| Invalid source session | Complete implementation first |
 
-### Gemini Execution Errors
-| Error | Cause | Recovery |
-|-------|-------|----------|
-| Timeout | Large project analysis | Reduce scope, analyze by module |
-| Output incomplete | Token limit exceeded | Retry with focused analysis |
-| No output file | Write permission error | Check directory permissions |
+### Execution Errors
+| Error | Recovery |
+|-------|----------|
+| Gemini timeout | Reduce scope, analyze by module |
+| Output incomplete | Retry with focused analysis |
+| No output file | Check directory permissions |
 
-### Fallback Strategy
-- If Gemini fails, generate basic TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from context package
-- Use coverage gaps and framework info to create minimal requirements
-- Provide guidance for manual test planning
+**Fallback Strategy**: Generate basic TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from context package if Gemini fails
 
-## Performance Optimization
+## Integration & Usage
 
-- **Focused Analysis**: Only analyze files with missing tests
-- **Pattern Reuse**: Study existing tests for quick pattern extraction
-- **Parallel Operations**: Load implementation summaries in parallel
-- **Timeout Management**: 20-minute limit for Gemini analysis
+### Command Chain
+- **Called By**: `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4: Analysis)
+- **Requires**: `test-context-package.json` from `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather`
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate`
 
-## Integration
+### Performance
+- Focused analysis: Only analyze files with missing tests
+- Pattern reuse: Study existing tests for quick extraction
+- Timeout: 20-minute limit for analysis
 
-### Called By
-- `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4: Analysis)
-
-### Requires
-- `/workflow:tools:test-context-gather` output (test-context-package.json)
-
-### Followed By
-- `/workflow:tools:test-task-generate` - Generates test task JSON with code-developer invocation
-
-## Success Criteria
-
-- ✅ Valid TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated
-- ✅ All missing tests documented with requirements
-- ✅ Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases
-- ✅ Dependencies and mocks identified
-- ✅ Test generation strategy is actionable
-- ✅ Execution time < 20 minutes
-- ✅ Output follows existing test conventions
+### Success Criteria
+- Valid TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md generated
+- All missing tests documented with actionable requirements
+- Test scenarios cover happy path, errors, edge cases, integration
+- Dependencies and mocks clearly identified
+- Test generation strategy is practical
+- Output follows existing test conventions
 

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-context-gather.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ allowed-tools: Task(*), Read(*), Glob(*)
 
 Orchestrator command that invokes `test-context-search-agent` to gather comprehensive test coverage context for test generation workflows. Generates standardized `test-context-package.json` with coverage analysis, framework detection, and source implementation context.
 
-**Agent**: `test-context-search-agent` (`.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md`)
+
 
 ## Core Philosophy
 
@@ -24,6 +24,36 @@ Orchestrator command that invokes `test-context-search-agent` to gather comprehe
 - **Source Context Loading**: Import implementation summaries from source session
 - **Standardized Output**: Generate `.workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process/test-context-package.json`
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session
+   └─ Validation: test_session_id REQUIRED
+
+Step 1: Test-Context-Package Detection
+   └─ Decision (existing package):
+      ├─ Valid package exists → Return existing (skip execution)
+      └─ No valid package → Continue to Step 2
+
+Step 2: Invoke Test-Context-Search Agent
+   ├─ Phase 1: Session Validation & Source Context Loading
+   │  ├─ Detection: Check for existing test-context-package
+   │  ├─ Test session validation
+   │  └─ Source context loading (summaries, changed files)
+   ├─ Phase 2: Test Coverage Analysis
+   │  ├─ Track 1: Existing test discovery
+   │  ├─ Track 2: Coverage gap analysis
+   │  └─ Track 3: Coverage statistics
+   └─ Phase 3: Framework Detection & Packaging
+      ├─ Framework identification
+      ├─ Convention analysis
+      └─ Generate test-context-package.json
+
+Step 3: Output Verification
+   └─ Verify test-context-package.json created
+```
+
 ## Execution Flow
 
 ### Step 1: Test-Context-Package Detection
@@ -56,9 +86,9 @@ if (file_exists(testContextPath)) {
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="test-context-search-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
   description="Gather test coverage context",
   prompt=`
-You are executing as test-context-search-agent (.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md).
 
 ## Execution Mode
 **PLAN MODE** (Comprehensive) - Full Phase 1-3 execution
@@ -198,7 +228,7 @@ Refer to `test-context-search-agent.md` Phase 3.2 for complete `test-context-pac
 ## Notes
 
 - **Detection-first**: Always check for existing test-context-package before invoking agent
-- **Agent autonomy**: Agent handles all coverage analysis logic per `.claude/agents/test-context-search-agent.md`
+
 - **No redundancy**: This command is a thin orchestrator, all logic in agent
 - **Framework agnostic**: Supports Jest, Mocha, pytest, RSpec, Go testing, etc.
 - **Coverage focus**: Primary goal is identifying implementation files without tests

.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md

@@ -1,416 +1,255 @@
 ---
 name: test-task-generate
-description: Autonomous test-fix task generation using action-planning-agent with test-fix-retest cycle specification and discovery phase
-argument-hint: "[--use-codex] [--cli-execute] --session WFS-test-session-id"
+description: Generate test planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, test task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) using action-planning-agent - produces test planning artifacts, does NOT execute tests
+argument-hint: "--session WFS-test-session-id"
 examples:
   - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --session WFS-test-auth
-  - /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
 ---
 
-# Autonomous Test Task Generation Command
+# Generate Test Planning Documents Command
 
 ## Overview
-Autonomous test-fix task JSON generation using action-planning-agent with two-phase execution: discovery and document generation. Supports both agent-driven execution (default) and CLI tool execution modes. Generates specialized test-fix tasks with comprehensive test-fix-retest cycle specification.
+Generate test planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, test task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) using action-planning-agent. This command produces **test planning artifacts only** - it does NOT execute tests or implement code. Actual test execution requires separate execution command (e.g., /workflow:test-cycle-execute).
 
 ## Core Philosophy
-- **Agent-Driven**: Delegate execution to action-planning-agent for autonomous operation
-- **Two-Phase Flow**: Discovery (context gathering) → Output (document generation)
+- **Planning Only**: Generate test planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) - does NOT execute tests
+- **Agent-Driven Document Generation**: Delegate test plan generation to action-planning-agent
+- **Two-Phase Flow**: Context Preparation (command) → Test Document Generation (agent)
 - **Memory-First**: Reuse loaded documents from conversation memory
-- **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for advanced code analysis and test research
-- **Pre-Selected Templates**: Command selects correct test template based on `--cli-execute` flag **before** invoking agent
-- **Agent Simplicity**: Agent receives pre-selected template and focuses only on content generation
+- **MCP-Enhanced**: Use MCP tools for test pattern research and analysis
 - **Path Clarity**: All `focus_paths` prefer absolute paths (e.g., `D:\\project\\src\\module`), or clear relative paths from project root
-- **Test-First**: Generate comprehensive test coverage before execution
-- **Iterative Refinement**: Test-fix-retest cycle until all tests pass
-- **Surgical Fixes**: Minimal code changes, no refactoring during test fixes
-- **Auto-Revert**: Rollback all changes if max iterations reached
+- **Leverage Existing Test Infrastructure**: Prioritize using established testing frameworks and tools present in the project
 
-## Execution Modes
+## Test-Specific Execution Modes
 
 ### Test Generation (IMPL-001)
-- **Agent Mode (Default)**: @code-developer generates tests within agent context
-- **CLI Execute Mode (`--cli-execute`)**: Use Codex CLI for autonomous test generation
+- **Agent Mode** (default): @code-developer generates tests within agent context
+- **CLI Mode**: Use CLI tools when `command` field present in implementation_approach (determined semantically)
 
-### Test Fix (IMPL-002)
-- **Manual Mode (Default)**: Gemini diagnosis → user applies fixes
-- **Codex Mode (`--use-codex`)**: Gemini diagnosis → Codex applies fixes with resume mechanism
+### Test Execution & Fix (IMPL-002+)
+- **Agent Mode** (default): Gemini diagnosis → agent applies fixes
+- **CLI Mode**: Gemini diagnosis → CLI applies fixes (when `command` field present in implementation_approach)
 
-## Execution Lifecycle
+## Execution Process
 
-### Phase 1: Discovery & Context Loading
-**⚡ Memory-First Rule**: Skip file loading if documents already in conversation memory
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session
+   └─ Validation: session_id REQUIRED
 
-**Agent Context Package**:
-```javascript
-{
-  "session_id": "WFS-test-[session-id]",
-  "execution_mode": "agent-mode" | "cli-execute-mode",  // Determined by flag
-  "task_json_template_path": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt"
-                           | "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt",
-  // Path selected by command based on --cli-execute flag, agent reads it
-  "workflow_type": "test_session",
-  "use_codex": true | false,  // Determined by --use-codex flag
-  "session_metadata": {
-    // If in memory: use cached content
-    // Else: Load from .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json
-  },
-  "test_analysis_results_path": ".workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
-  "test_analysis_results": {
-    // If in memory: use cached content
-    // Else: Load from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-  },
-  "test_context_package_path": ".workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json",
-  "test_context_package": {
-    // Existing test patterns and coverage analysis
-  },
-  "source_session_id": "[source-session-id]",  // if exists
-  "source_session_summaries": {
-    // Implementation context from source session
-  },
-  "mcp_capabilities": {
-    "code_index": true,
-    "exa_code": true,
-    "exa_web": true
-  }
-}
+Phase 1: Context Preparation (Command)
+   ├─ Assemble test session paths
+   │  ├─ session_metadata_path
+   │  ├─ test_analysis_results_path (REQUIRED)
+   │  └─ test_context_package_path
+   └─ Provide metadata (session_id, source_session_id)
+
+Phase 2: Test Document Generation (Agent)
+   ├─ Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md as primary requirements source
+   ├─ Generate Test Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+   │  ├─ IMPL-001: Test generation (meta.type: "test-gen")
+   │  └─ IMPL-002+: Test execution & fix (meta.type: "test-fix")
+   ├─ Create IMPL_PLAN.md (test_session variant)
+   └─ Generate TODO_LIST.md with test phase indicators
 ```
 
-**Discovery Actions**:
-1. **Load Test Session Context** (if not in memory)
-   ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("workflow-session.json")) {
-     Read(.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json)
-   }
-   ```
+## Document Generation Lifecycle
 
-2. **Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md** (if not in memory, REQUIRED)
-   ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")) {
-     Read(.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md)
-   }
-   ```
+### Phase 1: Context Preparation (Command Responsibility)
 
-3. **Load Test Context Package** (if not in memory)
-   ```javascript
-   if (!memory.has("test-context-package.json")) {
-     Read(.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json)
-   }
-   ```
+**Command prepares test session paths and metadata for planning document generation.**
 
-4. **Load Source Session Summaries** (if source_session_id exists)
-   ```javascript
-   if (sessionMetadata.source_session_id) {
-     const summaryFiles = Bash("find .workflow/active/{source-session-id}/.summaries/ -name 'IMPL-*-summary.md'")
-     summaryFiles.forEach(file => Read(file))
-   }
-   ```
-
-5. **Code Analysis with Native Tools** (optional - enhance understanding)
-   ```bash
-   # Find test files and patterns
-   find . -name "*test*" -type f
-   rg "describe|it\(|test\(" -g "*.ts"
-   ```
-
-6. **MCP External Research** (optional - gather test best practices)
-   ```javascript
-   // Get external test examples and patterns
-   mcp__exa__get_code_context_exa(
-     query="TypeScript test generation best practices jest",
-     tokensNum="dynamic"
-   )
-   ```
-
-### Phase 2: Agent Execution (Document Generation)
-
-**Pre-Agent Template Selection** (Command decides path before invoking agent):
-```javascript
-// Command checks flag and selects template PATH (not content)
-const templatePath = hasCliExecuteFlag
-  ? "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-cli-mode.txt"
-  : "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/task-json-agent-mode.txt";
+**Test Session Path Structure**:
 ```
+.workflow/active/WFS-test-{session-id}/
+├── workflow-session.json          # Test session metadata
+├── .process/
+│   ├── TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md   # Test requirements and strategy
+│   ├── test-context-package.json  # Test patterns and coverage
+│   └── context-package.json       # General context artifacts
+├── .task/                         # Output: Test task JSON files
+├── IMPL_PLAN.md                   # Output: Test implementation plan
+└── TODO_LIST.md                   # Output: Test TODO list
+```
+
+**Command Preparation**:
+1. **Assemble Test Session Paths** for agent prompt:
+   - `session_metadata_path`
+   - `test_analysis_results_path` (REQUIRED)
+   - `test_context_package_path`
+   - Output directory paths
+
+2. **Provide Metadata** (simple values):
+   - `session_id`
+   - `source_session_id` (if exists)
+   - `mcp_capabilities` (available MCP tools)
+
+**Note**: CLI tool usage is now determined semantically from user's task description, not by flags.
+
+### Phase 2: Test Document Generation (Agent Responsibility)
+
+**Purpose**: Generate test-specific IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, and TODO_LIST.md - planning documents only, NOT test execution.
 
 **Agent Invocation**:
 ```javascript
 Task(
   subagent_type="action-planning-agent",
-  description="Generate test-fix task JSON and implementation plan",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Generate test planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md)",
   prompt=`
-## Execution Context
+## TASK OBJECTIVE
+Generate test planning documents (IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md) for test workflow session
 
-**Session ID**: WFS-test-{session-id}
-**Workflow Type**: Test Session
-**Execution Mode**: {agent-mode | cli-execute-mode}
-**Task JSON Template Path**: {template_path}
-**Use Codex**: {true | false}
+IMPORTANT: This is TEST PLANNING ONLY - you are generating planning documents, NOT executing tests.
 
-## Phase 1: Discovery Results (Provided Context)
+CRITICAL:
+- Use existing test frameworks and utilities from the project
+- Follow the progressive loading strategy defined in your agent specification (load context incrementally from memory-first approach)
 
-### Test Session Metadata
-{session_metadata_content}
-- source_session_id: {source_session_id} (if exists)
-- workflow_type: "test_session"
+## AGENT CONFIGURATION REFERENCE
 
-### TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (REQUIRED)
-{test_analysis_results_content}
-- Coverage Assessment
-- Test Framework & Conventions
-- Test Requirements by File
-- Test Generation Strategy
-- Implementation Targets
-- Success Criteria
+Refer to your specification for:
+- Test Task JSON Schema (6-field structure with test-specific metadata)
+- Test IMPL_PLAN.md Structure (test_session variant with test-fix cycle)
+- TODO_LIST.md Format (with test phase indicators)
+- Progressive Loading Strategy (memory-first, load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md as primary source)
+- Quality Validation Rules (task count limits, requirement quantification)
 
-### Test Context Package
-{test_context_package_summary}
-- Existing test patterns, framework config, coverage analysis
+## SESSION PATHS
+Input:
+  - Session Metadata: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/workflow-session.json
+  - TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md (REQUIRED - primary requirements source)
+  - Test Context Package: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/test-context-package.json
+  - Context Package: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/context-package.json
+  - Source Session Summaries: .workflow/active/{source-session-id}/.summaries/IMPL-*.md (if exists)
 
-### Source Session Implementation Context (Optional)
-{source_session_summaries}
-- Implementation context from completed session
+Output:
+  - Task Dir: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.task/
+  - IMPL_PLAN: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md
+  - TODO_LIST: .workflow/active/{test-session-id}/TODO_LIST.md
 
-### MCP Analysis Results (Optional)
-**Code Structure**: {mcp_code_index_results}
-**External Research**: {mcp_exa_research_results}
+## CONTEXT METADATA
+Session ID: {test-session-id}
+Workflow Type: test_session
+Source Session: {source-session-id} (if exists)
+MCP Capabilities: {exa_code, exa_web, code_index}
 
-## Phase 2: Test Task Document Generation
+## CLI TOOL SELECTION
+Determine CLI tool usage per-step based on user's task description:
+- If user specifies "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen for X" → Add command field to relevant steps
+- Default: Agent execution (no command field) unless user explicitly requests CLI
 
-**Agent Configuration Reference**: All test task generation rules, test-fix cycle structure, quality standards, and execution details are defined in action-planning-agent.
+## TEST-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
+(Detailed specifications in your agent definition)
 
-Refer to: @.claude/agents/action-planning-agent.md for:
-- Test Task Decomposition Standards
-- Test-Fix-Retest Cycle Requirements
-- 5-Field Task JSON Schema
-- IMPL_PLAN.md Structure (Test variant)
-- TODO_LIST.md Format
-- Test Execution Flow & Quality Validation
+### Task Structure Requirements
+- Minimum 2 tasks: IMPL-001 (test generation) + IMPL-002 (test execution & fix)
+- Expandable for complex projects: Add IMPL-003+ (per-module, integration, E2E tests)
 
-### Test-Specific Requirements Summary
+Task Configuration:
+  IMPL-001 (Test Generation):
+    - meta.type: "test-gen"
+    - meta.agent: "@code-developer"
+    - meta.test_framework: Specify existing framework (e.g., "jest", "vitest", "pytest")
+    - flow_control: Test generation strategy from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+    - CLI execution: Add `command` field when user requests (determined semantically)
 
-#### Task Structure Philosophy
-- **Minimum 2 tasks**: IMPL-001 (test generation) + IMPL-002 (test execution & fix)
-- **Expandable**: Add IMPL-003+ for complex projects (per-module, integration, etc.)
-- IMPL-001: Uses @code-developer or CLI execution
-- IMPL-002: Uses @test-fix-agent with iterative fix cycle
+  IMPL-002+ (Test Execution & Fix):
+    - meta.type: "test-fix"
+    - meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"
+    - flow_control: Test-fix cycle with iteration limits and diagnosis configuration
+    - CLI execution: Add `command` field when user requests (determined semantically)
 
-#### Test-Fix Cycle Configuration
-- **Max Iterations**: 5 (for IMPL-002)
-- **Diagnosis Tool**: Gemini with bug-fix template
-- **Fix Application**: Manual (default) or Codex (if --use-codex flag)
-- **Cycle Pattern**: test → gemini_diagnose → manual_fix (or codex) → retest
-- **Exit Conditions**: All tests pass OR max iterations reached (auto-revert)
+### Test-Fix Cycle Specification (IMPL-002+)
+Required flow_control fields:
+  - max_iterations: 5
+  - diagnosis_tool: "gemini"
+  - diagnosis_template: "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt"
+  - cycle_pattern: "test → gemini_diagnose → fix → retest"
+  - exit_conditions: ["all_tests_pass", "max_iterations_reached"]
+  - auto_revert_on_failure: true
+  - CLI fix: Add `command` field when user specifies CLI tool usage
 
-#### Required Outputs Summary
+### Automation Framework Configuration
+Select automation tools based on test requirements from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md:
+- UI interaction testing → E2E browser automation (meta.e2e_framework)
+- API/database integration → integration test tools (meta.test_tools)
+- Performance metrics → load testing tools (meta.perf_framework)
+- Logic verification → unit test framework (meta.test_framework)
 
-##### 1. Test Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
-- **Location**: `.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.task/`
-- **Template**: Read from `{template_path}` (pre-selected by command based on `--cli-execute` flag)
-- **Schema**: 5-field structure with test-specific metadata
-  - IMPL-001: `meta.type: "test-gen"`, `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`
-  - IMPL-002: `meta.type: "test-fix"`, `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`, `meta.use_codex: {use_codex}`
-  - `flow_control`: Test generation approach (IMPL-001) or test-fix cycle (IMPL-002)
-- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Test Task JSON Generation
+**Tool Selection**: Detect from project config > suggest based on requirements
 
-##### 2. IMPL_PLAN.md (Test Variant)
-- **Location**: `.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/IMPL_PLAN.md`
-- **Template**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/impl-plan-template.txt`
-- **Test-Specific Frontmatter**: workflow_type="test_session", test_framework, source_session_id
-- **Test-Fix-Retest Cycle Section**: Iterative fix cycle with Gemini diagnosis
-- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § Test Implementation Plan Creation
+### TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md Mapping
+PRIMARY requirements source - extract and map to task JSONs:
+  - Test framework config → meta.test_framework (use existing framework from project)
+  - Existing test utilities → flow_control.reusable_test_tools (discovered test helpers, fixtures, mocks)
+  - Test runner commands → flow_control.test_commands (from package.json or pytest config)
+  - Coverage targets → meta.coverage_target
+  - Test requirements → context.requirements (quantified with explicit counts)
+  - Test generation strategy → IMPL-001 flow_control.implementation_approach
+  - Implementation targets → context.files_to_test (absolute paths)
 
-##### 3. TODO_LIST.md
-- **Location**: `.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/TODO_LIST.md`
-- **Format**: Task list with test generation and execution phases
-- **Status**: [ ] (pending), [x] (completed)
-- **Details**: See action-planning-agent.md § TODO List Generation
+## EXPECTED DELIVERABLES
+1. Test Task JSON Files (.task/IMPL-*.json)
+   - 6-field schema with quantified requirements from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+   - Test-specific metadata: type, agent, test_framework, coverage_target
+   - flow_control includes: reusable_test_tools, test_commands (from project config)
+   - CLI execution via `command` field when user requests (determined semantically)
+   - Artifact references from test-context-package.json
+   - Absolute paths in context.files_to_test
 
-### Agent Execution Summary
+2. Test Implementation Plan (IMPL_PLAN.md)
+   - Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/impl-plan-template.txt
+   - Test-specific frontmatter: workflow_type="test_session", test_framework, source_session_id
+   - Test-Fix-Retest Cycle section with diagnosis configuration
+   - Source session context integration (if applicable)
 
-**Key Steps** (Detailed instructions in action-planning-agent.md):
-1. Load task JSON template from provided path
-2. Parse TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md for test requirements
-3. Generate IMPL-001 (test generation) task JSON
-4. Generate IMPL-002 (test execution & fix) task JSON with use_codex flag
-5. Generate additional IMPL-*.json if project complexity requires
-6. Create IMPL_PLAN.md using test template variant
-7. Generate TODO_LIST.md with test task indicators
-8. Update session state with test metadata
+3. TODO List (TODO_LIST.md)
+   - Hierarchical structure with test phase containers
+   - Links to task JSONs with status markers
+   - Matches task JSON hierarchy
 
-**Quality Gates** (Full checklist in action-planning-agent.md):
-- ✓ Minimum 2 tasks created (IMPL-001 + IMPL-002)
-- ✓ IMPL-001 has test generation approach from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- ✓ IMPL-002 has test-fix cycle with correct use_codex flag
-- ✓ Test framework configuration integrated
-- ✓ Source session context referenced (if exists)
-- ✓ MCP tool integration added
-- ✓ Documents follow test template structure
+## QUALITY STANDARDS
+Hard Constraints:
+  - Task count: minimum 2, maximum 18
+  - All requirements quantified from TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+  - Test framework matches existing project framework
+  - flow_control includes reusable_test_tools and test_commands from project
+  - Absolute paths for all focus_paths
+  - Acceptance criteria include verification commands
+  - CLI `command` field added only when user explicitly requests CLI tool usage
 
-## Output
-
-Generate all three documents and report completion status:
-- Test task JSON files created: N files (minimum 2)
-- Test requirements integrated: TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-- Test context integrated: existing patterns and coverage
-- Source session context: {source_session_id} summaries (if exists)
-- MCP enhancements: code-index, exa-research
-- Session ready for test execution: /workflow:execute or /workflow:test-cycle-execute
+## SUCCESS CRITERIA
+- All test planning documents generated successfully
+- Return completion status: task count, test framework, coverage targets, source session status
 `
 )
 ```
 
-### Agent Context Passing
-
-**Memory-Aware Context Assembly**:
-```javascript
-// Assemble context package for agent
-const agentContext = {
-  session_id: "WFS-test-[id]",
-  workflow_type: "test_session",
-  use_codex: hasUseCodexFlag,
-
-  // Use memory if available, else load
-  session_metadata: memory.has("workflow-session.json")
-    ? memory.get("workflow-session.json")
-    : Read(.workflow/active/WFS-test-[id]/workflow-session.json),
-
-  test_analysis_results_path: ".workflow/active/WFS-test-[id]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md",
-
-  test_analysis_results: memory.has("TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
-    ? memory.get("TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md")
-    : Read(".workflow/active/WFS-test-[id]/.process/TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md"),
-
-  test_context_package_path: ".workflow/active/WFS-test-[id]/.process/test-context-package.json",
-
-  test_context_package: memory.has("test-context-package.json")
-    ? memory.get("test-context-package.json")
-    : Read(".workflow/active/WFS-test-[id]/.process/test-context-package.json"),
-
-  // Load source session summaries if exists
-  source_session_id: session_metadata.source_session_id || null,
-
-  source_session_summaries: session_metadata.source_session_id
-    ? loadSourceSummaries(session_metadata.source_session_id)
-    : null,
-
-  // Optional MCP enhancements
-  mcp_analysis: executeMcpDiscovery()
-}
-```
-
-## Test Task Structure Reference
-
-This section provides quick reference for test task JSON structure. For complete implementation details, see the agent invocation prompt in Phase 2 above.
-
-**Quick Reference**:
-- Minimum 2 tasks: IMPL-001 (test-gen) + IMPL-002 (test-fix)
-- Expandable for complex projects (IMPL-003+)
-- IMPL-001: `meta.agent: "@code-developer"`, test generation approach
-- IMPL-002: `meta.agent: "@test-fix-agent"`, `meta.use_codex: {flag}`, test-fix cycle
-- See Phase 2 agent prompt for full schema and requirements
-
-## Output Files Structure
-```
-.workflow/active/WFS-test-[session]/
-├── workflow-session.json           # Test session metadata
-├── IMPL_PLAN.md                    # Test validation plan
-├── TODO_LIST.md                    # Progress tracking
-├── .task/
-│   └── IMPL-001.json               # Test-fix task with cycle spec
-├── .process/
-│   ├── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md         # From concept-enhanced (optional)
-│   ├── context-package.json        # From context-gather
-│   ├── initial-test.log            # Phase 1: Initial test results
-│   ├── fix-iteration-1-diagnosis.md # Gemini diagnosis iteration 1
-│   ├── fix-iteration-1-changes.log  # Codex changes iteration 1
-│   ├── fix-iteration-1-retest.log   # Retest results iteration 1
-│   ├── fix-iteration-N-*.md/log    # Subsequent iterations
-│   └── final-test.log              # Phase 3: Final validation
-└── .summaries/
-    └── IMPL-001-summary.md         # Success report OR failure report
-```
-
-## Error Handling
-
-### Input Validation Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| Not a test session | Missing workflow_type: "test_session" | Verify session created by test-gen |
-| Source session not found | Invalid source_session_id | Check source session exists |
-| No implementation summaries | Source session incomplete | Ensure source session has completed tasks |
-
-### Test Framework Discovery Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| No test command found | Unknown framework | Manual test command specification |
-| No test files found | Tests not written | Request user to write tests first |
-| Test dependencies missing | Incomplete setup | Run dependency installation |
-
-### Generation Errors
-| Error | Cause | Resolution |
-|-------|-------|------------|
-| Invalid JSON structure | Template error | Fix task generation logic |
-| Missing required fields | Incomplete metadata | Validate session metadata |
-
 ## Integration & Usage
 
 ### Command Chain
 - **Called By**: `/workflow:test-gen` (Phase 4), `/workflow:test-fix-gen` (Phase 4)
-- **Invokes**: `action-planning-agent` for autonomous task generation
-- **Followed By**: `/workflow:execute` or `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` (user-triggered)
+- **Invokes**: `action-planning-agent` for test planning document generation
+- **Followed By**: `/workflow:test-cycle-execute` or `/workflow:execute` (user-triggered)
 
-### Basic Usage
+### Usage Examples
 ```bash
-# Agent mode (default, autonomous execution)
+# Standard execution
 /workflow:tools:test-task-generate --session WFS-test-auth
 
-# With automated Codex fixes for IMPL-002
-/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
-
-# CLI execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation
-/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --session WFS-test-auth
-
-# Both flags combined
-/workflow:tools:test-task-generate --cli-execute --use-codex --session WFS-test-auth
+# With semantic CLI request (include in task description)
+# e.g., "Generate tests, use Codex for implementation and fixes"
 ```
 
-### Execution Modes
-- **Agent mode** (default): Uses `action-planning-agent` with agent-mode task template
-- **CLI mode** (`--cli-execute`): Uses Gemini/Qwen/Codex with cli-mode task template for IMPL-001
-- **Codex fixes** (`--use-codex`): Enables automated fixes in IMPL-002 task
-
-### Flag Behavior
-- **No flags**: `meta.use_codex=false` (manual fixes), agent-mode generation
-- **--use-codex**: `meta.use_codex=true` (Codex automated fixes with resume mechanism in IMPL-002)
-- **--cli-execute**: Uses CLI tool execution mode for IMPL-001 test generation
-- **Both flags**: CLI generation + automated Codex fixes
+### CLI Tool Selection
+CLI tool usage is determined semantically from user's task description:
+- Include "use Codex" for automated fixes
+- Include "use Gemini" for analysis
+- Default: Agent execution (no `command` field)
 
 ### Output
-- Test task JSON files in `.task/` directory (minimum 2: IMPL-001.json + IMPL-002.json)
-- IMPL_PLAN.md with test generation and fix cycle strategy
-- TODO_LIST.md with test task indicators
-- Session state updated with test metadata
-- MCP enhancements integrated (if available)
-
-## Agent Execution Notes
-
-The `@test-fix-agent` will execute the task by following the `flow_control.implementation_approach` specification:
-
-1. **Load task JSON**: Read complete test-fix task from `.task/IMPL-002.json`
-2. **Check meta.use_codex**: Determine fix mode (manual or automated)
-3. **Execute pre_analysis**: Load source context, discover framework, analyze tests
-4. **Phase 1**: Run initial test suite
-5. **Phase 2**: If failures, enter iterative loop:
-   - Use Gemini for diagnosis (analysis mode with bug-fix template)
-   - Check meta.use_codex flag:
-     - If false (default): Present fix suggestions to user for manual application
-     - If true (--use-codex): Use Codex resume for automated fixes (maintains context)
-   - Retest and check for regressions
-   - Repeat max 5 times
-6. **Phase 3**: Generate summary and certify code
-7. **Error Recovery**: Revert changes if max iterations reached
-
-**Bug Diagnosis Template**: Uses `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/01-diagnose-bug-root-cause.txt` template for systematic root cause analysis, code path tracing, and targeted fix recommendations.
-
-**Codex Usage**: The agent uses `codex exec "..." resume --last` pattern ONLY when meta.use_codex=true (--use-codex flag present) to maintain conversation context across multiple fix iterations, ensuring consistency and learning from previous attempts.
+- Test task JSON files in `.task/` directory (minimum 2)
+- IMPL_PLAN.md with test strategy and fix cycle specification
+- TODO_LIST.md with test phase indicators
+- Session ready for test execution

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/animation-extract.md

@@ -23,6 +23,44 @@ Extract animation and transition patterns from prompt inference and image refere
 - **Production-Ready**: CSS var() format, WCAG-compliant, semantic naming
 - **Default Behavior**: Non-interactive mode uses inferred patterns + best practices
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --design-id, --session, --images, --focus, --interactive, --refine
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --refine flag → Refinement Mode
+      └─ No --refine → Exploration Mode
+
+Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Detect input mode & base path
+   ├─ Step 2: Prepare image references (if available)
+   ├─ Step 3: Load design tokens context
+   └─ Step 4: Memory check (skip if exists)
+
+Phase 1: Animation Specification Generation
+   ├─ Step 1: Load project context
+   ├─ Step 2: Generate animation specification options (Agent Task 1)
+   │  └─ Decision:
+   │     ├─ Exploration Mode → Generate specification questions
+   │     └─ Refinement Mode → Generate refinement options
+   └─ Step 3: Verify options file created
+
+Phase 1.5: User Confirmation (Optional)
+   └─ Decision (--interactive flag):
+      ├─ --interactive present → Present options, capture selection
+      └─ No --interactive → Skip to Phase 2
+
+Phase 2: Animation System Generation
+   ├─ Step 1: Load user selection or use defaults
+   ├─ Step 2: Create output directory
+   └─ Step 3: Launch animation generation task (Agent Task 2)
+
+Phase 3: Verify Output
+   ├─ Step 1: Check files created
+   └─ Step 2: Verify file sizes
+```
+
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Detect Input Mode & Base Path
@@ -120,11 +158,7 @@ ELSE:
 - Infers animation patterns from UI element positioning and design style
 - Generates context-aware animation specifications based on visual analysis
 
-**Benefits**:
-- ✅ Flexible input - works with screenshots, mockups, or design files
-- ✅ AI-driven inference from visual cues
-- ✅ No external dependencies on MCP tools
-- ✅ Combines visual analysis with industry best practices
+
 
 ### Step 3: Load Design Tokens Context
 

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/codify-style.md

@@ -480,11 +480,7 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 //    - Orchestrator's own task (no SlashCommand attachment)
 //    - Mark Phase 3 as completed
 //    - Final state: All 4 orchestrator tasks completed
-//
-// Benefits:
-// ✓ Real-time visibility into attached tasks during execution
-// ✓ Clean orchestrator-level summary after tasks complete
-// ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
+
 // ✓ Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
 ```
 
@@ -623,17 +619,7 @@ File discovery is fully automatic - no glob patterns needed.
 
 ---
 
-## Benefits
 
-- **Simplified Interface**: Single path parameter with intelligent defaults
-- **Auto-Generation**: Package names auto-generated from directory names
-- **Automatic Discovery**: No need to specify file patterns - finds all style files automatically
-- **Pure Orchestrator**: No direct agent execution, delegates to specialized commands
-- **Auto-Continue**: Autonomous 4-phase execution without user interaction
-- **Safety First**: Overwrite protection, validation checks, error handling
-- **Code Reuse**: Leverages existing `import-from-code` and `reference-page-generator` commands
-- **Clean Separation**: Each command has single responsibility
-- **Easy Maintenance**: Changes to sub-commands automatically apply
 
 ## Architecture
 

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/design-sync.md

@@ -19,6 +19,48 @@ Synchronize finalized design system references to brainstorming artifacts, prepa
 - **Plan-Ready Output**: Ensure design artifacts discoverable by task-generate
 - **Minimal Reading**: Verify file existence, don't read design content
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --session, --selected-prototypes
+   └─ Validation: session_id REQUIRED
+
+Phase 1: Session & Artifact Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Validate session exists
+   ├─ Step 2: Find latest design run
+   ├─ Step 3: Detect design system structure
+   └─ Step 4: Select prototypes (--selected-prototypes OR all)
+
+Phase 1.1: Memory Check (Conditional)
+   └─ Decision (current design run in synthesis):
+      ├─ Already updated → Skip Phase 2-5, EXIT
+      └─ Not found → Continue to Phase 2
+
+Phase 2: Load Target Artifacts
+   ├─ Read role analysis documents (files to update)
+   ├─ Read ui-designer/analysis.md (if exists)
+   └─ Read prototype notes (minimal context)
+
+Phase 3: Update Synthesis Specification
+   └─ Edit role analysis documents with UI/UX Guidelines section
+
+Phase 4A: Update Relevant Role Analysis Documents
+   ├─ ui-designer/analysis.md (always)
+   ├─ ux-expert/analysis.md (if animations exist)
+   ├─ system-architect/analysis.md (if layouts exist)
+   └─ product-manager/analysis.md (if prototypes)
+
+Phase 4B: Create UI Designer Design System Reference
+   └─ Write ui-designer/design-system-reference.md
+
+Phase 5: Update Context Package
+   └─ Update context-package.json with design system references
+
+Phase 6: Completion
+   └─ Report updated artifacts
+```
+
 ## Execution Protocol
 
 ### Phase 1: Session & Artifact Validation

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/explore-auto.md

@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 6. **Phase 10 (ui-assembly)** → **Attach tasks → Execute → Collapse** → Workflow complete
 
 **Phase Transition Mechanism**:
-- **Phase 5 (User Interaction)**: User confirms targets → IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 7
-- **Phase 7-10 (Autonomous)**: `SlashCommand` invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow
+- **Phase 5 (User Interaction)**: User confirms targets → IMMEDIATELY executes Phase 7
+- **Phase 7-10 (Autonomous)**: SlashCommand execute **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow
 - **Task Execution**: Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself
 - **Task Collapse**: After tasks complete, collapse them into phase summary
 - **Phase Transition**: Automatically execute next phase after collapsing
@@ -36,10 +36,55 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 
 **Auto-Continue Mechanism**: TodoWrite tracks phase status with dynamic task attachment/collapse. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them, restore phase summary, and execute the next phase. No user intervention required. The workflow is NOT complete until Phase 10 (UI assembly) finishes.
 
-**Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation is NOT delegation - it's task expansion. The orchestrator executes these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
+**Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand execute is NOT delegation - it's task expansion. The orchestrator executes these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
 
 **Target Type Detection**: Automatically inferred from prompt/targets, or explicitly set via `--target-type`.
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --input, --targets, --target-type, --device-type, --session, --style-variants, --layout-variants
+   └─ Decision (input detection):
+      ├─ Contains * or glob matches → images_input (visual)
+      ├─ File/directory exists → code import source
+      └─ Pure text → design prompt
+
+Phase 1-4: Parameter Parsing & Initialization
+   ├─ Phase 1: Normalize parameters (legacy deprecation warning)
+   ├─ Phase 2: Intelligent prompt parsing (extract variant counts)
+   ├─ Phase 3: Device type inference (explicit > keywords > target_type > default)
+   └─ Phase 4: Run initialization and directory setup
+
+Phase 5: Unified Target Inference
+   ├─ Priority: --pages/--components (legacy) → --targets → prompt analysis → synthesis → default
+   ├─ Display confirmation with modification options
+   └─ User confirms → IMMEDIATELY triggers Phase 7
+
+Phase 6: Code Import (Conditional)
+   └─ Decision (design_source):
+      ├─ code_only | hybrid → Execute /workflow:ui-design:import-from-code
+      └─ visual_only → Skip to Phase 7
+
+Phase 7: Style Extraction
+   └─ Decision (needs_visual_supplement):
+      ├─ visual_only OR supplement needed → Execute /workflow:ui-design:style-extract
+      └─ code_only AND style_complete → Use code import
+
+Phase 8: Animation Extraction
+   └─ Decision (should_extract_animation):
+      ├─ visual_only OR incomplete OR regenerate → Execute /workflow:ui-design:animation-extract
+      └─ code_only AND animation_complete → Use code import
+
+Phase 9: Layout Extraction
+   └─ Decision (needs_visual_supplement OR NOT layout_complete):
+      ├─ True → Execute /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract
+      └─ False → Use code import
+
+Phase 10: UI Assembly
+   └─ Execute /workflow:ui-design:generate → Workflow complete
+```
+
 ## Core Rules
 
 1. **Start Immediately**: TodoWrite initialization → Phase 7 execution
@@ -47,7 +92,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Bash(*), Glob(*), Write(*
 3. **Parse & Pass**: Extract data from each output for next phase
 4. **Default to All**: When selecting variants/prototypes, use ALL generated items
 5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
-6. **⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Attachment Model** - SlashCommand invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion. This is NOT delegation - it's task expansion.
+6. **⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Attachment Model** - SlashCommand execute **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion. This is NOT delegation - it's task expansion.
 7. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP** - This is a continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them and execute the next phase. Workflow is NOT complete until Phase 10 (UI assembly) finishes.
 
 ## Parameter Requirements
@@ -310,13 +355,16 @@ detect_target_type(target_list):
 ```
 
 ### Phase 6: Code Import & Completeness Assessment (Conditional)
-```bash
+
+**Step 6.1: Execute** - Import design system from code files
+
+```javascript
 IF design_source IN ["code_only", "hybrid"]:
     REPORT: "🔍 Phase 6: Code Import ({design_source})"
     command = "/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code --design-id \"{design_id}\" --source \"{code_base_path}\""
 
     TRY:
-        # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES import-from-code's tasks to current workflow
+        # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES import-from-code's tasks to current workflow
         # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself:
         #   - Phase 0: Discover and categorize code files
         #   - Phase 1.1-1.3: Style/Animation/Layout Agent extraction
@@ -420,7 +468,10 @@ IF design_source IN ["code_only", "hybrid"]:
 ```
 
 ### Phase 7: Style Extraction
-```bash
+
+**Step 7.1: Execute** - Extract style design systems
+
+```javascript
 IF design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement:
     REPORT: "🎨 Phase 7: Style Extraction (variants: {style_variants})"
     command = "/workflow:ui-design:style-extract --design-id \"{design_id}\" " +
@@ -428,7 +479,7 @@ IF design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement:
               (prompt_text ? "--prompt \"{prompt_text}\" " : "") +
               "--variants {style_variants} --interactive"
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES style-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES style-extract's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(command)
 
@@ -438,7 +489,10 @@ ELSE:
 ```
 
 ### Phase 8: Animation Extraction
-```bash
+
+**Step 8.1: Execute** - Extract animation patterns
+
+```javascript
 # Determine if animation extraction is needed
 should_extract_animation = false
 
@@ -468,7 +522,7 @@ IF should_extract_animation:
 
     command = " ".join(command_parts)
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES animation-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES animation-extract's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(command)
 
@@ -481,7 +535,10 @@ ELSE:
 ```
 
 ### Phase 9: Layout Extraction
-```bash
+
+**Step 9.1: Execute** - Extract layout templates
+
+```javascript
 targets_string = ",".join(inferred_target_list)
 
 IF (design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement) OR (NOT layout_complete):
@@ -491,7 +548,7 @@ IF (design_source == "visual_only" OR needs_visual_supplement) OR (NOT layout_co
               (prompt_text ? "--prompt \"{prompt_text}\" " : "") +
               "--targets \"{targets_string}\" --variants {layout_variants} --device-type \"{device_type}\" --interactive"
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES layout-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES layout-extract's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(command)
 
@@ -501,7 +558,10 @@ ELSE:
 ```
 
 ### Phase 10: UI Assembly
-```bash
+
+**Step 10.1: Execute** - Assemble UI prototypes from design tokens and layout templates
+
+```javascript
 command = "/workflow:ui-design:generate --design-id \"{design_id}\"" + (--session ? " --session {session_id}" : "")
 
 total = style_variants × layout_variants × len(inferred_target_list)
@@ -511,7 +571,7 @@ REPORT: "   → Pure assembly: Combining layout templates + design tokens"
 REPORT: "   → Device: {device_type} (from layout templates)"
 REPORT: "   → Assembly tasks: {total} combinations"
 
-# SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES generate's tasks to current workflow
+# SlashCommand execute ATTACHES generate's tasks to current workflow
 # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
 SlashCommand(command)
 
@@ -528,32 +588,35 @@ SlashCommand(command)
 ```javascript
 // Initialize IMMEDIATELY after Phase 5 user confirmation to track multi-phase execution (4 orchestrator-level tasks)
 TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {"content": "Execute style extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
-  {"content": "Execute animation extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
-  {"content": "Execute layout extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing layout extraction"},
-  {"content": "Execute UI assembly", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI assembly"}
+  {"content": "Phase 7: Style Extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+  {"content": "Phase 8: Animation Extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
+  {"content": "Phase 9: Layout Extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing layout extraction"},
+  {"content": "Phase 10: UI Assembly", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing UI assembly"}
 ]})
 
 // ⚠️ CRITICAL: Dynamic TodoWrite task attachment strategy:
 //
-// **Key Concept**: SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES tasks to current workflow.
+// **Key Concept**: SlashCommand execute ATTACHES tasks to current workflow.
 // Orchestrator EXECUTES these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
 //
-// Phase 7-10 SlashCommand Invocation Pattern:
-// 1. SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES sub-command tasks to TodoWrite
-// 2. TodoWrite expands to include attached tasks
-// 3. Orchestrator EXECUTES attached tasks sequentially
-// 4. After all attached tasks complete, COLLAPSE them into phase summary
-// 5. Update next phase to in_progress
-// 6. IMMEDIATELY execute next phase (auto-continue)
-// 7. After Phase 10 completes, workflow finishes (generate command handles preview files)
+// Phase 7-10 SlashCommand Execute Pattern (when tasks are attached):
+// Example - Phase 7 with sub-tasks:
+// [
+//   {"content": "Phase 7: Style Extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+//   {"content": "  → Analyze style references", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing style references"},
+//   {"content": "  → Generate style variants", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating style variants"},
+//   {"content": "  → Create design tokens", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating design tokens"},
+//   {"content": "Phase 8: Animation Extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
+//   ...
+// ]
+//
+// After sub-tasks complete, COLLAPSE back to:
+// [
+//   {"content": "Phase 7: Style Extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing style extraction"},
+//   {"content": "Phase 8: Animation Extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing animation extraction"},
+//   ...
+// ]
 //
-// Benefits:
-// ✓ Real-time visibility into sub-command task progress
-// ✓ Clean orchestrator-level summary after each phase
-// ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
-// ✓ Generate command handles preview generation autonomously
-// ✓ Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
 ```
 
 ## Completion Output

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/generate.md

@@ -21,6 +21,36 @@ Pure assembler that combines pre-extracted layout templates with design tokens t
 - `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` → Complete design systems (design-tokens.json + style-guide.md)
 - `/workflow:ui-design:layout-extract` → Layout structure
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --design-id, --session
+   └─ Decision (base path resolution):
+      ├─ --design-id provided → Exact match by design ID
+      ├─ --session provided → Latest in session
+      └─ No flags → Latest globally
+
+Phase 1: Setup & Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Resolve base path & parse configuration
+   ├─ Step 2: Load layout templates
+   ├─ Step 3: Validate design tokens
+   └─ Step 4: Load animation tokens (optional)
+
+Phase 2: Assembly (Agent)
+   ├─ Step 1: Calculate agent grouping plan
+   │  └─ Grouping rules:
+   │     ├─ Style isolation: Each agent processes ONE style
+   │     ├─ Balanced distribution: Layouts evenly split
+   │     └─ Max 10 layouts per agent, max 6 concurrent agents
+   ├─ Step 2: Launch batched assembly tasks (parallel)
+   └─ Step 3: Verify generated files
+
+Phase 3: Generate Preview Files
+   ├─ Step 1: Run preview generation script
+   └─ Step 2: Verify preview files
+```
+
 ## Phase 1: Setup & Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Resolve Base Path & Parse Configuration
@@ -290,7 +320,7 @@ Read({base_path}/prototypes/{target}-style-{style_id}-layout-{layout_id}.html)
 
 ### Step 1: Run Preview Generation Script
 ```bash
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
+bash(ccw tool exec ui_generate_preview '{"prototypesDir":"{base_path}/prototypes"}')
 ```
 
 **Script generates**:
@@ -402,7 +432,7 @@ bash(test -f {base_path}/prototypes/compare.html && echo "exists")
 bash(mkdir -p {base_path}/prototypes)
 
 # Run preview script
-bash(~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh "{base_path}/prototypes")
+bash(ccw tool exec ui_generate_preview '{"prototypesDir":"{base_path}/prototypes"}')
 ```
 
 ## Output Structure
@@ -437,7 +467,7 @@ ERROR: Agent assembly failed
 → Check inputs exist, validate JSON structure
 
 ERROR: Script permission denied
-→ chmod +x ~/.claude/scripts/ui-generate-preview.sh
+→ Verify ccw tool is available: ccw tool list
 ```
 
 ### Recovery Strategies

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/imitate-auto.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 7. Phase 4: Design system integration → **Execute orchestrator task** → Reports completion
 
 **Phase Transition Mechanism**:
-- **Task Attachment**: `SlashCommand` invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow
+- **Task Attachment**: SlashCommand execute **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow
 - **Task Execution**: Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself
 - **Task Collapse**: After tasks complete, collapse them into phase summary
 - **Phase Transition**: Automatically execute next phase after collapsing
@@ -34,7 +34,51 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 
 **Auto-Continue Mechanism**: TodoWrite tracks phase status with dynamic task attachment/collapse. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them, restore phase summary, and execute the next phase. No user intervention required. The workflow is NOT complete until reaching Phase 4.
 
-**Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand invocation is NOT delegation - it's task expansion. The orchestrator executes these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
+**Task Attachment Model**: SlashCommand execute is NOT delegation - it's task expansion. The orchestrator executes these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --input, --session (legacy: --images, --prompt)
+   └─ Decision (input detection):
+      ├─ Contains * or glob matches → images_input (visual)
+      ├─ File/directory exists → code import source
+      └─ Pure text → design prompt
+
+Phase 0: Parameter Parsing & Input Detection
+   ├─ Step 1: Normalize parameters (legacy deprecation warning)
+   ├─ Step 2: Detect design source (hybrid | code_only | visual_only)
+   └─ Step 3: Initialize directories and metadata
+
+Phase 0.5: Code Import (Conditional)
+   └─ Decision (design_source):
+      ├─ hybrid → Execute /workflow:ui-design:import-from-code
+      └─ Other → Skip to Phase 2
+
+Phase 2: Style Extraction
+   └─ Decision (skip_style):
+      ├─ code_only AND style_complete → Use code import
+      └─ Otherwise → Execute /workflow:ui-design:style-extract
+
+Phase 2.3: Animation Extraction
+   └─ Decision (skip_animation):
+      ├─ code_only AND animation_complete → Use code import
+      └─ Otherwise → Execute /workflow:ui-design:animation-extract
+
+Phase 2.5: Layout Extraction
+   └─ Decision (skip_layout):
+      ├─ code_only AND layout_complete → Use code import
+      └─ Otherwise → Execute /workflow:ui-design:layout-extract
+
+Phase 3: UI Assembly
+   └─ Execute /workflow:ui-design:generate
+
+Phase 4: Design System Integration
+   └─ Decision (session_id):
+      ├─ Provided → Execute /workflow:ui-design:update
+      └─ Not provided → Standalone completion
+```
 
 ## Core Rules
 
@@ -42,7 +86,7 @@ allowed-tools: SlashCommand(*), TodoWrite(*), Read(*), Write(*), Bash(*)
 2. **No Preliminary Validation**: Sub-commands handle their own validation
 3. **Parse & Pass**: Extract data from each output for next phase
 4. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
-5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Attachment Model** - SlashCommand invocation **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion. This is NOT delegation - it's task expansion.
+5. **⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Attachment Model** - SlashCommand execute **ATTACHES** tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **EXECUTES** these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion. This is NOT delegation - it's task expansion.
 6. **⚠️ CRITICAL: DO NOT STOP** - This is a continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, you MUST immediately collapse them and execute the next phase. Workflow is NOT complete until Phase 4.
 
 ## Parameter Requirements
@@ -232,7 +276,9 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 
 ### Phase 0.5: Code Import & Completeness Assessment (Conditional)
 
-```bash
+**Step 0.5.1: Execute** - Import design system from code files
+
+```javascript
 # Only execute if code files detected
 IF design_source == "hybrid":
     REPORT: "━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━"
@@ -245,7 +291,7 @@ IF design_source == "hybrid":
               "--source \"{code_base_path}\""
 
     TRY:
-        # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES import-from-code's tasks to current workflow
+        # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES import-from-code's tasks to current workflow
         # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself:
         #   - Phase 0: Discover and categorize code files
         #   - Phase 1.1-1.3: Style/Animation/Layout Agent extraction
@@ -336,7 +382,9 @@ TodoWrite(mark_completed: "Initialize and detect design source",
 
 ### Phase 2: Style Extraction
 
-```bash
+**Step 2.1: Execute** - Extract style design system
+
+```javascript
 # Determine if style extraction needed
 skip_style = (design_source == "code_only" AND style_complete)
 
@@ -361,7 +409,7 @@ ELSE:
 
     extract_command = " ".join(command_parts)
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES style-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES style-extract's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(extract_command)
 
@@ -371,7 +419,9 @@ ELSE:
 
 ### Phase 2.3: Animation Extraction
 
-```bash
+**Step 2.3.1: Execute** - Extract animation patterns
+
+```javascript
 skip_animation = (design_source == "code_only" AND animation_complete)
 
 IF skip_animation:
@@ -392,7 +442,7 @@ ELSE:
 
     animation_extract_command = " ".join(command_parts)
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES animation-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES animation-extract's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(animation_extract_command)
 
@@ -402,7 +452,9 @@ ELSE:
 
 ### Phase 2.5: Layout Extraction
 
-```bash
+**Step 2.5.1: Execute** - Extract layout templates
+
+```javascript
 skip_layout = (design_source == "code_only" AND layout_complete)
 
 IF skip_layout:
@@ -425,7 +477,7 @@ ELSE:
 
     layout_extract_command = " ".join(command_parts)
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES layout-extract's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES layout-extract's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(layout_extract_command)
 
@@ -435,11 +487,13 @@ ELSE:
 
 ### Phase 3: UI Assembly
 
-```bash
+**Step 3.1: Execute** - Assemble UI prototypes from design tokens and layout templates
+
+```javascript
 REPORT: "🚀 Phase 3: UI Assembly"
 generate_command = f"/workflow:ui-design:generate --design-id \"{design_id}\""
 
-# SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES generate's tasks to current workflow
+# SlashCommand execute ATTACHES generate's tasks to current workflow
 # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
 SlashCommand(generate_command)
 
@@ -449,12 +503,14 @@ TodoWrite(mark_completed: "Assemble UI", mark_in_progress: session_id ? "Integra
 
 ### Phase 4: Design System Integration
 
-```bash
+**Step 4.1: Execute** - Integrate design system into workflow session
+
+```javascript
 IF session_id:
     REPORT: "🚀 Phase 4: Design System Integration"
     update_command = f"/workflow:ui-design:update --session {session_id}"
 
-    # SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES update's tasks to current workflow
+    # SlashCommand execute ATTACHES update's tasks to current workflow
     # Orchestrator will EXECUTE these attached tasks itself
     SlashCommand(update_command)
 
@@ -570,32 +626,39 @@ ELSE:
 ```javascript
 // Initialize IMMEDIATELY at start of Phase 0 to track multi-phase execution (6 orchestrator-level tasks)
 TodoWrite({todos: [
-  {content: "Initialize and detect design source", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Initializing"},
-  {content: "Extract style (complete design systems)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting style"},
-  {content: "Extract animation (CSS auto mode)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting animation"},
-  {content: "Extract layout (structure templates)", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting layout"},
-  {content: "Assemble UI prototypes", status: "pending", activeForm: "Assembling UI"},
-  {content: "Integrate design system", status: "pending", activeForm: "Integrating"}
+  {content: "Phase 0: Initialize and Detect Design Source", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Initializing"},
+  {content: "Phase 2: Style Extraction", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting style"},
+  {content: "Phase 2.3: Animation Extraction", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting animation"},
+  {content: "Phase 2.5: Layout Extraction", status: "pending", activeForm: "Extracting layout"},
+  {content: "Phase 3: UI Assembly", status: "pending", activeForm: "Assembling UI"},
+  {content: "Phase 4: Design System Integration", status: "pending", activeForm: "Integrating"}
 ]})
 
 // ⚠️ CRITICAL: Dynamic TodoWrite task attachment strategy:
 //
-// **Key Concept**: SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES tasks to current workflow.
+// **Key Concept**: SlashCommand execute ATTACHES tasks to current workflow.
 // Orchestrator EXECUTES these attached tasks itself, not waiting for external completion.
 //
-// Phase 2-4 SlashCommand Invocation Pattern:
-// 1. SlashCommand invocation ATTACHES sub-command tasks to TodoWrite
-// 2. TodoWrite expands to include attached tasks
-// 3. Orchestrator EXECUTES attached tasks sequentially
-// 4. After all attached tasks complete, COLLAPSE them into phase summary
-// 5. Update next phase to in_progress
-// 6. IMMEDIATELY execute next phase SlashCommand (auto-continue)
+// Phase 2-4 SlashCommand Execute Pattern (when tasks are attached):
+// Example - Phase 2 with sub-tasks:
+// [
+//   {"content": "Phase 0: Initialize and Detect Design Source", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
+//   {"content": "Phase 2: Style Extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Extracting style"},
+//   {"content": "  → Analyze design references", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Analyzing references"},
+//   {"content": "  → Generate design tokens", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating tokens"},
+//   {"content": "  → Create style guide", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating guide"},
+//   {"content": "Phase 2.3: Animation Extraction", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Extracting animation"},
+//   ...
+// ]
+//
+// After sub-tasks complete, COLLAPSE back to:
+// [
+//   {"content": "Phase 0: Initialize and Detect Design Source", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Initializing"},
+//   {"content": "Phase 2: Style Extraction", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Extracting style"},
+//   {"content": "Phase 2.3: Animation Extraction", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Extracting animation"},
+//   ...
+// ]
 //
-// Benefits:
-// ✓ Real-time visibility into sub-command task progress
-// ✓ Clean orchestrator-level summary after each phase
-// ✓ Clear mental model: SlashCommand = attach tasks, not delegate work
-// ✓ Dynamic attachment/collapse maintains clarity
 ```
 
 ## Error Handling
@@ -639,7 +702,7 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
 
 - **Input**: `--images` (glob pattern) and/or `--prompt` (text/file paths) + optional `--session`
 - **Output**: Complete design system in `{base_path}/` (style-extraction, layout-extraction, prototypes)
-- **Sub-commands Called**:
+- **Sub-commands Executeed**:
   1. `/workflow:ui-design:import-from-code` (Phase 0.5, conditional - if code files detected)
   2. `/workflow:ui-design:style-extract` (Phase 2 - complete design systems)
   3. `/workflow:ui-design:animation-extract` (Phase 2.3 - animation tokens)

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/import-from-code.md

@@ -43,6 +43,25 @@ Extract design system tokens from source code files (CSS/SCSS/JS/TS/HTML) using
 
 ## Execution Process
 
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --design-id, --session, --source
+   └─ Decision (base path resolution):
+      ├─ --design-id provided → Exact match by design ID
+      ├─ --session provided → Latest design run in session
+      └─ Neither → ERROR: Must provide --design-id or --session
+
+Phase 0: Setup & File Discovery
+   ├─ Step 1: Resolve base path
+   ├─ Step 2: Initialize directories
+   └─ Step 3: Discover files using script
+
+Phase 1: Parallel Agent Analysis (3 agents)
+   ├─ Style Agent → design-tokens.json + code_snippets
+   ├─ Animation Agent → animation-tokens.json + code_snippets
+   └─ Layout Agent → layout-templates.json + code_snippets
+```
+
 ### Step 1: Setup & File Discovery
 
 **Purpose**: Initialize session, discover and categorize code files
@@ -87,7 +106,7 @@ echo "  Output: $base_path"
 
 # 3. Discover files using script
 discovery_file="${intermediates_dir}/discovered-files.json"
-~/.claude/scripts/discover-design-files.sh "$source" "$discovery_file"
+ccw tool exec discover_design_files '{"sourceDir":"'"$source"'","outputPath":"'"$discovery_file"'"}'
 
 echo "  Output: $discovery_file"
 ```
@@ -142,6 +161,7 @@ echo "[Phase 1] Starting parallel agent analysis (3 agents)"
 
 ```javascript
 Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
      prompt="[STYLE_TOKENS_EXTRACTION]
   Extract visual design tokens from code files using code import extraction pattern.
 
@@ -161,14 +181,14 @@ Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
   - Pattern: rg → Extract values → Compare → If different → Read full context with comments → Record conflict
   - Alternative (if many files): Execute CLI analysis for comprehensive report:
     \`\`\`bash
-    cd ${source} && gemini -p \"
+    ccw cli -p \"
     PURPOSE: Detect color token conflicts across all CSS/SCSS/JS files
     TASK: • Scan all files for color definitions • Identify conflicting values • Extract semantic comments
     MODE: analysis
     CONTEXT: @**/*.css @**/*.scss @**/*.js @**/*.ts
     EXPECTED: JSON report listing conflicts with file:line, values, semantic context
     RULES: Focus on core tokens | Report ALL variants | analysis=READ-ONLY
-    \"
+    \" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd ${source}
     \`\`\`
 
   **Step 1: Load file list**
@@ -257,6 +277,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
 
 ```javascript
 Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
      prompt="[ANIMATION_TOKEN_GENERATION_TASK]
   Extract animation tokens from code files using code import extraction pattern.
 
@@ -276,14 +297,14 @@ Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
   - Pattern: rg → Identify animation types → Map framework usage → Prioritize extraction targets
   - Alternative (if complex framework mix): Execute CLI analysis for comprehensive report:
     \`\`\`bash
-    cd ${source} && gemini -p \"
+    ccw cli -p \"
     PURPOSE: Detect animation frameworks and patterns
     TASK: • Identify frameworks • Map animation patterns • Categorize by complexity
     MODE: analysis
     CONTEXT: @**/*.css @**/*.scss @**/*.js @**/*.ts
     EXPECTED: JSON report listing frameworks, animation types, file locations
     RULES: Focus on framework consistency | Map all animations | analysis=READ-ONLY
-    \"
+    \" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd ${source}
     \`\`\`
 
   **Step 1: Load file list**
@@ -336,6 +357,7 @@ Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
 
 ```javascript
 Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
+     run_in_background=false,
      prompt="[LAYOUT_TEMPLATE_GENERATION_TASK]
   Extract layout patterns from code files using code import extraction pattern.
 
@@ -355,14 +377,14 @@ Task(subagent_type="ui-design-agent",
   - Pattern: rg → Count occurrences → Classify by frequency → Prioritize universal components
   - Alternative (if large codebase): Execute CLI analysis for comprehensive categorization:
     \`\`\`bash
-    cd ${source} && gemini -p \"
+    ccw cli -p \"
     PURPOSE: Classify components as universal vs specialized
     TASK: • Identify UI components • Classify reusability • Map layout systems
     MODE: analysis
     CONTEXT: @**/*.css @**/*.scss @**/*.js @**/*.ts @**/*.html
     EXPECTED: JSON report categorizing components, layout patterns, naming conventions
     RULES: Focus on component reusability | Identify layout systems | analysis=READ-ONLY
-    \"
+    \" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd ${source}
     \`\`\`
 
   **Step 1: Load file list**

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/layout-extract.md

@@ -23,6 +23,39 @@ This command separates the "scaffolding" (HTML structure and CSS layout) from th
 - **Device-Aware**: Optimized for specific device types (desktop, mobile, tablet, responsive)
 - **Token-Based**: CSS uses `var()` placeholders for spacing and breakpoints
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --design-id, --session, --images, --prompt, --targets, --variants, --device-type, --interactive, --refine
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --refine flag → Refinement Mode (variants_count = 1)
+      └─ No --refine → Exploration Mode (variants_count = --variants OR 3)
+
+Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Detect input, mode & targets
+   ├─ Step 2: Load inputs & create directories
+   └─ Step 3: Memory check (skip if cached)
+
+Phase 1: Layout Concept/Refinement Options Generation
+   ├─ Step 0.5: Load existing layout (Refinement Mode only)
+   ├─ Step 1: Generate options (Agent Task 1)
+   │  └─ Decision:
+   │     ├─ Exploration Mode → Generate contrasting layout concepts
+   │     └─ Refinement Mode → Generate refinement options
+   └─ Step 2: Verify options file created
+
+Phase 1.5: User Confirmation (Optional)
+   └─ Decision (--interactive flag):
+      ├─ --interactive present → Present options, capture selection
+      └─ No --interactive → Skip to Phase 2
+
+Phase 2: Layout Template Generation
+   ├─ Step 1: Load user selections or default to all
+   ├─ Step 2: Launch parallel agent tasks
+   └─ Step 3: Verify output files
+```
+
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Detect Input, Mode & Targets

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/reference-page-generator.md

@@ -33,6 +33,29 @@ Converts design run extraction results into shareable reference package with:
 
 ## Execution Process
 
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --design-run, --package-name, --output-dir
+   └─ Validation:
+      ├─ --design-run and --package-name REQUIRED
+      └─ Package name format: lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only
+
+Phase 0: Setup & Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Validate required parameters
+   ├─ Step 2: Validate package name format
+   ├─ Step 3: Validate design run exists
+   ├─ Step 4: Check required extraction files (design-tokens.json, layout-templates.json)
+   └─ Step 5: Setup output directory
+
+Phase 1: Prepare Component Data
+   ├─ Step 1: Copy layout templates
+   ├─ Step 2: Copy design tokens
+   └─ Step 3: Copy animation tokens (optional)
+
+Phase 2: Preview Generation (Agent)
+   └─ Generate preview.html + preview.css via ui-design-agent
+```
+
 ### Phase 0: Setup & Validation
 
 **Purpose**: Validate inputs, prepare output directory

.claude/commands/workflow/ui-design/style-extract.md

@@ -19,6 +19,43 @@ Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Claude's built-
 - **Dual Mode**: Exploration (multiple contrasting variants) or Refinement (single design fine-tuning)
 - **Production-Ready**: WCAG AA compliant, OKLCH colors, semantic naming
 
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   ├─ Parse flags: --design-id, --session, --images, --prompt, --variants, --interactive, --refine
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --refine flag → Refinement Mode (variants_count = 1)
+      └─ No --refine → Exploration Mode (variants_count = --variants OR 3)
+
+Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
+   ├─ Step 1: Detect input mode, extraction mode & base path
+   ├─ Step 2: Load inputs
+   └─ Step 3: Memory check (skip if exists)
+
+Phase 1: Design Direction/Refinement Options Generation
+   ├─ Step 1: Load project context
+   ├─ Step 2: Generate options (Agent Task 1)
+   │  └─ Decision:
+   │     ├─ Exploration Mode → Generate contrasting design directions
+   │     └─ Refinement Mode → Generate refinement options
+   └─ Step 3: Verify options file created
+
+Phase 1.5: User Confirmation (Optional)
+   └─ Decision (--interactive flag):
+      ├─ --interactive present → Present options, capture selection
+      └─ No --interactive → Skip to Phase 2
+
+Phase 2: Design System Generation
+   ├─ Step 1: Load user selection or default to all
+   ├─ Step 2: Create output directories
+   └─ Step 3: Launch agent tasks (parallel)
+
+Phase 3: Verify Output
+   ├─ Step 1: Check files created
+   └─ Step 2: Verify file sizes
+```
+
 ## Phase 0: Setup & Input Validation
 
 ### Step 1: Detect Input Mode, Extraction Mode & Base Path

.claude/scripts/classify-folders.sh

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/bash
-# Classify folders by type for documentation generation
-# Usage: get_modules_by_depth.sh | classify-folders.sh
-# Output: folder_path|folder_type|code:N|dirs:N
-
-while IFS='|' read -r depth_info path_info files_info types_info claude_info; do
-  # Extract folder path from format "path:./src/modules"
-  folder_path=$(echo "$path_info" | cut -d':' -f2-)
-
-  # Skip if path extraction failed
-  [[ -z "$folder_path" || ! -d "$folder_path" ]] && continue
-
-  # Count code files (maxdepth 1)
-  code_files=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type f \
-    \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" \
-       -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.rs" \
-       -o -name "*.c" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.cs" \) \
-    2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-
-  # Count subdirectories
-  subfolders=$(find "$folder_path" -maxdepth 1 -type d \
-    -not -path "$folder_path" 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
-
-  # Determine folder type
-  if [[ $code_files -gt 0 ]]; then
-    folder_type="code"  # API.md + README.md
-  elif [[ $subfolders -gt 0 ]]; then
-    folder_type="navigation"  # README.md only
-  else
-    folder_type="skip"  # Empty or no relevant content
-  fi
-
-  # Output classification result
-  echo "${folder_path}|${folder_type}|code:${code_files}|dirs:${subfolders}"
-done